The Highwire with Del Bigtree - WHY DID DEL GLITTER BOMB THE USA?

Episode Date: May 21, 2024

Amid the wave of journalists and health leaders changing their tune on vaccine safety, former White House Coronavirus Response Coordinator, Dr Deborah Birx, made several claims about Long COVID, natural infection, and COVID Vaccination that Del just had to address with an illuminating demonstration on natural spread vs. vaccination.Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-highwire-with-del-bigtree--3620606/support.

Whoa, I feel a demo. I feel a demo coming on. It's been a long time for those of you. I'm not sure if it's going to work. We haven't even tried it. But first to get to the bottom of this, I'm going to harp on a Chris Cuomo interview a little bit more. This one is with Deborah Birx. I think what's in it is really important. So take a look at this. So, Doc, AstraZeneca made a headline today pulling the vaccine. They say it's because the demand curve isn't there anymore. There are other products. Other people say it's because the other products are better than their monkey. based one and that has less side effects than AstraZeneca, and it is motivated people's paranoia about vaccines. What is your opening statement about whether or not the COVID vaccines were effective and whether they are safe compared to most vaccines? They were very effective for what they were supposed to be used for, which was prevent severe disease and hospitalization at deaths. And that's what the vaccines were studied to do in this country, and that's what they did.

Now, the question, you're asking a broader question because a lot of people were immunized that weren't in those high-risk groups. And that's why there has to be this transparent panel and discussion. I do believe, and that's what you're getting at, were there issues with the vaccines when you've immunized millions, close to billions of people? Tracking that will give us critical information because what I love that you had Sean on, and he made the, point. A lot of his symptoms are similar to long COVID symptoms. Well, that makes total sense. That happens often with immunizations, that if the natural disease can cause it, then it also can sometimes be seen in certain profiles of the vaccine. We should be studying that right now.

Tell the people with long COVID and vaccine reactions to come forward. Study their genetics. We're in the 21st century. We know how to solve these issues, but we're not really. I really bring all the pieces we have to bear. But is the reason because they don't want to know that they being the deep state, big pharma, the government, whatever boogeyman you want to fill in, because the truth is the vaccines didn't really work and there are way more side effects and more people got sick than got better as a result of it? Well, that's why we need all the people to come forward that have had reactions because

I'm not sure all of them have been reported. Do I think it's millions? No. Could it be thousands? Yes, but there's millions of people with long COVID. So proportionally, when you look at it in an honest data-driven way, more people have long COVID from having COVID than had vaccine reactions. All right, there's a lot going on there. She's basically admitting, look, all that when you give a lot of vaccines, there's certainly people that get injured. We know that. And it's really great. We should be tracking them. Should be tracking them. I thought this was an experimental vaccine. I thought that was the entire purpose. was tracking. We've gotten deep into that. But now she's finally admitting there's some injuries. If you watch that whole interview, Chris Cuomo will go on to ask, well, I mean, should have been

given to everybody. She very clearly says, look, the children, I think there was a question there, the children were at no risk. Where did you hear that here on the high wire? We were screaming from the mountops. Please don't give this to kids. They don't need it all. It's only an increased risk. Now the science shows that. But I really want to explain something to everybody right now. And this comes from an interview I actually did with the New York Times. And I forget the reporter's name, but she actually ended up writing a fairly fair article. And I've mentioned a couple times. It's one of the few times in one of these interviews, I feel like I finally got an aha.

And sometimes, as luck would have it, I do achieve those. Here's what I want you all to understand about the statement that Deborah Burke's just made. What she is saying is that, look, if the elements of a virus are in a vaccine, it just goes to figure that the side effects of that virus, that there must also be similar side effects to that vaccine. In this case, she said long COVID, which as Ron Johnson said is where they're going to try and hide all the vaccine injury. Let's call it long COVID, since everybody got the vaccine. Let's just say it was actually the virus that did it. And she is starting to start that mantra. And this is where I am going to blow this apart. And so follow me on this. What she's saying is,

look, there's long COVID. Certainly the virus itself caused more long COVID than the vaccine. Whatever you have of that? You have no evidence of that. In fact, I'm going to use some common sense right now to tell you why I think the exact opposite is true. Okay. So let's talk about a virus. Let's say COVID-19. Let's say this is the virus that escaped the Wuhan lab and is suddenly blowing in the wind across the world. I have a map of the United States of America. I have a map. I have a I haven't tried this, we'll see if this works. May take a couple of attempts. This is really, as I said, we put this show together at the last minute.

