The Last American Vagabond - More Indictments Designed To Fail, Palantir Further Consolidates Control & Iran Calls Trump’s Bluff

Starting point is 00:00:14 God damn army. There's another force applied in combat that we generally don't think of as a weapon of war. That weapon is words. Words are weapon. Calling the truth is to influence people. This is psychological. It starts with a simple question and ends in objective reality. Through our journey from there to hear, we find one another and ourselves.

Starting point is 00:01:22 and as the next 24 hours breaks free from our last, we gaze onward in reflection of the day. Welcome to the daily wrap up. Wednesday, April 29th, 2026. Thank you for joining me today. That clip is another one. Orwell shared that with me before I was, as I was getting set up.

Starting point is 00:01:57 And one I hadn't seen, it's another one of these weird army, that's from the Army, that's the U.S. Army, sciop division promotional videos, which is, you know, it's interesting how this is becoming, I mean, it's clear that we look at them because it's relevant to what we're talking about. But I see these things more prominently pointed to and discussed than normal. And I think that speaks to a lot of different things.

Starting point is 00:02:19 But one of them being that psychological operations, fifth generation warfare, that is the state of reality today. Kinetic warfare is clearly a part. I don't think it will ever, you know, it will always be something that's ever present for potential circumstances, but that's not the reality of warfare today. And it's just a weird, and what that suggests of what they're doing, really what we know that they're doing. I mean, an interesting point that stands out that words are weapons.

Starting point is 00:02:45 Now, not so the same as words are violence. And words are very clearly or can be used in a, in a weaponized way. But it's an interesting thing to be said right now. Well, I'll point to it today about just in one of the many brief points, we'll highlight about the, you know, a lot of the. things will get to the hate speech point from Trump, yet again, arguing that hate speech is a problem. The left, the left's hate speech. That's the problem. Well, it's in any, if anybody's not blinded by partisanship, that's the same point you attack on the left. That is not okay. That's unconstitutional

Starting point is 00:03:16 and it will be used against everybody. Today, what I'm going to highlight other, we're going to, we're going to update with what's happening in regard to Iran, as I pointed out the, which that statement about Trump calling Ron's bluff is really what's been going on Iran calling Trump's bluff. I think that's what I just said, make sure I had to say it backwards, has been that way since we've been covering this and since it became pretty clear where we were, you know, so many weeks into this. I think that's been the way it's been kind of set at the entire time. There's been little deviations, Trump lying about something or somebody claiming they would offer them what they wanted to bring him to the table and then, you know, and we're going to get

Starting point is 00:03:50 the updates of where that's at today. But with a couple of recent points of what just happened over the last couple of days, I think it's an important thing to realize that that that seems to be exactly where we are, where Iran is standing its ground, like I believe was the case, and I think it's even further been fleshed out. And it's even coming through U.S. talking points that it's not what the U.S. government was saying. Iran can last out a lot longer than the United States governments. And that's becoming very clear. Now, I'm not saying I can prove that. That's my opinion. And I think that's what the evidence shows. But who knows, maybe we're wrong. Maybe the U.S. has something we don't know about. That's why it's important to say it that way. But what's interesting

Starting point is 00:04:26 is that it's even now being discussed by the people who, you know, we're for a long time holding the line about why the U.S. is stronger and better and everything else. And it's, it's, and of course the embarrassing part of it that you all see, anybody who's not lying can tell that he's been lying. Trump has been manipulating or being lied to. And he must be aware of that if he's being lied to and it still continues. They begging for a deal.

Starting point is 00:04:48 You know, now they don't even have a state. They don't even know who's in charge. They're about to collapse. And yet we, they better do the thing or they're not going to get the bad stuff. It's just, it's hard to watch, guys. But what this leads to is, you know, where the inevitable next step comes to, whether that's Israel forcing this or Donald Trump, taking a step back. Those are the two likely things that I see happening and both could actually happen one

Starting point is 00:05:10 after the other, but it's an interesting point to get into about where we are and what that means for the future of the global dynamic. Now, thank you for the gifted subscriptions there. I appreciate that. I just happen to see it in the chat. Now, we're going to talk about that. And it relates to a lot of the things we're going to discuss that. be the end part of the show today.

Starting point is 00:05:27 But what I wanted to get into today, for the larger part of this, there's a lot. I mean, probably more topics than we usually even cover in a show, but in a kind of rapid fire segment, essentially, and it's kind of the way we've been doing it before. But what I want to start with today in general is basically some of the things that have been happening, many of which you already know of, that are, you know, contradictions to what were promised to the MAG of people. Now, we've done that to death, and it's still going to be important as a continues to be shown because I still think there are honest people that are swayed by this or

Starting point is 00:06:00 you know who see what he's doing but get pulled back in because of a certain narrative and I want people to be aware of how many times that you've been lied to and how many times you've been double crossed and in fact going the opposite direction no different than the previous Democrat administration if you're paying attention but I want to go through this for a reason and show you and some many that you probably haven't seen and how this relates to one where we currently are with the I mean why the the amount of blunders I could point to are insane It's so many different things that this government left or right, but currently this administration is completely floundering in,

Starting point is 00:06:32 Iran war being one of them, and what a lot of this is being done to, you know, well, first, the point of the deflections around that to get you to look anywhere else. I think that's where the indictment part of this comes in. We're going to talk about the new indictments, which seem to be exactly like the last time, and I'm sure I'll get pushed back for that,

Starting point is 00:06:48 like I did last time. We'll see where it ends up. I hope they go to jail. But there's also the point I want you to see of the things that are happening to continue to show you that you're not, getting what you were promised. Then I kind of said that poorly, but then why all these other things are being done to keep you from seeing all of these terrible things. And then sort of in a bigger higher elevation view, how this all fits into where I see this going, which is just different

Starting point is 00:07:10 to just sort of showing you the different things or how they're all trying to deflect from what's going on, which I do in passing. But I think today I want to make this more of an important focal point and related to what's going on in regard to the indictments, which we'll go through in this. with the the Fauci adjacent one if you haven't seen that which i just think you know you know my opinion about where these things go i really hope even these people go get held accountable even for the ridiculous things they're trying to charge them for which are not what you may think i just don't think they will and i think that's been pretty clearly shown that that's what this administration's been doing but we'll also talk about comie and the guy's name is dr david merens i

Starting point is 00:07:46 believe M-R-M-R-M-R-O-R-E-N. We'll also talk about the conversation being floated around Clinton yet again. And you're anyone and, you know, Grassley's memo to the DOJ, which seems to be doing nothing about or that they seem to be doing nothing about. But all of this coming out right now to get people to think something's happening. And again, I genuinely hope, but we see some momentum in this because these people, whether they're being got, you know, whether they're going after with the reasons I think they should, I believe they're criminals. And I mean that, guys. That's not some kind of a passing

Starting point is 00:08:20 partisan point to make it look like I'm being equal. I mean, anyone that follows this show longer than yesterday to today knows very well, even just yesterday. This is not about one side of the other. We've been consistent in our criticisms and our logic about both sides of the paradigm for a very long time. Now, we're also going to talk about beyond that, how this overlaps with the kind of, like I said before, the things they're doing that are challenging what they promised, but that gets into the, you know, again, like I said, how it connects to the larger part of the agenda and how these are being used in real time. But things that have, for example, with the Maha conversation that you guys have seen, like the glyphosate fluoride, food dies, and all things we talked about,

Starting point is 00:08:59 and some updates on that in regard to specifically the Roundup and glyphosate and a Supreme Court case, which you're going to, it's not going to surprise you paying attention, but it's frustrating to see where this continues to go. A good post from Zen Honeycott about the farm bill. All these are, you know, each one of these points you could do a 30-minute show on and get in depth in this, but it's, it's just wild to see all of these lined up next to each other and then pretend like, honest people aren't calling this out, left or right. Lithium, an important point we're going to talk about, which it's amazing to me where this seems to be going and how these narrow, like suddenly we were fighting for lithium mining in the United States as the right,

Starting point is 00:09:38 even though that was supposed to be with the, you know, the challenging the direction of the fossil fuels and the, you know, these things are just flip-flopping. shows you is that there's really not two sides when it comes down to it. It's just about control and using the two sides to get you where they need you to be. We'll talk about the National Science Foundation and the firing of the entire body for the most part. I mean, yet that's what basically dissolved or removed everybody within it. It still exists. But some of it happened before. The point is where this seems to be going. Now, we should be skeptical of the made, you know, industrial. I mean, anything the government's putting forward, science or

Starting point is 00:10:11 otherwise, that's just logic. But what this seems to be is something other than, you know, it's like using the just the people that are newly concerned about just, you know, like during COVID-19, people became very skeptical of science. And I think there's a reason to be, but there is an overreaction as well. And I think that might be part of what drives that or manipulating people for it. We'll talk about AI and Palantir, something that continues to just explode and gets very little conversation. I honestly don't even know why.

Starting point is 00:10:37 I mean, you know, I all say right out of the gate, because I think people have covered it to death. That's what's so frustrating about a lot of this stuff is that we all, it's everybody seems to know about it. So, oh, the new thing, bad thing, Palantir just did. And it just seems like, well, yeah, we all know. That's terrible. And they're going to, they're controlling our lives. They're surveilling everything. And so there's a disconnect there. Right. So it's, and then people get, you know, you want to look for the new story that people are going to be interested. I'm going to about myself. I'm trying to make sure I stay focused on some of these older stories. But even I can

Starting point is 00:11:04 feel that. Right. And the interesting point about this is that we continue to cover these things to such a degree that everyone seems to see it, but yet the mainstream lies about that awareness, but there's no accountability. I don't want to dive into that right now to start, but I always bump up against that. I want us to think about what that is right there. Part of this will always be information flow and talking about it and get people aware, but there needs to be something other than, okay, now government go, do something, government, stop the thing that you're doing, right?

Starting point is 00:11:31 Government step in to stop the government from doing the thing government's doing. That's never going to happen anymore, guys. And so we need to think about how we effectively change these things. But Palantir is a big part of this right now. And then generally how this relates to the larger conversation of foreign policy, Iran, technological change, where it all seems to be going. Quite a lot to talk about today. Now, I want to first again highlight what we were doing or what we are doing on substack now,

Starting point is 00:11:55 which is just simply posting the daily wrap-up on there. I wanted you guys to see that as well as case you don't know, we do have our substack. And right now, the only thing, thing, I'm planning on maybe bringing some more stuff back. Like, you know, as at last, the person who was previously helping me run this who basically just kind of dropped off, didn't, I didn't know that was going to come. So I wasn't prepared to take over this at the time. And so I basically just tried to like basically we were doing something where people were able to meet up with us once a week or a month. I forget what it was. And I just, there was just too much at the moment. And so I had

Starting point is 00:12:27 to kind of put that off. But there was, right now there's no like benefits for signing up for a substap. Whereas most of our platforms, we don't really offer. it's about trying to support the platform, right? You believe in us, sign up and pay for subscription, which helps TLAV if you want to otherwise, it's all free, like everything else we do. But on that note, if you want to support TLAV, you can sign up for either a smaller donation part or a yearly subscription and become one of the members. And with that, the one thing right now that I am consistently doing is you get all over interviews early. Sometimes for time, maybe like 10 minutes early, but if not, I try to do it earlier than that. And so you get inside, you know,

Starting point is 00:13:04 you get to look at the interviews before anybody else. Even though it is free in public, this point is that not everyone sees it. They're waiting for the platform. So know that, but if you want to support us, this is a good way to do it because I do, at least so far,

Starting point is 00:13:16 there are rumblings about where substack goes, and I am concerned about that too. Direct donation through mail is usually the best way to go right now. But we have two great interviews that I posted on here as well as the site and everywhere else, but I just want to make sure you guys saw that. So another way to support us. But those interviews,

Starting point is 00:13:33 which I really, I thought we're really, you know, important ones to you to watch. This one was Ian Davis, one that I've been waiting to get done. It's just waiting to have, rather, because it's just he is knocking this conversation out of the park. And he's been researching this for quite a long time. His book is called The Technocratic Dark State. Ian Davis interview, The Technocratic Dark State, and the Network State agenda.

Starting point is 00:13:53 Now, we've been talking about the network state for almost capital, Prospera, and a lot for quite a while, and it's very concerning to me. 24, 24, maybe, you know, two years plus. I forget when I first started. This goes into it pretty deep, and he really does talk about, I mean, the simple point here is that, guys, this is the great reset.

Starting point is 00:14:10 That's what this is. This is the great reset with a different angle, different flavor, the end game, the metrics, the, you know, digital ID, the survey, all of the same things are being met

Starting point is 00:14:22 with different agendas. So I just really need people to recognize that. And who knows? Maybe everyone does, except for the fake people to pretend that no one does. But I'm still going to keep talking about it like no one knows about it because we need, you know, until I can verify that because I'm going

Starting point is 00:14:36 to do my job. And that's to get people aware of where this goes. And so this is not just the network state part of it. But unfortunately, Ian sees the same things that I do in where this goes. But it's one major part of where this goes in this massive technological transition. The image we use for today, by the way, on that note, which is just kind of humorous, I already got a comment from somebody. That wasn't something I made from AI, by the way. That was an image that I found online that could have been made by AI. It looks like something that could have been made that way. remember these graphic designers and people made these kind of images a long time before we had AI.

Starting point is 00:15:07 I'm just only saying that because we recently talked about that. And I understand the concerns. I'm not going to get into it all today again, but I just find it funny that I find this image and, you know, end up using it and someone says, you know, hey, yeah, and I don't know. But either way, the point is that image you're seeing, that's the Palantir eye. It's just hilarious to me and also alarming that they're using something that is, you know, funny. I understand the reality of the meet those of the books of Lord of the Rings, but the average perception is that this is something used by evil wizards to surveil or spy on people,

Starting point is 00:15:38 as well as Anderil and all these different overlaps with these names. It's just weird to me. But so point being, these companies, it's something, and it's just one part of what we can see of what they're all doing. We will get into that more in depth today. Also,

Starting point is 00:15:51 a great follow-up with Bibu Def Misra, who's the author of Yuga Shift. He's a very well researched, you know, what was, I believe, He's, I'm forgetting his actually his title right now. He's a researcher, academic.

Starting point is 00:16:06 He's been doing this a long time. He's got lots of credentials. And the guy is very just, it blows me away. I think I said it like four times in the interview. I'm just so fascinated by his ability to be able to sort of very accurately weave together the meathes with the science. I don't know many people that do that. And I find this so insightful because it shows you, for example,

Starting point is 00:16:26 the idea of like you could take this to Bible and Noah and the flood and so on. And that's that's the, the, the, the, the, the, the, the, the, the, the, the, around it, right? And the story connects literally to a timed cataclysm, basically a, a point in the world where you can map out whether carbon dating or otherwise that we've had these cataclysms every so many thousands of years. And so it's interesting that you could argue that, you know, what was written about something like that. Either way, the point was in, in his book, in our interviews, this is part two, he goes into that about the idea of, of how, you know, the comments that you can prove, these

Starting point is 00:17:00 different scientific things. I forget what he called it. There's a certain constellation element that has started giving off these lights that hasn't happened in thousands of years. And you can verify that. And this is something that's been related to the changing of consciousness. And these are like scientific discussions. But then he goes into how over history it's been discussed as, you know, the mythos around it and the different legends that we tell ourselves. It's just very interesting. And the bigger point as the title reads is do world leaders expect a cataclysm? and is there a shift currently underway? The positive note, the way he sees what's happening in the world right now,

Starting point is 00:17:34 I mean, it's wild, by the way, if you check out our last interview. I mean, I would argue it's not that hard to see where this was going, but he wrote the book a while ago, and he basically predicted where this current situation would be, not necessarily Trump, but that we will be watching this sort of decline in what they're doing, and it's just very interesting. But on top of that, that he, in his mind, the way he's reading this is that after about 20, 45 or whatever,

Starting point is 00:17:57 and it's just his estimate. He argues that will begin what he, what the mythos of the background argues is a thousand years apiece. Who knows what that means and the reality of things, hey, but a positive note that I think is worth considering since we're so much negativity today. Anyway, interesting conversation. And you know me,

Starting point is 00:18:14 especially with stuff like this, I think it's important to stick to what we can prove, which I talk about with him in this conversation. So don't think this is some sort of, you know, woo-woo, trying to get your attention with end-time's conversations. That's just not what I do. I find this to be very, relevant and you will find interesting to real-world things happening today, backed up by science

Starting point is 00:18:34 overlapped with the different mythos around it. Very interesting. This guy, somebody should check out. Read his book. Found it very powerful. Now, in case you didn't see this, just happened. Also share with me before I got started, and I will bring this back up in another point in the show today. But as Justin Amash points out, FISA 702 unfortunately just passed the house. This bill lets the government search Americans' private communications without a warrant in direct violation of the Fourth Amendment. Don't blame the GOP alone, as usual, guys, because 42 Democrats betrayed the American people to help Mike Johnson pass it. Yeah, hashtag two-party illusion. Now, this passed the Senate, which I guarantee this will do. This is going to pass because your government wants it, guys,

Starting point is 00:19:16 that's the sad part. And what did Trump and the rest of them do when they had the other side to make it look like they were going to do something different? They couldn't stop criticizing why this is the worst thing in the world. And it is. It creates a situation where your government can illegally spy on you with no, it's unconstitutional. That's what you have to understand today. If you believe in the constitution, and I understand, we can have a conversation if we think as a collective in this country, we want to just move forward and forget about that. I don't if we're stuck in this state of society. But understand that if you are in the mind that this is something that matters, you can't then go, but this and narrative and justification, constitutional or not, is all.

