The Last American Vagabond - Flydubai Narrative Falls Apart In Real-Time & Trump FBI Frames Autistic Man As Right-Wing Terrorist

Starting point is 00:00:01 It starts with a simple question and ends in objective reality. Through our journey from there to here, we find one another and ourselves. And as the next 24 hours breaks free from our last, we gaze onward in reflection of the day. Tell me your own conclusion, you're only, please. Welcome to the daily wrap up. Friday, October 2nd, 2026. Thank you for joining me today. Follow up on the fly to buy story, which is outstandingly obvious.

Starting point is 00:00:51 It's very interesting in the development of all these different chaotic stories and how increasingly obvious they seem to be getting. I wanted to make sure we followed up on that. Saw how uniquely obvious it really is throughout this. I mean, it's not just the Iran war and post-October. or seventh propaganda, there's something uniquely, I mean, there's a reason people are asking whether we're supposed to be seeing it this way and whether it's almost something that's driving a larger agenda, which is something that I think about often, as I know you guys know,

Starting point is 00:01:19 about whether this is driving the larger kind of transition we're seeing in the world today. You know, different individual series of events, not just this one thing, but any number of small stories and events and narratives that drive this all in a clear direction. I want to also talk about a story that's by no means new, obviously. It's something that's been talked about for quite a while post-January 6th. And we'll really, you know, after the investigation and the arrest, and that has to do with Brian Cole Jr. Now, I've talked about this here and there more than once, but I haven't really done, you know, it's there's so many, so many things going on.

Starting point is 00:01:54 It's hard to cover all the different things that are important. This one is something I've referenced, I've pointed to. The evidence is there. I think it's a very clear story, but I wanted to make a point on this today, not just because of the story itself being necessary to relay. It breaks my heart, to be honest, when you go through the story, because we've talked about this before. That's why I framed it the way I did in the title today. The idea, you know, before being sort of, you know, the left, trying to frame the right, and, you know, we've grown beyond the illusion of the two-party illusion. But thinking about it

Starting point is 00:02:27 today in the context of Trump's FBI, if you still happen to see it that way, we're going. way framing what is essentially what they you know a right wing terrorist is the way that this is being framed not saying it that way but of course the reality of the story and the evidence is quite different now why is that happening and the real point is hopefully you know that i hope people will take from it the main point is that it's not about left and right it's not about this internal left right political game it's about the government and how it applies its power in your life and what we're watching here is this willingness to just sabotage anything i mean more than we ever seen, by the way, with the current administration, with what's going on a foreign policy,

Starting point is 00:03:05 which I do think is relevant. Something's different. But either way, whether you agree with that or not, recognizing that this is, you know, Americans need to come to terms with what we're actually dealing with in this power structure. So too, honestly, I think every society government is the problem. You know I think that. But in this conversation for Americans, if we believe we can change it from within, the point

Starting point is 00:03:29 is to first and foremost see that it's not about fighting one. side, one political group versus the other, that the entirety of the situation is a problem. And things like this show you that. So we'll go through the abuse of that power, the false flag element that exists within that, you know, however you want to frame that. And then the larger story about Israel, Iran, and fly Dubai and why that fits into all of this and some updates on Iran and what's happening within that. we've been covering stuff like this quite a long time. And this, it's the way I'm, the way I kind of sit with this right now is there's probably

Starting point is 00:04:04 probably plenty of other possible ways to look at it. But it's either something that I think that people are, it's some level wants to be seen. And that doesn't mean everybody involved, driving this into a clear position to then justify on the reaction to it. Very classic tactic or the, the U.S. power structure, the Israeli power structure, have for whatever reason over the process of so many decades just gotten, you know, I mean, incompetent is an easy word there, but there's something more than that. We're watching some kind of degradation, if that's what's happening. Just look at the current reality of this administration and look back, you know,

Starting point is 00:04:38 and it's kind of like a decreasing level of decorum seriousness, not as if those things mean good or bad, right? Like I can point to Obama and his, you know, demeanor that made people feel very comfortable and he just more criminal the terrible like any number of the rest of them conducted the same things with a different framing and so it's important to see that today it's gotten more obvious it's gotten more bombastic now maybe that's about driving us into a place where we accept something more authoritarian either way i just want you to consider that because obviously there is a change happening here and i want to start with this story about brian cool and you know and it deserves to be discussed in depth i mean at least to the depth we're going to do today and this is not even

Starting point is 00:05:21 remotely as in depth as it should be, but it's one story I want to discuss today. The point is it's a story that does deserve your attention. What I'm going to do is go through the actual court documents in two different cases and show you the things I think that are important for the comments he's making here. Hopefully we'll trigger you to look through in the, you know, the entirety of the story, which we've been covering and kind of piecemeal since it started. But I wanted to start here. This is one of the older ones from March 23rd, over a million views, you know, on this

Starting point is 00:05:46 platform anyway, very, you know, viral, if you will, whatever that means today. in the AI deep fake world we live in, not to suggest fake anything here, but just meaning that, you know, I don't think we can take a face value what we see in the engagement with these platforms anymore, as if it's even the real numbers

Starting point is 00:06:01 or whether or not it's even the reach that it implies, you know, on and on. Anyway, Thomas Massey, March 23rd, I believe FBI arrested the wrong person in the January 6th pipe bomb case, opposed to a blaze article, which got all sorts of attacks from the corporate media.

Starting point is 00:06:15 I have my, you know, mixed feelings about most of these mainstream platforms. It's not about the platform that doesn't matter, but it's about the facts and the evidence and you verifying it for yourself. Analysis indicates stark physical differences between Cole and the hoodie suspect. Simple. Just in and of itself, on the surface level, that there's a different, as he frames it, physical differences, stark physical differences.

Starting point is 00:06:38 So body structure, different things that stand out as anomalies. Alone, maybe shadows, film, lighting, you know, possible, right? Including the manner of the walking body shape, the gate that they then, scientifically showed was different. Body shape, features, eye size, shoe size, neck length, you know, minor things, apparently according to the FBI. So please look into this.

Starting point is 00:07:02 What we're going to get into now, as we've covered before, in this part from going forward, this is posted from the 30th. Steve Baker's been doing an investigation on this. He says, I have vacillated between tears and anger this morning while finally reading the transcript, which recently came out, of what FBI put Brian Cole Jr. through

Starting point is 00:07:19 on the morning of December 4th. I sincerely hope Dan Bongino and Cash Patel burn in whatever eternal punishment is the opposite of Cash's beloved Valhalla. So I'm going to go through that in a second. Thomas Massey says most of the country has been ignoring this story. And you could argue, I do think a lot of people are deliberately ignoring it. But for example, I'm not ignoring this story. Now I'm not suggesting it themed at me.

Starting point is 00:07:42 My point is there's a lot of us out there that are just overwhelmed with an incredible amount of things going on. I think that's by design, quite frankly. so we don't point to things like this. Or some of us do not, and maybe not entirely at all, right? Most of the country's ignoring the story. When it's finally resolved,

Starting point is 00:07:57 he says Cash Patel must resign and join Dan Bongino. What the two of, and by the way, as many in the comments below, and you know I agree, resign, that's the level of this, but, you know, I'm not, maybe that's where you start. My point is it should be much more than resignation.

Starting point is 00:08:14 In history, that's what you get, is politicians that go, I quit, in disgrace, and we go, oh, he was held accountable instead of going, but what about the crime he committed? You know, I make the joke about us. Can I break the law and just go, I quit my job? And then I guess that resolves the problem, right?

Starting point is 00:08:30 It's just interesting and it shows you a, you know, rule for the, not for me, kind of a thing, like the discrepancy between the upper and the lower that they get away with it because they get just embarrassed as if that's enough. Look at Fauci, all pouty by his trash can. Oh, as Tucker said, he's going to be held. come on guys how can that be the reality that we're good with him just being upset about his reputation being tarnished probably knew that would happen at the end of the day anyway i digress

Starting point is 00:08:57 the point here is that realizing we need more than that if what he's saying is true and i agree that it is these people should be charged with i mean at the very least i guess what fraud or what would it be what would you call that from within you know malfeasance at the very least from a government position lying about this story to get a win so you and Dan could pretend like you guys weren't floundering sophomore people that didn't know what they were doing and that became clear very quickly he goes at a minimum they should release coal on an ankle bracelet until the trial the reason i mean that's that would seem pretty customary especially since he's innocent until proven guilty right and even the i mean typically when you have a case with are held until trial

Starting point is 00:09:40 it's the case of a flight risk or somebody who's violent. None of those apply. Maybe because they don't want this person being talked to. They don't want there being more information coming out. He says, what the two of them have done, this autistic blackmail is inexcusable. So you can decide for yourself. So he shows Mr. Cole breaks, a section that I want to show you. Before that, here's the entire document. And this specifically is not the, this is a response, as I understand it, coming from the defense. But so it's not the entire picture, but just it's their framing of it. That's fair to. say, but it's important to hear. So here's what I highlighted on this one. It's just, so it's really

Starting point is 00:10:15 just introduction down to collapse. I'll read it on here. Okay. Down to here. Okay. So on the introduction, it says on the morning, I mean, I guess I could just read this first part too, since that's all there is to defendant Brian Cole Jr. respectfully moves to suppress all statements that he made during December 4th, 2025 custodial interrogation at the FBI's Washington field office. A transcript of the video recorded interrogation is attached. And then it says as Mr. Cole will automatically file the video interrogation. Okay, introduction. Yeah, I guess it wasn't necessarily adding much on the morning of December 4th, 2025.

Starting point is 00:10:55 Brian Cole woke up early, like always, and walked out of his house to buy food at a 7-Eleven. He found FBI agents pointing guns at him. Roughly three hours into the interrogation it followed, isolated in an interview room, wrapped in a blanket, fighting the urge to vomit and stimming, because he He's an autistic, high-level autistic man, or like, you know, at level one, I guess is the, well, I take that back because I forgot to go for, level one for you guys that know deeper on whether the point, as I understand it is he's, you know, as they describe in this document, I guess, just visibly identified as autistic, but they then confirmed it nonetheless.

Starting point is 00:11:32 So in this case, stimming, you know, whereas basically, if you guys don't know this, you know, kind of usually like kind of a rocking motion, repeating some kind of a sentiment. and it's something that I understand it helps them find center, calm down. You know, everything is overwhelming is what people understand they're dealing with. Too much overwhelming sensations or statements or feelings, and that's a way for them to try to focus that. And so that's where he is, stimming, and it says the same sentences to himself, repeating them again and again.

Starting point is 00:12:01 We're going to get into what that is. He agreed with two agents insisting that the figure in some surveillance video was him. the government will call that a voluntary confession. Now remember, this is the defense writing this. The video and transcript record, video and transcript record record. So if you don't understand the story, the point is that he confessed, right? That's what we're being told. He admitted he was there.

Starting point is 00:12:24 That was him. They show the methodical dismantling of a man whose autism spectrum disorder left him unable to withstand the psychologically coercive tactics deployed against him. and who told the agents so in real time while they pressed him, told him his professions, his profession, him professing his innocence was a criminal act and threatened to drag his family through the same experience Mr. Cole had gone through that morning.

Starting point is 00:12:52 The morning that started at gunpoint at the Supreme, and remember this is as an autistic person that the argument is, and you should question that too, I believe it's pretty clear this person is autistic, is that this is somebody who is, you know, you can be overwhelmed with too much going on. And so that could make your mind essentially break down and just go into some, as they'll describe in here. But what they're saying is that ultimately, you know, with the threats of you being, and saying that you saying the thing you said was a crime in and of itself,

Starting point is 00:13:21 ends up confusing the way that you perceive that. So now you're not supposed to say that I didn't do that because now that's a crime. Like if you work someone in a position where they are vulnerable, especially someone like this. Again, this is the argument that that is something that can be abused. Now, realistically, tactics like this are used every single day,

Starting point is 00:13:39 and police will admit that, especially when you start to overlap who trains this when you get into the reality, not the lie, the provable reality of IDF and Israeli influence and the obvious growth in those tactics throughout our enforcement arm over the last so many decades.

Starting point is 00:13:53 And that includes false confessions, coercion, torture. We've seen this. And I'm not suggesting here in torture, who knows, but coercion, and very clear manipulation. As the Supreme Court has long recognized in weighing whether the government can carry its burden in showing statements are voluntary, courts must consider whether their admission would be compatible with a system that presumes innocence and assures that a conviction will not be secured by inquisitorial means, essentially meaning whether by violence or threats or torture or not, that you can simply batter somebody down over a long period of time before they essentially just acquies. men, you can include torture and threats and pressure.

Starting point is 00:14:34 And historically, that's why this exists, because people can be pressured. Even people can be using intelligence, manipulate the way you perceive. Not somebody in autistic, just somebody who can be tricked into saying a thing that then gets used against them. Lawyers will tell you this is something they're trained on in cases like this. Now, it says here, it would not, meaning this wouldn't apply. Voluntariness turns on two questions. whether he was voluntarily giving this information, whether the agent's conduct was objectively coercive,

Starting point is 00:15:07 and whether that conduct, in fact, overboard the defendant's will. It's pretty simple, right? And so that's up to the judge to decide if you can read, and it's very coercive, and then decide whether or not autistic, and that does play a factor that's simply the fact that they continue to do this for so long caused that person to overboard their will is what it writes. And it lists plenty of citations. The answer to the first question fills 90 pages of the transcript.

Starting point is 00:15:33 The agents told Mr. Cole their evidence was overwhelming and that his pleas can't convince us of his innocence. They told him his maintaining. Now, this is also interesting, by the way. When you come at a point where you're arguing, we live in a system where you're innocent to proven guilty and that we're supposed to argue in an altruistic view, these people are not there to make him the victim, make him the person who did it, but rather to suss out whether that is the case. right so he's a suspect right so for to pretend this is the way the system works you would believe that these good-natured and altruistic FBI agents are there to make sure or not not just to railroad in the thing they already think but let's be honest guys even with good intention if you want to

Starting point is 00:16:16 frame it that way that is the way this tends to work they get a they get a hold of something and they want to see it through now that can drive people i mean weirdly this is making me think overlapped with the medical stuff I'm dealing with. It's cancer. It's cancer. And they find either way. The point is that you can see a way in which that can happen, not even necessarily like malicious, even though it's pretty gross that as an agent, you'd be able to see that you're just choosing to focus, you know, tunnel vision on one thing. But so back to the point, the agent told them the evidence was overwhelming. You can't convince us of your innocence when that when at this moment, that was not the case. It was, it was largely subjective. It's the point in which they get

Starting point is 00:16:55 him to say this, which I'll go into you right now, where they then say, now we got you, right? So it's the lying. You can't convince us you're innocent. We already know, why would you do that? Of course, from a game of playing that they're the good guys fighting, you could pretend they did it just to see if he would admit it. But this gets, at the end of the day, you're guilty until proven innocent in their minds.

Starting point is 00:17:15 That's how the system works. Let's not lie to ourselves. Continuing, and says they told him his, him maintaining his innocence was another crime. Now, think about how that would manipulate somebody who, might not be the clearest. That simply, well, you saying that is a crime. So right there, now you're in trouble. Now, maybe an average person might go, well, that's just dumb.

Starting point is 00:17:35 You're lying to me. But somebody who's already vulnerable, somebody who's autistic, somebody who's struggling to keep their mind because of all the overwhelming things happening might feel like suddenly now I'm not even allowed to say that I'm innocent. Just a thought. And this is ultimately what they're getting at. They told him that unless he agreed with their narrative, every member of his family would be hauled into Washington for FBI interviews.

Starting point is 00:17:55 Now he's thinking gunpoint. he's thinking all the stuff he went through. This is their argument. Again, I'm just kind of framing what they're putting forward, not necessarily entirely. I'll make it clear what I think. Now, I largely agree that this was very coercive. They promised that a confession would be reported to their bosses

Starting point is 00:18:10 and would help you down the line. So now it's in your interest will help you get out of this if you admit that you were guilty. And they assured him over and over that what was accused, what he was accused of was, you know, just one dumb mistake. A night when no one got hurt, something the three of them in that, room could simply put behind us.

Starting point is 00:18:28 Right? We get it. It was a small thing. And so now you get him worked in a position where maybe if I just say I did it, when there's clearly going to be no consequences, we can get out of this. Each is a recognized consideration in the voluntariness analysis. And the agents used them in combination. The agents used all of them simultaneously.

Starting point is 00:18:46 Dr. Richard A. Leo, who has consulted on 2,500 disputed confession cases, testified as an expert, 435 times, had been cited. favorably by the United States Supreme Court. He reviewed the record, recording, and transcript, and reached the conclusion the transcript compels. The interrogation was psychologically coercive. The expert that the U.S. government points to, in other cases, to be the expert. You can't mean, so much of this is impossible to miss. The answer, I mean, at the very least, you walk away going, well, whether or not they know they're choosing to make this guy the focal point. The answer to the

Starting point is 00:19:20 second question was on display in the interrogation room. Mr. Cole is autistic. A licensed neurosycologist diagnosed him with autism spectrum order level one. So requiring support. So I've meant to follow. I believe that means a higher level, but I didn't end up falling back on that. So you tell me in the chat where that falls. But either way, the point is enough for it to matter in this conversation. But the agents did not need to diagnose because Mr. Cole narrated his own unraveling as it happened. And this is the port that really upsets me. Or actually, oh, it's the next. We'll get into it next. But it says he has unravelable. He, he, narrated his own unraveling as it happened.

Starting point is 00:19:58 He says he organizes his life around routine and avoids anything that deviates from it, like a lot of autistic people. He is super introversive, introversive, and has trouble even maintaining a conversation like this, like the one they're involved in. He could not process what was happening.

Starting point is 00:20:17 His mind had gone blank. Now, we'll get into where he actually says these things. The agent's response to each disclosure of him basically admitting that he can't follow what's happening, that his mind is confused and he's trying was to simply continue to escalate. Those with what those tactics finally produced was not a voluntary decision, but simply a collapse. And I think that was pretty much where we're stopping.

Starting point is 00:20:40 Oh, this is the main one. Yeah. Okay. So next, Mr. Cole breaks. Now it says the record, and this is what Steve Baker was showing in his image. It says the record of Mr. Cole's last hour of resistance is difficult to read. Now, remember, this has been going on for. a long period of time where they are drilling and drilling and drilling.

Starting point is 00:21:10 Now, this comes down to the last hour. So that's how battered down he's been. I forget what the time frame was, but it was a very long interrogation. And it says he asked for a break, quote, just to process all of this. Now, while he was alone, and that's documented in here, they were out of the room, but still recording, obviously. He's alone in the interrogation room, shivering well wrapped in a blanket, according to the FBI. He was chanting to himself, rocking.

Starting point is 00:21:33 I didn't. I didn't. I didn't. I didn't. Even a small chance, even a small, tiny chance, smallest, tiniest chances. Do whatever you can declare your name. You can get out of this. He's saying this to himself. God, it just makes me sick. Like the idea that they're watching this, of course, their minds go, well, I mean, anybody could be lying. But at this point, the idea of the evidence before, which we'll get into more in a second, I mean, they're choosing to frame this person. That's what I believe. And it says, this was stimming.

Starting point is 00:22:05 the self-regulating repetition characteristic of an autistic person in acute physical and emotional distress. And there's a citation there from the experts captured on the government's own recording. Now, when the agents returned, Mr. Cole reported a giant pain in his stomach. The response, I know, are you ready? Are you ready to explain? Minutes later, the agents asked whether he wanted the interrogation to end. His answer revealed a mine that had stopped functioning.

Starting point is 00:22:31 Here's what he said. I don't know what to do anymore. I just, everything is just, everything is just blank. Being told, being told all of this, it's just a little too much to process. I'm sorry. Rather than honor that answer, the agent's pressed on. The acute surveillance video and asked Mr. Cole to identify the man in it. He denied any familiarity with what he saw.

