The Highwire with Del Bigtree - THE SPEED OF SCIENCE

Episode Date: October 22, 2022

CDC’s ACIP Vote on Covid Vaccine for Children; Biden Extends Health Emergency; More Gain of Function?!; FL DOH Recommends Against Covid Shot; The Biggest ‘I Told You So’ EverGuest: Joseph Ladapo, M.D. PhD#TheSpeedofScience #TheCDCBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-highwire-with-del-bigtree--3620606/support.

Good morning, good afternoon, good evening. Wherever you are out there in the world, it's time to step out onto the high wire. Welcome, ladies and gentlemen, mothers, fathers, grandparents, children, all of those that are watching. I'm going to announce that today, October 20, 2022, is a day that will live in infamy. Just moments ago, before this broadcast, our own CDC and the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices representing the United States, States of America and our health departments voted unanimously 15 to zero to approve the COVID-19 vaccine to be added to the childhood schedule. This means that a product that was never properly approved for safety, never went through a long-term safety trial is still only under an emergency use authorization,

meaning they rushed it out because they didn't have time to do the science. Now, without official approval, has been put under the childhood schedule. This will lead to mandates across the United States of America for children to be able to enter school and preschools, high schools, and colleges. They will follow suit. And so now, an untested vaccine that has shown to cause harm all around the world, especially to children, for a virus that does not affect children, has been forced upon our population by a regulatory agency that is supposed to be working for us.

I believe this day will mark the moment in which the United States of America, at least the majority, is going to turn against the CDC and recommendations that come from it and any belief in the science that they have stood for for all of these years. This is an unfortunate development and today we are going to do a very special show. We're going to discuss all that is happening in the world today, a time capsule, if you will, to talk about exactly what we knew and what we did not know at the moment that the CDC made this historic decision. To get to that point, I think it's time to bring in my partner, Jeffrey Jackson,

and the Jackson Report. All right, Jeffrey, thank you for joining me. You're in studio. we had a sense that this was going to be the outcome at ASIP. Unfortunately, just as the things were lining up, and we put out calls to people to write into the CDC. We all took part in that opportunity to try and get them to stop making this, I think, grave error. I think this will go down as one of the biggest catastrophic errors in science.

So, you know, this really, you know, in many ways, I think we saw this start. to, you know, ramp up really with an announcement that Biden made. I think what makes the context of this so important is looking at what President Biden said just a few weeks ago about the state of this pandemic. So let's take a look at that first. Is the pandemic over? The pandemic is over. We still have a problem with COVID.

We're still doing a lot of work on it. It's, but the pandemic is over. If you notice, no one's wearing masks. Everybody seems to be in pretty good shape. So it's amazing, right? We had just a few weeks ago, the President of the United States saying the pandemic is over, right? Which I think for most people means great. We can let down our shoulders. This entire ridiculous charade we've been a part of has ended and we can all move on with the rest of our lives. But there was a shift recently. Yeah, just weeks after that comment by the president, we have Javier Becerra from HHS. He's the secretary of the head there. He came out and renewed the public health emergency that. is the COVID-19 public health emergency. So kind of going against what Biden was saying.

So now we're still in a public health emergency. And of course, one of the reasons for that public health emergency here... We have that right here. Let me go ahead and read that. Renewal of determination that a public health emergency exists. Remember, this is coming from the Biden administration. So he's not going against it. Biden must be going along with it.

As a result of the continued consequences, the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic on this date and after consultation with public health officials is necessary, I Javier Bacera, Secretary of Health and Human Services, pursuant to the authority vested in me under Section 319, the Public Health Service Act, do hereby renew effective October 13th, 2022. It was a few days ago, the January 31st, 2020 determination by former Secretary Alex Azar, that he previously renewed on April 21st, 2020, July 23, 2020, October 2nd, 2020, January 7th, 2021, and that I renewed on April 15th, 2021, July 19th, 2021, October 15th, 2021. You get it, all of those dates that a public health emergency exists and has existed since January of 2020. So it's a far cry.

I mean, I don't understand how you can say a pandemic is over, but we're still in an emergency. It's like, you know, it doesn't make any sense. But the writing was on the wall there, right? Because we're talking about what happened, what would have happened had they not renewed this emergency use authorization? Well, the biggest thing, especially in the context of what we're talking about right now, The emergency use goes away. They don't renew that. All vaccinations under emergency use authorization

and on the day that vaccination or that renewal does not happen. So we're talking about no more EUA vaccinations. So everything that ASIP just voted for for the kids, all the kids vaccines are still under EUA. So like you said, for the first time, we have an EUA vaccine that's put on a recommended schedule for the child routine childhood schedule for the CDC. So those would be gone.

There would be no chance for those to be put on there. So this. Well, I mean, essentially would have had to take then an unapproved, unrecommended, I mean, and then put it on the schedule. Essentially, all those childhood vaccines would have disappeared the moment that we removed the emergency and thus the emergency use authorization. So it was clear they were bridging a gap because it made no sense. We don't have children in hospitals. Everyone knows Omicron is a nothing burger now, which is great, that they said everyone around the world is going to have to learn to live with it. This is a good

form variant to be catching to achieve herd of beauty. they're starting to admit a little bit more and more is quite robust, even though we've pointed out that the science is there. But it would have been very hard to have a product that has no approval whatsoever, lost its emergency use, and then say we're going to take this completely unapproved product and put it on the schedule. So it seemed to us they were preparing for what just took place today. Right. And as you mentioned, what just took place today, we have a 15 to zero vote from the ASIP members, the committee, and Reuters headline just came out here.

The headline states, U.S. CDC advisors approve adding COVID shots to vaccine schedules. Now, this is for children and for adults, too. That's slipped in there as well. Really? But the children are the ones under the EUA. So that's why this is such a big deal. So just yesterday, a lot of the headlines were saying this already happened because this is misinformation because people are saying this already happened. Yesterday, that same committee, the same members, 15 to 0, voted for something called vaccination for kids. And I'm going to put that in a quotation marks because that's a problem.

program for kind of underserved communities. So the uninsured, the underinsured, people like that. So that's a, that's a kind of a subset. I saw a post saying, oh, it's been approved. We're not going to be able to go into schools. And I was like, wait a minute, we're still waiting for that vote to happen today. Right. The misunderstanding was this was for the underserved community, which is still a large, you know, a portion of children that deserve the same rights as everyone else. And there was some corrections of that, but it was only a correction that would have to last for 24 hours because 24 hours later they actually did have the vote that everyone thought yesterday's vote was all about. Yeah, and that distinction is right on the CDC's website. They have a chart here

which tells the distinctions between the two. And if you want to look at that, you can go right to the CDC. But, you know, what we're talking about here is, is we're talking about still, the conversation is the COVID threat to children has never really been a major threat. Right. I mean, we have even Johnny I needy, he's talking about in his study, it's well, 1%. And we're looking at that here. Right. So Johnny Uniti's literally described as the world's leading epidemiologists in the world. This was from his study back in 2021. Look at the death rate for 0 to 19, the group that just had this vaccine mandated. They won't be able to go to school. The death rate was 0.027%. You don't have to be good in math to know that that rounds to zero. Right. And you know,

What's interesting about that is that study was taken during what we're told was a more virulent ancestral Wuhan strain. We're told the Omicron strain is much more mild. So, you know, it's not even that high. I mean, we're, you know, we're probably adding a few more zeros behind the decimal point. Exactly, exactly. And so let's look at another angle of this. You know, we were talking about VERS and all the underreporting on that.

Let's look at open VERS. So we have this is the reporting in the backdrop of this. This is what they're voting, and this is how many people have reported to VERS. And of interest of this is the myocarditis cases. We've shown this before. In 2021 and 2022, when the vaccine rollout came, the myocarditis cases jumped up greatly. The 53,000 right there, 53,11414 at the bottom of your screen. I'll also point out 31,470 reported deaths, the highest reports of deaths for any vaccine in history.

In fact, if you took all the vaccines, combined them together, and all, all of the over 20 years of VERS reporting, we do not have 31,000 deaths is now being reported just for this one singular vaccine. So the idea that there's no alarm here, there's no red flag, we should just go guns blazing forward with this untested product and mandate on children is outrageous. But let's get into that myocardis,

because bears, I know that just came up, point out what we were just showing in the VERS report there. Yeah, so we have that myocarditis on that chart. We see in 2021, 2022, when the vaccine rollout happened, you see a gigantic sput. Now notice before that, those are all the other vaccinations that are really on the childhood schedule. Not much going on from 2010 to 2020, but as soon as they rolled out that vaccine, especially in younger kids, younger boys, the MRI shots, the myocarditis is a problem.

While we're looking at this everyone, I just want you to, and some of you may be brand new because I know that this issue today is going to drive you to watching the high wire for the first time. Myocarditis, swelling of the hearts and children, all the vaccines put together from 2010 to 2020, Those were the reports that came into this VAIRS, vaccine adverse events reporting system, where we report vaccine injury if we're injured by them. Look what happens in 2021 and 2022 upon this brand new vaccine entering the market. It skyrockets through the roof thousands of reports for myocarditis. And yet the CDC says nothing to see here. I mean, it defies all reasons.

Right. And when you read some of the scientific literature, the researchers that are doing the studies, there's almost a scientific consensus, if you will, that VERS is an underreported system. They say that in the scientific research that we've looked at here on this show. But now let's look at the ASEP's own committee slides from last year in the summer.

They were voting on the EUA for the kids for the vaccination, and they were looking at myocredit. This is an actual slide. This was only a seven-day risk window. So imagine you're only going to say seven days. After seven days, we're not going to look anymore. So in those seven days, you see here in red, let's look at the males on the right side.

12 to 17 years old, that top line, we expected zero to four myocarditis or pericarditis cases. They found observed 128. The next thing. After vaccination. After vaccination. The vaccination clearly raised your risk of myocarditis. Expected 428, you know, incredible jump.

Yeah. And then so 18 to 24 years old, expected 1 to 8. They found, they observed 219. This is following the two dose. That's a 200% increase. It's incredible. Yes, yes. And so we're continuing on this.

We're seeing it in the studies as well. There's a study out of Thailand that we just reported on. This received a lot of attention from the media, and I think it's important to wrap it back around here. They randomly took 314 kids in Thailand, just randomly picked them out, and they looked at what happened to these kids after the Pfizer vaccination as far as their cardiovascular events.

And it says here, in the study, this prospective cohort study enrolled students from two schools aged 13 to 18 years who received the second dose of the BNT-16-2B. That's Pfizer's MRNA COVID-19 vaccine. Data including, now, this was a robust reporting here. Data including demographics, symptoms, vital signs, ECG, echocardiograms, and cardiac enzymes were collected at baseline.

That's basically day zero, day three, day seven, and day 14, which is optional using case record forms. What did they find? This is directly from the study. They said the most common cardiovascular effects were tachycardia, 7.64 percent, shortness of breath, 6.64 percent, palpitition, 4.32 percent. pain, 4.32%, and hypertension, 3.99%. Seven participants, 2.33%, exhibited at least one elevated cardiac biomarker of positive lab assessments.

Cardiovascular effects, here we go. We're found in 29.24% of patients, ranging from tachycardia, palpitation, and myoparricarditis. Miopericarditis was confirmed in one patient after vaccination. So you're telling me, a therapeutic for a child is going to cause nearly 30% of them to have cardiovascular effects. cardiologists or doctor out there would never do this under other circumstances. Of course, we've had Dr. Peter McCullough, the world-renowned, leading heart doctor in the world, published more than any other heart doctor in the world, has come out against this vaccine for exactly this issues. And remember, we're talking about a study of 300 children. When we hear about vaccines,

we've been always told vaccine injuries, one in a million. Maybe if they're really being honest, they'll say one in 100,000, you never really hear one in 10,000. We're talking out of 300 kids, 9.4% of them, you know, nearly 30% of them had some form, one form of another of a heart issue after vaccination. That is, why would you do this to your children for, as we pointed out, a 0% risk of death from the virus itself. Yeah. And there's a couple stories competing here to maybe why this was happening, why ASIP did this. So understand, there's a headline that just happened about a month ago and it's talking about casting these vaccines, more than and Pfizer's vaccines into the free market.

Up until now, these have been subsidized by the U.S. government with our taxpayer money funded these vaccine rollouts. So this is the headline out of Fierce Pharma talking about that. It says no more free vaccines. US plots move to private market in 2023, setting up market clash between Pfizer and Moderna. It says here, starting from January, 2023, HHS won't have enough federal funds

to support further distributions. Don O'Connell, HHS's assistant secretary, for preparedness and response said. So what better way to create a commercial market than to kind of punt this to the states, have the states mandate it in schools, now every kid has to take this to get into schools. You know how that goes.

There's your market. It just pops up like that. And it almost gives you a sense of the types of backroom deals that are going on here. Don't worry, even when we stop paying you, we will suddenly force through an authorization that will force everybody to go to you in the marketplace and then pay you themselves.

I mean, this is insane. And with the show we have coming up, I mean, you know, I don't want to give it away, but what's going on in Europe, an absolute just nuclear bomb has gone off in the investigation of the Pfizer vaccine specifically. And in light of that, what we're going to talk about to see us making this choice, the United States of America, it is so mind-blowing and shows such like catastrophically different perspectives on what is happening in the world today around this virus around this vaccine. It's really, it's why I said, I think this day, you just couldn't have more wrapped around this story. Right. And let's jump now. We're talking about vaccines and all the issues surrounding vaccines that we're continuing to discover. The same thing is happening with the antiviral Pax-Lovid. Now, if we remember in December of last year, 2021, the FDA approved Paxilovid. This was the headline from their own website. You can see the regulatory approval here. coronavirus update FDA authorizes first oral antiviral for treatment of COVID-19.

Now, what's interesting about this is on the back of that story, we know that the year prior to that there was an intense battle going on. Hydroxychloroquine had come out as antiviral. And you saw the WHO swoop in give tons of money for studies where they pack the studies with... I mean, let's be clear. We had Ford Medical Center do a powerful study, one of the greatest research centers in America coming forward and saying, saying our study shows a 50% reduction in death amongst those that receive hydroxychloroquine. That should have been it. That should have been the story. A product hydroxychloroquine is being used all around the world in people who aren't even in good health that suffer

from malaria, no problems there, no problems in all the other uses that are off label here in the United States of America. But all of a sudden, Tony Fauci thinks there's a problem with using this because it could cause some sort of heart arrhythmia, I think, was the entire excuse. I mean, literally took this product out of the hands of doctors like Dr. Paul Eric who has been on our show, who was leading his ICU, having a 50% also better result using products like hydroxychloroquine. We're going to talk about Ivermectin in a second. And so this was literally ripped out of the hands of doctors for the first time ever where

a bureaucratic agency, like FDA, made it impossible for a doctor in the middle of a virus that they said they knew nothing about, well, doctors aren't allowed to use what appears to be working in trials and studies and in hospitals all around the world. Right. And then so they did, you're about to talk about the study they did get behind. Yeah, the studies they did get behind. They were using potentially lethal doses. Right.

