The Jordan Harbinger Show - 874: Ayurveda | Skeptical Sunday

Episode Date: August 6, 2023

Is there scientific legitimacy to the ancient Indian medicinal practice of Ayurveda? Dave Farina joins us on this Skeptical Sunday to find out! On This Week's Skeptical Sunday, We Discuss: Ayurveda is an ancient Indian medicinal practice based on balancing doshas (life forces) and natural therapies like diet, yoga, and meditation. The belief in ancient wisdom's superiority to modern medicine and the allure of nature attract some people — especially those with anti-pharmaceutical sentiments — to Ayurveda. The marketing and commercialization of Ayurvedic products and treatments contribute to its multi-billion dollar industry. Ayurveda's emphasis on "detoxing" and "toxins" is based on misused terminology and misconceptions. Critics argue that Ayurveda's reliance on outdated concepts and lack of scientific evidence makes it ineffective and potentially dangerous. Despite the criticism, Ayurveda continues to be popular globally, with many proponents advocating its holistic approach to health. Integrative medicine seeks to combine Ayurveda and other alternative practices with evidence-based modern medicine, though this remains controversial. Connect with Jordan on Twitter, Instagram, and YouTube. If you have something you'd like us to tackle here on Skeptical Sunday, drop Jordan a line at [e-mail] and let him know! Connect with Dave Farina on YouTube, Twitter, and Instagram, and check out the Professor Dave Debates podcast here or wherever you enjoy listening to fine podcasts. Dave’s book, Is This Wi-Fi Organic?: A Guide to Spotting Misleading Science Online is out now! Full show notes and resources can be found here: jordanharbinger.com/874 This Episode Is Brought To You By Our Fine Sponsors: jordanharbinger.com/deals Sign up for Six-Minute Networking — our free networking and relationship development mini course — at jordanharbinger.com/course! See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

This episode is sponsored in part by Conspiruality Podcast. You know how I'm always talking about critical thinking and spotting manipulation? Well, there's a podcast that's all about dismantling new age cults, wellness grifters, and conspiracy mad yogis, basically the wild overlap of spirituality and misinformation. It's called the Conspiruality Podcast. The hosts, a journalist, cult researcher, and a philosophical skeptic, dive deep into how this stuff spreads, from Project 2025 and the Heritage Foundation's dystopian vision of the future to how former leftists get pulled into far-right conspiracies.

An interesting episode to check out is called Speaking Truth to Goop, where Jen Gunter breaks down the pseudoscience behind the wellness industry in a way that is super entertaining and eye-opening. It's sharp, funny, and makes you a lot harder to fool, which, if you listen to this show, you know I'm all about that. From exploring cults to analyzing our cultural and political landscape, the Conspiratuality Podcast will help you stay informed against misinformation and resist fear tactics.

Find Conspirality on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, and wherever you get your podcasts. Welcome to Skeptical Sunday. I'm your host, Jordan Harbinger. Today I'm here with Skeptical Sunday co-host Dave Farina. On the Jordan Harbinger show, we decode the stories, secrets and skills are the world's most fascinating people

and turn their wisdom into practical advice that you can use to impact your own life and those around you. Our mission is to help you become a better-informed, more critical thinker, and during the week, we have long-form conversations with a variety of amazing folks from spies to CEOs, athletes, authors,

thinkers, and performers. On Sundays, though, we do skeptical Sunday where a rotating guest co-host and I break down a topic you may have never thought about and debunk common misconceptions. Topics such as why tipping makes no sense, acupuncture, astrology, homeopathy, hypnosis, and more. And if you're new to the show or you want to tell your friends about the show, I suggest our episode starter packs as a place to begin. These are collections of our favorite episodes organized by topic to help new listeners

get a taste of everything we do here on this show. Topics like persuasion and influence. technology and futurism, China, North Korea, crime and cults, and more, just visit jordanharbinger.com slash start or search for us in your Spotify app to get started. By the way, if you use the Stitcher app to listen to this show, they are getting rid of that app, August 29th. It will no longer be useful. So switch to a different app if you use the Stitcher app to listen to this podcast. If you're on Android, I suggest podcast addict. It might not be as pretty, but it works really well. if you're on iOS, Apple, you should use Overcast, in my humble opinion, or Apple Podcasts,

but definitely no longer Stitcher. It will not update anymore in the next couple of months. So if you're using the Stitcher app, now is a good time to switch to a new podcast app. And if you have any problems with this, you're kind of boomer in terms of your tech. You don't know what to do. You can always email me, Jordan atjordanharbinger.com. I will try to point you in the right direction, but the Stitcher app will no longer work for this show. All right, Dave.

