The Koerner Office - Business Ideas and Deep Dives with Chris Koerner - Which AI Should You Use to Make Money? GPT 5 vs Others⏐ Ep. #207

Episode Date: August 11, 2025

Check out my newsletter at ⁠⁠⁠⁠TKOPOD.com⁠⁠⁠⁠ and join my new community at ⁠⁠⁠⁠TKOwners.com⁠⁠⁠⁠.Disclaimer: This content is for educational and entertainment pur...poses only and does not constitute financial advice. Always do your own research and consult with a licensed financial professional before making any investment decisions.In this episode I put ChatGPT 5, Claude Opus 4.1, Grok 4 and Gemini 2.5 Pro head to head to see which AI can create the fastest, most practical money making plan from scratch. I gave each model the exact same challenge to become a $100 per hour consultant in 72 hours starting with no audience, no connections, and just $500, and then I compared their strategies step by step.After ranking their ideas for quality, simplicity, and likelihood to work, I pushed the competition further by testing each AI in a real money options trading experiment. I followed their instructions live, invested my own cash, and revealed the exact results the next day including profit, losses, and all. This was a full stress test of speed, accuracy, and real world outcomes, and the results may surprise you.Enjoy!---Watch this on YouTube instead here: ⁠⁠⁠⁠tkopod.co/p-yt⁠⁠⁠⁠Ask me a question on or off the show here: ⁠⁠⁠⁠http://tkopod.co/p-ask⁠⁠⁠⁠Learn more about me: ⁠⁠⁠⁠http://tkopod.co/p-cjk⁠⁠⁠⁠Learn about my company: ⁠⁠⁠⁠http://tkopod.co/p-cof⁠⁠⁠⁠Follow me on Twitter here: ⁠⁠⁠⁠http://tkopod.co/p-x⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Free weekly business ideas newsletter: ⁠⁠⁠⁠http://tkopod.co/p-nl⁠⁠⁠⁠Share this podcast: ⁠⁠⁠⁠http://tkopod.co/p-all⁠⁠⁠⁠Scrape small business data: ⁠⁠⁠⁠http://tkopod.co/p-os⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠---

Transcript
Discussion (0)
Starting point is 00:00:00 made me $400 profit over the course of about two business hours. Not bad, not bad. I don't like Gemini. You're just not cool, Gemini. If it weren't for you, I would have made a 60% day-over-day return. Thank you, Grock, for I like you now. Plog wants me to start doing outreach on day one, which I love. These are four credibility shortcuts that it gave me that I really, really like.
Starting point is 00:00:21 Chat, GPT5 just came out and it is already blowing minds, but is it better than Gemini, Claude, Grock. And can it make me more money than any of the other ones? Can it make you more money than any of the other ones? Today, I find out. I take three different money-making prompts and pit them against all of the competing AI companies out there. I will actually invest my hard-earned money, live on camera, and then revisit it to see which
Starting point is 00:00:45 one made or lost me the most money. And then we find out which one is best. Is chat GP-5 best for making money? You're about to find out. Okay, here is the prompt. You are an expert in rapid business creation and online research. My goal. Become a $100 an hour consultant in the next 72 hours in the field I currently have.
Starting point is 00:01:01 have no experience in. Then it has a bunch of rules. I'll put them up on the screens. You can read them. I don't want to read them all. It must be fully legal. I'm starting from scratch. I don't have an audience. I don't have rich family or friends. I have 500 bucks and I can work 12 hours per day for the next three days. And I also asked it to ask me questions. This is a very important key. Ask it to ask you the right questions that it needs to get the most context that it needs to give you the best output. Outside from deep research on chat, GPD, it's not ever going to ask you questions, not any of these models. So this says ask me 10 targeted questions. I'm just going to do five because we don't want to take too much time. Think like a war general planning a speed run to $100 an hour
Starting point is 00:01:39 consulting status, be specific, tactical, and leave no steps vague or generic. All right, now I'm going to copy this prompt. I'm going to open a new chat window. You can see I'm using GPT5. I'm going to paste it. I am going to change this to five questions. Okay. Boom. It's going to get to work. Let's go to Claude Opus 4.1. Same prompt. Same prompt. Boom. Let's go to Grock.
Starting point is 00:02:04 Four. Same prompt. Boom. Gemini 2.5 Pro. Boom. Let's see which is fastest. Chad GPD is already asking me questions. Claude is already asking me questions.
