The Last American Vagabond - Flock, Axon, Vigilant Solutions: The Real Psyop Is Dividing Us into Allowing Any of Them

Starting point is 00:00:00 I've seen a few posts about this and I wanted to comment on it because I have a personal experience with it. It isn't something that's happening in the future. It's something that's happening now. I rented a car in Europe and as the woman handed me the car keys, she said, this is a brand new car and she was like super excited about it. She was like, it's 2026 and I was like awesome. No one's had a chance to like fart or smoke in it. This will be great. And I driven up for a day or two and I was getting on a highway. It was a six lane highway. And all of a sudden, the gas stopped working. And I'm pressing on the gas. I can't get the car to go.

Starting point is 00:00:36 So the car is dinging. It's making all this noise. And I can't figure out what's going on. And I look at the dashboard. And in English, it says, sit up straight. We can't find your eyes. It starts with a simple question and ends an objective reality. Through our journey from there to hear, we find one another.

Starting point is 00:01:10 and ourselves. And as the next 24 hours breaks free from our last, we gaze onward in reflection of the day. Welcome to the daily wrap-up. But I'm going to go ahead and guarantee that I'm going to have some kind of an issue with this, with this show. I hope not. Let me know in the chat if you guys can hear this.

Starting point is 00:02:00 I don't know if you've been seeing what's been going on with me, and maybe it's only on my computer, maybe it's Dreamyard, I'm not sure. I have to have two different browsers up with two different windows so I can even add videos because one won't let me and one won't let the audio work and nobody seems to be able to figure this out. I'm not muted, so this is,

Starting point is 00:02:19 looks like it's not working. Let me know if you guys can hear me. Yeah, so there's definitely something wrong. Let me know for the first couple minutes here, if this is even consistently coming across, because we might have to call the show today if this isn't working. Okay. You guys are telling me it's working okay.

Starting point is 00:02:38 All right. So right now, it's everything is freezing. I can't hear the videos. I'm going to try to work my way through this. Worst case scenario. I might just pull the video back and jump on the other one, but I'm hoping the audio will work. I was hoping not to even have to get into any of this,

Starting point is 00:02:52 but it looks like you guys are hearing me pretty well. So we're going to get into it to start. But it's an interesting show for this to happen to around specifically the conversation of lock cameras and surveillance and where all this goes. Now, we talked about it yesterday, and please, again, for those that are regular viewers, let me know the moment you see something or hear something wrong so I can try to address it. Otherwise, I'm just going to get into the show here.

Starting point is 00:03:13 It is choppy for you guys. Let me know. I'll try to work with this best I can. Yesterday, we talked about ice and really just the kind of police state that is growing in this country, the obvious reality of it. And we were going to go more in the depth yesterday in the kind of overlap with the technology and just decided to leave it there yesterday. So today we wanted to make sure we come back and talk about specifically the flock axon,

Starting point is 00:03:39 vigilance solutions, license plate reader conversation, because this is an important one. And I'm hoping this doesn't have to be too long today because the important part of this is that like we talked about really early in this, we should be concerned about whether or not there is an issue here. About whether or not there, let me just do this real quick. So I just click that button. It's probably going to take 10 seconds for this to even come up. That's part of this problem as I'm waiting for this. this window to come up that I've already pressed the button for. It's just, you know, I've

Starting point is 00:04:08 like a 30 second delay for stuff like this to happen as I've been waiting for there we go. For at least for me, it just came up. In fact, let me know if that was up the whole time I was talking. That would actually help me understand what's happening. But I'm going to take my video back and hopefully that might help something. I don't think it will because frankly I think this is something beyond just normal stuff, my opinion. In any case, we're going to start with this. ignore the thing on the screen for a minute. What I want to get into in particular was the, what, as I was discussing yesterday with the idea of ICE

Starting point is 00:04:41 and the kind of, you know, police state and the overlap of the technology, we talked about the idea of the potential psychological operation, you know, the head fake around axon, uh, flock cameras and, and whether or not that was something we should be concerned about. And as we discussed early, of course we should. No matter how it ends up being like,

Starting point is 00:05:00 even if it's something that isn't even really happening, remember, this is based on something, something we actually care about, even if we were tricked into focusing on it, unconstitutional surveillance and in plenty of other things they're doing. But so my point would be, we should wonder whether or not they wanted us to do that. Like for a hypothetically point that we'll get into, maybe the Trump administration wanted Axon to be the successful one, so they wanted us to focus on flock. That's a fair point. I don't think that's what's happening. I'll go into that, but we should ask those questions, right? Now, as we keep this, you know, as over the last week,

Starting point is 00:05:29 let's say, this is really developed into kind of just the buzz. Like, there's some of us that have been really covering this and getting in depth. And usually what happens when these things catch fire is you get the usual kind of, you know, jackals around the outside of all this that end up just making these little, you know, half of them go viral for half information or partisan views. And, you know, and none of it really gives you, you know, it's just a, it's a jumping on the bandwagon kind of thing. And that's what makes us feel even more skeptical. So what I want to cover today is the fact that, like I said to begin, regardless, this is, you know, I mean, I'll just say it right now, as I said yesterday. I think this is an organic thing. Of course, every organic thing that is a danger to

Starting point is 00:06:05 the establishment will be attempted to be co-opted, which is what I think is happening here. But I really do believe this. I mean, one, because again, we actually care about unconstitutional surveillance. That's everywhere. So I think what's happening is that effort to get us to ignore it. Now, maybe Axon was the play, but I want to go into what's actually the reality of those numbers right now. I briefly pointed at the end of the show yesterday because it's not the way people are making it seem. I was one of the earlier ones to cover the idea that Axon was sort of the bait and switch where we had 53 different counties that it all switched over to axon some of them quietly 80 something counties last i checked were removing flock and there's more than that sense but that's a

Starting point is 00:06:40 small fraction and i'm going to go into that today and i want to think i want us to think about what that means and really what my gut is telling me whether axon flock vigilant solutions and plenty of others there's multiple other companies all on the smaller like lower end of the you know of the spectrum but that i feel this is about trying to divide us to trick us to fool us into somehow either a or ignoring the problem. That's what I think the real sciop here is, is they're trying to get us to fight each other and ignore things, even if it's real,

Starting point is 00:07:07 even if they got us to look at it for some kind of second layer manipulation, so we end up ignoring, you know, the real point is I keep highlighting, missing the forest for the trees. Instead of focusing on the objective crime in front of us, we dive further into the hypothetical, which we should ask.

Starting point is 00:07:23 You know, Le Hina, the bigger conspiracy theories, the idea of direct energy weapons, all these different things that are important and interesting. But guess what happened? never got held accountable for the real and obvious land grabs and crimes or East Palestine or any number of stories where the partisan game completely bastardized the story and broke it down into multiple, you know, 17 different theories, which again, I always support the idea of thinking and considering, but that buried the actual, the crimes that were committed. I mean, like I make,

Starting point is 00:07:53 even on East Palestine, you realize that company, Norfolk Southern is, again, how many times they're bigger, stronger, more successful. Nothing happened to them. They gained from that situation outside of the problems that it caused and the headaches. So this is my point. If we would have focused, these people should have been in prison. Instead, partisanship allowed us to focus on the other thing. They shout you down for thinking you're following for the small story.

Starting point is 00:08:16 Trust your gut. You know what's right and wrong. You understand what's going on. That's why you're here, whether this show or any other that's actually talking about the objective, nonpartisan bigger picture. So that's what I want to get into today. Now, I want to talk about a few things to start, as you're seeing here, a part of this sort of like propaganda side of things. I want to talk about that to get into this.

Starting point is 00:08:36 I want to overlap quickly the part about ICE that we discussed and a couple of extra points I want to add to kind of reset that table in your mind. Again, just quick update in the chat. Let me know everything's going. Okay. I'm super worried about this freaking out today just because I feel like this has been acting super crazy, but I'm not seeing any issues. So after the ice part, we're going to get into predominantly just the idea of flock and axon and all. all the rest and where I think that goes and some deeper points that you're really not going to see on the Twitter encapsulation of this bigger story, which again, as I recently said, I think it's

Starting point is 00:09:08 important to consider, actually, let me do this too well, as I'm talking, I shouldn't even said that, but let me, there we go, sorry, now I got lost my trigger to thought. I wanted to shrink the window so it doesn't look so weird, because I'm weird like that, neurotic, there we go. there we go but important to think about that there is a new category see it's it's see i can't even get it right because the thing is taking so long to adjust anyway let it go ryan so on twitter on social media there's a new category of kind of you know of creator content you know the people that like i said yesterday i think will kind of encapsulate larger stories for kind of viral twitter sensation and and there's a valid uh

Starting point is 00:09:51 role to play there, right? And some people tend to do it in dishonest ways where they kind of grab other people's content. That's not the point I'm making, but just to recognize that there are people who do a really good job about grabbing something and know the template to make things go viral. And some of them do honest work, by the way, not just all the gross maimus dream alternative media, but what I'm highlighting is that recognize that most of those things are, you know, and the good ones will make sure you know that and give you a link to something deeper are surface level. You know, the talking points going around. Make sure if you care enough that you die, dive into these things in depth and go through it because we're going to get into the deeper parts

Starting point is 00:10:29 of this story. Now, back to the starting point is the two-party illusion stuff that I think is relevant to all of this and a couple quick other points that I want to include. Now, first, Ian Smith here simply says, gosh, I hate those foreign ops because Jack Posobic posted the amount of people who got paid to attack Trump's peace deal with Iran is astounding. We are only just now scratching the surface of these foreign ops. Remember, that came from the idea, largely Israel stemmed propaganda about Iranian foreign ops, while everyone's going, but Israel, or any number of other things, making it about something they could use, right?

Starting point is 00:11:01 So in this case, okay, double second. He's highlighting the case of these people that are out there holding those binders, most transparent administration in history for the Epstein file. Every one of them, D.C. Drano, Cheney, Lips of TikTok, all of them. What's his name? They're in there holding it up, and then they drop the story the moment they were told to. fakes, they are frauds, they are manipulators. That's not even questionable, guys. And everyone seems to see that, but the people in the circle that pretend they're not. And this is what I'm

Starting point is 00:11:31 highlighting. And I want to start again with the point that you probably are frustrated by the fact that, but I do think it's important. Who knows? Maybe it'll be the last time. But I do think that it's important to see this as it goes forward. Again, the idea that this guy, this right here, what you're looking at represents the fake MAGA. That's what that is, whether they know that or not. They're the people that don't actually care about what was promised. Now, I want to make a quick point about something that really kind of even elucidated this further for me in my engagement in talking about this online. Oh, actually, this isn't even relevant. I'm kind of in the other point right now, but I said, I'll play it because it's funny. Somebody was yelling pedophile protector at Trump

Starting point is 00:12:07 while he was in the crowd. It relates to the Epstein point. That's why I was going to include it. But the point was just, again, I guess it's relevant to the MAGA stuff because what's interesting to me is that you have a crowd of people who are there that really do support Trump. But realize, even they understand what's going on, guys, even they know the Epstein. files and most of them kind of wanted that but I've just decided for any number of reasons to support him. That's my, there is a category of that. But what's crazy is that as this guy yells this, many of them just kind of look around. You don't see someone go, hey, screw that guy, get him out of here. And Trump calls him a communist, a communist, because that's so relevant, doesn't it? Because they must be

Starting point is 00:12:40 a Democrat. No, because tons of Republicans care. But this is the lazy reality. And so the people that choose to ignore how dumb that is and support him anyway is what I would call fake MAGA. People that care about what he originally promised are people that actually believe in that original idea. Now, that doesn't mean they're mad. Maybe you think the entire thing was just a movement. The government started. And so therefore, these people are no longer anything but people that see Trump for what he is. What I'm trying to highlight, though, is that whatever you think the real movement was still exist in my mind.

Starting point is 00:13:07 It's all these people that cared about what he promised and never got it and enlarge and seemingly in unison have turned on him. That's just not being allowed to be seen like the flock point I'm going to make today. Before we get further into that, here's just this clip. I hope this plays. Now, all of that is changing because I placed historic tariffs on foreign producers and manufacturers, including a 25% tariff on foreign automobile, something that no other president had the courage to ever do. He's a communist. He's a communist.

Starting point is 00:13:57 All right. Well, let me know if you heard that. God, this is so incredibly frustrating. all I heard was the last few seconds of it. So let me know if you heard the whole video, please, in the chat. Because if you don't, if you didn't, then I don't even know how I'm going to get through the rest of the content I have that I want to share with you. I'll talk through it, but I've got tons of important video content that I want you to see.

Starting point is 00:14:29 You did? All right. Well, let's keep going. I guess I won't be able to comment in as much as I would like. Some of you will love that since I won't stop the video. But frustrating. Just have to stress guys as much as I really, I always comment on it. But I want, you know, this deserves like a deep understanding of how long this has been going on to mean personally, but this platform, just the thousands. And it's not unique.

Starting point is 00:14:49 There's tons of people that have been dealing with this long before I was doing this. I remember them. Go, my computer stopped working. I'm dumb. You know, who knows? And you should question whether this is being done to me or just somehow I'm screwing something up back here. You should ask that. But I'm just telling you guys, it's just unparalleled. I don't know anybody else, anybody, even the people on, you know, anybody anywhere, even Alex Jones that deals with this constant, this. many platforms. Do your best to compare it. People love to call them no censored. And that's not some some kind of competition. I would love to not have to deal with this stuff. But I just think it's crazy how consistent this is. Anyway, I digress. I got it off my chest. Now, point is, clearly, it's an interesting dynamic happening at this rally. And it's clear that he, he didn't like it as he tries to talk over it really loudly. And it's clear that he was

Starting point is 00:15:37 uncomfortable. And then, of course, communist because, well, I guess that would work. And you know, did it sound like everybody even supported that? I don't know. That's how you, you can decide. My gut tells me that that's not what's happening. So on that point, Adam comes out and says,

Starting point is 00:15:52 this is the account Adam, says, did anyone notice that MAGA on the July 24th? Maga stopped caring about the Epstein files as soon as they found out Trump was in them. Now, is that what you all think? Do you think that ever, that's not what I saw? In fact, I saw tons of people in this,

Starting point is 00:16:06 in the conservative side of the conversation who were like, and still to this very moment, We're screaming about that. Many of them, that was a line for them. Much more Iran for some of them, but the point was they said, wait a minute, we want that. Right. And so in your mind right then, if they decided to ignore what he promised and support him anyway, I would call those people not real anything.

