The Jordan Harbinger Show - 314: Michael Yon | China's Big Trouble in Little Hong Kong

Episode Date: February 18, 2020

Michael Yon (@Michael_Yon) is an author, columnist, and award-winning independent war correspondent who gives us a frontline view of the current civil unrest between Hong Kong protestors and the government of mainland China. What We Discuss with Michael Yon: What Michael means by his oft-truncated and misunderstood quote: "If a writer wants to make money, he should avoid truth and tell people what they want to hear. Yet to win the war, tell the truth." The difference between riots, protests, general civil unrest, and insurgency -- and what's really going on in Hong Kong right now in contrast with the official story. Why Michael considers himself a war correspondent and not a journalist -- and how the two differ. Why the long-simmering relationship between China and Hong Kong is only now coming to a boil, and what the rest of the world should take away from this. How the current movement in Hong Kong compares to Poland's Solidarity Movement of the '80s -- and why this especially worries the Chinese Communist Party. And much more... Full show notes and resources can be found here: https://jordanharbinger.com/314 Sign up for Six-Minute Networking -- our free networking and relationship development mini course -- at jordanharbinger.com/course! Like this show? Please leave us a review here -- even one sentence helps! Consider including your Twitter handle so we can thank you personally!See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

Welcome to the show. I'm Jordan Harbinger. As always, I'm here with producer Jason DeFilippo. On the Jordan Harbinger show, we decode the stories, secrets, and skills of the world's most brilliant and interesting people, and turn their wisdom into practical advice that you can use to impact your own life and those around you. We want to help you see the Matrix when it comes to how these amazing people think and behave. We want you to become a better thinker. If you're new to the show, we've got episodes with spies and CEOs, athletes and authors, thinkers and performers, as well as toolboxes for some people. skills like negotiation, public speaking, body language, persuasion, and more. So if you're smart and you like to learn and improve, you'll be right at home here with us. Today, Hong Kong is in the news a bunch lately. If you're like me, you watch with interest, but perhaps not a deep understanding of what's actually going on and why this is important to the rest of the world.

Michael Yon, an award-winning independent war correspondent, joins us here on the show to give us not only some background on Hong Kong, and of course the protests and civil unrest there, but why these protests may already be an insurgency capable of destabilizing the Chinese Communist Party itself. Michael has been embedded in Iraq, Afghanistan, and now Hong Kong, hitting the streets nearly every single night to film and document civil unrest, police brutality, political action, and violence. His work is a unique blend of war reporting, journalism, and deep research and study of all of the issues surrounding this unique event in world history. If you want to know how I got folks like this on lock in my network, well, I'm teaching you how to do the same.

Check out our six-minute networking course, which is free over at jordanharbinger.com slash course. And by the way, most of the guests on the show actually subscribe to the course and the newsletter. So come join us. You'll be in great company. Now, here's Michael yawn. One comment that I thought was kind of funny, your last name sounds Asian. And my wife was like, make sure people know that he's not Asian because it might sound

like he has a biased perspective, which I thought was funny coming from an Asian woman. Yeah, because the name Yan is Korean as well. And it's also French. My mother's side came to America in 1609, actually. We traced them back. Last name was Yason. They got shipwrecked on Bermuda and then finally made it to Jamestown after being shipwrecked for about six months. And then my father's side came more about 100 years later. So we've been back in the United States forever. I mean, my grandfather's several fought in the Revolutionary War. It's like a Forrest Gump history. War of 1820. 12 Civil War. The whole works, man. So you have a military background yourself. Your nickname was Bam Bam, is that true? Yeah, it was Bam when I was in special forces because I was very, very strong. It was during the 80s Reagan military buildup. And so they let young people try out for special operations units like Green Berets, which is what I did. Actually, I almost went seals, but then I decided to go to Green Berets because I wanted to go to things like language schools and that sort of I got into Green Berets at age 19, and they just called me Bam Bam because I was so young,

and I was extremely strong. So they called me Bam Bam. When you were in Special Forces, where were you based primarily? Different places. I went through the initial training at Fort Bragg in North Carolina, and then I went to a language school in California for German. And then I was stationed in Massachusetts. I was in the 10th Special Forces Group at Fort Devons, and then I was stationed at a place

called Bad Toltz in southern Germany, which was like a little heaven. Wow, yeah, I can imagine being in Germany in the 80s. I was there in the 90s after the reunification, and I was in the East, and I think that must have been kind of a special time to be deployed over there. It sure was. And then I was there in the 90s as well, but not in the Army. So I was in East Germany when it was still East Germany, and then Czechoslovakia, when it was still that, and Hungary, Romania, all that.

And finally, I lived in Poland for two years, but that was after the Army. You've covered some crazy stuff, though. I mean, one thing that really stood out is you covered this obscure Hindu cult that, is this even true they eat human flesh to supposedly gain magic powers? Is that a real thing? It's so creepy. Oh, yeah. You know, I went to India and I came across that sect called Agoris, and I realized that there were some Americans and Italians and others who were involved. And I thought, well, that's very strange. Some Americans are involved in a cult of cannibals in India. So I started tracking them. Oh, it was. was epic. It was the most incredible manhunting I've ever done. And it went for two and a half years, actually. I tracked them through India, Nepal. I went to Tibet and China and Hong Kong and back to India. And then I resumed the tracking there and ended up in, you know, Kashmir and just unbelievable. It was more intense and serious than anything I saw in the wars. And, you know, I was in a lot of

combat and different wars. And cannibal hunting was just something else. That sounds like a conversation over a beer but probably no snacks just because you're talking about something so gross. Yeah, there's certainly no pork skewers. I mean, they say it tastes like, they call it long pig. Oh, man, that's a whole world of nasty. You're an independent journalist, which it's a unique animal, you guys are. You've been quoted as saying, if a writer wants to make money, he should avoid truth and tell people what they want to hear, yet to win the war, tell the truth. What do you mean by that? That's kind of a bold statement, and I'm sure it ruffled a lot of feathers. It did, especially because when enemies came out of the woodwork, they cut that second part.

I wrote that in 2006, right? Later, when I started attacking General McChrystal, he was running the war in 2010. People then found that quote, cut off the second part where I said, but tell the truth if you want to win and use that like a bludgeon. But what I was signaling, when I wrote that, very clearly signaling, like, you know, when your teacher stomps on the floor, I was saying, I know you want to hear that we're winning the war in Afghanistan. but we're not. And that was 2006 back when it was like received wisdom that the war was won. And so I wrote 12 major dispatches in 2006 saying that we were losing the war in Afghanistan. Now it's common knowledge. But if you rewind the tapes to 2006 and see what I wrote, it was quite controversial. And then in 2010, a lot of people are like, yeah, we knew it all along. No, you didn't.

Insurgency is something I know quite well, both from my Green Beret days. And then I spent, years out in various insurgencies, right? Whether it's Afghanistan or Iraq or Nepal or I can talk about insurgency at a PhD level. So in other words, I can go into a place like Hong Kong, which I've done, and I can tell you very quickly, are these just protests, are these riots? Is this civil unrest? Or is this actually an insurgency? By the way, I'd never call myself a journalist. I'm just a war correspondent and a writer, but I'm not a journalist because I do things that journalists should never do, like pick up a weapon during a firefight and actually was firing and that sort of thing, but it was life and death stuff. But anyway, journalists aren't supposed to do that. I'll do it without a hesitation, and I won't

apologize for it. You know, a lot of the freelancers and journalists that you see on the ground out, say, in Hong Kong, they're doing very good work. They're very courageous, but I haven't found any of them out there that know anything about insurgency other than the word. They'll be like, is that guerrilla warfare, you know, that sort of thing. But they've never been in insurgencies and even most of the people who have still could not come into it and analyze it and then explain why it's growing and the symptoms. So when I went to Hong Kong in June, you know, it really kicked off in June. There was that protest on June 9th and I was sitting here in my office where I'm at now and I said, uh-oh, that could be serious. I'm not sure. Let's watch the pattern.

