The Last American Vagabond - Israel Again Sabotages Ceasefire, $200B Iran War Budget & Did The Trump Admin Fake A Rescue Mission?

Starting point is 00:00:00 I frankly think that crisis initiation is really tough, and it's very hard for me to see how the United States president can get us to war with Iran. Which leads me to conclude that if, in fact, compromise is not coming, that the traditional way of America gets to war is what would be best for U.S. interests. Some people might think that Mr. Roosevelt wanted to get us for World War II, as David mentioned. You may recall we had to wait for Pearl Harbor. Some people might think Mr. Wilson wanted to get us into World War I. You may recall he had to wait for the Lusitania episode. Some people might think that Mr. Johnson wanted to send troops to Vietnam. You may recall we had to wait for the Gulf of Tonkin episode.

Starting point is 00:00:44 We didn't go to war with Spain until the U.S. until the Maine exploded. And may I point out that Mr. Lincoln did not feel he could call out the Federal Army until Fort Sumter was attacked, which is why he ordered the commander at Fort Sumter to do exactly that thing, which the South Carolinians had said, would call. on attack. So if in fact the Iranians aren't going to compromise, it would be best if somebody else started the war. But I would just like to suggest that one can combine other means of pressure with sanctions. I mentioned that explosion on August 17th. We could step up the pressure. I mean look people, you're ready and submarines periodically

Starting point is 00:01:28 go down. Someday one of them might not come up. Who would know why? We can do a variety of things if we wish to increase the pressure. I'm not advocating that, but I'm just suggesting that this is not an either-or proposition. It's just sanctions has to succeed or other things. We are in the game of using covert means against the Iranians. We could get nastier at that. It starts with a simple question and ends an objective reality. reality through our journey from there to hear we find one another and ourselves and as the next 24 hours

Starting point is 00:02:18 breaks free from our last we gaze onward in reflection of the day welcome to the daily wrap up thursday april 9th 2026 thank you for joining me to Today, definitely going to be shorter than usual today because I have an interview plan with James Corbett in a few hours or a couple hours. And I plan to wrap this up to make sure I'm time prepared for that. But interestingly, the reason I'm even mentioning that because it's probably going to come out tomorrow is because there's a topic that I kind of want in your minds today that I'm not going to really dive into. And I'm probably going to go into it even more so after we discuss it or we might discuss. It is one of the few things I wanted to throw at him today. And this has to do with a larger conversation that connects with a lot of things that we're going to be.

Starting point is 00:03:12 we've been discussing in multiple ways. And this has to do specifically with the, I guess the Iran war, but largely just foreign policy, just of the U.S. government, but in particular, Donald Trump. And this, let's just take it one point from Israel's, the part of Israel involved in it, that one of my big concerns, even though I'm very clearly of the mind that I think Israel is influencing, if not controlling policy of this country, which is clearly not even the secret point today, everyone's discussing it, variations of it. That's never to say that Trump or the U.S. government are somehow not responsible for their actions. And in fact, if anybody who actually watches this show, they'll hear me say that quite

Starting point is 00:03:49 often. And this is coming from something that, you know, another people are reaching out and saying, you know, why are you giving them a pass? And it's like, you know, it seems like people honestly mean it. Either that means they're literally not watching the show and assuming based on the title or listening to what somebody else is telling them I'm saying, which I think is more the case often than not, that somebody out there who doesn't want people to hear the nuanced opinion of the nonpartisan objective reporter to say,

Starting point is 00:04:12 don't look at that, their Democrat draft or whatever the thing is, right? And so my point is, it's clear that Israel influencing policy does not mean, for example, Trump is devoid of responsibility. In fact, I think very much the opposite. Now, on the other side of it, though, I think it's clear that right now, and this is my opinion, I've been discussing it over the last so many days, that Trump is in this problematic situation where, one, he's losing, on top of that, that it's, his support base is diminishing. And even if he's in line with Israel's agenda or Israel's in line with his, however you look at it, that I think there's a schism right now about what's in best interest for him. And I've always talked about this. So the bigger part of that is the

Starting point is 00:04:48 conversation about whether or not there's an engineered effort here to drive all of this into some kind of a, you know, you could say a greater Israel discussion or you can say technocracy. And I'm not even saying those are necessarily the same thing, but just there's, I do think they're connected. But the idea of whether or not Donald Trump's plan here and that it is a plan and the argument is some kind of grand masterclass of trying to basically, and this is why I think it's hard to swallow, sell himself or at least make himself appear to be bumbling fool and destroying the economy and destroying all this stuff for the long play of somehow enshrining the U.S. power structure forever, or at least for the long term future in regard to the new

Starting point is 00:05:28 global dynamic. And that specifically regarding Iran has to do with the flow of oil. Now, there's logic to this. And again, I'm not going to get into it today. I might reference it points today because I want to make sure we go into that really deeply discuss not just from a place of skepticism but like maybe this is happening and why would it if it was I don't think it's because that was really the plan to start be my opinion I think it could be sort of a retroactive thing or that because people have now thrown it forward I can literally see Trump's administration going that that's we always that's what we were doing and then trying to make that happen and probably failing as they try to implement it but kind of half being facetious it's an interesting thought

Starting point is 00:06:04 because one, I've been really clearly discussing very, I mean, for a long time, a lot of us are this network state agenda, freedom cities, smart cities, great reset. It's all part of the same thing if you're paying attention and not blinded by partisan politics. And well, we've all been worried about what this transition is. And recently I'm seeing Peter Thiel's side of this, Palantir, Curtis Yarvin, Mark Andres, all of these different people swirling around Trump's administration all uniquely tied to this one agenda, largely through Pronomal's capital, but others as well, funding this change. In particular, but the network agenda, network state agenda. And then we have the Hegseth part coming out and saying, this is the new Greater North America.

Starting point is 00:06:48 And Greater Israel, Greater North America, the Technate being exactly what he outlined as the Greater North America. And so the technocracy element seems to be playing a role as well. Now, all these parts, the argument back to that point, is that Trump is doing this for some long-term play, whether his plan or some kind of global background plan, to shift this away from the control that currently stands. All the debt they've used now becoming somehow their biggest secret weapon

Starting point is 00:07:16 or debt they've acquired. So, as I said, we're going to come back to that. But consider that there is a grand plan around all of this. But also, that's why I started with the sort of the Israel and responsibility point, even if that's exactly what's happening, that does not mean there necessarily some kind of, like, that government is reactive. And there's multiple plans, multifaceted agendas.

Starting point is 00:07:39 And I think a lot of times we give them a lot more credit than they're due. And so wondering whether this is the plan is important. But that would not mean then that, for example, they're not also lying to you about what's going on internally. And, you know, it doesn't mean that there's somehow, like, even to put a fine point in this, because I find this interesting. Let's just even say that's what they're doing.

Starting point is 00:07:57 So the argument is that somehow now America first is for the global plan, or at least a global action that somehow draws back America preeminence, but that's from a global perspective. That's still globalism because you're talking about leading it from a global perspective. But on top of that as well, you know, the idea that this is killing people. So we're okay with a world-shattering plan, maybe because it gives the government more power, not the people of the United States, but the elitists in the government. And that we're okay destroying American interest and destroying everything we were promised

Starting point is 00:08:29 because that might happen. I don't know why anybody would go, yes, that thing. That sounds great. Other than those who are so desperate for Trump to be the master dealmaker, that they'll sign up and they'll lean into anything that makes it seem like there is a grand plan and he's not failing. I think that's a really interesting thought to keep in your mind. Now, you'll see why it's relevant to throughout today,

Starting point is 00:08:49 but to not waste any more time because I only, I'm probably going to aim for maybe hopefully under two hours today to make sure we have enough time and largely around Iran and some other points. But I want to start with a couple of things because we're going to update. today on the evolution of from yesterday to today on the lie of the ceasefire and all that. It's gotten frankly incredible from the New York Times confirming what we have said before. Don't take their word for it. I think the evidence speaks for itself that this was something Trump spun up around, you know,

Starting point is 00:09:16 basically knowing he needed to find a way out of this. And that the reason this failed is because like we told you, like a month ago, that Lebanon would be an issue with this because they told you it was part of everything, but somehow Israel wants to treat it like its own thing. I mean, it's, it's an Israel saying, well, too bad, we're going to keep going and somehow that explodes the deal. Why does that show you anything other than Israel's in control the way this goes? Now, I want to start with a couple points before we get into that topic, which will be the primary point today. One, I reached out to Mary Talibotam,

Starting point is 00:09:46 MD, about generally this topic. And I just think she does great work. And I wanted, wanted to reach out and invite her off her interview. She confirmed, but we're still going back on the exact date and time. And I want to talk to her about this topic that just just, you know, like a lot of things, has drifted into the background, and Gaza included for that matter, which is so frustrating because these are majorly important topics. But it's not that it's, you know, my point is that it's the way the field works today. There's still people like Mary talking about this, but it doesn't get momentum and reach to the people that might actually be able to influence things like from a government perspective.

Starting point is 00:10:18 And what she's talking about is that the vaccine injured have been left to fend for themselves. And she says, where is maha? And my point is always is that I don't believe, and I just based on our exchange, I get the sense that she feels the same way in her post, actually, more so, that the argument is that maha is not fake. The government lied to us about that. People like her, myself, and others, believe that we could and should make this country healthy. But the government lied to us all, right? Same with MAGA. Now, there's a different part there where we may disagree on that, what makes this country great again. But either way, whatever we disagree on, we were both lied to because Trump lied to everybody about what he's doing to them, to us,

Starting point is 00:10:53 to everybody. And that's the reality. It's not different from Biden or anybody else or government and always lives to us. I want to invite her on to talk about her perspective on this. What's happening with the COVID-19 fallout that nobody especially conservative seemed to talk about anymore? Again, to be clear, I should even, there are teams, but Republicans, not conservatives. I'm making that confusing, by the way I use those terms,

Starting point is 00:11:14 but the point should be clear that I mean the people who are not the honest magama people, but the people who only care about partisan politics. No matter what is being actually given and whether he's failing everything or not. and discuss the Maha failure in that from the government's perspective and where we really are with all of this. You know, because she's in this fight and every day for these people. And it's just sad. Here is Robert Benson posts this. Maha thinks I should be a patient. So yeah, this is his name.

Starting point is 00:11:41 I'm a patient in Japan. In USA, I schedule my own lab, draw my own blood, research, my treatments, insurance won't pay. Doctors won't help. Life savings drain. Family and friends, don't believe me. This is BS. Right. So isn't this supposed to be the administration that was here for these people? that was because the other side was the ones lying and forcing everything. Well, if you're still thinking that, you're still completely lost in this conversation. It was a bipartisan agenda, and it still is to this very day, since they're still pushing COVID shots, and if you still don't know that, then I'm not sure what sources you're listening to, and maybe you should reflect on that.

Starting point is 00:12:12 But look forward to that because it'll be a good conversation. Now, another point I wanted you not to miss, and again, I will be doing focuses probably in any number of these topics in it of themselves, this one being ICE, that one being COVID-19, fallout, and I will be making more of a focus on where that is because this didn't stop. ICE didn't stop. The national police force that is changing this country's face is not stopping. On top of all that, thinking about the global perspective and what this means in that picture that Trump is building, realize that we've been lied to the entire time.

Starting point is 00:12:41 Now, if you watch this show, you know that in 75 different ways about what they said about ICE, who they were arresting, the violations of everything they were doing, and it's not a partisan point. Now, from the Atlantic Journal Constitution, Atlanta Journal, excuse me, I said worst of the worst were on the streets. Except, and you can verify this for yourself, many were already in jail. And this is not even a new story. This came out a while ago, back in January, I think. And I talked about it then, showing you that they were basically just grabbing people that were in process and acting like they got.

Starting point is 00:13:12 And it were things from the Biden administration. And overall, the worst of the worst turned out to be like 90-something percent of people that barely had any criminal record. most of which were legally here. You know, the whole thing is disgusting. Overtly disgusting. But also, guess what? In here's something from Minnesota. Some criminals ICE takes credit for we're arresting. We're already in prisons. Now, the reason I'm just briefly showing you this is for you to think about this as a lie because it was. Don't take my word for it. Go through the old shows. Go through the research and the evidence that's there. You were played about what this was, about what they were really accomplishing. I mean, even Republicans right now, even team sport Republicans

Starting point is 00:13:49 are out there going they didn't even meet the numbers for immigration we were calling for. So this was an utter failure. The question is, was it failure or was it something that was designed to create something else? I mean, you could have argued they could have even achieved that while creating the secret plan. But at the end of the day, they failed you in that regard and are still rolling out the whatever you think this is and lying to you to get there. Now, that point should be important for everything else we're dealing with.

Starting point is 00:14:13 Lying about COVID shots, lying about glyphosate, food dyes, maha stuff, lying about foreign policy, more spending, bigger government. We were misled. And they misled you about everything, including as they're building this around you. This is the enforcement arm, guys. How U.S. communities have responded to plans, to two plans to covert warehouses,

Starting point is 00:14:35 excuse me, I can't read today, apparently, to convert warehouses into immigration detention centers. You know what's funny about that when I do it live? I read this earlier. I went through the article and somehow when I'm reading it live, I somehow miss this is funny to me. Anyway, the point is about how most communities are pushing back on this.

