The Last American Vagabond - FDA Approves mRNA Flu Shot, Fauci Contempt Political Theater & The "Bacteriophage System" GoF

Starting point is 00:00:00 We have, we basically have two countries that have been fighting so long and so hard that they don't know what the doing. Do you understand that? It starts with a simple question and ends in objective reality. Through our journey from there to here, we find one another and ourselves. And as the next 24 hours breaks free from our last. We gaze onward in reflection of the day. Welcome to the daily wrap up.

Starting point is 00:00:55 Thursday, August 6th, 2026. Thank you for joining me today. You know, I thought I'd start with something a little bit funny today just because it kind of takes the edge off all the seriousness that's going on, you know? And it's kind of interesting. Another point, by the way, to reiterate that probably in the next couple of days will be putting out officially the AI transparency pledge that Derek and Whitney myself put together. And it's, again, I want to stress that it's really going to be about if people want to,

Starting point is 00:01:24 to outline to what level, if at all, you're using AI in your content. Not so much as like an all or nothing kind of a thing. But I mentioned the other day and said I got some comments and I wanted to put that back out there. And so like I said, I'm not going to be using AI for my pictures anymore, for any content creation, anything for the website. But, you know, there are people using it. I just thought that was humorous.

Starting point is 00:01:45 But the same light, you know, realize how much that is going to change the field. And there are people that are going to be using it to different variations. And that's, you know, it shouldn't, it's going to be a choice for everybody. Some people will think it's okay. Some people will find a middle ground. And that's going to be for them to decide. This isn't going to be about criticizing others outside of using it to create content. I find that to be sort of at least counterintuitive when it comes to what we do,

Starting point is 00:02:09 especially from a creative side. But I just want to announce that again based on that opening video. But we have a lot to talk about today. A bunch that I want to get to that I think is very relevant. I want to start a little bit on just an opening points that relate to sort of the new party direction, but two-party illusion. Some of the stuff I like to point out to begin with. And one interesting point that has to do with Glenn Beck talking about something that I find

Starting point is 00:02:31 so fascinating that we've been highlighting that we've gotten pushback from everybody on their side of the conversation and plenty of others around the idea that we're watching sort of a re and I mean not just recently with the straight of fromoose but since the beginning of this administration the continuation of the great reset or Trump you know reimagining the way the world operates or rebuilding this the global dynamic and I find it really interesting not even to say that that is what I truly think is what's happening in regard to Trump in a global sense absolutely but I want to talk about how he's framing this now is exactly you know frankly I think it's sort of a reactionary thing to make it

Starting point is 00:03:06 like Trump saying the global energy thing was why he was doing that or they floated it through the conversation. And I don't think that's what his plan was or even in his wheelhouse. I think it was used to make it look like he was doing something that made sense of all of this. But I want to make a point on the way Glenn is now shifting into that direction. I want to talk about some connections with that surveillance, ice, flock, and the connection to carbine that we've talked about. But an interesting point that I want to make yet again today as it is relevant to all the way it connects. I want to touch on Fauci, which and the contempt, congressional contempt, that I think is just complete theater.

Starting point is 00:03:42 Bouchy deserves to be in prison. And the fifth doesn't always mean someone's guilty, but in this case, I think it clearly does. And I think, in my opinion, it's something that was coordinated. Just my guess. But overall, I want to talk about what I think is going to happen with that and how I think it's very clearly, like, I mean deliberate theater. I think people involved, including people like Rand Paul,

Starting point is 00:04:01 know this is going nowhere and no better than to think that they can hold him in contempt for the Fifth Amendment. And specifically with this context. And I don't, this should not be taken as defending Fauci. A 100% degree that he should be held accountable, you know, should be going to prison for what he's responsible for, same with the Biden, Trump, all of them. But I want to go into why I think that's going to be nothing burger, if you will, the new MRNA flu shot that we've talked about twice already.

Starting point is 00:04:30 MRNA 101.1. We talked about this, I think about six months ago or eight months ago, then again, six months, seven, five months ago. I mean, as it was going forward and and the typical pushback from people that said, no, that's a bunch of Democrat holdovers. No, those are just FDA advisors. Fair points, but ultimately, here we are. And why that's what we expected, but shocking for some, which I'm not sure why. And an interesting follow-up to the whole phage bacteria system or bacteriophage system, different way to say the same thing that we talked about in the context of gain of function.

Starting point is 00:05:03 Now, even in the title today, I want to preface right out of the gate, that I'm still not suggesting that it is the same thing as gain of function. What I want to talk about, I'm going to bring it up again today in the latter half of the show because of something that just came out from BBC, weird timing. We were ahead of this story as well, just interestingly coming across our desk and then having this become some new story today where suddenly this big story is out where they've successfully made all of these bacteria infecting viruses that are completely safe to humans, which I disagree with.

Starting point is 00:05:33 And there's science that shows otherwise. But I want to go through that in a connection with not just the, we already highlighted it, but another piece that I found that even connects it directly to the use of gain of function studies. Now, last we went over it, there was multiple studies that I found that suggested that these things can be used in similar ways. Not to say that they're as dangerous as the typical gain of function, but that it's really, as I see it is a similar experimental direction that is rife with possible negative outcome that we wouldn't expect. And in very similar ways I would argue. But I made sure that it wasn't as, you know, all encompassing as that because I don't

Starting point is 00:06:10 think it's the same, but it's important to talk about because what else are they doing out there? And does this open the door to the same direction? And quite frankly, they didn't even stop gain a function as I hope you just saw our last show and many before that, which made that clear despite RFK Jr. pushing into that. Now, we're also going to talk about Iran. If, you know, honestly, if we don't have time, that'll be the first thing to get pushed off because, spoiler alert, we were correct about what we said last time. Trump's not involved in this negotiation. Iran and Oman are getting close to announcing, if not already, what they're going to do. And Trump is like, there's a thing going on and we're involved and everyone's sort of laughing at

Starting point is 00:06:44 it. Now, of course, I could be wrong. Everybody could be wrong. There could be some secret that comes out down the line, but based on the evidence and everything thus far, he's just spinning out. And it's really hard to watch. But we'll touch on that at the end today. But of course, we'll shout out to the person who made this clip. We started with this. It was on the opening thing as well. mad devil dog. It is his name on there too, unless he just put it on there after he found it,

Starting point is 00:07:08 which does happen on this platform. But it's just ridiculous looking. And, you know, there's something about these things that I just enjoy because these people take themselves so seriously. And they're really not as great,

Starting point is 00:07:19 grand and smart. And, you know, as every, they're really not even close to everything they try to frame themselves as. And that's not because they're all necessarily, you know, incompetent, but because they all have such a bombastic way that they present themselves

Starting point is 00:07:31 and how they frame themselves. and just so just to laugh at the stupidity of these kind of things. It's just, you know, and honestly, this, I'll start with this is why I even included this. I just thought it was kind of interesting because I was looking at this right before that. And I don't even know if that's where this came from, but I'm looking at his hair in this clip and I'm like, does that look different? Not that I would have even brought this up if it wasn't for that clip going around and the, and the office of the context of this tweet.

Starting point is 00:07:57 But I'm just like, his hair looks different. It looks fluffy. And at first I was like, is this stuff like kind of in the same vein of just, interesting thought. Like everyone would jump at any difference of Biden and say it's a different. It's a double. It's a lookalike. And truthfully, if you look through history, they all have something like that. Not to say that it's utilized in front of you and social media. I don't know if we ever proven that. But it's true that it's possible. That's not what I'm even saying. I just thought that was funny. And I'm thinking, oh, look, are they going to jump at that the same way and say, that's a different

Starting point is 00:08:22 Trump? It's not the same guy. That's why he's failing. Who knows? I'm sure somebody will. But that's the only reason because I thought that was funny. And I'm like, oh, man, somebody definitely picked up on that. Who knows? I could be wrong. Now, jokes aside, since I started with this clip before I get into some other opening points, this is Donald Trump talking about, actually I do, I think I have the clip here. Again, I believe, I don't even want to comment on it today, but weirdly enough, some of the issues we've been having today, I have a much larger show today. And I don't know really what changed.

Starting point is 00:08:51 Nothing on my end outside of the small things I've been doing around this. Zero issue today. More stuff popping up, more content, even the memory seems higher, but not a blip. who knows why. To me, that says something. I mean, there's no weird, there's no consistency with that. And so that would either mean the platform,

Starting point is 00:09:09 the providers, or something else in particular. I hope we don't continue to have those same problems, but since I bring it up, I'll just point that out. But the reason I say that now is if I have issue with these videos throughout, like I've been saying

Starting point is 00:09:20 last few days, please let me know, like real time, because I'll simply just stop the video and just explain it and move forward. But I don't believe we're going to have any issue today. I'm not really sure why the difference is. But I'm going to play this clip first, and then we'll read what DropSight News wrote. And it's just about Venezuela.

Starting point is 00:09:35 I mean, the question is, is this what you see? Well, two questions, really. Is this what you see this country as, rather more so you and the people, not the government, but this is what you see as what we represent as the people of this country and what they want to project to the world that we are as a country? And unsecondarily, even if you don't care about that, what Trump is saying here is simply not consistent with even what he presents as what he, you know, what he presents this country as. Freedom and liberty and, you know, doing the right thing. And so even if you don't care, realize that he has to lie about that as he stands up here

Starting point is 00:10:11 and just goes, to the victor go, the spoils. You know, you don't, that's not a sentiment that is consistent with liberty and freedom and democracy. And whatever the things he wants, all of our government like to project whether you like those things or not. It's not, guys. To the victor go the spoils, that's take what you want with power, right? That is archaic old school power all or nothing, military, military,

Starting point is 00:10:30 might, that's what they're doing. And maybe you agree with that. That's what they're trying to drive into your normal mindset is that that is okay. That's where we are. Matt, Steve Miller, sell, that's what we've always been. It's not, guys. That's what they've always been. But the world has struggled with trying to get away from a time where the powerful can just do what they want to the week. Maybe that's the way it'll always be. But I'd like to believe we can fight for something better. And I believe we've, you know, flirted with that over different centuries of people realizing what powerful people are doing. But to the victory of the spoils is not what he pretends we are as a country.

Starting point is 00:11:03 So I think that's relevant. Take it a lot of oil from Venezuela and we're getting along great with them. Billions and billions. Oh, and they're not, by the way. Venezuela people hate this because they're getting nothing from it. They're not stupid and everybody sees how this is going. If we see it, they see it, guys. They're not doing well.

Starting point is 00:11:20 In his mind, what's well is the oligarchs with his oligarchs. That's all he thinks about. When we're all doing great, the stock market's great and everything's great, he's talking about his circles, not you. And every American seems to be coming to terms with this. I'll point that out in a second. The barrels of oil is coming out of Venezuela. It's one of the most fertile places for oil in the world.

Starting point is 00:11:38 And as you know, it was a 48-minute war, lasted for... Was it a war? It was a regime change operation. Essentially, it was really more of a military intelligence operation. And yes, successful in the sense of them illegally taking control of the country. Is that successful in the minds of what Americans want? I mean, I would argue that most conservatives ultimately not the team sport blind whatever Trump says,

Starting point is 00:12:01 rah, raw people, but the ones that actually believe in what he was originally promising clearly did not want blunt, force, take what you want, we're in power. That's not what they presented them as them wanting. Maybe they did secretly,

Starting point is 00:12:12 but then even they have an issue with coming to terms with what they really want versus what they project. That matters. And we paid for the war with what we've taken out many, many, many times.

Starting point is 00:12:23 Where have you heard? Well, they haven't actually. You know why? Because only a fraction of that money has actually been verified to it. No, Corey, it could be secretly being done, but is that helping you or American? No, that money is being dumped into the market to try to offset the absolute failure of what they're doing. Everyone can see that.

Starting point is 00:12:38 And the reality is even if they haven't, that money is not made its way into helping Americans in any way, shape, or form. That before. You haven't heard that before. It's the old fashioned way, right? It's the old fashioned. Old fashion, which he means no, you know, no moral guidance. Just we're going to go in and take what we want because we won. So, fine.

Starting point is 00:12:57 that just really take what he's trying to do right there, guys, that they're okay. So, okay, here's the best way to frame that. By that logic, if for whatever reason another country just became powerful enough, and guess what, guys, there are some that you might not understand are capable of that today and just said, you know what? We're going to take Florida because we can. What would you do? Well, Trump says, that's just the way it works, right?

Starting point is 00:13:17 That's the way the things are. Stephen Miller says, that's just the way world works. And maybe you think it is. But then you cannot be, you know, you can't stand up and then go law. And that's ours. and that's sovereignty, because those things don't mean anything when you believe what Trump believes right there. Do the victor belong to spoils, right? Belonged the spoils.

Starting point is 00:13:38 He can't even use old like adages without hubris. I just find that humorous. And we're doing the same thing, by the way. The lovely Islamic Republic of Iran, we're doing, we're not going to hell out of it. What's funny is the lovely Islamic, you know, that's just funny. He's just, I don't think this guy barely. understands half the stuff he gets into. He's just kind of going off talking points and repeating things because that statement doesn't make sense with whatever, you know, anyway, the bottom

Starting point is 00:14:04 line is that this, we're going to come back to this, opening quick point because of the hair thing, to be honest, but I just think it's very clear what they are projecting as what we are. And that's not the case. I don't believe most Americans want this. That's why most Americans vote no, or rather, you know, polling whatever to war. If most Americans wanted to the victor go the spoils, and by the way, you are not the victor, you don't get. the spoils, the oligarchs do, you get nothing and you get hated for it. The point is that if that's what most people wanted, they would vote yes for more war, wouldn't they, guys? It's not what Americans want. Not Republicans, not Democrats, not people who are aware how stupid it all is. Nobody,

Starting point is 00:14:42 guys, not the majority at the very least. President Donald Trump has said to the victor belong to spoils would justify the United States seizure and control of Venezuelan oil. He boasted that the initial conflict lasted 48 minutes and that the U.S. has already recouped the war expenses. The U.S. government has seized and generally, more than $13 billion from the sale of Venezuela and crude since taking control of the country's exports. Only about $300 million has been officially and publicly traced. Now, everyone along around Trump is going to go, do you know where it's gone? Are you in Trump's inner circle? Then shut up, you don't know. That's the kind of thing you get today. Hashtag democracy. The point is,

Starting point is 00:15:16 that's not how that's supposed to work. So you're asking us to blindly assume that people in power are just doing the right thing with billions of dollars that we can't prove? Nobody agrees with that guys. So that's what this game they push about how you're just supposed to blindly trust the team. That's not what anybody really thinks. Not even most of the team. You can literally see this any back away from the current moment. The funds are being kept in a dedicated U.S. Treasury account. According to the statements made by Rubio, the money moves through a city bank account, perfect, and audited by the accounting firm, KPMG. Congressional Democrats led by House Oversight Committee Ranking Member Robert Garcia escalated the investigation into the administration. But they don't

Starting point is 00:15:55 care guys. It's about trying to make them look bad. I mean, if I'd like to be wrong, whether it's left or right, to just see criminals go to jail, but realize that ultimately, when has anybody ever actually ended up in jail? Is that not the simplest thing to look at? Because all this stuff flies around and ultimately, not even Fauci, which we'll get to in a minute. That's what I believe. But anyway, okay, so one quick point I want to start with. Somebody reached out to me. And I've been keeping up on this because of some weird changes and stuff, censorship that's been happening on BitShoot, comments being censored underneath the podcast that I was kicked out of for ideas that the host and now financial backer of BitShoot didn't like that I was saying.

Starting point is 00:16:33 It just speaks poorly for where this is going. And I still support what the original mission anyway. But now somebody reached out to me and said, hey, BitShoot just canceled a bunch of your subscribers. Looks like it may be permanent too, not sure. So I'll point it out. Frustrating, isn't it? Now, I wasn't able to get an archive of anything reasonable new. And I think that may be somewhat relevant.

Starting point is 00:16:53 but ultimately the last one I was able to get, it's 2024, showing 37,280. That's 2024. As it currently stands, it's at 38.7. It was higher than that. I just not able to get. If you can find an archive, send it to me. But that's frustrating, guys. Who knows?

Starting point is 00:17:09 It could be one person back there who seems to hate me for very personal reasons. As they talk about Zionism and globalism on a show that's about what's going on in the world, Bruce Vindon and Dennis Kucinich, and ultimately I get hated off the show by one person because those ideas apparently rubbed in the wrong way. I don't know, but it's frustrating. I'm not going to say that I know that. All I'm pointing out is that this is something that happened and somebody's pointing out to me,

Starting point is 00:17:29 and that over there happened as well. Now, if they're connected, who knows? But it's frustrating because it was one of the platforms and it still is, hopefully, that it really fights for the mission of free speech, even to the detriment of the platform. And yet you get somebody who comes in with a mainstream business-type mindset

Starting point is 00:17:45 and takes in a direction so far that's going wrong. Even the idea of, I was told, they were leaning away from the streaming direction. I mean, the whole thing. It just bothers me. You know, why, honestly, like just as a personal moment, because I was involved with the Super You platform and not like a financial side just as an advisor because I believe in the person that was doing it and what they were trying to accomplish. And ultimately, it just got thrown away because the person died very mysteriously.

Starting point is 00:18:11 And ultimately, the family just decided to wrap the whole thing and just sell it for its parts. When, in fact, the thing would have been profitable to sell as a whole. I just feel the whole thing went super weird. It was, I mean, it was Jimmy Dorr and the Duran and myself and plenty of others that had pretty good reach. And that platform was building. And then he died. You know, and it just makes me sad. Anyway, that's why things like this get to me because it's hard to, you know, and honestly, this is why I have a hard time, you know, and I probably never will find, you know, believe in a politician.

Starting point is 00:18:42 Because things like this continue to happen and it makes you jaded. Historically, though, it seems like an accurate stance to take when it comes to platforms or anything else. But continuing, start with the point from Massey here, where he says, Trump expand, this is some two-party illusion stuff that I want to include, just to his, Trump expands is based by welcoming, Epstein's lawyer, Alan Dershowitz, but that's not new. Alan Dershowitz has been a part of Trump's team forever. So I just think it's funny that it's like, I'm getting a lot of weirdness right now from Massey, from Tucker, and not necessarily dishonesty.

Starting point is 00:19:15 But do you not notice, let me ask, let me ask this. Do you notice a shift in the way the content's coming out now that they're like America, you know, what do they call it? America First Party? I have. And I've noticed like a weird, like Rand Paul and, you know, comes out and goes, Bill Gates has never been held accountable. And it's like, well, okay, good.

Starting point is 00:19:32 I agree. But what's this kind of, they feel like our congressmen are now acting like the red light, holy crap guys with the way that their content's coming out. Because it's a lot of like that and outrage and, but no follow through action. Yes, Bill Gates sort of like we just saw Tucker point out. he's unhappy and that's enough and Fauci's probably very unhappy and that's that's accountability. It's like that's not true. And Gates is not, clearly he's been benefiting wildly from Trump.

Starting point is 00:19:57 I mean, this administration more than ever, multiple meetings. I mean, I did the whole thing last time. He's very clearly in the inner circle. He's benefiting wildly from his connections. So it just feels like a weird choice. Anyway, back to this. Alan Dershowitz into MAGA, which really, as you know, is the Trump side of this that I don't think is even close to what the MAGA momentum was about. those are people that now see the Trump lied to them. Either way, the idea is, you know,

Starting point is 00:20:20 Alan Dershowich, scientist, bad. I agree. But I'm very on guard to where this next thing goes. Now, here's Luke Krodowski saying, what do you think about Tucker Carlson's 10 point plan? You know, very insightful work. And the bottom line is a screenshot from Tucker that lists off the things that he's saying. Okay. As the, as the, this is the whole podcast, by the way, the Patriotic Blonde simply says, based. And I said, you know, consider the possibility because she's the one that was supporting Trump and ultimately, you know, called him out after he double crossed everybody. And I said, consider the possibility that he is playing you just as Trump did. I truly hope he's genuine, but at least consider that he's only promising what we want to hear in order to gain support for the next political team that doesn't care about American interests. I'm not saying that's what I think is most likely, but certainly something we could consider as we, as a lot of people just went through a process of going to,

Starting point is 00:21:14 Trump promised all these great things and we believe and it's going to happen. And then he didn't follow through. You know, sort of like every politician of my entire life. Who knows why this took this one to wake certain people up. But either way, I think that's interesting. So back to this, you know, yeah, Tucker's making it putting out things like this that say fair. Same rule should apply to presidents, federal agents, people like Jeff. Yeah, who's going to disagree with that?

Starting point is 00:21:36 Now, I'm not again, maybe if he believes this, that's fantastic, guys. But why would it be like, oh, look, the things, the good things, democracy, freedom, and and free speech. great. Now, we shouldn't believe a single word people say until we see action that backs it up, especially today. But I feel like this is starting all over again. Sovereign. Carlson claimed Israel pushes the U.S. into Iran war through bribery and threat. You know, it's real easy to call these things out now, now that everybody sees them and now that everybody's looking, you know, but will that happen? Productive. America should rebuild farming, manufacturer, craftsmen. Well, Trump said basically all of this. beautiful carlson alleged the urban planners deliberately uglified american cities and portrayed

Starting point is 00:22:16 blue to those darge these are all some of these seem specific to you know like it's like this i i don't even want to go through all this because frankly who we'll wait and see when he actually does anything even when he's running if that happens this will mean nothing to me until he does something sure promises matter because you've got i mean of course if you guys think voting still has an outcome i mean that's you know i'm not even getting into us right now because we're so far We're so far from anything actually happening with this. But, I mean, half these people that are promoting it are ones that would have called out how the voting system is broken. Our voting machines are probably, you know, but now we're like, yay, vote for the next team.

Starting point is 00:22:51 But anyway, I mean, you can clearly tell that I'm jaded with the system. I'm not saying we shouldn't care, but realize that going through the motions is not the answer. It's a hamster wheel. It's a system that is broken. And the only way to win a broken game is to not play. Or the rather, the only way to not lose a rigged game is to not play. healthy. Carlson embraced RFK Jr's food agenda, called for universal sobriety and said the widespread use of drugs such as annex, Adderall, S.R.I. I have left Americans half adult. Now, called for you versus sobriety. That means he's going to say you're not allowed to take any drugs, which would be an infringement on your freedom, right? Whether, and currently in this country, there's all sorts of laws against that. But what are we talking about when it comes to actual freedom. Or let's be real, all of these other things are things people can prescribe. But again, I shouldn't even go in each one of these. I don't believe that most of this will be what actually comes to pass. Government officials should be punished for lying to citizens.

