The Jordan B. Peterson Podcast - 370. Your Children Are Schooled to Be Factory Workers | Zach Lahn

Episode Date: June 26, 2023

Dr. Jordan B. Peterson and Zach Lahn discuss the Wonder School, a Socratic-based education system in Wichita, Kansas. They delve into the value of learner-driven education, the origins of the American school system as a means to create obedient factory workers, and the true role of schools in shaping a child’s character. They also walk through a day in the life of a Wonder Leaner, the curriculum designed to help inspire these students toward their true calling, and exactly why this unconventional approach might be well worth your consideration as a parent. Zach Lahn is the co-founder of Wonder, a learner-driven school in Wichita, Kansas, with the mission of helping young people find their calling and preparing them to change the world. His background in business has been as a founder of a search fund focused on acquiring and building small to medium companies. Prior to founding Wonder, Zach managed U.S. Congressional and Senatorial campaigns and raised funds for startup companies and nonprofit organizations. He now spends nearly all of his time at school with his six kids and with his wife, building a regenerative farm on his family’s ancestral homestead in Iowa. - Links - For Zach Lahn: Twitter @ZachLahn https://twitter.com/ZachLahn The Wonder School www.daringtowonder.com/

Hello everyone watching and listening. Today I'm speaking with Zach Lane, the co-founder of Wonder, a socratic-based school system, K-12, in which it tarcans us. It's a follow-up to a discussion I had with Jeff Sandefur, who's an innovator on the educational front for K-212. And I wanted to talk to Zach today about the details of the educational process, so that parents and other people interested in childhood education could understand more thoroughly the mechanics of the process. First of all, I have holes in my memory, you know, because I was ill for a while, and I don't remember how we met. We met through Jeff, eh? Actually, it was the opposite. Oh, okay. It was,

I was working in education and became a listener to a lot of what you were doing and a follower in some ways. And then you had explained how you had so much interest in revolutionizing education in various different ways. And so with that, I reached out to you. I sent a cold email to you and we met Father's Day, maybe 2018 in Minneapolis. And we sat down and we talked about education and from there, it sort of spurred into this, hey, we're very aligned. We have similar interests and we're wanting to see a similar change. And from that, then introduce you to Jeff and we started kind of working with the Acton MBA, the Acton Academy, and that's how it all started. I see, I see.

Now, so you're deeply involved in educational transformation. You have a school and you're gonna be taking over the Acton program at some point in the future. Well, we're taking a leadership role in the Acton program. Yeah. Sure. We have an independent decentralized network is what I would say of schools. And our school is called Wonder. Okay, and who's we? So I would say,

well, my wife and I co-founded our school. And so that's when I say we, that's usually who I'm talking about, what we found wonder. And the process for me was, Acton wasn't actually the first place I looked. This whole thing started for me out of necessity. And the reason was, when I was a young kid, I didn't fit in the box. I had too much energy. I was probably too enterprising. My parents and principal didn't know what to do with me.

I can remember a parent teacher conference when my principal, who was a teacher at the time, told my parents, if I was ever stuck on a desert island, I'd wanna be a Zach, because he'd find a way off. But that wasn't necessarily a good thing. It was sort of like, how do we solve that problem? And so when my first son was born, I had a call from an uncle and he said to me,

hey, congratulations, I sold the hospital. And as a joke, he said, well, 90 just sort of think about schools. And I'd spent my entire life trying to get out of school Basically just wanting to be done with education get into the world get into business or whatever it might be And when he said that it was one of those times that something strikes you and that struck me and I hadn't thought about it And so that kicked off what was about a five or six year journey which was Traveling the country visiting schools,

I probably visited over 70 schools around the country and in other countries as well. And one of those was acting academy. And so that's how I got connected there. And so what did you see when you went and saw all these schools? So mostly it was this. There was varying flavors or the attempt to put a different,

maybe screen over what was essentially the same model. Almost all of them were the same direct instruction model that we see. Teacher at the front of the classroom, lecturing to students, students in decks all day, and days broken up by periods. Now, somewhere working more in vocational skills. There's some that were like helping young people, you know, learn the trades and things like that. Great.

Others were quite innovative. There's some we worked with a school on the campus of MIT that was for middle school high schoolers. That was quite innovative. There were very hands-on, very project oriented, very project driven. But what I noticed is that it was still something that was ultimately led by adults. And so that seemed to be the trend.

Everyone, no matter how innovative the school was. So the basic model that you perceived was teacher in the front of the room, rows of desks, regimented periods, the children as absorbing knowledge essentially, knowledge as something delivered as factual. You saw a lot of variations on that, but no fundamental transformation. Oh yeah, variations on that, also variations on socioeconomic status within the school.

That was something, because when many people think about school, they think public and private. What they don't understand is 99% of those schools operate the exact same way. Just what you described. One teacher at the front of the classroom and students listening, trying to absorb taking notes and not being necessarily engaged in hands on learning or taking ownership over their own learning.

Yeah, well, it's an interesting model. It's an interesting epistemological model because it presumes that the most appropriate knowledge, the most necessary form of knowledge that children will gain is factual and descriptive, right? That it's semantic. It can be transmitted through words. That it's memorization predicated. That it comes from a central authority, that the children should be socialized to sit immobile essentially and listen passively rather than actively, that

they should do that in a group, that they should be regimented in time, right? So you might say, contrary to that, while children should be actively engaged in exploring, they should be questioning them They should be moving around. There's no necessary reason for that regimentation They should be developing their own vision the the enterprises could be project focused And that education should be much more about the acquisition of skill rather than the acquisition of regurgitatable knowledge. And that that's a few transformations that you might consider.

And so, okay, but you said that while you were investigating all these schools, you came across the Act and Academy and what made it stand out in your mind? Well, it's all the things that you just mentioned are all what I would call, there's some about the process that you go through within the school and much about the content that you're going to absorb in the school or that you're engaging with. What I think that we need to step back and look at is that when we're talking about differing schools, what we look at is not so much the content, the academic content. We know largely what young people should be engaged in as far as like the basics, like we know that.

What we talk about is the system. And what I mean by this is, let me give you an anecdote. I've probably talked to over a thousand parents at this point about our school, about what they want from education for their child. And one question I always ask is, what do you dream your child will be able to do when they're 18 or when they leave the house? And without exception, I do not get an academic answer. I do not get, I hope they

can do complex math. I hope that they've mastered calculus. I hope that, you know, I don't get academic answers. What I get, especially younger the child is, is I hope they can go out into the world with courage. I hope they can know how to be. Well, yeah, work well with other people. I did touch on in that list of alternatives was character development, moral character development and motivation, right?

And so, all right, so the parents have a vision that's more aligned with that. They want their child to be of good character, to be able to go out into the world forth rightly. And so, so what do you make of that when you hear parents tell you that? Well, what I make of it is that almost all parents want that. However, when you try to marry the idea of the traditional school with what I would say parents are actually asking for as agency, they want their child to have agency over their life,

which is having the power and resources to fulfill their potential. Something like that. And so, when I look at the traditional model, you look at it's predicated on compliance. It's predicated in control, permission to speak, permission to move about, permission to work with others. What I say is, those two things don't marry. You can't put your child

in a system like that and expect that they will fulfill this potential of agency because those are some of the most formidable years of your life. You think three to twelve especially from the development of the brain. Like you're learning what system you're within and how to operate within that system. And it's actually quite a conundrum for people, especially with conservative beliefs, because we say, hey, this is what we want. We talk about it at home, we talk about agency and freedom and responsibility.

And yet, we send our children to a school that doesn't advocate for any of those. Yeah, well, I did some background research into the origin of the public school system, partly because I developed these programs, the self-authoring programs, and one of them is an exercise that helps people develop a vision for the future, and I implemented that with my university students first, and so it asks them to imagine their lives five years down the road.

They could have, if they could have what they needed and wanted, assuming they were taking care of themselves properly, what might their life look like? They write about that for 15 minutes, and then they write about the hell they could produce around themselves for in five years if they let their bad habits, take the upper hand, and then they go through seven major domains of their life and write out a vision and a strategy for that. So it's intimate relationship and family, friendship, career, resistance to temptations like alcohol and drug abuse, use of time outside of outside of work, let's say productive and generous use of time outside of work, and care of

themselves physically and mentally, we're going to add civic responsibility to that list. And so it's an attempt to help people derive, create a differentiated vision of what their life could be like and who they could be. And also to conceptualize themselves as the sort of person who can drive a vision. And I used that in my classes for years and I conducted three research studies using that program and we showed that if you had students do that exercise for 90 minutes in their orientation session before they went to trade school, they were 50% less likely to drop out, which is like an absolutely staggering result.

And their grade point averages of students already enrolled went up 35%, right, which is crazy, right, for 90 minutes. But the crazy, the really crazy thing was, as far as I was concerned, and it took me probably a year or two of thinking to really notice this was that, well, this isn't rocket surgery as a ridiculous Canadian comedian would put it right. Of course, people should have a vision for their life. You talked about character development, moral developments, like, well, that's what parents want for their children.

We would like our children. We would like those. We love to be active engaged moral agents, aiming upward. And yet we do nothing whatsoever in the school system to foster that ever, even once, even for one day. So my students, having, despite having gone through 14 years of education and being top of the class, all things considered because the University of Toronto was a fairly selective school. No one had ever asked them to do an exercise like that or not. The more I thought about that, the more I was dumbfounded by it. And then I did some investigation

into the derivation of the North American European for that matter, public education system and found out that it was based on the Prussian model. And the Prussians produced a universal education system in the late 1800s because they were afraid they were losing military superiority and they wanted to produce a cadre of mindless obedient soldiers. That was expressly the purpose. And then that model was adopted by prototypical fascists in the US, again in the late 1800s, this before Mussolini in all of that time, corporate types mostly, who wanted to produce cowdraze of obedient workers. And that's why the desks are in rows, and that's why there's factory bells, and that's why it's top-down leadership. But what was really stunning about that wasn't only that that was the model, but it's worse than that because the people who built the schools

were consciously aiming at eradicating the will of the students who were part of the system because they wanted them to be obedient. Now, we did, we, there was a demand for factory workers at the time, and there were a lot of rural people flooding into the cities, and no one really knew what to do with the kids because they didn't have farm work. And there was some need for an education system, and there was some utility in producing people who knew how to abide by a clock and who could their foretake on factory jobs. But that as a model, especially now in the modern world, where things change so quickly that you can hardly keep up

and people have to be dynamic. And that sort of nine to five lifetime factory work is maybe, well, it's a dream of the past in some ways, even though it might not have been that desirable to begin with, it certainly has nothing to do with the way people live now. But, well, the education system hasn't changed, except perhaps through the worst in 150 years.