Starting point is 00:16:24 They're blind followers. You have people that actually believe in the movement. You can decide what to call what. And this is what it comes down to, sort of a perception difference, right? Because I'm going to make this point next. And this really did kind of open my mind to a difference on this. But so what I said again is I said, not MAGA, the ones always pretending to, be MAGA. And I say this is one who doesn't support either side or government in general.

Starting point is 00:16:45 It seems to me the majority of conservatives, I'm telling you. I know you guys are starting to see this, have come to see Trump for what he is. At least maybe you don't think it's the majority, but we all see this growing number. His numbers diminishing people. I mean, it's pretty damn obvious. In my opinion, the system actually wants us to continue seeing it this way. And that's why I keep bringing this up. Because I really do think there's a game here. I think the effort is to get us to think that every Trump supporter, or less rather just every Republican is one way and every day. Democrat is one way when I think the point of why that's so aggressive is because neither side captures that majority. They're losing influence in everything, foreign policy influence on us.

Starting point is 00:17:20 This is falling apart. And we all sense that. And so for us to fall into especially those of us that actually see this, people in the media fear that feel that have been calling this. They're the ones in my experience right now that are falling for this more than anybody, at least as I see it. I guess the way I would frame it is I care about this because it's like I see people that I really care about that I feel should that would you know that aren't calling this for what it is and I want people to see that that because I don't feel they have negative intentions I just don't think they're seeing it and again I could certainly be wrong this is what I thought was interesting here oh next one actually this one another one this Kim Iverson said you know Republicans had a moment

Starting point is 00:17:57 of being cool and I had hope but that has gone to S-H-I-T real quick which is a weird statement I guess because Republicans at a moment of being cool you know there are all just people guys and they're not just one nebulous idea. Neither are Democrats. So that plays into the two-party illusion aggressively what I don't agree with. And I've told her that before. Sam Tripoli says, please tell me you understand that both parties are garbage and voting for the Democrats won't change anything. Now, I'll also point out that she's, I've seen her do plenty of posts like this, where her intention is, and I've done the same to make people think a certain thing, not that she actually believes exactly what you're saying. I can't say, you can decide for yourself.

Starting point is 00:18:31 I get the sense that she really is kind of saying, well, they look like they were going good. Now they're going down, which can't be taken in most people's minds for any. anything other than support of the other side. Not always the way you should look at that, but he asked the same question, like recognize they're both bad, right? Which I like Sam for that reason. We aren't voting our way out of this. He says, everything you hate about the country you live in was either brought by Republicans or Democrats. They are two wings of the same corrupt decaying bird. He's right. And I said, I also think it's worth noting, at least in my opinion, the Republicans, she's pointing out of the ones playing teams for politics, right? The ones that were like,

Starting point is 00:19:02 we like freedom and democracy and then when whatever Trump says, they didn't believe in it at the first place. So whatever you thought was cool were people that were pretending. But there were people in the conservative movement that believed those things, and they still do. So why would we point to the ones who lie instead of all the ones that are currently fleeing from Trump that still believe what she thought was cool? You see, it's like a choice to see it a certain way. And I said as well, and they don't really care if they get what they were promised. I think the majority of conservatives are not in the category of those who blindly support, at least in this moment, right? Now, this is what I thought was interesting. Godfrey says, when I tell you that Maga is stone dead,

Starting point is 00:19:39 and what I believe since his comment down here is that he means the Trump support, that's how I take this. I wasn't sure when he first posted it. He said, it's not because that is what I believe or because of my feelings. That's what you get. You know, you hate Trump, right? And he says it's because of the numbers. And I agree with him in that regard in regard to the support for Trump. The math reveals yet again that the spell of MAGA has been shattered. Now, if you mean the spell, which means they support Trump in that group, that I don't. I agree with that. And he says 33% of MAGA base has peeled off according to the pollster. Now, I think it's more than that.

Starting point is 00:20:11 And I think he said something similar that he, yeah, he says down here actually. But I said, what if the ones that peeled off, what appears to be the majority, I argue, are the genuine MAGA movement. Just thought experiment. Have, you know, do it for help me, help me, you know, reach people in the thought, at least consider it, right? The ones who actually wanted to make America great again, right? not the ones who pretended to and went with whatever Trump said, but were played by him, right?

Starting point is 00:20:36 But now call it out. Why would the hangers on be the real movement? Okay, I'll leave it there. Guys, I'll read his comment. But I know some of these things can be redundant because it's something we go through repeatedly. And I always aim it to people who are new to this, not the ones that are always here, which, you know, that's just the way I do this. And some people get irritated by the redundancy sometimes.

Starting point is 00:20:57 But I'd like to believe we're all here for that moment, for the reaching people, right? right? And he says, yes, that is exactly what is happening. He agrees with that. And he says, I think that 33% number is lower. So we agree on the, he said it's probably more 60%. The only remaining MAGA at this point are people under full mind control of some kind in American Zionist Jews. And I believe he put in quotes because he's talking about the people supporting Trump. He says, real MAGA in capitals left a while ago. So we agree. And he says most of us leaving when Trump asked so he sees himself in that category is why is everybody still talking about Epstein, right? That was the statement he said that threw him off the Trump.

Starting point is 00:21:32 Trump train. And so I just think that's crazy. So it's even this person who you believed in the lies, but then when he saw that he was being lied to, had the integrity enough to go, okay, I'm not supporting him anymore. What do you mean? What about Epstein? Clearly we care about that, right? But yet even he sees himself as part of a dead movement, which I just find fascinating, right? Because why wouldn't you go, but we still believe those things. We are still MAGA. But I get it because that represents Trump in people's minds. So I hope that like elucidates that more for people because that is what I'm trying to highlight, guys. All this really means is most Americans in this group or that group are on your side,

Starting point is 00:22:09 whoever's out there watching. And you may not believe that. I believe that. I think the evidence backs it up. I think we're an important moment where people are starting to recognize, as I've said, my entire career, you've got far more in common with the person on the other side of the line than you do have ever had with anybody on any side of your government. And so here is, oh, just another kind of point.

Starting point is 00:22:32 Evan Kilgore says, Maga sucks now. Same point, right? Depending on how you aim, you could make that an accurate statement or I would argue, you see what I'm saying? And so it really depends on what you think MAGA was. Will it Trump's name for what his group was or was it a group of people that wanted those ideas? I think it's obvious.

Starting point is 00:22:48 It's the last matter, right? It's just about the way it's framed. And I think the first framing helps the system. Now, a couple of opening points. This has been going around. Canoa the Great, Fauci's diary says he's privately put COVID's fatality rate. Bottom line is Fauci's diary. stuff has been going around. The guy's a war criminal. I hope he goes to jail. I bet he does not.

Starting point is 00:23:08 The point is all the stuff you can find is really if you follow this, if you follow on our platform or anybody doing good work during COVID, you know about almost everything in the supposed diary breakout. The point is that it's past, right? First of all, he got a pardon from before, even though I don't, I doubt, I don't see how that could even hold up for, you know, but then on top of that, Trump as well, let it go. Statue limitations, any number of things, guys, on top of the fact that Trump is completely complicit. In every. everything they might go after him for. Why would he open that door? So here, this, I believe, is about going, look, look, look, look, and stop paying attention to. So I would argue the Cano

Starting point is 00:23:42 the great types are still in support Trump. You can ask yourself whether you think Luke is. He's calling him out recently and acting like the confused person going, how did what's going on right now? Oh, did he lie to us? Yes, yes, yes, he lied. Back when we were trying to tell you that before. He says the administration does have a way to put him in jail and the people here are demanding justice. We desperately need to prevent this happening all over again. Oh, so you do have hope the Trump will do the right thing. Amazing how that's still possible. Or at least that's what you want people to think. They do have a way to put them in jail. Well, they could do whatever they want. But technically, legally speaking, they've already chosen to avoid and omit and ignore and rather

Starting point is 00:24:16 just put behind them any actual way to do that. Desperately prevent this happening again. Really? It's happening right now. In fact, you just posted under Trump's other posts about, or rather it was somebody else's about Trump saying he just funded Pfizer. So why would it be calling on them to go after him if they're doing the same thing? Well, you see, this is how the game of the mainstream alternative media works to get you you know what I mean, and you know where this goes. Stop falling for this. Toby Rogers, by the way, on the note of the vaccine side, had a really great post.

Starting point is 00:24:49 This is Joe Rogan podcast news, whatever account posting it. Toby Rogers has sat in front of Congress and laid out the reality of the vaccine problem, not just COVID vaccines. What I want you to really realize here is that this is, he's talking about the government, and he mentioned the positive note about RFK, but realize everything he's talking about right here, this administration is still doing, including now, as I pointed out recently, reinitiating for new recruits, the flu vaccine mandate, which is included in what he's discussing here.

Starting point is 00:25:17 We're making new COVID shots for children, for adults, spending more money as Jeffrey Tucker showed me and I saw undwined and I shared. So where's the real problem here, guys? I mean, why would be, you know, my point is this stuff ends up being used to sort of act like this is still somehow Trump's agenda. Like, Maha, an R.K. Jr. and Toby Rogers, well, they don't support any of this right now. And you know I've proven that. But I wanted to play this. He talks about, what is it, epistemetic? What is it? Epistemic capture, which is interesting. I hadn't heard that before. Somebody's saying no sound. Let me know if that's the case.

Starting point is 00:25:52 And it's talking about how these industries capture, like the knowledge base, which is exactly where we are. It's a great clip. He's very well spoken in this. Hope you can hear it. That we are in the midst of one of the greatest crimes in human history. We have a product being injected into children 70 plus times over the course of their development that's never been tested against a proper saline placebo. Over that course of that time period, chronic illness in this kind of, has gone from 10% of children having one or more chronic conditions to now more than 50%

Starting point is 00:26:37 of children having one or more chronic conditions. Secretary Kennedy in the hearing that was last week said the latest data from the CDC says that 76% of Americans now have one or more chronic conditions. And I believe that lots of these chronic conditions stem from iotogenic injury. We have 3 million children with autism back in 1970 the rate was so low that it was essentially zero I'm outraged by that and I think every person in this room should be outraged by that I don't I don't know how to say it anymore clearly that we need to change course in this country

Starting point is 00:27:18 and I'm terribly disappointed by the medical profession in the social sciences there's this term called epistemic capture which is when the entire knowledge production process becomes captured by one industry and that's what's happened with science and medicine and so i think we need to change course and i think the people who have covered up the autism epidemic and the epidemics of iotogenic injury should be held to account for their actions i think that's over i can't tell okay great clip sorry if it cuts short i think it's over Yeah. You know, I mean, it's an important conversation, right?

Starting point is 00:28:08 But the entire thing, like not just the idea, which I find to be the most important, the idea, because it goes well beyond vaccines, the idea that these industries are like the industry's pointing to has captured the, like the production of knowledge, if you can call it that, you know, like the industry through, and that's, you know, this is like going back to the Flexner report and the Rockefellers and the medical industry and how they captured the school. I mean, this is exactly what he's talking about, guys. Look, we didn't, we've done entire shows on that.

Starting point is 00:28:34 Look up the Flexner Report. Look up the, I'm blankening the term. Anyway, you know, it's very clear that this is something that has been done for the profit, for control, not for safety, not for you. So as he says in the post, Senator Blumenthal was like, how dare you call Nuremberg two trials? And I was like, well, actually, you know, the bottom line is we need to have a massive change here. And this is the current administration. I think we should, I think we know that, right? It's just, or it's rather the U.S. government.

Starting point is 00:29:07 Because if you believe they were going to do something different, well, you were wrong. Pentagon restores mandatory flu shots for all recruits amid boot camp outbreak. So if they can do it for, you know, because, oh, that's a thing. Well, then why wouldn't that justify, oh, there's a new outbreak for COVID or whatever they say next? It's the same exact thing. All this is doing is showing you that they have their own justifications. There's also this conversation, which I found a little interesting. I'm the resurgence of the flu mandate for new recruits.

Starting point is 00:29:32 RFK Jr. bets $500 million on universal vaccines in shift from COVID-19 funding, which, by the way, don't forget, still continued. They still have the commercial shot. They still have the self-amplifying shots for two different groups, and plenty more than I haven't even gone into yet. May 1st, 2025. The point is, when they shifted away, they claimed from COVID, but actually didn't and lied about that,

Starting point is 00:29:51 they shifted $500 million because it was the most public COVID contract. They wanted you to think they did. Remember, they made a whole thing about it, and then ultimately funded COVID shots anyway. They shifted it into universal flu vaccine directions, which has been Fauci's wet dream. He's had so many conversations about that over the years. So maybe that was the plan. This happened before. They suddenly shifted back.

Starting point is 00:30:11 Who knows? Just include the point is recognize that they are on the same agenda. And don't forget, we just talked about the new kind of phange bacteria system discussion. And that's really kind of an adaptation of the gain of function to raise. The same conversation, using viruses to infect bacteria. to cause certain change. It's terrifying. Look it up.

Starting point is 00:30:30 And that's my opinion. I mean, I'm sure somebody out there thinks I'm wrong, but I'll stand by my logic of the evidence in peer-reviewed science that we read, and I think it shows you experimentation. And my point is before the peer-reviewed science,

Starting point is 00:30:41 there's plenty of studies that have told us that exact direction can be just as dangerous. So it's all just another head fake, guys. So I include the conversations about them using self-amplifying shots with both community. The new shot is out there, but there's amplification. Amplitude therapeutics.

Starting point is 00:31:00 And I forget the other name of the other one, but they're all included here. Both of which are continuing with self-amplifying MRNA shots under this administration. And they just funded again, as you saw, two more contracts for adult and child COVID-19 vaccines. And just if you want to see just a perfect example of, like a perfect metaphor for what this administration is in particular, this person posts, or technically, they deleted it. so I shouldn't, it doesn't even worth bringing it up, which is hilarious to me that the White House or the State Department is deleting their own post because they're embarrassing themselves

Starting point is 00:31:35 because it said, winning, right? Super cool, whatever that's supposed to mean. And then they literally posted, it's not an option. It's like, I don't even understand what they probably meant like it's not an option to not win or whatever their mindset was. And then they deleted the post because somebody said winning is not an option. It's almost like they tried to embarrass themselves. Or they're like, you know, subconsciously posting what's actually the truth.