Starting point is 00:23:39 Yes, great, do that. Optimistic, Carlson argued that having children is a biological imperative and the foundation of long-term thinking while blaming aging and childless elites for Paul. So now, you know, that's very personal. Now, you can, that's an opinion that we think that people should have children, but that's not something, you know, that's like running on, I'm like, we should believe in one side argument, you know, that this is what the Christian Wright thinks.

Starting point is 00:24:02 It's just weird, right? Like, that's not something that's going to align with people in the country as a whole that you have to choose. It should be about you have the right to choose what you want. That would be the right way to stand to put that. But I'm not saying this is his running campaign, just what he's putting out is things that need to change. So that's why I'm trying to make it.

Starting point is 00:24:17 I'm not trying to make this about breaking it down for his next campaign. But I guess, like I said, I shouldn't even be going through each one. It's about the idea that you're putting out things that people think and probably believe in. Like, it's like, okay, it's like doing this right Trump came out with his plan and going, oh my God, what do you think? Trump's the best.

Starting point is 00:24:35 Now look at where we are. What meaningful matter did that have? What effect did it have on anything? What did it mean to do that back then? What does it mean to do this right now? My answer? Nothing. Literally nothing.

Starting point is 00:24:48 But that's where it's going. So here's Trump. And there's points that will relate back to that as we go through today. But here's Trump. As I argue right now, Trump is probably one of the most universally dislike people. Like, that's true, guys. Oh, nice. So the homeless left just came in.

Starting point is 00:25:04 I didn't know what this even was until yesterday on Rumble, by the way. Steve Durdo a few days ago. Steve told me. So thank you for bringing over your audience. It's awesome. But the point here, guys, is that I honestly am starting to wonder whether I even need to continue highlighting the dishonesty of Trump or the, you know, some need to see it. So I probably still will. Like there's even the one person out there that's still being misled. But it's like, am I wasting my time? Are we all just like, yes, Trump's ridiculous. And he's a, he's, it's like people who disagreed that Biden was senile. You know, there's some. They existed. And they probably still lie to themselves. But the vast majority, including left, because we all

Starting point is 00:25:36 saw after the fact when they were forced to admit it, knew that. So am I wasting time? I don't know. But some of these points still seem relevant in a larger sense. So really quickly, I'll just read this. Mario propaganda here says, Trump just unloaded on new Democrat Senate candidate, Abdul al-Said, which, by the way, it's not even, it's not a difficult name to it. So these people are acting like it's some kind of a weird, they're just playing into the rate, the, you know, the division tactics of the race to make you whatever his name is. It's like, It's just, that's very stupid and petty. Like, whether you hate Muslims or not, that's a point about whether this person, you know,

Starting point is 00:26:13 anyway, it's, there's so much division. And I, you know, the idea ends up being using the different things that drive a wedge between us, whether or not it's even relevant, you know? Like back to that point with Trump, shouldn't it be about what he's claiming he's going to do? And then we should be holding him to the feet to the fire and what he actually does, not just that he's a Muslim and he hates Jews and this is his name and you are jihadist. It's just dumb. Like the level of discourse.

Starting point is 00:26:36 in this country. Not the people you understand, but the discourse of the so-called leadership and upper echelon is just like the dumbest thing I've ever seen, at least so far in this country. Like it's been so, and again, I think in a larger sense, that's being done to us. But he says, he's a man of hate. He doesn't love Israel. Interesting. He doesn't love Jewish people. He hates them with a passion that burns in his heart. That's what Trump just said. That's not a thing he can do about it because he hates them. Safe to say, Trump doesn't like him. Well, here's the thing, guys. I don't support any of them. I'm going to go on to show you that just like Mom Donnie, I think this guy's just playing into a demographic that recognizes

Starting point is 00:27:15 Israel. That's the opportunism I keep talking about. So you can get it in some ways where he's like, good, Israel bad. We're going good. Great. You can see it. But then what does he do? He talks about continuing to censor based on any kind of hate speech. He talks about supporting the Ukraine war. So really, all you get is, yes, Israel's bad. Now, even then, does he follow through with that? Mom Doni sure didn't. He's still talking about censor. for anti-Semitism. He's still pulling back on his promises to arrest Netanyahu, and we'll see where it goes. At the end of the day, he may be better than Randy Fine in regard to Israel, but when it really comes to what happens to Americans, is he any change?

Starting point is 00:27:49 Who knows? Because here's my thought on this. You can say all this stuff, and it's just like, it's like saying Roger Stone hates Jews and wants to see them all killed. Is that what he's ever said? No. Is that, or like Corbyn or anything? In fact, they don't even think that. but because you go, oh, look, he said Palestine's wonderful. That means all these things right here. And that's just insultingly stupid. Now, Trump doesn't even care, but it's true. That's the talking point.

Starting point is 00:28:14 That is because politics and that's how it's played. You say, and they all think that. Now, here's what's crazy. I'm not supporting this guy, and I'll show you why in a second. But it's interesting with the contrast. Here are some things that he just said when direct, asked explicitly about Israel and Jews. And then you're going to laugh.

Starting point is 00:28:31 And then you can look at this and go, what is he talking about? So where would this come from? Where would it come from to say he hates Jews with a passion and wants to see them all killed? Israel. There's really no other way or people that are pro-Israel who want to remove a guy who's not. Or at the very least to drive this very clear if you are anti-Israel, you hate Jews narrative, whether or not all people involved support the larger government agenda. So here's what he's just said in regard to speaking with CNN about this.

Starting point is 00:28:59 There are five for us, what your position is on funding for Israel if you do become a U.S. Senator. Are you opposed to all funding for Israel, period, military funding? I'm opposed to unconditional military aid for any country. That is Israel, yes, but that's also Egypt where my family immigrated from. That's Pakistan, that's Saudi Arabia, that's UAE. And that's not because of a focus on what's happening anywhere except for a focus, what's happening here. We've got community. Oh, so actually America first.

Starting point is 00:29:30 Now, not even saying he means that, guys, but that's what if he was going to follow through, what an actual America first stance would be, right? Not specific wedge issues, but just generally speaking, whatever he thought was best for the country first. And in a genuine sense. You know, but the idea, why is it even starting with the, would you feel Israel with defending Israel and funding Israel? Like, it's weird on its face that this is the focal point, guys. Why is that the focal point? Because our politicians and our media and our establishment has made,

Starting point is 00:30:00 that more important than your interests, even as there's a epidemic of people going America first. You really can't miss that. And that's why this has become so haywire. With the NDAA and everything else, it's just all coming to a head. It feels desperate. In my state where the median income is $14,000. And I believe they have a right to their tax dollars. I also believe in international law and upholding international law. And there are Leahy laws against dealing arms to countries who are engaged in human rights abuse. And you'd think that this would be like, oh, well, obviously, if he actually meant it, right? Like what she or her response would be like, well, clearly, that's a great answer.

Starting point is 00:30:39 Yes, they're breaking the law. Yes, they're committing war crimes. So clearly, if there's a law that says you can't give funds to work criminals, then that would be obvious. Now, you don't even call it a genocide if you don't want to. If anyone's pretending, including CNN, which they're not, by the way, that there's no war crimes being committed by Israel, well, then sure, make the argument. But see, the idea is none of that matters because your follow-up is, I'll let us speak for itself. And I don't want to fund a foreign military that does genocide, apartheid, or has taken us to a war we don't need to fight.

Starting point is 00:31:10 I believe in equal rights to peace, dignity, and self-determination for Jewish Israelis and Palestinians alike. I believe our responsibility, though, more than anything else, is to use our tax money here in Michigan to provide health care in Michigan and schools in Michigan and roads in Michigan, rather than to send it to a foreign government that might. might use it in the form of bombs and tanks to destroy infrastructure and schools and hospitals there. And what's weird is that this whole thing they do with this kind of thing, it's sort of like when peers would be like, but do you condemn them us? It's as if this, it's almost as if they are going like, we all know you don't mean that. We all know that you really just hate Jews.

Starting point is 00:31:44 And so your tricky answer is to be like, but I care for everybody. It's like the whole, all lives matter to black lives matter. We know you hate black people. It's like, that's not true. It can be. But this game is, it is political manipulation. and people fall for it. Here's what she says after all of that.

Starting point is 00:31:59 Now, you can argue he doesn't mean it, but there's not a single example where you're going to find him going, Jews are bad and we should kill him. That's not out there. They're simply going, he likes, you know, he's a Muslim and he thinks Palestine should be free. So that completely converts to all Jews shouldn't exist.

Starting point is 00:32:14 That's not true. And frankly, I don't even think most Zionists believe that. Some people might hear that and say, well, does he support, you know, funding defensive systems like the, Iron Dome in Israel? I mean, that's her actual follow-up, guys. That's not a joke. That's not cut.

Starting point is 00:32:31 He goes through all the answer about how we should care about Americans first and the money should be here first. And on top of that, we shouldn't be sending money to people committing war crimes, especially since laws in our own country say we shouldn't be doing that. Some people would hear that as you don't want defensive either. What do you say to that? I mean, I would laugh. I would literally laugh on that show and be like, are you seen?

Starting point is 00:32:51 Did you? I just have to make a point about that. But, you know, he's been doing the rounds. And again, I frankly have, I don't believe in these people. So I don't think, like, I don't know. I'll leave it there. But watch his response. Do you?

Starting point is 00:33:05 I don't believe that there's really a difference between offensive or defensive weapons. And I also don't believe it's my responsibility to buy defensive weapons for a foreign government. When our kids are defa- Now watch, watch as he ultimately ends up voting for that with some kind of about, you know, oh, but this and oh, it's a writer on a bill, whatever. I hope him wrong, but watch. But so it's just crazy that he has to go through. But like, why do I have to explain this?

Starting point is 00:33:30 Fenceless against schools that have been underfunded for a very, very long time. My responsibility is the next senator from Michigan, his children in Michigan, rather than thinking about what's in the interest of a foreign government. Okay. So that's a yes that you are against funding to things like the Iron Dome. Yeah, yeah, because I just said that. Like, she just wants him to state it because the entire point of this. was to get the gotcha moment where, see, he said it, they don't let he hates Jews.

Starting point is 00:33:58 And this is CNN. Fox, CNN, it's the same deal, guys. It's all the same thing. I just can't believe that that's the answer. And it just, it's so transparent. Like, if you're her, you're thinking, like, you know, anyway, like, the question is, is she in mind with that or is she a mindless followers told by the editors to say, you know, who knows?

Starting point is 00:34:17 But that's, I'd be embarrassed if I were her. And frankly, I don't think they even care. I am against it in large part because I just, see, she's, like, oh God, no, he's Jews. Got it. I just don't understand why anybody thinks it's the right thing to do to send our tax dollars abroad to fund foreign militaries when our own kids barely get to go to schools that are functional. Yeah, crazy, right? He hates Jews, obviously. You know, that's about how dumb this is. Now, what's crazy, though, is you almost want to look at this, like presenting him as such an obvious counterbalance to all the absurdities so that you lean into

Starting point is 00:34:48 him like a Gabbard, like a Massey, you know? And again, I don't know if Massey will pan out or not, but so many of them, RFK Jr., have ultimately come with all the promise and then just nosedive right into the same old problem. So maybe that's the point. Don't know. Now, my suggestion is not to just ignore him and not follow. Hope. Have hope for Tucker.

Starting point is 00:35:08 Have hope that he means what he says. Just don't blindly then follow along. Be more, hold them to account more than anybody because do you believe in them? I mean, that has to be the way this works. So again, he hates Jews. He's a man of hate. He doesn't love his really ones. He doesn't love Jewish people.

Starting point is 00:35:28 Like, what a weird thing that you have to require to love anybody when you're, you know, it's just, but obviously his point is he hates him with a passion that burns in his heart. It's just weird. And you have to realize that somebody pulling Trump strings or just giving him talking points and he's just too dumb to not repeat them. Who knows? Here's another one posted by voice of rabbis.

Starting point is 00:35:46 And this is a count that I've pointed out many times in the past that is a very prominent, you know, in this, this is a smaller one. Oh, 319.9. They've got up quite a bit. But there's a couple of them, and they're associated with the Orthodox Jewish communities that protest Zionism and Israel and other places in the world.

Starting point is 00:36:01 And this Jews united against Zionism. Pretty prominent account. He's on this video. I don't think I have it. Oh, I did. Okay. And what's weird about this is, he says, I love Judaism.

Starting point is 00:36:13 I love the Jewish people. So what a stupid thing to have Trump come out and say that? So again, you could argue he's lying. But at what point do you get the other side of that? You don't. Right? And so I just feel like this is all kind of orchestrated, not in the sense of, I shouldn't say orchestrated, but just sort of there's a guide, there's a guidance to this and they're playing their roles in it. And Israel are not the same as Judaism and the Jewish people.

Starting point is 00:36:45 Judaism and I love the Jewish people. He's right, right? That's the whole point I'm making. But is this guy simply tapping into things that we're doing and saying that just, you know, anybody like us doing that in order to. gain support. That's what you should be questioning. Hoping for the best, questioning and hope and watching for the worst. I venerate Judaism and I venerate the Jewish people. I stand with Judaism and I stand with the Jewish people. And the single, and the single most dangerous thing that they've tried to tell us is that somehow they can extend the definition of anti-Semitism to include

Starting point is 00:37:22 a foreign government and its leaders. I call bullshit. I mean, I mean, it's, well, I guess we'll find out whether he means what he's saying, right? But the same point applies is that ultimately he's already been clear as a video I just played last time that he says, you know, so it was asked in another, um, corporate interview. And they simply said, you know, same kind of thing she did. And he makes the clear point. That's, that's, you know, hold on. I just left a train of thought on it. It was, that's weird.

Starting point is 00:37:53 It just completely slipped my mind. Well, I mean, the general point is the same is that, you know, there, there's other. examples of him, oh, that's what it was, the censorship is they said, you know, well, are you going to help to offend Jews who are being attacked and so on? And his point was like, look, we will continue to, what was the word he used? Basically, the suggestion was what the actions are taking against people who are saying things about Jews, or at least that they frame that way, even though we talk about Palestine in many cases, is the same actions against people who do it against Muslims or do it against Christians. And it may sound like a nice answer, but the truth is,

Starting point is 00:38:24 that means, okay, then we're going to censor hate speech everywhere, which was always, the point, guys. It was always the point. It's just more of a focal point when it comes to anti-Semitism. It's still just an open door to censor and remove people that don't agree with the government agenda like we saw during Israel, Khalil and Ozturk, who were simply going genocide. And they almost got deported. Garcia basically did. The other two got arrested and held for a long time. So, and this was the secondary point. We must defend democracy in Ukraine and win it at home, too. authored by Abdul El-Said, defend democracy in Ukraine.

Starting point is 00:39:03 Didn't you just say that we were talking, not money to Israel? Is that now because Israel is enough that you see as the other side of the agenda, but you think Democrats want to defend Ukraine? It's hypocritical, guys. It's a principle. So, again, my point is we'll see when it comes to pass.

Starting point is 00:39:20 But as this guy says, Nick Cruz says, congratulations, you guys elected another senator who will send more money to Nazis and Ukraine, which is Israel, guys. It's the same overlapping point. I just don't believe it. So all that's not about supporting a politician or not, it's about showing, seeing through it all,

Starting point is 00:39:34 and that Trump is calling him a Jew hater, and this side is going to, you know, it's meant to create the very same game we've always been trapped in, or I guess elongated, continue it, or at least just as long enough to get us into what's coming next. But you know what'll stay the same? Because nobody's asking for anything different. We're just going through the same hamster wheel,

Starting point is 00:39:51 the left and the right. As your mark says, Americans are now spending more on taxes than on food, clothing, housing, combined. No big deal, right? The golden age, isn't it? How wonderful. And meanwhile, rent costs.

Starting point is 00:40:03 U.S. rent prices versus income. Look at it, look at it as it continues to skyrocket. And look at the difference. Look at the gap for the podcast. It ends on 2023 and it just simply shows you where it has continued to. And it's only worse right now. Going up. Okay.

Starting point is 00:40:24 So on that note, do you feel like this is being, the world is being reimagined in a better way, the benefit of Americans, or maybe just the benefit of Trump's inner circle? Even that. Is that happening? Maybe they're profiteering, maybe, but interesting point. Sharon, Shannon Joyce shared this. Glenn Beck is wrong, she says. I agree. She says Trump is a criminal. This is not 12D chess. There's no trust the plan. Just stop, Glenn Beck. No one's buying it anymore. Well, some are hoping into it, hopium, as it were, but Glenn Beck, Donald Trump is changing the new world order entirely. What do you mean? See, this is what's funny. These guys, I think, are just desperately trying to tap into it.

Starting point is 00:41:00 I see them as much as they're still very influential, especially with a certain aging demographic. But the point is that I feel like they're tapping into what they think will gain them some kind of momentum as a sort of a dying thing. But when you see changing the New World Order, what does that mean? The New World Order, well, first of all, it depends on if you want to talk about it, like it's an organization, which is what the old stool kind of, you know, that's how they used to frame the conspiracy theorists.

Starting point is 00:41:24 It's all the New World Order like a group versus a new world order. order, which is a general sentiment that governments have put out in Reagan, plenty about, you know, a change from like post-World War II to, you know, that's where we are right now, sort of a new war, talking about the multipolar versus the poll, you know, that's the idea. But changing the new world order is a weird way to frame that. I just think he's trying to tap in with a certain group of people that want to hear the buzzwords. But I also think it's about him trying to tell you or sell you on the idea that Trump is a mastermind. And we already talked about this, guys.

Starting point is 00:41:54 This is just him jumping on the bandwagon way too late, in my opinion. Trump is reorganizing the global dynamic with all of his actions and not just spinning out as a, as, you know, losing and overstepping and blindly following Netanyahu into his own detriment. You can decide, but the one thing I think is hilarious, whatever it is, is that one thing we've been considering, not blindly going, this is happening like an Alex Jones or Glenn Beck, but talking about the possibility is exactly of this, haven't we? Right? The idea, that's the one best one to read. Trump and the Zionist, Zionist globalist technocrats are building your new society. whether you like it or not,

Starting point is 00:42:32 2025, December, and it goes before that. And these are just my opinions about what I think we're seeing with the network state agenda, with the new board of peace. But what I think is hilarious is so many people in their circles

Starting point is 00:42:44 and in their audiences were like, you guys are just a bunch of haters, you're just trumped arrangement syndrome. He's not the great reset. He's not doing that. And now you get Glenn Beck coming out and telling you that what I've been saying the entire time is actually correct.

Starting point is 00:42:57 And now even though what it seems like now was different than what I was thinking at that point. Same thing Alice Jones is doing right now, guys. I just think this is hilarious. And what you'll never get from any of this or anywhere, it seems, is the girl to going, look at how crazy it was that Ryan was saying this back in January. Oh my God, look at him calling out. All the conservatives are shifting sides back then when nobody was pointing it out.

Starting point is 00:43:17 I don't need that because we're going to continue to do the job regardless. But I think it's hilarious to me that that's how the system works. And that's why it's artificial, at least in one of the many parts. I'll play just a little bit of this. explain to me what you mean when you say that these are indications that president trump is resetting the world order and the implication of that don't trump now first remember that she on the left was one of those people holding up the most transparent administration in history epstein binders that's her that's one of the people that was telling you that the epstein story was coming down and trump's going

Starting point is 00:43:50 to show us and then gas let everybody to ignore it when trump said so so that's why she's here just in case that was unclear um is changing the new world order entirely. And it won't be fully understood for probably another five to 10 years. Well, isn't that convenient for Glenn Beck's prediction that as it happens, you just get to keep keeping people on the hook for maybe when that comes to pass. And hope that you don't wake up in some kind of technocratic hellscape because Ben Glenn Beck told you that you would be, you know, the golden age. So wait a minute, how are we in the golden age right now, Glenn? As you've pointed out before when Trump said it, when we're building this

Starting point is 00:44:26 thing that's going to be the nice endpoint for everyone to be happy. How's that work? These guys will say whatever they need to say. That's what they do, guys. Frankly, I just see it in this guy's eyes. If you want my honest opinion, it's my gut that there's a twindling, look at Ellis Jones. Look at his audience. Like it's obvious. These people have, whatever they were tapping into, they've lost the control of it. And people are seeing through them. That on top of the, he says it's over $20 trillion of investment. Let's to say it's 10 trillion. Isn't it interestingly, 20 trillion is a huge chunk. And actually before the Iran war

Starting point is 00:44:58 and maybe the last administration, that's about where the debt was. $10 trillion in building new factories here at home. So we are making things again. What is that? Where are you talking about, man? So there's just some hypothetical number that you claim is there that we can't verify,

Starting point is 00:45:16 but it's going to be used to rebuild the country after we destroy everything else. After we allow the technocrats and Zionist to control us, it'll all work out in the end. give it five years, you'll build some factories. What do you think, guys? Even supporters of Trump, does that make that feel like that makes sense right now? And are you willing to just hope it'll all work out in the end?

Starting point is 00:45:36 With AI, with the rebuilding of factories, with the dominance of energy and oil. Oh, yeah, yeah, and how's that working out? Now, yes, I too considered the argument. And who knows? We'll see. But that's not how this is working out, guys, very clearly. reasons why. So with the argument, well, I'll let him finish. He's a point to say here that I think is relevant about what it all comes down to, that it's all gamble with your country, your lives,

Starting point is 00:46:04 your freedom, your everything, just to hope that it ends up from the benefit. Sorry, gang, but the world doesn't work without real energy, without gas, LP, and oil. Oh, it absolutely does. Just not in the way that these people want it to. I mean, it's just going to be real about it. You could live your life without any of that stuff. Yes, a lot of electricity and convenience and all that. I'm not saying you should, it's your choice. But the idea that the world only works one way. And you could even talk about different forms of energy and not even necessarily the new green, great reset types. Just the idea that this is how it's has to work is just not true. Asked Nicola Tesla. But at the end of the day, guys, these are people trying to keep you tapped

Starting point is 00:46:40 into the current status quo for their benefit. My opinion. Um, with controlling the choke points, getting out of the Middle East, hopefully if this works. Right. Right. clearly that'll work out. I mean, let me ask you this, guys. How do you think this works out? Let's just say Trump wins, whatever it looks like. Walk me through how that gets us out of the Middle East. I mean, really, let's not be stupid about this. Did we get out of Iraq? Did we get out of Syria? Did we get out of any? No, guys, do you really believe that going to war in Iran is going to get us out of the Middle East? What do you think will happen next? What about, what about Hezbollah? What about, I mean, you could, Israel will create what it needs to to justify what it's, doing. So too does the U.S. government. But even if you don't agree with that, give me the logic

Starting point is 00:47:26 point and how going to war with Iran gets us out of the Middle East, or rather gets the U.S. government out. It does not. Historically, logically, so listen to Glenn Beck, though, he'll wax intellectual about how great everything is right into the ground. He's completely redesigned the entire world. He has made a bigger impact than any other president maybe since Lincoln. I mean, guys, come on. Now, look, to be fair, though, this is clipped, obviously. obviously, right? He could watch the entire thing, which is included. If you really want to break it down, it doesn't really change his arguments. I mean, look, what could you possibly fill in to argue that he's better than Lincoln? I mean, guys, he's failing spectacularly. I mean, this is not my

Starting point is 00:48:08 opinion anymore. Conservatives, at least a huge portion, which I think is very clearly the majority, are just screaming about how this guy has failed them. But this guy will double down because that's what they do. I mean, what are you going to do? You've built your entire your world into this. You could take an Alex Jones route, but that's not working out well for him to suddenly go, now he's a globalist. It's like, well, that's what I was saying before. They're just, guys, it's just clear what's happening. Like the system, these are people that have built their world around the system, even though they pretend to fight it. And now as the system actually seems to be warping in some way, this is how they reacted. At least that's how I would

Starting point is 00:48:39 read that. Or you could do what we do and just honestly engage with this and reflect based on the information in front of you and not guess into the future based on what you want people to think you're thinking. You know, it's just honesty, principles, integrity. And I can be wrong. I'm not any more better or worse than anybody else out there. I just care. And I do what I can when I can't. Like all of you, the differences they are not like that. He becomes one of the most impactful presidents of all time if it works.