Saw a couple of more big protests. And I thought, well, that might be civil unrest. So I jumped on an airplane after about the third big protest, I was there. In Hong Kong. Oh, yeah. I got there in Hong Kong in late June because I've been watching Hong Kong. I've written two books on China. I'm working on my third book on that. I won't get on an airplane for riots or protests.

I don't care about those. That's background noise. But in a place like Hong Kong, if you have general civil unrest or insurgency, I need to be there because it would be the most important place to be in the world. And so I went there in late June. By July 1st, I saw a clear sign of insurgency at the Legico break-in, which is a legislative council, which is basically like their parliament, right? So I was inside during the break-in. I went upstairs. I was with them, right? So I thought, wow, this is very strange. They just broke into the equivalent of the Hong Kong parliament, the Legco. And I went in there, and I was like, I can't believe this. This would be like breaking into the capital building in the United States. And so if this is the legitimate and not some sort of false flag, this would be a clear sign of insurgency. So everything has to be taken into context. Like if I saw that happen to some other country that they broke into a parliament, I might say,

well, that was just a riot. Everything must be taken into context. But anybody that calls those riots in Hong Kong either is working for, say, CCP or something in the Chinese Communist Party, or they just don't know anything about the difference between riots, protests, general civil unrest, and insurgency. These are all different animals. This is actually an insurgency, and it will not just stop. It may reduce for periods of time. It will wax and wane, but it will not just stop for something like that. Okay, I do want to back up a little bit, because you said that you're not a journalist, you're a war correspondent. What do you think

is the primary difference? Yes, you've gotten into some shit, and we'll talk about that too, but what is the primary difference from, if I'm a journalist in a war zone versus a war correspondent, what are my job duties? Why are they different? More specifically, combat. I do a lot of combat. There's a lot of war correspondence that really don't do much combat. Combat correspondent and a war correspondent are a little different as well. There's a lot of people that go to the wars, but they mostly stay in the more safe areas, going to the briefings, and that's actually most. And they might stick their toe into combat. I just do huge amount. ounce of combat. It's really a wonder I haven't been killed 10 times. In Hong Kong, some of the people

are like, oh, we've read some of your work online. It will stick with you where it's safe. And I'm like, maybe you haven't read enough work. Yeah, exactly. It's not safe with me. I do dangerous stuff. And I try to take every precaution. I do have a lot of training. I do have a lot of experience in combat. But one thing that that will tell you is that at least 50% of this is just luck, you know, just straight up luck. Like I mentioned, you got into some trouble. You were, embedded in Mosul and something went down and you crossed the line. Yeah, actually, you're talking about the gates of fire incident. And basically one of our guys got hit with a sniper. His name was Daniel Lama. He was okay. He got hit in the neck, but it was just a graze. He was okay. Then we were looking for

the snipers. And long story short, we got into a firefight. And then the commander, Carrilla, he's a three-star general now, actually. But at the time, he was a lieutenant colonel. He was a battalion commander of the Duce Four, which is the most incredible combat unit. I spent five months with them. They were unbelievable. I love those guys. But Eric, the commander, got shot three times right in front of me. While I was making photos, he got hit three times. One of the bullets broke one of his femurs in half. So he rolled and he's on the ground and he comes up and he continued to fight. There was a lot of shooting going on. And then we were in a kind of a small alleyway. It was quite loud. And the firefight was quite tight. Sergeant Major Rob Prosser showed up and he shot an al-Qaeda dude four times in the abdomen and blew one testicle off. And he continued. He continued to fight. He was still standing, actually, after being shot four times. He had a testicle blown off. That sounds horrible.

Oh, yeah. He was still standing. And he was shot at like three feet away. We're not talking 300 meters. He was shot right there, man, like a distance that you could literally spit on him, right? Rob fired 30 rounds. It was Iraq, super bright sun. But inside that little place where he was shooting was quite dark. So Rob, when he was firing his M4, he couldn't see the Al-Qaeda guy very well. well and he shot 30 rounds. That Al-Qaeda dude kept standing trying to fire a pistol, which was jammed or something. It wasn't working. So Rob threw his rifle down, and it landed at my feet. It was empty. And so Rob's in there doing hand-to-hand combat with the guy. And then I picked up Rob's rifle and got some ammunition. It was game on, man. We thought there were several other

Al-Qaeda dudes there. So I jacked the magazine in and I started firing to try to draw fire because it was dark in there. I wanted them to shoot at me so I could see where they're at so I can kill them. I had been shooting photos up until I picked up the rifle, right? And then I started firing the rifle. And then when some more soldiers came, I started shooting photos again. So I put the rifle back down and started shooting photos. So I've got photos of the entire event leading up to it, still firing going on hand-to-hand combat. And then I pick up a rifle. I started firing. Everything's finished. And I start shooting photos again. You know, I switch back to work correspondent. So what's the difference between a journalist and a work correspondent in that situation?

You know what I mean? There was plenty of opportunity to run away. I could have ran to safety because there was an army unit not far away. I think most journalists probably would not have had the skills and the training and just the aggressiveness to engage in combat to save American soldiers' lives. So yeah, there's a big difference between a war correspondent and just a freelance journalist. If somebody's going to kill a U.S. soldier, I'm not going to sit there and just document it. I'm going to do my best to stop it, even if it means I have to do things that you're not supposed to do as a quote-unquote journalist. It's incredible. And I'm not trying to minimize your contribution here, but I got to say, the guy who got shot several times and then engaged in combat, that guy is one bad mofo too. That is insane. Eric survived right back to combat the next year. He's the baddest dude I've ever met.

He's a three-star general now. I hear people all the time are like, American generals don't have any combat experience. I'm like, you're out of your mind, man. I mean, that may have been true 15 years ago or something. But I mean, right now, some of the American generals I know, they've seen more freaking combat than saving prior. Ryan, we have been at continuous war since 2001. Think about that.

This is 2020. We've been in continuous war since 2001. There's guys out there that done six, eight, ten combat tours. Like Eric, he did combat every year that I know up from 2004 to about 2016 or so, something like that. There may have been more, but like every year, combat, even as he increased in rank, he would still be out there. Wow. Yeah.

Well, let's discuss Hong Kong a little bit since that's your current focus, and that's where you are essentially based now. And we all know there's some big protests going on there right now. But I want to start with a little background on Hong Kong itself. It was handed off from Britain after, what, 100 years? Can you tell us a little bit about that kind of thing? Because a lot of people don't really understand how Hong Kong is China, but also kind of not. Okay. It's not China.

The whole what is China and what is not is a huge brainwashing operation from China. They're redrawing maps. A lot of the maps that are sold in the United States are made in China. For instance, the Movo Globes. Those globes are actually made in China. And China forced that company to include Taiwan, for instance, as part of China, right? And find them $40,000 because they had been making globes that did not include Taiwan as part of China, right? So this whole map redrawing and history redrawing sort of thing, people started coming over from the mainland about 450 years ago or so into Taiwan.

My family started coming to America in 1609. I'm not British. I'm American. And the Taiwanese who went there 400 years ago and 450 years ago around that time frame, they're not Chinese anymore. And then there was others, of course, who came after World War II due to the nationalist communist fight. China, they're constantly lying. They just covered up this virus, for instance, as much as they could. And now it's no way to cover it up. It's like Soviet Union tried to cover up Chernobyl for a while. But, you know, they rewrite history, any show of support for Hong Kong or Taiwan. If the Chinese Communist Party can get to you

in some way, they'll do it, whether it's economic or political or in some cases, put you in jail if you happen to be in their country. They'll certainly do it to Chinese on a daily basis. And so, yeah, So the idea that it's part of China is not up to what Chinese Communist Party decides. It comes down to how you can enforce your will or not. Ultimately, the world still plays on the law of the jungle. Bottom line. If you don't have the power to defend your land and there's somebody that wants to take it, they can take it and they will take it if they're that sort of person.