Starting point is 00:32:05 I don't know. That's just pretty sad. But it's exactly what I agree. I think that's where they are. So let's get into the point about specifically axon, flock, bait, and switch, including the bigger picture of what's all happening. But briefly to reset the table with the ice conversation for those that didn't see this show. And man, I recommend you do.

Starting point is 00:32:23 Like, for those that follow this, you know, like, you know, people at Free Thought Project, for example, that literally part of their main focus is police corrupt. They've been covering this my entire life. But what this shows you is a ragged, like a dramatic increase in general, but in particular with ice and the use and rather the lack of training, almost like the deliberate use of illegal tactics and how that is just mushroomed the entire police field. And I mean, so a thing that was already happening is gone.

Starting point is 00:32:57 rampant, which I mean, I can't stop seeing examples of this. And some of them you'll see, as I posted out in the last show, you could point out in previous year. So it's not new, but it is happening and it is exploding. And it shows you they don't, they don't care about your right. They don't care about what's supposed to guide their actions. And you think that comes from a unilateral decision, guys, it's clearly coming from the top. And that's why it's spinning out of control. And then we'll, and just have only a few examples, then we're going to go right into the point of where the axon-flot camera situation is right now. Now this, or this was the show, this is a post from Blue Lives Matter again.

Starting point is 00:33:32 Now, I found this interesting because even they keep like trying to, you know, caveat, you know, what we do is love cops and support cops, but, but, but, and they keep doing this. And I even looked further back and I didn't see some consistent, you know, basically a count that's supposed to, it's Blue Lives Matter. So the account is pro police. Now I look back, I didn't go super deep, but I was scrolling back and I didn't see that they were doing this way back when. So what it shows me is even this.

Starting point is 00:33:57 police account, as it says, we hate doing this, but at least, but as the largest police news out let in the world, we have a duty to fight for good cops, but also call the bad ones. So all it shows me is that there is such an increase in this that even the police accounts are like, yeah, if they're honest anyway, we have to point to that. And so this is even sort of a benign example compared to what we showed yesterday. This one and the next one, which is even smaller, it's about the, it's about the violation of your rights and kind of in conjunction with the ignorance of your rights, which is so incredible, but the idea that you have these police officers that now create illegal situations. Like, as I showed you three examples of yesterday, police go up to a

Starting point is 00:34:38 car. Oh, yeah, I just, you know, I just want to make sure you were okay. I heard you yell something. And, you know, no, no, you're not being detained. Like, no reason, they even state that they have no legal justification. Then they go, oh, but, you know, step out of the car, I want to ask you a couple questions. And, well, no, you know, am I detained? No, okay. Then no. And they go, well, if you don't step out, it's obstruction. And this is a common thing right now. And guess what, guys, it is not. Now, if the government don't longer cares about your rights, they can do whatever they want.

Starting point is 00:35:06 But that's not what we're being told. And so the reality is that they're telling you this as if that is the law and the right. It's not. They need legal justification, probable cause. We've gone through all of this. So the question is, do they care or are they just ignorant of the law? Or is it both? And so in this case, not only is this woman going after a guy because clearly he irritates her,

Starting point is 00:35:26 and that's what seems to guide most of this. But even the supervisor who is there joins him, or joins her, rather. This is an abuse of power and ignorance of rights, or a situation that's grown too large to stop because this has been allowed by the highest power. And so they are thinking to themselves, well, we already know we can get away with this. You decide which category it's in.

Starting point is 00:35:50 What's this in your back pocket? I just thought you walking it. The navigation awaits. What's the problem? You're a time. Yes, I am actually. What's your name and date of birth? I don't have to give that unless I'm doing. Yes, sir. I was investigating. Do you want me to put you in handcuffs right now? Yes, sir, I do.

Starting point is 00:36:08 What is your suspicion? It looks like you're carrying a gun in your back pocket. I'm stopping to make sure you're carrying it properly. Have you ensured that it's not a firearm? No, you keep turning so I can't see it. You don't have to be a dick to me. Well, you're being one to me. No, sir. I'm doing my job. Am I detained? Yeah, you are. What's your name and date of birth? It doesn't not matter. Yes, sir, it does? Do you have a crime? Would you like me to put you in here? He's right here. All right.

Starting point is 00:36:32 Don't eat them. What's to stop you for? Or a walking stick. They could look like a weapon. She asked you to present it, okay? Now she's asking me for ID. I don't need the idea unless a reasonable articulated suspicion. And I have committed a crime and committed a crime or about to do a crime.

Starting point is 00:36:54 Sir, and her suspicion was that you were armed, okay? she's asking for your ID. Well, now she is verified that I am not on. So there is no problem. You have your ID or not? I do have my ID, but you don't need it. Okay. Okay.

Starting point is 00:37:26 Okay. 777. 77 whiskey micotine. I don't know where's wallet. Where's your wallet? Sir. I don't handle the wallet on me. Okay.

Starting point is 00:37:37 Where's your ID? Where's your ID? Pothin. Which fogg? You are not allowed to search me. Names and badge the numbers. 12-37 on 865, 4-27. Hotel 3-22-457-6-1-254-0.

Starting point is 00:38:35 Just for time and, you know, I don't know, making sure I can't really see where is that. The first part's really the important part. And as you can see in the post, this was October 31st, 2022. So I find it very interesting that this is something even pro-cop accounts are choosing to highlight. Because I think we're in a point where this is obvious, right? But what's important to highlight there, guys, as I said before, this is not something that is new. It has been growing and it's getting worse. The introduction of the way ICE is today and what they've been allowed to do is only spiraling this out.

Starting point is 00:39:06 Please watch yesterday's show. The point in this is to highlight the example there, the idea of, you know, where are you going? What's happening? And you don't have, there's no justification to stop you. The thinking you have something, what's the crime here? Is it a crime to have a gun? well we don't know whether you have a license okay well you don't have a justification there's you the idea that they worm their way through that to argue that you saw a broke the law about something they

Starting point is 00:39:31 don't even know for sure is happening is an excuse they are even taught to do this but the point is it comes down to a reality where she abuses her power and the police officer with her goes along with it because you don't just get to create that based on your so you have a gun no okay well then then you weren't even right about what you were claiming so what's the actual cause here you don't then just go give me your ID because I thought something. That's not legal. That's a violation of his rights. And I should have to explain this.

Starting point is 00:40:00 But either they don't know that because they were taught otherwise or they just don't care. I don't know why that's not like shockingly important to people with where we are in the world right now. Now here's another small example. This one also was, it's not immediately new, but it was one from this, you know, like Venezuela, Trump, this administration. Now, what I find this so interesting is because there's what actually

Starting point is 00:40:28 ended up happening. Here's the full clip I included. I'm going to play the clip that they posted here. And all you don't get in this smaller clip is that they, I'll tell you what they actually say at the end. But she's in the middle of an interview with the media. And they arrest her. Of us, the people to stand against the Trump regime,

Starting point is 00:40:51 the Trump administration that are coming crimes both here in the U.S. and against people in Venezuela. Now in the background of this interview, you could see that police car. And now right here we're showing you video we have immediately after the interview finished. Plicta was arrested by two Grand Rapids police officers. You can see it in the video and an officer tells Plicta that she is being arrested. Okay. Dammit, I mean, did you guys even hear the first part? I can't tell because I only get clips of it.

Starting point is 00:41:21 Because you hear what she was saying before she was arrested? Let me know in the chat. So I know what we're at here. The bottom line is that she was standing there with Kiphan, right? Pro-Palestine, Palestine Garb is talking about Trump and his Venezuela actions, and they walk up and arrest her. Now, they charge her for blocking traffic and ignoring an order from a police officer, which, by the way, the idea that you're ignoring an order of a police officer is not something

Starting point is 00:41:51 they can charge you with unless there's a justifiable cause. You don't just get to go, you do this and you're, I expect my authority. That's not how that works, unless there's something you're doing that is, illegal or you're already in the posse is being detained and then you ignore them. The game they play about their authority is disgusting today. So what I think is most important about this is that, of course, they charge you with, you know, the claim was, well, you were protesting in the street earlier with a group of people. And now you're on video saying I was part of that protest.

Starting point is 00:42:18 So we're going to jump out and arrest you for not stopping the protest that we said was blocking traffic. Which the video you can go ahead and watch is irrelevant. Even if you think it does, isn't at the point. what I think is important is that they later dismissed the case. So what you're seeing is a choice to abuse the situation to harass a person who you disagree with, who you think is part of the Democrat terrorist group or supports Palestine versus Israel. That's what this is. And this is one example of a ton of these.

Starting point is 00:42:48 Now, you may think Democrats bad, so I don't care. But this side of this, whether Democrat or Republican or aware of how both are ridiculous, because what I think is important is that that movement and still existing, support for Palestine was not uniquely partisan. But that's how it got framed to get people to ignore it. So you had people like this that were protesting against Israel and then their rights get violated. They get beat up. They get sprayed with bear spray, whatever. And then it gets ignored because the idea is, well, they're a bunch of terrorists, communist, domestic terrorist. I just don't know why we're that easy to fool or some of us anyway, because it's mostly people lying because they know they're lying. But some people will do fall for this. So keeping that in mind.

Starting point is 00:43:28 One last point, because we are talking about what's coming to us as Americans. In this context, it's important because as an American, what we're discussing is the complete, the authoritarian rise of this power structure in the United States. And so let's quickly revisit the point of where this might go. And let's not forget that a U.S. citizen has already been deported. I covered this, not the children, which also happened, but the guy from Texas. And we covered this back when it happened. And I'm willing to bet you there's more than that.

Starting point is 00:43:58 we even know. The ones that don't have family, the ones that don't have lawyers, the ones that got whisked away, maybe in the beginning. Now, what I'm going to highlight here is where this goes, too, because realize with what they're doing and trying to frame Democrats or just Americans who disagree with the government as some kind of a terrorist or the ones that fight data centers or cut down flock cameras are somehow domestic terrorists, he's already building the case to argue that you can be deported. He said it many times. I'll play the clip. So where we're at is a situation where you're now creating an easier system, a more opaque system. One where there's not as many checks for the process on the way out, one where they've got multiple

Starting point is 00:44:32 countries, they jumped them between so now you don't know where they ended up. They've built this. Ice deported man who says he's a U.S. citizen. Now, this is such a crazy story, even for the Texas Tribune. Do you know why? Because he has a driver, he has a birth certificate. He has Social Security card. The lawyer approved it to the court. It says Brian Jose Morales, Garcia has a birth certificate showing, and please look into this. Look at the last show. It's not just because they claim it. He introduced this evidence to the court, showing that he was born in Denver. ICE agents accused him of lying and says he entered illegally, saying he's a Mexican national. Now, whether or not he is, the point is he has a U.S. He has citizenship in this country. And all they said was we disagree.

Starting point is 00:45:14 Now, if you go to the extent of this case and you go through all the evidence, what it comes down to is evidence versus what the government claims. I'm not making that up. Please dive into this. And what's so in. insane about that is everyone seems to keep the the DHS out claim without evidence somehow is more important than the literal documentation that proves his U.S. citizen. And this is a group by the way that's been caught lying more than any single group that I think I've ever seen in one's, you know, one topic, you know, one, whatever it is, in a year span, like just insane amounts of consistent dishonesty. So if you don't know this, make sure you educate yourself on the reality that this was one. Now, I don't know if they meant to do this or they thought he was an

Starting point is 00:45:55 Mexican national. The point is they literally deported a U.S. citizen, know that now and never tried to correct that. It's disgusting. Now, I'll also include the different shows we have about this topic. Trump deportations revealed to be full of innocent people, legal immigrants with no criminal record, people who actually had the right to be here legally and didn't have a criminal record, who got scooped up in that first plane to El Salvador, many of which never came back because they didn't have the right representation. This was 2025. American speaking out about Israel's genocide could be next. In principle, it's the same thing. Osir Kahl. Now, they ultimately only won, but they try, guys. And Trump has made it clear that Americans could be next.

Starting point is 00:46:32 They had an amendment to stop deportation of U.S. citizens. They got voted down, 2025 in May. Also, the DHS has been caught, and please watch this if you don't know that. That's all on record caught lying about detaining and deporting U.S. citizens. Over and over and over. McGlachlan, Noam, Bondi, just insane amounts of very clear dishonesty. Actually, I hope this doesn't cause this to free out, but I want to add that clip real quick, Let's see. You guys have all seen it, but I do think it's important for those that haven't because many people, you know, almost don't believe these things because of the media and the algorithms until they actually see them for themselves. Where to go?

Starting point is 00:47:20 There it is. It's bad now, the authoritarianism that is coming. Gerald, I am really, really fearful for the president of the United States of America to suggest, as he did, or force one on Sunday night, that American citizens could be deported for his press secretary to say, we're looking into a way to see if this is legal. We don't know if it's legal or not. A is terrifying. B. betrays such a profound ignorance of first principles to which he is sworn. He is sworn to preserve, protect and defend the Constitution and to enforce federal law. open to deporting individuals that aren't foreign aliens, brought criminals to El Salvador.

Starting point is 00:48:09 Does that include potentially U.S. citizens fully naturalized in Iraq? If they're criminals and if they hit people with baseball bats over their head that happened to be 90 years old, and if if they rape 87-year-old women in Coney Island, Brooklyn, yeah, yeah, that includes them. Why do you think there's special category of person? They're as bad as anybody that comes in. We have bad ones, too. Profoundly un-American, utterly unconstitutional, and I'm sorry to say, is coming.

Starting point is 00:48:44 Seems clear to me. Now, in one clip, he talks about naturalized, which is still a U.S. citizen, another he talks about being born here. So it's undeniable guys, as Paul Tano is clearly worried about. Now, here's a couple different articles. ProPublica, we covered this as well.