They were starting the therapies late, as we know with antivirals. You need to get on that right when you start showing symptoms. Yeah. Sabotaged hydroxychloroquine with lethal doses being used, I believe, is over 2,000 milligrams being used of hydroxychlorine queen in the solidarity trial and the recovery trial. When the doctors using it, we're using 400 milligrams, at most 600 milligrams. a day, I think it was 2,400 in one of these trials, literally four times in what is known as a lethal dose to make their points so they could pull it off the market. I mean, really,

really horrific stuff. And it didn't even stop there if you remember. We have the fraudulent data collection from the shadowy company called Surgesphere. That was published in the Lancet. The Lancet had to retract that. It was being called one of the biggest retractions of the past decade. That was complete an utter... You had like an adult model on the internet that was a part of the company and a science fiction writer that had put that entire fraudulent piece together and that's what tony fouchy ran with and so obviously attack on that attack on ivermectin yeah ivermectin they basically they saw kind of what happened the attack profile if you will with how they looked at hydroxychloricline

so they kind of decentralized that doctors all around the world were dosing their patients actually cities were dosing patients in in brazil the other places in south america and they were having wildly successful results yeah obviously this has been going uh and i'm Ivermectin is very cheap, it's a repurposed antiviral. It's the- Won the Nobel Prize for medicine in human beings, even though all the media tried to say it was a horse deworming pill.

No, it had won the Nobel Prize for how brilliant it was in using humans around the world. Right, and the safety profile is- The best there is. Yes. I mean, so many doctors saying, Ivermectin has no cross-reactivity with other drugs that we can see,

literally one of the safest drugs we'd ever see. Yes, and that story led to, the book by Dr. Peter Corey called The War on Iver. Which we are going to be releasing, I think, within the next 30 days or so. Right. So now let's look at the current headlines. And remember, Paxilobit has been out for well over a year. This is the go-to therapy of every hospital. Right. So we trash those.

Yes. But Pax-Lovids are shining star. This is what we're going to trust in. Yep. You're walking into an ER. You're walking into your doctor's office with symptoms. First couple days. You're going on Pax Lovit. This has been given to, I mean, countless of people. We had the president taking it. We had Anthony Fauci himself taking it. Don't I remember that both of them had the bounce back effect too where they said to have cleared they went back in public and then they're back in bed Yes days later because they had a rebound effect that was being pointed out by Pax Lovia Yeah, and that was found afterwards, you know, that's was something they found the Pax Lovit rebound

This was something that apparently now was common and now the media had to smooth that out a little bit because you're getting the symptoms again But now listen to this this is an article in CNN nonetheless. This is a big warning. They're finding out there's some big drug-to-drug interactions that they're calling not just mild severe here's the headlight line out of CNN. It says here, COVID-19 treatment Paxilovic can interact with common heart medications, doctors warn. Now, this was from a study, and this is what they said. The review paper says that interactions between Paxilovid and certain blood thinners can cause an increased risk of bleeding. So we're talking about the opposite of what the blood thinners are supposed to do. Interactions between Paxilovit and some cholesterol medications such as statins can be toxic to the liver, and interactions between Paxilovin and certain blood pressure medications can

cause low blood pressure, flushing, and swelling. These are, this is a big, big deal. And this review study was so important that the authors of the study put out their own press release saying, hey, doctors, you need to be concerned about this now. This isn't going to get buried in a medical journal. And so check this out. This is what they said. This was the actual press release.

COVID-19 drug-paxilovin may interact with common heart medications. And in there, they list a bunch of medications here. The anti-arrhythmic agents, anti-platlet agents and antiquagulants, statins, immunosuppressive agents. These are, and they're talking an exponential rise in toxicity in some of these. If you have these drug-to-drug interactions. And we heard about this from Dr. Pierre-Coree from the Freedom Fest panel that you were the host of. Yeah, we aired just last week. If anyone wants to see that, they just had to go back last week where he laid out how safe Ibramectin was.

This is what they loved about it. It didn't seem to have cross-reactions. He didn't even have to look it up. There was no list of cross-reactions with other drugs. Where is Pax-Lovid? And we're not just talking about some like free-reactin. drugs. We're talking about statins, heart, and blood. I mean, these are some of the most, you know, ubiquitous drugs used in, and therapies in the country. I mean, Del, before this show,

we're going over this, I'm going over these headlines. This is one of the most important shows I think we've done. I mean, tens of millions of Americans that are getting a drug that's being doled out like candy at the hospitals are now facing severe drug to drug interactions. So you're going to have to talk to your doctor if you're going in and you want this medication, because this is a really big deal. But perhaps one of the most shocking headlines, the most shocking developments. We're talking vaccines.

We're talking antivirals. Why are we needing these? Well, we need those because of COVID-19, of SARS-CoV-2. And some of the scientific consensus now is saying that this thing may have emerged or did emerge from a lab in Wuhan, from testing of a lab in Wuhan. So we still don't have the answers to this. And in comes this story out of Boston University. Take a look at this.

A new and deadly strain of the COVID virus has been created in a Boston University lab. A new COVID strain that has an 80% kill rate. The researchers at Boston University were able to combine the spike protein from Omocrine with the original strain of the virus that came out of Wuhan in order to create a new chimera strain which was so deadly that it killed 80% of the humanized mice that they were testing on. Researchers compared original COVID, Omicron, and a combined version of the virus. of the two to see what piece of the virus dictates how sick a person can get.

Then they tested this with large amounts of virus in mice. The school says these reports are sensationalized and taken out of context. They also say this research will provide a public benefit by leading to better targeted therapeutic interventions, which if you remember was the premise behind the original gain of function research. They enhanced the virus.

This is clearly gain of function research. The National Institute, for allergy and infectious diseases says BU should have reported this study to them. And it didn't, but BU says it didn't have to because the primary funds for the study was Boston University money. We can't keep on kind of fooling with viruses and make them more deadly. It has to be done very, very carefully. I mean, this term gain of function, no one had really paid attention to it unless you were geeking out a few years ago. But it really has been in the limelight.

or you know, is this virus out of Wuhan? Did it come from a gain of function in a, you know, a bio laboratory? Did it get accidentally released and then, you know, sweep the world? Now, you know, we have said that this potential bio weapon, if you will, didn't really have a very high death rate, as we pointed out earlier in the show when we're mandating vaccines, but it did sweep the world and it does have the world asking, should we be doing this kind of research? Right.

And we know about this because the NIH now, National Institutes of Health, Anthony Fauci's NIH, was funding EcoHealth Alliance. This is Peter Dazix organization that was working with the Wuhan Institute of Virology to do these gain of function research. And as we reported, just a couple weeks ago, all over the headlines, it was showing that the NIH is still funding grants to EcoHealth Alliance up to 2022 to the tune of over a million dollars in the past two years as well. So this is still happening. And so this. I remember Fauci's argument was, well, look, yes, while we are investigating, you. you know, the gain of function, you know, work done by eco-health,

what we're funding now isn't gain of function. It's just totally something different. So don't worry about it. We can still fund the same companies that are under investigation for other things. But this points out a serious problem in that thinking, right? Yeah, yeah, it does. And so this brings us to the now, the Boston University. Controversy is, I mean, this is the headlines coming out now.

If you look at these, it says Boston University researchers claim to have developed new, more lethal COVID-strain in lab. And let's look, was it secretive note? They actually did a pre-print article, so it's not peer-reviewed yet, but they published their findings. So people are look at this and going, wait a minute, this looks like gain of function. So let's look at that pre-print article right now. And one of the most important things I think about this is down at the funding, down at the bottom. And it says here, this work was supported by Boston University startup funds.

National Institutes of Health, NIAID grants. You can see two of those there. That's Tony Fauci, NIAID. It's what he's the head of. Yep. And then you go right to that bottom line. It says NIH-S-I-G grants. Now, this is for instrumentation, but it does show that they were funding that. There was funding involved in that. And since they were funding that, it should have went through a framework that was created to analyze if they can actually do this type of research. So, were they aware of it? Well, we go to Statt News now. And Staten News did some reporting to talk about this. And they actually talked to people from NIH. This is the headline Boston University of Research Testing of Lab-made version of COVID. virus draws government scrutiny. And it says here, it has become apparent that the research team did not clear the work with the National Institutes of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, which

was one of the funders of the project. The agency indicated it is going to be looking for some answers as to why it first learned of the work through media reports. It goes on to say, Emily Erbelding, director of NIAID's Division of Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, said the BU's team's original grant application did not specify. that the scientists wanted to do this precise work, nor did the group make clear that it was doing experiments that might involve enhancing a pathogen of pandemic potential in the progress reports it provided to the NIAID.

I mean, this is exactly the point when Fouch is saying, don't worry about it, we're funding eco-health to do something else. Do you know that? I mean, what they're showing you is they have no systems police this thing. Money's being used, and they're just building these, you know, super viruses in universities. I mean, it's crazy. And the researchers are arguing back from Boston University saying it's not gain a function

because the original Wuhan strain, the Washington strain, killed 100% of the rats they found, and the Amacron strain killed zero. But when they merged those two, because they took the spike protein from the Amacron, they put it on the Wuhan strain, that only killed 80% of the rats at that point. So they're saying we went from 100% kill rate to only 80%, but if you flip that over, you went from 0% kill rate to 80. So it depends how you're looking at that. Are they literally arguing that it's not gate of function, it's reduction of function in our laboratory?

Therefore, we should be exonerated because let's be honest, they didn't know that was going to be the result. They didn't know that it wouldn't like triple the original viruses until it was done. So I don't think, you know, whether the letter of the law, but certainly the intention of the law that say we're going to restrict you is don't do a study where you might accidentally, create a super virus that's more deadly than anything we've seen. And then one of you idiots or one of your assistants that just got into the university actually carries it out on their sleeve and delivers it to the whole world, which is some version of what we think happened in Wuhan. Right.

And the way it's supposed to work in the U.S., understand that the Obama White House in 2014 said, we've got to stop this gain of function research. It's getting out of control. It's Wild West. Stop to the MERS, the SARS, and influenza. We're done with it. We're putting a moratorium on it. And it restarted back in 2017. Anthony Fauci was very happy about that.

The only reason it restarted is because there was a framework, a very thorough framework when you read through it, put in place to funnel these potential studies through. And this is the framework right here. It says a framework for guiding funding decisions about proposed research involving. These are the words, enhance potential pandemic pathogens. That's to tell you it. It's a EPP. So it's supposed to go through a department level, department level research, basically. they bring people, they bring lawyers in, they bring ethicists in, they bring biosecurity people in,

and they all sit at a table and they say, can this be done safely? If it can, how do we mitigate the risk to that? None of that was been able, none of that was done at Boston University. They didn't even get a chance to do it. We weren't even sitting at the table to get that done. Wow. I mean, this is just in the face of, it's just, I mean, this whole day, this whole show, I think people's minds are going to be blown. All of the trust we've had that were being protected. that things are being done safely, that choices be made for the right reasons, that the scientific evidence and scientific proof and the scientific method and the leaders of science in the United States of America are handling this all well.

And in virtually every case, it's like the Titanic is sinking. Yeah, and one of the experts that's been very vocal about this is Dr. Richard Ebright, and he was quoted in an article, this is a Daily Mail article that the Boston University researchers were saying was blown out of proportion because the title here says, This is playing with fire. It could spark a lab-generated pandemic. Experts slam Boston lab where scientists have created a new deadly COVID strain with an 80% kill rate. In there, Dr. Ebright says, Dr. Ebright told Daily Mail, the research is a clear example of gain of function research of concern and enhance potential pandemic pathogens.

That's EPPPP research. He says it is especially concerning that this new U.S. government EPPP research, like the previous U.S. government EPPPB research, on Kamurik-S.-related coronaviruses that Wuhan Institute of Virology that may have caused the pandemic appears not to have undergone the prior risk benefit review mandated under US government policies. It's mandated. So now, Dela, we have basically Wuhan China, the Wuhan Institute of Virology in Boston, Massachusetts. Downtown Boston, we could have the same leak because people are not playing by the rules.

It's incredible reporting. Jeffrey, we're going to get back together in just a little while to really talk about the explosive testimony happening at the EU as we speak. At the same time, this unfortunate event has happened at the CDC and the United States of America. Virtually the opposite is underway in Europe. We're going to get into those details and what it really, the picture it paints of this moment we find ourselves in. But first, let me talk about, you know, when we, we've been watching the weather over the last several years, have you heard this term of bomb cyclone? Well, there's also a media bomb

cyclone. We may be watching one today, but just over a week ago, that media bomb cyclone hit the coast of Florida. And the irony of this story is mind-blowing and the power of it. Take a look at this. The new recommendation from the Florida Surgeon General. The Florida Department of Health has announced new guidance regarding MRNA COVID-19 vaccines. Florida Surgeon General is recommending that some men not get the MRNA COVID vaccine. Dr. Joseph Latipo took to Twitter saying new analysis, quote, showed an increased risk of cardiac-related death amongst men 18 through 13. Their analysis found there's an 84% increase in relative incidents of cardiac-related deaths within 28 days following getting the MRNA vaccine.

The tweet was reportedly taken down on Saturday for violating Twitter's policies and then restored later that morning. Twitter also suspended Dr. Lodapos' account. There was an outcry and Twitter later reversed the decision. Holding back information like this from people has a very, what are you hiding kind of quality? kind of quality to it. Twitter isn't the only one weighing in on this guidance from Florida Surgeon General. The Food and Drug Administration is also criticizing the data. Lodapo says that many are hoping that the vaccine-related cardiac adverse events will just go away.

This isn't going away. This is real. I mean, how about this for a juxtaposition, you know, just days before our own CDC mandates the COVID-19 vaccine or at least puts it in line to be mandated across the country, as a part of the school schedule. The Surgeon General in Florida does a study and comes out with Rhonda Santis behind him, the governor, saying we are not recommending this vaccine for young males especially. It is no longer even recommended. And in many ways, we are warning against it.

I mean, what an incredible time we're in. You could not have more differing perspectives. And so he is the author of Transcend Fear, this amazing, book, Dr. Joseph Ladoopo just wrote and I had a great interview with him recently about it, but he's also the author of this incredible guidance coming out of Florida. I had an opportunity earlier to speak with him prior to us knowing that the CDC was going to mandate this COVID vaccine. This is an interview that should not be forgotten. Watch this. Dr. Lodipo, thank you for taking the time today.

Hey, thanks, Del. Anytime. You know, we're so used to, and even I am so used to there being this very careful approach to the discussion about, you know, potential vaccine injury that I think this is one of the first times in media history as I know it, where a sitting surgeon general or really any politician authority has made a definitive statement coming out to the public saying, we believe there is a risk here. Let me just go ahead and give this guidance and we'll get into it. This is what was put out in Florida by you, Dr. Joseph Ladoopo, Surgeon General of Florida. Exploring the relationship between all cause and cardiac related mortality following COVID-19 vaccination or infection in Florida residents, a self-controlled case series study. This is what the discussion and conclusion was in this statewide study of vaccinated Florida residents aged 18 years or older. COVID vaccination was not associated with an elevated risk for all cause mortality.