It's just, it's absolutely jaw dropping, the fact that this is all the case. Okay, so you saw in the act in schools, you saw completely different modeling. Walk us through that. Like, I don't even understand what a school day would look like in a decentralized system. I went to London, I saw Kate Burble Singh school,

in the Kayla school, and she's taken that teacher-dominant, let's say teacher authority, student listening model, to its ultimate degree. I mean, she's very, very good at it. The teachers are handing out information at a rate that's absolutely staggering, and the kids are awake and listening. Although they're responding a lot, they have an opportunity to talk to each other that's structured, and they do a lot of responses to the teachers, so they're really engaged. And I can see that a model like that can work, right?

There may be a variety of models that would work for kids, but your model is very different. And so what would a child experience, what would a classroom do you have classrooms? What would a classroom look like? What would a typical classroom look like? What's the typical experience of a child

in a school like yours? Yeah, so I think you have to start with understanding the role of the adult, the classroom. And when you understand that in today's age, with what we have, the tools we have available to us, and the systems that we use, we do not have a need for an adult to be the transmitter of content knowledge to a child. In elementary, middle school, high school, we've proven that. We know that it's been going on for over a decade. So at our school, young people are broken up into different ages.

It's not a monoculture, which that exists nowhere in nature. You know, I'd ever see a buffalo only with like one set of ages roaming the plains. So we have varying studios that somewhat line up with what you say, like lower elementary, upper elementary. Some of this comes as well from an understanding of what Maria Montessori has done and did. And a lot of that has was stood the test of time. And really quickly to digress for a second, what you mentioned about, you know, 1894, the

gang of nine got together, I think it was, and decided, this is what people should learn, physics, biology, chemistry, and this is how they should learn. And that largely has not changed at all. But it's important to know, at that same time, there was a debate being waged about how young people should be educated. Some of these models like Montessori, even the first idea of kindergarten, things like that, those came out of those similar times, but this one took root and took hold because it had maybe utility at the moment, in the moment, but it stayed largely unchanged.

And that's, I don't think anybody could argue that's not to the detriment of the generations that have come before. One of the things I hear often is, well, I went to a school like this and I turned out fine. And first of all, no, you probably didn't. Yes, and is it the thing that we're doing to say, we want to institutionalize the limit of potential, of reaching potential.

It's not, did you do find us, what could you have done if people knew, saw, and understood the gifts and abilities that you could bring to the world? So you, if you're in our school, you'll see a school that's not run by adults. So how many students about? So we could have one studio, say, elementary studio that has maybe 30 learners and one adult.

And that's a good thing. The more adults that get into the classroom, we say, the worse the experience gets. And that's for kids how old, that ratio? That that's about six and a half to around 11. Okay, so you have 30 kids from six and a half to 11 in one room. Yep. And there's one adult in there. Yes.

Okay, what's the adult doing? So the adult is what we call a sacratic facilitator. So they're operating in an inquiry-based fashion. Primarily what they do is we launch every day with a sacratic discussion. And that's where we put young people in the shoes of a hero facing a tough decision or dilemma. And then we provide two choices, AB choices, or maybe more, that are opposed, very opposed to each other. But both could be seen as equally acceptable answers. And then that facilitator, their job is to allow the young people to engage in a discussion

and a debate. We do this for 15 minutes every morning. That's how things start. That's how every day launches that way. It launches intentionally, which is something we can talk about too, is that a bell ringing to start a day is not an intentional launch. Right. Intentual.

Intentual launch. Yes, and so with us, what we do is we say, hey, we're here, maybe the studio is facing something like there's a lack of respect or something like that, or they're up coming to an exhibition that we hold. I'll talk about those. And it's like crunch time. So we'll put them in the shoes of a hero, usually a real hero from history that faced a similar situation with high stakes, discuss and debate, and then

there's two sides to the argument. Oh yes, there's always two sides to the argument. And all the kids from six and a half to eleven participate. Absolutely. Yeah, you know in my in my graduate seminar, what I used to do, as I learned how to run seminars rather than lecturing, because I liked to lecture, and that worked well for me. I would assign a paper to students, they would read it in class, because often they would read it, they'd say they read it, but they wouldn't have.

So they'd read it in class. And then we would derive alternative standpoints from the paper to opposing viewpoints. And I would assign a view point to one group before, another group before, there's usually 16 kids in the class. The other two groups would evaluate and grade and provide feedback. And then we'd go around the room. And I assigned it arbitrarily. And the goal was to form

a group of four and to lay out your argument and then to conduct something approximating and debate with the other team. And it was really useful for the students. It was engaging for them. And they had a chance to lay out their argument and to make it publicly and to learn how to speak publicly. But also to learn that because the sides, so to speak, were assigned arbitrarily, they learned how to understand that there was many things to be said on multiple sides of an argument, right, and then to really put that in place. And that was a very effective model. And so you're doing something like that in the first 15 minutes. First 15 minutes every day. And these why is that the first thing the kids do?

Well, I think, well, one, it's an intentional way to start the day, but I think you have to back up and understand that you know, something I like to say to parents is that, look, young people are embedded in a story and a narrative. They wake up every day in a story. And so, as parents and I think as adults, we should just be very thankful. We get to be a part of the story. It's so much fun to be a part of the story.

And so, when we talk about entering into our school, there's this idea and game-making about the magic circle. The magic circle is essentially, you enter a place. And when you enter that place, the world changes. It's that world. And so our world at the school, we are heavily embedded in stories and narratives. The hero's journey is something that like really is tagging in cataloging the way we operate the school, that you're a young person on a journey to find your calling and change the world. And that's a true calling on your life, and the world needs something of you. And so what we're doing in these,

in these kind of discussions is really embedding them in story, because, you know, can I digress here just for a second? Hey, digress away. So we talk about the idea of building a character or a moral education. And I think that's somewhat of a misnomer, because number one, parents are the primary people that should be helping to impart a moral education. And I think that's somewhat of a misnomer because number one, parents are the primary people that should be helping to impart a moral education on children. But and what role does

this school have? So it's actually very interesting. If you look at the work of Martin Boober, he was, he he talked about in his essay, the education of character. He talked to this idea how he would try to teach character lessons in a classroom. And you'd actually say the opposite would have the effect. It would be that he would talk about how you shouldn't lie. And then you get an essay from a person in the class that was the biggest person that would not tell the truth about how you shouldn't lie.

We talk about how you shouldn't bully the weak and you get the strong one snickering. You say how you can't teach ethics in an ethics class. Yeah. You teach ethics in morals in a number of ways experience relation to others, but also stories. Yeah. And so embedding young people and stories from the start

and the start of the day to let them know, you're here on an important journey. And there's going to be a right and a wrong in the way that you operate. And it's not always that we're doing a discussion like that. But often it can be, how do we treat other people? How do we act with respect? And what do you see when you watch the kids engage in this debate? You have kids from six and a half, you said to 11.

So what would an observer see if he or she was watching this interaction? Oh, this, you know, actually I have a great story to share, Akira the Don, who we both know. He came and visited our school. And his son, Hercules, sat in on some Socratic launches with us. And I brought Akira came back to the office.

We did this big show with him, with learners, and he was a DJ, a world-class example that we brought in, and he was so gracious to come work with us. After Akira went and observed a launch with his son and he came back and I said, hey, what do you think? And he said, it brought a tear to my eye to think that these young people can treat each other with such respect, and that they can disagree so politely, and that they can have their views heard and understood. Why don't the 11-year-olds dominate the six and a half-year-olds? Often they do in the sense of they discuss more. They'll verbalize more. However, if you have been a six and a half-year year old that's been in that position

and you've grown up in the system, you understand that it's to your advantage to help make sure the younger ones have their voice heard as well. And so what you'll see if you observe a credit discussion at Wonder is one we start off with a polarizing topic of two different choices that is embedding them in a story. But we follow what's called the rules of just conduct. And those rules of just conduct are, how do we operate in this credit discussion? So the discussion leader might say, hey, which rules just conduct we want to focus on today?

And it might be listening with our whole body. So it's like, and then they'll hold each other accountable throughout the discussion to say, hey, remember, we promised to listen with our whole body. What does that mean? It means that they're not turning around or they're not paying attention. They're paying attention.

And how do they call each other out on that without that becoming bullying or dominating? It's... See, those are... I think what you'll find is those types of things are a product of a different type of environment. When you're in an environment that's based on mutual accountability and based on peer-to-peer learning and you're building a tribe You see people within the tribe as like not as an enemy or somebody that's

Competing with you but somebody that you're trying to help the whole tribe move up and that's what we do see now I tell parents all the time. Hey, when you have a child that's six and a half or seven just entering into the elementary environment Like in there in a stacratic discussion, they're absorbers. They're observing and absorbing information. It's one of the best ways they learn how to interact in one of those discussions by watching a 10-year-old or 11-year-old in those discussions. Right, and that's interesting too, because the 10-year-old, nine-year-old, 10-year-old, 11-year-old, first six and a half-year-old,

is someone who's close to their proximal zone of development. So, kids tend to hear a worship, kids who are slightly older than them, old enough so that they can appear as a model for their behavior forward. I mean, kids in grade four really admire kids in grade six. They're a little afraid of them. They think they're quite, they're mighty beings. That's the term Larry Arden. He's the president of Hillsdale College used, which I think is quite funny. But you have them in your class.

