The Joe Rogan Experience - #2289 - Darryl Cooper

Episode Date: March 13, 2025

Darryl Cooper is the host of the "Martyr Made" podcast. www.martyrmade.com Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

The Joe Rogan Experience. The guys today I think are the highest level fighters of all time. We run? Hey Darrell, what's going on man? How's it going? We were just talking UFC. Yeah. I think this is the, we were talking about how exciting the Ankolyev and Pereira fight was even though people didn't they didn't like it

because it wasn't like some crazy result a giant knockout like you get in most Pereira fights but it was so technical and Ankolyev just did a fantastic job of shutting down the scariest guy in the division. Yeah, I just and the psychological aspect of it of just he made him back up and second-guess himself Yeah, and you know, that's you can't just do that by being aggressive You can't you know, you really got to get in there and you got to hurt him a little bit You just have to put that on him and it was it was amazing to watch I thought it was a great fight. Well, it was so interesting because the consequences of

Exchanging with prayer are so high but also uncle Ankaliyev. Ankaliyev's knocked a lot of people out. We always look at Pereira's knockouts, but Ankaliyev's knocked out some of the best guys in the division, and he only lost one time. And that was, Paul Craig has the nastiest fucking triangle. It's so sneaky and so quick, and you don't expect it. He's so high level off his back, and he caught him, I think, with like one second to go in the third round, a fight that he was losing. Yeah, he broke Jamal's arm or dislocated his elbow, too. He's one of those guys, like Ryan Hall.

They're on the feet dancing around. It's like, what are we really watching here, kind of, but man, as soon as they hit the ground, it's the next level. Yeah, there's a giant disparity between his stand up, which is good. His good stand up. You know, and the Bo Nicol fight was entirely stand up. It was a good fight. You know, he looked good on the feet, but you would never say, you know,

this is like an Israel Adesanya type character. He doesn't have that level of proficiency with striking, but God, when he gets on his back, you're in such danger. Like nobody else in the division. It's weird, because most guys when he gets on his back you're in such danger like nobody else in the division it's weird because most guys you're on their back you're not really worried about it with Paul Craig it's like everything has to be tight especially guys that size you don't see it as often no you don't especially in an era when you know the off your back jiu-jitsu is kind of i don't want to say like you know they figured out the game on that yet but you know it's not quite to that level you still have your craigs and Oliveras people like that who really are dangerous off their back

But it's it's not as common anymore, you know Well, it's really hard to do and also most people don't want to be on their back So they don't even practice off their back and the common thought amongst coaches is when you're on your back There's two minutes to go. You're probably not gonna pull a submission off you got a constant getting back up to your feet minimizing whatever scoring your opponent is done by taking you down and whatever shots they've landed mitigate those as much as possible and get to the feet as quickly as possible yeah that's what everybody's trying to do now especially in a three-round fight I mean it's like

yeah you let yourself get laid on for three minutes in the first round nothing really happens but you lost that round You better win the second one. Well look at like the arm and Sarukian Fight if if you if you think about that fight with Charles Olivera Charles Olivera caught him multiple times in like deep submissions, which I think should count for a lot Which I thought if I looked at who won that fight, I would say Oliveira won that fight. Oliveira had him in deep trouble. It was kind of a controversial opinion but I think a tightly locked triangle or a Darce choke or anything along those lines

should be considered winning. You're doing something very difficult to do. Your opponent doesn't want it to happen. You've dominated a position to the point where you're you secured a submission And then this guy sneaks out with sweat and technique and fucking grit. Yeah, but he was in fucking trouble Oh deep deep trouble. At the very end especially. Yeah. Oh definitely I'm a little biased on this one because I'm an adopted member of the Armenian community, but Yeah, but but it was a great fight. I'm a giant fan of Armenians Oh, you know what I love about them? So many great fighters in the UFC, all the way back to Carl Parisian, been Armenian,

but I like the style of the people. Yeah, exactly. The thing I love about them is Armenians love being Armenian. Yes, they do. It's just great to be around. They're very proud of it. I love it. Yeah, very friendly people too.

So this podcast, like there's podcasts, I never say who's coming on the podcast. I just like put it out there. Everybody knew that Trump was coming on and there's been a couple of times when people knew that I was interviewing people. For the most part, I just like to do it, have the conversation and then put it out. But you put it on Twitter that you were coming on and then the campaign began. I put it on my sub stack behind the paywall. But apparently some of my enemies, you know, pay me five bucks a month to follow my sub stack. I saw what happened with you on the Tucker Carlson thing and I spoke about it almost

immediately on the podcast. Whenever I felt like it came came up I don't remember how many days afterwards but I've been listening to podcasts for a long time and it's it's so charitable and comprehensive and so thorough and so you put so much weight on the real lives and suffering of human beings on all sides of any conflict. The regular people that didn't want to be dragged into any war, that find themselves on the front line. The stories that you tell and the way you tell them is so comprehensive and so, again, charitable. Like, the humanity of these people is so well expressed that your fans know you. I'm a fan. I know

you. I know how you view things. I know how you portray things. I know how honest you are about all aspects of conflict and again, as charitable as possible the way you lay this out. So when I saw these attacks on you and when people were calling you an anti-Semite and a Nazi apologist, I was like, good lord, this is not gonna work on people who know him. You know, I've been through that wringer before, I know what that is, but with you I was like, all anyone needs to do, and I encourage you, if you're like, I can't believe you have this guy on, listen to fear and loathing in the New Jerusalem. Listen to it.

Just so you don't even have to listen to the whole thing. Listen to the first hour of it, and there's no fucking way the person who made that is anti-Semitic in any way, shape or form. And that's just one of the things that you've done that show that. The problem is when someone says something and they're trying to be hyperbolic or they're trying to get a reaction or you're shit talking or you post a meme online or something like that, this bizarre culture we live in that wants to reduce people to the worst possible interpretations of what they said or who they are, and to ignore everything else but for one small tweet or one statement

made in, you know, trying to be, trying to get a reaction, trying to be outrageous. Like, it's a stupid thing that we do. And as someone who values your show and listens to your show all the time, it's not just stupid, it's bizarre how many people fall for this kind of stupidity. And I know how this whole thing works I guarantee you probably gained a bunch of fans and you probably gained a bunch of people who listened because

Most of the time when someone gets discredited in the media or someone gets shamed a Lot of people will immediately hop on board, but a lot of other people will go well What is this guy saying? What is this about? What's their content like? If they listen to your show, they will realize it's one of the very best long-form history podcasts that's available online. It's fantastic. It's really good. So it's so unfortunate that there is these attack vectors that they could use

to try to change perception of who you are. But the fortunate aspect is there's so much of your work out there that anyone could just comb through. And you're not hearing that side of it from any of these people, any of these detractors. No one's saying, you know, listen, I listened to some of his stuff and, you know, maybe he shouldn't have said what he said about Winston Churchill, but I think he was just being hyperbolic. And if you just listen to actually what he says about the whole conflict, you kind of get an understanding of who this guy is. And so there was a lot of resistance to having you on, but I was like, fuck that resistance.

I know what you actually do. And so that's why we're here. Well, thank you. I appreciate that. Yeah, you know, I mean, the Tucker interview was, I could have been clearer in what I was saying. I'm not going to like, absolve myself. Let's explain what you said, because you were talking about what you say to Jaco, right?

Yeah, that's how it originally came up, because Jocko's wife's English, right? So Churchill's like a sacred figure in their pantheon. And so I said that, you know, maybe I'm being a little provocative here. I like to provoke Jocko with my Churchill takes or whatever, but that's only part of it. I mean, I'm very critical of Churchill's role, in my opinion, in turning the German invasion of Poland into the Second World War basically, you know, that, you know, it's as I get older, you know, I posted something on X today that somebody had posted a video, a drone is going toward a Ukrainian or a Russian truck or something

and it hits it and it doesn't blow up and, and it hits it, and it doesn't blow up. And it's like boom, boom, and it translates. It doesn't blow up. It doesn't blow up. And as I was watching that thing, when it didn't blow up and the video ended, I felt like this really strong sense of relief that it didn't blow up.

And I reposted it, and I said, I think as I get older, I just don't have the stomach for this kind of stuff anymore. And I see something like that. And like, I don't care who's in the truck. I don't care if it's Russians. I don't care if it's North Koreans or you. Human beings. I just like, I'm just glad that they're okay.

Like, that's what I actually felt at the time, you know? And as I get older, like, that's just how I feel more and more about these things. Like whether any any conflict is like, it's not this's not like a young man's thought, I guess, but like I'm just, I'm happy when they're over and they need, I mean, the damage that they do to people and not only to the people who are in it fighting, but that it does to the societies and cultures that are involved in these things. It does real damage to our spirit, you know? cultures that are involved in these things, it does real damage to our spirit. You should go back to 04 when the Abu Ghraib expose came out. Americans were horrified by that, and rightly so. They saw those pictures. But the thing that was interesting is that they were

horrified partly because, like, look how awful this is that they're doing to these people or something. But for all they knew're doing to these people or something. But you know, for all they knew, they knew these people were in prison, they might have thought they were terrorists or something. What people were really like feeling at the time was, what are we doing to our people? Like, what is, you know, what are we putting them through that our people are being reduced to this? And, you know, kind of the sad thing now is like, I don't know if we would have the same reaction today. I think the war on terror has sort of desensitized us

too a lot and hardened our hearts in ways that are not good for us. And so when I do my podcasts, whether I'm talking about the Israelis and Palestinians, I did a long one on Jonestown, seven episodes, like 35 hours long. And whoever it is, like my rule is that I don't record anything until I feel like I can put myself in the shoes of the people that I'm going to talk about and really

kind of understand how their actions made sense to them with the information they had in the context of their time, you know what I mean? And so when you do something like that with the Mealy massacre, for example, I did that with that story, the Jonestown one. I mean, Jonestown, you're talking about like this raving lunatic who took a bunch of people out into the jungle and they all committed suicide. So putting your... It's very tempting and very easy to just write off any responsibility to understand what was happening there because

you're like, well, we know what was happening. These people were nuts, you know? But the thing is, like, if you really think about the consequences of taking the wrong lessons from things like that, you know, the response that we... That the federal government had to the Waco standoff in the early 90s was very much informed by the way people thought about Jonestown, which is that, you know, we let this go on too long. The problem wasn't that, you know, that maybe we had this paranoid group of radicals out here that, you know, maybe we shouldn't have done so much to feed into that paranoia. We needed to ease these people out of it and try to deescalate.

Instead we should have, we could have prevented it if only we'd have gone in hard right at the beginning and taken this guy out. And so then you get wake-o, you know? And so there are real-world consequences to taking the wrong lessons from these things and really just kind of forgetting that it doesn't... I mean, look, you may have like your Jeffrey Dahmers or something out there that are an exception to this rule, but they are the exception that proves the rule. It doesn't matter who you're talking about. You could be talking about Uday Hussein, Saddam's son, just a sadistic monster of a human being. But that kid was

a three-year-old at one point, or that guy was a three-year-old kid at one point who did not, like, it's not like he was waiting in line in the spirit world before he was born, and they're like, who wants to be Saddam Hussein's son? And he's like, I do, I do. That's the world he was thrust into, you know? And you see a guy like that, and then you, you know, you're horrified by the things that he does. But then you say, look, man, you know, if the stories are true, at least, least like Saddam Hussein used to take him and his brother when he was six years old to go watch torture sessions and executions because he needed to harden them for, you know, ruling the country

one day. And it's like, I don't want to pretend like I have the remotest idea of, you know, how a kid is supposed to respond to watching torture sessions when he's six years old and coming up in that world. Like, what do I know about that? You know what I mean? And so I, like, I try to stay humble as I'm reading about these people, not assume that I'm better than them or different than them, and really just try to understand them on human terms, you know? And again, that doesn't... When I did that in the Tucker interview with regard to the Germans in the I did that in the Tucker interview with regard to the Germans and the Second World War and the series that I'm working on right

now, which is the Second World War from the perspective of the Germans, you know, it's people who... It's not just people who are purposely misinterpreting things or anything. You know, a lot of people who are in good faith, they see something like that and they think you're trying to justify or rationalize what happened, you know, because there is this thing where, I mean, the Jonestown story, this really did kind of happen to me, where, you know, when you get past a certain threshold of understanding people, you're butting right up against empathizing with them. I mean, that's like the next step. You gotta take one more step and you're empathizing with those people. And so people see that and you're empathizing with evil people, whoever it is. But I really believe that it's really

good for us individually and as a society too. I think it has a positive effect on us to like, when we force ourselves to understand, you know, people we don't like as human beings and just understand that their motivations are really no different than ours. Well, this is one of the reasons why your podcast is so important because you talk about things in this way. And this is one of the reasons why I knew you were Misconstrued or you would be misconstrued if something like that came up That's doing that is fine with Jonestown, you know with Jonestown everybody's like well

How could these people have convinced these people to drink the Kool-Aid? Why would the people do it? What kind of a monster turns into this genocidal maniac and brings people to the jungle and does this? But when you do it with any other subject, you can kind of get away with that until it gets to Nazis, until it gets to World War II. And then people have these red flags that pop up that just completely block out any objectivity. They remove all nuance. You lose all objectivity. You just anything you're saying. Imagine being a young man drafted into Hitler's army at 17 years old and not knowing what you're doing and then becoming this monster That's a Nazi apologist, right? This is we've we've had this reductionist perspective on

Anything that has to do with that horrific moment in history that if you even attempt to Do this very comprehensive process that you do with all other subjects, where you look at the human angle. You look at these people, the conflict, how did this get started? It's not there's good people on one side and there's evil people on the other side. No, there's genuinely just human beings. And there's horrible circumstances, and then there's evil people who lead these people in horrible circumstances to do evil terrible things and People are tribal and they can buy into all kinds of crazy ideas and go forth and do horrific Atrocities and believe that God is on their side

This is a part of being a human being that has existed fucking forever But in our culture in our media environment where everybody is rightly so, so terrified of anti-semitism, because there's real anti-semitism out there. And real anti-semitism is horrible, just like real racism is horrible. The problem with calling everything racist and everything anti-semitic when it's clearly not, is that you diminish what that word means. You're essentially crying wolf. You're doing it in ways where rational, logical people who know your work have a very good argument against it.

