The Highwire with Del Bigtree - THE WORLD HEALTH ORDER
Episode Date: February 26, 2022Trudeau, Putin, Schwab, and The World Health Order; Surprise! CDC Hiding Data; Ex-BlackRock Manager Exposes Global Cover Up; Convoy Organizer’s Message to Biden & The WorldGuests: Alexandra Lavoie, ...Edward Dowd, Kyle SefcikBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-highwire-with-del-bigtree--3620606/support.
Transcript
Discussion (0)
Good morning, good afternoon, good evening, wherever you are out there in the world.
Guess what? It's time to step out onto the high wire.
I had a really nice conversation with someone that stopped me in the street the other day
and said they'd moved here all the way from Israel, actually to Texas where I live,
and I happen to run into her.
And she was talking about how in Israel, she said, Del, you just have no idea how important the high wire is to so many people
because it feels like we live in a crazy insane asylum.
that moment where we all get to come together and recognize that we're not alone.
And I really think that, you know, it made me really think about embracing that idea.
We really are not alone.
We are the same thinkers.
We've talked about it.
When you turn on the news everywhere you look, and none of it makes any sense.
I think we're all getting that sinking feeling that none of it's the truth.
Clearly all of the media seems to be owned by the same players that are manipulating politics
and everything all around the world.
COVID vaccines, you know.
And so as I was looking at that, and at the same time, people were asking me, you know,
what do you think of Russia and Ukraine?
And I'll be honest.
Like, you know, I live in a tunnel, basically.
I was so focused with my team on this issue of the pandemic and vaccines and all these things
that I really don't watch the news.
I mean, you know, I say to my own family, like, did you see this on the news?
Like, are you watching the highway?
Are you watching the show that I'm making?
Because, I mean, this is where we're focused.
But as I raised my head out, you know, and decide, well, what is happening around the
the world right now outside of COVID, you know, I was sort of shocked to see all of the different
things that are taking place all around the world. But to begin with, when we, you know, look at
what's been happening sort of this almost post-COVID moment, right, this post-pandemic where it's sort of
winding down in places, yet in other places, it seems like it's going the other direction and
trying to figure out where's that balance, what's happening. Well, I want to look at France,
because, you know, French, we know that the French tend to be, you know, they've been, they've been,
They've been protesting since the dawn of man.
When we think of protests, we always look to France.
But there has been so intense and so serious
that interaction between citizens, you know,
simply trying to go to restaurants and stand for freedom
against the police that are there.
And the images just continue to be shocking.
So let's just take a look at France
and what's been happening there.
Go to go.
The image is a brutality coming out of France,
and maybe we've gotten used to that.
Maybe we say, well, that's France.
That's how they handle things.
But even more shocking,
as we have been following this trucker's convoy in Canada
that have gone in and blocked Ottawa
and all the conversations we've been covering it for weeks
in Parliament, the discussions,
emergency, you know, state of emergency issued by Trudeau.
And in the middle of that, some images that I don't think we ever thought would come out of Canada.
I mean, when I think of Canada, I think of, you know, the Mountie and the red suit, you know,
seems like a, you know, pretty, you know, docile group of people.
I mean, not to put down Canada your great hockey players, but honestly, you tend to be pretty mellow.
And then to realize and watch as these sort of mounties in this image of, you know, sort of a posture and control in Canada being reduced to, you know,
troopers, you know, and moving in and trampling people.
I don't know if you saw these images, but if you have children in the room and maybe cover
their eyes right now, because it is incredibly shocking the total destruction of humanity
that is taking place in Canada.
Here's some of those images.
Oh, come on through.
Come on through.
What is happening here?
Wow.
this lady doing, trampling, trappling horses.
They just trampled that lady.
They just fully trampled that lady.
They just fully trampled that lady.
Now, the lady got fully trampled with the horse.
I mean, trampling people with horses, a photo over that image right there shows that one of these people that was trampled, obviously was handicapped, you know, using some form of a medical stroller device.
I don't know if they have a broken leg or what.
But just, you know, is this Canada?
Is this what we knew to be that socialist, you know, neighbor to the United States of America?
I'm sure they are shocked themselves.
But the rhetoric coming out of the government there and the lies and the seat and how they see their own citizens.
I mean, look at this ridiculous statement made inside of the House of Politics there.
How many guns need to be seized?
How much vitriol do we have to see of honk honk,
which is an acronym for Hail Hitler,
do we need to see by these protesters on social media?
I did not know that honking your horn twice
was an acronym for Hail Hitler.
I'd better make note because, God forbid, you know,
oh, did I just do that?
You know, it's stormtroopers smashing in your window.
Now you're a Nazi for honk of your horn twice.
I mean, unbelievable that people in Canada
are even accepting that kind of language
It is so incredibly absurd.
Yet when we hear from the people themselves in the streets, it's a totally different story.
Here's a great interview by Rebel News of just one of those individuals standing for medical freedom and peace.
Well, I think this is one giant narrative.
It's kind of like a movie.
And it's been that way all along where they bring the cameras here.
It's like a big film set.
They bring all the police to point the cameras where they want.
and then they provoke, they push us.
It's been peaceful the whole time
the last three weeks.
Yesterday, we were all peaceful here.
The police were the ones pushing.
Most of the police are, they seem like
just people doing their job.
It's a tough job. It's probably the toughest
days of their career. But what's
happening here is not being
what's told in the media.
And literally, it is a movie.
They have a narrative. They're following
Trudeau's hate that's being, that's
dividing us.
Thank God there are some media outlets that are actually reporting on what's going on.
Last night, I witnessed a cameraman from Global literally violently shoved someone,
turn on the camera, and then the reporter get on camera.
That literally happened. Thankfully, someone was filming it,
and they reported it in our pressing charges against that cameraman.
What we're seeing here is the media that's taking part in this division to fool people across the
this country, across the world, about what's happening.
And what's happening here is we're not being divided.
We're actually coming together as one, which is what the government's afraid of.
So people need to wake up to actually realize what this is about.
This isn't a racist movement.
What's happening is we're just being divided again.
So thank you for reporting on what's the truth here.
I love how your references.
They're making a movie here, basically, pushing an agenda,
setting up shots and getting the shot they want.
to push their agenda out.
I know we all have friends that see the events in Canada
totally differently than those of us
that are watching, you know, rebel news and places like that,
the high wire, where you're actually seeing
all of these different people coming together.
They're not racist, every walk of life standing in solidarity.
In this case, carrying gas cans to those guys in the trucks
that are, you know, trying to stay warm,
keep everything calm, peace everywhere,
and yet the media and Trudeau are trying to talk
as though this is some sort of, you know, Hitler revolution.
It's absolutely crazy. They're not getting away with it.
But when we think about those on the ground, like, as he said, so many of the news agencies lying,
but thank you to the ones that are not lying. Rebel News, we've had much of their footage
and been thankful for their footage coming out of the convoy up in Canada.
But check out this shocking image of one of the reporters on the front lines with Rebel News.
It used to be that if you were carrying press credentials and a microphone,
even the middle of a Vietnam War, a world war, the action went around you.
We have an understanding across the entire world to leave the press alone.
Obviously, Canada is so lost now that we have to see images like this.
It's hard.
moment captured there where, you know, a canister was shot, tear gas, at point-flank range
against Alexa LeVois, who was a reporter there just trying to get the story. Alexa joins me now.
Alexa, I, first of all, as a reporter, I want to say you were really putting it on the line,
but were you under the impression that a reporter should have been out of the line of fire when
the police saw clearly you're wearing a badge, you're holding a microphone?
I was actually targeted.
I'm probably sure because the gun was point on me
and I've been hit by the club three times
just before I got shot in my legs.
So the thing is like I'm not even sure,
but I think they wanted me to stop.
As you know, my camera person, Guillermo Roa,
was filming and he got paper spray as well
in his camera, but in his eyes as well.
So clearly,
they didn't want nobody to film what it was going on in the front line,
especially everything was so peaceful.
And the violence had been provoked.
They tried to provoke a reaction from the protester that was just there
and holding the line peacefully.
And no violence was coming from them.
The only violence that I saw so far was coming from the line of the police officer.
As a reporter, when you watch the news reporting the opposite in mainstream television saying that the protesters are violent, they're white supremacists, what is it like?
What do you think of those reporters that are doing that when you think, you know, that's my profession, those are my peers?
What do you have to say of those?
Because they're a part of this.
In fact, in some ways, I believe they're responsible.
Do you see that the same way?
Like, I'm in the ground since the 28th of January.
I spend like now I'm still in Ottawa.
It will be months that I'm here every day,
almost 20 hours per day reporting on the ground.
And what I saw so far is not white supremacists,
it's not racist people, it's nothing of that.
It's loving people who help each other,
who give their time,
they give their money, what they have for food,
and they're coming.
day on the ground to help each other and it's nothing of what they say so far from the mainstream
media of the state media. I know that they report on the swastika flag. So surprisingly, it was on
the side of a hotel really hiding and nobody saw it. Only the mainstream media. But I don't know.
They were really lucky to see it. But I didn't see any of that.
here any violence nothing of that so and the woman just for let you know she's a I I
I had the chance to have an interview with her she's a First Nation woman okay
and she had a problem with to walk and now she have a problem with she have a broken
bone trampled by the horse we're talking about yeah exactly yes yes she's a
She's from the first nation.
Okay, very good.
And so she hurt her shoulder also when she was trampled by the horse?
Yeah.
When you, you know, as we watch this from around the world, these images are very shocking, especially in Canada.
I mean, maybe, I mean, do we have the wrong perception?
I've always, I mean, I went to school for a little while in Canada.
Really just the nicest, most caring people.
I think it's more shocking coming out of Canada than almost anywhere else.
the world. Is this how it's always been or is there a shift in the energy from the, you know,
the politicians in their view of the citizens of Canada?
It's so funny because at the beginning of the Freedom Convoy, the police was really nice,
waving at the protesters, same like helping them, giving them some eater for their hand.
And when Prime Minister Trudeau went out and said, no, we need to clear.
clear the place out. We will invoke the Emergencies Act. We saw that the police was not the same
minding. We saw that they received order. The communication was not the same. They changed
really a lot of their behavior. They gave some warning paper in the world role. Until that
Friday, everything started police action and they break through.
When we watch this now, do you feel like, and I know you're a reporter, not necessarily an activist, you're there to capture it, is the sense on the ground that this is working? Is this a way as other nations struggle to be heard by their governments? You know, we're watching Austria right now under incredible crackdowns, lockdowns, their rights being fined if they don't get vaccinated. France, other nations like this, are peaceful protests like this successful anymore?
Is this a way to approach this or is it just futile?
But we can see that it's the same thing that's happened, not only in Europe, in Austria,
in Australia, not really far ago, we have our reporter, Avi Yemeni, that is there and report on the ground.
If you're not following the narrative, you are part of the population that we are not understand,
and we are destroying them, we are diabolizing them.
And so it's just so sad because these people are the one most of the time who have suffering from the mandates, from the lockdown.
And they are there everything.
They lost their job.
They lost some members of their family because they suicide.
Some of them economically, they have no...
money that's coming for their family.
And the prime minister doesn't try to, at least try to communicate with them
and try to negotiate maybe a middle to reach, make everybody happy.
I have a narrative that they are all following,
but surprisingly, nobody says, oh, this event is a super spreader event
for COVID-19.
Nobody have talking about COVID-19 anymore.
They were just like,
we need to clear out.
This movement is dangerous.
Dangerous for what?
It's all peaceful people.
It's all family, children,
women, elderly people.
They are not there to disturb anybody.
They are there for having their freedom back.
Is this event having been in the middle of the bit?
Is this, are you going to continue reporting
or have you had enough for you backing away now?
Now, I will continue to report until, like, all the truth came out because it's, we don't have the same narrative coming from all the media.
We need to have someone in the ground reporting on the other side of the story.
So what is really happening?
And people are craving of it.
It's why now we reach almost, we reach more than one million subscribers just recently.
So that makes us the most media subscriber in Canada.
So that's mean that people are craving for truth.
Well, first of all, I want to thank you personally and Rebel News for all the work you've been doing.
We've been using your footage.
You've been sharing with us.
I want to thank you.
It is going to be, you know, alternate media, I think, that is going to sort of shift this discussion around the world.
And we, too, are experiencing the same thing.
We're doing better numbers than Fox programs.
and CNN and MSNBC because I think the truth ultimately prevails.
In order to follow you, everyone that wants to follow the work that Alexa is doing,
we have her website.
Here you go, Rebel News.
Stand with Alexa on February 19.
You can go ahead and donate here.
Standwithalexa.com.
You're doing amazing work.
I think you should, Sue.
We want to see.
