The Last American Vagabond - Derrick Broze Interview - Technocracy's Detachment 201 & The Uniparty's Endless Pursuit Of War

Episode Date: June 26, 2025

Joining me today is Derrick Broze, here to discuss the recent development of "Detachment 201" (what I recently called "Technocracy in uniform") and what its implications are for the future of this country, and how all of this overlaps with Palantir and the overt focus on artificial intelligence. We also discuss the way the MAM/MSM chose to cover these major developments and how these stories as well as Trump's direct involvement in the Iran war have created what appears to be major fracturing within the partisan camps.Source Links:Welcome to the Palantir World OrderPalantir Partners with the Department of Defense on Controversial AI Project MavenElection 2024: Zionist Technocrats vs Zionist TechnocratsMeet The Peter Thiel Acolytes in Donald Trump's 2nd AdministrationNew TabPalantir’s ImmigrationOS fuels Trump administration’s immigrant removal agenda | Biometric UpdateThe Great Palantir Reset, American's Constitutional Decline & The Partisan End GameDetachment 201: The Merger of Big Tech and the U.S. Army - The Conscious Resistance NetworkDetachment 201 (Technocracy In Uniform), Trump's MAGA Divide & Israel's Iran Regime Change Two-StepNew TabState Dept Revealed To Be Using Israeli Intelligence-Linked Chat App Involved In Trump Admin HackPeter Thiel: Palantir, Israel Agree Strategic Partnership for Battle Tech - Bloomberg(9) Derrick Broze on X: "bad move. This is more exposure to EMFs, not to mention these devices can be connected to the Internet of Things control grid. I warned that the future of health tech was wearables and injectables in October 2020: https://t.co/rgGvB3qSh3" / XThe Future of Health Care Is Wearable Tech, Biosensors, and Injectables - The Conscious Resistance NetworkU.S. Government Awards Contracts to Seven Organizations with Ties to Gates Foundation, DARPA, Big TechMake American Healthy Again (With GMOs, Pharmaceuticals, AI & Nanotech) & The Partisan ImplosionIs Smart Dust Already In Use On The Population & Was "COVID-19" An Attempted Experimental Next Step?Stargate: Trump Partners with Technocrats to Promote mRNA Injections, AI, and TranshumanismIs Trump's EPA Planning to Continue the Appeal of the Historic Fluoride Ruling?New Tab(9) Nick Sortor on X: "🚨 #BREAKING: President Trump has convinced Bibi Netanyahu to END the war in Gaza within two weeks, per multiple reports The peace President NEVER stops! They’ve agreed that UAE, Egypt, and two other Arab states will govern Gaza jointly (replacing Hamas) Hamas leaders would be https://t.co/9wFEjc1Dq8" / X(9) Candace Owens on X: "I legitimately had to cross check truth social to see if this was real and it’s real. For anyone who would like to take a deeper look into Bibi Netanyahu, the Israeli documentary “The Bibi Files” does a pretty good job. Weigh that documentary against this Presidential statement:" / XNew Tab(9) Aaron Maté on X: "Not that we needed any more confirmation, but the Washington Post reports that the Israeli-US attack on Iran was decided months earlier and had nothing to do with nuclear weapons. Senior Israeli officials say they "already decided by March" to attack Iran -- the same month the https://t.co/LmAKBeHfjr" / XIran Bombs US Base In Qatar, Major Loss For Trump Admin In Garcia Case & Iran Sleeper Cell Psyop(7) The Last American Vagabond on X: "Because it is customary for the "sleeper cell" operatives to carry Iranian military identification? #QuestionEverything" / X(9) The Last American Vagabond on X: "We covered this in Jan 2024 when the same grifters told you he was Palestinian. He has a proven record of working for Mossad & after I revealed that they suddenly stopped caring. Now they use this again to claim he is from Iran for the narrative du jour. https://t.co/zg1Hx9OoWO" / XSuspected Terrorist At Texas Border Works For Mossad & "UNRWA Is Hamas" Exposed As Israeli OperationBitcoin Donations Are Appreciated:www.thelastamericanvagabond.com/bitcoin-donation(3FSozj9gQ1UniHvEiRmkPnXzHSVMc68U9f)The Last American Vagabond Substack is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. Get full access to The Last American Vagabond Substack at tlavagabond.substack.com/subscribe

Welcome to The Last American Vagabond. Joining me again today is Derek Brose to discuss just whatever the hell is going on in the world today. We haven't talked in a minute. There's so much, you know, really some very clear developments and stuff that we've been covering pretty extensively that we just wanted to connect on. I wanted to get his thoughts on certain things like Pallenteer, Detachment 201, possibly the war is going on. But just to connect in general to kind of just touch base and see, you know, how he's perceiving some of the different events, what's going on in Iran, foreign policy. So, Derek, how are you today? I'm doing great, brother. Thanks for having me back.

Yep, always a pleasure, my friend. So I think what's a good place to start in general is obviously the Pallentier conversations, it's an interesting development. You know, there's not, it's not, I mean, obviously part of it is sort of like, you know, we tried to warn everybody kind of a moment. But at the same time, it's not so much about, you know, it's about highlighting that it's a story that has clearly developed, you know, in a lot of ways like a lot of us were highlighting.

But then the way it's been dealt with, I find really revealing. And if I want your thoughts on that, like what? the way that, you know, because this became like a legitimate mainstream story, like exactly what we were trying to highlight, what you've been highlighting for a long time and not just the abstract, like technocracy discussion, but specifically how Palantir played a role, Peter Thiel, the connection to Trump's administration. And, you know, the, we talked about the black pill purity test point before the selection how people responded to that. But then this worked its way into like legitimate, like on the front page kind of conversation. And then the way

the mainstream alternative media responded to it. So, you know, what are your kind of feelings about that. Start where you're wanting that. You can talk about Palantir, but I want to get into how you feel about the way people responded to it becoming so obvious. Yeah, it's been interesting to see that for one, of course, the main way that everybody, a lot of people, especially in the kind of mainstream world, were learning about it, was from the New York Times report about the Gotham program that local police are using, as well as the sort of Trump executive order, which I know we both reported on individually, which was meant to create less separation between federal agencies.

And I've been kind of couching that development in the terms of this is part of the post-9-11 9-11 commission report that said, well, we need to make sure these agencies can communicate with each other because according to the official version of events, the reason the 9-11 attacks happened is because, well, the FBI had some information, the CIA had some information. But legally, they're not allowed to speak and communicate. So we need to tear down those walls and make sure that we can have more streamlined conversation. And so Trump's executive order was about that, was about separating these organizations, these government agencies, which are kind of siloed in their own areas and making it more streamlined,

making so that the data could come across different agencies. And that's the role that Pallantir is helping with. So that was kind of like the mainstream version of events. Obviously they didn't really put it in the deeper context. But still, even that, that got a lot of headlines. And the first reaction that I saw, particularly from MAGA, was to deny it. You know, this is New York Times. This is just coming from some anonymous sources or what, you know, they did whatever they could just sort of downplay it.

And to me, it's like, and I'm sure you and others, it's like, well, this is what we've been saying. And there's so much more. So that was interesting, but not surprising to see MAGA trying to just kind of deflect and say, no, no, no. This isn't, you know, this is just mainstream garbage or it's just left wing, uh, proper. In fact, I actually talked about a very short window. Yeah, exactly. And again, you know, it became, it became obvious that you couldn't deny it that this was a fact, right? So then the goal post kind of switched.

And you see, I talked about this in my show last night, like Alex Jones, Info Wars, did a whole thing trying to say, well, two things. One thing I saw them in general trying to downplay the role that Palantir plays and just be like, well, we've all known about Palantir. I don't know why people are making a big deal. But I also saw on Info Wars, they put out an article. One of the few articles they wrote about Bilderberg this year, obviously Peter Thiel and Alex Karp, steering committee members of the Bilderberg group as well as co-founders of Palantir. That conversation has pretty much been devoid and just absent in MAGA and kind of the right-leaning, so-called independent media, including Enful Wars.

And I've seen them, particularly Alex Jones, trying to say that the only people who are really upset about this are the left-leaning mainstream media and George Soros and the big tech companies that are mad that they're not getting the contracts that Palantir is getting. So he just tried to totally downplay. Like this is just some jealous companies and leftists. This isn't anything real to worry about. And to point out that he made the clear point, which is just flatly incorrect, that it was, they were angry because they were using it just to hold the government accountable,

despite the fact that it was exactly the opposite of the silent information was personal data. And even if it was, which I'm sure it's all of it. the data, that's not how it's being applied. They're not, it's not some guard dog, you know, watchdog against what the government's doing. So to argue it was just the left thing. And that was probably the most embarrassing of all the kind of sidesteps because it was just simply incorrect. And then that went away as well.

Yeah, and then not only that, but it's, it's just so, it's such a trip to what, not surprising. Like I said, I'm not surprised anymore by the people I see who in my mind are selling out principle and selling out what they claim to believe in the past. But, yeah, to try to downplay it and say, well, it's not. as bad as people claim or the other thing you're saying there's also Q&on types out there saying this is actually a trap that has been set for the deep state and Palantir is not being used to spy on the people but it's used to spy on the government and they're slowly gathering up all the data

they need and then soon the tribunals and all that same old stuff people are still trying to bring it back. How long is that been now? We're going on like 20 years. It's so crazy. And then of course there's the part of me there's a part of me that's like okay well more people are talking about Palantir. You and I and Whitney and James and others have been talking about this for for years now. And okay, it's probably a positive development that Palantir is trending, that, you know, I was getting invited to go on Jimmy Doors show to talk about Palantir and some other big platforms that are finally ready to talk about it. And almost to the point of like saturation where it's like it's everywhere. And that sometimes naturally brings up skepticism. I've seen some people in the

online chatter saying, you know, we should be skeptical of why they're allowing us to talk about this now. could it be a distraction for something else? Or is it just that Palantir is kind of being offered up and sort of sacrifice while they know about Palantir. So let's just throw them out there. And then, you know, some other company is going to become more important. Obviously, we don't know any of those things just yet. It all time might, you know, make that more clear to us. But even though we are seeing lots of people talk about Palantir where they weren't before, I still think that the company and the role they're playing is absolutely something we should be paying attention to because the articles I wrote for TLAV before the election, including election 2024 Zionist technocrats versus

Zionist technocrats. I pointed out and showed all these things and showed how there was pretty clear that Peter Thiel was going to have a major influence and Palantir would have a major influence not only because of J.D. Vance, but because of Trump's history with Peter Thiel. And then, of course, as soon as the pick started to come in, I wrote the article, Meet the Peter Thiel Acolytes in Trump's second administration. There's the one prior to the election that I took a lot of flag for. and people wanted to ignore. And then that one, meet the Peter Thiel Acolytes. And that was, I think I identified eight to ten of those.

