The Highwire with Del Bigtree - WINNERS, SINNERS, & THE DEATH OF A GENERATION

Episode Date: March 25, 2022

What is Killing Millennials?; Airlines Ready to Drop Masks; Chaos & Hypocrisy in NY; Cleveland Clinic Denies Child’s Kidney Transplant; Huge ICAN-funded Legal Win; Get to L.A. April 10th!Guests: Jessica Rose, PhD, Jenn & Dane Donaldson, Aaron Siri, Esq.Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-highwire-with-del-bigtree--3620606/support.

Good morning, good afternoon, good evening, wherever you are out there in the world, it's time to step out onto the high wire. You know, last week was amazing. So many of you seeing Vaxed for the first time, the comments were incredible. And then some of you that really hadn't seen it for quite some time, it really does give you a different perspective of what we've been through. And the work that we have ahead to try and stop the, you know, ongoing travesty of vaccine. injury to the innocent children and even the adults in this country and around the world. In many ways,

COVID was just a hiccup for us here at the high wire. Those have you that have been following us from the beginning. We have been working to try and get to that point where we are back in control of our bodies and the bodies of our children. We are not there yet, folks. As I've said, we've won a battle and we have won it well. But the work has only begun. As I said, this was just a detour that helped us reign in and, you know, illuminate the truth to millions of new people. But now we have work to do. But just to get a sense, to remind ourselves what we've been through,

one of the architects of this insanity is admitting everything I've been telling you. We've won, and we've won handily. Here it is from the horse's mouth. This was an interesting trust, a case test of people's trust, in their politicians or their health system. And, you know, statistically, we didn't do as well as I would have expected. You know, in fact, you know, I'm cited as some, you know, mastermind of some evil plot in many, many cases. So, no, I didn't expect any of that, you know, in some ways the politicization of, you know,

taking vaccines and helping protect other people. you could almost say that's a step backwards. You know, I hope vaccine acceptance for other diseases like measles is not reduced by this. But, you know, a lot of people jumped in and took the vaccines, but a meaningful minority in most countries were led down a path of believing that not only, you know, were there rare side effects, but that the vaccine wasn't. properly tested or was part of some evil conspiracy. Led down the path of rare side effects to the idea that the vaccine wasn't tested properly. It's a fact the vaccine was not tested properly. A proper test, Bill, would have lasted two to five years, probably 10 years given that we're

now starting to recognize the manipulation of DNA, which could affect our lives going to the future and perhaps future generations of our offspring. So you're right. And though I know he looks at it in a negative way, I don't think you can, you know, there's not a better video out there to explain what has happened. They have failed in the greatest possible way. They took what was apparently about a 90% vaccine confidence in the United States of America and reduced it below 50%.

Just to be clear, the CDC recommends that everybody that got a vaccine gets a booster shot. That's the CDC recommendation. And just five minutes ago, we looked up the CDC website and 97,000, 97 million people in America have received their booster shot. That is, you know, less than a third the total population of the United States of America. It's about 28% of our population. They boast that it's about 44% of the vaccinated, meaning 44% of those that were eligible that once believed in vaccines. That means that the very best, there's a 60% percent.

group of people, even that are vaccinated, that don't listen to the CDC any longer, have thrown in the towel and said, we're done with this. And imagine if we are really looking at 28% of the nation that believes in the CDC any longer and trust the COVID-3 booster shot recommendation, then we clearly are no longer that meaningful minority that Bill Gates is referencing. We are the majority of the United States of America. And I think, as we're the beacon of light and hope for the world. We are leading a majority around the world. But boy, do we have work to do. We're going to talk about a lot of that. But what did he say there? What he said is, well, you know, there were people led down this path of, you know, looking at, you know, rare side effects

and believing that the vaccine wasn't properly tested. Nothing is more alarming or showing us that we were on to something from the beginning than these discussions. We're starting to see headlines of young people, especially, you know, getting sick, almost dying. What happens if there's not a doctor around, and Haley Bieber confirms she suffered stroke-like symptoms due to a blood clot. When do you remember, I mean, this is happening everywhere, Nelly Court at home, recovering from a blood clot in her arm. Blood clots happening in younger and younger people. Let's just, this is the new normal folks that's get used to it. Italian rider, Sunny Colbrelli stable after cardio respiratory arrest. I mean, a freaking bicyclist who's, you know, got the heart

of a racehorse is collapsing. Autopsy performed on top A, D'SE, St. Louis County Executive died unexpectedly at 37. All of these sudden human death stories. Knoxville teacher and basketball coach with a wonderful smile dies suddenly. And then, of course, we've been talking about this. And I said, you know, people who say, Del, they're going to try and hide it. Hide what? You might be able to hide COVID deaths.

You might be able to sort of, you know, manipulate the COVID deaths and take people that are having heart attacks and put them in the COVID category. You might be able to hide the actual, you know, COVID vaccine rates and who was truly vaccinated. Were they fully vaccinated? Were they boosted? Did they only have one shot? Was there only 14 days after the second shot? They're manipulating all of that.

But one thing you cannot manipulate is the all-cause mortality, just meaning if there's a rise in just death across the board in every nation, that is going to be really hard to hide. And of course, we've reported on this. Insurance Company, Indiana Life Insurance CEO says deaths are up 40% among people age 18 to 64. Stories all over this country about a huge, huge numbers. Insurance groups sees death rates up to birth. 40% over pre-pandemic levels. Insurance executive says death rates among working age people up 40%

and a rise in non-COVID-19 death hits life insurers. And then we told you about the story out of Germany. In Germany, the biggest life insurance company in Germany decided to look at all the ICD codes. What were they paying for in hospitals amongst their insured? And what they found this alarming rate of paying for, you know, services dealing with vaccine injury. And we reported that story. More vaccine side effects than previously known. And this CEO put it out to the nation saying we're being lied to by the government, Andrea Schafeck, this is the guy. Well, guess what? Guess what happens when you tell the truth? When you decide you want to, you know, let people know what's going on. This is just this week. German insurance

company fire a CEO who released COVID vaccine injury data, then scrubs all of their data from the website. They don't leave the data up and say, oh, he got it wrong. Let us. tell you how to read it. They said you're not allowed to look at it. Obviously something's up. Here's a couple of quotes from this article. Schafeck and noticed an unexpected jump in vaccine related health insurance claims in February notified the Paul Ehrlich Institute, the German equivalent of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. That BKK billing data indicated the PEI was underreporting adverse events to COVID vaccines. Look at this. According to Schofack's letter, data from 10.9 million people were analyzed. According to physician billing data,

216,695 were treated for a vaccine adverse event during the first 2.5 quarters of 2021. Figures extrapolated over an entire year for a population of 83 million people, meaning if this percentage lasts across our entire country that got vaccinated, this means that there's going to be 2.5 to 3 million people likely receiving treatment for an adverse event. 4 to 5% of vaccinated people receive treatment for an AE based on these numbers. Those are catastrophic and giant numbers. And amongst those numbers are going to be those that are dying, this rise in death rates. And it's not just one insurance company.

It's multiple across this country. But here's the question. And by the way, people like, well, what's how we're going to talk about now that COVID's over? We're just getting back to our original talking points. And by the way, we have a new mission. We are going to track down all of those lie to us, all of those that destroyed our lives, all of that denied us that denied us care and hospitals and kept us from using life-saving treatments and then put us on ventilators knowing it was going to kill us, and remdesivir, and using a vaccine and promoting a vaccine they knew didn't work and lying about it.

We're going to put all of those people in jail, so stick with the high wire as we track and continue that investigation and show you how they're running for the hills, but don't worry, we're going to find them. But let's get back to this point. If we're seeing a giant rise in all-cause mortality, 40% rise in 18 to 64-year-olds, now just to put that perspective, that CEO said to give this. perspective, when we tried to sort of calculate a rise and death from a catastrophic event, we normally say that a one in a 200 year catastrophic event like a flood would raise the death rate amongst the population about 10%. And what we're seeing here is a 40% rise. Folks, Houston, we've got a problem. But how would we be able to determine whether that rise in deaths is actually caused by the vaccine? I know we're all saying to ourselves, well, some of that

it's definitely got to be suicides, drug overdoses, all these things we've been reporting on, the depression that happens when you lose your job, when you can't go to work, when your business that you spent your life dreaming about, you've built your own brick and mortar, and then the government takes it away from you because it's lost all respect for your rights to the United States of America and around the world. What happens? Well, there's definitely deaths from that. But if there are deaths from the vaccine and they don't want to investigate it and they're telling it's not happening, how will you be able to tell in that all-cause mortality or excess mortality line what was being caused by the vaccines? Well, I want to bring on a specialist. She's an immunology,

computational and molecular biologists, applied mathematics and biochemistry. Dr. Jessica Rose has been writing incredible articles on this, including what is killing the millennials. Jessica Rose joins me now. Jessica, thank you for taking the time. You're so welcome. It's My pleasure. All right. So take me through this. I know that, you know, you've obviously, there's a lot of great doctors and scientists that we have had on the show, Dr. Peter McCullough, Dr. Robert Malone. These folks are quoting you.

You're in discussions on some of these topics. But you started looking at this sort of excess death, these numbers that we've been talking about. And are we able to determine that the vaccine may be contributing to this and how? We can certainly provide evidence to support that the injections are causing the adverse events that we're seeing at enormous rates in just about every adverse event collection data system. I'm actually delving into the VAIR system, which is the vaccine adverse event reporting system of the United States. I had no idea what this was a little more than a year ago. so I'm not, I didn't go in biased and I didn't go in with questions. I was just trying to teach myself how to use R actually.

But this data set, which has been on the go for 30 years, has never revealed safety signals in the way that it's been revealing in the context of these COVID-19 products. We're looking at the right now. Let me just read this to our audience. You are looking at the current VERS data as of March 11th. There are 25,641 reported deaths from the COVID vaccine. 141,000 hospitalizations, 123,000 urgent care, 181,000 office visits, nearly 10,000 cases of antifalaxis, 14,000 Bells, palsy.

That's really just sort of, there's so many more details in there, but that's the broad look at where we're at right now as we're speaking about it. Okay, continue on. That's right. So, and this is a very important point. There are over 10,000 different types of adverse events as written down as Medra codes, we call them, instead of the ICD codes that you mentioned. And this has also never happened before. So besides the obviousness of the atypicalness of what we're seeing, there are ways that you can provide evidence that there is causation, that there's a causal effect here.

And you use something called the Bradford Hill criteria. This is how you provide evidence of causation with epidemiological or biological data. It's a set of nine or ten criteria depending on whether or not you want to include reversibility. And this isn't important if you ask me. And according to the who's guidelines, because they use these criteria to assess causation, it's very important job for them. you only have to satisfy five, according to them, to get a diagnosis of very likely to be a causal link between, say, a vaccine and a particular adverse event. Okay, so the WHO says if you get five out of these 10, any five out of these 10, then it's very likely that, you know, there's a causal relationship between the vaccine. Okay.

Okay. And the issue. Okay. An actual assessment form that you fill out. There are people whose jobs it is to assess causality. And like I said, you can imagine. Of course, you know this. It's very important for them to do this. They successfully used VERS to show causation in the context of the rhodovirus vaccine back in 1999. In the context of interception and get this people.

they were only there were only 15 cases of interception that they called a safety signal that was worthy of determining whether or not there was a link between the rhodovirus vaccine and this interception that was occurring just for people to know interception is a bit like the intestines can kind of turn on themselves and cause blockages and have real issues they saw that the vaccine was causing that and they pulled it back right and because of 15 cases we're looking at 25,000 reports of death in the very same system and we're being told as you were continue on this is just a great vaccine keep taking it booster number four on the way right safe and effective right so one one of the things that's remarkable that I have published two papers on the subject of there's data just descriptive analysis something that's remarkable which is one of the criteria that you should satisfy according to Bradford Hill is something called temporality.

So if there is a temporal relationship, of course, you know, one thing has to proceed the other. Right. And that time distance between those two things, for example, an injection and an adverse event, if that time bear it then it provides very strong evidence that there is a temporal, a causal link. Yeah. So what you're looking at here, those two slides are, real data and in the case of death and all the severe adverse events as a matter of fact there about 50% of the reports are made within 48 hours okay we're talking about a very short time frame between the injection and the onset of a severe adverse event okay that includes disability a life-threatening condition uh and and hospitalization emergency room visit this kind of thing

So it's, to me, there's no doubt in my mind, although this is what I'm doing now. I'm looking at this data every day, all day, but there's no doubt in my mind. Here we go. The peak arises in the 25 to 44 years whose entries are within 30 days of injection, past 30 days of injection, within 30 of injection. Okay. And so what you see here is the one line is the VERS data, and you can see that there's this growth going up at the same time that we're still. the rise and deaths being listed by the CDC. You can see they're virtually coterminous. They seem to work in line together, where you see a rise in one, you see a rise in the other. And so what you're saying is you're basically laying those two timelines on top of each other,

and when they sort of go coterminously work together, it's certainly a signal that there's something going on here. The other months you're kind of flat, and then at the same time you see a rise, you also see a rise in deaths on bears or reports of these deaths. amongst the excess deaths as the CDC and then the rise in deaths on the Vera system are happening at the same time. That gives you a sense there's this temporal relationship. Yes. And it's it's kind of I didn't expect to find that. This was all this article that I wrote was an investigation because I want to know the answer. What's killing the millennials? I mean, because an 84% rise.

And Edward Dowd was right. There is an 84% rise, which is that. something that we need to answer. So what exact age group? So just for when we say millennials, there's an 84% rise in deaths. How long? 25 to 44? Okay. Okay. All right. That's shocking and horrible. Meaning so we're talking compared to what pre-COVID, pre-COVID years, the death rates? Is that where we're at? Compared to there, we're now at an 84% rise in deaths amongst 25 to 44 year olds. All right, here's the headline. CDC data, millennials, experienced a Vietnam War in second half of 2021. 61,000 excess deaths in that age group.

Really, really shocking. Yep, and it happened in the fall. And that was the graph that we just showed was the superimposition of that peak of deaths in fall in that grade troop with a subsequent peak in reports of death in VERS in that exact same age. So it's not proof, but it's more evidence that these injections are playing their role. So the question now is what percentage of the deaths are actually caused by these injections?

What percentage of these injections are causing these 10,000 different types of adverse events? Because as I have said repeatedly in many interviews, there are worse things than death. These things are causing a lot of neurological disabilities. They're causing blood clots, as you know. They're causing myocarditis in children. That is not mild nor like something that passes. This is damage to a vital organ. Cain damage at a young age, at a prepubescent age in some cases,

that's going to be long-lasting, and that's going to come back to haunt you. Yeah. Okay. So let's get back to proving this out. So we've got one. We've got a temporal association. When you look at it, what's the next association that falls into this, you know, proof? Well, a very important one on the subject of myocarditis, since I just mentioned it, which, by the way, for people who don't know, is the inflammation of the myocardium, which is the middle layer of heart that allows it to beat. We see something that one of the Bradford Hill criteria is dose response. So the question that you ask, does more of A result in more of B?