Starting point is 00:49:07 Okay. So the gamble is our entire world, all the things you care about. So walk me through what the downside is. What if he fails, Glenn? We could destroy everything so Trump could maybe end up, you know, What it really comes down to is Trump is risking, gambling all of it for his legacy. Now, you could argue that legacy might coincide with a better world for America. I doubt that, but let's just say that's the case.

Starting point is 00:49:32 Are you willing to make that gamble? Are you willing to gamble the direction of this country so Trump can have a legacy of saving us? That's just not American interest. It's not America first. That's America gains by a byproduct of Trump benefiting himself. If it ends up that way, which I doubt it will. that jury is still out. But if it works, he changes the entire course of the world. Everything that he has done is 100% America first.

Starting point is 00:50:00 You know, I mean, this is how stupid this is. You know, was that in the Epstein binder, too? Walk me through how funding Israel is America first. Walk me through how putting us to a war with Iran is America first. I mean, guys, every single thing they've done is not in American interests. That's why he's challenged and double-crossed all the Maha promises because Americans, wanted those things, not the people he actually works for. So they went the other direction. I mean, that's generally my opinion. But just, I mean, I don't, I shouldn't even need to go any further. Not a hundred percent. Not one thing he's done has been not America. I mean, that's just dumb. Nobody believes that. But blind followers will go along with it because it sounds nice. This is what I was hope. I'm hoping, hoping that I'm being tricked by Democrat media. Oh, thank God,

Starting point is 00:50:45 Glenn Beck. See, that's the truth because I want that to be the truth. That's the kind of person that falls for that. Nobody honest. The problem is nobody in the media will explain it. Nobody, everybody wants to look at everything he does as a one-off. And you know what? If I hadn't been traveling with it. You know what that means? Trust him.

Starting point is 00:51:04 That's what that means. Because it's not the one thing. It's the plan. It's how it all comes together. Cool. So Glenn Beck says trust the power. Trust the people in power. Is that ever been the right answer?

Starting point is 00:51:16 No, it's due. You can have hope for them, but you do not trust. you continue to be critical because even if they mean what they say, they could fail, they could be tricked, they could be manipulated. So you hold their feet to the fire. I mean, this is just basic logic, guys. These people aren't either that stupid or that dishonest. During the election, I don't know if I would have seen it as quickly as I did.

Starting point is 00:51:40 This guy has been thinking this through forever. Based on what? Did he write a book? Did he send you a letter? You're reading his mind? You see what I mean? Like where is this even coming from? Where do you feel like you're getting this insight into some long-term plan?

Starting point is 00:51:55 Again, you're just supposed to assume that Glenn Beck has the inside word and that he knows Trump and so they talk about it. Even that would mean that Trump told you that and why would we trust that he means it? The naivity here is insane, but really it's about getting you to feel that. Try to make him look like a bumbling idiot and they don't read. Sometimes he is, guys. And that's just clear. Sometimes he's not.

Starting point is 00:52:16 So sometimes the Democrat media lies about him. That happens too. Realize there is genius behind this. There is. Right. Don't you know, he can turn over a map or a place mat and draw the Middle East just like that, even though he can't remember the names of the countries when he's speaking about it.

Starting point is 00:52:32 Clearly, it all lines up. Real strategy. He tried to fix America's economy. What happened? The next guy comes in, destroys it all. Oh, Biden's fault. Simple, right? Even though you can clearly show that that wasn't the reality when he ended.

Starting point is 00:52:44 And you can clearly show that he's exponential. financially made this worse since coming into power. But yeah, Biden played his role, just like they all do. It's just a linear increase of all the problems. You know, and they fluctuates here and there, but it's pretty much always going up. It's just what we've been telling you our entire life doing this. He's trying to fix it. So by fixing the bigger problems, the structural problems that start overseas with the W.EF, all of our trade agreement. Right, right, right. So now Alex is calling him a globalist, by the way. So as Glenn Beck says, he's the globalist, he's fighting. But Alex Jones is going, he has a globalist. globalists. Now they're working together. Maybe you guys should talk and realize that now you're both contradicting each other. But you know, it's funny that at the end of the day, you're telling us he needs to go fight the WF. Why are we in a war with Iran for Israel? Walk me through that, Glenn.

Starting point is 00:53:28 Or in what discernible way is he even fighting the weft? He literally went to Davos both times. He literally has agreements with people there. He literally has the Gaza Freedom City being built in conjunction with people. He built the board of peace. He's got, I mean, guys just lazy. This is low information content, guys. agreements and tariffs and everything else. By fixing those, he believes I can fix the economy long term. And how did the tariffs go?

Starting point is 00:53:55 Oh, that's right. He got screwed. Oh, they're going to claim it was the Democrats that failed him. The end of the day, guys, Lutnik knew that was going to happen. That's why he benefited from it early. Or rather he did it early and they benefited after the fact when they pulled it back and ultimately all the refunds went back to the companies,

Starting point is 00:54:09 even though they raised their prices and you spent more. Swear to God, I feel like that was planned. Like ultimately it was some kind of inside agreement to dump money from us into the hands of corporations so they don't push back on things that he does that hurt their businesses. I don't know, just how that felt for me. But either way, walk me through how that was a benefit, how that changed the global dynamic. I mean, this guy is just going off buzzwords and talking points, guys. The real scary thing is maybe even believes this. If you can get there, we save the world, not just the nation. We save the world. Why do you think that people don't see the strategy?

Starting point is 00:54:43 You mean the strategy that no one's outlined, the strategy that no one's clearly pointing to, the strategy that doesn't even discernibly exist outside of Glenbeck saying it. Maybe they don't see it because it's not there. Duh, these people, why do you think you can't see the thing that's nowhere to be seen that no one's heard about? Go. Go ahead. Let me know how it's great. They've fallen into the trap.

Starting point is 00:55:03 The enemy is Donald Trump. Course, course, the Democrats. They made you think Trump's a bad guy. So that means that the thing he might, you did that we can't see is the good. good thing like the logic is i mean what does he even say the idea that we're just supposed to assume the plan that's not being pointed to is good because democrats lie about him where's the connection where's the logic the enemy is the pedophile government whatever the enemy is yeah the ones covering of the epstein files i mean that's what conservatives think guys what are you talking about she was the one

Starting point is 00:55:35 holding the epstein binder and if you make if you if you if you just say that's the enemy you can get all of these people who believe all these different things to stand together. And it's apparently good. But it's also possible, too, that that's what's going on. What's the suggestion that we should be ignoring the evidence of all the things of him pardoning people that are pedophiles of him, literally allowing a pedophile back to Israel that got caught trying to rape a child on Bromovich or any number of examples or happening in his first administration? Like, yes, Cas Patel can talk about arresting pedophiles in the streets all day long. whether that's even accurate. I talked about last time.

Starting point is 00:56:13 There's yet to be evidence to verify all the things he claims he's done. But in real world sense, you have the Epstein victims going, these people are protecting pedophiles. You walk me through how that's not relevant. That for those of us who actually believe in the country, believe, believe, have faith in the country. We're not talking about the country, Glenn. We're talking about the government.

Starting point is 00:56:37 See, that's what he does. We don't engage in the grievance. We engage instead on we hold these truths to be self-evident. Oh, my God. You're talking about the founding documentation of which the U.S. government right now is wiping their ass with. Literally, they're literally. I mean, Biden, Trump, I just can't even take this seriously.

Starting point is 00:56:57 And neither should you. It's not even worth the time I just took to go through this. But, you know, people fall for this stuff. This is what we need to fix and rebuild. Not what we're going to destroy, what we're going to rebuild. Wow. Well, let's hope, as I said. I certainly hope that's what's happening. Even if we hate these people, right, it doesn't matter if you, Biden, Trump, if you absolutely despise them, you should still hope that the good thing happens because it would argue, you mean,

Starting point is 00:57:25 the same thing we talked about during COVID is people, and it happened a lot, especially then, that there are people that were so desperately anti-Trump that they just didn't want the country to succeed. Or technically, I shouldn't say COVID, but the first administration that overlapped into COVID, is that they just, they would literally want the country to fail because they hated Trump so much. That just makes you a stupid person, makes you hypocrite. That means you only care about personal petty hatred. I can hate any of them, but still want them to do what they say they're going to do if I think that's best for the country. It just seems basic, guys, basic stuff.

Starting point is 00:57:56 Now, just an interesting kind of overview here. And just these are, this is probably 30% of the different times we've covered stuff like this. September, technocratic regime change. Under the guise of freedom, technocrats are slowly taking. control talking about just the new world order great reset like the idea of him reorganizing the way the world we talked about it a lot around the iran conversation a strait of her moose as well trump and the zionist globalist technocrats are building your new society whether you like it or not now see what he's leaving out of course is the zionist globalist technocrat part of it just the idea

Starting point is 00:58:28 that trump is doing that but you can prove that he's connected with all these people including the bill gates they want you to think is somehow not happy right now this one 2025 the network state coup and the engineered transition to what they literally do call tech Zionism. It's in their book. For an almost capital on the rapid transition to a techno-feudal state. There's Trump. Trump's new $2 billion WHO, as we literally talk about in this conversation about how he's building a new global order.

Starting point is 00:58:58 Trump goes to Davos. Globalism is dead. Long-lived globalism. I wonder how Glenn Beck missed all this. This one goes back to 2025. The fake globalist resistance ushering in the globalist plan. Look at that guy. January.

Starting point is 00:59:13 That was my opinion. I think we've been proven right. This is a report from Robert Inlakesh, how Trump and Israel are crafting a new world order. That was July, 26. This one was 2026 as well. January. Gaza's border piece seeks to reimagine the international order. Now, I just think it's all I'm pointing out, guys, is as we're going through all this with source material and ver and proving what we're saying, you got people like that that were yelling us down for Shet,

Starting point is 00:59:40 for saying we hate Trump and you're, you know, your anti, you know, he's America first. He's not about globalism. And now he's literally telling you that he's building a new world order. So how can he be fighting globalists if he's becoming a globalist? He already is. Now, Alex Jones is taking a different path of just admitting what he's been hiding the entire time because it's been clear the entire time.

Starting point is 00:59:59 But I don't take it, I don't feel it's honest. But isn't that just ridiculous? Now, lastly on this, here's Alex Jones in 2025, saying, ladies and gentlemen, I give you the face of the enemy. Now, think about where we are right now. What do you think the enemy is? Democrats still exist. So think about it.

Starting point is 01:00:16 Where are we right now? See, this is my point about the government. Just left and right. It's just, it's the government, guys. Now, they have different opinions, but at the end of the day, it's one agenda. And yes, the woke agenda, trans stuff, horrifying.

Starting point is 01:00:27 And I called it all out of the time. We broke it down. But here's the thing, guys. Was that the real focal point? It's something we obviously should care about for a thousand reasons. And it doesn't mean it just stops being important when other bigger things are happening.

Starting point is 01:00:38 But the point is what's really the bigger picture. Was their agenda to force you to call people pronouns? Or was that the sidestead? Was that the manipulation to get your foot in the door in other parts of the country or other parts of the world? To manipulate you speech, to justify censorship. So here, Alex Jones in 2025 February is saying, here's your enemy. The Calvin Kulose project says Wisconsin Democrat governor is supporting a proposed law that didn't ultimately happen that turns the word mother into inseminated personnel, which is insane. Like literally about the dumbest, it's insane. So as I said, obviously this is absurdly stupid and should be fought.

Starting point is 01:01:14 But if you think that that is what you're fighting right now and not rampant, technocratic globalism guided by radical Zionists, quite literally raping and murdering on TV, you've lost the plot in my opinion. February 2025, look at where we are. Okay, because it was clear. Now, those things matter to me. I called them out too. He was trying to distract or wasn't able to see the bigger picture.

Starting point is 01:01:37 And it was because Trump was the one building all of this, or at least part of it at this point. Right? And so look at where we're going now, beyond this. Like the idea of what these Zionists are building. And it's not just, anyway, that's important to think about. I realize that there are people like this will still mislead you when it matters, in my opinion. And again, I hope, I hope they're suddenly seeing it.

Starting point is 01:01:59 Now, talking about the technocratic surveillance and censorship, you know, flock and all that together, one quick, actually a few quick updates on this that I want to include. one is a good positive development. Who knows, I mean, here's the thing I'll say in conjunction with this, actually. These are positive things, but the problem is right now, and this is not new, but it's more rampant and clear than ever, the government doesn't care about the law. It very clearly does not care about your rights. It clearly will just ignore it when it wants to. So what's important to realize is that you'll have these rulings that say, oh, they can't do that.

Starting point is 01:02:31 Now it's a leak. Well, they'll do it anyway. It's still a good thing because now we can try to use the system to hold them accountable. But as a system that's increasingly being ignored, it's becoming more difficult, right? I mean, that's where it's being driven to something new. Problem reaction solution. They want us to go. The thing doesn't work.

Starting point is 01:02:46 So they present you with the new thing that they want you to accept. But this is still positive. But all I'm still want to highlight is that they'll still do it. We just need to haul that out and make more pressure the better. Scotus Wire reports a federal judge ruled that the, the tower dump warrants where essentially they just kind of scoop up everybody from any, any phone that was pinged on a tower or one of the cars they use, which allow police to obtain records for every cell phone that connected to a nearby cell tower, which is obviously unconstitutional around any given crime scene or any other thing

Starting point is 01:03:17 they use it for, are per se unconstitutional, meaning simply just specifically under the Fourth Amendment as General Warns. Good. That's great news. That is a good thing. I don't think I had anything on this. Why is that not going back? It's weird. See that? Oh, there goes. I just zoom in to do that. That was weird. Anyway, that's a positive thing. But don't forget. On top of that, don't forget, this was one of the stories of Israel's Pallantier rival is selling $1 million spy bans to U.S. cops. And it's an Israel company, Israeli company, and tech. And the point was they were using them as like stingray devices.

Starting point is 01:03:56 So they would just simply come out and park there, and they would, all your phones would connect to it and it would get all of your information. Text messages, it's insanely illegal and unconstitutional. And they don't, just keep telling us how they only use it for criminals. Like, this has been abused and they use it. They use it on protesters. It's everywhere, guys. So the fact that they ruled that was unconstitutional matters.

Starting point is 01:04:16 So called them out for it. But look, we have ICE agents out there covering their faces, not presenting warrants, spraying people. I mean, I'm going to go through some examples right now. But realize that it still matters. Your rights still matter. Whether they respect them or not. Because these things you understand are beyond the government, guys. These are inherent unalienable rights, God-given rights, which means they exist, whether or

Starting point is 01:04:40 they wrote them down in the Constitution. That's the whole point. That's why they wrote it that way. Their inherent rights. So whether or not they respect them now, it doesn't mean they disappear. They're there regardless. They're just choosing to not respect them. So we need to use this to push back. If you want to, I think it matters. If we're forced to live in a state of society, I think it does. Jesus freaking Congress had two things I want to share, two clips of ice. Now again, I've gone through some of the horror stories, right? Like a lot of these of the U.S. citizens getting beat up and detained and arrested for multiple days, no charge. Reitz was one of the most obvious veteran. I want to highlight continually is this, is this just rampant lawlessness, but like lazy, like spraying somebody with Mace for no reason,

Starting point is 01:05:22 just showing you that not only are they willing to break the law, violate your rights, but they clearly do not think that it will ever be held accountable. Even though it's on video, even though everybody can see it. And you know what? They seem to be right. Trump's administration, at the very least, literally does not care whether they will break the law, violate American rights. that's tell me glend beck how that's america first will you and i'm talking about green card holders even though they have just the same constitutional rights as you glen even though might me who know i don't know if he's ever claimed otherwise but most of them are too stupid to realize that that's the case or they lied to you about it anyway but regardless the point is that people have

Starting point is 01:05:56 rights and that should matter and if they're violated by the u.s authority that's not america first that's you know i guess technically that wouldn't you i mean i think in reality with what we're dealing with it seems to be israel first based on the fact that they're doing a lot of this training the IDF and the, or rather the ICE and police across the country to some degree. But anyway, I digress. The point in this clip is that you have a person here just harassing American citizens. Ice agent pulls a gun and a taser on an unarmed U.S. citizens simply for recording them. Now, of course, the people that want to criticize, and you can feel right.

Starting point is 01:06:29 I mean, look, you could argue they're being abrasive, but you have to understand what they're doing is legal and absolutely within their rights. two things they hate it because one they're being told to stop and they don't no police officer likes people that don't they don't just blindly follow their orders but then on top of that because they're breaking the law guys and they know that and not just covering their faces there i mean we've gone through an endless string of you know whether they're robbing people with stealing their cars do i mean any number of things are violating their rights arresting people without charge they get it on film and they can lose their job at least in a in it from if a court does something about it today, it seems. So I want to highlight this as a U.S. citizen who is simply filming them,

Starting point is 01:07:09 whether or not you think they're being abrasive. And also, by the way, following them. If you want to follow along on a public street, you're allowed to do that. It's been ruled. It's clearly the reality, but they hate it for the reasons I stated or whatever else. So here, if you, you know, this is an American citizen being treated this way. Now you have to ask yourself, what do you care about? Do you care that they just get what they deserve because they're a Democrat or you assume that? Or do you recognize that as an American, no matter what you think they're doing that irritates the cop, they have a right to do it. And so if they point their gun at them, if they try to create a context situation where they treat them as the

Starting point is 01:07:45 criminal, are you okay with that? And if the answer is yes, then you're a hypocrite. And on top of that, let's not forget that ICE agents are using flock cameras to spy on Americans. So if you're against flock cameras and unconstitutional surveillance, then you should be against ICE using it. Seems like it matters. Hey, he's not doing anything. I believe there's, there's, There's cussing. So earmuffs for those with the children watching today. As there are families that choose to watch the show together. I think that's great as opposed to the ridiculous corporate media.

Starting point is 01:08:15 Anything legal back up. What's going on, buddy? How you doing? He says, I'm not doing anything illegal. Back up. And he's not. And they know that. He even mentioned, I know this one.

Starting point is 01:08:24 So they're observing. That's what they do. I mean, this used to be, guys, let's not forget. As the Free Thought Project and Jason Bassler with police to police. And this is what a lot of those cop watchers do. And this has been going on for decades, guys. I mean, they've literally since there been cameras. You have people that are watching cops and some of their jobs are just to follow along and just film when they're working.

Starting point is 01:08:43 That's been there forever. That's why there's so many Supreme Court rulings that say they have a right to do it. So it doesn't change because Trump's angry at immigrants or whatever you want to argue or the fact that they are ICE agents instead. Hey, he's not doing anything legal back up. How are you going on, buddy? How are you doing today? Oh, I know this one. Let me just look at the casual nature. Do you realize that in some police departments, or at least as I was told it used to be,

Starting point is 01:09:10 every time a gun is pulled, they're supposed to be a report. Do you think they're doing that? So literally, they have a gun pulled and a taser pulled because you've got kids filming, literally. Yeah, like 20-somethings. Or I should say kids, but, you know, younger people with filming, they're allowed to film. And they know that. They're just trying to threaten them. Sorry, hit the wrong button.

Starting point is 01:09:29 Just so you know, you're being recorded, all right? We never do anything illegal. Stop following us. It's totally legal to follow you. It's totally legal. It is. All right. And so he just keeps threatening him.

Starting point is 01:09:40 He said you won't be arrested, sir. He said you won't be arrested, but you won't like the outcome. Stop falling to follow you. It's totally legal. We can observe law enforcement. You will be arrested, sir. It's totally legal. You have a good thing.

Starting point is 01:09:57 No. Trust me. You're not going to like the outcome. They're going to block. I mean, what else do you take that as? He's threatening them. No, you may find them. a minor thing. It is in comparison to some of the more egregious things they've done.

Starting point is 01:10:10 But it just shows you just this lazy violation. They don't care. These are, these are secret police. They don't need warrants. They don't need to identity. That one doesn't have a mask on for the first time and however long, but they don't care. Pulling their guns out, threatening American citizens for doing what's within their rights. You in here. They're going to block you in. Now this is a very common tactic that the courts have called out more than once, where they're sort of like cattling with the protest, they block them on a purpose. The car stops in front, he pulls up behind them.

Starting point is 01:10:39 Now people have been shot for this, for them creating a choke point, or having them jump out and stand in front of the car. And then a moment they try to back up, the car moves, they act like they're being threatened with the car and they open fire. That's happened more than once. People have been murdered in the street

Starting point is 01:10:53 because they claim they were being hit with a car and the court rules, it didn't happen. And guess what? Nobody gets held accountable. You're moving. Guys, why are you blocking the road? You're in front of us. So you can clearly see the car. Why are you blocking the road?

Starting point is 01:11:33 So he's just playing along. He's just playing around. Thanks for wasting tax dollars to harass a couple of people doing things within their rights. That's what he did. Now, tell me that this couldn't just as easily have spun out into some kind of a violent act if they just simply didn't, you know, hit the gas an accident or tried to move out of the way and they thought they were trying to hit their car. You know it could have. But that's why that ends up being created to put them in the position where they're the ones violating so they can act however they want.