Starting point is 00:49:03 They found more than 100. 70 U.S. citizens that have been held illegally by immigration agents, even though they lie about that. Kick, dragged, detained, the U.S. veteran we just talked about. Reitz. We also have children who were U.S. citizens that were deported, and even though the mothers wanted them to stay and they argued the families wanted them to leave, like in this whole game they played. Just disgusting. Now, Aaron Mellick points out the Trump administration just published a new regulation allowing asylum officers at the U.S. government to deny hundreds of thousands of applications without an interview sending applicants directly to deportation proceedings. So it means that people will never get a chance

Starting point is 00:49:43 to argue their case. Right. So what I'm showing, and this is in everything you can see right now, whether and even a point I might make, I forget if I included it today. Now, I think I pulled it off. And when we get into Iran in the next conversation, a point about the nuclear conversation with Netanyahu flying to see Trump right now, people wondering whether they're trying to convince him to kind of rationalized tactical nukes. At the same time, you got Donald Trump lessening the the radiation concern. Now, I don't want to go into without having the stuff in front of me, but the point is trying to lessen the allowance of radiation in a general sense. Seems kind of a weird coincidence, doesn't it? Maybe there's something to that. My point is in any

Starting point is 00:50:17 number of categories, you're seeing this degradation, you know, like the safety things or like the idea of, you know, bureaucracy, really talking about removing, what's the word they were using, basically talking about things that we want for us, but they apply to corporations instead. You know, the idea, like if you're talking about regulations and whatever else, in the word I'm missing, you know, the point is all that allows corporations to dump stuff in your water, not something that would be aimed at you.

Starting point is 00:50:43 And it's like they're abusing this practice, or Mahan general. They want to make you healthy and then doing all the opposite. So I think this opens the door in all of these ways, that not specifically that, but the direction they're taking in regard to opening the door to making it easier to do what they've been. want to get around the law. Now, this is another point that's very relevant that overlaps with what we're about to get into. You might have seen this. Bombino, I guess, I think accidentally,

Starting point is 00:51:11 and even tries to hide it and makes it worse, admits that Israel is training police and IDF, or you mean, excuse me, police and ICE. And you know this already. I've proven it. I'll show you it again. But for those that still don't want to hear it, this is real. And that means that they train them with their tactics, which we are seeing in everyday life. The nation over there has a lot, a lot of influence on the Israeli government has a lot of influence on our politicians over here, I think, is what he was kind of getting at. I see, yeah. And, you know, I'm not a politician, so I don't know. And, you know, it's the only dealings I ever had with the Israelis is when I was a young

Starting point is 00:51:52 agent with Borchak, Border Patrol Tactical Unit, they sent me to a VIP security school and it was ran by the Israelis. And let me tell you. So IDF actually does work with border patrol and ICE because I've always heard that. Well, it was a that school is for all law enforcement. It was they put it on. It was Israeli. They contracted with Israeli instructors. They had a lot of experience and they were really good. I'll hands off some of the best training I've ever had. They did not F around. So that was back, you know, 2000, 2001. But. I understand what people are saying perhaps there is an outsized influence by Israel. I've never really been up against that.

Starting point is 00:52:35 But then again, I'm not a politician. Israel wouldn't influence me, the Mossad, or whatever. You know, however they do that, I'd like to know what, you know, what is the influence? How do they do that? So that's important, guys. Just like this casual point about that. And again, it's frustrating that people don't take the time to learn this because it's easily prove provable.

Starting point is 00:53:03 No, I think I have them in the wrong spot real quick. This point. ICE and the Israeli military are two sides of the same coin. We must resist both as Truthout. There's an example of Israeli soldiers actually serving in ICE disputed, but it is somebody out the allegation. The point is you can literally prove this, guys. ICE also signs contracts with Aragon solutions,

Starting point is 00:53:23 an Israeli spy, what do they call it, spyware company, which, by the way, Trump also, Where was it? Trump gives green light. No, that's the, that's the anyway. Trump administration is the one opening the door to Paragon Solutions, even though it's a fraudulent company

Starting point is 00:53:43 that's been accused of crimes and been felt guilty of crimes, journalists very clearly. So what I want to highlight is the technology now that we're seeing. ICE's fingertips very quickly. Leak document shows the spread of surveillance and investigations capabilities that ICE officials have access to agency-wide

Starting point is 00:54:01 from location data, harvesting from smartphones, yep, to facial recognition. Like, that means yours, guys, not just selectively. Like, these are things they're scooping up using Israeli cars that are meant to act like Stingray. These are, and it's not just some hyperbole, guys, that's literally the reality. And it says, do tools that let the agency stay anonymous online, all the things they're stealing from you. And it goes into plenty of them. Accurate, a Lexis tool for locating people that contain all sorts of personal data, like addresses, phone numbers, social security numbers,

Starting point is 00:54:34 Camillion, their tool, which provides anonymized means to conduct online investigations. Now, noticeably leave out all of the ones that are really most problems, you know, the ones that are obviously connected to the bigger point, whether it's U.S. intelligence, whether it's severely intelligence. Either way. Invasive unconstitutional surveillance under the justification of finding illegal immigrants that they're even being called out by from the conservative side

Starting point is 00:54:57 for not doing what they were supposed to. I'm glad I had that highlighted. Now, this is important as we get into the surveillance of the cameras and what they're doing to us. You might have seen this. I briefly pointed to do a lot of this yesterday on the way out. U.S. accused the American of allegedly wiping his phone using a duress password. Now, again, this is sort of the same point that the police unconstitutional invasion of your life. This just happened at the border.

Starting point is 00:55:24 Now, there's many important points to this that apply to what they're doing with flock and everything else, acting like there's caveats for your rights, unalienable. does not mean except when, okay? They don't get to do that, not even with national security. They will. Doesn't mean they're allowed to. The U.S. Justice Department is prosecuting an American citizen for allegedly providing U.S. border authorities with a pass code

Starting point is 00:55:46 that wiped the contents of his phone, according to an indictment in media reports. This is thought to be the first known case in the United States where federal prosecutors have charged someone, charge them with a crime, for the alleged destruction of data using a duress password built in the phone software. You mean data they never even saw?

Starting point is 00:56:05 What's the crime here, ladies and gentlemen, that you hid information they had yet to look at? So the point would be that they think there was a crime. They never proved that. You were able to hide your information, which is your information. They weren't allowed to do it in the first place, which is the truth, even though they argue otherwise. And they're going to charge you with a crime for deleting you. I just, guys, this is probably the best example of where we actually are right now. And on top of that, the importance of why you should go in this direction.

Starting point is 00:56:30 there's any number of things you can do. And I believe there's even things you can add to normal ones. But again, the point is to get away for de-Google direction, to get away from the current stuff. And the point is that there's a passcode in this app where you can, if you enter that passcode, it wipes the phone clean. And so he ultimately gave them that code as his, and they did it, and they wiped the phone.

Starting point is 00:56:51 And so they're charging him with a crime for that. Atlanta resident Samuel Tunick is fighting the charges. Rightly so. Tunic's attorney said that it was all unlawful for U.S. customs border protection to seize his phone as he arrived back in the United States, right? He's an American. And it shouldn't matter either way. Everybody has constitutional rights despite the stupidity of some people in this country last year and any, and that any evidence he writes, including the alleged wiping of his phone, should have been thrown out. Tunick's case also raises ongoing

Starting point is 00:57:19 questions about what constitutional rights can be invoked at the border. Guess what, guys? All of them, which the U.S. government has long asserted. You ready for this? Is not U.S. soil and a person is authorized to enter. Okay, wait a minute. You're telling me that we have to abide by your law anywhere we go in the world, that we have, our rights will apply in the context that you allow for anywhere in the world, right? As you pushed on us many times, you have to pay taxes over there.

Starting point is 00:57:46 That's not right. The point is they apply these things except when they don't want to. Right. Either they're unalienable or they're not, especially as an American. Are you telling me somehow I magically don't have my rights when I step over that imaginary line? Really? Now, then that might be even more alarming when you realize that they've created that 100 mile no constitution zone, easy to look up. ACOUs has been calling it out for years that goes around the border. 100 miles. That means the entire state of Maine exist in a limbo where

Starting point is 00:58:15 apparently your rights don't exist. All that shows you is to them, they don't exist at all. So what they're highlighting is that, well, you're not in the country yet so we can do whatever we want. So by that, by that right, you could do literally anything. Does anybody actually agree with that. So all they're trying to do is create this black hole where they get to invade your rights. That doesn't apply to anybody. Nobody should have their rights abused. Human rights or otherwise because they claim they have a safety job. It's the same thing they're doing the flock. The government's incident. And it realize you can argue that there's a necessity for safety, right? And they could turn people away if they want. That is their

Starting point is 00:58:49 prerogative. But the idea that they abuse, like, we'll say come on in. But then, oh, now we have to strip search you, anal search you, take your phone, strip down your data. That's not how that works, guys. The government's indictment, which contains a typo, of course, literally wrote untied states code. It's supposed to be United States Code. Think about what a perfect example that is of who we're dealing with. You know, just this typo in this thing, you know, they are the sophomoric second grade, you know, they are the junior high team, guys. And it says, accuses Ternick of allegedly providing a pass code to border agents that caused a phone to delete visual contents prior to the device being seized.

Starting point is 00:59:28 Now, what if you were to say, oh, you know what? I mixed up my codes. Good luck, provilous nature of what they're doing. Because they don't even know what was in there in the first place. They don't even know if there was actually crimes. And you know what, whether there was or not, it doesn't change the reality of this. He was a repeatedly denied access to an attorney and it wasn't even informed of his legal rights. Okay, wait a minute now.

Starting point is 00:59:48 Are you saying this? Now he's still over the borderline? Well, clearly not, guys. clearly he's been brought in to their facility. But you see, that's my point, because to them, that still exists in this black hole limbo where your rights don't exist, even though you're on U.S. soil within a U.S. institution, inside of a U.S. government building.

Starting point is 01:00:04 But nope, your rights don't exist here. Welcome to the future. Well, wait until they absorb everything else with that because of safety and justification. Wasn't even given access to attorney. That's how they look at this. Your rights don't exist when we decide. Turnics of attorneys accuse the government of demanding access to his phone under the pretext of searching for child exploitation imagery.

Starting point is 01:00:27 You see, it's that they know that's what some of the blind followers want to hear. So they use that excuse to go in to do whatever they want. And they don't even care about that. Seeing as hell, they don't care about the Epstein files are clearly letting pedophiles go back to Israel. And, you know, the whole thing. But it says, but without providing evidence to justify the suspicion, which means they have no probable cause. The motion said that the border agents claim they did not need a warrant to search his phone because he had not yet crossed the border.

Starting point is 01:00:52 Okay. If you believe that's the case, well, then you live in an authoritarian dictatorship that decides you have rights when you're in a certain location. Good luck with that. Time to wake up, Americans. Guys, this is real and it's right in our face. Now you guys know that. You watch this show. You've known that for a long time. Now, let's play James Lee's clip on this, which I think is important to see about the concern about the bait and switch, which I agree. We should be considering. And then we'll go on from there about what I think is important to look at the numbers. He also just talked to Derek Bro, again, by the way, just to check out. Interview he did. I think Trump and the Trump administration are the ones pushing these viral videos of people destroying flock cameras. Because I'm not gonna lie, all this looks super badass. But before we start celebrating,

Starting point is 01:01:42 I think we have to ask a much bigger question. Why is all of this anti-flok coverage suddenly exploding right now? Is this movement actually organic, or could it have been hijacked by more nefarious dark forces behind the scenes. Take Denver Colorado. When Denver decided to part ways with flock after a massive public outcry, they didn't turn off the surveillance state. Instead, what they did was turn around in hand millions of dollars in new contracts to defense tech giant Axon Enterprise,

Starting point is 01:02:14 the multi-billion dollar monopoly behind tasers, police body cams, and highly integrated AI crime centers. And if we follow the money, things get even more interesting. Axon has spent years aggressively banning its law and Trump have personally invested millions of dollars into Axon, betting big on the continued future buildout of privatized law enforcement infrastructure. So you have to wonder, is all of this viral backlash against Flock simply clearing the way for an even bigger, more nefarious, more well-connected defense tech monopoly to take over America's mass surveillance ambitions?

Starting point is 01:02:56 just asking the question. And I think it's important. We should be asking that, right? But I do think it's important to understand some of the nuance, which he's gone in following videos, has gone into as well. And this is about the idea of, you know, really, it's always important to ask those questions.

Starting point is 01:03:14 And as he would argue as well, it's also important not to just allow that to become an assumption and guide your future direction, right? And so what I'm seeing as well as this concern about whether or not this was sort of a setup. But again, even if it was, don't let that because some people are now going like we shouldn't be jumping at this they're trying to trap you and it's like well you can make your own individual decisions about how you act on it but to say we shouldn't be

Starting point is 01:03:37 doing anything that means just allow unconstitutional unconstitutional surveillance because otherwise we'd be doing what they want from like it's it's a trap it's a trap in and of itself but it also could be exactly what he's highlighting here that they know we're going to be up in arms about it and so they create a problem reaction solution situation right and that's how this tends to Go. Now, and again, and everything you heard in there from stock and everything else you heard in our show in the 20th. Now, this is important to me. Right. So what this shows you is the numbers. So right now, you're getting a lot. And like, so after our kind of coverage like that, James putting his coverage out, you've got a lot of the kind of Twitter reverberation like I talked about, where you got all these new people making clips like that, just breaking it down and making a little piece about it and ultimately selling the idea. aggressively that it's all ax on it was always the plan it's like whoa whoa whoa right so you can see the

Starting point is 01:04:32 difference between asking the question and making the concern clear and wondering whether versus them going this is the thing because trump paid it we know what's happening that's what you get from the mainstream alternative flock safety right now 83% of the entire field in this country 83%. So the question is obviously even if flock is being you know resisted and suddenly acts on with a focal point we have a long way to go before that actually becomes, you know, no longer the majority of the ones we should be fighting. And either way, we should still be fighting flock, or rather just always be fighting unconstitutional surveillance, or any form of automatic license plate reader or any number of other things.

Starting point is 01:05:11 Let's not only focus on this one thing, right? That in itself could be the point. That while we're going license plate readers, like thousands of other things are coming out, this, it's just about making sure we stay objective and keep our eyes open. 5% of the total. So 83% is flock. 5% is what's called Motorola solutions or rather vigilant solutions, which is the actual name of the company that makes the,

Starting point is 01:05:36 it's under Motorola Solutions and then Vigilant Solutions is the name of the actual product. So 5%. What you'll notice you don't even see Axon on here. You know, why? Because it exists within this 5% where 83 others exist. And I think it's something like 2 or 3% total or maybe even less than that. It's up in the air because there's a lot of, you know, contracts and conversation. that's not necessarily exactly in place yet.

