The Last American Vagabond - Haiti Fights To End Western Exploitation, Congo Continues To Be Manipulated & Israel Defeated Itself

Starting point is 00:00:20 Welcome to the Daily Wrapup, a concise show dedicated to bringing you the most relevant, independent news as we see it from the last 24 hours. Thursday, February 8th, 2024, thank you for joining me today. Important topics to cover in other areas of foreign policy in the international community. We're going to discuss some topics that we've discussed more than once over the years. Interestingly enough today that not just are important because of themselves or, or from an American perspective, important because of belligerent, destructive U.S. foreign policy, but because it relates directly to what, I guess, the best way to frame it is the fallout, the changing of the way the international community has operated because of Israel's actions.

Starting point is 00:01:11 And I mean in a detrimental way, as they might perceive it. To the average person, it's fantastic to finally see people, whether doing it for the right reasons or not, finally acknowledging truths that we've all known were verifiable facts in regard to the origins of Israel or U.S. foreign policy itself and what they're actually accomplishing, what they're funding, who they're supporting. A lot has shifted in just the last so many months. In regard to Haiti, I think everyone's aware to some degree or another how much the U.S. has manipulated that country and just the West in general. But I'm speaking as an American from a U.S.-centric perspective, but really,

Starting point is 00:01:50 it really is, I think, predominantly the U.S. government in regard to Haiti, but we could make a lot of other points there. We're also going to talk about Congo, the Democratic Republic of Congo, and how more than just rare earth minerals, cobalt in particular, and other examples of how this country has been exploited as far back as you can look, but why both of these, in their own way, or their own individual circumstances, have had this, have been dealing with outside influence and manipulation, again, as far back as you can look, and they've been fighting this and pushing back and being regime changed and lied about. But today in particular, it seems as if there's a lot going on that is, it's never just one thing, but in a large way, the peoples of these countries

Starting point is 00:02:36 recognizing, or more specifically the movements led by the peoples of these countries that are recognizing an opportunity that can see the, again, I'm going to say the U.S. government, but really it's more than that. But in this sense that they can see the adversary of theirs that has been manipulating this country, taking its resources for its own benefit under the guise of helping them, has recognized the opportunity that this entity is distracted. It's spread too thin. There's a lot going on in the world that has taken its attention, and as well as the fact

Starting point is 00:03:12 that a lot that has caused disorientation has caused to just a rift in what's going on into the point to where there's an opportunity for these kind of entities to recapture what they see is theirs. And now it's obvious to see that that could be framed as terrorism or freedom or revolution for, you know, depending on who's framing it. That's always how this works, where, you know, the Palestinians become terrorist or they become the freedom fighters depending on what angle you're looking at. And this is always how it goes.

Starting point is 00:03:43 So we're going to talk about these countries today and how they've been exploited for a long time and how right now it seems to be that they're finding a way to push back and gaining attention for it and how we're going to see the same kind of, I would even argue, more destructive than usual because of how insecure they are right now, the foreign policy that will follow. We're going to start today with a quick point about Candida Oras and this fungus that keeps coming up in the conversation that now the CDC for like a third time in the last so many months, warning that it's going to happen even though there's not much evidence of it, but it could. It could break out everywhere, and it could just be one of those hype moments that they keep you in fear.

Starting point is 00:04:21 But it's interesting how it overlaps with Palestine. And we've seen as a just, I think, yesterday or today, the Mossad put out a tweet saying another one of our IDF members have succumb to this mysterious fungus they caught while they were in Palestine, simultaneously arguing, excuse me, know, they say something else, the Gaza. But at the same time, pointing out how they're worried about how this could grow and grow beyond the borders of just God. as I see that becoming if they should need it, a very easy tool to use and apply to the global WHO level community to show how this needs to be dealt with, which could lead to certain agendas. But we're going to talk about why I think that's interesting. A quick point about Tucker Carlson seeming is how that's eclipsed everything important in the world, and I'm going to make a point about it today.

Starting point is 00:05:06 And then, of course, covering what we will today, depending on time about Israel, Gaza, and the continuation of that coverage. as I just framed it today in that section. And again, I really, we'll do it justice today based on what we're going to show, but that Israel has defeated itself. I said this, I think a week into this conversation, I think I just framed it as Israel has already lost the information war. And I think that was, I think that's proven itself to be wildly clear.

Starting point is 00:05:34 That's the case. But I think today the point is that, and I've made this point the entire time, but really becoming explicitly clear that they have defeated themselves. and there was a way that they could have done this right out of the gate that would have guaranteed unfettered support, unconditional rather support, as they had grown used to, but more than we'd ever seen had they just simply decided not to go full genocide immediately and leaned into the international community after October 7th. I mean, it would have, you all know how that would have gone. The point is instead they went aggressive full genocide without concern for the fallout. and that has seemingly dismantled their control over your awareness of what's always been happening,

Starting point is 00:06:15 which is a positive, very clearly, regardless of how much negative fallout comes along with that. So let's start today with that point about, oh, technically, I forgot I included this as well, just because I thought this was hilarious and interesting, but you know, you can always find a way these things relate. It was technology review.com. Solar geoengineering could start. Soon, if it starts small, I just like, oh, my God, like, who knows if the person writing that or the editor of the platform is aware that that's the most absurd thing to say of all topics we could discuss. Because you, I mean, as I'll agree what I wrote, I said, sure, sure, that makes sense, you know. Or, or it started decades ago and is blatantly obvious and has been admitted to countless times, you know, either or whatever you feel like you want to decide, you know, totally fake or everywhere, whatever you want to choose. I just think things like this are just a sign of the times about how crazy, how ridiculous,

Starting point is 00:07:14 like to the point to where, I mean, well, let's just look at it as a broad sense, whatever apparatus is pushing that agenda, assuming that's what's happening right there. Do they not know that we all at almost every single level know that there is a thing, aerosol, stratospheric aerosol injection, geoengineering, chem trails, whatever people are calling it. Everybody knows that this is a level. I mean, here's what's funny about this. at some level right now, even on Twitter or wherever else in these conversations or especially, you even bring up the concept of this.

Starting point is 00:07:46 It's like lunacy, laugh out loud, I'm going to fall out of my chair because you're just so childish. That's such a conspiracy theory. But the point is they're clearly going, but this is a real thing. Whether or not you want to pretend that it's happening or not, Brennan in 2018 at the, I think it was, this was the C.F. Council of Foreign Relations. I forget what group it was, was standing up there going, you know, this is what we're doing, right?

Starting point is 00:08:11 This is, I mean, I've brought this up so many times. This is what he was essentially pointing to. I think this was even 2018. Yeah, stratospheric aerosol injection, tactics, and costs in the first 15 years of deployment. Just, I mean, hilariously pointing out when you read it, it does go into prior work on this topic. Nonetheless, the point was obviously it's a real thing.

Starting point is 00:08:36 They've planned it. They've mapped it out. They've got costs aligned to certain tax. So it's just hilarious. The people will then still go, that's a whole fake story as they're mapping out how to do it. But the obvious real point is that it has been going on for decades. And again,

Starting point is 00:08:53 has been openly admitted to, even something that was just brought up in conversation with me today, I think, or yesterday, things like chaff. As I course, it was fact checked and light about, but things that we know are real as even,

Starting point is 00:09:04 I think it was an Air Force person who became a weatherman admitted, yeah, they released this stuff for certain radar reason. The point is nonetheless, it's the same, if you're releasing different types of chemicals or rather specifically metals and the point is that this is real. And for them to come out now and go, maybe this could start soon, you realize the date from that's February 5th, 2024, it tells me that there's a reason they want this in your mind. Again, you know, always just brought they being whoever is behind wanting you to look at this and think a certain thing.

Starting point is 00:09:33 it could be government, it could be special interests, they being the hierarchy enslaving you. And we have a shirt for that, by the way, if you'd like to check out our Big Frog, our store. I will pause there for a second because I always, for some reason, want to say, yeah, Big Frog clothing, it's right there. I'll include the link.

Starting point is 00:09:54 I'm just, sorry, I'm just blank because I'm like, is it Big Frog? I always feel like I say their name wrong. And these guys are absolutely fantastic. I hope you guys support them outside of the work for TLAP. But there's the link. Anyway, the point is that, there's an entity out there that I think wants this in your mind because we can prove that

Starting point is 00:10:09 that's ridiculous, right? And secondarily, that it makes me wonder why it would start to be normalized in the sense of going, okay, well, now it actually is happening. And I just wanted to include that thought, especially since you know where my mind goes on this concept, but I cannot decouple the idea of literally spraying particles of metal, whether it's barium, aluminum, because you realize the argument under this topic is it's for climate change and we're going to reflect the sun. Okay, But whatever your ridiculous concept is, the idea is that you're literally spraying particulates. So it's not that far reaching to wrap your mind around smart dust in that same conversation, especially if you understand that it's been around for decades.

Starting point is 00:10:47 And my question was whether that relates to something that happened during the COVID-19 illusion. Something to consider in that conversation. Now, on that same point, we see things like this happening. Now, we can prove, as I have many times, that the idea of wearing a mask is guaranteed to increase your risk of all sorts of similarly related concepts. Now, this one relates to something that is largely gained while in the hospital. This is what's a bacterial or rather a fungal infection that spreads rapidly through hospitals. It went overwhelmingly out of control during COVID, which continued to point out exactly why most people are afraid of going to, you know,

Starting point is 00:11:24 medical treatment today as a concern, especially seeing us how it's at least as we're told, third leading cause of death in this country, which should scare the hell out of you, probably worse than that. But the point was, that their mask was, I think it was candida albacons was something that you could gain through a fungal infection with yeast and so on in your mouth, wearing a mask. It went all over the place, and they tried to deny it. That's at lookup dentists and overlaps during oral thrush and things like that during COVID. It was horrifying, which then leads to things like bacterial pneumonia, so systemic inflammation,

Starting point is 00:11:54 which are very serious and all get called COVID. Side point, or rather, that's the side point. This point is about the idea that this is being pushed again as of the seventh. is yesterday from the CDC. Silent killer, fungal infections spreading rapidly through the U.S. What's funny about it is it's getting framed as if it's like a new impending threat. But this was spreading all over the place during the COVID-19 illusion, and it was definitely rising and it was a concern.

Starting point is 00:12:22 So it's less than that now, you understand. And yet now they're going, oh my God, and it can kill 60% of people, fatality, whatever they're saying, hyping all these high numbers. I don't really, I'm not concerned about what this is. I think this is something that, like anything else, is something you should be worried about in a normal sense. Be prepared, be safe. Take care of yourself.

Starting point is 00:12:40 But I wonder why this is being floated, especially since you can see that this is something overlapping with the concept, what's going on in Gaza, which is really strange. Again, my point there, in case you missed it, I was saying it quickly is that there was a, this was peaking during the COVID-19 conversation. So for them to hype it now,

Starting point is 00:12:59 it doesn't make much sense unless there, in my opinion, unless there's another reason they want you thinking about this. Gaza was given an experimental Pfizer injection to deal with this exact thing. And this is before the recent point. This was on December 27th. I covered this. And in case you hadn't seen that, this was the post from one of their health correspondence. I believe, let me make sure I got her actual title here.

Starting point is 00:13:27 Yeah, health correspondent pointing out, as we discussed at the time, in light of several cases of soldiers who were injured in Gaza and who then suffered from fungal infection, which it was candida orus, recently doctors in several hospitals requested to import into Israel an experimental drug, which wouldn't be the first time seeing the cellicob shot was the same thing for the treatment of this fungi from the Pfizer company called Phosmanod. that's weird, I forgot this one. Fosmanogipes.

Starting point is 00:14:06 Fosmanogipix. I don't even know why they picked the strangest name for these things. Probably so it's impossible. Nonetheless, the point was they didn't need to really import it. You know why? Because we talked about at the time.

Starting point is 00:14:19 These were the three Israeli hospitals that were calling for it. They all took part in the phase two trials of that drug. So this is what's crazy to me is they literally were taking part in phase two trials of this drug before this became a weird

Starting point is 00:14:30 problem that popped up in Gaza. After this weird discussion during the COVID-19, does that seem a little bit on the nose? They just so happen to be the ones that did the trials and now they're using. Okay, maybe it's all coincidence, but the point is that seemed a little strange to me. So this is December 26th, 2023.

Starting point is 00:14:49 A soldier with fungal infection dies. Fears grow in Gaza diseases spreading into Israel. That was the point about kind of framing Gaza as dangerous and sickly and disease-ridden, even though this is happening because of what. what they're doing. And on top of that, it could be used as a point to kind of marshal the whole WHO angle of this to argue that they have to take certain actions because Gaza will make everybody else sick. Like you can see how that could be applied. Now, Mohamed Shihata pointed out

Starting point is 00:15:16 this same thing, pointing out the hype about this. Per Haaretz, Israeli experts acknowledge the siege and war are in fact creating an incubator for these very things. So you could argue that that's, in a way, biological weapon warfare in a sense of creating and forcing the situations to cause these biological problems. But it says Gaza overcrowded bombing and besieged hospitals are unable to diagnose patients, let alone treat these things. So it says the conditions in the Gaza Strip have created an incubator for these problems, which I think is by design. Then it says this war needs to stop immediately before deadly and untreatable diseases, wipe out a significant portion of the population and spread beyond Gaza's borders. That's just,

Starting point is 00:15:58 It's general concern, but I can see how that could be marshaled against everybody, whether real or not. It says, but senior Israeli public officials, guess what, are calling to weaponize the spread of this, which actually happened. Retired Israeli General says the spread of this will help us bring victory closer. So that's my point about flooding things, making sure you either taint the water more or don't allow any fresh water. You're guaranteeing like they did with Yemen that you will cause the very illnesses you then point at and blame on them. Now, last one, it says, Israeli sources say the most likely origin of this dangerous fungus may be in soil contaminated with sewage water.

Starting point is 00:16:34 But's exactly what they caused. Lastly, today, or rather yesterday, Mossad pointed out, another IDF soldier died from this fungus. That's just very interesting to me. It seems like an odd thing for them to hype and focus on, or you could not, don't use the word hype, just for them to highlight. I find that interesting.

Starting point is 00:16:56 Now, all of that being said, it, just something I thought you should be aware of. I personally feel that there's something strange there. Now, also, let's put it this way. This could be nothing. This could be no, this could not be engineered in any way. It could just be general reporting about something that's happening and it will end up going nowhere. And maybe it was nothing.

Starting point is 00:17:13 But just because it ends up being nothing, it doesn't mean it wasn't something that was, like I find the way that this is being presented is suspicious to me. And for those of you who pay attention to the way these things go, you'll pick these things out. But realize there are things that are in fact being manipulated that just don't end up being executed, manipulated like that. So just consider that. That's not meant to say that, you know, whether or not it happens, regardless. The point is just be concerned, be skeptical about it.

Starting point is 00:17:38 Keep an eye on this, especially as we see masks and these kind of conversations rising back up. It's important to see how this may be dealt with. I mean, the bigger point to just walk away with here is the interesting reality and watch this show about this, that Pfizer is yet again using an experimental injection on the people in Gaza, as well as the fact they ship what, 50,000 COVID-19. vaccines in the middle of a starvation tactic. Like, it's just so crazy how this seems to be allowed while food isn't. In any case, I wanted to include this one point as well in the larger health, freedom,

Starting point is 00:18:09 COVID-19 illusion discussion. This is from the Irish Star. Doctor shares crucial information on the supposed mystery respiratory virus, which I haven't been doing as much focus on the building of the variant. It doesn't seem to be anybody doing that that much right now. But there is a little bit of hype building back again about, hospitals being overrun and masks coming back. I haven't seen it go too crazy just yet. But it is, we all feel it. There's little points about it rising back up.

Starting point is 00:18:36 It's interesting how little some people seem to care about it, which tells you that I don't think they are having the influence they did before this. Thank you for everybody that's been pushing back. But this is, I think this is important. It's the doctor who decided to speak up. To that very point, I think that's why, because he recognizes that there's more people out there interested to hear the truth. A doctor has shared some crucial information with the regard to the supposed mystery respiratory virus that has been seemingly going around the country. I've seen a few of those reports, too. Our hospitals are overrun.

Starting point is 00:19:05 Claims were being made that the emergency rooms were overcrowded with people suffering from respiratory issues while Dr. Eric, was his name, confirmed these claims. He claims to debunk this mystery virus. He says there is no mystery respiratory virus going around making people sick. We are just in the middle of a bad respiratory season. I thought about that for a second. I said, well, that's interesting, right? Because he's basically saying, and you don't even have to put the word bad in there.

Starting point is 00:19:33 We're just in the thing that happens every single winter, right? And so this is what's interesting about this roll around, because right before the COVID illusion, and even for those that would argue there's not such thing as a virus, that flu doesn't exist and whatever else. You could look at it on whatever you think it is, whatever reason you think people seem to get it, maybe you think somebody's doing that to be, whatever it is. The point is we have this kind of ebb and flow every time to some degree. Right, before the COVID illusion, we had one of the worst seasons in a long time. And what's interesting about this is that it's less now than it was then.

Starting point is 00:20:05 And yet right now, just because it's people have the sniffles and oh my God, COVID's back, right? That's the kind of mentality in some people's minds. And he goes on to say, I work in a hospital and admit patients from the emergency room. And yeah, there are crowded, the rooms are crowded right now. But it's not because of a mystery virus. It doesn't seem to suggest that it's wildly over the norm. but he says just because you're sick and it's important, and you get tested for COVID and the flu,

Starting point is 00:20:30 which who in the world gets tested for the flu? I don't even know why he said that. I don't even think there's any, like go to the net, go to CB, Walgreens or wherever you would go and ask them for a test for flu. They'll look at you like you're crazy.

Starting point is 00:20:42 They don't have these things just, trust me, it's not something most people do. And before COVID-19 illusion, people didn't get tested for the flu. They just were like, oh, I've got the flu. Because you just had the sniffle. Doesn't that tell you something? because we conflate these things and you have a certain set of symptoms,

Starting point is 00:20:56 we just go, oh, yeah, that's that, that's that. Well, that's what happened during the COVID illusion. You had these set of symptoms, though he just deemed it COVID. They just had a little more hype around the narrative and we're more worried about it. Turns out it was never even worse than what we told the flu was, per the ionitis group and the peer-reviewed science that found that out. Point zero, I can't remember off the top of my head. Let me see if I can grab it.

Starting point is 00:21:18 I forget which one it was. I think it was this one? Yeah, perfect. Age stratified infection fatality. rate, peer review, January, 2023, hasn't been challenged. No, this is the leading edge of this science. At a global level, before vaccinations were ever given, not the absolute, the infection fatality rate may have been as low as 0.03 and 0.07.

Starting point is 00:21:45 That's 0.03 if you're under 59, 0.07 under 69. That's less than 1%. That is less than the flu. And then 94% of the global population is in that category. 94% of the entire world was at less than a flu risk. If that's even what actually happened, and we just still go for pretending like that's not the case. It all came from the Imperial College of London, their 3.6 complete guess percent,

Starting point is 00:22:14 which was proven to have been used based on their assumptions. But by the way, which is kind of how it's always been, these so-called experts that give you their opinion, is fact all the time and we go with that because they're in the elitist scientific scientism group. Anyway, the point is obviously just because people have the sniffles and go to the hospital and are getting tested for things and it's not COVID doesn't mean we've got a new mystery thing. It just means you've got a respiratory virus. He says there are dozens and dozens and dozens and dozens of them out there.

Starting point is 00:22:42 We've just been hyped. We've been hyped into this moment where people have, you know, become all, they've all become hypercontracts. People at least in that category, they're terrified. and that's how this works. Before this, people would get the sniffles and they'd go, okay, I probably the flu. Even if you got really sick, remember,

Starting point is 00:22:58 you still just went like, well, I'll go get some medicine from Walgreens. Isn't that strange? And all of a sudden, after this, it's like, oh, my God, it feels different this time. My fingers feel different. Oh, my God, everyone just kind of lost it. And the science, the science continues to show that we were wrong, or those that believed it were wrong.

Starting point is 00:23:14 Now, last point on that, the thing that was actually hurting people, the dangerous gene therapy experimental shots, with God knows what else going on that we now know our DNA contaminated, that have all sorts of unnecessary proteins that are causing all sorts of unparalleled problems in the body because of the N1 methyl pseudo-eudoridine modified RNA that's completely making it last and continue to circulate through your body, which of course is the main point about the, oh, now I forget, no, I'm not, I can't remember the one that I think he should pull these up so quickly.

Starting point is 00:23:53 Anyway, the point that the spike protein continue to circulate through your body. the point is Kevin McCurnin points out in the new study. Spike protein, MRNA, or the MRNA that carries the instructions to make the spike protein and the protein itself found in the placentas after women give birth. I mean, this is exactly what we've been telling you. Not only does it go everywhere long after you take these dangerous things, but it absolutely then passes to your children through the breast milk and the fact that these things, and this goes to the level of actual like integration with your DNA, like the fact,

Starting point is 00:24:26 fact that these are studies that we've continued not not this in particular but that that is exactly i think we've got four different studies that have shown that even science that or i just talked about it more evidence that shows that this does integrate with your dna the point though is that this is everything they said didn't happen everything and it actually has simon down here dr simon got simon got permaband from this platform for raising questions about that two years ago here's the study itself the results the vaccine mrna was detected in the two placentos tested using PCR test. The location of the vaccine, which very rightly so should question that as well, the location of the vaccine MRA was mainly in the Villastroma with a notably high signal

Starting point is 00:25:06 in the diduida, how do you say that, ducedua, interesting word, basically other parts of the placenta and so on. It's so funny, I'm never embarrassed to try to pronounce these things. A lot of people laugh, but I don't care. It doesn't matter. It's because people don't have, understand how every word is pronounced. Doesn't, you know, understanding things is quite different. compared to that of patient too. The bottom line is very clear. The spike protein expression was detected in these. In one of them, not the other, but the ultimate MRNA was detected throughout.

Starting point is 00:25:38 The point is that this is multiple, multiple studies have found this. Here's the title itself. Transplacental transmission of the COVID-19 vaccine MRNA. Now, when I just said that about the studies, I meant specifically that this stuff is found throughout the body. The placenta seems to be a new aspect of it, but their own studies show that. the lipid nanopartical concentration in the liver and the spleen, but everywhere in your body, who's the point? And I don't know why we didn't understand what that meant at the time where people willfully ignored that. But I think that's really important to understand that this stuff is

Starting point is 00:26:09 still hurting people. So keep that in mind. We'll continue to follow up on this. Let's talk about a interesting conversation that seems to be eclipsing everything important in my mind around Tucker Carlson. Now, you guys know well that I'm very skeptical of most anybody that's in the corporate media, especially people that have the kind of ties he do. But that does, but that doesn't mean that I blindly dismiss. References work over the years. I think you know me about the point that anybody coming from any platform or any person, information is still information.

Starting point is 00:26:43 Doesn't matter who says it if you can vet it and prove it for yourself. This is interesting to me for multiple reasons. Now, clearly after this Fox News dispute, which, by the way, I don't know, like last I left with this conversation, he was still under contract with Fox. know if that petered out and the time has lapsed. But there's this weird thing where everyone was like, I have a weird suspicion about the way this is even working out, right? Tucker on X and all this stuff. It's just like, really, like there's a very clear transition happening right now with the way, Steve and I've talked about the reimagining the way journalism works and the Twitter

Starting point is 00:27:17 files and, you know, and they're all praising Elon like he's saving free speech. Well, even though we can all literally prove that's not what's happening and people are being censored all over the place. So when they people like this, lean into that, at the very least, you have to acknowledge that they're kind of pulling punches when it comes to things like X. And maybe you think, well, that's a means to an end. Okay, you can make up the narrative however you want. It's still a level of dishonesty. Like, for example, showing how there's been times that he has said that he was never, when I was on Fox, I could say whatever I want. Well, that's clearly not true.