Starting point is 00:02:17 Grock asked me questions. Google Gemini. Still thinking, oh, Gemini, come on, Grandma. All right, let's go to Chad, GPD. Here are my five targeted questions. DNA. What are your fastest learning skills? Okay, here's the questions that asked me. What are my fastest learning skills? And I said, I can identify monetization opportunities and I'm willing to execute on business ideas ASAP. Number two, what's your comfort zone? Do you want to do remote or is in person
Starting point is 00:02:42 okay? Either or. Industry boundaries. What industry should I avoid? I said anything illicit. Number four, proof of assets. Do you have any borrowable credibility I can lean on? I wanted this to be as bare bones as possible. So no credibility. Number five, delivery preference. We'd rather sell advice strategy, offer a mix of strategy and advice, or sell fast results in a very specific. And I said, anything that lets me use judge 55 in the best way. Number six, sales energy, are you comfortable with aggressive outreach, cold EMs, loom videos, phone calls, and you prefer software inbound style? Yes, I am. I'm comfortable with it.
Starting point is 00:03:14 All right, there's my answer. Let's see what Claude asked me. What is your current comfort level with technology? One to 10. I'll say seven and yes. Two. Oh, it also asked me, am I good at writing? And do I have experience with AI tools?
Starting point is 00:03:29 Yes, decent at writing. Yes, experience with AI. What industries have I worked in before? I'm going to treat this like I'm 18 years old again. So food service, pest control. Keep it simple. What do people ask you for help with? Business advice.
Starting point is 00:03:44 What topics can you talk for 30 minutes without reparation? Business. Three, learning style. What's an example of something complex you've quickly learned in the past? How did you approach it? Let's see. coding. Better at learning through videos, reading, hands on practice. Visual learner. How comfortable are you with learning while doing? Very comfortable. Market access and geography. What city region are you in?
Starting point is 00:04:09 DFW. No LinkedIn connections. I'm going to lie to it so it doesn't lead on that. What's your age range general appearance? 38 male, 6 foot 3 inches. Lots of Riz. Risk tolerance. Are you comfortable with cold outreach? Yes. No illicit industries. Willing to work for free? Done. All right. What does GROC want to know? These questions from GROC are like a lot more broad. There's no list. There's no bullet points. Any hard constraints. I'll just say nothing. Illicit. I live in DFT. Very fast learner. Work with anyone. have I ever sold anything online or offline? Never sold anything. What additional research do you have beyond the 500? Decent at door to door. All right, Gemini, what does Gemini want to know? Gemini is just asking me if it's okay to do deep research to do this stuff. So I don't know.
Starting point is 00:05:08 Why are you waiting on me, dude? Okay, so Gemini is still working. Gemini basically spent a bunch of time to say, Chris, do you mind if I do deep research? It's like, dude, bro, go. All right. Grock's still cooking. Claude is done. Chad GPD is done. Go back to Chad GPD.T. It says that I'm good at spotting monetization. I told it all this stuff. If that's correct, I can move forward and pick the exact niche. You can intercalde-cultz build a crash course skill plan, create authority shortcuts, not the client acquisition sequence, give you the hour by hour playbook. Is that alignment correct? Yes. Chad GapD is searching the web. All right. Claude, here is your Intel profile, strong tech adaptability, yadda, yet. It's basically just regurgitating what I already told it.
Starting point is 00:05:49 kind of like ChatGBTGPT did. So Claude and Chat Chabit are treating this very similarly, and they basically just laid out the plan. Here's what I understand about you according to how you answered me. Are you ready for the Folster Shoe plan? Yes. In Gemini's defense, it kind of did the same thing, but it did that too early in the process. All right.
Starting point is 00:06:08 Now, Grock is saying, here's a summary of your answers. Grock is just getting going. It's selected digital marketing, consulting, specializing, and paid ads for local service businesses. Okay. Why this niche. Taylor to your situation, high demand, low barriers to entry, realistic for 72 hours, ethical legal fit, skill crash course. You will learn minimum viable skills, setting up running basic Facebook, Google ad campaigns, yada, yeah, yeah. Exact 12 to 24 hour learning plan. You're going to use free, cheap resources, you're going to practice tasks. You're going to proof building steps. You're going to build authority. Client acquisition plan.
Starting point is 00:06:45 build a target list with Google Maps, do door to door. It has a script, quick win for more leads at business name follow up. All right. I see in up sales. Initial offer $100 an hour for ad setup optimization, delivers measurable leads, Google certified. All right, this is an hour by hour execution checklist. Let's see.
Starting point is 00:07:05 This is GROC 4. Day one, learning and setup, Google Skills Shop certification, Facebook Blueprint courses, break, YouTube tutorial, set up. So it's given me 12 hours a day. Day two, more learning plus authority plus initial outreach. Day three, outreach blitz plus close, door to door, send follow up, break, track progress into Google sheet. If no client by hour 70, extend research, reshoot shows 200 touches, yield one to two wins.
