The Highwire with Del Bigtree - TURNING THE TIDE

Episode Date: July 18, 2022

Del Steps Out On A High Wire…Literally!; Turning The Tide in Vegas; Natural Immunity Wins Again; All-Star Docs Hit the Freedom Fest Stage with DelGuests: Valerie Durham, Dr. Robert Malone, Dr. Richard Urso, Dr. Pierre KoryBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-highwire-with-del-bigtree--3620606/support.

Did you notice that this show doesn't have any commercials? I'm not selling you diapers or vitamins or smoothies or gasoline. That's because I don't want corporate sponsors telling us what to investigate and what to say. Instead, you're our sponsors. This is a production by our nonprofit, the informed consent action network. If you want more investigations, more hard-hitting news. If you want the truth, go to Ican Decide.org and donate now. Good morning, good afternoon, good evening, wherever you,

are out there in the world, it's time to step out onto the high wire. And I mean a real high wire. Why? Because it's Vegas, baby. Vegas. All right. I got to tell you, I've been walking the high wire a long time, but that was tough. Well, I'm excited. We built a brand new stage just for Freedom Fest here in the middle of Las Vegas. We got a huge, awesome show going, and we're going live now. Just give you any sense of what it's like to get your team to take a studio and move it all the way from Austin, Texas into the middle of, you know, this event center. It's been quite an ordeal and want to thank my team for the incredible work they've done

to make this all happen. Because we are here at Freedom Fest, which is, you know, really, I would say, a libertarian event, we know that we have brand new eyes on this show today. Many of you who have never watched the high wire before, so maybe you're asking yourself, What is this all about? So let me just very quickly explain. My name is Del Bintree. I was a producer on the CBS talk show The Doctors.

I won an Emmy Award, celebrating the best that science and medicine has to offer. And then I stumbled upon a story about a whistleblower inside the CDC, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, that came forward and said they were committing scientific fraud on the vaccine safety studies. And specifically, a study looking at the MMR vaccine, the measles, mumps, rebella vaccine, and its correlation to autism. The study was done between 2000 and 2004,

and as Dr. William Thompson, that whistleblower said, we committed scientific fraud, we kicked kids off the study, we manipulated that study to remove what we were seeing was a very strong correlation between the MMR vaccine and autism. And ever since then, that was the last study ever funded by the United States of America looking at this question that parents across the world have been discussed, which is it appears that our child regressed into autism right after receiving their MMR vaccine.

I ended up making a documentary about that called Vaxed from cover up to catastrophe. And then as I toured the country with a bus that said Vaxed on the side of it, we had people signing the names of their children that had been injured and those that had been lost and those that had died. And as we started doing interviews all over the country, I realized that it wasn't just autism, that every single vaccine seemed to be contributing to some. somebody's demise, whether it was a death, or I can't tell you how many parents would say to me,

our child never got to the MMR vaccine. Our child regressed into autism right after the D-TAP vaccine, the diphtheria tetanus and accellular pertussis vaccine. Or our daughter was a star athlete, and she has been paralyzed ever since receiving her Gardasil vaccine. And because of those stories and the question that kept coming to me, which was, Dell, is this really just about the MMR vaccine and autism? What about the other vaccines? I didn't have answers to that. And so I started my nonprofit, the informed consent action network, to do one thing, to investigate

the entire vaccine program, every single childhood vaccine. And really, even more specifically, there's two things we hear when we hear the term vaccination. What we hear is it's safe and effective. I spent five years investigating one word of that, and that is safety. How have we determined that vaccines are safe? And so I brought it a team of scientists that I work with internationally. I have a legal team that has brought lawsuits against the National Institute of Health, the CDC, the FDA, health and human services.

We've won those lawsuits to try and uncover what is one of the, I believe, the greatest cover-ups of all time. Well, at the center of that discussion that got me started was autism. And this is something that people said, DEL, there's so many other issues with vaccines. Why deal with autism? I said, because it's one of the greatest travesties. And I believe that once we realize what happened there, we will understand what has happened with our health in this country and around the world, which is decreased in our children at exponential rates as the increase of the vaccination program has been begun. But when we talk about autism, the conversation always been by mainstream media and scientists and doctors around the world is vaccines don't cause autism. Those studies have been done, which I have proved, and you've been watching the highway, you know they have not been done.

But what they will say is that, yes, autism's on the rise. It was once one in 10,000, which was essentially it didn't exist. But what happened was autism didn't increase. What increased was our ability to diagnose autism, that we just are diagnosing autism better. And so today we're going to discuss a lot of things, but I want to make this clear. How bad was the science around autism? How long does it take for the entire medical industry to diagnose autism correctly because back in the 1970s and 80s, if it was one in 10,000, we didn't seem to have a grip on it

because then it became 1 in 5,000. And then it became 1 in 500. So were we diagnosing it correctly then? Because then it became 1 in 250. Oh, now are we finally diagnosing it correctly? Or the argument went on, well, 150. One in 150 children now have autism. And then 1 in 65 was about where I made backs. That's where we were. 1 in 65 was now being diagnosed with autism. And so I asked you then, right about in 2015-2016, surely the science had figured out how to diagnose this issue. And so we shouldn't have seen it grow beyond that if the argument was true that autism has always been here, we're just diagnosing it better.

But for everybody that still has a working brain cell out there, let me make my, no, I think the clearest argument that can be made, written very appropriately in a book called Denial, if you want to look into it. But this is it. We looked at some of the greatest diagnosticians of our time, you know, back with Charcot and Tourette's and Freud. You know what these guys did? They walked into insane asylums and they described every malady they could find. In fact, the details of schizophrenia and other issues like that are most clearly defined by these people that are really ahead of our time. They couldn't fix these issues, but they sure wrote about everything they saw. And of all those guys that were, you know,

obsessed with writing about every issue they found inside of the insane asylum, we do not have one single description of autism ever drawn up by those guys. And so I want to ask you this. If we were at 1 in 65 since the dawn of man, don't you think we would have seen someone with autism inside of one of those insane asylums? And remember, back in those days, you would just put your kids in insane asylum. They told you this isn't your responsibility. They've gone crazy. They have a demon inside of them or whatever it was. So unlike in a more modern age where we have started to take care of our Down syndrome children and take care of those that have schizophrenia. We keep them in the house, but we did in fact during Charcot and Tourette's

and those guys. So where was the description of autism? I say all of this now because this week, one of the most alarming studies that has come out has now stated what we said in Baxed. Let me show you what we said in Baxe before we even get to that headline in Baxe. We reached out to mathematician and scientist, Stephanie Senniv, who calculated the wrong. rise in autism since about 1970s, and this is what she predicted back in 2016 when our documentary released. Every couple of years, the CDC provides a number of what percentage of the kids are diagnosed with autism, and you've got the dots going all the way back to 1975, you draw the line,

it is a perfect exponential curve. If we assume that things are going to continue, as they have for the past 30 years into the future, we can predict that by 2032, 80% of the boys born will end up on the autism spectrum. Half the children, 80% of the boys. Now what she did, they would simply take the numbers as they were rising and said if it continues on this curve, we will be diagnosing essentially one and two boys by 2032. Well, this week, once again, the numbers have come in,

and apparently, if we're going to list the science, they still haven't learned to diagnose autism correctly because it rose again. at this headline. Autism among American children and teens surged 50% in three years from 2017, back when doctors didn't know what they were talking about, to now with 1 in 30 kids diagnosed with a disorder by 2020. The study finds. And remember, autism is more prevalent in boys. It's about one in five. Is that it? 20% of boys are now being diagnosed with autism. And so this is a pandemic. no one wants to talk about. And why is it happening? The one thing we know is science refuses to look at the vaccine-autism connection, and they will continue to belittle those parents that state

that they've watched the regression of their child. They will tell them they're crazy. And if they continue to ask too many questions, we will start having doctors tell them to see a therapist, and we might even have child protective services come and visit you to see if you are adequate as a parent. That is the world that it was just a couple of years ago. This is what I've been talk about on the high wire, but now we have a new issue. We have coronavirus. And for the first time ever, a vaccine has come along, and that vaccine wasn't for children who couldn't speak for themselves. We weren't going to have the ability to tell parents that they were crazy when they said it looked like their children were regressing into some sort of issue or dying.

Now the people being vaccinated were the doctors themselves, the scientists themselves, the teachers, the lawyers, the politicians. And so when they start having issues, we knew we would see something different. And so I don't know how aware you are of the headlines that are out there ever since we've had the COVID vaccine, but there's a new term we're all talking about that I frankly had never heard of before. Sudden adult death syndrome. SADS. This is actually a medical term being used. What does it mean? It means people are dropping dead for some unknown reason. The headlines look a lot like this and I'm not, you know, heart attacks on the rise amongst the under 40 crowd. Why would that be? Doctors baffled by sudden adult death syndrome in healthy young people.

Healthy young people are dying suddenly and unexpectedly from a mysterious syndrome as doctors seek answers through a new national register. Young woman who went to gym and walked 10,000 steps a day dies suddenly in their sleep. Pictured New Bride 30 who was found dead in a tanning salon cubicle in Swansea after collapsing with a suspected heart problem. Josh Gad mourned sudden death of 20-year-old nephew, life cut far too short. Swimmer, Mariosofia Paparo, who died following a heart attack, was due to be married today. I could do this. You could run this. This could go on all day long. We've never seen anything like it. Hundreds of athletes plunging face first into the turf of the stadiums that they're playing in. We have never had this moment before. Now look, I'm not saying that all of these issues are being caused by vaccines,

but what I am saying is I do not ever remember seeing so many headlines of people dying in their sleep, or dying or having a heart attack while playing soccer and plunging face first into the turf. So at some point, if we as an intelligent species, we've got to sit down and say we must be allowed to ask the question. And as we think about autism and the cover up that said that autism's always been here, how are they going to cover up all these people that are suddenly dying? Well, we're seeing those headlines too. And they look exactly like this. blood clots. The nation's favorite drink could make your blood sticky and it's an increasing risk. What are they talking about? They're talking about all you tea drinkers in England. Doesn't matter you've been drinking tea since the dawn of man. Now we know that it's causing blood clots and could kill you. TV watching may interest risk of severe blood clots. Really? Okay, I didn't know that. Hot weather. Warning that dehydration could lead to blood clots. Now remember that one of the side effects known for these vaccines is blood clots, but no, it's actually the hot.

hot weather. And forget about all the people that have lived in Arizona for years, and I don't remember them dropping like flies, or how is anyone alive in Africa. But this is what we're putting up with. And there's more. Sleep is now one of the risk factors for heart diseases and heart attacks. Blood clots. How do you sleep? One position may increase the risk of deep vein thrombosis. So don't blame the jab, folks. What we've got to blame is this sudden, dangerous increase in people have forgotten how to sleep. And here we have it, green fingers, urgent warnings to gardeners. as soil increases risk of killer heart disease. Folks, we cannot put up with this.

Seriously, we are not this stupid. And that's what has been so great about the high wire. Our audience has increased to millions throughout COVID because so many of you are waking up to the truth. Now, whether or not you got the vaccine, I know that you believe you were doing what was right and you were doing what was right for the population, but we've got to look at things square in the face now.

Did this vaccine work? Did it achieve what it needed to do? And how would we know if it was causing problems, especially when we're having emergency use authorization releases that don't do proper safety testing? And then as soon as it releases, we erase our control group, the placebo group, by saying, hey, it'd be unethical to keep this study going any further. And so we literally almost have no safety around these vaccines whatsoever. And so we're left to see what's happening in humanity. Well, earlier this year, if you were watching the high wire, I predicted how we were going to see this difference, how we would know if the back. vaccine was causing problems no one wanted to admit to. This is me back in March of 2022.

People say, Del, they're going to try and hide it. Hide what? You might be able to hide COVID deaths. You might be able to sort of, you know, manipulate the COVID deaths and take people that are having heart attacks and put them in the COVID category. You might be able to hide the actual, you know, COVID vaccine rates and who was truly vaccinated. Were they fully vaccinated? Were they they fully vaccinated? Did they only have one shot? Was there only 14 days after the second shot? They're manipulating all of that. But one thing you cannot. manipulate is the all-cause mortality, just meaning if there's a rise in just death across the board in every nation, that is going to be really hard to hide.

That's what I said, all-cause mortality. Keep your eye on the all-cause mortality. Well, let's look at the headlines because that's exactly what's happening. This is the headline out of the UK by the telegraph. Excess deaths, also known as all-cause mortality on the rise, but not because of COVID. It goes on to say this. latest data from the Office for National Statistics showed there was a 1,540 excess deaths in the week ending June 24th, but only around 10% were due to coronavirus. The O&S reported 752 excess deaths

in the home in the last week, 30% more than usual and more than hospitals and care homes put together. This is exactly why a proper government investigation is required, he said. This is not just displacement from hospitals. I do not understand how this is not being properly discussed, Dr. Charles Levinson, chief executive of the private GP company Dr. Call. Now, when we think about this, right, we want, he's saying, I want the government to investigate. So I'm going to ask you this. The same government that forced everybody to receive this vaccine or they couldn't work or they couldn't get on a plane or they couldn't travel, they lost their jobs because of it.