Now, everybody wants to be healthy, right? It seems like everywhere we look, we're met with a barrage of products and services that are meant to help us eat right, exercise, stay fit, center our minds, become the most effective and enlightened cosmic being that we can possibly be. Well, health and wellness, especially wellness, is a multi-billion dollar industry and not without basis, since being healthy allows us to enjoy our lives to the fullest, both in terms of longevity and quality of life, but when this industry overlaps with medicine. The result is not always a paragon of scientific legitimacy. Aspects of marketing and pseudo-spirituality, sometimes overshadow, foundational scientific knowledge, and empirical evidence. One such phenomenon that exemplifies this way of thinking is called Ayurveda. Am I pronouncing that correctly, by the way? I think so.

Ayurveda. That's how I said. Yeah. Not that I have to respect it too much because it's a bunch of bologna, as we're going to get into. But what is this ancient practice? How did it come to be? How is it relevant today? To dissect this, as always, is our resident pseudonautil.

pseudoscience debunker Dave Farina of the YouTube channel, Professor Dave explains. And Dave, welcome back to the show. Thanks for having me. I'm ready to go. You mean to a higher plane of existence with the ancient practice of Ierveda? Yeah, I'm right there with you. Absolutely, yeah, let's do it. So, Dave, I think a lot of people have maybe heard of Ayurveda, especially if they do yoga or other stuff that's tangential to it. Not that yoga's nonsense, we should do one about that because it has a lot of benefits. But I think a lot of people who are into one maybe Indian pseudo-spiritual thing, they grab onto a lot of this because their classmates are into it. We can talk about that another time. But I'm not too familiar with this. I've seen it in emails.

I've seen it in kooky YouTube comments. As a baseline, can you tell us a little bit about what it is, the foundational ideas and so forth? Absolutely. So Ayurveda is an ancient Indian medicinal practice from India, and it dates back a few thousand years. So this is quite ancient. We're talking before the ancient Greeks ancient. So that also means. that it's before science, ancient. And what this belief system proposes is that disease is due to an imbalance in a person's consciousness. So some kind of stress is being placed on a person's consciousness, and that is manifesting as some kind of illness. So the correct response to disease, according to Ayurveda, is to partake in certain kinds of natural therapies and lifestyle changes. So we're talking about

changing the diet, massage, yoga, meditation, using certain kinds of herbs. And all of this is meant to restore a balance between mind, body, and spirit, and get you healthy again. Okay, so that sounds a little vapid, but not totally baseless, I suppose. We know stress causes or exacerbates a lot of conditions, and that lifestyle changes can help with that. So, yeah, I mean, so far so good, right? Sure. Okay, so what I gave you is kind of the least offensive version. So obviously it's true that diet is linked with your health, and there are some herbs that have medicinal properties, and things like yoga and meditation can improve your mental health, and so by extension, they can

have some influence on your physical health. But this is as good as we're going to get here. Once we dive into some of the specifics and like the terminology, it gets pseudoscientific real fast. I figured it might. A lot of this stuff does, right? Because it's great to have this whole, hey, you know, you do this for that. And everyone goes, yeah, I guess I do drink tea for caffeine but so why can't tea cure other ailments? And you're like, well, and then it's like something, something chakras. All right. So let's get down to another level then. Let's talk about some of the terminology associated with this system of thought, because it seems to be heavy in its own language system, as a lot of this stuff is. Yeah, heavy on the jargon. So in Ayurveda, they talk

about prakriti, which is the body's constitution, which is supposed to be unique to each individual, and dosha, which are life forces. So the goal is to partake in these activities and behaviors, which will balance these forces, just like someone else will talk about balancing chakras or things like that. So additionally, it proposes that the universe is composed of five elements, water, earth, fire, and space. Captain Planet, plus one. Yeah. Plus, yeah, they're adding another area, but these combined in different ways to form the humors of

the body. So Vata dosha, pita dosha, and kapa dosha. So these control our physiology. So we're talking about different tissues, fluids, metabolism, and so forth. The funny thing is that it's pretty comparable to other ancient philosophies in terms of the composition of matter and of living organisms, which is simply to say that it is profoundly incorrect. I'm glad you mentioned that because whenever we say it has a lot in common with other ancient philosophies that evolve separately, people go see proof that they knew something we didn't. And it's

like, no, it's just a very obvious sort of coincidence that they look around and go, hmm, we have air, we have water, we have fire, we have dirt, and, you know, I don't know, whatever space. I assume they didn't mean outer space. They just meant space, which is also air, but whatever. Or they got it from each other, but who cares? The point is we moved on. These are wrong. That's not it. Right. I guess a lot of places probably thought that the sun moved around the earth and that doesn't make that true either just because multiple civilizations observed something that made that look like that was happening. I have to say a lot of those things sound like appetizers and not necessarily spiritual jargon, but I guess that says more about me than it does about Iroveda. Okay, so you don't

see too many people pointing to these primal elements or the humors anymore. Right. I mean, that's the point. We've moved on, right? Science has moved on. We have the periodic table of the elements to tell us what the matter around us is made of. So water is not an element. It's made of hydrogen and oxygen. We didn't know this back then, so the philosophies can't reflect that, but this is something that we've known for centuries now. So to think that a few millennia ago, we had better knowledge than now, it's just insane. So the same goes for humorism, right? We all know about like the bile and the blood and the phlegm. And so this was stuff that, well, you know, it lasted a little too long, but sort of an ancient way of looking at this. And it was a forward

step thousands of years ago in that it was the first time people were attributing illness to actual parts of the body and physical mechanisms instead of divinity and demonic possession and things like that. But it's still completely wrong, which is why nobody performs bloodletting anymore. But the point is that we have an actual concrete understanding of the human body and how it works now. That makes a lot of sense. I do have to put a little asterisk by bloodletting because I can't remember what show I talked about this on. And I said, that's why we don't do bloodletting anymore. these people DM me and they were like, actually, I have bloodletting done because I have a disease that I think it's something with too much iron in the blood, and the treatment is actually bloodletting.