This doesn't make any sense in the context of which it was said. If you look at the body of his work, if you look at how he talks about things, this is how he approaches stuff. This whole being provocative is part of what you do. It's part of what makes the audio come to life in these podcasts when you're talking about these moments in

history. This subject is just so sore with people, and particularly right now after October 7th, where I remember all of a sudden going on X and seeing anti-Semitism just like right out in the open, blaming Jews for everything, going, whoa, like has this been hiding? And then you start thinking the way your paranoid Jewish friends think, that everybody's anti-Semitic, and you go, well, now I kind of understand why they think that way. So I kind of understand the overreaction, but it is still an overreaction. And I think what you do is very valuable. It's very valuable to me and it's very valuable to human beings that want to hear this nuanced, comprehensive perspective on these conflicts. And from a person who obviously cares deeply about them

and cares deeply about the human cost of these. One of the things you do so well, and I was just talking to Dave Smith about this yesterday, the gravity of war, the toll it takes on the people that are engaged in and the people that are just outside of it and what is left of their civilization. It's fucking horrific. And it should be avoided at all costs. But we don't, you don't avoid it by exaggerating. You don't avoid it by distorting someone's perspective and turning everybody into a monster so that

everyone's scared to talk at all. Because this is the main objective. Most overreactions like that that are public and hyper aggressive and constant and continuous, it's not just you. It's to stop anybody from ever doing anything like that in the future to let them know there's consequences. There's going to be financial consequences, there's going to be your status online, your whatever you're, you know, however you're viewed by people will be now marred forever with this ugly stain of being not just an anti-Semite, but a Nazi apologist.

That's what I read. Nazi apologist. Like, you can't say that Unless you listen to his stuff you can't unless they listen to your work They can't say that because they don't know what the fuck they're talking about It's it's like someone trying to opine upon a culture that they've never read about it I've never visited you don't know what you're saying. Yeah, I've been told by people who Should know that there are a few European countries I shouldn't try to visit because they probably won't let me off the plane.

Yeah, because of that podcast. Bro, I'd stay in Texas if I was you. I'd hold up. I'm up in North Idaho, so I'm far, far away. You shouldn't have told people that. They don't want to try North Idaho. Yeah, it's a wild place. You got wolves and bears. This is just part of what people do. I was going to say, too, that overreaction is really counterproductive, too. Yes. Because to go back to what I said a second ago,

understanding brings you right up to the brink of empathy. More understanding to these issues. And I've found this 100 times, you know, because like, look, anti-Semitism is a weird thing. And we can talk about some of the history of that if you want. But, you know, it's this thing that people get obsessed with, you know what I mean? Like, it's not like part of their ideology. I've watched this happen to like good, clear thinking, regular people. They start listening to a few podcasts that they can't repost under their real name on Twitter because they're funny or interesting. And then pretty soon you can't bring that

dude to a party anymore because he just can't go 10 minutes without in neutral company like bringing up the Jews. And it's like that happens. You see that happen. I mean, the, you know, like what you see on social media a lot. I mean, it's like a, it's no doubt there's been like a big explosion of that kind of rhetoric, you know? Yeah. And I think a lot of it is online trolling and it's, you know, the fact that people are so sensitive about it that like it's just the easiest way to get a huge reaction, you know from from people I think a lot of it has to do with that But I think a lot of it also has to do with the fact that so many of these of these questions have really been

Made you know, it's not like they're off limits like they're illegal and you're gonna go to jail if you talk about them I'm still sitting here. I mean, I'm on your podcast and I so that's a big platform to talk about these things. It's not like that. But the attempt is to make it so that you can't be in any kind of respectable society. Yeah, the attempt is to make you radioactive. Yeah. And that, again, I think is just completely counterproductive because people look at something. I think Theo was talking about this in one of his recent interviews. He was saying, you know, somebody sees what's happening in Gaza right now, and they just see kids getting something. I think Theo was talking about this in one of his recent interviews. He was saying, somebody sees what's happening in Gaza right now and they just see kids getting pulled out of rubble and it's shocking and horrifying. And they see that and they find out that the US is sending

money and weapons. And I go, why is that happening? And they start looking into it and they go to the websites that are going to tell them the truth about it. And pretty soon one link leads to another. websites that are going to tell them the truth about it. And pretty soon, one link leads to another. And when they go ask one of their history professors at school or something, like, hey, Uncle Adolf1488 in the comments section told me x, y, z. He'd go and ask about it. He gets shouted down and attacked

for asking the question. And then that doesn't have the effect of him saying, wow, like, I guess that really is terrible and I should never ask that again. They think, hmm, that's weird. Like, why are people responding this way? I was asking that question in good faith, you know? And so it really has like the opposite effect of the one that is at least ostensibly intended, you know? I think there's a bunch of things going on simultaneously. I think some of this is coordinated. And I think, because I think that with everything now online, I think there's public momentum opinions that aren't necessarily

organically shaped. And there's groups that will mass tweet about something. And now we know that there's AI programs that will devise various different tweets, and people running them through hundreds of computers, if not thousands of computers, all with multiple accounts, and they're posting things constantly. And they're doing this, there was a call to make it illegal for any employee of the government to post on social

media. I was like, that sounds outrageous. That sounds like something that would stifle political discourse. I want congressional people to be able to be whistleblowers and to talk about what's really going on and this is why this bill can't get passed, this is why they added this to this, this is bullshit. But then someone explained to me that what they're trying to stop is astroturfing, is that if you're working for the government or for now, this is with USAID, the concept of the non-government organization comes into play.

So people realize that NGOs are actually funded by taxes. So it's a non-government organization doing the bidding of the government, and some of that may or may not include social media campaigns about specific issues. And I think this happens with everything. I think this happens probably on the Free Palestine side. I think they probably do it. I think it happens on the Protect Israel side. They do it. I think everybody does it. And it's confusing because you'd like to know how do normal human beings actually think, the actual world thinks, versus massive amounts of people that are being financially incentivized to post these things. They're being paid, they're a part of an organization that gets paid, they get funded, they have

a directive, they go out and they pursue this campaign, and they do it relentlessly. And they do it through organic ways, like people who are aligned with their cause, whether it's Free Palestine or Israel First or whatever it is, you get people to post about it. They'll do it willingly because they want to show everybody they're on the right side. And they also want to proclaim on Twitter that this is their political perspective and I'm aligned with you people. I'm one of the good guys.

And so there's that. That happens too. And this is this chaos of social media and people looking for likes and audience capture and all that stuff that goes on. But at the end of the day, we rely upon people that we trust. We rely upon people that are supposedly objective and rational and reasonable and considerate and charitable. People who look at things and go, okay, what's really going on here? Before I cast judgment, maybe I should pay attention to some of the things this guy's done.

Maybe I should pay attention to his work. Maybe I should look into this instead of just repeating Nazi apologist because someone wanted to take just an overall comprehensive look at what happened. Which is we should all want to know what happened from a bunch of different perspectives so we could prevent any of this shit from happening in the future. Yes, I mean the interesting thing about the World War Two question is something I found through talking to people who disagreed with my Tucker interview is if you put the question to them, and maybe if you put it directly like this, they would give you a different answer, but you kind of get the...you get to understand that this is how they feel about it, which is if there

was two options, one of them is that the Second World War doesn't happen, at least in Europe. Forty million people don't get killed. But the National Socialists stay in power and maybe Hitler dies 10 years later, like the Soviet Union, Stalin dies, and things move on. People really kind of feel like, and maybe this is because they're not involved in it, like 40 million dead people is that was a That was a cost worth paying and I think that is completely insane man, like it's it's

like if there was a sliver of a of an opportunity to Deescalate that situation and bring it back down like, you know, if I'm the emperor of America or Britain or whatever I'm I'm taking that chance. And if it turns out that Hitler's full of shit and, you know, he stabs us in the back first chance he gets, all right, then we'll have our war. But is this pre or post concentration camps? Is this pre or post the beginnings of the Holocaust? This is where it gets into that.

Like, should we decide to stop something in its tracks at whatever cost of life because ultimately that is the right thing to do because we're witnessing the genocide of people and then we're also witnessing a group that will remain in power that has not just committed genocide but is committed to genocide. Right. So what we were talking about and all of the points I was bringing up on Tucker were all from before that. In fact, they were from a full year before the German invasion of the Soviet Union. That was June 1941. And that's where most of the Jews lived. So if Hitler never invaded the Soviet Union, he never even would have had access to those people. Now, Hitler didn't like the Soviet Union, you know, all the way back in Mein Kampf

and everywhere else. I mean, it was central to his ideology that communism, socialism were the enemy and everything. He may have invaded the Soviet Union someday and gone and gone after all the Jews when he did. When did Hitler start going after the Jews? You mean in terms of in terms of rhetoric? Oh, so, yeah, like if you take him at his word in Mein Kampf, which is, you know, it's a piece of political propaganda,

you know, that he wrote as a sort of a politician in Germany in 1924. And so you have to take it was sort of a grain of salt, but it's also one of the few sources we have, like given his audience at the time, he probably didn't have a lot of reason to make this part up, is that he had been from small town Germany, right? And he was from a middle class family. His father was a civil servant, respectable people. And nationalism back then was very much like a middle class ideology. And the middle class

people, nationalists would complain about the workers and the proletariat, how they all want to be socialists and none of them have any national feeling and everything. And Hitler really didn't grow up with any really even knowledge of the Jews. He says his father, he never heard him say the word. And if they had any in the small town that he lived in, like they were apparently well assimilated because he didn't know about them. And so then he moves to Vienna when he's a young adult and there's a lot of Jews in Vienna. And he starts to, you know, he's at the bottom of society now. You know, he's literally living in shelters. He's hungry all the time. He's like down with the underclass after having grown up in the middle class. And so he's

starting to get a look at what the German people, the German masses, you know, that he's like sort of as a child and a young man has like worked up this deep sense of like nationalistic fervor, he's actually getting an up close look at the underclass in Vienna. And what he sees is not particularly impressive, you know, which is often the case when, you know, you can have sympathy for and want to lift up, you know, the underclass in any society. But the reason you want to do that is because they're often living degraded lives and degraded circumstances. And so he gets an up close look at this and he doesn't like what he sees. And he says in Mein Kampf that it really caused him like a moral crisis, an ideological crisis.

He's like, are these the German people? Like, really? This is what we're talking about? And then he says, and this is the way he relates it, he says it was actually the key that unlocked everything else for him is that he would say he realized, we could say he came to believe that, yes, these German masses, they are in a sorry state right now, but the reason for that is that they're being manipulated by the Jews, by the Jewish press, by the Jews who own the theaters and put out the films and whatever else, all of it.

They're being manipulated and corrupted by these people. And so for him, it became like, I think, you know, he has the, he had a lot of the same explanations and reasons you would hear from any anti-Semite then or now, you know, banking and whatever, like all those things were like in there. But I think the thing that gave it emotional valence for him is that his anti-Semitism was what allowed him to love the German people. It was like the only way for him that he could get around the revulsion he was feeling and actually being up close with the German underclass. He excused their faults by blaming Jews. And so his sense of love for his people. And I mean, look, Hitler's one of those guys. I noticed this when I was reading all the Jim Jones

books and stuff, which I think I read probably all of. They're not very good. Some of them are interesting, like they're good reads. But you can't help but notice, especially after you've read several of the books, that the authors just cannot help but be cynical and turn it into a polemic on every page. Like even the thing Jim Jones or Hitler did as a child, they have like negative editorializing to it and everything. And it's like, you know, it really kind of, it's a lot of them are still good books, you

know, you read like the most recent sort of great Hitler biography by Ian Kershaw is a great book. He's a good historian, an excellent writer. And you know, you have to learn to kind of see through that polemic a little bit and then you have, you know, a good history on your hands. It's almost like it's an obligation if you're going to cover a horrific figure, you have to look at things that way. Yeah, exactly. Yeah. And, you know, it's a... And so I think that people who knew Hitler before World War I, and we have like memoirs and interviews with people who did know him pretty well, they say pretty much unanimously, like, we never heard him mention the Jews back then. And this is the period in Vienna when Hitler says his anti-Semitism was developing and he was figuring these things out. And what I think was probably

going on, like my read of it, at least up to this point, is that his anti-Semitism, just like a lot of people in Europe at the time, it was theoretical and abstract. You know what I mean? Like the Jews had never... You got to remember like the Russian Revolution, all of the things that people like Hitler would associate with the Jews, like none of that stuff had happened yet. Like he might not like them, you know, he might think that whatever, all the stereotypes that go along with him, but it was just sort of an abstract thing that it wasn't dangerous, right? But then the First World War happens, and it's really impossible

for us today to understand the level of just trauma and devastation that that war had on the European countries that were in, or all the countries that were involved. I mean, was you're talking about a war where you know for for several Olympics Olympic games afterwards there were a whole sports that like France and Germany just didn't participate in anymore because they didn't have the people for it. I mean it was you're talking about massive chunks of the young male population being killed out there, right? And you take a guy like Hitler who volunteered early, like right away, and he survived the whole four years of the war, and you think about him as just an

example of this generation of people who spent like their most formative young adult years in the trenches. I mean, in constant terror of doing things that... I mean, forget about just like the physical discomfort of living there. I mean, you're in the mud, you're covered with lice and fleas all the time, so is everybody else. You're especially later in the war, you're like living off of starvation rations if you're a German or an Austrian, and you're watching... I mean, you know, Dan, his... Dan Carlin's series on World War I is like probably my favorite piece of audio. Incredible.

It's so good. And like, you know, one of the things he's so good at, way better than me at, is kind of capturing the scale of events. And so when he talks about the Battle of Assam, when the British lost 60,000 guys on the first day, you're like, I don't even know what that even means. It's just so overwhelming. And so you have this generation that spent their formative years in all of these countries under those just circumstances that we really don't have any context for us to relate to, you know? I mean, think about like, you see these stories of like people sleeping in trenches and over

there in the corner is their dead friend who's been sitting there decomposing and being eaten by rats for three or four days because you can't go up top to bury him because you'll get shot. And you can't bury him in the trench, in the dirt under the trench anymore because there's already bodies just completely wall to wall down there. You've already taken up all the space, right? Just that kind of... I mean, if you think about somebody today, if you walk outside your door on the way to work, your average person today, and there's a dead body on your steps, your average person today is going to be in therapy for years over that.

That is a traumatic experience, very difficult. So, you have these young men who go through this just unbelievable experience. From Germany eastward after, if you go back and think about what the map of Europe looked like in the year 1900, it didn't look anything like it looks now. It was basically like just a few big chunks. You had France, you had Germany, the German Empire, the Austro-Hungarian Empire, and then you had the Russian Empire. And there were a few like Spain, the Balkans and stuff, little things going on.