Starting point is 00:22:56 Twice. Do you recognize that person? No. Have you watched this video before? No. Only then did the agent remind him what a, does not. denial would cost. And this is why I was pressing that point. Lying to a federal agent is breaking the law. That's another crime. So more lies just makes it worse. Okay. So at this point, after all this time in a

Starting point is 00:23:16 mentally confused state, you get pushed to a point to where you start to, I mean, if you're, even from a torture perspective, I'm not suggesting that's what this is other than mentally. The idea that we're talking about is that you get pushed to a position where you ultimately just say, whatever needs to end it. Ask Israel. They know well. So in this case, the point would be is that where he got to. And that's what they're arguing. And I think the experts agree is they coercively pushed him to a place to where he didn't even know he just wanted this to stop or didn't know what he was saying. And so at all the times, and of course, you could argue that he just finally confessed.

Starting point is 00:23:50 But with everything taken in conjunction or rather in, you know, looking at the full picture, this does not feel that way. So he goes, so after that again, he says more lies makes it worse. Okay. She goes, no, look at me. Do you understand that? Forceful. Seconds later, repeating the question, drew the opposite answer. So, is this individual you?

Starting point is 00:24:11 Yes. The confession was not the product of the video. Mr. Cole had just denied recognizing himself in it. It was the product of the threat. The agents turned no into yes by telling him that no was a crime. Now, you could argue that he knew better, but this is the point about this conversation. Is this somebody who can be broken down to a place to where they don't even functionally understands anymore?

Starting point is 00:24:32 and that's what they're arguing. Now, I know of examples like this in this, with this government. Example, I mean, I did an entire focus for a while of how often they would shoot autistic people in the street because they have no understanding on a police level how to engage with that. Now, from that point forward, there was a lot of work on trying to, and I think, I mean, either way you look at it, I think they fully understand how this can work. And I think we've seen numerous examples like this.

Starting point is 00:24:56 For example, previous, this is why I framed it this way today, going back to 2018, parents catch FBI and plot to force mentally ill son to be a right-wing terrorist. Now, I've referenced this many times. Matt Agarist, the Free Thought Project, is a fantastic article. It'll blow your mind. It's as clear as it sounds. And the parents find out, they go, what are you? What's happening here?

Starting point is 00:25:16 Literally had tried to set this guy up. And it was just an autistic guy who wanted to, you know, if you break the story down as simple as possible, and I think it's very easy to understand, the guy wanted a friend, had nobody, no friends. and these people took advantage of that. They can pretend it to be his friend. And all of a sudden, he just wanted to be liked by this group he fed. He finally has friends.

Starting point is 00:25:36 And they go, hey, let's just do stuff. Let's go bomb this thing. You want to do that? And the end of the day, he didn't even agree. Rather, did in the conversation, but then ultimately said, no, and the parents find out, and they stop it all. And they still charge him. And so this is what we deal with, guys.

Starting point is 00:25:49 I mean, I've gone through this so many times. In fact, if I just type FBI, I'm willing to bet that some of these will pop up right now. What's this one? See what this one is. I was hoping, like, you know, Oh, we just talked about this. And this is another one to remember. FBI manufactures another plot.

Starting point is 00:26:05 This Cash Patel ridiculous done. Where this woman went in with a Burka at Home Depot with the FBI's money with an FBI car, with an FBI plan, didn't do anything. And they, oh, she's a criminal. The whole thing is insane, guys. And you're taking advantage of people who are mentally troubled, I argue. But the other, in fact, is probably in here, right here. This is the Intercept.

Starting point is 00:26:37 see what this one was. And this is a good one. This is a good article back in 2020, 2015. Why does the FBI have to manufacture its own plots of terrorism and ISIS are such grave threats? Plenty more than that one, too. Anyway, back to the point. I mean, I guess the focal here is that now you know you have the the Trump administration, a Republican administration doing the same thing. It says the agent's reaction confirmed that the entire morning had been engineered to produce. After he said that, right, after all this exam, and basically just forced him into that position, the moment he said that, they went on, it's over. Take a breath, take a breath, it's over.

Starting point is 00:27:18 Let your mind breathe, okay, cry, do whatever you have to. It's over. It's over, okay? We can resolve this case. We finally got him to say yes. After everything and the evidence doesn't match up, that's all they've used to drive this forward. It really does make me, like, uncomfortable. You know, the idea, you know, the main part of it,

Starting point is 00:27:36 that he's literally, as they know, rocking back and forth saying, I didn't, I didn't, I didn't, you know, like this, it just to me, of course somebody could make that up. But if you understand what this person is dealing with and the reality, I think this shows you exactly what was happening. This person is confused and they're going, I mean, am I missing? Because you understand, if somebody lives with this, you probably get to a point to where you question things. Am I having a problem?

Starting point is 00:28:02 Did I do this? And I'm confused? The whole thing comes down to the way that the FBI. operates and it really does make me sick. Now that isn't, now, that alone is enough. Then you stand back and look at everything we were just talking about. The actual gate, the things they're using to track us through ice and everything else, and they can look at it and show that it's not the same gate. You can look and see the body differences. You can see any number of things. On top of the fact that, like the motive, that's not, that's not where you

Starting point is 00:28:29 start because you don't know, right? But think about it. Why would this make sense? Now, you know what does make sense, the justification for everything they've been doing that drives beyond this, both left and right. Now, on top of that, DOJ rescinds DC pipe bomb suspect. This is from yesterday. After FBI confession transcript released. Okay. So finally, the transcript comes out, which then shows people how disgustingly coercive they were with an autistic man to use him and blame him for this case and go what they do, they double down, which is just so perfectly Trump as far as I can see it. The Department of Justice re-indicted an accused pipe bomb suspect Brian Cole Jr. Who, by the way, is, yeah, still in prison until the trial, which makes no sense with what we're talking about,

Starting point is 00:29:20 doubling the number of felony counts against him days after his lawyers released the transcript of the FBI interview in which he confessed to applying to devices outside the national headquarters. well, that's how that's how that sounds when you don't read what actually happened. And we could be objective and say that maybe he is guilty. Maybe that was the confession. It's just that's not what that adds up to me. And then why is all the other evidence completely in contrast to the reality? A federal grand jury returned an eight count indictment Wednesday that charge call separately for each bomb.

Starting point is 00:29:54 Why would that even make sense? So to me, this is so transparently coercive or rather not coercive, but vindictive. you're in a moment where this is already happening. You're in the middle of this case, and a transcript comes out that makes people go, whoa, that's how you did this. And so you just scream over the top and double down and more charges. Why would they do that unless this was meant to make a point to distract from what happened?

Starting point is 00:30:19 That just doesn't make any sense, guys. What's the driving force for this? Something other than just finding the truth out, clearly, Cole, 30, has pled not guilty on top of all of that, right? So it's come back around and now he's in front of a judge. Not guilty. I didn't do this. Which is how it started.

Starting point is 00:30:35 The only discrepancy was that one moment you saw right there. Neither device detonated after the prosecutors say he planted them. So doesn't this start to feel like what we keep seeing? Some of these events that are ultimately meant to be used and not even actually to have any, like just, you know, the woman in a burqa. I mean, it's very, the hallmarks are very similar. Both were discovered the next day. About three hours into the interview, an agent showed Cole. a surveillance image and asked, so this individual is you.

Starting point is 00:31:04 Quill answered, yes. Quite the truncation, Washington examiner of what actually happened. But, you know, that's how partisan media tends to work. My point is that you get the Trump administration that gets information in size to just push harder. You know, that's what they do, right? You can cut in a lie, you yell it louder. That's what they keep doing. It's not unique, but it's pretty damn obvious right now.

Starting point is 00:31:28 To read this article and plenty of others we've talked about on this conversation. It'll frustrate you, I'm sure. Now, here is the Gateway Pundant. Court documents former U.S. Capitol Police officer turned CIA employee failed polygraph test regarding J6 pipe bombs. Now, this adds to it because this was the one of the original suspects. Now, what I find very fascinating about this is that this person, the original Capitol Police officer, that Bassie and the rest were saying that's what this aligned with, the Capitol Police officer that was originally the suspect, failed a polygraph test. when asked whether they were guilty.

Starting point is 00:32:09 Doesn't that seem relevant? And again, most of you know all of this, but it's important to put this together for those that haven't seen this story. Here is what it says. There's a lot you should read in here, but the main thing that stands out to me, on November 6, 2025,

Starting point is 00:32:27 Ms. Kirchkoff, that's who we're discussing, was interviewed by the FBI and took a polygraph examination. She was asked, which interesting, I haven't heard of Brian Cole doing that. Don't you think that might be relevant? Maybe because it'll end up being, or maybe they did,

Starting point is 00:32:40 and it turned out what they wanted, so they kept it out of the record. Doesn't feel weird. They would do it here or not there, right? But it says she was asked two relevant questions. Interviewed about this event, and they said, did you place those pipe bombs? And did you place those pipe bombs that evening?

Starting point is 00:32:58 So just variation to the same questions. Ms. Kirchkoff failed the polygraph. The FBI polygraph examiner noted, Kirkhoff's quote, very controlled reaction to the news of her failing the polygraph and seemingly rehearsed responses to the questions.

Starting point is 00:33:19 I mean, is it, I mean, it's like, I shouldn't even be shocked. It's like we don't know who these people are, but for those that don't understand who, it's just the idea that you can have this all next to each other. Okay, so she failed a polygraph. The person who does is for a living said that she felt, like she had canned responses and were and and totally acted normal when told she failed.

Starting point is 00:33:42 On November 7th, 2025, five days before the FBI opened a case on Mr. Cole, the FBI named Mrs. Kirchhoff as a person of interest in the pipe bomb investigation. Open to file on her. The government immediately issued subpoenas and preservation requests for numerous electronic accounts associated with Ms. Kirchoff. On November 12th, 2025, but a week later, the same day the government officially opened the investigation into Mr. Cole, FBI agents attempted to question Ms. Kirkoff and Mr. Dickert at her residence. The next day, the FBI interviewed Mrs. Kirkoff's dog walker because the ultimate

Starting point is 00:34:19 argument is they showed a video that I don't know why you think you can verify that says that she was home playing with her dogs. The following day, Ms. Kirchoff and her boyfriend, Daniel Dickert, also a Capitol Police officer, were interviewed together by the FBI and the U.S. A. USA Ballantine. Throughout November 2025, the FBI interviewed Ms. Kirchoff's co-workers at the Capitol Police,

Starting point is 00:34:42 her neighbors, surveilled her without her knowledge, requested her employment records from the CIA, because, you know, she worked for the CIA, no big deal, and sent surveillance footage

Starting point is 00:34:51 of her walking to a podiatrist likely for a gate analysis. Mr. Cole was arrested December 5th, 2025. The FBI closed surveillance on Ms. Kirchoff, never looked back. I mean, to me,

Starting point is 00:35:04 you have evidence that points to her direction, for far more than Brian Cole. Gate discussion as they were pointing to. That's what Massey was calling out originally. And you have the polygraph where she got caught lying, or at least that she didn't answer truthfully. And you just close the case and move on

Starting point is 00:35:25 because she shows you a video that suggests that she wasn't there. And Brian Cole is all the opposite until you basically, after hours of interrogation, coerce him and just saying yes, once. I don't think I need to push any further here, guys. I mean, it's, I'm not suggesting this. proves, but what it shows you is a very sloppy case of people who made up their mind before you ever got actual evidence and just, I think, held the line. It could just be that

Starting point is 00:35:49 they wanted to win so bad. Dan and Cash are just floundering as they were, and DeCash still is, that they just forced this through. Sad. All those will be included. You can look through it for yourself. Now, in case you didn't see it, by the way, as much as I doubt it will go anywhere, Donald Trump has gotten 26 articles of impeachment from a Democrat from Tennessee. So I doubt, I mean, I don't think any of them actually even want this to happen because it'll only swing back around towards them and future administrations. But at the end of the day, I think it's about framing them as the adversarial group. Congress clearly does not care about all the crimes they're committing. So worth noting, though, that it is getting more obvious.

Starting point is 00:36:28 Now, on a couple of the points around Trump before we get into the false flag conversation, which, I mean, you can see why that's relevant. I mean, it's a small version of a similar conversation. It's, I wouldn't call it a false flag, but we're talking about a frame job, right? And that's exactly what a false flag ultimately is, framing somebody else for something you conduct, or at very least for something somebody conducted. Now, a couple quick points on Trump, case you didn't see these, Gunther Eagleman says, hey, 60 million American kids just got an account with their name on it. Oh, okay, Treasury Finance finished, excuse me, automatic enrollment for Trump accounts.

Starting point is 00:37:04 Oh, so one of his weird little programs that he's basically trying to coerce people to get it. Guys, this is a transparent effort for digital ID and just digital identity in general. All, I mean, so here's a, I mean, how much you want to bet that this money's not even there for most people? All they're trying to do is drive people into the app, as it says. Every eligible child under 18 with a social security number now has one waiting to be claimed. If your baby was born between these years, the government will drop that money in there and you can get it after you, after you, after you, after you, claim it on the official Trump accounts app. It's just funneling you into this conversation.

Starting point is 00:37:40 It's going to force you to then officially set up your digital identification. That's what this is. And it's just funny that the, I mean, not like we have to pretend Nicole Guntherman was ever a serious person, but even his own people laugh at them now because him and Kat Turd just say, whatever Trump sounds great. And nobody thinks that anymore. But overall, it's exactly what we're all fighting and bribing people to do it. And I'm willing to bet you that you probably won't even get the money because that seems

Starting point is 00:38:02 pretty consistent, doesn't it? But as Scott Horton says, yeah, that's communism, though. And I guess we pretend that's not what it is, even though it's obvious. You know, it's just hilarious. And it's not unique to communism. It's just funny that that will be called that and a fraction if it was the other side. But again, I think that part of the conversation is a very small minority today, guys. I could be wrong.

Starting point is 00:38:21 At the very least, I believe it's the minority. But in case you forgot, here are some other things that are coming right soon around the corner because Trump promised. So much money coming in from tariffs that will be able to issue at least a two, thousand dollar dividend and also pay down debt. And a new concept where we give 20% of the Doge savings to American citizens. And we'll pass the great healthcare plan to stop all government payments to the big insurance companies and give the money directly to the people for you to go out and buy your own health care.

Starting point is 00:38:51 33. With in their pockets like all the rest. Three million Medicare beneficiaries will soon receive a card in the mail containing $200 that they can use to help pay for prescription drugs. make so many claims like this and none of them happen you know i mean as much as the mainstream calls it out you'd think there'd be more than just this casual glance at how he's a liar we all know that like these are criminal acts like i mean look at venezuel and all the money they stole and that nobody knows where it went it's there's no real effort to expose that they call it out they say it

Starting point is 00:39:25 and then it move because there's no real accountability not even from the media that pretends to hate them it's a closed cycle or circle of you know whatever they are doing they're can call each other out. They can get fired from their job. They can resign in disgrace, but there's no actual accountability because none of them actually want that, it feels like, seems. Reports that you're considering doing something so long across the country, giving them some type of wellness, somewhere that's child. Are you considering that? When you get the point. Five thousand, no, it didn't happen. Five thousand midterm checks, right?

Starting point is 00:39:54 I mean, does anybody actually believe that's coming? I guess we'll find out. Now, on an AI point, I want to highlight that it's important to see, and you'll see some area from this as well. Trump says he and tech leaders signed an AI agreement that is morally binding. Like, okay, this is either truly how naive Trump is or how stupid he thinks we are, because this is just lazy, morally binding. So what that means is not binding at all. That's all that means is we, we know they're good, they're good people and they're going to do what's right. I mean, seriously, you mean Alex Carp, who said he's going to spray cat piss on people that protesting from drones, or Peter Thiel, who said the human race shouldn't agree.

Starting point is 00:40:33 I mean, come on, guys. It's just insane that they can push this forward. Trump is so clearly locked in with this agenda, again, probably because he thinks, even if we don't want it, that this will so radically change the world that he'll be remembered for the one that did it. Like, that's how I think he views this stuff. Morally binding. You should laugh at that. These are some of the most morally ambiguous, if not morally compromise people that I've ever seen in my life. But AI is coming because, you know, they said they would do it the right way. Now, Trump signed a new accord on super intelligence. Now, I was wrong, by the way.

Starting point is 00:41:09 I mean, that was more of a thought. I wasn't, you know, who knows where we go. I predicted before because he said supreme intelligence was what he thought. And then put it out as a vote. I kind of thought he would just go with what he originally wanted. I guess I was wrong. But super intelligence, which is just a dumb DBA. How was that different than artificial?

Starting point is 00:41:26 I mean, essentially it makes it a good thing versus a artificial thing. Right. You're framing it in a way. It's like the, you know, the way they change. these words to make you feel better about them because they think your children, truly, or they are, truly. But overall, the point becomes it concludes a spelling error. You can't, I mean, this, this point about how incompetent, stupid, it may be that we've

Starting point is 00:41:49 always overestimated these people or at the very least the ones in front of us and not the ones actually in charge, both of which I agree to, to a certain amount or to a certain degree, but it's hilarious because he posted this himself, guys. He literally posted this himself and you can see it right there. They spell you. And you can argue it wasn't Trump, but they spell United States, UNI-T-E-S-States.

Starting point is 00:42:11 S-T-A-U-N-S-T-A-U-N-S-A-U-N-S-S-T. I mean, how is that even possible? In the white, I mean, it's just, it's a perfect example of where we actually are on super intelligence. You got to laugh at how stupid that is. Oh, wait, hold on.

Starting point is 00:42:27 Oh, it's not going to come back up now. I think that was one that might be relevant to the show, but yeah, it's not going to reload. Anyway, oh my God. So stupid. So here is the actual post. You can see it. It's closer.

Starting point is 00:42:39 Signed by meta and open AI. You know, as we were discussing back in 2024, the good guys, right? The good guys working with Trump to save the world from the deep state that we otherwise called them years ago. Funny how that works out. Now, I want to include an article from Derek that we're going to be discussing tomorrow and, you know, 95% likely that that will be put out either tomorrow or live stream when we do it.

Starting point is 00:43:00 But, you know, always who knows what may happen. The reason I record all of interviews usually is because I all, I seem to have weird internet connection issues and we lose each other and better to edit that out. But I'll decide tomorrow. Either way, we're going to be talking about that tomorrow, likely coming out tomorrow. You need to read this if you haven't. It's almost too exactly what I would expect. And I did not bring this up.

Starting point is 00:43:20 This was completely something he investigated and found on his own. Irregular. The name of a company that it just turns out is at the center of this rogue AI conversation and just so happens to be an Israeli company tied all over the place to unfairly intelligence. literally as it writes, the Israeli company with intelligence ties at the center of the rogue A.I incidents. Now, that doesn't have to prove, as Derek writes in this article, that it means anything other than that they're Israeli. But isn't it interesting? After everything we're talking about, after everything in the spy, I mean, and it just turns out that most, not all, but most of these,

Starting point is 00:43:55 they're in the midst of this conversation. I mean, that's like finding, like, like, Comframe or Wave, I mean, in these different companies that, bring in Israeli tech and then have a hack next week. And they go, oh, they hack the Israeli tech. No, the Israeli tech is what clearly, you know, that's what I would argue. But my point is they're not going to go into this depth now because we're going to talk about it tomorrow. But make sure you read it because the bottom line is rarely intelligence, unit 81, unit 800, tied all the way through this company.

Starting point is 00:44:24 And they're clearly, as we've highlighted, and I included at the end of the article 12, tell you that we, they, Israeli intelligence drives through these companies. Now, you could argue these two people. These are the Israel, both is the CEO and whatever the title is, both the founders who directly come for Israeli intelligence. You could argue that they're not knowingly doing this. But my point is always is that Israel and their intelligence will utilize this company should they want to and they will allow it.

Starting point is 00:44:52 History is shown that, and I have no doubt about that. But my opinion. So realize that when we're driving this rogue AI conversation that's literally driving for them to nationalize or to control or to verify. all the things we're trying to fight in the sense of how they apply to us that it's suspect now we're going to be having a panel about this there's a dip issue on the time overlap for everybody in the in the i may but we are planning on still having a panel about this very conversation and there's different opinions throughout this one more than usual actually and it's a good good conversation though good reason to be

Starting point is 00:45:22 debating because none of us really know for sure you know is there actually some issue with this is it all a big narrative construct that drive us into he talks about that a lot in this article but question because I think we all recognize there's obvious problems and risks, dangers with what they're doing, especially the way they're doing it. But that's not to say that we want them to then use this to drive verifications and digital IDs and all the different things they're using as the expected solution to whatever problem they're pointing to. But again, we'll come back to it.