So now the government, if it ends up being vaccines that are causing this death, do you really think that they're going to blame themselves and say, sorry everybody, sorry about the job? Sorry about the death of your loved one. That's on us. Our bad, we made this mistake. Maybe, as it turns out, we should have done proper safety studies on this product before we gave it to the entire world. I doubt that's going to happen.

But it doesn't matter because we, the people, are what decide how our governments move. Who we voted next and whether we want to ever see this happen again. But if you think it looks bad in England, all-cause mortality, look what we're now seeing happening in Canada, specifically Alberta. This is an article that just came out. deaths with unknown causes, now Alberta's top killer in the province. This is what this article goes on to show us, that in 2019, it appears that this new category comes along in the way that we die. Other ill-defined and unknown cause mortality.

We have an unknown mortality block now. In 2019, the amount of people that died in Alberta from unknown causes or sudden death was about 500. Then you look at 2020 that rises. It goes up to about 1,500 deaths. Unexplainable, unknown, died into sleep, no idea why it happened. Couldn't possibly be the vaccine. We're injecting everybody and like stopping you from traveling. But look at 2021 folks. It goes all the way up to 3,500 deaths in the category, which is simply, we don't know. We're doctors. We're incapable of diagnosing what actually happened to this person. I guess we've gone back to caveman times in the abilities that doctors have to diagnose what the hell is going on with citizens in Alberta. If you look at this on a

chart, when we think of the top 10 reasons you die, when this entered the category in 2019, the unknown mysterious deaths was number 10 in the top 10 reasons you die. In 2020, it became the number four biggest reasons for death in Alberta, the unknown category. And in 2021, the leading cause of death in Alberta, Canada is we don't freaking know. That's it. That's The category of we have no idea what's going on, maybe we should investigate it. I told you it was going to be all-cause mortality, and here we are. They can keep trying to cover it up, and you know they will, because the governments will come crashing down. We will lose all faith.

We will have to re-elect presidents and prime ministers. And what will we do when that happens? What will those governments do? And the cronies that they've been holding this whole thing together, the lies and the deceit, the control of the people will come crashing down. Well, I'll tell you what, as they try to cover it up, as they try to cover their tracks and make excuses, one thing's for sure. The high wire will never let them get away with it. That is why we're here. That is what this is about.

We're not psychic. We don't have some incredible foreseeing ability. We have journalists and doctors and lawyers all willing to tell the truth. And that's all we've been doing, reporting the exact numbers as we found them. So today, we have a giant show coming up. And I have a couple of those masterminds, those doctors that actually still know how to practice medicine. Dr. Robert Malone is joining me. Dr. Pierre Corey is going to be here.

And Dr. Richard Erso, true heroes in the fight for truth throughout this pandemic. But first, I want to talk a little bit about this incredible event. We packed up vans back in Austin, Texas. We packed every piece of equipment we had. We came out here because we wanted to reach a new audience. We wanted to get into the hearts and minds of those people that still believe in liberal. still believe in freedom. That is Freedom Fest.

And this is a little taste of what that's all about. One of the best things about Freedom Fest is, while you can go to other places to talk about liberty and things like that, here you find diverse of people who will always teach you something new and make you think differently about Liberty Movement. There are all kinds of vendors here, all kinds of electives, there are speakers, celebrities. We all have one thing in common.

We think that there's too much government, and we think that our personal freedoms have eroded over time. So many of your favorite libertarian celebrities are here at Freedom Fest. You can not only get to hear them speak, you get to talk to them because our speakers are part of the action. Freedom Fest is an amazing opportunity for freedom lovers from all over the world to meet and interact, strategize, and come up with ways to advance our principles both in the culture and within the political space.

Because Freedom Fest attracts a wide range of people, both conservative and libertarian, Republican, maybe there might even be a few progressives here, we have an opportunity to network with people who otherwise I might have to take a flight across the country to talk to. I think people should come to Freedom Fest for the friendship, getting to know folks, getting to talk with people that have similar views, but also can kind of challenge you a little bit. One of the best things about Freedom Fest is coming here and learning that you are not, you are not, you know, not alone in your fight for freedom in this country. There are so many like-minded people who share your beliefs,

who share your values, who are ready to stand shoulder to shoulder with you as we advocate for a freer society. I think it's very pro-America. People that are very much interested in how our country was started. Are we going off track? And is there a way to get back on? Freedom Fest is one of the most important places to go every single year if you're in any way, shape, or form connected to the Liberty Movement.

Because if you're not here, people think something's wrong. You're supposed to be here. So be here. Freedom Fest is just fantastic. This is my first time at Freedom Fest, and I absolutely recommend Freedom Fest from all the liberty lovers all over the world, all over Latin America. When you depend on a hand to feed you, you empower that same hand to starve you. capitalism gives us the permission to think entrepreneurily about problems. Liberty will win.

And when it wins, it will be because of you. Well, it's an amazing event, and I am honored to be joined right now by the executive director of Valerie D. Durham. Thank you so much. Thank you so much, Del. Thank you for being here, and thank you for bringing the high wire to Freedom Fest. This is amazing. We're so excited about this.

We've been having some technical issues because it's a little bit different than what we're used to. but it's just amazing event. I mean, I do a lot of events. I go to, you know, all sorts of, you know, I guess other Liberty Conference, but also Medical Freedom conferences. But I will say this is one of the biggest I've been to. So, you know, how would you describe Freedom Fest?

What type of people find themselves coming here? Thank you so much. Yeah, Freedom Fest is a four-day extravaganza of Liberty. We really invite anyone who cares about Liberty to come together. All right. Talk right into it. Just talk right into it. Yeah, you're right.

So anyone who cares about liberty to come together, to learn, share, network, grow, so that we can really move forward. We want to hear a lot of different perspectives, not just in politics, the political freedom is really important, but there's economic freedom, health freedom, financial freedom, different social issues we need to come around, like education reform, drug legalization. These are the issues we need to be talking about. So we bring all these different perspectives together to have a real civil discourse

and not all the rancor and fighting and, you know, name-calling that we usually see. see so much out there in the media and in the political discourse. We really try to just have really deep conversations about liberty here. When I think about liberty, I think about libertarianism. One of the things that's interesting is that grew up a progressive liberal from Boulder, Colorado. I mean, like we're, you know, the crystal mountain of liberal thought. But I'll say this, that, you know, growing up, there was moments where friends of mine would jump ship from being liberals into calling themselves libertarian. I think Ron Paul had a huge part to pull. And so in my mind, I always imagined that, you know, libertarian was somewhere between being

a Democrat and Republican. But then, as I got on to traveling the country dealing with this issue on medical freedom and vaccine freedom, I found myself an event down in Texas. It was this breakfast that was being hosted by the Republican or the conservative women of Texas. They said, we're the most conservative county and the most conservative state in the country. And when I was talking and speaking of them, they all referenced to themselves as being libertarian. And that that was far right of being Republican. And for the first time ever, I thought, wait a minute, libertarian is not a centrist's perspective?

Is it far right? And then why is it that when you leave being a Democrat, you go to being a libertarian before you go to a Republican? And it made me sort of think of this thing as more of a circle where we sort of meet somewhere in the middle, but it's not a line. Do you feel like you're seeing a growth from both directions, both from the liberal party and also from, you know, Democrats? And we try to reach out to all different. political perspectives because there is overlap. And that's what's so important. We are so taught that there are two sides and there's a huge divide. And that is not the case. You can look at job security, taxation. You can look at different social issues like our schools. I mean, that has exploded over the time

of the pandemic. There are so many different political perspectives where we have that overlap. And really, what we're adhering to are these key principles of equality, freedom of expression, individual rights, private property rights, that we think build the foundation of a free society. So we are really trying to subscribe to those and find anyone who kind of agrees with that. So I like to think of libertarianism as a triangle myself with that up at the top, and everyone else kind of coming into that and supporting it. When you finally wake up, you get to the libertarian view. Other people may see it differently.

But I agree with you. But finding that overlap where we do agree is what we're all about here. freedom fest and then how do we enlarge it, how do we understand each other so that we can move forward and actually make progress in our society? You know, I think the concern is that in a lot of these, like I guess in some ways, libertarian is considered by the Republican Party and the Democrat Party as, you know, a fringe group. But it is definitely growing.

It seems to be definitely growing in sentiment. We're seeing libertarian candidates actually running on those platforms and winning. How important is it to have more than, you know, two points? parties in this country. How much is that a part of what's happening? I think it's so important. And as we keep having this bigger and bigger divide, and we see the rancor between the two sides, the blue and the red and the left and the right, and we really don't use labels like that here so that people keep their minds open. Too often when you say someone's a conservative, think, I know what they think, so I'm not going to listen, or someone's a leftist, so I'm not

going to listen. So we try to get rid of all that. And as a result, we end up having those conversations in a really profound way. But the reason that it's growing is because of that grand division where we've not seen a lot of progress. And people are realizing, I don't really want to be aligned either way. What's the alternative? And I will say that libertarian values are very philosophically principled. And that's one of the things I really appreciate about libertarianism. I agree. And I think one of the things, and I say now I'm politically marooned. I'm definitely not at all relating to many of my friends and family members. We are, you know, really having difficult. I'm trying to find ways to have

that conversation. think about, you know, if I'm going to call myself, I guess the easiest thing that would be libertarian. And the sense of that is I just, I want a smaller government. I don't want, you know, so much overreach by the federal government. Something I never really thought about. What's the problem with big government? I remember thinking back when, you know, government can, you know, save people and fix the situations, but you start realizing they're doing a terrible job at almost everything they touch. But isn't it really that somehow we're coming back to, and I think at this moment, this pandemic in so many ways showed how the destruction of the Constitution of the United

States of America. To me, libertarianism is getting back to just the fundamental basics, the least amount of government necessary to walk amongst each other without killing each other and leave me alone otherwise. That seems to be what our founding father said, look, and they said, this is a necessary evil. There's no government that's going to be perfect. You have to stay vigilant, but we've given you something and that if you take care of it, if you don't overfeed this rabid this dog that will take you over and attack you, that this is the best system we have, there seems to be in our core, as you said, sort of that, I think, that inherent wisdom that's inside of us, given to us, I think, by God, if you will, that really makes so much sense, and it seems that people are realizing if we tear away all the trappings of the parties that we've been sort of blinded by, and this pandemic where both sides jumped in and took away our rights, we all sort of,

saying, wait a minute, what was this document that started this whole dream here in America? And I think the really deeper questions are starting to. So everyone talks about freedom of expression, you know, or freedom of religion. What does that really mean? What does it mean to have privacy? What does it mean to have private property? And as people are saying, you have to shut down your business or you have to wear a mask over your face, you know, what is security and safety versus what is freedom? And you have freedom of expression. You also have the freedom not to express. You have the freedom to engage and assemble and to not engage in assemble. What do you turn the dial on?

You don't have to listen to everything. It's great when you're open-minded and want to engage and learn something more, but you don't have to. And there's almost becoming this expectation of force that says you must. You must adhere. You must listen. You must believe what we believe. And we've really lost that nuance of I can maybe hear what you have to say or choose not to. and both of those are okay.

That's what a lot of turning the tide, our theme this year is about, is that you have seen this just monumental growth in statism, authoritarianism, control. And how do we turn the tide and come back to more individuality, more choice, and more, you know, the favorite word is tolerance. But what is true tolerance?

And so I think some of those deeper conversations are going on now, and that's also leading to the growth that we see with popularity and investigation of libertarian values. You know, you make such an important point that one of the things that was so shocking about this pandemic was, as you said, we have the right to not do something. We have a right to not engage. This is the first time that I can think of where it was almost illegal to not inject yourself with a product.

To just opt out, I opt out. When has it ever been illegal to say, I'm just, I don't want to take part? And I have a problem with anybody. I'm opting out. It's illegal to opt out. It's illegal to opt out of covering my face. I thought if there's a deadly virus out there, I should be allowed to die breathing it in. If that's my decision, I've seen all of your science, you don't get to make me do something.

I mean, these laws were so outrageous because we're being forcibly injected. We're being forcibly, you know, have restriction to the oxygen in our atmosphere. And so I think it's such a glaring point and perspective that now, more than ever, it is so critical that people wake up. So when we come to a conference, and those people that have come out to be a part of something like this, what is the takeaway message? What is it going to take to actually make it so that our entire country in America and is the beacon of light and hope for the entire world? How do we get out and change this so that the majority once again return to actually freedom and liberty and staying to the values given to us both through our biblical scriptures but also are written right into the doctor?

the Constitution of the United States, Declaration of Independence, what's it going to take? Well, Del, you have just tasked me with a very big answer. Yes. I'm supposed to have the answer to that. Well, I will say that my discovery has been when people of good conscience and good principles come together and interact to understand rather than to preach or to have all their rhetoric involved and just you need to understand me, but how do we understand each other? that creates the platform for number one more nuanced thinking rather than the monolithic thinking of this is right, this is wrong, but what is the truth?

And I think as we come back to what is truth and what actually creates a healthy human being with choice, with sovereignty, with individuality, and how do I engage with my fellow human beings in a fair, honest, and open way from a place of personal ethics? And we discuss that here, and we see that in this big exhibit hall, that's what's happening right now, is a fair, honest, honest, and open way, from a place of personal ethics. And we discuss that here, and we see that in this big exhibit hall, that's what's happening right now, is a free engagement of ideas and opportunities. And that's what people are going to take away. They're going to meet people here. They're going to meet ideas here that they can take forward with them and actually change their lives and the lives of people around them. That's what happens. Well, I want to thank you.