So that to translate that into the VERS data, you would say would a second shot cause an increase in reports of adverse events? So it actually causes a fourfold increase in reports in 50. 15-year-olds and most of those 15-year-olds are boys. The data isn't, oh good, my slide is up. So the data doesn't reflect the gender stratification here, but most of these are young boys. The 15-year-olds, the black line indicates. So this confirms a dose response. And my idea is that this is because there's some kind of cumulative damage done by whatever is in these products, whether it be the spike impregnating the epithelial cells in the heart. I don't know, but this is another very important. It's a really interesting point. And as I think about it,

you know, we'll say, you know, you would say that the vaccine is having no effect on mild carditis. Then if you give one shot and there's barely an effect, if it doesn't have an effect, that second shot should be exactly the same. It should be no effect. But across the board, we see that second shot. They keep saying, let's spread out that second. Let's do other things to see what we can do because we're clearly having this rise in this issue after the second dose. And so it does make sense. If you want to prove that this product is directly connected to an issue, you should see no response to the different doses. If it's safe, it's safe.

What do you give 20 of these things? One of them, five of them. But we're seeing that second shot, you know, across the board in every nation in the world. You really can't get better proof, at least in that category, that this is a double. dose dependent response. Okay, interesting. Mm-hmm. So another really important one is plausibility. And I gave a presentation to show everyone these 10 criteria being satisfied.

And the question you ask, is it biologically plausible that A can cause B, or by A is the injection and B is the adverse event. So I think there's a dual mechanism of action here. I think the spike proteins are causing damage, and I think also the lipid nanoparticles are causing quite a bit of damage, which most people aren't speaking about. So the lipid nanoparticles are a mixture, a melange,

of four different fats, basically, and one of them is called a cationic lipid, which is a very toxic lipid. It disrupts membranes, and that's kind of why it's one of these four fats because the goal of wrapping this MRNA payload in these fat bubbles is to optimize deliverability. So they're this beautiful mix of four different fats and one of them is highly toxic and so is Peg. Pegg is another one of the fats

which is attached to the polyethylene glycol, correct? Yeah. Right. Which is a toxin. I mean everybody has heard about the anaphylaxic reactions that occur in some people who, you know, have been prior exposure to PEG. And the spike protein itself is being called out as being cytotoxic. I mean, this is why we're thinking that we're seeing a lot of the clotting action that we're seeing because of the impregnation of epithelial cells because the spike protein finds its

receptor ACE2. And so there's this toxicity associated with the spike. So it is in fact plausible that these dual mechanisms of action are causing these adverse events. And to talk about all. I love what I love about this, Jessica, is that we kind of, science seems daunting. But I even remember in school in a science class, you recognize how incredibly reasonable it is. right? It's actually quite logical in the way that it slowly just breaks down. If A equals B and B equals C, then A equals C. I mean, it's pretty obvious what we're looking at here. And when you look at

plausibility, it's a very simple question, which is, would this product on its own be dangerous? The spike protein is the worst part of the virus. It is what is causing the blood clots, the Thryombocytes opinion. It's what we're terrified of. It's what's getting into the cells. I mean, this thing on its own is dangerous, and the vaccine sets out to make billions of these things inside of your body. So is it plausible that that could be problematic? You're damn right it is. It's literally like the bioweapon of the virus itself. It's what it's attacking you with.

That's what you need to be afraid of. And this injection is injecting it and making your cells create it. And then you look at this fatty lipid package, as you're pointing out, that is polyethylene glycol, but some people are deathly allergic to, have anaphylaxic reactions. and then you have proteins that are known to be toxic. And in fact, are there to be toxic to try and cut through your cells and things to get in there and make sure it lands in the right place. So we have plausibility.

It makes perfect sense. And two more items. The spike protein that is delivered in the fat bubble that is translated from the MRNA is different from the spike protein on the coronavirus. and it's different by design. So it makes it less tasty, let's call it, to the innate immune system, which makes it harder to clear,

which makes it last longer. Right. We now have a paper that's recently been published that shows the presence of the MRNA in germinal centers of lymph nodes after 60 days. So A, it sticks around and it wasn't meant to. Spike protein, same story, sticks around, wasn't meant to. sticks around, wasn't meant to.

But more disturbing is what came out in Pfizer's data dump recently about the biostribution of these things. They weren't meant to travel far away from the injection site and the draining lymph node that is proximal. They found these things and they knew this when they did their clinical trial, that these were accumulating in the liver, the spleen,

the ovaries, the brain, the test, and look at what we're seeing in the adverse event data. So they actually, they took this spike protein, which is sort of like the deadly monster, and made it more invincible so that it could last longer and do its job. For those of you that are gamers out there, what I'm imagining is my mind is, you know those like sword games where there's that one bad guy

and you hit him four times and he disappears and you've killed him and knocked him dead? They basically took that and said, no, now you're going to have to hit it eight times in order to kill it. And by the way, it's spreading to every part of your body. They literally made an army of more powerful and stronger, long-lasting, deadly spike proteins. I mean, it's hard to wrap your head around how stupid that actually is.

That's precisely the word I would use. I mean, it was either stupid or designed this way because the spike protein, it was a very bad protein to use to test out this tech. And this is new tech, by the way, guys. Yeah. You know, people are still coming. It's a vaccine. It ain't a vaccine.

It's a new tag, a new delivery method, which has been shown. It has been shown to be toxic. Yeah. This lipid net particle delivery system. So another, let's see, we have specificity. Okay. This is an important one. Let me go to my data.

So is a causing, be in specific populations because if you can think of a population where it's really unlikely to see this cause-effect relationship pick that population and see if it's happening so you wouldn't expect massive heart attacks in healthy young athletes right and you wouldn't expect them in children i would i would assume everybody would agree with that statement so we are seeing that and it's it's statistically significant in both of these groups. So everybody is hearing, well, I don't know if everybody is, but there are stories about athletes dropping debt.

We have a video that we've put out a video with the high wire that I think we have now over 100 cases of athletes falling, you know, crashing in many times face first, not even protecting themselves from immediate arrest, grabbing their chests. some of them ending up dying. And, you know, I've been attacked by fact checkers and news agencies saying you have no proof that the vaccine caused that. And I said, but I am not saying that it did what I'm saying. And I'm asking my audience, do you ever remember a time where we saw hundreds of athletes around the world all suffering a similar cardiac event while playing? I mean, that's just, you know, here we are.

We have a product that was not properly safety tested. It did not, it did not remain in a controlled environment where it should have under, you know, close scrutiny of good doctors. They gave it to the world and said, we'll have to see if there's any events. Well, if we can't question this, if we can't say, I don't ever remember a time, then who is going to respond if we have made a tragic error? And as you've said, we now have specific knowledge that this spike protein does cause heart-slip. swelling does cause blood clots. So is it, you know, is it, is it plausible, I guess is the words, is it plausible that a athlete who's the top of their health grabs their chest and collapses over or is getting blood clots that is being caused by the vaccine? Well, it has an element in it that is

designed to do exactly that. Yeah. And you make such a beautiful point. And it goes back to the simplicity of science. A really good question, everybody needs to ask themselves, if they're still having doubt about whether there's a connection here is what was happening before and what's unique to 2021 because that's really what's standing out in all the data that we're looking at, not just the adverse event data. It's also something that we're seeing in in publications. And so the specificity also applies to, and I already showed you the myocarditis slide. I mean, even the CDC has this in one of their present. presentations.

So there you go. It's off the charts. We've shown this before, folks. Here you can see in males. The expected natural background rate one year before they were getting vaccines would have been one to five in the amount of males they were looking at. After vaccination, 116 of them ended up having myocarditis. I mean, just multiple times you go down that list.

It kind of just gets worse and worse. But you're right. Even the CDC has admitted there is a direct relationship. and it's across age groups, it's dose dependent, all of these things, yet they seem to feel fine putting children at this risk when they literally have a 0% chance of dying. You know, there's a number in there's like 0.00. You'll eventually get to a number, but it's, you know, in the zero category of risk in children, yet they're putting in a much higher risk of heart injury.

Not only that, but they're promoting the mildness of mylesness. myocarditis in the context of your little people. Yeah. I'm comedian and I have some connections with Canadian people and groups. And I was told that they're passing out flyers at some person's child school. It's like a flyer telling the parents, don't worry if your child gets mildcarditis from the injections. It's not, it won't hurt them. It's mild.

It'll pass. It's just, I told her, listen, you have to keep. you have to keep those flyers because in 30 years, if we get past this, you got to frame it and show it to your great-grandchildren and say, look at how crazy we were. It'll be right up there in the museum next to the pregnant woman smoking cigarettes saying, you know, nine out of ten doctors recommend this while pregnant, you know, so that's where we're at. So as you look at the data, as we sort of wrap this up, it's so brilliantly laid out. And of course, if we want to get into more details, there's so much more that you've written about, I don't want to rush. everyone through it, you have a substack, but what's the best place to track

and read the stuff you're putting out there? I guess this is it, jesikar.substack.com? That's right. Okay, everybody did. Go ahead. My substack is a new thing to me. I love it. It's like, it's a great way to,

I write scientific papers as well. So I started doing this, as a way to write notes for myself as I'm writing a paper. So I'm writing another paper on pathonomonic markers in myocarditis right now with Peter McCullough, I hope. And so it turned into this wonderful way to get how I explain things to say the layman about what's happening in bears,

what's happening in this new paper that came out in the Lancet and why is it not true? How does the immune system work? I mean, you know, there's so many things on there that I've written that I think have value for just about anybody. So, and I also have a website which I've, it's more geared toward bears. I have some, here it is, Jessica's Universe.com. It has absolute numbers, some analysis, every single interview I've done, presentations, my papers, So it has a lot of things on there that you can check out.

And I wish you would. All right. Just my last question to you. You know, I think there's a lot of relief being felt, certainly here in the United States of America. If you're in New York and California, maybe like Della, I don't know what we're talking about. And we are an international show where Australia is still, you know, locked down, lots of issues there. But a lot of people feel like, you know, the clouds have parted. We're through this.

This is behind us. Is it behind us? and what do you think is important right now? Why are you doing this investigation? Is there something that we need to be looking at and something we need to do and be focused on right now as a society that's just gone through this experience? So we're going through an experience.

We're not through this by any stretch of imagination. From the point of becoming leaders in helping the people who are still going to be injured from this we need to band together as a species I know that sounds dramatic but I really think that we do the I equate what's happened here to the housing market crash back in 2007 and 8 where instead of the regulatory bodies for the financiers turning a blind eye the ratings agencies and and basically resulting in this you know world economic crash

We have our health regulatory bodies turning a blind eye. And we need to either shake them up enough so that they start doing their jobs properly, or we need to reconstruct them from the bottom up, because they're the people that protect us from the pharma companies that don't, they're not incentivized to heal. They're incentivized by profit. That's their business model. So we need our regulatory. We need to shake them up. We need to change that part of this equation very quickly. I don't know how, but talking about it, I think certainly helps because if we can get a larger proportion of the population, just in questions,

then we have a much better chance of turning the situation around. Amen. Jessica Rose, thank you for your work. Thank you for joining us today and laying it out so clearly and reasonably. Obviously, there's a connection and you're proving that. Everyone check out her substack, jessica's universe.com. Awesome work. We'll continue to follow you and I look forward to having you on again soon. I love it. All right. And later. Sounds good. Take care. All right. Look, folks, we're going to keep talking about this. You know, we have a lot of work to do. We have got to make changes. Now that the momentum and the wins at our backs, I will tell you this. If you feel like it's time to go back to sleep, then you never woke up.

So please stay with us. We have work to do here. We're going to talk about a huge show coming up. I'm going to talk to Aaron Siri, the man, the myth, the legend behind the legal team that does the work for ICANN. Huge lawsuit win in Washington, D.C. Probably our biggest to-date setback shutting down the minor consent for vaccination, 11-year-olds. We're being allowed to vaccinate themselves without parental permission. I'm going to talk to Aaron about that and many of the other legal updates we have coming down the line. Then a really powerful heartfelt story about a family hanging in the balance, a child who is

in the future going to need a kidney transplant. And now that may be thwarted, his dreams are being affected by COVID, by these vaccines. We're going to get into that. But first, it's time for it to Jackson Report. How you doing? How you doing, Del? Great to be back with you. What do we got this week? All right. Well, we're seeing some movement these last couple weeks, and it's moving in one direction. And let's see if you can see what the direction is. So Idaho House, we have political, we have social, we have some big businesses moving. So let's look at the political piece right here, some legislation. The Idaho House approves a bill that

prevents and fines vaccine requirements. So they're putting up a stop gap measure here for these things. It says in here, the bill prevents businesses in the state from refusing service, product, admission to a venue or transportation to people who have not received the coronavirus vaccine. It also prohibits businesses from requiring a coronavirus vaccination as a term of employment and less required by federal law. Interestingly enough, it also adds to it here. The measure would also prevent local government entities like school districts from requiring coronavirus vaccines. Wow, getting out of head.

Over to, you know. Yeah, I mean, just the whole gamut there, just throwing it right at the wall. Moving over to New Hampshire, New Hampshire, they have now have a bill that is, went through. New Hampshire House approves bill to allow pharmacists to dispense Ivermectin for COVID-19. And remember, the pharmacists were the ones that were really impeding this process because they were refusing to fill the orders of Ivermectin for people that wanted it for COVID-19. So now in New Hampshire, pharmacists can do that without worrying about losing their license.

I know, there's so many people watching right now saying it's amazing. You need a law for a safe and effective drug that's been used and is on the list of, you know, the Nobel Prize winning, you know, products by the WHO and that you need a law saying a pharmacist is allowed to fill a prescription. This is the world we live in. And thank you, New Hampshire, for stepping up. Hopefully other states can follow. Yeah. Yeah.

And now let's move over to Big Banks, New York City, J.P. Morgan Chase. they're making some moves here too. Headline J.P. Morgan to resume hiring unvaccinated individuals drop the mask mandate. This was a memo on April 4th. They're going to end the mandatory testing of employees that are unvaccinated. They're going to stop requiring employees to report COVID-19 infections. So under J.P. Morgan's roof, COVID no longer exists. They don't even want to deal with it anymore.

And this goes right into the airlines. We've covered them for the last six months or so. A lot of back and forth with the employees there, United Airlines, which has had their unvaccinated employees in limbo just sitting there because they were not allowed to work. They can come back on the job now. And here's the headline on that, more information. United Airlines will let unvaccinated employees return to their job this month. That's March 28th.