Starting point is 00:07:30 Stay tactical adapt as needed. You've got this fast learner advantage. All right. I kind of like that. Let's see what Claude says. Your niche, AI implementation consultant for local service businesses. Okay. DFW has 50,000 service businesses.
Starting point is 00:07:44 they'll pay $100 an hour to someone who speaks their language. All right. Now, I like this. It's showing me all of its sources embedded in the response, as Claude likes to do. We're also going to measure the word count here. Okay. My positioning is the AI guy who speaks contractor. This niche crushes because home services are on the leading edge of adoption of AI.
Starting point is 00:08:06 Probably one of the hottest industries in the world right now. Your pest control background equals instant credibility, $100 an hour justification. They're already paying $1 to $200 an hour for basic business consultants. Okay, I don't know who's doing that in local home service businesses. All right, hour by hour, day one, skill acquisition blitz. Hours 1 through 3 core AI tools mastery. Sign up for free trials. Zapier, make voice flow or bot press, which are chatbot builders, and cal.com, which is AI scheduling.
Starting point is 00:08:35 Watch YouTube craft courses. Hours 4 through 6. Industry-specific learning, service Titan, house call pro, Facebook groups for HVAC business owners, hours seven through nine, build your demo arsenal. Great, demos using free tools. Hours 10 through 12, authority building script. It seems like create simple website on card.com. How did I know that I use card? Maybe it's just a coincidence. Three case studies, right through case studies, fictional but realistic, set up my Google my business profile as AI consultant. Day two, market penetration. What I like about Claude is it's more accelerated. Now, it is a different
Starting point is 00:09:09 niche entirely. We're not apples to apples, but I feel like this plan is going to get me to money faster. Market penetration on day two, digital outreach, free value bomb strategic partnerships, day three, close the deals. On Grok, GROC doesn't have me even doing outreach until day three. Okay, it has a cold approach script. Pricing strategy, starter package, 500 transformation package 2000, monthly retainer, 1,000 a month. Credibility shortcuts, the beta tester play. These are four credibility shortcuts that it gave me that I really, really like. The beta tester play is offer three businesses free setup in exchange for video testimonials. Number two, the association angle.
Starting point is 00:09:48 Offer to speak at local PHCC, plumbing, heating, cooling contractors meeting about AI. Number three, the case study hack, document everything, even free work as case studies. Number four, the partner power move. Partner with one established contractor as your showcase client. Red flags to avoid. Don't overpromise. Don't talk tech. Talk time and money saved.
Starting point is 00:10:08 I like it. Don't chase residential contractors initially. Don't negotiate hourly rate package deals. This is good. And success metrics, day one is only complete when three working demos are created. Website is live. 10 plus contractor connections made. So Claude wants me to start doing outreach on day one, which I love.
Starting point is 00:10:27 Day two is complete when 30 plus outreach messages sent 10 plus businesses engaged, five plus demos scheduled. Okay. Day three is complete when three demos delivered, first paying client secured and pipeline of 10 plus prospects. The multiplier effect, once you land your first client, refer a request success story, upsell immediately, industry penetration. Your mantra is I help contractors work on their business, not in their business. Ready to execute, the clock starts now. DFW contractors are losing money every hour.
Starting point is 00:10:59 They don't have AI. You are their $100 hour release solution. I love this. Okay, I'm not to the grading yet. but I just love this. This is so good. All right, let's do chat GPT last. Let's see what Gemini's come up with.
Starting point is 00:11:11 Okay, it's researching a lot. 24 different sites. I see Reddit in there a bunch, Upwork. Gemini is still cooking. So hopefully the time it's taking is proportional to how good it is. Okay, Chad GPT, here we go. The niche Chad GPT recommends for me is create and sell custom GPTs, mini chat GPTs for small local businesses.
Starting point is 00:11:32 Oh my gosh. My last video was about doing this. My last video called eight best chat GPT tools to make money with ranked. That was my number one opportunity. Okay, but trying to remember if I had talked to chat GPT about that, if it's just a coincidence or not. I don't even remember. So very interesting because so far all three of these models want me to do three different,
Starting point is 00:11:52 but somewhat similar things. Ads agency for local home service businesses, AI implementation for local businesses, and now create and sell custom GPs for small local businesses, like realtors, therapists, coffee shops and locals. I don't know what coffee shop needs their own GPT. Maybe in the future that'll be a thing. But I feel like that's like saying 15 years ago, every copy shop is going to have their own app. The app store is the next big thing.
Starting point is 00:12:19 Every small business needs their own app. People were saying that. I remember it. It's not true. They don't. Most don't. Now every business needs a website. Will custom small business GPTs go the way of the app or the website to be determined?