Starting point is 00:14:49 That's one point to show you that left or right, most places in the country are not okay with what they're doing in this, regardless of what the team sport players were stressing for you. But on top of that, this was billions of dollars for warehouses converted into detention centers

Starting point is 00:15:03 that are basically just waiting and open and doesn't seem to be about illegal immigration, does it? Now, I'm not trying to hype anything. This has been an old story that people often hype because they claim they know something. They probably don't. I'm not saying I know anything in this sense that I'm rather verified

Starting point is 00:15:17 that this leads. leads to something. I do know that they're doing this. I do they know they have these warehouses. I do know there's been an all long story about building something like this for the conversation of eventually dealing with dissident American people. Now, is that true? You can decide for yourself. Do you think, is it possible that they, of course it is. Have you not been paying attention to your entire history? But I don't want to pretend that I know there's FEMA cams built for you everywhere in the world because I don't think we can prove that that's the intention. But these things matter to me. Seeing as how it is still happening and they are spending this money and there's, I mean,

Starting point is 00:15:46 If there's not a real push here, there's not people supporting it, why is this still happening? Now, again, quick point, want you to think about where that goes, because I believe this is all leading to the same direction. Now, we discussed in the yesterday show, as I titled, The Trump Who Cried Wolf, largely around the lie of the deal, the lie of what he was pushing in his vulnerable, insecure position, which I believe is very easy to see, and the lies that you can prove one after another, including the most obvious of what, maybe eight, ten, ten, twenty, tanker. apparently delivering oil that nobody ever saw that never went through because the GPS could prove that

Starting point is 00:16:21 that he says a Ron gave to him that nobody agreed to. It's incredible that anybody can pretend anything he says has value right now when he's been lying so often. Now, that doesn't mean he's lying. The next thing he says, I would never assume that. We should question it, consider it. But he has been lying to you the entire time. It's easy to prove. So watch this show. If you want to get caught up on yesterday, but it will give you brief points to get into it as we go forward. But first, I want to get into a couple things we said yesterday that I want to quickly follow up on. One was when we talked about that White House post from the Iran, this had to do with the idea of whether Lebanon was connected to Iran. And we all know they've been telling you that.

Starting point is 00:16:56 We all know they've been telling you that it essentially is Iran. And I've been constantly trying to show you why that's not actually true. And yet now Vance goes, they have nothing to do with Lebanon because Israel wants to keep bombing them and now it's in their interest to pretend like it's not the same thing. This is how ridiculous it is. And if you're an honest person, it's black and white. Are we pretending we didn't hear them tell us that? I mean, I can go through it all right now again and show you how they literally listed off Iran-back Hezbollah for the reasons

Starting point is 00:17:22 that they claim Iran attacked Americans and then tell us that there's nothing involving them in Lebanon. It's just embarrassing, guys. But the point was about reading this document, remember and talking about the 996 or 4 or whatever it said number, I believe it was 992, excuse me, and wondering whether it was actually posted on this and whether it was deleted.

Starting point is 00:17:40 Now, that's a small point for those that watch every day, this is for you, because it's not. important for those that only two and did in today. But I just wanted to point out that it looks like I was incorrect about that. It didn't originally have the number in this post, but here's why it came from. And it is important to reiterate this point. Because what I said yesterday's show was, I think I might be confusing it with the post. And that's what happened. In the show, I did this, which was in this interview with Robert, we went over this. And I juxtaposed it with this post coming from Stephen McIntyre. And simply, or he added up the numbers and

Starting point is 00:18:14 simply pointed out that 44 incidences with a total of 992 deaths, which, yes, I did check for myself and you can do the math. That's what it adds up to. Just to make that clear. So it's important that, you know, I was incorrect. That's important, but it's a small thing. But overall, it was 992. They claim this in their own post, and yet they claim Iran's killed thousands of Americans when a reality is 992, and most of those were not killed by Iran, but groups they claim are Iran. And then a lot of it was through Iraq when they were illegally invading and they were defending against the illegal invasion. But, you know, terrorism. But, you know, the small, things like thousands of Americans when the number is 992, that should matter, guys. That's still

Starting point is 00:18:52 dishonesty. These people are nothing but liars. That interview is good if you want to check it out, because we go through in depth a lot of the lies about what they claim are Iran attacks that are not, and that's the best they can do. Now, on top of the NATO point that I wanted to follow up on, and I said this yesterday, and I want to just make sure you saw this, even as Twitter fact checks the White House post, which is hilarious to me. It says, Trump post on true social. NATO wasn't there when we needed them. By the way, here's what's funny before I even get into this. Why do they, this whole game where they like, they take his post on true social and shove it to Twitter, which becomes largely where people look at it. It's like, it's just this

Starting point is 00:19:28 game, like just posted on Twitter. Okay. Like, it's just funny to me that they play. Trump has an account here. It's just this game of trying to like, it just shows you something. You can read that for yourself. Anyway, NATO wasn't there when we needed them. He writes, and they won't be there if we need them again. Remember, Greenland. Okay, that big, poorly run piece of ice. I mean, I'm not even, I mean, you can read into that. I'm sure there's plenty of things we can assume, but I wouldn't recommend that. What does he mean?

Starting point is 00:19:51 That remember Greenland? What, that they didn't take you steal it? The help you steal it? Are you planning to? And they're going to, like, there's a lot you can read into that. Just the main point is, why is even still talking about Greenland? Remember that we were told he was trolling us? Yeah, no, it's legitimately about the idea of, like, and this goes into that bigger point

Starting point is 00:20:06 we made to start. The argument is rare earth minerals. and his plan to corner the market for the U.S. industries and, you know, basically create a situation where the U.S. controls everything. But, you know, there's a lot of strife and trouble and conflict in between all that that that probably won't lead to what he thinks it will. The point, though, is that Greenland is part of the tech name. It's part of the larger conversation. And he's clearly pointing to it. But what did I say yesterday?

Starting point is 00:20:31 And by the way, again, I was incorrect. I think I said Article 36. I was conflating that with the JCPOA, I think. It is actually Article 5 and 6 of the NATO article. and what does it say? Individual or collective self-defense from an armed attack against one or more of them. The whole attack one, attack all, right?

Starting point is 00:20:47 And I said it yesterday, that that's a stupid thing for him to say because they were not attacked, not even by their own admission. So for him argue that NATO should have jumped up and been there because it simply shows you the kind of person Trump is. One, either just because he believes he should

Starting point is 00:21:00 because he is who he is, or two, because he doesn't understand the actual information, but two, that now, when somebody clearly must have told him that, he's still forcing it in because that's the hubris of Trump. But here they are getting fact-checked by their own platform.

Starting point is 00:21:13 Actually, what I said here, as the Trump White House gets called out, even by the narrative management platform that it helped develop, recognize how insecure their position is right now. Important. Now, just on the NATO point, we're not going to get too much deeper

Starting point is 00:21:26 this one point, actually, on top of that, that here is, what's his name, Mark Rut, Rute, I forget, if they're Rudd or Rudy, NATO Secretary General. Listen to what he says right here. Now, this is a recent clip. Now, the point is that here's Trump telling you, you know, we're leaving and NATO's the worst and we have no support.

Starting point is 00:21:45 Now, whether he leaves NATO or not, I'm not sure. My gut would be that's not going to happen. But that's just my opinion. It could go either way. I can see a world in which that would be something they would try to do for many different reasons. But I can also see a world in which that seems counterintuitive to their agenda. So I'm on the fence. But I would argue, if I'm going to guess, I bet you they don't leave it.

Starting point is 00:22:03 Just like last time, he did the same dance and then didn't leave. It's more, because I think they need, they can utilize what this is. That's my opinion. But so here is what Mark Redd have to say in regard to Trump threatening Iran. It just shows you where the power structure truly is. Trump threatened to kill the entire Iranian civilization. Did that bother you at all as a diplomat? Well, you know, what I always say when it comes to what leaders are saying,

Starting point is 00:22:38 I'm not commenting on everything. What I want you to know is that I support the president, and I know large parts of your do when it comes to taking out the capacity of Iran. Oh, Iran, bad guy. Got it. I support Trump. Iran bad guy. That's basically what he said.

Starting point is 00:22:54 Taking out Iran, in what context? Are they doing something illegal? What are we talking about? The lies they keep spending nuclear weapons. These are fabrications. Even according to you, the International Atomic Energy Agency, even U.S.'s own intelligence. So taking out their what? ability to do things that everybody else could legally do.

Starting point is 00:23:11 This is the head of NATO, guys. I mean, this is why we're always highlighting from a globally, the very people that act, I mean, I don't want to go down. The point is, this is a global element, and it is exactly part of the problem. And it's always been there. And it's a U.S. government and Israel largely that have created this problem from my perspective. You know, I'm sure there are other elements from other perspectives. But my point is from like the war on terror, the war of terror.

Starting point is 00:23:33 The reason that became what it did from a global perspective is because of these articles for I believe it was always meant to be this. To export chaos to the region, to Europe, to the whole world. They are one of the main enablers of Russia's war effort in Ukraine. We all know this. Yeah, all the drones. Yeah, how dare they sell drones to other people? I mean, you're speaking to a person in America

Starting point is 00:23:59 whose government sells weapons to literally everybody, and including documented the worst people in the world. Like, there's a report that goes out, and who knows if it even is anymore. But over the years, I used to report on, it where they report, look, they're selling to like every despot in the world and every dangerous person. But yeah, but Iran can't make drones and sell of the people who need to defend themselves against, regardless of whether that's the group we're talking about, but they do sell drones

Starting point is 00:24:20 to a lot of people who are defending against illegal occupation. But just the idea that to stop them from sewing terror in the region, why don't we laugh at this? If there was any honesty, which we know there's not in CNN, you would laugh at that. Like, first of all, what are you explicitly talking about? Then let's compare that to what the other people around them are doing. and let's laugh about what a stupid statement that is. That's not to say they're not capable of it, but it's just not true. It is an existential threat to Israel,

Starting point is 00:24:50 if they would get their hands on a nuclear capability. Oh, right. It's great to try to... Because everything shows that, because if they were to get the thing, they never sought, they don't have, they don't desire that they might do the thing that nobody...

Starting point is 00:25:00 I mean, think about the logic of saying that should they get something, again, that we know they don't want, that the evidence shows they're not seeking, that they'll destroy Israel, based on what logic? They've never said that. They're not claiming to.

Starting point is 00:25:10 They realize they do want to see Israel go away, but they are not standing there going, we're going to nuke Israel. You know who's doing that in reverse? Israel about Iran. Donald Trump and everybody else about Iran, not necessarily in this last little instance, but they have over the years. Now, does Iran want to nuke Israel? Maybe.

Starting point is 00:25:25 I'm not trying to read their minds. I've never suggested otherwise. What I'm saying is the evidence in front of us, which is all we should care about, does not show that. So to then just argue that they might kill everybody in the world. If they get a thing they don't want, we should laugh at that, guys. This is where we need to get to. It's illogical, even if it's ultimately true.

Starting point is 00:25:45 And that may be confusing for people that can't really think that deep into logic. But we need to base it on what we can prove. The unknown, anything's there. Anything, right? It's possible that we'd miss something that means everything else we don't want, but the evidence doesn't show it. So to assume into what you think likely is the people, well, now you're in propaganda territory.

Starting point is 00:26:04 Now you're working for them. Negotiated away, but we also always knew that with North Korea, it took too long and then North Korea had its hands on a nuclear and then you cannot negotiate any longer. Yeah, and what happened since then? What are we talking about? Are we now overrun with North Korea missiles and bombs and wars? No, in fact, it literally went away.

Starting point is 00:26:25 Now I'm not suggesting that that means a good, maybe there's secretly planning for some terrible thing. But again, that's my same point. You're in a moment where you're talking about something as if it proves your point. You just pointed to a group that you claim, by the way, got a nuclear weapon and then we never talked about it again. I mean, there was a random report about them firing a missile the other day, and that's it. Like a testing missile in the ocean or whatever. It's just, it's baffling to me that average people who can see these things every day and I guess likely can access our work as well, can't laugh at this stuff. Because it's just, you know, because then you watch the other people

Starting point is 00:26:59 that Jesse Waters and they act like, this is what adults think about. And we should, we should laugh at them too, because they're some of the most juvenile people in this conversation. Oh, sorry, I lost my place. There we go. So basically, NATO saying, I blindly support this because Iran bad guy. And this is Trump pulling away from? Like, why would he pull away from something that is so blindly in line with the agenda? You know, it's, I doesn't mean that's not what's going to happen. It very well may.

Starting point is 00:27:25 And my argument would be, if that's the case, because Trump is building his own. Because Trump or whatever is guiding his agenda and they're building their own thing. Not NATO that overlaps with countries that don't necessarily align with their worldview, but something they can build, right? The Board of Peace and the new WHO and all the different global order they're building. That's what I'm talking about. now Dominic Michael Trippy

Starting point is 00:27:47 points out something that Margeta Green apparently said on the Alice Jones show she says that the Republican Party is so deeply compromised and completely controlled

Starting point is 00:27:56 direct quote by A PAC and Zionists that the entire party needs to be quote burned to the ground I just find this interesting it's I mean whether you agree

Starting point is 00:28:06 with the party point or not this is somebody who was a key ally of Donald Trump who has now turned to the point to where like compromise to no return, that the party needs to be burned down, and that Alex Jones is flirting and talking with people making these points. And I promise you, I could be wrong, but I would bet on it right now

Starting point is 00:28:23 that he will ultimately turn back to support Trump when it looks like Trump is suddenly how, you know, like right now if Trump turns this somehow, it makes it look like he succeeded. Despite all the dishonesty and lies and double crossings, he will turn and go, oh, it looks like Trump did it all. And we now should support him again. Midterms coming up. I hope I'm wrong. I really do. I doubt I am, though. But so the point is, that this is an interesting opinion. Now, I also argue more and more that I think it's leading to her running for president,

Starting point is 00:28:50 and I get that sense. And this would make it feel like nothing to me, quite honestly, but I'm going to be skeptical, but also hope that maybe she sees the truth in it all. But interesting, right? Because this is spinning out. Remember all those people that are shouting us down for talking about how the Republican Party,

Starting point is 00:29:04 rather conservatives, we're seeing this back in January and before that. Yeah, well, I was right. I mean, let's just call it what it is. We were correct. That's exactly what's happening. The internal parties were dividing people are not buying the lies anymore.