And so, and I would imagine too, that the 10 and 11 year olds also come to regard themselves as role models for the younger kids, which is a really good responsibility to put on them. So, but they're treating the little kids properly. They're learning how to do that. And you're saying that they do that more or less as a consequence of being embedded in a culture that's promoting exactly that kind of interaction.

Absolutely. And you mentioned that the older ones see themselves as role models. It's not just that they see themselves. They're in positions elected by younger ones to lead. So we have each, in our elementary, it's broken up into squads. And each squad has a squad leader. So each, so the class is broken up into a squad?

Yes, not, not in the during the day. It's just you're, you're a member of the squad. And so you might have a meeting on a Monday. How many people would be in a squad? Around six, something like that. Okay, so you have your little squad. Yeah. And they have meetings. And what do the meetings consist of?

They talk about wins and losses from the week before. What people are hoping. Performance review. Yep, something like that. What you hope that you want to accomplish the next week, maybe are you stuck somewhere that your squad leader can help you in that? So you really, these older learners that have earned it, because remember, they have to get elected by the younger ones in the squad.

Okay. Elected, meaning what? That they're into a group and they elect the leader of the group. And how does that work technically? What is it electrically? Technically the beginning of the year, it looks like they get together and they have a vote, well, the right down, who they want to lead their squad. And there's also a process for impeachment of that squad leader if they're not upholding the promises that they've committed to for the group. And so the younger ones have a voice within there and it also helps to keep tyranny at bay.

Right, so it's so okay. So you've got the beginnings of a democratic polity there and how do the little kids know who to vote for? Well, that's a learning process. Yeah, okay. Because they get to know the other kids. Absolutely. And sometimes it's following somebody that's a little bit older, but you're you are correct in this. It's that they see somebody older them, but it's also that they see somebody they could embody. They're about to be there. I'm going to be that person in that age group at some point pretty soon. And that's a really powerful thing. And is it a goal? Do you think it's honest to say that it's a goal for the little kids to well, obviously, you'd end up as bigger kids, but are your schools running well enough so the little kids

actually would like to be elected as a leader at some point? That's actually a vision rather than something that teachers only dream the kids want. I also, yes, but here's what I say about that. I think it also comes with cognitive development as they move away from social being the work that they do, because younger ones love to play, and they love to be in social groups as other people, school work is not that important to them. If it's gamified, which we do, they love doing it. But as they get older, what happens is they see their peers moving from one studio to the other, and then they start to take on work as their work, so to speak. Like, they really want to, like, accomplish this thing to reach this next level. And then, yes,

it's a right of passage. They see that. And we see this development happen. You know, if you're six, seven, eight-year-old, a lot of your work is social. And a lot of it, and that's what it should be, rather than just academic pushing, pushing academic work onto a young person. And this kind of goes back to the structure of how we operate, and I'll digress a little bit here, is look, part of what got me interested in doing this in the first place was that, I didn't believe that young people should be

in a desk for seven hours a day. I didn't fit in that at all. And so when my son was born, and I heard that question from my uncle, I thought, I don't care what I have to do if I have to move somewhere or start something or what it may be, I am not going to put my children into a system that doesn't understand the gifts and abilities I have just because they don't fit on the conveyor belt. And so at our school, when you look at that, young people have the freedom to work with their peers.

They have the freedom to choose the work that they'd like to do. Also, they have the freedom to be distracted as long as they're not distracting other people. They can exit the room for a while if they need to be distracted. And I think there's this whole idea and education in the elementary, especially, of young people are so distractable. Well, it's like we're thinking that, okay, we don't understand that the prefrontal cortex has a protracted maturation.

You can't force development in that way. Distractable if they're bored stiff. Yes. You know, kids can concentrate on something for a very long period of time if they're interested in it. Absolutely. So the distractability, and this is the case

for human beings more generally, is if you see a pronounced trend across a number of people, the first thing to presume is there's something situational driving it, rather than something temperamental. And so you might say, well, little kids are distractable. It's well, maybe it's because they're bored to death in the conventional classroom. And I would say that's particularly true of active boys.

Okay, so we've talked a little bit about squads and we've talked a little bit about studios. You started talking about what happens first thing in the morning. Okay, so the kids have a discussion and they're trying to iron out a complex moral conundrum and they're doing that as a consequence of socratic dialogue. And there's an age-graded or what, there's a group of kids that spans quite an age and the older

kids help lead the younger kids and they take responsibility for it. And the little kids have something to look forward to as they grow up. And so that's the first 15 minutes of class. So what happens, what happens next? Let's continue walking through the day. We break the Scratic discussion. And then though the schedule is posted on the board. So there's different levels of controls, we say. Things that the guides have control over and things the learners have control over. So we put a schedule out, but we're not in charge of enforcing the adherence to that schedule.

They mutually enforce that. So the next thing you'd walk into is core skills. On Mondays, we open the day with a meeting with the mentor. So each young person in elementary has a mentor from the middle or high school that's been elected based on kind of exemplifying some of the traits that it means to be at wonder. And so on Monday, they have a meeting with that mentor. And that mentor is asking questions like,

hey, what got you most excited last week? What were you really proud of accomplishing? What do you hope to accomplish this week? Are there any social dynamics or things like that going on that we can talk about, things like that? So they have- How old are the mentors? They're off, gosh, from 12 to 16 right now. Mm-hmm. So they're pretty young are the mentors? They're off gosh from 12 to 16 right now. So they're

pretty young, old enough to do this, but pretty young. And your experience is that they do a credible job at that? They do an incredible job at that. It's, it's that one, they use a system. So they've gotten together as we've put this this mentor program together, they've gotten together, say, what are the questions we should ask? Like what? They've gone together program together, they've gotten together to say, what are the questions we should ask? Like what? They've gone together. They've got together figured this out. They'll run those things by us,

but unless we see some glaring issue, which we don't, because even if we saw an issue, we'd like them to test it and come to that transformation on the right. Right, yeah, yeah. So yeah, they'll meet with the mentor on Monday. And one on one. One on one.

And then they break after that mentor meeting, the how long is the meeting? It's usually 10 to 15 minutes. That's okay. And they do that once every week with the mentor. Every week. And it's setting your eyes to the horizon. What are you here to accomplish?

What would you like to do this week? And I often tell parents that goal setting is an interesting thing because at age seven, the proper time horizon for a goal is likely this afternoon. Yeah, right. What am I saying? Well, that's a very, that's worth driving home, is this the younger the kid, the shorter the future time

horizon. Yes, right. And then we watch this move up when you're entering middle school, they can accurately plan their entire year. What do I want to accomplish in reading, writing, math, quests, things like that for the year? And it starts. Your kids can do that. Yes. It starts because we start instituting this idea math, quests, things like that for the year. And it starts. Your kids can do that.

Yes. It starts because we start, in between this idea of, hey, we're here to accomplish something. And what is that thing we'd like to accomplish? And the mentors really are. I wonder how tight the relationship is between prefrontal cortical maturation and length of time horizon.

I bet it's pretty tight. You know, well, it's complex, right? To calculate yourself across an expanding horizon of time. And it means the replacement of motivation based on basic motivational states, like hunger and thirst, temperature regulation, desire for play, all of that, which are impulsive motivations. It's the replacement of that with a higher order vision where all those competing demands are integrated right, integrated across time. That parallels the movement from say sub-cortical dominance to cortical dominance, something like that. So, you guys are facilitating that. Okay, so they

meet with their mentors and well, now we're an hour into the day. What happens next? Maybe 30 minutes into the day. Maybe 30 minutes. So next they go into their core skills work. And this core skills work is we use adaptive platforms like for math. You could use Khan Academy, Beast Academy, something like that. We're reading Beast Academy.

It's a similar program to Khan Academy. It's functions in a little bit. Who set that up? You know, I'm not sure who set up Beast Academy. But the point there is that some learners like using Con, other learners like using Beast. Okay, and they're adaptive. What does that mean?

It means that as you get into them, like so they can see where are you struggling? What areas you're struggling with, and they'll serve you more of those types of problems, and also like with Connacademy. And I say this to parents often, I don't know that there's anybody that's had a larger impact on math in the world than South Khan. Yeah, right.

I walked you that a little bit. Well, just I think there's 50 million active users, and maybe that's an old statistic. But he's essentially built a platform to allow for the complete self-direction of math learning. Yeah, that's such a good deal. It's unbelievable. And in every each problem that you get, there's a video related to how to solve it with Salcon talking about how to work through a problem like this. And I tell people, well, you can pause that person and you can rewind that person. I mean the dynamic is so much different than a traditional classroom in that way and One thing I hear from people is that a Lot of elite private schools are actually assigning Khan Academy his homework

And I say well, it's only a matter of time before we see the actual redundancy there. Right. It's like we're kidding and so So yeah, so you might do Khan Academy or Beast, there's Reflex Math and there's different math programs. Yeah. We have it that when you're doing a unit test, for instance, to check proficiency, whatever platform you do your practice on, you check out on Khan. And so there's a way to do that

is your standardized indicator. Correct. And so how do you think your students are doing on the mathematical front? I guess you know this. Yes. How are they doing on the mathematical front? I guess you know this. Yes. How are they doing on the mathematical front? Well, I say overall they're doing quite well.

Now, it's varying, right? Because at the younger ages, we don't operate anything that would equate to a kindergarten college preparatory environment. I have a, I say our goals for our elementary school are very simple and they're two things. Love learning and learn to get along with other people. Master those, love coming to school every day, and learn how to work well in a tight and a try with other people.

And so the reason we say that is, if you took the whole corpus of elementary school work of what needs to be accomplished, it's actually not that much work, relatively speaking, if you're at the right developmental age. So you can spend time learning how, learning the important work of how do I get into a flow or how do I find something I love,

how do I remove distractions, things like that. You can spend that time, we have systems help with this and still be fully on track, so to speak, with doing core skills work. Mm-hmm. So, do you have any idea how your students at any given age are performing, let's say, in the mathematical realm?

