The Journal. - The Great IPO Frenzy of 2026

Episode Date: June 15, 2026

2026 is set to be a monster year for tech IPOs. SpaceX hit the market with a blockbuster $1.77 trillion valuation while Anthropic and OpenAI are set to go public later this year. WSJ’s investing columnist Spencer Jakab takes us inside the IPO bonanza and explores the risks potentially hiding behind all the hype. Jessica Mendoza hosts. Further Listening: - Is SpaceX Worth the Hype? - Musk vs. Altman Sign up for the Markets A.M. newsletter, The Wall Street Journal's daily investing outlook. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

This year, Wall Street is going to see three of the biggest IPOs of all time. SpaceX broke records on Friday. A huge headline today. The biggest IPO in history. At the closing bell, SpaceX is now worth over $2 trillion. That's with a T. An Anthropic and OpenAI are both set to go public at enormous valuations later this year. Open AI filing to go public about a week after a. Its biggest competitor, Anthropic, did the same thing.

Anthropic, the AI company behind Claude, has filed to go public, setting it up to be one of the biggest initial public offerings in history. OpenAI has filed to go public in a blockbuster IPO that could value the chat GPT creator at more than $1 trillion. By some measures, this is the biggest year ever for IPOs. Our colleague Spencer Jacob writes an investing column. As a matter of fact, just the one for SpaceX, exceeds basically all of the IPOs that happened during the year 2000, just to give you some perspective.

So it's a lot of money being raised. Why is it happening now? What's in the water in 2026? Well, what's happening is that we've reached or maybe even past peak excitement over AI. A lot of real money is being sunk into this technology and a lot of hope is riding on it. I mean, you want to raise as much money as you can when people are willing to pay you a lot of money. for something. And how unusual is it to see so many huge IPOs all in one year?

It's something that we've never seen before. I mean, if you look at SpaceX, Anthropic, and Open AI, assuming all three of those happened this year, plus there are some others, it's going to be a record year in terms of dollars raise. It exceeds anything that we've seen before. Welcome to The Journal, our show about money, business, and power. I'm Jessica Mendoza. It's Monday, June 15th.

Coming up on the show, the great IPO frenzy of 2026. Spotify, it's Jay Shetty. Are you one of those media strategy people? Scrolling through spreadsheets, searching for an audience that pays twice as much attention to your ads than they do on social? Let me introduce you to fans. And they're here with me on Spotify. Trust me, I know fans.

They don't skip. They stay for hours. They don't move on. they manifest. They're not a demographic group. They're fans. Spotify advertising. You're among fans. I just bought 50 shares of SpaceX at 172 per share and I'm never selling. I would not bet against an E-line when it comes to SpaceX. I'm buying $5,000 worth of shares and we're along for the ride. I would put my money in one place and one place owning. That is Elon Musk and the Space X play. This is it.

The hype going into SpaceX's IPO was wild. Investors seemed excited about the vision that founder Elon Musk has for the company, a future that would see AI data centers in orbit and a human colony on Mars. By the end of the day Friday, it seemed clear that that excitement had translated into a successful IPO. In terms of its debut, the IPO did live up to the hype. It is the largest IPO ever. traded up. The company was at various points of the day worth more than $2 trillion. It's, it has moved between being the sixth or seventh most valuable company in the United States,

or seventh or eighth in the world. And so far, it gets an A or an A plus. I mean, the stock traded higher. So the, the good reception for SpaceX bodes well so far for those other AI-related IPOs. Other AI-related IPOs, meaning OpenAI and Anthropic. Like SpaceX, OpenAI and Anthropic have been raising big money from private investors for a while. But they plan to turn on the taps even more by going public as soon as this fall. What's not yet clear is which of the two companies will IPO first? So is this a race to go public?

Why actively compete with one another? It is sort of a race, yeah. Because you want to be the one who kind of strikes while they are in as hot, raises the most amount of money or gets the highest valuation, and therefore you have the largest war chest or the most cheaply acquired war chest. No matter which company goes to market first, it could change the game for the other one. People tend to look at recent examples. If you have a recent example of a company that's done very well and made you a lot of money,

then that sort of adds fuel to the fire. You have a validation that the next thing is going to do well. And then if it winds up doing very poorly, then it could kind of poison the well for those future ones. In other words, if the company that goes first does well, let's call it Company A, it could leave investors feeling confident and set up an even bigger IPO for Company B. But if Company A doesn't do well, it could make it much harder for Company B to make as much money as they want. That's the sort of the basic equation that they're facing. And so that's why they've chosen this moment, really, to do it.

