The Keith Edwards Show - Damning Kirk Footage Resurfaces as Widow Scandal Blows Up

Episode Date: September 29, 2025

Become a Member: https://www.youtube.com/@keithedwards/joinSubscribe to my Substack: http://keithedwards.substack.comBuy a Democracy Hat: https://keithsdebateclub.com/products/democracy-hatCall me and ask a question or leave a comment: ‪[phone]‬Follow me on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/thekeithedwardsshow/Follow me on BlueSky: https://bsky.app/profile/keithedwards.bsky.socialFollow me on Threads: https://www.threads.net/@keithedwardsFollow me on Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/keithedwards/Follow me on TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@keithedwardsFollow me on X: http://twitter.com/keithedwards

Multiple clips of Charlie Kirk are currently going viral and they are exposing him. And at the same time, his widow is being called out by members of the far right because of how she's acting. And the really strange, insensitive things she has said about her late husband. It's very, very odd. Let's get into these clips first, though. Charlie Kirk, I've never seen this before. Apparently, this had gone viral before. I've never seen it.

So I'm assuming maybe you have not seen it either. But Charlie Kirk went to Cambridge to debate students. Now, his whole thing was that I'm Charlie Kirk and I'll talk to anyone, but really what he did is he would go to college campuses, debate folks who were unprepared, and then he would post the ones where he came off the best. Unfortunately for him, Cambridge is a completely different animal, and he got owned on multiple fronts. And here is just the first one on gay marriage. So many ancient and recent societies embrace same-sex relationships and even the idea of third genders, well before West. and conservatism even existed. So when you claim that modern conservative values

represent some kind of universal, objective moral truth, like you said on your chair over there, aren't you just defending a selective, historically recent ideology that erases most of human history and targets people who have always been part of it? Can you point to me a great power

that endorsed same-sex marriage? Not cohabitation, but marriage. Ancient Mesopotamia. As marriage. As marriage that existed. Recognized by the state. 100%. How did that work out for them? I've worked out to have perfectly fine. It was an accept of normal society.

Okay. I still think it's wrong. But that is the, that is, like that's the thing. This guy was not really, like a real debater, but it said, oh, I never knew that. It makes me think about that differently. Oh, yeah, that's interesting. I've got to think about that. But no, it's, that is the thing with so many far right individuals is they actually don't care about facts. it's all about feelings. And so he really does expose himself when he goes, well, I still think it's wrong. I still think it's wrong. It's like, okay, you can think it's wrong, but that has

disqualified everything you said previously because you said that because of God and blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, that gay marriage is wrong. But you were trying to use it as you were trying to say because society has existed perfectly before without it, that it's wrong today. And so he is exposing that it's actually more of a recent ideology, Christianity, and things that happen before it prove that it's actually quite normal. I love that. God, I love that. All right. Now, here's Charlie Kirk debating a professor. So why is Ukraine bad? There's a lot wrong with Ukraine. All right. Charlie Kirk debated a Cambridge professor rather than a student for the first time, and he immediately contradicts himself. Take a look. First of all, they're not a democracy.

Zelensky refuses to hold an election. Well, no, he can't hold an election. Oh, wait, did Churchill hold an election during the war? Because under his constitution... Hold on Lincoln held election during the war. That's not true. He can call an election. He can call a snap election. He's full dictator of the country. No. He knows that the people of Ukraine would kick him out immediately because he's deeply unpopular. In fact, if he wanted to show a statement to the world, he would call an election and win by 80% and say, see, I'm super popular. So that's number one. I have a problem with that. I have a problem with a person being propped up as a government we're sending $200 billion to that refuses even to face his voters. Constitutionally, Ukraine is not able to hold an

election because it's under military law at the moment. And that's just a matter of fact. Again, he can, as a prime minister or president, he can do whatever he runs. All right. Did you guys catch how contradictory that argument was? Charlie Kirk says Ukraine is bad, because Zelensky is a dictator, and in order to fix that, Zelensky should override his country's constitution in a dictatorial way. It's like all roads lead to Rome. Zelensky is a dictator if he does. He's a dictator if he does it.

