The Last American Vagabond - Controlled Political Leak Pipeline Exposed, Trump's Mystery Beef & The Control Grid Materializes

Starting point is 00:00:00 It starts with a simple question and ends in objective reality. Through our journey from there to here, we find one another and ourselves. And as the next 24 hours breaks free from our last, we gaze onward in reflection of the day. I have to stay in a joy. Welcome to the daily wrap-up. Saturday, August 22nd, 2026. Thank you for joining me today. Now, you definitely, if you're in contact with me,

Starting point is 00:00:47 remind me about doing that. So I had time today to do that. I could have played a whole bunch of songs. I'm sorry for the delay to get started today. Just a couple of background things. Nothing, nothing crazy. Ultimately, I'm trying to get in a habit for those that are new. They're just kind of filling that opening gap with playing some music.

Starting point is 00:01:02 Mine, mine included, but plenty of others. Because you know, we're not worried about copyright strikes around here. So, like, I played Ben Harper and some other good ones. So give me some, you know, thoughts on it if you want something to be played. Or people out there that, that's actually a better idea. For those of you out there that have music that you think is, you know, whether it's popular or publicized or sold or not, but more likely leading towards those out there that are, you know, artists that don't have the,

Starting point is 00:01:25 you know, talking about things they don't want you to sing about, don't have the pathway to get it heard and you like your music. Send it my way. I'll take and listen. And if I like it, I'll play it. But, you know, don't, don't, Don't expect it. Only if it's something I think is good and I want to play and so on. But let me know. So I'd like to do that. That'd be a cool idea to help promote people that

Starting point is 00:01:43 are otherwise able to do it. But of course, lots to talk about. I think main things that I'm like on my mind today, I want to follow up with some of the things I was discussing yesterday. But just in general, I'm sure you can see there's a lot of things that are circulating today and a lot of the continuing conversations, Ron, and so on and just many of them. Many of them were continuing to follow up on, by the way, whether or not we talk. about them every day, including, you know, NDAA discussions, where that goes. I mean, everything we've talked about in general sense, I've got folders for everything, trying to keep eyes on what's going on out there. But important to do it yourself. But today I want to talk a little

Starting point is 00:02:19 bit to start about something, the follow up on that anarchism conversation that I do think is very relevant, and not just about that one ideology or thought, but just really about challenging these classically held beliefs that, you know, like for example, that government is the only way that society functions. Maybe that is the case. I don't agree with that, but who knows, maybe I'm wrong. But it's worth discussing. It's these weird conversations that are just kind of like, nope, nope, that's nope, we don't agree with that. Nobody's allowed to talk about that. But free speech and freedom of ideology and, you know, all the things we tell ourselves. And clearly there's lines that are drawn. And that's whether that's sort of society doing itself because they're afraid or, you know,

Starting point is 00:02:54 power structures creating that. It's still something we need to break through. And I think, at least I argue that. So I'm going to make some points on that that I think are relevant. And and some of the comments that I think add to that. I definitely want to talk about the, it's sort of a rally event that I use the picture for today and just really kind of a springboard point to make a larger point about what I think is happening again, but also just interesting to see what's happening.

Starting point is 00:03:17 And it kind of just speak to the growing awareness of what the government at large, I argue, is. That's the real point. But if you can't see that, really just people that are calling out Trump as conservatives. But I do think it's emblematic of something much bigger than just this moment in people seeing through Trump. I think that's important to think about. I want to talk about what I titled today,

Starting point is 00:03:36 the leak pipeline, which is something we've talked about a lot. It shouldn't be a secret to anybody that both sides of the paradigm, otherwise known as your U.S. government, all of it, the one thing it is, that, you know, drip leak things out to journalists that they want to be shown. Or even in a different situation, FBI, which we'll talk about again today in relation to that last case and follow up on, it's, it's, I mean, I mean, I've seen myself at least a couple of examples where it got retroactively caught, where the FBI leaked information to the media, and the media reports it as an anonymous source, and the FBI points to that report as the justification for what they want to do. It's very common, and the same thing,

Starting point is 00:04:18 kind of, the same kind of thing happens here. And so we'll talk about whether or not this whole leak dynamic from data Republicans is, as some of them really want to frame it as the deep state Democrats secretly in the rats that are leaking around Trump or however whether you think it's good or bad for Trump that it's just part of their agenda. I you know and it's or beyond all of the partisan nonsense that it's just what your government does. They lie. They manufacture leaked stories and you know fake social media personalities. It's part of the game. I also want to get into the fake meat point that we include in the title, which we've already talked about yesterday and kind of a quick overview. Really not.

Starting point is 00:04:58 you, but just a passing point, rather. And interestingly enough, something that I jokingly said, I think is starting to circulate through the conversation. And maybe I wasn't the only one that made the point, but maybe there's more relevance than we think, but we'll go through that. And I want to talk about, of course, as I said, the FBI, what I argue is an entrapment plot, false flag, if you will. It really does fall under that category if you understand how that can be played, but really just setting people up to be tackled as domestic terrorists. And I want to, and one of the post we put out, a great article from the Free Thought Project that goes back to 2018 that we posted on Last American Vagabond when we were doing repost back in the day. And it's still, I mean, it's every time that gets posted out, if it's in a certain time frame, it just explodes online.

Starting point is 00:05:40 I think it's because it's specifically framed as a right-wing terrorist. And it's what I think the platform allows to go viral because it's within the paradigm. And I think it's very important to make that point. Regardless, it shows you people are very attuned to the, attuned to the idea of the FBI manufacturing plots. I mean, it's not, it's clearly not a secret. And I think it's important to see that it's something people are very eager to look at and going through, and most of these will show you today are from the Free Thought Project, many from Rachel Blevins.

Starting point is 00:06:05 So I don't believe this overlap with them anymore, but was back in the day and did great work about the FBI, literally setting up people, multiple cases of which are people that are mentally challenged or, you know, schizophrenic or any number of things where they take advantage of that. And of course, the larger points we want to get into around. sort of the infiltration parts, the Iran conversation, and surveillance, Anderil, and the border. And I think that's an important part of this because as I just generally titled today, there are so many examples you look around of what we think we describe as a control grid being put in place.

Starting point is 00:06:42 But, you know, largely I would argue sort of infrastructure, you know, that's the best word for all of it in one, but, you know, things that aren't necessarily seen by everybody yet. Surveillance that's over there, but not interconnected, or at least as we see it, not being shoved in front of us. But it's there, right? But what I think of, when you think of what's going on on the border, it's not new, but they've just recently, like, tripled down or doubled down, but it's now triple the amount they originally agreed on. Anderil's now going to be putting these sort of biometric scanned all around the border. And to me, that's starting to really eerily represent exactly, exactly the physical, materialized representation of what that becomes.

Starting point is 00:07:20 It's not just, as we've always told you, and it trumps biometric border smart wall. It's not one way only. And it's also not just the border, as we've continually shown you with the 100 miles and the Constitution Free Zone. Literally people in Maine in any number of states go 100. I mean, the thing it's about miles into the state. If you live in that area, they can, they're, you're being surveilled. Same with the flock dynamic. And we're going to go over that. But it all comes together. And especially today, as I point out over the years, that some of these shows tend to really kind of just, you know, sink or rather, you know, fit together. Because you, I tend to go over a lot of things, and sometimes they don't necessarily overlap, and we just segue

Starting point is 00:07:59 into something new. But I try to organize it in a way that makes it feel interconnected, because I frankly think it is. And so today, think of it like that. As we start with the idea of, you know, the changing understanding of government and the discussion of other ideas and different opinions around that, consider that in the larger conversation. And you'll see these connection points. You'll see how this all interconnects, at least as I see it, in the fake social media conversation, the changing of the tune from different sides. I mean, there's a lot changing right now. And I think all of this, even to go back to the end point of the surveillance and the control

Starting point is 00:08:31 grid is arguably, I think, because of things that are changing. Now, that's always been the plan, but the way that it's being shoved down our throat when people clearly don't want it, including the wars we're seeing, it says something. So first, I want to make a comment that somebody, you know, I might have already said this a couple shows ago. I forget, but if I did, it's redundant. I just want to shout this out that somebody had recently. and we asked about the update on the independent media token.

Starting point is 00:08:56 And ultimately, it's something that is still in the works. I mean, where we left off, this is something that was started, Corey, in order to basically fund independent media. And the idea was to start something that was basically, you know, people could invest in it like a cryptocurrency. And once that, if and when it was successful, the point was that the wealth that built would be used to give like basically free money, no, you know, just hand it out as sort of a grant, if you will, to people in independent media.

Starting point is 00:09:26 And the board would vote on that, would give it out. And that would be the model. And people, if they, if they, just as it becomes a positive thing, people invest in it more and there'd be more funds. And so ultimately it was an idea. It was a framework. And so somebody asked to me, say, hey, we deserve an update. And I want to be clear, it's, I've been giving updates as it's been going on. Right now, it's been the same moment. The point would be that this is not some kind of a pump and dump dynamic or some kind of a scam. The point is it's something they're still trying to make work. And of course, he's being stepped on in a lot of ways we've gone over in the past. But ultimately, the point would be that this is still something he's trying to make work

Starting point is 00:09:58 and it might not work. And that's exactly as we framed in the beginning. So if you chose to, you know, buy in the token or not, as I said in the very beginning, completely your prerogative. I still support the idea. I just, it depends on whether it ultimately becomes successful. And so that's, I still argue it's something that is a great idea. The idea that you could have something built amongst the support of people in this

Starting point is 00:10:19 community that then creates a, fun that can be used to be given to other independent media. You know, and I think that's valuable. But anyway, I just thought it was important to update people on where that was. The, the, the, the, the, he, but basically, like, last I'd check with him, the point was essentially there's, there's these hurdles they're still trying to get over and they're trying to basically work within the system of the corrupt, you know, the same thing. But ultimately, it's still there and the price is sort of stagnant.

Starting point is 00:10:41 So that's where that is. But keep an eye on it. And if there is something that majorly changes, of course, I will let you know. Because essentially, if and when this becomes a viable thing, as Corey, told me, I'm supposed to be part of the board that gets to decide whether or not that gets told out into who. And so at the moment, that doesn't even exist as far as I can tell. It's just simply trying to get it off its feet. But may not happen. That's sort of the sad reality of some of these things is that, you know, as we all should be. And as Corey told you, we should be skeptical.

Starting point is 00:11:06 Like I say about me, question us, question intentions. But the point is that there are things like this that can be used to help people or, you know, using things in a way that fight back or, you know, all the different conversations there. And I just, we should always have hope for that. And I think that this is something that could be that if we support it, I guess, or if the system allows it to succeed. And those are very two different things, right? And today I think that's sort of what a lot of independent media get into today. Where you have all the right tools, you've got great opinions, you got, you know,

Starting point is 00:11:31 all the things that historically would have added up to success in this field, and it just doesn't happen. Now, that happens in general because there's just an oversaturated field. But it's different, though. There's a, like right now, even with what I, we have a level of success in this field that ultimately is hard to gain. And it's definitely not even comparable to some of these larger people out there.

Starting point is 00:11:53 But I still think it's been stagnant for a long time. And even on that note, on Rumble, for example, there's something strange going on. When you look at the comments and like, look at like the last one we had, I think the one about Trump making it easier for US or rather foreign companies to pretend to be U.S. companies,

Starting point is 00:12:10 it's got like 18,000 views. It's got one comment. And I just go, that just doesn't make any sense. I've got videos with a thousand views with 50 comments. You know, just, who knows, could just be random. But I just find that strange.

Starting point is 00:12:20 And I think there's a lot of stuff like that going on. And my point back to the input of media was that there's a lot of people out there that are being unjustly stifled because they've got the opinions that the powers that shouldn't be do not want being expressed. Now, people like us, we've developed a certain level of following. It stops that from just being stepped on. But, you know, if and when, of course, when that's right way to say that, when it comes to a point where they suddenly start shutting down internet connections,

Starting point is 00:12:44 digital IDs, financial choke points, you know, who knows, maybe that'll cut us off too. But like I said, and as Whitney and Eric and I've been talking about, like, there's going to come a time, hopefully not, but possibly where we need to find a way to keep this going without the access to these things. Whether that's print or whatever it becomes, you know, pirate radio dynamics, which we're already doing in YouTube, but just that was stifled, not allowed to get attention despite Richard Grove and James Corbett adopting it somehow just didn't catch on, even though it's a pretty great idea. The point would be that we need to find ways around that. I guess support your independent media out there, the ones that are, you know, striving to get

Starting point is 00:13:17 through that have great opinions that just don't get allowed to be seen because of the algorithmic channeling, important to think about. So on the idea of the anarchism conversation, that I did want to start with this because of yesterday's conversation, I found interesting, first of all, just to quickly recap, there was a post that went out that basically said an interesting thing to me, saying PSA to libertarians and anarchists and other anti-American. subversives. So literally calling, which was arguably at least framed as part of the major part of what was the actual MAGA movement, not the fake Trump side of it that pretended to be those things,

Starting point is 00:13:55 but the people that really wanted all those things, whether you agree with them or not, libertarian was a huge part of that. And so now you've got these basically what I argue, the fake MAGA, the people that blindly support Trump no matter what he says, they pretend to want to make America great again, who are saying that you're anti-American, if you believe in the things that they parented in the beginning of their when they're running for the election. That was crazy to me, but really it was about the idea of misunderstanding what anarchism is,

Starting point is 00:14:20 or libertarianism, or any number of the connections and overlaps, just volunteerism in general. This is somehow running chaos. And you had sort of a video about the people from the Mises Institute and others who were simply going, look, anarchy's the point. And because anarchy does not mean chaos.

Starting point is 00:14:36 And I'm going to make that point with some good videos from Lark and Rose today. as I hope I made clear yesterday, but, you know, I'm not an expert on these things. I've been this year, like, it's been years for me that I've been far more invested in this very direction. I mean, even if you listen to some of my older songs, like I just played, like, you know, some of those things are resonating with who, you know, what I was seeing then that I've evolved past. I'm not going to change it now. Like, you know, things that are more, you know, kind of stuck in the idea of the state and like, we the people, for example, you know, these are concepts that I believe in in a general sense, but not in the sense of

Starting point is 00:15:07 the state. Anyway, the point. is I've evolved a lot, but I'm still learning as I go along. And so people like Lark and Rose, if you have not looked into this conversation, I'll include all the links and his book. And, you know, it's important that you educate yourself on this. Because truly, and this is not meant to be insulting. As I'll briefly point to a part of a conversation about, you know, saying that, look, I don't feel like you understand what anarchism is and then acting like that's just a cop out to ignore what their criticisms are. It's like the whole reality is that there is nothing perfect. Anarchism has its issues like any other form of governance, self-governance, anything.

Starting point is 00:15:40 And so that's important to think about. Right now we live under so-called democracy with chaos everywhere, with crazy sociopaths and pedophile. Clearly, anything can lead to this position. So in saying that no, even if it meant chaos by saying, well, that'll create chaos. Like, what do you think we're living under right now? What do you think we're watching? You know, and it's like, so why don't we, no, that just doesn't sound very safe. Why don't we give that a try?

Starting point is 00:16:01 Like, I'd like to try something different than going through the same old hamster wheel. Anyway, this conversation was important because I was highlighting the fact that the misunderstanding of anarchism as just chaos and wanting things to burn is how the system frames the only ideology that I know of that has no place for rulers. Certainly has place for rules, for collaboration, for cooperation, for self-governance and decentralized forms of, that's the whole point. But if they frame it this way, they scare people in the thinking that this is not the answer, or at least not the direction. to think in. And the only way you see the world is living under their centralized control, which, by the way, is even contrary to what at least we understand the original founding father. Some of them believe this should be. So anyway, the point was this whole big thing about how you're basically a terrorist if you don't believe what Trump says in the government and lists off

Starting point is 00:16:52 a bunch of people like Ron Paul, Scott Horton, Thomas Massey, as if they're somehow terrorists and want violence, it's like if you listen to them at all, you clearly know that's not true. So what I found interesting is we went over that yesterday and made a whole point about it. And she, of course, blocked me, which I thought was funny, even though the name of the account is she thinks freely. Then she deleted the post today. And so I thought that was very interesting. What does that mean? And really, I posted this after she blocked me saying, who wants to teach this person about, you know, and the status in the comments, the definition of anarchy. They seem to embarrassingly think it means chaos. It's just the only form of society, as we just said, it has no place for hierarchical

Starting point is 00:17:28 structures, hierarchical structures, and coercive government institutions. Because we all want those. Don't we? Don't we all call for hierarchical structures and coercive government institutions? It's what we live under. But so the point was, what was interesting, she deleted the post. It tops his, Trump is the most America first president ever. I'm not going to get into all her things, but the idea that you would delete that. I mean, what does that say? So I personally, my gut tells me this is somebody who is trying to manipulate.

Starting point is 00:17:54 I don't know that for sure. Because why would, if you believe in all that, why would you delete it? Because some people came in and said, that's not it right. You have your ideals challenged and you run. That shows either weakness or you don't believe. leave in what you're saying. Just a guess. But into this, I thought it was interesting. And ultimately, there was a conversation, Polly posted underneath this that said, while the official definition doesn't include chaos in the model, the actual result would be chaos

Starting point is 00:18:17 until new hierarchies are established. Okay, people have opinions, right? I thought, okay, well, I wanted to engage in this genuinely because I think this is an important point. Because first of all, official definition, what does that even mean? People can give you definitions about democracy and fascism and all disagree. The point is, generally speaking, we know the general direction of it and the general conversation of these things, and anybody can act under those names and do what they want. But there are generally understood tenets of these things and all of them, right? And so the actual definition of anarchy doesn't just not include chaos. It explicitly goes through the reality of how it's organized, just not with

Starting point is 00:18:54 rulers. And as you said, the actual result will be chaos. Well, first of all, how in the world can we possibly know that? But it's important to understand that it's about under the hierarchies, are established is the whole point of what anarchism is trying to get away from. So if the point is that we will have chaos until we have more government, then I argue that you don't really understand even the argument that I'm making. But many of them argue this that think that without government, there would be chaos. I simply argue, and again, in good faith, I said certainly one of the many possibilities. But of course, no one could truly know that would be the outcome. Secondly, there's chaos right now. Hierarchies are full of chaos, and this is the most important part

Starting point is 00:19:33 to me and as many are seeing, they create chaos to socially engineer our lives. I'd like to try something different. Now, what's important is, you can get into the rest of the conversation if you want to. It gets ridiculous. And it's very like, you know, anyway, I don't even want to get into it because it's very contentious and unnecessary. And it really comes down to the bottom line point that it's like you're misrepresenting what I'm saying, which by the way, seems a common tactic for her. I just simply said, you know, this is something we should look. The idea has possibilities. And it's of the current, anyway, the point was to say that I don't think there's any flaws and to just dismiss people is the absolute last thing I'm doing in this conversation. You can look at my engagement

Starting point is 00:20:12 about this because I am still understanding these things. And the reality is trying, engaging with people to try to have conversations to further expand your understanding of different opinions. Not just shout down what doesn't make sense to you, which is what people do, even sometimes with good intentions, because they believe or convince themselves that this person's weaponized that or they're being played. And sometimes that is the case. But this is why it's always about question everything. Consider everything. So the point of this was that this wasn't the kind of preface for this conversation and understanding that there are people from the partisanship, not talking to Polly, but this point here, this person's account, who are out there trying to gaslight you into

Starting point is 00:20:49 thinking that people who are talking about limited government, which in fact, that was one of the main points, is that they literally say, you're not looking for limited government. You're looking for chaos. And it's like this, if you understand even the idea of limited government, being foundational to the beginning of this country, what do these people think they're talking about? Who are they pointing to? They're pointing to power structures that convince you their top-down absolute technocratic authoritarian control

Starting point is 00:21:12 equals founding fathers, constitution, democracy, free speech. It's all talking points. It's not true. And honestly, I do recommend you read through this because I find it interesting, the kind of things that you get in this conversation when just trying to have an actual engagement about what these things mean.

