The Last American Vagabond - Data Centers CHOOSE To Use Fresh Water, Trump's Bumbling Iran War & The Impending Israeli False Flag

Starting point is 00:00:01 It starts with a simple question and ends in objective reality. Through our journey from there to here, we find one another and ourselves. And as the next 24 hours breaks free from our last, we gaze onward in reflection of the day. Tell me your own conclusions. Welcome to the daily wrap-up. Monday, July 13th, 2026. Thank you for joining me today. I have a hell of a lot to talk about.

Starting point is 00:00:46 A lot to get to. So I'm going to pretty much get past the preamble right now and just get right into it. There's a lot to cover. Pretty much, say for some of the more partisan kind of buzz talking points, I'm sure you know what I'm talking about. We're going to pretty much talk about what I think is most, what I think are most of the large conversations swirling around today. And I'm even going to briefly touch on something that,

Starting point is 00:01:06 pertains to Lindsey Graham that's not about Lindsey Graham or McConnell or any of these conversations that I'm not suggesting are not important, especially if something turns out to be kind of what people are theorizing about. They could be very important. I just find in this moment when it's still up in the air, there's a lot more that we should be focusing on. And I sense that there's parts of that that are being used to try to distract and get you kind of diving down the wrong rabbit holes. But we have a lot to talk about today. So I'm going to, you know, as the title just demonstrates, an important additional part to the data center point, the flock cameras is real. Ron, a lot to talk about. So I want to start with one thing to shout out again that I'm going

Starting point is 00:01:40 to continue to remind you as we get closer, July 24th. I think I might have said the 25th on an interview that was out, but the 24th in, it's listed as Nashville since that's the larger greater area, but Franklin within the greater Nashville area, Deanne's Gallery, we're going to be doing the activation tour arm of his larger tour in Franklin. I'll be hosting this one. It should be a great event. And we're flirting with the idea of potentially overlapping with another. protest because every time we've done this the last time we did this in franklin we did sort of a the activation tour and then we did a hit the the action arm of it where we go out and do some kind of a protest or clean up a beach or something like that it's different than every one of them we were

Starting point is 00:02:20 discussing just briefly about whether or not we want to try to do something around the data center a protest around one of the ones that are 30 minutes from for give or take depending on where you are like say Nashville so about 30 minutes from Nashville and this is one of the largest in the country. And it's insane. We're going to get into the picture I chose today and more about the data centers when we get past this. But I just want to make sure that if anyone in the area, anyone close enough to drive, if you support TLAV, come out and support this. If you support Derek independently, come out and support this. If you support the work we do together, come out and support this. If you know anything about us, come out and support this because it's

Starting point is 00:02:55 going to be a good event. And you know, Derek. You know the kind of things he puts on and the way he does it. This will be profound. It'll be important. It won't just be all politics. It's about the bigger, holistic picture of what we're dealing with, but definitely also politics. But make sure you check us out. Make sure you reach out to me if you want information, but just show up. Yeah, it's free to get in. There's no restrictions because that's how I think these things should be. And, you know, tune in here and Derek and also we'll be discussing that night what we might be doing the following day or maybe that night depending on actually, no, I do, I believe this goes later. So if it will be mostly, most likely the next day.

Starting point is 00:03:30 But come on, guys, show up. Show up for TLAB. Show up for Derek. Let's get 100. Hundreds of people in the streets, even though that's probably, you know, the, well, I'll leave it there. The whole point would be to make that let's get more people there than we expect. That would be great because, you know, Derek deserves this, the work he puts into this stuff, how much he cares about what he does. It's, it's unparalleled as far as I'm concerned in this field. So make sure you come out and check us out. Now, to get into some starting points that I wanted to share, this one is not connected to really anything else.

Starting point is 00:03:59 I just wanted to make sure you saw this. I saw it right before I went live. I just thought that was interesting. censorship, Twitter, any platform, really, I think that has an interest in, you know, got a sidling up next to the power structure. She reached out to me today and said, only verified accounts can reply to you on this platform. I'm pretty sure it's not coming from you.

Starting point is 00:04:16 Just to make sure it's out there. I did comment below this. It's not coming from me. That's insane to me. The idea that that would even be a thing that you would ask to happen. Why would you only want, I mean, that there's obviously there's a reason. Somebody doesn't want to engage with certain people. That's not what we do.

Starting point is 00:04:30 I want engagement with anybody who has a genuine concern. concern and conversation, not just attacks. But even that, it's open to anybody. But why that's something happening on this platform, I find strange. If you have any insight on that, let me know. If you know how I can turn that off, something I, you know, I think that's very strange. But I just said every, every say this platform, every day this platform is suppressing honest, objective, nonpartisan media. And it's every single day right in front of us. This, I just think, is some sort of a small additional thing that if it is activated, I certainly didn't do that. And I just think that's weird. So that means tons of people out there. And if you remember

Starting point is 00:05:06 the way this started, the whole blue check thing was the conversation after we were flirting with getting let back on when he went on took over. And I simply said as sort of an experimental direction, because we didn't know how it was going to go. If I get let back on, which I thought wasn't going to happen, I'll engage with the process. And that's only if it's not asking for new information. I was very clear about that. And then it happened. And I signed up for it. They didn't ask for anything new. And since then, I've said this every time. I never, other than the first time it happened, I don't think I've ever gotten charged for, which I don't know how to explain that. So I find that very, I think there's some kind of a weird overlap between the other ones I was

Starting point is 00:05:39 using because I was being censored and it wasn't some kind of circumvention thing other than the old platform that was censoring me and they let me back on demonstrating it was wrong that it happened. The point, though, is that up since then, the people, they sort of became the acknowledged point that, why are we going to continue to engage with this platform if that's what they're doing? So at this point, I wouldn't sign up and there's no point in removing it, you know, if you get what I'm saying. But either way, the point would be that tons of people who support this platform and watch this show didn't do that, which means probably most of the audience on this platform is not able to engage with me. It's just stupid. And reach out, let me know, criticize if that's

Starting point is 00:06:15 the case. Now, that all side, getting into some things to start from the actual show today, a couple quick points on health before we get into the next section. Oh, and actually just since I didn't really preamble, I just kind of wrote the, it's, we have a lot to talk about today. Endangered species, discussion from Donald Trump's administration, just more direction, which we'll get into here to start. U.S. Israeli merger, now just blatantly being called that by Netanyahu himself. I'm sure you've all seen the clip. We all know what this was. It's insane to me that he can go on Fox News and just openly frame it as a merger between the two militaries. That's not how they're supposed to say that because that is not how that's supposed to work. Any two governments, it's crazy. We'll talk about that.

Starting point is 00:06:57 Settlers in Rokana, I'm sure you've seen in the Israel Conversation. just the reality of what Israel is. Trump corruption. It's insanely obvious. Crypto and everything else. There's more point to talk about in there with the IRS, with the slush fun, flock cameras, data centers. We're going to follow up on more of those.

Starting point is 00:07:13 And one important point within the water, right? The idea that we'll get into it, but these are choices they're making. They don't need to be consuming insane amounts of fresh water. Do you know why they are? Because it would cost more for them to use water we don't want to drink, because it will cause corrosion and all the different. different things on there. That's, we'll go right into this. And I find that's, I mean, exactly where we are right now, that they know that and they know our concerns and they're

Starting point is 00:07:39 choosing. Now, it's starting to fluctuate the other way, rather just kind of, they're starting to lean, you know, some will try our best, we'll get into the, I don't think it's going to happen. It's appeasing us. But we'll get into ICE, AI, and Palantir in the overlap of that same conversation as it pertains to them with some new points. Iran, Israel, potential false flags, because this is a very real moment in history where Israel almost always steps in to do this. And the reason I framed it that way today is because it appears they've already taken place based on what we've already thought, that Israel is bombing some of these other countries to make it look like it's Iran, even though Iran has every right to be doing that. At least that's the allegation.

Starting point is 00:08:16 But I'm talking about the impending potential of what they may do here. But it really worries me, and this is not some kind of baseless concern. We'll talk about the Strait of Fremus and the oil, Lebanon, Syria, Al-Qaeda, and plenty more. So on health, Bonnie Hari, the food babe on Twitter. And this is a really good, I'm glad to see something like this because right now there's a lot of conversation about, I wouldn't call it blackpilled in the sense, if you don't know, it means simply, you know, what we were called unjustly for calling out where we are today before 2024 or 2025 was that ultimately means that you've given up. It's a simple way to put it. And look, there might be a world in which that is the way to look at it. I don't think that's where we are.

Starting point is 00:08:56 that if you're just like, well, they already did it. It's too late. You know, there's two, but we don't have any way to speak. If it was the situation, it wouldn't be wrong to call it that. I just don't think that's where we are. I don't think we're far from that, quite frankly. The point in this is that there's a lot of conversation that flirts with that, where, you know, why are we even fighting this because it's too far too gone

Starting point is 00:09:15 or that so many people are lost. And my point about the two-party illusion. And again, it's my opinion, but it's based on evidence. But it's my opinion that I think the, if it's not the majority, a hugely momentum is around the awareness of what these parties are, around what, at the very least right now, conservative seeing what the fake MAGA movement was, not the real version of them,

Starting point is 00:09:36 even if you disagree with what they fought for, but the fake version in the government and the fake media people around them that don't care about what MAGA was promised. They just pretend they're still doing those things. My point is that people get in this mindset that, well, nobody sees it. We're so lost. Maybe, but I think things like this show you that's not the case.

Starting point is 00:09:55 which is in this case around processed foods and health, despite what the government is doing and using the Maha movement, faking to do it the same way with MAGA. There's still people in the government that pretend they're doing it. The truth is the real Maha movement has been calling them out for a long time now. It's why you don't hear much about it. Same thing with MAGA is happening. But in this case, what it shows you is that despite the push

Starting point is 00:10:15 and we'll get into what Trump's administration is doing despite their promises with this very category in food and pesticides and glyphosate, is that people are still pulling away from it. shows you there's a momentum in the underlying population that's not being represented in the actions of the government. They clearly feigned this because they knew we wanted it, just like they're feigning America and liberty and freedom, but not delivering because the government doesn't want that, but they know we do. So they want to promise what we want and give you something different in the hopes that you pretend that's what you got and hope that the fake new media steps in and goes,

Starting point is 00:10:48 oh my God, this new liberty, freedom, technocracy is amazing. You know, that's what you'll get. My point here, as I'll read or tweet, the numbers are in. Process food is dying, a slow death and big food is crumbling. Now, I don't know if I feel that it's crumbling, but I agree with their sentiment, and I think this is the way it's going. There's a massive shift happening. Look at how much processed food companies have lost in value in the last 22 months. Now, fake MAGA will try to pretend that this is because of what Trump's been doing, and now it may have an effect. At least the feigned direction will probably even have some effect. I think this is what people really wanted. I don't think they're truly falling through with it. Stock value lost since August 2024. Campbell's down 54%.

Starting point is 00:11:30 Canagra, not familiar, but down 54%. Oh, Boyardee, Slim Jim, terrible stuff. Now, it may taste good, but it's horrible for you. GMOs, toxic, I mean, just you, the plastics and just horrible stuff. And just so you know, for those that always claim that this is all you can afford, you're wrong. The truth is that if you eat healthy and actually buy whole foods, it costs way less. It's always been a myth. you just but if you don't want to cook and put in the work i get that that's a choice but then don't complain about being unhealthy general mills down 47.6 percent craft 29 percent these are huge companies now you could argue too that there might be an overlap with the economy right but i generally still think this is a positive lamb weston McDonald's frozen fries 25 percent you get it pepsi

Starting point is 00:12:15 almost 20 percent these are good indicators that people are starting to one go in a positive health the reaction, at least as I see it. And two, see beyond the propaganda. It's a good sign, guys. Now, New York Times wrote this article. Trump ending, oh, wait, actually, hold on. I think I put this in the wrong spot. First, before we get to that endangered species point, I do feel is relevant to sort of the Maha direction. Maha food agenda undermined by Trump administration policies, right? Because what you might hear from some of them is, but they're helping. Their maha's doing all of that. That's why those things are happening. I don't agree. As this wrote in Forbes in June 16th recently, their own agendas clearly undermined by their own policies, which if you're paying attention,

Starting point is 00:12:59 you already see. The Maha movement's food agenda, the real people, you know, not what they ultimately did and claim, or what the people ultimately did, but what the people ultimately wanted, which was at least pretended, feigned to be spearheaded by RFK Jr. Or maybe he really did, but some reason he's not able to, is being undermined by certain Trump administration policies. environmental contaminants in agriculture identified by the Maha movement themselves as detrimental to the food supply have largely been deregulated. As you know, many of them, as I'll show you some of the articles we want. Glyphosate is an obvious example, things that were, as it writes right here, highlighted by RFK Jr.

Starting point is 00:13:38 The deregulation of environmental hazards, oh, it's right, glyphosate is one of such chemical that Kennedy has long criticized the use of. Okay, that explained to me why Trump makes it a national security imperative because they're not dishonest. Maybe R.K fought and we don't get to see that. I don't know. The truth is, it didn't happen. And RFK didn't scream about it. That's all you need to know, guys. I mean, it shouldn't say in an all-encompassing sense, but as it pertains to this topic, what else you really need to know? Then it goes on to say, pesticides and other contaminants have mostly been deregulated, which is a huge factor for what RFK was saying before this. The deregulation of environmental hazards and agriculture

Starting point is 00:14:17 goes against what Kennedy said in a campaign rally in 2024 for what Donald Trump was going to do. You can't get much more clear than that, guys. That's business instead of your health, which was always going to be the reality because that's who Trump is. He just knew that he could use RFK and frame these things and sell you on certain narratives and scream freedom in America and certain people would fall for it. Glyphosate is one such chemical. Glyphosate is cited in the Maha report that they put out as a major contributor in the rise

Starting point is 00:14:45 of chronic disease. It is a substance that may cause serious health problems and including cancer. Absolutely. And then Trump made it a national security imperative despite its health risks. And it says there's been considerable tension between Maha and the U.S. EPA over the continued widespread use and production of glyphosate. Specifically, no on food safety. Maha objectives appear at odds with EPA director Zeldon's decisions related to glyphosate. Or in general, for that matter, I just talked about new pesticides they were using.

Starting point is 00:15:14 Zeldon doesn't want to further regulate herbicide. Why? Because they have major connections with larger companies that connect through. I mean, it's just the industry. These people are pretending to care about what you want so they can get what they want done. That might as it'll be the definition of politics. So on top of that, Trump ending decades of protection opens wild habitats to drilling and mining. Now, some people may not care about that. I mean, frankly, it's on the larger scale of what's going on right now. It may be a lower thing for everybody. But we're still talking about things that matter. in a global sense in regard to the environment.

Starting point is 00:15:49 Caring about the environment is not some woke mindset. Making it about something that's not real is in that category, but understanding that what they're doing is destroying the earth that you live on is not a crazy thing to consider. It's just not about the what they want to make it about. But in this case, this is whatever you think about this, this is something that's changing longstanding policy for one reason. Profit, for money, for, you know, I guess the general category of money,

Starting point is 00:16:15 profit control, but money, I think is the largest point here. The Trump administration on Friday moved to open the habitats of imperiled animals to farming, drilling, mining, real estate development. I mean, think about just real estate. Why would that even be so people can make money? Who cares about those animals that are dying because of our other policies? Now, again, you may not care about animals, I don't even know why I have to qualify that. Doesn't it seem disgusting that people would just disregard living creatures because of what they

Starting point is 00:16:42 want? Yeah, it should. And if you feel otherwise, then maybe you shouldn't be watching this show. drilling, mining, real estate development, and other activities in what environmental is characterized as the most severe erosion of protections for wildlife in half a century. It did so by recasting a single word.

Starting point is 00:16:58 And this is so relevant, even if you don't care about this conversation. Harm. They simply re-imagined the word and its meaning. And see, this is how you get. This is how the whole legal system works. Where you have words that have very clear definitions, but when you look at the legal definition, you go weird, why is that,

Starting point is 00:17:15 words so different than what it means in our regular dictionary because they've bastardized it. They've used it. They've altered it. They've bent it to use what they want. In this case, the word harm no longer really means harm. It just means death. The Supreme Court upheld an interpretation in 1995 ruling against property owners who argued that harm should only mean when they were directly killed or injuring an animal specifically. But like, for example, you know, cutting down an entire forest they live in. Well, if we just shuffle into the side, they'll be okay. That's what they're doing. I'm sure they won't survive if you cut down their environment.

Starting point is 00:17:49 But, you know, this is how they alter the reality. Now, if you care or don't care, there's a legal principle here that still matters. But on Friday, the Interior Department of the Commerce Department announced a final rule that rescinded this longstanding interpretation under the rule. Then destroying an entire species habitat or a nest would no longer be illegal. Because, of course, they can just destroy their nest and habitat. I'm sure they would be just fine. I mean, it's just deliberately dishonest, guys. And if your argument was we shouldn't care about these lives over ours, at least there's logic to that.

Starting point is 00:18:21 This is just manipulation. It's what they do. And I'm not talking about one party or the other, ladies and gentlemen. Now, FDA walks back food dies is one conversation. Trump's new WHO and global organization that's building out, but the glyphosate article as well, and plenty of other who've already talked about. I just want to make sure we see where that goes. I could have combined that with the corruption part from today.

Starting point is 00:18:43 but the health part of that should matter because there was an entire base of promises that were laid out around that idea and they have just not just ignored it they've gone the other direction with almost every single one of them reduced the food dyes forced glyphosate giving you the shots and we're supposed to pretend like they mean what they say anywhere else i mean it's just they're literally willing to sell their grandmother for a nickel if they get what they want from it guys now let's talk about an overlap with lindsay graham i mean because frankly i'm not going to go through the whole rigum role in the idea. He's a terrible person. If we're afraid to say that he was a monster, then you're not being honest with yourself. You can sit there and mourn him all you want. I don't care. I don't even care unless it comes out about the reality that there was something behind this, whether it was Russia or Israel or whatever else, that matters. Matters. But I'm not going to play this game where it's up in the air and act like that's what we should talk about because I disagree. And I think people, I guess putting out broad assumptions based on what they think and not necessarily

Starting point is 00:19:40 the evidence, that's irresponsible in a sense that it's not just, like we consider to discuss as possible that Israel or Russia, that's not irresponsible, but there are people out there that are making it as a bigger case without the evidence. And I just find that to be, you know, for clicks, for engagement, and also for the idea that it's, you know, it's popular. But either way, it matters. I'm not trying to say it doesn't. My point in saying all of that is that I'm not going to go into the possibilities and all that and we have more to go on. I wanted to highlight this in the light of that happening with Lindsey Graham weirdly, passing away, which seems to be heart-related, which is probably because he took a shot.

Starting point is 00:20:14 I just, you know, who knows. I want to go over the weirdness of a few different things around Donald Trump, his administration, and this one starts with Graham, but plenty of others, just simply saying what they thought about Trump. You've seen these before, but I think it's important to think about now, even though we've already seen them. I mean, you can go down the list of everybody, Vance, Cruz, Drewbio, all of them are on the record going, Trump is a moron, he's a stupid person, he's a dishonest, he's corrupt, literally.

Starting point is 00:20:38 And I don't know why that doesn't matter. think that's the point here again today is that whether or not you think they were just saying it because they thought it would give them it. It means even if they don't hate them and they were saying it them because it would give them points. They were lying to you so they would get some points. And that's the point. Whatever they actually think, they'll say anything so they gain from it. So whether they support Trump now because they always did or they're only doing that now because they feel like they're gaining from it. It shows you these people will blow at the wind. And that's important to understand while they're driving this country to war.

Starting point is 00:21:06 for a minute. I don't know who you are and I don't know why you like this guy. Whatever he does, he accuses everyone else of doing. The man cannot tell the truth, but he combines it with being a narcissist. A narcissist at a level, I don't think this country's ever seen. And my concern is that he would grab up that power. Hardly. I think they're all in the same category. And really treat the country as sort of his little bully fiefdom. Donald Trump is everything I taught my children not to do in kindergarten. He's been exploiting working Americans for 40 years. He's a race-baiting, xenophobic, religious bigot.

Starting point is 00:22:01 He says he's for the little guy, but he's actually built a lot of his businesses on the backs of the little guy. Donald Trump the other day said that, quote, if he tells a soldier to commit a war crime, the soldier will just go to it. I don't think Donald Trump has even worked. read the Constitution, knows what's in the Constitution. Toxic mix of demagoguery and mean-spiritedness and nonsense. I just don't think most of them even believe what they're saying. I think it's because they recognize he was unpopular at a moment where they could exploit it.

Starting point is 00:22:41 I mean, I shouldn't say that, though, it could be right down the middle. I think a lot of them actually do hate each other. But it's not about that. It's about power. It's about control over your life. This cannot support Donald Trump. Donald Trump is a delusional narcissist and has a delusional narcissist and has a, an orange-faced windbag. Donald Trump is a con artist. He doesn't know the difference between truth and

Starting point is 00:23:01 lies. He lies practically every word that comes out of his mouth. I think he's a cuck. I think he's crazy. I think he's unfit for office. Right. As someone says in the chat, everyone out there in this video criticizing him are also monsters and also war criminals. We've covered this for a very long time. These people are all part of the same things. So whether they do or not is not the point, is it? It's about how they're willing to say whatever they need to say to get what they want in that moment. It's as simple as that. They're just bad people, guys. And this is what the world is beginning.

Starting point is 00:23:36 I mean, the world has become aware of that. Americans are truly starting to understand, not just that they're wishy-washy politicians that will lie, but they're much, much darker than that. And this is not about something, I mean, it's just the way to frame it, guys. We're talking about people who will openly advocate for genocide. I don't care what group you're in. I don't care where you stand. I don't care of a country you're from or your religion or your skin.

Starting point is 00:23:57 color. If you stand there and tell us that this is okay, you are a bad person and should be called for that, not just bad, not just criminal. Evil, guys. We're talking about people that are, whether religious or not, to a level that is beyond good and bad. You are watching and funding and cheering on and then gaslighting a genocide, then standing there and telling us that you are doing good. I don't know what else you call that. On that point, though, talking about Lindsey Graham, and part of that category, what I always think is so disgusting in the left-right paradigm. I'm talking about the people who are part of the team sport game, which I don't believe is the majority anymore. You get this kind of fake, you know, pearl clutching

Starting point is 00:24:37 or whatever you want to call it. Or whether fake or not, because I do think some of them actually don't even see it in themselves, where this is you calling them out. Spitfire says after what Mueller put this country through for absolutely no reason, good riddance. And so here's Anna Kasparean saying good riddance to Lindsey Graham. I hope you read. I hope karma reaches her quickly. You know, And you get this kind of point where you get or different kind of examples like this. Joey Manari or, yeah, Manarino, excuse me. Wait, man, man, manorino. How do you say that?

Starting point is 00:25:06 Anyway, Trump just said he doesn't feel sorry for Joe Biden's cancer diagnosis. This is the right answer. F. Joe Biden. F is prostate, right? Which good. You could say whatever you want, guys. It's free speech. The idea that you shouldn't be able to do that.

Starting point is 00:25:17 It's just so weird that the very people that defend free speech on both sides will come out and go, how dare you? You know, and look, you could make a point about decorum. But it depends on the. circumstances and also depends on the quality of the person. But Laura Lumer, Joe Biden sent January 6th to prison, detained them with, you know, blah, blah, blah, Biden, prison, whatever, shearing on the negativity, right? But it's, you've seen this.

Starting point is 00:25:38 Joe Biden got cancer good, you know, that kind of thing. So, Billy says, when Joe Biden got cancer, Republicans prayed, well, he just gave you like seven examples of how that's not true. And they're all a million follower accounts. But when Charlie Kirk was assassinated, Democrats celebrated, well, that's also not true. Some did. Some people yelled. Some people said day quorum.

Starting point is 00:25:55 It's just this game. play every time. I think most people are aware of it and it becomes obnoxious. But this was what happens. We are not the same. Yeah, you know what? You are not the same as average Americans. All you team support politics players on either side are exactly the same with a slightly different lens, but you are the same kind of person. I show you every day. But it's frustrating. Isn't it that they play this game of like reverence every time when they're not even really caring about it? On Lindsay Graham's point, Heretz comes out. Harz, Israeli newspaper and says, Lindsay Graham's death leaves Israel without a clear voice in Trump's ear.

Starting point is 00:26:29 I agree with James Lee. So are they just openly admitting that he was basically a mole for Israel? I mean, look at what he has been doing. I don't even think, I'm not going to say I can prove that it was a mole in a sense that he was like planted or manipulated, but it's clear he was very, very pro-Israel over the U.S. So it's a fair point to ask whether that's something, because Heretz has been pretty critical.

Starting point is 00:26:49 Is this supposed to insinuate that? You can ask yourself, but understand these people were wildly pro-Israel if they were ever even pro-America, but Israel first for these people. And that's what Americans are starting to understand. Now, this is a weird point that I wanted to make. You probably already saw it. First, Trump recommended Lindsey Graham's sister. Not a politician, his sister, for interim senator for South Carolina. There's tons of other people who are political, and I'm not advocating, I don't want any of these people. I don't want none of it even exist. The point, though, is if you're trying to look through this logically, there's tons of people. There's tons of people. I don't want any of these people. I don't want, I don't want none of it even exist. The point, though, is if you're trying to

Starting point is 00:27:25 people politically oriented with that situation who they could just shuttle into place. Ask yourself why you would choose his sister. And first of all, it's because there's no other family. I guarantee you if it was his son or something like that, it'd be the same thing. Now, you should be uncomfortable about that because this is not the British royal family. This doesn't make any sense unless you realize where we actually are, which I'll read this really quickly, which is that there is no such thing to these people as democracy. They do what they want.

Starting point is 00:27:52 It's the same reason you get Delci Rodriguez in Venezuela because democracy. No, they chose to put her there. There was no election. They screamed democracy the entire time and they still do because they either think we're too stupid to recognize that's not what it is. Not that we should even want mob rule democracy or government in general, but they either think we're too stupid or they don't care. Donald Trump on Monday urged South Carolina's governor to appoint late Republican Senator Lindsey Graham's

Starting point is 00:28:16 sister, Darlene Graham, Norton, to fill his Senate seat through the rest of the year. His death was the result, they claim of aerotic dissection due to are, what is it, arterioloric, cardiovascular disease. I mean, it doesn't always have to be connected to that, but these people claim they took one of these shots

Starting point is 00:28:35 that literally lead to stuff just like that. That should be a consideration. This would be a fabulous tribute to Lindsay, who loved her dearly, a tribute. What is this, a baseball team? What are we talking about? Senator Tim Scott also logged the support for grip. I mean, guys, this is just a slap in the face.

Starting point is 00:28:53 It really is. So much for, democracy, these people truly believe they are a special class, almost like what would happen with a royal bloodline. And you know what? There's some real conversation to be had about that, the most royal, what is the most, what is it, the most royal? What's the term for that? There was somebody did an investigation on this long time ago. Some girl got a lot of attention for it for doing a report in school. And you can look it up. It's not secret, even though everyone seems to disregard it, that almost every president in history connects back to a few bloodlines.

Starting point is 00:29:22 It's not secret. When Trump and Hillary were running, they were the only two that ultimately connected back to those bloodlines. And guess what? Those two ended up on stage. You could always disregard this,

Starting point is 00:29:32 but it's not a factually incorrect statement. And so it's weird to me that we see more of that. I think they see themselves as some kind of elite class. You could decide for yourself. I find that insane. Now, on top of that, others are pushing for Nikki Haley.