It's an incredible event. I think the biggest one you've had yet. Yes, it is. So you're growing, you're here in the middle of Las Vegas in one of the most beautiful convention centers in the country. Keep up the good work. Thank you so much for being here. Thank you, Del. Absolutely. Thank you. All right, well, it's time for, you know, many people's favorite part of the high wire, and I'm talking about the Jackson Report.

The way we had to do it in here, so we're kind of joxing around here. All right. Where is my single? Right here? All right. Okay. Okay. Jeffrey. Jackson, we so often do this by Zoom. It's really awesome to have you here, you know, in person, getting to sort of go through the news. I got to get this, this cord is too short to do that. Hold on. Hold on. Okay, got a little bit more court. How's that? All right. Hold on. It's live. Here it is. Okay. Um, nothing to do

so, it's an amazing event here, you know, discussing freedom, but there's so much going on in the world today. So, yeah, I'm really looking forward to what you have to share. You bet. Hey, hey, before we get into that, though, we've covered a lot of stuff, five years and counting on the Highwire and a lot of controversial topics. You've done a lot of crazy things. I've never actually seen you go on a highwire. I get to Vegas yesterday and I'm told you walked to High Wire. It's true. It's obviously how we've opened the show and, you know, it was funny. Like, since we started with some big Paulton still the High Wire, there's always been this idea to try and get out to a photo shoot, you know, of me like stepping out in Ohioire, how cool that would be. Well, coming to Vegas,

you know, Patrick, one of our creative directors said, this is the moment. I know I can buy you find you a high wire somewhere in Las Vegas. And I thought, you know what? I'll give that a shot. Now, I am lucky. I mean, growing up in Colorado, I was a rock climber as a teenager. I was a gymnast and I was a kid. So I felt like, even though I put on some pounds

and maybe not quite in that climbing shape, there's a chance I could pull this off, but it wasn't quite as easy as I thought, and there was a few hiccups. Here's what that looked like when we did it. Hi. Luis Acosta, yes. All right, my name's Del Bigtree.

I'm actually the host of an internet talk show called the high wires. So every week, I tell my audience, let's step out on the high wire, but I've never actually stepped on a high wire in my life. So I'm hoping we're going to get a chance to do that today. Am I in the right place? Well, let me set your mind at ease. I'm a third generation high wire walker. Okay.

My parents have done it before me and my grandparents before that. So I think you'll be in good hands. All right, cool. So what's the secret to pulling off the high wire? Well, honestly, a lot of practice and confidence. Okay. I want you to see your target. Believe it.

Stay in your zone and follow through. All right. I've got a feeling you can handle this. All right. Let's do it. Call wants to talk to you. What? Executive producer wants to talk to you.

Hey, Jan, what's up? Hey, Del. How's it going? It's going good. I just totally rocked it out. I can't believe it. I made it across. We got it.

It's locked. Done. I actually saw a picture of you up on the tightrope, which was very cool, except I really wasn't digging the t-shirt and vest setup. I think we should really see you in the quintessential Del Big Tree look.

The tie, the shirt, the vest, the rolled-up sleeves. I mean, that just says Del Big Tree to me. And we're going to be using this for a lot of future, probably promo stuff, and I just want to make sure that you look the way that we all know and love you. So is it any chance you could, I know it's hot, do it one more time, walk the tightrope and change and do it again?

You're kidding, right? I'm not kidding. Jen, it's like 107 degrees out here. My thighs are totally burned. I'm not sure I can get it again. Please, please, please. Pretty please. All right, okay, whatever.

All right. When are you gonna be here? Would have been nice if you were here, you know? I was just trying to set up the stage and get everything ready to go at Freedom Fest. All right. She wants me to do it again. So just like in, you know, behind the scenes,

true high wire fashion here. You all just saw me nail this, But apparently, you know, the t-shirt and the vest is not like the high wire look. So my executive Jen Sherry just called me and said that she wants me to do it one more time with the shirt and the vest and ties. So they guess, you know, so we could use it in the future and things like that. So I guess I'll go try and cool off in the shade. I think it's about 105 degrees in the shade instead of 110 it is right here. And we'll see if we can do this one more time.

All right. Okay. Let's see if this is 10 degrees. Well, it was going awesome until you fall. Well, the people really want to see Delt and his quintessential. I get it. I get it. Look at that.

That's what I'm talking about. All right. Well, I hear. Good morning. Good afternoon. Good evening. Whatever you are out there in the world, it's time to step under the high wire. And I mean, a real high wire.

Why? Because it's Vegas, baby. Vegas. All right. The right choice. That's what happens. Every once in a while, here on the high wire, not just trying to get it first, we want to get it right. And Jan, I think it was a good call. We're going to use that footage. I really do feel like we are walking on high wire now like never before. It seems as though, you know, COVID is sort of in the background right now. We're going to discuss the new variants of things coming up with Robert Malone here at Corey and Dr. Erso. But there's really a lot going on. in the world right now, it's quite alarming. Yeah, absolutely. One of the biggest stories right now in the world,

and for our U.S. audience that may not know this, there is a, it's been called a rebellion in the Netherlands of Dutch farmers. So to bring people up to speed. Let's take a look at some of the news montage we have put together for this. Take a look. Massive farmer protests have broken out around the Netherlands. The government in the Netherlands is shutting down farms in the name of climate change. Why is the Dutch Prime Minister pushing this anti-agricultural,

He wants to reduce nitrogen emissions by so much. It's going to throw tens of thousands of farmers here in the Netherlands out of job. The government there ordered farmers to slash emissions from their cows by 50%. A 50% reduction in 2030, that's in seven years. It's simply unfeasible. The Netherlands has been ramping up regulations despite farmers saying they need a time to adapt and to go slow or they will go out of business. This natural deal policy is a natural deal policy

is, let me say, a disaster. Farmers say they are being unfairly targeted as opposed to big businesses and industries. Many are vowing to resist any plans to scale down or close farms. Farmers across the country held mass demonstrations and blocked highways with their tractors. Maneur has been sprayed in front of some of the government buildings.

Media buildings have been blocked with tractors, trucks and surrounded with poo. A few of them had a scaffold with police officials. Police have been using tear gas on the farmers, and military tanks have been called in to deal with the blockades. Police opened fire at protesters in a tractor as farmers stormed the streets. A 16-year-old boy in a tractor was shot at by police and arrested and held in jail for driving a tractor at one of these protests.

After weeks of blocking highways and some confrontations with police, now they're targeting the very core. of society foods. So this new order of the Netherlands would have the effect of destroying agriculture in the Netherlands. We're seeing potential food shortages here, and that's really a fear as well, correct? I mean, that's absurd right now, right? From in the world where there's not enough food, and then we're saying, no, let's produce less food. I think we're going to see a lot more protest because nobody has told anyone

on how incredibly costly these promises are and people are going to revolt when they start seeing the bills. I've spent some time years ago traveling in the Netherlands and these images are shocking. There's a very peaceful place. It's a beautiful people's a great country. Always seems to not engage in sort of battles around the world. It's sort of a live and let live country so to see these images, you know, tractors and people being shot at. It's really, it's like what's next? We've seen it here in America, the riots here. You know, it's just, Netherlands, seriously?

What's really going on here? And these protests have been simmering underneath the social fabric for some time now, at least three years. Take a look at this headline from 2021. This was, Netherlands announced this $25 billion euro plan to radically reduce livestock numbers. They're trying to reduce the nitrogen pollution from animal manure, but also fertilizer use. And what that led to, the farmers were already really mad about this. They've been going back and forth with their government. So it's both ranchers and, you know, agricultural farmers.

Yes. You can't get fertilized because it's nitrogen to grow vegetables. Right. And you've got to get rid of your cows because I'm assuming, you know, take the crap, it's releasing nitrogen. Absolutely. Absolutely. And so what happened in the government there, this is the headline that started off this. I really call it a hot rebellion at this point because it is in full swing.

They're blockading. They're blockading towns, airports, government buildings. This is the headline here in June. So just last month, it says, Dutch government angers farmers with tough emission goals. And it goes on to say, calling it an unavoidable transition. The government mandated reductions in emissions of up to 70% in many places close to protected nature areas and as high as 95% in other places.

The ruling coalition earmarked an extra $24.3 billion to finance changes that will likely make many farmers drastically reduce. their numbers of livestock or get rid of them altogether. So we're talking about out of the farming business. We're talking about generations of farming, small and medium-sized farmers that put food on the table. They're done. Deadline 2030. And so this is a big-time issue.

There's really no lead-up to this transition plan. It was just a hammer that was dropped. And so here we have Fox News comparing it to something we've reported on here, the Canadian protest. Here's the headline here. Dutch farmers form freedom convoys. That's what they're calling. that, like it as the Canadian protest, to protest government's strict environmental rules.

But, Del, this is not contained. So one like Canada, which was with the COVID restrictions, that was obviously contained in Canada. This is spilling out into the European Union. So here's the headline here. This is starting to roll. Dutch farmers protest against emission cut spreads across EU. So we look at information from the World Bank about percentage use of agricultural land to really understand why this is spreading across the European Union. So if you look at this graph, we have four different European Union countries, member states. We have the Netherlands at the top, and you can see here 54% of the Netherlands is farmland. Of all of their land is farmland. We have Germany and Poland just under 50% of their entire country is farmland, and then in Italy down at the

bottom, just over 40%. So it makes sense that we're going to see, this is where we're seeing this action spill out into Germany, into Poland, into Italy. It's, it's not. It's a lot. It's It's spreading across and there's solidarity with the farmers in the Netherlands. So this is a big, big deal and a big problem for the leaders that are really pushing this hard. But where did this come from? Yeah. So everyone's seeing it now for the first time, really. But in 2017, the European Union pushed something called the EU Action Plan for Nature People and the economy.

And this is where it really started. So we have here in the Netherlands media reporting, they talked about the protected areas. This is the other aspect of this. So we're getting rid of the nitrogen. We're getting rid of the farming because of the cows. But we have these protected areas. And here's the headline here about these 131 protected areas. Nitrogen emissions must be reduced by 70% in 131 areas.

In many parts of the Netherlands, nitrogen emissions must be reduced by 70%. This concerns 131 areas close to vulnerable nature. This means that not all farmers can continue with their business, according to the nitrogen plans that the cabinet released today. So where did these things come from? We have 131 protected areas that just popped out of nowhere in 2017. So if we look at a map here, it's called Natura 2000. That is the term if anybody wants to look that up.

And you look at the map of the Netherlands here. Everything in green is a protected nature area. So you can see 54% of the country is farmland, and the rest of it is these nature areas. Now, if you have a farm and you're next to one of these nature areas, sorry, but you're going to have to reduce your nitrogen emissions. You're going to have to cut your livestock because we have to protect the, birds, the insects, the wildlife, the biodiversity make these things sustainable development.

So that's where that's really coming from. And why agriculture? This is really the key that's going to bring most people into this fold. And we're reporting on this for a long time, I believe. So we look at the International Food Policy Research Institute, and they published a paper called the Central Position of Agriculture within the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. Remember those words. And it says in there, as both a direct and indirect pathway to social,

and environmental dimensions of sustainable development. Agriculture, more than any other sector, is the common thread which holds the 17 SDGs together. These are sustainable development goals of what's called the Agenda 2030. And we're going to flash up here all of these goals. This is an agenda by the United Nations that is being kind of downloaded into our elected officials. The United Nations are unelected bureaucrats that are telling prime ministers, our president, how to run the country,

and we're seeing the business end of this agenda 2030 with these emissions cuts. So we look at this chart here. We have 17 sustainable development goals, and this is what's going on here. This is what they're trying to achieve. But if we look at them, they're not really achieving this. Number one's no poverty.

Number two, zero hunger. Well, just right there alone, you start cutting the food to people's... You're getting zero hunger if you're shutting down food supply. Exactly. Stopping people from getting fertilizer to grow the crops, you beat the people with. Exactly. Exactly, exactly.

And here in the United States, we have a lot of people onto this agenda. It's literally an agenda 2030, and they're pushing back. But other countries are in various phases of this push, this really radical push, climate push. And we're going to take a look here at Sri Lanka. This country has been in the news for over two weeks now. We have some footage here. We're going to look at, some B-roll we're going to show. And if you see here, this is the country, thousands upon thousands of citizens.

are storming the presidential residence. They get inside, they breach it, and eventually, I believe, it was burned. This is because we're going to cover why this was happening. But they also went to the bank, the central bank of Sri Lanka. Same treatment by the citizenry there. They breached it. They're unhappy.

