The Last American Vagabond - Dissolution Of Informed Consent, Zionism Is Racism & Israel Loses Control Of Oct. 7 Narrative In Israel

Episode Date: January 25, 2024

Welcome to The Daily Wrap Up, a concise show dedicated to bringing you the most relevant independent news, as we see it, from the last 24 hours (1/25/24).As always, take the information discussed in the video below and research it for yourself, and come to your own conclusions. Anyone telling you what the truth is, or claiming they have the answer, is likely leading you astray, for one reason or another. Stay Vigilant.!function(r,u,m,b,l,e){r._Rumble=b,r[b]||(r[b]=function(){(r[b]._=r[b]._||[]).push(arguments);if(r[b]._.length==1){l=u.createElement(m),e=u.getElementsByTagName(m)[0],l.async=1,l.src="https://rumble.com/embedJS/u2q643"+(arguments[1].video?'.'+arguments[1].video:'')+"/?url="+encodeURIComponent(location.href)+"&args="+encodeURIComponent(JSON.stringify([].slice.apply(arguments))),e.parentNode.insertBefore(l,e)}})}(window, document, "script", "Rumble"); Rumble("play", {"video":"v46p3ef","div":"rumble_v46p3ef"});TLAV Music:https://soundcloud.com/the-last-american-vagabondMoney Game Video:https://www.thelastamericanvagabond.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/Money-Game-HB.mp4 Bitcoin Donations Are Appreciated:www.thelastamericanvagabond.com/bitcoin-donation(3FSozj9gQ1UniHvEiRmkPnXzHSVMc68U9f) Get full access to The Last American Vagabond Substack at tlavagabond.substack.com/subscribe

Zionism is racism. Israel cannot be both. Israel is either a racist, Jewish state, or it's a democratic state for everybody. And that's what I would like Israel to be. I'd like a democratic solution, one state with equal rights for all its inhabitants. Your organization, Human Rights Watch, issued a report last year about Israel and the conclusion was it is an apartheid state. And there are four major human rights groups in the last two years who issued similar reports, which is the same conclusion, Israel is an apartheid state. So apartheid is racism. Apartite is discrimination. But Israel is the only member of the United Nations that I know, which is officially racist. And I say this because of the July 2018 nation state law, which says the Jews have a unique, unique right to self-determination in Israel. Unique means exclusive.

It means Arabs have no right to self-determination. It means even if Aras became a majority, they would still have no right to self-determination. So most certainly, Zionism is a racist ideology, and it is largely responsible for the Anakba that has unfolded throughout the last century and continues today. Welcome to the Daily Rapper, a concise show dedicated to bringing you the most relevant, independent news as we see it from the last. 24 hours. Thursday, January 25th,

2024, thank you for joining me today. I've got a big show, a lot to get into, and it's got to be a long one. So stay, so get buckled in. We have a whole bunch to cover today. Definitely going to get into the larger conversation, Gaza, Israel, and an important element of that, which I've touched on, discussed more than once,

but specifically going over the UN resolution that, you know, democratic process voted. and the vast majority of the entire body voted that Zionism is racism 20 plus years ago. Of course, that was voted later down the line and changed. It's a, you know, flowing process. But the point is that on the record, this was established and upheld for a very long time. And, you know, it's just incredible that we can still have these kind of debates. And now the world is becoming acutely aware of the lies that have been told.

We're going to talk about that early on the show today, but we're going to start with an important conversation about informed consent, something that Josh Walcos put out that we've been discussing and kind of going over the illusions around the way they play with informed consent. But I wasn't aware of this. He recently covered a document that was put forward, HHS FDA, at December of last year, that came into effect this month, that quite literally argues and we'll go into it. Think of it like a gigantic loophole that they define the parameters of when they can decide when you're informed consent is just not necessary.

After what we just went through, it should alarm the hell out of you. And it overlap that with everything else we're talking about. Why would we need to ask their consent? Well, we're testing out new experimental processes. But we're also after that going to get into, and the vast majority of the show today does apply to the Israel-Gaza discussion. But we're going to talk about the Zionism point about the UN and the percent. of it and the historical proof that Zionism is a racist concept and it's an apartheid state and what that really means for the larger conversation.

Pardon me. But then we're going to get into the point of what's currently going on, the current stats. And really, I mean, it's hard. I don't even want to try to break down all the different parts. Like, I'm real, in today's show is going to be important for if you're not caught up on, and the inner, the different pieces of these stories from August, organ's theft of bodies that were dug up and there are excuses around that. The 24, 21, 24 plus people they claim were killed in regard to the detonation of their own,

which they won't tell you, but their own deployment of controlled demolition devices in order to bring down civilian infrastructure, documents, and articles in Israeli media that have come out, that have exposed that that is what they were doing, and in many cases took down entire blocks without any justification. I mean, it's coming out left and right, which was one of the ways I framed all of this latter part the show. In an interesting way, you can see very clearly, and this one video comes to mind, that they've lost control of the narrative in Israel. And this has been going on for a long time. I mean, again, I wrote an article, or rather titled my show, I think, what, a week into this

conversation post-October 7th, that Israel has already lost control of the narrative. I'm clearly correct on that. It wasn't hard to see. Many of us noticed that. But today, I can see very clearly that they've lost control of this from within. And I'm not just talking about the families of the hostages who have been screaming that they don't care about their family members from the very earliest points of this. And they still are, your media and your government act like they don't matter or rather they don't exist and call you racist

for not going along with what their government wants to do while their people and those families are telling you the same thing that we're telling you. But a bigger point. The corporate media, the different even kind of quasi-corporate media outlets They're now beginning to open conversations about the Hannibal Directive, about the fact that they were lied to about some of the most egregious, if not all of the most egregious propaganda, 40 beheaded babies,

the rape allegations. They're having these conversations on news desks in corporate Israeli media. I mean, think about how wild that is. Our media hasn't even uttered the word Hannibal Directive, as far as I can tell, and showing you that they've lost this. So their people are now beginning becoming very aware that not only were they lied to about all of the things they thought they were fighting back against, for the most part, including the fact that Israel's been funding Hamas.

This is all coming out. But on top of that, that they are actively what appears to be trying to kill their own people to cover up what's going on. And this is not what I, you know I agree with this, but this is what they're discussing and their people are putting forward in regard to Israelis, not just Jews, but Israelis in general. And it's really powerful to see. Now, we're also going to talk about the U.S. perspective of this and how. how embarrassing it is that they're trying to act like we're not at war with anybody, and we're going to get into the basic definition of war and how insulting it is that they play

these games and how that overlaps the larger conversation of foreign policy in Yemen and China as well. But the hostage situation will focus on toward the end in regard to Qatar and Egypt and how that's shifting dynamic is exposing everything, the humanitarian aid, continuing to be shown to be held up by Israel and even Egypt is now standing up and saying how dare you claim we're doing any of this, and you can show all the lines of, you can show them cheering, and even Mossad put a tweet out, praising the Israelis that blocked the aid. So it's very clear that they are speaking out of multiple sides of their mouth here, and it's

being caught by everybody. It's an important conversation to see how much this changed and how many people are beginning to at the very least question things they've never thought they were even allowed to question as if there's anybody telling you what you can and can't question, or they are telling you that, whether there's anybody who can truly stop you from questioning what you want. My point is there's people that go along with those things, and they're finally starting to go, I don't know about this. Maybe Zionism is racism.

Maybe these people are what we've been hearing. And thank God, because you know what? They are. And it's finally coming out. And it's not about religion. It's not about anything other than actions by powerful people who put the less powerful under their boot for whatever the hell they want to achieve. So let's start today with the illusion of free speech.

on the platform that's always been, everyone's screaming about the savior of free speech, Elon Musk. Well, here's another example of how that's working out. Max Egan, how I'm sure you're all familiar with. If not, make sure you check out his work. I believe it's the Crow House was apparently censored. So much free speech on this platform, it's almost overwhelming. Here is his account. And this is not one of those he's been kicked out, can't access it.

But this is, his account's been suspended. And now, and look, he's someone who I respect for the fact. that whether I agree with them or not on everything he's talking about, he says what he thinks. He does not, and that's, there's very few people like that, and I count myself among them that do not care about censorship in that regard.

I will say what I think on any platform with anybody talking to me, because we all should do that, because I believe, not because I think it's bombastic, but because I believe in what I'm saying, and they just happen to not like that truth. And I see it that way, but however you want to see it,

my point is I believe in what I'm saying, and I stand by it. He is similar than that. He's exactly like that. He'll tell you what he's thinking and it can be contentious sometimes. Good. Not for Twitter, though. Not in the free speech bastion.

They can't accept that. Obviously, you know what this is about. Max has been going to town calling people out about their lies around Israel, doing some of the things that I've been doing much more as far as I can tell. Underneath Eli David and Eli Levy and saying, you guys are lying and here's how I can tell. They don't like that, clearly. And you're going to see this more and more as we go forward. I mean, even, like, I decided to even touch on it because I don't find it as relevant as many other things that are happening.

But Elon and Ben Shapiro just did their ridiculous tour about acting like that as anything to do with what they're doing to people in Palestine right now and acting like that's all that matters is all this historical pain and the October 7th day that happened, which of course, there were crimes and we should care about that. But while they're pointing over here, they're outraged that anybody goes, what about the genocide that's happening? What about the 32,000 people who have been killed over here? you're a racist, you hate Jews. That's the dynamic that's happening and they're losing because that's not working for people. But nonetheless, Elon toes the line, goes along with the whole thing. Or doesn't realize that he's being used. You know, you guys can decide for yourselves.

But I want to show you how ridiculous this game is. Here's what he just put out on the 23rd, stating, you know, oh my God, if the Irish, Ireland Prime Minister decides to pass a law about hate speech, we can't just go along with that terrible. You mean like exactly like you guys are doing on Twitter, safeguarding information, independence, and combating hate speech? I mean, what's the difference here? Because he's a person in position of political power who is able to pass a law that people, that's sure a difference. But you're criticizing him under the argument that should that happen, it's unjustified. Well, what's the difference between a massive power behind Twitter censoring and choosing not to or, you know, dictating what is and is not around this completely benign.

The idea that hate speech is just words. There's no laws that say you can't say certain things. It's all about feelings and uncomfortable concepts where people feeling they're upset or feeling outraged or feeling insulted. Quite frankly, I don't care. If you guys are at the point in your lives where people's mean words, mean enough to you to try to censor everybody's speech, you're a maniac. I can stand right beside you and say,

these people are disgusting. What their ideas make me sick, but they have a right to express them. We used to understand what free speech actually meant in this country, let alone on a platform or anywhere else. Now look, yes, Twitter, of course, could, as a private company, can do whatever it wants, but then don't stand up and pretend that you fight for something that you can prove you're not fighting for, a la, max, or any other example you could put forward. Now, here's another one.

This just happened on Twitter. She says, I went from hate to violent speech. Now, do you see violence? Here's what it says. We've gotten these before. where you say something that's completely benign and they just don't like it so it becomes violent speech or what, you know,

your words end up making other people do X, Y, and Z. They are at this point, it is, it is the exact problem in a very different way that we had on the last Twitter. In fact, I keep saying this. It feels much more surreptitious and alarming than the blunt censorship that you got

before. This is social engineering we're watching play out. But I said this post was detected by our systems and it's been visibly limited. We've determined that your post violates our rules against violent speech. Again, before they just said it was hate speech, which proves to yet again, which we should need to prove that they're absolutely censoring what they deemed to be hate speech. And yet he stands up and makes a big statement about what Ireland's going to do. How disingenuous. But the point is, this is what it says for the podcast.

I do not, in all capitals, condemn Hamas. Hashtag heroes. Okay, you could disagree with that. I quite frankly would condemn many things Hamas carried out on October 7th and many things they did before. Of course, you have to bring into the context that they were funded by Israel. that they've been bolstered and supported by Western powers to use them against the Palestinian state. But none of that seems to matter for the conversation.

Nonetheless, I don't care if this was ISIS. You're telling or whatever you see as the, you know, again, you know, funded by West, of course, and controlled and used, same difference. But I don't care whatever you think is the worst group out there. Does she not have a right to say, I don't want to condemn them? I don't agree. In fact, I like what they do. How is that against the law?

How is that censorship worthy? How is that violent speech? because the people you don't condemn do violent things, therefore in some backward abstract way, you're promoting their, I mean, my God, this is control over what you can think. These are thought crimes. Free speech, guys, let's all praise him for the free speech bastion he's created, right? Well, here's another interesting point. This is Chris.

He's a community notes contributor, whatever that really means. But there's a lot of these groups, these people, and his account is 44,000. Now, what he's telling you here is important. And he says, let's talk about community notes. He goes, I'm one of them, basically. What I'm seeing is a direct attempt to silence, sensor, deprioritize, demonetize, isolate, and cast doubt against anyone that questions the current plans of the governments.

Big pharmaceuticals, parasitic ruling class. Think about that. This is a person who's doing this, and he can see what he, and he's breaking down for you with videos and everything else, that this is being controlled largely by a few entities with a lot of influence that he can prove, in his opinion, are not human because of the amount of conduct. So we're watching AI and different things, probably stemming from exactly who you might think right now, and, you know, just multiple entities I would point out, but in this kind of dictating the free speech,

hate speech dynamic that are actively keeping this going. Now it says enterprising Desert Raven, which is one of the names he highlights in this, one of these accounts, is the username for a single single. community notes contributor. Since joining community notes in March of 20203, it has posted nearly 5,000 community notes. A bot, he asks, a group of paid agenda activists or three-letter agencies, none of which should really be allowed in the way that Elon acts like this works today. One thing is for sure he writes, in my opinion, and it's impossible to be a single person. It is posting over 70 community notes per day, every day, seven days a week without rest. Hardly.

I mean, do you have a job? These notes have to be backed up with linked supporting evidence. It's just not possible in his opinion to achieve this on a daily basis. No, look, I'm sure somebody could do it and work even at the same time. If they just happen to make every moment count, but the point is it's highly unlikely. It says this is a relentless attack on anyone that dares to question the things that have happened to us or the plans they have in place for humanity. Community notes works on a basis that when a contributor sees a post and wishes to correct that post, They create a note that provides them information and links to data with support their note.

Now, that doesn't just go live, right? It says when enough, so we're told anyway, when enough, one more thing, I would be willing to bet you that there's obviously a way that if Elon or somebody in power wanted to make it happen, they could. But it says when enough contributors approve the note that this individual have put up with their supporting evidence, it then goes live. If contributors don't agree with the note, they state why they can add counter information. This all happened behind the scenes. It's then not published, but left pending unless other contributors, then agree with the original note and so on. I find that important to understand how at least they claim that it works.

Attached to the video of all the community notes that Desert Raven has added, both published and pending in just the last 10 days. It'll blow your mind. This is from within the community notes section, so you'll not normally get to see this. The vast majority of these notes are impending waiting to go live. The video goes on forever, and it's only the last 10 days worth.

Impossible for a single user to grade, he argues. There's no doubt that you will know someone in these videos, and you will. You'll notice the recurring themes. They protect jabs, big pharma, current government regimes, which includes Israel, climate change, world economic forum stuff. Isn't that interesting? Big surprise, because Elon's totally not overlapped with all of that stuff, right? Anyone that questions what's going on that has a large follower base appears to be targeted, especially blue ticks. The community notes that have been approved all appear to be supported by the same group of contributors. This is really bad,

extremely concerning. Yeah. He says, I will individually contact to every single person that has had an attempt to depopularize their post in this video. Of course, he tags Elon. It's kind of shocking that we can't wrap our minds around the way. He's aware of this, guys. He has to be. You urgently need to do a complete audit of community notes. Or, I mean, you could argue that it's just a benign, like lack of concern, just let it happen the way it happened.

It doesn't care. Either way, he's still responsible for this, or Yakorino, however you want to look at it. They are either bots, groups, bad actors, and so on. Now, here's what interesting. he says IP and Mac address, his access would easily identify this. Well, what do you know? So you can look at this one of two ways. This is either a real attempt by an individual to go, hey, there's a problem here,

and it's not as real as you think it is. Or it's a lie manufactured to justify getting more personal information from you to pretend to fight a problem that's not there. Or it is a real problem, and they're trying to use that real problem to get your personal information, and that problem will probably never go away because they're probably making that happen problem reaction solution all these are certainly possible either way it seems the solution becomes no more anonymity and it all goes away i just feel that does not i'm not trying to say this person knowingly is doing that but it feels very suspicious to me now you can watch this video it's crazy it's

30 minutes long i mean it just goes on forever and every single one of these things of course twitter freezes a terrible platform right now it is unreal and you can look at all this stuff you should take a minute to look through it my point is that we cannot trust this stuff guys we are not being told the truth so let's go actually before we get into the informed consent I've been putting some some effort into getting some more posts out on the substack I recently put up one of our recent oh here let me this is this is the one from taylor's recent interview we keep putting out clips we have a bunch more to come out which is called dissect dissection of the aorta a rare heart condition observed in COVID-19 injected patients another one coming

out in a couple of days in regard to the sperm aspect of the spike protein and so on. I just put up one of the clips that we did in regard to the brain virus, the GM nanoparticles. We put out the clip about the appeal discussion and so on. So more coming your way. Make sure you check that out. You'd like to support us on substack. Obviously, this is a good way to support the platform. And it's a, you know, you get all the basically the ability to comment on these things.

Everything's free. As I told you, it always would be. but we do get the monthly chats and so on. Like you get the Zoom meetings with just me every month essentially. And I'm thinking I'm trying to find some more ways to find this to be, you know, to give you benefits and so on. But really the point is always,

everything's out there. You know that we put it out for free. If you want to support us through this platform, it's just a way for you to support this TLAB in general. Like on Subsubscribesar, for example, where you can sign up even though that content is free elsewhere. It's behind paywall.

So you can choose to support us through that if you'd like, like Rockfin and so on. But we need your support, as always. So check it out. There's going to be a lot more coming out through Substack in general. Oh, and by the way, we have a Pirate Stream episode coming up soon. At this point, as you guys know, it'll be just Courtney and myself. And it looks like Catherine Austin Fitz might be joining as our third mic.

We have a lot of guests lined up for the third chair in general. I think we're kind of going to leave it that way for now. But keep an eye out for that. Now, this is something I was recently sent. And this is just, we actually just talked about this. But I wanted to make sure you saw just how real this stuff is and how concerning what they're stating in this is based on the fact that this is a failed concept. The whole damn thing. And I should just grab this to begin with.

But this is the one that Dr. Fauci put out that literally says that this has failed, right? Rethinking the next generation. And if you read the whole thing, it's very clear that, you know, we have to stand back and reevaluate because it didn't work. We have to find a way to get the mucosal immunity, blah, blah, blah. We're talking platform-style MRI injections. This is what it's about. So I'll include that. So you can see that they are openly saying it didn't work.

And we damn well know that by now as people are wildly suffering around the world because these shots are still being given. But this is the next step. Or really what I argue was already there. In fact, the original Pfizer shot was labeled as self-amplifying. But now they're coming out with this as the next step. safety and immunogenicity of specifically the title for at the moment is VLP-C-OV-O-2, a SARS-C-OB-2 self-amplifying RNA vaccine with, guess what, not N1-Methyl pseudoridine modified RNA, but a modified base of 5 methyl cytosine as opposed to the methyl suitorium.

And you know why? It says it right in the article because we have too many adverse events. You mean you're completely telling us out. outwardly anywhere else that everything's safe and effective. But then you try to make a whole new one. Why? Because we have too many adverse events. But if you ask elsewhere, but no, we're all fine, safe and effective.

But your whole justification is that it's not working. Like, just realize how like invest, like intertwined with this system is inherent dishonesty. They know that they're hurting people what they're giving. They're still doing it anyway. Let's say it more specifically. The people involved with these shots and doing this scientific research seem to be acutely aware that these things are hurting people. no one seems to want to stop that and they state why they're making this new one is to alleviate those adverse events and we're trying something different to do so this is from the 22nd of this

month first in human study of SA self amplifying RNA COVID-19 vaccine and it's not organic natural it's or it's the S-A RNA which is like the mod RNA right so we're talking about again the five methyl cytosine modified RNA now it says with the modified base five methyl methyl cytosine, incorporated of five methyl cytosine to reduce the magnitude and frequency of your adverse events. You know, otherwise totally not happening at all, but we're going to make this so it stops those things that aren't happening. Robust induction of antibody responses.

So again, just like I showed you in the recent shot they're pushing, there's no correlation of protection. We have no clue if this massive response you're seeing has anything to do with what you're currently trying to protect yourself from or that we tell you this is to protect you from. We just go, well, it's got a hell of an anybody response or the right ones. We'll find out, won't we? Clearly they're not, especially when you realize that they're aiming what was the one we talked about, the malaria or the Ebola shot.

They're aiming it at very specific strains. So I guess you just got to hope that that's the thing that comes along if you think those are there anyway. It says continuing emergence of variance of concern. Are you concerned? They seem to keep pointing at these things that are drifting into the background of being totally benign essentially with more transmissibility, if that's even what's actually happening. That's their narrative even, and yet they still argue more of these things are happening,

which, what are they doing? Reducing vaccine efficacy. Oh, so the new things that are coming out today are reducing the efficacy of a shot you got four weeks ago or a year ago? Explain that for me. No, what's happening is your body's destroyed and these new shots are being tailored to try to fix that, I guess, in some new way or get a new response. You can't pretend that the new variant that just came out is in any way affecting the efficacy of something you took already a while ago. You can argue that that doesn't effectively stop that, but it didn't effectively stop what you gave them first. It's just this game of just like constantly pushing this forward.

And now it says the VLP COV one, so there's two of them as always, and don't let's far forget how they always seem to swap one out for the other when you're not paying attention. But guess what? It's a lipid nanoparticle, encapsulated, self-amplififine, and so. RNA COVID-19 vaccine with a complete, excuse me, comparable immune response to BNT162B2, the one, by the way, that was labeled as self-amplifying when it first came out. Comparable immune response. Well, I don't want anything comparable to that dangerous, deadly shot they gave everybody,

but it doesn't even say about safety or efficacy. It just simply says comparable immune response. So you got this many antibodies. Is it for the right thing? I guess we'll find out. Don't worry about antibody-dependent enhancement or any number of other issues, which, by the way, we'll point that yet again,

they've told you about. The idea that informed consent needs to be told that you need to be aware of the fact that these things very well can cause antibody-dependent enhancement, but they never told you that. It goes on to say, serum, SARS-C-O-V-2,

immunoglobulin tithers increased during the four-week post-immunization. So just making it very clear. They're giving you titers for specific responses to what, to what they're giving you. Where in this does it make clear that this, well, obviously this isn't even the right stage for that, right?

They're not in the efficacy game. But even then, we remember, they just simply do the response. So what they're telling you is, look, we got a big response. Well, I guess we'll find out whether it has any effect on what they tell you is actually happening. Now, the bigger point for me is the fact that we're talking about the continuation of giving people something that creates the spike protein. the most, I mean, obviously dangerous aspect than what we're dealing with, or the fact that it's still utilizing the MRI platform discussion, but they're adding a whole other concept,

which I'll probably have to do another deep dive on, five methyl cytosine to lower the adverse events. They tell you aren't happening. But at the same time, I guarantee that's probably, I mean, how is that not just another experiment? They're just rolling the dice out like a game of Yatzy and say, well, look, we can line it up that way. This has always been an open experiment.

And I think we're starting to see that. and a lipid nanoparticle concept is leaves the door open for everything we just discussed. Who, God only knows what else can be added to these things using nanotechnology that we've already discussed. And I'm not saying there's any evidence to that exact concept happening yet. I quite frankly feel certain that it has, but that's my personal opinion.