But really it was just a few giant empires controlled everything from the Pacific Ocean in East Russia all the way over to the coast of France, right? And everything east of Germany in 1917, 1918, those governments literally evaporated. They went away. And so, you know, you get to the immediate post-war period after these guys have just gone through this unbelievably harrowing experience. You know, their lives have been defined by violence for years, you know, at this point. And all of a sudden, there's just state collapse everywhere from Germany to Siberia. And you literally have, you know, private militias,

groups of veterans, communist militias, like they're running cities, they're running the streets like having running gun battles in the streets of, you know, of Berlin and Munich. And this is, this goes on for a few years, you know, just total social and economic chaos. And so you're talking about like the four-year war, but then a few more years after that. So you're 18 when you get in and 1914. Now it's 1923 when things kind of start to stabilize and, you know, you've been at this for like the first nine years of your young adulthood, right? This is the world that you live in. And it's a,

when you try to think of, you know, I talked about like Uday Hussein being brought to watch torture sessions or something. I mean, this is not exactly that, but it's an experience that like, we really have no way to relate to. And if you grow up in that world, especially when, you know, if you look at like what happened in Russia, 1917, the Russian Revolution, the Bolshevik Revolution, and they won. You know, they actually took over the Russian

state and created the Soviet Union. You know, it lasted long past the lives of anybody who had fought in World War I, for the most part. And so people saw that and they took the lesson, both from World War I itself, but also from the aftermath and the revolutions that happened. The lesson they took is that violence can accomplish our goals, you know? And whatever we do to accomplish those goals, as long as we survive, people accept it eventually. Roosevelt normalized relations with the Soviet Union in 1933 when Stalin was literally still clearing bodies from the millions of people he starved

in the Ukrainian Holodomor and in Kazakhstan, another million people. And at that time is when we and we knew it was going on obviously, and yet, you know, Roosevelt normalized relations with Stalin and people got over it. It's like with Turkey. Turkey does the Armenian genocide and it's condemned at the time, you know, they were on the other side of the war and everything. But a couple years later, like, look, Turkey is an important, strategically placed country, like, in the world, and we kind of need them on our side. And so, you know, sorry, Armenians, but, you know, get over it. And so people took that lesson, is that violence will accomplish

our goals. And as long as we accomplish them and survive, people will get over it, you know. over it, you know. But again, I think this is what's really important about your work is that you do take into consideration all these aspects, which again, with Jim Jones, that's fine. But you even what you're saying is it's obviously very relevant to what we're trying to more trying to understand how World War II happened. How did the Nazis rise to power? Like, what are we talking about? That's what we're talking about.

We're talking about this horrific environment that's not considered. That doesn't make you a Nazi apologist. Yeah, and it's important to note, too, that it's not like Hitler was going and giving big speeches at City Square in Berlin going on and on and on about how we're going to kill the Jews. And the German people said right on, like, let's go do it. That was like the speeches that are out there where he is talking about the Jewish question, like almost all of those are like internal Nazi party like rally speeches, you know. They're not him. He had to be careful about that. Like in 1938, which is pretty far down the line when Kristallnacht happened, it was kind

of a nationwide pogrom against the Jews in Germany that was launched primarily by Goebbels, the propaganda minister. But there was outrage in the German cities. People in Berlin, a lot of the places were outraged by what was going on. And Hitler had to actually get on the phone with Goebbels and say, cut this shit out. Like, this is not good. Not because he loves the Jews all of a sudden, obviously, but because this is bad propaganda. People are not going for this. And that was the year before the war started. And so these are just nuances that become pretty obvious when you just remind yourself that you're just talking about people. They're just people. I mean, the Germans were a sophisticated, advanced political and cultural, you know, place.

They didn't suddenly turn into demons for 12 years and then go back to being the nice normal Germans that we know now. Like these things happen the same way every other historical event ends up happening, which very often is not – what you find is it's not – it's not – so much is not really like the result of a plot or a plan or anything. People are often just reacting. And when you see this with the Bolshevik revolution in Russia, you see it with the Israel-Palestine situation, right? In those two situations, like the means that the Bolsheviks and the Zionists used to establish themselves and create their state and like sort of get their foothold. The means that they used were so violent and so over the top that it came

to define in a lot of ways the subsequent history of those countries. You know, if you look at like Stalin's purges in the 30s and a lot of the stuff that was going on during his reign, it was really that like they had pissed so many people off and done so many terrible things to take power and that was really like that was Lenin's philosophy is again just you know take it up to 11 and go and as long as we win people get over it but all of a sudden when you've killed all these people and done all these terrible things you look around the country and you see a lot of dangerous people who probably don't like

you even if they're not saying it right now, and you start to get a little paranoid and it becomes kind of the definition of how your state works, you know? I mean, Israel, one of the things I really tried to get into in the early part of that series especially is that the Zionist project, and the more I think about it, this is kind of a theme in so many of my podcasts. It started out as an idealistic venture. It started out as something, you have these people who are in really like kind of a unique situation. Maybe the Roma, the Gypsies are like the only other group of people you can really point to of like a widespread transnational group of people who do have a sort of cohesive identity, but they don't have a homeland. They're just

living in other people's countries. And, you know, I think the lesson from World War II and much of the 20th century probably is kind of the opposite of the one that people have taken from World War II, which is nationalism is bad and it's dangerous and bad things happen when people start to think that way. I think the real lesson from World War II is, or from what happened to the Jews specifically, is everybody needs a country. You need to have a country that is looking after you and looking after your interests because living in other people's countries, it can go well for a long time. But, you know, it's not just the Jews. Like, minorities in general, like, you know, bad things happen over time. You know, minorities are just easily scapegoated. You know, they're easily made the sort of the outlet for the frustration and resentment of people that are, you know, upset over unrelated

things. And it's an uncomfortable position to be in. There's also general suspicion when cultures move into areas and don't assimilate and then try to bring with them the rules of their land, which we're particularly scared of in America. We hear the concept of Sharia law. People start to freak out, well, there's people that move here that want that, you know, and they don't want to assimilate and they don't want to be a part of this homogeneous culture. They want to change it.

So that scares people, too. And America is very, you know, one of the. You know, America is a very unique country in a lot of different ways, but one of the ways that we're so different from the European countries, I mean, you can I guess you could point to a lot of things, you know, the lack of a feudal history that we were emerging out of. We kind of just started out as a liberal republic.

You know, the fact that we have like the frontier experience, which is just, you know, no Europeans can really relate to what was going on out there. I don't know if you've seen that new Netflix series, American Primeval. It's amazing. Dude, and like- I had Peter Bergen here this day. Oh, American Primeval. It's amazing. Dude. And I had Peter Bergen here. That's right. That's right. And all I kept thinking as I'm watching this is like, man, this is not like the US Army that's out there like on the frontier confronting these

situations. These are like the regular people who went out there and lived and this is an experience. So you have those things. But it's very accurate too. Yeah. It was fascinating. I love they had Jim Bridger in there. That was I've always been a fan of his. So yeah, that was amazing too. And how about the Mormon guy? Do people like young? Yeah, people don't realize today unless they really know the history, the Mormons were off the hook. They were gangsters. They were fucking dangerous foes. Yeah't fuck with the Mormons back then. They had been fucked with.

They were ultra cohesive and they were serious about what they were doing. These people were not playing games. This was not like a thing to do for fun. They were dead serious about it. And they had already been ran out of several states. Yeah. So I was going to say like the thing that's so different about America from a lot of the European countries and when we talk about

Nationalism like this is something that really You know that you have to keep in mind all the time is that America like we've been renegotiating our identity like Generation by generation ever since America started like from the very beginning. I mean if you go back to American Revolution and you know the the founding of the country in the late 1700s, before those guys were dead, a bunch of the major cities and eventually all the major cities, like very quickly by the middle of the 1800s, they're not majority Anglo anymore. It's not English people.

It's a lot of Irish, a lot of Germans, still a lot of Anglos. But you have to...and the fact that different religion, you've got Irish Catholics coming into this Protestant, very Protestant-time country. A lot of the Germans that were coming in were German Jews who were coming along. You think of people like Astor, the famous Astor family that was a German Jewish family that was in New York. And so that happens. And you're talking about, again, an influx large enough to really swamp the Anglo population in many of the big cities. Well, not another generation later,

barely 40 years after the Irish migration really hits its peak, huge influx from southern Italy, from Eastern Europe, a lot of Ashkenazi Jews coming in. And pretty soon, it's not just, you know, Anglos well assimilated, you know, Germans who are well assimilated to the Anglo culture and then the Irish, which is what it was before. Now you have just as many Jews, just as many Italian Catholics who are Catholics like the Irish, but they're still not quite, you know, there's still different communities. And we've just had to do that all the time. Even in 1924, when we kind of shut down immigration

after the First World War, you know, we basically shut down immigration from 1924 to 1965. There was some, but very limited and very selective. But as soon as that happened, as soon as the immigration pipeline was kind of from Europe was cut off, that's when the great migration of African Americans out of the South starts. And in about 40 years, you get six, seven million African Americans coming mostly from the country South into places like Detroit and all the places that you kind of associate with large African American communities now. It's kind of crazy to think about, but if you go back to the First World War, Detroit's African-American population was like 2%.

And that was Philadelphia, Baltimore, I think Baltimore had like eight or nine, but that was how it was. Pretty much all African-Americans still live down in the South. And so over the course of about 40 years, they all move out to all the big cities and you have to still, like they're from America obviously, but like you've got to renegotiate like your identity with these people and figure out like a new political compromise in these cities in the various places. And when the great migration of African-Americans starts to peter out, 1965, we reopen the floodgates

of immigration with the Hart-Celler Act, and that's the world we're kind of in now. And so that's, and look, especially back in the day, in the first two big waves of migration into the US, the Ellis Island migrations, like those were, like America would not be here today if we didn't do that. Like, there were not enough out of work English people, you know, over in England to come over here and take over this whole continent.

It was just never going to happen. The only way it was ever going to happen is if we were radically open and tolerant to people, you know, because you go back to...there's a naturalization law, I think it was the first naturalization law on the books in the United States, 1798. And you see a lot of like racialist types point to this as if it kind of backs up their idea of what America's history is and what it should be. Because it says all white persons of good care, all free white persons of good moral character, if you come to the United States, can become a citizen. People see that and they focus on the white part and they say, see, they

wanted America to be a white country or whatever. That is totally the wrong way to understand that law. I mean, if you were to go to like France or Germany or England or whatever, for them to pass a law that said, anybody in the continent, any European, you know, you guys can come over here and we will make you a citizen with the full legal rights and privileges of our richest citizen. You know, you will be an equal citizen. You can just come here, radically open. I mean, really like a revolutionarily open kind of law, especially back then. You got to remember, like, the Europeans still had another 150 years of just wantonly slaughtering each other, you know, left still ahead of them. You know, you had like, today, I mean, if you have like a person who lives to the left of you and they're the Thatcher

family and they're vaguely English, and then you have the McCoy family on the other side and they're vaguely Irish, they're just kind of white people to you now. Like it all kind of seems like what's the difference? Dude, go tell an English and Irish person that they were the same thing back in 1798. Like they did not identify thing back in 1798. They did not identify with each other at all. There was a lot of bad blood, a lot of hostility. And so to say all you people with all your differences, you come over here and get with the program and you can be one of us, just radically open. And again, we had to do that

or else the country would not be here or it would be an Anglo country sort of clustered around the 13 colonies and maybe moved in a bit. But, you know, we wouldn't have been able to hold this whole continent against the French and the Spanish and everybody else who was around unless we were that open. And so that was like a prerequisite for America becoming what it is today. In Europe, it's very different, man. Like there's such thing as a Polish person.

And Poland is the country where Polish people live, you know what I mean? And like over here in America, like we have a much more fluid identity. We're constantly having to renegotiate it. And it's, we think it's difficult today, you know, to integrate the immigrants that we've got and to try to renegotiate that. It's always been difficult. And to try to transfer our way of thinking about social identity, our way of thinking about, you know, what a nation is to the European countries, it just does not apply. It really doesn't work It's also there's a thing when an all-white country wants to stay all white where people get very nervous of if you have

You know Let's say China like China is Chinese people we we all agree that it's like It's filled primarily with Chinese people, we all agree that it's like it's filled primarily with Chinese people. There's people that live there from all walks of life, all over the world, but it's mostly Chinese people. If China had decided that they wanted to remain Chinese and stay Chinese and that being Chinese is very important to what China is, no one would have a problem with that.

When a country like Poland does it, you're like, oh, those white people, they want to keep everybody out. They want it to be all white. That's post-World War II. That's post-Aryan race talk. That's post-Nazi stuff. That's what people are legitimately freaked out about. That's the most recent stain in our history where we look back and say, wow, that was close.

Evil almost won that one. I think it also has to do with, you know, the interesting thing is, you know, Poland, Hungary, a lot of these Eastern Bloc countries, even though communism was extremely hostile to national identity, you know, and really, I mean, took a lot of brutal measures to try to stamp it out because they wanted everybody to be a kind of new Soviet citizen, you know? Those countries that are over there now are much more comfortable sort of saying, yeah, Hungary is a country where Hungarians live and this is a Christian country and we want to keep it that way.

Whereas all the countries that were on the other side of the Iron Curtain under the influence of the United States kind of had our traditional way of looking at these things kind of imposed on them, you know what I mean? Or they absorbed it through osmosis. I don't know if it's like a program or something, but they, you know, we were the dominant sort of cultural and military force and everything else, political force. And so they kind of, you know, absorbed the American openness and tolerance of all comers that we kind of had to have, as I said, in places where it really makes no sense at all. I mean, you have, you could at least say like with the British Empire or something, you know, they colonized all these places. And so now like those people in the former

colonies, like they're moving to Britain and, you know, you could, like I don't really think of it this way. You could look at it that way, though. If you look at a place like Ireland, Ireland didn't colonize anybody. You know, Ireland was a colony. They suffered terribly under the British for a long time. And yet it's very interesting that, you know, they were willing to be brutalized, be occupied, be starved, all of these things for centuries to defend their little slice of the world where their people could work out their destiny among themselves, you know, endured so much for that.

And then you get up to about the 1960s, 1970s, and you know, you can look it up. This is like a, this isn't like a conspiracy theory. It's the first things that come up on Google if you look it up, that, you know, Ireland is on track to be minority Irish by like 2070 or something like that. It's like, I don't like that. You know, people think of diversity as like every place on the planet should look like Jackson Heights in New York and like then we're diverse. But that's to me that's not diversity at all.

Diversity is I go to Ireland and it's Irish. I go to China and it's Chinese. You know what I mean? And turning it all into sort of a homogenized like mixed soup. I think when you put it in those terms, nobody really wants that. But people get very uncomfortable. And in America, with immigration specifically, it's really hard to like... The fact that it's not like we're a Christian country in the sense of it being worked into our political culture so much or anything anymore, but still like the values that most people, even atheists and everybody else kind of that inform their moral outlook, are derived from that legacy of Christianity, you know. And it could be very hard for somebody who is

working from that moral base to come up with a reason that... I mean, look, imagine you're in a room and you're sitting at a table and across from the table is a man, his wife, and their two kids and they're from some poor part of the world and they wanna come, you know, they wanna be a part of your country. You're not gonna be able to come up with a reason that justifies keeping them out. I mean, the only one that you could come up with is that when you open the door to that room, there's 65 million people standing in line outside and you can't do that. But like on an individual level, people really have a lot of trouble. And I think this is a credit to Americans in a lot

of ways, even if it causes us a lot of confusion, that it is hard for us to turn people away like that. And yeah, I think to go back to like what you were originally talking about, I think the World War II story is a huge part of that. It's a huge part of why people... I think that some of the lessons we drew from that war were kind of maybe not the right ones to take and that they have led us to the point where a culture like Ireland, who was not involved in the Second World War, never colonized anybody, feels like they don't have the moral right to say this is a country for the Irish, this is a little island where the Irish people get to live together and work out our destiny.