Starting point is 00:21:29 I'd let this up too. Oops. Okay, so here is my last interview with Lark and Rose. Oh, hold on. Oh, geez, that was weird. Okay, sorry about that, guys. Something happened with my window, and I thought for a second, I lost the whole show. Okay, we're good.

Starting point is 00:21:52 So, Lark and Rose interview, the illusion of authority and the collapse of the two-party paradigm. Important interview. Like I said before, we talked about this in 2024, and he, too, recognized a growing awareness of these things. And so I wanted to include, one, his most dangerous superstition by Lark and Rose audiobook. It's about, it looks like he read the whole thing, about 10 hours long. He reads the whole thing. And the most dangerous superstition, guys, authority, right? Government, the illusion of their authority over your life.

Starting point is 00:22:22 I'm going to let him explain this to you. So make sure you check this out. Put it in your, you know, your car, whatever it takes. Listen to it as you have time. Here is a quick little clip from ANR clips. Lark and Rose, what is anarchy? So I want to play this. And think about what he has to say here.

Starting point is 00:22:42 and understand the key point here is not necessarily that this is the answer. I mean, just like anything else, people could truly believe in the tenets of anarchism and then go out and do things that I disagree with. And that's the whole point. It's about your own direction, your own choice, freedom to do what you think is right. But understanding that a system today is not about you making those choices. It's about the illusion of you having choice under the construct of power structures that decide your, like here, you can choose between these three choices, kind of a thing.

Starting point is 00:23:12 But you know, you can't say those things. You can't think like that. If you do that, you're going to be called a terrorist. Like, we have to see where this ultimately already has been for a long time and is clearly going. Now, like I said, you may disagree with this general direction. But the idea is what I'm trying to open people up to of something different. Limited government, libertarianism, whatever you think, my idea is never being about labels. Because you can look through all these things and take the parts of it you like.

Starting point is 00:23:35 The idea is about understanding the choice of getting away from this top-down centralized control, which is even what the founding fathers argue. didn't want. So you could argue that they were more in line with this idea than they were with what's currently happening. Let me play this. We'll talk more. Technically speaking, anarchy doesn't mean chaos and mayhem.

Starting point is 00:23:56 It's a simple word with a simple meaning. The arque part refers to authoritarian domination and ruling. So, for example, monarchy, monarchy means rule by one person. oligarchy means rule by a small group of people and anarchy anarchy literally just means rule by no one and that's all it means it describes a society without a ruling class and that's all it doesn't mean no cooperation it doesn't mean no organization it doesn't mean every man for himself doesn't mean everybody living like cavemen it means rule by no one and that's all that it means. And the word anarchist just means somebody who advocates anarchy. So to be an anarchist means you don't want there to be a ruling class and that's all that it means. Now there is a separate definition of the word anarchy which does mean chaos and mayhem. Now I know many thousands of anarchists myself. None of them want chaos and mayhem.

Starting point is 00:25:10 But think about that for a second. And just to be clear, he's talking about the definition created by the power structures that you'll find in the dictionary or when you look it up on Google, which is what somebody else threw back at the online. Well, it says it right here. Google says chaos. It's like, that's my whole point, man. It's not about the idea of what they've defined it as. They also define, you know, terrorism as something very different today. They also define data function as something different today. That's how that works, guys. About what it really means, about the core original concept that was a, you know, as I read yesterday, right? The freeing from the shack or. of authority. Who benefits from there being one word that means no rulers and also means chaos and mayhem? People who want to rule maybe, they want us to associate a lack of authoritarian domination with chaos and mayhem, which is pretty damn ironic given that the vast majority of of chaos and mayhem and violence and destruction and oppression and war and genocide and so on and so on, throughout history had been a direct result of authoritarian power or government.

Starting point is 00:26:29 And as I said earlier, of course, you could start exactly what he's describing and it could still end up in chaos. Maybe just because they made bad choices, maybe just maybe because there's another, you know, centralized government elsewhere who sees you take, you know, that tries to, sabotage that? I mean, who knows? The point is that it's just by saying that might fail is it's an insane argument for why we shouldn't consider the difference and why it might be better for the way we live our lives. And again, the same point is right this moment, you're dealing with all the things they tell you might happen with something like this. All of it. Look around the world, guys, especially right now in this country, people are starting to recognize. So no, despite the dishonest way that

Starting point is 00:27:09 the media always portrays it, anarchist does not mean that you're, a Molotov cocktail throwing punk who just loves violence, it has exactly nothing to do with that, it means not wanting a ruling class, and that's all that it means. I, for example, am an anarchist because I don't think there should be a ruling class. I prefer the term voluntarious because it's more specific and more precise. It means I think that all human interaction ideally should be based on voluntary consent. It also avoids the confusion of people who think anarchy means chaos. They pretend that you just want things to burn down,

Starting point is 00:27:51 even as you explain to them, that's not what you mean. So when you talk about good luck trying to explain voluntary exchange as, well, guys, that's literally what they're doing, by the way, as something terroristic and dangerous. But that's what they do. When they talk about all these things as dangerous and chaos, they're literally describing people who want free exchange of individuals with freedom, as danger, chaos.

Starting point is 00:28:13 I mean, like he just explained, obviously, because they don't want that kind of a reality, because then there's no place for them. Do you know why sociopaths drive themselves at the top of the power structure? Because they know exactly what they would do to people when they have power, and they don't want to be that weak. I mean, there's people have written books about this conversation. And so the point becomes that if you did not have that power structure, well, then the reason they're so uncomfortable is because they have equal power with you.

Starting point is 00:28:39 I made the point yesterday about the idea of the weird, and very clear number association, you know, the percentage of sociopaths and psychopaths in the world compared to the percentage of politicians, weirdly the same. Not coercion and violence. And since government is all human interaction ideally should be based on voluntary consent, not coercion and violence. And since government is always about forcibly robbing and controlling people, I oppose all governments.

Starting point is 00:29:15 You can disagree with that, but you're lying to yourself because the truth is it's literally the case. But you can argue it's well, it's for good, you know, taxes and for building the road. It doesn't change the fact that they're saying give us that money or you will go to jail at the barrel of a gun. It's not hard to recognize. Now, you just see it differently and pretend that that's just you, you know, not being a good citizen or, you know, whatever.

Starting point is 00:29:33 It's all framing, but his point is the same. That is how that is done. And we argue, he argues that there's a possible path that. It does not involve, you know, being forced to live a certain life by the powerful people with guns, you know, or however you want to frame that. Like, it's just, again, I'm not trying to sell people on one idea. I'm trying to open people's minds to considering different pathways. Here he is talking about just simply the idea of anti-government versus people that, you know, recognize the government as a problem. Anti-government.

Starting point is 00:30:03 If somebody is having a tantrum and a protest and a riot and whatever you want to classify it as, demanding that they, their politician be put into power to rule over everybody and take your money and control your choices. That's not anti-government. They just want a slightly different flavor of authoritarian collectivism as compared to the flavor that most of the mainstream news wants. There's no real fundamental difference. I, on the other hand, am actually anti-government because I understand that government is inherently coercive and violent. It's inherently immoral. They will pretend that, well, government is just how we all get along and how we organize and cooperate. No, it isn't. Government by its very nature is a coercive authoritarian ruling class. What it does is boss you around and take your money and spend it on things that you wouldn't spend it on if you had the choice. I am against that, which means I am against government because government is always that.

Starting point is 00:31:05 It is always a violator of individual rights. I don't like that. That's what makes me anti-government. So when you see either the proud boys and the Trumpites whining that their tyrant didn't get into power and a different tyrant got into power instead, they're not anti-government. And when you see protests with Antifa whining that we need more government handouts and more leftists in office, they're not anti-government either. Both of those are just two sets of government worshipping dupes bickering over witching. jackboot they want on their throat. And of course, that's the point as usual that antifat, Antifa is literally acting in many fascistic ways. And I've said that forever. And so it's,

Starting point is 00:31:50 these are all constructs. Now, people fall into it and don't realize that. Sort of like the idea of understanding what al-Qaeda and ISIS have become. And you can look at Mahalban Salman from Saudi Arabia, who publicly admitted that these were groups that were manipulated and ultimately lost control of them or that the leaders don't actually believe in the ideology. The point is, though, that people that fall into it might and sometimes do. But it's still based on the idea of a manipulation from the top. As someone who is genuinely anti-government, I'm offended that you're pretending that they have anything to do with what I believe. I don't run around burning down people's properties because I believe in private property, which is why I oppose government.

Starting point is 00:32:30 Because government is always the biggest violator of individual rights, the biggest violator of property rights, the biggest thief in the world. So when somebody goes, anarchy and goes around burning down random properties and demanding government handouts, they don't even know what the word anarchy means. And this is the crux of the point. It's not dismissive to say you don't get it when you actually don't get it. When you don't understand or simply just fight back against it with actual, you know, the bottom line becomes that it's important to understand that the simple reality of what he just described. Right.

Starting point is 00:33:06 that people can do those things in any sense, democracy, fascism, communism, anarchy, people can go out and do what they want. It doesn't then mean everybody who's ever said that word is what they just did. And governments can clearly drive things to happen and then point to it and say, that's why red hats mean fascism or that's why this means, you know, that's what they do. And it works either way they do it. I think this is important. It's an easy thing.

Starting point is 00:33:30 And people are starting to see it. Anarchy means without rulers, without a ruling class. without government. When they're whining for a slightly different flavor of government, they're not anarchists. They might think they are, or they might be instigators or whatever, but when the media pretends that they are anti-government, that's ridiculous. So, I'm anti-government, they're not. Please stop calling them anti-government. It's insulting to me and others like me who believe in actual freedom and self-ownership and non-aggression and voluntarism, a stateless society where we're all

Starting point is 00:34:06 actually equals and none of us votes for a big political parasite to violently impose our will on other people. You know, you could disagree that says wrong, but it's hard to disagree with the general idea. Robert, I mean, and then plus what we're living through right now. Now, I want to play another important clip here. Carrie Wedler coming in with some important news. Amoste. Today we're going to explore the craziest chair position you've ever gotten into.

Starting point is 00:34:36 Get ready. In 1910, banking elites and members of the. the political class traveled to an island to secretly draft legislation that would establish a private central banking apparatus to take control of the American economy. In attendance were a senior partner at J.P. Morgan, an ex-assistant Treasury Secretary who was president of what would become Citibank, the director of Wells Fargo, the assistant treasury secretary, and a powerful politician. They started crafting the foundation of the Federal Reserve System, which would become law in 1913, with great encouragement from authoritarian

Starting point is 00:35:02 President Woodrow Wilson under the noble guise of preventing the economic instability of the past. They kept their meeting and roll in the legislation's secret for about 20 years. Do you believe these powerful men were looking out for the common people? A century since the Fed's establishment, the old top-down economic order remains. The value of the dollar has deteriorated, fueled by the Fed's manipulation of the money supply. Even the Fed admits the printing too much money devalues the currency, and yet they've directed the government to do exactly that. Its policies have helped perpetuate America's national debt crisis encouraging government spending outside its means with a currency whose value has been tied to nothing for decades. The Fed also helped fund both World War, supporting the establishment of the same

Starting point is 00:35:37 American Empire that continues to wreak havoc and add to the debt today. And that original promise of faithfully shepherding and stabilizing the economy, the 20th century and beyond continued to experience economic instability and hardship. The Federal Reserve cast the appearance of being an extension of democracy. In reality, it represents brazen cronyism, concentrating wealth and power at the top while the peasants struggle to survive as inflation hits them the hardest. They're forced to shoulder the costs of interest paid on this debt-driven system to fund an out-of-control authoritarian government that doesn't care about them. What interests the Fed has paid back has not been refunded to the tax cattle. It goes to the government. The system doesn't serve the people.

Starting point is 00:36:10 It serves the people in control of it and their own power, which is nowhere more apparent than in the history of the Fed's chairs who have unprecedented influence over the economy. It's the craziest chair position you've ever gotten into. The first to hold the chair position of this financial elite club was then President Wilson's son-in-law, who was the Fed's ex-officio chair when he was still Treasury's. For over a century, almost exclusively high-ranking political officials and bankers have chaired the Fed. Fast forward to present day, and yet another financial elite holds the position, one who served on the Bilderberg Steering Committee and also came from the Fed's board of governor. Kevin Warsh.

Starting point is 00:36:40 It's a big club and you ain't in it. And now the Fed is considering expanding its egemony into the digital age with a central bank digital currency. While worldwide efforts to impose such digital currencies have struggled to gain traction, the threat of CBDCs and all the surveillance and control they bring with them still looms. U.S. politicians' efforts to ban them, unsurprisingly, leave much to be desired. But it's not too late to change course. Politicians and bankers aren't going to save us, but everyone has the ability to start opting out. of the system. One way to do this is choosing to use competing currencies that threaten this

Starting point is 00:37:08 financial monopoly while protecting privacy and sovereignty. Now is the time to break free not only of the Fed and government's financial power over you, but the belief that they should have power over you or anyone at all. Follow Carrie Wedler. Always doing good work. She's just fantastic. Now the point that I mean, the joke really was that, oh here, right, this is the post. I can't be sure. I didn't talk to her about it, but I get the sense he's trying to making fun of those videos where you've got those girls like literally sitting with their leg spread open talking about politics. Like, I mean, it's obviously not even secret. Like, it's very, very obvious what they're doing.

Starting point is 00:37:49 And yet it still just continues. And people follow. It's very, very weird. So I argue this is what my guess is that she's using that to sort of make fun up to spring into an obvious, very important conversation using the joke of the, whatever, the craziest chair position. But in general, Carrie's fantastic. You should check her out.

Starting point is 00:38:07 But think about what she just said there in the, in overlapping with what we just discussed. I mean, so whether or not you agree with the idea of anarchism or anything else, what she just described is a long-term, left-right, all-of-government problem where they do not care about us. They only care about maintaining control, financially, socially, and everywhere else. And the Fed is just one example of that, you know, the totally not governmental thing that we're never taught about that's complete. It's so broken, guys, and just realize that this is how these things continue. And as we squabble over the next person to stand in that White House, it doesn't actually. change anything. That's just important to think about. Now, getting into the part of the two-party

Starting point is 00:38:47 illusion discussion in that rally, first joking again, SLO News Day shared this, Steve shared the post of this, and I'm just want to really show you. It was Matt Vaughal here, you know, on a very clear Trump sort of operative, whether it's deliberate or not. It's, you know, person who's app. I argue one of these fake megatotypes that are out there going, Trump's the best no matter what, you know, all the time, even though he's double-crossed everybody on, on the actual people that wanted the things he was promising. And this is him saying, this is the first Trump rally of my life.

Starting point is 00:39:14 Anyone saying Maga is dead has clearly not been to a Trump rally? Okay, well, first of all, it's not even that big. It's just funny. He spans all the way around. It's just, it's, you know, it's not that large, but it's, you know, not small either. The point is, Steve says they might not, they might not be dead,

Starting point is 00:39:28 but this rally is clearly being held in God's waiting room. If you look closely, it's actually kind of crazy. This, the whole joke is you today that the only people that support Trump or the boomers that watch Fox News. Fox News. And if you look, they're not wrong, guys. I mean, you're hard pressed to find anybody without white hair. Not even kind of joking, really. I mean, it's crazy. And I think that says something. I think it says it's a demographic thing. And I think it shows you clearly that this is a

Starting point is 00:39:55 dying movement that the people who they will tell you the most important demographic is the young kid, you know, they don't have it. They have the diehard long term support who barely even pays attention. They just go Trump the best. He said the things I like back then and I'm going to or, you know, I'm not going to speak for the entire demographic, but I'm arguing that that's where you end up as you're sort of, you know, like it's becoming more of a thing that I'm like in line with them and I'm just committed to it as opposed to following day to day and going, whoa, okay, maybe is liar.

Starting point is 00:40:22 You know, it's like that's what we should be doing, whether you believe in or not, hold their feet to the fire. But what's interesting, now here's the thing on this clip, same rally. This, this, the argument of this is this has been faked. It does kind of seem that way, to be honest. one because it's loud and it sounds like the guy filming is doing it and he spans and you don't see anybody else saying it. And there's also nobody reacting. But then again, it could be loud. So just know that this is what people, there's, it's not verified as far as I can tell,

Starting point is 00:40:51 but the argument is this has been dubbed over. The reason I'm including it is because of the next part of it, which shows you that this, whether this is accurate or not, there are people that were at the rally who were, you know, adversarial at least trying to challenge the Trump support. And so that's where this came from. But I've also seen, I believe it was Marginel of Green and some others reference this. Doesn't mean that's real, right? But just consider that it could be fake, but I can't verify that. But the point was that people are now, and let's even put it this way too,

Starting point is 00:41:17 this is happening. There are people that are out at Trump events or elsewhere who are now criticizing. The guy that went to his rally and was making fun of him behind himself, behind him the whole time. People in the crowd with him saw him and didn't even care. Who knows why? But here's this clip. We'll discuss more after him. It cusses, by the way.

Starting point is 00:41:39 I forgot about that. So for children watching earmuffs, here's the cussing. He's calling him an effing traitor. Trader! Trader! Now, you know, honestly, there even sounds like people right there next to him are like, like yelled back at him. I don't know, it's hard to tell.

Starting point is 00:42:03 You know, also this doesn't seem like somebody who would be saying that if they're on the inside of that railing, you know? So it's up in the air for me. It's probably fake if you, if based on what we're seeing there. But my point was that there are people that are in his, because the people that shared this are people that were previously Trump supporters. That's just the sentiment that we're seeing right now. Also worth pointing out that I think this is something that has been obvious since the beginning of the administration, guys, since before it, honestly, I've been seeing

Starting point is 00:42:28 the breakdown of the two-party illusion for a long time. People just don't want to hear it because it's something that is invested in. I think it's pretty clear now, isn't it? But here is the rally. And this is interesting. This is the image I used. Protester rejected, and he was kicked out the rally. At last I checked, he doesn't see him he was arrested, which would have made this way more crazy, but he was ejected. And not for doing anything illegal, guys. He showed up wearing a shirt that says, kill your local pedophile. And they lost their minds. And as many people are saying, like, what a perfect representation of the current, what I argue is the dead, dying fake magicide of it, not the one they're not calling him out, that they now are attacking

Starting point is 00:43:09 somebody for saying arrest pedophiles? That's quite a turn, isn't it? Well, or you could argue they just recognize this person was there to criticize Trump, and that's what they're really angry about, not necessarily don't arrest pedophiles, but either way, it's pretty telling, guys. So I think I've got it highlighted here. A pair of protesters were rejected from Trump's rally in Muriel Beach, including one wearing a t-shirt proclaiming, kill your local pedophile. The protesters were also wearing hats embroidered with upside-down flags, which is used to basically save a country in distress.

Starting point is 00:43:40 and it says as the pair being heckled or began heckling the president at this at the rally on Friday night he crowd the crowd shouted over them chanting USA USA and it says it's unclear what they were shouting okay so right there I found that telling because here's a video of somebody yelling traitor and Donald Trump and what they're saying in the article which I believe is somewhat amenable to Trump the platform says the crowd shouted over people who were yelling something we don't know what they were saying but they were shouting over them USA kind of makes it sound like that might have actually happened. That's the only reason that was included because there's an indication that there was something they were shouting over, worth knowing, at least including that for if and when.

Starting point is 00:44:18 And it says, that's all right. That that person is going home. This is what Trump said. That's all right. This person is going home to mom and going to be scolded because mom is voting for us. So your answer is to diminish the person, you know, and this is typically what they do. The same thing he said about people very early that if they don't believe, you're not MAGA, if you don't support me after the Epstein files. Well, you just literally cut off a huge portion of your core support because you said that.

Starting point is 00:44:45 And they keep, he keeps going, guys. You don't think there's reasons to be concerned? The answer is not to make fun of them and call them some mama's boy in their mom's basement. That's what they do to anybody who's challenging them at this point. Images on social media showed the hecklers being forcibly removed from the event. So that's interesting. You're not allowing them to speak freely. Isn't that intact on their free speech?

