The Last American Vagabond - Internet of Bio-NanoThings Is Upon Us, US Bombs For Genocide & Israel Kills Hostage w/ Poison Gas

Episode Date: January 20, 2024

Welcome to The Daily Wrap Up, a concise show dedicated to bringing you the most relevant independent news, as we see it, from the last 24 hours (1/20/24).As always, take the information discussed in the video below and research it for yourself, and come to your own conclusions. Anyone telling you what the truth is, or claiming they have the answer, is likely leading you astray, for one reason or another. Stay Vigilant.!function(r,u,m,b,l,e){r._Rumble=b,r[b]||(r[b]=function(){(r[b]._=r[b]._||[]).push(arguments);if(r[b]._.length==1){l=u.createElement(m),e=u.getElementsByTagName(m)[0],l.async=1,l.src="https://rumble.com/embedJS/u2q643"+(arguments[1].video?'.'+arguments[1].video:'')+"/?url="+encodeURIComponent(location.href)+"&args="+encodeURIComponent(JSON.stringify([].slice.apply(arguments))),e.parentNode.insertBefore(l,e)}})}(window, document, "script", "Rumble"); Rumble("play", {"video":"v45nn9f","div":"rumble_v45nn9f"});Video Source Links (In Chronological Order): Scott C. Smith Interview - EPA & Norfolk Southern Continue To Hide East Palestine's Dioxin Poisoning Scott C. Smith Interview - The East Palestine Diaster And The Continuing EPA Cover Up Investigation Found East Palestine "Controlled Burn" Unnecessary (Norfolk Lied) & Israel Bombs Syria Up To 14,000% More Dioxins In East Palestine Homes Compared To Control & The France Psyop The Clean Harbors Waste Disposal Ohio Scandal, Azov Hong Kong Protesters & Ideological Subversion New Tab (7) Patricia P. on X: "@paintsmithUSA @TheChiefNerd w/o #TwoPartyIllusion bs, this fair &honest analysis by @TLAVagabond of Trump vax delusion or his ignorance? min marker 28:00 or back it up for more context for many like myself this is a litmus test. https://t.co/YTJ9ha0GdT" / X Gain-Of-Function's Newest "Brain Virus" & Genetically Engineered Proteins To Control... Everything Frontiers | Human Brain/Cloud Interface (6) Amazing Polly Isn't Here to Compromise on X: "While we were sleeping this is what the telecommunications and satellite people were doing. IntraBioNets Control / communication between the human body and satellites. And this was written pre 2020 https://t.co/Gdwz46AIVX https://t.co/s6GwAfp28U" / X Projects – Dr. Ian F. Akyildiz Microbiome-Gut-Brain Axis as a Biomolecular Communication Network for the Internet of Bio-NanoThings | IEEE Journals & Magazine | IEEE Xplore A novel switch to turn genes on/off on cue Denver medical team receives live Ebola vaccines | 9news.com Denver Health administers 1st shots of Ebola vaccines Package Insert - ERVEBO Screen Shot 2024-01-20 at 2.48.34 PM.png (2558×1334) ERVEBO | FDA (6) We Are All ❤️🖤🤍💚 on X: "@SandraWeeden @tlavagabond" / X (7) El hombre que ríe (The Man Who Laughs) on X: "@TLAVagabond @SlowNewsDayShow" / X New Tab (19) R A W S A L E R T S on X: "🚨#BREAKING: A group called the Patriot Front are currently marching down at the World Trade Center 📌#Manhattan l #NewYork Currently, approximately 90-150 individuals identified as the "Patriot Front" and recognized as a right-wing organization are advancing towards the 9/11… https://t.co/aTiFZtNqdV" / X The Patriot Front, January 6th & The "Vanilla ISIS" Psyop Rights Groups Demand Israel Stop Arming neo-Nazis in Ukraine - Israel News - Haaretz.com For years, Netanyahu propped up Hamas. Now it's blown up in our faces | The Times of Israel Wire 2023-11-30 at 8_15 PM.jpeg (1178×656) (19) Shoe on X: "A DC cop working the protests outside the Whitehouse sent me this picture. This patch is Al Qassim Brigades, a Hamas terror group. He said the guys dressed like this were spotting and assessing (which is done to collect intel). https://t.co/9ppfNs3Mrg" / X New Tab (16) Sputnik on X: "🇪🇺 "Currently, over 800,000 Ukrainian men are in Europe. They illegally escaped, violating Ukrainian law," said Estonian conservative MP Jaak Madison, proposing to extend Zelensky's mobilization beyond U... Get full access to The Last American Vagabond Substack at tlavagabond.substack.com/subscribe

You can literally scatter this stuff like dust or embed it into a sheet of paper. This was commercially released 10 years ago. It's a tiny computer and it features data processing, data storage, wireless comms, and it's probably as close to the true smart dust vision from the early DARPA days as would come so far. They're designed to harvest energy from the environment around them and to communicate via mesh network. Welcome to the Daily Wrapup. A concise show dedicated to bringing you the most relevant independent news as we see it from the last 24 hours. Saturday, January 20th, 2024. Thank you for joining me today.

Well, I apologize for being a little intermittent in the last so many days. I've been dealing with, as I let you know before, for those that live in places where it snows all the time, you probably make fun of me. But we have had some, you know, I think it was about six or seven inches of snow here in Tennessee. and it was essentially forcing me or rather choosing to stay at home in order to be safe and so on, but also just because it's difficult to get out. But in the process, there's been a lot of outages. And I forget the reasoning behind it, freezing lines or something like that. But the point was it's been wildly intermittent here.

As you guys saw last time, I was live. It dropped out in the middle of the show. So unfortunately, I'm still going to do it from here today. probably tomorrow I'll go back to the office, but just a heads up. Today's show, I can almost guarantee. I hope it doesn't happen. But I'm all day the same thing. It's been kind of on and off.

I had to get a show out today. So just bear with me. If we do lose connection, just stay on. I will bring it back, no matter how long it takes. So just make sure you, you know, stay with us. Now, today is an important show because obviously there's a lot that I haven't gotten to. And actually, a really important follow-up that I wish that I had during the last. show. And today in general, it's going to be a long one. I'm not going to try to shorten this.

I'm going to take my time and go through all the stuff we need to get to. It's probably going to be a longer show. I'm going to start with the internet of nano, internet of bio nano things, which is really concerning. And it's not a new sentiment or topic. We've discussed this before. It's about a new study that I saw Orwell shared with me for a post from Amazing Polly. And it's a really, really alarming development that's pre-COVID, but that is exactly what we've been concerned about. And I mean, to be honest, if you pay attention, these things aren't secret, even though it's conspiracy theory to the average person, but it's stated in public research, their scientific documentation.

So it's not that the actual idea in and of itself is, you know, bombshell news, but it's how this overlaps with what we've already been covering and just how incredibly in alarming. and invasive all of this is. And it's really about turning your body into the communication system and utilizing your body's own natural processes to communicate with the nanodivises to with other outside, you know, I mean, device is the best word, but you know, installations, locations, as well as actual controlling of your body and your body's processes.

It's all right in the documentation. It's terrifying to me. So I had to follow up on that. But we are going to get into a lot today. I'm going to talk about an interesting overlap with the Patriot Front again. I just saw them marching and I wanted to make a point about that. We're going to talk about Yemen and an amazing article written by Robert, as usual, and follow up on what has happened since we've discussed that topic.

And some other points I think are really important. An overlap of Iraq and Syria, but both topics to be discussed in regard to Iran and how important this really is. And likely not for the reasons that. many, you know, two-party illusionists may think. And we're going to talk about in general to the latter half of the show about Israel and Gaza and a lot of the developments there. Very prominent pro-Israel accounts being censored on Twitter. And I think I understand to know why. And I'm going to show you what is being allowed, what's being removed. It's a really important catch. And it was, it's been deleted, but we have it on the way back machine, a post by an

Israeli government representative saying something that's outland. We'll get to it all. And we're also going to talk about a lot of other developments, something Dan Cohen broke, which is a, and Jerusalem Post seems to be covering it, but apparently nobody in the corporate West media wants to talk about the fact that Israel gassed, using poison gas and a hostage in Gaza, the mother is now calling attention to this saying he was poisoned, and you guys are hiding that information, and nobody talks about it. And it's incredible.

When the first, it shows you that they're using poison gas in civilian areas, but also that they continue to kill their own hostages by the very process they claim is meant to save the hostages. It's absurd. And we have a hell of a lot more to get to than just that. So make sure you stay tuned today. And again, if we drop out, please just hang with us. We'll come back as soon as possible. And again, that's because of the internet connectivity issues here.

So I'd like to start with a, I really, really want this to get more attention. It's so frustrating to me how this topic seems to just get disregarded by so many people. And I don't even mean that in a, like a nefarious way. There's a lot going on in the world. But my God, this was an important interview. you. Scott C. Smith and I had a discussion on the six, excuse me, the 18 entitled EPA and Norfolk Southern continue to hide East Palestine's dioxin poisoning. And it's almost like the story has become so common that it's like you hear the story that, well, they're still getting sick.

And they're like, oh yeah, wasn't that the story a month of a year? Yeah, but that it was a month ago and a month before that and a month before that. And it is still that story today. And not only that, it is getting worse. After a year, people are getting sicker in this town. And not every single person, and that's the good news he talks about. It's not all encompassing. It's not the entire area where there is some good news to what he's finding. But it is very clear based on his 22 different visits to this town and all of the testing that, oh, and the results by the way that align with what Texas A&M found, what multiple other independent testers found like Andrew Welton, as well as the fact that there own team from the CDC went and seven half of the team got sick with the symptoms you'd expect if

they were suffering from dioxin poisoning as well as the mixture of the other issues that are there that they're still pretending don't matter it is absolutely blowing my mind how important the story is and just nobody seems to talk about it so scott smith is going to be following up and we get into a lot by the way a really important follow up in regard to all the stuff that i keep telling you This was just the one we, the interview we had from June 6th, but these topics, the confirmation from Scott, who is an expert in this field, that not only are they still continuing to get sick and that the testing, as I'll just start with this one, is unreal. This was on the 2nd of July from 2023, 14,000. That's not a typo percent more dioxins being found in the filters of people's homes than in the general control level that even the, what it's like I think he said was six parts per trillion. That's the control that you'll find in the background, which, by the way, shouldn't be there.

That's because your government doesn't care about your health. It's ubiquitous around our country like glyphosate, but 14,000 percent more than that in their filters, in their homes, a year later, or on July 2nd. And it's nothing on top of the fact that we also know, and we can prove this because it was in the hearing and he confirmed this as well that it was not a controlled burn. It was an uncontrolled burn. And that it was unnecessary. He confirmed for me that, yes, and I didn't need this because we already had. have the data coming from their experts, but Scott himself confirmed that this was treated vinyl chloride. And even more importantly, and this should be huge, he confirmed for us on the

record that they knew, I forget the term he used, but that the actual material that this vinyl chlorant was already cooling down. And yet they hid this information from the volunteer fire chief and then pressured him to make a choice knowing he would choose to do the thing he thought was right without all the information. They made that happen. Now, the real question is why? Why did they want that to happen? Why did they race the train? It could be money, certainly possible. I quite frankly think there's something much more dark, much, much darker happening here.

But they got the train out of the way. They even laid tracks back over what was there only to dig it back up. And the point is that they're still sending this material all this time later to places we can prove that I can prove because of my work speaking to them on the record that they don't have the capability to even deal with the oxens. most of the places are burying this stuff. This is guaranteeing this will spread to other states all across Ohio. I mean, guys, this should be the story of the Senate. Anyway, I just hope you guys will follow this up. Help me get this in front of people.

This is important. And Scott's going to continue to do more work. And on top of all of that, he's being hounded and censored and seemingly almost threatened. It's not the right word, but almost taking action that's meant to make him feel like something's going to happen from the EPA. And from, basically they're working with the whistleblower group of this. It's all, all the information is in here. I forget the name of the group up the top of my head. But it's a group that they're trying to FOIA request the information.

They're trying to call this out as well as the fact they're calling for other whistleblowers to step up. Firemen that are out there. Good people at the EPA are only starting to realize what's going on there. Speak up, reach out to myself, to Scott, to anybody. We need you. people in East Palestine are still suffering. I just find that impossible to believe. But then again, hey, Flint, Michigan still doesn't have clean water,

but I guess we just don't care about these things because two-party paradigm, right? Two-party politics, Trump and migration and immigration, all the wedge issues, let's ignore the immediacy of all the problems that actually matter. But, you know, whatever. So then I'll include the Clean Harbors waste disposal, which he confirms yet again is a huge scandal that they use these companies every time. they don't care about your safety or your health. Now, let's talk about in this segment,

but kind of a couple quick points, overlap COVID-19, you know, the kind of overwhelming obviousness of what's going on regarding the injections and the heart attacks of malchroditis, but how this relates to what we just talked about yesterday. And that's actually included this because of somebody tagged it down here, but we talked about this,

or not, excuse me, not yesterday on the 16. Gain of Function's newest brain virus, and I put that in quotes, and genetically engineered proteins to control, well, everything. And this is not hyperbole, guys. This is exactly what their science is leaning. Even if you think it's some kind of forward leaning in the next 50 year, it's still what they're telling you. And I quite frankly think they're long past that. I think this has been on the table and actionable for a long time.

And if you really want my honest opinion, as I know you're here for, I think it was involved with the COVID-19 deployment of whatever they gave people. That's my personal opinion. I see everything lining up far too well. But you guys please come to your conclusions and hear me. I'm not stating that I can prove that, just my opinion. Now, Chief Nerd post this yesterday. Increasing, he's just reading, by the way, directly from this article, which is hilariously stupid. 18-year-old dies of heart attack at Coaching Center.

Why are youngsters experiencing cardiac arrest and tips to prevent it? We're baffled, guys. It's always hashtag baffled. That should be the immediate point. Put that out there. We know what you're talking about, right? Oh, and by the way, just in a quick shout out. I haven't, I've been, you know, all the other reasons of everything is going on.

Make sure you don't miss this. I gave it a shout out with his last article. But right now, Derek is talking and John Bush are talking. They're involved with the greater reset, the greater reset, and discussing actual solutions. Make sure you check that stuff out. And by all, and I should say, by the way, since I'm mentioning it, I'll include this for you guys. Derek is about to go,

oops. At the end of this month, probably I think in next week or at the end of this month, going to San Francisco to cover what we believe and hope will be the culmination of the fluoride trial. Even though all the data is already public

and he's already broken it all for you, fluoride's hurting people. They know this. Their data shows this. They've just been keeping it from people's view. We're basically trying to fund the trip in regard to airline hotels and what he's going to be doing there.

you know, if you find, if you think it's important, all this is going to be going to this specific trip. So please help if you think this is important. I frankly think this is monumental. Include that for you guys. Now, Chief Nerd shares this, and this is what the article says in regard to or baffled about an 18-year-old dying while exercising. It says increasing instances of heart attacks, especially among gym goers,

have ignited concerns about the vaccines, myocarditis? No, none of that stuff. the level of awareness among fitness enthusiasts regarding the appropriate amount of exercise. Are you kidding me? I mean, I almost laughed out loud when I read that. Like, of all things, I mean, it's like a no-brainer. Are you actually, it's like, okay, it's like when you try to think of a good example, like when you're weightlifting, right?

Do you blame the weights when you pull your back out or is it because of, you know, I guess that's not the best analogy. The point is all you're literally aiming at is the exercise. Well, exercise by itself, I guess, could be the. the only reason. But no, I even take that back. It's the same way we misunderstand how health works. If you're out there exercising, even if you go way too far, your body is its own limit

for the most part. And I guess maybe you could push to some breaking point. But if you have a heart attack, it's usually because there's something else there, that was a problem. And the exercise was simply the catalyst that caused it. Not just that you exercise a lot. And if that was the case, we wouldn't just see this weird spike all. of a sudden. Are we pretending that people only start exercising more post-COVID? I mean, it's just

such a mindlessly brain-numbingly stupid thing to do. We all see it, seemingly everybody, including people that no longer take these shots, who swore that we were supposed to, but that don't take them anymore, even though the government tells them to, we all see it. They're just much more quiet about it. The point is, my God, people are dying, getting myocarditis, having heart attacks, having thrombosis, having blood clots, all because of this dangerous gene therapy that they gave people that, quite frankly, what we're getting into next, I'm telling you, is overlap. And I think that whether this was the large test or this was setting up for something else, we'll make all these points today, we have many times before.

But my God, I just can't, I hate to laugh at it because it's so serious. It's an 18-year-old dying from a heart attack while exercising. An 18-year-old. Now, it says, according to medical experts, while regular exercise is undeniably crucial, there are inherent risks associated with it that cannot be ignored. Again, that's not even a fair, accurate statement. The inherent risks are what we all already know. Pulled muscles, you could have heat exhaustion, you know, whatever else,

but not a heart attack just because you work out too hard. I'm telling you, I would argue that that's near, there's something else that caused that, not the exercise. In any case, this is just stupid. Doctors have explained individuals who exercise intensive regimens without proper guidance. Ah, it's your fault, 18 year old, for not doing it right. Can you believe they went that far? It just, it really gives me a physical reaction. That's, it's borderline hatred for the people that are willing to push this without, while they know damn well that that's not what's causing it. I mean, it's almost unscientific, right? These are health people that would know better. Anyway, the point.

point is somebody posted this Pfizer, Trump hugging the vaccine, right? I mean, come on, guys. We got to stop praying this game. He didn't force it. Well, it doesn't matter. And frankly, he did. It's just a word game.

But overall, it's just so obviously not a, it's your government doing this to you. But Patricia posts this with a link to the time and where I discussed that specific part. But let's talk about this. The gain of function's newest brain virus was the, It was a recent, I didn't include the link. It's in this show itself, but a new gain of function work that John Campbell covered

where it's gain of function. There's no denying this. It's obvious. They used a variation of a coronavirus to make it dangerous, infect humans. And apparently it caused like 100% mortality and caused these very weird anomalous brain issues and brain viruses. What else is doing that? Well, whatever the hell they gave people during COVID-19.

I think that there's something more to that. I think it overlaps with, and again, just my gut feeling in my opinion with what we're going to talk about next and what we talked about in this show. The weird biosurveillance relayed information, the opening clip. I mean, there's something going on here that I think they're failing to achieve or don't care of it hurts people to get there. And again, this is just one part of it. Like, it could very well be the most important and the only thing they care about, but don't take this as this somehow challenges other theories of it. about other things that have happened, origins and so on. This could very well just be one part in a large, multifaceted story.

Now, we just talked about this, is one I was going to include, the human brain cloud interface. Now, this is from 2019, same year of what we're going to talk about here. Next. So I just want you to realize that this is something that's new, it's not new, it's on the table.