Starting point is 00:19:54 that matters within that conversation. And so like, we'll get into it a minute about, now I'm forgetting the term, geo-fencing warrants, which we'll talk about in this very conversation of Palantir. Well, they're now using these things to say, well, that guy has some suspicion, which then gets them enough to get a warrant for that person. But then they open up this geo-fencing idea around that person and end up absorbing all of your information if you just happen to be walking down the street by them. It's a real thing. And using that information and your personal doubt. I mean, it's like we're even pretending anymore that they care about those things. But the problem here is that this is, you know, violating your rights.

Starting point is 00:20:34 And so what they're doing is saying, but we're stopping crime. And you know what? I don't even, let's just even say that they were, crime ceased to exist because they were doing that. Okay. Then you can either make one of two, one of two choices. You can say, I care about the Constitution, therefore, that doesn't matter. Or you can say, well, the Constitution matters, but this more important, so we're going to move beyond the Constitution and make up something new. But you can't start going, but this, because shall not be infringed means something. Because once you open that door, which guess what, guys, we did a long time ago. Fire in a theater.

Starting point is 00:21:09 Then they can kick it open, which is what they're doing now. But overall, recognize this was always what the U.S. government, all of it wanted. They just wanted you to think that part of them left, right, whatever is in the moment, part of them fought for you. but failed just so you don't stop letting them control your life. Right? Maybe if I support them now, they'll win the next time. No, they won't because they're not fighting for you. I'm sorry to be so pessimistic, but guys, history shows us where we actually are.

Starting point is 00:21:37 Now, one quick point about the Southern Poverty Law Center, Ken Silva points this out, and he's been done doing good work on this for a while. This is so interesting to me, and this is actually perfect for this larger conversation around the sort of design to fail distractions, I guess, but based on real things, which is like Comey and the rest, who are criminals, who should go to jail, but are not going to, in my opinion, because they're using things they know will fail, which either shows you that they're working together when it really matters, or for some weird reason they don't want to go after the person who they told you is their enemy,

Starting point is 00:22:09 who broke the law, by the way, in this case, the whole Southern Poverty Law Center thing was, it was ridiculous when you look at the reality of what they were actually doing. The truth that both sides of our government were funding opposition groups, the same like the Azov movement in foreign policy like the moderate rebels the same thing they do here or by the way the new information that just came out showing that the Israeli government was literally funding the settler movements which we already knew or as it wasn't it wasn't the government I forget it with bottom line was the settled room was refunded to be the very radical things they were being to justify their outcome that's what these governments do

Starting point is 00:22:43 what home abroad they fund the worst of the worst to get you anywhere that to use that thing to coerce people to where they want them to be including you today so in this case, Southern Poverty Law Center is wrapped up with all kinds of things that I believe was worthy of investigation. Weirdly enough, though, they only hyperfocus specifically on money laundering and wire fraud overlaps, which good if you're actually going to do something about it, and then only seem to focus on specific things. Like, for example, the unite the right conversation, which is about the Ozov movement, which if you really want to get into that, which I've done extensively is literally, provably, according to the FBI, is the U.S. arm of the Ozav movement,

Starting point is 00:23:21 and they're the ones that were the leading element through that Charlottesville March, including the people that actually put it on. Now, in this case, for ever reason, everyone on the right started talking about the Patriot Front, which I agree. It's also a construct, in my opinion. Doesn't mean everyone involved is aware of that. But what was interesting to me is that they all focused on that when that was not something named in this indictment.

Starting point is 00:23:45 But what was important to understand, as Ken points out here, which our background work has been calling out the entire time, the Southern Poverty Law Center also disclosed today that it provided the feds with information about a member of the now defunct America Vanguard, or excuse me, Vanguard America, all of which I've shown you are interconnected through people through funding,

Starting point is 00:24:03 which later splintered and became the Patriot Front. Vanguard, as you will recall from our meeting, documents established the Southern Poverty Law Center's involvement in alerting law enforcement to criminal activity in connection with his efforts to obtain a national security clearance for which he was charged, convicted, and jailed.

Starting point is 00:24:19 As Ken says, the charging papers show that there was at least one FBI informant and an undercover agent in the case. Now we learn that they had a source too. For the end of the day, guys, the reason this will fail is because they're going to argue their informants because that's what they were. But just like the FBI uses informants and then literally creates false flag dynamics, it's the same situation. Because it's an informant, illegally speaking informant doesn't mean that can't be used for illegal purposes, which I believe, and I think we know they are.

Starting point is 00:24:48 but so if you're coming from this that the left did this to you, then you just are literally ignoring all the evidence to focus on one part that, by the way, is designed to not actually stop the problem. I just don't know how many much more clear we can make this. And so what this shows you is that there is actually a connection, but weirdly enough, they seem to have deliberately not made this a point in their actual investigation, or at least when they're talking about it for you. Now, my point is that when it comes to the actual accountability,

Starting point is 00:25:14 whether Southern Lovity Paw Center, I always said, Southern Poverty Law Center, gets shut down, whatever. I find that to be frankly, I mean, a group like this, I argue, should be focused on. But the group going away means nothing in the context

Starting point is 00:25:27 of what this does. They'll make another one. They'll use a different platform. It's about accountability for those involved, and I'm talking about the people, the government. Now, let's just even say you think I'm wrong and it is the Democrats. Well, you let me know when a Democrat gets arrested for this.

Starting point is 00:25:44 You let me know when a politician or anybody of influence gets arrested for this. and I will shake your hand. I doubt it will happen. So as hands, this guy I've been seeing, just forced into my time feed all the time. But I mean, I recently followed him, by the way, because of this kind of inner working.

Starting point is 00:26:00 What I'm trying to make them, like, it's not worth getting into right now. There's a weird little map of like ecosystem on here. You guys all know, you see it. I'm trying to sort of like organize how I see interconnect. I shouldn't even waste my time, to be honest. It's such a, this thing is this. Anyway, like I said, not worth wasting time today.

Starting point is 00:26:15 But this guy. Todd Blanche is on an absolute tear right now. From indicting the SPLC to appointing Joe D Genova as Russia Gates are, all these things again, the Russia gates are like, you know what I mean? Trust me, I'm aware of the crimes that were committed, but they're not aiming at the actual things, guys. This is about, like, we'll get to a James Corme, James Coney, and, oh, he's going down because they charged him because he posted an Instagram post.

Starting point is 00:26:43 Like, I feel, I'm like, you guys must know how stupid that is. We'll come back to it. Also because of how hypocritical it is, by the way. But it says to now go going after the COVID origin fraudsters. Are we really going to talk about the COVID origin fraudsters or Dr. David Moran who worked under Fauci? Really? How about Donald Trump and Joe Biden? You know, that's never going to be what this is.

Starting point is 00:27:08 It's been a relentless run of action all while dealing with the assassination attempt in the middle of it. Yeah. I'm sure you guys are recognizing how ridiculous that story. he is. I may go into it in the next couple of shows. There's some things I pulled aside, like the weirdness of Trump literally admitting he was peeking through the curtains as it happened. I mean, what the hell are we talking about, guys? Yeah, because that makes sense, right? Anyway, I'm not saying I even know for sure one or the other, just like I didn't say about the rest of these, but what we do know is that there's something very off about these. And that is enough

Starting point is 00:27:37 for me, by the way, to recognize just as a tangential thing, that there's something amiss there. And if it's worth going deeper, we'll go deeper. But it's just anyway, like I said yesterday, That story feels designed to increase his influence and to get you looking anywhere else, even if it was an opportunity used, meaning it happened and they used it anyway. But so former senior NIA official indicted and for concealing federal records during COVID pandemic. Even that statement makes a sound much worse than what you actually read and what they put out. I honestly think this will go nowhere. Jen, I'll show you why.

Starting point is 00:28:12 But let me put it this way before you can get into it. And I mean that. I think this is designed to fail. even if it somehow works, why is this what we think makes sense? Why would this guy be the one? It's always an underling. It's always somebody who is not necessarily the, it's not the person who is guiding the operation.

Starting point is 00:28:29 It's, you know, it's the Epstein, by the way, of the real problem. Epstein was not the one running things, guys. Are we actually pretending that's the case? It's always, and then we pretend like he killed himself on top of that. But Liz Churchill and all the rest, arrested, they write. No, not what happened, actually. former Fauci aide, Dr. David Mrenz, has been charged with conspiring. He's been charged, yeah, it's an indictment, which, by the way, is not a proof of anything.

Starting point is 00:28:52 It's actually just a charge, which they actually finally got correct, as opposed to saying, we got him. He's guilty. He's going down. But they argued arrested. Not what happened. Same thing here. Mickey Willis, this is the guy who is behind the pandemic platform. He just writes, this is huge.

Starting point is 00:29:06 And I'm sure he probably means this. This will lead to actual justice. And will Fauci be next? Well, I doubt either of those things. I hope so, by the way. MK Truth Ultra says, Kaboom and the red light. That's how you know it's important, guys.

Starting point is 00:29:20 Fouchy, Anthony Fauci, collage, what is that, colleague, excuse me, David Marens has been arrested. That's what I'm getting at. Arrested. Well, no. As far as I can tell,

Starting point is 00:29:31 that's not what happened. Now, unless you want to try to do what you always do in partisanship and sort of warp that word into some weird version of how it's just, well, he was indicted and they charged him with, so that's arrested in the sense of the legal,

Starting point is 00:29:43 no, it's not, guys. Arrested as we all would know, means he was taken into custody and put in jail. That's not what happened. David, Dr. David M. Moran, 78, this is from the White House Post or the office of the U.S. Department of Justice, is charged with conspiracy against the United States, destruction, alteration, or falsification of records. It's funny house is ore.

Starting point is 00:30:06 I didn't notice that before. So are you gambling? I mean, what you recognize with a lot of these Trump administration efforts is that you're, like, fishing. These are not meant to be fishing when you do. do this, right? There's more to be found, but if this is interesting how they, that's just a side note that I just off the top my head because I saw that and think of it earlier, but recognize how these others have gone where they sort of like find something. And he's said that.

Starting point is 00:30:28 So if it's destruction, alteration or falsification, doesn't that seem to suggest that you're not sure or it could be? That's worth pointing out. We'll find out, I'm sure. But let's just go and give it to them because I believe that this stuff is going on or had gone on. falsification of records in federal investigations, concealment, removal, or mutilation of records, and aiding and abetting. Now, what's weird is aiding and abetting, yet for whatever reason, there's nobody else that seems to be involved other than a co-conspirator number two, which is DAZAC, guys. If you think that person's going to go down, it will say something much bigger about what's

Starting point is 00:30:59 happening. I doubt it will happen because that ties into so many other things that tie right back to Trump. Quote, these allegations represent a profound abuse of trust at a time when the American people needed it most, said Todd Blanche, without any sign of irony. During the height of a global pandemic. Oh, it was a global pandemic? Is that what we're still going with? Are we still pretending that that's what happened?

Starting point is 00:31:22 Is that what Trump is telling us? That's Trump's administration. How can you as a Republican who screams what I argue is the right thing, that this was a deception? These things were killing people. And then you can have this team stand up and tell you know it was a real thing. And no, they're helping people. You're still offering, is still offering it to people and act like you don't recognize

Starting point is 00:31:39 that you're being deceived. But the idea that a profound abuse of trust coming from an administration that's, I mean, let's be real about this. A nonpartisan perception of what we just saw and it's not even the full administration. This has to be the most clumsily dishonest administration I've ever seen in my entire life. You know, I haven't done it. I bet you if you ask Rock right now, it would tell you objectively that in the first year of this administration compared to any other first year that there's been more,

Starting point is 00:32:09 more documented lies. It's funny how that keeps happening, and you shouldn't trust Grock, especially because of the platform it comes from. But you can right now ask it, is Alex Jones a deliberate liar? Is he deliberately deceiving you? And what's your opinion, Grock,

Starting point is 00:32:23 based on the evidence at hand? And it will say point blank. Yes, history and record show. He's a deliberate deceiver. Now, I don't know. Grog could be wrong. Funny, though, that it comes from Elon Musk and the whole overlap there.

Starting point is 00:32:33 My point, though, is that there's information that just simply can't be ignored. Now, that you guys have lied to us is pretty objectively obvious, but you're going to stand there and say a profound misuse of abuse of trust. And it says, as alleged in the indictment, Dr. Merenz and his co-conspirators, deliberately concealed information and falsified records in an attempt to suppress alternative theories about the origins of COVID. And see, this is where it comes back to. So if you're still with square one and you're pretending like this was a bat and it was some kind of a breakout, you're lost.

Starting point is 00:33:04 The evidence is clear. Now, there is a manipulation of this. We've talked about that. I've David Martin, I'll play some clips from. There's clear manipulation of this in gain of function research. There's clear manipulation of all sorts of things. But to pretend, by the way, that this was some sort of a breakout thing that happened in a cave or whatever else is the manipulation. There's only two things in my mind that makes sense at all. One, that this was literally manufactured, including the U.S. government and China, with Trump's administration included and everyone else before that, very clearly made this thing. And then you can decide the variations on how it was either given out, released, whatever you want to talk about, or it was entirely an

Starting point is 00:33:43 illusion. Now, that doesn't change the fact that they were working on things in gain of function research. Now, whether you want to argue that's all theater or if you believe their viruses don't exist, which something you should consider, the point is there was something happening in those they were doing something. There was records and funding and whatever else. So my point, though, is clearly with the evidence that we have, it's really undeniable at this point. You can't act like this was some organic breakout of a thing. Or at the very very, at least that China was involved with something that they then covered up. If they covered this up, that's covering up what they worked on.

Starting point is 00:34:16 And that might be why that makes sense. But then I would argue that they'll never actually go through with this because it leads right back to the U.S. government, but Donald Trump as well, like in particular, but also Biden and the whole thing, guys. So it's just interesting, isn't it, that you have Republicans who are the ones yelling this the loudest who are now weirdly supporting an indictment of somebody who's not Fauci, who's what they promised would happen, that Jones swore would happen if we just kept Trump alive,

Starting point is 00:34:42 but now it goes a different direction and actually enshrines the thing that you guys told us wasn't true. How does anybody honest make sense of this? Now, to be clear, by the way, whether you disagree with my framing or not, the point in this case is not about whether I'm right or not, it's about the framing from the government or rather the people that support this current administration

Starting point is 00:34:59 who said otherwise. And now are cheering this. It's about hypocrisy, really. circumventing records protocols with the intention of avoiding transparency is something that will not be tolerated by the FBI, says Cash Patel, circumventing record protocols with the intention of avoiding transparency about something that will, you mean, oh, the next part two, when public officials deliberately circumvent the law to hide their communications from the public, they undermine the public's trust and the integrity of our institutions. That was especially true during COVID-19 when the transparency was needed most. I agree. You know, who else? that exactly speaks to, Cash Patel and Pam Bondi literally hiding their communications exactly what he just said from the Epstein Files release. Funny how nobody cares about that.