Starting point is 00:29:47 Owen makes a point here. The scripts went from network news to Twitter. I think he's right. I think we all see that. This is just the new, they recognize the independent media was gaining too much traction. So they took, they tried and are trying to take over podcasts and social media. They're just bowling their way in with this new media. And it's just, it is the mainstream.

Starting point is 00:30:04 Guys, what it is. Frankly, I think Owen might be a part of it. It's easy to see once you start it. Alex says, Lindsay Graham just passed away and influencers, in quotes, are already promoting Nikki Haley to replace him using the same exact language. Seems organic, right? Vince Langman, identical framing. It's not a secret.

Starting point is 00:30:20 guys, they are paid manipulators in most cases. And that's not even like a personal opinion. They have been caught in almost every, all these different circles of people getting influenced or budged or 7,000 from Israel. Now, saying that about Owen, I'm kind of being facetious. He did break away from them. But we should question that for sure, just like he should question it about me.

Starting point is 00:30:38 I mean, I wouldn't point to it if I didn't at least consider his opinion to be accurate. But I just think it's, we should be very, very cautious about the way this, even from a third level to this possible illusion. Now, here's the clip of Lindsey Graham going through and telling you how what a great person he was and how much he cared about human life. So when we were faced with destruction as a nation after Pearl Harbor fighting the Germans and the Japanese, we decided to end the war by bombing Hiroshima and Nagasaki with nuclear weapons. That was the right decision. Give Israel the bombs they need.

Starting point is 00:31:12 That's after, of course, they were already retreating, and you can prove that today. So you can decide for yourself whether it was about just seeing what happened, whether it was not scaring anybody else. Either way, easily identity. You could prove it to yourself if you actually care, and I've done it on this show. They were in retreat, and they did it anyway. This is the person we're talking about.

Starting point is 00:31:29 To end the war they can't afford to lose and work with them to minimize casualties. Can I say this? Why is it okay for America to not to drop two nuclear bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki to end their existential threat war? Why was it okay for us to do that? I thought it was okay. I'm sure people can educate themselves

Starting point is 00:31:49 on the reality of World War II. To Israel do whatever you have to do to survive as a Jewish state. God. Now, this guy, you know, anyway, it's not even worth talking about this guy. I want to play one actually thing. I forgot about this clip.

Starting point is 00:32:05 I had it in that shot. To the people talking about putting his sister in place. I just think, one, I think it's kind of funny, but let's listen to what he says, and I'll point out the funny part. Today under the law is my duty. to an honor to name someone to serve in the place of this irresistible man oh this irresistible irreplaceable man oops old man misread the statement let's just play it off like he meant

Starting point is 00:32:31 irresistible after he's dead good god man correct yourself be like my mistake i met you know these people are shameless guys i mean just think about the weirdness of calling him irresistible after. Nobody even smirked. They're a bunch of soulless people. This extraordinary man. Maybe that one guy back there. For the remainder of his term, Lindsay took care of his little sister in years long departed. It's my honor to ask his little sister, Darlene Graham. God. To finish. Aristocrats, my honor to establish the new leader of the South Carolina. I mean, these people are just, you know, that's a very pert, I'm making a joke, really, but they're

Starting point is 00:33:12 There's a class thing here for these people. Either way, the bottom line, I'm willing to argue that the reason that she's being pointed to is because she has certain opinions that they want carried forward. I just think that is a very, very clear thing that they're doing there that should anybody who cares about the reality of even what they claim they think they believe in, we should be calling this stuff out. And this list off a bunch of other points he said as well. 2022, somebody should take out Putin.

Starting point is 00:33:40 You see, think about saying a thing like that. And if this was in fact some kind of an assassination, which I don't think is verified at this point, it's a bunch of speculation. It's, you know, or Iran, for any of these people. Like, you've been murdering and cheering on the death of their families. It's not about saying good or bad or agree or not. It's about understanding why it might take place for that reason. Are we going to pretend that if this happened to people, if they had killed the Pope and

Starting point is 00:34:03 then murdered Trump's family, you don't think he would have flattened this whole country to the ground? I mean, my God, we have to understand these people are. 2023, Russians are, and that's by the way, why? in my opinion, Iran has not done anything inside the United States, despite having the legal reality to do so. Thank God they haven't done that. Russians are dying. Best money ever spent, he said, 2023. Gaza should be flattened, he said in 2020, 24. This is a Hiroshima, Nagasaki on steroids. Same thing, saying, do it, use what they did in World War II. We're killing all the right

Starting point is 00:34:33 people, he said in 2025. 2025. We will obliterate them over the Strait of Pramuse. Yeah, real good man. So Laura Lumer comes out and says this about Graham. Five days ago, Senator Graham posted about how the IRGC threatened to assassinate him, which by the way, probably because they're all murdering their families. But regardless, I don't think it's in their interest to do so. It would not surprise me if they did. I just don't think it's in. I think the very reason that Trump and the rest do what they do is because they know Iran is not what they claim they are.

Starting point is 00:35:01 Right? If they had nukes and were willing to murder everybody they could, do you really think they would keep doing what they're doing the way they're doing it? It just, I mean, it's, I think the whole point is that they're, they're calling their bluff in a sense, right? They know they're going to keep pushing because Iran is not going to up the ante. At least they believe that. At some point, that might break.

Starting point is 00:35:18 But that's just my personal reading on it, it's hard to say. But historically, just say April to this point, it's very clear that they have continued to show restraint and very clear that they have continued to play this politically. But continuing, it says, they threatened to assassinate me and President Trump as well with matching posters. No, what you're pointing to you, absolute child, is a bunch of random people, protesting with posters of the monsters in the other part of the world that they knew were killing innocent people in Iran. But to pretend that these were all government coordinated is your opinion. Again,

Starting point is 00:35:49 it wouldn't surprise me, just like we can point to a lot of things this administration have done doing that to people in Iran. Literally the same thing. These people, it's just, it's exactly what you get from people like Laura. She'll sit there and call for the death of anybody, but if you simply insinuate that she should have anything bad happen to her, she will cry like a child and she will scream about how you're threatening her and I, my life. is being ruined because she's a child. The point is that these people came out and said these things because, one, especially from our perspective, they had every right to say those things.

Starting point is 00:36:18 It doesn't mean that there's a crime taking place, but the idea that we took that seriously and we'll get to in a second, actually I'll see if I can grab it real quick. I forget where I put that. No, I think it's further down. Wall Street Journal. It already came out that inside the administration, they also agreed that the threats weren't even accurate. Surprise, surprise.

Starting point is 00:36:37 Israel's claim was false. Wow, that's shocking. Goes on. President Trump, it goes on to say, now Senator Graham is dead one day after returning from Ukraine. Russia sent a delegation to his funeral while in Ukraine. And by the way, so what she's saying is Iran because that works for her interest, right? Because Ukraine is real.

Starting point is 00:36:53 They don't want to talk there because she knows that Ukraine is involved with Israel and it's basically the same thing at this point. So with the U.S. and Ozav movement. So she wants to not make it about Ukraine and Russia. This is where it goes, in my opinion. While in Ukraine, Senator Graham's book about sanctioning Russia, recently Russia threatened to supply with nuclear weapons. This doesn't feel like a coincidence.

Starting point is 00:37:11 So, excellent point by Harrison. In fact, one of the best points I think about this conversation, he goes, whoa, whoa, whoa. Are you suggesting that a foreign power might have killed our civilian leadership? Who would do that? Who would normalize using assassination as a tool of war? Do you have any leads as to who could have started such an insane danger? You obviously, I mean, this is how easy it is to call out the shocking level of either stupid. pit at your hypocrisy of people like Laura Lue.

Starting point is 00:37:40 If you really pushed it, she would make the case that it's okay because those are Muslims and they're bad. That's what she goes to. That is where her logic takes her, if you want to call it that. What he's saying, in case you miss the point, was that that is what the U.S. and Israel did. They targeted, and I'm talking levels upon levels of innocent people, whether we're talking about people like Kameenia as the Pope Revelation or innocent Iranians on the ground, or innocent people in Beirut on the ground, or the levels of people within the civilian leadership. just because they called it all evil Irani, you know, this is the point, guys. And look, you may even agree with that.

Starting point is 00:38:12 The point he's making is that, well, they did that. So why is it wrong for them to at least even incinuate the same thing in response? Because of what I just said. It's all good when they do it. It's all wrong when anybody else even points to it because these people are hypocrites. Now, talking about the merger, which is where this really goes and what I think people like Laura are desperately trying to advocate for without saying it is the ongoing I guess occupation, if you will, an overtaking of this country by the obvious interest of Israel and

Starting point is 00:38:43 Zionist agenda. It's not secret. Now, we were at a point before this when we were telling people because I thought the facts back this up. And of course, as a lot of people well before me, have been censored and attacked and just for pointing to the obvious. Now we're at a point where it is on the central conversation. It is being forced into your mind. I mean, well, I could sit from the partisan side of it about somehow necessary for in one way stopping funding to Israel. See, we hear you, which is what they always do. It's not what's actually going to happen. But the game is to try to make this about anything other than the reality.

Starting point is 00:39:18 But at a time when most Americans are going, my God, Israel is jamming itself into this country in a way that will never be removed. They come out and go, hey, let's merge our militaries. And that's again, the opposite of what was originally framed by this. Now, we covered this on the 20 on June 3rd. And again, well before this, as we say in this, in this discussion, new NDAA further integrates the U.S. and Israeli militaries. Even, you know, and I'm glad it's getting a lot of attention. But some people are seeing it just now and sort of framing it as a breaking story.

Starting point is 00:39:47 You know, to what happens in this field, you know, in the bad side of it on social media. But I'm glad it's being pointed to. Like this even, even for even there was a new part of it on May, in fact, which is not new. It's June, right? But nonetheless, it's still important that we're seeing that. We have the Senate version of it. We have the House version. And it's all passing, right? Republicans on either side. And the reality is, I think it's going to,

Starting point is 00:40:09 regardless of what we want. But as Joe Kent says, who we just had an interview, by the way, with Matt Agrist and Joe, excuse me, Jason Bassler on the Free Thought Project, this week the Senate will vote to merge our military's most sensitive and secretive capabilities with Israel. I just don't even understand how this can be so publicly discussed. You know, I mean, I take it back. We all see it. That's what I actually think. I think nobody is, confused about this and you have people to support it or don't. Even though it's like a, it's like a vaccine conversation. It's like a data center flop camera conversation.

Starting point is 00:40:41 We could have 90% of this country walk up to the, you know, hypothetical local county meeting and go in there go, we don't want this. And they'll go, okay, and then do it anyway. It's the same thing, no matter what level you're looking at, guys, these people don't seem to care about us. This merger is buried within the massive NDAA that they're hoping you won't notice, but everybody already does. This has been at the top of the conversation for weeks now.

Starting point is 00:41:01 merging our military with a foreign country is a treasonous betrayal of our sovereignty. How do we not see this as the U.S. being taken over by Israel? I mean, I just don't even understand how it can be seen any other way with what we have been seeing this entire time. The merger is buried within the massive NDA. Merging our military is a betrayal. Call our senators, call your senators and tell them to vote no on the NDAA, which I don't think they care of what you do. Tell them what we will never support merging our military, the foreign nation. Yeah, I mean, I agree with them.

Starting point is 00:41:30 I just don't think they care. The Senate switchboard number is right there for you. Here's what Chris Menahan shared on Fox News. Netanyahu just brazenly saying this that we need to merge our militaries. And on top of that, reason, well, you know, funding. Well, you understand that once they merge, it's not about not getting funding. They have access to all the funding. It just no longer goes on the data on the sheet as Israel funding.

Starting point is 00:41:54 You don't see how obvious that is. And this is what they always do. Oh, Smith-Mont Act, right? You don't like respying. Okay, we'll modernize that act. And now it's okay, right? We made it legal to do the thing we were fighting. No, no, you can't do that.

Starting point is 00:42:04 Well, too late, we did it already. Smith-Montarization Act was not changing anything. They just legalized what they claimed they weren't supposed to do. Water Powers Act. I mean, this is what they do. They make it legal what we were pushing back against, and they look at you like they solved the problem. Prime Minister, do you have a timeline by which you would like to see that U.S. foreign aid down to zero?

Starting point is 00:42:30 Yes. It's military aid, actually. Yeah, we were talking about beginning it this year and going for 10 years, but we might shorten it. That was something, by the way, that I did when I was first elected and came to Congress. We had financial, not military support, but financial aid to Israel. And I said on my first speech before the joint session of Congress that we're going to bring it down to zero. And we did that in 10 years. Every year, went down until it finally disappeared.

Starting point is 00:43:01 You know, we could talk about that model. We're talking about that with the administration right now. Well, Prime Minister, will that drawing down of foreign aid from the United States to Israel be compensated by the proposal to have a merging of some sort between our Pentagon and your military? Yeah, I'm calling it from aid to partnership. So we take away the money that is given to Israel, which is, which is, which is, one part, but the other part is we invest, co-invest in equal measures in the new technologies that are needed to give our military and your military the advantage. So we want, there are some unbelievable projects. So we invest jointly and take the fruits equally.

Starting point is 00:43:52 You move from aid to partnership, and I think that represents what Israel is. And remember, the other thing is that we share with America unbelievable intelligence to save America. American life. General Keegan has said that when he was working in American intelligence, what Israel was giving the United States was worth, he said, five CIA's. I don't, I'm not trying to be mathematically exact, but Israel's contributions to America's defense are important. Our technology is incredible. And since yours is incredible too, and you're the great champion of liberty and free markets, I think the meshing of our, two great countries of talent would strengthen.

Starting point is 00:44:38 So they're not even attempting to hide this anymore. They're openly trying to sell you on the merger of the two countries. I mean, it's almost like they're just literally admitting what we've always been telling you. No matter which way you look at this, it's just over the top. And I want you to think about what he said, the liberty and freedom. I mean, guys, these are the two groups leading and supported by most of the West, leading genocidal efforts in Lebanon, in Syria, in Gaza, and they're the ones that are going to guide us to the future of liberty?

Starting point is 00:45:08 There's other comments that's going to make there, but I was dealing with some kind of a weird issue with, I had to open a new window on a different browser to be able to add more videos. Who knows why? So I'll let you make the determinations you will. There was at least two other points I was going to make, but I don't want to play it over again.

Starting point is 00:45:20 I'll let it finish. In the America's position, competitive position, both in the economic marketplace and in the military battlefield in many important ways. So that's the idea. The idea is to take away aid, one-sided aid, and move it into, you know, bilateral investments for common benefit. Oh, bilateral. Oh, so investments, right. So no aid, you'll just be investing in your own thing.

Starting point is 00:45:45 See how perfect that works out? So the billions you get will be yours again, even though we'll use it and probably ask for more. It's just a blatant manipulation. And it's almost, I mean, look at it. My personal opinion is he thinks, this is how. how dumb they are. How much that we just showed you that quote. This is how easy it is to move the United States. There's a quote from it on the Washington Post from years ago. He brags about being able to manipulate the U.S. power structure. Not with us anymore. People don't buy it.

Starting point is 00:46:14 Insane. As Chris writes, oh, he just quoted. I thought he, oh, maybe that was a different post. Anyway, the point is obvious, guys. And Joe's calling it out. People see it. It's not a secret what's happening right now. Now here, to get into the overlap of this, and this is what I think is part of this, guys. We're a point now where there is, is a, you know, think of it like the Charlie Kirk moment. You know, there's a, they're on the, they're walking in knife's edge, whether it's the Iran war or the completely, you know, debilit, the loss of support to a debilitating level from this country for Israel, that I'm worried that there will be some

Starting point is 00:46:52 kind of an event as usual to coalesce the support. So here is what John Kierakow's pointing out on that side of it, which is something we already know. And this should not, first of all, to make it clear, historically, this is, what Israel is known for. You can listen to people like Wilkerson or others who have worked alongside them or Kira Kow himself, who will tell you that it's not just what they're known for. This is what they are.

Starting point is 00:47:15 It's a culture. And I'm not talking about just every, I mean, in fact, I'm not even relating to Jewish religion. It does overlap most clearly, but talking about the Zionist agenda and the Israeli government and what they're, what they've created is culture. It's sort of like looking at the culture of the militarized U.S. government. That's not Christianity. it's clearly just what the culture they've created,

Starting point is 00:47:37 but they try to wrap it in this gross lens or wrap it in the blanket of Christianity, which just should be insulting to you. But here he's talking about the police stations that are utilizing Israeli intelligence or Israeli military to train them with everything we know that's happening right now. And also whether that would be setting a potential insight.

Starting point is 00:47:56 Think about if that was Iran or China. What's the first thing people would consider and worry about rightly so? What if they're doing something? What if they're organizing something? some kind of internal plot while they're internal, like, completely meshed in with our system and training our enforcement arm. Maybe we should wonder about that. Most mainstream outlets don't talk about is that the Israelis are already in the United States training local police departments.

Starting point is 00:48:22 We know, for example, that the Israelis are training the Atlanta police, that this area now called Cop City is the site of Israeli police and Israeli IDF training our own police. I don't want the Israelis training American police departments. The Israelis have no respect for human rights or civil rights or civil liberty. He's right. I mean, it's obvious. He can so casually state that one, and he's on, he's on her show. But at the end of the day, guys, this is what people see.

Starting point is 00:48:54 I don't think that's even hard to see right now. As the patriotic blonde rights, CIA officer John Kirichow says the Zionist regime is actively training U.S. police departments, infiltrating law enforcement. She writes for a prepared takeover. Well, you could certainly look at it that way, couldn't you? We played this many times. Here's a clip, first of all, from going underground, interviewing it's Dennis Fritz, C.M. A sergeant in U.S. military talks about the idea of whether Israeli false flags might be a potential issue here.

Starting point is 00:49:26 And then on top of that points to the attacks and will come back to it with Iran that have carried out in the back and forth and whether or not some of those were actually faked by Israel or used to blame Iran. be expecting false flags and should we expecting that, I mean, Iran was claiming that some of the attacks on GCC countries were not by them, were actually Israeli attacks, disguised as Iranian attacks. Should we take all these claims as seriously as someone might who was focused on the USS Liberty? I don't know whether when you were at the Pentagon, this was canteen talk and people widely understood what Israel did to murder. so many American servicemen on the USS Liberty. Yeah. Hey, listen, if I've always stayed in the past, I can give you facts, assumptions, and opinions. And more so, I've given you facts, you know, but when we talk about some of the attacks on our GCC countries, you know, were done, maybe not done by Iran.

Starting point is 00:50:32 Well, I'm giving an opinion. I believe that. I believe that some of those tax may have been done by Israel and particularly Massad. I really do believe that. Now, I'm just giving an opinion there because I don't know that. But then also I'm based on Iran didn't take credit for some of those attacks. And so I don't know. Again, even though they would have a legal right to do it, that makes a lot of logical sense.

Starting point is 00:50:59 Why would they deny it if they have a legal right to respond to countries that are on the record, co-belligerents in this war, which means they have a legal right to respond to them. That makes sense. But there's an argument that there's points at which, and this is where you should consider that is the ones that they might argue bombed the location, which doesn't seem in line with what Iran's doing elsewhere. But you shouldn't also be, you shouldn't dismiss the possibility that Ron would bomb something that it's a war crime.

Starting point is 00:51:23 I don't. I think it's very, any government is capable of doing it if they saw it in their interest. But what's in their interest? It's like arguing that Assad gassing people for no reason was somehow in his interest. He wasn't the maniacal lunatic. they framed him as. You can easily prove that. The point was they made those stories up to justify what they did. Not that I would argue he's not capable of it if he needed to in his own interest. I just don't think that was the case of the time. Behind the scenes,

Starting point is 00:51:48 the bombacies that the Iranians were telling the U.S. that, that, hey, we were not responsible because they have not come out and said it. Even this latest attack we had recently with a number of shifts that were hit, Iran has really not come out and say, hey, we truly, did that though they have discussed about, hey, they will control the straight and they will have coordination by shifts that want to, you know, enter through the straight. But I will tell you, based on past history, based on some of the things I've seen in the Pentagon and some of our cooperation with Israel, I do think some of those attacks were possibly done by Israel intelligence agencies. Now, in regard to the point of the ships, well, we know that at least in some of the cases, they have openly said, yes, we did that and you can clearly prove that. But this is what I've talked about.

Starting point is 00:52:41 He's talking about in a general sense of this entire event, you know, from when this February to now, I said this in the beginning. There were many examples. We're right in the beginning because it will see, right now you have a different circumstance. Right now, Iran has an agreement that Trump signed that gives them the right to set up this organization. And then Trump tried to sneak, and I'll get into that in a minute, try to sneak ships by to try to hold off the damaging situation they put themselves in with a little bit more oil

Starting point is 00:53:06 to stave off where it goes. And that's some of the ones you've seen them sneak through. Most of them happened and also lying about that. But I'm arguing is, and now the point is Iran has every right to stop the ships and they weren't sinking them. They weren't stealing anything. They were firing on them to turn them around. And they did.

Starting point is 00:53:21 That's what happened every single time. And what you can see, as I've shown you, the videos, where they're going turn around. That's audio and a video of them saying it on the radio. Turn around. You're going the wrong route. This is not the agreed upon route. Trump signed that and then you turned out that Trump's trying to work them around the other way. This is all manipulation.

Starting point is 00:53:36 So they are the ones violating this agreement. The point is that what I think he's pointing to is the beginning when that wasn't the reality. That's a point in which it was in their interest to make it look like Iran was arbitrarily shooting on ships. And they never claimed those things. I think that's exactly the point. I think it's very relevant. Now on top of that, just on the false flag note, play the clip, I always will. Or I think they were buying it from.

Starting point is 00:53:58 We have an incredible array of possible. of creating foreign companies that have no way being traced back to Israel, shell companies over shell companies who affect the supply chain to our favor. We create a pretend world. We are a global production company. We write the screenplay. We're the directors, where the producers,

Starting point is 00:54:22 we're the main actors, the world is our stage. Did you see any surprises in Gaza? Surprises? Yeah. Like the intelligence surprises. Pages, walkie-touchers. Do you know how many equipment? I mean treated equipment that we have in these countries.

Starting point is 00:54:34 You can't, you're not. I do. You mean, I do? You mean, you mean booby-trapped equipment? Not only booby-trapped and spying. Manipulated equipment. All right. In which countries you're talking about? All the countries that you can imagine. Important to think about that in the larger picture, right? That Israel can't seem to stop bragging about how it can do what it wants,

Starting point is 00:54:56 wherever it wants, whenever it wants, including planting booby-trapped equipment in every country you could imagine. So if some major event takes place in the United States, maybe consider the Israeli involvement. I mean, it's just a no-brainer at this point, not assume, but consider. I mean, I can again, show you the different examples, the Israeli documentation where they outright argue that they have a right to legislate anywhere in the world, where they have a right to ignore international law anywhere in the world. I mean, it's not even hidden. This is what's so incredible.

Starting point is 00:55:25 You can, they'll proudly, like Smotrich Ben-Gabir, will openly yell at and, you know, advocate for those things. And you can see it's not just the two. It's sort of like the support for the war. It's a very open majority conversation from their government that these people should die. It's not even secret. But you'll have the conversation from the leaders elsewhere, you can call them that, who will just lie to you, whether they're being bribed or blackmailed or they're too stupid or they've been tricked or they're scared of being called an ex-semit.

Starting point is 00:55:52 All of it combined. The entire power structures of the world are just lying to you, even though it's that obvious. crazy. Now, a quick point, I'm not going to play the whole video about Celebrite. And the fact that this seems to be a central thread along most of these, what I would argue, seem to be cover-ups or alteration of events through their, you know, manipulation of the data, whether we're talking about Butler, Charlie Kirk, any number of examples. And I've covered this just recently went over the many different examples of this, or Clearview AI or like all these different Israeli intelligence entities that are jammed into.

Starting point is 00:56:29 to the U.S. control structure. As Pauli George says, they've used Celebrite, Celebrite, Cellbrite, in the Butler assassination attempt case as well. This is from Tucker Carlson. This is the one I was just showing you, right? In regard to the Tyler Robinson discussion, he's on the stand and he admits that they used.

Starting point is 00:56:47 Celebrite. In Israeli intelligence application to get the information off the phone that they then later argue was the proof that he admitted to everybody via text. Certainly seems a little bit suspicious especially what we know now, isn't it? Doesn't it? Here's what Tucker was saying. A new talk screen because the body doesn't exist. According to Higgins, quote,

Starting point is 00:57:11 this action by the FBI can only be described by any reasonable man as an obstruction to any following investigative effort. Another notable detail is that photos from the day after the shooting show an FBI agent hosing down the site where crooks died. High-level intelligence officials and congressional sources told us this is very strange, that the FBI usually hires out crime scene cleanup to third party contractors. But in this case, they did it themselves, leaving no blood and no tissue for anyone else to analyze. In the photo, the agent shirt said, even that alone, you know, these are, of course something could explain that. It's something that we somehow still haven't gotten information about, but just any honest person has already acknowledged that this whole

Starting point is 00:57:57 thing is completely dishonest. Now, whether that amounts to one thing or the other is still debatable because of the way they've handled this. But it's just obvious. I don't know why that's not admittable by some people. And I mean, even people that are starting to see the problem with this administration. It's just this weird adherence. But there's so many people of the fake new media that are absolutely still lying to you about all these things, including Butler. He's from the technical hazards response unit, a unit that collects traditional forensic evidence contaminated with hazardous materials. After the shooting, the FBI sent Crooks' phone to the Bureau's laboratory at Quantico, Virginia. Agents there were able to open it in less than 40 minutes

Starting point is 00:58:37 using technology from an Israeli tech firm called Celebrate. According to the post, FBI officials who served under President Joe Biden accessed Crooks' phone. Biden and Trump. See how it's always the same? Phone, computer, and his encrypted messaging apps in Belgium, New Zealand, and Germany. Yet none of the online activity the FBI's discovered was referred to in any way in the final congressional report that was released in December of 2024. By the way, why do we still know nothing about that guy in Butler? What's going on? That was a good question, a question that most people thought would be answered by the new administration. Within weeks of retaking office, Donald Trump told the New York Post's Miranda Devine that he had, quote, ordered the Secret Service on Friday to provide him every bit of information about his two would-be assassins. You've had two assassination attempts.

Starting point is 00:59:27 One, obviously, where you got hit by that bullet in Butler. There's a lot of frustration that we still don't know about that shooter in Butler. And we don't have to know about his communications. We get stonewalled all the time asking questions, got it. Is there frustration on your part? Will we get transparency? Will we know the bottom line story? It's very interesting because we have great people.

Starting point is 00:59:50 I think Pam is incredible. I think cash is. Yeah. Funny how that changed, isn't it? Incredible. And they're doing a great job. They're being recognized as doing a great job. See, I mean, he's like how shameless that is.

Starting point is 01:00:03 Even though we now know that it's something that he, in fact, was the, you know, don't make, this is an obvious cover up from every possible angle. And even as the Fox News, like, asking him, like, why we get Stonewall? They're like, oh, they're just great people. So you're the president. Can you find out? No, no, I know, I know, I know. I'm relying on my people to tell me what.

Starting point is 01:00:24 What a weak person. I mean, this is my point in my opinion, he's just lying. He knows. And so he's putting it on them because that's what cowardly leaders do. But as people insist, there's nothing there, and they don't seem interested in finding out more. How come we don't have more information on the assassination attempts on President Trump? There's two reasons. These two clowns.

