The Jordan Harbinger Show - 1082: Food Packaging | Skeptical Sunday

Episode Date: November 24, 2024

From shelf life to shelf appeal, Jessica Wynn explores the science and psychology of food packaging on this week's Skeptical Sunday! On This Week's Skeptical Sunday: Food packaging evolved from natural containers (shells, leaves) to complex materials, fundamentally changing how we store and consume food. The industrial revolution particularly accelerated this evolution. Modern food packaging is heavily regulated, with strict requirements for nutritional labeling, ingredients lists, and safety standards. The FDA didn't mandate standardized nutrition facts panels until 1990. Package design psychology significantly influences consumer behavior — colors (red/yellow stimulate appetite), placement, and imagery affect purchasing decisions within 90 seconds of viewing. Smart packaging technology is emerging, with developments like RFID tracking and nanosensors that can detect food freshness, contamination, and proper storage conditions. Consumers can make a positive impact on this industry by supporting companies using sustainable packaging alternatives and staying informed about packaging innovations — this helps drive industry change while maintaining food safety and convenience. Connect with Jordan on Twitter, Instagram, and YouTube. If you have something you'd like us to tackle here on Skeptical Sunday, drop Jordan a line at [e-mail] and let him know! Connect with Jessica Wynn at Instagram and Threads, and subscribe to her newsletter: Between the Lines! Full show notes and resources can be found here: jordanharbinger.com/1082 And if you're still game to support us, please leave a review here — even one sentence helps! Consider including your Twitter handle so we can thank you personally! This Episode Is Brought To You By Our Fine Sponsors: jordanharbinger.com/deals Sign up for Six-Minute Networking — our free networking and relationship development mini course — at jordanharbinger.com/course! Subscribe to our once-a-week Wee Bit Wiser newsletter today and start filling your Wednesdays with wisdom! Do you even Reddit, bro? Join us at r/JordanHarbinger!See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

Welcome to Skeptical Sunday. I'm your host, Jordan Harbinger. Today I'm here with Skeptical Sunday co-host, writer Jessica Wynn. On the Jordan Harbinger show, we decode the stories, secrets, and skills of the world's most fascinating people and turn their wisdom into practical advice that you can use to impact your own life and those around you. Our mission is to help you become a better informed, more critical thinker. During the week, we have long-form conversations with a variety of amazing folks, from spies to CEOs, athletes, authors, thinkers, performers. On Sundays, though, we do Skeptical Sunday. We're a rotating. guest co-host and I break down a topic you may have never thought about and debunk common misconceptions about that topic. Topics like circumcision, sovereign citizens, dietary supplements, banned foods, GMOs, toothpaste, crystal healing, targeted advertising, internet porn, and more. And if you're new to the show or you're looking for a handy way to tell your friends about the show, I suggest our episode starter packs. These are collections of our favorite episodes on persuasion, negotiation, psychology, disinformation, cyber warfare, crime and cults and more. And it'll help new listeners get a taste of everything we do here on the show.

Just visit jordanharbinger.com slash start or search for us in your Spotify app to get started. Today, from the original containers provided by nature to the use of complex materials and processes, food packaging is changed. You might have noticed that the perimeter of every grocery store, it offers fresh fruits, you got vegetables, you got meats, while the rest of the market aisles contain shelves of foods that are separated from us by thin layer of packaging. Regular consumers like us rarely think of packaging materials beyond which recycling container they eventually go into. But food packaging affects our diets and a whole lot more. So how do

food packaging materials and design influence our eating habits, the environment, shipping, and our growing population? Today, writer Jessica Wynn is here to unwrap the truth about food packaging. Thanks, Jordit. Do you know what the deal is with those tabs and lids that are impossible to pull off of everything from toothpaste to cream cheese to spaghetti sauce? I think they're so frustrating, actually. I mean, look, if the thing comes off and it needs a little bit of force, fine, I understand the glues tight that day. But the worst is when you're pulling on it and the whole tab rips off, or a little tiny bit of the plastic sheet comes off and then I'm stuck removing the rest manually digging my thumb into the yogurt. Or worse, I'm just stabbing at it repeatedly with a fork.

It's so gross. You get it on your fingers. It's just so frustrating. But it's wild to look at the evolution of food packaging and how it got to this point of getting into physical altercations with our containers. Like any good podcasts, though, we can start from the beginning and see how we got to this over-packaged world. Ah, that reminds me. How many podcasts does it take to change a light bulb? Oh, man. I don't know how many. It's going to be a bad joke. Yeah, don't worry. Just one. But to fully understand the process, first, we must look back to the 1800s. Also, something, something by these pre-made pre-packaged meal plants. Wow. That's actually spot on.

But we're going to go further back, like all the way back. There was a time when food was eaten, just where it was found. And nature provided the first food packaging with things like shells, gourd, leaves. They were used like Tupperware. So over the centuries, humans got creative by hollowing logs, weaving grass, and using parts of animals they didn't eat. Like animal fur was made into fabric. Then that fabric was used to wrap food and make bags, probably for hiding from other hungry animals and humans.

I think that makes sense, right? If you're going to bury your food or you're going to hide it in a tree, I'd want it covered by something. Oh my God. Yeah, right. And as crafts got more sophisticated, then fabrics were turned into baskets. And by around 8,000 BC, humans were storing food for future meals. So they then maybe didn't have to hunt and gather food as much.

You could do it all in one go. Kind of like we grocery shop. You don't do that every day. So then that must have given them some free time. I personally can get lost wandering the supermarket aisle. So I can't imagine wandering the earth to eat every single time I was hungry. Oh, I know. It's starved.

And it's all we would be doing. And so maybe it was like that free time that humans had that let them discover ores and compounds. because by about 5,000 BC, humans were using metals in a variety of ways, including pottery, and this led to storing food in vessels like bowls, bases, pitchers, things like that. It's hard to imagine not having a water vessel of any kind. Imagine having to go to the source of water every time you're thirsty. That would drive me nuts. Or to have a bag to carry around all the fruit you just picked.

Around 100 AD, paper was invented in China to... to record history, and then it morphed into wrapping foods. So over the next thousand years or so, the techniques slowly spread around the world. It took a thousand years for everybody to get on board with paper. That's crazy. I know. It seems weird, but the first known use of paper packaging in Europe wasn't until 1,300. And paper packaging wasn't used here in the United States until the 1800s. So the U.S. had only been wrapping food in paper for, what was that, 130 years? How were we ordering sandwiches and stuff?

How did you transport any kind of meat to give to somebody from a store? That's so weird. Yeah, eating on demand, I guess. I don't pop it in your pocket, maybe. Meat pocket. It wasn't until the 1840s that paper bags were first manufactured in England. And in 1852, the bag-making machine was invented in the United States. And then paper bags got really high tech in the 1870s when glue was used to seal them.

Very fancy. It's like the Pepperidge Farm Goldfish bags. It actually amazes me that those things are still paper, those like sleeves they use. Also, I love goldfish crackers, always have. That's actually completely irrelevant to what we're talking about. But I thought I threw it out there. Oh, they're delicious. But those bags, like that design, it's called the Gusset design.