They've been pushing this. And this overlaps with Elon Musk, right, neuralink, all of this stuff. This has been something they have near desperately reaching at for a long time. The technology suddenly is possible, but what they can't seem to achieve, as Whitney Webb is discussed, is even like on the AI side of things, they just can't figure out how the map the human brain. So how do you figure that out? Now, I'm going to come back to this and again in a minute because it's important, but we've talked about this, or not this here. Oh, I guess it is next.

or it's coming up here in a second. We've talked about this where they've openly stated that should they decide that they need to map the brain because it's in the interest of human society or are the preservation of our species, well, they should do it without you knowing because you won't understand. I've said I've made that point many times. It's publicly stated that multiple studies behind it. There's another one that gets into. I'll wait to show you this next.

The point, though, is that this is something that they would achieve. Like, I mean, they've talked about putting lithium. the water because people are bad or actions to stop climate change without you without your permission or self spreading vaccines because who cares about informed consent when it's the best interest of society they keep using this argument and we keep questioning whether they'll do it again right so this was about your brain for the podcast the human brain cloud interface connecting with the cloud now what's scary about this just in its basic element these things go both ways now of course they always pretend well no no

it's, you know, there's protections and we won't share your personal information. But how do we know ultimately what happens here, right? You tap into this cloud and all of a sudden your internal information is suddenly, you know, this is, we have to think about how this works, or at the very least something like that. Now, Amazing Polly shared this. This was on the 18. While we were sleeping, she says, this is what the telecommunications and satellite people were doing. Intra-Bionets.

Now, that's the term to remember. That's what they're calling this. I didn't want to include that in the title today because I don't think people would understand what it is. But as she aptly writes, control slash communication between human body and satellites. Now it goes way, way beyond satellites, which I know she understands. This is the idea of nanotechnology. Now, that's why I play that clip to start. And I'll play it again once we get to it in a second.

So you don't miss it. Just the clip about what we're really talking about here. Smart dust. And when he says that in the clip in the opening, this is 10 years ago, that was the, posted in 2014. So that goes back to what, 2004? Oh, I see, it's right here. Nine years ago, right?

So essentially 20 years ago is when this was coming out. And I guess I can't say that without, hold on, this article, which I won't go into in depth again, but, you know, they've blatantly openly stated this in the bio-convergence document that in 2002, they said they revealed their 20-year plan to alter evolution with nanotechnology. I just find it hard not to see the overlaps. We'll come back to that video in a second. The point, though, is just realize that it's about nanotechnology, the size of smart dust, the size that you can't see it. It's dust.

Now, that could already well be in your body. That's my whole point. I don't know why we would even balk at that. It's very, very likely almost. It's real, first of all, but it's likely almost that this would have already been used in some regard. And then how do you stop it? It's self-spreading concepts, but on technological level, right? So human body, communication control, satellites, but whatever else is circulating in the air in your body,

and that is the internet of bio-nano-things. Remember, we're in what they call the internet of things, where your refrigerator, if you're ridiculous, is connected to the internet. Why you would ever want that? I don't know. I mean, I get the nuances of it to small, hey, you're out of milk. And we're also listening to everything you say and filming you while you walk out in your underwear. But, you know, your milk's low.

The point, though, is that this is what we're currently. in the next step is the internet of nanothings, right, where it's interconnected with the nanotech, but then once that's internal, or even more so, my point would be once that it's used in your body, it's already the internet of bio-nanof-nano things, but this is taking that a step further. This is utilizing your own body's processes, your own body's electrical signals, your hormones, your cells to use the way they communicate, basically hijacking it, to communicate. back out with other nanotech, with other installations, with whoever's tracking the information. Now, this sounds, this is going to sound crazy to people.

It's not a joke. It's very real. Thank you, amazing, Pauli, for sharing this. Now, here is the link she shared, first of all. Dr. Ian F. Akyldiz, interesting name. President and CTO of Truva, Inc. Now, this is from 2019.

Here's the actual document going over this. From 2019, we'll come to this next. And this is actually the microbiome gut brain axis, which we're going to talk about. That's 2019. I don't actually see a date on this. So at the very least, we know this is current because of what they're discussing. Now, she says this was written pre-2020. I just can't seem to find data on there.

Either way, I agree with that. It's very accurate. Now, this says, first of all, just right of the gate, hollow for all, holo, hollow for all. AI enabled real-time hologram type communication. So starting with what I argue is the novelty, right? Now, very useful, I would imagine, in a futuristic idea of being able to like, you know, in the whole metaverse swing of things, being able to project in a real world sense, whatever, you know, your body in a 2D hologram, that's what they're talking about.

So you can be at the meeting, but be in another country, right? But, you know, that's a novelty, I argue. I mean, I don't think, I mean, you could be on the phone, right? So this is about, it's cool to some people, but this gets into a lot of invasive stuff. How do you do that, right? How do you map this and biometrics? I mean, it, that, but that's not even the point. Just to show you what they're talking about.

A artificially intelligence enabled real-time holographic telepresence. This one says this project envisions the 6G wireless. We're already on 6G communications as intelligent communication environments. So one of the reasons that they're so desperate to. push this forward. 5G, 6G, they need this. Who cares if it hurts you? Because we know that it hurts you. Another great work by Derek Brose and a lot of others. They don't care about 5G. I don't have to play the clip.

You've seen a million times. So we're flying blind here, right? We haven't tested this at all, but let's do it anyway. They've stated this publicly. Here's the main point. This is what Polly was sharing. Heterogeneous intrabody, biomolecular communications for the Internet of Bio-Nanof-Fings. So the internet of biomeo things we just went over. This is heterogeneous intra-body biomolecular communications. I mean, my God, is this not exactly what we've been talking about?

We've been discussing the Lieber-Langer overlap, the internal biosurveillance, the magnetogenetics, optogenetics. This is exactly what we're worried about. And we just went over in this show the ferretan nanoparticle injections they're using, which are utilized in this exact way. And this is the point. they're already using these. They're being tested, if not already being applied publicly.

The pan-coron coronavirus ferretin nanoparticle injection, they've got the universal flu ferretin nanoparticle injection. These are all very real. We went over in this show. They're in multiple stages of being utilized right now. The point is, as I can just grab this one, it's an article in 2016 by the Guardian. They told it the genetically engineered magneto protein, that's ferretin.

It's basically a protein that has these different iron particles, and they can manipulate that using multiple things, light, electronics, magnets, and through that are able to remotely control the brain. And if you read this, literally remotely control the body of these animals. Think about how crazy that is. I went over this so many times. So the point, hypothetically, if we're talking about them utilizing these things and at the same time discussing where this is all going to be going to. going, just wait. So it goes on to say the goal of the Intrabionets project, foundational models of heterogeneous interbodies,

bio-molecular communication network links for the internet of biomegranate of things, that's the intra-bionettes, is to address fundamental challenges in the development of a self-sustainable and biocompatible network infrastructure to interconnect the next generation nanotechnology, the next generation, and synthetic biology enabled electrical and biological, wearable and implantable devices, i.e. the internet of bio-nanot things. Remember that even implantable devices was a conspiracy theory during COVID? While the constraints concerning the size, environmental, and biocompatibility faced by these devices greatly reduced the practicality

of classical telecommunication solutions, their direct contact with the human body where the cells naturally communicate to interconnect into networks, the way your body naturally works, suggest the possibility to exploit, I love the word, these biological communications for their interconnection. So exploiting, and we'll get into more detail in the next one, how your body operates for this communication purpose. They'll state is for your benefit, of course, as always, when it's very rarely the case ever. Now, this is in particular, the intra-bionets project focuses on the development of a foundational

of a foundational models of usable communication channels on top of the biological process processes underlying the microbiome, this is important, microbiome gut brain axis. That's what this whole thing seems to be aimed at. So clearly, the microbiome is very important to health. So now we're going to be talking about using nanotechnology to utilize this system for intercommunication and internal and external bio-surveillance and relaying that information amongst other connective mesh networks and whatever else is cataloging this. Gee, what could go wrong? Composed of the gut microbial community, the gut tissues, the entric nervous system, your intestines, and their intercommunications,

drawing from cutting-edge research in physiology with the aim to realize minimally invasive, heterogeneous, and externally accessible, that's important, electrical molecular communications to transmit information between electrical and biological devices. I mean, it's very clear. It's very, very, very clear. There's no way you can call this conspiracy theory.

This is real-time work that I quite frankly, think that's already being tested. We're talking about using the internal system of your body, hijacking it, essentially, pirating it, if you will, to be able to communicate between the electrical devices. Now, that also means, like we're going to talk about in a second, the smart dust. That's the nano side of it, not just some refrigerator, right? It says the outcome and then with biological devices. devices. Now, what's funny about that is that it can either mean a device internally,

which I don't even think you can call that a biological device, that I frankly think that just means human beings. Devices, though, or in the age of technocracy, right? Transhumanism is the real point. The outcome of this proposal will establish the basis for a completely novel transdisciplinary networking domain at the core of the next generation biomedical systems for pervasive, perpetual, and remote health care. My God, I mean, that's right on the nose. They're talking about the health care aspect of this. Quite frankly, it goes way beyond health care, but that's what they're framing it as,

the next generation of biomedical systems for pervasive, perpetual, and remote health care. Is that what you're asking for? To accomplish this goal, the Intrabionets project brings together an interdisciplinary team of PIs with expertise in molecular communication and nanonetworks implantable microelectronics engineering and biological communications modeling and design. Terrifying. So here, this is the microbiome gut brain axis, and exactly like they discussed, as a biomolecular communication network for the internet of bio-nanot things, 2019.

Right before this all started. wonder what they were doing and testing, right? I mean, I'm not trying to insinuate that too hard. It's just my opinion, but I kind of feel something about this. You know, I think that's important. Share with you. Now, in the abstract, first, it says in the development, and this is what we're talking about,

of a self-sustainable and biocompatible network infrastructure to interconnect the next generation electrical and biological wearable and implantable devices, which they're calling that just summed up right there, the internet of bio-nano-things. It's very clear, I hope. The direct contact of the internet, which this is the little acronym to remember, I-O-B-N-T, internet of bio-nano things, which, by the way, is interesting that it's,

you would think that, as I said a second ago, the internet of nanof-things, and it's kind of the same thing, right? But the fact that it's explicitly about connecting these two things is just, it's very on the nose. It's transhumanism. Why would we need to mesh these things? You could just have nanotechnology and choose to utilize it, right? but it says the direct contact of the internet of nano, bio-nanothings devices with the human body,

where the cells naturally communicate and organize in a network suggest the possibility, I think the same as before. The aim of this work is to investigate, I think it's all pretty much the same, minimally invasive, heterogeneous, external accessibility to transmit information between these devices through your microbiome gut brain axis. To your brain, I mean, this is so mind-blowing to me. composed of the gut microbial community, the gut tissues, we just read that, a framework to develop the network infrastructure on top of the biological processes.

So I just want you to really hear what they're saying. For those that might not think they're utilizing your natural processes to piggyback, essentially, to be able to send information to communicate control, underlying this microbiome gut brain access, and the intercommunications among its components is proposed. To implement this framework, the following challenge, just need to be tackled. First, physical channel models should be developed to quantitatively characterize electrical and molecular communications through the microbiome gut brain axis. Second, novel technological solutions. Now, think about this. This is 2019.

Right. So these are what we need to deal with. Physical channel models to be developed. How do you do that? Well, you deploy something. That's physical. But I'm not saying this is necessarily what happened. But we need to ask what. that this is what 2020 was all about. Second was novel technological solutions and the information modulation, coding, and routing should be developed. Well, I keep talking about this

that we come to the place where the technological advancements meet what their planning was. Maybe this already happened. Third, to support these efforts with experimental data. A first of a kind, implantable microbiome gut-brain-axis network probe device composed of a hub connected to an ensemble of electrical and molecular stimulation,

and sensing modules should be designed and engineered together with an innovative gut on a chip in vitro model system. Right. So don't think of this as some big device. This is a nanotech concept. So my point is, if you want to ask the question, it very well could have been something deployed in these shots. Just hypothetically.

I know people, even though that's clearly a possibility, no matter how abstract, even just floating that as a possibility, people call conspiracy theory. It's not a conspiracy theory. It's a hypothetical possibility. And you know damn well that it vary with something that is possible. Now, it says the discussion in this paper establishes the basis for a completely novel transdisciplinary networking domain at the core of the next generation biomedical systems of pervasive, perpetual, and remote health care. Now, it says over the last decade, the transformative concepts of information, processing, and propagation in the molecular domain have dramatically reshaped the frontiers of communication and networking research with biomedicine as a natural application field. Now, why would that be? Is that what the mind naturally goes to when you discuss what we're, you know, I'm trying with the simplest way to frame it, but like all the things we're discussing, the nanotech internal survey?

I mean, is that would you immediately go to? of biomedicine. Does that even seem to make sense to people that are outside this field? Maybe. But I just think it's, especially with the history, we just talked about the toxic toxicity of nanotechnology in and of itself, or nanoparticles, that they still argue we don't really know this to the full side effects of just

anything that small internally. And yet, we just skip right past that. Didn't know you guys could still see me. I forgot I had this up the whole time. I forget whether you guys like that better or not. I quite frankly don't mind. I think I just like the screen being bigger. For the podcast, I had the little side window up there.

So it goes on to say, as a result, nanotechnology and biotechnology enabled wearable and implantable devices with ever-increasing biocompatibility and optional autonomy are being developed in 2019. Right? So we can't pretend like this is not something that is at the very least being built, let alone, as we always point out, when they state this, it's usually been used and applied for 10 years in some military secretive concept. Nanotechnology and biotechnology enabled wearable and implantable devices with operational

autonomy. These devices promise to pervasively perpetually and precisely sense, process, control, and exchange body health parameters in real time. Now, even if that's all that it is, is that something that we want? Your internal bio-information, just constantly flowing back and forth. That's what we're talking about. When they go, no, Ryan, they promise they tell you it will be, you can choose to opt out. How often has that worked out for anybody?

Now, it says, these devices promise to, and I love the terms, they pervasively, perpetually and precisely sense process control, control. that don't miss that, and exchange body health parameters. Now, when you say you can control body health parameters, there's no misunderstanding that. So this could very well be used as a weapon if you really wanted to. Dual use tech, as always, and allow remote interrogation. It's all pretty simple and clear,

which we classify under the paradigm of the internet of bio-nano things. Of course, the average person doesn't want to believe this, will tell you're crazy for considering that these good people fighting for your health, whatever, do that. Now, I'm not, we should, the main point should be, it's very rarely, but we saw during COVID that it can be that with the people involved with the research, the barracks of the world, the, the, yeah, um, uh, Dazaks of the world are sometimes the ones doing this are the ones part of it, but usually the scientists aren't usually the ones that make this a problem.

It's the military and the government and that, the way they apply it. So either way, the simple tech, the possible, the technological possible is there. It's technically possible. We shouldn't be okay with that. This paradigm will enable accurate sensing and control of complex biological dynamics in the human body and eventually, and right, control and relay. And eventually be the basis of the next generation biomedical solutions for unsolved clinical problems, whatever that may be. The baffling heart problem, you know, whatever they want to apply to. The Internet of Bio-Nanato Things is envisioned to be a heterogeneous network of electronic and biological devices.

Right. So that's like the mesh we're talking about of your random devices, your internal and implantable nanotech deployed inside and outside of the body as shown in this figure. Now, I put one of these in the front, but this is some terrifying stuff. Like, you just really understand what they're showing you here. This is the engineered immune system cells engineered. So this is where you start to realize that you're getting well past the idea of, you know, flirting with transhumanism and quite literally turning yourself into something that's no longer considered human, technically. When your own, your internal cells they're using are engineered themselves.

Now it says communicating through different means ranging from electromagnetic waves and coupling, electrical and mechanical stimulation to molecular communication. Electronic devices comprise implantable and wearable electronic devices, such as brain implants, pacemaker, smart watches, all the big clunky things that they think you know about. Again, maybe that's what they think, but realize we're way, way, way past that, which I'll play for you in a second. It says whereas biological devices comprise manipulative,

this is the thing we were talking about before. your body is a biological device, comprise manipulated natural cell and tissues. So I guess you could argue that they're talking about whatever biological parts of you that they've essentially taken over and engineered. So those then become the biological devices that comprise what they're saying are manipulated natural cell, so your body's cells and tissue, or man-made synthetic ones.

to now they're bioengineering, which we know they're working on, your internal cells and giving you those instead with all God knows what other things. I mean, this is just so far beyond what most of our minds can even grasp, such as engineered immune system cells right there. And so now they're telling you, don't worry, your immune system's been destroyed because of COVID. No, it's because the vaccines you took that destroy your immune system. So here you go. We've engineered you some immune cells because everybody's struggling from the problem that we are baffled by. No, this very well could have been the entire point. Engineered gut microbes and artificial cornea.

Now here, just in case you have missed it thus far, explicitly stated. What they're talking about is artificial communications between wearable and implantable devices and nanotechnology that are realized by exploiting natural biological communications. in the body, exploiting what your body's natural processes already are to gain what they're trying to accomplish. The focus of the conceptual framework introduced in this paper will be, as we showed you, the microbiome gut brain axis, where electrical signals propagated through the nervous system are converted to molecular signals that influence the gut microbial communities and vice versa. So what do you think could possibly go wrong by, I mean,

I can't think of a better word than what I've already used. I'm trying to think of one that's more scientific, but you're hijacking the nervous system, which doesn't mean it stops, so they're arguing it still functions, but they're using that system to be able to relay this information. I mean, I can't even begin to understand what that might do. Look at what they just did with these COVID-19 injections and wonder what they're going to do when they start hijacking your nervous system with some ferretin particles in there. Think about what we already talked about.

The information propagates by means of natural communication. links and interfaces, which are present in the nervous system. So you're already your natural system. The endocrine system. So think about that. We've talked about many times. Now, I don't even begin to understand what this, how this might actually play into it. But we have to remember, we have been overwhelmed with endocrine disrupting

in chemicals. Overwhelmed. Glyphosate. I mean, everything we've talked about, all these, it's, it's, our bodies are being bombarded with things that are 100% affecting your body's hormone system. And then I simply asked that this, this was the focus at the time on June 11th, about the, I mean, interestingly, damn quiet conversation now about transgender, right, is they all quietly backed away from whatever the hell they were trying to, I mean, it's crazy. We, I will revisit this at some point. And how we have to go back over how alarming It still hasn't stopped, mind you, but all the push that's great. Anyway, the point is, was it causing gender dysphoria?