Starting point is 00:35:48 How left or right, nobody, not left nobody. Now, I don't even see Massey doing anything, but go after them. That's the, and Todd Blanche is quite literally breaking the law by just continuing to not do that. And so these people going, trust and transparency, how dare you hide communications? it's just ridiculous on its face. Like that, for cash to be saying that he must be looking around going, I hope nobody calls this out. Like, how silly is this?

Starting point is 00:36:14 Which speaks even further to the fact that I think this is not really going to go anywhere. Now, I mean, because you think of it like this. Trump in particular, if this is what he was going to do, what would stop them next time around from doing it right back? And I mean, from his pace of actual accountability. Neither of them want that because it's just an endless cycle of you. And their stick fails. according to the indictment,

Starting point is 00:36:36 Moran's co-conspirator 1, co-conspirator 2, and others conspired during the, so there's two technically, conspired during COVID-19 pandemic to defraud and commit several offenses against the United States. Right. So, you know, what are you saying? Now, this pretends as if the U.S. government was somehow not involved with the thing they were involved with

Starting point is 00:36:55 that you can prove. That's pretty stupid. And it says, and NIH terminated the co-conspirator 1's grant. NIH terminated the grant, understanding the risks of that coronavirus emergence, exactly, DAZAC, based on allegations that COVID-19 emerged from the Wuhan Institute of Aerology, which is not what happened. Like, unless we're talking about something that was literally made and then used, the idea that

Starting point is 00:37:17 that's what happened with some release is just, it doesn't line up with the evidence. And remember, these are the same people that were trying to shove down your throat that it was some pangolin from a food market. Both sides, by the way. NIH awarded the grant to come. Remember, before I go further, remember even the Trump side of this, were the ones telling you, blame China, but it was because of their gross eating habits or whatever.

Starting point is 00:37:38 It's just clear that this is not, this doesn't line up with anything that your team was saying. And I awarded the grant to company one, Cocas Bitter 1, who made a sub-ward to the Wuhan Institute of Orology. Now, going beyond that, there's some clips from Dr. David Martin, just for interesting points to make here that I think are relevant to. This was an interview we had, and he talked about the,

Starting point is 00:37:58 very much believed, by the way, this was something that was created and used or, you know, not some natural thing or some, you know, one-sided thing. Definitely both sides of the pair of the U.S. government and China and whatever else you're involved with. But remember, very much you should be considering that this is, it could be, like, I don't get Denny Rencoo's article or interview about that. Could be something that was entirely deception, which doesn't mean it doesn't exclude the possibility of some pathogen. If you believe that's the reality, but it means that they still faked it based on using PCR test,

Starting point is 00:38:29 falsehoods or, you know, the piece, the, the, I'm blanking on the number all of a sudden, see before you get away from this, the cycle threshold, right, the manipulation of the number, the combination of flu and pneumonia and COVID, all these things. But your first clip, two clips I'll show you. It should be having a public dialogue, and it should be something that rises to the level of legislation. We should not allow the National Institute's Health or the Department of Defense to allocate funding to amplify these agents so that allegedly we can study them in the case that they fall

Starting point is 00:39:01 into the hands of bad people because the evidence has shown us that the bad people who actually have unleashed these pathogens since 1991 and by the way if you go to the miscellaneous memorandum seven and other documents we can go back to the 1950s the bad people who unleash these things on the population are us. It is the U.S. who's doing it. I've been doing this now for 20 years. And one of the things I find frustrating is people pretend like there's this who done it kind of gum shoes sleuthing required to go through and find all the stuff that's the evidence. It doesn't actually take any creativity or effort. This thing was done in plain sight. It was engineered in plain sight. It was publicly announced by 26,

Starting point is 00:39:51 we even knew that it was the Wuhan variant that was the one that they had chosen. Like, there's nothing left to the imagination. We knew that it was WIV1 poised for human emergence, right? This is not a, I wonder if it could be a bat and a panglin going into a bar in Wuhan one night and getting it on and boom, out comes baby COVID. No, we knew in 2016 that the Wuhan Institute of Virology Virus One model was the one that they had selected for the weapon. And so, you know, you sit back and you say, well, how is it that in the face of such egregiously

Starting point is 00:40:30 public information, we still are asking questions about motivation, about whether this was from nature, whatever it is. Listen, people, they said in their own words, this was to hype a drug to get the public to accept something that without terror, the public would have not. never agreed to. That's their words, not mine. And when you have a world in which, as you have on the screen right now, they actually stated outright, biohacking, synthetic coronaviruses, biological warfare enabling technologies, you know, you don't have to interpret that. That doesn't require some spin. When you say biological warfare enabling technology, you are not talking about something

Starting point is 00:41:18 that is an innocent oops who could have known who could have seen it is actually a declaration of war against humanity and we have it in black and white now clearly his opinion right and i think what he's saying is backed up by the evidence but right what the point is always is if you for for example argue that let me go to this one actually first but if you go to the point of or if you argue that viruses don't exist which there's there's evidence to suggest that's possible guys. I just don't argue it's, I feel it's not proven in my opinion, which I get a lot of pushback for it. It's just my opinion. I've looked at what I've been sent. The point is I think there's more to it. But anyway, the point is, if you believe that, which you should question, I'm not saying I think that either.

Starting point is 00:42:08 The point would be that this, or first being that if it is, then that means something was created, not something natural, but it was at his point was something done clearly with the U.S. involved. But if you think it's not the case and they don't exist, well, then you could still argue that this was something that was done, you know, there was a theater, I guess, going on, like what they were doing. They were still funding going on. And that goes back to Denny Rankor's point. But first, this is the interview, the COVID illusion and the criminal world organization, criminal world health organization driving it as Trump creates the new world health organization for the same things. Danny Rancoo's discussion here, data proves this is 2022. Proves COVID-19's action illusion. As I said, doesn't you,

Starting point is 00:42:47 you could argue that it could exist within that very same statement, meaning that you can have something COVID-19, but it was still an illusion because it was manipulated to look like something that wasn't there. Because our argument, though, the data shows that it didn't exist. That doesn't mean it couldn't, right? But the point is that they didn't need something. And that's, you could mathematically show that by using the other points and combining it and showing here's what you could make it look like if you combine flu and pneumonia. If you manipulate the PCR with the cycle threshold, there many of the points we made. Right. And so that's important to think about on top of the fact that he actually followed up with this. We did an interview in

Starting point is 00:43:21 24 where he argues another element of this, when this confounded the people who thought he was more advocating for the no virus point in general, the COVID-19 illusion, biological stress-induced bacterial pneumonia. Now, technically bacterial is not the same thing, but a lot of the pushback from that discussion, many of you probably haven't heard this in a while, from the people that argue that there's no thing as viruses, that bacterial is either an anomaly to that or is part of it. My point is that bacterial, bacteria can get you sick, it can cause symptoms that can spread. So in effect, it's the same difference. And so bacteria does exist and that argues that there can be something like that. Just argue those aren't there. And this is the one doing it.

Starting point is 00:43:57 But his point was simply that there's a thing called biological stress-induced bacterial pneumonia, which is caused by stress. So lockdowns and pressure and fear and it caused that on top of everything else. Very interesting to think about. Now, all that I just want to include, because I find this conversation is fascinating. And it's, I argue, it will come back up. Before we go further in that, though, you know. So the ultimate point is that, oh, well, technically this is the same conversation. But so the, I forgot we were on David Marence for a second. Cut, well, I've going to call me next. It's just this interesting point where you're going to put someone like this on, you know, display indictment. That's it so far. And to act like that feel like, I mean,

Starting point is 00:44:40 okay, you could argue this might go somewhere. Like some of the arguments is maybe he'll throw Fouchy onto the bus. I don't see a word in which that has. happens effectively because this person, you know, honestly because I don't think that's what this is designed to do, but secondarily because that assumes he has something to give up on vouching. But either way, where it goes next? We will wait and I will happily report this person goes to jail if it happens. But shouldn't it be for much bigger crimes as opposed to something that appears to not even be the reality of what the evidence shows? Worth considering, political reports. Three felony counts for allegedly using a

Starting point is 00:45:17 a Gmail account to hide official communications about controversial federally funded projects studying coronaviruses and bats. The indictment was unsealed Monday when Marens made a brief appearance in court and was released on his own recognizance, according to the court record, but arrested, we were told, arrested, dragged into revenue. Nope, didn't happen. These people just will never, you don't even need a lie about this story. You could just go, we did it and we got him, but instead you have to lie on top of it, which is probably by design when you understand what I'm getting at with all this. Like it's almost meant to get people to, it's just, it's very weird where we are. But the point was more, more fake MAGA people lying about what's actually happening.

Starting point is 00:45:54 Fauci, who is not accused of wrongdoing in this case, distance himself from Morens in 2024. Congressional hearing saying he and Marines didn't work closely together. Well, there you go. Whether true or not, the point is that it's already being set up to sort of be the scapegoat, which is what I expected. In fact, for a while, I thought maybe Fauci would be the scapegoat, but doesn't seem to be the case. I argue because if that guy goes, it ties back to everybody. Trump is culpable here, guys. I don't know whether you want to agree with that or not.

Starting point is 00:46:20 It's verifiably the case. So is Biden. So if Fauci goes down, that seems to lead to all of them. I doubt that will happen. The indictment references two unindicted co-conspirators. They are not charged with any crime, which is interesting, and we're not identified by name in the indictment, which seems to suggest to me that Dazek and the rest, that's not going to happen.

Starting point is 00:46:39 Records released in congressional investigations into Marenza's actions indicate that that's Peter Dazzak, a zoologist and former president of the EcoHealth Alliance and Gerald Kuch, a physician and former associate director of Boston University's infectious disease lab. Didn't have time to go deeper on him, but I'm interested in finding out what you find and looking myself. Either way, I kind of don't think that's going to go anywhere. Otherwise, don't you think they'd be mentioned in this? Why would you hide their names if the argument was this was going to lead to them and if they're potentially crapped up in these criminal accusations? Doesn't make sense to me. But here's next order. A former senior advisor to Anthony

Starting point is 00:47:14 Fauci has been indicted for his role in the COVID cover up, this guy might throw Anthony under the bus. What I wanted to really point out was that this is Gunther Egelman. I think I'm calling him Eagle Guntherman. Time to walk out of Fauci next. Every day, Nick says, Fouchie remains free is an injustice. And I said, morons. You know, it's just what do you think is happening? Why wouldn't he be arrested if everything we know is true?

Starting point is 00:47:38 You know, my point is these people don't even seem to care if these people are actually held accountable. otherwise you'd be angry, wouldn't you? I mean, and this is just ridiculous. If you actually read it, you would recognize that doesn't see, other than this hope that maybe he puts him out. You're being played, guys. That's what this feels like to me. It's about trying to get you.

Starting point is 00:47:55 It's a release foul. Is that enough? If I do that, will you ignore the rest? Right? Why are you still talking about Epstein? Like, are we really confused about what's going on today? And as Hans also points out, Dazak is the co-conspirator.

Starting point is 00:48:08 Here he's indictment should be next, which was, you know, publicly posted out. I didn't think we ever see it, but accountability for COVID-O and cover has finally arrived. Has it? Don't you feel like you're jumping the gun a little bit there, seeing as how it hasn't happened yet? It's only maybe happening. An indictment so far have basically all ended up fizzling out.

Starting point is 00:48:25 So that's my point. Why jump, we did it when we have barely just started? Maybe he believes it. Maybe everyone does. But it shows a little bit of a lack of awareness, seeing as how it keeps not happening. I hope so. I hope so. Susie Wiles comes out and post this somewhat related.

Starting point is 00:48:42 You'll see why just on COVID stuff. and she says, I'm joining Twitter to share occasional updates about the work we do at the White House. Oh, boy. Now there is really asset telling you what the government's doing. We are relentlessly focusing on advancing President Trump's agenda and delivering on promises to the American people. I welcome different viewpoints. Follow along for insights. I mean, sort of facetious.

Starting point is 00:48:59 I'm not claiming I can prove that she literally is paid by Israel, but I think it's quite obvious that all these people are in many ways influenced by the Zionist agenda and plenty of other Israeli politics. It's not even secret. They'll tell you that. But the point is, Jicicic. Hi, Susie, welcome to Twitter. Can you tell us, can you, and by the way, the reason it seems you know it's hers because it was given the check and everything like that, even though it's, you know, kind of blanked out. Can you tell us why Brooke Jackson and her FCA complaint is still being blocked by the government? You know, the Donald Trump administration that and Biden, by the way, but currently Trump, who says they're going after the Fauci and the fraud and the COVID-19. Well, the problem is that Brooke Jackson, who exposed the entire thing, is calling out Trump too. That's why you know what's not happening. Asking for 3 million friends, she says. Now, if you don't know, I'm very proud to tell you, yet again, if you didn't hear this,

Starting point is 00:49:53 that we were the first platform to interview Brooke Jackson in a public interview. As usual, there's a major story, and had we been at the level of others are allowed to be seen for the level of at, this story would have been a major, major, major breakthrough in the conversation. But it wasn't allowed. And the very first one was right here. And basically, she had just reached out to the British Medical Journal. had been doing the, there was the public post they made about it. And from that, I reached out to her.

Starting point is 00:50:19 And we spent about two months because she was very worried about doing this, me talking to her, you know, didn't want to pressure, trying to talk with her about what we would talk about. And I did put the work in, guys, and we got this interview out in 2021. Brooke Jackson interview, Pfizer whistleblower exposes cover up calling vaccine data into question. We then followed up with that interview.

Starting point is 00:50:40 I think this was maybe a year later. 2020, Brook Jackson interview, Pfizer reveals concerns with that integrity, vindicating her claims. Now, this was verifiable in the first interview. If there was any justice or any honesty in the media field today, that would have blown that out of the water. Or, by the way, the British Medical Journal posting that they were lying about it should have been enough, don't you think? But the point is that this was, it was very clear all the way back then. We followed up again, Pfizer trial that ended up happening. this is 2023, I believe, reveals big pharma includes FDA and CDC seen as too big to fail.

Starting point is 00:51:16 All this was there. We already know where we're at, guys. Now, some of these include her name as a tag for other conversations. And then, of course, we did the one in 2025. Fork Jackson interview, meet the new boss, same as the old boss. Because they are not letting this happen. They are literally stopping her from exposing their shit. Why do you think that would be?

Starting point is 00:51:35 It's obvious. That's what she's asking about. I just want to make that clear, guys, that people recognize. that this government is not on their side. It's not about left or right. It's about something much bigger. Senator Ron Johnson says, today I released a report showing that Biden health officials, which, by the way, for being honest, it would be the U.S. government. It would be both Trump and Biden, because what he's pointing to quite literally happened across both administrations, but I guess every politician's a politician. Safety signals for COVID-19 injections,

Starting point is 00:52:04 injuries were being hidden by their veers out analytics. Are we pretending that was only Biden? Are we serious? By the way, it's literally still happening. They were shown an updated algorithm that signaled serious adverse events, but they'd refuse to use it. Yeah, I agree. Put him in jail. But as five times August, I think rightly points out, too bad, potish won't do anything about it. I argue yet again because he's like provably culpable for all of that. So I just think it's frustrating.