But we just have to recognize that that door is open. It's not hard to see how much could be done without our knowledge. And that gets in to this exact next point about informed consent, as they actively dissolve, break down, and, you know, disjoint the entire concept. And I'll show you why I use those words in particular. First, to the idea that these are failing, and they are indeed failing, if that's even the appropriate word for it, Ozzie 17 shares the fact that the Italian police unions have been sounding the alarm specifically over a surge in, you know, sudden deaths of officers

after COVID-19 ejection. Like this is being, just like the Israel conversation, this is being publicly pointed out, not just that we're baffled about deaths, but that we're baffled or rather we're concerned about post-COVID 19 shot sudden deaths of our officers. What I would, I would argue, this is just what all of them are seeing. They just have the courage to point it out. Airline pilots, I mean, all the stuff we keep seeing. Or just how about the point we should really focus on the act, just almost like a global breakdown of how many people are randomly suddenly dying at. perfect health. I mean, it's overwhelming. I broke it down in 2021 through 2022 with just athletes, as you remember, people are still only beginning to discover how big that was and use their

studies, both the FIFA study and an NIH study, to prove to you that it was astronomically more than they'd ever seen in a given year. In a perfect world, that would have been a worldwide story, but of course, not when T-Lap talks about it, but the point is, this is very clear. Here's the actual video from their account where they're telling you, alarm of sudden deaths and ill. illness with the Italian police, the number of vaccinated police officers who died suddenly is continually increasing. How do you run from something like this? It is coming out. This is the old shot. And they're pumping out the new ones. I mean, I just find that unreal. But thank you Champaign Joshi or Josh Walcos here for noticing this. And I really truly believe it's because of things

like we just saw and the ongoing experimentation that's not just about testing this shot. In my opinion, it goes much, much larger than that. And I'll actually include, the title will pop up. I'll include some of our recent shows for you to look at. But here's what he wrote. This is the Federal Register. I will go over in a second.

This is basically where this stuff gets posted. What was that? You see that pop up just now? Oh, it's that right there. Never mind. I thought there was something changing. But this is, you know, they post these things about government processes and so on.

But I'll include these for you guys to check out. Here we go. This is the one I was looking for. I'll just grab these last three that I think are important. And the question is simply, is smart dust already in use in the population? And that's an unequivocal yes. The real question is whether it is a large deployment and whether it's ubiquitous in the world. This stuff, as you watch the show, which I hope you will, goes back 2000.

I mean, this stuff's been around for decades at this point. And it's not talked about right now. And my next step question was was COVID-19, whatever that was, an attempted experimental next step. And this gets dark. This gets into stuff like internal biosurveillance, actual control over your thoughts. I mean, these are real things that are discussed in peer-reviewed science and military documents. And yet the average people will laugh it off because it's just conspiracy theory, which has just got to be one of the most ignorant phrases I've ever heard today.

But he says, just so you know, the FDA and the HHS made it so that informed consent could be waived by, what the IRBs which are the uh where was it again the institutional review board and it says the new rule wanted to affect two days ago he posted this on the twa yesterday now he included the link thank you for that he says you should really take the time to read the convoluted reasoning they employ in response to the critical comments submitted basically they say that in certain situations informed consent could eff of our plans and we have to be able to waive it as he says the standards reference in the comments emphasize the importance of voluntary informed consent for research participants, as stated in the proposed rule, obtaining conformed consent

from those who volunteer to participate in research is a fundamentally important principle of human subject protection. However, it's like the old saying, everything said before the word but doesn't mean, meaningless. There are some situations in which important research cannot practically be, practically be conducted if informed consent is required. How in the world do you possibly make sense of that? This rule permits a waiver of consent, not by the people involved, but a waiver by them without your knowledge.

And I'll show you next. In limited circumstances, consistent with the statutory amendments Congress made in the Section 3024 of the Cures Act, that's from Obama timeframe, which by the way, which was used, utilized, and allowed to continue during Trump. And same with Biden. It's never, always want to make it about one side or the other. Your government is doing this to you. That's the reality. and here's what it says institutional review board waiver or alteration of informed consent for specifically what they call minimal risk clinical investigations and I'll come back to that next.

I think it's very important to understand what that actually means the scope of that statement. There is a definition to it. Now again, this was posted, or completed the end of December, 2023. It went into effect on the 22nd of this month. It says the FDA is in. issuing a final rule to amend its regulations to implement a provision of the 21st century Cures Act, this final rule allows an exception from the requirement to obtain informed consent. So you see it's from their side.

When a clinical investigation poses no more than, quote, minimal risk to the human subject. There's a definition to what that means. And of course, the absurd part of it is they'll tell you the COVID shot is safe and effective. They'll tell you that was a, those trials are completely safe. And in effect, there's no problem. Like, they'll tell you that is within that concept. And we already see this. There's all sorts of dangerous stuff.

The FDA and the EPA and the CDC completely allowed to continue. And we're going to allow them to decide behind the scenes without your knowledge whether or not there, it necessitates that. Like, it's completely undefined. Despite the fact that it's defined, this concept has a definition. My point is, we know that they don't just go along with these things. there's going to be some political abstract concept about what they, and of course, then they can use other policies and other legislation to kind of bend those parameters, right? We see how this game, mission creep of medical freedom, when it says, goes on to say it allows the exception from the requirement of informed consent when a clinical investigation poses no more than minimal risk to the human subject and includes appropriate safeguards to protect their rights, safety and welfare. So they're omitting or rather foregoing informed consent, which is designed to safeguard your rights and safety and welfare and just saying that as long as you claim that you're doing those things and it's minimal risk, then you can just forego that.

Well, that's what that's for in the first place. I find it, I find it hard to believe that they would care about that if they forego the thing that's meant to protect that. It says the final rule permits an institutional review board, an IRB, to waive or alter, whatever alter would mean, certain informed consent, elements or that waive the requirement to obtain informed consent entirely under limited conditions, whatever that ultimately means to them. Again, that's how this is played for certain FDA regulated minimal risk clinical investigations. Now down here it says for an IRB, the review board to approve a waiver or alteration of informed consent requirements for minimal risk and clinical investigations, the rule requires that that review board find and document five criteria that are consistent

with the revised rule entitled federal policy for the protection of human substance. So all this is about experimental work or which I guess, you know, just testing on human subjects. And the fact that there's ever a dynamic or a situation where you're not, you're not given informed consent while they're testing on you. And the point is always is do you think the average people involved in these things that trust their government are even aware this exists? Because they posted it on this abstract federal registrar that nobody looks at that somehow they're going to know about this. They're not going to tell you they're not informing and giving you informed. consent. That's the whole point of not having to do it. That this is just, in my opinion, this becomes this black hole where they can argue that they didn't think this,

they thought that, and they didn't have to inform you, and then that same entity is going to back up the, this is how it's always worked as far as I can tell. These are corrupt entities. They will be corrupt. Find a document five criteria that are consistent with the revised rule. FDA believes the amendment provides appropriate safeguards. I'm sure you do, seeing as how you completely don't care about the deadly shots, you're giving people or a thousand other examples we can show where you've allowed the bad things to happen. But we totally, totally agree. Or rather what they say, we FDA believes that the appropriate safeguards will be provided in such investigations.

We're also making confirmation amendments to the FDA, conforming amendments to the FDA's regulations. So from the FDA to the HHS, that's one of the points they argue is they're trying to balance this between the two, are just removing informed consent essentially. or as I wrote, you know, the dissolution of it because it is fragmented it. It's broken down one more step away from the original concept, which is absolute, as far as I can tell. And then it makes the point. Why are they doing this? Is it for your safety? Does it alleviate some kind of block where they can otherwise do the X-1?

Not really. The only thing it removes is your understanding of what they're doing. That's what informed consent is, to the fullest extent, if they do it accurately. And why will the estimated net present value, of the cost savings they'll gain, $1.7 million. Okay, so great, you make a little extra money. Do you make money? No, the government makes money.

Right, so they can go bomb more children. Fantastic. I mean, this is absolutely outrageous to me that anybody, and are we being asked? Do they care? As Josh points out, they put up a forum where people don't even know that they can go there, where you can submit your concerns and what do they do? Disregard them and go forward anyway. Because it just sounds, it's an illusion.

And it says, we also expect benefits in the form of health care advances from minimal risk clinical investigations that would not be performed without a waiver or an alteration of informed consent. Well, then they shouldn't be performed performed. If they wouldn't have otherwise been performed, if you tell people what you're going to do, I posit that it's not supposed to be done. I think about what they're saying right there. The other benefit is that we'll get to do these experiments that we wouldn't otherwise get

to do if we had to tell them what we were doing. It looks like, this is incredible to me. It says down here on December 13, 2016, this is where it started, or this part of it anyway, the Cures Act was signed into law. So Obama's administration, and at that time even, to show you this is not new, we're just seeing the further dissolution of what's, what is important to protect your health or help protect you from them. Section 2034 into 2016 of the Cures Act amended sections, two different sections of the FDNC

Act to provide FDA with the authority to permit an exception from informed consent requirements when the proposed clinical testing poses no more than a minimal risk. So it's already been there. They've just made it even more specific. It says the rule implements the statutory change, this rule we're looking at, the statutory change by allowing an additional exception from the general requirements of informed consent. Great. So all they did, I mean, I wasn't even aware that that was even on the table.

What Josh is showing you here is them adding yet another exception, another watering down the possibility in the first place, or secondarily, I guess. So does that play into why we weren't told the truth about any other shot before this, including the COVID-19 shot? Most likely, I think that was all I had in here. So here is what this is going to make it all the more interesting. This is what a minimal risk clinical investigation is. He says often investigators refer to a clinical study as minimal risk.

risk, in quotes, while pointing to the side effects as being minor or acceptable for the given condition and or that the procedures in the study are common in medicine and rarely have severe complications. Isn't that how they describe everything under COVID-19, even though we know that's not true? My point exactly. Now, it says, while this may be valid in common terminology for clinical patient management for regulatory purposes, assuming they even care about maintaining that kind of level of scrutiny, this would not satisfy the very specific definition, which there is a definition of minimal risk as provided by the very FDA. Despite common parlance, minimal risk has a definition in the regulations.

It says the FDA defines minimal risk broadly for us in 21 CFR 30.3K, quote, minimal risk means that the probability and magnitude of harm or discomfort anticipated in the research are not greater in and of themselves than, than those ordinarily encountered in daily life. So, walking, you know, getting a sunburn, right? Like things you would encounter by being around, like minimal, minimal stuff during the performance of routine physical or psychological examination or tests.

Like they give an example, like a blood test, right? Very, very, very extremely rare that something negative will happen in something like that. Now, it says this means that the risk of the research are those that a healthy person could expect to encounter at routine clinical visits. So we're not even talking about benefits outweigh the risks here, that game they play. We're talking about like a very specific level threshold of, you know, what you, if you,

if you go in there and you have the risk of anaphylaxics, nope, doesn't count, right? That's what they're trying to say. Examples of procedures that are generally considered to meet what they call minimal risk. Blood sampling, as I said, MRI, right? Even though there's clear things that could go wrong with that, it's largely we understand to be, you know, you're not going to walk out of their, and have a blood clot or a stroke. Now, it says placement of a peripheral venous line for less than 24 hours.

Okay, so these are generally things that you can see as mostly benign. Now, examples of procedures that are not considered to be mental risk. You're going to love this. Administration of virtually any investigative drug or biologic, even if the product is approved for the indication being studied or for the indications and is known to have a generally mild safety profile and adverse events are rare. I mean, just so we're clear, this isn't at this moment applied to any specifics experiment or test or research. Well, let's remember, this goes back to 2016, so it's already been happening.

My question is what had been omitted then to now, but as we go forward, do you really believe they're not going to apply this to investigative drugs or gene therapy process or the next COVID shot? I'm willing to bet you my life that they're going to point at this and say, totally safe and effective because we're using the same platform and the same test before, even though we know that's not applicable, or that even if it is, that it's still very dangerous. Mark my words, I believe that they're going to include things just like this and argue they don't need to truly inform you. But it says as well, a clinical investigation of a device that involves invasive sampling, all of smart dust, nanotechnology, implantables, neuralink, blah, blah, blah, blah. an MRI with contrast or sedation. So they're even using one of the examples from up here. And if you simply just apply sedation, oh, too much, because there is possible risk that comes from being sedated. So think about how important that is when they argue that there's no informed consent necessary to whatever they categorize.

And how much you want to bet quietly in a year they'll alter this definition too, right? I know I'm a skeptic. I know that I am jaded against these entities. But my God, you know that with this is historically the way this. these things have gone. Either way, informed consent is not something that should just be chipped away at. It's incredible to me that was skiing to be allowed. It just shows you the runaway train that is our government. Now, this is something that we've talked about since 2020, which actually came out. This was peer-reviewed on March 2021. You've seen him mention this so many times.

Informed consent disclosure to vaccine trial subjects of risk of COVID-19 vaccines worsening clinical disease. Remember this? They never did this, but the finding was very, very clear. And I've made this point many times in regards to the terminology use, not the possible, the hypothetical, the specific and significant risk of antibody-dependent enhancement post-injection, which is what they're talking about, should have been and should be in 2020 and 2021 prominently disclosed to research subjects in the trials, those being recruited for the trials, and those receiving the shots post-approval. in order to meet the ethic standards of patient comprehension for informed consent. So was this one of these examples? Did they apply this broken logic to the COVID-19 discussion? Nobody was given informed consent. They weren't even told about the blank sheets.

The people giving these shots didn't even know about the blank inserts. And people are still not being told about this before giving these shots. So I quite frankly think this is an effect for pretty much whatever they wanted to be right now. And I did a, this is the clip version of this. The full show is right here. But as it says, the study finds, just like I told you, specific and significant risk. And it was hidden from you. They knowingly had this, even though it's on a public peer-reviewed study on the National Library of Medicine.

Now, just lastly on this, it's rare that you can see these. Like, if you just try to find like the childhood immunization schedule, it seems so convoluted and hard to find it like this. I think it was Orwell that recently sent me this. it's just mind-blowing. They've added more shots. This is the 2024 recommended, and we know that it's hardly recommended. This immediately cascades down into what's done in schools and so on. And it's crazy.

I mean, you can see just within the first year, we're talking about an RSV vaccine, hepatitis B, which I think hardly necessary. Roto virus, diphtheria. I don't even know what that one is. Hemophilis. Oh, it looks like a random influenza type, pneumonia. Polo, but polio, of course, COVID-19. At four months, they're telling you to give this four-month-old baby one or more doses of the new shot, of the COVID shot for children that have no, like, I mean, this is coming from the peer-reviewed science.

The risk is benign. It's dramatically less than the flu, and it gets the least for the people that young. And they're still adding this, which means it will still be given. So whatever we thought or know at this point as in those or what we concern ourselves about what might be, they're still forcing this in the arms of children. You think pregnant women are able to say no at this point? Like this stuff is aggressive. But then it goes further.

And still under one year, we're talking about measles, mumps rebello, the ones that we know are the ones that never been tested alongside each other, the autism overlap, the Vax conversation. But if you go up to two years, it almost doubles. I mean, this stuff is disgusting. I just, my point is not whether or not you think they're necessary that these children do not need the vast majority of what, look at other kinds of. look at other countries. Some of the things they're giving in this country are banned elsewhere.

It's staggering to me. Now, two last points that are slightly away from the vaccination conversation, but just showing you how all of this is still pushing forward, whether it's a vaccination conversation or a carbon tax or a digital ID. It's all being driven forward in a way that I see very alarmingly coming together in a control structure, which I don't need to convince anybody of. I think basically everybody sees the outlines of what that is. Some people just agree with it or don't care or politically go forward. This is the Singapore president recommending a globally coordinated effort to give people a carbon tax. I mean, this is still going forward, despite the fact that there's aggressive pushback from even at country levels all around the world. It seems that most peoples of the world don't want most of this.

And yet, they know better, don't they? There's no realistic solution to the climate transition that does not involve. a globally coordinated system of carbon taxes. There's no realistic or fair solution that does not involve a globally coordinated system of carbon taxes. And Ngozi at the WTO is coordinating this with several other international organizations. It's still early days.

There's a perception that it's unjust, it's unfair, it'll lead to inflation. In fact, quite the contrary. If we don't do this, the countries that will suffer most ultimately are the developing countries. They're going to be the worst affected by climate change. If we don't do this, it's ordinary vulnerable communities that will suffer the most. What we need is a system of carbon taxes coupled with subsidies for vulnerable

households and a stream of funding for the developing world to allow them to engage in investments in mitigation and adaptation that allows them to keep growing. And that's a real opportunity. it's a fair solution and it's the only realistic solution and we can't keep ducking it. Right. So you just decide for everybody what is the solution, right? We disagree, man. And these countries don't want you to force your digital ID on them to justify your carbon tax social credit concept. Like, it's very clear. And that's obviously getting into the point about whether carbon tax or carbon itself is even the real thing to be concerned about. As the idea, the idea that they're just going to pay their tax and continue to pollute as the largest polluters of the world, all in the, What will happen is you'll pay more for gas and drive less when you need to. I mean, that's the argument that they're going to do anything different other than just have to pay this tax, but they'll add into their, you know, it's part of doing business. They'll continue doing the same things they're doing. It's about control and the digital infrastructure around your life.

But he also said the substantization of people that need so, so you're becoming more of a debt slave in this aspect. Look, I don't care if you believe this is accurate or not? don't you think people should have a choice? I don't care whether you think that the world's going to end tomorrow. If we go to a point to where suddenly, based on your justification, that people don't no longer have choices, well, that's exactly what we've always been warning about, right? Compulsory moral bioenhancement or any of the things we've discussed,

it always comes back to that moral argument, which usually is the opposite. Now, on artificial intelligence, which is obviously a part of all of this, I just wanted to point this out. I'm sure you saw that Twitter has added this grok thing, which you can only use if you're on premium plus. No, thank you. But it's just so gross and alarming how much this is being, I mean, from my perspective, I know some people don't think this is a problem. But that this is being pushed in your face and it's being used in a way that is, it's just like the DNA concept when that was happening. People didn't realize that it wasn't just as simple as you getting some fun information.

They were utilizing your personal genetic code and information, which we still don't even fully grasp what that means at this point. well it's the same thing here this is machine learning this is the they are actively using you to learn from you what you think as well as using that to train their models i mean again i don't think that's okay but i just want to point out that on getter you know trump's platform it still says start writing and modify your content with AI just wanted you to see guys that the people on the right who are aggressively kind of like you know wef is a problem and oh this is a problem and yet trump's thing is oh it's okay because trump did it not everybody i don't even think the majority, but I just want you to see the two-party illusion, the people stuck at the core of it,

are always largely being dishonest about these things. Now, let's talk about the Zionism aspect. The concept of whether Zionism is racism and so on. I mean, this is an important discussion of the UN documents and the history around this that's very clear. Torah Judaism, which we've pointed out many times, a group that's all over the world, it's in Israel, it's in the United States, it's in the UK, and this is a group of Orthodox Jews, that scream at the top of their lungs in every possible way that Zionism is not Judaism,

and Zionism has hijacked the religion to cover what they're doing. It's exactly what I argue is happening. And it's pretty damn easy to prove, quite frankly, if you just look up the real history that doesn't come from Zionism, can manipulate concepts. And I'm talking about people that were there. People like Avi Shalom, who remembers the history who's told about his, you know, as I've played before, the, maybe I'll play it in a second,

the idea that they, that Zionists were bombing Jews in Iraq, to drive them into Israel to create state of Israel. Israel or the fact that Zionists were through terrorism attacking the British to force them to do this. And there's all these different manipulations to talk about. In this case, this is a tweet from them saying Israel sent giant bulldozers to destroy houses, farms belonging to Palestinian citizens and the Zionists now claim the land as their own. This is now, by the way, this has been going on as long far and not just post-October 7th, Zionists are deliberately pushing Palestinians away from their lands and homes and replacing them with Zionist settlers.

Why? Because it's a Zionist colonial settler project. That's what they called it themselves to look back far enough. It is inherently unconstitutional, or rather, violation of international law and racist at its core. And on top of that, if you speak up in any way about this, whether Jew or not, you get attacked by the Zionists, which show you that this is about control of a narrative. Sort of like when Ben Shapiro called Jewish Voices for Peace a bunch of trash and said that they weren't Jewish. simply because they were saying something he doesn't agree with. Think about how gross that makes you.

And hypocritical, double standard across the board. But anti-Zionist Jews protesting in Jerusalem to demand the release of Jews detained by Zionists in their prisons. Why? Because they speak out against what's going on in Gaza or speak out against the Zionist concept. So these are Orthodox Jews that are being dragged through the street and arrested. How does that line up with anybody to understand this? Just because they have a different political perspective. Hundreds of anti-Zionist Jews are detained under harsh conditions in Israeli prisons.

Israel arrests Jews and puts them in prison under harsh conditions just because they are against Zionism or the state of Israel. You may disagree with that. You may think they're gross for thinking that. But are you of the mind that if you don't agree with the government of Israel that you can be arrested? But let's still call it democracy, okay? Now, Sir Chili Bean points this out and I'll go to the document. The resolution adopted by the General Assembly of the United Nations, Zionism is a form of racism. So you can disagree with this all day long.

You must realize that this is a documented concept. And we can easily show the aggressive manipulation of the state of Israel in the processes of the UN. And even today, they're literally calling the UN Hamas, like not even hiding and pulling punches anymore. They're just clumsily saying you're just Hamas at this point. And the point is that they have been pressuring these entities to manipulate what these things are for a very long time. And now people of the world are very aware of the reality. The mask has been, the mask has slipped. But to understand this, 1975, you can see right here, the resolution is determining that Zionists, this past, determining that Zionism is a form of racism and radical discrimination.

General Assembly, and it points back to other things. So this is, this is the important point to remember. This has been established and reestablished multiple times until I think it was 19. when Israel was able to establish enough pull over this, utilizing the same things we've always seen, the United States government power and so on, to pressure and coerce people into basically removing this. Not voting that it's not so on, but just dis,

what's that word they use? I'll read it in a second. But it says, recalling its resolution of 1904, proclaiming the United Nations Declaration and Elimination of all forms of radical discrimination, and in particular, and in particular, its affirmation, that any doctrine of racial differentiation or superiority is scientifically false,

morally condemnable, socially unjust, and dangerous. Now, nobody can argue that what they're doing is something other than racial differentiation. Whatever the justification you claim, that doesn't make it any different. It is still the case, as we've shown you with things like this. This is the, as Netanyahu said, in retort to a person on the corporate media, trying to defend the fact that no, no, Arabs are equal in Israel. He stated publicly, Israel is the nation state of the Jews alone. They said, you're wrong.

Stuff like this, that Avi Shalom references. The point is, that is racial differentiation. Very clear. It says December 14, 1973, the General Assembly condemned the unholy alliance between South African racism and Zionism. Why? Because they're the same thing. because Israel was acutely involved with what they were doing in South Africa.

I'll show you more about this in their documentation. The point, though, is that they were working on building that same concept. They were working on ethnic weapons. They were doing, it's the worst kind of racism, Zionism, apartheid. It says, you know, those aren't necessarily exactly the same thing. But in this case, we're talking about the similar, Zionism has created apartheid and did so in South Africa as well. Now, think about that coming from Elon Musk's perspective. how ridiculous that is.

International cooperation and peace required the achievement of national liberation, this is 1975, and independence, the elimination of colonialism and neo-colonialism for an occupation, just specifically as a category, Zionism, apartheid, and racial discrimination in all its forms. So in this case, Zionism is analogous to just any form of racism. They're using this as a term to just say, these are the things that we have to do away with,

as well as the recognition of the dignity of peoples to the right of the self-determination, which they're fighting for. It says, taking note also of Resolution 77, adopted by the Assembly of Heads of State and Government of the Organization of African Unity at its 12th ordinary session, hold at Kampala from 28th to July to the 1st of August, 1975, which considered, quote, that the racist regime in occupied Palestine and the racist regimes in Zimbabwe and South Africa have a common imperialist origin. they all, they don't pass this resolution, forming a whole and having the same racist structure and being organically linked in their policy aimed at repression of the dignity and integrity of the human being. So obviously you can't argue this is just about Arabs if you're over here in South Africa in creating the same dynamic. So there's something inherently evil about this.

