The Joe Rogan Experience - #2334 - Kash Patel

Episode Date: June 6, 2025

Kash Patel is the Director of the FBI, appointed in February 2025. A former federal public defender, national security prosecutor, and senior official in both the Department of Justice and the Trump administration, he has held roles across the Intelligence Community, Department of Defense, and National Security Council.www.fbi.gov Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

The Joe Rogan Experience. Trained by day, Joe Rogan podcast by night, all day. All right. What's going on, man? How you doing, Joe? Very good to see you, sir. Thanks for having me in Austin. What is it like to be the head of the FBI?

How weird is that? It's completely f'ing wild. I mean, I don't even know how to describe it. What did you think it was going to be like and what was different once you got in there? I thought that we were going to be able to come in with the movement that President Trump came in with, the administration to fix the errors that the Trump came in with the administration to fix this, fix the errors that the leadership of the FBI previously made. Not like the 37,000 change people.

And we are. We're doing a ton of work. I didn't know we would be able to do it this quickly. Is my surprise. And what that showed me was the people at the Bureau, literally, people who have been there 30 year agents are coming up to me like, dude, we wanted to do that 15 years ago. Really? We wanted to do that 10 years ago. And then my question was like, you guys are the pros. Like, I'm just, my job is the

director. I'm not chasing down bad guys. I don't know how to do that is to give them what you need to get the hell out of the way. And they were like, dude, all they did was get in the way. So like, what what kind of stuff specifically did you start doing that they wanted to do 15 years ago? Simple, the one that I've taken the biggest heat for. When I said, hey, there are, these are the statistics from the USG.

So you can take them or leave them, right? I don't know where else to go because nobody else does these, right? In the last calendar year, not this one year before last, 100,000 people were dying of drug overdoses a year. That's one every seven minutes. A child or kid was being raped every six and a half minutes in this country and there were two homicides an hour in this country. And we have a 38,000-person workforce and I said, OK, where are the agents? Where are Intel analysts? Where is everybody? We got 55 field offices. We got 300 what we call RAs, resident

agencies. So satellite offices, the field offices in major cities. And they said, well, we've got 11,000 FBI employees in what we call the NCR, the National Capital Region. So if you take DC and you do a 50-mile, 60-mile radius around it, 11,000, almost a third of the workforce work there. And they said, what the hell are they doing there? They said, well, they mandated if you want a promotion, if you want to move up, you got to come back here and prioritize stuff here. So I said, look, we're moving agents and intel analysts to the field. And that's what I did. 1,500 people are going to the field because a third of the crime doesn't happen in Washington, D.C. in the 65 miles around it.

And everybody was like, we've been wanting to do this forever. I mean, just think about it. One agent out in Indian country, one agent out in Texas, Arkansas, Washington state prevents a homicide, conducts a major drug bust, stops a ton of fentanyl or meth

from coming into our country. One agent can do that. And the agents that I talk to now from around the country are just stoked. That's awesome. That's great news. That really is great news, because the fentanyl thing scares the shit out of me. It really does.

Well, it's one of the things I want to hammer down on, but whenever you want to get into that. Yeah, please. Yeah. It's so terrifying, because we've shown it on the podcast, the amount that'll kill you. Yeah. It's so small.

It's like the tip of a pencil. Yeah. It's like point something something milligrams. It's nothing. I'll give you, I put this to big programming. I love doing this long form stuff and this is the only long form interview I'm going to do. I hope you know.

I do one interview a month. One do one interview a month, one. And it's usually like a five minute TV thing just to keep abreast. And we do a lot of stuff on social media, but I've been looking forward to this for a long time. Even when I was on the campaign, I was just, this is like the best way to get information out.

So fentanyl, right? Everybody's like, how do you attack fentanyl? How do you stop this stuff? Okay, yes, let's go after the gangs, excuse me, the narco-terrorists down in Mexico. 100%, you gotta go after the cartels, the drug trafficking organizations. You gotta shore off the southern border.

The president has done an amazing job at both of those things, made it a priority. So we have decreased the amount of fentanyl being moved around, let's say, right? But not necessarily coming into the United States. So where's the root of the problem? The CCP. So the fentanyl precursors, the stuff you need

to make fentanyl comes from mainland China. That's it. Now, I'm sure like 1% of it comes from somewhere else in the world, but that's where it comes. They've got hundreds of companies standing up in mainland China shipping this stuff out into the world. Now their cover is that fentanyl has, and

it does have a legitimate lawful purpose in terms of an anesthetic or medical use for anesthesiology related stuff. Okay. So there's like a minimal use for it. And what the CCP has done is they've come out and said this is like the biggest like talk about The devil pulling the wool over the world's eyes. They're like we don't make fentanyl They're right. They don't they just give you all the ingredients for it and ship it to Mexico And then what they did was to trick the world. They came out and said hey We're gonna not sell precursor X.

They're like, so now we're out of the fentanyl trade entirely. The problem is, there's 14 other precursors you can use to make fentanyl and they're still shipping all of those. So what we did when I got to the bureaus, we stood up this massive enterprise to go after fentanyl precursor companies in mainland China. They're probably not going to like that. And what they're doing now to get cute is they're shipping that stuff not straight to here. They're going to places like India, and I'm also doing operations in India, and they're having the Mexican cartels now make this fentanyl down in Mexico still.

But instead of going right up the southern border and into America, you know what they're doing? They're flying it into Vancouver. They're taking the precursors up to Canada, manufacturing it up there, and doing their global distribution routes from up there because we were being so effective down south. Yeah, it's a huge lift, but part of it is Americans just don't understand the depth and depravity of fentanyl. But what's worse is fentanyl, you don't hear fentanyl deaths in China.

You don't hear fentanyl deaths in India. You don't really hear fentanyl deaths in England, Australia, New Zealand, or Five Eyes partners in Canada. The Chinese, in my opinion, the CCP have used it as a directed approach because we are their adversary, and they don't like us and we don't like what they're doing when it comes to fentanyl and Their long-term game is is this how do I in my opinion? kneecap the United States of America our largest adversary well, why don't we go and take out generations of Young men and women who might grow up to serve in the United States military or become a cop

or become a teacher. And that's what they're doing when you wipe out tens of thousands of Americans a year. It's a long-term plan for them. Whoa, that is such a dark, dark thing. It is, but we got, we got, we're on it. What else could be done done with the Chinese companies? Has there ever been any negotiation with Xi Jinping, with the United States, where you

could lighten up tariffs or do something and make some sort of a deal? Or is it just so profitable for them that they're going to do it no matter what if they can? Here's the thing. They're not making a ton of money off of it. Right. So it's really just for that purpose. You can sell fentanyl precursors and unless you jacked up the price to exorbitant amounts of money, they're not making a ton of money. And so it's an all of government approach. So I'm working with guys like the Secretary of Treasury to do sanctions on some of these

companies, right? Then I'm working with our Five Eyes partners and our Five Eyes are the five English-speaking countries in the world, you know, Canada, America, England, New Zealand and Australia, right? We share intelligence. We share classified intelligence on this stuff. So I'm asking them, I said, hey, it's not just affecting us. It will affect you and your population. The CCP just hasn't directed it at you yet, and they know that.

And I said, guys, I need your help. I'm looking at intelligence reporting that shows fentanyl precursors are now in your country. The fentanyl itself isn't being deployed into your country, but it's there being manufactured. And so I'm asking for their help to shut down those factories and production facilities, and I'm asking the Mexican government's help to come and say, hey, your drug trafficking organizations are now exporting the manufacturing of fentanyl and getting creative in the ways in which they obtain fentanyl precursors.

So they'll say, oh, we didn't get it from China. We got it from India. We got it from, you know, wherever. And it's too cute by half. It's not like there's been a reduction in the amount of fentanyl precursors that mainland China produces. What there has been a reduction in

is President Trump's administration's aggressive approach to just crush the fentanyl trafficking. And unfortunately, our adversaries adapt. We're so good down south on the border, here. And we're so good in Mexico that they're moving it elsewhere. Jesus. We're going to get them. I promise you.

I promise the president and the American people, we will not have kids dying of fentanyl overdoses in our streets. Just give me a little bit more time. We have a massive operation going on around the world on this. Well, that's great news. It's great to hear. So the fentanyl, a lot of it is, it's not just fentanyl overdoses, right? It's opiate overdoses overall. How much, is a lot of it

because people get hooked on pills and like, and then they want more and then they could buy black market pills and those are the ones that have fentanyl in it or is it Molly and things like that that have been laced with fentanyl So great question. Nobody asked these questions. It's probably why your show is number one They are so Demonic in their ways. They're like we'll make fentanyl and People can go use fentanyl and get killed on fentanyl Then what they do is they manufacture as part of this lift they being the drug trafficking organizations once they get the precursors on a CCP

They take their pill presses and they make fake oxycodone So like literally I'm just giving an example make tens of thousands of pills of fakes oxycodone and we bust them for it And in that fake pill is fentanyl. It's laced with fentanyl that kills people. Then the drug trafficking organizations to make it appealing for the youth shape this illicit narcotic in the form of like candy and gummy bears. So you hear about kids in New York who just happen to have like a trace amount touching it somewhere

also dying from it. So they have absolutely no rules or boundaries whatsoever when it comes to how they deploy fentanyl to get into our population. It could be through another drug, it could be through a synthetic, it could be through a fake drug, or it could be like, hey, and we've seized it. Thousands of pounds of material that looks like candy. Are they doing it specifically to try to get people to overdose on candy or are they selling this candy

as a drug? They're selling it as a drug. Okay, and they're just saying it looks like candy. It just looks appealing to kids, right? Like so inner city youth, they're like hey, put a pill down on the table, put a gummy bear down on the table, you know, a younger person's gonna be like oh oh that's cool. Let me try that. I mean I can tell you stories from now until the entire show about high school kids on the verge of

graduating and they went out and took a pill that they thought was, you know, an upper. But it happened to be laced with fentanyl. They died. Their parents are calling. They're destroyed. And people are like, well, we got to go after the drug traffickers. I'm like, we do and we are. But what my job is to educate the American public on the root cause of the fentanyl that is destroying our society and it's the fentanyl precursors. And I've asked, I literally just got off the phone with the Indian government.

I said, I need your help. This stuff's coming into your country and then they're moving it from your country because India is not consuming fentanyl. They're not. No one's dying over there from fentanyl. But I need you and your help. So my FBI is over there working with the heads of their government law enforcement authorities to say, we're going to find these companies that buy it and we're going to shut them

down. We're going to sanction them. We're going to arrest them where we can. We're going to indict them in America if we can. We're going to indict them companies that buy it and we're going to shut them down. We're going to sanction them. We're going to arrest them where we can. We're going to indict them in America if we can. We're going to indict them in India if we can. Start inditing in places like Canada and the UK and England and Australia. This is a global problem. And the reason it's gotten so bad is because nobody did anything for four years. People are like, how do they stand this up?

Well, if you give the CCP, who has an endless amount of money to deploy in human capital, that's what happens. It metastasizes. Why didn't anybody do anything for four years? Have you been able to figure that out? Look, to me, I'm a national security guy. And anything that kills 100,000 people a year is a national security crisis, right? It's what we call a tier one threat.

And the last administration did not classify the drug trafficking enterprise as a prime threat against the American people. And so what happens is you reorient the system of intelligence collection operations. I mean, I'm not making this up. They said climate change is our biggest priority. DEI is our biggest priority. I mean, you guys have heard this and you've guessed on that state. But these are the ramifications in real life.