Starting point is 00:52:32 And worth pointing out that these people continue to point out things that need to happen while nothing ever happens. Now, you guys see that, I'm sure. But there are people out there that still need to become aware. of that. James Comey. James Comey surrenders to authorities after DOJ indictment. Now, of course, what gets posted about this is because it was accurate that they put it in, which by the way I find insane, they put this out on the indictment that he was to be arrested as opposed to just, you know, some indictments are just, you know, turn yourself

Starting point is 00:52:59 in is not explicitly to be arrested. And this is for a post on Instagram. Frankly, I don't care what it said. This shouldn't be happening. It's a post on Instagram. is this are we pretending it's not free speech now i can point out there are things that you would argue cross the line even things that within the current ridiculous system would even be illegal but i'm of the mind that there's a thing called free speech that's constitutional and nothing

Starting point is 00:53:24 else matters on top of the fact that what he did we'll get into is insanely stupid to me that they would ever make this into anything that would go anywhere and that's the point because it's designed to fail it's a very hard thing especially with it basically with intent is the only thing that matters. Good luck proving that. It's all going to be subjective and it's going to come down to an opinion. It's designed to fail. Do you realize how much this man can be charged with? Even from what you guys claim from just, I'm talking for a part of a team sport Republican side, what Trump tells you he did. Why aren't you charging for all those things? Don't you just screen relentlessly about how this guy broke the law in a million ways? Why is this what you're charging

Starting point is 00:54:04 with? I know, I'm beating a dead horse. I'm hoping it reaches people that need to hear it. James Comey surrendered to authorities, and the point was he was, you know, this big claim, he was to be arrested. Well, he just simply walked and turned himself in. There wasn't some big show. It's just like, and yet that's what you get framed as some kind of major thing. And it was indicted him for the second time. Comey subsequently deleted the post and apologized, saying he didn't realize the numbers were associated with violence, which I think is stupid. Everyone knows what that mean. And he posted it for an obvious reason.

Starting point is 00:54:33 Still doesn't change the reality of this. You can't necessarily prove that he meant it to be go kill. that person, maybe he just meant get him out of here. Fire him because that is how that term can be used. I'm not going to say I know for sure, but I say it's stupid to pretend he doesn't know what it means. James Comey indicted again this time over seashell Instagram post. When all this started, you get all these people screaming about how great this is and we're not even aware of what's actually happening.

Starting point is 00:54:56 As outlined in the short, three-page indictment, Comey faces one charge of threats against the president. That's what we're charged. That's what you're charging with. Threats against the president? Well, we'll get to the point where Jack Pesoneman. did it to Biden and plenty of other examples. But no, that doesn't matter.

Starting point is 00:55:11 You say fascist, that means you're going to kill us. Well, here is Miller calling them all fascist 30 seconds before that. You guys are a joke, guys. That's what we were to say that. That she wasn't directed at all of you. You guys here, political politicians and Trump and Biden, you're a joke. Saying that to everybody to listen. The end of the day, guys, you know, it's just so ridiculously on its face, obvious.

Starting point is 00:55:32 And that's my point about why everybody I think can see this, other than the team sports screaming air on fire, morons who are just doing anything they can to get one more person to maybe hold back from criticizing Trump just for a moment because maybe it'll work out. That's where I think this is. And the idea of a threat, right? I mean, it's just if they're like deliberately crossing lines that were drawn in opposition to the left about free speech, about, I mean, any number of things. Social media was a huge part of that. And now we're just turning right around. I mean, that's my point, guys. is this is obvious to people who have principles.

Starting point is 00:56:10 Prosecutors in the indictment say the post constitutes a threat that any reasonable recipient who is familiar with the circumstances, oh, okay, very, very subjective, would interpret as a serious expression of an intent to do harm to the president. Nobody would do that. Even with Comey, even with somebody who publicly hated that person. Because in any context, you're not going, I'm going to come to your door and kill you.

Starting point is 00:56:32 You may think that, but that's insane. That's the anomaly. The point is that somebody's going, You know, this is even say they genuinely want that person to die. They're just basically expressing hatred. And look, we'll put it this way. If you went online right now, and I know there are currently laws in place because this is what they do to manipulate the circumstance that say you're not allowed to threaten the president.

Starting point is 00:56:53 And maybe even think that's a justifiable law. The point is, if you actually create violence against a person, president or not, that's a crime. If I stand up and say, I want to kill somebody, that's not a crime. That's free speech. even though we've been tortured everything. Now, I'm not justifying or advocating. I would criticize somebody for saying something like that because it's a, you know, what's the right word for it?

Starting point is 00:57:15 I would just think it's distasteful. You're what, you know, you're, anyway, the point is that regardless of my opinions on it, that's called free speech. And the reason I'm drawing that line like with fire in a theater is because we have to go back to this. Otherwise, we're lost, guys. And so, but now, okay, it's because, well, he's president. There's some serious and, you know, natural security. And, okay, maybe you even agree with that.

Starting point is 00:57:34 The point, nonetheless, is he didn't do that. I'm simply saying that as a person to type that out, put it on Twitter, which, by the way, go look it up. It's all over Twitter. It's all over every platform, but they only care when it's somebody they want to use, in fact, to not go after him. How funny is that? The point, though, is that it would be free speech under every meaning of the term.

Starting point is 00:57:55 And it says, where was I, prosecutors? It says, nothing has changed with me. Comey posted online response to the indictment, echoing what he said after the previous indictment was thrown out last year. As I told you, it would be, by the way. we talked about it right here. The illusion of Comey and James, this was Letitius James indictments.

Starting point is 00:58:13 That was 2025 October. Well, well, well before it was clear that everybody else was saying it was going to go away. He says, I'm still innocent. I'm not, he's not in plenty of other ways. I'm still not afraid and I still believe this is independent federal judiciary. So let's go. He says, but it's really important that all of us remember this is not who we are as a country. This is not how the Department of Justice is supposed to be.

Starting point is 00:58:37 and the good news is we get closer every day to restoring those values. Keep the faith. Great. So because of this absurdly cartoonish administration, you're making James Comey look like a rational person. Good job. Well done, Donald Trump administration, for allowing this person to take the right stance

Starting point is 00:58:52 in opposition to your absurdity, as opposed to just actually charging him with the crimes that he's actually guilty of and actually putting him in jail. What a funny thing. But apparently I'm the Democrat for wanting Comey in prison for the things you promised to put him in prison for? weird how we're in. I just think it's such a cartoonishly broken thing we're in right now,

Starting point is 00:59:12 where that can be, that's what I'm getting called. This just cracks me up. At a press conference announcing the charges, acting attorney general Todd Blanche argued that Comey's post crossed the line between First Amendment protected speech and speech that warrants prosecution. See, right there, he's telling you that there's speech that requires prosecution,

Starting point is 00:59:32 that there's things you can say that mean you can be charged with the crime. Isn't that what we all fought against the left? Yeah, guys, it really was. They are the same thing with a different justification. I know you can see it. Now, again, you may argue that there are some things that are too far. And you can have that opinion. We can debate about it. But if you argue that, then you need to either argue that the Constitution is no longer valid because we are allowed to change it when we want to, or that's not allowed simply because it is unconstitutional. Only two logical arguments in that conversation. I guess you could make. maybe say, well, to make this clear not to go too deep on it, because it's always a point that's relevant, but it's a lot to talk about. You want to alter, right? You want to change the amendment to where you can, except for these things. Okay. The point, though, is Maybury versus Madison and numerous other Supreme Court rulings. If it's repugnant to the Constitution, it's Nolan void. So an amendment can be passed, but if it were pugnant to the original document, it's Nolan void, legally speaking, even though we have tons of it.

Starting point is 01:00:35 of those things because this government is broken. So to go in there and say, you're a lot, you know, shall not be infringed except for this, well, that repugnant to the original sit. That's the point, guys. So that's like back to my point. There's only really two valid arguments to make right there. It says it's not very difficult to look at. And it's not, in my mind, a difficult line for one to cross over, one way or the other.

Starting point is 01:01:00 So basically what he's saying is it's very, you might not even know when you've crossed that line. Doesn't that sound perfect for the government to? wants to accuse people of crimes for what they disagree with. But he goes, we cannot, you are not allowed to threaten the President of the United States of America. Well, again, free speech matters to me. That's not my decision. That's Congress's decision.

Starting point is 01:01:19 Well, if Congress passes a law that's Republican to Constitution, yeah, we already went over that. And a statute that had that they passed that we charge multiple times a year, asked about the evidence in the case beyond the social media post itself. Blanche claimed there's been a quote, tremendous amount of investigation into the Facebook post, okay? And he goes, but did not elaborate on what the evidence showed. Okay, clear.

Starting point is 01:01:41 We're doing a lot of good work. We looked at it online and we, yep, that's the one. Got it. That's it. Done. Investigation over. Blanche repeatedly stood by the decision to seek the indictment, saying the government would, quote, never tolerate and prosecute anyone who violates

Starting point is 01:01:56 federal law, regardless of the title or stats, except all of these examples we can laugh about together, ridiculous people. But so, I was going to say right there. Blanche claimed there's been a tremendous non-investigation. Blanche stood by the decision to seek the indictment. There was one point I was going to make right there, but did not elaborate. Oh, that's what it was.

Starting point is 01:02:17 So basically the investigation as well, I guarantee you it's going to be like supplementary points that aren't even relevant to whether or not he posted that with the intent. By saying, look, look over here where he said these mean things about Trump. Okay. It doesn't mean that you could prove he meant that then in that moment. It's just such a game. But what you're going to do is going to be this process.

Starting point is 01:02:36 of people and testimony about Comey, hates this and Mike, I heard when I was in the bathroom that he said he wanted to kill Trump, it's going to be stupid. And if we even get there, I bet you it doesn't even happen. Now, I want to reiterate again for those that maybe just tuned in, he's a criminal and he should go to jail.

Starting point is 01:02:53 My point is that they don't seem to care about that or don't want it for whatever reason. Others, however, this is the important part. Others have used 86 nomenclature, including Democratic Michigan Governor, Gretchen Whitmer, who appeared during a 2020 television interview with a small figurine at the numbers 8645. Anything about that.

Starting point is 01:03:14 And behind her, and conservative commentator, Jack Basobic, who posted a tweet with 8646 during Joe Biden's presidency. So it's selective outrage, apparently. And then even more so against somebody who seems you don't actually want to hold accountable. Prosecutors will likely face a high level, a high legal bar to prove that the Instagram post constituted a true threat. That's what it looks like when it's designed. to fail, ladies and gentlemen.

Starting point is 01:03:40 And this is my point, you know. An arrest warrant has been issued. Not just a summons. It's all coming down. Right. The usual thing. Beard vet says, this is what I voted for. Yeah, I'd love it if those people went to jail.

Starting point is 01:03:53 I don't know why you guys still seem to think that it's actually happening, though. That's why I can't get passed. We agree. They should go to prison. Just not happening, though. I mean, look at the people on this list, guys. Do you realize how many, half these people aren't even in the government right now. They can be arrested right now.

Starting point is 01:04:08 for things that I can prove they're guilty for. But guess what? It'll end up drawing back to the same people in this administration. But as this person says, amazing how you get rid of Bondi and stuff actually starts happening. Is that what's happening? These are the same things that happen with Bondi. You guys just jump at everything.

Starting point is 01:04:26 I know it's opium, guys. I know you want it. I do too. I want accountability. I just don't think you got to be more, you know, less naive, I guess. Here's what, this I think actually relates to the shooting, but either way, the point is what he's saying in the context of all of it. I just am blown away.

Starting point is 01:04:44 I mean, this guy in particular is just such a shameless whatever Trump tells me to do guy, in my opinion. Just a snide disregard. You know, like when people are asking about the Epstein list and he's just, his face was just like, you know, what list? What do you mean? Like the obvious list that we all know about, bud, that one, the one you're lying to us about.

Starting point is 01:05:00 The point is this guy, these people's jobs are to make you feel dumb for asking basically obvious questions. But this is what Burke Sterling says. The man is a criminal in violation of U.S. law, verifiably so, in regard to Epstein, but also other things. But he has the nerve to lecture us about opinions? Yes. People in this room, if we're going to be honest about it, have done it as done as well. They're just as guilty as a lot of people on X.

Starting point is 01:05:26 When you have reporters, when you have media, media. As a lot of people on Twitter. Right. So you, right now, you say Trump's bad? Oh, you're, you're guilty. I mean, who knows whether that's what he's talking about. Obviously, is probably more serious. The point is it's still speech. All they're doing is broadening that window. You're right now, like everybody on Twitter is a reason he said that, guys. I thought it was the Democrats who wanted

Starting point is 01:05:51 censor speech. Look, just because you found a category of speech that you don't like, and so therefore you want to get rid of it doesn't mean it's any different than what the left was doing. In fact, it's literally the same thing. You just have a different category. You're just as hypocritical because, you know, it's like any person, it's a very human thing, to be honest. You know, you make the rationalizations when it affects your life. But if you're an honest person, you can stand back and recognize that it's the same thing you're criticizing over there. Just being overly critical and calling the president horrible names for no reason and without evidence without proof. Okay, first of all, there's tons of evidence and tons of reasons, but it doesn't

Starting point is 01:06:30 matter. That's the point, guys. That's what free speech means. This is basic. This is like Bondi coming out and saying, hate speech, it's not free speech when pointing to Charlie Kirk. Like, that should have been enough for everybody. One, that's not what Charlie Kirk thought. Two, that's exactly the opposite of what you were fighting for. Or, you know, and I always do this, this is my point.

Starting point is 01:06:51 I'm of the mind that everyone sees it because of obvious reasons. But along with 75 other points, Stargate on day one, every Maha failure, every single step of every single agenda along the way. And somebody, every one of those steps is going, okay, too much. Okay, that was the, oh, the Iran war, okay, you guys are lying. All you get are the Gunther Eaglemans and Cat Turds out there going, we're winning. Crazy. It shouldn't surprise us that this type of rhetoric takes place. If you look at what, at what it appears that this defendant had in his past, we're talking about somebody who was college educated, who has a job, who is otherwise living his life and and we'll find out more about him as i expect in the coming days and weeks yeah that

Starting point is 01:07:37 sounds like yeah we're going to be dripping this out slowly so get ready it's coming we're going to try to control your narrative right right but but he chose to do what he did and so our threat environment is we are we are ready i mean i'm not going to go through what yeah so like always that right then you just we all you just said recently but we all know it's the most secure he who knows if it's the reality but one of the most secure places on the planet right so now it's different why wouldn't you be like that before like it just doesn't change this is just trying to keep the feeling going that we're in a special circumstance what the what director patelle just talked about with the way we responded but this this was something that we will always be prepared for and and it's sad that it has to happen

Starting point is 01:08:15 but it's it's not a new thing unfortunately yeah right so basically is nothing has changed except it has because what you're doing is using these things to take further steps into you know encroaching on our rights but all you just did is going the things that have always been happening. And so more rights need to be removed. Always. In fact, I think, let me see, I had, I mean, I'm going to try to grab this real quick in case I didn't pull it with me. Yeah, I left it here to grab this real quick. Because this is the same thing. Guys, it's very relevant to see where are these people who are always standing up with their righteous indignation about how the left is trying to take everything from you. Shoot, hold on. There we go. And so these

Starting point is 01:09:07 kind of things happen, right? And this is the kind of stuff you get. Matt Walsh. No president has ever been targeted for an assassination three times. Frankly, I find that to be, that's, first of all, Trump wasn't either, if we're not going to be stupid about this, but he says the level of political violence from the left is historic. No, not really. And by the way, the left and right are exactly the same thing. If you're not a child, Matt Walsh, we've never seen anything like it in the entire history of the nation. Not true. It's a five alarm fire. National emergency, drastic measures must be taking. My God, can we not just recognize that you, Matt, you are the left. You are exactly the pink-haired trans-pushing lunatic that you fought in a different

Starting point is 01:09:51 color, doing the same stupid things pushing the same stupid problems for a different reason. And just tired of acting like these people or anything other than exactly what they're called, it's right in front of you. D drastic measures must be taken. What could that possibly mean if we're talking about speech. I'm sure you could figure that out. Crazy. And again, we talked about this the first time. The illusion of it.

Starting point is 01:10:23 And we were correct as it failed. Now, here's an interesting clip of Alex Jones. Justin died of James Comey for his 86 post. Now, weirdly, just basically, I'm convinced this person's watching our content, but ultimately comes on and goes, that's just designed to fail, exactly like we're talking about.

Starting point is 01:10:38 The opposite of what he said last time. But then guess what? when you get down into the gritty of the video, he actually kind of goes the other direction. Not a surprise. And he goes, well, maybe it's a secret. Maybe it will work out. And hey, he's not wrong.