Starting point is 00:29:14 You know, just be great if that could be acknowledged, not because I want to be pointed to, but because then people could talk about it, because we could have an argument about, look, it was clear then. And look at all those people lying about it up until right now when everybody already saw it. The point is back behind all the shows,

Starting point is 00:29:28 we all saw it. The average people that don't have a voice everywhere was all seeing it. And it took this long for them to acknowledge, okay, shoot, it's too late. I can't keep gas-lining because I'll lose more audience, so now I have to acknowledge it.

Starting point is 00:29:39 That's what I believe. Now, to make the point about the other side, it's not one side or the other. Case, that's what you were thinking. Here is C-SPAN. Schumer. Iran still has nuclear stockpile and it's nuclear ambitions. And by the way, you watch this video, it's, it's,

Starting point is 00:29:54 I can't believe this guy can even speak clear sentence at this point. He seems completely like, these are old men, okay? They are clearly out of their depth and out of their, like he's just, it's like watching grandfather try to put an electronic device together. You know, it's embarrassing. He's doesn't, anyway, the point at the end of the day is that they're all in the same line. Iran bad. and just look what Trump's doing the wrong way.

Starting point is 00:30:14 Look, see, this is all worse because Trump did the war the wrong way, not the war bad, but war in the wrong way. We wanted the war. We wanted Israel do this. We wanted to attack Iran, but not end up losing. That's basically what they're doing. And it's just pathetic. And as the Soloride points out,

Starting point is 00:30:30 2019, the Onion called it. Chuck Schumer, the American people deserve a president who can more incredibly justify the war with Iran. Nailed it. I love that. Now, this is funny. to me, but I won't include. Now, here's what's interesting is I'm going to play a clip in a little bit of Tucker Carlson making the argument that there are people in the White House desperately

Starting point is 00:30:49 working for peace. Now, at first, I kind of chuckled at that. But then I listened, I watched him, as I always do, as I have opinions, I make sure I do my due diligence. And I listen to his argument. And, you know, and there's, well, at least, I have just a clip, but I listen to more of it. And it's interesting because I'll get to it in a second, where you could argue that what he's saying is not necessarily that Trump is doing, but there are people that are based counteracting what they're doing. And I do, I kind of agree with that, right? I can't be sure.

Starting point is 00:31:16 But my point is saying all of this, I'm very skeptical of Tucker and all the rest, is that you have seen Tucker doing a very, in particular thing and really pulling away from a lot of the other team sport or Republican or conservative commentators and getting a lot of flack for it. Now, I'm, I'm always wondering whether that's just a means to an end to trick you for the next time. Like, we should always wonder. You should wonder that about me.

Starting point is 00:31:37 But even though there's not, there's not some cycle of tricks happening on this show, but either way. So my point is that you then got just like you saw Alex trying to glom on to David Ike when he was being shown to be correct. It's just or pretending to be Bill Cooper's predictions about 9-11 when it wasn't him. This is what he's done all his life. My point is this comes out where Tucker is being shown to be influencing the conversation, or at least discussed within the White House. Alex Jones has been gaslighting you up until like 30 seconds ago about everything happening. And he puts this out and says, the White House is admitting Tucker Carl,

Starting point is 00:32:10 and myself and a bunch of prominent people going after Trump had a huge effect. Oh, yeah, you mean 10 seconds ago you turned around and say Trump bad guy and you're going to take credit for the change that's happening? My God. I don't even need to express anymore. I said, oh, for F's sake, Alex, you are shameless. I hope everybody paying attention can know. This is, it's just glomming on to the next thing.

Starting point is 00:32:35 You, nothing is sacred if this is what you're doing and it's bad to me. Now, this is continually happening. And I keep having these points that I push off because there's so many of them. And I saw this one. I just wanted to make sure I pointed this out because I could probably do an entire show, like an hour long of just one after another of these kind of posts, all in succession from all these 100,000, one million accounts doing this every day. Every single day right now in like more than I've ever seen because of what's going on.

Starting point is 00:33:01 Here's blonde lady 24 with American flag, about 100,000 followers that says, I'm still trying to process what just happened. Now this is kind of a model they use because I've just laughed about one doing this. Remember saying you're trying to process something that happened in 2025? Because that was. It was an old video. Same point. She goes, the highest ranking U.S. intelligence official literally copy.

Starting point is 00:33:22 In fact, let's do that real quick. The highest ranking official just released smoking gun docs. Check this out. Real quick. Real quick. See, that's what I waste time on because I don't have much time today. But I just think this is funny. Let's look real quick.

Starting point is 00:33:41 Mm-hmm. Oh, my gosh. I'm trying to process what happened. The highest ranking official. It's true. The highest ranking official. The highest ranking official. Some of these are large accounts.

Starting point is 00:33:55 Some not. But it's just this copy paste, copy paste. Oh, look. Hazel Moore, who has a smaller one. But there are one. I thought that was one I recognized. There's tons of these. You can look, and it's the same point.

Starting point is 00:34:05 Old clips of Jesse Waters from 2025, whatever it is, right? It's a joke, guys. And she goes, meaning that Trump was right about everything, the fake news, the deep state are real. It's all coming down. And she points to this, which is Elon Musk's tweet, I guess, with a clip that's superimposed on it. It's not his. And I simply said, so you're processing what Elon posted in 2024? Because that's when he posted it back in 2024.

Starting point is 00:34:28 And nothing has happened since where it says there will be consequences for those who pushed foreign interference hoaxes. And the hammer of justice is coming down. Now we now we don't care. Because we got, we wanted, we tricked you into giving us support. now we don't care what you think anymore, but people like this are posting this today, tomorrow, every day. Obama, Belosi, they're going down because they know they're spinning out and they know people are losing support.

Starting point is 00:34:49 So these are either bots or very dishonest people, or I guess just that stupid, but I find that hard to believe. Same point, kind of, Politico, for Republicans fear Iran will cost them the midterm, ceasefire or not. Now, this is coming from, you know, high-level Republican people in the conversation. And as Alan Israel, he goes, well, why? it's such a dazzling success, isn't it? Are we being told that we're winning all day and we've never seen such a success?

Starting point is 00:35:14 But we're worried that this master success will hurt our chances in the midterms. Yeah, that lines up really well, doesn't it? It's just nothing but dishonesty today, guys. Now, before we get back into the rather just largely finished with the ceasefire conversation, one other thing I wanted to point to from yesterday's show that I find really interesting.

Starting point is 00:35:30 First, because, as always, I find it slightly frustrating at people. I let me put it this way, just instead of making it about it. I probably talk too fast. Let's just go ahead and own that, that I am talking about things that I ramble through that go too quick and people, I guess, miss some of my points. You know, that's possible. Or maybe they're misunderstanding what I'm saying or maybe are misrepresenting what I'm saying. You can decide which is which. But I know, I think all of them exist.

Starting point is 00:35:53 This was talked about yesterday. Now, first of all, what I find interesting about this is what I said yesterday was very clearly like, I'm not like, we believe the story. It was simply an interesting story that I very clearly said that's not verifiable and referenced a story. of something else that I claimed was not verifiable, which was an old story that I've been told, and I only thought, I just thought it was interesting. And in the light of the possible tech that we can see today, of course, we should wonder whether this ghost murmur thing

Starting point is 00:36:20 with the down pilot and the heartbeat is all just a false story. Of course. I mean, we're forgetting the hashtag question everything that's literally applied to everything we do. Like, never is it that we go, oh my God, the thing they said, how old crazy. We're always questioning it. I don't assume that either, but just note that look at what we say, because I did yesterday.

Starting point is 00:36:36 And a point on that is that it's important to think about the tech that they might use. And even if they're lying about it, why would they lie? What's the intention there? But I believe, based on what we're talking about, and this is not a heartbeat detector, guys. I don't know why that's getting so wildly misrepresented. It is specifically about like electromagnetic energy and a specific like signature to an each person, which I thought, wow, that's like that interesting story, right? Technologically speaking, I don't see how this doesn't line up with what possible tech is today.

Starting point is 00:37:05 Just make that point. Not to say that we know that it's actually real. Now, this article simply highlights, reportedly the technology works by identifying long-range quantum, what is it, magneto-magnetometer, I just read it earlier, magnetometry, excuse me, to detect the electromagnetic fingerprint of a human heartbeat while pairing the data with AI software to isolate the signature. Now, the heartbeat is just the reference point of where the energy is coming from, the electromagnetic fingerprint.

Starting point is 00:37:34 not that it's literally just like a heartbeat detector, which is somehow how that's being reported. It's about the energy signature. Now, again, maybe that's a whole fake story. But I find it really interesting. The reason I'm saying all this is because there's been this weird push from people going, if you're believing this, then you believe in all these other fake stories, which is, it's a funny thing to say from people who are, you know, we're supposed to be the conspiracy theorist that you're considering things and we're pushing back.

Starting point is 00:37:56 Like, we should go, well, maybe, right? Maybe. Why not? It's just a weird thing to go, we know that's not true. I don't think you do know it's not true. but this was just one of the comments saying the heartbeat tracker is nonsense as silly says you're pretty good on geopolitics but you're so far off with technology. I disagree

Starting point is 00:38:11 by the way, but maybe I'm wrong. I simply said I just want to make sure because I think the important way to frame it is that I said that basically real or not the heartbeat tracker was about electromagnetic signals and one and one time that I did not have

Starting point is 00:38:26 well anyway I think I'm just missing up the reading the point is that ultimately as I said that it's something that is connected to possible technology and ultimately by saying that it's something we can connect it to, I find it interesting, and it connected to this point. Oh, wait, wait, hold on. Oh, tell me I didn't lose that. Oh, there it is.

Starting point is 00:38:47 Okay, I'm sorry. I'm getting ahead of myself. I just want to make it. So I can only point to it since I pointed to it here. That same kind of thing. Here's Health Major saying if you think the Pentagon had technology that can hear a human heartbeat for 40 miles away, well, it's not even what they claimed. So I think that's worth reflecting on.

Starting point is 00:39:01 That's not what they said, and that's not what the technology shows. So why would that be what you're claiming is the report? and why would you then shout people down? It's space to due diligence. We're going to be honest. Across a desert that filled with ambient background noises. Okay, again, it wasn't a volume thing.

Starting point is 00:39:13 It wasn't a noise detector. But, and this is the link. It says it doesn't hear heartbeat. It detects magnetic field generated by a beating heartbeat. All that's the same, that I find that simply interesting because of other technological conversations. And we should consider it,

Starting point is 00:39:26 but we should also doubt whether it actually happened. I just think it's an important thing to stress. In a time when we should be considering all things while questioning everything, in every single thing that we engage, with. Now, here's Gunther Eagleman saying, there's a difference. Bill Clinton abandoned our troops in Somalia. Barack Obama abandoned Americans in Libya. Joe Biden abandoned 13 U.S. soldiers in Afghanistan. Trump move mountains to rescue one American in Iran. Well, okay, the next question is, did that actually

Starting point is 00:39:53 happen? Because there's a very big conversation that's not really getting attention to the mainstream about whether they lied about the entire thing. Now, there's variations to it. One argues that that there was a downpilot, even though we've yet to hear his name and there's no reports and no one's spoken to him. I mean, I find that insane, by the way. But it could have been that they went to rescue him and then used his plight. Some people even argue they created that plight to justify the effort to take uranium or whatever they went in with with the ship, the planes that were far too big for what they,

Starting point is 00:40:23 you know, and now we now know that they got completely annihilated. So if they got annihilated, then how are we claiming they even got somebody back? Like, there's a very weird overlap to this. but the point, first of all, was about the idea that they were able to track it. That's why I started with that. The heart, the electromagnetic heartbeat, whatever. So if the argument is it's fake, well, that simply adds to the idea that this was a manufactured story. So that's to consider as well.

Starting point is 00:40:45 But so let's get into this, too. Patrick Heddingson posted this. Now, here's a video that Iran put out, and you can watch it for yourself, you know, as always, like the Lego stuff. It's clearly, even if it's true, it's still being used as propaganda. So I'll let you watch it for yourself. It's basically just an AI mock video of what they claim happened. and all it really shows is them just annihilating them,

Starting point is 00:41:04 then landing like they're going to conduct the mission, and then Iran just basically taken them out. And so that would imply that Iran suggesting that they did not get anybody out. Now, what he says is Patrick Kennington, which again, we just had a great interview with. He says, video depiction of Trump and Hanks Hess completely botched failed mission to snatch and grab uranium.

Starting point is 00:41:23 Trump's admin tried to spin it into a fake Jessica lunch rescue drama, but the story collapsed. It appears that Iran knew about the operation, and had laid a trap and Hankseth walked U.S. forces right into its cauldron. And he says here, it looks like this is what forced Trump to taco, which is funny, by the way. I was wondering what that meant the other day. And apparently means Trump always chickens out, which is kind of funny because if you really look at the track record, whether or not you think there's something behind it, there may well be,

Starting point is 00:41:50 he blusteres and then doesn't happen over and over and over. And it's not like there's any follow through where there's a deal that ends up happening that proves him to be right or whatever. It's just this constant bluster. And so it's kind of funny. And it says, this is Ahmed saying after the special forces realized they had fallen into a trap, the White House situation room made a critical decision. The main operation to infiltrate the nuclear site was changed into a desperate rescue operation

Starting point is 00:42:12 for the dozens of U.S. command was trapped under Iranian fire. So the argument, and this is important to stress, this is a lot up in the air because our government's not giving us anything. And we should very much question sources coming from the other side of an ongoing war. But the argument here being that they went in for this operation, for your, uranium and then got basically killed or shot down and the whole thing got stopped. And there were some that were alive on they got shot down. And then they went and tried to get them. And then they just decided to make it sound like the whole thing started as a rescue

Starting point is 00:42:43 operation. Now, my point is the evidence we do have speaks largely to one of those two things. Because we have the video, the evidence of the planes being destroyed that they claimed didn't happen. They've been caught lying in numerous examples. They were lying about this operation the day it was ongoing until they finally admitted it. Heg Seth was pretty much made to look like a fool.

