The Highwire with Del Bigtree - THE RISE OF VACCINE HESITANCY

Episode Date: May 7, 2022

After a multi-billion dollar global campaign to eradicate vaccine hesitancy and inoculate the world against Covid, data is showing those receiving boosters is rapidly declining, along with routine childhood vaccinations.#VaccineHesitancy #CDC #NotMisinformationBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-highwire-with-del-bigtree--3620606/support.

Things are really getting crazy in the news. The whole world in some ways seems like it's on fire. And we're not even talking about COVID very much anymore. But I want to really talk about, you know, how we got here, where we're at, and discuss sort of the potential of the power that we have, what we're recognizing we can do as people. And by doing that, the biggest focus here on the high wire, for those of you that are new,

has obviously been looking at the vaccine program in general before there was the COVID pandemic. We had been discussing all the issues with the childhood vaccine program, the lack of safety testing that was going on, the fact that there was this one-size-fits-all approach to all of our children. No one wanted to recognize the amount of injuries that were taking place. And doctors that we would ask questions had no ability to answer those questions. It seemed as though vaccination was more of a religious sacrament than it was some sort of scientific process, especially when it came to asking those that knew or were supposed to know what they were talking about. Well, because of all that, if you think about before COVID, before the pandemic, where were we at, the work that we

were doing on the high wire, and we were warning people. I was saying across this country and even around the world in places I was speaking, I think there's going to be a pandemic coming. There was much writing on the wall for all of that. Well, all of those talking points started being shared across this country. We put out what we called the vaccine safety project. We listed all of the problems we saw in the vaccine program. Most importantly, the fact that it appeared and we proved ultimately through legal cases in our legal team that not a single childhood vaccine on the CDC schedule had ever been through a proper randomized control placebo study before licensing. Here it was. We laid this out to you. Not one of those ever sat in a placebo group study where one group got the vaccine and the other group got the placebo when we followed them for maybe a couple of years to see what their ultimate health outcomes were. Well, because of that, there started being this shift in the conversation across this country and around the world as these ideas were being shared, which then ultimately landed us and all of us in the movement of vaccine risk.

awareness on the WHO's top 10 list of the most harmful here it is. WHO says antifaxins are the global health threat. Anti-vaccin, if you read up, top sentences are among the top 10 greatest health threats in the world today. For many, there would not be something you'd want to celebrate, but to us that showed that we were making headway, that this conversation was starting to truly move the needle. Well, then, just before the COVID pandemic, in December of 2000, 2019, the World Health Organization held a meeting to try and stop this top 10 global health problem.

Of course, I'm talking about the Global Health Summit that took place in Geneva, Switzerland, and brought in all the top scientists from around the world to focus on one issue. How do we stop vaccine hesitancy? That was it. Vaccine hesitancy is a global problem. We've got to get people to start believing in vaccines again. Well, we have done a whole show on this. You should go back and watch the WHO show,

but I just want to lay out one of the major points that was put forward, and the sort of crisis the WHO found itself in when it came to the World Vaccination Program. It was really explained very well by Heidi Larson. We've shown this video many times before. I'm going to do it again, but to give you context of where we're actually at now, this is Dr. Heidi Larson talking about this vaccine risk or anti-vaccin, movement and the growth that we were seeing in 2019. Take a look at this. This is a physicist I'm working with it at GW in George Washington University is actually an

Oxford physicist. These are, he has had worked primarily on different kinds of social networks but I was fascinated by his methods and I said listen you should look at the vaccine space. So each of these blobs, as he calls them, are communities like a Facebook page, which is, or Arnica, this group of mothers. So the green dots are undecided, neutral communities, people interested in vaccines but asking questions. The red are the clearly questioning anti-communities, and the blue are the positive. Already you can see the blue is a tighter group and the red more out there.

Now, if you look at the numbers, what he was looking at was over a period of time, literally a couple months, what is the recruiting pace of the blue positive versus the red in them converting the undecided to their camp? or the other. The it was a 500% faster recruitment by the negative than the positive vaccine community. That's that's fast. So there you have it we were recruiting people at a 500% faster recruitment rate for those of us questioning vaccines compared to those that were just religiously believing in them

and trying pushing that they're all perfectly safe, all perfectly effective, which we know is not the truth. Well, that was the issue. And so from this meeting, amazingly, when you think about they all came together. World renounced scientists from every direction came together. How do we stop vaccine hesitancy? This is them all standing together. We're going to think tank this and figure out a way. Well, then just within literally two months, we found ourselves in the middle of this.

