The Keith Edwards Show - MAGA Congressman Reads Epstein List On House Floor

Episode Date: February 27, 2026

Become a Member: https://www.youtube.com/@keithedwards/joinSubscribe to my Substack: http://keithedwards.substack.comBuy a Democracy Hat: https://keithsdebateclub.com/products/democracy-hatCall me and ask a question or leave a comment: ‪[phone]‬Follow me on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/thekeithedwardsshow/Follow me on BlueSky: https://bsky.app/profile/keithedwards.bsky.socialFollow me on Threads: https://www.threads.net/@keithedwardsFollow me on Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/keithedwards/Follow me on TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@keithedwardsFollow me on X: http://twitter.com/keithedwardsListen to the show on Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/show/1chmgsT4aUJPmFlyGXIDGN

We have some breaking news of the Epstein files and the Epstein case. A member of Congress has read the Epstein names from the House floor. And this is happening at a time when NPR did that, of course, that really bombshell story. A couple of days ago, we talked about here, if you don't know, just check my page, where they claim and have reporting that Epstein files are missing about a woman who made really disgusting claims against Trump. That's why we have folks now, like Robert Garcia, saying this. A survivor that has made serious accusations and allegations against not just Jeffrey Epstein, but also against President Trump and about abuse that she suffered when she was a minor.

We have seen the DOJ files and the archive manifest that clearly shows that the interviews and information around this survivor have been removed and are missing from the DOJ files. Where are these files? Who remove them? Those questions have to be answered. Well, I think we know the answer to that question. Pam Bondi, Kash Pat Pat Pat Patel, Donald Trump. But this is why it's so important that we win the midterms, because if you want to actually have subpoena power, we actually want to be able to have public hearings. You want to go after people criminally. We've got to start by having actually a little bit of power.

So that's why that's so critical. Now, what the Republicans are doing, they're going after the people who matter. Like Harry Clinton, who has nothing to do with any of this. Now, I wish, I wish. I prayed to anything and anyone that would listen, that they would televise this shit, but they're not doing it.

You're doing it behind closed doors. They are going to tape it, so we'll, I think, get a recording of her deposition, but I wish it was going to be hearing. But they're going to be interrogating Hillary Clinton about Epstein. House Oversight Committee Chairman, James Comer said, we look forward to questioning the Clintons as part of our investigation to horrific crimes of Epstein and Maxwell to deliver transparent accountability for the American people and for survivors. You know who was mentioned? Tens of thousands of times, I believe. one member of Congress said millions of times, Donald Trump, Donald Trump, you know who's not mentioned very much, Hillary Clinton, but whatever, go ahead. My thing is like, you don't want to,

like, listen, Hillary Clinton, Henry Clinton is a verbal assassin. You do not want to get her on camera in a disposition. The only one who's going to come out of that thing unbruised is Hillary Clinton. All right. Now, that is why, though, it is so important. that folks like rep Thomas Massey are doing what they can to get the truth out there. Now, I thought this is interesting. I wanted to let you know. So the reason why Thomas Massey can do this is because members of Congress are protected by the speech or debate clause of the Constitution, which grants them absolute immunity

for anything they say during official legislative business. This allows them to read sealed or classified documents on the House floor without facing their same criminal or civil penalties that would apply to a private citizen. Isn't that amazing? Isn't that amazing? I would do that all the time. If I was a member of Congress, I would talk my shit on the House floor. I would say, whatever, to whoever I want.

But here's Thomas Massey. Reading the names, the DOJ has failed to investigate in the Epstein Files. You're the men that should be investigated. I'll name them right here. Leon Black. You don't even have to see past the redactions to see that this man needs to be investigated. Jess Staley, accused of terrible things. It's right there in the files.

Why is he not being investigated? And Leslie Wexner, why did the FBI list him as a co-conspirator in their own documents in a child sex trafficking case and then tell him, according to him, that they had no questions for him. Why is that? Well, the Epstein Files Transparency Act requires the DOJ and the FBI to disclose to us their internal memos and emails

about how they made those decisions whether to prosecute or not prosecute. Yet they have not delivered those memos. And we still don't have the memos and documents and emails from 2008 to explain why Jeffrey Epstein was given such a light sentence in what would have been an open and shut case of child sex trafficking, which allowed him to go back and recommit these terrible crimes,

create hundreds of more victims, and ensnare so many other people in his conspiracy. Where are those documents that describe those decisions? We need justice. We want the Department of Justice to get to work, and that's what they need to do. That's what they need to do. That's not what they're going to do.