Starting point is 01:10:50 Maybe it will. My point, though, is that's what his real message is. You get you, you start off by going, like I always point out, he may be the worst thing in the world, but then the rest of the video is basically selling you on why you should stand by him. This guy's a, it's just,

Starting point is 01:11:02 these people are ridiculous. They deserve criticism. This person says, is this administration stupid? We don't want people arrested for engaging in their constitutional right to freedom of speech. we want the, as he writes, pedophiles that run the world to be arrested for their pedophilia. We want the deep state arrested for fabricating long and federal election results. We want politicians arrested for laundering tax money and representing special interests better than their constituents.

Starting point is 01:11:24 Yes, you see, this is what I'm talking about. This is what a vagab person or whatever you want to call somebody who believe what Trump promised, still wanting those things because he's not a liar and dishonest or whatever in this context. Because I don't know who he is. The point is clearly that that's not what's happening. Now, if you watch this again, you'll see an interesting moment where it's sort of like the, well, we'll, but I want to point out as well as we'll make this point clear in a second. Five minutes and 30 seconds, this is where the video goes.

Starting point is 01:11:52 It's nine minutes and 30 seconds long. After five minutes and 30 seconds, the entire thing is advertisements. Here, buy this truck, buy this coin, buy this methylene blue and shirts and blah, blah, blah. It's just crazy. Yep, you know what I mean. But Kyle Becker, another point comes out and says, the floodgates are opening. Senator Chuck Grassley has released a letter to the DOJ, which he has. An FBI, along with internal FBI records related to the Clinton Foundation and the uranium one deal.

Starting point is 01:12:23 And here's what it shows. Yes, guys, they should be arrested for this. There's tons of stuff that we cover back in the day. Here's a letter. Grassley sent this on 27th. That is two days ago. Who knows? Maybe something will actually happen.

Starting point is 01:12:37 But if you're of the mind that it would be, it would need a politician just to go, hey, DOJ and FBI, can you do something about the things that are in your possession? And they go, oh, I guess I will. And somehow that makes sense. Come on, guys. If there was going to be something, it wouldn't take Chuck Grassley going, hey, do something for them to do something, especially with locker up Hillary Clinton. Oh, excuse me, with their good people, leave Malone, Hillary Clinton.

Starting point is 01:13:04 It's what he said after he got elected, you know, the reality. But I've just, it never stops. And I hope so, guys, the same point the whole time. All this stuff and yep, and I know and yep, and all the stuff and they're criminals and we agree, but they won't go to jail because it just inevitably seems to be the reality of where we are. And I want them to, and we should fight for that, but recognize that it's not one side if you're actually paying attention. And like I said, and this is what you get on the 27. Holy crap, red light, rashly resurrects the old document.

Starting point is 01:13:36 Q was right. It's absolutely mind-blowing. Oh, my God. Why? Because he just repeated what we already knew happened that proves anything. It's crazy to me. Every single day. Arrest somebody, right? But so here we are where it hasn't. Last, I already checked right up until the very moment. The DOJ or the FBI, haven't done a single thing, haven't said a single thing about this. Maybe we'll see something tomorrow. I certainly hope so. But you get the point. So getting into what Trump is actually saying right now and some of these examples of very like just, just flagrant violations of everything that you guys were promised. White House on the 27th came out and said enough was enough. And of course, it's all in the heels of this, you know, whatever. The left is crazy. So we have to respect your speech and take your guns and whatever else they're talking about. I do not think that hate speech, think that the hate speech, Trump says, of the Democrats, is very dangerous.

Starting point is 01:14:25 I do think he says that the hate speech of the Democrats is very dangerous. No, Trump, it's just speech. Speech is speech. Hate speech, love speech, speech, speech. Free speech is all speech. I really think it's dangerous for the country. Yeah, I mean, is anybody confused? It's the same tactic.

Starting point is 01:14:41 We're going to have to suppress their speech, which will be whoever they want to, meaning me, even though I'm not a Democrat, it'll be applied the same way, and then the Republicans will go, oh, he's a Democrat, you know, until it becomes them and then it's something, you know,

Starting point is 01:14:53 it's the never-ending cycle of stupidity. He's censoring you. And if you care about free speech, then that should be a problem for you. I just simply said, so, hey, speech is a thing. Words are violence? Isn't that what Republicans called out in the left? it was. Isn't that a free speech issue? Yes, it is. Let's see how many hypocrites expose themselves yet again

Starting point is 01:15:11 to support Trump. This isn't new. There's a good time to make this point. Here's another one. Secretary Doug Bergman comes out and says the United States government has found, and it's USGS, which is the, I think the science arm of the USG, the US government has found the Appalachian region. So great, Kentucky, Texas, Tennessee, it's all coming your way of the U.S. contains, at least they claim, by the way, this could just be a justification to remove people for data center for all we know. But they say enough lithium in this, in the Appalachian area, to replace 328 years of the imports from other countries

Starting point is 01:15:52 that they need to occupy and destabilize and threaten to get what they want. Thanks to the world leading mineral science, it says permitting reform and renewed investment in domestic mining, the United States, in this case, Donald Trump, has reclaimed America's mineral, independence. I hate how they keep doing this. It's the same lie they keep spinning with being oil, you know, dominant. Like, look, the reality is there is oil. But at the moment, they're not producing more oil than the rest of them combined. That's a fair. I think Chris

Starting point is 01:16:18 Martin's just a great breakdown showing you they're lying about that. But it doesn't mean it's not possible. It's just, it's always some kind of bluster with these guys, some kind of, you know, dishonesty. And in this case, pointing out that it's there in no way is reclaiming your middle independence. They would take a ton of effort funding and infrastructure to get to a point to where you could begin to mine in these locations that don't have that as far as I know. But my concern is that how is this what we support right now from people who are nonpartisan, let alone those who fought against this because you thought it was some kind of, you know, woke energy shift and, you know, to electric vehicles and, you know, whatever else, battery.

Starting point is 01:17:00 There was a huge push. And I agree with a lot of reasons. why to stop this weird transition, especially since, and I do have one, a good interview about this with Dane Wigington. I think this is the one. If not, it's down below. It was a follow-up we had, and we get into, yeah, this one, geoengineering and climate change, gambling with the human species. And what he's really talking about is this kind of manipulation of all this stuff.

Starting point is 01:17:23 It's a good conversation. And that these energies are not actually, if ever, you know, like I argue this could eventually be feasible, but at the moment are not. And they just rushed it. It was, I think, designed to fail. and there's a lot of reasons for that. Just coincidentally, what we're talking about right now. But here, my point in all of this is that, you know,

Starting point is 01:17:40 the pushback was from the right about this change. And now suddenly it's coming from the right to push this and challenge to the fossil fuels that you were defending with the left attack you. Like, it just kind of we not recognize. I know most of you do. But for those that are still waffling about this, that there's any difference here.

Starting point is 01:17:57 Like, they will literally convert, can change you. Like, your entire stance will become the opposite of what it was a year ago because your team suddenly thinks that. It's just wild. And my big point is, this is not a partisan issue, even though the usual suspects are already trying to make that the case. But this, and I'll show you the larger one, actually, is what this kind of mining does to the surrounding area.

Starting point is 01:18:18 It utterly destroys it. It chemically manipulates. It becomes to where, like, not just because of the mining, but because of the processes and the chemicals, it's destructive. Appalachia is a hugely important area for this country, and it is beautiful, and it's not what we want. I don't care what it brings. And it says, I wrote funny how the sides subswitched.

Starting point is 01:18:38 But here, just a couple more of these images to understand what we're talking about. It's like just completely destructive and ruins. The landscape ruins the area. And it's just not natural. I mean, look at these things. And all this is for is their AI direction. That's what it's really about. So for me, to me, that just doesn't make any sense.

Starting point is 01:19:02 And Tom Fitton says, expect the left to try and stop the mining of these natural resources. I just don't understand that. I've come to Tom Fitness, somebody who's, you know, it's partisan, but I've kind of seen as somebody who at least, you know, I'm not saying this one point makes this the opposite. But I'm just kind of, I was surprised by that because I find me pretty logical. And he, you know, even though partisan, I feel like it's more kind of just a, you know, I feel like more so it's, anyway, the point is, I'm surprised by that.

Starting point is 01:19:26 And he says, expect the left to try to stop the mining. And this person responds by saying it won't be only the left trying to stop this BS. And this says, you got that right. I just think it's weird people trying to make these partisan when it's so obviously not about partisanship. You can support this or not and has nothing to do with what side you're on. It's about whether you desire or covet what it will gain you over the destruction. It'll bring to the natural and the resources or rather the environment. And caring about whether your landscape is destroyed is not about being woke.

Starting point is 01:19:54 But that's the game. And some people will have bought into that. Zane Honeycutt points out a very important one in regard to the farm bill. And we talked about this briefly, but there's just one post will break out, break down why this is so shockingly counter to what you were promised and what this administration says they're doing. On the farm bill, no, she says in the farm bill, unless all of these are removed. Specifically, part one.

Starting point is 01:20:20 Subtitle C of Title X entitled Regulatory Reform contains the following provisions that threaten farmer children's human health, soil quality, and water safety. Section 102.1 permanently excludes, excludes dozens of hazardous chemicals used in industrial agriculture from human health and environmental safety reviews that are currently required under the federal insecticide, fungicide, and ronicide act. That exact act, we've covered all of these, all of the terrible things they spray and they already use, by the way, and all of the different endocrine disrupting chemicals. And what they're doing is we're permanently excluding dozens of dangerous ones, way more dangerous

Starting point is 01:20:59 than the ones that we already use, which are wildly dangerous, from having any safety reviews. I mean, you want to have a good time trying to make sense of how that even remotely comes within a hundred miles of what you said Maha was going to do. There's no way that would be acceptable for anybody who even pretended to be in that group. Section 102 weakens and delays efforts to protect children, farm workers, and public health from dangerous pesticides by giving unprecedented authority to the USDA's Office of Pest Management. You know, the USDA just got basically taken to our Pallantier. Good job. To review and potentially veto any environmental or. human health safeguards determined to be necessary by the EPA.

Starting point is 01:21:36 Now, I'm being slightly hyperbolic about being taken over, but I'll get to the Pallantier point about this. It's in every facet of this country right now. Section 102.03 delays protections for endangered species against dangerous pesticides by giving an internal interagency work group a de facto veto on any efforts to protecting endangered species for pesticides, which could delay or weak and critical conversation. Conservation matters.

Starting point is 01:22:01 Excuse me, measures. I can't read right now. I thought the whole time, which is why. But, you know, this is where you get so frustrating, these weird categories that have just been like declared woke or whatever that even means anymore, seeing as out the right is objectively as ridiculously woke as the left, if you really understand what it means.

Starting point is 01:22:19 And yet was the idea that somehow caring that this would remove species from the planet forever or that, but by caring about that at all, like, you know, basically given the veto over any concern about that. You may not care, about that, but the idea that it's about, like, you have to understand what that means for the preservation of the planet and its ecosystem, but no, that's woke, I guess. But it says, 1204 delays the review of hundreds of pesticides, including glyphosate due this year. Of course,

Starting point is 01:22:47 because they love glyphosate. They made it a national security imperative for harms to human health. Endangered wildlife and endocrine disruption until 2031. They put off the endocrine a disrupting chemical problem until 2031, you know, right after their control grid is put into place. What do you want? What do you know? Leaving potentially dangerous pesticides on the market and in widespread use without any updated protective measures.

Starting point is 01:23:11 Guys, they lied to you. How in the world can anybody pretend like this is what they promise? This is the opposite. This is business as usual. R.K. Jr., Donald Trump. Same thing. Or rather, in the case of before, I meant. 205 effectively gives immunity to pesticides.

Starting point is 01:23:29 companies from their duty to warn the public about dangerous chemicals and their pesticide formulations, potentially eliminating access to the federal courts for thousands of individuals with cancer, Parkinson's disease, and other health issues scientifically linked to pesticide exposure. 206 erases state and local safety restrictions. Erases them. The whole state, this is just a national thing at this point. They've multiple times, this Trump administration has shown how little they care about the constitutional reality of state's rights. Because he's in charge, right? That's how he views it.

Starting point is 01:24:03 Eliminates the six-decade-old authority of state and local governments to implement additional local and state-focused restrictions on the use of dangerous pesticides to protect children, farm workers, pollinators, public health, and the environment. 207 allows more toxins in your water. Yep.

Starting point is 01:24:20 Erases important, long-standing safeguards to protect people and wildlife from pesticide pollution, discharged directly into the water, ways through the Clean Water Act, pesticide general permit, through the broad language and though the broad language, excuse me, would exempt pesticide approvals from the Endangered Species Act, Clean Air Act, and other bedrock. They're literally enshrining in this. They're, the very things they told you they were fighting for. Section 102.11 increases farmer data

Starting point is 01:24:47 collection and tracks behavior through Palantir. I mean, did you really not see that coming? The insanity of how that could have even connected. It's all very, very, very obviously interconnected in such an alarming way. This is not some kind of hyperbolic concern at this point, guys. It's literally happening. Everything we're talking about. I'm not trying to scare anybody. You could see it.

Starting point is 01:25:09 I mean, it's time to get scared, not to get irrational, but to act. Not talking about violence. I'm just talking about making sure we raise awareness about this and then do what you think can make a difference. You can decide what that means. I'm never calling for violence. Is this really a good for a good for farmer farm bill or is it good for the deep state? Right.

Starting point is 01:25:27 Exactly. The very deep state that Trump is fighting, apparently, according to even Alice Jones recently? Crazy. I'm going to reach out for an interview on this. See if she gets back. I'm sure she will. I did a panel with her for a Ph.D. event a while back where I was hosting the panel and she was one of the interviewees.

Starting point is 01:25:53 She's very, very good at what she does. Okay. GM watch. Supreme Court to hear Roundup case on Monday. Bayer is arguing that EPA approval precludes further regulation and labor. Critics argue the EPA's review process is deficient and routinely fails to require cancer warnings and federal court seems to agree. Well, we already just highlighted an example over here where they're making sure glyphosate will not be engaged with as a whether endocrine-discriminer-disrupting chemical

Starting point is 01:26:25 or just as the dangerous cancer-causing thing that it is. On top of that, you've got some roundup, or rather Bayer and Monsanto in Supreme Court, already showing the court's eagerness to give them the allowance to do, you know, to manipulate, right, labeling. And it's just so, We're sprinting in the wrong direction. Sprinting. Too much. I'll include some of these discussions where we talked about the FDA walks back. The food die ban, which you already know about.

Starting point is 01:26:56 Trump beginning his new WHO plan, which should show you what's really going on. We'll talk about the glyphosate ruling that. Trump ignores MAHA by ruling glyphosate national security imperative despite obvious health risks. We talk about MAHA bait and switch. Trump's EPA calls for review of fluoride science while ignoring historic ruling on fluoride. Can't miss this stuff, guys. It's pretty obvious. Now, let's talk about the National Science Foundation. Now, there's plenty of discussion. Points have made, criticisms about, you know, any government body, frankly, and what these things might have done. But historically, largely, this is sort of an appointee,

Starting point is 01:27:30 it is an appointed body largely bipartisan. And it's been that way for a long time. And since 2016 forward, and it's not just Trump, I think it's just a larger government employee, but we've seen this massive shift into, you know, we're not all Americans and we've got different opinions. We've, it's gone to you're the enemy. And more so now than I've ever seen from the unity party. Funny how that works. And it's not just Trump, if you keep thinking that.

Starting point is 01:27:56 It's about just, I think this is the evolution of this government agenda. That's all one thing. But the ultimate point being that, you know, it's just, I think, oh, well, I lost my train of thought there. Hold on. That's what it was. The bipartisan. The point I was making, I think I lost part of it.

