The Journal. - Are Conservatives Being 'Debanked'?

Episode Date: October 20, 2025

Steve Happ was packing to leave Tennessee for an evangelical mission to Uganda in 2023 when Bank of America told him it was canceling his church’s bank account and his credit cards. Happ soon became the symbol of a conservative complaint: Financial institutions are allegedly ’debanking’ people because of their religious or political views. WSJ’s Alexander Saeedy on President Trump’s fight with the banks over debanking. Ryan Knutson hosts. Further Listening: -How a New 'Anti-Woke' Bank Stumbled -Outcry at Bank of America Over Dangerous Workloads Sign up for WSJ’s free What’s News newsletter. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Steve Hap is a grandfather and a Christian. He founded an evangelical business and non-profit in Africa. The big challenge always when going off to Uganda is how to fit everything in the allotted suitcase. It is a mind game and a physical Tetris. Steve takes regular mission trips to Uganda, and in the spring of 2023, he was packing for another one. I brought baby clothes for some of the orphans that we support. I bring my own breakfast food because I don't really care for their breakfast,

so I bring granola for myself. Steve was ready to go. Everything was in order until he checked the mail. They're identical letters, but they are all referencing a different bank account or a credit card. Five letters, one for each of his accounts with Bank of America. And the letter says, we've made the decision to restrict your deposit account in the next 21 days and close it in 30 days from the date of this letter.

And what was your reaction? Of course, I panicked. My first thought was, wait, this has got to be an error. A week before his Uganda trip, all of his accounts, including his church's account, his charity's account, and credit cards were locked. More than $270,000 were frozen. He had bills due, employees to pay,

money that was supposed to go towards his missionary work. But when Steve showed the letters to his local branch manager, it was so odd because she came back and she said, I'm sorry, I can't discuss this with you. And so that's basically been the way it's been all along. His only clue was a single line that Steve's organization was a business type that the bank had chosen not to service.

And my immediate question was, so what type of business do you think we are? Did you think that, oh, they think that we're like a criminal organization or something? Well, actually, I did think, am I a criminal? I felt like a criminal. Steve wanted answers, but he didn't get any. And so he was left to fill in the blanks himself, and he started to suspect that the bank was biased.

I can't think of any other logical reason because the only way all three of these entities were connected was what we did. And to be clear, when you say it was because of what we did and what we do, what do you mean by that? It's that we're a Christian organization and we are spreading the gospel of Jesus Christ. That's not popular these days.

It's the only conclusion that would make any sense. What else could it be about? Steve's theory, that his accounts were canceled because he and his organization were Christian, caught fire in conservative circles. Bank of America did eventually give an explanation, but not before Steve's story turned into something much bigger, a story that would reach all the way to the White House.

Welcome to The Journal, our show about money, business and power. I'm Ryan Knudsen. It's Monday, October 20th. Coming up on the show, how one evangelical story became a rallying cry against banks. This episode is brought to you by SAP. From pleasing investors, to keeping customers happy. It's your job to make it all happen. Not to worry. With the AI-powered capabilities of SAP,

you can streamline costs, connect with new suppliers, and manage payroll, even when your business is being pulled in different directions, to deliver a quality product at a fair price while paying your people with their worth too, so your business can stay unfazed. Learn more at SAP.com slash uncertainty. At Desjardin, we speak business.

We speak equipment modernization. We're fluent in data digitization and expansion into foreign markets. And we can talk all day about streamlining manufacturing processes. Because at Desjardin business, we speak the same language you do. Business. So join the more than 400,000 Canadian entrepreneurs who already count on us. And contact Desjardin today. We'd love to talk, business.

Steve Hap's Bank, Bank of America, shut down all of his accounts. No warning. No clear explanation. And there's a word for this. The word is debanking. Debanking. Debanking. Debanking. Debanking. Deanking. Debanking would be a good thing. Debanking of conservatives in America.

It essentially refers to the act of losing access to a bank account, banking services, you know, debanking, broadly. kind of captures all of these phenomena. That's our colleague Alexander Saidi. Recently, debanking went from being a niche talking point to one of the most politically loaded words in his world. It turned into this broader social crusade against the biggest banks in the country for alleged discrimination against Christians, conservatives.

And if you weren't in these conservative circles, you might not have really been paying attention to this whole idea that banks were playing politics with access to the financial system. For as long as banks have existed, they've reserved the right to close accounts. Sometimes it's because of overdrafts or fraud or suspicious transfers. Sometimes it's just about risk. Like if they have a customer that's risky, that poses like a threat to itself or to others,

then they have the right not to bank that person. And then obviously it's just like that person has done something that's wrong or dangerous or risky, and they don't want to be affiliated with it. So for their perspective, what they're doing is risk management. Would it even be legal to debank someone because of their religious beliefs, like Steve Happ is saying happen to him? No. No, definitely not.

It would violate civil rights, anti-discrimination laws. Same for political belief. And then obviously, if a bank closes the account of somebody who's stolen a lot of money or has gotten a lot of money through criminal activity, we wouldn't think of them as really, like, discriminating against them, right? Big banks, including Bank of America, have said they don't discriminate based on political or religious affiliation. But that's not how it looks to a lot of conservatives. Alex traces this whole thing back to the aftermath of the 2008 financial crisis.

