The Indicator from Planet Money - One Fed battle after another

Episode Date: January 13, 2026

Over the weekend, Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell said the Department of Justice served the Fed with grand jury subpoenas. Powell says it’s all a sham. But the stakes are unprecedented: A potential criminal indictment. Central bank independence. Today on the show, the administration’s case against the Fed. How did we get here? And what comes next?Related episodes: Lisa Cook and the fight for the FedTrump's unprecedented attack on the Fed  A primer on the Federal Reserve's independenceWhy Is The Fed So Boring?For sponsor-free episodes of The Indicator from Planet Money, subscribe to Planet Money+ via Apple Podcasts or at plus.npr.org. Fact-checking by Sierra Juarez. Music by Drop Electric. Find us: TikTok, Instagram, Facebook, Newsletter.See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for sponsorship and to manage your podcast sponsorship preferences.NPR Privacy Policy

NPR. As loyal indicator listeners almost certainly saw this weekend, Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell posted arguably the most viral front-to-camera video ever in Central Bank history. Powell revealed that the Fed had been threatened with criminal charges. These charges are ostensibly about renovations to Fed buildings. But Powell was crystal clear with what he believes this investigation is really about. The threat of criminal charges is a consequence of the Fed buildings. Federal Reserve setting interest rates based on our best assessment of what will serve the public,

rather than following the preferences of the president. This is the strongest we've ever heard Jerome Powell speak about President Trump's patterns of attacks on the Fed. He's paid to be boring and not spook the markets. And so, over the last year, Powell has been relatively restrained in public. You know, maybe he's a little annoyed, but he sticks to the matters at hand. I'd say terse. So to drop a weekend video calling out the administration's threats on Fed independence, this is huge.

And we're going to get into it. This is the indicator from Planet Money. I'm Waylon Wong. And I'm Darren Woods. Today on the show, what led to the administration's criminal investigation into Fed chair Jerome Powell? How strong is it? And what could come next? It's always worth reminding everybody that the Fed has two goals.

full employment and keeping inflation at 2%. In the main way, the Fed does this is through interest rates. Yeah, and high interest rates sting. This is the crux of President Trump's grievance with the Fed and Jerome Powell. Trump wants lower interest rates because he believes the economy would get a boost from cheaper borrowing. The Fed has lowered interest rates a little, but that might not continue. As we found out this morning, inflation is 2.7%. That's above the Fed's goal of 2%.

Trump has repeatedly criticized Powell for being too late on rate cuts. The president claimed on NBC News on Sunday night that he didn't know about the subpoenas at the Fed received, but that Powell, quote, is not very good at the Fed and is not very good at building buildings. By the way, this is not a metaphor. We are talking about literal buildings. Yeah, Powell implies that the subpoena is focused on some renovations. So let's go over some history.

In 2017, the Fed board approved the renovation. of two Fed buildings. These are along the National Mall, and the project was always going to be an expensive proposition for a few reasons. These buildings haven't had comprehensive renovation since they were first built in the 1930s. They have asbestos and lead, old plumbing, heating, and ventilation systems. And, of course, you've got historical consideration, so it's a huge job to modernize them. Costs have risen since.

In 2021, the cost was estimated at $1.9 billion. dollars. Now, the costs are estimated at around 2.5 billion, a 32% increase. The Fed attributed these to general inflation, more asbestos being discovered, and design changes after consulting with others. Regardless, these cost increases, plus some of the language used to describe the renovations, caught the eye of some Republican lawmakers. Rooftop garden terraces. Like Republican Senator Tim Scott at Powell's regular update to Senate Banking Committee mid-last year. We found the ornate water features and final plans.

The new elevators that drop board members off at the VIP dining suite was page 37 of the final plans. The white marble was pages 40, 41, 65 of the final plans. Powell hit back. Can I just quickly say some of those are just flatly misleading. The idea of elevators, you know, it's the same elevator. It's been there since the building was built. So that's a mischaracterization.

And some of those are no longer in the plans. Several weeks later, Trump seemed to cool down on the whole debacle after visiting the construction site with Jerome Powell. Ah, yes, I remember that interaction well. They had a little hard hat photo op. And then it got kind of derailed with this back and forth over the price tag. So the 2.7 is now 3.1. I'm not aware of that.

Yeah, it just came out. Yeah, I haven't heard that from anybody. It's bad. Straight out of the office. Yeah, so as Powell implies, like with the elevators, the details are not as scandalous when you dig into them. That so-called rooftop garden terrace is actually at ground level. It's just a garden on top of an underground parking lot. The new water features have been removed from the plan, and the marble is restoring the original marble.

Now, nobody loves cost-over runs, and project managers can do better at preventing them. But spending more than you originally planned on large projects is incredibly common. For a past episode, I spoke to Danish researcher Ben Floubaier. He looked at 16,000 large projects worldwide, and he found that 92% of them went over budget, overshedule, or both. So garden variety cost overruns are not criminal, but was Powell's testimony last year? Did he knowingly make a false statement to Congress? We don't have the exact subpoena from the Department of Justice, but based on what Powell has said,

seems to be implying that Powell lied to the Senate Banking Committee last year about the renovations. So you could squint and find discrepancies. Like when Powell said, there's no roof garden terraces. Was that true if they're on top of an underground parking lot? Yeah, but all of this is just really splitting hairs. The reality is that the Fed's website backs up the substance of what Powell said in testimony. One of the key parts of perjury is what's called materiality. If Powell knowingly misled Congress, would that have had a material impact on how lawmakers made their decisions?

Like, would Congress have done anything differently if they had better information about the greenery on top of the underground parking lot? Powell says we need to look at the bigger picture here. Trump has made it clear that he wants the Fed Chair to do his bidding on interest rates. He started his attacks on Powell during his first term. and things have escalated during this administration. Remember, Trump tried to fire Fed official Lisa Cook. She sued the administration, and the Supreme Court is expected to hear that case soon. Now, the Fed seems to have been defending itself.

In December, it reappointed a slate of regional Fed presidents extending their terms. This has the effect of reducing the impact Trump or Trump appointees can have on who leads the different Fed banks. This is important because these Fed presidents take turns on voting on interest rates. University of Michigan economist Justin Wolfers wrote on social media, if I'm reading this properly, they just Trump-proofed the Fed. And this math around who votes when gives us a clue as to why these attacks on Jerome Powell are happening now. Like Powell is very close to ending his term as Fed chair in May. The thing is, he can go back to his old voting role as a regular Fed governor sticking around, voting how he likes until 2008. That's not something Trump. That's not something

Trump would be happy about. Yeah. And if I were the new Fed chair coming in, this would certainly make me a little bit nervous about defying the president. We've talked a lot on the show about how important central bank independence is. It's a pretty clear correlation internationally that the more politicians meddle, the higher inflation goes. This could explain why various Republican lawmakers have opposed the subpoenas targeting Powell. Some, like Senators Tillis and Murkowski, have even issued statements criticizing the move.

So far, the market reaction has been fairly muted. This is a notable, but not necessarily unsurprising chapter in what's been simmering the last year, the politicization of the Fed. In years past, no one's been particularly interested in what party appointed which Fed governor. Now, the Trump administration seems to be doing everything it can to make a body filled with loyalists, including what appears to be fairly weak legal action against the Chair.

This episode was produced by Corey Bridges with engineering by Quasi Lee. It was fact-checked by Sierra Juarez. Kate Cancannon edits the show and The Indicator is a production of NPR.