This is a huge win. Now, this was only for the workers who avoided this vaccination mandate by claiming that medical, religious exemption, like we were continuing telling the people, get this on file, get this on record. And we did a lot of work, actually. We had Aaron's theory, you know, his legal team had a, whole room full of people taking in those phone calls, helping those of you, you know, fill out this paperwork. So victory is yours. Well done. Everybody there at United Airlines. Absolutely. And sticking with the airlines here, we have a group of 10 CEOs that are asking Biden

to drop the health restrictions on the airlines. This was the CDC and TSA working in tandem. They put those restrictions like masking and pre-departure testing requirements until April 18th. Now, these CEOs sent this letter to the Biden administration telling him to drop those. This includes Delta Air, UPS, American Air, Southwest Airlines. I mean, they're going full force to stop this thing before they even have to, you know, either re-up it on April 18th or re-look at that. So that's good. And I remind everybody, too, that I personally, Del Bigtree am suing Joe Biden,

Health and Human Services, CDC, FDA, all these folks involved with mask mandates on planes. I'm trying to fly to get to you, to speak to you, just like I'm going to fly. to LA for the biggest freaking party we've ever had. I don't want to have to wear a mask on the plane to get there, neither do you. I don't know if the lawsuit will come up soon enough. Hopefully Joe Biden pulls this back and it all becomes unnecessary, but it's nice to be joined by these CEOs of the effort

while I have a lawsuit hanging in the balance. I'm over it, I'm tired of it, you're all a bunch of hypocrites. We don't live in a world where, you know, you have a different life as a politician not wearing masks on planes. We have photos of you where I'm being forced to wear one. one. So it's time for equality back in this country. And speaking of that, we have Brooklyn basketball

player, Kyrie Irving. He's stuck with integrity. He stuck with his personal choice. He did not get the vaccine. He's been in and out of the media lately. Here's the headline now. Irving unvaxed Yanks and Mets can play at home as New York City to lift Vax mandate for athletes. Now, this is New York City, Eric Adams. He's lifting this mandate for only, I guess, high net worth athletes. But New York City workers, firefighters, ambulance workers, health care workers, they're not getting that. I'm sure that's going over really well in New York. You know, let them eat cake, he might as well have said to the plebeians as the stars. But Kyrie Irving, I think what he put up, like 43 points last night or something like that.

Absolutely, absolutely. Proving the unvaccinated, do it better. That's right. And now showing people getting back on their jobs, we have a problem in the UK. there's some people that aren't in their jobs that should be there. And those are the unvaccinated health care workers. And what's that causing? Check out this headline and just really buckle up for this thing.

NHS, national health system waiting list hits another record high. Now 6.1 million are stuck in cues for routine ops like hip and knee replacements, including 310,000 who've been on the books for over a year. This is a gigantic problem in Europe they're calling, especially in France. They're calling these places medical deserts because there's not enough health care. workers to help even though there's health facilities in in these areas. And so in France, we move there because there's a political election coming up. It's voting starting April 10th. It will be over April 24th, exactly one month. And this is really a bellwether as we sit here in America. This is the

first election kind of post-COVID that we're seeing people have a choice to either stick with their leaders that really brought these restrictions down. Remember in France, we're showing video after video of people getting beaten in the streets and the Vax passports and everything. We have a politician, Eric Zemore, he was recently at a rally he held. He is running for prime minister against Macron. This is what he had to say. Check it out. And I reintegrate, at all the best, the medicine and the soigniants who were

chased from the hospital because he refused to be vaccinated. We have a good. Fantastic. I mean, we're talking about basically president, a national figure running on a on an unvaxed platform, you know, amazing. I mean, that is a huge, huge development. That cheer sounded pretty dang big there. Yeah, absolutely.

And this is kind of one of the planks, obviously, of his voice out there. But in the media, this is where it looks like in France, the necessary reintegration of non-vaccinated caregivers into the hospital. This is all over the headlines. And then this, let's rehabilitate our non-vaccinated caregivers. This was signed by 21 parliamentarians to get these non-vaccinated nursing staff back on the job. And they make the case in this pledge. And they say at the end of it, it is therefore absolutely essential to abolish this vaccination obligation for caregivers to rehabilitate without wasting a minute,

these thousands of men and women unworthably treated by the French state and to grant them finally respect and recognition. Wow. Against Macron, the next in line here that looks like she's really going to give him a run for his money is Marine Le Pen. She is a politician. She's a member, I'm sorry, a lawyer, a member of the National Assembly of France. And she called these taking out these nurses a scandal. She called it brutal. She called it absolutely stupid when patients are in need of care.

So you have biting at the heels of Macron trying to get this prime minister, the second term. You got these people saying all of these things and really using a major plan. of the platform to rehire the unvaccinated health care workers. And so what's Macron doing about this? This is the headline out of here. Macron unveils vision for second term. He's mainly leaning against the Ukraine war and trying to draw up support there. But he's done no debates. He's done no rallies yet. His campaign motto, get this, is stronger and happier together. I think he's hoping people are going to forget about this headline from just a couple months ago. French uproars, Macron vows to piss off unvaccinated. Remember, he,

about to make their life more difficult by shutting them out of shopping centers and cafes and cinemas. It's fascinating, but we're keeping an eye on that here at the high wire because this is really going to be a bellwether to what the rest of the world and especially this country moving into the midterms. As we're speaking about prime ministers, let's head over to the European Union where Justin Trudeau showed up there and he was welcomed for his visit there at the EU parliament as such. Check out some of these videos. would have been more appropriate for Mr. Trudeau, Prime Minister of Canada, to address this House according to Article 144, an article which was specifically designed to debate violations of human rights, democracy and the rule of law,

which is clearly the case with Mr. Trudeau. Premier Trudeau. Sloboda, Pravo-isbora, right on life and health and health, Pravo-na-rade, for many of us, those are temerna human rights for who are millions of the world

have been given in the world have been in the world. For the overranu of our rights and the rights our children, who have we sticierceding, many of us, including and me, we're ready to risked

to the freedom and to of their lives, the life And, now are and they are

those those those the – – – modern

of the – of the of the quasliberal chisme – –

posta symbol – – how conchimagas, women, as a chan-hraining blocker bank-raught

bank-raughts, that they can't pay the kids school-e that they can't pay lique and not pay the

money, that not not to ... Prime Minister who openly admires the Chinese basic dictatorship

who tramples on fundamental rights by persecuting and criminalizing his own citizens, as terrorists just because they dared to stand up to his perverted concept of democracy should not be allowed to speak in this house at all. Mr. Trudeau you are a disgrace for any democracy please spare us your presence thank you.

For you, for you, maybe liberal methods. Mejutim, for many of the world, it is dictator of the worst-vrifice. that the people of the world, are not so much the regime who wants to unistit the freedom, be it,

bomb, or it, or stetning, pharmaceutical products. Thank you. Boy, them's fighting words. I can't imagine

being the one sitting like Trudeau had to in that room, the European Parliament hearing his name being spoken about words like dictator and, you know,

freedom being taken away from your citizens, and a liberal boot, powerful statements, shocking. Right. And, you know, at the beginning of this broadcast, L, you played a video of Bill Gates talking about the COVID vaccine push. He called it a test of trust in people's politicians and health care systems. And he said, we didn't do as well as we thought.

And he said, we went from basically, as Trudeau said, a fringe minority to a meaningful minority of people that are now questioning vaccines. Well, this is actually being represented here in Iowa and a number of. new poll. So check this out. This is beyond COVID vaccines. Iowaan support for non-COVID vaccine requirements in school erodes Iowa poll fines. And it says here, just 34% of Iowa adults now say all children should be required to receive standard shots unless they have a doctor signed statement showing they have a medical reason not to be vaccinated. The poll shows. That's down from 59% who supported such requirement in 2015 when the Iowa poll asked a similar question about childhood

vaccination. Now, it's huge. Let's take a look at this poll here. It's a pie graph, and it can show you really the distribution of what we're looking at here. So in the dark blue, that's that 34% that thinks that all the vaccines should be required. Now, the rest of that, basically you're looking at 63% roughly that will want an allowance of a medical exemption, religious exemption. We have 28% want no vaccination laws at all. This is a major sea change here. And it's what Bill Gates' nightmare has been all about. And it's kind of really at his hands in the hands of people like Fauci who push so hard for these COVID vaccines.

Once again, now they've been reduced to at best a meaningful minority. That proves what I'm saying. We are now the majority. We are now the majority of people that want to not just defeat the COVID vaccine mandate, defeat all mandates, all control of our children. Our children are not property of the United States government. We're going to win this, folks. But boy, do we have to like get out there, get up.

The momentum is on our side. let's let's finish this now let's get back our total and complete medical freedom so exciting absolutely and you know if you notice something in the media fouchy's been for the most part absent from regular media appearances we used to see him two and three times a week and that's created this vacuum and who stepped into that vacuum well looking at it it looks like the CEO of Pfizer has stepped in there and here's he's this is albert burla he's laughably trying to think he can make public health guidance. Take a listen to this clip. Do you think that we will every fall have to prepare ourselves for a booster shot with COVID just like we get a flu shot? I think so.

Any variants are coming and Omogon was the first one that was able to evade in a skillful way, the immune protection that we were giving. But also we know that the duration of the protection doesn't last very long. So what we are trying to do and we are working very diligently right now it is to make not only a vaccine that will protect again all variants, including omega, but also something that can protect for at least a year. So you've seen some of that data on a fourth dose, a second booster shot. You think it will be necessary. It is necessary a fourth boost right now.

I actually like this. I like this that Borla is out there because let's just pull back the curtain completely, shall we? We don't need a Tony Fauci going out and parroting what we know is what he's being mandated. by the pharmaceutical industry that owns our nation, owns our politicians, owns our media. This is where we're at, folks. They blatantly are like, oh, screw it.

It's over anyway. We're going to go ahead and just show you who's making decisions for you, those that are making billions of dollars off of you. Pfizer is now writing and is on television promoting your next mandated booster. This is great. I mean, at least people always said,

we need to sort of see like the race cars. We should see who's sponsoring you. Screw that. Just put the sponsor in the race car. There we go. The sponsor is the one that is forcing you into these draconian measures so that you will take their multi-billion dollar product. Fantastic. Right. It's finally like accidental transparency. Yeah, it really is. And the more he speaks, the more questions we have to ask. I mean, we can pick apart this clip forever. But it's fascinating. And he says we looked at the science. You need the fourth booster. Well, we looked at some of the science. And I don't know what science he's looking at, but this is what we found. Check out this study. It's a recent study. Four doses of the inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine redistribute

hemoral immunity responses away from the receptor binding domain. So what it says here, and remember, the receptor binding domain is that lock in that you want the antibodies to lock into. It says our data indicated that the third dose is the, quote, turning point for repeated vaccination of inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccines made from the ancestral viral strain. We observed a clear suppression of your moral response to the fourth dose. That ain't good. It goes on to say, as a result of such suppression, peak levels of S-binding, RBDS receptor binding domain binding and RBDNABS, that's the neutralizing antibodies. That's the gold standard here. We're all inferior to their counterparts after the third dose. Now, let's look at a chart what they're talking about here. So they're looking at

the peak doses here in this immune exhaustion graph. And it's showing that, that the first dose there at the bottom four weeks, that's the peak there with the neutralizing antibodies. Then they pump it up again with that second dose and you get a stepped progress. You get it up there. You get 3.1 times the neutralizing antibodies. Then a third dose, you get 2.5 times up there.

Now the fourth dose, after two weeks, this is where it peaks. It's lower. In fact, it's 18% lower according to this study. So it's kind of like either like blowing up a balloon with a hole in it or pumping up a tire with a hole in it. You're pumping as hard as you can. You're blown in that balloon as hard as you can, but you're not getting the air in there.

It's just going out. And that's what's happening here. So that's those peak, these are the peak values. It's basically like, you know, when we keep vaccine, what they're saying is, you know, it's going after receptor binding domain. It's doing what it's trying, what the vaccine is designed to do. But by the fourth dose, it's like the immune system just says, I'm failing, man. I have locked this door every way sideways, yet they're still coming in here.

I mean, they're still injecting the spike protein. And so the body's going, it must not be about the front door. let me go look somewhere else and it gives up the job and then releases that front door to just open up to the virus while it's looking for something else to attack. It literally just thinks our immune system is just saying something's failing here. It's not working. I'm not going to attack the part that I need to. Let me go to some part of the virus that's irrelevant. And so it's moving its response, which is really, and we've been talking about this, right?

We've been talking about immune exhaustion. This is a little bit different, but it's sort of what that would look like, right? Like the immune system is just not putting up a fight anymore. It's totally giving up. The fourth dose is just making it throw in the towel. It's lost its confidence. Our immune system is losing its confidence by the fourth dose. Yeah, and it goes to another, what you were talking about there,

it kind of goes to the back door to another subunit. And this is what the authors found. In fact, they said it right in the paper here. This is the quote, our data reveal that immune responses could not be endlessly elevated, while suppression of heightened immune responses focusing on one subunit together with a shift of immune responses to other subunits would occur after repeated vaccination. And so this study was in late February. And we're finding that in real time now, in the real world, in where else is real, this is a place that's really ahead of the rest of the world. Here's the headline out of there.

There's a study that was going on at the Shiba Medical Center, fourth Pfizer jab, ineffective and blocking Omicron. So they were getting blood tests, these health care workers, 150 of them just about and they kept they're getting infected even though their blood test showed an increase in key antibodies and it says enough of them tested positive for coronavirus two weeks after their fourth jazz to indicate that the level of antibodies needed to protect against infection from amicron was probably too high for the vaccine to induce says rajiv yashi so that's exactly what we're seeing with that study showed is they couldn't get the antibodies up high enough to make any effect on this thing and we're seeing it in the in europe the european medicines agency is saying

we shouldn't we shouldn't even boost anymore so check this out this is the headline frequent boosters spur warning on immune response their their head EMA's head of vaccine strategy is basically saying we need to find a way to live with this thing and an endemic level with the virus as opposed to continuing boosting this is not a strategy we want to do however we have Sajid Javid this is what he's saying get ready for fifth jabs this autumn Saji Javit says over 50s will probably need another COVID booster later this year. Now, he's the UK's version of Tony Fauci, kind of. He makes policy there for the health division. And back in the U.S., talking about real world examples, we have our very own health press secretary, Jen Saki, double vaccinated and boosted. Jen Saki tests positive for COVID

for the second time in five months before White House briefing and is forced a cancelor trip to Europe with Biden, who's there right now. Amazing. I mean, it's literally the definition of insanity. if you keep doing the same thing and having the failed result, then you're nuts. And clearly these people are nuts. And Borla looks panicked, right? He looks like, there's no question about it. You need a fourth dose, which means the people that have received these three doses now have, I think, no immunity. I mean, what happens if we have something that is more deadly or more dangerous than Omicron?