I only have X amount of people that can target something, right? Same with the CIA, same with the DOD. But if the United States government and Uncle Sam and your commander in chief said, hey, I need your X amount of people looking here, I can't clone that army to look back at Fentanyl. Plus, we have to follow the chain of command It's so crazy that they would say climate change and DEI were the priorities for the FBI Well for the government for the government. Yeah, so I'll give you a better example So I was in the end of the last Trump administration of chief of staff of the Department of Defense one of the greatest jobs at

The time I thought the greatest job I'd ever have and Chief of Staff of the Department of Defense. One of the greatest jobs. At the time, I thought the greatest job I'd ever have. And when we left, we said, hey, you know, Iran's a huge threat. We got to never let up on the counterterrorism mission. We still have hostages out there we got to find and bring home. And the narcotics mission is a big priority. We handed off our playbook and we said, look, this is not a political issue. This is protecting the American people and our allies. So we hope you guys continue this effort. So the DOD has this thing called CONOPs, concept of operations.

The Department of Defense has three million employees and a CONOP is how you move the machine of the Department of Defense. Hey, we have a threat in DOPACOM. How many carrier groups are we sending down there? We got a threat with government X. What are we doing operationally, kinetically? What are we doing intelligence collection?

That's a con-op. The first concept of operation that the Biden administration launched at the Department of Defense was on climate change. You can't make this shit up. What do you think that's all about? Like as an outsider, as someone like looking at it going, I just don't understand, like where's the profit in this?

What's the motive? What would incentivize all these people to get on board with it without someone logically stepping in and saying, hey, this is not our top priority? I think that it's, so that was something I tried to answer when I was out of government for the last four years before I took this job and the answer laid in the first Trump term

We were doing things so effectively on national security that hadn't been done before in such speed and volume That the media hated us for it because the other party had tried to do it and failed. What things specifically? So when it comes to, okay, hostages, I could talk about that forever too. Used to be counter-terrorism was a big portfolio. I ran it for the White House and National Security Council

and the first Trump administration. We brought home, people don't know this, President Trump in his first term brought home and rescued over 50 hostage and detainees from around the world. That's more than every president before him combined. Wow. Did you hear about the successes of reuniting families with lost loved ones from Africa and the Middle East,

or these operations that the president was courageous enough to green light to go into places like Afghanistan and do these hostage rescue ops and use SEAL Team Six and Delta or take out guys like Baghdadi and Soleimani. President Trump's directive was simple. We are going to protect the homeland. We're not going to endanger the lives of our armed forces and our intelligence community.

But their job is to protect the homeland. And he said go. And we went. And I think there was such a resounding success But their job is to protect the homeland. And he said go, and we went. And I think there was such a resounding success that the media had such a hatred for President Trump and his administration. They just said, one, we're not gonna give you the credit.

Two, we're gonna put out a ton of disinformation, which we can get into. And three, when it came time to transition governments from Trump to Biden. They just said, we're not going to do, and this is my opinion, we're not going to do any of the stuff that worked because then we'll have to attribute it to Trump's policies. So we're going to go off on our end. And I keep asking people to prove me wrong.

Tell me something you did in that administration that carried out the apolitical national security mission to a T. Right, I mean you had the secretary of defense in the Biden administration go down, go to a hospital, MIA, literally AWOL, and didn't tell the commander in chief and broke the national command authority. There is a reason, and I was a guy responsible

in that nuclear football for part of my time at the White House That that thing and there is an unbroken chain of command between President United States the Secretary of Defense and the National Command authority at all times because shit happens and What if it had happened in that one or two weeks the guy was in the hospital and maybe something didn't we don't even know Right, but no one including the president didn't know the secretary of defense was in the hospital. I can't tell you how big of a cataclysmic failure for the national security mission that is.

And what I tell people when they're like, that's all right, it's not that big of a deal. What if Hexseth took a week out and said, I'm going to the hospital, I'm not telling anyone? What do you think the media would do to that guy and Trump if that were to happen now? Yeah, it would be catastrophic. Yeah. Yeah.

So this person went to the hospital for what? What was the... I keep losing my flame. Is it in the letter over there? I got it. Yeah. You got it. What was...

What were they in the hospital for? So Secretary Austin was in the hospital for medical issues, And I'm not saying you shouldn't have treatment. Right, but there should be someone else that's- There's a plan in place. The Deputy Secretary of Defense comes in, every time a senior goes out, there is a continuity of government plan in place. Oh, you're out for a weekend treatment, no problem.

But they just hid all this? They hid it. That's insane. And we broke it, we discovered it and we broke it. And it wasn't the only time he did it. It was the second time. Or the guy would end up doing it another time. Why would they do that?

Just to hide the fact that they're sick? Well, that I think is up for debate. People are old and they get sick. No big deal. Everybody needs treatment. Everybody's got to go to Walter Reed or whatever. But do you think that he thought it would hurt him politically if he looked weak? I'm not speculating.

Yeah, I don't know if I can answer that. And the secretary at the time, Secretary Lloyd Austin, was like a 45-year military man. It's not like this was new to him. He'd been doing it his whole life, next man up. So he had made a decision to try to keep it private. Intentionally. And he would come out later to say, well, I just wanted to keep it private. And I said, hey, man, your life when you're the Secretary of Defense, Director of the

FBI, Director of the CIA, it ain't about being private. That's gone. You signed up to serve the mission. And when you do that knowingly, you have literally violated the National Command Authority. Wow. So you were saying there's a bunch of misinformation that was put out or disinformation. Like what was that? So my thing is all roads lead to Russiagate, right?

That's where it all started. I was coming out of my tour at JSOC as a civilian and DOJ and I would end up going to Congress to run this thing called Russiagate, which at the time no one knew anything. It was just a whatever. And then it became what it became. And I would be the guy, the lead investigator on the Hill who said, hey man, look, they lied in the FISA application. Let me give you Russiagate in 90 seconds. Could you imagine a time in the United States of America in the 21st century where a political

party would go overseas and acquire fake foreign intelligence from a foreign intelligence officer funded by donations to that political party in the United States of America, then take that material, package it, walk it to the FBI literally, and say, hey, we need you to surveil the opponent of our political party who happens to be running for the president of the United States, then convince the FBI to go into a secret federal FISA court that I used to use to manhunt terrorists and say, hey, I need you to wiretap essentially all the comms in and around Trump camp because of the material we gave you and then have that FBI lie to the federal court and the judge in that warrant application, which is

a felony, and intentionally remove information of innocence from that application just to get it above the threshold so the judge would cite it. That's Russiagate. That's what they did. And you remember the years and years of reporting surrounding Russiagate. The FBI would never lie. They would never do that. The leadership there is above reproach. James Comey, Andy McCabe, Peter Strzok. The list goes on. We caught him red-handed. We caught him. You've seen the text messages. You've seen the documentation. You've seen the reports. But when I did that, when I exposed that initially as a staffer on the Hill, Adam Schiff comes out and has his cronies leaked to the world that I am acting as a genocidal dictator.

There was actually an article that called me- Genocidal dictator. Hang on, it gets better. Yeah, no, it gets better. How do you get to be a dictator? I don't know. Genocidal one, let alone, right? Like, you know, it's a twofer.

His words don't even mean anything anymore. No, literally there's an article out there that they called me Torquemada, the guy from the Spanish Inquisition. Jesus Christ. And I was a staffer. So the rule was you can ding elected representatives all you want in the media. You don't touch staffers. They didn't care because they knew what I had on earth was the biggest political criminal

scheme ever perpetrated by portions of the FBI leadership and other people in the intelligence community. In coordination with the media. In coordination. Who could have investigated it? But hang on, that's the kicker. So what people don't know about Russiagate that weren't paying attention was that warrant that initially kicked off the FISA surveillance on the Trump campaign writ large was substantiated

by FBI leaks to the media. Two of the articles cited in that warrant from, I think, Mother Jones and Yahoo News were leaks of information from the same leadership at the FBI, Peter Strzok, Andy McCabe, James Comey and company. And then they in the application would be like, hey, it's not just us saying that Trump's a Russian asset, right? Look at this article, Mr. Judge, on the federal FISA court. And they included it in that application.

So this was a coordinated conspiracy to take down your political opponent by weaponizing government. And now I say that now in 2025, when I said that in 2017, whatever it was, people were like, you're out of your effing mind. And I was like, look, man, I'm just showing you the facts. I'm not making this up.

I'm showing you the application. I'm showing you the documentation. And that's when they came after me. And it hasn't stopped ever since. But the damage they did, they, the media, and the people that wanted to take out Trump, and I didn't care what you thought about. And remember, back then, I hadn't met Trump, never spoken to him, didn't know him. I took that job at Congress on one condition.

I said, whatever we find, we're putting out. I'd been in for 16 years at that point, Democrats, Republicans, I was a national security guy, intel guy, that's what I wanted to do. Chase terrorists, chase bad guys, bring hostages home and help protect the homeland. And I said, I don't know if Trump did this. I don't know if he was colluding with whoever. I didn't know it turned out like this, that they would actually manufacture

and make it up. But half of America to this day still believes the narrative that the CNNs of the world pushed for five years. And if you look on their shows now, Russiagate keeps coming back up, because we keep exposing the documents that showed how bad these guys were. And most Americans like, no, no, they're already convinced. So in order to fix that disease temple, it is just that much harder of a lift for me to go back into the FBI. We're going to get it done. But it takes so much more communication

and so much more energy to get after the American people and say you were lied to. Because that's the hardest thing I think people can ever admit to themselves. You were lied to. I went out for years and created a life cycle out of this lie of Russiagate. I went on TV, I made money, I wrote books, I sold political advertisements based on it.

I educated my children based on it because I thought it was the truth. And some of them have come back and said, yeah, we got it wrong. But most haven't. And that's the disinformation seed, in my opinion, that started it all. And then you could talk about things like January 6th or, you know, pick your poison, rescuing hostage or what have you. The media just never got on board.

They kneecap Trump from the beginning by participating in the Russiagate collusion conspiracy with the FBI. It's so crazy that someone could do something like that and a whole enormous group of people could do something like that with no repercussions. And to be able to operate and say they're the trusted source in news and you were a part of something that was one of the biggest scandals in political history. But just because it's targeted towards Trump, people look the other way. Like, if that was targeted towards Obama, could you imagine how psychotic the response

would be? People would be up in arms and furious. But the same people that would be up in arms and furious of someone who try to do that for Obama Are completely silent if it's happening to Trump. Yeah, just think about it What if me as the FBI director in the Trump administration, right during a presidential cycle went out there and said hey Republican National Committee Do you guys have dirt on? Whoever's running for the Democratic nomination to be president of the United States?

If you don't can you go overseas and pay a foreign national who used to be an MSX guy? Get me some bogus intel then I as the FBI director will authorize a warrant a leak to the media while I'm doing it Take their articles put it in that warrant and then go surveil the opponent so he doesn't get elected. I would be in prison Which I should be for doing anything like that. And that's what people want accountability for. And that's what you asked me at the beginning of the show, you know, what's the hardest part?