Starting point is 00:27:49 Looking back, clearly. And it wasn't just that last one thing, which is why he left. You can clearly point out there's things that were suppressed, things that he wasn't saying and that you could now prove. Or for example, him saying off record that he hates Donald Trump and he's the worst person and I can't wait to not talk about him anymore, but then publicly saying, yeah, we're all supporting him. There's just obvious things like that, which it's not unique to Tucker or unique to corporate media. Those things matter, though. And I think at a large level, I think it becomes interesting to see how these kind of things are being controlled, in my opinion. And this is an example of that.

Starting point is 00:28:21 Journalists criticized Tucker Carlson over Putin interview. Okay. Is this that unique? I mean, let's be really clear about this outside of the two-party paradigm. First of all, Putin takes interviews. He's interviewed people, maybe not in U.S. focus, but reasonably, I mean, I've seen his interviews more than once where he says the same kind of things that we can expect about criticizing Western policy and so on.

Starting point is 00:28:45 But nonetheless, any world leader in an interview has relevance because they're a world leader, no matter who they are, right? I think we can all agree on that. Not that you may think it's important, but there's relevance to it. So when Tucker or anybody interviews somebody like Putin, there's, it's, well, I'm interested. I want to see what they say, right?

Starting point is 00:29:02 But it shouldn't be in my mind that it's like this unparalleled, unprecedented thing that it's kind of being framed at. Then it becomes the idea that he's somehow, which I think is equally ridiculous, and I'm going to criticize it here, he's somehow, you know, doing something wrong.

Starting point is 00:29:16 Like he's a traitor for talking to Putin. That's so ridiculously childish. and I'll show you the examples. And the point is, that's always been the way it's supposed to go. And they all know that. So at one level, there are people in the paradigm that would see this as Tucker being suppressed. They're attacking him because he's doing the right thing. And that's what I think this becomes.

Starting point is 00:29:35 Now, what's the real story? The interview hasn't even happened yet. And the story is Tucker Carlson's being suppressed because he's fighting for the truth. I don't believe that's what's happening. I think this is about politics. And even if you think that this is just an actual effort to go after him because he's the right versus the left, it's still not really about some profound thing that you're going to find through the interview, at least how I see it so far. So I think this is about, in my opinion, as I would see

Starting point is 00:30:01 it through the two-party illusion, setting him up as the suppressed censored journalist fighting to get the truth out to you when really you're just going through the motions doing the same thing you have the entire time and have access to somebody like Putin. I think what's real even more interesting is I'm going to predict that the way this will turn out is the interview will happen. And it will be an interview with Putin. There'll be things that it'll be said that it'll be like, yeah, he's criticizing Western foreign policy. He's calling out what they're doing in Ukraine. He's accusing them of doing all these big things that are, that would, I would also find interesting, even going to the level of claims of bio labs and things that will get your attention. Now, that's important, no matter who's

Starting point is 00:30:38 giving the interview, but is it that different than anything you've heard him say before, hypothetically? It wouldn't be other than Tucker's the one doing it and he's doing it through suppression. So the story becomes Tucker is being suppressed and getting this out as opposed to what the interview's context and content was about. That's my prediction. The story is him doing this and being suppressed. That's already the way it's set up. I'm willing to bet you that's the point of all of it. Tell me, maybe I'm jaded.

Starting point is 00:31:08 Certainly possible. I don't believe this is going to be anything other than manufacturing the idea that he is suppressed and censored and getting people to blindly follow along with what happens. That's my personal opinion. Fiorella Isabel, it says, Jen Pisaki labels Tucker a conspiracy theorist. For interviewing a world leader? I mean, that doesn't even connect. I mean, it's just hilarious to me.

Starting point is 00:31:32 But it says, for actually interviewing Putin in Russia while she sits in D.C. lying and rewriting history. I completely agree with that. Interviewing pre-selected State Department guests, exactly. Asking pre-selected State Department, limited questions, exactly, and pushing for more war via CIA talking points, all after she left her job as the press secretary for the most war-mongering administration

Starting point is 00:31:52 we've ever seen in a recent history. I agree with all of that. Like I complete, like, and I would even go as far as to say that people like Pissaki have no idea about what I might think is the larger agenda. They probably hate this person. They probably actually think they're fighting the Republicans

Starting point is 00:32:04 because I don't think most of these people are truly in the know about the larger game being played. They may have a sneaking suspicion about it. Some of them may be involved. That's my personal opinion. But I don't believe that the Grams, the Maxine Waters,

Starting point is 00:32:17 the Nancy Pelosi's, the Biden, the Trumps really know what's going on. Just my personal opinion. I think that they're being played like everybody else. But here's what's interesting. The whole narrative is Putin, Tucker's doing the thing that nobody else is doing, that nobody wants to interview Putin, but that's not entirely accurate. But let me show you what I mean by that. First of all, here is what this person who I've made fun of many times is saying,

Starting point is 00:32:39 Christine, I'm on poor. Tucker, does Tucker really think we journalists? We'll make fun of that in a second. haven't been trying to interview President Putin every day since his full-scale invasion of Ukraine, it's absurd. We'll continue to ask for interview, just as we have for years now. Now, I don't, my take on that is, I do think that's true, but I don't think it's entirely true. I don't think Christine or any rest of these puppet mainstream journalists, they're very aware that there would be frowned upon, that the apparatus, the system,

Starting point is 00:33:10 the establishment would probably penalize them for doing, like, that's what I would argue, that they know that so they kind of actively omit and avoid and, you know, but I would still argue, I bet you at some level there are offers for interviews and I would understand why Putin one to one interview with these ridiculous people. And here's exactly one of those points, as Eva Bartlett points out. During an interview, Ammanpur thrust a photo of a Lepo boy, the one that they manipulated at Sergei Lavrov and implied Russia had injured him on the bombing, even though we now know that was a completely manufactured lie. His father and him testified to that, but there was no airstrike and she interviewed with the family and and and the am on par no so

Starting point is 00:33:50 you flush you push this picture in front of him when you're wrong about the story without doing any due diligence because you're a narrative management right but the point is and she wonders why they don't want to interview with her because they know she's a liar or at the very least blindly goes along with western talking points without that means you not you're not a journalist you're a stenographer for the state so that's why makes perfect sense so i bet you it's a little bit both. I don't think she really wants that because she knows it's not going to sit well with her state controllers, but at the same time, it's not going to be accepted because they see her for that. So it's kind of an open, you know, they both play that game. But my point is to see now then push

Starting point is 00:34:26 back in such a way to argue that, or just jump ed real quickly, that, oh my God, we're going to sanction Tucker Carlson, which not sure whether that's the truth or not. Well, how does that make sense? Why would the EU or anybody else penalize him for doing this when the argument is, at least the stated narrative that they're trying to do that as well. So if she got an interview with Putin, would they sanction her? Like my point is, it doesn't make sense. Because again, historically, this happens all the time. In fact, here is Amunpur right there. Ammanpur, I'm on poor, how you say your last name, interviewing Assad. So, I mean, what are we talking about? Why, it's my, I guess the only overarching point, this feels wildly manufactured. I think that's

Starting point is 00:35:08 clear by now. If she's interviewing Assad, how, was that any different? Are we pretending the times had changed since then? And now it's a war crime, the interview and adversary. It doesn't make much sense. But Kavork-Almaseen responds after her thing about we journalists saying because you have a track record of not really doing journalism, but rather delivering threatening messages from American deep state, which is what she did here. Exactly the point. But if they've done this before, if she's arguing we're trying to get that interview with Putin, my whole argument is it doesn't really add up that they would react this way, unless you think there really is a two-party agenda,

Starting point is 00:35:42 playing here. That's, I'm sure a lot of the people that support Tucker think that the Democrats are out to get him. I just can't believe how naive that is. Truly, that's my opinion. I do believe that there are individuals within that that might believe it, like I said, the Pelosi's of the world, but I don't, I don't believe this is truly about the long-term game of trying to, you know, like that he's fighting for your freedom and truth by interviewing Putin and they're trying to stop him. I just, to me, it sounds like a cartoon. But this, this guy points out what's his Krasenstein, whoever, people reported this, my point. The European Union is said to be seeking sanctioned and a travel ban because of this.

Starting point is 00:36:19 But then they spoke up and said that's not true at all, and that's not happening. So is this more Republican talking points meant to make it sound like that's the case, which would really make sense to me? Maybe. Or they said it because it's about trying to keep the narrative going and they try to walk it back. But I think your start, you can see that this does not feel genuine. Dr. Eli David, of course, Mr. Propagandist for Israel, said something very interesting. Again, with his clumsy, ridiculous, you know, not thought through propaganda, he actually made a point for us here.

Starting point is 00:36:52 He says, I see all the outrage for Tucker Carlson interviewing Putin. Where is that outrage when CNN, BBC, interview Hamas leaders? Hey, great. Good point there. Except the point that he's trying to make is not the point that I'm making. The point is they do do that. So what's the difference here? are they allowed to interview this person here, but he's not over there?

Starting point is 00:37:11 Aha, because they want you looking at the Hamas leaders, right? And so it's sort of like this allowed concept. But in this case, I think I argue that they ultimately want this whole dynamic to look like Tucker's being suppressed and trying to interview Putin. And yeah, I would argue that they don't want you hearing what he has to say about Western foreign policy. But ultimately, the outrage seems feigned. It seems because Hamas, they're telling you are the biggest terrorists of the world right now, right? It doesn't add up. It really doesn't.

Starting point is 00:37:40 Lastly, true stream media points out this absurd, like laughable, as they write, is this a date we're watching? This is a CNN journalist interviewing Zelensky. But Zelensky's on the good guy team, so we're allowed to, even though he's a neo-Nazi working with Nazi groups, but he's a Jewish, so you're not allowed to say that. It's stupid, even though Israel openly funded the Ozav movement the entire time. Oh, we can't talk about that. But the point is, obviously, that they do have interviews like this with world leaders on certain sides of a But only one is allowed. And the point is it's not really an interview.

Starting point is 00:38:11 It's a big fluff story about how, what do you think about at night when you're going to bed? And it's like dumb questions like that. It's all nonsense. And guys, Tucker was a part of this nonsense and still is, in my opinion. So on that note, let's talk about Haiti. Because you really have to consider how these conversations, these important real world conversations, like what's going on in Palestine right now. The people, the actual people, their family. and what they're dealing with on the ground every day in their day-to-day moment-to-moment lives

Starting point is 00:38:43 and how that's covered or not by people in those positions. I really want us to think about that in the larger point, because I think that it's selective omission. There's a lot of point. Obviously, I think the larger point about the independent versus corporate and in-between media is that there's an effort right now to kind of retake what they've clearly lost, which, by the way, began before October 7th. But I think because of that, it's gotten desperate.

Starting point is 00:39:09 So they're trying to regain this control. And that's why, through a lot of these points, you're going to see this kind of stuff. You're going to see the corporate media entities like CNN suddenly stepping up to say the right thing. And I think it's desperate. Like Pierce Morgan, for example, if we get there today, had an interview where I argue. And maybe he is just coming around. I don't believe that. I don't believe someone like him is just suddenly after all these years going,

Starting point is 00:39:34 aha, I don't believe that. You've got to be a pretty stupid person to not be able to see it by now. But I argue they're trying to regain some clout, some points by just going, okay, we're going to take the heat from the groups like the Zionist state of Israel to potentially regain some influence in the media because we've lost it all. Because they're not stupid. They know everybody sees what's going on. So they're going to try to lie to you about it. Before we get to Israel, though, again, because in what's going on in the Middle East in particular,

Starting point is 00:40:05 states like Haiti are recognizing or other the peoples within them, one, that they've been suppressed and stolen from by outside powers since, I mean, really since the original creation of the state, and they're done with that. They're tired of being exploited for other, for the gain of outside countries while watching their country continue to decline.

Starting point is 00:40:29 And that's what we're staring at. There's been a U.S. puppet after U.S. puppet in this location. You, I mean, Haiti goes, we talk about the Clinton Foundation. There's a lot of overlaps here. But what we're staring out here, in my opinion, is the people of Haiti rising up to try to remove a puppet that they see an opportunity to remove because of everything else going on. But at the same time, it's never that simple. I think there are elements already of the U.S. government, both in Haiti and in the Democratic Republic of Congo, we'll talk about next, already trying to influence those movements on the ground. and this is an important thing to think about in a regime change or even like this in a situation

Starting point is 00:41:07 where you have a U.S. puppet in power, right? And they see the writing on the wall. They see that people are going to remove them from power. There's another game to this where they can influence those protests from the ground and you're still going to lose. You're still going to lose the power you may have maintained over that sitting president as the puppet you had, but you can at least maybe control the direction of the other loss, right? One side of it is they remove this guy from power. That's a loss, right? But on the other side of it, you could potentially guide these new movements to pick or align with somebody who still might give you some level of influence. So you lose either way, but you can guide the loss. I hope that makes sense. Because in other

Starting point is 00:41:47 cases, you just have a pro, you know, a puppet or excuse me, a president that's not willing to bow to U.S. interest or Western interests, and they carry out a regime change to remove them from power so they can maximize their interest in the country. Export things, exploit the country for their own benefit at the expense of the people while claiming to fight for their freedom. Right. So that's a, that's a complete benefit. That's a win for them. And you can see how that goes very simply. But if they lose that, they can still try to guide it to somebody. And this is how we see a lot of these movements. Like, think about how things in the United States have been influenced, different movements trying to rise up against, like even

Starting point is 00:42:23 something as simple as the Occupy movement. As we can look back and see that there was clear FBI infiltration that was deliberately, and there's documents to this, designed to drive it into the ground and make it look ridiculous because it had very clear momentum. And that's how that works. You still ultimately lost in a way because people are paying attention, but you just decide to kind of collapse that movement in a way that taints the way you view it going forward. So here, this is from today, TRT World Report, that at least two protesters have been killed during ongoing violent demonstrations in 80s capital.

Starting point is 00:42:56 So it's interesting. Where's the U.S. government? Aren't they the ones that just lose their minds when protesters get, shot even one or two when it's somebody they don't like doing it. But you might not be surprised to find out this keeps happening and they don't care. They haven't said a word about this. And this was happening before October 7th. So where have they been about that? Do they not care about these people? Are these people less important? Is it because they're a different color? Like, you have to think of something. Ultimately, I think it's truly because they don't care what

Starting point is 00:43:24 happens to people in any country, no matter what, as long as they get what they want. So as long as they've got what they want coming out of the country, you do whatever you want. That's the important thing to understand. So let's start going kind of chronologically to a degree from an article from 2016. Former Haitian president of Senate exposes Clinton Foundation. Hillary Clinton tried to bribe me. So I thought we'd start here just to show you this does not start. This is not just a new concept.

Starting point is 00:43:54 And by the way, this didn't start 2016 either. This goes back a long way. As far as some people would argue from the original creation of the state itself, Well, what's important to understand is that your government has been as far back as you want to look, doing everything it could to manipulate this country for all sorts of different reasons. Geostrategic control over the area, resources taken from the area. I mean, it's the same stuff you'd expect anywhere else. So what we're going to start with in this case is one of a former president of the Senate speaking up in front of Donald Trump, by the way, you've seen this, and expressing the fact that the Clinton-Fellon. foundation, have bribed them, has manipulated, have used these resources, have a lot of people

Starting point is 00:44:37 to die for their own benefit. And this is important to understand. So I was president of the Senate in Haiti in 1990. That was Trump for the podcast. That's Trump sitting, I think it's in Miami. I'll read the article next. When Bill Clinton invaded the island. And I have the record.

Starting point is 00:45:01 Clinton invaded the island, he says. About the Clinton Foundation. And I want to have a few minutes today to talk about that. Mr. First of all, to understand where I come from, I am from both cultures. I am from the American culture because I came here at a very early age. And while you went to New York Military Academy, I went to New Jersey, a military academy in New Jersey. About the same time, we are about the same age. You could have been my underclassman.

Starting point is 00:45:34 So really, you understand me, and I will understand. than you. But my dream was to go back to Haiti. To do for Haiti what I had seen in the United States. Free enterprise system. The justice system you have

Starting point is 00:45:52 here and fight corruption in Haiti. And in 1991, I was elected Senator of Haiti. The same year, Jean-Bertan Alistee was elected president. In February of 1994, I became president of the Senate.

Starting point is 00:46:11 And I had to deal with the Clinton invasion of Haiti. And I learned so much about the Clinton because I was working so much with the American intelligence at that time. Clinton wanted to buy me out. Now, just make sure you did miss what he said. I mean, you could hear that more than one way, right? That he just working with...

Starting point is 00:46:35 The fact that he said working with American intelligence that to me is very different than working with the government to, you know, achieve a certain end. That is, I think that's arguing, you know, the meddling of the U.S. intelligence, which, by the way, happens every day all over the world. But if, you know, Russia has a certain, you know, the point is that they call meddling anything all the time that they do everywhere else in the world. For the Clinton, because I was working so much with the American intelligence at that time.

Starting point is 00:47:06 Clinton wanted to buy me out. And to buy out the Senate president, bribing. I remember that I was hitting very hard on several fronts today show, good morning America, and once I was in nightline with Senator Dune. And to try to appease me, he sent me Bill Richardson, who was actually Congressman at that time. And I spent four hours with Bill Richardson. in my office in Porroquence, explaining to him how they should not invade Haiti and how this was a bad idea to return our steep to power.

Starting point is 00:47:50 And I even mentioned that President Reagan in 1986 had sent one airplane to pick up Duvalier. I said, that's the way to do it. You want to get rid of those general southern airplane? I will help them into that airplane. So we spent four hours I discussed it with Bill Richardson because I said to Bill, take the message

Starting point is 00:48:16 back to President Clinton. I know you are here because he sent you. A week later, after my conversation with Bill Richardson, the American Embassy called me, as it was often the case, and then said, President Clinton has a messenger for you. I said, send him over.

Starting point is 00:48:37 He came. Did not give me his name, but told me Mr. Sancery, you join our movement. You side will Bill Clinton in this invasion and will make you the richest man in Haiti. Think about that. Now, you could always argue he's lying, but the evidence is overwhelming. And the sad thing is, I don't think anybody even dispute. Everyone knows this. People just for different political reasons choose to admit it, ignore it, dismiss it.

Starting point is 00:49:05 But this is different, I mean, again, I always reference the, the two men from Boston that presented this in front of Congress about the pay for play in regard to the Clinton Foundation. I mean, it was scathing. They had the receipts. Not only did nothing happen, I mean, they didn't even bring it up again after that. Just went away. I said, sir, tell President Clinton for me, Bernard Sensureit is not for sale. I have principle and I love my country.

Starting point is 00:49:35 A week later, by executive order, Clinton revoked my visa. I was then a resident of the United States. I am now a citizen of the United States. So you're playing with someone's live, or so you revoked their visa because you didn't take the bribe we offered. That's your government right there. This is how it's been in Haiti.

Starting point is 00:50:00 The Clinton went after the invasion. They started a cellular company called Fusion International. To make a long story short, now it's DG Cell. who is taking over and his friend Dennis O'Brien has given millions to the Clinton Foundation. In 2010,

Starting point is 00:50:22 the earthquake of Haiti, not only American taxpayers, but the whole world has given billions of dollars to the Clinton Foundation for the Haitians. Not only, not even

Starting point is 00:50:37 2% of that money went back to Haiti. So Mr. Trump, we are asking you. Not even 2%. And I have some articles I'll give you to go more deep on that, that some I wrote myself back then. The amount of money that was siphoned off. I mean, they got a fraction,

Starting point is 00:50:55 a fraction of a fraction of what was donated. You know, Wycliffe Sean was helping, who knows whether that was intentional or not, driving up all these donations, and the Clinton Foundation stole almost all of it. Nobody went to jail for that. People died because of it, though. Begging you, the Haitian community,

Starting point is 00:51:11 will side with you if one day you ask Hillary Clinton publicly to disclose the audit of all the money they have stolen from Haiti in 2010 after the earthquake. He's speaking to Donald Trump, right? And he's saying everybody in Haiti will support you if you commit to doing this,

Starting point is 00:51:30 which he pretended he would and then fell short on. And this guy spoke up later and said he did not follow through. I thought he was a different person. I'll show you that next. So the point is the guy who was saying, lock her up. Not only did he have the opportunity to put this person in prison, he had people begging him with all the receipts to expose other aspects of her criminality. And not only did he not do that, he was making friends with her later. Oh, she's a good person. We don't need to go after

Starting point is 00:51:56 that. Remember that? It's amazing the kind of stuff that Trump supporters ignored to continue supporting him. For those just tuning in, they're all dumb. They're all crazy. Left right, Biden, Trump, they're all crazy. Don't take that as some kind of side point. that I somehow secretly support the Democrats. They're all crazy. Your government is out to get you, guys. That's the reality. Haiti is a very poor country.

Starting point is 00:52:27 Haiti needs defenders. You said you will champion our cards. We welcome you, sir. And we will work with you. But please ask publicly Hillary Clinton, during your next debate, to publish the audit of all the money, they have stolen from Haiti.

Starting point is 00:52:49 Yes. Thank you, sir. Thank you. Didn't happen. So here's what he said later. So that was 2000, that was 2016, I believe. Right, he closed it. Hold on. Yeah, 2016.

Starting point is 00:53:07 So 2019. Disillusioned Haitian American voters, not sure about Trump. So just this is the point. The Haitian-born Republican activist was president of the Haitian Senate in 94. That's him. officially obtaining U.S. citizenship in 2006, as he was discussing, San Surique was dedicated to establishing democracy in his native country. He said he was hopeful in 2016 when Trump, as a Republican

Starting point is 00:53:30 nominee, visited Miami's Little Haiti. Trump claimed then that he would be the greatest champion and hold former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton accountable for what he saw as her failures in the aftermath of the deadly earthquake impacting at least three million people in the island nation. he then said San Serica had taken Trump at his word when the promise was made but now feels that he has fallen short quote my understanding was that Trump

Starting point is 00:53:55 would be a better man he would do something for Haiti we all put our chances on Trump got all the votes sure enough but my heart can no longer tell me to support him he has done absolutely nothing for Haiti I must just sit here I must just sit this election out pretty sad

Starting point is 00:54:11 so that this is first of all the reality of how obvious this is, the two-party illusion of it all. Think about the political win it would have been under the perception that Trump was not part of the government, but rather the Republican side of this, if he would have exposed all of this. But of course not.

Starting point is 00:54:31 Now, this was 2017. I wrote this at the time. The doctor who exposed the Clinton Foundation corruption in Haiti, the same thing he was just pointing out, found dead. And I've gone over this a few times. He was speaking up about this. He was sending emails. Yeah, as it says here in 2010, the doctor decided to send an email to a confidant detailing this affront to the Haitian people, which ended up being forwarded to Cheryl Mills of all people, who at the time was chief of staff to none other than Hillary Clinton.

Starting point is 00:55:00 The doctor's correspondence, which has been provided by WikiLeaks, the link is right there, was highly critical of how the situation with Haiti was being handled. Disaster management on the ground was non-existent. Cheerios and the tarmac are not getting it done. These patients, which clearly would be savable if, which clearly would be savable, good care would be urgently provided, which it wasn't. Once we arrived, we saw a severely damaged hospital, no running water. Think about that. Millions and tens and hundreds of millions of dollars flying across for this, they don't even have running water.

Starting point is 00:55:31 Only limited electrical power, a generator. Surgery is being performed in an equivalent of a large storage closet, where amputations performed with hacksaws. This facility could not nearly accommodate the equipment nor the expertise to treat the volume of injuries they saw. They saw scores of patients with pus dripping out of open extremities, fractures with crushed injury with and crush injuries. Some wounds were already ridden with maggots. About a third of these victims were children.

