The Keith Edwards Show - WTF?! Karoline Leavitt’s New Face Has Internet Screaming
Episode Date: September 7, 2025Keith Edwards discusses Karoline Leavitt’s viral photo debuting a dramatically altered look, fueling plastic surgery rumors and comparisons to the overdone “Mar-a-Lago face.” He also breaks down... Rand Paul’s sharp pushback against JD Vance over a U.S. strike, warning it sets a dangerous precedent of state-sanctioned executions.Become a Member: https://www.youtube.com/@keithedwards/joinSubscribe to my Substack: http://keithedwards.substack.comBuy a Democracy Hat: https://keithsdebateclub.com/products/democracy-hatCall me and ask a question or leave a comment: (202) 810-4379Follow me on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/thekeithedwardsshow/Follow me on BlueSky: https://bsky.app/profile/keithedwards.bsky.socialFollow me on Threads: https://www.threads.net/@keithedwardsFollow me on Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/keithedwards/Follow me on TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@keithedwardsFollow me on X: http://twitter.com/keithedwards
Transcript
Discussion (0)
Well, we got some news from you. One, Caroline Leavitt has, she has debuted a new face and the internet is going a stir over it. And we also have, Rand Paul has attacked J.D. Vance online. And this is a continuation of his attacks on the Venezuelan boat that they are saying is a drug cartel that was crossing the ocean ordered to get to us. And they thought it was very important that the U.S. government killed 11 people.
any due process. Let's get to that first and I will show you Caroline Levitt's new look
and internet's reaction. First, Rand Paul said this about why it's so important that we, I don't know,
have due process. The fact that U.S. officials describe the individuals killed by the U.S.
strike as narco-terrorists does not transform them into lawful military targets. The U.S. is not
engaged in an armed conflict with Venezuela or Trenda-Ragua. The strike runs afoul to the right to life
under international human rights law.
So the president basically said that these guys are terrorists.
You can kill terrorists.
You can't, I guess, kill drug dealers just for dealing drugs, right?
Well, this is, you know, brings up a question.
So, you know, we all assume these people were bad people and drug dealers.
But if they were caught off the coast of Miami, we would stop the boat if they don't shoot at us.
We don't shoot at them.
They're confiscated.
They're put in jail.
Then they go through a trial to prove what they were doing.
If they have 20 pounds of cocaine or heroin or something on the boat, they'll be convicted.
The reason we have trials, though, and we don't automatically assume guilt is, what if we make a mistake?
And they happen to be people fleeing Venezuela, the Venezuelan dictator.
I think probably that, you know, we had the facts correct.
I got bad people here.
But that's the reason, like, off our coast, it isn't our policy just to blow people up.
We don't blow up ships entering our waters unless they're, you know, hell-bent on attacking.
another ship or unless they are resisting with gunfire, we arrest people. So it is difficult and it's
hard because obviously they're bad people. So they're like they want something bad to happen
them. But typically even the worst people in our country, if we accuse somebody of a terrible
crime, they still get a trial basically. They get a lawyer, they get their dang court.
But if we're at war, you know, what we blow up bad guys all the time. I think. But we're an
at war. Someone tell me when Congress has declared war with people,
in little boats traveling over the ocean.
When did we declare a war against that?
I don't believe we did.
Now, I agree.
I don't think drug cartels,
if they make it to our shores,
we should properly handle them.
But this is not the way.
Let's keep going.
That's what they're saying.
This is a war.
And we do have, I mean, obviously,
you know the numbers of how many people in this country
die from illicit drugs that come in from Central and South America.
A lot of them have fentanyl and other very dangerous ingredients in them.
I mean, people drop dead all the time.
And they kill 100,000 people a year on a bad year, 100,000 Americans dying.
That does kind of feel like a war.
But it's also why in our country, war is the exception.
So when we have a war, it was intended that we would declare war, be a big vote of our Congress.
And then at that point in time, we say if that enemy, if we are at war, let's say with Venezuela,
then we say their ships are, you know, free to shoot them anywhere they are anytime.
And so we kill them off their coast.
We kill them in their country.
but we've declared war on them.
It's a little harder here because this is a crime
and this is a criminal syndicate.
So look, once again, no love lost for the people
who died that are trying to...
If they are who they say they are,
now I don't trust the Trump administration.
Rand Paul is going pretty far outside of MAGA
to be alleging this and to be saying that,
hey, we should put the brakes on this sort of stuff.
But to me, it's a wider question
of are these folks even who they say they were?