And the question is, yes, we can't know for sure every time, but scientifically, the scientific studies that the same group screams that you trust the science says, yeah, of course it can. And then we're being bombarded, the COVID injection included. As I said that, here's the one with Dr. Peter McCola, who makes this exact case that the injection, the COVID-19 injection, was part of these endocrine-disrupting chemicals. He very clearly makes the point that, yes, the injection is part of that, right? So the question becomes, now back to this, is that part of the larger manipulation. Have we been bombarded with these things over the last however many years to achieve some

kind of setting? Right. We're going to talk about many things today. But here's what we talked about with George Webb back on August 6th. AI created drugs, the fake China lab, and specifically being primed with a life switch. Think about how all this stuff connects. Like, I'm terrified that this is already happening. The endocrine system and the immune system, right?

So the point, again, was utilizing all of these for this ultimate relay internet of nanonot things. The holistic nature of the microbiome gut axis or microbiome brain gut axis encompasses electrical and molecular communication domains and interfaces between them. The accessibility of this biome from the external environment through the ailmentary canal and the presence of microbial cells, which are genetically programmable as biological devices. Literally telling you, they're talking about microbial cells that they're going to be genetically programming, but natural. I mean, this is just so terrifying to me to realize the kind of stuff

that they're, I mean, this is Frankenstein stuff, makes this system particularly interesting to explore in the light of the internet of bio-nalo-things paradigm. That's what they say. A direct communication with this biome will also provide a large amount of data. Of course it will. About the health of the central and auto-autonomous nervous system, as well as the gut. Yeah, just a small byproduct. Of course, we'll be scooping up all the data we possibly can about how these things work so we

can manipulate them more. The article discusses. the utilization of this microbiome gut brain axis as an internet of bio-nanothings communication network infrastructure to transmit and receive information generated by and or directed to electronic and biological devices, where this infrastructure is also envisioned to communicate with the external environment through dedicated molecular and electrical interfaces. What's the electrical? Well, the molecular is the body cells they've manipulated, right?

Electrical, well, that's wireless data transfer through your skin. That's right there. Where have we heard this before? I mean, this is the picture I used today, guys. I mean, look at this terrifying reality. This is your body. This is your body on the point is you can see what they're talking about. You have an electronic interface.

Now, again, this is the clumsy way we perceive it, not nanotech, which is the same difference, but something that's implanted into your side. which then directly communicates with the cloud. And all that information gets relayed. And this can control this device. It can kill you. It can operate. It can save you.

It can do whatever. All this is happening internally. Now, where have we heard this before? Remember this? Particles for humanity. Right? It was Bill Gates funded. Amongst others.

This was 2019, J.P. Morgan Conference. And what did it talk about? There's Bill McGates funding. Well, vaccination tracking system for high coverage. They talked about time released particles. So you can just give them one shot and over the time it releases the extra boosters, right? But specifically, one of the solutions on patient medical record embedding vaccination information into your skin. Right.

You see these steps, and this is 2019. This is the same year that this was being published. Lastly, it says to end this, we present a methodology that comprises both analytical and experimental. efforts. The analytical effort builds on top of neuroscience. We just talked about the neuroweapons, the neuro manipulation, and it says bioinformatics to abstract and model with reliable mathematical expressions, the propagation of device-sourced information through biological tissues, utilized as communication channels, which include the modeling of one, electrical communications between devices connected through nerves in the gut muscle, the intestines, and the

autonomic systems, molecular communications involving biological devices and natural gut microbes through interactions with hormones, metabolites, and neurotransmitters, and three, the heterogeneous heterogeneous electrical and molecular communications interface between the gut and the central nervous system. The experimental effort is based on the design of a unique integrated network probe device composed of a hub connected to an ensemble of electrical and molecular stimulation and sensing interfaces. This probe device is intended to be first utilized as an in vitro environment, which is composed of an innovative gut on a chip system able to co-culture cells that compose the microbiome gut brain axis. So the point is these things can

essentially hijack other parts of your body once. deployed then an implantable version of this probe, which explores wireless power and data transfer technology to establish connectivity with the external environment. It's exactly what I'm concerned about, exactly what they've always been striving for, is to be utilized into laboratory rats to collect in vivo data on this communication. On top of these models and experiments, as part of our methodology, we introduce design elements, opportunities, and challenges to realize the aforementioned network infrastructure. This is, in my opinion, already happening.

Now, this, I'll just play this clip for you. This is important because this guy's, I've gone over this many times. This is the MakerCon. His name is Alistair Allen, the inevitability of smart dust. He starts off by talking about, where was it?

There. You know, the transition between wearables 1.0 wearables 2.0 and that's exactly what we're talking about. So all to nine years ago, he's talking about the wearables and implantables like they're discussing in 2019 as the current reality. Just think about how insulting that is. In 2009 years ago, he was pointing about 10 years before that and discussing the smart dust. So if we're discussing, why in that whole breakdown would they be discussing things like your smart watches and your implantable pacemaker? when they damn well know the Internet of Bio-Nano Things is specifically tailored towards nanotechnology.

I think it's because they don't, even from the scientific level, why would they keep that from your view? And here's just the quick clip I played. Please watch this whole thing. It's only 20 minutes long where he discusses how, and it's incredibly alarming. The point is what he's showing you here is 20 years ago. He says 10 in the video. It's a 10-year-old video. You can literally statter this stuff like dust.

or embedded it into a sheet of paper. This was commercially released 10 years ago. It's a tiny computer, and it features data processing, data storage, wireless comms, and it's probably as close to the true smart dust vision from the early DARPA days as would come so far. They're designed to harvest energy from the environment around them, and to communicate by our mesh network. Exactly like what we're talking about. Now, he goes over a lot of different discussions about the size and what can be done,

and the fact that it runs off your own body's processes. Is this not the step one to exactly what they're discussing here? So, again, right on time. 2020, 2002, their plan in 20 years to alter evolution with nanotechnology. So we talked about this a second ago. So the point is, well, their argument would be that this is in the interest of everybody's health. So we should just do it without you knowing because you won't understand. Orwell shared this with me today, moral enhancement can kill.

A interesting step. This is actually before that post, because that, that, that, that arguments have made for a long time. But it's interesting in this ad. It says, there is a recent empirical, there is recent empirical evidence that personality, personal identity is constituted by one's moral traits. If true, being, you know, being your morality or integrity, if true, it says, this poses a problem for those who advocate for moral enhancement. That's this. Specifically, in this case,

moral bio enhancement. Because this could be talking about, you know, giving somebody lithium in their water without them knowing it. That's a moral enhancement. They argue it would make you more docile or more enhanced, whatever. This is about bio enhancement. So that's about the nanotechnology or changing your, I mean, I guess you could kind of overlap the two, but the point here is they're simply saying that they're arguing your moral traits are what make you who you are. So if true, it poses a problem for those who advocate for do this, or the manipulation of a person's moral traits through pharmaceutical or other biological means. It says specifically if moral enhancement manipulates a person's moral traits,

and those moral traits constitute their identity, well, then it's possible that moral enhancement could alter a person's identity, which, quite frankly, is exactly what they want, guys. It says, I go a step further and argue that under the right conditions, moral enhancement can kill the subject. of the enhancement. I then argue that these conditions are not remote. The point that's not actual like death, but that you just don't exist as the same person anymore. It's kind of terrifying. So all of that, I think is important that we do not miss, that we are in this already. And we are

still pointing at big clunky chips and wearables when reality guys, this is already in front of us. And I am just terrified that this is already happening. And in an or just the point is, when, and they decide to pull that trigger that we won't know. Or if it does, the self-spreading concept or the idea of smart dust is not something that I argue they can control anyway, not in the sense that it would, you know, it's applicable to anybody who simply breathes it in. So let's go to the next part of this. And you may have seen this circulating. It's not actually a new story, but I wanted to make sure we went over this. Denver Health Medical Team receives Ebola vaccine.

Now, it's being kind of discussed as like people being given Ebola. It is a live vaccine. And I'll show you why that's pretty terrifying. But this is from November 28th. That's strange. Hold on. I don't really need it. But yeah, I don't need it.

I was going to refresh it to bring the highlighting back. But I remember what it was. The point is this is from November 28th, right, last year. So it's months old here. So it's interesting that it's suddenly grabbing attention. But what I think is even more interesting is the overlap, which I'll show you in a second. in a lot of different ways with Ebola and the COVID-19 conversation, disease X and all this stuff.

Now, it says a few medical employees at Denver Health in November of 2023 made history as some of the first people to receive the live, which I don't even know why that's being given in any case, any of them. Nobody should be taking these live injections anymore because it's very clear that they spread. That's undeniable at this point. The smallpox, what we've talked about, I mean, these are very real. and I'll show you in this one specifically from their own data. But it says a live Ebola vaccine for preventative measures.

But see, this is where it gets ridiculous to me. It says Ebola is a rare but deadly disease. And don't forget, Dr. Boyle, the drafter of the weapon, bio-warfare act they still use, argues that all of these are deployed weapons, that they're dual-use tech and that these, every Ebola outbreak in Africa as a stones throw away from a U.S. lab. That's his opinion, but I agree with him. It says a major outbreak in West Africa led to some cases

in the United States. Now, this was not recent. While there are no known outbreaks in the world right now, or today, not November, not today, members of Denver's health high-risk infection team said they are some of the first to receive a live vaccine as a way to prepare in the event of future outbreak. Okay. We have to start applying our basic logic, deductive logic to this. Okay, first of all, they're claiming it's because of this previous outbreak.

So they won't be prepared, right? Well, then why didn't you do it? do it right then. Why did you wait months or a year to suddenly go, well, I'm going to be prepared today. So what's the impetus for that? Did you just forget until now and you realize you should have done it the whole time? My point is, if this was the logic, and I'm not saying I agree with this, if the logic is we should do this, then they would have done this a long time ago. So it doesn't really make sense. This just suddenly gets given out, this weird spur of the moment thing to be prepared for something that doesn't even seem to be coming. Right? They're saying there's no outbreak.

indication we're having cases coming in, there's no reason to think right now this is needed or in November that it was needed. So it does very much make me suspicious. Now it says, even though there are no current outbreaks in the world, we want to make sure that people have the chance we've protected in case we need to take care of a patient that has a disease with a more time. Okay, well, then why wouldn't you give them the smallpox vaccine? Isn't the same logic? That doesn't make any sense. And most of these Ebola smallpox, they're pretty dangerous injections. They have a lot of problems, but they always argue, well, it's so deadly that the benefits outweigh the risk. Which, why not just take the time to make it better?

Probably because they can't. But either way, the point is, why don't you give them the rest of them? I don't think they should. My point is the logic is inconsistent. So it tells me that there's something else going on here. In 2014, let's see. I think it's just the bottom here. it says as for how long the Ebola vaccine lasts,

and this is an important part, it's in all the documentation, I'll show you next, they don't know. It says they just don't know how long it lasts. But they're just going to give one for now. It says right now, one. The vaccine they receive, which is Irvibo, is only available to frontline workers for now, right,

until they argue, until people clamor that we need of the, what they call that guy call it, the neuroweapons, this discussion, the worried well, right? These people will sprint in and be like, I have the sniffles. I need that vaccine. That's what you're going to start to see when they float these ideas like that. Now, here is the actual FDA documentation for this. Or Evorbo, ervibo.

They just cut to the chase. Limitations of use. The duration of protection is unknown. not even a frame, like not like for usually this money. I argue guys that this is the same kind of concern that we've seen before. I mean, I don't want to lean too hard into the unknowns here, but you know exactly our concerns about the entire vaccination, vaccination process and program.

I've been made the same point many times. At this point, I am terrified and resistant to any of it, simply because I don't trust the intent behind the people that are pushing these things out. You know, it very well could be a possibility. Should what we understand about the technology, should that be correct? We should question that. I don't know why we would take anything at face value. If what they tell us is the accurate scenario of the technology,

well, I argue that it could be applied in a way that might help some people, as long as it's a very clear choice and not pushed on anybody. But that could be wrong. My point, though, is that I just don't trust the intent. So I don't know why anybody would take these. But the problems about the lasting, there's so many issues that overlap with all these previous programs. And then it says it does not protect against other species of Ebola or Marburg virus.

So how do they know which one? Think about how dumb that is. Right. So you're literally giving them a shot for something based on something that happened that isn't very well could be a new variant, right? Based on their logic. But you give them this when there's not the reason to get like just in case that's the one that comes across. None of this is logical, just like the same with the gain of function research. And then we have transmission.

First, then we have shedding, but transmission first. Vaccine virus RNA has been detected by PCR in blood, saliva, urine, and fluid from skin vesicles of vaccinated individuals. What in the hell? Why would you ever give something that could potentially give somebody else Ebola? That's not a joke. Transmission of vaccine virus is a theoretical possibility. It says it right there. Transmission.

A vaccine virus. Ebola, what they're talking about, is a theoretical possibility. I mean, I just don't even understand that. And then here's the craziest part. Shedding, which, by the way, is the same point with any other live vaccine we've talked about. The percentages may vary and why we would trust what they say anyway is beyond me. Shetting a vaccine virus. And for that same point, by the way, question whether this is all lies.

Maybe this is not even real. Some people that are talking about the virus terrain concept would argue that all this is probably some ploy to push whatever. So question all of it, right? But nonetheless, this is that we talked about many times. David Martin and I had the same point. We both agreed on the idea arguing from within their narrative. So they have this stated. This is what they put out as the current information about what they're giving.

So whether it's real or not, think about how mind blowing it is. that it can state that you take this, you could give somebody Ebola and they give it anyway. It says shedding of vaccine virus into the urine or saliva was evaluated in 359 participants enrolled in eight different clinical studies who were vaccinated with specifically herbivbo or lower dose formulations. Vaccine virus RNA was in fact detected as it said up there in urine, saliva, and some participants at time points ranging from day one through day 14 post-vaccination. Now, that's PCR test. So that very well could be completely ridiculously wrong.

But in any case, my point is, this is what they have stated as the reality. And they're giving it anyway. It says in the three studies that assessed shedding at day 28, no samples tested positive. In study 6, 31.7 percent, 31 percent of participants, 12 months through 17 years of age, 12 months through 17 years of age, 12 months. My God. enrolled in this sub-study shed vaccine virus in saliva following vaccination. So you have examples of tests where it didn't, but 30% in one of them. Viral shedding was greatest on day seven and declined thereafter, with no shedding detected at day 28.

Vaccine virus RNA was detected by PCR at the same point. I just think that's wild. Now, of course, when you read this, it's all the same points we made from all the rest of them. So should this eventually become something they push, it hasn't been tested on pregnant people, It hasn't been tested to find out if it's in the milk of breastfeeding women. It hasn't, you know, immunocompromised or death are all the same things we talk about. It's usually how this works. And yet, when it becomes a problem, they'll push it on pregnant people just like they did with COVID-19.

I hope that does not happen. Now, I'll also include the FDA page, which is all the links, just, you know, the broad page you can look after yourself. And this is where I find that situation. So overall, my concern of that is just the fact that it's happening, the fact that it's obvious that it could get other people sick just by using it and then very well could then become something they utilize to push everything we're talking about today, including the new nanotech microbiome control system. Either way, that's alarming. The question then becomes, is it something that is just a reflexive reaction by somebody trying

to gain attention or that they think it's the right thing to do? Tough for you to decide and time will tell, unfortunately. But I think all of this is the way we should be looking at this and concerned about it. Political Bee shares this. Chancellor Jeremy Hunt on stage with CEO of Pfizer, Albert Borla, at the 2024 World Economic Forum Manual Meeting. Of the next pandemic, we don't want to have to wait a year before we get the vaccine. And if AI can shrink the time it takes to get that vaccine to a month, then that is a massive

step forward for humanity. So perfect. So artificial intelligence used to create the next thing. It's now that's by the way overlap with the. platform discussion. So all of these things are going into rapidly away from what even the classic system from before, which was wildly flawed, just like we're talking about, but with less testing, with less control, which is mind-blowing.

But the platform system, we watched fail during COVID-19, there's still you with the illusion they're in, they're still using it. They're still mapping on the same platform system with the modified RNA. All these new shots are in the works. I mean, Biden even said he's got like something like eight or ten. different COVID injections being worked on. Why? This is mind-blowing.

What he's talking about, though, is we'll also use artificial intelligence to rapidly push these out even faster. I mean, it's crazy. And again, we just talked about this in August 6th with George Webb. AI created drugs. And the being primed with a life switch. We also talked about on October 31st, 2022, the Tesla vaccine RNA-micron factories. Remember that? So Elon overlap with making these things for the future of these

platform drugs, but also the Gates funded time release micro particles. That's the thing we showed you with the particles for humanity. That all of this seems to kind of overlap in the same direction. Now, Dr. Jason Dean, I'm not familiar with, shared this, and I just think it's an interesting point. He says, I have a researcher I've been speaking with. This will most likely be next in his opinion. And they have a list of them. He says, he hope he's wrong. or he hopes he's wrong. It says it's most likely called tars, transmissible acute respiratory syndrome. Well, what's interesting is this is at the beginning of COVID-19, this name was floated.

He says, don't panic, don't get scared. These are not natural. They are manufactured gain of function bio-weapons. That seems to be the pretty predominant opinion right now. The bioweapon was created to take advantage, use the manufactured spike protein, patent attached in the study, in order to infect a genome with Marburg or Ebola qualities, along with bacterial toxins. It's chimeric and designed for a maximum fatality. We did test it already, and it's testing for at least five different bacterial-like frequencies.

Interesting. Now, I can't really confirm his statements in that, but here's the study he points to. I just think it's interesting, the timing of these conversations with the Ebola injections and how that very clearly overlaps with all the different things we've talked about all the way. even before COVID-19. Here's the actual study. Oh, I did have it highlighted, but I guess I don't know why that stopped working today. The first disease X is caused by a highly transmissible acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus.

I think I remember what it was, but it's based on the announcement of the WHO in 2018, which kind of confused me at first. What they're actually talking about is the announcement in 2018 of the hypothetical disease X. The same thing they're doing right now, find you, which, by the way, weirdly. prefaced exactly what later happened. They said because of that announcement, the Wuhan pneumonia caused by an unknown, they're talking about the COVID-19 discussion,

or rather SARS-Cob 2, should be recognized as the first disease X. Right? So in 2020, they came up and said, that's the fact, that's the Z-X. How would they know that? At the time, in June of 2020. I mean, it's interesting, right?

I think there's four knowledge. I think we're all beginning to understand. It says later the pathogen was identified to be a novel coronavirus. That's when they called it 2019 NCOV, which again, which,

oh, I think I closed it. I had the, I thought I had that open. In any case, it's that, that's SARS Cobb 2, or they renamed it,

but it says, which has, they claim, a close relation to what the SARS and from before. But it says, here we suggest

renaming in 2020, in June, what became SARS Cobb 2 as transmissible acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus. or TARS COV.

