The Highwire with Del Bigtree - THE UN’S 2030 AGENDA GOES UP IN SMOKE

Episode Date: September 29, 2024

The UN has hit the reset button after their recent report concluded that the world isn’t catching on to their 2030 Agenda of globalist takeover and in their recent ‘Summit of the Future’ has now prioritized targeting young people. Is this the same playbook as Mao’s Cultural Revolution?Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-highwire-with-del-bigtree--3620606/support.

I want to bring your attention to something happening in New York City, starting tomorrow. And this is from the United Nations. They're bringing us something called the Summit of the Future. And this has been enough to raise some alarm on Capitol Hill with representatives. And it looks something like this. Okay. Later this week, the UN is going to hold a, quote, summit for the future. And they're going to produce, this is right from their website, an inner governmentally

negotiated, action-oriented, packed for the future with a chapter on transforming global governance. Ascending beyond the powers being sought by its subordinate agency, the WHO, the UN is seeking even broader and more powerful authority, as you will hear a lot about today. They don't want us to be subordinate to or governed by our Constitution. No, they want America to be subordinate to and governed by the UN, the World Health Assembly, and the WHO. And in fact, they intend to join with others at the UN summit this week to vote to award additional powers

to the UN Secretary General. They seek to facilitate the evolution of the UN from an international cooperative body to an international governing body. These powers would be triggered by any one of a number of so-called global emergencies, whether it was a so-called climate emergency, a health emergency, a cyber emergency, or a gun gun violence, emergency, whatever that's supposed to be, a financial emergency or whatever they deem appropriate.

I mean, when people try to ask, what do you do or what is your focus on? Is it political? This is it. I mean, put all the parties aside, this is our fight right now that we are bringing here on the high wire, which is this globalism, this global takeover that does not care about our Constitution, does not care about. I think they find America a pain in the butt right now. This Constitution is getting the way of a global governance, a new world order. This is a very scary development that this is even happening on our shores. Right. And you hit it right in the head there. They use kind of ambiguous language, flower language, you know, global governance.

That's a one world government. That's a new world order. That's all these conspiracies that have been talked about for all these years. And the politicians have been talking about this. You hear them kind of slip up and say a new world order, but this is it. This is what they're talking about. And what does it look like? Well, the World Economic Forum, the WF and their own website was hyping this. They wrote an article about it saying, what is this UN summit of the future? And in it, it said that it's basically pushing the

sustainable development goals. This is agenda 2030. And it says in this article, in footballing terms, the United Nations UN SDG summit in September 2023 was a moment to go back to the locker room and re-stratage because games are won or lost in the second half. So what are they talking about? there. Well, they have these goals, these sustainable development goals for 2030. What are those? Well, we've covered those before, but basically, you know, again, when you get past the ambiguous language, when you look at these documents, they're talking about rationing food, rationing energy, talking about ending private property, the global war on farmers. This is part of agenda 2030. You're seeing like the cutting off of the fertilizer, this rapid shift of society to net zero,

everything, and it goes on and on. And so they say, we need to go back to the locker room here and re-stratage. Why are they saying that? Well, they put out, the United Nations put out a report, a progress report, if you will, in 2024, and it was called the Sustainable Development Goals report. And what is it saying there? Well, it says the progress assessment carried out in 2024 reveals that the world is severely off track to realize the 2030 agenda. Wait, I want to have like, I want to have balloons and explosions right now. Well done everybody. All right. I love hearing that. It's a great sentence. This is good. Now, let's find your point on this.

You're going to love this part. Among the accessible targets only, ready for this, 17,17% display progress sufficient for achievement by 2030. So if you're going to school and you get a 17% on your exam, they're not doing very well. So they're really, really behind track. And so this brings us to the summit of the future. What is it? Well, as those reps were talking about there, they're not, it's not just a comment. where everyone can go and shake hands and smile and have some drinks, what they're talking about there is they're going to make policy there.