Because that's quite easy to quantify compared to students in a typical public school environment? Yeah. Well, here's what I say, we don't talk about this much just because, you know, at Wonder we do one standardized test a year. It usually starts around age nine, something like that. And we give no administrative support for it. We don't tell anybody it's happening.

Show up one day, doing a test. For our data that we see for the elementary age, it's around two and a half gradals above where they should. Okay. Are your kids selected on the basis of income or IQ? Neither. We do have tuition. However, we really try to,

when it comes to selection, it's much more for the younger ages, based on do the parents understand what type of school we are? Are they wanting to go on a journey that has triumphs and hardships? Do they really understand what they're getting into? Do you think that you have reasonable coverage across the socioeconomic spectrum, or you tilted more towards middle class and upward?

Well, I would say that I think any school that charges tuition is likely tilted a bit more towards middle class. However, we have people that are social workers, journeyman carpenter, many families in the school would fall working class. Yes, and it's a stretch to pay tuition, but they see the value in what it is, and they say, they understand that one of the biggest responsibilities decisions will make as parents is how and where we're going to educate our children. Once you understand that, you can't, once you see it, you can't unsee it. It's sort of like, I will do, I've had parents say to me, I can't, once you see it, you sort of can't unsee it. Yeah.

And it's sort of like, I will do, I've had parents say to me, I don't care if I need to take a second job. Right. I will find a way to pay the tuition. Right. Now, how much is the tuition? Our tuition is $10,000 a year over 10 months.

So it's roughly $1,000 a month. Mm-hmm. And does that actually cover your expenses? Yes. And, okay, so that's worth highlighting. Yes. So the cost of the education that you're providing Yes. Okay, so that's worth highlighting. Yes. So the cost of the education that you're providing the kids is how much a month?

The tuition is around $10,000 per month. Yeah. Right. We give them a few per year. Per year. Sorry. For $10,000 per year. Yes.

Okay. So you know that in the New York state, the average cost per student per year is $39,000. Yes. Right. So you can do it for a quarter of that. I think that we could actually do it for around, our projection right now is that our all-in costs when we're fully enrolled about 130 learners will be up $4,500 a year per learner.

That's why I would be interesting. The metric you need from a measurement perspective, because you are selecting your students to some degree based on parental interest in education and their ability to pay. So you're gonna be tilting somewhat up the IQ and socioeconomic scale and probably tilting it up the conscientiousness scale, a priori.

The real metric would be how fast your students are learning compared to comparable students in a public school system. Very difficult, very difficult metric to establish. So I'm not being skeptical of this. It's just very interesting to derive performance measures and that's a difficult thing to do. So. Well, I would say there might be a difference in thinking,

especially in elementary school for us, and that if you took a learner from our school at maybe seven or eight years old, and tried to map them with an elite college preparatory school, you might find that our learner is behind on certain areas compared to theirs. That's not a bad thing. It's because children need to be allowed time to be children, and they're not machines to absorb information. Yeah, yeah. Well, that's also the, that's a problem with measurement.

It's like if your only measurement rubric is standardized testing, which is generally the only reliable and valid objective measure, there are things that are important that you're not measuring that are hard to measure. So, for example, it would be very useful to measure maturity if you could figure out how to measure it or if you could measure pro-social behavior. You can do that using teacher ratings of pro-social behavior, for example, peer ratings. So you could derive that, but then you'd need a standardized sample of the same ratings from other schools to compare yourself with and the probability that you'd been able to drive that is pretty much zero. So, well, you can also look at it this way, that you could compare yourself to another school, or if you get down to the individual learner level,

you could compare yourself to yourself that was rated before. Yeah, well, that would be the right way. And that's the way we do that. Yeah, so we'll do that with end-of-week surveys, and it's warm, cool, warm feedback for other learners in the studio, end-of-s of session 360 surveys where you're rating people. Oh, yeah. So you're using three. And those are using peer ratings. Absolutely. Those are posted publicly. So, oh, yeah, it's not who said it, but maybe it makes here's how how each person, like the comments people had.

And so how does that? How do, okay, that's interesting. So how did the kids who are downgraded in a given week, let's say, respond to that? Because they're being publicly evaluated. So what's the justification for that? And have you seen that go wrong? Is there anything that concerns you about that approach? Well, I think if you first start by understanding that we spend a lot of time building the tribe,

so in general, people are polite and respectful towards each other, but they might say that let's take my son for instance. Hudson was distracting me numerous times this week. Okay, if that's one thing on the survey that he was distracting, and these are the types of things that you'll see. If there, we don't see malicious comments or something like that. We see, hey, no trolls. Yes, we don't have a troll-free environment.

Yes, troll-free environment. We don't see things like that. We see Hudson was distracting me this week from this. And if that comes up one time, that could be noise. Yeah. But if Hudson is going through, and he sees four times, people mentioned how he was distracting them. Yeah.

Then it's like looking at that and saying a reflection point. It's like, hey, I'm just using a little tribal feedback. Very useful tribal feedback. Yeah. And we put in time using socratic dialogue and examples of how to give feedback. Like, let me give a quick example of feedback. So when we first started the school about half a decade ago, we had a number of learners that came in from traditional school, and maybe they were 10, 11, somewhere in there.

And our school year is broken into sessions. They're four to six weeks long. They have a quest that's like, you know, we put them in a simulation or they're solving a big problem or something like could be architecture, feature of farming, they're doing the American Revolution. And those are the afternoons every day. I'll get to that. But, okay. And at the end of that quest, there's a public exhibition. And the public exhibition is parents, grandparents, family members coming in and you're on stage, and this starts roughly at age seven,

where you're presenting in front of all these people. You make sure the kids speak loudly enough so everyone in the audience can hear. Audience feedback has made that happen. Yes. We actually had a parent offer to buy. I used to go to my kids' presentations at their elementary school.

They'd be all these kids on stage, and they were all mumbling so quietly that people, even in the first row of the gymnasium, couldn't hear a damn word they were saying. And everybody in the bloody gym was supposed to sit there for two hours pretending that this was acceptable. And while the kids on the stage were pretending to talk and the teachers were pretending to evaluate, painful to say the least.

I had a parent at school, Jamie, he, that was happening and he said, I'll buy you a small PA system in this room and we bought it, but that was soft. So yes, they get on stage, they speak, we record that. And then on Friday, so that happens on the last Thursday of a session. On Friday, they get into a circle, a scratch discussion, and they give each other warm, cool, warm feedback

on how they did. What's something you did well? What's something you could improve? What's another thing you did well? The learners that first came in from traditional schools called that Friday Friday, because it was so hard to hear feedback. And when you come from an environment where basically there's only two grades anymore.

There's A and not A. That's basically what there is now. When you come from that environment and you hear you didn't do perfect or didn't do exactly well, well, I just failed. And so we give them the option of, hey, you could get written feedback or you could get verbal feedback. The wrong choice in there is written feedback because you don't have the context of the kindness of the person giving it to you. Right, right. But they elected that for a little bit until they went back. And so learning, I would say, a very important lesson in life

is how to give and take the feedback. You can incorporate that in what your destructive feedback is. Yes, right. And so in elementary, when they're learning to give the weekly survey, it might be that we start off with a drop-down menu. You're selecting a different learner than a drop down.

Like, is the issue you had somewhere in here? And it's like a pre-written, hey, Hudson was distracting today. I'm sorry, Hudson. You were not sure. Yeah, poor Hudson. Yeah, poor Hudson. Now this is there for the eternity. Yes, for eternity.

Or they can write their own feedback if it's something specific. So that starts at a very young age, this idea of tribal reinforcement. How do we operate in here? Do we have an ethos of how we operate? I'll tell one other anecdote about that. We've learned that school like ours, we cannot re-fruit. We can't go out and say,

hey, would you come to our school? The reason is you have to be looking for what we're offering. You have to believe in anything. I think that's true when you ever, almost whenever you do anything with anyone, it's so much better to have someone come looking than to go sell.

Yes, exactly. I made what I would consider maybe a mistake saying, I met these learners and I thought, gosh, their parents were amazing. I thought they'd do a great job. We invited them to apply to the school. And that was a hard lesson I learned. But one of the most important lessons there was that these learners came in and I often say there's two behaviors we can't incorporate as a school. One would be a blatant disrespect for other people. Yeah know, there'd be manipulation or lying. So that's anti-social behavior.

Yes, and I don't mean that you get into a conflict. We have conflicts arise all the time. And I'll talk about how we resolve those. But these orders came in the school. And for various reasons, they were highly disrespectful, things like that. The tribe came to me in my office one day. And it's usually the older girls.

They really value order. And I think for some reason what we see is a lot of the older girls take leadership roles, somewhat younger than some of the younger boys would. And they came to my office and they said, hey look, here's all the things we've tried. Here's what's going on. They just don't understand, we don't do those things here. Right, right. And I said, hey, look, here's all the things we've tried. Here's what's going on. They just don't understand, we don't do those things here.

Right, right. And I said, guys, what you're saying is that there's a way that we do things here. That's an ethos. We have something that defines us. First off, that's amazing. How amazing is it that we have that? In second, we troubleshoot different ways

that we could solve this. Ultimately, learners weren't fit for the school. Well, one thing that's worth knowing on that front, by the way, is that if antisocial proclivities are not rectified by the age of four, they're virtually impossible to rectify after that, no matter what you do, right? Anti-social behavior proclivities are more stable than IQ.

And psychologists have tried everything you can possibly imagine to rectify anti-social behavior proclivities with either zero or negative success, right? So your observation that if you have kids who are tilted in the overtly trouble-making direction, and that would be associated with that overt disrespect for others, the probability have kids who are tilted in the overtly trouble making direction. And that would be associated, say, with that overt disrespect for others. The probability that you're going to be able to do anything about that is extraordinarily low, right? It's one of the most dismal fragments, aspects of the clinical psychology literature,

because psychologists have thrown everything they had at the remediation of anti-social behavior. The only, and with no effect, the only exception I've ever seen to that is the work of someone named Dan Olways, who went on an anti-bullying campaign in the Scandinavian countries and managed that quite effectively.