I'm like, hey, I'm the guy that is exposing and giving you the accountability from 2017 onwards. But I wasn't the guy in charge of putting people in prison and arresting them for this conduct. And so the other Education campaign I have to go on is there's this thing called a statute of limitations I can't prosecute people for their crimes in the past as a statute of limitations has run and I'll give you a great example That goes back right back to Russiagate so one of the big

Systems I've created, maybe because of my time in Russiagate, is I'm committed to congressional oversight. I'm committed to giving Congress the documents they need to do their work and give them to the American people. Unredacted, no classification BS, you want it, you get it. So we, just think about this, Me as the director of the FBI, the former Russiagate guy, when I first got to the Bureau, found a room that Comey and others hid from the world in the Hoover building full of documents and computer hard drives

that no one had ever seen or heard of. Locked the key and hit access and just said, no one's ever gonna find this place. What? Yeah, so my guys are going through that right now. What's in there? A lot of stuff. I mean, that's the thing. People are like, well, okay, go arrest him.

And I'm like, okay, well, how about you let me run a methodical investigation while I give over information. One of the things we gave over before this, the room deal was, I don't know if you remember who Nellie Orr is, it doesn't really matter. Nellie Orr's husband, Bruce Orr, was like the number four at the Department of Justice, and he was the one who introduced the world to Christopher Steele, the guy that started Russiagate.

Well, the entire time her husband was doing that at DOJ, she, Nellie Orr, was working on an outside contract to dig up dirt on Donald Trump. So she goes to the Hill and testifies as a result of our investigation right under oath. She said, I never worked, and I'm paraphrasing, I never worked with my husband on any of that. I would never do that. What did Grassley put out just yesterday, two days ago? The Nellie Orr documentation that the FBI hid to the world that we gave them, where Nellior is caught red-handed providing information

to her husband, thumb drives related to Trump-Russia collusion, directly proving that Nellior lied to Congress. Felony. Can't prosecute her. Statute of limitations is gone. That's just one example. Wow. What a dirty business. Yeah, I hate it.

Politics is just, it is just the dirtiest. And in this age of transparency because of, you know, the internet and social media and independent news, like everybody knows about it now. Like if this, if CNN and, you know, and all these left wing news sources, MSNBC, and it was only Fox on the right, and that was all we had, and we had no internet. All this would be completely secret. No one would have known the Russiagate collusion, that all that stuff would be, people would really think it's a true story. It would probably take decades before someone wrote a book where people started to really

take it seriously and really realize that there was something fucked up about it. Yeah. I'm not allowed to plug my book, so I won't, but I did write a book about it. You can plug your book. Why can't you plug your book? I think there's some rules on it about government. I can plug your book. What's your book?

Give it to me. Here you go. This one's for you anyway, Government Gangsters. Oh, Government Gangsters by Cash Patel. Go buy it. Plugged. You didn't plug it. I did. I love it.

Did you do the audio? Yeah. You read it? Oh, I got somebody to do it. My voice is not for radio or TV. Come on, man. You got a great voice. I appreciate that. It's it's taken time and a lot of cigars to get to hear.

It would be good for you to read it. They should let you read it. Well, I mean, what's in there. But the reason I wrote it is one, I never thought I was going back in a government service and to part of the job to completing the mission was exposing what people didn't ever think could happen in the United States of America. And it was not just disinformation, misinformation, but your government and leaders in government weaponizing it for political purposes, not just FBI and DO misinformation, but your government and leaders in government weaponizing it

for political purposes, not just FBI and DOJ, but others in the IC. And what it shows you is the back end of that too, the rewards, right? The guys that wrapping it back up, or reversing it back up, the guys that were in charge of Russiagate at the FBI, Andy McCabe, right?

Remember what this guy did. Andy McCabe agreed to set in motion a plan with the Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein at the time to have him wear a wire into the Oval Office to record President Trump. Those documents we found, we released them. Put that aside. While Andy McCabe was in charge of the Trump Russia gate collusion investigation, his wife was running for political office in the state of Virginia. Do you know who's funding her campaign for political office?

Two to six hundred thousand dollars. Hillary Clinton World, who happened to be running against Donald Trump. Do you know what Andy McCabe did? He leaked information about the Clinton investigation to the media, unlawfully, as the deputy director of the FBI. Got caught by us, then lied about it to federal authorities. And that's the reason Andy McCabe was dismissed. Do you know what the Biden administration did? They allowed him to retire out of the FBI with full benefits. Wow.

He got rewarded. Do you know what he does now? He's on CNN. You know who's also on CNN? Peter Strzok, the head of the counterintelligence unit that had that affair with Lisa Page, who basically put out those text messages, who was running that investigation with Andy McKay

and said, Trump people smell in Walmart and we're never gonna let them win, I have an insurance policy, that guy's on CNN. So they get rewarded for putting on this disinformation campaign, for this illegal activity, because the media will never correct, or some portion of the media will never correct the record. Remember, these guys got Pulitzer's New York Times same thing

These guys got the biggest award in journalism. They were proven wrong not by me By the own evidence created by you know how I caught these guys because these guys were so arrogant They would write everything down and I found the documents Why would they write everything down? They're so arrogant. They think no one's going to catch us. I'm going to write everything down. We're going to put it in a lockbox. We're going to put it in a vault and no one's going to find it. Well you know what?

I found the vault and now I'm going to work. Wow. Now is there a statute of limitations on those crimes? So generally the statute of limitations on crimes for process crimes that we call them is five years. But if you can time to an overarching conspiracy, there is no statute of limitations. So if there was more egregious conduct that no one knew about before, that we are just finding and we are investigating,

then we'll have to relook at it. The one thing we will do is put out all that information to the American public once we actually get through it. And we'll give it to Congress. And if we can work with our partners at DOJ to come up with a prosecution, that'll be their decision. We'll do it. Soterios Johnson 7-12-19 The disturbing thing about all this to me is how people on the left are willing to look the other way. Because this is just a dangerous precedent.

If the federal government is doing this this and they're doing this to someone you consider an enemy what's to stop this from doing that against your candidate like this is unprecedented behavior that's tolerated and coordinated with the media like that's dangerous for the country it's day but people are so ideologically captured they're so They're so locked into their party and by any means necessary, we gotta get Trump out, and they push that narrative so hard that they're willing to do a very un-American thing.

Yeah. And my goal, now that I'm back in government, is to make sure this doesn't happen again ever. That's the goal. How can you do that? How can you make sure it doesn't happen again ever? Exposing it all. And I know there are people, and look, people keep calling me and saying, when are you gonna arrest everyone? When are you gonna go out there and arrest everybody that did everything to Donald Trump? I was like, first of all, you guys were barking at people who were in the seat before me to do that and they didn't, they failed. The difference between me and that guy is,

one, I'm the guy that exposed it, two, I didn't tell you this, I was the guy they targeted. So while I was doing the Russiagate investigation, do you know what Trump's own DOJ, Rod Rosenstein, the Deputy Attorney General of the Department of Justice, Christopher Wray, then Director of the FBI, did to me and a dozen other staffers who were working Russiagate.

They subpoenaed all of our information while I was running the Russiagate investigation. We wouldn't find out for five years. You want to know why? Because these guys were so vindictive, they went to the federal court and not only got a search warrant, they got a judge to say to all the telecom companies, Google, Facebook, everybody else, your banking companies, everybody, do not tell them for five years that we authorize this subpoena. So I just found that out last year. Wow.

This is how hard, this is what I'm trying to show. It's not a Republican or Democratic thing, right? It's an all hands on approach to protect the leadership that was so corrupt, to protect themselves and their actions and their friends. My mission is to educate the world that this happened. And as director of the FBI responsibility, I'm not just going to bring a case because somebody hurt me. They did.

And they continue to do it. Shit, my house just got swatted yesterday. What? Yeah. But you got swatted. Shit, my house just got swatted yesterday. What? Yeah. But. You got swatted? Oh, yeah. The head of the FBI gets swatted? Yeah.

Yeah. These people play. It's the ultimate height of hypocrisy. They have two sets of rules, one against you and one for them. And what I want to do is lay out that entire body of work for the American people with Congress. And I'm doing it with guys like Grassley and Jordan and Kennedy and Rand Paul on COVID-19. And we could talk about the origins. We actually have some pretty cool developments on that front. And let the American people know that my mission

has always been to put out the truth, whatever the consequences are, whoever it's against, like I did when I signed up for Russiagate. If Donald Trump was a Russian asset and I proved it, I was telling the world that. That's what matters. And if we can hold people accountable in terms of indictments, then we'll work with our partners at DOJ. But what I'm asking people is don't trust me.

I don't care about that. Look at what I have done and what we have done. That's the guy that's now in charge of the FBI. His leadership team is in place. We've got great partners at DOJ. We're the ones working on all this stuff. And look, let's just get to it because I know it's on people's minds.

Epstein, right? The reason people are pissed off about that is the same same thing right 20 years ago or whenever was 2006-7-8 Epstein gets his sweetheart plea deal right after committing the most horrific crimes on planet earth, right? I Wasn't I wasn't in power there. I wasn't in place there. I you know nothing to do with it But people were rightfully pissed. I mean this guy was committing the most grotesque acts you can against children and The media spins up about it many in the media protected him Why because of his relationships who he knew who his bankers were?

Who his colleagues were who was on the island and stuff like that some pretty powerful human beings And so when you peel back the the layer and then you and then what happened the Trump administration the last go-round decided no No, we're not gonna let that go. We're gonna investigate him, right? They charge him they indict him and he's awaiting trial and I've said it Dan Bongino said we've reviewed all the information and the American public is going to get as much as we can release. He killed himself. Do you think, let's play out the logical conclusion of this, do you think that myself, Bongino, and others would participate in hiding information about Epstein's grow test activities or do

you think we would also participate in not prosecuting people we had evidence to prosecute people on? The problem is there's been like 15 years of people coming in and creating fictions about this that doesn't exist. Where's the videotape of a Nipstein Island of X, Y, and Z committing these frauds? Why haven't you given it to us? Do you really think I wouldn't give that to you if it existed? I'm working my ass off along with the leadership at the Bureau and DOJ

to get you what we're allowed to give you. And you're going to get the video of the cell and you're going to see for yourself. And we will never be able to convince everyone. OK, let's let's get into that. So what did you think before you got in office? Did you think that Epstein was murdered? No.

No suspicion at all of it? But I have a different background, right? So I was a public defender back in the day. I used to spend a lot of time in jails and a lot of time in segregated housing units, shoes, as we call them. And so I've known people that have committed suicide in these cells. And I know how you get in, how you get out, who works the system.

And so the way, based on public information at the time that he ended up putting the pictures and him hanging himself, I was like, man, that guy killed himself. There's just no way that you could have run an op and had people go into that cell and not have any video of it and not have any people come out and say, hey, yeah, I saw that guy. He shouldn't have been there, the guard or this guy. There's just no access points into places like this in the detention center he was in, which I've been in.

So, correct me if I'm wrong, but what I was told, what I'd read, was that the guards were not paying attention or were sleeping. Well, yeah, and in short order, you'll see it. Is that correct? Well, it's hard to surmise that from a video, right? Right. Where they like, you know, and look, do guards doze off on the night shift? Yeah. But no one can get in to the cell. And if they had gotten in to the cell, you would see it.

But we were told that the cameras were down. Well, I don't know who said that. But that was in the news. We're giving you all the footage we have. So why wasn't that released like immediately? Why did this speculation escalate? I think you'd have to ask whoever the attorney general back then was, Bill Barr. Did you ever see, do you remember that HBO autopsy show?

Dr. Michael Baden, he's a famous forensic scientist. So he's a pathologist and he reviewed the case. And it was his determination that it was a homicide because of the way his neck was broken. And what he said was it was indicative of a ligature strangulation, and it was because of the positioning on the neck where the marks were that it wasn't indicative of someone hanging by their weight,

which had been higher on the chin, and there was a specific break of the bones and the vertebrae that's consistent with someone who is just strangled to death. I haven't seen it. I'll definitely take a look at it, because that's part of my job. You haven't seen that? The report on that? No, I haven't looked at that.

