The Indicator from Planet Money - Nvidia chips for China, frozen Russian funds, and a lot of self-checkout stealing

Episode Date: December 12, 2025

It’s … Indicators of the Week! Our weekly look at some of the most fascinating economic numbers from the news. On today’s episode: Nvidia chips OK’d for China, a sticky frozen Russian asset situation, and a lot of you seem to be stealing from self-checkout. Related episodes: The tower of NVIDIA How to get Russia to pay Ukraine Why the U.S. cut China off from advanced chipsFor sponsor-free episodes of The Indicator from Planet Money, subscribe to Planet Money+ via Apple Podcasts or at plus.npr.org. Fact-checking by Sierra Juarez and Corey Bridges. Music by Drop Electric. Find us: TikTok, Instagram, Facebook, Newsletter.  See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for sponsorship and to manage your podcast sponsorship preferences.NPR Privacy Policy

NPR. This is the indicator from Planet Money. I'm Deryn Woods. I'm Waylon Wong. And blessing us with his presence today, Stephen Bessaha. Hey, happy to be here. Ooh. Steven.

I thought, was that presents or presents? Because I brought both. It is the holiday season. Thank you. Is it Secret Santa in the office today and I didn't get the memo? I am here with a bag full of indicators. Oh, because it's... Indicators.

On today's up the week. On today's show we have Nvidia chips being sent to China. Cash for Ukraine, maybe. And sticky fingers at the checkout aisle. That's all after the break. It is Indicators of the Week. Darian, you're up first.

What is your indicator? My indicator is 25%. That's the cut the U.S. government will get when Nvidia sells its H-200 chips to China. The Trump administration announced this week that it would allow Nvidia to sell these advanced semiconductor chips that are really useful in training AI. Okay, so advance, like, how good are these things?

Kind of the best of the B-list. I don't know if you guys have a favorite B-list celebrity. Hmm. I think I got to go Bruce Campbell on that one, right? I didn't even know who that is. Oh, interesting. That was very specific. I like that, Stephen.

I'll go with Bruce Campbell as well. The Spider-Man actor? Okay. Well, imagine these chips are the Bruce Campbell of AI chips. So, because they have a very big chin. So the real A-List lineup, You know, like the Cape Blanchets, those are the Blackwell chips. These H-200s that are being allowed to be exported to China, these are in the older Hopper series named after Grace Hopper, a U.S. Navy rear admiral who, fun fact, helped develop the programming language, Cobol.

She's a programming A-lister. Exactly. So these H-200s the chips China can get now, these aren't the most cutting edge. But, you know, I've still seen China Hawks here in the U.S. They are quite against this decision. They don't think China should be getting any AI chips from the U.S. Yeah, I've seen this likened to selling Soviet Russia's space equipment during the space race. One counterargument led by NVIDIA's CEO Jensen Huang is that by selling American chips to Chinese companies,

China will become dependent on American AI chips. Okay, so what's the counter argument to that kind of argument? Well, the counter argument to that counter argument is that the Chinese government is already spending immense amounts of money to make sure they don't end up reliant on the U.S. And in fact, even when the U.S. did allow NVIDIA to sell chips to China with fewer restrictions, China was still pulling out all the stops to develop its own advanced AI chips. And who knows?

We don't even know if Beijing will allow these H-200s to come in. And if they don't allow them in, then the U.S. government misses out on that 25% cut. Yeah. It is a bizarre situation all around. Well, you guys want to hear about another bizarre situation? Tell me. Okay. My indicator is $192 billion.

This is how much money the European Union is considering lending to Ukraine for its war effort against Russia. EU leaders are scheduled to decide on this next week. And we've been hearing about some very deep divisions recently. This is a long-simmering kind of arcane financial story that we've talked about on the show before. Yeah, this involves frozen Russian assets in Europe. Yes, and it is quite the sticky situation because you might remember that in 2022, when Russia invaded Ukraine, it got hit with sanctions from Western countries. So as a result, there's some estimated $300 billion in Russian assets that got frozen. And this includes investments like foreign government bonds.