But he did that really through a cultural transformation of the schools, rather than a focus on the individual behavior of any given students. So, anyways. All right, so let's go back to the days. So, we've gone through the socratic dialogue, we've gone through the meetings with the mentors, and I think that's pretty much where we stopped

in terms of progressing through an actual day. And then you are going into what we call self-directed courses. Oh, yeah, we talked about Khan Academy a bit there too. And so you're going to self-directed course skills. And now I think the important thing to understand about a school like ours, and this is where my, what I mentioned earlier is so important, is the system is so much different. And our school is largely ran by systems and recipes that we hand off to learners.

So for instance, people would say, well, you're saying that the guide doesn't have the traditional role in the classroom, that they are not there for telling learners what to do. How do you get learners to do work? What what and so, well, number one, if something's gamified and it's fun, they want to do it. And they actually really enjoy doing it. So even something something's gamified and it's fun, they want to do it. And they actually really enjoy doing it.

So even something that's gamified like Khan Academy or some of these other platforms, it's enjoyable for them to do. And it's enjoyable for them to watch their progress moving up. And I think it's a progress towards the goal that really gets them, you know, maybe it's dopamine or something like that, that triggers. But also within the school, you think of the school as like being embedded in a game, we have what are called freedom levels.

And so within the studio, you have the ability to earn your freedom by solely by the work that you do. It's not subjective. It is, you earn this, a guide cannot take this away from you. And so for instance, say you move up 1% in Khan Academy in your grade level.

And the grade level is based on where are you at right now, and you'll make goals towards where do you want to be. When you move up 1%, you earn 20 points. So this is the game. If you earn 300 points within a week, the next week, you're at the highest freedom level. That means that next week, you get to choose what you work on when you work on it and where you work on it.

Within our sort of life. Yes, very much so. And so, but also if you say, hey, if you're distracted for a week, something like that, you're getting less work done. You might be on freedom level one, and that would look like, hey, you have a desk, and there's what the schedule would look like, hey, you have a desk, and there's what you do, what

the schedule would look like on the board. But what we find is that 80 to 90% of the learners are on freedom level two or three. They want the additional freedom. It's enough of incentive just to say, I have the agency over my time in the day. I know the steps I need to take to get it. They've agreed and helped develop this system. It's been a part of what they've done. And so it's how you incentivize, maybe work or hard work.

But the true answer, especially the younger you are, is that gamification of work is enough. You have fun game to play. And I often ask people, talk to people, if they say, hey, the studio is getting a bit disorderly. It happens. I would ask, well, what's is getting a bit disorderly, it happens. I would ask, well, what's wrong with the game that we're setting up? How can we make the game more fun to play?

So that's of course, still. Okay, so if I objected, well, life isn't going to be fun. So how do you know you're not setting up a micro environment for children that isn't representative of the macroenvironment to which they'll have to adapt. No, I mean, I enjoy the descriptions of the programs that you're putting forward and I would love to believe that that was all true

without any reservation, but I'm trying to allow myself as many skeptical thoughts as I can possibly manage. And I am curious about this. I mean, I know that Khan Academy has had a lot of success in their mathematics training. And I know they use a gamified approach, but that what that really is is a carefully designed system of incentives rewards that actually match

the motivational structure of the learners. You could call that gamified, but it's actually just adapted properly for learning. But do you feel that, do you feel that you are preparing the kids for the realities of the real world and what evidence do you have that that might actually be the case? When you say reality is a real world, can you specific on that?

Like what? Well, that's a good objection actually. Well, let's say that 30, 40% of your graduates at, you know, after high school go and get just an ordinary job, construction job, job in a restaurant, a job in a local store, a job. are they going to be fit for those positions given the experiences that they've had in your school? Well, I think we're maybe prematurely asking the question, and here's why I said that, elementary is very different than middle, which is very different than high school. So there is a progression upwards.

So if I gave you the goals of studios this ahead of time, saying, if you're under middle school, it's this, love learning and learn to get along with people. So elementary is by design about developing a love of learning. Why is that? It's because when you get into middle school, the, if I had to put one set in school, I'll be learn to work hard for three hours a day, which is hard for many adults, if what they're on a single cell. So you're inculcating a more conscientious focus increasingly as they progress. Absolutely.

All right, okay, well, that's a very good answer. All right, all right. And so you've built that in where it's developmentally appropriate. You said your goal is, yeah, actual on task work for three hours a day. In four, right. You can have a wonderful life. If you can work focused on one thing for three hours a day.

Yes. And that's actually a very, very high level of attainment to manage that. Yes, and they do it in middle school. And I'll talk about how and why. But yes, the design of elementary school is more exploration, love of learning, social, learning to get along with other people. And I'll give you an example of that about, in this applies to the real

world and success in the real world. At a normal school, if you find that you have maybe a continuous conflict with another learner, maybe at a large school, one of the most common things is they'll separate those learners in different classrooms. But that's not what you can do in life is that every time you have a conflict with somebody that you're a big conflict, that you're gonna just remove that person from your life. Well, it also doesn't necessarily eliminate the conflict. It doesn't.

It actually maybe does the opposite from forcing the negative behavior. And so, at wonder what happens is, if you have a conflict with another learner, either a learner can call a conflict resolution session. And you can have a 30-minute cool down period if emotions are high. Yeah. Yeah. They'll do it. So what happens is they will find a mentor, what we call a peacemaker, from the middle school or high school. Somebody that's earned their chops, so to speak, helping

to make peace in the school. And they sit across to each other at a three-foot table with the mentor on the side, and the mentor has a formal conflict resolution sheet. These happen two, three times a day, that because conflicts happen in society, that's just the way it is. And so the mentor will read off, it starts like this. Why are we here?

We're here because heroes solve problems they don't run from problems. And then it goes into what you would consider like a speaker listener exercise. Each person gets a chance to be heard, have it repeated back to them, advise versa, they negotiate a bit in there. And at the end of it is, what's one concrete item the other person could do to make the situation better? That's very good. And that takes negotiation by the way. Absolutely. And that is negotiating. Yes. Because maybe something you propose

the other person could do wouldn't be something they think they actually can do. Yeah. But Jordan, we see this happen with six and a half year olds that are learning to get their voice, they'll call a conflict resolution on some of its older than them. And they know that one of these mentors in middle school or high school are going to give them a fair shake. And they get to have their voice heard. Sometimes it's an intimidating set of circumstances, but one of the most fulfilling things you can see in a situation like that is a young person learning to know that if they can voice

what how they're feeling properly, that they can be heard in issues and their life can be addressed. Yeah, well, and you're moving the kids towards reconciliation. Absolutely. Yeah, conflict is inevitable, and reconciliation is possible, but it has to be negotiated.

And so the strategy that you laid forward there is very wise. Yes. Okay, so back now, so the kids are concentrating on exercises like Khan Academy. That's on the mathematics front. What else are they learning in elementary school? Deep books, they're going into deep books, badge books, and so they'll, part of the reading.

So they'll be selecting books to read that they can earn a badge for. So how do they learn to read? So you, usually in the younger studio, so we have a Montessori studio that starts before this, that's where they generally learn to read. One of the items of success in our elementary studio is a basic prof starts before this. That's where they generally learn to read. One of the items of success in our elementary school studio is a basic proficiency in reading.

So you either come in knowing how to read or will work with you on programs like Lexi or something like that to build your reading proficiency. And so these are programs that are external again, like Cahn that have been designed to help kids run through a phonics training program. How do they teach them to read? Yes, basically.

It's in Lexia. Yeah, Lexia is one of those that we use. It's reading comprehension or just basic reading. And you're impressed with these programs? Well, I've seen them work very well. I think ultimately, young people want to learn. And I think something that's also very true about this whole discussion is that there's something very different between teaching and learning and they're two completely different things in that sense. I don't know that it's true. I actually think it is true that all learning is self-learning, self-motivated learning. And so, yes, at the younger ages, getting into the exploration of learning, maybe three through

six age in the Montessori City that we have, that's where they first get introduced to reading. And then they'll, as they get through middle school, they'll really master that level of reading. But they'll start with books that are appropriate for their age level and for their competency and reading. How did you identify those books? Well, it's not necessarily up to us. We select

a library of books, but they can pitch any book they'd like. If they'd like a book that they to have in the library. So, okay, I see. So you crowdsource that, probably. Absolutely. And here's the reason why you have to look at what is the goal of reading? The goal of reading is to help somebody develop a love of reading. And the way you develop a love of reading is by reading what you love. And so one surefire way to make sure that somebody doesn't like to read is to force them to read things that they're not interested in. And what I found young people especially learn from this is if you're forcing them to do this work, something that they don't want to do, they might do it because maybe

that they're pressured to get the grade or something like that. Use their memorize it rather than learn it. Yeah. But they often hate it. They do resent it. Yeah. And they also resent the adult that makes them do it. Yeah. Well, and then they'll resent the whole damn enterprise. Yes. You know, because you'll have kids. I remember I had friends like this who said, I hate reading. It's like, well, you know, that's a terrible thing for a child to say because to say you hate reading is the same as saying I hate exploring, I hate thinking, I hate discussing. Right. And but I mean, they were very honest in their hatred and the reason they hated it is

because what they weren't taught how to do it well. And then they were forced into reading things that they didn't want to bring. Here's something I remember from grade eight, I think this pissed me off more than anything that ever happened to be in junior high. And there were a lot of things that happened in junior high that I wasn't very happy about. And this was probably the top of the list. So I was a very fast reader as a kid. And I could generally read all the books for the year in English class in the first two or three days.