So China is expanding. They've taken Tibet. You know what they're doing in Xinjiang with the Uyghurs, you know, genocide. They're trying to take that. Taiwan, which is clearly a sovereign nation, you see many people frequently, they're like, why doesn't Taiwan just declare independence? I say, well, think about it. That would be like New Zealand declaring independence from South America. First of all, South America is not a country. It's a place like China, but somebody could come together, like the South American Communist Party,

let's say, and say Paraguay and Uruguay and Ecuador and all these places are all one country. That's basically what China has done over in Asia. And they could say, and New Zealand is our old territory, right? They could say that. And then people would say, well, why doesn't New Zealand declare independence? It's because they were never part of South America. And Taiwan has never been part of China. Never, ever. So to declare independence would be to sort of acknowledge that you were at one point part of that country, which gives credence to the claim that they were originally your government. Yeah, exactly. That would be counterproductive to declare independence when you just are independent. They say, but yeah, but you have our genes. You're

basically we're of the same genetic stock and therefore you fall under our authority. That's what they say to Chinese in America as well. That's terrifying having a kid who's half Taiwanese and a wife who's full Taiwanese American. Yeah, and think about what they can do if somebody works for an American company or in a university that does serious research or whatever. You've been in America for, you know, three generations or whatever, but you're really Chinese. And you know, and you still have family over here.

You owe us through your genetic line. You still are Chinese from China. That would be like British coming to me and saying, I'm still British and I should still be loyal to the Queen. I'm not British. I'm American. The same with the Taiwanese. They're not Chinese unless they say they are.

And then they feel like that in their heart. You know what I mean? Like Hong Kongers, as an example, just since June, there's been a dramatic decrease in the number of people in some of these polls, if you can trust polls, that Hong Kongers who now identify themselves as Hong Kongers. They no longer identify themselves as Chinese, but as Hong Kongers. And you'll even see it on T-shirts. They're starting to get that national and group identity, which they need if they're going to at some point that Hong Kong could be independent. I want to give people a little bit of a sense of history here because

Britain was in control of Hong Kong for a century, right? People need to know why Hong Kong, although adjacent to China was not part of China for such a long time because that's key to the history of what's going on here, the background of what's going on here. So what happened in Hong Kong that made it a protector of Britain for so long. Well, right. Let's widen that out. There is never any truth in the world without context. Context is absolutely crucial. And at that time in history, there was a huge amount of colonization going on in Africa and America, South America, all over the world, including all over Asia, French, of course, Germans, the whole party was there, the Dutch, the Spanish, Portuguese, British were doing it.

And so they were into Hong Kong for a very long time. And finally, they turned it over to the Chinese Communist Party in 1997. Now, the Chinese Communist Party likes to spin up now that they've got this ancient history that goes back 4,000 years or whatever. But Hong Kong is much older, actually. The Republic of China did not form until the late 40s, as you know. So, I mean, we're talking after World War II. This is a post-World War II country, right? And so the China that we see now is hobbled together much in the way that the Soviet Union was hobbled together. It's a lot of disparate peoples, the very different histories, like, for instance, the Tibetans or the Uyghurs, and so many, I mean, huge amalgam of peoples. But they've tried to hobble this together and try to pretend that they have domain over 1.3 or 4 billion people. or whatever, but in reality, the promises of the Chinese Communist Party for generations have been security and prosperity.

Think about that for a minute in context of what's going on now with the economy. Security and prosperity. Think about that in context to the Wuhan virus now. They don't have security and they don't have prosperity. It's plummeting right now. And so this is some of the main glue of holding them together is security and gold. And so if that gold dries up and the security is no longer there and the PLA doesn't have the power that it had. PLA is the People's Liberation Army for people who don't know the terminology here.

Because I think a lot of people don't know that that's the Chinese Army. They're thinking, what the heck is that? Right. The People's Liberation Army who has 17 or 18 little bases in Hong Kong, actually, a lot of people say that PLA can invade Hong Kong. Don't they know? And I'm like, I can see them right in front of me. There's a base I can see it from my hotel room. They're here.

People's Liberation Army. Often people will say it's the Chinese Army. In reality, it's the army for the Chinese Communist Party, right? In reality, an American equivalent would be like the Republican or the Democrat Army, a one party system where the Republicans of one or the Democrats of one and now the army is theirs or it was an army that they stood up to begin with. And so think about that for a minute. If the Democrats or the Republicans owned the entire U.S.

and police system, the other party would be gone. You know what I mean? It would either be gone or you would be co-opted. Imagine if the Republicans or the Democrats had complete power over all of our police and army and intelligence services. The other side would be gone. And so that's what you have in China. The People's Liberation Army is not the Army for the People's Republic of China. It's the Army of the Chinese Communist Party. Why then, after being a protector of Britain, did Hong Kong then go back to China? That was the agreement. This is kind of like the lease, the century-long lease ended. What happened here that now Hong Kong is set to become a part of China?

I didn't mention this before, but I wanted to become an exchange student in the 90s. I did. I ended up in the former East Germany, but I originally chose Hong Kong. And my parents vetoed the idea because they said, look, Hong Kong is slated to go back to Chinese control the year that you're there. And my parents, of course, had the memory of the Berlin Wall where they built the wall in Germany and people who were trapped behind it working or visiting family. were told they could go back and then we're told, no, you're not, you're not going anywhere, you're stuck here forever now. And that's terrifying. So my parents thought, there's no way we're

sending her kid to Hong Kong and then having him become part of communist China while he's there on an exchanger in high school. Like, not going to happen. So what was going on at that time where this suddenly switches hands from Great Britain to China? What's going on there? Oh, not just at that time. Remember, China had already taken Tibet in the 50s, right? China is expansionist. They are the ultimate at this point, they are the new colonizers, right? They're like the new Britain, only even more powerful. So was Tibet a separate country until then? I had no idea. A separate area, for sure. Tibet's another thing that I watch as well. I watch very closely. The point is that China is very expansionist and colonial, and they are the worst colonialist ever. I mean, they've murdered

unknown numbers of Tibetans and Uyghurs and others, including inside of what you might call the core of China. They want to take Hong Kong. In 1997, of course, the British Empire, it's not much of an empire anymore. It's more of a neighborhood that's still falling apart. So they didn't have the power to stand up to the Chinese Communist Party. So Britain knew that the writing was on the wall that they couldn't militarily keep it. And this is the law of the jungle. If you don't have the power with a big P to keep it, then you're going to lose it if you're faced up with a voracious wolf-like Chinese Communist Party. So Britain basically bowed out and was basically like, okay, we're doing the right thing. And the Chinese Communist Party is taking back what is ours for

thousands of years. Well, the Chinese Communist Party just formed after World War II, right? People's Republic of China. And so it's not as if they have been around that long. It's a synthetic construct is what it really comes down to. They made the one country, two systems lie. The diplomats at the time who actually agreed to do this and said, okay, one country, two systems, they were at least as sophisticated then as I am at this age now. And there's no way that they did that in good faith, knowing that Hong Kong was actually going to get a nice, smooth, welcome into our big family.

Hong Kong is extremely wealthy, it's strategically placed. There is no way that CCP was going to let that roll away. That's a pearl that they're going to grab. You're listening to The Jordan Harbinger Show with our guest, Michael Jan. We'll be right back. Thanks for listening and supporting the show. And to learn more and get links to all the great discounts you just heard from our amazing sponsors, visit Jordan Harbinger.com slash deals.