I mean, these are the types of things we've got to make them, you know,
hold them accountable for their actions against humanity.
and you represent that on the front line.
Would you say that you have a positive feeling
about the future of Canada and perhaps the world,
or are you very concerned?
I would say my personal opinion,
I would be a little bit concerned
if they try to stop the protest
because it's the freedom of expression that you stop
and is a right of the population.
So my concern will see, like,
in the next couple of weeks coming,
what it will look like.
But now they abandon the emergency hack.
That is actually a good thing.
I'm actually really happy of it.
But let's see how the government will act in the next few weeks coming.
Okay, very good.
Alexa will continue to follow you.
Thank you for being such a hero,
a champion for truth,
and representing what it really means to be a journalist.
I would say 99.99% of journalists around the world
should follow your lead instead of carrying a process.
propaganda agenda. So thank you for your work. It's an honor to get the opportunity to talk to you.
Thank you very much. Have a great thing. You too. Take care. So as I was sitting here watching this,
you know, happened to Alexa, but watching Canada descend into authoritarian rule it appears,
you know, emergency. And by the way, we talked about this last week, you know, prompted by President Biden
telling them, use your federal powers, just move in there and just clear those people out of there,
bringing the police, bringing tanks, whatever it takes,
as though this is how we do things in America.
Is this what we can expect here?
But then, as you well know, as we're watching the news,
it's almost like COVID-19, as she said, has disappeared.
These police beating on people, you're not seeing mainstream,
but what you are seeing is another shocking moment in the middle of all this.
I mean, right on the heels of the pandemic,
it's like we're almost through a breath of fresh air,
and then this is what we're all watching in the news.
Tonight, the warning for President Biden that the world is witnessing the beginning of a Russian invasion in Ukraine.
Russian President Vladimir Putin has told the Russian people he is now recognizing the independence of two separatist regions of Ukraine.
New video shows that Russian tanks are on the move. Despite the appearance of heavy artillery, Moscow claims that these are just peacekeeping forces.
Russia has amassed more than 150,000 troops around Ukraine's borders.
Who in the large name does Putin think gives him the right to deal?
declare new so-called countries on territory that belong to his neighbors.
Russia's military is ready for a full-scale invasion, which could come as soon as tonight.
If Russia chooses to move against any NATO country, they will be met with the full force of
American and allied might.
Ukraine's president drafting a state of emergency.
President Zelenskyy said the future of Europe's security is being tested in Ukraine.
The country bracing for a full.
blown war. It's no longer a question if but when. Under the cover of darkness, we are beginning
to hear a series of explosions. I just wanted to play for you some of what they're hearing in Ukraine
now a few hours before the sun comes up. We're putting this story together yesterday. I planned on
sort of showing all these different perspectives. Of course, late last night, the bombing began in the
Ukraine. Our hearts go out to all of those involved. I'm not here to try and choose sides or even
try to fully understand what that interaction, that war as it appears, is all about.
But, you know, here it is Russia declares war launches attack and Ukraine explosions reported.
But what I do want to ask you right now is, are you like me?
Are you saying, boy, you know, nothing would really erase the fact that we are seeing
rising death rates all over the world from COVID.
We keep reporting on negative efficacy, the fact that the vaccine isn't working.
Everyone's got egg on their face.
And if you just kind of want to turn the page and move on and maybe save your butt in the next election, a war really would come in handy.
Now, I'm not saying.
I know people say, are you saying that the United States of America is somehow involved with, you know, goading Russia into a war against Ukraine?
No, not necessarily.
But I am asking myself, is there something that brings all three of these stories together?
Trudeau in Canada, Macron, in France, beating other people.
and now Putin in Russia starting a war with Ukraine.
What, you know, like, what would pull all these things together?
That's what was going on in my mind.
And then this video came up last week.
It's an old video out of 2017, an interview with Klaus Schwab at the World Economic Forum, something we've talked a lot about.
This is the guy that dreams of a future where nobody owns anything.
Everyone is renting everything.
Look what he said are the players that he has said.
controls, listen to their names.
When I mentioned our names like Mrs. Merkel,
even Vladimir Putin and so on,
they all have been young global leaders
of the World Economic Forum.
But what we are very proud of now,
the young generation, like Prime Minister Trudeau,
President of Argentina and so on,
that we penetrate the cabinets.
So yesterday I was at a reception for Prime Minister Trudeau and I would know that half of this cabinet or even more half of this cabinet are for our actually young global leaders of the World Economic Forum.
That's true in Argentina as well.
It's true in Argentina and it's true in France now.
I'm a president, who is a young global leader.
Young global leaders of the World Economic Forum, you know, he mentions Trudeau,
the president who had just been elected that time, Macron.
That's in our pocket.
We're filling their cabinets.
We've got Putin in our pocket.
You know, and so when we sit here and I watch the news saying,
our enemy, Russia, you know, ask ourselves, well, if they are our enemy,
certainly those that are controlling them should be our enemy too.
But wait, we have a problem because we're.
We're taking orders from them too.
Remember the build back better plan written by Klaus Schwab, voiced by Trudeau, voiced out of New
Zealand and here in the United States of America, Biden himself standing at a podium,
build back better, all of our politicians saying, I love Klaus Schwab, so does Putin, so does
Macron, so does Trudeau.
What is going on here?
That's what I'm asking you.
What is actually going on here?
You know, we keep thinking we have borders, we keep thinking we have enemies, but are we all just
pawns in some giant game. This is Putin speaking just this last year at the World Economic
Forum event in Davos, Switzerland. You're going to have to read it, so pay attention. I get it.
This isn't like any other news channel. I'm not giving you five seconds. I want you to really absorb
what Putin said to all of his friends in Davos.
As I just as I've
I've
just
we
have
we've
talked
in 92
year
and in
the time
in the
I'm
definitely
not quite
I'm
this
this
I want to
thank you
thank you
today is
there's
to give
the expert
to the
expert of
society
that's
about this
supermire
in the
publicer
thanks
of the
Ufferns Schuade.
Klaus, now, I've just about
my
conversation with President
of the United States
and about
the redlending
of the
of the
uncients of
notepatelan,
it's a shot in
the right in
but,
but it's
still is
what is
what is called
on spirale.
As is
not,
the no-
not-gotowness
to resolve
about
the situation,
in 20-vety,
over-
overnosed catastrophes of the Second World War.
Of course,
now,
this global,
a hot conflict,
I'm notews,
in principle,
but very,
I'd imagine,
would be
the end of civilization.
But,
I'll,
I'll say,
might have
not be
not-presentable
and not
uprovaling.
If,
obviously,
for this
not
not to be
not to
do that
to the
there's
there's,
there's
even maybe,
there's
to be the possibility to be with a
the real-shroubom in
the world's
and a trellatim of
the wariboy
of all
with all
with the
against
through the
of the
of the
of the
of the
of the
not of
the traditional
of
we in
we in
Russia, we're
in
the
of the
of the
not of the
not of
the
This is this social and
the tenetious crisis
is overarchivates
negative demographic
consequences,
because of which
people risk
to get
to get
the civilizational
and cultural
matrikes.
Our
our
our own
to
to be able to
to avoid
a kind of
an anti-utopia,
to
to ensure
to a
positive,
and,
I mean, incredible as he talks about a dystopian future.
I think we're all asking ourselves that question.
I don't know.
I mean, I am clearly not choosing sides.
I don't know what side there is, is my point.
What is happening here?
We're all being divided against each other, as the gentleman in Canada says.
This isn't who we are.
We're coming together, yet they're lying about us.
There's wars going on.
All of this at a time where we've talked time and time again
about the financial destruction of most of the world.
right now, going to debt. Is this some wag the dog moment? Well, imagine if you decided to ask,
this was a question given in the Parliament of Canada just recently asking about Klaus Schwab and
how many of you. He said, remember, he said, we have injected ourselves. We have penetrated
the cabinets of many of these nations. You got to wonder how many have been penetrated
here in the United States of America. Look what happens when that question is asked in Canada.
Thank you, Mr. Speaker, and I listened to my colleague's speech.
I had a constituent that wanted me to ask a question about outside interference to our democracy.
Klaus Schwab is the head of the World Economic Forum, and he bragged how his subversive W.W.EF,
World Economic Forum, has quoted infiltrated governments around the world.
He said that his organization had penetrated more than half of Canada's cabinet.
And I was wondering, in the interest of transparency, could the moment?
member please name which cabinet ministers are on board with the W.E.F.'s agenda. My concern is the
Deputy. Order, order, order. I know the member was in a really good, good question there,
but the audio is really, really bad, and the video is really, really bad as well.
And I apologize. I don't know if the member, okay.
The audio sounded pretty good to me, but look, I wasn't in the room. Maybe it was legitimate.
for those of you that have gone before these school board meetings
that have gone in front of, you know, the Senate or the congressional hearings like I have,
and you see them basically tuned completely out if they can shut you down or turn off your mic, they do.
But it's a really good question.
It's a question we should all be asking ourselves in every nation in the world.
Will you please tell us how many of yourselves consider yourselves to be young leaders from Davos
and the World Economic Forum that plans on making.
all of us renters around the world with the Great Reset. Is that what's happening? Is Putin bombing Ukraine
just another part of the Great Reset? It's certainly a question you should be asking yourself.
And I'm going to get deeper into that. I've got a fantastic show today. You know, I got Kyle Sefchik,
who is one of the truckers that is leading one of the convoys across America now. We're going to check
in with him. And then I've got the former equity portfolio manager at Black Rock,
downward Dowd is joining me, and we're going to get a perspective that you probably haven't heard
yet on all of this. Get ready to have your mind blown, especially by my next guest, Jeffrey
Jackson. Once again, Jeffrey, there's just so much to report on. I think eventually we're actually
talking about giving you your own show where we can just hand you all of the things that didn't
make it into the high wire. So people can expect that coming soon. But what made it into the
highwire this week? What are the highlights? Well, let's stick with Canada for a second.
So as I was preparing this segment, last night, suddenly something happened in Canada that really shocked a lot of people following this. Take a look.
All right.
Dogs and cats, living together.
We were very clear that the use of the emergencies act would be limited in time.
When we invoked it, it would be in place for up to 30 days.
But we said that we would lift it as soon as possible.
We've held updates and briefs.
with ministers and officials every day, often multiple times a day.
And today, after careful consideration, we're ready to confirm that the situation is no longer an emergency.
Therefore, the federal government will be ending the use of the Emergencies Act.
We are confident that existing laws and bylaws are now sufficient to keep people safe.
Of course, we'll continue to be there to support provincial and local authorities if and when needed.
That dude's cadence, man. I'm sorry. Does anyone feel like you can trust him far? You can throw him right now. And now that I couldn't get anyone in my government to agree with my Emergency Powers Act and every single civil rights group in Canada is suing me, I've decided to withdraw it for your own good.
an incredible moment.
It truly is dogs and cats living together.
I mean, we are living in insane times.
By the way, as I said before, we have a brand new system.
So there's a couple things that they're still working out.
But I know it's going to be rocking once we get it all together.
But go ahead.
Yeah.
He was defending.
Trudeau was defending this emergency attack just days before this statement.
And the convoy and the protests and the blockades of the borders,
those were mostly over.
last week.
So he was defending at the beginning of this week
and he comes out and says this.
And, you know, people are saying, well,
a lot of people were saying this was for politics.
He made this emergency act and made it go forward
because of politics and he's ending it because of politics.
Right.
And I started looking, is there any evidence of this?
Has he ever played politics before?
And I found this, this blog from 2015
that the Huffington Post ran.
Listen to this.
Why Canada will become a dictatorship under Durdow?
This wasn't written.
this week. This was written in 2015. It says here, this is when he was the liberal party leader.
It says the liberal party under Justin Trudeau has become a dictatorship. The leader of that party
does what he wants, when he wants, and no one dares question him. Now that we know that
Trudeau runs his party like a dictatorship, we must ask ourselves, is there any indication
he wouldn't do the same as the leader of Canada? It goes on to say, could Prime Minister
Trudeau be trusted to make decisions for the good of the country, not just for his personal
self-worth. Would Trudeau call in the police to enforce his vision? Let's hope we never have the
opportunity to ask those questions. And of course, those questions were asked and we saw how they were
answered. And just after our show last week, the police moved in and they cracked down hard as we
saw from those videos on the protesters in Ottawa. And the headline here, interesting enough,
the parliament was supposed to vote on this emergencies act. Police crackdown forces Canada
Parliament to cancel itself. So this act,
was declared dictatorially by Trudeau.
It wasn't even voted upon democratically.
So they reconvened on Monday this past Monday here, and they did vote this through.
So this is kind of a couple days ago.
Seriously.