And then the one after that, welcome to the Palantir World Order, we found up to like 15 to 20 people who were all related to Palantir, Peter Thiel, you know, worked for his companies or worked for Palantir directly and working with Doge and all this sort of thing. So none of this is surprising. In fact, this is what's been most disappointing to me is, okay, it's being talked about the mainstream. Great.

We expect the mainstream to do a shallow job, and that's what they did. But the independent media, the alleged independent media, it's like, okay, I'm glad more people are talking about it. And thankfully, some people are ready to have the deeper discussion. But the folks like Alex Jones and others in the MAGA media are doing their best to just downplay it. So I actually did a search. I went to Info Wars yesterday and searched Bilderberg 2025, searched Peter Thiel, just kind of to see what has been the most recent reporting from Alex Jones. Again, this is a guy who used to hold protests at the Bilderberg group and go bullhorn them.

And rightfully so and call out this stuff. And now there's literally no articles on his website that draw that connection and that distinction. I'll give them credit. They put Dan Dix's confrontation of Peter Thiel on their website. But still, they had this kind of editor's note on there that I mentioned that said, Alex Jones has been calling out the surveillance state for a long time and just did the whole downplaying. Only George Soros and Google and other companies are worried about just, you know, did their best to kind of like, if anybody started to think, well, wait, isn't Peter Thiel part of the Bilderberg group?

And I thought Alex Jones was against that, you know, just trying to sort of circumvent anybody who might question that narrative that it's not as big a deal as people are making it out to be. So it's been disappointing that people don't want to go as deep as they should. Yeah, I agree. I also, I think I've seen this. And this is not unique to him or any, you know, one group. But it's very common these days where, you know, you'll make a lot of other suggestive

points or rather most of your coverage very clearly. drives people toward a certain mindset, but then a tweet will go out about, you know, this might be a false flag. Even though everything else you've been saying points the other direction, you know, then that gets pointed to as I knew it. We were right. You know, and it's like that's, that's a very common tactic. And it only works on people that already choose to believe in you, regardless of the outcome precedent, what actually is being proven. And so that's what I see that as, you know, is sort of a way to get people to think that's really what the reality, you know, you posted to look at Dan Dicks doing this. That means we're on that side, even though you've done

everything else you could to downplay that, to hide that connection, to make Palantir a leftist thing that's not actually doing what it's doing. You know, that's really important to consider. Just trying to save the face. Yeah, I think so. Or I think it's more about trying to cement this ongoing narrative that somehow you're the one fighting these things while you're really doing the best job of cementing them, allowing people to ignore the real problem. And I think that's the biggest issue is people are, it's the identity politics, the woke left and right. It's the culture identity stuff. You know, it's everywhere. I just want to add to that just briefly. I mean, obviously it's related to Palantir, as we're discussing here, but just in the kind of broader terms of

people who prior to the election, and I won't name all the names I could name, but I will name a couple names like Dave Smith, Luke Rukowski, what's Clint Russell over at Liberty Lockdown, this, a few other people who have sizable platforms and, you know, claim to be libertarian or kind of beyond the left, right, right, they're not willing to go on every topic, but to some extent, right? But prior to the election, sure, they didn't necessarily, I mean, some of them did wholeheartedly endorse Trump and said, you know, hey, it's going to be better than Kamala. Others sort of gritted their teeth and said, yeah, I don't like him because of this and that, but he's still the better option. And others were even more subtle where they didn't necessarily fully on endorse Trump, but they definitely did a lot of

airtime dedicated to how stupid the Democrats are and how, you know, dumb the left is. And then kind of highlighting, well, Trump seems to say the opposite, which to me is even more, maybe nefarious because it's more subtle and the listener is just being shown these very, very still kind of binary perspective of it. Now a lot of those folks are like, hey, well, of course Trump's a bad guy. You know, Iran War, this is all bad news and technocracy and all the things I know we're going to get into further today. It's like now they're ready to report on that.

And I see some people saying, Derek, you know, get off your high horse or quit stroking your ego. Because, you know, there's some level of just to be real, like on a human level of like, yeah, I told you so, we told you so. And that doesn't give me any kind of like, oh, I'm patting myself on the back. Like, in fact, I would love to be wrong. I would love to be like sitting here and like, dang, we were wrong. And they were right.

Like Trump is actually fighting the deep state. And, you know, maybe I misunderstood. I misread the tea leaves or whatever. Because we want positive outcomes, Derek. That's why. We want a positive outcome. We don't want to be right. We know if we'd rather be wrong and have the right thing happen than the other way around.

Exactly. So it's not even, it's like, of course, a part of me is like, all right, feels good that my analysis and, you know, all of us, it's like was accurate. and that's one thing. But I think in a bigger picture, it's not just about stroking our egos or anything like that. It's for me what matters is that, like you said, we genuinely do care about the future of humanity. I care about the principles that I hold, the principles of individual liberty. And it saddens me and angers me to watch people who are influencers or, you know, claim to be journalist who use the influence that they have and then whether willingly or just ignorantly because they don't want to listen to us because we're just black pill, we're just

negative were just doomers when we were trying to say look both sides are being funded by the same people don't expect different results from trump or harris uh people didn't want to hear it and so it's a little bit frustrating now after the fact for everybody to be jumping on the bandwagon and and now they're sort of also i think trying to rewrite a little bit of history and act like they were always you know calling this stuff out and they've always been about this and i didn't endorse trump yeah but you sure spent a lot of time focused on the other side and how dumb they are and kind of subtly making this this appearance that, well, this side's all dumb and, hey, Trump did something good over here and completely ignoring all the warning signs. It's the same thing they call out in the left in COVID-19.

You know, partisanship has a really difficult time with self-reflection, I've noticed, you know, like recognizing the same fault, the same hypocrisy in themselves that they point out on the other side. I think that's part of the design, you know, and that's, it's a block. I mean, my biggest issue with that general discussion is people that I've talked to that I know, at least, you know, wax intellectual about the two-party illusion, right? We'll talk about and acknowledge the very clear deception and then every day they play into it. And I don't mean just like, you know, theorizing. I mean like playing into the illusory dynamic, the false binary, you know, and that's,

that's what gives me the most frustration. You know, it's like, you know better, man. You know, people who are now like, well, now that we see what Trump's doing, I'm going to vote a full Democrat. That'll show the system. You know, I'm going to go vote on the Democrats in the midterm. Do you, did you take that seriously? We don't have to get into who it was unless you want to, but did you take that seriously? Did you think that that was sort of like a joke?

I couldn't read it. I wasn't sure which way it felt real. And I was like, that's a crazy thing to say right now. I thought it was real. I know we're talking about the same person and we don't need to get into, you know, because I want to say this. Like there's some people who I do think deserve to be called out. That's why I mentioned Luke and Dave and some of these other people.

And that's, of course, each to us, each selective on our own preferences. There's other people who maybe I give a little bit of benefit of doubt or in private conversations, I might say, yeah, so-and-so is maybe kind of lost their way. But this particular person is a journalist, is somebody who is exactly what you were just describing, called out the left and the right, and then kind of maybe joking, but it didn't seem like a joke saying, well, I'm going to, you know, show them by voting straight Democrat in the midterms and that, you know, teach them a lesson or something like that. And to me, I'm just like, oh, my God, this is, we're going to do the same thing again in four years, aren't we? We're going to,

we're going to watch the same thing happen again. There's going to be some new population hero that will emerge on the left or the right and promise to fix everything bad that Trump did and it's just going to keep going back and forth. That is definitely one of the more frustrating things, whether or not that particular person was joking or being sarcastic. There are people who will think that way. There are absolute people who will think that the best, now, maybe they won't go vote full on Democrat because, and even in that case, I don't know what's better. I mean, what do you think about this man? Because some people are like, well, yeah, Trump did some bad things, but I'm still going to vote for Republicans in the next thing.

And then that's obviously not very principled. There doesn't make much sense. But then to think voting for the other side, full on is somehow going to, you know, achieve your ends. Like it just neither one of them seemed to be thinking too deeply about the outcomes. Well, this is why, Dave, you know, like the last election product, we, it's more important than ever to argue, you know, at least hope, you know, to give people the tools to consider why another path might be the right path. And there's many we could talk about.

We've talked about many times. You know, and that's why that's becoming more popular. And I think why the whole system is feeling desperate and vulnerable because people are finally asking these questions. And just to put a point on it, since we went over, we went over it. We're talking about Kim Iverson, correct? That's the person we're referring to in that tweet. And I think she, my gut tells me that she was kind of joking.

But that's the point is I couldn't tell. And the reason I thought it was so relevant, you know, because I do also agree. She does good work. And I don't agree with everything. But she calls out, but she, you know, it's objective, like a Glenn Greenwald, who has clearly shown himself to stand. with principles when it comes to the left-right paradigm, criticize everything else.

