The Last American Vagabond - 25% Of People Who Received Covid Shot Had Negative Immune Responses

Episode Date: December 15, 2023

Article by Scott Armstrong | Rebunked News | @RebunkedNewsClip from The Daily Wrap-Up with Ryan Cristián* The MRNA “Glitch”, The Murder Of Dr. Refaat Al-Areer, US Vetos Ceasefire & October 7 False Flag (12/8/2023)For more, please visit TheLastAmericanVagabond.comFollow TLAV on Twitter: @TLAVagabond“Nonsense Proteins”Last week, The Telegraph reported that MORE than 1 out of 4 people experienced an “unintended immune response” following the Pfizer COVID injection protocol. This is the link to the article on The Telegraph. You will see that it is behind a paywall, so here is the Archive.is link that will allow you to read and share the article without having to go behind the paywall. The Archive.is link shows an archived version of the article from the original publication date, December 6, 2023, with the headline reading as follows: This is what the article looks like right now on The Telegraph:It is amusing that they removed the word “More” after it was published. This information strikes at the very heart of the COVID injection’s “safe and effective” narrative, so all efforts are being made to downplay the significance of this report. The article starts by indicating that the injection caused an “unintended immune response created by a glitch in the way the vaccine was read by the body.” Well that is shocking.The article goes on to say: No adverse effects were created by the error, data show, but Cambridge scientists found such vaccines were not perfect and sometimes led to nonsense proteins being made instead of the desired Covid “spike”, which mimics infection and leads to antibody production.Nonsense proteins??? That has to be one of the craziest things I have heard yet in this COVID saga. Dr. Simon Goddek summarizes my thoughts exactly:FrameshiftingAll of this information is in reference to a study published in Nature entitled “N1-methylpseudouridylation of mRNA causes +1 ribosomal frameshifting” (funny enough, the study was not referenced anywhere in the Telegraph article, so I had to hunt it down myself). The paper asserts that a phenomenon known as “frameshifting” could occur, which may result in unintended immune responses. According to the conclusion of the paper: We show that 1-methylΨ is a modified ribonucleotide that significantly increases +1 ribosomal frameshifting during mRNA translation and that cellular immunity to +1 frameshifted products can occur following vaccination with mRNA containing 1-methylΨ. To our knowledge, this is the first report that mRNA modification affects ribosomal frameshifting.This is laid out in layman’s terms in the Telegraph article: It was thought the minor tweak to uridine caused no problems in cells, but a team of researchers at the University of Cambridge’s Medical Research Council (MRC) Toxicology Unit have now found when this partially synthetic code is read, the protein-making machine in the body sometimes struggles with the uridine analogues.Because it is not a perfect fit for what is expected, there can be a momentary pause which causes the process to stutter and a letter in the code can get skipped, much like a bike slipping a gear.This process, called frameshifting, throws out the way the code is interpreted as it relies on groups of three bases, known as codons, being read in the right order.This issue, caused by the jab’s code, throws the process completely out of sync and the entire subsequent code becomes garbled.In the case of the Covid jabs, the end result is a nonsensical and harmless protein, the team found, which the body attacks and leads to an immune system flare-up. The new study, published in Nature, found this occurred in around 25-30 per cent of people.The following Substack article by Igor Chudov does a good job of explaining what “Frameshifting” is and how it could be dangerous: The Glitch That Won The Nobel PrizeThe punchline of this entire story is that in 2023 Katalin Karikó and Drew Weissman were jointly awarded the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine for the development of the synthetic uridine compound utilized in the COVID injections, and it’s now being attributed with causing over 25% of the people injected to suffer negative immune responses. According to Nature:Their breakthrough discovery in 2005 showed that replacement of uridine with pseudouridine renders mRNA non-immunogenic. This paved the way for the development of mRNA-based vaccines at unprecedented speed, saving countless lives during the COVID-19 pandemic.Still Trusting The Science?The Last American Vagabond, along with many other independent media outlets, have been hammering the incredibly deceptive and scandalous COVID injection narrative from every angle as more and more information comes to light about the dangers and ineffectiveness of these shots. It is refreshing to see this information slowly starting to trickle its way into more “mainstream” sources. The tide is shifting in the information battle and you can help by sharing this article far and wide.Question everything! Note to the Readers:Thank you for your ongoing support of The Last American Vagabond. TLAV is a Value-For-Value experience. We want to invite you to subscribe to our Substack for as little as $5/month to join the discussion, comment on posts, join the TLAV Roundtable Discussions and feel good about supporting independent media that you value. Upgrade to the Founding Member Level for the opportunity to have a monthly Q&A with Ryan as well. Thank you to all of you who already support TLAV in all the various ways that you do with your time, talent and treasure. Get full access to The Last American Vagabond Substack at tlavagabond.substack.com/subscribe