I mean, I'm glad they signed their name to that document.
So we will never forget who was against the citizens and siding with what appeared to be a dictator all along.
Yeah.
And so here's the headline.
As this Emergency Act passed on Monday, it says vote on Trump.
Those Use of Emergencies Act passes with NDB, NDP support.
It was voted on passed by 185 in favor 151 against.
But notice on that headline, it said, NDP, that's the new Democratic Party in Canada.
One of their major planks of that political platform is defund the police and stopping police brutality and violence.
And I can't help but laugh because they did.
When the chips were down, I guess, they did the exact opposite.
They brought in the most militarized police to literally run people over with horses, beat them with batons, knee them while they're on the ground.
And we saw all the rest of it.
So like you said, it's really great that these people show their true colors when peaceful protests were upon their front door.
Now, finishing off here, one of the protest heads, I guess, or rally heads, this was tomorrow Lynch.
She headed up the GoFundMe page.
She was detained, arrested.
and this is the headline here, key convoy organizer Tamara Lynch denied bail. So in the
article here, the court judge said, your detention is necessary for the protection and safety
of the public. Now, she's being held without bail on something called counseling to commit
mischief. So mischief is this big catch-all term with interfering with, you know,
everyday life, with government actions, with people's everyday goings. She was counseling people to
committed. So she didn't commit herself. She was denied bail. This can be basically any time for
a first time offense is just a fine. It can hold up to 10 years. But since she was denied bail,
she is going to sit in a provincial court until the judge rules on a decision. This could be months.
So she is essentially detained as a political prisoner of Trudeau, I guess, at this point is what we're
looking at. And what this this, this, this emergencies act did in Canada is it caused a lot of people to
I'm seeing posts all over the place.
People are pulling their money from the banks.
It's atrocious for bank commerce.
They're bringing it into smaller local federal credit unions.
But a lot of...
Well, what do you expect when you freeze people's accounts, right, for simply donating?
I saw a story of...
Yeah, I think it was an ice cream shop owner that her entire business was destroyed
because they printed that she had given $250 to try and feed some of the truckers.
She said, I didn't really even know what I was, you know, donating to.
Yet they opened up their accounts.
I mean, all of this, they froze their accounts.
I mean, just really, really crazy things.
And I think, too, we talked about this last week.
Those people that keep saying, you know, Bitcoin or cryptocurrencies of the future,
I mean, it just feels like at any moment these governments can just turn all these things.
I don't know.
I mean, it's not my area of a specialty.
We'll bring in someone to talk about that.
But boy, when they just want to shut you down, they certainly have no problem doing it
and freedoms just right out the door.
Right.
And yeah, we did see that.
And so there are core cases now going on.
They're not being dropped.
since this Emergency Act has been revoked.
We have the Canadian Constitutional Foundation
and the Canadian Civil Liberties Association
are asking for a hearing Canadian federal court.
And then even a Berta's premier, Jason Kinney,
announced that he's going to do a court challenge.
And this isn't so much, obviously, to revoke the act
because it's already revoked.
They're looking for justification from Chudeau
for this decision.
So they want publicly accessible information
on why the government decided to do this act.
The only way the Canadian government can get out of this
is if they call for national security or cabinet secrecy on this information, which, you know, is very
likely.
But that's still ongoing now, these court proceedings and holdings.
So that's really what we're going to keep an eye on at this point to see if they come forward to give the evidence.
Because we still don't understand what evidence besides some truckers honking their horn outside there was.
Well, we know what that means now.
That's right.
Let's switch over to the United States.
So this happened just recently.
and we're collating some information on it, but the FDA just received a new head or perhaps an old head.
Biden picked a new head. Biden picks Robert Caliph to lead FDA. People are blasting his pick as an insult.
Now, keep in mind, for a year, the FDA really had like a substitute teacher in there, and it really had no head in Janet Woodcock.
And a lot of people, including Dr. Malone on this show, was saying that, you know, she was going to step
down at any time, which she has now, obviously. But in doing some research here, much like Trudeau,
I look back into the archives, and I found this article from 2016 in Salon Magazine. And this was
from 2016 when Caliph was the picked at that point to head the FDA the first time. It says the
FDA now officially belongs to Big Pharma. And it goes on there to talk about his extensive,
extensive ties to the pharmaceutical companies. We're talking Merck, Johnson and Johnson.
astrozenica regenerate. I mean, the list, we'd be here for five minutes talking about this list
of interest that he lists as conflicts of interest in his research. But one of the things he did
was he defended Vioxx. That was way back today. And if anybody, and here's the article,
this from 2004, he did a PBS interview and he was still director of Duke's Clinical Research
Institute. And if anybody remembers Viox was the painkiller, it was put on the market, the FDA
fast-tracked it, and
1999, I believe
it was. By 2000, Merck
already knew Merck was the maker of
the drug. They already knew that this thing was
through its internal research was causing
blood clots, heart attacks, death.
They kept it on the market. FDA kept it
on the market. And here's what he said in that
article at the time. You know, he gets this
home run position to talk about this in
2004. He says, quote,
I would say that Merck played by the rules
from everything that I've seen, including some of
the recent things that have been in the newspaper,
and emails.
Now, remember, he was wrong about that
because if you look at history,
here's what the headlines really said.
Merck pays billions for Vioxx.
Merck agrees to pay $4.8.8 billion.
Yes, in the Vioxx settlement.
So let's take a little deeper dive into Caliph here.
So here's one of the headlines.
What has it been doing the last couple of years
during the pandemic? A lot of people want to know this.
And here's a headline.
appointing Google's health DC strategists would bring risk to FDA's credibility.
And looking at that headline, I say what credibility in the FDA?
But it says here in the article, in September 2019, Caliph stepped down from his Duke position
for a full-time job at Google running the policy and strategy teams, translation of the lobbying teams for Google Health.
Keep in mind, 2019, right before the pandemic began, he jumps into data analytics.
Now, let's go right to Google Health and check out what they were doing from their own.
words during the pandemic. Here it is using technology to help take on the COVID-19 pandemic.
It says here, we are maintaining a sharp focus during this rapidly evolving time of uncertainty
on providing authoritative information and resources to help keep people safe, informed, and
connected. Our major COVID response efforts are focused around keeping people informed with
trusted information. So it's not authoritarian, it's just authoritative information. I mean,
we're talking about the Google. So now this guy, not only is a farm,
that already worked for the FDA and tried to exonerate a company he had previously worked for.
Ultimately, they ended up killing 100,000 people or more before they had to pay out billions of dollars.
But now he's in this incredible cabal we've been talking about with big tech.
So he is the perfect guy to bring in the censorship and everything around the pharmaceutical companies
because people like us are trying to get the truth out to the people that we can't trust guys like this.
And it seems like this is the battleground now. So one of the first statements he put out after becoming FDA head was looking like this. Here's the headlines from Epoch Times. New FDA chief says he will prioritize fighting misinformation. So we're not talking about maybe doing a better job in drug applications, better job, maybe getting some of the conflicts of interest. Preventative treatments for COVID, you know, all of these things, maybe investigating, creating a better job.
data collection system for those people either injured by the vaccine or knowing why they're in the
hospital. Like, you know, those kinds of things that you would expect from a modern society.
No, let's just shut anybody up. That's my number one job that is asking questions of the work
we do here. You know, the FDA is the place he should start investigating the misinformation
campaign. Right. And, you know, about one week before he slid into that FDA position,
we have this memo coming out, interestingly enough, from the Department of Homeland.
security. This is their summary of terrorism threat to the U.S. homeland. It says here the United
States remains in a heightened threat environment fueled by several factors, including an online
environment filled with false or misleading narratives and conspiracy theories and other forms of
misdisp, and malinformation. So again, we're seeing this as a major battleground for not only
government agencies that have no business in policing this stuff. And governments that have no
business in censoring speech. We've seen this with Joe Rogan, and now we're seeing this as really
there's now this target. A lot of these agencies are looking forward. And as this COVID pandemic and the
pandemic response, you know, really starts to come to a close here. We're reporting on this,
like slow trickle for the last couple weeks here. We're seeing a lot of people trying to make
their moves for the next big thing off the back of this momentum. And with this misinformation,
we have California Governor Newsom. He's going to do his own
state unit, his personal state unit, run out of his capital office, basically. This is the headline.
Newsom rips into Fox News, O-A-N Newsmax, calling them propaganda networks, announces new state
unit to combat misinformation. So you notice all those news agencies are people that really have
reported more balanced on people like Newsom, people like Cuomo during the, during the pandemic,
talking about some of their issues that they had there. So it looks like they're going to have kind
a state-sponsored media group.
Newsombs, for example, is going to collaborate with 250 media outlets.
So you can expect basically just a true propaganda machine.
I mean, that's really what.
I have a group to stop propaganda.
Now, let's go ahead and say what that is.
Put the mirror on this.
You are starting a propaganda machine.
You have the funding from the government.
You have Homeland Security now behind you.
I mean, these are scary, scary developments that really do make us reflect upon.
historical moments when other leaders didn't like what was being said about them. What do they do?
They start controlling the media narrative. Right. And you know, for anybody new to this,
I see a lot of doctors and scientists and thank God for them stepping up over the past couple of years.
But anybody new to this discussion, in 2015, we have SB277 in California. This started this kind
of nationwide push to mandate all types of vaccines and to remove a lot of the barriers between these
pharmaceutical companies and at the children for schools. But we're getting this push out of California
again now as this pandemic's winding down. And here's some of the headlines coming out. There's a
slew of bills. California bill would allow kids 12 and up to get vaccines without parents. So here we go.
We're trying to eliminate parental consent for to get kids vaccinated.
By the way, just for everyone out there, we first saw this in Washington, D.C.
I can has a case in court right now. We're waiting for a decision at any moment. We have been fighting
that new law there that again allows young children to make a decision to be injected with a
totally experimental product that could potentially manipulate their DNA if we are going to at least
trust in the words of the inventor of MRI vaccines, Dr. Robert Malone, leading to all sorts of
unknown health benefits. We're talking about myocarditis over and over again. This
detriment to these kids and now they get to make that choice without the parent even being involved.
And I want to point out how incredibly terrifying this is. Imagine, let's just say, you know,
it is rare. We have a rare incident where you've been injured by the vaccine. If your kid got
that vaccine and these bills always carry one part, which is the insurance company that's
paying for it is hiding it from the parents. The doctor's going to hide it from the parents.
Now you're the enemy and your child has done something you know nothing about. So let's say they
had that anaphylactic moment at home. It didn't happen in front of the doctor.
seizing in your in your house you rush them to the hospital you don't know what's going on and
maybe they say oh it looks like a blood clot and they fire a heparin into their body well we already
know that they could also be you know suffering from thrombocytes opinion which would be a lack of
blood clots and now you have a whole problem and nobody knows what's going on because you've been
taken out of the equation of the medical decisions to be able to say what did they just eat what just
happened i don't know i mean you know they had some carrots you know for lunch today
on myocarditis at that point, you know, now that you're talking about this.
Right. Because a lot of, I think all of the cases that CDC and ASIP were following were
people or kids that were presented to the hospital emergency rooms, who do you think's taking
them there? The 12-year-old kid driving himself there or herself? It's the parents, and they're not
going to know to do that. So other things coming out of California as well. This is our friend
Richard Pan, California lawmakers targeting kids and working classes for mandatory COVID
vaccines. So here we go. You know, we have a COVID vaccine.
that's, you know, effectiveness.
The children and the poor.
Let's go after the children of the poor.
It's a great idea, said to Richard Pan.
What a beautiful human being he's turning out to be.
Right.
Never met a vaccine he didn't like,
including one that's really not that effective
against stopping transmission or infection,
but we're going to mandate it anyway.
And then here, one following bill,
this is the final one here.
California bill targets doctors' websites.
Here we go, pushing vaccine insurformation.
So that's going to be, if this bill passed,
that's going to be law in California.
And this bill doesn't just target the doctors.
If a doctor treats a patient outside of standard operating care, which is ivermectin, hydroxychloriccene,
Budesinine, they're going to be put up in front of the medical board and have their license reviewed.
And this is going to be in...
So there you go.
You save someone's life in California that you could lose your license.
You're not supposed to treat them with anything.
Let them almost die.
Then bring them in, give them, you know, remdesivir, shut down their kidneys, throw them on a vent.
If you do that, we'll celebrate you and give you awards.
But God forbid you use a drug that's working all around the world.
pull your license. For those of you in California, I just want to say my heart goes out to you.
We're all, you know, we all left California to come to Texas. We're refugees.
Come on down. The water's warm here, folks. I don't know what you're going to be able to do there.
I mean, I'm glad you're there. Obviously, we're going to be rallying there very soon.
