The Jordan Harbinger Show - 721: Jason Feifer | Build for Tomorrow
Episode Date: September 6, 2022Jason Feifer (@heyfeifer) is the editor in chief of Entrepreneur magazine, host of the Build for Tomorrow podcast, and author of Build for Tomorrow: An Action Plan for Embracing Change, Adapt...ing Fast, and Future-Proofing Your Career. What We Discuss with Jason Feifer: How the bubonic plague that killed 60 percent of Medieval Europe forever changed the way we work, and the lessons from this tragedy we can apply to our own collective COVID experience. The pros and cons of the four-day work week that companies around the world are trying on for size. Why we should treat failure as valuable information that informs our next steps rather than accepting it as a death knell. What the erroneous but popularly repeated prediction that "nine out of ten businesses fail" leaves out of the equation. Why we should (and how we can) use the onset of major changes to the status quo as opportunities to address problems in need of solutions rather than taking the traditional approach of panicking as if society is collapsing all around us. And much more... Full show notes and resources can be found here: jordanharbinger.com/721 Sign up for Six-Minute Networking -- our free networking and relationship development mini course -- at jordanharbinger.com/course! Miss our conversation with world champion boxer and entrepreneur Laila Ali? Catch up with episode 309: Laila Ali | Finding Strength, Spirit, and Personal Power here! Like this show? Please leave us a review here -- even one sentence helps! Consider including your Twitter handle so we can thank you personally!See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.
Transcript
Discussion (0)
This episode is sponsored in part by Conspiruality Podcast.
You know how I'm always talking about critical thinking and spotting manipulation?
Well, there's a podcast that's all about dismantling new age cults, wellness grifters,
and conspiracy med yogis, basically the wild overlap of spirituality and misinformation.
It's called the Conspiruality Podcast.
The hosts, a journalist, cult researcher, and a philosophical skeptic,
dive deep into how this stuff spreads, from Project 2025 and the Heritage Foundation's
dystopian vision of the future to how former leftists get pulled in.
to far-right conspiracies.
An interesting episode to check out is called Speaking Truth to Goop, where Jen Gunter
breaks down the pseudoscience behind the wellness industry in a way that is super entertaining
and eye-opening.
It's sharp, funny, and makes you a lot harder to fool, which if you listen to this show,
you know I'm all about that.
From exploring cults to analyzing our cultural and political landscape, the Conspiruality
podcast will help you stay informed against misinformation and resist fear tactics.
Find Conspirality on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, and wherever you get your podcasts.
coming up next on the Jordan Harbinger Show.
I am fascinated by talking to people who make massive changes in their lives and business before they are forced to,
because they understand that by the time they're forced to do it, they're out of options.
Welcome to the show. I'm Jordan Harbinger.
On the Jordan Harbinger show, we decode the stories, secrets and skills are the world's most fascinating people.
We have in-depth conversations with scientists and entrepreneurs, spies and psychologists,
even the occasional former cult member, investigative journalist mafia enforcer, or gold smuggler,
and each episode turns our guest's wisdom into practical advice that you can use to build a deeper
understanding of how the world works and become a better thinker. If you're new to the show
or you want to tell your friends about the show, and I always appreciate it when you do that,
I suggest our episode starter packs as a place to begin. These are collections of our favorite
episodes organized by topics that will help new listeners get a taste of everything that we do here on the show.
topics like persuasion and influence, disinformation and cyber warfare, China and North Korea,
crime and cults, and more.
Just visit Jordan Harbinger.com slash start or search for us in your Spotify app to get started.
Today we're talking about future-proofing your career.
I'm really excited for this one.
My friend Jason Pfeiffer and I go way, way back.
The book starts with the premise that your life as it exists now will not exist in a few years.
And successful people and companies are good at withstanding change, not resisting
it but adapting to it. So this is a guide for people facing an uncertain future, which, by the way,
is all of us. Jason is the editor and chief of Entrepreneur Magazine, so he has seen a lot of businesses
and people in businesses survive, thrive, crash and burn. And then of course through interviewing him,
much like myself, he has a chance to dig in with those responsible for those results or lack
thereof. So he really comes at this from a pretty unique and knowledgeable angle, in my opinion.
Now, we tend to not look at technology as a slow-moving, constantly changing series of small events,
but we get distracted by what is the newest and the loudest.
Remember when people thought video games are ruining the youth?
And before that, it was radio or pinball or television, whatever.
Politicians love this because they can get clicks by playing to the moral panic.
People thought comic books were going to be bad for society, and it turned out, gee, when kids read a lot, they get better at reading.
So, if we panic and we react knee-jerk to change,
then we're not going to correctly identify the problem. And if we can't do that, we obviously can't
create solutions either. Again, this is a fun and wide-ranging conversation with a really smart
friend of mine that I know you're going to enjoy. So here we go with Jason Pfeiffer.
I love looking back at history and seeing how seemingly unconnected events actually had a massive
impact on one another or were causal in some way. And tell me about how the bubonic plague,
so the Black Death ends up changing the labor market of all things and how we are actually still
I guess you'd say feeling the effects of a plague that happened centuries ago.
I mean, feeling is one way to say it.
Benefitting from it is another.
I was fascinated to learn this, and I did at the very beginning of the pandemic because
it was like March or April 2020.
And I'm thinking to myself, we don't know what's coming, but did anything good come out
of the worst version of this that we can think of?
Because if so, then there's hope for whatever's coming next.
Yeah.
I call this guy, Andrew Rabin, medieval scholar at University of Louisville.
I love that guy.
I really suggest, maybe, Jordan, you have one of these.
I suggest having a favorite academic.
Like, somebody you can just call who's going to respond.
I got a weird question about something that happened 700 years ago.
You got some time?
And so I said to Andrew, what good came out of the bubonic plague?
And he said, actually, a whole bunch of really fascinating stuff did.
Then he told me this story.
So quick, for people who remember this from history class, the medieval economy was a lord
and surf system.
It means the lords own the land.
They also owned the serfs.
And the serfs worked the land for free.
talking about slavery. And the bubonic plague comes along, middle of the 1300s, and it kills
upwards of 60% of Europe. Upwards of 60% of Europe. Wow. Gone. Try to process that. It's impossible.
Right. I mean, it just means like 60% of people you know gone. That's crazy.
Rich, poor, didn't matter. You know, once the worst of it, or I don't even know how to describe
what the worst of it. Anyway, once something, the Lord say, you know, it's time to get back to work.
And so they go to the serfs and they say, get back to the land. You got to start making some
money. But here's the thing, something has changed. What has changed is that there are no longer
enough serfs for all the lords, because they all died, which means that you have lords who are
going to serfs, like multiple lords going to serfs and saying, hey, come to work for me. No,
no, no, no, no, I'll give you this, come work for me. And the serfs realizes something has changed.
What has changed is that they have leverage. And now they can start to demand compensation for their
work. Or they can say, you know what, screw it. I'm not interested in this anymore. And they can move to
the city and start the first merchant class. And this is the birth, really, in Europe of the employment
contract as we know it, the idea that labor has a value and that the people who do that work should be
compensated for that value. I mean, basically, Jordan, the thing, the reason why a lot of people are
listening to us right now is because they would like to figure out a way to make more money in their
own lives or something. Like, that comes out of this moment. Now, terrible things happen. We lost 60%
of Europe as a result, wouldn't want to say we want to lose 60% of our people.
I was going to say, I think we're on the same page here. We got to kill half the people on planet.
That'll be better for us. A little more than a half effect. So, right, but the thing is, like,
the reason why I love this story and why I put it early in the book is because I want us to
remember that we have, no matter what came before, right, no matter how hard a moment of change is,
we have an opportunity for what I like to call a wouldn't go back moment. 60% of Europe dying,
terrible. Nobody would opt for that. But it happened. There was no choice there. And so the best thing
that we can do is look at it and say, well, what good can we make of this? What can we get to where we say,
I have something new and valuable and I would not want to go back to a time before I had it.
That's our only option. Okay. So everybody's talked about remote work was always there.
Most didn't take advantage of it. Companies thought it was impossible. Now they know they not only is it
possible. I guess there's a different schools of thought here, but oh, my workers are happier and better.
or I can get leverage and acquire better talent if I offer remote work.
Now the commercial real estate market has to lower prices and that maybe even toast in certain cities.
I do wonder how we'll see this play out in the next 50 years or longer ago.
Do you have any guesses?
My guess is that what you will see play out is a combination of the best of what came before
and the beginnings of what we have now and where we're going.
People ask me about this a lot when we're trying to think about the future of work.
And there's really fascinating stuff going on right now.
Like the four-day work week is a really interesting experiment.
Is it France or the UK doing that?
One of the some European country is doing it.
Yeah, I think the UK is running an experiment right now.
Iceland ran a national experiment and it went so well that a lot of companies there have
transferred over.
And a lot of this goes back to me like the first time that a lot of people heard about
the four-day work week was Japan.
Microsoft Japan ran this study where they went down to four days of work a week and
productivity did not drop.
Now, just to be like really clear, we're not talking about four.