COVID-19 vaccination was associated with a modestly increased risk for cardiac-related mortality 28 days following vaccination. Results from the stratified analysis for cardiac-related death following vaccination suggests MRNA vaccination may be driving the increased risk in males, especially among males aged 18 to 39. Risk for both all-cause and cardiac-related deaths was substantially higher 28 days following COVID-19 infection. The risk associated with MRNA vaccination should be weighed against the risk. associated with COVID-19 infection, and then really the guidance that went out to Florida looks something like this. Guidance for MRNA COVID-19 vaccines, very specifically, it says the state surgeon general now recommends against the COVID-19 mRNA vaccines for males ages 18 to 39 years old. Individuals and health care providers should also be aware that this analysis found.

Males over the age of 60 had a 10% increased risk of cardiac-related death within 28 days of MRNA vaccination. Non-MRNA vaccines were not bound to have these increased risks among any population. Those are huge statements, a really somewhat scary study when we think about how many young men have received this vaccination. So let's start with why did you decide to do this analysis, to do this study of the individuals in Florida? Del, we decided to do the study, and I did direct the Department of Health to do the study, because as you know, and as many people have recognized, there's literally this unending propaganda campaign pushing these vaccines on every living being on this planet and ignoring any message or any signal that says otherwise. It is just such a indescribably corrupt environment in terms of morality, in terms of benevolence, and actually in terms of public health, and actually caring about the outcomes that people

experience and improving their health. And that's why we did this study, because in that kind of environment, there's so much suspicion that it creates because of the fact that there's so much dishonesty that being able to ask questions that should have already been asked is something that is the least of what we could do and what we should be doing. And it really is a shame that no one else has done it, but you can count on the Florida Department of Health to continue making honest assessments. Now, when you looked at this issue of cardiac death, was that the only issue? Was this study specific to that?

Or were you looking at several health issues, but this was the one that stood out? So I want to say, first of all, that what my role in the study was directing my team, tech, look at our data and ask the question. That was my role of study. And it was performed by biostatisticians, epidemiologists. epidemiologists who are expert with the data that we have in Florida and are expert with these methods, which, by the way, is a very standard method. There's been so much, so many attempts over these past few weeks to make it look as though this method hasn't been used in hundreds of published

studies. It has. Right. That somehow there's something else going on. No, there's nothing else going on. So anyway, I want to clarify that. And what I did ask my team to do was to look at overall mortality. And cardiac-related mortality is something that others have looked at. And that was part of the study design. That's what the extent of this study was in terms of the questions that we asked. But very obviously, there should be other questions that are being asked. There have been other signals for other adverse events that have been detected. And just pretending that everything's okay doesn't serve the public interest very obviously. It certainly doesn't serve public health.

Well, I mean, and we've covered this extensively on the high wire when it comes to myocarditis and, you know, blood clotting, things like this, all things that affect the heart that could lead to a cardiac arrest and cardiac death. What I find shocking is how quickly, you know, the FDA wants to say, you know, this isn't true or, but they knew. We know they've known. We've been watching what the CDC is looking at as they've approved this vaccine for children. We know that they know there is an heightened risk of, you know, a cardiac incident of some kind. We have talked to talk to Dr. Peter McCullough, the world-renowned heart specialist who's been more published than the other heart specialist.

specialists in the world. So it's not like you were just blindly shooting at some target out there hoping it hit something. The real question has been how big a risk? You know, I mean, because the entire conversation of vaccines has always been the risk-reward benefit ratio. And that's really what you were looking at, right? We're starting because we've been watching this virus for over two years now. We have a pretty good sense of the risk to children, which is at a 0% and those under the age of 18, certainly. But, you know, what is the actual risk? And for them to just act like this is preposterous that you would even look at it, it's not in their own data. They've been seeing a rise and trying to discount it. And by the way, one of the things I've found shocking

is the studies sort of done at the CDC and the FDA that we're looking at have a lower rate of incidents than virtually every other study on this topic around the world. So we seem to be an anomaly in America compared to the results we're seeing coming out of Japan and, and, you know, other places. So when you did the study, how many people were a part of, you know, of the grouping that you were looking at? What type of data was available to you in Florida? Sure. And I, you're absolutely correct, Del. And I don't know if this is something you've shared with your audience, but in fact, the FDA has released documents that indicate that in the Medicare population, there is an increased risk of acute myocardial infarction, which is heart attacks,

specifically associated with the MRNA COVID-19 vaccines. So these findings are not in a vacuum. And of course, the people who are just so eager to find some way to pretend that the findings aren't real or aren't there are ignoring the fact that this was the only age group that that finding was in. Is our study definitive? It's not definitive. but considering all the smoke that there already is. Other studies have been performed, including a study in scientific reports that's showing an association between MRNA COVID-19 vaccination

and acute cardiac events in young people and the myocarditis studies. How do you dismiss this type of finding? We only do that if you're not really interested in the truth, if you're really more interested in an agenda. And more and more Americans are wading up to that fast. Dale, I got so excited that I don't remember the exact question you wanted to ask me. Okay, so I mean, so the question is you said, you know, first of all, you said the study that was not definitive, but it was definitive enough for you to make a guidance recommendation in Florida.

What were the numbers, you know, that you were looking at? What type of pool was available to you in Florida to look at? I've heard some statements as low as well. he made this decision based on 20 people. Oh, gosh. What is the sort of pool you're working with? Yeah, yeah. Yeah, people will do whatever they can to try and undermine something.

So what we did, we actually looked at all Florida data. So this was all Florida vaccine data, COVID-19 vaccine data, and all Florida, all Florida COVID-19 death data, and all Florida COVID-19 test result data. So that's overall what we looked at. And one of the things about the study method, this self-controlled case series design, is that the idea is that if a vaccine or a medication or whatever

doesn't change the likelihood of something happening. In this specific case, we looked at death, then the timing of that exposure, that vaccine, that medication, should not affect the timing of the outcome that you're looking at. That makes sense. So for that reason, and again, this method has been used in hundreds of studies. So for that reason, the study is actually limited to the rare, essentially unusual scenario where someone has an exposure and dies.

For older people, there were thousands, unfortunately, thousands of people who fell in this category. So we estimated one of the things that didn't get much attention is the fact that we estimated about a 10% increase in cardiac death in older men. And there were thousands of people in this age group. So that estimate has a lot of precision with it. In younger people, fortunately, it's not common for younger people to die. Yeah. So the sample size is smaller. Yeah. And in total, there were 77 young. men who met the study criteria in terms of having the vaccine, having an MRN or another COVID-19 vaccine, and dying within a six-month period.

Okay. And only in that group and in the older men group were deaths more concentrated in the 28 days after COVID-19 vaccination. So the idea is that whatever the number is, whether it was 77, whether it was 177 or whether it was even half of 77. If the frequency of events is concentrated next to an exposure, that very obviously gives you information about the relationship, potential relationship

between the exposure and the event. Yeah, all right, I got it. And so, and that's alarming. And just because on the other side, they tend to throw around relative risk, and then, you know, actual risk, as, as, you know, ways that we look at this. The relative risk being in this group, if you got this, you're increasing your risk of having an event by, what was the actual percentage in the end that you had to do?

The estimate was 84%, but it could be as low as 5% or as high as something around 200%. Got it. Because the sample size wasn't large. Right. But still, I mean, and to your point, and this has always been the issue with this, it's a signal, a signal that our own CDC and FDA just seem to be avoiding completely, even though they write about it, even though studies are coming around in from around the world, and your study is just one of many that are pointing to the exact same issue.

So let me ask you now, because in real time, moments from right now as we're having this conversation, the CDC will be voting on whether to add this COVID-19 vaccine to the childhood schedule, the recommended childhood scheduled by the CDC, which is mandated. That schedule is mandated in every state in the United States of America. Many of the states have some way to opt out of that mandate. But for you, sitting as a leader in the sort of, do I say political side of health, you know, you're involved in the government, you're watching the federal government now, the agency, the CDC that's making this recommendation, about to potentially recommend a vaccine that you just said goes against, you know,

what is going to go against the guidance from Florida? What are your feelings on that vote right now and the people that are about to make it? Well, it's, you know, it's, it's, people have been so disconnected from reality. And this isn't the first time. We saw it with the lockdowns. We saw it with these protracted school shutdowns that were that people like Dr. Fauci and others insisted were necessary and important and valuable. We saw it with the silly vaccine passports and the that's just so sad, pitiful, and heartbreaking scenario of asking little kids for like their papers before they entered a restaurant. So this is this is an extension of that in terms of that disconnection.

from what the data are showing and not even a little bit. The data are very, very clearly indicating. And we didn't even, we didn't talk. I didn't mention just another piece of the puzzle, which is the increasing evidence for subclinical myocarditis in young people from these MRA COVID-19 vaccines, which by the way is hypothesized to be one of the mechanisms by which they may be increasing cardiac related deaths.

Not just people showing up to the hospital, there are other people who are very likely experiencing some degree of heart injury from these MRNA COVID-19 vaccines. Right. So them voting on this, it's just, it's a continuation of the disconnection between data and reality and between, frankly, morality and some other agenda that doesn't have anything to do with putting the, the rights or the, or the, for the, the, the, the, the, the, the, the, the, the health of humans first.

This is another agenda-based nonsense move. Frankly, they beat themselves into a corner because they've been screaming safe and effective, irrespective of the data. So I don't think they have much of a choice but to approve this for the routine childhood vaccination. And I think the good thing is that parents are voting with their feet.

They know, they know something. something is up. They do not trust these people. They have not gotten their little children vaccinated, despite these ridiculous calls from Dr. Olensky and Dr. Fauci to do it. And I don't think they're going to get anywhere. I think so let's see what they do. But I think the parents are going to, I don't I don't see parents backing up because they, they, every day more and more people recognize that the fixes in and these individuals who are leading our federal response. do not have your best interests in mind. Well, let me ask you then a more specific question, and I think that you're right. It really is unfortunate that our regulatory agencies who we used to trust, now we are being forced into a position where we cannot trust them. More and more science around the world we're going to get into,

I think, one of the most explosive issues coming out of Europe now, coming around the efficacy of the vaccine, whether that was ever properly tested. But I want to ask you this as surgeon, general Florida. If this afternoon the CDC ends up, you know, passing or deciding that this will be added to the childhood schedule, we will be in a totally different place in this country. We will no longer be in a position where, you know, it's a recommendation, but you can walk away from it. We have been fighting state-by-state school boards that tried to put this COVID vaccine, perhaps

in their area, onto the schedule, and we've won because it goes against federal mandate, things like that. But once this is a federal mandate, there will be children that will not be able to go to school. This is going to change the entire environment of this country. Let me ask you this specifically. If the CDC this afternoon votes to add the COVID-19 vaccine to the childhood schedule, will Florida find itself in a position that it will be going against the now recommended CDC schedule that most people use to define whether you get to go in school or not? Do you see yourself in a position that you'll have to say we are not going to in Florida enforce the CDC guideline. I think a snowflake has a better chance in hell than Governor Ron DeSantis or myself somehow

changing our position on these vaccines. It is it is such a simple and clear moral issue. You either prioritize humans or you don't. And that's not going to change with me. It's certainly not going to change with him. Nothing's going to change here in Florida, regardless of what they do. Well, that is music to my ears. And for anyone that may be shocked by your position, then they haven't read this book. Transcend Fear. You want to know what's really driving, Dr. Lattapo and the brilliant work that you're doing there. The book is amazing. I think it's good for all of us to recognize in our own lives because we will be tasked with us. If we're not living in Florida, there are many parents that are going to have to face this decision. What do

I do now? You know, I'm afraid. I'm afraid. What do I do with my kids? Can they get their education? So, you know, a forceful fear is upon us from our government making decisions that are now not in our best interest. That's why I think it's so brilliant, you know, what you've put in your book here. Transcend fear. Everybody check it out. Dr. Lattapote, thank you for sticking with the truth and the guidance. And, you know, my prayer is that one day we see you and other. like you rising to positions and authority, not just in Florida. Obviously, state by state would be great, but to a federal level so that we can get back on track for how science is supposed to be done.

Thanks, Del. We will get back on track. All right. Take care. Okay, thanks, Del. A snowflake has a better chance in hell than a mandate by the CDC of the COVID vaccine on the childhood vaccine in Florida. that interview prior to the vote, which was a 15 to zero unanimous vote. And in real time now, as we speak, this news is sweeping this country, probably the world, fresh out of Florida, just as promised by Dr. Joseph Lattapo, the Surgeon General. We now have this text coming from

Ron DeSantis. As long as I am governor, in Florida, there will not be a COVID-19 vaccine mandate for children in our schools. I am sure if there had been any slowing of the move to Florida, it will be reinvigorated. California, New York, places like that that are sure to mandate this vaccine. We'll be looking to states like Florida, hopefully where I'm at in Texas, will stand strong here too. I mean, and to be clear, the CDC's excuse right now for this egregious action, this egregious assault on humanity for the benefit. of a pharmaceutical company to make billions of dollars on a product that is failing, and wait till you see the bombshells. We're about to deliver to you coming out of Europe at this exact same moment. It is literally crumbling down in Europe, and I believe that tidal wave will hit America.

It's unfortunate. We're going to be behind the ball in this because of our own CDC. But this moment is outrageous that we find ourselves in. But before we get to that, I want to take this opportunity because I know we have many new eyes, maybe days from the moment this has happened, that are now reviewing this, because I know many of you are going to say, this is the perfect show to show my friends that have really been on the fence. They still want to believe in this program. They still want to believe in the CDC. They're having serious questions about the CDC. That's why we are making this show a complete and total time capsule to fully help people understand exactly where we were, the science that was going on, what the realizations were in Europe

as opposed to those realizations happening in the CDC. And right now, as we just saw in Florida, a totally and completely different perspective. In many ways, we'll see the division of states probably around this discussion. But I want to take this moment because we're about to deliver what I say will maybe be the biggest I told you so

in high wire history, not because we like to gloat because it's important for everyone to know what was the known knowns and the known unknowns, as it's been said before. It's been here, and we have been on this. We haven't had to retract our statements. We doubled and tripled down, and now we're being proven right at levels that are incomprehensible.