Don't forget we have that worksheet for today's episode, so you can make sure you solidify your understanding of the key takeaways from Michael Jan. That link is in the show notes at Jordan Harbinger.com slash podcast. If you'd like some tips on how to subscribe to the show, just go to Jordan Harbinger.com slash subscribe. Subscribing to the show is absolutely free. It just means you get all of the latest episodes downloaded automatically to your podcast player so you don't miss a single thing. And now back to our show with Michael Jan. By way of background, a lot of people don't know what one country, two systems mean. So when Hong Kong was handed off from Britain back to the Chinese

Communist Communist Party as a part of China, the province of Hong Kong, they were a huge percentage of the Chinese economy. I think at one point the GDP of Hong Kong was like one third of China as a whole. So they were allowing this one country to systems where Hong Kong would have their democratic elections and be able to control things and have autonomy because they kind of didn't have a choice. Now China's developed so much economically that I think Hong Kong is only 3% of GDP in China. So they have other cities and they realize, hey, we don't really have to play by your

rules anymore because we don't really need you to be happy anymore in order to be a part of China. We can kind of do whatever we want. And so instead of having one country, two systems for, I think, the next several decades, China is starting to exert its influence in ways that are through the legislature and other ways in order to force Chinese way of life onto the citizens of Hong Kong, which beforehand were essentially a lot more free, right? Yeah, well, that's problematic, though. For instance, yes, they are trying to force their ways. For instance, trying to force people to learn Mandarin instead of Cantonese. The language of Hong Kong is Cantonese, mostly by far. But it's not quite that simple. For instance, China does need Hong Kong because

of the special status that Hong Kong has with countries like the United States. Basically, Hong Kong is Chinese Communist parties. It's their ATM. It's their bank machine. For hard currency, they need Hong Kong. And if the United States in particular, totally, revoked special status for Hong Kong, that will be very, very damaging for Chinese Communist Party, for China in general, and for many people in the United States as well. Otherwise, we probably would have already done it. If they didn't need Hong Kong as badly as they do, they probably would have rolled in with tanks already. But the fact is that we can fire back without firing a shot just by making economic and political tweaks to our way we do business with them.

The problem set the Chinese Communist Party faces right now. They just had swine. flu, army worms. They had problems with fuel prices at some point. They've had problems with their economy. They're unrelated to everything that's going on now. And then they've had the tariffs with President Trump with putting tariffs on them. Also going after Huawei, you know, the telecommunications company and all sorts of other things to try to corral in the BRI, the Belt and Road initiative. They've overplayed their hand and they basically angered a lot of people who were letting them slide for years, they're now getting some severe pushback. That's why people like me have come out of the woodwork in recent years, and we've been focused on China because they are on the march. They're

building these islands in the South China Sea. And when they build these man-made islands, they just dredge up sand from the bottom of the sea. They build an island. And then they say, okay, everything around here is Chinese territorial waters. Think about that. They're busy seizing the South China Sea, which is a huge and incredibly important waterway. They can eventually, at the rate that they're going now, if they can take Taiwan, if they can take the South China Sea, they can eventually take Japan. And once they do that, the ultimate target clearly is the United States. So on the menu, clearly is South China Sea, Taiwan, of course, Hong Kong, and finally Japan, but that's a big one, because they'll be able to create.

triple Japanese economy if they control the South China Sea and some other things. And that's where they're headed. And so, for instance, the telecommunications, Hawaii, you probably know what I'm talking about. This can greatly affect our relationship with the United Kingdom. Using Chinese telecommunications systems, they'll be able to spy on everything that we do, all of our corporations, everything, all of our communications like now. A lot of spying already happens, but it will facilitate spying like has never been seen before and only in China's hands. Right, you're talking about telecommunication systems and technology like 5G technology being run by China, but I want to focus on Hong Kong as well.

Right now, Hong Kong's government is a little confusing for a lot of folks. Do you think the government of Hong Kong represents the people of Hong Kong? Because it sounds like their chief executive, they are able to run for office sort of only with the permission of the Chinese government. Or how does it work? Well, Carrie Lamb, the chief executive, which would be sort of like the mayor, the mayor, of Hong Kong, if you will. She's clearly a puppet of Beijing, as are the police, about 38,000 in the police force. Now, they still have elections. They do not have universal suffrage in Hong Kong,

but clearly the government does not represent the majority of the people. That's clear. I've just been in six months of the fighting there, and I'm going to be back soon. I wonder if they're even going to let me in. Before all this, until recent years, the average Hong Konger was very apolitical. They didn't like to talk about politics. It's like if you kept the money coming, People are making money. They like to go shopping and going vacations and stuff. They weren't really into politics. It's like a lot of Americans, it's like once you are in the military and you go to a war,

suddenly you're really into politics when you come home, right? So a lot of Hong Kongers are the same. Suddenly when they started being abused by the Hong Kong police who are clearly puppets of Beijing, they started becoming extremely interested in politics like they never have been before. And so now they're extremely interested. and they do not believe that the bulk of the government, the current government, represents the bulk of the Hong Kongers. Now, there's a lot of weird stuff that seems a little sketchy going on with the Hong Kong police,

and I know you're in the thick of it during these riots, protests, and other things, you see these reports, and I don't know how credible they are, but there'll be some photo, and it's like, here's the serial number on this cop, and it's the same as these other cops, and this one should be a female, but it's really a guy. People are saying these are fake police or these uniform. forms have been slapped together or the cops are watching gangs beat up protesters and doing nothing. What's going on with the cops in Hong Kong?

All the above. A lot of people are saying that some of them are from mainland and they're actually PLA soldiers, basically Chinese soldiers. And I don't know if that's true. I'm up very close to them all the time. And videotaping, I've done hundreds of hours of live stream videotaping on my Facebook. When I'm right there, I never see actual evidence. And I'll ask people, do you hear anybody speaking?

Mandarin here among the police. And I'll come up with my real great Sinheiser 416 microphone that I'm doing this interview on and have it very close listening to the cops talking and then I'll have people listening to it later. Do you hear any accents that are not from Hong Kong? Do you hear anybody speaking Mandarin instead of Cantonese? And I haven't picked it up from that on the ground level. And so I don't have any proof of that. There are a lot of big cops there which are kind of suspicious, but bottom line, no proof. But are Are they acting as puppets of Beijing?

Obviously, that is like as clear as day. If you come over with me and spend a couple weeks, I'll take you out into the fighting, and you'll see for yourself. Hold on, let me book a ticket to Hong Kong right now. I would love to do that. The thing is, just having a six-month-old baby, I'm like, oh, I probably shouldn't do that. I wouldn't do that. The long-handed germ was not going to let you do that.

No, my wife would be like, I don't think so. That said, Jordan of 10 years ago would have been on a plane tomorrow. What caused the current unrest? Why suddenly are people protesting? I think a lot of people don't understand. They see the protests and they think, oh, it's something, something Chinese rule. But if they've always sort of been doing this and Hong Kong, quote unquote, went back to China in 97, 98, why now? What's going on now that triggered this? There were many things that actually triggered it. There was one final straw that was the extradition bill. And that was a bill that would allow, if passed into law, that would allow, suspect. and criminal trials to be extradited over to China to face trial, which would be insane. That would be like somebody from, you know, Los Angeles or New York or Florida being extradited to China for trial from a sovereign area, one country, two systems. At least they're supposed to have two systems, right? There's a booksellers store over near Causeway Bay. I've been to it

is closed, but I mean, I've been to it numerous times. They were selling books there that the Chinese Communist Party did not like. And so what happened? They kidnapped them. They kidnapped Hong Kong booksellers. They kidnapped some of them right out of Hong Kong and they kidnapped others who were on vacation in Thailand. They kidnapped them out of Thailand. They were on vacation in Phuket, I think, or Patsya and kidnapped them. The next thing you know, they showed up in China. So, I mean, this is the sort of thing. We're talking about prison rules. I mean, the Chinese Communist Party are absolutely criminal and everything that they do. They're basically a giant state mafia. They're trying to do things legal, like the mafia wearing nice suits and ties and sending

their kids to nice schools and stuff, but they're still mafia and they behave as mafia. And Hong Kongers greatly respect the rule of law. And the Hong Kongers greatly want the rule of law. They'll never get that with China. So at the extradition bill, that was a straw, snap, that was the audible snap in June, and I got on the airplane. So this bill would allow mainland China to extradite. criminals from Hong Kong in China where I think they have what like a 99.9% conviction rate. And these are crimes that are not, well, this person murdered this other person, so we're going to extradite them. This is, well, you sold a book that detailed the affair that the prime minister had. So that's a crime against the state. We're going to go to your free city