And this is what we're trying to show people. And so at this point in time, they, what's the, term overwhelmingly past this. And what they're discussing is not only that this is racist, not only that this is an apartheid state, Zionism is part of this problem, is the problem, but that they did the same thing in South Africa. Now, we can't pretend like these are not, and this, these things held for a very, very long time.

And by the way, are still largely accepted by the vast majority people, just not the manipulated UN body. But it says adopted at the conference of ministers of foreign affairs of non-aligned countries, held at Lima from the 25th of the 30th of August, 1975, which most severely condemned Zionism as a threat to world peace and security, and called upon all countries to oppose this racist and imperiless ideology. They determined that Zionism is a form of racism and radical discrimination. They voted this and passed it resoundingly.

I just don't know how we can't recognize what that shows you, that what changed is the influence of Zionism enough to get this to roll it back. But this was reality at the point, at the time, and still is. Now here was just a letter back that I find interesting from Yemen of all time, of all people, all countries, nations. The point is this was following this, this is 1987. And it says elimination of all forms of racial discrimination. That's a letter from Yemen. It's basically highlighting what we're discussing.

The implementation of the program. of action for the second decade to combat racial and racism and racial discrimination and grant you know a speedy granting of independence to colonial countries in regard to the you know like Palestinians fighting for their self-determination now it says I should like in my capacity as chairman of the group of Arab states for the month of February 1907 to draw attention to the letter from the letter we just read right the idea or rather know this one says the the permanent um make sure it's the right one resolution in Congress dated 15 August 1985, annexed there to contain the document.

Well, in case, they're referencing the same concepts. It might have just been in a later version of it, but you can see as I go forward, this is what they're discussing. The group of Arab states is amazed that resort should be had to an attack. And this is what we're talking about on resolution 3379. So what you're seeing here in 89 is Yemen standing up and saying, look, Israel is going after this, trying to call out. Like, we've all agreed.

This is a problem. and we've allowed this to get worse. And what we're highlighting here is that they're attacking this resolution. And they ultimately succeeded a couple years later. It says which was adopted more than 11 years ago by the Assembly in accordance with the procedures customer in the United Nations. And it says with the numbers of votes in favor more than double the number of Ginst. 72 to 35. The group of Arab states is amazed that also that such an attack should be made regarding a subject that was decided once and for all in a purely democratic manner more than a decade ago.

without the participation of Israel, which is basically the party concerned with Zionism as a lonesome, racist ideology, in a clear and ignominious attempt to exploit the difficult circumstances currently besetting the United Nations. So that's the point. At a time when there was turmoil in the body, they were exploiting this, and with the aim of pressuring the embarrass and embarrassing the organization. In the light of the above, it is quite clear that the aim is none other than to force this organization to disassociate itself from a portion of the achievements of which it can justifiably feel proud. We may very well be looking at the time when this body was officially broken, if you ever thought it was not. This makes it incumbent on its members to stand fast in the face of such attempts, which,

if crowned with success, would set a precedent that might have the direct consequences, which I think happened, and I think we are only just now seeing it corrected. The annex to the letter contained in document A. 2267 inspired by the defiance and disdain, which are inherent in all forms of racism and which are totally unjustified in the view of the lack of any forward-looking vision that might serve as a basis for the emergence of a new reality in the Middle East, restore right and justice and ensure the implementation of the inalienable rights of the Palestinian people, including its right to return, which is the last thing they'll ever allow, and its right to self-determination and to the establishment of an independent state, adopts the threatening tone of vilification as an instrument of pressure wielded by Zionism. circles inside and outside of Israel. That's important for the purpose of breaking out of the isolation resulting from its aggressive practices in the region and other regions. It's most amazing that this attempt should come at this time when the aggression of Zionism

against the Palestinian people and against Lebanon and other neighboring Arab states has reached its culmination. This has been going on so long. It's amazing that most people don't know that. This underscores beyond any doubt the fact that Israel persists in its same philosophy. feet. So the point is, despite the resolution 11 years ago, they've only gotten worse, which, by the way, was allowed because of groups like the United States government. And continues to use the same methods that led to that General Assembly 11 years ago. It says those who set themselves up as defenders of Zionism should refer to the debates that have taken place on the subject. Right? The point is, this stuff has already been laid out. Whether in the third committee or in the General Assembly at the Assembly's 13th session, In order to ascertain that the opponents of Zionism as an odious type of racism are as far removed as they could possibly be from anti-Semitism and opposition to Judaism. It's just so crazy how long this has been made, and they just keep forcing the narrative.

The Arabs as states and as a nation respect and revere Judaism as a revealed religion and do not see in its ancient heritage any connection as regards belief or as regards tearder. teachings and concepts with the Zionist movement. They're telling you exactly what we've been saying, which bases its philosophy on lonesome racial separatism as reflected in its shameful practices and anonymous measures. So what they're telling you at this time was that this was not, it's not about your racist allegations. It's about the fact that you're a racist entity.

And so what they've done over the years is both, you know, lie about that and force you to, as we're even seeing today, the conflation of Zionism and Judaism, but more so that they almost created the animosity towards Judaism, which, by the way, is exactly how this dynamic is meant to work. So you don't know to focus on Zionist actions. If you're blinded by their narrative, you get redirected to anger against Jews because that's what they want you to do so they can call you racist.

But the point ultimately is that it is using the people and the religion to hide what they're doing. And so over time, they've effectively manifested the very hatred, from people that are, I argue in some cases, just disgusting, but others that have been manipulated to hate Jews when really it's about the Zionist entity. And I think that's so incredibly important to see. And how does that make them any safer? It doesn't. The most dangerous place on the planet for Jews is in the Zionist state of Israel. It says the Arabs who are Semites by blood descendant cannot be anti-Semitic unless a man can be his own enemy. That's the point about pretending that the only thing that's

Semitic is somehow a Jew in Israel, despite the fact that they come from all over the world, and Israel is a state that was made on top of another. The Arabs are Semites here in this case. Palestineans are semites, rather. So it's stupid to make this game where it's all a manipulation. It says, we therefore hope

because of our concern for the credibility and prestige of the United Nations as a major international organization that the door will not be open to such dangerous attempts. They lost, of course. For otherwise, member states will find their selves abrogating on the morrow that they decide today that is very grave matter. What they're saying is they've established it. They voted.

It's behind you. So what they're allowing is Israel to come back and just go, well, we don't want that anymore. And just over the process of a decade, apply enough pressure to get them to finally roll it back, which they succeeded in doing. The resolution 377 adopted on November 10, 3075, quote, determined that Zionism is a form of racism and racial discrimination. 72 votes in favor, 35 again, 32 abstention. Of course, it was revoked, which is highly unusual by Resolution 4686, adopted on 16 December 1991. 111 votes in favor, 25 again, 13 abstention. There you are.

Now, here, to kind of wrap this little segment up in general, I think it's a really important point. We just showed you this yesterday, or two days ago, with Robert. At the time, that's why I took this picture, it literally, said the post may violate excess rules on hateful conduct. Do you know what he was, I'll play for you right now. Actually, let me just play it for you and we'll talk about it. This is Netanyahu talking about what he defines as terrorism. Explain for me how this is hateful conduct unless you, I'll just play it first. Do is target the innocent deliberately. And therefore, my definition of terrorism is the

systematic and deliberate attack, the murder, maiming, and menacing of innocence. civilians for political goals. You can tell a lot about terrorists, but what happens when they come to power? Those who fight for freedom and come to power do not impose terrorism. Those who do, who fight in terroristic means, end up as being masters of terrorist states. Right. I mean, it's literally what they've done. It all becomes semantics, but ultimately what you're discussing is the fact that they have continued to do the very things that put them in the position of creating a state of Israel.

terrorism. And let's not forget, the term, the definition, the actual definition of terrorism is using violence to commit political ends or to achieve political ends. It's simple, right? So it's incredible. So right as he's saying that, as Robert discussed, they were continuing to do so. So he wasn't even be honest then. But again, how is that hateful conduct? This is getting so abstracted. I mean, my personal opinion is because that's uncomfortable for the Israeli government. So dutifully, Twitter acts like it's violence. something and removes it while they're playing showing all sorts of hate speech against Palestinians all sorts of graphic images about Palestinians being killed no one cares about

those things apparently but guess what they've now removed it right it was posted and now it's gone I'm sure you could find other people posting it but how is that how is this being removed from Twitter he literally just is it's he said it is Netanyahu and he's simply saying something that should be taken as pretty obvious and benign that well terrorists do terroristic things and they continue to do so even after they have their state. Yeah, exactly. They delete this because it's uncomfortable and inconvenient, in my opinion. Either way, it does not apply to hate speech unless you're somehow using this to say, that's what they are, but that's not what the post was doing. So it's almost like they, this is what I was saying earlier today,

just I think it was Elon Levy, who I think it was Corby said something like people, they always have money, you know, people have, it was very abstract. It didn't specify anybody. It says money for but not enough for X, Y, and Z. Right? Elon responded. This is the representative for October 7th. He responded by saying, you know, but it's because of Hamas and Hamas does this and it's not our fault or whatever. He's super reactive.

And then comments underneath going, oh, well, maybe I'm misunderstood. I'm like, dude, you're so transparent. You're a guilty person. Your guilt is on the surface. People make statements directed at everybody and you act like you're being attacked when you're not. And the point is that that shows a guilty. conscience. You know that you're the one that is doing that. So when he makes the statement, you feel like it's directed at you. It's hilarious. But my point is, that's what I think is

partly happening here. Here's what Caitlin Johnstone wrote. I think this is important. Israel isn't relentlessly murderous and abusive because it's run by Jews. It's relentlessly murderous and abusive because that's the only way to maintain an ethno state that was abruptly dropped on top of an already existing civilization. This would be true if it was a Mormon state or a Romani state. Take any already existing country with its own ethnic and religious makeup and its own relationships with surrounding countries and drop a brand new artificial ethno state on top of it with a deluge of immigrants who are designated special above the people that were already in that region and you're going to get a ton of violence. It's kind of easy to understand. You're also going to see the dominant group espouse supremacist ideological beliefs,

especially when you cede them with that as a Zionist, you know, supremacist's, you know, supremacist's mindset, and they're going to have these beliefs to justify why it's okay for them be placed above the other group and receive better treatment by the state, take things that were once theirs. Of course, it's all justified because God said. These things would happen regardless of what those respective ethnic and religious makeups happen to be. I agree. How can we be sure of this?

She says, because we've seen it happen time and again in other settler colonialist projects throughout history, which had nothing to do with Jews or Muslims. It's not about Jews and Judaism. It's about the nature and character of the ethno state which got placed over the top of a pre-existing civilization in the 1940s. The religions and ethnicities are interchangeable with pretty much any other terms, pretty much any other in terms of how much violence would be necessary to institute and maintain such a state. How can you disagree with that? But some people will because they have a political agenda in my opinion. Now here's another group, different than Torah Judaism.

This one is just called Torah Jews, who have a very, very. This is a, I'll just read what it says, listen to an esteemed Holocaust survivor. And he's discussing one of these Holocaust survivors basically crying, falling to the ground and crying about how Zionists were hurting the Jewish people. Hi. As a scholar of the South Merabi, what was his reaction when he heard about the establishment of the state of Israel? He threw himself to the floor, cried and saying. Who knows who much trouble this establishment of the state of Israel

because for the Jewish people around the world? Interesting, right? The point simply being, and you can read, this is the other post from the same group, saying the Holocaust is not discussed too often an Orthodox Jewish circles versus Zionist ones. Why? And they're showing this clip of Ben Shapiro and Elon Musk taking their tour.

It says, we don't, this is them again, So basically saying it's Holocaust isn't discussed in Orthodox Jewish circles versus Zionist ones. It's why we don't need to promote Jewish suffering from Orthodox Jewish circles to gain any political points, right? Because Zionism is a political entity. That's the point. He says, we internalize the message and push ourselves to serve God accordingly. But Zionists need it for Zionism.

So they exploit the suffering of our people and work to conflate Judaism and Zionism through it. Now, look, you can disagree with that all you want, but these are Orthodox Jews expressing their opinion about it. You can't call them anti-Semitic or racist because you think they hate Jews when they're expressing their opinion as an Orthodox Jew in who, you know, the point is they could be wrong. You could disagree with them. But my point in making this is simple that you can't just call anybody who has a different opinion about these things racist. It certainly might be the case, but it becomes a scapegoat for anybody accusing the Israeli government of anything. And that's what they're all trying to highlight. Now, again, I'll include these.

I don't think it sways anybody who has such. suddenly decided that every human rights group in the world, which we never should have blindly trusted, or all Hamas or whatever, because they say the wrong thing. In 2021, they determined that it is an apartheid state. Human rights watch, a threshold crossed Israeli authorities and the crimes of apartheid. Amosian international. Israel's apartheid against Palestinians or Vets Salem and Israeli human rights group, the regime of Jewish supremacy from the Jordan River to the Mediterranean Sea. Pretty damn clear. And I'll just play Avi Shalom to end this segment. Zionism is racism. Israel cannot be both.

Israel is either a racist, Jewish state, or it's a democratic state for everybody. And that's what I would like Israel to be. I'd like a democratic solution, one state with equal rights for all its inhabitants. Your organization, Human Rights Watch, issued a report last year about Israel, and the conclusion was it is an apartheid state.

And there are four major human rights groups in the last two years who issued similar reports which the same conclusion, Israel is an apartheid state. So apartheid is racism. Apartheid is discrimination. But Israel is the only member of the United Nations, the type of. I know, which is officially racist. And I say this because of the July 2018 nation state law, which says the Jews have a unique, unique right to self-determination in Israel.

Unique means exclusive. It means Arabs have no right to self-determination. It means even if Arabs became a majority, they would still have no right. right to self-determination. So most certainly, Zionism is a racist ideology, and it is largely responsible for the Anakba that has unfolded throughout the last century and continues today. Well, you've seen that many times. I mean, I think it's important, how did I do that?

I think it's important to understand, hold on, that is strange. Oh, huh. Oh, I see why. Sorry, I'm weird about my screen being lined up. I guess it's just that tab. Yeah. But, you know, Obie Shalom is a highly respected British Israeli historian. You can disagree with him, right? But he knows what he's talking about.

And his statements are rooted in all the things we already showed you. And I'm actually interested in what's the fourth human rights group that he's stating there? I'm not familiar with that. Those are the main three I've shown you about apartheid. But it's very real. And it's not debatable as far as I'm concerned. You can support Zionism if you want, but that'd be like supporting the KKK as far as I'm concerned. That's probably going to piss a lot of people off.

It is a racist ideology and it is an apartheid state. Just politics are not enough to push back on that. It has been found very clearly. And again, it is people are waking up rapidly to that point. You support it? That's up to you. But you can't pretend it's not obviously what it is and what they were founded on, aligning themselves or trying to with the Nazi party itself twice, as even Dan Cohen is covered,

discussing how this was after the final solution. These are people that are trying to align themselves with a fascist entity, the Lehigh Party, or rather the Ergonne party and the option of Lehi party. This is the foundational aspects of Zionism. So here is what's currently happening and that is being justified or rather ignored by people in power because of what we're discussing, because of the influence of the racist Zionist entity. This is as of the jet january 19th so there's been six days since then 32,246 have been killed 12,660 of them have been children we're still at a point about like 70 something 80 something percent are children and women 115 journalists killed health care professionals guys look at this 300 and one of them

have been killed 300 doctors nurses ambulance drivers 208 health care facilities 24 hospitals I mean, it's just so staggering. And we'll get into the controlled demolition and how obvious it is that this is. And it's now been stated by Israeli media. This is a deliberate effort to clear out an area for these settlements. And then you get your government that just lies about this. And it's pretty clumsy. All the State Department representatives who are just spinning around the drain at this point,

like they have nothing they can say. We all see right through them. It shows you how feckless these people are. It does nothing to do with what's right, what's moral, what's legal, rules-based international order. Hardly. They are actively doing what's best for their interest at the expense of literally everything, including you.

So this is going to continue, apparently, according to your government, because they just don't care. Now, just today, and this was earlier today, the latest death toll for just today, 20 people have been killed, and this is just from the times of Gaza, so I guarantee it's more than this, in the Kuwaiti Square in northern Gaza, while seeking aid. And we'll get into that. people that were literally trying to take the aid that they've barely let through a fraction of a fraction of a fraction of what's needed. And we'll get into that too, deliberately holding it back. And then when they went to try and get it, they shot people.

I mean, there's just no way around this. This is because this has the dam is broken. It seems that now they don't even care what's being seen because I think that they know that the people who already see it, they already see it. The vast majority of governments and people and authority and they know that the ones that are doubled, tripled, quadrupled down are going to do something. so to the end. So might as well just go all out. That's what it feels like to me. 13 people killed in Almagazi refugee camp. At least 50 people killed in Con Unis. The very place where they keep screaming, everyone's supposed to go and be safe. And they keep bombing that area. We'll go over all of that.

Mohamed Safa points out that Israel has now dropped almost 30,000 bombs and shells on Gaza in 100 days plus. Eight times. Get this. Eight times more than the U.S. aimed at Iraq, six years of war. But it's totally justified and rational and balanced, they would tell you, right? Israel destroyed nearly twice the number of buildings in northern Gaza in just seven weeks,

then it destroyed in Aleppo in three years. These stuff, you just can't deny this stuff. This is overwhelming. They know they've lost the narrative. So, if you factor in their decision making process now, that if they know that we see through it, and they know that the moment

this stops, that somebody's going to go after them, they're going to try to shift this, pull you into the multi-front war, make this the most, you know, now they're once again floating the idea of nuclear weapons. They, and that guy got centered for it. Netanyahu, like, slapped him on the wrist. He came out yet again and said, let's nuke him. So clearly, this is being pushed to get, you know, if you push this thing over, if you knock it all down and it gets out of control, do you think people are going to be remembering or

talking about the fact that they should be held accountable for what they did over here when you're broken out some world war scenario? I hope to God that doesn't happen, but they are desperate. Understand that. And while they're doing this, and this is actually really important, understand we briefly talked about some of this with Robert. This is from the Wall Street Journal. Hamas told thus far falls short of Israel's war aims.

So we're talking about 32,000 people, 12,000 plus children alone, children being amputated with no anesthesia. Like it's just the most horrifying reality on the ground. and they have barely even achieved what they pretend they've achieved. Israel forces have killed 20 to 30% they say of Hamas fighters. Why? Well, because they're guessing

or because they're selling you a narrative they want you to think. And we can prove that because alternatively we'll show you after this. Guess what? That they secretly, without telling you, have already confirmed and have used for their own reports the death tolls being cited by the ministry of Gaza. That's the Israeli,

help the Israeli intelligence are now basically confirming that they are reliable and what they're using are now filtering through their own reports. And why it states why? And I'll go over it one second. Because they have no way to tell for themselves. This is being admitted. So explain for me how in the world, if you admit over here that you don't know how to discern because you're bombing and discriminately who you're getting and how many and what that you can then somehow go, I don't know, 30%. It's a completely BS made up number. Quite frankly, I don't even believe they're going after Hamas at this point. Now, I

say that kind of facetiously, but I really think that. It's just my opinion. Based on all of this, we'll get into Qatar later on the show as well, where I think that there's, it's obvious to me that the leadership is being protected, both by the U.S. and Israel at this point. And I'll go over why I think these new Arabs are coming out. But going forward here, Israel officials have conceded that despite an aggressive air and ground campaign, an aggressive, an aggressive bombing campaign inside of Gaza that has killed thousands of civilians that they even say that in this article, which is Even that is shocking. They haven't achieved their goal of destroying Amos.

Yeah, big surprise. You mean the group they funded and propped up all these years? Israel has withdrawn thousands of troops from Gaza following pressure from the U.S. Get this. This is how dumb this kind of reporting is. Wall Street Journal can't do their due diligence here or they just don't care. Israel's withdrawn thousands of troops from Gaza following pressure from the U.S. to transition to a more surgical phase of its war against Abbas.

But military officials say the war could continue for many months. isn't that that's that is backwards so they they spent months just bombing everywhere with minimal presence and have only recently started the ground invasion but so now they're pretending as if it's been this ground invasion the whole time and only now are they pulling back to bombing they're just trying to recreate the reality because they're desperate hoping in some way this kind of just redefines the history even though we all just saw what happened think how dumb that is that that's the wall street journal right that this nancy ussock you either don't know any better you're lying for them, which makes you a bad journalist.

But it says the U.S. has urged Israel to shift the war toward more targeted operations aimed at Hamas leadership. Again, you can't do more if you are doing everything you can. That's this stupid game they've been playing. Israel's doing everything they can to minimize civilian casualties, but we've been asking them to do more. That's stupid. So what they're telling you is we're urging them to stop bombing whoever everywhere and start actually going after Hamas like you're saying you are.

Hamas has suffered thousands of casualties. according to U.S. and Israel assessments. Well, it's interesting. How do they possibly know? Well, there's a point in here that explains why the U.S. government does have more insight to what's going on than they're admitting. And, of course, we could yet again show you that they've got generals and people on the ground in Israel, literally helping target, they know what's going on.

So when Matt Miller and whatever the Lollipop kid's name is, they start acting like, we just don't know and we have to wait to find out. We can't answer any questions. They know. They have, I don't know if they know, but the U.S. government is well aware of the true toll and what they're doing. They're a part of it. Now down here it says Hamas has denied that its forces have suffered heavy losses.

Now, they would say that even if they have. But consider the fact that they haven't, and that's a big lie. It says the U.S. estimate included in a classified report earlier this month was drawn, get this, from intercepted communications, analysis of the ruins in Gaza, wait a minute, drone surveillance of the territory, hold on, and intelligence provided by these railies. Okay, so those two in between points are quite important. You're telling me the U.S. government has drones analyzing the ruins of Gaza and surveilling the territory, and they're combining that with intercepted communications and when Israel claims it's happening, and you stand there and go, we don't even know what's going on. Israel, we told them, and we told not to, and we have to wait to find out.

They're playing dumb, and they're bad at it, even though they're dumb. The point is quite clear. They could get some insight. If they wanted to, they could ask the Israelis, they could intercept communications, they could use their drones and other surveillance. to find out what's going on in the ground, and yet just don't care. Or rather they are, and they lie about it. It says here that Hamas is attempting to reassert its authority by putting bombs everywhere, by using suicide vests, no, by putting small groups of police and emergency services to patrol the streets.

Terror, according to Israeli officials and Palestinian residents. So you're telling me that this terror danger group is putting out police and ambulances? What terrible, I mean, it's like, I'm not trying to pretend Hamas is not, at least in some way, what we all should be concerned. they are largely, in my opinion, because they were funded by Israel to be that terrorist entity. I'm going to say we need to wrap our minds around how important that part of it is. But you're making this out. So the argument is they're terrorizing everybody and they're in control and they're putting police out to reestablish control of the area and ambulances to help people that need.

And it's just funny how that is the entity that right now what we're watching is the overwhelming reality that Israel, the Zionists, government is acting in terrorism in every possible way. Now, Hamas very well could be doing the same, but I'm not seeing anything that verifies that outside of some things that happened on October 7. Now, it says earlier this week, Hamas fired a barrage of rockets into Israel from an area of central Gaza where Israeli forces had been operating a day earlier, highlighting concerns by some in Israel that Hamas will simply reassert itself in any area is not controlled by Israeli forces.