What I want to say to you, all of you out there, that when you watch this show and you watch what's taking place here, we are not funded by Exxon. We are not funded by Pfizer. We're not funded by Moderna, like every news station you are watching that has been lying to you, been. We didn't have to lie to you because no one was forcing us to lie to you. We were giving you the truth and you're about to see how clear we were on that truth. I also want to point out

that not only do we have this brilliant nonprofit, the informed consent action network that makes this show possible, the high wire is only the educational program produced by the informed consent action network, our nonprofit, that is your nonprofit, that you fund that makes all this possible. Not only we doing this, we have the most powerful and successful legal team in the arena of vaccination that exists on earth. No one has been more successful than Aaron Siri. Here is a list of his wins and working for us. Everything from lawsuits that have won against the FDA, the CDC, the National Institute of Health, Health and Human Services. We won cases like we brought down the law in Washington, D.C. that mandated that a child at the age of 12,

could opt in and get a vaccine without parental approval. And that law made it so that these teachers were mandated to lie to the parents that the child had gotten the vaccine. The insurance company was mandated to create a false billing document that the parents received so that they wouldn't know their child got the vaccine. And then the school was mandated to create a fake vaccine record that the parents would see, unlike the real one that the school had, literally creating this cabal against parents in Washington, D.C. We brought that crashing down amongst a myriad of other legal wins that we've had. If you've been watching the highway, you know all about that.

I say this because now more than ever, in this moment, I am promising you right now upon this CDC announcement and upon the 15 to 0 vote that put the COVID vaccine on childhood schedule, ICANN has now made it its personal mission to sue in. every state that attempts to mandate this as a requirement to get into school. We will be the leading legal team on this. It is going to cost a fortune and we need your help. So not only we're producing this show, we are fighting for you, we don't just report on the news, we make the news, we don't just stand by and tell you, oh, woe, is me. We are actively involved in the fight. We are successful at it. So today, when we talk about how do we make this possible, you make

this possible, all of you out there that have been donating to I can to me. make all of this possible so that we would find ourselves in this position, a position where the CDC now looks bad, they are cornered, they have no way out. We have been all over them, and we are going to show you how the world is turning on them. This conversation of vaccines didn't really even exist. No one was having it prior to the high wire, and just before that, when I put out the documentary Vax, which puts me in the middle of this. So your voice is working through us. That force is coming through your support of us. And today I have a very special opportunity to present to you. For those of you that have been watching the high wire, I've been thinking, you know, when they

announce these legal wins, when they bring down these laws that look like they're going to take away our rights, for me it's just the news because I'm watching it. But for all of those that are supporting I can, they get to say I did that. I was actually actively involved. Even $1 a month gives you the opportunity to say, I made a difference. I made change starting with myself. I invested in what I believe was the truth in making a difference in this world. That's what the people donating to our nonprofit are getting to experience. And today, a very special offer.

We have a family that has reached out to us and that is giving us the opportunity to double your donation. All gifts made this month will be matched up to $100,000. So for those of you that get involved in donating, when that first 100,000 comes in, it will be matched by this beautiful family and their foundation. I want to read the letter. They want to remain anonymous, so we've redacted some of the names and things. I want to read this letter to you because I think this is really important. This is from this family, a small charitable family foundation that has donated to many worthy causes over the years. A decision has been made to close the foundation at the end of 2022 and distribute the assets to the nonprofits that are most important to the remaining family members. I can was at the top of our personal list and is receiving the largest single donation from our portion of the funds.

It is largely due to your excellent reporting that we were able to convince parents to say no. In fact, I think it said our parents to say no to the COVID shots in spite of the immense pressure they were under from their doctors, relatives and friends. They both survived their bout with COVID using ivermectin and other protocols that they were first introduced to via the high wire. As more information comes to light about deaths and severe disabilities from the shots, they are extremely grateful that they chose to just say no. And we are so grateful to still have them with us at their ages in good health. on a final by the way those parents were in their mid-90s that survived COVID using the protocols presented here on the show on a final note dell is so right when he talks about how great it feels every week to know that by donating we had a hand in making the show and the legal efforts possible we definitely get that feeling from making a monthly donation however it's in an order of magnitude more wonderful to have the means to facilitate a matching campaign like this one and raise some big money for i can we're so excited that's excited to be able to have this impact and we wish you all our very best as we fight this battle for medical freedom together. Such a beautiful letter and I want to thank this family and their foundation for this generous gift.

And I want to thank all of you that are going to take this opportunity to become a part of what is now a battle upon us. I have said it. I told you this wasn't going away. They weren't going to give up. It doesn't matter that the pandemic is over. It doesn't matter that Amacron is a nothing burger. It doesn't matter that your children were never at risk. They are now going to actively put your children at risk. Children will be murdered by this decision made by Asip at the CDC.

We know that now as a fact, given the history of myocarditis and all the other issues that are wrapped around this horrible, untested vaccine. We will be fighting for you. We will be bringing you the truth every day. and you're about to see how we, how clear we were throughout COVID when nobody else was. So please take this opportunity to become an active participant in your life instead of just a watcher. Go to the high wire, hit donate to I can, click on that. We would love it if you would become a recurring donor today. We're asking for $22 for 2022. We've made it easy for you. That's a QR code. You can take a picture of it right now. It will take it right there. Or text us at 17.

to 022 and write in donate and you will immediately be given a link to make this possible. Of all the things that you donate to in the world, I want you to ask yourself, is there anything more important than our children and the future of our species? We have given to a lot of things, I'm sure, but now this is upon us and I want you to know we will be leading the fight as we have all the way through to end this insanity and take us to a more brilliant and shining place of scientific integrity and true modern medicine. Okay, that's available all through the month, so please, you know, take advantage of that. Now, to begin this conversation, to really fully frame what is going on today, right now, in the world, an explosion, a nuclear

bomb has gone off in Europe. I'm going to talk to Jeffrey Jackson about it, but first, let's remember what we were told in the news when they first brought this vaccine upon us. This is what that sounded like. Major news in the race for a COVID-19 vaccine. The drug giant Pfizer said yesterday that its vaccine candidate was more than 90% effective. 95% effective. Close to 95% efficacy. 95% effective against COVID-19. 94.5% effective in preventing COVID. 19. 95% effective at preventing cases of COVID-19. 95% effective. So I think this is a really strong step forward to where we want to be about getting control of this outbreak. Now for those who've been watching the high wire for the last two years, refrain from giving away the punchline.

We are going to deliver the greatest I told you so of all times based on everything that has been stated right there. But we, we are. We all know. I mean, I think most people now watching this, doesn't matter if you've gotten the vaccine or not, you're saying yourself, well, I know that's not true. That proved to not be true because everyone that got this vaccine has now caught COVID. To get to that conversation and what's really happening around the world is astronomical. I'm joined now.

Once again, Jeffrey, welcome to the interview set here at the Highwire. I'm looking forward to this conversation. It may be, I think this may be, I've said it before, the most important show we've ever done in light of this vote that we just discussed by ASIP, but there's been a change in the languaging and the support of this idea of the 95% effective vaccine. Yeah, and one of the places you're seeing this change in a big way is in the media reporting, the actual individuals reporting on this. And one of the biggest people of influence was Pierce Morgan. Let's take a look just last summer at how he looked at this, this conversation, this topic. We'll go to his Twitter page. And he had some tweets that he put out.

This was in the summer of 2021. He says, love, he loves the idea of COVID vaccine passports for everywhere, flights, restaurants, clubs, football, gyms, shops, et cetera. It's time COVID-denying anti-vaxxer lunis had had their expletive blood. called and bar themselves from going anywhere that responsible citizens go. Now he didn't stop there. Wow, I mean that's outrageous. Looney's I want to lock everybody down. You should be basically prisoners in your house if you don't have a vaccine passport. I mean, and look, and not only what he wasn't standing out, he was being inspired by government and health agencies

to talk to those that disagreed with him in exactly that manner. He felt perfectly comfortable. It's okay to talk down to these people. They're second-class citizens. They're dirty. They're putting me at risk. Reminds me of some of the things that might have been said in early Nazi Germany. Right. And as you say, he loves the idea. I mean, this is like the biggest medical, if you will, authoritarian push on the people. And he loves this idea. It's not, hey, maybe we we should try this out. Just full in, I love it. Let's go to it. Let's go to months later. He's still singing the same tune on Twitter. This is what he had to tweet. It says, those who refuse to vaccinated with no medical reason not to should be refused NHS care if they then catch COVID.

I'm hearing of anti-vaxers using up ICU beds in London at vast expense to the taxpayer. Let them pay for their own stupidity and selfishness. Boy, I mean, that's nothing short of wishing people death. Right. Like, I want you to die, die if you didn't get this vaccine. I don't know what he would think. What about all the people that had gotten the vaccine? It was failing and they found themselves in the hospital. Or how about those that are having myocarditis? that is being reported as connected this, having heart issues, what should they do? I mean, outrageous.

I mean, this is the level of sickness and rage that was being pointed at those of us that were saying, look, the science doesn't add up. I'm not doing this. We're not loonies. We were following science, which is what we're going to talk about. But, I mean, literally to say, I hope you die, you should be barred from entering a hospital. It's a poorly thought out point. Say the least.

It's not researched and it's inhumane. Let's just say it's inhumane. And it's coming from someone that holds a position of influence and power in the media to sway. He wasn't the architect of what was happening, but he's becoming one of the biggest cheerleaders of it. After putting out those texts, this is what Pierce Morgan is now saying and shifting his tune. It seemed to me, Neil, that when this was all happening in the pandemic, I took quite firm views throughout it, like a lot of people, I guess. one of which was when it was believed when the vaccines first came along

that they would stop transmission. It seemed to me if you refused to be vaccinated, you shouldn't be entitled to the same rights to dinner to go to nightclubs and stuff as those who'd taken the vaccine and were therefore not able to transmit it. However, when it was established that vaccines actually didn't stop transmission,

they just stopped a lot of people getting very sick and dying, the argument to then suppress any liberties or freedoms of the unvaccinated, to me, it went away. Because in that instance, if the ability to pass it on is pretty well the same, whether you're being jabbed or not, then really it's down to the individual if they want to protect themselves from this virus. So I changed my mind.

I got pilloried when I said my original statement. I got pilloried when I changed my mind. I got pilloried like everybody in this pandemic about all of it. And yet to me, it seemed perfectly logical, honestly, to just change my mind because facts change. You know, behind the scenes with our team as we were like watching this video, we have some mixed, I would say, perspectives.

On the one hand, you know, I've been saying, I appreciate it when people are able to admit that they're wrong, especially people that are, you know, public presences. Geraldo Rivera had a big Miaculpa in the middle of this. Similarly, when he finally got COVID saying, I'm sorry, I said some very harsh things. We're seeing that from peers here. I guess it's not for us to decide.

I don't think it's for me to decide how Pierce's Morgan should be judged. He did wish death on people, and now he's retracting that because he saw that, as he is saying, the science changed. And Neil deGrasse Tyson, that was what the conversation was. Well, the science changed on us, and we all have to get used to the fact that we can't hold the CDC accountable because the science has always changed, which is a huge part of this conversation. So I'm glad that he has shifted his perspective there. But he said some nasty things, and, you know, I think history will have to decide. It's sort of like, hey, I thought having slaves was a good idea.

Then I grew out of it. I realized maybe that wasn't such a good idea. I thought wishing death on people that hadn't gotten this untested product was loony and should, you know, they deserve whatever they got. Now I'm kind of changing that perspective. But I want to say this. His argument is the one that should have been against mandating this vaccine under the childhood schedule. It doesn't stop transmission. Therefore, the entire argument that you're going to protect, you know, that immune-suppressed child of school is gone.

It's gone. The entire purpose of a mandated vaccine to create herd immunity does not exist in this vaccine. And so I hope people like him and that language gets to be the cacophony that it should be because that is the argument against why anyone would mandate this crappy vaccine on anyone. And to the fundamental of it, he says, to restrict someone's fundamental liberties and freedom, There should be no conversation that we have that anyone can put forward that will do that for an individual So he's saying well because it stopped transmission. I thought it was okay to do this to people So that's that's something that should be taken away and really looked at but you know what we're talking about here is as

As these people kind of Rotated out we had the CEO of Pfizer Albert Borla he stepped in to be the main mouthpiece of the public health response I mean he's literally the last guy you want giving public health advice because he's he has literally the most to gain on this planet from you taking his shots. Billions of dollars off of this vaccine. Absolutely. And what we saw from Albert Bula was a very narrowly focused narrative. So instead of talking about vaccine, passports and all of these other things, he focused on the efficacy of the vaccine and the transmission.

Take a look at what he had to say. All right. There are a lot of indications right now that are telling us that there is a protection against against transmission of the disease. With all the data have collected so far, there is no variant that we have identified that escapes the protection of our vaccine. This vaccine, and that was the first vaccine administer

against COVID, to come now with a treatment of 90% effectiveness. You know, personally makes me a lot, very proud about the scientists that we have and the people at Pfizer that were able to make that happen. You know, as I watched that, you can study body language on when someone's lying. It's like a tell, right?

and he's like, you know, 90%, you know, like just short of going 90% effective, like he knows that there's something in. But so obviously we're taking it back now. We're taking it back from this moment we're in where everyone in the world seems to recognize that that didn't prove to be true, but he had no problem stating that as the CEO of Pfizer,

evidence shows that this is going to protect you stop transmission. Right, so we're ratcheting this story up if people are paying attention. So it's not just Pierce Morgan, it's not just these other people. Now with the CEO of Pfizer jumping and saying these things, big statements. He even took to Twitter. He had some tweets.

This is when they were trying to get the EUA for kids. And this is what he had to say about this. This was in the summer of 2021. He said, although data shows that severe COVID-19 is rare in children, widespread vaccination is a critical tool to help stop transmission. Even back then it was rare in children. That's why I'm excited we have begun dosing participants age 5 to 11 in a global phase 2-3 study of the Pfizer biointech COVID-19 vaccine. And he went on further to even double down. on that on Twitter with another tweet and he said this excited to share that

update analysis from our phase three study with bio and tech also shows that our COVID-19 vaccine was a hundred percent effective imagine that in preventing COVID-19 cases in South Africa a hundred percent he says he's a very excited man about this wow the first time we've ever heard of any pharmaceutical product being a hundred percent successful I mean it really is unbelievable how far away that ended up being from truth and where we now find ourselves. But so now we're here. Yeah. Now we're here. That, you know, that was in the past, but now Pfizer finds itself in the middle of a conversation he

does too. Tell me what's happening. And so let's fast forward to present day here. Okay. And this is some big things happening out of Europe. So in March of 2022, the European Parliament basically unanimously voted to create an investigative panel to look into the COVID-19 response. And what this was going to do is look at, you know, can we learn some lessons about this? Where was our money going? How was it spent? Was it spent wisely? And who did they ask to come testify at this panel?

Albert Borla himself, the person that has no problem going all over the media, showing up at any immediate interview to talk about its product. Well, there was a problem. He couldn't make it. He pulled out. He did not want to show up there. This was the headline out of Politico. Pfizer CEO pulls out of testifying to EU Parliament

COVID-19 panel. He sent a woman named Janine Small. She's another president in Pfizer to take his place. And she was up there and she was grilled by a member of the European Parliament named Robert Rose. And this is how it went. Take a look. Was the Pfizer-COVID vaccine tested on stopping the transmission of the virus before it entered the market? If not, please say it clearly. If yes, are you willing to share the data with this committee? And I really want a straight answer. Yes or no, and I'm looking forward to it.