They're protesting. Total chaos in the country right now. A lot of factors that really led to this bad monetary policy. They were doing hyperinflation of their currency. COVID lockdowns killed their total. tourism industry because there was no travel and they rely on that. There was nothing. But in the middle of that, let's look at this headline from 2021. It says here, economists October 2021, a rush to farm organically as plunged Sri Lanka's economy into crisis. And then we go to Al Jazeera,

present day January 2022. Here's the headlines, Sri Lanka to pay 200 million to compensation for failed organic farming drive. So they're giving these farmers that they botched this scheme. They're giving them all of this money to try to make it work, but the money is not really worth anything at this point. And what's really interesting, when we talk about these climate goals, Sri Lanka, according to the World Economic Research Organization, they have a ranking of zero to 100, 100 being the most, I guess, climately conscious country as far as emissions and all of those things and low impacts of the environment. Sri Lanka was at 98.1%. So they had an A-plus on this card, during their collapse and leading up to their collapse.

So you got to kind of scratch your head. But really, to connect this together, we have a Fox News contributor or an author. He really knocked this out of the park. Take a listen to this. There's an element of the green movement globally that is simply trying to make the world move too far, too fast on the green agenda.

And we've just seen some of the consequences in Sri Lanka. The Sri Lankan government fell for a bunch of, basically, left-wing, Western activist ideas about ESG, about environmental issues, including use of fertiliser and much more. And they went so fast, so fast on it that basically much of Sri Lanka's agriculture is not there anymore. It's agricultural industry that used to be so much of the country's export

is just not there because they went into the ESG agenda. They got higher markings in all of the international bodies even than Sweden, even than the US in this. And the result is shortages, riots and eventually the overturning of the government and the primaries are having to flee and work from a ship off the coast. Well, it's the same thing with the green activists in Europe and some of the ones we have here in the United States.

They all demand the same thing. They say, you've got to get off fossil fuels or you've got to get off fertiliser and all these sort of things. But none of their supposed solutions are yet in place. They want us to get off fossil fuels. They want us to get off all of the other things that they deprecate, nuclear and much more. But they don't yet have the green answers

that, yeah, you know, maybe we'll have down the road. but we don't know we don't now so you know sorry to make the pun about the tour de fronts they're trying to make us run before we can walk on green and the results are the sort of things we've just seen in Sri Lanka that is so well stated exactly what I wanted to say and when I think about when we were talking to Valerie about this event and bringing all sides together I want to be perfectly honest I still consider myself environmentalists I want clean air I want clean water want a clean food supply I don't like industries poisoning anything around me we have to

you with it. We have to figure out ways. I am aware, and I have been aware, that nitrogen runoff is a problem in rivers. It's a problem for wildlife. I get all of that. But here is my issue, and here's where I've really jumped ship and thought, you know, the party, the Democrats and how I grew up, whether this is political or not, I don't mean to make it that. But here's my beef. It's exactly what they just did. They just say, okay, go organic tomorrow. But they don't send in anyone to help. They don't send in any way to deal with it. I think about, you know, I argue with my family and friends, you know, when it came to like coal mining and saying, well, we've just got to stop coal. And those miners can, they can build solar panels. I said, you know, that's a

great thought. Do you see anyone in our government going and building a solar plant in a panel plant in the middle of West Virginia or whatever is? It's just, these are statements and the slogans, but they don't fit the reality. There are real human beings here, and we're all a part of this. This is going to be our food supply. And I want to say this. You know, there are people out there that could make this transition. Why aren't they calling Zach Bush? You know, to me, I mean, of all the interviews I've done and the people that I've just, disgust this issue with. I mean, I think he transcends all the parties, all the chaos, into ways that we can start moving people into better ways of farming. They're using less nitrogen,

things like all of that's possible, you know? And so that's what has to happen. But these people aren't being called. He's not getting a call for anyone out there that even has a question about, you know, Zach Bush, you've never heard of him. Go back and watch some of the episodes of the High Wire. But you have an opportunity coming up this week, just ironically, because this topic was coming up. Zach Bush is doing an event. This is on July 19th, 5 p.m. Easton Time. You can register at Farmersfootprint.us. Zach Bush is brilliant in the way that he has got ways that we can start moving people into better farming practices.

But that's where our billions of dollars should be going. When we're spending billions of dollars, it shouldn't be to figure out how to advertise the people that don't want to get a vaccine. How about let's get people to start learning out of farm better? How about we start giving resources? Why don't we bring in the Zach Bush's of the world and people like that to train other people? able to go out and really let's make the world a better place. I'm down with that, but this is not how we do it. Right, right, right. And you know, if you're sitting there, viewers, if you're sitting there and watching this in America and saying, well, that's some place, I don't know where,

Sri Lanka, Netherlands, never going to go there, doesn't matter. Not so fast, because in the United States, the Biden administration is using the EPA as its action arm to implement rapid changes, just like in the Netherlands, just like in Sri Lanka, right here in the United States. And the Supreme court took up that matter and they just recently had a decision on this and take a look. Before, yeah. That's where you're going, I want to make another point because what we think about, you know, one of the points before, because we're going to move into a whole different section about where this is going with the EPA.

Yeah. But we talk about this. You know what proves the line? You know what it proves the line whether it's in the Netherlands or Sri Lanka or anywhere else? They want to reduce nitrogen. Oh, we've got to protect the environment. Where the hell's Monsanto on this? Yes.

Not glyphacy. How about this trap you're pouring on all of our crops all over the world that is poisoning us? It's losing, for paying out billions of dollars for giving us non-Hodgkins lymphoma. No one of the news is talking about that. Oh, let's just stop all of your farming. Let's just shut down your farm, destroy our food supply. But we'll keep spraying this crap. By the way, you're worried about your environment?

You're worried about your birds? How about birds that are eating bugs and they're dying and fees that are dying and all the issues that are happening because of glyphosate? Nobody's moving on that. So I say bull crap to all of this. You're all a bunch of liars. This is not what this is about. This is about world control and domination,

not about making us healthier. I mean, look at the headline. This is the headline that we just saw this week. Disturbing weed killer ingredient. We're talking about glyphosate tied to cancer, found in 80% of U.S. urine samples. Right, right. We're all toxic with this crap.

Let's make a difference. We want to have a, you know, this is where I'm environmentalist. Get this out of my food. Right. Yes, sir. And we've watched the media provide cover for Monsanto for Bear during this

and not talk about the issues with Glyphosate during this whole time. So similar situation here with the EPA. This is NPR. This is the headline here with the EPA. Supreme Court restricts the EPA's authority to mandate carbon emissions reductions. It says here, this is Chief Justice John Roberts. He's writing for the court's majority. Chief Justice John Roberts said that under what the court has recently called the major questions doctrine, neither the EPA nor any other agency may adopt rules that are transformational to the economy unless Congress has specifically authorize such a transformative rule to address a specific problem like climate change.

So basically get back in your lane, EPA. You do not have authority here. So unfortunately... Oh, man, you should have heard my friends and family bellowing about this. And we saw the headlines, right? The CNN's of the world all saying, oh, the Supreme Court is an activist board is going to destroy our environment, which is not what this is about, right? This is about saying, no, no, no, no.

We need an EPA do your job. But once you come up with some grand plan and a great idea, idea, you're going to have to convince our Congress of it and use legislators to actually make a decision on this. Let's get back to using the three branches of government instead of just dictating from a president into a regulatory agency. And that's what we just saw with COVID, right? Yes. This cannot happen anymore. I'm so happy about the Supreme Court getting involved because Tony Fauci's not God and you don't get to lock me in my house and take away my job and tell me it's illegal to breathe a freaking air. That's right. And so while we're on the coronavirus restrictions,

they are losing. The government that tried to push these restrictions are losing. So in New York, this was a big win, New York State. And here's the headline. State Supreme Court shoots down quarantine and isolation provision. This is Section 213. Now, this was a Department of Health section that allowed quarantine for no specific amount of time for a reason that they don't have to, they don't have to prove you're sick, they can put you wherever they want. So you think about quarantine facilities, we see headlines of that, no age. So we're talking kids, we're talking elderly and this has been shot down now by three representatives in New York. We have George Borrello. He's a New York State Senator. We have Chris Tagg. He's a New York State Assemblyman

and Mike Lawler, also a New York State Assemblyman. We have our representatives getting off their butts and making things happen. And let's go to the actual decision. This is what the judge in the case wrote as his decision. He says, involuntary detention is a severe deprivation of individual liberty far more egregious than other health safety measures, such as requiring masks wearing at certain venues, involuntary quarantine may have far-reaching consequences such as loss of income employment and isolation from family. They're talking community and family, and they're fighting for us at that level. So this is a big win in the New York State Supreme Court. That is huge. It's so important, this idea that we could be basically taken captive prisoner in the United States

America or our kids. I brought this up early on with COVID. We had that guy like in Santa Barbara or something. You know, come born in the health department saying, hey, look, if you don't have enough toilets in your house, we might have to take, you know, a family member. And I tweet it out, what if that family member is your six-year-old daughter? Does anyone we've got a problem with that? Like, we're all cool with the fact that this is going to walk through our door

and take one of our family members away because COVID's in the neighborhood. I mean, this is crazy. And we all, you know, if you said five years ago, this was going to happen in the United States of America, everyone, that is a terrible movie script. It's overwritten that will never happen in a million years. That's right. And lo and behold, we're all on the other side of this moment.

What? Yes, sir. Absolutely. Absolutely. So we're also looking at the Biden administration. There was a basically a ruling saying that federal workers must get the COVID-19 vaccine. That has now been on hold. So here's the headline U.S. appeals court vacates federal vaccine mandate pending additional hearing.

So right now it is on hold. They're going to basically just shake it up again and restart the whole thing. But until then, federal workers, you have protection because it is on. hold. But now, let's get into some really big news. Los Angeles Unified School District. This is the second largest school district in all of the United States. We're talking over 600,000 kids, K-12, over 1,000 high schools. This is the headline. Anybody out there, if you're a parent sitting on the couch saying, what can I do? Listen to this headline. Judge rules in favor of father's son duo stating L-A-USD cannot issue vaccination requirements. It states here in the article. Judge Mitchell Beckoff

ruled that the current LAUSD mandate clash with both California state law and the state health and safety code by not allowing exemptions for personal beliefs. What the school district attempted to do was forget about California state law, forget about health code. They said, we're our own entity. We're going to make our own rules for COVID vaccines for these kids. And if you don't take them, we're mandating them. Get out of our school district. You go to independent schooling. And the judge said, no, no, no, you can't do that. And why is this important? Because I can, the informed consent action work. Yes, sir. With our lead attorney, Aaron Siri, is right now battling the San Diego Unified School District, one of the other biggest ones in the country. And this ruling in Los Angeles

is going to give credence to that ruling as well and help supercharge that. So expect us to report on that very soon as a legal win. Yes, sir. Looking good. And there's such a, it's a real theme here, right? Yeah. And what people I think don't understand is, look, California is still what they're saying, essentially is the health department's not allowed to mandate a vaccine upon you. The school district's not allowed to mandate a vaccine upon you. You have to go through the legislative process. Exactly what John Roberts put in a decision against the EPA. You are not going to use these agencies and these smaller groups to do your dirty work.

We've got to get back to letting elected officials. Now look, now it's upon us, right? It's back to the voters saying, you know what, do I like the legislators that are voting for these types of things? So that's the final straw. But it's getting back into our hands where there were these groups and these school boards and things, we couldn't touch them. Right, right. Getting funded by pharma to push all this stuff on the pits.

Right. And this is showing activation at the legal level with lawyers, activation at the reps level, because our reps are now pushing this and the grassroots level. We're all coordinating now to make some serious changes. This is huge news. Now let's go down out of the United States to Uruguay. Uruguay is doing something that a lot of

people only hope could happen in the United States. Check out this headline. We have ABC News. Uruguay dispends COVID vaccinations for children under 13. This is the lawyer in the case. Dentone said the government had failed to present the contracts with pharmaceutical giant Pfizer that he had requested. The government has said a confidentiality clause in the contract prevents it from sharing the document. Whoops, can't do it. The judge is seeking, among other things, to know whether there are clauses in the contracts that promise civil and

criminal immunity due to any adverse effects from the vaccine. Ricari, the judge, also wants information about the chemical composition of the vaccine. So this judge said, stop everything. If you're not going to give us the contract, you're not injecting our kids anymore until you give us this information. This is amazing. The beacon of light and hope and freedom right now in Uruguay,

and America is going to be following that. We're really nice to get ourselves back on track into representing this should be what we're reading in the United States of America. Yes, yes. You know, it's amazing. It's fantastic. And, Dale, speaking of Aaron Siri,

our lawyer, informed consent action network, I just got off the phone with him before we went on air. And I took some notes here. I'm going to read from them. This is big, big breaking news concerning a case that his law firm has taken. So this is in the Southern, the district court of the Southern District of Ohio. Siri and Glimstad, his law firm certified a class action issue for the entire Air Force for religious exemptions for a temporary restraining order on its way to a preliminary injunction perhaps in the next 14 days. for no action on any Air Force member or servicemen or woman.

Wow. Everything is paused at this point for religious exemptions. They originally were taking on a case for about 1 to 200 Air Force members that had religious exemptions. The Air Force was not honoring those. Now the judge ruled that the Air Force has to stay this. They cannot do anything or touch them until this proceeding happens. So that's amazing. When you think about, like, our military has been under attack with this thing,

standing their ground. We're now looking at thousands now in the Air Force that we're looking at court marshals, looking at being docked pay, all sorts of issues. And this court is now saying every single one of you are now free to wait and see how your exemption works out. The Air Force can't do anything to you.