And I would usually do that by reading those books behind a textbook in all the books for the year in English class in the first two or three days. I would usually do that by reading those books behind a textbook in all the other classes. I remember telling my teacher, I don't know, three days into the bloody English course, that I had read all the books and her answer was, read them again. I thought, you know, that's really a bad answer because what I just announced to you was that I already did all the work for the year this week. And I was basically asking you, you know, could you give me some more books? And by the way, this is a school. So you'd think that would be a place where that question could be reasonably asked. And the answer was, do the work you've already done again? And make sure that you don't

have any enjoyment whatsoever while you're pursuing it. Plus, shut the hell up and don't bother me again. Right? Yeah. I should say in that same school, I had a librarian there, Sandy Nautley, who was the wife of the socialist leader in town in the MLA. And I used to go to the library and she would give me books and good books. And she taught me a lot because she'd give me book, and I'd read it, man, I'd tell her, and she'd give me another book. And that was unbelievably useful.

That was self-guided learning in some ways. And so I really loved that. My dad too, he was teaching grade six at that point. He used a system called SSRI, which was Sassane, Sassane, Sassane, Silelland, Self-Reinforced Instruction, something like that. I haven't got the acronym exactly right, but it was grad graded texts in a file folder of increasing difficulty with self-evaluation, and you could arrest that through that at your

own rate. God, I love that. I would have had a fine time in school. You had to feel empowered by that, too. Well, plus there was a challenge constantly. Yes. And I could find the edge of my reading ability and start to play with that instead of having to read things that, you know, I'd figured out a read like four years before. So it was gay, I suppose that was an early form of gamification, but it isn't really gamification. It's just using the processes of incentive reward properly. Well, and that's a crucial part of gamification, is that, right? Is incentive reward

incentive, it's proper incentivization. So maybe at a young age, it is gamification in some ways. Maybe if that's like how... Well, a game is actually an activity where the incentive rewards are lined up properly. That's how you define a game. So it, it, it, it isn't like a game exists outside that. It's that a game is a micro environment that's structured so optimally that people will engage in being there voluntarily. Yes. Right. And there's a huge point of engaging being there. Volunteers. Yeah. Absolutely. Yeah. Well, you know, there's a, there's a moral rule in, in some ways, that emerges out of that, which is that if you haven't set up the environment so that the participants will engage in it voluntarily, you set up a pathological environment.

It's either tyranny or chaos. Those are the alternatives. Yeah, I wonder we say something like this. Look, if there's an issue in the studio involving two to three learners, okay, well likely they're going through something and they have a lot of energy or they're not interested in what's happening right now. If it's 50% of the studio, what are we doing wrong with the game? How are we making the game wrong? Yeah. But about reading this, I think this is very important. I had a parent that was interested in the school say to me, you know, well, how do you determine what they must read? And he was very

much in the classical education side, which I have a lot of, like, I really enjoy a lot of that. And he said, well, you're telling me that they don't have to read these great books. They're not forced to read these great books. And I went through this idea of reading and developing a love for reading. And also that I would ask, maybe pose the question so like this, what's more important? The four years, maybe high school that you're engaged in reading deep books, making sure they do that,

or making sure they love reading so much at the next 60 years is filled with enjoyable reading. Right, right, right. And I think that's maybe so. Well, when people will, if you teach them to love reading, they will advance in their reading to their zone of proximal development, and they'll read the most complex books they can manage, assuming they have enough knowledge to find

those books. People will do that automatically. And so you might say, well, you should instill a love of the classics. And what that would mean optimally is that you inform people that great books exist, and you show them where they are. But you pretty much have to let them come to those books on their own. And they may not be able to do that, well, maybe, maybe ever in life, because great books tend to be relatively complex on the intellectual front, but they may have

to come to that obliquely. Like, in a lot of behavioral psychologists will give their client self-help books. And intellectuals in the popular culture are, they have derogatory attitudes clients self-help books. And intellectuals in the popular culture are they have derogatory attitude towards self-help books. I mean, the whole genre is like, well, that's self-help. It's like, well, first of all, what's your objection to that exactly? You don't think people should be trying to help themselves? And then I don't know if you noticed,

but that's actually introductory philosophy, moral philosophy, that's what a self-help book is. And you might say, well, I have contempt for it because it's introductory. It's like, well, where the hell do you expect people to start? Most people don't even read, right? And then when you see people who are willing to take a step into the domain of self-help, it means they've actually progressed in their reading enough so they're starting to contemplate the elementary ideas of moral philosophy and even theology.

It's like you should do everything you can to reward that. Right. So an awakening of sorts for them. And it's like that's what. That's what. Who are we to say at the point at which they're awakening is not the point that they should be at. It's like they're in a journey right now and this is where they should be because they've elected for that to be the place and how can we criticize them for not being in a different place.

Yeah, well, you do that by proclaiming your moral superiority on hypothetical intellectual grounds. Yes, it's a pretty pathetic game. So okay, so you've got your kids, you're instilling in them a love of reading, at least in principle, by teaching them to read. So, you know, that kids actually tend not to enjoy reading, so to speak, until they can read a phrase at something like a glance, and they can start reading for meaning rather than to have to struggle with word comprehension. And so part of the trick with teaching kids, of course, is to get them past the point of stumbling over words so that it becomes as easy to read as it does to talk or to listen.

Let's say. But you've solved that problem to some degree by using these sophisticated reading education programs that are analogous in some ways to the Khan Academy. Yeah. I would say that's part of the solution. When I say solution, it's just we're providing them the tool to be able to unlock something that they really want. And they want to know how to read.

They want to be able to get a book off a shelf to be able to unlock something that they really want. And they want to know how to read. They want to be able to get a book off a shelf, to be able to read it. But I think also, you have to rethink what you're thinking of as reading. Why can't a comic book be there as reading? Why can't a graphic novel be there as reading? And it can be, and the younger ones love those. And so they can develop that love of reading by something that like we would think, well, where's the content value and something like this? And, but in many of these are great stories, not all graphic. But, well, they're not popular novels unless they have a, they're not popular literary endeavors, unless they have the capacity to grip the attention of the reader,

and they're not going to grip the attention of the reader, and they're not going to grip the attention of the reader unless they tell a good story. So I think that is self-selecting. I mean, a story won't elicit attention from a reader if it isn't doing something for them. Yes. So to the process of the school, so yes, well, engaging reading. So what does the reading process look like?

On the number one, they'll pick a book that would constitute a batch book. Something that they would, is maybe at their level of development, on the cost of being difficult, right? Something that also maybe is interesting, possibly associated with their hero's journey, something like that. But this could be a who-is book or something like that at the younger ages. Then they'll read that book and write a review on that book. And then they'll read that review during a secradic discussion,

or after one completes before they break the circle. The younger ages, that's it. You read it, you write the simple review on it, the review, it doesn't have a word count like requirement, doesn't have anything like that. The idea is that you've read a book, you've written and you've answered three or four questions on it. What was your favorite character?

What surprised you the most, things like that? And then you presented in front of the tribe. Then as you get into the older studios, they'll actually vote on your book review. Did it meet the requirements? Do we feel like they met, like, really understood the plot line or something like that? Or, and also, is there evidence that they didn't read the book? So there's some self-reinforcing here. And they can, if they deny the book, the book review, so to speak, it's not, oh, it's done. It's like, hey, address these things and then come back and represent the book.

Yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah. And what this, and then the next book they read for their next badge book, one of the rules is it needs to be more difficult in the last. So maybe they're not ready to do a badge book review for a while again, because they're still working on reading proficiency. They have a goal, the book they wanna do next, but they're not ready to do a badge book review for a while again because they're still working on reading proficiency They have a goal the book they want to do next, but they're not quite there yet And so they're striving for something there. Well, what this tears up to if you look at I'll give you a quick story about what I

walked into on the middle school one day and Mind you this is all from the system of not forcing reading working to make reading fun and So I walked into the middle school one day and it was during a time in the schedule called drop everything and read. And so it's just, we're all, they're all reading. I saw three girls and one boy sitting in, we have kind of like, it's more, it looks like a shared workspace, something comfy like this. They're, they're sitting in different shares reading. And the books that I saw them reading were Atlas Shrugged, the boys who challenged Hitler, the Da Vinci Code, and Unbroken.

And this is all without us saying you need to read any of these books. This is from them going to the shelf. And when you get in middle school, a deep book is a book that's one in a war to change the world in some way. And that's how you pitch a book that you'd like to be a deep book. And so by giving them options in selection, they wanted to challenge themselves and they wanted to read about like heroic stories. And that was, that's just something that, when I walk in and see something like that, I'm thinking like, yes, this is the way this

should be, that they're moving up in this progression of excellence or maybe proficiency or something like that. And they're voluntarily choosing to go into these deep stories. All right. So back, how much more content should we cover content process with regard to elementary school? Well, I think one thing I failed to mention at the beginning is our years couched in what I call badge plan. And so a badge plan is at the beginning of the year, you're after a couple of weeks being in the studio,

because we really make the first session. Remember, years are four to six week sessions and we take at least a week break. So we take a four to six week session. And in that first session, a learner will start working a badge plan for the year. And basically what they're doing on their own at first, is saying, this is what I'd like to accomplish

in reading and math and writers work out. Yeah, it works out just starting to envision goals for themselves and how young? This starts at roughly seven years old. Yeah, that's really good. And it's important for parents to know this is that that is not an accurate assessment at seven years old.

It requires like feedback because say, hey, I'd like to accomplish four great olds of math this year. Well, that's a great ambition. But what they'll get is then feedback from a guide and from parents on saying, hey, do we think these are smart goals? And we really use that rubric. That they're specific, measurable. What I really like to focus on is the smart goal goal. Specific, measurable, attainable, relevant, and time bound. Yeah, okay. So, and we're too great. We start, we have a rubric of evaluation for their vision, and that's also peer-evaluated.

Absolutely, and that gives the peer something of value. That's great. Hey, this is really specific that you want to accomplish three gradals of math this year, but is it attainable? Yeah. And they'll walk through like what that could look like. So the beginning of the year,

they set out a badge plan. That badge plan is a signature is put on it by the student, a signature is put on it by the guide once they go over it and say it's it's filled with smart goals and then parents. And that essentially sets the stage. Yes. And that's another thing we need to talk about a little bit is contracts within the studio. But that is one of them that then they have a document that says here's what we've all agreed I'm doing this year. And so if you need to reflect back, they have a plan. They have a plan.