Starting point is 00:55:57 The entire hospital smelled of infected, rotting limbs and death. Later on, he said they would judge their surgical progress by the diminishment of the stench. He says, our naivety, we didn't expect that the two anesthesia machines would not work, that there would be only one cottery available in the entire hospital to stop bleeding. that an operating room sterilizer fit only instruments the size of a cigar box, that there would be no sterile, no functioning fluoroscopy machine, no blood for transfusions, no ability to do lab work. And the only local staff was a rag-tag group of volunteer health providers

Starting point is 00:56:33 who, like us, had made it there on their own. Until the departure, he said they witnessed pallets of Cheerios and dry goods just sitting on the tarback, helping nobody. Yet our flight of critical medical equipment and personnel had been cancer. sold and the equipment that did get through was hijacked. This was the reality, guys. This guy died, was killed. They argue he stabbed himself in the chest with the knife.

Starting point is 00:56:59 Like, think about that. I mean, that's about as dumb as arguing Gary Webb shot himself twice in the head, which is still what the establishment actually argues the truth is. That this medical professional, knowing how impossible it would be to stab a knife in your own hand through your chestplate, by the way. Apparently they say, I, Abby, stabbed itself while his child, by the way, was still with him. I mean, it's

Starting point is 00:57:23 unreal. This is a common story, as you guys know. Sad reality is, this is what happened, and your government, groups that are supposed to be holding people accountable, nothing happened at all. Here's another one, 2017. Haiti official exposed the Clinton

Starting point is 00:57:39 Foundation, found dead. I mean, the number is unreal. People dying in the most random way, that get deemed suicide who all just so happen to be calling out stuff like this. And this is an interesting one. Ben Swan exposed the truth about U.S. foreign aid and the Clinton Foundation's Haitian fraud. I'm going to play this for you. I wasn't planning on playing the whole thing.

Starting point is 00:58:00 But what's funny about this is I published this and this was from his reality check. But I went to get it and it was gone, which not surprising because his channel got deleted and so on. So I was going to go find it, right? Nowhere. I literally couldn't find this try it for yourself the actual video I think was called

Starting point is 00:58:19 what was it again yeah I've got right here it's I actually I was able to whoops that's not or one oh there we go I want to open here so I was able to download it

Starting point is 00:58:30 onto sovereign which is by the way it was called reality check if Haiti is a you know it was a for plug of ears earmuffs for the children shit whole country

Starting point is 00:58:39 who is really to blame that's when Trump said that remember now you type in that and you search for it I mean my God I looked at Odyssey, I couldn't find it anywhere, which is just strange.

Starting point is 00:58:50 And so I had to literally find this on the archive. I had to find the YouTube video link, which in and of itself was difficult, then find the archive, then find this video, and it still wasn't able to download it. So I had to just screen record the damn thing and upload it to Sovereign because my website wouldn't let me upload it. Now I'm not saying all of that is because they don't want you to see this, but my God, that seems a little strange, doesn't it? So I thought, you know what?

Starting point is 00:59:13 We're going to play the whole damn thing. It's only eight minutes. because maybe they just don't want you to see it. But either way, it's a great, this is kind of great work that Penn Swan was doing before he got basically, you know, became persona non grata after he dared to point out the legitimacy of the claims around

Starting point is 00:59:26 the conversation that was deemed pizza game. Not that there was a lot of BS around that whole thing, but there was very valid points that were discussed with all that that he decided to break down and show you the validity of. And he did with the receipts and everything. But of course, that was not what you were supposed to hear. So he got boxed out. But I'm glad it happened because it's

Starting point is 00:59:44 something we need people like Ben Swan on the side of the truth. But let's watch this. Showing you yet again how they just straight up stole money from dying people and acted like they were the heroes and never got any accountability for it. Well, it's been a couple of weeks, but I had to take this one on. President Trump reportedly refers to African nation. Well, it's been a couple of weeks, but I had to take this one on. President Trump reportedly refers to African nations as well as the island nation of Haiti as a shithole. The media, both on the left and the right, lose their collective minds.

Starting point is 01:00:18 But here's the problem. While media and politicians want to fight about Haiti, nobody seems to care that Haitians had been ripped off by American foreign aid and politicians for years. Let's give it a reality check you won't get anywhere else. Reality check with Ben Swan, powered by not recorded. Trump, they were reported, but not recorded. Here's what the Washington Post was the first to claim. President Trump discussed protecting immigrants from Haiti, El Salvador, and African

Starting point is 01:00:45 and African countries as part of a bipartisan immigration deal, according to several people briefed on the meeting. Why are we having all these people from shithole countries come here? Trump said, referring to countries mentioned by the lawmakers. Why do we need more Haitians? Trump asked, according to people familiar with the meeting, take them out. Well, by now you know the media lost its collective mind. See, on the left, all they could talk about is what a racist savage President Trump is. Listen.

Starting point is 01:01:11 Well, they went to make a deal with the devil, and they discovered. covered two things. He wasn't ready to make a deal, but he really is the devil. This remarked by the president of the United States smacks of blatant racism. I mean, it just adds to all of the emotion and it adds to the horror. And then on the right, it was an effort to defend the use of the word, with commentators insisting it's really okay because that's what Haiti really is. Lawmakers in both parties came together in grave agreement that it was unfortunate, unacceptable, indeed threatening that President Trump would refer to poor and dangerous countries as in effect poor and dangerous.

Starting point is 01:01:55 This was leaked by Democrats, his political opponents because they thought it would hurt him. I don't think it did hurt him. So he's using salty language to make an obvious point. Even if he did say it, which we still don't know, this outrage is phony. Lefties, you can't have it both ways. He can't claim we need to let everyone in to protect them from terrible conditions in their home countries, then turn around and tell us they're coming from great and stable places. Sorry, pick one.

Starting point is 01:02:19 Well, of course, the problem with all this is that the debate hasn't been about Haiti. It's been about Trump. The argument is over whether Donald Trump is racist or whether he is right. And there's an obvious way, the two-party illusion pits you against each other about something that's tangential to the real point they're trying to keep away from your view. and we end up diving into the conversation about whether Trump is racist around Haiti's conversation instead of the reality that they're all allowing Haiti to be completely exploited. That's how that works. But that argument robs the Haitian people of the debate that we should be having.

Starting point is 01:02:53 The debate over why that country has remained in abject poverty and with an unemployment rate of over 40%, even with billions of dollars and reinvestment flowing there. Reality check here, those billions of dollars, they never got to the Haitian people. And that's the discussion we should be having. See, it was January of 2010 when a massive 7.0 earthquake struck the island of Haiti. It killed an estimated 220,000 people, leveling 100,000 homes and leaving 1.5 million people destitute. Some 13.3 billion was pledged by international donors for Haiti's recovery. Now, at the time, Hillary Clinton was Secretary of State.

Starting point is 01:03:29 Her husband, former President Bill Clinton, he was appointed co-chairman of the Interim Haiti Recovery Commission, the IHRC, along with the Haitian Prime Minister. So what happened? Well, of the $13.3 billion pledge, some $9 billion actually came in as the total international funding. It's an incredible amount of money. The problem is that money was wasted. It was mismanaged and it went just about everywhere except to the actual Haitian organizations. And I do not think that's by accident, guys. That's by design. That's how this is supposed to work. Now, there's plenty of theories about, you know, earthquakes being engineered and, you know, whether or not you think something was designed to happen or did happen because they made it. The point is simply that this is how these vultures, for lack of better word, this is how they operate, right?

Starting point is 01:04:18 You see, these people were devastated by this earthquake and their first thought is, oh, my God, we can exploit that to hell. Heaven, however you want to look at it. We can exploit that as far as we've ever explored. We can make all this money off the backs of their suffering and then even get convinced some people that we helped them. That's how this works. And of course, this is what they did, right? And so whether or not, you know, and this is, you could, and the reason I said that first

Starting point is 01:04:43 point is because in many cases, these things are executed, whether it's a war, weaponized migration, destabilization, regime changes. These things are executed and then secondarily taken advantage of. USAID comes in to, quote, help them. Is that what actually happens? Well, this is, this is USAID right here, not explicitly and by itself, My point is this is what happens, as Corbett's written about, the NGO Trojan horses. What, I mean, we really as just honest and free-thinking people of the world,

Starting point is 01:05:16 we need to be honest and open and explicit about the understanding of what these people and these governments and these institutions truly are. It's just time to stop pulling. It's time to stop pulling punches, whether it's about the U.S. creating funding and using the proxy army of ISIS or whether. whether it's about the illegal occupations of the different countries or whatever these things are. The reality we need to stop pulling punches about. In fact, on this chart from the BBC, you see that of the $6 billion that came in from bilateral and multilateral donors,

Starting point is 01:05:50 89.8% went to non-Hatian organizations. Some 580 million went to the Haitian government, and around one half of 1% went to Haitian organizations. So right there, the point is that you have 580 million that went to the government, which you could argue is what is what's supposed to happen. But typically, especially in this kind of situation where you know that there's a puppet sitting there put there by the United States, that's just a, you know, that does not translate to helping the people. But then specifically Haitian organizations, 0.06.

Starting point is 01:06:20 In fact, I believe it was actually 0.6. I think there was an update in his bottom. That was a typo they put out there on the screen. Regardless, a fraction of a fraction. 9 billion ends up being 0.6% of that. That actually goes to people on the ground. while Clinton and her lackeys and the foundation itself is swimming in revenue. The vast majority of the funding went to UN agencies, international aid groups, private contractors,

Starting point is 01:06:47 and donor countries own civilian and military agencies. Now, a lot of people, of course, have blamed the Clintons personally for... That's why suffering and tragedy is big business. What happened in Haiti. Perhaps some of that criticism is unfair. And perhaps it's not. For instance, thanks to diplomatic... cables released by WikiLeaks, we know this, that one U.S. envoy described the value to contractors

Starting point is 01:07:10 who were eager to cash in as a gold rush. According to the BBC, in email exchanges with top Clinton Foundation officials, a senior aide to Mrs. Clinton, who was then Secretary of State, kept an eye out for those identified with the abbreviations, FOB or Friends of Go Clinton, or WJC VIPs, need to flag people when they are friends of WJC wrote a C. This is pay to play right here, right? I mean, you're allowing these people to come in with their money and act like they're helping when really they're siphoning money and resources. And this is what they do. And don't miss the parallels to what we're seeing right now with Gaza, with many number

Starting point is 01:07:44 of different situations, right? There are people that are trying to act like they're here to help when really they're taking advantage. Senior State Department official who was vetting incoming offers of assistance through the Clinton Foundation. So who are some of those friends who have gotten sweetheart deals at least appeared to? Well, according to the National Review, the Clinton Foundation selected Clayton Homes, a construction company owned by Warren Buffett's Berkshire Hathaway to build temporary shelters in Haiti.

Starting point is 01:08:08 Buffett is an active member of the Clinton Global Initiative who donated generously to the Clintons as well as the Clinton Foundation. The contract was supposed to be given through normal United Nations bidding process, with the deal going to the lowest bidder who met the project standards. UN officials said, however, that the contract was never competitively bid for. Again, according to the National Review, the Clintons also funneled some $10 million to a firm called Inovita, headed by Clinton donor, Claudio Osorio. Inovina's application was fast-tracked and approved in two weeks. The company, however, defaulted on the loan and never built any houses. An investigation revealed that Osorio had diverted company funds to pay for his Miami Beach mansion, his Maserati, and his Colorado ski chalet.

Starting point is 01:08:50 He also pleaded guilty to wire fraud and money laundering in 2013. He's currently serving a 12-year prison term on fraud charges related to that loan. Now, there are many other stories just like those, but perhaps. the biggest mess in all of Hiddies recovery, or lack thereof, was what the Clinton Foundation touted as a signature project, a garment factory known as the Carcol Industrial Park. The project was funded by the U.S. government. It cost hundreds of millions of dollars in taxpayer money. It was the largest single allocation of U.S. relief aid. With a foundation working with the Clinton State Department helped to arrange a U.S. subsidized

Starting point is 01:09:24 deal with the Haitian government to build a $300 million dollar factory complex in 2012. Is that what Haitian people want? Like think about this. You're in the middle of a catastrophe, right? People are trying to rebuild their lives, and you're talking about building a massive factory for jobs, and you'll see the worst part after that, like assuming they're even going to get those jobs,

Starting point is 01:09:43 which they didn't. Why is that? This is like coming in when people are starving in Gaza and going, here's a COVID-19 shot. Does that make sense? You're starving to death and you're giving them, it's just, this is the kind of BS that we deal with, and it's fake altruism.

Starting point is 01:09:58 And the reality, as you're about to see, had nothing to do with helping people. Several hundred farmers were evicted from their land to make way for that 600-acre manufacturing site. Oh, that's the other part, too, is that you had to remove actual farmers. Think about that overlap today. People that actually are helping the local area to build this factory, which later did not help those people.

Starting point is 01:10:18 The plant also began producing clothes for retailers such as Old Navy, Walmart, and Target. And Mr. Clinton declared 100,000 jobs would be created in short order. but the Carcol Industrial Park only created 8,000 jobs. And I'm willing to bet you that they largely did not go to the people around the surrounding area, which is almost always what happens. Now, in addition, Carcol was supposed to include 25,000 homes for Haitian employees. But in the end, the government accountability office reports, only about 6,000 homes were actually built.

Starting point is 01:10:48 And of course... And I remember reading reports about how terrible those were, falling apart. Like, you know, and this is what happens when you don't have people bidding. They just, they don't need to... People don't care. especially when you know that you're working through this broken system where nobody cares because the people above you are the ones breaking the law far more than you are so you cut every possible corner you can the criticism goes deeper than simply not creating jobs south korean textile giant s ae trading co which was the main employer at the facility donated between 50 and a hundred thousand dollars to the clinton foundation right that's pay to play right there so what you need to know is that the failure in haiti as much as some people would like to put it solely on the clinton is not their failure alone. It is the failure of the entire U.S. foreign aid landscape. You see, donor nations and private contractors control the money, and in many cases,

Starting point is 01:11:37 they funnel it to projects and to contractors and to organizations that align with their interests and not the interests of the people in need. Usually at the expense of the people in need. Maybe the best example of how this worked in Haiti was like this. According to the GAO, the cost to build one house in the post-earthquake relief effort, $33,000, because it was paid to outside contractors. That is five times what it costs one nonprofit called Mission of Hope per house using local contractors. That's the whole point right there.

Starting point is 01:12:08 If you wanted to help people, you could help people. You're exploiting their suffering for your benefit. And then, I mean, it's a very, like, you think of it like this. Why wouldn't you just meet your obligations? You're still benefiting. You're still reaping all the profits from doing it and all these different political deals. But even then, they just don't even complete it anyway. Like you promise 100,000 homes and you do six.

Starting point is 01:12:31 You could have done 100,000 homes and wildly profited. The point is it's not even just about profit. It's every possible way these people exploit and steal and murder rape and rob and they never get accountable for it. And it's all documented. You got presidents of the Senate speaking up. You got people dying left and right. Nobody cared because your government is a part of it.

Starting point is 01:12:56 So when the media is outrage that Trump uses words that seem to dismiss the people of Haiti, but expresses virtually no outrage over how the people of Haiti were actually robbed of what was promised them in the aftermath of that devastating earthquake, then you have to question. But their outrage is truly over. How about that? How about you consider that in the concept of Tucker Carlson and the Putin interview, right? Is their outrage seem genuine? Clearly not. I think it's a manufactured entity to get you distracted from, you know,

Starting point is 01:13:26 the real stories happening beneath the big story that Carlson's being censored. That's how that works. Now, back to the point about Haiti, moving forward in the timeline, 2019. And this was Alexander Rubinstein when he was writing for, I think he still does even, mint press news. And we talked about this a lot at the time. Remember this? Haitian authorities arrested Americans, CIA, transporting a cache of weapons amid the uprising.

Starting point is 01:13:57 The point is at this time in 2019, we're getting into the time frame. Actually, hold on before I get there. This was a point where we talked about this numerous times. Here's the images you might remember. These were the Americans that were caught. Remember this? Trying to hide their faces and so on.

Starting point is 01:14:21 They spoke up and they eventually got them taken back to the United States under the argument they were going to be held accountable, but nothing ultimately happened. So Americans were caught trying to bring weapons to their proxy forces to continue to help what they were doing in Haiti. 2019, U.S. aid exposed as regime change ploy. Now, this was where I believe this was the article. This was me covering that. So you watch the show version of this.

Starting point is 01:14:47 I think this is how this always works. And again, just at the same time, 2019, Bolton sides with U.S. puppet government in Haiti. Big surprise. And Wiener out early. That was, as you might expect. What's his name? I forget his first name now. Anyway, he's not important.

Starting point is 01:15:05 2019, U.S. mercenaries caught in Haiti. And I covered this as well on this show. Actually, yeah, this was a show I covered. But the point is the same. Just showing you guys can go back and watch these if you'd like to watch the work we were covering at the time. So at the point, and this is 2021, just to show you that even the corporate media

Starting point is 01:15:20 is acknowledging the obvious history of exploitation. This is 2021. The assassination of the president. It was Moise at the time. there's one that there's overlap to Trump at that point where he's meeting with him has sent the country into shock and turmoil, sparking discussions the international community on how to help bring stability. But Haiti's long history of interventions by foreign powers can't be ignored,

Starting point is 01:15:45 nor can the fact that often they have been made whether or not Haiti itself benefited. I mean, you could read this. The point is just the general sentiment to be aware that we're all, that they're being exploited, we all know it, but we don't really. talk about it because we're not supposed to. So here is Mick Wallace speaking about this in 2022.

Starting point is 01:16:07 So we still haven't even gotten to the current, what's currently happening, but this is all very relevant to the, you know, the escalation of this. And these are just points. There's so much to actually get into about actual, you know, elections manipulated and how,

Starting point is 01:16:20 but the point is to try to bring you rapidly up to where we are now. And the reality is right now, Ariel Henry is a U.S. puppet. I mean, I think this is abundantly clear. There's somebody who has been manipulated into place, and the people, like they have been in multiple examples of the past, are not, are aware of that,

Starting point is 01:16:39 and are now taking advantage of the reality that the U.S. government has spread so thin to potentially take advantage of that. But here's 2022, so two years before this, where he's speaking about the same issue. And the same thing the U.S. government was doing then, they're doing now. thousands of people from Haiti have been protesting against the U.S.

Starting point is 01:17:03 and Starr regime of Ariel Henri. Henri, excuse me. Now, the point is if it was reversed, like in any other situation, Syria or right now with Gaza, protesters are terrorists fighting for destabilization should you not like their cause,

Starting point is 01:17:21 but if you agree with their cause or at least think it'll benefit you as the U.S. government, well, then they're freedom fighters, and we support their cause for democracy and free speech, right? It's just, it's, and the reality being that they've sided with the worst, most vile people you can imagine and acting like they're supporting their free speech, while they have completely ignored people that are truly fighting for independence and against one of their puppets. I mean, it's just constant.

Starting point is 01:17:45 So the point obviously is that they don't have anything sacred. They don't care about what they pretend they're fighting for. They just are fighting for their agendas. And people like Mick have been screaming about this for as long as you can, you know, as long as he's been doing this. Now the puppet leader is calling for foreign military intervention to crush the protest, and the US have been looking for backing at the UN Security Council for saying.

Starting point is 01:18:08 Right, so think about that. So you got Henri, or I said Henry, which looks like Henry, Henri, the president put in place by the United States government, calling on international forces to come in his country and suppress a protest. So it's, it's, same point I just made. that you can just see how clearly it goes whichever way they want it to. If Russia was, you know, suppressing protests, like you know what that would be framed as,

Starting point is 01:18:32 even if you could then later prove hypothetically that they were being pushed to do so by outside forces. Like with China's conversation and the different examples we've shown you of the CIA literally driving these kind of protests. Doesn't mean that there aren't organic parts of the protests, though. Still being manipulated, though. The last thing the people of Haiti need now is another foreign military intervention called in by the despised leader that doesn't even have a proper mandate to govern. The people of 80 had their own solution to the crisis.

Starting point is 01:19:03 It's called the Montana Agreement. A commission was set up in August last year by a wide range of civil society groups and they signed an agreement and it was to be implemented and begun in February. But the US and the UN and others blocked it. The Haitian people, they need a name to foreign interference. They've been interfered with for 200 years. They're not allowed to think independent. The West has destroyed the place.

Starting point is 01:19:32 They've done everything to cripple the place for years. And now, they certainly need an end of foreign interference, not more foreign boots on the ground. We said we were interested in sovereignty when Ukraine was invaded by Russia. Are we not interested in sovereignty when it comes to Haiti? Does that not count because it doesn't suit US imperialism? Exactly. That's exactly the point. Right. So we can literally watch the progression of this, where they will suppress momentum from movements or potential legislation that is actually stemming from what the people provably want and supporting entities that are willing to, you know, allow foreign outsiders to do whatever they want at the expense of the country.

Starting point is 01:20:17 Naming that, you know, capital and whatever they want to frame it as to make it seem like it's some kind of agreed upon outset, outcome. as opposed to exploiting those people. Here, the poll lady pointing out in 2022, October 16th, the U.S. is drafting a U.N. Security Council resolution. So again, the overlap all of this with the absurd hypocrisy of the way they're dealing with what's going on in Israel or Gaza right now. They're drafting a U.N. Security Council resolution, which they haven't done a single time so far what Israel's doing,

Starting point is 01:20:47 to deploy multinational rapid action forces to Haiti, to stop massive protests happening since August. So they're trying to deploy through the UN forces to stop popular protests against their puppet. Haitian demand resignation of the U.S. installed puppet Ariel-on-Ring and a foreign interference and a lack of foreign interference in their elections. Canadian and U.S. war planes had already landed in Haiti when the supposed military aid had even been approved. their aim is to quickly disperse nationwide protests with force and restore democracy with force, which is by the way what they've done in places like Venezuela and blamed on

Starting point is 01:21:35 Maduro or in places like Syria and blamed on Assad or in places like Ukraine and blamed on whoever they wanted to. Every one of these examples, and I mean this guys, have been proven, proven to have been executed by the U.S. government. In the Maidan Square, what was it, the Estonian foreign minister, I believe, spoke on, and so I've played the video for you countless times on the record with Kathy Ashton, saying, well, we know this was conducted by them and nobody thought. And she goes, yeah, yeah. So they know this stuff. In Syria, the exact same point. They blame, they execute their own people, which was proven, and blame it on Assad. That's not to say

Starting point is 01:22:15 that Assad's not capable of something you might think he could do outside of what, you know, that he can't kill somebody. Of course. any president, any government, I believe is capable of many number of things. But that's a proven reality, despite what you may think about him. Or examples like we saw in Venezuela, where they were literally caught red-handed, throwing Maltov cocktails on the very thing they then said Maduro was stopping. And that was another conversation about humanitarian aid. Remember that?

Starting point is 01:22:40 They need the aid. We're sending it. Oops. The truck gets opened and it's a bunch of barbed wire and wood. Oh, you got lying. And they say they just move on from the story. You remember that story where they literally, really had trucks full of barbed wire and they were trying to bomb them with

Starting point is 01:22:53 ball top cocktails. They blamed it on Maduro and it turns out on video they were throwing them from the Guido side. I mean, it's just over and over and over. In this case, they're already deploying military before they even have the illegal approval to do so. Haiti is the first free country in America, she writes, American Hemisphere, which was born out of a slave revolt, excuse me. In 2004, French ambassador admitted on the record that U.S. and France, can't talk right now. And France. And France. France orchestrated a coup against Haiti's elected president, Mr. Aristide. Now, we've talked about this as well.

Starting point is 01:23:29 It's amazing how they can just, in passing, just kind of, you know, wax about how, oh, yeah, you know, we conducted a coup. Sort of like we kind of like distant, oh, yeah, Operation Ajax, we overthrew Iran, but that was a different time. No, it's the same damn stuff happening today. That was illegal then. It's illegal now. I mean, that was 2004.