And I'm personally against them. Not against the goldfish, of course, but the bags themselves, it's just bad packaging. It tears easy, things go stale. I have never opened a Pepperidge Farm Bag successfully. That's ridiculous. Sitched cloth pouch would make more sense. And cloth bags were preferred until commercial cardboard boxes hit the scene in England in 1817. Before the cardboard boxes, it was wooden barrels and crates that were common packaging.

in the Middle Ages. They were used for water, rum, dried foods, traveling long distance. And in medieval Europe, food items were displayed and sold out of the barrels. So shoppers who bought in small quantities, they had to bring their homemade wicker baskets, bottles, pictures, or whatever when purchasing food in the marketplace. So bringing in your own bags, actually not a new thing. That's funny. Sorry, I'm still stuck on the fact that you said you've never opened a pepperage farm bag successfully. Are you sure you're qualified to be a subject matter expert on this podcast? Sirza, I think I've been opening those since kindergarten, probably with one hand. It's really not that hard, Jessica. Really not. I bet you spilled some, though. I mean, look at you.

I can open paper bags without machinery over there. Anyway, by 1900, shipping cartons made from paperboard, it's started to replace wooden crates and barrels because they were lighter and cheaper. There is one thing I'm talented, and it's dumping goldfish crackers down my gullet. But the advancement in box technology, and I can't believe I'm saying box technology, or that it's fascinating. But it is fascinating. Remember when the Simpsons take a field trip to the box factory? Pepperidge Farm remembers. Oh, no.

You're just not going to let that bag thing go. Slowly. Moving on. The Kellogg brothers, they moved along the Advancement. when they created their health food cereal in 1863, and they put the cereal in a box, and then that box was put into a wax bag, which was tied around the box,

and the wax bag had the Kellogg brand name printed on it. By health food, you mean anti-masturbation supplement, because I think we've done a skeptical Sunday episode about this, or at least a podcast about this. I'm not sure if it's out yet, but basically cereal was invented to stop people, from rubbing one out? Sure, super cool story, but let's try to focus here, Jordan. I can focus. Thankfully, I've just had my corn flakes. Anyway, why was this seemingly the opposite? In your example,

why was the box inside the bag back then instead of the other way around? People were just figuring it out. It quickly changed to the packaging. We know today, of course, the bag on the inside of the printed box. What about glass? I feel like we skipped that. I know for a fact, Glass has been around for super long time. Oh, yeah. And scholars think that glass was first used as food packaging in Egypt, around 1500 BC. The ingredients and mixing process for glass are actually still pretty much the same as thousands of years ago. It's just the molding techniques that have developed like exponentially. And the first of those was the blowpipe, which was invented around 300 BC by the Phoenicians. And it allowed for round containers. So that changed packaging a little bit. Though glass has always been

colorful, clear, transparent glass wasn't discovered until the first century. So what was in the package was now visible. And the faster these glass containers were made, the more they were used. By 1889, the automatic bottle making machine was invented. And today, one of those machines produces 20,000 bottles a day. The U.S. makes like 27.5 billion glass bottles for food packaging in a year. That's 75 million bottles a day. That's a lot of ketchup. It shattered my expectations of how much of that we actually produced. The only thing that I have bottled in glass, I think, is this fancy pants yogurt that my kids love.

It's called wee because it's very fancy. And so they put French in. Oh, yeah, that is fancy. I'm like, what is this $5 a bottle? I was so annoyed when my wife bought it. And then I ate it. And I was like, I get it. It's so good.

So good. Oh, my gosh. But I don't think I have anything else in glass. I really don't. I think we have nothing else in glass. It's kind of dangerous and how it shatters. That's why food didn't move around that much. And then metals were tried. Gold and silver was too valuable for common use. But then people tried cheaper metals, but that freaked people out because they had a fear of getting poisoned. Yeah, I think that's warranted. I'm actually surprised metal lasted more than a minute as food packaging. Yeah, you can thank Napoleon. Metal cans were mostly used for tobacco historically, but in 1795, Napoleon contributed to the advancement of food packaging by offering 12,000 francs to anyone who could preserve food for his soldiers. And voila, a French chef found that food sealed

in tin containers and sterilized by boiling could be preserved for long periods. So sealed cylindrical cans were developed and metal packaging was now trusted. Merci, Napoleon. He really made a short work of the preservation problem. Oh, God. Anyone? Punching down. So tin was the first metal used for packing food, but its major disadvantage was and still is corrosion.

That's why tin is coated with protective layers when used for packaging. And the metal containers that developed, though, they allowed printing the brand name on the package for the first time. Then a few decades later, in 1825, aluminum was discovered, but it was expensive. Like, adjusting for inflation, it came in at $545 per pound. But when they, I guess, figured out it was so available, the price. prices steadily declined, and aluminum hit around $14 a pound in 1942. Then aluminum foil broke on the food packaging scene in the early 1950s, and the aluminum can made its debut in 1959.

Actually, a fun aside, it was until 1866, a hammer and chisel was the only way to open a metal can because they were all soldered together. then a metal tear strip was added, but it wasn't until a decade after that in 1875 that the can opener was invented. It seems like we're a little slow on the uptake. If cans were invented first and then the can opener took another decade

before somebody finally invented it, 10 years, I feel like I'd open one can with a hammer and just be like, wait a minute, there's definitely got to be a better way to do things with this. This is like an infomercial. There's got to be a better way as I hammer my thumb off while trying to open some tuna.

You could starve to death in a closet full of canned food if you weren't strong and had a hammer and a chisel nearby. I know. That's funny, but it's really sad, actually. Then we come to the material that we are almost familiar with today, plastic. So it was discovered in the 19th century, and most plastics in the beginning were reserved for military and wartime use. The first major impact plastic had in food packaging was when foam was created in the 1950s. This allowed for insulation and cushioning for shipping products safely.

Everything is plastic now. We've actually done a lot of shows on this, and all of them work depressing for the most part. Totally agree. And there's so many different types of plastics you could probably do shows on. But during the Civil War, there was actually a shortage of ivory. And since pool balls were made from ivory, billiard ball manufacturer, they offered a $10,000 reward for an ivory substitute. And it took a few years, but a New York engineer created a new plastic material called celluloid. That was in 1870.

And celluloid had to be carved and shaped, just like ivory. Eventually, celluloid was replaced with cellulose acetate, or we know it as cellophane. and that was manufactured by Jopont starting in 1924. The commercial use of cellophane didn't really become a staple in food packaging until the 50s. It must have been tough to print on cellophane in the early days. When I was a kid, I would always try to scratch letters off of things, just any packaging. And I remember thinking that actually this is a really ridiculous comment, but let me just leave it at. It must have been tough to print on cellophane in the early days.

How's that? It's good. I remember celvating hard to open, like a CD. You and your peppered farm. bag, so it doesn't surprise me. If you can't open a paper bag, you couldn't open a CD. Have you tried a hammer and chisel, Jessica? That might help you. That's why CDs went out of fashion. Smashed up all over the floor.