Starting point is 01:28:16 But ultimately, you know, this body was bipartisan and, you know, that to, that, well, I'm going to leave it there. Damn, but there's something I was going to say there that was actually important. I'm sure it'll jump back in my head in an hour and a half. I'll have to run back over here. But anyway, back to the point is that so the, Donald Trump has effectively removed everybody from this body. Now, I'm one, like any of you, I have concerns about how these things can be used. I mean, anything government connected or how we can, you know, this kind of thing can somewhat, like, for example, during COVID-19 can be used to justify things. scientifically that we disagree with, especially if it's a right partisan kind of, well,

Starting point is 01:28:50 oh, that's kind of what I was saying is that post the 2016 forward, it was all about the, you know, suddenly you're the enemy. And so in this conversation before, you might have argued that there was more, you know, collaboration, whereas today people have just been trained to see the other side as the enemy, no matter what. So that, I think, plays a factor here, but it's also about internally. But so you'll see what I mean to go through this. This is April 25th. Now, the reason I find this relevant is just because of where it's all going. I mean, look, things they're doing, whether it's pathogen-related or technologically related, there's health overlaps and science overlaps that are very relevant right now,

Starting point is 01:29:27 that you could argue this body might point out if it was done honestly. And right now, there are people within this that it's some points adversarial with Trump's agenda, which I would argue is a good thing if it comes. I mean, that's how the government check and balance system is supposed to work. Hopefully one day we can get beyond government entirely. But while we're here, this seems to be something that actually had some effect, and they're trying to get away from that entirely. U.S. Donald Trump, President Donald Trump, yesterday fired.

Starting point is 01:29:56 This was 25th, fired all or rather 24th, all 22 members of the National Science Board, the body that oversees the National Science Foundation. Many science advocates see it as the latest step in his administration, in his administration to a road, some would say destroy, the independence of the 76-year-old research agency. Maybe you think it should be destroyed. The NSB is a unique entity within the U.S. government in addition to advising the administration and Congress on national science policy. It has statutory authority to oversee the actions of the $9 billion foundation, setting policy and approving large expenditures. So right there alone, if you get rid of all the people,

Starting point is 01:30:35 that's a $9 billion expenditure that suddenly falls to the White House. At least I would argue that's what they would see it as. It's presidentially appointed members, typically prominent academics and industrial leaders, serve six-year terms with eight members chosen every two years. The 24-member board has two vacancies when the termination notices were sent out. That's what I was saying earlier is that there were two that already weren't, and then the rest of them were fired.

Starting point is 01:31:02 Now, Kevin or Kivon, Strausson, one of the dismissed board members says the mass firing of the latest is the latest indication of the White House is ignoring the board's authority and dictating policies at the NSF, which has been without a permanent director since the former director resigned a year ago. So another example of somebody resigned in frustration because he was angry with what the Trump administration was doing, which it'll get to essentially just ignoring them. And, you know, the people that were appointed were no longer even in charge of their own department, which you could argue is, I mean, illegal, if not.

Starting point is 01:31:38 I mean, it won't be their word for that. I would argue probably illegal. At the end of the day, there is, at the very least, that there's a policy violation of some kind. The point being is that these people are put in the position, they're the ones managing the department, and it is presentially appointed. So I guess you could argue, I'm not arguing this is a crime necessarily,

Starting point is 01:31:55 but what I'm getting at is that this is in the pursuit of something much more manipulative, whether that's the money being used for something they're working on or just this sort of repopulation of all people that are just like, yes, Trump, whatever you want, and amounts to the same thing. I argue there's a lot going on where a body like this, if accurate or honest, which is we should always question, would be something important to question whether their new thing is dangerous for you, to question whether, you know, not that's ever worked that way, but maybe they are worried that that might be the case, just because they are adversarial to Trump.

Starting point is 01:32:28 And it says the White House's decision last month asked Congress to give the foundation 900 million, million dollars next year, right? So interestingly, you push these people out of the way and the White House made the decision last month before you did this to ask for $900 million for specifically for a new Arctic research icebreaker is another example of how the Trump administration's office and management of and budget has prevented the board from meeting its obligations, says Strausson, who until yesterday shared the groups, committee in large research facilities. But, you know, so give us another billion dollars for this new Arctic research thing,

Starting point is 01:33:10 which who knows what that is? Some kind of AI data is anything. Like, I just get the sense that they're struggling in a lot of ways where they're financially because there's just kind of stretched thin. And this just might be another way to find a billion dollars for some kind of part. I don't know. But this feels wrong in every possible way to me. And it says the Office of Management and Budget basically said very directly to the National

Starting point is 01:33:35 Science Foundation's chief of research facilities that, quote, you will build a new research vessel. And there was no involvement by the board, the board who's supposed to be the ones deciding how to allot those funds, which is required to approve and authorize. Now, when you see required, I argue there's a legality there, right? And they just ignored that entirely, which shouldn't surprise you for this administration. Any major infrastructure investments are supposed to be approved and authorized by the board. And when the board asked, the response was, well, Office of Management budget was very clear in his directive. You don't, you're, you get, you're not in charge anymore. Now, Lofgren worries Trump will, quote, fill the board with MAGA loyalists, which I argue that

Starting point is 01:34:14 doesn't mean MAGA. Maga are people who genuinely want to make America great again. Not, and that's why they believe what Trump was promising. What Trump's doing is not what he promised. So therefore, those still supporting him are not MAGA. They're the fake Patriots, the fake MAGA. And again, that's whether or not you disagree with what MAGA actually wanted. They're not getting what they were promised. Like, you got to see that right now. And it says, they filled it with loyalists to Trump and who won't stand up to him, which in and of itself seems like exactly what he's doing everywhere else. But Strausson believes it doesn't matter whether Trump obstructs the board or leaves its positions unfilled, which is important, right? Because

Starting point is 01:34:47 if he leaves it unfilled, he just does what he wants anyway, acts like it's just a long-term process and uses that money in the meantime. And essentially can use the power and resources of this body to justify or support his agendas. It says, we would ask them, are you following board governance directives, Strausson says, and their answer would be in effect, we don't listen to you anymore. So in and of itself,

Starting point is 01:35:11 it's a small version of the same thing happening everywhere else. It's a coup. You're watching this power transition take place. I just don't know how I can get any more clear.

Starting point is 01:35:19 This is a microcosm of the larger problem that's happening. Now, this is from NPR. Scientists see Trump's firing off of the national science board as an attack on research. Informing each of his 22-seeded members

Starting point is 01:35:32 in the terse email on Friday, you've been terminated, effective immediately. Like, apparently it was like two sentences, a few sentences, a very quick thing, you're fired, move on. Like, you know, it just feels weird. The National Science Board was established by Congress in 1950 and signed a law by President Truman. It's a major funder of basic science, math, engineering, research,

Starting point is 01:35:52 especially at colleges, universities across the United States. So, right there, you could argue, oh, that's bad because science or whatever, that's my point from before, an overreaction. It can be, yeah, people can abuse anything. And we should be skeptical of anything connected to these kind of power structures. But if Trump's pulling all this away, what happens to the funding of basic science, math, engineering research at colleges, universities, you know, things that were actually, I would argue in some cases, if done honestly and correctly, we're educating people. We're, you know, gay, I mean, just think about these things in effect.

Starting point is 01:36:25 I mean, what if this is a Republican college if you think that matters more? members are appointed by the president to staggered six-year terms and do not require Senate confirmation. Here's where their argument comes from. The board, made up primarily of academics and industry leaders, is charged with identifying issues critical to their future submitted by the NFS budget and approving its programs and awards. It says in a written statement to the NPR, to the platform by email, the White House said the firing of the board was in line with a 2021 Supreme Court case.

Starting point is 01:36:58 U.S. versus Arth, arthrics, that quote, raised constitutional questions. You've got to love that. About whether non-Senate-confirmed appointees can exercise authority that Congress gave the National Science Board. Are you serious? This is so crazy to me. So what you're saying is Congress gave the authority to the board. You appoint people to the board, and you're saying, but wait a minute, they're not Senate confirmed. they can't operate the authority appointed to them by the president.

Starting point is 01:37:30 What? Guys, that's a ridiculous argument because the truth is the board is embodied by the people you appoint. Like I'm about to get into, tons of other people who are wielding so much power in this administration, it's alarming. But surely they don't, you know, they care about, no, they only care about this because this is their flimsy justification from incompetent people to justify why they did what they did for other reasons. It's not this. First of all, constitutional issues. while you're violating that in every single thing you're doing, I shouldn't be hyperbolic in a lot of very clear ways.

Starting point is 01:38:04 I just think that's so ridiculous. Again, just to not miss the point that you're talking about a board that's been given authority by Congress who then it's just a board. There's nobody that can manage that authority unless you see it Trump as something you'd like to wield and then you appoint people. But then turning around and going, but wait, it's an issue because they weren't Senate confirmed. They can't operate that authority.

Starting point is 01:38:23 Okay, well, let's talk about that. I wrote these, oops. Oh, man. I hope I didn't just lose that. Damn it, hold on. I don't remember most of them. Let me see if you, shoot. Okay, well, off top of my head.

Starting point is 01:38:38 The point was a list of people that I just looked into that I'm to make sure, and most of these people we already know, there's some of that I just wanted to double check. People who are appointed, not Senate confirmed, not elected, right? Susie Wiles. Just talked about her. White Al's chief of staff, one of the most powerful roles in any administration. and she was, same point.

Starting point is 01:39:00 Not Senate confirmed, appointed. So you'd think that that would matter, right? You have huge power and influence. Well, what about that, Trump? Aren't you concern that she has influence over all these things that's not appointed? Of course, it doesn't matter now, right? Tom Holman, Stephen Miller. Stephen Miller, of all people.

Starting point is 01:39:16 Stephen Miller is one of the most alarming people in this entire conversation, who is basically more power than Rubio and the rest and is an appointed person, not Senate confirmed. I mean, there is an endless amount of people. David Sachs, AIs are, who technically is not that anymore, Elon Musk and people tied to him. The point is there's a list 20 people who are not appointed, or who are appointed, who are not Senate confirmed.

Starting point is 01:39:42 So by logic, it would be the same thing. Wouldn't we care about that? When you get the point, guys, it's not actually about what they say it's about. Surprise, surprise. Now, to get into the AI overlap to this. Because, you know, all of these, by the way, we're still on the conversation of the things that we're being lied to about, things that are going in the wrong direction, right?

Starting point is 01:40:04 But as we're talking about the idea of wielding too much power, I guess, let's talk about Elon Musk and the AI infrastructure they're building. So more perfect union, Elon Musk and the Trump administration are suing to block Colorado's first in the nation AI anti-discrimination law. you know like they said that we were going to stop the states from being able to create their own regulate they did they you know even though that's the unconscionate the point is obviously letnik and the rest have made it clear that we're doing this and you guys can't do anything about it now what they're saying is we're going to sue the state by the way from

Starting point is 01:40:45 the trump administration because he is still part of it regardless the court ruled that but trump's involved anyway for them passing the law which is their right to pass that's legally the constitutional right of the states. But more than that, it's specifically about a law that stops what we all see coming. Now, you could argue discrimination. That's a woke left thing.

Starting point is 01:41:05 Look at this. You could argue that what Twitter is doing right now is discriminating against Palestinian supporters against people who are calling out Zionism. It doesn't have to just be about racial things. It's about using certain dynamics to exclude certain people. And in this case, what they're talking about is, well, AI, I mean, who's just, I can't speak to exactly the

Starting point is 01:41:23 way they saw it being discriminated against, but AI is already showing to have tons of these things and or being used. And either way, they have the right to do that. The DOJ has joined a suit filed by Musk's XAI, a company, which by the way is a military contractor, so it literally is part of the government, but it is a company and the Trump administration steps in to sue with them. That law aims to regulate high risk AI systems and protect consumers from algorithmic discrimination. I mean, to me, regardless of your sensitively, your weird

Starting point is 01:41:56 partisan sensitivities that are unjustified, discrimination in many cases does happen and does matter. In this case, it will be something when we end up in this technocratic feudal dystopia where then it's everybody versus those in control. Of course, you may not think that's what's happening. Either way, this is the opposite

Starting point is 01:42:13 of what you would fight for, I would argue. The idea that the reality of states rights is the Constitution. But let's get into the AI Palantir, all of this. This gets pretty damn terrifying. I mean, you already probably have seen, we've talked about all of this. We've talked about all this extensively for quite a long time.

Starting point is 01:42:37 This is a new article from Wired, and this has to do with the digital ID, and a Doge and a government, what would you call it? It's a platform kind of a thing, but it's a government kind of, you know, my institution, what am I looking for? I'll read from here at login.gov.

Starting point is 01:42:55 So I guess it's a government and, T. Greg Hogan, who by the, we'll get to in a second, was funded in a previous company by Andreessen, Mark Andreessen. Got directly back into the network state agenda, Peter Thiel, all of it, guys. There's a very clear influence network right here. Greg Hogan will oversee login.gov as the government seeks to integrate driver's license and passport information into the service. Told you. That's exactly what I promised what happened. Did I not? That eventually, that the, the, the license elements, the things they have on the real, the Save America Act as the alternatives to the digital things they want to force on you are the things that they're already trying to

Starting point is 01:43:37 move in only digital diversions. So you can use your passport, but it's the digital versions that we're giving you. So you have a digital ID. It's obvious the way this was going. The Save Act was one side of it. Then you have, of course, the Biden mobile driver's license. And I've been talking about this for years. And now, as we can see, making what one insider calls a national ID. Thanks Trump administration for doing what we have all been fighting against the previous administration. This person says, what happened to small government for the right? Oh, yeah, MAGA destroyed the GOP.

Starting point is 01:44:09 Well, again, I argue that was the fake MAGA who tricked people who genuinely wanted those things. Here's the article. This was yesterday. A Doge affiliate is now in charge of the U.S. government's ID platform. Well, that's always kind of been the reality here because digital services was the same thing. It is Doge became digital services became Doge. It has always been this. I've said that from the very beginning.

Starting point is 01:44:31 It's been about digital ID. Funny how that's been yet again, showing to be the reality. And do we just pretend that Doge just didn't happen? One of the endless, one of the promises that failed that we forget to bring up often, lower smaller government, all the fraud, all the criminality.

Starting point is 01:44:47 Guys, they're spending more, government's bigger, the wars are happening. They lied to you and must just drift into the background. They literally profiteers. stole and absorbed everything they possibly could for their AI and just ran. Greg Hogan, an affiliate of the so-called Department of Government Efficiency, will serve as acting assistant commissioner of the technology transformation services.

Starting point is 01:45:10 A unit within the General Services Administration, one of the very first government entities that was basically trialing these AI government elements and the lack of siloed information. There, and Palantir, of course, and this not a joke, by the way, it's all of government at this point. There, he will oversee login.gov, the government secure login and identity service. So the technology transformation services.

Starting point is 01:45:37 Well, serve as the acting commissioner, what you're going to find, by the way, is all these weird doge people have all filtered back in their own, in multiple places all throughout the government. Hogan will be focused on growing login.gov's user base with the ultimate goal of the product becoming, quote,

Starting point is 01:45:54 platform recognized beyond the federal government. Oh, beyond the federal government. Great. So like a global ID kind of thing? Why would a U.S. government login.gov website database be used beyond the federal government. Now, I guess you could argue that it just meant all of the country beyond government. Well, that's the same problem, though, isn't it? An all-encompassing ID that's used everywhere?

Starting point is 01:46:19 Yeah, that's exactly what we're fighting. Hogan came to the government in January, 2020. from a startup called comma.a.ai, which works on self-automation technology for cars, which, by the way, got its funding predominantly from Andresen Herowitz. Now, that matters to me. Whether this person's aware of that influence in my mind or not, the point is that that same network is influenced and touched and funded.

Starting point is 01:46:45 Every element of this we're talking about. And Trump's administration is just, I mean, it is one big web, guys. as I mean in fact Oh shoot Damn it I hope it comes back Nope That was stupid

Starting point is 01:47:01 Well I'm gonna read through it a second Anyway but I'm gonna grab this Which I should have grabbed before we started the show Always mad for that Damn okay It's not that long But this was a great article series

Starting point is 01:47:16 In fact from Eric Bros Entitled Meet the Peter Thiel acolytes in Donald Trump's second administration. Look at that. February 2025, it's almost like we were screaming about all of these things back when we might have been able to do something about it. Funny how that works. And then here is the follow-up. Meet the man whose philosophy has influenced Peter Thiel and the technocrats. That man is Curtis Jarbitt. And if you've been paying attention, if you watch my interview with Ian David, I mean, this is interwoven guys. This is all of them. I mean,

Starting point is 01:47:47 it's not even a secret. They're telling you. They're literally telling you, we are going to change this stuff for your benefit, whether you think it or not. You know, you'll, you'll own nothing and you'll be happy is quite literally what it makes. In a digital, you own the keys kind of way, like Coinbase. That's exactly what this is. And as Ian said in the interview, in these Prospera, technocratic, you know, these network state discussions, that's what they say, that all things will be, all value will be digitized.