And two of the policies that they're talking about, one is a declaration of future generations and one's a global digital compact. And both of these have, you know, some teeth to them. The digital compact has this whole section on information and integrity, you know, talking about misinformation, disinformation, the normal words we see to censor people. And then they're talking about a whole society approach in the other one, whole society approach to climate justice, this turbocharging, trying to get to this end result of this net zero economy. And so when you look at their actual website, this UN website of the summit of the future, you can see in there that they want to focus on some key messages. So not only are they making this policy there they're going to vote on,

but you see this page here, that's the cover page, but then you flip to the next page, and you have five key messages. And it says the messages urge us to prioritize young people. So you look at each one of these numbers. Number one, let young people lead the way. Number two, political leaders must fight for every generation. So you go through there and you can see this undertone, you know, it's not really that hidden, is we're going to really target and focus on kids. We want kids to bring. We don't care about politicians anymore, doctors, researchers, scientists. No, no, because they only got a 17% of the way. We're failing. So now we want kids. And so you go into this. We want the captured audience that when you're not around, they've got them in schools for eight hours a day,

we can push a social agenda, we can really get them, turn them on their parents if you have been watching the separation of the family. And that's really gross. I mean, to just see, we're only at 17%. It's because we're talking to the adults. They're two, you know, their minds are made up. They believe in freedom still. Let's get them when they're young.

Right, right. And to your point, we are saying about the global government, you look in this document here, this is the case and point of the language they use. It says it's about making global governance more flexible, participatory, and in tune with the aspirations and needs of the world's young people and future generations. So we want the young people to lead this one world government, not the older people. And then you go look throughout the media as well, like the rest of the media, they're still banging the same drums.

So you go to the LA Times and they have this headline to fix climate anxiety and also climate change. we first have to fix individualism. So you go into the article and talks about how bad it is to be an individual. You need to be part of the collective. That's where this is going to get done. And then LA Times, again, they have this opinion piece. It's almost shameful to want to have children. Well, that's the part of the, you know, it's just, I can't believe they're actually putting these things out. But, you know, to talk about this, where are the older people? Well, the older people are right here. This is the headline from the BBC. Retiring in your 60s is becoming an impossible goal is 75, the new 65. So that's where

the older people are they're going to be working until they drop dead and not get their retirements and we can use that money to shift society over to the net zero but when we're talking about like you said indoctrinating the youth with bias science cultural programming on a global scale we have to look at history as a guidepost and i want to point people to the year 1966 in china we have the cultural revolution by communist leader maus et dung and what they did there was they they took children and they them into order called the Red Guards and there's pictures of this here and you have these kids groups large groups stadiums of kids and they have all of these you know the fist in the air revolutionaries you can see they're trained with weapons to bring in this cultural revolution

because the kids were malleable they were socially malleable you can see here they all have their their red communist book with their grand leader there and we go to stanford the historical account of this talking about the introduction of this cultural revolution and targeting the kids and it It says the chaos and violence increased in the Ottoman winter of 1966, as schools and universities closed so that students could dedicate themselves to, quote, the revolutionary struggle. They were encouraged to destroy the four olds, old customs, old habits, old culture, and old thinking, and in the process damaged many of China's temples, valuable works of art, and buildings. They also began to verbally and physically attack authority figures in society, including their teachers,

school administrators, communist party members, neighbors, and even their friends, relatives, and parents. At the same time, purges were carried out in the high ranks of the Communist Party. So this was highly coordinated. And again, this was done also in the, there was flavors of this in the Soviet Union under Stalin and Lenin. And so when you see global government bodies, this isn't just one, you know, offshoot of a nonprofit saying this. This is the UN, the WHO, the WEF. They're all on the same kick saying, let's go ahead and target children now. We have to look historically.

This is extremely dangerous. And this shows like the last ditch effort. They're going full steam for the kids. And they're going to start to really indoctrinate them hard because they're at halftime and they're losing bad. 17% to the attainable goals. They're nowhere close. So this is where they're going. All right.

Well, look, we've got to stand on top of it. But there's like a cornered shrew, if you will. They'll do anything now. I mean, they're losing the battle. But we can't forget they do have all the money. I mean, they've been cashing in. on this takeover for decades. We are finally waking up in the final hours. Thank God, but boy, we have work to do.