Thank you very much. Regarding the question around, did we know about stopping humanisation before it's entered the market? No. We had to really move at the speed of science to really understand what is taking place in the market. From that point of view, we had to do everything at risk. The speed of science.

You know, we are going to name this show, the speed of science. It's one of the most ridiculous terms I've ever heard, especially when what she's talking about is rushing science, which is the dumbest thing you can ever do. But this just blew up. This was just over a week ago. You pretty much have to have your head burying the sand and pour cement around your shoulders to not have heard that this is going on. It's being shared by millions around the world.

It's a shocking realization for everybody that hasn't been watching the high wire. Let's be clear about that and we're going to talk in more detail about this. But at first I thought, what is the big deal, right? I mean, everyone already knew, as Pierce Morgan is saying, he knows that it doesn't stop transmission. Therefore, I shouldn't be attacking the anti-divactions any longer. But it occurs to me now, as I've watched this a few times, what's different here is Piers Morgan and Tony Fauci and all these people. that are in the media have been trying to spin the story that the science changed on us,

that it went through this, you know, natural mutation itself, where we were just trying to figure out what's going on, trying to catch up with it, and therefore you have to accept that, yeah, we got it wrong in some of the places, and Tony Fauci is on a giant apology tour now, but what this tells us is that's a lie. What this statement now says is, you always knew you couldn't say it stopped transmission.

You always knew you weren't there. You didn't think it did and then get surprised. It wasn't the mutation of Amacron or something that got around it. She's saying, we never tested for that. Literally the definition of a vaccination being, it creates immunity so I can't pass it on. You never achieved this product could do this when you mandated in the world. I mean, it really is quite shocking.

It certainly is shocking to the folks. Europe and Robert Roos. Right. And so that admission in that testimony, although it was not legally binding, has hit the zeitgeist. It's gone all over the world. It's even come over the pond, as they say, to our media and Tucker Carlson, who interviewed Robert Rose right after that. This is what it looked like. Okay. It really was a special moment. For the first time, Pfizer admitted that the vaccine was not tested on stopping the transmission of the virus when it entered the market. And this has massive implications. Governments pushed millions of people worldwide to get vaccinated by telling them,

by telling you to do it for your grandmother. And they tricked perfectly healthy young people into taking this jab using false arguments. And they used big words such as antisocial to solve an immense hatred against people who refused to comply with the government's wishes. And even worse, many governments, including mine, actually, introduced so-called COVID passports. These passports made access to parts of society conditional. Those who did not wish to get vaccinated lost that access,

not being able to visit a restaurant or a gym, all in the name of public health. Our governments love to talk about institutional discrimination, but this was real institutional discrimination. In many countries, like the US and Italy, vaccine mandates were introduced for certain. professions. Many people lost their job, their livelihood, their business because they stood by their principles. Austria even had a lockdown for the unvaccinated because of this reason. The government

literally imprisoned people within their own homes. All of this was based on the idea that vaccination helps prevent the spread of the virus. Otherwise, why should people out of society? But this has now proven to be a big lie. Even the president of for international development market of Pfizer now admits that there was no scientific basis to say vaccination would stop the transmission of the virus. And I find this one of the biggest scandals of our time. I think he's absolutely right. I think this and I have said exactly that over the last couple years. This will prove to be one of the greatest scandals of all times. It will go down as one of the greatest scientific blunders in history.

as Gert Vanne Bosch has described it, a colossal blunder. Institutional, you know, segregation. And this idea that it was okay, as he said, to assault people, to put them down, to segregate them out of society, based on this premise that this product was protecting grandma, protecting those outside of ourselves, being promised that it stopped transmission. I want to take this moment very quickly,

because I know that there are brand new people watching this show, Jeffrey, and what I've been mind-blown by is the amount of people that got this vaccine because they were told it's 95% effective at keeping you from getting the virus, and therefore you can't spread it, which was the definition we all thought exist around vaccinations. But now they're saying to me, oh, no, I always knew. They never said that it stopped transmission. They said that it stopped symptomatic disease. It's like it's literally you see how the that that mass formation that brainwashing happens by media that they erase your memory of what was said luckily for us And and I'm this is true for me too the cameras have been rolling on me this whole time I have been speaking my mind this whole time You can go back and see everything that I said just as I can go back and see everything that they said So just for all of you I know you have friends out there that have literally changed this tune and you're like mind blown as and they believe it It's like a, it's like a, it's a, it's a group pathological lie that, no, I always knew that it was just 95% effective at reducing symptoms, not at stopping transmission. I have proof that that is not what they sold you on. And here it is.

Everyone who takes the vaccine is not just protecting themselves, but reducing their transmission to other people and allowing society to get back to normal. We can kind of almost see the end. We're vaccinating so very fast. Our data from the CDC today suggest, you know, that vaccinated people do not carry the virus, don't get sick. Getting vaccinated and getting a booster shot when eligible can save your life and protect you and your family and friends from getting seriously ill and spreading infection. What do you think the probability is 80%? Personally, I think it's 100%. I think that there's a reduction in transmission. Essentially, vaccines block you from getting and giving the virus. We have all the vaccines we need.

We just need our people to take it, A, for their own protection, for the protection of their family, but also to break the chain of transmission. You want to be a dead end to the virus. So when the virus gets to you, you stop it. You don't allow it to use you as the stepping stone to the next person. Failure to get vaccinated doesn't just put you at risk. I think this is what is important in a way. If it's not you who suffers, if you don't, simply, it's also other people.

If you've done the right thing and gotten vaccinated, you deserve the freedom to be safe from COVID-19, to have your kids safe from COVID, to get back to the things you love. You're not going to get COVID if you have these vaccinations. If enough people get vaccinated, it actually halts transmission. The people who are not getting vaccines, you don't have to listen to a minority of people who are being harmful to the greater good. and who are not acting on logic, reason, and science. I want everyone to be vaccinated so that they're safe

and so that their families are safe and so that life can feel a little more normal again. Now we know that the vaccines work well enough, that the virus stops with every vaccinated person. A vaccinated person gets exposed to the virus. The virus does not infect them. The virus cannot then use that person to go anywhere else. It cannot use a vaccinated person as a hostess.

to go get more people. That means the vaccines will get us to the end of this. You could not be more graphically or articulately, articulately wrong, right? I mean, when you listen to what they're saying, Tony Fauci telling you it stops with you. This will stop the virus. Rachel Maddow saying we now know that it,

you know, you get vaccinated, you cannot catch this, you cannot give it to anyone else, all of them saying, you're going to protect your family, not just yourself, this is your duty, all of that now, all of that in light of what we have seen, whether it was a changing tide, which it wasn't Peter Hotez, who worked on a COVID vaccine and came out against this one early on saying, I'm worried about antibody dependent enhancement, which is a totally different conversation, all of these people shilling for this product, and dead wrong when they said, we know that it stops transmission because we've now heard from one of the president's advisor yeah we never tested for that right and so the members of

this european parliament committee the EU union they did they took it further so what they actually asked for was we want the documents we want to see how you what was in the contracts that you signed our people onto we want your phone text messages to see who you were talking to when these contracts were happening that's to the EU president ursula van de laen and so this this committee didn't just stop that was icing on the cake when Janie Smalls from Pfizer admitted what she admitted. That was just icing on the cake. So this group took a step further. They formed a small committee. They called a public press conference and they had this to say. This was Francisco Donata. She's an Italian member of the

European Parliament. Listen to this. All right. The conduct of Pfizer Biotech, the biggest pharmaceutical company involved in the COVID-19 vaccine's production is deplorable and unacceptable. in a democratic framework as the European Union one. Yesterday in the official European Parliament Special Committee for COVID pandemic management, the Pfizer CEO Albert Burla refused to appear to answer our legitimate questions about his private text messages with the President of EU Commission Ursula von der Leyen that have already been considered to be irregular according to the transparency, EU regulation by the EU Ombudsman and the EU Court of Auditors.

He has sent Mrs. Small in his place, who has not answered the most important questions that our Special Committee has addressed to her regarding the company's price policy, the release of clinical trials reports, adverse effects and other issues concerning the safety and efficacy of Pfizer-Biontech vaccines. The continuous non-fulfillment of the duties of transparency by Pfizer executives clearly violates the EU citizens' rights to know in detail how and for which purpose the taxpayer's money is spent. We're discussing about billions of public money that has been managed by the EU Commission

by secret agreements directly conducted with the company's CEO, away from democratic control of people by their elected representatives in the EU Parliament. The refusal by President von der Leyen to disclose the content of their text messages first, and the denial by Mr. Burlett to appear in front of the Parliament then, followed by the reticent behaviour of Mrs. Small yesterday, casts concerning shadows on the legitimacy of the entire contract award process, leaving suspicion of corruption. to emerge. I think that companies who behave this way should be banned by the lobbies allowed to enter the Parliament and the Commission, and that further investigation is needed by competent

authorities to let the truth come to light and to secure the full right of the EU citizens to transparency and public-interested-oriented EU policies. Thank you very much. I just want to drive home right now as you're watching this. This is literally happening at the same time. This is just a week ago, nine days ago. This is the statement being made at the European Parliament. This is a person, one of many now, calling for an investigation, saying that Pfizer should not even be allowed to be a part of a lobby allowed into the parliament. That's how strongly she feels about what's happened.

And if Alec Borla feel like he got around, you know, dodging a bullet here by sending. in his underling, it did nothing but light a fuse. This is outrageous. I mean, this is, these are high up individuals, representatives in parliament that are demanding answers. And you and I have a sense of what those answers are, and it does not look good. Right. And she's saying questions like, we, we're looking at corruption, conflicts of interest, we want transparency. You know, you do a little bit of research. You don't have to scratch the surface that far to see things like this. in December of 2020, when the first vaccines were going into the arms of a UK grandmother, we have Ursula von der Leyen's husband, Heiko.

So she's the head, she's the one that signed these contracts. She's basically the president or head of the EU? Head of the European Union. European Union. And they're asking, what did you sign? Like, they're not being allowed as members of that same parliament. They're not being allowed as EU members to see what the heck she signed. What was the agreement, right?

That's what they're asking for. And allegedly there's text messages where she was texting Albert Burla back and forth during that time. What are they talking about? They won't be revealed. Wow. So if you look into a little bit of what was happening at that time as well, her husband, Ursula von der Leyen's husband takes a position as medical director at a medical director at a medical director at medical director at medical director. as medical director at a company called Originesis in New York, of all places. So there is the actual page.

You can see him there. Medical director, Heiko von der Leyen. There he is. And so in April of 2022, this was well known by everybody saying, what's going on here? There's an investigative reporting that looked into this. And this is what they had to say. Let's look at that investigative report to see what they wrote. They wrote this, Albert Ursula, Haiko, the dangerous relationship between the president of the European

Commission and the... CEO of Pfizer, they were on it back in April. They write this, according to them, basically they're saying, Dr. Heiko von der Leyen, husband of the president of the European Commission, who until then had been running a clinic in Hanover. Dell, that's in Germany, was recruited in December 2020 as medical director of the pharmaceutical company Origenesis, which is based in New York State, just like Pfizer. Then I have to assume that there was a pretty decent salary hike. Absolutely, in the tune of over a million I hear. So it goes on to say Origenesis is a

biotech company developing cell and gene therapies using messenger RNA technology. In May 2020, the company announced the launch of its new vaccine platform targeting the COVID virus. When Dr. Van der Leyen joins the Origenesis board, the European Commission had just concluded a series of contracts with pharmaceutical companies between August and November 2020, including two with Pfizer, Bio, and Tech. Wow. So at the same time, Ursula, who's secretly having conversations with Alex Borla, secretly signing documents that the rest that you hasn't seen yet are demanding to see. Her husband gets this giant promotion onto a biotech company making an MRI COVID vaccination. In New York, right down the road. Now, just to be clear, they haven't yet connected that

directly to Pfizer or one of the many companies supposed to deliver vaccines, right? Yeah, correct. Correct. Well, this was, we're looking at this in the spirit of these are questions that need to be answer, along with many other questions that some transparency may help shed some light on. So now we go back to this press conference. It didn't just stop with Francesca. We have another gentleman's name's Christian Teres. He is a Romanian member of the European Parliament, and he has a blistering admonishment. Take a look at this. When we found out that the CEO of Pfizer decided not to come and answer questions, this is not an inquiry committee. So he was not bound by law to come and, you know, he was not on record,

you know, he was not facing any criminal punishments in case he's lying in front of this committee. But even in that case, he refused to come and answer some concrete and specific questions. Questions that I think all of us and all of you have. And the first question is, what exactly in these contracts? What are they hiding exactly? I mean, in the previous, press conferences I showed you some of the pages you know from these contracts this is how they were disclosed to us and to the public and to the press obviously after some of us and some of the brave journalists asked what are the contract signed between the European Commission and these pharmaceutical companies so

this is how they this is how they disclose the contracts over a hundred pages every contract with Pfizer with Moderna tens of pages of those contracts were black out. So yesterday when we asked, I was the one asking, and some of my colleagues asked, when are they going to fully release these contracts? The representative of Pfizer, who was sent to replace the CEO of Pfizer, said that they can't fully disclose this contracts because they have some commercial secrets over there, and they have to protect their interests. Now I'm asking you, what about the interests of our people? What about the interests of the Europeans whose money was spent or wasted, I would say now, to buy these medical products

that are not providing what they were marketed for. Because what we found out yesterday, when one of my colleagues asked if they tested, in this case Pfizer, if Pfizer tested, if their medical product is stopping the spread of the virus, we were shocked to find out yesterday that they haven't tested their vaccine to see if it's stopping the spread of the virus. So we are now more than a year after the green certificate, the digital green certificate was imposed in the European Union

and people were forced to be vaccinated with the medical product in order to exercise their basic fundamental rights and they were told and we were told. We were voted against the green certificate, but many of our colleagues voted in favor of it because they believed what these companies have said that if you get vaccinated, you will not be infected and you will not spread the virus.

They even ran campaign and said, get vaccinated in order to keep your grandmother and your parents healthy. And we find out now, after more than a year, that when they requested the special marketing authorization, they haven't tested the vaccine to see if it's stopping the spread of the virus. So I'm asking again, and we are asking again, why are they going to hide? What do they hide exactly?

Why aren't they transparent with their medical product? We heard yesterday, I mean, I was shot. because Pfizer uses opportunity just to do a PR campaign and even lecture asks why are we asking this and not asking that? Who are they to question us? What kind of questions do we ask? We are elected by the people for the people, not they. And they are supposed to answer all these questions, which they had not.

Folks, I just want to say, I know that as we're sitting here today, it's a dark day in the United States of America, our own CDC is turned on the people against our will. Obviously, by the low vaccination rate of our children, it shows where this country is at with their faith in this vaccine. The CDC doesn't care, now mandated upon us. But this right here, what we're watching right now is the beginning of the end for this vaccine program right now,

and especially this Pfizer vaccine. I mean, Jeffrey, these are dogs with a bone now. I mean, they are asking all the right questions, and they're pissed off. And rightfully so. Where is our money gone? What did we pay for? Why did we all have to be the face on television of this program that took civil liberties away?