Interesting. They don't get it done at a barbershop and let it drip out onto the floor and into the streets of London. Yes, very controlled. Right. Yeah, there's, I assume there's some more sort of sanitary ways of doing this at a doctor's office or possibly in a hospital where they get treated. But apparently it still exists.

I don't think they call it bloodletting. Maybe they do, actually. So either way, we mostly don't perform bloodletting anymore, except for things that require bloodletting, which are very small, not because he has chills sometimes. Well, what we have to do is drain his blood because he's got vapors in there. Too much blood, not enough phlegm, right? We've got to balance the blood and find out. So given what you're highlighting here, it's very clear that we knew very little at the time

when Iervita came about. And objectively, we know much more now. So in order for people to assign any merit to things like Iyrveda, it seems to be like one aspect of their worldview has to be about the allure of the ancient way of thought or back to tradition or something like that. Is that a fair assumption? Yeah, I mean, I think that that's definitely part of it. Certain kinds of people are drawn to the ancient world, you know, which in a way makes sense. A lot of us maybe have a longing for deeper culture, depending on where you live. Like, we're pummeled by modernity everywhere we look. I mean, especially in

America, we have no antiquity here that we've built around. Like in Europe, you have a sense of the passage of time and things like that. But over here, there's a lot of strip malls and fast food and cell phone towers, you know, depending on where you live. So there's something enchanting about ancient India or ancient China or ancient Mesopotamia or whatever. It's fun. It's fascinating from a historical perspective and it's really fun to think about what those people were doing in those times. But this bizarre notion that they held some kind of like privileged or sacred wisdom that is either forgotten or totally unavailable to us now, especially that they knew how to heal and we don't. I mean, this is just ridiculous. Not to mention actually dangerous. You know, thousands of years

ago, we were completely clueless as to the fundamental constitution of matter, how the human body works. We didn't know that molecules exist or cells or genes. We didn't know that pathogens exist and that they cause disease. We were just totally and utterly in the dark about all of it. I mean, that didn't stop us from trying to develop modes of thought focused around human health, based partially on the trial and error of ingesting anything we could find in nature, and partially on spirituality and mythology. But things are much different now. We have science.

Science has been our candle in the dark, and miraculously we've developed an immense body of knowledge regarding all of these phenomena, and this knowledge is what we now use to determine how medicine should operate, not mythology, not superstition, or anything like that. That does make a lot of sense. I actually want to push back on one thing. You said we don't have a lot of antiquity here in North America. We do.

We had Native Americans. It's just that a lot of us, consciously or not, look down on that kind of thing because we're like, where are the big buildings? They didn't build it. It's like, well, maybe they didn't do that. So then people go, yeah, they were spiritual. They lived as one with nature, which is, you know, they were very spiritual. But a lot of modern quacks, we covered this in our ear candling episode, which I think

was the first skeptical Sunday that we did. we did. A lot of people who wrote to me were furious about that episode and they were like, no, the, whatever, Sue Indians have been doing this for thousands of years. And what my researcher did, Dave Smalley at that time, he went and called the Sioux and was like, okay, I'm researching this. And they were like, yeah, that is nonsense. We don't do that. People constantly put that on their websites. It's not an ancient tradition. It's what the grifter at earcandling.com is telling his customers because it makes it sound legit. But no, we don't stick candles in our ears and drain them. It's a scam and they're just using our branding, if you will, of our

tribe to sell this ancient thing. So actually, for all these people that like have nostalgia or long for a more ancient world, they're basically just using that same ancient world to market modern day bullshit and harming those exact cultures and people that they are claiming to represent. It's a side door. Yeah, it's a hack. Tethering a scam to an ancient culture gives it an air of legitimacy. They know that. Yeah. It's ironic because they're like, we want to go back to the ancient world where these wise people knew. And it's like, no, you're actually doing worse than the people who are ignoring us.

You're making us seem quacky. And you're some white dude from Ohio making money off of us. Like, GFY is the PG version. Yes. Talk about appropriation. Yeah. Yeah, exactly. Like, we were better off when you ignored us and let us do our own thing.