And a goal. And we do a check-in on this halfway through the year, and they can adjust their goals at that point. Did I set two part of goals? Were they too easy? Were did I get all my badge book sons right away? Because I was so focused on the love of reading that I have for a Terry Potter or something like that.

And so they'll have that as their plan. And then at the end of the year, they'll check in on that plan. How did I do? And that is not a graded process. It's an iterative process to get better and better at making goals that you can attain. Yeah, well, right.

It's also a great way of inculcating what the process of coming to self-knowledge, but also acure itself knowledge. We tend to think, especially in our idiot culture, that people are transparent to themselves. I can define who I am. And that's simply not true because you're too complex to be transparent to yourself. And so you're going to have all sorts of delusional ideas, some negative and some too positive about who you are and what you're capable of. And part of the way you modify that, so you come to a realistic appraisal

of yourself is by smacking yourself up against the world and succeeding or failing, but also by encountering other people who go, yeah, I don't think so or who pat you on the back saying good job, right? And so by having kids develop an unrealistic vision to begin with, which is what's going to happen with young kids, because what the hell do they know? And then by modifying that with peer evaluation and guide evaluation, you're also helping the children come to a much more what precise and accurate understanding of who they are and how they can foster their own development. Absolutely.

That's really nice to have. They didn't cultivate it so young. Okay. So the kids have a contract and they develop a goal and the peers give them feedback. They're teacher, they're their guide, their parents. So they're they're coming to more accurate self-evaluation. What's what let's let's turn our attention to middle school and high school. We've concentrated a fair bit in elementary and that's turn our attention to middle school and high school. We've concentrated a fair bit in elementary,

and that's fine. So, lay out the situation in middle school for me. Yeah, and I think just briefly, something I'd say about the reason I think there's a big focus in elementary school, is that most schools in the United States get preschool kindergarten right. Don't take it too seriously,

have a lot of fun, explore the basics, be social. When you get into elementary school, it's like there's a switch that flips. It says, hey, college is coming, school's not fun, homework is here. And so I think what Wunder does is we're able to take that period of childhood and allow it to still be childhood. But there comes a time when you need to like start to move up.

And that's why we say, elementary, love learning, get along with other people. In middle school, work truly hard for at least three hours a day, in flow. But, and then I'll add high school there too, have a tested and vetted idea of what you'd like to do with your life. And so I'll be back integrated into that.

Yeah. With an in elementary or in middle school, you are doing far more, I would say, you're getting, you're still doing some credit launches every day. You have the kind of core work that you're working with. What's the age range for your middle school? It's 11 to 13 somewhere in that range. Okay. It's a bit fluid because in a normal school, the constant is how long you can take to do some work.

The variable is how proficient you are at it. In our school with mastery, the constant is, we master, we work for mastery. The variable is how long it takes you to get that done. And so if it takes you a few months or whatever extra, do that. That's okay. And it works within the system. So they have a similar structure where they're doing morning core skills work afternoon quest.

It's very much built on challenges that are delivered from a guide to the learners and they go through on their own with challenges in Western civilization, with fighters workshop, and they're building that body of work throughout a session, throughout six weeks. The key, if I look broadly at middle school and high school,

the key is that, and this is maybe a thought about a protest against delayed maturation, is that if you look at some people that we really respect in the world, like Da Vinci, you could look at Carnegie, these people sort of practicing at age 12 and 13. They were in the real world, getting real world experience at age 12 and 13. They were in the real world, getting real world experience

at age 12 and 13. And Michelangelo. Michelangelo. And so there's no reason that young people today aren't capable of the same thing. And so one of the defining characteristics of our middle school, as you're working on hard work, and mind you, we have, if done properly at our school, there's no homework at any point throughout the school. This is all done within the time frame so we have at school. The progress for how long are your school days? Roughly 9 to 330. Okay, so standard.

Standard school, yes. And so what you'll start in middle school is your apprenticeship process. So you're starting to confine. You're starting to constrain that. Your state's exploration and elementary as you get into middle school, you're really starting to hone in. And you can work three hours. And so this is also the answer to the question

that I posed earlier, which is how do you make sure that this is aligned with the real world? Yes. And part of your answer is, well, we put kids out in the real world. They're in the real world starting at 11. So starting at 11, you'll get your first apprenticeship. And that apprenticeship starts like this.

And this is something I think is so important, is that one, guides and parents don't secure apprenticeships for our learners. The learners do. We help them with recipes for it. And here's like what a recipe would be. Number one, what do you love? Take things that you've learned in the world,

experiences you've had, experiences you've had in elementary school, where you explored through all these quests that we do in the afternoon. Take all that and develop a list of 10 heroes that you have based on something that you would love to do. You'd love to learn more about. Maybe it's videography. So in elementary, we did this quest on videography. I loved it. In middle school, you'll take that. You'll find heroes in that

field locally. You'll take those 10 heroes narrow down to three. And then from those three heroes, you go through a process of finding their email address. And this is local. This is local. It can be otherwise. You can do it otherwise. That's probably more what somebody might do in high school.

But to start with, those these are welcome. I'll give some examples too, because they're very powerful. You have heroes you narrow down, you find their email address. You have to write an email that will get opened down, you find their email address. You have to write an email that will get opened first, which is not always easy, for busy people. Number two, in that email, you have to make the case for how they've inspired you.

What work have you done to research this person? What do you know about them? And then how can you explain it? You're teaching them how to do a really high-quality job application that is really. Absolutely. If you get one of these, it's like, I've gotten one from a learner in the middle school unexpectedly, who wanted to start a school like ours. That's her journey in life.

And I read it and I was like, there's just no way I could like, like, turn this down. There's just no way I could have done it. But so they're writing an email, one that will get open, two in that email, they're requesting a five minute phone call. In that five minute phone call, they're requesting a 10 minute in-person meeting. And in that in-person. It's very sneaky. Yes, in that in-person meeting,

they're requesting a six-week apprenticeship. And but it's all very genuine. Meaning it's like saying, this is a person that's inspired me in my life. This is something that I want, I have specific things I want to learn from them. And so a couple of examples of that. In our school, we now have high school, our oldest age is 16 right now just because we grow with the learners that are at the older ages.

We don't enroll into high school. You really need to start at the lower ages and work up. You could probably guess why. Yeah, have you tried it? Yes. And what's been your experience. They're too cynical. No, it's happened. Usually a lack of self-motivation. You come into an environment where no adult is telling you what to do every day.

And you've been in an environment where everybody's been telling you all the time. And this is why I tell people about the role of our guide. Is that the reason our guides don't answer questions like they do is that in life, there's not somebody standing over your shoulder all the time giving you answer the things. But the information's at your fingertips

if you know how to properly utilize it and you're motivated to do so. And we know this, kids are doing this every day. They're not doing it for the school work because it's not interesting or fun to them, but they're doing it for the things that they're passionate about in the world on YouTube and things like that.

So for one example, we have a young girl in the school and her grandfather is somebody that works with the wrongfully accused. And at a young age that took hold of her and she's very inspired by that. So at age 11, maybe 12, right in there, she decided she wanted to be an attorney potentially. And so she did this whole process.

And she's went through this process now for three years, I believe, where she's validated this idea that, yes, this is what I wanna do, which by the way, one of the most important takeaways from apprenticeship you could probably have is that I don't want to do this thing that I thought I did.

We've got stories about that too. But she's done that. And now, at age 15, she's participated in jury selections, depos she's done that. And now at age 15, she's participated in jury selections, depositions, these things. She's on the way to be doing the work that somebody that is graduated from college is just starting to do. She's doing that work. And one other example. What sort of feedback are you getting about her from the people she's been apprenticing to? I would say that I have a quick anecdote about that.

Well, one of the girls that is in this studio as well, she wanted to intern apprentice at this pet store. She once worked with animals in a zoo and things like that. She was too young to be hired as an apprentice, but they said, hey, we'll let you shadow. And so she went into shadow. And then, and it was just their personal policy that she couldn't be hired until this age, a certain age. She went and did that. And after, after that next year, they said, we were so impressed by the work that you did that we've changed our policy so that you

can come work here. And I think when you're coming up in this environment and you're learning how to work well with other people, and what these learners say, they understand, is that be happy to do any job. It doesn't matter if you're emptying the garbage cans. Like you're getting into somewhere, and somebody's giving you their time. And you're a powerful thing I might want to say here is,

I think this is a very important point, is that the role of a mentor is an opt-in relationship. I think that's often the confusion with maybe a teacher that's wanting to bring a personal thought into a classroom, is that that's a mentorship relationship, meaning a young person asks you to be a personal thought into a classroom is that that's a mentorship relationship, meaning a young person asks you to be a mentor or seeks you out as a mentor. Otherwise, the job is academic. Parents are sending their kids to school to learn academics. And I think that's what's so powerful is they're electing their mentors here. So the last thing I'll

mention about apprenticeships, because mind you, they started 11 and they'll go all the way through high school and there's a process for this. But the last thing I'll mention is that we had one girl that was an mentioning girl's here. We also have boys that have done great apprenticeships as well. She thought, for sure, I want to be a veterinarian. And she, at 11, interned with a veterinarian, is a surgeon. She loves horses, loves animals.

The first sign of the surgery room and blood couldn't handle it, almost lost it, so to speak. And that was an amazing learning for her at a young age, because when might she learn that otherwise, if maybe it's after undergraduate school, or something like that. And so she knows I still wanna work with animals, I love them, but this direction isn't the precise direction.

What an amazing learning. Right, yeah, yeah, yeah. So that's how we look at apprenticeships in the school. They started age 11. So you're still doing your core skills, type of work, still moving up in our deep books. You're doing chemistry physics biology, much more intentionally, I would say.

So you're doing medical biology and chemistry and we're making it very, very relatable. And then in high school, this is where really kind of everything comes together. So you have a love of learning. You know how to work well with other people. You have the habits of hard work. And now what is it? You've in military, you've also tested this idea in the world.