Back then, many Americans blamed banks for the recession. So a lot of banks started to try and improve their reputations. I would say that after the 2008 financial crisis, banks writ large thought, okay, you know, the financial crisis and our role in it made us appear like we are exploiting communities. So how can we take steps to appear like good corporate citizens? As part of this makeover, banks started taking a stand on social issues. Some stopped lending to coal companies, some pulled out of the gun industry. All of these decisions were taken in a way to sort of be like, look,

just because we're a financial institutions doesn't mean we have a lack of a social compass. Many of these stances were seen as left-leaning. Critics called it woke capitalism. But banks were really under pressure. Post-2008, new regulation heightened scrutiny of banks. In some cases, big lenders justified pulling away from certain industries by framing the decisions in terms of risk, risk of regulatory changes, risk of bad headlines, risk of breaking anti-money laundering laws,

and in the case of gunmakers, the risk of lawsuits from families impacted by a shooting. So as a bank, you could look at that company and say, this customer looks like they might, you know, cause problems for us, and cost us more in compliance and legal fees than we'd ever make in money out of them. So actually, long-term, they're not a good customer and we shouldn't do business with them. One customer banks also stopped wanting to do business with,

Donald Trump. After the January 6 attack on the Capitol, many banks cut ties with him. J.P. Morgan Chase closed the Trump organization's business accounts and the family's personal ones, too. They told me, I'm sorry, sir. We can't have you. You have 20 days to get out.

I said, you've got to be kidding. I've been with you. At the same time, Trump and his company were under civil investigation in New York for fraud. In the bank's eye, President Trump was dealing with a New York probe of the Trump organization

and how it was, like, reporting its financials. From their view, okay, you know, if we choose to bank, this company that's now accused of criminal activity, we run the risk of somehow being, an accessory to the crime.

It could cause us a lot of litigation costs. So our cost-benefit analysis tells us we should actually end this relationship. But unlike President Trump, most people who have been debanked often don't have any idea why. And if banks wanted to shut down a customer's account, how would they usually communicate that to their customer?

They choose to not say much at all. Why would a bank choose not to explain why it was dropping a client. The key reason there is because when a bank sees something that looks like it could be criminal or looks suspicious, banks will often just cut off the relationship, and they're required by law not to tell people if there's an investigation into anything they've done. They can't tell you that we're closing it because you're under investigation, but if they give a reason always, but the only time they don't say the reason,

is because you're under investigation. That might tip their hat in the same way. That's right. But by not telling customers why they lost their accounts, many were left guessing. And that's what happened in Steve Hap's case. Well, I can't imagine they'd close the account because we're feeding orphans

and we're rescuing trafficked girls. Did you wonder if it was because of your... your faith, your mission work, that you were being, that your account was being closed? Initially, no, that didn't enter my mind. That came up later. Later, after he mentioned what happened to a well-connected board member at his church. And he was the one who said, oh my goodness, they are attacking you because of what we do. Soon, a powerful Christian law firm would hear about Steve's story.

And lo and behold, I'm the poster child, pretty banking. That's next. This fall, get double points on every qualified stay. Life's the trip. Make the most of it at Best Western. Visit bestwestern.com for complete terms and conditions. What did your ancestors really do all day? Beyond names, what were their lives like?

With Ancestry's global historical records, you can discover incredible stories about how your ancestors lived and worked. And for a limited time, you can explore select occupation records for free. Imagine finding your great-grandfather's RCMP records or discovering your ancestors' name in the UK and Ireland Nursing Register. Don't miss out. Free access ends August 24th. Visit Ancestry.ca for more details.

Terms apply. Steve Hap was confused. Why didn't his bank want his business anymore? Still, he told our colleague Alexander Saeedy that he was prepared to let the whole thing go until someone with a lot of poll reached out to him. Through somebody who worked with him in his charity, he was connected with this group called the Alliance Defending Freedom.

And tell me about this group, the Alliance Defending Freedom. The Alliance Defending Freedom is definitely one of these right-wing activist groups that very much believes that corporate America has been taken over by left-wing ideology, and that goes from big box retailers to large financial institutions. The lawsuit filed by Alliance Defending Freedom. The Alliance Defending Freedom. Alliance Defending Freedom filed a lawsuit in Texas. That's the nonprofit that won the Supreme Court case last year

on behalf of that Colorado Baker, who didn't want to make a cake for a gay wedding. The group is backed by wealthy conservatives. Donors like Charles Koch and Leonard Leo of the Federalist Society. To conservatives, Steve's story looked like strong evidence that banks were targeting people for their beliefs. Steve has never produced any smoking gun showing that somebody somewhere in the bank

pushed the cancel button because of the Christian affiliation. But I think they saw a really compelling story that banks were being political and an anti-conservative and anti-Christian in how they were gatekeeping access to bank accounts. So after that, Steve started to believe that maybe there really was like an underlying anti-Christian motive