Starting point is 00:45:04 Or, you know, how are you look at this? They weren't breaking the law. They were simply present with things you didn't like and you kicked them out. that's very emblematic of where these people are mentally in the country. So here's the, what the image I use today. And it says, nothing sums up the dying maga movement better than a bunch of Trump supporters condemning a protester for speaking out against pedophiles. If that's actually what, you know, like I said.

Starting point is 00:45:24 And here's just the video. It's just the same thing. You can just see him standing in a crowd full of people. Interesting, right? He's not even saying anything. He's just pointing to his shirt. I mean, isn't that strange? like don't you this is what you would have called like democrat behavior by them from before you know

Starting point is 00:45:47 it's just it all it really shows you from my perspective is this is how partisans are team sport partisans people that are die hard for a team and you know it's not about the the reality of the actual policy it's just that we're on his team and you're on the other side and that includes anybody that's not a sport of trump and democrats and anybody else in the world is just everybody in trump it's just sad man and i really genuinely don't think that's the majority now i wanted to add to this too this is interesting to me. This is something I wrote in 2016, right after Trump was elected. Now, interestingly, with the image, which I'll just bring up here so you can see it in case you didn't see the, oh, actually, we just technically showed it, but this is the image from that rally, right?

Starting point is 00:46:28 And it was strange, by the way. I can't tell if this guy just like actually just kind of scared for, you know, because I don't know, he's an older guy, you know, what was happening or because somebody was about to jump on him. I don't know, but it just kind of an interesting picture, just chaos, right? And it, it rung, it, it made me think of this. You remember this? Same thing. You had these people at each other's throats because it's what they want from this stuff, guys. And what I titled this, it was titled the divide of the uninformed, the manipulation of a nation. Now, I'm not claiming everybody everywhere the voter for Trump was uninformed. That's not the point. If you read it, I'm talking about a specific demographic that were, it, that were, it's, you know, that were,

Starting point is 00:47:08 let's just say not politically active, people that were didn't care, weren't paying attention, whatever. And then suddenly this year, they turned it into sort of a reality show. And suddenly people just got super involved. And I argued that demographic, not everybody on Trump's side, but that specific demographic was a large addition to what was already happening. And I'm not even suggesting that this was a voting dynamic because you know I don't believe, or at least proof that that's how it translates. But really that it was just about creating some kind of a momentum to be used. So I want to read just a quick part of this. And this is just a same, I think the same thing right now with where we're going.

Starting point is 00:47:42 And again, 2016. And even since then, I think some of my opinions have changed or at least evolved, rather. This country is in the midst of a massive awakening. And the average person is being confronted with the choice. Address the looming dark realization that their reality is not what it seems or doubled down on the comforting lie and brace for the consequences. Now, that's what I argue was 2016, right? Going into the Trump election. We were seeing it, guys.

Starting point is 00:48:07 And what did Trump do? I'm the outsider. I'm going to bring all of them down. end the Fed, do all the things you all claimed about, conspiracy theories, lock her up. None of it. Same thing this time, by the way. But what happened was people chose to double down on the hope that he was different. And you know what?

Starting point is 00:48:24 I hope for it too. But I just didn't let that guy have my choices. And ultimately, I believe people saw it but chose to believe in him instead. It is a far easier path to stick with what's familiar, however sinister it may be. Despite the pressing feeling that they are being misinformed, all of us really, at least they can feel good about themselves, or so they're told to believe, right? So it's like, well, you're on the right team.

Starting point is 00:48:49 Just feel good about that. You're making the right choices, and they convince themselves that they're just on the right side. It has almost become another form of religion. Memorize these talking points, spread the talking points, and have faith that you're on the right side.

Starting point is 00:49:01 Now, this is specifically about the team sport politics people, and I don't believe that's the majority. I think it's a fringe, quite frankly, and then people that are stuck in the middle somehow. But that's what we see, don't we? either side of it, blind adherence to what they were taught. Jesse Waters in the view, whatever the equal stupidity of his, you know, the juvenile thing that he represents today. Because right now that's the upper focus when during COVID-19, it was more the other side.

Starting point is 00:49:24 But clearly, they're all doing the same stupid thing. Like, I'm sure you could make a Rachel Mata or Joe Scarborough or somebody like that. They just do the same things. They just parrot what they're told. What this has produced is an entire class of Americans who have been convinced that they are informed. In essence, that is what this past election was turned into, a crazy reality show. This was ingenious as those caught by these similarities between the two are slowly turned on to the new reality show, American politics. And this is not a new opinion, right?

Starting point is 00:49:56 There's a lot of us have talked about this over the years. This has awakened a dumb, sleeping giant waiting to be pointed in the right direction. These are the very same individuals screaming at rallies that Trump will end the world. Or conversely, yelling that we need to make them. America great again. And many of them believe that. Many of them still do. The point was that they let that be guided by him or anybody in the government. And I said, with no conception of how that is to be done or what it even means. In reality, they are simply parroting what they were told at their chosen pulpit and aggressively defending these falsehoods with no real understanding of the

Starting point is 00:50:31 surrounding dynamics and why they have the position they are claiming to hold. When confronted with contrasting information, like we were just talking about, even while attempting to have a civil conversation, these are the individuals who quickly get agitated and lash out, throwing out terms like un-American and conspiracy theorist. Either side, by the way, we literally just walked over that. These are the preconditioned responses to any idea that even slightly contradicts their treasured gospel of truth. That, guys, is all of this, including the idea of a different path, including, you know, you name it. A conclusion? And read the whole thing, guys, I think it's a good article. Whether one chooses to listen to the obviously biased mainstream media or an independent

Starting point is 00:51:10 source. Not following up that observation with research of one's own is not truly being informed, but just taking another's word for it. Should one really bank their future and the future of this country on the thoughts and potential ulterior motives of another? The only way to truly be informed is for one to take it upon themselves to not only research a topic they wish to understand, but to actually understand the topic and not just repeat what was last heard as one's personal opinion. And again, I'm not trying, this is not for everybody. This is for this, you know, who knows if they'll even hear it, if those are the people, but understanding that category person is what you see on all of these social media. And I argue it's a small percentage.

Starting point is 00:51:49 It's just being represented as the majority like they always do. And one of thought that I had earlier, by the way, before we get into the next topic is right now what we're seeing a lot of is this, you know, reactionary emotional response. And we've talked about this a lot over the years. It's important to think about. Like I said, you know, we've all been in those moments in our past where you hear a rumor and, you know, high school, whatever, and you react emotionally and you call and then you turn out, you, oh, it turns out to be fake. Whatever it is, whatever the dynamic. And you go back and say, I'm sorry, I reacted emotionally and I was wrong.

Starting point is 00:52:19 I'm sure we've all been there, right? The whole point is that emotions circumvent logic. You don't think they know that. So ultimately, they keep you in a heightened state of fighter flight, your cortisol level through the roof, you're emotional, you're angry, and it gets you to make emotional choices. And they keep you at that point, fever. pitch all the time. That's the point. So stop being reactive, being proactive, but stop reacting to what's in front of you. And it's for myself, too. We all do it sometimes. Something on,

Starting point is 00:52:46 you get angry and you go and you want to respond. And I make, I fall for it sometimes. We all have to try to check ourselves because when we react emotionally to what's shoved in front of us, especially by the power structure, guys, that is a gift, a gift to the control grid, to rather to the establishment, to the powers that shouldn't be because you can then be manipulated. and it's so prevalent today. So continuing and getting into the beef overlap, or excuse me, next one actually, in the conversation of the dad or Republican sort of leak pipeline,

Starting point is 00:53:15 which again, coming off the two-party illusion, coming off alternative ideas, we're talking about something that keeps people tapped in to whatever this broken thing is. And so this is actually a really interesting conversation. I first saw it from Gen X girl here, and this is, and I actually have, oops, I lose that real quick, there we go.

Starting point is 00:53:32 I don't know why they started doing this with the, they never used to do that. on Twitter, never mind for the podcast, this is the window, it's kind of movie or wonky, I guess, is that this is something that ultimately kind of broke down online, where you have this account that I wasn't really familiar with before this, but arguably a sort of like a data breakdown, you know, kind of of, you can look into it for yourself. The point was a group that has been kind of critical and called things out and like data and statistics, as I understand it anyway, and have a connection with people in the government. And what happened was they ultimately

Starting point is 00:54:02 got information and felt like they were being trapped and then went online, yelled about it. And then the undersecretary of state commented underneath this and said like, no, no, no, this is not a trap. We're just trying to get. And so you can decide what you think of this. What this shows you, whichever way this goes, is that there are people, and you could argue it's holdover Democrats, if that makes you feel better about it. I think it goes both ways clearly is you have people in the government right now who are

Starting point is 00:54:30 chosen by this administration who are trying to leak information out to people for them to put it out there as some bombshell story, knowing that it's a controlled leak as Trump is out there screaming about controlled leaks. So you can argue that she was the one that's being secretly doing that. I don't believe so. My gut tells me this is what they wanted. And now they're trying to cover this under something else. So I'll quickly read part of this. Then we'll come back to it. I'll read the article. Janice Carroll simply says, so let me get this straight. Marco Rubio's under Secretary of State, handed data Republican account, docs, approved for public release, so data Republican can pretend to expose corruption, but she thought it was a setup, the data

Starting point is 00:55:10 Republicans account. She says, I don't know what's worse. The fact that data Republicans is a fraud researcher who, in her opinion, and I agree, this clearly shows some kind of a weird thing, at the very least that they were open to just being handed things from a government that constant lies, so take it as you will, whether it's fraud or just a, you know, naivity. or again, actually just even say it more generally speaking, you know, maybe they are cognizant of this. And maybe that's why they posted this.

Starting point is 00:55:32 So however you want to frame it, go ahead. It's just simply the idea that they were willing to accept information from a government and then not really divulged that it was some kind of a pipeline where they were handed things, at least in this case, until after they thought they were being tricked. And it says, so they can pretend to expose corruption, but she thought it was a setup. So what's worse? The fact that they're fraud researcher who is fed stories by the government or that she thought it was. was a setup because the administration throws their people under the bus. So that's just the idea of it, is that ultimately they freaked out when online, like, they're trying to trick me.

Starting point is 00:56:04 And it's their administration. It's a Republican on their administration. And so it's interesting. And it's clear that we keep showing you how many people are being sold out and thrown to the bus. And so maybe she thought that's what was going to happen. Here's just the post. I'll come back in a second.

Starting point is 00:56:17 And now they've deleted this, by the way. This top one. It's not okay when the deep state sets you up to commit a crime. I've never been more angry in my life talking about the Trump administration, the State Department handing them information that they thought hadn't been redacted for them to put it out

Starting point is 00:56:32 and they'd be called a criminal. We'll go through it. Let the record be known that I did not name you, you named yourself. And that's the Undersecretary of State. You know, her name's right here. Where was it? Say it right.

Starting point is 00:56:46 Sarah B. Rogers. So you can see now they deleted these posts. Well, here's what she said. LOL. These are my text messages and documents. And that's this right here. I have the archive, by the way, so you can prove that this was what it said. And so as Janis Girl shared as well, here are the text messages. And that's the undersecretary of state. It already contends. So here's what it said. Just to be clear, you want me to leak that material? You gave me. Unredacted? Happy to help your efforts. So see, that's why I would agree. But I mean, to be objective, we don't know everything else. But I agree with Jen Knife. Like, this is clear that you're not going to, you're not going to. to divulge that, obviously. And it says it already contains all necessary redactions, meaning no more redactions needed. And it says, if you'd rather report on already open source stuff, that's fine too. But I wanted to give you the option of breaking the story as a sort of a gift. In fact, quick deviation. I won't play the whole thing. This is exactly what this is and is still

Starting point is 00:57:45 happening to this very day. Well, one of the four principal functions of the CIA is to gather intelligence and ideally forward it to the president, the users of information, the policymakers, as they say. There are other functions, however, some of them more legitimate than others. One is to run secret wars, the covert action that's written and talked about so much, like what's happening in Nicaragua today from Honduras. Another thing is to disseminate propaganda to influence people's minds, and this is a major function of the CIA. and unfortunately of course it overlaps into the gathering of information you have

Starting point is 00:58:27 contact with a journalist you will give him true stories you'll get information from him you'll also give him false stories did you buy his confidence with true stories you buys confidence and set him up we've seen this happen and recently with jack anderson for example who has his intelligence sources and he is also that's so weird and only on my computer and it goes it goes on and the point is clear right sometimes you get actual information right Alex Jones will know all about that plenty of others when they all know about that and including how they were played to put out false information so in this case it's interesting to see this back and forth right of the actual text or actual exchange saying oh i'm just going to give you

Starting point is 00:59:10 this breaking story for a gift now who knows that you know the point was that who know i mean it's not even getting into accuracy or not at this point but if you're in this position and there's dumping things in front of you. It's, I mean, it's like asking Grock and accepting it at face value without looking into it. You know, it's, and they will manipulate you. That is what these people do, in my opinion. So let's read this article first. We'll come back to this.

Starting point is 00:59:32 Alternet, put this out. Trump official goes damage control after her leaks go to MAGA, go sideways. A Trump official is trying to laugh off the suggestion. Now, by the way, they frame, I believe this is somewhat partisan. I haven't checked this platform in a while. I just first I saw on this. But they frame it as Q out on account. Again, I'm not very familiar with that or Republicans.

Starting point is 00:59:51 That doesn't seem like the case. Maybe it was before. Who knows? Just understand that that's what they frame it as. And Trump officials trying to laugh off the suggestion that she fed information to a Q on account that could land the owner in court. It says, it's not okay when the deep state tries to set you up and commit a crime. I've never been more in my life, as we just read.

Starting point is 01:00:10 And it says, I walked in with good faith, ready to collaborate on Cuba. Think about Nick Shirley here, guys. Plenty people have making these points. got shoved a bunch of hard copy documents to leak, didn't check them before accepting, gave a non-committal answer, yep, markings that would have gotten me in big, big trouble. So is he being set up, or she being set up?

Starting point is 01:00:33 Are they just trying to keep this like fake pipeline of fake reporting of new media manipulators so they can mislead them when they want to and the naivity that is overflowing for people like Nick Shirley? They clearly just go along with the team. I mean, this is what we're seeing. And I believe that's exactly what just happened in regard to all these. I mean, there's so many examples we could get into.

Starting point is 01:00:55 But so this is about kind of the upcoming narrative here. And it says, I consulted people. And if this were a sanctioned leak, they would have just sent over email. They tried to entrap me. And so what's important is right now it seems like they don't think that anymore, as we'll get into. Or at least they deleted the originals, which suggests that they're trying to walk that back. and he did follow up with a comment, or she, here we go, about following up. We'll come back to that a second.

Starting point is 01:01:25 It says, while the information in the documents themselves were nothing burgers, according to an ex account, Twitter, the poster claimed that the information tried to get me to commit a crime, simply meaning that there are things that should have been redacted that could have been used to argue you put out sensitive information. That seems to be like the go-to, Bolton, anybody. You didn't do this or, you know, you didn't classify right things, or you took personal information or you tried to not a FOIA exchange. These people are all like murderers. You're like slapping them on the wrist for hiding a document, you know, which good. They're criminals. But

Starting point is 01:01:57 we need to see how easily and how consistent it is. They go with this low level thing so they can go five years and millions of dollars and then go, oh, well, they admitted it. So slap on the wrist, go home. It's a cycle, guys. That's what I believe anyway. Now it says, no, I did not fall for your trap. It says, and this is comments, people saying, why would you ask that are Republicans in response to the undersecretary to leak documents that you could have just released yourself. This isn't adding up. Why? Obviously, it's clear because they don't want to be seen to be putting it out.

Starting point is 01:02:26 They want it to look like organic reporting. That's very dishonest. And it's commonplace, guys, left and right. My question, they go on, another person, is if y'all are on the same side, why is this social media and not discussion in private? Very good point. Another Trump's supporting account posted. Well, obviously, because data, Republican.

Starting point is 01:02:45 thought they were being set up by their own team. Or at the very least, if they now want to make it sound like a Democrat holdover or whatever, but at the time, it's hard to see it that way. Do you always trade info of our United States government as gifts to your colleagues? And do your colleagues? This is a very, very, very exposing moment.

Starting point is 01:03:05 They're trying to pass off as just a casual thing. Now, why she responded? It's hard to say. Maybe she thought she was tagged, right? I mean, the incompetence level is through the roof. It wouldn't surprise me. These are my text message and documents. The markings are FOIA redactions required even for voluntary disclosure.

Starting point is 01:03:25 To prove this isn't a trap, I'll happily disclose the documents myself. Here they are. Well, I don't see them. Oh, here we go. Or no? This is just screenshots? Of course they're screenshots. All a lot of Twitter files, ladies and gentlemen.

Starting point is 01:03:37 Here's all the files that I can just give you screenshots of. Cool. Crazy. Now, Janice girl goes on to say, I've been saying data Republican is fraud. She says, data Republican says I see Israel ops everywhere because I have cognitive bias, you know, attacking her for basically acknowledging the obvious Israel infiltration.

Starting point is 01:03:57 And Janek's here goes on to say, get her fired from, and this is, well, first of all, the, I didn't see that one, actually. Oh, interesting. Okay, so this is a different one. I thought the same one. So it says, to those who, to those all who are convincing me that I'm acting on a misunderstanding, I guess before that the one I'm going to show you next about admitting that they might have been mistaken,

Starting point is 01:04:17 and she knew my background. She knew the markings that would get me in trouble. She confirmed she'd made all the redactions necessary. The leaks given to me were of zero operational value. It's one thing to try and get me fired. It's another to try to get me to commit a crime. And look, that framing, it sounds hard not to see it that way. Who knows why they decided to go back.

Starting point is 01:04:37 But clearly, this could have been an effort to try to set them up for some reason. Because what else does this make? Why would you give them non-important information that had things that might that should have been, I mean, it does seem to be very suspicious. And you could also look at it like somebody trying to frame a Republican for doing so, right? I mean, who knows? Question everything.

Starting point is 01:04:55 And so, someone reprimanded her and the post got deleted. And so that's the one I was going to show next right here. Yeah, it says the post, this, I posted this week for a place of stress. And I said more faster, actually technically let's read this first. I'm kind of jumping around here. The full thing simply says, it is not okay when the deep state sets you up to commit a crime. never been more angry in my life. You read that already. And I read this a part of it, I think. Walked in with good faith, ready to collaborate on Cuba. Got shoved a bunch of hard copy documents

Starting point is 01:05:23 to leak, didn't check them before accepting, non-companel-lancer. You already read that as well. Goes on to say, the markings weren't crossed out. I consulted people. And if this were the sanctioned leak, they would have just sent an email. They tried to entrap me. The actual documents are nothing. I guess we did read all that on the kind of in the article. No, I didn't fall for your trap. And so clearly on the record, whether they deleted or not, They were, she responded to it and said, I'm not falling for your trap. Interesting. So, posted this from a place of stress.