This thing is still mutating. Coronavirus is still out there. You haven't eradicated. These viruses and bacteria all over the place. What happens if we've hurt your immune system so bad? And another bad form of this virus comes along. People are going to be in real trouble. We've talked about it.

Is that antibody dependent enhancement? Maybe not. It's probably more like the antigenic sin. It's looking for the wrong thing. But no matter how you slice it, serious problems on the horizon for those that have been just really believing in this ever-increasing vaccine program. Right. And you mentioned pushing Pfizer CEO Borla out front. It's like accidental transparency.

Remember before the vaccine came out? Right before it came out, they were marketing it. They were saying, look, this MRNA technology has been around for a long time, 20 years. It's been used in cancer cell therapy. Well, listen to Albert Borla talk about how this MRNA vaccine technology was chosen before COVID. Take a look. Okay. MRNA was the technology that we had less experience, only two years working on this.

And actually, MRNA was a technology that never delivered a single product until that day, not vaccine, not any other medicine. So it was very counterintuitive and I was surprised when they suggested to me that this is the way to go and I questioned it and I asked them to justify it. How can you say something like that? But they came and they were very, very convinced that this is the right way to go. They felt that the two years of war on MRNA since 2018, together with Biotech, to develop a flu vaccine, made them believe that the technology is mature and we are at the cusp of delivering a product.

So they convinced me. I mean, that is so amazing. I'm trying to think about, first of all, who is the day he's talking about? I mean, is it like this globalist? Is Klaus Schwab in there recommending this? I mean, I don't know who the day he's talking about, but can you imagine the benefit of hindsight in this conversation?

He's probably sitting there saying, This is counterintuitive to me. I mean, there's no background on this back. We've never used this vaccine before. It's never been in an accident. In fact, it's failed at Moderna. We have been watching them tried to make this product and never deliver a single product. And you're telling me, because let me be perfectly clear here.

Let me be perfectly clear. I do not want to be here one year from now saying you have to get a fourth booster because this thing is a total and freaking disaster. I will not do that. I will not be that guy. It will not be a serious. Calm down. Calm down, Borla.

It's going to be good. Very good. Trust us. And they convinced me. I did it. And in the end, they convinced him. And Borla, we trust now. So he's on a book tour. He's not only trying to get public health policy. Who's going to buy that book? Who wants that book? The world's greatest failure. Oh, my God. What's it titled? I hope nothing more than that. All right. So we talk about on this show quite a bit. We've been out ahead of really any other major media outlets. when it comes to the adverse reactions. So we were on top of the even in the Johnson and Johnson's early trials.

Their thrombosis, when those trials, I think it was a phase two clinical trial had to be paused. We were telling your audience about that. The thrombosis, the myocarditis, the heart inflammation, the fainting, the Bell's palsy. We were reporting on those, all of those first. And what's happening now is we have kind of a next generation, if you will, of adverse events that are being seen in the medical literature. And just to be clear, before we get into this segment, you know, we're told again, fevers, chills, a sore arm, you know, that's really about it. But that's where the talking point is in the media.

Let's check out the medical literature. This is one of the studies from, this isn't in the Scandinavian Journal of Immunology. This was an Italian researcher. And the title is, role of the antigen presentation process, immunization mechanisms of the genetic, those are MRNA, vaccines against COVID-19, and the need for biodistribution evaluations. Remember, that's biodistribution that Dr. Rose was talking about with those nanolipid particles. And it says here, up to now, more than 1,000 peer-reviewed studies evidence a multitude of adverse events in COVID-19 vaccine recipients. Such studies report severe adverse reactions following vaccination, including thrombosis,

thrombocytopinia, myocarditis, pericarditis, cardiac arrhythmias, nervous system disorders, and other alterations. Now, that's a big mouthful compared to some chills and some fevers. Yeah. But let's look at nervous nervous system disorders, central nervous system for that matter. So we have this study now that's come out, among others, a single health system case series of new onset central nervous system, inflammatory disorders, temporarily associated. That's what they say now, temporarily associated with mRNA-based SARS-CoV2 vaccines. And it says here what they found, five cases of post-vaccination, CNS disorders of immune origin. So we're going to go through

this and kind of describe them fatal acute disseminated encephal myelitis that's an autoimmune disease marked by sudden widespread attack of inflammation in the brain and the spinal cord they also found one new onset neuromylitis optica spectrum disorder this is sudden inflammation the optic nerve that's your eye and the spinal cord they found two new clinical onset of ms this multiple scrosis like syndrome and they also observed one meningiocincephalitis so that's the inflammation the meneneges and the brain But so that's one health system. They're looking at that. Five, you could say, okay, there's five.

But now there's, here's another study that came out and it shows the spectrum of, they're calling it a spectrum of a neurological complications following COVID-19 vaccination. They have a flow diagram in here to help understand it because there's so much they're looking at. So this flow diagram here, they break it down of the components of that central nervous system, brain, spinal cord, cranial nerves, peripheral nerves, all the way out to the muscles. And you see here, you know, acute encephalitis. under the cranial nerves, you have that Bell's palsy, you have that optic neuritis they're talking about. Even tinnitus, we're going to talk about the ringing in the ears as being as a symptom.

Yeah. And so you got Guillain-Barray syndrome. It's going all over the board now, and it's affecting these autoimmune central nervous system. And so moving on to another one, we're seeing what's called basically blistering diseases. This is a very interesting one. It's under the autoimmune category, autoimmune mucocutaneous blistering diseases after SARS-COVID. vaccination. So they do a case report of Pemfagas Valgaris and a literature review. And it says here cases of severe autoimmune blistering have recently been reported in association with severe acute respiratory syndrome, coronavirus two SARS-CoV2 vaccination. So people who don't know what this is, this is directly from the study. Let's take a look at what that looks like if you present in the clinic with this or if it happens to be you. These are the pictures. This is in the mouth under the

tongue on the gums. What this does, there's an autoimmune response. Your body actually attacks the proteins that hold those membranes together for those tissues. And that's what's happening right there. Man, you know, I wanted to sort of take a second here to sort of talk to the audience. You know, first of all, if you're not on our newsletter right now, you're missing a great value of what we do here and it's free. You don't have to pay for it. Please join our mailing list. Just go down, put your email in there so that even if it's just one of these studies that strikes your interest or you run into somebody that might be having this issue, you can say, look, here's the study I have in my inbox. Every single thing we're talking about here on this show, all of our

proof, all of our evidence, all of our studies are in your inbox, even the videos, hyperlinks that you can go to to look at this information yourself. So it's so critical. But I want to point out there, and I've said this before, that first of all, we're not trying to tell you what to think. I'm trying to show you how to think, where to look for your information, where we're finding it, And then we're fully transparent with where it's coming from. But I also want to say that here on the highway, we're not attempting to deliver the story first. We don't, you know, the goal is that to say,

hey, we got it. We got it first. What we want to do is make sure that we're getting it right. And so there's a criteria by which we decide whether we're going to run with this story. And normally, I will say this, that this blistering disease might not have made it into this week's show. We just heard about this two days ago. It's a brand new study.

It's just coming out there. I'd like to see a couple more studies. and there's other things we're tracking that we're kicking down the road to see if there's anybody sort of verifying it. But the reason this was interesting to me this week was just prior to being in a meeting where one of our international scientists brought this to our attention. I had received text from a friend who's a nurse. I want to read those to you because I kind of, you know, I kind of go with an instinct. There's almost like a cosmic thing that happens when it's a story we're supposed to follow. This really happens.

So two days before that study you just saw, I received this text. So there are these NICU babies. This is one nurse to my friend that's a nurse. So there are these NICU babies in my hospital. We've blanked it out that have these lesions in the mouth, genitalia and their body. They look a little like herpes, like those photos did sores, but they have tested it for everything, and everything comes up negative. All the doctors have no ideas what these sores are.

The first two babies that had that had these sores died. Currently on the unit, there are two. And then our friend says, have they? tested them for spike protein she responds later I suggested checking for the spike protein the MD's response I don't even know what to do with that and it's not a can of worms I want to open the attending MD today is the NICU director at our hospital medical brilliance of today I don't want to open that can of worms that's the response like you there's no can if there's nothing there if there's no

signal but why not look for it we're not to be going to look for it I mean that is that is horrible We would rather just tell these parents we have no idea what it is than to follow something that has logic, right? As specificity, as we said, there's a temporal association or the people that are vaccinated or the mother's vaccinated, all of this. The reason why I want to show you the story is because when I see a text like that, what it says is we're a part of an investigation here on the high wire. We are not just reporting what we know as facts. Some of this, we're trying to figure it out with you. We're working with scientists and doctors around.

But there's nothing better than a brilliant genius community like we have. here that are reaching millions of people around the world. So I'm putting this to you right now. This is one of the situations that babies are dying in some hospital somewhere of this blistering issue. They're saying they don't know what it is. Well, if it is the vaccine, I'm not saying we have proof that it is. What we're saying is these are the beginning signals. If you have a story or you know somebody you've heard of this, we want to start investigating that. If you have that story, please share that information with us. It'll be totally private. Just go to info at I can decide.org. and we will get deeper into it.

Everyone involved, your friends that may be going through it, all of it will be completely confidential. You will never be forced to tell your story until you're ready. So let that be known. We never share our sources. And a lot of times it's just deep background as we try to uncover what's going on here. Amazing, amazing and quite horrifying.

And Jessica Rose said the same thing, right? Thousands of these injuries are in there from one vaccine and nobody seems to care. Right. And let's finish this with one more injury we need to talk about. We mentioned tinnitus. This is a ring in the ears, a persistent ring in the ears that never goes away. Interestingly enough, a large, a well-known vaccine advocate, vaccine researcher, Gregory

Poland of the Mayo Clinic, he heads up the vaccine research group. He's working on like individual vaccination, better vaccination. He's also trying to better understand the side effects of vaccination. He's been doing this for decades. After his booster, he developed tinnitus. And this is what the headline looked like. This was at MedPage. Vaccine researcher who developed tinnitus after COVID shots calls for further study.

So he's calling it a life-altering event because this is pretty serious. And before we get into his quotes from this here, we're actually able, for the first time in media, to give the viewers an idea of what it's like to feel, you know, a possible, again, I'll say possible temporally associated vaccine adverse reaction. So this is what it sounds like if you all of a sudden wake up and this starts happening to you. I think we have some clips here. These are the different levels of it. Can you imagine if that is going? I mean, I don't know how people sleep. If it just some of 24 hours a day, that ringing is there. It never goes away. You can never turn it down. It's always at 11 no matter what you do.

I understand it's worse at night because that's when things are silent and you get to focus on that. You can't get to by anything. So this is what Poland has to say in his article. They wrote about him in Medpage. He said he continues to receive emails from other, this is after he's went public, he continues to receive emails from other individuals across the country and around the world who say they have also developed tinnitus after COVID vaccination. Poland believes there are there may be tens of thousands of people affected in the U.S. and potentially millions worldwide. He feels strongly that more research should be done to determine what caused these symptoms and what could be done to help people desperate for relief. He says this, listen to this, what has been heartbreaking about this as a

seasoned physician are the emails I get from people that this has affected their life so badly. They have told me that they're going to take their own life, Poland says. So this is not, you know, and in the article it says they quote Pfizer, they quote modern and they said, look, we didn't see this in the study. So we don't really know, you know, we can't, we can't help you out on that. We're going to have to do some research. You know, Mr. Poland, welcome to the life of an anti-vaxxer where everyone denies you. No one and it's the irony of this. It's sad, but this is where we're at, right? Eventually it's going to affect everybody. Now one of those. And he's been pretty, he's been pretty vile towards the anti-vaxers, hasn't he? He's been extremely vocal. This is an

article he did in 2001, understanding those who do not understand, a brief review of the anti-vaccine movement. So he's written about that quite a bit. And then in 2011, he wrote this, it has a little harder, sharper-tonged critique, the age-old struggle against the anti-vaccinationist, vaccinationalist. So it's a beautiful, teachable moment because what he may not know in all his studies that you and I and other people know that have talked to parents is the anti-vaxxer is, you know, before COVID was typically, for the most part, people who had all of their vaccines and had a reaction like him or saw a reaction in their child. and said, wait a minute, I need to question this.

Unfortunately, he stands in a privileged position because he can grandstand and say, we need more studies, we need this. The parents are neutralized. They're neutralized by the anti-vax label. They're neutralized by the media, and they're silenced by social media and big tech. So they have no outlet. So I hope he understands the privileged position he is in in calling for more research. I hope they do more research on this.

There is, tonight is in the literature as a possible temporarily associated event. So what a great, what a great time for him to bring these two worlds together and maybe find some understanding. It's just one of those moments again. I keep thinking of Robert Malone in Washington, D.C. at that incredible rally saying truth is like a lion. You don't have to fight for it. Just let it get out there. It's going to do its own job. Truth is is infectious right now across the world. And you are such a big part of that, Jeffrey Jackson. Thank you for this great work today. Thank you, Del. All right. If you like the Jackson Report, definitely go to the High Wire's website and check out. He writes articles, gets into deeper information. As I said, be on our newsletter. So you can really go through this. We're throwing a lot of science at you. There's a lot we're trying to collate and get together to you in one show.

It takes time. You can take it in doses. But go back. Look at this stuff. This is going to be critical to your health. What happens if it's someone near you, someone in your family? It's the sooner you can diagnose it. The sooner you know what's going on. The sooner you know who to talk to, the better. keep this stuff on hand. Let us help you, help yourself in those type of situations. Okay, an incredible story. You know, I went through a health issue last year that really pointed out that I wasn't taking, you know, enough care of myself. I was out there, you know, trying to do my best to make a difference in the world, but I had let my own health go. And I thought about at times, like, what good am I to my family? I'm overweight. I'm not feeling well. In fact, I'll be totally honest with you. There was a time.

there where I could not do a single pull-up. I remember thinking I couldn't lift myself out of a burning building, let alone anyone else. Luckily, I've remedied that. But what if that really came to you directly? What if directly you started recognizing I have a child that needs me and needs me to be healthy? And I need to do something about this. This is a very interesting story with a lot of different elements, but I think you'll hear that there's a little bit of all of us in Tanner story. My name is Tanner William Donaldson. Our son Tanner is rapidly approaching nine years old. He has a tremendous zest for life, really very outgoing, almost like the mayor of his third grade class.

Busy kid loves basketball, very caring, loves his dog Joe, loves his family, all around great kid. I was 40 when I found out I was pregnant with Tanner. We went in for an ultrasound to find out what the sex of the baby is. and the ultrasound indicated that he had the birth defect that happens early in the development of the baby. So we were like, all right, well, let's just go in and fix it. Well, this isn't something that they could necessarily fix. Around 18 to 20 weeks into my pregnancy with Tanner, the ultrasound kind of uncovered a condition called posterior-earithral valve.