But labeling food packaging with the company name and content information, that's a relatively new package. Back in the 1660s, the phrase, let the buyer beware became popular because inferior quality products were sold to uninformed customers. So eating packaged food was a risk. Now labels contain a great deal of information, intended to protect and instruct the public. But even in the 1800s, it was just some food in a container. And you might get pretty sick if it wasn't the right kind of container. So reputable merchants who knew this, they began to mark their food packaging with their identification. official trademarks were then pioneered in 1866 by the Smith brothers for their cough drops that were marketed in large glass jars. Oh, yeah, trademarks are big business. I used to love

trademark law back in law school. It sounds like the Smith brothers cough drops idea was nothing to sneeze at. It wasn't. It was actually really huge idea. And then, I mean, the Industrial Revolution had opened up trade and a need for better packaging. So they all had to be labeled. And the packaging, it had to be durable and easy to produce. Food preservation was also a top priority during this time because there was new transportation methods meant for food. And, you know, the food was traveling further and more often. In 1890, biscuits were the first products that were individually packaged and sold by the National Biscuit Company, known as Nabisco. Oh, Nabisco short for National Biscuit Company.

Oh, man, that's a childhood jingle that stayed in my head for 40 years. Memorable. Yeah. They made the first packaging to preserve crispness by individually wrapping the cookies and then putting them in the tin. So packaging was advancing for beverages, too, when the bottle cap was invented in 1892. Food packaging also contributed to overall public health. In 1933, a new era of plastics began. with the creation of saran wrap.

This allowed for airtight food packaging. And then the tetrapack was invented in 1951. This paperboard-based package, it revolutionized Europe's dairy industry because it could store liquids without refrigeration. And the box shape, it was easy to stack and ship. And then Coors pioneered the use of aluminum cans in 1959. And in 1963, the first ring pole for beer cans was introduced. This is probably a dumb question, but what did they use before the bottle cap?

Because obviously you had the glass bottle with the liquid in it. It was sealed somehow. Do you know? Yeah, everything was soldered. Again, you'd probably have to just break the top of the glass or smash the top off. Oh, what? That's so, that's really something I would not want to do with a bottle I'm about to drink liquid out of. I'm not sure when this, like, I think the screw top actually came after the actual one you need an opener for today.

but it was a funny order in which we discovered the convenience of opening these containers we were making. So back in the Ringpool days, I assume they were still airtight and they made that sound, right? There are a few sounds more recognizable than opening a can. For sure. And the sound of opening a plastic bottle, when you open a soda, that arrived in 1973 when the first plastic bottles that contained carbonated drinks were. invented. This became the cheaper alternative to glass. So began the terror of plastic bottles. Oh, yeah. And the huge profits of the food packaging market. Design, production, and distribution of packaging materials was valued at $456 billion with a B in 2022. Man, that's a lot of boxes and cans.

It sure is. And it's projected to grow to over $700 billion by $20.000. So there must be some standards set for today's food packaging. I know you've got to have that nutrition label and that's got to be mandatory because on imported food they stick one on. So that I assume is a law. Oh yeah. There's plenty of regulations and they put everything into three simple categories for the food packaging, primary, secondary and tertiary. And the difference between them is the layer of protection the product has while being transported from point A to point B. And all the materials used are evaluated. Glass, metal, plastic, cardboard, paper, cellophane.

I kind of expected you to rail against plastic. We could, but I think most people are already aware of how problematic plastic is in the world. I think it's something like they say we consume a credit card's worth of plastic every week. Maybe we don't. But that plastic ends up in the oceans and then the fish. I know you've done a ton of episodes on this. So basically without a corporate renaissance, plastic is here. And there's a lot more to food packaging than just plastic.

Yeah, you're right. I've definitely talked about plastics extensively ad nauseum, really, in other episodes to the point where it's, I'm still doing it. But yeah, it doesn't get any less depressing. Yeah. I mean, we're just screaming into the void kind of. I hate plastic. I try to avoid it.

but it's the most common packaging used in the food industry. Because of its physical and chemical makeup, plastic can be used with pretty much any food. Plus, it's a low-cost material. So until it's cheaper, more effective form of packaging is created, plastic is here. Yeah, I hate how practical plastic is because of the environmental problems that it causes.

But, yeah, the other alternatives that we learn on the show are worse. Right. Like we said, glass is risky. It shatters. It leads to law. products and it's heavy to transport it requires a ton of heat to manufacture so the carbon footprint of glass is actually really enormous plastic eliminates a lot of these business concerns and it makes business sense I know we've actually

done a debunk of bioplastics before on skeptical Sunday so those are kind of a bust it's basically just plastic made out of other things like we're gonna take something that wasn't originally gonna become plastic and turn it into plastic using twice the amount of energy. So metals better for the environment in some ways, but again, carbon footprints. Should we be using that more maybe? Metals are actually some of the best food packaging materials. Like tin started the trend of metal packaging, but aluminum is what drives it most in today's world, which the best thing about aluminum cans is they're easily recycled. And it's best for transporting food items. It's the best

keeping out bugs, moisture, and air, and you can use it for wet and dry food. Like I said, it's the most recyclable, but it's really expensive. So our food costs would skyrocket. And it has the need for protective layers to avoid corrosion and reaction to acidic foods, and that can cause foodborne illness. So plastic is also safer. Metal also takes a lot of carbon to extract, manufacture, transport, and plastic, you can make clear or opaque. Metal's never transparent. So there's kind of no good option. To be fair, sometimes it is less appetizing to see what's actually in the container.

I'll take the picture on the label. Oh, my pasta's going to look like that when I pour the sauce on there. Deceive me, please. Yeah, it makes you feel like a better cook, maybe. I don't know. It's definitely something has to be considered when marketing in other countries. legend has it that decades ago, Gerber could not figure out why its sales were like zilch in the African market. And it turned out communities with the lowest sales correlated with

the lowest literacy rates because in those communities, people were relying on the picture of the label to know what it contains since they can't read. Oh, and Gerber's logo is the baby, right? And no one wanted to give mashed baby a try. Oh, my God. Even in the clear containers, it's just like this neutral colored mush that you can't really identify. Ooh. But I don't know. I have to say, mashed baby.

It could be quite delicious depending on the flavor profile. Oh, that reminds me of this. Baby, the other weight meat. Oh, no. Too far, Jordan. But the point is, good packaging. It's so much more than just. protecting food. Does the size of the package matter? Oh, Jordan, of course size matters. Any other

answers? Just trying not to make you feel insecure. And this is true in food packaging, too. Like optimizing package size ensures less food and packaging waste, and that can reduce transportation costs. So if restaurants and grocery stores can purchase smaller packages, they'll require fewer trucks and ships to transport their goods. That means fewer emissions, less congestion on the roads and waterways, and then we get food that's cheaper. You know what? You won't need a hammer and chisel to open up and enjoy. The products and services that support this show. We'll be right back. If you're wondering how I managed to book all these great authors, thinkers, and creators every single week, it's because of my network, the circle of people I know like and trust, and I am teaching

you how to build yours for free over at six-minute networking.com. This course, it's not cringy. It's very easy. It's down to earth. It's not going to make you look or feel bad or the people that you reach out to think that you're a big turd. It's just going to make you a practical connector, a better colleague, a better friend, a better peer. It takes a few minutes a day. That's it. And many of the guests on our show already subscribe and contribute to that course. So come join us. You'll be in smart company where you belong. You can find the course at six minute networking.com. Now back to skeptical Sunday. So the prices we pay at the grocery store are affected by the food packaging choices of a company. And so, hey, guys, smaller packages

are better. You heard it here first. Oh, yeah. Sure. Yeah. Smaller is better, Jordan, whatever you need to cope. But smaller is actually better for you. Like, when it comes to packaging, think about it. An apple is healthier than the cookies that are in a plastic sleeve, in a tray, in a box. There's no packaging. But the produce section is also regulated. Like, those stickers, on the fruit, they must be non-toxic and edible just in case somebody adjusts it. Oh, I've always been so careful to remove those thinking like, wow, this plastic sticker on the apple, better not eat that. But now you're telling me all that was just a waste of effort, and I could have been munching on those tasty tags this entire time?