It is also cute. You just use the word miraculous to describe scientific progress. So as fun as it seems, the idea that something. must be good just because it's ancient, it just doesn't hold any water. Yeah, look, if anything, there's an inverse correlation, right? What we thought back then is quite unlikely to be accurate. I mean, it could be accurate, but the odds are against it. I mean, we thought the Earth was the center of the universe. We didn't know anything about anything, right? Ancient does not equal good. If you want to balance those dosha, you're going to want to hear from the fine products and services

that support this show. We'll be right back. To get links to all the deals, discount codes, and ways to support the show. They're all on one page, Jordan Harbinger.com slash deals. You can also search for any sponsor using the AI chatbot on the website as well. Please consider supporting those who support the show. Now, back to Skeptical Sunday. There has to be another angle people are taking, because I'm not sure that everyone is obsessed with the ancient aspect. It seems like this has a lot to do with nature lovers when you think about it. I'm on the fence here about the ancient versus natural angle. Yes, so that would definitely be the other angle more than anything temporal naturalism. There's a lot of allure there, and that's inevitably kind of the centerpiece of the modern

incarnation of the system. So that's more of the angle of nature, good, man, bad. I think that's a little silly, and I used to get on board with this. It was like, yeah, things are complicated now, and it's easier just to be like, I like simple, I like nature. But then when you start learning about nature and you go to the Amazon, you realize that a lot of things there can and will just absolutely willfully kill you without any thought whatsoever. And things we make can save lives. And even people who lived in the Amazon with absolutely no clothes and ate leaves and did things like that that are completely natural, they're like, oh yeah, you don't want to touch that. And if you do, you have to go have this

shaman help you by sucking the venom out. Yeah, they use smoke and leaves and flowers and paint you, but the real life-saving part is him sucking the venom out of that snake bite. And that is a human invention. Yeah, the naturalism, I mean, it's not just organisms that are kill you. I mean, we're talking about nature in general. I mean, it's a dichotomy, right? Nature is the sun and water and trees, and it's the lovely, pretty things, but it's also drought and famine and pestilence and plague. It's tidal waves and hurricanes. Nature really sucks sometimes. And what humans have done to understand and manipulate nature on the fundamental level, I mean, we're talking about with chemistry and things like that, it's absolutely incredible. I think that people do not have

sufficient appreciation for modern medicine and our understanding of human physiology. So it's just sort of a primitive and faulty way of thinking with Iroveda. We now have this much better understanding of how the body works and what diseases are in terms of pathogens and genetics and epigenetics and other aspects of human physiology. So that should totally eclipse any ancient approach to describing these phenomena in terms of elements, life forces, balancing of things, anything like that? Yes, it should. In fact, the balancing thing, right? That's one of the primary myths that needs to be dispelled. So there's this obsession in Ayurveda with balance. There must be balance of the three dosha's and imbalance is what causes disease. This is totally meaningless. Like, apart from

dosha's not being a thing in reality, more generally, there's this misconception that there's like a perfect state that one can attain and that if you just eat the right thing and you do the right amount of yoga and everything will be in this perfect harmony and you'll be purified and transform into a demigod. I mean, it's just total nonsense. There is no perfection possible with the human body. There's no perfection in the natural world in general. The body is imperfect. The body degrades. The cellular machinery makes mistakes. There is no magic recipe to transcend any of this. We are decaying meat sacks and we have to embrace that aspect of the human experience. Now, again, have your healthy diet, have your exercise routine, have your meditation, have your

herbs, if you really like them. But it's just that too many people are on this wild goose chase for the perfect state of being and it's not there. It's a facade, right? Billions of radioactive nuclides are decaying in your body every second of every day and causing mutations in the genome of every cell in your body. On a long enough timeline, every organism would get cancer for this reason alone. There's nothing about your diet or any of this stuff that can escape the inevitable breakdown of biological systems. What is a nuclide? I don't even know if I've ever heard that word. A nucleus. So a nucleide just means a particular type of atom of that element, essentially. Different isotopes, essentially, yeah. Oh, okay. It could just be a high-energy photon.

There are different modes of radioactive decay, but whichever one it is, you've got to high energy particles that are flying out of there. And if it strikes DNA, it can cause a change to one of the bases in the DNA, which then when it replicates, you have the wrong base on the other side. So there's mutations that are happening all the time, not just because mutagens that we eat or breathe or something like that. It's just happening. I mean, this is beyond the cellular machinery just making mistakes when it copies the DNA. There's that. But there's also radioactive nuclei in your body that are causing damage to the DNA all the time. It's just happening. That's just how it is, you know. Right, and these radioactive materials are naturally occurring, right? It's not because

of Chernobyl or something like that. No, no, no, potassium. Potassium 40 is the most abundant radio. I'm pretty sure it's 40. I should double check that. Yeah, I think it's potassium 40 is the most abundant radioactive nucleide in your body. But all different hydrogen and carbon, I mean, they all have isotopes that decay, right? Some of them decay much more rapidly than others. They have a shorter half-life. And so you get more disintegrations, but you have so many atoms, your body that these decay events are happening constantly all the time. Does that mean bananas are radioactive or does that mean everything in the world is radioactive at some level?