Interesting, right? Now, in any case, the point is he's saying that that's what he thinks, he's predicting that that that will be the next term that's used. Very interesting either way. Now, just food for thought. I do worry about how this plays out and the overlap with these discussions, Ebola and so on. Now, all of that, I really do think is super important.

Like what they're currently pushing, the fact that they're still using failed systems and standing on these failed systems to push the new invasive interconnected system like the Internet of nanobiobio things under the same guys. This is what's in your interest for your health and the interest of society. So far, they don't seem to hit the mark too often. Now, let's get into a quick point about the Patriot Front. And let's talk about some foreign policy here that I think is important.

This came out today. It just keeps happening. It's so ridiculous. And they're back to the FBI killers now, the khakis and everything else. Just so we understand it, I've broken this, you know, it's very possible that everyone in the group, average people believe what they're doing. But I've proven that the people in leading this are directly tied to the Ozav movement, right? And of course, now they're holding signs to say Zionists in the government. Isn't that too convenient?

Which is very real, by the way. But the idea that that's what they're. pushing because then of course they can argue it's all racism and anti-Jew hate and all the things it's just it's just it's too exact right now we've gone over this the patriot front january 6th and the vanilla isis siop all the very clear evidence the way the the police handle them or rather don't do what they're supposed to they're they're you know from taking off their mass or whatever it's or loading them back into the r the u-hulls letting them i mean all the different things we've covered show you that there's some weird dynamic going on here

But that's not even the most important part. The leaders of this movement are directly tied back to the Azov movement, which is directly controlled and influenced by the U.S. government in Israel and other groups involved. It's not even hypothetical. As I wrote in this article or this showed March 30 of 2020, not just Azov. Documents proved the CIA has been cultivating fascism in Ukraine since at least 1948, starting with the Ukrainian organization for Ukrainian nationalists, which was a fascist entity. and that is what became later on these different groups than one of them is the Ozzov movement, which is now overtaken the country. The point, that is directly connected.

Now, I'm going to show you why I think that's important. Now, this is just showing them marching around being the manipulated group that achieves whatever end they're supposed to, in my opinion, and it's very ridiculous. This says 90 to 150 people identified as the Patriot Front and recognizes a right-wing organization or advancing towards 9-11 World Trade Center. Of course, the point here, as I've shown you many times, Harretz, 2018, talking about why Israel's arming neo-Nazis. That seems confusing unless you understand what Zionism really is, right?

And this is about the Israel arming the Ozzov militia. Even more importantly, if you pretend that suddenly they're not the crazy Nazis that they used to be, well, this is 2018 when everyone in the corporate media was going, they're all Nazis, They're all dangerous. So ask yourself why Israel was arming them because this is exactly what we're showing you. This is not real. They're using this against Russia.

They're using this to achieve these exact ends, which was actually include this one too, both these. January 6th, the failed false flag meant to blame Russia and you using the CIA, Groen-Azaab Battalion, right? So if they flood these things, you know, the extremism that they want to pretend Russia's seating, they can use that to achieve their ends in this country and manipulate you and censor you as well as the other follow-up, January 6th, was always a very clear government operation, you know, from Antifa on the record going, we did it, we got him. Or this guy's

name is Sergei Binion, who is a provable in this show, we go over it, member of the Ozov movement, who is literally next to Jake Chansley here, and he's on the record in a video filming saying, let's go, let's go in, guys, go into the capital, in Russian, even though he's Ukrainian. Very clearly, this was all meant to be exactly what we lined up. it's very, very obvious. All of this connects. Israel arming them as well as Hamas, right? Israel has been arming Hamas for a very long time.

It's amazing that people still dismiss this. Here is when Harretz shared this. Two days after October 7th, and just made it very clear that this is what Netanyahu said. Anyone who wants to thwart the establishment of Palestinian state, which I'll get to later in the show, they've now been explicitly open about, has to support bolstering Hamas and transferring money to Hamas.

This is part of our strategy. They still act like that's not true. It's publicly stated. It's very, very clear. So the point is, they're arming the Azov movement. They're arming Hamas to what end? This is controlled opposition, guys. That's what we're talking about.

So the point is, and this is a screenshot somebody shared with me, thank you for catching this. They keep pushing this. right now. Only a matter of time. Only a matter of times. That's ridiculous. Of course, they would missmilled until Hamas hits small town America. See, this is what the point was always about. They've just shifted away from the Ozav stuff to something else, but it's all the same entities and the same manipulation, CIA, Massad, overlap. They're telling you, this entity is going to come to your doorstep, which is ridiculous. Not in the sense that they won't do that

and say that's what's happening, but the idea that a natural, or whatever you want to call it, a group in an open-air prison in controlled occupied Palestine of 30,000 strong people is somehow going to be attacking countries. It's ridiculous.

Because it's, and don't forget, even Netanyahu's almost openly threatened that that's what will happen if they don't let him do what he's going to do. Then you see this person going, oh my gosh, we're in D.C. And look, this is an armed guy. wearing a Qasim Brigades patch, a Hamas terror group.

No, no. I mean, the idea that this is not even remotely the right statement to make about them anymore, but the idea is clearly is something that we should be questioning and how, whether it's entities that are controlled by Israel or whether it's groups that are not fighting for the Palestinian resistance. The point is, I don't buy that for a second. Are we really going to pretend that there's a member of Hamas floating around in D.C.? I mean, it's certainly possible, I guess.

But then if that is happening, we need to ask why that was allowed. Aren't they a terror group? How do they fly in? How is this, you know, or why is Israel controlling the leadership in Qatar and working with them to mediate discussions? I mean, everything about this screams that we're being set up. And I wanted to make sure we saw that as we see Patriot Front marching through with science and say Zionism in the country, Air America, where is it right there, Zionism

in the government. All of this overlaps to the same groups funded by the same people. and it's all being used, in my opinion, the war on domestic terrorism and all these floated ideas to make you think that your neighbor is the enemy. Or anybody that is currently calling Israel's genocide is suddenly a terrorist. Mark my words.

I believe alarmingly that something like this is going to be made to happen, or at the very least, a false flag entity or effort to be able to swing opinion when they desperately need it. I doubt it will work. And then lastly, on the point of Ukraine, before we finish on some foreign policy, Yemen, Iraq, Israel. I found this really interesting. Sputnik shared this.

This was on the 16th. This is a representative, an Estonian conservative, talking about what's going on in Ukraine. Now, of course, everyone's distracted by other things and not even caring about how they've just given up on the thing they told you was the only thing that mattered. And if we don't do this exactly the way we say, Russia's going to take over the world.

Oh, look over there. We're distracted now. So who cares? Okay, so you don't care that Russia is going to take over the world, or was that never true? I think you get the point. Obviously, if they thought Russia was, if we don't do this, he'll take over the world, they wouldn't just shift into another point. They lie. They lie to you about everything, guys.

It's ridiculous, just like they're lying to you about what they claim Israel is not doing right now. But this says over 800,000 Ukrainian men are in Europe because they illegally escaped. That sure sounds like a democracy to me, right? The point is, Ukrainians were fleeing because they knew they were going to be put into war, with barely enough to, they're ill-equipped, fighting a war they don't care about because this is not about anything other than control from the Western powers. Last week, we had a honor to welcome Mr. Zelensky in Tallinn, and he said very clearly, they need men.

They need more men because thousands of men had died. also from the Ukrainian side But in Well if they need more men Because they've all died Well that's not clearly Indicate they're losing That's probably why they don't want to pay attention anymore

Europe We have almost 800,000 Ukrainian men Who have illegally Breaking the Ukrainian laws Escape from Ukraine So Ukrainian men Who don't want to take part in the war

Broke the law I mean you guess you could argue The conscription or to the draft to something that used to happen, but it's pretty damn archaic, isn't it? At the very least, it shows you that this huge portion of people, probably most of them, don't want to fight for a war they don't believe in. As a cowards, and we need to help Ukraine with a toadose man and also with a military aid that they will not die in Ukraine, that they will fight for Ukraine and they will win this war.

Thank you so much, but it was an important point, I think. Right, so we're going to forcefully deport these people to go back and fight, right? Because we care about what exactly supporting neo-Nazis to allow them to continue their genocide against a Donbas people right or what stopping Russia from doing something they claim they're not doing which there's no evidence to indicate they ever will but the Gaza movement publicly states they're going to do what you say Russia wants to do as soon as they have control all of this is just so childishly obvious and I think quite frankly everybody sees through this today I've been seeing that for a long time but not until Israel's part of this with the Gaza

genocide, do people start to fully see what I'm talking about? Now, Robert wrote an outstanding article about Yemen. To simplify, make sure you read this, it's a great article. Why the U.S.-UK. attack on the Houthis, and he makes a good point. I still use the Houthis because most people don't know the Ansarala movement, but that is, in fact, the real name, and we should start using that to be accurate. The Houthis is a U.S. term.

They used to a Western term. The Houthi rebels, they use it to delegitimize that it is a realigni movement. real entity that is popular support from the people of Yemen that ultimately is that this is the government, a state apparatus. And as he writes in the article, the only state standing up as a state in the world supporting from their state apparatus, Gaza and Palestine. And so the point is that what he's saying is it was an act of war on Yemen, not some targeted attack on some rebels.

This was an act of war against the state of Yemen because they want to stop the genocide. And that's exactly what's happening. And it also shows you without question, these are some weak people you're looking at. Like, think about how alarming it is, how crazy it is to be, first of all, starving a country for over a decade, blockading it in the same illegal way

that everyone's talking about over here, which it's been going on for a decade or more. We've interviewed Hussein Albuquerquey more than once about what's going on there like years ago. But they have been attacking and starving and bombing and using biological weapons, To be specific, act hacking and doing certain things to create the conditions that cause cholera intentionally.

The corporate media couldn't care less. They don't say a peep about this. That never really stopped, mind you. But suddenly they bombed them and the media falls all over themselves to stand up and scream about how bad Yemen is. Interesting how they couldn't care about the tens of thousands of civilians being killed because of what they're doing. that she shows you how feckless and cowardly they are. But also, and I met the corporate media, but also these two people right here. Seneck, Biden, because what do they do?

Well, they said stop. And the Yemeni said, well, you stop supporting the genocide and we'll let everything go back to normal. And they had a little back and force with the Red Sea. They bombed them to stop that from happening. They say we did it, but it didn't stop them because it didn't actually stop. stop what they were doing. So what do they do in an act of just a childish frustration, just bomb the country and kill civilians, along with parts of the Ansarola movement.

I mean, it's just think about how obviously on the surface weak that is. You're using your, that is a bully. You're powerful to a degree. And that's it. So just like the classic saying, right, if you're a hammer, everything looks like a nail. That's all they have. Read it. It's an important article.

Now on top of that, Belgium cowardly steps in and joins the Red Sea operation against the Ansarola movement, the Houthis. But that's all they got. So I guess what the U.S., the U.S., the U.K., and Belgium now, because everybody else pretty much backed away? Interestingly enough, this is exactly what, how long have we been talking about this? This, guys, is exactly, I mean, in a way, and again, just like the other conversation, this is, it's never just one thing. It's always multifaceted, whether it's oil or gold or lithium or resources or geostrategic control of certain areas. War has a lot of different reasons, none of which are justified in my opinion.

But the point here is that we've been talking about, for instance, over here, this is the, on the podcast, we're showing Saudi Arabia and the kind of waterways around all the areas, the Red Sea, Gulf of Aden. And so the point is the Persian Gulf, Iran, as they've been saying for how long, they need to take over Iran, right? Because they want and are desperate to control the Strait of Hormuz, the Persian Gulf area. Because should Iran shut that down, right, which I think is probably, which ultimately I think is going to be happening, not just from Yemen side of it, but from Iran, if they keep pushing this against Iran, that dramatically hurts their shipping processes, but specifically their oil

and who whatever else, intelligence or apparatus, whatever else they would be doing in that regard. And so that's why they've been trying to do that against Iran for a long time. But then all of a sudden, they went after Yemen. I argue it was a combination of just control in all this area, but also because should they go to war with these countries,

they know Iran will shut down this area. They've already threatened that. So if they can effectively control the straight of the Bob Almond step straight over here between Djibouti and Yemen, well, then they could just simply reroute the other way, right? They tried with Oman. Oman didn't play ball. Yemen stood back.

They tried to force in their own control. They've been fighting to put in a puppet of power. His name is Hadi, but the people pushed away from, the people wanted the Elstrala movement. He's been operating out of Riyadh for however long. They still pretend like he's the old, they literally, the group that they pretend is the current government, as Robert writes about, or a bunch of Saudi people have no interest. in Yemen at all. The Yemeni people want the Ansarola movement, which is plainly evident, and yet they just still argue democracy means the guy they want.

It shows you how it's everything they do everywhere. They don't care about anything other than their own interests. So the point, they failed to take over Yemen to this point. And I'll make a point about this in a second regard to even Eli David trying to swing into this acting like, it just shows you how very interconnected this is with what Israel and everybody else is involved in. but then you also have, and you can see the triangle here, the Suez Canal, which by the way, remember, Egypt was a regime change. As Trump, Trump was my favorite dictator. Like that's the guy, Sisi was the guy they wanted. But the point is that they failed to control the actual population who is aggressively anti-Israel.

And at this point now, because of what Israel's been doing in Gaza, now Egypt and Israel's standing is very different. So all of a sudden, you see how weak they truly are in this. a situation where they do not have control of pretty much any of these locations. And they're exerting that power now. Yemen is effectively shutting down the traffic that they, this UK, US and Israel, which arguably is, you can argue morally correct based on what's going on. You could argue that they have every legal standing, especially in their own waters, as long as they're not hurting. That's the point he makes in the article as well. They haven't killed anybody. They have taken some attacks on ships, which you could argue, and I did before with Robert.

that technically that would be illegal, if you can show that they're not in any way connected to military, but I argue Israel's probably utilizing all the things they can. But then the question becomes, why would they follow the law if U.S. and Israel blatantly disregarded at every possible step, right? We still have to point it out, though, if you want to be accurate. But I think that this is going to explode,

and it's going to get worse because the U.S. government is only going to push and do what we just said they do before. they're going to just, what other option? They have force. So they're going to act with force. But realize that Yemen is an occupied territory, just like the other ones we talk about, with Saudi Arabia occupying parts of Yemen and working with the U.S.

and UAE and everybody else, which means, same point, they have the right to armed rebellion per international law. That does not change, which means they don't need to be attacked to be able to fight. They're occupied. They have the right to armed rebellion against their occupier. So when the U.S. continues to bomb,

because they're fighting. The only one in the wrong is the U.S. government and anybody else bombing the occupied. It's important. It says reports from Yemen that Houthi's plan to close all three waterways if the genocide of Palestine

does not stop. And this is what their point is. David Roth Lindbergh expresses their statement here. Oh, wait, hold on. How did that happen? Hmm, that's weird. It says, this is Yemen's message to the EU is reasonable into the point.

This is from today. It says instead of EU moving to add more fuel to the fire, they should move seriously to stop the crimes of genocide in Gaza. And then we will stop our military operations immediately and automatically. I mean, it's the same thing they're doing with the conversation of the genocide. The Hamas, and we'll get to the end of it today, they've stated very clearly. If we have a full exchange with the ceasefire, this will end.

but Israel doesn't want it to end. Well, the point was they'll give all of their hostages back, which is what Israel claims they're trying to accomplish. But as they've also stated, it's only about eradicating Hamas. And clearly that's the only thing, clearly at the expense of the hostages that they're trying to accomplish, but the truth is about as well as fully settling in Gaza.

They currently occupy it, which is the obvious reality. But they're saying in this case, so same thing over there, they're saying, look, if you just help us, stop that genocide, we will stop what you're telling us we need to stop. So why would, especially when everyone in the world, all the international organizations they usually tell you to look at are all aware of what's going on. The only groups that seem to be stopping it are the U.S., Israel, Canada.

Would you not give into this? There's something else going on here. It's not just about being right. Clearly there's moving factors here from Israel's influence. I'm not sure. But it seems pretty simple, right, until they just keep going. Now it says, Ansarala Political Bureau member, his name is Mohamed Al-Bucati, my message to the European Union countries regarding their possible participation in a military mission in the Red Sea.

The exceptional state of stability and security that Europe experienced after World War II is a result of the moral values that prevailed in its society at the internal level. However, this moral system began to weaken as a result of the participation of some European countries in the immoral wars that America fought outside its borders. We are now seeing its effects in the rise of extreme right. We are now seeing its effects in the rise of the extreme right and the war in Ukraine. So talking about in Ukraine, I would argue. European societies must realize that moral and human values are fixed and do not change

according to the nationality and religion of a person and their treatment of them with extreme selectivity that amounts to schizophrenia will expand the scope of wars in the world, which will expand to Europe. There are genocidal crimes committed every day in Gaza, the majority of whose victims are women and children in full view of the world. And all countries must take serious action to stop them. Unfortunately, the movement of some countries with their fleets in support of the perpetrators of genocide and the silence of others is what prompted us to take unilateral military action

to stop it. I mean, guys, it's pretty hard not to see how honest that is. I'm not saying that they are being honest, who knows what the true intentions are. But if that is the case, who can deny that? And quite frankly, I do believe that's what they're doing. But it says because we had no choice but to do so. We only target. The only reason people would push back on acting like this is not their true intention

is because you somehow have bought into the narrative that they're all a bunch of terrorist supporters of whatever else the narrative was, was spun for you from Israel, the United States, which I don't think is even remotely accurate. Now, with Hamas, there's a different story there, especially because of the funding that came from Israel and the reason they were using them, the fact that they were trying to mobilize the most extreme elements to use against the people that wouldn't go along with their narrative all over the world. But this is quite different.

This is a popular movement that this is the same as a Hezbollah discussion. They call them terrorists because they just don't like that they're pushing back. Now, I'm guarantee they've done things we wouldn't agree with. I can point to a hundred million things the U.S. government's done that I don't agree with. The point is they're not what they say they are. They are a popular group supported by their own peoples that are more so an apparatus of the state than anything out like a military. But it says unfortunately the movement of some country with their fleets to support this. Oh yeah, right?

This is we only target ships linked to Israel, not with the aim of seizing them or sinking them, opposite of what you get from the other side, but with the aim of changing their course to increase the economic cost. Israel, which by the way is a huge since this, as a pressure card to stop its crime. crimes and cause that allowed the entry. So basically, I wouldn't call it nonviolent because they're using violence, but not mortally. And what is the U.S. doing response? Murders people. Indiscriminate bombing for the most part, which is clear. That goes on to say, and allow the entry of food, medicine, and fuel to its besieged residence. This is a legitimate act, especially since we are in a state of war with it. If the crews of those ships had responded to the instructions of our naval

forces, they would not have been detained or bombed. It says the steadfastness of the Palestinian people and the military operations of Yemen and Hezbollah against Israel were sufficient to pressure it to stop its crimes. But the American and British support for it, which reached the point of launching an aggression against Yemen, created the conditions for it to continue committing more crimes and expanded the scope of the conflict. It's really important. What they're arguing is, and they're right, if the U.S. and U.K. didn't do anything, this would

have ended rapidly because they were not being able to bring in anything they needed. And the U.S., it still arguably hasn't stopped. They haven't got what they need yet. They're still stewing this, but the U.S. and U.K. have stepped in and opened the door to allow it to continue. They are culpable in this genocide more than specifically the U.S. and the U.K., which I'll get to in a second. I think I've got it coming up.