I don't know how tasty they are. Well, yeah, probably not. What about what we print on our food packages? That's regulated too, right? You have to say certain things. You can't say other things. Oh, totally. Every word is regulated. And think about it. There's so much information about the food on any given package. Yeah, I don't know anybody that reads all the stuff on every package. That strikes me as weird. I'm more curious than I think a lot of people and I barely get past the nutrition label most of the time. Most people wouldn't understand all of it if you did read the whole container. There's the nutrition label. There's the serving size, the ingredients, portions, the art, the font, the font, the recycle signs, the weight, the expiration, address of distribution. Most containers have websites now. Many have QR codes. Then there's dietary certification symbols. Yeah, that's a lot of info.

Yeah. For many consumers, food labels are a primary source of information about the foods they eat. So it's important these labels are trustworthy and that companies are held accountable for the claims printed on their package. We're fortunate, right? We trust food packaging. We rarely face foodborne illness like those buyer-beware days. But when President Zachary Taylor died in 1850 after consuming contaminated fruit and milk at a picnic, the demand for labels assuring the public they won't die from eating, it was a top priority. And Taylor's cause of death actually led to the 1862 creation of the United States. State's Department of Agriculture, the USDA, which got to work on strict guidelines for food processing and packaging. But it wouldn't be for 128 years till a recognizable nutritional fax panel was mandated on all food products. But people just wanted a package to let them know it was safe. It's not like in the 1800s people were running to 7-Eleven or whatever. From what you said, packaged food wasn't even available back then like it is today. I mean, we, we mean, we, we

mean, the meat pocket joke earlier because they weren't even putting things in paper. Yeah, of course not. But as consumers' trust grew in packaged food, the amount of packaged foods increased. So until the 60s, Americans prepared the majority of their meals at home. But then after kind of the revolution of plastic, packaged foods were everywhere. So the USDA mandated that a list of ingredients be placed on all packaging. And in 1990, the USDA mandated that all food companies were required to make consistent claims and include a detailed, standardized nutrition fax panel on all food packages. Not until 1990. Gosh, that sounds so recent. I mean, I know it's not, but I guess I'm old.

But it seems like we would have had that for years before then or years by then, but not really, eh? Yeah, I know. The 90s seems like it was 10 years ago always. But yeah, there were minimal label requirements. in the 40s, it just got more strict in 1990. So what is printed on food packaging? It had already been to the Supreme Court in 1973, and that led to requiring nutrition facts be printed if the packaging made any health claims. So it was only if you wrote low fat or low cholesterol or something like that. The nutrition label had to be on the package at all? Yeah, correct. And any food packaging that made claims about preventing or curing a specific disease, they're actually considered an illegal drug, so you couldn't solve them.

So that's why psychedelic mushrooms don't have good packaging. What would that package look like? Ingredients. Mind-fri. Yeah. People don't read the labels anyway, do they? Like I said, I might look at calories and protein content because I'm in a meathead phase these days, but that's really it most of the time. The fact we don't read the labels is proof of how much we trust the food packaging industry, the FDA, and the federal government. Yeah, maybe that's one way to look at it, I suppose. Remind me to say that next time I'm debating a libertarian, one of those hands off my ham guys. Exactly. And labels, they're not always ignored. People still don't want to get sick. But the point is consumers were being fed information about

what they were being fed, and it was a selling point. Nutrition labels have are, and will be debated forever as we prove and disprove things about what we put in our bodies. Yeah, the health claims on a lot of labels are absolutely infuriating, especially stuff that you can buy online. Oh, my gosh, I know. I couldn't agree more. Like, food manufacturers were eager to respond to the customer interest, and so they used new, undefined claims on food packaging,

like extremely low and saturated fat in order just to catch consumers' attention. So in 1984, when the good old Kellogg Company began a labeling campaign using the back panel of a high fiber breakfast cereal to link fiber consumption to a possible reduction in the risk of certain cancers, food packaging as a marketing tool was a bit out of control. There was just an absence of regulatory action. Does fiber reduce cancer risks? I feel like I've heard that before, but now I have no idea if it's true, now that I hear it. See, you don't even see the package and you're still drawn in. I'm here for the anti-masturbatory claims that Kellogg's makes on the cereal, but I stay for the reduced risk of cancer. Yeah, your pious diet.

A variety of foods can lower risk of cancer, but it's more complicated than just eating a breakfast cereal, obviously. So packaging with those kinds of claims, it's irresponsible misinformation. And food packaging was scrutinized by the FDA after this. and the words printed on packaging is, like, really closely monitored. And consumers responded positively to these changes, or do we still not seem to care at all? It's like any good market, the food packaging industry, it changes with consumer demand. And the surge in consumer interest in nutrition in the 20th century definitely fueled what the food packaging looks like. And the packages that the labels were printed on, they also changed.

accordingly. So the consumer could be able to understand the labels on the package if they choose to read it. Yeah, the bureaucracy of health and nutritional information makes me hungry. But even the buzzwords on food packages are regulated. Reminds me of when I was a kid and you would see something like Kool-Late and it would be like vitamin C or Hawaiian Punch. Remember that stuff? And it was just like red sugar water and it would be like now with vitamins and it's like what your mom read that it was convinced i'm seven and i'm not convinced that these vitamins are good that this thing is good for you or fruit roll it's like real fruit and it is smashed corn syrup with strawberry seeds stuck into it attached to a piece of plastic sheeting i don't think anybody's really convinced by this i don't know

i'm on a tangent now no it's absolutely true food companies did whatever they could because And that was just it. They could put those words on there without any repercussions, whether they were true or not. So now every word's looked at. And the FDA, it tries to require food packaging now to clear up nutrition confusion, help consumers choose healthier diets, and give food companies an incentive to improve the nutritional quality of their products. The USDA and the FDA strongly believe that consumers need help. to eat healthy. Well, I think they're onto something there, but I'm not sure that they've been

super successful, something, something fattest nation on Earth. And I had looked this up to make sure that claim would be accurate, and it's not true. Actually, many of the islands in the South Pacific are fatter than the United States. So congratulations to Na'u Roo and company. That's really surprising, actually, but the information is there. But even if the strict rules on what the nutrition labels can print don't stop the marketing value of what the rest of the package says. So it's definitely a science. Like FDA research shows that graphic presentations like pie charts and bar graphs, they're not easy for consumers to comprehend. So percentages are found to be easiest for people to understand, which is why the nutrition label looks the way it does. The FDA worked with the graphic experts

to design the nutrition label. It took into account research on comprehension, and literacy. So everything written on the nutrition label is very deliberate. The calories and serving size, you'll notice, are printed in larger, bolder font because it's the easiest correlation for, you know, us dummies to understand. Yeah. Those labels do come across as official, but I don't know if I'm supposed to be a little offended. Maybe I am. Even if my aging eyes do appreciate the font boost with respect to the calorie count, either way, I suppose it is a relief that we can more or less trust what it says on food packaging, even if they try to get cute with serving size and stuff.