12-hour days of work, right? We're talking about four normal days of work, literally just eliminating
a day of work and productivity did not drop. How did that happen? Well, it's because you start to rethink
the way that you work, the pace that you work, you eliminate meetings that are completely unnecessary.
You find all these efficiencies. And as a result, people are happier and they're getting
the same amount done. And so a lot of companies now, as people have refought what they want from
their jobs, what they are willing to sacrifice for their careers. They start to say, you know,
I'm looking for a different balance here. And as a result, companies are starting to think,
well, how can we shift the way in which we are operating so that we can create an environment
where the best talent wants to be? So we shift to, and a bunch of companies are doing this. This is not
just experiment stuff. And it's not just in Iceland. There are plenty of companies in America that are
doing this. I'm surprised Japan was one of the countries to take this. I feel like they would be the last
people are like, you know what, we need to work less. And while we're at it, maybe we drink a little bit less, too,
and go to bed at a reasonable time. Right, because they have such a strong, like, work culture that
dominates their culture. But, you know, Japanese love efficiency. That's true. So this is super
interesting. I called a bunch of companies that have been running four-day work weeks to ask how it's been
going. And the most memorable thing that anybody said was this woman who runs, like, she's like the head
of people or whatever at a company called Buffer, tech company. They're about a year in now to the four-day
work week experiment. And she said, people are, they're really happy. They love it. She was talking to
somebody recently who said that they would have to make an extra $100,000 at another job to make them
go back to five days a week. Wow. That's a lot. That's a huge change. Huge change, right? Like,
if that's how you value that time, that says a lot. But here's so interesting. After about a year,
she started to hear some complaints. And the complaint was people started to feel disconnected from their
colleagues. Because, you know, when you shift to four days of work a week, you're eliminating all those
meetings, you're eliminating like hanging out in Slack. You know, you're eliminating all the kind of
downtime that seemed like it was pointless, but actually was creating bonding and culture. And so
when you eliminate that, after a while, you start to feel disconnected from your colleagues. So now,
the people at Buffer are not saying, oh my God, this is a terrible disaster. And we have to go back to
five a week because that's not the right answer, right? I mean, I think that whenever we face a problem,
a question of trying to manage change, the thing that we should not ask is, is this perfect?
Because that's a useless question.
Nothing's ever perfect.
Instead, the better question is, are our new problems better than our old problems?
And in this case, the answer is yes, because people are happy.
Retention is very strong because people love the support that they're getting, but they have
this problem.
This problem is that they're feeling disconnected.
So now they've got to solve that.
And so they're experimenting with all these different ways.
Can they build in these little micro-bonding moments throughout the day or whatever?
And anyway, the reason why I tell you that is because I don't think that the future of work looks like what we had before the pandemic, but I don't think it also looks like whatever our current experiments are.
Because our current experiments are really only going to drive us to learning more like Buffer is learning right now.
So what will come in the future will be an integration of the best of the old, the best of the new, and best of what's coming next.
Interesting. I like that. That was a little bit of an aside, but I was curious to your thoughts there because I know this is something that you're always kind of, you're always waiting in those waters for entrepreneurship.
and for your own show. So the big takeaway here is that crisis is opportunity. Force change can produce
good things, but we should maybe want to make those changes on our own terms. So instead of waiting
for a massive pandemic to slay millions of us that changes the labor market, maybe we make the move
beforehand. I want to just account that our team has been working remote for like 15 years before
because we were too cheap to buy office space. That seems less like seeing the future and more like a
broken clock is still right two times a day. Well, I think that what you'll find is that there are
even more innovations and efficiencies, things that you can find now that new tools are available
for, you know, communication, for operating work remotely. I mean, the thing is that teams that were doing
this before the pandemic, we're doing it with what we now would consider to be pretty archaic
tools. I mean, even just in the last few years, it's been amazing, remarkable to see how many people,
how many entrepreneurs looked around and said, you know what, there are new needs. And instead of
very concerned about holding on to how to serve old needs. I'm going to start developing things
based on what people want right now. That's where innovation comes from. And that's what the most
adaptable people do. Another concept I really like to apply to my own life is that failures often
look like wins, but you have to zoom out far enough on the timeline. For example, and you wrote
about this in the book, Netflix tried to sell itself to Blockbuster for, was it $50 million,
which is hilarious because that's like a week of revenue or something at Netflix now.
maybe not even that. Right. Now it's worth $200 plus billion, or at least as of publishing of the book,
who knows, the market's crazy right now. Yeah, that may have been outdated by now. Yeah, like,
don't check your Netflix stock. Take my word for it for the sake of this conversation. But it
probably seemed like such an epic failure at the time. You know, like, oh, Blockbuster, that was our big
exit. What are we going to do now? I've got a warehouse full of DVDs and these little red envelopes.
I'm such a loser. I would imagine the conversations kind of went like that, either to
themselves or to their significant others? The wonderful thing about that story is that Reed Hastings
at the time in which he was trying to sell Blockbuster could have very easily gone home and said,
I have failed. I have failed at building a company that I can sell and now it's just downhill from here.
Instead, what he did was he clearly looked at this as an individual moment in time, just one,
one of what was going to be many. And when you are willing to and able to zoom out, and I know it's
hard. Believe me, I have many times, an almost daily basis where something happens and it doesn't go
my way and I feel like, damn it, that is the end of it all. But if we are willing to say, you know,
everything that happens is simply a point on a continuum, well, then we can learn something from that
point. We can say, you know, this moment that feels like failure is actually data. We can think
of failure is data and it starts to inform the next thing that we do. Have you heard this stat,
which I really hate, which is that nine out of ten businesses fail.
Within four years, right? Is that the thing? Nine out of ten businesses fail within four
years or most small businesses fail within four years. And that's so discouraging if you're
thinking about starting a small business, especially if it's your first time doing it because you're
like, geez, I'm not special enough to be one of the minority that makes it. Why would I be that?
Right. That's right. It makes it seem like trying something new is not even worth it.
Because if nine out of ten businesses fail, and look, this is like you don't have to be.
have to be thinking about starting a business in order to feel this because if nine out of ten
businesses fail, then that feels like why on earth would I even try? Why would I try something new?
But the thing is that that statistic just isn't even close to true. If you look at the data,
what you find is that about half of businesses, I think, survive something like the first five years.
I wish I had the data right in front of me, but I don't remember it exactly. But anyway,
when you look at, and the government research has done this, when you look at what
actually happened to those businesses that closed, what you find is that a good bulk of them
did not close because of some catastrophic failure. They closed because of some natural conclusion,
either because the business had succeeded in doing whatever it was going to do or the person
decided to retire or they sold it or whatever. There was some natural reason in which it ended.
And the other ones, even if they did close because of what we might call a failure, what we don't
see in that data is that the failure may have informed the next thing that they did and that was the
success. It's not reasonable to say that just because something didn't work, that the person who did it
is a failure and will always be a failure. Because when I talk to, and Jordan, you do too, when we talk to
people who have had massive successes, they have done that on top of a pile of failures. Yeah,
Slack comes to mind. Wasn't it like a video game company that no one cared about basically for years,
like a decade? There's like endless varieties of this in which the company that you know,
actually came out of some company that completely failed.
And that's wonderful.
Can I tell you a quick story?
It's like one of my most memorable encounters with an entrepreneur.
All right.
So before kids,
I liked to listen to podcasts in the shower.
I don't do that so much anymore.
What does that have to do with kids?
I know there's a tangent, but why?
Well, because one,
the kids will often burst in
and then they'll need something
and then I won't be able to focus.
Two, because I don't have as much time to shower as I used to.
Like my showers are extremely fast right now.
I can't make it through a Jordan Harbinger episode.
I mean, I wasn't taking hour-long podcasts before.
How dare you.
That's an incredible amount of showering.
But, yeah, you know, I usually would try to take a nice leisurely 10-minute shower.
Now I'm in, like, it's like four minutes, right?
Like, how fast can we get in and out of this thing?
And then I got somebody screaming.
Yeah.
And then I got to get somebody breakfast.
Anyway, I was looking for a speaker.
I wanted to do two things.
I have three things.
I wanted it to be waterproof.
I wanted it to be Bluetooth.
I wanted to be wireless because I wanted to be able to just kind of beam the show into a speaker in the
shower and not have the speaker break.
Without running an extension cord into the place where you're bathing.
I'd like to survive my showers.
And anyway, I went on to Amazon and I couldn't find anything from any brand that you've
ever heard of that had these three things.
There was only one speaker on Amazon that did this.
And it was a brand called hype.
What the hell is hype?
You ever heard of hype?
No, nobody's ever heard of hype.
And I look at the reviews and people say, I've never heard of this company before,
but the speaker worked as advertised. And if I had any questions, there was an email address that came
on a piece of paper and I emailed it and a guy named Sam responded. And I was like, well,
I've spent $70 on more questionable things. So I bought it. And the speaker shows up and it works as
advertised. I had some question. I can't remember. Some connectivity issue. So I emailed the email address.
And sure enough, like a day later, this guy, Sam responds. And Sam says to me, he's like, thanks for
writing, here's what China said, and then like a block of kind of broken English text that once I
spent some time with it did answer my question. But now I'm thinking, okay, what is hype?