And that plays into the Russian narrative when you have such an incoherent thesis on the entire war. I don't get this approach, which was supposedly to end the war quickly, which now seems to be elongating it. And if people can't see that Putin stalling, And then here's Charlie Kirk getting exposed for spreading far-right misinformation. His suggested budget cuts $1.5 trillion. I wish it should be even more. That is not true. No, it is. It's, okay, you could look it up. $1.5 trillion should be the equivalent of cutting the entire American military budget and a half.

He's advocating for raising taxes on the ultra-wealthy. We'll see if that materializes. That is an income tax. The ultra-wealthy generally did not take a large portion of their income from an income tax and taken instead from capital gains. Well, fundamentally increasing an 8% tax on Elon Musk, who takes a, was it, like, $10,000 as a salary or something stupid, will not make any material difference. This is a straw man argument, and it is obfuscating from the fundamental issue. Let me let me see a government for and run by oligaps. God, I could just watch these all day, but there are many more.

And, yeah, this, Charlie Kirk, the master debater, maybe not so much. Maybe he was just really good at picking weak opponents. Now, Erica Kirk is also getting called out this time by far right Nazi Nekh Fuentes, who unfortunately may be right because Erica Kirk, here's how she's been reacting since her husband was assassinated. We have Sunday specials lined up to the brim because my husband was so intentional about making sure that there was enough content. Always. He made sure we recorded everything. He would not do a speech unless we could get the. the video and the 100%. So we have speeches that no one's heard of. We have interviews that no one's heard of. We have stuff from Korea and Japan that no one's heard of. Podcasts. So I mean, in the words

of my husband, buckle up because there is a lot of content to be had. And we have so many amazing things down the pipeline that we are working on currently that will unveil in due time. I am so excited. Yeah. Yeah. I mean, it's just weird to be, excited about the Charlie Kirk material you have recorded. It's just strange to me in the way that she's like laughing and smile. Like apparently I wasn't the only one. Unfortunately, Nick Fentes agreed.

It's like lady. Didn't your husband just get his face blown off like two seconds ago and not to be insensitive about it? But everyone's thinking it. No one wants to be the asshole. No one wants to say it. Everyone's thinking it. Everyone was thinking it when she gave the first speech. Everyone was definitely thinking it at the moment.

Memorial. Nobody wants to say it because it's inappropriate. It's insensitive. I am the, the troll, right? So I'll be the one to say it. I think it's super inappropriate. I think it's inappropriate. I think it's weird. It's bizarre. Something is off there and I don't like it. But they're doing the Super Bowl commentators with the headsets on doing a media table. They're selling merch, registering voters, they got pyrotechnics. Is this WrestleMania or is this a funeral? Like, what are we doing here? And then the day after the funeral, I'm getting 500 texts and emails.

Erica Kirk here, I miss him. Every time I blink, every beat of my heart, make sure to donate. $5, $15, $25. It's like, okay. Then they're doing a show. Did you see the show today? and so prescient. I said it last night.

I said, I'm getting like a fake vibe. I'm not, something's off there. And people say, well, everybody grieves differently. Yeah, I don't know how much mileage we can get out of that one anymore. Something's not right there. I agree. I mean, I don't want to judge someone's grief, but to me, to me, the combination of, like, I'm so excited about all the content we have of Charlie, which, as we now know, is

all very selectively edited. And the combination of that, when she's raising millions of dollars off of the death of her husband, there's something odd. I'm sorry, there's something odd. And there's something like not right in the situation to me. It's very exploitative. And I would respect her if she like, would have taken time off or, I don't know. I don't need her to like, I don't need her to be visibly emotional for all of us.

I don't need that. But I think the way that she's just kind of pushing through it all is one, not healthy for her. And two, it feels exploitative to me. Well, thanks for watching. If you like this video, please hit like. If you're not subscribed, please consider subscribing. And I'll see you next time. Bye.