Like I love when they're like, oh, it's 200 calories. You're like, that's it? And it's like, yeah, for every 0.75 of these that you eat, it's like what? Right. It also depends on all those other things out there. If you even know what that all means. So food manufacturers are always playing with words on packages that will increase their sales.

But it makes the FDA have really specific definitions for, for terms like free, low, light, reduce, less, high, even the word healthy. The current definitions for all of these claims, like anything on packaging, on FDA-regulated food, it can be found on their website, and I will tell you it's a lot of information, even to just skim over. But the FDA is constantly attempting to combine the psychology of selling with the science of health. And it makes for really weird, gymnastics of deciphering what's said on food packaging. It started as a way to preserve and transport food,

but each package is like a little billboard advertising what's inside. Yeah, or distracting you from what's inside, right? As cereal boxes as a kid, remember those? And it was like the back was games and the toy that was in the bottom and stuff. And they were trying really hard not to be like, this is just sugar sprayed on some wheat. It's so good for you. Yeah, on some starchy flour.

Are the nutrition labels required to be printed on the back of the package? I notice they're always on the back, or is that just a choice? It is 100% a business choice because think about it. Printing the nutrition label on the front would be bad for sales. Yeah. So then you have the front of the package, and that's what we see first, and within seconds it can influence a purchase. This has made the front of packages a battleground between public health advocates and food manufacturers.

And because research has shown that positive labels like health stamps or those checkmarks or whatever that can overrate a food's healthfulness, public health advocates support initiatives for warning labels like stop signs to highlight low nutrient foods like those ultra-processed snacks. So all front-of-packaged labels in the U.S. are voluntary. So you can put whatever you want on there. So food manufacturers use it to highlight or hide. nutrition information that will increase their sales. But if warning labels became mandatory, the pressure on manufacturers to improve nutritional quality would definitely increase.

Research finds that consumers believe a food marked with a health claim is healthier than a product that doesn't. So if the front of those fruit roll-ups has like a low-carb, heart-healthy stamp, then of course you'll think that pure corn syrup is healthy. But they hide the required things on the back or the side. Oh, yeah, like definitely to hide them. They have to put what the FDA requires on the package somewhere. And what the FDA requires is ingredients, allergy information, and dates, like the sell by, best by, used by dates. I don't know if I've seen warning labels on packaging other than cigarettes, of course. In other countries, cigarette warnings are really gross. It, like, shows someone's lung or whatever after they've died or their teeth, like close-ups of their

teeth is so gross, right on the front. In Canada, they've started printing on the cigarette, like the paper that wraps the tobacco. It's like pretty much like you're dying or it says like crazy stuff on the cigarette itself while you're smoking. Wow. That's as close as you can get without banning it. I guess the next step is they put an additive in there that makes it taste absolutely rotten and disgusting. Oh. It's only a matter of time because other than outright banning it, which they might not be able to do, they could make it like, hey, make sure this tastes as horrible as possible. Like cilantro? Yeah, oh yeah. Maybe they could do a little worse than cilantro. Like, hey, this is Domino's pizza

flavored now. Sorry, everybody. We really want you to quit smoking. Yeah, this is going to taste like Arbys. That's what you guys get. If you're not going to heed the warning labels, we're going to make this taste like a chalupa. That's how you get people to quit smoking. So the thing is, I don't know if you put the warning label on the food. People are just going to ignore it probably and keep eating, right? Yeah, but there's actually, several countries, like including Chile, Brazil, South Africa, they've mandated front of packaging warning labels. And studies on the efficacy of these show that consumers understood and trusted the warning signs. And every item they tried this on lost sales, like dramatically. So it turns out

people respond more quickly to negative information, including mostly that which causes fear. But warnings don't have to be lethal. Warnings could just be for preferred diets. If you're religious and Jewish, you know the importance of eating kosher. What are the rules there? Those are, I assume, closely regulated. You can't just lie about something being kosher. Right, of course.

Kosher refers to Jewish dietary law, but those labels are not just useful if you're Jewish. Kosher labels on food products are also useful to vegetarians, vegans, the lactose intolerance, and other dietary restrictions. So kosher symbols are printed on all packaging, but it kind of looks like the periodic table. So if you don't need to know, it's probably overlooked.

Oh, there's more than one symbol for kosher. I thought it was just that little U in the circle. Oh, yeah. There's actually six basic kosher symbols. So the O with the U in it, that means it's kosher, but not kosher for Passover. The OUD indicates dairy. O-U-D-E-A-means dairy equipment was used.

And then there's symbols for meat, fish, Passover. It's a lot. Wow. So the bottom line is that food packaging must have the ability to be printed on because the government requires it. So thinking about it, that's probably even affected Halloween. There's no fresh-baked cookies or candy given out really anymore. Although that might even also be because of all the razor blades and needle scares and candy,

which I'm guessing probably happens to one particular neighborhood every decade. I don't know. Yeah, I think a lot of that is like poison candy myth, but there are unfortunately documented incidents that would probably bum us out to discuss. But regardless, like we must be able to trust our food. It's interesting what we notice and what we don't notice on food packaging. Yeah, totally. And what we're conditioned to notice. Food packaging, also involves the psychology of recognition. And a lot of research goes into packaging design. Like packaging's purpose,

so it grew from protecting food to informing consumers to increasing sales. And food companies work really hard to make well-designed logos and packages that evoke positive emotions, create a sense of trust, and establish a strong connection with consumers. It really plays an influence on our purchasing decisions.

Emotions. Am I supposed to get emotional when I'm looking at raisin brand or whatever? Maybe. Packaging affects so much emotion you aren't even aware of. I can get sad opening a package. Like when you try but fail to open a paper bag of Pepperidge Farm Milano cookies? Yes, okay, yes. Or like those tabs that frustrate us and we can't open the package.

And I will start to imagine an elderly person. who's alone and they're trying to open what I'm struggling with and it breaks my heart. Oh, God. Grandma just wanted to open the catch up and she had to get a knife because the plastic tab under the lid won't pull off. And now she's cut herself. Oh, my God. You might want to see a therapist about this. Okay, I get it.