Starting point is 00:43:00 Nothing new there. So I just find this really interesting. Here is the cradle. Iran says U.S. rescue of F-15 airmen possibly diversion to steal a rich uranium. Now, remember, they tried to deflect by this by going, oh, they now admit they have it. Trump was right. Well, what did Twitter, even Twitter fact-checked it and said, well, guess what? They publicly admitted that in 2006.

Starting point is 00:43:21 And the entire deal, the JCPOA and everything was about the enriched uranium that we know that they have, which is within their legal program. So that's just that's the best they can do. That needs to continually day after day show you a weak position if the best you can do is clumsily lie about something you can prove is a false story. So it says Iran's foreign ministry stated on April 6th that a U.S. operation, which rescued a downed airman in southwest Iran may have been part of a deception simply to steal their uranium.

Starting point is 00:43:49 Quote, the possibility that this was a deception operation to steal Uricterranium should not be ignored at all, says the foreign minister of Iran. He stated that the area where the U.S. airman pilot was found is a long way from the area where U.S. forces attempted to land and wanted to land in central Iran. Interesting. And it says, and again, take it with a grain of salt because obviously, whatever side you think you support, every side is capable of lying. And it says, quote, is it therefore only logical, it is, excuse me, it is therefore only logical to speculate that the F-15E rescue, in quotes, operation was a fake meant to smoke screen and conceal something more nefarious. The analyst concluded that President Trump already had U.S. boots on the ground, deep inside Iran, in the area where Tehran stores is covered uranium. Now, that doesn't, I'm not going to say that confirms what I've been saying, but it's another element of somebody adding to,

Starting point is 00:44:47 what I believe was the case, which is what they already had troops on the ground. I'm telling you guys, I'm not, I mean, this is my opinion based on evidence, but I can't prove it. I believe it's the case. More and more day by day, the Kurds, the arming of their truth. I mean, every day there's been more evidence to the points of what we were saying before. Now it says, quote, there is a very good chance Trump wanted the stage of surprise snatch and grab before announcing a major victory to the world.

Starting point is 00:45:09 That very much sounds like him, doesn't it? Following the operation, Trump issued an angry statement. Now, I find this interesting on the timing, right? So argument is they tried to do this, failed spectacularly, and Trump then posted, open the effing straight, you crazy bastards. I guess that's not the worst cuss word in the world. Sorry if that's worth children are listening. Or you'll be living in hell.

Starting point is 00:45:32 So think about that weird, you know, that we also, whoa, okay, that's a, that was arguably after he failed and that would make sense to me. And then he also threatened to bomb Iran's power plants and bridges after this failure. That sounds like Trump to me, which would mark a significant. escalation and all the flagrant war crimes. And by the way, Netanyahu has been doing this from the beginning. Let's not forget that. People go, oh my God, Netanyahu threatened this on the 7th. They've been doing it since the moment this started. Schools and hospitals and everything else. The point, though, is that they did say that after Trump had put something at the argument they were

Starting point is 00:46:07 going to stop. And then that day, Israel bombed tons of bridges and locations. They put an entire post out of Twitter. Now, one week before the alleged rescue operation, BBC reported that Trump was considering a plan for U.S. troops to storm, a secretive underground nuclear facility to seize their stockpile. We reported on that. Remember this? March 19th, Trump faces his most difficult war decision. Will he deploy troops to seize uranium? So guys, you want my, I mean, obviously, my opinion, the evidence, not the proof, but the evidence when looked at in entirety, I think it's pretty clear. This is what happened. This is an effort he was already thinking about. He clearly went in to do it needing a victory.

Starting point is 00:46:46 based on what I think the evidence shows, and then failed, and then tried to cover that with a rescue operation that maybe did or didn't even exist. Because remember, the image that was going around that even the governor of Texas shared, Abbott, was an AI image, got called out on Twitter. It's amazing how these things can all be so public, and yet we just can keep, you know, it's the whole thing with Israel and Zionism. Like, we're in a controlled situation here, guys. Do you know what this is obvious?

Starting point is 00:47:10 Anybody paying attention? It's like, yeah, that's wild. And yet it doesn't seem to influence the real conversation because we're being shouted down by a bunch of manipulated people, a bunch of fake media and a bunch of controlled platforms. That's not everybody. Now, this is just the Snopes thing I thought was interesting. No, I'm not trusting what Snopes says. You should never assume that. Video doesn't show downed U.S. pilot in Iranian custody. I just thought that was interesting. This is even Snopes, which, by the way, should make you question whether they want you to think this. That's always

Starting point is 00:47:35 whether Snopes or New York Times or anything. See, I shouldn't even have to say that every time I'm sort of doing that because of the starting point, but I do think it's important for those new. third. And they're simply saying it doesn't. So that's interesting, right? So if that's not the person, and that's what they were pointing to, then it seems to add more to the idea that there either wasn't a rescue operation for a pilot or they lied about it because, I mean, I guess it would be the argument is either they used him or them or it didn't exist at all. Either way, it's pretty disgusting. Now, here's what even Grock had to say. Now, this is not something like you should, from my research, I can't find anything.

Starting point is 00:48:15 Like right now, I look for a long time today to try to find out, you know, is there a name? Is there some kind of a video? Is there his family speaking out? I can't make anything. That's not to say it's not there. Grock says there's nothing. That also is not to say there's nothing there because Grock is wrong all the time. But having something simply says, you know, has anybody gotten the name or heard from the alleged rescued pilot?

Starting point is 00:48:37 And it says as of April 9th, no name has been publicly released for the alleged rescued pilots, either singular or not. I mean, why is that not, why is that not seem insane to anybody else? I mean, for real, like this, you're going to tell me that you, where is he? Is he not speaking to somebody?

Starting point is 00:48:53 Is his family? Like a name's not even released? Now, I mean, maybe you could argue some kind of like security in the middle of a mission. I don't know, but that I find that really hard to believe. But so it speaks to that point again. Now, on the leak overlapping conversation, because this did happen in,

Starting point is 00:49:13 I guess at least one part of it, with the idea of who leaked information with the pilot. Now, that doesn't seem to be what this is about, quite frankly. Now, I remember we talked about this yesterday because Cash posted this, and I wasn't sure at the time which one, which, who and which story it really applied to. And he said, FBI and our partners have arrested a so-com employee for, you know, basically leaking information. So what's interesting, now this is still flushing out too, and there's a dispute between

Starting point is 00:49:36 the journalist that she leaked to herself and the government. And they've yet to actually claim what she leaked, right? But what's interesting is there's a dispute about whether she leaked classified information at all. And so what it comes down to is that clearly off the heels of the leaked pilot conversation, which this doesn't seem to connect to her. Maybe they'll release something that shows that. And then the idea of, what was it, leaked the ceasefire conversation? And Trump threatening journalists for reporting what they're allowed to report.

Starting point is 00:50:04 So what I find interesting is that you arrest somebody like 12 hours later or the next day. So this is Courtney Williams. A veteran, and this is Seth Harp, he's the author of the book that had to do about, was about Fort Bragg and that she was basically talking with him about. Now, whether it's a leak or not, depends on what the content was. Now, it says Courtney Williams is a veteran, a mother, and a patriotic American. She has committed no crime. This is 20 hours ago. Trump's unhinged DOJ will not even say what classified information she allegedly leaked. Now, realize you don't have to divide divulge him information, but you could tell us what it was and why it was illegal to do so. They're not doing that.

Starting point is 00:50:42 her arrest and imprisonment is an outrage for Courtney Williams. He realized that should, I argue if this is a false story, they're making this up to use her to make it look like they're going after leakers, if they released like why and what it pertained to, that would give people starting points to eventually be able to prove whether or not she did. I would argue. And that's why I think they're holding close to the chest. Whitney Webb says, remember when people said Trump would end censorship and protect free speech,

Starting point is 00:51:09 but somehow forgot that during his first term, His administration literally made a plan to murder Julian Assange for publishing and further criminalized national security whistleblowing in other ways. Hope not. I wonder what those people have to say about this. Another American citizen, another veteran. It's getting one after another, it seems. Now, here's where it gets interesting to me. Oh, we'll also again, his post.

Starting point is 00:51:35 And Whitney simply adds to that. So you can't go after Leslie Wexner, but plenty of time to arrest a whistleblower sort. for his Seth's book. And here's what Politico wrote. Army veteran charged with disclosing classified Delta Force tactics. Now, I don't see, based on what everyone is saying, even from the U.S. government, it seems that the broad argument is just like insight into how they operate, which is not the same as what I was saying before.

Starting point is 00:52:03 Like it's this broad, undefinable thing because she is versed on that. But Seth is saying that's not true, saying that that's not the reality. On top of that, it doesn't seem like this wasn't a person who was trying to hide from anybody. This was all very publicly done. So my gut right now, as we read through this, tells me that they're using this woman to get a win. And it's going to make you sick, actually, when you realize what it seems that she's actually leaking about, which turns out to be sexual harassment against her. An army veteran who helped support the elite Delta Force commando unit has been arrested on a charge that she shared classified information with a journalist writing about the secretive team.

Starting point is 00:52:39 Courtney Williams, now to be clear, he is. is writing about these locations and the people involved. The question is whether she leaked something she wasn't supposed to or was just giving context and details about the things that she would be able to release about what they did and how that would, you know, add context to his book. Either one can be possible. And of course, the, and overlaps with her discussing of her being, you know, dealing with sexual harassment within this field, which is not the same story, but I feel like it's connected.

Starting point is 00:53:05 Because I feel like, because this was ongoing. And I feel like what we, what's on the record from the Trump's perspective, Cash's perspective is this is somebody probably in their mind, the Democrat simply because of what she's talking about, which is not the case. I mean, might not be the case. I don't know her political affiliation is that, you know, basically she's trying to sue us for sexual harassment,

Starting point is 00:53:23 the government, the military, so use her. Now, just a thought. But if you can stand back right now and tell me that doesn't align with the kind of shady blowbrow, juvenile, sinister actions we're seeing from this administration, I don't know what you're looking at. Now, Courtney will, Williams, 40, appeared Wednesday in federal court in Raleigh, North Carolina to face a criminal

Starting point is 00:53:46 complaint of unlawful transmission of national defense information. The complaint asserts that Williams disclosed, quote, tactics, techniques, and procedures. It's kind of broad, used by an unspecified special military unit based at Fort Bragg. Those details were classified secret and barred from distribution to foreign countries, prosecutors allege. Just a random thought that pops in my head, what hypothetically wouldn't it be interesting if, let's say, she shared something that wasn't classified when she shared it, but they just added and made it after the fact and used it to go after her. Now, I shouldn't even add that. It's interesting to think about because what we keep seeing with the way they conduct themselves through ice and everywhere else is these guys

Starting point is 00:54:20 will just bald-faced lie just to get something going and then just kind of just do their best to cover it up behind the scenes. We've seen this every day from this administration. So it says an affidavit from an FBI agent supported the criminal case doesn't name the unit or the reporter. But details provided in the court document match a book by author Seth Hart, which now he's posted about, about Delta Force last year, as well as an adaptation that appeared on Politico. So it's the same kind of thing, where you're talking about, you know, like Julianne Assange leaking his information and then published by the Wall Street's Journal and Washington Post, and yet they go after him for leaking the information, even though he was allowed to because he was divulging

Starting point is 00:55:00 crimes, but never went after them. But then later tried to go after people who were doing so. It just clearly they're part of the team. And so the same idea is that Politico literally use the same information. You know, so it just ends up being something where you focus on the person who is revealing the crime as opposed to, you know, like it's always the case with the whistleblower situation in this country. They went after Julian Assange personally and not a single person in all the crimes he had divul. Not one of them has even been investigated for what he showed. But they sure itself went after the guy who proved they were committing crimes because that's what's, that's what's. democracy's all about, right? Now, he says, Harp said Williams endured years of, quote,

Starting point is 00:55:39 vicious harassment of a sexual nature while working to provide special operations troops with passports, driver's licenses, and credit cards that allowed them to deploy abroad while avoiding detection. She eventually filed a formal complaint with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, which you know what Trump and Cash would probably think about that, and reached a settlement according to the author. So she got a settlement even, which I'm sure made them angry. just as a, I'm not done just talking about this administration. Just from a government perspective, I feel like that's what I would argue, is that that would make them adversarial towards her.

Starting point is 00:56:10 Harp said Williams is being unfairly accused. The author, right now, like in general, accused about leaking information, says Courtney Williams, I just read, a veteran, and she simply says has not committed no crime, hasn't leaked anything illegal. Harp, however, said the case required little sleuthing on the FBI's part. Williams is mentioned by name throughout the book and the political discussion, which included her for photos of her. So she wasn't like she was secretly trying to hide anything. This was a, so why would she be public about this if she thought she was breaking the

Starting point is 00:56:41 law? Doesn't mean it's not the case, but it's worth asking. And it says, we never made any attempt to hide that or disguise your identity. Prosecutors have requested that Williams be detained pending trial. Because of course, because she's a threat to everybody. I mean, I think this is obvious, but I don't assume. My opinion is this person is being used. I mean, at least get what was the crime, right? If you claim she did this, then give us some evidence that proves that she did that. If the author and her are saying that's not the case, then you damn well better prove that. If this gets disappeared in the background, it's just like the ice conversation.

Starting point is 00:57:17 And this is alarming. Now, to finish, a little bit more to go, by the way, but this is the last part's pretty much just about the false deal dynamic. We're doing good on time. So I put this in its own little tweet just so it's one spot. if you guys wanted to point these things out together, and I think you should, which is that I simply wrote, so the Trump administration has now admitted that they deliberately collapse the Iranian economy, as percent of you, as you've seen, I'll play again, bragged about, despite claiming of course Iran was responsible.

Starting point is 00:57:48 I don't know why we all can't laugh about a stupid that is. All of them screaming, Iran can't manage their economy. And then he sits there and goes, yeah, we did all that. That's how dumb this is, guys. And they know that because they're lying in the first place, but it doesn't seem to change the conversation of the mainstream alternative media. but and they armed people in Iran while that was happening to violently attack the government, as Trump admitted himself.