Starting point is 00:12:32 I don't think it's necessary. Maybe it is. I don't know. If a coffee shop could use a chatbot on their website to answer simple questions like, what are your operating hours? Maybe any business that needs a chatbot could use its own GPT so the chatbot can use the data in the GPT. I don't know. I'm conflicted on that. Tell me in the comments what you think. All right. So GPTs hit 3 million published by January 2024. Small biz demand is soaring. So it is sourcing. I don't like what it's sourcing. Wikipedia, Business Insider. I don't like those sources. But It says you're selling, I'll launch a custom AI assistant for your business in 72 hours.
Starting point is 00:13:09 All right, here's my skills crash course. Okay, here's what I like about this. It links to the exact sources that I need to use to do this stuff. It says, watch this video called starting a consulting business, study prompt guides, and it has all these links in here. Create three demo GPs, fast authority build, client acquisition. Okay, I like how it gave me a template for outreach. But, okay, is Gemini, Gemini, are you even done?
Starting point is 00:13:34 Because I'm going to a wedding reception here soon. You got to hurry. All right, Gemini's done. We'll get back to chat at GPT, but honestly, I'm a little letdown. Gemini says, the 72-hour consultant, a tactical blueprint for rapid business creation. That's like the most AI generated sentence I've ever read. I'm such a hater on Gemini. I need to stop this.
Starting point is 00:13:52 It's my bias is showing. By the way, like, I don't have any, like, I don't have any affiliate links. I'm not sponsored by any of these. It's just fun. This Gemini thing, honestly. it's not ADHD friendly. It's losing me. It's reading like a white paper written by a Stanford PhD. Part one, strategic briefing, part two, mission blueprint, the 72 hour assault on 100 hour consulting. Wow, there's a lot here. All right, here's one thing I like about this. It definitely buried the
Starting point is 00:14:19 lead here. I had to scroll and zoom in and look and just to find what it chose for me. What is my idea? What am I doing? And it says the no code automation and productivity consultant for service base SMBs. That is a mouthful. No code automation. Okay, so like an AI implementation and or automation agency and or consultant. Okay, here's what I like about this. The Trojan horse entry strategy.
Starting point is 00:14:47 A major obstacle in consulting is the long sales cycle associated with large complex projects. Proposing a full scale operational overhaul to a new client is a high friction approach destined for failure within a 72 hour window. So the strategy here is to use a small, high-impact project as a Trojan horse. The initial offer will focus on solving one specific, highly painful and easily automated task for the client. This could be something as simple as automating the transfer of leads from a website,
Starting point is 00:15:15 form to a CRM or spreadsheet. This low-risk, quick-win project gets a consultant inside the walls. Once value's been, okay, I call it foot in the door. Gemini calls it Trojan horse. I like it. That's a good idea. rapid armament crash course. Okay, this is not written at a fifth grade reading level.
Starting point is 00:15:32 Use Zapier and Air Table. Very, very detailed curriculum. Upwork Blitz. It's very, very specific on how to make an Upwork profile and how to target it. So you get customers. This is Upwork is a marketplace of active buyers. I like that it's taking this approach. Do not use the title Zapier developer.
Starting point is 00:15:50 Use a value-oriented title like Productivity Consultant. I automate repetitive tasks for service-based business. businesses, the first two lines are critical, lead with the pain points. This is really good. Channel 2, LinkedIn surgical strike, channel three, community and forum reconnaissance, section 5, pricing and packaging. Okay, it's pretty good. It's hard to read for a simple-minded man such as myself, but here's what I'm going to do. I'm going to go to wordcounter.net, and I'm going to see how many words these all are. All right. Number of words for Gemini, 4531. Number of words. for Chad GBT.
Starting point is 00:16:30 625. Wow. Okay. Now, more does not always equal better, but Chad GBT was very, very light. Let's go to GROC. 1821 for GROC. Last but not at least,
Starting point is 00:16:44 Claude Opus 4.1. I really like this one. 1409. Okay. More does not always equal better, but I'm going to call it quality density. Which one had the most dense quality.
Starting point is 00:16:59 All right, I'm going to judge these by overall, which is just like a gut feel, and then density of quality, how many words, how likely is it to work, and then I'm going to add up all those, you know, zero through five grades,
Starting point is 00:17:16 highest grade lens. So chat GPT5, its idea was to be a 72-hour, create-and-sell custom GPTs. I don't know. I think we're early. I don't know if a coffee shop needs a GPT. I don't know if they would pay for that.