Pretty much everything in the world. I mean, I can't think of anything that would have 0% of any radioactive nucleide. I mean, of course, with most things we're talking about a level that is utterly insignificant, but it doesn't negate the fact that these nuclear processes are happening all around us all the time. So interesting. Probably a totally different show and thank you for entertaining my tangent here. So are there people who try to modernize this at all? Are there people who try to blend this with current scientific knowledge to try and keep it alive? I see that happen a lot with, I won't say scams, but I will say any sort of health trend. It's like, look, how this overlaps with modern science and they're just cramming the square peg through the round hole as hard as they can. Yes, definitely. So some people go away from the ancient thing and they do more of like an anti-farma thing or something like that. So they try to reinterpret the dosha's and the humors and assign them concrete rules.

within metabolism and digestion and immune function, you know, more of like a modern vernacular. And it's just, I mean, it's meaningless, right? That we don't need any of these things to describe those systems and those functions is what makes them totally superfluous, right? Immunologists understand the immune system and they don't need those words to talk about it, right? They don't add any understanding or knowledge. There's no correlation with anything in a substantive way. So there's no reason to use this terminology or hang on to this way of thinking or anything like that.

unless you're making your living, selling it, in which case you have a huge incentive to hang out of this terminology and we're thinking, okay. Correct. But yeah, people do this anyway, right? Are there actual schools? I mean, of course there are schools that teach this stuff, but are there accredited schools, medical schools that teach this stuff? So kind of, yeah, which is alarming. So, I mean, not just because of the cognitive aspect. It's disheartening that people who want to understand the human body feel compelled to shove spirituality where it doesn't belong. But no, more so we're talking about the greedy. side of the coin. So in this case, we're talking about the validation of pseudoscience for profit. I've talked about this on my show before. A guy that I know is in medical school in Canada, and he'll tell me about homeopathy. And I'm like, well, they'll debunk that in medical school. And he's like, no, I'm in a homeopathy class in my medical school in Canada. And I'm thinking, why is there a homeopathy class in your medical school in Canada when this is not a real thing?

And that's a different episode of Skeptical Sunday. But it's amazing to me that that homeopathy any more than a footnote in one class that says, here's a bunch of fake stuff that doctors have tried before, and homeopathy is one of them, and it's one lecture, or it's half a lecture. It's a history of medicine footnote. Right. Yes, exactly. It's up there with chakras, and it's up there with humors and different types of vapors or whatever.

Right. So, man. So people are profiting off of those who will pay money to get this training or these certifications or whatever it is. I've seen this before. Yeah, so that's part of it. I mean, we're not talking about Harvard Medical School or something, you know, but low-level institutions will cash in on the demand as they're not sacrificing much credibility by offering this.

But the point is, if enough people are willing to spend money on something, they want it, they want the homeopathy thing, they want the naturopathy thing or the Ierveda thing, somebody's going to sell it to them, right? That's just a fact of life. But the educational aspect is nothing compared to the greater marketplace. Of course. So people are going to sell things to make a buck with any sort of pseudoscience. no news there, but what sorts of things are they selling, especially with the Iyerveda?

Yeah. So, I mean, it's all about this pancha karma method of therapy. So we're saying it's about bodily rejuvenation and cleansing of toxins. So the thing about it is it's very popular because it merges seamlessly with spa culture. There's a term I've never heard. That's funny. I mean, I don't know if I made it up or not, but people love spas, right? I mean, some people really like I mean, there's, you know, spas, there's nothing wrong with spas necessarily. But with this, you've got your powders and your pasts and your oils and your tinctures and your aromas and to varying degrees of legitimacy or efficacy. But the point is people love this stuff.

It's an enormous industry. Yeah, I can kind of see it now. The high-end Kardashian line of Ierveda oils, it practically sells itself. What you mentioned, this thing about toxins, what is that? That's a term that I feel gets thrown around so much. It doesn't even mean anything anymore. Yes. It is very much a buzzword that gets thrown around in practically every variety of alternative medicine

and it is used improperly. It is not well understood. So the rigid definition, a toxin is a poison or venom of plant, animal, or microorganismal origin. So it is a substance that's harmful to the human body, even at low doses. But the key thing is that it is specifically produced by a living organism and causes disease. So it is produced by a living organism without exception, by definition. But that's not really how people use the word, right? They're talking about pretty much everything that could maybe be sort of bad for you and then a bunch of stuff that they just assume now is bad for you because why not? Yeah, people do not associate it with living organisms. They generally mean it to mean nasty, harmful, man-made synthetic chemical. Again, naturalism is kind of the centerpiece of all this. So the point is to instill the imagery that all the nasty man-made bad man from the factory chemicals are all over you and inside you. and you need this lovely natural stuff to flush it out and return to your perfect state of harmony with

nature again. But it doesn't mean that, right? Toxins are made by living organisms exclusively. And the concept of detoxification, I mean, it just doesn't mean anything in this context. Yeah, I know people who are just obsessed with the concept of detox. And I tell them I got a liver and two kidneys, and that's kind of all the detoxification that I need. Look, I guess there's probably exceptions. Like if I get radiation poisoning, I need some iodine to protect me. my thyroid, but even that's not detoxification, it's just protecting something against radiation. Correct. Yeah, it's not this concept of, oh, I got the bad stuff in me, and I got to flush it out, and I got to sweat it out, and I got to drink the smoothie. It's just not a thing.