The emotion of packaging I'm on board. But what makes an effective package design? Because for me, it seems like a lot of the stuff, it all blurs together. Sure. I mean, food packaging 101, like simplicity is the most important. important thing. And food packaging, it strives for immediate recognition among consumers. So a good logo will be easily incorporated into all marketing materials like packaging. There's psychology behind memorable logos as well, I assume, just like jingles. Yeah, for sure, absolutely. And color psychology is

the most important. Different colors conjure different emotions. And studies prove red and yellow stimulate food cravings. So it's no coincidence. So many food packages and logos are red and yellow. Think the McDonald's arches, Ritz crackers, Doritos. Yeah, they went all in. I mean, Doritos, they made the actual food orange. And then there's Wendy's Burger King, In-N-Out, Cheese-It, Lays.

Now that I think about it, I've never really noticed it before, but lots of this junk food is the same set of colors. I know. I know. And red and yellow are everywhere in the... them. And like you said about the Doritos, think about how many other snacks and sauces and chips are orange. Orange is a blend of red and yellow, and we perceive it as more appetizing. Which is weird because I don't think, oh, this is the best color for Cheetos. And yet,

orange is the best color for Cheetos, baby. That's why I can eat so many. Does the shape of the packaging also matter, or is that more of a practical concern? Yeah, I mean, it does matter to some extent, but mostly just our packages are shaped the way they are for stackability. Like the shapes and symbols printed on packaging, they promote the brand or health benefits. So like that checkmark or that heart shape on a package is communicating things to a consumer. The typography and font play a role in our eating habits too, like how words and letters are written captures our attention. It sends different messages. And a lot of it is subliminal. According to research, consumers make a subconscious judgment about a product in less than 90 seconds of viewing it,

and 62 to 90 percent of them base that assessment solely on color. Color registers much faster than text or the complex graphics or those nutrition labels. The colors chosen for our food packaging have intended subliminal messages to attract customers. Think about the bright colors used for children's foods and drinks. And then softer colors, they're more appealing to older consumers. Colors like green or blue help to portray healthier options. And these links between colors and the influence they have on human emotion and behavior, it's really well established.

It's similar to how, like, neurons fire when we're hungry, that the color red enhances the appetite and stimulates a physical response. Our brain processes yellow the fastest, so it grabs attention. And studies show yellow actually releases serotonin. So on a subliminal level, that might make consumers feel good about what they're buying. In scientific study researching orange juice packaging, it was found that orange packaging led consumers to expect a higher level of fruit juice content compared to the same beverage in white packaging. That's interesting. By the way, I love the way you say orange or orange, as you say. That's very a chic somehow. Are any colors bad for marketing? Because now that I think about it, if yellow and red are

good, it almost seems like the opposite of those, if you can do that with colors, would be bad. Yeah, sure. You'll see red and yellow the most next time you go to the market, I bet now. But blue is the most unappetizing color. Besides blueberries, the color blue is almost non-existent in natural food. And the thought of it, like through evolution, that might make us think of mold. I just think of blue cheese and cool ranch Doritos, but that's their problem. Well, right. Yeah, there's cool ranch Doritos and then there's Oreos. So there's definitely exceptions. Blue's a complicated one because there was a study in the 70s where people lost their appetite and got sick when served a steak that was dyed blue with food coloring, despite

it being perfectly edible. But all colors have positive uses. So I bet it was through these studies, they figured out blue implies water and freshness, so it can be good for like bottled water or milk or seafood. White packaging makes people think that the product does not contain many ingredients. And brands also see benefits of using black to portray a sense of luxury, like think like Monster Energy drinks or Jack Daniels. Food packaging sounds like it is as manipulative as subliminal advertising. Yeah. Food packaging is. indeed subliminal advertising. And food packaging reaches us young. Like targeted marketing raises serious concerns when it comes to our children. Food marketing to children, it's not just bright

colors, right? It uses childish lettering, cartoon characters, celebrity photos of sports people, and references to fun and play. Like theoretically, if a company wants to start building brand recognition and loyalty early, it can aim at three-year-olds. That's when it's been found we can start to remember brands. So products with children-targeted elements on the packaging are found to be higher in fat, sugar, and salt in comparison with foods targeted to the general population. Folks, it seems I urgently need some corn flakes all of the sudden, so we'll be right back.

Thank you for listening and supporting the show. It is your support of our sponsors that keeps the lights on around here. all the deals, discount codes, and ways to support the show are all in one searchable, clickable place, jordanharbinger.com slash deals. All right. Now for the rest of Skeptical Sunday. This might even be a dumb question because it seems so obvious to me. But like, why don't healthy food manufacturers design their packaging the same way?

Because I got stuff for my kids and you're right. The snacks are all like, there's cartoon characters on them and there's skateboarding and the other one's doing a flip. And then it's like, here's the healthy stuff geared towards kids. and it's like a picture of an apple on a white background. Totally. I cannot find a good answer to this. Like, food packaging strategies should be focused on limiting promotions of unhealthy food to

children. But it seems the healthier the food, the more boring the package, even if it's for kids. It's like inexplicable. I really wish I had a good answer as to why this is. Yeah, the only theory I can think of is that the packaging is actually geared towards adults to get them to buy it. But then it's fine, but I got to convince my kid to eat this. I know.

Yeah, it's crazy. I might buy the one that has the apple on the white background and be like, aha, this is healthy. But then I ask my son if he wants it and he's like, no, I want the checks mix with the guy who's skateboarding on his head. So thanks a lot. They do get us young with the images. And I know also that by buying cereal for myself, because I don't let my kids eat it.

But there's no toys in the package anymore. I went to go get some cap and crunch because I was like, oh, I can buy whatever cereal I want now. And I thought, oh, there's going to be like a bouncy ball in there or some sort of flying disc shooting thing. And there's nothing in there. And I looked this up. It's illegal now to do that. Yeah, I think they passed that in like the early 2000s. I don't know if it was because it was making kids buy crappy foods or if it was a choking hazard.

I'm not sure exactly why, but for whatever reason, the FDA. said no more toys, but McDonald's, of course, has a loophole and they still have toys and their happy meals. I guess there's ways to get around it. I don't know. Yeah, interesting. That's a good point. Maybe because they're quote-unquote a restaurant, they can do that kind of thing, but you can't do it at the grocery. I think technically it's not pre-packaged. I don't know. Maybe you're onto something. You're right. They did come through that unscathed. I'm sure there were a few steak dinners involved in them being able to continue doing that. Plus, it's complicated for children's products because it is.

It's marketing to the kids and the parents. But have you noticed products for your kids? They're on the lower shelves. Yeah, I guess I haven't really paid attention to that, but it does make sense. And you're right, a lot of the smaller serving size stuff is on the lower shelves and candy and stuff like that. I guess that's more good business, but it's not just kids that are swayed by the packaging. Oh, for sure. I mean, what do they say?

You never get a second chance to make a first impression. That's why high-quality food packaging is essential. In the context of, like, customer satisfaction, food products with eye-catching packaging simply have an aesthetic advantage in the market. And as consumers browse more and more online, on Instacart and food delivery sites, packaging is more important than on the supermarket shelves.