Starting point is 01:00:47 What an embarrassing moment for this country. Two open ongoing prosecutions. But we have personally invested our time. and making only one of them is still here by the way case you'd know that sure that we have looked at all the any possible international connections to terrorism and adversaries alike and we've both been down to quantico we've both done the laboratory testing we've both seen the explosive analysis we've places and went to steps and stuff because we're real and we really are what we think we're actual authority right can't you tell by my high chair that i'm sitting in how embarrassing

Starting point is 01:01:18 like just an absolute embarrassment across the board now aside the cell celebrate was the point that i I wanted to make there, the connection back to Israeli intelligence as we continue to see the obvious cover-up that this is. Because realize that's where you get the one point they have, the one point about whether he admitted this. Even the argument that he confessed to his family seems to have been turned around. Now here is another example of this same kind of conversation as Dave Cohn points out. Prosecutors say to the judge, and I already mentioned this, I believe you asked for the actual shooting. There is no video of that, video of that. There's no actual video of the shooting of Charlie Kirk. And it's just this whole thing is insane.

Starting point is 01:01:53 and he puts the longer cut in here for you after watching Posovoic claim he watched the full video of Robinson actually get in position and shoot. I took one last crack at and ask Grock, where is the video? There's no publicly available high quality video clearly shows Tyler Robinson firing the exact shots and killed Charlie Kurt. Yeah, well, I guess I'll just move on. Posovic will lie to you for the rest of his life because that seems to be his job. But people care.

Starting point is 01:02:16 People can see it. Little attention. But the point overall, guys, is that this whole thing is built on false information that leans in one very clear direction. Charlie Kirk and the Israel connection is undeniable. We need to understand that. Now, talking about where this all goes. So we talked about this in, well, first of all, the celebrate point in regard to, you know, how it's immersed in all of this and connects back to flock and connects back to all, you know, all of the conversation we're going to have now. We talked about it in this show. So this was on the 10th. The flock revolution. Ice

Starting point is 01:02:49 continues violating the rights of Americans and Trump lies about Iran again. Now, most of which we're going to get into now. I'll point back to this in a second. Now, talking about first, Israel and Rokana, which this really does, I mean, whether or not you believe in Rokana, which I don't trust or believe in any of these politicians, or just recognize what this shows you regardless of what it was. I don't care of it's Lindsey Graham. It still shows you an American politician and the way that it's being treated, they're being treated by the group that's supposed to be their biggest ally. And look, if you don't know by now that these settlers are a government program that are backed by people like Gavir Smodrich and Netanyahu,

Starting point is 01:03:22 and that they absolutely defend them and work with them and facilitate their actions with the IDF, then you're not paying attention. It's roundly documented and called out by every human rights group in the world, sort of like the genocide that we're still ignoring, I guess. In this case, Rokana goes there. Now, whether it's a stunt or not,

Starting point is 01:03:38 it doesn't change the reality. He posts this on the 11th. Israeli settlers brandishing American-made M-4s, surprise, surprise, detained me and other Americans on my trip to Palestine. Now, frankly, I don't think, these people really care. I hope I'm wrong. But him saying Palestine, where were you this whole time when you were voting to fund Israel, right? Let's, let's, I mean, let's be sure we're looking at this

Starting point is 01:04:00 through the right lens. Regardless of that, when the IDF arrived, they cited with the settlers and continued our detention. I mean, think about that. Guys, we're talking. That's like the U.S. military. Like, okay, it's the equivalent of, let's say, you know, I don't know, pick some kind of militia in the United States that sees his Netanyahu or Smotrich holds him in a illegal detention and the U.S. military shows up and continues to keep them in detention. Just think about the equivalent of that and what will be saying in the world. It's just, it's, it's close, shows you that nothing is sacred to these people. I'm talking about the military and the Zionist government of the, of Israel and what they're

Starting point is 01:04:36 obviously willing to do. And my point would be that, and we'll get to it in a second on top, but that even with the screaming and how angry they were, I bet you nothing will happen to these people. And he says they made a huge mistake. He files up saying, looks like there's body camera from a different car when this happened. Unprecedented, a legal detention of Americans by a foreign country. Unprecedented. You mean aside from Joe Meeters, the U.S.'s liberty veteran or any number of Americans that have been detained through the Fultillas, or you mean the Americans that were killed in Gaza or the American?

Starting point is 01:05:06 I mean, come on. Unprecedented because a politician, let's not make yourself too important, Rocana. I mean, this to me is much, and this is what you're going to get from the criticism from the other side that wants to defend Israel is that it's all about him. Well, that's kind of true in some ways, but it doesn't change the point that what he did is showing you what Israel actually is, even when it comes to U.S. support. Or at the very least that if he's on the Democrat side right now, that feigns not support, even though they do, they, you know, who knows how you want to frame this. But the point was, I think I have this video. Yeah, I do. I'll play it for you.

Starting point is 01:05:39 There's some cussing. So mind you, there is some cussing for the children out there, earmuffs. They'll play this clip where you see these people who have now been identified, popping tires and breaking the window. of these cars that are a delegation with CNN and a U.S. politician. There's no, there's impunity, guys. They know they can do what they want. And so anyone else to say when you, when, when are the arrests of these settlers and IDF officers, Netanyahu?

Starting point is 01:06:07 Oh, he's got a Nike. He's going to be high. Oh, my God. Go, go, go, go. Fuck. Oh, shit. No, no, no, no, no. No, no.

Starting point is 01:06:18 No, no. Right. Move, move, move, bitch. Move. Move, go. Get the fuck out of the way. Move. Move.

Starting point is 01:06:26 Go, go, go. Watch out, watch out. There it is. Now, there's more videos, but most of which are, you know, that just shows you what they were dealing with and what happened. And ultimately he was that they were held

Starting point is 01:06:44 by these random children that are backed up by the Israeli government because they're extremists. And then the IDF backed them up and held this sitting American politician. And I think they write the time here in a second. in the next clip here, or the post. Where was it?

Starting point is 01:07:00 I was reading through it earlier, but for a while. The point for me is simply the idea that they held him in general and that they had, that the IDF held them on top of that. Now, Ryan Graham says, this is the guy. Well, Andre X, who, by the way we've shown you before, is somebody in there constantly dealing with these people, and he almost died. He got beat up very seriously by these people.

Starting point is 01:07:19 Nothing ever happened. Andre X is worth following. And he's very political, has very clearly, of political opinions that you may not agree with, but he's documenting what these people are doing to innocent people every day. Ryan says, I'm sure that authorities have his name, given how angry the Israeli government says it was with CNN, with both that CNN and Rokana were attacked separately, he'll be arresting any minute, right? We know it's not going to happen. This happens every day. Now they know who he is. They know where he's from. I doubt anything happens.

Starting point is 01:07:50 Emily Schrader, you know, the one that was advocating, you know, some gaslighting about the genocide all the time. what was happening and still is. U.S. Representative Kana, she says, is a charlatan and dishonest. Yeah, probably. He is government, just like you guys are. His tour doesn't change what happened, though. His tour halted on the bus because they entered a closed military zone, which is prohibited. To civilians.

Starting point is 01:08:10 Oh, wait, you mean other than the settlers who are civilians? Or are you suggesting the settlers are exactly what we know they are, and they're actually military or backed up by the government? Oops. Police were called in to discuss the problem. Oh, then why were the settlers beating them up? She's just lying. like this is a shameless deceiver with our tour organizer who had repeatedly attempted to enter

Starting point is 01:08:29 the zone. Okay. Either way, if they went into a wrong zone, it doesn't explain why they were treated that way. Wouldn't the IDF go, hey, you need to leave here? They wouldn't get detained by a bunch of children with knives and guns who are beating up their car. Well, they do have guns, but in this case, a stick and a knife that were used. And then the IDF shows up a detain. That's not how that works, unless you're admitting that the settlers are a part of the government.

Starting point is 01:08:50 We all know that, though, guys. This is just what this shows you. you. The bus had to wait until the arrival of the officers to the scene, which is what caused the delay. Guys, she's just lying. Lying. And Ryan Grimson is, according to Schrader, the paramilitary goons that held up Rokane's vehicle at gunpoint were actually doing it the order of the military. See, you can't hide from that. And she trapped herself with this.

Starting point is 01:09:11 This is what they do. And they'll just ignore it, pretend like she didn't say it. It's clear that these plainclosed gangs operate in coordination with the IDF, but they're rare to see it admitted this openly. It's exactly what I took from it. And I think she absolutely trapped herself, but they'll ignore it. Now, Janice Girl highlights what some of the other politicians said. Congressman Greg Murphy said, sounds like another plea for publicity. I think I'm not saying that.

Starting point is 01:09:33 When you're going to the scene of a genocide and you get detained by illegal settlers, or the whole world calls illegal and the military of Israel, Israel backs that up. But yes, publicity. I mean, probably. I do think part of this was about, you know, all of them do this. But it doesn't change the importance of the story. and says anything to get in front of the camera. Why else would you be there?

Starting point is 01:09:54 It's not your country. I mean, think about this. They're shameless, as Janek girl points out. Greg Murphy says he should not be in that country. In 2022, Murphy also went to Israel, except his trip was paid for by A-PAC. $29,000, where he kissed the wall and pledged allegiance to Israel. So wait, is it only that you don't want to go to the area where bad things are happening? When you say it's not his country, then why would you go?

Starting point is 01:10:17 Why were you in Israel? What's the point you're making here? Just not that part of occupied Palestine. Got it. What a coward, guys, and this is for the people that run this country, or at least ostensibly. Saul Rod points out ridiculous headline from New York Times about a U.S. congressman getting detained by armed Israeli militants. The subhead sounds like they're criticizing him for being there instead of the illegal occupiers. I mean, that's the point with the last one as well.

Starting point is 01:10:42 I mean, you can't ignore this. These people are illegal by every single stretch of the imagination. Even Pompeo had to say they weren't inconsiderate. consistent with international law, didn't say it was legal. And then they went right back to saying it's legal. It's illegal. Even Trump's recently stated that he didn't want that, even though he allowed them to do it when he got elected. That's the Mary Maddleton pay off on top of a lot of other things. She explicitly stated, I want West Bank annexation. It's all on the record. They just think you're this stupid. So when this person comes out and says that, I mean, it's just, it's not,

Starting point is 01:11:12 there's no way to misunderstand this, guys. There's no way to misunderstand this. He's mad that those illegal occupiers did something, or rather that she was there to point to it, not even that they were breaking the law. Just cowards, all of them. Now, Tucker Carlson commented on what Mike Huckabee said. Actually, there was one thing I just saw that there's a point about Huckabee I just saw pop up of my thorn. But it was about this one of these conversations. I think it was about the other one. But anyway, the point is Huckabee is just a shameless supporter of Israel no matter what happens. It was a pleasure to be with whatever her name is on Fox News today. Iranians hold kill Trump flags, a comedianist, yes, random Iranians.

Starting point is 01:11:56 who have right to hold whatever they want. And of course, because you probably killed their families. I know, shocking, right? Tucker Carlson, an American member of Congress, Rokana, is threatened by foreign terrorists carrying American rifles, backed by a foreign military paid for by American taxpayers, and the U.S. ambassador to that country, Israel, says not a word in defense of his own countrymen.

Starting point is 01:12:17 You see, even if you go Democrat, you're still talking about Americans, guys. But you see, that's the problem, isn't it? From Trump's perspective and all of them, they're not American, are they? they're evil Democrats who hate our country, and it's just not even close to the reality of what they are actually doing. Now, I don't think any of the government cares at all. But what's funny to me is that you have people on the Democrat side

Starting point is 01:12:35 who absolutely believe what they think they want to do will better this country. If you can't acknowledge that, then you're a child in this conversation. There's also people that dishonestly do what they want for their own benefit at the expense of the country, which is most of who are pointing to. But there are those two. People who believe communism might say this country, I disagree. But it's just lazy thinking. thing on the right. Tons of people believe that what they were doing with this was all going to be

Starting point is 01:12:58 in the bed. But now they see that they were lied to. But it goes on. Not a word of the fence in his own countrymen. And instead uses his social media accounts to promote his own vapid cable news appearances, which amount to propaganda for that same foreign country. You know, he is the ambassador, but that's supposed to be the ambassador for American interests, not the Israel interest towards America. You see the difference? Goes on to say, it's too much, too insulting and humiliating to America. This is how revolutions start. For sake of our nation, Huckabee should be removed from his post immediately.

Starting point is 01:13:29 I doubt he will. Also, Saudi Agarist points out, thank you for the man who laughs for sharing this with me. How much money each state gives to Israel? The states, not even the government, not the federal government, the individual states and their own discussions of their own money that comes from your pocket

Starting point is 01:13:45 that also goes to Israel that we probably don't even factor in to the bigger number. We're taking over. Now, talking about just what Israel is, before we get to everything else, because I do think it's important. You already know this. Anybody watches this show,

Starting point is 01:14:00 anybody who's even barely paying attention, but just some other updates. Case it wasn't already clear. This parody Jeff account said, hey, Grock, did Israel execute 15 medics and rescue workers in Gaza, then bury them in mass graves with their ambulances? Case you don't know, yes,

Starting point is 01:14:18 and it's an easily verifiable story. But the crazy thing is that it's very publicly known, and yet it's a fake news story when it comes to the U.S. media, when it comes to left and right of our false government. think about how crazy that is. How are you supporting that? Yes, Grock says.

Starting point is 01:14:33 This reference to the March 23rd, 2025 Rafa incident, IDF forces attacked a convoy of clearly marked ambulances, a fire truck, and a U.N. vehicle, killing 15 Palestinian medics, rescue workers, eight Red Crescent, civil defense, even a member of the United Nations. Their bodies and vehicles were buried in a mass grave and recovered days later.

Starting point is 01:14:55 If you don't, if this one point does not wait, you up to, and it's not because GROC said. We shouldn't be trusting GROC. The evidence is already there. We've already covered it. This is just so publicly available evidence that GROC has to acknowledge it. So here we are where we can know that they killed UN members, civil workers, Red Crescent, random Palestinians, people who fire truck.

Starting point is 01:15:15 I mean, come on. And then buried them and covered it up. And we can publicly acknowledge that. The UN can know that. This shows you what these people are. There's no explaining this. Guys, the reality is they're monster. and they will do whatever they want and frame themselves as the good guy.

Starting point is 01:15:31 So will most governments, when it's in their interest. Video from a victim's phone shows emergency lights on during heavy fire. Israeli initially claimed suspicious movement without lights and Hamas links, then admitted mistakes after evidence emerged. You know, like every time. It was admitting it once you're caught is not the same thing as being honest. It's internal probe found professional failures and disciplined commanders. Yeah, who look it up.

Starting point is 01:15:56 Nothing happened. You wag your finger in their face and go move along, go do it again. UN, New York Times, other reports confirm the killings and burial. Israel cites combat context, denies close range executions. Everyone. Biden, Trump, left, right, they do not care. I mean, I'd like to believe Rocana Massey might actually care, but their track record shows you at the end of the day. They usually don't.

Starting point is 01:16:22 Come on. I mean, guys, it's just we have to be real about where this shows you and where we are with our government, the merging of our militaries, the ongoing genocide, the ongoing technocratic takeover Israel is a part of. Here is an example still right now in Gaza of random people, just breaking people stuff, pretending to be Palestinians using their cane, crashing their cups and, you know, this is what, this is what they're doing? So wait a minute, is this because there's a Hamas tunnel? Or are they just having fun ruining the lives of people that they've killed? You don't need to misunderstanders. There's no capable way of misunderstanding this.

Starting point is 01:16:57 They're pretending to be, you know, anyway, they're monsters. These are monsters who are relishing in the joy of the destruction of another person's life. Now, whether you think they were like this because they were brought up like this by their government or not, it's who they are. You have to call that out. On top of that, while this is going on, they're still, this is from 2025. We talked about it then. But the point is they're using weird tech and weird chemical things. on the people of Palestine. They always have been doing this. Battle tested, they call it when they go sell it in the

Starting point is 01:17:29 world stage. The way we stopped hearing or seeing media about Palestine, and there are new types of bombs being dropped in a ceasefire. Drop site news. Israeli finance minister Smotrich says it trumps Middle East envoy Whitkoff privately told him. So this is publicly admitted by him. He could be lying, of course, but I doubt it, publicly admitted through their own media. So Smotridge says that Whitkoff, the one negotiating on behalf of the United States and involved with the Gaza revitalization or whatever you want to pretend it is, it's just ongoing genocide with a new technocratic flair, privately told him, Whitkoff, told Smotrich, I will not let two million Nazis live next to your children along the border fence. So aside from the insane point of

Starting point is 01:18:17 calling people Nazis as they're being annihilated by objective Nazis, people that are literally connected back to the original Nazi party. I'm talking about the origin of Zionism that, quite frankly, tried to align itself and did with the Nazi party on the record. What was that under? I was going to look up that, oh, it's this one here. Perfect.

Starting point is 01:18:43 Just as I point you up, the only thing I think this is a good one to share is because Heretz and their own article make this clear. Zionist militia's effort to recruit Nazis in the fight against British are revealed. This is the reality. The Lehigh, one of the origin elements of the Zionist party, continued to seek to ally with Nazi Germany even after the final solution began.

Starting point is 01:19:00 It's documented by the Israeli leading newspaper, meaning that the whole thing they point to to justify why it had to exist, they were involved with that group while it was happening. I don't know how we don't know this stuff today. The point is for them to call those people Nazis while they're committing the same genocide.

Starting point is 01:19:16 Never again, it's about everybody, isn't it? Which honest Jews today will tell you, which we played many times. In fact, I can play one, I think, if I've got it real quick. Where was that? Let's see. Just the opening part of it, in case you don't remember. Holocaust survivor, my message to the brave student protesters in America is just keep doing it, don't give up. We are doing exactly the same. And in the long term, we are going to prevail.

Starting point is 01:19:52 I'm out from the beginning at every March. This Holocaust survivor says, stop the genocide in Gaza. This is what the Columbia protest, by the way, also put on by Jewish voices for peace, but continue to tell us why it's all anti-Semitic. Now, back to the point. Something real funky is going on with my back. I hope this doesn't just glitch out on me right now. A lot of lots to talk about. So other than the absurd thing of calling the Nazis,

Starting point is 01:20:21 which is clearly a aligned agenda from these Zionist supporters, to say that you're not going to let him live by the border. So what is he telling you? We're not going to let Palestinians be anywhere near to their, to Palestine, not to the occupied Gaza, not to what you call Israel proper, not even to the new location next to what you're claiming. You are openly saying,

Starting point is 01:20:40 we're not going to let them exist near this or at all. Because that's what they want, guys. And this is the representatives of the U.S. government. These are monsters. Truly, right now, this is the pinnacle. This is the fight of our lives. These people and what's happening with all of this, the technocratic angle of it, the genocide,

Starting point is 01:20:59 what Israel's greater agenda, the greater New North America project, all that's happening is part of something really dark. And I think we all sense it right now. Smotcher said the conversation took place, back in January 2025. Let that sink in. When Whitkoff met him alongside the Strategic Affairs Minister, Ron Dermer in Jerusalem,

Starting point is 01:21:17 a day after the envoy toured Gaza's Cours, the Netsarum corridor and viewed footage from October 7. The propaganda fake snuff film that's been called out a thousand different ways and proven to be false. Let him visibly shaken. So you could argue some of these moronic politicians who can't tie their shoes without AIDS, don't even know that they're being manipulated. Recounting the exchange, Smotrich added, there is only one thing that hurts the enemy.

Starting point is 01:21:40 land. Right. So they're stealing land because we all know this. It shows you what we're dealing with, guys. These people are disgusting. Here's Dan's tweet, by the way, you can check this out and the point going back to showing you how the Zionist terror group that twice attempted to ally with Nazi Germany and sought and found a copycat fascist state. That's the Zionist organization on the record. Included here, if you want to read it from the Israeli media. Now, Aaron also points out, and you might have seen this already during the World World Cup. There was actually two examples of this that I could see. The Egyptian Relief Committee in Gaza had been organizing public screenings of the World Cup matches for displaced families in the strip.

Starting point is 01:22:22 About an hour before today's, this is July 7th, Egypt-Argentina match, Israel killed the committee's public relations director and a strike in his vehicle. Two others, including a child, were killed. You know, why? Because they don't want people to, they don't want Palestinians enjoying themselves. I mean, how else do you explain this? they directly targeted him because he was allowing them something that would give them a reprieve from their destruction, from their genocide.

Starting point is 01:22:50 And they murdered him anyway, or murdered him because of that. And Aaron Mante simply frames it as ahead of today's game, Egypt coach, Hossam Hassan, appealed to the world. Let Palestinian people live. Israel responds by killing the head of public relations for the Egyptian Relief Committee in Gaza. I mean, it's almost as if they want you to know how monster is that. they are because they know that it i guess they can control the narrative then dan lambert the wikipedia entry for rafa right now you can look it up a city bigger than limerick or at least last time i

Starting point is 01:23:24 checked this was on the seventh is now in the past tense it's gone not a single building is left intact entire city erased by israel they are the nazis of today you could look at the picture you could check it for yourself you can realize that the whole world is acknowledged that this place doesn't exist anymore and they're still just pretending that it's there until they can move forward until they can create their new Gaza technocratic home base and just push them into the sea or whatever they actually said they were going to do. We're talking about an entire civilization, one of the oldest in existence. The foundation, like the whole, the birthplace of Jesus Christ, where's all the Christian right, guys? Who cares, right? Because, you know, pro-Israel or whatever.

Starting point is 01:24:03 Monstrous, what we're dealing with. Insane. Hearing on the West Bank, endless stories, this happens to be a U.S. citizen. Back to Roe-Cod. point, I guess it's unprecedented unless it happens all the time, right? It's been over five weeks since the Israeli military kidnapped a 20-year-old, a U.S. citizen named Samasafi from her family's home in the West Bank. She's being held without charge in Israeli attention where a family cannot access her or contact her. Now, I'm not going to assume, I don't know what's happening, but with what we know goes on in

Starting point is 01:24:33 these attention centers, with all the examples of rape and torture, wouldn't they know that they do it just to punish them? God only knows what's happening. A U.S. citizen, have you heard that? U.S. government speak up? Has Rokana mentioned her name? No. Voices of rabbis points out, voice of rabbis points out even what they're doing to Jews who are not Zionists. Zionists set fire to the house of prominent Jewish anti-Zionist activist, a Jewish neighborhood of Jerusalem while his family was inside the house. So keep telling us it's about Judaism, right?

Starting point is 01:25:09 The point is you have Jewish people who are in Jerusalem who don't believe in Zionism. And what happens? Well, other Zionist Jews burn their housebound with their family inside. Because that's very, very Israeli of you. To do that to people, as we talked about in the past, to West Bank settlers burning families down and killing, you know, the whole Ollie's on the grill point of story. The only crime of this family was that they were religious and opposed Zionism and Israel. You just can't misunderstand that, guys. Here's another Kirakow post.

Starting point is 01:25:38 Israel is the only country that's recently bombed both churches and synagogues, but yet they keep calling Muslims terrorists, which is just as possible, right? It's not about Muslim or Jew or Christian. Anybody can be an extremist, and you should call out any of them. Whether you think one of the prevalence or not, for you to simply say this culture or that is bad is simply you falling for that trap.

Starting point is 01:26:00 Anybody can be good or bad, whether they choose to be led by the extremist versions of whatever religion that exists and all of them is up to them. And then you can judge them accordingly to then say that because you're in this religion or because you have the skin color, because you look this way, you are part of that problem. If you do that, you're being played. Or maybe you're just gross. Maybe you're just a bad person as well because you're choosing to allow subjective points to guide

Starting point is 01:26:25 what you think about a person before even know who they are. We're all taught about this when we were five, didn't we? Here's what he has to say. About the bombing of St. Portfidio's Church in Gaza. October 18th. I'm still angry about that. the oldest continuously operating church in the world. And 24 women and children took refuge there

Starting point is 01:26:45 and the Israelis blew it up. You know what else they blew up? Common knowledge. We sent a film crew into Tehran to document the oldest Jewish extenance Jewish community in the world. The oldest continuous youth synagogue in the world. Synagogue. The United States and Israel flat in that synagogue 11 days after we shot our documentary

Starting point is 01:27:00 about two months ago. How do you explain that? Because it's not it's not about Jewish or Christian or anything. It's about anybody standing in a way of their agenda, right? And so they attack them because that synagogue does not believe in their Zionist agenda. That's why. That is what it comes down to. And the same reason they're bombing churches in every single location to flattening them, as he points out, because they don't care about any of that.

Starting point is 01:27:23 Neither do our fake Christian leadership either, guys. It's undeniable if you pay attention. One, wiped from the face of the earth. Today, today, today, a Palestinian child was shot in the West Bank, a baby. an infant. Yesterday, Taiba was set on fire, the only 100% Christian village in the West Bank. And in the past week, four Palestinian students, female students were kidnapped by the IDF, one a Christian, one an American citizen, one of the national football team, and the world is silent.

Starting point is 01:27:52 How about Shereen Aba Aboakla? Shereen Abakla, the most important, most highly respected journalist at Al Jazeera, an American citizen, a Greek Orthodox Christian, she's in the West Bank. with a bulletproof vest that says press and a Kevlar helmet that says press she's standing with a cameraman behind a tree because she doesn't want to get in the way of anybody and as soon as she steps out from behind the tree

Starting point is 01:28:19 and Israeli sniper shoots her in the face and kills her instantly. Now, you know this story. We've talked about this. Robert wrote about this as it was happening. As usual, in the midst of the story, not way after it when it can be manipulated. And that's when the story's breaking

Starting point is 01:28:34 for some of the new media Israel covered up the murder of Shereen Abu O'Klaid with U.S. help. Robert in Lakesh, September 10th, 2022. Now, here's the, you know, the casual image that is impossible to misunderstand where you have people in a funeral procession walking, not armed, as the IDF just beat them up as they walk by. Hit their legs, hit their arms, they're trying to get them, drop the coffin. And as far as I can tell, they never did, despite being beat with billy clubs or whatever

Starting point is 01:29:03 you call them, as they walk by. I mean, how do you misunderstand that? That's just vicious, guys. It's hatred, which I guarantee goes both ways at this point, but let's understand what's really driving this. I'm bad enough. The IDF goes into the hospital where her body is being carried out in a coffin.

Starting point is 01:29:24 They beat the pallbearers to the point where they drop the coffin, and then they shoot rubber bullets. That's too bad. I didn't, I'd excited to hear that when I was listening to earlier. I didn't think that happened. I thought, like, because I think I've said in the past, too, I thought that they just ultimately toughed it out, which is sort of a point of pride.

Starting point is 01:29:41 But I mean, who's going to stop fault them for being beaten the legs and dropping some, you know, but just think about how disgusting that is. You know, the willingness to do that. How do you rationalize that? Well, you don't, guys. You just lie about it. That's what these people do. And smoke grenades into the Greek Orthodox Church while her funeral service is taking place.

Starting point is 01:29:59 And not a single word from the American government. Not a word. Or from evangelical Christian leaders or Catholic leaders. Yeah. I want to know where is Ted Cruz and Lindsay Graham and Mike Huckabee when these things happen. Nowhere. No, and people will say, you know, in December when Gaza made it to the front pages for about an hour and a half, all of a sudden, on cue, all the evangelical Christian human rights groups, all Catholic leaders, even Catholic Bishop Robert Barron. What about Nigeria?