Starting point is 00:17:32 If they need it, I don't think you're going to convince them that they need it. So overall, I'm going to give it a two out of five on that. Quality density. Yeah, it's pretty dense, but there's not a lot there. Actually, let's just do quality and quantity. So obviously, Gemini is going to be a five on quantity, grok a four, clawed a four, and then chat GPT is a two. quality. Chad GPD is a three. Gemini is a four. Opus four. Grock three. How likely are these to work?
Starting point is 00:18:07 Chad GPD, I'm going to say two. Gemini 2.5. I think being a no code automation expert, automation agency owner consultant is is a great thing to do. I think it's a four out of five most likely to work. Claude's idea was AI automation consultant for local service businesses, which is kind of the same thing as what Gemini told me. So it's going to get a four as well. And then GROC told me to be a digital consultant for paid ads. I think that is three likely to work.
Starting point is 00:18:42 I actually think the learning curve is much greater there. There's more to learn. You can learn faster with AI. And I think you're a lot more crowded in that space. Okay, final tally in fourth place is this shocks me, Chad GPD 5. 625 words, do better. The quality, three out of five. Quantity, two out of five.
Starting point is 00:19:02 The idea most likely to work, two out of five. Simplicity, four out of five. It was simple for me to read and understand. Maybe that's because Chad GPD knows me the best and knows that that's how I like my answers. Third place, third out of four, with a score of 13 out of 15 is Grock 4. 1821 words, three out of five on quality. That's the quality of the idea, the quality of how explains the idea to me.
Starting point is 00:19:26 Quantity, four out of five, it's a lot of words, 1800, most likely to work. Three out of five, digital marketing consultants, which is hard. Simplicity, three out of five, it explained it in a decently simple way. Total grade 13 out of 15. And second place, I hate to admit this, Gemini 2.5 Pro, it took a long time. it asked me one extra follow-up question, but the output it gave me was insane. 4,5-131 words, 4 out of 5 on quality, 5 out of 5 on quantity. Most likely to work, 4 out of 5.
Starting point is 00:20:00 I like that idea a lot. 2 out of 5 on simplicity. It read like a white paper. 15 out of 20. I got those grades wrong. These are out of 20. So Chajibati 5 was 11 out of 20, Grock 4, 13 out of 20. Gemini 2.5, 15 out of 20.
Starting point is 00:20:15 And then Claude Opus 4.1. I'm not really surprised that it won because I'm loving Claude Moore and more here lately. 1400 words. Four out of five on quality, four out of five on quantity, most likely to work four out of five. Four out of five on simplicity. 16 out of 20 total overall score. All right. Let's give ChadjupD5 one more chance to redeem itself.
Starting point is 00:20:35 This will not be a battle of the models. We're going to ask Chadabit 5 one more similar question. You are my tactical operator for fast legal moneymaking. goal make $10,000 net in seven days starting with $200 in a laptop constraints no audience no rich friends no existing business no illegal or shady tactics follow platform terms of service budget is hard capped at 200 deliver three to five money paths give me a day by day plan unit economics yada yada yada all right let's see how chat chad jpdb5 responds to this prompt okay what i love about this response is it's extremely fast i also kind of hate
Starting point is 00:21:14 it. I'm not going to lie, because part of me is worried that Chad GPT5 is just a ploy by open AI to save money. They don't want to use it in a more expensive model for them when it's not needed, right? It's kind of like taking your Lamborghini to the grocery store. You don't need it for that. You take your minivan to the grocery store. All right. Let's see what Chad GPTGPT five money paths to start today, flip high value stuff, rapid freelance, local service like declutter or cleanup gigs, affiliate promotion, pet sitting or dog walking. I, Okay, so it's telling me to flip stuff on Craigslist, Facebook Marketplace, et cetera. Not super detailed.
Starting point is 00:21:50 Kind of telling me what I was afraid of. In closing, Claude is the bomb. Claude's the bomb. I mean, look at this result. It gave me. It linked to everything. It did a ton of research. It's very specific, short bullet points, easy to read, easy to understand, easy on the eyes
Starting point is 00:22:05 just to look at this stuff. It's a very valid idea. It gets me selling on day one, which I always promote. It's a shame Claude wouldn't. answer the question for me on options trading so we couldn't include Claude in that. But I would say across all of these challenges, Claude Opus 4.1 is the real winner. It's not ChatchapD5. I'm a little disappointed. Once again, I think it was just using like 40 or 4.1 on the back end do that research for me. There was no deep research happening. There was no agent. There was no 03. It didn't take nearly
Starting point is 00:22:38 long enough for it to use 03. This might put Claude as is my number one. Worth 20 bucks a month for sure. I think Google Gemini is too academic for my liking. Okay, I've seen a lot of gurus on Twitter talking about using Chad GPT and all these AI tools to trade stocks for you, trade options for you. Well, you're in luck because I don't know anything about trading options. I own some stocks. I buy them every now and then. My plan is buy something I believe in and never sell it. I know nothing about options, puts, calls, all that. I don't know. I'm an idiot. So here's exactly what I'm going to do. I'm going to take the three best AI models out today. Gemini Pro 2.5, chat GPT5, which came out two hours ago, and GROC 4, which came out about a month ago.