Starting point is 01:06:00 But what I want to highlight is, oh, you know what? I take it back, actually, because I believe it was one, it's less than because the 2% was Genetac, which is another one that nobody's even talking about. But under that is Axon. That exists within this 5% in total of 83 others. So I believe Axon is going to be an increasing one. We just saw 53 different counties at least begin that process.

Starting point is 01:06:26 Right? Now remember, as he also pointed out, or actually first, the one that I, this is the one about Motorola. It's within this article and you can look into the deep parts of it. He invested Trump personally, which by the way, I don't know why is not a conflict of interest. By the way, it is invested into Motorola. And within that was Motorola Solutions, which is vigilant solutions. So he does have stock investment in vigilant solutions. But he also, oh, and this one was showing you the connection to ICE as well, which you should know is being ubiquitously used.

Starting point is 01:06:53 The records show that 9,000 ICE agents have access to very very much. fast automated license plate reader database. And this one specifically was Vigilant Solutions. This was $6 million contract. ACLU highlighted back in 2019. So this is an earlier version of that, clearly. So Trump invested in it after the fact, but so clearly this was something they were already doing.

Starting point is 01:07:13 Now, with the introduction of AI, these things have been turned into a whole new animal, right? And so question is, maybe that's the original point, and the rest of this is to distract us. No, we should just care about all of them, right? That's the point. Care about the idea of the principle, not just the focal point within it.

Starting point is 01:07:28 Realize that the actual act of all of this should stop. And also here's the article about Axon. So, yep, Trump also bought stock. Is this kind of report, which I agree is important. And it's even weird, and almost the way he frames this makes me suspicious about why it's being stated like this. Saying Axion is axon, excuse me, is safe and effective. To me, that's almost a little bit too much, right? And what's funny is,

Starting point is 01:07:56 Shadow Bez was reporting, axon's already acquired Carbine. Well, it already acquired. I mean, this was from 20, 20, this was 2025 when they did that. I just think it's funny, is that you get, I don't even seen anybody else

Starting point is 01:08:15 really talking about that. I know there are others. I just haven't seen it. Talking about the axon connection to the Israeli spyware. and then it becomes sort of like a passing point for some of the people that get that glean from our interesting though, isn't it? Black Rock and Vanguard, the largest shareholders at Axon. Yeah, which I do think is a problem, but like half of everything and also rumble that none of you guys seem to care about. So it's funny, the selected point. Nonetheless, this clip is important because what you're getting is Knoxville police saying they've replaced flock with Axon and saying that it's better because of X, Y, and Z.

Starting point is 01:08:47 right but as I'm seeing even in Tennessee you're getting a larger push about these in general so you makes you wonder what's the point to this clip what were they trying to accomplish why would they come out and tell you we're doing something different to me that that raises my suspicion more than anything else people's minds about these i can speak for the knoxville police department um and i can speak for our commitment as an agency to use this technology the right way our technology our commitment to to building, again, policy, strong policies that ensure that the technology is used the way it was intended to be used and that we are committed absolutely to being transparent with how we're using that technology. Just talking about LPRs is, again, circling back to this, is one of

Starting point is 01:09:39 the most impactful investigative tools that have come into police in decades. And so, So I want people just to really hope that people will take the time to understand how their police department is using LPRs, the policies that we have in place, and how we deal with these situations, whether it has to do with LPRs or anything else, when there might be anything that's outside of policy. And so that's what I would say when you're looking at a technology, the RTIC. We're an open book. We've got nothing to hide.

Starting point is 01:10:13 And we want the community to understand. understand what technology we're using and how we're using it. See, that won't seem to be easier for me to watch for some reason. I wonder what the difference is. In any case, this is the same idea. Like, maybe he's genuine, you know, that just a gut and doesn't mean it's true. He seems like a guy who believes what he's saying, right? So it doesn't make a difference, though.

Starting point is 01:10:35 It doesn't matter how it helps. And this is where we have to get to, the principle of it all, right? I don't care what you argue it will do. In most cases, that, you know, rarely comes to fruition, all the promises, right? but regardless is ultimately the rights that you have. It doesn't matter though, the safety. Oh, the crimes will stop. Oh, the blah, blah, blah.

Starting point is 01:10:53 Well, does it violence my rights or not? Aren't you supposed to be the one that's protecting that? You know, these people have lost the direction. They don't know what their job is anymore. Or in fact, they just believe that, you know, or maybe we don't know what their job is anymore. Or never did. Orwell Day,

Starting point is 01:11:13 flock cameras removed from Syracuse City property are being replaced by Axon. Here's another example. So this is happening. And I believe it's going to be happening more and more, but let's keep an eye on the numbers. And again, to me, it honestly doesn't even matter at this point.

Starting point is 01:11:24 It's about stopping all of it. That's where I'm seeing most of the people that I think are honest in this that have been calling out flock cameras before it was a big thing that was happening, have all now shifted to going, look, we just want to stop the cameras in general because it's become this worry that it's a flock thing. You know, and it's, I get it.

Starting point is 01:11:38 I understand. I actually appreciate the fact that the community is so skeptical right now. We need more of that. But don't let it stop you from doing what you actually believe. in regardless of what the rest of people around you think. License plate reader cameras, they're all now gone. But news channel lines Victoria Kellogg says while one system is out, another is apparently taking its place.

Starting point is 01:12:10 While these cameras, all 13 of them, have only been gone for a few days. The effort to remove them started months ago. Fifth District Councilor Jimmy Montau says that push has paid off. We're happy that those 13 are gone. I would be happier if Flock had no cameras at all in the city or the county or anywhere around here. But for now, I'm happy that they're at least they're off city property. And the change goes beyond this intersection. City Hall now says that all Flock cameras in the city of Syracuse are now gone following months of debate over privacy and data sharing.

Starting point is 01:12:46 A simple Google search kind of tells you what the problems are with Flock or where we were seeing problems with their actions. especially around, you know, new Americans and immigrants and the tracking of humans. The city didn't walk away from cameras. It changed who will provide them, approving the switch to Axon, another license plate recognition system that Syracuse police says is important for investigating homicides and other crimes. We are going to watch very carefully to make sure that people's rights, people that are just walking around the city of Syracuse, driving around the city, going to a grocery store, they know what's happening when they're, face is scanned when their license plate is scanned. Monto says once the axon cameras are deployed, the real test for him is just the beginning.

Starting point is 01:13:33 We want to make sure we're using. Yeah, yeah, whatever. The point is the fact that, you know, we want to make sure it's your, your face being scanned the proper way. How in the world is that where that goes? You know, are they standing out, they're going, we don't like the company flock. Are they saying we don't like the flock cameras because of what they're doing? So in a way, you could argue the sciap was to get that.

Starting point is 01:13:55 focus on the company versus the actual idea. Maybe that was the whole point or all of it together. But the idea that they're acting like, we hear you, we care. We can't let this happen. Unconstitutional, but these ones are better because we'll make sure they're doing it the right. Wait, wait, wait, wait. If they were problematic to begin with, why are the second ones different? You say, it's just they're playing you. Or rather, maybe they think they are because I don't think it's working. Oh, and this time, like I included before, This is important. I realize that Axon in particular,

Starting point is 01:14:36 there's different. You know, basically, as I highlighted before, or even, I think it's the show before a couple of, or I don't know, maybe three, four shows ago. The idea of the, the surveillance connection of through flock and all the rest of it, Leonardo point, the site of the record, by an actual obvious son was the one leaning into the

Starting point is 01:15:06 taser armed drones, which arguably didn't happen. Now, here's a police officer in Wisconsin, who's being caught secretly installing flock cameras. Now, again, the point shouldn't be about flock. In some cases, I bet you they're using the word flock when that might even be the actual thing. It's just license plate reader cameras. But I think it is flock in this case, and getting caught doing so despite what people want. So it's clear this is going forward regardless. So why I think I'm highlighting this so aggressively today is because I'm I think what they're doing right now is to get us scattered so they can rush this through. Like every time.

Starting point is 01:15:35 And then we turn around and go, but wait, we don't want it. Well, too late now it's national security. Like that's what every time happens, guys. People are seeing it. It is under fire after installing flock cameras without informing the mayor or city council. The city of Chatech installed two flock cameras in late May in a city council meeting about the issue last week. Chatech Police Chief Ron Ambrositis had. a outburst in response to public comments criticizing the use of flock cameras.

Starting point is 01:16:10 He has since apologized for his actions at the meeting. Mayor Jeff Martin said he stands with the police of chief on his use of the cameras. Chief, he did nothing illegal or wrong. As the head of his department, he has the right. If he thinks, hey, this tool will help, he didn't have to come. to me or the council and ask permission. It's part of his operating budget. So the funds for these things came out of his operating budget.

Starting point is 01:16:43 He had the money, I assume, because again, he didn't ask for extra. That's good. We reached out to the Chatec Police chief. Right, right. Yeah. So, you know, he's got the right to do something that's unquestionably unconstitutional, right? Because he spent, he paid for it. Who are these people?

Starting point is 01:17:01 This is your government, ladies and gentlemen. people who don't even know how to tie their shoes, but they're literally telling you how you're going to live your life. Think about that. The police chief has no right to do, like, what's okay, so you tell me the police chief can install cameras looking into your windows?

Starting point is 01:17:17 No. How is that any different? It's unconstitutional surveillance. They just pretend like it's, you know, their argument is, but this will be to keep you safe. Who cares? I don't.

Starting point is 01:17:28 And even if you do, it doesn't change the fact that there shall not be infringed or rather, you know, the idea is specifically, about something that they're not allowed to just create a justification for. We used to remember this, right? But because we're being so mired in these fake partisan online AI debates, people miss it. But I argue right now that's changing.

Starting point is 01:17:53 Thomas Massey comes out, and again, I'm glad this is what, so this is the kind of thing that I, when I see, I go, okay, good. Like, this is what I wanted from somebody to show that you aren't just playing into some kind of a game, right? I still, like I said, I probably never, ever go to. part of politics, but this person will continue to do things that will make me more and more think he's actually caring about what he does. I like every other time waiting for that shoot, the Tulsi-Gabbard RFK shoot a drop. It's just how white history has been. I hope not. Either way,

Starting point is 01:18:21 he says, I'll soon be sponsoring a bill to withhold federal money from municipalities and police departments that deploy flock and other style cameras to surveil law-abiding citizens. So not about flock in particular, but that's the name people know. It's about any of them. I guarantee it won't pass, but at least he's doing it. But then right there, you should ask yourself whether he's doing it, knowing it won't pass because it'll make him look like the one resisting. I don't believe that. In fact, I think what he's been doing is showing you clearly that he has these principles.

Starting point is 01:18:49 The question is whether he will ignore them for his own benefit when time comes. That's politics for you. But you can decide for yourself. Glenn Jacobs shares this, and this is another positive note, guys. Now, who knows if he means it? And again, this is my point about politicians in general. that at the end of the day, politicians will lean into whatever benefits them.

Starting point is 01:19:10 That's what their job is. Sad, but the truth. So I'd like to change that. I'd like there'd be no government, but since so many people want it, for whatever reason, the point would be that we see an opportunity, basically what we see is a situation

Starting point is 01:19:22 where if we know what they are, well, then what drives them is their own interests, opportunity, right? Their profiteers, their opportunists. So if we show them, like is so clear right now, which clearly, well, on a different topic on like Israel and other things, people like Marjorie Jell the Green and others clearly caught onto that and have leaned into it and

Starting point is 01:19:38 have incredible amounts of support despite the system attacking them, right? In this case, he's supporting the removal of flock cameras. And so does he mean it? Or is he just recognizing that he's going to gain so much support that it's worth that even if he gets attacked by things that he otherwise leaned into? You know, his lobbying turns on it or whatever. It's a is the juice worth the squeeze? And I think people are realizing that if you get massive support, you end up like a massive.

Starting point is 01:20:05 like a mark and that is hugely beneficial as we see things changing so question his intentions and always hold his feet to the fire because i i expect people like this down the line will quietly fall back into line i hope i'm wrong here's what he says and all this shows you is either he means this and that's a great thing because he hears us and he cares or because they know that we all don't want this that he's leaning into it for his benefit either way it shows you that we're having an effect County Mayor Glenn Jacobs. Today I am urging our commission to prohibit the use of flock cameras and similar devices in our county. For those of you who don't know, these cameras, technically called automated license plate readers, are motion activated and take a picture of every vehicle which passes by. While license plate readers have been around for a while, because of AI and vastly increased networking and data retention capacities, these

Starting point is 01:21:02 Flot cameras have capabilities not even imagined in the past. Older cameras only took a photo of your license plate, which was then retained for a short time. Flot cameras take a photo of your plate, but also use AI to catalog distinguishing features of your vehicle. Make, color, model, even bumper stickers. That data is stored in a searchable database for sometimes up to a month or more depending on the policies of that particular agency. When these cameras are deployed in large numbers, they create a network that can be used to track your movements. Currently, there is no federal regulatory framework governing these devices in place, and the Tennessee laws regulating them were written over a decade ago.

Starting point is 01:21:55 My fear is that we may be inadvertently creating a warrantless mass surveillance system and undermining the privacy and liberty of our people. So I urge the Tennessee General Assembly and the United States Congress to look at this issue and take necessary action to safeguard our privacy and civil liberties as these new technologies continue to emerge. Thank you. No, of course it's Tennessee. It's one of the places that really does, at least the people, the politicians understand that people truly want their freedom and their privacy.

Starting point is 01:22:33 so you see that, right? But, you know, I just, I get the sense in there that there's, you know, almost that one point that I made that I heard where it's the idea that this is inadvertent. I mean, how in the world could you even say that? I mean, how was it even inadvertent? Like, that doesn't even seem like an honest thing to say. It's obviously advertent. It's not even the right word.

Starting point is 01:22:58 I'm just kind of joking, inadvertent, but deliberate is my point. It's obviously something they designed to do that. That's the point. So it's a weird thing to say. But continuing, I think it's good that he's saying is my point because he sees the opportunity. Jason Bassler says, let's set the record straight. We do not want flock. We don't want Axol.