Starting point is 01:30:27 What about Nigeria? To this day, Bishop Barron has never mentioned Gaza, the West Banker, Lebanon. And I hate that deflection. It's, you know, look, it's, it's fair to point out that other things are happening, but to use it as a way to ignore something else, there's no obligation for everybody to care about everything happening everywhere. Like, it's an actually insane thing to argue. But secondarily, what you will find if you actually care about what their opinions are,

Starting point is 01:30:50 that if you just ask them, they do care. And they have talked about it. You're just making this broad assumption because your assumption is the only care about it because they hate this other side or because they're political, blah, blah, blah. Yeah, that exists too. I just it's just always that simple guys and it's the nuance is what these people will completely break because they don't want you thinking like that they don't want you giving people the benefit of the dollar they don't want you considering that people may have different meanings or different driving forces than just that they

Starting point is 01:31:17 hate Israel or they're anti-Semitic or whatever it is in the current topic that's the same whether it's about Israel not the same thing our government does with everything all or nothing right Trump does it every day in like bumbling stupid stupid ways that that's no different than past administration other than it does it very obviously. They always have this sort of counterbalance. You're either with us or you're against us. It's how they operate. And it's never that simple.

Starting point is 01:31:40 What about Nigeria? That lasted for about a week. Yeah. So they'll say, well, what about, what about Boko Haram? My organization guards, churches in Nigeria, and the only synagogue. We provide security for this.

Starting point is 01:31:52 So I understand we lost an employee last year to Islamist extremism in Nigeria. I'm not naive to this, but we lost two employees in Gaza that were killed when our baby formula warehouse was bombed. I'm still angry. I swear that it does that. But yeah, so his point clearly is that even though they did, they said that, he's like,

Starting point is 01:32:08 well, we do care. We were just there. You know, it's just that people try to frame it that way for those online who might take that argument as, well, that must be the truth that without caring that the guy does actually care. Now, one quick note overlaps with this. This just frustrates me. Rob Schneider.

Starting point is 01:32:25 Now, you know, maybe I misunderstand who I think this person is. Like, I watched him say things during COVID. And I thought he seemed like a pretty small. smart guy, or at least a very, somebody who cared enough to try to find the information. Now, maybe, no, who knows about what, I just don't think that it's, it felt like it was somebody who thought that it was rational thought was more important than political sides. Because think about it, he was somebody that was arguably on one side during the COVID time frame, you know, and then kind of came out, which was seen as a Republican, you know, I just think it came

Starting point is 01:32:55 out with the truth. That was COVID shots were killing people. And he fought for that. Now, this Quantum Guard account, which is one of these, like, religiously manipulative accounts. No pun or connection intended. Just like just obsessively. I'll just cut to this point right away.

Starting point is 01:33:09 This video is from 2025. Here's the post, October 9th, 2025. Right? That's an old post. That's not even getting into whether you think it's important or not. So first of all, the post says, Update.

Starting point is 01:33:21 He's pushing to ban Sharia law. Why? Because this account makes a living on using old content to make you think something new. They all do it. Breaking. Obama's going down.

Starting point is 01:33:29 And Rob has done the same thing, probably without knowing it. and shared that that he ate from Jesse Waters from 2025. And guess what? He's not because they're never going after these people, guys. I frankly don't even think John Bolton will have anything happen to him, despite what they were ruling, let alone Comey or any of the rest they claim,

Starting point is 01:33:44 which have nothing going on about them. I mean, it's just crazy. So my point is that he posts this and then shares it as if it's happening, which is just the cycle of nonsense, and I think it's about hiding what's actually going on. But on top of that, guys, do you realize what a dumbster argument this all is? Right now, if you care to look,

Starting point is 01:34:00 Not a single piece of legislation anywhere in this country is pushing some kind of adoption of Sharia law. Secondarily, it would be wildly unconstitutional, but bad argument today, seeing as our government doesn't care about that. But just think about how silly this is. Pushing to ban Sharia law nationwide. Good, do it. Nobody cares. That's not happening. Not even in places like Michigan, not Dearborn.

Starting point is 01:34:20 You're not seeing some genuine effort to make some kind of, this is a narrative pushed by Israel, pushed by that kind of mindset to make us think Muslims are taking over our country. There is an undeniable vein of that mindset. Now, to an objective standpoint, should we care? Yes. Does it matter whether that's happening? Of course it does. And if I see that and there's evidence to it, then we should care whether it's Muslim or Jewish or Christian or, you know, Iran, Israel, or whatever else.

Starting point is 01:34:45 It all matters. Evidence matters a little bit more, though, doesn't it? And the point would be you can prove Israel's doing that right now for crying out loud. Look at the legislation. Do you see, in this case, what we're pointing to is Muslim people that exist in this country that then mean there's an underlying. Could it be? Yes. Is there evidence of that? Not that I can see. And the reality being that places like Michigan and Dearborn, people walking down the streets like an entire large protest or whatever you want to call it with their own flags.

Starting point is 01:35:11 Shehada flags, not ISIS flags, or whatever else. And there's nothing wrong with that. It's the same as Israeli protests with Israeli flags or any other idea. But because they're evil Muslim, this is what Laura Lumer would push. From back of the point, ban Sharia law is an effort to deflect and distract. If I saw it happening, I would absolutely stand against it. Do I want Sharia law? No, I don't want any government at all, let alone some kind of Sharia law that's different.

Starting point is 01:35:38 It's just silly. So my point is ban jaria law in every state. Rob points out to on July 12th. Now, why? And I said, Jesus, Rob, I didn't think you were this stupid or this goal. Stop allowing yourself to be used by the party just because some of them said the right things during the COVID-19 agenda.

Starting point is 01:35:53 And they didn't believe them then either. Most of them got the shot anyway. And of course, also recognized the videos of 2025. Stop letting these Gryfters use you. I think there's a reason that this is coming out. The reason is that they are deflecting from the other parts of the conversation. Right now, if you really pay attention, it's hard to see anybody has the problem other than the United States and what Israel's doing with them. And who's leading? You can decide for yourself. I mean the sense of like the larger geopolitical conversation, let alone something that's not even

Starting point is 01:36:21 actually happening yet, if it ever will. On that note, talking about what Israel is absolutely a part of that our government's covering up that Rob, I think, cares about, but instead we're worried about some phantom that's not actually happening, yet, if at all. New Mexico says U.S. Justice Department hindering probe of former Epstein Ranch. Now, we've made a point about this, I mean, well before the Epstein Files, because it was a point, and Sorrel Ranch has been something that's within this community is very well known, but after the Epstein file lie, and Posobic and lives of TikTok carrying these binders and going, oh, we did it, and then lying to you and not doing what They said they would now shouting you down for caring about it because they're absolute frauds.

Starting point is 01:37:00 The point here is that this was the major, there were probably four or five different examples that I thought were, you know, had some kind of traction. Not the, this guy said it in an email, therefore we're going to point to it in the files that says Trump's a bad guy. They are bad guys. But there's a lot of subjective evidence in there, not to be ignored. This and a few others were undeniable, meaning that you could prove they didn't investigate, prove that there was definitely evidence, or more so prove that there was

Starting point is 01:37:26 you know, compromising overlaps of people currently in the government. In this case, in New Mexico, as we've already covered, a politician in New Mexico in 2019 sent this to them saying, I got this information, and I've shown you the actual document right from the Epstein files. There were actual video files. They claimed there are bodies that were buried, that women were murdered, and they buried them in the show, all of it. Now, look, it may be false, but guess what they've never done.

Starting point is 01:37:51 They've never actually followed up on this, even though Cash Patel, Todd Blanche, Bonino and everyone else, Biden included, all lied to you, all covered it up. Now, as this current administration continues to lie to you, they're also pushing back very publicly on this one investigation. New Mexico's top law enforcement official on Thursday actually accused the U.S. Department of Justice of hindering the state's investigation into Jeffrey Epstein by withholding unredacted files on the late sex offender. I mean, realize they're supposed to be releasing the rest of this and they're just simply not. They recently came out and said, we're done.

Starting point is 01:38:27 That's not happening. Move on. That's why nobody trusts them, not even their own supporters. President Donald Trump has suggested the country move on from investigating Epstein. You know, you're still talking about Epstein. That'll follow him to the grave. To acting U.S. Attorney Todd Blanche, Torres said the Justice Department had failed to respond to the state request in February, February for unredacted files containing names of Epstein survivors.

Starting point is 01:38:52 Why would they in any way not really give? that. We're talking about the government, guys. The U.S. government is asking the federal government for information that's supposed to be legally required to be released, to you included, by the way. They want survivors, witnesses, co-conspirators, and other individuals essential to the New Mexico probe. So the only thing this suggests is that they definitely do not want people digging into this story, no pun intended. In a statement on Thursday, Torah said the delay, which has now lasted 130 days, was unreasonable under any rule of reason. I mean, this is where the bodies are buried.

Starting point is 01:39:30 Again, not a joke. Like, not a pot. That's reality. As they understand, is that they've killed people and buried them here. And that's been verified or rather suggestively verified by the evidence we've yet to see. And that's why she's been calling it out the previous administration, now this current person in the same government in New Mexico. Quote, the DOJ.

Starting point is 01:39:49 The DOJ reiterates that it welcomes New Mexico undertaking addition. investigations of the Zoro Ranch and stands ready to provide necessary assistance with New Mexico. That's what they said. This is where we are right now. This government has made the decision that no matter what happened, just lie. I guess it's been called sort of the Roy Cohen, lie, lie, sue, the whole thing. It's what it seems to come from.

Starting point is 01:40:11 Whitney's covered for a very long time. The whole mafioso kind of dynamic. And the whole Jewish connection as well. That's very clear, guys. The point in the mafia, that's a historical fact. You can look up. In this case, They're failing to give the information.

Starting point is 01:40:25 They're willfully denying it. In fact, stating they're not going to give it to them, then when they have to publicly talk about it, they go, yeah, we'll give whatever they want. We'll help them it's own their fault. Then fail to do it. And I mean, even I'm willing to bet that if you got pushed, they'd say, no, we will give them what they have to ask.

Starting point is 01:40:41 And they just know that they can just lie because the system is designed to help them. I don't know how we don't know. I mean, again, that statement is not even need anymore. Everyone sees this. and the people that don't, I mean, look, at the end of the day, the reason I think is being lied about is because this is the line right now between everyone aware our government is either broken, corrupt, compromise, occupied,

Starting point is 01:41:03 and whether we choose to do anything about that, whatever that may be to you. And they have decided that, look, they see, but they're not doing anything. So let's just lie and move forward. And if they never do anything, then it won't really matter anyway until we get into their technocratic prison, right? and that's where I think it's going. Now, where this overlaps with is international kind of justice and whether the Trump administration is also just wildly corrupt.

Starting point is 01:41:28 The answer is yes. So Israel's been pushing back on the ICC for a very long time because they want to investigate their crimes well before the genocide. The current genocide, anyway. And so what's important to understand is that this is about international kind of, you know, accountability. Now, what's important about this is that I don't support the UN or any of these things when it comes

Starting point is 01:41:49 to American lives and freedom. That's an important distinction to make here, because what we're talking about here, even though the government are technically Americans, and they are, but it's a different quasi sort of situation where especially with the Israel overlap, but that you're supposed to represent the Americans as the kind of in de facto current government.

Starting point is 01:42:06 So what ICC, ICJ, what these things were developed for, ask yourself this. In a situation where, you know, kind of like where we are right now, We're not just one person, but the entirety of the government is compromised or chooses to go of a riot, you know, do the opposite of what it's supposed to do. Right. I mean, the entirety of the legal system, everything, to where Americans are going, hey, man, you don't even do, we don't even care what we think anymore. And they just keep going. Or, and let's even say, look, they make it about the international community.

Starting point is 01:42:37 They're murdering people overseas. And our system has no way, this is the whole point about the independent judiciary, judiciary, which is what Israel is. was being proven to not have. I made that point years ago. And Lindsey Graham, Breast in Hell, said, back at that point,

Starting point is 01:42:53 ultimately said, that's why we don't get to investigate him because they have an independent judiciary. Same point here is that the system in this country is not self-enforcing. Nobody's holding anybody accountable. Congress isn't impeaching anybody for breaking roads. It's a cycle of corruption.

Starting point is 01:43:09 So this is why this kind of thing was created, whether dishonest or not, the arguable, ostensible meaning behind it, was that who holds the government accountable when they disregard everything that's supposed to hold them in check. That's where this is supposed to step in, where an international entity can step in and go, hey, you're murdering all those people over there and you're not, your own system is not doing anything about that. And so they step in. Now, is it being abused?

Starting point is 01:43:32 Yes, is it corrupt? Absolutely. But there are still elements of this that have been applied to stop, like what least was feigned to be done about Israel. So where we are now, it has been since Afghanistan, Syria, it's come up many times. and very much with Israel, where Pompeo, Bolton, numerous times openly threatened the families of the people at the ICC because they threatened to investigate the crimes of Israel or U.S. military in Afghanistan. And so they yelled, threatened to murder them because that shows you're innocent, doesn't it? Per U.S. official on the ICC, this is today.

Starting point is 01:44:06 The State Department is leading a whole of government campaign to systematically dismantle the threat posed to the U.S. sovereignty by the International Criminal Court. What they mean is the sovereignty of their government control, whatever that means. Not the sovereignty of Americans. As far as the ICC doesn't seem to have any interest in undermining the American people's sovereignty as a country. I could be wrong on that,

Starting point is 01:44:26 and it wouldn't surprise me if this entity was bastardized for some of the reason. But on the surface, it appears they're trying to call them out for crimes they've committed. What's interesting to me is like if you want to take these criminals and take them to the Hague and prosecute them, I'm all for that. If you want to take some American for breaking the law for some rate, And that's a different story. I hope you understand the difference there. And this is not in necessarily support.

Starting point is 01:44:49 Like, again, my larger opinion is that if we didn't have any of these structures at all, so no government, none of this would be necessary. You may disagree, but that's an important distinction. Because the reason things like this are even necessary is because government exists. Because eventually government will become what we see today. And there needs to be something out there to check it because we can't do that. I hope we can get to a point to where none of it's necessary at all. Maybe lofty, but I believe it's possible.

Starting point is 01:45:12 if we could actually let it happen. A wide range of options are currently under consideration by the State Department and interagency partners, including travel bans, visa revocations, increased sanctions on the ICC. Same old stuff they've always done. But the reason I bring it up, Robert Marco Rubio put this clip out. The International Criminal Court, he writes, seeks to become the unaccountable arbiter of the new global law. Now, this has to see, I know you see what I'm talking about here. the ICC is not new.

Starting point is 01:45:42 It's been around doing the same thing, largely kind of defuncted a lot of ways for a long time. The reason he finds it threatening or they do is because they are creating a new global law. They are the ones creating the new system, which by the way, it's weird that I got so much pushback and I still do for kind of generally talking about this kind of transition, whether it's a network state point, technocracy, but I'm suddenly seeing that it's like super mainstream. like I told you like more perfect union did a whole thing about the network state agenda but all of this right the idea of like the new global kind of like Trump creating a new global order is I've seen like major mainstream platforms make that argument and that doesn't mean that I believe

Starting point is 01:46:24 it because they said it and you just mean you should ignore it because they said it the facts very much back that up with the new WHO point the global order the bore of peace that's what these things are in fact so threatening to a degree that you have groups that are currently international order who are going, hey, that's problematic. And I don't care what they think. I care because our government's trying to, you know, look, I think right now what we're seeing is this bullying into position

Starting point is 01:46:46 for the worst of the worst taking control. And he says, empowered to prosecute and arrest our citizens. No, this is why I made this point. It's empowered to prosecute arrest, power structures, government, people like you who are breaking the law at a global level that's now that nobody can do anything about. That's what it's for. we will teach the ICC the full meaning of America resolve

Starting point is 01:47:09 because this is a coward who's afraid to being held accountable so he wants to stand there with the little Rubio and act tough and strong because he's got the backing of some people. These people are not as strong and they project these things because they're weak. That's my opinion. Now, on other corruption levels, because that's what I think ICC is also part of just larger corruption they're involved in, unusual whales put this out.

Starting point is 01:47:35 Trump personally, and this is insane, Trump personally earned more from crypto than every publicly traded U.S. crypto company, company, like trading platforms. Donald Trump, the president's hall came to, as they write, at least $1.4 billion in 2025. Coinbase, number two, $1.2 billion. The entirety of Coinbase made $1.2 billion. And Donald Trump made $1.4 billion. and Donald Trump made 1.4 off failed crypto ventures. All of them are like a fraction of what they started as.

Starting point is 01:48:08 They yanked all of your wealth and some of the people still support him. Democrats shorted it or whatever you hear from some people. It's insane. That is blatant corruption. And I called it out like a lot of us did right in the beginning. As Hassi Vaughan Mafi writes, Americans realizing the president of the U.S. is so corrupt that he's outperforming the entire crypto market with insider trading.

Starting point is 01:48:30 well it's not just the insider trading it's about the um what they call you know the the the coin endeavors they took that were designed to fail rug pulls they stole from you now on a couple of the points this is from ap judge says trump irs lawsuit was filed for improper purpose for first lawyer for possible discipline there's something we get into here just in a range of time i think i don't actually not like that much the point here is simple it's another example of them misusing their influence. And this is why we've seen so many examples of lawyers, like ABA, for example, others that chose not to do what they were pushing them to do,

Starting point is 01:49:08 knowing that they were lying, knowing that they were misusing the situation, and the judges ultimately turned it away. But they only wanted the appearance of pushback. Trump doesn't care if you lose your job or you get, you know, some kind of a mark on your record for, as a lawyer, doing what you know is not the right practice. They don't care. And that's why so many people flee from this because they know you're expendable

Starting point is 01:49:28 when you work for people like this. Donald Trump's lawsuit against the IRS over his leaked tax returns was filed for, as they write, the judge writes, an improper purpose. Not the first time this has happened. On Monday, in a scathing decision that referred one of his lawyers for potential disciplinary action and characterized the $10 billion complaint as an exercise in self-dealing. You know why? This says the judge, I believe, appointed by Obama, accused Trump and his lawyers

Starting point is 01:50:00 of having manipulated the court system when he sued a federal agency under his control. I mean, think about how insane that is. Trump is so constantly trying to frame himself as like the adversarial position. He is in the power as most as you can have in the situation.

Starting point is 01:50:18 And suing the IRS as you're the president is just dumb. It might just be distraction for all we know, but of course, this is what they're calling out. Like you're abusing your power. Laying the groundwork for a settlement that granted him immunity from his tax audits for like the next six year.

Starting point is 01:50:31 This is just blatant corruption, guys. Now, if you're deciding because Obama pointed that person that it's all political, it could be if you're choosing to state that without any more knowledge other than the name and where they appoint, then you are part of the problem. That's a very childish thing to do. Obviously, they're all politically motivated, I feel, to some degree or another. And ultimately, it could be because of that. But if you stand back, you can find 16 other rulings in very similar ways that were ruled on

Starting point is 01:50:56 by Republican judges. So it's a choice to ignore it. Some people do. Another example, this has to do with the kind of slush fund he was creating. A federal judge nullifies the purported settlement behind Trump's slush fund, $1.7 billion. When was that old thing about spending less? Oh yeah, we're way past that. Finding there was never a case or controversy and referring as attorneys for possible discipline.

Starting point is 01:51:20 Glenn Greenwald, New York Times, the Trump administration issued subpoenas to the New York Times, the journalist you're right there, if you want to call them that, who wrote about the new Air Force One, an escalation of pressure on the media. Now, of course, the whole argument was that he had to not use it because it was potentially compromised, surprise, surprise.

Starting point is 01:51:39 You take a gift from somebody that's totally personal. Maybe they put some spot. I mean, it almost doesn't, like, surprise, it was hypothetically that Cash Patel didn't do what he was supposed to and they didn't like make sure it was secure

Starting point is 01:51:51 or the secrets are, it kind of just brings true with what this ridiculous, clownish administration's been doing. Now, who's to say if it's true or not? This is what they seemed to push back on. But the reality is they did choose to go with the old one to fly home. Their argument was it was because the other one was potentially compromised.

Starting point is 01:52:07 The FBI had some comments about it. Honestly, at this point, not concerned about it. What Glenn points out is there was a huge scandal in 2013, driven by daily outrage from the right and Fox. And they were right, of course, and I agree, that the Obama DOJ sent subpoenas to the Associated Press and Fox reporters to find the... their sources, excuse me, and of classified information. Holder stopped policy. Now Trump is doing the

Starting point is 01:52:37 same thing. It just never ceases to amaze me how stupid and blatantly hypocritical these people can all be. The point is always is they didn't care then. They just cared about using it against the political side. Now they don't care because they use it because it's in their benefit. Like anything else they're using, like FISA, like everything they're using, even though they said they wanted to stop. it takes a special kind of stupidity to not see where they are right now. And the point is that this is a problem. Whether New York Times, whether they're dishonest or not, because you're violating the idea.

Starting point is 01:53:06 And on top of everything, violating the idea of journalism and how they're supposed to work. On top of all of it, what you're really talking about here is a person who basically leaked information. Now, if it comes down to it, the person who actually did it, they can be held accountable because there's no crime being committed here. So the person leaking information didn't do it because they're a whistleblower, they did it because they wanted to potentially hurt Trump or gain something from it.

Starting point is 01:53:29 That seems like the obvious reality. If it was exposing a crime, well, they would be protected by the law, but they don't care about that either. So it all comes down to an effort to violate the idea of the freedom of the press to get what Trump wants. You can't ignore that. That's just hypocritical. Of course, here's Heggseth coming out saying to leak sensitive national defense information,

Starting point is 01:53:48 which is not even remotely what that really was, in my opinion. Everything around Trump is shirt color that day, is natural security, if they want it to be, is to betray our warriors and put them in danger. Our warriors, he's such a child. That's why the Department of War or Justice have created a joint task force to identify and prosecute leakers. They wouldn't care if what they did

Starting point is 01:54:07 was proving they committed a crime. In fact, they would probably go after them even harder. Nothing is sacred to these people. Mike Young points out, and this is a larger story that I think has been ongoing. I mean, it's not just unique to this Trump administration. It happened in his last one. And to some degree, it happened to Biden's administration.

Starting point is 01:54:22 A survey of CIA analysts reveals concern that political pressure is undermining the intelligence work of the Trump administration. Oh, God forbid, the intelligence work, but the point is about the dishonesty around it. Mike Young, right, this is from the article, two career intelligence officers got fired for refusing to say that Venezuela was directing it's a gang and it wasn't directing. I made this point the entire time. Was it a trend of Aragua and what overlap coming in this country? Yes, you can show that it exists.

Starting point is 01:54:49 MS-13, yes. The point, though, is that it was not some coordinated invasion. even by their own statements. They made it some abstract string of different entries in different places that Obama, the Biden was slowly doing. And they never cared to prove that at the end of the day, I'm sure there was a weaponized element there, as most of us who are not partisan can point out,

Starting point is 01:55:10 it's a one for the other. Here, we'll let these people in so you can use the justification to get them out. It's all about leading to the control grid or however you want to look at it. The point, though, is that they came out because they were right and said, I'm not going to argue they, it's this not true. And they needed that because the administration needed to claim they were justifying the deportations through the Insurrection Act or whatever act they were using at the time.

Starting point is 01:55:31 The three-star general got fired from his agency for accurately assessing the Iran strike damage, which we now know they were lying about. The CIA's own analysts are now telling their internal survey that they're afraid this is a pattern. Yeah, obviously. The point is, guys, nothing matters. They will, if you, you're not willing to sacrifice your own principles, your own morals, to lie for Trump, then you will get thrown to the bus. If you don't see how that reflects on the larger agenda of what they're turning this country

Starting point is 01:55:58 into, you're not paying attention. This is the ends justify the means, which, and to then, that means we can murder, rape, and kill, and torture. We can steal and rob and do whatever we want. As long as we get what we claim what we say we want it at the end. That is never the case of any honest element. Anything we've ever pretended this country was, whether it is or not, whatever we've ever pretended it was, the ends justify the means is the opposite of that.

Starting point is 01:56:22 that. The very central point in this country was the opposite, was that it matters how we get there. This is turning it all on its head for another country. Now, talking about the data center, which, of course, is very relevant and data center flock, surveillance and all of it, because what I just described is what this will cover up, right? This whole thing is about creating a structure, and of course, this is my opinion. Now, frankly, it's not, actually. My opinion is how they'll use it. The idea that they're building a control grid is publicly acknowledged, stated, pointed to, for your safety, for, you know, whatever it is, for whatever narrative that day they want to justify, it is happening.

Starting point is 01:57:00 It's the same as many of the points I'll make today. We have to get past this game. You know, the Al-Qaeda, ISIS funding, you know, overlap with the U.S. and Israel. Guys, it's a public knowledge point. At the end, I'll just say it now. There's somebody from the FSP from Ukraine publicly acknowledging the Osama bin Laden was a U.S. asset. Are we really pretending that we don't know that today?

Starting point is 01:57:19 Some people still are. The adults in the room will go, go, go. how dare you? What a conspiracy theorist, even though you can literally prove it. Check out James Corbett's work and plenty of others. Now, back to the point, this conversation about the data centers, they're building this control grid. And once we're trapped in this control grid of social credit, digital IDs and all the rest, which is other, they're emulating other places, it doesn't matter what you think anymore. Because you'll get turned off. You'll get boxed out. You'll get potentially put in some kind of digital gulog. That's what we're talking about.

Starting point is 01:57:48 Shrewd points out, and this is the data center I used for the show image today, guys. It's one of the largest ever built. See for yourself just how massive Meta's Hyperion Data Center is. It's hard to overstate just how massive it is. They write massive, Titanic, humongous. These words fail to capture the actual scale of Meta's Hyperion Data Center, now well under construction in Northeast Louisiana. The construction site is one of the largest such projects in all of the United States.

Starting point is 01:58:23 They have an interactive map here that you can check out, which shows you the different, like you can zoom in, and you can kind of see the different building parts of it. Interesting. But it is huge. Because there are city small in this. It feels like, like it's just this is, and like the one I believe that I was briefly pointing to today.

Starting point is 01:58:43 Oh, let me scroll back down. There we go. about the secondary act you might take after the activation tour, that one is 900 acres. 900 acres. I mean, it's just insane. It's absolutely insane what they are taking to make these things.

Starting point is 01:59:01 And that I'm using, it's not some kind of, like that is what it is. It's lunacy. Because it's, like I said, we'll get into now, there's something very under,

Starting point is 01:59:09 like this is seemingly designed, it feels like to create a resource, a resource choke point. They know basic, math, this is unsustainable. What they've already done if actually seen in fruition is unsustainable. We will end up in a place where we do not have the resources needed for the entirety of this country unless there's something changes importing or whatever you want to talk about. And guys, this is not an opinion. You could do the math. Now, I will point out to start,

Starting point is 01:59:35 as somebody points out in the chat, they're skeptical that this is even actually happening. Now, I can verify, for example, in these locations that these things are happening. But whether the agenda is what they frame it as or some kind of a head fake or something else, very much always ask that question, meaning that maybe they're not building these what they will, and so maybe there's no resource issue. It's certainly possible, and we should ask that. But let's go into it right now, because we do see these as if that is what their stated direction is actually what they're going to do.