So simultaneously, trying to argue or justify the reality that Israel, real has to constantly forever occupy it, which, by the way, has always been their plan. So here, the corporate media is already starting to get on board. We need to rationalize and justify why they're going to reassert settlements inside the area, even though it's illegal. But on top of that, what does it show you? They're not going after these people, guys. If they're truly securing these areas and they claim they're, oh, we found the tunnels,

we're blowing it up and we're secure. Now the north's secure. We're going forward. And they just pop up the next day, and they're right in the same area. Of course, they could have moved into these areas, but you clearly don't have any security control over this tiny area. And it's not tiny in the sense of, you know, in the sense of the world. It is a small controllable area based on the kind of surveillance and personnel that they have. I don't believe they're going after Hamas. I really don't. I just frankly don't think that's

even, I think this is about destroying Palestine, which is not that hard to wrap your mind around. But what it shows you is that I think just always having this ambiguous presence everywhere, which is what they're kind of arguing will never, will always be the case until we do what we told do we want to do. It's just a justification to continue ethnically cleansing the area. Now, Yuval Abraham, who is a, oh yeah, he was a journalist for 972 magazine, who was involved with the mass assassination program article, which I'll include for you right here. We covered this as well, but just reading the article is probably the best way to go, which this is citing, I think it was six IDF members, both former and current, on the record, telling you that

we're murdering people for no reason, during. down buildings just to bring down buildings. They coined the term a mass assassination factory. So he's writing about this, and he says, intelligence, Israeli intelligence secretly surveilled officials in Gaza's health ministry to check if their data on the number of civilians killed in Gaza was reliable. You know, the very thing they outwardly tell you can't be. And guess what?

They found the numbers are reliable. And now regularly use them, regularly use them in their internal intelligence briefings. You know how we know this? because it was broken by an Israeli platform. This is a Hebrew version of Israeli media in Israel and is telling you, well, the Army checked and found that the reports of the dead in the Ministry of Health in Gaza are reliable. Some sources in the intelligence told the local

conversation that the Army followed senior officials in the Health Ministry in Gaza and came to the conclusion that the reports are reliable. It says the military intelligence system relies almost exclusively on the Ministry of Health, which is under control of Hamas in Gaza, to estimate how many civilians the army has killed in the strip since the beginning of the war, two Israeli intelligence sources revealed to local talk. This is in contrast to the statements of the officials in Israel,

and Joe Biden, where they pretend it's all questionable, as they're literally using them in their own intelligence briefings. One of the sources said that the comprehensive investigation was conducted during the war, which included classified operations, which revealed that the numbers published by them were on the whole reliable. I basically estimate the number of civilians killed, both the present and in previous operations. The two intelligence, The intelligence sources claim the Army does not have a reliable source. That's important of its own to rely on regarding the number of civilians killed, which, by the way, would mean anything happening in these areas, including how many Hamas members they've killed. It says, contrary to the procedure that was accepted in the past, in the current war, the Army does not conduct an examination of how many civilians were killed in each of the hundreds of attacks aimed at homes and of junior Hamas operatives.

Now, if they don't know how many civilians they've killed, it obviously makes sense, deductive logic. they don't know how many of the other side they've killed. Because if you knew how many civilians, you could deduce and say, well, the others were Hamas. Right? Either way. They don't know. So they acknowledge that Hamas and Gaza and the ministry are correct, which is hilarious, and then tell you, we just don't know. But yet they come out and say, we've killed 20 to 30 percent of the group that we don't even know how to define. I just think this is hilarious and they're caught in every possible way.

Now, he says, according to the two sources, Israeli intelligence has no good independent measure, as we just told you, to find out for themselves. One reason for this is that officers conducted hundreds of AI directed assassination strikes against suspected low-level Hamas operatives, which to them is anybody that ever brushed by one of the people they suspected themselves. I mean, it's really flimsy. We've gone over all this. Usually by destroying entire homes and killing entire families.

A practice we previously termed a mass assassination factory. There was often no bomb damage assessment for these strikes. means there was no check on who and how many siblings were killed. This routine post-strike check was skipped to save time. He says, quote, this is speaking from the IDF members. I don't know how many people I killed is collateral damage. We only check that information for senior Hamas targets. In other cases, I didn't care, he says.

I immediately moved on to the next target. The focus was on creating as many targets as quickly as possible. That's directly from this article. They're telling you, they're not checking this stuff. They're pretending that the AI knows. That's why he says, I trust Health Ministry of Gaza more than the IDF for these statistics. That's a direct quote from an internal source. I think on this one, yeah, that's good enough right there. Now, this, I just want you to see this. This is what a mass

assassination, indiscriminate bombing campaign truly looks like. It says, sadly, Gaza no longer exists. It's just crazy to see how much to damage. I mean, look out into the distance here. I mean, it's across the board. These are residential areas. They're buildings are destroyed. The infrastructure destroyed. This is by design. This is a deliberate deconstruction of their society so they can build what they want as the Israeli Zionist government. Very clear to me. Let me just look at all that guys. I mean, it's literally ever. Look at the distance. As far as you can see, these are just rubble. It's crazy to me. Now, by the way, just to give you a little bit of a positive note on this, despite all of that, the I see the International Court of Justice is supposed to rule, or rather,

the main ruling was going to take possibly a year or so, but the provisional measures in the meantime, apparently they're going to speak tomorrow at 1 p.m. I don't know if that's central or eastern or what, but tune in. This is their post. I'm sure we follow it to their account. I'm sure we'll find out.

There's a link here as well. I'm hoping that this goes in at least, like again, like I said, regardless of what they say, Israel's not going to care. But at the very least, we get the standing out there where they're saying, you need to do this so we can show you that they're not engaging with the process that they force others to do. Now this is what's so insulting about the whole thing, right? Whether it's the U.S. actions in Yemen or anywhere else that we can literally see that they are at war.

And this just becomes, I mean, we start with this, like the absurd game that's being played. Like we talk about when it comes to any number of the things that they state, right? Like safe and effective. They have meanings. And when you look at the definition of the word, what they're telling you is either of those, don't meet any of those definitions even based on what they've admitted to. So what is war? there's three things here, a state of open, armed, often prolonged conflict.

Carried out between nations. Okay. So that's obviously any of these things, Syria, Iraq, especially, or war. So they're at war with these countries, despite the game of words they play. Well, they're currently bombing Gaza. You can discuss, well, it does say states or parties. So there you go. They are right now in an open, armed, and prolonged conflict with Palestine.

So there's just no or Yemen for that matter. They've been bombing and starving Yemen for over a decade. So this game where they go, well, we're not at war with X, Y, it's all defensive. But again, we just got to put to bed the absurdity that there's any such thing as a defensive attack. That's just, that is just a manipulation of words. You're defending yourself if you're literally fighting as be as you're being attacked. It's as simple as that. The only reason you need a defensive attack term is for propaganda.

It's just a simple benign static thing. You're only defending yourself if you're responding to an attack. Now, you can still argue that you're justified in responding after that. I mean, I would even argue to a degree that if somebody, like the argument being made, somebody's bombing you and they stop and you know they're going to continue to. The point is, do you have a right to respond? I would argue to a degree within the realm of international law, not civilians and all the stuff we've always had to deal with.

Now, look, I flatly disagree with war in and of itself. My point is operating from within the dynamic they currently have. But to claim that you can defend yourself for the next three months or at all afterward is just a manipulation. It's the Bethlehem toad doctrine. It's about preemptive self-defense. It is Orwellian. So here is the Pentagon doing the same damn thing. Secretary General just now is talking about the conflict in the Middle East.

He's mentioning the Houthis. He's mentioning the U.S. and the U.K. strikes. He's mentioning what's going on with striking in Iraq. both Israelis and the United States, and he's urging all parties to step back from the brink and to consider the horrendous human cost of regional conflict. What's the Pentagon's response to that? So she's talking about the U.N. saying that,

which, of course, to the Israeli side of this now, the U.N. is just Hamas, and they're working with terrorists and so on, which, of course, you should consider, question everything. But the evidence they put forward is a bunch of screaming childish narrative that have nothing to back them up, other than some associations on the ground than a place that they would are to alternatively tell you is managed and run by Hamas. Like we're not going to have some overlap in these points.

The bottom line is to argue flatly that anything coming out of the UN is now compromised by Hamas is just a very flimsy tactic. So the point is that the UN is standing up and saying that everyone needs to stand back from this, which by the way I always dislike in every way the balanced nonsense. This should be about Israel stopping the murder of people in Palestine. At the very least, he says you guys should back away. Right? And so, of course, from the Israel side doesn't matter.

Here's what the Pentagon is to say. Well, Carla, we've been working for a very long time on regional security and stability, not only in the Middle East, but around the world. That's all war. All war. So we've been at war with this area for a very long time. That's what he doesn't want you to think that, but that's the truth. We'll continue to work very closely with allies and partners globally to address tensions

in the Middle East, you know, since Hamas is. attack against. None of which has anything to do with the question that she actually put forward. Your response to them. You're just giving platitudes. Israel, of course, we've been very focused on deterrence and on preventing a wider regional conflict, and we'll stay focused on that. Not an answer at all, actually. So we're going to do the same thing we're doing, shut up, right? We're going to deter with violence. Has that ever worked for you? No, it hasn't. Historically, every single time they say this is a deterrence, it causes more problems. Why? The same reason Israel screams. We have a right to defend ourselves. We have a right to

respond. Well, so do they. So you bomb a country that you're starving for 10 years and act shocked when they respond to you. By your own definition, that's preemptive self-defense. Is it not? It's just so insulting, the whole damn thing. What about his words on the brink? Is the U.S. on the brink of war right now in the Middle East? We are not at war in the Middle East. Clearly, there are significant tensions in the Middle East. And again, we're working closely with allies and partners to de-escalate and reduce those tensions where we can recognizing the fact that, you know, others have a vote as well. Right. So by war, we will de-escalate war. Does that make sense? Right? So if we're going to fight and I walk up and punch you in the face, I'm like, whoa, whoa, I'm just de-escalating. I'm just trying to calm it down by punching you in the face. Does that make sense? Obviously not. It doesn't make sense unless you try to contort this into some political gymnastics where you act like when they do it, it's okay. But when we do it, you know, it's a say, or rather when we do it, it's okay.

they do it is terrorism. It's just pathetic. We, as a society, just stop being counted along by the childish two-party illusion politics. That's the only reason this continues, because if we were all been independent of the party politics, we would be like, well, that's dumb. Obviously you're attacking. Now, there'd be jingoism, for sure, which still exist, people that are just blindly pro-America

to the point where whatever they do is right, whatever they do is bad. But it would be far less if we weren't caught up in the two-party paradigm of it all. How in the world are you going to pretend you're not at least? war while you're bombing multiple countries. It's just pathetic. And same thing this one said here, who's just a talking head. It's now fair to say that we're at war with Yemen and you guys, no, no, we don't think we're at war.

But you are, though, based on the definition of the word, but, you know, who cares about that? Now, let's talk about the other larger point about the complete dissolving destruction. It's like the right word I'm looking for. The narrative in Israel. Now, I've told you that this has been breaking down across the world. But there's been a very large support, you know, and there still is. I'm very frank.

I mean, it's very clear to me that the majority of Israelis want to continue what's going on in Gaza. But more and more, you're getting people that are beginning to realize how much they've been lied to. And especially more so than that, that whether or not they want to continue the war on Gaza, that they wanted all to stop until their families come home because they know the war on Gaza is going to kill their families, regardless of whether they state that it's meant to save them. You can't bomb them into freedom. It's ridiculous. But here is an Israeli journalist from Channel 13. news who is now is publicly discussing that they've been lied to and even show you clips of them

lying about the atrocity propaganda the same stuff by the way they keep citing in u.n discussions in all their day in the icj they mentioned the 40 beheaded dadies they just keep lying they can't stop lying about this stuff here's even the Israeli media breaking it down i don't think that's the right one hold on Now, you know, I forgot this was in. I forgot this was in. I was almost going to read it for you. That's too bad. I forgot. I just, I usually don't. I usually read them on. Looker, let's go back to this then. It's bigger. It's I like the way you can hear it though, because I guess for the podcast, it makes it more real. But this, the links are always included. So he says, good evening. And so we'll be talking about the new hostage deal outline. Will it be able to end the negotiations, the deadlock? Now, it's. says, but before that, let's watch the following footage of the Kaffir Brigade Commander from Channel 14. But you've seen this.

Oh, you know what? That's why I should do it this way, so you guys can hear it when I do play that. Hold on. We arrive in the Kibbutz Be Erie, and there I encountered. Two many images of the battle. One is a nursery school with innocent children. As you see the children inside the house, he says eight babies, eight babies died. Another image.

An elderly woman from Caboos B'ERI. And he says he saw the number engraved on her arm. And you say that's what they went through the Holocaust. No, what a convenient overlap. Ashowitz in the end, it died in Kaboz-Beerri. That's not something that we can't even understand. Now, actually, now I think about it, I'm not sure if he's implied. that that was a person that was in the Holocaust.

Why would you have an engraved number on your arm? I thought it was in any case, I took that as them saying that was Hamas that did that. But in any case, this is what he says. Well, eight babies were killed, were not, well, no eight babies were killed in Be'eri. You can prove this now because of the numbers after the fact. So that's a lie.

According to the Kaboot's spokesperson, and there's no woman named Jena in Be'eere. So he just wholesale made that up. Not new. There's a countless number of these. So who do you think put them to that? Do you think that random IDF members goes, I'm going to lie about this?

And that happened 45 times? No, this is, in my opinion, which I have to say because I can't prove it, but I think it's very obvious. This is the government. Manipulating people. Women. What's her name, Levy out there lying about images from 2022,

saying it's a woman raped. It's incredibly obvious. They've come out and said they were hung on close lines, what I think they show in this one, the beheaded babies. I mean, over and over and Horat's has continued to show you that they were lied about this stuff. And we can't stand back and see that. But again, that's why the average people, because of the independent media, they all

see this, which let's stand back and recognize that's why they're so desperately trying to shut down this kind of control. They've lost control of the flow of information. That's why they're desperately trying to censor. That's quite frankly why I think I'm being sued. Now twice, apparently, and I'll get into that as we go forward as I feel it's necessary to show you. I was talking with James Corby about it last night. I'm being attacked, guys, legitimately. But I think it's because everybody sees through it. And the people like us are having

an effect. We're reaching people. And they can stand up and be like, you're racist. You hate X, Y, and Z. And they go, well, that's dumb. Here's, he's showing documents. Here's what you said two years ago. It's just not working for him anymore. He says, watch some more footage. a soldier They were children here, babies who were hung on closed lines, he says. That journalist almost immediately found out he was lying and pulled back the whole story. Doesn't stop them from continuing to say it.

Amar very hard. I, when I saw it at this, it's also, it's just, it's either. you don't even what you're going to eye on if it's a a picture or that's a

really much to act of it he says but he's talking about supposedly event in Kaffir Azav they made it clear

a long time ago this did not happen that this event simply didn't happen think about that how powerful that is to have that on Israeli media.

And it says, by the way, he said these things. He was told that it didn't happen. And a tour of foreign news journalists who came there. Pay attention to what the police say, the foreign media not long ago. And pregnant women cut open. Guys, the things that are happening are so sick. Just look, these are, by the way, you already know all these are lies, right? Look at the way.

I mean, he screams disingenuous. He's acting. We know he is now. They're lying, right? But watch this through that lens, knowing that he's lying. It's so clear that this is about, and you get these kind of same feelings every time you see these things. When they reference the same overlaps, they, I just can't believe what I'm seeing. It's like the same kind of thing.

Now watch it with that lens. right he said the never it's not it's over sorry we're back before

for the news of people who came to look what ummere the the shawl the commasurer tocure it

a zara to see me put open guys the things that happen are so sick this is not a Netflix show

and it's not a cable news show none of that no this is real right it's real it's totally real it's not fake at all it's not fake

Not a lie. It's totally real. That usually is an indication that someone's lying. Real life. A lot of a gun, sorry. Women cut open. Guys, the things that happen are so sick. This is not a Netflix show and it's not a cable news show.

None of that. No, this is real life. What do you mean? It's not a cable news show. Aren't we supposed to believe that cable news is accurate? Like, I think he just stumbled, said the wrong thing. Point is, he lied. Also didn't happen.

So many terrible cruel things happen. Some of the most cruel things that can be done to a human October 7th. Why were these things that didn't happen said? It's called atrocity propaganda. Now, look, the whole point is here they bat this back and forth. And he goes, I assume in order to increase the magnitude of the hatred for Hamas, as if it's necessary to say, you know, what people, He says, but what are people inventing serious people are inventing these events?

He goes, the answer is that maybe they heard as a rumor. Like they just try their best to kind of walk this back. Well, they were upset and maybe they thought they were seeing it. Come on, guys, nobody believes that. You don't make up some specific detailed abstract or rather detailed concept that is, what's the word I was looking for? Well, anyway, the point is that has very specific concepts to it. The babies on the clothes lines,

the pregnant woman or stomach cut open. These are flat lies. 40 beheaded babies. You don't just accidentally make these arguments. You don't relay rumors. The point is they lied to you at a massive scale to justify, as Sam Hussein said many times, the killing of babies afterward,

which continues to happen right now in Gaza. Let me know if you can hear me. Looks like the streams dropping out. No surprise there. Yeah, this woman's the spread in the past, fictional story about a baby, put an oven. He says, but again, they admit right here that it wasn't this person. It was Zaka, right? Zaka's that group that has been clearly jockeying for position in the atrocity propaganda realm. And the same guy has still maintained the story despite Tourette's proving that it was false, despite people in the area proving that it didn't happen there. But yet they just keep saying it. That's how this works. Now here is a specific point about the rape allegations that I thought was really important to include. Cuds News Network and many of the

others pointed this out. The Israel Broadcasting Authority has reported that an Israeli reserve soldier has now been accused of raping a female soldier during a military operation, which if you understand their history, is pretty common. It says the reports come amidst a wide-range smear campaign by Israel trying to accuse Palestinian resistance fighters of rape without allowing an independent investigation or providing any evidence, or rather specifically any proof. But the evidence they're providing is secondhand, third hand, relayed through the IDF statements. It's really crazy how much they've pushed this with basically no evidence. Now, here is why I think this is so interesting.

This is not new. This is 2017. Times of Israel. One in six female IDF soldiers sexually harassed during Army service. Now, quite frankly, I'd be willing to argue you're going to find something similar in the U.S. military. But this is 2017. One and six.

Now, you'd think after this being called out by the corporates, media and people calling attention to it to the government. Hey, guys, there's a problem in our ranks and they even take action. They did. And they say, well, we're going to do this. We're going to do that. Then jump forward to 2022. It doubled. A third of Israeli female soldiers were sexually harassed in 2021. Or rather, whatever it was 17. Yeah. The point is it's obviously getting worse. And this is not a new concept. So I think it's very telling. And then by the way, we've gone over this the past, you'll find these things ad nauseum. Deceased Israeli soldier boasts about raping Palestinian women, Israeli army officer convicted of raping women. And many of these are where they get caught and then

get off. This person accused of raping an 11-year-old girl. It's very prevalent in the conversation. Now here is why I think is very interesting. Now, this again is an ongoing investigation about something that appears to happen quite frequently in this country. But this is new. This is from Well, rather not new, but December of the 2023. So it looks like about a month ago. IDF appears to push back on, quote, irresponsible claim that Hamas is refusing to release raped hostages. I think this is hilarious.

So you've got a point where the media, or rather the government and the Zionist leadership of Israel are screaming about no one was believing, you know, the truth of everyone was raped. And then there's basically zero evidence to back it up. And then as tip, we continue. to see as Biden walks out and says he saw the 40-bedded babies and then 30 seconds later they go, no, he didn't.

He's confused. That's not true. And the whole story falls apart. Well, Matt Miller came out, remember? They even name him in this discussion and says, well, they probably wouldn't release him because they were being raped. That's paraphrasing. But he absolutely made that insinuation. And I think it was Matt Lee and Saeed.

I forget which two, just went to town on him. Like, how are you going to make that claim? What's the evidence behind that? He goes, well, I don't have any evidence. So he clearly, for whatever reason, decided to float the idea and even the IDF was like irresponsible. I just think that's ridiculous. The IDF says public discussions about the state of captives held in Gaza has moved to reckless territory. The quote, the conversation around the issue is irresponsible, inaccurate, and should be avoided.

So they're chastising Matt Miller for suggesting they're being raped in Gaza while pushing a narrative that they're all raping everybody. How does that even possibly make sense? So the point is, bottom line, in every way, even from the. IDF, they're telling you, we don't have evidence of that. It's right there. Now, Mohammed Shihita points out, Shihada points out, another interesting dynamic to all of this. Haret says family of hostages are, quote, resorting to increasingly graphic descriptions, both real and unreal horror scripts, that's their quote, in order to pressure Israel's

government to return the hostages. So here's another dynamic to this. So not only are they forcing what are either somehow manipulating people to lie about all, all this stuff. The entire rape allegation push was backed by nothing. I'll even include the points here that shows you that their own people said, look, we don't have the evidence. The time has passed. There was a window to get forensic evidence. And for whatever reason, you didn't want that to happen. They have excuses, but they weren't justified. There was an entire period where they were well past the original stage of this where they definitely, when all they do is forensic, would have gone after specifically forensic evidence. Somebody told them not to or it wasn't available. That's the other part. Point is they point back and go too late. Evidence of Hamas, October 7th rape slips away. And what they mean is it wasn't present. We didn't have it.

We didn't look for it. And now we can't. So there is never, as far as Israeli courts go, you can never prove that somebody committed this step because they need that evidence in Israeli courts to make this allegation. So even within their own legal system, they know they can't, but they still force you to say it, otherwise you're racist. So what he says here, or this article here says, Oh, I already got it.

The rape descriptions are intended to persuade the government to return the kidnappings. It won't help. Wow. So even the point where we've gotten after the fact where they go, look, here's people saying that they, not that they experienced it, but that they think it's happening there. I think this is the one here where they spoke up. Yeah, this was not that long ago. I saw this. Actually, there's a girl in front of the Knesset's reading saying the girls are raped there and no one reports them.

These are moments there are some sitting in a cave and raping. Like, not that she saw that, but this is what they're arguing, right? The point is that that now turns out they've said this to try to force their hand to bring them home. And what they say in the article, it went the other direction. It says, you know, in order to persuade them, but the strategies backfiring because, quote, this is what they said. It activates their desire for revenge instead of negotiations. So all you did was give them the ammunition to be able to claim, see, we told you people were raped,

even though they don't have any evidence of that. And it even went the other direction. and now these people are speaking out and going, we just said this to get them to bring our families home. I mean, every angle of this, it's collapsing in real time and the people in Israel are the ones that are seemingly starting to call it out.

Read it for yourself. Oh, I did have them highlighted here, so it's the one I just showed you for the most part. Let me find this real quick. These casting... Huh? This seems... Oh, excuse me, this seems...

This seems to be utter helplessness. of those who seek to perpetuate the vulnerable existence of their sisters, daughters, supposed to care, but what they're saying is that people whose government is supposed to care for, but choose to ignore. I just wanted you to see that, that they're literally, this is his, heret speaking to the people, and what's telling you is the government is supposed to care about us, and they're ignoring us, us and our families. I don't care what you, how much Biden says or Matt Miller denies.

The people of Israel are acutely aware that they, at the very least, don't keep. care about their family members, even though that's a central argument for why all of this makes sense. It's crazy to me. Now, and this just says they take the, they're taking to more graphic descriptions, both real and non-real in order to get them to do what they want. It's very clear. Now, I'll include the ones we've discussed before. Robert did a great breakdown on this, did Hamas mass rape Israeli women. Here's what the evidence actually says. Not much has developed since then, really at all. Read it for yourself. It's a great breakdown. I've covered this twice, I think actually more than that, but specifically,

Harats exposes atrocity propaganda and were rapes committed on October 7th? Let's review the evidence. And this one, which we've shown you, they were caught using the old image, which I don't have on the top of my, let me see it pops up. It looks like it. Oh, well, I don't like this. This is just the mass rape breakdown. I can't do one more thing.