Starting point is 00:45:53 I'll include these for today, in case you want to go further on some of the shows we already did. Trump has all allowed invasive Israeli spyware tech to infiltrate the U.S. and surveil Americans. goes like a long way. This is just newer parts of it, as well as the bigger point about corruption, but the technocrat side of it, how Trump swindled Americans and sold out the country to technocrats. I'm glad we're all finally admitting this to ourselves out there. Now, on AI, last two points before we get into a time, time, time, time dot com article that Trump interviewed, or rather the transcript of it with time, and the interview is interesting.

Starting point is 00:46:28 And the statements that he makes that tie to a lot of stuff we're talking about today. First, though, here's Alex Carp. You know, the one he wants you to believe is morally bound to do the right thing through this conversation. And as they frame it here, Alice Carp has a mental breakdown in front of reporters. Message for the president today when you guys are. Okay, you know what? I love you guys. Ask these questions.

Starting point is 00:46:48 They're stupid as shit. I'll give you my question. What's a good question? What do you think about AI and why do you believe it? Why is it good for America? And that's the kind of question I can answer. Okay. With great respect, because I love you guys.

Starting point is 00:46:58 And I like you guys too. I appreciate it. It's like, it's like, it's like, it's like, it's like, The president said, he doesn't think we need AI safety. What did I just, okay. Do you really expect me to ask that question? Do you think I'm the village idiot? I'm asking you the question, right?

Starting point is 00:47:09 So you can answer it. No, no, I gave you a question that was. He's so abrasive. And like not in a weird, like, you know, almost like he just has complete, he believes he has the right to do it. You know the word I'm looking. For some reason, I'm just blanking on it. Like, it's very clear to me that he just thinks that he has that authority.

Starting point is 00:47:29 You know, it's just weird. And he's like this with everybody, you know. And but it's what he says in there that's continually. So this is a question I could answer. All right. What do you believe about AI? Let's do that. What do you believe about AI?

Starting point is 00:47:41 AI has to work for the warfighter, has to work for enterprises. It has to be safe, has to be powerful. And there's only one country in the world that has this kind of AI stack, both the people and the products. Okay. Palantir and other companies are leading on the battlefield and leading. And the questions Americans have are, does it work for? me, is it just a bunch of unpleasant people getting rich who ask anoxious questions and refuse to ask questions that they're being asked? Or it doesn't work? He's not even being

Starting point is 00:48:08 coherent when you break it down. Are you talking about yourself or the media? And how are the media the ones who are rich, arrogant? You know, it's like, it's almost as if he can't keep a coherent thought. Like it's all mashed together. I mean, you can argue it's just, I mean, I do that sometimes where you're jumping from thought to thought and it becomes hard to, you know, but either way, the point is that I think what happens when he does that is it lets things out that he wouldn't otherwise want to be stated. I'll make a point when this is done. Work for you guys.

Starting point is 00:48:33 Do you feel like AI is working for you? It's just a weird, you know, and the thing in the beginning is, okay, so we ask a question. And your response is like, you're serious? Like, don't ask a question. Okay, fine, you said your piece.

Starting point is 00:48:45 And then he goes to ask it. And he goes, like, did you not hear me? Oh, so now he's just obligated to respond the way you, he has to ask what you think you should ask. And then he answers it because he forces him to do it. It's just, these people believe they are entitled. That's the point. I mean, it is obvious.

Starting point is 00:49:01 They believe they are the rulers of this world. You could ask them and they'll basically admit that to you guys. And this is the whole tech, you know, te feudal, what's the, you know, the, is it techno feudal state? I think that's the way I forget it before. But, you know, like a feudal state, but in the, you know, technocratic world. That's, and I think they felt this way for a long time. The idea that they've been behind the scenes as these kind of oligarch, elitist, you know,

Starting point is 00:49:27 masters of the universe. the Elon Musk types. That's how they see themselves. So the points that I think are relevant to carry over from this clip, as I said here, can remember he's saying, you know, military, military. It's all about, it's not how they're framing this. AI is going to make the world safer and get people IDs and, you know, that's how they want to frame it. But so clearly he said it's about military and clearly that we're so far ahead of everybody. Okay. So you're not actually going to race with China then. And it's, it's, and this is about the military and surveillance, as you just clearly outlined.

Starting point is 00:50:00 Got it. So in case you wanted to understand what they're really doing, there it is. They're building military and they're building surveillance, guys, and they don't care about what you think in China is light years behind them right now. So you make that of what you will. The point is that they want us to think we had to do it to fight the bad guys when the bad guys are literally telling you what they're doing. Now, Tucker Carlson's morning note, as Harrison Burger writes, if Times reporting is accurate,

Starting point is 00:50:27 then the president of the United States launched one of the most bellic Coast military invasions in American history on the advice of a chatbot. Of course it was grok. It's hard to imagine clear proof that the people running our country are nothing close to the geniuses they want you to think they are. They're faking it as they go, he argues. There is no master plan. The White House is not playing 40 chess or even checkers.

Starting point is 00:50:51 Literally. Sorry, I scooped much right there. Donald Trump on Thursday and included a truly wild claim about the president's use of artificial intelligence, which is below. It's right here. Oh, wait. why is that not popping up? Well, that's interesting.

Starting point is 00:51:14 Since returning to office. Ooh, okay. How interesting. Unless this, I, you know, this could be a minor assumption on my part. I thought that was the same article. Either way, we're going to read into the next one.

Starting point is 00:51:34 But what's interesting to me is that if, I'm not going to take time to do it now since we're live. And I wonder if that was taken out of there. Because, I mean, look, it's like the same exact setup. That's why that is, and again, I want to be clear. that was, I just had thought this was the same article that was being discussed. Let me check one more thing.

Starting point is 00:51:50 This is, let's see, Trump marvelled. Huh. Okay, let's make sure there's no kind of an additional page. How interesting is that? Damn it, I want to take time to check to see if it's different article, but it's not relevant to the point right now, so I'm going to wait because it'll take away from the show.

Starting point is 00:52:10 So the point, though, nonetheless, was as the argument goes, and this is something he might even dispute, the article in the interview, it's claiming simply that Grock you know, according to the official present, the chatbot responded to Maduro was a repressive and deeply unpopular dictator and that many Venezuelans would likely celebrate his downfall. And so Trump would, oh, then I'll do it because it'll make me popular, you know, even though it's wildly illegal, even though you're not even remotely what you, that this country and this government pretend that they are, but we know that they're always like.

Starting point is 00:52:45 So think about the AI point. And Trump's going, hey, Grock, should I, should I do this policy? Should I invade Iran? Will people like it? And Elon Musk is over here going, yes, do it on the keyboard. You know, however you want to frame that, it's effectively insane, alarming that we're talking about this man being so easily played by the people around him. So as Justin Mash writes, this exchange and others with time reveal a man who has completely

Starting point is 00:53:07 lost touch with reality. Remember, he talks about the hoax of AI. So what is the hoax of AI? Who's behind it? He says, the whole country is based on fake stuff because these people have Trump derangement syndrome. Right, because I made fun of this. So the idea that AI might end up being dangerous is, you could argue it's incorrect, inaccurate,

Starting point is 00:53:31 even a lie maybe, even though it hasn't happened. I'd even dispute that. So it's hard to lie if it hasn't come to pass yet. It'd be incorrect. Right. But a hoax is so stupid. He's trying to tap into what he thinks people like us talking about. It's not a hoax if it's an idea about what might come to pass.

Starting point is 00:53:46 And it's just, again, I am day by day. my opinion of who he is and what he's capable of, not even just because he's older, but maybe in general, is going down and down and down. And I'm wondering, just like with Musk, how long we've been convinced by propaganda,

Starting point is 00:54:03 these people are, you know, I've never thought highly of them, but, you know, I don't know, man, it's worth asking. Biden's the same exact thing, guys. There's something,

Starting point is 00:54:10 and I'm not talking about being seen out necessarily. That may play a factor, but just as you're going to see here, good luck trying to pretend like this is not obvious. So it starts with this about AI. Do you still disagree Dario from Anthropic with the views on what he, on what he calls AI safety? So he said, I spoke to him when he rambles, it's not working reading its heart.

Starting point is 00:54:34 This guy's all over the place. But it says, look, this is Trump. I say, if you're going to seek regulation, and he's made some rambling point like this before, if you're going to seek regulation, they can put you out of business. Now, first of all, what do you mean if you're going to see? because who's seeking is people like us. So if you're going to seek regulation, they can put you out of business.

Starting point is 00:54:55 He's immediately framing himself on the side of the business opportunities and he's the government. So you would be seeking regulation. Like my point is, I don't even feel like he sees himself as that position. It's almost like he's the one playing through it to benefit his elitist inner circle,

Starting point is 00:55:10 which is what it all feels like. But anyway, they can put you out of business. Okay, so regulation can put you out of business. That's not the question, though. Is it dangerous and should we have something regulating that path. He says, now you do have to be responsible for yourself, and there aren't a lot of people that understand what's going on.

Starting point is 00:55:28 Remember, the question is, AI safety, do you agree that there's an issue with his framing? He says, but my attitude is we're winning against the world by a lot. This guy is an infant, and I want to keep winning. Or he believes you are that stupid. He says, there are those that say it's bigger than the industrial revolution. and you would think not. But actually, he says, if you look at the numbers, you ever see these numbers, I guess AI growing?

Starting point is 00:56:01 Yes, we're all concerned about it. That's the point. He says, they're like straight up in the air. Yeah, man, that's the point we're afraid of. You guys are, the entire economy is focused on this thing that most of us don't even want. And it says, and from our standpoint, and he could mean the government, he could mean the oligarchy, he could mean, whatever you want. He says, we have.

Starting point is 00:56:21 trillions of dollars being invested in our country because it's probably the biggest business there is. Okay. The question was about safety. We're the most advanced. We have the smartest people. And tomorrow, I have a big meeting. We have everybody. All the jaros coming back.

Starting point is 00:56:41 Oh, good. Now, if you're a real journalist, you'd be like, well, I asked if it was safety concerns. Do you have the, no, move on. I'm curious what's going on with all these meetings. that's, oh, okay, good. That's why I did this. Anyway, as usual, the point is that he rambles away from the answer question. And I don't even think it's necessarily always on purpose.

Starting point is 00:57:05 Like, I think he's just mind goes, I'm going to praise myself and ends up turning this into, we're winning against the world by a lot. And I want to keep winning. So your answer is, even if it's dangerous, we want to keep going because we're making money. Yes, not you. Clearly, he's not thinking about Americans because Americans are losing money every day. are making money, we are winning. Who does that mean? I mean, read that and try not to laugh, okay, because it's embarrassing that this person is even pretending to be in charge of this stuff.

Starting point is 00:57:33 Now, he is in the position to make decisions, but realize how clearly people around him are maneuvering everything. Now, this next one says, I want to talk about the debt in a second. But you mentioned the Supreme Court. You said last week these were not, you know, your choices. Remember that? because he starts by saying that they were. Because basically what happens, he's talking about the nominations and ultimately ends up going, you know,

Starting point is 00:57:58 when he wants to, says, I put them there because they're these. And then when he doesn't want to, says the opposite. So recently, because they're unpopular now, he says that he did not.

Starting point is 00:58:07 You said last week, these were not your choices. Kavanaugh, Coney Barrett, right? We're not the people you interviewed. Okay. She says, you said they were like shells

Starting point is 00:58:18 of their former selves. Do you regret nominating them? And he goes, what can I do? I put them in. It's funny how that works. But then says they voted against me too often. I was very, I gave them the position of a lifetime and they voted against me. Oh, so they're beholden to you as a Supreme Court. Isn't that what you keep accusing the Democrats of? Right? Like that's the whole point. Like they, the judges are politically biased. And now you're angry because they weren't politically biased for you. I mean, guys, it's not even secret or hard to see. It's just crazy that he's,

Starting point is 00:58:52 so blatant about this. So clear, they were supposed to do what I said. The guy's like a six-year-old. I don't think he even realizes what he's saying. He goes on and say the Democrats stick like glue. Those three, they virtually never vary. You can come up with the worst thing

Starting point is 00:59:08 in the world and they'll vote as a group. And while I don't like it, there's something I admire about it. There's loyalty. My God, guys, he's just clearly going, you're not, I thought about what you want, what you believe in, principle, and opinion? No, it's about being loyal to the team.

Starting point is 00:59:26 And we all know this if we're barely paying attention. But the fact that he says this, he's basically saying, I want what we tell you is bad when they do it. How do you not laugh at that stupidity? Or the idea that at the end of the day, you are literally telling us that you attack them because they didn't just vote with what you wanted, even though in many cases you could show legal realities.

Starting point is 00:59:48 Or in this case, the second part, plenty of examples where Democrats did not vote. in line with other Democrats. My point in general, though, is it's largely like that. We all know that. But in both sides of this, there's plenty of examples where they don't fall in line. Like with the ICE conversation, guys. I mean, it's just, it's just crazy. But as a side note, I thought that was worth pointing out. Now, this one says, let's talk about Israel. You have a board of peace that you're assembled. How to, I mean, again, right there, the idea, not that they have to always bring it up, but it'd be like, you know, the one assembled with all the war criminals and all the ones

Starting point is 01:00:20 committed genocide. But had a big ceasefire agreement last year, but Hamas did not disarm. They haven't laid down their arms. What are you going to do about that? Now, even this, by the way, is a deliberate misrepresentation by time. What happened was Trump made an agreement and said Hamas would have to disarm afterward and said Israel agreed. And then Israel said, F off, we don't, and bomb them. And then everybody stopped talking about it. So see how there's like this coordinated way they misremember things to make it. sir, that's corporate media for you guys. That's new media for you, both of them.

Starting point is 01:00:54 It's exactly how this works. But it says, I think I'll probably sit in this. No, sorry, one more last thing. If this is the left media that so hates Trump and wants to call them out, even lie in order to make it look bad. So right in this moment, why wouldn't you then go, how embarrassing for you? Right. You said it was a deal.

Starting point is 01:01:12 You said Israel agreed. And then Israel Netanyahu said, no, we did not. And so you lied apparently or he lied. And then they went forward. But instead, you make a point to lie for Trump by saying you had a ceasefire, but Hamas didn't lay their arms down. Again, go back and look. Trump was the one that made the agreement that they could do it after once this came to pass.

Starting point is 01:01:34 So they're lying. The left media lies to cover for Trump's lie. You work that out if you somehow think they're all fighting each other. It says, I think I'll probably sit in the situation room and make an appropriate decision. So that means he has no clue. The idea, what are you going to do about this situation? He loves to make that to make it sound like, I'm in the know and you're not, and I'm not going to tell you.

Starting point is 01:01:54 How much you would have bet he has no clue what's going to happen next? He said, I'll think I'll sit in the room and make an appropriate decision. He says, my decisions are correct ones. What an absolute moron. My decisions are the correct ones. I mean, it's like, he's trying to relay that sentiment and doesn't realize that you're not supposed to just bluntly say that. What I say is the right thing always.

Starting point is 01:02:14 That's what I want you to think. You don't say it like that. You know, it's just, again, diminishing. I don't know. but he goes, I mean, look at our country. I was moving. I don't know what that means. This country is booming during a conflagration.

Starting point is 01:02:26 No, it's not. It's literally not, guys. And it says, you know, during some people would say it's a war, some people would say it's not really a war. Who, I mean, this is the most embarrassing thing. And then it goes on to say, when we get a war this year. So it is, but you want to always walk it back and be like, I don't know, most don't think it's a war. Everybody knows it is and everybody thinks it's a war. That's just him being whatever you want to call it.

Starting point is 01:02:49 call that. I mean, it's like how, it's like lying about the Iran deal. You know, you just lie, lie straight forward. It's, it's a unwillingness to admit, even though you know everybody sees it. But it says when we get the war this, a war this year, you know, there's something, nothing's happened for the last two weeks, right? And somebody drops a bomb. Nothing happens. They drop a bomb. No, I think that you'll find out what I'm doing. Yeah, that made no sense at all. Basically, just rambling to make it sound like there's inside knowledge that he has that you don't, which I'm sure is there, but it says there have been repeated reports that meant prime minister Netanyahu was warned prior to October 7. Now, just to be clear again with this broken platform, they weren't

Starting point is 01:03:25 reports, guys. There's been unequivocal, it's been, UAE has admitted it. It's on the record, Egypt as well. There was examples where they said this. You have on the record IDF members who said it publicly in interviews that they told them and were threatened with arrest. You have countless examples of foreknowledge. And Trump says, I heard that today for the first time. What a liar. Are you serious? At the very least, you heard it and denied it because everybody's talked about it. He says, you have access to the highest intelligence. And he goes, I don't. I can't imagine this. I wonder if he means I don't have access to that. You mean that he knew about it? Like, he's aghast. Like, that can't be the truth. You just said you heard about it today. So why would your response mean,

Starting point is 01:04:06 like, but you think he knew? Yeah, you just said you heard about it. And it goes, yeah, that Egypt warned him and the UAE warned him. He goes, I don't think so. I think, you know, I think he would. have known and he would have done something about it. Again, despite the provable evidence that he knew and did not. Wonderful. This is where we are, guys. These people are monsters and they know it and they don't care and guess nothing stops that. We're going to try, though. So CNN on top of that, investigation has found that while Jared Kushner acted as a key Middle East peace negotiator, you know, like all of us were calling out while it was happening, his conflicts of interest, his private equity firm held the largest stake in an Israeli company backing businesses

Starting point is 01:04:46 tied to Israel's military campaign in Gaza, literally profiting off the military genocide in Gaza. How is that even allowed? It shouldn't be, including its largest arms manufacturer. Yeah, these guys are absolute monsters, guys. They don't care. They're profiting off the worst things you've ever seen. Everyone seems to know that, and it all just keeps slumbering forward. And here's just a breakdown of all the things he's involved with.

Starting point is 01:05:11 millions and millions and hundreds of millions of dollars, munitions, electronics, drones, cameras, aircrafts. Yeah, the peace presidency. Now, on the false flag conversation, very quickly an update on the RAF, sorry, which by the way, actually is developing in a, you know, more in the direction of unbelievable, but it is developing. I covered this on the 27th, alleged terror plot on U.S. base in the UK. Now, even today on either one of these,

Starting point is 01:05:43 I'm hesitating on just saying at this point I'm still questioning whether this was simply an a sci-off of opportunity, right? Something that was taking advantage of or not. I'm leaning further away from that as more facts come out with this fly to buy one. But either way, I think it's,

Starting point is 01:05:58 it behooves us to not immediately always go as far and say it was all planned out, it was all fake, you know, it's important to think through that. Now I'm obviously open to that possibility. That's right up there right now with what's happening. But you'll see why as we go through this, there's, you know, there's anomaly still. And I think it's important to see that it's,

Starting point is 01:06:13 it could have been something other than a planned out lie, right? But telling you guys, it's getting, as I write in the title, it's breaking down in real time, like so many other events they pushed. So first on the RAF Fairford, sciop, because I mean, even whether, however this was planned out or what happened,

Starting point is 01:06:32 it's clearly being used and lied about. That's a psychological operation. Now, UK Indian dual national arrested over the incident. Now, if we don't remember, please watch the last show. This ended where they were let out on bail. The fans were there. I can remember all the small details. The farmer recalls the number they gave her.

Starting point is 01:06:52 Nobody answers, which makes no sense because they're supposed to be on heightened security. Says that she saw Middle East men, even though they had masks on in the middle of the night. Some run into the woods. Some run towards the base. Again, that doesn't make any sense. And then somehow 15 minutes later, they come and they're still there. That's why everybody's account, guys. That's laughable for fuel to use the name of the,

Starting point is 01:07:13 The truck, okay, they find things in the back of the car. Turns out it was gas, not making that up. Like I joked about at the time, gas, petrol, in a car. Oh, my God. Okay, so that's the reality of that. They let him out on bail. There's no evidence of anything so far. That's why they were let out.