We all will, too. There's plenty of things to question. But what's interesting is this came out with Jimmy Dore the last time. And like I said then, even if they really mean that or if you really mean to the point is there's there is a level of logic to it. I disagree with it. But like for example, Jimmy said at the time, out of all the arguments, this is the one that I said, okay, well, at least there's some logic to it, that he's going to vote for

Republican for Trump because why is he going to reward the party that? committed the genocide could Trump at that time hadn't technically been part of the genocide right so he is now obviously but so he that made sense to me even though i disagree i know it's a trap i still said okay at least the logic is there everyone else like she's going to be worse is just frustrating so now it's i almost felt like that was her making a joke of that right where now i'm just going to vote the other way i hope so her past record that's what i took from it but you know we should since we talked about infill that report just point that out yeah and just in case this clip makes its way to Kim, like, of course, I'm super grateful for the things you've done for having me on your show.

And I know, Ryan, you've interviewed with her as well. You know, so it's not, I'm not trying to just shit on, on you Kim or her or her work or anything like that. But I do think that is a big part of the problem. And I know that when I've spoken with her and other people, and I get to the point of saying, like, look, politics isn't going to save us, you know, and I have my own theories and ideas. And I'm not claiming those are the only way towards freedom. But I definitely feel like at this point, you know, I'm a 40-year-old adult. I've watched this happen since I was 18. The first time I ever voted, I voted for John Kerry, the only time I ever voted because I was anti-war against George Bush. This is 22 years ago, 20 years ago, you know, and it didn't take but one time of doing that to realize,

like, oh, my God, this is just back and forth, back and forth, right? So when we see people who are clearly intelligent and clearly informed and, you know, spend a lot of time doing this work that we do as well, it's just hard for me to see how people can keep playing in that trap. And I understand what you're saying as well that, okay, it makes some sense and some logic within the two-party paradigm of like, well, if this party is doing bad, I'm going to, you know, punish them by voting for the other side. But I think that's also just the fundamental flaws that, like, we're still playing within their context of the predator classes game. You know, it's like, I've said this before. They know how to handle us if we protest. If you march, if you rally, if you go out and try to be violent, they know how to handle that.

They'll round you up or lock you up. They'll shut you down, whatever. They know how to handle voting. They'll just rig the elections, as I think most elections are actually selections. They'll continue to prop up puppets in front of you. But what they don't know how to handle is us removing our consent and saying, all right, well, then I'm not going to play anymore. And I did a video about this after the election, too, that once again, the largest demographic across the United States was non-voters. It was even with them saying this is a historic election and, you know, more people did vote.

maybe than previous years, but still in the broader context, that's not really much. There's still the vast majority of the country who is not voting. And that doesn't mean they're all kind of on the same page as you or I are on. But there at least there are maybe some levels of apathy or they're just dissatisfied with the choices, things like that. That does give me some hope that maybe more people could recognize that politics isn't the answer. And then, well, how do we actually, you know, take care of ourselves? That's a whole other conversation that we've had before. but to me it's just like if we continue to see journalists and influencers and podcast hosts and talking heads on the internet just keep pushing their audience in that direction I mean this is why

I've been calling for some level of accountability not not in the sense of like let's you know let's round them all up and put them to death or put them in you know cast them out of society or something like that but yes I think it is important to know who was shilling for Trump and and ignoring the evidence that you and I and Whitney and others could clearly see and sending their massive audiences of hundreds of thousands or millions of people to go vote for Trump. And Ian Carroll, of course, is one of these people, him and I've gone back and forth over that. And I told him these things would happen before the election. And here we are. Now he's like, oh, Palantir, this and that. It's like, oh, come on, bro. I mean, did you, you got this,

you knew this ahead of time. And I'm not going to fault people totally for wanting to believe or wanting to have some level of hope. But we've said before on this show and on different independent media alliance panels that it's actually not it's a white pill to accept that politicians aren't going to come save you it's not a black pill it's not dumer to just to kind of step up and be an adult about the situation and say look we can't trust these people i have to take care of myself now how do i step into that space as an empowered person instead of being like well okay they're not coming to save us so i guess everything's screwed that's the actual black pill the people who bought into that like well if trump's not a hero of q and on's a sigh up well then we're just you know

and i heard this before the election all right dare you Eric, I hear what you're saying. Okay, Bilderberg group, Palantir, Peter Thiel, but I'm still going to try with Trump because if Trump isn't a hero and if he doesn't win, it's going to be full on communism. It's going to be full on totalitarianism. So people put all their hope in like this one person or this one movement. And if that's not true, then everything's lost. But in fact, no, nothing. It's, yes, we have to accept that. But that doesn't mean all is lost. It means that the power is back in your hands. And instead of outsourcing your freedom, your fight for sovereignty, you have. to take personal responsibility. And I think that's scary for a lot of people too. Yeah, most definitely. I mean, self-responsibility is like the most important tenant of any, you know, whatever you want to call it. This in this self, you know, representative government or whatever we feel we exist in. It's absolutely important that we do that, you know, because clearly they will manufacture power structures will manufacture situations as we all acknowledge at least in part of the other side or how do you want to

look at it. We all acknowledge it exists to create circumstances that drive you into the places they need you to be. Now, in some part of the world, maybe they think they're doing it for the right reasons. It doesn't change the reality of what we're discussing, you know, and that we have to start considering how that could be played out or how they could be played without knowing it. You know, it's just, it is self-responsibility, but this whole system, it's like it's creating this learned helplessness

where, you know, well, yeah, like maybe that'll be in the future, but right now it's just so bad that we have to versus, you know, one versus the other, you know, it's engineered helplessness. And we, and it's so obvious. And I'll get to that self-ownership later, Derek. At some point I'll do that right now. this is the only way to fix things. So I'll put that off in the future. Yeah, maybe one day I'll get to that. But this is what we have to do now. And I just wanted to add to what you're saying that. I think it, again, I'll try to empathize with people. We got siops on top of sciops on top of siops here, right? And I get that it's difficult. And I'm not claiming to fully understand or no 100%. But what I have come to the conclusion, I think what you were just pointing out and we're seeing in so many other areas, immigration and things like this, is I believe that the predator class, they put two or more choices. in front of us and none of them are good.

So just to use immigration, like people think it's like the dichotomy of the binary is like, well, here's a bad choice and the other one must be good or slightly better. But a lot of people haven't considered, what if all the choices were placed there on purpose and none of them are good for us? And none of them are actually good, but they want to make you choose one where they're going to win either way. So the immigration thing,

we know that immigration has been weaponized. And for years, even before Biden, but definitely during Biden's administration, it was allowed to kind of get uncontrolled. I also think at the same time there's a lot of right-wing propaganda that has told people Chinese agents have been sleeping in and Iranian sleeper cells and they're eating your dogs and your you know all kinds of stuff that has later been proven to be false but people believed it and bought into it.

But yes, immigration has been weaponized. And so that grows and festers. And then the people, of course, are like, well, we got to do something. And then the options they're being presented with is elect Trump and we're going to have the largest deportation operation ever. We're going to militarize the border. We're going to ignore due process. We're going to do whatever.

And labeling everybody gang members. I think we can see why that's a dangerous direction or do nothing and just allow this immigration policy or lack of policy to just continue to fester and, you know, see where that goes, right? So neither choice is really ideal. You don't have to be some open border, you know, radical leftist to see that, you know, that the current situation we're dealing with Trump is not a good idea. And you also don't have to be some hard right conservative to see that there is a problem with immigration, right?

And so, but what's not on the table is common sense solutions like, hey, how about we end the warfare state and the welfare state and actually fix the immigration system so that people could get in in a timely manner and you could bring in good people into the country who are just trying to live their lives and contribute, right? That's not what's on the table. It's this one extreme of do nothing and let immigration just flow endlessly forever and take ice and they're not going to do their jobs or empower ICE to become the Stasi and, you know, get full on, you know, early state. of fascism. Like, that's what I mean is, like, I think that the sciops are at that point that we shouldn't assume that the choices being placed in front of us are going to benefit us either way. And I don't know what the choice is or how you, how we approach that best.

But I do think the best thing I can come up with is to not fall for the siops, to not allow yourself to be emotionally manipulated to fall for Trump and the authoritarianism or to the idea, which sometimes the left is like, you know, they're kind of unreasonable and they're just like, No, we just need to, you know, let everybody in and everything's fine. And they kind of have this very naive view of what that actually looks like and how that turns out. Really, neither of those choices are benefiting us. Well, it's the way you described it. It's exactly.

And I mean, I think it's obviously by design, but it doesn't have to be for those that don't want to think that people collude and conspire to control your life. But clearly, it's leading to a point to where we have choices that are not in the interest of Americans in any way. And they'll admit that. It's the same thing with the last selection process where it's like, well, we all agree, but he's just better. She's worse. It's not about the good option. And so we're in a place where we're watching this.

And you know, you get the screamers out there like we saw before that will act like, you know, you've got to be an adult in the room. You know, you have to admit that this is the only way we can do it. And that tricks a lot of people, a lot of good intention people into thinking they're not smart enough to grasp the political dynamic. And so they fall into these choices, which they'll admit are not what I want, but as you said, well, the next time we'll be able to do it, you know, but by the time you get there. There's been 37 other sciops that create the same kind of hair on fire.

We have to choose right now between these two things. You know, it's like that red button meme. That's everything in our life right now. It's always down to these two fake choices. And I think people start to, I think there's a sense that right now, though. I really do. And I think that's why to get to the next part of this, the, the technocratic, you know, really, that's what we seem to obviously see in all this. But just the, whatever you want to call it, the control structure that's being built is being built in my mind to, make that no longer possible, like where our choice, their concern over what we see seems to no longer be relevant, you know?