Hold on, actually. So I think this is an important one to include for people because, there we go. Oh, shoot. I think I just ended a stream somewhere. Apologies. I'm all over the place. I just wanted this one link that it was included

and a bunch of other stuff I had. So this, as you've seen before, is the image that's used, graphic, so heads up, that has been used by multiple, both by Levy and the whole rape investigation, as well as other websites claiming this proves, is an image that I have archived to,

at the very least, 2022. And they keep using this image. So I just think it's important to understand that they were caught using the old image on that website, then they quietly removed it. It's just so obvious. And again, after that, I think it was Max Blumenthal caught Levy using that in her presentation. It's incredible. All right. So moving on to the next segment. Let me see. I hope I didn't close something I needed here. Looks like, yeah, I think we're good. So let's go on to Cutter and the hostages. Since we're talking about, they ultimately, you know, those. lack of concern for their own people, or as well as the Palestinians, obviously, but this is the important segment to show you that they literally don't care about the people they're claiming are the central reason they're doing this. Now, this is Netanyahu's office is now under fire over leaked tape of criticism of Qatar. And this gets really important. It's interesting and I've been really calling out the fact that I think they're allowing that. And by the way, I think, they set on the record.

They set on the record that they were allowing, they were not going to go after Qatar, not going to get to Hamas. That was Netanyahu in the beginning of this. How does that possibly make sense if your goal is to eliminate Hamas, but you're going to allow them to stay over there? And the point is there are only these wealthy entities because the leadership have been siphoning off money

from what Entiahoo's been giving them, or ever taking directly what they're, and that money is coming from things that are supposed to go to help of Palestinians. So they're not inaccurate when they say that Hamas is taking this, but the point is that it's Hamas because of, Israel funding them to do that. And I've got this right here, just in case you wanted to see it again. This is Haretz two days after October 7th, quoting Netanyahu and what he said in 2019.

Anyone who wants to thwart the establishment of Palestinian state has to support bolstering Hamas and transferring money to Hamas. Quote, this is part of our strategy. It's just so disingenuous that people don't include this when you're criticizing what Hamas did. Well, you can say that, but then you have to include that Netanyahu funded them to do it. or that they did it after he funded them. So the point here is that we have to recognize that they've allowed these people

to become these wealthy manipulators because they've used them. So now it looks like Netanyahu deliberately leaks this in order to break down what was building towards another hostage exchange. It says families of Israeli hostages held in Gaza have accused Prime Minister of Netanyahu of personally leaking a tape in which he criticized Cutter's role in the swap negotiations.

Quote, all conversations that take place in meetings with Netanyahu are recorded by his office, and his associates presented the meetings. So what they're insinuating is he did this. The families participating in the meeting had their phones taken at the entrance. So nobody else could have had it. It says, cutter, from my point of view, is no different. This is what Netanyahu says. This is what the leaked documents or the recording says.

Cutter, from my point of view, is no different in essence than the United Nations or the Red Cross. It's even more problematic. It says, I have no illusions about them. They have leverage over Hamas because Qatar funds them. Oh, is that what's happening? Like, it's very clear that there's an ordination here and you're throwing them out of the bus as far as I concerned. Netanyahu said, look, and I'm not trying to say Qatar is clean of all this, but it's obvious who is making this the reality, in my opinion. Netanyahu has said he got, quote, very angry recently with the Americans for renewing a deal to extend U.S. military presence.

at a base in Qatar for the 10 years. Now think about that for a second. So this is a country that has publicly allowed Hamas to have offices in central locations in Qatar. That's a public conversation, right? And you're all telling us Hamas is like the biggest new thing. It's only a matter of time before it's on U.S. short, even Biden, even the U.S. government, but yet you're working out of the local,

you're working with that government. Like, so it just shows you they don't care about any of this stuff. they are the ones funding these entities. They're working with the worst of the worst because it's the way that they operate. They want you to think they're doing that. But think of the contradiction of allowing Qatar to be the mediator while they're hosting the leadership that you've been funding. And then the U.S. government has bases in the location. And I mean, it's just so plainly obvious that this is about something other than going after Hamas.

It says the leaked comments drew fire from Qatar, which accused Netanyahu of deliberately sabotaging. I put that word in there. the point, sabotaging the talks for hostage release for political reasons. It says there was no comment from Netanyahu's office, of course not, because you want to act like it's not going on. The Palestinian resistance groups demand an end to Israel's deadly offensive on Gaza for any deal on a prisoner swap with Israel. That's the point.

They're saying, look, we're not asking for three-day pauses for you to give some faux aid, let a few people out, to only arrest them again and start everything back over, because that is what's happened. They've scooped up far more than they ever released. least in the first pause. So it says the Israeli government has rejected calls for halting its brutal war on Gaza until destroying Hamas and releasing hostages. Right.

So it's just going to be very clear about this. Their goal is the destruction of Palestine, which they say is Hamas. And that second, that's primary. And the hostages are a distant, distant second. It's all very clear. Now, Dan Cohen writes that Netanyan, and I, this is, this was, this was my suspicion, when I read this. Obviously, they state that pretty clearly, but Dan confirms this with his own research, that Netanyahu planted recordings of himself attacking Qatar, which is mediating between Israel and Hamas.

He told families of captives that Qatar is more problematic than the United Nations in Red Cross. His political survival depends on permanent war. I was mentioning that earlier in the show, right? This is the latest tactic to prevent any progress in negotiations for a ceasefire and captive exchange. Right. This is desperate to control his own. to maintain his own power at the expense of quite literally everything. Israel, Israelis, Palestinians, foreign policy, everything. Now, here is the representative, the official spokesperson for the Ministry of Affairs from Qatar. We are appalled by the alleged remarks attributed to the Israeli prime minister in media reports about Qatar's role.

These remarks have validated are irresponsible and destructive to the efforts to save innocent lives, which is the point. They don't want to do that, Israel. For months and following a successful mediation last year that led to the release of more than 100, hostages, and again, remember Israel scooped up quite twice as many since then, probably more than that. Qatar has been engaged in regular dialogue with the negotiating parties, including Israeli institutions, attempting to establish the framework for a new hostage agreement, which they don't want, and the immediate entry of humanitarian aid into Gaza, which Israel is actively stopping. If the reported remarks are found to be true, the Israeli prime minister would only be

obstructing and undermining the mediation process. That's the point, for reasons that appear to serve his political career, instead of prioritizing saving innocent lives, including Israeli hostages. They are all very aware of this in Israel. Instead of concerning himself with Qatar's strategic relations with the United States, we hope Netanyahu decides to operate in good faith, hardly, and concentrate on releasing the hostages. It's the last thing that's going to happen, in my opinion. Here's the cradle reporting Egypt and Qatar are turning a cold shoulder to Netanyahu.

This was today. It says, doubling down on Netanyahu's comments on Thursday, Jewish supremacist, finance minister Smotrich accuses Cutter of quote financing terrorism. See how this works? Same thing the U.S. government does. Suddenly, this group that you were cozy with 30 seconds ago goes afoul of what you're doing. You're a racist. You hate Jews. You're terrorists. You're Hamas. Okay. I mean, I'm not even going to disagree for other reasons in regard to what they're involved in regarding terrorism, but where's the evidence? The point is it's not even about presenting anything. It's about you casting allegations because they go afoul of what you want.

Sort of like when I say, the Israeli government just murder people and they go, you're a racist. Okay, you can keep arguing these things, but it's not working anymore. And it says instead, the Gulf Kingdom is responsible for these Israeli armies' failure to rescue a single captive held by Himas and Gaza.

Oh, it's Qatar's fault? Like, think about arguing it is their fault, even though they're not present on the ground, for why they have failed to rescue somebody as opposed to the fact that Qatar mediation has brought people home. So their own ineptitude is being blamed on a group that's not even involved in what's going on on the ground.

That's pretty feeble. But it says, Cutter encourages terrorism, they claim, finances terrorism, pushes terror, and is playing a double game. Okay,

then why are you even working with them up until now? I mean, do they not think these things through? So if that's the case, then you've been working with an open terrorist group that you think is a terrorist group? Doesn't that show you something? Or you're lying about that. I mean,

it's the same thing you do with the Sudan. You say the Sudan or a bunch of terrorist groups. And then, but, but if you agree to normalize with Israel, we'll just pretend that's how the case. Or you were always lying that they were terrorists. Either way, their own policy and practice shows you that they're disingenuous. But it says, we could get all 136 hostages tomorrow if Qatar would give Hamas an ultimatum to return all the hostages. Oh, so now it's on them to deal with the group that you're, I mean, this is so abstract. You've been allowing them.

You could have gone after the leadership in Qatar immediately. And it says, and if the West would give Qatar an ultimatum to do that. Oh, so now it's the U.S. government's fault for not forcing Qatar to make an ultimatum with Hamas, which they, why would they be obligated to listen? This is just some desperate stuff. They're trying to, they are projecting it anybody, everybody. It's the U.N. It's the amnesty.

It's the U.S. It's everybody. You're all racist. Everybody hates me. You starting to see the point? Making matters worse for Israel, Egyptian president, Cici refused to have a phone call. Even Egypt. I mean, the government.

of Egypt, their release has been, they've normalized and so on. But they've now soured that relationship, and it's easy for Cici to fall back because his entire population is absolutely livid at Israel. Channel 13 reported that upon Netanyahu's request, the Israeli National Security Council attempted to coordinate a phone call with Cici, but the latter did not respond. That's quite the shift of power, isn't it? Cairo has been growing increasingly unhappy over Israel's demands to have greater surveillance of control over the Philadelphia axis, the crossing, which they've already told you they want

control over, which all continues to show you is that they want to be able to dictate even Egypt's side of this, because then they can force them into Egypt. It says, quote, the recent period has seen numerous statements from Israeli officials, particularly Netanyahu making claims and false accusations regarding the alleged smuggling operations of weapons, explosives, ammunition, and I knew it, and other components into the Gaza strip from the Egyptian territory. Remember when I told you the allegation of drugs smuggling. They said that's what they've drug smuggled.

And we had to shoot and open fire in the area that people had told you they were planning to do a false flag. And now you got Egypt going, they're making this stuff up. Because then they can say, well, Egypt's allowing terrorism. We have to take control of this. It's the same thing the U.S. government does. And who knows whether it's chicken or the egg, right? Very well could be that the U.S. is learning from now.

But it says he added that the lies being spread by Israel to justify as easy control of the border point constitutes a breach of the security agreement and protocols previously signed between him and Egypt. You think they care about that or anything else they sign? These are terrorists we're talking about. Army, Israeli Army, is refusing, this was last year, by the way, in October, to pay the salary of Netanyahu's hostage coordinator. I just thought, I hadn't seen this, and I thought this was very interesting.

The point is that I think at every possible level, the idea that they were ever, ever interested in trying to save the people that were taken is proven a thousand different ways to be false. The Hannibal directive is the obvious point, right? But it's in every way they seem to be trying to belittle and stifle any real effort to have these kind of exchanges. And this is why you get their feeble talking heads on Twitter that come out and say, Hamas rejected the offer of these fires.

He's just making stuff up. I mean, it's not even remotely accurate. And this person falls up and says, there are nothing but lies coming out of these Zionists. The deal was, we've already made this point. to release all hostages in exchange for a two-month ceasefire. They won't end the war. This is Israel.

There was no discussion about humanitarian aid. There is no end of the blockade. There is no end of the occupation. And quite frankly, if I remember correctly, it was not all hostages. It was, in fact, a minimal thing. The point is Israel is doing these incremental aspects of it that are only going to allow them to take everything back that they once gave up and to continue their plan. But it says Israel will continue all the atrocities against Palestinians after. two months. Who is going to agree with this? They won't want their people. The point is

it's obvious that they will continue. The point is about finding some resolution, some actual pause from this, which doesn't have to stop your actions against Hamas. The point is this, what you're doing is against all of Palestine. And everybody's starting to see that, even those that were pushing back. Now, this is what we just showed you the other day. These are the families. I'll just play it real quick so you can hear it. Basically, these are the families reading the Knesset one day after Netanyahu rejected a ceasefire.

So here's Eli David just ignorantly lying all over Twitter about this. Here are the families reaching in saying, look at how mad they are. It's because he's refused a deal for their families. They're literally screaming. You will not sit here while our children die. the Israeli government sacrificing its own people.

You know, you imagine how desperate and uncomfortable must be for these people to be just blatantly lying. Like all the clout he thought he built up during COVID, whatever else, I mean, they're going to lose this. They're going to drift away as some only Zionist topic. Like, everybody can see through them that had any honesty in them because they're just wholesale lying about stuff. Now here's an interesting point. Here's one of them, by the way. Hen Mazig is one of these people that are just screaming. It's basically you'll find the most identical post every day on all their platforms.

David and Hen and Eli Levy. Here's what he says. Palestinians in Gaza demand the release of the Israeli hostage today. Now look, first of all, certainly possible that exactly that is happening. Why that somehow makes a point, I'm sure there's people all over any country of any group grouping of people that disagree or agree with the policies or what's happening. Maybe these people are of the mind that them taking them in the first place is putting their lives at risk, which in a way it is.

It obviously is. But the point is that they mostly, largely agree with the fact that their entire lives have been suppressed. And so this is an action towards self-determination. But in any case, it wouldn't surprise me that there are Palestinians. They're just going, please, let them go so we can go back to the life we thought we had before. But I don't think that's what's happening. It says IDS spokesperson reports that Palestinians protest near a hospital in central Gaza

and expressing their anger at the situation they claim it's Hamas, and it's towards Hamas, and have caused in Gaza. This is all his framing, right? It's saying they demand the return of the kidnapped Israelis to their homes. Okay, well, guess what? There have been offering that. This is the part they just happened to leave out. You know, that they've offered a full exchange more than once from the very beginning.

The Israelis know that. That's why they're angry and pushing into the political scene. going, what are you doing? Do you take our families home? He rejected the deal. What was the deal for? A full exchange for all the people and a ceasefire. So my point is, these people are protesting that that's not being allowed to happen.

Or that they're just simply asking for Hamas to release them anyway. My point, though, is to simply frame all of this as a one-sided thing is just it's manipulative. It says so that the war will stop and they can return home. Okay, well, you could read that both way, couldn't you? What entity is stopping that from happening? Hamas is going here. We're offering. They don't want that.

They want a limited here. We want three days ceasefire for 100 people. No. Here's all of them for all of ours and a ceasefire. And they say no. So you can agree that that might not be in the best interest of the Israeli state. But the point is if your argument is it's all about the people and the hostages and taking our people back, they would take that. Why couldn't you just go back to war with Tass Moss afterward?

You break everything else. So these people want that to end. I think that they're making this into something it's not. Israelis want this to end. You're right. So take the ceasefire deal. Palestinians want this to end. You're right.

So take the ceasefire deal. They don't want that. They want war. They want absolute destruction. The only ones who want it to continue are Hamas. Well, then why are they offering a deal for full ceasefire? Like, it's pathetic how obvious these lies are. And let's realize, at least as they're claiming, but we can prove at least what,

15 of them. Hamas says 60 hostages have been killed in Israeli airstrikes on Gaza since the 7th. Well, their own people have made that claim. Their own Hannibal directive has been activated. They've shot three of them in real time. Three of them died from gas poisoning. It's obvious that it's easy

to see. And let's not forget that Israel also admitted that their numbers are correct. They're killing their own people. I think we need to be honest about that. Dan Cohen writes, the government of Israel, the cabinet of my country, or excuse me, he's this is uh i think it's noam dan saying this the government of israel the cabinet of my country my prime minister my defense minister they are enacting on my family on our citizens on civilians

taken captives from their homes the hannibal directive this is on israeli corporate media she's mainstream and dan writes mainstream media is covering up the undeniable fact that israel is sacrificing the captives of gaza in order to commit genocide and he writes and i Jake Tapper, Sean Hannity or Maddow or Tucker or any of them will even admit this. And he writes, they're all in his rules pocket. I agree with that. But think about that, guys. This is very, very clear.

She was there. She watched them kill people. She's speaking out and saying they're doing this. And yet we all just pretend, some lot pretend it's not even there. Well, here's an interesting point. Hollardine's reporting that Heretz is saying that General Needs on Alon reported that there is a possibility that the three prisoners who were killed as a result of inhaling toxic gas

after secondary chemical reactions trying to kind of water down the thing they said was false to begin with, remember? Here is on the 17th. IDF says it's unclear how these hostages have died. Well, the point is the mother has already gotten the report

who spoke out and said that you poisoned my son and lied about it. Dan Cohen covers the whole thing. And then on the 22nd, they follow up. Israel must investigate how these three Israelis died in Hamas tunnels. Like if people are wanting it And the point is it has come out

They're now admitting that there was it But it might have been the secondary aspect of it They're killing their people I think we really need to be honest about this Dan's doing great work covering this Now in this very point We talked about that earlier on the January 20th US this one Israel kills hostage

with poison gas that's based on Dan Cohen's work Yet again That far ahead of the mainstream narrative As it finally comes to terms with what we could prove all the way back then. Now, here's one interesting point about this, as they're seemingly just killing everybody, I guarantee you there's plenty of people in the IDF

that don't like this, don't agree with this, don't think that's what they are. Now, as we've shown you, I think it's easy to prove that a majority, I don't know if it's 70%, 90% or 51%, but a definite majority of people are on the side of what Israel's doing in Gaza. I think that's clear by many examples.

But again, as I always point out, I think that's Zionism manipulation. Sort of like I can prove to you that I think most Americans are blindly supportive of dangerous, aggressive wars based on nothing but seizing resources and occupation and control because they've been convinced that that's somehow American or patriotic. Same thing. They're wrong, obviously. Just like a lot of these Israelis, Israeli Jews, Israelis in general out there believe what they're doing because they've been brought up that way. But my point is, I do believe that not all of them. blindly think this is acceptable.

And the more they see it, the more that they watch the bad things happen or be forced to do it themselves, this happens. According to the Israeli Broadcasting Corporation, half of the Israeli settlers who evacuated the northern settlements on the border. Now, this is settlers. There's another point about IDF, but my point is just all of the population. These settlers on the border with Lebanon are, quote, suffering from post-traumatic stressed order and don't want to return to their homes.

It just shows you that I don't think everybody. fully agrees, but at the end of the day, it's, these are illegal settlers. I don't have any sympathy for you feeling stressed out about your illegal occupation being removed from Lebanese territory, which is what they're talking about. Well, this was the point. This is Tal Miznick, an 18-year-old who has been sentenced to 30 days in prison with 30 more coming if he doesn't seem like this indefinite sentence because he's refusing to list an IDF, which is an increasingly growing issue.

the Israeli government. People don't, as in this, I've said this before, broadly, pretty much everybody has to join the military. So that pretty much makes everybody a military target in the sense that they're all reservist, but ultimately that there are some loopholes as I used to understand it. Maybe that's changed today about going to college versus this. But he is saying no, a conscientious objector. And he's being sentenced to prison. What a democracy?

Now, here is Dan Cohen and Uncaptured News. This is the video I played for you before. and while I'll watch it. Israel is intentionally killing the capital of Gaza. There's so much evidence, it blows my mind. Now, two last points on this segment, Jeffrey LaFredo points out, and I already covered this. This is the teacher that they put in prison for saying,

killing innocent Gaza and people in Palestine were a problem. That's really what he's talking about, denouncing the slaughter of innocent people in Gaza. So they put him in prison for that. He's a teacher. He's now being attacked by people. I mean, it's just so overwhelmingly obvious This is nothing that we're told it is.

Democracy, if that's even what we want, hardly. This is an authoritarian apartheid state. And the one I played for you earlier. Zionist, rather Orthodox Jews being arrested by Zionists and put in prison because they disagree with Zionism. That's the reality. Now let's talk about the 24, 2024, there's different people staying different things, but it looks like the number is 24 IDF soldiers killed while they were illegally dumped, demolishing civilian infrastructure.

Robert and I talked about this on the 23rd. Very important conversation. There's so much that Robert sees that many people do not. I hope you'll check it out. Now here's what Elon Levy said on the 23rd. Israelis are waking up to an unbelievably painful morning with news that 21 reservists were killed yesterday in Gaza dismantling Hamas terror infrastructure.

Just so feeble and pathetic. The point is that you're, Are you trying to garner sympathy? Well, probably the time it took you to write this, there was 100 children killed in Gaza or, you know, people in general, or the fact that you're trying to act like these are people in war who are conducting a military war on an occupied territory and committing genocide at the order of Israeli government, and they get killed in the process, which, again, I said with Robert,

nobody should celebrate death, my opinion. But my God, the way that you're, this willful ignorance of what you're actually doing, the civilians in Gaza, you're a villain, man. You are a villain. It says, Israel is a small place. We're all about to find out multiple connections through. It's about personalizing this story, as opposed to the fact that these were 24 people that were trying to demolish civilian infrastructure illegally, which even your media is now

covered. But he says, the IDF has released 10 names. They were reservists, October 6th. They were living ordinary lives. Okay. I mean, I don't see why that has any difference. They were in the process of a crime. And he says here, it's a war we didn't want.

That's not true. It's a war we didn't start. That's not true. It's a war we didn't even expect. That's not true either. As we can clearly see, they were warned about it months in advance, right up to the day it happened. But this guy is nothing but a liar. But a war we must win and that we will never forgive Hamas for making us fight.

The only reason he's thinking, look, this guy's a near ratio on everything he does. Nobody's believing these people. But here's what this person posed. A war we did not want, a war we did not start. Well, here's October 6th. 2023 is the deadliest year for Palestinian children, say human rights groups. Weird how it was the day before you claimed this all started. They're liars, guys.

It's very transparent. Now, here's the intercept showing you that 21 Israeli troops were killed while planting explosives for a controlled demolition in Gaza, right? That this, and it's sound, read it for yourself. It's not debatable. And I'll show you why. But this is what the IDF said on the 23rd. 31 IDF soldiers were killed in action yesterday,

which again, I think is brought up 24, as they continue to operate against Hamas, centers of gravity in southern Gaza. Is anybody proven that? As the international community has made clear, you have to prove that. You can't just float the idea and demolish a block, but that's what they're doing.

So they're committing crimes based on that back and forth. It says based on information available at this stage, to be clear, even if they genuinely thought Hamas was there. The point is what has been stated from the international community is that they have to prove that. As Scott Ritter points out about what I think it was Al-Shifa, it turns out after the fact by their own actions, they revealed that they didn't know,

that they thought or they were lying about it. So that was a huge war crime on the record. So was all of this. This is based on the information available at this stage, the troops were operating in eastern Gaza near Con Unis. That's important because of how much destruction they're now waging and how many people are. There's war crimes being called out across the board now,

right now because of what happened to Con Unis. the forces were operating to remove structures and terrorist infrastructure that posed a threat to the security of Israeli communities. These are all just nice words. They completely devoid of fact. During the activity to remove the threat, it says an RPG missile was fired. So you're at war with this group. It's amazing how when you're at war with the group, their response to your destruction of civilian, or even if you were just fighting Amos, is somehow a terror act.

It's just, isn't that defense by your own definition? Simultaneously, there was an explosion which resulted in the collapse of a building, which killed these people. Now, I'm not, the music on this is not, I don't, this is, I'm not okay with people trying to act like this is funny. Whether or not you feel it's justified, we've got to have some reverence for human life, but just think that's important. But what they're showing you is the video they were making that they put out on their own channels, showing them making the explosives that they plant, which then proves that this is not some Hamas operation. as Matt Lee made a point of which I'll play you in a second. Look at them making all these bombs.