P-U-V happens in just boys, and it distorts the entire urine air. track. Boys have the urethra and there is a valve, this tiny little hair-like valve, that opens and closes. The valve overgrows and blocks any urine from coming out. So if the urine cannot get out of the baby in uteral, the kidneys start to back up. And if he can't get the urine out of him because the blockage he has, then he can't get those lungs to perform the way they need to. See, babies ingest their own urine. It pushes out those bronchial. tubes, develops those lungs, and that's how that works. And then if he's born without lungs, there's nothing they can do.

And I just remember that sinking feeling, but I said, this is our child, we got this. Let's just go down this road and we got it. When Tanner was born, he was crying right away, so we knew he had lungs. I think he came out of her in about four seconds. He wasn't very big. You know, he weighed five pounds at the time, but he was full of urine.

They immediately put a catharine and went, so they broke through the valve that he has and they extracted a pound of urine out of him. So just think of it, 20% of his body weight. He went from weighing five pounds. He really weighed four pounds. He was actually born with the PUV diagnosis and stage three chronic kidney disease. The doctor basically said once the damage is done, it's irreversible. He's going to have kidney problems and he's going to deal with those for the rest of his life. Right around that six, eight-month period, the urologist told us that he's going to need a catheter. My question was, for tonight, how long? She said the rest of his life. Tanner gets a catheter every three hours

to drain that bladder and, again, try to keep his kidney function the best we can. He does sleep with a catheter overnight, so we do have to take his catheter out in the morning. and throughout the day I do have to go into school and do an intermittent cathering procedure with him. We do struggle with the intermittent cathing. You know, telling an eight-and-a-half-year-old, hey, you need to come in from riding your bike and take care of this. You know, we call it, give me five minutes. My favorite things to do for fun is play outside.

If I wasn't sick, I'd be able to do what my friends get to do. Because of my kidney illness, I can't play sports that, like, they can. Tanner has the left kidney that is pretty just atrophied, and the right kidney is functioning at 18 and 20%. So that's kind of the only kidney that's giving him the life that he has right now. Tanner doesn't need a kidney transplant at this moment, but I'll say this, without it, I don't think. his life is long living. It might be 18 years old, 20 years old. I'm a bit nervous. The longer he can

go on his native kidney, the better off he's going to be. I remember sitting there when we first talked about it. He was maybe 18 months old. And I said, well, you know, I'll be his donor then. And I remember the doctor kind of looking at me and looking at my wife and said, she's probably a better candidate. And the reason being is I was pushing 250 pounds. So I remember leaving that meeting. I just said to Jen, I said, man, I failed you as a husband. I'm failing these kids as a dad. From this point forward, I'm going to make my health the most important thing of my life. And I just started one day and said, all right, what do I need to do?

You got to eat better. You got to get up. You got to exercise. And I'm up every morning between either 4 o'clock or 5 o'clock in the morning. I think the last three years at our gym, no one showed up more than me. I'm down 60 pounds from when we started. If I'm the one when they knock on the door and they call on me, that was my responsibility.

I created this family. And it's on my shoulders to get it done. So I remember going back into the clinic and they said, you know, your markers, you're matching four out of five markers, which was great. Only a sibling typically hits five out of five. And just so you know, the more markers you hit, the less anti-rejection medication you need.

And they said, hey, you've done everything you needed to do. to be approved to be his donor. I don't know how many miles I have left on my kidneys, but if it helps him, it's part of being a parent, I think. I am joined now by Tanner's parents, Dane and Jen. Dane and Jen, first of all, thank you for sharing your story with us today. Thanks for having us. We appreciate it. Thank you.

Taking it back to that moment, my wife and I actually went through a troubled pregnancy, and I remember that moment. I'll never forget that day during the ultrasound where, you know, it was clear things were not going right. And, you know, I asked the doctor. And we were sort of shocked in a situation to be told that there's really nothing that can be done. There's only one option for you, which is whether or not you want to decide to abort this child. Was that, what were the options given to you in that moment? Well, that was something that was probably the second thing that was discussed.

First, it was the information of what they're seeing on the ultrasound machine. And next is what the Ohio laws were in terminating the pregnancy. And I was shocked, quite frankly. Yeah, that never entered our mind going in there. We just wanted to know if you were having a boy or a girl. And I remember the nurse saying after the first ultrasound, he wants to see it, the doctor was to see in the next room. Then we have a better ultrasound machine in there.

I just remember, that's very odd. Okay, we'll go. And then again, he said this, you know, was pointed out, this is bladder, shouldn't be able to see it at this stage. He's there his kidneys, shouldn't see him. He's got a blockage there, and I don't want to say I'm a typical guy. So we're going there and fix it, you know, and he said, you can't just go fix it, Dane, we'll fix it if he's born.

And I picked up on the if, and I was like, whoa. And then he said, whatever you do, just don't go Google. posterior erythral valves in any conditions. Well, what do you think I did three seconds after walk rather? Yeah. And so our world came crashing down pretty quick. Well, just it just the reality hit very quickly of what to do next. So. And then how did you make it through that? Did you have conversations? I know I'm throwing a curveball at you because I know this wasn't a question, but I have been there. And I know those conversations, you know, do we continue with the pregnancy? of course for us, and clearly you did too, we decided no matter what. And I guess I'm bringing it up

because, Dean, I remember saying something very similar to my wife, which was, we love each other. This is just our experience. This child is beautiful. No matter what happens, this is our experience. Was it difficult to sort of come to that sort of decision? More so than I thought. And I'm always speaking, I can't speak for John, just speak for my part. I'm adopted. So thinking of, you know, having an abortion just didn't, I couldn't even say the word. They called it, they called it a termination specialist would be assigned to us if we wanted to. And, you know, and how many weeks out it could be. And they had us tour like part of the hospital where the sick kids, like really, really sick kids were at. And it was heartbreaking for us. And then I remember, you know, just asking, I was like,

I hate to say, is this all we're dealing with? And, you know, the doctor that we had was very calm. And he said, you know, let's do an amniocentesis. And so we did. And everything came back that, yep, you're only dealing with kidney failure and obviously urinary track issues. Everything else is good. And for the two days when we had to make this decision, and I talk a lot, I don't think I said a word, Jen and I, we couldn't hardly look at each other.

Neither of us wanted to make a decision. It was way more challenging than I ever thought. But ultimately, I couldn't live with any other decision that we had. This is what we created. This was God's plan for us. And we looked at each other and said, these are our cards. Let's play the best hand we can with these cards. Jen, as the mother, you're carrying this child inside of you, you know,

And to have that beat, like you're directly involved with the help this child. And what was that pregnancy like knowing that, you know, and also there's a bit of a race against time, isn't there? If this goes, if this goes gets out of control, the blockage becomes too serious, this baby might not make it. How did that affect you as a part of your body and your experience of the pregnancy? Right. It was a reminder. We had to go through ultrasounds every week. And it was a reminder each time, although it was great to see my son every week, but it was a reminder just how difficult this road may be with him as each week went by.

But I knew immediately when I saw him, even when we were told his condition, he's going to come to this earth and we're going to do the best we can as parents. all right well thank you for sharing that i mean i know that's very private but i think for people i just know when we were going through the situation that we had that nobody ever talks about you feel all alone and yet you realize as you tell your story so many people out there are going through very similar experiences so so dane you know we see in there this discussion obviously your son is going to need a kidney and you recognize i'm not even the you know i'm not even the candidate i i should be and so you really said about and it's a great motivator right i mean there's not a better motivation in the world than being there for your child what did it feel like the moment that the

hospital told you you have achieved all of that work trying to get there your your kidney is going to be great for your child what was that moment like after all that it was you know i i put it right next to having the birth of my two children and marry my wife you know it It was just, it was a culmination. It was not, you know, anybody that struggled with weight loss or any of this stuff. You know it. You don't, you don't get large overnight and you certainly can't reverse it overnight. So it was, you know, years of eating right and exercising and foregoing things.

And I don't want to say losing friendships, but if I wasn't out at the bar eating wings and drinking beer till midnight, somebody else took my spot there. So, you know, I had a singular task in mind, and that was to be the best version I could of myself and make myself harder to kill, whether that's a car accident, that's given up a kidney, that's tackled on a virus, whatever it is, and just trying to become the single best version of myself, which is not, there's no end point to it. You just can't, I can't stop today and just say, okay, we're there. let's hit the pause button, cruise control.

Well, you look great. Obviously, you did a fantastic job. So for those of you that are watching right now, everything is great. You know, Dane is passed with flying colors. His kidney is available to his son. But remember, all of this took place before the COVID pandemic. Then when the pandemic hit, that changed everything. When the pandemic hit, I was just worried more.

more so about if his health declined, would we be able to do this process because so many things were shut down? Getting in to get his labs, you know, possible for, you know, those first couple months. I contracted COVID August of 2020 as well as my husband, but you know, I'm an avid crossfitter as well as my husband. So exercise is very important to us.

eating all organic as natural as possible. And with a few extra supplements, we recovered beautifully. So October this year, 2021, that we saw the first one hit the news. A decision by Cleveland Clinic to make vaccines mandatory for anyone involved in a kidney transplant surgery. I saw that and I thought, well, that wouldn't pertain to us. We've been in the system for his whole life. And all they've done is recruit us to stay there, that Tanner is a perfect candidate for this transplant. And you guys are going to do so well together as a family.

So I was like, it wouldn't pertain to us, especially since I've had COVID. I can prove to them I have natural immunity. So on October 4th of this year, 2021, I received an email from kidney transplant and pancreatic transplant that every recipient and living donor would need to get the COVID-19 vaccination. The Cleveland Clinic is going to start requiring donors to be fully vaccinated. So I thought, hey, their job is to do no harm. They know that I'm the best option for Tanner. So right away, Jennifer said, well, let's meet with whoever made this decision.

The meeting was set up. They're all there. most of them in that room know us well. Tanner's doctor, the doctor that would pull the kidney from me, the doctor that would put it in to Tanner, and I asked them, why would I have to happen? Because you could get COVID while we're transplanting you to your son. Guys, you're going to cut my body open,

remove an organ that I need to function. And you think my concern would be I could get COVID. I tell you, Jen lost it sitting there. I looked them each in the eye. And, you know, there was a lack of humanity there. They've made the decision that the vaccine is more important than saving my son's life. What, take me to that moment. I mean, I, you know, I can't imagine as a father.

I can't imagine my wife in that situation. You know, the life of your child is what you're talking about. And they're literally putting a red tape around that and not letting you access it. What is that moment? What is the emotion you're feeling in that moment? Anger. Frustration. You just, all I really was hoping for dialogue.

And what it was is we know better than you no matter what. And again, I'm not speaking at all of them. I'll go into as much detail as you like. But my emotions were raw. They were angry. I was scared, frustrated, you know, not hopeless, but where do we turn? What are the next options? These are the same people, again, that for nine years begged us to stay there.

And I don't believe that the doctors that, were in there made these decisions, I think they're carrying out the orders. I will say that. We wanted to meet with the decision makers and they weren't the ones there. So. Wow. And so we're talking about the Cleveland Clinic. I mean, this is one of the biggest hospitals, you know, one of the best hospitals. I worked on the doctor's television show as a producer. We worked with the Cleveland Clinic all the time. Truly a fantastic, you know, hospital system. records in so many different departments but as you said they had been selling you on staying with them you did everything there you know and yet in this moment you know as as a mother

what were your thoughts well as my husband said we've we've done everything we've been through many many years of doing the right things, monthly labs with Tanner, every 90 day visits, I complied with everything. And again, when I got the email regarding this COVID vaccination, I thought, too, thought the same thing. It's not going to apply to us. We're already in the system. We're already approved.

This is, you know, taking a kidney from my husband and giving it to my son. So I was deeply hurt by this decision. So that's why I called a meeting. You know, Del, when we asked, go ahead. No, go ahead, go ahead. I was going to say, you know, one of the things I asked when I looked them at them, I said, all right, with having the T cell immunity, here's my test that I had it. And knowing that I've had it and my body reacted fine, I was down maybe four days on a Tuesday.

I mowed lawn on Saturday. We were prepared for it here at home. And I asked them, what medical benefit could I receive? What I receive? What is the upside for me to receive this vaccination? Looked around the room. Yeah. The infectious disease doctor said it would shorten your time that you would have COVID.

And I said, so I would go from four days down to three days. days. And, you know, and again, I was being, you know, a little bit of a jerk. And I can tell that we were never going to meet on the same playing field. And then Jen asked one question at that moment that just kind of stopped everything. And she said, can I ask you this question? They said, sure. She said, if he takes the vaccine and his body has a reaction to it, is it a possibility that he cannot donate his kidney? Whether it's a vaccine. myocarditis or his kidney function drops or anything like that. Is that a possibility? Yes, that's a possibility. So now I have no upside and all downside. And I told them, well, we're willing

to sign any type of waiver against COVID, the whole nine yards, you know, and they all have, they've all had COVID and we had COVID, you know, I mean, what's, I just couldn't get it. And, you know, at that point in time, you can see Jen, Jen had lost, I mean, here come the tears. and everything. I tried to hold as strong as I could. The one gentleman, the surgeon that was, has worked with me from Fat Dane to now watching everything go on. You know, when he came up at the end, he shook my hand, looked me in the, I could tell he did not agree with what was going on. At least if he did, he was a great actor, but I can tell there's that he didn't agree with this. And, you know, again, we're not taking it away from somebody else.

This is from a father to a son. We've been in their system this whole time. I've done all the work that they're asking me to do, and you can't prove one medical benefit that I would get by it. So just to be clear, Tanner is not in that life-threatening moment at the moment. This is all prepping. You know, currently, I think it said in the story we did with you, He only has one working kidney and it's approximately, what, an 18% is that what I understand, 18% function level.

So it's getting close, right? It's getting close to having that emergency moment and now you're not even in the system. Can I ask you how you've discussed this with Tanner? Is he aware of the conversation or what's going on or do you just keep this all to yourselves? We've had the discussion with them. Yeah. Yeah. He, you know, as much as what a nine-year-old can comprehend.

Yeah. We don't go in there and say, hey, we have no options for you. You know, but we talk about, you know, these are the things that we've done. Here's our beliefs. Here's what we see. And, you know, we didn't get here overnight. We understand our health and our immune system and what we're after and what we're trying to provide to him.