Starting point is 00:23:20 I would love to use Claude Opus 4.1, but it does not look at real-time data. It's knowledge set expired back in February 2025. So we're only doing three today. And I'm going to ask all three of them the same prompt, and I'm going to put up to $2,000 in this to see which one does the best. Now, here's exactly what my prompt is. You are an expert options trader. The time is 2 o'clock. Look at my watch.
Starting point is 00:23:43 220 central standard time, all right? And the U.S. stock market closes an hour. I have up to 500. I'm going to change that to 700. To spend on one options trade that expires tomorrow, recommend the single best call or put option that I can buy right now and hold overnight. Use only liquid tickers like SPY, QQQQ, Apple, or Tesla. The options ask price must be $5 or less, so I don't spend more than $500.
Starting point is 00:24:07 I'm going to change that to $7 or less. so I don't spend more than $700 because contract is $100, right? So I have to multiply that by $100. That's as much as I know about options. Give me the ticker, call or put, strike price, expiration date must be tomorrow, current ask price per share, total cost, why you chose it, momentum, volume, chart, news, etc. And tell me exactly how to buy it on Robin Hood web, step by step like I'm a beginner because I am a beginner. And I'm going to do it on Robin Hood web because I use Robin Hood and I can share my screen more easily that way.
Starting point is 00:24:39 So this is actually my real Robin Hood account and my real money. This is not paper gain, paper money. I might lose two grand. Let's see. Okay, prompt there. Let's go to Gemini. Same prompt there. 2.5 Pro and let's go to GROC.
Starting point is 00:24:54 Same prompt there. Gemini's thinking chat GAPT is still thinking. GROC is still thinking. Who's going to be the fastest? All right. Gemini wins. Gemini says disclaimer. This is high risk.
Starting point is 00:25:05 And also, that's my same disclaimer to you. I don't know what I'm doing. I'm not an investment advisor. This is not investment advice. Most likely by the end of this video, you're going to see me lose a lot of money. Because I genuinely don't know how this is going to end. Look at my watch. It's 223.
Starting point is 00:25:19 Okay. All right, QQQQ. I know QQQQ, because I see commercials for it when I watch football games. That's how smart I am. All right. It tells me to buy a put option at a $449 strike price at $355 per share. Okay. I'm going to do that right now because we're short on time.
Starting point is 00:25:34 And then I will read why it tells me to do that. So, QQQ put 449. Okay. So we're going to go QQ, trade options. We're going to go put. Scroll down here to 449. Okay. So we ran into a little hang up here, which Gemini, you're already failing.
Starting point is 00:25:52 Okay. The price was outdated. It was using an outdated price because the current share price is 556. It was telling me to shoot for 449. That's not even viable. I basically asked Gemini, hey, what are you doing? Are you sure this is right? And it's like, oh, you're right.
Starting point is 00:26:06 It's wrong. And so the current price is 566. It's telling me to buy at 564 strike price. So new instructions say, 580 per share, 564 strike price. Okay. And after what, four prompts, it's saying that I'm done with Google AI Pro or I'm done with the usage because I haven't upgraded at Google AI Pro. Come on, Google.
Starting point is 00:26:29 It's fine. I don't need you anymore anyway. Okay, buy, put 564 strike price. All right. 580 per share, limit price, time and force, good for day, 580 bucks. All right, let's review the order. Okay, 580 for the right to sell 100 shares of QQQ for 564 per share by August 8th. If QQQ shares aren't 564 or lower on August 8th, this option will expire worthless.
Starting point is 00:26:57 This doesn't include regulatory fees. All right, should we submit? Let's do this. Boom. Done. I feel like an idiot right now. And so many of you are probably laughing. But we're doing this.
Starting point is 00:27:08 We're doing this for the content. Whatever. Don't tell my wife. All right. Let's go to what GROC spit out. And we'll do chat GPD last. Okay. GROC.
Starting point is 00:27:17 Ticker. AAPL. Apple. Call. Strike price. 217.5. Expiration date. Tomorrow.
Starting point is 00:27:24 Current ask. 345. Total cost 3. 345. Oh, I didn't tell you why Gem and I thought that I should do this. So it said there's a valid bearish thesis. It thinks the market's going to sell off. tomorrow, yada, yada, yada.