Announcement coming just around the corner, working out final details. But my God, what has
happened to California? Such a beautiful state, such beautiful people. It's like what we're watching
in Canada, of all the places in the world, you've got to destroy California.
Yeah, and Del, here's a quick summary of how media manipulation works in one headline.
So check this next headline out.
COVID won't end up like the flu.
It will be like smoking.
So as this talking point of COVID is just a bad flu was a conspiracy theory for so long,
now that's being accepted in the mainstream.
That's what the data shows.
And so they take this talking point and spin it.
So the need for the vaccine here is kind of waning with its effectiveness.
effectiveness, the boosters are not effective, you know, we can't boost forever. So they're going to say,
let's try to, let's try the one last effort here to make this thing last as long as we can.
So they're going to say it's more like smoking. And what does smoking do? Well, we have to look at
insurance premiums, things like that we can tack it on to. So it says here in the article,
long-term actions for COVID might include charging the unvaccinated a premium on their health
insurance, just as we do for smokers or distributing frightening health warnings about the
perils of remaining unvaccinated. So right there, they're setting up kind of an agenda. They're
drumming up some support to maybe get this thing. We've seen headlines like this before, but they're
trying again to get this thing looped into insurance premiums again, trying to... You know, I have an idea,
and I've been floated this and talking to several people that could afford to start a new insurance
program. Here's what I like to say. Can you imagine an insurance program that, you know, lowers your,
you know, your rates if you haven't had any interaction with a pharmaceutical product, actually starts
investing in the unvaccinated. I see a future where that's going to happen. This is all a part of
the discussions we're having behind the scenes with other medical entities. It's time to build a new
paradigm. And by the way, I think that insurance company will make so much more money than those
insurance companies that are going to, you know, charge you more for not being vaccinated. What
happens when they start watching an insurance company that their premiums are so cheap and they
never have to pay out because as it turns out, the unvaccinated individuals never go to
hospitals aren't dying, aren't getting sick, and they don't have to pay out.
I mean, I think it's a perfect.
If you're out there and you want to get a part of it, definitely reach into info at I Can Decide.
I'd love to see enough people to come together to start a new insurance program.
I think that is a great way that we can start changing this system.
Let's show the world.
And, of course, they'd be attacked, right?
You'd be attacked if you had an insurance program like that, but say, hey, it's our problem,
isn't it?
We're the ones betting on the unvaccinated.
We're going to bet and say they're the healthier people.
It's going to be cheaper and insure them.
go ahead and keep ensuring those they keep pumping them with fourth and fifth and sixth and seventh
boosters and see how that works out for you. Right. Exactly. And Del, our team, our team of
researchers, veteran researchers, doctors, they've been talking to us behind the scenes about this next
headline. It's super important. If anybody remembers one thing from this segment here, remember
this. Coming soon, climate lockdowns. This is in the hill. So a lot of people are saying, you know,
they're going to shift the COVID restriction policies and the apparatus that have been
built, they're going to just change lanes on that and bring it to the climate change agenda,
climate change narrative.
And so this appears to be, again, we're seeing these talking points all of a sudden enter
the media.
Check this out.
This is even in nature.
This is personal carbon allowances revisited.
So if anybody doesn't know what that is, personal carbon allowances was this idea to get in
people's every aspect of their life and tax them, surveil them, and restrict them for the amount of
carbon they're using, whether it's heating their house or driving their car, tax them by the
mile and so on and so forth. Listen to what this article says here in nature about this. And this
was after COVID. During the COVID-19 pandemic restrictions on individuals for the sake of public
health in forms of individual accountability and responsibility that were unthinkable only a year
ago or a year before have been adopted by millions of people. People may be more prepared to
accept the tracking and limitations related to personal carbon allowances to achieve a safer climate.
It goes on to say other lessons that could be drawn relate to the public acceptance in some
countries of additional surveillance and control in exchange for greater safety.
Oh, man, hold on a second. I'm going to have to, like a little truth moment here.
I'm going to tell the audience right now, this is one of the conversations has been going on
for the last several months. As I've told you before, we have an international body of
scientists and lawyers and specialists that we meet with every week to put this show together for you
to make sure that we've vetted it no matter where it is in the world we want to get it right.
But there are a couple of people out there on our team that have been saying, Dell, this entire
tracking system, the vaccine tracking system is just paving the way for what will ultimately be
a global warming tracking system. This is where it's going to go. It's going to go into climate
change. Mark our words right after this COVID pandemic. You're going to watch them start to want to
track you over your footprint in the environment.
Now I say this as someone, I'm still an environmentalist.
I grew up in Boulder, Colorado.
I want clean rivers.
I want clean air, but I'm not down with tracking human beings to achieve that.
And so I just got to put it out there for those of you on my team that have been trying
to get me to talk about this and I've been saying that's crazy talk.
How would they ever move a vaccine passport into a climate passport?
You win, I lose.
I owe you a dollar.
you know exactly who you are.
Right. And a lot of headlines, too, are saying that climate change is a greater public health
emergency than COVID ever was and things like that. So how would they get here? Well, there's a lot
of ways that they could possibly get there. And obviously, that vaccine passport was a big deal
that's still really going forward behind the scenes. But check this out. The WHO announced in
2021 that they were working on something. And this is what the headline looked like. World Health
Assembly agrees to launch process to develop historic global cord on pandemic.
prevention preparedness response. Well, that has now come to fruition and it's moving forward.
And this is what it looks like. It's called an international treaty on pandemic prevention and
preparedness. And I pulled a couple of the slides, some of the infographics from this.
And the WHO is leading this. Why is the WHO the right organization to lead this development of this
treaty? Because they did so well in the pandemic. It's 194 countries and they're going to be
having delegates from those countries that were WHO members.
countries. Remember, the WHO is funded primarily by the Gates, Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation
and China. So essentially they're saying the future of pandemic preparedness is going to be
shaped by those two. Well, the future of any illness or disease by which we just locked down the
world now. We're going to be controlled. I mean, this is really scary, you know, world order
type of stuff we're talking about. So what is their plan? How does this work? Yeah, so here's
another infographic. There's a handful of pieces to this. And so one of these here is they're talking
about a global inclusivity via a new legally binding agreement rooted in the WHO constitution.
They also, God. I mean, that's got to be interesting and scary for some people to read that coming
from the WHO. And then at the bottom here, it says a one health approach. So here we are wrapping that
climate agenda in here. It says a one health approach that connects the health of humans and
animals in the planet. So now the health of the planet is integrated into the pandemic response.
So this is really concerning. Now, it's supposed to meet on March 1st is their first committee meeting
to talk about this. By 2024, they're hoping to move forward on this. So this is just the start.
We'll be reporting on this every step of the way. Absolutely. And it just goes into the theme of our show
today, which is what is behind all this? Is this really, you know, are we against each other different nations,
bigger going on. And by the way, I personally want to make a shift today from now on. I do not
believe we should be referring to this as the World Health Organization any longer. It has clearly
become the World Health Order. So go ahead and make note. I think this is what we're dealing
with, and we should be very wary of our interactions with the World Health Order from now on.
Yeah. And here in the United States, it appears that the media has fully turned
turned on the CDC. We've covered headlines over the past couple weeks that really had us scratching
our heads and saying, wow, they're really going in on the CDC's data integrity, the fact that
they're not using science anymore, they've abandoned it. And so here's a recent headline that
came out. It's just, it's coffinails for the CDC. CDC is refusing to publish data as collected
on booster effectiveness for 33 million Americans age 18 to 49 over fears that might show the vaccine as
ineffective. They also are not publishing data on child hospitalization rates or comorbidities,
but it says here in the article, Kristen Nudlin, a spokesperson for the CDC said the agency has
been slow to release the different streams of data because basically at the end of the day,
it's not yet ready for prime time. Okay, well, let's just keep reading here. She also said
that they were reluctant to publish the data because it represents only 10% of the popular
in the United States, accounting for 33 million people.
The same sample size of CDC is used to track influenza for years.
And now, Del, hold on to your seat here.
This next quote may get you.
Outrage scientist stressed that publishing the data went hand in hand with educating
the public about vaccines.
Tell the truth, present the data, said Dr. Paul Offutt, a vaccine expert and advisor to the
Food and Drug Administration.
He's Dr. Paul Opit.
Roll the clip.
Dogs and cats living together.
Mass hysteria.
It's right.
When Paul Offitt's on your side, man, you know things are getting crazy.
Thank you, Dr. Paul Offutt, for stating the obvious.
It's nice every once in a while when you trip into our side of the fence here to say,
you know, a little transparency and honesty might go a long ways right now.
Amazing the obfuscation and the desire to hide the truth from the people.
You're getting it here.
We've been showing you all the data we can find.
Be nice to get the rest of it.
So how does this go?
Like, it's amazing mainstream media is now starting to report on this issue too.
Right.
And for anybody that thinks miracles don't happen, here we are.
And I'm about to read another sentence from Paul Offit, defending truth.
I have to believe that there is a way to explain these things so people can understand it.
He noted that because the CDC had not published the information American scientists were forced to rely on Israeli data.
We reported on that earlier.
You know, finally, here's another headline.
This is from another doctor that's been really outspoken during the past.
pandemic, Vinay Prasad. And he says here, how the CDC abandoned science. This is a wonderful article.
And I'll finish off with some of his quotes here. He says their research, this research is plagued
with classic errors and biases and does not support the press release conclusions that often
follow. In all cases, the papers are uniquely timed to further political goals and objectives.
As such, these papers appear more as propaganda than as science. The CDC's use of this technique has
severely damaged the reputation and helped lead to a growing divide in trust.
in science by political party. Science now risks entering a death spiral in which it will
increasingly fragment into subsidiary verticals of political parties. And perhaps the best person to
give the last word on this is former CDC director Robert Redfield. Listen to this recent interview
he had on Fox News. Okay. I do think, unfortunately, what you're seeing is sort of a politicalization
of how the data is presented. They've made a decision that vaccines are important. Vaccines are
the key to this pandemic. They're not the key. They're a piece. You know, we need obviously expanded
testing, expanded antivirals. So I think it's really misguided when selective data is presented
in order to advance a point of view. We should have much more rigorous debate, put all the
data out there, have enough respect for the American people that if you share the data,
you share the truth, you can make the arguments why, as I still believe, vaccines are an important
piece of our public health response. And I'm not afraid to present data.
that might show, you know, not the same benefit for hospitalizations and death in a different
group. I think it's very disappointing. And I think you're sort of seeing the politicalization
of how data is being used. I sure wish he would have spoken like that when he was at the CDC.
It seems like he was either clamped down or he's changed his tune. I don't know what.
But incredible issues right now, as we now watch mainstream media complaining about what the,
what the high wire has been complaining about since the beginning of this pandemic and really even before.
Jeffrey Jackson, incredible reporting, so much information there.
Thank you for all the great work you're doing. We'll see you next week.
Thank you, Del.
Now, I know a lot of things are flying through there. If you're brand new to this show, we use the highwire protocols, what we call it.
Transparency and media. We're demanding everyone else in media do the same thing as us, and this is what that is.
We provide you with every single document we are discussing here on the United.
this show. If you are not utilizing that tool, then you are not getting the best of what we're
offering for free. You don't even have to be one of the people contributing to the show. All you have
to do is on our website right now. Just go to thehighwire.com. It's probably where you're watching
this. You're on Rumble or somewhere else. Then go over the highwire.com and just sign up to our
newsletter. Just put your email in there. And then all of a sudden, every Monday, after a Thursday
show, you'll get every single one of these articles, all of these studies, even the video clips,
all links that you can go to them quickly, you can share them with friends.
You don't have to say, hey, this is what Del Bigtree said on the high wire.
You can say, here's what the CDC just admitted to.
Here's what the New York Times is talking about.
We put that in your hands.
It's amazing.
Now, really, I would really like to see more of you signing up this newsletter.
Do you see what's going on in Canada?
Do you see that this bank account's being frozen?
Do you see how crazy this world is?
There may be a moment, no matter where you are in the world or even here in the United States of America,
where we need to get an incredibly important piece of information out.
you yet they have shut down our website or something like that.
There will always be email.
We will always be able to tell you where to find us, where to get the important information,
should any crazy thing happens that tries to control our lives in a very draconian move.
So please, will you sign up to our newsletter so we always have contact with you no matter
how strange this world gets?
All right.
When I started the informed consent action network, it was right on the heels of having made
the film Vax, I toured the nation, really the world with that documentary that I think
changed the conversation around vaccine safety, especially around the MMR vaccine.
I wanted to get deeper into that investigation.
I wanted to start investigating all the vaccines.
And I knew that the only way I could do that is that I could figure out a way to penetrate
the legal blockade.