And so let's get into the whole, you know, using all of what we're talking about to drive us not so subtly into like the technocratic control structure. You'd mentioned the, you know, the silo of information with Palantir. And that's very clear. If people haven't seen that, watch both of our work on this or read it about the, you know, removing of the silos using Doge and Palantir to scrape all this information, jamming it to basically one location,

no concern for privacy or security. I'm convinced that Israel and their intelligence has complete access to this. And using immigration, right, that rolls over into, oh, they're just including the same thing, the Great Palantier Reset to what you discussed. Detachment 201.

I discussed it as well. I called a technocracy in uniform. So let's talk about that. I really think this is a, I mean, it's actually, I never would have predicted that that's the step,

that obvious, to just put the CTOs of these companies, He's meta-palenteer OpenAI into the military as lieutenant colonels, no less. So give us your thoughts on that. What does that mean? How am alarming is that? I'm glad to see that you were covering it as well, man, because I saw somebody had shared with me the announcement, and it was interesting.

I was reflected on this the other day, actually, how many things happened that week? If you think about the Bilderberg group was going on the same week that Trump was preparing for his military parade that Saturday. And on the day before, the Friday is when that picture that you were showing. showing there when they were sworn in the heads of these different companies. And then, of course, right after that, Israel starts bombing Iran. I tend to think that some of these decisions, maybe Detachment 201 was kind of already in the process, obviously, because they swore them in on that Friday.

But I do think some of the bigger geopolitical decisions may have been made there at the Bilderberg group. And it's also interesting, as I note in my short article there over at the Conscious Resistance.com that, you know, of course, Palantir is represented through carp and teal at the Bilderberg group. but they're also officials from Microsoft and OpenAI who've been there. Yeah, man, it's just, to me, it's just that further merging of these different institutions. We've already been talking about it with government and technocracy and things like Doge and the influence of the efficiency movement and Curtis Jarvin and all this kind of stuff.

But we hadn't yet seen the military get involved. And that's what I think makes this unique is, as you said, like taking these four executives, giving them a lieutenant colonel position in the Army Reserve, which is typically reserved for people who are in their like second decade of their career and you know and they typically do oversee several hundred to maybe even up to a thousand soldiers we might we probably won't see that with these people hopefully not god it would be more disturbing if we end up seeing these big tech execs like actually in charge of soldiers i mean i don't know what that looks like they're climbing real quickly i would say the logical connection would be you know a new kind of battalion or drones

or technological you know biosuits or something like that i i manage you know, neuro technology to where they would be leading that special tech part of the field. That's what I'm telling you. That's like my nightmares. But go ahead. Yeah, no, you're probably right. It might not be, because I mean, everything's changing, right? So it might not be a typical battalion in the sense that we think of it of just like

leading soldiers. It could be that they, or the soldiers that they are kind of overseeing could be a hundred guys sitting at computers in, you know, Las Vegas at an air base or something like that, right? Like that we've seen with the drones and things of that sort. So it isn't, you're right, that it could come in a completely different. context than what we're used to because warfare is changing. And obviously, this also, for me, goes towards fifth generation warfare, the idea that social media and the internet itself is the battlefield and the mind is the battlefield.

So of course they're going to want to work closer with these big tech companies, which already have massive amounts of data on people. And they kind of term it as this is just about modernizing the military and making it more efficient because I will say, and again, who knows how much of this is propaganda, but I've heard it from soldiers as well that even the U.S. military for all their alleged an apparent might empower that a lot of the military and government systems are decades behind, which again, like I said, that could be sciops in order to convince us that we need to allow them to work with the big tech bros and further kind of dilute those apparent separations. But those of us

who've been paying attention, we understand that, well, Palantir is actually born out of DARPA and the Total Information Awareness Program. Of course, DARPA is part of the U.S. U.S. military. So there's already been this connection between the military and a lot of these big tech companies since the very beginning, since their founding, since their initial funding rounds as well with Incutel. This is just like, I think, kind of taking off the mask and completely removing, or at least a first step in the process of completely removing any sort of apparent separation from those institutions. And the same way that we know social media companies and other big tech companies started out with Facebook, et cetera, with the funding,

and the more we see them working with like the Atlantic Council or with the Atlantic Council represents NATO. So this isn't 100% new, but the fact that they're like literally sworeing them in as soldiers is kind of like, wow, okay, we're at that point now. Now they're part of the military. What sort of, you know, and that could be as well that maybe they needed to be sworn in in order to be granted certain access

to classified documents or, you know, sort of, you know, who knows what the real purpose of this. was, but I don't think it's going to be the end. I would imagine that detachment 201, which is what they're calling. And as I point out in my little piece there, that it's somewhat reminiscent for many of us to event 201. And they say, well, this has to do with HTTP commands. It's, you know, not relevant.

And maybe that's true. Maybe that's where they got it from. But it sure doesn't make you feel very good to see them using those numbers again. Well, the point was, if I remember correctly, that 201, there is a reference to like the starting of some new part of the coding. So basically 201 in either context. the text is referenced to them beginning a new chapter of something. And I think that's very relevant.

So that's why they would call it that, you know, in either case. But yeah, to me, you're right. You nailed it with like the power. Like I agree with the first part that I think this is not, it's not new. It's them showing, you know, they're stepping out of the shadows. Like these people that are actually pulling the strings are now seizing positions of actual power is what it feels like to me. And I think we're seeing that in a lot of context, whether it's Zionism influencing these,

you know, these cabinets or whatever we're talking about. we're seeing a lot of alarming power shifts that aren't being regarded as such in the mainstream alternative or mainstream media, you know, or even like the point of like Prospera and Honduras or these different elements we're seeing like that. I think that all of these are moves in that same direction and giving them actual level, high level power in the military. It just is, it's a step too far from. That's what I say. It's technocracy and uniform. You're actually showing, you're proving what we're saying. Like this is, these are the, the AI, Silicon Valley tech experts who are now putting themselves in positions of power or vice versa

in the government, in the military. You know, it's like this just needs to be acknowledged as the evidence of exactly what we're warning about. And how is that not alarming for people? How is it like Silicon Valley used to be like this, I don't know if it's ever real or not, but they had this really hard line in the sand, like, we will not cross over, you know, politics. And, you know, and then when they started obviously being shown to be involved in drones and with Palantir and Google, all their people were protesting, going, that's not who we are.

You know, clearly, it kind of was always what they were. but now this is just revealing that same point. You know, it's just, I mean, where do you think this goes next? And it's another one. Well, and it's another one that I'm surprised that there's not more coverage of. I mean, I had somebody send it to me. And when I first saw it, I was like, okay, well, that's interesting. And then the reason I chose to actually write the article, because I wrote it a few days after the announcement,

I tend to sort of like when a story breaks, I kind of wait and see. And if it's all over the place everywhere or, you know, like you and others, I'm like, all right, well, they've got it covered. Enough people are here. And there's no need for me to kind of, you know, rehash that. But it was the exact opposite. I'm like, okay, so nobody else is talking about this. And I was grateful to see that you were as well. And I've seen some tweets here and there, but by and large, I haven't seen many people talking about detachment 201 and definitely not understanding the

context that we're talking about here. In terms of what happens next, I mean, I was just thinking as you were speaking there, that I wonder if these lieutenant colonels, which is now the rank they have, if they have the authority in their kind of unique position to bring in more people from their crew, like what sort of powers do they have underneath their belt now, now that they're giving this rank, like I said, is usually reserved for people who are two decades into their career and have proven themselves in the military. They have some level of authority. They've got soldiers underneath them, right?

So could these tech execs swear in more of their employees, or could they allow, you know, Now that I'm a lieutenant colonel, I have certain access to information. So maybe that means I can bring in some of my employees and my engineers into the military bases because while they're with me and they have clearance or things like that, I think there's just a lot of unforeseen outcomes that we're going to have to wait and see. But overall, to me, this is just a step in that direction. I wouldn't expect it to be the last. I'm sure we will see more tech execs follow this program, especially because they made a big deal of like this is the first move in the detachment 201 program. which itself is part of another broader Army transformation initiative. So I wouldn't be surprised if we see more of this.

What you mentioned is where I think concerns me, the potential access to high-level information, which is already there in like 100 other obvious overlaps, but maybe there are levels within the military that aren't there, and whether it's Silicon Valley and people that are showing themselves to be true to themselves before anything else, or the influence through them. I mean, let's be obvious about,

who these people were talking about, volunteer, you know, Titeal, carp. These are like diehard Zionist supporters of Israel. And that worries me in this overlap. You know, what are they gaining access to? And even if you don't think that's the case, well, you know, they're, just consider it being anybody else in the world. Shouldn't we be worried that there's people out there that have interest that go beyond American interests who now have access to internal high level information?

Obviously, we saw this with Waltz, using telemessage on his phone, which is an Israeli intelligence app, to archive their signal app. you that conversation and that and then and then your phones got hacked you know and it's like well surprise surprise and that's the inner circle guys you know yeah before we go to the oh good go ahead I was just going to say in just one other piece to kind of add to the Israel piece you're mentioning there is that we know how many of these big tech firms also have Israeli connections because you know you've got unit 81 unit 8200 the Mossad obviously the Taupiat program there's many many pieces of the Israeli intelligence network

that are directly tied to the tech sector and big tech sector in the U.S. So there could be some overlap as well there, right? Like do these companies, whether knowingly or otherwise, let's just imagine the Israeli networks have infiltrated without even the permission of OpenAI or Palantir, although like you said, Palantir is pretty openly embraced them. So I don't think they would have any qualms with giving them access. Maybe through that, they accessed U.S. military secrets or U.S. military and tech. I mean, there's all sorts of things that I think could go wrong here.