Starting point is 01:07:30 Now, realize bail is a little different in the UK. There's bail in the sense of being charged with the crime, but I guess it's common where you can be laid on on bail, even though you haven't been charged, which I think is ridiculous, but just realized that that's, they've been let out because there is no charge yet. That's what's crazy. Now, a UK Iranian dual national, they've all, the UK and Trump and the UK and the United States have been pushing Iran's connection, foreign actors with nothing to go on. At the very least, nothing they've told us. A UK Iranian dual national now, and this is as of

Starting point is 01:08:02 yesterday today, has been arrested on suspicion. So get this. The whole thing is suspicion of a possible terrorist attack. That's why they've been let out. There's no evidence. It's all suspicion. So now you've arrested an Iranian dual national under and arrested on suspicion of preparation of a terrorist attack in connection with the incident that you know that you suspect was maybe something. So you have an incident that you think might have been something. And now you have this person who's suspected of maybe preparing the thing that might have happened.

Starting point is 01:08:34 Sound investigation. I mean, again, you know, it's always possible that this could end where more information comes out. They didn't show you. And it all makes sense. Unlikely, historically, especially. but consider it. The 25-year-old man was arrested in London, West Minister.

Starting point is 01:08:50 Two properties in the area have been searched. Five men in their 20s who were arrested near the, was it, Gloucestershire Air Base on Sunday, remain on police bail. All five were UK nationals from London. Now, is this, are you arresting an Iranian national just to make that statement? The investigation into circumstances surrounding events in Gloucestershire is hugely complex, they say, and our specialist teams are interrogating multiple lines of inquiry. That's a meaningless statement.

Starting point is 01:09:18 How is it highly complex? Walk me through that. It seems pretty cut and dry. Now, I'm not suggesting I know why they were there, but that's the whole reason a lot of us are like, clearly something was a myth. You guys were doing this. Why do they run towards the base? Why did it turn out that one of them actually called 999-9-1, one of them, as we'll get into now?

Starting point is 01:09:39 Prime Minister Andy Burnham said on Wednesday that there were strong indications that Iran played a part. No one's explained why that even makes sense. And when they're asked, there's no explanation. He did not provide details and Tehran has denied the involvement. And again, how stupid it would be that they would do anything like that when they have a legal right international law to bomb the base that is being used to bomb them. The BBC understands that one of these men dialed 999 for, you know, 911 for the U.S., himself about an hour before the local farmer alerted police. Guys, that's about the dumbest thing in the world.

Starting point is 01:10:15 Unless that's, if they're wrong or making that up, if that's actually what happened, you walk me through why they would call the police on themselves. They were arrested on suspicion of explosive offenses and later on suspicion of preparing a terrorist attack. Okay, so now that they do not have explosives, ask yourself while they're still being held on suspicion, or rather investigated, of explosives,

Starting point is 01:10:38 which would then link to the terrorist attack. But if there's no explosives, there's no explosives or terrorist attack, right? But it says before being released on bail on Monday in what police called an investigative decision that was grounded in experience, a strategy. I think they want you to assume they're fishing. Like they know they're guilty, but they want to see who they talk to. Maybe. I don't think so.

Starting point is 01:10:58 Police said a quantity of petrol gas, but no explosive devices were found during searches. So you don't, Daily Mail, you want to own up to this fake policeman you say told you there was a bomb? I doubt it even happened. Or maybe the policeman did say that because they were supposed to. And it wasn't the reality. Or maybe it was. Now they're hiding it. I mean, at the end of the day, guys, there's so many obvious disconnects here.

Starting point is 01:11:22 Petrol is the story. So why did this become a highly complex event? Why did you say it was a major security threat when this first started? I think the narrative was what was driving it because that was the plan. That's what feels like makes sense to me. You, Marco Rubio again said, for an actor, clearly involved. How? Clearly. How so?

Starting point is 01:11:43 He realized they're not even indicating that they have more intelligence, guys. They're just talking over the top of this entire narrative. Now, this is from Breitbart, Iranian citizen arrested in relation to a legendary plot. I just want to point out the one thing they added here in their report, it says, we have been waiting to confirm what we could say, but we can now confirm our belief that Iran played a part. So they're literally going. Iran was involved. Iran played apart. We now confirmed that. But then not giving any of evidence.

Starting point is 01:12:11 and there's no indication that makes sense at all. This backs up claims from Marco Rubio, who said the same. So clearly they have an agreement here, guys. It's a UK-US base. Trump said right when this happened, it was an operation, we got them, we've been watching them. So either that was Trump letting, like trying to own something that wasn't his, so he pretended like he was involved,

Starting point is 01:12:32 or he admitted something he wasn't supposed to. And maybe that means that was something they planned, or maybe it really was an operation that Iran planned that they were stopping. The evidence does not back that. that up, though. Now, on to the next one. Now, we'll keep watching that one, guys. I mean, right now, if they're arresting an Iranian citizen, rather, you know, somebody who lives in London who has Iranian citizenship and they're claiming they're part of this, I mean, I feel a very, like, this feels like they're railroading him like

Starting point is 01:13:02 Brian Cole. And I think that's what we should watch for, because if no other evidence comes out, I mean, how can they possibly keep that story going? Now, what's interesting is Charlie and I yesterday had a conversation about this because we did an episode of what the hell was happening and this just was what was going around, right? So we got into it. And it was well before there was, as we were in the show, there was pieces that were developing. And I just found it interesting that we were just kind of having, you know, because this is more of a casual conversation in the show. We're just discussing things off the cuff, going over these about our opinions. And then after the show, it was pretty interesting how this all developed. So you'll watch this knowing that and you'll

Starting point is 01:13:36 find that very interesting. Again, I think our insight, you know, it's worth noting. You know, that's our you guys, we see these things when others are not. And again, this was not the first time that we were watching and thinking these things. Now, India today, this is from today. Netanyahu, UAE president, plotted fly to buy false flag up. Now, this is, right now I'm going to go over some of the things that are from yesterday and that we pointed out yesterday and then we're going to get into updates from today on this story. Now, this one's important because it was, there's a conversation about the fact that Iran has

Starting point is 01:14:10 intelligence that this was something that they saw coming. Now, what I can see is reports that came out the day it happened that they had prior knowledge. Now, that's interesting to me because historically, I've seen reports, like even, I was unable, and it's possibly because of the way the AI internet and, you know, I believe there's all, it's becoming increasingly difficult to find things that the system doesn't want you to find. Put it that way. But my point would be that in the past, because it's far as news, apparently that's the one that's, that reported this, that you'd be able to find that far as new report from the 29th, from the 28th, before this happened.

Starting point is 01:14:45 I wasn't able to find that. Doesn't mean it's not there. Nonetheless, consider that, this is what was being reported. Iran has accused Israel, Netanyahu, and the UAE president as well, of orchestrating what is described as a false flag around the fly-to-by cockpit incident. Now, we're going to go through this in depth. There's a lot that you haven't seen, you'll want to see. The allegations made in the press TV report claim that the episode was in

Starting point is 01:15:10 intended to divert attention away from what they're continuing to do to Gaza, is the point. And strengthened Netanyahu's political position. Now, that's, I mean, it's always relevant. I was going to say never not relevant. But the point is historically, even according to Israeli media, they laugh about it. They win Netanyahu, who has an election, you know, suddenly you start having, oh, a rocket fell in a field and all these different things that don't even, aren't even verified, and just simply drive the idea that he has to maintain power because we're under attack.

Starting point is 01:15:39 And it does win him some level of support. It happens every single time. So that's even before we got here. As I'll show you a couple examples, people were saying, here we go, get ready for whatever we're going to do, and here we are. And if that's what you believe, and I do, I think that this is a lot,

Starting point is 01:15:53 that is driving it, but plenty of other things, including Iran. Like Iran and the war they're conducting. But it says the report said that the flighted by plane incident appears to have been part of a scenario concocted by Netanyahu and Bin Zaid, the president of the UAE. The flight was carrying

Starting point is 01:16:09 174 passengers and 27 children. If you do believe this was something they were doing, then just because it's a false flag doesn't mean there's no violence or death, right? There's different versions of how that plays out. Wonder whether the 27 children were used. The report linked the scenario to Netanyahu's report, reported secret visit to Abu Dhabi a day before the incident, which is true.

Starting point is 01:16:34 He visited the day before and said that they were going to be attacked. I'll show you the video. where he met bin Zaid amid mounting political pressure over claims that the UAE leader had warned him in advance about an impending Hamas operation. Because that was coming around right then, right? That was one of the things they wanted to hide that you knew and now we can prove it, which we already were a long time ago. according to the press TV account, the alleged arrangement was designed to manufacture a dramatic security incident involving an Israeli heavy fly-to-buy, fly, because it was mostly Israelis going home, portray it as a terrorist attack, introduced an Iranian connection into the narrative, and then used the resulting alarm to reinforce Netanyahu's security credentials and build support for renewed military action against Iran. Now, to be clear, this is coming out today, right? the argument is this was something that Fars News got wind of,

Starting point is 01:17:23 is Ronnie an intelligence before? We'll go further back in a second, back to the 30th. This is just to give you the overview. Now, so the report said that Netanyahu and his war minister, Israel Katz, immediately characterized the incident as a terrorist attack. They did. Ben-Gabir as well. Netanyahu subsequently compared the incident to September 11.

Starting point is 01:17:41 Even though he tried to act like he was being moderate and, oh, well, we don't know for sure. He was out there saying things in front of Israel that were different, comparing it to September 11. that the Amani co-pilot had undergone radical indoctrination and suggested that Iran could have been involved. We'll get into that. It's all, now apparently they found Palestinian pamphlets in his home. I mean, certainly possible, but it feels very, I feel, obviously constructed. We'll go through it. The Israeli embassy in Australia has condemned conspiracy theories circulating online about the fly Dubai attack. Here we go, saying they are, they have recast the Jewish people as the culprits.

Starting point is 01:18:17 who's talking about Jewish people? Yes, we're talking about Jewish people that are involved in the Israel conversation or that is an overlapping sight. We're talking about Jewish people? We're talking about the Israeli government conducting attacks and lying about it. That's what everyone's talking about.

Starting point is 01:18:32 Now, yes, there are some out there in a tangential part of that or even overlap that do make it about Jewish people. The fact that you make this about everyone saying that fly you by was something that makes it only about Jew, that's not accurate. But they know that, guys.

Starting point is 01:18:46 Or they want to pretend like wink wink when he says the government he means you that's how this game is played that's not the truth think about a world like let's just take a second and not that we need to do this every time but talk about like china for example so china's government decides to to you know let's just say conduct an attack not a not even false large bomb a thing okay so the idea is that you can and then you could create an idea where the china represents this you know the you know Muslim or whatever else you want to frame it as like that's it's that's the state of the Muslims okay And then if they bomb that place, they say you only call that a crime because you hate Muslims.

Starting point is 01:19:24 Now, if you think that sounds ridiculous, you should think both do, right? The logic is the same. Why Israel, even if you somehow incorrectly believe it's the state of the Jews, if you believe the idea that somehow that means that the government can't commit crimes without you being racist, I mean, I don't even think we need to walk through that. It's like, it's just, it's in, it's embarrassingly naive. embarrassingly, like willfully stupid. No, anybody who's honest will say, well, there's a point in which that can happen,

Starting point is 01:19:56 where the is where the government can be guilty of a crime without you saying it's a Jewish view, but of course not. So same thing. Well, now you've recast the Jewish people in entirety as the culprits, which in some cases caused people to turn around and think the Jewish people are responses. That's how Zionism plays people. U.S. President Donald Trump on Thursday said Iran's Revolutionary Guard Corps could have been responsible.

Starting point is 01:20:18 He's now basically saying they were involved. Now, asked by Fox News, Peter Ducey, whether he had been briefed on a possible connection between Iran and the O'Lani co-pilot. See how that works out with the deal, and it's right of her moves. And Trump said, we're working on it. Now, here's what's funny.

Starting point is 01:20:35 He loves to do this where he, you know, my mind is that it's up in the air. But he says, we're working on it. Right now they're being very open with us. I would say the answer is based on what I'm saying, yes. He's like, he can't even help him, So we're working on it. You would just go, they were, they're saying yes. That's how you would

Starting point is 01:20:51 answer the question. But you were working on it. They're being open and his mind, I'm just, I'm going to, I want to be the one. Yes, it's yes. You'll find out. I'm telling you guys, if you haven't picked up on the childish nature of what he does, it's very consistent. But they all have the plan to blame Iran anyway, so it's not hard for him to see where that's going. But as Trump also said on Thursday, that Iran would be struck very hard if it was found to be linked. So, wherever all that Syria game went, you know, if there's a gas attack, we're going to bomb Assad. Oh, so anybody then could cast a gas attack and then you told you told them, we'll blame Assad, go ahead and do it.

Starting point is 01:21:29 Yeah, that's what they did. Same thing here, right? If we decide to blame around, we're going to bomb Iran, if we create the narrative that Iran's responsible. It's simple, isn't it? Now, here's just an image that was going around. Same thing. He said this. Here's the actual video, right?

Starting point is 01:21:47 This is on the 29. And it is exactly what it says. And even here's Rabbi Jeff on 29th saying false flag incoming. His opinion, obviously, right? Just four weeks before his election, Netanyahu says Mossad warned him that enemies would launch terror attacks against the left. And in many cases, they literally referenced airports. Not hard to see. Of course, we'll get into the anomalies of this.

Starting point is 01:22:11 It's crazy. The idea that he met Netanyahu while still in his bloody clothes. It just is ridiculous, guys. so obvious propaganda. Whether or not you think it's real, that's just blatant propaganda. None of the one, by the way, just randomly, one retweet, it's a very small account. But nonetheless, on the 29th, they wrote this. Netanyahu visited UAE and hinted false flag. So I just find that interesting. Give them credit, right? I mean, if you believe that's what happened, their opinion, I think they were correct. Now, here is, this is a provado, USA. This is from the 30th,

Starting point is 01:22:45 middle of the day. Mossad planned false flag attacks on aircraft and airports to blame Iran. Simply, same thing. Iran security agents have obtained their intelligence about a scenario allegedly proposed by Mossad to Netanyahu's office. Involving attacks on aircraft airports in the region, Fars News Agency reports. Interesting, you know, the timing of it.

Starting point is 01:23:06 Arguing this came out before, which I was unable to find, which I said doesn't mean it's not there, but a good reason to question it. In this case, an hour after. Tehran announced the discovery of Israel's anti-Iran false flag operations. So now not Fars news, but actually Iran discussing this after that. Iranian intelligence agencies have uncovered plans by Israel's National Intelligence Service Mossad to organize sabotage terrorist attacks and create humanitarian disasters in other Middle Eastern

Starting point is 01:23:33 countries. These operations were planned to be carried out under false flags when Tehran subsequently blamed for their organization. Now again, in case you forget, the origin comes back to ships in the ocean. where essentially you would attack a ship while raising the flag of your enemy. So they would think the other person was attacking them.

Starting point is 01:23:53 That's where it comes back to. So today the argument is you carry out an attack either with, you know, fake, you know, people that are proxies, other elements, but were dressed up like them, used their uniforms, all of which happened in the past, and then used that to claim that, you know,

Starting point is 01:24:06 Iran did this, even though it was you that did it. That's pretty simple. And it's very common. Their goal was to turn not only regional states against Iran, but also the international community. Seems pretty spot on. Some Israeli and American media outlets report that Mossad was indeed planning large-scale operations

Starting point is 01:24:24 aimed at regime change in Iran. Initially, a scenario was developed involving use, and this goes back to like post the beginning of the, or before the beginning of the war, this version of it. They say they developed a scenario involving Kurdish armed groups to invade Iranian territory, launching air strikes to support them and provoking internal unrest, which is literally what happened. but you could argue they're just outlining what we all know happened. As is well known, the Iraqi Kurds flatly rejected the ground invasion of Iran,

Starting point is 01:24:53 something Trump personally requested. Just interesting information. So knowing that they're accusing them of the foreknowledge, I think that's relevant to this, I do believe that this is ultimately where we are. Now, very quickly, this was the one we discovered, I went over with Charlie. So interesting timing, this is from the 30th. What we know so far about the alleged stabbing of the pilot by a co-pilot, even those two things get mixed up, by the way,

Starting point is 01:25:15 and I think even I was confusing it on the show, again, off the cuff. Now, this is basically showing the reality of it saying, one of the co-pilot stabbed the pilot and saying Netanyahu said, the Israeli officials said they were investigating a commercial plane traveling from Dubai to UAE,

Starting point is 01:25:35 forced to make an emergency landing. Yeah, raised fears of attempted hijacking. Netanyahu said one of the pilots stabbed his co-pilot appeared to be intending to crash the plane. So right out of the gate, was pushing this idea. He added that a passenger managed to, this is important because this has consistently changed,

Starting point is 01:25:51 just like we, I mean, how consistent that is with Israeli propaganda. And I mean that. He added that a passenger managed to break into the cockpit of one of the crew members, which by the way is literally, I mean,

Starting point is 01:26:05 near impossible. Those are designed so that's very difficult to do. But then the story became that the pilot did it. But it started where it was after they had dropped, But then it became before, and it kept going back and forth. I think it was the other way around. Like the narrative switch between either before it was the dive or after, if that's even how that went down.

Starting point is 01:26:24 But so my point is that Netanyahu, just like Trump lied, we'll show you that in a minute, says the passenger, the Israeli hero broke into the cockpit. And together, they neutralized the attacking pilot. Now, Netanyahu described it as an extremely severe security incident. You see my point, like same thing with the RAF one. That's exactly what they called it. Nothing ultimately happened.

Starting point is 01:26:45 Other officials, including the defense minister, called it a terrorist attack. Israel officials have identified the attacker as Omani National. Seems very interesting based on the fact that Iran and Oman are literally in the, like, basically finalizing a deal that the U.S. and Israel continue to sabotage for the straight to actually open. They claim they want. A passenger on the flight said, and Israeli, said the co-pilot tried to murder the pilot and basically carry out a suicide attack on the plane. Okay. I don't know how you would know that unless that was the narrative going around, right?

Starting point is 01:27:15 Now, generally speaking, that just, you know, that was going around. You have the terrorist attack claim in the midst of it happening. And after initial treatment, he was taken into custody by authorities, but wasn't charged. That was yesterday. And as far as I can tell, the Omani guy, is still not been charged with the crime. How was that even possible if the argument is he stabbed somebody? That seems very weird to me. But it's in, you know, again, it's up in the air.

Starting point is 01:27:41 So wait to tomorrow or the next day. but it's even the first day, why wouldn't he be charged? Is anybody disputing that there was a, you know, that you're all telling us, it was very clear. So why wouldn't he be charged? It all seems very suspect, doesn't it? Now, going into today, this was so, or actually technically a couple of things from yesterday into today that I didn't see until after the interview with Charlie. We'll go over this in a second.

Starting point is 01:28:04 This is Red Collective that this plane had just been allegedly taken over by a terrorist and plunged 14,000 feet in 29 seconds. so we're told. Yet there's no debris. I'll just play this down here with no audio so you can watch it. There's no debris on the floors. No oxygen mass drop. We'll go into that about whether that's, it's not always the case. It's a pressure thing. But it says, and passengers are so terrified. They're filming events and just walking back and forth. I don't believe it. In fact, I literally, I go as far as to say clearly not true. This is the video that was put out by Israel national news. So we'll come back to that.

Starting point is 01:28:48 On top of that, Rob Dew says, so easy a plumber can fly it. And they're just simply showing you. Now, I don't believe this was the same exact plane, but it's equivalent. And the point is, guys, it's wildly complicated.

Starting point is 01:28:59 And they do show similarities between the video. We're going to show you in a second from CNN. The idea that you would sit down and be able to do that, by the way, which is clearly, according to everybody other than Netanyahu and Trump, not what happened. Excuse me. Hickups all of a sudden.