So apart from the potions and creams and whatnot, Ayurveda has something to do with a diet that's prescribed here, right? What's going on with the food aspect? Yeah, so, of course, it's all based on what was available in ancient India, so there's different combinations of butter and rice and honey and milk and other foods. Tasty stuff. I mean, you know, there's no problem with food. It's stuff that they would eat back then and we still eat and it's delicious. But some of these combinations are supposed to make you sweat out the toxins and some of them

are supposed to make you vomit out the toxins and some of them are supposed to make you poop out the toxins. And if you eat the right thing and it makes you do the right thing, then once again, the theme here is that you can get back to this perfect normal balanced state that just is not a real thing. Speaking of shameless capitalism and vehicles for Mark, here's a word from our sponsor. We'll be right back. Thank you once again for listening and supporting the show, deals, discount codes, and ways to support us, Jordan Harbinger.com slash deals,

or use the AI chatbot. Now for the rest of Skeptical Sunday. I hear about this sometimes with certain psychedelics, too. They're like, oh, I took the ayahuasca, and then I was projectile vomiting to the point where everything was hurting, and then I was hallucinating, and then I was sweating, and then I was crapping myself. And I'm like, that's just poison. I'm not saying there's no benefit to psychedelics. Far from it. I mean, there's a lot of research in this area. But it's psychological.

Yeah, you're not puking out your trauma from childhood. You're puking out the thing you ate earlier because you ate a poisonous plant. Your body is fucking freaking out. And then experience helps you deal with the trauma and grow as a person. But the puking is not. Yeah, the whole shitting yourself thing potentially optional in the therapeutic sense of the word. Correct.

So, all right. It sounds like we have the general vibe of this system. Disease caused by imbalance. So we have to use these natural things. to get rid of the toxins and get back to the balance. But like you said, this is illusory. So is there anything positive that we can take from the system? Do we chuck it all away?

Are there aspects of it that can be retained? Yeah, I mean, there's nothing wrong with wanting to have a good diet. It's great. If you want to meditate, that's great. And honestly, there's nothing inherently wrong with herbal medicine, right? The idea that you would ingest an herb is fine. But the romanticization of these things over empirical medical science. That's what's dangerous. And it's just, it's all too prevalent in modern society. People need to understand

that diet is great for general health, but it can't prevent everything and it can't cure, I mean, almost anything. So same with meditation, right? People need to understand it meditation is great, but it's not magic. There are no chakras. You're not aligning anything or purifying anything with herbs, right? People need to understand that anything of medicinal value from an herb can and has been isolated and purified and put into a pill and it has precisely the same therapeutic effect. The plant itself is not magic. And humans are not limited in the laboratory to what nature has produced by chance. Humans can innovate all kinds of drugs that do not exist in nature that address disease on the molecular level and have actual genuine curative ability, not just placebo. So, you know,

The main thing is just the obsession that society has with naturalism, it's going to be hard to get rid of, but it's something we have to do as a species if we want to have an informed public that is capable of discussing and understanding medicine in any educated way. So if you were to try and help people understand how modern medicine works, as briefly as possible, because that's a whole podcast, right, in each episode seven hours long, where would you start? How can we help people with no background in chemistry or biology understand any of this? So, yeah, I mean, that's the million-dollar question.

If I could flip a switch, that'd be great. If we're being honest, it's not possible in a soundbite. There has to be at least a mild effort on the part of someone to learn. Just a little bit of information in these areas. Not a lot. I mean, we're saying like a high school level understanding, which, I mean, look, technically we are all supposed to receive in high school, right, with chemistry, biology, physics.

But, you know, I feel like it just doesn't stick for a lot of people. Well, there's no way I could pass a chemistry quiz right now. There's no way. And look, I mean, that's fine. Not everybody has to be able to pass chemistry quizzes, but we're looking for some semblance of a scientific worldview to kind of linger, you know, so that you can look at things with the right mindset. But for medicine, let's say there's one thing that needs to be conveyed. It is that disease always has a molecular basis, right? It's something very fundamental on the molecular level. If there is an issue with your body on the molecular level, the solution will also be on the molecular level, hence drugs, which are molecules.