That's what worries me the most, you know, is where that goes. And so before we go back to Israel and maybe, you know, finish and talking about some foreign policy, there's an obvious point to go on this that connects to the overlap of all we've been discussing that you commented on recently. And this is, you know, and we can obviously go into a lot of different things here, the contradiction of the leadership in the Maha movement, not necessarily everybody who believed that's where it was going. Because I still think they're largely in their intentions were good. They got played by people like this who are rolling out. about CRISPR pig meat, MRNA shots, MMR shots, I mean, self-amplifying shots,

or any number of other things allowing the PFS restrictions to be removed. I mean, I'm shocked to see how brazen the 180 wasn't a lot of this. But so you recently commented on the wearables, this conversation. And then Secretary Kennedy put this out. Wearables put it basically what he says is by the end of what, the year that or a couple years, he thinks that everyone should have a wearable. And so you just said it was a bad move and listed the obvious. So what are your thoughts on that and all that?

Where do you want to go? Well, so if you click that link there to the conscious resistance, that's a report I did, which is actually based on an article I wrote for TLAV. And funny thing about this, so that's just my video version of the article, the articles and the show notes that we did a while back about this whole wearable thing. Yeah, right there, that article, the U.S. government awards contracts of seven organizations with ties to Gates Foundation, DARPA and Big Tech. And I was just showing how in there that a lot of those companies,

companies focus on wearable technologies and things of that sort and kind of showing. This is October 2020, so we're in the middle of COVID. And it wasn't necessarily a prediction, but all the signs are there. And here we are five years later. And the new head of the HHS, who's supposed to be Maha is here saying that that's going to be the future. And in the next couple years, I think he said three or four years that everybody would be wearing them.

Thankfully, there has been a lot of pushback. And people are, you know, it's not like Maha is taking this laying down, although I think a lot of people are disappointed for sure. And I do think I agree with your analysis there that while I have been pretty critical of Kennedy and I will continue to be, I do think there's a lot of well-meaning and tension people who jumped on board of that movement and absolutely did follow Trump simply based on the Maha promises, which I think was part of the Saoap as well, whether Kennedy was fully aware or not, that that was part of, because we know that Trump, he needed the libertarians, he needed the crypto crowd, just as far as for whatever you think of the elections are real. Even if we know the elections are rigged and Trump was totally selected, which is what I believe, there still needs to be the appearance of unity. There needs to be the appearance of like a momentum of a movement, right? Because if there was no movement and all of a sudden this happened, there would be a lot more

skeptical people. But now people are like, what are you talking about, Derek? We built a movement, a coalition. We had Tulsi, we had RFK. We had all these disaffected Democrats and we had the crypto bros and we had the libertarians and we came together in this beautiful coalition. And that's how we won. So it gives this air of legitimacy.

But the point is that a lot of people did vote for Trump and have joined this kind of movement, skeptically, you know, very uncertain. But they did so because they believe, well, at least maybe we can get some movement around the health aspect. And to be certain, I mean, yeah, I get like they felt like there was a gamble and people tell me, Derek, well, there's no chance of this happening with Kamala Harris. So I'm going to go with Trump. And, yeah, the, I think it's the ACIP, the vaccine committee that a lot of the mainstreams make it a big deal about right now. that RFK and his team, they removed all the old people and they put in new folks like Robert Malone.

I am also skeptical of Robert Malone in some of his connections and his discussion of the CIA. But even putting that aside, I can objectively say, that's probably better. They're probably going to do better than the previous guys would do. But that doesn't, we shouldn't ignore then that Trump's FDA has approved to fast-track to MRI injections already. And you mentioned the Stargate, MRNA-AI stuff. HHS under RFK declaring anti-Semitism, you know, one of the greatest health, public health threats. And there's also still the other, we haven't talked about this in a while, but the other one that I'm still keeping an eye on. And I did write one article for TLAV maybe a month ago, but there's been more updates, is that the Trump administration is still showing all signs that they are going to fight the ruling of the Floyd lawsuit.

Right. I published this a couple weeks ago. They did their third request. So, you know, for those who have missed it, last year federal judge rules that the EPA is supposed to act either ban fluoride or do something. And that was under the Biden administration, of course. And right before Biden left, his EPA did issue an appeal. And so then it's like, okay, let's kind of wait and see. Is Trump going to continue the appeal? A lot of MAHA people, including my friends over at the Floyd Action Network and people who are involved in that lawsuit are like, no, no, he's going to come in. They're going to shut the appeal down and we're going to see what the EPA does. Well, it's about to be July and they're still fighting that appeal. And that gentleman you're showing on screen there, he is the surgeon general now,

and he's also a lawyer who defended Trump during some of the impeachment hearings in the past. And his attorneys have now requested and received three different extensions. So they were supposed to make a decision if they were going to appeal back in March or April, and then they delayed it to April, and then they delayed it till May, and then they delayed it to June. The most recent one I saw was an extension to like July 11th. When we discussed this on the interview that that was at the point where they had delayed it once. Is that correct? They had delayed it twice then and now there's been a third one since then. So I think that article there. Yeah, I think in that article I posted that their next deadline was June 11th,

but right before June 11th came up, they extended again. So I think it's like July 5th or I'll have to look up the exact date. But I've been following the court records because again, the corporate media is not following this. So you just got to log in and you got to follow the court records and you can see, and I quoted them from there, it seems pretty clear that the Trump administration is going to continue to fight it because what they've said several times now is that we need more time to review the scientific data before the surgeon general can decide if he's going to go through it. Basically they're saying like, we make a report, we pass that to the assistant surgeon general, he reviews it, he makes some recommendations, and then that goes to the surgeon

general, and he's the one who makes the actual final call. But in my mind, and this is what Michael Conant, who's a lead attorney who told me, and I think it's quoted in that article that we've already had numerous reviews. We don't need the EPA to do more reviews on top of reviews and have this thing delay for another five, ten years and it never happens. The Trump administration... Exactly. And if the Trump administration wants to follow the federal government's own report of the

National Toxicology Program or follow the ruling of a federal judge and follow Maha because RFK surely knows there's problems with fluoride, then there should be no question. It should just be we're rescinding the appeal. the EPA is going to act, and that's a done deal. Instead, they're delaying and delaying and saying, we're going to let you know, we'll figure it out soon. And there's been no major reporting on this. And I think they might be hoping that people just kind of forget about it and the whole thing goes away. So frustrating. Yeah. So they delayed it again since we talked. I mean, yeah, and I, you know, the fact that the evidence was already, they've gone through this all the times you've already

been covering it, the many different times they've tried to roll it back and the evidence was already there. you know, we can hope, as always, we should hope, as I get where they're coming from, that this is going to go the right direction, but the moment that this doesn't, we're going to be screaming about it, right? And it's, everyone needs to call it out because this is a major, I mean,

this is about the same level for me as the MMR shot, which was insane to see RFK Jr. go the way he did with that. So, you know, fluoride being something he's been adamant about over the years. And so we'll have to see when it happens, but Derek will be covering when it happens. So look forward to that. Yeah, it's frustrating, man. I mean, it's just so much of this stuff.

And it just, this is why, again, the point of the community, there's a lot of them. Like I'll point out Mary Talley Bowden, for example, MD, who she, she's been very aggressive about this, rightly so, you know, going like, it's about principles. And this is wrong. The moment they went away from it, she's like not, that's not what we promised. That's wrong. And that's what it takes today. We have to start standing by our principles and we're going to get lost. I do appreciate her and others that have a bigger platform that are calling out.

And that's one good thing I will say about the sort of the social media aspect of this is that when RFK makes these tweets, look at the comments. I mean, he's getting ate up by his own people, people who are like, you sold out, this is not what I voted for. Now, obviously that, who knows if that translates into anything, but at the very least, it's good to see that not everybody following Trump or following RFK are sick of fans and that some people are choosing to stick with principles over, you know, personalities. I, you know, I get the sense that it's a lot more than we think and that there's a lot of people in the middle of all this who don't have a voice, who don't have a large following, who don't, you know, in the sense of like being seen in the conversation out there,

who just are very unhappy with what's going on, you know, but they're not out there waving their hands going, we shouldn't pick tomorrow. They still think, you know, in their minds, there's still was only two choices, but they're not happy with this. And I'm talking to more of them every single day.

They just don't, you know, they get drowned out by the next orders and Jones of the world who just scream the narrative over the top of everybody. And, you know, and then it gives them some feeling like, okay, maybe I'm wrong. You know, maybe this is, maybe we're still winning, you know,

and they fall back in line, you know. But I think that people recognize how, how, you know, this is not going the direction that they'd wanted, you know. And so let's finish with a conversation of some foreign policy, because obviously this is a very, very large conversation going on. So first, excuse me, before we talk about Iran and some different points, speaking of manipulators, let's, here's what Nick's order put out around Gaza, which I just think says a lot. And we've seen this so many

times. He says, breaking, President Trump, which again, you know, wasn't breaking. He saw somebody else report it and then reported it. It says, Donald Trump has convinced Bibi, they all love to call him Bibi now because Trump said that. To end the war in Gaza within two weeks per multiple reports. So point is a report went out saying something we've heard a thousand times and never actually happened, right? Then he goes, the peace president never stops. I'm like, you know, being a cheerleader today is so self-evident.

You know, we don't even know what's happening yet. But it says they've agreed that you, Egypt and two other countries will govern Gaza. Oh, okay. So we're now at the point again where Palestinians don't decide their own future. So they'll say no and they'll be blamed for not wanting peace. It's like the same old cycle, man. But just want to point out, and if you want me comments on Gaza, since it seems to be kind of the back burner of the conversation right now in foreign policy,

it frustrates me. We're still playing this game where the fake ceasefire so we can get a moment of some kind of fake win, like when he took a game into power and they pretended there was a ceasefire that we all knew they were going to break, you know, and the idea that they're not making their own choices. Go ahead. That's what's been coming to my mind, too, because I've had some Trumpers in my comments when I made like a big post,

several posts the last week about the bombing of Iran. and just sort of, hey, here's your peace president, right? And now it's funny, even Nick there, who I cannot stand that dude, is kind of twisting it. It's like when we say he's not a peace president, it's because he's bombing people and he's doing without congressional approval, and because he dropped more drone bombs than Obama, and, you know, he helped Saudi Arabia massacre Yemen.