Well, here's the question. Is it coordinated immigration? Are they going there because there's job opportunities? Are they going there for a better way of life? Are they being told to go there? Like, what's causing the mass immigration to Ireland? It depends on the country. I mean, it's like...

But like to Ireland in specific? Yeah, Ireland. There's a lot of like, um, Polish folks in Ireland, people from Eastern Europe who go there for work, you know? Um, that's, that's the, the, the primary like source of migrants, but there's a lot of, um, you know, there are a lot of third world migrants or global South migrants there now, but a lot of Eastern Europeans come in there for work. Yeah.

It kind of varies from country to country. It's interesting because I do agree that it's cool that you go to places and they're uniquely, like I love Scotland. You go to Scotland, it's uniquely Scottish. You know, you go to places, you get to take part in their way of life. Like to see the world through their culture and the way they view things, it's interesting.

But I also love the melting pot of America. I love it. And I come from immigrants. My grandparents came here during the early parts of the 1900s. And so I'm thankful that they were courageous enough or their parents were courageous enough to get on a fucking boat before YouTube. No idea what was going on over here. It was just promises and hopes and try to carve out a life and that's where I came from. So it would be insanely hypocritical of me to deny someone who came from another country

an opportunity to partake in this place. But I also think that it's coordinated. And I think that they're doing it in America for a lot of bizarre reasons that you could attribute to trying to stack states and trying to overwhelm democratic voter registration in swing states and allow people to vote and give them a pathway to citizenship and allow them to vote and you know get them on the dole get them on whether it's social security we've talked about this before where people were encouraged to say that they had bad backs or headaches so they could be permanently disabled on social social security and just then

you have a customer you have a client and then that that client is going to, you're going to call upon them to vote for you. And if you only need 10,000 votes here or 20,000 votes there, and they're objectively shipping in 10 times that much to some of these swing states, you got to wonder, like this is not just, this is kind of taking advantage of the charitable aspect of Americans, how we view people wanting to come here for opportunity Which most of them are just doing that most of them are people that unfortunately Were born in a place with no possibilities and a lot of crime and a lot of danger and they have a family and they Want to do better and they came here and I love it. I love that they do that. I love that they make it

I love that this is a place for that But that can be taken advantage of that can be taken advantage of. That can be taken advantage of in order to control the political parties, in order to tighten down on the laws, tighten down on the surveillance state, get everybody to use an app, put everybody on central bank digital currency because it's more stable, have a social credit score system to make sure that everything goes well. And then the next thing you know, everyone's self-centered. Everyone is Twitter before Elon bought it.

It's just, it's a dangerous place for freedom. And that's ultimately what America has to say that we stand for above all. This is the place. If there's a place on earth where you can be free, this has got to be that place. This is what we came here for. It's where the founding fathers, this is what they were trying to do. With all the flaws and all the terrible things that took place here, yes, absolutely.

Land acknowledgments, hallelujah. But at the end of the day, this place is supposed to represent freedom. But freedom can be manipulated. And you can use your empathy and they can use it against you and Unfortunately, you have to be aware that there's nefarious forces that are involved in all areas of Society where enormous amounts of money can be transferred and that's how you have to look at it this is ultimately about money and Whether it's about money bringing in people for cheap labor

which I think is fucked because I think if you're an American if you're here if you're here we're gonna call you an American you should get paid what a fucking American gets paid you should get health coverage you should get everything shouldn't be able to like get people just because they walked over here and you get them to work us for slave wages that's ridiculous that's insane That's anti-American. I mean, I'll hold you up there. It might be like anti-American ideals, but that's the history of America right there. That's the whole history of America. It's true. It's true. And that's the dirty little secret of construction sites.

You go back to the 1850s, 1860 you know, Irish dock workers on the East Coast, immigrant Irish dock workers, their life expectancy was 14 years from the time they stepped off the boat. And these weren't 60-year-olds coming over and working on the docks. You're talking about young guys who came over to do that. 14 years, you know, and... Horrible, brutal jobs. With, I mean, completely expendable human resource.

We all remember the photos of people working on the Empire State Building, walking on the beams. Yeah. Just no safety, nothing, leather shoes. Yeah. Fuck off. I'm like, there's a lot of, you know, they have those political tests online kind of tells you like what you are if you answer some questions.

What are you? I always end up right in the center, but I always have to tell people that I'm the last, the farthest thing from a centrist. It's just I have a whole bunch of views that are very far right and a whole bunch that are very far left according to this thing at least. One of my far left views before this World War II series got kind of pushed to the front of the queue because of the Tucker controversy. I was working through a series on the history of the American labor movement. And you. And people today think of teachers unions and corrupt big labor organizations and so forth. But to me, the American labor movement,

the first part of it, it's America's best story, in my you know, you go back to the 1880s, 1890s, or I did one on the Battle of Blair Mountain in West Virginia when 10, 11,000 coal miners who were just being brutally exploited by the mining companies and their mercenaries, I mean, they took up arms and they were ready to...like, they were marching on the county next door to go free some of their compatriots and to hang the sheriff. I mean, and they only stopped because the US Army finally showed up. This is right after World War I. The US Army showed up and a lot of the guys who the miners were World War I veterans and they, you know, they weren't going to fight the army. Like they were sort of, not even because

they were afraid or discouraged by their prospects, they just weren't going to, you know, their problem was with like the sheriff and the mine, you know, the mine operators and stuff, not with the army. They didn't want to fight them. And so that diffused it. But, you know, you go back to those early to those early decades of the labor struggles. And I mean, people really have to like... It was not some aberration when striking workers got a bunch of people killed, like where a bunch of Pinkertons or other mercenaries or even government forces. I mean, you go to like a mine, a coal mine in Colorado back in, I think it was 1912. And the National Guard of the state,

which was completely... There was not a lot of people in Colorado at the time. So the National Guard and the state government was completely run by the mining operators because they were the most important thing in the state. And the National Guard took up positions with machine guns up on a hill overlooking the striking miners' encampment. And the miners were mostly all gone because there were authorities looking for them and stuff. There was a lot of their wives and children and so forth. And they just opened up on these people and killed like 22 women and children. And that kind of thing was... That's an extreme kind of example, I guess,

of the brutality, but smaller versions of that, that's how it was. People didn't believe back then, or a lot of people, the capitalists didn't believe back then that you had a right to strike. Today we're like, yeah, if you don't want to go to work, you don't have to go to work. And if you all do it together, that's a strike. Like, you know, of course people can do it. That's not how they thought about it back then. You know, they thought you were, they thought of a strike as like a form of sabotage. And so the authorities would be brought in, mercenaries would be brought in to deal with these people. And you're talking about, people think of socialists today or something, right-wing people. I really try to get this across to them that today you

think a left-wing socialist or whatever, and you think a blue-haired college student who's screeching to you about this, that, or the other. Back then, you're talking about guys who, and women too, actually, in certain cases, but guys who spent 12 to 14 hours a day turning a wrench or swinging a hammer. And then after that, then they go to their meetings, and they get home to their family and they sleep for four or five hours in a basement two-room apartment that's got mold growing on the walls and they have a bowl of cabbage soup with their four kids that live in this horrible place. And then they go back and do it again the next day. These were like working people who were... I firmly believe if it was not for their sacrifices, we would all still be working under those

kind of conditions. Like the capitalist class and I'm not trying to sound like some kind of a Marxist or something. I'm just that's what they were. Like they were not going to compromise with the people unless they were forced to. And those people, they went out on the picket lines, they fought, they died. In fact, if you go up to a little bit later in the early 1900s, you know, probably the thing labor unions are most famous for these days is like the corruption, the mob involvement and so forth, labor racketeering. And that kind of got started in the early part of the 1900s. But the interesting thing about it

is the way it started was, you know, the owners of the businesses, they were hiring like real thugs. I mean, the Pinkertons, the different groups that they would hire, they would get people just out of prison, you know, violent people, war veterans, and they would send them against the striking workers, have them spy on the workers, have them kidnap like guys who are trying to kind of get people into the union and so forth and get rid of them, you know, this kind of thing was happening. And so the unions started to say, well, we need some muscle too.

And so who's the muscle? Well, if you got a bunch of like Irish and Italian guys working on this dock, the toughest guys they know are the gangsters. And so they'd be like, you know, we'll pay you, we need you to defend us from, you know, make sure that we don't get our teeth kicked in by the Pinkertons. And so they would do that. And you know, they ran into the trouble that, you know,

it always presents itself in situations like that is, you know, the people you hire to come in as muscle start to look around and be like, why do we have to take orders from these people again? Right. Can't we run the show? And that kind of started to happen you started to get these You know the unions that were racketeering or organizations and so like, you know, these are things about You know

history is extremely messy, you know, we have to always remember like people are often making making like the crucial decisions that like turn history this way or that, you know, zig instead of zag, are often made under crisis conditions by people who sometimes they're great men and women, but a lot of times, you know, they're the person who happens to be there at the time and they're doing their best and they're taking advice from the people that are around them. And they're, you know, they're making the decision that's going to determine if we head off in this direction or that direction, you know. And you can't, you know, there was one time, right, like, probably I can tell the story because it's probably it's back in the mid 2000s when I was still in the military.

because it's probably back in the mid 2000s when I was still in the military. I was over at my friend's house. He was at the hospital picking up our other friend who had a bicycle accident and hurt his head. And he was picking him up and coming back with him. And so I was going to meet him there so we could hang out and welcome him back from the hospital and so forth. So I get there and I call him up because he's not home.

And I say, Richard, I'm here like what's up? He's like, ah, the doctors are being slow. Whatever. So I'm gonna be a little while. Well, I got a big 20 ounce venti You know Starbucks black coffee and so I pound that thing in my car as I'm reading a book and pretty soon I start to feel that pressure in my gut Like I gotta take a shit like I have to take a shit. It's like that caffeine shit, right and I call up my friend like like, where are you? Like, I need you to get home now. He's like, the doctor's having him brought him to me.

I don't know what's going on. He's like, go see if a door or a window's open or something. And so now I'm getting up and moving. And so that's making things worse, you know? And I check all the doors. I check all the windows. Nothing's open. And I'm in the backyard and I'm like this close to just digging a hole in this flower

garden and taking a shit in this flower garden. But then all of a sudden I look up and there's a balcony from the master bedroom with no stairs down to the backyard, but it's a balcony, you know, there's no access to it. And I'm like, I'll bet they didn't lock that door. And so I kicked my shoes off so that I can, they were loose on my feet, so that I can more easily climb up the pole and pull myself up there. And so I'm just in my socks.

And at this point, just the effort of the strain of pulling myself up to this thing, it's coming right now. And that's just what's happening. And so I run up, the door's open, thank God, and I run in and run into the master bathroom. And for some reason, but again, like this is a crisis moment, you know, I'm not like taking everything into account as I'm making decisions here.

I get in there and as I run in there, I see that there's no toilet paper. Now the obvious answer there is cross that bridge when you get to it, You know, take a chance. You gotta go. But at the time I was like, oh no! And so I ran out of the bathroom, I'm up on the second floor, I run over to the stairs and they have one of those stairs that, you know, kind of goes down halfway and there's

a little platform and then right angle goes down the other way. And I have to go so bad that I just jump down the first flight of stairs and then I jump down the second flight of stairs, my socks hit the tile floor, slide out, I fall on my back, bang my head, and shit everywhere. I mean, it's like going up my back, it's horrible. And I, my head is like ringing, and I'm ashamed to say that like I laid there in my shit for like at least 10 seconds,

because I was sitting there thinking of like all of the opportunities that I had to like you know change course and avoid this that are so obvious in retrospect and you just sit there and think about like when you're in that situation like you don't even stop there you think back on like your entire life and you're like how did I how did I get here it's like that record scratch like you're probably wondering how I got into this situation like, how did I get here? It's like that record scratch. You're probably wondering how I got into this situation. That's where I was. This doesn't have anything to do with the overall point

I was making, but the really shameful part of it is I cleaned it all up and you could still, like in the grout and the tiles, I couldn't get it out, so it still kind of smelled shitty. And when my friend got home, I didn't tell him this for years afterwards, when he got home, I blamed it on his dog. And he yelled at the dog on my behalf. I told him years later. But so yeah, like, you know, how old were you at the time? Too old to be doing shit like that? I mean, but that's like, you know, that's a funny way of putting it, but like that's

history a lot of the times, you know, you're making decisions on the fly that you're not necessarily having time to reflect upon. And you know, you get into a situation where you're like, how did we end up here? Yeah, you know, I'm glad you brought up the labor movement because I feel exactly the same way. And knowing the history of the way people striking were treated and what could have happened, have they not been successful? You know, people want you know, you think about unions, you think about corruption and waste and fraud. That's unfortunately that that happens a lot, and greed. People making too much money.

I mean, they blamed a lot of the unions on the collapse of the American automobile industry in Detroit. You know, that they were, they wanted too much money, they were too greedy, and they sent everything overseas. And then, you know, the whole Flint, Michigan thing, Michael Moore's documentary, Roger and me, it's one of those things where, unfortunately, we look at negative aspects of it, we don't have a full perspective of where we would be without that. When the powerful, and this is what everyone's afraid of on the left and rightly so, when the powerful have so much and their resources are so vast that they can control everyone else and that they could stifle your ability to earn an income, they could siphon off all

your money, they don't have to pay taxes, they fuck everybody over and they just want more and more and more and it's a blight on society. And I think there's like, I think we both agree there's like some sort of a comfortable middle ground. I don't believe socialism is a way to run a country, but I do think there's socialism aspects of our country that we can't ignore are powerful and important. One of them that I bring up all the time is the fire department. Fire department is a totally socialist idea.

Like you don't have to pay the money. Like, if you live in a house that's worth a million dollars, or if you live in a house that's worth $200,000, they put out fires. If you can afford it or if you can't afford it, they put out fires. We all agree, you gotta put out fires. We all kind of agree you should have a good education.