Did you see any... Was there any other autopsy done other than the official one? Not to my knowledge, but if there was, you'll get it. And that's what we're doing. See, if you find that Dr. Michael Baden thing. Do you remember that show? The HBO show? No.

Pretty cool show. So this guy, Dr. Michael Baden, he had a long career of catching murders, you know, zooming bodies, finding trace amounts of poisons, different kinds of things. It was a crazy show, like all these wild ways. Well, I love watching shows and I spent a lot of time on planes. Yeah, it was an old show. It was a show from the early 2000s, I believe. But this guy was a very well-respected forensic

scientist who would analyze these bodies. And it was his determination that he was murdered. Yeah. And my job, going back to the core of what I've been doing since I started Russiagate, was to get and is to get everybody the information. When did you get here, Epstein's autopsy points to homicide, pathologists hired by brother claims. New York City medical examiner strongly disputed the claim that the evidence from the autopsy

suggests his strangulation. So let's go to the, by the way, this is the New York Times and they never lie. The private pathologist, Dr. Michael Baden said the morning TV show, Fox and Friends, Mr. Epstein experienced a number of injuries among them, a broken bone in his neck that are extremely unusual in suicidal hangings and could occur much more commonly in homicidal strangulation. I think the evidence points to homicide rather than suicides of Dr. Baden who observed the autopsy done by city officials. Dr. Baden, a former New York

City medical examiner and a Fox News contributor said, I have not seen in 50 years where that occurred in suicidal hanging case. Findings by Dr. Baden were strongly disputed by the city's chief medical examiner, Dr. Barbara Sampson, who previously ruled that Mr. Epstein's death on August 10th in the Metropolitan Correctional Center was a suicide. I stand firmly behind our determination of the cause and manner of death in this case. Dr. Sampson said in the interview on Wednesday, she added, in general, fractures of the hyoid, bone, and cartilage can be seen in suicides and homicides. The hyoid bone is near the Adam's apple.

Dr. Sampson also dismissed Dr. Batten's contention that the circumstances around Mr. Epstein's death suggested other people may have been involved. She said her office had done a complete investigation, taken into consideration information gathered by law enforcement in making the determination. So this is a perfect example of going back to my public defender and prosecutor days. This is what we call a war of experts. You can always find someone to come in and say the opposite. And I used to do it all the time. I mean, I represented some of the worst humans that you can possibly imagine on earth, literally, the guys that were trafficking children from Mexico into America.

And you could put up a professional expert to say, and this is what's gonna go on forever, and my job is not the forever. My job is to get you absolutely everything that we can give you, and that's what we're gonna do. When did you become aware of this video that showed that no one had gone in and out of the cell? Recently. So why was it recent though? I mean if this death was... how long ago was this death? Two years?

Couple? 2019? 2019. Oh, really? Why time flies. So six years. Well again, that's part of what I'm gonna try to answer for you. Jeffrey Epstein, JL jail CCTV erased by technical errors whoopsies But you see how anybody on the outs I mean this is like a perfect storm

Yeah for something can you pull that article up so we've read what it says Jamie US prosecutor said the jail mistakenly saved footage from the wrong cell. Sorry Epstein a convicted sex offender first tried to kill himself in July last year and hanged himself in jail hang on hang on yep reread that line that he first tried to kill himself in July of last year yeah how much the American public do you think knows that I didn't know that until right now there you maybe I heard it and forgot did you ever hear Jamie that's why he's on suicide watch I think oh Okay, so a guy himself in jail in August while serving trial on federal sex trafficking charge

He pleaded not guilty to abusing dozens of girls some as young as 14 Soon after Epstein's death in August to the ccc a CCTV cameras outside his cell of malfunction and were being examined by the FBI Found semi-conscious in his prison cell with injuries on his neck on 25th of July after this incident he's placed on suicide watch. I'm not saying every single camera in the place was working. I'm saying we've got footage and you're getting it. And then you can make up your own mind. And the theories can continue, but my job is to give you the image.

So you became aware of this footage recently the ones that we're looking at Yeah, right Yeah And so but this is like an article from quite a while ago that was saying that the footage was mistakenly erased Look, I mean goes back to the same Ask the people that were in power then I mean I get it that you want to hold me to account for their actions And no, I'm not you not you that not you, not you, just the public in general and that's okay.

What's confusing to everybody today, first of all, it's very confusing because AI can kind of make anything, which has got to be a bizarre position for you to be in. When you're looking at videos, I mean, I've watched Viking videos, it looked real as fuck, you know? They just make Viking towns. I mean, it's really quite incredible what they're doing now. And it accelerates every month. I mean, I talked to Elon about it and he said, we're blown away literally every

week. Every week there's some new breakthrough. We're like, wow, we didn't expect that. Well, I can tell you after having looked at it, this ain't going to be AI. You don't think so? You're going to. It's just not great. You know, it's like if it were AI, like someone wanted to come in and make it, they'd make it better. But why would you make it better when people could,

you know, you could have ambiguous footage that is, you know, totally generated by AI. I mean, AI can generate blurry images, AI can generate night vision, AI can generate essentially anything that's already existed, like really shitty 1984 VHS tapes, they can do that. They can. But I'm telling you, I'm giving you the tape from the tape. You know, there's, just like I'm giving you the documents from the vault, just like I'm giving you information to Congress on

COVID origins or what have you, what we find is what you're getting. Okay, so now it's saying 2019, missing jail video from the first Jeffrey Epstein So it's hope for the first attempt has been found so Maybe let's put it into perspective Jails are not the most efficient best-run places. It's not like Fort Knox yeah, no it's not it's yeah You know we're working with what we got. Right.

So, and listen, this guy's not the only guy to kill himself in prison. It happens, I don't know how often. Right. All the time. Even if he killed himself in prison. So, if he was murdered in prison, crazy, right? Yeah. You could see why very powerful people wouldn't want him talking.

If he was murdered in segregated housing in isolation after being on suicide watch in a place in a detention center that I've physically been in myself, it would be fiction. It's just in my experience, that is not doable. It's not doable even for the most powerful and wealthiest people in the world? Yeah. powerful and wealthiest people in the world. Wouldn't you think though that if someone was in a position where a guy could release information that could potentially damage the most wealthy people on earth, you would have a concerted effort that's unprecedented. You would have the resources that we couldn't even possibly comprehend all pointing towards eliminating this one person

that it could be done. But I mean, so many people have been implicated, right, already. And some of that information, what they did to Prince Andrew and everybody else is already out there. And so that's the conspiracy stuff that me, and Bongino, and the folks have to say, look, we will give you everything we can, and then we will have done our job.

Also, if I had a shred, me, Cash Patel, had a shred of evidence, the Russiagate guy, the Jan Six guy, the COVID origins guy, had a shred of evidence that this guy was murdered, I would be the first guy to bring this case hard and fast. And I would do even doing press conferences every week on it.

The first guy. That's what I'm asking people to play out to their logical conclusion. I'm not Comey, I'm not McCabe, I'm not the guy that was in the seat before. I have a wildly different background. I've been putting out the truth my entire career. Why would I risk all of it on this guy?

I believe, you can pass the letter. I believe I believe I just think that you know the problem is we've been Fuming on this conspiracy for so long and it we love conspiracies. Don't we know as a country? It's so much. I mean, you know, they make a tapes. Come on like release the documents. We all love them We love him. We love UFO ones. We love everything. We love the craziest conspiracies. They're exciting. We don't want to hear that he tried to kill himself in July and then succeeded in August. And look, I could imagine why the guy wanted to kill himself. He was going to jail for the rest of his fucking life. And in jail, sex offenders for children are not treated well. And also, by the way, most Americans have it,

nor should they. Have you ever spent one minute in segregated housing? No. It's the worst, the absolute worst. Like, you and your background, you could probably handle it, right? Like, you know, just in all reality, most Americans, you put them in there for five seconds,

they're gonna slam their head against the wall. Literally, they're gonna lose their mind. Yeah. Immediately. Yeah're gonna lose their mind. Immediately. It's that bad. I'm sure. I can only imagine. And I can only imagine this guy knowing that it's over.

And what do you want to do? Do you want to... Yeah, and then... And who knows who the fuck he's working for? Let's just put that aside. Now if you're working for... Let's just... We don't have to name names.

We don't have to speculate if he's working for some Agency some group some foreign group and they decide to target his family Because he look he's going to jail for the rest of his life Anyway, they decide to target his family if he testifies against them. I could see where I if I thought that it was like I'm gonna be in jail for the rest of my life or I tell and my family winds up being killed or destroyed or who knows? Maybe you'd say, look, the honorable thing is to end it in prison.

Honorable, cowardly thing. Cowardly, whatever it is. Like you just decide. At some point that guy was going back into gen pop. And the one thing I'll tell you about prison systems is the people they eat are child predators. Yes. And he was going to get eaten. Well known.

Yeah. And they probably wouldn't have protected him. Yeah. So, the narrative has always been that there's video. Now, what is the chain of custody? Is there evidence that there is video? Is there evidence that it was moved around, stored, protected from people looking at it? You're going to get all that information. That's literally what we're putting together.

And we're going to give you every single thing we have and can. And that's the whole point. We can't fill gaps by making stuff up and we're not gonna do that. And you have to be methodical. And we have to be but that's the other thing right? We're reviewing not just the video we're reviewing everything as meticulously as we can because that's what we owe the American people. That's our job and I don't want to rush to the sticks or the podium and just say, hey, look what we found. And then be like, oh, sorry, I forgot the four seconds.

You know, if we missed four seconds, they'll be like, oh, well, it's in the four seconds you missed. So I'm, I'm- How much can you talk about what you've seen? Not yet. Just, just what I've told you. Can you say you've seen anything?

No, that's the point that there's Nothing in there like in the video you guys are me bored you talking about the video of the murder or the But what about the video from the island? Oh, that's it. Sorry. So you're talking about to do it. Yes. So sorry. So yeah, so Again, we're gonna give you Everything we can and people have to remember we're gonna give you everything we can and people have to remember, we're not gonna re-victimize women. We're not gonna put that shit back out there.

It's not happening, cause then he wins, not doing it. You wanna hate me for it, fine. Again, logical play out. If there was a video of some guy or gal committing felonies on an island and I'm in charge, don't you think you'd see it? If you have access to it. If I have it, period.

If I have it, if I have it. So. Where else would it be? Right, if you have it. Right. But you can't say that you have it. No, we're giving you everything we have. So far. Everything we have so far, but you can't say that you have it No, we're giving you everything we have so far Everything we have so far is have you guys gone over all the video that's available? Yeah, that's what I'm telling you

That's what takes so much damn time. All right, and and is there video from the island? not of what you want the the people out there have out of what you want. The people out there have filled the void with can't wait to see X, Y, or Z. Right, speculation. And I'm like, here's the other thing I've been asking for, right? Openly. If you have information on this, call us. Tell us. The best resource we have is the American people in the world. Right.

Get me the tail numbers. Get me the flight. You know, get me new information and I will run that down. So this narrative might not be accurate that there's video of these guys doing this. Exactly. Is it possible that the video was taken and destroyed? Well, you're talking about what decades worth of stuff, right? Remember we have what we have pursuant to lawful search warrants and authorities from the case that was done however many years ago it was done. That's what we have.