Starting point is 00:27:38 It says the QQQ is weaker than the SPY today. When the market fears rate hikes, high growth tech socks are often the first to be sold off. Strike price selection. Currently trading at 450. See, and that was wrong. Okay, anyway, back to Grock. Leader in the market, yada, yada, yada. Okay, let's go buy some Apple options.
Starting point is 00:27:56 So, all right, we're going to go to trade Apple options. We're going to go buy expiring tomorrow. Tomorrow's my anniversary, by the way, 17 years married to my beautiful wife. Probably not the best day to tell her that I lost $2,000 for the content. All right, we're going to buy. We're going to call $217.5 strike price. Okay, there it is. Buy to open and the quantity to one contract.
Starting point is 00:28:22 Limit order type 345 is a limit price. I don't know what I'm doing. This is so funny. All right, I just told Grock because it's been about 15 minutes since I first prompted it. It's now 237 in the market close. in 23 minutes. So I just want Grock to know that the price changed. Does this strategy want to change at all? Okay. It's telling me to do the same thing. All right, you are paying $3.45 for the right to buy 100 shares of Apple for $217.5 per share by August 8th. If Apple shares aren't $217.5 or higher on August 8,
Starting point is 00:28:55 this option will expire worthless. This doesn't include regulatory fees. Submit. Okay, done. All right. Now, Chad GPD. It is telling me to buy QQQQQ, call, $567 strike price, $1.85 a share, $185 per contract. All right, let's do it. I'm an expert by now. This is my third in 20 minutes. I'm an expert. Buy call 567. Trade options. Buy. Call 567. Expiring tomorrow. Okay. We're buying one contract for QQQ. Call option 567, which is right on the money. Look at me talking like an expert, we're going to review the order. You're paying $185 for the right to buy 100 shares for 567 a share. If KKK shares aren't 567 or higher on August 8th, this option will expire worthless to sudden-acute, include regulatory fees. So I think I'm doing this wrong because I'm also
Starting point is 00:29:50 betting on KKK to go down with my other trade. Gemini told me, I don't have any faith in Gemini. So you could say I'm hedging my bet, but I think I'm doing it the wrong way. So I'm just being an idiot. Let's do it. All right, we have one small problem here. Chad GPD's data was outdated. And so the bid in the ask right now is between 278 and 277. And so I need to fix my order or it will never get filled. So I'm just going to put it right there, right there. 567 strike price, 277 limit price. Order received done. Let's do 280. Oh, I got filled. All right. Okay. two of three have been filled. The other one did not fill, probably because it was not anywhere close to the bin and the ask.
Starting point is 00:30:39 So let's go back and fix that real quick before the market closes in 12 minutes. My heart's a pounded. So I'm actually going to use Chad GPT to finish Gemini's job here. I'm going to ask QQQQ is at 568 right now and the market closes in 11 minutes. I want to buy put options that expire tomorrow at 565. The bid and ask is 96. What trade should I make for that one? Funny story.
Starting point is 00:31:20 Like over a decade ago, I had this hustle where I was buying cars on Craigslist. And if I typed in QQQQ, it was like a keyboard shortcut on my eye. iPhone or MacBook that would ask that question, is your car still available? It was just like a really quick way of me asking the same question over and over and over. So to this day, when I type in QQQ, it says, is your car on CL still available? That's why my prompt led with that. Okay, hit the ask at 96. So the trade fills instantly. Could grab seven contracts, but you know what? Let's buy five contracts. All right. And I'm still recording my screen. So let's buy a put, 565, five contracts. tracks, $500, review. If QQQQS shares aren't lower than $565 on August 8th, these options will expire
Starting point is 00:32:10 worthless. So I'm betting both sides of QQQ. Let's see how this goes. So I'm for sure going to lose tomorrow one way or another. Will it fill my order? Order filled. Okay. Okay. So I'll put the screen recording up on YouTube, but you can see right here, I have three options open. QQQQ put, 565, QQQ call at 567, and Apple call at 217.5. Let's see how this goes in 24 hours. All right, one day has passed it as August 8th, 955 in the morning. The market just opened about an hour ago, and I want to ask GROC, Gemini, chat GPT, what I should do with these options.
Starting point is 00:32:49 I have three. I'm going to prove to you. Here they are. Two of them are looking good. One of them is looking bad. And of course, at least one of them is going to look bad because I took both sides of my QQQQ trade. Remember, Jim and I told me that it would go down today. ChatGBTGBT told me it would go up.
Starting point is 00:33:05 So I took both sides of that. And then Grock told me to buy Apple options that I should be bullish on Apple. So let's see how it's going. Okay, let's look at my Apple call options. Boom. I'm up $230. If you look at my QQQ put options, I am down $435. And if you look at my QQQQ call option, I am up $320.