Starting point is 02:00:02 First, secondary, actually, local Tennessee officials are putting data center plans on ice to consider regulations. Now, it doesn't mean stopping them. By point, though, is that there is enough pushback in some of these occasions, and you've seen it, where they're having an effect, both on flock cameras, and elsewhere. So don't stop. Keep standing up for yourself because it makes a difference. More right now than I've seen a long time. Now, this is what you're getting from the Fox News, kind of like, I just laughed at this because right now it is very clear that like surveillance and

Starting point is 02:00:36 like what this is, it's not a partisan issue. And I love when that happens because it clearly shows you that it is the whole lie. It really breaks through the lie of the two-party illusion. But it shows you that when it matters right now about Israel, I think, about many of these things, that Americans are pretty clearly on the same side. Alex Epstein posts this. The average American needs to know. Data centers are the best thing that's happened to you since fossil fuels. Okay.

Starting point is 02:01:02 All of the alleged problems with data centers are either fake or solvable. Hmm. Okay. Let's listen to this guy. For helping popularize fossil fuels and data centers are the new fossil fuels. There's something where people are just looking at the negatives and not the positives. and they're being catastrophist or defeatist instead of solutionist. I mean, what American situation reminds me of is all the people I've talked about in the poor

Starting point is 02:01:28 world. You know, you have three billion people who have very little electricity, who know nothing of what it's like to. Oh, yes, always the humanitarian, right? It's all totally about just getting electricity to people. Whether we even ask whether they want any of this, it's like trying to force the vaccines on the tribe shooting arrows at the helicopter. We all saw they don't want what you're selling, guys.

Starting point is 02:01:47 It's like you always, they freeing themselves. got to bring these things to the people who don't have them. Well, they don't want these things in a lot of cases. And if they do, they don't need you to facilitate this for them through a U.S. agenda. The reality is this is just kind of rationalizing why the thing they want is good because of a different reason. We're doing it for this reason. But hey, look at that. It helps everybody over there, even though almost always that doesn't happen. What they sell us on for all the different agendas. I mean, go down the list, do those or even the things they build. It never, the data centers are a perfect example. They do not amount to what they claim they do. Jobs and all this

Starting point is 02:02:20 different stuff. Nope, they outsourced. Nope, they've automated every time. And there's already examples of this happening. But yeah, they'll sell you on the virtues of everything they want to accomplish. And then once they get what they want, it's like they never even said it. Abundant energy. Well, you still have 300 million Americans more or less who know nothing about what it's like to have access to abundant intelligence. You know, I know a lot of really rich people since I'm in energy. And guess what they have access to? They have access to and spend lots of money on huge amounts of intelligence.

Starting point is 02:02:49 They have... What are we talking about? Do you mean like a grok that everyone has access to? No. He's talking about some kind of next level like intel using algorithms. Like, yeah, that's alarming. And if you think for one second that you're going to get access to this kind of like real-time twin, digital twin, you know, medical pre-crime, pre-crime, pre-crime,

Starting point is 02:03:08 you're not in the right way. You're living in a fantasy world. It's like any other thing that does. develops. It's floated as this egalitarian. We're all going to, and then it's privatized and only it's, look at our history. So this guy is just trying to sell you on out. It's wonderful as they build the control grid around you. Whether he knows that or not, I don't know. And I can be wrong. I have custom medical advisors. They have custom tutors. And this enables huge benefits for them and their families that most people can't even imagine. But what these days away can be abused. Like,

Starting point is 02:03:37 I'm not going to deny that if you have these things, it will gain you some like, you know, let's, for example, say that you as a child could be educated to a way that might make you more knowledgeable about certain things because it has more access to more information. Possibly, but that's not verified. But my point would be, how do we know it's the full breadth of information, right? Or are you just being propagandized into a very, you know, a dutiful citizen of the empire? That's what this comes down to. In every situation in history, that's what ends up happening.

Starting point is 02:04:04 The information and the control flow of information is paramount, even to this very, day. And I think that's what it comes down to. The data centers are doing is they're making this accessible to everybody. So, you know, I have a two-year-old and an eight-month-old. By the time their school age, they'll have access to genius tutors that will be basically free. I already have access to genius medical advice that can be life-saving. Why would it be free? I mean, what world do you think you live in? You know what I mean? Like, this is just, I think at some core point, he knows he's promising the world that will never happen because I bet you more than anything. I don't even know who this is.

Starting point is 02:04:40 But I'm willing to bet you if you dig in that he's got some kind of financial connection or some other kind of profiteering, you know, opportunist connection to all of this happening. Just my gut. You can look into it. I could be wrong. Certainly life improving. Like these data centers are unbelievable. And the average American needs to know, hey, these things are the best thing that ever happened to you since fossil fuels. And number two, that all of the alleged problems with them are either made up or sometimes they're real, but they're solvable. So if we take a solutionist attitude toward this and all made up, but sometimes are real, but those are probably, that's just a dumb way to say that. Don't let the defeatists win. We can have an amazing future with AI.

Starting point is 02:05:19 If we don't, then guess what? We're going to be a lot poorer than we need to be. A lot of people lack access to opportunity. And absolutely, it's a national security risk with respect to China. God, just lay it all on, right? And China, this or that. I mean, that's not even remotely true. Seeing as how the U.S. government, by their own statistics, has what, 12 times the amount of China?

Starting point is 02:05:37 And at 45, last I checked anyway, 45% of the global building of bad centers. I mean, they're just, whether he doesn't know, whether he's just relaying what he was told and doesn't know he's wrong or selling you on this for his own purposes. That's just crazy. Even though what was the last party he said, can have an amazing future with AI. If we don't, then guess what? We're going to be a lot poorer than we need. Or like, like how do we ever survive without AI?

Starting point is 02:06:01 I just don't believe any of this. And I think historically, I think it's pretty damn obvious that this doesn't work out the way he's framing it. that it's going to be something given to the people for the benefit of all. Just not how this works. Now, Wall Street Ape shares this. Data Center in Ohio, centers in Ohio, are preparing to discharge their water usage directly into lakes and streams, and the EPA is working on permits to let them do it. So there's two things to talk about here.

Starting point is 02:06:28 The usage of fresh water, and as we'll get into when they don't need to do that, because they could clearly be using other types of water, non-potable water that might just have more, they would cost them more in managing it. It shouldn't even be a conversation. And at top of that, unless it's being the, there's evaporated cooling where the water ultimately gets evaporated, which is another point, whether it's whatever they're using it,

Starting point is 02:06:51 it couldn't even be reused at that point. But the other ones, if it's not evaporated, it gets dumped. And it can be reused. That's part of what they're doing. But realize that what you're talking about is dangerous, like contaminated water that's going to go into your lakes and streams. It's like Flint's a little bit different the way it happened, but it's a similar point. Right?

Starting point is 02:07:11 They're choosing to do something they know will hurt innocent people for the data centers. The Ohio EPA is drafting permits to let the wastewater flow straight into our lakes and streams. Oh, you know what? Let me make sure. No, I thought I did grab this. Oh, is that it right here? Oh, yeah, I think this is it. On average, a single data center uses a half billion gallons of water a day for cooling,

Starting point is 02:07:37 according to industry reports. Some of that wastewater could be discharged into Ohio's lakes and streams under a permitting process under review by the Ohio EPA. Environmental groups have concerns about the impact to water quality in rural communities. It's like a small city, the discharge that will come out of these. And that will, you know, if they don't have a sewage treatment plant, that will go into the streams or the river or another body of water. Under the Ohio EPA's proposal, data centers that qualify for the water discharge, We get a five-year permit to release water used to cool down tech components. This is very real.

Starting point is 02:08:15 The EPA is proposing those permits to let data centers dump all that water into the lakes and streams. The Ohio EPA proposed a general permit, this one right here, to streamline the approvals for data center discharges of wastewater and storm water. Streamline largely meaning that you have no, there's no point for you to step in and be like, but we object. Just jump right over that because they don't care. This covers a couple different kinds of water. I'm willing to bet you just like before. And we just played that clip of somebody asking a local council. You know, tell me if you have any signed contracts or NDAs with these companies.

Starting point is 02:08:49 And most of them refuse to answer. Meaning that in these cases, I'm willing to bet you that in some way or another, usually in ways they can rationalize as legal, some kind of kickback or something, where they benefit from these things. Just like with Flint, they benefited. The local government wildly benefited from switching to the local, the switching water supplies, which is what caused them all to get sick. And as far as they could tell, they've never actually solved that problem.

Starting point is 02:09:12 Welcome to America. Allow direct discharge into river streams or Lake Erie under certain conditions. Permits would be for five years. So the EPA is reviewing everything. The agency says it's maintaining water quality protections, but it is necessary for economic growth data centers bring jobs and tax revenue. See, this is how they do this. So you're saying, it's okay.

Starting point is 02:09:34 I know your children make it sick. a cancer. It might poison your water supply, but you know, jobs and stuff, which will not equate. It happens every time. They're willing to let these concerns kind of go off to the side because of the potential jobs and tax revenue, which is what it says right there, even thermal. The hot water they release can actually harm the life, not even getting into what it actually does to the water. Chemicals potential for biocides, metals, other additives, massive withdrawals and discharges from strained local water bodies, especially during droughts. rental.

Starting point is 02:10:06 Warrant of risk of drinking water, recreation. Yeah, who cares about all the things that our population who puts us in power, we pretend, all actually care about. We're going to sell you on revenue that we won't give to you, that will sell back. It's just we are living in such a corrupt time. It's insane. But how long have we been talking about this? Rampet lawlessness.

Starting point is 02:10:25 It is an addictive thing for people in power. We know that there's not really that many jobs that come with these things. It's really just a scam. So there's concerns being really. are thermal pollution, the hot water can harm aquatic life. Chemicals, there are real causes during drought. You're in drought, mental groups, like the Great Lakes Group, ecosystem. So there are real risks here and wild.

Starting point is 02:10:52 And these are just certain examples. It is happening all over the country. Now, it's a water point, which I think is very relevant. Someone in a family recently put me on to this. And it's funny that I didn't even ask this yet. Because, I mean, I was focused on the larger point of it, right? The idea of just the water usage. But I didn't know, like, there, actually, again, I'm the kind of shock that I didn't think,

Starting point is 02:11:14 well, why would they need to use fresh water, right? It doesn't even make sense. So this is from the Florida Water and Pollution Control Operators Association. And this is just kind of breaking down myth versus reality of the data centers. There's actually a lot of good information in this. The main point to me, industry estimates show that roughly 75 to 90% of data centers worldwide rely on water-based cooling as their primary method. Now, first, so meaning there are other things they could do.

Starting point is 02:11:43 That's first. There's a choice, probably because as usual, it's easier, it costs less. That's always what it comes down to. Not that it's not possible. But of course, we've got to beat China or whatever the narrative becomes, right? Now it says, what about using non-drinking water? Non-potable, it can be called. Unfortunately, most of that cooling water has historically come from potable sources, drinking

Starting point is 02:12:06 water, like municipal water or groundwater. So the water you need for your family, for your life, for your garden. That's what they have always accessed. 80 to 90% of the water used by data centers is drawn from blue water sources, like lakes, rivers, aquifers, often the same sources providing community drinking water. In practice, many data centers simply hook up to the local water mains. We know this. This is why Trump pretended they were going to use their own stuff.

Starting point is 02:12:34 They're not. I mean, how many times can he lie around? right to your faces, guys. We're going to make sure they don't use your energy. That's, they're lying. There's countless examples of people's energy bills going up. I've got one today. Or the idea of water being a problem because they're just, as the show, the majority of them do, the opposite of what Trump promised they would do. Now, it says, for example, London County, Virginia, the world's largest data center hub supplied around one billion gallons of water plus or minus to data centers in 2023, mostly relying on treated potable water because

Starting point is 02:13:09 reclaimed water capacity was insufficient. So that's basically a choice in a cycle, right? Because they aren't, there's not enough of the reclaimed water issue, which is basically just finding other ways to reuse water that could otherwise be reused, not enough. I find that impossible to believe, first of all, but even if it was, You could fix that if you cared. But my main point is that there are way, like right now, if you just said as a government, well, you're not allowed to use our water.

Starting point is 02:13:40 Figure it out. As a government should care more about it people than the agenda, right? But no, they care more about the agenda than you. So the game is, well, we know you need it, but they do more. Or rather, we need what they're doing, so we need it more. So we'll steal your water, even though we could let them use other water, which would cost more and maybe slow down the agenda, even though we're way ahead. anyway. That's the truth. They are, anyway, 12 times the amount. Now, it goes on. However,

Starting point is 02:14:08 a growing number of data centers are now shifting to recycled water. It's a small number, but it's growing. Tech giants have begun partnering with utilities to use treated water, wastewater, for cooling instead of fresh green water. Now, this is a small amount, and it's only happening, in my opinion, because there's so much pushback. I feel like it's a feigned element. It is like a, you know, here's a new one we're trying, and it's only partly, and we're only doing it sometimes, even though every other one they're doing is not. For example, Google uses reclaimed or non-potable water at over 25% of its data center campuses, and not meaning that they only use that. As you just saw, they're telling you it's not enough. So the point is 25%, not even all of them, they use it when they can.

Starting point is 02:14:53 I doubt that. And so there's nothing binding them they're going to use what they need to use, especially when it comes down to their profit. and Trump or Biden or whoever else is allowing that. Now, it says Amazon Web Services announced in 20-203 that 20 of its centers, only 20 out of however many they have, are cooling with purified wastewater instead of potable water. So in a sense, wastewater, they're then to purify before they can use. Okay, so the sum of it happening. Most data centers worldwide are still using fresh water for cooling.

Starting point is 02:15:24 That's a fact. As of right now, that's very clearly the reality. Now, go to the next part. Oops, shoot, I'm glad I kept that highlighted. Here's the article. From the American Society of Civil Engineers, you know, that propaganda signed, as always, you know, anytime it's challenging larger narrative, it's that they're the fringe or they're politically motivated, and always possible, always ask.

Starting point is 02:15:44 From 2024, engineers often need a lot of water to keep data centers cool. Now, this is still currently the reality. It says, why don't more data center? Because the last one was more of the current, like, you know, some of them are trying to do something different. Why don't more data centers, center operators monitor water usage? First and foremost, well, more than 60% simply publicly tell you there's no business justification to do that. And do you know why there's no business justification? Because the government or anybody else involved doesn't care. Now, if they said, well, hey, you've got to make sure you're monitoring

Starting point is 02:16:20 your water because our people might die. Well, they would then have to do that. Otherwise, they wouldn't get the contract. You see that works? So the government is going, well, the corporations are going to be as slimy and gross as the government allows them to be. Or, you know, whatever other tangential government enforcement elements. And that's the truth. That's why if they're rambling lawless, well, so too were all the companies that they're now merging with in the first place. But 60% will happily go, well, we don't need to. Why would we do that?

Starting point is 02:16:46 And from a business perspective, they're not wrong. So your government is part of this. And this is where you get into a whole fascistic kind of blending of government, corporate entity and the government. That's what we're dealing with. That's why they don't care because they're also profiting. But down here, data centers can use numerous water supply sources, including potable, drinkable water, treated, affluent water, or reclaimed recycled water. The quality of the cooling water, however, can affect the equipment's useful life. God forbid, right? Reclaimed water, for example, meaning used other than what you need for drinking, can cause more corrosion, scaling, microbiological growth in the equipment than does potable water.

Starting point is 02:17:25 there you go, guys, we would have to spend more. So God forbid that your life and safety and your children's lives and safety should matter more than whether these billionaire companies have to spend a little bit more on the equipment they need to build out the new control grid around your life, which will then give them billions more dollars. Now, I'm not going to try to diminish the probably lots and lots of money. But when it's when you really factor in somebody like, you know, the old state, like you taking whoever it is today, probably Elon Musk, actually it is, the most richest person alive,

Starting point is 02:17:55 the argument was back in the day with Bill Gates. And this was like a mathematical thing. He could sit there hypothetically having just piles of $100 bills in front of him and shovel it into a fire. And hypothetically a fire that would never go out, right? Just shovel it into the fire. That the math was that he's making so much money in interest while he stands there that he could not burn it fast enough,

Starting point is 02:18:17 that he's still making money while he's shoveling $100 bills in the fire. That's just so grotesque. The point here is that this is where we are. these people are so wealthy, and we're talking about the billionaire tech companies, the massive data center, yes, they're very rich. And the idea is that you could create a circumstance that would actually make people's lives matter, and they would spend a little bit more. But no, your government with them is choosing to put your life in the line so they can make a

Starting point is 02:18:43 profit and, you know, arguably do better than everybody else. That's what happens when you get a CEO-run government, guys. Welcome to technocracy. Welcome to Prospera and the C-Setting movement and the network. state agenda, the oligarch run. Yeah, this is what they're selling you. I hope you're paying attention. Oh, you know what? I forgot to download. I forgot to this. I got distracted while I was grabbing this. I forgot. This is, I need to go to the Facebook download. Let's see if I can grab this real quick. This is a clip about a local person in Tennessee,

Starting point is 02:19:17 I believe, speaking about the data centers. I just want people to see it's everywhere. People are coming out to stand up for this. And I hope you so. support them. You are not going to get a lot of return. Where was that? Here we go. We've heard a lot about water, how these things take water and how they pollute water. We've heard about power. Some states, power bills almost doubled because of how much power these things take. I want to take, really talk about two things. How does this affect livestock? How does it affect cows, horses, and everything else? And then what we can actually do about it is I actually disagree that we're powerless. I believe we actually have a lot of power that we can use that they don't realize.

Starting point is 02:20:08 I talked to a... Oh, I'm sorry, it was Texas. There's an overlapping with all the stuff today with the Tennessee ones and we're hopefully going to protest. Either way, same conversation. They were promised that it wouldn't affect their bills and it is anyway.

Starting point is 02:20:22 Promised it would affect their water and it is anyway. It's not a new story. Farmer, just north of Dallas, a data center went up right across his farm. Two straight years, no new caps. Stillburst. If that noise and heat does that to the cattle, what is it going to do to our horses?

Starting point is 02:20:38 I mean, look, that's assuming that all he's really talking about is the heat and the noise. I mean, it's certainly possible that alone could cause that, but every one of them are still births. That seems like something more of a pollutant, something else entirely, guys. This is not the first time I've heard this. They're going to do to us. That noise can travel up to five miles, and the heat dome, these things create, also travel up to five miles. Not only do they take our water, not only do they take our land, not only do they cause pollution, but the light pollution, harms our livestock. The noise pollution harms our livestock and ourselves, and so it is the heat.

Starting point is 02:21:14 And I want to address, you know, one of the elephants in the room because these big tech folks, they want us to believe that we are powerless. That's what they want. They say, we're inevitable. I actually disagree. I think we are the ones that are inevitable. Because this is the deal. I argue they're illegal. I do believe these data centers are illegal. There are people are standing up everywhere, guys. Very important. So more perfect union put another clip here about another Zuckerberg data center in basically in Louisiana, the size of Manhattan. The clip you can watch, Meta now says the data center will cost over $50 billion.

Starting point is 02:22:04 And of course, the state is giving the tech giant a 20-year tax exemption. You know, it's like this is designed guys. And they don't care what it does to the local communities. They just try to pretend that it's only going to be for your benefit. And even now, as people are protesting everywhere, they just act like you're the problem. Here is Daily Mail. Deadly bacteria founded major U.S. City's wastewater system tied to Mark Zuckerberg's $800 million data center. One second.

Starting point is 02:22:40 Checking something. Okay, good. No. So this is not, we showed you this in the last show, the last, I believe it was the last one. Now, who's to say whether this was, you know, bottom line is that this is something that it demonstrates the lack of concern for the surrounding environment, whether this is malfeasance or just kind of like the logical side effect of whatever they're putting in the environment, deadly bacteria found in major U.S. city's wastewater system tied to Mark Zuckerberg's $800 million

Starting point is 02:23:11 data center. You think it's going to stop it? This one's in Wyoming. Nope, they're doing it in Louisiana. They're doing it in Texas. Doing it in every single state in this country. And you realize that these things are secondary thoughts. It's happening everywhere and no one's even slowing down.

Starting point is 02:23:25 Your government doesn't care. All data centers are consuming this one writes 264 billion gallons of water as droughts hit 63% of the United States. Future historians, this person writes, are going to have a nightmare trying to explain why. We ran out of drinking water because we needed to cool down the machines generating 4K AI fruit videos. You know, joking, kind of. But, you know, if this is real and this is directions going in, this seems like a design choke point. or that they just care that little about our lives that they're willing to do this, right in our faces.

Starting point is 02:24:00 Now, overlapping this with the flock conversation, which I also think is important, we just talked, this is the same episode I was pointing to before. The flock revolution is about the idea of people standing up to specifically the flock cameras, but it's only one. It's only one example of a larger agenda, but it matters. And I think, and we should also be aware,

Starting point is 02:24:19 as I pointed out last time, just like I said about the data center point or any of these, be aware that maybe this is being used to distract us. Maybe the flock was a red herring and it's going to be a different one. The point is they exist and as long as people are standing up and becoming aware of the larger surveillance agenda and the violation of our rights, I think it's a net positive. But nonetheless, be aware because there's tons of grifters who are out there talking about flock.

Starting point is 02:24:41 And I argue at some point you're going to see a turn where it's some kind of a rationalization or, you know, whatever it is. But even though it's being used, it doesn't mean that anybody else talking about is therefore It could just be that you don't know it's being used. Or maybe you were making points that are about, which I think is happening. I think Jason Bassler and plenty of others are making very good points every day about why this needs to be stopped. But as the rest of the grifting new media tries to use it, be aware of that too. It's just about questioning everything, right?

Starting point is 02:25:08 And so when this becomes weirdly allowed on this platform, whatever else, like that feels like I agree. I sense there's something here happening. But at the same time, regardless of any of it, it violates your rights. It's illegal that it's happening in general. ultimately this is being used to collect your data and create some kind of massive database, ISIS using them, like all these things are real. So it matters. We also talked about the idea of you're being called a terrorist if you resist data centers

Starting point is 02:25:31 or any of this. And Israel's clear infiltration of flock and AI surveillance through many different companies like everything else we're talking about. Even Robert Barnes. I'd say that because he's somebody who seemed to blindly support Trump all until he suddenly didn't. Security researcher Ben Jordan reveals that flock cameras are so. secretly creating a GPS tracker for every car in America, and it's already live.

Starting point is 02:25:54 Now, this is no different. I mean, technically this is, I'll get into a couple points around this. We talked about Leonardo and signet trace and site and all these different examples of all connected to Israel, like literally packed to the hilt with Israeli intelligence on every one of these companies. This is about talking, is discussing the idea of, um, the tracking of the, of the cars through these cameras, not necessarily adding a new technology to it, which is just insane. But then once they add this,

Starting point is 02:26:21 which I think is already happening, these cameras have already been shown, as I've talked about in that last episode, I just showed you, being a terrorist if you resist these things, Leonardo and signal trace, they can simply add these onto the cameras. I bet you it's already happening,

Starting point is 02:26:33 and they can absorb your text message when you walk by. They can literally access Wi-Fi, devices, and all kinds of stuff. It's in their own documentation, tied directly to Israel. Surprise, surprise. But as Robert writes, Fourth Amendment violation,

Starting point is 02:26:45 They're pretty simple. Why doesn't that matter? It should. Shall not be infringed until they infringe on all of it for their current agenda that day. Yesterday in Green County, a deputy was arrested. Oh, actually, that was the wrong one. Oh, it's this one. License plate readers take a timestamped photo of every vehicle that passes every camera.

Starting point is 02:27:09 Police can search your historical travel information for 30 days. This creates a searchable database of everyone, not just the suspects of crime. Security researcher. And this day for days, guys, you could prove it goes, they don't, they use it. They sell it. So this is sort of a mainstreamy coverage of this. It just shows you that it's definitely getting in to the everyone's consciousness.

Starting point is 02:27:31 But just realize that they say, hold it for days. It's like, no, no. It's been very clearly shown that they don't have anything sacred. As I showed you that local county who rescinded the contract because they signed it, and the part in the contract that said they will not sell your data that they signed was removed later. even though they signed it. And so they removed their contract with them. I mean, just thank God that people have some honest people in their county.

Starting point is 02:27:54 And Jordan. And it's like if you were to build a graph of that sheet, you know, and plot it to a map. Now it's as if you've had a GPS on your car for an entire month. By your own publications, 700,000 crimes a year are solved with flock. Flock safety chief communications officer Josh Thomas. Reported crimes in America. Yeah. So there's a lot more that probably are being helped that aren't being reported.

Starting point is 02:28:16 But yes, we have about 700,000 crimes that we are aware of that are being solved in part with evidence that's derived from a flock to safety device. And we've already shown you many times, right? Like two examples on Twitter that even the back of the community note system called out where they claim that, look, we solve this crime. And then the local police department comes out and says we didn't even utilize that. Like that was superfluous. It wasn't even part of the investigation. So why did they have to lie about it? would they brandish all these examples when those examples start to be false? Maybe because they're not

Starting point is 02:28:50 being honest about how it works at all, guys. In order for that historical data to be of investigative value, you have to track every car for 30 days. Again, I would challenge you on the word track. Tracking the whole of your movements is very different than knowing that you pass by one specific camera, 24 specific cameras. Those are different things. Yeah, of course, unless those cameras are in every street corner, which is what they're building towards, but also it's already been used, even with limited information, to unjustly arrest people who were not guilty.

Starting point is 02:29:18 I've already playing those videos for you, simply because they drove by a camera and ended up in another location where they used that to go, well, you're most likely to the case, and then arrest that person. And I'll show you an example next, where they ended up in jail for days, even though they weren't guilty.

Starting point is 02:29:31 And then the examples of tracking that vehicle from location to location to location. But Flock's own webinars, talk about its license plate readers ability to track vehicles and people. If you want to know how bad this Flock camera situation is, just watch the first 24 seconds of this video. Flock says its cameras don't track people.

Starting point is 02:29:54 Its own training videos say otherwise. See, that's an inherently dishonest point. Like, that guy is knowingly lying to you. So is the guy from Flock, like openly deceiving you and gets called out every day on Twitter. That's why they've turned off all their comments. Like, they know what they're doing. Now, that's insane to think about a company that's what's got 5,000, 6,000 followers on Twitter. It's reasonably new.

Starting point is 02:30:16 Clearly as a contract throughout this entire country with our government and nobody wants it. And it's just kind of quietly growing anyway. You're not, you have no influence on what happens to this country if you haven't caught on by now, guys. At the very least, not enough to do anything about it. And that's not, that's not, I'm not saying that so we go give up. I'm saying that we need to realize where we are so we can fight back to actually controlling the direction of our country. Watch this. My mouth literally dropped within 24 seconds. I'll play a little bit more for you, but just this first part is wild. Pay very close attention to when he says, this is a police department and these are all the other agencies and departments that it's sharing its information with. It's mind-blowing. It's literally crazy. Watch this. In Boulder, Colorado, inside a small coffee shop.

Starting point is 02:31:04 The brighter areas are where the really high density of flat cameras are. Will Freeman runs the largest police camera tracking system in the nation. If you click on any of these police departments, it'll show you who they're sharing with. So the lines going outward are the audiences that can access. They get it directly. It's called D-Flock. The app shows where the cameras are and which way they're pointed. How many cameras have you mapped?

Starting point is 02:31:31 88,970 cameras at the moment. Why did you want to do this? The main reason is to show people how invasive this is. Now, the case that was confusing because it's a clip, you know, it's like a part. The deflock, as you guys know, because of what we've covered and plenty of others, is the site built to track that. But what they were highlighting is that the information that they show through their own flock information demonstrates that it's obviously more than just a short-term tracking,

Starting point is 02:31:58 but also that it doesn't connect to other people. This is why the ice overlap comes in. And ICE has personally bragged about this, that they use it to track people. So they know they're lying to you. And I hope that really resonates with what this. The company has to lie about that. What are they really doing?