If other people have other stuff and they want to give it to us, bring it. Have you guys reviewed everything that you have? Almost. I mean, yes, we have and now we're figuring out how to put it out. Right. Now, I understand that you would never revictimize these women and show this footage, but is there footage? Outside of... The only thing I can say right now is, if there was ever, if there was footage of anyone doing

anything else we would have opened a case. Is it possible that there was footage that you just will never have access to because they've already gotten rid of it? I mean anything's possible. There was a long time right between the time when it was clear that Kamala lost the election and that Trump won. Yeah I mean I got to hear it. Before he got into office. I got here 100 days ago, literally. Right, exactly. It's just kind of crazy. So I'm doing what I can.

And that's this type of stuff, and I'm happy to talk about it and bring it up. But what I'm trying to achieve at the Bureau is not only are we doing what's of public interest, what's of great public interest. Our biggest job, our biggest job is to defend the homeland and stop kids from dying. That's my, well, that's my biggest job. And that's what I'm focused on.

And I think we can do all of those things, and we're doing them really well. And I think if you give us just like another 100 days, it's not a lot of time. Literally, I just hit my 100 day mark like two days ago. You're gonna see a ton of stuff. Literally I just hit my 100-day mark like two days ago. You're going to see a ton of stuff. You're already seeing it. We just rolled out the Catholic memo, the truth about that.

What is that? The last administration, the FBI wrote a memo targeting Catholics. Remember the Richmond Catholic memo? I don't remember. Okay. So basically they there was a Write-up from the FBI relying on the Southern Poverty Law Center, which is like the modern-day fusion GPS and basically said Catholics should be targeted as domestic terrorists. Yeah, so then Chris Ray the former FBI, went to Capitol Hill and testified about it. And the Congress was like, wait a second, is this real? Is it predicated on actual fact? And how wide is it? Is it one office? Is it all these people across the country?

Are Catholics being targeted as domestic terrorists? And what ended up happening was Wray said, oh, it's just one office, one memo, nothing to see here. And what ended up happening was Ray said, oh, it's just one office, one memo, nothing to see here. Well, what we just roll out again to Congress this week to Chuck Grassley, who put it out, was that in fact, it was multiple offices, multiple memos that were weaponizing law enforcement to target a religious group during an election cycle. And we proved it. And now everybody has read it. Why were they targeting the Catholics? I don't know.

You'd have to ask the people that got here before I did. Did you have any suspicion of what kind of motivation they would have to do that? I think when you use, it goes back to Russiagate, if you're willing to use Mickey Mouse journalism, if you're willing to use the fusion GPS and Christopher Steeles of the world like the leadership at the FBI then did, then it has a chance to replicate itself. And that's what happened. I don't know if you know anything about the Southern Poverty Law Center, but they literally are the ones that sent information to the FBI and the FBI said, oh, we'll write a memo.

And so that's the type of work that I think gives credibility back to the Bureau, us exposing it, us giving Congress the truth, Congress coming back in and saying, hey, you actually didn't give us the Heisman. You gave us the documents. We gave them to the American people. And if there are criminal referrals to come out of that, then let's do that. I mean, we just had a great breakthrough this week on Fauci. So Senator Rand Paul, Senator Kennedy, and I hate to name names because I always forget people are doing a great job with us on COVID origins.

And we've got multiple investigations open on that. But they had always been looking for Fauci's original phone and, or not original, but phones and devices he used while he was Fauci back in Trump on during COVID. And nobody had found it till two days ago. Really? Yeah. Now look, your audience and everybody listening to it shouldn't jump to the conclusion. Everything's in there. We'll look at it. We'll pull it. We'll rip it as we say. And maybe it's deleted. Maybe it's not. But at least we found it, and at least now we can tell the American people we've been

looking because it is of public importance to figure out, did that guy lie? Did he intentionally mislead the world and cause countless deaths? We owe those answers to the American people. And the best evidence ever is always the people's evidence who created it. And so now we're going to go and exploit those hard drives. But I think a victory for the American people that we broke with Congress is that we did find it. We're not done, we're still looking, and we're on the case.

So whether it's Richmond Catholic memo, whether it's Fauci COVID origins, whatever becomes of Russia gay crossfire hurricane, whatever becomes of great public importance, that's a big part of what we do at the FBI too. The crossfire hurricane one is bananas. Well, that's all Russia. Yeah It's completely nuts. I mean you can we can do three days on that. I mean, I'm that's like I spent it's bananas I mean, it's I mean, there's so many things in the past that you get it like like the Operation fast and furiousious. Yeah, the guns.

Insane, which led to the death of American lives. Of a federal agent. Yeah. Yeah. You know, and there's just things that, like, I see that you would think I would have more uproar, even as much time I've been doing this, that don't, and things that wouldn't have, that in my mind

would be like, no one's going to pay attention, and people are like, oh my god. And so that's part of the learning curve for me, too. You know, like trying to figure out what the balance is, you know, should I be given this so much attention, so much resources? But then when I have to call a parent because their kid's dead from fentanyl or when I have to call a cop's family and I call every single line of duty death that we have in this country.

I call everyone's chief and I call their families. And I'm glad that the numbers are going down in terms of how many have been killed this year versus last year. How much of the numbers gone down? By over 15% so far. But I want to be at zero. You know, that's where my focus needs to be. 15% in 100 days. Yeah. Still, you know, pretty good. Give or take a couple of points. And that's where my focus, that's where the FBI's focus

needs to be. These guys are on the line. We're doing all these raids across the country in Homeland Security Task Force. We just hit a 10,000 mark. We just arrested over 10,000 people in the 100 and change days that we've been doing this with DHS. Huge, right?

On illegals and whatnot. We also just like, this is great. This piece of information has actually made me happy. We are on track to have the lowest homicide rate ever. Murder rate, excuse me, murder rate ever. Trevor Burrus In the country? Aaron Ross Yeah. Trevor Burrus Really? Murder rate, excuse me, murder rate, ever. In the country? Yeah. Really?

We're already, and look, we got six more months to go, so we're not done yet for the year, but we're already down 20% from last year, and we broke it this week that right now, the murder rate, if we, the FBI, and our government partners achieve the mission, we'll give the American people the lowest murder rate in decades. That's incredible. And that's what I'm the focus on. So what steps have been made to do that? How did that become real? So I think, and I've worked with cops and law enforcement

a lot in the past, and you have too. They're awesome. All they wanted to do was do the work. Once President Trump got elected, before I even got the nomination, right? And excuse me, when I was traveling country with them before that, they were like, take the handcuffs off of us. Let us go do our jobs. And that's where I came up with, let good cops be cops. I said, if I'm going to get this job, that's what I'm going to do. I'm going to let you, the agents, the

police officers, the sheriffs, go out there and do the work you so badly want to do. And I'm going to give you the resources you need to do it. And I'm going to take away the politicization and weaponization saying, oh, we can't target this group or this thing or this area. And that's it. That's what we've done. Everywhere I go, I speak to cops across this country constantly and It's a humbling message that I receive back every time I talk to them. They're like and it's not me It's the president's administration and our entire government that's doing it. They're like, thank you for letting us do the work We want to chase child predators. We want to bust up MS 13 I mean look at the victories we've had for the American people. In the first two months, the FBI arrested three, not one, not two, but three of the world's

most top 10 wanted fugitives. Three. One of them happened to be the guy that was the Abbey Gate bomber. What was the Abbey Gate bomber? The terrorist that blew up 13 US soldiers in the Afghan withdrawal. Oh. I did it with my interagency partners in a week. In a week. We found that guy, went to Pakistan, brought him back here.

Now there's others responsible for it, and we're chasing them down too. But the question the American people should be asking is why didn't the prior administration, putting aside the disastrous withdrawal from Afghanistan, a plan that they completely politicized? We handed off them a proper way to do it and methodical way to do it,

and they just said, F you, we're doing it this way. And you saw the videos and you saw people plunging from our aircrafts, and you saw Abby Gaye and 13 Americans dead. Why didn't anyone go get justice for those families? Well that's the priority that the president said. We're gonna go find him and we let good cops be cops, we let federal agents be agents, we let our intel community focus intelligence collection on terrorists and we went and got that guy. It's so hard to believe that it's really

that simple that it's just they weren't given the resources and they weren't given the support to let cops be cops and that they could have done this all along. I don't know if that's the only answer. I'm just telling you what I'm doing and I think we're seeing some results. I appreciate that but as a person again who loves conspiracies, you know you look at that and you're like what would be the benefit of not letting cops be cops? Why would you want more crime? Why would you want more murders? Why would you want more murders?

Why would you not want to arrest bad guys? Well, you have to look at the landscape of the last, I don't know, four, eight, 12 years, call it right. It was an intentional decision. And this isn't politics. It was just an intentional decision to say, we're going to let all these people into our country and let them stay. The result of that is, you know, this is another part of the lift that we're doing at the Bureau.

We call them KSTs, known or suspected terrorists. They get pinged at the border, the northern border and the southern border, and then the last administration said, you guys can come in. And then one of the most terrifying things I heard was my predecessor, Christopher Wray, went to Congress a year or two ago and said, well, the last year's annual statistics for KSTs was a few dozen, and we don't know where they are in America.

What do you mean you don't know where they are? How is that not a national security crisis? And so what we're doing while we're doing these raids and chasing down illegals is trying to target those with terrorist affiliations, those who are terrorists, those who are in our homeland because the last administration let them be here. And that's – you can say I'm being political. I don't really care. But that's me being the FBI director and saying Americans come first and we're protecting our up and we're chasing them down. And DHS is doing a great job and so is our intelligence community and so are the local

police departments who are now working with us and not living in sanctuary cities and allowing police stations to be burnt to the ground, working with us and not living in sanctuary cities and allowing police stations to be burnt to the ground, working with us and not having law enforcement attacked constantly for just doing the job of protecting the American people. I think that's a tectonic shift in the mentality of what this administration has brought in. Now, people are still vilifying us for doing that.

How dare you separate families, they'll say, and I'm like, how dare you separate a mom from a kid on a fentanyl overdose? How dare you separate an American soldier's mom or dad from the guy that got blown up at Abbey Gate? I have different priorities. I have a different view of it. And so that's the ethos I'm bringing to the Bureau.

I appreciate everything you guys are doing. I just I'm baffled to try to come up with any kind of an explanation why anybody would let known or suspected terrorists into the country and just let them loose. I mean, when you, I mean, I know you can't speculate, but when you take office and you realize all this is going on like what what is going through your mind like how are you processing this like is this pure incompetence is this malice is this is this a foolhardy adherence to ideology and just completely ignore the danger that they're putting the American people in by doing this? It's I think it no it's intentional. The intentional decision was when you're going to let in what is it nine million people a

lot of them are going to be criminals a lot of them are going to be TDA you saw what they did in Colorado a lot of them are going to be MS 13 a lot of them are going to be narco traffickers which when you enter when you allow narco traffickers, which when you enter, when you allow narco traffickers in the country, you're automatically bringing sex traits, trafficking, human trafficking and drug trafficking automatically. And the drug traffickers have partnered with the terrorist organizations and our adversaries. We haven't even talked about Russia and the CCP and how they've combined forces over the last however many years to infiltrate America, not just with people, but our cyber capabilities

and our infrastructure. And so when I come into a job like this, patience is one of the hardest things you have to manage because you can't fix everything overnight. You have to build up the workforce. You have to get them the resources. You have to fix the infrastructure that's broken. I mean, I'll just give you a quick example.