Okay. But what I want to show you here is that if this is the virus and it's coming to America, it ends up doing this. Okay? All right. Can I get another camera over here? Hey, Mike, come on over here. I want to show this, all right? Now, really zoom in here, really zoom in and see if we can see that if you really look,

you see that there's some people that got it. have light specklings of the blue particles here because it's random. A virus is random, all right? So pull back for a second. Let me just talk to the camera. A virus when it's blowing in the wind is random, okay? Whether you catch it or not, you may or may not. Enough people might get infected before you do to create herd immunity all around you.

This is the reality we know from centuries of science. It's blowing through the wind. You might get such a light dose that you have, you're an asymptomatic. You don't even barely feel it. doesn't do anything at all. So let's just say that that is the natural virus. That's how it works. Some get it, some don't.

There's a randomization to it. So now what you're saying is that that randomization is going to cause more of the side effects than the vaccine itself. Okay? Now let's talk about the vaccine, shall we? And this is what I said to the New York Times reporter. Let's say that this is the vaccine. Now there's a few differences.

The vaccine is not the entire virus. The vaccine is only the spike protein. And this is what I said to that reporter. Can we agree that the vaccine, that the most dangerous part of the virus is the spike protein, would we agree on that? She said, yeah, that's my understanding of it. Okay, mine too. So we took the most dangerous part of the virus, not the weakest part, the most dangerous part,

and we made a vaccine that that's all it is. All it's going to do is get me to produce the most dangerous part of the virus all through my body. So if the spike protein is what causes long COVID naturally, and the spike protein is what causes, you know, myocarditis and paracarditis, all the science shows this. They're finding it throughout the systems, and the natural virus can cause that. Well, then, okay, let's just say all things are equal. This is what I said. If the spike protein in this vaccine is the exact same as the one in the virus, then they have the same amount of ability to cause myocarditis or paracoditis. That would be true. Let me add, though, a couple of things. This is not any usual spike protein. They made a frankens spike protein. They made it last longer because if they used the regular spike protein MRNA, the immune system killed it too fast. It didn't last long enough. So they injected and inserted a pseudo-uridine, which meant it could last longer inside the body. This was the whole article. We've discussed it a million times. This was the genius of the people that made this vaccine.

They made this so it won't die. It's an unkillable. Now it lasts in the body for up to 60 days, three months, six months. We've talked about all the studies instead of dying immediately upon entry into the body. So now it's even stronger. And when it comes to the load you're getting, all of science bragged about the fact that there was more antibody production. SARS-Co2 antibody profile of naturally infected, 50-fold higher antibody levels than the naturally infected. Our vaccine is giving you more of the spike protein than inhaling it.

So now you're getting a higher dose of the most dangerous part of the virus, and we've made it a frankin spike protein that cannot die. And then what did we do? Let's just say all things are equal, which they clearly are not. I think this is far more dangerous. Now we took the randomization away. Now it's not whether you catch it or not. In a vaccine program, everybody gets it.

Come on over here with the cameras. So this is what the vaccine program does. It makes sure that there is no random. We want every single person in our country and around the world to be infected with our pseudo-Frankin spike protein so that nobody's left behind so that everybody comes in contact with it. That's what we did to our country and to the entire world. And you want to tell me that the,

people that only caught the natural are having more long COVID or more myocarditis, that's insane. It defies all reason. And you're right, Deborah Birx, you better start having everybody report their injuries. And though you would like to hope it's only thousands and not millions, let's just look at fairs because Senator Ron Johnson has already said, we're already at a million here. 1,637,441 reports from people that barely even knew that this reporting system existed, by doctors that have been scared to even talk about it by people like Chris Cuomo. They've been said, don't touch it, you'll be shamed, you'll lose your license. And still 1.6 million reports of injury.

And guess what? Every study ever done to the VAIR system, as Senator Ron Johnson points out, says that at the very best, it captures 10% of those being injured. And most likely in this Harvard study, fewer than 1% of vaccine adverse events are ever reported to VAERS. 1% of 1.6 million. Can you imagine if anything like that is true? What if it's just 10%? That's 10 million. If it's 1% 100 million people are injured, I don't know, but someone's going to have some explaining to do.