Everywhere I went, I was meeting with the biggest lawyers in the world.
I will not tell you who they are, many of them famous.
You've read about them for years saying, is there any way you could help me with this issue?
Because, and they would all say the same thing.
They would say, well, Del, as you well know, the 1986 Act protects vaccines.
There's no way to sue.
There's no way to get in there.
We can't get discovery.
There's no way to make money on it for those that were trying to, you know, do wrongful death cases and things like that.
And so we're not interested.
But I kept looking and I finally found a lawyer that had a different perspective.
And when we discussed it, we started saying, well,
Well, look, we may not be able to sue the manufacturer, but we could certainly sue the government of the United States that took on all that liability.
Of course, I'm talking about really one of the most important aspects of the informed consent action network.
That's our legal team, headed by Aaron Siri, who I think will go down in history as one of the greatest and most important constitutional attorneys in the world we've won against the CDC, the National Institute of Health, Health and Human Services, the FDA, cases revealing what they've been trying to hide.
There's our cases to date against the government.
There's a whole slew of cases that are private and civil in matters some going on right now.
Like I said, the one in D.C.
And behind all of that, as you well know, when you're donating to the informed consent action network,
nearly half of our budget is going into our legal work, which also includes all those FOIA requests,
the document dumps, Fauci's emails.
But I'm bringing that up because there's a particularly important moment going on right now.
It's not actually a case that we are the plaintiff on.
But Aaron's theory has been handling the case of the public health and medical professionals,
including Dr. Peter McCullough and many of the other doctors we've had on this show that want to see the Pfizer data.
And we've covered this extensively.
Many of articles that even hit the mainstream on this issue, the FDA, all regulatory agency, not Pfizer,
the FDA requested it first to have 55 years to process the FOIA request over vaccine data saying,
I mean, here they only took, you know, a few weeks to look at the data themselves to decide it was safe for all of us,
but we're going to need 55 years before we give it to the public.
This on the heels of our government saying, don't worry, we know we're using emergency use authorization.
We know this is, you know, experimental product.
We'll be totally transparent with you through the whole process.
Well, obviously, they didn't want to be.
And then it extended for 55 to 75 years.
Then we're hearing is going to be 75 years because there's even more pages than they realized.
Well, Aaron Siri took them to court on behalf of those.
medical doctors and won and basically forced that they were going to have to release that data
within one year. I think it's about 55,000 pages per month instead of the 500 they wanted to
release. And we reported just a couple of weeks ago here was paramount importance. Judge orders FDA
to hasten release of Pfizer vaccine docs rather than producing 500 pages a month. The FDA's proposed timeline,
he ordered the agency to turn over 55,000 a month. That means all the Pfizer vaccine data
should be public by the end of the summer rather than say the year, two, three years.
I had Aaron Siri on. He talked about the fact that they brought in Pfizer attorneys then. Then they basically said, get out of our way to the Department of Justice. Pfizer pushes to intervene in lawsuit seeking COVID vaccine information from FDA. I mean, do you see what Aaron's dealing with here? I mean, you, first of all, they admit basically we control the government. This is, yeah, well, it's the FDA until Pfizer gets pissed off. Now they bring in their attorneys. They tried to change it, try to get involved. Aaron Siri won again. So don't worry that data is coming out.
that's going to be here over the next year.
We're about to start seeing 55,000 pages a month.
And you may be asking yourself, what, you know, Dell?
I mean, what use are these things?
I mean, it's not like someone who's going to jail or something.
Well, I'll tell you what the use is.
It starts affecting the company itself.
And this is what we saw happen directly as I think in response to that.
Look at this article.
Pfizer quietly adds language warning that unfavorable preclinical
and clinical or safety data may impact business.
Now, as you should probably know,
if you own a large corporation that stockholders are investing in, if you have insider information
that lets you know our stock is about to crash, we kind of have to warden the stockholders
because they can't be left holding the bag when we had information they needed to have. So what
happened? They started rewriting all their documents. They called a special meeting to speak to their
stockholders. It was about the fourth quarter and full year 2021 earnings conference call
prepared remarks. This was February 8th, 2022. We got some.
some excerpts in the red lines.
You can see this is what was changed in their information,
phase four data for community and any other vaccine candidate
in the Beyond Tech program, Paxlobid,
or any other future COVID-19 treatment
in any of our studies in pediatrics, adolescents, or adults,
or real-world evidence, including the possibility
of unfavorable new pre-clinical, clinical, or safety data,
and further analysis of existing pre-clinical,
clinical or safety data adding,
or further information regarding the quality of pre-clinical.
or safety data, including by audit or inspection.
Guess what they expect is down the road for them?
Or further information regarding the quality of pre.
There it is again, they keep saying this concerns
about clinical data integrity.
Why?
Probably because they've committed fraud, it's just a guess.
But to get deeper into this, and I think to get a different perspective,
we say, well, how does this affect us?
Well, when it starts affecting the financial side of us,
How many times are we saying, well, it's greed, it's all about the money, they're all in for the money.
I tend to say that power is more important than money.
But if we're going to try and understand the events of the world right now, and especially this pandemic, perhaps it would be good to see it through the eyes of somebody that really looks at the financial movement and maybe to help us understand what it means that they're giving new warnings to the stockholders.
My next guest has worked for, I think it's the largest investment company in the entire world.
We're talking about Black Rock.
I think, what is it, $9 trillion they have in their work, which is shocking.
It's like bigger than most nations themselves.
I'm talking about Edward Dowd, who was a portfolio manager, an equity portfolio manager.
but just to get a sense of Black Rock and who he worked for,
this is an ad that's recently been put out by them.
Every great idea, every breakthrough,
started with a question.
Someone asked the why,
poked holes in the way things are to see what they could become.
And right now, the world is facing some big questions
about how to push forward without leaving people behind.
how to break with the past and create a better future.
So on behalf of more and more people, BlackRock is asking bigger questions, bolder questions,
questions that challenge convention and give rise to new thinking.
Questions like, how can valuing workers more increase a company's value
and how can the economy go green without putting communities in the red?
Because the bigger questions we ask, the bigger actions we can take.
Helping us tackle the biggest questions.
of them all.
How can we all prosper?
BlackRock, ask bigger questions.
I am speaking now with former equity portfolio manager for BlackRock, Edward Dow.
Edward, it's an honor to have you joining us today.
Thank you.
Thanks for having me, Dow.
Glad to be here.
Now, I am not going to get into conversations about Black Rock,
even though they seem to own or be a part of almost every element of the world that we
live in.
I'm sure you've signed every type of ND.
necessary. But what I do want to ask you is having, you know, your experience, having come up
through the financial system, obviously a career that got you into very powerful positions
and handling gigantic portfolios and finances, how would you say because of that, that's
shaped your perspective of the world different than somebody that maybe isn't involved in,
in sort of the financial side of the society we live in?
Yeah, that's a great question.
So I was a Black Rock for 10 years and managed a large-cap growth portfolio.
We grew the assets to $14 billion.
I left there in 2012, so I haven't been a Black Rock for a while.
And most of my former colleagues are gone as well.
I will say this, I've seen many frauds in my career.
I was a young Wall Street Investment Bank equity research analyst at Donaldson Luffin-Gen-Genrette.
I was an electric utility analyst.
I saw the dot-com fraud unfold before me.
Then I saw the housing fraud that went onto the bank's balance sheets.
And sure enough, the central banks and the government started getting involved in the money.
And the frauds moved on to central bank balance sheets and governance.
So it's a fraud writ large.
And so what I saw coming down the pike with this COVID stuff just started to make me very curious, very, you know, cynical, so to speak.
What were the first questions that you asked yourself, as you know, I always say that moment,
I'm watching, you know, videos out of China, people plunging face first.
We start hearing maybe there's a pandemic, maybe there's not.
Obviously, that's going to affect the markets.
What were the first questions you were asking yourself?
Well, prior to the COVID pandemic, many of us in the financial community had been wondering when
the big global debt party was going to end.
And we were trying to figure out what event would come in to usher that end.
And when COVID first hit, and I saw all the videos.
Quickly, when you say global debt party, I mean, that sort of language, I think,
I mean, to a layperson, what are you talking about when you talk about a global debt?
What are you referencing?
What debt are we talking about?
So, you know, after the great financial crisis, the response was to solve the debt problem
on the bank's balance sheets with more debt on government balance sheets and central bank balance
sheets that have been doing for the last 10 years credit creation money supply pump to paper over
the problems from the banks. And so the debt has grown so big that at some point the credit
system is at the end of its days here. So at some point, some country is going to default and it'll
set off the same chain of events that will spread like wild.
wildfire that the money authorities can't control. So those of us in the financial community for
years had been trying to figure out what that would look like. You know, we kind of speculated as we
do, you know, they'll have to provide cover for that because they can't take the blame for the
creation of the problem. So when COVID hit, I didn't immediately think that, although I was
suspicious. I, too, because I'm in the financial markets, I was super on top of the COVID in China
before anybody on the island of Maui was. So I was going to Costco about six weeks before anybody
even knew what COVID was. But as soon as the propaganda out of China started coming,
you know, you've got to realize something about China. Nothing comes out of China unless they wanted
to. So those viral videos going around and people dropping the streets look very,
stage production oriented. So many of us started to really question how deadly the virus was.
So my fear dissipated quickly. And then, you know, it came out later that the virus, 99.9% of us
survived. So that's when it clicked with me that something else was afoot.
As a guy that I'm sure deals with numbers, you probably understand how to read a graph.
When you were looking at the imperial model and these projected numbers of millions of people dying,
Were you immediately suspicious of that?
Or, you know, did you look into that at all?
You know, look, I saw the scare tactics they used.
And, you know, being on Wall Street, you know, garbage in, garbage out.
I mean, you can make up anything.
And, you know, so I'm a man who looks at data and I also look at real world experience.
And on the island of Maui, no one was getting COVID.
No one was dying.
And you know why that happened?
Because COVID was here in the fall of 2019.
Everyone got sick and we kind of got immunity.
People didn't start getting COVID again until, you know, wait for it,
2021.
Right.
So now let's look at the biggest part of the market side of this, which was a vaccine,
a promise of a vaccine, a warp speed vaccine.
What were your thoughts at the announcement that the only way we were going to get out
of this pandemic was a brand new vaccine?
that they hadn't even started manufacturing really yet.
What were your thoughts then?
Well, what really tipped me off that something was afoot was April 5th of 2020,
about three or four weeks after the country shut down,
James Bullard, the St. Louis Federal Reserve President,
got on face the nation.
And the question was asked,
how do we come out of this economy with all the fear
and people are not willing to go out.
And he said, oh, well, due to new technology,
we could have badges that determine someone's immunity.
Okay.
Wow.
And then the next question was, I didn't see the segment,
but the question was, okay, we'll come back
and we'll talk about the surveillance technology
that will be used to institute that.
Well, you know, those of us on Twitter that follow financial markets
raised a big stink and they buried that talking point for months and months and months.
But I saw, I just was so super curious as to why a Federal Reserve president would have such
a solution so quickly and talking about our health. Okay. And you're going to remember in the
summer of 2020 into the fall of 2020, if you talked about vaccine passports on social media,
you were called a conspiracy theorist. Yeah. Well, phone,
behold, you know, with the virus, it's 99.9% we all survived. They started to ratchet down
on our heads with these vaccine passports and mandates. I started to see what was going on.
And I, you know, you don't need to be a rocket scientist here.
Was this a product that you were excited about, the Pfizer or the Moderna or, you know,
AstraZeneca, Johnson & Johnson? I mean, you don't have to tell me you don't want to, but did you get in line
into this brand new technology that was going to save the world?
Absolutely not.
Why?
Well, I'll tell you, I only knew two things at the time.
It was Operation Warp Speed.
And Operation Warp, anything sounds like a disaster to me because things are run.
Owners are cut.
That's one.
Right.
Number two was, it was experimental.
Okay.
And with the technology that had never been used in vaccines before, this MRNA technology,
let's call it what it is.
gene therapy. Yeah. I said to myself, knowing this fact because I'm in the investment
world, it normally takes seven to ten years for safety data to be vetted on any vaccine that's
normally introduced. It takes years and years of clinical data and trials. So with that,
those two pieces of information, myself and a couple of my friends on Wall Street said,
we'll wait. And that's what we did. And you know, pretty quickly,
you know, April, June, July, April, May, June, July, the anecdotes started popping up.
And, you know, I'm not a statistician, but I know enough about stats to know that in a normal vaccine,
I should not be hearing any anecdotes about someone being injured or having an adverse reaction.
That should never happen. But we started hearing those that's what tipped off Steve Kersh,
who took the VACs. So those of us who understood math and probably,
were horrified at what we were hearing early on.