Starting point is 01:48:11 Here we are. So going back to this, see where we were. I don't think it was that long. Yeah, good. Okay. So where was I? I was going to read through it because I think there's some points I don't want to miss in this. Hogan came to the government in January 25 from comma.

Starting point is 01:48:25 coma.I works on self-automation. He served as CIO. Yeah, for Doge's operatives in the government. This is while there, he signed off on the privacy impact assessment that allowed for the creation of an email server that was the focus of a whole bunch of lawsuits. And this is, you know, we'll go over, but I think in the next article as well. Or maybe not.

Starting point is 01:48:55 I'm surprised I didn't take a picture of that one. I guess it wasn't that long. Oh, no, that is that right there. Oh, good. Sweet. Look at that. I'm already ahead of myself as usual. I thought that was for this article.

Starting point is 01:49:05 Okay, good. Then we saved it. Continuing. While there, for Doge, or excuse me, at this is, oh yeah, working for the Office of Personal Management, as Doge operatives, as we just read,

Starting point is 01:49:19 Hogan signed off on the privacy impact assessment that allowed for the creation of a new email server that Doge used to email the entire federal workforce, some of the so-called agency's most infamous government-wide emails. Another email asked government workers to account for what they were working on each week. Remember that one?

Starting point is 01:49:35 They give us a list of what you're doing. Whether you disagree with the way that went down or not, the point was not about necessarily the checking on their work, which they didn't even really do. They didn't even actually change anything. The point was about the information flow, the infiltration, right? That's what this really was. In my opinion, anyway, and I think many clear, evident, proven examples.

Starting point is 01:49:54 On his LinkedIn, Hogan indicates that he remained the VP of infrastructure atcoma. dot AI until October 2025. So this guy was literally still being funded by Andres and Harowitz while he was, you know, this overlap. And it says to get launched in 2017, login.gov was developed as a way for people to have a single secure account to access services and information across multiple government agencies. It was developed in part by the U.S. digital services, which is now called Doge. Right.

Starting point is 01:50:25 So it's the same thing. This has always been a long-term play. Doge just changed the name and made it into something new and it's all, it's the same, and it was all happening underneath. Now Amy Gleason runs it and they went right back to wearables and digital IDs. You got played, guys. And it says in December 2025, right, right, when he was still being funded, as we showed you, login.org, login.gov released a roadmap detailing plans to integrate mobile driver's licenses

Starting point is 01:50:48 into the service and use passports as a form of identity confirmation. Right. So if he was still working, getting funded by that, that means the very very, at least it's worth asking whether Harrowitz was, you know, specifically, rather Mark Andreessen, specifically, or rather just the company which he's a part of, was funding him and influencing his choices when it was affecting the U.S. government. I think we know, by the way, that that's happening to a larger degree by this influence network, what the question is in this moment and what that might have had affected with the larger agenda. Quote, there's a push to make login a national

Starting point is 01:51:26 ID in the sense that we would retain all info you'd need for any government interaction. In addition to standard ID, name, et cetera, we'd also have income information, citizenship status, info on dependence, et cetera, believes a TPS employee who spoke to Wired on the condition of anonymity for fear of retaliation, obviously, because nobody wants that, and especially the current administration. And so if he gets caught speaking out, of course, they'll probably destroys life. The reality, though, that's a national idea. That's exactly what we've always been fighting. And the idea that you're just, I mean, this is everything we just talked about. It's everything we've been talking about. We mean, this is all these interconnect. You're

Starting point is 01:52:07 literally from one small example showing what we were just talking about, that you're just removing these silent information. You have access to everything in one spot. Everything you'd ever need goes right through this point. This would be a great, would be great. They write, if implemented right, says an employee, with a doge guy in charge, this will look like more like a central repository for surveillance. Says the guy working in the company, or rather with the government entity, and just simply quietly going,

Starting point is 01:52:33 if this ends up in this partisan way, and maybe he's Democrat and a eighth department, that's certainly possible. But that's also what we can see happening, regardless of whether you think it's a partisan thing. It's not. Although Doge in its original form dissolved in June 2025,

Starting point is 01:52:46 but it didn't really. I mean, that's the point. Doge was a name. That's all it was. Doge was the digital services. Gleason is still in charge. It is still there. And Elon Musk,

Starting point is 01:52:54 ruled by a judge is still technically part of this. In an original form resolved in June with billionaire Musk's departure from government, but again, not really. As we just, as he's literally suing a company and Trump's right there with him for AI. And it says many of its operatives still remain in powerful positions across the government. That's what this seems to have been about in part, including at the State Department, Department of Defense, and Social Security Administration. No big deal.

Starting point is 01:53:19 These weird little doge offers got jammed in our government that have connection to all these weird backgrounds and who knows. Others have decamped to a private sector, including to government contractors. Cool. But also realize, you know, that we're talking about these people packed in here. Well, I mean, you know, it's very obvious that we can see this kind of influence, this transition. You know, if you want to talk about like a bloodless coup, that's what these things all collectively look like together. Include these for you. These are articles that you should read and see how far ahead Derek was on this story. He's working on a new article right now. We'll probably be out tomorrow. Oh, and this is just to point this out again, just to show you from this article, the funding coming from Andreessen Harrowitz.

Starting point is 01:54:02 Getting money, and it was $3.1 million in the first round. Now, I'll include the Save Act conversation we had back in 2024. Now, yes, they've made it into the Save America Act, which is just expanding of it. They're just mashing more things together, but the Save Act part of it is still very much a part of it. And that's still very much about enforcing the real ID compliant identification. I just looked at the new part of it recently. So when you then can join, compare,

Starting point is 01:54:27 well, I can't think of the word. When you put these two things together, you get the idea of mobile driver's licenses, right? And passports, digital versions, well then suddenly this is the only possible option. Digital versions, which all, I guess, use one login.gov,

Starting point is 01:54:46 run by this guy tied to, you know, the same thing we just did. It's all concerning to me. Now, Supreme Court grapples with limits to geo-fence warrants over privacy concerns. So think about the, this in conjunction with the same thing. Like, these all feel like separate points. But when you look at it

Starting point is 01:55:02 in one big picture, all of which are tied to what the government's doing, it starts to show you the outlines of what's actually happening. April 28th, a Supreme Court on Monday grappled with whether to impose limits on when and how law enforcement uses so-called geo-fencing warrants to track down a criminal suspect using cell phone location data from a broad swath of users, including people with no connection to a crime. Well, right there, that should be too far. Right there. I don't care what the benefit is unless we're of the mind that we are no longer concerned about the Constitution, which is not what anybody's actually saying, even if they just want you to think they care. But what we're actually getting into here is a person who was charged who actually broke the law,

Starting point is 01:55:40 as it appears, as it doesn't appear that's actually been proven to be guilty, but he seems to be the one that was charged. And if he gets proven to be guilty, well, that's how we're supposed to be in this country, right? Ill innocent until proven guilty? Hardly. Nobody acts in this country. But the point, though, is that whether guilty or not, the case that they point is they use this process to get it.

Starting point is 01:56:00 So in my mind, it's like arresting somebody with no warrant. Why would it be any different? Whether he's guilty or not, you violate the process. That's your responsibility, right? So that's where this ends up going. It says during oral arguments in a landmark case from Virginia, many justices appeared sympathetic to the government's arguments that digital dragnets are a critical tool for solving crime despite, well, yeah, you could argue that. but if those digital drag nets violate your rights, well, they end of the conversation.

Starting point is 01:56:28 It says, despite concerns, they inherently violate Americans' rights. What are you even talking about? Like this game they play where it's like, but is it shall not be infringed or not? Aren't we the ones arguing? These things are inherent to what we believe. So why is it somehow like, let's debate whether or not.

Starting point is 01:56:43 It shouldn't be something we discuss. Because if you violate that, if it's repugnant to the Constitution, and it's no one void based on Supreme Court rulings, and there's no conversation to be had here. Quote, if you don't want the government to have your location history, you just flip that off. Yeah, it's simple as that, isn't it? Because it's not like we've proven to 50 million times over the top that that doesn't actually do anything,

Starting point is 01:57:05 or if they want to, they can get it a thousand other ways. It's like saying, well, you know, you check the box. We don't want you to use it. And then you find out a year later, they sold it anyway. I mean, how many times do we need to go through this? Referring to the common privacy settings on most phones. Right. is if you don't want them to peer into your pride window,

Starting point is 01:57:24 you close your window shades. Is that really your argument? Let's say, if you don't, you know, if you're not guilty, what do you have to hide? That's a justice in the Supreme Court. Maybe they shouldn't be peering in your window because that's violating your privacy whether or not your shades are closed.

Starting point is 01:57:40 You should, it's the idea of a, what's the term they use? You know, the expectation of privacy. You shouldn't be that you, like the way the world is now is it's like they're always looking. so close your windows if you don't. That's not the way that's supposed to be. That's not the way that's supposed to be from the day one point. Like the, that's, it's unconstitutional what they're doing.

Starting point is 01:57:59 It's the easiest way to frame it because it is, guys. This is unconstitutional. Geoffense warrants compel service providers such as Google, Verizon, to turn over location history and timestamps from all cell phones within a specified area over specified time frame. It's much more than that. A single warrant can yield data on a large number of individuals, often without their knowledge.

Starting point is 01:58:20 normally authorities ask a judge for a warrant with specific requests on a specific individual organization. Now normally, that's it. That's the legal reality. What you're going to notice today, how crazy it is that we have the New York Times, ABC News, NPR, like literally gaslighting for Donald Trump. It's very obvious, especially when it comes to Iran. But defenders of the practice insist access to the information.

Starting point is 01:58:50 is fair game. Of course they do. Critics say the warrant constitutes an unreasonable search forbidden by the Fourth Amendment. You see what I'm saying? It's like saying, well, you know, the law says, but others argue that that's not the case. Well, does the law say it or not? So you're not arguing it doesn't say it. You're arguing it shouldn't matter, you see. And that's a dishonest way to frame that. Quote, I think one should be permitted to hand over data to a third party without assuming the government's going to look at it. Yes, especially since you check those stupid boxes that say they won't do it anyway. And now they're going, but our legal warrants will look at, they know this, guys. So now think about that little side step right there, right? The box

Starting point is 01:59:25 says, I don't want that to happen. Then they go, but warrant, even though it's not really warrant, it's this geo-fencing manipulation. So think about the many different ways that can happen that aren't considered, the things we don't see, the ways they can go, oh, but this little deviation will allow us to look at that without you knowing it, and we don't even know they're there. They do that with everything. I'm sorry, if you don't understand how dark things are. I mean, again, I argue the point is that people are seeing these things because it's a positive change that's happening. But we're in a bad time. It's obvious. Our government is a bad, it's doing terrible things and it's important that we just be honest about that. But I'm sorry to

Starting point is 02:00:00 you know, break your your illusions about this if that's what's happening. But you need, people need to understand what's happening. The Trump administration, which is defending the person what's name is Chatri's prosecution, argues that by sharing location information with apps, and service providers like Google, you forfeit your expectation of privacy. That is the Donald Trump administration. Despite the fact that that's not the, you have the idea that you're working with something and saying I don't want to share my data, which by the way, maybe not everybody does that, but the point is that that's what a lot of people are doing and then finding out it still doesn't matter.

Starting point is 02:00:38 But the idea that what Trump is saying or the administration, that by simply working using a Google app that you forfeit expectations of privacy, see, that's just not true. That's what the world they're creating. They want to use that carve-out to say, well, here's why we can look at your entire life without justification. If you're out there going, yeah, because, then that means, I mean, I'll leave it at that. Most telecom providers stipulate in the fine print of consumer contracts that certain data stored in the cloud is not entirely private. And maybe turn out at the bottom of a 75-page fine-print thing that nobody reads. Maybe turned over to the law enforcement, if ordered by a court, individuals can turn off location,

Starting point is 02:01:16 sharing to their device and ensure privacy, but many people do not. Also, even if you do, sometimes it doesn't matter at all. It would also affect Google Photos, Google Documents, Google Calendar. Your entire calendar noted just as Sonia Sotomayor. Yeah, but she's a Democrat, so who cares? Dumb people say things like that. Whether or not she is, whether or not she only cares of one thing. The point is what should matter.

Starting point is 02:01:40 Is the point valid, regardless of who said it? That's what intelligent people do. It would also affect Google phones. Google documents, Google Calendar. So now you're telling me that if I have a calendar, if I'm using Google calendars, which, by the way, comes on my phone, whether I want it or not, I have no expectation of privacy. You know, you might have read that other one and going, well, you know, Trump, it's about the fighting criminals and they're not violating it.

Starting point is 02:02:03 And then you find out, oh, well, they are violating it because what they're saying is, if you own a phone, therefore, yeah, you have no expectation of privacy. Sadly, that's what we probably should have known for years by now. But challenge these things. If this is consent, that means the government can seek those documents for any reason. Not just commission of a crime or no reason, right? Correct, says the lawyer. That's not a joke.

Starting point is 02:02:29 So what they effectively did is saying we can spy on you for any reason at any moment all the time because you use these apps. Now, let's just say you remove that. There's probably 75 other things just like that that they used or justify why they can break the rules. you really are saying that you could track someone going inside a home about movements inside their home movements in the bathroom movements in the bedroom all of that if the confidence interval is narrow enough Barrett asked the deputy solicitor general I do think we could have done that here because of a warrant is what he said think about how insane that is it seems to me we should set some parameters reasonable temporal scope reasonable geographic scope but then we trust it but then

Starting point is 02:03:13 We trust issuing magistrates around the country to implement those rules. That's Kavanaugh. For generations, cops have obtained warrants to lawfully seek information from a specific suspect in a crime. And they violated that a thousand different ways the entire time, well, as well, some of them anyway. But geo-fetch warrants can do the reverse. Scanning cell phone data out of thousands of innocent individuals in hopes of finding a suspect to apprehend. That's called pre-crime stuff. guys. Google received 9,000 warrants in 2019 alone, seeking cell phone location data information,

Starting point is 02:03:50 most of which they were given, it seems. Yeah, but let's reinitiate FISA 20702, right, because that'll add to the positive change for the winning that we're all experiencing. Before we get to that again, Palantir is helping Trump's IRS conduct massive scale data mining, April 24th, 2026. Military contractor Palantir is helping the IRS analyze dozens of different data sets on Americans to investigate a broad range of financial crimes, according to records shared with the intercept. Since 2018, the IRS's criminal investigations division has used Palantir. This is 2018.

Starting point is 02:04:27 And it's called Palantir's lead and case analytics platform to aggregate and analyze a sprawling list of sensitive federal databases and data sets. Public records detailing Palantir's IRS contract obtained by the nonprofit watchdog group America Oversight has shared exclusively with the intercept. reveal the immense volume of data. Plugged into the military contractor software, the LCA uses both Palantir's Gotham and Foundry applications to facilitate. I'll play a couple clips about those in a second.

Starting point is 02:04:58 Analysis of massive scale data to find the needle in the haystack, or to tell you they found it, documents indicate the IRS has paid Palantir over 130 million for those services to date. the IRS's use of the software launched under Trump's first term, important, I think, and of course expanded under Biden's term, important, I think, is now in the hands of an IRS criminal investigation's office that has drastically scaled back its pursuit of tax cheats and pivoted, of course, you know, away from the thing they told you they were doing and pivoted towards investigating left-leading groups,

Starting point is 02:05:33 which really just mean anybody calling out Israel and we'll call it Antifa. I mean, guys, hopefully you're already along with all this and you see exactly what this is really about. Aimed at you. Simple as that. The real concern is the consolidation of vast amounts of sensitive personal data into a single system with minimal transparency, especially one built and operated by a contractor like Palantir, whose business model is premised on integrating data and expanding surveillance capabilities. said American oversight director Chaioma Kuqa. Palantir's LCA allows the IRS to quickly search and visualize connections from millions of records with thousands of links between databases maintained by IRS and other federal agencies.