Because it's not because these companies are all profitable. They're not all profitable. It's because the excitement level is very high. You know, you wait two, three years. You say, oh, let's just wait and see how well it does. Well, you know, the moment very well could have passed. At the same time that OpenAI and Anthropic are planning to go public, both companies are also locked in another kind of race.

They both want to have the better AI model to dominate the AI market. it. As excited as people are about AI, the products really have to be good. And they are good. I mean, we all used either chat GPT or Claude or both of them. We've used them and we've kind of been blown away by the things that they can do and how quickly they've advanced too. It's just in a pretty short amount of time. It's like they went from being in kindergarten to being, you know, like sophomores in high school, right? It is pretty cool what they can do, but the products kind of have to sell themselves and the business plans have to sell themselves, and they're kind of flaky business plans. Let's be honest. Flaky, as in developing and building out the infrastructure for AI, costs a lot more than these

companies are currently charging customers for the products, and neither have turned a major profit. When the dust settles, if you're going to believe all the commitments that have been made, trillions of dollars will have been invested in it. That's more than the internet. That's more than railroads. It's more than any other big infrastructure. It's more than the, you know, the Apollo project to reach the moon. We're getting close to it being as much as like, you know, World War II defeating fascism, right? So it's that kind of level of investment. So can these huge companies, you know, SpaceX, Anthropic, Open AI, can they live up to all the hype? Like, can they make a solid profit off of that kind of investment? You know, you're betting on these companies,

growing their sales at a pace that no company has ever done. Is it possible? Of course it. is, you know, things change and this is a new technology. But, you know, the chances of that happening are not a slam dunk by any stretch of the imagination. What these companies are pitching is that these technologies will be incredibly profitable in the long term. Because over time, the tech will get better, and so the cost of running it will go down. And Spencer says a lot of retail investors seem to be buying into that idea. The reason that people are excited about is because they see this. is the next big thing. They read stories about people who bought into the Apple IPO, the Microsoft

IPO in the 1980s, the Amazon IPO in the 1990s. And even though those were pretty rocky, there were ups and downs, there were mostly ups. You know, you got really, really rich eventually if you hung on. And, you know, FOMO is the term for if you're missing out. Of missing the boat. Missing the boat, exactly, just of missing out on some great thing. All the money flowing into these companies have meant that Anthropic and Open AI will likely have valuations around a trillion dollars or more. And Spencer says that could put pressure on an already overhyped market. That's next. This spring, denim gets a softer, lighter update.

Introducing Old Navy's drapey denim wide leg, a new fit that moves with you. It's everything you want denim to feel like for summer. easy, breathable, and effortlessly cool. With a fit that creates natural movement and a wide leg that feels modern, not overwhelming. Plus, that signature, wait, for this price, moment. Old Navy's drapy denim wide leg. SpaceX, and eventually Anthropic and Open AI, will be adding a ton of market cap into the technology space.

And these IPOs are coming at a time when the U.S. stock market is already heavily weighted into tech. The top 10 companies in the SMP 500 are all tech companies, and together they make up nearly 40% of the index's value. And what's also unusual about it is if you look at those 10 companies, all of them have some AI angle to them. Tesla kind of has an AI angle. Apple kind of does. Invidia very much does. Microsoft, Amazon, meta, Alphabet, Broadcom, those companies all have some kind of finger or many fingers in the AI. And so it's never depended so much on, even in the tech bubble, you never had, you know, all the big companies really riding on one thing working.

