The Highwire with Del Bigtree - TWITTER CENSORS THE HIGHWIRE

Episode Date: March 18, 2022

TWITTER CENSORS THE HIGHWIREBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-highwire-with-del-bigtree--3620606/support.

We had an amazing show last week, and I think that the way you define that is when you get censored, and that's exactly what took place directly. Just seconds after we finished last week's show, Twitter locked the Highwire's account. This is it. They're asking us to delete the tweet. By deleting it, we have to admit that we have made some sort of mistake policy on spreading, misleading potentially harmful information related to COVID-19. We understand that during times of crisis and instability. It's difficult to know what to do to keep yourself and your loved one safe, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah. Just, I think we're all reaching a point now where as soon as something censored, it's like a badge

of honor. I start looking at it like, geez, I wasn't going to pay attention to that, but maybe I'll watch it now since I know mainstream media is lying, and I know that, you know, Twitter and Facebook and all of them seem to be in Lopstack with the government of the United States wherever they're taking us. And so, you know, I think that if you missed last week's show, clearly that was one I think you should definitely check out. Who killed Ivermectin an incredible expose that took place there? It was just, it was astounding. And so I want you to go and check that out if you haven't seen it already. Now, when we think about, you know, censorship, and we're going to censor free speech. We're going to

censor scientists, which is exactly what last week's show was about. You've got to imagine to yourself, if you reach the place where you're censoring and saying that's dangerous information, you better have it pretty locked down, right? I mean, if you're going to say that anyone that does not agree with us is wrong and we are right, that means that you are sort of stating that you were the pinnacle of truth, that here is where the truth lies and there is no gray area whatsoever. I mean, even under those circumstances, our Constitution still says, you know what, you still got to allow the other opinion.

But let's be clear, if you've reached a place where you are censoring, in the United States of America, you better be rock solid with your facts, right? That's why this next video was, you know, one of those moments where it's never been more painful to be right, which is what we're all experiencing here at the Highwire and me personally. This is the head of the CDC, literally the most important scientific mind that exists in the world during COVID, as we know it, the head of the CDC, the most powerful, you know, health regulatory agency in the United States of America and arguably the world. This is what she had to say on how well they had it locked down when it came to the COVID-19 vaccine.

Could we have improved? Well, you know, I think I can tell you where I was when the CNN became that it was 95% effective on the vaccine. So many of us wanted to be hopeful. So many of us wanted to say, okay, this is our ticket out, right? Now we're done. So I think we have perhaps too little caution and too much optimism for some good things that came our way. I really do.

I think all of us wanted this to be done. Nobody said waning when, you know, oh, this vaccine's going to work. Oh, well, maybe it'll work. It'll wear off. Nobody said, well, what if the next variant doesn't, it doesn't, it's not as potent against the next variant. Nobody said, what if the vaccine doesn't cover the next variant? Oh, really? Really, Michelle? Because I know we said it. You remember I did a whole football analogy like over a year ago? Here's what that looked like. Everybody getting the vaccine is destroying their innate immune system. Those immune antibodies that were non-specific that could have handled any of those thousands of variants we just saw you. They're designed for it by being vaccinated. You just assured yourself that there are no. antibodies inside of you to fight the variance. So if we have strayed far enough away from the vaccine

induced variant that we were looking at, the original spike protein, everyone that is vaccinated is now in horrible, horrible trouble. They're going to be attacked by variants and their bodies will not mount a defense. What? What you mean that here at the high wire, we knew something that the head of the CDC hadn't even like comprehended. No one even told us. Well, Rochelle, I thought you were the ones that were telling everybody else what you knew. Is there actually people you're waiting for to like dictate information to you? I mean, this is so shocking. She said the vaccine, we're so excited about it that perhaps we should have been a little more cautious. We're a little overly optimistic. You think? You think that was the case? But it doesn't end there, right?

It's not bad enough that they flailed on the vaccine. The vaccine's nowhere near 95% of fact. Israel onto its fourth booster that's not working. We're on number three. Everyone across the world caught COVID, whether you were vaccinated or not. The restrictions are now lifting. We're all being told, now you're just going to have to live with it.

But look what else she said about how nailed they were on their facts. And then maybe the other thing I'll say in this area of gray. I have frequently said, you know, we're going to lead with the science. Science is going to be the foundation of everything you do. That is entirely true. I think public heard that is science is full proof. Science is black and white.

Science is immediate and we get the answer and then we make the decisions based on the answer and the truth of science is great. And science is not always immediate. And sometimes it takes months and years to actually find out the answer, but you have to make decisions in a pandemic before you have that answer.

Like I mean, can you believe it? I mean, here she's saying, right? Well, I think the public, misunderstood us when we said we were following the science, I think they thought that the science was black and white, when really the case it was gray. Really? Was it the public thought that or was that where you were saying? Like, how about Tony Fauci? Like, this doesn't sound very gray to me. As attacks on me, quite frankly, are attacks on science. Because all of the things that I have spoken about consistently from the very beginning have been fundamentally based on science.