slash country, take you out of there and throw you in a place where you're never going to get out of prison, which, of course, we heard about human rights violations in Chinese prisons as well, and that's a whole separate subject. But that's terrifying. So people are saying no way, because even someone who's, let's say, not a criminal, if you can suddenly disappear from Hong Kong without due process, that's scary for everybody, a student who writes a paper that's maybe a little bit too aggressive towards the Communist Party, people who want democratic change, people who want democracy at all. This is a massive chilling effect, and I think it sounds like what you're saying is Hong Kongers view this as the first of many steps towards essentially

authoritarian rule over Hong Kong. Oh, clearly. The Hong Kongers who've enjoyed freedom for so long, they don't want to lose that freedom. They're in this very tough situation, for instance, that Poland used to be in. I compare it often to Poland, and they were in a very difficult situation as well, where this authoritarian Soviet Union, Poland wanted to split off from it, bottom line. Poland did succeed in the end after a lot of struggle, went on for years. I tell Hong Kongers that all the time. You know, Hong Kongers are in a hurry to be in a hurry. You're Hong Kongers, so you're like New Yorkers. You're always like, ah, we'll get it done by noon. It's like, you won't get this done by noon, and it won't be done by June, and it won't be done by Christmas. This is a long process.

You will not suddenly win. That's just not going to happen. You have to be patient. You have to be courageous, which they are. They're learning patience. They're very super intelligent people. I've never seen people fight with their mind as well as Hong Kongers do. For instance, with their information campaign, they got the United States to pass the Human Rights and Democracy Act in record time between June and Thanksgiving of 2019 because President Trump finally signed off after the House and Senate made their very positive votes for the Human Rights and Democracy Act. And then President Trump signed off, I think Thanksgiving or right before. And that was record time. And that was all because the Hong Kongers are so good. at messaging and they got the key people in the United States to pay attention and they got me

on an airplane and others are still coming. So yeah, they're very good mind fighters, but they're going to have to be patient. Why might this destabilize China? You mentioned Poland. You mentioned similarities between what's going on in Hong Kong and the solidarity movement in Poland. I know that this is your area of expertise, but why might something that's happening in one little area destabilize China? Okay. There's a problem set. and Hong Kong is just part of that problem set. There are so many problems on China's big board. For instance, right now they have the Wuhan virus.

That's a serious problem. They've had the swine flu. They've had the tariffs. They've had Xinjiang problems. They've had so many problems. If their economy collapses, as happened with the Soviet Union, then Hong Kong suddenly is in a position to become independent. But the main thing to do is don't give up and continue.

continue to struggle and wait for your moment of opportunity. Poland didn't just beat back to Soviet Union and get free. They didn't. Soviet Union had a huge problem set. For instance, Afghanistan, they had invaded Afghanistan. And through the United States, through the CIA and the U.S. military as well, we were supplying Stinger missiles and other things through Pakistan and a lot of aid. Saudis were helping with direct aid. And they also manipulated oil prices because a huge amount of the Soviet economy is based on oil. So we picked. a lot of their military there in Afghanistan and we were bleeding them. And then President Reagan, you know, his strategy on Soviet Union was not containment, but destruction of the Soviet Union,

not containment. Everybody else had been, let's just contain them. Ronald Reagan showed up and it's like containment hell. We're going to knock them out. So he started doing all these different things, for instance, pinning them in Afghanistan and then attacking their economy in every direction that he could. We got help from the Saudis manipulating oil prices. He did the SDI Strategic Defense Initiative, which was Star Wars, did a huge buildup of the U.S. military. The Soviets tried to keep up with us on the military buildup, and they couldn't do it. And then we did sanctions against the Polish economy. So the problem set that the Soviet Union faced was enormous and it was growing.

And suddenly their economy just couldn't take it anymore. And boom. And so hyperinflation kicked in, Soviet Union fell apart. And without really firing a shot. Will that happen with China? Pretty high probability. Will it happen without firing a shot? Let's roll the dice. Nobody knows. Roll the dice. My guess is that it would be violent. My guess on the Soviet Union would that it would have been violent, but it was not heavily violent anyway. But the bottom line is, is if we don't crack CCP now, they're just getting bigger and they're getting stronger. They're going to eventually at this rate try to take Taiwan through military force if necessary. And Eventually, they're just growing. And so we're going to have to face them now. Now's the time. So this is why Americans should care, because this has economic implications. It has, frankly, freedom and democracy implications for not only our friends and allies in Asia, but all over the world.

Oh, absolutely. Absolutely. I mean, the Soviet Union, which at its peak, I think, had maybe a third of the economy of the United States, was still extremely influential. And China is almost on parity economically. They're very powerful economically, right? And they are extremely aggressive. A lot of people can say this or that about the United States who haven't really studied up much what's happened since World War II. The United States is always in some war. Of course we are. It's just we've been in war almost every year since the United States was born in 1776. But at the same time, our presence in, for instance, Europe has brought Europe from being basically the Middle East. Europe was worse than the Middle East. Today we're always like, look at the Middle East. it's this, it's that. That's Europe before the United States planted troops all over the place, right? China's not like that. When China's going to Africa in different places, they're just squeezing them dry. Whereas the United States, you went to East Germany.

I was in East Germany as well. The difference between East Germany and West Germany were incredible. I've spent about four years in Germany, right? East Korn Doge. Yeah? Yeah. So I spent four years in Germany and another couple in Poland. every communist country, they're just squeezed and just drained of everything.

It's a terrible place to live. It's like one step away from actual hell, right? And so in China, when they're going to places like Africa, they're just squeezing on polluting the place. Look how polluted China is. When you go to China, it is unbelievable. It's like you need a machete to cut through the smog, even in Beijing, which is not their most polluted city.

It's unbelievably polluted. Imagine what they'll do to rivers in Africa. Imagine what they'll do in South America in Mexico and other places as they try to gain influence. No, we need to crack them now and not put it in kids' terms either. Like, oh, we're just trying to contain them. We're just trying to teach them. We've tried to teach them for generations. Do you think the coronavirus is going to put a damper on the protests in Hong Kong?

We sort of touched on this earlier. Are people going to be scared to go out? I mean, this is already in Hong Kong. It's already in the area. It may put a damper on temporarily just due to normal. biological reasons, but it's not going to end it because there is an insurgency. And the Hong Kongers are so energized and mobilized at this point that they're just not going to suddenly quit.

The other insurgencies that I've been in and the others that I've studied that I have not been in, sometimes you'll see periods, for instance, Poland, you'll see periods where they kind of wax and wane, right? You might even argue that 2019 in June was not the real kickoff for this. Look at the 2014 umbrella revolution in Hong Kong. Hong Kong. So, I mean, that was kind of really a big kickoff there. And then there was other things before in like 2009. There were other things that's happened in Hong Kong and they just keep growing and getting bigger and bigger. So even if this were to go dormant for a while, you would be

making a bad bet to think that it's over. It's like thinking the San Andreas fault is finished. You mentioned before Chinese information war. And to understand information war, you have to understand insurgency, trying to understand one without the other. is like trying to understand physics without math, is what you told me before we kicked things off here. I know you wrote an entire book about this, so it's going to be tough for you to probably put this in a little container here. But tell us about what Chinese information war means. This is beyond like broadcasting a radio station or having a couple of news reports or a newspaper. There's more to the story here. This is like such a massive global effort. Right. More specifically, to understand

insurgency, you must understand information war. There is no insurgency without information War. There are many information wars without insurgency. Information wars are going on. We are in the middle of them all the time. Information wars around us are like going into a crowded stadium and all those different voices you hear, but there's some that drown out all the others or most of the others. And one of those is the Chinese information war. Like for instance, persuading the world that Taiwan is part of China and that Hong Kong is part of China, persuading Hong Kongers that Hong Kong is part of China. A lot of us a Jedi mine trick, right? Well, the South China Sea is actually Chinese because of this, that, and the other. And the thing is, is they get maps redrawn. They sponsor museums.