So, you know, you asked, does he need it today? We, the clinic in us, we have always talked about preemptive transplant. We were never going to let him get to. And I say we, the clinic and in our family, ever let him get to a place that he would go on dialysis, spike his blood pressure, everything else that goes along with it. It was if it drops to that 15% function, and we can't stabilize that in 60 to 90 days with medication adjustments

and other things. We need to be ready. So it's always about, you know, yep, ready to rock right now. We get the phone call, you know, fast for a couple days and we're downtown and, you know, getting the surgery done and moving on to the next phase of his treatment. It's amazing to me that, and I'm sure you sit there every day with the news as more and more the reality of this vaccine being a complete failure, the restrictions being let up. Our show just showed politicians all over the world saying this is the best. biggest mistake we've made yet you're in this hospital system that is in the dark ages on this

conversation as it were just to point out in all transparency part of the reason we know your story is you've been working with our legal team at Aaron Siri so he has sent a couple letters on your behalf first of all what was the first letter what was the goal of the first letter sent by Aaron Siri to the Cleveland hospital system I think the goal was to to, well, at least our understanding, we wanted them to just, yeah, respect the, respect our rights. Maybe you have another conversation. I would have been open to another conversation with the decision makers.

And with the natural immunity, and we used their own study. When I was in there, I had their own study about natural immunity and how they tested it. And the infectious disease, doctor said, we didn't test that long enough. Yet at that time, the vaccine had been out four months. But so, you know, so our goal has always been to come to the table. Let's have a discussion. Let's not paint every situation with a broad brush. Yeah.

Let's take a look at our individual situation, my health, Tanner's health, in how we could go about, you know, finding a resolution. So one letter was sent, yep, one letter was sent was not responded to, You've just sent a second letter, I believe yesterday, Aaron, Sirius sent a second later. Let's just take a follow-up letter. Let's take a look at that. I think I have it somewhere.

Where's the monitor? There it is. The hospital must provide Tanner and Mr. Donaldson the opportunity for a religious exemption and conduct the procurement and transplant surgeries for all the reasons stated here, and we request response by 5 p.m. Eastern on March 30th, 2022, Tanner and Dr. Donaldson reserve all rights. essentially you are ready to do what is necessary, right? I mean, this is your child hanging in the balance.

I want to try and help you today. I think that there's nothing better than public opinion, and the Cleveland Clinic, you know, needs that good press. We need to reach out as a community. So I want everybody that's watching this show. Let's help this family out. It shouldn't have to come to get into a courtroom. We want you to reach out to the clinic themselves.

So here is that information. Contact, the Cleveland Clinic. There's their phone number. You can share this story on social media at Cleveland Clinic and just put hashtag, let Tanner live. That's the hashtag we're putting together. Let's tell them how important it is to stick with the science here that we know that Dane has got the best immunity that there is to offer, which is the natural immunity. It's the longest lasting immunity. This is insanity.

if they continue to treat this situation with a lack of reasonability, then we will broadcast to the world and continue to put pressure. This is what we can do as a society and as really a family together in this. And so we have a very active audience, Jen and Dane. And so I think that you can expect that they're going to be getting some phone calls today. Go ahead. No, no, no, you go ahead. And that's exactly what we want.

We, you know, again, honestly, we didn't want that at all. We wanted to just continue on like, hey, moving forward, everybody that's coming forward, we're going to request this. But if you've been in our system before, we're going to go ahead and grandfather you in. You're going to move right through it. Unfortunately, it's come down to this. We didn't want to make this a national, even a local thing. We just wanted to, you know, provide our son with the best possible treatment we could.

What we were promised from the beginning. Right. And I was willing, I'm willing to do that work. And, you know, again, there's still no guarantee that my kidney's going to be fine inside of him. So there's just, it's a frustrating situation. But from our stance for you and the help that you have provided and Elizabeth over there with. Searing Glimstad. They are fantastic. And we really, really appreciate it. And the other part that we looked at is we want our story now told because we think there's other people out there that may not be in the same situation with a very honest, heartwhelming story. But their story to them is the most important one. So if this is a domino effect and can get one hospital.

to fall that causes another one, then that's what we're after. You know, I mean, again, we just want some common sense dialogue, which we've had zero. Right. Well, that's what we're after too. Thank you for sharing your story. I believe you're right. There are people that are suffering in this insane world that has lost all reality and humanity and reasonability. We need to work to get back to that. That's part of the work that we need to do is we rebuild this country in the world.

in the world and certainly medicine get back to the Nuremberg Code and the original oath of do no harm. These doctors are doing harm if they continue on this path and we'll make sure the world knows it. Thank you for taking the time to share your story and certainly give that beautiful child of yours a big hug for us. Okay. Thank you. Thank you very much. We appreciate it. Yes. You bet. You take care. Well, I mean, we're all in this together. That's what this is all about. It's children that I think are probably the driving issue for me. It's why I got involved with VACs, so I walked away from my television career. But I want to say this, that, you know, first of all, please take these opportunities.

We are not just a bunch of couch potatoes. I know out there the millions of you watching that just sit and watch the story. You go, oh, too bad. We can make a difference. It does make a difference if you reach out. Don't, you know, do it respectfully. Do it intelligently. Let's show them who we are and that we mean.

business in a scientific and intelligent way. And I also want to point out that for those of you that donate to ICANN, this is something we don't talk a lot about. There's many civil cases that we handle, but the privacy of those individuals exist while it's taking place. Luckily, Jen and Dane decided to share their story. But when you are supporting us, you allow us to take on stories and issues, legal cases, especially ones that we think will set precedent for many, many other families to come. It's really important the work that we do and you get to have a sense of just one of those beautiful families that we're working with and that Aaron Siri is working with. So thank you for your support. Well, speaking of Aaron Siri, we probably had one of the biggest

legal wins we've had in our experience in working with Syrian Glamstad with ICANN, Informed Consent Action Network. You know we've won against the National Institute of Health, CDC, FDA, Health and Human services. Well, we won in court against Washington, D.C. They had passed the consent, the minor consent for vaccination where 11-year-old children could consent to a vaccine without parental approval. This is what that law looked like in the news. In March, a new law went into effect in Washington, D.C. that allows kids 11 and up to get vaccinated without parental consent. Some children as young as 11. Child as young as 11 years old.

Children 11 years and older. Age 11 and over. The law actually requires the doctor, the school, the health insurance company, and the health department to all actively conceal from the parent that the child has received the vaccine. To protect their privacy, health care providers would have to build insurers directly and submit the vaccination record to the child's school. The legislation would potentially allow children to get a future coronavirus vaccine without their parents' consent. A child needs to be protected against the dangers of things like measles, other diseases that cause death, and the community needs to be protected so that diseases that were once thought to be eliminated are not coming back. I am 100% against that. I think it violates my fundamental right as a parent.

I think people across the country are hearing this and they actually can't believe it. Well, that law was codified in Washington, D.C. It went into effect and children were able to start vaccinating themselves without parental consent. Here it was D.C. Law 23-193 minor consent for vaccinations Amendment Act of 2020. Well, you might have seen that on any other of the networks you just watched in that sort of montage, Fox, MSNBC, and all of those just report on the news. This is maybe where we're a little bit different, and you're getting used to this, right? One of the things that we do when you are a recurring donor is that we make sure that we make a difference in this world, that we don't just report on it and whine about it.

We set out to make a difference. Well, right when this law was going into action, I had on our show, one of the great attorneys from Siri in Glimbstan, Elizabeth Brehm, joined me. And I called it out. I said, we are going to push back against this. Isn't this a lot of fun to be a part of a network, to be supporting someone where you get to say, you know what, we're going to do something about it?

This is me announcing that back in January of last year. December 23rd, D.C. passed a law allowing minors to consent to vaccinations, absent any parental consent or knowledge. So this new law allows children who are 11 years or older to consent to any vaccine. that the CDC recommends for their age. I mean, this is a horrific law. I know everybody that watches the high wire realizes that. So we're actually going to bring a case then against this.

This is just one of the ways that the informed consent action network does the work that we do. And I think we can honestly now say to win lawsuits when it comes to mandates that go against human rights. And in this case, are dramatically. opposition to parental rights. We're excited to see what you do with this case in D.C. Well, it's probably one of the biggest wins we've had, the biggest announcements we've been allowed to make when it comes to the legal cases that we've been a part of. Last week, we won this case in Washington, D.C. And by we, I mean none other than the man, the myth,

the legend, Aaron Siri, who joins me now. Aaron, first of all, congratulations, man. This is a really, really big win for I can. And I want to thank you for your incredible work. Thank you, Del. So let's get down to the nuts and bolts of this. I mean, these are scary laws. These are laws that I think prior to the work that we started doing, these things just went unchecked. Laws were being passed. People were losing, you know, rights to exempting out of vaccinations all over the country. How did we approach this? I mean, there's a lot of different ways to fight a case. you know, sometimes you're outside of the box. But what was the argument we made and why was that the argument that we used against this case?

So when we talked about addressing this law in D.C. That effectively let doctors, the school, insurance companies, and the health department all conspire to hide from the parents at a child that received a vaccine. We wanted to approach it in a way, as we discussed, that would not only, take away the law in D.C. that would permit that kind of really incredible conduct on the part of the government, but also have the same effect nationally. Because it's not just Washington, D.C. that's passing this kind of law. Other states are doing it. Other cities are doing it. They are permitting doctors to vaccinate children in D.C. as young as 11 without the parents having any knowledge of it and then in fact conspiring to hide it from the parents. And so the chosen, the path, the primary argument we made, ironically, is the 1986 Act requirement that a parent receive a vaccine information statement before a child is vaccinated. The 1986 Act is the National Child of Vaccine Injury Act. That was, as I'm sure most of your audience knows, it was adopted

by Congress in 1986 due to incredible liabilities that pharmaceutical companies are facing because of injuries from vaccines. And it gave those pharmaceutical companies effectively immunity. Well, it struck a balance. It said, okay, you the pharmaceutical companies no longer have to pay for injuries, essentially, but we need to have some kind of safety checks. And one of those that the parent had to receive a vaccine information statement before a child was vaccinated by the health care provider that was going to administer the vaccine

that provides some very critical information, including what the parents should advise the doctor about before. the child receives a vaccine because, you know, right, because the child may not, even according to CDC standards, may not be appropriate for the child. Right, might have had previous allergic reactions, lived in different states, had different, you know,

experiences with other doctors, or some other history in the family, all of that super important information to relay to a doctor prior to giving these products, something that 11 year old probably doesn't know their entire medical history. Right, most vaccines are given when children are young,

And so they wouldn't know if they've often had a prior action into what vaccines and what action was. You'd need a parent to convey that information. And so to answer your question, the chosen approach was to use a federal law and say, hey, federal law says the parent must get the VIS, the vaccine information saying before the child is vaccinated. Well, if federal law requires that, state law or local law can't conflict with that. It can't say, hey, doc, you can vaccinate this child without the parents knowing. Because if the parents are not getting a VIS. That means the parent is not receiving the required information that the 1986 Act provided for. Federal law, Trump's state law.

And that's basically was the core, the heart of the case that we brought. And we're very heart in that a federal judge and D.C. agreed and has enjoined D.C. from enforcing. that law on precisely that ground. It said that, you know, the 1986 Act provides at least this protection for parents. And so we, we use the 1986 Acts in this instance to protect parents' rights. I love this about your approach. It's one of the things when we first spoke and I decided to, you know, sort of work exclusively with you on the issues that I can was facing. But unlike many lawyers that I had spoken to, they're always like, oh, the 80s. Act just ruined everything. We can't sue the manufacturers. We can't do anything. You were the only

person that ever said, sure, the 86 Act has some serious flaws and it is messed up the system, but there are ways we could use it to our benefit. And I think it really shows, you know, a different perspective. It's something that we've done. I mean, I don't think anyone, most people want to get rid of the 86 Act. I do too, by the way. I think that this thing is an abomination. Having no liability on the industry has created the problem we have. while it's there to use it in our favor, there's something ironic and beautiful and powerful about that. And I think it's truly unique that that was the approach you took.

And when you say a federal law, that's a federal law, right? The 1986 Act is the federal law. And so a state cannot just over, you know, supersede that and say, well, we're going to break that law. And so, and because of that, then, it really sets precedent. We see these other states. We started looking up right before this show. Many, many states are, you know, in some way or another looking to try and have this child consent for vaccine law passed. Now we have precedent to really go after those states too and say, now it's already been decided.

You're breaking federal law. That is the hope. Obviously, we anticipate the appeal and we'll fight the appeal. and we will take this case in, as I can would like this to do in other places as well, to the extent that other states and other cities don't drop the laws that permit Dr. Sabakson without parental consult. And to your point about, you know. Well, let me just make the point.

You said, if I can't like, so I just want to say, I can like ye, likey, very much. We want to go after all those states, okay? So consider yourself signed up to be very busy. Well, hopefully, like you said, if, you know, we expect an appeal and when an appellate court rules on this, we hope that other states and counties and cities will fall in line as well. And you're exactly right. You know, sometimes my five-year-old gets a cupcake and he doesn't like, you know, anything other than the frosting. Well, let's just use the frosting if we don't, you know, if we don't like the rest of the cupcake. Yeah, exactly right. So, and just for people to understand, when you said that, you know, the doctors, the insurance companies, the schools are

conspiring against the parent. I mean, the law almost basically forces the doctor to lie to the parents, right? I mean, it even talks about the fact that the doctor has got to hide the fact that your child got this vaccine. The insurance company can't even show it in the building and the school in all of their records that the records have to have separate records. So they're literally like this body of people conspiring with your child against you as a person. And they're a parent. I mean, what that, it's just, to me, it's so shocking that anyone of any political affiliation whatsoever would think this is what we want in our nation, is our children working against their parents and giving them officials to do so? Yeah, I think one of the dangerous parts

of the act of this law in D.C. was that it basically teaches children that those that it normally with you as folks with authority, it's okay that not only did they, but the child along with them, effectively engage in line to their own parents. That's a very dangerous thing to teach a child, 11, 12, 13 year old. The doctor, according to the law, has to fill out the vaccine record without including that the shot was given. That then submitted to the school. The school then has a phony copy and a real copy. It has to hide the real copy from the parents. Then the insurance company is not allowed to send a statement of benefits to the parents' house, so the parents won't know about it.

And then the health department, which can find out the shots given, also doesn't tell the parent. So it really is a codified scheme to hide the fact that the vaccine was given to the parents. It's a very troubling way to approach law. But DC decided it wants to increase vaccine uptake, despite the fact that it has one of the highest vaccine uptake rates in the country for children. And so its chosen approach was, let's just cut parents out of the equation. That has a very dangerous precedent to set that the government can do that. It's amazing. I mean, we look at that in education, the conversations and educations where parents aren't

involved in the school process, that didn't work very well in Virginia when the governor made those statements. I think these politicians that think they're going to cut parents, you know, away from their children, and that's the way we're going to move forward in this country, are going to continue to be shocked at the reaffirms. results that we have. So amazing win, Aaron. And I know it goes beyond just having a great idea. You're writing. We get to read, you know, your cases. You're writing a spectacular in a courtroom. You're the best of the best. And we're so honored to have you working on our side.