Starting point is 02:32:16 Jason Bassler ads, want to hate Flock more? Flock actually runs an integrative monitoring interface called Nova. It gives cops a single screen that merges the automatic license plate reader hits, dispatch logs, jail records, and public data. So it's with every other aspect they've now merged together that Israel also has access to because they've made those agreements. Turning your city surveillance into a real-time search engine. Big loss for civil liberties.

Starting point is 02:32:41 It just doesn't stop. That's not even new. Jason Bassler, Flock isn't the only concern. Ever heard of the Axon light post? It's a networked surveillance node with microchips, cameras, real-time feeds, flock tracks plates, and everything else as we've already shown, Axon LP tracks everything around them,

Starting point is 02:33:01 which I'm arguing is just basically what Flock is turning into and already probably is to some degree. Two companies, one goal, the normalization of total surveillance. I mean, these light posts are what you're seeing in places like the UK. I mean, this is happening, guys. It's just, it's amazing. We can't, like, where is the real,

Starting point is 02:33:18 like, you know, like what we're seeing with Flock, even though I'm worried that it will start to be used or misrepresented is a real pushback. there are real Americans who truly stand up and do this because they recognize this is something bigger than just block cameras. I think that's obvious. Now, this goes into something more that you might have seen going around, and it's not something that should be ignored, but as far as I can tell, it's not actually happening yet. Wired cover this in 2023.

Starting point is 02:33:42 Axon's ethics board resigned over taser-armed drones. So, well, as we've seen in many other examples in this government or other companies in this country, Axon's ethics board, the board resigned because, they didn't like the direction of the ethics board. So clearly the company didn't care about ethics. Then the company bought a military drone maker. So it's not a secret where Axon is going. But the question is whether or not they actually followed through with taser-armed drones

Starting point is 02:34:08 because the patent was clear. The argument is they didn't really do it because the board guys resigned. But as they say, they then went on to buy a military drone maker. So it feels like it kind of went forward. At the moment, it's not shown to be deployed or used anywhere as far as I could tell. But it is real. Now, on that note, just a random coincidence, June 29, 2026, hey, Trump bought as much as $5 billion in Axon stock before ICE sought $220 million

Starting point is 02:34:35 taser deal. It's almost like you can't hide from this stuff. So whether they're drone tasers or not, you're working with a company that is helping ICE using this data who uses drones, who makes tasers, that maybe one day very recently they'll put those things together. Like, is it even not hard, wrap your mind around? Trump benefiting from it is just the icing on the stupid

Starting point is 02:34:54 corruption cake that we're pointing to. That's just insane, guys. I've never seen such blatant corruption in my life. As the article writes, Axon Software works to combine live fees for body cameras, drones, fixed cameras and other sources. So like Jason was just talking about,

Starting point is 02:35:12 the thing they're doing that they've already built is actually designed to combine these things together. It's like a design to do that. It's crazy, right? Axon announced a ring partnership in 2025 that we've talked about already. That lets ring users voluntarily, not even close to what's actually happening, share footage with law enforcement through their evidence platform.

Starting point is 02:35:32 Now, in many cases, there are things that you like check the box for agreeing to the term service, don't even realize that you've allowed them to access your thing, or in other cases, they just do it without asking. But what we found is they can access your ring camera, they can access your Tesla or whatever else for national security, for, you know, crime, or maybe just because we want to cap that immigrant. They're doing that, and they're using it everywhere. I shouldn't say everywhere in the sense that's all the time everywhere,

Starting point is 02:35:55 but there's been examples of it all across the country, and it is happening. Axons, was it, Fusus platform, separately aggregates shared community cameras, body cameras, drones, and other feeds in a real-time map. So they're creating what is a real-time database as he was just highlighting, the map that you can access, as well as the actual combination of the different devices they're using that they put out. It's almost like it's very public, isn't it? It's almost like this isn't a theory at all. Crazy, right?

Starting point is 02:36:24 Jason Bassler, and we showed you this already, the new gold standard of anti-surveillance accountability just dropped. People have been getting cease and desist letters because they're talking about flock cameras. Come to the attention of flock group that you have engaged in conduct involving an unauthorized dissemination of photographs, videos, memes, screenshots. Yeah, welcome to the woke right.

Starting point is 02:36:45 Or whatever you want to call it, because it's not right or left, but there's plenty of people on the right who are defending this and saying it's wrong for you to break these things down. It's against the law. You know, clearly because they care about the law everywhere else. No. The point is that, you know, if you're going to scream about them, you know, memes and pictures and how dare you? And then you're just the same as what you made fun of. Now, Jason Bassler.

Starting point is 02:37:04 Oh, actually, damn it, I forgot this one too. Let me grab this. I did want to play this because I find this really revealing. This guy just screams some kind of ins. I mean, he seems to just go, you know, Epstein's a cool guy. How dare you not release the files and whatever? This guy just plays like this weird bipolar kind of, you know, who knows?

Starting point is 02:37:23 Maybe it's just about clicks and shares. He gets a lot of attention. But Nick, Point is, and I'm not going to get into the dumb, ongoing personality wars going on. He has a statement about flock cameras that Jason talks about. Does I grab that already? I think so. And it's just this typical, you know, I don't even want to read it.

Starting point is 02:37:41 I'll just play it for you and we'll talk about it. But it is a very telling take on all this. So let me grab this for you. And the whole point is that, as we know, there are people all over the place who are acting, whether you agree with the action or not, who are taking, you know, taking down cameras, what they believe is their right to act against an unjust law. And in fact, I don't disagree. The question is, well, the power structure care, whether you think you're right or the constitutional rights support you.

Starting point is 02:38:15 Here we go. Here's what Nick Flint has to say about people taking down. on flock cameras. About the good work, brother. Thank you, man. Appreciate it. You go more like Freiko sent $20. Sorry if you've answered this.

Starting point is 02:38:30 But what do you think about people destroying flock cameras? I am oh too risky, too reckless. It's dumb. It's dumb. And it's not going to stop it. That's not the way they're putting them up. They put up like a thousand of them every day. So I think that's just a LARP.

Starting point is 02:38:43 Well, definitely don't shoot him with a BB gun. It's like grow up. Will you fucking grow up already? Stop the LARP. $4.20 cent, $100. I mean, okay, you know, so you could argue, or was that, there we go. Well, first I'll read what Jason said. It's dumb and it's not going to stop it. And he says, calling pushback dumb is peak defeatism. What's the alternative? Allow our kids to inherit a permanent tracking grid. Now look, you may are, he's there's some level of the point there, right? Is this meant

Starting point is 02:39:19 to do, is this meant to serve the opposite? Are we being led into some kind of action that we used against us? That's certainly possible. But I agree with Jason's point. What? is your alternative? It's happening. They're building them and you're just going to use it against you. Okay, then what? Innevatively let it happen regardless. That's like the other guy's argument. If you cut them down, they're only going to build them faster. Okay, then, your answer is then do nothing and let it be built irregardless. Or just to as clear, I said regardless. I never would say the word irregardless. The point is build them regardless. I just, I think that's an insane stance take. And I'm not suggesting, maybe they do have an answer.

Starting point is 02:39:56 Maybe there's another thing they think they should do. But what I thought was very relevant, as he says, apathy isn't wisdom, submission isn't an option. I pointed out, well, one could almost call this being blackpilled. You know, exactly what people like this called us when we were telling you what was going to come. With Trump, with Iran, with tech doctor, the whole thing. Israel. And that's why the IMA was created. We've talked about it many times.

Starting point is 02:40:19 These, like Alex Jones, leading charge, black pill, purity test. And we were right. Like many of the times before that, demonstrating. our value. In this case, you may not agree with the physical action. There's plenty of other ways to push back on this, but to simply just grow up already because of the law, quit larping. Everything his entire thing is. The whole partisan thing, that's the LARP, guys, playing into the partisan division. I mean, come on, I know people can see this by now. He may be entertaining, and maybe he even means what he says. I don't know. But what I do know is that anybody playing

Starting point is 02:40:51 into the division tactics and all of this is part of something leading you astray. DeFlock pointing out so his argument, you know, who, what are you going to do? Don't push basically you're dumb if you do something about it. Or violently or rather just physically is his point. D.Flock, saga out of Volusa County. Florida, 23-year-old woman spent 13 days in jail, 13 for a fatal hit and run. Instead of comprehensive investigation, you know what they're paid for, the Florida Highway Patrol allegedly leaned heavily on a single flock camera peeing like

Starting point is 02:41:26 I just told you. So that person was pinged right when this Saturday. That must be them, right? Turns out, in case you missed the point, wasn't them. Read the article right here that she was falsely accused. She was not guilty. 13 days in jail. And so what, so Nick Flentis, what do you suggest?

Starting point is 02:41:44 As people are being arrested by the state that you seem to support here and there for things they didn't do because a camera that violates our rights in the first place and shouldn't even be installed is building out around us. Now, sure, you may not agree with the action, taking it down, but what else do you, I mean, fill in the blank, guys, because none of those people are saying, well, that we should do this instead. I mean, I don't, I'll leave it there. It just kills me, guys, because this is a crazy time

Starting point is 02:42:11 where what's happening is very real and very, very provable. And people like that want to gaslight you into thinking that, I don't know, voting is going to make it something different, go out for the midterms. How is that still happening? The Patriotic Blonde, nine more officers have been arrested and discharged from duty for using flock cameras. It's just one after another, guys, and some will go, that's showing you the system works.

Starting point is 02:42:35 Well, it's not because we just showed you people getting arrested without charge. It's exactly the problem. And this is not a bite. This is the system, guys, because it's happening everywhere because there's no real structure here. Hired. Investigators say, Kuenisha Goss access flock data for personal reasons multiple times over the of three months without law enforcement justification. A similar story in South Georgia.

Starting point is 02:43:01 Five Albany officers were arrested on Monday. You see their names listed there. The GBI says in internal audit found that the officers use the flock system multiple times for non-law enforcement purposes. All of those officers have been fired. And just a few weeks ago in Cherokee County, our own Atlanta News First Investigation found these three deputies have been fired for allegedly misusing flock.

Starting point is 02:43:23 Sergeant Mike Creedon, Lieutenant Chris Ryan, and Deputy Cynthia Jodice were all charged earlier this week. No, look, I'm glad they're held accountable. The real question, though, on top of all of it, is will they actually be? Announcing something is very different than seeing it in the fruition, right? Whether these people get dropped and removed to the department, which is what usually happens behind the scenes. It's like the Catholic Church and the pedophilia conversation,

Starting point is 02:43:49 well, they go, how dare, then they move into a quiet church somewhere else or no one, where there's still plenty of children. It's not a secret. So I don't know. I mean, I will say that I'm glad it's happening. I'm glad they're being pointed to. But the real question is not even about whether this show is the system working. It's the abuse is possible.

Starting point is 02:44:06 Why are we building a system where anybody who has access to it can choose to use it for negative purposes? Like that is, and the question on top of that is he's just a local enforcer. What happens when the government chooses to use it for bad purposes? Well, guess what? There's no one to hold him accountable. We just talked about that. you don't let it happen in the first place, guys. You don't rationalize why the bad thing might be okay because look, it works.

Starting point is 02:44:29 It violates your rights. You know, it's like these things need to be the starting point, guys. And this is the whole problem is that there are people that are pushing this to a degree that might even believe they have the right intention, but it's just it's broken. The logic isn't there. Jason writes, they want you to believe your voice doesn't matter. Yet in the last few days alone, LAPD canceled his flock contract, meta canceled Muse Image AI after privacy outrage, one of the large,

Starting point is 02:44:52 one of the largest planned U.S. data centers was killed by local opposition. The surveillance state isn't inevitable. It advances when people are apathetic. That's what we were just pointing to. It retreats when people fight back. It can anyway. Public pressure works. Can keep pushing.

Starting point is 02:45:10 100% agree with that. Los Angeles Police Department is ending its agreement with surveillance tech company, flock safety, as he was highlighting. LAPD said the language that's in the agreement. over how the data is being used and collected that flock has been asked to re-examine it. It's like everything else, guys. And I don't even know if they really cared. I think they just know that people are paying attention.

Starting point is 02:45:32 See, that's what really comes down to is the worry of accountability. And the idea is that they know the contract's broken. Flock is a criminal organization as far as I can tell. I mean, the idea that you're just simply removing things from contracts. And you understand, they can come at you and sue and call, you know, you've deceased and for saying things they argue are inflammatory. You could prove this. I can show you the local county that.

Starting point is 02:45:52 literally rescinded the contract because they on record in a public government meeting said that flock removed the sentence after it was signed or the many other examples where they're violating what they're i mean or the sharing information holding it too long selling it all of these things it matters this is what i was saying earlier i'll read what this person said and this is another post uh texas the the police in houston according to his report anyway are panicking and having a start they started an immediate investigation as citizens continue to destroy flock cameras. Good. I think it's a good thing people are choosing to stand up. The police are starting to make a single arrest because nobody in the city is assisting

Starting point is 02:46:31 them. You see how this works? And this is clearly something that I think, now, you may disagree with a tactic. Like I too argue that going, like you're talking about a tactic that could be perceived to be more, you know, lawless in its own way. And that's a fair argument. I happen to disagree because what we're dealing with is lawless enforcement from the get-go. You're dealing with something that is lawless as it's being placed in. Stopping that does not seem lawless to me. But either way, the point is there's a fair argument you made about a different path that could be taken. And this person says, doesn't it make you guys even slightly skeptical that this narrative has been so prominent on here pretty much 24-7 over a week now and is being pushed by so many bad actors? Is that being black-pilled?

Starting point is 02:47:07 Now, first of all, yes, we're slightly skeptical, as I pointed out more than once. And Jason has mentioned it as well. So the argument somehow, I'm not saying this is what here putting forward, but others have point, you know, put in our face that were just so blindly supportive of the thing. That's not true. this is usually what you get from the partisan kind of game, where it's all or nothing, or they hear from Flintas what they say we're saying, which isn't even accurate.

Starting point is 02:47:28 I've seen Fentas say things about Whitney Webb that were verifiably false, that then get shared by others as fact forever. That's what happens, because they don't do their diligence, they don't care, they're fast and loose with their language. And I simply said, no, it's a valid question.

Starting point is 02:47:41 First of all, no, it's not black pill, right? Because it is a valid question. To consider it, I went over at my last show, as I did, there's clearly an effort to co-op this growing awareness. as there always is, but that does not mean the effort is false. It can, but that doesn't verify, that, that is happening, doesn't therefore equate to that. You should be asking that question, but don't assume it.

Starting point is 02:48:02 In my experience, it usually means the opposite, though. Regardless, question everything, right? But I've done this a while, and what I tend to see is that when people start to, when you get this momentum after it's already kind of, I saw it with the yellow vests, I saw it with the, what was the other one? Oh, the massive worldwide response to pushing back against the genocide. Was it the genocide? It was the protest movement.

Starting point is 02:48:28 That's right. It was the genocide. But it was the movement they tried to call anti-Semitic and the protesting of Canada. That went worldwide. It just didn't get much attention. And so the point is, could that mean that it's some secret Democrat or whatever? Yes, it could. But the truth, when you look into it is that usually it's because somebody's trying to suppress

Starting point is 02:48:45 what is actual momentum with people that will. you know, the biggest worry to any power structure to any government is that the majority of people will stand against them. They probably have nightmares about that, especially today. And that is why they need to suppress any movement that is momentum. And that's whether we agree, like Operation Wall or Occupy Wall Street, for example. You may disagree with what they were trying to accomplish. You may think that it was politically moot. At the end of the day, it had momentum. And the only reason it failed is because you can look back and prove that the FBI basically led the movement to the ground. different positions in the front of the movement and basically turned it into a circus show.

Starting point is 02:49:22 And that's how this works with any of them. They try to downplay the reality of it for their own interests. So question it. I hope you do. I am. But also see that regardless of it, there are honest people in this that are doing it for the right reasons. Now, Dylan Ullman getting into the overlap with ice. There is an AI whose entire job is to read your medical file and tell armed men where you sleep.

Starting point is 02:49:47 It's called elite. stands for enhanced lead identification and targeting for enforcement. Here's the article from 404 Media. Elite, the Appalanteer app, ICE uses to find neighborhoods to raid. In 2025, I signed a deal with the agency that runs Medicaid and walked away with the records of nearly 80 million patients. ICE. Does that make sense, right?

Starting point is 02:50:11 Your name, your address, everyone who lives in your house, every line you wrote on the forum to get your kids seen at the local pediatrician. Then the AI pulls your health records, cross-references every other government file it can reach, and assembles a dossier with your name on it, then stamps a number on your home. A confidence score. How certain the machine is about where you sleep, printed as a percentage. Not whether you're an immigrant or not, everybody. This is a number that an agent reads before he comes to your door.

Starting point is 02:50:41 There is no way to separate the undocumented from everyone else in the data ice was given. You see, and this is the point, just like we just went over. the flock cameras, everything else. The argument is about the problem. But what they do to get to that is surveil everybody. Now, you could think that that's just them not caring about your rights. Maybe that's the case. I frankly think that's an excuse. The goal was to surveil everybody. The excuse was the immigrants because they know some people are motivated behind that. So they use that. They surveil everybody, including you who support them going after immigrants, and they continue to do it under the justification they need to to actually get the evil bad guys. So everyone is in it.

Starting point is 02:51:18 everyone. Every citizen who ever re-enrolled. And the AI's, and this, understand whether it's about the Medicaid point or the entire surveillance database for all the different angles, because include the flock camera thing we just went over, where everything you ping and everyone you connect to, gets labeled in database, you become a searchable database. You combine that with the medical side. You combine that with the, you know, I mean, what was the other one I was just talking about? You have the medical, you have the idea of like the, basically Palantir has taken over and as well as the kind of tech side of the whole thing, all of these different databases, that they've unsilode, jammed together for their machine learning for the AI point of it,

Starting point is 02:51:52 and then basically just turn this into a free-for-all. But the point becomes that they have access to all of this. And so now it becomes a master searchable database with all these different connected data points where they can then turn it into some kind of predictive program. That's what this is. Where was I? And it says, and the AI's targeting net is wide enough to catch a naturalized grandmother whose green card paperwork went cold 20 years ago.

Starting point is 02:52:18 one old form, one wrong zip code, one high elite score, and your address is sitting on the morning target list of a federal agent that shows up armed. Now, you may think, oh, good, get the illegal immigrant, which is not even what they're really talking about there. The point, though, is that this becomes a surveillable database for everybody. Now, even if right now it's only anti-demigrants, they can decide to do it. What if the Democrats become in power?

Starting point is 02:52:40 You think that's same, even though I'm doing that to appease those that think it's different. The truth is, it's the same government doing it for the same reasons. At the end of the day, whatever they decide. they move on to the next thing. What if it's just people who realize the government's supporting Israel instead of us? That becomes all of us, doesn't it? That's the point. The AI does precisely what it was built to do.

Starting point is 02:53:02 One old form, one old zip go, that's, I read that. It says what it's built to do tirelessly. At a scale, no secret police in history could have staffed with human beings. For a decade, they aimed your fear at the sky, at the artificial intelligence that might one day disobey. The AI reading 80 million medical files tonight obeys perfectly. That was always the one to be afraid of, flawless and sleeping, holding the leash for the men with the handcuffs. It's a good point.

Starting point is 02:53:29 Here's the article. Palantir is working on a tool for immigration, and this is from January, guys. So this is happening already. That populates a map with potential deportation targets, brings up a dossier on each person and provides a confidence score on the person's current address. Now, what do they already use that for? Do you remember? the idea that they might have an immigrant, well, they can kick your door down. They are, even though they do need a warrant and their weird ice warrant doesn't legally apply

Starting point is 02:53:55 because a judge already ruled that way, they don't care and they're still doing it. And so the point is they can just say, well, there might be a guy and burst in your door, even if a U.S. citizen and detain you. As it just happened, I just showed it the last show, a U.S. citizen, and they didn't care. Now, that has to matter to people, whether you're a Republican or Democrat, the idea, not some natural line, some green card, which it's the same difference, by the way, for you understand your rights.

Starting point is 02:54:19 But for them, it would matter. It was a U.S. citizen born in this country who has a right to their home. They kick in the door and are incorrect because of these broken systems. And they hold a U.S. citizen to the ground. They arrest the grant. They're Americans.

Starting point is 02:54:31 And it doesn't matter. Because apparently it's all about just, you know, rights don't matter when you don't like the brown people that might be a problem that maybe are illegally here. And that's what some people are actually doing. It has a fringe of even the real movement. The tool receives people's addresses from Department of Health and Human Services among the range of other sources, according to the material. Elite has already been used by ICE to target specific areas.

Starting point is 02:54:56 According to sworn testimony from an ICE officer in Oregon, in October, immigration officers waited in three unmarked SUVs outside an apartment complex in Woodburn. They went on to bust a driver's window, pull a 45-year-old woman from the van, used ICE's facial recognition. Ignition app mobile Fortify, also an Israeli tech app, on her, and agents had the goal of making eight arrests per team per day. A quota. Oregon live reported lawyers representing the woman say authorities arrested her more than 30 other people in a dragnet. They broke windows, they busted indoors when they don't even know who's guilty, guys, because they argue the AI said that was logical. Quote, the fact ICE is using this app proves the completely indiscriminate nature of the agency's aggressive and violent incursions into our communities, including the homes of American

Starting point is 02:55:49 citizens. This app allows ICE to find the closest person to arrest and disappear using government and commercial data with the help Palantir and Trump's Big Brother database. It makes a mockery of the idea that ICE is trying to make our community safer. Rather, agents are reportedly picking people to deport from a country the same way you'd choose a nearby coffee shop. In many cases, incorrectly is important to include. In their testimony, J.B. said, quote, it's a tool that we use that gives you a probability, but there's never, there's no such thing as 100%. As always, make sure you do your due diligence on each target to confirm. Okay, great. So tell that to the person's door you kicked in without due diligence. It's nice to say that

Starting point is 02:56:33 at all. Not 100% means you can't use that to arbitrarily arrest a woman and put her in jail for 13 days. That's what I say. You know, rights and all. They don't care. This has been used since January or well before. And to show you here, Mobile Fortify and Clearview AI, which we've talked about both extensively. DHS is using Israeli phone hacking software. That's what they're using. Guys, we have been infiltrated in every possible way around this. Even the government, it would seem. And this is how ICE knows who is there. All that information now accessible by a foreign power. Clearview AI, same point. Already has a program for facial recognition that they're also using for ICE and everything else. It's building the control grid around you guys. It's happening in real

Starting point is 02:57:16 time. David Beer pointing out a theme in ice shootings is putting their bodies in front of operational vehicles, right? So they step in front of a vehicle that might be already moving. This practice is dangerous for the officers and manufacturers of reason for them to shoot drivers if they make one wrong move. One witness says the victim said, I tried to stop. So you have literally, the guy was bleeding from his head on the ground. People are trying to help when he goes, I tried to stop. Like this is a person who they ultimately were lying about the first place, who then tried to move away who is not legally required to stop for some immigration enforcement. That's the point, guys.

Starting point is 02:57:51 And they just shoot them in the street. These are people being shot in the American streets every day because they're enforcing an illegal enforcement. That's what ICE is right now, what they are doing in every way, not identifying themselves, not giving warrants. Like, it's just like they don't even care, guys. Where are the actual Americans who care about the rights they're violating? Four green card holders, for people who have visas and for Americans,

Starting point is 02:58:13 all of which have the constitutional rights that are a four. to people who end up, I mean, like the point is from the original documentation, it was a declaration of independence for people. You could read it yourself if you care to remember. And the point was that within these boundaries are the only places these could be enforced at the time in the hopes that people would adopt them. The founding fathers made it clear that these things were not unique to people born here. But people are either done.

Starting point is 02:58:37 It's like the current government claiming it was founded as a Christian government. They see the exact opposite. These are dishonest, clumsy, maniacal people. And they're lying to you on top of that, or they're wrong and don't know it. The point is, guys, they'll lie to you every single day. And they're using this to enforce on you. Jesus freaking Congress, another example. ICE agents have shot and killed another person this is posted today.

Starting point is 02:59:00 This time in Maine, Bidford, Maine. Witnesses say they heard five to six gunshots before realizing someone have been killed. Right now, the public knows very little. And this ultimately has developed a little bit. The new video shows ICE running alongside the car. Video does not show the agent in danger being run over like they claimed. An agent shot and killed the driver. Witnesses say they heard four shots.

Starting point is 02:59:23 Basically, they had to follow the car and they shot him and the car could have run into anybody. And they had to get him after he stopped. So yet again, it seems the answer is they were not at risk and they killed the guy anyway because he wouldn't follow orders. This is where we are. If you support this, you are a monster. I don't care whether they're breaking laws or not. The idea is not supposed to be executing people in the streets and then openly lying about it because they wouldn't follow orders.

Starting point is 02:59:47 Over and over and over. Another one. Here's the latest version of the video of ICE killing Lorenzo in Houston. How did I shoot him in the abdomen on his right if he was shot while driving? It implies a downward bullet path, but his vehicle is higher than theirs. And guys, this has been coming out in one step at a time. Looking worse and worse, the victim's brother said the ICE agent approached from the passenger side of the car, struck stuck his hand in through the window and opened fire.

Starting point is 03:00:13 Now, it obviously could be lying. The point is that over and over, this is what keeps turning out to be the reality, that the guy was like driving away and they tried to shoot him as he's leaving. These are bad people. People they hire because they had an ideological motive and people that were barely trained

Starting point is 03:00:28 and did not, don't care, and are being shown every day that they have the legal right to get away with murder because the administration will back them. Here's just a small example, by the way. check this out. This just shows you where this is, the enforcement in this country. Son of a gun. Hold on. There we go. So the guy is standing here. They're enforcing on somebody else. The guy's on his knees. On his knees. Now watch what happens. Look at that. You know how insane that is?

Starting point is 03:01:02 That is a man who knows he won't be held accountable or believes he won't. The guy's literally on his knees. Has his hands in the air. And he says something the officer clearly doesn't like. And so he hits him with bear spray or whatever. is right in the face. And now, remember, this is the same thing that happened with Prattie. They sprayed him. He couldn't see what was happening. And so they tried to attack. How do you know what's going on at this point? This guy is blinded by this stuff. He can't see, or at least I've argued that's what's likely happening when you get directly in the eyes with whatever dangerous substance that is, probably given to Dubai, is real, half joking, and ultimately tackles him to the ground. And look, his hands are up. Like, okay, at this point right there,

Starting point is 03:01:45 wouldn't you be like, I mean, look, I don't, I'm not going to ask. anything to do it. Like the idea is the guy's standing there very docile. The idea that you need to take him to the ground is bad training. Now suddenly it's a whole thing. And the guy was doing what? Sitting on his knees talking. That's

Starting point is 03:02:07 the world we're in guys. And if you support that, I don't know what your problem is. You are somebody who believes in state power over the rights of people, period. Now, we're long today. Not that long, really, but I do want to talk about Iran. So let's go through this. But well, I'm sure we'll continue talking

Starting point is 03:02:24 about this. I'm not going to skip anything, but it's largely something we've already talked about a lot. So in regard to the assassination point, we talked about earlier, following rumors that Iran is attempting to assassinate President Trump, Trump has told military leaders that if he's assassinated, they should remove Iran from the face of the earth, which is just a childish thing to say. And it obviously means war crimes, obviously means killing innocent people, but they don't care. I, you know, whether you, oh, it's a tactic he's using to scare, whatever. I don't care. It doesn't matter. Why tactic? That's most of what he does. It's all still. wrong. It's all still not what would, it does not, how's the right way to say it?