Well, the genocide, the South, the ICJ, they argue they're going to bring in the U.S. in the UK, which I argue they're going to threaten them like they had before. But it says, today there is a war between Yemen, which is struggling to stop the crimes of genocide and America and Britain, which are fighting to support and protect the perpetrators. It is also clear that the Palestinian people are not ready to surrender, which means that the situation is heading towards escalation. Instead of European Union countries moving to add more fuel to the fire, they should move seriously to stop the crimes of genocide in Gaza.

And then we will stop our military operations. immediately and automatically. The Palestinian people are being subjected to great injustice at the point of being deprived of the right to live on their land by force of arms. If another human group had been subjected to the injustice that the Palestinians are being subjected to, we would have moved to help them, regardless of their religion or color. Isn't that refreshing? We are not, and you know, you can argue they're not lying about that, but I frankly don't believe it. I think that's honest. We are not advocates of war, but rather advocates of peace, and it is America and Britain that attacked us, whether in 2015, exactly, indirectly or today directly,

and we advise the European Union countries not to participate in any aggression against Yemen. Our keenness to achieve a just and comprehensive peace that guarantees the safety and dignity of all peoples does not mean abandoning our duty to defend the oppressed, nor abandoning our right to self-defense. No matter, interestingly how that's what Israel screams about, but they're not allowed in their own. right, no matter the sacrifices it cost us. We are prepared to fight until the day of resurrection, even the whole world comes together against us. And of course, what Israel's doing is,

if ever, has long since been self-defense. But realize that they have been attacking them this entire time. And it says they're keenness to achieve a just and comprehensive peace that guarantees their safety and dignity of all. I mean, I think that what's interesting here, it's obvious. And the peoples of these countries, the U.S. and the U.K., want what they're stating here. That's what they want.

We see that across the world. It's very clear what the popular opinion is. And the governments, because of the undue influence by the Zionist entity, will not allow it. Now, here's a great clip. I just think it really puts it in perspective about how ridiculous it is. Well, I'll just let him say it himself. What it highlights is the extreme double standards. Here we are. The Houthis have been attacking shipping lanes. No deaths so far, thankfully.

Israel's been bombarding Gaza for the last three months. Tens of thousands of people died. Children being amputated without anaesthetic. And that's fine. No sanctions on Israel. No strikes against them. No arms embargo. But the Houthis rebel. Against the UK target, though, right? Is that not? It's because we don't care about international law or human rights. We have this rhetoric that we do, but we don't. This is absolute nonsense. and this whole conflict is exposing that. We say that, you know, the Iran-backed Houthi rebels. Well, they've been bombed by the US and UK-backed Saudi Arabia for the last 10 years.

Actually, the last Labour administration was calling for sanctions on Saudi Arabia over this for an arms embargo, Hillary Benz, somebody who's serving under Kirstama was leading this within the last shadow cabinet. So, you know, we talk about this in completely bizarre ways that spins it into this sort of thing of one side is bad and the other side's... crimes are airwashed. I mean, we've got a case in the International Court of Justice today brought by South Africa against Israel for genocide. We're not talking about that. We're talking about some interruption to shipping lanes. I mean, it's pretty small-scale stuff when tens of

thousands of people are being killed. And, you know, I don't care what adjective you call it, whether you call it a massacre, a slaughter, ethnic cleansing, genocide. It doesn't really much matter. Tens of thousands of people are being killed. And we're not talking about that. We're talking about some shipping lanes. It's perverse, really. And the rest of the world can see it. I mean, it really is hard not to, I mean, how can you not see that? You know, it's just so, you know, shipping lanes are important, obviously. But think about that and stand back and ask yourself how in the world that becomes the most important talking point. And all of the corporate media gets riled up to attack the Yemeni people while we're literally ignoring a genocide that is being called a genocide at the highest levels of power in international.

I mean, it's just so, it's just so disconcerting. And I really think people are, but at the same time, which, by the way, is one of the reasons they have been acting in resistance for so long is that finally it has grabbed the attention of the world. Now, here's what's really ridiculous, by the way, and this just shows you how clearly this is overlapped with what Israel's involved in, as well as the United States, obviously. but why in the world people like David, the rest of them would rise up and immediately, well, because clearly it's part of this agenda. He says, to all those, I stand with the Yemen,

with Yemen idiots. He's such a gross person. He says, are you aware that the official internationally recognized government of Yemen is fighting the Houthis? It's just so stupid. You know, it's also the internationally recognized government. Any of the groups they've ever worked with like Saudi Saddam Hussein or, you know, it's so embarrassing.

Or how about Guido? Do you still support Guido, Eli, David? Like, it's just like people see right through you, man. And the point is the internationally recognized government is Hadi, living in Riyadh, backed by a bunch of Saudi princes that has nothing to do with Yemen. But that's what the government's recognized. So, yeah, well, let's believe it. But here's the most important part.

It says, you don't stand with Yemen. You stand with a terrorist organization. Why? Because that's what they call them, even though, and it's funny about it, with the two-party paradigm manipulation and all of it, that they removed that state Biden removed the who the terror they're never been a terrorist organization they removed the terrorist organization label and they just randomly add it back because of what's going on the red sea and the right wing side of this is the one saying that Biden tried to hide that they're

terrorists and it's just like people just need to get past the two-party illusion but he says you stand with a terrorist organization that is murdered over 100,000 Yemeni civilians can you believe how dumb that is or so now you're literally arguing that the number of dead that is being attributed every where you look to the starvation campaign, to the siege, to the attack on their food, to the attack on the port, which is where 90% of what they need comes through. That's what's killing people. Everybody in the world is screaming about that other than the governments that should do and something about it.

And he blames that on the Houthis, on the Ansarola movement that's been fighting for them. And here's the best part. He shows you this ridiculously wrong map that I can't seem, oh, I remember I did find it. Of course, it's on Wikipedia. It's wrong. here's what it says. Houthi backs rebels Iran backed at war with Iran backed. It's just such stupid.

They support them. You know, they're ideologically aligned. And then he says, ISIS al-Qaeda right here, that tiny little spot, really? Republic of Yemen. And they're actually recognized. And he's trying to, well, look at them working with the bad guys. Well, you want to see what the actual map is? And you know this if you watch this show because I've been pointing this out since, what,

almost 10 years. Here's the actual map as of right now. Guess what? Here, you have red is the Houthis. That's all this over here. You got green and black. That is, this is essentially the al-Qaeda on the Arabian Peninsula. And then you got the Islamic State.

Well, where's the green? Oh, dang it. Let's look. Dang it. Sorry, guys. got the thing in the wrong spot. There we go. Well, look at that.

If you remove that, I remove that bomb so you can't see. You can see it there. I'll zoom in more. Okay, look. Sorry, guys. The green, which is Al-Qaeda.

There we go. Dang it. There we go. Green up here, for those of the podcast, and then green down here. That's Al-Qaeda, right? And then the purple is Saudi coalition, backed by Hadi, who is the fake president.

Do you see that that's not connected to the Houthis at all? Do you see that there's these two gigantic pockets of ISIS and Al-Qaeda that have never changed and, in fact, have gotten bigger since Saudi Arabia has taken control of these areas? Again, if you just, if you zoom in right here, there, this is, there's a Saudi block of people and control. between al-Qaeda and the Houthis. What does that show you? I should need to explain it that the people supporting the al-Qaeda elements

are the U.S. factions supporting this whole thing. And here, he has to come out with a fake map that lies about it to make you think that somehow that the red is the only part up there. They're not connected to this ISIS part. He's lying to you. Or just blindly taking Wikipedia of incorrect information. This is real-time maps,

and I've been showing you since the beginning. they're working with the bad guys. That's like they armed the Ozzov movement, just like they armed the Hamas elements. And people like this are just as disgustingly stupid and wrong because they just tow the line for whatever the narrative is. So let's talk about Iraq and Syria. Because as I understand it,

they bombed again today in Iraq. And the bombing parts, well, I guess it's sort of the Katab Hezbollah, which is they say now formally part of the PMU, but it's the PMU group. we're talking about, which, by the way, is part of the Iraqi military, which is armed by the weapons that U.S. gives Iraq. It's really dumb.

But here's the point. This is actually from the 15th. So this is what we know, to start, but earlier point. She goes, here's what just happened on the 15th and before. The Revolutionary Guard in Iran launched, which their military, launched several missile attacks tonight, on 15th, on specific targets, Iraq and Syria. According to their statements, targets were won. terrorist groups responsible for the bombing of civilians in early January in Kerman,

which I believe was the Soleimani ceremony, and Iran, and two, a Mossad headquarters in Iraq, the Iraqi Kurdistan, you know, which is the area they tried to carve out using the Kurds that the U.S. government's manipulating, right? Believe to be, well, actually, I think that back. I'm thinking Syria. Either way, the point is the Kurds working with the Western entities, and that's why I argue that they're centered there, believed to be responsible for the assassination of key access figures,

Mossad. So first of all, we've told you this a long time ago. In Iraq and Syria, Israel's operating freely in there, which is a legal in violation of their sovereignty of Iraq and Syria, that neither of them want that. And they're using U.S. passports to do it.

We had an entire show about this. So the U.S. is completely facilitating the Israeli apparatus doing whatever it wants. But it says this is very smart for a variety of reasons. I mean, show you there's more to do it and who they bombed and why. But it says Iran flexist muscle on the 15th, reminding the tractors that it was never out of the game. And this is the kind of restraint that you just do not see from the Western powers and tactical action. You know, what you see is Biden and the UK clumsily bombing and killing people all over a very dispoversed, impoverished country because they have to make it look like they're powerful.

And guess what? It still didn't stop what they were doing. But it says it did so in a way that reminds the supporters of said terrorism, U.S., the U.K., Israel, that the Islamic Republic will act with overwhelming force when directly challenged. Importantly, Iran did not enter or expand the regional war, which is what everything the U.S. and Israel are doing is striving to accomplish. It drew a deterrence line for its enemies and warned against unchecked military escalation

in its neighborhood. The U.S. announced today on the 15th that it would send 1,500 more troops to both Iraq and Syria, illegally, without consent from either state, right? because they don't care about sovereignty and they're both being illegally occupied. This is the important thing to understand. And it gets even more important when we come to the point that Iraq is, again, saying, we need you to leave and they don't care. But they care about their sovereignty.

We've heard that before. It says Iran behaved as a sovereign state tonight, something the U.S. hates to see anywhere. It defended its territorial integrity, punished terrorism, and flexed just enough muscle to warn off aggressors. Nice to play. I flatly agree. But here's where it gets interesting.

This is about the launch we're talking about of Iran strikes in Iraq after the U.S. action. It says, and Israeli action and the assassination, the bombing and everything from before that. He says Iran said on Monday, this is before the 15th, this was posted on the 15th. Iran said on Monday that its forces launched ballistic missile strikes in Iraq and Syria, that they said targeted spy headquarters and the, the gathering of anti-Iranian terrorist groups. Very interesting. I believe that means an overlap of Mossad, intelligence, and ISIS members that they're cultivated.

It says Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps said the strikes in Syria targeted ISIS members who were involved in the recent bombing and Kerman. It killed 94 people, right? And don't forget, we just talked about this. I laughed out loud about this on January 5th. It said, this is the article where ISIS claims responsibility. And the way they did so, Freddie Pontone broke down in a way that pretty much reveals that it's very uncharacteristic. And the words they used and what they said.

So it might very well just be Mossad, which by the way, it's kind of a moot point. But it says how many times exactly do we need to see ISIS attack the enemies of Israel at the peak Apostle rhetoric before we truly understand what we're seeing? And then, of course, the video down here is an old report from, uh, uh, uh, was it C-SPAN, where they're discussing this exact point, which is a very real thing, that the Israeli secret intelligence service is what they call themselves. You know, not publicly, but it's on the record. That stands for ISIS. So it's maybe too clumsy and simple for some people, but it could just be exactly what's happening.

Either way, I think it's hilarious that they jump up and they attack the enemies of Israel when even when in every possible way who they tend to attack doesn't even, I mean, anyway, the point is obviously a. Ron has been the one fighting ISIS more than anybody. That's largely why I think that they're all aimed to get. Like, it just shows you when the alignment of the agenda goes against them, when they're all working together. It's a cohesive side.

You can see it. And then they bombed these areas, and they say they bombed massad locations and ISIS locations. Then they're talking about the same thing. So right there, it seems like they're openly accusing them of being ISIS or working with them. The Revolutionary Guard said the strikes in Iraq targeted, quote, the espionage headquarters of Israel's massad in Iraq, in Erbil. Multiple missile strikes were reported in Irbil near the U.S. consulate, but there's no indication

that facility was hit. And the U.S. basically just denied it or said there's no impact. Now, it says the strikes come about a month and a half after Israel killed a senior Revolutionary Guard official in Syria on top of that. On March 22, Iran launched strikes in Irbil after in Israeli, attack on a drone facility in Kermansha, Kermanshah, Iran. At the time, senior U.S. officials told the New York Times that the building Iran

targeted did, they admitted, serve as an Israeli intelligence outpost and training facility. There's no reason in any sense that should make sense. And here's what they, this is the Tseem News Agency, Tessim News Agency. They pointed this out, or this is what they stated. This is from the Revolutionary Guard. They said in response to the recent terrorist. crimes of the enemies of the Islamic Iran, the spy headquarters, and the gathering of anti-Iranian

terrorists groups in part of the region were targeted. So that's what they're stating as well. And then, of course, on the same day, almost like it was planned, which they said before, New Jersey National Guard prepares to deploy to Iraq and Syria. That's the 1500 troops. So we're right back to sending troops. By the way, remember when I told you that we never actually left Syria. We, guys, you know, not that we need to me to tell you that, openly still stealing wheat, oil. But the point, did Trump, remember that time when they told you, oh, we, we left Syria,

didn't you hear Trump said so? It's just so embarrassing that people just blindly go along with this and we don't look back and go, oh, so I shouldn't trust him now. No, we'll just trust the next thing he says and shout at me when I tell you he's wrong. They're still there. They never left. They're still illegally occupying both these countries because it's not about anything other than control at the expense of everything.

And now we're sending more Americans from New Jersey to continue to occupy the area. And when they get bombed by whoever's bombing and response, the point is that's the U.S. government that's responsible because they're illegally occupying these areas. You're bringing troops in and making them military targets in a place where you're in the wrong in every sense of the law. There's not even congressional approval. We realize that this was a mission creep from the original deployment. Okay, now this is the report from today.

This is the biggest attack on U.S. military base in years. The U.S. military base of Ayn al-Assad in Iraq was hit by 17 rockets and smoke is coming out of the base. Thank you, too. We are hearts. She's been sharing a lot of good stuff with me. Now, the point is, guys, this is going to continue. And every time they act with military action, which, by the way, is legally an active armed rebellion under the international law for the fourth Geneva Convention because they're

an occupied territory. So you're going to continue to see these attacks. You're going to continue to see them acting in response or acting in general. And every time the U.S. government is going to say that it is a crime. They're going to say, give me one second, apologize, they're going to say that this is against the law. They're going to say that it's active terrorism, despite the fact that it is not and it's even legally protected under international law.

The same thing about Hamas. That it doesn't mean that people that commit crimes in that regard wouldn't still be crimes, right? Like so in Hamas, it under with legally invade, you know, acted with armed rebellion against Israel, which is, it doesn't matter what you think about them. It is protected under international law as an occupied territory, which is one of the main reasons they push so hard against,

deceiving you that it's an occupied territory. It still is. The point is that that's protected. But then when, when they very much did commit crimes, those are still crimes. It doesn't invalidate the original act, which was protected on international law. So all of these groups are doing the same. And the only one in the wrong here is the U.S. government and Israel and anybody else supporting these illegal actions. Now, the point here, this is from yesterday, Iraq's leader want U.S. troops out, but there's no timeline in place.

You know, there's not just no timeline. They don't care. I mean, I'll just go show you this first. Remember we just talked about this? This was in 2020. Iraqi parliament votes to expel U.S. troops. Trump sent and sanctions. That's the one thing I loved about Trump.

He just was right on the surface. We're taking the oil. Oh, yeah, you want us out? We're going to threaten you. It's like at the very least he took the mask off. You can see what they really are, which is probably one of the reasons they hate him so much. But nonetheless, he still achieved their agendas.

The point is they vote. voted for them to leave. They didn't care. They just said, well, we're going to stay, but we respect your sovereignty. You can't pretend you respect their sovereignty when you literally ignore the fact that they don't want you there anymore and you're there illegally in the first place. So now back to today, or yesterday rather, but in the same current sense, they're now speaking up again. We want you to leave. You shouldn't need to validate it again, seeing as how you already voted to have them leave and they denied it. But the point is, Iraq's prime minister has given multiple interviews in recent days, declaring his country is no, and I believe this is a person

that they pretty much put in power, declaring that this country is no longer interested in hosting 2,500 troops, way more than that, deployed there in support of the mission to defeat ISIS. Do you really pretend that's what they're doing as they fight the groups that are fighting ISIS? It's pathetic. Prime Minister Mohammed Shia al-Sudani described the U.S. presence as destabilizing in an interview with Reuters. And that's the truth. They're the reason all this is happening in this country, not because of other terrorist acts that would happen without them being there.

Their presence is the fact, and it's not because they're fighting, you know, they hate their freedom. It's because they're illegally present. It's because this represents everything that has caused all of, they are the bad guy in this situation. And that's an easy thing to state. It doesn't mean that it inherently means that U.S. bad or anything else. You could discuss that. The point is that what they're doing in this sense makes them the one in the, wrong. That's the best way to put it. Get away from the childish good guy, bad guy sentiment.

Now it says, quote, and this is what they said in response. Get ready to laugh. We value Iraq as a partner. We'll continue to consult closely with them. At this time, I'm not aware of any official request by the government of Iraq for DOD forces to depart. I'll just leave it at that. It already happened. And are we going to pretend that if they should the parliament vote again, that you're going to leave? Hardly. You already made it clear. So all this is that he's walking around going,

we want them to leave. You already voted for them to leave for four years ago. The point is, we like them and we'll consult with them. Is that it? Oh, so you don't care. Got it. You respect for sovereignty, though.