This is a massive, massive win right now. Yes, it is. So excited. I mean, you can feel it, right? With all the darkness in the world, we really are seeing a transition here. And all, like right underneath the Waxville Eye of Administration that's against all of these things. Yes.

I mean, it's phenomenal that we're able to achieve this. You look at the power of the courts and all that was happening as judges were being put in place that actually believed in the Constitution of the United States of America. It's really, truly excited. And we're showing a legal system that is providing a container for protection for the servicemen and women that provide protection to us. This is a beautiful win-win. So, very good. So let's talk about the vaccines just for a second.

because no segment would be complete without some vaccine news for me. So we're going to go right into the boosters. We're talking third, fourth, fifth boosters. We've been covering this. But let's look at one of the voters. We have Dr. Paul Offutt. He's on the Verbeck Committee. He's voted for vaccines.

He's voted for the boosters. But let's listen to what he had to say about the recent boosters for the Omicron variant, which is the variant that is dominant right now going through its several variations of its variant. Here's what he had to say in an interview recently. Normally you get the EUA submission from the company, is 85 to 100 pages long. And then you get the FDA's review of all those data. It really is hardening. I mean, it is a very thorough review. Not here. Here it was 22 pages from the FDA, which included a half a page on Pfizer's data and a half a page on Modernist data. You could get that from the

press release. In fact, it was no more detailed, frankly, than the press release. So I just thought the question we're being asked is, in the end, always, is do the benefits outweigh the risks, even though the risks are generally small and sometimes unknown, that's always the question. Do the benefits of this vaccine outweigh the risks? I didn't see the benefits. I was surprised, actually, frankly, that of the 21 voting members, 19 voted yes, because I just didn't see the evidence for that. And we'll see how this plays out. I mean, this was something that I think that was desired by this administration.

I could be wrong. But the way that this, the other thing that was odd about this meeting was that we're an advice. Committee. We're being asked for our advice. So normally what happens is they just present the data. Here's the data. What's your advice? And people can ignore our advice. I mean, I'm in academic medicine. People ignore my advice all the time. But make the best advice. So here on the other hand, they had somebody from the WHO, Contra Suburale, who presented their opinion about this. And their opinion was they thought this was a good idea. And then you had the FDA presenting where they also had an opinion. That's unusual.

And then the next day, you know, you read a public health announcement from the, a press release from HHS Health and Human Services that says that the government has decided to purchase at least 105 million doses from Pfizer with up to 300 million doses. It was a little unclear from that press release, but they mentioned that we had just made this decision the day before. So you just sort of felt like the fix was in a little bit here. Maybe that's not the right phrase. But it was something that they wanted. And I felt like we were being led here with a critical lack of information. So we'll see how this way about. But I like this.

You know, this is, I mean, this is a, remember Paul in the early days of the pandemic when we were talking about the possibility of a vaccine happening in a year. And you and I were both skeptical. And part of the skepticism was we were worried that it was going to get kind of steamrolled through in a politicized way that was going to sacrifice the integrity of the process of review, the science, and potentially vaccine uptake across other vaccines if you screw this one up. And there was concern that Trump was going to try to rush it through, et cetera. Then the vaccine happens. And now we're expressing concern that, well, it just seems like it doesn't matter what politicians in office. There's always some kind of agenda. And there's always a concern that is it influencing how we actually process these FDA

type strategies? And everything you said is, so let me just recap. cap a little bit. Number one, they're looking at just neutralizing antibody levels in a way that doesn't even really quite take into account the control group, the way you pointed out. The idea that, okay, so it makes 1.75 the levels of neutralizing antibodies, but so did Moderna relative to Pfizer in the early days. And that did not translate into a nearly 2x fold improvement in prevention of severe disease or even infection. So these numbers do not necessarily correlate to efficacy. We're asking now for a logistic shift where potentially billions of dollars are at stake to transform a vaccine from the ancestral strain to a new

bivalent strain, including these Omicron-specific boosters, without clear and compelling evidence that it's actually going to improve the outcome we care about most, which is protection against severe disease. And yet, it seems like the burden of proof for FDA seems to be going down and down and down instead of being at a level that you're comfortable with. Is that an accurate summary of what you said? No, exactly. I mean, that is, it's so incredible. For people that maybe don't watch this show and don't really know who Paul Offit is, the Z-Dog, I can say this, that I am written about in Paul Offutt's books,

that I'm a dangerous person, I spread misinformation, all those things, he hates the high-wire he hates our nonprofit. And for the first time ever, I can officially say I am completely and totally aligned with Paul Offit and Z-Dog. So let me take the moment. Can I have the camera here? Dr. Paul Offit and Z-Daw. now that you are on our side and obviously are anti-bactors when it comes to voting in this booster, isn't it time we actually sit down since we have the common ground?

I knew you were going to be here and I want to personally all congratulate you because I know when you have this conversation, you know I'm going to play it on my show because it's exactly what I've been saying about all the other studies that you've approved and thought you were going along with. In fact, when you said that you were worried about how fast they were moving that COVID vaccine, you weren't very loud about that. You didn't stay very loud about it. I'd like to know, and maybe sit down on the stage sometime. They explained to me how you got comfortable with how fast that vaccine's rolled out and how you got comfortable with them erasing the control group. Like, let's have that conversation.

And then how do you discount all the deaths and injury and everything we're seeing in bears when the only thing we've ever known about bears is it's underreported, not overreported. Those are just a couple of questions. You can prepare for them. But whenever you're ready to have the honest conversation that you're clearly now appear to be ready to have, let's do this. Yeah, Adele. Several people, besides those two, experts from all around the world, were very worried about the effectiveness of these boosters, talking immune exhaustion, talking,

you can't keep boosting. So now we have ABC News, again, sounding like the high wire, because we've covered these studies. Check out this headline, ABC News, COVID boosters might be less than 20% effective after a few months. Study, this is against an Amacron variant. But let's finish off here with two studies. Very important studies. And these are studies if you're watching. You can take these. to your representatives and show them to them, this will make change happen. This is out of the UK. This is a study title.

Increasing SARS-CoV-2 cases, hospitalizations, and deaths among the vaccinated elderly populations during the Omicron variant surge in the UK. This is almost a year's monitoring. Remember the elderly population is why we rolled these vaccines out in the first place. We were supposed to be protecting.

Protect the elderly. So this is what they say. This is what they've came to their conclusion. The vaccine effectiveness for the third dose was in negative since December. 20, 2021. Let me just make that clear to people. A negative effectiveness means it is increasing your risk of getting sick with COVID.

Increasing your risk. Increasing your risk. Getting this vaccine and this booster is increasing your risk of being sick with COVID. Yes. And we're finding this in the studies now. This is in the studies. They go on to say with a significantly increased proportion of SARS-CoV-2 cases, hospitalizations and deaths among the vaccinated.

A decreased proportion of cases, hospitalizations and deaths among the unvaccinated. vaccinated, and it caused them to conclude the following. There is no discernible vaccine effectiveness among 18 and older years of age, vaccinated third dose population since the beginning of the Omicron Variant Surge. They go on to say, the increased cases with significantly increased hospitalizations and death among the elderly population during the Omicron Variant Surge underscores the need to prevent infections in the elderly, irrespective of vaccination status with uniform screening protocols and protective measures. This is Dr. Peter McCullough 101. Early protocols, whether you have the vaccine or not, get those early protocols. And that's what they're saying. Well, then that's

some of the conversation we've got coming up with, certainly Dr. Pierre Cori, Richard Erso, Dr. Robert Malone, just right around the corner. There's a travesty. There's been a crime that's happened here. I'm giving a talk tomorrow on Friday, 9th, 3rd, the morning, the COVID crimes. This is huge. And it's what we said, right? We said this. You're not going to be able to hide this. In the end, the truth will come out. You cannot rush products on the market the way they just did. And I've said it from the beginning. If this COVID vaccine doesn't kill us, this approach to medicine eventually will. We cannot keep producing products that the pharmaceutical industry pays out billions of dollars for killing us all the time from lying about safety.

Well, now they're not going to do any safety trials. They're just going to then use emergency use authorization to force everybody to take it. If we continue down that path, there is no way we are here for another 10 to 20 years. We're going to wipe ourselves out. out with this product or another one in the future. Right. And the conversation is two directions. We have the vaccine and we have natural immunity. So listen to this study. This is out of Qatar. Qatar has had amazing data collection through this COVID pandemic and now the pandemic's over. This is the study title, duration of immune protection of SARS-CoV-2 natural infection against reinfection in Qatar. So they looked at their databases and they said this, effectiveness of primary

infection against severe critical or fatal COVID-19 reinfection was. 7.3% irrespective of the variance of primary infection or reinfection with no evidence of waning. Wow. Similar results were found in subgroups analysis for those 50 and over years of age, period. Naturally infected, naturally immune, the far secure immune system, which is what you would have heard from day one on the highway. You heard it before there was a COVID pandemic. You heard it all the way through, and now the jig is up. We're right.

they're wrong. It sucks to be them. Jevary. Thank you. All right. Thank you so much. Thank you. So, you know, the high wire is not like a lot of news programs you're used to. We don't have sponsors. In fact, I've done that on purpose. I don't even take in vitamin companies or water treatment companies. Because in the end, my experience in television working at CBS is if you have sponsors, eventually they're going to have a problem with something you want to report on. and I'm going to get a call and say, Del, you know, we're a vitamin company. We really don't like you to talk about ivermectin.

That's a drug. That's not going to happen on the high wire. I don't care. Everyone is allowed their perspective. But what we wanted here, the dream of the high wire, was to have a show that is not controlled by anybody, that we get to ask any question of any issue we see anywhere in the world. And we're going to get the answers the best way we know how, which is going to the experts, and not just taking their word for it, by the way, but asking to see their evidence, their studies.

We will read them. and we will show them to you. The transparency of the high wire is like no other show. And so when the New York Times is writing about us or the Washington Post is interviewing me and say, what do you say about the misinformation you're spreading? I say, you know what? I've won lawsuits against government health agencies, FDA, CDC,

health and human services. Try to do that with misinformation. We're winning because we're right. And by the way, why don't you show me your work? Show me the studies you're talking about. Don't tell me your job is to quote experts. Our job is to go beyond the experts. Our job is to get to the facts.

And if you are watching the Highwire, all you have to do in order to get the facts in your hands is to simply just sign up to our newsletter. Totally free. I'm not going to charge you. You just sign up to thehighwire.com and then just give us your email because on Monday after this show, this week, you will see all of the evidence, all the studies Jeffrey was just talking about. They'll be in your hands because I don't want you to leave Sanjay Gupta, who you used to bow down to and say, now I do whatever Del Bigfee has to say.

That's not how this works. I want you to read the evidence. This is not a show that's trying to tell you what to think. We're trying to show you how to think. Where you find your science. You should be making your own decisions for yourself. You can only do that when the evidence is in your hands, and that's what the high wire is all about.

We call it the high wire protocol, which is we put all of our science and evidence in your hands. I want you to challenge me. I want you to see if I'm cherry-picking the studies we're talking about. And ask yourself, is any other news network doing that in the world that you're listening to? No. How much is your cable bill? How much are you funding those news organizations to lie to you?

And then watch that all of their sponsors keep lying to you. Do you really think your news agency is going to tell you the truth about a vaccine when the 70% of the money funding that news agency, funding that news anchor is coming in from Pfizer, from Moderna, from Sinofia Ventus? There is a different way to do this. And this is what the highway is all about. And all of you that have been sponsoring us, that have been making this possible, whether your small donations or your larger donations, this is an experiment that's working. We've gone from thousands of people watching

We've started six years ago To now more than 6 million people Tuning in every week Checking out our website Because you know the truth When you hear it, tell your friends And for all of you out there That have been sponsoring, I want to thank you

Because you have made the stream possible But for all of you that are sitting and watching And saying, you know, I love the show every week It's amazing how much evidence I get It's amazing how much work you guys do And the fact that I get to, you know, I'm watching you fund lawsuits They're making a difference in the world keeping kids from being injected with products

were never properly safety tested. Instead of sitting and watching that, become an active participant in the world. We need you now. Feel what it feels like to say, you know what? I help make that possible. And whether it's us or somebody else,

start donating to those people that are trying to fight for your life in your world and your children. If you want to do that, if you want to be a part of this amazing experiment going on here with the informed consent action network in the Highwire, just right now.

Go to the website you're watching the Highwire. dot com, click on donate. We'd love it if you become a recurring donor, whether it's a cup of coffee every week for six bucks, you believe coffee is $6 now, you know, or a bottle of water, $10 a month. You know, give what you can, become a recurring donor because you make all of this possible so that we can continue to wake up the world because if we don't wake them up in time, I guarantee you these freaks that are out there, they're trying to take over our world and hand us transhumanism and destroy our crops and destroy our crops and destroy, our food, they'll get away with it.

We need everybody, and that's what the Highwire is all about. And you've been watching it. You've been watching what's happened over the years and the work that we've done. You've been watching all the experts that sit at this table with me because they've realized this is the one place they get to tell the whole

truth and nothing but the truth. And it's been looking a lot like this. The Inform Consent Action Network, you know them as I can. The High Wire and I fighting on your behalf. The High Wire, you know Del Bigtree. Thank you to all the individuals

who are watching on the High Wire across the world. Without further ado from the High Wire, friend of mine, a friend of yours, Mr. Del Bigtree. We did it! Here we are. Present and accounted for.