Starting point is 01:12:02 Even though they're not violent, they've created it, right? Guys, why are you blocking the road? You're in front of us. We can't move. You're in front of us. Jesus, guys. You guys are crazy, man. And for all we know, that's just for their cameras. so they can argue later in court that they did something if something happens. I mean, you have to understand, these guys are being trained how to do that.

Starting point is 01:12:27 Of course, they're not trained on how to care about your rights, but they're sure as well trained how to cover their butts. So here's another example. Same thing. Now, this one specifically where they go up to a guy who's just working who does, is legally in this country. And ultimately, they just harass him. And at the end, just simply go, you know, the reality of it is they're going up and asking

Starting point is 01:12:48 without knowing who he is. And this is, we know what they're doing. And to get smaller in the context of, you know, breaking somebody's arm or shooting somebody in the arm, the end of the day, this is a violation of their rights. And they do not care about the guidance of constitutional rights, the U.S. law. He walks up and just forces this guy to try to give him his ID. And watch how it ends. Nothing crazy. Just ends up going, yeah, we didn't need him anyway. It's not the guy anyway. And just pressures him. I mean, again, had this guy bump. him the wrong way. Had this guy done, you know, done something with his tool that hit him, and you know where this goes. And all they're doing is just trying to fish. Your rights don't matter

Starting point is 01:13:28 to them. On the pole, it wasn't, man. Okay, I told you he put down the pool. I'm giving you in order to put down the page. Even that guy, in order to put down the pole, I'm working here. What do you want from me? Are you accusing me of a crime? And I've realized the only thing they can do is engage with immigration. They always try to play this game where, oh, your blinker or your car thing. That's not there. They're not allowed legally do that, but they do anyway.

Starting point is 01:13:54 Try to just get you to give you their ID. But that guy alone, like, your rights matter, guys. And if you were working on a work site, they just randomly come up to you for no reason, you don't have to comply unless they have a justifiable reason. Hey, man, I'm not talking about you. I'm working. I'm working, bro.

Starting point is 01:14:14 Hey, I'm working. Can you get out of here? from you want to get out of here for somebody i don't care i'm looking for somebody so right there guys they're just fishing that's not legal but these guys don't care as he covers his face doesn't identify himself and has no warrant and in general context they do not and they're consistently doing that as even people have called out they still don't care we're asking for you to identify yourself do you have an identification on you i don't you don't you don't sure what's your name you need my name yes sir i'm a legal citizen sir you're a legal citizen yes sir where were you born that's all i need to

Starting point is 01:14:45 tell you. Where are you born? Sir, can you please help? Let me work. I'm sitting so. Where were you born? Okay, let me go around you. Hey, where were you born? I was born here, bro. Let me work. Where at? Let me work. We're at. Guys, nobody who believes in what we would call American values, whether or not that's what the government believes in or not, would say that this aligns with what they think this country represents. You could just as easily frame this with, you know, any, the different color person with a different

Starting point is 01:15:11 uniform in any of the countries they call bad guys and Americans with loser, minds. Oh, despotic hellhole and they're, you know, but here it's okay because bad guy immigrant, even though the guy's not an immigrant or rather illegally in this country. It's just this is like, I mean, look, it's already happened to Americans more than once, by the way. But this is just like teetering on the edge of just becoming literally anybody who pushes back against them. Where are you born? I'm doing some real work here, buddy. Awesome, man. Where are you born? We're looking for somebody. Okay. We'll go look for them. Go look for them and don't bother me. Don't talk to me.

Starting point is 01:15:47 Okay, you can record all you want. Where are you from? You're from the United States? You're from here. You're speeding through here, bro. That's not us. Where are you born? United States?

Starting point is 01:16:00 Oh, hey, easy. You're walking into me. I'm walking next to you. Now he bought me, walks into him. I mean, he's the ones that excuse me, so clearly he walked into him. I mean, they're just trying to gin up some kind of controversy. Get off me, dog.

Starting point is 01:16:14 Where were you born? Holy smokes. Huh? What's your name? You were born in the United States or now? What's your name? I'm asking you the question. Let's go for you. Okay, that's funny how he asks a badge number and you finally just bounced.

Starting point is 01:16:27 He's not our guy anyway. Unmarked door, no names, no faces. He's not our guy anyway. So did he know that when he started? None of it matters because he broke the law and everything he did. And very clearly did not care about that man's rights. I mean, this has to matter to people that actually know what this is fault. I mean, if you care about anything Trump was even promising, that has to matter to you.

Starting point is 01:16:53 Now, Aaron Melnick points out, and that, well, Andrea Costello first, Core Civic has sold two more detention centers to DHS in Minnesota and Kansas. Detention centers. Yeah, only immigrants, right? Who knows where this goes? I thought it was interesting to overlap this as a hypothetical. ISIS now spent over $2.2 billion in purchasing four private prisons from CoreCiv at a profit. at a profit to the company of over half a billion dollars.

Starting point is 01:17:22 Of course, ICE will not actually operate these facilities. Core Civic keeps the contracts to run these places for the foreseeable future. Now, I actually forgot I wanted to follow up in what Core Civic might have been connected to. But either way, the point is you're building this and it's a private prisons run just for ICE. Seems, you know, I mean, right now they're faceless and unaccountable. Now you've outsourced a private-run prison system for the unaccountable faceless enforcement arm. Sure sounds like that's working in the direction for freedom. doesn't it? Now, Patriotic Blonde says Trump now says journalists who leak information he deems

Starting point is 01:17:53 incorrect will face long prison sentences. Welcome to 1984. Now, realize it was a leak about something that's true, which is that they're completely diminished on their munitions. And he just hated that people talked about that. And of course, maybe there's some secret thing we don't know about, but he comes out and goes, you'll be, you know, faced long sentences for leaking, but realize that in many cases leaking things is not a crime, especially when it's leaking something that is a crime. But that doesn't matter. You'll go to prison if I don't like what you're doing. Seems relevant, doesn't it?

Starting point is 01:18:24 Now, interestingly, let's overlap this with the story that was, you know, an old story, but we've talked about a long time ago around the, you know, during COVID-19, the CDC planned quarantine camps nationwide. So let me ask you something. What's the real material difference between that and what ISIS is doing? The narrative. That's it. The justification, the stated purpose.

Starting point is 01:18:48 So maybe, you know, who knows where it goes? Or those buildings are used next time when Democrats come into power and they want to use these again or whatever. The point is the government, guys, left, right, same damn thing. And realizing that all we're seeing is the building out of yet another thing just like this. So if you cared about this, you should care about that. Because it's simply just a utility that could be used however they say fit, whatever the next agenda is.

Starting point is 01:19:10 You know, maybe we become people that start to fight back against some kind of Israel take over the country and suddenly they didn't, you know, however you want to frame this. Now overlapping this with the flock direction, which will be, as somebody recently pointed out, and actually many people, Jason Bassler as well, the idea being that, well, hold on, you know, we're having flock cameras put everywhere and we're pushing back against this. And those that supporters are saying, well, you know, criminals and so on. Well, then it's not, it's not that far of a logical jump to, you know, another pandemic or the illusion of one. And suddenly there's lockdowns.

Starting point is 01:19:42 And suddenly the flock cameras are used to say that you're out where you're not supposed to be. And simply I saw a cartoon somebody made where it says, don't worry, they're just for criminals. And the bottom one says, well, during COVID, they called you a criminal if you got too close to somebody. And they're looking at each other. I mean, how do you ignore that? They said you were breaking the law. So suddenly, you're now being called a criminal with a flock camera because you're doing something that is your right. It's not that hard to see, guys.

Starting point is 01:20:09 So Orwell Day pointed this out and said this video today, he said, I found out that the person behind this pro flock which is just ridiculous. The free press. Barry Weiss. Surprise, surprise, right? It's almost like there's an interconnected point here. You don't feel like this watch. That's the panic behind a new fear. Do you ever feel like this watch? That's the panic behind a new fear sweeping across America. People are freaked out about surveillance from our employers, our nanny cams, and our phones watching our every move. And right now, this anxiety is being taken out of electric saws in cans of spray paint on tools used by law enforcement to keep us all safe. The target flocked safety cameras. In upstate New York, someone cut down to

Starting point is 01:20:50 flock safety camera with an electric saw. In Oakland, California, another was covered in kink. Yeah, yeah, that's two of the hundred thousand that you might actually talk about. It's funny how they're almost downplaying the fact that's happening so much. But anyway, that's not the point. And in Idaho, someone rammed one with their truck. In good old Florida, a man just sits in his lawn chair with a cardboard held up for the lens. That's about 0.01% of the ones that have been taken down. Since January, roughly 23 cities have handled their contracts were shut off their flock camera over a fourth amendment. Here, here.

Starting point is 01:21:19 There's even an open source intelligence website, Deflock, that's finding these cameras so people know exactly where to vandalize them. There's what's actually under attack. In 2025 alone, the system helped only 10,000 missing ways. Nope, nope, that comes from Flock who makes that claim. And then in real world examples, you just simply can't duplicate those numbers. How funny is that? Anyway, you see where this goes.

Starting point is 01:21:40 Good, good, good, good. You're all scared conspiracy theorist. Well, funny how that works out. Well, again, it guess it matters where the propaganda comes from. And you'll even like that even Twitter comes out and says, well, flock cameras scan and log every passing vehicle, not just suspected criminals storing plate monies. As you know, because their entire thing is, but flock safety cameras aren't interested in you. Like, it's just lazy, guys.

Starting point is 01:22:03 And it's not, it's their own information proves that that's a lie. But Israel propaganda will convince you flock cameras are okay. Maybe reflect on that for a second. Now, interestingly, as I pointed out when I did this show, Israel's infiltration of Flock and AI surveillance, I pointed this guy out. I just, on the back of, I just saw this yesterday. Zoe Brown says, Flock surveillance government guy, half decade working for APEC, which, yeah, it matters. I mean, it's just more connection. This is a guy currently working for Flock as a senior director of public affairs and worked for full time for APAC until 2022.

Starting point is 01:22:42 That's very important. I just simply said, well, meet. This is Shlomi Lior, algorithm and systems engineer for Flock. And he spent seven years in the Israeli military intelligence before ending up with Flock. As I showed you on that show back on June 2026. But here, as you can see, oh, it's got it right here, actually. Here's his account, Flock safety. He is the algorithm systems engineer, which is very relevant.

Starting point is 01:23:10 algorithm AI side of it seems to be important but then if you go down to the very bottom of course you don't get to see it unless you scroll all the way down israeli military intelligence and by the way if you want to go through the entire show which i do or if you want to go through show where i go through that i go through plenty more than just that i go and this is the one we're going to signal trace and leonardo which is packed with israeli intelligence or a company called site s i tete in all capital, same thing. And how they're all connected through all this. It's important. And there's plenty more, especially even today. Now, as Ramis 1, 2, 3, 4 points out, and we talked about this already as well. Axon, and I think on that one we go into,

Starting point is 01:23:54 oh, maybe the next one. Actually, here, I'll grab this one too, in case you want to watch it. Funny enough, it's actually relevant to the ice point we just made as well on this show. Ice has gone full-blown secret police, very obvious, and the axon flock bait and switch. Now, like I've said since then, and you can go into it entirely low. I mean, even on the D-Flock website, you can see right now, flock still represents 84% of the entire market guys. Motorola solutions, vigilant solutions, which Trump also has stock in, 5%.

Starting point is 01:24:25 Genitech is 2%. So all the other 72 is 4%. And that includes Axon. So I still agree that a lot of counties and different places have been switching to axon, but at the moment, it is still in very much the majority of flock and doesn't seem to be changing anytime soon. So consider that. So as I pointed out in one of my recent shows,

Starting point is 01:24:45 I'm not going to try to grab it, but it simply said, look, the real SIAP is to try to get us to ignore all of this. Oh, I think I know the name. There it is. Which I really think is important because, you know, as we evolved and understanding and kind of watch what's happening, you know, I said flock axon, vigil solutions. The real SIAP is dividing us into allowing any of them,

Starting point is 01:25:08 making us blink just long enough for this to happen. Or be fleshed out in time. entirely anyway. Clued those for you. I'll be at the bottom. Now, in that show, this one here where we go over the axon, um, bait and switch point,

Starting point is 01:25:25 we go over the connection to car to flock, but also to carbine for a previously carbine 9-1-1. I hadn't seen this actually. Now, there's a lot of this kind of stuff out there, but I just thought this one was important for a specific reason. One of which was that map you're looking at right there, which is not crazy, but the connection, but I'll make it a second.

Starting point is 01:25:40 But thank you, Ramis for sharing this. This is as they write, this is from Axon, The evolution of 911, Axon to Carbon. And remember that Axon is, you know, the same kind of technological connections is real especially, but in general of the flock and

Starting point is 01:25:56 surveillance dynamic, here's the clip. This is from their account. Then why this is relevant is for a couple reasons, and I'm going to read something from Whitney in a second after this, is because what we're highlighting here is not just about 911 calls. It's not just about surveillance or even like the network of like location data, right?

Starting point is 01:26:18 it's about the pre-crime element of what this creates and this invasive surveillance that through our own 911 call center like infrastructure, not even just that you're calling 911. And that's an Israeli company tied directly to Israeli intelligence. That's insane. And it has been since I've been, for years of I've pointed that out. But now it's completely dovetailed with the flock infrastructure. It's not a coincidence, guys. This is building out different parts of the system, of the control grid that Catherine has been telling you is coming.

Starting point is 01:26:48 If not already here. Oh, it's down here. Sorry. It's this one. Every year, more than 240 million people call 911 in the United States. Moments when every second feels like forever. But the longest moment is the one waiting for help. Well, I don't understand why, seeing as how, go ahead and do your due diligence on the odds, the statistics, the percentage of the time that the country. cops come and save you from the thing you called for.

Starting point is 01:27:24 You'll be surprised to find that it's like, I mean, realistically in the single digits, if not lower, because it doesn't happen. Because ultimately, cops, if in real time, stop something usually when it's happenstance, when it's coming across, the idea that you would call the cops when something's happening and they would show up and deal with it largely happens on like a kidnapping

Starting point is 01:27:42 situation or whatever. Like the idea that it's rare, guys. Now, it's not the same that there's not value. You know, I personally don't, I think it comes down to sort of an, anarchistic perspective, just simply defend, taking care of yourself and your family and those and your neighbors and taking you,

Starting point is 01:27:57 taking care of yourself. Because the truth is, it's an illusion to think that they're only going to come rescue from evil criminals. The truth is, the argument is that the idea of them existing would diminish the possibility of it. But really, it comes down to just your, you know, do you have a fence? Do you have protection?

Starting point is 01:28:15 Do you have a dog? Do you have anything? At the end of the day, I think that's important to think about is that this projection of you like needing 911 to help you. I just don't think that's the reality. I think that's the perception they frame it as, but the truth is quite different. Your car can drive itself.

Starting point is 01:28:32 Your watch can warn you before you're in danger. Your fridge can order milk. But when you call 911, a system built to send help still runs on decades old technology. Built for landlines, blind to video and too slow. See, what's funny is,

Starting point is 01:28:48 when was this made? Nine months ago? and that's not even that. They've been using carbine in this country for a long time. I mean, I've been talking about for five years. It's just funny that nine months ago made a video about how archaic system is in place, even though they're already using carbine. It's just always propaganda.

Starting point is 01:29:04 It's always selling you on this fear-based moment of, you better hurry and get the Israeli tech because we're all going to die when the criminals come or the Muslims take over or whatever, when what's actually happening is quite different. For a mobile world, this isn't just a miss. It's a mission-critical gap. and we're closing it. What's your emergency?

Starting point is 01:29:40 He went somewhere in that direction. For the first time, intelligence from the 911 call, from cameras, from sensors, from cell phones, all converge in real time. Oh,

Starting point is 01:29:55 okay, so it's not even about 911 call centers. It's about crime production. So wait a minute, so this turned into, you know, relaying calls into a massive control grid surveillance database.

Starting point is 01:30:06 almost like exactly what we've been worrying about for a very long time. Like well before, like with Carbine even, when Whitney and I talked about this a long time, when she wrote articles about it way before that. Literally, as I'll show you in a second. This is the pre-crime element that's building around you as we speak, as this AI dynamic builds in. Like look at what's happening in Gaza, guys.

Starting point is 01:30:25 They're using this to enforce. This is the same tech, the same people, the same agenda. Powered by AI at every turn, instantly understood and shared across the axon ecosystem. Chaos becomes clarity. Dispatchers, command, and first responders all see the same evolving picture instantly. Assuming it's accurate, though, right? But here's what's interesting, though.

Starting point is 01:30:54 So right, you got a push to switch to, you know, at least in rightly so, there was sort of a change to some degree, but to say, oh, it was going away from flock and it's going to axon. Well, maybe we just misread the situation. and realize that Axon was just picking up some of the market, and ultimately it's a bigger part of this outside of the flock cameras, right? Like Axon, the overlap with the drone dynamic and the surveillance and the mix with carbine and the obvious database system

Starting point is 01:31:21 that they're building around it, which flock requires, especially if we're going to be pushing back on flock itself, and that becomes a focal point. Like I said before, they don't need Flock's database. They just need the infrastructure. They have their own database. So a lot of this ends up being sort of, you know, headfakes to get us to jump at the wrong thing. That's why we just have to keep questioning everything and calling out what we see.

Starting point is 01:31:43 To bring help to those in need faster and keep those responding safer. Came in at 1115 and the RP says they saw a man with a gun around Main Street. It just happened where somebody that said they saw, I thought a kid had a gun. Then he'd get in a water bottle and they went out and shot him to death. That just happened. Yeah, that's how that works. Not to say that's every time all the time, but what happens with this is you end up leading in.

Starting point is 01:32:13 I mean, look, at the end of the day, it's not even about the one, it is what could go wrong, but it's about the violation of your rights. That's the point today. It's about this unconstitutional system rationalized by the idea that it might make you a little safer. Well, you know what I was saying for that. Those you might give up a little safety and a little, you know,

Starting point is 01:32:28 for a little safety for a little bit of, or excuse me, I'm mixing it up. Give up their rights for a little bit of safety. Deserve neither. Paraphrasing very quickly. Benjamin Franklin. The bottom line is that clearly you do not have, I mean, we don't even have the ability

Starting point is 01:32:42 to give up your inherent rights. That's what's stupid about that. You can allow someone not to respect them. It's an inherent thing that exists whether or not you care to point to it. What we're talking about here, again, the point. Command and first responders all see the same evolving picture instantly.

Starting point is 01:33:03 To bring help to those in need, to bring help to those in need. I just lost it. I'll keep it going. faster and keep those responding safer. Oh, I think that's what it was. Just simply look at what they're showing you. Drone enforcement cameras, real-time surveillance.

Starting point is 01:33:23 Like, I mean, that's just, this is exactly what people are worried about. The real question is, are people willing to accept this for the illusion of safety? Because realistically, it's going to amount to the same point, guys, and there's only going to bring more, more danger to your life in its own way from the enforcement arm, lack of rights or, you know, at the end of the day, you give me my own safety, like, or rather, you know, give me a place where I have to take care of myself with freedom, I'll take the danger. But not everyone's like that. Truly, there's a lot of people that want to be controlled, that want to be told what to do. I just don't, I personally don't think that's the majority,

Starting point is 01:33:58 but who knows? The call came in at 1115 and the RP says they saw a man with a gun around Main Street. And when it's over, every word, every video, every transcript is already preserved in acts on evidence, flagged by AI. Yeah, after they've absorbed your biometrics and translated that back to everybody, including Israel. Ready for review. Closing the loop from call to courtroom.

Starting point is 01:34:37 And of course, in many cases, using your personal information, your social media, your biometrics, and your inner circles to be able to broaden this out into any group. You know, look at what the Trump administration is. doing and what Biden would do to Democrat or to MAGA in the same way. The idea being that like Cash Patel, well, you're here and you had this community group on Facebook and therefore we see you as an organized cell and so you guys protest becomes terrorism. I mean, this is how this stuff is utilized. Yeah, and sure, it might stop the mugger over here if they happen to be on point, but that's irrelevant

Starting point is 01:35:05 to what this actually amounts to. The 911 call of tomorrow. That's coming, guys, whether it's the drones or whatever else. else take out the personal element. This gets even more insane. I'm just start a response. It will shape it at every moment from call to closure. We're saving seconds. And saving seconds saves lives. I'm not sure if someone's asking if it's an ad on TV. I mean, you can see the video right here. It's from the YouTube channel I was just pointing to. The evolution of 911,

Starting point is 01:35:53 axon and carbine right there. So what, oh, we can open the comparison here is interesting. And again, this is not huge because what you're really seeing here in this picture is, you know, the infrastructure, the, the electric, you know, infrastructure is the right word for it. So what's, but I just find it interesting to think about what they're highlighting right here, right? Right. Which is Carbine 9111.1 call center. And then here is the plot camera or just the license plate reader, AI surveillance, biometric absorbing system. find it to be very, very interestingly the same. So, I mean, it's not that profound.

Starting point is 01:36:33 I mean, they are the same, right? But in case you haven't put that together, that's very clear right there, you know? That just stands out and realize that we're talking about a lot of rural areas. There's a lot of places here that are not central coastal. Look at how many cameras in some of these sort of rural type areas. Not, you know, like middle of nowhere, but anyway, I just find it to be very relevant. Now, as Whitney Webb points out, I've read this before in August 2025.

Starting point is 01:36:57 She says, I've warned about. about pre-crime, the pre-crime push to stop mass shootings before they happen, right now being applied to immigration or whatever the new thing would be to push it. And she says, for years, especially from the first Trump administration. She says, I don't think it's a coincidence that this happens just as the full extent of the Epstein-Teill-Carbine relationship is revealed. Peter Thiel, Jeffrey Epstein. That's what's being used right now across this country.

Starting point is 01:37:24 She says, I wrote about Epstein-Teil and Carbine as well as Trump's previous pre-crime push chapter of spat in 2019 mass shootings, which then, William Barr, who launched DOJ pre-crime program called Deep, seemed to predict it an odd speech. Together in the same article, I'll point you in a second. She says, check it up below and don't fall for the latest tragedy being used

Starting point is 01:37:43 to coerce you into signing away your remaining freedoms. That applies to an immigration argument, Trenda, Ragua, whatever may be, guys. Even if they're, even if they are exactly what they say they are, the answer is never sign away your rights. Never. Now, here's an article from Times of Israel. U.S. public safety firm buys Israel's AI emergency response startup carbine for $625 million.

Starting point is 01:38:10 That's Exxon, which you already know. Now, here is Whitney's article from 2019, as we've read before as well, how the CIA Mossad and the Epstein Network are exploiting mass shootings to create an overwhelming nightmare. Now, understand this and realize that since then, it's only gotten worse. new narratives, new aims, but this is what you're seeing today. This, what she's highlighting in 2019 is what is now all around this country. It was ubiquitously connected to the block cameras and Israel intelligence and now the NDAA and all this stuff that's happening, right? So keep that in mind.