Starting point is 01:05:53 And I said more faster and louder than the moment called for. I don't regret caring about doing things the right way. I do regret making a public spectacle before it was understood. And pulling people I respect into a swirl that is part on me. Okay. So an alternative other, another theory is simply that as Jennex points out that so many people on their side are being sold out by their team that they, that she just thought that was happening to her. And now maybe they're trying to reframe it as the Democrat. I mean, I'll show you

Starting point is 01:06:19 some of those posts underneath it in a second. She's, I'm deleting the threads, going to step back and let this be handled the way it should be. Thank you to the ones who checked in quality. Now, think about the idea that you have the undersecretary of the state department leaking what they would argue is important data to this person, and that's the way they respond. I'm being set out by the deep state. It just kind of goes, even though that's not something you should diminish guys, just being set up by the government. But think about that's the kind of people they're working with. I just think that's very, very telling. And whether it's a lack of, you know,

Starting point is 01:06:49 the level of incompetence or that they're trying to aim for that, I don't know. Maybe we're being destroyed by something else. And I guess we can all go back to consulting, consuming the deep state curated BS, posted, deleted, and data Republican and Sarah will be hugging soon. Right? And there's more threads here, which I'll come back to in a second

Starting point is 01:07:05 that go over a point to connection next surely. Again, archives included. Here's her actual post beneath it. Now here is another Trump supporter saying, Stephen Miller, we have a traitor in the house. You see how this always goes. Why would it, why would it be like, okay, so this is somebody who's literally under Rubio, one of the most powerful people in this government with multiple high level positions. Trump pointed him, Trump supports their actions, and you now go, traitor, why wouldn't your first thought be like,

Starting point is 01:07:36 why is Trump's administration trying to do this to this person? Because the assumption is always not the team. It has to be a traitor, Democrat, somebody else being set up. It's, always the mindset either side of the team sport partisans because it can't be my team my team's the best stephen miller the most seriously i mean based on his actions but just my gut that is one of the most dangerous people in this government stephen miller is a sociopath and it's obvious in the way he just i mean you can watch him do these interviews and it's almost like he's half about to laugh the whole time like he's kind of trolling but knows he's pushing the envelope because he constantly does. He says things way beyond what others will. And it's obvious he's trying to push that

Starting point is 01:08:18 needle. The guy is dangerous. And he is a, he does not believe in what you guys believe. That has to be clear by now. On top of that, the other one, Gina Milan, another one of these fake, you know, this account, just go ahead and laugh if you want to go or go through it. If you want to have a good laugh about the blind partisan player, get rid of this snake, Rubio. You mean the one that he put there? Like, so now, even if it is a snake, why wouldn't that be his fault? Because not my team. We're the best. Democrats are the same. You know, that's the only thing you get in this childish game. Adrian Cross then points to the one we read. I'm deleting the threads and says, So you publicly cried murder on Twitter before you understood the assignment, then drag the entire Twitter cult conglomerate,

Starting point is 01:09:02 who held your hand and used you as their pawn, then built an entire bat, S-H-I-T-crazy-n narrative around it, heavily relying on your large amplified Twitter followers and your most trusted minions subscriber cluster and here we are. You can't delete the thread. You can delete the thread all you want, but it doesn't delete the crash out. Even your, oops, even your heavily AI, heavy AI use couldn't save you this time. You should have joined the wine moms and playing, you know, making fun of it, really. So I'm not familiar with this county either. I fall. Actually, I think I've fallen for something else. I don't remember why. Either case, I'm not, I can't speak to what he does in general. And the point would be that he's simply calling them out. So who knows what it's dry.

Starting point is 01:09:38 from, but ultimately it is a weird thing and it does speak to, you know, immaturity, I guess, and competence. I mean, the fact that you would freak out about that without understanding what actually happened or knowing the details just because, I mean, against your own team. I mean, look at it this way. You work at a massive company, right? And all of a sudden, you get a notice about something that is, you know, off or whatever. It's just the same circumstance, rather.

Starting point is 01:10:03 And you just, instead of going and going, hey, wait a minute, like this is crazy. Like, is this wrong? is this supposed to be a mistake? You just put out a massive memo to everybody in the company and say, the president's trying to trap me. The CEO is trying to get me arrested. What do you think is going to happen? Without the information, it's just crazy.

Starting point is 01:10:20 It's a weird way to go about this. I agree with Jennex. I think she thought she was being set up by her own team. And now they're trying to cover that up. You can decide for yourself. But it shows you a larger pipeline, guys. This is how they operate, the entire thing. Eric simply goes, the real story here is that data Republican inadvertently.

Starting point is 01:10:37 just exposed how Nick Shirley got this riveting Minnesota fraud story out of nowhere. I agree. And she does have a pretty good thread here breaking it down. Worth going through. Oh, actually, it's this one right here, I think. Yeah, it's the next one here. And it basically goes over the whole breakdown, you know, of the ready to go to collaborate on Cuba and the information he got and Nick Shirley's currently now in Cuba. Like, they're all just being led along, guys. Like, it's a clear thing. And it says here they don't want to look like it's actually coming from the White House. You know what I mean? I mean, it worked out for them and Nick Shirley, which was an actual text exchange.

Starting point is 01:11:11 I just, guys, I think you already know. And there are people that fall for it. But the truth is that most people are starting to be attuned to this. And now what you're going to get are people trying to get you in another direction. The new party, the next president, like it's just, we got to be paying attention. Don't lose sight of all of this because it's not changing because they put a new flashy toy in front of you. Now, in regard to the meat conversation, which we also discussed, this is just kind of funny,

Starting point is 01:11:35 actually. And it still to me does speak to the two-party side of this and what we're discussing about the false kind of artificial nature of this. But what's interesting is that we were talking about this, just as a disgusting story in its own right, that the Bureau of Land Management, who I argue is an unconstitutional thing in its own right, is in charge of protecting what I didn't know is only 73,000 or so wild horses in existence in wild horses, rather, in the West. That's 73,000. Now, that's not like a species going extinct. There's horses all over the place.

Starting point is 01:12:11 But we're talking about a wild-hacked natural horse environment. Some people may not care about that. Clearly, Trump does not. But it matters, I think, to people, like, ultimately that it's, what you're doing is, these are living creatures. Let's put it that way. And the idea that you're simply just murdering them for a money, a profit in the moment, it's just disgusting.

Starting point is 01:12:30 No matter what you're aiming at. And so the point was, they're going to murder, killing these horses and selling them to get butchered. That's what it's in. $750 a wild horse. Do the math on that. 73,000 horses, $750. That's that's pennies in what they're actually dealing with. So my thought was that's not the truth. They're not trying to make, you know, however much money, do the math on your own. The idea being that ultimately they're spending billions, if not trillions, and we're going to sell $750 a horse. Nah, there's something else going on. At the very least is for the land or data centers. But my joke, and maybe not a joke, was, you know, I remember yesterday I was going

Starting point is 01:13:10 over this and I basically was talking about the meat story. And I was like in a totally unrelated story, horse meat, you know, it's just basically joking, but it did stand out to me as a weird time overlap, but I don't know. You know, it was a joke. But then today, all of a sudden, it's all over the place. And it's certainly possible that we all just came to the same conclusion. But who knows, guys? Maybe we're reaching, you know, the T-Lav has this effect. on the conversation more than they allow us to see. I really do think that, by the way. But so Z Media comes out today and says

Starting point is 01:13:39 in regard to Trump's post, which weirdly does say the U.S. will allow, and this is what we're going to talk about next, 300,000 metric tons of product for ground beef. So while we'd say beef, I agree, it's a weird way to frame that. What exactly is product for ground beef?

Starting point is 01:13:56 When I simply just asked, I said, horse meat, anyone posted that. Just make a kind of the joke, but no, maybe not at this point, right? And what's funny is, oh, I think I have right here. Now people are posting this, and this is after my show. Do not eat Trump beef, a picture of a horse. And look around.

Starting point is 01:14:13 It's a kind of a beginning to trend topic. Like, it's interesting. And I think that's pretty cool that I think we all had an effect on that, but ultimately that people are questioning the overlap. Not assuming we shouldn't assume because who knows, maybe that's not the case. Likely don't think it is. But overall, what he's doing to get into the crux of the point

Starting point is 01:14:31 is according to other than like, again, blind MAGA supporting ranchers that say this is what we all need and maybe they're right. But from what I can tell, the vast majority of people who are in this field are saying this is the worst thing he could do, it benefits his momentary, you know, appearance and hurts the industry he claims he's trying to help in regard to the ranching side of it. Oklahoma Cattlemen's Association says President Trump's deal allowing additional foreign ground beef imports is bad for Oklahoma ranchers and should be rescinded. Now, Trump is now basically saying he's going to allow that meat, reduce the tariffs because the price are too high, as we just talked about yesterday, very clearly proving what you all should already have known, which is that tariffs immediately directly end up falling into your lap. And he lied and said fake news, Democrats lie, and then goes, we'll take away the tariffs to lower the price. Boom, there you go, which you should have already known. You didn't need the mainstream to point out that connection.

Starting point is 01:15:23 It's obvious if you understand how it works. They put tariffs on it. They raise the prices. You pay more. And then, of course, the way it worked out this time is they end up giving refunds back to the companies who already raise the prices and then they keep the prices the same. Yeah, it all works out for everybody except the American people. Now, for the cattlemen. So now he's doing this and importing something, some mysterious meat from somewhere that he refuses to say where it's from, which is pretty damn weird.

Starting point is 01:15:46 The growth will take care of that very easily. It's a $700. Which deal? The beef deal. I don't want to say which countries, but there are a few countries. but they're going to be sending in the highest quality beef. Sure. So that he said that so clearly makes me think it's the exact opposite.

Starting point is 01:16:09 Typical Trump, could be wrong. But I don't want to say. Now, of course, you could argue it's because there's a deal ongoing or he's trying to maneuver some kind of a deal. Who knows, who knows, certainly possible. He does know how to manipulate people, very, very, you know, I don't know, dishonestly. He's good at that.

Starting point is 01:16:25 Playing people and manipulating, you know, the way he does deals. But so what's clear is that people are in agreement as far as, I can tell broadly that this is going to only hurt the industry. Here's another. This is from the American conservative. And I keep pointing this out, guys. If you're paying attention, it's clear that the people are starting to turn. And I think it was clear months and months and months ago.

Starting point is 01:16:45 This is the opposite of what needs to happen. He says, a cattle rancher unhappy with Trump. Well, let's talk about it real quick. Right out of the gate this morning, we've got an announcement from the administration about, you know, cattle, beef prices. they're going to import a bunch more box beef, ground beef, scrap cuts, what I call them, and hopefully bring down the price of ground beef in the store for y'all. We've seen a market crash for live cattle, live cattle that people like myself grow

Starting point is 01:17:27 and take to the processing plants or go down through the system. that's dropped 40 cents a pound already just from that plant closure now this morning the markets are crashing but will your price change so far we have not seen that i argue it will not just like i said yesterday it could but there's many factors involved here one you know if this even happens the way he says it does but they argue is the 25% cheaper well that's no there's no guarantee i mean guys first of all, he doesn't even have that power. They could agree all they want and go out and sell it for whatever they want. I mean, they would all scream socialism, but Biden did the same thing.

Starting point is 01:18:10 The point is clearly that he's saying this, as he said, a lot of things that don't come to pass. And ultimate will come out and it'll be more expensive and they'll say, do it for the team. You know, it's good beef and it's extra quality. So what are you bagging? What are you crying about? You know, the same kind of thing. People complaining about gas prices are now not MAGA, even though he swore that wouldn't happen. You know, you go down the damn list.

Starting point is 01:18:29 It's obvious to anybody paying attention. And so he's simply highlighting that this is not where it's going. It's not what it currently shows. I think we're being played, not even getting into where it might be coming from, which is next. We have not seen that. And at what expense to you? I'll tell you what expense to you. This is the opposite of what needs to happen.

Starting point is 01:18:50 We're not going to retain heifers and build a herd when we can have, you know, the stroke of a pin drop our price to where we. don't make a profit anymore. And honestly, that's where we stand. We finally begun to make a profit and all hell breaks loose. People can't handle it, you know, I guess because beef is high in the store. I get it. Beef is high in the store. Look at what else is high in the store.

Starting point is 01:19:22 Look at what's high for the rancher and the- Everything. That's the point. It's because of our government's actions. And yeah, right now primarily what Trump is doing, but Biden did plenty of things that added to this as well. And if we were in the beginning of in the middle of his administration, I would be pointing largely to what he did. But right now, it's clearly what Trump is currently doing that is actively guiding this direction. Just be clear that it's not one side only, but that's

Starting point is 01:19:47 currently large, like the reality of the war and plenty of other factors, guys. It's, it's, you know, really just, I mean, you could argue simply just a benefit, you know, the, trying to gaslight you into thinking their mistakes or your benefit. But overall, there's a still that conversation to be had about whether there's supply chain energy transitions that are happening because of all of this. And as much as I still don't see that materializing the way that I expected, it's something we need to not forget about because it is a point. I mean, things are changing. Whether it changes in a way that is what we expected, things are changing because of how long this has happened, which is what we all expected, and we should be asking whether

Starting point is 01:20:23 they did that on purpose. As some people are arguing in the very beginning. producer fuel land labor all of it you know you got a nine dollar latte but seven eight nine dollars a pound for ground beef is too much right now you're going to get stuck with shitty ground beef trust me and we won't rebuild the herd and you're going to lose more ranchers and in the long run you're going to lose everything because where there are cattle, there is freedom. And when these disappear, so does your freedom. I don't think this is going to work out like they hoped. And of course, you know, since Donald Trump is so buddy, with Bill Gates right now, despite all the people that lie about that, maybe we're going to get some kind of fake meat push. Maybe that's exactly what this amounts to. I mean, I didn't even include that in this today because honestly, it feels like the most unlikely, but I didn't expect Stargate day one either. So maybe that literally becomes the direction. And you get the even more fake maga going

Starting point is 01:21:30 saying, yay, fake meat, Bill Gates will save the day. Hashtag maga, who knows? I doubt it. It's more of a joke. But the truth is, it's one of the many possibilities out there. Or it's a combination of all of it as Trump does anything you can to get one small win as he's failing. Thomas Massey calls it out and says, hey, Grock, how many tons of ground beef does Trump say he will import over 90 days at 25% below market price? And how many tons of ground beef do McDonald's, Wendy's, and Burger King chains use collectively in the course of 90 days? could this be considered a fast food bailout?

Starting point is 01:22:02 Think about that. Hiding another action that would be overlapping with what they claim Biden does, or just all of our government being corrupt and doing it for their own purposes. And this is Hannibal 909 saying this is a stealth bailout for meat companies, $555 million, stealth subsidy to the multinational beefpacking industry in fast food lobby. You know, he loves his fast food, doesn't he? Hashtag Maha. administration is waiving $500, $554.4 million in tariffs to funnel cheap frozen beef to McDonald's,

Starting point is 01:22:36 Wendy's Burger King, not to lower the price of ground beef at your grocery stores. Interesting. So if and when this comes to pass very soon that ultimately this is, you know, at the very least, it does not really change the price. I believe they're right. The numbers line up. And there's more that you can read for yourself. But this is kind of one of those, in my opinion, we'll have to see how it plans out. But guys, it seems pretty obvious. Now here is an article from MTN and says, Mystery Meat. Trump refuses to say where his new food flood of foreign beef is coming from. August 21st, hundreds of thousands of metric tons of foreign ground beef at prices dramatically below the current market. But when a reporter asked the most basic question, where does it come

Starting point is 01:23:18 from? Trump refused to say. On the beef deal, which countries did you make the deal with? I don't want to say. And it says, welcome to Trump's mystery meet deal. Trump. Trump is announced on true social that for the next 90 days, the United States would allow 300,000 metric tons of imported product for ground beef, weird, into the country without the usual out-of-quote-of-tariff. Flooding the market with government subsidized below-market beef is not the way to rebuild America's cattle herd, said NCBA CEO, Colin Woodall. The organization said cattle markets had already turned sharply lower just because of his announcement, demonstrating the opposite of what he says will happen. Because that's the whole, this is, if you really do your due diligence,

Starting point is 01:23:56 it seems most of the people in industry are like, you were going to destroy this by this action. So think about the few out there saying the opposite. If it turns out that they're right, praise them for that. Being the brave ones to say it when nobody else knows, because this is their field. You know, none of us truly understand the inner workings outside of people to do what I argue. But if it doesn't turn out that way, and it turns out that these guys are correct, then you need to reflect on those people and why they would lie about their own industry to promote a team of politics. Cattle futures fell to eight-month lows following Trump's recent announcement. That's crazy. The backlash is hardly the first time Trump has angered American ranchers.

Starting point is 01:24:29 That's true. We've already talked about it by proposing foreign beef imports as quick fix for grocery prices. What is it? Texas Slim from the beef initiative, I believe, Steve has talked about a lot. We're calling him out for the same thing. And they were supportive of the team, or rather just of Trump in the beginning and ultimately realized this was going to be bad for their industry when they thought he was fighting for the people, right? And so just, and this has been happening the whole time. It's like the NRA or rather the, you know, was it the gun owners and America calling out Trump and Bondi for their anti-second amendment stance. You know, these things all fall under the radar for a lot of people that just don't want to see what these people really are. In October 2025, Trump publicly floated importing more beef from Argentina as a way to

Starting point is 01:25:14 bring down American beef prices. We would buy some beef from Argentina, cattle, American cattle producers, were furious. Same reasons. Two days later, after Trump announced plans to increase Argentine imports, the organization escalated its criticism. Now, the United States, Catalan's association, sounded a similar alarm warning Trump that expanding Argentine beef imports could threaten their producers. Domestic. In February, Trump authorized an additional 80,000 metric tons in February of Argentine lean beef imports for 2026. It's almost like this has been organized to just distributed through four quarterly trenches. Tranchus, excuse me.

Starting point is 01:25:53 Now, what I find really relevant about this is where this is going from, you know, before. Now, as I played for you just now, he's saying we don't know, but Department of the deportation say, it's going to be Argentine beef that was just rejected by China, which was for being laced with neurotoxic and carcinogenic antibiotics. Guys, this is the most likely reality for me. That this is, because it's already been going on, and it's only going to end up more. And these are things that have already been shown to be problematic from a country that is absolutely floundering because of what they drove, because of Malay and their ridiculous

Starting point is 01:26:24 scams and crypto manipulations and, you know, chainsaws and then failure. That's what we're done. Have they sold you on the future? Because they guys aren't libertarian and they aren't anything they pretend to be. They're all as part of this new network state CEO-run country direction and they're trying to trick you into thinking that's what libertarianism is. Truth is guys that I believe this is where it goes, giving you terrible meat, you know, cheap, terrible, disgusting meat that's not about being healthy that gives them a benefit with

Starting point is 01:26:48 Argentina and gives them something. It's just not what you want. It's not what anybody expected, not what any Americans calling for. Definitely not the ranchers. And this is funny to me, but disgusting. Headquarters reports. This was on the 11th of August. 30,000 pounds of imported Rob B from Argentina has been recalled after failure to re-inspect following its arrival in the United States. This comes after USDA's food safety and inspection service lost 9% of its staff last year during the Trump administration's doge cuts and says, This was 10 days ago. Here's the article.

Starting point is 01:27:21 Nearly 30,000 pounds of Argentine beef sold in Texas recall by Miami area company. So clearly there's a problem here, guys, being turned back by China, being recalled in the United States. But yeah, let's just dump some Argentine beef because Trump needs a win. That is literally what I think is happening. But I guess we'll have to wait and see. But think about how disgusting this is that you're willing, after all the promises that you're willing to go into, you know, basically poisoning the American people so you can look like you're winning when you're out. actually double crossing the very industry you pretend you support. I mean, it just shows you everything about who these people are. Now, overlapping this with the idea of how those people set you up,

Starting point is 01:27:58 whether they're calling you an anarchist, you know, terrorist or, you know, domestic terrorist or anti-American anarchist, whatever. Because if you read their documentation, both Biden and Trump, they include those conversations. Anti-capitalism, anti-American, anarchy, very clearly. So what I thought was interesting is we put this out. We did the show yesterday discussing the title was the anarchism solution, Trump's Gavi lie, which, by the way, in case you didn't know, they unfrozen the 600 million for Gavi again, because they just love to fall through on their promises. No, clearly they'd love to double cross you all when you're not paying attention. FBI manufactures another plot and U.S. military censorship as stars and stripes,

Starting point is 01:28:35 censored and then remove their editor because they said censorship from the military was a red line for them. So they said, get out of here then. We want to be able to censor you because we think about free speech and democracy. No, they want to be like North Korea and all the It's just obvious. Anyway, back to the point. We talked about the FBI terror plot that they completely manufactured and then stopped. I mean, it's insane. We're going to go over it briefly in a second to give some updates, but the reality was they gave them everything. Like so many examples we'll show you next. The fake gun, the fake bomb, the car to drive their money to buy the tools. I mean, and then push them to do this. I mean, and nothing they didn't, it didn't happen because it

Starting point is 01:29:17 wasn't real. And now you charge them with material support for a terrorist group. And even though they were engaging the entire time with FBI agents pretending to be ISIS, literally none of this was even real. And so ultimately, even if she believed all these things, where's the crime if nothing was real? There wasn't a ISIS association. She wasn't supporting terrorism. She thought she might have been. And who knows, maybe she knew you were lying. Like, this is where I was talking about yesterday. It's not even trying to defend the person. Maybe she's psychotic and wants to kill people. The point is about understanding how easy it is to manipulate people like that,

Starting point is 01:29:49 and ultimately it might not be that case, as evidence by many of these other cases we've talked about. Now, what was interesting is I put this out because of that show, and it just got pretty good attention, at least for our platform, 10,000 views, 2.3,000 shares or likes and so on, which just shows you people are interested in this right now. And it was parents catch FBI and plot to force mentally ill son to be wrapping tears. Oh, look at that.