Starting point is 00:58:11 What's confusing about this, guys? This was an illegal war started in illegal ways. That's exactly the reality of it. It's an illegal war. So here's percent. Case you missed its first time. And what we have to have done is created a dollar shortage in the country. At a speech of the Economic Club of New York in March, I outlined the strategy.

Starting point is 00:58:32 It came to a swift and I would say grand culmination in December when one of the largest banks in Iran went under. There was a run of the bank, the central bank had to print money. The Iranian currency went into free fall. Inflation exploded. And hence, we have seen the Iranian people out on the street. We will continue. I mean, he quite literally just said that they're in the streets because of what we did to the country. And then they flooded them with weapons.

Starting point is 00:59:03 Now, to be real, they didn't, the honest Iranians out there, as far as I can tell, by and large, according to people like Patrick Henningston that was on the ground in Iran and plenty of others, were not the ones taking up the arms. And as the unions who originally supported that protest, and you have to understand, this was ongoing before. So when they did this, there was already some rumblings about the issue because they've been attacking Iran for a very long time. And they were struggling and people were unhappy with the way they were dealing with it. And so that's when they decided to make it even worse because they knew that would cause more chaos. and it'll be easy to wrap your mind around that they might be able to protest.

Starting point is 00:59:34 There might be a real protest because of what bad it is, if you didn't know these details. And my point is, in that moment, they flooded foreign elements. The union stood up and said, this is no longer a real protest. And they put the weapons in the hands of people. And that's why Trump was now acting like we tried to help them and somebody else stepped in and took them. Well, even the Kurds or those people on the ground. Either way, you committed a crime very clearly. Trump's just trying to kind of work his way around it to make it look like he somehow wasn't

Starting point is 00:59:58 responsible, in my opinion. Guys, it's very clear what he just said. We collapsed their economy so we could take over the country. And they're still failing of that, basically. Now, here is the clip where he's admitting that Trump told you. Now, the president also provided new details on what happened. They weren't new. It was widely reported by most of us in the independent media.

Starting point is 01:00:16 Earlier this year, as the Iranian regime took to the streets and slaughtered what the president tells me is 45,000. Very not true, by the way. Civilians in their own country. After that took place, President Trump told. me the United States sent guns to the Iranian protesters. He tells me we sent them a lot of guns. We sent them through the Kurds. And the president says he thinks the Kurds kept them. Now watch. The point is that even his story changes over the couple of days go on because that's what you do when you lie. And I guess when you get old. But either way, whatever you think the full

Starting point is 01:00:51 or picture is, they just literally told you we started this. We illegally armed them. We illegally collapse our economy. So how, I mean, from that point forward, there is no conversation, guys. They illegally started the war. Everything that follows is their fault and is illegal. It's pretty simple. I just don't know why that's debated by anybody other than those who just need to support the team, which I think is a rapidly diminishing number. Now, in case you weren't upset, this will make you more upset, or this will push you over the line, rather. Pentagon seeks more than 200 billion more than $200 billion, which is about a $550 billion increase from the last argument of $150 billion.

Starting point is 01:01:30 But yeah, no more spending, smaller government, no wars, peace president, woo, right? Hooray. Just admit what's happening. We've all been fool before. This is this exactly. I mean, verbatim, the thing he promised wouldn't happen. And now you've even got mission creep going on where the amount continues to grow. Now, in regard to the, I guess the entire thing so far, not just the deal, but Iran and what they've been doing.

Starting point is 01:01:59 I just quickly include these. I mean, there's a lot of content here since most of these shows are hours long, but if you want to take the time to go through them, it'll give you a very clear picture. I argue of exactly what's going on. Because, I mean, a lot of these things get missed. Remember one of the starting points in the early first, just after the first week of March. Mike Prisner said they are deploying people. And that was one of the first points where I was like, well, I already think they got boots on the ground.

Starting point is 01:02:23 This is just more, you know, like in regard to many things. We went over that at the time. And it turned out that this was correct, right, for a lot of different things. And that they were claiming, lying to the people they so respect and telling them they were training and then dumping them in Iran permissions. I think that's why. And on top of that, Graham said at this time, Trump is resetting the world. Well, look at that. Yeah, you're right.

Starting point is 01:02:47 Now, whether again, the plan is what that person claims it is, that it is. does not somehow make Trump's a mastermind deal maker or somehow in the interest of Americans, guys. That's literally in the interest of his global order at the expense of everybody. Because this was war and chaos and destabilization. Do you realize what happens when the, if the world economy collapses and reshuffles into U.S. control, people will die everywhere around the world. People will starve. People will suffer.

Starting point is 01:03:12 But yeah, it's okay because Trump's in control, right? Hooray, we're winning. Even though you're not, you're losing like crazy. But he's winning, kind of. I guess if Israel says it's okay, right? I mean, it's just amazing what people can swallow. We'll come back to that. Again, talk about that more probably in the next couple of days

Starting point is 01:03:26 and hopefully tonight with James Corbett. But going forward, this was March 8th. This is March 9th. New reports show Israel controlling Iran war as Trump drags world into chaos for Zionism. You know, there's always, I mean, this is just plenty of people making these arguments, but just if you're new to this, recognize well before this, making these similar arguments based on evidence we knew could prove all. sourced below like everything else.

Starting point is 01:03:51 This one is from the 23rd. Iranian Revolution yet again exposed as Israeli plot, as Trump played by Israel. And this is because Israel came out and very clearly admitted that, right? That this was the long-term plan. I mean, for crying out loud. When this first started, Netanyahu cheered victory and said, I've been planning this for 40 years,

Starting point is 01:04:06 literally posted on Twitter saying, I've been promising you we'd get the 40 years. And I'll just jump to the end, too, as he tells you today, that it's actually Iran is America's war, that he's been planning for 40 years. Yeah, exactly. That's exactly the case. Next one. This is March 24th. Doubts about Iran's alleged Iran negotiating negotiator deepen.

Starting point is 01:04:28 And this is important because the evolution of this has gotten more and more clear, right? To today, which we're going to talk about more. He has been lying to you, guys. It's not really debatable at this point. Israel, this was the, of course, the story that no one talked about because it turned out to be in Israeli on the bio lab that everyone was talking about. You don't see lives of TikTok, screams about that for some very clear reason. 13 U.S. bases all but unmanageable after strikes. And Trump's faux negotiation. Uninhabitable, excuse me. And that's, I mean, it's crazy if you really take the time to look into this, hiding GPS information.

Starting point is 01:04:59 They're covering this up. And they're losing, as it seems. This was from the fourth, the third of April. Iran refuses to meet and deal with the U.S. government. Now, thinking of the timing, right, this was what was going on. They were saying, we're not even speaking with you. Now, that doesn't mean they were ignoring what they might be offering for an end of the war entirely. The point was we're not negotiating, right?

Starting point is 01:05:18 We're not sitting down and working out points. You either capitulate or we're not talking with you. That's why my argument is, which seems more the case today, that Trump simply gave them what they wanted and then yelled something different to get a small win because he's losing terribly, both in his own political sphere and I think in the war in general. The Donald Trump has changed lie as well. He's the same person he was last time, guys. Everyone trying to say that is trying to desperately convince you to that because they need you

Starting point is 01:05:44 to think that to save their face. And again, Netanyahu claims Iran is America's war. Just think about how sad that is with everything that we've seen so far. Then, of course, the yesterday show, the Trump who cried wolf. So let's finish with this point. Yesterday, here's what he put out. The failing New York Times and fake news, CNN, have reported a totally fake 10-point plan on the Iran negotiations, which was meant to discredit the people involved in the peace process.

Starting point is 01:06:15 Or was it? All 10 points were a made-up hoax. Evil losers. It was funny how the language is getting so debased, like, you know, these sick freaks, you got people in Congress posting that. What are you, a junior high? It's just so funny. It's such a low bar for people today.

Starting point is 01:06:32 But anyway, evil losers. But discredited. All the points were made up, except the problem is that he agreed to those points. You can see all of this, that they clearly, and this is coming out from, and of course, that's why he's calling out the reports that are coming out saying that. don't blindly trust for mainstream media, combine it with what we're discussing, with what you can prove for yourself,

Starting point is 01:06:51 and what they're arguing it, and yes, verify it for yourself, do your diligence. If you can't, they put it aside. The truth is that it's obvious, based on with Lebanon point, everything else, that they made this agreement, and then either they plan debate to break it,

Starting point is 01:07:03 which is one of the things I'm considering, or Israel simply said, that's not happening. And they're not in control, so they did what Israel told them. We'll go through this. We just understand what we went through explicitly yesterday.

Starting point is 01:07:14 The 10-point plan, Trump literally posted about saying we agreed on the 10-point plan. There is only one 10-point plan. There's is a 15-point plan. You look at those two plans and they are diametric opposites. So if you're going to argue that Iran would agree with that, that means either Iran did and they're lying about it, which is possible, unlikely with the evidence we have, but it's possible. Or Trump is making it up. So let's go through this yet again. Here is DD Geopolitics posting this. I just want to give a shout since that's where I saw it first. And here's the article we can discuss. the White House reviewed and approved the social media post by Pakistan's prime minister, which explicitly stated that Lebanon was part of the ceasefire agreement.

Starting point is 01:07:55 However, after Israel bombed Lebanon, the Trump administration backtracked claiming Lebanon was not part of the included deal. This is New York Post. White House knew about Pakistan ceasefire post on Twitter before it was sent. It seemed like a last-ditch public plea. President Trump's 8 p.m. deadline for Iran, which was already extended seven times, it seems, was fast approaching and Pakistan was trying to orchestrate an off ramp for both sides. So even right there, right there, you could argue that Pakistan was trying to make this not happen

Starting point is 01:08:23 and that Trump was then claiming that that was them dealing with Iran the whole time. Maybe he was being told that. That actually makes sense to me. But if you understand the reality, Iran was not, because now that we see even more after this point, they're turning around going, what are you doing? But if you remember yesterday, they already violated the ceasefire. They're saying, well, we agreed and not even 24 hours later, you violated the 10 agreement. So the end of the day, it seems clear that they were still on that same path.

Starting point is 01:08:48 It says Mr. Sharif, the prime minister of Pakistan, adopted Trumpian parliens, said on Twitter, that progress was steadily, strongly, and powerfully, and was the requested that Mr. Trump extend the deadline for two weeks. That's Pakistan, not Iran. Then he tagged Mr. Trump and others. Now, in that post, as you saw, it explicitly stated Lebanon. Now, but behind the scenes, the White House had already seen and signed off on that statement before Mr. Shreif posted it. And by the way, he tagged everybody.

Starting point is 01:09:18 He tagged Rubio and Trump and everybody. So if we're going to pretend they somehow didn't see it, is pretty dishonest. But it says, according to a person briefed on the communication, a sign that the diplomatic channels were much more active than the message on social media suggested. Now, again, you could argue it like that. But it's clear that Pakistan was the one making this happen and was clearly trying to offer what turned out to be capitulation to Iran. And that's why they said, good, well, on the war, if that's what's really going to happen.

Starting point is 01:09:42 We'll meet on the 11th in Atlanta bad. We'll nail it all down. And the nailing down would be that we're making sure we're actually on the same page. And they clearly found that. That's not the case. It says, and it showed that the White House, even as Mr. Trump was threatening to wipe out a round civilization, unless they capitulated and opened the straight, even though it wasn't technically all the way closed, was actively looking for a way out of the crisis as the deadline drew near.

Starting point is 01:10:08 That's exactly what I'm telling you as well and was before this article came out. The reality, in my opinion, was that he was in a, he was on his back foot. He was on his heels. He was trying to find a way out of it, but he needed to make it look like he won. And that's why you got all these ridiculous people that came out and said, Master Deal, he made it, the straits open, like it had never, it was literally open before he started this war. So to end in a position where you gained nothing and say you won is just insanely dumb. But I agree.

Starting point is 01:10:37 I think this was the case. I think the evidence backs up whether or not the New York Times said it. Now, to add to that, here is Barack Ravid. I mean, basically a self-professed Zionist propagandist. He wouldn't call self-propagandist, but very clearly somebody who is constantly pushing out information that's a pro-Israel, half the time showing to be false. Like half these stories that come out on Axios about the ceasefire deals turned out to be false over like the last couple of weeks. Like, check for yourself, like over and over and over. And then people would go back and say, oh, well, that came from Axios and Reveed.

Starting point is 01:11:08 And he was saying they made an agreement. And Iran comes out and goes, it didn't happen. And then it later got proven. It didn't happen. So take that with a grain of salt, right? But here's what he has to say. Now, I see this more as him saying this because it's what Israel wants us to hear. But you can decide for yourself.

Starting point is 01:11:24 Going on in Lebanon right now as part of that war. Trump says Lebanon wasn't included in the ceasefire. Iran says it has to be included. And obviously it's Israel that is currently attacking Lebanon and at war there, right? Not the United States. But you have done it's actually not true. But reporting on this. Barack, did Trump and Netanyahu disqual,

Starting point is 01:11:43 discuss Lebanon or is this a last minute Israel is not happy about the ceasefire overall so they're going to do what they want in Lebanon. Did you love that for me? I mean, let's be clear. CNN has all of them left, right, boxing and end. They're always when it comes down to it, blindly supporting Israel. But even that statement, because it's become just common understanding, or is this just yet another example of Israel just doing it at once because it's mad? It's like, yep, it's wild, wild how far this conversation has shifted. And here's what he says in response. No, no, it's definitely not the case. What happened yesterday, when Donald Trump called Benjamin Netanyahu to tell him that he decided to accept the ceasefire and to go for the ceasefire,

Starting point is 01:12:27 one of the issues they talked about was Lebanon. Because for several days now, the Israelis were very concerned that even if there is a ceasefire, the U.S. or Iran is going to ask to wrap the Lebanon issue in. So the Israelis again, just so it's clear, case you forgot, they are the one that told you this was the same conversation. Because when the Iran war started in this recent iteration, Israel instantly went into Lebanon. We talked about this. And weirdly, it wasn't being discussed because that's how ridiculously childishly broken the corporate media is. But it was obvious.