Starting point is 01:29:13 the point here is that clearly they want you to believe the hero the plumber hero saved the day it was an Israeli fought back a terrorist attack when what it appears to be according to all the other reports that it was the other pilots that jumped in that just happened to be there which I don't believe so here's the article from Canary

Starting point is 01:29:36 Israel's fly to buy incident so ridiculous it took only hours to be dismantled despite efforts of UK media and politicians to shore it up. Here's the article. From Canary, gaping holes in Israel's flighted by false flag, pantomime mocked. Excuse me. It says supposedly the co-pilot on a flight,

Starting point is 01:29:58 stabbed the captain. Initially, Israeli narrators claimed that the plane plummeted thousands of feet, and then the stabbing took place. Then the passengers stormed the cockpit and overpowered the attacker. Excuse me. It's frustrating. Except, airliner cockpit doors are secure, as we all know. So the story changed to the badly wounded captain

Starting point is 01:30:23 managed to open the secure door from inside with his foot. Then there just happened to be two spares really pilots who were able to land safely. Now, this carefully planned terrorist attack as they frame it, were asked to believe, didn't involve the co-pilot quietly killing the captain in first and taking control of the flight while the passengers remain blissfully ignorant until too late.

Starting point is 01:30:47 Now, of course, you could always add some anomaly like he found out, but the reality would be if this was going to be something you would do, you would do with door closed, do it quietly, which you'd easily be able to do, and nobody would be the wiser. So I think that's obviously a good point. And down here it says Israel has shown itself perfectly willing, and this is very frustrating, has shown it's so perfectly willing to endanger its own people. And this is important to understand how clearly documented this is. And I myself have done it.

Starting point is 01:31:17 Israel has shown itself perfectly willing to endanger its own people in these false flags, including planting bombs and attacking Jewish businesses in Egypt to drive Jewish people to flee the colony. There's multiple examples of events like that. That's an historical example. It has shown itself perfectly willing to murder even Israeli citizens outright, slaughtering hundreds in a long day of Hannibal attacks on October 7th. And it is even willing to kill citizens of other nations, like it did on the USS Liberty in 67,

Starting point is 01:31:49 to provoke it into attacking Egypt. In the U.S. and attacking Egypt, in 1994, it bombed Jewish targets in London and blamed the attacks on Palestinian activists. Important the note. So what we're going to go through next is an article from the second, updating a few things. I frankly think that crisis initiation is really tough, and it's very hard for me to see how the United States president can get us to war with Iran. Which leads me to conclude that if, in fact, compromise is not coming, that the traditional way of America gets to war is what would be best for U.S. interests. Some people might think that Mr. Roosevelt wanted to get us into World War II, as David mentioned. you may recall we had to wait for Pearl Harbor.

Starting point is 01:32:46 Some people might think Mr. Wilson wanted to get us into World War I. You may recall he had to wait for the Lusitania episode. Some people might think that Mr. Johnson wanted to send troops to Vietnam. You may recall we had to wait for the Gulf of Tonkin episode. We didn't go to war with Spain until the U.S.S. until the Maine exploded. And may I point out that Mr. Lincoln did not feel he could call out the Federal Army until Fort Sumter was attacked, which is why he ordered the commander at Fort Summter to do exactly that thing,

Starting point is 01:33:13 the South Carolinians had said would cause an attack. So if, in fact, the Iranians aren't going to compromise, it would be best if somebody else started the war. But I would just like to suggest that one can combine other means of pressure with sanctions. I mentioned that explosion on August 17th. We could step up the pressure. I mean, look, people, irredient submarines periodically go down. someday one of them might not come up. Who would know why? We can do a variety of things if we wish to increase the pressure. I'm not advocating that, but I'm just suggesting that this is not a either or proposition of, you know, it's just sanctions has to, has to succeed or other things. We are in the game of using covert means against the Iranians.

Starting point is 01:34:07 the Iranians. We could get nasty with that. Yeah, you could argue that what he's describing there is wanting Israel to start the war so they could benefit from it. It does go both ways in that conversation. Now, Israeli officials to question co-pilot of Dubai flight, source says. It is interesting that the UAE, as much as we know, it's the way that's been manipulated normalization deals and forcing the governments to basically be, you know, regime change and

Starting point is 01:34:35 coups to get them in a place where they'll do whatever they're told or blackmail and so on. The people of these countries do not support Israel. The point is that why Israel would have the ability to interrogate him in the UAE, it's a fly Dubai to buy flight, worth pointing out, but that's not the main point. So it says, Israeli officials are expected to question the co-pilot who allegedly attempted to crash the commercial passenger flight. Think about the coercive point we just made. In fact, I was just discussing this.

Starting point is 01:35:02 I'm not going to go into it today. Let's see if I can just grab it real quick. Oh, it's a, hmm, what was it? Title. Oh, it's right down here. There it is. I'm going to go through this at least, at least kind of overview of it and then probably one of these upcoming shows, possibly.

Starting point is 01:35:30 But either way, I want to include this, I just talked about it with Charlie. The point being is that we've talked about the coercive nature of what Israel does. Like literally coercing testimony is something the UN is called it out for, like in post-October 7th and long before. And so that is what this story relates to is that this Palestinian-born mosque leader, the U.S. government is now, it's being appealed, but an immigration judge ruled they could deport him because of foreign policy grounds. He's here legally. He has no criminal record. It's all because Israel accused him of being a terrorist because he was throwing rocks and things. And he denies it. They say he threw rocks. I think it was a Maltov cocktail or threw rocks at police.

Starting point is 01:36:12 and he denies it. And the experts that they spoke on his behalf said that he was coerced. It was the same thing. And they're very clear history of doing that. Either way, the point is that has nothing to do with the U.S. policy, it doesn't matter, though. And this is important for rulings going forward based on politics. Now, in any case, the point is to recognize that Israel will coerce testimony for its own benefit, which is a very, very public and well-acknowledged reality of what they do.

Starting point is 01:36:39 So now that they're flying to Dubai, if this is a random guy, and if he's being framed somehow, that's worth considering. But it says a reserve, well, I think it says it in here. It's weird that we've gotten no more about this guy. Like, apparently, they were claiming we haven't even been able to independently verify his actual nationality. But that's just being said. I can't verify this stuff.

Starting point is 01:37:00 A reserve fly to buy pilot, a pilot crew traveling on the flight, landed the plane. So that right there challenges exactly what Trump and Netanyahu are claiming this plumber, planned the plight. We'll play that in a minute. Think about how crazy this is. It's like there just lies everywhere. But what's interesting, first or secondly, is why there would be a reserve pilot crew just waiting. It doesn't make any sense. That's not very common. But on top of that, I mean, it can happen, but it just doesn't seem, it seems unlikely. But the idea that this Omani would even be flying this flight with what they're claiming now is relevant to get into,

Starting point is 01:37:39 claiming he has evidence of radicalization and all these things on his own social media post. On top of the fact that there's no logical reason why an Omani pilot would even be flying to Israel because of their current security relations. So this all seems to be ignored or allowed. It's very October 7ish in foreign knowledge type. You'll see what I mean. The co-pilot was transferred on Thursday to the UAE where the source said Israel officials were expected to question him. The source declined to say which Israeli agency or authority would take part in the questioning. Okay.

Starting point is 01:38:10 Most of the passengers on board were Israeli nationals. Netanyahu on Thursday said that the co-pilot, whom he identified as an Omani national, Netanyahu did, had undergone radical Islamist indoctrination and was clearly suicidal. But you let him fly. What? I mean, but it's not him letting him, but you'll see when we get into it. Like this is, Israel would have to allow this to be able to fly there with as the pilot. But it says, but that was, but that's so far.

Starting point is 01:38:39 far a motive for his actions has not been established. Israel does not have official diplomatic relations with Oman. And Netanyahu has said pilots from such countries were not permitted to operate flights to Israel. It was not clear how the co-pilot came to be assigned to that flight. But C now starts to add up, right? More points in that direction. The aircraft plunged some 16,625 feet in just over 30 seconds.

Starting point is 01:39:04 We'll get into that. It either didn't happen the way they're framing it or, I mean, we'll get into it. There's clearly there's something that they're all lying about, whether it was less distance or, I mean, something. Because it just impossible what they're framing with numerous things we can see. The co-pilot's identity has not been disclosed publicly beyond his nationality. From Netanyahu, I guess, because Oman hasn't commented. It seems like this is like very Tyler Robinish, too, Robinson is, like where we just never get more follow up. It's weird.

Starting point is 01:39:35 But on top of that, by the way, back to this saying that, uh, The motive for his actions haven't been established. This is my point. Netanyahu will happily say that to Reuters, but then go to Israel and say it was another 9-11. But you just said you haven't established the motives. Why would you think 9-11? Clearly, they're playing it both way. That's what they do.

Starting point is 01:39:54 Now, continuing on that, Brett Erickson points this out. First of all, Lazare Berman says, and Israeli official said this to him. He's a correspondent with Times of Israel. Omani Pilot asked Amradi crew to kill him. Quote, his social media accounts talk clearly that he was, that he has been radicalized into jihadist ideology. He talks about killing Jews. Israel will be part of this investigation. So that's what they're telling Israel's officials, which like, like they breathe, are talking to this reporter and saying that that's what they found out or what they can see is social media

Starting point is 01:40:35 shows that. So Brett rightly asks, I'm sorry, you're telling me his social media accounts clearly highlight that he'd been radicalized to jihadism and the air which by the way jihadism is a term we shouldn't even be for it's jihad means revolt or you know the end of the day it would arguably mean extremism is what they're trying to say jihad is a word you should look up and understand it could mean any number of things doesn't necessarily mean terrorist attack in fact most often cases it does not it's a fight it's a struggle for god is essentially what it would mean against any number of things they make this term about it anyway it's about being educated and understand what this means not just screaming like helen musk does about whatever you're told to say but it says

Starting point is 01:41:16 that he social media had clearly shown that he'd been radicalized and the airline just let him keep flying or didn't do its due diligence even though you're the I mean think about the likelihood of that with who we're talking about it says this story is filled with narrative of holes. Maybe all these oddities, each of which have low likelihoods just against all odds, took place. That's objectivity. I agree. It's certainly possible. But to be taking this narrative right now at face value is absurd. I agree. Here is what was Al Jazeera, I believe, has to say it's Indian, oh, no, excuse me. Well, maybe it was. Either way, Indian journalist, Palki Sharma has a point talking about the very same point, the Omani, the likelihood that Israel would have allowed this,

Starting point is 01:42:03 which speaks to the fact that it was deliberately allowed, or rather the possibility that it was deliberately allowed. Omani pilot on the crew in the first place. We ask because Israel has some of the strictest aviation protocols. Pilots who belong to unfriendly countries are not allowed in. These are countries that don't have ties with Israel or adversarial countries. Their pilots are barred from flying into the country. Now, Israel and Oman do not have diplomatic relations.

Starting point is 01:42:31 So how was this man allowed? Like I said, they have very strict protocols. Israel's internal security agencies called Shinbet. They vet all personnel on airlines flying into Israel from the UA. It is part of the agreement between the two countries, that all personnel will be vetted by the Israeli agencies. So was this a security lapse, or is there more to this? And then he's lying there now.

Starting point is 01:42:58 he's this attacker and he calls out to the to the air crew kill me kill me all right so it's clear he was suicidal that's not a question it was clear he was yeah yeah but it's a question because anything that njahou ever says should be questioned or really anything any politician anywhere says should be questioned because these people lie like they breathe and now now we're taking numerous data points that what you should recognize is that all All of the corporate media and all these fake players all take it face value. Even though anybody with a brain, whether you agree and side with there or not, would realize that these people lie consistently. And my point would be that you can't go forward on a narrative as if we know for sure because Netanyahu says it.

Starting point is 01:43:45 Who is citing these things? Have we having any investigation other than what Israel says? I mean, it's ridiculous on its face to pretend like we don't know these people lie for a living. Let me preface these remarks with I never, never, ever believe Israeli figures. I've been in the government too long to know that the Israelis are patent liars. In their intelligence community, in their propaganda community, certainly, and in their leadership, they are inveterate liars. Let me say that again.

Starting point is 01:44:21 They are liars. So you can't believe anything that comes out of Jerusalem. be vetted by the Israeli agencies. So was this a security lapse, or is there more to this? And then he's lying there now. He's this attacker. And he calls out to the air crew, kill me. Kill me, all right?

Starting point is 01:44:50 So it's clear he was suicidal. That's not a question. It was clear. He was going to down that plane. Oh, it's not clear, but it looks very likely that he was going to down the plane. and with all the passengers in. Which brings us to the last question. Was this a lone wolf attack?

Starting point is 01:45:07 Or was there a bigger terror plot here? Now it's too early for a concrete answer. The UA is investigating the case. After all, it happened on their flight. Fly Dubai is owned by the Dubai government. So they are the ones investigating. They're checking if it was linked to terrorist activity. Now, Israel is also looking at another question.

Starting point is 01:45:28 Was there a link to Iran? on. Netanyahu says it's too early to say, but he adds that they will know in a few days. I think it's true. Yeah. In English to the American audience, I think we have to wait and be objective and be clear. And then it goes to Israel and says, they're terrorists, they murder our families, and it was 9-11, right? This is a very consistent discrepancy between what he says in Hebrew to the people in Israel. And even though we can all look and prove and say that, it's just, it's about, it's about meeting the people that don't care to look. or rather reaching the people that don't care to look.

Starting point is 01:46:05 Early to say whether he had any connections with Iran or with anyone else, it's too early to say that. But we'll be able to say that very definitely, I think fairly definitively. Not fairly. I think we'll be able to say definitively within a matter of days. Well, that was certainly clumsy, even for him. I mean, at the end of the day, guys, what Trump said, I mean, this is my point about Trump. He came out right out of the gate and was very quickly leaning towards Iran because that's what they were supposed to do.

Starting point is 01:46:34 And Trump likes to be ahead of the curve, even though he doesn't deserve to be, likes to throw himself out there. You know, this is my point, guys. And so here is what he threw out there because Netanyahu said, while he's basically laughing the entire time, it's embarrassing. And just in case you were confused, no, they weren't steering wheels. They weren't around steering wheels on old planes. Who knows why he makes these things up. But here's what he said. I forgot to grab it.

Starting point is 01:47:01 Let's see. And this is the one we played with Charlie. That's right. That was the first time we played it. And it's basically just Trump relaying exactly what Netanyahu told him about what happened. And the reason it's important is not just because he'll blindly repeat what Netanyahu tells him, but because the story itself has already fallen apart from yesterday. And it just makes you wonder.

Starting point is 01:47:31 That's funny. It looks like my Instagram video ended itself. Gotta love the way censorship works today. here's the video of Donald Trump. It's running slow back here. So here we go. Oh, wait, that's not it. There it is.

Starting point is 01:47:53 Come on. Sorry, guys, everything's free. A plumber, an Israeli plumber, never flew a plane, was rarely in planes, very rarely flew. An Israeli plumber saw what was happening and strong, you know, when you lift pipe all day, you stroke. Yeah, he so... Lift pipe all day.

Starting point is 01:48:14 It's so stupid. What was going on? He heard the screaming. He was toward the front where you had security in the back. You know, you had security and you had another flight crew, but they didn't have time.

Starting point is 01:48:26 The plane was going sharply down at an unbelievable angle, so sharp that the... Remember, the rest of the media is claiming that those pilots landed the plane, not the plumber. Rudder ripped off the back of the plane. The plane wasn't designed to go at a speed anywhere near that. And so it was well beyond its limits.

Starting point is 01:48:43 and he ripped with the G-forces as they were. He ripped this guy out of the seat, threw him back. The crowd got him. The passengers. So, case you're confused, he's saying that he did this while it was diving. Just so that's clear.

Starting point is 01:48:59 Even though there's discrepancy by numerous people on the plane, amongst themselves discrepancies, which says something that they can have a different story about what happened. And then between Netanyahu, between Trump, between other people that are reporting on this. again this is why a lot of us start to go is this supposed to be like this it's or you know we deserve better siops he's got him grabbed him and having never flown apart a plane he took the stick lifted it up and leveled out the plane before it crashed there you could argue this is the story

Starting point is 01:49:36 that i heard i don't know if it's pause for god sorry i clicked that like what five seconds the frame started talking. This is how this platform works for me. But so again, I guess I should just let it play, huh? The point is the stick discrepant? It's not, it's not, it's like that half round kind of weird, but it's still ultimately a less thing you pull, right? But apparently I understand that that's not even the reality of what would have been done

Starting point is 01:49:59 right there. But you could argue that Trump is the one just relaying what he thinks that meant or as usual embellishing in ways he wants to that aren't necessary because I guess that's what sociopaths do. They just like to lie about random things. It's like a tick. Who knows? It's true. That's the story that I got from BB and from a couple of probably early.

Starting point is 01:50:23 I don't know if you've heard that story yet. I've laughed about with Charlie. I bet you that didn't exist. Beebe told him that. And then he felt the need to be like, let's just make it sound like it was more real than it was, more people. But listen to the way he says this. It's a story that I got from BB and from a couple of probably early.

Starting point is 01:50:43 I don't know if you've heard this. And a couple of probably early, I don't know if you heard that story. A couple of probably earlier, I don't know what now. Did you mean to say other people? And, well, wait, you know, like, I just don't get what we don't.

Starting point is 01:50:56 I mean, this guy should be a laughing stock. That's, I mean, come on. I mean, and this is not about political hating left, right? It's just like this guy is making all of us look stupid. If that's even, even though most people realize they don't represent us, I would like to believe. But it's just,

Starting point is 01:51:13 It's just embarrassing. You don't know he's not, you can't clearly discern that he's lying. Anyway. I think it's an amazing. So a plumber never flew a plane, strong guy, lift him up, throw him back. The crowd was,

Starting point is 01:51:29 was, they knew they were going to die shortly because the G-forces, but they were able to hold him because he was going crazy. And he was crazy. And this plumber never had. Is how you relayed the story and got the facts.

Starting point is 01:51:43 No, he told you this. But he was crazy because we know that somehow, right? Having flown a plane had the sense to lift a stick. Who was it? And you know, it's not like planes are different today. He used to have... I mean, look at this, guys. What do you mean the sense to lift the stick?

Starting point is 01:51:57 Like, if anybody anywhere has watched any movie in their lifetime, that's probably what they would do. So it's just a stupid art. You're trying to like make it sound like it all lines up. And you're just showing... It's like when it describes why most people don't know there's a B in the word dumb. It's like, do you really think that?

Starting point is 01:52:13 I mean, is this your level of higher intel? Like, you're so superior. It's just, it's crazy. I don't know. You can decide. But the idea being that this is something that they, and it's not even the reality of what it looks like, though. So he's making up a false story on top of the false story

Starting point is 01:52:28 to just to make his part of it seem unique. And then 30 seconds later, we're all moved on going, that's not true. What he said wasn't even part of it. And we all just let that go. Like, it's just, it's crazy. A little serious will. Today, they fly differently.

Starting point is 01:52:42 Oh, here they. And when I asked why he did that, he said he watches that show air disasters. You know the show? It's that crazy. I never want to watch it because I watch it. I don't like watching it because I watch it. I mean, it's not like these are important things, but it's such like such like it's a tick. Like lying. It just has to, I don't understand it.

Starting point is 01:53:08 You know the show is that crazy. I never want to watch it because I watch it. I don't like what you. it because bad things happen but he said he watches it a lot and he learned from watching that show yeah so it's almost it's almost laughable how believable that story is how believable that story is how to fly i mean you tell me this is the craziest thing and then shortly thereafter the pilots you know that were there case to have emergency didn't come fly the plane while the plumber while it was diving did instead and even though the door of

Starting point is 01:53:43 allegedly was unlocked after it was diving. He somehow was in there already landing the plane for the pilots that were there. Solid. And these planes and the security guys if they were in the back of the plane, they came up, they took over the plane.

Starting point is 01:53:59 Oh yeah. I think it's the most amazing, sir. Did he want to crash? A plumber. I mean, it's not even worth giving credence to, guys. It's just silly. It's embarrassing. And I mean,

Starting point is 01:54:12 literally everybody seems to know that. even his supporters that just kind of don't want to talk about it. So, here first, as Vanessa Bealey shows, according to a notorious Zionist telegram channel, this is what actually happened. Buckle up, ladies and gents, Hollywood beckons. Logical for a random person, plumber or not, to immediately just decide to step into that. Wouldn't you be like, is anybody a pilot? It's like, I'm going to jump into this thing.

