The Highwire with Del Bigtree - WE’RE APPROACHING A MILLION VACCINE INJURIES IN THE U.S.

Episode Date: December 7, 2021

Noted Cardiologist, Peter McCullough, returns to The Highwire to discuss new data on the dangerous side effects from the Covid-19 vaccine on the heart.Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-highwire-with-del-bigtree--3620606/support.

This is shocking, terrifying, horrifying, awful, and it's the truth. Here it is in circulation journal. Abstract 107.1-2 MRNA COVID vaccines dramatically increased endothelial inflammatory markers and ACS risk as measured by the PULS cardiac test. This is a warning by Stephen R. Gundry. Our group has been using the PL Plus cardiac test, GD Biosciences, Irvine, California, California, a clinically validated measurement of multiple protein biomarkers, which generates a score predicting the five-year risk, the percentage chance of a new acute coronary syndrome,

meaning occurring, you know, basically overnight, shocking you, acute. Here it is. The score has been measured every three to six months in our patient population for eight years. So this is a long-term study, folks, and in many ways it's accidental because they've been tracking these people. three to six months, they measure their population over the last eight years. Recently, with the advent of the MRI COVID-19 vaccines by Moderna and Pfizer, dramatic changes in the plus score become apparent in most patients. In most patients, what? This report summarizes those results. A total of 566 points,

age 28 to 97, male and female ratio one to one seen in a preventive cardiology practice, had a new pulse test drawn from two to ten weeks following the second COVID shot and was compared to the previous poll score drawn three to five months previously before the shot. Remember? So we have before and after, right? Here's what they discovered. Baseline IL-16 increased from 35 to negative over to negative 20 above the norm. All the rest of these numbers above the norm. Let's get to what would make sense to most of us to speak English. AGF increased from 42 over negative 12 above the norm, above the norm posed back. Here's the point. These changes resulted in an increase of the pulse score from 11% in a five-year risk association to 25%. That means 25% of these people are now in a high-risk

category of having a cardiac event compared to 11% of them. It doubled. The vaccine is doubling the heart risk. Folks, I don't know what that means to you. I don't know if 11 and 25% sounds like a lot. This is the number one cause of death is heart disease. Over 650,000 people every year die in the United States of America from heart disease. Can you imagine doubling that? Well, I'm not the only one alarmed.

Scientists all around the world are alarmed. This is just a great interview by a cardiologist in England that is trying to bring attention to this. And he even leaks out that he knew other studies like this. we're showing the same thing take a look at this this abstract publication circulation i was concerned about it for a number of reasons so first and foremost we have to understand that there's been a shift in understanding of heart disease over the years that we know now it's a chronic inflammatory condition that is exacerbated by some called incident resistance which talked about on the show before which is related to poor lifestyle um now what this abstract has shown what this

research has shown is that mark is associated with increasing the risk of heart attack and probably even progression of underlying heart disease and people have already got some heart disease, has been significantly increased risk from 11% of five years, risk of heart attack, to 25%. Now, that's a huge increase. If this is true, then it's very concerning indeed. But in medicine, in good science, we never rely on one study. We need to replicate these findings. However, what I will share with you today on GB News is a few days ago after this was published, somebody from a very prestigious British institution, Cardiology Department, researcher, a whistleblower, if you like, contacted me to say that the researchers in this department

had found something similar within the coronary arteries linked to the vaccine, inflammation from imaging studies around the coronary arteries. And they had a meeting, and these researchers at the moment have decided they're not going to publish their findings because they are concerned about losing research money from the drug. industry. Now, this person was very upset about it, and I wanted to obviously share this on GB News today. What I would say is that we then, knowing this information, which is very concerning, Stephen Gundry's paper in circulation, and also anecdotal evidence. I mean, I have a lot of interaction with the cardiology community across the UK, and anecdotally, I've been getting told by

colleagues that they are seeing younger and younger people coming in with heart attacks. Now, what does this mean in terms of the data we have to put the jigsaw for the pieces together we know since july there's been almost 10 000 excess non-COVID deaths and most of those or significant proportion of those are being driven by circulatory disease in other words heart attack and stroke there's been a 30 percent increase in people have a dying at home and often these are because of cardiac arrest of course this is also something close to my heart because my own father is one of those statistics he had a cardiac arrest at home July the 26th so when these figure these data since this data has been collected so where do we go from here i think the signal is quite strong i personally

think that this needs investigating so i think the joint committee of vaccines and immunization should absolutely investigate this i think that the researchers i really hope that they take a look in the mirror and realize the ones from where this whistleblowers come from they realize that they should publish this stuff because their duty primarily is to patients, not the interest of the drug industry. And I think the third thing, and this has been a discussion that's been ongoing, I think now it's high time that policymakers around the world put an end to the mandates. Because I think if this signal is strong and if it's correct, then history will not be on their

side and the public will not forgive them for it, Alex. So this is very concerning. It needs investigating and hopefully it can be resolved very soon. That was Dr. Asim Mahhotra speaking to a news station in the UK. Obviously, this study has got him alarmed. I wanted to speak to someone I trusted, so I gave Dr. Peter McCullough a call. He joins me now. Dr. McCullough, this article, first of all, tell me, you know, what are the beats of this article?