But obviously, states are different in the resources and local districts are different in the resources and you see very nice neighborhoods that have really good schools and you see terrible neighborhoods that have terrible schools. So we don't really completely treat that the way we should. That should be a socialist thing that everybody should get along with, that everybody should say, yeah, that's good for everybody. Another thing is, and this is very controversial, but socialized medicine. The idea that you should go broke because you broke your leg is fucking crazy. If we're a community of people that are supposed to be supporting each other and helping each

other, the best thing we could do is help one of the members of the community become active and productive and contribute to society. That makes everybody better and greater and we should be willing to contribute to that. But I want my orthopedic surgeon driving a fucking Mercedes. I want that guy to be a bad motherfucker who gets compensated for it because that's the type of guy who becomes an artist. That's the type of guy who works on the Lakers' knees. the type of guy you want like oh, that's Mike. He does the Cowboys whenever they have shoulder injuries That's the guy you want that guy you want the guy with a nice watch You want the guy who lives in a big house because that guy is fucking dialed in and focused

You don't want a guy who doesn't feel like he's being compensated enough. You don't want a guy who feels like he's expendable You don't want you want a guy who feels like he's a fucking rock star That's what you want. If you want your mom getting brain surgery, right? You want a rock star surgeon doing that? So I believe in competition and I believe in merit and I think it's very very important for our society as a whole But I also think there should be a much larger safety net for Individuals so they don't go broke if they have a fucking knee surgery. Or if you break your back, you shouldn't have to fucking go bankrupt. That's kind of crazy.

And I think labor unions are very important. It's very important to not allow a corporation that is entirely designed to make as much money as possible dictate how much money its workers get because the Poor you are the more desperate you are the less likely you are to do anything about it Right when you get comfortable and you want to be more comfortable and you say this isn't fair We could sit out for six months. That's when you become dangerous Yeah, right have the ability to strike, when the Writers Union in Los Angeles strikes, that's a fucking real problem, man. That's a real problem.

That shuts everything down. And they get recognized because of that, and then they get hopefully fairly compensated because of that. It's an important part of our society. Yeah, there's also, I think, due to our unique history of kind of having demographic turnover generation after generation, more or less since the beginning that... If you look at the development of things like the public school system, for example, or a lot of the social welfare programs and other social programs, a lot of those things emerged

because there was all of a sudden a huge influx of Irish in the 1830s and 40s. And their parents are both working 14-hour days and the kids are just running the streets and everything else and there's no public schools. They didn't have any at first. And so it was like a response to this. They're like, we got to do something about this. We got to take these little hellions and turn them into Americans somehow. And so you had philanthropists. It was all private at first, and then like they were transferred to the city governments and stuff. But they were responses to like demographic crises, right? They were emerging

due to like the migrant influxes. And I think that that being the case, it's kind of given Americans like a... Because, you know, the native population who was already there when that happened, they didn't like it. They're like, wait, so these people came over here and now I have to pay to like set up a school system for their kids? Like what? It created like that sort of resistance to, you know, the question of what we owe each other as members of a society, you know? The idea of like, I feel like we've kind of taken, like America's the best country in the world.

If you are smart, motivated, you got a great idea and you want to make something of it, go to America. Like America's the place for you. Throughout most of our history, if you were just like a person who, you know, you could turn a wrench or swing a hammer or something, Mary was not built for you. You know, it was built to create opportunities and push competition for people that compete for the top of the mountain. But the people at the bottom, like throughout a lot of our history, were just kind of forgotten.

You know, the real question is, in a country that is so geared toward competition at the top, whether that ever would have changed without a real push, you know? And I mean, one of the other things too is like when people think about... You go back to like in Europe where they were really worried about communism, we were never really justifiably too worried about it in terms of having a revolution here or anything. Like that was never really a danger. But if you go over to, especially after the Soviet Union came around, from basically Germany eastward, communism, it was a very real possibility in the 1920s that the German Communist Party, which was the largest political party in Germany, it was taking its marching orders directly from Moscow, that they were going to win and they were going to take over and you were now going

to be like, what's going on over in Russia and Ukraine? Like that was a real thing that could have happened to them, you know? And when people hear that, they think that, you know, again, they try to put it in the context of like a modern left-wing person or something like that. But it's like when people are working under these conditions and the socialists, the communists are like literally the only political movement that's even vying for their support. Nobody else is even really even courting them or asking for it, you know? And when you add to that, like this whole idea of like the working class, like this isn't something that has existed forever. Like this was something that was emerging in different times in different

places. But like really in that like most like in some developed countries, you started to see it in like the 18th century, but it's like a 19th century phenomenon where all of a sudden, so you think you go back to feudal times and you've got the aristocracy, you got the church and you got the peasantry. And then you have like another group of people who kind of serves a unique function but kind of a uniform function across Europe in the Jews. They would very often be like... They played a very kind of critical role in feudal Europe because they were the only ones who had a network that kind of stretched across the whole place. And so a lot of times, like the rulers would have Jews working for them who, you know, they were basically like

your diplomatic channels, kind of. You need to like talk to people over there. Or if you needed to raise money for something, they had large capital networks that could help you raise money for it, things like that. But they weren't serfs or peasants. They weren't the aristocracy. They weren't the church, obviously. They were kind of their separate thing. And most of the time, they were allowed to sort of abide by their own laws, like run their own little societies like how they wanted. But this was at a time when it was just taken for granted that different classes of people had different privileges and different rights. You know, it was just, everybody took that for granted. It wasn't even something that was imposed. A peasant or a serf would

have believed that as much as the king did. It was only when you start to get up into the Industrial Revolution that all of a sudden you start to see these cities just teaming with people who have no land You know, they don't have any means of like immediate self-sufficiency What they have is their back and their shoulders and their hands and you know they trade that for the means to survive and You know this happened very rapidly in a lot of countries so that you have this whole new kind of happened very rapidly in a lot of countries so that you have this whole new kind of politically awakening demographic, you know, because that's sort of kind of the key to it is at first, you know, it took some time for them to sort of have a political awakening where they recognize

that, wait, I'm not just a worker, I'm a member of the working class. And we have, you know, whatever our differences, the working class has common interests that are in opposition to the interests of these other classes, that we're gonna start to, you know, organize and act politically to extend those interests and to achieve them. That was something that was very new. And so people were kind of figuring out again on the fly, like, how to deal with this, like, what, You know, the idea that just regular poor people who, you know, that they should have any say in, like, how the state is run, how the economy is working. It was just completely foreign idea, like, everywhere on the planet, basically, until,

you know, 200 years ago or so. Which is pretty bizarre that we've had to adjust to that so quickly. So many changes so rapidly. Changes in transmit, the ability to move people, transit, the ability to take people from Europe quickly relatively to America. Trains, machines, the industrial revolution, all this happening, cities emerging, like enormous populations, and then the squalor in which those people are living in, which is, I mean, that's really the dirty secret of the beginnings of all these cities.

These people were shitting in outhouses, public ones on the street. Everybody lived in squalor, rats, disease, horrible nutrition. In the winter, you don't get any fresh vegetables. There's nothing there to get. Everyone's malnourished. Everyone's living terribly. And everyone's terrified that they won't have enough money to put food on the table. And they're all under the oppressive thumb of whoever has the most money who could provide them with jobs. Yeah, and you know, and it was a world where, you know, the husband breaks his back, you know, you better hope that you're a member in good standing of the nearby parish church,

because there's nothing else for you. Right. There's no, I mean, it might be some charity or something that, you know, some rich lady set up or whatever, but like that was not going to save everybody. I mean, there was nothing, you know, for those people. It's a scary thought when you think about the history of the human race about people generally had sort of specific roles in society that you could gravitate towards and that would be your trade. And that would be your way to integrate with society. You were a blacksmith. You did this, you did that.

Everybody found a thing thing did the thing and It all sort of cohesively worked and then all of a sudden you have jobs They know a bunch of people waiting in line and soup kitchens, and then you know you have this Oppressive factory environment where first of all everything's coal-powered So you're breathing mean they do a great job in Peaky Blinders of highlighting that like the streets are gray everything's a dull dark gray so everybody's getting polluted everyone's sick period you're sick because there's shit in the streets everyone's riding horses the horses shit everywhere there's shit everywhere

your your whole existence is hell yeah And then you have massive organized crime, violent, horrific, gangs of New York style, organized crime all throughout your city, violence everywhere. Yeah, the history of organized crime is actually like for people who really want to understand America in the late 19th and throughout the 20th century, like reading a few books on the history of organized crime is a good window into that. It's gonna give you a perspective like from the bottom up rather than sort of from the top down, you know?

So when you read history, I mean, and the further back you go, the more true this is, and it's something you really have to stay humble about. You know, you consider the fact that like today, like things that are happening today, right? we can't seem to agree on things that are just extensively documented and there's like in newspapers and video, whatever else. We can't agree about what's going on or what, you know, the president's motivations are, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah.

And you go back further in history and you're dealing with like scraps of information a lot of times. And the further back you go go the worse it gets. You know the idea that it's you should really like be careful when you really feel like you start to understand people you know from a from a time long ago because it's I mean for one thing I mean even if you I mentioned was like look you're first of all you're dealing with sources written sources which automatically means you, you're first of all, you're dealing with sources, written sources, which automatically means you're re you're you're getting your information from the very, very, very few people in that society who knew how to write, right?

Just like just that. And even in more in more recent days, when, you know, if you go back just into more recent history, you have like diaries and stuff, right? It's like we had, even then, you're talking about like the kind of person who would keep a diary. That's not everybody. You're talking about a certain kind of people. This is still something that like really affects the way we, like the news is reported about places around the world all the time, right? You'll remember back during the Arab Spring when things were jumping off in Egypt and they were interviewing, it was like CNN or one of them, I don't know, interviewing their

correspondent who was like there in Cairo on the ground, like talking to the people or whatever. And according to her, these are just, these are all a bunch of liberal people who want freedom, and they want democracy, and like da da da da da da da. And you know people people see stuff like that and maybe sometimes there is like an aspect of this to it but people see that and they're like oh this is propaganda. This is bullshit and she knows it's not true and CNN knows it's not true but they're trying to sell this to us. A lot of times it's like no man look you have this lady who works for CNN and New York Times

or whatever it is who goes to Cairo, who do you think she's gonna talk to? Like, how would she even know how to find like your raggedy person, like living in the slums or something, or how to communicate with that person in their own terms? She's gonna go to the people she knows there, who are all gonna be educated people,

middle class or higher, and say, hey, can you put me in touch with people I can talk to? And who do they know? You know what I mean? And that kind kind of this same thing is true in Russia. You know, with Russia, you know, there's there's a faction of people, there's always been a faction of people in Russia who are not fans of Vladimir Putin. And interestingly, it's it's sort of the same social class that really doesn't like Donald Trump in the United States. You know, a lot of the civil servants and bureaucrats, a lot of the professional, like, urban people who

those are the ones who don't like them. Well, if you're a Russia correspondent for one of these major media organizations, these are just the people that are going to be around you and who are going to be influencing the way you think things are going. And so a lot of times that makes it over into our news is like the people are ready for a revolution, the people are ready to get Putin out of there. He's actually hated and everything. And it's just a distortion of reality based on the sourcing, you know? Right.

Like going on blue sky, talking about Trump. And I mean, this is sort of postmodernism 101. The useful side of postmodernism, youism, the unpoliticized useful side is going back through and reading the text we have and looking at the information we have and sort of doing an archeology on it and understanding that... I would say like an early example of like that type of postmodernism is Euripides' play in ancient Greece, The Trojan Women, because like what he was doing is like, you know, everybody knew the Iliad, they knew the story of the conquest of Troy

and all that, but he wrote the story from the perspective of the women who actually lived in Troy and went through the, you know, the conquest. And it's like, you know, you have to remember that that almost everything, and again, I sound like some hippie, blue-haired college student when I say stuff like this, but you really have to keep in mind that when you're reading history that is written exclusively by men, exclusively by adults, exclusively by the upper class and the small cast of people who are actually literate and writing things down and for even leaving aside like the political circumstances, they were putting constraints on the way that they could describe and write about things. Just the class bias that's introduced, you're getting a very, very narrow perspective. It would be like coming over to the United

States and asking a random person on the street, hey, you know, who's this Donald Trump guy? Like, what's he about? You're an alien. You don't know anything. And they say he's a fascist dictator who, you know, is going to ruin the country and destroy the country. And then going home and being like, yeah, the Americans hate this guy. He's a fascist dictator and like, he's going to destroy the country, you know. And if you, if you think about it like that, and then imagine that, then imagine that those people or people who are on the other side, whatever, but one side are the only ones that are writing anything down, a lot of times our understanding of history is very much based on that kind of a narrow view. You know what I mean? Yeah. When you are putting together a piece like Fear and Loathing in the New Jerusalem, how do you account for that? Like how do you try to have this balanced,

nuanced perspective when you're getting, in the many cases, a biased perspective that you're researching from? Yeah. And the biased perspective is one that I can't avoid. I mean, I guess I could with enough work, but is that I only speak and read English. So just that by itself. Like when I was doing that story specifically, like the early history of Zionism and that conflict, I'm reading English sources, which especially if you get back before the last couple of decades, are almost always telling you the perspective of the Zionists to a large extent just because

there's not a lot of... There weren't a lot of Arabs in Britain and America and stuff writing books about what was happening. And so you have that bias by itself. And the thing that somebody asked me on X the other day, I was doing a Q&A and they said, how do you... How can we... What do we have to do with some of the steps we have to take or whatever things we have to take into account to make sure like we're getting an objective view of history. And I told him like, I don't think that's a viable goal when you're doing this stuff. Like, you know, the goal should be understanding, you know, on a human level and just you have to just maintain a sense of humility and a sense of the limitations

of your own ability to really, to really understand what's going on, and just constantly keep in the front of your mind that these are human beings making human decisions based on human motivations. And if you do that, maybe you won't have a perfect picture of the events that took place, because again, we're just limited. There's a lot of huge historical figures, somebody like Alexander the Great or something. What we know about them is based on extremely small stack of papers. And so yeah, that sort of humility, which was kind of imposed on me at the very beginning because the Israel-Palestine series was the first one I did. And I was reading, and after I had read maybe like six books or so, something like that,

I was like, okay, I kind of get this. I'm ready to start writing this first episode and plotting it out. And so I do that, and it takes me a while. I'm still working my day job at the time, so it takes me a few months to kind of get it to the end of it. And by then, I've read 20 books or 30 books or something. And I went back and went through the notes and the plot and everything that I laid out. And it was embarrassingly bad.

I mean, it wasn't just like you got this wrong or that wrong. It's just like whole sections of the story that I am so far off base that it's not even you can't even call it wrong. And I thought about that, I was like, and I had read six books about this topic. You know how many topics there are that I've read one book on that I will just pontificate about for hours unless you stop me?