Starting point is 01:55:24 I don't understand. at all? Or I guess because he watches a TV show, he thinks, I mean, I guess. Who knows? Who knows what people think? So the fact that's being posted like a real thing to praise what happened is apparently what they're claiming is pretty damn ridiculous. So now, next one, let's talk about the real video. So you saw that, right? So this is a video shared by Israel National News.

Starting point is 01:56:07 Israeli passengers, and they're framing the time frame, like we just saw, right, rush to the cockpit to rescue the fly to buy flight after the co-pilot attempted to hijack it. This is what they're claiming this video shows. Here you go. I don't know. For me, it didn't show up until just now, so let me roll it back. I can't tell if you guys see it. Got a lot about this one. By the way, the light from the top of the front window, okay?

Starting point is 01:57:10 Literally what they posted, guys, that's the media, showing you, allegedly when they rescued them from the pilot. Now look, you could argue this, this is why I was saying this, that something happened. Maybe these pilots hated each other. Maybe there were, who knows, maybe somebody hired him to kill. kill him. I mean, it's, I'm just making things up. My point would be that something could have driven to some kind of altercation. There's been historical events where those things have happened. I was reading one about a Japanese pilot that like lost his mind and tried to fly into the ground.

Starting point is 01:57:52 And they had like, it's crazy. These things happen. The point though is that if that's the way it went down, then they've just decided to use it and just manufacture this entire story. It's sort of like, let's take a step back and remember the lie that Trump told us about the Marine they tried to rescue. Do we all remember that lie? Did that guy, I mean, I can't believe I haven't followed back up on that. That guy was an AI image that never existed as far as I could tell. Or they let him die and used that as cover for the operation that they failed in conducting. You remember that story?

Starting point is 01:58:24 So realize how crazy it is. They can manufacture an entire narrative. Even Abbott, Greg Abbott from Texas, literally shared that image of the Marine and the plane coming back. It was AI. He deleted it. So if they're willing to make up an entire story, and then never follow back up on it, let's realize that that's kind of about where we are

Starting point is 01:58:43 with the propaganda. So it could be that they just said, let's just literally make this entire story up and let it ride. I guess we'll continue. We'll find out. So here is what James Lee had to say, and you've probably seen this going around.

Starting point is 01:58:56 Now, I will include the full, at least from the clip that I found, it's about five minutes. It seems to be the largest clip going around. You could probably find the original CNN broadcast. The point is that in this five-minute clip, I was going to play the entire thing, for you to make sure you got, you know, there's no trick of context.

Starting point is 01:59:12 But it's really not worth. Like, watch it for yourself. It's included. It's five minutes, four seconds. There's a lot in it that kind of is just about waffling. And what James points to is generally the important part. But I want to make sure I included it so you can watch it. If you want to see, she's going over it with him.

Starting point is 01:59:28 And this is a pilot and it's co-pilot in a flight simulator discussing the reality of these claims. And they go over a few different things that you probably find somewhat relevant. But the main point is what he goes into right here. So some of the numbers that were seen from the reporting initially are they don't make sense to me because if you're dissenting that rapidly, the aircraft would have disintegrated completely. Right. So if it was, if it could have been, if it was, if it was, if it would have disintegrated at going to the speed you said, you could simply argue that they reported it wrong, that somebody relayed the wrong information. Just again, always to which we should be objective, but that's not what I think is the reality here. But I'm simply highlighting that that's something usually, it's not always that it's that.

Starting point is 02:00:13 If it's not that, then it's this, right? It could just be that that data's wrong. And so it wasn't that. Or that Israel lied about that, like I'm saying, to bolster out a story that wasn't necessarily all created. Right. But the more this continues, it is, I argue, increasingly feeling like this might have been literally constructed. But in Israeli flight, largely Israelis, as we get into some of the narratives from people on the flight, that's where I start to feel that more.

Starting point is 02:00:36 Because at that point, then what is this person, like, we talked about October 6th, Evan's stuff, right? I mean, IDF members were lying about babies on clothes lines and babies and Evans. Now, was that all coordinated? I think so. That's how that makes sense to me. They were put to it as intelligence, but it could literally be that you just have Israelis

Starting point is 02:00:55 that are lying for the agenda. And so you wonder whether that's driving that. Maybe that's something they're taught in school for all we know. And I'm not making that about Jews or even all Israelis, but the process through which the Israeli government manipulates their population, just like the American government does in our school. system, right? But thinking about that, it's worth considering that that might be something we're talking

Starting point is 02:01:15 about. Now, back to this point. You don't make sense to me because if you're dissenting that rapidly, the aircraft would have disintegrated completely. Did CNN just accidentally debunk on air an alleged Israeli false flag operation? There we are with the fly to buy. That's the 800 model right there. And right there is the overspeed warning. And I'm going to just get my hand in here if I can and start pointing a little bit on the screen. If you can see my hand on the left side of that screen right there, there's the Barber pole indicating the over speed. We are looking at nothing but ground on the primary display on the additive care. And they jet.

Starting point is 02:01:53 If you can take a look in the center of your screen, that is approximately what we would have seen. We are now recovering at about 18, 17, 16,000 feet, perhaps a little more of a dive than the aircraft in today. I know there were some people. They said they were sort of standing by the bathroom, right? They would have fallen immediately. I mean, frankly, it's miraculous with something like that, that, that, that, people didn't get more seriously injured or die. That's correct.

Starting point is 02:02:17 I'm answering a stick shaker. It's the over speed warning that's clicking away in the background, not the stick shaker. Stick shakers at the other end of the spectrum where you're stalling the aircraft. So that is still going. We are just coming into about 500 knots. So some of the numbers that we're seeing

Starting point is 02:02:33 from the reporting initially are they don't make sense to me because if you're descending that rapidly, the aircraft would have disintegrated completely. So the numbers will change when we get the preliminary report. That's interesting. Because that, those,

Starting point is 02:02:45 I mean, as you point out, those are only the numbers that we have right now, but interesting that you said that that could have caused. Yeah, way to reassert the unknown thought

Starting point is 02:02:53 that we can't verify. Well, because it's going to change once we get the, well, how do you know that? Maybe it doesn't, and they continue to lie.

Starting point is 02:03:00 You know, this is how propaganda, media works. But at the end of the day, it seems likely somebody's lying. Because those things have been considered, I mean, you realize these pilots are back.

Starting point is 02:03:10 Like, they can get reports, but these are things coming from people involved, at least as we're being told. So it seems pretty, it seems like people are lying, guys. And I think that's pretty obvious. It's a break apart. And that maybe some of those are a little higher than actually happened. We do know there was damage on the rudder, right, from whatever the speeds actually will turn out to be.

Starting point is 02:03:30 And portions of it apparently tore away during flight. Now, obviously, with serious damage to the rudder, a plane's going to crash. So when you just look at what we know here, how fortunate do you think it is that this plane was actually even able to safely land? It's so fortunate and so unbelievable that it might just be a Hollywood production. This is Hollywood on steroids. You can't make this up. You can't believe that it actually happens in real life, but it did. Now, the guy in that clip, if you watch the longer one,

Starting point is 02:04:03 one other point that I would say is probably relevant. He talks about the rudder and kind of the idea that once that were to have happened, that I guess I think he said a hydraulic fluid. But if you watch the clip, he has an issue where he confuses the two things. And he goes, no, excuse me, I meant the other one. But basically whatever that would be for playing experts, the fluid that would come out because of that rudder fell off, he says would make it very quickly near impossible to actually continue to fly.

Starting point is 02:04:26 And so you just, you know, it's worth noting that in how this all went down. But going forward, oh, this was the, I'll include the longer clip. You can watch that for yourself. Rabbi Jeff says, hey, Grock, concise, no spin. could a passenger walk normally to the cockpit while a Boeing 737 is nose diving 14,000 feet and 30 seconds, making normal movement almost impossible, you know, whatever, yes or no? No, which I don't think we need to be proven, right? I don't think we need to have them tell you that. The point is that the narrative is that they did that while it was falling. That's what they keep

Starting point is 02:05:05 reasserting. That's why I want to show you the mainstream article that makes it clear that from their investigation, that's not even close to what's happening. But, get both things are still being promoted. One from the president of the United States and the president of the, or rather the prime minister of Israel and then everybody yells, it seems. Here is a Israeli passenger. Daniel Lambert says, filmed it with a selfie video, knew somehow that it was a terrorist attack. Skin on her face was peeling away with G-Force, but a plumber walked to the cockpit and took

Starting point is 02:05:35 control. Wait for it, cherry on top. She was on her way going to the October 7th Memorial. Here's what she said. This is the moment Miriam Okayon realized something was terribly wrong on board the fly Dubai flights. Screaming like, I can't forget it, like the screaming. What exactly were people screaming about? The unknown, the flight being up and down.

Starting point is 02:06:07 I mean, right now, the heart's going to scream and they seem pretty stable. So what are we screaming about? I mean, maybe just the fact that the guy had a bloody shirt. Like, that would make sense. right, the fact that you don't know what's going on, I can see that, but it just wanted to point it out. Like, it seems like a interesting point, you know, that people are blood-curdling screams.

Starting point is 02:06:24 And the other video, people were wandering back and walking up. Like, even if, like, I mean, Theo, calm, they were walking into the door and looking at it. Apparently that was when that was happening. And somebody walks out with a little bit blood in their jam. Somebody, would you expect that kind of a scream? No, maybe. Just think that's strange, pointing out the anomalies, I see.

Starting point is 02:06:43 It's terrifying. As passengers scream, she starts to pray. Okay. For some reason, right now, when she does this, she starts to smile. You could decide if that's weird. I think it stands out. She starts to pray. The plane is plummeting thousands.

Starting point is 02:07:05 You tell me that's not a laugh. Somebody's smiling. I find that very, very out of character with what anybody would be doing in that moment. The plane is plummeting. Look at that. Does that make sense to anybody? Someone just screamed bloody murder. This is on the media.

Starting point is 02:07:33 Thousands of feet. The plane is out to shaking. Now, I want to be clear, by the way, I made this point every time. Doesn't mean it means one thing or the other. It's a valid point to make. It's not fair to judge how somebody would react in any situation. act weird. Whether someone dies and they laugh, that is possible. You know, whether or not it's related to politics. Now, that's not the same as saying we should assume that means one thing or the

Starting point is 02:07:57 other. I'm very skeptical. My gut tells me that does not make sense. But it's still fair to point out that maybe that's just how she reacts when she's scared. That is a, that is a fair thing to consider. But you heard my opinion. I don't know how to explain you, but like, Dave. plane is plummeting thousands of feet. The plane starts to shaking. I don't know how to explain it, but like diving down really fast. And we feel that like on my face is like going down. She's talking about G-Force, which by all accounts, there's no evidence of.

Starting point is 02:08:35 Did you see the video? Or at least when they said it happened, which is why I'm pointing out that it might be more of a use of sci-op of opportunity. Because what we're talking, maybe they just manufactured the way this was supposed to be seen and ultimately it didn't die, but, you know, it got crazy for a minute, but didn't die. I mean, I don't know.

Starting point is 02:08:52 I just, that's my point is there's clear discrepancies here. How is it possible? They were able to walk up on what Israel 7 showed you when was what they told you it was supposed to be diving, and she's saying she had G-Force pulling her face back. I mean, we just saw a video where she was sitting plainly in her seat without that. Who knows? I feel that it was very scary.

Starting point is 02:09:12 After a few minutes, we know that it's a terrorist attack. That's clear, right? We always immediately assume it's a terrorist attack. I thought I'm going to die. The 23-year-old had been backpacking in Asia and was flying back to Israel for the October 7th Memorial. Her brother, Eviatar, a soldier, was killed in the Hamas attack. and she feared her head.

Starting point is 02:09:40 And that, you know, considering Hannibal directive and all that. But so this is interesting, right? So now you're talking about a tie back to the entire thing that literally ties back to Iran and the conversation. Remember, they're telling you Iran and Hamas is a proxy for Iran. So we're thinking about how you see

Starting point is 02:09:56 how this all interconnects with the narratives that are being spun. We're about to lose another child. I can't do this for my mom. My mom waiting for me in the airport. She just want to see me after 10 months. I can't to die. I can't.

Starting point is 02:10:16 The investigation is still ongoing into the motive. But for passengers, this had the hallmarks of a terror attack. It's the bottom of his shoes so you can see not the two things, the glass of water and the bottom of his shoes, both of which are being pointed to. And I'll show you why. But just so you can see it in a live video. So you know it's not altered. That's important. I hear like someone's.

Starting point is 02:10:40 like something happened and one Israeli guy he ran to the cockpit and saw what happened so he like begging for people come to help him that's not at all what we were hearing right with the story is very different from I mean almost everybody if we're going to be fair right now or rather clear everyone seems to have a little bit of a discrepancy with the way they frame this and I saw the blood on the people so I saw I knew something very wrong happened. How would he know something wrong was happening if he ran from the back and nobody's up there and we don't know?

Starting point is 02:11:17 Maybe they didn't know. Us and all of us going to die. That's what everyone feels like. We're going to die. We're going to crush. Everybody felt like. I mean, just like, look, these kind of statements do not line up for me. That's not the way, how you're going to speak for what everybody felt.

Starting point is 02:11:35 Maybe they got together and talked about it afterward. See, now, some people don't like that I do that. that's important. I'm not saying that's what I think, but clearly you could argue as an intelligent person that that's possible, right? They all gathered afterward and they, God, we're alive. Were you scared? I was scared. We all felt they were going to die, too. Now, I don't think that's the reality. That feels unlikely, certainly possible. The reason that's important to do is to just show, we need to be objective and making sure it's not all, you know, but at the end of the day, I feel like, somebody saying that seems to be the way

Starting point is 02:12:06 that we're supposed to be framing that. Now, you could even argue that she really, experienced this but then sat and talked to Netanyahu before she did this interview. Any number of ways you could read this guys and that's something we've seen continued to happen. And dying because someone want to kill us. Miraculously two reserve pilots were on board. Miriam says her sense of relief when they landed in Saudi Arabia. So it wasn't the plumber. So we're clear on that. It was overwhelming. All the time when we've been on the plane,

Starting point is 02:12:40 It was scary because we didn't know, like, if there is another people in the team, team plane, want to attack. So. You realize that at this moment, while they're on that plane, nobody has any information. All you know is that this guy tried to, you know, at the very least, so they fought in the cockpit. That's what you know. There was even an early discrepancy. Was it an axe, a knife?

Starting point is 02:13:06 Was it any, was it even a weapon? So you're on this plane and you somehow. Or is it a, was there more terrorist that are trying to attack us? I mean, you could see a way in which that might be, like a lot of people think that way with the 9-11 overlap. But again, I'm just pointing these things out. And it feels like a construct, a lot of these things don't like one or another, but all of them, it just doesn't line up for me. Just being honest. Oh, we like suspicious all the people, all the team.

Starting point is 02:13:37 But it was. Meaning the people, the team. The people fly in the plane. I think that's interesting. That's how I would take that. You could decide she has language barrier. So remember, this was a co-pilot, right? So now they're going, well, what about the stewardesses?

Starting point is 02:13:52 What about everybody else in the plane? You know, they're Muslims, aren't they? Are they from UAE? You know, it's like just a weird, relevant, I think. Now, back to this. The timing just does not line up. What she filmed, what you saw with that image, it doesn't. Now, here's another example.

Starting point is 02:14:11 So based on everyone's account, they did some massive dive, right? Well, this is kind of funny, but Mr. Beast debunks the Israeli Sciop. In very similar circumstances, they dive the plane because, guys, if you understand this, even how astronauts will train, you can take a regular plane and dive it down and you'll create a zero-gravity environment. But at the very least, people will fall out of their chairs. They will, or that girl will get to that allegedly was in the bathroom, would have flown to the top, knocked to the, I mean, she would have been hurt.

Starting point is 02:14:38 and we'll show you some parallel images of previous flights that did far less than what they're claiming this one did. In fact, I don't think I even grabbed the one of the nurse with the bloody face, but I'll show you the way the plane looks. But first, this is what happens in a real example like this. This company will fly you up and then nose down. So some of the numbers have ever seen from you up. I was trying to close that and I hit it on an accident. Up and then nose dot.

Starting point is 02:15:10 creating a zero gravity environment inside the plane the 250,000 experience starts now. Oh my water! Oh my God! What is going on? I'm saying out. Oh my God. Oh, I can't stop loading. Go long.

Starting point is 02:15:33 You get the point. But they're all calmly standing in the aisleway. One guy calmly goes, let me, let me get in there and let me look and see what's going on, you know, very, very, very, very seriously in the midst of a terrorist stack. So here is the example I was talking about. Now, yeah, I didn't. The other one I didn't grab. They're all going around.

Starting point is 02:15:55 You can find them. This is specifically an example of the Singapore airline plane. Look at the example. This is the senator from Australia saying, relieved to confirm that at least two Australians were on this flight are safe on home. Okay. And this one says, Penny, on the left is a Singapore airline plane after 54 minute plunge two years, or 54 meter plunge two years ago.

Starting point is 02:16:16 cabin damage, passengers, injured from hitting the ceiling, face mask deployed. Look at that. Compared to their flight. It just doesn't line up, guys. Now, importantly, important understand, I still argue that I think that it would have dropped in this circumstance. I'm not an expert, so you can listen to people out there claiming to be experts. But the argument about the gas mask is important, or rather the, you know, whatever you call those mask, because that's specific to a pressure change.

Starting point is 02:16:45 It's not just when the plane drops, but I argue that those things have. happened based on certain circumstances just in case. And you can look that up. And so the point I think is that that I think it would have happened if their circumstances they claim happened happened. Because in this case, less than what they claim happened and the mass dropped. And I think it's important to see that. But to be clear, it is about a pressure change, which is supposed to be the main point that triggers it. And that's, they're arguing that's not necessarily what happened. I don't see why. Think about how much they dropped. That's literally impossible as far as I'm concerned. But that's the big discrepancy. Some part of this story is the lie, and we're all starting to see that.

Starting point is 02:17:23 You can decide which one, but clearly something doesn't line up. Now, Netanyahu, of course, meets the guy on the 30th, right? And what I thought stood out the most, which is just insane, is that this guy literally goes to meet Netanyahu with his bloody shirt. I mean, look, the only way this makes sense is they said, keep the bloody clothes on. It'll work. Right. It'll gain super empathy because you're going to get off that plane and you're going to want to go take a shower. You're going to want to go take your dirty, bloody clothes off, not rush to go speak to the prime minister, but see, there's clearly look at the picture. Look at my bloody sock. Okay. Net Yao confirms. Fly to buy pilot conducted stabbing.

Starting point is 02:18:05 Praises passengers heroism. So I just said, this guy literally met with Netanyahu while still wearing his bloody clothes. Come on, guys. So on that point, I don't have to play this necessarily, but so this is Daniel Lambert, we create a pretend world. We're a global production company. We write the screenplay. We're the directors. We're the producers.

Starting point is 02:18:25 We're the main actors. The world is our stage. As you know, that's the clip we played many, many, many times. Might as well play it to. The point, guys, obviously, is that this is an example of how they conduct these, you know, whatever, theater acts, illusions. And so in this case, this is how he's describing what they do.

Starting point is 02:18:47 Did they buy it from? or I think they were buying it from. We have an incredible array of possibilities of creating foreign companies that have no way being traced back to Israel, shell companies over shell companies who affect the supply chain to our favor. We create a pretend world.

Starting point is 02:19:07 We are a global production company. We write the screenplay. We're the directors, we're the producers, we're the main actors, the world is our stage. Did you see any surprises and gossip? So, interestingly, the independent puts an article out yesterday that says the fly to buy hijacking attempt as if we see, you know, this is what it kills me.

Starting point is 02:19:33 Is that what it is? Literally on the first of October, independent journalist, you're going to pretend like you can write that as an absolute fact? We don't know what happened. Even Netanyahu pretended he wasn't clear on the first. But yet you write, that has to be obvious. even though they write this, though, afterward. The fly Dubai hijacking attempt serves only one man's interests, Israeli prime minister seeking re-election.