Who is Sam? What is this? What did China say? What is he talking about? Yeah, he's a reseller or something,
right? Seemed maybe? I don't know, but I got very curious. So I started badgering Sam.
I'm really, really good at badgering people. And I said, Sam, I got to know what's going on.
What is this company? Who are you? And then I started Googling around. I found that hype was connected
to a company called CNA marketing in New Jersey.
I email Sam, I say, how is hype connected to CA marketing?
He sends me back a smiley face.
And now, like, I got to know.
And so I'm sending this guy with multiple emails.
Finally, he makes a time to talk.
And then he takes it back.
He puts me in touch with a publicist,
who puts me in touch with a marketing person
who tells me that what I need to do is,
in like, a week or two,
show up at this photography industry convention
at the Javitt Center in Manhattan.
I live in New York.
Go to the Polaroid stand and ask for Chaim.
That's where I took a bar exam.
So I'm familiar with this, like, crazy, like old...
event area, event space.
To the least welcoming space in New York, and that's really saying something.
So, you know, you got to do that, right?
So I showed up at the convention hall and I go to the polarite stand.
Then I ask for Chaim.
Which Heim?
There's 800 Heim.
This is Manhattan.
That's a good point.
Fortunately, I find Mycheim.
Yeah.
My Chaim is this guy with a, you know, wispy red beard.
And he sits down and he's like talking in riddles.
And, you know, he's like, every time that my wife or daughter come home with a product,
I say, you shouldn't have bought that because I make that.
And it's like, what are you talking about?
Yeah.
And I could not, I just could not understand what he was doing.
So finally I say, can I just come to your wherever you work and see what's going on here?
And he says, okay, so like a week or two later, I go out to New Jersey and I meet Chaim and I understand finally what's going on.
So Chaim at the time was running CNA marketing.
This is the whole reason I'm telling you the story is because this is about learning from failure.
So Chaim started in the camera film industry, like, you know, making camera film.
And he saw that eventually there was going to be an end to that industry.
so he got into digital cameras.
And then he saw, you know, this is kind of a difficult industry.
He got into camera accessories.
And then he saw, well, this is a difficult industry.
And he's trying to figure out what to do.
How do I pivot?
How do I make this work?
I'm like in a bunch of failing industries right now.
And then he has his realization.
His realization comes because of all his failures,
which is that he has been making these products and selling them on Amazon.
And he realizes that Amazon isn't just a great place to sell products.
Amazon is a free, massive R&D facility.
You can put something on Amazon
and instantly see how people react to it.
And even better, you can go to other companies' products
and go into their comments
and see what people like and they don't like.
Which means that you can go to, for example,
a speaker product made by Bose
and look down and see people saying,
you know, I really like this thing,
but I wish that it was waterproof.
Right, okay.
And then Svahim would say,
oh, well, why don't we just make a version of that
waterproof, it will put it on, and then we'll see what happens. So he assembles this team. He walks
me into this room. Chaim is an Orthodox Jew and he... He's don't say. Yeah. Because I wasn't clear.
Right. I walk into this room. It is just full of these Orthodox Jewish guys. He's like hired his
network. He said at the time, he said he has one Italian guy. He lets him work from home.
That sounds a little bit like they just don't want him there, but okay, fine. I'm sure. I'm sure. This was pre-pantemic. I'm sure the
I was like, he felt very excited that he had a rare work from home job. Anyway, so these guys are all
working from home, and they all have these different areas that they focused on. And so Sam was
working in the speakers in whatever department. And so Sam's job is to identify these products,
find a way in which somebody might want some upgraded or slightly different version of it,
go to China, have somebody make it, slap some random brand on it called hype, and then put it
on Amazon and see what happens. If people like it, they make more of it. And if they don't,
then they kill it. And this is now how he's built this business. And it is a massive, massive
business. I can't remember the size of it, but it was growing at like 30% a year when I talked.
And now, years later, it is.
is called CNA Global.
He's got offices around the world.
He bought Ritz camera.
He bought Skymall.
Remember that thing?
And you sit down in an airplane?
Yeah.
That's where you buy like inflatable hot tubs from your airplane.
That's exactly right.
Yeah.
Yeah.
Chaim owns that now.
Wow.
All off of learning from these failures.
And so the reason I love this story is because it should inform you that, look, any
single time in which you're doing something and it does not work out, you could look at
it as this was a terrible failure or you could look at it as I have an advantage that
other people don't.
because I got to the front lines of where this challenge is,
and therefore I see this challenge in a way that other people don't,
and I can build what I learn into whatever I do next,
and that gives me an advantage over other people.
You're listening to The Jordan Harbinger Show with our guest, Jason Pfeiffer.
We'll be right back.
If you're wondering how I managed to book all these amazing folks for the show,
like I said, I'm friends with Jason.
We go way back.
He put me in the New York Times.
Can't complain about that.
I've got a great network,
and I'm teaching you how to build your network for free.
It's one of the most important things I've ever done for my business and my personal life for that matter.
I've met my wife that way, most of us have.
The course is free.
It's at Jordan Harbinger.com slash course.
This course will make you a better networker, a better connector, and more importantly, a better thinker.
Again, it's free at Jordan Harbinger.com slash course.
And most of the guests you hear on the show, subscribe and contribute to that course.
So come join us.
You'll be in smart company where you belong.
Now, back to Jason Pfeiffer.
I wish I knew this zoom out, used for,
failure as data in this same way. I mean, I'd heard that kind of thing before, but it's like in the
moment, you're like, whatever, this still sucks. This is kind of what it was like for me transitioning
from my old business, my old podcast to my new show. It felt like such an epic kick in the nuts.
But once a few years had gone by, I realized that all the cliches that people had thrown at me
in many ways were true, it was the best thing that ever happened to me in terms of my business
because all the previous knowledge that I had. And I know we'll get to that in a little bit,
but all the skills that I had, all of these relationships that I had actually made a lot more
sense. But instead of slowly pivoting, which is what I thought I wanted to do, it was actually better
to just rip the cord out of the wall and throw the machine out the window and rebuild it because
it was such a mess that a new iteration was better from the ground up. It's like you don't remodel
a skyscraper that's before World War II to go back to your Manhattan analogy. You don't
rebuild that thing and then slap an elevator on it. You just demolish it and build a new one. It's got
different materials, the elevators are in the middle, you can put central air in the thing,
you don't have window units everywhere, that's what I needed to do with my business. But you kind of
don't know to do that if you don't know about these concepts and about zooming out and about
realizing that everything that you've done before is going to play a part and what you do in the
future, because sometimes you can't really see that. With big changes, you wrote that we go in
stages. Stage one is usually panic. Tell me about margarine.
I didn't expect that turn on the question.
Yeah.
Keeping out your toes.
I appreciate it.
So, okay, yes, you're right.
So there are four stages to panic.
Well, I assume to talk about it, but the first one is panic, which is what everybody feels, right?
As soon as change happens, you feel absolute panic.
And the reason you feel panic is pretty reasonable.
It's because you feel like the thing that you knew is gone.
And then you start to extrapolate because we want to know what's coming next.
So we say, well, if I lost this thing, I experienced change.
change is loss. Loss is so much easier to see than game. If I experience change and loss,
now I know what I've lost. And because I lost this thing, I'm going to lose that thing.
Because I lost that thing, I'm not going to be as relevant anymore. And now I've got myself a kind
of spiraling problem. So this brings us to what you shouldn't do at that moment, which is
margarine. So thanks for bringing that up. Okay, here's a fun fact about margarine. So the original
margarine is not what you know of as margarine. The original margin was like a kind of, it was
beef tallow. It was like a kind of weird concoction that came from beef and it spread like butter.
And it came out of this challenge that the French Emperor Napoleon III in the mid-1800s had made.
What he wanted was a butter-like substance that could travel easily with his soldiers.
And in 1869, this chemist in France came up with this thing that he called oleo margarine.
And it did exactly that. It was basically like a cheap, transportable source of protein for soldiers, which was really helpful.
and then it made its way across the Atlantic. At the time, you know, most people, you know,
this is the mid-late 1800s, you know, most people in America, they couldn't afford much
nutrition. I mean, they were living on stale bread. And anything with protein was very expensive.
And that included butter, because butter, one, it was really expensive, but two, you couldn't store it
anywhere. So no refrigerators, right? No refrigerators, right? So this is a pre-refergrigeration era.
So margarine comes along, and it is cheap, and it's, you can.
stores easily. It is access to many people who cannot afford butter. It is access to some nutrients,
you know, some fat and some protein that they can put on their stale bread. It's very, very useful.
And so margarine takes off. And this puts the butter industry in just absolute panic.
Right? They have, I found all these really funny newspaper articles. This one in 1874, it was like
some declaration from the butter industry saying that every measure must be taken to ensure,
quote, supremacy of the dairy in our agriculture. And they start working with local lawmakers to
pass these insane laws that limit how people can access margarine. So first, they tax the ever-leaving
hell out of margarine. There's a congressional act in 1886 that does this. But then the big one,
states start passing these laws mandating that margarine be dyed unappealing colors, like pink margarine
or black margarine. Yeah, that is gross. That is gross. Who's going to buy that?