And so like it kind of forced that sense of humility on me a little bit, you know? It made me realize that, you know, even if you're well educated in a subject like there is just and this is one of the reasons to one of the one Of the I'm convinced anyway that one of the reasons my Tucker interview got as much Of a response as it is Tucker obviously is very Clever about courting controversy, you know, he knows what he's doing and at the very beginning he you know, he knows what he's doing. And at the very beginning, he, you know, he introduced me as like the, the best and most important, you know, contemporary

historian in America today or something like that, right. And I know the guys like, you know, the historians that came after me afterwards were just inflamed by that. And I'm sure that was Tucker's, you know, goal. But I've always, you know, I say the same thing Dan Carlin always says. I'm not a historian. I read the books and the papers and the other things that historians write, and then I tell a story about them. The historians are learning the languages, going into the archives, interviewing survivors, et cetera. I'm not, that's a historian, you know. I'm a storyteller who uses historical stories to try to tell my stories. But like, yeah, it was funny too,

because the night before he was kind of saying that, and because we were having dinner the night before, and I was telling him this spiel, you know, I'm not a historian, historians do important work, da da da da da. And he's like, yeah, well, I'm gonna say that on the show tomorrow So don't fight it. I was like, okay I

Would let you say it I think you're an educator like an unconventional educator I mean, I think that's the best way to Describe it if you're the way you describe like say the the Jim Jones disaster Guyana tragedy the way you describe that if I was in high school I'd be like this fucking teacher rules dude my favorite so pumped to go to that class my favorite emails to get from listeners right or while my favorite email my favorite two emails probably had to do with it Israeli Palestinian thing you know one of them was from an active duty IDF soldier who was serving in the West Bank who said that

he listened to the podcast and that it actually altered the way he deals with Palestinians on a daily basis in his job. So that was pretty awesome. That's amazing. And then I got another one from this 20-year-old girl who lives in the West Bank, but she'd only been there for about two years She'd gotten permission to move there from the Israelis her whole family was in Gaza And she wrote me about two or three months after the war kicked off after October 7th And she heard the podcast and you know, she said you could tell I mean for sure like there was a lot of anger

It's like the way the Israelis were conducting the war and the way they treat Palestinians and all that, very justified anger. But she said she listened to the podcast and it made her realize that the Jews are just like her and that the... They say Jews over there and they mean Israelis, but like, it's just they use the word Jews because that's what they are. That's how they understand it. And she said, there's probably a Jewish girl who lives in Tel Aviv who's just like me, you know. She loves Harry Styles and da-da-da. Anyway, those are amazing emails to get. But my other favorite,

and this one I've gotten probably 100 times, is it'll be from somebody who will tell me, tell me their story a little bit. They'll say, you know, I was always kind of the kid who sat in the back of class. Like I was not one of the smart kids, you know, maybe not one of the dumb kids, but I wasn't one of the smart kids. And reading things like history books, that's what smart kids do. And I'm not one of those people. And so I just never even, never even shifted into that gear or anything. He's like, but I heard your podcast on Jim Jones or whatever, because my friend sent it to me. And now, that was a year and a half ago,

now check it out, this is my bookshelf. I've read all these books. And the best part about it is you find that that experience changed the way they think about themselves. They really opened up their own human possibilities in certain ways. And I don't want to take, I'm not taking credit for that.

They're doing it. But I really feel like, you know, we can think of kids like, we all know a million of these people, like back in school, where that's the dumb kid, right? He's just like, gets Cs if he's lucky and he's not any good at math, whatever. But then you get him talking about cars, you know?

And he's like, and he will break down, I mean, everything about a Honda Civic engine that you can possibly, I mean, and you realize really quick, like, oh, this is actually a really smart guy. He's just nobody's been able to engage him on these topics before. And so he thinks that those aren't for him. And he's not engaged in them. But you get him on something he's really engaged with, this dude's super smart. If you could give him an IQ test that like purely drew from like him when he's talking about cars, he would be above average. And that's like almost everybody, you know, it's a matter of just like being able to get people engaged.

And that's my favorite thing to do with the with the podcast is get you know, when people who didn't think they were into this kind of stuff realized that you pull them in with a good story and a good presentation, but then they kind of take it from there themselves. It's really great. Well, it's engaging and it's fascinating to learn about human beings. And we've been told that everybody has a 10 second attention span. This is the TikTok generation. And I think that's one of the things that I'm most happy about with the emergence of podcasting is that it's kind

of thrown a monkey wrench into that. People are curious. We're still the same. We're still interested in things. We're just easily distracted. And we're constantly being bombarded by information and data, but you don't have to opt into that. You can step out of that and you can actually be interested in things and it will enrich your perspective, which will help you as a human being. It'll help you navigate life. It'll help you navigate relationships and friendships and careers. The more you know, the better. The more you consider other people's

perspectives, the better. The more you get a chance to listen to how an expert describes what they know about a specific thing and what's fascinating about it and how it engages them and how it's enriching their life. Like that's good for everybody. That's good for everybody who listens. It's good for me to be able to sit here and talk to these people. You know, it's good to be stimulated. It's good to be curious. It's good to expand your understanding of life, this life that we're all experiencing together. You know, and I think that's where podcasts and your podcast is very different than mine, obviously, because yours is actually really planned out.

It's almost like it should be a different category than just a podcast, but that's where those things are, like, really important, because they do engage people, and they do get people that, as you said, might not have thought that that was for them, and all of a sudden they're like, Jim Jones, how did he do that? Like, and then you get into your series on it,

and it's utterly fascinating. Like, I am particularly fascinated like a lot of people with cults, because we all have this thing in the back of our head when we see something like the Jim Jones cult, or Waco, or anything like, what would I do? Would I be one of those people? Would I be in that group?

Would I be drinking the Kool-Aid? Would I be with them? Like, how does a person get sucked into cutting their balls off and putting the purple Nikes on and waiting for the spaceship? How does that, who, what causes that wild, wild country? I'm sure you've seen that. Incredible. Dude, my grandmother, this is my uncle's mom, but she babysat me all the time as a kid.

We all call her grandma. Sheila, Ma'ana and Sheila in there, was her sister sister-in-law. She was hiding out. I didn't know this until after I saw Wild Wild Country. I was like, have you guys seen this? Just casually dropping that. They're like, oh yeah, you don't know about Sheila? And they like, she used to stay in when she was hiding out before she fled the country. She was like being hidden in my uncle's bedroom for a while. Oh my God. Yeah. So that's fun. Wow.

That's crazy. That's crazy. But to answer your question, though, as far as how people get sucked into it, the thing that is, just shines through again and again, no matter what you're talking about, whether it's any of the stories I've talked about, is that very often people

get sucked into it because, not because of like some latent evil in their heart, but because their virtues get hijacked. Hitler is a good example. That is somebody who could say whatever you want about him. He loved the German people and he cared about the German people. But that love, I mean, it's very... I mean, it's like the... I was reading an article a while back about the neurochemical oxytocin, and it's the chemical

that basically makes sure that a mammal mother doesn't eat her baby when she gets hungry. And honestly, it takes the form of like increasing trust and empathy and so forth. But they've also done research and found that it also, like that it increases trust and empathy and all those things for your in-group. But because you're more protective of them, like feeling that way, it actually increases distrust toward anybody considered like in the out group. And so it's like, makes you love your child more and makes you hate like the foreigner more

or something like that, you know? And a lot of things are like that where it's really your virtues that get hijacked. I mean, if you think of, I mean, yeah, you were talking about Jonestown. I mean, that story sucked me in so much, you know? Part of the reason for that is because I just got obsessed with it. But part of it is that, you know, the U.S.

authorities found like a thousand hours of recordings at the Jonestown site after the massacre, and they're all available online. And it's like sermons of his. It's them just having meetings in the middle of the night. It's just all kinds of different things. Well, for like three or four months, I had that in my headphones for like, at the time I was working overseas when I worked for the Department of Defense and I was working by myself overseas. And so I'd be working and I'd have my headphones on eight hours a day. I'm listening to Jim Jones just ran in my dream. I was dreaming

about him for real. But through that experience, what I found is I and even to this day, like I say, I will still say it, even after I'm separated from it's all over is I really sympathize with those people the same way I sympathize with like, you know, and I get into this in the series to like, you know, the radical movements and the civil that emerged out of the civil rights struggle, you know, the Black Panthers and whatnot, who, you know, they went down a dark road. But when you put yourself in their shoes, you know, because say what you want about like if Jim Jones, just like for people out there who don't know, I mean, go listen to the podcast. But, you know, Jim Jones was a guy who in like 19, I think 53 is when he started his first church in Indianapolis. And it's a totally open, like, mixed-race church in Indianapolis. And he and his congregation are going out and putting pressure on businesses to, like, start serving, you know, to desegregate and start serving African American customers and stuff. This is a couple of years before Martin Luther King in Birmingham or whatever.

He was like out front on this, right? And he would, you know, his wife would, they adopted the first, they were the first white family to adopt an African-American child in the state of Indiana. His wife would walk down, you know, walk down the street with their adopted child, and she'd get spit on, called an N-word lover,

all these kind of things. I mean, he was getting death threats from the American Nazi Party, from the KKK, which was very strong in Indiana back in the day. But he was still doing all this. And if Jim Jones would have gotten hit by a bus in 1962, he would 100% be remembered today as an early hero of the civil rights movement. Jones would have gotten hit by a bus in 1962, he would 100% be remembered today

as like an early hero of the civil rights movement. Like he really would. And when you say like, how did people get sucked into it? Like you think of somebody, like one of the first things you notice, if all you know about the Jonestown story is Don't Drink the Kool-Aid, you know, you've heard that. The first thing that stands out to you

when you pick up a book about it is that 75% of the people who died out there were black. And, you know, as soon as I had been doing another project about the great migration of African-Americans out of the south around that time. And so I thought about it, I was like, man, these are all like first generation people out in San Francisco, where the Jonestown cult was based. Because, I mean, you didn't really have the big migration out to the West Coast until the Second World War and after the Second World War.

And so, you know, you take just like as one example, there was one of the women that died out there. She was like 70, 72 years old or something in 1978 when they all died. So she was born, you know, she was born in whatever 1906 in Alabama, and she's this black woman, right? And so her, she goes through, lives the first 40 years of her life under Jim Crow in Alabama, going through that. And then her and her husband decide to, you know, they get up the gumption to, you know, get on a train or get in a car or whatever and go out to California. This is, again, back when the world was a lot bigger for people back then. You were going off to California, it was goodbye for the most part. They didn't know what they

were going to find out there, but they were going to go give it a try. They get out there and her husband's working on the Oakland Docks and they live kind of in that Oakland docks area that today is you know so run down. He dies early just from overwork and like everything else and she's there now in her in her little stoop you know front porch house, street side house, living by herself in a neighborhood that is just completely falling apart. You got drugs and you got gangs and like she gets, you know, harassed when she walks down the steps and all these kinds of things. And so this is her life now. It's like arguably, I mean, not, not even,

I wouldn't even say arguably like other than just the, the indignity of being told you can't drink out of that drinking fountain or something. Her life was actually more comfortable in Alabama under Jim Crow than it's become in this Oakland ghetto. She's safer. She lives, at least over there, she lived in a place that was a community. It was a group of people that knew her since she was a kid and she lived among them.

Over here, she's completely alone. She has nobody. Her whole experience of her whole life with white Americans has been virtually, unanimously negative. At the very least, like, you know, if not abusive or something, it's been like condescending, you know? And somebody tells her, somebody that she knows from somewhere says, hey, you got to come check out this new church that I'm going to. It's called the People's Temple. Come on down. There's this guy, Jim Jones. He's amazing. And so she goes down there and what she finds is a group of people. It was not their, their like, their sense of like real equality between people, not just racial, but just across the

board. That was not a game. They were 100% serious about it. They, and so she shows up to this place and she's not treated like in a condescending sort of social justice way where it's like, oh, let us help you, you know, or anything like that. They're like family. These people were a family. And like, it's the first thing to understand about the Jonestown incident is that these people loved each other. They cared about each other. And this woman comes in after her whole life experience, being alone now in Oakland and just everything else came before that. And now she's babysitting the white lady's kids and they're calling her grandma and sitting on her lap and she's not treated like she's a charity case, she's treated like a member of the family. And so

you get those people who feel, who have had that experience, that side of things, right? That's going to bind you together in really significant ways. And they end up, you know, going down because of the because of the just the temper of the times. You know, this is a civil rights organization. If you look at what happened with really like both both threads of the protest movement in the 1960s, you see this thing happen where it starts to build up in the 1960s and you have like the campus anti-war kind of hippie type protest side and then you've got the civil rights side. And both of those are kind of within the energies being channeled into outlets that are, they're not anti-social. You know what I mean? Like you got Martin Luther King, like leading a movement, telling the people,

basically like it's an American civil rights movement. It's not a, he's telling them, we're not getting the rights we deserve as Americans. And that's what we want. You have guys like Malcolm X who didn't think of it that way. They felt we're an African diaspora and we're a people and we need to like focus on that. But as long as Martin Luther King was alive, he had the moral weight

within the movement to sort of fend off the emerging black power elements and stuff that were coming in. On the other side, like the campus anti-war left, if you go up to like 1968, the year of the big riot at the Democratic convention in Chicago, Eugene McCarthy was senator running for president, and he was like the only person in the political spectrum who's going to be available for the office of president who was... He wanted to end the Vietnam War. And when you think about like, this is a time... This is not like today we want to end the Iraq War or whatever. It's like, no, like this is a time this is not like today we want to end the Iraq war or whatever it's like no like this is a matter of life and death for these protesters like you know it's a matter of

like are they going to get drafted and sent over to this jungle to get killed for something that almost everybody at that point even like the president the secretary of defense we have their like backroom dialogues and stuff now knew was a lost war and a point it was pointless to continue other than for like vague reasons of national honor and you're going to have to go do this, maybe die, definitely kill, you know, and go do it. So this is important to these people. It wasn't like just an ideological thing. And then the Democratic Party just completely, openly, ridiculously like just steals the nomination from Eugene McCarthy. You know, the Hubert

Humphrey who they put in, he didn't win a single primary. He wasn't even put into the process until way, way late. He was just installed. It was a Kamala Harris kind of thing like in the last election where they just decided it. And so you had all these people who were – like they had the Clean for Gene movement which was all these hippies, all these like college radicals and stuff who've been letting their freak flag fly all this time. They all cut their hair and they shaved and got good and clean cuts so they could go door to door to like normie middle class people and talk to them about Eugene McCarthy. In other words, they committed to like, they got with the program. They were like, okay, we're going

to do it the right way. We're going to do it, you know, through the right channels and institutions that we do that. Civil rights movement was doing that under Martin Luther King. Same year, you have McCarthy gets, you know, robbed of the nomination. They try to protest it, and they get the living shit kicked out of them by the Chicago police. On the other side, obviously, Martin Luther King gets killed. And what you saw after that is all that energy that had previously been channeled into these productive and pro-social outlets, it just scattered to the winds. Those things got delegitimized and all of a sudden it just goes in every direction. And that's when, starting really in like 1969, that's when the weathermen came about. Weathermen you know, most of the stuff we associate with the 60s.