Starting point is 01:23:15 We don't want more to roll out. We don't want anyone building a database of our daily lives. We just want to live without being tracked, monitored, logged, profiled, or monetized. Just leave us alone. but they won't do that. Where are they go? With the light, this is specifically flock, but Axon has similar versions.

Starting point is 01:23:38 They're all going in the same direction. It's like the rush for the vaccine point, guys, you pick your poison, right? That's what the COVID-19 time frame or anything else. Josh says, remember when everyone told you flock was just reading license plates? Well, here's flock alpha. Now, realize that already they're lying about that or with the earliest versions of these things. But on top of that, we have the additional things they could add to them, which make this like, you know, invasive to your cell phone,

Starting point is 01:24:01 absorbing your data. This one specifically talks about, it's called Flock Alpha, as he highlights, the autonomous drone dynamic. And this is surveillance, this is deployable, and this overlaps with Axon, right? Or any of them is the point.

Starting point is 01:24:13 But this is where it's going. So realize this is not inadvertent. It's always been the plan, at least in my opinion. So I don't think this one's playing. Is that not playing? God, it's so frustrating. May in the U.S.

Starting point is 01:26:24 Asterk at the bottom, with the U.S., with Israeli help, made by Israeli spies. So that's where this goes. I don't think that's a secret to people paying attention. I mean, the drone enforcement has been around, I mean, I'm going to end with the clip today. It's going to show you what's like in China, but it's just not a secret. All of them are leaning in that direction. It's a matter of when. ICE has already been using these to some degree.

Starting point is 01:26:49 They've already been leaning that direction, but it's not something that's been mass adopted or at least mass, like, revealed. But, I mean, as somebody puts in the comment, you know, there's contracts going out about drone docks and deployments for the police. I mean, guys, how do we not see where this goes? It's obvious this is the direction, and it's about keeping us the population in control. Now, Orwell-Day says this is what we're up against.

Starting point is 01:27:13 I showed you this in the last show yesterday, but just to really quickly highlight this, and he's right, this is the map of all the counties in the United States. He said there are about 3,000 of them. According to deflock.org, there are about 90 cities that have stopped all, stop using flock cameras, the license plate readers,

Starting point is 01:27:27 in general or just in general the cameras, right? Many of which have sub-quietly switched ax on, but it says that city is not counties. To show us the approximate guess as to how much progress we've made, and this he just bunches them together to show you the, you know, they're scattered, right? But just taking the look, this is where we are. The gray is where they are largely, not ubiquitously, right?

Starting point is 01:27:47 But the red are where they're actually somewhat being stopped. Like, we have a long way to go. And so let's make an, we're barely getting into it. We have people already head faking about why we're falling. for the flock thing. You know, it's like, well, even if that's the case, guys, why would the argument be not to call this out?

Starting point is 01:28:05 That feels like the SIAP itself. Does it not? Now, he also points out he got his account momentarily blocked, suspended, for uploading a video of how to cut down a flock camera. Now, he says they claimed it was a video

Starting point is 01:28:23 that was directly encouraging people to participate in illegal activity, By the way, despite, before I even read the rest of, despite the fact that there's tons of content just like that on this platform about things they're okay with, you know, about murdering Palestinian children, for example, or any number of horrifying things that they'll absolutely be okay with. Or even things that, for example, like, okay, arguably,

Starting point is 01:28:42 you could find clips on here about how to 3D print things that would be illegal, but that's okay because we all agree with those things, right? Except this one, they don't. It's a selective application. The idea being that they will censor people they don't agree with and allow those they do because this is not a free speech platform. But nonetheless, he continues to say, I can understand their position and a 12-hour suspension is not the worst they could have done. The part that concerns me most is that they also said if it happens again, they may suspend and may not.

Starting point is 01:29:08 Could be permanent. You know, they threaten that opaquely. And says, I don't want to lose touch with you, in my opinion, we're building a movement here, not just a place to share content. If you would like to make sure we don't lose ability to communicate, he gives you his website. But what it was about the taking down a flock camera, a cool how-to video. Well, right now I can find videos like that on this platform right now. Now, I'm sure if you push, they'd probably sense to those two. My point is this person is getting a lot of momentum and attention around this topic.

Starting point is 01:29:35 So they threw him some shade. That's what this comes down to to me, because it's selectively applied as anybody can see. Now, this is a good clip I want to play with you or share with you. Troy flock cameras destroyed at three locations. Mayor responds. Mayor Carmela called it a violent act by an unhinged individual.

Starting point is 01:29:59 As we know, they're trying to create the idea that we're all terrorists for caring about our rights. Nothing new, but now it's about the anti-tech extremism. It's the new term, right? Right-wing, terrorism, left-wing, communist monseal, whatever

Starting point is 01:30:11 whatever the new thing they can use to go after any American that doesn't agree with what they're doing. That's amazing we haven't woken up to this by now. But, and again, this is why this is happening

Starting point is 01:30:22 because they're trying to coordinate the illusion. They don't want people to see what's happening. And I don't think it's even about the video. I think it's about stopping that person's ability to continue to get viral posts about what people are actually doing. But here's a clip about them calling you an unhinged crazy person for actually caring about this. An act of violence that was done by an unhinged individual.

Starting point is 01:30:49 The vandal struck at three separate locations in the Collar City, automated license plate reading cameras, ALPRs, also referred to as flock cameras, were destroyed sometime overnight at a time when these cameras have stirred up a great deal of controversy in the city. There has been a nationwide concern about flock cameras. Some people feel like they need to take matters into their own hands when their government is not. It's unfortunate. Deirdre Shea is with the organization DeFlock Troy, a group that has been involved in a concerted effort for there to be reasonable guidelines and oversight for the data collected by the cameras.

Starting point is 01:31:27 If these cameras help police solve crimes, if they help them take bad people off the streets, you could argue that that's a good thing. Absolutely, but there has to be balanced, right? And right now that this technology is totally unrestricted and can be used without a warrant, right? Do you want somebody to be following you around town without a warrant? You want there to be probable cause, you want there to be a due process, right? And there aren't any rules around that right now. In a joint statement from Mayor Carmela Mantello and police chief Dandewolf, they point out these acts do nothing to improve our community.

Starting point is 01:32:02 Enough is enough. Troy deserves better than this, and together we will continue working to preserve and protect the community we all love. Deirdre Shea stresses she condemns the vandalism. It is not our organization's method of activism. Also from the mayor's office, we refuse to allow the acts of a few individuals define our community. This act, they say, will be thoroughly investigated. All right, I missed the last part there.

Starting point is 01:32:42 But so the point I want to get into, you know, obviously this is happening. People aren't happy with this. And whatever action they decided to take, which I'll bring up the article right now of Jason Bassers' article for TLAV, eight ways to take down a flock camera without a solzal, meaning simply, you know, going through, you know, protesting, petitioning your government, like any number of things, right? And the point, there we go. That, as you said in the video, right, I mean, it's unconstitutional, right?

Starting point is 01:33:14 There shouldn't be any conversation about whether or not it benefits police if what they're doing is illegal, guys, that's wrong. But then, you know, the idea, shouldn't that be a good thing? You know, but the point is that people are taking this action. They're called unhinged lunatics. You can decide to go, you know, as somebody wrote in the chat, actually, is it violence against an inanimate object? in an adamant object? Yes. Or rather no, I mean, the point would be how can you argue that it's violence if it's not against another person?

Starting point is 01:33:37 It's an interesting point. But either way, the idea that they're pushing it regardless just shows you everything. They really don't care about adhering to the founding documentation of this country. What they want to do is surveil you unjustifiably. And this is a great article to understand that many different ways you can go after this in a legal way. But on top of that, realizing that one of the points he makes is demand evidence, guys, because what they'll keep claiming like they did there, you know, if it helps the cops, well, that's a good question, bud, does it? Have you only listened to what flock says or axon or have actually looked at the stats from places where they've been put in?

Starting point is 01:34:12 Because you guess what? They're not there. Because the data, guess what, doesn't back up what they're saying, as Jason's been screaming about. You can look for yourself. Oh, it stops this and it does that and reduces crime by 30%. Well, it turns out those numbers are in vacuum somewhere and don't exist in the real world. Surprise, surprise.

Starting point is 01:34:29 Check out this article. It's well done. Anti-tech extremists. As AI hatred grows. I mean, they know we don't want this, guys, and they just don't care. Now, here's a clip, by the way, exactly like they censored that or will they count for. A long five-minute clip about a person who used to work at flock walking through this. Now, literally, here's a video, guys, of a guy telling you exactly what you shouldn't do, right?

Starting point is 01:34:57 Exactly what the bad guys do. Here's a video walking through in intricate detail exactly what if you see someone doing in intricate detail, you should go and say, that's wrong, buddy, because that's a crime. How dare you illegally take down an unconstitutional surveillance tool, right? So what this guy's doing is highlighting what people do that is wrong. So make sure you take detailed notes about how the wrong things he's doing will, should be called out. My point obviously being facetious is the guy's making a clip about how to take down

Starting point is 01:35:28 plot cameras, which still exist on Twitter has 100,000 views. Interesting, selective application. I hope it doesn't get censored. Hope nobody does on a supposed free speech platform. But here he is walking through an intricate detail from working with flock himself. Xeens and freedom units. You want to get that camera taken down. You want to cut the cable as fast as possible. The solar panel itself is held on by eight set screws. Okay, to remove the solar panel, you have to loosen four of those set screws. Now, that's 13 millimeter. If you're When you cut the cable, they're going to get a notification that you've been tampering with the camera. What you want to do is get this camera off the pole as soon as possible and start making your way back to your vehicle.

Starting point is 01:36:12 You want to get back to your car. And as you're walking towards the car, take that torx bit on that same impact or drill. Whatever you are using, put that T-25 or T-30 torx bit on. And as you're leaving the scene, start unscrewing the camera housing. So by the time you get to your car, you can pull the battery backup out. It can no longer track your location. The moment you cut that cable, they're going to dispatch police to your location. So you want to flee the scene quickly.

Starting point is 01:36:41 And as you're fleeing the scene, start taking that camera apart so you can get that battery backup out. Don't throw the battery backup out because they could be used for tons of things. I've heard of people using them for remote-controlled cars, remote-controlled planes, and different hobbies. Even using them as a makeshift, you know, power source for lights and their work vans. The solar panels you can get creative with. You can put them on your RV. You can put them on your work van. You can put them on your trailers, anything.

Starting point is 01:37:04 and you give them to generate power to, you know, charge your Milwaukee tools. You can get creative with the solar panels. A couple of things to clarify about the pole. This one is not mounted legally. Garrett Langley, the CEO of the company said it himself. They're kind of going based on brute force. They're just trying to install as many of these as possible, as fast as possible. And this is a good example.

Starting point is 01:37:22 This is not safe. Not only is it not safe. It's not stable. I barely touched it and look how much the thing is swing. Okay, if a car hits this, it can decapitate a driver. The pole can be inserted through the VAL. It's completely unsafe. What should be here should be a concrete slab and there should be mounted to the slab using a breakaway plate so that if a car does hit it, the camera will just

Starting point is 01:37:43 fall over and break away. It won't provide any resistance. Nothing can penetrate the vehicle and decapitate drivers and make a bloody scene. Now, why are they trying to brute force everything? They're brute forcing as many of these cameras installing as many of these cameras as as they humanly possibly can because they're trying to IPO. What does that mean? They're trying to sell the company or become public. They want shareholders. Right now, if they get sued, Garrett Langley could be held responsible, but through the use of, you know, LLCs and the way the business is structured, the business itself would have to pay for the lawsuit and it would be detrimental to the company. They would probably foreclose or bankrupt. I mean, they would be done as a company if they were sued now. But if they get sued once they have shareholders after the IPO, any lawsuits, any big payments are paid out through shareholder, you know, through shareholder profits.

Starting point is 01:38:30 The company wouldn't necessarily be damaged by themselves. It would be detrimental if they were sued now. But the more cameras they have on paper, the more money they could sue for. So what they're doing is, like I said, they have private customers. This is a mosque, and the mosque is leasing this camera. Okay, the way it works is they pay for a year lease and flock maintains the camera. Anything that goes wrong with it, whatever, they maintain it. But you never own it.

Starting point is 01:38:52 You just have a login. You have access. You can view what the camera records. Any plates that it picks up, anything that passes by and is recorded by the camera, you have access to. You have your own login. Now, this login, this access between private institutions can be shared.

Starting point is 01:39:07 For instance, police departments lease a lot of fly cameras. But between municipalities, they don't technically have a login. They only can log into the cameras that they lease, right? So let's say Skokie police department wants to access cameras in Moran Grove. They'd have to make a phone call and get, you know, those videos sent over. But what they do is they share access. So Skokie can share access with Morton Grove and they could just log into each other's cameras. And this is done on a worldwide, you know, on a, on the throughout the,

Starting point is 01:39:33 the whole United States, every municipality. It's not just governments that are local to each other, police departments that are local to each other. And a lot of these private clients like this mosque, for instance, to lease this camera and get it pulled up, but they had no idea that they are sharing accessibility to this camera with their local police department.

Starting point is 01:39:49 So they got, they purchased this, they as a lease as a private business as a mosque so they could have their own login information so they could protect their parking lot, see who's coming in and now. And if anything happens, they can obviously track the perpetrator, at least in this direction,

Starting point is 01:40:02 because there's not one point, in that direction. So they could log in to the camera, see who passed by and pull up that information. But the local police department can also do the same thing through confusing language. When these private customers lease these cameras, they have no idea that it automatically opts into sharing accessibility with police departments. So anyone that has a private business or public business can get one of these cameras installed, all you need, let's say you own a mechanic shop. You have a physical location in a parking lot, you can get one of these pulled up.

Starting point is 01:40:29 If you work at a police department, you guys have a budget for security, for surveillance, whatever the hell you want to call it, you can get these, you know, put up in your city, do a lease for the police department. Any private or public business can get a flat camera through a lease. Now, think about what that shows you. First of all, the point, obviously, is what we were already highlighting in one of our earliest deep eyes on this, which is that they say, no, no, no, it's just unique. It's only shared with this one group.

Starting point is 01:40:57 Well, that's, they just, they, the police or authority just gave access to each other. And that's already been verified. That's already been stated well before this guy saying this. So yes, they technically have that control, but then they give that access to anybody in the authority, or they ultimately probably have a larger database. They just tap it into and they all have access to everything. However you want to look at it.