COVID pandemic. Now, I'm not saying they caused it or manufactured it. Maybe it was just, you know, opportunistic that it happened right at that time. That doesn't really matter. What we do know is suddenly we had a pandemic where the conversation across the world, every one of these scientists went to their health departments in every nation in the world and got the nations to believe that there was going to be only one way out of this pandemic. What? Vaccination. That everyone would have to be part of the vaccine program. Now, it seems to me that that was the push. Here we go. We are going to get back on track and make people confident in vaccines again. We're going to use this pandemic to do it and this brand new COVID vaccine. Well, I just want to talk a little bit about the success that

we're now seeing from that approach, this worldwide global push, the most organized propaganda campaign that has ever happened in every nation in the world. I can't think of a single other time where we were all so, you know, consolidated into one idea, one way future, holding arms together, we're going to just save ourselves with the vaccine. Well, here's where we're at now. Look at these headlines. Millions of COVID-19 shots set to go to waste as vaccine rollout slows. That's ABC News. Attendance plummets at L.A. COVID vaccination event. This isn't just a couple days ago. At a recent vaccination drive coordinated by an immigrant advocacy group in Palmdale near Lancaster in northern L.A. County, only two people showed up over four hours, both for their

second doses. Corhey Perez, Salva Organization's vaccine coordinator, spent a week promoting the event with his team, going door to door, visiting local businesses and publicizing it on social media. At previous vaccine drives, we got 42 people, then 20. Then four, said a disappointed Perez. Now, two. COVID-19 serum Institute of India halts vaccine production over millions of unused doses. That's the times of India. Financial times. We are drowning in vaccine.

What will revive the market for COVID jabs? Modernist chief says there is massive oversupply. Poland declines to take or pay for more COVID-19 vaccines for now. Denmark's suspends. National COVID-19 vaccination program. And so when you think about all of those things, we can tell, I could go on and on. We're seeing it all across the world. We have just oceans of COVID vaccines that nobody seems to want.

We're being told that the uptake here in America was somewhere between 60%. I've heard as high as 75% got at least one dose, which remember the CDC does not consider vaccinated at all. So when you look at what happened here, this COVID-190. vaccine was supposed to be the savior to revive the confidence of vaccination for everyone in the world, yet the opposite seems to be the case. But the biggest concern would be if it ended up hurting the entire vaccine program. Now, I want to also point out that it wasn't just the WHO that was involved in, you know, sort of pushing a pandemic. There was planning for this pandemic

or any future pandemic. Let's not make it a conspiracy theory. Any probable By who? Bill Gates. Of course, I'm talking about Event 201. To really get an idea of what Event 201 was, which was this sort of Dungeons Dragons version of a future pandemic, if you will, with a bunch of geeks sitting in a room with fake news and trying to act like the real pandemic was happening, role playing it out, if you will. It was covered very well in Pandemic 2. This is the section from that brilliant movie on Event 201. Just watch. This is all what they had pre-recorded as what it would be like if we had a pandemic. On behalf of our center and our partners, the World Economic Forum and the Bill of

Melinda Gates Foundation, I'd like to extend a very warm welcome to our audience here in New York, as well as our larger virtual audience participating online today. The event 201 scenario is fictional. Today's scenario is going to simulate meetings of a multi-stakeholder group called the Pandemic emergency board. We're at the start of what's looking like it will be a severe pandemic. And there are problems emerging that can only be solved by global business and governments working together.