But then into the early 70s, you just see this massive proliferation of cults and violent radical movements. You know, you had like an offshoot of the Black Panthers out of New York called the Black Liberation Army, and they were just hunting down cops and killing them, you know, dozens of cops across the country. They just hunted down and killed. You had just truly insane groups like the Symbionese Liberation Army. You know, they were like just led by a guy who was like legitimately mentally ill, had been in and out of institutions and he went to like, you know, one of the like, you know, bitter clinger, like last holdout sort of radical enclaves in Berkeley and found a bunch of lesbians

there who were like radical feminist lesbians and got them to follow him. They're the ones that kidnapped Patty Hearst and, you know, got her going and everything. And Jonestown, like the reason there's such an interesting story to tell, like, and this is really like the angle I took on it, is they're a microcosm of the whole movement, you know? In the mid-50s, they're idealistic, they're in it for the right reasons, they truly believe in what they're doing, they encounter resistance, you know, from political resistance, social resistance, and as that resistance stiffens and then gets really serious, you know, when you've got people coming into the church who worked for a Modesto TV station telling them that, hey, I'm coming to you because I was just approached by the FBI asking

me to come spy on you. So I don't know what's up there, but you must be doing something right. So we join them, you know. You got that kind of stuff going on and these people get Radicalized and then they turn violent and you know out of paranoia and and drugs was a big part of it They lose their shit. What drugs are they doing? Well the drugs were not They were still done sometimes but like they weren't really technically allowed for like the the members themselves But Jim Jones was on he was basically for like the the members themselves, but Jim Jones was on He was basically for the last ten years of his life. It was

Amphetamines when you get up barbiturates to go to sleep and it was every day for ten years And which is not the best for perspective. No, no, and it's like that's the thing. That's a thing with Adolf Hitler, too Yeah, you know you keep yourself going that way and you know somebody who I had read a little bit about the effects because of the Jonestown story, I read a fair amount about the effects of long-term amphetamine use, the paranoia and mayhem that it can result. And so as I was getting up to the last episode, I asked one of my buddies who he was a police officer in SoCal, If he had any ways, if he could figure out, get me some police reports that were incidents where there was usually a husband and father who had taken his family hostage, and specifically if he was hopped up on methamphetamines, that resulted in a murder-suicide. And he got me a big stack of these things. I don't know where he got

them or if he was supposed to, but like he got these for me and I was able to read through them. And about half of them, they ended in a murder-suicide. The other half, like some of them, the guy got shot by the cops, some of them he gave up, but about half of them ended in murder-suicide. And as I just read through these just again and again and again,

I mean, it became very obvious, like this is what happened except at a larger scale in Jonestown. It's hard for people to kind of accept when you're talking about somebody like Jim Jones, who was like a raving lunatic by the end, but he loved his people like he actually did. People say, well, if he loved them, that's not possible. How could he do that? Those are people who have never been around like domestic violence before. It's very complicated. You know, you can have husbands who are absolute monsters to their children and their wife, but they still love them. And it's weird.

And like they have like an emotion, like a serious emotional crisis if they leave or something, you know, and like it's just, it's very complicated. And Jim Jones was like that way. And actually like, you know, having gone through that process of reading about it and understanding it in this way, you know, it remains to be seen if I still think this when I finish all of my reading by the time I get up to the end of the World War II series. But I see a lot of that in the Hitler story because, you know, Hitler was like, if people think of him as like a politician, they're missing a big part of what he was about.

Like, if anything, he was more like a prophet figure. He saw himself as like almost like a... not a religious figure in the sense that he was sent by God and anything like that, but that he had this like sacred mission to save the German people. And these were not political questions, you know, whatever. It's why he just... he never compromised, even when it seemed insane not to compromise. Like in 1923, when the French invaded Western Germany to take over a lot of their industrial area,

all the parties, right, left, and center, all came together to like oppose that in Germany. And he stayed out of it. He'd ordered all of his, you know, his whole party to stay out of it because he was not gonna accept the compromises that were gonna come with working with the other groups. And so, you read about like, you read some of the reactions that people would have to him. This is just like Jim Jones, where if his shtick works on you, man, like

you read some of like, Joseph Goebbels is his propaganda minister, you read his diaries of like him describing meeting Hitler and going know and going through and it's like almost Homoerotic he loves him like truly and he was not homosexual But like he loved it off it would truly loved him and that's the effect he had on his followers like across the board If his stick didn't work on you you were just like yeah How could anybody follow this guy's crazy? He's like vulgar, how is this possible? Same thing with Jim Jones. And...

Well, same thing with all cults. With all cults, like if it doesn't work on you, you're revolted by it. This is what's so fascinating about all cults in the beginning, they seem great. Like the Jim Jones thing in the beginning, what a great idea. Bring everybody together, we're all family, you know, it's complete equals. Let's all live together in harmony. That's Wild Wild Country too. In the beginning, it looks great.

My friend Todd, we went out to dinner after the Wild Wild Country came on and he goes, in the beginning I was like, I want to join. What can I do? It seems like a way better way to live life. Duncan was probably already buying his plane ticket to Oregon. Yeah. It's just they all turn bad and they all go the same way. It all goes to like sex and drugs. And I don't understand it. It's so weird. Yeah. They all sort of start off pretty fun. Yep. And they always have hot women too. Oh, that is just a big part of the program.

I don't know how this works or what it maybe it's just because the cult leader type like even if he's crazy is still like an alpha male type so he attracts a stable a good looking young ladies or something. But it's like as I was going through reading about all these cults, all of them, there's hot women everywhere. Nat. You have to have them or you can't get the men to stay. Nat. Yeah, exactly.

Nat. That was the cult out here. There's a cult, before we bought the Comedy Mothership on 6th Street, which was the old Ritz Theater, we were in contract with this place called the One World Theater that was owned by the people that were running this cult called the Bodhi Theater that was owned by the people that were running this cult called the Bodhi Tree that was the subject of the documentary Holy Hell. I didn't know about that until I was under contract. My friend Adam was like, have you seen the documentary?

I'm like, oh no, this fucking documentary. And then you watch the documentary and that's what it was. It was a guy who was a gay porn star and a hypnotist who starts this cult and he gets all these yoga people. He's teaching yoga and he gets all these yoga people, he's teaching yoga classes, gets all these yoga people to live together and in the beginning it looks amazing. It looks like so much fun. Everyone's doing yoga, they're eating healthy food, they got a community together, they live together, they grow food and then of course it goes sideways.

You know talking about the the Symbionese Liberation Army in 74 they you know there was a huge firefight in South Central Los Angeles where they were holed up in a house and it was just a 500 cops thousands of bullets flying and then the house burned down and they all died inside and I read this somewhere I don't I don't have like firsthand knowledge of this so I don't if you've ever heard it heard it before but that a big John McCarthy his dad was an LAPD cop, too He was like a major figure in that he like won a medal for valor like for like doing things during the during the the shootout There oh wow, just saying yeah, I didn't tell me if I'm wrong about that, but I'll ask him

I didn't know that shout out to big John the original yeah, um Yeah, it's just so strange that the pattern repeats itself over and over again of one person with the answers, one charismatic figure who believes they're right and gets a bunch of people to go with them and in the beginning makes a very,

very attractive environment for these people, really does foster the sense of community and belonging. And then eventually, it all goes sideways. And it almost always has to do with some sort of either amphetamines or something along those lines. I mean, that's something that really happened that derailed the protest movement, not just in the People's Temple cult, but in general. If you read about... You lived in San Francisco for a while, right?

Yeah. When did you live there? So I was seven, so there was 71-ish. Okay, so this is like around... No, 74-ish. 74-ish. OK, so just like around. No, 74-ish. 74-ish. It's around this time. You read about how everybody thinks about the summer of love

and it was all chill or whatever. But by the time you get up to 67, that's really kind of like in a lot of ways the end of the flower power era of the 60s. Not the beginning of it. A lot of people think the summer of love in 67 kind of kicked the whole thing off. It didn't.

By that point, all the people who had been in, they were smoking herb and doing mushrooms and LSD and everything, things had started to switch over and people were doing speed like crazy. Well, especially after 70, right? Yeah. When they passed the Sweeping Psychedelics Act. It didn't cover prescription amphetamines. In the pool player community, where I was playing pool all the time, guys would take amphetamines and play for 36 hours in a row. And it was a war of attrition.

The whole thing was to see how long the other guy would be able to hold up and what kind of mixture he was on. And it changed the culture you know of course because I mean a culture that's based around LSD and weed whatever is totally different than a culture based around speed you know. Look at cocaine movies look at the 1980s everything's a cocaine movie they're terrible yeah you go and watch like LeMans go watch like some of these like really interesting films from the 1970s or the 1960s. And then you go 20 years forward, you're like, what the fuck happened? Cocaine happened.

Everybody started believing that everything they did was awesome. Yeah. And it's one of the reasons like, you know, I know people talk about the beginning of the war on drugs and, you know, that a big part of it was about having a way to like get in and prosecute like civil rights activists. Yeah. And that's all true. At the same time, like I look back on those people, you know, Richard Nixon, I don't know, maybe it was like, what was he like 50 or 60 or something in 1970. So he's born in 19, Sky born in 1910. We just closed the frontier like a few years before that.

And like he's born in 1910 and people are watching like the transformations that are taking place in society that already just culturally are so mind bending in terms of radical change. Yeah, and seeing like the increase in violence, the, all of the things that are coming with the new drug culture, especially once it started to move away from psychedelics into street drugs and stuff.

And thinking that like this is... I think that they had those motivations, like they thought this is a way to get at these people we need to stop. But I also think that they really believe like, this is crazy, this is a real problem, and we've got to do something about it. I mean, you know, there's a, there's one of my episodes, it's part of the Labor Series, but it centers around this teachers union strike that happened in New York City in Brooklyn in 1968. And it became like a... It turned into a big blow up between... Actually expanded even past the city, but especially within the city between the black radicals

and activists and the Jews in the city. Because the teachers union in the New York City public schools at the time, the teachers and administrators like seventy five percent Jewish. And in this one particular school where the parents, the kids, everybody are getting radicalized by like the black power ideas that are emerging in the latter half of the 60s, especially in New York, because they got Harlem up there and Harlem was always kind of the fountainhead of that kind of thing. They came into conflict over, you know, how the school was going to be run. But part of it, you know, the way the conflict kind of really started off was the teachers were like going to their union and they were going on strike not because they wanted like more pay

or anything like that. It was because like teachers were getting raped. They were getting beaten. One of them got set on fire. It was like crazy, like what was going on. And there was, in one of the books that I read about it, it was talking about, it wasn't specifically just about that, but they quoted the head of the agency in New York City that dealt with like drug addiction services and stuff. And they said in this one school, there were more drug addicts among the students, one school, there were more drug addicts among the students. And they actually said more hardcore drug addicts among the student body than we have at our city agency, the resources to deal with. One school. And so

it's like, those are crazy times, you know what I mean? Jesus. I think about like, the 60s are so wild because you know there were there were pilots in Vietnam who got shot down and taken prisoner in like 1963 and they got released in 1973 and just imagining like they were listening to Buddy Holly or whatever when they came out and You know before they went and they come back and I mean all the 60s has happened, and they're like what in the hell is going on?

Can you imagine? Could you imagine? Also, can you imagine being held in a Vietnamese prison for 10 years in a war that you, there's no way you can justify it. There's like no one has, and they probably know the Gulf of Tonkin was bullshit. Fuck, and you come back to America has and they probably know the Gulf of Tonkin was bullshit.

Fuck, and you come back to America and you see Led Zeppelin, like what happened? Yeah. What did I miss from Buddy Holly to Jimi Hendrix? Yeah. You know, Jimi Hendrix is dead at this point. Oh, so you have to like go back and listen to recordings and you know, what the fuck did I miss? You know, you can't even watch it on YouTube. Like, how's this guy playing the Star Spangled Banner with his teeth? Like, what happened? What fucking happened? You know, your wife, if she stuck around for those 10 years, it's like, you know, she used to be nice and obedient. Now she wants to go out to work and she's not taking your shit.

You know, like things have just changed so rapidly. And whenever a society goes through like that kind of a rapid transition, there are always going to be just people who fall through the cracks. There's always going to be people who spin off in wild directions. Yeah, always. And this happens in microcosmic levels, too. You think about my father's side of my family.

They all came out from like Kentucky and Alabama during the Dust Bowl, right? They're like crazy Scots-Irish like Appalachian folks who came out to California during the Dust Bowl. And so I know a fair amount about like the Oakey migrations and everything and the the Appalachian migrations up to the Midwest like a couple decades later. And one of the things like people, I guess it's just not a well-known history, is that a lot of the stuff you saw with when African Americans started moving out of the South and facing resistance like nobody wants them in their neighborhood and all these other kinds of

things, the Okies and the Appalachian folks in the Midwest got the same thing. Nobody liked them. You know, there was an incident when a bunch of Okies were coming into Los Angeles County, and as they were approaching, the authorities found out about it. The sheriffs went and blocked the road, and they're like, nope, you're not coming here. Get out of here. They were not liked. And the thing is, part of the reason for that was it wasn't just straight up bigotry or something. These people, they had habits and ways of life that were very different than the people, the settled people in California were used to.

These are crazy country people. They drank a lot, they fight a lot. They're poor as shit, so there's like a higher percentage of the criminal class among those people and things. And so people really looked down on them and isolated them, at least for that first generation. And you see it when you have these people who, they were farmers, that's why they came out here. They were farmers, the dust bowl came, they can't farm anymore. They at least

farm workers. So they're rural Southerners who are used to working in agriculture. And now they've got to go move into a big city and try to find a job. That's going to be a huge adjustment. A lot of the community that they had in the place they're they got to go move into like a big city and try to find a job. You know, that's going to be a huge adjustment. A lot of they're like the community that they had in the place they're coming from. A lot of times the marriages don't hold up under the strain of like the transition. The communities, they kind of scatter and fall apart. You lose that and people just start to fall through the cracks. You know, and you saw that with

the African-American great migration, you saw with the Yokes, and you see at any time there's like a rapid transition that people have to go through that, you know, some people are going to make it, but some people are not going to make it. And very often, you know, the unfortunate thing is the people who, the people who don't make it through that transition in one piece, very often like form the reputation that the rest of society sort of attaches to those people. You know what I mean? Yeah. Yeah. And do you ever read Gladwell's take on the Appalachian folks too? That they emerged from herding populations and that herding populations had to be particularly violent because you had to defend your cows because someone could come along your sheep

and steal all of them. Whereas if you're a farmer, it's very difficult to steal all your corn. It's very difficult to steal all your crops. Like it takes time. You have to pluck them. You have to, you know, pick them, carry them. And that these people had a very violent past because they were used to defend. Like if they stole your sheep, they stole your food. You starve to death. Winter's coming. You had to defend it and they were particularly violent. This is why you get into some of the feuds that happened in those areas, which are legendary. They all came from, or at least all the early settlers who kind of set the tone for Appalachian culture, they were all Scots-Irish and North English borderers who were basically right

on the other side of the aisle from Ireland there. And these are people, this was like a lawless part of the country. This was a place where the central government was far away and it was infinitely smaller than anything we think of a central government. Now there's people were up there on their own. And so you still had clan feuds, you still had like all these things.