Starting point is 01:13:00 We've been talking about, Craig Murray's been talking about it. It's obviously been going on. And so they just continued that war. But they made it look like it was simultaneous. And so I came out and said, well, I mean, they're the ones telling us. you, Iran is the one in Lebanon. They're the problem in Lebanon. And so then they came out and made the statement, well, this is part of the same war. We're a joint war against all of what Iran is doing. Trump said that. Netanyahu said that. And now they have the gall to turn around and act like,

Starting point is 01:13:25 it's not the same thing and you're confused. I mean, they're gaslighting all of you. And everybody knows that who's not dishonest or, I guess, confused because you take their word over what you actually think you know. But think about that. And of course, the point was that clearly this was always on the same conversation because they said that, as we just showed you the White House post, right? So he says Trump called him and told him about the deal. Okay, well, that's very clear to understand. That means they had already made their agreements. That means the post had already been made. That means they had already agreed to the post. I mean, guys, this is basic stuff. And so he's calling Trump, Netanyahu, and I look, I think this is one point in which

Starting point is 01:14:05 I argue it could be something different. My mind, because of how this is, went down, this can get sort of abstract, is that Donald Trump was desperately trying to make an end to this. And that was at a point where that diverged from what Israel wanted. That's not to say that they're necessarily at odds. I think they're very much in the same line here, but Trump is working for Trump. And at that moment, that's what he needed to happen. And so he did it, I argue, and just to give them what they claim that will give them what they wanted. I'll yell victory. And that's when Israel stepped up and says, you know, I think just my opinion was angry about that. And that's why you saw this incredible bombing that now Trump is kind of criticizing. But I don't think that really

Starting point is 01:14:45 means anything. My point, though, is that I think ultimately it was a schism that he did do this, and Israel didn't want that. But at the end of the day, he was hoping he could do his little deal making and Israel just shut it down. And so they had to lie. So Rubio and the rest came up and they said, oh, do you mean Lebanon is not even involved, even though they just said opposite. This is how bad it gets, guys. But so the other alternative would just simply be that this was a joint effort to manipulate you for some of the reason. I see it more as a little break in what they're trying to do because Trump will fight for Trump at the end of the day.

Starting point is 01:15:15 I argue, whether there's blackmail or what, when it really comes down to it, if it's between losing everything for him and doing what they want, which you'll lose. You know, if you don't do, Israel will still come after you. I think he'll choose himself. I think that's been pretty clear. Spoke to the U.S. for several days about this issue.

Starting point is 01:15:33 Now, the Israelis who are very concerned that even if there is a ceasefire, the U.S. or Iran is going to ask to wrap the Lebanon issue in. So the Israelis spoke to the U.S. for several days about this issue. And doing that call, Netanyahu raised Lebanon again and basically got Trump to say, no problem, we're not going to wrap those two together. Here it is. Iran is Iran. Lebanon is Lebanon. You can continue on doing what you're doing in Lebanon.

Starting point is 01:16:01 And I think that without that green light from Donald Trump, we would have seen Israel go ahead with this very massive... So he's saying, one, that Trump capitulated and said, okay, fine, after they made the agreement and said, fine, Lebanon's not on the table, even though they already agreed to that, then said that Trump or Israel wouldn't have done what they did in Lebanon

Starting point is 01:16:21 if Trump hadn't given the green light. Now, that's, I don't even believe that, but I think this is him trying to make it look yet again, like Israel can do whatever it wants. However, Trump's the one calling the shots, because that's the criminal, not us. We're just following his lead, but we can do whatever we want

Starting point is 01:16:33 because we control everything. Like, that's basically the thing they always kind of do. And I'm talking about the Israeli government. Don't put words in my mouth. The obvious reality here is that this is undermining what Trump is trying to sell. And that's always what Netanyahu does every time. How long have we talked about this? And then Trump never calls it out.

Starting point is 01:16:51 Now, we will see a moment him saying something about the bombing. But what I mean is he never stands up and goes Netanyahu's misrepresenting what I'm saying. Or he double crossed us. You'd never get that, even though it happens all the time. But I'll show you in a second. What I think is Trump's frustration about being caught between people calling him a liar and a clumsy manipulator, or rather he's being manipulated, and then still having to toe the line for Israel, but being frustrated by it.

Starting point is 01:17:17 So here is what Pete Hegg said before we get to that clip has to say about this. My God, I mean, like I've always pointed out, is, you know, you could come up and make a statement that is dishonest, not align with the facts, but it's not bombastic. Right. It's not in Trump's, you know, very Trump-esque, very Trump style, just the wildly over the top, you know, hyperbolic, ridiculous. which clearly he is emulating because Fox News report put this clip out where he talks about how Iran begged for a ceasefire and just it's just this game they play which is wildly over

Starting point is 01:17:54 the top instead of finding some kind of common ground even if it's a lie to make the lie more believable and Trump forged this moment Iran begged for this ceasefire and we all know it oh do we as the president truth this morning a big day for world peace Iran wants it to happen. They've had enough. Yeah, what's hilarious about this is they, I think even while this was being said, they were already going, you broke this, it's over. We're going right back to this and we're in this for the long haul.

Starting point is 01:18:28 If they were desperate for an end, they would take whatever out you gave them. If you were completely in control and won everything, you wouldn't even need to ask them for a deal. It's just childishly obvious, guys. Operation Epic Fury was a historic and overwhelming victory on the battlefield. A capital V military victory. Yeah, apparently we are in junior high.

Starting point is 01:18:53 By any measure, Epic Fury decimated Iran's military and rendered it combat ineffective for years to come. Wow. Okay, so decimated their military capability, rendered them in case. But they were bombing, though. And then apparently stopped you from invading and stopping you and your operation. But yeah, just keep, just make it up, right? We did that and we conquered the moon at the same time because we're the best.

Starting point is 01:19:15 Just shut up. You know, whatever. Just don't even care how ridiculously flimsy your arguments are and how the facts in no way whatsoever back up what you're saying. Just what you get are dumb followers. You go, yeah, breaking Trump, mic drop and they told them all. This is stupid. Like laugh and laugh and laugh at how dumb it is because people are out there doing that. When their own team doesn't support it anymore or just ignore it because it's waste of time.

Starting point is 01:19:40 You see, in less than 40 days. one of our combatant commands, Central Command, SentCom, using less than 10% of America's total combat power, dismantled one of the world's largest militaries. Again, dismantled, even though they're increasing their bombing, even though it seemingly, you know, again, I don't want to even try to misrep. The point that what it looks like to me is the effort of you guys

Starting point is 01:20:05 trying to get them to capitulate. I mean, how can you not see that by now? Now, that doesn't mean they're necessarily winning. It doesn't. but it definitely means that they're not decimated. That's the only real honest way to point that out. The world's leading state sponsor of terrorism proved utterly incapable of defending itself, its people, or its territory.

Starting point is 01:20:29 Yeah, except it did all three of those just now, and it continues to, but, you know, whatever, because Hegsa said must be real. Again, as I say, I don't know how you see that as anything but desperation. Because he's lying. Utterly, obviously. as Pastor Who says, Iran rejected U.S. ceasefire requests five times before agreeing to the ceasefire, which I argue it wasn't even agreeing to the ceasefire. It was agreeing to the end of the, which is effectively the same thing, but I think it's important to argue or to see if I'm correct.

Starting point is 01:20:59 Is it what they agreed to was them giving them everything and simply setting up a date to nail that down? Which then it creates a ceasefire in the meantime, but it's not the same as them asking for a time out, time out. And, you know, it's just, it's silly, guys, it's sad. And we know that they did this. They publicly said it numerous times. Trump claimed he was talking with other regimes and other groups that aren't even here anymore because they never existed. Let's not be ridiculous. And so you're going to tell us

Starting point is 01:21:24 that they begged for the thing that they turned down repeatedly and I've already now turned back because you guys violated it. You have to be a special kind of stupid to pretend like this is even remotely the case. As he says, it's not 1945, guys. We have access to the information on the internet. Now here is what Trump had to say

Starting point is 01:21:42 as they asked him about this kind of overlapping point. I mean, I honestly think the him cussing part of this is just a tactic at this point, but it could just be that he's spinning out. But I think that's the case regardless of what show he puts on in front of the media. But here's what he says. Now, it's very low. He said, you know, the violation of the ceasefire is real Iran. Do you believe Iran's committed to peace? He said, Iran violated it. Israel violated it too. Well, that doesn't necessarily make sense. You know, if they violate the ceasefire, then it's over. There is no ceasefire. I mean, I guess you could argue that you would then want to maintain it, even if they're violating it, but it's not like Israel lobbed off a missile and it's like, whoops, sorry. They just, they bombed hundreds of times, bombed Iran too, by the way, that seems to be completely missed in the conversation. They bombed Iran on top of Lebanon. So whether a lot Lebanon was part of it,

Starting point is 01:22:44 they already violated the ceasefire. And so Iran continuing to go back to the war because they violated it is not Iran violating the ceasefire. Anybody can understand that. As soon as we made the deal, they came out and they dropped the law. load of bombs, the likes of which I'd never seen before. The biggest load that we've seen. And remember, Ravid just told you that Trump gave them the okay to do that. So is Israel lying about Trump? And if he is, if they are, then why wouldn't Trump come out and say they lied about me?

Starting point is 01:23:16 Because you realize Ravid was supporting what Israel's government was telling him. Because that's his job, it seems to relay that. And he never comes out and goes, that's not true. Israel lied about me. Why do you think that is? You know why, guys. It's self-evidence, in my opinion. But so now he comes out because he plays the role.

Starting point is 01:23:33 They probably even talk about this. I'm going to talk you up in the media. I'm going to say you did it because whatever. It's the show they put on. But they did the thing they weren't supposed to do that you basically allowed. Or at the very least, you lied to us about it in regard to the deal. I'm not happy with Israel. You know, when I say, okay, now you have 12 hours, you don't go out in the first hour,

Starting point is 01:23:54 just drop everything you have on them. Except that's what they've done almost every time. So you're either blind or dishonest. because every time, whether it's Gaza or, I mean, you literally name the location Israel's involved in. Or how about just the U.S. government, Saudi Arabia, Yemen, like this is what they do. They pretend to ceasefire. Then they violate it, guys. It's like common U.S. tactics here, at least in my experience.

Starting point is 01:24:16 So for them to do the same thing, shouldn't be that shocking, right? Because they've done it every single time. How many times do we watch them do this during Gaza, whether it was Trump or Biden? Which, by the way, I shouldn't even say it like that during, in the ongoing genocide that they're still committing in Gaza. with them. I'm not happy with Iran either. But I'm really unhappy if Israel's going out this morning because of one. Too late. Already doing it. Already bombing. Israel never even slowed down, guys. Rocket that didn't land that was shot, perhaps by mistake that didn't land. I'm not happy about that. You know what? We have, we basically have two countries. Oh, two countries. Israel and Iran. That's

Starting point is 01:24:56 the problem. But didn't Israel just say this was America's war? Maybe you guys should get your narrative straight. Like, honestly, this is, this is where I'm coming to this point where I think there is a schism, right? This is them trying to shuck the responsibility after Israel. But if you're saying that, like, if we're to take that a face value, did you just admit that you're fighting this war for Israel? Did you just literally tell us that you're engaged with this war that nobody wants because it's Israel's agenda? Yeah, yeah, you did. You literally just did that. And I think this was him just stepping in it because he does it all the time. We basically have two countries that have been fighting so long and so hard that they don't know what the fuck they're doing.

Starting point is 01:25:38 Do you understand that? Now, we've talked about this before for those that are worried, the idea of what, you know, the video of Trump cussing. The point, though, is that when you listen to that and understand the timing of it and the reality of what's going on, there's really, I mean, there's so many obvious gaps between what he says and what Netanyahu says and what Israel puts. out and what the U.S. government puts out. It's every single day if you're just standing back and looking, they don't line up. And they never seem, rather more specifically, the U.S. side never seems to call out what they're doing to them. And I think that speaks volumes. Now, here's what Trump put out April 8th yesterday. All U.S. ships, aircraft, and military personnel with additional ammunition, weaponry, and anything else that is appropriate, necessary for the lethal prosecution and

Starting point is 01:26:30 destruction of an already substantially degraded enemy, he's talking about Iran, will remain in place and around Iran until such time as the real agreement in all capitals, reached its fully complied with. So he's talking about something that's not happening anywhere. Now, we're going to get to the point where I think in beyond belief, Iran is still talking about meeting them on the 11th. I'm honestly, completely blown away by that. And maybe that's their ploy.

Starting point is 01:27:00 Maybe they're going to do something. Who knows? I just think it's insane to think anybody in any position would continue to go to this table with what they keep doing. In any context, whatever your group is, whatever your religion, it seems insane to me. So the point, though, is that Iran has said, we're done. Like in this context, you violated this. And so right now there is no ongoing point. But I guess still hoping they're going to meet at, literally, I get to sum it up quickly.

Starting point is 01:27:25 It seems that Trump said that we're going to reign in Israel. That's what he said. And arguably, and I just don't believe it until I see it happen, Iran said, okay, then we'll still meet you at the 11th in Islamabad. I will believe that when I see it. But so he's talking about the real agreement. Well, it doesn't seem to be existing anywhere. There is no real agreement taking place. As far as you can tell, there's not ongoing discussions.

Starting point is 01:27:45 It's about aiming for that point. And they put forward the 10-point agreement that they say you agreed to. And now you're acting like there's some other agreement. You know, sort of like he kept going the other new regime and the defector and the different people that literally don't exist. that's what he does. And it says, if for any reason it is not, which is highly unlikely. Or, so it's highly unlikely that the deal won't be reached, that everyone keeps telling you is not happening, that they keep telling you is barely on table.