You were at the Doctor's show. We were being forbidden to talk about what you were seeing and what you knew needed to be talked about. So you went out and created the high wire. Wherever you are out there in the world. How about we all step out onto the high wire? When the whole pandemic started, this was really where I got my knowledge from.

I saw all the scientists, all the doctors. Religiously, every Thursday, we need that encouragement from each other. You allowed a lot of us to take that dive into the science and really get immersed in it. So thank you. This is why I love watching your show. This is why I love watching you. It's a comprehensive overview, but it's also building. and supported with detail and with evidence.

CNN and Anderson Cooper has been reaching out to us and all the other mainstream guys. But I need to share my side of the story and I know that there's only one person who's going to do it right and that's Del Big Tree. You guys are the mainstream media now. They're done and dead. It's over.

The media like the Highwire and Del Big Tree not only reporting the truth every week but also fighting in court for justice. I think what we have in common is the passion for the truth. right and i see you as somebody who's investigating you know what are the real facts and data you are one of the beacons for all of us when things get really dark i turn on the eyewear lifts me back up every time del your confidence is so inspiring thank you for doing all that you do fighting the good fight del i really appreciate your hard work and you team thank you for giving us a voice i appreciate

you so much it's an honor to be here thank you what can we create when we connect together it's been with you too brother thank you for your continued your continued support in your friendship deli. We're just grateful for the chance to talk to you and for your support and interest in our latest declaration. It's great to be on your show and thank you for everything you've been doing in terms of providing the truth to people regarding COVID and the vaccines. You've been in a war zone of your own.

It's a really lethal war zone, right? When you get into the realm of big farmer and all that money, that is at stake there, all the power players. This is a war for survival, survival of the soul of humanity. Ultimately, it's going to have to take people ready to sacrifice everything in order to bring the truth to the world. I've been one of the silent people with injured children who have hidden behind you, rooting you on for years, and it's time that I stand beside you. We're standing up and we're fighting for you. We're fighting for those who cannot fight for themselves. That is what the truth is all about.

That is what being alive is all about. And that's what the high wire is about. I'll see you next week. accident, I was on somebody else's podcast, the guy running the studio there said, you should do your own show. So we started in closet, and now we find ourselves in this amazing event. And to just put the icing on the cake, I find myself with some of the biggest heroes in the world today, especially when it comes to medical freedom and the discussion about what just happened to us during this pandemic. It's my honor to be joined right now by Dr. Richard Hursso, Dr. Robert Malone, and Dr. Pierre

Corey, everybody, you don't know who these guys are. You better get on it right away. All right. So I want to just start out very quickly. For those who don't know who you guys are, Dr. Richard or so really quickly, just when it comes to COVID and the background and what's here, you know, what got you into this conversation? Well, I had a background in drug development.

And back in March of 2020, could see quite clearly that we could attack the inflammation, attack the blood clotting, attack the respiratory demise, even if we didn't have something to attack the virus with. And I found the novel thing about the virus was the approach of the government. That was the novel thing. It was the first time in history that they said there was no early treatment, and I felt like I had to speak out. I've treated 2,100 patients, and that was the start of it. Fantastic. Dr. Pierre, Corey, somewhat similar. You really got into this thought of treatments, right? And, you know, we don't have the video with us. I'll be playing it during my talk tomorrow, but you got up in front of the Congress and you said, there is a drug that is a wonder

drug for treating this ivermectin. What puts you in that position? Yeah, well, when the pandemic started, you know, I'm a pulmonary and critical care position. And in the beginning, it was the ICUs that were filling and overloaded. We knew that this was coming. And we just dug deep. We studied. We formed an organization called the frontline COVID-19 Critical Care Alliance. And we just continued to study, therapeutics, and over time, we discovered, we identified this really powerful data signal around Ivermectin, and we knew it was one of the most inexpensive and most widely available drugs in the world, and it presented itself as a solution to the pandemic. And like Dr. Erso said, when we came out with that information, we were met with attacks,

dismissal, delegitimizing, and we didn't know that we had launched ourselves into a decades-long war by the pharmaceutical industry on repurposed drugs. Wow. Well, thank you for your work. Thanks for being here. Dr. Robert Malone, you know, we've had an opportunity to be on several stages together. We were in Bath, England, and it's just sort of a

funny story. I was talking to Brett Weinstein, who was remarking the fact that I was in this fight before COVID came along and all of this, and he says, Del, I think you'd have to recalibrate. You have to really come to terms with what you've won and who you've won, look around you, and in the room was you,

you're Vanne Bosch, a couple other people. And he said, you know, did you really expect these people to be on your side? And I said at first, you know what, I did. I knew that the moment they started vaccinating, you know, doctors and not just children, that those doctors would start to say, you know what, I don't feel so good. Or this thing doesn't seem to be working. Or I'm seeing what's happening to adults in the ER. And I said to him, I knew that there was going to be doctors here.

But then I caught myself and I said, you know what? But I did not expect that the inventor of the vaccine that everyone would be using would be on our team. And yet, here you are. Inventor of, you know, the sort of the COVID vaccine technology that's being used, the MRNA technology. What puts you here really? So, as you know, Del, I've spent my whole career focused on discovery research, drug development, clinical research, biodefense, vaccines. I've been at the tip of the spear of multiple outbreaks. And in this case, what I've seen is to shock me all the way through. I got a call. early from Wuhan saying I need to get my government associated team spun up. We were working

for a defense threat reduction agency to address this virus. I made a threat assessment and determined that the best response was going to be what these two gentlemen have done, which is repurposed drugs. We don't roll out of repurpose drugs. We got going on it. We have some of our own that we've tried to prosecute. But then this whole vaccine agenda came in and I saw that the The technology that I had worked so hard on when I was a young man was being perverted, and that the clinical research enterprise and the norms of ethical research, as the name of your whole organization, informed consent, was being destroyed and just totally disregarded. And I had to speak up.

And it's a bit an interesting journey, I think, for all of us. I think we've learned things that we probably would rather not have known. But, you know, again, the metaphor, you're in a dark room. You think that everything is okay. You back into the light and suddenly you see things and you can never unsee them. And then you have a choice. Are you going to behave ethically? Are you going to say this isn't right?

Are you going to say this has to stop? Are you going to call people out for what they're doing? Are you just going to shut up, take your, you know, a little bit of gold and go into the corner and go be quiet? And that seems to be what a lot of our peers have done. I am so sorry to report that, but it's the case. I mean, you've got to call it like it is. And some of us have said, damn it, we're going to stand up and say no. So look, we're going to be doing a panel here right at the conference in just about an hour,

so I don't want to wear you all out. And for those that are maybe being introduced to you right now, go back and watch other shows. I want to deal with some of the current events and the issues. We know where you come from. The first question I have, because all of you are involved in this repurpose drug situation. In fact, your license is currently under review for the statements you've made about Ivermectin, the success of it, things like that. And other doctors have been on our show are suffering the same issue. Attack for simply saying there are products that are working.

And so I want to ask you guys, and this has been, you know, an area of research, we're the Department of Defense. I mean, you're involved with the government that seem to use to care. Are there drugs available to deal with things? But right now, Paxlolobin. Paxilovid seems to be the drug they accept, right? No on hydroxychloroquine, no on ivermectin, but Paxlobit, yet Paxilobit were seeing headlines about this sort of bounceback problem.

I think even Fauci himself suffered from using Pax Lovin. Here it is. Fauci says he had Pax Lovet. and the rebound had worse symptoms. So we're giving out a drug. It's the only drug we've approved, and yet I don't remember people talking about after the use of Ivermectin having a bounce back.

So first of all, is Paxilovid even as good as Ivermectin? When you weigh this out, when you look at these drugs, is there a place for Paxlovid? And where does it sit in where you think the quality of the product is compared to Ivermectin, which would be so much cheaper and more readily available? Well, you know, like Dr. Malone just said, just said, the things that I've learned about the pharmaceutical industry and how they

essentially manipulate data, that's been well described for decades. So when Paxilovic came out with this 90 or 88% reduction in hospitalization, that's by definition inflated. That's number one problem with it. Number two, its main mechanism of action is the same as one of the mechanisms of Ivermectin, and Ivermenectin is considered to be a stronger protease inhibitor. Okay. I've never used Paxloid.

I don't want to use Paxlova. It's extremely expensive. It has more drug interactions with more classes of medication than any medicine I've used. It has side-effective other drugs. You cannot use it with dozens of other drugs. And so it has a limited utility. And then there's this rebound. I've never seen rebound with ivermectin or hydroxychloroquine.

I put my patients on. They take it until they're recovered. They're done. There's no rebound. And so I just cannot bring myself to use a novel, barely tested, high-cost, pharmaceutical drug. It has to stop. And as a physician, I'm not going to be played anymore. You know, I know how to treat this disease, and I don't need Pfizer to tell me how to do it. I've already, like, Dr. Ersoe got many hundreds of patients through this without any problems,

and I'm not going to change what I'm doing. Dr. Urso, what's the gene? Why PACs-Lob? Why don't you get approved? Yeah, that's a great question. So what you're seeing here is, this is a protease inhibitor. There's many protease inhibitors that are generic, Kaletcher being one of them. They never, tested it early. It does the same thing as Pierre just said as as Ivermectin does, which has about 22 different mechanisms of action. What we're seeing now with Paxlovit, it's not, this is not great science. They put it out there because they make more money on this than a generic. It is literally almost a carbon copy of Kalitra. So that's number one. Number two, so number two,

we are now seeing mutants occur from Paxlovit treatment. We are see in mutations. Viruses, like the viruses mutations. It is driving mutations. That paper is out this week. It is part of the reason we're getting mutations because it's a one-trick pony. The good thing about the multi-drug cocktail is, like our natural immune system, it hits it from multiple angles. The multi-drug cocktails that we've been using hits from many different angles, and

that's why we've had so much success. So this is a strategy that is going to lead to more and more problems that we've already had, which is driving more mutations. driving more disease. Isn't the problem really that the pharmaceutical industry now seems to have its hooks into all of our regulatory agencies, which means that repurpose drugs,

drugs that are now available, they're cheap that could work, that even Merck will come out against its own drug that it created it because it wants to sell its new one. So we literally seem to be, it's like Raiders of the Lost Ark. You can find the art, but it's no good here.

We're going to stick it in a Baltimore where no one will ever see it again. They're getting rid of all of these drugs that are probably better just because they're not going to make the billions of dollars off. Is that what's driving this whole thing? So that's exactly what I've learned in horrifying detail, right? We have thousands of FDA-approved drugs with known mechanisms of action, known safety profiles. They're all on the shelf.

That's what Dr. Malone tried to do when this broke out. Look at what we have available and deploy it. It is the Achilles heel of the pharmaceutical industry. It completely threatens their entire business model. If we keep looking at the generic drug stockpile to treat disease, they have no profit-making ability. They are terrified by that, and they employ massive global disinformation campaigns to destroy knowledge of efficacy of generic drugs. Believe me, I've been the target of that, and it doesn't stop. And it's not new to COVID.

It's the scope and the scale, which exceeds anything before. They've been doing it on oncology and cancer treatments, cardiovascular treatments, diabetes, and it's going to be. to continue, but I really believe their overreach here, the depraved and rapacious overreach has exposed them, just like Dr. Malone taught. I hope this exposure is known to society, and we build some structures to protect ourselves against these pharmaceutical communities. I wouldn't say they're trying to kill us. They don't care that we die as long as the money comes in. They do not care. Brilliant. Good. All right, I want to get into the backseat a little bit. One of the issues we

have, I think, with the fact, I think the attack upon hydroxychloroquine, The attack upon Ibermectin was because in order to get an emergency use authorization to basically bail out a safety trial early so that we didn't see the long-term effects of a product that was basically killing or leading to real illness in the animal trials prior to this moment. In order to not see any of that, we had to get an emergency use authorization. At least this is my perspective. And it says right there in the FDA, in order to get an EUA, emergency use authorization, there can be no other available treatment that achieves.

the goal of getting people through the illness and protecting them. And so we were told the only way out of this was going to be a vaccine. It was going to be a miracle vaccine. As soon as it came out, it's 95% effective. Everybody go out and get it to protect your neighbors. You're going to protect everyone around you. And if you don't decide to protect your neighbors, then you're a bad person. You should be attacked.

You should be turned into the authorities. It literally became like a Nazi witch hunt here in the United States of America and around the world. But just last week, an incredible. exchange with Deborah Birx, who was really the voice of that. I think behind her was probably Tony Boucher, but Deborah Berks was the one out telling us, this vaccine is going to be amazing. We all got to wait for it. Anytime Donald Trump, the president of the time, said he liked the drugs, they all came out against it. But listen to what she just said. I want you to listen to this for a minute. This is, I believe, a congressional hearing, or maybe in the Senate hearing.