So we have this study that I understand it, looks for certain proteins which lead to an understanding of your future risk of heart. issues and conditions, and we're seeing essentially a doubling of these sort of markers. Is that the basic sense of it? Well, thanks for having me on the show, Del. Yeah, so the context here is that this is the American Heart Association annual scientific sessions, and this was an abstract. It's actually a very highly valued. It's heavily vetted.

It's actually hard to get an abstract except with that. I mean, I know I've been going that meeting for decades. It's very hard to get an abstract acceptance. So this is high science, first off. Second off, this is a multi-marker panel that's been used previously, and it uses a lot of innovative factors, interleukin, fatty acids, synthetases, and others that predict when an atherosclerotic plaque

is gonna rupture and trigger a heart attack, trigger my carterone infarction. And I think that the shocking news is how significantly these factors are elevated from baseline and how sustained it is. And we now have data coming forward from Bruce Patterson with the respiratory infection showing that the spike protein is recoverable

in human monocytes for up to 15 months. Now, Bruce Patterson on the McCullery report, just last week, gave the data on the vaccinated. And again, the spike protein, not just the S1 segment, but in the vaccinated, the S1 and S2 segment are in the body for months after vaccination. And we have data now with this study suggesting the spike protein

and probably what's triggered by it, these interleukins and other factors, are providing this critical chain of logic to suggest that the vaccination process of vaccination and its biological sequelae could trigger a myocardion infection. Now this is separate from myocarditis. Miocharditis is a separate process where we now know that the spike protein directly damages periscites around the blood vessels and heart. We're talking about probably older individuals with atherosclerosis having a myocardial infarction. You know the VAR system, the The vaccine, aversive vent reporting system does record my caro infarction.

There's thousands of them. And I can tell you what I've learned as a cardiologist is I think for patients coming in with chest pain and suspected heart attack, one of the boxes we should check is actually whether or not they've received a COVID-19 vaccine and probably in the last three or six months step of a window. Do you think when you look at this, I mean, one of the things that was really, I think, shocking about this study is just how in depth it was, that they were actually tracking these people beforehand.

We have the data. This wasn't just sort of looking back and trying to cherry pick information. This is a group of individuals, as I understand it, we have been following and sort of every six months studying these biomarkers. So when they started getting vaccination, we have a very clear understanding of this effect. And so, you know, are you, I mean, obviously we just saw from Dr. Mahaltra in England. Is this a conversation now amongst cardiologists? Is this really the type of thing that could break the back of this sort of vaccine mandate, do you think? Well, it's certainly a research conversation.

And I agree with Dr. Mahatra. You know, there needs to be research funding to start to investigate vaccine injuries. You know, we're approaching a million vaccine injuries in the United States. That's like going to be more than all the heart attacks in the United States combined across different organ systems. And he's right. We need to study this. The vaccine manufacturers have been so many stakeholders that have been so many stakeholders that have profited so greatly, they clearly have funds to support research into vaccine injuries.

You know, the concerning thing is we had a paper from our institution last year with the respiratory infection that when in the middle of a heart attack, when we put a stent in, if someone is actually having active COVID, they have a 20% chance dealt of clogging off the stent. And I can tell you, that rate normally is way less than 1%. What that taught us is that COVID-19, the respiratory illness is a hyper-coagable state. Patients can develop life-threatening blood clots. And I can tell you, when the stents clog off, it's actually worse than the native heart attack, the index case that comes in. So I'm concerned now that we've got a milieu that it looks like it can trigger a heart attack. It can destabilize atheroscotic plaque. And we know that the post-vaccine milieu is also hypercoagable,

that blood clots can form. So now we're looking at big trouble as we begin to vaccinate over and over again, particularly boosters. Remember, all the elderly now are uncovered. We have 22 studies showing the vaccines basically ran out of protection after six months. And so now we're going to have a whole round of boosters in the elderly. Those are the ones prone for these atheroscotic events. You've been very vocal on all of this. You've obviously put your career on the line. These are the types of conversations that are difficult.