And it's gotten only worse since then,
and I've been doing a lot of work to show,
unfortunately, the real-world consequences
of this disaster.
Let's get into that.
I mean, you sort of predicted much of this
in tweets early on, you know, saying that this,
you were sort of afraid this was sort of,
I have an idea for a dystopian movie.
The background begins in 2020, a virus that mimics the flu,
sweeps across the globe.
Some believe it's a man-made bio-weapon
to provide cover for global economic
collapse from an unsustainable debt load and rising wealth inequality, the majority.
Believe their governments in dutifully obey orders to shelter in place while supply chains
dissolve. They lose jobs or small businesses. And eventually the middle class is wiped out
inexplicably large, big box businesses are allowed to operate and folks are allowed to shop
there. That's May 3rd, 2020. A lot of what you said there is really the big,
question I'm asking today on this show is we, you know, a lot of times I get into science,
but just looking at sort of the global events, it feels like there's something else
pulling the strings that maybe we don't see a gray matter, if you will, that seems to be
driving things that isn't showing up on the radar. What's going on in this catastrophe that's
got you the most worried? Well, I wrote that tweet in 2020 because I started to suspect that
the pandemic. I don't want to get into the debate of whether it was launched on purpose or they
use it as an excuse. Let's just assume that it's a convenient excuse to provide cover for a sovereign
debt crisis. So I thought like a criminal. Okay, that's why I was so able to accurately predict
what happened. If I was a criminal and I needed to cover up a sovereign debt crisis, I was
would introduce or take advantage of this virus to introduce a system of control to prevent
the riots when the sovereign debt crisis does unfold. And I would have a vaccine passport.
I would have digital identification. I would restrict travel. I would, you know, under the guise
of medical help and, let's call tyranny, I would be shut down riots and all sorts of things.
But, you know, that's what I would do.
And that's why I was so accurate in that.
And it looks, the thing that shocked me the most is the global coordination of all this.
Yeah.
When do global governments ever agree on anything?
But the talking points, the timing, the unified messaging suggests to me something else is afoot.
Now, can I prove that?
No, but I watch what people do and not what they say.
And, you know, this thing should have been over months ago.
And they keep actually turning the screws on our neck.
next, especially in Europe.
Yeah.
And now you've sort of publicly said that you believe fraud is taking place at Pfizer,
which is something, as I sort of led into with this,
the attorney we work with is also representing these medical doctors
that put FOIA requests forward demanding to see the Pfizer data from the trials.
They wanted that to take 75 years.
Aaron, Syria is one.
And now we're going to see that over a year.
We're seeing these warnings to the stockholders.
So financially, it looks like they're being affected.
But when you've been looking at it and you say you suspect fraud,
what are the things that sort of jumped out at you,
those milestones as you were looking at, as we have been,
any data we can find, what was it?
Because I know we come from sort of a medical perspective.
I'm a medical journalist from CBS,
but I've never looked at from a financial perspective.
What were the things that were jumping out at you
when you were looking at the data on the Pfizer vaccine?
Well, you know, a couple things happened last year that really made me go public in a very
vocal way on Twitter.
And the number one thing was when the FDA inexplicably said that they were going to release
the data in 75 years, I immediately said that's proof of a cover-up, that's fraud on its face,
prima facie evidence.
We've never seen this before from the FDA hiding something for 70s.
So as an investor, I can go out onto Twitter and say publicly, I have an investment thesis.
This is fraud.
Show me the data.
Okay.
Then maybe I'm not right.
But since I've gone public and gotten more notoriety, I went on Steve Bannon's show.
And I said, be a lightning ride.
And lo and behold, people have been reaching out to me.
Wall Street, former insurance, sell side analyst, Brooke Jackson.
And I did a podcast with Brooke Jackson.
And I talked to her for three hours.
And I'm, in my opinion, I'm 100% convinced it's fraud.
The data was garbage.
And for people that don't know who Brooke Jackson is, just very quickly, that story.
Yeah, Brooke Jackson was the Ventavia whistleblower who came out in November,
and she talked to the British Medical Journal, which is a very well-established journal.
She gave them all the receipts.
They have all the receipts.
And that story unfortunately kind of disappeared because the fact checkers and the manipulators of the perceptors.
tried to bury it and even the BMJ was horrified that they were fact-checked. This is a
well-respected journal. He kind of faded out of the limelight for a little bit, but when she
heard me use the word fraud, she said, you're the first person I've heard say that. So she contacted me.
We talked for three hours. And as someone who, you know, analyzes the story, there was a lot of fraud.
There was so much fraud. It actually overwhelms you when you, overwhelms you when you listen to it.
But I focused in on one thing that really struck home to me.
And that was that she oversaw a thousand patients out of the 44,000 clinical trial data.
Okay.
And she said that the study was unblinded.
And what that means is bias is introduced and in normal and even by Pfizer's own protocols, that data should be thrown out.
Okay?
It wasn't.
It was rolled up into all the data.
She tried to warn the FDA about this, and within six hours of warning the FDA, she was fired six hours later.
I mean, you can't make this up.
And then she was contacted by a Pfizer attorney who turns out to have a swamp creature background, Mark Barnes.
I mean, this is like one of those horror movies where you run to the police officer to save you,
and you find out the police officer works for the very people you're running from.
She goes to the government, the FDA.
That's supposed to be the watchdog agency, making sure proper science is being done.
I work for Octavia, which is not Pfizer, but a company hired to do these trials.
They unblinded it illegally.
This is supposed to be a double-blind study.
That means the evidence has been contaminated.
I need to let you know.
And instead of them saying, great, apparently she gets fired just six hours later.
So they obviously went back to her bosses and Pfizer probably, which is really,
really a terrifying development. Right. And you know, some of the people who wanted to poo-poo her
story said, well, it's only a thousand patients. It's not a big deal. Well, first of all, I don't care.
They were wrapped up into the 44,000. But the way the math works, if you look at the trial
that they calculated the efficacy on, the actual 95% lie efficacy, which is already been proven
it's a lie.
Right.
But they said in the vaccine group, there were eight people.
And by the way, it was only a 28-day study, another ridiculous thing.
So in those 28 days, eight of the vaccine group got COVID.
164 of the placebo group got COVID.
So that's how they calculated the number.
Well, if it's an unblinded study and biases introduced,
all you have to do is take 75 of those 1,000 in her, just her group alone,
and move it over to the vaccine group,
that's a 50% efficacy, all 164,
it's zero percent efficacy.
And, you know, look, where there's smoke, there's fire.
They covered up her site, they fired her.
If you don't think other sites were doing this,
you know, I get another, you know,
I'll sell you, you know, like selling ice to an Eskimo.
So do you think those things are going to,
as they have to release this data,
what are you expecting or what are you thinking
we're going to see. I mean, obviously, we have a product that didn't come anywhere near 95%.
Now that we have the benefit of having giving it to hundreds of millions of people around the
world, efficacy dropping within weeks after first shot, weeks after a second shot, third shot seems
useless, fourth shot being used in Israel. Do you think we're going to see evidence of this
inside of that control that we haven't seen? Absolutely, unless they redact everything. But I think
the data is going to look ridiculous, number one. Number two, you know, someone, because of my
notoriety, a lot of smart scientists have been talking to me and people from the regulatory
that, you know, work for pharmaceutical companies guiding people through the FDA regulatory
process. And someone pointed out to me, there's probably a crime that's been committed by the
FDA. And that's what they call bemo audits.
B-I-M-O. After a clinical trial, you're supposed to go in and actually do an audit on some random sites of the actual records, the electronic records,
sure that they didn't just make up the data.
Right.
This fact, they didn't even do those audits, and that can be proven.
That's fraud on the government's part as well.
And, you know, look, the hiding of the data suggests something really went wrong, and there's what I call institutional imperative wholesale corruption.
at the FDA that just happened over time.
Do you think this is leading to sort of hiding vaccine deaths, things like that?
I mean, is it, and what happens if our government is involved in literally hiding
what would essentially be murder if it's known and not being disclosed to people taking
the product?
Well, that's part of the problem, right?
So the government's in on it, who's going to come save us?
And, you know, look, the evidence is coming at this point.
I don't know if you saw the story out of Germany yesterday.
I mean, it was quite shocked.
Well, you brought that to our attention as we were
just reaching out to you to bring you on. So go ahead and break it because I think this is gigantic.
Tell us what this story is. But bottom line is, you know, this is a global fraud. It doesn't just
reside in the U.S. So a German health care insurance company went public yesterday and said that
basically the government is underreporting the number of vaccine side effects. Forget deaths.
They're not talking about deaths, just side effect. And they, you know, ran the numbers on
a huge amount of their own people, and they came up with an underreporting factor of 10 times.
So they think there's actually 10 times more of the side effects that the government is
letting people believe. And they said, we had to release this, because normally, you know,
you would keep this data to yourself and just do some pricing, but because it's so ridiculous,
they said we had to release this to the public because it's the ethical thing to do.
Okay?
My understanding is it's about roughly 10 or 11 million people in their insurance program and something over 250,000.
They ran codes, right?
ICD codes looking at what types of things are the people we're paying for.
What are they claiming or what are they going to the hospital for?
And they found, you know, hundreds of thousands of them were getting codes for vaccine injury.
And this is all brought, you brought this to our attention yesterday.
I'm just sort of for the people that are just now hearing about this.
That's gigantic.
And what they basically said, we're talking.
If that's just in our insurance group, then our government is looking at millions of people
being injured by this vaccine.
Somebody better do something about this.
These numbers are off the hook.
Let me put some numbers there.
They imputed just by their own sample that in Germany, it's two and a half to three million side-effect injuries.
or complaints.
Wow.
Okay.
That's three, that's, that's, Germany's got 83 million people.
That's 3.6% of the population.
Wow.
So, so, and, you know, that doesn't account for the people who didn't report side effects, didn't
go to the doctor, but just kind of-
Or haven't had a side effect yet.
Right.
Right.
And they, you know, so if you do that math, that's one in 25 people in Germany had a adverse reaction.
One in 25.
No drugs.
ever been approved on that nonsense before.
Is it possible? I mean, when I heard this, my first thought was these insurance companies
have got to be asking themselves. And as this is coming out, I have to think insurance,
because we'll probably talk about it too, but we saw the insurance companies up in Indiana
reporting 40% rise in deaths between 18 to, there is, rise in non-COVID 19 death, hits
life insurers. I think it was 18 to 49. Life insurers think that. Think
the deferral of medical treatment during the pandemic contributed to an increase in death benefit claims,
not directly tied to COVID-19. Whatever they're guessing, he said a 40% rise in deaths, which is just astronomical.
But here we're talking about in Germany, they're just saying, hey, these are just injuries.
We're talking millions of them. But is it possible that an insurance company coming forward like that could set off a wildfire?
Because I have to imagine these insurance companies say, wait, hold on a second.
We're not going to pay for an injury that a mandated product by our government did to the people that we're covering.
Why should that be our responsibility?
Is it possible that we could see insurers, you know, insurance companies suing governments for a defective product that is, you know, creating billions of dollars in costs?
The legal ramifications are just mind-boggling at this point.
But the most important thing that the German insurance company did is,
they gave cover to other insurance companies to talk about this because I in the you know
the first week of February a lot of US insurance companies reported they didn't say
it was it was the jabs but they started introducing a new category called indirect
COVID death whatever that means and you know the numbers are the numbers the numbers
accelerated in the second half of 2021 with the introduction of a so-called miracle
vaccine and we saw from a number of companies that spoke to this an increase a faster death rate
amongst the younger people in the cohort than the older people okay what do we know about what happened
in the second half of uh 2021 mandates for kids and young people yeah well this is 18 to 64 but
let's just talk about they're all people that work um these are group life policies that i analyzed
so what do we know that happened mandates and boosters started hitting
Okay?
It makes no sense why younger people would be dying due to deferred treatment.
These are healthy working age adults.
And those are the numbers.
Here's a tweet.
Let me just read this out.
Summation of major insurance company corporate groups policy loss ratios,
death claims over Q4, fourth quarter rate versus 2019 rates.
Unum is plus 36% in their death claims, plus 57% at Lincoln, plus 41%.
I mean, this is a science fiction.
movie happening right here. These are astronomical rises in deaths that are taking place.
And, you know, the One America Insurance, Mr. Davidson, he put some meat on the bones.
He said a 10% rise in mortality would be a three standard deviation event, which in stats world
is big deal. He said 40% rise was a once in a 200-year flood. And what people need to understand about
the insurance industry is these actuaries, they know how to predict the death rates because
they're very steady. These death rates don't wildly fluctuate unless there's something else going on.
And there's deathly something else going on. And it's, you know, it's something we've never seen.