There's been some conspiracy theories that are around about the potential that the pharmaceutical companies or the UN have released this for their own benefit. And maybe this is a time for us to showcase some cases where we are able to bring forward some bad actors and leave it before the courts to decide whether they have actually spread some fake news. A new coronavirus. Infected people got a respiratory illness with symptoms ranging from mild flu-like signs

to severe pneumonia. In related news, a significant demand for personal protective equipment, like N95 masks and gloves, are on the rise. Patients are overwhelming healthcare facilities. People are avoiding public spaces out of fear of infection and in compliance with public health recommendations. Our US affiliate has just released polling results

on public expectations for a vaccine, and 65% of those polled are eager to take the vaccine, even if it's experimental. I'm not optimistic about having a vaccine in time to be relevant during this pandemic. With enough money and political will, anything is possible. Penalties have been put in place

for spreading harmful falsehoods, including arrests. If the solution means controlling and reducing access to information, I think it's the right choice. There is no question that there will be a surprise outbreak. If we start now, we can be ready for the next epidemic. Of course, if you haven't seen Plannedemic indoctrinated, definitely do that right away. A brilliant film, my great friend Mickey Willis, that director didn't put that together.

But is it not shocking to see how surprisingly accurate they were, even to the point where there would be some people claiming that this virus was released on purpose to achieve a goal? Really weird that they would project that that would be the case. or the fact that only 65% would want the vaccine or that there would be pushback. All of these things predicted or were sort of set up to be how this entire thing came together.

But the question I ask you now is with all of that planning, and remember, we've looked into this, but the funding of Event 201 came from really just three major organizations that is the World Economic Forum, John Hopkins and Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, of course, Bill Gates, really this brain-trane,

trust who was already invested in technologies to track us, like vaccine passport technologies. He had his money in vaccines themselves, the COVID vaccine, and of course the testing kits. So it sure seemed like he was prepared to make a lot of money, at least for his NGOs that are supposed nonprofits that are ambivalent, of course, and trying to just make the world a better place. But when you think about how, what a failure, you know, the COVID vaccine program was, You know, the question then you have to ask Bill Gates is, well, how did it go? After all of your planning and all that funding and you seem to be so accurate, did it go how you had thought?

This is what he said recently. The politicization of, you know, taking vaccines and helping protect other people, you can almost say that's a step backwards. You know, I hope vaccine acceptance for other diseases like measles is not reduced by this. but a lot of people jumped in and took the vaccines, but a meaningful minority in most countries were led down a path

of believing that not only were there rare side effects, but the vaccine wasn't properly tested or was part of some evil conspiracy. Well, unfortunately, it looks like for Bill Gates,

the Dungeons and Dragons version of a pandemic did not role play out in reality the way it had in his mind and the minds of all of his friends that were playing the game. In fact, exactly his greatest fear is upon him. Remember, we had roughly a 90% or 95% vaccine confidence in America. They were just trying to really squeeze out that 5% of critical thinkers that just said, I don't think so. Or maybe I'm at least questioning it. So where are we at now? Check out the headlines. His fear is upon him. Politico. COVID vaccine concerns are starting to spill over into routine immunizations. This is MedPage today. CDC finds concerning dip

in kindergarten vaccination coverage. Nation rate dropped below public health target of 95%. And this is New Hampshire Bulletin. Antivaccent legislation puts health care organizations in an impossible situation. This is a commentary. And this is brilliant because if you think about defeat the mandates, of course, we're not stopping at just the COVID vaccine. And for those of you've been watching this. A lot of people say, Del, why don't you compare the COVID vaccine? This is early on, like over a year ago, to how bad the childhood vaccines are because all these doctors say, well, the COVID vaccine is bad, but they're just not as good as the old childhood vaccines. You got to correct that. I said, wait for it. Wait for it. Because it's sort of like that old statement,

don't fire until you see the whites of their eyes. Wait till they, or my father used to always say about running a company. If someone's really making a mistake, make sure you're giving them enough rope to hang themselves with. Well, that's where we're at. I said, Just go ahead and give them as much line as they want with COVID. Let them make all the statements they want about how bad COVID vaccine is compared to the childhood schedule. And then we'll get back to the point, which is what we're starting to do now. But it's happening naturally. Not only are we fighting the COVID vaccine mandates, we're fighting the childhood mandates, which make no sense in a modern free world.

This is what that article went on to say. What began as an effort to eliminate COVID-19 vaccine requirements has transformed into a movement. at the state legislature to kick the legs out from under New Hampshire's longstanding childhood and adult vaccine program. Many of you are like adult program. That's right, folks. They had one for you too. The state legislature, as we speak, is considering dozens of bills that, if they became

law, would take away the ability of our schools, colleges, universities, private businesses, daycare centers, and health care organizations to require vaccines. We want to be able to force them on you and you're trying to take that away from us. Well, I think all of this is proving to be having had a huge effect when we look at the Iowa poll. This was recently, I've showed this to you before, but this was just back in March of the 13th. Iowa's support for non-COVID vaccine requirements in schools erodes Iowa poll finds, folks, this is amazing. Just 34% of Iowa adults. Remember, how often do we look to Iowa to show the pulse of the nation when voting for things?