Starting point is 01:30:15 Funny how it just doesn't pop up all of a sudden. gotta love this platform. Here is a comment underneath this. Here's the actual article, by the way, or did I include it? Oh, no, it's just linked right here. But this is an important one. And it really is as crazy and it sounds. Now, ultimately what happened is they ended up driving his kids to go forward with this,

Starting point is 01:30:32 and they arrested him, even though the parents caught them in the midst of doing this. It's a crazy story, and it's all source. You can read it for yourself. And the kid is mentally challenged. I mean, they're literally aiming for people they can manipulate. Now, this is just a weird point. before we get into some of the other examples. This guy, who I'm not familiar with,

Starting point is 01:30:49 Chad Elwartowalski, says, if I had a rifle with a silencer and lots of ammo, I just don't know what I would do. The voices are telling me a Sigcross can fit in a tennis racket case should someone want to see what I would do if they brought one for me.

Starting point is 01:31:06 Doesn't that just seem incredibly suspicious? I mean, oh look, it could just be a guy who's losing his mind. And, of course, Joe here tags the FBI, which I guarantee they're going to get some of a follow-up. Maybe I just, my gut tells me this is for two reasons. To one, overlap with this. So people that are going, look, they're setting them up.

Starting point is 01:31:28 And they're simply, I mean, ideas simply to kind of overlap the idea of people talking about these things that's just unstable that you hate the government and you want to burn things down. Exactly what is not the case, at least with people we associate with. And I don't know. I just want to include that because I thought that was very strange. People that are liking it. I mean, it's just a weird thing.

Starting point is 01:31:45 would you even say something like that? I'll leave it there for you guys to think up for yourselves. I just think one thing that's happening in this platform that's worse than it's ever been is the social engineering, the algorithmic channeling and propaganda and fake movements. Like this is far more insidious than it's ever been. And guess what?

Starting point is 01:32:01 Censorship is still happening too. Maybe less than before. Hard to say. Even if it is, though, it's clearly alarming what's happening on this platform. But continuing on this very point, though, here's another example. And there's tons of it.

Starting point is 01:32:15 This isn't even all of them that we've covered. And you want to look at, I recommend again the free thought project because they've been doing this for a long time, specifically like this, you know, the cop watching overlap. 27, 2018, Rachel Blevins. It's strange, by the way, how many of these took place during Trump's first administration. Let that sink in. 2008, Rachel Blevins, after, and this is the free thought project, after FBI let Florida shooting happen, media now praising them for arming mentally ill man in fake attack. I'm not going to go into the details because time in general, but read these. It's absolutely crazy how common this is.

Starting point is 01:32:51 Here's one from 2017, right? Matt Agarist. Records reveal FBI gave man a rifle, urged him to carry out mass shootings to, quote, defend Islam. And one of the common threads is whether or not they even go through with it, they arrest them anyway and charge him with the crime. So, you know, how, so if they didn't even go through with it, and ultimately they end up going, I don't want to do that,

Starting point is 01:33:12 even if they agreed to before, but never broke the law. what if they were just gaslighting you because they wanted to talk to you, which is what many of these mentally challenged people are looking for just a friend, somebody who, and that's what they've done, like with that the first example or even the one I just showed you. It ends up being a kid who doesn't have many friends according to their parents, and these FBI agents siddle up next to them and say, hey, man, I want to be your friend.

Starting point is 01:33:33 Well, it's hanging out because of one comment you saw on his Twitter account. And then over the process of six months to a year, they basically coerce them to join. They go, look, I have a group that we like freedom. It's called ISIS. You want to join? You know, that's what I expect from these people. And historically, looking to the intercept, breaking this down. It's real, guys.

Starting point is 01:33:48 And they basically manipulate these people into feeling like they're part of a group. And then the next part you know. And you end up standing there with the, and all of a sudden you're being arrested. It's just insane. Now, yes, there are crazy people out there that are being arrested because they actually break the law. I'm not saying that's not the case.

Starting point is 01:34:05 But I want you to understand that the FBI is primarily in my experience out there trying to manufacture plots, historically speaking. You can disagree. I certainly could be wrong. The idea that's happening is enough. But if you really dive into the origins of the FBI, I mean, it's been an anti-American institution from the beginning. I've covered this a lot.

Starting point is 01:34:26 Mainstream media admits FBI groomed terrorist for Fourth of July attack. That's what I was just mentioning. Gave him supplies. 2018, Rachel Blevins. So why is it so many times during Trump's first administration that the FBI is trying to manufacture terror plots? When now it seems to be perfectly in line with his agenda with Israel. real. Seems relevant. Here is 2016. Orlando shooter. Remember, and we talk a lot about this one.

Starting point is 01:34:52 Deeper hidden ties to the FBI. This is John Rappaport. John Rappaport goes through this and breaks down the obvious ties. Here's what the FBI was doing instead of catching the Orlando shooter. This was Darius, what was it, Shatah Masibi? I forget how to pronounce his name. It was also the Free Thought Project. This was, or no, this was anti-media, actually. June 14th, 2016, or, Yeah, 16. And this one's an important one actually as well. It's, again, just, you know, basically manufacturing things. This is from 2017, Rachel Blevins, the Free Thought Project, three ways the New York City terrorist attack proves, but the war on terror is a failure and simply propaganda.

Starting point is 01:35:32 2017, Rachel Blevins, same thing. Evidence emerges showing FBI was behind the 2015 ISIS terror attack in Texas. This one is from 2017 as well, Rachel 11, three, the Free Thought Project. FBI interviewed New York City. city terrorist about his ties to terrorism before the attack. Now, that is near ubiquitous, by the way, and you know that too. This one, 2023. This one was Derek Brose. And this is for the Last America Vagabond. The FBI's entrapment of Americans continues with latest arrest of 18-year-old with developmental issues. It just doesn't stop, guys. These people are doing this on purpose. So they can appear, I mean, look at you take an already obvious problem that career people and the FBI have been

Starting point is 01:36:14 doing and then you let Cash Patel run it. And then you get a woman dressed in a burqa going through Home Depot. That's what you get. The most incompetent breakdown of what you might have argued was at least competent before, but still flimsy. But you get the Cash Patel, Dan Bongino version, and it's laughable. But that's where we are today. It's not, and weirdly continual, guys. I mean, these things happen during Biden's administration, too. Let's not pretend it's all of it. But it's interesting how this correlates with Trump's administrations. And I just want to add this to the end of it, actually. Maybe there's one more. This one here first. This is something

Starting point is 01:36:48 we've talked about recently, actually. Kind of separate, but this is 2016. FBI's outside party, that they didn't reveal at a time, revealed as Bureau angles to keep New Hack secret. But even this, by the way, doesn't really get into the whole picture.

Starting point is 01:37:05 Because it ultimately was revealed that it was Israel, right? And we just talked about this again, said recently. They were desperately trying to hide what this really was, and it didn't even fully come out then. Selbright, which we've talked about is clearly a part of this. But what it later developed into was the whole, basically what they're dealing with today.

Starting point is 01:37:22 The things ICE are using to get information out of your phone without you even opening it, that's what this was. An Israeli spyware tech that they used to hack into an F to a person's phone. And they hit it all from you because they knew it was an illegal, unconstitutional thing. And Israel's been guiding it the whole time. And at that point then, also you're getting infiltrated because that's always what they do.

Starting point is 01:37:43 but realize the spyware that Trump is welcome back into this administration, which we're going to talk about more in a second to, wherever that was, right? Meet the spyware companies that Trump's preparing to unleash during a second term. I mean, this is, you can see this thread that ties the direction together going back to, I mean, it's been being built around us for a long time. It's the best way to put that. So I just want to include that, seeing as how we were covering it all the way back then, too. And then generally speaking, 2024, I wrote there, this is one of the shows I did.

Starting point is 01:38:12 how Israel uses the U.S. two-party illusion to divide, destabilize, and control policy. That's what we've just been talking about, guys. And it's not just Israel, but just in regard to how clear that's a central problem for this country today, but you can argue any one of these other countries exploit the obvious whatever you want to call this. Divide and conquer or just the incompetence. I mean, or rather, let's not use the same word, just a, you know, clumsiness. Like the idea that they just are just stumbling through this because they want to enrich themselves

Starting point is 01:38:45 and we're so far past having a plan. Kind of feels that way today. But either way, it's clear that Israel and they publicly said this, Netanyahu's on video saying this, that they use the divide and our own politicians and competence to manipulate our policy, to bear that in mind. So speaking of this point as well before, the false flag conversation, here's the show, as we said, FBI manufacturers, another plot. I want to give you a quick update.

Starting point is 01:39:10 Jessica Bowie, or whatever the other name was, what the FBI complaint actually says. A couple points stand out to me. Bowie has no criminal record before this week. And local reporting says she's a mother. That, you know, doesn't mean she's not guilty, but it's an interesting thing to think about. So not only was this person like literally led and entrapped into this whole thing. Didn't actually break any real laws other than being told she was joining ISIS, being told she was going to be doing something with a bomb, being told she was going to use it,

Starting point is 01:39:39 none of which were active or real. I think that matters. But either way, that that's a person that's never once broken the law, not a single criminal record. I mean, and suddenly she wants to blow buildings up? I mean, guys, that just does not ring true to me. But who knows? Social engineering, neuro weapons, you know, whatever else.

Starting point is 01:39:59 Or just, you know, she's on antidepressants or whatever, godforsaken pharmaceuticals. They're jumping down everybody's throats. And she has a break. However you want to look at it, that just doesn't line up for me, not in a real sense. Bowie made her first court appearance Thursday. Think about that.

Starting point is 01:40:14 We can't get these people in court that we, like these major stories, Robinson, whatever else. Think how long they drag these things out and boom, Thursday in court. It was already halfway through. Why? What's the difference here? Because I feel like this is my opinion. This is important for their agenda. They want you looking at this.

Starting point is 01:40:32 That one they want you to forget about. It goes on to say, in appearance Thursday in the Northern District of New York, in a single charge, one charge of attempting to provide, attempting to provide, that's the point, material support to a foreign terrorist group that, by the way, wasn't involved. Explain for me, and you know why they don't charge her with terrorist attacks because nothing actually happened. Good luck trying to sell them on an actual attack when the attack wasn't real, when there wasn't any risk. Just because she thought she was doing that, this is where you get into proving that she thought that. What if she comes in and it goes, I never thought that. I knew it was fake. I was tricking them.

Starting point is 01:41:08 No, the judge could decide, but ultimately, how do you prove that that's what her intent was? You see, this is an intent becomes a very difficulty to prove in court, in many cases anyway. And so here, attempting to provide material support. So you have FBI agents, which is what the case was. The FBI had been watching her for weeks, according to the complaint. She spent that time with people she believed were ISIS, but who were really FBI agents in Burkas or whatever you want to tell it. And so how are you giving a material support for a terrorist court?

Starting point is 01:41:38 group when you're actually standing with FBI agents. So attempting to provide it, your argument would be attempting to provide material support for a group she thought was ISIS. I just find this to be absurd on its face. And I think that was it. I just owe in this one part, this part two. What happens next? Attorney of information for her was not immediately available.

Starting point is 01:41:59 I find odd. And it's not yet clear how she intends to plead. What? So this is where it's interesting. Now, in any case, when you're in court, people who are guilty pleading us in all the time are not guilty and they try to fight the case, you know, but that they, when you don't plea, you're like the part with Robinson that we didn't even get to hear it for such a long, there's something suspicious here. And don't forget what cash has already been wrapped up in, the Halloween FBI terror plot that wasn't anything of the kind. He screamed about how a big terror plot that actually ended up being nothing like that. In fact, the people they were trying to connect through with all the Antifa groups, it all fell on its face. On top of any number of, are the things he tried to boast about. The bullets with the weird writing on the ground, all these things they basically manufactured.

Starting point is 01:42:42 The charge is an allegation, don't forget, Bowie has not been convicted, and prosecutors still have to prove their case in court. Clearly, that is worth reminding everybody, seeing how in the partisan game, these people are guilty already the moment their pictures posted. And here is Jay, not familiar,

Starting point is 01:42:59 200 or, excuse me, that's a different person, 52,000 followers, Patriot with a flag, three-time Trump voter. Very proud of it. that. It says, we got white B-I-T-C-Hs. That's what he says. Very classy. Pleading O.L. Allegiance to ISIS, according to FBI documents. Let's trust them without knowing. That's smart, smart stuff. Changing their names from Jessica to, what is it, Aisha Saif, plotting to blow up state capitals in the name of Allah. He goes, yet people want to cry and moan about Israel influence. What? Like,

Starting point is 01:43:30 both things can't exist at the same time? What is it wrong with these people? And it says, yeah, the threat from Islam is here. You mean this white, woman in the United States wearing a burqa that the FBI convinced her to put on? I mean, how stupid people can be? And this represents Islam influence? What is, I mean, I just can't get past the stupidity that exists on some of these platforms. But overall, you realize you're talking about the FBI, have you spoken to her? What is she claiming? You just, I mean, these are the people that are fighting the deep state and you're just parroting what the state says without any due diligence or understanding of what happens next. My God. But overall, it's just team support in my opinion.

Starting point is 01:44:06 that's what they get off. I'd rather get, get, they benefit from. Now, this is important to think about. Ultimately, the picture,

Starting point is 01:44:16 right, of the burqa and what she's wearing. And yesterday, I went over the fact that there's Jewish women in Israel that were the exact same thing, despite how every time it comes to, that's not true.

Starting point is 01:44:25 It's very much true. I could bring up the forward article yet again, but who cares? Because people are going to deny what they want. It's obvious and proven. It's the one Tommy Robinson was pointing to pretending it was Muslims.

Starting point is 01:44:35 And there's no place for this. And then it was like, I posted me going, well, are you going to keep saying that when you realize these are Jewish women in Israel? And nobody cares because he's allowed to say to about Muslims, even if you're wrong about it, the picture shows. Either way, the idea here is that this very well could be something other than what it looks like. Now, whether or not she is something other than what she looks like or she's been played by the FBI,

Starting point is 01:44:58 the point is, why would this immediately represent Muslim influence opposed to somebody wanting you to think that? And the same with the other such other in reverse. how do we not know that the Israel influences some kind of Arab country in disguise? We should always question all of these things. Now, clearly one has far more prevalence than the other, but you should always question it. So I want to briefly point out exactly what that's called. I actually don't know how to pronounce this exactly.

Starting point is 01:45:25 It looks like, oh, it's weird. Even the, even the phonic is a, it's Mustabri bin, Mustah Reveem, something like that. Basically what it means is, in actual translation, he who has become, Arab. It is the name given to certain units in the IDF or any number of variations of their enforcement, police, border patrol, who assimilate secretly into Arab populations, dressing like Arabs assassinations. We saw it when they did the hospital during the Gaza genocide that's still going on and then murder people right in their beds. And I guess that was called heroism by the ridiculous media, even though it was women and children and, you know, pager attacks or completely not

Starting point is 01:46:05 terrorism, disgusting what they do. But the point is, the prevalent, the, not the prevalence, but how many times in history that it's happened that, authority in Israel dress up like Arabs and carry out attacks? King David Hotel is very, it's ridiculous, how often it happens. And so every time we see something like that, we should be wondering whether that's part of it.

Starting point is 01:46:28 But not assuming that either. So here is just a couple of articles. That's the same term. written differently, the Israeli undercover agents with a history of dressing like Palestinians. Now, realize, many times like these things have happened and they dressed up like Arabs and then the reports become Muslim's attack. And it's been later proven they were Israeli. Here is this is Israeli Nation News, soldiers dressed as Arabs collected information about hostages. Here is Horretz. IDF declassifies docs in still rotten Levan affair.

Starting point is 01:47:00 Another example of a false flag scandal where they pretended to be somebody else. Here is a good breakdown from Sean King, the North Star with John King, Israel's history of false flags, assassinations, massacres, blame shifted to Arabs and Muslims. You know, there's a lot of good stuff in here, but one of the main ones, the King David Hotel bombing, which he's right about. Most Americans don't even know about this, or even the U.S. is liberty, for that matter. They literally dressed up like Arab workers and went in and carried out a false flag. It's very documented. And we're talking about the Ergun, the earlier menachim Began and all these are the early elements of Zionism.

Starting point is 01:47:34 And here's Al Jazeera journalism review. This is a different overlap on December 2024. Fake accounts with air faces. The virtual digital version, a well-organized cyber army, we know this is happening. Just realize how common this is and how many examples we could have outlined. And so asking yourself if that's what that represented or something else. So on the carryover from that, talking about Israel infiltration, let's talk about the border and the control grid being built around us. Starting with this video, interesting this video, because it's not new. This is happening.

Starting point is 01:48:08 Now, this is specifically about the idea of whether or not you criticized Israel and having the U.S. government stop you at the border as an American and say, we need to look at your phone because you tweeted things about Israel. That's not a joke. We've even seen videos of FBI and other like ice elements going to people's homes and saying, well, we just want to check on you because you wrote things about Israel. It's not a joke. The video's been around. It's happened many times. We have people like Abbott in Texas who force you to sign. documents that say you won't talk about Israel to get money that you paid for with your taxes. It's all over this country, guys. Here's an example of that happening where a U.S. citizen was

Starting point is 01:48:43 held, a journalist, I believe he is, because they said he spoke about Israel. Now, when I said this is not new, realize this happened to Derek more than once, not necessarily because of Israel, but who knows, but just realize it doesn't get as much attention when it happens to somebody like Derek, and I think that's worth noting. But here's a good clip. U.S. citizens are now being detained at the border for allegedly writing negative tweets about Israeli politicians. I'm not joking. Take a listen. I was detained in question by the Department of Homeland Security yesterday for three hours about Israel. I returned yesterday for my trip to Lebanon and through the passport line, they immediately took my passport, put it in a red folder and said the DHS has to speak with him.

Starting point is 01:49:24 Of course, I went. They didn't let me take my luggage. And when I get there, they start asking me questions about me, my family, my friends, where I want. went to high school, they wrote everything down. I'm not going to lie to them. They look through my social medias, and then they asked me, have you ever doxed anyone? I said, no. Have you ever dachshed a politician? I said, no.

Starting point is 01:49:41 Have you ever said anything negative about an Israeli politician? I said, yes. Hell, there's not one guy. Now, there's two guys, agents with the badges around their nets, asking me questions, and they say, why would you do that? And we're talking about a tweet about Ben Gavir and Israeli minister I made in April of 2026. You know, the guy who is literally calling for the death of children, and I'm not making a hyperbolic statement, literally saying that's how you win. You kill their children. He said that like three times over the last couple of months, guys, or saying we burn their houses down or saying how it's never ending. And now your government is hustling you because you say that's a bad person? Wake up, guys. They told me, do not do that again. Do not make a negative tweet about him. After about 30 minutes more of questioning, why would I criticize,

Starting point is 01:50:28 Ben Gavir of the Israeli government took more information, my phone number, my email, my address, and then they said, do not do this again. Guys, what is happening? We got U.S. Border Patrol scolding Americans for writing bad tweets about Israeli politicians. Like, are we still sovereign? Now, somebody asked in the chat, like, why do you talk to them? It's good question, right? But let's get in to the difference they believe exists on the border.