Now, J.D. Vance was actually disgusting,
and this is where he got clapped up by, what's his name, by Rand Paul.
So J.D. Vance said this.
J.D. Vand said,
killing cartel members who poison our fellow citizens is the highest and best use of our military.
Democrats, let's send your kids to die in Russia, Republicans,
let's actually protect our people from the scum of the earth.
Oh, my God.
And then Brian Krasenstein said, killing the citizens of another nation who are civilians without any due process is called a war crime.
Fact.
That is a fact.
That is a fact.
J.D. Vance said, I don't give a shit what you call it.
What a piece of shit.
What a piece of shit.
I don't give a shit what you call it.
Yet we are so past Rubicon and this sort of stuff.
But we really are supposed to have due process.
We're not just supposed to kill whoever we want, whatever we want.
Well, Rand Paul said it even better than I didn't.
I cannot believe I'm agreeing with Rand Paul.
And he said this.
He said,
JD, I don't give a shit.
Vance.
It's already kind of slapping him.
I hate to say it.
He says,
killing people he accuses of a crime is the highest and best use of the military.
Did he ever read to kill a mockingbird?
Did he ever wonder what might happen if the accused were immediately executed without a trial or representation?
What a despicable?
and thoughtless sentiment, it is to glorify killing someone without a trial.
God damn it.
I hate this timeline.
I'm agreeing with Rand Paul.
But it's true.
And it is true that J.D. Vance is a piece of shit.
Rand Paul didn't say that, but I did.
J.D. Vance, you're a piece of shit.
All right, let's keep going.
So there's, uh, there is an, there is an epidemic in the country called Mar-a-Lago face.
My God, you're greasy.
You or somebody you love might suffer.
So it is very important to know the symptoms of Mara Lago Face.
It involves filler, it involves a stretching of the skin, it involves an enlarging of the lips and the thickening of makeup, whether you're a male or female.
And there have been many casualties to Mara Lago Face.
Here's more of the symptoms.
No one's really talking about it, but the plastic surgery face is taking over Mar-a-Lago.
Open the news, and you'll see.
These billionaires are all starting to have the same taste in women.
Donald Trump Jr., ex-fiance Kimberly Guilfoyle, Eric Trump's wife, Lara Trump,
Jeff Bezos's fiancée Lauren Sanchez.
They're all starting to look eerily alike.
Sunkin eyes, lifted brows, full lips, sharp jawlines, heavy contour and muddy tones,
and those blindingly white veneers, it's a lot to take in.
Lately, this look seems to be the go-to for rich guys at Maralago.
preference is slowly shaping mainstream beauty standards too people online keep pointing it out like if all
these billionaire wives have that same face is that what high society beauty is supposed to look like now
maybe no it's just because Donald trump has terrible taste and he likes gaudy over the top things and so he
enjoys women who are gaudy and over the top in their physical attributes and uh uh uh uh
early Mar-a-Lago face. Now, Caroline Levitt used to look like this. She used to like that. Not,
you know, very beautiful woman, very beautiful woman. I'll say that. Ugliest, ugliest sin for what she
believes. Pretty woman. That was your nexter neighbor. You'd say, oh, that's a, she's a cute girl.
Okay. Here she is now.
Here she is now. The Mar-a-Lago makeover is complete. We've got the
thick lips, the clown makeup, and something very, very odd happening with the eye here.
I think it's a photoshop correction gone wrong.
The internet exploded over this.
Someone alleged that this is what she looks like.
I think this person actually looks better.
Someone, well, you'll see.
It's, again, this is the moral...
This is what women in conservative spaces want to look like.
Someone else says, what the F is wrong with your eye?
And of course, there's just so many of these.
So many of these.
I do think it's sad.
I think it's sad that women feel that they have to do this to themselves
in order to get power in conservative spaces.
I think it's a sad thing.
But it's also a sign.
of the evil in my opinion evil has a way of going from the inside to the outside it
seeps into the skin and first of all yikes yeah someone else said well I know that
man installed a spray tan booth in the Oval Office perhaps perhaps I hope you can
see all those tweets I was showing because I'm at a different setup and I just
realize you couldn't see that one so hopefully you could see them regardless that's all i got if you
like this video please hit like in the video if you're not subscribe please consider subscribing
sorry for the different setup we are traveling but um still want to bring you commentary and
hopefully you don't mind um i'm in new york so i will be here for a few days and i'm going to
do a panel on wednesday interestingly enough um so i don't know if that'll be live stream but if it is
i will figure out wait for you to see it and um i'll see you
you next time.