Starting point is 01:38:45 As she writes, following the arrest and subsequent death in prison, if you believe that's what happened, of alleged child sex trafficker, Jeffrey Epstein, a little-known Israeli tech company at the time anyway, began to receive increased publicity. But for all the wrong reasons, not long after Epstein's arrest and his relationships and finances came under scrutiny, it was revealed that the Israeli company, Carbine 9-1-1-now-just-carbine, has received, had received substantial funding from Jeffrey Epstein, as well as Epstein's close associate, former Prime Minister of Israel, Ihu Barack, and Silicon Valley Venture Capitalist Peter Thiel. So literally this got started with Peter Thiel technocrat, Prime Minister of Israel's government, Zionist government, and Jeffrey Epstein. And yet here it is, a foundational element of our control grid. I just sure wish people could hear all this stuff. You know, Carbine 911, or simply Carbine today, develops all handling and identification

Starting point is 01:39:40 capabilities for emergency response services in countries all around the world, not just the United States, but definitely including the United States, where it has already been implemented in several U.S. counties and partner with major U.S. tech companies like Google. Way more since then. This is 2019. It specifically markets its product as a way of mitigating mass shootings in the United States without having to change existing U.S. gun laws. That's weird, right?

Starting point is 01:40:06 Yet Carbine is no ordinary tech company, as it is deeply connected to the elite Israeli military intelligence division Unit 8200, whose alumni often go on to create tech companies, as we've covered many times, as was written by Calcitrant or what's the name of that platform. It's been, and that's stating directly from Israeli elements in the government that are just outlining, out, completely stating that the entire pipeline is about intelligence to creating companies and then running them out forward to continue the intelligence agenda. It's like very public. In fact, let me finish this and I'll play that clip again. So, who often go on to create tech companies, Carbine among them, that frequently maintain their ties to Israeli intelligence. and according to Israeli media reports and former employees often blur the line between the service to Israeli's defense, intelligence apparatus, and their commercial activity.

Starting point is 01:41:02 In fact, she's played now. Since perfect for that point right there, as I know you guys have seen it for those that have it. They buy it from, or I think they were buying it from. We have an incredible array of possibilities of creating foreign companies that have no way being traced back to Israel, shell companies, over shell companies who affect the supply chain to our favor. We create a pretend world. We are a global production company. We write the screenplay.

Starting point is 01:41:32 We're the directors. We're the producers. We're the main actors. The world is our stage. Did you see any surprises in Gaza? Surprises? Yeah. Like the intelligence surprises.

Starting point is 01:41:41 Pages, walkie, talk, do you know how many equipment, I mean, treated equipment do we have in these countries? You can't, you know, I do. You mean, you mean booby-trapped equipment? not only will be trapped and spying. Manipulated equipment. All right. In which countries you're talking about?

Starting point is 01:41:57 All the countries that you can imagine. It's just always so relevant. I've played it many times. You know, just publicly stating, even if it's a lie, that they manipulate companies and manipulate technology. I just, you know, and it's all right there.

Starting point is 01:42:12 You know, but finally, Candace played it on our show, and so people actually know more about it. But, you know, it's the same as anything else. It's like it takes one of those elements for this to actually reach the kind of people that have the ability to, you know, wherewithal and resources and positions to do, you know, just that's the whole point, though.

Starting point is 01:42:27 There, you know, what's funny is there's plenty of positions of potential influence and power who aren't necessarily dishonest or not necessarily, you know, somebody who might be willing to take action should they recognize the problem or see what we see and they just don't. Like, that's why plenty of doctors just kind of woke up to what happened during COVID. I'm not talking about the ones that are keep playing us, but the ones that really just woke up to it. And we're like, now I see it. I can't believe I never saw that. Now, why didn't they see it before? All the evidence was there. All the information that we point to was already there. They just didn't see it. That's what sometimes just happens, right? And so

Starting point is 01:43:04 that's important to think about. Now, continuing on this with the companies, it says, as this report will reveal, Carbine is but one of several Israeli tech companies marketing themselves as a technological solution to mass shootings that has direct ties to Israeli intelligence agencies. Now, the focal points changed, right? The mass shootings point isn't the focus right now, but it's the same idea. What is it about immigrants? That's us. We can do that the best. You know, what was it about, you know, whatever the current justification is, those companies step in to fill the rule. It's like COVID. The narrative is one thing. It's about, you know, it's the rather, like, for example, if it's digital IDs, well, it's a pathogen or it's immigration or it's, you know, whatever the current

Starting point is 01:43:47 thing, it justifies the agenda. It's just always how this works. In each case, these companies' products, are built in such a way that they can easily be used to illegally surveil the governments, institutions and civilians that use them. That's currently the reality of this system that's built all the way through this country, or literally every other part that they've worked their way into. And that's including the AI stuff and the current government itself. And it says that's a troubling fact, given that Unit 8200's documented prowess and surveillance as a means of obtaining blackmail.

Starting point is 01:44:18 There you go. And Israel's history of using tech companies to aggressively spy on the U.S. Like this, that's just the, I mean, Epstein was involved with building this network, guys. So you're watching, you just have this blackmail network running through this country. You wonder why our government can't do anything about it. This is further compounded by the fact that unit 8200 linked tech companies have previously received U.S. government contracts to place backdoors in the U.S.'s entire telecommunication system, as well as into popular products of major American tech companies, including Google, Microsoft,

Starting point is 01:44:48 Facebook, many of whose key managers and executives are now former Unit 822, hundred officers. I would argue Palantir is clearly central in this conversation. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has made it no secret to placing unit 8,200 members in top positions in multi-national tech companies, is a deliberate policy, his statement, meant to ensure Israel's role as the dominant global cyber power, while also combating nonviolent boycott movements targeting Israel's violations of international law and stifling United Nations criticism of Israeli government policy and military operations abroad. Of course, you point out the first part of it and you just hate Jews, is what you're told,

Starting point is 01:45:28 right? Not that you're clearly highlighting that he just said it's a deliberate policy to place intelligence entities in the middle of companies, but so that's what you get the people to circle around and just go, you hate Jewish people. Well, that's not what we're talking about. We're talking about intelligence of a foreign government, manipulating U.S. policy. But you see, now you guys see the game, right? for a long time, people would be scared, scared away by simply allegations of racism.

Starting point is 01:45:56 Now, talking to switch topics a bit, let's talk about Fauci and the contempt conversation. One thing I wanted to get into today because I want to make sure that we talk about what I think is theater here. And then no way should this be taken is defending Fauci. It's just not the reality. Now, what happened if you didn't see it? Went in front of Congress and he played the fifth like a hundred and something times. Now, that's his right. Everybody has Constitution rights, guys, everybody.

Starting point is 01:46:20 And so the bottom line is, as I just wrote here, what's happening with Fauci is political theater. The part to remember, though, I mean the government, that's how I see it. They chose to pardon him, chose to give him a presidential accommodation, chose to let the statute of limitations run out. All this could have happened years ago.

Starting point is 01:46:40 Could have happened before. I mean, this was obvious, and everyone was screaming about doing it before that timeframe. So ask yourself why this only got it a year after that. I mean, this just seems blindly obvious to me. Now, it says Fouch, I wrote Fouchy's a monster, but he has constitutional rights.

Starting point is 01:46:55 That's simply an actual fact, a statement of fact. Do your due diligence, this won't succeed by design. That's what I believe. If that is, if they follow their own laws, which I guess is always the caveat to a group that doesn't care about the law.

Starting point is 01:47:11 But my point is I don't think Fouchy is somebody they want to have, you know, at the end of the day, Fauci, I mean, if Fauci, gets held accountable, Trump is right there next to him. So is Biden. So I just don't think that's the case. I mean, plenty of them in this room or in this video in the Congress are absolutely just as culpable to most of what was involved.

Starting point is 01:47:30 So here's the Hill Senate committee votes to hold Fauci in contempt. Also, I don't if I said that. So they voted to hold him in contempt of Congress for pleading the fifth. So the point for me is whether or not this is actually going to matter. So first of all, let's just say they hold them accountable. for contempt of Congress. And I'll go into what this means. That's, it's, I mean,

Starting point is 01:47:52 ultimately, based on what the documentation I can find, it's largely a misdemeanor. So what we're talking about, and even if not, you know, like a year in jail, if not less, it ends up being a slap on the wrist for somebody like Fauci,

Starting point is 01:48:03 this is the real point, is that if ultimately ends up being, you know, you're guilty, but nothing happens, or it gets a slap on the wrist, some time served or whatever, that's not a win, guys, it's not a win.

Starting point is 01:48:14 At the very least, it's, if you think it's, I mean, if you take the win for his name, being tarnished like Tucker was just telling you, to me that means nothing in the real sense because he got away with murder. That's the point. So the Senate committee, chaired by Rand Paul, voted to refer Fauci to be held in contempt.

Starting point is 01:48:34 That goes to the DOJ is where he's sending it. Now, eight to five was the vote. Holding a witness in contempt, he writes, is a serious thing. And it should be rare. But the contempt power exists for precisely this circumstance. oversight is not a courtesy this committee extends or a favor a former official grants us it is a constitutional obligation interesting that he cites constitutional obligation when fouchy has the constitutional ability to say i plead the fifth because what they're trying to get from him

Starting point is 01:49:02 is information that will obviously be used against him and it should be i agree with that but then clearly if we're going to if we all you know this is what it comes down to it's like free speech if you do not defend the free speech of the people that you despise then you don't believe in free speech. Now, criminal referrals that come from committees usually go to the full Senate for a vote. But Paul, Grand Paul, can also send it to DOJ, which is what he's saying he's going to do. Indicated last week, he planned to move directly to the DOJ. Now, I wonder what that mean, is it because people in Congress, I mean, I see the thing is I don't think either way this goes, it'll ultimately amount to something. And I think that going to the DOJ will end up in the same

Starting point is 01:49:40 direction. I feel like this is meant to go nowhere. The referral is not a mandate. The DOJ will ultimately decide whether to take it up. So it may just languish there with nothing. They may just let it drift in the background by claiming we're going to get to, reviewing the file or whatever, and it just never gets picked up again. Lawmakers are split along party lines as to whether Fauci retains constitutional protections in this situation, given that he received a pardon. So I'll address this next, but guys, this is basic. Your rights are inherent. They don't disappear based on certain circumstances with an asterisk. That's not how that works. The real question comes down to the,

Starting point is 01:50:15 fact that if he was pardoned, right? This is what this really means, but people are misinterpreting it. If he was pardoned, well, then he has no reason to believe that what he says could be used against him. That will be the real case. And then what they're going to say is, well, he has no reason to believe he's going to go to jail. So why would he plead the fifth if the whole point of the fifth is that you're about self-incrimination? There's no reason to worry. But here's the thing. Rand Paul has been yelling about how he's going to be put to prison. So it's very obvious that he thinks that it might be used against him, even and around the things he's been pardoned for. And even if you argue it's just his interpretation, the end of the day, he has a right to

Starting point is 01:50:52 that if he feels he might incriminate himself. So it's going to be this game where they're trying to argue that ultimately his right doesn't apply. So doesn't that feel weirdly like trying to undermine constitutional rights like everything else we're dealing with, just on a side point or maybe the whole point? I don't know. It says, oh, where was this? Oh, yeah. And so, you know, the pardon covers any offense, which I think is stupid in the first place. The idea that you can just blanket pardon and areas, just the dumbest thing in the world. I don't, I said that then, I don't think it applies. So either way you look at it, guys, it's the same reality for claiming the fifth.

Starting point is 01:51:25 But it says a federal pardon does not eliminate individuals Fifth Amendment protection. We should have already known that if they still face a real and applicable risk of federal or state prosecution. Now, to be clear again, pardoned or not, your rights don't just disappear. What they're really getting into is whether that pardon removes the risk of potential going to prison. So therefore the Fifth Amendment specifically wouldn't apply. That's the point. You're going to find tons of people that don't understand that right now. Democratic members of the committee, including Peters and Senator Richard Blumenthal and Maggie Hassan brought up numerous motions to table the resolution, all of which were voted down by a Republican majority.

Starting point is 01:52:02 I thought that's worth pointing out seeing as how right now you keep getting all this narrative about you know, fighting a deep state or whatever or the they won't let us. The Republicans control everything and have the ability to do that. So every time you see something happen, ultimately realize that they are, you know, it's just you're being played often if you believe Republicans are somehow, you know, doing everything you want

Starting point is 01:52:21 and it's always the Democrats that are hurting you. It's a game, always. Fauci's attorneys argued in a letter last week that Paul stated aims of getting the former director, Fauci, imprisoned, clash with his claims, the doctor should speak freely without concern potential backlash.

Starting point is 01:52:36 That's just basic, guys. I mean, it's obvious the conversation is that Fauci's a criminal and going to jail. That's what this is all about. We want to find out what he did and hold him accountable. And it's obvious. Now, everybody in front of him, as he's pleading the fifth, we're like, you're going to be held accountable. So it's quite clear that he thinks, and it's clear that they want him to be held accountable. I mean, this is just basic stuff. In May, the senator called for Fauci to be indicted for what Paul claims was lying under oath about gain of function. He did. And he should be

Starting point is 01:53:01 indicted. They didn't do that, though, did they all the way back then? No, they waited until after everything had expired. Statute limitations. He got the pardon. He got the accommodation. Now they run it all through. I don't buy it. Saying Fauci did so in 2021. He did. He lied. Remember of the EPPP research and I didn't do gain of function?

Starting point is 01:53:19 He lied. Point blank. Right then or the following week, they should have held him accountable. Not pretending to now, you understand. Now, for those who don't believe what I was saying, here is directly from Cornell School of law or law school. Contempt of Congress. Contempt of Congress, similar to contempt of court, is when an individual intentionally disobeys or interferes with a congressional action. Congress has the power to restrain such individuals from

Starting point is 01:53:46 interfering with its actions. So in this context, if, for example, they said the same thing that you're required to come to Congress to answer these questions. And there was no, like, it was just somebody, like somebody else had nothing to do with any of it, but like new Fauci personally or whatever. That's a bad example. But basically had the legal responsibility to come, but truly had no real risk of going to jail. And they claimed the, if, well, that's where this would apply. Or just said, or rather in another context, just said, I'm not going to answer. I don't care about any of this.

Starting point is 01:54:18 I'm not required to. Well, that's where this would come into play. Arguing, well, legally you are required based on the, you know, like lying to Congress is because it did it a crime, right? And so in this case, what the point I said earlier is where it really comes down to is that he is at risk of that point. So that does clearly apply. And this is currently actions for which individuals can be held in contempt of Congress are

Starting point is 01:54:38 largely a matter of statutory law. and focus mostly on when individuals refuse to appear or give testimony for a congressional investigation or hearing. So the testimony would apply if the first part didn't apply. And it says, as to USC 192 states that any person who is summoned before Congress who willfully makes default or who having appeared refuses to answer any question pertinent to the question under inquiry shall be guilty of a misdemeanor. Misdemeanor. And may be subject to fine imprisonment if convicted. a misdemeanor, guys. So are you, let's just say this goes that way.

Starting point is 01:55:14 Is that going to be enough for you that Fauci gets a misdemeanor slap on the wrist, which I can guarantee will not amount of time in jail with what we're talking about? That'd be my opinion, but that's what I believe that. Nobody thinks that's okay, but you're going to get the Benny Johnson types that will yell about how it all worked out because that's what their job is. The matter under congressional investigation, however, must be a subject over which Congress has legislative power before an uncooperative witness may be convicted of contempt. That's interesting. The U.S. Supreme Court in Quinn v. United States, who I have up here as you can look

Starting point is 01:55:48 at as well, also recognize certain limitations on congressional power to investigate and summon individuals, namely that it, quote, cannot be used to inquire into private affairs unrelated to a valid legislative purpose. These are good just to remember for future, nor does it extend to an area in which Congress is forbidden to legislate. Similarly, the power to investigate, the power to investigate, must not be confused with any of the powers of law enforcement. Those powers are assigned under our Constitution to our executive and the judiciary. Still further limitations on the power to investigate are found in this specific individual guarantees of the Bill of Rights, such as the Fifth Amendment's privilege against self-incrimination,

Starting point is 01:56:29 which is in issue here. And here's the actual case. Says it right there. That's exactly the same statement. So all it's really saying is that in this exact case, ultimately your Fifth Amendment very much does apply. Now, like I said, what I were going back to is that with Fauci, the argument will be made or try to be made that he's under no risk of going to prison, so therefore that puts him in contempt.

Starting point is 01:56:52 But that, and even then, this is being relayed to the DOJ. So the question is, are they going to put all the time and effort into going after this knowing that it's, you know, any lawyer is going to look at this and go, it's not going to happen. just like with comie and all the rest of them i mean look i even argue with bolton like let's watch where it ultimately goes i'm willing to bet you that he really doesn't even serve time even though he should my point was all the rest of them they just kept pressing it and katia james they went out for like four times they failed every time because they didn't have a case they just wanted the wheels to look like they were turning that's what i think anyway here's another example this one's from recently

Starting point is 01:57:33 the Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination. Specifically, the Fifth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution provides that no person, quote, shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself. Now, Congress is different than being in a court, right? But at the same point, ultimately, the information can be used against you in the court. So you can claim the fifth thing, I'm not going to incriminate myself for the same purposes. The privilege against self-incrimination may arise in a criminal case or, quote, whenever there is a realistic possibility, that's the point, that the privilege's holders answer

Starting point is 01:58:07 to a question. Court, Congress, same point, can be used in any way to convict him of a crime. It has also been interpreted to protect the witness from compelled testimony that could be used against him in either federal or state criminal proceedings, which could very well apply here if some kind of a state court wants to go out for him for something else. In practice, the privilege, quote, protects against any disclosures that the witness reasonably believes, reasonably, which doesn't mean it's the truth, right? But they believe it based on Rand Paul's threats, for example, could be used, they reasonably believes it could be

Starting point is 01:58:41 used in a criminal prosecution or could lead to other evidence that might be used so. That's where it all lies. They'll absolutely argue, which in a way almost backwardly proves that he's guilty, which he is, that ultimately if I'm forced to testify, it'll lead to other evidence, which opens up new crimes that aren't pardoned under Biden's thing. Like that's, I mean, trust me, this will not work unless they just don't care about law, just throw them in jail and don't care anyway, which honestly, for this person, not that I hope the law is broken, but I hope this person ends up in jail regardless. But the point is, guys, we have to care about Constitutional Rights, about the process in general. Otherwise, it'll turn around and be used against you, which it already is,

Starting point is 01:59:22 which this is why I believe this is all theater. The privilege, quote, not only extends to answers that would in themselves support a conviction under the federal criminal statute, but likewise, embraces those which would furnish a link in the chain of evidence needed to prosecute the claimant for a federal crime. That last sentence is the real point. So they'll find a connection that links to something. It's in a legal sense, my point would be any lawyer will tell you that he's in the right, in the sense of not being in contempt for using that. But I want to reiterate, because I guarantee this will be used to somehow defending Fauci. This person is a monster and should be in prison. and had our government cared about actually holding him accountable,

Starting point is 02:00:03 he'd already be in prison. So would Trump and Biden, by the way. The reality, though, even though they are the government, the reality is that they let this go until it would be impossible to go after. I mean, it's the same as anything else. It's the same as, I mean, historically, I mean, here's a good example, Clapper. The NSA is not spying on anybody.

Starting point is 02:00:23 And they damn well knew he was lying. It got proven that he was lying. And then they waited until the statute of limitations ran out before they, ever really addressed it. That's how that works, guys. They know what they're doing. It's frustrating. But watch as people misrepresent that in the new media that has usually no idea what it's talking about. Okay, so talking about the MRI shot, by the way. So the condition is the same. So we're talking about Fauci being pardoned. Why? Because he, you know, it depends on who you're talking to. But it was because of the COVID-19 illusion, guys. They lied to us. They sold us things Trump and Biden included

Starting point is 02:00:57 that killed people. Now, they just approved another MRI shot, which we told you about, repeatedly, by the way, and got yelled down for by certain people in the two-party illusion. FDA approves Moderna's mRNA flu vaccine. It is quite frustrating, though,

Starting point is 02:01:15 that we could have been, you know, August 2025, Trump's universal MRI sleight of hand, long-plan universal vaccine, in which we point to as one possibility, the MRI 101, which is the new flu shot, the M-Fluxa, whatever it's called. Now, as far as they can tell, it's not universal,

Starting point is 02:01:30 but understanding that its MRNA opens that door for that being where they take it. See my point? But on top of that, we followed up again on June 19, 2026, Moderna's new MRA flu shot. Right there, June, 19th. So had you been watching this show, you were way ahead of the conversation on this point,

Starting point is 02:01:49 like so many others. Surprise, surprise, it's almost like this show is valuable to you. So here's New York Times. The FDA on Wednesday approved the first MRNA flu vaccine, which is what we all told you. I mean, I told that it, and this isn't about like Trump or Biden. I mean, it is essentially for Trump, but that this was the direction it was going to go in. Whether Trump was elected or Kamala, because this was the plan. And just if that shocks you, think about that for a second and realize that's why it shocks you

Starting point is 02:02:20 is because you thought he was different. And it's all the same, which is why we shouldn't go through the same cycle again, guys. take a different path. Approve the first MRI flu shot. Now, enabling the use of a technology they write that will make it easier to rapidly target a widely prevalent

Starting point is 02:02:37 or particularly virulent strain of the virus, meaning that just like the COVID-19 illusion, they can just jump around with the, you know, they'll put this shot out and then it'll be variants and changes and jumps around. It'll be the same thing. Not in every possible way. Different spite, but different protein, for example,

Starting point is 02:02:54 but what we're talking about is the same things that lead to the same problems, the same nanoparticle dynamic, right? The lipid nanoparticle structure, the same, specifically, the MRNA that doesn't leave your body or that cycles through for longer than it should, the production of the antibodies that continue, or the idea that you have multiple types that cause antipodydependent enhancement, or all the different things that we highlighted, the system caused. In fact, I hope this one comes up. Hmm.

Starting point is 02:03:29 It wasn't this one, I don't think. The point was the MRNA platform. Oh, that'll type in the MRNA. That'll do it. Oh, look at that. That's funny. RFK's universal flu vaccine platform. That's also relevant.

Starting point is 02:03:41 Same thing, actually. Same general conversation. This is where, and we predicted that's where RFK was going to take this, even with MRI. A lot of pushback to that too. But let's do the MRN platform because the peer-viewed study, found that the actual platform system was, there it is right there. Oh, no.