The building that the FBI calls headquarters, the Hoover building, is like 70 years old. I literally have netting, mesh netting, holding up the side of the building because pieces of concrete fall off of it. So it doesn't hit people in the head. I'm not kidding, I'm dead serious. So I said, how about we give the workforce

a safe place to work? So we're moving out of there. And people think it's a political decision. Ocasio-Patel is taking the FBI out of the historic Hoover building. Yeah, because I don't want people to die. And I think they deserve a better workplace than something that's 70 years old that has pipes exploding literally every single week, every week. And also, we're going to save the taxpayer money.

We're going to get out of a building that would cost billions to fix and we're going to move into a location that's already built instead of a 15-year government boondoggle an hour outside of DC and we're going to stay in DC, we're going to stay near our partners in government, and we're going to put out the workforce and spread them out across the country like I talked to you about earlier and put more agents on the streets and put more agents in Indian country and put more agents in your communities and intel analysts to figure out where the crime is.

But that all of that takes time. I can't do it overnight. But why do you say Indian country? Like what tribal lands? Well what about tribal lands is problematic? Oh man. So this year, thank you so much for bringing this up. It's one of my biggest priorities.

So the tribal, and I just met with almost all of the the chiefs and the leaders of the tribal communities in America. The crimes they have committed on what we call Indian country is just as horrific, if not worse, than the rest of America. Look up the story about Emily Pike, whose family is still waiting for her arms. This child was murdered on a reservation

and they found a piece of her body and not the murderer and not the rest of her body. They are plagued by drugs and they have never been a priority in terms of law enforcement working together. And now remember, you're talking about two different sets of legal structures, right? They have their own and we have our own. But what I've asked of them, and what they've asked of me is, pay more attention, give us more resources.

What I've asked of them is said, hey, all the leaders said, let my guys on. Let my guys come to you, and let's work together on solving some of these horrific, horrific crimes. The trafficking, the murders and the violent crime on Indian reservations is skyrocketing and I'm not going to treat people who live in the United States of America differently because they have a different way of life. We're going to help them and we put out Operation Not Forgotten where we deployed this month and this summer.

I can't remember how many agents and intel analysts, specifically to remote tribal locations to solve crimes that have not been solved for years, specifically the most violent. And we're going to double down on that. And as Bongino likes to say, this summer, we are releasing a massive operation across the country. As Dan calls it, it's a bad day to be a bad guy this summer because the FBI is putting out all these extra agents and personnel into the field and we're going to come find you. If you think you can nest in our communities and find safe haven, you're going to prison.

Trevor Burrus That's great to hear. So when you guys sit around, you think about the motivation to let all these people into the country. I mean, again, you're kind of speculating, but why do you think they allowed it? Why do you think they allowed the border to be wide open like that? In my job now, that's like one of those political decisions, and so I try to stay out of that. But how is that political to leave the border? Like, how is a national security issue political?

So that's just it. From my perspective, it's a national security decision, and they failed on the national security mission. But I think where the decision from that administration to do that was a political one. That's what I'm trying to sort of separate. I've always viewed it singularly, protecting the border, preventing drugs from coming in, preventing terrorists from coming in, preventing people from... What political decision could be made that makes any sense at all to not do that?

I don't think there is one, but unfortunately, they did it anyway. Do you think it was just that Biden was just not there and everyone else that was really running things was completely incompetent, was focused on other things, was focused on maybe the optics of border protection that it, you know, that somehow or another there was some negative connotation to it politically? I don't I think it's I always say this. I think it's dismissive to say those people were incompetent. They're super smart. They're not dumb. And whether or not Biden was running

things or whatever conversation for other people to have. But there's lots of people around them who are very smart, who were in government for a long time. And they this is what I mean. They politicize the national security and law enforcement apparatus of this country by making those decisions. The why, you'd have to ask them. Ask them why they did that and why they thought that was OK and why people think it's OK for James Comey to go down a beach and put up 86 47. You know, that's another political act that hurts our national security from smart people who are doing it intentionally. And maybe because it's they

want press maybe because it's they're selling a book, maybe because it's they want notoriety. I don't know the answer to that. But for me, it's all national security related. And these people keep doing it over and over again. The good thing is now there's a bulwark against it, because we're in. And the president just is not having any of it. What was the case very recently where you guys caught a scientist bringing in pathogens?

Yeah, there it is. So I'm a New Yorker, and I brought this for a reason. This means spore. Yeah. Fucking New York Post is the best. Yeah, you got to do it. They're the best. They have this means spore. Yeah, fucking New York Post They're the best they have the best headlines ever. Yeah, so it's so funny It's based so the case is still go it's obviously ongoing since we just made the arrest So I'm a little limited what I can say but backing up the truck a little bit Agro-terrorism is a thing right the CCP isn't just coming at us with fentanyl and coming at us in our cyber infrastructure

and our capabilities in space and underwater. They are literally exporting people to the United States of America, having them end up being senior researchers like this individual at the University of Michigan. And the Bureau picked up on this and said, wait a second, why are you bringing you and her husband is also indicted, but he's in mainland China, so he's not here.

But we retraced what he did. And what's public now is that he also tried to come to this country to do the same thing. So they are making the connections on that. But what they did was literally bring in a mushroom that technically alone exists in the US, but in an altered state, causes billions of dollars of damage to wheat, to corn, to maize, and to agricultural industry, and also could wipe out your livestock

and causes reproductive damage to human beings. And so this is the lethality in terms of the mindset of people that wanna do harm to our country. In this case, I didn't know, this is one of those things where I knew it garnered a lot of attention, but like this thing went massive. Like it's everywhere. And I'm glad it's everywhere because it for me it highlights

the multiple levels of Operation that our adversaries are looking to do harm on us. Thank God we caught this one But what about the ones we've got to still catch that are still out there They're not gonna stop because this lady's in jail now, right and being prosecuted by us This is just the one you caught. This is the one we caught. So this is proof that this is actually an ongoing thing. It's been an ongoing thing. Just like, you know, why are we allowing our adversaries to buy land around our military

base? I'm just going to ask you that. You know, it's insane to me. It's lunacy. Having been the former chief of staff at DOD and having gone to a lot of our bases, I was just like, why is that Chinese CCP establishment right there? Why are the Russians right across the street?

Why do they provide towers for cell phones? Cell phones. And that's a trickier issue because that's not like a federal solve. That's a state by state issue. And a lot of states have taken action. I think the Dakotas are leading the charge up there by outlawing it and banning it and saying, nope, you can't do this. You can't buy this. Because a lot of these things have third party input, right? Right.

And a lot of these things, unfortunately, are just about money. Right. They'll sell it to you cheaper, but then they're spying on everybody. Then they're spying on everybody. Here's the thing. Like what I ask people, because what I get hit with is why shouldn't foreigners be able to buy land in America? I'm like, are you able to buy land in downtown Moscow?

Can you guys buy a farm in China? No. No. So what's with the disparate treatment? I get that we're the United States of America and we want to give everybody a chance and you gave this kid a chance, but that's different than literally inviting our adversaries into our country and saying, well, as long as you build extra, dump enough money into your state,

we can look the other way. So what can be done about the land that our adversaries own outside of military bases? Again, it's a state, it's like every state has to take steps legislatively, in my opinion, to either kick them off, stop the contracts, prevent them from coming in, things like that. What we can do at the federal level are things that you've seen the State Department under Marco Rubio do, revoking visas in certain places, in certain sectors of the economy.

And I think rightfully so. Because if you stop the personnel from coming in or kick them out, then who cares who owns it? It's basically a dead site. That's the vulnerability that we have for being such a free society. We allow foreign nationals to come in and go to universities and start and do research and become the head of these different departments. And they're constantly reporting back to the CCP or coordinating with them.

Yeah. Or Russia. Yeah. And they're not going to stop. That's the thing with these guys. It's just because you take one out. Unless you take a whole of government approach, unless you get buying from the American public. And again, this is one of those things that you would think is a national security issue, right? But they'll

politicize it. They'll weaponize it. The Post will write about it one way and it probably won't even make the headlines in a number of other outlets because they don't want to talk about that. Has the New York Times written about this, John? I have no idea. I mean, it seems like something that everybody should want to know about. If a foreign government, an adversary government, is trying to poison our food supply and human beings and affect our reproductive system,

that seems like that's a bipartisan issue. Yeah. And that's the thing about your show that I agreed that I wanted to do it is because getting out to a population that has stopped listening to mainstream news and reaching out to them and challenging them with information and how we're doing things and saying, look, this is our priorities. This is what I'm doing. Right. Is so hugely important because the audience, the influence of that manpower on the electorate is huge.

It's huge. And if we can reach through on certain, some of these issues, then we're gonna win collectively. Like, I can only arrest so many bad guys, and we will. But if we arrest them and people don't know who we're arresting and why we're arresting them and what the threat is, then it almost becomes irrelevant. We're still going to do it.

We're not going to stop. But if we can get more and more people talking about these things and saying, look, the national security of our country is of what's most important to me, not who wins the next election, but also we need to work with our communities to say, who's in our communities? How many registered sex offenders are there near our schools? Are they violating federal laws? Why aren't we on these priorities? And we need help.

We need American buy-in to really accomplish the mission. I wonder what heavy lifting has to be done to separate national security issues from political issues. And for everybody just to say, listen, all the other stuff that the Democrats disagree with or the Republicans disagree with, put that aside. We should all be concerned with stopping fentanyl, stopping gang members and cartel members and terrorists from coming into the country. How that becomes political to me is just fucking bananas. It really is crazy because it's just like if one side supports it, the other side has to be against it.

And you raise the reason it's so politicized and the reason it's so sort of in many sectors of government is because of the answer to that question. The leaks from inside of government and then the spin on that information by the media is what's causing the most harm in my opinion to the American public. What kind of leaks? Whether it's classified information or just leaks about fake news. Like people saying, oh, so and so hate each other at the White House. Did you hear about this meeting they had that never occurred?

And I was like, I was in that meeting. What are you talking about? What have you heard like that? What kind of like fake rumors? Oh, so I'll give you an example from actually the FBI, then the New York Times. So. Which never lies. No, no, of course not. from actually the FBI than the New York Times. Which never lies. No, no, of course not.

We're relying on them to solve everything. So we have a regular drumbeat at the FBI where everybody has a, we have a morning meeting with the heads of our divisions, counter intel, counter espionage, CT, everything, criminal, cyber, so we can move the machine. And I was like, and I did them for a week and I was like, why do we do these every morning? And the whole place looked at me.

These are career agents in Intel, folks, like 10, 20, 30 years in this seat. They go, boss, we hate those. They make us come offline of our work and focus on briefing you rather than staying on mission and we can come brief you in our own. So I chopped it to two days a week and I cut the time in like less than half. New York Times puts out the story, Cash Patel upends, and I'm paraphrasing, the ethos at the FBI, how dare he cut down the morning briefing cycle. And this is a perfect example of these people are coming to me saying this is what they wanted to do for years and I'm working with them to say that's a good idea.