Starting point is 01:28:11 Okay. Then if they don't do what we want, he's saying, then the shooting starts. Literally the shooting. So stupid. Bigger and better and stronger than anyone has ever seen before. That's literally, that should be Trump's tattooed. Like, say the thing. and whatever the thing is, it's bigger and better than anyone's ever seen before.

Starting point is 01:28:31 It attached to everything he says and you're Trump. It was agreed a long time ago. And despite all of the fake rhetoric to the contrary, no nuclear weapons and the strait will be open and safe. So he just literally says that we need to get a deal in place, okay, around Iran. And until the real agreement is made, well, we will maintain our military personnel. And then says, for any reason, if it doesn't happen, well, we're going to shoot like you've never seen.

Starting point is 01:29:01 But then follows that sentence by saying, despite the fake rhetoric, it was agreed a long time ago. This is what I'm talking about. Those don't make sense together. If you're telling us you agreed with, I guess, Iran or some other group you think you're talking to a long time ago, then why would you need to reach an agreement? You want to make sense of that for me? Now, if you're talking about meeting and nailing it down, that's not the same point. it's not even the reality even that point.

Starting point is 01:29:30 It's just so frustrating. Where are the people who's supposed to be helping this old man? Where are the people supposed to go, well, oh, Trump, time out, back, back, back space. That's stupid. You're going to look down for that one. I just don't understand this. So if you agreed a long time ago, then what's going on makes no sense. If you didn't agree a long time ago, then what makes sense is that you're trying to pretend

Starting point is 01:29:49 you had an agreement that no one can even point to. And it says, and by the way, if it was agreed a long time ago, then I guess that would mean your 15-point plan that nobody that is completely counterintuitive to everything they're saying they want because there's no other table there's no other plan on the table he says and despite all the fake rhetoric no nuclear weapons which they never had and don't want and the open straight which was open before you start at this so basically what we demand are the things that were already in existence before we start the illegal war i promise you part of his mind is to go okay we can drift this on long enough to where i can say those things were achieved and i can pretend i won even though we essentially ended up

Starting point is 01:30:26 where we started. But Iran, in my mind, will never let that happen because it'll end up being tolls and control and everything else, which you'll probably capitulate to, but then act like he successfully negotiated a deal when all he gained was nothing and actually lost things. And it says, our great military is loading up and resting looking forward. And he writes quite literally, actually to its next conquest. Conquest. I mean, let's just, what is conquest? This is literally the definition of conquest it says, hold on. It's lost, I to move a thing. It says, oh, dang it.

Starting point is 01:31:05 The little highlighting things making it act funny. There you go. It's so funny. Darn it. Hold on. Stupid computer. It's subjugation is what I wanted you to see, but I just wanted to come up. Why is that not happening? Here we go. What is happening right now?

Starting point is 01:31:27 Can you see that on the screen? Why does it say sync? I'm telling you guys, I'm very worried that there's something going on with my computer. Anyway, I don't even want to get into it right now. Like, I'm, I'm alarmed about the kind of weird things that we're seeing in the back. Look, look at that. Conch, that's not even removed. Anyway, okay, let me do this.

Starting point is 01:31:46 I'm going to do a whole thing coming up soon about whatever's going on with the AI bots. Grock in particular, but the reality of what's happening is wildly manipulative, probably more than you guys even realize. The idea of what they're doing and like swapping out video content behind the scene with the same ID, you know, and these are all, this is like, there's crazy stuff happening. and asking for information where it's being so game behind the scenes. It's like when the whole South Africa thing happened, people ask for the weather and it told you there's no genocide or there was.

Starting point is 01:32:12 That's where it's everywhere right now. Right now if you go in and ask, put into something, at least in my end, and I say, just put in a tweet and say, what are they talking about? It'll give you an answer that it completely disconnects from what's actually pointing to, but relates to some larger story going on. That's about the person who yelled to the ADL about racism or whatever. And it's, that's a video about the weather today. It's actually insane.

Starting point is 01:32:33 But anyway, I digress. Conquest refers to the process of conquering, such as gaining control over a country and people by force. It also denotes something acquired by conquering, including land, riches, and victories. Subjugation is usually one of the things included in the other definition I looked up. The point is there's no context in which this is somehow aligned

Starting point is 01:32:54 with what we claim our values are. But who cares, right? Because Trump's winning and you're winning because he says you're going to take over things. And all of this amounts to your benefit, hardly. Every single thing he's doing will hurt you in every possible way, but the team sports screamers will pretend like America preeminence and conquering the world is somehow in your interest because Trump said so. Now, here is Tucker Carlson saying people in the White House are working

Starting point is 01:33:24 really hard and late to achieve peace. They play it first and we'll talk about it. Really hard, really late trying to fix this to get a piece, even one that diminishes us, where we have to take some lumps, they are doing that. That's the only reason we got to where we were yesterday. It's because people in the White House taking no credit for it whatsoever were working to end this. Interesting, right? So you could take this a couple of ways.

Starting point is 01:33:53 And I am skeptical about, you know, like him saying J.D. Vance is an honest player. It's just baffling to me. He's not. I mean, like, verifiably so. He's lied just as many times as Trump. He's lied about the same things. He lies.

Starting point is 01:34:06 It basically just paratheal lies to the lies that Trump and Elon. putting out. And now he's lying and supporting the Iran war in the same way. He's not supporting peace for Iran. He's literally cheering it on. So I just, you have to factor that in. I don't know why he said that. But either way, what he says here, you could take as, you know, just basically getting you to think that there's secret white hats in the inside. And I find that very dangerous because that's Q, that's Russia Gate. That's everything the government's done to try to get you to support the government because there's a secret team fighting from within. That is the Trump argument. That is they're, they're fighting the deep state from within. It's weaponized.

Starting point is 01:34:38 Now, that doesn't mean false, by the way, because what he's saying might very well be true, regardless of the weaponized agenda around that idea. My point, though, is that you can see, like, here's Tucker calling out Trump administration. Let's just say coming from a place where we hope that he really is seeing the bigger picture, that he really is willing to see beyond partisanship, which it appears in some ways he does. I'm not saying that's the case. He could be lying to us, but the point of Israel and Trump and getting called out by the Mark Levens of the world for calling out Trump in the Iran war.

Starting point is 01:35:05 He has to, and that's why I made fun of Alex at the beginning, because whether, Tucker is lying about this or not, he has taken attack that's very clearly kind of adversarial to the agenda in ways that aligns with what a lot of us are calling out. So whether it's false or not, he is genuinely doing things that get attention that do put pressure on Trump. Alex is not. Alex is grafting onto this. I mean, you know, I already made the point. So here, you have Tucker Carlson saying that people are in there. And you should consider this, that there maybe are people who are within the team. Now, I'm not saying arguing for like the bet, what we are calling for. This is my point about the whole Charlie Kirk dilemma, which is what I argue is most likely here,

Starting point is 01:35:41 that you have America First Republicans who genuinely believe whatever they're actually, whatever, maybe you don't agree with what they think, but they genuinely believe what they're doing is for America First. Then you've got people, or at the very least, they have a different view of how that works for them. That's also important to say. But then you've got the Zionist Christian America First side, which is not America first, which is transparently siphoning American interest for their entry, you know, very

Starting point is 01:36:07 clearly. now it's becoming obvious. And I think that's what people within the team are starting to see. Like the real people behind the scenes that aren't in the front who are going, well, this is not America first. So suddenly there's a problem. Suddenly those people are actually, if this is the truth, working fervently behind the scenes to stop what they see as Israel, Zionism, or whatever you think their mind is from driving this to a place that is not an American address. I can see a world in which that happens. Be skeptical because of the first thing I said, because of how much we know this very sentiment has been weaponized our dire lives, but also consider that it might well be the case and

Starting point is 01:36:43 just, you know, look for that. My point is there is a level of hope in that, if you get my point, is that there might well be people that are trying to stop, even in this moment, the terrible outcome. That maybe they'll then stop it, but then have another bad agenda that aligns with what they want. You know, it's like, my point is government is usually not in our interest, but either way, we can align to stop this horrible thing that's going on. And I'm talking about the whole damn thing, the genocide, multinational taking place in the Middle East, which then I, argue leads to the larger technocratic regime change shifting of our entire society. But back to the point, the U.S. continues deploying thousands of Marines to the Middle East.

Starting point is 01:37:22 Now, this is yesterday, but this keeps being, I mean, here's another example, by the way, which I will basically end with, is massive deployment happening. So after all the conversation, right, and all the ideas that we're trying to make a deal and you just, and one of the explicit points that Iran made was more deployment. troops left in the areas, that's a violation. We won't, and then Trump stands up and goes, we're going to keep them there. Seems like that's a design to stop this, right? And he's over here calling, we're making deals and it's about to happen.

Starting point is 01:37:49 You're explicitly stating the opposite of what they claim is a red line. More troops, more deployments maintaining the war. They love to do this, U.S. and Israel, where they claim we're working on a ceasefire, but we're going to keep bombing over here until you agree. Well, that's insane. Nobody would agree to that, and that's the whole point. So I'm trying to show you is the continued. investment in the war while they claim they're trying to seek an end to it.

Starting point is 01:38:12 Now, remember, Israel warned of the idea of attacking Lebanon, right, would be a violation. That was very clearly discussed. We just went over the point about why that was something they knew about. We know that the U.S. government violated the ceasefire along with Israel. Very clearly outlined, I showed you the evidence myself. And this is Ghalov, the speaker in Iran making this statement saying both the U.S. and Israel violated the ceasefire. Now, Netanyahu, now this, oops, excuse me, this is from today.

Starting point is 01:38:43 Netanyahu authorizes direct talks with Lebanon in potential boost to ceasefire efforts. I mean, this is just pathetic to me because what we're doing now is Israel is feigning what they always do is we're going to have direct talks with Lebanon. Not Hezbollah, Lebanon, who is not what we're, that's the realization here, even though Israel bombs all over Lebanon, Lebanese government is occupied. Hesbola is the popular force that's being supported by the people to fight back that occupation. And so what he's talking about is some fake argument to make it sound like he's working for peace. And meanwhile, continuing to bomb Lebanon, continuing to bomb everywhere else are involved in. This, in my opinion, is an effort to appease the mindless mainstream people who go, yay, peace, he's talking, we're looking for peace.

Starting point is 01:39:28 When Netanyahu, it never follows through with this. And in fact, use the sentiments just like this to make sure you think something's coming to make people in a weak position to take advantage like bombing Soleimani, bombing Kamini, multiple times in Lebanon. It never stops. So this is a feigned effort, in my opinion. And here's what Mariah points out that Netanyahu announces six hours ago, he'll open direct talks with Lebanon that he says will include Hezboa disarmament,

Starting point is 01:39:55 peace accord. So you're working with a group that you already basically are aligned with for the most part, or at the very least, are controlling because I argue that they know that Israel bombs them too, but still somehow supports them over Hezbollah in most ways. But she says this comes 24 hours after some of the deadliest Israeli strikes on Lebanon since October 7th. Hundreds in about 10 minutes. That's what Trump just told you too, more than I've ever seen. So you do this than feign peace?

Starting point is 01:40:24 I mean, this is what they do every time, guys. It's disgusting. It's sociopathic. Because here, this is just one of a thousand different images of people that they killed. Because they didn't bomb. I mean, I shall play this right now. Here's what the BBC literally said about what they bombed. Well, more now on Lebanon, where Israel says it's hit more than 100 command centers and military sites in 10 minutes. Yeah, yeah, good job, BBC.

Starting point is 01:40:53 What Israel said, great journalism. You know, the very group that the whole world has seen lie over and over and over and over and over and over and over. Let me preface these remarks with I never, never, ever believe Israel. figures. I've been in the government too long to know that the Israelis are patent liars. In their intelligence community, in their propaganda community, certainly, and in their leadership, they are inveterate liars. Let me say that again. They are. Let me know in the chat. Did you hear that reverberating audio at the end? Let me know the chat. Yes or no? Did it go at the end? Just let me know. One of the things I'm constantly dealing with over here,

Starting point is 01:41:40 but you probably didn't even hear it. So the point here, they lie about everything, guys. That's what they do. The whole world can see this, and it's just we deal with a broken system. These are innocent people that were killed. They didn't bomb military locations. They literally bombed some of the most dense civilian locations. It's self-evident.

Starting point is 01:41:57 They were videos of it. And you get this absurd, completely compromised person who sits there and goes, Israel and say military sites. You can look at the video yourself and prove that's not a case. And they just do it anyway. Because it's vile to me, guys. You did hear that. Yeah, so this is something I'm dealing with, guys.

Starting point is 01:42:14 I don't know what that is. It started at the same time when I deal, by the way, I've never fixed my camera issue. I've never fixed any of the stuff. It's just like this weird setup where I've got able to work through it. I can only use Firefox. None of the rest work. And there's something going on.

Starting point is 01:42:27 Just welcome to the world in which we try to fight the power. No, anyway. So you know, I'm going to find a way around it no matter what. So don't you worry. Hoddy points out, my heart is heavy tonight going through Instagram and WhatsApp stories. everyone I know in Lebanon lost someone today. Entire families killed because we're talking about bombing New York City,

Starting point is 01:42:45 bombing Washington, D.C., bombing London, bombing, you know, the heart of an entire city. Or, I mean, of a country. Like this is a central and multiple, Beirut, like multiple central locations. Horrible people. BBC lying about it. Francesco Albanyi is pointing out. So Israel's here going, we want a ceasefire. And we're going to talk with Lebanon.

Starting point is 01:43:10 Breaking news amid widespread bombing across Arab regions, Israel approves its largest ever colonial expansion in Lebanon. Weird. It's almost like we told you this was happening because they posted it. They talked about it and told you they had Hebrew names for Lebanon. But yeah, I'll just talk about peace because Trump's in control. Under the fog of war, she writes, what I warned on October 14th, 2023 is unfolding. The largest ethnic cleansing land grab in Palestine since the Nakhba. It's happening under our watch.