We could go on and on, right? He's funding Gaza, et cetera, the massacre of Gaza. But then they're twisting it of peace president because he's going to allegedly broker a peace deal, even if in the process of getting this alleged peace deal, it means him launching wars and bombs and killing people, or at least supporting that. Or,

I think that's part of the manipulation. Or the fact that he's aren't, you know, let's just assume for sake of conversation he's actually seeking peace, which I don't believe, and I think the facts back it up. But even if he is, you're seeking peace for something you started.

You can't be called a peace president for brokering a peace in a war that you initiated or rather with your allies that you back. I mean, so, but they know that, though. I mean, or I mean, I shouldn't give them to intelligence, but I think that largely they're aware they're being deceptive in my opinion. I think so. And then the other point I would make is what the second part of his comment was alluding to, which you pointed out, is that, okay, so this alleged peace deal does not involve Palestinians having a voice. This involves other nations like the U.S. And this is to me just one of the fundamental problems with this is like people say, well, Iran shouldn't have access to nukes.

And it's like, well, why is it the U.S. that gets to decide that? why is it that nations like Israel and the U.S. who have weapons of mass destruction are the ones they get to decide who else gets to have those weapons of mass destruction? And I guess that's the answer as well because they've got the weapons and they could decide who gets to keep them. And if not, they're going to use them on people. But it's just that sort of unspoken assumption that, well, we're the U.S. government is the good guys. The U.S. military is the good guys. And so we're the ones who get to decide who gets to have what on the world stage. But then also that like that so the UAE, which is not going to,

known for human rights, caring about human rights. Egypt, same problems and other Arab states are going to govern Gaza, not the Palestinian people, not a two-state solution, not Palestinians themselves, nothing of that. It's just we're going to get some other foreign governments to come in there. And I bet you those foreign governments would like to have a piece of that, you know, that real estate that we all know that they're after and that Jared Kushner and others would love to have. And even Trump shared, you know, those freaking AI generated videos of him and Netanyahu hanging out

on the beach and stuff like that. So it's really demoralizing and frustrating to me, man, because this is, in my view and my perspective, all of this in the battle that the Palestinian people have been fighting for generations now is just another legacy of colonization. And colonization obviously has impacted the entire world. But this is like one of the places in the world where it's still ongoing, where there's a people who are being colonized by people from around the world

just because they happen to be Jews. and that's not to say that the people who are, I have friends who are born and raised in Israel, and they didn't start this conflict. They're not to blame for it necessarily. But I do think there's something that people need to come to atone for. Is that like, well, the land you are living on, though,

did belong to somebody else. And even if it's not your fault and you were born into this, and not saying you need to be exterminated or, I don't, not even necessarily saying you need to be taken out of your home, but at the very least, these people should be allowed to exist where they have been, where they're, you know, other ancestors have been and where, you know, they were born into instead of being removed.

And it shouldn't be this sort of paternal, which is unfortunately the way that government works, this sort of paternal system that says, well, we're going to from on high kind of dictate what these people should do because we know what's better for them. When really it just comes down to that the world is beholden by the Zionist regime, most of the Western nations are, as this audience knows very well, and they will not allow a situation where Israel does not have the upper hand. And that's what it all comes down to. Right. And I would argue each one of those countries they're pointing to would in their own way allow Israel to rule Gaza through them, if not blatantly over the top of all of them, which is

probably what's really going to happen. You know, so it's just very, it's infuriating. They're all just puppets of Israel in their own way. Yeah, I agree. I agree. And what's frustrating is that this, you know, the sentiment being pushed out about them being decided or, you know, every single element of this, not to get into it today, because we're just touching on this, all of it are based on lies, from the occupation itself to the, you know,

the illusion of what's really going on, the election of Hamas, the funding of Hamas, you know, and it's just so frustrating. We should have to play games with people that are being willfully dishonest or have no idea what they're talking about in the context of all of this. The world is aware of what is real is.

And as your point, that's not all Jews or all anything other than the people in the Zionist government committing these crimes, you know, and that's what, and through that, who they manipulate. You know, and this, the world sees this. Like, their claims have no power anymore in regard to Zionists lying about racism and so on. It has fallen apart, you know, and this is why it's so important that we keep pushing on this story because it, I mean, there's people that have pointed this early on and said that this.

And I made a somewhat point about how long we would talk about what this is. And I believe it's going to go on for centuries, at the very least. It's a very huge moment for what this, you know, assuming it goes in the right direction where the world will be different forever because we'll finally get to see what they've been doing in so many ways around the. world and that's going to have a major changing point you know it's it just it's a very important time for us to stick to our principles to put a point point on it you know i really think so but let's let's let's talk let's talk about the iran overlap to that since you're already you're already pointing to that as well because right now obviously israel is now you know it what is it six different fronts currently involved with bombing multiple countries five at the very least um this is what don't

Trump put out, well, this overlaps with his going into the Iran part we'll finish with. But this is actually a real post. Candice someone shared this. She said, I legitimately had to cross-checked truth social to see if this was real. And it's real. For anyone who would like to take a deeper look into BB Net and Yahoo, check out the BB files. Which if you haven't, my God, it'll blow your mind. I mean, it is everything we've already talked about.

But this guy is hated. Is that a documentary? Yeah, it's literally. I think I've downloaded that a while back when that came out. Yeah, it's wild. I mean, for one thing that jumps to my head, Miriam Adelson, for all, her power and the family and the money behind them is, is on leaked video saying if I say the wrong things,

that he'll kill her, that they'll kill me, you know, and with no, no humor. I mean, and there's so many different points that all these people like lying and trying to cover up and nobody likes him.

Everybody in every, even right now they're trying to get removed and Trump's now trying to defend him saying it's terrible. I saw that. So here's the same kind of sentiment. He says, I was shocked to hear that the state of Israel. By the way,

we can't see your screen right now. Oh, oh, thank you. Thank you. Either way, it's just a post from true social. It says, I was shocked to hear, and here, just so you can see it. This is what Candace Owens was saying first.

I was shocked to hear that the state of Israel, which had just had one of its greatest moments in history. I mean, I'm even sure what he's, it's crazy. What was he mean? The bombing of Iran. And it says, and is strongly led by Netanyahu is continuing its ridiculous witch hunt. Like, I'm against, against Netanyahu. You know, all the evidence they have, multiple indictments, all the different people,

and indictments aren't proof, but the evidence is unreal. and all the different times. The only reason not in prison is because he started all these different wars. Even Heretz will tell you that. And just goes on to basically say, you know, say, where it says, BB and I just went through hell together

fighting a very tough, brilliant, long-time enemy of Israel, Iran, by what, bombing them a few times? He's so bombastic and hyperbolic. Stronger is love for the incredible Holy Land. I mean, you get the point of it. I don't read it all. But that's calling from the pardon him.

You know, it's just, I agree. It's insane for him to come out and say it's now. So what he first, actually, Just on that one tweet, what's your take on that? Does that suggest you that he's compromised or that he just is that far supporting them? I mean, how do you say this? Well, what he knows his base thinks about this guy. I just think Trump is full of shit.

I mean, there's just no other way to put it. I mean, like, I saw that same post from truth social going around and some of the reporting on it. And yeah, I mean, I had the same reaction. Like, what universe is this guy living in? Like, even, like you said, his own base isn't fans of Netanyahu. and they're having to twist themselves into, you know, knots and use mental gymnastics to kind of make it make sense for them. And here he is openly, you know, embracing him and claiming that he is this great hero. And you also rightfully pointed out that prior to October 2023 and this whole thing, this latest, you know, of course Israel has been massacring the Palestinians for generations now.

But October 2023, Netanyahu was already like slated for impeachment and, you know, things were rising up investigations again. him and being a wartime president, as Trump has said there, has allowed him to extend his power and kind of delay that inevitable. And now that it's happening, of course, Trump's coming to his aid and defending him. It's not surprising to me, but it does just show, I think, how, like, I've never truly understood the Trump fascination, the Trump deception. Like, I've, I've legitimately tried to, and listen to some of Trump's talks and to see, like, what is it that people are getting? And I think that for me, it plays on the lowest base human emotions. Like you said, he's bombastic.

He likes to make fun of people. Look at those stupid, you know, fake news and everybody cheers and laughs. Or the other thing, he tugs their heartstrings and like, here's this mother whose child was killed by an immigrant. You know, I'm going to stand and fight for them. The other big thing is, of course, his statements, he said multiple times that it's, they're not coming after me. They're coming after you and I'm standing in the way.

There's a lot of psychological stuff going on here that I think pulls people in. so that they identify with Trump and really kind of have this, this almost unbreakable bond. Thankfully, it is breakable and some people do wake up from it, as I've heard over recent weeks, people saying, yeah, I voted for him, but I'm regretting it, you know, this and that. But yeah, I just think that there's just, Trump doesn't have much, you know, he's not a deep philosophical thinker.

He's not a eloquent speaker. He doesn't have much to offer other than bombastic, you know, lies and playing on people's emotions. and the fact that anybody can see that and buy into it. Of course, you've got the Laura Loomers of the world and people who follow her who will love and, you know, and cheer that on. But I don't think that the majority of MAGA. I don't think that the majority of MAGA does want this relationship with Netanyahu. But the problem is, and this goes back to what we were saying earlier in the conversation, is some people are still stuck on personalities and they don't know how to kind of pull that apart and allow space in their mind of, okay, maybe I did vote for Trump.