Companies can significantly increase the sale of items, just buy their packaging. Food packaging is on so many things, and it's a huge sales tool, obviously. I mean, I guess that part should have been more obvious to me from the jump. Yeah, I mean, we just don't think about it. And one trend of food packaging must stand out in now is social media. 40% of consumers share images of food packaging on social media. This means that creative food packaging can touch on those emotions and psychology

via posts and photos. With all the awareness directed and environmentalism on social media, what is the food packaging industry doing to keep up with that, if anything? Yeah, of course, another complicated issue. It's all trial and error right now. Nothing that's been tried has been the solution. So unpacking the environmental footprint of food packaging, it's really involved.

And from the plastics that encase our groceries to the coatings on our to-go coffee cups, The choices made in food packaging, they have far-reaching consequences, and we just haven't found a perfect, eco-friendly solution. Plastic packaging is just a growing ecological menace. I'm almost getting tired of talking about it. Yeah, because it's tiring to talk about. Plastic packaging has become synonymous with convenience, though, even though it comes at a great cost to the environment. My opinion, we have been convinced. We, the consumers, are the problem and need to recycle and bring a bag instead of food manufacturers and water bottle factories and other big corporations taking accountability for the materials that they foist on us. What can a person do, grocery shopping? Hey, excuse me, do you have any food sustainably grown and walking distance that have had no contact with plastic? It's an impossible thing. So, we know plastic food packaging pollutes the oceans and microplastics enter the food chain and end up back on our plate, but we need to eat. So in a way, we're packaging our packaging and we're becoming the sort of meat sack that holds the broken down plastic packaging that used to hold our food and now ended up in our food.

And it's meta. It's like packageception. I don't know if I'd call us meat sacks. I'll take it as a compliment, I guess. What can consumers really do but complain? The environmental concerns that surround traditional packaging material is slowly shifting towards sustainable alternatives within the food industry. And these alternatives, including biodegradable and compostable materials, they do hold promise in reducing the ecological footprint of food packaging. It's just, it's really expensive. And shoppers also, they need to be educated. They need to understand the benefits of eco-friendly packaging and be willing to support businesses that make environmentally responsible choices.

Like, I might like the plastic packaging more, but you just have to weigh the options. Yeah, sure. It's a slow change. Are there health implications of modern food packaging? Oh, yeah, of course. Beyond the ecological concerns, many food packaging materials contain chemicals, and they can migrate into the food that they encase. and that raises concerns about their impact on our health. But consumers have the right to know what they are exposing themselves to when purchasing packaged foods. It's just really hard to sift through all the BS for both the manufacturers, the consumers, and the FDA.

Regulatory agencies around the world monitor and then ban the use of certain chemicals in food packaging as they find out, yeah. After we've all consumed like 300 million tons, of it. And it's okay. Fifteen years ago, we had a hint this was bad and now we're pretty sure. So in the next 25 years, we're going to ban this. Thanks a lot. Yeah, it's a bit of a relief. But considering the nutrition label thing wasn't locked down until 1990, I just think there's got to be so much work to be done to ensure the safety of food packaging materials and public health because of lobbying and all that. Oh, yeah, for sure. But at least there is a call for action

and awareness. In our quest for convenience, we can't overlook the profound consequences of the packaging choices we make. Yeah, but then you get hungry and just grab whatever without considering the packaging. I mean, I do that. And are there real solutions? Because it seems so out of control, what is the future of food packaging? Innovations are making food packaging that increase the shelf life of food products. Technology is actually playing a major role. in new food packaging. So high-tech food packaging. I don't know if I've come across this.

What's that all about? You have come across it, though. Like those little gel pads or things like it in the food packages that keep our food fresh, don't eat. They're really high-tech and new. And tracking devices ingrained in packaging are being used. It's just not ready to be used by consumers yet. But 21st century innovations in nanotechnology are used for demands for global and

fast transport of fresh, safe food. Companies are actually tracking all of their packages. To what end? Will my food maybe one day itself tell me if it's safe to eat? My guess is? Absolutely. Yes. Packaging protects food from environmental influences like heat, moisture, oxygen, and on and on,

prolonging shelf life. We've always put things in the food to preserve products. Think of hops. Like, that's where IPA comes from. So when the British colonized India, they wanted their British beer. The only way to get it there preserved was to pack it with hops. And so it became India Pale Ale. And so that's why we have hoppy things.

It was just a preservation technique. But now we can put things in the packaging itself to preserve food. And these new tracking systems enable tracking through the food supply chain from the source to disposal. tracking system? So is it like smart food packaging? Yeah, man. Active and intelligent food packaging is happening. And it's not to tell you just where the package is, but the quality of the contents. So active packaging, it interacts with the food and the environment to increase food preservation. Developments in active packaging have led to advances in like everything from delayed oxidation and microbial growth to old. odor and aroma emitters. Intelligent packaging, it's designed to monitor and communicate information about the food

quality like ripeness and temperature. These smart devices can be incorporated right into the packaging material or attached to the inside or outside of a package. And the FDA is recognizing this and it's researching all these technological advancements. Then it'll probably be more prevalent on the market. But Walmart, Home Depot, and like other. retail outlets, they already use radio frequency identification. So it's likely to become very prominent for tracking and tracing produce and other perishables. So my food's just going to say,

hey, eat me or hey, it's too late. Throw me away. I'm telling you, absolutely yes. You can find the beginnings of this in the meat industry where there's these oxygen scavengers that are embedded into the packaging and they remove the oxygen. So it keeps the meat. better, fresher, longer. There's like absorbent pads that are in use to suppress microbial growth. And there's all kinds of tech tricks that can be incorporated into our packaging to make the food last longer. They're all being put into use.

So this nanotechnology is in the packaging itself. That is pretty cool. I'm wondering when we're going to have scratch and sniff. Remember those stickers you had as a kid? And it would be like, this is a strawberry guy. And you could scratch it and it smelled a little bit. I always wonder why, for example, candy packaging doesn't smell like the candy and that it wafts up to you while you're checking out. And it's, oh, I want some licorice now suddenly.

I guess if every package did it, it would just smell disgusting in there. But I don't know. I don't know. I'm going to wait for a Harbinger candy or something. I mean, I think that's not a- It smells just like Jordan Harbinger. Yummy. It's not a bad idea.

I would rather scratch and sniff something. Careful what you say next. Careful what you say next. My wife listens to the show. That actually open the milk container or whatever, right? It might save us a step. That's true. But there's actually a company called Fresher Longer,

and they're testing storage containers that allegedly contain silver nanoparticles infused into the packaging to stop the growth of microorganisms. There's just so much research and testing happening. So tech is all about freshness, pretty much, so far. Yeah, absolutely. The smart packaging goal is not only shelf life extension, but it aims to reduce food safety risks that are associated with improper storage and cooking.

Yeah, I like the idea that high-tech food packaging sounds like it has the potential to eliminate foodborne illness, which I assume kills a zillion people a year globally. It's really incredible. Yeah, I'm not sure the number, but of course, yeah, it's a threat. And so using these like radio frequency identification systems, they're called RFID, you could use those wirelessly. And they're tags that store data, transfer it to a reader, and then that data is decoded. The tags remind me of when we tag our pets, if those tags, not only we're telling us where our pet is, but the health of our pet. It's like an Apple Air tag, but for food.