Lock people away, destroy their jobs, all telling them, we're doing this to you because this product is going to stop transmission. And now he's saying we now know that you always knew that it didn't and couldn't? Yeah. It didn't breakaway speedsdell. And it's a social movement. It's obviously becoming a political movement now to have these questions being answered. But it couldn't come at a worse time in Europe. all across Europe right now, inflation is hitting. People are having to decide whether to pay money to heat themselves or pay money to feed themselves. And so that's rightfully so asking, their representatives are asking, where did our money go? We have $71 billion that we just threw into a vaccine that's not stopping transmission. Butell, what if the vaccine didn't just fail to stop transmission? What if it increased all-cause mortality? Now we're getting into the territory of the Highwire's investigations over the past year.

Take a look at literally one of the most historic moments we're probably seeing out of Europe when it comes to this conversation. Look at this. All right. There's another issue right now raised all across Europe. The excess mortality rate in the month of July 20th, according to Eurostat, in the month of July, the extent of the amount of July, the excess mortality rate all across European Union went up 16% more. than the average of 2016 and 2019. Now if you look on the map here, this is released by the Eurostan, it's not from us.

If you look on this map, you will see that the countries with the highest vaccination rate have right now the highest mortality rate. So obviously we ask, is there a connection between being vaccinated and having a higher mortality rate? Everybody's avoiding. answering this, I would say, logical question. Wow.

I mean, all I can say is wow. Obviously, we have been sharing your Euromo data, your stat data all the way along, showing things like this, but that just seeing him hold that, we haven't looked in a while. That's horrifying. I mean, I'm seeing a lot of red in there.

What is he pointing to? Yeah, well, let's bring that map up, and let's take a look at that together here. So, as he said, rightfully so, the places in the year, European Union there with the highest vaccination rates are also showing the highest excess mortality. And that's July 2020. So you see Portugal, you see Italy, you see France, Germany, Ireland's up there, even Spain. And, you know, those are some of the countries that had the most restrictive authoritarian

lockdowns and measures in place to get people vaccinated. So this is a conversation that we're really talking about here. And it's, I mean, almost nobody, take it just take it back for a second. We'll look at that in a second. We'll look at this middle. The excess mortality hits. plus 16% highest 2022 values so far. But let's go back to this map. Because folks, if you look at that little, you know, anti-decoder ring there on the side, that deep, dark red, which looks like these countries are bleeding,

that's where you're at a plus 15, above 15% excess mortality. But the orange, that's 10 to 15. The gold, you know, 8 to 10, really, you know, So if you think that light yellow is like zero, they're in trouble. Yeah. And this is, and as you're pointing out, the countries like Portugal that were in, the headlines bragging with the highest vaccine rigs, blood red bleeding in those countries. Right, right.

And we saw this from the studies. We saw this from the scientific papers being written. We saw this from the Office of National Statistics until they stopped publishing their data in the UK. This was something that you called out in March of this year. knew that all-cause mortality would be the conversation. Let's take a look back at that moment. All right. People say, Dell, they're going to try and hide it. Hide what? You might be able to hide COVID deaths. You might be able to sort of manipulate the COVID deaths and take people that are

having heart attacks and put them in the COVID category. You might be able to hide the actual, you know, COVID vaccine rates and who was truly vaccinated. Were they fully vaccinated? Were they boosted? Did they only have one shot? Was there only 14 days after the second shot? They're manipulating all of that. But one thing you cannot manipulate. is the all-cause mortality, just meaning if there's a rise in just death across the board in every nation, that is going to be really hard to hide. I mean, this is sort of the beginning of the I Told You So's, but it was so clear. We were watching. We've watched manipulation of the data.

They have been doing things like saying, well, if you got one vaccine, you're still unvaccinated. If you got two vaccines, you're considered unvaccinated until 14 days after the second shot. how many people did that vaccine injure that that went on to a death in the unvaccinated column. I mean, all of this, these manipulations, all the people that were testing positive with COVID in hospitals was listed as a COVID death when really they died in a car accident. I mean, all of these things were manipulations. But what we knew is, and I said it right there, and now we're seeing it on the stage in the European Union.

What you cannot argue with is why the hell when this vaccine was supposed to have drop death rates in the middle of whatever a pandemic, we are still seeing a rise in death rates. A rise when this virus is at the weakest point it's ever been in. Why are our death rates exceeding 16% higher than they were before COVID? What is it? What are we dying from? And as you said, insurance actuaries showing us, and it isn't the elderly, 18 to 64, 40% rise in payouts to death by insurance companies. group, this is going to be the story of our time. And I'm amazed. Every time I think about the CDC

signing the names on, these people are signing their names to a document that will live in infamy as I started to show out with in the face of a growing death rate that really appears to only have one source as we know it, the only change in humanity that everyone was involved in that could explain and across the board excess death rate appears to be this vaccine. And yet that's not stopping the CDC. Right, right. And, you know, the final conversation here is brought to you by Mislav Kolakusik. He is a Croatian lawyer, another member of the European Parliament. And I say a Croatian lawyer because the way he attacks this, he hits Pfizer in the place that's going to make them pay attention, which is their pocketbook. Take a look at what he had to say. All right. Stotin million of the world, in the last two days,

he, puttem of the social mediaeuvre, Director of Pfizer, on the question, Roba Rosa, is it provident tester of ceptia on spritiavanes pre-enosa virus? Dobio he,

isravan, the answeran, not. So, so, not not not

non- non- without with that other of the and the

English NHS who is who who and umrally and umrly

from the third-stit-stot-stot- -doze and necceptial, and necceplgiening, Nedvojewbeno that no there's a in a raza

in the and umirangue of COVID-19 from the so-z-cyeplied-in-clipped and neceplied-gian. Slidom to it,

noxinu-you-gover on-nabcannic doze because they're them prodal lajna cyevah. To, to-sad-up-srechained of the United States, in the

amount of $2.5 million, and the current-cannibal prognon against Pfizer and other, and, we're not, and we're doing in the presention of the cashen of

the bailing of lawgner of the United, and in inistening pro-raçun of 70-1 million euros. If, and for

how much, Ursula Folden Lyon Follernard Lyon was about all of us to pay to pharmacoteam. My question

is, when you're raskin'all. Thank you. It's amazing how he describes it as we must not participate any longer

in this crime of promoting fake vaccines. Right, right. I mean, that sentence, the crime of promoting fake vaccines and a stop

to any future payments he wants reimbursement for the 2.5 billion that's already gone out criminal charges you know this is these are fighting words yeah and what he's talking about here the European Union is made up with 27 member states the European Union is its own entity it's a political economic entity if you will Federation so they they fronted 2.5 billion euros to up you up front to get this ball rolling but they committed to future contracts this is what Ursula committed to 71 billion euros for all vaccinations, not just Pfizer's.

So what Colacusic is saying here is we want our upfront money back of 2.5 billion euros. We're canceling the contracts of all 71 billion, and we're charging you, we may charge you with crimes of damaging our budget and selling fake medicines. It's a big, it's a really big story there. And what's interesting when you look into that, that 71 billion is supposed to provide 4.6 billion doses. There's only about 400, 47 million people in the European Union. So you do a quick math equation. That's about 10 shots per person is what they committed to. So it's almost as if they weren't just investing in a COVID vaccine. They're investing in MRI technologies for future vaccines, which is what we've been

warning everybody. This is the beginning. They have a vaccine they can make overnight. They can start charging you for the millions of viruses and bacteria that are coursing through your veins right now that have never affected you, but they think are dangerous and start mandating those too. without any need to show that they stop transmission. I mean, in that light, it appears it's a transfer of wealth to build out this MRNA infrastructure to bring on the next phase here. Well, I'll tell you, as I said, in this dark day in America,

I feel a lot of light coming from this. I don't see how this goes away. I mean, as he points out, and as many of these, you know, have stated to the millions that have watched this statement by the Pfizer executive on so, social media, we're standing for you, to all of those we've been forced to lie to, these people aren't walking away. I mean, I don't know, maybe you can disappear one politician that maybe he's speaking out

of line. You have a whole panel of them now and how many around them are starting to reel. It's really outrageous. So let's shift gears a little bit here. Because I've been saying this is all about really in some ways, and I told you so from the high wire, there's many degrees and levels to this, but I want to be really clear. because we hear Pierce Morgan saying, oh, the science changed.

We know that that isn't what happened. There never was the science there to change. We discover that from this Pfizer executive. But ultimately, they're saying, you know, there's this idea that it's brand new. 10 days ago, the European Union just discovered that the vaccine doesn't, you know, was never tested to stop transmission

as though it's the first time it's ever been heard. And I'm glad they're waking up to it. I really am. But anyone watching the high wire would have known you knew this way back. We're not talking a year ago. We didn't miss this a year ago. You brought this to our attention before there is even an emergency use authorization.

Before anyone had gotten this shot outside of the trials, I believe the date's November 5th, 2020, November 5th, you made the statement on the highway right here that it did not appear this vaccine was going to stop transmission. This is a, I think, a profound moment. It's in a moment I'm very proud of now. It's proud of it then, but, you know, we didn't, you know, were we going to be right? It was a strong statement. Here's what you said. The only reason we're even having these conversations about therapeutics is because these are placeholders until we get the vaccine.

So the vaccine is supposed to stop the transmission. The vaccine is supposed to interrupt this thing, get us back to our normal lives. But that's not even going to happen now. Because what we're seeing out of the BMJ, this is an article out of the BMJ, this is an article of the BMJ saying, will COVID-19 save lives? That's the question asked by Peter Doshi. Current trials aren't designed to tell us. So amazing work here by Peter Doshi, I have to say. So he writes in the article, none of the trials currently underway are designed to detect a reduction in any serious outcomes such as hospital admissions, use of intensive care, or deaths,

nor are the vaccines being studied to determine whether they can interrupt transmission of the virus. He goes on to say, but that's not right. In all the ongoing phase three trials for which details have been released, laboratory confirmed infections, even with only mild symptoms qualify as meeting the primary endpoint definition. So, for instance, in Pfizer-Modernus trials, basically a cough and a positive PCR test is enough to bring the trial towards completion, not stopping transmission, not keeping people from dying, not keeping people out of intensive care, just mild symptoms. That's, it's unbelievable to think that's November that's about a month before this vaccine even gets approval to be injected into people

based on emergency use authorization. The EU is saying there's shock to find that the trials didn't test for transmission but anyone watching the high wire knew on November 5th, 2020 that they had not tested because Peter Doshi at BMJ had pointed that out. Now remind me because now looking back at that he talked about how they changed, there's a whole discussion on changing the endpoints. This vaccine was saying was going to reduce hospitalization, reduced death, but it didn't even, they didn't even attempt to show that in the trial. They didn't attempt to show that it stopped transmission. They didn't attempt to show death because honestly, I think, and people need to wrap their head around this. We're told this was

a study of 40,000 people, that in watching 40,000 people, half of whom got the vaccine, half of whom did not, that we saw that there was less people going to the hospital in the vaccinated group than the unvaccinated group, but that was never. what they sought to prove in fact they lowered it to what was it a a cough essentially something as low as a cough yeah a cough in a positive PCR test a mild symptom and a positive PCR test but what they weren't doing as well in order to see if this stops transmission you need to do continual PCR tests over a very long timeline you know up to sometimes twice a week with those symptoms they

weren't testing the asymptomatic there is no words about that in there so those people were just lost in the study but Peter Doshi goes all hold on a second let me just make sure because I this is going to be mind-blowing to a lot of brand new people out there. They didn't. Now, I could have set my elementary school child to the task of how are we going to see if this vaccine works, and there's a chance that they would have come up with the idea, well, why don't we just have the group that got the vaccine, those that didn't? And if the vaccine is going to stop transmission, like how would you see it? I know how you see it. Just give everybody a PCR test, the same test,

whatever test you're using, give everybody that test once a week and let's just see how many people get infected. Because remember, we aren't locked down because of hospitalizations. We're locked down because of asymptomatic carriers, right? It was the idea that what was dangerous was the amount of people that were catching this and didn't know what were spreading it. So the vaccine doesn't stop that. What good is it? We can't get out of lockdown because I'm wearing a mask even though I feel perfectly healthy because you're telling me there's a potential. I could still be sick. So they're not testing for that in this trial? They're not testing. It's not testing. It's a lot. see if they can remove the asymptomatic.

I mean, it is absolutely astounding. They're not testing to see whether or not I'm going to the hospital. They're just testing. So let me get this straight about, and this happened all like two or three weeks after the second shot was when the big 95% came. They essentially just said, we tracked people in the first, what was it, 170 people or so that got vaccinated, that, the first 150 people, 160 people, 70, whatever was that got a cough. We're going to then go to them, give them a PCR test

and see where they vaccinated or unvaccinated. And that's where we got the 95%. It was like nine in the vaccinated group had this cough and a PCR test. And 160 or 70 in the unvaccinated had a cough and a PCR test. But I remember there was more to this story. A few weeks later, Peter Doshi got back on this.

And he said, wait a minute. There was more than 160 symptomatic people. Yet that's all we heard about. Tell me, remind me what that was about. So as you're saying, as Pfizer is moving at the speed of science here, we have Peter Doshi who comes out just less than a month later after this article and it says, look, in the fine print here, I'm seeing something. I'm seeing that there's over 3,000 people that you kind of just discarded and focused on this 170. So this is what he had to say. He wrote this article.

It's titled, Pfizer and Modernas 95% effective vaccines. We need more details and the raw data. So we're still not seeing the raw data. So this is what he says here. He says, quote, all attention has focused on the dramatic efficacy results. Pfizer reported 170 PCR-confirmed COVID-19 cases split 8 to 162, there you go, between vaccine and placebo groups. But these numbers were dwarfed by a category of disease called suspected COVID-19. Those with symptomatic COVID-19 that were not PCR confirmed.