I've been to many of those museums. They will build an information ecosystem that is so vast, so wide and deep and tall, you don't realize that you're in it. The information war is all from China is about gaining world dominance. So there's many sub-campaigns to either split, for instance, Japan from Korea. I've written about that. extensively and then to split Korea from the United States and to split Japan from the United States because that defense triangle between Japan, Korea, and the United States is crucial for Asia. And so they targeted that in particular. They have not been successful in their targeting of the relationship between Japan and the United

States. Our relationship is very strong and it's not getting weaker. It's as strong as it's ever been. When you say museum exhibits and things like that, before we did the show, you were mentioning that there are a museum tours where the Chinese Communist Party will invite museum curators from all over the world and show them alternative facts, like a Chinese version of world history that's so subtle and so non-obviously propaganda, but still completely skewed. You don't really detect the bias, because in many ways the history is more or less sound. It's just very, very skewed, and it sounds innocent enough.

It sounds like every country probably does that for their own reasons, but you're saying this is more nefarious. Oh, yeah. The information campaigns are so big. One of the things that they do is they pick subjects that cause you to automatically start fighting about that subject and stop talking about what they're doing. Like Holocaust denial. If somebody says that never happened, I'm like you're a freaking moron right winger. Like I'm not listening to anything you say. Exactly, exactly. To understand the current narrative, you have to understand the context. Again, without context, there's no truth. Most people believe that Japanese actually kidnapped 200,000 women, which is complete bullshit. It did not happen. There were comfort women. That's true. Comfort women are called Ionfu in Japanese language, and the brothels are called Ianjo.

They had them here in Thailand as well. And as you may know, Korea was part of Japan between 1910 and 1945. There were Korean women that were used as prostitutes during the war, and it's a very sensitive issue for Koreans and Japanese both. And it's a very sensitive issue. And it's It's a hot button issue. And it sounds like what you're saying is China is using this issue to formant a wedge between Korea and Japan because a weaker set of Asian allies means a stronger China, relatively speaking. Right. The Chinese created this issue which did not ever exist.

It really started in the 90s. In 1979, a Japanese author named Yoshido Seiji, he wrote a book called My War Crimes. he said that he kidnapped, I think about 203 women on Jeju Island, which is an island off the southern tip of South Korea. Now, immediately a bunch of Korean historians and Japanese journalists went to Jeju and tried to find if this is true. Now, remember, there are no statute of limitations on war crimes. So if somebody had actually kidnapped and raped women, there's a lot of records that still exist. They could actually go to prison. Koreans and Japanese were like, no, it's not true.

It never happened. And then the guy Yoshido Saji who wrote the book, My War Crimes, he admitted to it. He goes, oh, okay, sorry about that. I was trying to sell books. You know, you got to puff things up a little bit to sell books. Long story short, it died. And then it picked up again when he wrote a sequel in 1983 or so. And then the Asahi Shimbun published more than 50 stories as if it's true at this point.

You know, later they say the Japanese kidnapped all these women from Japan and the Japanese army. You're like, they were comfort women. Comfort women were quite real. But the fact is, now we get back to China. A lot of people know what happened on June 4th, 1989, Tiananmen Square, right? So there was an uprising in China against the communist, and the Chinese put it down brutally. And the world said, what are you doing? Europe, the United States, the whole world was like, what are you doing?

You just murdered all these young people. The Chinese Communist Party actually had serious political internal problems at that point, and they almost fell apart. So what did China do? They do what they do all the time. They lie and they change the subject. After Tiananmen Square, China started in the early 90s going, what about Japan? What about those comfort women? What about Nanjing? What about this? What about that? People are like, yeah, what about Japan? China's like, why doesn't Japan apologize for, you know, Nanjing? And then the Japanese, doing what Japanese do, they apologized in 1993 with the Kono statement. He actually apologized and said, oh, yes, we apologized for the comfort women thing because Japanese apologize. Like if you spill something on me, I will apologize to you immediately. I'll just be like, oh, I'm sorry, even though you spilled it on me. English will do that as well. And so will Japanese, because that's their social, smoothing, Kono specifically apologize. Well, that doesn't smooth things out with Koreans or with mainland Chinese. When you

apologize to them, they're like, you just admitted guilt. There's a big difference. They take it as an admission of guilt and we want another apology and we want money for it. And the Japanese are like, but we just apologize. And the Koreans are like, you apologize. You just admitted to it. You're listening to The Jordan Harbinger show with our guest, Michael Jan. We'll be right back after this. Thank you for listening and supporting the show. Your support of our advertisers keeps us on the air. And to learn more and get links to all the great discounts you just heard so you can check out those amazing sponsors, visit Jordan Harbinger.com slash deals. And don't forget the worksheet for today's episode. That link is in the show notes at Jordan Harbinger.com slash podcast.

If you're listening to us in the Overcast player, please click that little star next to the episode. We really appreciate it. And now for the conclusion of our episode with Michael Jan. It sounds like what you're saying is then Tiananmen Square was such a massive wake-up call for the Chinese Communist Party because things almost fell apart that they decided, look, what we need to do is redirect the conversation to how we've been wronged, how other people have been wronged by other countries in Asia, namely Japan, so that people aren't just focusing on human rights violations in China, the idea that we have all these internal problems. They wanted to change the narrative through using these information war techniques, right? Oh, yeah. They changed the narrative and they were

very effective at it. They did a lift and shift. In the beginning, they have the clear appearance of being just deflections, right? They then evolved from just deflections into, hey, this is working. People pay attention to this. Then they seem to have shifted from deflection to attacking specific lines, for instance, relations between Korea and Japan or relations between Korea and the United States. Think about the long game here. Now, if you're the long game in your Chinese or your Koreans, you're like, try to get the Americans on the Korean side and tell the Japanese that you need to apologize, which we've done, which angers the Japanese and attacks our relationship. And then eventually lift and shift and say, well, America, you told Japan, they should apologize.

Look at the things you did with sex slaves in World War II. Look at the things you did to Koreans after World War II in the Korean War and the brothels that were run right beside American bases up until like now, 2020. One of the papers I think we found some years ago was at the University of New Hampshire. They were talking about that, about shifting over and starting to sue the United States. I mean, these information wars are deep and they're very complex, and they're so big that it's very difficult to tell that you're in it. When you say you can't really tell that you're in it, you mean things like they're so all-encompassing. They're attacking on so many different channels that it's not just an obvious piece of propaganda, right?

It's not just somebody standing on camera saying everything's fine here and there's buildings on fire in the background. It's like Wikipedia, museum exhibits, textbooks, things are all changing the narrative in a very all-encompassing way, including this 50-cent army. Can you speak a little bit about that? Because I feel like I've been encountering these 50-cent army soldiers, if you will, quite a bit when I go online and look, read, talk, discuss China, and they end up in my inbox. This is something new for me. Right. Well, when you're interviewing people like me or Brigadier General U.S. Air Force retired Robert Spalding, you will be attacked by the 50-cent army. That's sort of a nickname for the people who may work for Beijing in one capacity or another. For instance, they come on my sites all the time,

or you can see some articles come out that are clearly sponsored by them or somebody that's in that cloud structure. Those are people that engage in information warfare, for instance, in social media, or let's say comments in newspapers, letters to the editor. They got the moniker 50 cent army because people say they get 50 cent for each post that they make. So why do that just to create a narrative that looks like everybody agrees on the same thing or that you're vastly outnumbered if you disagree? Right. Many people, including Americans, who are deeply inside of the information war will say, whoa, whoa, whoa, you're out of your mind. You're like probably saying conspiracy theory. You're probably saying Israel did 9-11 or something. You know what I mean? It's that level. But the thing is, when the information wars are really successful like that, if you stand out and start pointing to things, even though they're really true, you're bound to get a lot of pushback.

And so the 50 cent army will come back with their canned responses. That's why you'll probably notice this when they attack you. You'll probably notice a lot of the same responses in different words, but it'll be the same talking points over and over and over. In fact, the same talking points they hit you with will be the same talking points they hit me with. They just fill in the blank, right? And so you'll see that patterns are very clear.