Starting point is 01:23:47 They did this. They put these people in place. The president, President Aristide was removed illegally because he had dared to ask France to pay reparations for looting Haiti as the price of its freedom in 1804 during its freedom struggle. And now, another interesting point, by the way, is that, you know, just because, like right now, like, for example, we'll get to Congo in a second, Democratic Republic of Congo. Just because somebody might actually be, like, let's say they put somebody in place, like we saw with, what's a good example? Even Guido, even though he didn't come into power. The point is they can be the guy and then rapidly just no longer be what they need anymore and they just drop you like a bad habit.

Starting point is 01:24:29 Or you may do something that they don't want anymore. You may grow out of wanting them to be supporting you anymore. And all of a sudden you start doing things for your benefit and that's not what they want. So you're gone. Right. So the point is that there can be people they put in place that they just outlive their usefulness. So think about like that as well. But it says during its freedom struggle, Haiti was asked for a huge sum of money from French colonizers.

Starting point is 01:24:51 It says ever since 2004 coup, the U.S. and Western allies have been in full control of Haiti. Quote, over the past years we've seen in Canada, the U.S. and France, really taking control of the country, of the political agenda in the country. Right. And it's been chaos ever since. Now, in our Western political sphere, we just point and go, yeah, those bad countries, they can't get their stuff under control. No, you maintain this kind of destabilization. so you can do whatever you want, whenever you want all the time, including completely outsourcing everything, or that's not a right word, you know, just siphoning off everything from this country

Starting point is 01:25:30 for the benefit of your corporate interests and your country itself. It says now with worsening living conditions in Haiti, this is 2022, people have been demanding elections as they are fed up with Western neo-colonialism in the form of a puppet government, which by the way, they continue to, like I think specifically, in both cases we're talking about today, the elections were supposed to come and they just didn't. X number of reasons, but we'll get more in depth in regard to Congo,

Starting point is 01:25:55 but people are upset with that. And there's always some kind of an argument. It says, shameful Western media is brainwashing to support military intervention, occupation of Haiti. They were doing the same thing in 2022. A recent finding has shown that the nation of Haiti have some of the largest undiscovered oil reserves in the world. Surprise, surprise.

Starting point is 01:26:12 Now, it's never just about that, but that does play a factor. They were estimated to be even larger than Venezuela. Now, here's the Washington Post in 2022. The U.S., of course, backs sending international forces to Haiti. Of course they do. Now, this is 2022, October 15. J.P. points out, let's remember that Haitian people have been protesting nonstop at this point in October,

Starting point is 01:26:37 2022, for eight weeks against both the U.N. and U.S. puppet government, and that government's recent removal of fuel subsidies, which increased inflation by 30%. These protests have been hidden as the media, focuses on the gangs, which I think is an obvious part of both sides of the two conversations we're having about these, that they will utilize and even seed the infund and these kind of entities, like the moderate rebel aspect, which then, by the way, could eventually become another entity that could take power should they no longer want this person in control. If that's the way it's working, I mean.

Starting point is 01:27:12 Now, I'm a cloud pointed out again, October 2022, the Washington Post editorial board just called for U.S. military action against Haiti. it literally says, yes, intervene in Haiti and push for democracy. That's absurd. That's the kind of stuff we see today. So violate the democratic process for democracy, right? Isn't that exactly what they say in this country today? We have to suspend democracy to save democracy. And these people are just parodies of themselves.

Starting point is 01:27:41 And again, this meme, open up democracies here. In 2022, we covered this at the time. Haiti regime change, right? And this is where it was upcoming to the next opportunity for them to step in and put their own people in control when they were tired of what was happening. And here's the New York Times in 2022. A failed state in regard to Haiti, an aid trap. The modern world's first nation born of a slave revolt. We just published an investigation, it says, of an overlooked part of the history, examining what might have been if Haiti had not been looted since its birth.

Starting point is 01:28:18 Who do you think is doing that? And this is at a time, you know, 2022. I argued these entities are always using truth in their own benefit at some points in time. Maybe this person thought they were, but they're talking about at least this point that I think is important to this. That the U.S. and foreign Western powers have been looting this country in every way they could since its inception. And then we turn around and act like they can't get their S together. Dan Cohen bringing this into the day, writes, as the U.N. at U.S. Empire over extends itself in Europe, Asian, the Middle East, Haiti is on the brink of a revolution, ready to oust the U.S. back puppet regime of Ariel Henri.

Starting point is 01:28:55 And he cites this article from somebody who I wasn't familiar with, but I'm following now. It's a good article. Haiti on the brink. It says the government of de facto prime minister Ariel Henri is completely illegitimate, ineffective, and unpopular. The U.S. Empire is preoccupied and overextended in contending with crises in Ukraine, Israel, Palestine, and Yemen. Conflict with Iran, Lebanon, or China may erupt at any moment.

Starting point is 01:29:19 But above all, the Haitian masses are fed up, hungry, angry, and ready to begin down the rocky road of revolution all by all indications. In other words, Haiti's subjective conditions are ripe. He says to start with last Friday, January 26th, rather, delivered two huge legal defeats for the U.S. Empire. The first was the ICJ ruling in favor of South Africa's case that Israel was committing genocide with its unrelenting assault on Gaza, which is killed close to 30,000 Palestinians, mostly women and children. Haitians took note that the tide appears to be turning in such international bodies, which Washington has long controlled. We all see this right now.

Starting point is 01:30:01 It says, but the second legal defeat was the ruling by Kenya's high court. And you may not have heard about this, that Kenyan police could not be constitutionally deployed to lead the Washington-devised multi-eastern. national security support mission to Haiti. Endorsed by the UN on October 2nd, 2023, right before October 7th, which is pretty interesting. The point is that they created the multinational security support mission to be able to take Kenya's police, as well as it appears with the Bahamas and other entities involved with what they call the MSS,

Starting point is 01:30:38 to basically essentially invade Haiti and take control of the government yet again. But the point was the big defeat was when the Kenyan police basically said they weren't going to allow that. But they will apparently appeal. Now this was the Kenyan court said they wouldn't allow it. The police wanted this, but the Kenyan president will apparently appeal the ruling. But the point really is that right now, there will not be any Kenyan cops deployed into Haiti anytime soon. But it says after the ruling, the multinational security support mission participant Bahamas also, demobilized with national security minister Wayne Monroe saying that his troops will not be deployed

Starting point is 01:31:21 until the Bahamas government knows exactly what his soldiers would be doing. Now, I argue if there wasn't a kind of dismantling of this because of different mobe, different, you know, like the Kenyan court, the Bahamas wouldn't have had the, I don't know, the courage to do that. Basically, they just stood up and go, well, what do you think they didn't know before? They were a part of this already. It was all going forward. There was no indication that they knew what they'd be doing. All of a sudden, because other parts are pulling back, they spoke up to and they were like, we're not going to do it until we know what's going on, which seems to suggest that they

Starting point is 01:31:54 kind of know. You're using our entities as a battering ram against the people you don't like in Haiti. But it says on Tuesday, January 30th, Henri asked the high counsel for the transition or the HTC for a meeting at noon. The body simply refuses request, which is not a good sign. the high counsel for the transition was apparently something put in place in regard to the transition, which just kind of became the norm, which is, you know, how these things done to work. It says to make matters worse, and again, it's kind of like the de facto ruling body.

Starting point is 01:32:25 But it says to make matters worse, there is a good chance that Guy Filippe, the former, quote, rebel leader and Senator Elect who just spent seven years in U.S. jails will finally arrive in Porta Prince this week, perhaps as early as January 31st. Since his repatriation to Haiti from the United States prisons in November, Philippe, or Felipe, however you say that, has been called for, has been calling for revolution, organizing a militia, exhorting Haitians in rallies around the country on the social media platforms to rise up against, quote, the system and oust Ariel Henri, and to fight against imperialism and the MSS's deployment. in response, and that was again, basically the U.S. driven invasion, essentially, in response, a growing number of demonstrations, strikes, barricades, and civil disobedience actions have gripped Haiti.

Starting point is 01:33:17 Now, this is why I brought this up before. Now, my gut tells me that this is organic, that these are people, and by the way, that never always, it doesn't always mean that it will end up in a positive way. Maybe these people are just as corrupt and, you know, that's, you never know. The point, though, is that this feels like the organic pushback against outside powers controlling what Haiti's always been doing. My concern, though, is that point I made about controlling the loss. This is a guy that just came from seven years in U.S. prisons. God only knows what was done, what the CIA convinced him to do, you know, that kind of point.

Starting point is 01:33:53 Or nothing, or he's here fighting for freedom. But I just worry about that, seeing as how he came right out of these prisons, and suddenly has kind of become a leading factor of this whole thing. which, by the way, was already happening before he got there. See, I mean, I'm just worried that that might be their effort to guide the loss in the way that might still benefit them. Just something to consider. Again, if I were to pick, my gut tells me that this is him fighting against the powers that have kept him in prison for seven years. I just always like to give you the alternative possibilities.

Starting point is 01:34:25 But it says almost the entire political class has fixed February 7th, so yesterday, as the deadline by which Henri must step down, which as far as I can tell, he did not. Because he promised as much when his government launched the HTC on December 21st, 2022. Again, that's again, was the kind of point about where all that effort from the U.S. side culminated. Now almost all of Haiti and its diaspora, including long silent figures like celebrity Wycliffe Jean, are calling on him to resign. On January 23, 2024, just last month, the official government journal, Lee Montefi,

Starting point is 01:35:02 Lantier, I believe, announced the firing of Jean-Tel Joseph as the Environment Ministries National Agency for Protected Area's Director General, who directs the agents of the protected area surveillance brigade, or the BSAP. In recent months, the BSAP has actually grown, and it's not like it sounds, it's actually like a militia group, has grown from a few dozen agents to become a large militia of over 15,000 troops. And according to some estimates, perhaps two or three times that. number. In the Southeast Department alone, there are 20,200 BSAP members, and according to an

Starting point is 01:35:40 unofficial spokesperson. It says the BASAP troops, which in videos can be seen assembling in formations in towns across Haiti, ranging from the cruise ship destination Labadee in the north to the dusty central plateau town of Las Cahobas are not loyal to Ariel's government, but to Jantel Joseph personally, which is interesting. And this was the, again, the person that was fired from the Environmental Ministry, National Agency, protected areas, Director General. But the point is, it's not loyal.

Starting point is 01:36:17 So this massive militia group around the area is not loyal to the U.S. puppet. Not surprising. Now, it says BSAP is still a coherent force under Jontel, according to a source working closely with Joseph, Jontel. Now Joseph Jontel rejects his dismissal in regard to the position he was in saying he was appointed to the post by President Moise and can only be removed by a presidential decree, not that of a de facto prime minister put in place by the U.S. government. I added that last part. Although most of the BSAP troops are unpaid, unarmed and minimally trained, which by the way, to me, is why I think they're not influenced by outside powers or if you believe that's the case.

Starting point is 01:37:01 unpaid unarmed, like so it's an entity that is driven, it would appear to be by national and, you know, patriotic interests. It says they are procuring guns, getting more training and are, and most are glad to volunteer for now, according to sources close to Joseph. He is the nominal head of Guy Filippe's party. And hence, one of Filippe's lieutenants making Filippe VSAP's effective leader. Now, again, we're talking about the guy who was in U.S. jails. who is now kind of this de facto leader of the revolution in some people's eyes. Just again, just concerned about, you know, just keep that thought in mind about where this ends up. But the point is that so this huge militia group now seems to be de facto, like it says,

Starting point is 01:37:45 he's essentially the effective leader of what appears to be the largest force. His plan is to turn BSAP into a well-organized armed force that will subdue the criminal gangs plaguing Haiti, which again, I wonder whether that is being driven by whatever outside force, you might expect to destabilize things in the interest of people wanting whoever they put in power to stop that, sort of like a form of sanctions. Right? That's how that. That'll make that point again when we get to the Congo side of this.

Starting point is 01:38:13 It's what they do. This side of it's just me going, that makes sense. I can't prove that. Reestablishing security in Haiti in 90 days, he says, as his point. And if necessary, to chase Ariel Henri from power in general. On January 29, the government banned BASAP members from carrying arms, wearing uniforms, or circulating in towns, which makes sense, while ordering them to register immediately

Starting point is 01:38:36 at the nearest environmental ministry office. The decree stands absolutely no chance of being respected. But that's obvious to me of a U.S. puppet going, you can't have arms and you have to register because this is the power that threatens them. Belief, the former police chief, is calling on the Haitian National Police rank and file to side with the people's movement

Starting point is 01:38:55 and not combat the BSAP agents. Now, of course, you know what that would be called, that the government supporting the U.S. government, for example, supporting their puppet, are going to call the BSAP terrorist organizations. Mark my words, if this goes that far, that's what will be most likely be deemed. But it goes on to say, I don't say, and this is for a person speaking on the record, Sherylson-Son-Son-San. Actually, I think that's a guy.

Starting point is 01:39:18 I think that's this person here. Yeah, Sherylson-San, is that I don't say that I'm a guy Philippe fanatic, but when your house catches fire and you have to put it out to save your home, your family inside, you will accept help from anybody who brings water. And afterwards, you'll examine his face. Interesting analogy, I think that's, right? The point being that, you know, when you've been, when your country is burning down because of outside influence, anybody that steps up to try to stop that, it's a means to an end.

Starting point is 01:39:50 His point is, this guy seems to have momentum. They're willing to, they can actually push back the U.S. puppet. Well, we'll support him. And then after the fact, we'll go from there. You know, it's like with somebody who is, like, they'll step in and try to criticize how people like this will side with terrorists. His point is, I'm not even sense what's happening, but the analogy being that, like, let's say, Palestinians who are now supporting Hamas, they're going to go, see, they're all terrible terrorist supporters.

Starting point is 01:40:13 Well, at this point in time, it's the point he's making right there. Look, your house is burning down. They're offering you water. You're going to take it because nobody else is trying to help. After the fact, you may stand back and go, okay, well, now things are different. But they'll sure as hell use that to make you look like the bad guy. That's an important. That's an important point. But he goes on to say, I ask all the people who believe in me and know that I'm not corrupt, don't support Guy Filippe, but support the people in this battle because Haiti has to get out of this mess. I support the movement to overturn the system. And that means not just overturning Ariel Henri and all those acolytes. Right. There's something much bigger happening here. I believe this.

Starting point is 01:40:53 And you know, look, there's people in this country that can very much understand what that sentiment was. I worry, though, that if you're doing so through the two-party mindset, that you're going to get trapped. We can't actually have something change in that kind of way in this country without all of Americans on the same side. And I don't mean that in a sense of like 100%. I just mean that it can't be, like, for instance, I understand the mindset of trying to change this system in a wholesale kind of way and that we have the right as Americans to try to accomplish that. But I'm not operating through a two-party mindset. And there are people on both sides of the paradigm who might agree with me. But we won't achieve any real cohesion because they have a fundamentally different understanding

Starting point is 01:41:37 of what that would look like and even where you would start because I argue the two-party paradigm keeps them lost. Either way, it's very simple. They're being exploited. They're trying to, they've have been since their inception and they are trying to fight out from it finally with the opportunity because it's been presented because they're very, everything seems to be changing right now. And don't forget the point they're trying to make it essentially, you know, you can't

Starting point is 01:42:03 have arms, you have to register, we don't want you to be a militia group. Well, it's weird that the same thing is happening in our country right now, preventing private paramilitary activity of 2024. Don't miss these overlaps, guys. We're watching a worldwide shift right now. Doesn't mean it's in the positive. Hopefully we can make it that. I do believe it is, but where it ends up is the real point.

Starting point is 01:42:23 But again, the world. here's Congo in the same conversation the Democratic Republic of Congo right so there's there's two I believe the point I made in this article not to be confused with the Republic of Congo which is it's weird but it's confusing seeing as how they're so close

Starting point is 01:42:42 but DRC the Democratic Republic of Congo is what we're discussing today here's a video from Sima just pointing out that at the national anthem at this at this game this football game or soccer depending on where you are in the world. The team made a big political statement

Starting point is 01:43:01 to try to get people to pay attention to what they're dealing with. I think this was it right here. Or no, I think I just showed it on this. Yeah. Just you can see it. So they all held this for, you know, 30 seconds, which definitely got attention.

Starting point is 01:43:31 People want to know what's going on. What are they doing this for? you know. So let's talk about it. So I wrote this myself in 2016. The Congo uprising and the CIA Stoge. So let's start there. 2016. Twenty-two people were recently killed during a protest in what is absurdly still named the Democratic Republic of Congo. Not to be confused with the Republic of Congo. The name is absurd because the CIA has long since had its planted stooge in the nation's seat of power, as well as having its fingers intricately intertwined

Starting point is 01:44:05 with the political process for decades. Now, what's funny is, people who have never heard this stuff, probably already just going, geez, you know, what country don't you think the U.S. controls? Now, you might have that reflexive mindset because that's how they train you to think.

Starting point is 01:44:20 But you have to realize that this is, it's actually far more reach, far reaching than you may realize. That may be shocking to you to realize just how many entities are basically serve as vassal states to the U.S. Empire, whether that's because they bowed to the interest, the pressure of military force or political influence, or they've literally regime changed them and put somebody in power that's more

Starting point is 01:44:42 amenable to what they want. I mean, again, to overlap it to the larger point of Israel right now, that's what Israel and the United States government and largely the West have done over the years funded the most radical elements of what they claim they're fighting. Why? Because the more moderate elements don't want to bow to their interests. So it's never been about stopping what they are. It's about trying to control what they're doing as a country or rather as a community or whatever, any demer of levels. And if you can't get them to do what you want, well, you find the group that's more amenable to that.

Starting point is 01:45:13 And I'll tell you what, people that will kill for money will do just about anything for money and influence and power. And so they go with that. If you as an American have yet to fully look back through your own history and what we can quite literally prove, even just using their own admissions after the fact, and you can't recognize by now that they have by that matter of policy funded and armed like the worst of the worst while then standing up and pretending they're fighting the worst of the worst. I just don't know how you can rectify those two things.

Starting point is 01:45:47 You're either ignoring their own stated history or you, I don't know, don't care to look at all and just don't want to acknowledge it because it's hard to understand or hard to, I don't know, accept. Because truly, it's public information. I make that point all the time about just like the ones that we all seem to know. Osama bin Laden, Saddam Hussein, the big, big, boogeyman, bad guys that we talk about. Well, both of them were U.S. assets, allies openly, until they weren't. And you can't, you don't think that's interesting?

Starting point is 01:46:21 Doesn't that tell you something? Anyway, the point here is that this is the reality. that's very obvious and provable, even again, based on their own stated admissions going back or people that would write a book as a CIA agent that talks about what they did at that time. It's been publicly acknowledged so many ways around. So yes, the CIA has long had its tentacles wrapped around this country.

Starting point is 01:46:45 As yet, this is old news. It was not until the recent president chose, or I wrote, or was instructed, to disregard the country's constitution, which allows a given president no more than two consecutive terms, and instead opted to forego the next election and just remain on what has now become a dictator's throne. Right. The point is that you just go, well, nah, we don't like that rule, so we'll ignore it. So you have two terms. The Constitution states, you can only have two terms, no matter what. And you don't change that. You just go, nah, I don't like that rule. We won't care about it.

Starting point is 01:47:21 Because you're a dictator. And so this is probably not what the U.S. wanted, because that very clearly shows and demonstrates that you think you're a dictator because you've got U.S. support. Or they said that because they didn't know what else to do, didn't have another option, couldn't find other. Who knows? The point was they just tried to push in a third term with this public U.S. puppet. As of December 19th, again, this is 2016, Joseph Kabula became an ex-president or should

Starting point is 01:47:46 have according to the country's constitution. However, he instead chose not to have elections, just unofficially naming himself president for an unconstitutional third term and likely more to follow. That's what happened. You okay with that? Everybody? I'm the president again. Shut up.

Starting point is 01:48:01 Because democracy. The U.S. didn't care. They didn't scream about it. They didn't go, oh, my God, democracy. You're violating the sacred. Nope, they didn't say a word because they don't care about democracy. They laugh at you when you think they care about democracy. They just care about that, keeping him in the position they want him in as long as you think

Starting point is 01:48:19 they care about democracy. Now, according to local journalists, those killed. in these protests because of this are likely due to government security forces opening fire on those protesters, which, by the way, is exactly what their, their modus operandi. Now, Kabula and his supporters have denied any plan to stay in power, even though that's literally what they are doing, and said elections were simply delayed by logistical problems. Yet, that stands in stark contrast to the majority of reports from the ground. In a recent interview with RT, Kambale, Moose, it was a...

Starting point is 01:48:53 Musabuli, a Congolese journalist and activist, explained why this had come about and how the U.S. is largely responsible. President Kabul, who has caused this crisis in the Congo today, again in 2016, is a product of the United States. The United States actually placed him there, which again is very easy to prove. They supported him in 2001 when he ascended to power as a rebel. then and again, even right there, the point was funding the entities that are more amenable to what you want them to do for whatever money, power, and you use them, you fund them, you drive them, and then you get them in position, the same kind of thing. Then in 2006 and 2011, with the elections in the Congo, the United States, was one of the first countries to recognize Kabul as the president, even though the elections were illegitimate. Again, people screaming about this. And again, the same point that you get from them and in the other country.

Starting point is 01:49:49 They will be the ones screaming that Venezuela, for example, or Bolivia, were illegitimate. And they're the only entity doing so, even though they've got hundreds of international observers, they've got international organizations watching. Nope. They say it doesn't matter. Their puppet organization of American state steps up and says, fake, democracy matters. And then they allow a military junta to take place. but they don't have a problem with that because democracy, right? It's just so transparent.

Starting point is 01:50:21 They didn't speak up because they don't care about any kind of process. Now, it goes on to say Democratic Republic of Congo, Africa's biggest miner of copper and metals used in gadgets like cobalt, today especially we now see why that's so important, has not known a peaceful transition of power since independence from Belgium in 1960. And this is why. The case could be made that the major influence of outside people, powers in the area due largely to its vast resources have made it very difficult for a real

Starting point is 01:50:51 election to take place or some semblance of structure and stability to be maintained. With a country in turmoil or led by a U.S.-backed puppet, those with the power to do so can easily take advantage. And this has been happening for centuries, in a general sense, all over the world. This is also why the story has received almost no major coverage. And still hasn't, by the way. And those who do cover the story, give a vague overview of, you know, yet another African country in chaos, all bad Africa, right? Same they think they do in the Middle East, and fail to include the factors at play that effectively created the chaos to begin with so they could exploit it. Or even that the president is failing to step down. They can't, like the corporate media didn't even acknowledge

Starting point is 01:51:35 that. The only aspect they want the American people to take note of, the same thing. Africa equals chaos. So we have to save them from themselves. All those involved want nothing more than to maintain the wildly profitable status quo where they can do basically anything that is desired with essentially zero consequences as very few are actually paying attention. As always, this is by design. He writes, as all of this is very predictable, he writes, the journalist. We have a president that was imposed on the Congleese people, mainly through U.S. foreign policy, to have a leader that will provide access to Congo's resources. Exactly.

Starting point is 01:52:19 Now, the journalist goes on to say that there are more reasons that Americans should care about what's taking place in the Congo, as there are clear parallels taking place in this is 2016, still today, though, between the two countries and their respective political upheaval. Remember, this is the time around Donald Trump and, you know, it's people, a lot has shifted since then. He also asserts that not only should the American people care for moral and civil, reasons, but due to the fact that what is taking place in the Congo is being funded by U.S. taxpayers. You are funding these regime changes, but most of you know that by now.

Starting point is 01:52:55 This is not hard to imagine knowing the extent to which the U.S. has been, you know, nation building, as they used to call it, both publicly and covertly, for decades. You know why? They don't say that anymore because that's an old trope that we all know what that means. Even saying nation building is now, I mean, that should have always been perceived as a bad thing. That is a violation of their sovereignty. You're doing this without their acknowledgement or interest or desire.