I can feel the nature lovers physically recoil at the word drugs. So let's talk about drugs. What are they exactly? What does the word mean without any of the connotations that people tend to put on that word? Yes, so obviously a lot of connotations there, illicit drugs and this and all these things. So just the textbook definition of a drug is a substance that when introduced to the body generates a non-nutritional physiological effect. Okay, a non-nutritional physiological effect. So the non-nutritional part is in there to exclude food? Yes. So food is not drugs. We're taking that part of the bodily function out of it. Nutrition is not part of this, but anything else that elicits a concrete physiological effect in the body, it's a drug. So what kinds of effect are we

talking about here? So it could be anything, right? Caffeine is a drug because it is a stimulant. It increases activity in your nervous system. Alcohol is a drug because it affects your mood and your motor functions. Psychoactive drugs like hallucinogens affect your cognition and perceptions, that kind of stuff. Okay, so how about medicinal drugs? What's going on there? So with drugs, with this connotation of drugs like the drugs you would be prescribed from a doctor, these are small molecules that interact with some target in the body, typically a protein like an enzyme or a receptor. So let's say there's a bodily function that is happening too much or not enough, we can send a drug in to interact with specific receptors. So maybe it activates the receptor and a signal gets sent to help halt the

bodily function, or to get it started, right? It depends on the situation. Or maybe it silences the receptor and it negates the signal to, again, either initiate or halt a bodily function. So it's very complicated and it varies case by case. So this is a very reductive thing that I'm saying here, but in a very general way, that's what's going on. Drugs are small molecules that fit into the active sites of specific proteins in a way that changes how some aspect of the body is functioning. So this is why something like Ayurveda just completely misses the mark. It has zero ability to describe signaling pathways and gene expression

and all of these things that are actually going on in the body that actually correlate with disease. It just invents nebulous concepts like doshaes that have no basis. in reality. I think that was pretty clean. I mean, I'm able to visualize what you were describing about drugs interacting with proteins to an extent, and it does make sense. But there are those who will be able to wrap their heads around that, but still inevitably ask, okay, how does this tie in with pharmaceutical companies? Right. Iroveda is from nature. It isn't part of the whole big pharma show. So that might be part of the allure. I think you talked about this a few minutes ago

as well. Yeah. Or just in general, this is the main thing that I think unites all anti-science mentality, there's always an anti-establishment bite to it. And so that's where this part comes in here. Pharma makes drugs, just like the drugs that are in the herbs, in some case precisely the same drugs, in fact. Sometimes they are totally different compounds of our own invention. But, you know, contrary to the fever dreams of rabid anti-Farma factions, pharma is not trying to poison anyone or keep anyone sick or hide cures or anything ridiculous like that. They are trying to make drugs that have value in the marketplace so they can profit off of them. Right. So it's not like anyone would claim they aren't profit-driven. I think that part, we can all agree on that. No,

this is not, this is not non-profit. This is not just charity here. I mean, they're profit-driven. Every corporation is profit-driven from Pfizer to Hallmark, right? There's nothing that is being sold that isn't intended to generate profit, including alternative medicine, by the way, and including Ayurveda. That's how capitalism works. And the difference here is that Big Far Farma is a very big industry, right? You know, any gigantic industry will produce some unethical behavior. So banking, telecommunications, energy, and, yes, pharma, as well as the alt health industry, which, by the way, is a billion dollar industry, right?

It's a very big industry. But the ways in which a pharmaceutical industry can be unethical, it does not infringe on basic scientific facts, right? So what a disease is, what a drug is, how we should make drugs to address these diseases. all of that is true whether or not pharmaceutical companies even exist. The ways in which these drugs are sold and distributed and prescribed, these are the things where openings appear to abuse the system and increase profits, right? You can bribe a doctor to prescribe something that's off-label, right? These are the unethical areas where we are failed.

But that's why we have regulatory bodies. They're supposed to safeguard all these avenues. But unfortunately, lobbying exists and corruption exists. and this is the reality of it, but this is not unique to any individual industry. It's not unique to pharma. We deal with it in all of these. So it sounds like it's a good idea to try and separate opinions about how an industry operates from the ways that the body works and the ways that drugs work to separate science from industry, essentially. Exactly. To separate science from industry, that's exactly right. So we should stay vigilant. We need to regulate these industries,

and that's why we have the regulatory bodies, but the discussion of how medicine should be developed, it just doesn't have anything to do with that. It's another sphere entirely. So people who turn to things like Ayurveda specifically as backlash against the pharmaceutical industry, this is totally misplaced, right? Pseudoscience does not become scientific simply because science-based medicine can become corrupted. We have to focus on getting rid of any corruption rather than throwing the baby away with the bathwater and turning to completely unsubstantiated pseudoscience. That's a good way to put it. Pseudoscience does not become science simply because there are problems with how science is implement it. I want to tattoo that on my arm somewhere. Something tells me that you would have the

same view of essentially anything that we describe as alternative medicine. Naturopathy, homeopathy, I'm going to go out on a limb here and presume that all of the same conclusions apply. Yes, almost without exception. I mean, these are all different flavors of the same delusion. Nature, good, man, bad, ancient, smart, modern, dumb, you know, and people are easily ensnared by these things because it gives them an avenue to feel wise and special and worldly and connected and spiritual. So it's like selling the feeling of having circumnavigated the evil system. And then now you're connecting with something real, something, a deeper tier of reality. But ultimately, it's a facade.