And the whole reason for this was just to make it seem unappealing because what butter wants to do here is compete unfairly.
It's to compete unfairly, right?
Right, which you can find.
It's a tradition that is alive and well today.
Exactly.
Just look to the halls of Congress.
So what I think is important.
The reason why I like the story is because it shows you how the butter industry in panicking did not even attempt to try to think about how to solve problems for people.
They did not think about how this change could ultimately drive them to improve.
their product and the way in which they serve people and therefore expand the reach of their product.
Instead, what they tried to do is they just tried to stop the change entirely. And that never
works out for you. So what happened as a result? Well, this crazy pink margarine thing ended up in the
Supreme Court. And the Supreme Court said that you cannot force margarine to be dyed crazy colors.
But what it did leave open was that margarine could be stopped from being dyed yellow. So
margarine couldn't sell itself yellow to compete with butter. So margarine companies started selling
their margarine pure white and then they sold a little yellow capsule along with it, which people
could mix into the margarine and then it would look like butter. And it turns out kids really,
really loved that. So they started stirring the yellow into the margarine. And then a whole generation
of people thought that butter was this thing that shows up white that you pour yellow into. And
for like 50-something years, margarine sales actually outpaste.
butter sales and butter really, really struggled.
Like, oh, I want the kind that you mix yourself.
I don't want the kind that's already yellow.
Buy the other one.
Right. Meanwhile, you're choosing margarine over butter.
Exactly.
And then butter became the subject, these health scares.
And anyway, the whole point of it is like, if you look back on this now, you could
have said, well, what could butter have done differently?
Well, they could have used failure as data here.
They could have seen, well, butter sales are going down and margin sales are going
up.
Why?
Because margarine is serving a need that we are not serving.
So how could we do that better?
Is there a way in which we can either reduce our manufacturing costs?
Can we get in on the development of refrigeration?
Because, boy, that would have been amazing.
That was happening right around the same time.
Big Margarine could have easily gotten in bed with big refrigeration.
There were all sorts of things that they could do, and they didn't.
And instead, what they did is they panicked and they made a stupid decision because when you panic, that's what you do, you make stupid decisions.
And as a result, they harmed themselves for about 50 years.
Big dairy is trying to do the same thing with almond milk, oat milk, alternative milk.
Like, you can't use the word milk.
And so that's going to end up with, I would imagine, predictable backfires.
somehow. I don't know how, but somehow it's going to blow up in their face. It absolutely will. It's
crazy how the same exact story is playing out right now. And instead of thinking, how can I be more
innovative? How can I learn from the reason why people are leaving me? Instead, they just try to
stop people from leaving them. It doesn't work that way. We saw that with Spotify, Napster and
music. I see it now. I've got little kids. We talk about this all the time, panic about kids and
screens. And I also was slash I'm worried about that. But then when I read your book, and it's like,
well, yeah, they did that with the radio.
And it's like they were worried about kids listening to the radio.
How quaint that sounds these days.
Forget about the internet with access to 24-7, like hardcore pornography that we have now.
Wow, the kids might listen to music a lot.
And of course, original radio, it's all live musicians playing in studio.
So don't let your kids near that string quartet.
Everyone knows after the violin concerto.
The next step is intravenous heroin.
Like, what a weird thing to worry about.
My kid does become a friggin zombie when he's watching something on the iPad, but the idea that
the radio would corrupt children or that, and I remember Ryan Holiday saying something like
the Stoics or at least early philosophers, maybe in Greece, were worried that reading was going to
cause people to not be able to memorize everything anymore. So books are a terrible idea.
Now it's like nobody alive is saying books are bad for you, not one person.
That's right. So that is a controversial reading of, I think, Aristotle.
The point he was making was the difference between feeling like you know something for sure
and that you just have a kind of thin understanding of it because you read it.
I don't know, whatever.
I'm not a Greek historian, but I'm probably right about that, but I don't think he's like,
by the way, so what I mean is no more books.
No, right.
It was more like understand what you're reading, I think was his point, right?
There was in the late 1800s, mid to late 1800s, actually a whole thing about how books were
terrible. Novels were considered to be a terrible influence on particularly women and children.
And there was like Thomas Jefferson in a letter in 1818. He wrote that books are poison that
infects the mind. There were all these concerns that people were going to be addicted to reading.
They were addicted to radio. There was a national moral crisis over teddy bears in 1907.
There are all these things where new things come out and people start engaging with them.
and it changes the way in which we appear to be behaving.
And therefore, we read it as some kind of foundational, very dangerous change to our lives.
And it's just never proven to be the case.
There are like two stories that I want to tell you.
I'll see if I can remember to do both.
One is on this point about witnessing change in the way in which new technology can alter us,
this is this woman named Sherry Turkle.
Yeah.
Yeah.
So Sherry Turkle writes books about how technology.
is going to inhibit our ability to have meaningful conversations with people, and it's tearing
us apart. And I'm not a big fan of her work. Just be frank. A while ago, years and years ago,
she wrote this piece of the New York Times that drove me insane in which she was explaining how
having these phones in your pockets lead you to live what she called the documented life in which
you're no longer experiencing life. Instead, rather, what you're doing is you're simply going around
documenting that life, which is, I guess, an interesting observation, but I don't think is very
true once you start to think about why people are doing things. So anyway, she describes walking around
L.A. with Aziz Ansari, the comedian. Oh, yeah. She writes that as she's doing this, people start coming up
to Aziz, they start demanding photographs with him. Very important. She uses the word demand in there.
She says they don't ask for an autograph. They demand a photo. So she's, you know, there's a value
judgment there. And Aziz, instead of just taking a photo with them, tries to engage them in
conversation. He asks them about their tastes in music or what they like about his performances or
his sitcoms or whatever. And she describes his fans as being, you know, mollified but not happy. And
they walk away seeming a little unsatisfied. And to her, this is evidence of a plague, a change
driven, technology-driven plague in which because people want the photo and because they are so
used to now just documenting things. They don't seem to have the ability to have a human-to-human
interaction. But I really challenge that. And the reason I do is because I think that Sherry and
Aziz have not thought through what the interaction with Aziz was for from the perspective of somebody
who has come up to him. The person who has come up to Aziz. Well, first of all, they don't think
that Aziz wants to spend a lot of time talking to them. And so if he does, they're going to be
probably nervous that what they're going to say is not going to feel interesting to
a Z's. And also, it's pretty weird when a celebrity is like, oh, thanks for liking my work.
Tell me very specifically what you like about my work. That's uncomfortable. I wouldn't know
how to answer that question. I do that when people write to me and often they're like, oh,
well, now that you're asking, or some people are like, if it happens in real time, it's funny
because some people are like, the latest one about this was great, but there's so many favorites
and other people who are just lying to you because they want that selfie. They're like,
oh, all of them are great.
Or they're like, oh, man, the one you did with Kobe Bryant four years ago.
Oh, it was so good.
And it's like, you literally only know that one thing that you saw on a home page or something.
Come on.
My God, I'm so glad I'm not a Jordan Harbinger fan coming up to you asking for a selfie.
No, I love that.
I just don't like when people lie about something.
And they're like, I want to pitch a guest to you.
I'm a huge fan of your show.
And I'm like, what's your favorite episode?
The latest one.
That's what lazy people are right?
The latest one.
I'm like, you didn't even try it.
Well, when people are pitching, I mean, this, you know,
the editor-in-chief of a magazine, I know very, very well that when people are pitching me and
they say they love my work at the very beginning, 99% at the time, that is definitely not true.
They don't know my work at all. They just want me to write about them. Anyway, here's the thing about
this thing with the Z's. I think that Sherry has misunderstood the situation here. People who are
coming up to him are very interested in personal connection. They're just not interested in a
personal connection with Aziz. They have a transactional relationship with disease. He makes something,
and they consume it. And they're very happy with that relationship. And they don't know what else to do
with that relationship. So when they go and they see him, what they don't want is an hour-long conversation.
What they do want is a photo of themselves with a Z so that they can share with their friends
who they do have actual relationships with. There's value to that. Don't devalue that.
This is the thing that I think we really need to keep in mind whenever we see changes that are
driven by new technologies or really anything else. Can people have bad experiences? Yes, of course.
Can people overdo it? Can they be on social media too much and to the detriment of other things in life?
yes, of course, on an individual basis, absolutely. But let's not say that just because
something looks different, it is different. Let's not say that just because it appears as if somebody
is doing something that I find unfamiliar, therefore that person must be broken in some way,
that some fundamental part of their humanness must not exist anymore. That just doesn't track
because we have gone through history where, like you said, people have been concerned about
the radio being too addictive and novels being too addictive and teddy bears destroying girls.
And over and over and over again, there's endless examples of the...
Potatoes, right? Wasn't potatoes one of the examples? Which makes no sense to me at all.
Yes, there's actually quite a lot of foods that people were extremely concerned about.
Some of them actually, there's, like, good reason for that because tomatoes, for example,
like you go back and I think people call them the devil's apple, but there was good reason for that
because the tomato that we know has been cultivated over hundreds of years. Like back then,
it was like small and bitter and not, you know, it was like a totally different fruit.