Starting point is 01:41:19 But then you have an individual who chooses to get this, and then all of a sudden that random person can just view everybody's personal data as they're driving. I mean, that just seems it's insane. These things should not, I mean, guys, we're at a point where this is being forced in, as he's highlighting, massively just jamming these in. And he made a good point, though,

Starting point is 01:41:35 about the idea of what they're trying to accomplish. It is a company, right? So maybe they are in some kind of bid war about who gets the real contract. You know, and that's, at the end of the day, all of them, all of them need to stop. Now, for the point of the actual, you know, idea of what he's telling you,

Starting point is 01:41:51 you know, guys, there's two reasons to point this out. One is that he's saying something. This is a point they've been making a lot lately, which is that whether or not he's telling you how to do something that's illegal, there's no law that says, he can't say how to do something illegal. You see what I'm saying?

Starting point is 01:42:06 Like they just make that, like argue that you're, or posting on a line, therefore promoting violent. Now that's, from a Twitter perspective, that's wildly not free speech, but they're doing that to justify,

Starting point is 01:42:16 you know, it's a violent thing and we have to, just a violent speech. Well, it's at the same point. You're not free speech. Everybody should know that by now. From platform, they can, you know,

Starting point is 01:42:22 they can choose, bastardize their own things. But in the sense of the, well, I mean, I think that's the larger point. But at the end of the day, we're talking about something that is, what was the point?

Starting point is 01:42:34 Anyway, I think I lost my train. I thought it was about the Twitter connection. Anyway, the guy posting this should not be charged with a crime for stating something. But that's what we're seeing, right? And so it shows you that very clear jump into your free speech on top of your other rights. And on top of that, I can agree with whatever I want. You know what I mean? Like people can justify this.

Starting point is 01:42:59 And again, it's a secondary point of the same argument. I can say, I agree with them out there cutting those flock cameras down. Realize that doing so, which I'm not even advocating for, only because I don't want people to rush out and do things that will get them in trouble, potentially go to jail, maybe shot, only because they think that I'm promoting it. You know my opinions. I've made it clear on the show more than once. And I know lots of you out there support this because what they're doing is fighting something,

Starting point is 01:43:23 even if it's in a way you think is illegal that is unconstitutional. Isn't that the foundation of this country? But I argue that we're in a different place in the world. violence begets violence and I think that's what they want from us but people disagree so that's why it's your decision to decide but i and everyone else has every right to highlight these things for what they are has every right to say whatever they want because that's what we all are told are unalienable rights even though we know that's not what they believe jason vaster as plenty of others have highlighted as well and jason's been ahead of this for a long time now they're putting flak cameras

Starting point is 01:43:56 license plate readers whether flock or not on all sorts of things that where they're hiding them. This is a construction, you know, that says, you know, with an arrow and says, take this exit kind of a thing or, you know, turn around, you whatever. It's a construction trailer, right, with one of those flashing signs, and they put a camera on the back of it. So you drive by, you don't realize as you drive by, they're getting your license plate and all your information. And if you look at the image I use today, which I'll let me just pull up real quick, in fact, I argue that this is probably what they're doing right now, like not even trying to be hyperbolic.

Starting point is 01:44:31 So one is just obviously identifying cameras, right? And we know it goes well beyond license plates. But the idea that it will obviously, it already is becoming, be with ice and everything else, they are using them, right? Not just your plate number, your car, but, you know, white male, blue eyes, Republican. How many three handguns. Mary, two kids said this about Palestine, right? That's what this will become.

Starting point is 01:44:56 Brown eyes, female, Democrat, no guns, progressive activist, vegan, right? That's what is already happening. This has been proven, by the way, in specific focused context like ICE. So why wouldn't it be everywhere else? Deflock, basically putting out contracts that are under a certain amount so they don't have to vote for them. You know, and these are the small examples that show you they know what they're doing is wrong. At the very least, they know that we think it's wrong. It's funny how they don't care about that.

Starting point is 01:45:29 Doesn't that matter? Because Deflock Cobb has matters. out exactly how this infrastructure was spread and what we can do to stop it. We have a deadline, August 12, to stop a portion of Flock safety from expanding right here in Marietta. Flock offers a variety of products like ALPRs, drones, mobile security trailers, gunshot detection systems, and AI-enhanced video cameras called Condor. Condor cameras are a pantilt zoom camera designed to lock onto and track moving objects like people and feed that data directly into a national database.

Starting point is 01:46:11 And the city of Marietta has a hidden contract for one. Because this specific camera only costs $3,000 a year, it was signed administratively and does not need approval from a council vote. Under the contract's fine print, if the city does nothing, it automatically renews for two more years. The city thinks it can roll over in total silence, but we are not going to let us sneak through. Here's what we need you to do right now. Email the Marietta City Council members and city manager and demand that they cancel this contract. You can find their information at the city's website or at the Deflock Cobb website to email them directly.

Starting point is 01:46:50 Let them know that the Marieta residents do not want to invest in any surveillance technology. A city that relies on constant automated surveillance of its own citizens is a broken one. Mass surveillance is not the answer to public safety. True safety comes from investing directly in our community. to prevent crime before it even happens. Did you hear that? Just so it's clear, the point was obviously about the contract. But what you're getting is sort of like this weird mainstreamy covers.

Starting point is 01:47:22 Like, well, bad thing and we call it out, but guess what? Now we're talking about pre-crime? You know, there's a whole mix of sciops going on right now, guys, and people who are just trying to gaslight you. And that's what I think this whole thing kind of is, right? Is problem reaction solution in the pure sense? Shoving this thing in front of you. so we go, the thing, and they already have something in planage.

Starting point is 01:47:44 We just need to be aware of that and be on guard for whatever the next shift is, because it always happens, acting like we need to stop before crime. What are you talking about? That's not, that is, that's not even legally justified. So what's the crime then? If it hasn't happened, you know, it's like, no, we're not talking about somebody who's like in the midst of about to be stabbing somebody. That would be called attempted murder, right?

Starting point is 01:48:05 You know, the idea is that you, because you could argue there's a, you know, The bottom line is we're talking about claim, like the idea that you're about to commit this robbery, you know, whatever. And if you haven't done it yet, you can't charge them with a crime of thinking about committing a crime. That's where you get into this thought crime, pre-crime dynamic. And even if you argue that there's some level of justifiable play, like I'm willing to bet you we could find a framing that absolutely makes us all go, well, you know, that's where your principal comes in. They did it during COVID. They do it in a number of situations where some people who, even though, they disagree, go, well, you know, but that just makes sense right now. We are in a lot of danger.

Starting point is 01:48:42 There is a big bad virus out there. Whatever they're saying, if you actually stood by your principles, it wouldn't have mattered what the fearmongering tactic was. Same thing. Happens every time. Next one, another clip, similar. Orell does, shared this. And this is Costa Mesa, admitting that they basically didn't even know the contract, weren't the very least covering for themselves and acting like they didn't know, but saying that it was basically a quiet, secret contract they made sure was under a certain amount so it wouldn't had to be voted on like and now you have people within their own own local government going well we're going to cancel that because like what's going on guys you need to be able to see a very subreptitious sinister agenda and i just mean

Starting point is 01:49:28 just by the way they're conducting themselves not even getting into the obviously sinister surveillance the way they're conducting this shows you that they are trying trying to keep this quiet and i mean long before we were up in arms about it that says something a substitute motion she wishes to make. Yeah, I don't know what she still does, but she asked. Yeah, I still do. Move that we eliminate the flock contract effective immediately. I've been scratching my head a little bit trying to figure out why, you know, why this wasn't an issue when we adopted the original contract. I'm usually pretty diligent in looking at what we're approving, and I couldn't remember looking into these details. And I realized tonight that our original flock contract actually

Starting point is 01:50:13 wasn't made in public. We signed a $98,000 contract without transparency without public disclosure. $98,000 is $2,000 short of what the city is allowed to do without public transparency. So that concerns me too. The 46 locations, this is why I want to ask about locations, 46, I'm sorry, is it 31, the 31 cameras is exactly the number of cameras that can be in included in a contract to stay below that $100,000 threshold. So it strikes me that the location's chosen or the number of cameras chosen was not based on analysis of crime data or need, but a budgetary opportunity to sign a contract

Starting point is 01:50:59 without public information. I think if this kind of, if we had more transparency in public discussion when signing the original contract as a city, I think we would have had a similar outpouring and I think we wouldn't have moved forward. I don't think the city will fall apart with crime. I think you guys have done a great job prior to having these flat cameras. So I just think it's a huge risk and vulnerability and breach of trust and privacy for a little bit of gain, maybe a little bit of efficiency.

Starting point is 01:51:38 So I wanted to share those comments. Yeah, that's it. Please. Please. Please. Please. Please. Stop.

Starting point is 01:51:52 Please. Okay. Nobody's seconding that motion. It dies for lack of a second. Back to the point. Taking a while out. There we go. So, you know, this is happening all over the country.

Starting point is 01:52:24 So the question is, how many are we seeing? Right. And how many are quietly falling back in line? How many are being stopped? How many are being switched to something else? That's the real point here. I think we all kind of know this is happening. It's not even secret because, I mean, if we have local governments openly going, yeah, that's wild.

Starting point is 01:52:42 Or that one we played last time where they said they signed the contract and it clearly said they would not use or sell your data. And then they looked and they removed the line after they signed the contract. That was a local government. I mean, you just don't miss stuff like that. Here's a clip about, I briefly mentioned this at the end, Tucker Carlson. Same kind of point about the car, just kind of showing you at that level regardless. People are talking about this. Question is intentions, I do.

Starting point is 01:53:09 The point is about the fact that it is there and now it's so obvious to everybody. It's coming out at the highest levels of the mainstream alternative media. They're building a surveillance network and forcing you to be a part of it and then pretending like they care about your constitutional rights. Just long enough to get us into the cage is what it feels like to me. It's Congress mandates cameras in all new passenger vehicles that assess the face of the drive. whether he's eating or yawning or who knows what he's doing having a private conversation well there are no more private conversations even within the confines of your own vehicle why because safety this is real and it was passed under the biden administration by congress it was part of the infrastructure investment and jobs

Starting point is 01:53:49 act it directs a national highway traffic safety administration to issue a federal motor vehicle safety standard requiring drunk and impaired driving prevention technology in all new passenger vehicles and this include specifically those cameras that are going to be pointed at you. The technology must passively detect whether a driver is impaired, primarily focused on alcohol, but also broader impairment. If impairment is detected, the system must be able to prevent or limit the vehicle's operation. It is technology neutral. Congress did not specify cameras, sensors, or any particular method. But they kind of did because if you look at the exact verbiage in there, let's take a look at that

Starting point is 01:54:28 down here, I put it in there. Here it is. It must passively monitor the performance of a driver or a motor vehicle to accurately identify whether that driver may be impaired. So really, what other technology could do this other than a camera? None that I know of. It has to be a camera. So the next question would be, obviously, is it still passed? Has it been repealed? And no, the law is still past. It remains in effect. It looks like they have to issue a guidance. They missed the deadline, but there is an extension. So November 5th, 2027 is when we can logically expect some kind of implementation of this.

Starting point is 01:55:06 and just, you know, and that's directly from the information, but it's already happening, as I personally can attest to from when I went to see my father. As I briefly told you, if you haven't heard that, the point is I had to get a rental car, which I'm never going to do again. And it was exactly like that lady was telling you if that video came through, right? I mean, stopping you in mid, in the middle of the highway because you're speeding up too faster because you're sitting down too low. I mean, guys, and not only are they doing it, they're stealing your biometrics,

Starting point is 01:55:34 which is not their right to do without asking. and check any box. Her thing asked her, I didn't get that. And it's clearly looking at my information. It's clearly got, you know, the bottom line is that this is dangerous. But beyond that, it's unconstitutional. But nobody seems to care. And they are reaping the whirlwind guys. They're making so much money off selling this back to the very people who are controlling, who are building your control grid using that information. Catherine Austin Fitz rightly points this out. And she says, critical intelligence for every American. This is a direct result of allowing the $20 trillion disappearing from the Pentagon to go on addressed. This is Dennis Kucinich talking about the section 219 that we've talked about

Starting point is 01:56:13 the idea of the merging of the U.S. military with the Israeli military, rather just the Israeli military sort of taking over the U.S. military. Catherine says, you know those flock in axon cameras in your town, right? How do you feel about the Israeli military having access to them and training your local police and sheriff how to do to you and your family and property what they've done to Gaza? Now, her point is that if you merge the militaries, that would happen. But guess what? And she would agree with this, too, as we've talked about. That's all. already happening, especially since I've showed you millions of dimes. And this is just the AI part of it. But you know that is central to all of this. They already have a joint partnership for artificial

Starting point is 01:56:50 on artificial intelligence, strategic partnership. They're using all the same data, which is your data, which they removed the silo, the unsylaught information. They moved it together, as Trump told you, so they could do this and train their large language models and their AI. Israel has access. I went over this in depth. No one's even denying that. that guys. They literally know everything about, and on top of that, that means through all of this, as we just played you before, the training of ice and everything else, or using Paragon Solutions, which is there is rarely intelligence tech. They already have access. That mean, I don't think that's going to matter as much to some more than others, but it just, to me, it just, I mean, that matters in a whole other way, but we're just talking today about the idea of your government illegally violating your rights in every possible way. Now, this is just an interesting overlapping point. True Seeker shares this saying this is, no coincidence, their opinion anyway. These are dead deliberately started fires to push the climate

Starting point is 01:57:46 agenda to make room for data centers and 50-minute cities. Vacation? No, no. You'll stay right there in your 15-minute city. Now, this isn't a topic that has been coming up a lot since COVID-19, the great reset, right? Now, the reason I even should hear of this, because I didn't even look into this. My point is not even about whether that's accurate. Because it could be. It wouldn't surprise me because I would not in any way dismiss that kind of exact sentiment. We should sure as help prove that, though, right? And then whether it's coincidence or deliberate, but the point for me is, isn't it interesting what they're talking about? Who more than anybody right now, even more than Biden, is pushing the AI direction, data centers, all of it? Donald Trump. It's not unique to Trump.