Starting point is 02:04:06 There it is. Grab both these, actually. So much good content to this platform. And I mean that. Like, there's just really a lot of good content that goes back a while. The MRNA platform is dangerous to do you, is dangerous dual-use technology. I agree with that right now, specifically the general sense of it. But the point was, that's weird, 86 and 6.8.

Starting point is 02:04:25 The point was this one, specifically talking about the study, found that the platform, right? Not the different antigen, different protein, but the platform itself was driving myocarditis. So if they keep it going and Moderna is using the same platform, then it'll cause the same problems. Which, by the way, guess what? One of the people in this study got paraccharitis. Out of what, 50,000 or something? I mean, that alone should be enough. But it's more than that.

Starting point is 02:04:50 We'll get to it in a second. The approval of the vaccine called M. Flusiva, which is manufactured by Moderna, follows a series of blows to MRI research directed by RFK Jr., including the cancer. of 22 projects meant to develop vaccines with MRNA. As we told you, that was a head fake. When it happened, because they didn't stop all of them. So they lied. They cut the big $500 million one, but guess what? They pumped it right into this direction, which ended up being MRN anyway.

Starting point is 02:05:19 And the rest of them, they kept going. That's why we include the self-amplifying point, which we've called out before, wherever that is, 2025, that they leaned into self-amplifying under the guise of ending MRI. That's what happened. And here we are even more clear with that today. So it says they canceled 22 projects meant to develop vaccines MRI through the government's Barda.

Starting point is 02:05:45 Initially, the FDA had refused to even review Moderna's application for approval earlier this year. Now, I can't tell if this is a change of personnel. I think it was Prasad. And like basically the point is either they pretended to not want it. So we stopped paying attention or somebody who didn't want it who was, people have left, right? People that was there before. I forget the couple that already left. Maybe they were the ones that really didn't want.

Starting point is 02:06:08 want it. They actually didn't want it. And they left because they found out the team actually was secretly going in MRNA anyway. Either way you look at it. They said, we don't want that. Refused to even review it. But then quickly reversed course after public outcry, whatever that means. So they pretend did not want it and then did it, or however you want to frame that. The company said it expected to have the vaccine ready for the 2026 respiratory virus season. Maduro's chief executive said this approval also reflects the ongoing potential of our MRI platform. to help address public health challenges through continued scientific innovation. Well, it's the same platform, the plug-and-play platform that we all talked about,

Starting point is 02:06:46 the same platform that they then removed from their website, the video that they had on YouTube, that YouTube itself censored somehow. I've gone through all this. And what does it show you? A horrifying thing that they tried to hide after the fact. Like the whole system that shows you how crazy this is. And the fact that I can prove to you based on their own timeframe that I still have archived, that they've removed, that shows you within a matter of days they already had the vaccine.

Starting point is 02:07:08 produced that ultimately was not isolated by the proving statement of the people that eventually claimed they did which even then you can prove they didn't you feel those at what he feels that went through this with me you know what i just said you know all the information before but either way the point is that this platform is the same problematic thing that moderna put out in the very beginning that hasn't really changed MRI technology instructs the body to produce a fragment of a virus that then sets off the body's immune response so they want you to think aside from all the stuff that you know which is that this absolutely continues to produce this in your body that has all kinds of terrible side effects.

Starting point is 02:07:41 This whole thing is not in your interest. And that's what's so crazy about it is that seems to be pretty broadly accepted now by most people. Even the Democrats who have quietly stopped taking the shots, even the so-called seventh booster that 20% of even healthcare decided to take, even though the system was saying you need it just like all the ones before. Hotez was pulling his hair out, going, you need to take the shot. Seven the shots important for the whole thing to come together. and even only 20% took it of the healthcare industry.

Starting point is 02:08:09 We've all been playing, guys. As a vaccine activist in 2021, it says, Kennedy, RFK Jr. had petitioned the FDA to pull MRNA vaccines off the market six months after the rollout. Of course, that's before he was in power and he leaned into him. Moderna has said that the faster new approach, the fact, great, if a faster new, faster forming killing shot, a new approach will enable a shift away from the current process of focusing on one flu strain for an entire hemisphere each season and allow each nation

Starting point is 02:08:41 to pick its best option. Cool. So now we've got vying different antibody producing shots, MRI platforms that are different. I mean, the whole thing causes, it seems more of the problem that we saw in the first time. The idea that you now have different platforms in, like think about Europe where you've got countries that are right next to each other. And now you have different shots. They'll be jumping around, taking different shots that produce different antibodies. it causes the same problem. It will allow us to rapidly adjust to rapidly emerging new flu strains.

Starting point is 02:09:09 And a capacity we have not had before, they say. Well, remember, on record, you have Fauci and plenty of others saying, well, if you make a shot and it gives you the wrong antibody, well, you have the bad response. So you're guessing. Now you've got multiple antibodies in different places. It's the whole reason the entire science, if you want to call it that behind this whole thing,

Starting point is 02:09:25 hasn't been functioning properly to begin with. It's all, I mean, this is where you get into the real understanding of the whole broken thing that this entire industry is. The company enrolled nearly 41,000 people, less than I thought. 41,000. That's a small, tiny thing for what it used to be. And it says 50 or 50 to 64. In a major study that found that the vaccine was effective, they said,

Starting point is 02:09:52 but had, get this, more side effects than the vaccine with other technology. So first of all, realize. that despite the claims of RFK Jr. about the gold standard, which I've already proven three different times that they didn't follow, which means they aren't using placebo's saline. They're using other vaccines,

Starting point is 02:10:13 and they just, even though he promised the world, like food dies, like, you know, go down the list. Everything else they promised. COVID shots, they're still doing. Here's another example. Another example where they used another vaccine to compare to this shot. And this one had more side effects,

Starting point is 02:10:28 which means it would have been way worse if they compared it to an actual saline, which is why they do that. In a major study that found the vaccine was effective, but had more side effects than a vaccine manufactured with older technology. In the study, about 21,000 people took the Moderna vaccine, and about the same number took the competitor vaccine. See, it's as if they try to pretend, we're just trying to, we know, this is what they do. We know this is safe technology, so we're not.

Starting point is 02:11:01 just going to compare it to the other safe one. Neither of them are. And it says within six months, 411 of the Moderna recipients got the flu. So just so you understand, even 411 of them got the thing that's supposed to help them not get, by the way, which is insane to me. Because I don't know, who are you talking about getting sick randomly in the environment or are you getting sick from the shot? They'll never want to tell you that that's what's happening, but that does happen. And it says compared to 557 of those who took the other flu shot. Who also got the flu, by the way? That translates to a relative efficacy of about 27%.

Starting point is 02:11:37 Are we still doing this? Guys, are we literally? Yes. Do we really have to play the clip again? Apparently we do. And you have the right to know the potential benefit of any intervention. For example, Pfizer reported that its vaccine shows a 95% efficacy. That sounds like it protects you 95% of the time, right?

Starting point is 02:11:57 But that's not actually what that number means. That 95% refers to the relative risk reduction, but it doesn't tell you how much your overall risk is reduced by vaccination. For that, we need absolute risk reduction. In the Pfizer trial, 8 out of 18,198 people who were given the vaccine developed COVID-19. In the unvaccinated placebo group, 162 people got it, which means that even without the vaccine, the risk of contracting COVID-19 was extremely low. Similar, by the way, in cases with the flu or anything else. COVID was way, way less in this regard, but it's the same kind of blowing up numbers for most everything.

Starting point is 02:12:38 0.88%, which the vaccine then reduced to 0.04%. So the net benefit, or the absolute risk reduction that you're being offered with a Pfizer vaccine, is 0.84%. That 95% number, that refers to the relative difference between 0.88 and 0.04%. And that's what we're dealing with right now. Right? Now, in the FSC side, at the same point, relative. So what they're doing is they're taking what they claim is the efficacy of the first one, and what they claim is the efficacy of the second one,

Starting point is 02:13:10 and then saying, look at this difference. This one is 95% or whatever the number. I'll go back in a second. But in reality, it's not. It's only the difference between the two. And if you're talking about a small number, well, if you're looking at absolute, it would be very different. It's a game.

Starting point is 02:13:25 It's a game of numbers. It's what they do. 4%. That's what they call 95% relative risk reduction. And relative risk reduction is well known to be a misleading number, which is why the FDA recommends using absolute risk reduction instead. And yet they don't. Which begs the question,

Starting point is 02:13:42 how many people would have chosen to take the COVID-19 vaccines had they understood that they offered less than 1% benefit? Yeah, probably nobody, guys, and that's why they lie to you. That's how this works. So back to the point, it says that translated, to a relative efficacy of 27%. So imagine what that goes down to. 27% relative efficacy

Starting point is 02:14:04 probably goes down to 0.0 something percent if you're comparing it too. That's the real point. It says, but those taking the Moderna shot reported more side effects, more. Nearly two thirds reported, and always, if you remember COVID-19,

Starting point is 02:14:21 wildly downplayed. Because what happens is they find people that get super ill, super quick, and they shoot them off and say, well, it couldn't have been the vaccine. It happened too fast, even though it very well could have. Or people that get, you know, something else where they say, oh, it's a carryover from something with their family line, you know, whatever.

Starting point is 02:14:37 They have ways they just, or people that get sick and they shove them off the course for any number of reasons. Plenty of that happened during COVID. Now, two-thirds reported injection site pain. Two-thirds. I still find that insane that we pretend like that's normal. 45% reported fatigue, 38% reported headache rates about two times twice. as much, two times greater than those of the competitor.

Starting point is 02:14:59 So you're getting twice as many side effects. And it says three-day hospitalization in one case, a case of pericarditis, perimicroditis. So right there, what you're talking about, if that's even accurate, which I almost guarantee it's not, you're talking about one out of 41,000. Excuse me, one out of 21,000. Do the math. Do you want that statistic? Do you want that possible heart problem for a flu shot?

Starting point is 02:15:24 I mean, my God, like, it's just this insane that we even rationalize this. And it says the FDA's initial refusal to review the Moderna vaccine was a highly unusual move toward an established company that conducted a large and generally positive clinical trial. Hold on a second. You literally just wrote up here that they had more negative side effects than the other shot. And you go on to call that a positive clinical trial in the next paragraph. Now, that's either them just playing their role as a propaganda platform or they somehow actually think that that's a positive outcome in the bro.

Starting point is 02:15:57 broken, dangerous vaccine world we live in. I don't know which one. It makes more sense. The reality, guys, is that one, I mean, just one heart problem out of 21,000, do the math when it comes to everybody in this country. Somebody do the math for me. I just didn't do it today. I don't have a calculator in front of me.

Starting point is 02:16:13 Like the idea that that's insane amount of people that will get heart problems based on their numbers, and I can almost guarantee that it's more than that, especially since you have that many people, 45% of the people, or more than that even, well, that's, you know, half the people have some kind of a problem, if not more. I just find it to be insane, truly. And we're not even getting in to the deeper reality of this, just what they state. Remember what they stated about COVID-19?

Starting point is 02:16:38 Shots? Dr. Prasad's chief criticism of Moderna's flu vaccine application was that it compared the company's vaccine with one made by GlaxoSmithKline. That is not considered the best in class. So you literally took a bad shot so that this one would look better. Tell me again about that gold standard, RFK Jr. about the placebo saline.

Starting point is 02:16:59 Such a tactic in Dr. Prasad's view was meant to skew the results. So here's my point. Persad, whatever you think about him, clearly didn't want this and said, we're not even reviewing that. Then, now, I forget, actually, has he still in the administration? Let me know. I'm forgetting which one actually left.

Starting point is 02:17:13 My point is, whatever happened, somebody overruled him. And if he did leave, it's because, in my opinion, that this is being pushed forward. That's what I would believe anyway. Let me know in the chat. Actually, I'm curious. I forget which one, because I know that you're, because that's what's so.

Starting point is 02:17:26 crazy about this. So many people in this administration have just dropped off and left, which is not that crazy. The last one was the same kind of way. So included those. So here, this is Toby Rogers, who put this out and says, we got played. We talked about her, actually. Fauci was yelled out in the Senate. Then they turned around and approved the COVID shot pusher, Erica Schwartz, as CDC director. He's right. And the FDA approved the MRNA shot. So he's going, we were played, right? I mean, I get it. Not everybody sees what we see.

Starting point is 02:18:03 But my point was, to be fair, this was clear from day one, right? I mean, you could point to the Stargate platform. You could point to the self-amplifying link that I include. So I'm just, it's not a tack. I mean, not everybody can see it. My point is just, let's be clear, guys. It's important to look back with clarity. It was there.

Starting point is 02:18:19 It was there from the beginning. If you just cared to look at it and stopped listening to what politicians said that they were doing, as opposed to what they were actually doing. Now, again, you would have known about all this back in 2025 about the flu shot direction, universal shot that's going in, the continuing of the COVID shots if you follow this platform. Just demonstrating our value. Got it today.

Starting point is 02:18:45 Maduro's new MRNA flu shot, June. Oh, and this was the one we were showing. Moderna's MRNA flu vaccine backed by FDA advisors. Me and Derek both talked about this. Derek and I both talked about this. And got a lot of, like, you can just look at the tweets. He were like, you're so stupid, you find. Not that we didn't know, the point was this seems like this is there.

Starting point is 02:19:06 Well, the point I made at the time was, well, the FDA advisors aren't necessarily representative of the administration. But I do believe that's where it's going. And we turn out to be correct. And then let's not forget, in June 13th, a few days later, over a billion dollars to Pfizer for new COVID shots. So we have Moderna coming out for flu shot. You have Pfizer right now working on two new COVID shots, one for adults, one for kids. That's on top of the current community shot they're still giving and the self-implifying ones they're currently working on.

Starting point is 02:19:34 Clearly, they ended COVID-19 MRI shots, right, guys, clearly based evidence by the five ones they're working on. Now, here is the shot itself, and this is the MRNA 101 we talked about, compared with a licensed influenza vaccine. Just continue to think that's insane. It's just in case you want to see it directly on their own website. Oh, and this was from March 2nd. Oops, don't go.

Starting point is 02:19:57 Thank you very much. sorry, I almost refresh the page. FDA accepts Moderna's MRNA 101 influenza vaccine application, March 2nd. And I want to point out, remember what it said on the COVID shot that we got all this pushback for at the time? Investigational influenza vaccine. So yet again, here we are with an experiment because that's what that means, guys. And they tried to lie about it then, and we proved it then.

Starting point is 02:20:21 And it was. It still says that experimental, investigational. So here we are with another experiment being given. to your family, to your loved ones. Time to wake up. Now, at the same time, what just happened in the military? Pentagon restores mandatory flu shots for all recruits amid boot camp outbreak. So, however you read this guys, where it's RFK or Trump or anybody else, they're either not allowed to stop this or don't actually care.

Starting point is 02:20:51 And I'll include the article we go over, amplitude, therapeutics. And I forget the other name that, you know, the still, the cell. amplifying MRI shots are in the works, but it's been working for a long time. And then Toby Rogers included the study, or this is just a link to the vaccine injury post, but he talks about the shedding. And he goes, people who get the MRI, COVID and flu shots are going to shed and make everyone around them sick. MRNA vaccinated people are vectors of man-made disease.

Starting point is 02:21:18 The rest of us are going to have to take an MRANA vaccine injury treatment protocol prophylactically. Now, you can decide if he's accurate about that. Here's the link if you want to check it out. I just don't want to advocate for that. I'm not, you know, who knows what you could look for yourself. But I want to just highlight again, this is something that is very, it's not new. There's new studies being pointed to acting like it just got proven.

Starting point is 02:21:41 Some of the McCullough connected elements. But I think that this has been very clear and hopefully agree with me. Going back to the beginning, this is 2021. COVID vaccine shedding data, 2021. And these aren't my pen. And some of them at the early parts were my thoughts. But the science has been very clear. Dr. Luigi Warren and plenty of others we actually pointed out.

Starting point is 02:22:00 I just forgot that name earlier. Let me see if that pops up. Let's see. I don't think so. Luigi. No. Has anybody spelled Luigi? Anyway, it used to pop up when I searched for his name, but you guys remember.

Starting point is 02:22:19 He was the expert on it. He came out and said, you know, well, yes, it looks like it does shed and clearly. And then he said, but it's not enough to actually hurt because it's only the one. And then we proved that it wasn't, that it continued to shed and it continued to make more. And so the point is the evidence. became undeniable, that even from the experts, it became clear that the spike protein, because it was making more than one and circulated your blood, it continues to. In fact, on that too, this one, there we go. Oh, that's not it. Shoot. Man, nothing's popping up for me anymore.

Starting point is 02:22:59 Red Cross used to come up to. Shoot. If somebody has that link, please send it to me, because that's that one I used to bring up showing the red cross continuing to lie about the shot. exactly the same way that it's circulated your bloodstream. Shoot. Oh, well, it's been so long since that I don't see him anymore. But anyway, let's continue. Shetting. Here it is in 2021 as well.

Starting point is 02:23:24 Spike protein shedding. In fact, this might even have it, but no, not popping up. This is 2021 April. COVID vaccine shedding. Don't shed on me. Here's one from 2025. AstraZeneca's flu mist shedding. The other one that they were supporting.

Starting point is 02:23:44 Okay, now just to finish this segment, here's Ben Shapiro coming out and saying this, this will Sean Davis highlights Ben Shapiro promoting this in 2020, simply saying, no matter how much you hate Trump, if you like the country, you should be rooting for Trump to listen to Fauci. Well, that aged well, didn't it? And Sean Davis says, all-time classic. Ben Shapiro comes in and says, this was the only time that Tucker was visiting Mar-Logger or reportedly begging Trump to put an end to the lockdown. I oppose lockdowns and towers, whatever, trying to defend what he said there.

Starting point is 02:24:16 Not going to work. Luke Radowski comes in and says, no, I'm not hounding him. It keeps popping up in my feed because we talked about it, but I'm going to call it out when I see it. He says, you told everyone to get the vaccine, the consequences of which are very severe for a lot of people. So I simply said, okay, well, I said, well, you supported the man who created it and still pushes it. The consequences of which are very severe for a lot of people. I'm just making a point, right? Which is I got it down here.

Starting point is 02:24:42 I said, I was just making a point. It wasn't about, you know, and I think we go on to discuss it. I said, he said, keyword is supported as if, you know, he does anymore. And I said, it's fair. But literally anyone was not hypercritically virtue signaling to Ben Shapiro about something he himself has done. Like, that's why I called it out because we have to be honest about the fact that what you're doing is trying to stand underneath Ben, who is a much bigger culprit and going,

Starting point is 02:25:05 you did the thing. Well, to be fair, you did it too, right? I mean, like, that's just, I feel like it's a fair thing to do right there. to make sure here's actually the reason I did this is because I think right now there's a lot of people in this middle ground who are very kind of going through the motions about this you know, hey, what do you think of this?

Starting point is 02:25:22 Oh, look at this. Maybe we should go. It's not, in my opinion, it's not, anyway, I think what's happening has got a lot of people like this who are trying to play into this new wherever we're going and trying to restate.

Starting point is 02:25:36 You know, I look at a lot of like the people that kind of were on the tail into COVID that came in at the end acting like they're the ones that broke the story. you know, or people that are now suddenly 9-11 experts who barely ever talked about it or suddenly, you know, it's like that's what I feel happening with a lot of this stuff again. So I just feel like it's worthy of calling it out. Look, you want to call out something I've made a mistake on or that I was wrong about.

Starting point is 02:25:56 I welcome it. Bring it on. So that's what I think it's important that we have that going on. But it doesn't have to be snipey. You know, that's what I think the whole thing with a lot of this fake, you know, Candace and Fuentes and all this stuff is sort of just like about per. They become the story, not necessarily about them being a part of the coverage of it, right? But let me see where we are on time here, about two and a half.

Starting point is 02:26:20 Okay, I think I'm going to go through this, but we already pretty much did. There's a lot to get into doing this, but we might just end up going over it for the most part. But this is what got my mind in this again today. So we recently covered this. House approves Israel-U.S. military merger. That was the NDAA part of it. Last I checked, the Senate hasn't done it yet. major U.S. war crimes and Iran, and of course, Trump's new gain of function. That's how I framed

Starting point is 02:26:42 this. I do agree with this, and it wasn't just about this one point. So again, the same point applies today. It's not saying this is exactly that, but this is this similar direction and similar ways that overlap with that kind of playing God part of this. And I very much stand by that. We're talking about viruses that infect bacteria and then are used for multiple things. And that's the bacteriophage or it was bacteriophage or the phage bacteria system. They're synonymous. And so what I covered in this. We also covered the RFK lying about ending gain of function for the second time recently.

Starting point is 02:27:24 And then I'll go over that in a second. We went back to it. Now, this comes out after we just talked about this. And I had just kind of randomly, I forget how I think somebody sent it to me. I forget how I came across this, probably Angela. And I saw this topic. And I thought, well, that's pretty strange. Like, it's a weird thing.

Starting point is 02:27:39 And it was about virus infecting thing. You know, it just sounded very similar, right? And so I dove into this and I was kind of shocked by what I found. And that, again, that was on the 23rd of July. So now this comes out. Artificial intelligence used to design brand new viruses. So there's multiple things in that. One of which is what we've talked about a long time, which is using AI to create vaccines

Starting point is 02:28:04 and gain, like, virus, all kinds of horrible things, which are all We all know is in that same direction. So what I found interesting, this is actually about the system I discussed. It says artificial intelligence has been used to design brand new viruses that are fully functional and can replicate in the laboratory. So is that, tell me that's not exactly what we were worried about. Now it says in the first time, it is the first time, whole genomes have been successfully designed by AI.

Starting point is 02:28:33 That's terrifying. The resulting 16 novel viruses were created to, infect bacteria that they say pose no threat to people. Well, I disagree based on any number of other peer-reviewed science studies that I'll show you. The breakthrough has been labeled a very significant turning point in science that could unlock a new era for treating disease. Now, where this largely comes from, and this is what's so frustrating to me, is that antibiotics are what this is currently largely being framed as filling the role of, and the only reason that's necessary is because, because they so grossly overused antibiotics, they've created a whole world of multi-drug-resistant

Starting point is 02:29:14 problems, bacteria viruses. And so what happens is that now that's becoming a problem, well, they just, they shift. And then reason, by the way, for the longest time, it's not that new. This whole phage bacteria overlap has been something that's been there. People argue as safer, but they haven't because antibiotics are a thing to use. And so now that it's becoming so, I mean, people have been talking about antibiotic-resist, things for so long. It's been a problem on the radar forever, and they just don't care because corporate interests seem to run the day for a long time.