Take a look at this. You're an expert. You were on the task for you were part of this effort when you were in the previous administration, and you're saying in this administration that you can't rule out the fact that our government was lying to us when they told us the vaccinated could not get the virus? I don't know about their discussions that they had in the task force. So I can't tell you that. I can tell you as a family member who had individuals that were susceptible, of course we got everybody vaccinated. But we still use layered protection during surges because I knew potentially the vaccine immunity would wane like natural immunity waned. And there was evidence that every four months reinfection was occurring in South Africa.

Wow. When the government told us that the vaccinated couldn't transmit it, was that a lie or was that a guess? Or is it the same answer? I think it was hope that the vaccine would work in that way. And that's why I think scientists and public health leaders always have to be at the table, being very clear what we know and what we don't know. This is important for the country to know. So when I asked the question, when the government told us that the vaccinated couldn't get it, and I ask you if it was a guess or a lie, you said you don't know. you think it was hope. So what we do know is it wasn't the truth. So they were either guessing, lying, or hoping, and communicating that information to the citizens of this country. I think they were hoping,

but you should know in those original phase three trials that were done in this country, that we only measured for symptomatic disease. So we weren't proactively testing everybody in those trials to see if they got infected with mild or asymptomatic. disease. And so people had to present within the clinical trials. So we never had the data that it was going to protect against asymptomatic infection. I'm just struck with the irony. We got government agencies guessing, hoping, or lying with the

information they're presenting to the American people. And this is the same administration that wants to set up the disinformation governance board and wants to talk about misinformation, And they're the biggest purveyors of misinformation, false information, hopeful information, but not accurate and true information, which is, again, the frustration I think so many of the folks I get the privilege of representing have shared with me. What she's admitting here, right? And, you know, we could forgive it. We could forgive it if they had been, you know, forthcoming the entire time saying we're doing the best we can. We want all hands on depth.

We want to hear from Robert Malone or so. up here, Corey, you got a drug out that this seems to be working. Let's all get together and see what's the best way forward. But they didn't do that. What they said is you need to have your license revoked if you decide to question anything we're doing. So even though he was like, look, we didn't know. We were doing the best we could. No, no, you were much worse than that.

While you didn't know, you attacked those that maybe did know, that did have ways forward, that did have answers. And so now you don't get to say, oh, well, you know, we never test to see if it would go beyond just stopping symptoms, that whether it would actually stop infection. But you made everyone in the country and around the world take this to protect each other, which was the lie. It was never going to protect my neighbors.

In fact, it's going to create a bigger issue, is it not? So I want to say a couple things about this. They have been lying and lying and lying and lying. There is multiple layers of fraud going on. What Debbie has just disclosed in this video, Bax's testimony she gave previously saying that all they had was hope. And yet they're trying to get away with the fact that there were multiple misrepresentations that this vaccine could get us to herd immunity. We've all seen the clips.

We've all heard Dr. Fauci and his ratcheting down about that. But it's deeper than this, Del. You mentioned some key things, and one of them was the statement about the emergency use authorization. And in the recent EUA renewals, I want to come. I kind of drill in on this just a little bit. I called the FDA, and I said, is the reason why you're suppressing these alternative treatments, these repurposed drugs,

because of the provisions of the EUA that there cannot be an alternative medicine? And they flat out lied to me. They said, absolutely not. That's not the case, okay? That was a lie, one of so many lies. And now what I saw in the latest EUA is Peter Mark's head of Sieber,

had to certify even now that there are no alternative treatments available, otherwise the EUA would fail. They are still swearing. He is signing off in a statement certifying to the federal government that there are no alternative treatments. Despite all of the monoclonal antibodies, all the repurposed drugs, Paxlovich. I mean, it is a flat-out lie.

They keep coming. The lies keep coming. They don't stop. They don't care. The whole thing is profound, and it illustrates how deeply corrupt this entire system is, how deeply captured it is by the pharmaceutical industry. And it's beyond just the FDA and the CDC. We have a problem. We have a deep problem, as you know well, and you've been at the tip of the spear on it. And that is that the administrative state in this government is captured by big business. And in HHS, it is captured by big pharma. In USDA, it is captured by big ag. In aviation, it's captured by Boeing.

It's the same thing over and over and over again. So what we're left with, and I want to sort of bring this to a close, we've got to prepare to go and get on the stage over there. but you came down to speak to the state capital in Texas just recently. And so we grabbed a couple of videos. I don't know if we'll get to all, but I just want to point out that what now Deborah Berks is admitting is that it doesn't stop infection. I think Fauci just had a quote just recently saying,

yeah, it just didn't turn out to be what we had hoped it would be similarly. So if it's not stopping infection, all of these people that are vaccinated, you know, it's a leaky vaccine. It's been abandoned Bosch who's been on the show. So they are carrying this virus. It has the ability to mutate. You address some of this, and I want to get to it. But here's what you said at the Texas State Capitol.

Administration of leaky vaccines is another contributor. Largely unable to block infection, replication, and spread of the virus may contribute to the evolution that we're seeing with Omicron. There is evidence, this is key. There is evidence that infection of individuals who are immunologically impaired or compromised, in other words, those with immunodeficiencies. and not just talking about AIDS. There's a lot of different kinds of immune deficiencies,

such as people have. We were talking about organ transplantation and cancer treatments. These people may often become chronically infected with Omicron, and these appear, according to the science, the latest publications to be the individuals that are disproportionately driving the development of the escape mutants. So I've been wrong. Gert von Dombach has been wrong.

It's not happening necessarily in all of us because we've been vaccinated or have been previously infected. It appears that the evolution is happening in people who are immunocompromised in some way so that they become chronically infected with or reinfected with homicron. I think this is a very important conversation because we are starting to see an awakening here. We're seeing science saying, look, the vaccine isn't working. and we are seeing mutations that are now getting around the vaccine. Totally escaping. Omicron shocked us.

Moving into BA 4 and 5, there's fear of those things. We had Gereband & Bosch predicting that this vaccine was going to pressure the virus. But you said something there, and I want to get to it, and for people that have been watching our show, they'll know what we're talking about. If not, this is new to you, you're going to have to go back. But this idea of escape mutants, it's being blamed on the unvaccine. They did it from the beginning. And when I see an article that will still say,

Now, the vaccine clearly isn't working. We're going to need new vaccines, and maybe we'll always have to learn to live with it. And it's all the fault of the unvaccinated. When, as we just saw in this study that just came out of guitar, that ultimately they naturally immune. Once you've been naturally effective, you're carrying a far more robust protection. You're the only person, as far as I'm concerned, that can actually achieve herd immunity here. And perhaps, if, you know, the vaccine had been used on those that were vulnerable, but let the rest of us that were healthy to have achieved natural immunity, this virus might have left.

us, but we're stuck with it because of a leaky vaccine. But you're saying here was wrong in a way that it's maybe not the vaccinated that are creating these mutations or that pressure, but it's more in the immune suppressed. Can you tell me a little bit more about this? Because this is sort of breaking information. So this is what the latest literature is showing. And just because it's out in one or two papers doesn't mean it's necessarily true. I mean that's the nature of science. It's this back and forth. But the latest data suggests if you track, and it's much like what happens with the evolution of HIV in the AIDS or HIV-infected patients, they become chronically infected. What we're seeing is in the immunosuppressed, they become chronically

infected, and those are the people that seem to be generating the escape unions. Now here's the kicker, okay. The vaccines through this process of immune imprinting, the multiply jam, are developing a relative immunodeficiency in both B&T responses against Omicron. It is the highly vaccinated that are getting repeatedly infected by Omicron and chronically infected by Omicron. And you as clinicians, you're seeing it. You know that's what's happening. The data from all over the world are showing it.

And by the way, these are the people, the highly vaccinated, that are infected with Omicron, particularly the latest variants, that are in the hospital. and unfortunately are dying at a disproportionately high rate. But these are the folks that are generating the new waves of escapings and the madness, the madness. We have now bought us, the United States government, all of us. We've essentially borrowed money to pay Pfizer $3.2 billion for making a trivalent vaccine with Wuhan, VA4, and VA5,

that we're going to deploy without any clinical trials. They haven't even made it yet. We've already bought it. And even Paul Offent, who has been a zealot for this product, is saying this is just gone to step. It's crazy. And again, I could not, if I wanted to, I could not design a vaccine more likely to drive immune imprinting

in these problems other than the one that they are specifically going to try to force us all to get vaccinated with right before the, election for some reason. Immune imprinting, this is an issue that you've been writing, people should see your substack, by the way, really great information. Sort of, I take it as, you know, another way of talking about original antigenic sin. So for people that don't understand this, I also talk about specific immunity. If you remember the football analogy, but essentially, if you vaccinate for a specific spike

protein, then you take away this broad-based immunity you would have had, had your body seen every protein on this virus naturally. you would have had, you know, immunity to all those different proteins. So it's going to take a much bigger shift in that virus. And it drives a bias. Your immune system gets driven like a laser at this one thing, and it biases its ability to respond to anything else that's related to it. And Omicron, evolutionarily, it's not because it's so smart,

but evolution is powerful stuff. Omicron has adapted to escape exactly. that type of focused immune response. And by further vaccinating with Wuhan 1, totally outdated, plus BA4 already gone, VA5, we already

know from the South African data, it's already crashing. It's going to be gone by November more likely than not, except for these people that are chronically infected. And then they're going to jab all of us with that. Well, that's going to make it even harder for our immune systems to respond to whatever comes next. It is

madness. When You guys, Dr. Corey, you must sit here and thinking, look, the vaccine is the hill that you're dying on here. It's always been on the treatments that were available, right? Do you wake up at night thinking, my God, if they had just listened to me, I got in front of the Senate. I mean, I was there. I told him we had a drug that could have saved at least half the lives. In fact, you know, I'm going to be talking a little bit about Andrew Hill and the work that you guys all did. 75% reduction, honestly, when you used appropriately in deaths and severe issues.

do you just ask yourself, do you picture where would the world be had we just said, hey, Pierre, awesome work, man. We're going to continue that work. I want to give the world Ivermectin. We would not be here today. This would have been over a long time ago. We would have deployed early treatments, combination therapies like Dr. Erso said, highly effective, cheap, safe, available.

Every country would have had access to it. The fear mongering would have stopped. And this relentless push for novel, barely tested, toxic vaccines would not have been triggered. Like you said, with the EUA, we would not have pursued that obsessive path, that monolithic path down this vaccine pathway for a rapidly mutating coronavirus. A virus we've never had a successful vaccine from. It was illogical from the beginning.

Right. We are now, they have boxed us in, bless their hearts. They soon are going to have no choice other than to turn to you guys in early treatment. The vaccines are not working. They're driving it even further. And the only solution left, in my opinion, is to deploy widespread early treatment as soon as possible to shut this down. And we've got to stop the vaccine. Our group made that clear, unambiguous statement.

We're done. Do not vaccinate your children. There is no sense in this. And it is time to withdraw these vaccines in our opinion. from the man who invented the technology being used as vaccines. I think we should take that. Doctor or so early on you got involved in this, and you didn't just step out to make a difference.

You didn't just save over 2,000 patients' lives. You reached out to other doctors and scientists around you. Now you have the Global COVID Summit. You have 17,000 doctors. So you guys are now just not representing. You're not out here alone. 17,000 doctors across the world, we're all stepping up and saying,

there is a better way forward. We can never do this again. And what is the importance now, the medical community that are being silent, that are sitting in these ERs and watching people pour through the doors, you know, getting, you know, COVID the third time, desperately sick. Paxloven isn't working. The vaccine's a disaster. You know, what is it you hope to achieve in this work you've done to bring all these doctors together around the world? That's a great summary, Del. What I think is really apropos here is we're at Freedom Fest. What we've seen is regulatory capture of the government, regulatory capture of our journals, regulatory capture of physicians, regular capture all along every single thing that we took for granted was free, is not free, it's actually captured. And so we're stuck with having to basically go on our own.

And Dr. Malone and Pierre are co-founders of the Global COVID Summit. And basically we came together to try to create an organization. that other physicians could get behind, like the FLCCC, and say, hey, we're not alone. We're going to stand together. The science and the data is overwhelming. The reason we are together is the science and data is overwhelming. It's all risk, no reward, and virtually every age group right now, we need to stop this vaccine. All right.

I'm going to throw a little bit of curveball at you just to sort of sum this all up. You put out a great article about fear porn. And we're all at risk of this, right? I've talked about geared band and Boston, very scary stuff. BA 4 and 5, we're going to get into this, into the panel coming up, is not turning out to be the boogeyman that maybe we were worried about. There's a slight uptick, but deaths aren't going through the roof. It doesn't look to be as bad as the original Amacron, all those things.

But this idea of where they, it just feels like the media, and under some sort of, you know, global takeover of our minds and our hearts keeps trying to scare the hell out of us. And, you know, in this case, it's been mostly about viruses and you got monkeypox now and all of these things. But there's something that came out of the bag in New York City this week that I think just takes this thing to a whole other level. And it's so shocking. And, you know, straight from the capital of fear porn, I'm not sure if you've seen this, but I'm going to ask you about, did you see this come across your social media channels?

So there's been a nuclear attack. Don't ask me how or why. Just know that the big one has hit. Okay, so what do we do? There are three important steps that I want you to remember. Step one, get inside fast. You, your friends, your family, get inside. And no, staying in the car is not an option.