Now, Dr. Simon Godek writes, as of, I think this was yesterday, two did it yesterday, yeah, the telegraph, one in four, one in four who received the Pfizer injection. Now, by the way, really, this is just an MRI shot, as I see it, experienced unintended immune responses. Now, you guys, that's not a sore shoulder. That is not a headache. That is not queasiness. Untended immune responses can be deadly. None of them are positive, right? point is an unintended immune response is when you have all the different things we've been dealing

with, the antibody dependent enhancement, the shingles, everything. So there you go. One and four, 25% of everyone that got these safe and effective Nobel winning prize shots that are changing the world could have died. Could have had cancer. Could have had myocarditis. Could have had antibody dependent enhancement. Could right now be suffering from a thousand different things you're calling long COVID. Yep. That's the successful. injection that saved the world. Obviously, I'm being facetious because it did not. And in fact, quite frankly, I think the evidence is plainly evident that it did not need to be made. This thing was less than the flu. That's according to the ionitis group that this was always less than the

flu that still nobody is challenged. He says, just a little glitch, they say, 25% isn't a glitch. The good news is that it's all coming out. There's nowhere to hide. Heads must rule, assuming they do anything about it. Igor Chudov points out, we were told that COVID- vaccines were extensively tested. We know they weren't. Turns out that pseudoridine in them causes random protein garbage to be generated. God, I sure wish people would listen when we were talking about this a year ago exposing our bodies to danger. It is called frame shifting, the same as losing bits of a computer code. Isn't that interesting? Here's his substack. If you'd like to read more on it, I recommend you do. Bohemian atmosphere points out, it doesn't sound good. Here's BBC. It is the

translation process in the ribosomes that can go slow. lightly wrong, the researchers say. Where were these researchers when this first came out? All this evidence was very clear, was static, right? The information was there. The end result is still get great protection, they say. But can there be a few extra-undited proteins? Wow. Still good, though. Still good. Still safe and effective. Still safe and effective. Just don't mind the people dying in the street. Safe and effective. COVID study, MRD vaccines could be fine-tuned. My God, fine-tuned, right? After 20-23. fine tune.

I mean, this is just, this is my point. They will drag this dead body of an agenda as far as you'll let them. It's just staggering to me. Now, I was going to read something on that, but I'm just going to leave it for now. Ozzy 17 also writes explosive study published in nature, the one we just read, shakes the core of MRI technology. He's also sharing more on another cancer drug at the end of the article. But here's the point I wanted to read. mistranslational events may increase toxicity.

This is exactly the point. This is from the same nature article. These findings are a particular importance to our fundamental understanding of how ribonucleotide modification affects some RNA translation. Gee, don't you think we should have figured that out before you gave it to everybody in the world? I mean, this is why this is so obvious. Good thing, we're figuring all this out on the fly. Ask Netanyahu, he tested everybody in Israel together to figure it all out.

Like, I mean, it's not even up for debate. This is as shockingly obvious as it's ever been. Good thing we're understanding how this works after three plus years and for designing and optimizing feature MRNA-based therapeutics. Is that what we want? To avoid mistranslation events that may decrease efficacy or increase toxicity. Now, see, this is the I almost wonder whether that in and of itself is the scapegoat. The excuse.

even if it's real. Without any of this, it's still deadly. The spike protein is still deadly, right? All the things we've talked about. Everything involved in this, every angle of this is explicitly dangerous. So whether, like, let's just say they go, oh, well, now we figured it out, right? We missed it. The extra protein, the frame shifting.

That's why it's hurting more people. But you've been telling us it wasn't hurting more people and that we were all conspiracy theories. No, no, you're right, but now we know why, so you're still wrong. Isn't that always how it works? And they'll go, oh, that's why it wasn't working enough. And that's why people were dying. And now we fixed it. So shut up and take the new one.

That's what that feels like to me. Sort of like Cadlet coming out and going, yep, we know it was the proximate cause, but we're going to make it better this time. That's what's going on.