So now the U.S. strikes again. U.S. forces strike. The cuts up Hezbollah, which was part of the PMU or formally, after these attacks. Now, explain this for me. This is what's so crazy and this is what seems to,

because the point is, it's really about demonstrating, you know, making a statement whether or not it achieves anything. The PMU, or Katap Hezbollah, is not Iran. Quite frankly,

they're not even, I would argue, controlled by Iran. These, this would be like the U.S., this would be like the U.S. government attacking. Let's just use this example.

Let's say the U.S. government attacks Iraq, right? And then the PMU bombs the UK. Does that make sense? Well, they say, well, that's the U.S.-backed UK. Would that make sense to anybody? You could literally make an argument that the UK is backed by the United States.

But the point is that you can't just pretend that it is the same thing and then bomb these locations. In this sense, the PMU, I argue, isn't Iran. They're just associated. Same thing you could argue for the UK. They just would bomb the foreign country that they're working with or Germany or any other country. And they go, well, they're the same thing. Well, from a legal perspective, that's absurd. Even if they were connected, it would still not be, you know, you get the point. So here, they're bombing, and they're telling you they're bombing the PMU or Katab Hezbollah,

which is a group that is part of the Iraqi military of the location they currently control. So in the same sense that Israel's bombing the Palestinians, and that violates their occupation, or that, you know, they have an obligation to protect the civilians. They're doing the same thing here because they are killing civilians when these happen in most cases. So in any case, they bombed a part of the Iraqi military because Iran bombed their locations that they're near, which were actually illegal locations to control by Israel. That's how backward and ridiculous this is. Now, I will follow up on this.

I guarantee it's only going to get more ridiculous unless they acknowledge what they're doing is wrong, which I find hard to believe. So it's going to come down to the other actual. like the groups, the entities in Europe, other groups that are usually on their side to just finally recognize politically this is a disaster and stop them however they can. But on top of that, Israel's desperate to swing this into just about any, you know, they're trying to draw in the U.S. even more. They're trying to make this a multi-front war so everybody forgets about what they just did and are continuing to do. That's what I argue, my opinion. But this is the sprinter shared this, the IDF chief of staff telling his soldiers,

in the north to prepare for war with Lebanon. And is Lebanon actively trying to achieve? Well, first of all, they're occupying parts of Lebanon. So quite frankly, again, they have a legal right to fight for those things whether or other attack. But the point is, this all started after they were committing genocide in Gaza. And so what they're saying is because they're actively fighting. And by the way, they've already bombed in Lebanon.

They've been attacking them. Israeli bombs have hit in Lebanon and even killed a Reuters journalist. But they're saying, we're going to go to. war with Lebanon, which, by the way, Israel by itself will be destroyed in this, obviously. So they're desperate to make this something bigger. The goal is to return 230,000 settlers who fled, Hezbollah attacks. They want these settlers who are in illegally occupied territory to be able to go back to their illegally occupied territory.

Anyway, Lebanon, Iraq, Syria, Iran, Yemen. I mean, it's like they're desperately seemingly trying to make this happen. And here's Syria. This is from today. Iran's news agency, Merr News Agency reports that two senior advisors in the Revolutionary Guards have been killed as an Israeli strike on Al-Mazaya neighborhood

in the Syrian capital, Damascus, in the civilian populated capital of Damascus. And apparently they killed parts of their military. Now, why is that a legal strike? Like, this would be, again, trying to make an analogy about this. So if you're arguing you're at war with Iran, which, by the way, you've never declared that,

Now, there is a legal process to this, but you're saying, oh, this is part of their military, right? We're going to bomb a civilian location. Well, by that logic, if there is Israeli massad or just like Israeli government-connected entities or even just IDF members, which we know overlaps, there's a member of Congress in the U.S. That's an IDF member. Remember, he showed up in his uniform? So by that logic, Iran could bomb wherever he is anywhere in the United States and claim, oh, bad guy. it's his fault, human shields. Do you see how rapidly their narrative is disintegrating even to people that are following it?

They can't get away with stuff like this and they have been for a really long time. You can't just scream Iran bad guy. Iran's allowed to be in Syria. You're bombing civilian locations. Just like when they bombed Soleimani, Trump and Israel in a airport under a guise of diplomacy. Now, let's see. what we'll get into, we're at two hours. We're looking pretty good to finish with the mostly focused on Israel.

Now, this is actually pretty crazy to me, talking about the free speech platform, right? This, here's his account right here. Solomon Ahmad, whose account is still present, but apparently he's locked out, is gotten huge. 356,000 followers. Calisi points out, Twitter has suspended him. Here's the actual email they sent to. him, he's kicked out of his, locked out of his account. Gee, I wonder why.

I think I know why. I'll show you next. But he's been locked out. No reason. Just totally unacceptable. I agree. He's one of the biggest pro-Palestine accounts on Twitter, which, by the way, you can see all these pro-Israel accounts that have exploded like multi-million

followers. Now has no access to his account. And she goes, please look into it. You know, they always try to petition the censor. You know, I don't want to get it. Just call them out. In any case, he's locked out. And here's one of you show you why I think.

this is other than the obvious to stop people that are showing you genocide that's taking place. Oh, someone online or well is saying now he's back maybe, but in any case, it's the fact that it even happened. Let me show you what I think. So here, he shares this. Israeli professor threatened to eliminate South African legal team showing you the kind of mindset we're dealing with here. He wrote, I expect traffic accidents to occur in the Hague.

This is normal, an act of God. Think about how crazy that is. That is a threat. That's not even a very, that's not even veiled. It's obvious what you're saying that you might kill them in their own, and it will be a traffic accident. Who would know, right?

Sometimes submarines don't come back up. We know why. Remember that clip? It's the kind of, that's the way they think, right? And he just goes, what is this? Now, this is after this. He got locked out after this happened.

I don't know if it's why. Let me show, first of all, I had this up. I found it. Took me forever. And then he deleted it. Now you can see, it says down here,

oh, I did the wrong one, right here, been deleted, right? So that means the owner of this account chose to remove it, which tells you I think they know we're paying attention. Here's what it says. Here's the actual way back machine that I was able to save. I expect traffic accidents to happen in the Hague, normal fate. So, you know, variation on the translation.

That's what he wrote in Arabic, mind you, which is interesting, very, very telling. And here's an image in case I lost it. Here is his account. Here's what his account says, just you know who he is. Lecturer in political science at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem and delegate, and that's the important part, to the Labor Party Conference Professor in Political Science at the Hebrew University in Jerusalem and a member of the Central Committee of the Labor Party. So he's government connected.

He's not just a person at a college university. He is tangential to the government, if not part of it, part of the Labor Party. I think that's important. Right. So understand that he openly threatened the life. of people in the Hague for investigating their genocide. That is sociopathic. And just one other thing he pointed out, by the way,

he said the demilitarized Gaza Strip is permissible for them. Demilitarized, meaning both combination of getting whatever military, you know, control over Hamas, they, whatever they claim that goal is, but also, as they very plainly stated, the, what's the term they used? They need to de-radicalize them, right? So, like exactly what you're seeing with, China and the Uighurs, but they don't care if it happens to Palestinians, right? Who cares over here?

That's what he's saying. So demilitarized, that whole process is permissible for them, and the West Bank is for us. So now suddenly, the West Bank is just now going to be part of Israel proper, one step at a time, all at the same time, quite frankly, but this is just his opinion. But that's internationally illegal from every single standpoint. Nobody is okay with that. And Jordan has said that it would be an act of war on top of many acts of war. I just want to show you the mindset of these people.

And if we point out, they're going to do that, you get called an anti-racist, a bigot, anti-Semite, even though it's plainly stated. Now, let's finish with some important stuff about what's going on here. Daniel Modus from, this was from today. I just find this to be shocking. Satellite images of Rafa revealed the displacement of over a million Palestinians into camps due to the ongoing war. Look at this image, guys.

So here's what it was before. That's the Rafa crossing, the Rafa area, in general. Here's what it looks like now. Holy God, look at that. Just jammed in there. Think about that. Think about the town you live in. And every single person in that town being forced at gunpoint to rush away,

leaving all their belongings with a dirt area here in the middle of, you know, whatever, Texas, Utah, being jammed into an area where you're, don't have food, no water, you're being bombed as you're there, and somehow this is acceptable because, you know, there's bad guys around. I mean, it's just so incredible that they've even gotten away with this narrative. That's what's currently happening. James Z. Z. Zogby points out, this is page one of New York Times showing sites where Israel dropped 2,000 pound bombs.

You already know this story in Gaza's densely populated south. The south, where they were told to flee. Yep. each one leaves a crater the size of a football field and causes damage 3,000. I think that's, is that feet or miles? I think miles, it's got to be feet. Yeah, it's got to be. But what's going to be know in the chat would stand for.

So the point is very far away. And Israel is murdering innocence. It says, and when Israel says they're taking precautions to protect civilians, it's a bold-faced lie. We know that. Their own AI program has made that clear. or their own IDF members have made that clear. The killing of their own hostage has made that clear. It says it's bound and intended to kill everyone within its wide reach.

And by the way, we've given them these bombs. That's the important part. The U.S. government is the one that gave them these. And this is the New York Times investigation being cited by herettes. Israel used the most destructive bombs in areas designated as safe. That's U.S. government provided munitions. They're called dumb bombs. As they say, they're pinpoint targeting areas.

I mean, it's just all so blatantly transparent. dishonest, lies, manipulative. So what they're showing you in this image is just where they're bombing. And these are areas where they told them to go. And these are 2,000-pound bombs that have a huge, yeah, feet. 3,000 feet. So the point is you can bomb a location, but you're bombing in the areas at the very least adjacent

to the areas where people are told to go. So 3,000 feet away, you're going to kill some innocent feet. They know this. it's just so diss, just upsetting. And on top of that, as the intercept writes, on the 11th, Biden admin deployed Air Force teams to Israel to assist them with targets. So not only are they giving them these huge bombs, they're literally helping them kill civilians. And here, one of these, this is again, weirdly enough, the government spokesperson for that one day, I guess forever, this really trying to cement that as what they want you to think it is.

And, you know, Dan well would have been had they not completely. shifted to genocide, which eclipsed everything they ever could have talked about. He says, well, first of all, AMC International put this out. There's no mention of anybody. It just says, civilians must be protected. Always. Right? Nowhere in there does that say only Israel or anybody in particular.

And the fact that he had to respond to this, it says everything. It means he believes, which is what a guilty mind would do, that there's, aiming this at them. But it's clearly about everybody. He simply says, from Hamas. Are you kidding me? Like, you guys are so bad at this. I can't even believe you guys haven't been exposed before this. And I said, from everyone who might hurt them, which by the way includes Hamas, but most obviously include the Israeli government since you've been deliberately killing your own hostages from day one. And it is self-evident that you have been out to destroy Palestinian society. You are a transparent villain.

from Hamas. I mean, my God, it's just so clear. And here's what somebody else pointed out, in the same response from Hamas. He goes, don't look like a Hamas to me, mate. This is just another supporter who writes publicly. Flatten everything. Spare no school, no children's hospital, no old age home,

delete their entire gene pool off the face of the earth. But yeah, but only Hamas, though, right? Muhammad Safa shares something horrifying that kind of overlaps again with the kind of bombs they're using. which is, he said, if you're wondering why some of the dead children in Gaza have no visible injuries or covered in blood, who look like they're sleeping, it's because Israel killed them with thermobaric bombs. We've talked about this.

These bombs suck oxygen out from the air to trigger high temperature explosions. The explosive pressure is so strong that it quite literally sucks the air out of the children's lungs and causes them to internally explode. Now, this is on the peripheral of the explosion. terrifying. How in the world can you expect that to be used in a densely, the most civilian, densely civilian populated area in the planet and not, I mean, it's designed to hurt, guys. Same with their butterfly bullets and everything else they use that is designed to pause punishment. Like this. Video shows aftermath of a summary execution of 15 men in a Gaza

apartment. They, they're just openly assassinating people at this point. Unis Tertarai points out Gaza, Israeli soldiers on TikTok, published documentation showing them bombing unarmed civilians walking in the middle of the street. Credit, Israeli soldier on TikTok. It's everywhere. They're proudly showing them destroying buildings while they're eating popsicles. Like, it's just so blatant and evident. Or we just talked about this, how Israel killed Palestinians waiting for food trucks in northern Gaza.

Literally, when the very few amount of. Basically, these people are starving to death. Not even basically. It's real. Every anonymity, human rights watch, they're screaming about it. They put it at one of the trucks comes through. And these people, which you might expect, are desperate. So they rush and try to take what they can.

And so they argue that they're trying to steal. Or whatever their argument was. They shot the innocent people trying to eat and get fed while they're starving because of what they're doing. It just pains me. And on top of that. there was another part here hold on it was a I figured I this goes better right here right here next one so this is important right so we know that they're doing this but they've lied about it Egypt has called them out repeatedly for their blocking aid and they blame it on Hamas it's hilarious

and it's insulting but Mohammed Shihada points out something important senior Hamas figure cutter sending medicine to Gaza some will go to the hostages right says cutter now whether they allow this to happen is different questions in the 13th Cutter just broke out a deal, which, by the way, again, they're literally housing in offices, the leadership of Hamas that Israel said they're going to give a pass to at least right now and are allowing them to mediate. I just don't know how that doesn't show you that they're desperately trying to maintain that controlled entity. Probably not the body, right? The Hamas entity is now fighting for Palestinian resistance. But these are the ones they've been funding.

That's why they're so rich. They love to make it out to be aid coming through. But no, these people are millionaires and billionaires. They're getting money from the Israeli. Basically, it's Israel funneling a lot of that and whatever else into their arms. Anyway, the point is, cut or broken a deal where Israel would allow more medicine than the sliver they're giving to go into Gaza and return for giving some of it to the Israeli captives. The ones are trying to kill the seams. But it says this is so important to think about, which is the clearest admission that Israel has obviously been obstructing the flow of medicine for 100 days,

while children in amputations without anesthesia. If you can suddenly agree to the deal and allow more to come in, then you've obviously been suppressing it. I mean, it's just so, again, it's so self-evident. Now, talking about the civilians, right, and what they're clearly doing to civilians, and the idea that he's saying, civilians must be protected from Hamas, well, no, well, I mean, yes, but for everybody who might want to hurt them. Well, let's talk about some of those civilians. How about a civilian in Israel?

an Israeli history teacher who has been held in solitary confinement and has lost his job. Why? For posting concerns for civilian deaths in Gaza. Not Hamas. Not resistance. The civilians that they also claim they're fighting for, right? Israel calls itself a democracy in the only democracy in the Middle East. This guy is a teacher who's lost his job and has been held in prison because he says he cares about civilians in Gaza.

Does that show you what their intentions are? I think more than enough today. Now, this is an important part of this. Dan Cullen shared this. No U.S. media outlets are reporting this massive scandal that Israel killed a captive soldier, yet another one. You know, the three point blank shot, one 15 minutes after the other two. That's obvious. But there's Israeli hostages coming home that say they watched bombs that Israel fired, kill their own people.

I mean, it's so obvious. That's not even to get into the Hannibal directive has been admitted to by three different people in their government and the people on the ground who admitted shooting with the helicopters to kill people or shooting the tanks that killed their own people or Yasmin Porat, I believe, who came out and said she watched them kill people or the head of the caboose Bayere who said they watched them kill civilians. Every one of these are on the record. The point is, here's another one. This is even more crazy, though. No U.S. outlets reporting it. Israel killed a captive soldier with poison gas, which shows you they're using poison.

and gas in civilian areas and then lied to his family about it to blame Hamas. Only Israeli media is covering it. Here's the article itself. IDF fails to confirm Gaza's hostage's cause of death. Mother claims poisoning. The mother of the slain hostage, who is an IDF member, accused the IDF of poisoning her son to death inside of a tunnel, which is exactly what we're talking about. They're bombing and they're doing all this stuff after the guy going after Hamas when they know

these people are being held in these areas. At the very least, you have to argue they do not care about them. At worst, you have to think they're trying to kill them. But only Israeli media. Isn't that interesting? New York Times, Washington Post, CNN, every one of them. The rest of them are covering it up so they don't embarrass the Israeli government. Those are the same outlets that promoted the beheaded babies, mass rape lies.

The media is part of the Zionist death cult, he says. Now, here you post this. Here's what it says. Israeli military killed captive soldier Ron Sherman with poison gas, according to his mother. A captive Israeli soldier whose body was recovered from a tunnel in Jablaya refugee camp. Think about that when they bombed that first one, right? I mean, he could have easily been killed then by Israeli forces in December. He writes on Facebook that her son was killed by Israeli military poison gas, not by Hamas.

The result of the investigation. Ron was indeed murdered, not by Hamas, she writes. Think more in the direction of Auschwitz and the showers. but without Nazis and without Hamas is the cause. Not an accidental shooting, not friendly fire, premeditated murder. That's his mother saying this. And he's rarely Jew in Israel. You get the point, guys.

You can read what she wrote. It's just so disgusting that this is so obvious. And he writes down here, Israel's applying the Hannibal directive to the entire Gaza Strip. And there's a good three-minute video just showing you. It's very obvious. And then I want to grab this real quick. I want to just go over that later. good one to play trying to keep this at a certain time.

So here is to the U.S. side. Another great work, more great work by Descensored News, catching Matt Miller looking like a fool, which is pretty much what he does every day now. His arguments, he's even getting more clumsy in the way he speaks because I think you just know that you're being caught. But this is a great clip, four minutes. This is Saeed asking him specifically about the infrastructure, which will show you next, which is obvious. The way response is painful.

Yesterday, the Israeli military occupied and destroyed the Israel University in Gaza. I mean, this is probably number 10 of all 10 universities that they have destroyed. And isn't the assessment of this department or this government that this was a legitimate target? So I can't speak to this individual action. I don't have independent information to verify that, but I can say that we continue to urge Israel to avoid damage to critical infrastructure that would of course include universities and to ensure the protection of humanitarian and medical sites. That has been something we have urged from the outset of this conflict. It is very difficult. And again, I'm not talking about this particular site because I don't

have information about this particular site. But it is always difficult when you see Hamas use those civilian sites to hide its fighters, to launch attacks on Israel. I mean, he's about to say it right now. But my God, I mean, think about the shamelessness of just everything. Every single time just asserting something. Think about the claim that he goes, we can't, we don't know, we haven't investigated, we can't, we don't know, we have to look at every bombing and then we're flexibly stating that Hamas uses them as human shields in that location without any evidence or even investigation to prove that.