So we're glad you're on my team and not their team. Let me just put it that way. All right. I'm another question for you. San Diego. We, again, another huge case. San Diego school district decided to bring a mandatory COVID vaccination for their students in San Diego. We said if California decides to mandate the COVID vaccine, we will go after them. We got on it immediately. We brought that case and we won. Judd Rules against San Diego's Unified COVID-19 student vaccine mandate. That was when we won back in December 20 of 2021. But just last week, I was seeing this headline. San Diego Unified approved COVID-19. COVID-19 vaccination mandate for 22 and 23 school year.

I literally texted you when I saw this and said, I thought we won this case. So what's going on here? So just to be clear, there is no COVID-19 vaccine mandate currently for the San Diego School District. Okay. That headline is that the school district is adopted one for next school year. So currently the case is on a piece.

And their hope, I'm sure, is that they're going to prevail on appeal. And if they do, that mandate then can go into effect. As it stands right now, it's a mandate that's not going to apply until next school year. So we'll see how the appeal plays out. Obviously, we hope we prevail and that the appellate court agrees with the trial judge that the school board did not have the authority to require this COVID-19 vaccine students. So we don't need another case. That original case will carry over. If we win the appeal, that's dead in the water. But right now, no parent in San Diego needs to run out and get their

child this COVID vaccine because of a mandate because that mandate doesn't exist until they win an appeal. So currently, they're safe and they're clear. Right. Currently, all parents still have their parental rights to make their own choice of what they want to do. Right. So this mandate doesn't, I mean, as the headline was clear that you just showed, it doesn't come into effect until the next school year. So there's plenty of time for the appeal to be decided between now and then. All right, cool. I want to get into just very quickly. I know your time is precious. We have a lot on your plate and I want to let you get back to it. But when we look at, you know, sort of the legal updates, by the way, folks out there, if you are not just on our mailing list right now, you would

been the first one to find out, just go to the highwire.com. All you do is put your email into our mailing list right now. Not only do you receive all of the evidence we provide on every week's show on Monday, you get all of the documents, all the peer reviewed science, but you're also the first one to get the legal updates when we win. So you would have been one of the first ones to know in the world that we won the DC case. You get the updates on what we're winning, what we're working on. So all of that is free for everyone signed up to our newsletter. Why you wouldn't be signed by that newsletter? I have no idea. But it's one of the favored emails that goes out, a huge engagement when we're sending out your legal updates. So let's talk about some of the

things that haven't been updated recently. I want to get into, since we're talking about children, I want to get into the FOIA request. Like these are the Freedom of Information Act request that we've submitted thousands of these things that you have. I mean, it's a lot of work. You have to write it out, put the whole request together, get it into our regulatory agencies. And for people that don't know what a Freedom of Information Act request is, essentially our government works for us.

They're our employees. So just like a boss can say, I want to look at all the emails that took place on my email server going out from our company under our company name. I'm allowed to see that. We're allowed to see that and those issues that are happening with our employees, which are our government. And so a FOIA request simply says, here's what we want to look at.

We want to look at emails involving Tony Fauci and, you know, Robert Redfield or whatever it is. Or we have questions about something that you've stated publicly or that's on your website. And one of the big questions we've had since they've been promoting this childhood vaccine, the childhood COVID vaccine, is how many children have actually died from COVID in the United States of America? And so we asked you to do that FOIA request. Take me through what that process has been, and have we gotten a response? Sure. So among the hundreds of FOIA requests that we send regularly to federal health agencies, one of them was we simply asked that the CDC provide, and I'll read the exact request.

So is that documents reflecting all conferred. cases of a child 11 years of age or younger dying of COVID-19. Simple request. Basically, hey, CDC, just give us the documents that you have showing all the confirmed cases of kids, 11 young, dying of COVID, right? Right. And the response was that the National Center for Health Statistics, that's the CDC's, you know, department where they gather all this data, has not conducted the analysis requested for this age group and therefore cannot provide you with a data product. So basically what the CDC is saying is we haven't done that analysis.

So we can't provide any documents. We don't have any documents that are responsive that reflect confirmed cases of kids, 11 young, or dying of COVID. Pretty surprising. So when Jen Saki or all of these spokespeople are saying increased risk of death and children, the vaccine reduces that,

they don't really have any base number that they're working with then on this. Is that what we're to understand? from that? All I can say is this. Freedom of Information Act is the federal, the official way that you would ask the federal government for information. That is the way Congress set it up so that we, the people who pay the government to do the work that they do supposedly for us to get information. And so when we send a request under FOIA, unlike a news reporter asking a question or just a random an email inquiry that go into federal agencies, they got to respond, right? They have a duty,

a legal duty to respond and respond accurately. And they also know that we'll challenge them in court if we have any concerns about their response. And so all I could say is that according to this response, they say they've never done the analysis to determine, confirm case to kids 11 and younger that have died from COVID. So yeah, when Jen Saki and all those folks are making these claims about children and children dying and the need for COVID vaccines, I don't know what analysis they're relying upon because we just asked for it and they apparently don't have one. Isn't it a bit shocking that we are two years into this?

I know I remember we've talked about Joe Biden stating I'm going to put $4 billion into stopping vaccine hesitancy, meaning I'm going to fund propaganda. I'm going to censor people. But when it comes to actually knowing what the risk is, our kids and whether they need this damn vaccine or not. You can't just throw a billion dollars at that. I mean, they didn't even throw a $20 bill at this. They did zero analysis of the hospitals across America. This is, this should be so shocking to anyone in the United States of America

right now. And frankly, anywhere in the world that looked up to the United States of America and our freedom and our transparency and our brilliant hospitals and doctors and medical systems. How is it? They're getting away with just sitting on their hands. Unfortunately, I wish we could say that this FOIA response is an aberration. But as you and I both know, and, you know, on the ICANN website, there's dozens of examples just like this of critical questions, critical statements that they make that we then ask for the underlying documents and the responses we don't have any. It's really surprising. And I think, I think it goes in part to the fact that there are dogma effectively akin to almost religious beliefs that permeate our health agencies.

They believe certain things. And it's almost like there's there's almost nobody at the wheel anymore because these beliefs then, you know, travel, gather steam. And then they all fall in line behind it. And nobody seems to ever ask anybody else, who's got the data? Who's got the analysis? I think they all just think somebody there has it. They must have it. I'm in line.

Someone's at the front of this line. Someone up there must have it. Amazing. All right. So let me ask you this. What was the date of that response that we got on asking about child deaths? So that was on March 10th, 2020. So that we got the response earlier this month.

I saw a headline and I think the timing is a little bit interesting. So on March 10th, they respond to us. This is March 18th, CDC slash COVID-19 deaths and children by 24% after correct. a coding logic error. We have some numbers here that they're putting up. In the footnotes and additional information section of the CDC's COVID data tracker, the U.S. Health Agency noted on March 15, 2022, data on death were adjusted after resolving a coding logic error. This resulted in decreased death counts across all demographic categories. Before the change, the CDC's COVID data tracker reported 1,75 all-time COVID-19 deaths for Americans under 18 years old. By Tuesday,

the all-time pediatric COVID death figure plummeted to 1,339, a decrease of 23.7%. There is so much that is wrong with this right now, Aaron. First of all, that this is coming out days after our request where they said they had no analysis. I don't know. Did we inspire them to finally do an analysis, I think, is a really good question. How much did we affect this? Which I know that we are having effect. But also, when we think about these numbers, 1,700, 1,300, I don't want to undermine, you know, what it means to lose a child. But there are 75 million children roughly under the age of 18 here in the United States of America, whether it's 1,700 or 1,300. That's a zero technically death rate. And with a decimal point in there before you get to a number.

So the amount of alarm and fear that's driving parents, I know parents that are terrified to go into public spaces around anyone that's not vaccinated. The kids aren't vaccinated or in schools. I mean, it's been driven to insanity. But 1,300 is now where they're at. They've obviously now done some analysis. Do you think that our challenge made this happen? Or did they just not want us to release the press release? They wanted to have it themselves.

So they held on to it for a couple of days. What's going on here? I mean, it's possible that after they sent the response on March 10th, they decided to take a look. Obviously, those numbers are not necessarily confirmed cases. What we ask for are the confirmed cases of death. So those numbers, as you said, they're a pretty small numerator to the denominator that would be all children. They're not saying those are even confirmed cases, but maybe in searching for that data, they came across there. It's possible.

Right. It's possible. you know, and that was for 18 years of age and younger. We asked for 11 and younger, which is very important because remember, they're licensing the vaccine by age groups. We asked for 11 and younger is one. And then we also ask for ages 12 to 15 because that's also different age ban that they're licensing the vaccine for. And even for that age group, 12 to 15, they said, we've never done that analysis.

How is it you've authorized the vaccine for ages 12 to 15, but never bar. to actually do an assessment of what are the number of confirmed cases of children that died from COVID that age ban? How did you do a proper risk-benefit analysis between vaccinating or the risk of COVID? Especially in the face of myocarditis, which you've admitted you know was happening. Like you would think we know kids are going to die from this vaccine, so we better know how many kids are dying from the virus so that we can make a proper analysis. I mean, just the fact that this is how our regulatory agencies in the United States of America are working, doing absolutely nothing. Just as you said, it's like a faith-based religion. Just give the vaccine,

who cares what the actual risk of the virus is. All right, there's a couple more foias I want to get through. So what else are we got in the upcoming legal update? Here's another one that I think is interesting because it might answer your question about, well, how do the, does the CDC get its information? Okay. And in this FOIA request, which you thought was really interesting, you have a Amanda Cohen, who's the lead of the vaccine planning unit at the CDC. And, you know, she wants to find out is aborted fetus cells using the development of the COVID-19 vaccine, right? Well, this is the CDC.

She's asking a whole slew of people in the CDC. You would think that they would know that already. Right. You would think that at the least that the FDA would know it. What do they do if you put the second page on? Yeah. They do it. They say parents should never do.

They go to Google. They search. they go to the internet and they go to a website that's run by CHOP, a private hospital, and a group of individuals there, the lead a doctor, who I believe is Dr. Paul Offit, who's made millions selling vaccines, and that's where they pull the information from. That's surprising in and of itself. It is.

It's not how you- Legal update on that. Yeah, it's not how you imagine that this works. The CDC is supposed to be the top. of the top dog here dictating everyone else. And when you ask them a question, I know, let's go to Google. Looks like Chop's got some information,

you know, a hospital outside of our system. Let's just go with that. I mean, crazy. Why would Chop have the information, the CDC, not have the information? Should the CDC and the FDA know what's in the vaccine that they're going to recommend? Do they have computers?

Maybe we have to introduce them to this concept of a computer. Hey, C.H.D. Here's what it is. This is a laptop. All you have to do, you can all get programmed in here and just at the touch of a button, just a query like a search on your own computer, it should pop up in your database. Amazing. Let's remember, too, they took billions of dollars of our money and they gave it to Pfizer-Modernan

these other companies to create, develop, and get these vaccines out there. But they don't even know what the ingredients are. Anyway. Amazing. You know, usually you look, I mean, I would say that when it comes to vaccine, that's not even looking at the hood. That's just looking at the paint. Right. Like, you don't even know the color of the car you're buying. You don't forget what's under the Right. Anyway, another FOIA response we got that there'll be in another upcoming legal update is during the Pfizer clinical trial, there's something called an independent data safety monitoring board. Yeah. And this is the board that all Americans and billions of people around the world are relying upon to assure that when that vaccine was going through clinical trials, the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine, there was a truly independent board that was overseeing safety. because that is what most Americans assume is happening.

That is what most people in the world assume is happening. Now, while the clinical trial is going on, the names of those folks is not disclosed because they're worried that people might pressure them and unduly influence them. Okay, fair enough, I guess. Well, once the vaccine is licensed, we're able to get their names,

and we have now obtained them through a FOIA request. And here they are. There are seven names. They were initially five, and somewhere along the way they asked, added to OBGYNs. Query why that is, that's for another day. But here's the part that's really, really concerning.

And it will also be in a forthcoming legal update is that when you look at these individuals, the conflicts that they have with pharmaceutical companies, and including Pfizer, prior to getting on this quote-unquote independent data safety monitoring board, are extraordinarily concerning. Can we get a taste? I mean, I know you love to have these updates and be a surprise.

We're going to give the sort of background of all those players. But how about just give you one of them? Sure. So Dr. Catherine Edwards, for example, who is one of the four authors on Plotkin's vaccine books. She's considered one of the world's leading vaccinologists. I guess Plotkin would be the godfather of vaccines and she'd be the godmother of vaccines. You've deposed. You've stood across from Catherine, too.

I mean, I don't know. Is that private information, but in some of these lawsuits, she's been brought in as a witness. So you've stood toe to toe with Catherine before. Yeah, that's not, it's public information. Yes, I have deposed Dr. Edwards and I've also cross-exammered her on the stand. And I can tell you that at least vis-a-vis this, you know, here she is.

She's sitting on the Pfizer independent data state department where she is the vaccinologist, probably the premier vaccinologist on this committee. Yeah. And literally directly before she got on this quote unquote independent Pfizer board, she was a paid advisor to Pfizer. So she went from being a paid advisor to Pfizer to Pfizer to supposedly like the skeptic that had challenged them. Right. To then being on the independent data city monitoring board. She's all I mean, I don't I can't think of a worse conflict.

She's also been an advisor, consultant, and received personal fees from Merck. She's had payments for giving lectures and been on the advisory board of GSK. And then to round out the big four vaccine manufacturers, she's also been a consultant and has been paid for lectures and has paid to take trips around the world by Sanofi. She's basically been a consultant advisor or an advisory board of every one of the four major vaccine manufacturers. She's also been a consultant advisor to numerous other pharma companies. I mean, just, you know, so basically, you know, the leader of team pharma there as far as going

out and speaking engagements and promoting these companies, we took a top level promoter advertiser for pharma and put her onto the safety commission that's supposed to be challenging the scientific method, really going out of these companies, going at this product, and really making sure that it's it's gotten through the the safety gauntlet properly i would say that if you were trying to find somebody more pro vaccine more that has more of those uh preconceived uh beliefs in vaccines that we were talking about earlier that dogma they couldn't have found probably they probably one of the best folks out there i would wow um who's got some pretty strongly held beliefs regarding vaccines.

And one has to question how impartial one can be when they hold those pre-existing notion. There are so many scientists out there. There are so many professors. Really, you couldn't find any that have never received money from Pfizer before. They didn't receive money from other pharmacy companies. This is the independent data safety monitor board.

And that's supposed to be reflective of somebody that's supposed to be independent. That's concerning. It doesn't stop with Dr. Edwards, as we'll provide a legal update, a number of these other individuals have been paid consultants for Pfizer before they got on this Pfizer independent data safety monitoring board. You can't make this stuff up. Again, if you want that list, you want to be the first one to be able to see

how entrenched these people are in pharma as they're supposed to be looking out for our best interest. Just be on our newsletter. There's so many free gifts on the newsletter. information you don't get anywhere else when it's breaking when it happens just take this opportunity to sign up it's super easy all right uh we got one more right well one more up thing all right let it let it you ask you to bring i did i did i love it responses that that are forthcoming legal updates that we haven't put out yet that we haven't sent over to you to guys yet to put out

yeah so here's i'll give you one last one and um you know this feeds into everything we've been talking about. On the CDC website, they have a section called facts about COVID-19 vaccines. Yeah. And here's a bunch of facts. I'll read them out real quick.