This is not some accidental thing. They are making bombs to plant in these locations to then demolition. That's what they're doing. And as Matt Lee pointed out, and Saeed them, same point. Do you know how long that takes? The fact that they go in there, carefully plant these things, which then by default proves that they're not a threat. The area is not a threat.

in one of these locations they did this, they buried people. They had to save some of them. So that means that they are either knowingly doing this in civilian locations or it's obvious that they have cleared the area and are doing it as we'll show you in a minute, as their own media proves to clear out areas for settlements. This is the assistant professor of law and finance and chairman of the EuroMed Human Rights Group saying Israeli soldiers, as you've seen, decide to detonate 21 homes belonging to innocent people in Bonnie Shihou. Shuhilu, Shihila, East Khan Yunus. Remember, the place where it's supposed to be safe where this isn't happening,

claiming that the explosion is in honor of 21 soldiers who were killed. This is so after this. So they're literally going, these people were just killed because they were illegally demolishing infrastructure and Gashat while they were doing it. Now they're doing it again in a massive area which you're about to see explode in the background in honor of them. See that?

Are we pretending that's about Hamas when you tell them it's in response to people. Like, that's retaliation during an illegal occupation, during an apartheid Zionist genocide. The brutality and mentality of Israel is unimaginably says. I agree. Here's the cradle. Showing you another one of these.

Inconunis, an entire residential block. Look at that. You know, long that takes to set up, they're acting, this was a complete, controlled demolition of an entire city block. and we're supposed to pretend like you would not. I mean, how do you do that without knowing the area is clear? Obviously.

Here's another one. Zionists blow up the houses of civilians in Kahn Units. These are all different locations. Just filming and just massive explosion. These are all planted. They are organized. It's in a clear, organized straight line. It's obvious what they're doing.

Here is Israeli TV where they are joking that he just can't sleep until he watches Palestine and home being destroyed. in Gaza. Oh, and they all laugh along with them. Says it right there. I can't get to sleep without watching homes in Gaza be destroyed. This is my point, guys. This is seated. These people are sociopathic.

Tali points out, you can read this for yourself. A soldier of Israel's engineering corps went to Facebook to share how he is brothers in arms in the IDF used 300 mines to blow up an entire neighborhood in Conunus, which we just saw as a revenge mission for being ambushed by one Palestinian fighter. That's what we just saw. They post about it. They say, we're doing this just for revenge. Seeing as how this public diary entry names battalions and even a commander,

I figure evidence is important to preserve. Of course, nobody's going to care because it's obvious what's happening. Your government and whatever body you think is going to respond as part of this. Here's another example of what they're doing. I'm smiling, posting all these minds they make. We must continue to subdue, crush, and mow down the Nazi enemy in Gaza with all our Right, that's what he says. Do you think that means only Hamas?

They're going after everybody. Here is one you've already seen, which I think is important to see again. Or they're watching this, the explosion of these buildings. And Matt Miller is just meekly, cowardly hiding from it like this job, of course, demands of him. The Israeli military occupied and destroyed the Israel University in Gaza. I mean, this is probably number 10 of all 10 universities that they have destroyed. And isn't the assessment of this department or this government that this was a legitimate target? So I can't speak to this individual action.

I don't have independent information to verify that. Oh, but you do, though. You've got drone surveillance and you've got higher up surveillance. You've got communication. You've got Israeli talk. And you've got people on the ground who are there helping with what's happening. Like, this is just a flat lie. especially since it was just admitted in their own media, that they were able to use that to be able to discern other things,

but somehow can't figure out this most obvious to control demolition. But don't work. They give them hell for saying something so stupid. I can say that we continue to urge Israel to avoid damage to critical infrastructure. That would, of course, include universities and to ensure the protection of humanitarian and medical sites. That has been something we have urged from the outset of this conflict. It is very difficult. And again, I'm not talking about this particular site because I don't have information about this particular site. But it is always difficult when you see Hamas use those civilian sites to hide its fighters,

to launch attacks on Israel. But there, you know, there seems to be no evidence that there were any fighters, in fact, any presence of any kind of military presence in the university itself. I mean, you keep saying that you want Israel not to destroy the infrastructure. Yet we have seen almost the total destruction of all infrastructure, including schools, hospitals, roads, you know, cemeteries, you know, they just, you know, they excavated a cemetery, for instance, and took bodies. I mean, this is not exactly, tell us in any way that the government of Israel is really paying heat to what you tell them, you know, in any way, by any measure. You're not listening

to you. So we have seen them take some steps to add civilian infrastructure to deconfliction sites. there are other things that we have urged them to do that we want them to do better on. So what exactly is a deconfliction site if they're bombing the safe areas? Obviously. I mean, I'm hoping somebody new here can really begin to see how easy this is to dismantle. Just feeble, weak lies that they, the only thing carrying them is their power and their forceful statement. It's just ridiculous.

It is an ongoing conversation between our two governments and something that the secretary spoke directly with the leadership of Israel in his trip last week. But again, there is also this problem that Hamas does continue to hide in and under civilian infrastructure. So when you see a strike against any one piece of civilian infrastructure to assess the validity of that strike, you have to know what it is that was there. So you're willing to assume that they were to allow that to float for now, but you're unwilling to assume that they weren't with that. Like the point is that there's nothing being presented to prove that at all in any sense. Even what he's saying with the fact that they've seen it happen before, show me. I would love to see a single example.

I'm not saying it's not happening. I'm just saying, as anybody ever seen the evidence of what they keep citing all these times they've been seen here? You can see videos. I'll show you one in the minute of the idea of showing you some abstract tunnel who knows where it is or what's going on or getting caught lying about those things. Have you ever seen a Hamas member or a rocket being shot from any? No, you haven't.

So this guy is just towing the line. And we don't always know that when I'm, at least I don't know that when I'm speaking from here. Based on Saeed's question about the demolition of the university, I don't know if you've seen the video. It's pretty widely available. I've seen the video. I mean, it looks like a controlled demolition.

It looks like, what we do here in this country when we're taking down an old hotel or a stadium. Here's the funny part to me. So they're saying it looks like that. Guys, they're openly telling you that. Well, you can argue they did it because Hamas. My point is they're posting these on TikTok and Instagram and going, we just destroy this block because of what they did yesterday.

And they're showing you the minds they're making. Right. I mean, it's all public evidence. And they just go out and they can just demolish this. controlled demolition. And then he comes up and says, looks like this. And now that we don't know what to figure out and make sure we do our due intelligence. They just posted on Instagram.

It's just so mind-blown. It's so frustrating that it can be this provable. And yet we watch the highest levels of power badmitting this back and forth like they're trying to figure it out. And you have nothing to say? You have nothing to say about this. I mean, to do that kind of an explosion, you need to be in there. You have to put the explosives down.

And it takes a lot of planning. and preparation to do. And if there was a threat from this particular facility, they wouldn't have been able to do it. So I have seen the video. I can tell you that it is something we are raising with the governor of Israel, as we do often do. When we see to ask questions and find out what the underlying situation is,

as we often do when we see reports of this nature. But I'm not able to characterize the actual facts on the ground before hearing that response. You saw the video. I didn't see the video. I don't know. I don't know what was. It looks like a bridge being imploded or something.

I don't know what was under that building. I don't know what was inside the building. It doesn't matter what was under the building because they obviously got in there to put the explosives down to do it in a way that they did. Again, I'm glad you have factual certainty about it. I just don't. All I have is what I saw in the video.

I just don't. I think you guys saw it too. We did see it. I can say that we have raised it with a It's not troubling to you? We are always troubled by any degradation of civilian infrastructure. Wow, you must be super troubled seeing us how they've degradated literally all the infrastructure. So you must be just pulling your hair out every day because it's constantly happening.

Clearly, they don't care, obviously. Gossip, but without knowing the actual underlying circumstances, I'm a little hesitant. I think for reasons that should be understandable to pass definitive judgment on it from this podium. Right, forever. Forever, on and on forever. We will just flatly always go, maybe, we don't know, it could be there. Sort of like saying it, no, no, like a virus could get worse. This new variant, it could be worse, could be more dangerous, and just letting that float

forever, right? The same damn thing. He's literally saying that we don't know, even though you have the evidence to know, and you can clearly prove that their own statements and posts online show you that, you know, and all they do is go, well, we just don't know what's in the building. Are you going to look into it? Are you going to find out? Are you ever going to ask?

It doesn't matter. Because they're willing to take the argument that that is the truth without any evidence, but are unwilling to take all the evidence we can show that proves that they are doing it. Because they're involved, obviously. Now, here's Daniel Lomodas pointing out over the past three months. The Israeli military has been demanding the people of Gaza evacuate to the Alwasi region, which is west of Conunis. The Israeli regime claimed the area was safe for Palestinian civilians, but at the same time targeted by intense Israeli airstrikes and artillery shelling during the past 12 hours resulting in dozens of casualties among innocent people. And I'll show you countless examples of

this. Here are the people in the hospital being brought in after the fact. I mean, do we really need, I mean, this should be a foregone conclusion at this point. Heretz, the New York Times, they've used the most destructive bombs in the very areas they tell them to go to to be safe. And they're using the dumb bombs that are not specific, are not targeted, or rather not precise, that have been given to them by the United States government. By the way, again, who have people in Israel helping designate who they target. They're involved. So when they're this complicit, they're in for the long haul.

So they will lie to the end about this, which very well may work. It has in the past. Let's make sure it doesn't. Knox Ballal points out these soldiers were killed in the houses. They lined with mines after fire from Hamas. It says they were killed. Why were they lying in the house with mines? She says, I've seen analysts speak of discipline and clearing mistakes today, but the IDF committed a war crime in the most pressing issue.

The IDF says the buildings are to be destroyed for creating a buffer zone. So the residents in houses in Maghazi area were reportedly marked for destruction. Despite the fact that people live there, the law on this is quite clear and unambiguous. The Rome statute, which comprises the crimes that the ICC tries, says extensive destruction of property, quote, not justified by military necessity is prohibited. Same statute again. Even if it exists extensive destruction, it is still prohibited unless it is imperatively demanded by the necessities of war.

None of this applies to what they're doing. And even though Israel is dismissive of the ICC, despite still being liable to prosecution by the ICC for crimes committed within Palestinian territory, because they are part of it, the fourth Geneva Convention, which Israel ratified, still prohibits the same conduct. My point is they don't care about any of these things. everything like this, the UN, the ICC, they will use them against whoever they can and they never fall. Same with the U.S. government. Nothing is sacred to them. And that's been made clear throughout history. I think the point is clear, guys. Obviously, they know what they're doing.

Now, on top of that, getting into some points about conunis in general before we get into, actually, I think this is a, hold on, make sure I didn't. Yeah, this is actually better to do first. This is more relevant to what we just came off of. And I'll show you some more stuff happening in Conunus. But this is another report from Hebrew media from Israel. It's been translated and it says for the past two months,

the IDF has been carrying out systematic destruction of all buildings within a kilometer of Gaza Strip without being criminalized as terrorist infrastructure. The death of the 21 soldiers yesterday is the second disaster resulting from the introduction of Israeli explosives in high quantities into the strip.

Systematic destruction for the purpose of creating a security strip along the border, a kilometer deep into the strip while risking the foot forces and without all the buildings being criminalized. Basically saying that they're risking the lives of soldiers for a non, that has nothing to do with fighting Hamas, while most of these buildings haven't even been deemed Hamas or criminalized in any way. In some places, it was reported that 100% of the buildings had been destroyed.

See, this is what people are trying to get the avid person to see. Those videos showing you, they've flattened the, this area. This is not about pinpoint targeting Hamas. They're destroying this for very clear reasons. Now, their own media, as I keep saying, has been breaking this down from the atrocity propaganda to the illegal demolitions. They're being exposed in real time. Now, here are some of the terrorizing things they're doing in the areas to, I don't know, drive out people or just hurt whoever they can. You might have seen this. Israeli troops are planting little detonators in Con Yunus schools

that explode and kill when you open them. Now, I want sure if they made these things to look like cans or these just happened to look like cans and they use them for that purpose. Some people have told me they did this like these are improvised devices,

which means that they would deliberately make them look like cans to specifically target starving children, but it says they conveniently look like food cans to starving children. There have already been examples of people opening these and dying. Think about how crazy that is.

That is, sedentious. which shouldn't surprise anybody at this point. Now here is a clip from Sky News, I believe, no, excuse me, BBC, as seemingly everybody, including CNN, BBC, have meekly cowardly come along to finally telling you what everybody else was already saying, because my point is that even these hacks and liars, they need to maintain their some influence. And so what it shows you is how clear everybody sees this.

Now, of course, consider that they want you to see this, always consider that. I just think the evidence is overwhelmingly obvious. This is because Israel is being belligerent and they've forced everybody to see what they've always been covering up for them, that they're a Zionist, racist, apartheid, illegal state and are willing to kill whoever, including their allies, to get what they want. Here's the BBC is now finally admitting in some way that they're detaining medics. You'll get there, or maybe not, because you're cowards, but at least they're showing you that they're breaking the law. The ministry in Gaza, run by Hamas, has said that 50 people were killed in overnight bombing

and 100 people injured around Han Yunus. There is intense bombardment now, aerial and naval around Han Yunus, which is where Israel believes the top Hamas commanders are holed up. Don't you love that? So just because they just say that now, it's funny how the top locations for them have constantly shifted to wherever the population is. I guess that could make sense to some people, or you could realize that they're just targeting Palestinians and the broad excuse that they never have to prove is that there's Hamas there. Maybe, but they should have to prove that as they've been killing 30 plus thousand people. It is focusing also around a couple of hospitals in the South,

one of which has been stormed with Israeli troops arresting the medics, or taking them in for questioning the medics inside that hospital, and another one has been surrounded, we understand, by Israeli tanks. Or I don't know, maybe taking them for questioning, you know, whatever, let's just assume into what makes it not so bad for them. a coward, right? No, they're detaining people because they're there. And many of them never leave those prison cells again. It's so disgusting how obvious this is. There's reports from people on the ground telling you that they were literally hanging people because they were hurt.

They were, I mean, it's so crazy. Now, yes, some of these could be made up. The point is that you don't need to make things up to see how grotesque this is. Their own actions are on full display right now. It's overwhelming. Here's the IDF. Now, let me ask you something. Everything we've showing you so far all the demolition all the killing 30,000 plus people and let's you just not take the full number just what I've shown you in con unis right bomb box you before we do that how about we realize and I'll come back to this the what we're seeing here con unis vocational training center one of the largest united nation schools in the area that has 30,000 people they're now bombing it 43,000 people that's being hit by their operations and now tell you this is

the second time in two days. They're bombing this. Why? Because Hamas, they say. That's what they're telling you. Before we get past that, here's what they're telling you, justifies that. All the demolitions of entire areas, even though their own media is reporting to you that it has nothing to do with Hamas, they want you to believe this is why. Does this prove anything to you? Now, who knows where this is? Old video or not. Looks like that same one we saw before. Who knows if this was built by Israel. Who knows? Maybe this is anywhere else.

It's saying, all they're telling you is this is a stronghold, specifically in Con Unis. Okay, well, why didn't, why would you make that the focal point? Why would you say, go here to be safe if you hadn't checked to make sure if it was clear? Are you telling me that you didn't even look to see if there were tunnels under the area that Hamas might have been in before you told them to go to the area to be safe? That seems pretty stupid. You're either the worst people, military presence in the world, which is certainly possible,

or you didn't, this is not real. And you're just telling us they're there, wherever you want to kill the population. My point in looking at this, guys, look at the video. It is a meaningless video. It has no evidence whatsoever. How do we even confirm this is where they say it is? Of course, it freezes.

Great job, Twitter. There it goes. It looks like you're inside of a house. How is that supposed to be indicative of some secret Hamas presence? The bottom line is none of this proves anything. And yet that's enough, apparently. Here's a tunnel video that we've already caught them lying in every single time before this that justifies murdering all these people.

And here's what defense minister says. Gallants, the operation in Conunus, the place where they're supposed to be safe, will expand to other areas. Of course it will. Because this is all of Palestine. He says we will expand our operation in this area, despite there being the safe zone. And smoke will continue to cover the Gaza Strip until we achieve our goals. They just don't care. They're right on the surface.

Is it the smoke will cover Hamas areas? No, we'll cover the Gaza Strip until we're done. All of it. Very, very clear. Now, if you needed any more evidence, here is a very specific example. There's just no denying this. And of course, what's his name, just clumsily tries to hide from this, just like Matt Miller. They're on the record, even while this corporate media outlet was there, they shot an innocent Palestinian waving a white flag walking in the right direction. As Glenn writes, there's simply no justifying this. except with the view that Palestinian lives, including children, have no value, which is so clearly the basis, the sometimes explicit basis of the destruction of Gaza.

Anybody honest can see this by now. In Gaza, it is over, and that still seems a long way off. Assessments will be made, and investigations will begin into how it was conducted by both sides, Hamas and Israel, whether the rules of war were followed. Tonight, news at 10 has evidence of a group of unarmed, Palestinians carrying a white flag, coming under fire in an area Israeli troops are now trying to capture, having previously declared it, a place of safety. One of the group was hit and fatally wounded as our cameraman filmed. The Israel Defence Force has dismissed our evidence.

The IDF is not aware of this incident, they told us. But our filming has, however, already raised questions about a possible war crime. What we are about to show is by its very nature. distressing. This is the edge of the supposedly safe area called Almwasi that the Israelis have been encouraging Gaz and civilians to flee to. Now, that's the important part. This is not, this is, this is this specific location, not all conunas, but the specific

Al-Mawesi location that they have been telling everyone to go to. You know, look, you can stand, they can stand back and say, well, we discover Hamas there. Well, then why are you still telling people to go? there to be safe because that's happening simultaneously. That's important to understand. So you're telling them to go to a place that you know you're going to bomb? It's just everything about what they're doing makes it clear that they're lying about what's really going on. These makeshift homes have been vacated because the war is getting closer. The billowing smoke was evidence of the new Israeli offensive in Cannesunis that has been forcing more families to

evacuate and seek safety elsewhere. No place safety in Gaza. Everywhere you are going, you will find the Israeli army. They are shoot us at home. Any building in the street, everywhere you are, they will give you a chance sometimes, just for five minutes, sometimes do not give you any chance to take your clothes, to take your children, to take your family,

and to get out of the building. How does anybody pretend that this is justified? No matter what you think actually happened in October 7, no matter how much presence you think Hamas has. Like, the point is, because of their outrage, just people's lives don't matter anymore. This is not supposed to be the way that we act like the Western societies operate, right? Or the rules-based international order.

It just shows you they're just as bad as anyone they claim they're fighting. That's the reality. This is our life in Gaza. It's very difficult. These pictures were filmed by a cameraman working for ITV news, in Gaza. As he moved forwards, towards the combat zone, he noticed this group of men doing their utmost to appear non-threatening.

Look at that way they're standing. There is no way. And they were there filming before this. They're no way they're a threat. Their hands are up. They're waving a white flag. And in fact, they're walking to the south, as the next clip will make clear when he talks to him at the State Department briefing.

They're walking in the right direction. they're doing everything they're supposed to do. Trying to proceed with care. They wanted to reach two other family members and get them out of harm's way. I have my mother, my brother in there, and around 50 or 70 displaced people in another house. So I'm trying to get their family members

and people that are afraid to move, rightly so, because of this reason. He goes and told us to evacuate, My brother out. I want to go and try to get that. The interview complete. Our cameraman walked away. And then personalize it for yourself while you watch this, right?

Imagine it's your mother, your brother, your sister, who is trapped in an area that they're bombing. And you're just going, or rather specifically, they're bombing everywhere. So you understand that. But they're nonetheless, this is still the direction. They're told they're supposed to go. And all you're doing is waiting a flag saying, I just want to get to my. family. And this happens.

This happened. The interviewee had been shot and fatally wounded. You can see them placed their flag on his chest. As he was carried away, the white flag was

turning red. Carry him. They've killed him, yells this youth. Then suddenly, Suddenly, more gunfire. They scream at a child telling him to find cover. By this stage, the man's wife, his widow, has heard what happened.

And as she rushes to the scene, she meets the party carrying away the body on a makeshift stretcher. When they're satisfied, they're a safe. distance away, they stop, and the morning starts. These tragic scenes have been repeated time and time again since this war began. At one point they tried CPR, but there was no bringing him back, his husband and father. Yet another innocent Palestinian civilian killed while posing no threat whatsoever. John Irvine, News at 10, Tel Aviv.

The Israel Defense Forces' assessment of our filming was that it had they claimed clearly been edited in the first instance. Of course, they have a duty to investigate the incident. John's been taking a look at it and seeking legal opinion on what it shows, John.

Julie, more than 25,000 deaths have been reported in Gaza since the 7th of October. Mainly civilians, many civilians, many women and many children. Israel's critics already say that amounts to a war crime. But now, just one more killing, this time beneath the white flag, the international symbol of surrender.

Is it enough to reach the same damning judgment? A civil rights lawyer who watched our video says it is compelling evidence. This group of five people are unarmed. They don't have any weapons of any kind. They're waving a white flag. do not present a threat. So to shoot them without warning, just like that, it's an execution. Now, this is not the first time nor the first war in which the Israeli army has been accused of firing on innocence, carrying a white flag after an Israeli incursion into Gaza at the end of 2008. Human rights groups

documented 11 such deaths. A subsequent UN inquiry blamed both sides for human rights abuses. Of course they did. In fact, much more influence. But the point is, was this October 7th, forward? Clearly not. So it's strange how this definitely didn't start after October 7th, as much as the Elon Leveys of the world would scream at you every day. Clearly, this has been ongoing. And you guys know this. You've been paying attention. Then two months ago, three Israeli hostages, Alon Shamrits, Yatom Haim, and Samir Talaka escape their captors and approached Israeli troops waving a white cloth or three. Hannibal directed. Shot dead. After that, the army's chief of staff made public a clear

message to his troops. Think before pulling the trigger. My God. It's such a lie because what we now later found out was that two of them were shot. The third was shot 15 minutes later after they coerced him out from behind the building. After he's been screaming, I'm an Israeli hostage. And the two people, two of them shot him as he walked out. That's an accident? I mean, God, come on. Like, there's so much evidence to this. It's infuriated. You're right? Right, there is simply no justifying this. Here is Rishi Sunak. Equally, in a feeble response, acting like this doesn't, we don't know for sure, even though

you don't need an international human rights lawyer that tell you what you saw there. It's obviously wrong, whatever you want to label it. But here's how the governments respond from the rules-based international order. Last night, as Tory MPs were once again fighting amongst themselves, the public were sat at home watching John Irvin of ITB News, a report on footage from Gaza of an unarmed Palestinian man walking under a white flag being shot and killed by the IDF. Prime Minister, such an act constitutes a war crime. Does it not? Mr Speaker, we've been absolutely consistent that international humanitarian law should be respected

and civilians will be. It should be. What does that mean? I'm so tired of the world. We've said repeatedly, that's not even the premise. You could just because you say, I keep saying things out loud that don't actually back up what I do, it's meaningless. But this is politics for you. This is why it's becoming hopefully more and more clear to the average person that anybody who believes in this process, the inner pure dynamics of the two-party paradigm are either that stupid or are part of the illusion.

I'm not trying to make it that binary. There's a middle ground, but my God, it's time to recognize how this hamster wheel that we're in if we play this game. Protected, I've made that point expressly to Prime Minister Netanyahu and the Foreign Secretary is in the region this week, making exactly

the same point. Mr. Speaker, I don't think it's unreasonable to expect the Prime Minister of the United Kingdom to rise to that dispatch box and tell the people of these aisles and elsewhere, that shooting an unarmed man walking under a white flag is a war crime.