And trust me, now that that door is cracked open, and we've been right the whole time, telling you the truth the whole time, we're not going to stop here. But we need your help. Look at what we've achieved here. I have got a mess on my hands, by the way. I'll be covered in sparkles for the rest of this just for you. But I want to say this. all of this reporting that's possible. The only place that you heard the truth was here on the high wire.

The only reason we could have these lights and these cameras and the legal team and the ability to do the research around the world to get you the data that nobody else could. The only way that was possible was by you that are donated to us. You made it possible. Every one of you is responsible today for the sea change that is now happening around the world. This is a critical moment. If we never want to have this done to us again, if we want free choice in the future, we have a lot of work to do right now. We do not want to slow down.

As Senator Ron Johnson said, I'm not going to back down. Neither am I, Ron. And neither are our supporters. Please, if you are watching this show right now and are recognizing how important it is to have news that actually reports the facts and the truth and interviews people that are being sidelined instead of as a part of the lie, Please help us now. Our matching funds, we're in a matching funds moment. We've now hit of the 500,000 to be matched. Last week, we're at 200,000, 235,000.

This week we are at 395,000. We have 115,000 or 105,000 left to go. So please, let that be you. Double your money this week. Double your money to support the, you know, the fourth estate, the fourth branch of government. The last known truth-telling news organization on this planet, the High Wire. I'm really glad that Tucker Carlson and Joe Rogan all eventually got onto this issue.

But we were here first. And I didn't think they would have ever covered it if you hadn't helped us do all the research we did and bring it to the public. $24 a month would be awesome if you're going to do that matching for 2024. The recurring donation helps us know what we can invest in, how many lawsuits we can. do, how many investigations we can do, how many people we can hire great scientists around the world, you make all that possible. Thank you so much. Now, when the question was, and Chris Cuomo said to Deborah Berks, is it just because why aren't

they doing the studies? Why have we always sidelined the injured? Are we doing it? And she's like, well, yeah, we should definitely investigate those as though it's always been done. It hasn't been done. One of the most famous interviews, and I've played it so many times, I think it's the most important interview of all times.

The head of the NIH back in, I believe it was 1995, Bernadine Healy. She was there from 91 to 93. Actually, I think this interview was like somewhere around 2008, sat with Cheryl Adkinson on CBS. Why aren't they doing the studies is the question. That's what Chris Cuomo just asked. Why don't they study those that are being injured? Why don't they? If we know that all vaccine caused harm, why don't we do that science?

This is what she said. This is the time when we do have the opportunity to understand whether or not there are susceptible children, perhaps genetically, perhaps they have a metabolic issue, mitochondrial disorder, immunological issue, that makes them more susceptible to vaccines plural or to one particular vaccine or to a component of vaccine like mercury. The fact that there is concern that you don't want to know that susceptible group is a real disappointment to me. If you know that susceptible group, you can save those children. The reason why they didn't want to look for those susceptibility groups was because they're afraid that if they found them, however big or small they were, that that would scare the public away. There you have it. People always ask me, what's the motivation, Dill? Why would the CDC lie to us? Why would doctors lie? Certainly they've looked into this.

No, they have not. For exactly the reason Bernardine Healy said, and it makes some sense. What she says is when I looked into it, I couldn't believe it. We have never studied the injured, the people that took the vaccine and ended up having autism. So everyone out there that will tell you, oh, we've looked at it and we've studied it, not true. That's a lie, Chris. So please stop saying stupid things like that just because Tony Fauci, says it's true. Bernardine Healy is telling you the truth and my investigations, both through

our legal work and everything, shows that this is true. These vaccines are not being studied and the people being injured are not being studied. Why? Because they are so afraid that if they studied a group of people and discovered that there are a small group of people being injured by vaccines, that no matter how small that group is, simply admitting they exist, would kill the vaccine program and put fear in the people, and that's why they don't do the science. There you have it. We've now turned a corner. Deborah Birx is demanding the science.

Chris Cuomo is asking for a 9-11-style commission. We're going to hold them to that. Trust me, it's only just begun.