Starting point is 03:03:02 Because I have a small opinion of the government in general, but from what people pretend we are, it undermines that respect in the world of it even exists anymore. The bottom line is he's saying, we'll do the bad thing we're not supposed to do. If you dare do the thing to me. He's a child. Trump's instinct for self-preservation is usually very strong, Glenn writes, but nothing could motivate Israel to want to assassinate him more than this statement. interesting way to let's i agree oh yeah you'll you'll wipe out iran we'll take him out quickly the point end of the day is i don't even think that's what would happen i honestly don't think that this moment the that's what would follow if that happened but who's to say the bottom line is i don't think

Starting point is 03:03:40 irons going to do that i don't think it's in their interest and i think they recognize all it would do is give them the motivation to do what they want to do not to say that they're not capable of it i think they would if it was in their interest i don't believe it's in their interest right now Wall Street Journal. Right. So the whole point was Israel said. Everyone sort of laughed about that as far as I could tell. Fears over a new luxury jet.

Starting point is 03:04:02 That was the point from the jet as well. Trump back to old Air Force One after Israeli warning, which was that Israel warned him, as it was all publicly relayed by everybody, that Iran's going to assassinate you. Well, U.S. officials received that Israeli intelligence about a possible plot. The threat was deemed not to be entirely credible,

Starting point is 03:04:21 according to some of those officials. Funny how that word. because they know Israel lies in their own interest every single second, right? I mean, it's not even remotely a hidden topic, guys. Let me preface these remarks with I never, never, ever believe Israeli figures. I've been in the government too long to know that the Israelis are patent liars. In their intelligence community, in their propaganda community, certainly. And in their leadership, they are inveterate liars.

Starting point is 03:04:54 Let me say that again. They are liars. Not that you need Wilkinson to tell you that. It's just, you know, they lied. And everybody knows that. Even the U.S. officials are like, you know, whatever. It's not probably accurate because they're just selling you on a narrative that gives Trump some kind of momentum that works for their agenda. Or maybe they were planning.

Starting point is 03:05:13 Maybe this was a threat to Trump. Maybe that's all these you should consider. It's just kind of silly, isn't it? Well, this was funny, by the way. This is what the page reloaded to. I'm so mad at myself, by the way. So I had this up. And not that it's that important,

Starting point is 03:05:29 but I ended up trying to refresh it and lost the page and I was mad. This is what this article said. That was hilarious. So the video itself was the video about Israel says Iran's going to kill Trump, right? Who knows how this happened? The title was Israel was plotting to kill Trump. Report says, I kind of don't think that was an accident. I think somebody on this platform with a team did that for, I don't know.

Starting point is 03:05:51 I get the sense that was meant to make a point. And then eventually, you read, I read the, comments. I checked it earlier before I went live and it was like, I was like, did you make a mistake? Well, look at the title. That's not what the video's about. And then of course, then right and they, they moved it. And you can even see right here, for those you can see about the podcast, but if you look closely, all right, it doesn't zoom in up there. But if you look at the URL, look what it says. Israel was plotting to kill Trump. You can see that they still have it in the, in the URL, but they just to remove the page because somebody caught wind, got wind of the fact that

Starting point is 03:06:25 they were, that's either somebody mistakenly did that or did it on purpose. My takeaway, everybody knows. Everybody knows. Now, another point on this and the infiltration part of this, this is interesting. So you might have seen this going around. It's being used by people that want to make Iran look like the bad guy. And, you know, that certainly maybe are. Every government should be criticized.

Starting point is 03:06:46 Every government's capable of these things. I'll say it every time. The point is, though, I do not believe Iran is what they currently frame them as. I don't. I think history shows you that. But Iran hangs man over alleged spying for Israel and intel agencies as executions mount. The point is this being bandied about is like, look, they're murdering people from our, well, guys, Israeli media literally reported this inside the Mossad plot to install this person as Iran's leader.

Starting point is 03:07:10 You know, come on. So you get to understand. Like, you understand what happened in the U.S. government. If somebody was caught like for treason for doing that at that high level, they would kill them. At the very least, they go to prison. So the idea that Iran would execute somebody into the same person, under treason. Literally a treason. You don't have to agree with it. I don't agree with the death penalty. The point, though, is that it is not different than what Israel will do, what the U.S. would do.

Starting point is 03:07:32 So let's have an even standard here. And I just love how even our own media is supposed to be, you know, advocating for U.S. interests will lie when the Israeli media will tell you what's actually going on. Pretty typical right now. And not all of it, but Harats has been doing that. Now, talking about what to finish, like what's happening going forward. So on the 10th, again, it's funny for those of you that have been following along with, this like since you know February forward you're not it's gonna be you're gonna laugh in the same way it's the same kind of cycle of stupidity is what it really is the Islamic Republic of Iran Trump posts on true social on July 10th Islamic Republic of Iran has asked us to continue talks we have

Starting point is 03:08:10 agreed to do so but the United States has stated to them in no uncertain terms ceasefires over we already kind of told you that it was on the 10th the last show well that's not what happened You know, and you can, like I said then, you can look now and prove to yourself that you know that didn't happen. So how embarrassing is that, guys? Like, you're such a small person that you have to pretend to be the one leading it. But again, we should question this too. I get the sense this is more the reality. Ghalibov says that the U.S., not Iran, was the one who asked about restarting negotiations,

Starting point is 03:08:43 which, by the way, seems it's exactly what's been happening. Because understand, they have still to this very moment, not. change except for we'll get to the point to where Iran is now saying the memorandum is now officially over because of Trump. They stood by the same points the entire time. I've said that every time. You can prove it for yourself every time. So in this case, it wouldn't surprise me that they're the ones continuing to want an end to this because they clearly have lost. They're clearly at the detriment. They're on their back foot. They are failing in all this. So we'll come back to that. Saeed Mirandi says, Mohammed Mirandi, ignore Trump and Axios. That's good advice right now since

Starting point is 03:09:18 they've been wrong like 40 times in a row. There will be no talks until Trump's regime follows through on its commitments. Okay, and he's not wrong. It's not taking sides. It's obvious. And I went over this in the last show, down the memorandum. They violated the Lebanon part. They violated the other part of part one in regard to threats.

Starting point is 03:09:37 Guys, they literally never met the memorandum from day one. But yet Iran still tried to make it happen. That's been pretty clear. The ship part, as everybody should know, if they're even remotely paying attention. As the memorandum said, Iran would have the ability to dictate the future of the straight. And I believe the way they said it was sort of like being, not in charge, but was it responsible for the operational safety. I think it was the way they framed that. That's very clear. Okay. And on top of that, the agreement was they would be with Oman control. Okay. So that was all stated

Starting point is 03:10:08 Trump signed it. And then Trump, as I think was by design to try to escape, kind of stave off the problem, try to slip boats through. And mostly, failed. But what kept happening was as Trump was using them, Iran was going, hey, you're violating the agreement, not the Trump, but the boat. The agreed route is right here. If you go that way, you'll be fired upon. Now, they didn't sink them as every time they fired them, turned them around, and they left, right? Unlike the U.S. who murders innocent people every single day with fishing boats or whatever, or bombs things they claim or something else every day. You know, the Yemenis will stop, the Israeli, you know, not kill anybody who just got to deter them with firing, but they'll

Starting point is 03:10:48 murder these ships and they're the terrorists, they're the pirates, right? Anyway, so he's right. They have never committed to it. And you could argue there are parts that Iran never did either. It wouldn't surprise me. But if you argue that from day one, the U.S. never even tried to comply with part one, why would Iran have done it in any say? Like in any point along the way, why would they have tried? Like in the beginning, I think they were. But if you can prove that from day one, Israel, or Israel, too, but the U.S. was not complying, then there's no point in which Iran was on the hook for needing to comply, if that makes sense. But they did anyway.

Starting point is 03:11:21 And the only ones I'm even pointing to is the possibility there were some polls with some that they were in agreement with. I can't prove it, but there's allegations. Or there's now an allegation that they started to rebuild something in their nuclear side of it. I can't verify it comes from CNN, but it's certainly possible and it wouldn't surprise me. It's not legally required for them not to. The memorandum, first of all, was just a suggestion.

Starting point is 03:11:40 It's not legally binding. But all that being said, I don't think they did it. I think it only started after it was clear that the U.S. was never going to comply with that's my opinion. I think it's backed up by what we've seen this entire time. So Trump comes out on the 10th and says the United States of America controls the straight, not Iran. Not true. Like literally laughably, obviously not true. Last month, I thought their Navy was destroyed on day one. You know, clearly he's a liar, guys. Last month, I directed our great U.S. military to execute a secret mission to support oil tankers

Starting point is 03:12:12 and other commercial ships. He's lying about this because you can prove it, GPS and all. Today, I'm pleased to announce the, well, of course, again, my point was you could turn these things off before. The reality, though, is that this is not real based on markets, based on any number of things. And I'll show you this in a second. Today, I'm pleased to announce that the effort has resulted in a hundred million barrel of oil making its way. Okay. A hundred million barrels, you would see an effect on things. The only thing he's really doing is leaving the reserves of the U.S. to affect the global market, which is hurting U.S. interests.

Starting point is 03:12:41 More than 200 commercial ships have safely traveled astray. Now, understand, some of those are because Iran has allowed them to. Not that may be what he's complaining there. This wildly successful effort, I love to tell he frames himself or gives himself titles. That's hilarious. Is because the United States controls the straight, not Iran. Okay. So how do you make that make sense right now, Trump, or the day before that?

Starting point is 03:13:04 Or the days when you said, you better not or we're going to bomb you. Well, they seemed like they were controlling it then. Just lazy. As Miranda says, the straight is closed. It will remain closed. Now, that was only like that on the 11th because of what the U.S. government did, which was bomb them, killing numerous people, 80 sites, I understand, it's reporting, because they were doing what they were supposed to do in the street.

Starting point is 03:13:26 That seems like a design, right, to make it look like Iran broke it, and hope they could just, the whole reality now is it seems Trump and Israel never intended to go through with this. They were trying to find a way around it. And then, again, Ghalyboff said, no, the U.S. came to us asking for negotiations, and we basically said no. That seems where it is right now. Now here's Barack Reveed on 12th. And every time Barack Reid comes out in this story, he's been wrong.

Starting point is 03:13:50 Every time. Over the last 24 hours, around 20 commercial vessels have transited through the straight. Okay? Well, Menchal Sint has been watching this using all sorts of different factors, and he obviously fake, he says. I agree. Not a single commercial vessel is confirmed to have transited through the U.S. controlled corridor in the past 24 hours, let alone 20.

Starting point is 03:14:07 So I'm pretty sure we can, you know, they're lying, guys. This is like Trump lied about 20 vessels in the very beginning of this. Do we remember that? We should. He's been lying about it the entire time. Barack Ravid, excuse me, Mario Nafal, same difference. Despite everything happening in the straight overnight,

Starting point is 03:14:24 he says, Iran firing on shipping, of course, without including that that was legally required because, you know, the whole thing, around 20 commercial vessels transit to the straight. So the point is, as Daniel writes, source, Barack Ravid. And he goes,

Starting point is 03:14:38 Mario Nafal in a nutshell, a megaphone for White House and Tel Aviv propaganda. He's right. just lazy repetition of what you're being told by the very established what you pretend you're fighting of course here is what trump said on cnn iran iran has declared the state of hormus closed is that true mr president it's open as far as we're concerned don't talk about it talk about the reason that you have to speak okay we appreciate your time sir i love that okay okay okay sorry about that that see if i didn't want that is because of what i had to do for those listening earlier i had to

Starting point is 03:15:15 in a different browser to be able to, who cares? I don't even get into it. So much weird stuff happens to this platform. You guys don't even know. It's just like wasting time to get into all the weird glitchy stuff that happens to me every 30 seconds of my life. Anyway, I have to have a second one open because I had to join it from a different window to be able to bring videos in. Just like that makes sense to anybody. Anyway, back to the point.

Starting point is 03:15:37 The idea that he just said, you know, first of all, it's open as far as we're concerned. Don't talk about it. Let's talk about this. And he goes, okay, let's move on. Western journalism. That's CNN, guys, the adversarial network of Trump. Don't talk about it. Donald Trump.

Starting point is 03:15:56 And this is the quote that came to mind. The party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and your ears. It was their final and most essential command. George Orwell, 1984. Don't talk about it. Like, okay, there's only two ways to take that. And he just said it reflexively, meaning like, shut up. Like, that's not the...

Starting point is 03:16:11 Or he's meaning, like, don't do it for Iran. Don't talk about that. let's talk about the good stuff and the media complies well at the point you're not journalism you're damn right we're going to talk the very thing you don't want to talk that's what we're going to focus on what what's going on there you that's journalism this is compliance from cnn the bottom line though guys it's not i mean it's not open as far as we're concerned it's so obvious these people are not in control and that's just pathetic like at this point i mean let's just need out this point for him to admit that he's been lying is insane at this point he's got to

Starting point is 03:16:46 keep doubling down. In the beginning, though, had they just come out and said, you know, like, I mean, just been real about it. You know, I mean, the point is he would suffer from this. He would lose politically. You see, but it's not in the cars of people like this, to be honest. The whole Roy Cohen point, you will lie to your deathbed because they're not honest, moral people with integrity. I mean, I don't know how else you can argue that guy. They're just willfully deceiving you because they'll be embarrassed if they don't. It's like the entirety of Afghanistan or Vietnam. They just literally allow Americans to suffer and die so they don't have to the ones to look bad. That's our country's history, guys, our government's history. Now,

Starting point is 03:17:25 another one, and there's a few of these. Trump on Iran. You obviously launched a fresh round of strikes overnight. Iran said overnight, the Strait of Ormoose is closed. Centcom came out this morning and said the Strait of Ramos is open. Which is it, Mr. President? And how are you going to respond? And I don't want to talk about it because I want to honor the life of Lindsay Graham, so I don't want to talk about it. I told you that before the call. Yeah. It's open.

Starting point is 03:17:55 We bombed the hell out of them last night. They're very, very evil and sick people. Oh, yeah. The very ones he just told you were good people he was dealing with, like 30 seconds ago. I just showed you last show. We had meetings with them for the last day. They agreed to a deal yesterday. No, they didn't.

Starting point is 03:18:12 Perfect deal for us. No nuclear, no this, know that. nothing. They gave up everything. Oh, yeah. Makes sense, right? Iran, who's clearly in control, gave up everything and then just lie. I mean, it's certainly possible that just to play him. They lied about that. That's possible. But I don't even see why that would make sense.

Starting point is 03:18:27 At this point, they just need to exist and watch these people swim in their own bullshit. Excuse me. Shouldn't have cussed. That just slipped in their own lies. And then after that, they left the room. And then within an hour, they launched a drone and their ship. I said,

Starting point is 03:18:44 You mean that ship that was going through the route illegally that you told them to so you could skirt by some oil and claim your winning or at least stave off your complete collapse, like the idea of the oil? I mean, this is only going to keep getting worse as your strategic reserve dwindles. So they're trying to sneak some by through a secondary route as best they can to give them a little bit more time is what it feels like. Right? So the idea that them firing on a ship that was going in the route, the wrong route, the wrong route. even though you signed a document that gave them the about this to be the ones of control of security you let you it's simple you knew they would do this and then you use that action to claim they started it so you find it shows you that they never wanted this to happen so trump was either guided

Starting point is 03:19:29 by israel or chose to do this to create the context to continue bombing them and you realize that's not going to stop anything as far as i can tell they that will only further entrenched Trump and the American people in this at the expense of us entirely. So Israel can gain. Tell me where I'm wrong. You're sick people. And so it's one of those things. I don't want to talk about it.

Starting point is 03:19:52 Finally before I let you go. I want to talk about one person today, Lindsay Graham. As we should, Mr. President, just finally before. It's a good person. Gross. It's the usual stupid rigum roll. You know, and oh, and this is the left media. Who loved Lucy Graham?

Starting point is 03:20:08 I thought they were adversarial. I thought they were the pedophiles who hated you guys. I was just so tired of how dumb and obvious it all is. So don't talk about it. Daniel says there's no possibility President Trump's claim is true. This is the latest evidence that either the president is in a serious cognitive decline or he is an incurable, a curable sociopathic liar, probably a little bit of both. Iran has been consistent, public, and emphatic about his positions.

Starting point is 03:20:35 True. And they have virtually remained unchanged throughout the entire conflict and the memorandum of period. That's not an opinion. That's not siding with anybody. You can prove this to yourself if you care. They are not going to relinquish control of the Strait of Formoose, and they are going to insist upon the conditions of the memorandum, be honored by America, primarily relief of sanctions and release of frozen assets. Until or unless those things are done, there is no chance they're going to give up everything, as Trump says. So why would they? As long as he is in the decision maker, is the decision maker about the war and peace, we seem locked in a conflict with no exit. You know, the three-day

Starting point is 03:21:09 He said it'll be over just like that. And they'd welcome us like heroes. We've been here before, haven't we? And therefore, the likely continued deterioration of our economic situation. Once a recession starts to deepen, one wonders if enough people will finally recognize that we have been lied to all along. Oh, and this, Daniel is, oops. Daniel is a veteran, somebody who,

Starting point is 03:21:30 and I think he has good insight on, you know, geopolitical, like, as someone who's been in those positions. So here's another clip, slightly different. Oh, actually, you know what? This one might, I thought this one, let me see. They're very perfect within an hour of things. I don't want to talk a person today, Lindsay Graham. As we should.

Starting point is 03:21:51 Yeah, that's the same clip. It was a Robert Barnes says he's making this up. It never happened. Problem is chances are high. He actually believes it. Crazy. There's two separate parts of this. And I thought this was interesting.

Starting point is 03:22:03 This is what I was thinking of. Mario Nafal plays this one. And you'll find it interesting what he cuts out. But Daniel says everything Trump says is a lie as usual. Everyone seems to see it who actually cares to see. And this is what the clip he shit, that Mario Knopfle shares of Trump. Same kind of point, right? And it's the one that the rapid response put out.

Starting point is 03:22:22 That's why he shares that one. And they broke it. They always break it. Right? Iran did it. And we just, that's the same clip. He went on every show and push that lie. Had a deal.

Starting point is 03:22:34 What nobody knows. We had a deal. it was a done deal and then they broke it they always break it we've had 10 deals with these people and so we're just going to hit him very hard and we're going to we're going to keep the it's possible that he thinks that right it's possible that he actually believes that they've had working deals that that ron is violated like i can see a world in which they keep him so insulated where he thinks everything's a democrat trick and everything's that or whatever he just blindly falls along the guy does seem to stupidly look at what laura has to say the guy does seem to have been influenced by some of the

Starting point is 03:23:05 dumbest people in the media sphere. So who knows? Either way, it's not, it doesn't really matter at the end point. He's either being fooled or he's lying to you. Either way, the core point is the same of what's actually happening. The straight and we'll probably run it. It will become the guardian of the straight.

Starting point is 03:23:23 Maybe you'll call it the guardian angel of the straight. I mean, guys, you have to laugh at this. Trump is like the guy who makes up his own nickname and then makes you call him that. Only a billionaire gets away with that. Oh, you're so cool, Trump. Oh, it's the best name ever. Everyone gushes over his name.

Starting point is 03:23:41 I mean, it's not even unique. It's not even an original title. But it's just because he wants to make himself, we're the ones in control. Calling yourselves the guardian, calling it the, you know, Gulf of America, it doesn't change the reality.

Starting point is 03:23:54 And it's not really what it's called. It's just bad politics. It's just lazy. It's just about trying to, you know, look, the end of the day, if you call yourself the guardian but aren't in control, you're a weak person. It's about trying to have some kind of narrative benefit over the outcome in hopes that might kick you over the edge or give you just enough time to trick people to thinking you got what you wanted or whatever it is because they're so clearly on their back foot here.

Starting point is 03:24:19 And we should be reimbursed for that. When we do that, we're going to be reimbursed because the other nations are very wealthy that are on our side. Yeah, not really, even the peoples, but you're talking about reimbursing you for you charging a toll. That's what he's talking about. How does that make sense? And we can't be expected to do that for nothing unlike we had for many years. You know, we guarded the straight for 50 years more, and we never got paid for. The guy just literally makes things up.

Starting point is 03:24:45 Kind of like Israel. You have cherry tomatoes, that's Israel. They made all the money in the United States was just, you know, not. They wouldn't, it's amazing. I don't even think he knows what he's talking about. What do you mean? In what way? What hasn't been monetized?

Starting point is 03:24:59 What are you talking about? Like, nope, that's not what's been going on. There has not. I think he might think somehow they've seized control of a system that was. in place. That's not what's going on here, Donald Trump. I mean, I was, I'm starting to wonder whether there is some level of cognitive. I mean, I think we know that he's an old guy that's got to play some factor. But what do you think? Does you think he's talking? I mean, he's insinuating. There was a lot of money around this in regard to some kind of a transit situation. That didn't exist before the

Starting point is 03:25:23 straight of hormones. Uh, we, we never made, we guarded it for nothing. And now we're going to guard it. We're going to get paid for guarding it. A lot of money. I mean, I guess his argument is somehow that the presence of U.S. military did anything other than, you know, I mean, it's an enforcement control thing. And there was tons of other ships that were in the same location from Iran, from Oman, from locations right around there. And yes, also the U.S. But of course, Trump's mind is we did everything because either he wants you to think that or he actually believes it, either which, either way, it's not true. But we just want to be reimbursed for doing all of this, for putting our people in danger.

Starting point is 03:26:00 But we're really... We want, we just want to be compensated for all that we do for everybody. You think that's ringing true with literally anybody? Not putting people. We're really saving people. Remember this. They killed 52,000 protesters. And we're right back there.

Starting point is 03:26:14 Remember, they killed this number that went up every 30 seconds I've mentioned it, but they did it. Nobody believes that other than people, Zionists. I mean, the reality is not saying that as a, like, the evidence isn't there. The only kind of person that blindly repeats numbers like that without ever having that proven is somebody politically motivated involved with an agenda. or, you know, I guess the first one applies to a lot of different things. For whatever political reasons, choose to go forward with something you've never verified, like Laurel Lumer.

Starting point is 03:26:40 So far, as of this moment, the number is 52,000. So who's going to protest? And a lot of people are surprised about the protesting that, you know, that they haven't. But nobody's going to protest when they... You mean like the billions of people that seem to be, you know, the very, very large grouping of people that came out in support of the person that you assassinated? again, it's not that difficult if you care to look beyond the narratives in this broken country or the broken government and the media's apparatus that protects it. If you actually listen to people,

Starting point is 03:27:08 most people in Iran were not okay with that. Most people support what they're doing in regard to the, like the process. And I don't mean that they support the government. They very clearly have reasons to be upset with them in some portions of the populace. But they support the process, as Robert has covered the entire time. They do not want U.S. Israel stepping in, saving them. That's the fake Shaw dynamic. Those are the people that support an authoritarian dictatorship where they'll benefit from it, framing it as a democracy.

Starting point is 03:27:39 Even Twitter, as I pointed out long before seeing people recognized it like last week that they were using the Shaw flag a long time ago. That was Elon Musk's decision to change that flag long before we got here. They get shot. They have AK-47. They have machine guns aimed at people's heads. If you move one foot further, you get shot. And then they'll shot.

Starting point is 03:27:59 Like in Israel? You mean like in Saudi Arabia? You mean like in most of the country you support? That's not, I mean, you know, it's not even, look, even if that was true. And it's not reality is based as far as everybody I've ever known that's been and traveled through and done. Yes, there's plenty of examples of the same kind of enforcement. Guys, we've got military marching to the streets of this country.

Starting point is 03:28:18 There's time to have a little bit of, you know, reflection on the reality of this as he's pointing fingers everywhere in most cases, either exaggerating or making stuff up. I shoot 10 of them and everybody flees. Who's not going to flee? They don't have a gun. What are you talking about? So they're a bad group. The idea of a shooting, which sounds like it happened in Gaza, quite frankly, but it doesn't matter.

Starting point is 03:28:40 I'm not suggesting Iran's not capable. In fact, I can show you examples of their government suppressing people just like every government. But what he keeps doing is false. And if you can't acknowledge that by now, you're just not paying attention. For people, let me just tell you that. I don't say that often. And I have to live with that statement. They're a bad group of people.

Starting point is 03:28:56 They've been this way for a long. time and right now they're getting their ass kicked. That's the end note, right? We're winning, so shut up. Not true. Nobody believes that. But here's the next point, which I find very relevant. So that's what Mario shares, right?

Starting point is 03:29:13 Well, here's the same interview. McWallis, a little bit more has to do with the fact that what we're going to do is make a lot of money. Funny that that's what the White House and funny why they would cut that out, don't you think? I'm going to keep the straight and we'll probably run it will become the guardian of the strait. Maybe you'll call it the guardian angel of the straight. And we should be reimbursed for that. When we do that, we're going to be reimbursed because the other nations are very wealthy. They're on our side. And we can't be expected

Starting point is 03:29:40 to do that for nothing, unlike we had for many years. You know, we guarded the strait for 50 years more and we never got paid for it. They made all the money. I frankly think that crisis initiation is really tough. And it's very hard for me to see how the United States States president can get us to war with Iran, which leads me to conclude that if, in fact, compromise is not coming, that the traditional way of America gets to war is what would be best for U.S. interests. Some people might think that Mr. Roosevelt wanted to get us into World War II, as David mentioned. You may recall we had to wait for Pearl Harbor.

Starting point is 03:30:23 Some people might think Mr. Wilson wanted to get us into World War I. You may recall he had to wait for the Lusitania episode. Some people might think that Mr. Johnson wanted to send troops to Vietnam. You may recall we had to wait for the Gulf of Tonkin episode. We didn't go to war with Spain until the U.S.S. until the Maine exploded. And may I point out that Mr. Lincoln did not feel he could call out the Federal Army until Fort Sumter was attacked, which is why he ordered the commander at Fort Sumter to do exactly that thing, which the South Carolinians had said would cause an attack.

Starting point is 03:30:54 So if, in fact, the Iranians aren't going to compromise, it would be best if somebody else started the war. But I would just like to suggest that one can combine other means of pressure with sanctions. I mentioned that explosion on August 17th. We could step up the pressure. I mean, look, people, irredient submarines periodically go down. Someday one of them might not come up. Who would know why? We can do a variety of things if we wish to increase the pressure.

Starting point is 03:31:29 I'm not advocating that, but I'm just suggesting that this is not an either-or proposition. You know, it's just sanctions has to succeed or other things. We are in the game of using covert means against the Iranians. We could get nastier at that. Sorry about that, guys. I'm going to have to wrap this up quicker than I expect. I don't know, you might have heard a second ago. You could hear my pup chewing our nails over here.

Starting point is 03:32:08 some sound in there, but she's getting antsy, so we're going to have to wrap this up. So as my sidekick here dictates the time in the studio. So let's try to wrap this up reasonably quickly. I read through some of these. The point is I want to get to where we currently are. But I do want to read these statements really quickly. And so Brett Erickson says there is simply no justification for the United States pushing through vessels along the Omani Coastline in the Strait of Hermose.

Starting point is 03:32:32 You can cry and scream about freedom of navigation, but at the end of the day, the memorandum of understanding was very clear that Iran would control. this traffic through the straight of Fremuse during the initial 60-day window. Time and time again, the United States, and I just showed you that, time and time again, the United States has shredded the MOU by attempting to retroactively alter the terms because they didn't like them. Of course you didn't like them. They suck because you lost.