But yes, like there are endless, endless versions of the car. People called it the devil wagon.
People like to throw a devil around a lot.
I read it in your book that people would see a car.
driving down the street and throw rocks at it and be like, get a horse, which is hilarious,
because it sounds fake.
They would literally yell get a horse at people when they drove down the street.
Yes, it's hilarious, right?
And there's good reason for that.
And actually, a good lesson that comes out of that story, which we're going to tell you.
But like, let's not forget that our fundamental humanness can take different expressions
in different generations, depending on what happens to be available to us.
I talked to this guy, Lee Rainey.
He's the head of the Pew Center for Internet Research or something.
I'm sure I have that a little bit wrong.
But anyway, he made this really interesting point to me, which was.
was, he said, look, in the past, a sign of intelligence was the ability to quickly retain
and recall information. Today, a sign of intelligence is the ability to quickly find and process
information. Is one better and one worse? No, they're just different. And that's okay. It's okay
for things to be different because we are adapting to our environments and to our new needs and not
everything is always going to look the same. It reminds me of when my teachers used to
say, you have to memorize this because you're not going to walk around with a calculator in your
pocket. And I thought to myself, probably I won't need to walk around with a calculator in my pocket
because I'm going to have one of these computers doing whatever I'm doing in my job because I love
computers and I'm 13. Now, well, jokes on you, Mrs. Orava, because every human that you know
walks around with a calculator in their pocket and a video thing and email and everything else for
better for worse in their pocket. And if you don't memorize your multiplication tables,
it pretty much doesn't matter. And oh, you need to know how to
write things quickly by hand because, nope, the last time I wrote something by hand was probably
like on a piece of wood that I was about to cut or something like that. I can't even remember the last
time I wrote something by hand that was longer than two words. And that's fine because the thing is,
you have tools that can do that so you can learn other skills. Right. It's not like you lost
something that we all needed. You lost something that people needed at a particular time. And instead,
you are devoting your brain space to developing other skills that are useful in your
time and that's a good thing. I got to tell you, man, I earned the ire of many of my mother's
friends on Facebook. This is a few years ago. Sorry, Mom. Somebody had posted something like,
kids can't even write in cursive anymore. It's ridiculous and they do this and that and they
have to print and it's like, it's so pathetic I used to beat. And my mom would likeed it or
shared it. And I went in the comments, of course, like a total a whole son would do. And I go,
how many of you can type faster than 100 words per minute? Every kid you're complaining about,
can do at least that. Every kid that you're whining about who can't write in cursive. Now,
how often do you write in cursive at work versus how often do you use the computer?
Y'all are sitting there using two fingers to type and the kids are done with the first page
by the time you're done with the first paragraph or even the first couple of sentences. What's more
useful? And it was just like melt down, whose kid is this? Shut your mouth, you little twirp
kind of replies. And I just thought, like, this is what we're looking at in real time, is this
failure to adapt, which is understandable. I'm going to be that way too. But to not see it and then
complain about it is somehow just absolutely peak boomer in many ways. Or a peak old person in any
generation, I guess you'd say. It's peak every generation. So let me tell you, we were talking about
music earlier. Let me tell you like the other music story that I want to tell you because I think
it leads to some good advice for anybody who feels stuck in this kind of thing. It's fun to rag on
these folks, but like it's also important to realize that we will become these folks. And so let's
arm ourselves with some. Let's be aware of it and not and go, oh, I'm the old one and they're
doing the right thing and maybe I see where the puck is going and then I'm the person who's
70, you can actually type. Yeah, right. So, turn of the century, the phonograph,
brand new innovation, the very first record player, consider how completely insanely
revolutionary this was. For all of human history, before the phonograph, if you wanted to
listen to music, there was only one way to do it. And that was to be in front of a human being
who was playing an instrument. It's another way. How are you going to listen to music?
then this machine comes along and can do it for you, can play music, unbelievable. Consumers didn't
believe it at first. Like, they literally had to be shown. Like, no, there's not a person behind the
wall playing music. Like, they had to be shown. And then once they believed it, they loved it,
they brought it home. You know who hated this? Yeah, I don't know, musicians. Yeah,
musicians hated it. Hated it because they saw themselves being replaced. Here they, you know,
they see this new technology doing the thing that they do, and they see change, and they equate change with
loss and they say, we got to stop this, right? They pull a margarine. And the leader of the
resistance was this guy named John Philip Sousa. John Philip Sousa, you may not know his name,
but you know his music because it's still around today. All the military marches.
Da, da, da, da, da, da, da, da, that dot, da, that dot, dot, that John Phillipsson. You know why we know who he is?
Because we have recordings of the music. Bingo! That's exactly right. So John Phillips
Susan, he at the time was the leader of the resistance against recorded music. He wrote this
amazing piece. Like, Google it because it is hilarious. It's called The Menace of Mechanical
Music. It ran in Appleton's Magazine in 1906. And it contains all of these wonderful arguments
against recorded music. And my favorite goes like this. He says, when you bring recorded
music into the home, it will be the end of all forms of live performance in the home. Because
why would anybody perform music in the home when now there's a machine that can do it for them?
So now, because we're going to extrapolate loss, remember I talked about that earlier, right?
Like, you see change as loss, then you extrapolate the loss.
So what's next?
Well, he says, because people are no longer performing music at home, mothers will no longer
sing to their children.
Quite the jump.
Yeah, quite the jump.
Why would they do that when a machine could do it?
Here's another jump.
Because children grow up imitating their mothers, the children will grow up to imitate
the machines, and thus we will raise a generation of machine babies.
That was his argument.
Like a real thing that people took seriously.
I feel like it's fun to like laugh at John Phillips-Souza for this, but also I feel like what he's doing is pretty relatable.
It is relatable.
It's very human.
It's very human.
You have something and it works for you.
And then you see some change come along and you feel like this change is existential.
It is going to outmode you.
So he tried to stop it.
And it's worth asking ourselves in this moment.
Three simple questions.
Number one, what is this new thing that's happening?
number two, what new habit or skill are we learning as a result? And then number three, how can that be put to good use? Because if you do that, it just helps you reframe any moment of change as let's focus on the game. Is there some kind of gain that we can extrapolate? Maybe it's not as easy to see as the loss, but is it there and what would it look like? Because if you ran that scenario with John Phillips-Souza, what you would see is, well, okay, what new thing are people doing? Well, what they're doing is they're now listening to music on these.
machines whenever they want. What new habit or skill are we learning as a result? We're learning that we
have control or consumers have a lot more control over the music that they listen to and therefore
also have access to a lot more music because before the only music that they could get was
whoever happened to be able to travel to their town and perform for them. How could that be put to
good use? Well, come on, guys. Come on, John Phillips, Susan. This means that you could record something
yourself and you could sell it and now people can listen to and enjoy your music and you can
monetize that in ways that are much more scalable than what you're doing now because you're coming
from a world in which the only thing that you do is perform for people that you can get in front
of and that means that you have a limited number of people that you can get in front of but if you
can change that dynamic then man oh man suddenly your economic ability skyrockets as it turns out
john philip susa was protecting a system that limited his own economic ability and the
he was doing that was because he was panicking because of change. And once he figured it out,
he changed his tune. That is not meant to be a pun, but there it is. I see what you did there.
You are a dad indeed. There it is. I'm nailing it. I got all the dad jokes. And he started to
record himself and he started to perform on radio and he changed. And this is something we all need
to be mindful of. There is gain in change and we need to run ourselves through these things that
can just help us focus on it. This is the Jordan Harbinger show with our guest Jason Pfeiffer.
We'll be right back.
Thank you so much for listening to and supporting this show.
Our advertisers, I know those codes and those URLs are always changing.
They can be complicated.
You might even be bench pressing running right now, driving.
Don't write anything down.
Just go to Jordan Harbinger.com slash deals.
That's our deals page.
You can search for any deal there, any code there.
It'll always pop up.
You can also search for any sponsor of the show using the search box on our website as well at
Jordan Harbinger.com.
So please consider supporting those who support this show.
Now for the rest of my conversation with Jason Pfeiffer.
You're not really just cherry picking the examples here.
Movie theaters were like VHS is going to ruin everything.
Meanwhile, people just wanted to own huge collections of movies,
and those are movie buffs,
and they would still go see a re-release of a movie that they owned in a theater
because it meant so much to them.
It's not like they hadn't seen it since it was last in theaters.
They probably watched it 100 times on their VCR.
So instead it becomes a new revenue source for the studios,
streaming music and movies, Metallica,
and everybody was panicking.
oh God, they're stealing from us.
And then bands that you'd never heard of became super popular and famous.
And existing bands that were already super popular and famous started to sell way more stuff,
have way more huge audiences.
Their shows started to sell out no matter what all the time.
And it made both industries better all the time.
And it just seems obvious, but I know we all do this, right?
If something happened to podcasting and they're like, you've got to do this in the Metaverse.
I'll be like, this is going to ruin podcasting instead of being like, well, now I can do all this
metaverse stuff with my podcast.
I would initially probably panic and look, well, hopefully I'd be smart enough to look and see what
other people are doing with it. But I think my initial thought would be, uh-oh, this is the beginning
of the end. Because the future is coming for us, right? It's not optional. You got to get there first.