fundamentally based on science. If you attack me, you attack the science. I am the science. There must be no questions. This is so incredibly dangerous what took place in this country and around the world, that science told the world we've got to figure it out, trust us, it's safe, it's effective, the vaccine will work, lock yourselves down. All of it has come crumbling down and now Rochelle Wollinsky's admitting it. But how many people were censored? How many voices are, has got it right. How about the Great Barrington Declaration? You remember that little thing like world-renowned scientists that all got together and tried to make a difference in the world and said, you're making the wrong decision here. There's another perspective. While you're swimming in your

soup of gray, we actually have a different perspective here. So why don't we have a voice? Why don't we all get together and see we can't work our way out of the gray morass that you apparently were in, Rochelle? No, that can't be. No, there had to be an authentic. attack on the Great Barrington Declaration delivered by Francis Collins, who was caught in email saying exactly this, shut this down. We need the world to believe in us. Incredible. And here's where we're at. This is Jay Batacharya talking about how dangerous what took place is and how it should never happen again. The lockdowns were an enormous catastrophic mistake that should never be repeated. I believe the lockdowns should be seen as a dirty word.

that when we think about lockdowns, we should recoil with horror. Because the policies we've followed have violated not just medical ethics, but also it's crushed the ability for scientists to discuss openly with each other facts and evidence. It's taking a great amount of effort, willingness to face abuse in order for scientists to speak up, and many have been silenced. And so I think the restoration of, the freedom for scientists discussed with one another openly what the evidence actually says

without this fear of repression that we've seen during the pandemic in order to support the lockdowns, needs to end. It needs to end. This must never happen again. I mean, when we look at what took place here, J. Badacharya, and if you watch the highway, I mean, just go back and even just speed through every episode that we've done all through COVID, we have done nothing but a feature here, world-renowned scientists and doctors. and mathematicians, whistleblowers, all coming out, sharing a scientifically backed up perspective

that disagreed with the CDC, where Rachel is still waiting for someone to tell her that the variance might not be covered by the vaccine in the future. Really? Who are you waiting for? Pfizer that's making billions of dollars to tell you that? I mean, this whole thing is so incredible and it's so outrageous. And I know that the history books will get this right. They're going to look back on this as though it was some sort of salem witch trial. But how far away is that moment coming? Where is the finish line on this stupidity? If you look to Australia right now, they just sent out a memo basically to all the doctors to watch out. You could lose your license if you decide to express a differing opinion. Take a look at this. This is outrageous. This is from the

Medical Indemnity Protection Society in Australia. 12 commandments to avoid A-H-P-R-A notifications, meaning sort of like here in America, that'd be like coming after your license, right? This is what this is about. Let's just cut to number nine. You can go through the list. Obviously, you'll find this if you're on our newsletter. We'll give you the whole thing. Number nine, use social media with caution. Be very careful when using social media, even on your personal pages, when authoring papers, or when appearing in interviews. Health practitioners are obliged to ensure their views are consistent with public health messaging. Look at this.

This is particularly relevant in current times. Views expressed which may be consistent with evidence-based material may not necessarily be consistent with public health messaging. Let me read that again. I mean, this is so mind-blowing. Views expressed which may be consistent with evidence-based material, meaning facts, even though you have facts that doesn't matter, may not necessarily be consistent with our public health messaging, which is going to fly in the face of the facts, and we will take

your license if you decide to bring facts to this conversation. All right, number 10. Engage regularly with a GP and or psychiatrist slash psychologist. See being the doctor's doctor. As well as maintaining good mental health, this can assist you if concerns are ever raised that you may have a health impairment, which is affecting your practice. Again, it can be the difference between sitting on the sidelines and continue. to practice. Can you believe this? Keep going to a psychologist. I imagine in Australia,

those psychologists report to the government. Is that what we can expect? Go ahead and just share any concerns you might have about the vaccine program so we can nip you in the bud. Absolutely, absolutely deplorable. The fact that this is the state of science around the world. No wonder, J. Badacharya is shouting from the rooftops as so many that have graced this beautiful stage have. But I think that, there is hope on the horizon. There is a new breed of doctors. In fact, there may be even a new breed of Surgeon General, like the one in Florida who had this to say. It's really been a tragedy that my colleagues, my physician colleagues, have decided that

it's more important to stick with whatever the CDC or Dr. Fauci is saying than relying on their clinical wisdom, experience, and scientific expertise, which is what doctors usually do. So, Now doctors who practice medicine in the way that they think is most appropriate for their patients, when they receive pushback from hospitals, we have an avenue for them to file a complaint with our agency for health care administration that the hospital is interfering with their ability and their clinical judgment in terms of what's best for their patients. I don't know what Dr. Joseph Lodapo is thinking there. I don't think Florida has enough landmass to handle the amount of Americans that want to move there right now, especially doctors who actually believe

in the doctor-patient relationship and the ability to treat them as they see fit, given that that patient can move on to another doctor if they don't agree with the treatment they're getting. You see, this is the whole issue. We have got to be free to let our doctors treat us, not be dictated to by, you know, bureaucrats who are swimming in the gray but telling you it's black and white. What an amazing statement. I see a huge future for Dr. Lodapo out there. I think so many of us dreaming that he becomes maybe head of health and human services

in the future or something like that. Can you imagine what that world looks like? That's what we're dreaming into here at the high wire. A science that is back to, as J. Badacharya put it, and Dr. Loppo is so well dictating there, you need to be able to stand up for science. The scientific method only works if we can be honest, if we can have conversations, if we can realize that every patient is different than the one that

walk through the door before them. The scientific method absolutely demands. By its definition, demands challenge. That's how it works. You come up with a theory or you come up with a new product. Then science and all the best scientists in the world attack it with every concern they can think of. And if it makes it through that gauntlet of being attacked from every side possible, then and only then can you say, hey,

It proved to be safe and effective against the greatest minds who attacked it with everything they had in the world. You do not allow science to say, no one is allowed to touch my precious, my precious, stay away. Are you crazy? That is going to lead to something that could wipe out our species if we're not already on track for that.