Starting point is 03:32:55 Oil sanction waivers a la Article 10, torched. New sanctions a la Article 9, blown up. Iranian administration of traffic a la Article 5. Nope. You can whine all day long about how it's wrong for Iran to strike. those vessels, but this is a rational response to a war of choice from the United States. You don't get to claim right versus wrong. Then the Trump administration is, when the Trump administration is solely to blame for the

Starting point is 03:33:19 situation in the first place. The Strait of Pramuse was open before this war started. The reason that the United States was attempting Operation Freedom 2.0, along with Omani Rescue, was because they were trying to actively undermine the Iranian control of the strait. They were trying to actively push through enough vessels in a short period time to shift the strategic landscape of the conflict. I have seen time and time again people claim Iran doesn't know what's best for them. If they just didn't strike vessels, they would get massive sanctions relief.

Starting point is 03:33:47 No, they wouldn't because Trump, President Trump and the United States had no intention of sticking the MOU. I happen to agree. The goal was to use the 60-day window to shift the landscape so that they could topple the regime or secure outcomes they could not have in the initial MOU. This isn't the U.S. operating in good faith. And those pesky Iranians messed everything up as Trump I'msily keep saying. This is the United States blatantly trying to unilaterally alter the terms of the MOU by shredding the oil waivers, sanctioning new entities, and pushing through vessels through the Omani route.

Starting point is 03:34:18 And if you, look, if you question this, because it's historically what they've done almost every time. Israel, especially, but the U.S. in a very bombastic way. But Yemen with, I mean, you go down the list. They violate everything from UN saying UN mandates and UN resolutions to their own agreements, you know, go back to Gorbache. You go to every single thing. The lines they draw, they will violate everything.

Starting point is 03:34:43 And so in this case, you don't need to be sold on this if you understand history. Now, not that the person, you know, whether he writes for Mainstein platform, like, it's the truth. It's what the evidence backs up. Now, question whether this person has good intention or not. Doesn't change the fact that the evidence is true. Here's what he writes here. It seems increasingly likely the United States is going to wage a completely unhinged economic

Starting point is 03:35:04 warfare campaign against Iran in the country. days, which will include the bombing of economic and civilian infrastructure, which they just did, lasting effects of the population. Israel was arguably responsible, at least in one of those bombings. A blockade of Iranian ports, they just did, meant to cut off access to wheat, medical supplies, cooking oil, which they've always done with Iran, with Syria, with Gaza, what they do. It's easy to prove, verify. Three, major sanctions on effectively every area of the Iranian economy, which will affect the people.

Starting point is 03:35:34 for bombing of roads, bridges, and realites also happening. Devastating the Iranian people will not achieve victory. The United States has proven to the civilians that they are the great Satan by our action throughout this war, meaning whatever the Iranian government is called the U.S. government is clear by their actions. The Iranian people recognize what they really are. Shocking to see they all support them all of a sudden. And really did, but just maybe did support, like there was division about the government, but as I've seen roundly, the people when it comes to it don't support any outside action.

Starting point is 03:36:04 Like Americans wouldn't. Americans very clearly have problems with their government. I don't think any American wants a foreign power to come help them figure it out. You see how easy it has to understand? Devastating the Iranian people won't achieve victory. You cannot claim to care about the Iranian people and then willingly choose to incur immense suffering upon them with no likelihood of toppling the regime.

Starting point is 03:36:23 That's for Israel, guys. Now, Hormuz letter, a water pumping station in southwest Iran was struck by U.S. airstrikes, killing one, injuring four, per the local government. the U.S. has now struck bronze, oil, gas, petrochemical, water infrastructure in tonight's attacks on the 12th. All massive war crimes. There is literally nothing, nothing that can make that line up with anything other than the war crime. You're talking about bombing civilian infrastructure that it's not even housing. It's not about, you know, they were using it as you, it's a infrastructure. It's a

Starting point is 03:36:53 infrastructure. They're talking about water infrastructure. Bridges. They're just bombing them because Trump told you he would. He says, we have gone way too far. What he means is the U.S. government, not the American people. At least that's what I mean. If Iran takes it to the level 10, this is on Trump. 100%. Absolute psychopaths surrounded by psychopaths. So you can argue on Israel and Trump,

Starting point is 03:37:13 but from an American perspective, guys, he has brought whatever happens on himself. Now, I hope to God, that does not go to some level like I think it might. US launches more strikes on Iran as the standoff of a straight of Hormuz escalates. This is on the 12th. Now, just in general, you know,

Starting point is 03:37:30 the point is they continue to strike back and forth. we can go in a little more detail, but let's get to today. Still on the 12th, three U.S. soldiers killed on strikes in Kuwait, which they'll probably deny until they show up in some helicopter crash in three months. Massive black smoke rises after American, what is it again? A-TACMs, a missile system hit by three ballistic missiles. Kuwait confirms material damage. Now, on top of that, on Washington Post article comes out,

Starting point is 03:37:58 survivors of Iranian attack that killed six U.S. troops say generals ignored warning. warnings. Interesting. It says if we don't learn from the mistakes, if we just all believe the same lie, then it'll happen to another unit later on and they'll end up in the same situation we were in, said Major Stephen Rams Bottom. That's a crazy name. Who was in the building when it hit? So the quick story in this guys, as he as actually has combat wrote, U.S. Brigadier General Clint Barnes abandoned his troop. This is what, this is what people in the of the, of the other military said. Abandoned his troops

Starting point is 03:38:37 during an Iranian drone attack in Kuwait. Fleeing to a bunker while dozens of other trapped soldiers were in a burning building. Six U.S. soldiers died, three wounded. Now, I don't know what you want to take from this. Whether you think this is the kind of guy,

Starting point is 03:38:51 like what's become of our government and our military because of things like Trump and Israel, or I don't know what you want to take this as. Bottom line, this general abandoned his people and ran into a bunker according to your reporting and according to other military. and, you know, they lied about people being killed. I mean, if you think for one second, this government cares about you, our people, our

Starting point is 03:39:12 our constitution, our society, our larger values, every day they show you, they don't. Every day. Daniel, again, says, Daniel Davis, Deep Drive says, I can no longer say I suffered from shock, but I am deeply disappointed, if not angered by the continuing humiliation of the senior flag officer corps in the United States Army or America, in the United States of America. in the United States of America as now General McKenzie humiliates himself

Starting point is 03:39:37 with this absurd suggestion about Carg Island. Basically saying the U.S. should consider seizing that island because possession of Iranian soil would be a significant factor in future negotiations.

Starting point is 03:39:48 So just, you know, I don't know. These people are the enemy or rather are the villains of the story, right? Like, in the sense of them, I do argue what they're doing is the enemy

Starting point is 03:39:59 of the American people's objectives. But either way, what I meant to say in this context was this is the bad guy, if you want to look at that binary. You're talking about the person who's driving this country, the government, the military, Americans to fight a losing war and to do something illegal within that war for what end? And this is as what he's writing here is this person knows better.

Starting point is 03:40:19 He knows that even if the possession is even maintained, that it has no bearing of control on the Strait of Vermeuss. And wonders of the generals even aware of that. Oh, he could be wrong too. I think this is about them being put out there to make these statements. frankly. Now, on top of that, it hasn't happened as far as I can tell. It might have happened over the last couple hours. But this was saying U.S. has directly struck Karg Island. Treatta Parsi says major escalation, but as I can find too, this is actually, I think there's actually

Starting point is 03:40:49 a picture of it down here too. It's tanker trackers, same thing. Apparently what they're arguing is not. It's incorrect. They call it it's regular gas flaring. So they already tried to do this about something else that was happening. And it turned out they were correct. That, like, taker tracker said, nope, the U.S. government's lying. It's actually something that happens every month, and they were right. And so yet again, you got people who are using this. Major attack! And I think he just, who knows what his intentions were, thought it was happening.

Starting point is 03:41:14 And Brett says, nope, they both disputed its oil flaring, not strikes. And as best I can tell, that's the reality. So who knows why? Robert Barnes, highlighting what Monarch says, U.S. President Trump, he said, in a recent interview discussion, everything in Iran belongs to America. oil, gold, food, gas, we're going to take it all. You know, that's what, you know, because that's the legal reality of our Constitution.

Starting point is 03:41:37 Nope, that's what pirates say, guys. That's what criminals do. We're taking everything because we can. Does it sound like American values? What we pretend this country represents, even if it doesn't? No, it does not. It is exactly what they pretend their enemies are like. Right?

Starting point is 03:41:53 Yes. And so as Robert Barnes says, he's nuts. He's been nuts for a while now. Lastly, to finish on where we currently are today, Iran has formally announced, and who knows if it holds, they pulled it back last time they did this, but they announced there would draw for the memorandum. Now, that last time it was more so that we weren't talking and were done, but then we went back to talking, which reached the memorandum, and now they're saying the memorandum is done. The war is obviously resumed, but it resumed before that when they were still pretending the memorandum was working. Meanwhile, and this I think is very relevant. Yemen says Saudi strikes. on their airport constitute declaration of war.

Starting point is 03:42:30 Saudi Arabia, clearly through the behest of the U.S. and Israel, in my opinion, have initiated or reinitiated the ongoing war of aggression against Yemen so they can control the Babel Mandat and Strait. I'm telling you, that's what this is about. I've been saying that for years and it's clearly relevant and it's always come down to Iran and the Strait of Vermeus. Suddenly, as they're losing this control, they do this. Clearly, guys, they need a secondary route and they've always been able, it's always been

Starting point is 03:42:54 up in the air because of Yemen. controlling that street. And that's important. What did Yemen demonstrate already? That they're not going to sit back. So that's important, I think. But the memorandum is now officially dead according to Iran. AP, live updates, Trump says,

Starting point is 03:43:14 U.S. blockade of Iran, and that he will be charging ships for passage. I mean, it's just like they don't, who is advising this person? Like, I get the sense they surrounded himself with so many yes men, because that's what this whole thing is, that nobody, they go,

Starting point is 03:43:29 Yeah, great idea, Trump. That's the best thing. Best truth, ever war. Best thing you could have ever said. Everything's great. I mean, how else do you explain this? Who is around him going, yes, do that really dumb thing that will definitely hurt your... I don't get it.

Starting point is 03:43:42 Or is he ignoring everything? I don't know. It's insane to go, oh, now we're going to put a toll. You know why that's insane? Oh, I actually think I have the post. But I mentioned made the point here. Iran must not charge tolls. As Rubio, Trump, everybody said, why?

Starting point is 03:44:01 It's an international waterway. A toll would be illegal. Of course, I came out and made it clear, no, it's not true. And I guarantee that's what their argument becomes, which shows you even more how completely dishonest they are, which was that it's not international waterway. And you can prove that. The spot right there where they're going to do it is clearly Omani waters and Iranian waters.

Starting point is 03:44:20 There is no, there's a space where there is no international water. So now, even though they just said they can't, it's illegal. Trump comes out and goes, we're going to charge a straight. We're going to charge a toll. U.S. military began another round of strikes on Monday. That is today. They are striking yet again. Donald said he will charge other ships for safe passage.

Starting point is 03:44:40 And he just said, but we're going to be reimbursed for it. That's probably what he meant. So he's going to frame this as some kind of logical reimbursement, not like Iran's doing it. And he's talking about a huge increase. So back to bombing. The memorandum's over, according to Iran. Trump is now doing the blockade, which affects everybody. even though he's aiming it only Iran, it definitely affects everybody,

Starting point is 03:45:02 especially since he is now, I guess, extorting everybody for money. Because you understand what Iran was doing was not that. Even though if you want to frame it that way, I'm sure people will. The point is it was a signed agreement amongst Oman, Iran, and everybody involved with the memorandum that they would set up this waterway passage and secure that safety. It was all documented. So for Trump to come around and bomb them, lie about it,

Starting point is 03:45:24 and then pretend he's going to do it, that's just great extortion, especially for how much he's framing it as. He has no legal right to be involved in this. It's not his territory of waters, as rather as the U.S. government does not. So Trump says, the Strait of Removes is open. Well, not according to everything you can see improved right now. And we'll remain open, incorrect, without, with or without Iran. We are reinstating the Iranian blockade.

Starting point is 03:45:47 Okay. I mean, clearly that didn't make it much of an effect at all. And it's definitely having an effect in some ways on the people of Iran. The Iranian government has clearly set their feet in for the long haul here, guys. They've been planning for this. Why? because they knew it was coming. As evidenced by the fact they went to the UN

Starting point is 03:46:02 before they struck them in February and said, look, they're going to bomb us. And if they do, we're going to bomb back on these areas. Documented. And then when they did, they called terrorists. They bombed all these countries. Well, why'd they go to the UN then and say they were going to? Because they knew they had a legal right to, guys.

Starting point is 03:46:16 It's not that hard. So reinstating the blockade means they're going to put back what they were doing, which Iran has planned for for years, decades even, if you understand how long it's been threatened. So named because it's the only stopping Iran, ships and customers from entering or leaving, which has been proven to be false, by the way. Maybe it will be now. Even though they said it last time, Trump was very clearly stopping other ships that were even

Starting point is 03:46:37 related to Iran. It wasn't just Iran or even ships that were going to Iran. It was just people that were tangentially connected. That's not what he said. All other countries will have fair and open use of the strait. Okay. The U.S. will be from this point forward known as the guardian of the strait. So he clearly either wrote that and said it or set it out.

Starting point is 03:46:58 loud and liked it and repeated it. Again, he's the guy who makes up his own nickname and then makes you say it. That's embarrassing. But as such, and as the matter of fairness, it will be reimbursed at a rate of 20% on all cargo. All. Yeah, it's, I mean, you notice how he didn't say open and free. Fair and open and will charge 20% of your entire shipping. I don't even think that's like sustainably possible. These people have all got, you know, bottom lines and you, you you suddenly carve off 20% huge. That's just insane, guys. That is a level of insanity. Like, I think it might be even a troll if you want my honest opinion, because I don't even know how that's, again, or he's just losing it. For any and all costs necessary for doing the job of

Starting point is 03:47:43 providing safety, you are the very element causing uncertainty, and everyone's becoming aware of that. Okay. So that's what he said. So Trump's new, new plan is to do exactly what he says. He's been trying to stop Iran from doing? Right. Okay. Even though it's what the memorandum he signed allowed him to do? Yeah, the answer is yes.

Starting point is 03:48:07 Is it that he has no plan or just that he's not actually in control? I mean, I don't know. If the former, who's advising? And as I said, who is actually standing there going, this is the right move, Trump? I don't know. Hegg Seth, Cash Patel, that would make sense.

Starting point is 03:48:21 I don't know. This is just kind of crazy to me. Because, again, whether it's the fact that he's saying it's illegal one day and then doing it himself, or the fact that the entire point was stopping this arbitrary block and then doing it and charging it. You just, you got to laugh at that. You got to laugh.

Starting point is 03:48:37 And this person says, delusional old man, two, one to two weeks, he'll post, open the heaven straight. You bag every time, right? Open the straight. We don't need the straight. We're taking the straight. Everybody notices this is how silly it does. Saeed Argosi from the informant of Iran says, Potus, Trump is absolutely right. whoever provides secure and safe passage of commercial vessels through the Strait of Ramos,

Starting point is 03:49:00 should be compensated for the service. Iran has always been the guardian of the Strait, did that on purpose, and will remain so forever. 20% of course is too much. We will be fair. See, like even that was very tactfully done and will hurt them. 1.5 million views because you're going to go, wait, 20%, they're saying 2%. What? What? Why would we think you're the good guy this equation, Donald Trump? I mean, because they're doing the only world in which is bad is if Iran is just thieving monster or terrorist. It's not the truth. Evidence by everything they do every single day. And I don't mean that. It doesn't mean to do bad things. I mean, it means that what they're doing in this agenda shows you they're not what they're framed as. They're still a government. I argue if push to an extreme position would do pretty much anything else any government would do. Now, oil prices have shot back up. Surprise, surprise. Here he is on the sixth going oil prices are coming down.

Starting point is 03:49:53 and that wasn't even true, by the way. It was still never down from where he started before the war. Breaking, U.S. oil prices spike 9% of Trump announces the reinstating of the blockade. Right, exactly. Catherine Tyson, Kathleen, excuse me, war between Yemenis and Saudis probably closes Bob and Neps straight. And it hits the cross-peninsula pipeline that kept oil flowing to the EU. Now, it could very well be that this is all by design to get this to happen

Starting point is 03:50:21 so that it hurts the EU, so he forces them. to take his side. But who's to say that's what's going to happen? But either way, it could just be them stepping in it like usual. If the reinitiation with Yemen is only going to spin out to hurt them more. That's my opinion. And if they choose to, they could definitely shut down the bottom and I think that would be a kind of a checkmate in a larger sense of what they could accomplish. And that would either lead to massive bombing, potentially nuclear, nuclear or stepping back. or in a never-ending kind of conflict zone, which they'll largely grow to benefit from,

Starting point is 03:50:55 because that's what war seems to do, the peripheral government, right? Government tend to lose, has been prolonged war. But the industry around them, which becomes sort of the government of themselves, they wildly profit. And that's what runs this country.

Starting point is 03:51:07 Douglas McGregor, on the 12th, says Russian TU214PU, also known as the nation's doomsday plane, headed to Tehran. Now, I've seen him been, wrong in this kind of where he just states it with nothing to back it up. He is a general, you know, for whatever, for military personnel.

Starting point is 03:51:29 And my point, though, is that he has said a lot of the stuff that's been mostly correct. So the reporting is, as Douglas McGregor argues, that he believes this is happening. And historically, he's been mostly correct about this stuff. And I argue the ones that he's been wrong about probably just went the different direction. But he has agenda. I mean, he clearly is politically motivated. So question everybody, myself included. Point, though, if he's correct.

Starting point is 03:51:50 The doomsday plane heading Tehran from Russia says a lot. And what it means to me is that with this new position, this has gone, you know, if the U.S. and Israel drive it beyond like this point, it's going to become, it already is global, but it'll, like it requires action because it will only grow to affect everybody. And so Russia is, at least arguably by this move, taking Iran side, which is what I would expect. Rubio, of course, embarrassingly, in March, the goal of the war is to change the regime. And then that's why Trump tries to lie about changing the regime. They did not. In April, Rubio, goal of the war is to stop Iran from making nukes. They never were.

Starting point is 03:52:29 Rubio in July, goal of the war is to return everything back to the way it was, including the straight. America and have elected bunch of clowns, if they were even elected in the first place. Morandi says, to be blunt, Trump has fallen into a trap. The straight is closed. Interesting. Now, he could be saying that just to get, I want to see if this image was. That's just funny. Podcast, you'll have to check it out. Look at the show. It's a picture.

Starting point is 03:52:56 It's like a graphic of Trump. It's funny. Anyway, so I do agree that, I mean, or rather, I mean, the point is that the suggestion is that Trump in all of this has taken the bait of whatever they were setting up. That could be a tactic in and of itself. But I guess we'll find out. And so I think, you know, you can see that Iran has been kind of dictating these choices. I don't know why they wouldn't have set this up in some way.

Starting point is 03:53:24 So we'll have to find out. Of course, as I said earlier, Central Command reporting today. They have now begun launching a third consecutive night of strikes against Iran, so clearly Trump is going to push this. The strikes will continue imposing a heavy cost of Iranian forces. They say and degrade their ability to attack. Well, I thought you keep saying they don't have any ability to attack.

Starting point is 03:53:43 That's embarrassing for you, Trump. And their ability to attack innocent civilians, which that's not happening anywhere. I mean, literally anywhere. You understand they could have been bombing in tons of areas, and they're not. commercial shipping straight of Hermose, which all of was only because they were taking the wrong route. So Central Commandant, just lying for the third of the agenda. But they are still bombing.

Starting point is 03:54:06 Lastly, Lebanon, which by the way is the main point of why they were never following through with the memorandum because Israel was told by Trump, according to their media, that they never had to listen. What does that tell you? So they kept murdering people in Lebanon, which is still happening. And I just think this is so insane like the point from the beginning. This is from the 12th. Israeli defense minister, Katz, says, I said that southern Lebanon would become Gaza. And he did. And we told you that then. It was disregarded by the power structures. He said, we would apply the Rafa model. We just showed you the flattened Rafa.

Starting point is 03:54:42 We would destroy everything there. We would deal with them in exactly that way, meaning genocide. And that is what we did, he said. And this is where it gets even crazier for those trying to still pretend like he doesn't mean what he's saying. the infrastructure has been destroyed homes in 24 villages along the border villages that existed for hundreds of years and were used by hesbola as military outposts against Israel have been demolished he's me he means entire cities entire count you know little villages of people like homes guys just because they go hesboa bad guy that hesville by the way is not even entirely military in fact there's it's there's a military arm but there's everything else it is a society thing. And Robert has covered this intensively. So just like with Hamas, same idea. You have people

Starting point is 03:55:28 that are riding in ambulances, people that work at stores. And the idea is because they live there, well, they're all terrorists because that's what they want you to think. And it's simply showing you, we've murdered innocent people, we've bombed infrastructure, we told you we're going to do it in Gaza, we told you we're going to do it in Lebanon. They all know this. The army systematically flattened the villages, bulldozers and explosives. 90% of houses are gone. Between 15,000, 20,000 homes have been destroyed. He's just bragging about this on a public podcast, literally outlining the genocide model. Still, some still pretend isn't even happening. The truth is we all see it because we're not morons. The other truth is that those in power are sociopaths or corrupted. I mean, how else does one

Starting point is 03:56:11 explain that it carries on as he openly brags about it? Here's Smotrich. My son wants me to leave some Lebanon for him to destroy later. I told them, don't worry, there will be enough for everyone. Literally what it says, guys, please verify it for yourself. This is Israeli media. That's Smotrich, knowing nobody's going to stop him. At least he believes that. Openly talking about just, we'll murder them later, guys.

Starting point is 03:56:40 These people are dark, evil people. Men Press News, Donald Trump will be deploying U.S. forces to Beirut to aid the fight against Hezbollah. What was that about never-ending wars, Trump? What about no more war, no more spending foreign engagement for America first? Yeah, he never meant any of that, guys. At Israel's behest, Americans will be sent to participate in another war for Israel. Initially, under the guise of helping the Lebanese army disarm Hezbollah, that's just the, that's the war, guys, that's what they're doing.

Starting point is 03:57:12 They're working with them to go after what is the guiding force, fighting for the people in Lebanon. That's Hezbollah. This was just revealed by the financial. times. That's where we are. Heck Seth. Iran made a poor choice. Now they pay. As Caitlin Johnstone points out, these guys built a whole political

Starting point is 03:57:32 platform out of no more endless wars. And then immediately changed the Defense Department to the Department of War and started launching endless wars. You got to laugh. You know, you got to laugh, how stupid it is. If you can't, you know, better to laugh than cry. I mean, you shouldn't be surprised by this if you've been paying attention.

Starting point is 03:57:51 Americans are doing the bidding of something other than your interest, guys. It's simple. Lastly, Jolani, you know, the Al-Qaeda guy, that guy that they totally knew was a terrorist because they put on a $10 million bounty on his head. Even though even at that time, I think it's pretty clear that they were also funding and supporting him. That's why he still does it today. The narrative was they were ever fighting him.

Starting point is 03:58:14 You understand? But the point is, this is a U.S. government account that they've now taken down. Rewards for justice. Mohamed Al-Jolani, $10 million reward. Okay, that's him right there. Speaking with CIA director David Petraeus, saying he's a big fan of former Al Qaeda headchopper, now Syrian president.

Starting point is 03:58:35 The U.S. in the name of the war on Al Qaeda, spent trillions of dollars on multiple wars, killed billions, lost thousands of soldiers, and dismantled American civil liberties, due process, and privacy rights. Now, one of the top generals who oversaw that war, who stole top secret information to help his mistress write a book proclaims himself a fan of a top-level al-Qaeda commando

Starting point is 03:58:59 on whose head the DOJ had a $10 million bounty. And by the way, the bounty carried over while he was president. It took months for them to actually remove the bounty, even as he had become president of Syria, worrying if he's getting enough sleep and time for contemplated thought. The word terrorism is a massive fraud. On top of that, here's Marco Rubio. Today, Poet has informed Congress, and this is on the 8th, of his intent to rescind Syria's

Starting point is 03:59:28 designation as a state sponsor of terrorism. Right. Now that the terrorists control it, now we can stop calling them terrorists. But while they were people that actually didn't fight for terrorism and actually fought for the people and enriched themselves too, we couldn't have that. It can only be one direction. It can be at the expense of everybody for American government interest. And if we don't have that, then you're a terrorist.

Starting point is 03:59:48 Now, we don't care if you are terrorists. If you do what we want, you'll be the good guy. Just ask anybody else who normalized with this, we're going to got taken out the list, regardless of changing what they did. This historic step opens a new possibility for economic opportunity. Yeah, all the things you were willfully withholding for Syria for decade because you didn't want Assad in power.

Starting point is 04:00:07 Literally, wanting to, the reconstruction funds and all this stuff, which they held back because they didn't want that person in power. Now that the Al-Qaeda leaders in power, now they'll give them all the money that came from your tax dollars. Anybody confused? As Scott Horton points out, America first. No, dummy. Israel instead.

Starting point is 04:00:23 And here's Trump. Sitting there having a casual conversation with the leader of Al-Qaeda. Now that the U.S. has put Al-Qaeda leaders in power in Syria, the U.S. will remove Syria from a list of state-sponsored terrorism. Who knows if this guy even knows what's going on? Absolutely incredible. Include this. The actual link, by the way I have as well, it just shows you a dead page on Twitter, but it's real. That very much is confirmable.

Starting point is 04:00:49 And lastly, of course, here is the former FSB director. saying that Obama bin Laden was a U.S. agent and was later eliminated only when he began compromising American intelligence services. My simple point in this guy is like, I mean, I'll actually grab this up before we leave too. This is the Corbett page for the Al Qaeda documentary. False flags, a secret history of Al-Qaeda.

Starting point is 04:01:18 I'm telling you, if you want to be completely sold on what I'm saying, evidence nailed to the wall, you watch this and walk away, all three parts, and you tell me that you don't know as a matter of fact that these people work for the U.S. government in Israel. Now, as Americans,

Starting point is 04:01:32 we really need to stop pretending this is not obvious, guys. The U.S. government, all of it, no one to all sides, have been arming, funding, and working with the most radical elements of everything they claim to be fighting. Consider that domestically as well, guys.

Starting point is 04:01:50 It's the reality. Clue this for you on the way out. leave that there for today. Thank you for tuning in, guys. She gave me a little bit of time. She's going to hump up right now. Thank you for tuning in, guys. Those I don't know,

Starting point is 04:02:04 I've been keeping my pup in here with me while we record because it, you know, what I said last time? You know, that, you know, company, I think it's important, especially because I think it's good to have somebody in here with me that, you know, can be watching out for me.

Starting point is 04:02:18 There she is. But she's been very antsy to get out of here today. So I want to leave it there. Even because it's been about four hours. She's a great dog. But I'll leave it there for the day, guys. I mean, I just hope we continue to push this stuff out. I hope we continue to really change what's happening because it's there for you.

Starting point is 04:02:33 The opportunity is there. All right. Thank you for tuning in. I love you all. As always, question everything. Come to your own conclusions. Stay vigilant.

The Last American Vagabond - Data Centers CHOOSE To Use Fresh Water, Trump's Bumbling Iran War & The Impending Israeli False Flag

There aren't comments yet for this episode. Click on any sentence in the transcript to leave a comment.