Why don't we do that? But the Times comes in and kicks us in the face with this leak that's not even true because they go out and say anonymous source this, retired person that. It's just one example It might it might sound small to you But now a reader is gonna read that a new kid who's like, oh, I'm maybe I'm gonna join the FBI and they're gonna look At and say this place is a circus. I don't want to go work there What do you mean they disrupted the morning meeting that guy should be getting briefed six hours a day, right? You know and I'm like no I want my agents on mission. I don't need them briefing me. I can call them

I can talk to them later and so it's just stuff like that Since we were talking about fake news this is gonna come up because it's been going on since we've been recording here Elon and Trump seem to be in a little bit of a spat Joe You want to check the tweet that Elon just put out a little bit ago time to drop the really big bomb Donald Trump is in the Epstein files. That's the real reason they have not been made public. Have a nice day. Jesus Christ. I'm not participating in any of that conversation between Elon and Trump. What is he? Have a nice day? DJ D? So much day gets thrown away. They're going back and forth about different

things. Yeah. Well, he said he was disappointed in Elon. Yeah, he told him to leave. Jesus Christ, that's a crazy thing to say How does he know does he know that Donald Trump is in the Epstein files? Does he have access to the I'm just I don't Know how he would but I'm just staying out of the Trump Elon thing. That's way out. Fuck are they doing? I know my lane in that I just don't I Mean, I understand he owns Twitter. I think it's bad for your mental health I think posting things public all day and arguing. I think it's bad for your mental health. I think posting things public all day and arguing with people all day is bad for you.

Well, you raise a great point. Sorry to cut you off. Go ahead. Half of what we have to respond to is the click army on social media. Right. And 50% of that plus is bots. 50% of that plus is bots, but let's take the other 50% of that plus is bots. 50% of that plus is bots, but let's take the other 50% of that.

It's just constantly pushing out information to sell t-shirts or subscriptions or whatever. Listen to my show. And then people are like, hey, FBI, why aren't you looking at this thing in Oklahoma? And I'm like, because it's fake. I don't have time for that and And so to your point on like social media does have a great use in terms of me

And so the reason Dan and I don't do a lot of media is because we're the FBI like let our work speak for itself Right, but we have to find the right balance of going to do media and posting on social media the things we're doing and keep Keeping people updated. And so that's the delicate balance we're trying. But what I'm learning is no matter what you do, it doesn't matter. It's going to just completely not make everyone happy. And there's no solve for that in terms of how the FBI operates. But at the same time, the FBI won't be thwarted by it.

We're going to keep going. Like, do you know, I mean, I've already told you I've been called a genocidal dictator, which is ironic since I'm the son of a man who fled a genocidal dictatorship in East Africa and his parents lawfully immigrated to this country and had me and now their kids the FBI director, first generation Indian kid kind of pretty freaking cool story That is a cool story, but I'm like that's what me and Dan say all the time You can call us whatever you want, but genocidal dictator like that You know those words don't mean anything anymore if you're calling you that well, that's what I mean

That's you're not a dictator and you're not genocidal. So what are you doing tagging both of those together? What is the proof and what is the media doing printing it? It's that's insane That's an insane thing. But I think they were given a mandate to be the attack dogs You know, I think they were and I think during the last administration they reinforced that I think Just look what happened with the hunter Biden laptop story where 51 former intelligence agents Testified that thank you for bringing that up that tell me about how crazy that is So you want to talk about the ultimate weaponization and total disinformation?

combining forces right a week before The election when Biden and Trump were running against you maybe a week or two weeks before that right? election when Biden and Trump were running against each other, maybe a week or two weeks before that, right? The guy who used to be in the intelligence community says, oh, we got to bring the Hunter Biden laptop thing into play, knowing it was bogus. And they come out and they basically say the FBI, even though knew that Hunter Biden's laptop was a righteous piece of investigatory material and were examining it and at the time knew that they were going to work up criminal leads on it, sat silent, put that over here.

The intelligence community comes in and says, we got to get this information out because the guy who would end up becoming Biden's secretary of state was advising him and saying, hey, we got to squash this Hunter Biden laptop thing. Let's do the Russiagate play. Let's do the crossfire hurricane play. So they go to the CIA and they go to then Director Gina Haspel, who, by the way, there's no coincidence in government, Gina Haspel was Chief of Station London when Russiagate was launched in London. We can come back to that. So now she's Director director CIA and we're on the even election and there's this thing called a pre publication process So like when I had to put my book out as a government service server Serve it whatever you call it

It has to go in and everybody's gonna read it and I got a chop it and whatever takes forever Even if it's a two-page document The 51 Intel letter was written by these same people, some of who participated in Russiagate. And the person that has to authorize that is the director of the CIA before it goes public. Do you know how long she took to authorize the release of the letter?

Knowing the information in the letter was false. Knowing that a laptop with under Biden's information on it was true and accurate and being investigated by the Federal Bureau of Investigation for criminal purposes, eight hours, eight hours. They released that barrage of disinformation for eight hours and what do we do? We've spent the last four years proving up and we've got more information coming on that too, proving up how those former secretaries of defense, CIA, NSA, deputy directors of the intelligence community all came together to politicize intelligence once again because they got caught on Russia gate and don't care

and they wanted President Biden to win so badly they were willing to lie to the American people and they did it again. That is so insane. It's so hard to believe because it's so corrupt and coordinated. The fact that 51 people would be willing to do that. And they've doubled down on it. They keep doubling down on it. How are they doubling down? In what way?

They've been asked. In the year since, they've been like, hey, actually, do you remember the time where Hunter Biden got charged in two separate felony federal indictments in two different districts? And they're like, now we stand by our—like, the people that signed the letter have said, we stand by. Guys like Clapper and Brennan and all these guys, Panetta. No, no. So they stand by the idea that that laptop was Russian disinformation.

And they know it's not. And these guys who rose the highest ranks in government service won't come off that perch because the media will allow them to be propped up. Wow. And it's the same, look, totally switching gears, but a similar disinformation tale, January 6th, right? I was chief of staff at the DOD on January 6th. Days before January 6th, I was in the Oval Office with the President,

the Secretary of Defense, the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff on a foreign matter. And on that day, he goes, hey, you know, how's it looking for January 6th? Do you guys have everything you need? And he goes, I'm going to authorize up to 10 to 20,000 National Guardsmen and Women if you guys need them anywhere in the country. The reason that's important is because we can't uniformly deploy military in the United States. That's what the National Guard's for. But in order to do that, the president has to, one, authorize it, and, two, the mayor or governor, so it's D.C., so it's the mayor and the Capitol Police and the Speaker of the House are in charge, have to request the deployment of troops. We went to them days before January 6.

We went to Bowser, we went to Pelosi. They said no in writing. We were excoriated for it. Your guys are lying. You didn't offer this up. If you had been there, this would have never happened. Well, actually, President Trump preemptively authorized 10,000 to 20,000 National Guard. And what happened?

I spent the next three years and hundreds of thousands of dollars in legal fees testifying before Congress, proving up just what I had said was the truth. Then the documents came. We finally got them out because I know what we had written. And it showed Bowser in writing, declining National Guard. It showed Pelosi in writing saying no to the Capitol Police, don't get the National Guard. So they wanted it to be chaos. Well, I'll leave to you on that. But what I'm telling you is they knew, they knew what was true, they knew what was false. And I'm not asking you to give an opinion on the

events of January 6. But had 10,000 of my guys been there, do you think it would have gone differently? Yeah, 100%. They stopped it and they spent years lying and now we're still lying about that authorization, even though we've put it to bed, like Russiagate, like Hunter Biden's laptop, 51 Intel letter. They keep doing it over and over again. What about agent provocateurs that were involved in January 6th? So what we just released to Congress was, I think, we're still digging through it, is there was a couple of dozen sources that were involved with January 6th.

And so we're getting Congress those files and the American people are going to learn the extent of that. We're doubling down on our investigation on the pipe bomber because we think it's of great public importance that someone almost blew up the headquarters for the RNC and DNC. And oh, by the way, the vice president of the United States happened to be in the vicinity of that pipe bomber. How did that pipe bomb not detonate? Was it faulty?

Or did they never activate it? Yeah, it's the latter. And so we keep going back to events like January 6. And I keep trying to say, hey, again, don't trust me. I was, we put out the truth about Russiagate, about 51 Intel letter, about Hunter Biden's laptop, about the National Guard on January 6. These are the guys that are now in charge about these sensitive issues like the pipe bomber, and all this information you want. So we're giving you, we're the ones that are reopening these investigations and doubling down on them. COVID origins, we think that there was definite foul play, but my opinion is irrelevant. It only matters what I can show to the American

people and prove. And that's what we're working on. That's why I don't run out there and say, look, we're going to get this guy, we're 100% going to get him. We're working our butts off to get him. We're also working our butts off to identify who brought cocaine in the White House. Because when you bring a felony narcotic into the most secure compound in the world, I think the world has a right to know. Yeah, is there footage of that? So we're on it. There's like a known guy who likes coke, who happened to be at the White House at the same

time. Well, again, like, let also I don't want to jump to conclusions because, you know, I've done this for a long enough time where even the most obvious suspect you you're like, my shit, it wasn't him, it was her. And so let's do it methodically. We are. It's of great public. If someone brought a dime bag of cocaine or heavy packages, I don't know, or pills, offenses, and all into the White House now in a Trump administration, what do you think the media

would say? What a wild motherfucker doing coke in the White House. You know how wild you have to be to be doing lines in the bathroom of the White House? I was like dancing the line when I was using the bathroom that I wasn't supposed to use because I wanted to go to the East Wing and they had a nicer setup. And I was like hiding my badge. That's as far as I took it. It's just such a crazy thing to do. You have to be completely off the rails

where you can't be on coke for just a few hours while you're hanging out at the White House. You're like, no, no, no, I need a little bump. I need a little bump in the White House. It's crazy, man. I would think that everybody would get urine tested immediately upon finding that bag. Well, you could have done a lot of things then,

but they didn't. Of of course they didn't want it I mean there wasn't even a suspect right now for them. There's like a whatever we're done And I was wild wild right? Yeah, and you know, so it's just Yeah, I mean you have to My other mission is to Control the things I can control. Was the bathroom the men's room or the women's room or was it like an all gender bathroom

where anybody can go into? You know, I'm not sure. I gotta go back. It's a good point, right? I gotta go back and look. I actually gotta go back and look. But I think when we do these things and we answer these questions for the American people,

we're restoring the trust in the FBI. That's what I can control. That's sorely needed. Because when I go around the country, this is not me saying it or the leadership saying it. The FBI's credibility took a hit because of these actions by these few people in charge. And we're building it back. We've done a lot in 100 days to get it back.

And I think if you wait for the rest of this year, you're going to see some massive, massive actions taken over the summer. And our priorities, and I changed it, are sort of our website and our pillars. Uphold the Constitution, defend the homeland, crush violent crime, and rigorous constitutional congressional oversight so that we restore trust. That's what we want to do. Now, a lot of people got pardons, like more pardons, I think, than anyone ever, right? Yeah, ever. Does the pardon cover it? Like, if you find that Fauci lied to Congress, like when Rand

Paul was talking to him about gain of function research, clearly he was being deceptive. If someone is that, are they pardoned for that as well? Because it was like this crazy blanket pardon from 2014 forward, which I didn't even know you could do. So I'm the investigator. So that would be a decision for the Department of Justice. They'll have to make that. I don't know the answer to that.

We'll work it up and we'll say this is what we found. And then legal minds will have to come in and chop on does this pardon apply or not. Is that the same sort of thing apply to the 51 intelligence agents that lied about the laptop? I think the same scenario applies to anyone who got the pardon. I can't remember exactly who off the top of my head got it, if there was some of them or none of them or what happens. But that's never happened before in the history of the country.

So there's literally no like legal precedent as we say to figure out how that goes. But what I can do, irrespective of the pardon and how it applies, is produce the information and documents. Geez. What a crazy place to come into. It's a gong show. Is it surprising how dysfunctional it is to you? Well, I think I would change that a little bit.