in Bank of America's decision. And what did the alliance defending freedom do to Steve's story? Well, they told everyone about it. We were joined today by Steve Hap, founder of Indigenous Advanced Ministries. They took his story, made it a sort of cautionary tale. They took his photo, photos of him helping poor children in Uganda, and put them on all these one-pagers that they distributed in mostly Republican state houses around the country

and said, this is Steve, this is his story. A Tennessee-based Christian ministry serving impoverished children in Uganda, now accusing Bank of America of religious discrimination after it completely... Steve became a conservative symbol. His story spread online and on cable news. And then more people came forward,

saying they or people they knew were also debanked for their politics. I mean, there was Mark Andreessen, He spoke on the Joe Rogan podcast. You get kicked out of your bank account. You get kicked out of the, you can't do credit card transactions. Eric Trump has been talking about it a lot more in public lately. Sam Brownback, the former Republican governor of Kansas.

She's looking on the computer screen, says that account has been closed. It wasn't just conservatives. Progressives like Senator Elizabeth Warren have also taken on debanking. Warren accuses banks of denying service to low wage earners and locking people out for religious affiliation or political beliefs. Soon, the chorus included the biggest voice of all. But I hope you start opening your bank to conservatives because many conservatives complain that the banks are not allowing them to do business within the bank.

Trump turns it into a campaign trail issue in early 2024. But we're also going to play strong protections to stop banks and regulators from trying to debank you. Trump says we're going to stop the banks from debanking you. And a lot of people had no idea what he was even talking about. I don't know what the hell debank means, but he might have to take de-ambulence to see the doctor. This August, President Trump signed an executive order

accusing banks of debanking conservatives. The Alliance Defending Freedom helped write the executive order, and Steve Hap's story was even relevant. referenced in a draft, though it was later taken out of the final version. The executive order demands investigations and threatens fines for refusing service based on political or religious reasons, which for banks is alarming, because suddenly they could get punished for what used to be a routine business decision. In private, executives are saying, you know, we're really worried that there's going to be a type of witch hunt scenario where these cases

get fished out of obscurity, and somebody whose bank accounts we closed for totally legitimate reasons is going to say, you debanked me because I'm a Baptist or because I'm a libertarian. Alex says that banks' fear of investigations could make them more reluctant

to cancel or reject accounts that they're worried about. And for the banks, why not in response to this just say, okay, fine, we'll just bank everybody. We won't close accounts anymore. They believe a cornerstone of how they make money, is full discretion over who can and cannot be a customer.

In this new regime or whatever where, you know, they might just have to bank everyone no matter what, that could eat into their profits. So they're resisting this notion of broad, fair access is what it's called, where you kind of have to bank anyone. And if you're doing a kind of business, they view risky, they would prefer to not have to bank you, but the way things are shaking out is that they may just have to. And, you know, they'll either pass that cost on to customers or they'll eat it themselves. As for Steve Hap, he was able to find a new bank, and he did go to Uganda as planned. But here's the thing. After Steve's story blew up, Bank of America finally gave a reason for why it closed his accounts.

They started to say, we closed his accounts because he was operating a debt collection business in Uganda, which is a violation of our policies. We don't do small business banking for debt collectors in Africa. A website for a business entity Steve overseas includes a line that says, quote, Our business is dedicated to pursuing the recovery of overdue invoices

on behalf of clients. It also mentions that its customer center is in Africa. According to Bank of America, it looked like two problems in one, a business operating outside the U.S., which their policy for its small business line for bids, and a business in debt collection, a line of work that the bank deems risky. Since Steve's accounts were linked, the bank shut them all down. But it didn't explain this to the guy who needed to hear it most. They never told Steve why they closed the accounts,

but then when it became a story, they started to tell the press about it. But in the absence of information, he deduced that his Christian identity was the reason why Bank of America was cutting off his accounts. Steve says his organization doesn't do debt collection. In two years after this whole debacle, he isn't buying Bank of America's explanation. That annoys me a bit, right? Because they're still sticking with the debt collection story. And that makes no sense to me. Do you still believe that the motive was religious discrimination?

I hesitate to be definitive because we don't know. But I don't know of any other reason. I can't think of any other reason. I asked Steve what he would have done if the bank had just told them the problem from the start. If you said, what's going on and they said, oh, well, we flagged your account because it looks like it's tied to debt collection, and you could have been like... That would have been easy to explain.

To Alex, that's the heart of the matter. The frustrating silence that allowed a story to take on a life of its own. To me, it's that it's not the truth that really matters. It's how it is perceived. In Steve Hap's case, this has become a they-said-they-said situation, yet his story has still become one of the most prominent examples of bank discrimination and has been effectively turned into this rallying cry.

And that's even without a full accounting of what did or didn't happen. So to me, that sort of says a lot about our political culture these days, where it's not necessarily what is or isn't true that matters. it's how you feel about what may or may not be true. That's all for today, Monday, October 20th. The journal is a co-production of Spotify and the Wall Street Journal. Additional reporting in this episode by Dylan Tokar. Thanks for listening.

See you tomorrow.