Starting point is 02:19:59 So what's funny about that, and it's like a double-edged sword. On one side of it, you're admitting that they use events like this, but within that argument, you're solidifying in some people's minds that it literally was an Iran hijacking attempt. See how that works? Even though that's not, you know, who knows that you can, I don't know which one would upset them more. Either way, it's important to recognize that even they can see the, as he writes,

Starting point is 02:20:22 Quibono. As Afgardian highlights, it's an interesting headline and further evidence that the press actually does understand the principle of Caboono, basically who benefits? They just pretend not to most of the time. Here is Shail Ben Ephraim saying the new element in the false flag, Saip. Now they're claiming the Omani terrorists to hijack the plane, brought several free Palestine leaflets and publications on the plane. Doubtless, he hid them.

Starting point is 02:20:47 next to the axe he brought on the plane so he would have something to read in downtime. Now, again, the axe was an original earlier narrative about maybe being one of the axes they have on the plane for rescue or whatever. I'm still hearing knife. It's like, again, this all up in the air is all over the place. But here is a diplomatic correspondent. Breaking an Emirati source reveals that among the belongings of the Omani co-pilot, they're talking about, by the way, in his home.

Starting point is 02:21:11 I'll show you that next. Not on the plane. He just misunderstood were publications from free Palestine groups. as well as pro-pile. So who cares? What does that have to do with anything? The insinuation is, oh, that means he's a terrorist. And if you like Palestine, you're going to stab your co-pilot or, you know, stab the pilot. It's just ridiculous. Now, you could argue the guy did any of this, but the idea that because he believes in palace, like, okay, if you want to make an argument that would actually make sense, maybe it's because he recognizes that Israel is committing a genocide

Starting point is 02:21:40 and he supports those people. But then why would the argument be stab an Indian pilot? It doesn't make any sense, guys. There's no real, this is so obviously a construct of some kind. But it says the pilot had repeatedly expressed support for Palestinians and hostility towards Israel. Okay, so the argument is killed the Indian pilot and then crashed the plane into Israel. Then why did it happen the way it did? Couldn't you, like you said, done this quietly. There's plenty of anomalies here. But it just doesn't line up again, the idea being that you would then crash the plane into Israel to as an Omani. I mean, you can walk through. this in a lot of different ways.

Starting point is 02:22:17 To me, the evidence already doesn't back this up, so they're adding on to this idea like we've seen before. This is consistent, they write with the bomber investigation, which is examining the co-pilots Islamic radicalization. Okay. Here is a journalist, very generous, this is, you know, in quotes, going into this person's apartment. Wait a minute, this is today.

Starting point is 02:22:43 So hold on. you're suggesting that while this is an ongoing investigation and they're still flushing this out, that a so-called journalist from the Daily Wire wandered through this person's home and just happened to find his ID. And doesn't that seem familiar? You know, it really should. You know why? Because it keeps happening. This is from Omar Mateen's apartment.

Starting point is 02:23:06 Remember the Orlando shooting, 2016? If we continue in here, we'll find the kitchen with an ID card that belongs to Mr. Matine. Oh, but look, and here's the Quran. Oh, look, and here's his outlining of, okay. Guys, it's embarrassing. Look at the passport, 9-11, it just happened to not burn a lot. Cool. They think we're this stupid.

Starting point is 02:23:25 Now, that doesn't have to mean every other part of this is fake, but this kind of thing, guys, is ridiculous to me. You know how many other events we have? Like, Tyler Robbins is a good example because did we get this kind of thing? Did we get immediate reports and investigations and follow up through his home in his apartment? No, we got a blackout because they don't want you to, look at it. This, when they want you to look, should make you skeptical.

Starting point is 02:23:50 We're here inside the New Orleans terrorist home. You can see that it's been clearly destroyed the door, at least from the FBI raid yesterday. But if we walk through the home, we see some signs of what he was up to. He had this work area here, lots of different chemicals laid round and different electronics. This is again a work setup, left receipts, just very unkempt in here. If we go over here actually, you can see the Department of Justice documents here,

Starting point is 02:24:35 the search warrant and the property that they recorded here, which seems to be a lot of chemicals. Again, just left in district. array. There's a bedroom back here and his what appears to be his collection of religious materials, his Qurans, an open Quran with a passage there, as well as even the Bible here, but mostly books on Islam and his prayer rug just to the... By the way, I mixed up the framing on this guys. I had it lined up with other events. This is not connected to that event. So I apologize about that. Hold on one second. Let me get this lined up again. So that's confusing and that's completely

Starting point is 02:25:22 my fault. Basically, I had a couple of extra events that I added in. Let me show you right now. And this one just I had lined up wrong. I did it to myself. But nonetheless, this is still wildly relevant we're talking about. But just to be clear for the podcast in particular, let me get this back up. Here we go. So basically, here's what we're looking at for this. There's two events that I want to follow up on basically now, but I'll, I'll, I'm going to push it down at the end after this. So this is related to this here and these other events that are related. Right now you have this on today.

Starting point is 02:25:55 Two Iranians charged in the UK over alleged terrorism plot on a separate thing, all happening simultaneously. And then this one on, this is from 2025, New Orleans, ISIS terrorist. Well, hold on a minute. How do I get mixed up on this? Is this, did I grab the wrong one? Okay, so this might be my mistake entirely. I thought this was connected to this one.

Starting point is 02:26:18 I think it might have just been that I grabbed from James thinking it was the right one. Hold on. What is he saying? Hmm. See, this is just my fault in general. But nonetheless, this is the point here that we're getting at. I'm going to come back to this. We'll go through it in a second.

Starting point is 02:26:36 Now, the point I was trying to get at, and this is what happens when I'm trying to add these things on in the last seconds we're going. So I saw these before I was going live and I haven't even got a chance to read through this one. And we're going to go through that in a second and we'll see what we find in that. But this is why it's better to make sure we can, you know, flesh these out. But it was an additional point just to be clear. But now we'll come back to it one second. This is what it's connected to, not the one we're talking about. My apologies.

Starting point is 02:26:59 So this is the one we're going to come back to you on this with the Daily Wire Reporter, which I find hilarious. This one, too. That was the Omar. So really quickly back to this. This was the end tale. I put it in the wrong spot. Just you guys know why that happened.

Starting point is 02:27:12 The facts are not even fully flushed out yet, but the propaganda film is already underway. That's how stupid this is. This is already being made. on the second the day this is two days later hot eight to uh to air fly Dubai hijack documentary i find it almost impossible that that would be right you know patch together that quickly but we'll see now to some other discrepancies on this save your hero plumber conversation before we get into the overlaps i want to talk about so i wanted to go right away so i don't confuse anybody but i think it's better to go to the

Starting point is 02:27:49 end so i don't make it any more confusing So this is Adam. So we're supposed to believe that this is a magical cup of water that doesn't spill when planes are in nose dive. Remember, this is afterward him kneeling. And that's why I showed you this. And this magical cup of waters and spill and the guy's magical color shoes changed. The oxygen mash didn't drop. Like all these things.

Starting point is 02:28:10 Now, is it possible that he changed his shoes? Is it possible that this is, you know, some other discrepancy? Of course. But what's interesting is that the continual narratives don't line up. They just, it's consistent when you walk through the information. And then you have people that continue to point out fake things like this. Now, this is clearly, in my opinion, AI, but it is being pointed to by some online as the example when they save this person. It's not.

Starting point is 02:28:36 It's AI, as they call Hosbar a slop. Here is something going around from the other side of the conversation where you have somebody saying, look, we caught a discrepancy. Here is a ceiling that is one way and here's a ceiling that is another way. Now, it's easy to jump at these things. This is a person saying, well, this is actually from a different video. So I wanted to make sure we check that, and it does appear to be the case. August 2025, apparently it was an Israeli team celebrating on the way back with their speaker, right? But it's important to question these things.

Starting point is 02:29:08 We all can make mistakes, guys. And so what's important, though, is to recognize that these things are being done, I think, to deliberately kind of trip up the conversation. You never know. Here is a beer who I think does great work, who saw this going around. Probably this person shares it without even realizing it's wrong, saying volume up.

Starting point is 02:29:28 And she says, they want us to believe the plane dropped all this far, but they were playing loudspeakers. And so my point is, I think this person does excellent work, and I think it's an honest purveyor of information. But because of the way the propaganda works in these platforms, it's easy to get swept up by it. Nonetheless, though, that does appear to be, oops, short again, 2025.

Starting point is 02:29:48 But that doesn't mean, right, that there's not other examples of discrepancies. But that is, I tend to think thrown in in order to get this to be hard for the average person to want to see. Now, this is Daniel Mayle saying boarding a flight tonight on the 30th. The pilot makes eye contact with me as an openly religious Jew because he sure knows that, right? And it says, you got me covered tonight? And he goes, a new responsibility for Jews worldwide. I said, well, another example of something else that absolutely. never happened. The idea that you think a pilot's going to be like, you got me,

Starting point is 02:30:23 you're going to physically defend me, should something go awry. That's not only wildly outside of protocol and like legalities for the pilot. It's just not true, guys, but this is what you get from this kind of narrative. Now, you also have people who are altering imagery to make it look like things didn't go the way they did. So ultimately the way this quickly goes down is people going, hey, I think it's wildly unlikely that this glass of water would still be sitting there, whether spill or not or in the cup holder, had the plane done what you claimed it did. So then you get people that go on and say,

Starting point is 02:30:54 it looks like it's sealed. And then I go, I could see it's sealed. Well, it's clearly not. Seeing us how that's very clearly AI, according to most AI checker, anyone that I've tried, a 98% AI.

Starting point is 02:31:05 And even literally showing you the spot right, that's right where it shows you that it was altered. So that's not true. So is it possible? There's another explanation that the glass didn't spill for some of it was put there afterward. I mean, you guys,

Starting point is 02:31:17 you could fill in the blank. It's not hard to find something that makes sense. But with all of it said and done, it's clear that there's pieces being lied about. This person says, guess why Trump, through the keywords for search engines here? Okay.

Starting point is 02:31:34 What he's saying is, this is very Q-in-on-type stuff. Here, Trump throws, he slammed his incoherent after throwing a glass of water amid speech. Who knows why? I didn't even care to look into it. This says, guess why Trump threw those? well, he wants you to notice the glass of water, right?

Starting point is 02:31:51 That's what he's trying to suggest because that he knew and he was trying to show you the day before that it was going to be a false flag. You know what? Maybe. Very, very unlikely, but who knows? But I think this is a kind of thing you get, right? First of all, this guy, this person says, guy who Googles glass of water hoping to find results about possibly staged airline hijacking.

Starting point is 02:32:13 It's just kind of humorous way to frame that. but also the idea, oh, it was, oh, I guess the point that I was going to add to that was simply that we're, oh, yeah, I think it was comments down here. What was it? There's one of the thing. Anyway, you know, oh, that was somebody saying pretty sure that's a cup of water, not a glass of water, you know, things like that. But either way, the idea that somehow you want Trump to not be the one, by the way, explain then why he would lie to you about what happened. If you think that, you know, I simply just said some people are just desperate to paint their guy as the good guy, that they will grasp at anything.

Starting point is 02:32:50 But glad we're all aware this was a massive propaganda event. That's good. Oh, and then this is interesting to me. James Lee says, now we know why John Kirokow has been shoved down our throats for the last several years. It's been a lot longer than that, by the way. You know, these people are somewhat new to this field, by the way. But so John Kierka has been on for a long time.

Starting point is 02:33:08 And it's been talking about, you know, what I think are pretty solid points for quite a while. Doesn't mean we shouldn't question whether that's all been by design, right? but it says in the latest video he eats up the Israeli account of the fly to buy incident hook wine and sinker colonel tower walked and says i told you he's a ridiculous at this point the glow require sunglasses i mean yeah i'd question that we should i don't think there is former cia nonetheless this is hard for me to wrap my mind around this guy is always very skeptical and this is how you take this event sign for yourself in the middle east it's a discount airline called fly dubai well early this morning, the co-pilot on a flight from Dubai to Tel Aviv pulled out a knife, stabbed the pilot,

Starting point is 02:33:54 severely wounding him, almost killing him so that the co-pilot could then commandeer the plane and crash it into the desert, killing all 180 people. What ended up happening was the pilot fought back. And when it became apparent to, the 180 passengers that something terrible was happening because they they dropped from 34,000 feet to 17,000 feet in two minutes. Passengers broke down the door of the of the cockpit. They were able to detain the co-pilot and allow the severely wounded pilot to finally land the plane at the Prince Sultan bin abdel aziz airport in tabooq, Saudi Arabia. First of all, this is an act of terrorism. The co-pilot apparently was actively trying to kill everybody on board. More importantly is what they're not reporting in the papers. And that is that

Starting point is 02:34:58 according to Robert McLean, who is a famed TSA whistleblower and a dear friend of mine, the passengers were able to break down the door because there was no security door separating the passengers from the pilot. What I mean is this. In the immediate, The immediate aftermath of the 9-11 attacks, Congress passed a law. The law has been adopted by pretty much every country in the world that all cockpit doors have to be steel-reinforced to prevent another 9-11. Well, guess what? After 25 years, fewer than 5% of passenger airliners have steel-reinforced cockpit doors. It's the dirty little secretive civilian air.

Starting point is 02:35:43 aviation. We're no better protected today than we were on 9-11. And oddly, in kind of a reverse situation, the only way that this plane didn't crash head first, nose first into the desert is because the passengers could breach the door. Oh, oh. Anyway. So he's literally towing that line with no details, even though we can now literally prove that everyone's reporting the opposite, other than Trump and Netanyahu, of course. That seems wildly suspect. At least what he's demonstrated before is skepticism, discernment,

Starting point is 02:36:21 right? Intelligence. Not blind acceptance of a group. He's called liars. Doesn't that seem strange? Terrorism is going to happen. Acts of terrorism are going to take place, unfortunately. But in the greater scheme of things,

Starting point is 02:36:38 the airlines have to get with the program. And they've got to protect the pilots from crazed passengers or those who mean fellow passengers harm. Very strange story. I'm going to continue to watch it. We'll keep you updated. Yeah, I guess we'll find out.

Starting point is 02:36:58 Very odd. Now, before we come back to that other point, which I want to get back to, I see now what happened and we'll come back to that a second. It's actually kind of important to show you the history. It looks like either he made a mistake himself or ultimately it was joking. And again, it was a mistake.

Starting point is 02:37:13 like the, you know, getting it after the fact, like up late in the show before we get started. But this is important before we get to that. And then from there, we'll only have a couple more points to wrap up on. This I find especially interesting. So what we're talking about this entire story, right, is that is a UAE fly to buy flight, Indian pilot, allegedly a Moni co-pilot, this seemed weirdly still not fleshed out. And then the incident happens. They land emergency, right?

Starting point is 02:37:42 So now you have Israelis who are not, where they landed. And so again, we're talking about a group that is, I mean, at least ostensibly like normalization deals with Israel. Part of this like larger group that's allegedly using their bases

Starting point is 02:37:55 to let them bomb Iran. But what's weird is if you really look into it, the government as well as the people like don't really support Israel. It's more of a political, strong arm tactic, or at least a puppet situation where the leaders. But nonetheless,

Starting point is 02:38:10 the point is after all this, Israeli airline cancels Dubai evacuation flights after UAE withdraws landing permits. So what happened is immediately Israel, because of the way this went down, makes it puts them on like a restricted list in regard to flying from UAE, which it's just funny, like they wouldn't see a reciprocal thing. But so then UAE revokes their landing permits, which to me suggests we don't want you landing here, which is the reverse of the way that looks.

Starting point is 02:38:40 To me, I think it almost signifies that the UAE knows Israel's using this or driving the situation and now worries about their flights landing from Israel in UAE. Just what you could look at that way, or you could look at it like a reciprocal response to them doing it to them and they just felt irritated by it. I think the first one sounds more likely. Israeli flag carrier, El Al announced this the flight, the airliner, Friday that it had canceled flights scheduled to bring Israelis home from. Dubai after the UAE withdrew landing permits for Israeli carriers knowing Israelis were there you understand and it says quote due to the cancellation of approval for Israeli companies just Israeli companies to land in Dubai as was reported by the authorities in Israel we were forced to cancel at this stage our rescue flights rescue flights how you frame it they're literally in Dubai

Starting point is 02:39:34 you will let you they're not you know anyway for tomorrow and it says Al al did not explain why the landing permits have been withdrawn, and there was no immediate official clarification from Emirati authorities. That's interesting to me. I feel like it makes more sense to think about, like if we're all so aware this is a false flag, you know they see that too. You know they see what we're all saying.

Starting point is 02:39:57 And so to me, it might be we don't want to be involved in how this is used. Or you can decide. I thought that was pretty interesting. Now, additionally, the cradle adds to that. The cancellations fall, which I said already, but just you can see the cancellations follow the suspension of flight to buy services to Israel after what happened. So Israel saying, like, we don't trust you and your flights is kind of, you know, that you could see a response to that. But I read more into it.

Starting point is 02:40:23 Now, on top of that, as just Blade of Sons points out, here is a terrorist attack that actually happened and isn't a false flag. But of course, nobody will be talking about it. Today, this was the 30th, Israeli terrorist settlers have set fire to hundreds of olive trees in D'er Sharif, West of Nablus, and the West Bank. I mean, imagine if it was Palestinians who set fire to hundreds of orchards or, you know,

Starting point is 02:40:49 in Israel, do you think they would use the word terrorist attack? You damn will know they would. But of course, when it's settlers who the whole world are now very clearly beginning to acknowledge as the most radical element in this are burning people's orchards, you know, no reason, no lot, no legal reality,

Starting point is 02:41:06 just nobody cares. Yeah, just recognize the discrepancy. Now, before this one actually, and this one, so here's what ultimate looks like it happened. And so to be clear for those that may be just tuning in, this was something, this one and this one and this one, were things that I grabbed right at the end of the show, not to give myself a pass, but I made a mistake.

Starting point is 02:41:30 And that's important to note that people make mistakes, and it's about an owning to them. The point being is that this was grabbed at the very end before, as I was getting prepped, I saw it as I was posting this stuff, and was like, oh, let's include that and then grabbed it. And that's why those things will happen on my side. Not that it should be accepted,

Starting point is 02:41:45 but it's very rare that I will make a mistake like that if it's something I'm betting for beforehand. Nonetheless, it is related. And here's the point. This was the post we were getting at earlier, right? The Omani co-pilot attempted to crash the flight. This is coming from the diplomatic correspondent. He's saying here that the source relays the belongings of free Palestine,

Starting point is 02:42:05 you know, in his belongings, which I've seen zero evidence of, by the way. And so what he's pointing to is saying, and this is what the guy's house looked like. Now, there's no indication that that's him joking down here. This guy says, what's with the old video? Because everyone here thinks this is, you know, just in the reactionary sense, he says it's satire.

Starting point is 02:42:30 Okay. I don't really see how it's satire. I mean, unless, anyway, I feel like that's going to mislead a lot of people. Now, had I looked at this while I was prepping, of course, I would have looked at this, as I hope you would know, but don't assume, question me because we can all make mistakes. Now, this is interesting, though, because of what we were generally talking about,

Starting point is 02:42:48 which is that what you tend to get is this kind of ridiculous, let's walk through as the Daily Wire and be like, oh, look, his ID, oh, a Quran. Like a Quran or a prayer rug or somehow an evil thing. It just express, their bigotry is on display in everything they do when it comes to Muslims. And then, oh, look, here's an outline list of, you know, It's just really stupid.

Starting point is 02:43:11 And this is what it was about 2025, the New Orleans conversation. Here she is, Daily Wire, immigration reporter. And then here was the Omar Mateen exact same thing. Oh, look, an ID card and we'll wander. It just happens to be on the table. And it's like, remember, what they framed this one as was like not, no, it wasn't, people hadn't gone through. It's like, that's important.

Starting point is 02:43:33 You tell me it's an ongoing investigation. Come on. That doesn't make any sense. Now, this one is October 2nd. And this is a separate event as well, two Iranians charged in UK over alleged terrorism plots targeting Jewish community. Now, a lot of Iranian officials and others, like, for example, the semi-official at Saeed Mohamed Murandi online, is simply going, look, they're all conducting terrorist attacks.