They'll do deflection, for instance. if you start talking about what they're doing to Uyghurs, they'll come on and go, what did the United States do to the Native Americans? What did you do to the Indians? What did the Japanese do here? They'll go after Japanese. They'll go after the United States. They'll deflect and then try to get you on the defense.

It's just an argument tactic that like lawyers use. You know, it's a normal tactic. I know there have been some kind of obvious mistakes. Now, this is an all-encompassing Info War strategy, so it's a little tough. But you mentioned examples of this going wrong or tactical mistakes, such as announcing news of an attack before it actually happens, where somebody doesn't get the memo and releases the press release a day early and the attack happens later.

Can you give the example of that? Because that's crazy. That's like something straight out of a movie or a spy novel. We've seen some of it in Hong Kong. When it's happened a few times, I've been out in the fighting. There's a lot of information coming at us because there's the OScent people and others, the open source intelligence, Twitter and all these guys are all watching all the feeds, right? And they're feeding it out.

And some of us on the ground are watching the fighting on the ground and we're watching what they're telling us. Every once in a while, it'll be like, hey, there was just a report. There was a fire bombing down at so-and-so. And I'll be like, I didn't see one. Did you? I'm like, no, I didn't see one. Obviously, it didn't happen here. And boom, there's a fire bombing. You're like, you know, it might have been just 30 minutes ago that the report came out, but it didn't even happen yet. I'm not saying all the Molotovs are false flags. They're clearly not. I think the vast majority are real because I'm out there with them when they do them. I watch them do them all the time.

But there's clearly some are false flags, or they're reported in advance, like mysteriously. But this definitely happened. That's pretty funny. I would love a little news article or something where we can sort of bust them on that, because that's almost something where when I read it, I go, did that really happen? Because that's such an obvious mistake that it seems like you would at least check. But I guess if you're coordinating an attack and you're not within visual or earshot of the attack, you might make that kind of mistake.

Or the timelines off by a few minutes or an hour, and you just don't notice. What do you think is going to happen in Hong Kong? You mentioned this isn't just protests. It's an insurgency. It just doesn't look like what we see in Iraq or Afghanistan or elsewhere. Is this something that's likely to evolve into some sort of proper insurgency? Or will what we see now as just civil unrest and civil disobedience, will that just continue

in its current form instead? I don't know. It is a proper insurgency. It's a clear insurgency. How do we define insurgency? Because it just looks like rioting to me, you know, to everybody who's watching. Yeah, because they don't know what they're seeing. It's like taking somebody to the doctor and we see a headache and doctor says, I see, you know. It's a tumor. Yeah. Yeah, it can be very different. If it were just riots, I wouldn't be there. I wouldn't waste my time.

Rioting would be no threat to them. It would be no threat to the Chinese Communist Party specifically. I'm not talking about China. Rioting is something separate altogether. Rioting is just a bunch of people doing hoodlum stuff, right? On the continuum, it starts at protest. And then from there, you move into civil unrest and general civil unrest. And then on the continuum, you move into insurgency. And they are all different animals. And they can look the same, but they're actually quite different. There's a lot of protest in many insurgencies. And there can even be riots in insurgencies.

A riot can be part of a protest, but a riot usually is something very finite. Somebody does something and then a bunch of people react in a very bad way. like burn something down or whatever, turn over a car. So that's a riot, right? And then it's over in the next day or a few days or whatever, it's finished. That's a riot. It's usually some highly emotional response to something. Protest or something else. Let's say teachers are protesting low pay and they want higher pay. So you often see teachers say going on strike. Strike is a form of protest, right? Or they're picketing or whatever. But that's healthy protest, right? Protest are part of a healthy country's background. We have protests all of the United States. That's why we have

the First Amendment, freedom of speech. We have these release valves by having freedom of speech. And also, Hong Kong is known as a city of protest. They have many protests that doesn't have anything to do with insurgency or China or anything else. They have protests over the cost of the ferry or something, right? That's just normal. That's background noise. Those are going on every day around the world. And so protests tend to be quite small as or short lived as a function of the size of the population, say 7.4 million people in Hong Kong and let's say 2,000 people turn out to a protest. That's fairly insignificant for the size of the population, right? And usually once you fix that, they're finished. Like it's finished. You never hear from again because they got the pay they needed

and it's done. Now, general civil unrest is something larger. That's where you, got 7.4 million people and a million people turn out for a protest. That's general civil unrest, or it's a very massive protest. But if it's just a protest, if the government fixes something, if it's a specific item that they fix, like the extradition bill in Hong Kong, then it might be finished, right? Now, this is important to remember what I just said, the extradition bill. If they fix that, it might be finished, right? But in general civil unrest, often it's a lot of large set of problems that people are protesting. Like it's this, it's that. It's the other five demands, not one less. It's not just five demands. If you really get there on the ground, it's like a whole

laundry list of problems, like housing and many, many issues, right? Five demands, not one less. It's just great messaging from the Hong Kongers on letting people know that they're not just rioting. They have very specific demands. They don't have endless demands. They're saying we have five demands, Not one less. That's it. So they're being very specific. So that's messaging. That tells you something. Oh, it's not about that extradition bill, is it? Right? And then you get there on their ground. You're like, it's about all these other things. And how did you get a million point seven point seven point four million people? You've got a broad cross-section of the people and a substantial portion of the population out there protesting about many different things. The situation can't be solved with one thing. And so what's very important in civil unrest and delineates and separates civil unrest from insurgency is that in civil unrest, most of the people will still see the government as mostly legitimate. They still see it as my government, right? Like when we protest the United States government does something, I protest about them all the time in writing, but I still respect them as my government. I don't

want to overthrow it and just make some tweaks here and there. Now, when you get into insurgency, you actually want to overthrow the government. So now you've got a huge section of the people that want to change the way the government fundamentally works, make universal suffrage and do many other fundamental changes. Now you're in insurgency. Now they've already taken the extradition bill off the table and yet the honcars are still on the streets because it's beyond that. It's inside of insurgency. That's why when people were asking me, okay, they're backing off of the extradition bill. Well, the protesters quit. And I'm like, well, they're not really protesters at this point.

They're insurgents. And insurgents are not going to quit for that because it's more profound. There's no one thing that you can do except for China to say, okay, you're on your own, which they're not going to do. There's no one thing that can ameliorate the situation and turn the insurgency back into just normal Hong Kong. They're attempting to smash this with the police with the gang activity that we saw. What do you think China will do or what do you think they'll attempt to do about this if things continue or if things escalate? Well, I mean, that's the big question. I mean, a lot of people are like, well, they'll just invade or whatever. I don't know.

I mean, the Chinese Communist Party might not know. Xi might not know what he's going to do. He might make up his mind tomorrow. But you see, right now, the black swan just flew over and squirted Wuhan virus out over China, right? And so a black swan is a totally unexpected event. Now they've got a pandemic on their hands that could reshape politics. takes throughout the world. If the Wuhan virus spreads over to the United States, which it will, if it has a big impact in the United States, let's say 50,000 people die from it. And then people

look back and go, well, President Trump, why didn't you do a travel ban? 50,000 people died from this. It will probably lose the election. And if that's going to happen, if 50,000 people in the United States are going to die from this, it'll probably happen before summer. So it will absolutely affect the elections. The same can happen internally inside of China. We don't know. what's happening in there. But the Chinese have some idea. They're there. It's difficult for any individual to know the bigger picture when they crush down on their information internally and externally. But it could have a huge effect on the internal workings of China if the Wuhan virus goes out of control. Because remember, that's hitting their economy already. Tariffs have hit their economy,

swine flu hit it, army worms, and so many other things, their economy is not in the best shape. If their economy collapses, my guess, the Chinese Communist Party will probably collapse. Why would the Chinese Communist Party collapse if they can't force their will on Hong Kong? How does that really work? Oh, not Hong Kong specifically. For instance, when the Soviet Union collapsed, they didn't collapse simply because of Poland. There was a problem set. The courage of Poland spread.