According to the FDA's report on Pfizer's vaccine, there were 3,400, and 10 total cases of suspected. but unconfirmed COVID-19 in the overall study population. 1,594 occurred in the vaccine group versus 1,816 in the placebo group. I mean, that would have changed. That's like a 50-50 split. I mean, you almost would say. And so now, I mean, so literally, we were told this was about this 170 people, but right in the waiting room next door, you have 3,000 sick people,

and you refuse to test them and tell us, we figured out. everything we need here. By the way, everyone that's watching right now, Aaron Siri sued for these Pfizer data and we are still waiting to get this tranche. They wanted to hold back for 75 years. The FDA, not Pfizer, the FDA, try to hold this data from us for 75 years. Dr. Peter McCullough, Robert Malone, many scientists all came together to be the front for this request. And Aaron Siri, who is the basis of all our legal cases has won, we are looking to see what are we going to learn from that data. We need to know what was going on with those 3,000 people

and how did you cherry pick? I mean, you want to talk about cherry picking. Why did you cherry pick the 170 that you did and leave 3,000 cases? You couldn't afford it. Could you not afford PCR tests? When Joe Biden's saying, I'm giving $10 billion of taxpayer money to get this vaccine rolling,

nobody could put any money to PCR testing, not even the 40,000, which I think we would all think was happening. You didn't even PCR test everyone that was symptomatic. What a disaster. And I think that this broad, I mean, again, CDC, where are they going to be at when this comes breaking out? And we really realize why this type of cover-up was taking place. Right. And to bring the viewers here, so here we are, you and I and our team, we're sitting here in December, in November and saying, oh my God, looking into these trials, this thing's not even tested to stop transmission. So we start thinking, how are they going to sell this? How are they going to sell it and tell us it stops

transmission? And you were on that on December 3rd, 2020. Take a look at what you had to say then. Just to remind people. I want to explain something that I was even somewhat confused about it. First of all, have you been asking yourself, why is it sometimes they say COVID-19 and other times they say SARS-CoV-2? Well, there's actually, here's the difference. SARS-CoV-2 is the infection that we spread to each other, that we're asymptomatic carriers or whatever's going on, we sneeze, we spread to each other SARS-CoV-2. COVID-19 is just the symptoms that come from SARS-CoV-2, otherwise known as the disease, right? The part that makes you ill at ease.

This is really important for me to explain what's going on here. So when you were watching that news, and they do this on purpose, you were under the impression when they say 95% effective at stopping COVID-19, you think, well, that's it. We can reach herd immunity because it stops the infection. And I can't spread it to anybody else. And you keep hearing all the scientists and pundits saying, we've got to get as many people to get this vaccine as fast as we can in order to achieve herd immunity and stop the infection around the world.

But here's the problem. They are not telling you that it stops the infection. It is stopping the illness. or the symptoms known as COVID-19. You are still, as far as they know, infected with SARS-CoV-2. You can still spread SARS-CoV-2 to anybody you meet on the street. Thereby, when they're rushing you to get a vaccine to begin with, saying, we can reach herd immunity.

There is nothing in science that proves that that's true. In fact, they are only going to turn you into an asymptomatic carrier. It's outrageous that we're in this. that we're in this moment where as I said we get to roll our cameras and Fauci can go back to his we were all on tape for what we said and in the middle of this we were the ones losing our YouTube channel using our Facebook channel being banned along with dr. Robert Malone and Peter McCullough the scientists that knew that this was all a lie and and not only were we doubling

down and knowing that it wasn't going to stop transmission we were showing you how they were using a word salad to confuse everybody saying SARS, COVID-2 and COVID-19 as though it was interchangeable, but basically admitting in some ways that it wasn't going to stop transmission. It was really outrageous. And to think now how affirmative we were, that's what that's a December 3rd. I'm saying that still no one in America outside of the trials has received this vaccine. Can you imagine had we had the prime time spot that is owned by pharma, whether it's CNN or Fox or

MSNBC, nobody. I challenge everyone out there. You show me the news station that is affirmatively said to you, this vaccine will not stop transmission. The studies showed it wouldn't stop transmission. And here's how they're going to voice this lie upon you with a word salad between SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19. Nobody else had that. We were there. We were being honest.

We were doubling and tripling down. But I think, and this is the greatest I told you so, because in a way, it goes against what we're hearing out of the European Union. And what they keep saying, first of all, that we just discovered, we've showed you that we didn't just discovered it. Maybe they just discovered it. But no one on the highway that was watching all the way back before this vaccine was even released, they didn't just discover it. They've known for, you know, two years now. But here's the point. They keep saying Pfizer lied to us. Pfizer lied to us. And, you know, it's true. Pfizer's a part of this lie. But that has never been the problem in my mind. It's never been. I have said from the beginning that why I do what I do. do as a journalist says, I just have this instinct, if you will, or maybe a pessimism that when there's billions of dollars to be made, I don't tend to trust the industry that's making the product telling me it's safe.

I think they're going to lie. I think BP by nature tries to hide the oil when they spill it. They don't alarm everybody and say, come out and help me clean it up. That's just not how we work. We're always like a bunch of little kids with a kid in the hand in the cooking jar. You know, it wasn't me. Can't prove anything. I wasn't there.

You know, Bart Simpsoning our way out of it. That's what industries do. but regulatory agencies. That is what they're there for. The FDA, the CDC, Health and Human Services, the NHS, they are there to make sure

that these lying industries that are trying to make billions of dollars and slide anything under the carpet they can, that they are being held accountable. And in this case, what we proved long ago was that it wasn't just Pfizer that was lying to you.

It was the FDA. It was literally the leading health authority in the world on this subject during the emergency use authorization that was written by the FDA in ink you told us back on December 17th just days now after the very first vaccine i think is going out no no actually i think this is a day before the EUA we had just been released what they were going to talk about in the EUA you show the FDA in their own document admits we don't have proof it stops transmission Folks, this is it. This is the I told you so of all time. Don't let anyone tell you the science change on this. Don't let anyone tell you was just Pfizer lying to you. This is the FDA, purposely lying to the world when they allowed anyone on the news to say it's going to stop transmission and protect grandma.

They always knew it wasn't. And here's Jeffrey Jackson delivering that proof. We did check the source. We did take the primary source, which was Pfizer's experimental vaccine data that was submitted to the FDA for their emergency. use authorization. And what did it say under Section 8.4 unknown risks, data safety gaps in certain subpopulations. There are currently insufficient data to make conclusions about the safety of the vaccine and subpopulations, such as children less than 16 years of age, pregnant and lactating individuals and immunocompromised individuals. Vaccine effectiveness against transmission of SARS COVID-2. I thought we're talking about end of the pandemic with this. Data are limited to assess the effect of the vaccine against transmission of service COVID-2 from individuals who are infected despite

vaccination. We don't have the data. They said it right there. They're limited. We didn't do a trial. We didn't look at it. It's supposed to be a big shocking discovery. I'm glad it's lit this fire in Europe a few days ago, but the truth was that fire should have been lit and could have been lit had we not been censored. For those that were telling the truth, had we not been censored, Can you imagine where we'd be in this world right now? Yeah, and as you noticed, that was from the FDA's own website. That was a link from the FDA's own website.

That was what our regulatory agency, which in a perfect world were funding to protect us from predatory industries, from industries that have been caught lying like Pfizer to the tune of billions of dollars in criminal fines in the past. This is the stopgap measure that we're supposed to give our power away to and say, you do the vetting. And they took that document, they put it on their website, they're saying, this is the information we're discussing, Trust us, we'll protect you. EUA, off to the races in 2020. And we were there, and we were censored. We were there.

It's incredible. And, you know, for anyone, and by the way, I know we're nailing this to the wall. We're doing that on purpose. This is that time capsule. I want you to share with all of your friends. We're being reasonable. This is the science. This is what the high wire has done the whole time, which is present you with the science.

But let's step outside the science just for a second. For any one of your friends out there that may be saying, well, I mean, yeah, maybe FDA was writing it, But that doesn't necessarily mean, you know, that the officials knew that, which I don't know why you would give them a pass. I don't know why you would accept that your own officials can't read the documents that a couple of journalists are reading when they're supposed to be leading us towards scientific integrity and through scientific integrity, why they wouldn't know. But here's proof they did know. In fact, they're bragging about it. This is what Deborah Burke said just recently about her knowledge about that transmission. and whether this vaccine was going to stop transmission,

you can't get away from this, folks. This is the court of public opinion. This is the high wire court right now. Watch this. I knew these vaccines were not going to protect against infection, and I think we overplayed the vaccines, and it made people then worry that it's not going to protect against severe disease and hospitalization.

It will, but let's be very clear. 50% of the people who died from the Amacron surge were older, vaccinated. What's going to? I think we can rest our case right there, a case that we've been making for two years. Everyone out there that's been watching the highway, that's been supporting the high wire and sharing the great work that you've been doing, our international investigative team that has made a lot of this possible, some of the things we wouldn't have found without people

inside of Europe giving us that European data and all of it is real, all of it we've been sharing to come to this point. So let's just wrap this up, Jeffrey. I think what's, what's somewhat depressing for me at the moment. And I think for people, there's a pride in America that we're the beacon of light and hope and freedom, transparency for the people, by the people. It is so clear right now as of today that we at least have a government that doesn't believe that it's for the people. They're not listening to our desires or needs. No one is asking for them to mandate this COVID vaccine on the childhood schedule when it's clearly under a massive investigation as it should. should be in Europe. And I find myself just, again, I was asking, and we're sitting there sitting, why isn't America? Why aren't our politicians having this exact investigation that's going on in Europe?

I mean, it's inevitable. But why are we going to be the last to the table instead of the first, as we've always been leaders? And as we were talking, we all remembered what Senator Ron Johnson had said when I interviewed him over a month ago. And also, I think when we look at right now, We're in election season. This is a third rail for a lot of people, not Ron Johnson necessarily,

but this is what he had to say is why aren't, you know, are we going to see our, you know, politicians investigating this vaccine? This is what they had to say. People are opening up their eyes. Yeah. But, I mean, the powers to be, they're certainly not admitting it. I was just going to sat at lunch and they were, you know, saying the praise about the vaccines again, saying it saved 20 million lives.

There's a study out there that the vaccine saved 20 million lives. How convenient. I love to see that study. So, no, they will continue. People voted for this stuff. We spent billions on it. They were recommending it, whether it's doctors, whether it's members of Congress.

They don't want to admit to something they recommended their constituents or their patients might harm them or kill them. So the state of denial is going to be almost impossible to break. Okay, if you've been involved in this, and if you've been pushing this, you are not going to want to see evidence, you're not going to want to admit it. It's really unfortunate that this is how government works, right?

It's all just about getting reelected. Everyone, and we know it. Everyone we've said is going to try and shuffle this under the rug. That's why I brought up all-cause mortality, staring us right in the face now across the world. We have, it's important right now. I still believe in our right to vote. I still believe, I know there's questions about voting systems.

we cannot let that stop us right now. I think everybody that's going to be voting, and I'm not going to tell anyone who to vote for. What I will say is you better be voting for someone that is asking the right questions when it comes to this. You better be voting for people like we're seeing in the European Union right now asking the right questions. Why was this lie forced upon us?

Who signed on to this lie? Who knew what? Deborah Birx is saying, I knew it wasn't going to stop transmission, but you wouldn't have been able to force this through mandate if you had let Biden, President, I don't think, let him know, did he know that it didn't stop transmission? He sure seemed like somebody was telling him that's what it was doing. We need an investigation, and I think we are the best equipped to really do an investigation.

We saw some glimmer of this. And when we think about, you know, I think about Elon Musk, you know, hopefully Twitter ends up opening up and not censoring voices. There may be a shift. There is some light at the end of the tunnel. but I think Jim Jordan, in one of these hearings, talking to Deborah Birx, asked the right kind of questions, who really was spreading the misinformation? Because that's what this is all about. Was it Pfizer?

Was it the high wire? Was it the FDA? Was it Deborah Birx? Here's what Jim Jordan comes to in his conclusion. You're an expert. You were on the task board. You were part of this effort when you were in the previous administration, and you're saying in this administration that you can't rule out the fact that our government was lying to,

us when they told us the vaccinated could not get the virus? I don't know about their discussions that they had in the task force. So I can't tell you that. I can tell you as a family member who had individuals that were susceptible, of course we got everybody vaccinated. But we still use layered protection during surges because I knew potentially the vaccine immunity would wane like natural immunity waned. And there was evidence that every four months reinfection was occurring in South Africa.

Wow. when the government told us that the vaccinated couldn't transmit it, was that a lie or was that a guess? Or is it the same answer? I think it was hope that the vaccine would work in that way. And that's why I think scientists and public health leaders always have to be at the table, being very clear what we know and what we don't know. This is important for the country to know.

So when I asked the question, when the government told us that the vaccinated couldn't get it, and I ask you if it was a guess or a lie, you said you don't know, you said you think it was hope. So what we do know is it wasn't the truth. So they were either guessing, lying, or hoping, and communicating that information to the citizens of this country. I think they were hoping, but you should know in those original phase three trials

that were done in this country, that we only measured for symptomatic disease. So we weren't proactively testing everybody in those trials to see if they got infected with mild or AIDS. asymptomatic disease and so people had to present within the clinical trial. I just I never had the data that it was going to protect against asymptomatic infection. I'm just struck with the irony. We got we got government agencies guessing, hoping, or lying with with the information they're presenting to the American people and this is the same

this is the same administration that wants to set up the the disinformation governance governance board and wants to talk about misinformation and they're the biggest purveyors of misinformation, false information, hopeful information, but not accurate and true information, which is, again, the frustration I think so many of the folks I get the privilege of representing have shared with me. Well, look, I hope that people, as they go out to vote here in the United States of America, think about this conversation. Did the politicians you supported in your state support lockdowns? Did they push this vaccine agenda telling you would stop transmission?

Did they support stopping free speech and supporting censoring and basically book burning? Because that's what has taken place. We are in a very, very scary time right now when it comes to freedom of speech, especially when it is clear the ones being censored were the ones that got this right. Right. And as you said, there is hope. There is hope in Europe, in the European Union. There is hope in this country.

We're afforded tools, avenues of influence that are Jim Jordan. that are Ron Johnson. These are people we elect, and there's avenues of influence in the legal system. Aaron Siri has shown us that, and ICANN has shown us that. We have avenues of influence everywhere. Are there battles for the livers of power in these avenues?

Absolutely, and there always has been. This is the animating contest of liberty that we talk about. Amen. And so what we're trying to do here, it seems like we have momentum right now. When I say we, this is people that want individual liberty, the individual sovereignty, the right to decide what they put into their children's bodies and their bodies. There's a momentum right now. It's hitting Europe, it's hitting the United States.

And this can influence those power centers. And they are power centers. The media are power centers. People are listening to us instead of tuning into Pierce Morgan or Rachel Maddow. Choose your tools wisely, because this is what is going to decide our future. Yeah, and let's be clear. I've tweeted out yesterday that, and I said it looks like the CDC is going to vote for adding the COVID vaccine to the schedule. And I said, Mark, my words, this will go down in history as the moment the majority of Americans turned against the CDC. I do believe they just turned us into the majority. Whether there was any question now, there's no question. When we look at the amount of people that had vaccinated their children, especially with boosters that, there is no confidence

in this product. Therefore, there's waning confidence in the CDC. And now you just brought all the parents that maybe we're on the fence, not wanting to be called an anti-vaxer, guess what? We have just grown. We are now the majority. I am sure of it in this country. It is going to get really easy to start getting the type of support needed because we're all, and it's unfortunate that it takes this level of oppression and bad policy and arrogance to wake people up. But I think this is going to be a part of, again, we've been saying this pandemic has been a great awakening. I just want to just finish up because when I hear Deborah Brooks, who clearly, she says it just as clearly as the Pfizer representative, so I don't know. I've heard, you know, some rumors that Borla might be saying, oh, my, my, the person I sent got it wrong.