Starting point is 02:29:48 And so now, because they can't seem to get away from that, and they see the problem not going away, this is the new direction. So I just hate the idea of that. They just drive that thing into the ground, destroy something that was working, and still could be probably more beneficial than this, outside of playing God. And now they just need to manipulate this into being something that will work. because of their failed. Rather, they're, they're, what's the way to frame that?

Starting point is 02:30:11 Something they knew was failing that they could have stopped, but they kept going anyway because money, even though, like, the short-sightedness is disastrous. And it goes for everything they're doing, like in a real sense. Like, you look at the stuff they do today. It's just crazy. But continuing, the resulting 16 novel viruses, doesn't this feel exactly like what we were just going through?

Starting point is 02:30:33 We're created to infect bacteria that pose no threat to people, so we're told. The breakthrough has been labeled a very significant point in science that unlock new air for disease. But experts have also warned AI design viruses raise urgent safety security concerns. Cool. So we're right back in the swing of things, it seems. This is a next step in the complexity that designable by generative AI. So basically telling you that we're going to get to a point to where these things can just be literally designed.

Starting point is 02:31:00 That's what we've been worried about. This is the first time generative AI has been used to design a computer. genome. It's something that can replicate and have other functions inside cells. See, this is terrifying in its own direction. Even beyond the phage bacteria system, you're talking about AI creating living things. It's something

Starting point is 02:31:20 that can replicate and have other functions inside cells. On top of that, things that can be wildly manipulative. This was new territory for us, Brian High says, at Stanford. Technology works similarly to large language models like chat GPT.

Starting point is 02:31:36 Oh, that makes me feel better. In this instance, AI models known as Evo 1 and Evo 2 predict the language of life rather than words. Unnerving. The AI models were trained on genetic codes from viruses, bacteria, plants, people. They were then refined to produce a type of virus known as a bacteriophage. I don't put an end there for some reason. Bacteri phage phageae, which infect only specific species of bacteria. You know, unless something goes awry, you know, unless something genetically modified acts a way you don't expect, because that's never happened before, right?

Starting point is 02:32:15 The Stanford researchers picked the most promising 302 AI designs and synthesized them in a lab of the 16 proved proved effective at killing E. coli bacteria. Developing new phage bacteria could lead to new ways of treating infections that have become resistant to antibiotics. and why have they become resistant to antibiotics? Because you guys are completely, because the powerful don't care about what they're doing to the world when they're immediately making a profit. Look at every industry. But the breakthrough also points to the ability of AI

Starting point is 02:32:51 to design new biology that goes beyond the natural world. Full stop. Don't let it happen. Too late. What is known as synthetic biology. But concerns have already been raised that the same technology could be used. maliciously to create new diseases.

Starting point is 02:33:09 Okay, then why are we letting that happen? Because the powerful don't care. They're the same ones writing this article to you, giving you the downside, while gaslighting you into accepting it. In a commentary accompanying the publication in the journal Science, Dr. Thomas Inglesby and Dr. Moritz, Hank, or Hankie, from the Center for Health Security at Johns Hopkins University,

Starting point is 02:33:29 you know where all the good stuff comes from, that the findings raised, quote, urgent biosafety and biosecurity questions. See, here's the thing as always. These things raise concerns and questions and there's dangers and unknowns, and yet they rush into it for their own interests, probably funded by some company that's desperately needing a solution to resistant drugs. You know, it's like, that's where this comes from.

Starting point is 02:33:51 They said it was no longer a question of whether generative viral genome designs will exist, but whether it can be used without enabling serious harm. Oh, cool. I'm glad we just jumped into that. So we don't, it's not whether or not, it's hoping this doesn't go awry while we're in the middle of it. I mean, have we not learned from this, guys? This is the point. They don't care.

Starting point is 02:34:11 We learned because we saw. They knew and didn't care. And they still don't care now. For example, they said new viruses with potential to cause disease should not be pursued. Okay. So the government will swear. We're not focusing on the dangerous ones like their lie of gain of function. But the point becomes one of two things.

Starting point is 02:34:32 What if they lied? And two, what if anybody else chooses to pick up this thing and do bad things with it? The researchers themselves took steps to maximize safety. They excluded viruses that could infect complex organisms from the training database, perform the research on phage rather than viruses that infect people, and it all took place in a secure laboratory. Well, guessing that one example, we hope that they're not lying to us and that would all work out. He, hi, argued, even existing safeguards.

Starting point is 02:35:02 go a long way towards ensuring that the technology is used for good, meaning that it's simple with your safeguards or not, it could be used for bad. That's just a basic understanding of the English language. Professor Mark Gould from the synthetic biology lab at Promu Fabra University in Spain said that the study was a very significant turning point because for the, quote, first time in history we are beginning to design biology on a computer.

Starting point is 02:35:32 He said it, quote, allows us to dream of exciting possibilities for tackling humanity's greatest challenges, such as developing phages to tackle disease, enzymes, to treat genetic disorders and antibodies that could be used in immunotherapy. Yeah, I mean, this is the pie in the sky possibility. Like, it's great. But see, that's not what it always goes to. It becomes commodified. It becomes monetized and it becomes abused. Like every other thing the U.S. government has ever touched. And it's always how this goes. And I hate to say it like that, guys, but look, the reality is that business, and everything else and interest and the people that are currently in charge today, look at what they're doing.

Starting point is 02:36:08 The idea that it will only, and see, the scientist himself is like, this will be great, we can do this, we can save that, but they're not the ones that decide how this gets applied. Quote, the significance extends far beyond phages. It suggests that genome language models are beginning to learn the design principles encoded by evolution, opening the door to AI-assisted genome writing. God only knows. what these people will do with that. Now, live science back on October 6, 2025, AI can now be used to design brand new viruses. Can we stop it from making the next devastating bio-webbing?

Starting point is 02:36:48 Sure, we can write the article stating that, but I guess we'll just hold our breath and hope they don't. And again, that's my point about this. That's what I saw in this and more. Now, just, I guess, to focus on some of the important parts, again, we talked about RFK lying about this. in 2024, interestingly, this connects back with Fauci and the shot and everything else. We talked about gain of function is back. Now, this is under Biden, even though it was ongoing under Trump and Bush and Obama before them. The point is, this is the video that I was highlighting, gain of function research on H5N1. This is from 13 years ago.

Starting point is 02:37:27 Look who we're looking at. Right there. That's Dr. Fauci sitting right there, 2012. My point in showing you this is simply that this is. is something that has been ongoing for a very long time. Fauci's been building the same direction. I just want to include that. I just thought it was interesting.

Starting point is 02:37:40 Now, gain of function head fake on 2025. That was an important one as well, talking about the lie of them pretending to stop it. We'll include this as well, talking about the gain of function direction for the kind of, some of it was building proteins to do whatever. This is the magneto ferretin protein shot. That's one of the universal flu directions

Starting point is 02:38:01 where they use ferret nanoparticles and which peer, viewed scientists shown how that can then be used from outside sources to manipulate plenty of processes in your body. And this is just, I just included, I think it's crazy. Donald Trump rolls out the AI biomedical control grid back by Israel and the deep state. Just an R-I'll title to catch people in the early part of the Trump administration. Otherwise known as Stargate, as Derek wrote about.

Starting point is 02:38:26 Stargate, Trump partnered with technocrats to promote MRNA injections, AI, and transhumanism. Funny how it's all coming together right in front of you. like it was all a plan. Now this one's interesting. This is one of the reasons of the titles way it was today. Evolution, from the platform, Oxford Academic. 2020, 2018,

Starting point is 02:38:48 gain of function experiments with bacteriophage, Lambda, uncover residues under diversifying selection in nature. Since we studied a model virus, bacteriophage, that repeatedly evolves to exploit a new host receptor under typical laboratory conditions. Now, I want to stress that what we're really talking about here

Starting point is 02:39:09 is using bacterophaned in the process of gain function. But my point is simply highlighting that there's an overlap to this. And then we can get into the points I've shown, including my last show, that show you that there's concerns, very clear risks about the general direction and of itself. But I just found it incredibly interesting to see that it's literally actually used

Starting point is 02:39:28 in the process of this experimentation. And it says here we demonstrate that two residues of the J protein are required for the new function. And that's the bacteriophage. That's the little symbol they're using. And it says in natural bacterial phage variants, these amino acid sites are highly diverse and evolve at high rates. Insertions and deletions at these locations are associated with phylogenic patterns

Starting point is 02:39:53 indicative of ecological diversification. Our results show that viral evolution in laboratory mirrors that nature and that laboratory experiments can be coupled with protein sequence analysis to identify the causes of viral evolution in the real world. Gain a function of experiments with bacterial fange. So briefly, here's one from World Health Organization and just simply says, can there be dangerous, right? And it says, nonetheless, there are some risks because like antibiotics, phages can cause

Starting point is 02:40:23 the release of endotoxins, toxic substances from bacterial cell walls, leading to inflammatory responses, especially in large-scale infections. Further evidence from clinical studies and monitoring are needed before phages can become widely available, which question is, is that happening? Or is it like the COVID direction, MRA, where they just jammed it in before we even knew what was going on? The bottom line for me is that this is just one, we're going to go through more, but there are clear damage risks.

Starting point is 02:40:51 And I'm not even suggesting they're as dangerous as some of the most extreme we've talked about, but it's about whether or not this is being properly vetted or this is just what they see as their next interest. bacteria can develop resistance to phages, just like they can develop resistance to antibiotics. So how long until we now have to deal with the phage resistant drugs? And then we'd have nowhere to go. You know, it's like this just, they don't seem to have any foresight. But phage resistant bacteria are often less harmful.

Starting point is 02:41:16 Okay. Like many personal and often, meaning not all the time, like many personalized medicines, phages currently struggle to meet regulations designed for conventional medicines produced to a single formulation. You know, why? Because this is your tailor design. drug dynamic. See, the problem with this, or possibly the solution that some people look at it, is that this needs to be tailored individually to what you can deal with and what you're

Starting point is 02:41:40 dealing with in regard to the issue. It's very clear. And so the point becomes, how do you ever, like, test for the efficacy? How do you ever see, and this is the problem, is that that's right now, as you read into this, you find it ultimately, if it's specific to the person and in the situation, that ultimately there's no real way to make to prove that it actually is safe. in the long-term sense because they're different or are effective even, you know, even though it seems in many cases they're arguing that they are arguing they're safe.

Starting point is 02:42:10 There seems to be a lot of underlying like, but we really don't know by the scientists looking at what they're claiming is safe. Further evidence from clinical studies and monitoring are needed before phages can become widely available for therapeutic uses. The path to regulatory approval for the therapy needs to be addressed due to their biological nature and the need for personalized therapy approaches. regulators may consider setting clinical trials and manufacturing standards for phages that reflect their unique characteristics and specify for each patient treated.

Starting point is 02:42:38 Well, that's not going to happen. They're going to make this a one-size-fits-all I could do with everything. 2017, bacteriophages are potential new mammalian pathogens or as potential new pathogens themselves. It says there was an increase in markers of impaired gut permeability. Now, this seems to be a real focus. this issue of gut permeability and what they can do in specifically the stomach, such as the lactose manitol ratio, plasma endotoxin concentrations, and serum levels of inflammation-related cytokines.

Starting point is 02:43:12 Very similar to something related with COVID-19, the shots, rather. These findings provide novel insights into the role of bacteriophages as potentially pathogenic, pathogenic for mammals, that's you, and their possible implications in the debate. development of diseases associated with increased intestinal permeability. That's actually the phrase they use, the intestinal permeability. I believe that was it on this. There's more, the new studies go over it more. 2024, bacteriophages, dangerous, I guess we'll just go through it.

Starting point is 02:43:46 Bacteriofages, dangerous viruses acting incognito or underestimated saviors in the fight against bacteria. So see, this is like not, this is very, this is 2024, right? And these are still going like, are these even what they say they are? It says, a specific issue is the problem of bacterial infections of the gastrointestinal tract. Although phage therapy may be effective in the eradication of the infectious bacteria. So sort of like, you know, chemotherapy, well, sure as hell kills the cancer, but what else is it kill? What else is it doing your body, right?

Starting point is 02:44:19 And it says the question arises as to whether significant changes in the composition of the gut microbiota, which is wildly important. The people are only finding that more out today. we should have known a long time ago, the question arises as to whether significant changes in the composition of the gut microbiota can be recognized as an adverse effect that can induce long-term negative consequences for you. Fange therapy still raises a lot of ambiguities and concerns,

Starting point is 02:44:50 especially because of the need to look for alternatives in fighting infections with antibiotic-resistant strains of bacteria. So more than one scientist is pointing this out that this seems to be a forced direction because of a problem that you created. It is crucial to assess whether bacterial phages are our allies or as they possibly phrase as or they as they pose as a possibility or Trojan horses that can stimulate the immune system in an uncontrolled way. Damn it, guys. That's exactly what we went through during COVID-19. Immunic compromised, immunosuppressed and all of which was happening based on what your body reacted to the dangerous things they were putting in it. and it says, or disrupt the functioning of the nervous system and modify the composition of the

Starting point is 02:45:34 intestinal microbiota. Sure sounds important to me. They suggested that phage therapy is generally safe and well tolerated. That's what you get from most of these main studies. It says, however, due to the lack of sufficient data, the negative effects of bacteriophane interactions with the eukaryotic cells, it cannot be unequivocally ruled out, especially as there are references indicating that phages may stimulate the human immune system in ways that are not fully understood so far.

Starting point is 02:46:01 And from what I can sell, most of the reference points to whether it's generally safe, go back before these kind of studies. It's 2024. Now, it says many studies on phage therapy focused on its effectiveness. And this is just like the shots, right? Does it do the thing? Yes. It's different than, is it safe for you?

Starting point is 02:46:20 And then usually you go retroactively find out that it didn't even do the thing, not the way they said it did. But it goes on to say the studies focused on its effectiveness. them, sometimes marginalizing aspects of the safety. Pretty common. Or potential interactions with a million immune systems. That seems to be the focal point, which can be negative with long-term use. Is this the new way to have people just perpetually sick?

Starting point is 02:46:42 In this regard, not only the route of administration, but also the location of the infection, which determines the potential direction of bacteriophage propagation to adjust tissue's organs can be crucial, meaning simply as well on top of all of it, the personalized element of this. And actually, I didn't go into it in depth in this. I found four or five different studies that talked about the improper application. That simply doing this, slightly askew, can cause terrible problems. But that's what they argue we know what we're doing.

Starting point is 02:47:10 Well, and we've heard that before. And it says, ratio of fange particles to bacterial cells, multiplicity of infection, MOU, or M-O-I, excuse me. It says to use the use of phage preparations with a high multiplicity of infection raises questions about the potential loss of efficacy with repeated use in short intervals due to production of antiphage antibodies. That stood out

Starting point is 02:47:36 and about the unpredictable effects of possible interactions with your your chaotic cells. Antifange antibodies? Guys, we're right back in the swing of this. That's the antibody dependent enhancement or variations therein about your body reacting. If you're producing antifange antibodies, well, that means when you put this in your body,

Starting point is 02:47:56 you'll end up essentially, you'll end up attacking yourself. If it ends up becoming something like where you're talking about viruses, infecting bacteria, and you have naturally occurring phages in your body. So if this somehow recognizes antifanged antibodies, or rather the fange itself as the problem and produces antifanged antibodies,

Starting point is 02:48:15 well, it'll attack natural parts of your body that it recognizes as the same thing. It's exactly what we saw during COVID. When analyzing the safety issues of phaids, therapy, it is also worth asking the fundamental question of why the immune system does not treat bacteriophages as classic, potentially dangerous viruses. It is estimated that more than 31 billion bacterial phages undergo transcytosis from the intestine to different areas of the organism every day.

Starting point is 02:48:46 In addition to being commonly found in the gut, bacterophages have been confirmed in saliva, urine, and peripheral blood, and have also been shown to propagate to various internal organs. Because bacteropages and their products are not, are non-self antigens, the immune system is able to recognize and react in that way. Theoretically, reduces the benefits of bacterophanes therapy. Meaning that in and of itself, a body reacting the way it normally does

Starting point is 02:49:13 would reduce what you claim is the benefit. But my thought is that if it's naturally in your body already, it seems very obvious the body could then create, like it just said, anti-fange antibodies, which then seems like it would start attacking you, your body. your gut. As somebody's pointing out, IG4 class switch.

Starting point is 02:49:29 And there's so many different, like I was talking about the, what was it, the interleukin 10. And what was that? Anyway, there's all these different connections to these different parts from COVID that stood out that just, it seems, feels too weirdly close to me that these things seem to be like almost deliberately, like it could be that these things are chosen for that connected point. Or it could be ultimately that we're talking about the direction that is the same.

Starting point is 02:49:54 Right? like they're trying to tool with the same types of things that end up in the same direction. But it's just so weird to me how much of this stands out is similar to what we just went through. But continuing, it says, where was I? The, in addition to the being commonly found of the gut, it says that because bacterial fanges and their products are non-self antigens, the presence of antibodies neutralizing the bacterial fanged T4, hosted by E. coli, were founded more than 80% of investigative persons, despite the fact that they had never received phage therapy, which means that this is either something that's been done or naturally occurring.

Starting point is 02:50:27 Either way, it seems to create a problem where your body starts to attack itself in that case. In the case of some phages, we may be dealing with the creation of special conditions in which the immune response is weakened, directly translating into the virulence of the bacteria and their viability. So in effect, creating the exact opposite of what it was done to do. But my point would be that just anything that seems to weaken your immune system seems to always be the focal point. nevertheless the fact that bacteriophages are able to exert a direct effect on the mammalian immune system cannot be denied that seems pretty clear the effect is anti-inflammatory and includes the impact on innate immunity via the modulation of the cytokine response as well as adaptive immunity through antibody production i mean lastly i think it says as the organism's response to viral infections is hormonally modulated

Starting point is 02:51:16 including a gender factor in this type of analysis may be crucial indeed i just found that interesting Seeing us how you're at a time when people are pretending like there's no difference, but ultimately this may scientifically force them to acknowledge a difference, to acknowledge what their body's natural makeup is. It says, as is evident from the above-mentioned examples, the question of assessing the safety of phage therapy is normally functioning animal or human organisms, especially during bacterial infection, is not easy.

Starting point is 02:51:44 The problem is even more complicated when the organism is weakened by a severe and or aggravating chronic disease. Oh, there's more here. see. So it says social and economic life has recently come to a standstill as a result of COVID-19. They write in this article. It was suggested that the special weapon and fight against both problems may be bacteriophages. So even they are connecting this with the COVID-19 experience. And it says the possibility for the use of modified bacteriophages through the phage display technique to produce specific antibodies against SARS-COP2 should not be overlooked. Seemed relevant? Protecting the organism from the phalae, consequences of a heightened immune response, especially the huge overproduction of cytokines.

Starting point is 02:52:29 Well, I just read in this and other studies that this very thing could in fact cause that itself. So it seems like an odd thing to include, but it says, importantly, bacteriophages are also present in the central nervous system as a result of their ability to penetrate the blood-brain barrier. There's correlating things here that align with whatever they're trying to accomplish, in my opinion. This raises the crucial question of whether this is a beneficial phenomenon or a serious cause for concern. Well, gee, I guess we'll just flip the coin and find out, huh? However, it says it is still not clear whether the changes in the composition and abundance of bacterial species as well as the parameters of bacterial fanges occurring in the gut are the cause of the effect of various

Starting point is 02:53:11 diseases. Basically, I mean, it just seems clear that this is something that we don't fully understand. That's the main part. Despite a great deal of research into their biology, including remarks, mechanisms of action, and potential interactions with the you charyotic cells, bacteriophages still seem to hold many secrets. The roles of bacteriophages in neurodegenerate diseases, cancers, or metabolic disorders are still unclear. That seems a bit insane to me. The roles they play in very serious diseases as you're about to put these things in our

Starting point is 02:53:44 bodies, it says, and even the determination if their effects are beneficial or destructive remains to be performed. Now, to be clear, you have things that are actually occurring, but what I'm talking about is the bacterophanes system where you're talking about. talking about viruses infecting bacteria and then using those in your body to treat certain issues. That's what this is about. And if we don't know how these things connect with neurodegenerative diseases and cancer, why would we be taking that chance?

Starting point is 02:54:10 The safety of bacteriophage and treatment of diseases caused by multi-drug resistant bacteria. This one goes really deep into the idea, you know, while fange therapy has generally been determined to be safe and tolerable among animals, the current research on phage safety monitoring lacks sufficient and consistent data. see how that works it's been safe and tolerable except the data doesn't give you enough

Starting point is 02:54:32 to make case of that it's sort of like flocks saying it does all these things and then you look and like the data doesn't back that up well there you go so what they do the reality of this study

Starting point is 02:54:41 shows you that the study the current research does not demonstrate the data that suggests that they claim it safe and tolerable I find that very alarming now this is a major safety concern

Starting point is 02:54:56 is the disruption of the body's microbiome. That's huge, which is a key regulator of human health. Another concern is the impact of phage on the immune system, which it may ultimately lead to chronic inflammation and other immune reactions. It is crucial to consider the potential risk of endotoxin contamination that could trigger the inflammatory cytokine response, like I just said. But yes, take it to save off the cytokine response during COVID-19. It says the use of contemporary phages may produce bacterial lysogens

Starting point is 02:55:25 that are resistant to the same phage type, potentially increasing their virulence. A few studies have reported transient inverse events or side effects during phage therapy, which include inflammation, flushing, hypotension, fever, the absence of standard protocol to evaluate the safe usage, like I was pointing out,

Starting point is 02:55:47 and preparation result in the lack of consistent, complete, and reliable data to conclude safety. That feels like we're being played, doesn't it? Like we don't know, but we're going to pretend we do, because it makes money, you can decide. This one, discussing, exploring the risks of phage application, the environment.

Starting point is 02:56:04 Now, just to quickly state this, there's so much I could read into this. I found this interesting. They're using phage bacteria systems in the environment for food and different things. And it turns out what they talk about is a, where was it? Horizontal gene flow through the process of transduction. it says given that phages facilitate horizontal gene flow. Now, what does that mean in the context of our bodies? Right now we're talking about in like food and the environment.

Starting point is 02:56:35 And it says the different effects, or was it, we must be aware of the potential dangers of phage-mediated horizontal gene transfer among pathogenic and non-pathogenic bacterial species. So it's the environment. Oh, and then the next one really overlaps with the, I'm trying to rush through these. It was this one. Yeah, the food chain.