Now, in recent weeks, this House has acted with urgency and intent following an ITV drama. The question is, will this House now show the same urgency and intent following this ITV news report? And finally, back a ceasefire in Gaza. Mr. Speaker, no one wants to see this conflict go on for a moment longer than necessary. And we do want to see an immediate and sustained humanitarian pause. A sustained humanitarian pause. Like they can't even say ceasefire and realize they don't because they keep refusing it. To get more aid in and crucially the hostages out, helping create the conditions for a sustainable ceasefire.

I set out the conditions for that earlier in the house. The foreign secretary is in the region today and will continue to press. all our allies and partners to make sure that we can bring about that outcome. It's just such meaningless nonsense. Now here, that's the UK responding to the same thing. Here is the State Department briefing. Descentred News put this out, where they're asking him about this, about the white flag and how they,

this is how your rules-based international order, US government, responded. I had the chance to see some of the footage shot by our cameraman in the Gaza Strip, widely shared online, showing a group of men, waving a white flag, representing no threat whatsoever, unarmed, and moving south to try and reach some relatives. The IDF opened fire, as you can see on that video, and killed one of them, Abu Salul. I wonder what your response to that is and whether you think from watching that video, whether that potentially represents a war crime. I have seen that footage, but I am not going to comments on the specifics around that, given I'm not aware of the full circumstances on the ground.

And as we've said before, this is not an American operation. And here's the point to make right there. And it's also important that he continues to try to repeat. It's not an American operation, despite you having leadership on the ground helping what they're doing. It's just, this is like saying you're not at war. It's just a flat lie. But the point is, it doesn't matter what else was going on. I don't care if that's the leadership of Hamas.

The point is, under international law, they were not presenting a threat. They were waving the white flag. So even then, you're supposed to take them into custody and deal with them as such. So you're a leader of Hamas, but you're going to be arrested and charged. That's not what they're doing, is it? They decided whether civilian or Hamas, that we're going to execute you because that's what we're doing. So this childish response to pretend like, we don't have all the context, it doesn't matter. It's like saying that we don't know it's genocide, as we can prove that they've stated they want genocide.

It's just a game of words. What you saw on that video was enough. Hands in the air, white flag, they shoot him, period. But this is what you get from the supposed leaders of the free world. The general matter, though, we have not parsed our words about the moral and strategic comparative that the government of Israel and the Israeli security forces have to take every effort possible to minimize civilian casualties and minimize impact on... Does that look like every...

Minimizing casualties, you shot them while they were standing with their arms up. You know, this is why this is such a difficult job for these people, especially if they're not sociopaths, because you stand there speaking, knowing that they know you're lying. It's just like this game that must be impossible if you have any feelings whatsoever. Civilians. As it relates to the footage that your organization has shared,

again, I'm just going to refrain from comments. on specific operations as we do not have full circumstances of what on the ground from here. This is... Except when Russia sneezes, and it's a war crime because we said so, right? Because you're ridiculous. In an American operation, I'm not on the ground there to speak to the full parameters of the situation. But again, any civilian death, any civilian death is heartbreaking and any civilian live loss. So the same point, right?

Jeez, you must, your heart broke 32,000 times. My God, you must be heartbroken or you don't care at all. is one too many. And we have made that clear with the Israelis and we'll continue to do so. Beyond that comment about it being heartbreaking, which is a platitude we often hear, are you, would you urge, given that you support, broadly support the IDF operations in the Gaza Strip, would you support an Israeli investigation of what happened in that video? That is for, given that they're waving a white flag and they represented no threat. That is for the IDF. He can't even say that. What would be the harm of saying, yeah, I would agree

investigation. Shouldn't you always agree to that? That's like saying flatly you condemn terrorism. Shouldn't you just be like we should always investigate? No, because they're so worried about the response of Israel. Even, even, you know, that's the point I was saying before about Levy freaking out about a broad statement aimed at everybody because they know they're criminals and they know that everyone's focusing. So everything's an attack. If he says we should ask for an investigation, they'll attack him for saying you're somehow backwardly admitting that we it's an investigation. Shouldn't you care to find out the truth? He can't. can't even say that.

This is desperation. To undertake and determine based on the circumstances of that situation. Did you actually reach out specifically to Israel about this footage and try to get whatever the facts that you guys are seeking? This footage just arrived earlier this morning, so I don't have any specifics of our diplomatic conversations around this to speak to. How about the footage that arose last week? He was funny, by the way.

He just said that he didn't have anything to speak to. but now he goes forward, watch his response is that I won't speak to any diplomatic. So why don't you just say that? First, it's, well, we don't have anything. But even if we did, I wouldn't speak to diplomatic back. It's always a game of words. You'll see what I mean.

And the week before, and the week before, and the week before. Our diplomatic conversations around this to speak to. How about the footage that arose last week, and the week before and the week before and the week before, where there have been. Yeah, similar, awfully close instances. Have you ever gotten an explanation from the Israelis? Have you ever gotten a finding from the Israelis?

I'm not going to speak to private diplomatic conversations, Matt, but this is something that we raise continuously with the Israelis. Have you ever gotten an answer from the Israelis? I'm just not going to speak to the privacy of certain diplomatic conversations, Matt. When you are asked specific questions like this relating to specific questions like this relating to specific footage. And this is not the first time that this has happened. You've been asked repeatedly about this.

And then you come back and say, well, we've raised questions. We've asked the Israelis questions. Have you ever gotten a response to any of those? Isn't it crazy what it looks like to have somebody finally asked questions? Like before, they used to just be like, thank you. And that's what you relay on Fox or CNN. Right. But five, like Matt Lee's always been pretty good at pushing back.

My point is that more and more people are starting to, you know, I don't recognize some of these new people, but they're asking questions, like legitimate questions that put them on the defensive. Thank God. Push for more of that because it's that easy to break down their arguments. These conversations are private. We have raised with the Israelis specific circumstances, and we have received correct. I'm not going to speak to those conversations right now.

In any case, are you aware of the Israelis say we smooth up here? I'm just not going to speak to the private. private conversations, Matt. Are you planning to ask about this particular instance or no? I'm just not going to speak to specific diplomatic conversations. Do you have any comment to the UNRWA saying that the UN shelter was shelled by tanks and communists today killing nine people? They say what is a UN shelter?

They're calling it a blatant violation of the rules of war. It's incredibly concerning, incredibly concerning Leon. when we deplore today's attack on the UN's Kahn Yunus training center. You've heard me say it before. You've heard the secretary say it before, but civilians must be protected. So have you asked the Israelis to look into this? We, I'm not, Matt, I'm not going to read out every single conversation that we have of the Israelis or read out every issue.

Not what he even asked. Like, what a bad response. The point is that question. Did you ask about that one? That response right there. You just said you asked, what was the response? like that isn't like and you realize that he's actually he's referring to things going all way back to the beginning so your argument is we'll just never ever tell you what we found out

our argument is that we look into it that's supposed to be enough for everybody it's just that's pretty sad I don't think you're asking the Israelis to look into this we I'm not Matt I'm not going to read out every single uh conversation that we have with the Israelis or read out every every issue that happens I don't think you're asked Or every single issue that happens in the region. Look, you've been twice here in the last three minutes. You've been asked about two specific incidents.

Have you raised? We continue to raise with our Israeli partners the need and the responsibility that they have to protect UN facilities and to protect humanitarian workers. We are asking about specific incidents, Matt. I'm not going to specifically read them out to you from up here. if they respond to you, you need to come back and tell us what they say. Matt, certain conversations, diplomatic conversations sensitive, tough diplomatic conversations

are best kept private. I assure you, though, we are raising these issues directly with our Israeli counterparts, and we'll continue to do so. The point is that Israel doesn't care. They don't care what the U.S. is saying. They don't care. They've only ever used people. This is the reality.

So they can't come out and say Israel told us to F off. So they have to, we raised it. Is that enough? Can we move forward? No, it's not enough. Assurance does it mean a whole hell of a lot if you're not able to say that. I assure you, though, we are raising these issues directly with Israeli counterparts, and we'll continue to do so. Assurance does it mean a whole hell of a lot if you're not able to say that you've gotten any response to them. I mean, you are the biggest supporter of the Israeli government.

And you can't, if you ask questions about troubling incidents, which you said just, said that this one in conunis was incredibly concerning and we deplore the attack. Matt, we'll intend to continue to have these conversations with the Israeli government and raise these very tough and difficult situations. That's all you got. We'll continue to raise the questions. Like it's just this hamster wheel of nonsense that, again, it's so transparent. It's painful.

That's what I said here. This is tough to watch. No one with a brain is confused about what was happening right there. It's self-evidence. The U.S. government is allowing and covering up genocide in real time using willful ignorance. Well, we don't have all the facts. Are you going to ask? I can't comment.

This is so stupid. And it's painful because people are dying while they allow this to continue. Now, Felipe Lazareni, the Commissioner General of the United Nations Palestinian Refugee Agency, has said another horrific day in Gaza. This was on 24th. The number of those killed is likely higher. Conunis, vocational training. That's what he just referenced. And even he says was terrible, deplorable.

I forget the word of use. One of the largest facilities, sheltering 30,000 people. The compound, as all of them have been, clearly marked as a UN facility. And its coordinates were shared with the Israeli authorities, which is likely why they got bombed. The point is that just because Elon Levy and David Eli

and these people online and Ben Shapiro come out and say, they're all Hamas, doesn't change. the legal dynamics of the fact that this is a protected UN location. And if you're going to pretend that they support Hamas, then you damn well but to prove that there's a Hamas presence in a school for 30,000 displaced people who are all civilians before you bomb them. And even then, it would still be a war crime because you bomb 30,000 innocent people. It's pretty simple.

Once again, a blatant disregard of the rules of war. And this is Thomas White, who is the director of the United Nations Palestinian Refugee Agency Affairs, saying attack on conunus, training. Center this afternoon on the 24th. Two tank rounds hit the building that shelters 800 people. This is one of the buildings. Reports now now nine of them have been killed, 75 injured. None of them Hamas.

All innocent Palestinian people trying to hide. The United Nations and the WHO team are trying to reach the center. Agreed upon route with Israeli army is now blockaded with an earthbank. Think about this. So they are agreed. They let them come through and then they block their way to see because. they don't want this being proven. It's also very clear what's going on.

Now here is the UNRah in general, 43,000 displaced people registered in this massively overcrowded shelter, now find themselves in the epicenter of war. They've hit this shelter with military operations. He falls up and says, or other UNRWA falls up and says, this is the second time in two days.

They fired on this location. You think that's an accident? Sanab agency reports. Dozens of martyrs in Israeli bombings of this school. which we just reported for you, but the point is that they've killed innocent people. 24, apparently. Alan McLeod points out, same point. You unofficials say, shells hit crowded shelter.

That's so stupid. There's a massive war crime, and they can't even say who obviously did it. Now, here's a CNN report. Even CNN, which nobody should be trusting. These are lying entities. But it shows you so much that they're now being forced to admit. It means it's like trying to pretend it's not raining when you're being rained on outside for some political reason. At some point, they have to be like, okay, screw it.

We have to say it because everybody can see it because we don't want to lose even what little credibility might still have. Again, that's what I think, but it certainly could be that we're supposed to see this, question both sides of that. I think all the evidence is plainly clear. But it says it's clear the Israeli army are not respecting their obligations under international humanitarian law. Now getting video out of Han Yunus in Gaza. shelter, housing displaced people came under fire today. The UN agency for Palestinian refugees says nine people were killed when tank rounds hit the building. 75 others were wounded. It says the compound's exact location had been shared with Israeli authorities calling the strike a blatant

disregard of the rules of war. Palestinian officials say hospitals in the city are also under attack. A witness says this video shows NASA hospital being targeted. The Palestinian Red Crescent says Israeli forces are now surrounding their headquarters at an Alama hospital as well. The IDF says it's pursuing Hamas military targets and the operation will continue, it says, for several days. And families in the meantime are streaming out of Han Yunus to try to escape the bombardment. You can hear gunfire crackling there as they flee. A UN special rapporteur told CNN today there are simply no words left to describe the

depth of the humanitarian catastrophe after three and a half months of war. Well, earlier, I spoke to UNRWA's director in Gaza, about the deadly attack there on its shelter. Thomas White gave us some context here. Have a listen. These were, you know, people who had fled from their homes in the north. You know, in some cases very early in the war. They were living in the Haina's training center, you know, which normally houses a couple of thousand students who are learning to be bricklayers and carpenters and learning business and IT skills. This training facility ended up hosting about 40,000 people in and around the training centre, all seeking shelter

under a UN flag. And increasingly in the last few days, the situation there has become more and more dangerous, very clear this afternoon. Any sense that there is protection under a UN flag It's very clear that the Israeli army are not respecting their obligations under international humanitarian law in terms of providing precaution for locations where there are civilians. Right. And you know, you could argue that Hamas there somehow makes it all target. But that the point would be if they should be removing people from the area, first of all. But secondarily or even first, prove that that's even the case. All of that matters. You can't just be like, oh, we're in war. So we have to deal with that later. And the U.S. goes, We'll figure it out after the fact. It's just so obvious. On top of that, as the cradle reports, Israel's brutal aggression on the Gaza Strip has destroyed 1,000.

Think about that, 1,000 out of 1,200 mosques. You think that's by accident? It's just this is the wholesale destruction of their society. It's severe destruction that caused the Israeli air strike in this, it's Kferkila village. And this is Lebanon. This is spinning out of control of a couple of, the points at the end. I'm determined to go through all this today, so we might even

at four hours. We'll see. Israel's military carried out a massacre last night. This is one of the locations we just talked about, bombarding an entire residential block, killing at least 10 people. Look at this stuff, guys. These are innocent people in innocent locations who are just being wholesale attacked because, because that's what they want. The aftermath, and this is important that he referenced, Saeed referenced the cemetery, and it's amazing how people dismiss this stuff. It's overwhelmingly obvious. The aftermath of the cemetery in northern Gaza being bulldozed by the army. For what?

And guess what? Stealing bodies. And of course they tried to cover this up by making other allegations. Here's Sarah claiming pointing out the Israeli government is stealing Palestinian corpses from cemeteries in Gaza, harvesting organs. The media refuses to cover it. There's a whole breakdown of a bunch of different clips here. My point is, I've covered this already. this is a I mean it's an open secret just like the human shield concept as I wrote Israel's open secret of Palestinian organ theft just look it up there's been at least five public wildly public cases over the years where doctors and and people in the idea they were caught actually you know I was the IDF or was the basically point is at level of authority they have allowed organ theft from corneas to other things multiple times have been caught for it Israelis overseas have been involved with

massive organ harvesting. You can't prove that's connected to the Israeli government or even Israel prop is in general, but it's interesting. But the point is, many cases you can. And so many times already, they've been caught like Al-Sheifa, where they stole these bodies. They brought them back for whatever reason. And Euromed Monitor came out and said there's multiple bodies missing organs. Nobody cared. But Sarah writes this. And of course, this person says, these are horrible accusations. Does they approve of this? Which is fair to ask. Please include the evidence. But what's crazy is it's out there. It's public. They're even now coming out and going, we did it for a reason.

This is from the 19th of January. IDF admits digging up gauze of graves. Do you know why they claim they did it? To make sure they weren't any bodies of hostages. Really? So you're going to dig up every graveyard everywhere and just to make sure there weren't any hostages that you're otherwise shooting down in the streets?

You can prove that they were, here's the point. These ones that they took, they're taking bodies. Why would they take bodies if they're looking for hostages? Easy question to ask. And then the ones that were brought back as I cover in this, show we're missing organs per human rights organizations. It's an open secret. Now, in general, guys, all of what we're showing you, it's so very clear that these people are on a destructive path and that they do not care about human life. And it seemingly, they want

this to break down. They don't want hostage deals. They want to achieve what they're going to achieve, which I'll show you next. But Muhammad Chihada points out the same person that did it last time, the heritage minister, calls for dropping a nuclear bomb on Gaza and then even goes on to brag that the international criminal court knows of his intentions. They don't care. Aside from being genocidal, Muhammad writes, this formal admission of Israel's nuclear arms,

and we talked about this last time, makes U.S. aid illegal. Under the 1976, U.S. Simington Amendment, however you pronounce that. We've covered this already. The point is that if the U.S. is not allowed to give aid to a country that has nuclear weapons

in the sense of, I think it's either that or the secret or not acknowledged. Either way, if Israel has nuclear weapons, it is illegal for them to be aiding them. That's why they've always allowed them to have what they call nuclear ambiguity. It's the only country in the world. And they've accidentally admitted it. Even Netanyahu very sheepishly said it one time and made this really dumb face. And everyone laughed.

They know, everybody knows they've got nuclear weapons. And now their second time threatening to nuke Gaza. Is that only going to, is it only nukes for Hamas? Is that how that works? Or clearly, it's about all of Palestine. Now, Solomon Ahmad points out that we've shown you many of these. And look, you can find examples of Palestinians doing similar things or schools where they teach similar things. And on either side of this, you could understand why there might be some developing animosity.

The point, though, is to show you, beyond a shadow of a doubt that the Israeli population, the infrastructure, the government, had taught the population, which is why you can see the majority want to see Gaza destroyed, to think that they are lesser than. I mean, that is what the Zionist state is in and of itself. That's why I played Avi Shalom's clip, that they're lesser than. They're not equal. Here is Israeli children chanting violence against Palestinians.

May your village burn down. As he writes, who is indoctrinating with the hate from a young age, Elon Musk. Now, look, there's a lot of arguments you can find about Palestinian schools and so on. But most of these examples, I can't really end up finding, like, there's one going around right now where one of these IDF members are sitting down with some puzzle he found. How do we know that's where you found it?

And how do we know? And quite frankly, when you look at the puzzle itself, it seems to suggest that everyone's out to attack and Palestinians are throwing rocks. And they point to the guns that are like on the Egypt side. On the other side, it's like, what are you trying to explain here that they're only throwing rocks? But of course, they make it into your teaching of hatred.

Well, you're teaching them the fact that they're occupied. And the fact that the Israeli Zionist entity has been completely stealing their existence from this. Like, how is that not going to drive animosity in this? In the same, you've got the Israeli government teaching these people that these are all a bunch of rabid Arab monsters that will rape your women. It's the same thing back and forth. But what we're seeing is one side with lots of power and the ability to commit genocide, actually doing it with the support of much of the population. Here's another example.

A video from an Israeli school saying, Al-Aqa mosque will collapse and explode, disappear. I feel like I want to kill them all an Arabic kid. There will be Arabs, but they will be slaves. There'll be massive war and all the Arabs will die. You can listen to all subtiles, can watch it for yourself. Just understand that it's not a one-sided thing. They're actively teaching this hatred. Now, in regard to the aid that's arriving,

which showing you the desperate hate for these people, not Hamas, but anybody that might still exist in Gaza. This is times of Gaza reporting that the occupation forces have opened fire on Gaza, on Gaza City, waiting for the arrival of humanitarian aid. This is not the first time. I want to say people of the people of the people that are happening. Now, ask yourself they're in the control of the aid flow, the same of the lozschean in a lot of people who are what's happening.

People have died while it's happening. Now ask yourself, since they're in control of the aid flow, why they would allow aid to go to a location where they might otherwise say Hamas was present. Think about that, because they're argument is inevitably going to be Hamas was there doing X, Y, and Z. Well, you put the aid there. The point is, they're ultimately creating a broad justification to just kill whoever's around anytime they utter the word Hamas. And the U.S. rules-based international order government doesn't care about any of that.

You get the point from that. You get the point from that. Here's another example. Kalisi shared this. Brothers Zaid and Naheed from Gaza were killed by Israeli murderous today, just like you saw before from where the guy was waving the white flag. Israeli occupation soldiers shot Zaid, who went out to get food from the aid trucks. And then, Nashid, his brother, who tried to save his brother's body by carrying him back,

was then also shot. This image should be burned into your memory. Two brothers shot on top of each other. One of them who you can literally see was holding a white flag. Think about that. They shot them because they were there, because they dared to go out into public when you provided aid a fraction of a fraction of a fraction of what might actually be needed

for desperately hungry people putting out cans that look like food that are bombs, and as they go to get it, you shoot him. As he goes to rescue his brother, you shoot him on top of him while he's holding a white flag. There's just no misunderstanding what's really going on here. On top of all of that, here are Israelis, proudly blocking humanity and aid into Gaza. So you could argue that Israel's not doing it,

but either way, here are Israelis who are proudly blocking the aid. And you can watch the video. They're just chanting and standing in front of these trucks, not letting them pass. Here is for the second day in a row. Israelis protesting at the border crossing, preventing aid from coming in.

And in case you think for one second that the Israeli government might not know about this, here is Mossad commenting publicly, thank you, who all came out yesterday to prevent the aid to reach Hamas. of course. Otherwise, reaching anybody else who might also be in the area who you claim you're trying to support. They're actively stopping this. Now, if you think it's only just these Israelis, you'd also be wrong because it is actively happening and always has been since the beginning.

Here is all the aid. Look at how many trucks are backed up. You realize that's all the aid. They bring in a truck. Here's a couple of bags and I'll shoot you while you get it. There are hundreds of trucks just waiting, much of which ends up probably going bad if there's some that might in there. But it says all, I imagine these days they'd probably try out to send things that could go bad. This is all aid being prevented from entering Gaza where you have two million starving people. That's what's happening. On top of that, this is important. It's important context to understand that Egypt and Israel are not on good terms right now,

not even the government, the people have always hated Israel in Egypt, the CC government, who is a puppet. They're not happy right now because these been blaming Egypt for everything. So he spoke up. He says, the president of Egypt, says, I'm very hurt by the words that Egypt is the very reason aid is not reaching Gaza, which has been their excuse. First, it's so Hamas won't let it through, and then it becomes self-evident that they're not even in control of either side of this.

So they go, well, Egypt is involved with not, they're holding it up. Funny how the narrative just shifts when they didn't stick. Let's try something else. The Rafa crossing was open 2470, he says. But Israel is blocking the aid. It was in my hands, if it was in my hands, prevented aid from reaching Gaza, where would I go before God? You could argue he's lying, but guess what?

Here's an overwhelming body of evidence showing you that they do have control of it and that they're actively trying to stop it in every possible way, even going as far as going, hooray, good for you for doing what we're also doing, blocking the aid. Now, while that's happening, while Israel's knowingly blocking it, pretending if anybody else's fault, here's a nice little video about an American in Israel, parading around all the food they have while they're fighting people. who are starving. Here in Gaza, we aren't eating our meals at the local restaurants.

We're carrying our food in these boxes, which are good for four soldiers for 24 hours. So to start off with our... They can clearly get food in there for all sorts of people, but not the starving people they claim they're trying to fight for, right? Main source of protein for breakfast, lunch, and dinner. We have our tuna. And for the side dishes, we have corn, we have chickpeas, and we have olives. Now, we're putting all these ingredients in this super healthy.

white bread and to make our sandwich is not as dry we will have ketchup. Why do you even post this? To be quite honest, what's the point other than to kind of parade this around people who are starving that you're fighting them while eating all this food? Dessert will have halva and of course pineapple which acts as a double dessert because it's the pineapple pieces and the pineapple juice. We get super creative tuna with corn, tuna with corn and chickpeas and on some days tuna with corn and chickpeas and pineapple and halva. But, don't ask me why.

But because we know we're going to be here for a while, we like to upgrade our sandwiches. So instead of bread, we'll bring tortillas. Instead of tuna, we'll bring these meat sticks, which I would never eat outside of the army because of the color. But hey, right now they're saving us. For dessert, we'll have Bamba. And from home, I brought Quest bars,

so I settled to Quest for satisfying my hunger at 3 a.m. liquid IV. On special occasions, I'll pull out the Flamin Hot Cheetos. And last but not least are the sauces, peanut, which is of course really good. But the holiest of all holies, and I don't care how heavy my bag is, I will always carry the one and only

syracia. That must be nice, right? Have all these extra benefits and extra different choices of what you can eat in desserts and all the sauces you could eat. It must be really nice while you're actively starving innocent people. Disgusting. Here's the Wall Street Journal. This is from 22nd of this month.