I do think he's better than Kamala, but still, this doesn't line up with what I am fighting for. This doesn't line up with what I voted for. This doesn't line up with what I believe. In fact, it goes against it. It doesn't not only not align, but it goes right against the very principles I believe in. And you see this also with him attacking Thomas Massey. I don't agree with Thomas Massey on maybe everything in the world. And I know there's some people who have concerns about some of his connections.

But as far as politics go, he is the most principled person in the political game. Let's just say that, right? Yeah. And easily, easily. And for Trump to have such a fit and want to go after him because he's not towing the line, you know, and some of his base are buying it. And they're ready to primary him and try to get him out of office. They tried that and they didn't succeed, which I think is funny, too, to watch them fail at that.

But either way, the point is like somebody who's actually who was supportive of Trump and, you know, bought into the narrative because, okay, well, he's going to do some of these good things, Doge, et cetera, is now saying, hey, Louis, he's going to war without author. authorization, the big, the stupid bill. I'm not even going to call it what he calls it. The stupid big bill is, you know, going to add all this money to the deficit. And Massey is just speaking truth about it and Trump can't handle it. This just shows me, too, that even though people want to ignore it because I think it's just leftist TDS, Trump has an authoritarian streak.

And he, he demands obedience to him. That's what, that's the sign of an authoritarian. So it's not just leftist, mainstream media, George Soros talking points to acknowledge. that this the you can see all of the personality traits in trump that he demands allegiance and obedience and the people who don't give it um you know he's ready to toss them under the bus i mean and that's let's be clear that's actually an acknowledged point within a lot of the team sport politics hierarchy and all like you know that you don't counter signal the leader you know like i've seen these statements out there or even mary tal we just mentioned boden she she says she got

all these people in her dm saying just tone down don't say those things right now don't say it because you're hurt, you know, it's like, it's the truth, though, and you know it's the truth. And you're going to hurt the movement. Yeah, man. It's very, very clear in all this. And, you know, like I said, it is Trump first, not America first for a lot of these people. And some of them like a cat turd out there will be honest about that and say, I'll always trust Trump. And I'll always side with Trump.

It's like you're basically saying what we all laugh about, you know? It's just, it's very clear. You're proving our point. Exactly. Exactly. But so to finish on the Iran overlap to all of it, um, this, what's, this, this, this, this, this, This is a tweet from Aaron Mote. I don't know if you saw this.

I want to talk about a few things to just wrap up in general. Your thoughts about where we are with Iran and the back and forth. We don't have to go in all of it, but just whatever strikes your mind right now is interesting. And the bombing of the base in Qatar, the possibility that people were warned and they were removed. We have the sleeper sell point that I will make a point out before we wrap that I think is very interesting. Aaron said this, let me sell this Washington Post thing. Now, he says, not that we need any more confirmation, but the Washington Post reports that the Israeli-U. US attack on Iran was decided months earlier. And we've already reported this. Now, we're not taking

us a base on what Washington Post has to say. The facts they're pointing to have been confirmed in multiple ways and saying that decided months earlier that they had nothing to do with nuclear weapons, that they already decided. Even I think it was, was it Rubio, admitted that essentially after March 7th was when they had already made the decision. And it says senior Israeli officials say they already decided by March, that was the one I was referencing, to attack Iran the same month, the U.S. intel community assessed that Iran had no nuclear. clear opens program. We didn't touch on that either. The Gabbard, you know, basically saying the truth, IAEA saying the truth, Trump saying he doesn't care, and then her just lying about what

she said. It's very weird. The reason it goes on to say was that Iran would have rebuilt its air defenses by the latter half of the year, exactly, which gave Israel a unique opportunity to execute plans, carefully laid plans and years in advance to heavily damage a weakened Iran. That's what they wrote. Just to underscore the point, the choice to attack was not so much driven by new intelligence indicating an Iranian sprint for a nuclear weapon or any eminent threat to Israel, direct quote from the article. So very, very telling. But not news to you and I would imagine, but what are your thoughts? No, it's definitely not news. And yeah, there's a couple points you brought up there that I'll comment on. I mean, for one, I hadn't seen that specific post article,

but this is something that others have suspected. I've seen some reporting elsewhere, but the, for one, like you said, Gabbard, like totally flip-flopping. She shared the video where the video literally says the opposite of what she says and it's wild i think these people think that maga is stupid or that a lot of people are blind or they they're still realizing that we have the internet and we can you know pull up clips and stuff like that desperate it could be desperate yeah and and i think also though again just i'm going to hammer the point home again these people have no principles you know if they did have them they're willing to sell them out when it comes to trump and you also made a great point a couple moments ago about you see this often in in the political

world, which is the reason why I think it's it's kind of inherently set up to make people abandoned principles, because once you get in there and maybe you think you're going to do something good, but then you're not supposed to do what Thomas Massey is doing or others are doing. You're supposed to always like, you know, maybe privately you say, hey, I think I have a problem with this, but publicly, you're always supposed to praise the dear leader and say, he's right. You know, we're stand together with the party. And it's not about being, you know, doing what's right. It's not about doing what you believe in.

It's not about your principles. It's just about maintaining a united front. You know, we must look like we're all on the same page for the sake of appearance or whatever. And I think that's just completely garbage. Like if people actually had principles as Thomas Massey appears to, at least in this case, then stand on them. And I said the same thing when they put RFK in there. And I was just telling people how, you know, that they're failing on a lot of fronts. And people are like, well, Derek, if they come out too strong, it's going to do this and they're not going to succeed.

And I just feel like if you have your principles and if you've got the truth on your side, stand on that. Right. And if Tulsi Gabbard was who she claims to be this anti-war, cool surfer chick who's just one of the guy, you know, one of the cool people on our team, uh, then stand on that and stand proudly and say,

look, I, I voted for Trump. I'm happy to be a part of this cabinet. I love my position, but they're wrong on this. And I don't want to go down in history as being wrong. So I'm going to stand firm on this.

And maybe you get kicked out. Maybe they, they fire you. And at least the people see that you stood on that. But that's not what a lot of these people are capable of doing, because they have, political aspirations. We have to remember that Tulsi Gabbard also ran for president a couple times. Right. For her, this could be a leg up to be the next candidate, right? I mean,

that's typically how these people operate is they want their positions and they want to show that they held that position long and they did some great things. And now they have the experience to be the commander in chief, right? So there's that kind of angle. And then in terms of the whole sleeper cell stuff, man, I know you have something else to add to that, but just I'll just say my initial thoughts, of course, were like, be prepared for a false flag, be prepared for something going on. I was reminded of that really telling an interesting 60 minutes report. I'm sure you saw it. It was during the Lebanon Pagers thing happened when they interviewed this like

masked Israeli, Masad Asian, whatever. And he said something to the effect of like, we create the reality you guys are living in. Right. And just how much the Israeli intelligence is doing that is doing reality fabrication and and sciops around us.

And more specifically that they have the technology to blow up Pagers. in the way that that happened, we don't have time to get into it today. But for those who don't never really follow that story, it wasn't just that they like randomly hacked the pages. Like they had to track down, okay, which company and manufacturers are making the pagers that the Hesbolo is going to use. And then they infected the assembly line and the manufacturing. So then they could track them. And they were tracking them for months, just waiting for the right time to blow them up. So they could do the same thing in the U.S. if they wanted to. They could do some false flag.

They could have, you know, Israeli sleeper cells go out and do something. And of course, there's always the possibility that they just stage a cyber attack and then blame it on Iran. They've already seen this. And we saw this after the fact with the alleged assassination attempt in Butler, where they started trying to say that it was somehow related to Iran. And that didn't really catch on. I did some reporting too. I was reviewing it recently. Right before the election, there was like this, you know, intelligence out there that Iran may try to hack the U.S.

election. and they never really made anything of it, but it was like they're already steeding people's minds with that idea. And so when you put that into full context, they have this whole record they can now look back and be like, well, we know Iran was involved in the assassination. We know they tried to hack the election and kind of build up this narrative that they've been trying to get into us.

And now this is just the latest response, and it's in response to our beautiful bombing of that country that we all know as part of the axis of evil that George Bush told us about after 9-11. It's like this long game. One other point on that, I reported this on my show last night that I found really, really odd, I don't know, interesting that General Wesley Clark, who you know and both of our audiences know, was the man who said

about the going into five nations or seven nations in five years at post 9-11, including, he said, ending with Iran. Well, now he's on MSNBC sharing this sleeper cells propaganda, which I thought was just really interesting. It's like, this is the guy warning us about the plan, which we've all seen play out with them going to Syria, Iraq, Afghanistan, you know, bombing in Somalia, bombing these other countries, Yemen, getting control of that through Saudi Arabia, and then now going after Iran. And now here he is on MSNBC spreading propaganda about sleeper cells. And maybe he knows something we don't.

And maybe that is a real threat. And we're just kind of being naive here. But I find it very suspicious that it's like the same guy who told us about this plan is now out there saying that we need to be careful because Iranian sleeper cells are hiding in our bushes. Right. Well, I doubt either of us would ever doubt the possibility or ever in a blindly disregard that it could be happening. Like, you know, what we want are facts, not insinuations from intelligence that lies more often than not, you know.

So the idea that there's any kind of a sleeper self from any government is obviously something that could exist. But whether, you know, Israelis are doing that in your point about the major attack, there's more evidence to that effect than anything I've ever seen in my life. And the idea of whether, you know, tacking or deploying things that's sitting there for years as they would argue, you know, and then executing that killing, or I think it was hurting 75% of it was women and children. You know, it's horrific stuff. But the possibility, or as you said, you know, they said the, you know, the world is our stage or something like that. And you said

what you said, the second part, where they're admitting to. Yeah, they say we're creating reality for you and you're just existing in it or something. Yeah. Like so the paraphrasing. So they're basically saying, you know, we dictate anywhere or the different times, the conness it and people in, you know, as their Congress, for those that don't know the term for in Israel openly say that we can legislate anywhere in the world. International law does not bind us. And that's very real. Many times that's been stated.