Starting point is 02:56:56 So this one is novel biocontrol methods, biofilms and food production facilities. And it says bacterophages have been used in medical treatment for many years for their ability to infect and lie specific bacteria. It says endolysins and hydrolyetic enzymes of bacterophages responsible for breaking the cell wall of gram-positive bacteria are being explored as a biocontrol method for food preservation and in nanotechnology and medical applications.

Starting point is 02:57:29 2018. So jump forward. 2025. Risk profile of bacterial phages in food chain. And it says, phages are considered effective biocontrol agents for improving food safety due to the specific interactions with pathogens. It is essential to recognize that zero risk does not exist. And as biological agents, phages can be continuously evasks.

Starting point is 02:57:53 for potential adverse effects on human health in both food and clinical contexts. Must be, they said. This is the first bacterophanes risk profile performed. Hold the phone. It's 2025 in this study, June. It was a year ago. And it's been for years used in the environment, and it's been used in studies for medical. This is the first bacterophange risk profile performed according to the methodology

Starting point is 02:58:20 record. Okay. Well, that makes me feel better. key safety concerns regarding fange use in the food sector include the risk of horizontal gene transfer, especially regarding antibiotic resistant genes among bacteria. So it says despite newer studies affirming the safety of an efficacy of fages in the food chain, continuous monitoring remains crucial. In particular, the responses of susceptible populations to fange exposure should be carefully examined.

Starting point is 02:58:51 You know, I just, I bring this stuff for you guys. I mean, to me, seems like there's plenty to be concerned about here. But of course, as Luke Radowski does for us, the AI will take us all out. Well, well done. Well, you know, just to kind of end on that point to compare all the work we just did with that.

Starting point is 02:59:11 And I'm sure you guys can work out the new media, you know, whatever else you want to put these people in. I just, again, this just happened to pop up in my feed. So I feel like it's relevant to go, wow, you know, great work there. So futurism. also includes an article here that I wanted to highlight that I think is connected. Now, very different. Not even the same topic.

Starting point is 02:59:31 Before we finish with a couple points in Iran, I wanted to include this because I'm actually kind of blown away that this isn't even being talked about very much. August 3rd, 2026. The reason I want to highlight it is the use, kind of negligence, incompetence of people in power. It appears that the U.S. military accidentally killed. everybody on board a civilian Medevac flight in New Mexico. Now, you tell me why this is not wildly breaking news covering. I mean, it's insane because it's actually crazy the sounds.

Starting point is 03:00:02 And this is from futurism. A few days ago, when the federal aviation administration, under Donald Trump's administration, under the U.S. government, shut down air traffic to El Paso airport earlier this year, nobody could have guessed that an experimental, high-energy laser weapon was the cause. After days of chaos and speculation, it was revealed that Customs and Border Patrol officers or visuals, of course it was them. ICE most likely involved. I can only imagine fired off a laser volley from a U.S. Army base adjacent to El Paso.

Starting point is 03:00:36 It's probably Cash Patel or something. I mean, I'm kind of joking, but that's what I get from this. Like, they were just out there messing around with stuff that is this. But it says, though the trigger-happy Border Patrol grunts evidently thought they were firing a drug smuggling drones, or they made that. story up or they actually didn't know any better and shot it because not knowing what was going on. All of it makes sense to me. Their real target turned out to be a kid's party balloon. Regardless, it was later reported that the cutting edge weapon was taken for a test drive. A week before, FFFAA and Pentagon officials had a chance to discuss how to safely implement the laser device.

Starting point is 03:01:12 This is what it looks like to be run by what's currently going on. Think about it when serious and crazy that is. And they were like, let's shoot this thing off and see what happens. Like, that's insane to me. And again, the point is they didn't even understand how to operate this thing and they shot it and could have killed somebody and it was a child's party balloon. Making it and making it a small miracle that nobody was killed in the air. Now, that's the first part. Secondarily, new bombshell reporting by Wired reveals an incident in which the testing of an experimental GPS jammer resulted in a medical plane crashing into the side of a mountain. The horrifying incident happened in May.

Starting point is 03:01:50 The publication reports when a small twin engine, Medevac aircraft carrying two pilots and two medical workers departed from Roswell, New Mexico, heading west for a small mountain village, the crew became the victim of an electronic warfare exercise being conducted at the nearby White Sands Missile Range, a test which rendered their navigational system inoperable. Due to a combination of low visibility

Starting point is 03:02:13 and air traffic control that was stretched far beyond capacity. At least three other planes reported navigation disruptions due to the GPS jamming. The pilots failed to register the mountains formation between their plane and landing strip.

Starting point is 03:02:28 Unfortunately, their disoriented crew ran straight into the side of the mountain. They likely never saw resulting in the loss of every life on board. Civilian plane. Now, this is a story that's been talked about. What I think is crazy, first of all, is the idea that shooting off a laser beam,

Starting point is 03:02:43 the idea of what that shows you, the lack, like the, not incompetence, but the, like the juvenile nature, that's not even the right word, like the fact that they would do that. There's a word for that. I can't think of it. But on top of that, the idea of being so reckless with this test that you end up killing Americans flying in a way, nobody seems to like really care about that. I mean, it just shows you where we are, guys.

Starting point is 03:03:06 Now, think about whether or not they're concerned with testing out some new potentially life-ending virus bacteria dynamic or gain of function or vaccines or whatever. else we're talking about. Like this is the kind of people, these are the kind of people that we have in power. That speaks for itself. And of course, you might have seen this. And you already know, because we talked about this at the time. Dave DeCamp talked about it this time. 2025, Yemen. U.S. massacre civilian workers and paramedics and attack on Yemen. The reason it's coming back up today, because it's going back around. Documents and sources indicate that U.S. airstrikes in Yemen last year, because it's only just now being verified somehow, even though

Starting point is 03:03:47 we proved it then, and so did Dave, that last year killed a wound at hundreds of civilians. The Pentagon has not publicly acknowledged the reported casualties or provided Congress with a full accounting. Nobody, the guys, they're just murdering people everywhere in the world, and nobody seems to care to stop them. And on that note, to do this quickly, because I did read that longer than I wanted to,

Starting point is 03:04:12 but that's interesting, isn't it? We're hot in here. Iran says, Iran says close to Hormuz plan with Oman. But reopening depends on the U.S. Simple enough. Simply means that Iran and Oman have agreed to a route for their ships, which funny how we've been telling you that since April, right?

Starting point is 03:04:36 Because, and I wouldn't say at the beginning, I wasn't saying I knew that. I was saying that's what Iran is saying. That's what Oman is saying. They're talking about the future. And what Trump says makes no sense with that, right? And so we wondered, we wondered, we questioned, and more than, more than once, he would round about his lies and it kept becoming more clear.

Starting point is 03:04:52 And at this point then, it got to the point to where Ron was saying that. It was okay, well, that seems like obviously happening. What's the alternative? They're making all this up, but they consistently get shown to be right. And so at the end of the day, after this last, it will spur and Trump pretended like he was, we were now dealing with them again. They begged me to come to a deal. I said, that's just not true.

Starting point is 03:05:11 He's not talking to them. They're not even engaging. And Iran made that clear. Here they are talking with Oman. and then you got Trump and Rubio on the side going, we're in the middle of negotiations. Everyone's laughing at them. That's how stupid this is.

Starting point is 03:05:23 Now, they've agreed to their route, which is the same route they were already using, the same route that Trump signed on an MOU, and the same route that Trump has been forcing ships to ignore and Iran firing on them, but not sinking them in order to shut them back from crossing the wrong way. Then Trump would go, they're firing,

Starting point is 03:05:39 and they broke the MOU. It's just laughable. It says the agreement would be a step towards reopening the key energy route. But official sources briefing Iran media stressed that it still hinges on whether Donald Trump and the U.S. government decide to let it happen. Because the truth is, even though they're completely failing in all of this

Starting point is 03:05:58 and don't have the ability to actually take what they want, they could just sit there with their military ships in the water and effectively stop anybody, which, by the way, has been pretty much what's been holding this up the entire time. Iran has exercised and de facto control the waterway and threatened any vessels transiting like they have from, you know, that's the route agreed upon.

Starting point is 03:06:16 If you go that route, then we're going to stop you. They're not bombing and sinking ships. They're simply resist, not restraint, but, you know, what's the word I'm looking for? Just firing on them to get and turn around without sinking the ship. I don't know why I can think of the word. U.S. Donald Trump has, President Donald Trump has repeatedly insisted Tehran is keen for a deal.

Starting point is 03:06:38 But Iran has denied this, as of today, and said it will instead make arrangements with its neighbor on the straight. I'm on. So think about how embarrassingness is for him that even, right to today, they're going like, Trump is not even involved. And they said it yesterday. They said it before. So that's the reality of that.

Starting point is 03:06:57 And Trump today, the straight is sort of open right now. That's doom. Bah. It's like, that's just embarrassing. This is not hard to see, ladies and gentlemen. Now, I'll just skip this,

Starting point is 03:07:13 but the bottom line is Trump was asked, very clearly. I mean, I'll just play it really quickly. Might as well. So this is the last thing it would be done. At least the fifth time you've turned off air strikes against Iran since April. This is what just recently when he stopped him at the last second. It was going to be worse than World War II. Who may, I mean, who knows what they were going to do?

Starting point is 03:07:30 The point is that he stopped and the whole plane acted like they were dealing and Iran was the one saying we're dealing with Oman and you're not involved. So somebody called him out and said, well, you know, you've done this like five times. Like, what was different this time? To negotiate. What is your message to the American people who are wondering what has changed this time? Why should it be any different?

Starting point is 03:07:49 Well, you don't know. I don't know. I think we're going to maybe get something, but I want to give them every later. By the way, so his answer was, I don't know, kind of weird will get something? Because from here on it goes into something different. Best chance before decapitation. Very tough to do what we have planned, still planned. So decapitation.

Starting point is 03:08:11 Like just, you know, just horrible bombing that kills lots of civilians and whatever. else. So reality being that what he said is nothing. And the answer is, well, I don't, we want to give them every possible chance before we do the thing. But every single time you have this response, you tell us that nothing, they're making a deal, they're begging me for a deal. No, they're not. We're going to borrow them. We're begging me for a deal. So there's no moving of the needle. So it's not like we need some kind of, what would one more step do? That's why the question was there. The point of the post was like Trump has nothing to say. this is at least the fifth this time.

Starting point is 03:08:47 Why should it be any different? Well, you don't know, I don't know. I think we're going to. You don't know, I don't know. I think we're going to get something. That's actually his answer. You don't know, I don't know. Maybe we'll get something.

Starting point is 03:08:56 I can't even believe that. Maybe you get something, but I want to give him every last chance before decapitation. Very tough to do. Love about that who are desperate to support him is they want to frame that as the ambiviv of the benevolent Trump who just reluctantly doesn't want to kill them. You know, you mean aside from bombing innocent people the entire time? time. It's just silly what people will believe. What we have planned, still planned. We'll see what happens.

Starting point is 03:09:22 But it's a very, very tough thing to do. I think I'm very proud of the fact that I will give people, I'll give people a chance. This is a big. Oh, he gives himself credit. How unique for Trump to turn it about himself? How rare asked a question about something else. And he goes, I'm great. What I did was good. I'm the best one. He's just so trans. It's like it's, it's a a tick for him. To do an attack that big on a country, I'd rather not do it. Now, we've already threw lots of large attacks, but they wouldn't. Funny there is now he competed with his own ego right there.

Starting point is 03:09:58 Oh, wait, but I did do a lot. It was big. So now I'm going to counterbalance that with, but I didn't do a lot. It was very big. You got to saying, you know, like we didn't want to do a lot. But oh, but we did a lot, though. It's like, it's like two people in his mind that it's like, well, I can't, I can't pretend like I didn't do a lot because that would make me look weak.

Starting point is 03:10:13 My impression, my impression, but I think it's very spot on. Normal large. Normal large. Hopefully they'll come to their senses because what happened, you know. Wait a minute, come to their senses. Didn't you just say they were begging you for a deal? That doesn't make sense. Cannot have a nuclear weapon, but hopefully they'll come to their senses.

Starting point is 03:10:34 So they call me and they said, please don't attack. We'll make it. Okay, but what do you mean? That means they came to their census, though, right? So if they want a deal, then they've not come, they came to the census. But right now you're saying your hope they come to their senses. You see how dumbness is? Like they don't think this through.

Starting point is 03:10:51 Like there's nobody walking through this with them going, whoa, whoa, whoa, that's just stupid Trump. No one's going to buy that. I don't know what, I don't know where is this supposed like, you know, team of people that make sure he's not looking bad and wear the right clothes and, you know, what we've always pretended this is. I don't know. Yeah. That's the real truth. And everyone knows the truth, but the real truth. And who wouldn't call?

Starting point is 03:11:14 And they found out through leaks and sleaze bags, a lot of sleaze bags, leakers, leakers should be put in. Yeah, now he just drifts off into his own little train of nonsensical thought. But that's how stupid this is. Like, that's where we are with this, as Patrick Kennington makes fun of him. The whole taco, Trump always chickens out. Even with that acronym, he clearly continues to do it. Now, the U.S., as Reuters reports on the 4th, has used, quote,

Starting point is 03:11:41 virtually all of its long-range precision missiles during Iran war. Inside sources say, of course, then Trump comes out and says, how dare you leak that information? It's false. Well, then why would you care? You know, like Trump warns the U.S. has massive amounts of munitions and vows to hunt down leakers after. Okay, I guess we'll find out. Now, what happens when we inevitably find out that he absolutely did run out

Starting point is 03:12:04 and he's lying about that now? Well, the people that support him will go, it was about a war thing and the narrative. The truth is he does that about the most inaneation. stupid things. The reflecting pool and they cut it with a thousand yard foot with a sword as long as my house. You know, at the end of the day, nope, they lied and he knows it. We know it. Everyone moves on. It's just the stupidest. It's almost, why would he lie about that? I mean, even lie once, maybe double down and keep lying about it. It's something about who he is. Pentagon draws up new

Starting point is 03:12:38 nuclear weapon strategy for war with Russia and China. that's interesting, the telegraph, policy shift to prioritize shorter range tactical equipment. I've been telling you for a long time, Donald Trump has been normalizing the tactical nuclear direction. Do you think it's about Russia and China? Maybe. But either way. That could just be kind of a head fake to get Iran thinking they're going to do that. Who knows?

Starting point is 03:13:03 But to finish up in general, Sam Hussein highlights this, says what this is probably a major motivating, motivating, motivating, motivating, motivating, devotion for the attacks on Iran, keeping eyes off Gaza. Israel wipes genocide evidence in Gaza, carting off rubble and remains in hundreds of trucks daily. You know why? Because if allowed people to go through that rubble, they would find nothing but dead bodies of women and children. And so they're quietly digging it out and moving it somewhere else. Well, everyone's looking somewhere else. That's happening right now in Israel, in Gaza, in occupied Palestine. Well, Susan Abdullah points out, greater percentage of children killed in Gaza than in Europe's Holocaust. That's a hell of a stat.

Starting point is 03:13:46 Look into it for yourself. The scale of Israel's child killing in Gaza is historically extraordinary, indefensible. The Holocaust was 25%, 30 plus. And guys, that's not the, it's more than that. That's what we can prove. But yeah, keep going on, keep telling us why these are the ones fighting the evil in the world. Now, drop site news also includes this. Israeli army chief says in a statement on Thursday that the Israeli military would continue

Starting point is 03:14:14 proactive operations in Gaza during the supposed ceasefire. So they're allowed to keep military operations and bombings and killings and rape and torture. But it's all because, but Hamas. But wait a minute, the actual ceasefire literally says you're at ceasefire with Hamas. But Hamas, though, I mean, that's not even a joke. Peterman just went on John Stewart's show and asked point blank about when he said, said it's not a genocide and they've killed and he said well they've killed 1200 Palestinians just since the ceasefire and Federman says well yes because they need to be taken out Palestinians I mean what

Starting point is 03:14:46 he makes it about Hamas but you're talking about innocent Palestine we're not talking about Hamas we're talking about Palestinians who have been bombed and even if it was you're still talking about a ceasefire with that group and now you're okay bombing them during a ceasefire because well they're the group we're fighting you guys are all very obvious about it if you're a Zionist apparently doesn't matter what you do. But the other side can't do anything. I mean, who's missing this right now? It's obvious. Now, the Board of Peace has issued its first construction contract in Gaza to build a rudimentary 150-person military outpost to get this, guys, house Moroccan troops. It's almost like everything fits together. There's more to the story. Now, it's not like it's all interconnected in that

Starting point is 03:15:32 way, but just think about how the point is that whatever happened over there was clearly involving the Israeli agenda, the U.S. agenda, and it just so happens that you have Moroccan troops who are building out the first outpost in the occupied Gaza technocratic health game. The contract, which has not yet been finalized, was awarded to Arkel International. You know that company. You know why? Because that's the company that worked to bring in the death, you know, the Gaza Health Humanitarian Foundation. By the way, it's a fake U.S. company that's obviously in Israeli cut out.

Starting point is 03:16:06 Arkell International, a contractor for the U.S. government and militaries worldwide is transporting aid to Gaza for the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation. You know, the one run by that ISIS guy that Israel supported to make the ISIS militia. Here it is right here. For those who don't remember, Harat's article, what's wrong with that? How Israel Trained and Armed ISIS-linked Gaza and Militia. That's for the humanitarian foundation. That's what it was. They called it that.

Starting point is 03:16:40 So this group, it says Arkel International LLC, a veteran U.S. construction and logistics firm that operates as a subcontractor for this Gaza humanitarian humanitarian foundation. No big deal. Arco International is responsible for the logistics side of the aid distribution operations, you know, the ones that were basically a choke point for murder. According to the company's incorporation papers in Israel, it authorized, it's authorized representative in the country is Heasel Basaliel, an Israeli businessman who previously brokered defense deals in Africa. It's just normal stuff. It says the company registered in Israel as a foreign Corporation on May 13, 2025. A week before the GHF aid distribution centers began operations

Starting point is 03:17:20 in Gaza Strip and a day before safe reach solutions registered in Israel. At least one of Arkel's executives has been living in Israel since 2024. At least a month before the company was formally registered in Israel, discussions were already underway regarding its establishment. As previously reported by Heretz, the Gaza aid operation was initiated by officers of the IDF, without the knowledge of broader defense establishment and was coordinated by the prime minister's office. According to a source familiar with the project, Arkel was expected initially to contract the distribution sites inside Gaza

Starting point is 03:17:54 to construct, excuse me. But in the end, the task was carried out by the IDF. Well, explain for me why a group that is involved with the, like why were they building construction site? Because that was what they were going to build it out. This is a cutout, guys. That's what this is. The Arkel's incorporation papers in,

Starting point is 03:18:11 Israel, Hazil Basileil, a businessman who founded a cellular provider in Israel, broker defense deals in Africa, and serves as Rwanda's honorary consul in Israel. It's crazy. It listed as the company's representative in Israel. The company has given him power of attorney to manage its business in Israel. It's open and manage a bank account for the company, appoint lawyers and accountants for the company, and to receive legal documentation for the company's name. But it's based out of Louisiana, trust me.

Starting point is 03:18:39 According to an informed source, Bezalil even got approval from the defense ministry before the company was opened in Israel. Currently, the company's main activity is transporting goods from the loading point at Kareem Shalom to the distribution centers. Now, this was back then, right? This was revealed, even by Army veterans that came back to the U.S. and testified to this that these people were murdering Palestinians. Not necessarily the ones bringing the truck, but the dynamic involved was absolutely a, choke point for execution. The trucks used by Arkel used to belong to the Israeli logistics company, Millennium. No big deal.

Starting point is 03:19:16 Photographs obtained by Heretz from the vicinity of Karim Shalom show the company's name crudely erased with paint. According to Arquil, the trucks were sold to them by millennium. Bottom line, guys. Oh, there's one point here. Heretz has reported widespread chaos at distribution sites where hundreds of Palestinians have been killed by their way to receive the food brought by Arkel International. So back to the point, the first company to build this is Arkel International.

Starting point is 03:19:43 And they're bringing in Moroccan troops. You know, it's almost like it all just kind of falls in place, right? Like this is all somehow interconnected. Lastly, oh, wait, make sure I didn't miss that. Oh, yeah, we got that. Okay. Lastly, this is Zachary Foster. Meet Yajav Lichner.

Starting point is 03:20:02 He's Israeli. He's the director of the Washington, D.C. office at UNICEF, United Nations Children's Fund. He spies on the United Nations on behalf of apartheid Israel forward confidential UN reports to apartheid Israel diplomats. And they know this because drop site news did a breakdown on this for your eyes only Israel's mole inside the United Nations. Now, it's well worth your read and it's very clear. To end, the point is simply that you not only, so talking about the UN dynamic and the investigations or even the, you know, I mean, everything we've talked about. and including the collaboration with the United Nations in regard to the Gaza Board of B, all of it is that you have to recognize that the people like this are on the inside of these very

Starting point is 03:20:47 institutions that are allegedly supposed to hold them accountable. And that's why this is where, that's why this is going the way it's going. The point obviously today, guys, is about trying to do something about this, right? Like, we see it, all of this. So we covered a lot of topics today, but it's important. to do your best to bring this to the attention of people who otherwise don't know about it. Whether they have the influence to stop it or change it or not. Definitely, if you can, but anybody, everybody, because one more person seeing this talking about it, sharing it can and very well

Starting point is 03:21:21 make the difference. So help us. I'll leave it there for today. Thank you for tuning in. I appreciate you all. I think one thing, guys, before I leave today, you know, I mean, I've expressed this so many times, you know, that just we're in a very important time where this stuff is so, you know, I mean, I've been doing this long enough to note it to feel sort of the fever pitch, not just from narratives. And it's weird. It's a difference, right? There's difference between the screaming idiots online that will yell about things that aren't even happening and then like the fever pitch, which is not even the same. I shouldn't even use the word fever pitch, but just like the kind of like the hype of where we are with the agenda, what's actually

Starting point is 03:22:00 happening. And I personally feel like we're at a time where I've never seen it as obvious, as forced, and as honestly, as vulnerable. And I think that's just important. I think it's important to capitalize on it. So I just want to stress it again on the way out today. If you ever had a time where you felt like you could make a difference is now, I really believe that. And even though it may feel the opposite,

Starting point is 03:22:22 and there's a reason for that because the system does not want you to recognize an opportunity. That'd be the way I see that. Either way, the information is here for you because it's better to be informed. I'll tell you that right now. Thank you for tuning in. I love you all, as always. Question everything. Come to your own conclusions. Stay vigilant.

The Last American Vagabond - FDA Approves mRNA Flu Shot, Fauci Contempt Political Theater & The "Bacteriophage System" GoF

There aren't comments yet for this episode. Click on any sentence in the transcript to leave a comment.