You got to adapt. You got to thrive. But first, maybe you kind of, your instinct is to go,
oh, crap. Yeah. It sucks. And so one of the things that you can do during those times is that you can
really focus in on what is the thing about you that does not change. When I was hearing, you go
through that example with the better verse thing. I can see why you would panic about that,
right? Because you have built a great business in a particular medium with a particular consumption
habit. People are listening to you in a very specific way. When and if that changes, that's going to
feel really, really scary. And so what you're going to need to do, and maybe you do some version
of this already, but what you're going to need to do is start to separate for yourself the difference
between what you do, what is the output of your work, and what is the core thing about,
you that has value, right? So some people just call it your why. The difference between your what and
your why. Because I think we all identify far too closely with the thing that we produce, with the way in
which we work. When I was just starting out, I started out as a newspaper reporter. And I'll tell you,
man, I identified as a newspaper reporter. Like people would, they come up to me at a party and they would say,
you know, what do you do? And I'd say, I'm a newspaper reporter. It was my identity. And then like a year or two in,
when I discovered that working in newspapers can suck.
Very unstable industry.
Hours are terrible.
And I didn't really want to be in newspapers anymore.
But one of the things that helped me back was like, well, what am I if I'm not working
at a newspaper?
Because I think of myself as a newspaper reporter.
I eventually I made my way to magazines.
And then the magazines, I made the same mistake.
I was like, I'm a magazine editor.
And then there were many times.
Or I was like, maybe I shouldn't be a magazine editor.
But I don't know what to do.
And I think of myself as a magazine editor.
And anyway, then I started to talk to entrepreneurs.
and I discovered that they have this completely different way of talking about themselves and of
understanding themselves. Because what entrepreneurs do is they define what they do in this very
specific way in which they have a clarity on what can't change. I was talking to the CEO of a company
called Foodsters. They started by making baking mixes. I've never heard of them, but it's not my industry,
so there's made me no surprise there. You've heard of one of their co-founders, which is Sarah Michelle Geller,
Buffy. Oh, yeah, sure have. Yes, this would be Buffy the Vampire.
Yeah. Foodsters, you can finally at whole foods and whatever. They make baking mixes. They started
by making baking mixes. It was pretty successful. And then they spent like a year or so planning for this
major change of the business. COVID came along and it like completely disrupted it. Whatever,
the details don't really matter. But anyway, I was talking to Greg, CEO and I asked him,
was it a big bummer to have to make this big change? Like you've been planning for this whole big
rollout of this new definition of brand. And he said to me, you know, it's not because you've got to go
back to like, why do you start a business to begin with? And our mission is to bring joy to people,
with upgraded sweet baked goods or something like that.
And he just tossed it off, but afterwards, I was like, man, that's really powerful.
Like, what you have is an articulation of something that you do that isn't tied to the product
that you make.
We bring joy to people with sweet baked goods.
We bring joy to people.
Okay, you can do that.
It doesn't matter if your product category changes.
It doesn't matter if people don't want baking mixes anymore.
You can find some way to do it.
I realized I need like a version of that for myself.
So I went through this.
It came up with this little exercise.
You want to run through it?
Can I ask you some questions?
I kind of want to go through it because I love practicals, but also I'm like, maybe I do it myself for my own thing.
All right, so here it is. We're going to run the same scenario three times. Somebody comes up to you at a party and they ask what you do. What's the first thing that you're going to talk about? I'll tell you what it is. You're going to talk about your tasks. So I would have said, I'm a newspaper reporter, which means that I go out. I find interesting things and I write stories and I put them in the newspaper. What would you say?
Well, yeah, if I say I'm a podcaster, that's a great way to end the conversation generally.
So I usually would like to say something more grandias, like, broadcaster, because then at least they kind of think maybe you're not just a loser who lives in your mom's basement.
Or that you just want them to download your podcast, which is what I always feel like every time I tell somebody I have a podcast.
We have eight listeners pretty soon, though, nine, huh?
It's going to be great.
Don't forget to review me on iTunes.
Yeah.
Okay, so now that we've done that.
Right, podcaster.
We're going to do this again.
Somebody comes up to your party and they ask what you do.
can't talk about your tasks.
So anything that you would have thought to say
previous time, put it on a table away from you,
can't do it.
So I can't say like I interview people?
You're going to talk about your skills.
Okay, I'm all ears.
I would have said I am very good at talking with people,
finding useful information,
and then processing that information
in a way that's useful for others.
That's what I would have said.
For my job?
No, that would have been what I said for my newspaper job.
But maybe it's true for you.
Oh, because I'll just,
I get it feel like that's very similar to what I do.
So you would say, if somebody said, what do you do?
And you can't talk about your tasks.
You tell them what.
I make brilliant people's wisdom available to others, something like that.
That's great.
I like that.
Okay.
So now we're going to do it one more time.
Somebody comes up to do a party and asks what you do.
Can't talk about your tasks.
Can't talk about your skills.
At this point, what are you going to talk about?
I'll tell you.
Oh, gosh.
What you're going to talk about is your core.
The thing that is so deep inside of you,
that it drove you to develop the skills that enable you to do the tasks.
and my suggestion is that this be a very short sentence, a short sentence that doesn't really
have anything to do with anything that could change about your life. So I'll give you my
example. And you don't have to have one right now because this takes time to think through.
But the answer that I came to for myself is, I tell stories in my own voice. And the reason
I love that phrase is because it has two components to it. I tell stories, not magazine stories,
not newspaper stories, not podcast stories, not books, not standing on a stage. That liberates me
from doing any one kind of thing because if after we are done talking, I check my email,
and Entrepreneur Magazine has sent me a note saying, we appreciate your service, we now hate you,
and we would like you to go away, which I hope doesn't happen, but it doesn't take away my identity
because my identity is I tell stories,
and I can do that in any way.
And then in my own voice,
I am setting the terms for my work.
This is how I want to do it.
I'm not telling somebody else's stories.
I'm not showing up and carrying the ball for somebody.
I've reached a level of my career
in which I tell stories in my own voice.
Now, that is a thing that does not change
in a world of change.
And when you have that,
when you can define the thing about you
that will remain true,
regardless of what changes in your life.
At that point, you have a sense of stability.
You understand what it is that you bring to other people
and bring to the world,
and therefore you are less likely to cling deeply
to everything that could change.
I love this because I resisted doing a live show
from stage for years, and my network was like,
come on, man.
And then Hyundai was gracious enough to be like,
we will give you a pile of cash
that will make this worthwhile so that you're not just taking out
a bunch of risk, which is what it was like before.
And, you know, piles of cash really help.
But they do.
And I told Ryan Holiday that he'd be a great fit for the show, and I knew he would show up
because he's my friend and wouldn't bail at the last minute and leave me, like, chewing my nails
off.
And I did it.
And I went, wow, that was a lot of fun.
All the stress was self-inflicted, every ounce of it.
And I would love to do it again.
And the reason is, to your point, I need to polish this.
But the reason is because I am not a podcaster.
I make space for other people to deliver wisdom to, to, you know, to deliver wisdom to,
the audience. And that could be on a stage. It could be recorded environment. It could be on live
radio. I'm shocked that I didn't realize this because I used to do live radio. And I used to do
interviews that were in different formats in different ways. And yet, I can't imagine not podcasting
because that's the way that I do things now. But it's really obvious that what I do is not podcasting
or what I can do is not just podcasting, that I just have to make that space and have that conversation.
and it really doesn't matter if the internet is involved or squadcast and pre-recorded this and
that and the other thing. None of that is the core of what I'm doing or why I'm doing it.
I was talking to Malcolm Gladwell. Your story reminded me of this little anecdote. I was talking
to Malcolm Gladwell. It's a great name drop, by the way. Well done. When you've got him,
drop them, right? So I was talking about Gladwell, and now I've said it like four times. So I was
talking about Gladwell. And I was interviewing him for the magazine. I was very curious,
like how does he figure out what a Malcolm Gladwell project is?
Because everything that he does feel is so distinctly him.
It does. Yeah.
And it's just like, is there a filter that you use to understand what it is that you should do?
And he says, you know, to the best of my ability, I try not to do that because.
And then this is what he said.
And this is what I think you should keep in mind for those next opportunities and everybody
else should keep in mind for theirs.
Self conceptions are powerfully limiting.
As soon as he said it, I wrote it down.
I stuck it on my wall.
Self conceptions are powerfully limiting.
which is like if you have an idea of what you are, if you have a really strong self-conception,
well, then you will turn down all other opportunities to explore. You will say, I do this one thing.
Oh, yeah. And the most dangerous thing that we can do, if we are not, you know, 95 years old and have
nothing else to accomplish, the most dangerous thing that we can do is define ourselves too narrowly.
That's what you had done for a moment. Like, you broke out of it, but you were like, I'm a podcaster.
For sure. I have a self-consum.