And it's becoming unavoidable at this point as to what the reason is. Obviously, I believe it's the
Jabs. And, you know, we can talk about funeral homes, too. They've had some interesting results.
with funeral homes. All right, you got this. Like, there's another tree. Funeral homes. A picture is worth
a thousand words from SCI 10K. Notice the acceleration in stock returns starting in 2021,
and peer groups were up more than plus 40%. So these are funeral homes are on the rise,
stocks, you know, catapulting. So what does this say from, I mean, this is just finances. People
say, well, what does that have to do with debts? But for someone like you, what does this mean?
Well, so if you look at the stock returns in 2020, they weren't that great.
That was, you know, when, you know, everybody was dropping like flies back then.
Yeah.
Okay.
Then we have a vaccine, a miracle vaccine, and the stock price appreciation accelerates,
as did some of the results from these companies.
And I have carriage services just reported today.
And I'm not on the conference call because I'm with you Dell, but I would have been.
But let me just tell you what I saw.
Revenue is up 14% year over year.
Same store sales up 9% year over year.
You know, we saw the, also, if you go on in the next slide,
we saw that basically there was an acceleration in the summer
because these guys give monthly results.
And we saw an acceleration into the summer,
both year over year and sequentially.
Then there was a dip off in November, December.
But guess what?
results are accelerating again into December and into January.
They actually provided January data.
And the numbers are plus 9% sequential growth from November and plus 15% sequential growth
from December and January.
Okay.
What's going on?
This is, you know, and there, and you know, the authorities are saying to us,
hey, the pandemic's ending.
Well, riddle me this.
Why are funeral homes accelerating into January?
Now, these are public funeral homes that only represent about 10% of the market.
90% of the market is private.
So we're just getting a glimpse into this.
Incredible.
What is so, to sort of sum it all up, your perspective right now as you look at this,
the future of the U.S. and then the global view of the world in the face,
because for the first time ever, this is an event.
vaccine that was just given in this country or selectively, all around the world was a mandate for this
vaccine that I'm with you to me unless, I mean, I don't know, did some poison just get released
from the earth or is there an alien group, you know, hitting us with photon rays? What is going on?
I'm kind of like down with Occam's Razor, you know, the simplest answer is usually the one that's
true. What is the one thing that changed on this planet, a mandated experimental vaccine that now
Pfizer is warning its stockholders, look out.
We have some problems on the horizon as people start to see what we actually made here.
What happens?
What is your sort of worst case scenario right now that you're embracing or thinking about?
So I'm sure this on Steve Bannon show and other shows.
So here's the problem.
Unlike other frauds where the regulators step in and, you know, are the watchdogs.
The watchdogs are in on it this time.
Okay.
The government's in on it.
Whether they were dupes or they are criminals, you know, we can sort that out later, but
they're in on it.
So they're going to do a cover-up.
And I'm calling for this thing to be pulled immediately and stopped.
We need adults in Washington to step forward.
Evidence is undeniable at this point.
Now absent that, they're going to, you know, look, think like a criminal.
What does a criminal do that's caught?
Because they are caught.
There's enough of us that know this.
And the word spreading Wall Street is getting skittish.
They're listening to me and they're starting to get out of these stocks because they, you know, they don't want to lose money.
And also, I think a lot of people were, a lot of investors on Wall Street would do, they took these jabs.
They thought this was the greatest thing since sliced bread.
And, you know, people are dying and the funeral homes are filling up.
So what I suspect is they're going to triple down.
And, you know, I find it very curious that this German insurer talks yesterday and all of a sudden, you know, we're at war in Ukraine and no one really even cares.
I know no one in this country that cares about Ukraine.
No one.
So globally, this, you know, will this cover-up have been a success?
I mean, you know, I've talked to other people that say that, you know, we are pension funds.
I mean, tell me about pension funds and where pension funds are at and what that plays into this conversation.
Well, so pension funds are underfunded across the globe.
Let's just talk to the globe.
So, you know, this is a philosophical thing because of the debt that all the countries have acquired in the form of just the debt plus the unfunded liabilities and all these pensions.
Europe has a different pension system than the U.S., so they actually have more obligations than we do.
Social Security is de minimis compared to Europe.
This is a philosophical question, and I can't prove this, but let's play the game.
You know, since the creation of the Federal Reserve, it's been viewed mostly by capitalism that you want to extract a unit of profit from a human.
It's always been beneficial to extract profit from a human.
Let's suppose the map is flipped, and the system writ large, not a bunch of people in a room smoking a cigar, but the system sees it's more profitable to kill a human because of the unfunded liabilities.
I just throw that out there.
I think it's something we need to think about.
I can't prove any of it, but maybe the math is split.
I mean, and I, too, I'm not a conspiracy theorist, but I think we're allowed to ask the question.
We have a disease that seemed to only affect those in the pension class, as I call it.
And every drug that seemed like it could cure them or help them either prevented or save them in a hospital was denied, made it illegal.
And we tell them, go home, wait to your lips, turn blue, bring you in, put you on remdesivir, which is a drug that can shut down your kidneys, put you on a ventilator where you have.
about a 9 and 10 chance of dying.
It seems to me when we look at who was really vulnerable, both from this disease and from
the hospital treatment here in America and around the world, it's those over the age of about
70 with other comorbidities.
All those people that I would assume are really big in this pension class.
And so, you know, we certainly have to ask the question.
It is incredibly convenient that that is the generation that is being white.
wiped out both by this virus and by our response to the virus.
You know, are we, and when you look at Russia, are you worried at all about just total chaos
and potentially a world war or a civil war here in America?
Do your thoughts go to those places?
Well, my thoughts on Russia is this is Kabuki Theater.
I'm not worried about a nuclear war because, you know, everyone dies.
I think this is a big distraction and they want to fill the headlines up with this as the bodies pile up across the country and the globe.
But what I do worry about is as the news of this spreads and it's spreading, more and more people are going to become super distressed, agitated, and angry.
And, you know, they're going to demand from their, hopefully they demand from their politicians to act and start asking questions.
If they don't act, I'm fearful that, you know, we're going to see what happened in Canada,
happen here, which is people go to Washington, D.C., to protest,
and then the authorities get kinetic on us rather than we're kinetic on them.
So I view chaos and insanity over the next several years, or not several years, several months, sorry.
So it's just, just, you know,
know, don't get too fearful about this. It's out of our control, but I mean, there's no one
coming to rescue us except ourselves, and everybody needs to get involved. And, you know,
my clarion call to Wall Street is you've been jabbed, you own some fraudulent stocks, get out of
them. My goal is hopefully that, you know, red stocks and declining stocks can wake up the marginal
line. And my goal is to save as many people as possible. And through individual conversations
and just pointing out what's going on on Wall Street
because the mainstream media is an accomplice in murder at this point,
in my humble opinion.
Full stop.
I couldn't agree with you more.
Where do you find hope?
I find hope in that I've been very involved in the anti-mandate movement here,
and I've come to realize the people I thought be standing shoulder to shoulder with me,
you know, I wouldn't have anything in common with them.
But, you know, this is, you know, we're finding each other.
I'm finding people all across the globe.
And it's created a great community.
And it's taught me and others that this isn't about the blue team, the red team, the vegans, the, you know, the carnivores, the black, the white, the Hispanic.
We're team humanity.
And the group of people that are with me is diverse as, you know, can be.
And, you know, this is, this is a beautiful thing because we love.
freedom and we love individual liberty and we don't like people telling us what to do with our
bodies. And so my hope is we're all finding each other and more and more people are waking up.
And there is this great awakening to the, you know, the 30, 40 year war con that we've been
seeing. And this Ukraine nonsense is just another, you know, example of it. And the fact that it's so
not favored by the American people says to me, the hope is people are catching on more so than we would
said. Edward Dowd, thank you. We are finding each other. Thank you for, you know, being out there.
We were able to find you on short notice deciding to speak to our audience. You are a busy man,
rightfully so. You're looking at this in a very clear way. Your voice is so important. So I want to
thank you for being courageous, for being a hero, and for taking the time to join us when you
could have been on a very interesting meeting online. So thank you.
And best of luck.
I hope you'll stay in touch as we sort of continue to track these issues around the world.
Del, thank you for your bravery and your team's bravery.
I mean, this is, we need you.
We need everybody to stand up.
This isn't, you know, just everybody needs to get involved in any way you can.
So I really appreciate people like you to get this message out.
And people are listening.
And, you know, I'm into predicting things.
I'm going to make a call.
You guys are the mainstream media now.
They're done.
They're dead.
It's over.
Fantastic.
I'm with you on that.
How do people follow the work that you're doing?
You're putting out some great tweets.
Just go ahead and what's the best way to track your work?
On Twitter for now, at Dowd-Eadward, D-O-W-D, Edward,
and on Getter at Edward Dowd-D-D-O-W-D.
I dump all my research on there with some commentary and predictions
about what I'm seeing and what's happening.
Fantastic, Edward.
Have a great day.
Thank you for your time.
Take care.
You too. Take care.
Well, I mean, I think as you see, and I've said this before, I'm really deep in the sort of the vaccine and drug space.
It's something I understand after working in the doctors.
But you get deep enough in a rabbit hole and you find yourself with other people in rabbit holes, whether it's finance or it's, you know, big tech, big oil, whatever it is, even the FCC and 5G or airplanes, wherever you go and follow the corruption, it always seems to be the same story.
And so that's why I think it's fantastic to get that point of view from the financial interest.
Again, all this started because I was talking about the Aaron Siri lawsuit wins or driving Pfizer to warn their own stockholders, folks.
The wheels are coming off this thing.
If you ever asked yourself before, you need to just stop wondering and start patting yourself on the back and say, we did it.
We brought this thing down.
We brought the truth.
We held the line.
continue to bring it forward. You've been sharing the high wire. We've been growing. There's other great
bloggers and people out there. We are the new mainstream media. You have made that possible,
but it's not going away. If you do not see the writing on the wall, we have won a battle. This is a
huge battle. I think Pfizer, Moderna, I really think these companies are going down. I do think
you will probably see insurance companies starting to sue governments and then what the heck is that
going to look like. But all of that reporting, we will.
want to do that. We want to have reporters on the ground there. We want to be able to do that.
We want to be able to broadcast live wherever we're at. All of that takes equipment. All that
takes time. And we want more lawsuits, more and more, as they try to force laws in California
with 12-year-olds being able to decide what stockholders are only now finding out about at Pfizer.
This is insanity. It must be stopped. We need your help. So please, if you're out there and you've
been watching this show, you say, man, every single week I get my mind blown.
Yet my money is going to CNN and Fox as their ratings are dropping.
Why don't you go ahead and shift out of that and start helping us because we're the ones that are on the front lines doing the work.
We don't work for anybody.
We work for you.
Just go and donate to ICANN.
It's right here on the website.
Just click on the donate button, fill out the information.
Become a recurring donor.
Just think of us as any other membership of all those you have, book clubs and gyms.
This is where you're getting your truth.
You're also getting to fund some of the most important.
important lawsuits of our time. Even $1 a month makes a difference if that's all you can afford.
But wherever you're at, whether it's just give up on one Friday night dinner and put that
funding once a month towards ICANN, it really is making a difference. It's making it possible.
It's also allowing us to make calls the guys like Edward Dowd, you know, just hours ago,
literally in the afternoon yesterday and have them say, yeah, look, I see what you're doing.
It's quality. I will go ahead and appear on that. You've seen.
some of the best people in the world,
biggest scientist coming onto the high wire.
I have you to thank for that.
When we started out,
when we were just in the closet in Hollywood,
I never believed that that would be possible.
Yet now the biggest minds and thought leaders
around the world are coming here.
Please become a part of that,
feel what it feels like to be a part of making that difference.
Lastly, as we look at the environment around the world,
there's so much tension, so much rhetoric from governments.
We have Homeland Security threatening to call people terrorists that spread even malinformation,
this new term, get ready for, malinformation, meaning information that's true, but is being used
to undermine your confidence in the government, as though anyone needs any help with that right now.
But because of that, it's so extremely important that we stress the peaceful side of this movement.
I want to be perfectly clear to everyone in my audience.
I believe peace is the way forward, that we walk in peace, we stand in peace no matter if we're hit by batons by police officers throughout time.
It's the Martin Luther Kings.
It's the Gondis that really changed the world.
They didn't use violence.
This is not a violent movement.
It never will be, and I know I'm in agreement with all of the other reporters out there and the leaders out there that are standing in front and leading us in this movement.
but I want to make that clear
and there was a video that came out
that I thought was so important
I didn't want to let it pass by
sure we can drive our trucks
and we can have convoys
but we can't allow the languaging
to be put on us
we've got to lead with who we are
and I just think that was done best
by Kyle Sechik this week
just take a look at this beautiful video
put out
this message is for the president
of the United States of America
my name is Kyle Sechik of the Freedom Convoyser
Freedom Convo, USA 2022, and our routes meet here in D.C. on March 1st in time for your state of the union address.