Tiny Gaza is home to most of the world, most of the world's hungriest people. So you put out a video about what you're eating? Why? I think it's quite obvious. Now here is Rami Arari journalist saying that the UN humanitarian corridor

for Palestine says Israel recently added insulin pens for children to a list of prohibited items. Of course they did, because it's all about saving them, right? that you're not allowed to enter Gaza. And he does, and that's one of the reasons they keep pointing out, there's all these random, like prohibited items, so they get the hold of everything to search through the trucks

to make sure none of it's on there and then half of it can't come in, and it just never ends up making it. And he does not know why they prohibited insulin pens. Well, I do, because they hate these people. He adds that the medicine for chronic illnesses are also not allowed. How do you possibly explain that? Well, it's obvious. That is not to mention that critical banned supplies, he mentioned,

which are urgently needed for water and sanitation, such as pumps, generators, spare parts, pipes, solar panels, medical equipment, aren't being allowed. Some of it is medical material, such as basic drugs and material for treating not just trauma, but chronic illnesses. One example would be most recently the pens that are used for insulin for children have been recently put on that list. In terms of the reasons for rationale for it, I really can't explain what this is because I don't know. We are currently in discussions with Israeli authorities to look at ways how we can examine that list. and which they think is prohibited items and find ways we can get these released because they are going to be essential commodities. That's exactly why they're being blocked.

Okay, so realize this is ridiculous to me. This is a UN humanitarian coordinator, I think I said a coordinator, a coordinator, right, working with Kogat, an Israeli entity in back and forth conversations about what they can allow. We already know they put all sorts of things on the list that Egypt has pointed out, Other governments have pointed out. And what do they do? The same thing they do about everything else. Elon Levy comes out and lies about it. This is just made up.

Israel has placed no limits on the entrant of medicines and medical supplies. Are you effing kidding me? I mean, I think everybody knows that's happening, including the fact that they were even forced to bring in those fake boxes with big 90s printed out medical supplies on the side, which turned out to be things they planted in the Sheepa Hospital. But why would you have been forced to bring in all these random boxes if you're letting it come in through.

It's just so absurd. I mean, what else are you going to do, I guess? Everyone knows you're lying. You know you're lying. We all see right through, we've got to go after it. Liar, you're racist, you hate Jews. Does that work for anybody?

Insulin pens are not on the dual list. So it's funny how that's all, but everything else is, though. The point is the guy is in the middle of these negotiations and you're pretending he's not, it's obvious this happening. Watch. watch as it goes forward.

And all they do is probably, oh, he works for Hamas now. Gabriel Elze Ando, ondo, Eliseondo, interesting name, writes, Robert Wood, Deputy U.S. ambassador, and he's a correspondent for Al Jazeera, English, Gabriel. Deputy U.S. ambassador to the U.N. stopped by the stakeout on his way to a United Nations Security Council,

Haiti briefing. He was asked, among other things, if the U.S. still thinks the International Court of Justice genocide case is meritless. He says we do. Of course they do. That's the quadrupling down. What are they going to do? It doesn't represent, you know, one thing I could do is, you know, not be a genocide supporting government. But, you know, it says it doesn't represent what happened on the ground. What, the everything they cited, which you can literally prove.

So they're desperate. That's how our, that's our view, but the court will make a decision on that. He says, so what happened on the ground then? What was the reality? He says, it's a terrible, terrible situation. We've said this many times before. Plattitude after platitude. We're very concerned about the humanitarian situation that we continue to ignore.

And obviously, the loss of life has been horrible that we act like isn't a problem. And that we are trying to do, and what we're trying to do when our policies is to be geared toward doing is to try to first and foremost get humanitarian assistance in the situation as they're actively keeping that from happening. And to get the hostages out as they bomb where they might be. It's all so flimsy. So we're going to continue to work on this. and again, we're thinking about the day after, blah, blah, blah. And then he responds. But Russian foreign minister, Labrov, said yesterday it's too early to think about the day

after because Palestinians are dying today. Of course, to them, Palestinians don't matter, so they skip past it. He said you can talk about the day after if there's still bombs being dropped on them or you can't. Do you have a response to that? I mean, it's kind of obvious. Look, you're claiming you're fighting for Palestinians against Tamas, right? They're dying now. So why is it that you push off their plight to after you,

up continuing the thing that keeps taking their lives because they don't care about them. But here's our response. You certainly have to think about the day after. And I think you've heard the interviews in the room. Folks are very concerned about moving toward the need to move towards a two-state solution. You know what statement? They're very concerned about moving toward the need to move towards a new state solution. The very two-state solution that Netanyahu and his team are proudly saying they'll never allow.

So this is what they're saying that we need to focus on the day after. for a thing that they'll tell you will never happen. It's all completely, it's smoke and mirrors, guys. So people are thinking about that, he says, you know, I really don't pay much attention to what the Russians say, to be honest. Yeah, big surprise. Here is Kenneth Roth, former executive director of Human Rights Watch,

saying as if the article says Netanyahu pushes most pro-Israel, U.S. Democrats, to take previously unimaginable measures and steps, like basically showing that this is what I, This is actually what I really think is part of this, or almost all of it, that Israel's Zionist belligerents, just straight to full genocide immediately after something that they could have marshaled into support more than they've ever seen before, which would have been in a shot. The support they've had this whole time is unparalleled.

Had they stopped after October 7th, went to the U.N. and made the argument that this was unprecedented. I mean, they would have had support to the teeth. Instead, they went full genocide, and now everybody can see, what they are. But what's crazy about it is these people who are pro-Israel are being pushed into supporting things that are so transparent. And I think that's what I mean is that everything they've done has exposed the bigger picture. And yes, part of this could be organized and planned and allowed to happen. These are questions we should ask. But the true point that I keep coming back to is that

the Zionist entity has cashed in too many chips. And people now see what was always going on. It says as if Netanyahu's attitude hasn't been clear for years, which I agree with. All signs indicate that Netanyahu's repeated dismissal of the potential two-state solution could serve as one of the final blows to continue democratic support for the Israel's war in Gaza. Because they keep pretending that's coming. Now, here is a couple points to show you that, I mean, from average society all the way to top of the government, they're now being public about it. Not only are we never going to allow that, we're going to settle in Gaza, which is what we keep telling you was going to happen. That was always the plan. And your government is still pretending like that's not the case.

Here's Torah Judaism saying theft and occupation are ingrained in the genes of the Zionists. Israeli Zionist families have prepared their cars and banners and they're waiting to move to Gaza. The text on the banners quite literally read, conquer, settle, win. That's what this says. Oh, you know what? I thought this was in, here, actually downless for quick. I thought this was in Hebrew. You can listen to what they're saying here.

So basically, you have settled, you know, Israelis, average Israeli people who are proudly putting up statements that are telling you the very thing that the U.S. government pretends is completely fake. And if you say it, you're a racist. That's how obvious all of this has gotten. So here is the little clip we were just looking at. Really families are gathering here because they want to go and live in Gaza,

which they sometimes call Gush Katif, even as war can. continues to bring death and destruction to Palestinians in the strip. Their signs read, only settlements will bring security and conquering, settling, winning. You look in the Torah and you see, very simple. The answer there, you know, that Israel belongs to the Jews and Gaza is Israel. It doesn't mean that you're not allowed to live here if you're not Jewish. No, but at the same time, it belongs to the Jews.

Right. So you're allowed to live next to us as a secondary person, but everything else is fine. Like, that's a Zionist mentality. There's plenty of Jews that aggressively disagree with that. And so one of the groups in that case, Torah Judaism, goes on to say, the text on the banner, conquer, settle when radical Zionists currently living in Israel looking forward to the end of the Gaza war, because when Gazans leave Gaza, which is their plan, and they stated this from the beginning, if you're listening, they will rush into a race to grab land in Gaza.

Zionists are lying to the eyes of the world. They use Tamas as an excuse to attack Gaza because their aim is to take over Gaza completely, which is their opinion. I agree, you know, part of that is what's happening. Here are Israeli politicians. They're saying, we want to colonize Gaza. This is in Hebrew. It's saying, in exchange for what they are doing, we will colonize the country.

There are already seven settlements aiming to settle the Gaza Strip. And yet, we are told that's racist to say it's happening. So crazy how obvious all this is. Here's the Israeli Minister of National Security. Ben-Gabir telling you that ethnic cleansing is how this is going to work, starting with a pilot of 100,000. After this pilot, I believe they can have a better lives in other countries. Like you were talking about killing, ethnic cleansing, displacement. All of these are open war crimes.

Here's another horrifying statement. It says while thousands of bodies of dead Palestinians still lie under the rubble, Israeli illegal settlers are openly on this newscast planning to move to Gaza as soon as possible, they're saying, publicly. They are ready to live in their tents or abandoned houses. They want to take over Gaza as quickly as possible. It's in Hebrew, where you can listen to yourself. They're openly talking about it. Now, here is the IDF illegally demolishing homes in the West Bank.

So if you really wanted to fully understand that this is not just about, you know, Hamas isn't in the West Bank. You can argue that they're sympathizers and so on, but this has been a very clear conversation. So the entire time they've been kidnapping, killing, letting settle, do whatever they want to, and now continuing the illegal destruction of their homes. It shows you that it's not just Gaza. It's all of occupied Palestine. They've already taken all of Israel, which is Palestine. Now the West Bank and Gaza are actively being removed.

IDF illegally demolishing homes in the West Bank during all of this for future illegal settlements. Are we still pretending this has anything to do with Hamas? This is them standing at the ruins of their home, which they make them pay for, by the way. they make them pay for the destruction of their own home. Here's another example. This is the West Bank. Currently, as Furcon writes, there can be zero explanation for this, zero justification. They are using bulldozers to bulldoze the roads in the West Bank.

Why exactly? Is that somehow, is how awesome of the roads? No, or are you just destroying their infrastructure? And your government's allowing this. Pretty much anywhere you are, to be quite honest, other than Yemen. Here, Cuds News Network breaks down. This is what the Israeli IDF members are saying.

From Hebron to Nablus, if you utter a word, we will crush your appearance. Oh, so you're going to kill anybody that says anything. The point is what they're saying is threatening people even in the West Bank if they speak out against this. Here is an illustrative photo. But what they're saying is the Commission of Detainees Affairs and Palestinian Society Prisoners Club say that Israeli forces have kidnapped at least 30 Palestinians in the West Bank just last night, the 24th, including former detainees, family members who are wanted. The point is, guys, just like I told you, the last little temporary pause, they've

scooped up far more since that, including the people they already let out. That's why their temporary pauses are nothing but an illusion. And these people are being charged with crimes. They're just being put in prison cells, as even the UN has broken down. Now, if you finish on a couple different points about both the ceasefire, but also quickly foreign policy. I found this interesting. Not only have we seen Yemen have a very strong effect against the importation of anything in Israel, Iraq has now shut down the port of Haifa, which is an important maritime gateway to Israel. So it's just showing you they are cutting this down.

By the way, using the same tactics that they have always been using against these countries individually. Suddenly, a little bit of just desserts, no? Here is the Ansaral leader, otherwise known as a Houthis to the Western governments. Since the beginning of our prepper operations in the Red Sea, this is the Yemeni government, 4,874 commercial ships have crossed. That's the important thing. They're acting like nobody's been able to do anything.

Nope, that's not the truth. They say which is a very large number during this period. We will continue our operations until food and medicine reach all parts of the Gaza Strip. The point is they're stopping currently Israeli-associated. And now, I'm not sure to what degree, but there is the U.S. and UK ships that they've already been targeting. not killing anybody.

In fact, not even seeking the ship. The Ocean Jazz one that they have the little skirmish with is, as far as I can tell, still moving. So the point is they're actively using kinetic but almost nonviolent tactics to stop these people from going through while the U.S. government responds with murdering people in Yemen, civilians, and Houthi members alike. But it's had a very powerful effect, and that's the whole point. heavy losses at the Israeli port. They're saying literally we don't even have ships anymore. That is why they're so terrified about this.

There's nothing to do with international shipping lanes because other people are still actively doing so. And I'll show you the clip of the image in a second. It's about specifically what they need to be able to relay this in Israel, which is what they've been doing to Syria, Iraq, everybody, cutting off the spy lines and choking them out. The ongoing crisis in the Red Sea is having a profound impact on the southern Israeli port of Eilat. which has experienced around $3 billion U.S. dollars in direct economic losses, as its key important export business has been brought largely to a halt by Houthi attacks. The port is southern Israel's only outlet to the Red Sea and one of the country's most critical trade ports.

All the cargo that come to a lot through Babelmandab from the Far East, it's mean China, Japan, Korea, India is not coming because the ships are afraid to go through to Babel Mandab. so we don't have any ships anymore from the 1st of December. The port mostly deals in the import of automobiles and the export of potassium fertilizer to the Asia-Pacific region. The crisis is also threatening Israel's two other international ports with the transshipment scope of all the country's ports reduced by 70%.

How long have we talked about? I was trying to find the map. I guess I didn't pull it up. It's not showing all the ships. I don't think you have to have an account on this one. You guys can look this up. The point is that right now, since I got the map, if I can show you, how long have we talked about this? This is the Red Sea.

Here's the Bob El Mandeb Strait. This has been the central reason, in my opinion, that they have been fighting to occupy all of Yemen to control this street, which is now currently one of the parts they're most afraid of. Right? Because ultimately, if they're coming in here, they usually go through the Suez Canal, through the Bobel Mandeb Mendeb Strait. You know, if you don't, if you can't maneuver this area, you have to understand, either through the Strait. Strait of Hormuz, the Boba Mandeb Strait, you have to literally go all the way around Africa or all the way around Asia. It's crazy the difference it makes. So the point is that they've shut this down now, both here as well as with the Strait of Hormuz, and also effectively kind of

firing around this area. Now, assuming Egypt doesn't somehow come on board as well, they have basically shut down the flow of goods and needs from militarily to Israel. I think that's important. So as this says, I totally reject, oh, here it is. I know I had some, I know out of an image. I said, I totally reject the Houthis claims that attacking ships from around the world is somehow linked to the conflict and gossip. They're so feeble about this. What do you mean, aside for the fact that they're telling you, that's why they're doing it? It's just so funny.

It's obvious that they're doing this to stop them. And they told you the moment that you press the ceasefire will stop this. And he just goes, I reject that because acknowledging that forces you to have to care about the genocide. But the point is you can plainly see there's a lot of traffic still going through. And that's why you can see ships. And again, this is the Bobel Mandib straight. You can see ships that are now putting up on their correspondent or whatever that not associated with Israel. And they let them go by.

Pretty interesting. Now, Arnod Batran rights absolutely unreal. The U.S. is, we have to have a laugh about this. Just like we talked about with Venezuela, right, where Guido is the only legitimate president. and anything else is a threat to our democracy until, oops, we need oil. So get out of here, Guido. We're going to work with Murdoro again. Nothing is sacred to these people.

So U.S. is now begging China to bail them out of the mess. They put themselves in with Yemen. Beijing's response, as per the article, is that, quote, the Red Sea tension is a spillover from the Gaza conflict, which should be ended as soon as possible. Exactly, which is the obvious reality. So what all China said was end what's going on in Gaza. And they're a problem solved, which it would be. The Gaza conflict, which the U.S. could end.

and tomorrow, if it finally dared to use its considerable leverage it as with Israel, but no, crazily enough, which shows you something, they'd rather go through the humiliation of begging their main geopolitical rival to bail them out rather than do anything to reign in Israel, which he says beggars belief. I think you realize that the Zionist government has something over the U.S. government, which, by the way, you can see that during the Epstein conversation, as was pretty much proven, a cost, was it a costa? I'm blanking on his name all of a sudden.

You know, and multiple other examples where they admit that he was both Mossad and CIA at the very least worked with both of them. So the point is it's part of that. And who knows what it is? Why you would literally ruin even your own support as Biden for the next election to keep this going. There's something else going on here. That's my opinion.

But think about what it would take for the U.S. to stand up and go, China, help. Instead of, I mean, it's just, it's unreal. You can read it for yourself. U.S. urges China to help curb Red Sea attacks. It's just pathetic. Turkey is now imposing economic sanctions on Israel. Turkey and NATO ally has decided to remove Israel from its list of export destinations. They're getting completely boxed out.

This is a good thing. Now finally, I want to end with this. Looks like we're going to get probably right to four hours. I've done it in a while. The call for ceasefire has now expanded in a lot of different ways, including groups like governors of Chicago, that previously would have been blocked step into the argument. And I think it's because, as I've always said, in this case, with this guy, it seems genuine to me. But most of them, and we should at least consider, that just because they say the thing that's right doesn't ever always mean, it doesn't always mean that it's because they care.

It's just that they recognize a political advantageous moment. Like I said with Putin in the past, is it that he is the good guy fighting for freedom or is that he recognizing and that ultimately playing that role is obviously powerful in contrast to the belligerence of the U.S. government. or you could mean both or can mean one or the other. You can decide for yourself. My point is that you're going to see a lot of people now calling for ceasefire. I think it's because they just go, well, I might get some negative points or some press pushback or loss of X, Y, and Z by making this line, but they'll win a hell of a lot of support from the people that can keep them in power. I think that's largely what's happening.

But this one, you'll see what I mean. The Labor Party counselor shaking while announcing he's leaving his own party because he just can't allow the genocide. I think this is important and I actually, my gut tells me that this guy means what he's saying but you can decide for yourself. Either way, people are standing up and pushing back. Came home yesterday, my five-year-old daughter

who was watching the news the previous night with me saw images of what was going on in Gaza. She said to me, Dad, what have you doing about the videos you was watching? That absolutely broke me. So today with a heavy heart, I have been an active member and supporter of the Labour Party all my life. Since the age of 14, I believe in its views and principles, but unfortunately under the current leadership, the Labour Party has let me down. I can no longer be part of this institution after a sport of an apartheid state that is killing thousands.

millions and people. I've been killed over 25,000 people in the last 200 days. It's with a heavy hour. I leave the pie I always loved. God, I hate that stupid TikTok thing.

It's lessens everything. But, you know, again, you never know. My gut tells me that is what a human being looks like. That is what a person who is confronted with the moral reality of what he's dealing with who just can't.

He has integrity. He can't stare his child in the face and say, I'm doing nothing to stop that. That's what he's doing. He's taking action at his own expense because he believes in that. That's what I feel that reality was. But at the very least, I know that there are people like that. I feel like that's what a lot of us are doing.

Putting your stick in your deck out, getting attacked for it, because this needs to stop. Now, I don't know whether attacks against me right now or related to this one topic or not, but I sure as hell feel attacked. Long before this, being censored literally everywhere, now being sued multiple times for nonsensical things because I think people are desperate to stop what's going on. Too late, though, cats out of the back.

But good for him for having the courage to stand behind his beliefs. I mean, what are you doing out there if you're listening to this? What are you going to tell your families when something goes forward? You look back and you say, I didn't do anything. The biggest genocide we've ever seen in lifetimes, if not one of the biggest ever going forward you know, in the context of, you know, per capita, however you want to frame it, clearly, unprecedented. What did you do to stop that?

Did you say anything? Did you just stand up for people? I sure as hell did. You sure as hell did. People were, we at the very least can remember that. Here, Megatron points out, Finland's foreign minister. Alina Veltonin in a message to Israel, quote, I will be clear, she says. Israel's time for self-defense.

is passed. Now, I disagree with that. There was never a time where this was self-defense, but regardless, she's simply saying that argument is over. Good for her, because it's a stupid argument to begin with when you're acting in the way against the entire population under a guise against one group, but it says enough is enough. The residents of the Gaza Strip needed a humanitarian ceasefire immediately. She added that the Israeli government, quote, did not do enough to protect them or didn't do anything, as amnesty proved in their own investigation. They targeted civilians. Megatron, this is, the Israeli government has not done enough to protect guys. I don't know why he wrote that.

Anyway, the point is this is what she's saying. A lot of people are standing up. Here's what I said before. You can listen to it for yourself. It's basically just him repeating it. But this is the mayor of Chicago saying he's calling for a ceasefire. Now, that's interesting to me. This is beginning to fall apart even in very specific ways.

British foreign minister, David Cameron. I mean, I don't trust any of these people. In fact, I know, I could, I would bet my life. that this is not him caring about this. This is him recognizing the writing on the wall, like I keep saying. He says, we want to see an immediate humanitarian ceasefire from which we can move to a sustainable ceasefire. But he goes on to say it's unrealistic to ceasefire while Hamas is able to fire rockets.

What are you talking about? It's a ceasefire. It means that they stop. If Hamas fires rockets, the ceasefire ends. So this kind of game they're playing where their very presence means you can't do it, it's an illusion. A ceasefire is necessary to extract the hostage. Right. And they're offering one for the hostages. And you guys keep saying no. Israel will not accept the Hamas running the Gaza Strip.

The point is he's acting like, but my point is showing you this is he's still towing mostly all the lines, but he suddenly started to shift into the ceasefire argument. They're all falling into it because they're cowards. They can't even pick a side and stick with it, right? But here's Russia as well. Calls for an immediate ceasefire. The Russian foreign minister insists that on an instant halt to hostilities and Gaza, deeming the displacement of Palestinians as intolerable. He emphasized the pressing requirement to establish a Palestinian state and expressed reservations regarding Israel's position on the two-state solution, which is that they don't care about it, don't want, it won't allow it. Venezuela, Maduro of all people.

Funny how all the evil bad guys are standing up for the innocent people being killed. It says, we cannot be silent. We will not be silent. Venezuela will continue to speak with its own voice to say stop the genocide against Palestinian people, ceasefire in Gaza, and Gaza. enough bombing, enough murder. And of course, here's what the U.S. had to say. General ceasefire, yes.

It's the same reason that we have in the past. We don't believe a ceasefire is going to be to the benefit of anybody but Hamas. Right, because we don't care about any of the civilians that are being murdered in real time that seemingly everybody, including your own allies, keep saying we need to do something about. Just realize what this shows you. the U.S. government is especially problematic in all of this. I mean, I'm an American. I can be honest about what my government is, just like there are a lot of Israelis that are willing to be honest about what their government is. We as the peoples need to recognize that we can be honest about this. They are not good people. They're actively using human life to achieve their own ends, and we can all see it. Now, right now, there's some level of this being used to call out what Israel is and always has been. the Zionist entity, but we need to start utilizing this momentum to do a lot more. We see this.

I know you see it. I know people watching this see it. I know people that are even skeptical about any number of other things we talked about are beginning to see it because it's being forced in front of you by everybody at this point. Their own media calling this out, discussing the lies. Well, every human rights group across the board, the United Nations, Oxfam, all of them, and now even U.S. allies, U.S. states, everybody and yet still it seems to continue. I think we just need to continue to push.

I mean, you can't just stop them from acting. They're going to continue to do what they're going to do, but we need to at the very least do our best to use the truth to try to change the situation because I'm just not okay with how many people are suffering. Nobody should be. And these are innocent people. So continue to stand up for people that don't have a voice. I just think it's monumentally important. But thank you for tuning in today, guys. I think this was an important show for a lot of different reasons, but we'll continue. As always,

we have a lot more coming out. I'm going to be putting out some extra post tomorrow, I believe. But if you'd like to support this platform, because, you know, despite the attacks on me and me personally and the platform, I'm never going to stop.

I'm always going to keep fighting for you because you fight for me. And if you'd like to support us, there's lots of ways down below to do so. So thank you for tuning in. I love you all. As always, question everything. Come to your own conclusions. Stay vigilant.

Thank you.