As Dr. Mahaltra so clearly put there, he's talking to doctors and scientists off the record that are saying, we saw similar things. We don't want to publish it because we're so afraid of the pushback from the pharmaceutical institutions, the funding to our, you know, research. We don't want to lose that. That really seems to be like there's this bullying going on around the world because of all the funding and all of the fingers that pharma has, you know, in the pots, it seems, of medicine. Yet you're speaking out. Are you know, are you feeling like you're gaining ground? Are there more politicians? Or there are more people starting to listen? Because this is, one of many, as you said, this is in addition to the myocarditis, the periocarditis issue that's really affecting the youth that are getting this vaccine, amongst all the other, you know, adverse events that are taking place. Is there a listening that is starting to happen in this nation and around the world, do you think? You know, there certainly is, Don, I think your program's gone a long way to help really the world understand where we are. One of the things that doctors in my circles are doing is we're doing public programs, where we'll go into cities, we'll have a

program with lawmakers and with doctors, sometimes two or three private presentations, and we just go over the data, just like you did. We go over the data, present the information, and then we move into big public programs. These are attracting 500 to 5,000 people at a time. People are at the edge of their seats. They want to learn about COVID-19. They want to see the data. You know, not they don't want to see a media filter. They want to see the published manuscripts. What, you know, how do we treat COVID-19? Where are the data? Where are the data and what the vaccines do? from a beneficial perspective and then what are the downsides of the vaccines? And this is a scientific reawakening across the country.

And it's sad, you know, where are the medical schools doing this? Where are the departments of public health? People all over the world two years into this. And they haven't really had any fundamental education on the pandemic. The CDC just reported that 30% of the medical establishment, frontline doctors and nurses, have not received this back. vaccine are refusing to. That's an astronomical number of people that usually promote vaccinations. My theory is that they're seeing failure of the vaccine to even protect against COVID. But beyond

lack of protection, I have to imagine, they're seeing adverse events that are scaring them and keeping them from making the decision that would help them move on with the rest of their career. Do you think we're seeing a noticeable rise now in adverse events from this vaccine to the place where your usual gelets may really just have to face the fact? Or are we still, is it still hiding? You know, are we still sort of seeing this hiding? Are they just writing it off as, well, it would have been a regular heart attack or it would have been something else? Or is it becoming more obvious to the establishment? I have a little different interpretation, respectfully, that 30% number. But I think that 30% number is really comprised on the efficacy side,

Meaning that a part of that is people have had COVID-19, the respiratory illness and they've been following it. They know they can't get it a second time. They know that their immunity is robust, complete, and durable. Now, even the CDC admits it, you can't get a second time and spread it to someone. So they see no value in getting a vaccine because of respiratory illness. And remember in health care, particularly in the labor force, is very gender imbalance. A large number of weight in age are in that group. And many have just looked at their merchant and fetal health and said, you know what, I just don't want to take the risks.

We don't have any studies, safety studies. We don't have any assurances that a woman, a childbearing potential won't be injured or her future child be injured or have problems with birth defects. And we certainly don't have any reassuring data in pregnant women. So I think that's probably the 30% group. The larger question is, is the physician population and is the extenders, the nurse practitioners and physician assistants, are they going to start to field these vaccine injuries? Del, I can tell you, in my practice, in the last two months, I've seen for the first time of my career, blood clots in the arms of, in fact, two women about my age, now about four to six

months after the vaccine where the injection was in the same arm. I've never seen that in my career. This has taken interventions with blood clotting, dissolving agents. And I think there's going to be just so many of these. And at some point in time, there's going to be capitulation. And the doctor's going to have to say, listen, we just don't. These are just too rare to keep coming up over and over again. The same thing with myocarditis.

You know, the back of the envelope calculation is the United States, we should have for children and adolescents, we should have 600 to 800 cases in the United States. as a background rate for the entire country and were already past 13,000 cases in the VAIR system. In fact, you're a city of Toronto hospital reported a few weeks ago. They had over 100 active cases of vaccine-induced myocarditis. I really hope people wake up to the vaccine injuries so we can actually start to get clinical trials and research programs and learn how to treat these vaccine injuries and get people restored back to health. It's so important.

you're playing such a huge role, obviously, in getting the word out. I know we are both committed. It's just, they're going to wake up. We're going to understand it. It's just a matter of when. How many lives will have to be lost? How many lives will have to be destroyed before we admit the obvious? This has been a scientific blunder of epic proportions.

It needs to stop. So I'm going to let you get back to it. I know you're squeezing us in. I want to thank you for your time. Keep up the great work, Dr. McCullough, and I look forward to speaking with you. you again soon. Okay, thank you, Adele. You too. All right, you take care. If you like that clip, then be sure to check out our live broadcast of the

High Wire every Thursday morning at 11 a.m. Pacific time. You can watch it on iTunes and Twitter. We'll see you there.