Starting point is 01:50:55 This is hugely important, guys. and this is something Derek Overlapped in his recent article, but something we've written about more than once on this platform. They don't believe your rights exist when you're on the border. Even if you're leaving going, it doesn't matter. When you're in the realm of the border control, which right now seems to encroach well beyond the 100-mile zone they create and you can see it with ICE and everything else,

Starting point is 01:51:15 they believe your rights don't exist. That's why ICE is now just grabbing phones and look in it, but they don't believe they have to do any of it, kicking your doors in because they believe they're looking for an immigrant. That is why that really cut, that's where it stems from. now it's being largely more abused. So here, oh, again, first actually,

Starting point is 01:51:30 and this is the same image, by the way, we're going to show you in a second. That is not a joke. That's from the ACLU. It's called the Constitution Free Zone. And they do not deny this. This is a place around the border where they argue your rights don't apply

Starting point is 01:51:41 because they have to deal with immigration. Look at Maine, guys. You live in the state of Maine, in their mind, you don't even have rights, at least as it pertains if and when they want to act in that way. Not to just in every given moment, right? But if they want to just go and say, We think they could just do what they want.

Starting point is 01:51:56 And that's not a joke. Look at the, look at Oregon. Half of California. Like, this is insane. And this has been so long. Now, Derek was detained at the border without charge. And they allowed his pet to die. Literally, he was saying, my pet's in the car.

Starting point is 01:52:12 It's hot outside. And they let his pet die. And they didn't charge him with anything. He had no reason to stop him. Oh, you're wearing an anarchy shirt. Like, that's what happened to him recently, actually. But just realizing this goes back a long way. This is 2020.

Starting point is 01:52:23 Now, that's about Israel. That's why it's getting more attention, but just this is not new, guys. We need to realize that. Now, Derek wrote this on August 19th. Now, again, this is not a new conversation. Whitney, Derek, myself, we've been covering the Anderil surveillance, a palinger surveillance for a long time. The point of this article is the tripling of it, the new development of this very topic that we've, like, Whitney's been covering for a long time. Derek's been covering for a long time.

Starting point is 01:52:49 Peter Thiel-funded company Anderil. same kind of weird association with the lore you know this is this is the it's all interconnected to these people like the whole Peter Thiel verse the founders fund

Starting point is 01:53:01 the Mark Andreessen's Palmer Palmer Lucky and all the different people have talked about Lonsdale Peter Thiel fund the company underrill to triple the number of autonomous

Starting point is 01:53:10 surveillance towers along the US Mexico border now these aren't just these aren't just cameras guys this isn't even just a flock camera these things go well beyond that They are weaponized and they biometrics.

Starting point is 01:53:24 I mean, it's the whole thing. This is where it's going. These are lined up around the border. Do you, I mean, so even just coming and going, do you, do you, why aren't you, you're going to get, they don't even ask because your rights don't exist. Give up your biometrics. Give up your personal information. Give us your phone. Is that what a free country sounds like to you?

Starting point is 01:53:43 In June, the government accountability office, the GAO, released a new report that detailed how the Department of Homeland Security has content. contracted with Underreal Industries, a Peter Thiel-funded company to nearly triple the number of surveillance towers along the U.S. border. The report outlines the plan to increase the number of surveillance towers from 830 to 2,300 by 2034. Detect items of interest such as people's or vehicles. So it's in the flock realm, but when you dive into these, you see that it goes way beyond what we're talking about today. The Electronic Frontier Foundation, a nonprofit dedicated to digital privacy and rights called the expansion of the border surveillance, quote, a digital dumpster fire for human rights and civil liberties.

Starting point is 01:54:29 Quote, it's not just surveillance towers, drones, aerostat. Now, this is what's important to. This, it's not, you know, it's a autonomous surveillance dynamic that I'm going to get into, Eric Prince is stepping into. And you know where that goes. We just talked about this. Fake front companies. But either way, the point is it's not just these surveillance towers.

Starting point is 01:54:49 It's drones. It says aerostatts, surveillance vehicles, ground sensors, game cameras, license plate readers, and are also part of the vast taxpayer-funded infrastructure that threatens all of those who work, live, or seek refuge in the borderlands, says the EFF. And they wrote this in their response to the GA report. It says, quote, this technology isn't exclusive to U.S. federal agencies. It's also deployed by state and local law enforcement and even by governments on the Mexican side, meaning it's all over the country, guys, and it's going to grow.

Starting point is 01:55:23 The EFF also notes that these rapidly expanding surveillance technologies place residential neighborhoods in Arizona and all around the border within the site of those towers. So it's not just that you exist in that weird limbo state, but these very things that go well beyond the normal things that we're already griping about or rightly calling out and should remove because they're unconstitutional. And they're looking at your house. you're literally living next to one of these super invasive biometric camera with drones.

Starting point is 01:55:53 Why? How is that even something that should mean, it's because they have created the cutout to argue that you don't get rights when they have this problem. Now, if we would have cared about this when it was starting to build up, the point is inalienable, unalienable, they both mean the same thing. Ultimately, the point comes down to the fact that they're just creating a justification to change something that is not able to be. changed is what it means. So we're already being lied to. I mean, the fact that this even exists

Starting point is 01:56:23 shows you that they've never cared about our rights or they don't understand them. Anderil was founded by Trump donor, Palmer Lucky, with funding from Palantir co-founder Peter Thiel. They are one of several Teal Associated companies that have seen their stars rise under Trump 2.0. Last American Vagovans previously reported how numerous acolytes of Teal are or were serving in the second Trump administration, including numerous employees of Anderri. Now, that's the one he discussed about both the Curtis Yardvin philosophy driving it and the many different, and there's tons of them, of Teal-associated people that are packed in Trump's administration. It says one such example is Trey Stevens, the co-founder and chair of Anderil Industries.

Starting point is 01:57:02 Anderil, again, being the one that's contracting all of these cameras. Andriel is aiming to be the main provider of autonomous surveillance towers along the border as far back as July 2020. So this is where you get into the conversation of the smart wall and realizing now hopefully that this was always a play. They're always trying to drive us here. The surveillance tower and building it in 2020,

Starting point is 01:57:28 the surveillance towers, the surveillance towers use on Anderil AI software known as lattice that automatically detects, I just said, read that funny, they use an Anderile AI software known as lattice. Now, not the same as red lattice we talked about, but it's interesting overlap, that automatically the text classifies and tracks people and vehicles from miles away,

Starting point is 01:57:50 miles away during the day and at night. Andrewl describes lattice as a software platform that takes data from disparate and distributed sensors, feeds and systems, and moves this data into a single integration layer, the control grid. And once this all becomes interconnected, you have one single,

Starting point is 01:58:09 and this is what they're driving for. This is why they unsililied all of your personal information, and jammed it to one place because otherwise it's more too difficult for this to be possible or whatever else they would want to do with that, you know, train their AI models, for example. Even though that violates your rights, removes privacy, but you know, who cares? Trump's saving the world, right? It says in October 2024, towards the end of the Biden administration, Andrew will announces a $249478,466 dollar contract for more than 500 of the Roadrunner MS and additional Pulsar,

Starting point is 01:58:42 electric, electronic warfare capabilities. So Biden to Trump. See how it just continues, guys? Left and rights an illusion. In January, the U.S. Marine Corps awarded Anderil a $23.9 million contract to deliver more of the 600 Bolt M systems. Oh, wait, wait, wait. Okay. Now the military is ordering the things that we're using for civilian enforcement.

Starting point is 01:59:04 Yeah, guys, that's never been. It's, I mean, since they've started giving wartime material to your local police stations, we don't have a police. We have military. That's it's clearly where this has gotten to. And so understand the Marine Corps is using the things that they're now, you, I mean, that means it's a sliver away from being the drone enforcement military dynamic that we're all worried about. The Axon taser slash Gundra. I mean, however they want to talk about it.

Starting point is 01:59:31 It's not just surveillance. This is encroaching on the idea of actual law, like kinetic violent enforcement. It says in March, Anderil partnered with the U.S. Army to, quote, consolidate the procurement and management of the company's commercially available technologies. So really, it's military to connect technology that they're using on you. That's the way to look at it. The 10-year contract has a total estimated value of $20 billion. So that's what it looks like to spend less money and have smaller government, according to Trump. Most recently in July, Andrewill celebrated the production of the first Ohio-made YF.F.

Starting point is 02:00:09 Q44A model, an autonomous drone known as the Fury, which it'll come up again. You're going to see that. Arguably, probably what's going to be happening in this country to some degree. But interestingly, as you want to talk about the side point of, you know, creating jobs, do you realize that what they're building into is a system that doesn't need you? So when they always sell you on these technocratic ideas as bringing jobs to the people that they want to manipulate, they're speaking to the people that, you know, the people that they don't think a lot about, that they think are, you know, people out there that, the,

Starting point is 02:00:39 the working class people that they think they can just lie to because they think they're stupid. In many cases, they're not. And what you understand here is to sell you on the idea of taking over your industry, whatever that may be and building it into a data center or whatever else and say, it's going to save your saying, it won't. It may feel that way momentarily when money flows in for a second, but ultimately they outsource everything, use autonomous work. It's just what we see.

Starting point is 02:01:00 Look it up in anywhere you want right now. All these promises, there's even mainstream coverage of it. The promises of jobs and security have, what they say, the title basically said of, you know, fallen short, and you read into it, and across the country, all the promises of what they would bring are not being delivered. And all the promises of not using resources, including from Trump, have been lies. Crazy. It's like we didn't see it coming. It's worth noting that the funding for the autonomous surveillance towers, that's what they're called,

Starting point is 02:01:28 these ASTs, is coming in part from funds allocated by Trump's controversial, big, beautiful bill. Or more correctly framed, the Big Brother Bill. It says to be perfectly accurate, the funding came from the pockets of you, American taxpayers, and then was taken by federal government under duress before being distributed to companies like Andoril. Hashtag freedom. The big beautiful bill, big brother bill set aside $30 billion, $30 billion for digital monetization effort, sort of like the, what was it, the Smith Munt Modernization Act. You know, so it sounds like it's getting better, but it's getting worse.

Starting point is 02:02:06 involving artificial intelligence and biometric surveillance, because we all want that, don't we? Under the heading, U.S. Customs and Border Protection Technology, vetting activities in the big, beautiful bill, and other efforts to enhance border security, the bill gives $637 million for the developed deployment of technology relating to the biometric entry and exit system under Section 2708 of the Intelligence Reform and Terrorism Prevention Act of 2004. you've seen this before. We've talked about this, as Whitney says, I think I've got to see here right here. She says, Hope Trump supporters, this is 2025, will soon catch on

Starting point is 02:02:50 to how the virtual border wall being built by companies backed by Peter Thiel. Think of Stino's thinking of far ahead she is on this. Is meant to serve as a Trojan horse for digital ID by requiring not just foreigners entering U.S., but any government traveling abroad to submit a digital ID or digital biometric entry exit tracking system. And so I said, as Trump said himself, it will be by air, by land, by sea,

Starting point is 02:03:12 according to Trump. So that's not just immigrants, guys. Welcome to your Freedom Maga biometric tracking system. We will finally complete the biometric entry exit visa tracking system, which we need desperately. The trick is including the word visa. And they all cheer, but that's not what it applies to, guys. You think you need biometric to track people's visas? This is about tracking everybody in every which way. And we can all see that now. But just realize he was either being played by somebody or lying to you, and both of which have all clearly happened up until now. For years, Congress has required biometric entry, exit visa tracking systems, but it has never been completed. The politicians are all talk, no action, never happens, never happens.

Starting point is 02:04:04 Hillary Clinton all talks. Unfortunately, when there is action, it's always the wrong decision. Do you ever notice? In my administration, we will ensure that this system is in place. And I will tell you, it will be on land, it will be on sea, it will be in air. We will have a proper tracking system. That wasn't it interesting? And I always point this out when I play this. I mean, this is what he does. This is how. low an opinion he has of you. That he just, all he does is frame it as Congress needs it and we, and these guys have never gotten it done. So it's like now we're the fight in the deep state.

Starting point is 02:04:47 We'll do it. Well, why do you want a biometric tracking system? Didn't we just bite that under Biden? Who cares? They said the Clinton tried and failed, so we'll do it. People fall for that stuff. But if you're, you know, and maybe you weren't stupid, but you were just in the moment, you thought Trump was honest.

Starting point is 02:05:02 You know, well, he probably has a plan. You know, people fall for a lot of different reasons. Either way, you can now see the true path. And all he did right there was just basically, you know, like I guess reverse psychology, pretend like because they want, they didn't, they failed to do it because they're terrible at this job. And I'm going to succeed. We suddenly want biometric tracking systems.

Starting point is 02:05:22 I argue that most didn't fall for it, but a lot did. Continuing, it says, I've argued, Derek continues, since Trump's election in 2016 that the use of immigration would be used to divide the masses and help usher in the full. final stages of the American police state. He literally nailed that. A smart or virtual border wall, which is what they're talking about. His concept was supported by Trump and Biden. Same point from before, and it really was, both of them. The federal government and courts have consistently ruled in favor of the so-called border search exception. That allows search and seizure by agents of the government

Starting point is 02:06:01 without a warrant within 100 miles of the border. Now today with the ice overlap, they've been forced to sort of make this really public. I just don't understand how we don't revolt about this. Nearly two out of three people in the country live within the 100 mile border zone. Think about that for a second, guys. And what they're telling you is if you're in that, and really we now see that it goes anywhere they want. If they justify it being under the guise of immigration, they can just go look. We can look at your phone. We can kick your door in and check what's going on. That's how they operate. And I'm not making this up. You can look at this for yourself. And so the most common overlap is when people go to the border and they just go

Starting point is 02:06:41 give me your phone. I'm going to dig through your information. Give me your login or you're going to go to jail. And then when you try to sue, you actually have judges whose only job, by the way, is to uphold the Constitution, who stupidly argues somehow that this is allowed. Why? Because danger? Well, that doesn't matter. Inalienable, you know, unalienable anybody. You don't understand the reality of why these things don't get to be challenged because fill in the blank. That's how lost we are. That these are the people that are supposed to be, they're job is to enforce this and they're the ones allowing enforcement to break those things, even though that's not how that works.

Starting point is 02:07:15 If you truly understand it, it's just alarming to me. In fact, it says this belief was just reaffirmed in July when the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit ruled that manual searches of cell phones at the border are routine and thus exempt from their requirement of individual suspicion under the Fourth Amendment. Why? Because it's so, so here's what's crazy about this. So you do it enough to where you argue it's routine, therefore being routine, we expect it. So therefore it's not unnecessary. That's just insane. That's self-fulfilling logic, guys. So if you weren't doing it at all and you petition to do it, well, the ruling would be unconstitutional because no one expects it. So you're telling

Starting point is 02:07:57 them, go ahead and do these things for a couple of years, then come back and we'll let you do them. I mean, it's just sick, guys. It's completely broken. It's not the reality. in 2024, the GOA, I mean, think before I go past that, the unnecessary search and seizure. So you're just going to the border. You're not breaking the law. You have no reason to think you're doing anything wrong,

Starting point is 02:08:17 and that's what we're talking about. One of these recent examples, one of these guys was picked up because of social media posts or whatever, and he did that thing where he gave them the wrong code and it deleted the entire phone. That's a new feature for some of these phones. And they tried to charge him with a crime

Starting point is 02:08:31 for hiding his own information from them. I mean, it's just that there's no, that is it completely unnecessary. There's no guiding reason. You didn't suspect him of a crime. That is literally why the Fourth Amendment was created or at least outlined. Because that's the truth of it, guys. If you understand the founding idea, it was about outlining what they believed were inherent rights for anybody and just only able to enforce it within these boundaries.

Starting point is 02:08:57 That's what you, if you really read it, you understand they meant that. So to argue it only applies to Americans is just is not understanding what these things really were. or dishonestly lying about them for your own power and control. In 2024, the GOA released a report warning that DHS and Associated Federal Law Enforcement agencies were using more than 20 types of surveillance technologies against the American people without a warrant and with limited privacy protections.

Starting point is 02:09:23 Every year since the attacks of September 11, 2001, Derek ends, Americans have been forced to endure more and more surveillance measures from the federal government, as well as countless state and local law enforcement agencies. As we approach the 25th anniversary of the 9-11 false flag, it's more important than ever for the American public to ask, are we really free if we no longer have privacy? Important point. Now here is the Congress gave Andrew the keys to the border, the state of the state of surveillance post that simply outlined some of the details. I just want to highlight this yet again.

Starting point is 02:09:59 Same overlapping point. 20-20, $85 million for the Border Patrol declares the program, a formal program of record. So that's a lot different than we're looking for immigrants. Okay. That's it. That is we're tracking everybody. And guys, if we're paying it, if not even just paying attention, if your eyes are open, you know what this is.

Starting point is 02:10:19 It's obvious. So they're telling you in 2020, in 2020, in 2020, guys, before, during the pandemic, we're just recording everybody. And that happened then to 2021, 2021, 23, AI drones. So this has already been building out. 2024, $249 million for Pentagon weapon systems. So just showing you yet again that the things they're using domestically are also being applied for weapons abroad, which is not uncommon, but it just shows you what they, you know, it's like using cattle,

Starting point is 02:10:53 you know, social distancing and all these lockdown things they use in prisons and cattle on Americans during COVID-19. It just shows you something. See the Anderil drones that are taking AI. driven warfare, new heights. This is 2025. Autonomous systems like Anderil drones aim to make aerial combat faster and cheaper. I'm simply showing you this because I believe this is where it's going, whether it's Anderil, whether it's Anderil or the one I'm going to get to next. I think it's Vectis Air Defense Systems or any other, this is, I believe this is the direction it's going in. And we all see it. Anderil is redefining defense tech with AI guided systems like the Fury aircraft. So what they just

Starting point is 02:11:32 described as something being built in Ohio, arguably for some kind of local domestic dynamic, is also being used for AI-guided defense outside of this country. The same one. This is from Defense Express. US Army signs 10-year, $20 billion deal with Anderil to consolidate 120-plus contracts into a single AI-powered lattice software framework. 2026 March. So again, what it shows you is not just one.

Starting point is 02:12:05 but rather a basically consolidating it in one focal, one thing, one controlled database by one company, or at least the ones they use to do the one thing. Because what, 120 contracts, these are scattered around the country, or at least around the different companies. And so now you have the U.S. Army giving Andrews control over all of it. I just think it's a consolidation against this is the control grid.

Starting point is 02:12:28 This is building around us as we speak, and it's physical representation right now. And as I said before, Trump's, this is the virtual wall, but it's, you know, a whole thing all around. Free your mind simply says on top of this post, this is the irony of the, as Derek was highlighting as well, the irony of the anti-immigrant rhetoric. It's being utilized, even if you believe it's necessary. It's being utilized to expand surveillance infrastructure and the detention centers will come into play for the domestic terrorists of the future. And you damn will know it. Both Trump and Biden have pushed on that very direction.

Starting point is 02:13:03 That's how you weaponize prejudice and use it to further your interests. Well said. Exactly. And I think that's the whole point here is that ultimately we're dealing with a situation where you may even truly believe that it's necessary for what you're aiming it at. And really it's going to be aimed at everything. And if that matters to you, even if you care about the other issue, if your rights are more important to you, then maybe you should reflect on that.

Starting point is 02:13:27 Another quick overlapping point. You've seen this already during the whole like razor bob, you know, boo. thing, whatever the hell that was when they were doing that last, when they said the gates on the border are swinging open, right? I did a little more due diligence on this. And what's interesting is the argument is that there are flood gates, I guess. To me, it's irrelevant. What this amounts to is the fact that the gates are open. And as people make the point of, well, I don't see any flat cameras anywhere around this wide open gate. So clearly, it's about us. It's always been about us, guys. But what's interesting, though, is to give you the point of what they are

Starting point is 02:14:03 is that apparently these the areas flood, which is true, and that if they don't have these, by the way, these bars that are clearly open, like you can see through the bars, that just because of the bar's pressure of the water, that it would cause the whole barrier to get knocked down, which I just find hard to believe, seeing as I couldn't just build it, I don't know, but either way, the argument is they open these things and hold them open because, so they don't have the pressure built up. Okay, fine, whatever. Doesn't that still amount to the fact that you've got a gate open on the border with nobody there watching it. So why wouldn't they just all go there?

Starting point is 02:14:36 It's an illusion. Like there are things that are happening, guys, but we have to understand as many Republicans are seeing that this whole thing has been played against us. Now, I think I didn't, I just play it right here. It's not really important. This is what he's saying. They're simply showing you.