The Justice Department is a wing of Donald Trump's legal defense fund. It's actually insane. I'm really happy that at least one Republican member of Congress is doing the right thing here. And Roe Kana was on Lawrence O'Donnell's show last night, going a little bit more into this. Everything I have just said about these victims in the Epstein files, we know because you got the files. Well, you laid out the stakes very factually and seriously. I mean, people need to understand what happened here. There was someone who has accused the president of the United States of assaulting her at 13.

And she was interviewed by the FBI not once, not twice, not three times, four times. That means obviously the FBI took it very seriously. There is no indication that they think she is mentally unstable. No indication in the notes that there's anything wrong with her. And the FBI chooses to release one of those interviews where Donald Trump is not mentioned, but chooses to cover up and not release three of those interviews. It's insane when you lay it out like that. It's insane when you, I mean, I don't know who.

Who made those decisions? But whoever did, the second we're back in power, the second we have a Democratic president, we need to go after every single person breaking the law in defending these pedophiles. And it's only Roger Sellenberg's excellent reporting that uncovers that they actually produced these four interviews to Maxwell, but they have not produced them to the American people. It is a huge cover up. So, and by the way, it's such impressive reporting, the kind of associations you have to do with all these pages, putting them together to figure out exactly what happened here. And then Carson Garcia goes over and takes a look at the files and confirms what everyone thinks is going on here.

So this is a violation of law that they're not releasing these files. These files clearly involve Donald Trump. And going forward, is there anything possible to extract this information from, you know, possible to extract this information from. this Bondi Justice Department. Yes, there's the legal route. As you remember, Thomas Massey and I asked for a special master for this very reason. And the judge did not say that that was unreasonable. He just said, you need to file a lawsuit or survivors need to follow a lawsuit.

So there is the Southern District of New York possibility. There's a possibility that Thomas and I are talking to in Congress to build a bipartisan coalition to say, look, it's not just these three interviews that concerned Donald Trump. There has been now reporting that 90 survivor statements have not been released just by a review of these files. And we're not even talking about the redactions. They just have not produced these things. But for viewers who have been watching your show and who know that you were instrumental... Sorry, I mean, we'll keep watching, but it is crazy.

It is crazy. This is the biggest cover-up in American history happening right now. It's like if it's like if Watergate happened in public on the internet. This is just a blatant disregard for the law. And honestly, what this says to me is they don't respect you at all. They think you're stupid. They think you're not going to care. They think that if they just give you a little bit of slop, you'll move on with your life, you'll watch the newest thing on Netflix, and you'll stop paying attention. Are you going to stop paying attention? I'm not. The more they hide, the more I want to see what it is they're hiding. That's how I feel. Also, I'm telling you, we got to put these people in jail.

in all this by introducing me to Bradley Edwards, making sure that we got the survivors. For those who went following it. Introducing you on TV. On TV. I was coming into the studio and someone, one of your co-other anchors at MSNBC didn't know the whole story. I said, no, that's how we got all the survivors. That's how we got the public pressure to get this out. But they should know that you basically have three interview memorandum with someone who's accusing the president of the United States and those aren't produced.

I mean, put aside what you think of the claims. Why are they hiding it? If there's nothing to it, why aren't they producing it? And with all of this outrage, why aren't they producing it today? This should be the central issue for anyone who cares about this case. Produce the three other witness interviews with this accuser and tell us why you're covering that up. I would love for someone on the right to explain that to me. Explain it to me.

It doesn't make sense. None of it makes sense. I guess it only makes sense if you think about why they'd want to do that. And that's because, I don't know, perhaps there's some truth to all of it. Perhaps they're trying to protect the president. It feels as though they're in quicksand, though. And the more they struggle, the faster down they go. All right, well, hit like on the video.

Please do subscribe. I'm going to start saying that more because I want to actually get us to crazy to say, two million subscribers by the end of the next year. Subscribers are a stupid metric because millions of you watch me, and you're not subscribing, that's fine. But subscriber count does matter to the media, and it matters to validators because they don't understand that subscriber counts are actually like a lagging indicator.

So I hate all that stuff. I hate the metric stuff. I hate asking for likes and subscribes, but it does help. And if we can get to a, you know, the bigger number we get, the more seriously people take us and the things that we do here are, have a bigger impact. So that's why I think it's going to be important. So look out for more of that too. Okay.

And don't hate me for doing it. Don't hate me. It's just for the cause. It's for the cause. Okay. I'll see you soon. Bye.