Starting point is 02:43:57 Now, yes, you could argue saying that whether it's true or not would benefit whatever you think the agenda is for Iran, but I happen to agree. And he's pointing at Saudi Arabia, it's pointing, and it's kind of popping off all over the place. Now, this is certainly possible, but why would this in any way be what Iran would do? I mean, we can all see what Iran's done so far. Whether you think they're good guys or bad guys are right or wrong, the point is you can't ignore how strategically sound and measured and thoughtful they've been in this entire thing in the sense of like what's best for their outcome.

Starting point is 02:44:32 You're going to tell me that they would argue that a secret plot to attack Jewish communities would in any way benefit them even if they did it secretly? I mean, it's just stupid. But then to get caught for them, come on, guys. Now, that being said, while it being a possibility, however, fringe, that's important to point out. I don't believe this for a second. Now, I haven't read through this even.

Starting point is 02:44:51 I'm just saying on a general sentiment point like this makes no sense, but maybe we read through it and we find out more. Two Iranian nationals were charged in Britain with preparing their terrorist attack against Jewish communities in Northern England, weirdly timed with all these other weird things they're claiming are the same thing, that all stopped to fall apart. Now it says, and amid heightened tension over separate suspect, yeah, this is the one they're talking

Starting point is 02:45:12 about, the one in the UK linked military base, which is obviously not what they're claiming. 35-year-old and a 36-year-old have been charged with preparing to commit or assist another, with preparing to commit or assisting another to commit an act of terrorism. My God, they've gotten, like, so what if you're assisting the guy who's assisting the guy who's going, okay, this gets ridiculous. I mean, in the, I mean, like in a general sense of what the UK is doing right now, we have people who are saying, you know, genocide, you're going to prison, even though it's obviously a genocide.

Starting point is 02:45:50 And it says, Britain has seen the slight, oh, this just said Manchester on the eve of the holiest Jewish day in the calendar. Britain has seen a significant rise in anti-Semitism. Well, guys, you can show examples right this moment that literally, literally from the ADL that show the examples of anti-Semitism that say, love Jews. hate Zionism. And that's the kind of stuff they're pointing to. But yes, tell us that it's about hate Jews, love Jews, the first thing it says. But they wink, wink, it's a lie so they can hide the other one. You know, you guys fill in whatever blank you want. Nobody's believing you. This rise in

Starting point is 02:46:22 anti-Semitism has been roundly shown to be anything Palestinian. Are there people that hate Jews irrationally? Obviously. Are the people that hate Muslims irrationally? Obviously. Are the people that hate Christians? Yes, guys, they all exist. The idea that it's overwhelmingly right, it's just not true. if you care to pay attention. It is no secret this country faces a range of serious threats from the Iranian regime. Oh, is it no secret? Walk me through one of them. Oh, they target Jewish communities and try to silence our critics overseas.

Starting point is 02:46:54 They often through proxies. Oh, so nothing then. Nothing. Narrative lies and then false equivalencies. Got it. Iran has always denied such accusations. Okay. Counterterrorism, police say that they allegedly tried to acquire components and equipment

Starting point is 02:47:09 to make an improvised explosive device. Well, what do they just do with gas in the back of a car? They called it a viable explosive before we realized it wasn't even close to that. And again, I've read this yet, guys. I'm walking through this with you. So the interesting part of this is an equipment to make an improvised explosive. Do you realize what that might be? Literally things you buy at a store.

Starting point is 02:47:30 That's how you make an improvised explosive. And it says police also said the two men had allegedly been in contact with an overseas third party who might be in Iran. who might be in Iran? I mean, I shouldn't come at this so skeptical, but I'm, because just to be who knows, but I mean, are we already starting to see how silly these things become?

Starting point is 02:47:49 The pair, who, Mom said, arrived in Britain on a small boat from Europe several years ago, will appear in London's court. One of the men had been granted asylum and the other had been court for what? The charges were announced after a year of a fatal attack,

Starting point is 02:48:07 on a Manchester synagogue where Britain's citizen of Syrian descent. Earlier this week, Britain said Tehran had been involved in alleged plot. So we're just making things up. Detective said there was no connection between Friday's charges and the suspected plot involving the base, which is also not what they claim it is. Okay, so just be clear, apparently nothing to give us any insight of what actually happened. Iranian bad guys, we got them. Now, other stories that we connect to it that aren't actually real.

Starting point is 02:48:34 This is Reuters. We'll follow up. I'm really well. I mean, this is interesting. Here's the actual metropolitan police. Two men, this is where we're getting more detail, I hope, charged with suspected terror plot. Two men have been charged with terrorism offenses following a investigation.

Starting point is 02:48:52 Okay. Arrested. Following authorization from the crown, they were both charged with engaging in conduct in preparation for an attack. Okay. It's alleged that two men were in contact with an overseat third party okay wait a minute here is the the breadth of this story that you you think they were in contact with a third party that's connected to Iran and then bought things that you could use to make

Starting point is 02:49:20 and a play that's it I swear to God it that's it this is absolutely crazy this is beyond what I expected they've been remanded into custody what are you arresting them on like okay even like okay let's even pretend like you bought all the things that you could use to make a bomb and then we're in contact with a third party that was somehow connected to Iran. Where is the crime? You see, this is where we are today in our authoritarian technocratic hellscape. They're telling you we knew what you were going to do, wink, wink, because you're a criminal because of Iran,

Starting point is 02:49:51 and those things could be so terrorism charge. Because if it was just outside of national security, there is no crime right there. My God. Yeah, I mean, that's it. This is all... Here we go to the charges. communicating with others using encrypted applications.

Starting point is 02:50:09 Oh my God, that's real. That's where we are, is what I mean. Like, you can't secretly talk to people anymore to acquire components. So apparently they didn't even acquire them. They were speaking about doing so in this first charge anyway. Acquiring a document entitled steps for making a powder, chlorine, and car brake oil, fluid bomb. Okay. But if that's actually real, as opposed to some fake text back and forth that the U.S. fakes about whatever you're trying to charge,

Starting point is 02:50:35 somebody with or thousands of other examples. If it is real, that's not a crime. You can look up stuff like that all over online. Now, if that is real, you're getting closer to a potential for someone to do something. But this is my point about criminal versus accusation. Is it a crime to look up how to do a crime? No. Think about that.

Starting point is 02:50:54 That matters, especially if you actually care about how your government abuses these things. Acquiring video material containing instructions on how to manufacture this. Again, not a crime. They're all on YouTube. You can look it up right now. acquiring liquids, components, and equipment. Now, what those things were would certainly make a difference, wouldn't they?

Starting point is 02:51:11 If they're like bomb-making components, well, maybe that might make you feel more about it. But if it was benign things that then otherwise become something different when they frame it a certain way, like gas in the back of a car, like we just saw, that would matter. Using the internet to identify and research potential targets, you see, now, is that what it was? This all matters when it flushes out. Or are they patching together benign things? things that together make it look a certain way. You know, maybe they were looking into where events were going to be so they could protest,

Starting point is 02:51:42 and that's how they make that look that way. Acquiring images and plans of maps. Same thing. Conducting reconnaissance. I guess we'll find out. Now, look, like I said, for all we know, that turns out to be exactly what they say, and we should question that it's tied back to Iran unless there's evidence of that. But from what this is being presented as, I'm very skeptical, and it already feels flimsy as hell.

Starting point is 02:52:03 So I guess we will find out. Lastly, here's what Iran said, or excuse me, what Trump said and is very, I read it in the previous article, but you want, I want you to hear it. It's just him driving this towards Iran, probably just for his own purposes. Back to Florida. Yeah. Yeah. A lot of audio. So point was, as he's saying, we're going to end up very hard.

Starting point is 02:52:38 They know, like, he's acting like it's absolutely sure. that we know it's Iran and that we're going to hit them very hard. So watch as they use this to rationalize the ongoing illegal war they're conducting. Like they even need a rationalization. You know, they do, but in their minds, clearly they don't care. Trump, this is how embarrassing this is. This is today. Trump fouls Iran war to end very quickly.

Starting point is 02:53:03 Okay. You mean, aside from the other 40,000 times you've said that since February? You know, it's okay, now is it quickly or was it quickly from when you first? said that and that would mean what another six years i mean what are we talking about as by the way more troops moved to the middle east so you want you to believe now we're just going to do the final big push that i've been waiting to do no no you've tried and you failed repeatedly there's no some it's not like you've been holding back from the biggest attack guys nobody believes that because the evidence shows that's not true from people in the no people involved in the government it's not they've there to i mean

Starting point is 02:53:37 were at the very least depleted there's been a window here where they could have made moves from other countries and so on. But what was that? Did I close that one? Oh, same one. Okay, continuing. The Harmo's letter says, more than 2,000 U.S. Marines are now heading to the Middle East,

Starting point is 02:53:52 aboard the Mackin Island Amphibious Ready Group, with a U.S. official saying three aircraft carriers and two amphibious landing groups will be deployed around Iran by November. You know, because of the war, that's not a war, that we never wanted, that we said wouldn't happen, that was going to be over in three days, but now it's going to be as long as it takes. And continuing.

Starting point is 02:54:12 but also over very soon, based on what he just said, but now we're deploying new troops. As Mr. Sausage says, just what we all voted for, right? The U.S. is now directly posturing for a potential ground invasion of Iran. This is today reports, anyway, sending a third aircraft carrier strike group to up to 10,000 additional sailors, Marines, those are American troops that are going to be sent, potentially to die again for an Israeli war.

Starting point is 02:54:39 Are there even Israelis being sent? I mean, is anybody confused about what's driving this? This should make you very unhappy, whether you believe in Trump or not. It's not even remotely unclear that Israel is driving the U.S., as they bragged about in their media, by the way, to conduct this war for them. He's literally made two different times bragged about how he got Trump to do this. It's embarrassing. So, Trump says this. This is, I believe, yesterday.

Starting point is 02:55:16 Here's what he says. These unbelievable machines led by the most incredible pilots in the world. These unbelievable machines led by the most incredible pilots in the world, they unloaded every single bomb went right down airshoots into this. Airshoots? Drug factories, really. That's what they were doing. They were nuclear and drug.

Starting point is 02:55:40 They were doing drugs, but they were doing the nuclear. but these drug factories slash nuclear factories were hit so hard. Oh, yeah, that really seems like that makes sense. You know, and just on a side note, though, I don't know, guys, I know this may sound crazy. Now, hold to stay with me here, but I think Trump is lying. It's wild. I mean, it's just the stupidest thing in the world.

Starting point is 02:56:05 Drug slash nuclear factories. Like, I don't even know what goes through his head about why he tries to, like, just insert false things. It's just embarrassing. Then here's Donald Trump posting this. Breaking, thousands of Iranians are on the streets, preparing to take back their country from their radical Islamists. That's that John Fitzgerald Kennedy Jr.

Starting point is 02:56:25 The account, why is the legacy meeting now reporting this? And Trump goes, oh, look, this is a true social. Post these images of Iranians out in the streets, clearly coats in the middle of the winter. And that's the point. As Brett says, just to be clear, Trump, it isn't exactly winter jacket weather in Iran right now. This video, as you can check for yourself,

Starting point is 02:56:42 from December 2025. It doesn't matter, though, because it's all about narrative flow, and they want you to think what they want you to think. Al Jazeera English, U.S. ambassador to the United Nations, Mike Walls, you know, the one that caught using an Israeli intelligence app in the White House and they kicked him out to be an ambassador, has accused Iran of violating its nuclear obligations. Not a joke.

Starting point is 02:57:02 And refusing to abandon its nuclear program. I mean, is this not the dumbest administration? I mean, come on. This is about, I mean, think about what I keep saying. Like, you're choosing. to push these ideas. I think my sixth grade neighbor could go, that's not going to make sense right now.

Starting point is 02:57:19 Well, what? But yet they do it. I don't understand that, even with the incompetence I can see. Okay, so first of all, obviously, Trump obliterated that, okay? So how would you argue they're refusing to abandon something that doesn't exist? Even Trump has been playing that game saying, well, they could build back to it.

Starting point is 02:57:36 So if they're not there now by everybody's account from Trump's perspective, then how are they violating their program? But of course, the big thing, the point would be even if you want to pretend by trying to rebuild it, it's obvious that they have a legal right to build a program that's within every other legal avenue that everyone else does. Even nuclear weapons, by the way, there's nothing illegal about that, even if the U.S. claims that. But what's even crazier, I keep making this point. They have consistently, up until the last time it came up, said we don't have any nukes, we don't want any, we don't have a nuclear program. So when they continue to pretend that Iran refuses to abandon that,

Starting point is 02:58:14 what they're saying is they're not saying, we don't believe them. They're pretending Iran is going, we will never do that because they want you to see them as that. Instead of the group that goes, we don't have them. We're telling you right now, after you ask, we commit to not having them. You see my point?

Starting point is 02:58:31 They're not going, we don't believe you. They're coming to you and going, Iran said they'll never give them up. How does that make sense to you? or for example, Rubio, Hegsseth, Trump, all pretend Iran is fighting for some prophetic Armageddon. But they're not, though. And you can easily look for yourself. They have religious, clear religious, political overlaps.

Starting point is 02:58:54 But they're not claiming they're fighting for Armageddon, but Israel is. So explain to me why Heg Seth, Rubio Trump would lie about Iran doing what Israel's doing unless they were hiding what Israel is doing through them. Mike Wallace, McWallis says the U.S. and Israel have lost all credibility. They are not capable of telling the truth. See, and look, this is still happening, by the way. They're enriching uranium 60%, which is credible. They're still pretending. I mean, do I even need to bring it up again?

Starting point is 02:59:28 I don't remember exactly what it was, what it said. Maybe this is the one. Yep, there it is right there. I mean, they're still, still using this claim. And that's why they built this. That's why they had Whitcough lie about it, which was that the 60% of 465 kilograms, enriched to 60%, as he wants you to think,

Starting point is 02:59:52 is a credible civilian, no credible civilian purpose. That's not true, though. Because as you can clearly look, as you can clearly read for yourself, based on inspections conducted at the relevant facilities, since then, Iranians, uranium stockpiles remain under safeguards in accordance with this comprehensive agreement. you may recall that that is 400 kilograms of stockpile up to 60%. Right? Okay. Well, that seems pretty damn clear. And what you remember, that is the

Starting point is 03:00:21 that's the International Atomic Energy Agency Director saying that. Now, what they express in here is that post the war that the U.S. and Israel illegally created, they have yet to be able to go back and confirm beyond what they confirmed just before this started. But based on Trump's points of annihilation, of obliteration, and the reality that there's how in the world they would be able to increase, the time frame between those two points is not possible to be able to explode out with something. So the end point is all they're saying is,

Starting point is 03:00:50 we need to get back to confirming that. And they turn that into, they're telling you Iran's breaking out. The truth is they made it clear that the amount was already within the safeguard. And yet here he is, yet again, either being ignorant, being too stupid to know he's wrong,

Starting point is 03:01:04 or willfully misrepresenting what we all know is the truth, which is that they were already within the safeguard, they were already meeting their agreements, whether the JCPOA or anything sense, according to everybody in the note, even Tulsi Gabbard under Trump's administration, and yet they stick out the Israeli Zionist

Starting point is 03:01:19 propagandist to tell you the lie. And that's what they do. I mean, I mean, Israeli propagandist, meaning a U.S. entity doing propaganda for Israel in that context anyway. Now on top of that, Brett Erickson also points out that on October 1st, you have images of Yemen being bombed by Saudi Arabia,

Starting point is 03:01:39 which isn't necessary. by the way, as you should know. But what I find interesting is that then you have today Yemen bombing Saudi Arabia. And this is important because what we're continuing to see, first of all, there's far more to be damaged in the context of the way they can attack Saudi Arabia than the reverse. Yemen and the Ansarala movement are very much in a similar position like Iran. I wouldn't say the same, but they've, I think, been planning for this and they're not in a position.

Starting point is 03:02:04 It's not like they have all their things stated. They're in a position where they've been bombed and attacked and starved for a long time. they've adapted. So in reverse, they're bombing very important things in Saudi Arabia and Trump is ignoring it, which is only going to hurt them more. So I just think that's important to see. And they have a legal right to be doing this. You know why? Because Saudi Arabia is currently illegally occupying Yemen. And I'll include this to end. Now, hopefully that helped update some people on some of this stuff, guys, but, you know, a couple things to end with on this is really just to recognize that they've lied as, you know, as government, just to make that very simple, but

Starting point is 03:02:48 Israeli government, U.S. government, U.S. government, U.K. government. I mean, it's not a secret, guys. Anybody anywhere can prove that even the previous and current administrations, they've been caught lying relentlessly. So it's not, it shouldn't be that difficult for us to go, maybe they would lie about this for their own interest. I mean, that's like one plus one equals two to me. And we shouldn't assume that either. The evidence, though, shows. you guys that these people are very like whether it's because they're failing or maybe they just want to distract away from this larger agenda we should ask both but it's important to really see what's happening and see how it's being used and how people in the new media and the mainstream

Starting point is 03:03:22 are just the same cycling you know they're dishonest people or unwilling to acknowledge or engage with the information that shows that they're being misled but also because i recognize as we highlighted there at the end that it's easy to make mistakes guys people People make mistakes all the time. The important part about this is being skeptical, discernment, questioning, right, coming back and owning those things. As we go through this, we will be played. We will all get fooled.

Starting point is 03:03:52 I mean, like, most likely from somebody that we think we should, you know, that we, like, like you thinking you can trust me and then me doing something that is in either dishonest, which I'm not suggesting I'll do, but you don't know that, or that I might just be wrong. That's why you should question it because if you do, ultimately, you'll, up seeing that. Now, I shouldn't, I mean, I'm not suggesting that myself, I won't do that. I don't, I'm not planning on doing that. I'm an honest person, but you shouldn't assume that. The point, though, is that there's plenty of people out there that are wildly dishonest and get caught long all the time. And it's easy for those people to continue to play into things that will,

Starting point is 03:04:28 you know, at the very least muddy the waters. But with me, with other people, the IMA, with other people, new media, mainstream media, it should be implied. the same way. You engage, you consider, you question. Simple. Very simple. And if you do that, you will ultimately, like we did live on the show today, you know, come around to seeing it, flush it out. It's important, guys. It's very important. Because unless we do that, we will continue to fall to the, you know, cascading large narratives that take over these conversations. That's what they want. But I'd like to believe we're getting past that, though. Just end on a positive note.

Starting point is 03:05:08 I feel like what we've been saying since the beginning of the year even before is, I mean, undeniably flushed out, even though that's never really acknowledged. But overall, the point being that I think that people are starting to see this. You know, they're trying to, they're truly starting to wake up to the bigger picture of not like the way I see things, but just that we're being lied to. Like as an entity, like the entirety of our structure is about trying to keep us pacified, placated, in the shadows, drug, up in the corner not paying attention like that's that's and that's not everybody in every position

Starting point is 03:05:40 but as an entire as a whole are we really denying that right now you know that we see how the structure's been built to keep us under the boot even know it's funny though even just saying these things some people they hear this stuff and just go that's so crazy you're a conspiracy theorist it's like have you not looked at history if you are you not aware of previous examples of this happening just i mean near consistently in every government i've ever seen my life, why would you doubt it could happen now? You know, I don't know. But like I said, I believe that because of the work we're doing, because of how much you share this content, because you go out and talk about it, you do your own shows, you speak with your friends and

Starting point is 03:06:17 people are waking up. So remember that. And as much as it gets dark and negative and there's so much hatred and divisive, you know, there is so much positive out there. They just don't want us to see. Don't forget that. Go outside and realize that and remember that there's good people out there in every position, fighting for good things, you just don't see them. I mean, if I didn't believe that, I wouldn't be doing this. So keep fighting for that. I love you all. As always, question everything. Come to your own conclusions. Stay vigilant.

The Last American Vagabond - Flydubai Narrative Falls Apart In Real-Time & Trump FBI Frames Autistic Man As Right-Wing Terrorist

There aren't comments yet for this episode. Click on any sentence in the transcript to leave a comment.