No, Deborah Berks clearly said to Jim Jordan, we never in a phase three trial, she looks right to the camera, looks right to you and says in the phase three trials, we didn't test whether or not you were testing positive. symptomatic. We only looked at symptomatic disease, which is what we said. We only look for people who were coughing, forget about the 3,000 that they didn't look at. We don't know why we're going to have to find out about that. But why? Why didn't you look at? Why weren't you testing everybody to see? I mean, that's the entire definition as we knew it of a vaccine, was stopping myself from getting it as they all said they were doing and bragged about, which they didn't achieve. So I couldn't give it to you. Why didn't they? Could they not afford it? Because I remember Joe Biden, you know, saying I've got $10 billion to spend on, on, you know,

promoting this vaccine. Well, forget the promotion for a second. How about the R&D? How about the safety trial? Yeah. How many billions did you have going there? Because they're telling us now what? They couldn't afford some PCR tests in the middle of their trust.

Come on. Exactly. Where did their money go? Yeah. So putting this in perspective, as people are waking up, you know, family members really waking up this, it's important to be gentle to them because they. we're hit with one of the biggest propaganda campaigns in the history of the United States. And that was at the tune of $10 million.

$10 billion. I'm sorry. Thank you. $10 billion. Sometimes I want to minimize it. So this is it right here in CBS News. Biden administration commits $10 billion to fight COVID vaccine inequities. Well, that sounds pretty reasonable.

But just days later, you go to HHS's website and they have this banner waiting for you to look at. The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services launches a nationwide network of trusted voices to encourage vaccination in next phase of COVID-19 public education campaigns. So now you have this apparatus that is being built on the idea that stops transmission. 10 billion dollar apparatus. Can't put any money into proving that it does or making a product that actually does that. But boy, we're going to spend money telling you that it does. Right. Off to the races.

So we have Judicial Watch. This was an organization that now has gotten their hands on internal documents from this trusted messenger vaccination program. Let's just see how they talked about it in there. Let's see what they were speaking about. What type of influence were they looking at with this money? So here are the documents, but we can go into it. So digital media request that.

So this is Joe Biden's like wish list that he's going to spend money on. Is that what we're like a little internal like scratch it on some toilet paper? Here's what we should do. Yes. Yes. This is within HHS and this is where they're going to go with it. Hey, here's an idea. Let's request that Tom Brady create a video with his parents encouraging vaccination.

His parents had COVID last year and he has talked. about their tough recovery. Create custom partnerships with social media platforms with algorithms to hit this audience. Remember we're getting kicked off social media because of the algorithms they're saying create better ones to promote the vaccine. Completely opposite of what's going on. Launch Hollywood comedy writers video content kind of creepy is seeping in there. It goes further. We request a vaccination special on Christian broadcast network featuring evangelical leaders. They're really interested in the religious communities you can see in

here. Yeah. Request that major live TV entertainment shows feature hosts being vaccinated on air, the host of the voice. And people, as you're hearing this, remember what you saw over the last couple of years. This is the script for what it was. Requests that the TV morning and daytime talk shows feature special vaccination reunion moments with everyday Americans talking about what this means to them. Example, hugging grandma for the first time, even though you're not stopping the transmissions, you're probably giving grandma COVID, convene an editorial meeting with the publishers of Catholic

newspapers and newsletters, across. across the country, American Magazine, Florida Catholic, the Catholic Spirit, the tablet. Here's one of the creepier ones, Del. Place a trusted messenger from the government on the Joe Rogan show and Barstool Sports to promote vaccination. Work with an outside expert to identify who will be most effective.

I think about like Peter Hotez, you know, appearing on Joe Rogan and Sanjay Gupta. I wonder if Joe realizes he was just a part of a whole, you know, propaganda campaign. And by the way, I think, Joe in many ways did actually handle some of those conversations very well and who cares if he knows what was behind it. But boy, it's really disgusting. Right. It's really disgusting in the face of what we are now seeing today, what we now know all around the world, what is

coming to light. You spent more money pushing this product than you did making sure you had a product. Right. And were they transparent? Did they come to Joe? Did they come to the people from the voice and say, we have money, we're the government. We want to. influences. There's actually a further, there's one final document from Judicial Watch that will look at here to just go through this blueprint. Work with NFL, remember the NFL. Oh my God. NASCAR, MLB, CMA to request they create content with their talent and release. So your talent is now beholden to government propaganda. Think about the athletes that stood out against this vaccine. Aaron Rogers. You know what I mean? Like these guys. Yeah, Kyrie Irving,

you know, people that we've talked to on this show. I mean, so not only were they influencers with these, you know, these programs, those that went against it were like outed and shamed. Yeah. And what we're looking at is they stood up against $10 billion of U.S. government money and their own league. You got this last one, worked with a Hollywood guild to work vaccination messaging into scripted reality TV shows. Folks, if you didn't think this was happening, if you thought, well, I'm not watching the news, I'm just watching my sitcom, they were brainwashing people there too. Exactly. It's just incredible. It's an interesting time.

And that used to be called subliminal messaging or even product placement. But when the government funds it from a budget like that, you've got to really watch out. That's really incredible. Jeffrey, your reporting has been incredible and impeccable from the beginning. I'm so proud to have worked with you through this entire time. This isn't a day. We're not gloating today. It's actually really quite unfortunate that we were the lone voice for a long time.

And luckily, some other networks have started picking up the story. about a year ago, but two years ago, we were right. We've proven to be right the whole time. Part of that is because I have such faith in you and the work you're doing. A shout out to our team of international scientists and doctors that also help us through this process. Our legal team, Aaron, Siri. But when you look at that propaganda piece that we just saw that's just been brought in through FOIA requests from Jewish Watch, just know that it was that level of propaganda that took place.

and for every one of you out there, that didn't end up getting the COVID vaccine, what you were reading there is the most highest funded propaganda machine that it was ever built. It was 24 hours a day on your news, on your sitcoms, in your movies, in your NFL teams, in your sports, everywhere you turned, our government here in America, and I think very similarly, governments around the world funded all the places your eyeballs would land to me. make you feel horrible if you didn't go along with it and deserve to be a second-class citizen, emboldened those who took this experimental product to hate those that didn't. All of that, and yet here in America, somewhere around 30% of you, I'm sure most who watched

this show, did not get this vaccine. That is an amazing testament to, and you are, you defy what they knew about psychology. You defy what they thought would happen. And it truly is astounding that we stand. And for all of you that are new to this, I don't blame you for having followed CNN and MSNBC and Rachel Maddo and Sanjay Gupta, I used to believe those people were telling me the truth. We all have the moment where something happens where that glitch goes and we go, whoa, whoa, hold on a second. For you, it's happening now.

So welcome to the high wire where we seek to be able to look back at the third. things we've said and be proud of it as we are today. And as we look forward, we guarantee you that we will be bringing you the evidence. And for those of you that don't know that we have this tool, we call it the High Wire Protocol. Every single week after the show, this Thursday, today, on Monday, if you've signed up to our newsletter, we will send you all of the evidence, all the slides, all of the things that we referenced so that you have it in your hand, so that you can actually show your friends and your family the actual evidence. All you have to do is give us your email right there to sign up the newsletter we won't share it with anybody

everything we're doing is encrypted because we obviously know that there's people trying to get through to our information so you're protected but take use of this tool I don't want you to run out there and say hey Dell Bigtree said or Jeffrey Jackson said on the show the Highwire I want to be able to put that evidence your hands for everyone watching the Highwire back on November 5th 2020 in December 3rd and December 17th you were all holding the emergency use authorization that showed you, the FDA admitted they never tested for transmission. It had no idea if the vaccine would stop transmission. I'm glad it's a big story in Europe. It's going to be a

giant story in America in the days to come. We'll make sure of that. But it should have been the story two years ago, and you were only seeing it here. So as we close this out, I want to make sure that those individuals that lied to us, knowingly lied to us, their faces should live in infamy. more time. For those that will try to change this story, here is. This vaccine will stop the chain of transmission. Everyone who takes the vaccine is not just protecting themselves, but reducing their transmission to other people and allowing society to get back to normal. We can kind of almost see the end. We're vaccinating so very fast. Our data from the CDC today suggest, you know, that vaccinated people do not carry the virus, don't get sick.

Getting vaccinated and getting a booster shot when eligible can save your life and protect you and your family and friends from getting seriously ill and spreading infection. What do you think the probability is? 80%? Personally, I think it's 100%. I think that there's a reduction in transmission. Essentially, vaccines block you from getting and giving the virus.

We have all the vaccines we need. We just need our people to take. take it, A, for their own protection, for the protection of their family, but also to break the chain of transmission. You want to be a dead end to the virus. So when the virus gets to you, you stop it. You don't allow it to use you as the stepping stone to the next person. Failure to get vaccinated doesn't just put you at risk.

I think this is what is important. In a way, if it's not you who suffers, if you don't, simply, it's also other people. If you've done the right thing and gotten vaccinated, you deserve the freedom to be safe from COVID-19, to have your kids safe from COVID, to get back to the things you love. You're not going to get COVID if you have these vaccinations. If enough people get vaccinated, it actually halts transmission. The people who are not getting vaccines, you don't have to listen to a minority of people who are being harmful to the greater good and who are not acting on logic, reason, and science. I want everyone to be vaccinated. so that they're safe and so that their families are safe and so that life can feel a little more normal again.

Now we know that the vaccines work well enough that the virus stops with every vaccinated person. A vaccinated person gets exposed to the virus. The virus does not infect them. The virus cannot then use that person to go anywhere else. It cannot use a vaccinated person as a host to go get more people. That means the vaccines will get us to the end of this. It will go down in history as the greatest fraud in the history of mankind, foisted upon us by virtually every government in the world.

The people need to rise up now. This is what brings us together. When you watch the European Union coming together, it makes me think, and I've said it for years before this, that this issue will transcend race, religion, and creed. This truly is that issue that can bring us all together as we recognize our power as human beings, as humanity as brothers and sisters. But before we close out here, there are a few more faces that I think believed to also need to be remembered and live in infamy. And those are the faces of those that have just destroyed the CDC, I think, forever and their

credibility. Those members that voted yes, 15 to 0, Grace Lee, Lynn Bata, all. Oliver Brooks, Beth Bell, Wilbur Chen, Sybil Sienas, Matthew Daly, Camille Cotton, Jamie Lauer, Sarah Long, Veronica McNally, Catherine Poling, Pablo Sanchez, Nirov Shah, Helen Kip, Talbot. We will not forget you. We will not forget that in the face of a virus that had no effect on our children, you voted for a product that clearly does have an effect on our children. Myocarditis issues all around this vaccine.

no ability to stop transmission. Therefore, what good is this vaccine at all? While it is under threat, while it is under investigation, indictments happening in Europe, you in America at our regulatory agency forwarded the lie. You will be the last of the idiots that ever did this. You will not be forgotten. I said earlier that there is a great fundraising opportunity for us and a donation that will be matched today if you help us continue to do this work that as we've shown you has been just almost, and I want to overstated, but immaculate in many ways when it came to delivering you the truth before anyone else did. You are paying, I know you are, to have Fox on your television, to have MSNBC and all those cable news networks, whether you're watching

them or not. They're getting a far bigger check from the world than we are, but we're the only ones that got it right. Does that seem right? Does that seem fair? Let me just tell you what you are donating to when you are helping us. We are not some gigantic media empire that the New York Times likes to talk about, a Washington Post. And look, I take credit and some honor to the fact that they describe us as an empire. But the truth is today, just to do this show, you should see what it took. We were actually planning on maybe doing a pre-tape today because two of my major partners, Catherine Layton, who's my COO, and Patrick Layton, who was our creative director, they are in this fight because they had vaccine injuries to their children,

and specifically their young son Brennan, who is on the autism spectrum. And they can't travel. Why can they not travel? Because when they went to an airport recently, because of the issues with being on the spectrum, Brennan cannot go down that tunnel. He's terrified, grabs the floor, screams and yells, makes a big scene because it's just his sensory issues

that deal with that make him unable to sort of go down onto that plane. And so today, they had an appointment to go to Arizona. Luckily, there is a group at an airport, and American Airlines donates their planes so that you can bring your child. here they are on their trip heading, driving to Arizona in hopes that they can teach Brennan to feel comfortable and safe walking onto an airplane. This is the great group, ARC, that makes this possible.

I want to really give a thanks there. You can donate to them. This is such a huge gift to those people that deal with this. For all of us with neurotypical children, we have no idea what this daily experience is like, what it is like to not be able to travel to, in many ways, be a lot. imprisoned in your home. At the top of my staff are Katyn Patrick who deal with this all the time and make sure that we never forget what's going on here. They are pulled over on the side of a road today on this trip so that Catherine, who fires all the slides you just saw, all of those

clips that you're reading, so that she's really the best at it. They grabbed a hotel in the middle of their drive just so that she could fire remotely so that we were able to make this show happened live because we knew it was that important. So go ahead. Keep funding the billions of dollars that are going to Fox and the people that are lying to you while we don't even have a backup for Catherine to fire slides. It would be really great if we could do that. Today is an opportunity for you to make that happen. Your donation will be matched. Your donation that actually does help the truth get out. Does help make changes. Does help us bring lawsuits and will help protect those that try to bring these ridiculous mandates upon us. This is it. You can donate. You can use that QR code or just

donate on our website. Lastly, I just want to thank all of you. I know that this may be a difficult day. I know so many of this audience you're so actively involved rode into the CDC in hopes that we might be able to keep this atrocity from taking place. But I've said from the beginning, I believe there is a higher power. I believe that there's something much. much bigger going on here. And I've said it before. When I think back to my Bible studies in the moment where my dad would read to me and say, you know, Moses threw down his staff and it turned to a serpent and he was trying to get the children of Israel out of bondage. And Pharaoh says, okay, your magic is too great for me. Your God is too great. He would leave and it would say,

then God hardened Pharaoh's heart. And I always question that it was over and over again, by the way, go and read it, you know, whether it's frogs falling from the, sky and blood in the water. And, you know, it keeps saying God hardened Pharaoh's heart. I don't believe that these moments that are darkness are completely in the dark. It is clear that this is what is needed for us to find our true selves, our true divinity, our true God-given power, to remember that the laws that exist in the United States of America do not govern us. They do not tell us. Our constitution does not tell us what we're allowed to do. Our Constitution governs over our government on what they're allowed to do to our rights that are

given to us by God. God gave me this body. God did not invent that vaccine and if I don't want to take it, I don't have to and I never will have to. That is what we stand for here at the highwire. If you've been silent on this issue, you must now be vocal. If you haven't shared the videos before, hopefully this has enough science and integrity that you can now take it to your friends that are reeling in confusion over what's just happened and bring them, put their feet on the ground and say, yes, the truth has always been here. And now you need to march in the truth, or we will lose our freedom, our liberty. It's that important. For those of you about to vote, please take that thought into the voting booth. For those of you,

you going out to a dinner with friends or family, please take these thoughts in your conversation. Stand up. Stand for what you believe in. Stand in your truth. Because you are right and they are wrong. We'll continue to be right next week on the high wire and I'll see you there.