I'm a podcaster and therefore sitting on a stage and talking to people live, that doesn't fit into
my self-conception. That's something else. But look how powerfully limiting that was because you did it
and you discovered, oh my gosh, this fits into my self-conception because my self-conception isn't,
I'm a podcaster. My self-conception is I'm a communicator. And that allows me to do all sorts of
things. And now that you know it, sky's the limit. Sure. I mean, look, it's not like I've never
done a speaking gig or trained in a workshop, but I looked at those as kind of different, almost like side hustles
not as some natural, very natural extension of the core of what I do.
And don't get me wrong, I love podcasting and the community and all the things involved
with it.
But if it evaporated tomorrow, I wouldn't be completely up Schitt's Creek without a paddle.
I would just go back to whatever the new version of radio is, because that's why I'm in
podcasting also, right?
Radio wouldn't put me on, so I put myself on, and then I ended up on the radio and I loved
podcasting even more because I was my own boss and da-da-da-da, here we are.
And to your point about identity, and you write about this,
the book, and I think this is so well said, change seems scary and all-encompassing. And if change
happens to us, which it always does, we worry that we will be changed in an all-encompassing and
permanent way. And if we change in an all-encompassing and permanent way, then who are we
anymore? I always bring back this sort of like traumatic business split, but when, man, the loss of
identity was probably one of the scariest parts of the whole transition because it was like,
I am this podcaster that does this subject matter and this is the show and the name of the show is
associated with me and I am the face of the brand. So who am I anymore now that that's gone? Nobody.
A big fat nobody with nothing to show for himself. And I felt so strongly and so immediately,
but if I had any semblance of all of this or realized that that's what was happening without
just 20-20 hindsight making it really clear, I think the whole thing would have been a hell of a lot
easier for me. Well, I would realize the following. I can ask myself these questions, and this
is a great place to sort of wind things down. What is the first step if we face a big change
and we find ourselves in that panic that I was in? One, what did I overcome? Two, what skill set did I
have then that I still have now? I didn't even think to ask myself that. So of course I just thought,
I'm starting over. Wham? Woe is me. And skills are not the actions you took. It's not I'm a dating
show guy or a movie reviewer, the skill is actually what you could do that enabled you to do your job.
So if you're a movie reviewer, it's not writing, but pattern matching or marketing or humor or
translating visual concepts into the written word, whatever it is. And then finally, what do I know
now that I did not know then? And that was probably one of the largest things that I ignored,
because I knew how to build a freaking business and a show and talk to an audience and broadcast and
edit audio and get it into people's hearts and minds and have them share it and have them be on my
side and help my business. All these things that I just went, I wrote them off and just focused on
the fact that it took me 11 years the first time to build it and then cried for two weeks and didn't
sleep and then realized, wait a minute, this is, it's not possible for it to take nearly as long
because I have these skills I didn't have and I know all these things I didn't know. And for some
reason because I had lost my identity in my mind and I felt like I didn't, I couldn't find it,
I felt like the rest of it was impossible. And none of that was true. I'm so glad that that's where
you brought us to because those three questions are so important whenever you're facing these
kinds of things because we tend to romanticize our past. We say that our success or the thing that
we're good at or the thing that we're comfortable with now was the product of some kind of
circumstance, and that circumstance was fortunate for us and may not be able to be repeated.
It's like, it's so crazy because we hear a lot about how you're supposed to own your failures.
Own your failures.
I mean, we talked about earlier today.
They don't like failure can be data.
Man, we got to own our success too.
We got to look back and say, you know, I did something.
It wasn't luck.
And the reason that I have whatever I am comfortable with right now was because I navigated a whole
bunch of things and they weren't all easy.
And it took a long time, right?
I have my own version of the story that you just told.
I mean, the first time I experienced it,
and I've experienced it many times,
but the first one was I worked at Boston Magazine
as my very first magazine job.
I was like 27 or something.
And then I got offered to work at men's health.
National magazine, moved to New York.
The big time, I was like so excited about it.
It was like 27, 28.
I really, I paused.
And the reason was because I had done so well.
Because you didn't have a six pack?
And I still don't.
I assure you.
You have to have one of those to work at men's health.
Yeah, every guy in the cover.
The dirty secret, of course,
is that like nobody at the magazine
except for the fitness editor actually has a six-pack,
but you know, they make a good magazine.
Sure.
So I was so concerned that I had done well at Boston Magazine.
I made a lot of friends.
I wrote a lot of features.
I did well.
And I thought, maybe this is circumstance.
Maybe this is that I reached the right magazine
at the right time.
I made friends with the right people.
And I don't know if I can repeat this.
Can I go to another place?
Can I start over and have the same kind of success?
and it really helped to be able to go back.
I mean, you go to those questions you had asked for my book.
You know, question number one, what did I overcome?
Go back and think about all the really crappy stuff that was there along the way to whatever
you have now.
I mean, you forget it because of this crazy thing that happens at our brain called fading affect
bias where the emotions associated with bad memories fade a lot faster than the emotions
associated with good memories.
So it's harder to recall in a visceral way the bad things that happened.
trauma is a separate issue, but you know, like just sort of normal experience. And so you forget,
you forget. But if you spend some time being like, what did I overcome? What were the bad things?
Oh, well, there was that time where I botched a story so bad that the staff writer yelled at me and they
didn't talk at me for two weeks. There was this time where like, I couldn't figure out how to edit a story
and they literally had to take it away from me and give it to somebody else. Like, this wasn't just me
like cake walking through. It was hard and I had to figure it out. So once I know that, I can say,
well, question two, what skill set did I have then that I have now?
I mean, you know, the answer for me, I think, was like, I was a hard worker and I was able to learn.
I'm personable, so I was able to build good relationships.
I still have these things.
I'm a good pattern matcher.
And, you know, it's like important to know what I'm good at.
And then number three, like you asked, what do I know now that I did not know them?
I know a lot more.
I know about how to edit stories.
I know how to establish myself inside a magazine.
I know how to function inside of this kind of workplace.
I am, in fact, far more prepared for this next thing than I thought in all.
All it takes is going back to realizing that, like, I was actually the source of my own success.
And I say this not to, like, praise me, but, like, you should do this when you're listening to yourself.
Like, you are the source of your own success.
You just are.
It wasn't some weird coincidence.
And because of that, when change comes, you have things to fall back on, things that you didn't even know about.
And those are the things that are going to carry you forward.
The more that we can just see these as opportunities instead of as resets, the more that we can say, I am prepared for what comes next,
even if I don't exactly know what it is.
I love that.
It's almost like this sort of dovetails with imposter syndrome
and is the opposite of that self-serving bias
that a lot of people have where they're like every success I have
is due to my own doing, but every failure I have is someone else's fault.
This is kind of like the inverse of that.
And I notice a lot of people who have imposter syndrome
are also high performers.
And a lot of high performers also have whatever the opposite of that self-serving bias is
where they go, well, my success is due to luck,
hard work a little bit, timing.
and opportunity that fell into my lap, but all of my failures, okay, those are, I can own some of those.
So there's a lot of like not owning your successes. And so I almost think that successful people have
a tougher time with a lot of this change because they don't necessarily see all of these positive
things that they had. Like in my example, I didn't see most of the positive things that I'd done
is something that I could replicate. I looked at them as, well, we started early and then we had all
as time in the market and all this stuff befell us and the topic was magic at the time and I wrote
this wave of podcasting and dating stuff and whatever. But none of that turned out to really be
the defining truth of what was going to make the Jordan Harbinger show successful. And here
we are, which is kind of funny, but also like, man, I could have used a little heads up there,
universe slash wish I'd read your book. With respect to big changes, you wrote, don't wait for
the moment of pain. Look for the moment of awareness. Sounds brilliant. What is a
mean? It's so important because I think that what we focus on way too often is the thing that we feel
like we're losing or the thing that we feel like we've already done or the thing that we feel like
we've built. People go through changes in four phases. I've talked a bit about it here. Panic,
adaptation, new normal, wouldn't go back. I think the hardest phase of it all weirdly isn't panic.
The hardest phase of it all is wouldn't go back. And the reason for that is because once we go
through this whole thing. And we get to a point where we're now newly comfortable, better than we
were before. We have built something great. We say, I have this thing that's so new and valuable
that I wouldn't want to go back to time before I had it. The most terrible thing is going to happen,
which is that the cycle is going to start all over again. And this thing that you've built that you are
so happy with is going to have to change again. And the most successful people that I meet have
built that reality into the way that they operate. They may not know how it's going to change,
but they know that it is going to change. I am fascinated by talking to people who make
massive changes in their lives and business before they are forced to, because they understand
that by the time they're forced to do it, they're out of options. They can't see what the right
decision is or their options are limited. The story always pops to mind of this guy, Sam,
has started dogfish, the brewing company, and he made this beer called 60 Minutes.
an IPA, it's a wonderful beer, people love it, they desire it, they're calling him. Very quickly,
this beer rockets up to become like 75 to 80% of all sales of dogfish where it's on track
to be. It's defining. It's a defining thing. And you could say, that's what we're out there
to do. We're out there to have a success, right? But Sam knows, Sam has built this awareness
into him that the opportunity is larger than any one moment. The opportunity is in the change.