I think I'm thrilled at how functional most of the FBI is. I'm shocked at the levels of depravity, and even me, that few in leadership would do to alter that and then go out to the public and lie about it. Like you got James Comey running around and he can yell at me all he wants and Andy McCabe can too. This is another perfect example, right? These two guys used to run the Bureau.

And we had a guy in Denver without a shirt off running around throwing 16 Molotov cocktails on human beings shouting free Palestine. I got that information because I'm the director of the FBI and I put out a statement because the American people need to know we are investigating this matter as an act of terrorism. CNN, New York Times come in and crush us. These guys don't know what they're doing, how dare they label it as such, the investigation is still ongoing. And I said, yes, I'm investigating the matter in which a man who was from overseas in Egypt threw Molotov cocktails at American citizens at a peaceful rally and screamed free Palestine. That's what you want your FBI doing. What

you don't want your FBI doing is having New Orleans and Super Bowl and having another known terrorist come in there and run people over and kill them and then have the FBI go to the podium and say, this is not an act of terrorism. That is the politicization of the FBI. That's what we've changed.

And I think the American people are seeing it. And I think our results are speaking to it. But that doesn't even make sense that the New York Times would criticize that and criticize the description of it as an act of terrorism when it by definition is an act of terrorism. But the action itself, you're throwing molotov cocktails on human beings that are at a political peaceful rally. That's terrorism, isn't it? I mean, what is terrorism if that's not terrorism?

And what I can say, remember, the charging is for the Department of Justice and partners. What I can say is what I'm investigating it as. And that's what I'm investigating it as. Because the facts to that point in time quickly relate to me by our people in the field, the pros, said, hey, this is what we got. This is what happened. Everyone's talking about it. Let's report out to the American people what we can responsibly. And that was a responsible way of doing it. But that's what I'm saying. These people that used to run the FBI are coming in there and they would have made the same decisions. It's just the fact that we're making them and they got fired because they got caught

conspiring against the United States of America and weaponized the FBI and CNN's given them a platform They keep crippling this country by putting out these stupid statements Or not stupid these intentionally false statements to attack us and again, you can hit me and bond gene all you want We don't care. We're winning. I believe we're winning this fight. We're winning it because the American people are like, hey That was an act of terrorism. I hope you get the bad guys. And I don't know if you just saw, but we also remember the fertility clinic that was bombed in Southern California. We just busted the co-conspirator in Poland and brought him back last night. And now he's getting charged because publicly what we can say is he procured like something like 45 pounds of ammonium nitrate

So what we're doing is investigating acts of terrorism as acts of terrorism and we're utilizing our authorities overseas Under that to give the American people justice the guy didn't act alone. What about the shooter this the savage people justice, the guy didn't act alone. What about the shooter, the savage shooter in Washington, DC, who comes in and murders two people for the Israeli embassy in cold blood, like just literally, what is it, 21, I don't know how many shots, right? Yelling something, free Gaza, whatever.

We investigated that as an act of terrorism, because that's what it is. That's what the American people deserve to hear. I'm not saying they don't have a presumption of innocence. I'm not saying that they're going to be convicted at trial. But I'm telling you as the director of the FBI what I'm doing as the number one cop in this country and who's in charge of investigations. That's my call to make and I'll make it every time. I just don't understand how the media, particularly the thing in Colorado, how they could print that this is not an act of terrorism and not diminish all of whatever credibility they have left.

I just don't understand why they would even be willing to do that. I think it all goes back to the same derangement syndrome that people have. Their hatred for certain individuals and people who dare to work in those administrations is so great that they don't care about the truth. They care about the platform. And they'll go on and they'll be given a platform on TV or print media or on other shows and there's still a significant portion of the American populace that is willing to give them their ear.

That's what I'm trying to change. We're never going to get everybody but if we can get 10% of them, I think it's a home run. We get 20. We're totally winning all day long, but it's going to take time. Yeah. I mean, I know that people are super everybody wants Ozempic today, right? They just want to, you know, they want a quick fix. And when you're dealing with four years of whatever the hell was going on, and 9 million people being released into this country and all the all the stuff that comes with it it just would stand

to reason it would take a long time to unravel all that mm-hmm or to fix all the problems that were created that is man I hope you've clipped that and play that over and over again that's what I've been trying to explain to people I'm like we're gonna fix as much as we can, but you guys want answers yesterday for problems that have been metastasizing for decades. Also you want to have all the information in place when you finally do go public with everything where you can't miss things, not cross a T, dot an I, and someone can get off. That and we also, two-pronged, that is just as equally as important as the following.

We wanna fix the institution so it doesn't happen again. That's the bigger win. Catching the bad guys is the everyday job. We're gonna do it. Calling out the people who corrupted the place in the past is hugely important. But leaving the American people, an FBI, a DOD, a CIA, a functional national security apparatus is my ultimate

goal. So, the apparatus that was in place before that was so riddled with corruption, what do you think happened between Trump's, between when he was in for the first term and the four years? Like, how did it get so bad? Oh, when he was in for the first term and the four years, like how did it get so bad? Oh, in the, when he left? Yes.

Yeah, when he left in the last four years. I mean, I'm assuming there was always corruption. But how did it get so bad in these past four years? Because of the priorities. They completely shifted the priorities. But how does that encourage corruption amongst the top officials? Because the priorities themselves were corrupt. Focusing on DEI and climate change is a political pot shot to weaponize the Department of Defense and the intelligence community and the law

enforcement community to say we're going to promote you based on your background and beliefs rather than your ability to get through the pipeline. You know another thing we're doing is we're changing the PFT, the physical fitness test at the Federal Bureau of Investigation for new agents and for current agents because it's wholly insufficient. I'm not asking you to be a special forces operator but I am asking you to be able to take down a dude running away from you in a hundred yard sprint Maybe twice your size and detain him and safeguard the American public

And so when you don't focus on those things for years years And you focus on promoting people based on I'm not here because the color my skin, but when you do that This is what happens and then when the media celebrates these victories, people are like, oh yeah, I'm going to subscribe to that because I hate the other side so much. I'm just going to go along. I honestly don't believe what most of the people are putting out there in the media that they actually believe it. I think they go home at night and they're like, yep, we know this is wrong, but we've

made our bed and we are going to sleep in it every single night and we are not going to retract. That is such an insane decision. It's such an insane decision and again, it diminishes the credibility of an already damaged organization. I mean, now people know about Russiagate, they know about the Hunter Biden laptop store, they know about the Steele dossier, they know about all this shit that happened, like, their faith in media over, especially after the pandemic, their faith in media has been deteriorated so badly, that I can't imagine they wouldn't just, for self-preservation reasons, shift course. But they have been, the problem is they have been able to persevere in their space and they're not looking

to persevere anything past that. I mean look at the from a monetary standpoint most of the media has been losing money for years. Right. You know but they keep reporting it they don't care. Most of these editors and chiefs that these big wig Operations get blown out the door in a year or two new people coming in by it They keep losing money most of these shows on Main Street Media at the TV shows at night Their hosts get fired every other minute because their ratings suck But the institutions themselves don't care to change. They don't go bring in a Joe Rogan That would probably be what it takes in my opinion to fix something like that themselves don't care to change. They don't go out and bring in a Joe Rogan. That would probably be what it takes, in my opinion,

to fix something like that. Do you imagine? I don't think you should do it. Get the fuck out of here. They would torture me. It would be horrible. Every news story. I mean, you see that they're willing to lie in the news.

You see they're willing to push narratives that just are not true. It's just so hard to imagine how you can sustain the American people's trust. And if you don't sustain the American people's trust, then you're going to keep losing money. I just, I can't imagine. I know CNN made some of a concerted effort to try to be objective for a while. They brought on Scott Jennings. They've changed a bunch of things in that regard. But it's still like some of

the panel talks they have, you're just like, what fucking planet are you guys even living on? Right. And the problems we're facing, he does a good job of highlighting. He's like, hey, man, these pro-Hamas positions didn't happen overnight. They happened because we let in all these people from all over the world and they came in and they started attending our universities and they started getting together and they started seeing in the media that that was a quote unquote popular thing to do. And then that ethos spread and now look what we have. We have chaos on college

campuses. We've got lone wolf attackers. We've got terrorists, we've got openings for our narco traffickers. We haven't even touched upon what our adversaries are doing to our cyber infrastructure. I mean, Salt Typhoon is a massive telecommunications breach engineered by the CCP. It's public, it's not classified. And they literally got into our hour, United States of America's telecommunications providers, broken. And we are playing catch up. These are the priorities we're focused on. We have solutions for them. They take time. They're not sexy. No one wants to talk about upgrading the nuclear arsenal of the triad. It's not the sexy thing to talk about. But that's what we need to do. No one wants to talk about hardening our

infrastructure and fixing our grid switch system across the country. You take out one electrical grid infrastructure plant and you take out a large chunk of this country. But when you don't prioritize those things for years in these last however many years, then our adversaries get hip to it and they say, hey, there's a vulnerability. Let's double down. And what our adversaries are doing, we haven't even talked about the war and Hamas and all that stuff. We don't have to. But they're teaming up. They're saying, look, we really don't like each other, but we don't like America more. So why don't we partner up? Why don't we use you, the drug trafficking organizations

in Mexico, for human smuggling, not just drugs? Why don't we use you, Russia, Iran, the CCP get together? We'll sell ammunition to you because you can't get them from anywhere else in the world. You don't have access to banks. You know, the biggest threat we have from a counterterrorism standpoint is Iran. And that's why the president's trying to achieve a peaceful resolution with them and end this war that Hamas started in October in Israel and Gaza. And nothing would be a better solution than a peaceful one to that because we talked about hostages before. And what did they just report out? Two more American Israeli citizens' bodies were uncovered yesterday or the day before? the cost of these wars people don't see and feel right away and

Unless you give them in your face 24-7 coverage of it Their focus is gonna be on what CNN's talking about and how they're talking about it. Yeah. And that's part of the shift. And that's like one of the large reasons, I was like, we have to come on this show.

We have to at least swing at it. I don't know how many people, maybe no one will watch it, maybe some people watch it. Oh, a lot of people are gonna watch this. No, but that's not the point for me. We just have to try to reach different audiences. But that's not the point for me. We just have to try to reach different audiences. We have to have to have to have to try.

Yeah, well I don't think people have heard it from your perspective before like this, especially over a long form. I know you have a hard out at 3 o'clock. Yeah, sorry. It's 3 o'clock now. So thank you. Thanks for being here. Really appreciate it.

And I appreciate you illuminating a lot of these things that I think are very confusing to a lot of people. And I think you've answered a lot of questions as to like how long time takes and what the process is like. But I appreciate everything you're doing. It means a lot to me. I can't believe that was two hours. That's awesome.

Hopefully I can come back. But look, absolutely, please do. Just a parting message, if I may. I appreciate the show and what you've done. And I love seeing you at UFC fights. I'll see you at one soon. But we, I just want to say this for the folks at the FBI. And I probably should have answered when you first asked me.

The thing I'm most proud of is most all of them. They're crushing it. They're crushing it. They're crushing it and they've been wanting to do it for so long that this part, this job is easy. My job is easy. What they're doing is hard. Me moving people around the country, taking them from their families, uprooting them, and everybody's like, that's the mission. That's what we're here to do. And I don't want people to take away, oh, okay, he's bought and sold by everybody

that corrupted the place. If you look at the show and you look at it in its entirety and don't take clips from it, you'll see what we're about in putting the mission first forward. All right, thank you very much. Thanks, brother. Appreciate you. Yeah. All right, bye everybody. Take care.