You need to get into a building and move away from the windows. Step two, stay inside. Shut all doors in windows. Have a basement? Head there. If you don't have one, get as far into the middle of the building as possible. If you were outside after the blast, get clean immediately. Remove and bag all outer clothing to keep radioactive dust or ash away from your body. Step 3. Stay tuned. Follow media for more information.

Don't forget to sign up for Notify NYC for official alerts and updates. And don't go outside until officials say it's safe. All right, you've got this. I don't know if you guys have seen this in the first time, but we are looking at the first duck and cover video since 1952, I believe, here in the United States of America, out of nowhere. And I'm asking myself personally, okay, you lock this down. We seem to be all over that.

I don't think we're going to allow you to lock this down again over a virus. And now all of a sudden out of New York City, you know what you really need to be afraid of. You need to be afraid of a nuclear bomb going off where you're going to have to lock yourself in your house and do exactly what we did during COVID. Watch your TV, turn off the social media, and let mainstream media tell you what you get to do next to your life. What is going on here? Am I, am I overreacting? This is insane.

Not at all. It is insane. Not at all. We happen to be of a generation. I think you're a little younger. I think I missed that one. But I didn't. When I was a young school kid, we were trained in this.

We had a bomb shelter in Southern California. We were trained to get under our desks. And all of that is junk. It will not stop you from the effects of radiation. Okay, this is more weaponized fear. The weaponized fear is occurring. It is being promoted to control you. And it's also being promoted to support a business model.

Okay, the clicks, the fear, they drive revenue for the corporate media. And that's what we're up against. But it's fascinating that this is coming out, as you point out, from New York City, which has been the home of all of this again and again, that in Atlanta,

promoting this fear, this constant fear that seems to be closely tied to people with close connections to the administrative state and the intelligence community. And that includes CNN anchors.

Yeah. Yeah. When you watch this, Dr. Corey, what runs to your mind? It seems like just another maneuver. I mean, it's my impression that they've been releasing viruses to cause more fear. I mean, if you look at the origin of Omicron, that was not a variant of Delta. That was fundamentally different. And so there's a rational basis to suspect that was another released virus. Suddenly Monkeypox, one of the least transmissible viruses ever, is suddenly popping up in 31 countries around the world. New monkey pox. Now you're hearing whispers of Marburg, and now there's another. I'm wondering, they want us to get our attention off of these viruses because they're not working and off of the humanitarian catastrophe that was caused by the vaccines, and now we can worry and focus on something else.

But most important, listen to them. Stay tuned, listen to major media. They'll tell you what's going on and what to do. And I see this, I never looked at the world like this two years ago. I was a cover-to-covered New York Times reader. sorry I believed everything it said and I thought it was true that's one of my transformations but now I don't believe any of the narratives in fact most things I see as a narrative and that seems some new narrative to serve a purpose like Dr. Malone was pointing out Dr. Urso you know when we look at this I mean it seems insane yet it's happening

funding is going into this and I just asked myself they're planting this seed for some reason. I'm always amazed to see how they're coming at us. I mean, now we had the Russia-Ukraine war. It's hard to believe what they're saying because I think one of the things I've come to find is that most of what they're saying is probably not true. I'm not saying I know the truth, but I know the narrative is almost always false. And that's where my mind goes now. The narrative that they're pushing on is so hard is a false narrative. What's the true narrative? That can be a little more difficult. For us as scientists and as medical doctors, it's very easy to see through the lies. So I can't see through all the lies, but I can easily through the medical lies.

And so I've come to believe that almost everything we're getting is propaganda right now. And I'm a little bit like Pierre. I read the Wall Street Journal in New York Times cover to cover for years, unfortunately, probably brainwashed me. But in general, I think we're going to have more of that. We're going to see more of that. And that attack and collaborated effort by the media was actually the thing that drove this whole thing over and above any other pandemic.

It was they actually controlled the narrative. You have to wake up. You have to get informed. You have to think for yourself. The only way that you're going to protect yourself from this is you have to get information from multiple sources and you have to think for yourself.

Otherwise, you're going to be a picture. I want to thank you guys. We're about to do a panel. But you are truly heroes. You're putting it all in the line. You're risking your careers because it's what's right. You're standing for truth.

Nothing can be asked. Nothing more can be asked of any human being than to stand in the face of adversity and stand in the truth no matter how much you're ridiculed or persecuted and nobody represents that better than you three gentlemen. It's such an honor to know you and have you here today. Thank you for taking your time.

Thanks, gentlemen. All right. Well, what? You know the answer? We'll hit it on the stage over there. If you want to know what the answer is coming from Dr. Robert Malone, see us. We're going to be at 210 over on the main stage here at Freedom Fest.

This has been an amazing opportunity here at Freedom Fest. I want to say this, that there's many different ways that we see Heroes step forward. And here on the high wire, so much of it we've been representing the scientists and the doctors that have been telling us the truth from the beginning. While Deborah Birx and Tony Foucher were lying, these guys were there. The inventor of the MRNA vaccine was telling you, hold on a second. I may have invented this, but it's not being made the way that I dreamed that it could be, and we're going to have a problem here.

But what about sports? What about actors? What about people that we look to? I think something happened this week that was so powerful, someone that's been through so much adversity. I'm talking about Joachovic winning Wimbledon. I don't know if you're watching that this week. But here is the guy who has been under incredible attack, was literally under house arrest in Australia,

arguably the greatest tennis player, maybe of all time, certainly of this time, being denied the right to play in the tournaments and prove he's the greatest simply because he did not believe that he needed this vaccine. He'd already been infected. We now have studies that say that that's the case. So, I mean, first of all, to you, Novak Djokovic, you are a true hero for standing your green. ground for anyone that wants to question that, for anyone asking themselves, you know, what is at risk for me telling the truth? I want you to imagine if you were about to be, you could be the greatest of all times, and all of that could be held in jeopardy because you're sticking to the

truth instead of giving in. Look at this little piece of an interview because I think it's so powerful for all of us to hold inside of ourselves as we move into, I think, even more treacherous times ahead. I understand the consequences of my decision, and one of the consequences of my decision was not going to Australia and I was prepared not to go. And I understand that not being vaccinated today, I, you know, I'm unable to travel to most of the tournaments at the moment. And that's the price you're willing to pay? That is the price that I'm willing to pay. Ultimately, are you prepared to forego the chance to be the greatest player that ever picked up a racket, statistically,

because you feel so strongly about this jab? Yes, I do. But as things stand, if this means that you miss the French Open, is that a price you'd be willing to pay? Yes, that is the price that I'm willing to pay. And if it means that you miss Wimbledon this year, again, that's a price you're willing to pay? Yes. Why? Why?

Because the principles of decision-making on my body are more important than any title or anything else. We live in an incredible time because the forces that are unnatural, not of nature, but of man and of greed or upon us. But it is making us recognize how important reaching down to be the best of ourselves is. And those heroes that maybe would have been quiet, we wouldn't have known that a Novak Djokovic in his heart was a warrior for the truth if he had not been pressured in this way. And he has come under attack by virtually every news agency, shame on them. the end, he was right. And now, imagine here the United States of America, here at Freedom Fest, in the country that's supposed to be the bastion for freedom and liberty, people try to get across our borders to have what we have. Right now, we have a pile of bologna around

Wimbledon and around, you know, what Novak Djokovic. He is not going to be allowed to come to the United States of America to play in the U.S. Open here. Wimbledon champion Novak Joukvich is still not planning to get vaccinated, set to skip U.S. Open. Why? This is, I mean, I know this is just sports. It shouldn't matter that much. What difference does it make? It's just an athlete. But it shows how incredibly stupid this whole thing has become. We have a vaccine that clearly cannot stop infection. Fouching in everybody behind that pushed it on us is it admits that. That there's no stopping this infection. In fact, the only way to feel confident that you are safe right now in this world is if you were naturally infected and you have that more robust immunity that we're seeing in multiple studies, including the one we show you that just came out of. the Middle East. Now, guitar, and so we know that this is the case. Natural immunity is the only way forward. So Novak Djokovic is arguably the healthiest tennis player in the world today. And he's not going to be allowed in the United States of America because we have to be held under this fear porn of an emergency. We're still under emergency. We don't know what to do with this virus. The vaccine didn't work,

even though we promised you would. We took away your jobs. We didn't allow you to go anywhere near the drugs that could have saved your lives. and Novak Djokovic stands there as the living proof, the control group that said, not only am I still healthy, I'm still the greatest freaking tennis player alive and I'm beating everyone around me. And the only way they can be right is to censor him and keep him from playing. We've got to stop this insanity. We've got to stand up. We've got elections happening all over the world. We've got to make a difference.

We can't just come to conferences like here at Freedom Fest and say, boy, that felt really good and then quietly hide in our houses. We've got to go out and bring the truth to everyone we know. I don't know if you saw the interview with Matthias Desmond just a few weeks ago, a powerful interview about the brainwashing that's taken place. The hypnosis our friends and family members are under is real. But we've got to keep giving them doses of the truth. We cannot give up on them now. We've got to reach down into being our inner Jokevich and stand for what matters, not worried about what we might lose for telling the truth. And these guys that sat with me on the stage, not worried about their license, but recognizing what they should worry about

is the future of humanity. When we look at Australia and what happened with the Australia Open, which set this whole thing off with Djokovic, I want to share something and read something, I don't usually do this. But this came across, so this was texted to me last night. And this is it. The unvaccinated will be vindicated. This is, I can't read it. In the Venetian. or whatever that says. I don't know if this is the author. I'm not sure if we've fully nailed it down. It's a column that said to be written by Susan Dunham.

Maybe there's a Susan out there. I don't know how I'm going to be attacked. I will say this. I did not write this, but somebody did. Susan, if it's you, this should be holding down a place in every textbook in the world in the future. And I'm going to read to you what I think is one of the most eloquently stated statements about what we have just been through. and what we must all recognize is now the truth. And for those have you been watching the high wire,

this one's for you. Let this sink in. An opinion piece from a vaccinated Australian writer, is what it's called. If COVID was a battlefield, it would still be warm with the bodies of the unvaccinated. Thankfully, the mandates are letting up and both sides of the war stumble back to the new normal.

The unvaccinated are the heroes of the last two years, as they allowed us all to have a control group. group in the great experiment and highlight the shortcoming of COVID vaccines. The unvaccinated carry many battle scars and injuries as they are the people we tried to mentally break. Yet no one wants to talk about what we did to them and what they forced the science to unveil. We knew that the waning immunity of the fully vaccinated had the same risk profile as

others within society as the minority of the unvaccinated, yet we marked them for special persecution. You see, we said that they had not done the right thing for the greater good by handing their bodies and medical autonomy over to the state. Many of the so-called health experts and political leaders in Australia admitted the goal was to make life almost unlivable for the unvaccinated, which was multiplied many times by the collective mob, with a fight taken into workplaces, friendships, and family gatherings. Today, the hard truth is none of it was justified as we took a quick slide from righteousness to absolute cruelty. We might lay the blame on our leaders and health experts for the push,

but each individual within society must be held accountable for stepping into the well-laid-out trap. We did this despite knowing full well that principled opposition is priceless when it comes to what goes inside our bodies and we let ourselves be tricked into believing that going into another ineffective lockdown would be the third, fault of the unvaccinated and not the fault of the toxic policy of ineffective vaccines.

We took pleasure in scapegoat in the unvaccinated because after months of engineered lockdowns by political leaders blinded by power, having someone to blame and turn to burn at the stake felt good. We believed we had logic, love and truth on our side, so it was easy to wish death upon the unvaccinated. Those of us who ridiculed and mocked the noncompliant did it because we were embarrassed by their courage and principles and didn't think the unvaccinated would make it through unbroken and we turned the holdouts into punching bags. Lambie, Carr, Chant, Andrews, McGowan, Gunner and the other cast of hundreds in prominent roles and we hear in America, we could add Fauci and the rest of them and Biden in prominent roles need to be held to account for vilifying

the unvaccinated in public and fueling angry social media mobs. The mobs, the masked Nazis, and the vaccine disciples have been embarrassed by betting against the unvaccinated because mandates only had the power we gave them. It was not compliance that ended domination by big pharma companies, Bill Gates, and his many organizations and the World Economic Forum. It was thanks to the people we tried to embarrass, ridiculed, mock, and tear down. We should all try and find some inner gratitude for the unvaccinated as we took the bait by hating them

because their perseverance and courage bought us the time to see we were wrong. So if mandates ever return for COVID or any other disease or virus, hopefully more of us will be awake and see the rising authoritarianism that is no concern for our well-being and is more about power and control.

The war of the unvaccinated was lost. On the unvaccinated was lost. And we should all be very thankful for that. This is the high wire. We've celebrated our position against this vaccine from the beginning, using science to declare our space. To every writer out there, keep writing statements like this. To every historian, remember what it means to write the true history. History has been stated, it has happened here.

We lost our rights to a lie. Let's admit that. Let's change it. And let's make a better world based on truth. As we watch our stock markets crashing and inflation going through the roof, recognize that the most valuable commodity, the rarest metal available now on this planet, is truth. That should not be the case.

This is what the high wire is all about. This is the Fort Knox for the truth. We're not going anywhere. and we're coming after you. This is the high wire. I'll see you next week.