Just 34% of Iowa adults now say all children should be required to receive standard shots unless they have a doctor-signed statement showing they have a medical reason not to be vaccinated. The poll shows that's down from 59% who supported such a requirement in 2015 when the Iowa poll asked a similar question about childhood vaccinations. That is a 25% drop, very interesting chart here that shows how it all lays out. Of course, you want to look at these charts or anything else. You just have to go to be a part of our newsletter, the highwire.com. Sign up to our newsletter for all of the information we provide here.

We are a completely transparent news organization. You receive links to everything we're talking about. All you have to do is sign up to our newsletter. And then you have this information in your hand. We call it the High Wire Protocol. Because unlike all of those competitors that try to say we're spreading misinformation, we hand our information directly to you so that you can challenge us. If you want to, that's real transparency.

You should try spreading misinformation when you're handing all of your evidence to the people, including those on the other side. So here we are. Now we have the Iowa poll saying we are below 50% of Americans now believe that a requirement for vaccination to go to school should even exist. If there's any question inside of you, whether we are winning or where we're at, remember, We had a, what, they said 95% vaccine uptake, and now that it's falling apart, and only 34% of those think we should even have a mandated vaccine. And the point I want to make about this, which is so fascinating, when you look at that New Hampshire article, as though somehow giving people free will and free choice will eradicate your ability to get anyone vaccinated.

Do you see what they're admitting here? What they're saying is they don't trust the people anymore. And they don't trust their own ability to develop a product, to take the billions of dollars they make from those products, to advertise it in a way to you that you will believe that your children need this. They are totally admitting that this product is so unfavorable now that they don't think they can get it into you in any other way than using some sort of authoritarian tool that forces it into your body. That's what they're reduced to. and now they're complaining that the legislatures and laws are starting to move against them. Folks, I assure you that whoever put together event 201 is going back to the drawing boards. And we know who they are.

And the WHO and their giant event on how to stop vaccine hesitancy has backfired. Why did it backfire? Perhaps because they didn't listen to Heidi Larson to begin with. Because they decided, let's just censor anybody that goes against. us. Let's just shut down the internet, shut down media, not interview anyone questioning the vaccines. She said that might be a problem before they even started this thing. Listen to this. I spent a lot of time talking particularly in the last six months with tech companies, Facebook, WhatsApp, Pulsar, Twitter, Instagram, WeChat, Weibo. They have a lot of fingers pointing at them.

to fix the misinformation problem. But it's not so simple. One, the biggest problem is a lot of it's not misinformation. Our problem is, as we've heard in the last 48 hours, that there's not anything 100%. And what actually can legally, without creating a censorship thing, can we absolutely say this is misinformation? because we have a lot of ambiguity in the safety field,

and we have to come to terms with that. So we have to think about it differently than deleting misinformation, but building trust, so people are willing to put up with a certain amount of risk because they believe in it enough. They believe in our work, what we're doing, and that it's in their interest.

I kind of agree with Heidi there. You know what it's better to be honest with the people than to lie to them and call it misinformation and lie about it because the truth is it's not misinformation. You should be admitting that the COVID vaccine was never properly safety tested, that everyone taking it was taking on an unknown risk. At least then we would have known you tell us the truth instead of lying to us that in this case maybe it wasn't 100% effective but it's 95% effective. Wait a minute, more like 80% effective. Well, maybe 75% effective. Well, it's 50% effective after the second booster. Well, a month, we better be getting a third booster because it looks like Amacron is getting through, oh, well, you know, we're going to have to learn to live with it.

You want to know why they don't trust you? Because your plan stinks. It's called lying to the people. And while they go back to the drawing boards to figure out how they're going to do this all over again, I want to let you know something. We had plans too. We saw them coming here at the people. the high wire end, the informed consent action network.

I wasn't just telling you, I believe there was going to be a pandemic somewhere in the future. We were planning for it, and we have won.