And what he knows is that when everybody is calling for this one beer, when everybody, all the
restaurants and all the bars and everybody wants to order this one beer. He has got himself a hit
product that he can make a bunch of money on, but he's got a problem. And the problem is that
tastes change. If you build that into your awareness that something is going to change, well, then what are you
going to do? Well, he knows that if everybody just encounters his beer, everybody just encounters
dogfish and says, oh, I know that one beer that they make. Well, then that's cool for a while until
that beer stops being as popular or IPAs stop being as popular. And then he doesn't have a hit product.
Then he is at a hot brand. Then he's an old brand.
And so what Sam did was he limited his sales of his best-selling product.
He capped sales at 50%.
So again, this beer could have been 75, 80% of all sales of dogfish.
He capped it at 50%, which means that people are screaming at him on the streets in Delaware.
They literally screaming at him on the streets in Delaware because he's got like bar and restaurant
owners and people want to have this hot local beer and they are not carrying it.
And it's like, why aren't you carrying it?
And so then they go and they scream at Sam.
And I asked Sam, like, did you ever consider that this was a bad idea?
And he said no, because I understood that this was the opportunity.
It was an opportunity to introduce new styles of beer to people.
It was an opportunity to say, you know what?
We don't just make this one beer.
He would say, look, I'm really sorry.
We make this fresh.
We just don't have it available right now, which was like half a lie because he could have
had it available.
But anyway, like, why not instead try our saizade?
Why not instead carry our whatever?
That is how Sam built a company that became known, not as an IPA brand,
that became an old brand, but rather as an innovative brand.
And he sold that thing for $300 million.
And that is not what you do if you do not believe that change is coming and you do not build it into the way that you think about the world. It is the opportunity. The change is the opportunity. You just have to see it that way.
Jason Pfeiffer, thank you so much. You're such a fun guy to talk to you, man. I mean, not that
that's a surprise. We've been friends for a while, but, you know, the show was fantastic,
so I really appreciate you taking the time. Oh, hey, man, you too. This is so fun. And,
you know, it's funny. This is the first time we've ever officially talked. We've just,
chatted on the phone. It's like talking to you in a whole new way. That's true. We've never
recorded it. If two podcasters have a conversation and it's not recorded, did it really happen?
We finally have evidence. So I appreciate you, man.
I've got some thoughts on this episode. But before I get into that, here's a trailer from
interview with Layla Ali, daughter of legendary boxer Muhammad Ali. She's got a great story about how she
ended up the only other boxer in her family and how she carries her father's legacy. Whether you're
into sports or not, I think you're really going to dig it. You have to have it in you to want to be a
fighter. It's not something that you just go, I think I'll just try boxing, you know, because
you're going to get your ass beat. If you get it in you, when you get that opportunity, it was a brawl.
I mean, it was bloody. It was like crazy. And I was like, I want to do that. You would think anyone,
punching you would hurt, right? Yeah, sure. But as fighters, it's like, oh, that person can punch,
that person can't tap in you, tap, tap, tap, tap. And then every once in a while that, bam, that
hard way, oh, okay, I felt that. If you're listening to your camp saying, she's nothing, and she this
and she that, and then you have to get your ass in there, and then you feel that punch, like, no, she can
punch, no, she's not just a pretty bad. You see me across that ring looking at you, like,
yeah, remember all that stuff you talk? Now it's about to happen. It's just me and you,
and nobody else can get in there with you, you know? And it's like, I'm going to remind you of all the things
you said, they didn't know that street side of me. Not everyone has that. You don't have to.
eat someone, you see how they walk, see how they hold this stuff,
see if there's any fear in their eyes.
What was your father's reaction to you wanting to box?
He didn't like it.
No?
No.
You guys were sparring before you even put the gloves on.
Oh, yeah.
He supported me, though.
He came to a lot of my fights.
He couldn't beat all of them.
I could always see that glare in his eyes of him being proud
and just to come into that arena and having everyone chanting,
Ali, Ali.
You just see him light up to see me in that ring
and him just remembering himself.
Our boxing styles were similar, the way I'm shaped,
my body shape.
So just seeing all of that had to be a super crazy experience for him.
For more with Layla Ali, check out episode number 309 of the Jordan Harbinger Show.
I promise you Jason was going to be great, and I delivered on that, I hope.
Really, such a sharp dude.
Adapting to change means we know what is changing and what is not.
So our job might change, but our skills and our identity do not.
This info would all have been huge for me, by the way, upon my transition to a new business,
the Jordan Harbinger show for my old one. Like I said earlier, I really wish I had had Jason's
book at that time, which didn't exist, so I can't kick myself too much. But it really would have
saved me a lot of stress and wondering and the agony of uncertainty. And I talk about uncertainty
in very early episodes of the Jordan Harbinger show. I think it's like episode four or something
along those lines. I'm really going through it at the time. You can hear it in my voice.
When change happens and we panic, we feel like we are experiencing something that nobody else has
and that our circumstances are unique.
And I remember that feeling quite precisely.
But it's important to remember that somebody else has dealt with this before.
Even if you really think your circumstances are unique, yes, maybe superficially they are,
but somebody else has gone through this, managed it, survived it, and, man, it's just,
it would have been so nice to know that.
Further, we often wonder if our future can be as bright as our past.
Again, something that it really rings true for me that I really went through early on in
the building of this show, this business.
If you ask the news we watch and that we read, this is impossible, right?
Of course, everything is getting worse and it was all better before.
This is called the declinism fallacy or the declinism fallacy.
The past was better.
The future will be worse.
It is a logical fallacy for the reason.
The idea, the very fact that it is not true, it is an illusion.
So once we realize that that is not true and we realize that now is a great time to be alive
and that we actually control many elements of what our future will be, it is a gift.
It is very empowering.
In the book, there's a lot of practicals to deal with change.
It's a really good read for you no matter where you are in your career.
There's a lot of stories.
Jason writes like he speaks in many ways,
so it's actually kind of a fun read,
just like this conversation was a fun listen.
I hope anyway.
So a big thank you to Jason Pfeiffer.
Everything will be linked up in our show notes at Jordan Harbinger.com,
book links and all that.
Books at Jordan Harbinger.com slash books.
Please use our website links.
If you buy books from the guests,
it does help support the show.
transcripts are in the show notes, videos up on YouTube.
Advertisers, deals, discount codes, all from our sponsors here are at Jordanharbinger.com
slash deals.
Please consider supporting those who support this show.
I'm teaching you how to connect with great people and manage relationships using systems,
software, and tiny habits.
Jason would highly recommend this as well.
I didn't harp on the networking stuff because we talk about it all the time here on the show,
but it is a part of a stable and successful career.
The six-minute networking course is free over at Jordan Harbinger.com
course, teaching you how to dig that well before you get thirsty and build relationships before
you need them. Most of the guests on the show subscribe and contribute to the course. So come join us.
You'll be in smart company where you belong. This show is created an association with podcast one.
My team is Jen Harbinger, Jace Sanderson, Robert Fogart, Millie Ocampo, Ian Baird, Josh Ballard,
and Gabriel Mizrahi. Remember, we rise by lifting others. The fee for this show is you share it
with friends when you find something useful or interesting. And if you know somebody who is maybe
going through some uncertainty, trying to get ahead in their career, please do share this episode
with them. The greatest compliment you can give us is to share the show with those you care about.
In the meantime, do your best to apply what you hear on the show so you can live what you listen,
and we'll see you next time. This episode is sponsored in part by Happiness Lab podcast.
Our minds lie to us all the time about what'll make us happy. On the Happiness Lab podcast, Yale
Professor Dr. Lori Santos, who's been a guest on this very show as well, explores evidence-based
strategies to live with more joy.
experts hit the gym to flex their friendship muscles, unravel the mystery of why fear and pain
can feel good, and examine the You Only Live Once philosophy, I guess the Yolo philosophy, and why
it doesn't work like you think. Along the way, she's joined by guests like Grateful Dead drummer
Mickey Hart and Star Trek's Will Wheaton to bust the myths surrounding happiness. Listen to the
Happiness Lab wherever you get your podcasts. When it's time to scale your business, it's time for
Shopify. Get everything you need to grow the way you want, like all the way.
Stack more sales with the best converting checkout on the planet.
Track your cha-chings from every channel, right in one spot,
and turn real-time reporting into big-time opportunities.
Take your business to a whole new level.
Switch to Shopify.
Start your free trial today.
This episode is sponsored in part by Something You Should Know podcast.
Finding a new great podcast shouldn't be this hard, so let me save you some time.
If you like the Jordan Harbinger show, you'll probably like Something You Should Know with Mike Carruthers.
It's one of those shows that makes you smarter in a practical, useful way.
Same curiosity vibe we go for here, just in a fast-focused format.
Mike brings on top experts and asks the exact questions that you'd want to ask,
and the topics are all over the place in the best way.
Recently, they've covered things like why we care so much what other people think,
the benefits of laughter, why sports fans get so invested,
and what makes people like you or not.
The through line is always the same.
Smart ideas you can actually use in real life.
Something you should know has been featured in Apple's shows we love,
and it's got thousands of five-star reviews
because it's consistently interesting.
So if you want another show that scratches
that I want to understand
how people in the world really work,
itch, search for something you should know
wherever you get your podcasts.
Look for the bright yellow light bulb
and start listening.
You can thank me later.