We are very organized, and our routes are public. I even pulled a permit for the National Mall to be respectful.
I just want to be as transparent as possible from the start so there's no confusion. We are coming peacefully,
and we're going to do this lawfully and constitutionally. I want the rest of the world to know our plans
so that there's no twisting and lying about who and what we are. I'm coming to you as a father,
a small business owner who's unaffiliated to any parties.
We just want government overreach to end.
On behalf of Freedom Convoy USA 2020,
we are asking you to end the state of emergency,
end the mandates once and for all.
Sir, the world is watching us
because they know that if what's happening in Canada
happens to us here in the land of the free,
then freedom as we know it is gone.
So we are leaving the choice to you.
The decision is in your,
your hands, this whole convoy, this whole assembly on the National Mall, it doesn't even have to
happen if you just end things now and we can get on with our lives.
To you, other convoys that plan on meeting us here, we look forward to seeing you and joining
with you.
We're going to do this right.
We're going to do this honorably.
Mr. President, we have no other motives in this mission.
You see, the government, our elected officials of both parties have failed us tremendously these
last two years and now it's time for us, we, the people, to fix this, to end this.
We're ready to get back to our lives, the ones promised and guaranteed in the United States
Constitution, Bill of Rights, and the contract that you signed and swore an oath to under the one
true God. This is simple. End this. Now by Kyle Seppch, who is the organizer of the Freedom Convoy
USA. Kyle, what inspired you to put out that video? We've been watching convoys. I haven't seen
anybody really make an address like that. It was so eloquent and powerful. What was the
inspiration? Well, a couple of inspirations. One being, we know how media and government are
going to want to twist this regardless. So if we do this the right way and get this message out before
and then people can start following the entire thing, the truth is out there from start to finish.
so there is no twisting and lying in any part of this.
And as you guys have been saying, you know, with the other guest you have on your show,
of course we know that's coming.
That's just, it's going to happen.
But truth is always revealed in the end.
So we want to be as clear as day.
And like you heard me saying that, our routes are as clear as possible.
We're doing everything correctly.
I just got out of a two-hour meeting with Capitol Police, with the Metropolitan Police,
with the National Park Service, with United States Park Police.
I mean, it's 13 different people in a meeting.
And I'm just telling you guys straight from the source of who's, you know, pulling this permit and doing all this organizing.
This is what it is.
Yeah.
Now, just hours after you made that announcement, we saw this headline coming out of the Pentagon approves request for National Guard as Trucker Convoy Eyes, D.C.
Do you feel like this is the beginning of a narrative or do you think that this is just an important step that they need to take?
I mean, how does that here you give this peaceful message in just moments later, it's like bringing this.
the National Guard. Am I looking at the wrong way? I mean, we understand. I mean, I've been
planning this for a month with my teammates, you know, out of California, Florida, Maryland. We've been
all, you know, we weighed the risk. We knew what was going to happen with all this. That's not
the only news article we've seen. We've seen all kinds of things that are totally opposite of what
we really have planned. But once again, I'm telling you, I am working directly with D.C.
All these different, all these different police departments and parks, so that we do it right. So while
other people post all this, let's be honest, crap and lies.
Yeah.
We're going to keep doing what we're doing and updating people along the process.
So everybody knows that we're trying to do this peacefully.
I'm sorry, not trying to do this peacefully.
We are doing this peacefully.
Yeah.
Longfully, constitutionally.
And yeah, man, and I, you know, you said in the beginning of the show,
hey, man, what kind of got you personally into it?
I own a gym, man, in Maryland.
There's now two gyms I own.
But one of them, at the beginning of this in March of 2020,
I had state and county officials and health departments come to my place of business that I own and tell me you may not be open.
Your place of work that you use, Kyle, that you provide for your children to survive literally, you may not be open.
And this was a huge red flag to me alone.
And so I started getting into the Constitution and I'll get there in a second.
I'm still open today.
I want to make that very clear.
Never closed.
And it's funny because as soon as I started, I told them no.
They were like, hey, Kyle, you know what?
Okay, okay, we don't want to go to court about this.
So let's, if you can, please be six feet apart in your gym and everybody has to wear masks.
Bro, I'm a fighting facility.
We grapple every day.
We spar every day.
And I said, respectively, I should have sent you guys the video.
I said, respectively, I'm not going to do that.
So you guys, you know, whatever you have to do, do it.
They never pursued me.
I never had to pay fines, never had to go to court because they knew that I would win that case.
And then that would set president for the local and state, if not federal.
other gyms and stuff like that.
And then I have two boys that are four and six.
The school systems are making these kids wear masks.
They tried to tell me at the beginning of the school year.
I was in Montgomery County, Maryland.
So I moved my family.
Literally, I moved locations where I live.
And I went to another county in Maryland that still had mask optional.
But within two weeks, the state basically bribed this county and said,
listen, we're not going to give you the funds for this and this and this unless you make
these kids wear masks.
What did I do?
I pulled my kids out.
I've been homeschooling them ever since.
But I want to make something very clear
because I know people are listening
from all over the state.
There's kids in Maryland,
they still have to wear masks in schools
in public schools.
They're wearing them.
Every single kid in public schools in Maryland
is still wearing masks.
And you've seen the school,
you've seen these other schools open up.
Why are kids still wearing masks?
Yeah, it's a crime.
It's a crime against their psyche.
God knows what that generation
ends up becoming, you know,
what is it doing?
to their empathy, their ability to communicate,
babies that have never seen a smiling face.
And what happens to these kids
that that's all they knew
and suddenly you try to take that mask away?
It's going to be a terrifying experience.
I mean, it's just really incredible.
Just some final words.
Thinking about the Constitution,
thinking about what the United States represents,
the world will be watching this convoy
as it crosses America.
What is your hope and what is your message to the world?
Yeah, so, guys, we know most of the United States.
of you are with us and what we're doing. You guys know what we're doing. And the guy, and Edward
before this told you, hey, you guys are the mainstream media now in a good way. People are going
to the truth now. The truth is getting out there more and more every day and that's what we're
happening. Praise God that more and more people eyes are opening. And that's really a big part of this
mission. Yes, we want to end the mandates. Yes, we want to end the state of emergency. Yes,
we want to support our people in Canada with everything they went through. But it's also,
we want to get attention so that more people understand what's truly going on. It can see how many people
in America are really behind this because it hasn't happened yet.
Even at the defeat the mandates walk that we did two weeks ago, it wasn't this big, huge crowd.
It was like, you know, 15,000 people, right?
I mean, okay, but come on, how many people are in America?
So it's like, for this is our opportunity in the most peaceful way, man, in the most peaceful way
to get attention to show really how many people in the United States are behind this and want to
end this.
And it's going to be public.
People are really truthfully going to see it.
And there's not just our cowboy.
There's other convoys meeting us there that have reached out to us and said, hey, Kyle, we'll be there.
We'll see you, blah, blah, blah, March 1st on the National Mall because they know that I'm the only one with the permit request in that has been doing this right.
And they want to be involved with that as well.
They don't want, nobody wants to cause any problems with this.
This is going to be peaceful and lawful.
And I'm going to make sure that this is done right so that when government or whatever other people try to, let's be honest, infiltrate or mess up what we're doing, we know those are our people.
And at the very end, let's say for some reason, even me put my face out there, let's be honest, there is a risk of them trying to use me as an example.
It could be arresting.
It could be ruining my reputation.
It can be taken away my businesses.
I know these risks are coming, but here's the thing.
I know really what we're doing, and it's the truth.
And in the end, that's going to be spread and known.
So this is why I come to you calm and in peace, because I know what we have put together.
And if people want to stay involved and see really what we're doing, please go to our channels as well, other than the ones.
wire here for the high wire here. Please stay involved with us because you're going to get it straight from the source. We're not twisting, ma'am. A small business. Tell me about that. Where we want to follow you? Where, where, you know, where do we follow what you're doing? How do we stay track, you know, the convoy? What's going on? So if you go to, there's all kind of social media sites we have, but we just, we have a website up now that's official freedom convoy USA 2020. And that has all of our different, you know, places to watch us, Instagram, Instagram, Discord, Facebook. So you just look up Freedom Convo, USA, 2020.
And you'll see how organized and legit we are.
We even have teams to respond to you if you wonder about or where you can hang banners over the
And give out water and food and help with gas and that's another thing. Yes, we are getting donations, but I want to make something very clear
We're not saying, hey, let's please donate to us, blah, blah, if you want to help find a trucker that is coming
It's not just truckers find somebody who's in a motorcycle club that's coming or a mom that's bringing a van and
Bring us some friends with her whoever and donate to them, you know, I just want to make that very clear because my nonprofit is behind this, but
But it's not like, I don't, you know how the media and you know how government's going to want to twist this.
And I'm just making everything out and open from the start.
If you truly want to be part of this, share the word about what we're truly doing and support the people that you know that are coming because this is it.
This is we the people.
This is going to be our biggest stand yet.
And this is the thing that makes history and truly makes changes in the United States of America.
Fantastic.
Kyle Septic, I think we're all just sort of relieved to hear that, you know, at least one of the convoys, there's several.
that you are as passionate,
as beautiful.
It's so funny, you know what,
you're reminding me of Nick Coton,
another MMA fighter,
you yourself, an MMA fighter,
and so many of them that I communicate with.
You care about your bodies.
I think that's probably what sort of brings you
into this arena more than, you know,
at a higher percentage rate
than most other professions.
But I'm always amazed at the passion
and the love and the empathy and compassion
of you guys.
It seemed like killers in the rings,
but when it comes down to fighting for what's right,
You really know how to do it.
So beautiful, so peaceful.
Your video was amazing.
And I just wanted thank you for taking the time and energy
to put your face in front of this.
And we will certainly be with you,
both in spirit and prayers
and standing with you out there in Washington, D.C.
Yeah, if I can say one more thing, man.
Just, you know, something that's really helped me
throughout the last two years, big time.
It's just a reminder to all the audience that you have.
get in the word, get in the Bible,
and get in the Constitution, know your rights,
your God-given rights.
The reason we're at where we're at
in the United States right now
so many people got away from the Constitution,
the United States Constitution,
and each state you have your own Constitution.
Make sure you guys know this thing,
get in the word, you know,
our country's founded under the one true God.
Let's get God back in the government,
back in our lives. Thank you very much.
I love it. Kyle Sefchik,
we will check in with you further down the road.
Good luck out there,
and thank you once again
for taking the time to share
with us today. Thank you, Dale. All right. Well, just amazing to see this movement growing and blossoming new
flowers and leaves and branches as we grow in this country around the world. Huge events happening
in Austria and Canada still standing up there, marching, standing for what's right here in America.
And of course, I know you're all waiting for it. I'm pretty sure by next week we'll be able to
announce our event in California, but we really did want to get out of the way. I do not like
seeing divided, you know, rallies and this against each other right now. We have a convoy heading to
Washington, D.C. That should be the focus. Let's be United there. And then we're going to throw
the biggest party they ever saw in California, just locking in the details around that. I've been
talking to the organizers as just right before the show. So stay tuned. You'll be the first to hear it
if you're on our newsletter. If you want to get those hotel rooms in time,
Get on our newsletter.
We're going to be announcing as soon as we know all the details.
Keep asking questions.
I mean, I don't know what else to say.
You know, I don't consider myself incredibly like some rocket scientist or anything.
I have an amazing team that investigates.
But what I do have is an insatiable curiosity.
I have a healthy skepticism.
I don't just believe what I'm told.
I want to see the proof.
And I know you're the same way, which is, you know, why we are here.
why perhaps we're going to survive whatever this is.
We're not going to end up on some death list for an insurance company in the middle of, you know,
our family is trying to figure out how to get paid in some lawsuit as insurance companies go after the
governments of the world.
Things are going to get interesting, folks.
Keep a sense of humor.
Take some time with your kids this weekend.
Remember what's important.
We can't let all of this cloud our vision and make us, you know, afraid.
There's nothing to be afraid of.
I think all of this was so necessary.
Look how many people are recognizing that their governments are out of control, that we've been sitting in our barca loungers and, you know, eating cupcakes too long while the world was getting away from us.
It's time to bring it back.
It's time to put the dog back on the leash.
We are in charge.
We will keep representing that.
Ask questions.
Be curious.
And tell everyone you know to come over and watch the high wire.
They feel alone.
We're getting together every Thursday.
I love you. I'll see you next week.