And these investments have been sitting there generating cash. And then the financial institutions holding that cash have been investing it and generating even more cash. Yeah, but Russia can't get his hands. on any of that cash, right? No. And the EU has been puzzling over how to get this money to Ukraine without, you know, violating international law because it could be considered illegal confiscation just to take the cash and give it to Ukraine. So the EU is now proposing something called a reparations loan. And here's how it would work.

The EU would borrow money from the financial institutions holding this cash. It would then lend that money to Ukraine. And at some point in the future, if Russia pays war reparations, to Ukraine, then the money gets paid back. So Ukraine takes the reparations money and repays the EU and the EU repays the financial institutions. Yes. And then the EU is using reparations as a condition of lifting the sanctions. So when that happens, if that happens, the financial institutions can actually release this money back to Russia. Okay. So then what's the disagreement about?

The big sticking point, or one of the big sticking points, is a financial institution called Euroclear in Belgium. It holds most of the frozen assets. And the government of Belgium is super worried about Russian retaliation or that the country is going to end up being on the hook all by itself to pay Russia back. And then there's also this issue of Hungary, which doesn't want to give any more aid to Ukraine full stop. Okay, sounds like we'll know a lot more next week. Thanks for the preparation, Waylon. And speaking of security this time in the checkout aisle, Stephen. Yes, my indicator is 27%. That is the number of shoppers that heard this.

Welcome to self-checkout. And did not hear this. Is it because of an error on the self-checkout machine? Because that happens to me every time I use the self-checkout. Oh, innocent, innocent, Waylon Wong. No, this new survey that says 27% of shoppers admit they intentionally did not scan an item, also known as shoplifting. 27%, okay.

Yeah, it's a pretty big number. This is based on this new survey from Lending Tree. of about 2,000 U.S. consumers this year. And that 27% number is up from two years ago, like 12 percentage points up. Okay, so do we think this is financial hardship? You're like, oh, man, you know, groceries are bananas. I'm just going to take this one banana. Yeah, you were actually kind of right on board for the most part.

So, like, yeah, big motivation for people here, it is sticker price. Almost half of the shoppers who stole said they did it because they feel like essentials are unaffordable. and about the same number of blame price increases on tariffs. Though there's also this roughly third of the stealing shoppers who said they did it because self-checkout felt like unpaid work and taking something small felt like their rightful compensation. The endless ability to rationalize is quite impressive. That's some economic logic right there. That's really funny.

Right. They're justifying taking some more eggs because they did the manual labor of like pushing the cart around the store. They didn't have an employee do that. Life, it's really hard sometimes. It's so tough. Of course, you know, all this stealing is causing some big retailers to sour on this tech. I mean, last year, Dollar General removed self-checkout for more than 9,000 stores and blame shoplifting for that. Some Walmart locations also cut back last year, and Target put some restrictions like keeping it to 10 items or less in the self-checkout aisle.

They put in the self-checkout machines to save money, right? and labor, presumably. And they're losing it on theft, apparently. So now they have to go back to paying employees more or hiring more employees to staff up because they don't, I don't know. I don't know. I guess their bean counters are doing what they need to do. I don't know. Maybe you might get a few starting to come back.

I mean, all that said, though, soap checkout is still pretty popular. 55% of the shoppers in that lending tree survey, they said they like it because it is fast and convenient. And it allows you to steal more easily. Clearly. Now we're going to be in a situation where you have to call an employee. employee over to get one stick of deodorant out of the case and then you're going to have to stand in line and have a person beep it because they took away the self-checkout. Or they have to check your ID if you're buying alcohol or, you know, sometimes some machines

if you put your bag down, that'll be okay. Other times, if you try to put your bag down before you start scanning, the machine freaks out and thinks that you're doing something weird. I could stand here all day and talk about all my misadventures at the self-checkout, but that's extremely dull. so I will stop. All right. Thank you for checking yourself out, Waylon, and we will check you out.

Stephen, thank you for joining The Indicator. Thank you very much. Oh, my gosh. Beep, beep. This episode was produced by Angel Correides with engineering by Cine LaFredo. It was fact-checked by Corey Bridges and Sierra Juarez. Cake and Canon edits the show

and The Indicator is a production of NPR.