Starting point is 01:53:19 Now it says dating back to 1960 with the help of the CIA, Congo's first prime minister, Patricia, Mercy, Lumba was assassinated. Right? So 1960, they finally, finally get independence from Belgium and they're free. And then the CIA steps in and murders their president. That's how this has always gone. Then for 32 years, there was dictator wars, as they call it. it imposed on the Congo orchestrated by the CIA, right? So you keep this back and forth.

Starting point is 01:53:50 In the meantime, all you're doing is whatever you want. Knowing that Kabula himself was placed in power by the United States, it becomes clear that the U.S. government is deeply tied to this event and that the people are left holding the check. As the story continues to go uncovered by the mainstream media, ask yourself why that is. So in this one example, you can see that a country finally gets its own independence, but a government that has power and interest and designs to take whatever they want, whenever they want, and call it freedom, immediately killed the person that they elected, forced in what they wanted, and have ever since kept this place in absolute devastation. It's what they've done in every one of these locations, and it's about damn time that we acknowledge

Starting point is 01:54:33 that. And it's not just the U.S. It's the West at large, it's the European entities. It's not every single aspect of it, but it's not just the U.S. government. Now, this was our, wrote this in two, excuse me, this was, uh, anti-war, 2019, the U.S. And again, this, I wrote this in 2016. So jump forward to 2019. And again, that, that, what's important to understand is the timeline here. Okay. So we have a, the president, basically this guy, a cabula, forced in a third term. Okay. They weren't, they, they, that, that's what happened. He literally existed in that third term from 2016. all the way until 2018,

Starting point is 01:55:18 which went even further. So it's like, you know, he got his third term plus. And that was a U.S. puppet. Nobody cared about that. Not a peep from the democracy, pro-democracy, corporate media. Nothing.

Starting point is 01:55:31 So go all the way to 2019, January, the new president finally gets squared in. Another U.S. puppet. But this is before, this is first, this is U.S. quietly deploying troops in the mirrors, amid fears of unrest. Now it says while the election in Congo was relatively quiet,

Starting point is 01:55:50 the U.S. is expecting that there will be protests while the results are announced. So another puppets in place, people are outraged because they've never gotten away from this, and so it's the same story. They're deploying their own troops to stop the real popular uprising. The U.S. is expecting that there will be protests.

Starting point is 01:56:11 The anticipation is enough that President Trump part of the same problem, guys, has ordered to send troops to neighboring Gabon. But he didn't start any new wars. He just kept all of them going and started plenty of new things nobody likes to talk about. And is warning the Congolese, not the protest. How dare you? You better not fight for your rights, Donald Trump said. Nancy Pelosi, of course, in line with Trump, because they're totally in agreement on this,

Starting point is 01:56:35 is reporting that the U.S. sent about 80 troops and appropriate combat equipment to the neighboring country to fight. President Trump has said more troops will be deployed. Nancy Pelosi, Donald Trump, high-fiving over their suppression of their rights. The election is between the ruling party's candidate, Shadari, and the opposition candidate, Faiula, which, by the way, neither of them ended up winning, who is backed by the Catholic Church.

Starting point is 01:57:01 The Catholics appear to be anticipating a Faiula win and have even warned of an uprising if an untrue result is released. Now, Shattery is backed by the long-standing dictators, Kabula. So immediately, and of course, this guy's like a pro-exon oil or something like that. Like, it's just so obvious. But he also, he himself accused the Catholics of being irresponsible in their attitude

Starting point is 01:57:28 toward the election. So here is what actually happened. And I find this to be very interesting. So general elections were held. I should just simply put the narrative that what we go forward discussing, this is Wikipedia for here on the podcast. General elections were held in the Democratic Republic of Congo on the 30th of December, 2018 to determine a successor to Kabul.

Starting point is 01:57:52 Right. The illegal puppet, there's been there more than another third term. Like, it's just so ridiculous. But it turns out, Felix, I think it's to Shikidi, this guy here, won, but only with 38.6% of the vote. So plurality. Defeating another opposition candidate, Faiula, and. shattery backed by the ruling party. So you could argue right there that just worked out that way.

Starting point is 01:58:20 But my point is, I'd be willing to bet that the U.S. government backed more than one candidate and drove this as best they could in whatever direction they could. Or it's all completely fake in the first place. But it goes on to say, Faiula alleged that the vote was rigged against him in a deal made with Tashikita. Tashita. an outgoing president, Kabula. So that's very interesting.

Starting point is 01:58:48 So now you've got the, basically the person who didn't seem to be, the only one that did not seem to be, if I've got that, make sure I'm saying that correctly. Yeah. So the Bayula, for all we know, they're all completely controlled, but Bayuta seemed to be the one that was not the one being supported by the U.S. government.

Starting point is 01:59:08 The other two seemed to have obvious ties, but Faiula, after losing, was the one that spoke up and said the vote was rigged against him with a deal made between, Felix, the actual president today, and the other puppet that we can prove was connected to Kabul, saying that they challenged the results in the constitutional court. Now, the country's Roman Catholic Church apparently also spoke up and cast doubt on the result. So you never know.

Starting point is 01:59:36 That could be them saying that because they lost, just like we keep seeing in our country. But I think what's important to recognize is that this, well, let me finish this last part. according to the Constitution, the second and final term of President Kabul expired on December 20th, 2016. General elections were originally scheduled for November 27th, 2016, but were delayed, as I told you with a promise to hold them at the end of 2017, which didn't happen. The promise was subsequently broken. After both international and internal pressure, the elections were finally scheduled for the 2018. They were, however, postponed for a week on December 30th, 2018, due to a

Starting point is 02:00:12 fire in the electoral commission's warehouse. and apparently destroyed 8,000 voting machines. So there's something obviously about this. And I think that my gut tells me that yet another example, just like the other candidates and even the Catholic Church spoke up and said, they found a way to put this person in power. Now, as Herman J. Cohen writes, make sure I didn't, oh yeah, that was it.

Starting point is 02:00:40 He writes, and this is 2019, during Washington meetings with visiting Democratic Republic of Congo, President Felix Tashisi, God, why isn't that so hard to say? let me do this. I'll still probably forget it. Ah, I was saying it totally wrong. Chisaketti. Chisaketti, that's crazy. Very strange.

Starting point is 02:01:09 So, Chisaketti, President Chisichetti, during their meeting, Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, pledged full support to his new government, thereby bringing disputes over his legitimacy to a close. Oh, is that what happened? That's quite the opposite, in my opinion. Chisaketti, being backed by Mike Pompeo, is one more knock, in my opinion, in regard to how obviously that would suggest that they are happy with that outcome. Now, I covered this in 2019. This was the show, Israel bombs Gaza, just to show you that that has been ongoing for a very long time. U.S. troops leaving Syria going to Iraq instead of home, and then U.S. deploys to Congo.

Starting point is 02:01:55 So the U.S. government, again, deploying troops to the Congo for its own benefit. Here is an election result from 2024. So bringing this forward to now. Okay, so we can clearly see that there is some shifty stuff going on. Even the most popular candidate ultimately, basically another entity that was supporting of their interests, which has gone on continued supporting U.S. interests ever since. And Mike Pompeo openly supported seems to have won in an illegitimate way

Starting point is 02:02:22 based on the statements from the ground, journals on the ground, all the way forward to today, 2024. Election results in the Democratic Republic of Congo. This is Matt Miller, of all people. United States, congrats she kacizade, the same person on his reelection to a second term. Okay, wait a minute, though. So we're talking about 2019. Second term?

Starting point is 02:02:48 So you have a, so we're talking about this in 2024. So this was a six-year term or five-year term? I mean, are we doing the same thing again? where we just ignore the fact that they're clearly not following the norm? I mean, the bottom line is, here is the U.S. government again going, yay, this guy is into the election. It just took this long to get done. Like in any other country where they postpone elections,

Starting point is 02:03:13 I mean, that in itself is proof they're illegitimate from the U.S.'s perspective. But they support him. Now, they say, regrettably, noted by domestic and international observation missions, insecurity, logistical issues, and, you know, basically there's issues with the, people are being accused of fraud. and corruption and but we have to look into it. So basically coming out and saying, we support this ruling,

Starting point is 02:03:38 but we call for people to investigate. Now, what do they do elsewhere? What happened to Bolivia when there were simply allegations that later turned out to be nothing but allegations? They called for his to be his removal. They called for him to be put in jail. But of course, we're here. They go, yeah, we like this guy.

Starting point is 02:03:54 So we're going to sit with this until you prove something else. And we'll probably dispute whatever you bring to us. It just shows you that it's a double standard. they want this person in power. Now today, this is what we're getting from the New York Times, December last year, so the end of last year. The overlooked crisis in Congo. We live in war.

Starting point is 02:04:12 Think about how gross it is for them to cover it like this and act like it's some. We never even know. We don't even know this is happening. Your government has been maintaining their destabilization and funding the worst of the worst the entire time. Now, here's what's interesting in February 7th. Both sides of this, talking about the gangs and the groups that are being used, thousands flee in Eastern Democratic Republic of Congo

Starting point is 02:04:31 as this group called the M23 rebels advanced near Goma. So I found this very interesting. Thousands of people fleeing in these clashes between the Congolese army and the M23 group. So at face value with the current president there that seems to be supported by the U.S. government, you might argue the M23 group is fighting against the U.S. back puppet, which maybe that's the case.

Starting point is 02:04:54 But I feel like there's something bigger going on here about whether maybe this guy is not necessarily You know, as I mentioned before, maybe he's no longer what they want. Maybe he's no longer producing what they ultimately want to achieve in the sense of let's look into whether this M23 group might be achieving something different. Now here is the Human Rights Watch from two days ago. Attrocities by Rwanda-backed M23 rebels. Now, it says the Rwanda-backed M-23 armed group has committed summary executions,

Starting point is 02:05:23 forced recruitment of civilians in the DRC. Human Rights Watch reports. The Congolese armies responding to the M23's offensive by equally collaborating with militias with abusive records. So what's interesting to me is no matter which way you look at this, apparently the U.S. government's completely okay working with the very people they pretend that they're always trying to fight. No surprise there.

Starting point is 02:05:44 That's what they do. But it says the warring parties have increasingly appealed to ethnic loyalties, putting civilians in remote areas of North Kivu province at a heightened risk. Now it says, quote, Rwanda backed M23 rebels in North Kivu are leaving behind a growing trail of war crimes against civilians. Rwanda should end its military support for the M23, while Congolese government troops should prioritize protecting civilians and cease using abusive militia of proxy forces. So another way to look at it too is it's possible. This is just an actual dispute between Rwanda and Congo.

Starting point is 02:06:22 and since the U.S. government has a puppet in Congo and openly supports Rwanda, maybe they just don't care. It's showing you yet again that they have no concern for the things they pretend they're fighting for if it contrasts with their interests. You know, human life and human rights and all that. But I think it's more than that. By just simply showing you, which we'll get into is that there's an obvious overlap with Rwanda and the United States. Now, recent investigations by the United Nations group of experts on Congo as well as human rights watch provide significant photographic and other evidence that Rwanda is not only giving logistical support to M23, but that Rwandan troops are actually reinforcing or fighting alongside the armed group inside the Congo, the group that's

Starting point is 02:07:03 committing human rights atrocities. The Rwandan government has denied supporting the M23 rebels. The point, though, Cope is clear is human rights watch found otherwise. Their report and their investigation found that these are in fact atrocities being publicly backed by, or rather just with their actions publicly, backed by. Rwanda. So Dr. Shola Moschong Bamamu writes, Holocaust of, this was on the 20, 20, 23 November, Holocaust of Congolese people, exploiting them for cobalt and copper, which in its own story, is important that that's happening everywhere. We keep showing the lithium mines, the

Starting point is 02:07:40 Kabul and Kong, they're being exploited by the governments acting like they're fighting for some rules-based international order. Thousands of children enslaved to work in the mines, millions killed and displaced, human rights abuses to put profit before people to satisfy the West's tech greed. The UK is complicit in backing Rwanda. Just to show you the overlap to what these, and that it's provable. The UK, the United States, are very clearly backing Rwanda in a general sense and they're mining, using people like this in all the places they are. But does that extend to their support over the groups that are killing people in Congo? Now this is

Starting point is 02:08:18 Congol's bleeding First of all This is a U.S. Embassy post That says The U.S. expressed their unwavering support And their deep condolences to the people of Congo Who are suffering from the violence of the M23 Saying of course

Starting point is 02:08:36 The Director of National of U.S. aid Went to the area to supervise the delivery of tarpaulans In order to provide shelter to these people that are displaced. Now, I don't, I mean, the U.S. aid, in my opinion, the individuals within it very well may think they're doing good and maybe they are, but the actual entity

Starting point is 02:08:55 is not what it appears to be. It is a regime change engine, and it's been openly admitted by people within the group. But he writes, the U.S. government is very cynical. On November 29th, over 100 people were brutally murdered in Kashish by M23 backed by Rwanda. U.S. Embassy, the response?

Starting point is 02:09:17 Let's give the refugees tense and ignore Section 105 of public law 109 to hold Rwanda accountable. Right. So people publicly calling them out for not caring that Rwanda is openly committing atrocities. Now, he also writes, it appears that, and this is in 2024, February, so two days or three days ago. And again, the ambassador writes, given the recent surge and misinformation regarding the U.S. relations with Congo. Isn't that interesting? I want to reiterate that the United States supports a strong, stable, and peaceful Democratic Republic of Congo, and it's, and it's, it is confident that peace can only be achieved if sovereignty and territorial integrity are respected.

Starting point is 02:10:02 You mean like you respect Iraq sovereignty or Afghanistan sovereignty or Venezuela's sovereignty or Bolivia's sovereignty or Gaza or Palestinian sovereignty or on and on and on. You don't respect sovereignty at all. So why would we take that at face value? It goes on to say, we condemn the Rwanda-backed M-23. So here is the U.S. Embassy admitting that Rwanda is, in fact, working with the M-23, which has been under U.S. sanctions since 2013. And we stand with the Congolese people by providing $1 billion per year in programs, support, education, in life-saving human humanitarian aid, they say.

Starting point is 02:10:35 Well, where does it actually go? Now, I'm not going into now, my point would be just like the rest of these conversations. I'm willing to bet you that only a fraction truly gets to people who need it. That being said, knowing it is publicly admitted, it appears that the burning of the U.S. flag in Congo has made the U.S. ambassador worried that Congolese are finally understanding the U.S. destabilizing role in Congo via Rwanda and Uganda. So he's basically calling him out saying they're utilizing Rwanda and Uganda to maintain destabilization in Congo for their own benefit. So they can reap the benefits from the resources and so on. So this is one of the other points about maintaining a sense of constant. constant conflict, so no one's paying attention. You know how valuable it is right now for them to

Starting point is 02:11:20 continue to take the cobalt from these minds? So here's a, here's, he, he points to this documentary. I recommend you watch it. It's only 26 minutes long. It's actually pretty powerful. It's 12 years old. Well, here's a clip that I think is important. Congo is like a nightmare in heaven. It's a heaven because, you know, Congo is the heart of Africa. So much natural resources, the people the animals, the flowers, everything, you know. Congo is heaven, but the thing is that people are living like in hell. People are dying. At first we used to hear one million people die,

Starting point is 02:12:07 two, three, four, fives. And the situation is getting worse, worse and worse, you know, because the money is there, the resources are there in Congo And everybody wants a piece of Congo. Everybody wants a piece of Congo. Why are people living hand to mouth in one of the most mineral-rich countries in the world?

Starting point is 02:12:42 The Congo produces more than a billion dollars of gold alone each year. And the cobalt and the tin and the copper and the tungsten, all of that we're benefiting from, but yet we're silent. When people invade your country, they rape your women, they rape the kids, Hold on. I think I actually put in the full version here. Yeah, I did. Hold on. I mean, really, it's worth watching the whole thing, to be quite honest. It's very powerful.

Starting point is 02:13:15 But I did a clip that I wanted to show you. So because I don't want to play the 26 minute show here. Hold on one second. Let's see. There it is. What? That's very frustrating. Here, I'm going to keep playing it, I guess, while I wait for that.

Starting point is 02:13:42 Let me see if I could find the spot. That's very frustrating. I guess I made a mistake here. I lost this somewhere. Shoot. 106. Let's see. Here, let me do this. Yeah, I've got it for the most part. It's right here.

Starting point is 02:14:18 Why would they be victimized by this? These Hutu were not combatants. They were not people under arms. They were elderly. They were women. They were children. They were sick people. Who were killed in a systematic and highly motivated way.

Starting point is 02:14:37 and the UN knew about it almost in real time. The UN knew, the U.S. government knew, I believe other governments knew as well. They did not make an effort to openly investigate those were not good enough. They allowed investigations to be blocked and they didn't push it. Now, we're talking about the genocide Rwanda, right? That we can, another conversation should be had about how obviously the U.S. government has, you know, as they're pointing out, chose not to do anything as well as the United Nations. for many different reasons that have nothing to do with helping people.

Starting point is 02:15:12 Now, the question can be asked, why was that the case? And of course, part of the difficulty here was that many policymakers felt guilty. They hadn't done enough to stop the Rwandan genocide. And that genocide guilt allowed them to cover this up. That guilt, man. I don't think that's actually the reality, personally. I don't think these, I think these sociopaths don't tend to care. But regardless, there's a reason.

Starting point is 02:15:44 They chose to fixate on the fact because they're human beings and these people have compassion. So they see the same in others, which, you know, which is what most people do, that they cared. You know, we didn't do enough for this genocide. So it caused them to, to want to hell, or rather specifically, ignore what else Rwanda went on to do later. So essentially the point. But personally, I don't think it's about feeling guilty. I think it's about other interests that were involved. Either way, the point is, for whatever reason afterward,

Starting point is 02:16:12 they now, in bringing this to the point today, are allowing Rwanda to essentially carry out these acts without really any consequences. ... manifested in the Clinton era in an extremely pro-Rwanda policy, which essentially allowed the new government in Rwanda to do whatever they wanted, both within their country and within Congo, with impunity. with the leaders of the United States and the United States. So you can see right there you could make the point. I'm not sure if I think this is the case or not that, you know,

Starting point is 02:16:43 maybe this is Rwanda just simply taking advantage of that, of that unfettered, you know, they could do what they want and trying to take what they can from Congo. And now that's the U.S. government just choosing not to care about that. Like maybe making your passive tweet about how you care about it, you know, we've said this and that about it. But if it was Russia doing it, you know the difference how they would respond, right? United Nations looking the other way. Kagami proceeded with a full-scale invasion of Congo with his Ugandan ally, Ueri Museveni. Now, this is not, this is an older coverage, right? This is not today, but the same point can be made.

Starting point is 02:17:15 So the question is, what role did the U.S. play in this? And it was a pretty direct supporting role. Right. I happened to go to Rwanda just before this invasion took place. And, you know, major shipments of weapons were coming in and, you know, and, you know, you know, night to support their war on an army. We had placed people in the country who were training, run an army troops. And in short, we were supporting the invasion. The United States, what they decided... It really shouldn't be that shocking to people. I mean, this stuff is

Starting point is 02:17:52 all but acknowledged in historical context. Why would it be in a different now? I started doing the final analysis, which is supporting invasion of the Congo. In this case, you had Rwanda and Uganda invading their neighbor, plundering it of its natural resource wealth, and suffering no sanctions at the United Nations Security Council. Exactly. And you have to ask why. And it's because they had the very strong support and backing of the United States, United Kingdom, and other governments. Right.

Starting point is 02:18:29 Literally the same thing's happening today. Now, the different dynamic is whether or not there's somebody currently in power that they want, or that's not the case or they're just tired of the I mean you could play out a lot of different possibilities but what we can prove is that they have invested interest in maintaining chaos in these countries for their own benefit and very clearly have a blind spot for allowing Rwanda to do whatever it wants going back to whatever reasoning they didn't do anything about the Rwanda genocide

Starting point is 02:18:57 or in fact drove it for their own purposes right there's a lot of different conversation there but just so we understand this before we get into the the next conversation, excuse me, which we're already two hours, so I'm not sure how much we'll get into, but this is not new. Overthrowing other people's governments, the master list of U.S. regime changes. Yeah, this is, there's a lot of coverage about how obvious this really is, but you can go through this, you know, this is not even a full one, right? This is a condensed list, but just looking at this.

Starting point is 02:19:28 Instances that United States overthrowing, attempting to overthrow a foreign government since the second world war. I mean, these are, it's unparalleled. There is no other country that does this. You know, they point at the other countries and they say they're secretly trying to do it where you can't see. Well, maybe. But even then, that's far less damaging the what you're publicly doing and just calling it freedom. Now, I would also point out, though, I would argue that any government, China, Russia, any of them,

Starting point is 02:19:57 were allowed to get to the point that U.S. is now with the kind of power and clout they perceive at the very least to have, they would be doing the same thing. That's what I believe. Power, absolute, you know, what's the old saying that power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely. This is 2018. U.S. military is all over Africa despite not being war in Africa. It just continues to show you that this is about much, it's cheap control and influence

Starting point is 02:20:24 and taking for their own benefit. 2018, former CIA chief admits that U.S. meddling in foreign elections, quote, is for their own good. I mean, it's just couldn't be more obvious. These are all U.S. article or T-Lab articles. Now, two last points in regard to other current foreign policy discussions. This is from Robert from yesterday. You may have seen this. U.S. drone strike in Baghdad assassinations top Iraqi official.

Starting point is 02:20:51 Now, they killed another official with it, by the way. The point is that this is U.S. government assassination of an Iraqi official under the argument they're responding to Iran, and they call this a deterrent. Like this is a belligerent failing power. You are watching them act irrationally with absolute aggression because that's all they can do right now. I mean, we have to realize that, guys. This is not about America or Americans.

Starting point is 02:21:19 This is a rogue entity that is acting in your name with your money, murdering people all around the world. We can do something about that if we're actually have the courage enough to look beyond the talking heads of the two-party paradigm and stop falling into the same old traps over and over. But my God, this, I mean, it's like, whether it's, I mean, Solomani is a great point, but of course, in the paradigm,

Starting point is 02:21:43 people have decided one narrative or another, you know, there's terrorists or whatever else, which is not true. But in this case, guys, there's just no way around this. They're going to try to make this about Iran. But you have to realize Iran is allowed to be in Iraq. Iran is an ally of Iraq, despite U.S. occupation, which is illegal.

Starting point is 02:21:59 And not only that, what they're actually continuing, to bomb is the pair rather specifically i guess robert was saying the paramilipar popular mobilization forces is the more accurate current term the PMU or units i guess is an older term either way most people kind of know it as the PMU but the popular mobilization forces are part of the Iraqi military and are not Iran as much as they pretend that's the case and they keep this ongoing back and forth and they're just straight up murdering people in a country that they're literally occupying, which makes it just as illegal as what Israel is doing to Gaza. I just can't get past this, guys. This is

Starting point is 02:22:40 blatant illegality. This is rampant lawlessness. And they literally call this defending yourself. It's disgusting. Now, Iran spoke up condemning U.S. attacks on Iraq and Syria, quote, persistent violations of international law, which, by the way, they are. It doesn't matter what your opinion is or whether you believe you're bombing Iran, it's still a violation of law. You're not at war with, I mean, and again, you're occupying this country. There's legalities around that through international law that don't change because you just don't like someone who's there. Complicity in Israel's genocide and overall destabilizing role in Middle East.

Starting point is 02:23:20 They say, quote, and it's seven minutes, I won't play the whole thing, you can listen to it. It is evident to anyone that the root causes of this current situation in the region are occupation, aggression, and the continued genocide and horrific atrocities committed by the Israeli regime and fully supported by the U.S. against innocent Palestinians. Now, again, the idea of occupation, this is very uncomfortable for them. They've had control over this conversation so long because of Israel's belligerence. Everybody now is very aware of this conversation and going, oh, you mean that they're illegally occupying Syria?

Starting point is 02:23:52 They're illegally occupying Iraq. That changes how they're supposed to. Yeah. Same thing with Gaza. Same point. And no matter how much they flail about and scream and call you racist, it's just not working anymore. Good. It goes on to say the U.S. must end its obstruction of the U.N. Security Council and allow the adoption of the draft resolution proposed by Algeria focusing on the ceasefire in Gaza.