Starting point is 00:33:30 So I'm going to ask all three models now if I should close these out or if I should wait until they expire at the end of the day. So let's go ahead and make this simple. And I'm going to start with GROC, which recommended Apple. And I'm going to say, all right, Grock, I did what you suggested yesterday. Here's my position right this second one hour after the market. opens. Should I close it out or hold until it expires this afternoon? All right, let's do the same thing with Gemini in chat GPT. Okay, Gemini won't even let me drag this screenshot over. One more data point of why I hate Gemini. Oh, and I can't even use Gemini 2.5 Pro until 2 p.m. this afternoon
Starting point is 00:34:27 because I gave it like four prompts. So I expired my free trial or my free usage. So what I have to do here is get a free trial for another Google AI Pro account. And I literally just have to do. Oh, I'm not eligible for a free trial, but I can still subscribe without it. Okay. I don't want to anymore. You're stupid.
Starting point is 00:34:51 So we're going to cheat. We're going to ask chat GPT. Here's what I'm going to do. We're going to go back to chat GPT. And this is chat GPT5 now. We're going to start a new chat and we're going to say, I'm going to add a screenshot of what Gemini told me to do and then add a screenshot of my current trade to buy this trade yesterday. Now I am underwater an hour after market opened today.
Starting point is 00:35:22 Should I close my QQQQ? now where it's at or wait until it expires at the end of today. All right. So chat ChaptuPT5 is coming in to pick up where Gemini sadly left off. And then we're going to go to our QQQQ calls. And we're going to go back to chat GPT in the other window. And we're going to ask, okay, we're going to say, home. Great call yesterday. The market opened an hour ago and this is my current position.
Starting point is 00:36:07 Do I close it out or wait until it expires at the end of today? While we wait for Chad GPT, let's see what GROC said. Based on your current position details, I recommend closing it out and out to lock in your profits. Yada, yada, yada, here's why. I don't care. to do it before it's too late. All right. Apple. Okay, I'm glad it told me how to do it because I literally don't know. Okay, click on account options, Apple, options, click position, trade or sell to bring up the order ticket. Okay, I'm going to review order and I'm going to sell it for $589. Boom. Done. I'm wealthy. I am rich. Okay, so I made $425, $5.25, $270.00. on Apple Options. Thank you, Grock for. I like you now. Okay, you just paid for my Twitter
Starting point is 00:37:03 premium subscription for a year. Now, let's go back to ChadGBT. So chat GPT as well says sell it now, lock the win. Okay, boom, boom, boom. Let's do it. Looking good. Looking good. Review order, submit. Pending, pending. Still pending. Done. Done. Filled. Awesome. Cool. I'm a rich man. Now let's go back to the other chat gp t window jim and i told me to buy this now i'm under water here's my blunt take close it now this is laity yady yada yada yeah okay i guess all three won't me to close which is probably common advice i'm guessing here's what chat jpt says okay okay all right filled let us add up our damage QQQQ, QQQ, QQQ put, QQQ, call. All right, all five contracts have sold.
Starting point is 00:38:02 Let's look at my damage here. I lost $440 on my QQQ put. Okay, on my QQQ call. I made $633. It cost 277 total profit of $356. We're going to add that in there. still underwater. Thankfully, Apple will save me. I bought the Apple call for $325. I sold it for $596. I made $271 of profit. As you can see right here. All in all, I made $187 of profit. I invested $325 in Apple, 277 in QQQ, and 475 in QQQ. So 277, 455,
Starting point is 00:38:49 equals some. So I invested $1,057. And now I have $1,244, which is a return of exactly 17.69%. So I made three trades, all of them validated by AI. And this must just be confirmation bias because I've never liked Gemini. I don't like Gemini. I'm not going to like Gemini. You're just not cool Gemini. Okay. If it weren't for you, if I only would have listened to GROC and chat GBT, I would have made $627 of profit. I would have made a 60% day over day return, and instead I made a 17.69% day day over day return. Still not bad. I'm not mad about it. So sample size of one day. Results not guaranteed. Do your own research. I'm the worst investor in the world. Don't listen to me. This isn't investment advice, but it gave me some pretty good investment advice. So who won the most?
Starting point is 00:39:48 I was chat GPT. Chad GPT 5 made me $400 profit on my $277 investment over the course of about two business hours. Not bad, not bad. Let me know if I should do other model competitions like this or other like money making challenges like this. And I will because I got a lot more ideas like this. Thanks for hanging out on the Kerner office.

There aren't comments yet for this episode. Click on any sentence in the transcript to leave a comment.