Czech people, the Slovakians and the Hungarians, they're already pretty courageous to begin with. Courage and cowardice both spread. Any military leaders know this. If you show cowardice in front of your men or your women, it'll spread like a virus, right? If you show courage, it will spread like a virus. We saw what Poland did. Their courage spread. You know where it spread to?

It spread to Tiananmen Square. It spread all across the East Block all the way over to China. That uprising, these general uprisings against communism, is part of what led to Tiananmen Square. That's all part of a larger context, right? Tiananmen Square wasn't just an internal thing to China. That was a general uprising against communist everywhere. In their back, Hong Kong uprising and the courage that they have shown,

first of all, it's gotten a lot of tension. This very small group of people is standing up to that, standing up to China. That gets a lot of respect from people. Look how that virus spread over to Taiwan. Now, again, the Taiwanese people are courageous to begin with. Taiwanese people are very smart. They're just as smart as Hong Kongers. They're super intelligent people.

And they're also very courageous or they would not have stood up to China this long. But look at what happened on the January 11th elections. It was a landslide, 57% went for the DPP. And it was clearly a huge amount of wash came out of Hong Kong and washed right over Taiwan and said, look, we need to stand up. And Taiwanese stood even stronger than they have before. So what can the rest of the world do? if China starts to really clamp down on Hong Kong.

I mean, watching this on CNN and seeing people beat down by their own police force, it's tough. And we realize when we see that in certain countries that we can't do anything, but when we look at a country that has a history of democracy and trade and is doing well economically like Hong Kong, that's really tough to watch. Is there anything we can do as citizens that would make any bit of difference? One thing is to encourage our elected officials are, this case, the president, and of course our senators and representatives to clamp down politically and economically on China to support, for instance. The tariffs have been very helpful for us in many ways.

Of course, we're in a war with China. It's just a low-grade war. And we have to be willing to take some abuse to take out the CCP. We're going to live with China. Times are going to go on. Same with the Soviet Union and the Russians. We're going to live with the Russians, but we didn't have to live with the Soviet Union, right? We don't have to live with the CCP.

Anything that we can do to undermine the prestige, the economy. economy and the power, the military, economic, and political power and the prestige of CCP is something that should be on the table and we should be hitting on every day. In big ways and small, and we don't have to depend on the governments to do it. Anything that individuals can do, for instance, not buying products from China they don't have to get. But these days, it's very difficult for Americans. For instance, many of the products that we need to operate on are made in China, and there's no other choice. other than to get those from China. Many of the smartphones, for instance, are made in China.

Many of the computers are made in China. Robert Spalding, whom you've interviewed before, he mentioned in his book Stealth Wars that are propellant for our hellfire missiles. We are dependent on China for the propellant. I'm not sure of the details there. I remember this vaguely. I think it was an ingredient in part of the propellant. And then there were other things like optics, night vision.

There's some sort of rare earth metal that's required that we get from China, even though the rest of the item is made in the United States, and we can't really do anything without that rare earth metal. It won't work the same. So they can just simply clamp down on these very rare earth metals, these specific ingredients that we need, and we've effectively broken the chain because the weak link is this supply chain from China.

So we can stockpile it all we want, but in a protracted conflict, that won't matter. No, it won't. Those are not game-enders for us. They're just threats that we need to address. we've conjoined our economies such and China has attacked us in so many ways for so long that we can't just decouple suddenly. I mean, I would love to get out of the Apple ecosystem because I use Apple products. Even for an individual like me, it's not as simple as like I'll just replace all my stuff with non-apple.

I can do it. It just takes time. Now imagine that on a national scale and you got trillions of dollars flying around. That's just an example though, right? Apple's not something that you need to get rid of because dot, dot, dot, China. You're just using the example of being in an ecosystem when you refer to Apple, right? Both. I mean, they make a lot of their products in China. That's for sure.

It's funny how Apple sometimes has these tussles with FBI about releasing, making backdoors so the FBI can get into Apple products. Does anybody really think that Apple being made and sold in China, iPhones being sold in Apple products sold in China, do they really think that the CCC? doesn't have a backdoor, why would China be selling millions of iPhones, allow them to be sold within China without a back door so that people can have secure communications? It doesn't even make sense. We know how China operates. So in closing here, how long do you think this is going to last in Hong Kong? Do you see this wrapping up after a few months? Or do you think the next few years

are going to be punctuated with unrest in Hong Kong? Probably years, but we don't know. I mean, what's the Wuhan virus going to do? What effect? of all these other issues and Chinese Communist Party's problem set, how much are they going to factor in? How well is their economy going to do after this virus and the tariffs and the other things? Because if the Chinese Communist Party, if they can't maintain security and prosperity, which is the two things they promise, how much base are they going to have? What Hong Kong has to do is outlast the Chinese Communist Party. Michael Young, thank you very much. Anytime it's been a great, your questions are incredible. Anytime that you need me, just

Reach out. Big thank you to Michael Yon. His website will be linked in the show notes as well. Shortly after recording this, he was actually barred from entering Hong Kong. He is now in exile, so to speak. And that, to me, is a little bit crazy. I mean, you're obviously doing something right when you can't even go back to the place you were covering because you're making everybody a little bit edgy, getting everybody in a twist.

Thanks to Matthew Glennco for helping make this interview happen. Again, links to Michael's stuff will be in the show notes. Also in the show notes are worksheets for this episode so you can review what you've learned from Michael Yon. We also now have transcripts for each episode, including this one, and those can be found in the show notes as well. I'm teaching you how to connect with great people like Michael and manage relationships using systems and tiny habits over in our six-minute networking course, which is free over at Jordan Harbinger.com slash course. Don't do it later, do it now. Got to dig the well before you get thirsty. Once you need relationships, you are too late. These drills take just a few minutes a day. I wish I knew this stuff 20 years ago.

Find it all for free at Jordanharbinger.com slash course. And by the way, most of the guests on the show, they subscribe to the course and the newsletter. So come join us. You'll be in smart company. In fact, why not reach out to Michael Yon and tell him you enjoyed this episode of the show? Show guests love hearing from you,

and you never know what might shake out of that. Speaking of building relationships, you can always reach out and or follow me on social. I'm at Jordan Harbinger on both Twitter and Instagram. This show is created in association with podcast one. This episode was produced by Jen Harbinger and Jason DePhilippo, engineered by Jace Sanderson. Show notes and worksheets by Robert Fogarty, music by Evan Viola.

And I'm your host, Jordan Harbinger. Our advice and opinions and those of our guests are their own. And yes, I'm a lawyer, but I am not your lawyer. So do your own research before implementing anything you hear on the show. And remember, we rise by lifting others. The fee for this show is that you share it with friends when you find something useful or interesting. And I think for this episode,

anybody living or traveling in Asia, somebody who's interested in international or world events, will get a unique angle from this one. Hopefully you get something from every episode, and please share the show with those you love and even those you don't. In the meantime, do your best to apply what you hear on the show so you can live what you listen,

and we'll see you next time. This episode is sponsored in part by Something You Should Know podcast. Finding a new great podcast shouldn't be this hard, so let me save you some time. If you like the Jordan Harbinger show, you'll probably like Something You Should Know with Mike Carruthers. It's one of those shows that makes you smarter in a practical, useful way.

Same curiosity vibe we go for here, just in a fast-focused format. Mike brings on top experts and asks the exact questions that you'd want to ask, and the topics are all over the place in the best way. Recently, they've covered things like why we care so much what other people think, the benefits of laughter, why sports fans get so invested, and what makes people like you or not. The through line is always the same. Smart ideas you can actually use in real life.

Something you should know has been featured in Apple's shows we love, and it's got thousands of five-star reviews because it's consistently interesting. So if you want another show that scratches that I want to understand how people in the world really work, itch, search for something you should know wherever you get your podcasts.

Look for the bright yellow light bulb and start listening. You can thank me later.