Your steak is on Wilshire Boulevard and it's approximately 42 degrees Fahrenheit. And it never dipped below that or it never went above that for too long. So you're probably good to eat this thing. Yeah, you'll know everything. But like those air tags, they're pretty expensive. So RFID tags, they're still too pricey right now for use on individual packages. And there's actually privacy concerns. So currently those tags, they can be read by any compatible reader.

So whatever data is on them is vulnerable to hackers. A shipment could get rerouted, purchasing info stolen, or depending on the kind of package being tracked, access to VIP locations or hotel rooms could be authorized. So the guidelines for the ethical use of the RFID, they need to be established. So it sounds like one day I might be able to use, I don't know, asparagus to get backstage at a Taylor Swift concert. I can't wait. I didn't know you were a Swiftie, Jordan. Yeah, they slowly have become one.

It's not even, yeah, I don't want to go down that road right now. The ethics of food packaging, wow, are companies on board? It just seems like they would benefit from this. Oh, for sure. Like I said, Walmart and Home Depot, they've been testing the technology. And then there's others that advocate this RFID tech, like the U.S. Department of Defense, major retailers like Albertsons, Target, Tesco, they're all for it. An RFID technology, it also provides security and safety benefits for food companies through

tracking the origin of supplies. For example, and I don't know how I feel about this, but a small California winery uses RFID to track its barrels and then uses the data to make sure their product is being sold at its highest integrity. It's kind of like spying on a restaurant or bar. Oh, geez. I'm not sure how a dive bar owner would feel about the supply chain of his pickled eggs being scrutinized too closely, but I do like the idea of making sure stuff's not spoiled by the time it gets to you. Yeah, it's a good point, though. Smart packaging will affect customer service. And with RFD technology, the package, it becomes intelligent. And get this, it will even be able to communicate with your appliances and identify information

related to the storage of your packaged food. These outstanding tracing abilities of RFID tags to individual food products, they can let manufacturers audit every single phase of a product, monitoring correct handling, transportation, storage, delivery, and consumption. So my refrigerator can eventually tell me via text message maybe that I left the yogurt out. And I actually kind of need that.

It sounds like we've come a long way from hollowed out logs as food packaging. I know. And it kind of crept into our lives unnoticed, too. Remember those cores cans and the mountains turned blue when it was cold enough to drink? Oh, yeah. That's right. That's right. It seems so gimmicky, but that was really high-tech things being tested.

I mean, the RFID system, it has some technical weaknesses, but it's really exciting. The nanotechnology innovation could potentially raise food safety and food quality. So the research of nanotech for food packaging, it began in the 90s, like before the Coors Cairns, with this cool luminescent protein spray that glows bright bound to E. coli or salmonella. More recently, researchers at the University of Pennsylvania have used nanosized carbon tubes and they coat them with strands of DNA to create nanocensors with abilities to detect odors and tastes.

Wow, I'm stuck on the poop detecting spray. Keep that away from me at all costs. So you might be disappointed at the results. So food packaging will itself be able to taste someday, essentially. How cool is that? That's awesome. I mean, I think it's possible, but do we want our packaging to taste test our food? I don't know.

I'm for it right now, but we will. will have to wait and see. I think that wraps up our discussion on food packaging. Super interesting. A lot of cool stuff coming down the pipe, even if I'm a little nostalgic for bouncy balls in my cereal. Yeah, it's for the best. I probably assure you. And you had some pretty fresh dad jokes this time. That was fun. Yeah, it was fun. Thanks for listening. Topic suggestions for future episodes of Skeptical Sunday to Jordan atjurbaner.com. Show notes at Jordan Harbinger.com. transcripts in the show notes, which again are at Jordan Harbinger.com. Advertisers, deals, discounts, and ways to support the show are at Jordan Harbinger.com slash deals. I'm at Jordan Harbinger. I say my name

a lot during the show, don't I? On both Twitter and Instagram, you can also connect with me on LinkedIn. Just search for it. No, I don't need to tell you what to search for. You can find Jessica on her substack between the lines, and we'll link to that in the show notes as well. This show is created an association with Podcast 1. My team is Jen Harbinger, Jace Sanderson, Robert Fogger, Ian Baird, Millie Ocampo, and Gabriel Mizrahi. Our advice and opinions are our own. I'm a lawyer, but not your lawyer, so do your own research before implementing anything you hear on the show.

Also, we may get a few things wrong here and there, especially with Skeptical Sunday, so if you think we all really drop the ball on something, definitely let us know. We're usually pretty receptive to that. You all know how to reach me, Jordan atjurbaner.com. Remember, we rise by lifting others. Share the show with those you love.

And if you found this episode useful, please share it with somebody else who could use a good dose of the skepticism and learning we doled out today. In the meantime, I hope you apply what you hear on the show, aside from the poop detecting spray. You might want to stay away from that so you can live what you learn, and we'll see you next time. You're about to hear a preview of the Jordan Harbinger show with the investigator who solved a serial killer case that had gone cold for decades. There was a definite spike in serial predator crime in the 1970s. Part of it was the ready victim

pools that don't exist today. Houses generally didn't have alarm systems. We don't see women hitchhiking much today. Joe DiAngelo was a full-time law enforcement officer. He's breaking into houses in the middle of the night, raping women or girls that are home alone that he's binding up and sexually assaulting. He ended up committing 50 of these attacks in Northern California between 1976, 1979, and just disappeared. I started working that case in 1994. As a cold case investigator, even though the case is 30 years old, it's like, no, you know, this is still a public safety issue. We need to remove this offender from society. And in 2001, 10 people had been killed across six cases.

I'm seeing this woman's body laying inside her house and the photos of her alive on the shelf above her body. She battled for her life that I could see this combat go throughout that entire room. After the Golden State Killer raped some of his victims, he would crouch in the corner and cry. They said he was sobbing, you know, it was like genuine. In fact, one victim, he was sobbing while he was raping her. The last thing I did in my career before I retired was I drove up and parked in front of his house. I debated, should I just go knock on his door? I didn't know he was a Golden State Killer, but this was such a brazen, brutal predator.

He absolutely had to be caught. To learn more about how Paul Holes puts himself inside the minds of serial killers, check out episode 725 of The Jordan Harbinger Show. This episode is sponsored in part by Something You Should Know podcast. Finding a new great podcast shouldn't be this hard, so let me save you some time. If you like the Jordan Harbinger show, you'll probably like something you should know with Mike Carruthers. It's one of those shows that makes you smarter in a practical, useful way. Same curiosity vibe we go for here, just in a fast-focused format.

Mike brings on top experts and ads. the exact questions that you'd want to ask, and the topics are all over the place in the best way. Recently, they've covered things like why we care so much what other people think, the benefits of laughter, why sports fans get so invested, and what makes people like you or not. The through line is always the same. Smart ideas you can actually use in real life. Something you should know has been featured in Apple's shows we love, and it's got thousands of five-star reviews because it's consistently interesting. So if you want another show that scratches that I want to understand how people in the world really work, itch,

search for something you should know wherever you get your podcasts. Look for the bright yellow light bulb and start listening. You can thank me later.