Starting point is 02:24:18 Oh yeah, and I'm glad I did this so I wouldn't forget in Robert's article. What's crazy to me, the same time. So they bomb an Iraqi top official, right? And at the same time, as you're right, so yet within the U.S. when the U.S. government launched this massive campaign of airstrikes on Iraq and Syria, guess what also happened? ISIS suddenly emerged and started bombing the same time against the same people.

Starting point is 02:24:47 You don't say. How shocking or not at all when you realize that that's what always happens. As I said here, back on January 7th. ISIS claims responsibility for an attack against Iran, which doesn't really make much sense when you think about the current narratives. And I said, how many times exactly do we need to see ISIS, whatever you think it actually is, attack the enemies of Israel at the peak of hostile rhetoric? Before we truly understand what we're seeing, same point here. If we're watching the U.S. government suddenly bomb Iraq and Syria and then at the same time, ISIS steps up and bombs the PMF in Iraq, we need to go, oh, okay, they're the same thing.

Starting point is 02:25:31 I mean, it's pretty damn simple. People are just afraid to point out the obvious because, oh, conspiracy theory, one of the most successful things they've ever done, scaring people away from a term, it doesn't even make sense when you break it down. But the reality is, as this person points out, and this is on C-SPAN, Israeli secret intelligence service. That's ISIS for you right there. But it's a combination of these two groups.

Starting point is 02:25:54 Very, very, very, very, very, very, very clear. Now, on top of all of that, Arnodotrand writes, so the U.S. government, on top of everything, it's happening, too, but the destabilization in the Middle East, I mean, in, they're talking about, like, it's just, it's, it's, it's almost as if you could sit down and go, what would cause the most problems right now? What would cause the most chaos and the most provoked, what's the most provocative thing we can do and call it deterrence, right? The U.S. decides to place U.S. Army special forces, now, of all times, on a long-term basis. Right, literally a hundred, a few hundred feet away from the Chinese mainland.

Starting point is 02:26:31 Think about that. The Matsu Islands. And then gaslight the whole world by, quote, cautioning China against changing the status quo on Taiwan, which is vital to maintaining peace, they say. I mean, it's like, again, the best point to make is what person said here. This was, Taiwan defense says, U.S. Army, special forces will be stationed with the repostion. Republic of China's armies, 101st amphibious reconnaissance battalion on a long-term basis on these islands. And they go, in that case, I'm sure U.S. won't mind if a small Chinese army base two kilometers off the coast of New York.

Starting point is 02:27:12 Why is that different? It's not. The point is to show you, one, the seeming patience, almost never-ending of these entities that allow this, or really just the awareness that if they act, it'll be not in their interest, because they'll turn that into their aggrandance. as opposed to, you know, that's how funny this is. So the U.S. can do stuff like this, and if they respond, it's their aggression. The reverse happens, we're defending ourselves. Right.

Starting point is 02:27:36 Like it doesn't matter what context or how these things line up. If they fight, we're defending. If we attack, we're defending. If we, you know, it doesn't matter what you do, you're always on the defense. Even when they have every reason to actually defend themselves, their aggression. This is the perfect analogy. I'm not touching you. It's the same thing I say about your, you know, stop hitting yourself.

Starting point is 02:27:56 It's the same thing. They're literally creating the provocation by putting their troops on the border, essentially, and then acting like anything to do anywhere else. And then we say they're the ones creating destabilization. They're the ones doing what? Show me an example of that. Unreal. Now, let's get into, I don't know how much we'll get into today ultimately. That's why I didn't put too much in the title today, but we'll go rapidly through the points I think are important.

Starting point is 02:28:26 or not. Well, you know, we're two and a half. We'll see, we'll see where we go. So first of all, another great article from Robert. Hamas has already defeated Israel, but neither the U.S. nor Israel can admit it. Now, you don't have to take that as like, parade. The point is simply a static, obvious reality, right? If you understand what they're pretending is happening versus what's being proven based on breakdowns and videos and released information, which of course can be altered and can be selectively put out, but the point is you're getting near zero coming from the Israeli side. But, you know, screaming about how many Hamas members we've killed

Starting point is 02:29:01 and you could basically prove that at best they're guessing. And on top of that, even from the Israeli media side, all the different tanks that have been exploded, ultimately, even if their numbers are correct, the point is that what they've done is essentially carry out a massive defeat both in a public relations sense, but also on the ground, especially when you think about this in the larger Middle East dynamic. that's a great article you should read

Starting point is 02:29:26 Robert's really been knocking out of the park and that we included a bunch of important points in all of this to overlap this with the different conversations, occupation and so on. It's a great article. But I found this to be really interesting. So the point here is that they're failing right now and they're all flailing about, right? They're trying to maintain their alliances

Starting point is 02:29:44 but at the same time like from the US perspective they're like, okay, we can't just keep blindly doing this because we're losing everything. We have to make, like, and that's my opinion, obviously, but I think that's what's happening, both from a media sense. They see the writing on the wall. They see that every single one of the people that support them, like in a public sense, the average people are screaming how wrong they are.

Starting point is 02:30:05 So they have to slowly pull this in while maintaining their influences, their access journalism. But it's coming down on them now. Netanyahu, not a trustworthy leader, says Hillary Clinton, U.S. brothers detained by Israeli forces in Gaza. That's interesting. I didn't even see that. I just used this for the headlines. I wanted to get into this Times of Israel article.

Starting point is 02:30:32 U.S. brothers detained by Israeli forces. That's actually really interesting because I was going to get into a story today. I'm going to wait for probably until the next show about a woman from, or it's basically the family of a New Orleans grandmother says that she was kidnapped by the IDF in Palestine. So she lives in Palestine, but she has got family in New Orleans who's saying that she was randomly kidnapped, which by the way, not surprising, seeing as how they're just kidnapping anybody all the time who is just Palestinian. But we'll come back to that. Hillary Clinton, Netanyahu's got to go. Now, what does this show you?

Starting point is 02:31:09 No, it does not mean. This is actually a perfect analogy about the media point. Does this mean suddenly we trust Hillary Clinton? Obviously not. It means that she is aware that everything, that. They've lost control. So she's an opportunist. She's going to step up and try to take the stand.

Starting point is 02:31:26 Oh, well, I'm on the side of the truth because we see that Netanyahu. Well, it's not about Netanyahu. It's about the Zionist government. And far, far, far more than just Netanyahu. So this is about them doing two things in my opinion from a personal perspective, Clinton trying to frame herself as being on the right side of the conversation, which is going to benefit her if she can work that out. I don't know why anybody to believe her at this point,

Starting point is 02:31:47 but secondarily for the larger agenda. If you can convince people that it's just Netanyahu. Yahoo, well, you can get him out of the way and keep moving. Hopefully regain your footing. That probably won't happen, but that's what I think this is really about. But isn't it crazy to see somebody like Clinton, of all people, step up and go, I mean, it's really interesting to see Netanyahu in a position like this where he's standing up acting like everybody in the world supports him.

Starting point is 02:32:12 If you don't, you're a racist who hates Jews, and Clinton stands up and goes, you're terrible, get out of the way. So does that mean that she hates Jews? Does that mean that she's a racist? I guarantee they won't make that argument. But what's funny is you can go anywhere else and people who are just going, maybe Netanyahu should tone it down. They're like, you racist, you hate you.

Starting point is 02:32:31 Not to her. When she went as far as to say, you've got to get out of the way, you're not trustworthy. I just find that. But this is a sign of what's going on. It's the writing on the wall. They have lost control of the narrative. They've lost what they're doing. They are just maximizing the suffering and the pain and the death for any number of reasons.

Starting point is 02:32:51 reasons. Petty reasons just to punish the people who won, or in hopes that maybe you can drive this another direction. Either way, that's what they're doing. And your government is passively, if not actively, allowing that to continue. Death, suffering, murder, genocide, while screaming, we're fighting for freedom in human life. But here's, there's plenty of these examples. So Clinton, of all people, is just kind of mind-blowing to see, right? This is arson, Ostrovsky. You know, there's a lot of these entities that have kind of become common features of the Zionist propaganda. I mean, very proud Zionist. America, first of all, we'll start with Blinken, because this is where the stems from.

Starting point is 02:33:35 Blinken says, Israelis were dehumanized in the most horrific way on October 7th. Well, I don't see how terrible things happened. People died. Right? They invaded, by the way, which was legally protected under international law, because it is, the act of armed resistance as an occupied entity per the fourth Geneva Convention is legal. But crimes after that are not. But if you can't distinguish those two things, you're being dishonest.

Starting point is 02:34:02 But nonetheless, even if you argue everything they said is true, where's the dehumanizing? The only way that comes into play, well, I take back the everything is true. That only comes to play if you pretend all of their atrocity propaganda was true. But it wasn't. Seemingly everybody honest could admit that, including almost all of Israeli media. at this point. But so to start out saying they were dehumanized is just about wading the scales because your next sentence is, but that cannot be a license to dehumanize others, but you can't even have the courage to say Palestinians, right? But that's not okay. That went way too far.

Starting point is 02:34:39 This is my point. So Blinken, of all people, who is blindly supporting Israel, going so far as to gaslight, the genocide's not real, you guys are lying about that. But he steps up and simply says, you know, Aven starts by saying they were the ones that got her dehumanized but but but you can't do it to other people though

Starting point is 02:34:57 and that to them is way too far a wild supporter of Israel barely, barely steps a toe over the line and America is always and shall be our greatest friend but sick and tired

Starting point is 02:35:10 of this kind of lecturing and virtue signaling even come, that's what happens even at this point this person responds oh they're so pro-Palestinian the Biden administration?

Starting point is 02:35:21 I mean, this is a group who has allowed genocide, who was gasoline the entire time has dragged their feet for four plus months to allow it. And the moment they go, maybe you shouldn't dehumanize other people. Oh, you love Palestine. It's like, that's the level of the mainstream conversation.

Starting point is 02:35:38 Lockstep, lockstep, lockstep. And then, you know, I don't know, but they're people too. Oh, you hate Jews. Like what the hell? It's so unnerving to see. And some people truly believe that. So my point again goes back to Clinton of all people saying you're not trustworthy, not a peep.

Starting point is 02:35:57 Blinken simply tries to equivocate in some way and they attack him. But there's more than that. Here's what he says. And this is the pro-Palestinian administration that she was claiming. He goes, in my seventh trip to Israel since October 7th, his seventh trip. Think about that. There's all sorts of genus, the world, all these things happen in the world. seventh trip in the last four months,

Starting point is 02:36:21 I met with officials in Jerusalem and Tel Aviv to discuss the latest on the ground. My travels in recent meetings this week with regular leader, meeting with all the leaders. Far too many lives have been lost, he says. Hostages are still being kept from their families. Yeah, because they refuse to take them back. Civilians continue to suffer as a result of the conflict.

Starting point is 02:36:38 We must continue working towards a solution. He just can't even say the word Palestinian. And even that, again, is my point. That's too much. They'll attack him for suggesting, even broadly that they might be not doing enough to stop killing people. He finally says at the end, the U.S. is committed to forging lasting peace and security in the region and is an Israel that is integrated into the region and an independent Palestinian state.

Starting point is 02:37:03 By the way, which every single level of their government has said will never, ever, ever happen. And yet they act like this is in the process. So it shows you that they know that. They know it won't happen. They want you to think that that's what might happen. So you just kind of meekly go along with whatever they say. It was just around the corner. They've been saying that for 75 years.

Starting point is 02:37:25 Well, more so 40-something years. The point is he knows that's not going to happen. I don't even think he wants that. He knows that by maintaining the illusion of the state, that they can pretend that Israel might actually not be just murdering people to murder people. And again, as always, to include the point that even Horatts made it public, that they, while pretending wanted a two-state solution, We're actively funding the group who actually invaded October 7.

Starting point is 02:37:51 Hamas. Anyone who wants to thwart an establishment of a Palestinian state has to support bolstering Hamas and transferring money to Hamas. This is part of our strategy. Harat's, the leading Israeli platform put that out two days after October 7. Because that makes sense, right? It does when you realize that they are not honest. The Israeli government was actively keeping the group

Starting point is 02:38:14 that they pretended they were fighting strong so they could pretend that was why, because of Palestinians, of course, that they didn't allow a two-state solution. We're trying to give it to them, but they keep picking Hamas. All the Eli Davids and NMizigs and all of them out there, that's what they keep saying. You elected them, and you did it. It's why we give you all the money and you give it to terrorists. No, you ridiculous person, your own government was doing that. But here's also what he said.

Starting point is 02:38:44 Remember, the pro-Palestinian, Blinkin, so we're told from the rabid Zionists, the families in Gaza whose survival depends on the deliveries of aid from Israel are just like our families. They are mothers and fathers and sons and daughters who want to earn a decent living. Send their kids to school and have a normal life. We must not lose sight of that. You'd imagine something like that would be like, well, yeah, that's like saying the sky is blue. These are human beings that have lives and families. But you can't say that. You can't pretend that you can't humanize them. Well, Israel's actively trying to dehumanize them. That makes you a bad guy, right? The point is he got attacked for that. Countless peep Zionists going,

Starting point is 02:39:17 how dare you support Hamas and whatever else? My point was, well, you were four months and an entire genocide that you're legally complicit in too late. This is just insulting at this point, especially as you continue to unconditionally arm Israel while saying that. There's the link showing you Israel,

Starting point is 02:39:35 you is the most destructive bombs in areas designated as safe. Imagine standing up and acting like you care about their families and their futures and their dreams, while then giving 2,000-pound dumb bombs to Israel, knowing where they're going, because your people are on the ground.

Starting point is 02:39:50 Axios wrote an entire article about the three-star general that was helping designate bombing locations. You guys are lost. We see you. Michael Oren writes, here's my point. When Secretary of State Blinken accuses Israel inaccurately,

Starting point is 02:40:07 unfairly, and libelously, you might as well have said, blood libel, of dehumanizing Palestinians. Is that what he said? He dehumanizes us and contributes to the delegitimate of Israel and the demonization of Jews worldwide. Wow. Okay. So he says, Israelis were dehumanized in the most horrific way. Then just simply says, but that can't be a

Starting point is 02:40:33 license to dehumanize others. He did not even explicitly say you did it here and there. He just said, but you can't do that. Which, by the way, we would all go, yeah, obviously. That's a static reality, but not from Israel's perspective. How dare you state the law that we that we pretend we're following. How dare you? You hate Jews. I told you. That's literally, I can't believe how ridiculous this has gotten. That's about as ridiculous as Majorcas, pretending that because he's got a family of a Holocaust survivor, that you're not allowed to call out how bad he is in his job. It's absolutely mind-blowing to me. Blinken has been one of the obvious champions of Israel, blindly gaslighting pro-genocide, and he simply ignited.

Starting point is 02:41:17 that you can't dehumanize people, and they basically insinuate that he attacked them. He libeled Israel. He dehumanized them, delegitimize them, and demonize Jews around the world. How exactly does that even dehumanize? I mean, it's just, it's what you do. If you're a gaslighter for genocide, those are your talking points. He goes, thank you, Blinken, for resupplying us with ammunition and standing up for our right to self-defense. See?

Starting point is 02:41:46 But without legitimacy, we will be hard pressed to use. the ammo or excuse that right or exercise that right what dehumanizing us in dangers our security and possibly our existence so i just i it's a cartoon am i crazy like this is absolutely this we should be making fun of this a guy who's literally arming you to murder them blindly supporting you because he does not toe the line exactly is suddenly demonizing jews around the world i mean that That's comical, guys, that's ridiculous. Same point here to a degree where she had to leave. I don't mean, just so it's obviously always clear, especially to new people, I don't support

Starting point is 02:42:31 literally anybody in Congress. I don't support government anywhere, ever. I mean, I shouldn't say ever. I mean, there's points where I end up supporting, you know, like, I'd like, for instance, I would like to believe in somebody, right? And I have in the past, we're like, you know, Tulsi Gabbard came around. I'm like, well, I hope, I hope she looks good, but then immediately, nope, there it is, not real.

Starting point is 02:42:48 RFK, I hope, I hope. There's, there you go. Sports Israel. Support blindly supports genocide. Anyway, my point is, I don't support any of them. She says, if you don't support Netanyahu, if you are disgusted by the countless lifeless children being pulled out of the rubble, all of which is easily proven.

Starting point is 02:43:04 If you actually believe in upholding human rights international law, she says, vote no on a blank check to Netanyahu's genocide, which was a bill in regard to giving them $14 billion, I think, in funding. While being legitimately accused of genocide, through the world court. I mean, it's just staggering. Here's what do they say. Same guy, Arson Autrovsky.

Starting point is 02:43:25 I am disgusted by your unhinged Jew hatred and support for Hamas. Huh? Where is that in there? You don't support it. Okay, don't support Netanyahu. Okay, so you're apparently not allowed to not support an Israeli leader, okay? Or ruler, rather. Disgusted by dead children.

Starting point is 02:43:45 Okay, so I guess being disgusted by dead children makes you, hating Jews. If you actually believe in rights, okay, so I guess if you believe in human rights, you hate Jews, vote no on the blank check. Okay, explain to me where any of that makes sense, or is this guy just like, does he have a stroke or something? I mean, I'm obviously being facetious. That's just what keeps happening. If you resist what they're doing, you wink, wink, secretly hate Jewish people and you're a racist and, you know, whatever else we can log on to that, just all the talking points. That's what's happening. And it is painful to watch. Here is a brief moment of honesty, I think, where he probably didn't, his usual think, this will end up going anywhere.

Starting point is 02:44:25 This is Michael Collins, Georgia representative, who when asked point blank, or rather just she states, as a Palestinian, I am offended by, as a Palestinian, I'm offended by Israel killing my people. That's what she said. He responds by saying, as an American, I am not. And it's not an accident. That's what he says. There's I'm offended by that. Israel's killing my people.

Starting point is 02:44:57 As an American, you're not. Why is that? Because this is a war among their country. Because I have an opinion too. I'm allowed an opinion. There it is. So just to be clear, it wasn't Hamas.

Starting point is 02:45:10 It was my people. So Palestinians, I'm offended by Israel killing my people. As an American in government, I am not. Oh, so you mean the government of the rules-based international order or the government that's always professing

Starting point is 02:45:22 to fight for human life and human rights and freedom. But as an American, you are not offended by the killing of Palestinians. It's just the point is this is what, again, I generally tend to think these people and these positions are not that smart or well-informed. They are followers of politics. They are manipulators of your opinion.

Starting point is 02:45:42 They do it for their own petty interests. And then they are manipulated by people above them. That's how I genuinely look at most of it. Sometimes there's little differences here and there, my opinion. But by him saying this, I think is completely self-interest. I think that's just him responding because he thinks that's what you're supposed to be saying right now. Right? Like, Palestinians are bad.

Starting point is 02:46:00 We're supposed to support Israel. But just realize, guys, it's on the surface. They do not care. Palestinians are being executed in real time. Genocide is taking place in front of us. And everybody that has any legal standing has been screaming about it. and apparently our politicians are proudly standing by it. It's crazy. It's upsetting.

Starting point is 02:46:26 Now here to end on this segment, Dave Freeman points out, unless you fired him and all his staff, you ain't reforming the Palestinian Authority. Why are you prostrating yourself before a Holocaust denier who pays terrorists to kill Jews, which is a lie? Roberts broken it down. It's a manipulation of the reality. There's funding that goes to people that die,

Starting point is 02:46:49 whether killed by Israelis in the street or acting in some act of war. So it's regardless. And he made this very clear. The point is it goes to family members of Palestinians who die. So if Israel executes them in the middle of the street, they give the family money to be able to continue living. So to conflate that with giving, the point is that there's a Palestinian who might act and kill somebody,

Starting point is 02:47:13 that that's the same concept. but the reality is that it's simply going to any Palestinian. By the way, most of which are simply killed by Israel for no reason. So it's a lie. They know it's a lie. They're repackaging the reality to sell you on something they want you to think. But his point is, this is beneath the dignity of the United States. Okay, well, then explain for me who they're supposed to be engaging with David.

Starting point is 02:47:33 You're the one telling us that Hamas is the bad guy that we're supposed to be stopping, right? The U.S. keeps pointing at the PA like they're going to be the one that takes power. Israel denies that. And on top of it, the PA is the way. not in my opinion, rather specifically, Abbas is not in the interest of Palestinians. I believe he's acting largely in the interest of the Israelis. Most Palestinians think that.

Starting point is 02:47:55 But the PA, you could argue, might be something. Bottom line is Israel keeps making it clear, and the Zionists like David that support them that there is no option. They don't have a plan. They're just executing, annihilating, destabilizing, destroying genocide. That's what's happening. So who's going to think?

Starting point is 02:48:15 power. The point is they will because they never intended for anybody in Palestine to have any control over the outcome. So Blinken supports their genocide, arms what they're doing, and if you suggest for a brief moment that people matter other than Israelis, you're a terrorist and you support bad guys, or you hate Jews, or you wink, wink, we suggest that. Well, then, okay, fine. Then you go over and you shake the hand of the Palestinian Authority who otherwise is regarded as some entity they're supposed to deal with, and they attack him for that too. It just shows you that they're, the only thing that Zionists right now are actively supporting is their lockstep agenda.

Starting point is 02:48:54 And the people like this that are still blindly supporting it, to the tune of actually arming the things they're doing are actively attacked if they do the smallest thing out of line. So I believe it's quite strongly that we're seeing across the board, the corporate media, and even politicians slowly starting to change their narratives because it's just what else are you going to do at this point? You can't just keep going on. It can't be seven, eight months of genocide. People will overthrow your governments at that point. I mean, that's what they believe. And probably the truth. At some point, there is a breaking point. So what we're seeing is people

Starting point is 02:49:30 like Hillary Clinton start going, okay, we acknowledge that this isn't going to be solved. We have to take action and we have to get ahead of this because we've lost everything because of it. Thank you, Israel's Zionist government for belligerently acting in your own interest at the expense of everything they built, which is a good thing, by the way, what they built was controlling your life and destroying things.

Starting point is 02:49:50 But I think it's important to recognize that. Here's a great clip of exactly that point. I don't trust Morgan, Pierce Morgan, I mean, I trust him less than most anybody, quite frankly, because of a lot of different reasons. But nonetheless, here he is coming out, looking like somebody who's beginning to ask real questions.

Starting point is 02:50:06 And again, because of that contrast, makes the Zionist official here look like they should look, belligerent, aggressive, confrontational, and losing. I think Israel had a right to defend itself, a duty to defend itself. But we now have, as we've heard, I think it's 12,000 children believed to have been killed, another 20,000. Note, by the way, that she shook her head right there. So this is what's clear. She's the Israeli official, or rather the representative for Israel, this. case, she happily acknowledged. Yep, 12,000. That's acceptable, apparently.

Starting point is 02:50:46 Also have been orphaned. Two-thirds of Gaza's been flattened. And here, Benjamin Knighton Yahoo says after four months... And she shook her head right there too. Yep, flattened. Uh-huh. Like, it's almost like you can see, that's my personal opinion, but there's a level, like, that's why they're cheering when they're blowing these buildings up and go, yay, they'll have nowhere to come back to. We just showed you that yesterday. They're proudly, proudly acting in genocide. And there's a level of inherent hatred for Palestinians that comes because that's what the Israeli government has seeded into their minds, their entire lives. So when she's shaking her head, I think it's like, yep, we support that. Watch.

Starting point is 02:51:25 20,000 or so have been orphaned. Children believe to have been killed. Another 20,000 or so have been orphaned. Two-thirds of Gaza's been flattened. And here Benjamin Knight Njahou says after four months, well, we're nowhere near finished. There's months more of this. We will continue until the last mass terrorist is gone. Okay, but that may mean the entire Gaza Strip is gone. Destroyed. Yeah, way to get on board, Pierce. Took you four months to realize the blatant obvious slapping you in the face.

