The Indicator from Planet Money - Why is the federal government still killing coyotes?

Episode Date: March 17, 2025

The federal government spends millions of dollars each year on wildlife damage management, a program that includes killing thousands of coyotes. Yet this program may actually have the opposite effect on the coyote's population. Today on the show, why the government keeps spending money on a problem it can't fix. Related episodes: Shooting Bambi to save Mother Nature For sponsor-free episodes of The Indicator from Planet Money, subscribe to Planet Money+ via Apple Podcasts or at plus.npr.org. Fact-checking by Sierra Juarez. Music by Drop Electric. Find us: TikTok, Instagram, Facebook, Newsletter. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for sponsorship and to manage your podcast sponsorship preferences.NPR Privacy Policy

NPR. This is the indicator from Planet Money. I'm Daryan Woods, and I'm here with Kate Dario, producer for the public radio podcast Outside In. Hey, Kate. Hey, Daryan. It is great to have you. You've been reporting on one wildlife program that has been quite controversial over the years. Yes, the U.S. Department of Agriculture oversees a budget of millions for what it calls wildlife damage management.

Is that some kind of euphemism? Well, some environmental groups would say so. Part of this program includes the killing of coyotes every year. They do this with rifles, cyanite, and even aerial gunning. It's tough to say exactly how much is spent killing coyotes. The agency doesn't readily release those numbers. But news outlets and nonprofits have estimated that it costs anywhere from $200 to $600 per coyote. Doing some back-of-the-envelope math, being conservative.

That means it costs taxpayers close to $17 million to kill coyotes every year. Yeah, but here's the thing. That program may actually be increasing the number of coyotes overall. So today on the indicator, why is the government spending millions of dollars on a program that is exacerbating a perceived problem? And could that money be better spent? So it is important to note that coyotes are indigenous to North America. They emerged as a distinct species in the American Southwest and Great Plains about a million years ago. And along the way, they have developed a batch of traits. that have made them super scrappy.

You'll often hear people say something along the lines of when the world ends, all that will be left is roaches, rats, and coyotes. Christine Wilkinson is a carnivore ecologist based in the Bay Area in California. She says she feels empathy for these misunderstood creatures. I can more easily relate, not just to my study animals who face all sorts of issues,

but also to the different communities and types of people that I work with. Christine says, unlike wolves and other predators, coyotes have a big evolutionary advantage. They're not picky. Coyotes are generalists. They're very flexible in their diets. They're omnivorous. They're also behaviorally and socially flexible. They can hunt either at night or during the day, which makes it easier for them to adapt to diverse environments. And they have some unique reproductive tricks that make trying to kill them off, likely to bite you in the butt, as Christine puts it.

First, there's evidence coyotes will demonstrate what is termed compensatory reproduction when under attack. What that means is their litter sizes will increase to make up for the coyotes being killed off, and you'll see younger coyotes breeding earlier. We call this offsetting behavior in economics, and that basically means when somebody changes their behavior in response to a policy meant to limit risk, like riding your bike more dangerously than you normally would when you're wearing a helmet. For coyotes, that means breeding more when they're being hunted. And I'll throw in some Latin here, too. Coyotes know something ancient classical philosophers knew well. Ordu vacui, excuse my pronunciation.

I would have no idea. Well, it means roughly nature abhors a vacuum. If sort of a niche opens up where that breeding pair has been killed off, then another breeding pair can emerge really easily, or new coyotes can move into the area very easily. So normally within just a few years, you'll have the same number of coyotes in your backyard, or maybe even more. Plus, there's evidence that coyotes become more aggressive after an extermination event, leading to more conflict, which can be fueled by coyotes trying to feed their now larger litters. All of this means the westward expansion in the 19th and 20th centuries actually helped coyotes expand their territory. Farmers and ranchers brought livestock like cows, chickens, sheep, and pigs. Easy snacks for predators. And ranchers were soon

concerned about their animals being attacked. At first, wolves were seen as the primary culprit. but then coyotes. This is when you see the origins of today's wildlife services program. Its predecessor was called the U.S. Biological Survey, and its primary goal was science, cataloging the country's wildlife. But historically, Congress was sometimes skeptical about funding pure scientific research. So the little agency pivoted. So the biological survey, primarily to get regular funding, advocates that it's the solution

to the so-called predator problem in America. That's Dan Flores, an environmental historian and author of the book Coyote America. He says the biological survey was really good at killing wolves. Between about 1910 and 1925, the biological survey essentially wipes out wolves in North America. And so the biological survey realizes, okay, we've got to have another animal that we can promote as a real threat to America, and that's when they come up with the idea that the coyote is the arch-preditor of the 20th century. That pitch worked, and nearly $10 million was allotted in the 1930s

to eradicate coyotes and other species. Poison or traps are the more usual way of killing coyotes. There's one now. But we now know, because of compensatory reproduction and Orovaqui, This didn't work. And there's a third biological trade at play here. Coyotes are considered a fission fusion species. They can work together, i.e. fuse, when it benefits them all.

Or separate, that's the fission part, when environmental conditions make that more advantageous. In other words, they can be solitary or social, depending on whichever behavior benefits them at a given time. All of these factors explain how coyotes ended up just about everywhere in the lower 48. Intriguingly enough, our attempts in the American West, which was the coyote's original range, to try to control their populations resulted in spreading them across the continent as they went into fish and mode. So instead of exterminating coyotes, the federal government has helped triple their range over the past 150 years. They can now be found in just about every corner of this country, from the plains of Montana to the suburbs of Atlanta to even downtown Manhattan. Yeah, I've seen on social media posts of coyotes in Central Park. I was pretty surprised.

They're very cosmopolitan. They seem to be. And, you know, they've been reported grabbing small pets and even on the rare occasions nipping people. Wildlife Services, plus other state and local agencies, still see killing coyotes as a solution, primarily to protect livestock. Reports of them grabbing small pets and nipping people, those are really, really low. But people are nervous sometimes. And this is a debate that runs very deep for many, especially in the American sheep. sheep industry, which has been in decline for decades.

USDA data reported more than 100,000 sheep and lambs killed in 2019 by coyotes. Still, research has undermined the idea that lethal management makes sheep safer. There are studies demonstrating that non-lethal management techniques, like fencing and guard dogs, are more effective at reducing predation than just killing a bunch of coyotes. Plus, the 2006 paper found that coyotes weren't the reason for the sheep industry's shrinking size. This paper found increasing production costs and decreasing lamb prices played a bigger role. Christine Wilkinson's solution? We learn to live with coyotes. We need to just accept the fact that there are coyotes and they will continue to persist.

And there are numbers that indicate we may be on the road to doing this. Non-lethal management practices have grown in popularity in recent years. The number of operations using non-lethal methods to protect their flocks increased by more than 100. 40% from 2004 to 2019. And Wildlife Services started receiving congressional funding to research non-lethal methods in 2020. That said, there are a lot of changes taking place at federal agencies under the Trump administration. And answers are not easy to get. We reached out to the USDA to ask about its current budget for this program and whether they think coyote

Kulling is still a wise use of taxpayer dollars. They did not respond to our emails or a couriered letter. This episode was produced and fact-checked by Julia Ritchie and Sierra Juarez, who's engineered by James Willits. Kate Kin Canaan edits the show and The Indicator is a production of NPR.