You've gone out in the world, do things. And so what happens in high schools, what we call the next grade adventure. And the next grade adventure really is, you're declaring after doing three to four years of apprenticing, this is where I fit into the world, this is what I want to do. So you're declaring, you're putting a flag in the ground.

And then with that, you're going on a journey of deliberate work through high school. And that deliberate work is number one, declaring it, saying, this is what I'm gonna do. Number two, you're finding people in that industry and you're doing a minimum of 10 interviews with these people that have done what you would like to do and have inspired you in some way.

And then through that, you're asking them, you know, tough questions, or pretty long interviews that people say yes to, then from there, you're going into deliberate practices of this work. So it could be getting a credential on the work from a third party source. Or it could be,

and the kids figure out how to do this themselves essentially. We have recipes, we hand off to them, and that they engage in this process, absolutely. But there's never a time when adults are going to help you with your interview, or meaning like they're going to be there at the interview with you or anything like that. There's not a time when they're going to help you secure an apprenticeship. And how are the high school kids monitoring themselves? And why does that work? Explain your question. Well, you, we walked through the elementary school situation

where there were kids from six and a half to 11 participating. In high school, the age is what? 14 to 18. And it's the same basic model. The kids are self, the young people are self-monitoring. And did they turn the 14-year-olds, did they turn to the 18-year-olds for mentoring? Is that absolutely.

And it just happens naturally. And they're already accustomed to doing this. You know when you walk into an organization, you can see the culture is way different in this place than it is. That's how it would look. There's times when our middle school, high school guide, will be out of the studio for long periods of time. And they've actually said to him,

he was gone, our middle school high school guide is a stellar individual. And he loves what he does. He was gone for a number of days once, and so I was sort of doing the check-ins with the learners. And when he got back, he said, hey, what did you like and not

like about what was going on? And the response to him was, we actually like it when you work outside of the studio more because it reduces the temptation for us to go to you with a question. It requires us to work together on these items. So yes, it's a more necessity, peer-to-peer accountability and work. So now, have you had students graduate from high school and go on to colleges and universities? Already have you been in operation long enough for that to happen? Our oldest right now is 16, but in our network of schools,

and we're just one school. I only speak for ours. Yes, absolutely. There's been learners that have went up through this same model that have went on to great apprenticeships, go to different types of colleges, start jobs, things like that. Do you have any idea how your kids are doing when they go out of the schools into the actual

world? Well, I think we hear anecdotes about that, about somewhat of what you talked about before, about, hey, there is sort of like, you You're leaving this environment which is basically a civil society. Yeah, that's what we said right right? What's set up there that's governed by learners with appropriate handoffs of systems and recipes and so There's comments about what they see maybe that it's very difficult for people to make decisions like not not them for other people who went through different models. It's a very common thing that we see and like not not them for other people who went through different models. It's a very common thing that we see and and that a lot of the work maybe an undergrad seems like fake work, which we know it is and so those are comments but I think the idea is that they're they've developed agency to broaden to the world and aim towards something that this very

valuable. Yeah, I wonder if your kids are going to be statistically more likely to be entrepreneurs. Right, because my suspicions are that they would have some, I wouldn't say difficult, difficulty fitting into traditional environments, but unwillingness to do so, and the proclivity to set up systems of their own that actually function properly, which is one of the advantages of course of setting up your own school or your own businesses That, yeah, I think that's, that is a, Hey, so if parents were running out of time on this segment, we're gonna flip over to the Daily Wire Plus side momentarily

and I'm gonna walk Zach through some autobiographical reminiscences and talk about how his destiny and his calling came to be, let's say. But let's close this off practically speaking. So a lot of the people who are listening to or watching this are going to be interested in while learning more and also about how they might maneuver so that they can set up a school

like this in their local environment. So what are the practical, what do they need to know practically in order to manage that? Well, I think number one practically, you need to know the type of school and model that this is. We've talked a lot about it here, but being at wonder is a journey for parents and learners.

And my meme of that is, the process that we're actually engaging from a psychological standpoint, a therapeutic standpoint, for parents might be something like differentiation. And because you have to be able to be willing to let your learner succeed and fail. So if you're ready for a journey like that, truly ready for that. Right. So yeah, you're teaching the parents how to let their kids be independent or how fast are that independence? Yeah. That's a good deal. Well, how else will we be able to well, I would say this, when you may, when you set up an environment like this where young

people have agency, if we're taking that agency away arbitrarily, we're not really helping them develop the agency. Absolutely. And so you have to give them sort of like a space that's theirs, that we all agree the journey you're on. We've made a badge plan as well. Now, you go off and accomplish this.

We believe in you. And I often say to parents that something I'll say to my kids is, look, this is your journey. It's not my journey. Yeah, right. Yeah. I am just so glad to be a cheerleader on the sideline. And I cannot wait to see what you do. Right. So if you're, if a parent is really ready to say, hey, I want my child to be one of the people who leaves school with agency and ready to launch off into the world. I think you can look at wonder.

We're looking to expand our schools as well. And you can look at Acton Academy. And there's many schools around. There's maybe 300 schools in the Acton Academy network. And there's plans to expand that. Oh, it's consistently expanding based on parent entrepreneurs that want to take on this hero's journey to expand that. Oh, well, it's consistently expanding, based on parent entrepreneurs that want to take on this hero's journey of their own. And so, you know, right now we're looking specifically,

we're in Kansas, you know, we're looking in Iowa as well, my home state, to expand our schools. And the purpose is just to allow more young people to have this experience in life, because I had somebody say to me once, man, these kids are so lucky. And my thought to them was, no, this is what they deserve. They deserve to be able to have like agency over their life appropriately at a young age to have mentors and people that

they look at you. It isn't even, no, you know, it isn't even only that they deserve it, right? I mean, you could say, well, you're, you're optimizing a juvenile polity that, that reflects how the world could be and should be constructive. But it isn't just that the kids deserve it. It's that because they're such a stellar resource, it's appallingly inefficient and pathetic of society not to utilize their full resources. And so because one of the things you made mention of early in our conversation was that each person has something to offer in the world that's unique. And people are unique. I mean, the things you made mention of early in our conversation was that, you know, each person has something to offer in the world that's unique and people are unique.

I mean, we're all human, but each of us has something about him or her that's not ever going to be replicated. And that needs to be brought forward. And it's in everyone's interest to ensure that that's brought forward. And you start that by not demoralizing children, right? So if there's a social interest here too that isn't, that isn't nearly limited to the individual. I think parents maybe don't understand how deep that extent goes.

And I'll just real quickly give this example. Imagine you have an eight year old that's just starting to write and they're starting to write stories and they bring you this little book that they've written. Yeah. The appropriate response to that is, wow. Yeah. Like, was this what you did well? Yes, here's what you could improve on.

Boy, it's great you've done that. Yes, the proper response is, wow, how hard was this for you to do? It's like you worked really hard on this. Yeah. What we all have a tendency to do is say, hey, but did you notice you spelled this word? Right, right, right. And there's nothing that's more demoralizing to an eight-year-old that's just accomplished something that they're proud of than to hear how they didn't do it right. Yeah. Yeah. And so if, so I would just say

for parents that have this belief, want this for their children, there's schools out there like Action Academy, Wonder, and you know, the idea of where the where can they go we can put the links is so forth in the description of the video but where can they go to find out more information so to find out more information about wonder our website is daring to wonder dot com daring to wonder dot com and I tell you quick sorry but where the camera GK Chester 10 I read something from him along go in his essay on authority and education. And he said this.

He said that even back then, one of the biggest problems that he saw was that the newest ideas were being taught to the youngest people, meaning that they hadn't been vetted. These ideas hadn't been vetted, but they're somehow making their way into the school. And he said that's the exact opposite. The oldest ideas should be the first things taught. And he said true education is to believe something so confidently, to know so confidently is true that you would dare to tell it to a child.

And I thought thinking about what's happening in the world today and how the new ideas are infiltrating quickly without being vetted. It's going back to this idea of that you would know something so truthfully that you dared to tell it to the child. I think that's the appropriate guiding principle. Well, that's a really good place to end, and it's a very good time to end. So I guess what we'll do is end. I'm going to thank you everyone who's watching and listening for your time and attention.

And I've been fascinated by what the Act in Academy and other sophisticated, advanced, and forward aiming schools have been doing. And I'm going to do an interview at some point with Kate Burble saying about her approach in the UK, which is quite radically different than your approach. And I was struck immensely by the success of her school. It's a much more formalized system of learning, but as I said, there isn't necessarily only one way to solve a complex problem, and it's not like she's not teaching her students

to be autonomous because she's definitely teaching them to be autonomous. So that element is very much shared. But, well, thank you very much for coming and talking in more detail about what the schools are doing. For those of you who are watching, you might, if you like this and you're interested, you might also want to check out the discussion I had

with Jeff Sandifer, which was more abstract in some ways. This part of the reasons I wanted to talk was to fill in the anecdotal details and to describe in some more detail what was actually happening on the ground in the and to describe in some more detail what was actually happening on the ground in the schools. And so, you know, I think that was very useful and also very interesting. I'd like to come down at one point and, you know, spend a couple of days watching your school just to see, because I'd like to see exactly what's going on for myself. I also think

that would be very fun. So maybe we'll do something like that in the future. That'd be a good thing to plan. And so, well, your website again, daring to wonder.com. Yeah, and the actin' Academy website for further information. actin' Academy.org. Actin' Academy.org. All right, well, thank you for everyone for watching and listening.

I'm gonna flip over to the Daily Wire Plus side. You can continue, consider joining us there if you want to hear more about the background of Zach's life, for example, and to discover with us what motivated him to pursue the path that he pursued, which is kind of what I do on the daily wear plus side. We might want to consider giving them some support because well, if you like this sort of discussion, they're the ones facilitating it, and that's real good of them. Thanks to the film crew here in Toronto today, and Zach, for making the trip up here, that's very much appreciated.

Thank you. And thank you all very much for your time and attention. See you soon. you