Starting point is 02:51:55 Well, hang on. It may mean the number of children killed doubles to 20,000, maybe 30,000. At what point does this become even to people who support? or Israel implacably about this, because it become just utterly disproportionate. After the first day, Pierce Morgan, like the basic reality of the way they were conducting this was immediately illegal.

Starting point is 02:52:18 The idea that collective punishment was being deployed because of X, Y, and Z made it immediately illegal. There is no legal justification to circumvent international law. There are different settings that change it, but they have committed to collective punishment from the very beginning and every international group and human rights group and they've all been saying the same.

Starting point is 02:52:42 That's what I get clear. That's why I do not. I do not believe this. I mean, I don't think I don't want to pretend. I hate to say. I don't want to give him a compliment. I'm not trying to say Pierce Morgan is smart.

Starting point is 02:52:52 But I will tell you that he's not stupid. And I think it's very obvious that he is able to discern the obvious thing in front of you. So I think this is just self-interest, him acting like this now. Well, I think proportionality. isn't the actual question here. There's a very easy way to end this war, and that is to return all of the hostages

Starting point is 02:53:12 and to surrender unconditionally. That is what Hamas should be doing. That is where the focus is in the pressure. Sorry, I'm going to stop it a few times in this. But, okay, so here's the interesting point here. I've been saying this the whole time. When they say that, they say, Hamas should surrender. Okay, Hamas, please surrender.

Starting point is 02:53:30 Okay, they didn't do it. Okay, now what? Right, like, that's where we need to be. Like, okay, so we hear you saying that. we all call for Hamas to surrender. They didn't do it. Okay, so now what's the plan? Like, you don't just get to keep saying,

Starting point is 02:53:43 that's what we all want, and then if we don't, in the meantime, we'll just keep murdering everybody. They didn't do it. No one else has some kind of influence over them. You're the one telling us they're a rogue terrorist group. So when they don't surrender, what now? You see, the point is they've manufactured

Starting point is 02:54:00 this weird little situation where they can keep saying that, and in the meantime, keep killing everybody, acting like we're the ones not making that happen. It's completely dishonest. They must know that. There's a very easy way to end this war, and that is to return all of the hostages and to surrender unconditionally.

Starting point is 02:54:19 That is what Hamas should be doing. That is where the focus of the pressure of the international community. Hang on, but, Emily, that would not. That would know. Benjamin Netanyahu, now hang on. Benjamin Netanyahu stated unequivocally, this goes on until Hamas are finished, all of them. That means another 20,000 people have to be killed, right, who are just the terrorists.

Starting point is 02:54:40 No. So he's not going to stop. So his point is obvious and she doesn't want to hear it, which is that, okay, so they surrender, which doesn't mean they'll walk up and get arrested. They give the hostages back, right, and they stand down. Pierce Morgan's point is, well, okay, then Israel still has to go in there and kill the 20,000 people. By the way, which also includes the select group of leaders that are being safely kept in Qatar, that Israel doesn't seem to care about, which nobody talks about that. So I don't see how exactly you think you're going to remove Hamas while you've got all the leadership, which by the way, we just showed you they've been funding, which is why they're billionaires in Qatar, which by the way, Cutter is part of the

Starting point is 02:55:17 mediation group. So I can't see how we don't recognize that they're literally keeping their controlled assets safe over here while killing all the Hamas members that might actually be fighting for Palestine. Either way, you have to go after them. So there's a guarantee even after that action that there's going to be more killing. right it frustrates me that i have to agree with pierce morgan i'm kind of kidding but either way he's absolutely right but they don't want she doesn't want to hear it and she goes right back into the cycle once they surrender it's all over it's not based in reality necessarily the hostages got released tomorrow i said netting yahu emily let me finish let me finish my question of

Starting point is 02:55:54 humas i don't think promise that any intention even if the hostages get returned tomorrow of letting 20 000 harass terrorists remain in power in gaza He's going to continue. But that's, I already said that. I said the release of hostages and the unconditional surrender of Hamas. Hamas cannot remain in power in the Gaza Strip and restore, have Israel restore a sense of security. Those two things cannot coexist. That is why Nathaniel, who said we will not accept any term in which Hamas stays in power.

Starting point is 02:56:23 Okay, so right there, exactly. As much as they keep trying to pretend, there's been from the very first week, according to BBC, and I believe it was Associated Press. from the first week, Hamas has offered a full exchange, which again was the real, that was the point the whole time. They argued the reason they did most of this was to be able to get their hostages back, 10,000 of them. But they wanted a full exchange, a complete, an aid to be brought in, and a complete ceasefire.

Starting point is 02:56:50 Israel doesn't want any of that. So regardless of what you think is most important, maybe you don't agree with that. Maybe you think they should think about it. The point is the same. You can't deny that the war, or rather the agenda to take out Hamas, Even if you think that then translates to more safety in the future is more important than the immediate saving of the people they're wanting to take home because they keep pretending that's their primary objective.

Starting point is 02:57:13 We're here to save the hostages. All the families say that's what we want before anything else. They keep pretending they're doing that. And they keep refusing to take them back under the interest of taking out Hamas for future safety or whatever you want to frame it as. So based on the obvious reality, they care less about the people they claim their saving than they do about their agenda. assuming their agenda is even actually about killing Amos, I don't think it is.

Starting point is 02:57:37 Because they will do the same thing again. And the only person that said will do the same thing again are the people in Qatar who speak up seemingly when they're pointed to. And the longer this goes on, the longer they stay in power, the more funding, I think the most recent documents that 150 million went through Sinwar and the documents that the idea got on the ground. The more money that Iran is funding. Oh, Iran. It's Iran now, right? Even though Israel just, you know, Horat will share that Israel is funding. them, but suddenly it's Iran now because you want to connect it with a larger conflict. You cannot just kill, you cannot just kill everybody in Gaza. You can't.

Starting point is 02:58:12 Israel is not intending to kill everyone in Gaza. If they carry on for many more months, they are carrying for many more months, how many people are going to get killed? Right. I can't answer that question as to how many people are going to be killed, but I can't tell you that not a single, not even one more person would be killed if Hamas surrendered unconditionally today. Again, it's just the same point.

Starting point is 02:58:34 Like, I would love to get in some kind of, you know, confront them with that point. Okay, so in the meantime, you're telling us you're going to continue to indiscriminately bomb as if everybody else is responsible for why the terrorist group that you're fighting doesn't just give up and walk forward. That's what you're saying. Like, that does not make any logical sense. Nobody else has that power. They are the only party you can deal with to make that argument.

Starting point is 02:58:59 They don't want to do that. So you can't just keep going one foot. five, month six, just make them surrender. They're not going to. So you continue to acknowledge the fact that you're choosing to murder everybody, essentially as a coercion tool into getting them to, that's what you're doing, including your own people, who you pretend is your primary objective.

Starting point is 02:59:19 All right. I want to find out. I guess something. Yes. I make a suggestion since that's a Yahoo and his government have, before October 7, have already, and previous Israeli governments have murdered more. more civilians than Hamas ever did, why don't we do, why don't we flip this equation and say that the hostages will be released once this and Yanu and his government are taken to the Hague

Starting point is 02:59:44 and, and, and, uh, and charged with war crimes. I think it makes much more sense. The Israelis have killed far more Palestinian children and Palestinian civilians than Hamas or any Palestinians ever have. She really attacks on guns. She doesn't even see flinch. No, no jump to try to defend that. I think it's not that they're proud of that. As a preceded Hamas, by decades. Israeli attacks in the West Bank go on. Israeli attacks in Jerusalem go on where Hamas is not in charge. Okay.

Starting point is 03:00:10 I mean, this whole Hamas excuse is ridiculous. Why do we do this? Let's wait until we remove Netanyahu's government and then negotiate. I think that should be the condition. And the Israeli military, which is a genocidal terrorist organization, is disarmed and dismantled. Now, see, obviously, I think this is what's building. A lot of people are making.

Starting point is 03:00:33 this similar argument, which again is why I argue somebody like Clinton has stepped up and been like, you're bad, Netanyahu, get out of the way. We're all on the same side, right? Hardly. It's not just Netanyahu, right? He knows that, clearly. We were just playing a clip from Miko here on the end of the last show. But if you do, if you, if you play that game, you could effectively kind of circumvent what they're trying to do there. And the average people who may not know as much as him will get kind of lost in that thinking if we get rid of Netanyahu, it's a win. And, you know, Netanyahu's on his way out anyway. He's multiple indictments. The guy is on, he's like the least, he's like the most hated prime minister in their

Starting point is 03:01:15 history. They want him out of the way. So getting him out of the way is not that difficult, right? The point is that they want to maintain the same agenda. And I'll tell you what, to be quite frank, Netanyahu is actually not as extreme as some of the people right behind him. That will be entirely. Okay, let me give the final word to the Palestinian on the panel, which is you, Omar. Look, we have to stop this pretense that Israel is engaging in accidental violence in which Palestinian civilians are killed. Every major human rights organization in the world, including, by the way, Israeli human rights organizations, document that the Israeli military is engaging in indiscriminate violence against civilians.

Starting point is 03:01:54 And that is why the International Court of Justice has found that there is actually a plausible case, for Israel being engaged in genocidal violence in Gaza. And that should tell you something. And we have to stop pretending that you can kill this many people on accident. And just one issue with something that you mentioned, peers, I don't think this is a question of proportionality. We have to be clear about what Israel is doing here.

Starting point is 03:02:14 This is not an act of self-defense because an occupier can never, in principle, be defending themselves against the people they're occupying. If we are serious, once again, what Israel is doing in Gaza, if they wanted self-defense. There were zero, there were zero Israelis in Gaza on October 6th, zero. Yeah. Inside, but they controlled Gaza. They bombed it at will whenever they wanted to and they prevented Palestinian-Imbuds.

Starting point is 03:02:38 It's funny how you never mentioned Egypt. No responsibility for Egypt. Everything is always Israel's fault. No, no, no, no, I'm sorry. Just these are rational arguments. See, the problem is these things used to make sense when people didn't understand the dynamic. Egypt has nothing to do with the illegal occupation of Gaza. Well, I should say nothing.

Starting point is 03:02:55 But the point is, in regard to the board, border that Israel controls every aspect of that. They just love to pretend like somehow they just allow this border to exist between the group. They claim their terrorists and their ally, their neighbor. Why does that even logically? So from a security perspective makes sense. It's not true. But that's all they have. The problem with that argument, the problem of that argument is this, is that when it wanted to, at the start of this war, Israel had the power and capability to turn off the energy into Gaza to turn off the internet, to turn off the water, to turn off the food supply. That is a form of occupation, even if you're not physically inside Gaza.

Starting point is 03:03:33 That's actually false. What Israel is defending. What is not full. System of the water. Yes, it is. They only control 30% of the water. That's not true. I'm tired of these, this, it's not true.

Starting point is 03:03:47 They have access and their ability to control literally everything that happens in this area. there is not an independent state in there. They completely control everything. Like we have to, and whether or not you want to momentarily pretend like you, if they wanted to, they could shut it down entirely. And that is what the international community has said for a very long time. I don't think Israel should have that power over any Palestinians. It's just interesting to see him suddenly making these arguments.

Starting point is 03:04:19 I was trying to find the pretty sure I had that video of her. I just played it by the way. what's her uh albinis actually oh here i can do that actually let me see if i could find it real quick there it is bing oh maybe not shoot oh well well i you i've played this before let me see one more look real quick yeah oh well well well basically she's a you know unrapporteur and she's speaking up on behalf of the reality that gaza is occupied that's frustrating i know i downloaded that let me do one more thing

Starting point is 03:05:09 bear with me as I have let's see if I saved it in this file I'm trying to keep these up funny enough is after my computer crash last time I've been really reluctant to build these tabs up again the save stuff

Starting point is 03:05:27 because I hate my visibility so frustrated to lose it all oh well okay back to the point so here we have the reality through Reuters acknowledging

Starting point is 03:05:41 that they reject the ceasefire proposal. Now, even based on their arguments, it's becoming clear that they are aware, that ultimately it's, we're refusing their bad offer. But remember at first, it was they're not even offering, which shows you that they were aware

Starting point is 03:05:58 at some level that it would not stand. They had to make it out that there was simply no offer, that Hamas just refused to deal with us, and they remember in the beginning? We won't deal with terrorist groups. They have that narrative set, even though they were. and they were just refusing it.

Starting point is 03:06:12 And that eventually came out, which is why they had to grudgingly take that small pause. But they have made sure from the very beginning. They did not want this to happen. And this is yet again. I think this is like a fourth time. Netanyahu once again rejects the ceasefire proposal, insisting instead on total victory over Hamas.

Starting point is 03:06:30 And just so this is clear, the only way to read this, the Israeli government chose war with Hamas, even if you think that leads to a positive end for the same people, instead of the immediate rescuing of its people, knowing that the war would almost certainly take their lives. Here's the article, if you want to read it for yourself. Craig Murray writes,

Starting point is 03:06:52 So Netanyahu's position is he will never agree to any ceasefire until Israel has bombed to death all of the hostages they haven't killed yet. Exactly. David Coley writes, and this is a really interesting propaganda point, Hamas didn't offer a ceasefire. Yeah, they really did, though, which you can easily... I mean, here's what's funny. Netanyahu rejects ceasefire proposal from somebody else,

Starting point is 03:07:18 from Hamas, obviously, right? It says it right there. So he says they didn't. They called for Israel to withdraw. Well, here's the point, though. Part of their ceasefire agreement was for Israel to a ceasefire. It's a ceasefire. They would withdraw.

Starting point is 03:07:31 There'd be a ceasefire. There'd be exchange of hostages. Aid would come in. That's pretty stupidly obvious. But they want to make that into not a ceasefire, even though what obvious was part of it. I mean, is Israel calling it? for a, that's a way to put it.

Starting point is 03:07:45 Like the point is, there's agreements, they're not just about one thing. Israel's not just going pause. They're saying pause, and we exchange hostages. So by your logic, you would say it's not a pause. It's about hostage. It's the same thing. They're just pretending only one of those things can be in existence. That's just, this is just weak efforts.

Starting point is 03:08:03 But says, given the current military situation, it would be like Hitler asking the allies to surrender in early 1945. surrender. I didn't see a surrender anywhere in there, but this is how they keep playing this game, right? When you call for a ceasefire, Elon Levy pretends you're calling for amnesty for Hamas, even though I point out, then that means you don't understand the definition of amnesty. But they just love to make that the point. In this case, calling for ceasefire means you're asking to surrender. That's not the truth. Even if you want to conflate those and argue it default becomes that's not what's happening. It goes, Israel told them what to do with their delusional

Starting point is 03:08:41 No, in fact, you try to pretend it wasn't happening many times. But here's the interesting point in this that I think is the way to think about it, right? So he's saying the equivalent is it would be Hitler asking the allies to surrender. But I argue the equivalent would be if Hitler offered to release all of the imprisoned Jews. If the U.S. government withdrew, right? Okay. So in that context, the point was that they were trying to, like historically trying to save all the people, right? But again, you could argue at that moment that the U.S. was far more interest in

Starting point is 03:09:15 their war than the people, right? That's obvious. So the equivalent would be if Hitler was like, we'll release everybody if you just back away. My point is the same with Gaza. Just because they would go, okay, we withdraw. Let all the people go. Does that mean they couldn't just go right back in? That's obviously what, even if they wrote down an agreement, that's what they would probably do. Same goes for Gaza. Same goes for any situation. But the point with, it continued the logic, the analogy forward, it would be as if he offered to release everybody if the U.S. would drew, but then instead, the U.S. pushed forward anyway,

Starting point is 03:09:53 knowing that those people would die in the way that they expected them to. That's the real analogy. But you see, he tries to make it about surrender and about somehow, somehow by doing this is surrendering to the Nazis. Because that's the best you can do. It's just so incredibly frustrating. You're using analogy that actually exposes your position in a bad way because you just want to call them Nazis because that's the best argument you got. She said the bottom line it comes down to they don't care about the people they're trying to rescue.

Starting point is 03:10:25 They care more about the war. Thank you for making my point, David. Well, I'll let you watch this on your own time again. So as he's pretending he cares about the hostages, you know what? Let's just play this. For those that haven't seen it, important to see this. oh wait maybe i didn't download it since we're long anyway or maybe just a part of it anyway so as he's screaming about how it's all about the people they care about the hostages and right

Starting point is 03:10:59 that's what they're that they clearly it's been proven and this is from uncaptured media or dan cohen specifically that they've killed their own people in more than one case too repeatedly in fact and i argue as i've been saying for a while now that that this is deliberate, that this is on purpose. This is the Hannibal Directive. Is Israel applying the Hannibal Directive to captives and hostages in the Gaza Strip? Hannibal Directive is a classified Israeli military protocol, which calls for use of all necessary means to prevent the abduction of its own forces,

Starting point is 03:11:43 even at the price of killing them. It has been used multiple times in the past decade. Most notably, in the 2014 capture of Israeli soldier Hadar Golden, Taken into a tunnel near Rafa, Israel unleashed massive firepower, killing him in more than 130 Palestinians. The Hannibal Directive was also widely implemented on October 7th in order to prevent captives from being taken into Gaza, not only soldiers, but civilians. Numerous Israelis who have since been released from captivity said that Israeli bombing was the greatest threat to their lives. Not more than a hour that we're sitting there, and I'm

Starting point is 03:12:24 shone the first time of that of course of air. There was a very much of one day and just all the gulf had to read me and then after it in the borker, he said, the bionale had we were, it was a bit of course. We're saying,

Starting point is 03:12:37 Bona, eschewarim more than usurring more than us From the booms around that the IDF doesn't know our location, suddenly a missile would hit. And there were a ma'on of times that I'm...

Starting point is 03:12:51 ...and I'm... ...theimuth of the Tileysrael... ...and not from the Hamas. What the thing that's the most... ...theircuh Mugab... ...their Chal... ...on December 15th, Israeli forces killed three Israeli captives who were shirtless

Starting point is 03:13:10 and held a white flag. On January 15th, captive Noah Argamani said two others were killed in air strikes. Tais Sviriski, Yose Sharabi... Rabbi, shanenna, metu, from our our

Starting point is 03:13:21 chris the attack to end up our our family for our our own we're in

Starting point is 03:13:26 our home. One former captive told Benjamin Netanyahu I was in a

Starting point is 03:13:34 house surrounded by explosions. We slept in tunnels and we feared that not Hamas

Starting point is 03:13:39 but Israel might kill us and then it would have been said Hamas killed you. So I'll

Starting point is 03:13:44 leave it there since I'm going to try to go through this quickly. but I'll include as well, Cuds News Network, is roundly reported even by Israeli platforms.

Starting point is 03:13:55 Yair Net and Yahoo was caught on a telegram channel discussing how the military did not execute the Hannibal Directive fully. He said there's a procedure called the Hannibal Directive. The planes that were supposed to be in the air on Gaza border were supposed to be destroying everything that moves there, crush everything, and thus we would not have had 256 prisoners. The fact that did not bomb mean,

Starting point is 03:14:18 that there is a big problem with the Air Force. So they didn't kill enough of their people. That's the problem. Exactly. Now, just again, rapidly, maybe some I'll go through after this. I reached out to Freddie Pontone about this because it was in French. I just wanted to make sure you saw this, how ridiculous this is. That's funny.

Starting point is 03:14:37 Of course, the translation goes away. It was there before. Oh, no, there's right there. Okay, good. So Sandra Eifra, who was like a woman's leader of this group about abused. I forget exactly. But the point is, she says, spoke up on a French channel, arguing, after the ceremony honoring French victims in Hamas,

Starting point is 03:14:55 quote, there was a Hamas hostage who had 67 different sperms found inside of her and going on to cite all the atrocity propaganda nonsense. The rate, that's what actually was said. There is zero evidence of anything like that. First of all, not a single person, not from hostages or from October 7, has ever come forward, claims. I was raped. It's always been secondary through people who have otherwise been caught lying about a lot. So she is giving you a secondhand report of something she was told. It's nowhere. This doesn't exist. Quite frankly, I'm arguing it's not real. The point is you can look for this and you'll find a lot of the same old people, the same accounts you might expect with big followings sharing this,

Starting point is 03:15:43 as if it was fact. Why? Because this one woman says she heard that on a show in a French channel. That's how great media is today in the corporate field. That's what they said, because that's the narrative I like to spread. 67, you realize how crazy it is to go this far when, and this is at the time when there's a lot of other things falling apart. Autrosity propaganda seems the only direction they can go in at this point. Remember, there is so much that has been lied about that they keep pushing these narratives. The entire allegation of rape has been put away by most every international, because nothing else has come forward.

Starting point is 03:16:21 They pushed and they pushed and they pushed as if there was more about to come. There's nothing. Their own outlets proved that they never took forensic evidence, which is ridiculous. That to me tells you right there that they knew there wasn't enough. They lied about everything, including pelvic bones being broken, even though you could look up the reality of how wildly difficult, impossible. It takes a car wreck level of trauma to cause that. Not one person, not 10 people.

Starting point is 03:16:47 It's ridiculous. arguments and the evidence that's gone forward showing you that they staged certain things. They lied about certain things. They lied about babies being hurt. It's crazy. So the idea that we can just jump to 67. I mean, if that was real, if there was evidence for that, it would be everywhere. And I'm not saying that. That's why I think it's fake. I think that's fake because the evidence already backs up that there is no evidence. How are we pretending they got 67 different sperm when they already admitted there was no forensic evidence and that time has already passed? Now, that's October 7. Now, if someone comes home from being in Gaza, this would have been tested,

Starting point is 03:17:24 the information would have been reported, and this would have been a bigger story. But on top of that, nobody has ever come forward discussing this from the individual person, the family members, nothing. This comes out through a random woman supporting the narrative of Israel and what happened there on a French channel. And again, Freddie Pontone went through this and we were talking about because it's in French, and there's no evidence to this. This is the kind of stuff that put forward and the media bites down. Just to play the opening part of this. Here is Jeremy Schaill, just acknowledging what we keep telling you.

Starting point is 03:17:56 Within hours of these attacks happening, the Netanyahu government began to craft a very deliberate propaganda campaign to sell the United States, other Western leaders, and the global public on a scorched earth war of annihilation against Gaza. And this campaign kicked into such high gear. immediately. And what they did, what was central to this, is that the Israelis began showing President Biden, Secretary of State Blinken, the heads of state of NATO countries and other Western nations, images and videos that they then proceeded to tell an unverified story about what they depicted. And the characterization from Netanyahu and Defense Minister Yoav Golan was that this was the greatest act of violence

Starting point is 03:18:46 against Jewish people since the Holocaust, that the tactics that Hamas used included rape, beheading of babies, mutilation of bodies, torture of families, the bounding of children in groups, including in a nursery in one of the kibbutzs, and then engaging in mass execution of small children, setting children on fire. And President Biden, Secretary Blinken, and many Western leaders then started to repeat these claims. But what happened is that when Israeli Social Security Agency began to actually document the deaths on October 11th, they documented 1,139 deaths, 695 of them were civilians, and we started reviewing the public documentation of the deaths. It turns out that there was only one infant that was killed in all of the attacks combined on October 7th, the nine-month-old baby. And that's the crux of the point, right?

Starting point is 03:19:45 So 40 beheaded babies? Nope. 15 on a clothes line? No. One in a mom's stomach. One in the oven? No. None of this happened.

Starting point is 03:19:55 None of it. And that's been proven even by herettes, as we've shown you. Discussing the exact, you can read it for yourself. It's in Hebrew. In translation, not all of which happened to reality. And they explicitly discussed the rape conversation, the baby in the oven, the woman's stomach being cut open. These were lies. They were proven that they could not have happened based on, like he said, the fact that there's

Starting point is 03:20:15 only one child in the entire conversation. Or, I mean, there's so many different ways to prove this, including examples from people who claim that they know this didn't happen. Or examples of showing you they've been caught lying about things that we can prove didn't. That even the reporters or even the IDF walked back and said, no, that didn't happen. And yet we can't acknowledge, I mean, so this is the problem. And now Israel, their main account says, rape is not resistance. And then show this weird clip without the date of attackers laughed as they raped and murder.