I mean, not even Israel stated that. They just did this. No one's even paying attention right now. Not to the, they're bombing hospitals and things all over the place now. And no one's even questioning it because the floated narrative is, well, Hamas was there. They don't even say it anymore because Matt Miller says it for them. but think about the absurdity of claiming you can't, you can't speak on this bombing because,

well, we didn't investigate the explicit bombing itself, but then somehow knowing that it was done because the Moss was there. I mean, this is why he probably is so uncomfortable, assuming he even cares, which maybe he doesn't, because you know,

I mean, I think even a sociopath is uncomfortable with the fact that we can see right through him. Everybody's sitting there is like, come on, dude, you're so ridiculous. We know what you're doing. We know it's obvious.

We know you know too, but we'll go through this little soft. song and dance, dog and pony show. It's just so epping frustrating. Use those civilian sites to hide its fighters to launch attacks on Israel. But there seems to be no evidence that there were any fighters, in fact, any presence, of any kind of military presence in the university itself. I mean, you keep saying that you want Israel not to destroy the infrastructure.

Yet we have seen almost the total destruction of all infrastructure, including schools, hospitals, roads, you know, cemeteries. You know, they just, you know, they excavated a cemetery, for instance, and took bodies. I mean, this is not exactly, tell us in any way that the government of Israel is really paying heat to what you tell them, you know, in any way, by any measure. You're not listening to you.

So we have seen them take some steps to add civilian infrastructure to de-confliction sites. If you just think about the response, and yet they continue to, I mean, I guess I'm jumping at the point anyway. It's just like, I just have, I mean, does anybody actually buy these people? Like literally anybody. Like, I know people will go along with it because their narrative suggests like Eli David will agree with whatever he says because obviously he's, that's what he's going to do. But I just don't, how can you, how can any logical person watch this and see what they're doing and look at them state what they're doing, look at them covering it, laughing about it. And individual statements can play.

I mean, all of it, and then take this at face value. I mean, we are in clown world like I've never seen before today. There are other things that we have urged them to do, that we want them to do better on. It is an ongoing conversation between our two governments and something that the secretary spoke directly with the leadership of Israel in his trip last week. But again, there is also this problem that Hamas does continue to hide in and under civilian infrastructure. So when you see a strike against any one piece of civilian infrastructure to assess the validity of that strike, you have to know what it is that was there. And we don't always know that. Okay.

So his point is it might be. They might be there. We don't know. So we're okay assuming that they might have been there and ignoring all of the fallout and side effects and killings. Because that's your side, obviously. But we will not condemn anything because we think about how transparent that is. And K.O. in the chat points out to deconflicted zones. You know what those deconflicted zones look like?

They look like this. Oh, the spots, they're bombing with dumb two, three thousand pound bombs. Those are the zones that where they're supposed to be safe. So who cares if you add it to a deconfliction zone? They're bombing all of those anyway. See, the cycle of information, you can't hide from this. They've admitted everything. So as the mats of the world and the Bidens of the world,

they are just digging their own graves with all of this information because it's so readily apparent, but they don't care. And I think they're so desperately aligned with this that it's going to get worse before it gets better unless somebody else steps in. And I don't even know what that means. I just mean that when it gets very clear that they're going to keep tripling, doubling down, quadrupling down. I don't know that when I'm speaking from here. In and under civilian infrastructure.

So when you see a strike against any one piece of civilian infrastructure, to assess the validity of that strike, you have to know what it is that was there. And we don't always know that when I'm, at least I don't know that when I'm speaking from here. Based on Said's question about the demolition of the university, I don't know if you've seen the video. It's pretty widely available. I have seen the video. I mean, it looks like a controlled demolition. It looks like what we do here in this country when we're taking.

Because that's what it was. 100%. Taking down an old hotel or a stadium and you have nothing to say? You have nothing to say about this? I mean, to do that kind of an explosion, you need to be in there. You have to put the explosives down

and it takes a lot of planning and preparation to do. And if there was a threat from this particular facility, they wouldn't have been able to do it. So I have seen the video. I can tell you that it is something we are raising with the governor of Israel as we do often do. Like the reason as what. When we see to ask questions and find out what the underlying situation is, as we often do when we see reports of this nature.

Right. And Israel says Hamas was there. And they go, okay, thanks. That's it. Like, it's just so pathetic. I mean, I'm surprised nobody else. I mean, we see Matt Lee and the ones that usually speak up. But it's, again, I don't need to keep making the same point.

It's just, it's almost just so shocking. to me that I have to stop and pointed out how mindlessly obvious this all is. But I'm not able to characterize the actual facts on the ground before hearing that response. But you saw the video. I did see the video. I don't know. I don't know what was under that building. It looks like it was under that building.

I don't know what was under that building. I don't know what was inside the inside. It doesn't matter what was under the building because they obviously got in there to put the explosives down to do it in a way that they did. Again, I'm glad you have factual certainty about it. I just don't. All I have is what I saw in the video. I just don't. I think you guys saw it too. We did see it. I can say that we have raised it with the government of Israel. And it's not troubling to you? We are always troubled by any degradation of civilian infrastructure in Gaza, but without knowing the actual underlying circumstances, I'm a little hesitant. I think for reasons that should be understandable to pass definitive judgment on it from this podium. God, what a coward. I mean, it's his job, right?

But as Said points out, well, okay, so you're always worried about the infrastructure, but they're literally destroying every single piece of infrastructure. So it's just such a cycle of nonsense. They're completely and unequivocally complicit in genocide. They've owned that by now. They know it. They've committed to it. So here's the Cuds network showing you, or rather relaying to you, one of these surgeons.

Right? This is not in it. He's not a Palestinian. He's not a member of Hamas. He supports it, obviously, the Palestinian plight. He was at the Al-Axa hospital. He's testifying publicly right here in this video that he was there when Israel fired a missile at the intensive care unit. It's so transparent. Hello, who are you, and are you here? Nick Maynard. I'm a surgeon in Oxford, and I've been going to Gaza for nearly 15 years, and I've just come out to Gaza. The ICJ on Friday, the Israeli defense legal team said they're doing everything they can to safeguard hospitals in Gaza. Is that your experience? Not at all. I saw the Israeli Defence Hall destroy a hospital in 2014, the Al-Wafa Hospital I visited just after that, having visited it before and it was destroyed and reduced to rubble. On this occasion in Alax hospital a week ago, I was in the hospital when an Israeli missile hit the intensive care unit. So I have seen incontrovertible evidence that they attack hospitals. And some people say, well, that's because they've got some Hamas inside the hospital firing missiles.

Was that the case when the missile hit? No, it was a single shot, a single missile that hit the hospital. There was no gunfire going on. I was in the hospital. there was no Hamas militants at all. Doesn't that matter? You know what I mean? Like, it's just, that's the kind of,

like, isn't that the kind of evidence that Matt Miller is pretending doesn't exist? They don't care. Well, just to show you, I mean, you've seen many of these. It's just one, any one of these videos will never truly encapsulate how much destruction you've seen. But my God, I mean, look at the video. That level of destruction, of infrastructure is unparalleled.

I've never seen, like, Like even in places like Raqa, but it was horrible. This is just clearly it's what they are telling you, which we'll get to next, that they want to resettle the area. But thank God, there are people pushing back. Sarah Abdullah points out that South Africa's lawyers will now are claiming at the very least that they're with, they will bring the U.S. or the UK before the International Court of Justice for their complicity in Israel's genocide in Gaza. I'm willing to bet you they don't even show up. They will exist and that's because they know how obvious this is.

This is what they said. We intend to bring legal proceedings against the U.S. government based on overwhelming evidence that the U.S. government has and is aiding, abetting, and supporting, encouraging or providing material assistance. We've proven all of those just in this show, by the way, and means to Israel and the Israeli defense forces. This conduct by the U.S. government has enabled and continues to enable Israel to engage in international crimes against Palestinian people. I mean, it's very, very on the surface. The point is that they're going to bring both of these countries, the governments, in front of the International Court of Justice. Again, I argue they won't care.

Now, remember the point I showed you about the mass displacement in Rafa? I want to starting on that point and showing you what they're doing, driving everybody that way, just like the leak plan showed you to push them into the Sinai Desert, was one of the clear planned options, whether it happens, we don't know. But the whole point was they're making it. very clear now, even though I've been trying to tell you plenty of people. My point is plenty of us have been trying to tell anybody that would listen that they have never, ever wanted a Palestinian state.

We made that point about the tweet in there somewhere about herettes. His whole point was the only way we can stop the state like that is to fund Hamas. That's while they're publicly pretending they want that. So to be clear, they funded the group that they're calling terrorists to an, order to stop the legal action they pretend they're fighting for blaming on Hamas and the Palestinians. That's a self-fulfilling prophecy right there. The point is, Kudz-Nez News Network, this is Israel's Culture and Sports Minister, part of the government. Quote, we will never allow the establishment of Palestinian state.

Now, of course, today, they make it only about October 7th, but they've been saying this, if you listen to them speak to Israeli media and their own people, as far back as you want to look. They do not ever want this. It's not just because of October 7th. They've always been trying to stop this, including funding the very group that then invaded Israel to stop that. Whether that was by design or not, you guys can decide for yourselves.

But clearly you have to consider that. But they're now in the stage of pushing people into wherever to achieve this goal. He said their news points out. Netanyahu says he has told U.S. that he opposes Palestinian state in any post-war scenario. So again, not even about October. Far forward you want to look. It's done.

But the point, again, is it was never there. They will never, ever going to allow it. They're just now utilizing this to pretend that now we won't, now forever we won't. It's their fault. No, you never have. David DeKamp put this out saying the same thing, said he will told the U.S. that they will never, ever be a Palestinian state. Now, here he is stating this.

You can list for yourself. Hamas responded to this. The war criminal Netanyahu's statement that the Zionist entity will tighten its grip on the entire region. Oh, to make it more clear, he says here, and you can list it for yourself, and this I think is hilariously important as Elon Musk himself was censoring people for saying this in regard to Palestine. And I told you, I showed you on the Lekud Party's own statement, charter statement. Here he is now publicly stating it. And what do you know, not being censored on Twitter?

He says in the future, the state of Israel has to control the entire area from the river to the sea. Well, is that not an accurate? What are you going to do with Palestine? time. It has to be disappeared. So there you go. That is there, if the same argument applies that by Palestinians saying from the river to the sea means the whatever the way they, Israel can't exist, well, it's the same point in reverse, isn't it? Not one of the double standard and a one-sided concept. But he's publicly telling you this. There's not a question right now, but you'll talk about it in certain Twitter circles and they'll call you a conspiracy theorist.

here is I forgot it Let me get his exact Minister of National Security Chairman of the Otsma, I don't remember that I forget what that is. The point is this is

Ben Gavir one of the most extremist entities of the religious Zionism party. This guy's a maniac. Here's what he stated today. I do deny a Palestinian state. Always, thank you for making my point. They just don't care.

Now, another example of that that shows you not only that they're doing this in every possible way, but that they're doing so in a very terroristic type way, the exact way that they've utilized the ISIS entities, the way they've armed the Azov movement, the way that they've created the very thing, or even bombing Jews in Iraq, drive them to create the state of Israel, the reality of Zionism. Deep Barat points out, armed clashes between Egyptian and Israeli forces at the Israeli-Egypt border. this was on the 15. Interesting. Now, they chalked this up to drug smuggling, but he says a group of 20 to 30 armed Egyptian men

were able to cross the border and engage in crossfire with Israeli border guards. Seems very strange, isn't it? It's funny how they seemingly can't do anything because Hamas stops everything, and these people just waltz across and get in a firefight with Israel's soldiers. It says the fire did ultimately injure several Israeli soldiers. Very strange, isn't it? I don't buy any of this. Egypt so far has stayed neutral as an enemy.

intermediary between the Palestinians and Israel's. However, the Israelis attempted to control, I think it's the Philadelphia corridor, and the Egyptians could change their stance. So here's where this gets really interesting. So this is just the story, right? Well, before this, well, this was the story about that. You can read more on. Basically, Israeli minister rules out a ceasefire, which, of course, Gaza faces starvation, but clashes on the border. But before that, here's what was being stated. This is December 31st. Seeks full control of Gaza, Egypt border. Well, just understand what that means is about taking control of the Egypt side of the border.

Why anybody would allow that, but all of this is about trying to push them into this area. If you control that side, well, you can drive them right into Egypt, couldn't you? Here's times of Israel. Israel said to tell Egypt a plan to take control of the border. And this is, yeah, the Philadelphia route. Now, just before that, there was all these weird assertions that there was going to be like a false flag or an attack. Something was going to happen in the Philadelphia route. And then what do you know?

Something happens. I can't prove that this is anything other than it looks like. But my gut tells me, just because people were telling you this is about to happen, that this is some kind of an orchestrated event in order to justify them needing security control over the area because of this lack of control. is that really what happened? I don't know. But I'll tell you, it seems a little bit hard to believe, and all this is going to do is lead to more control, which will drive them through the area, which will achieve their ultimate, you know, the next step. And if you wonder why any of this is being allowed, why all the media seems to not care about any of this stuff, how they're hiding all this information,

right, or the fact that they won't admit to you that they'll never allow Palestinian state, well, look no further than to realize that pretty much every single politician in our country is funded to the teeth, by just a multitude, largely A-PAC and groups like that, but just pro-Israel PACs to U.S. senators. And this goes from, this is from 1990 to 2024. Top of the list, Joe Biden, who has received a hefty $4,000, $346,000 from pro-Israel PACs. I wonder if that influences this decision-making process. What do you think? And if you go through, guys, you'll see Democrat, Republican, Democrat, Republican,

right down the list. $2 million, $2 million, almost $2 million, almost. two million, seven, one point seven million. You know, it goes down in incremental and this, you know, but the point is there's 12 pages. I mean, it's pretty much every single person in our government. That should terrify you. Because obviously, we're

watching how this plays out. Now, let's finish with some important clips. I want you guys to see how even the corporate media, which you could decide why that might be happening and you should question whether there's a reason they want you to ask this, right? You really should be

wondering if this is designed this way. But something tells me it's not. I think that this is the corporate media just being the shameless corporate media that it is, realizing that they are losing control, that their interests are better served by at the very least getting your trust back so they can keep lying to you down the line. But they are going after these guys. Well, I shouldn't even say it like that. This is milk toast compared to what I would do if I was in the room with this man. But listen, even the corporate media, they're not buying it anymore. And it's so hilarious to me how frustrated he gets.

I'm going appalling that South Africa has decided to play advocate for the devil and serve as the legal arm of hummus. Sorry, I just have to say it's right of the gate. The idea that he's saying that they're playing the legal advocate for the devil. They're not doing anything pro Hamas. They're simply highlighting what Israel's doing under whether you believe it or not, their claim to be fighting Hamas. The idea that by pointing out their crimes is somehow supporting Hamas, is the same thing. same analogy they use everywhere, right? You can't, you can't point out that what Russia's saying is true about our elections because that would be pro-Russia sentiment. Well, it's still effing true,

isn't it? Or all these different topics we've had like this over the years. The truth is still the truth, whether or not it's in the interest of a foreign country. But that's the point, right? The point is that now all of the ICJ and all of South Africa are all Hamas, like the UN or anybody else who even blinks in the wrong direction. No, if I may, Mr. Levy, because all advocate for the devil and serve as the legal arm of hummus. I'm going to pause you there if I may, Mr. Levy, because almost every point I put to you or every question I ask you, you respond with an answer that is not relevant to the question. Don't you love that?

You're not answering the question. You're going Hamas, Human Shields. That's not the point. We're asking you a pointed question that whether or not everything you've said about Hamas is true, the question is, does this, you know, X, Y, and Z. But they go, Hamas, it's all they got. directly then. Please. The lawyer there who is serving as the legal representative of Hamas, accusing Israel of genocide,

is presenting a topsy-turvy reality in which Hamas does not exist. It hasn't taken hostages. So he answers in the exact same way. Let me do it another way. Same thing. Israel decided one bright morning to start bombing Gaza. On October 7th, we suffered an act of genocide. We suffered an act of genocide when Hamas invaded our country and burned, beheaded, tortured, mutilated, raped and all the lies. Just the lie, the lie, the lie, all the things that have, very least not been backed up by provable evidence. Beheaded, the rapings, all of it. The burnings, except the burnings are true. They just were people that were burned by their tank bombings and their hellfire missiles, which you can clearly prove, seeing as how Hamas did not have the capability

to do that. But they don't care. They're in desperate mode. It's only narrative because what else are you going to do at this point? ... abducted as many of genocide. We suffered an act of genocide when Hamas invaded our country and burned, beheaded, tortured, mutilated, raped and deducted as many people as it could, as brutally as it could. And in response, we have launched a defensive campaign with very clear objectives to destroy the Hamas regime so that it cannot hurt our people again, and to bring back the hostages who are still trapped in the terror dungeons.

Right, the one you just killed, by the way. But also on the top of that, you mean the Hamas group that you were funding in order to stop Palestinian state? You can't have those things exist. You can't pretend that your goal is to remove the group that you funded into power at the very least you have to accept the responsibility for why it happened. You can't blame all of Palestine. It's just so painful. And the idea of their hostages to bomb them into safety is hilariously stupid. Because you're clearly using dumb bombs with massive destruction power, gas and all sorts of other things,

white phosphorus, and have been proven to have killed your own people repeatedly. So you can't keep pretending that your actions have anything to do with helping these people. Quite frankly, I'm convinced that you don't want them to come home because every time they do, they make you look stupid. I've been pursuing them in full accordance of international law. And that is disputed. I want to ask you about these comments made by Israeli politicians since October 7th. And hopefully we can bring up the quotes. Here we are.

This is your president. It's an entire... Sorry, there's a great point that Sarah brings up in the chat. Right. So let's understand the word genocide, as much as it gets thrown around a lot today. and sometimes in good case, but like against Russia and so on, the point is that it is a legal definition. So by no stretch of the imagination does what,

even if every single thing that they said happened on January, October 7th, doesn't even remotely meet the level of the definition of genocide. You can call it a war crime, sure, if you believe everything they said happened, which most of it's been proven to be false. But that's a great point, right? So you just swing back around to call what they did genocide when you could prove that.

Even if it's all true, meet that. while you're doing everything that absolutely repeatedly gets proven to be genocide. Desperation. Nation out there, seventh, and hopefully we can bring up the quotes. Here we are. This is your president. It's an entire nation out there that's responsible. He's referring to Gazans.

Have a look at this. The next one. We are now actually rolling out the Gaza Nakbar. Nakbar, as people know, is a term for catastrophe. after the 1948 war. No, more accurately, ethnic cleansing. War used by Palestinians about ethnic cleansing. And we all have one common goal,

erasing the Gaza strip from the face of the earth. Right there. That's a member of the podcast. That's a speaker, deputy speaker of the Knesset. Why some people believe that you absolutely don't want Palestinians any longer in Gaza. We think we have been very clear, both in word and indeed. In those words?