I'm looking right here. COVID-19 RNA vaccines cannot give someone the virus that causes COVID-19 or other viruses. They do not affect or interact with our DNA in any way. The mRNA and the spike protein don't last long in the body. It says MRNA never enters the nucleus of the cell where our DNA genetic material is located, so it cannot change or influence our genes, all of those types of issues. All right.

So what does this have to do with our legal update? We took four of those statements, the four main ones in there. We quoted them. We sent them to the CDC and we said, hey, please provide us the documents that you relied upon to make these statements, right? Yeah. And actually, quote, it says, all documents relied upon by the CDC to claim the following statements. And then we quote it, the exact words of the CDC. And what was their response? Well, hold on. Let me read it out so we know what we're asking for.

They do not affect or interact with our DNA in any way. All right, where's the proof of that? The genetic material delivered by the viral vector does not integrate into a person's DNA. Okay, sounds good. They do not affect or interact with our DNA in any way. And MRNA never enters the nucleus of the cell, which is where our DNA genetic material is kept. And then it says, a search of our records failed to reveal any documents pertaining to your request. They have zero documents referencing their facts.

I mean, it wasn't like theories that we're like moving with or, you know, hopes that we have. It's literally facts and nothing to back it up with. Like, doesn't a fact need some evidence? Proof, study, something? The CDC, and especially the CDC, which claims it's the science-based organization. They do everything based on the science and the data. you would think they would have at least some data, some study to support each of these statements.

The fact that they don't have any is concerning. And they know it's concerning. And the reason you know that is that when you read their entire response after saying, we don't, we can't find any records. I mean, they go on to say, we conducted a search of their records and found no records relating to request, you know, increases health security. Let me read it really quick. This is beautiful. Please note, CDC is a public health organization. CDC increases the health security of our nation.

CDC saves lives and protects people from health threats. To accomplish our mission, CDC conducts critical science and provides health information that protects our nation against expensive and dangerous health threats and responds when they arise. The sole agency responsible for the safety, efficacy, and security of human and veterinary drugs is the Food and Drug Administration.

I mean, this idea, like, we're the ones. We're on top of this except when we're not, like how you just got us now. But don't forget, just because we said we haven't done any of the science you just requested, remember, we're the ones that do the science that's protecting you. Yeah. Right. And look, they don't have to even do the science to support their statements.

They just need to have some science, some support for it. In fact that they state these things, they didn't say on their website, we think this is true, or here's the theory, or we believe this might be. They say, here are facts about it. and they have no support according to them after they reviewed their records for those statements. That's concerning. When the Surgeon General was saying they wanted to sort of, you know, get on to vaccine misinformation, I said start with your own regulatory agencies.

Where are the fact checkers, go fact check the CDC. These are not facts. Facts have evidence. They have proof. They have something you can reference. This is wishful thinking. This is dreaming. This is not science.

Aaron, you're all over them. I am sure they love you. I would guess that there's probably a big photo of yours hanging, you know, in the offices over there at the CDC and the FDA. Look out for this guy. Don't let him in the door. I think that photo might be next to yours, Dow. Okay. Well, at least we're somewhere together.

All right. Awesome. Aaron, so amazing. I want to thank you for taking the time. Not only all the work you're doing for us every single day. It's just truly off the charts. I think you are, you're going to make your place in history, and rightfully so. But I want to also thank you for taking the time to sort of carry us through some of these amazing developments this week.

Thank you. We love the work that we do for I can, and we appreciate that we can do it every day. All right. Sounds great. Take care. I'll talk to you soon. All right. Well, you know, when it's all about being amazing, we got to have those moments to celebrate. We have those moments to stand together. You should feel amazing right now. If you're one of those donors out there that has been helping us do this work, not only do we give you information that no other news network is, you are allowed to say, I made a difference. I stopped them from, you know, colluding with my child,

teaching my child to lie to me. Their teachers teaching them to lie to me. Their doctors teaching them to lie to me. You know, the insurance companies teaching them to lie to me, all by a bill, a government, teaching my child that I'm the enemy. You stop them. this week and you should feel good about it. And I think it's time we start celebrating these wins

because we have kicked some serious butt over this last year, year and a half. This pandemic is crashing down. There's more work ahead, but it's time to stand side by side together. You better book your tickets for this show. This is the example of what you get when you choose to attack all members of the human family.

This is what you get when you decide to go after a person's child. And I have to make it very clear that they really didn't expect all of this. Thousands from across the country rallied today in Washington, D.C. A rally against COVID-19 mandates. The message for many on Sunday was not anti-vaccines, but the right to choose. Thank all of you for coming out today to stand up for our children. Our grandchildren and our great-grandchildren.

The determination to preserve medical freedom is in. in your hands. We're fighting for ourselves, our patients, and all of you. We are fighting against big pharma. They have always put profits before patients. You know, here in the United States, really, it's going to be black people who really should get it first. So my African-American brothers and sisters,

the vaccine that you're going to take was developed by an African-American woman. As an African-American, I come here as one of the most vaccine-hesent group. If you choose to take the vaccine. vaccination do you take it? We should have a choice. The vaccine passports and the vaccine mandates take us back to the days of segregation. It's back to the state passports. Are you free or you're not free? You can't go here if you're not free or are you clean or you're clean or you're clean.

I'm tired of these people that sit in the White House that stimulate race wars. We're going to come together and we're going to fight these mandates together. Tired that we are being experimented on. We have all been deceived. I'm tired that we are being manipulated. They used our artists. They used our athletes, our singers, our rappers. Celebrities are under a tremendous amount of pressure

because they use celebrities to control of the black community. Shout out to we the people. Oh yeah, I forgot, they made that phrase, racist too. But as you see in the audience, those who are Muslims, Christians, those in the Jewish community, Democrats, Republicans, white, black, everyone all in between. This is the example that they do not want to see, but they have no choice.

This wall is so beautiful. Look at all of you. Look at you. The world sees us. We are 17,000 doctors. We are the last vegan of hope. We will not stop fighting for truth and for life. I believe in you. Are we ready reclaim the dream? Now the people rise up. Let's reclaim our country. The truth is like a lion. You don't have to defend it. Let it loose. It will defend itself. Well, we're two and a half weeks out for the biggest medical freedom celebration that's ever happened in the United States of America, and I hope we proved the biggest one in the world. I'm joined here to just sort of wrap up this incredible show in this moment with Mickey Willis. First of all, that's an amazing video.

You're bringing a whole other level to this rally with videos and experiences and promotions. And so why? What is it about this rally that's important to you? Well, you know, as you and I both experience in DC. This is one of the first times that I've ever been on stage with such a truly diverse group. You know, a lot of people didn't agree with each other's politics, but to stand there with the nation of Islam, Black Lives Matter, Hasidic Jewish leaders, top doctors in the world, vaccine injured, and people from all walks of life united for the cause that we all should be united for, which is our freedom and sovereignty. It was one of the most really inspiring experiences that I've had in years.

And so when you called me and said, we need to do this in L.A., I was all in. Yeah, I mean, obviously we're both. I always say that, you know, I'm an expatriate from, you know, L.A. You know, we're refugees. I had to leave a state I loved that I thought was beautiful in order to know that it was safe to do this work. I mean, I didn't want to get shut down, you know, all those things. The hospitals didn't seem safe to take your kids into.

But the idea of going back to the belly of the beast. I mean, I think one of the things about California, why I called the people that put the other DCS is, we've got to do that in LA, because this is where it starts. This is where Senator Richard Pan started this disease. SB 277, even before that, AB, I forget what the number was, where it was just we want to track you, we want to sort of give you the riot act. If you don't want a vaccine, we just want to read you a script. We'll never mandate vaccines.

Everyone said you are going to then SB 277. Well, we have to pass that law because we got to protect those immune suppressed children. said you don't care about the means suppressed children and then came you know 276 after that which was we're going after every doctor that is writing exemption for immune suppressed child and there they're trying to pass we've got eight i think there's eight different bills right now trying to be passed in california 10 i'm wrong 10 here they are the list of the 10 we won't go through all of them but the point being for those of us to think this is over this is the state that is trying to lead the charge this is the one that keeps causing the problems for america it's time to go back

and remind them how big this movement is and that we mean business. Yeah, that's right. It's a really great point you make, Dill, because there are some areas that they use as testing grounds. Yeah. That if they can get away with it there, then they broaden that out to other areas. Yeah.

And when you hear people like Fauci saying that there will be more lockdowns coming, I think there's a lot of people, I have a lot of friends and families still in Los Angeles area who are thinking, it's over now. Yeah. It's not over now. Right. And so it's incredibly critical that the people take this very seriously,

because if we can get ahead of this one, this time, we can save lives, save jobs, save all the horrible stuff that's happened because of some of the worst mandates globally that have all started and originated right there in Los Angeles, one of the most beautiful states in the world, really. And so it's very important for the people to realize this is a historic moment.

What we did in DC was historic. And this is now, it's coming to Los Angeles. And I know how tough it is to get people out these days. Yeah. But it is so critical that people show up to this event because the power in numbers, when they see large groups of people standing in solidarity for a unified cause, it makes a difference. We saw what the truckers were able to achieve.

Yeah. And these are the truckers on their feet right now. These are the people. We all have the ability to make a massive difference. And all you have to do is show up. That's right. Yeah, it's amazing. And the artist, the music that was there, I mean, that was part of what just blew my mind. I mean, the promoters that are behind this, we're working with them again. We're going even bigger this time. But I mean, 100-foot jumbotron, you know, a rock concert by Jimmy Levy. Other musicians are going to be there again. And to me, this is like, it's like Woodstock. I mean, everywhere I go, people are saying, one of the things I love about the high wire is, you know, I feel like I'm sane. I feel like I, you know, I get to recognize I'm not alone. we can end that loneliness when we all come together.

We're seeing communities coming together. We have a huge one here in Austin, Texas, which has been amazing. But that national community, it's huge. And it's time that we all met each other. It's the time that we come together. And I think with the elections coming up right now, like coming into this year, you know, not only is there going to be a shift politically. There has to be a shift in consciousness.

And part of that consciousness is, what is the biggest issue of our time? It's this pandemic. It's this vaccine that you tried to force this. This idea that somehow our bodies are still owned by the government. There's still people out there trying to pass laws, trying to use this to go in the wrong direction. We have the wind in our backs. But I think we put tens of thousands of people in the middle of Los Angeles where all the cameras of the world are station where the propaganda center is. I think you shift the election and those that we're looking at, Republican or Democrat, you better be answering questions of whether I have control of my own body.

and even more importantly, are my children mine, or are they proper in the United States of America? Yeah, that's true. And to use a sports metaphor, we literally have them on the ropes right now. Yeah. And in the world of boxing, that is not the time to stop. No. Because when you have the opponent on the ropes and they're tired and they're injured and they're about to go down, that's not when you walk away and give them a break. That's when you keep swinging. And so it's very important for us to realize that we have made incredible progress. And we have had, we have had, so many incredible victories that have happened this year. But this is the moment that we all step up together

and to let them know that we're not going to back down and that we're serious about this, serious enough to bring out the amazing people that are coming out. I mean, we have people from vastly different political spectrums. So we have Jimmy Dorr, we have Laura Logan, we have Naomi Wolf, we have rappers and singers and NBA players and people coming out. To with one message and that really is our body belongs to us. Yeah.

And we get to make the choices what we do with our body. And there are, we're there to celebrate that if you're vaccinated, you're welcome, you're loved. Yeah. If you're unvaccinated, you're welcome, you're loved. It's about personal choice and freedom, what this nation was built on. Yeah. And so that's why I'm really honored to be part of this, to be collaborating with you and with Matt Tune and Louisa and all the incredible people who have laid their lives and their jobs,

the reputations on the line to make this happen. It's going to be amazing. Real quickly, Plannedemic, are we expecting, is number three on the way? Pandemic three is on the way. We have a date. We have a new date. If anyone's heard me in any podcast or whatever,

talk about May 4th, not going to happen. This film has gotten so much bigger than we planned. We're really excited about that because it's coming out. It's really going to be quite amazing. But we are, we now have a drop dead date that I will announce right here for the first time any place, July 4th, Independence Day. July 4th, that's a good date.

You know, it just came out of... It has a ring to it. Yeah, it does, right? I like that. I think it's going to work. It is, you know, it's because it's ultimately really about our sovereignty and about coming back into a place of self-ownership and direction. And so we just thought that would be the most premium date to launch that film.

So, and it gave my producers and everyone involved a little bit of breath of relief because we were kind of up against a mammoth. of a film at this point because we're doing things that we've never done before that we'll talk about it at another date. Looking forward to it. Thanks. Hopefully we get a preview maybe even at the event. April 10th, defeat the mandates.

Look, folks, this is it. This is the one. It's time to show the world. They are looking to us. They're looking to us to be the beacon of light and hope to represent liberty and freedom. That is what this country stands for. We don't have to fight a war to prove that point. We don't need to lose our lives.

What we need to do is get in our cars, hop on airplanes, get in buses, and get ourselves into Los Angeles to show the world what we stand for, what this means, how important our children are to us. For those of us, they're out to thinking, well, I don't have to wear a mask. How many of your kids are still wearing masks in their schools? How close is that threat to go back to that?

The lockdowns, their lives. This is it. We, you know, as we said, we've got them on the robes. This is really, it's a celebration. It's also the moment to take this revolution to a whole other place. So defeat the mandates, April 10th. We're all going to be there. It's going to be special.

spectacular. We could use your help. Look, this thing is going to be big. I think we're even looking for a Ferris wheel right now to make sure the kids have something to play with. So if you have the ability right now, I want you to think about helping donate, go to defeat the Mandate's website, hit that they have a start of Give Send Go. We're really about $300,000 away from really nailing this thing to be the most epic production that will blow the world's minds. So if you can help out, just, you know, I know you look at a number like 300,000. So many of you are watching right now, $1 would make a difference. $5. Certainly you can contribute. There's a lot of different groups working with Pierre Corey and his group, FLCCC, is it 3C, something like that.

And he's been spectacular putting in ICANN is behind this. Children Health Defense, so many coming together. But we really need your help. This is it. It's going to be huge. Mickey, I know we've got amazing videos never before seeing going to be there. You know, big introductions. It's going to be off the train and I want to thank you for taking the time out of your movie making right now to join me today. Thank you, brother. All right, I'll see you in LA, April 10th. It's going to be a revolution. I'll see you there.