Starting point is 03:20:44 No, that was witness says. It turns out a witness who, this is all information that comes through the same Zaka groups and the same, the people that have already been caught lying. And guess what? The rape story, as we just discussed, is not backed up by evidence. But is there anybody, anywhere, arguing that rape was legitimate resistance? All that is is conflating things like, well, I'm saying that, you know, legal international law armed resistance.

Starting point is 03:21:11 Well, that's why I make an explicit point to say anything. after that that was a crime is not included. Nobody out there is going rape because we're fighting for freedom. They're just trying to conflate people promoting pro-Palestine positions as somehow supporting all the atrocities they allege happened. Nobody's doing that. It's just absurd because this is desperation. And same thing. First of all, this woman who nobody has yet to prove it all would actually happened, as much as I would also argue that the brown, the gray pants with the stain would it be indicative of something, still haven't been proven. We don't know what actually happened. And yet that's become this idol of this whole conversation. Rape is not resistance,

Starting point is 03:21:52 they say, again. Who's saying that? Who is arguing that rape is resistance? Anybody? Israel saying that we're saying that, but we're not. Here's Hillary Clinton. Ali Abu-Auban points out that war criminal Hillary Clinton is hosting a Columbia panel on conflict-related sexual violence based largely on lies about October 7th. And that's how this works. Even as she is over here going Netanyahu bad, you're over here promoting the lies. Part of the agenda. Cuts News Network points out a new investigation by Israel's Khan News has revealed that dozens

Starting point is 03:22:30 of Israelis, in fact, lied, claiming that they were attending the NOAA Music Festival on October 7th to earn dozens of thousands of shekels in compensation. The investigation stated that the individual individual, in question presented false evidence, claiming that they were victims of Palestinian resistance. Gee, I wonder if that's where some of these fake stories came from, or maybe they were told to do that. This raises questions about whether Israel used such false evidence to support the narrative of October 7th. Here, Albaer points out, pretend to be shocked. This is the same point, IsraelCon News broadcasted revealed in his investigation that dozens of Israelis lied fraudulently claiming they were victims of October 7.

Starting point is 03:23:10 And of course, as much as it was like near impossible to locate, I did find it. This is the actual, this is the breakdown. You can watch the video without shame, the Israelis who pose as survivors of the Nova Massacre. Now, I mean, trust me, there's a reason this stuff is so hard to find. We search for the exact title. We saw, we were searching nowhere. I was lucky enough to find this in an abstract way. But the point is you try to search for this stuff.

Starting point is 03:23:39 You don't find it. there's a reason for that. This is important. They're telling you that Israelis pretended to be raped, pretended to be abused in order to make money off of the larger lie, which Israel was all too happy to blindly accept, because it's all been a bunch of lies. I don't mean that in the sense of that Hamas didn't do anything,

Starting point is 03:23:59 that there weren't crimes committed. I mean about the atrocity propaganda. They've been caught. And on top of that, the Nova Rafe Security Chief actually confirms on top of everything that Israel neglected alerts. Now, this, you should act, on top of it, you should ask whether this might be floated in the interest of covering up that they actually just failed.

Starting point is 03:24:20 They really just didn't see it coming because they were just not as good as they said they were. That's certainly possible. But either way, it's being reported from one of these guards saying, I'm a guard at the festival who had served in the Reamed Division. There's somebody speaking to their friends saying, and a week before the festival, he sent me a voice message, basically warning me saying, something's going to happen. I just wanted to let you know that there's a lot of warnings.

Starting point is 03:24:42 Now that goes by. The person asks after October 7th, finds the person, and says, I told him, I wanted to talk to you about the recording you sent me a week before the festival. You were speaking in codes. Tell me exactly what they said to you. He told me, quote, they told me there was going to be an invasion and that they planned to take over towns. I just wasn't allowed to tell you that. Wow.

Starting point is 03:25:06 So either this is a way to cover. cover up the fact that they're just incompetent. But I'm kind of leaning the other direction here. I'm kind of leaning that it makes more sense to me that, let's just say the religious Zionism party. The extremist entities wanted this to happen so they could reposition themselves as the attacked Jewish population that is suppressed. And so we need Israel to support.

Starting point is 03:25:30 That's a Zionist manipulation of Judaism. Either way, I think that that's possible. And there was a lot of evidence of people that was four. knowledge and it seems to me that that was them knowing this would happen it might be the parts of of israeli government didn't know that it says this is the late i mean we could be very well be watching a coup take place in israel for all we know this is the latest of a growing number of reports that israeli authorities ignored multiple warnings very interesting now samusani's pointing out that south africa needs to be doing more right that it's very clear that they're not following the orders

Starting point is 03:26:07 and the good thing was there are now other groups speaking up. Nicaragua has request permission to intervene, basically just in a legal sense that they're speaking up on behalf of South Africa's case and that Israel is doing everything they say they're doing. So this is changing. And this is just in general, as we kind of wrap up here, Israel's committed 15 massacres. Guys, this is every day.

Starting point is 03:26:29 Don't let this become white noise because it is every day. You'll find these posts every day because it is every day. 15 massacres in the past 24 hours. 130 civilians, 170 wounded, which brings the provable total to 27,840 killed, most of which are women and children. This is snipers shooting at medical staff in a Cere hospital and Con Unis, you know, the safe zone. They say they're obsessing with killing humiliation and torture of medical staff, a tactic that has no strategic value unless you're committing a genocide. And they are, they're just shooting at people. It's everywhere.

Starting point is 03:27:04 Here's conunis in general, the area that's supposed to be safe. Israeli's 55th Fair Troopers Brigade actually released this on their own channels. Involving the killing of an unarmed individual, destruction of the neighborhoods, mosques, and in some cases the entire village. Look at this. This is them posting this proudly doing, you know, we're blowing up their homes, we're killing this innocent person. See that?

Starting point is 03:27:28 We're shopping bag. They posted that. They're laughing about this. This is the reality. That's why, and that's why they're tagging the ICJ, which, by the way, it seems like they're actually cataloging. They're laughing about this because they don't think they're going to be held accountable. The cradle points out, and this one, this one, I think this is the one of, yeah, this one makes me sick.

Starting point is 03:27:51 This is a bunch of children at a protected location, in Rafa, by the way. We'll get to this point, I mean, I'm probably just going to try to wrap this up. Like, I don't mean, like, Rush, I think actually do this to finish, but I know I say this every time. Rafa is where they're supposed to go. After Kahn Yunus, both of which are supposed to be safe, the point is there is nowhere else after Rafa. Egypt is the only other place. So now that they're bombing in Rafa,

Starting point is 03:28:15 I mean, this is literally fishing a barrel. They don't have anywhere to go. So what's the internet? What's the USA? Where's Blinken? He's trying to pretend like you care about these people. There is nowhere else for them to move to. They're telling them you can't go back north.

Starting point is 03:28:28 We'll shoot you. That's what they're saying. They're saying you got to leave Kahn Unis. It's going to go to Raffa because we're going to bomb Kahn Yon. We've got to move Raff. We're going to go after Raff. Rafa will invade. They're literally telling you they're executing these people.

Starting point is 03:28:39 This is a location in Rafa where they have displaced children and they bomb it. And that's right behind their tennis. You've got children trying to do whatever events they were trying to do and trying to have some semblance of life and they bomb it. And these are protected locations that are acknowledged, that tell them where they are and they just, they don't even have to make the excuse of Hamas anymore. They just, that's just the foregone conclusion. Oh, they bombed, though it must be Hamas. Doesn't that work out nicely for them?

Starting point is 03:29:21 Look at this. People die. Gosh, makes me sick. Yeah, I don't want you to see the graphic stuff, guys. Children. A whole group of children. I have soldiers conducted a drone strike on an ambulance. Now watch this one.

Starting point is 03:29:46 This one's actually a really important one for, for, for, from a legal perspective. Look at how crowd of this street is. Right on the top of the video there underneath the hearts, you're going to see an ambulance right there. You can see a bunch of civilians right around it. Watch what happens. That is what happens.

Starting point is 03:30:08 That is an illegal act, no matter how you spin it. I don't care if you think Hamas is in the ambulance. That is a public street for civilians. And they're all around them. They're brazen at this point. They just don't care. Here's another. These are all different examples.

Starting point is 03:30:26 Palestinian Red Crescent, paramedics, killed. Several was injured as Israeli forces open fire on their ambulances while they're transferring patients. These are Hamas members. You can see these are just average people. They're transferring people to hospitals and they bomb them. No one's even giving excuses anymore. Israel's military shoots and kills two paramedics who are simply helping to evacuate

Starting point is 03:30:47 wounded from Gaza City. David Collier. This is someone that was denying before. Here's what he says. is no genocide in Gaza, right? Ignore all the human rights groups, every UN entity, Oxfam, every one of them. Ignore it. Ignore the world court who said that he's wrong. David knows better. He says the genocide myth is a fake story created to demonize Israel. So apparently in his mind, literally everybody and every entity that, by the way, they would otherwise tell you to listen to

Starting point is 03:31:15 every other time until now, suddenly all hates Israel to the point to where they would undermine every ounce of credibility they have just to hurt them? I mean, this is one of those points is what's more logical that literally everyone in the world is wrong and you're right or the opposite. So both are possible, but it's obvious what's happening right now and help save Hamas, right? Because Human Rights Watch wants to save Hamas, because Amnesty wants to save Hamas,

Starting point is 03:31:40 because Betzelm wants to save Hamas, Oxfam, UN, everyone, they want to save Hamas. That's what's happening. The world court, every one of the judges, except to think one or two, wants to save Hamas? How do you make sense of that? The 30,000 strong group inside of this one location in the world. Explain it for me, bud. Sadly, he says many ignorant fools across the world have given the genocide myth legs. It just sounds stupid. Here's a question none of them ever answer.

Starting point is 03:32:07 How many of them were dead terrorists? You know why we can't, David? Because nobody knows that. Because they don't have any information either, which proves to you that they're indiscriminately killing people. And they've admitted that. On top of that, Is your argument actually that we should not care about anything because they might be terrorists? Yep. I don't think he realizes how bad that looks for him. How many were terrible? Yeah, exactly.

Starting point is 03:32:32 How many? Do you know? I could tell you that the 10,000 children weren't, right? Do you not care about that? Like, they trap themselves because these people are so desperate. I mean, he's apparently an award-winning journalist. Hopefully, hopefully, going to lose every bit of influence. he's ever had because he's revealing that at the very least on this topic, he is a child.

Starting point is 03:32:55 I just can't believe that. Again, to make it clear, they've made it obvious that they don't, I mean, the entire article was just written about the reality that they don't fully know what's actually happening. They're estimating. And on top of that, there's 10,000 children at the very least, 124 members of the UN, 127 journalists. Are you pretending they're all terrorists? that's the, he doesn't know. And so his point is, we're going to ignore all of these crimes in the interest of just they might be terrorists. That's gaslighting for terrorism.

Starting point is 03:33:30 And then again, here's the breakdown. As even Israeli's intelligence apparatus is using as correct. That's been admitted too. They're taking the gods of health ministry data for their own intelligence reports. That's been discussed by Israeli media. Tiberius writes, they call it the Israel Hamas War. to detract from the fact that over 90% of the victims are innocent Palestinian civilians. How does a conflict between two groups end up with over 90% of the casualties belonging to neither?

Starting point is 03:34:00 It doesn't. It's a war on Gaza, on Palestine, and it's decades old. Cuts News Network, it's now 112, that was 7, 124 journalists killed. I mean, it's as simple as that. Al Jazeera in Lebanon, right in the beginning, or rather, Reuters, in fact. that was it wasn't al-Jazeera it was a reuters journalist in lebanon right in the beginning which that we could that in fact t-lav was one of the first people to break that story when even the court even roiders hadn't admitted the reality why because it was provable right when it

Starting point is 03:34:35 happened i think that was it right there that's their article i was going to give you mine oh no that's not the same one six people killed in a school in gaza that used to be big news Nor points out due to the presence of an Israeli sniper, citizens are now resorting to, look at this, dragging this water jug back and forth by a string because they know they're going to get shot if they walk in the street. You know, because democracy. And here is how they're pretending that makes sense.

Starting point is 03:35:03 Here is one of these Israeli military entities who is making the same argument that woman just made on the news, but now they're just coming out with it. Why is it all okay? Because every one of them are terrorists. It's what we kept telling you they've always been saying. His point is that every house, every mosque, every school has a tunnel. So we have to kill all of them.

Starting point is 03:35:21 But we're only going after Hamas, though. Can you paint a picture of the largesse of weapons, the cache of weapons that have been found since October 7th began? Because many of those weapons also came in then. You know, when you look at the Gaza Strip, a civilian who never went there, you could see a picture of it or a video of it. You see houses.

Starting point is 03:35:47 Now there's a lot of destruction there. What you cannot see is the underground facilities under the houses, but you also cannot see the amount of weapons and explosives that were hidden in ordinary houses. Israeli troops, as they are now more on search and destroy. So what you have to do is wait for them to present it to you on a sheet out in the open and tell you where they found it and why it's relevant. Sort of like the video they show people that now we know is fake.

Starting point is 03:36:15 I wonder if it's the same thing. What do you think? A lot of missions going through areas where there's already very little enemy activity, but they're going through and making sure to dismantle all of the infrastructure, the weapons and the rocket launches, etc. There's hardly a house that our troops go to that doesn't have either an entrance to a tunnel, a shaft, or weapons that are stocked inside, or explosives, or where they're manufacturing weapons,

Starting point is 03:36:42 or it's a hideout for terrorist activity. Right. So whatever you want, you pick. Whatever you want it to be, that's what they're guilty. They're all dead because one of those things was happening. It's just so, it's just there's not a word in, there's not enough to express how messed up this all is. Not only just because that's crazy,

Starting point is 03:37:04 but because everybody seems to know that, including the ones that are allowing it. I found the article here. Reuters journalist killed by Israeli bombing October 13th. It took them like a month for even Reuters to admit that happened. Unra pointing out, the situation is catastrophic. Now, I want you to hear this. There is not a single house that was not damaged.

Starting point is 03:37:26 This is the United Nations telling you there's not a single house that was not damaged in northern Gaza. Not a single house. And that's why that's what they're saying. Well, it's because they're all terrorists. It's just, this is what everybody said would never happen. All the ones gas sliding for this acting like they're only pinpoint targeting Hamas as they just level the area as they are promoting the building of settlements but pretending that's not happening. Not a single house was undamaged. CNN, we're slowly dying.

Starting point is 03:37:57 Palestinians are eating grass and drinking polluted water, but who cares? Who cares, right? Because we're trying. They're dying. They're starving to death. Israel's policy of starvation in Gaza will have long-term effects, causing famine. The point is there's children every day. starving. And this is being reported on the ground of children actually dying of starvation right now.

Starting point is 03:38:18 Millions at risk of starving in Gaza, Israelis, actively continue to prevent aid. Despite Israeli army declaring Gaza border military zone, what they did, Jewish protesters continue to arrive at the border crossing and block the passage. It's like 10, 12 days in a row now. And my point was, it's a coordinated effort. Here's the tents they're camping out in. they're all uniform. Someone gave it to them. As I said, it's a coordinated effort led by the Israeli government to stop the aid from getting to Palestinians.

Starting point is 03:38:48 Even as children are literally starving to death every day now, per human rights groups. Note the uniform tense. And here's a Mossad video where they're going, thank you all that came out yesterday to prevent the aid. As I said, notice how all the tents are uniform. They're openly supporting this, guys. This is genocide.

Starting point is 03:39:07 They're actively starving. people to death. And oh, and here's where they bombed the water distribution tank, killing 13 people in the process, all civilians, including seven children. But as long as we stop the water from people who need it, then democracy, right? And this is Arnod Batran. See where we are. I think, yeah, I'm just going to, this is just the same thing you'd expect. Ask you why the unra, why it's okay to cut funny to Unra when there's no evidence. Her answer is, well, other people can fund them too. Just gross. Absolutely. disgusting. Canadian officials, by the way, still haven't seen intelligence that links the UN

Starting point is 03:39:44 agency to Hamas. That was yesterday. This is how ridiculous this is. Even the Canadian platforms, which by the way, tend to be pretty bad. We haven't seen any evidence. That's how this ended up. The Limkin Institute says the same thing. After the light of the posity of evidence, the Limkin Institute expects that the countries who have suspended promised aid to UNRWA will now reinstate that aid. They won't do it because it's about propaganda and an agenda. The point is their evidence has fallen apart because it didn't exist. Just like with the atrocity propaganda, they floated as if it's all in the works. It's coming soon. And nope, it's all insinuation, allegations, lies. Canadian and Ramallah points out another diplomatic mission has called

Starting point is 03:40:29 it Israel to cease demolitions, schools, everything else in the West Bank. But yeah, that's happening too. This is coming from Belgium, Canada, Denmark, Finland, Finland, France. Germany, Italy, Ireland, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, Spain, Sweden, the UK, the European Union, all of them in regard to the diplomatic missions calling for this. Lastly, UNRWA pointing out intense fighting in Con Unis, the last 15 days. 290 attacks impacting UN locations, killing 389 people, sheltering within protected, acknowledged UN locations. That used to be the biggest story in the world.

Starting point is 03:41:06 Nobody cares about it right now. and David Roth Lindbergh pointing out Israeli fighter jets are now striking Rafa. So where else are they going to go? They're literally pinned in when nope, they're not allowed to go anywhere else. Israel's telling them to go to Rafa and then bombing Rafa like they've been doing the entire time. It says the city of Rafa was designated a safe area. And then they bombed it. And now they're apparently getting ready to invade.

Starting point is 03:41:34 And remember, they just put leaflets. This was like two days ago. conunis saying go to rafa go to rafa and then like the same day they bomb rafa it's insulting everybody can see this blink into bbby yesterday u.s very concerned about the possible israeli ground operation of rafa just makes you sick that's what you got how about you go stop the genocide how about we don't fund you because you're murdering children no we're very concerned about your illegal in genocide shut up like it just this person is not real what you're doing is worse than doing nothing.

Starting point is 03:42:11 Anra, enormous concern. Fear in Rafa in the last 48 hours, we've seen some very heavy airstrikes. It's undeniable. Here's what Elon Levy says. The UN is complicit with the Hamas human shield strategy. What they say? UN says he's really offensive

Starting point is 03:42:31 and overcrowded Rafa could amount to war crimes. His response, you're complicit in their human shield strategy. I mean, do I even just say it? That screams desperation. That is exactly, nobody who is honest is ever going to buy that. Not because you might, what if Hamas is there? It's the same point from the beginning.

Starting point is 03:42:52 You're murdering civilians on a massive scale because you claim, okay, prove it. Right? Elon, give me the evidence that shows Hamas is even in that location. They don't have it. It's insinuation, it's allegation. And in fact, it's been proven for 972 magazine, Amnesty International. even the IDF themselves, that they are not doing that. They're bombing wherever they want to because it's not about Hamas.

Starting point is 03:43:17 UN says it's really offensive. The nerve-cravid Rafa could amount to war crimes. And then, of course, he just tries to pivot another way and goes, we don't even want Gaza. That's why we left in 2005, even though that's ridiculously false. I thought I had it right there maybe. I wish I'd included that. The point is obviously they still occupy the area.

Starting point is 03:43:34 It's blindly obvious. He says the Palestinians can have it. Oh, is that why you're pushing them into Egypt? Problem is, they used to launch missiles and blah, blah, blah. It's just the same old regurgitated nonsense. And I said, liar as usual. Is that why cabinet ministers are jubilant in their calls to go back into Gaza and remove them? It's like their own narrative is destroyed by their own narratives.

Starting point is 03:43:56 It's embarrassing. And I'll leave you with this. Al-on Mizari points out, if you're Jewish and you want to combat anti-Semitism, at this point, there is only one thing you can do. Distance yourself from Israel's action. the more Jews speak out against this horror, the better chance of fair treatment we have as a collective in the post-genocide world. Believe me, he says. The paranoia and revenge camp is trying to drag us all into this so as to make sure we are all for this.

Starting point is 03:44:27 For their genocide. They are trying to monopolize our very humanity. Every human should speak out and speak up about grave injustice. But if you're Jewish at this particular moment in history, this may have actual remediation. for your own people, community, family, and self. It shouldn't in a world where people aren't... The point is that, yeah, people are dumb. People are reactive, and they will tend to take the narrative

Starting point is 03:44:48 that even at their failure, Zionists will put in front of them. Blaming the Jewish people for their Zionist agenda. And then his point is that even then, even when this falls apart and even when we're post-that genocidal... that people will still, in some ways, view that as Jewish people were part of it. Now, in essence, you can argue that there's a clear, large entity of Jewish people within Israel that blindly support their agenda. But I will always point out, look, individuals are responsible for their choices, always.

Starting point is 03:45:19 Nonetheless, you have to factor in the fact, just like I point out with the U.S., that the government has blindly propagandized people to be supporting of terrible wars, wars based on profit. But they don't think that. They know, it's freedom, whatever else. So it's the same concept. A lot of these people believe in whatever. Israel has propagandized them to think. It doesn't remove their accountability for their actions, but it's important to consider that too.

Starting point is 03:45:42 His point is, if you're a Jewish person and you can see that what they're doing is bad, speak up about it to help avoid whatever future might happen because of assumptions like that that are done because of the Zionist agenda. But it says, do not give us give into pressure. Speak out, speak up. You have no idea how stupid and potentially disastrous

Starting point is 03:46:00 your silence will look in a couple of years. I mean, looks that way right now. don't let this be understood as something Jews as a collective united behind, which I already think that's clear it's not the case. I quite frankly think there are more Jewish groups pushing back against this than there are supporting it. But it says you must not let this happen. Speak.

Starting point is 03:46:20 I agree. And we'll leave it there today. Thank you for tuning in, guys. There's just so much to talk about. There's so much important stuff going on. I just thought it was really important today to pull on these other two discussions as, you know, as it's people suffering around the world. It matters, especially when you can recognize that it's not, you know,

Starting point is 03:46:39 some random series of events, but being orchestrated, allowed, driven into reality for the benefit of a corporation, a government, or, you know, anything other than the interest of the people at hand, you know, in these countries, it's just constant. And again, it's something we need to come to terms with as Americans, as people of the world, that in most cases your governments are willing to abuse your interest, your rights, the resources of your country for their own agenda. And I think that is, I mean, obviously, that's why these governments would fight to put

Starting point is 03:47:14 somebody they can control in these places so they can exploit that. And in the U.S.'s case, do so in acting like you're fighting for people's interests, which, as I've always said, is the worst of the worst. A murderer is a bad person, but a murderer who pretends they're saving people is worse than the person not. I think that that's why I think that Trump was better than others because he just, he showed you, he took the mask off or taken the oil.

Starting point is 03:47:40 It's like, well, yeah, you're disgusting, but at least I can see that. That's, I think that's important. But I see things shifting. I really truly believe that things are shifting, but it's always a mixed fact. If we don't capitalize on that momentum, if we don't step in and do something and raise awareness

Starting point is 03:47:58 and keep doing so, there are entities that will always find ways to roll it back in. Q add on and Russia Gate and all these different ways, they will use your awareness to fold you back into the same problems. See through it. You're smarter. We have all always been smarter than they give us credit for. And I think they're just now kind of coming to terms with that.

Starting point is 03:48:25 Stand up, speak out, find the courage. I love you all. As always, question. everything, come to your own conclusions. Stay vigilant.

The Last American Vagabond - Haiti Fights To End Western Exploitation, Congo Continues To Be Manipulated & Israel Defeated Itself

There aren't comments yet for this episode. Click on any sentence in the transcript to leave a comment.