And then over in Northern Ireland, when the British settled the plantation there, you've got conflict between Protestants and Catholics, between Irish and the Scots that they brought over there. And so these people were from a hardcore culture, and even little things. People would talk about, they would complain when they came to America about how these people don't take care of their houses. And the reason for that is that over there, your house can get burned down, you got to build another one. They just didn't think of these things as like permanent fixtures the same way like you here in Boston

do or something. So it filtered down to just like cultural ways that were very off putting to the people who are already settled here, you know, but those Appalachian folks are they're tough man. And they, you know, I mean, you go all the way back to the Revolutionary War and every war ever since then, they've basically been the core of the American combat forces. And that continues right up to this day. And it's interesting to, it's another one of those things to like,

you just wrap your head around who our ancestors are and what they went through. The Puritans, the part of East Anglia that a lot of the Puritans came from in England, there was, this is in like, this is a hundred years into like the settlement of America. So you're talking like the early 1700s. There were still a couple churches in that part of England that the doors had the human

skins of Danish raiders who had come over to plunder their shit, who they had killed, skinned, and put them on their church doors, just as a sign. So it's like, dude, these people are hard. That's like another species. Nat Fassbender Holy shit. Yeah. Yeah. It's very difficult to take people out of the context of the world that they live in right now. It's very difficult to even imagine living in a time like that. Yeah. You know, I think that's one of the more fascinating and important parts about history and long form history podcasts in particular because they're so entertaining and engaging.

Like Dan Carlin's and yours and Daniele Boleli, he's great at it too. There's a bunch of people that do it now. And it's a very difficult path mentally to try to even imagine yourself in a time like this. Yeah. yourself in a time like this. Yeah, you know, I'm a giant fan of Dan's series on Genghis Khan and the Mongols. Just try to imagine living in a time where there's a group of people that have formed a super army for the very first time and they've killed 10% of the population of Earth. And they're sacking entire cities, burning them to the ground, piling up the bones in

the middle of the city to where people walking up to it think it's a snow mound. They don't even know what it is from the distance. Yeah. And like you live in a world like before modern communications or anything. So it's not like over the course of five years, like tensions with the Mongols are increasing. We think there might be a war or anything. It's not a horseman like speeds up to your city panicked and says there's a huge army over there. They'll be here in 36 hours.

And that's it. You got to get your shit together and go deal with that. It's crazy. It's crazy. And this is the reality of people who are unfortunate enough to be born at that time. And we are very fortunate to be born at the time that we're born, but still we are going to be looked back upon by future more enlightened civilizations the same way we look back upon the Mongols. We will look back upon what's going on in all the wars in the world, all the things that we've done, all the things that we continue to done, the lies, the propaganda, the taking advantage of people for financial gain, all the things that we continue to have done, the lies, the propaganda, the taking advantage of people for financial gain, all the things that we do right now.

They're going to look back. Factory farming, that's my big one. Yep. I'm 100% certain that, like, eventually down the line, they're going to look at us the way we look at slaveholders because of the way we do factory farming. Oh, it's disgusting. It's a horrific way to live. And unfortunately, when you have enormous populations of people that constantly require food and don't grow anything, you have to

come up with some way to feed those folks. And I'm a giant fan of regenerative farming, but I'm very skeptical that that could scale out to where you could just go to In-N-Out and get a double-double just like that from regenerative agriculture. I don't know. I don't mean maybe it can be done. There's a lot of land that's not utilized in this country. Maybe it can be done, what do I know? But what I do know is that factory farming is fucking disgusting. And when you have ag-gag laws where a person working there

who's horrified can't even alert the general public or they face consequence, legal consequences, you can go to fucking jail for telling people about something that's absolutely horrific that shouldn't be legal. Yeah, that's crazy. That's crazy. That's just a crazy thing.

And that's just as a byproduct of protecting corporations above our moral and ethical structure. And then the reality of needing food for all these people. And how do you mitigate that without upending the entire industry instantaneously? And how do you do that without upending the entire industry? Like instantaneously and how do you do that? How does it even scale out? How do you take, you know, we've had people on, Will Harris particularly from Whiteoaks

Pastures in Georgia where his family owned a industrialized farm and they used industrial fertilizers and all that jazz. It took him 20 years and who knows how many dollars to convert his farm to regenerative agriculture and the results been incredible. I mean just soil richness, the way they've been able to show that they can have these animals exist in what's basically confined nature. You just sort of manipulate nature and let them do what they would naturally do if they were all living together on the plains. And then that's how we're supposed to grow food.

And this is like the most ethical way, the healthiest way, the best way for the land. It's zero carbon footprint. It actually sequesters carbon this way. It's the way the earth is supposed to exist with all these animals. But we've sort of we've bastardized that. And I think you're right that in future generations, they're going to look upon that and go what the fuck were they thinking? They knew they had the internet. They knew they watched the videos. They saw it. They saw it. And they just like put the blinders on and kept buying cheeseburgers. Yeah. Yeah. It's interesting like the you

know, the shift to industrial agriculture, when you look at the social changes that resulted from it, it reminds me actually a lot of after Rome conquered Carthage and then the rest of the Mediterranean, you really became like the Roman Empire that we think of even though it was still a republic. You had this influx of just hordes and hordes and hordes of slaves that were coming from these conquered places back into Italy. And so you had before that, you had like a Roman Republic where each citizen was a soldier. He was like an independent farmer, small farmer, and he was a soldier and a citizen, and those were the Roman people. But all of a sudden, you get this huge influx of slaves, and the guys with the larger farms start building out industrial, building

out economies of scale. So now you have these massive plantations and they're putting the smaller people out of business, you know, because they don't care if, you know, if you're off to war, if that means you don't get a full crop this year and you can't pay for next year's crop. Well, there's no welfare program for that. You got to sell it to the guy or take a loan from a guy that then becomes a whole thing. And so all of these independent farmers that were scattered around the countryside got concentrated into a handful of gigantic

lot of fundia farms. And all of those people used to live in the countryside, they had to go into Rome, looking for work, looking for something to do. And that's how you got the Roman mob that led to the fall of the Republic and Caesar and all that. And if you think about it in our modern day, we had something similar happen, only it wasn't with an influx of slaves, it was the industrial revolution. All of a sudden, like, you know, just having a family farm that you could actually like run profitably and sustain yourself on

became extraordinarily difficult because prices of things went so far of all like agricultural commodities dropped so far down. I'm talking like 95 percent, you know, prices took a hit because all of a sudden you're, you know, you got combines and tractors and shit. So you're putting out so much more food that it becomes just not viable to be a small farmer like making his way back then. So all of the, it got, you know, consolidated into gigantic industrial farms and all the people who used to live in the countryside, which is most people back in the day, they all got herded into the cities to go work in the factories and on the docks and everything. And, you know, it's interesting because, you know, over here, that process was like sort of ad hoc and semi voluntary,

you know. I say that with qualification, you know, if you were a farmer who couldn't pay your debt and you were getting evicted, I mean, a sheriff would show up with his gun and be like, get out of here. So, I mean, there was a little bit of implied force there. But the same thing was happening, like, if you look at what Stalin was doing in the late 20s and the early 30s. Over there, they were far behind like the level of industrial development in Britain and the United States and Germany, and he wanted to change that. And so you had all these small farmers, these are the Kulaks, as people call them, that he targeted, small farmers who lived down the countryside and

had their communities, but he wanted these to be consolidated into efficient industrial farms, and he wanted all of those people to get in the cities and work in the factories. And so over there, they did by like brutal violence in a very accelerated period of time, like something that we did over a longer period of time that it was more or less voluntary. But at the end of the day, the social effects were the same. All of those people from the country had to move into the cities and work in industry. And that was, I mean, it was inevitable. I mean, if Russia would be speaking German right now, if they didn't industrialize and get into a place where they

could actually fend off that invasion. I mean, you had to do it just to compete, but, you know, it creates... I mean, if you think about like... I mean, just think about like the history of Europe, you know, in feudal Europe where the aristocracy, virtually all the wealth that anybody had was in land. Like, you were rich because you were an aristocrat who collected rents from the peasants on your land. That's where wealth came from. So wealth was like distributed throughout the countryside. A lot of times you'd have guys who, you know, a lord who, you know, he'd go to court sometimes or whatever, but his power base was out here in the countryside and they were all spread around. And as that started as the industrial revolution, like really kicked into gear, all these guys whose

wealth was derived from agriculture and the whole aristocracy, you had like by the time you get up to the mid to late 1800s, you've got guys who are lords like aristocrats who are completely penniless, like they have no money. They still walk around like strut around like aristocrats, but they don't have any money. Meanwhile, you have a guy who owns a bunch of newspapers in London or whatever who's super rich and a guy who owns a factory who's super rich. And it really changed the balance of power between the aristocracy and this commercial class that really didn't even exist a couple hundred years before, but now is ascendant and really asserting itself politically. And I mean, that right there is, and what we talked about earlier, as that's happening, you're also getting, the former peasants and former small farmers are coming into the cities and becoming

the new working class. And all three of these groups are getting politicized. And these are just, it's why the question of, Dan likes to talk about the debate between the great man theory of history and the trends in forces theory. Is it like just broad social forces and so forth that just, you could get rid of Hitler? It would have been a guy named Otto, you know, who would have started second. It was all just we're all pawns in the, you know, the grand scheme of history. Or does it take like, is it based on personality, like somebody who really moves the chains himself?

And it's always a little bit both. But that's something that will never be really fully resolved because, you know, there are times like that where I like take like the emergence of slavery in the New World. It's a perfect example, right? If you're a European country, and this is like when we started colonizing the New World, the Spanish and Portuguese started colonizing it at first. This is like right on the tail of them finishing up the Reconquista. So they had spent the last 700 years in a state of constant war because this is crazy to think about but Muslims actually controlled Spain and Portugal for a longer period of time

than Spanish and Portuguese people have controlled it since then, right? So like it was hundreds and hundreds and hundreds of years and they're at a constant state of war to push the Muslims back into North Africa. So you have a very like Spartan warlike people because it's how you had to be there. Whole society was geared toward like this conflict. It was centuries long.

And so you take those people and they're the first ones who show up in the new world, right? And so right there, you've got like a certain bias in like the relations between these Europeans and the people in the New World, right? So right there, you've got like a certain bias in like the relations between these Europeans and the people in the New World. Well, they come over there, and this is pretty soon, just like, you know, 1492, and then just a few decades later, the Protestant Reformation happens. So there's religious conflict and religious wars and things, you know, wars between different kingdoms now have a little bit higher stakes because you're

not just talking about, you know, they're going to take this piece of territory from us or something. It's like, no, they're going to change our religion. You know, really high stakes. And this is still at a time when, you know, Europe politically, like geopolitically, was an anarchic place. I mean, people were at war all the time and nobody even thought that war was immoral. You know, it was actually like part of the natural order of things.

If you are a stronger neighbor and your weaker neighbor has something, you should have it, you know? And there's nothing really like considered wrong about it, like in a moral sense, especially since back then, wars were generally fought between, you know, the aristocracy themselves, you know, the knights and people. It wasn't like they were rounding up peasants and sending them off as cannon fodder. And so given like the high stakes, once the Spanish and Portuguese came over to the New World and just started extracting so much wealth, you know, from there, almost immediately, you get Charles V who takes over a huge chunk

of Europe, you know, becomes the Roman Emperor, the first Holy Roman Emperor, and it's just becoming overwhelmingly powerful. And if you're any other country in Europe at that time, you're looking at it like, we got to get in on this new world thing or else we're going to get swallowed up. And so you start getting in on the new world thing. And what you find out really quickly is, oh, we don't have enough people actually to go over there and like do all the mining and all the agriculture and everything else. We're gonna have to find somebody else, another population to do that.

Well, you couldn't take any Europeans as slaves or anything because whoever the...you needed your own people here and the kingdom next door was not gonna let you do that, take their people. And so they started resorting to West African slavery, which was sort of served up to the Spanish and Portuguese because the Muslims in Spain and Portugal had been engaged in that for centuries. And so they had been sort of, you know, like the Spanish and Portuguese already knew the trade networks. They were very familiar with African slavery, you know, which had existed in Spain really since like the time of the

Roman Empire before. They had a constant history with slavery going all the way back. And so they get over there and they start using slaves to set up their colonies and extract the wealth from those colonies. And the interesting thing to me about it is that, you know, if you were a ruler who said, yeah, well, I don't think slavery is right, so I'm not going to do that, okay, then you will get swallowed up by somebody who has less scruples and is willing to do it. They're going to get richer and more powerful and they're going to take what you've got. And then guess what? There's slavery anyway. It's just that you're not, you know, around anymore. That's it. And the same like with the West African kingdoms and the rulers and warlords down there who were selling the

slaves to the Europeans. You could be a guy who's like, you know, I really don't think we should be selling our fellow Africans to these Europeans to be, you know, taken as slaves. That just seems wrong to me. Well, okay, that's fine. Your neighbor who is getting gold and guns from the Portuguese or whatever is going to conquer you and take you all as slaves and send you over. And so it almost becomes like a game theory problem where there's no overarching authority to tell all the people, hey, we're not doing this. And so each individual actor does it just really as a matter of like expedient survival at the time. And when you look at when slavery did, when the slave trade was put to a halt, it only happened after the British Empire became like the real dominant

power on the seas. And they were the ones, you know, they were the ones with the anti-slaverships who were going around putting a stop to the trade. And that never could have happened until there was like this big overarching authority who could actually make everybody else make this change that they didn't want to make, you know? It's a crazy history. It really is. And it's, again, it's so hard to put yourself in the perspective of those people that are living life back then, where you have completely different expectations, completely different

norms. And I think that's one of the reasons why your podcast is so valuable. So listen, man, thank you very much for being here. I really appreciate it. I'm sorry that all that stuff happened to you, but I think ultimately it just made more people aware of your show, which is excellent. So thank you very much. Appreciate you.

It's Martyr Made. It's available everywhere. Audio only. So yeah, I don't want to make people stare at my ugly mug for a seven hour episode. Thank you, Darrell. Bye everybody. audio only. Yeah, I don't want to make people stare at my ugly mug for a seven hour episode. Alright, thank you, Darrell. Bye, everybody.