Starting point is 02:14:56 They're locked open. You see a little pin in there. So explain that to me, you know? With all that we're seeing and the argument that we have to stop the illegal immigration and you have multiple places along southern border that are wide open, and there's nobody in sight. Now, yes, I'm sure they patrol these areas. That's what it says.

Starting point is 02:15:19 But doesn't that seem a little bit odd? You've got flock cameras lined up along our streets and you've got nothing. I mean, guys, it just needs to scream that this is all about you and convincing you that your life needs to be under their control because of something that clearly at least doesn't exist the way they claim it does. It should be scary. International Cyber Digest reports that Blackwater founder Eric Prince launched a company selling air defense by subscription to protect data centers, military bases,

Starting point is 02:15:47 shipping lanes, weird how they confuse those things. No, they don't confuse them. Their data centers are military. The founder has launched Vectus air defense systems. Jammers, cannons, interceptors sold as a service. See, this is where this goes. To owners of critical sites, Eric Prince. Well, here quickly is the breakdown, Eric Prince of and Swarmer is the name of it, Vectus air defense systems. You won't be surprised by what this shows. Vectus air defense systems. Air defense as a service.

Starting point is 02:16:19 You're going to see this common thread in a lot of this. Contributing battle-proven air defense, battle-proven. Now, where have we heard that before? Defense technologies and autonomy. Now, look, just from my experience, there's only one group in the world that uses the argument battle-proven, and that's Israel about things they've used on Gaza. or, by the way, that they've jointly used in Ukraine, both of which are happening here.

Starting point is 02:16:44 It says, supported more than 100,000 real world combat missions in Ukraine since April 24. Then it goes on to say, Vactus air defense systems will integrate best in class, battle-tested technologies from the United States, Ukraine, Israel, and other allied nations, combining advanced detection and tracking with layered counter UAS architect. texture incorporating detection, electronic warfare, drone interceptors, and large caliber cannons. Great. With a high rate of fire. So now you've got armed drones circulating things within the domestic United States. Yep, exactly. Exactly what they're already doing, by the way.

Starting point is 02:17:25 Realize where we are. As threats and defensive technologies evolve, the systems deployed at customer sites are expected to evolve with them. Interesting. So we're going to come back to. I want to check something really quickly. quickly, but so Israel, Ukraine, the United States. Now, what I'm a highlight for you is the merging of these things in Ukraine with their very clear tech. But you remember what Eric Prince was involved with, right? I mean, I think it's very important to understand that this guy has been involved

Starting point is 02:17:56 with a lot of weird, shadowy Israel overlaps, which I've talked about a lot. And frankly, one of things I thought was frustrating is that I've got over the amazing article from Whitney, the Prince and the Spy that she wrote for the Last American Bagabond. I mean, what? Like many, many times over the years, but like in the last couple of months, like three times, because it's continually becoming relevant or more so with the, with the fake U.S. companies, with the spy, I mean, every part of it. So it's kind of like, damn it, this is probably the best time I should have, you know, I'm not going to go into depth again today because I've just recently did it, but I will go over the main points, but please read the article because it's very clear that what this relates to is people like

Starting point is 02:18:31 Eric Prince becoming sort of a front player for a foreign company. Somebody was simply just pointing out that the store, no, it looks good to me. So here, I'll put this in the chat, by the way, for the U.S. store, or excuse me, the TLAF store to buy the clothes and the, you know, the shop for us. Here's the link. Somebody was saying, oh, Mama, Madama Sue was saying the chat, the store said it closed. Looks open to me. Let me know if you guys continue to see that.

Starting point is 02:18:59 It could be some kind of a glitch on their end. So continuing, the overlap of Israel, Ukraine, U.S., best in class. Like if we understand the specific field we're talking about and the spyware, the tech side, Israel dominates all of this and we know what they do. And it's their own, it's not secret. They proudly talk about how they infiltrate tech and manipulate foreign countries, including the United States, by the way, brag about it. So here's, this is why I include this article.

Starting point is 02:19:32 Well, actually first, the point I want to highlight, Israeli defense firm selling anti-dron systems to Ukraine by way of Poland, 2022. So when they talk about Ukraine battle testing. You know, we're talking about Israeli tech, guys. That's important to see. Israel in contact and establishing connections with Ukrainian drone manufacturers to foster cooperation and exchange expertise. We'll come back to that one.

Starting point is 02:19:56 It's the point of Eric Prince wanting to sell you a smartphone built in Israel that he ended up scrapping because everybody realized it was built in Israel. And guess what? Built by the people who literally worked for the Anasso Group. This guy is not who he seems to be, at least not what some people think he is. So Whitney wrote this, 2023, the Prince and the Spy. And the simple point here, guys,

Starting point is 02:20:17 I want to make sure I say her name right. I always get it wrong. I think it's La Tal. Oops, not in the right spot. Yeah, it's LaTal Lesham. She's an Israeli spy. Not former, she's an Israeli spy. And ultimately, the long story short of it is

Starting point is 02:20:33 that she was involved with building Comframe that he was a part of, or excuse me, a Carbine, Comframe 2, but in this case, Carbine 911, which was the connection to all of this that goes back to the sort of like spying and stuff in the first place, which is in another Israeli company. And ultimately the point in this is talking about how they create fake companies to be

Starting point is 02:20:50 able to manipulate the supply chain and all that stuff we already know. In the case of Comframe, which is involved with a whole bunch of other scannels, read the article, the point is that they set this company up and they make it very clear. We would not be able to do this. And the whole point of it is selling Israeli tech and getting it immersed in the U.S. system. It's literally outlined on what used to be the website that's no longer there, by the way. at least no longer public, and then using, you know,

Starting point is 02:21:14 their connections to get Israeli tech in the U.S. military field. And what they say is, look, we couldn't do this as Israeli company. So the only way we ultimately allowed to do it is having Eric Prince be the front person as the company. So it's an American company. Now, it's not exactly the way they frame it,

Starting point is 02:21:31 but that's literally what it says. And so understand, as we just discussed here in 28 August 16, Trump makes it easier for foreign governments to secretly operate U.S. companies. He literally changed the reality via, I think it was the executive order and saying these, like basically creating a circumstance

Starting point is 02:21:47 where the, or no, actually, well, anyway, read, watch the show. There's a bunch of different actions, creating a circumstance where these companies no longer had to record who was the actual leading financial backer. So outside forces could just fund Eric Prince to start a company in the United States, completely control it,

Starting point is 02:22:04 and they would not be required to divulge that information. And they used to be the case. How do we not find that alarming? Or the fact that they were, as we just discussed before, creating private state-backed cyber attack forces, which overlap with the same groups, the same NSO-Israeli-type companies. So it's important to see that right now,

Starting point is 02:22:25 Eric Prince is pushing back into this field as the, where was the, hit back to that article should have left open, right here. Vectus Air Defense Systems. And it is supported by more than 100,000 rear-world combat missions, and again, creating a autonomous AI surveillance in kinetic, violent enforcement in the United States. So why wouldn't we consider this to be just one more extension

Starting point is 02:22:51 of what he continually has been doing? And here is the same point. Eric Prince wants to sell you a secure, and even in quotes on MIT technology, smartphone, that's too good to be true. There's a lot in here that I find relevant, the main part. To it unplug, the unplugged was what it was called, their day-to-day technology operations at the time that no longer exists as far as I can tell

Starting point is 02:23:13 were run by Aaron Carpin, a former employee of Communi Take, the Israeli startup that gave rise to the now infamous hacker for hire group called NSO Group. My God, he's also a veteran of Israel's unit 8200. And he hid that, guys. Eric Prince literally hid that from people until it was found out, and that's why it seems to have collapsed. So maybe we should question about what the hell this is. talking about the way they're building this around the border and everything else, guys,

Starting point is 02:23:41 it feels a little bit concerning to me. Oh, shoot, I forgot to bring this up. Oh, but I don't think I went too much further. I might have shown this if I didn't, just the Israel defense firm selling drone technology to each other, the idea of Eric Prince and his secure a smartphone and the fact that literally connected to the NSA group and an Israeli startup. I mean, just wild. So I recommend you read this article get again, but you have not, because it opens your

Starting point is 02:24:08 mind do a lot of different things, including the fact as we continually show people that they create these fake things for this very purpose. Now, on the flock overlap and a couple of the points, I wanted to add this to it because it is, you know, the same conversation. As I showed you, the flock, I think it was the algorithm. Let me see if I can grab it really quickly. Which one was that? It was, maybe I can't remember what it was called. Oh, there you go. Look at that. I got his, I mean, this is the tweet. Nice. There it is. His name is Shlomi Lior. He is the algorithm and systems engineer for flock safety, and he worked in these Israeli military intelligence for seven years,

Starting point is 02:24:57 or till this very moment, for all we know. That's the point. At flock, and plenty other examples, by the way. So first, as Orwell just talked about the other day, about the fusion centers are warning police about growing anger over flock and monitoring Instagram for anti-Flock posts. Really? Orwell points out,

Starting point is 02:25:18 while the government is making lists on who destroys flock cameras, their new situational awareness, use of drones for police departments, and fusion centers has already been approved in many cities around the country. Now, think about the connection we just talked about. The violent enforcement that we're talking about, that ICE is using, that Eric Prince is building. I mean, this is coming, guys. It's already here. So then adds this video to it. And she goes, yet another example. Now, this is Palantir. This is a Palantir tech. And just watch what they're outlining, guys. This is happening already. Do you want this to be the world we live in?

Starting point is 02:25:51 This is Maven Smart System. Palantir. Haven is what he said. We've talked about it. It's Palantir. Software as a service product that we are deployed. Software as a service product. Well, what they're really talking about is security, defense even.

Starting point is 02:26:05 So it is the same field. The only difference is they're selling it to you domestically under a different term. Going across the entire department. As you can see, it's not just one data feed. It's multiple. And instead of having eight or nine systems for those decision makers to look at every single day, in order for them to make decisions, you then fuse it into a single visualization tool.

Starting point is 02:26:29 The single visualization tool allows you to select, deselect different types of data, look at different approaches to data, but more importantly, action from the same system that you're trying to develop your workflows around. Once you have a detection that you want to actually move and actually move into a targeting workflow, for example, this is what we do. Left-click, right-click, left-click, magically, it becomes a detection. That detection then gets moved into a workflow.

Starting point is 02:27:01 This is standard digitized workflow, but I want to walk you through it quickly. You have different types of targets that are identified on the left there. Every single column produces a different type of decision-making process. Once you have that decision and you're trying to actually action that process, we now move into COA generation, course of action generation, where we are automatically via a number of factors trying to identify what the best asset to prosecute a target looks like. Once we've got the different approaches and we select one, we then can move directly into how do we action that target. So we've gone from identifying the target to now coming up with

Starting point is 02:27:40 the course of action, to now actioning that target all from one system. This is revolutionary. We were having this done in about eight or nine systems. We're here. Humans were literally moving detections left and right in order to get to our desired instant. This is the case actually closing a kill chain. I mean, it speaks for itself, doesn't it? I mean, it's exactly the kind of control grid from the surveillance side of it that Catherine's been outlining for such a long time.

Starting point is 02:28:09 I just really need people to realize that it's happening right around you right now, not just coming in the future, happening. So if you care about it, do something about it. I'm not advocating for violence. Here is another post showing you that not only are they still doing this, but they're hiding it from you because they know we don't want it. I think that speaks for itself as well. And by the way, overlaps with the company that I was trying to tell you about. Actually, first, one of the things we recently talked about was this kind of weird rise, first of all, of people

Starting point is 02:28:36 that I don't think actually care about this topic, suddenly talking about flock, because it got a lot of attention. And then people, by the way, with good intentions, like, for example, Jason Bassler being framed as being a part of a sci-out because they were honestly talking about it. Like, it's a weird overlap. But the point was that it matters that they're doing. illegal unconstitutional surveillance, no matter what the company is. But the conversation of Axon versus Flok, it mattered to know which ones were involved, and there was people switching, and the groups Axon are connected with, like Carbine, by the way, back to the other conversation, is that ultimately, as I wrote,

Starting point is 02:29:08 flock, axon, vigilant solutions, genetic, all the real Sciop is dividing us into allowing any of them. So if we all debate, no, it's this one, no, it's that one, as opposed to realizing no matter which one they're using, they're all a problem. That's the SIOP to get us to divide. It always is. By the way, really quickly, Steve and I were looking at this on a show the other day,

Starting point is 02:29:30 and I realized what it was, why we were getting inconsistent numbers. If you zoom, the numbers change. See that? That's what it was. So the camera had just been zoomed in, and the numbers were, so if you zoom out for the United States,

Starting point is 02:29:43 you get the accurate number, at least as far as they can verify, meaning there could be some they haven't seen, And that's why if you want, you can add to this by, or at least they'll verify it, but you send them information and they'll add to the map if it's accurate. This shows you something important that's still to this day, despite the conversation of how Axon was the real problem. Maybe it is. Maybe this is all wrong. Who knows?

Starting point is 02:30:03 Question everything. Flock safety still holds 82% of the entire market around the country. That's what those blue dots are in regard to all of them. But actually, in fact, they're all blue, which probably should make different, but you can see the different. colors and shows you what the different places are. But Motorola solutions, which is vigilant solutions in regard to the cameras, 5%. So secondarily still is Motorola. Genetac has 2% in the bottom 6%, which I think is about 1% or below is axon and slow growing, but still in the lowest category. So weirdly enough, 5% unknown, whatever that means, maybe just because they haven't identified them,

Starting point is 02:30:44 But okay, back to the point. This is vigilant solutions. The company actually known as Mortarola Solutions. That's who makes it, which Trump has stock in. He also has stock an axon. But maybe the whole point was to get us to look in the wrong direction. Worth asking, either way, they know we don't want this, and now they're hiding them in traffic cones.

Starting point is 02:31:06 It's perfect. Perfectly disgusting. It looks like a normal bridge over a canal. This might look like a normal traffic cone. But if we go in a little closer, you're going to see. there's a hole cut in it. And this, in this is a camera manufactured by a company called Motorola Solutions. It is capturing data on vehicles for customs and border protection. My name's Dave Moss. I am director of investigations of the Electronic Frontier Foundation. And we're in Imperial County,

Starting point is 02:31:31 just southwest of Raleigh. We're about 25 miles from the border. That's North Carolina, right? I don't know if you said it or not. But either way, if you're in the area, make sure you call this out. make sure you know about it i mean and look if it's happening there it's happening all over call this an automated license plate reader or a lpr this specifically is a covert aopr it's collecting data on every car that passes uploading into a massive searchable database and they store this data for years now ask yourself does that change anything i mean realize these are unconstitutional regardless but in one case they're doing it publicly right they're going we're just doing this for safety okay well now that you're hiding

Starting point is 02:32:11 them secretly, doesn't that change it a little bit? It sure does, guys. For a legal perspective, it changed it a lot. But they don't care either way because they're breaking the law, in my opinion, from the get-go. But I just think it shows you that they really know what they're doing is wrong and they don't care. Most of the stuff they're capturing are members of the community. People who are driving through to go to their ranch, to go to the farm, to go to work. Just for sake of time, you can all have included, you can watch the rest of it. But to make his point, continue to continue his point, is it actually helping? Are these things actually stopping crime? in fact, most, most examples around the country, as Bassler already told you, are not.

Starting point is 02:32:48 Verifiably so, because people are becoming motivated and they're demanding evidence and they don't have it. And as long as they show you, prove they're, proved that they're, that flock either misrepresented it or had some weird unicorn location where it all worked out the way they said it did. First of all, before that, we showed you this yesterday, but this is one of many examples, but the idea of this woman spent seven months, seven months. how is that even possible in jail or rather legal hell, excuse me, but ultimately in the process of it,

Starting point is 02:33:16 because the flock camera identified the wrong car. I mean, people, like, there was a guy, the reason I said, the guy we recently talked about was in jail for, it was a while. Now I'm conflating the concepts, but the point was the guy went in jail because they thought he was the guy. And even though, by the way, I'm scattering all these, but the guy we just recently showed you where he went to his front door.

Starting point is 02:33:34 And the guy's like, we have arrest warrant for you. and the guy's all angry and cussing at him. And you guys like, do I look like I'm 43? He guys like 60 or 70 years old. And they just didn't care. Wrong age, wrong picture. And they tried to forcefully arrest him anyway. It's blind adherence to authority from the enforcement arm.

Starting point is 02:33:53 But there's been countless examples of people being pulled over, arrested violently, put in jail because they got it wrong. Because the system either was wrong or somebody lied or whatever it is. And it's not unique. It's not a 1% anomaly. It's actually very prevalent. And there's two articles, both from the same location, Atlanta. 5,000 flock cameras covered land,

Starting point is 02:34:14 yet the police are resolving fewer crimes. Really let that sink in. They read the article. It speaks for itself. They went over the information since it started, and they're actually resolving fewer crimes. Now, what does that mean? Is it because they're getting lazy?

Starting point is 02:34:28 Are they only looking at flock instead of actually doing their job? Probably. And that's what it amounts to. Here's the same thing. flock ring and Atlanta's network, which is disgusting. They're using ring cameras and everything else. More than 28,000 integrated cameras, meaning they've integrated your ring cameras. Welcome to the technocracy.

Starting point is 02:34:47 Haven't improved the city's crime clearance rates. And this is consistent, guys, look around. And I'll include Derek's, excuse me, Jason Bassler's article about this because he includes this was eight ways to take down a flock without a solzol, meaning legal ways you can go around this if you want to choose that path. Ask your city to provide flock works. or to prove, excuse me, that it works. Because if you actually ask, you'll find out that there is no data.

Starting point is 02:35:10 It's only what flock claims. And the truth is, when you back it up in a real world stamp, it doesn't follow it. Find the contract before the renewal. So you can find that they're, you know, like the one that found out they removed that, the line from the contract. They ended there. Ask for privacy review. Show up before the decision is made.

Starting point is 02:35:27 Follow the money. Ask who can search the database, request audit logs. Because what you'll find, like we just did, is that you'll find, they're lying to you guys. Now, as we also recently show, this is the same point from somebody else, but just good to think about. CNN, 2020. Kentucky will record license plates of those who show up

Starting point is 02:35:50 to any mass gatherings such as church services and so on during COVID-19. Damn it, I just thought of something I might want to include. I'm going to search for it right here with you guys. Let's see. Walmart, I think it was $30. It was backwards, but either way, you'll get it. Yeah, here we go.

Starting point is 02:36:08 Kim shared this. Suddenly this feels relevant to what we're talking about. I'll come back to it. Kentucky will record license plates of those who show up there. So in 2020, the U.S. government left and right was telling you that they were going to stop you. They were going to arrest you for going to the beach. They were going to use their license plate readers as they existed then, whether it's them or they did have some version of it. And it was more of a camera to arrest you as he writes. I'm sure you know where it's going. just imagine what they could have done with flock cameras if they had been deployed during the COVID-19 time frame, left or right.

Starting point is 02:36:44 Frankly, they'd be doing the same thing I'm doing now just at a far more serious degree, like we saw them do then. It's just easy to see where this goes. It's not just about the current thing they're shoving in your face. Now, that's why this suddenly came to mind. This guy, guys, this is a crazy, ridiculous story. As Kim says, I can't believe it's real, but it is.

Starting point is 02:37:01 Albany, Georgia's police department, issued a notice asking for the public to do their job for them. Identify this man who didn't even break the law who simply found $30 on the floor of a Walmart and didn't turn it in. So now you're legally required to turn. I mean, I just, it's so insane to me. Now, plenty of people do it because, I mean, look, how many people out there would actually do that? Because you know what I think? Walmart takes it.

Starting point is 02:37:30 The cashier puts it in his pocket. Sorry, I'm a, in many cases, I'm jaded about things. And clearly, I think we know that's how sometimes it goes. Why would you risk that? Do you think it's even going to get it? How would they know who it goes back to? So it's worth giving $30 to Walmart because then they'll hold it until never? I mean, it's just a stupid story.