Concentration can drive huge gains. But historically, it's also come with a lot of risk. You know, let's look at any transformative technology in the past and look at what happened. So any sort of, you know, mania or bubble starts generally with something real. You know, if you look at railroads, if you look at radio, if you look at the internet, all those technologies that had a really transformative effect, they were real. People got very excited about them. There were companies in the stock market that were in those businesses. If you look at the companies that got into it early, only one or two or maybe three

really wound up making a lot of money when all was said and done. For example, there were clear winners and losers of the dot-com era. both Amazon and Pets.com had IPOs, but only one became a successful business. Those past bubbles were much smaller, at least compared to the size of the market now, and they involved a lot less risk for the general public. That's because there were fewer investors back then,

and Americans relied much less on the markets as a foundation for their wealth. Stock wealth has never been a higher share of Americans' net worth, ever. So it affects the way you think about your money and your future spending and your future self in the sense that, you know, you're making plans to the future. You're like, well, I'm going to renovate the house and I'm going to do this or I'm going to do that or I'm going to travel or I'm going to retire a few years earlier. Also, many more people passively invest in the stock market today because retirement accounts like IRAs and 401Ks often hold funds that track major U.S. indexes like the NASDAQ 100, which means more of people. people's retirement funds are also heavily concentrated into tech. That's not great because basically you can sort of be doing a conservative mom and pop kind of thing

and just buying this index fund and kind of setting it and forgetting it. And all of a sudden you have a not insubstantial exposure to these new untested loss-making companies. You know, it used to be much more kind of balanced. You had some banks. You had some oil companies. You had manufacturers, hotels, whatever. the weighting of tech and then of this industry specifically is kind of uncomfortably large right now.

And because of the size of these IPOs, the funds that track major U.S. companies will be forced to buy in at an enormous scale. With all this cash flying around, there are some jitters, too. Just this month, the market reached an all-time high, but it also had its worst day of the year. And that tension has Spencer thinking about an old Wall Street allegory. about a shoe shine boy. There is a famous anecdote that Joe Kennedy, the patriarch of the, you know, the Kennedys, the political family. Those Kennedys.

Those Kennedys, John and Robert and Edward and others' father, he at one point was one of the richest men in America. And famously, he enlarged his fortune during the Depression when lots of people were wiped out or saw their fortunes cut in half or whatever. And so the story goes is that he went to get a shoe shine. and his shoe shine boy was telling him about the stock market and giving him stock tips. He said, you know, this kid, you know, seems to know as much about the stock market as I do,

and he's been right as well. Just like kids on the internet or in chat rooms had been right about a lot of things recently. And he said, you know, either, you know, something's wrong with me or something's wrong with the market. And so he famously sold a lot of his stocks and avoided losing his fortune during the great crash of 1929. The Shushine Boy story is about knowing when to pull out of the market. And it speaks to a question that looms for investors. Are they getting in at the bottom or buying at the top? People have asked me, hey, do you think that this is it?

Is this the sign of the top? I don't know, because there are a lot of false alarms. Any kind of bull market is going to have a lot of false alarms where people say, okay, stick a fork in it, it's done, and they're wrong. They're too early. So, Spencer, do you think this IPO frenzy is an operational? opportunity or a risk? Listen, I'm not a financial advisor, but I write this daily investing newsletter.

But let's just take a step back and look at it this way. They could do well. They can't do very well. And I'll tell you why. It's because they're already so big. So if you look at any of these things in the past that turned into bonanzas, Apple, Microsoft, Netflix, what have you, right? They all were pretty small companies, not widely assumed to be the next.

big thing when they came to market. That's the difference is that you could make a hundred times your money in those. You can't make a hundred times your money in a company that's already worth $1.75 trillion. Yeah, maybe it'll double, right? I mean, that'd be pretty good if it doubled, but there are a lot of other stocks that can double over a number of years just by kind of plotting growth. That doesn't sound that exciting, but that's a much more certain outcome. You know, these companies are spending so much money that, you know, even though AI is real and as a promising technology, you don't know that these companies are going to get really rich off of it. And so this is the moment that they've chosen to pounce. And by some measure,

we might look back at this and say, wow, they really got away with murder because they raised a non-godly amount of money and they weren't even that good. That's all for today, Monday, June 15th. If you want to read more of Spencer's writing, check out his market's AM newsletter. We'll link to it in our show notes. The Journal is a co-production of Spotify and the Wall Street Journal. If you like our show, follow us on Spotify, or wherever you get your podcasts. We're out every weekday afternoon. Thanks for listening. See you tomorrow.