It's a vehicle for marketing. Speaking of marketing and capitalism, I believe you expand on these themes quite significantly in your book, which I have read. Do you want to give it a quick plug? You talked about it on the show as well. Yes. Yeah, it's called Is This Wi-Fi Organic, a guide to spot. misleading science online, and I talk quite a lot about alternative medicine and things of all

the nature what we've been talking about. But then, you know, the basic information in chemistry, biochemistry, biology, and physics, little primers that kind of help you be able to spot this stuff. Really just a handy guide for a more science-based worldview. A noble cause. Also, again, we discussed this book in the episode that I first did with you probably a couple years ago now. That was episode 745. Thanks for joining us again, Dave. Really interesting. Thanks for having me. I've got some thoughts on this episode, but before I get into that, I speak with the infamous Fire Fest's Billy McFarland from inside federal prison, where he's serving six years for fraud and on the hook for $26 million in restitution. Here's a quick bite.

You will not be charged for this call. This call is from. An inmate at a federal prison. Hang up to decline the call or to accept dial five now. When I asked before on our first call, if you were at Conman, we had 10 seconds of silence. Is this the new Billy that we're hearing, or are you the same Billy that tried to pull off the fire festival? When I think about the mistakes that are made and what happened, there's no way I can just describe it other than what the fuck was I thinking. I was wrong, and I hope now that I can in some small way make a positive impact. Once you knew that the festival wasn't going to go as planned, and why didn't you call it off?

So a lot of people don't know, but the decision to cancel the festival was made when I was told that three people had died at the event. Thankfully, no one was actually physically hurt in any way. But up until the last second, I believed incorrectly we could pull it off and obviously I was wrong. We had something called the urgent daily payments document

and basically it was his Google Excel sheet. Essentially it was a list of payments that we had to make that day or else the festival couldn't proceed. In the couple of months leading up to the event, It went from a couple thousand dollars a day to a few million dollars a day where I'd wake up at night in the morning, find $3 million by noon, and then make the payments by four. How was solitary confinement essentially being locked in a box? Like, that sounds terrible.

It really makes you think. And I think the biggest takeaway was, you know, there was one guy who was serving a 30-year sentence and he was already locked in the same room for over three and a half years when I was there. You had a big vision. I mean, it was huge. And you got so close to something great that everyone wanted to be a part of. people still want to be a part of it. I have to wonder if there's going to be a firefest version too. I assume you wouldn't call it that, but are you thinking of doing something similar?

If there's anything that makes you want to create and build and do, it's being locked in a cage for months or years, are you good to come? For more with Billy McFarlane, including lessons learned on the inside, the value of trust, and Billy's plans for the future once he's served the time he agrees he rightly deserves. Check out episode 422 of the Jordan Harbinger Show. for listening topic suggestions. I believe this was one from a show fan. Those can be sent to me directly Jordan at Jordan Harbinger.com. Show notes at Jordan Harbinger.com. Transcripts are in the show notes. Advertisers, deals, discounts, and ways to support the show, all at Jordan Harbinger.com

slash deals. I'm at Jordan Harbinger on both Twitter and Instagram. You can also connect with me on LinkedIn, and you can find Dave at Professor Dave Explains on YouTube. Once again, a reminder that the Stitcher app will no longer work for any podcasts as of August. 29th, 2023. So if you're using the Stitcher app, time to switch. If you're on Android, podcast addict is a good one, cast box. And if you're on iOS, I suggest Overcast or Apple Podcasts, the Stitcher app is going away, folks. This show is created an association with Podcast One. My team is Jen Harbinger, Jace Sanderson, Robert Fogarty, Ian Baird, Millio Campo, and Gabriel Mizrahi. Our advice and opinions are our own and I'm a lawyer, but I'm not your lawyer.

Do your own research before implementing anything you hear on the show. Remember, we've rise by lifting others. Share the show with those you love. If you found the episode useful, please share it with somebody who could use a good dose of the skepticism we doled out today. In the meantime, I hope you apply what you hear on the show so you can live what you listen, and we'll see you next time. This episode is sponsored in part by Something You Should Know podcast. Finding a new great podcast shouldn't be this hard, so let me save you some time. If you like the Jordan Harbinger show, you'll probably like Something You Should Know with Mike Carruthers. It's one of those shows that makes you smarter in a practical, useful way.

Same curiosity vibe we go for here, just in a fast-focused format. Mike brings on top experts and asks the exact questions that you'd want to ask, and the topics are all over the place in the best way. Recently, they've covered things like why we care so much what other people think, the benefits of laughter, why sports fans get so invested, and what makes people like you or not. The through line is always the same. Smart ideas you can actually use in real life.

Something you should know has been featured in Apple's shows we love, and it's got thousands of five-star reviews because it's consistently interesting. So if you want another show that scratches that I want to understand how people in the world really work, itch, search for something you should know wherever you get your podcasts. Look for the bright yellow light bulb and start listening. You can thank me later.