Starting point is 02:37:48 The Walmart is located on sloppy Boulevard. This sounds like it's a joke, but it's real. So think about this in the context of where this is going. Now suddenly you're the flock cameras beeping your home, I dread. They're showing up, give you $30, you stole from the floor in Walmart. Now it's a stupid small thing, but realize if they're going this far for that, I mean, you're going to, I think this is making a point, trying to say like we need to be radically transparent because it's dishonest that you're, here's what somebody's been talking about,

Starting point is 02:38:17 that your privacy is selfish. That's what they're trying to frame it as right now. How dare you care about your privacy over the collective? Wildly coming from some people on the right, too, by the way, even though they don't see how stupid that sounds from what they were just arguing. but that's the team sport side of it for you. How interesting is that? As Jason says,

Starting point is 02:38:36 not sure who needs to hear this. Cameras on every corner. Masked federal agents who don't identify themselves and don't present warrants. I'll add pain compliance shock gloves, which by the way,

Starting point is 02:38:49 apparently are being used in schools. I'm going to grab it real quick for you since we're talking about it. I had this pulled the side anyway. This is, I mean, I'll just play it for you real quick since I bring it up, but shock gloves, not a joke. I already exist, by the way, in schools.

Starting point is 02:39:11 How is that even possible that ICE is now trying to use? Your own car watching you. He says, this is not what a free country looks like. So much safety, so little freedom. And in fact, as you already could understand, especially if you watch this show, the safety part, the illusion. Clearly, this brings more danger to your life. Oh, let me grab this for you real quick.

Starting point is 02:39:33 He says, 29 schools in Omaha, Nebraska are now used. the same shot gloves that ICE is using, or at least they are trying to as far as I could tell. How is that possible? So this guy, it's almost, it's a local report. I'll just play it for you real quick, even though that makes the point. I just think it's just pretty crazy that this is actually where we are.

Starting point is 02:39:55 And why would schools or parents be okay with that? Right? Why is it okay that you can use shock gloves to, I mean, did you just learn, did you fail to learn how to be a teacher to actually use your words as we're supposed. They teach us. You know, it's just insane.

Starting point is 02:40:10 We're almost going to grab them with a shock glove and sit down. Insane. Even the problematic kids, guys. I mean, the idea, what do you think that does to them? Make them not act out? This officers in 29 local public schools have access to gloves that can be used to shock people. These are the same gloves that ICE is considering purchasing for its agents. I'm your Omaha neighborhood reporter Jeremy Fredericks at OPD's Southwest precinct near 135th in Q.

Starting point is 02:40:35 And I've learned that school resource officers have used these gloves in at least two incidents. There's like Mad Magazine. But you can watch the rest of if you want. They've used shock gloves on children. How is that possible? Right? I mean, really, like how the hell are we actually at a point where that's what's happening? Well, guys, wake up.

Starting point is 02:40:57 This is getting worse and worse, and it's not incremental right now. It's like, it's happening all at once. And we need to do something, guys. So lastly, some updates again with Iran. I want to start with this because it overlaps with surveillance, and I find this very, very, very relevant. It goes back to the IDF in Israel part too. Men Press News.

Starting point is 02:41:15 Iran is not interested in Minnesota's water supply. Israel is, explains women against military madness. Here's what she has to say. Why would Iran cyber attack Minnesota's water infrastructure? Why would Iran even care about Minnesota's water infrastructure? That doesn't make any sense, right? You're right. That doesn't make any sense.

Starting point is 02:41:38 But do you know who does care about Minnesota's water infrastructure? Unfortunately, the answer is Israel. Meet Waterfall Security Solutions. Waterfall is an Israeli tech company, and it's contracted with St. Paul, Minnesota, to protect the city's water system. Waterfall is stacked with Zionists who have literally held leading positions

Starting point is 02:42:00 in the Israeli military, which is now helping the United States bomb Iranian schools, hospitals, and yes, water infrastructure. And Waterfalls founder has boasted of doing offensive cyber security, aka cyber attacks, for the Israeli military. Activists with Wham and Vets for Peace began pressuring the city of St. Paul to cut the contract with this Israeli company last year. Just weeks after the start of our campaign, St. Paul suffered a cyber attack. St. Paul officials would later use that attack as a convenient excuse to extend the waterfall contract for another five years. And this month, just weeks after St. Paul extended the waterfall contract, Minnesota's water system receives another huge cyber attack. Interesting. But what

Starting point is 02:42:54 is the lesson here? We at women against military madness think it's very clear. Israel does not keep us safe. Israel is not protecting anyone. It is murdering babies, stealing land, and generating worldwide violence and chaos that threatens us all. And if you're in St. Paul and you're outraged about your city's complicity with Zionism and apartheid, please stay tuned to WAMS socials as we announce our next steps towards getting the city of St. Paul to cut all ties with the genocidal state of Israel, free Palestine. So, simply put, the role of Israeli tech company called Waterfall Security Solutions, of course, in Minnesota's water system. How interesting, right at the same time, we're told

Starting point is 02:43:52 that Minnesota's having weird Iranian attacks, which make no sense for their actual agenda. And as she writes, well, it's stacked with former IDF soldiers who previously held leading positions in their military. It's, this is not some kind of like ubiquitous thing that we pluck out and make about one thing, guys. It is exactly what it looks like. And it's exactly what they tell you it looks like

Starting point is 02:44:13 if you actually listen to them. Now, I can't prove to you that that's what ultimately is the result, that it was, you know, that this is what caused that because of objective and that's not what I can prove here. But what I can prove is that a group that does this, you, like, as a matter of policy and literally brags about creating fake front companies to manipulate supply chains and everything else in the location stacked with the

Starting point is 02:44:37 people who are bragging about that, rather a company stack, in a location where something just happened that is in the interest of Israel, not Iran. I mean, come on. Question it, of course, because we should, but just recognize how clearly that is screening in one direction. Now, like I said the other day, Iran's IRGC has been dismissing Trump's claims of back channel talks as lies, just one embarrassment after the next as Trump has, I mean, are we still pretending like a Ron's lying at this point, guys?

Starting point is 02:45:04 How can we possibly be doing that? As I've said, it's verified itself at this point with everything we can see. Trump is lying or being lied to and he's too afraid to admit whichever way it's going. So Trump says he'll launch the most crushing economic up. Oh, we're back to that. I thought you were going to bomb them into oblivion. I thought you were going to, you know, insanely embarrassing. Now we're back to sanctions?

Starting point is 02:45:24 You mean the same maximum pressure? Maximum doesn't mean some. It means all that didn't work. So now you're going to have the maximum plus campaign? I mean, guys, this is sad. And guess what they did when he said that? Well, Iran were warns of further defeat after Trump's economic D-Day announcement. And Ghalyboff simply said that the evidence of them shifting to sanctions proves they've lost.

Starting point is 02:45:49 And that's been segue today into something even bigger. We'll talk about next. But don't forget, Marjorie J. Green has already stated that they're talking about nuclear weapons, which could be a lie. could, I don't, who knows, I don't think, I don't trust this person. I don't trust anybody in politics at this point. But either way, it's logical, sadly alarmingly, but clearly this is where, right now, they've lost.

Starting point is 02:46:12 And that's kind of what I expect from people like what we've seen from these two governments. So it scares me. I hope it's wrong. But realize that she's stating it. And that's why I thought it was relevant simply because it's something that also lines up with likelihood, rather just what they're capable of, I should be clear. But that worries me. Trump says he views the straight of Pramuse as American territory.

Starting point is 02:46:35 21st. Yeah, that's how you win. We named it our thing. I think really what this amounts to is pretending like if you just call it yours that somehow you won. I don't know. He's made more, less desperate moves that I can tell. Ormoose letter says Axios claims, of course, you know where that goes. So far, they're over whatever.

Starting point is 02:46:57 They fail lie over and over and over. And everyone keeps catching it. They just keep doing it. How is that platform exist or Barack Ravid have a job? Well, you know why. Not because people believe them. Axios claims 40 oil tankers cross the Strait of Pramus through the southern Omani Corridor, the one that's supposed to not be connected with Iran, carrying around 16 million

Starting point is 02:47:15 barrels of boil out of the straight. However, of course, as usual, Kepler vassal tracking data, which uses satellite imagery, rather than just the tracking system, shows completely zero west east tanker. They lie for a lump time. Again, as he pretended 20 tankers went through in the first couple of days of this. this, it didn't happen, which, by the way, if it did, would belie the idea that there was minds. But, you know, he's lied about everything, guys. So all comes to the point of today, Iran says, the world has approved our victory. And this is going to bother the hell out of him.

Starting point is 02:47:46 Now, I haven't looked to see his response. I'll follow up with the next show. But think about this. They're going, we want. It's over. And they're right. And so at this point, now it's just going to look like Trump maintaining the problem, which is pretty much what it's been this whole time. Iran's president said Friday, the war between the U.S. and Iran should end because the world's accepted their victory. The entire world approved our victory and the U.S. is hated. He's not wrong, guys. And they're talking about the government, not Americans. It could overlap today.

Starting point is 02:48:18 But clearly the point is people see what's causing this. But if you really look around and get out of the bubble, it's pretty damn clear that people realize what's happening. President Trump announced Wednesday that his administration would unleash the, quote, most crushing economic deal. it was embarrassing. I think it's important to really stand back and look at, you know, I mean, this is going to be in history, one of the most embarrassing presidencies of this, if not the, in this country. That's not a partisan statement. It's just objective reality of how, I mean, it's not just failing and not delivering. It's embarrassing. The way they conduct themselves, the stumbling over what they do, the lying straight to your face when we all know you're lying,

Starting point is 02:48:58 MS-13, or being wrong, you know, whatever those things are. It's embarrassing. That's why conservatives are seeing and calling it out too, guys. This will be an economic D-Day, he said, and we'll need all of our allies to stand up with the, ah, okay. So the real last-ditch effort was to go help us. You know, when he said before that we don't need your help, well, now we do, because they always did. So they need the allies to come and support them and use their economic attacks to basically isolate Iran.

Starting point is 02:49:25 Well, it might work if you had everyone in the world against them, but that's not what happened. It's what Netanyahu, I argue, convinced Trump would happen. Shut the straight down. The whole world's on your side. And then Iran did not do it. That's why day one, all the Western media, the strait's been shut down. And I proved to you it did not. Until much later in the conversation when it ultimately really did get shut down like it is mostly right now because of what the U.S. did.

Starting point is 02:49:52 And even now, it's not technically completely shut, as we'll show you as Iraq has been allowed to go through and so on others had too. Now it says the trading passage, which carries around the fifth of the world's oil and plenty more than that, consumption on a daily basis during peacetime has been effectively closed. According to them, again, effectively is true. But ultimately, we can show you again today that more has continued to go through that they are allowing. Iran and Oman have joint jurisdiction over the critical waterway. The Hill rights, and I agree, but Trump has threatened to make the straight a U.S. territory. You realize how embarrassing that is? So the point really comes down to the fact that even U.S. media is admitting media left or right that clearly supports the war against Iran, that Iran and Oman have jurisdiction and control.

Starting point is 02:50:38 And it says it is a one-two punch, Trump says, we have the blockade and we have sanctions. Yeah, so nothing new is your new plan? Yeah. And it says it is going to work in Iran and we're going to collapse regime and we'll have unicorns and puppy dogs. It's cool. It's going to, we're going to win. Okay, wait a minute. It's going to work and they're going to collapse. You mean the country you've told us has been lost and collapsed since the first day?

Starting point is 02:51:07 Then you just say they're already gone? And I mean, I don't even need to make the point. You already know how stupid this is. If he's, we want and now we're about to win and we're going to make a deal. Now it's over. It's just stupid. Suggesting they were at a means for, suggesting they were a means for a Trump administration to distract from domestic

Starting point is 02:51:25 concerns about the cost of living, Iran, saying what this in their mind is about trying to distract Americans away from the fact that we're suffering because of his failure. It says doubling down, the so-called economic E-day is a diversion from Americans' own crisis, unprecedented debt and surging interest costs. Now, they're right. Whether it's that what's causing it or not, I believe it is. The point is that we all feel it, guys. Now, like I said, those that are really to lie, even as their own interests are being challenged,

Starting point is 02:51:54 who knows why team sport politics cult like mentality left and right i don't know but we all see the gas prices we all see the grocery prices we're not stupid doubling down on failed policies will only bring further defeat and an enmity of iranians which is already there u.s economic terrorism threatens global economy and sovereignty worldwide the conversation has changed which by the way this was before but this is why trump is threatening oman because what else you're going to do if you can somehow kick out one of the parties what's allowing them to have control of the street. Maybe you can disrupt this. But what does that do?

Starting point is 02:52:29 Disrupts everybody's everything. So Trump doesn't have to look like he lost. So if you care about Americans' interests, Americans prices, beef, gas, anything else, if you cared about the global stability, if you care about anything, that would not be your answer. But that's where we are. Egypt speaks with Iran after Tehran claims victory and other Middle East developments. Egypt is trying to now, this is today, trying to revive the negotiations, which it appears Iran is pretty much done with. Iran's president has said the world accepts that his country has won the war.

Starting point is 02:53:00 France and Saudi Arabia are expected to discuss plans to sort of bypass the straight, but I'm willing to bet you that that's not what ultimately happens if this gets resolved in some way, especially if this is basically back, back down to sanctions, and Iran starts opening the straight to anybody that's not actively against them, which is what I expect to be happening. It says France and Saudi Arabia are expected to discuss plans to bypass the street, where traffic has greatly slowed, not completely stopped, since the United States and Israel launched the war nearly six months ago. The illegal war that we all know has started with no justification yet somehow still continues.

Starting point is 02:53:34 Meanwhile, remarks by the U.S. ambassador to Turkey and special envoy for Syria appeared to contradict, interestingly enough, the official U.S. position on the Golden Heights. And Israel has carried out strikes against Syria and Gaza. Different parts, but relevant to the larger picture, if you follow this platform, Iran and Iraq have said both of the oil has been getting out. The governments of Iraq and Iran said Tehran has helped some ships carrying Iraqi oil to transit the strait. But there were a few details. There was a facilitation for some ships carrying Iraqi oil in the strait.

Starting point is 02:54:09 China has been doing the same thing. I can't prove how much and where and how often, but it's been proven that they've been getting through even the alleged U.S. blockade. Not like yesterday, but there's been multiple examples where it's been proven, according to the trackers, that China was getting through oil. A number of Iraqi oil tankers have been permitted to transit. Now, under the Syria side of this, an Israeli drone, they struck a vehicle in Syria and killed civilians. Several civilians, or excuse me, were injured and called to strike a flagrant violation of their sovereignty. We realize, okay, so you've got the Jolani al-Qaeda terrorists that they all support running Syria, allowing Israel them to do what they want, and if they're still bombing civilians?

Starting point is 02:54:49 Maybe that's just what they enjoy on their past time. Who knows? The Israeli military military, military Senate targeted a terrorist who advanced terror attacks in the final stages of preparation that nobody can prove. Sort of sounds like what they just did in this country. You know, we're just not even having some fake example just yelling out of narrative and bombing civilians and going bad guys. Terrorism about to happen. We stopped it.

Starting point is 02:55:07 Self-fulfilling prophecy. Pre-crime. In an interview on Friday with Mario Knopfal, you know, the real journalist of today, a Lebanese Australian entrepreneur, U.S. ambassador Tom Barach, oh, excuse me, that's what they framed him as. Lebanese Australian entrepreneur, Mario Nafal, or otherwise known as a blatant propaganda for the current establishment of the new media, U.S. Ambassador Tom Barack said,

Starting point is 02:55:31 Israel still occupies the Golden Heights in a violation of UN resolutions. Now, guys, there's only one or two things I see here, or maybe a few, but the point is, he either doesn't know that Trump is adamantly on the other side of this conversation, seeing as how it's called Trump Heights and he gave it to him illegally.

Starting point is 02:55:49 Or Trump has changed his mind and then he wants to make this a pressure point, right? I don't know. Or I guess it's just that these people are incompetent. They're not talking to each other. And this is the legal stance. So maybe he doesn't even know. I don't know.

Starting point is 02:56:03 But it says Israeli defense minister, Israel Katz, has said full of inaccuracies and the position that contradicts Trump's own position. See, you got Israel's government going, are you serious? U.S. ambassador? Trump is the one that gave this to us. It says the UN considers the territory occupied Syrian land.

Starting point is 02:56:19 It is. It's illegally occupied Syrian land. It's not considered anything. But in March 2019, Trump signed a proclamation recognizing his rarely sovereignty over the Golden Heights, reversing decades of policy. Let me see if I can get it to come up. There we go. Trump formally recognizes Israelic control of the Golden Heights.

Starting point is 02:56:38 There's a sign if you find it. Hold on. Let me find the sign just so you can see it. I'll include this too. Oops. Didn't that? That's weird. Oh, that's right.

Starting point is 02:56:48 Let me just do this. Wait, should that go back to the search? Did I close that? What? Am I crazy? Oh, I click the article, that's why. Trump Heights. Yeah, that's what happened.

Starting point is 02:57:05 Okay, let me see if I can find the article or the image. I'm sure it pops up. I always see it when I search. There it is. Trump Heights. I mean, how stupid it was the wrong one? Right? I mean, it's just crazy to me that that's,

Starting point is 02:57:18 so now he comes out and says they're illegally there. So we'll see what happens. My gut tells me they'll simply just pull back and let it keep going. Now this, to end. This is you caught another manipulator. Laura Logan says, note in 2024, Iran is not the real threat. That is a false narrative designed to drag us into another war. This time with Iran.

Starting point is 02:57:45 2026. Remember when they said Iran was not a terrorist threat? Ha! What a joke. Yeah, guys, so many charlatans out there playing team sport politics. You just got to just show discernment. Question me. Question anybody.

Starting point is 02:58:00 because then you won't be misled. Or, I mean, not in this, everybody will can and will eventually be misled. The point is that you'll eventually notice that. You won't be waking up 10 years down the line going, well, my God, I felt for some psychological trap. Because people show you who they are. I mean, you can, one or two things in my mind here.

Starting point is 02:58:17 Either you don't understand your own principles or you don't care about them, right? I mean, it's pretty clear. Now, we already made points about this from before. These statements they're doing, it's, you know, it's all over the map. Or, for example, a similar example of, I've just blanked her name,

Starting point is 02:58:34 the one that Derek had at a debate with. I mean, it was just a completely bad faith. It was so obvious to anybody not a blind supporter of them. Can't remember the name. I just almost had it. I can see it in my head. Naomi Wolf. And it was bad, guys.

Starting point is 02:58:52 It was bad. And it's worth watching. It's on Derek's website. But I'm telling you, there's a lot of them out there who are playing roles, like trying to inform you about the truth, and then ultimately just falling directly back into. what I think is an obvious dishonest stance. Worth your time to consider.

Starting point is 02:59:08 Clude all this wrap up there. Guys, thank you for tuning in today. Leave it there. I appreciate all your support. As always, guys, this is a people-funded platform, right? We put out this work, our product, if you will. You tell us what it's worth. As I keep saying, the idea of donations is something they're using to attack people.

Starting point is 02:59:26 And honestly, it's not even the best framing for this, right? Because we put a lot of work into this, it's valuable. whether it's just information. And if you believe that it's worth nothing and you, and then don't send anything. But please share it. Please continue. If you hope you enjoy it,

Starting point is 02:59:40 you believe it's worth the dollar, send the dollar. If you believe it's worth a dollar month, do a recurring dollar a month. The point is it's something we put out for that purpose because without that, this doesn't exist. So if you find value in this and you want to see this continue, just let us know what it's worth to you.

Starting point is 02:59:52 Because we're not going to stop. I'd like to continue to grow. And we've had a long patch of stagnation. In fact, we've had to take multiple steps back. because of all the different things you've seen us deal with. But we're going to keep going because we believe in you. I love you all. As always, question everything.

Starting point is 03:00:10 Come to your own conclusions. Stay vigilant.

The Last American Vagabond - Controlled Political Leak Pipeline Exposed, Trump's Mystery Beef & The Control Grid Materializes

There aren't comments yet for this episode. Click on any sentence in the transcript to leave a comment.