All these things in the context show you that that's very possible. Back to the point about the Iran dynamic, we shouldn't disregard whether Iran could do that. But the question is to what end? That isn't, if there is no provable end or intention, that still doesn't mean it's not possible. But ask why that would make sense. Okay. So then if it's happening, right?

So we have people in this country, then we should start looking for facts. because what's interesting to me is at the time I've never seen more of an interest from Israel, the United States to get you thinking something like that's happening, that we start seeing all the DC Dranos and sorters and all the rest just floating out fact-free nonsense about sleeper cells, Holman putting out things about sleeper, not back, just going Biden let people in, so Iran sleeper cells,

like that being the biggest basic argument. And that fits right into the two-party narrative of like, well, it's Biden's fault because of his stupid border policy, he led on these Iranian sleeper cells, and then that plays right into the current propaganda. Right. So again, question all of this. Be worried,

but don't jump into any reactionary situation with, you know, there's plenty of false flag dynamics. I'll just include this that I thought was it. This is what I was going to just point to. I think this is just interesting. Certainly could just be the inadequacy of the Iranian Revolutionary Guard. I don't know. But here's what, here's the post.

It says, ICE arrest 11 Iranian illegal aliens over the weekend, including alleged Iranian army sniper of Karimi. he was carrying in his Islamic Republic of Army ID. And I simply said, because it's customary for the sleeper cell operatives to carry Iranian military identification. I just thought that was a little bit interesting. But my point is-

It feels like 9-11 in the passports. Yes, right, a little bit too convenient. But no, certainly possible. My point, though, is that if you really look at the story, there's only two of them that they argue have any real potential concern, but not enough for them to even be, like, other than maybe the current political overview of the immigration thing, like these people wouldn't be able to necessarily be declined entry to the country. The point is that if you look at all of them, it very well could just be Iranians who are here,

who are immigrants, you know, we're now being arrested. Now, I don't know. My point is I don't have any other evidence other than insinuations from people who have been caught lying a hundred times just since they've been put in position, you know. So it's very interesting. And who have an incentive to lie and push their propaganda. They have an incentive to keep people afraid. And just one last point I'll make on that is, and maybe this is an example of it with

this catching of these 11 men here. but you know where's palinter where's um clear view AI you're telling me this massive surveillance state we have can't locate these alleged super cells that are just hiding everywhere right or if they can't that's more of their reason to justify why they need to look closer and scan more and can you know it's all this self-fulfilling prophecy but yeah the point is just to keep you know be quite skeptical to so discernment i'll include this at the end as well this was a very this just adds more to my very clear concern that was to watch this show you already know about this this for Derek you might have seen this this many different many large 100,000 follower Patriot MAGA accounts

came out with this. Iranian National was let into the country under Biden who says soon you will know who I am. Remember the story? It's this guy. He did come in. He did say that. Now the video they don't include is where he says he's Palestinian. That's why they cut it out.

But he wasn't Palestinian either. This came out at the time when they were trying to convince you that Palestinian Hamas were going to sneak into the border, right? Well, we covered this in January 2024 when the same Gryfters told you who is Palestinian. He's proven to be a work. He worked for Assad. He was arrested by Egypt charged him as working for Mossad. And here's the actual article. So I'm to go through it all again.

You guys can check it out. But what's funny is I cover this at the time. The guy who they want you to, the guy in the border, this guy, they wanted you to think it was this guy. That's the one they claimed it was. This guy, at the time this guy was crossed the border, is like 30 years older. And he has a channel and you can prove it. And so they are trying to make him in to be this Islamic terrorist.

The reality is you can prove based on many different facts. actors I did in the show that he's actually the guy that got accused of working for Assad, was arrested, and somehow ended up on our border claiming he was a Palestinian when that was the interest. And now suddenly it's being claimed to be an Iranian. You know what I mean? And it's like, so these things just scream that we're being manipulated into a certain situation, you know, but still consider everything else, you know, but check out the show for those don't know. The evidence is very clear. It's striking. But so, you know, end with where you think this might go, brother. Any of the comments you were going to make there.

Yeah, I mean, I just want to say thanks for all the work you put in, man. because I think that those, even though those are like small little details sometimes and they get lost in the just the sauce of so many other things happening, I try to hold on to those types of stories because those are the kind of things that that little detail, right, as you showed there with Patriot, whoever sharing it, gets shared millions of times and it repeated. And then that gets picked up and shown in other videos and then TikTok videos. And then people carry that knowledge and they think, oh, wait, I remember that one time, this Iranian, blah, blah, whatever. And even just being able to catch those lies, whether it was intentional or it just, you know, people, in a hysteria rush to, you know, prove their point. Having those little examples to pull up are so important because it can help debunk other

things where we can show people, look, no, that actually wasn't what they told you that it was. And so then that should call into question the entire narrative that you've bought into. So thanks for, you know, just the tireless work that you do trying to keep up with these daily breakdowns. Yeah, I just want to encourage everybody, as I have been doing that, ultimately, like, don't fall into the fear of propaganda. World War III, maybe it's going to happen. Maybe it's not. I put a poll up the other day on social media asking people's thoughts, like how many of you actually believe that the, say, the Western block of Israel, U.S., U.S., U.K., 12-I's nations, five-eyes, et cetera, and the Iranians, the Russians, the Chinese, North Korea, how many people truly believe that they

do not get along? And some people seem to believe it's all a charade and there's, you know, no disagreements and they're hanging out, sipping champagne behind the scenes. I think that there's some version of that. I think these people tend to have ideological and cultural differences that do exist and sometimes might create real world conflict. But I always try to remind people to that at the end of the day, 99 times out of 100,

the predator class are going to work with each other. They're going to agree with each other. And I stand with the Israeli people who are just fighting for freedom. And the Palestinian people, of course, not the people who bought into propaganda and want the Palestinians dead or the people who are vice versa, you know, the American people, the Iranian people who are just trying to live their lives. I don't stand with or support the Iranian government or the Israeli government or the U.S. government and on and on and on.

And I think that is the worst part is that when these conflicts happen, even just this bombing back and forth for 12 days or whatever, you know, they're calling it now, the 12-day war. The ceasefire obviously hasn't held. Real people are dying. Like real people are dying and innocent people are being caught up in the mix. that is what I try to remember and hold on to. We should remain skeptical. We should continue to try to decipher things.

And yes, it's probably a good idea to have some food stored away or to kind of have a plan for whatever good it might do for hard times ahead. But don't buy into the propaganda and remember that the system and these people who run it, they want us hating the other, whether that's the Israelis or the Jews or the Iranians or whatever. And at the same time, sure, there are some Iranians that chant death to him. America, you don't have to embrace that to understand they have good reason to feel that way. American policy for the last 70 years in their countries, interfering, intervening in the Middle East,

military intervention, intervention, false flags. You know, all that stuff does is breed new terrorists. You know, it breeds new people who rightfully or wrongfully feel like they want to get vengeance for what happened to their families and to their, you know, their children. And that's a big part of the problem, you know, the U.S. war machine is creating this feedback loop of people who want to respond and want to react. And then what do we do? We call them terrorists.

And then we want to send more bombs and more soldiers and things like that. And so just remember that, that there are real humans involved in this. And we should do our best not to get lost in the war propaganda because it's ramping back up like post 9-11 again. Well, you're here, man. Great, great point to end on. And I think it's, you know, here to the first part about calling it out and definitely agree

that that is, you know, at least the propaganda is ramping up. And, you know, I think that we've been in a state of multi, multi-nation war for a long time, whatever you want to call that. But what we're worried about is the collective kind of shove into both the like propagandized acknowledgement of whatever you want to call World War III, because that will signify some kind of new direction, but also just the ongoing war crimes that are committed every moment we're talking right now by the people who are acting like they're trying to push peace, you know, and that goes for anybody.

You know, it is literally everywhere you look. And I think people are finally starting to find the courage to call it out. So, and thank you for all the tireless, tireless effort and work you put in as well, Derek, because it just, you know, it's, it is a never ending job, as you know, and it's never, you know, it never feels like you're doing enough, but it's like we have to just keep pushing because, you know, I really do genuinely think we make a difference with everything that we do. And I mean, talking about everybody out there doing it. You reach people.

Don't forget that. And I'll leave. Thank you, brother. Thanks for having me on, man. As all, yeah, always, ma'am, I really do appreciate our conversations. I really find it. We, we always, you know, I think we help more people to kind of put, put things in place, myself included, you know, when we kind of overlap ideas.

I'll end with a video from the Army about the whole Sciop dynamic. Don't not forget the argument of the world's a stage, like they're all actors in our play, kind of a sentiment from the Israeli intelligence. Well, our Army or just the U.S. intelligence also has a very similar view about how the world plays out and think about how this view might reflect on everything else we discussed today. So thank you, Derek. Any of us give a shout out before we go. No, just, you know, thank you for having me on.

I will be releasing the next final episodes of the Pyramid of Power very soon. So for those who are looking out for that, stay tuned. Thanks for everybody who's been supporting. And stay tuned for more of my work at theconsciousresistance.com. And Last America, Bagvon, we're not going away from that just yet. We have plenty more articles coming your way. I'm determined about that, as well as the fluoride follow-up coming up your way. Absolutely.

Thank you. As always, everybody out there question, everything come to your own conclusions. Stay vigilant. There is another very important phase of warfare. It has as its target, not the body, but the mind of the enemy. The target of psychological warfare is against the enemy's mind.

It is words and ideas. Ammunition used by cywar. Its mission is to influence the thoughts of the enemy soldiers. And at the same time, is expected and encouraged to study foreign languages and the social sciences such as history, economics, and sociology. He must have a broad and sympathetic understanding

of all phases of human experience. Gripping at my skin, the walls of night closing. But the use of this force as an integral part of combat has now taken on new form. These are the Cy War soldiers.