Starting point is 01:43:38 More details to come. multiple, multiple settlements. I mean, we're talking right now just so it's clear. Lebanon, Gaza, Syria, everywhere they're involved with, that is the Great Real Zero project. They're expanding into more occupation, more settlements in all of these locations. It's all public. You shouldn't even need me to tell you that.

Starting point is 01:43:59 They publicly state it. On top of that, this is posted this morning. Israel issues evacuation order for the entire southern Beirut area. that not you like just for if you don't understand that's like saying southern new york city this is a huge centralized civilian location and they're just going get out of the way i mean it's you it's i don't mean i don't you it's i don't need have words for it to be quite honest guys i'm blown i'm just overwhelmed with how crazy this can be so obvious and even if everything they're saying is true we're dropping leaflets we're telling go it's an illegal

Starting point is 01:44:35 a war. What right do they have to remove people from their homes and then instantly bomb and kill everybody and occupy Lebanon? There's no legal reality here. The UN, these groups and human rights groups, everything seems feckless and ineffectual right now. If this can't be stopped by whatever mechanisms that we say are there to stop this, then those mechanisms don't exist. We just have to be honest about that and we have to start doing what we can to make this stop. These are families and lives and futures that they are wiping out. Kills me. Pepe Askebar writes post what Gullibov pointed out. Iran is fighting for humanity. The world is either with Gaza and against this colonial terror regime or it stands with the Epstein class and child torturers.

Starting point is 01:45:19 There's no middle ground. Hashtagdad, hashtag Gaza genocide. And Pepe Askebar says, well, let's see how that holds in Islamabad. It appears they're going to meet anyway, which I'm only going to believe when I see it. Iran was on the verge of not going and responding harshly to the massacre in Lebanon. Then Islamabad promised Iran that the U.S. will refer to, brain, withhold, restrict the genocidal terrorist in Tel Aviv. Just the dies cast. I literally, I mean, guys, right now, I can tell you right now.

Starting point is 01:45:48 I'm going to give it some more time just to be objective as possible, but Israel right now is breaking these deals. Doesn't matter. I don't, I will be shocked if they actually meet them. And as Alan Mizrai points out, and here's the Iranian embassy in South Africa saying Iranians will head to Islamabad. Last night, Iran was on the verge of responding to the ceasefire violation, like Bob. coming back. Pakistan conveyed messages that the U.S. would stop Israel. This is what's happening. When has that ever been the case? And even if it is, why would you deal with these absolute monsters? Now, he says, I think there is a good chance that Argosi, the foreign minister,

Starting point is 01:46:25 and Galabov will be assassinated in Islamabad. If anything means anything, or if consistency-wise, that's what they've done every time. Every time they've met, they've got them to meet and they've murdered them. That's what they do. I hope not. Arigachi, the former minister, says, Netanyahu's criminal trial resumes. Netanyahu's criminal trial resumes a region-wide ceasefire, including in Lebanon, would hasten his jailing. Going to jail, Netanyahu. And he says, the U.S., if the U.S. wishes to cater to its economy, crater, excuse me, crater its economy, by letting Netanyahu kill diplomacy, that would ultimately be its choice. We think that would be dumb, but are prepared for it.

Starting point is 01:47:06 He's basically mocking what Heggseth said. But he's not wrong. I mean, if this goes in this direction, Netanyahu, he's hanging on in regard to his indictments because he's constantly keeping war going. His people hate him. If you don't know that, you should look. Now, lastly, this is super important to me.

Starting point is 01:47:26 Because we've been talking a lot about the straight-up Fremus, we want to bring the same thing up because it shows you, for those that haven't seen it, that there's still traffic going through. It's not closed. many dishonest or manipulative or blindfolding people who want to tell you. It's not closed. It's been restricted from the very beginning. And what we keep telling you? Basically, put it this way, the what's been truly restricted has been oil. And it has been. So it restricted

Starting point is 01:47:49 for multiple reasons. One, because in some cases, Iran is restricting that passage for certain people. Here are the tankers still there. But on top of that, U.S. and Israel has sort of stressed the idea that it's dangerous, which has pulled back a lot of others. But to be clear, Iran, from the very beginning, is said, we're only restricting the Israel-U.S. access fighting us. That's it. And before that, there was no tolls and everything was open. And so they created this. They did this to themselves. So remember, when this first started, they were letting arguably, and there was happening, Spain, Japan, they were letting people go through other than those fighting them, which means unlimited, anybody. Now, that's not what's happening because people were unsure, they were afraid,

Starting point is 01:48:31 the U.S. and Israel were threatening them not to, all happening. My point, though, is that Now, after what just happened, Iran to limit Hormuz transit to 15 vessels per day under the ceasefire. Now, there's two ways you could take this. And as much as I've researched and I can't read directly from the task Russian news agency. And then I'll show you what Reuters says. Under the current ceasefire, fewer than 15 ships per day are permitted to transit the strait. This movement is strictly contingent upon Iran's approval and the enforcement of a specific protocol. This new regulatory framework operating under the supervision of Iran has been officially communicated to regional parties.

Starting point is 01:49:13 There will be no return to pre-war status quo. That's important. In addition, according to the source, the quote, unfreezing of Iran's blocked assets, like I talked about, if and when that happens, it'll be the same thing they accuse Obama for, even though it's the same point. They're just giving back things they stole. And it says, is a critical executive guarantee that must be realized within two weeks, how hilarious would be if Donald Trump ends up giving the money and tries to tell you with money that we stole from them and it's there to give back for the deal and all the Republicans that have screamed out Obama go yeah it makes sense i can't wait to make fun of that but it hopefully doesn't happen iran also insists that the end of the war must be

Starting point is 01:49:46 formalized in a resolution by the united nation security council which i argue israel will never be a part of if the termination of the war is not codified into u.n security council resolution based on our stipulated terms we are fully prepared to resume combat against the u.s and the Zionist regime is real, that they point out, which you already know, just as we have over the past 40 days and with even greater intensity. It says, furthermore, Tehran insists that during this two-week period, the U.S. cannot increase its troop presence. Too late. Regarding Iranian enrichment, we remain committed strictly to the next, the text of the exchange agreement and are actively holding to it. So, ports to be made here are, it seems to me, and Reuters, of course,

Starting point is 01:50:32 leaves out all the parts they include that shows that they're willing to fight and willing to go on, which is perfect for corporate media. But if with the reality, which I think we could see before, was that ships were going through, but they were only stopping them, why now would it include, and it's a ceasefire that both sides agreed to, a further restriction of the street? Why would, in what Trump has been saying, why would that make sense? Why would Donald Trump either agree to Iran's argument to that to make it less than it was before? in essence of what was possible,

Starting point is 01:51:03 not just what they were letting, you know, what was happening, because I think part of that's the U.S. and Israel threatening people to stop or tricking them to stop. But why would they agree to that? And then the other way around is why would Iran... I mean, like, let me just make it as clear because there's so many different ways

Starting point is 01:51:20 that it can get confusing. I believe that this was an agreement that was put forward and they, for this moment they're in right now, that ultimately the Trump administration, put forward and Iran agreed to. Because it doesn't make any sense for them to limit this when their argument has always been that we're not restricting anybody but you.

Starting point is 01:51:38 But now it's restricted to just 15 a day, period. Now ask yourself, why does that make sense for what Trump was saying or what Iran said they were doing? It doesn't. You want my opinion? That's why you're here. I believe my opinion entirely that this was manufactured this way because what Israel has always tried to do

Starting point is 01:51:56 and that's why they lied about the straight being shut down when it wasn't, was they needed this to affect the global economy. Just on my first argument, because that would then push people into supporting what they're doing. And this ultimately puts the choke on a little bit. But on top of that,

Starting point is 01:52:10 I think that this, you know, going to the larger point we started with. What is the argument that this is about trying to restrict the flow of oil to flow, basically turn the table and make it so the U.S. government largely has control over the situation because now you're dependent on them.

Starting point is 01:52:26 Well, think about that for a second. You went from allowing anybody but you guys to think, saying only 15. Now, like I said, whether or not there was only a few a day happening anyway, that wasn't what was possible. Had anybody and everybody tried, I believe anybody other than fighting them would have been allowed through, and the entire system would have basically come back other than the U.S. and Israel and what they do. And now we're in this moment. We're 15 and that's it. This will affect the prices.

Starting point is 01:52:51 They will go up. And I argue what this is going to do is constantly flow more support and more need to the U.S. doorstep. Now, whether that is in the interest of this larger plan we might discuss tonight and what we'll get into in another show, it's up for you to decide. It could very well just be the need to choke off the system to make people need them against Iran. Very interesting to me. Now, Netanyahu declares ceasefire is not the end. Now, Iran made a very similar statement saying that this doesn't mean the war is over, but I want to clarify the difference between these two statements. Because in here, you have Netanyahu saying he's declared Wednesday that the U.S. ceasefire agreement,

Starting point is 01:53:28 is not the end of the campaign. Now, just that statement, you could say that the same thing. But here's what he says. Let me be clear. We still have objectives to complete. And we will achieve them, either through agreement or through nude fighting. Right. So basically what it means is no matter what you guys agree, if we don't get, we want,

Starting point is 01:53:44 we're going to keep going. Exactly. Which is literally every single time for Israel. So when Iran says, we'll allow this temporary break, which they've already went back to because they already violated it, but they said this yesterday. We'll give you the two weeks until Oslamabad in the 11. But that does not mean this is over yet. We'll nail that down in 11.

Starting point is 01:54:04 They did not say whatever we agree, we're going to keep going until we take this location. It's not what they said. So my point is, it's obvious who the belligerent is here. It's obvious what Israel is putting in the conversation that there is no possible outcome other than what they want at the expense of everybody. And that will blow up this conversation, I mean, assuming they wanted it just to, you know, actually succeed anyway. And here is, on the same kind of point, Smotrich, who, by the way, regardless of whether you realize, like my point I make about like Lindsey Graham saying things, which doesn't represent what everybody thinks, which is important to consider.

Starting point is 01:54:37 Kim saying this doesn't mean the U.S. government or that the Israeli government is going to do this. Now, the difference, though, is that he, in this context of the Israeli government is wildly influential. In fact, him and Ben-Gabir arguably control more influence than Netanyahu, and that's why he needed them to gain this control with his coalition. And when it comes down to it, because they control like the settler movement and all these really alarming Zionist party. They're the religious Zionism party.

Starting point is 01:55:01 They're the extreme parts. They are the extreme parts of Zionism in this conversation, in my opinion. Some of them. So when he stands up and says, I'm officially announcing the start of implementing the greater Israel vision, which you just did three hours ago.

Starting point is 01:55:17 Do you know that this means a much bigger point than just one politician saying that? On top of that, because Ben Gavir supports that, Netanyahu supports that. that most of their entire country supports this. And so what they're saying is we're going to go forward with the illegal greater Israel project that the rest of the world pretends isn't real, that we wear patches of, that we have conferences about.

Starting point is 01:55:36 But then Western media says, you're a conspiracy theorist and mentioned your alternative ignores it entirely. The Greater Israel Project is exactly what we've always been fighting. And it is Syria. It is Lebanon. It is Gaza. It is globalism. It is at least part of what I see as the technocratic agenda. And as I said, oh, sorry, this is just me.

Starting point is 01:55:54 It is translated, so I posted it in case it was not translating for people. Just understand what this shows you. This is the bigger picture. And Israel will achieve this, and that's what he just said. We have goals that we're going to achieve. And that's what we're talking about. Donald Trump, meanwhile, because he totally wants peace, says, we're loaded up for the next conquest.

Starting point is 01:56:13 Same the tweet we showed you, but same idea. That's what he put out. Next conquest is coming. Peace president. Lastly, as we showed you, a second ago, Reuters, the United States has now deployed more than 50,000 troops across the Middle East, with numbers continuing to surge. Thousands of Marines are being rapidly transferred to San Diego straight into the region.

Starting point is 01:56:32 So already showing you that what Iran said with no more troops is already been violated so that this is guaranteed, in my opinion, to go, you know, the way Israel wants it to, I argue. I mean, I shouldn't say guaranteed. You know, anything's in the air, but I think it's very likely. So hope you got some more information from that, that hoped that opened your eyes to some of this stuff. But guys, we're being misled in a hundred different ways. I hope this ends in a way that does not lead to more violence, more death of innocent people.

Starting point is 01:56:58 But I think that's likely, unfortunately, because we just showed you, they have no intention of stopping this. And Trump, all he seems to do is spin out and lie and bluster. I don't know why we can't just be real about that after what three weeks of just nonstop lies. I mean, he said countless things that you can prove today are 100% false just in this one conversation. And yet the media, CNN included somehow, I mean, they make fun of him, but not really. really get into it and do like what we're doing. Shows you something, guys. But I need to break off and get ready for my interview.

Starting point is 01:57:29 But thank you for tuning in today, guys. Plan for tomorrow will be to play the interview. But as always, possibly to a show with that when the days we put out an interview, it's up in the air, put it that way. And so you can just count on that. It's the normal process, which we were, what's the right word, that I've been doing, I think I'm doing pretty well out of maintaining the time frame I want to shift into. Largy just for me, not necessarily because I'm like feeling,

Starting point is 01:57:53 beholden anything. Like, I want that. I want it to work because of the continuity of content getting days in a row. But that would include interviews and so on. So maybe tomorrow, possibly. And really honestly, it depends a lot for me on whether there's something like important that I want to focus on that I can maybe jump over and do one focal point, you know. But anyway, I'll be seeing you shortly. Thank you for tuning in. And as always, we don't exist without you. So if you want this to continue, let us know with the support below. I love you all. As always, question everything. Come to your own conclusions. Stay vigilant.

The Last American Vagabond - Israel Again Sabotages Ceasefire, $200B Iran War Budget & Did The Trump Admin Fake A Rescue Mission?

There aren't comments yet for this episode. Click on any sentence in the transcript to leave a comment.