Well, Mr. Vachori does not make decisions on security matters in Israel. Well, we think we've been very clear both in word and indeed that the people of Gaza are not. Indeed. That's what he's saying. In word indeed. So, no, your deeds have not. Your deeds are the reason you're being accused. You just can't just keep stating that our words are, no, your words from both Netanyahu,

who by the way is in the council and everybody else involved have clearly stated repeatedly, whether in personal capacity or not, you're part of the government that you do not want them to exist. And then your deeds, that don't even fly. You're obviously doing the opposite. it. But again, desperation. Our enemy. Our anem is, we think we've been very clear both in word and indeed that the people of Gaza are not our enemy.

Our anion is the Hamas regime. And that is why we have gone further than any army in the history of the world to try to get civilians out of harm's way. Now, we just... No, that's a lie. Amnesty International completely broke that down in multiple examples that proved they lied about how they supposedly warn people and directly targeted civilians. Over and over, they just get caught lying. I'm going to bring you back to the words of those politicians, if I may.

We're now actually rolling out the Gaza Nakbar, the Palestinian term for ethnic cleansing. Those are the words of a government minister in your government. Talk about a little bit of historical context. What the Palestinians... Yeah, skip right past the fact. Oops, he is in our cabinet. So, oops, that looks bad. So we'll skip right past it and try to muddy the waters about the word Nakba.

No, I'm just talking about those words. No, so I want to talk about that word Nakpa when the... Skip right past it. Palestinians use the word Nakba. They are referring to the consequences of the decision in 1948. to try to scuttle the creation of a Jewish state. Wow. Nobody believes that.

I mean, not even Zionist. That's so pathetic. Obviously, with the mandate from Britain, they took control of this area and ethnically cleansed it and committed some of the most extreme things you could imagine. I mean, listen to all sorts of historians, listen to other Israeli Jews that will tell,

listen to the oldest living reservist, an old member of the Lehi Party, who will proudly discuss what they did to those people. and many of the record on the record. To argue that it was them trying to scuttle the Jewish state because they all hated Jews, it's just so independent of any factual basis. It's not what actually happened. You're blaming the victim is what you're doing.

That's pathetic for somebody who uses victimhood to make yourself look like you're in control. Under the UN General Assembly Resolution, they declared war in 1948. That war did not go their way. You mean the illegal occupation that they fought against? Yeah, because you destroyed them and you displaced. them and you've never let them come back to any semblance of self-determination. And there were consequences as a result. And how is that relevant to what your government minister has said now?

Exactly. Right. So look, you can try to conflate the idea that what they claim. The point is we all know what they mean when they say knock up, right? So when your person comes out and says another, all it means is the same thing that happened then. So whether you think if their fault or not, he is still acknowledging we want to do that to them.

It's just so simple. Because what he is saying is we want to get rid of these people. No, we do not want to get rid of these people. No, we have been very clear in word and indeed as a government and as the prime minister and the defense minister have said. Nope, the prime minister very clearly comes out and said many things we can point to. But we talk about Neftali Bennett. We can talk about Netanyahu, Amalek. They've all made their statements.

She's denying it. That we urge civilians to get to safety in the safe zone. We've been a safe zone that they bomb with major bombs that don't have, if they're dumb bombs that are, you know, you can go round and round. urging them to go to the safe zones. There is no, the Alamoasi zone has been rendered unsafe because Hamas has decided to. Ah, so see, he skipped. So she said there are no safe zones.

And instead of going, yes, there are, because that you have to say that, right? But they're not. He just goes, but this one was not a safe zone because of what they did. Well, are you now acknowledging there are no safe zones? And if that's the case, then you just got caught in a lie. But he'll deflect and deny. Shoot rockets out of it. Hamas decided to shoot rockets out of it and the United... There's no evidence at all that Almwasi is being used to shoot rockets at all.

Quite frankly, I don't even think that's possible. But regardless, the bottom line, well, no, I think it would be. But the bottom line is they need as amnesty and multiple international groups said from the earliest point, you don't just get to say this. The impetus is on you to prove that's the case before you act. And they repeatedly don't do that. Nations has said absolutely nothing about rockets being fired. And it is...

And it is absolutely tragic that Hamas continues to double down on its human shields. See, that's it. That's all you got. So you kill people that were waiting to cross right in the beginning when you told them to go there? Like it's just pathetic. Egypt's called them out over and over and over. I don't know whether people, your viewers understand the extent to which in the last 16 years, Hamas redesigned Gaza's cityscape in order. Yeah, you funded that.

You paid them to do. You gave them money. It's on the record. So if that happened, you did that. to hide its military assets underneath civilian areas. Which, by the way, the Al-Shefa Hospital, we've already gone through this, probably like most of them, have proven that that was built by Israel, probably utilized by Hamas, but not be, not, the allegation they tried to make about it when that was current today is not, it's provably false. They got caught in 14,000 lies about it. And the bottom line is it made no sense they would use it, knowing that the world discusses that as their headquarters.

It's plainly not the reality. They keep getting caught in doing this. And we have made extensive warnings for civilians. to leave. We've placed 70,000 individual phone calls. Nope. Lie. Right? You can read this for yourself.

I've shown you many times. This is Amnesey's report from October 20th where they say that they did, they investigated all this. And to break it down in the quickest sense, they said that they drove, one case, they told the guy in the street and bombed the building right afterward. That's it. Or, as it says here, they intentionally carried out attacks that didn't take precautions to save people.

They took out, they carried out tax that were just, just didn't care of who. would attack or who it would hurt and then they took the carry out of attacks that would target civilians. All three of those happened. They proved it in their own investigation. Dropped seven million leaflets, 14 million phone calls, 14 million text messages. We have been going more than. Yeah, when there's no power. Any army in history, and I'm quite happy to be fact-checked, more warnings than all armies in

the history of counterterrorism. It doesn't matter how many warnings you give when you then go on to murder civilians. Warfare put together to urge civilians to get out of harm's way. They are not our enemy. This is the Obama argument of just saying, well, there so they're a target. That's not how that works. Our enemy is the rapist regime. There is no such thing out to the Trump.

The rapist regime, right? They just keep saying that. Right? You have not provided evidence. There's not even a single person who has come forward who publicly stated that happened to them. I'm going to pause you that because we're out of time. We would like the creation of safe areas and we would like the UN to cooperate with us instead of condemning Israel for designating safe zones. Wait a minute. Okay. So you'd like safe zones, which you essentially submitted

that there are none. So how is the UN stopping that? The UN is the one that is what he's trying to do right there is pretend that the safe zone of the UN have allowed people to come to that they then bomb are because the UN is Hamas. So it's all their fault without any evidence, of course. What they have spuriously been doing. You know there's no such thing as a safe area in Gaza. We're going to leave that. We hope there very much will be the day after Hamas. Ah, so you have to admit it, though.

There aren't none. So you keep lying repeatedly and then eventually just go, well, there would be if they weren't there. Your own statements contradict what you said like 14 seconds ago. That must be embarrassing for him. Now here is the next one. The points that South Africa has raised in its prosecution. One of the key ones is the statements by Mr. Netanyahu and other ministers. One that became very prominent yesterday was the invocation of the biblical reference of Amalek

and the sort of the massacre that followed. I mean, why did Mr. Netanyahu invoke such a violent biblical tale? Because we are... If not to prompt a genocide? No, we are committed to destroying Hamas. We are committed to destroying the monsters who perpetrated the bloodiest mass mass. Why talk about Amalek? Because it is a very powerful...

I don't want to get into biblical exegesis here instead of having a theological debate with you. Because the Prime Minister knows exactly how that will be understood by the Israeli people who clearly understand biblical reference... It would mean kill them all, which is what the Amalek's thought. was about of Hamas. Because everyone in Israel understands who the enemy is. We've been very clear.

Yeah, all Palestine, which he makes the point next. And worded indeed that the Palestinian people are not our enemy. And we hope to live alongside them in peace and opposed Hamas Gaza. But we aren't going to destroy the biblical reference. It wasn't a searching for. Just in the interest of time, because I want to get this one to three hours. The point is that he goes on to show the video, I think he does. He references it at the very least where the soldiers are dancing.

Right? The soldiers jumping up and down. and they're saying we, you know, Amalek, and, you know, basically make it the saying Palestine won't exist. Remember that video, right? The bottom line is he puts it to him and all he does is his argument is, well, you guys are dumb and only Israelis understand what that means. That's his actual point.

No, we all understand what it means. And your people clearly do too, which is why they were chanting to remove all of Palestine. I mean, it's just, again, desperation. That African case is very sad because they basically decided to become Hamas's lawyer. And I'm same talking points. I paid very close attention to what they said yesterday. And it's as if they mentioned Hamas just to kick the box, so to speak. They mentioned Hamas and they acknowledged that maybe Hamas did some bad things.

He's talking about the South African case. Well, the point was they made it explicit. That's why they didn't let you play your propaganda video. This isn't about Hamas. It wasn't. It's nothing about you. Now, Hamas is contextually part of it that you're arguing that what you think you're doing is justified because of it. But from their side of the argument, it has nothing to do with it.

Let's just take a face value what you're claiming. Fine. What you're doing is still genocide, period. And that's the whole point. But their argument is if they don't make it all about Hamas, then they're terrorists. So the seventh. But the fact that there's a war going on between Israel and Hamas is totally forgotten. Nope, they actually mention it, but he just has to say that.

If Israel is acting in a vacuum in Gaza, that is not acting within the right of every country to self-defense. Well, Mr. Regge, as you know, but as you know, yes, of course Israel has a right to self-defense. But as you know, as a state, and particularly as a signatory to the convention, Israel does not have an unqualified right of self-defense. And what the South Africans are saying, and as you know, they are supported by other states around the world. What they're saying is the way. Iran and Syria and other countries in the global south, and you know, even your allies, including the United States and the United Kingdom.

Historically, never do they get this kind of pushback. Who have stood four square behind you in many ways, have expressed concerns about Israel's behavior. Cameron, the Foreign Secretary of the day, saying that he is worried that there may have been a contravention of international humanitarian law by your state in Israel. So this is the point. Of course you have a right to self-defense. The question is, is how you're prosecuting and using that right and the accusation against from South Africa and others to you. And I would even go as further as I said before, everyone has a right to self-defense. That's a moot point. The point becomes that it's obviously there's a line where it's no longer

self-defense. You can't just keep arguing self-defense and just committing murder. So either if you, even if you still, but his point is still sound. I argue that they've surpassed the whatever you might have argued was a time frame of self-defense a long time ago, is that you are abusing that rise. So, so Lewis, let's be clear. I'm willing to have a serious conversation with the Brits, with the Americans, about Israel's tactics. We're always willing to hear the thoughts of our friends and to engage and can we do a better job. That's a good conversation to have. But that's not what the South Africans are doing.

The South Africans have adopted full, you know, life. How do you say in total, the Hamas narrative and they're accused? I mean, think about how wild that is. That's not remotely what's happening. Again, it's so desperate to point out, or argue that they've just adopted the Hamas narrative, or they're the acting as the legal counsel for the devil. Like, it's just so childish. What they've presented is scathingly provable.

That's why they have to do this. Using Israel of genocide. This is a baseless claim. I think the Americans said this is without any merit. But this child's why they do that. It's totally preposterous. It's outrageous. But Mr. Regge, I mean, isn't the case?

Isn't it the point that you have laid yourself open to that accusation in the manner in which you've conducted this war? Yeah. 85% of Gaza's population have been displaced. The World Food Program has said that 80% of the most hungry people in the world right now are in Gaza. Think about that. Right? And so the point is, this is the kind of pushback they never get. They never, just basic facts that you can prove.

Now, what's your response? Like, they never used to get that kind of pushback. They would state the lie, and it would be... tiptoeing around it. That directly arises from the way in which you have prosecuted, not just the war, but the way in which you have dealt with a humanitarian situation in Gaza. This was not the only way you could have conducted this war. That is the point.

There were other options to you. You have not availed yourself of those options. With your permission, I'll address what you raise in your question. It's true that a large proportion, 85% of the population has been displaced, but why were they displaced? Because we asked them to leave areas of combat so they'd get out of harm's way. And that's not justified. You don't just get to displace.

millions of people so you can flatten their homes and say, well, Hamas might have been there. Again, I just, in time, watch this. My point is simply to show you that interview after interview, these people, you know, it was post-October 7, even then, people were super sensitive. And if you even asked a question, they got aggressive on you, right? They've lost control of this so far that the corporate media is clearly, even with a half-hearted engagement with the facts, making them look like they're maniacs. here's another one.

This guy has earned himself the biggest lying sea of the week. That's what he said. This is somebody who called in while he's on a show and this is what they said. Excuse me. Excuse me.

That is a truth that you are spreading your life. Your Apache newspaper has even stated Apache helicopters killed their own civilians. Horat's covered it. It's been proven by multiple people, including the people in those helicopters. But this is how he responds, because all you have are lies.

That is a fact. Anybody here watching, look it up. The question of reality, Israel is illegally occupied. It did not start in October the 7th. Charada, what's your question? That's the response you get right there when you state basic facts. And of course, Max shares this, the full whinette investigation on October 7th, confirmation of the mass Hannibal friendly fire orders, which we've already gotten from colonels and different people involved, 70 cars hit by Israeli helicopters, tanks or anti-tank missiles, and at least in some cases, everyone in the vehicle was killed. Including, as Max's investigation pointed out, that one of the women that they claim was raped was pulled out of a car after she was killed, and you could tell by the rig of mortis in the way the body was set. It's just so

This right there is one of the biggest examples for me Of why I believe the IDF Altered the scene You could take that for however you will I think some of the worst things that happened They were done after the fact To cover up what happened In any case

Here is the full investigation You can read for yourself Everything in this you've heard it from us already Other than deeper information About the proving of it They did this to their own people Now just to end It's so frustrating to me

that they're basing all of this on the argument they're trying to save these people. And like I told you really early on, they're making this weird push because apparently it's abnormal or not just different and rare, the red hair, essentially. And these were the B-Bas family, right? These ones right here, red hair. Now, for whatever reason, they used them really early. They made all these different posters and things.

They were really leaning into these specific ones. Now, the sad reality, which breaks my heart, is they're dead. They've been killed, admitted by the father in Gaza because of the bombing of Israel, which should not be that hard for you to drop your mind around. They have killed many different hostages already. Gas, bombing, shooting directly, Hannibal directed before they went there. But the crazy part to me is that this, they admitted this that they have died and they continue to use their memory. Or rather the fact that they claim they're still alive to justify what they're not.

they're doing and then continue to bomb where they're held as this as this as Israel wrote right here we will not stop until each and every one of them is home well I said not stop bombing you mean because that makes sense right you'll bomb them right back to safety we see all we all see your lies Israelis are calling you out as well and they keep using these kids here's a video they just put out oh and the point was guys they know this right Hamas has already told them the father's already spoken up, they put the video out. And of course, you can argue it's all lies, but remember, during the last ceasefire, the pause, Hamas tried to return their bodies. Remember that? I made this point many times, and that is what ruined the process, because I don't believe Israel wanted to admit

that they were killed. But here they put out a propaganda video on the 18th, which just makes me sick. Dear Kfir, even though you may not see this from the Hamas tunnels, we want you to to know that as you mark your first birthday, unfortunately in captivity. All of us in Israel and around the world are thinking of you. You see what I mean? It just makes my skin crawl. This is being made by people who know that they're dead, who don't care and still want to use their memory.

Is Eli David on January? Same thing. One year old today. Well, I made the same point. Liar. Even as you know, they've been killed by the IDF. You still carry on using them. You just pick up.

human being. Makes me sad. Same thing. Hundred days. Bring them home now. You can read it for yourself. And here's what Zachary Foster said to end. I think that was it. Oh, that's a couple more. He says, if you care about getting the hostages released alive, you should adamantly oppose, be adamantly opposed to this war because the imperatives of continuing the war and the imperatives of getting the hostages out are a direct contradiction. You shouldn't need to explain that. I mean, it's, again, South Heaven. The bombings are obviously at the very least capable of killing people in which you don't know where they are. I mean, you shouldn't need to explain that to people.

I know you guys get it. But they're literally killing their own people and acting like they're the ones they're fighting for. Must have at least observer, Hamas put out, the Casim Brigades put out this video of the people that are still there. Now, of course, it's not hard to imagine that they put them to this. but the point's still the same. What they're saying in this, I am in constant danger everywhere. It's not about Hamas.

I'm not pretending I know that they're not being abused or whatever else. It's certainly possible. Everyone who's come home has said the opposite. But he's simply saying that the bombings and what they're doing, the lack of food and water because they won't let aid through. It's all because of what Israel's doing.

And they're saying, we're still alive, bring us home while we are still alive. Israel's actions is guaranteeing they won't come home. And again, I think that's exactly by design. And as we covered on January 10th, Egypt, not Qatar, Egypt was trying to meet a deal to actually end the whole thing, and they were close, and then Israel assassinated somebody in, I think this was in Lebanon. And that put a stop to it by design.

Now, Hall of Dream shares that this is what the Hamas is saying in regard to the deals going forward. a new proposal for a prisoner exchange deal that includes a three-month ceasefire and the withdrawal of the army from Gaza, which flatly defused by Israel no matter what. They don't want these prisoners home if it means that they have to stop what they're doing. That shows you everything. The proposal includes the release of thousands of Palestinian prisoners, including leaders, which they don't want either. The proposal includes the return of this place Palestinian to the northern Gaza Strip, which they don't want either. The proposal includes establishing the administration with international funding for the reconstruction of Gaza.

They don't want any of that. That's the point. I think they're doing this to call their bluff to make it clear to the world that Israel doesn't want any of the thing, basically that they want their agenda at the expense of their own hostages, at the expense of the people of Palestine, at the expense of anybody who gets in the way. I think it's plainly obvious, like most of what we talked about today. So we will get into a hell of a lot more. I've probably about another two hours I could have done with more stuff to talk about. but I think this stuff is not just important. It doesn't even do it justice.

The stuff we talked about in the beginning, and my God, I really, if there's one thing that truly keeps me up that makes me, like the stuff that really worries me is that direction, as I've made clear many times. The foreign policy stuff, guys, I mean, this just needs to stop. That's why it's so important that we continue to call this out and take physical real-world action.

I don't mean violence because both are important. People need to see what's really going on. in hopes that we can maybe stop just one more person from being killed poison gas or white phosphorus or whatever else is being used on the ground that we don't know about, let alone the kinetic bombs that are dumb bombs and 3,000 pounds and designed to kill as many people as possible. Speak up. Your voice matters. One person can make all the difference. Speak up, stand up, stay at the course, fight for the people that need your support. Thank you for tuning in today, guys. I just really want to see this stop. I love you all.

As always, question everything. Come to your own conclusions. Stay vigilant.