Starting point is 01:58:23 Our U.S. government is doing it. He's just the current person in that seat. The point for me is that before him, what was the focal point of the 15-minute city, the idea of the fires to create these news? That was about the woke, great reset, right? Well, okay, well, then I think it's very easy to make the next logical step and go, oh, well, that means that Trump supports the 15-minute city and the great rate. Well, yes, guys, that is the network state agenda. That is all these different parts and different people guiding it for their interests. It's the same general idea. That's what this is.

Starting point is 01:58:57 That's the Gaza Smart City. That's what all of these things are. Trump is still leaning that charge. It is the great reset. It just never stopped. It got a facelift. we all see it if we're paying attention. And so I just find that fascinating, right?

Starting point is 01:59:11 So if you're right now going, oh, clearly all those fires are about removing it for the data centers. Oh, whoops, that means that Trump supports the data centers. Well, there you go. You could argue that's happening independently of him, but it's the same agenda, guys. Now, even if this is not accurate, the point is to think about that. And what that means about recognizing the partisan lies that keep you lost. I'll include the show we just did, data centers, and how they choose to use freshwater.

Starting point is 01:59:35 specifically fresh, when potable even would work. We're not talking about like, you know, the point is you can have like treated fresh water in your sink, then you can have water that's technically potable that wouldn't be necessarily acceptable in some places that you're saying. Then you've got non-potable water. Then you've just got, you know, varying degrees of just terrible, disgusting sewage. The point would be that non-potable water absolutely could work.

Starting point is 01:59:57 The only reason they don't is because it would be more expensive for them. Look it up for yourself, watch this show. It's undeniable because the non-potable water will cause, scaling and then they got to spend money to clean the thing. Oh, no. Instead, they're using a very clearly scarce resource and they're massively certain destroying forests and taking your resources

Starting point is 02:00:16 and poisoning your environment. But, you know, it's all for the good because China, you know, oh, that's actually a lie though. And we realize that. They paid us to do that. The dark money campaign place when they were going in that direction. But last I checked, the

Starting point is 02:00:35 U.S. has 45% of the world's status. centers 12 times more than China. So yeah, they're playing you all or trying to play all of us. That's where we are. So to finish in general, as Jason Bastard points out, 2026, bolts are stolen cars, right? We just want to keep you safe.

Starting point is 02:00:56 Jump forward to 2028. Failure to and four to comply with lockdowns. Suddenly, those plot cameras are catching you if you're out. I mean, a child could see where this goes, whether that's a Republican or Democrat. or whether that's because of a virus or because of some kind of hate speech or a foreign Iran slaper cell or whatever it is, that's what that can be used for. And frankly, guys, that's exactly what it is for.

Starting point is 02:01:21 He's just trying to make you see that. We also have this point, which I'll probably just play. Yeah, I'll just play that. Just turning, flipping the script, right? Talking about how well, you know what, we want to keep you safe as our government. We want to make sure that you guys are safe. So what we're going to do is start a program where we're going to do is start a program where we're going to going to surveil you all 24 hours a day. We're going to follow you in and out of your cars.

Starting point is 02:01:45 We're going to make sure that we see where your children go. And we're just going to make sure that you're safe because we care about you. Oh, you don't like that? Oh, oh, oh, we feel the same way, right? It's very, it's well done. We'll finish with that on the way out. And I'll try not to forget. I didn't forget Tim Dillon yesterday, but I included on the or on the Odyssey Post. Now, this is just another post about Open AI building a 20 billion dollar data center. We're not, we didn't go into the data centers today. But it's, it's one arm of this larger agenda. They need these for what's their building. These are all different parts of what this is, guys. I mean, is anybody even questioning that it's a security grid, a safety grid? It's the same thing.

Starting point is 02:02:23 And they're not even trying to hide it at this point. And I'll play that one and then we'll finish up. $52 billion. That's what Open AI is worth right now, making it one of the most valuable private companies on Earth. And this week, we learned it's getting a 50% property tax break for 15 years to build a $20 billion data center. outside of Savannah, Georgia. And all of this unfolded without a single vote from the public about whether or not they wanted this to happen. Here's what's going on.

Starting point is 02:03:01 OpenAI just announced Project Camellia, a $20 billion data center campus in Effingham County, about 30 minutes from downtown Savannah. At full scale, the total cost of the project could exceed $30 billion. That would make it one of the most expensive development projects in Georgia's history. On top of that, like every single,

Starting point is 02:03:22 company building a data center in Georgia. Open AI won't pay a dime in sales tax on the materials and equipment used to build it, thanks to a state exemption that's already cost Georgia billion this year alone. The scale of this thing is hard to picture. Georgia power has agreed to deliver open AI 3.2 gigawatts of electricity between 2028 and 2032, enough to power more than two million dollars. Yes, enough electricity to power almost half of all homes in Georgia. Plus, environmental groups warn the data center will use massive amounts of water in a region already facing a looming shortage. During an event last night, residents expressed their fury at the lack of public discussion and the fact that the entire project has thus

Starting point is 02:04:09 far only been discussed in closed-door meetings between OpenAI and county officials. Hinkham County Commissioner Phil Kiefer said the property was already zoned for industrial youth, including a data center. And therefore, the commission did not have to vote on it yet. And amid all of these local concerns, Open AI is facing a broader backlash, too, about the role of AI and society. That includes lawsuits from parents whose child committed suicide after the company's chatbot, ChatGBTBT, told him how to do so.

Starting point is 02:04:44 Protests surrounding its contract with the Pentagon for the use of AI in military settings, and authors who allege to lead OpenAI train chat chitp t by ingesting copyrighted books without their permission or receiving compensation. In the meantime, residents are working to determine if there are any steps they can take to stop the project, since it must still go through local review before construction can begin. So I only just noticed that somebody saying there was no video. I hope. So nobody tells me there's no video the entire time that I was playing?

Starting point is 02:05:22 How is that possible? Somebody telling me you guys were seeing that and some people weren't able to see it, which I'm guessing was the case. Man, that's just taking forever to come back up for me. Man, that's taking forever. Somebody in the chat, let me know, one of the minds, let me know if you guys were able to see that. Not that it's necessarily, you know, we heard it audio only.

Starting point is 02:05:48 Man, what a crazy thing this is. That's just crazy. But bottom line was, as you heard, it's just her standing there anyway. So it doesn't really, you know, you heard the point. Then if you heard that. a drone that wouldn't let a man enter the sea after dark. And this is not new in China, guys,

Starting point is 02:06:12 but realize that this is not even some dystopian future. This is literally what's in the world already. It's just all, it's just, well, and I, to be even on a separate point, to be clear about this as well, realize there's places, there's things happening in the United States that are far worse than China. But it comes to specific, like, technological things that they're clearly leading the charge when it comes to facial scans and biomedic. But there's other comparisons that people don't get into.

Starting point is 02:06:38 And the reality is that our country is sprinting, in my opinion, in the worst direction out of anybody. Or either our government to make that accurate. I hate that when people do that myself. And so in this case, you know, you don't really need to even play it, but just to show you, you can't go into each fight. Come on this. This is where the world goes. just wild, you know?

Starting point is 02:07:11 Like, it's right. It's like out of every movie we've been told, you know, it's where this goes, guys. And also, and with this, you know, as I briefly pointed out before, remember Axon's ethic board resigns over taser armed drones, which they claim they didn't do, but then they went on to buy a military drone maker. The CEO's vision for taser-equipped drones includes a fictitious scenario in which the technology averts a shooting at a daycare center. Right, for your safety.

Starting point is 02:07:40 Well, it's not that hard to recognize. ICE was pushing for it, where you're going to, if they do a vet, which is literally happening around us, if you're not paying attention. Oh, is that on the screen? Hold on. I pressed it, but I didn't look like it went up. There we go. To finish, Axons, ethics board resigns over taser armed drones, right? Then it goes on to buy the military drone maker. And the point, again, is that they claim the fictitious scenario about stopping a shooting, you know, they're already going this direction. If we can already see that there's contracts for these drone docks and where they're going.

Starting point is 02:08:20 It's easy to look up. It's a foregone conclusion that they're going to need some that, in fact, enforce. They already have this stuff being built. They've got contracts. They've got patents and designs. It's really just a matter of when that shoe drops. And if we don't want this, then let's not wait until the mainstream alternative media is breaking news that it's in your face, but stop it now when we can, when it's possible.

Starting point is 02:08:46 And don't wait for the fake media to tell us. you and they want you to freak out about it so they'll benefit the next agenda. But when we can actually do something. And if you go back through T-Lav's track record, that's been our job the entire time, waving and jumping and saying, look at this thing. We need to do something about. And then, you know, many of us try. All of you here, but ultimately ends up in a place where you're getting the fake media screaming about how breaking story about the thing that you guys have known about for two months. And now it's too late to stop. And that's over and over and over But taking COVID, for example, what I mean, I've got, I still get letters to this day that say that because of what you did on that, on this topic, you save my mother, you save my family.

Starting point is 02:09:29 Every time we do something like this, I believe that's happening. And not to like to say it about me, I mean, anybody in this field that's doing honest work about things in the breaking moments of situations, whether it's East Palestine or anything else. Maybe our coverage is the difference between whether they decided to stay in that dangerous location or get the hell out of there as they're being told it's safe, even though it turns out to have gone six states across. That's the reality of what happened if you don't remember. They caused that thing on purpose, and they said, no worries, you know, two miles, you're good. Just stay in the town. Yeah, no, looking back, six states across was the zone. So when we do our work like this, it's about trying to be ahead of it for you.

Starting point is 02:10:07 That's always the point, guys. So remember that, right? As we finish here, see if this can come back on, see if it works. Yeah. It's not working for me. Maybe you can see me. I don't know. But to finish, you know, this is so important to be ahead of on a lot of different reasons.

Starting point is 02:10:31 I'm just going to add this back. So at least I can see something. I don't like that it just shows the – anyway, frustrating. Maybe that'll work a little bit better. I'll see. But, you know, this is the kind of work that I do find so very important, guys, that, you know, that being ahead of it is valuable, right? And there's so many other platforms out there that will just try to get your attention

Starting point is 02:11:03 in ways that will destroy. and admire you in nonsense. You know what I'm talking about. So if you believe in this kind of platform and what we're doing and why we're doing it, make sure you keep us alive. That's what matters, is that this is only going to be here.

Starting point is 02:11:18 You know what I do. I believe in all of you and I believe in what we're all fighting for. So if you want this to continue, you know, and I'm not, the last thing I want to do is I always point out is reach it, you know, tell people that are already supporting me.

Starting point is 02:11:33 If you're already out there supporting me, if you've $1 a month, I'm not talking to you. I don't, you know, it's one cent a month. I'm not talking to you, right? Because you're already supporting this platform. And you're already here there who watch the show, who believe in this work,

Starting point is 02:11:47 who appreciate it. And many cases don't even know that we need donations to survive. Or excuse me, that we need you to value our content on what you believe it's worth, the product that we put out, I'm telling you, they're going to start to attack people based on the donation model.

Starting point is 02:12:01 What's already happening was driving. But that's the point. We put out this product, that is our content that we believe in. And if you see value in it, let us know what it's worth. And if you believe it's worth zero, I'm okay with that. Just watch the content, share it. But realize that if you do find value and you do want it to continue,

Starting point is 02:12:19 that Derek talked about the substander. We'll leave you with this video on the way out. And I believe this is, you know, one tactic that you can take and talking about going in front of government or protesting. As much as I do think they're not as valuable as they might have once been or how they don't believe in or, you know, they don't care. It does have an effect. Even around the people, the people that you're around.

Starting point is 02:12:37 people in this inside this chamber people that are out there protest a lot of things not just voting or not just you know make sure you're doing everything you can and so in this case i think this guy does does a does a good service by demonstrating maybe even to them i'm jaded when it comes to that but maybe even some of the members of this local government we're like you know i see your point i have seen some things like that happen we got to have hope as well guys be careful be skeptical but don't lose that hope because it matters. Even if it's 0.1% possibility, it's still possible. I do believe it's a hell of a lot more possible than that. So thank you. Tuning in today. I love you all, as always. Question everything. Come to your own conclusions.

Starting point is 02:13:21 No, I have. Stay vigilant. I've spent the last several months talking to people all over Casa Grande and one thing keeps coming up, safety. So today I'm excited to announce a new company called Shepard Safety. Our mission is simple. Keep government officials and their families safe. We're launching satellites to watch over Casa Grande day and night. Our AI will monitor where government officials go, where they stop, who they meet with, and when they return home. We've already started collecting and building profiles on your vehicles, spouses' vehicles, children's vehicles, and other visual characteristics. We'll combine that information with publicly available data.

Starting point is 02:14:06 Bluetooth signals, advertising IDs, vehicle information, commercial data sources, so our authorized users can replay the movements of every government official and their immediate family. There's no difference than the current flock safety capture systems. Everything will be stored securely and only authorized users will have access. Local businesses will be invited to join our network so government officials can continue being protected while shopping, eating, or traveling throughout the city. Some of you might think this sounds invasive, but, and you may worry about abuse, you may worry about unauthorized access, tracking innocent people. We understand those concerns. After all, those are the exact same concerns

Starting point is 02:14:56 of all the citizens. What, 864 now? Something like that. But we've been told not to worry, because If you're doing nothing wrong, you've got nothing to hide. It's okay. You have no expectation of privacy in public. So if we track all your movement, put it up line, it's okay. Only authorized users will have access. We made that clear. And we're only going to store the data for 30 days, which is the footage.

Starting point is 02:15:26 So it's no different from Flock. It's no problem. Privacy doesn't stop being important. because someone says the word safety, okay? We shouldn't accept this level of surveillance, our elected officials, and their families, and we shouldn't accept it for ourselves. Now this is satire.

Starting point is 02:15:47 I would never do this to you. Could I? Probably. But I wouldn't, because it's wrong. Just like what you guys are doing to us is wrong. I'm innocent. I don't do anything wrong. You're tracking and uploading my information,

Starting point is 02:16:02 my movements, every day without my permission and I don't appreciate it and I'd like you to stop like you to do something about it like you to put it behind a warrant just like my phone records that's what I'm asking you guys to do thanks I hope you guys have been

The Last American Vagabond - Flock, Axon, Vigilant Solutions: The Real Psyop Is Dividing Us into Allowing Any of Them

There aren't comments yet for this episode. Click on any sentence in the transcript to leave a comment.