Starting point is 02:06:20 Thank you for the unsalowed restrictions or the lack of them with Doge and Palantir and just removing all of our data, which, by the way, Israel gained access to as well, verifiably. all that's all that so they can just that's access to everything all the time to private companies who sell your data and train their AI models on your personal information and on top of that search and visualize now do you ever all this went down during the the kind of height of that previous moment remember all the antifa what happened with that that's right what happened cash Patel what happened with your your current lawsuit against atlantic oh it looks like it's floundering and failing spectacularly because you were i guess put out there to be embarrassed to distract

Starting point is 02:06:59 everybody? I don't know. But Antifa, the Halloween thing. Like, are we just pretending those didn't happen? And you realize that they use this very, that's why I'm bringing it up. They use this to just create false networks. Now, look, I'm not saying, as you know, if you're paying attention, that the Antifa element are not manipulated, whatever you think that is. And it's really just a name for whatever they want to call the current thing they're using, like a Patriot Front. My point is that clearly there's manipulation there. Those things are used against us. That is like everything else we're talking about, right but what they did is simply create this false network illusion by saying every one of these groups are all connected therefore it's antifa well what you're looking at are people who text

Starting point is 02:07:39 and work together to protest and yes probably within that there's all sorts of manipulated infiltrated groups that want to manipulate it for this or for profit or for advertising or for the government who knows happens on left happens on right anybody who's with a brain and who's not partisan blinded can already see that but what i'm pointing to here is how palatier created some false thing they pointed to. They told us in front of Congress they had this whole big network, but couldn't tell you where the base was, couldn't tell you was in charge, couldn't tell any members they had. It's embarrassing. Just like everything else, it was designed to make you think, everything's coming down, and they didn't do anything. The program places an emphasis on mapping

Starting point is 02:08:16 social relationships between the target of an investigation. And that very well may mean something. It also could create the illusion of something, but it also could lead them in a wrong direction if they're being guided by their own hubris narcissism and blind partisan hatred. That includes analyzing a network of people and the relationships and communications between them. Okay, well, now you're back to that same point. This guy did something. Now we can look at every one of their conversations and their grandmother and their children. Like, that's illegal.

Starting point is 02:08:45 That's unconstitutional, but they don't care. It says such as calls, text, emails events. The use of IP address analysis within LCA allows the IRS to identify, identifies suspects more easily or assume that they might be suspects based on subjective conversations and establish new relationships among actors. Or they said Palestine, therefore they must be what we pretend they are. Of course, the investigative functions are continuously updated, basically meaning that there's constantly adding more information and more data about you, digital twin style is what we're talking about. The use of Palantir software at the UK's

Starting point is 02:09:19 National Health Service, for example, has created an ongoing political controversy across Britain. You see, it's not just the United States. Problematic, guys, this is happening a lot of places in the world. While a similar contract with the New York City Public Hospital Network was recently canceled following public protest for obvious reasons. Last year, the New York Times reported that Palantir founded by Trump, Trump ally Peter Thiel, was central to an administration's effort to increase data sharing across federal agencies. Yeah, well, you know that. For those that didn't know what that just described what I just said, the removal of all these silent information. databases where now it's just wide open and abused, violating your rights.

Starting point is 02:09:59 The company's right-wing politics and eagerness to facilitate U.S. and Israeli military aggression abroad, NSA global surveillance and ICE deportations has also made many wary of its access to incredibly sensitive personal data. Unnerved by the manifesto's fascistic bent, and that was the technological republic put up by Alex Karp or also the well it says a recent post by the company summarizing the book that they did

Starting point is 02:10:28 there's also one put up by teal there's many different examples of the actual images we used for the show today shows that on the Palantir orb but the point is that many people were rightly outraged about what they were highlighting as they write a fascistic bent the bullet points extolled the virtue of arms

Starting point is 02:10:44 manufacturing argued the axes of powers were unfairly punished after World War II. Think about that for a reinstatement of the draft, condemned cultural pluralism, and claimed that wealthy elites are unfairly persecuted. When the government can map relationships, track behavior, and generate investigative leads

Starting point is 02:11:08 across data sets at this scale, the question isn't just what it can do. It's who it will be used against, says the Chukwu, the director of the, the platform speaking about this. It was Chuqua, shukwu, excuse me.

Starting point is 02:11:24 Intrusting that infrastructure into a company known for opaque security state deployments only heightens those risks. Quite obviously. I'm just glad people are calling this stuff out, guys. And there's a couple of clips.

Starting point is 02:11:36 This is posted by Jake here. Now, I've played this before. I just want to point out ahead of time that what the guy says is a platform, a software called Palantir. What he means is Gotham. Made by Palantir. But important to see,

Starting point is 02:11:48 and then we'll play a clip of my discussion with Zoe and her important post about a lot of this stuff. And all of this is showing you is Palantir's connection to everything, but in this case, specifically health, CDC, and, you know, everything, immigration, everything we just highlighted plus, you know, and look, I don't want to be too hyperbolic. I guarantee there are elements that aren't completely, Jason Bassler just pointed out. It was something like 27 plus government bodies that Palantir is now managing. I don't know why one would not be too far for people.

Starting point is 02:12:26 People have seen a police program that's being used called Palantir. It is in your police officer's car on your police officer's computer. So while you've got the person pulled over, you can start to drill down on this person. It's not just like a DMV photo and an NCIC anymore. You can see all their bank accounts, the balance in their bank accounts. The last times they declared cash somewhere, you can see every time they hit a flock camera anywhere in the country. Flock is a giant national traffic monitoring system

Starting point is 02:12:57 that is basically everywhere now. And they're taking photographs at every intersection all day, and it's using AI to read license plates and put identities of people places, and it's just keeping all that data, like all of it. That's what they've got in their car right now, and we're not getting that in discovery. We're not able to confront it,

Starting point is 02:13:14 and we're not able to use it as Brady evidence. We've got Fourth Amendment issues galore, obviously. I didn't realize how prevalent it was. There has never been a surveillance program in the history of the United States that was not used brutally in a corrupt fashion. And now we have the biggest surveillance system that we've ever had. Correct. Here's one with Zoe. And the sense receptor kind of quoted most of it, but I'll just play it for you.

Starting point is 02:13:45 Zoe was a formal medical coder. She wrote the book about the COVID-19 timeframe and the awareness of what was actually happening. We did a couple interviews with her. she wrote a couple of series. We put both part one and part two on our substack, medical surveillance, the illusion of the medical privacy. Here's what she had to say about specifically these programs

Starting point is 02:14:02 and more than just one of them. No, for sure, Palantir Epic 3M, which are programs that I use personally in multiple hospital systems. They're used all throughout the country, are directly partnered with Palantir. For two different programs, there's a program called Foundry,

Starting point is 02:14:21 and there's a program called, I forget the other. There were ones used for Operation Warp Speed that I don't know if they were used, like, directly in hospitals, but they had to be fed into that program per Medicare rules. And that was, I think, Tiberius. I think there were many, many programs. Yeah. Yeah.

Starting point is 02:14:48 Yeah. Well, one thing I wanted to bring up, too, is so Epic and Palantir are partnered, And I believe they use the same platform for their programs. So this comes in part two when I start talking about the drones that Palantir is also involved in. And they're using right now in Gaza based on AI and facial recognition and your medical record data and your genomic information. So they're using all of that to target people. And the way that Epic works is they have multiple programs that are in like their, their main program. So they'll have different suites. And from different hospitals, they change the

Starting point is 02:15:29 name. So it might not even be called Epic at a different hospital. So later on in part two, when I talk about how Palantir has these healthcare programs that were Operation Warpspeed, that was Gotham and Tiberius, well, all they have to do is change the name of that program. And it's the same program. It does the same thing. They just change the name for like a different institution. and they kind of personalize it a little bit for their personal use. But it does the same functions, basically, for different clients. So I would put all my money in the basket that says Palantir uses that same trick. So when I say Palantir has a program called Tiberius and Gotham that's used in healthcare,

Starting point is 02:16:11 and then I say that Palantir also has these programs in Gaza, or we think Palantir has these programs in Gaza called Where's Daddy? and Lavender that are being used for drone assassinations, all they have to do is take those program names, Tiberius and Gotham, and change them to Where's Daddy and Lavender? And it's the same program. Right. Now, her work important, and you should definitely check it out.

Starting point is 02:16:40 This is our substack point, or our post, where we basically reposted her work on that, on that specific two-part series. But they all include her substact. stack as well. It's where I'm from me like the link that I had for her book's not working. I was going to include that for you. Here I'll include this. I'm sure it's it's in her substack somewhere. The one I had saved to the side, uh, it just looks like it's a dead link. That's why I was trying to search for it just now. Here is her substack as well. Oh,

Starting point is 02:17:17 here, my videos down. There we go. Make sure you check it out. The book, it's crazy. It's the craziest stuff. And this came out, this came out right, you know, if this had been given the right range of deserved, people would have changed their minds earlier. And the book is my life in the thrill kill medical cult. Now here is one thing she was talking about. CDC further expands the use of Palantir's Tiberius forum. That was a platform, excuse me, February 22nd, 2022. How long this has been happening? It's not just in this administration. It's just that it's been kind of Coleman. It's in, you know, it seems like the finishing touches are being put on this right now. That's what it feels like to me.

Starting point is 02:17:59 So, by the way, if you guys in the chat can put, if you have the link, by the way, for a book, gar up for me. I'll put it. I'll put it in the, I'll throw it up in the show so people can grab it. And then I'll, this is just to finish these last couple points on the Pallantir side of it. Here's a Pallantir said. On 2025 June, they said the recently published article about the New York Times, which was calling out what they're actually doing.

Starting point is 02:18:20 Doesn't mean you should trust the New York Times. But what they said was correct. Blatently untrue, just like they come out and say, the Atlantic article was blatantly untrue. about my drinking and then just sues and loses and doesn't matter. Obviously, it's obvious what these people are. Palantir never collects data to unlawfully surveil Americans. Are you effing kidding me?

Starting point is 02:18:41 It's just insane. And our Foundry platform employs granular security protections. If the facts were on our side, your time, did you sue them? Did you win? Did you make it take it down? No, you didn't do any those things. Derek Brose includes his article here. If anyone wants to read the real truth of Palantir, read this.

Starting point is 02:18:57 And one I usually include, all I'm including. it here just in case. Welcome to the Palantir World Order, 2025. And back to this point. After everything we just covered as well, right? Don't forget, the House just passed FISA 702 and are yet again doing the thing both left and right that they always told you

Starting point is 02:19:22 they hated whenever they are the adversarial party and they want to use it to illegally spy on you. And that's not even getting into the geo fencing side of it. That's what I was saying earlier. There's probably countless things like this we don't even realize they're using until we later find out. and they don't care about these things. I mean, this is Mike Johnson, Donald Trump,

Starting point is 02:19:38 who are justifying this for the military. I'll give up some of my rights to be able to do. Well, no, we won't, Trump. In fact, nobody agrees with that. You got more pushback on that statement than almost anything. Maybe for the, you know, lying about the Epstein files are going to war with Iran. But overall, it's obvious that people, I mean,

Starting point is 02:19:55 your very base was most important was about these things. And now you're telling us to give these up for what? To support the thing that you told them, you wouldn't do. Come on, guys. Nobody would go along with that other than blind lying followers. Let's not forget as well that Palantir has a direct strategic partnership with Israel. And they joined that at the hip in the height of the disgusting ongoing genocide and support

Starting point is 02:20:21 them to this very day. And that matters to me. And here is an overlap to just this general direction. Here is Melania with the royalty from the UK, who totally no big deal. It's not weird at all. even though I should just point out that's common for presidential things, but I just think it's funny that we're talking about the royalty from, you know, the one that Trump was talking about maybe joining the Commonwealth, you know, no big deal.

Starting point is 02:20:43 But here they are at the White House. And it's a, as Frankie Stokes, right, dystopia. Today at the White House, Melania and the Queen, and kids with meta-vr headsets strapped to their faces as part of some AI-powered cross-cultural educational program. The latest installment of the First Lady's K-12 AI-C. surveillance state grooming initiative. That's how he frames it.

Starting point is 02:21:06 But guys, I mean, what in the, I mean, I just don't understand how they would think this would make sense with the people that they told you. It's the same old thing. Yeah, welcome to the future that you were fighting against Democrats. Now Trump's doing it. It's good, though. Now it's good. Now it's a good thing.

Starting point is 02:21:21 Chris May, Menahan points out this post from I-24 in Israel. Anyone can do it. Kids, anyone. They're talking about the extend, the Israeli AI-powered killer drone company that recently merged with Eric Trump's construction firm. No problem there. It's just normal corruption. This same old thing in this country says their drones are so easy to operate that even

Starting point is 02:21:41 a child can do it. Where the world's going, guys? I mean, it's just the normalization of everything we've been fighting. Now, to talk about some distraction, deflection before we finish with the Iran conversation, I just am blown away by the stupidity of what these, this is directly from Abba, only to Abba. Like, this isn't some tangential redactual. post that they kind of lightly point to or share 100% like Elon Musk.

Starting point is 02:22:08 No, this is Aba showing a video and this is the Q Stormwriter, one of these people you should definitely laugh at that says Donald Trump's advisor, Aba discovered the fake Oval Office where Joe Biden allegedly pretended to be president. Well, she doesn't say allegedly, by the way, so I don't know why you say allegedly, but it says the room includes a teleprompter position directly in front of him. So to get this straight. So you, in the White House, you find a room that's set up to look like, like a part of the White House where they film in the White House using teleprompter for White House to

Starting point is 02:22:37 know. So what? You found a secondary room where they filmed things that was meant to look like the Oval Office? So the big scam is that they pretended to be in the Oval Office while in the White House. I mean, what are you guys jumping at right now? Look, I understand, and I will be the, Biden is a criminal. And there's plenty of weird things to point at that they will claim as absolute that I don't think I can verify. Well, you should consider whatever you think, whether he's got body doubles, which every leader of, I'm of the mind does employ. But whether that's what has been used in the past or not, or you jump at it.

Starting point is 02:23:08 Oh, he's got a foot boot on or whatever the new thing is from Q said to point. The whole setup looks like a whole it was. So apparently this is him faking being president from the White House. I mean, you guys are just ridiculous. That doesn't make sense to me. But anyway, the bottom line is the level of utter BS you guys are put, and this is asking GROC, and it's like that session is not really true.

Starting point is 02:23:32 It's a hyperbolic statement. But Rock can lie too, right? This Republic. If Grock says so, it has to be true. Okay, wait a minute now. Just for fun's sake, you got a Q Trump thing. This Elon Musk platform who's, so, and you're telling me that Grock, Grock says must, which is listening to Grock, who's made by Elon Musk,

Starting point is 02:23:51 it tells you that you guys are lying about things that aren't happening is somehow them being, what, a Democrat? I mean, what's your argument there? It's just so funny to me how this can be. That's often why I use Grock to throw in the face. of partisans who don't want to listen to the reality, even though Grok can lie. It's something that I can prove is the truth. Because it's a funny point to watch them go, oh, yeah, Grock says.

Starting point is 02:24:08 It's like, are you confused right now? This is funny to me. But overall, the idea here is that this is somehow some big thing that proves that Biden faked it. Okay, let's just say that was the case because this is really what I'm getting at. Do you think they're going to do anything about it? Do you think that Biden's going to be? If they have this like some bombshell report from some ridiculous Q person on Twitter, don't you think he'd already be arrested if it was a big crime?

Starting point is 02:24:30 you get it what a stupidity all this is and it's crazy reach a million views and this is lit of my point this isn't some this is a person within his administration doing this this is not some side ridiculousness this is the white house putting out what they want you to believe is some kind of a bombshell that shows that Biden faked being president and then did nothing about it totally makes sense doesn't it god it's just infuriating and by the way apparently he's going to give you information about UFOs and i just said yeah so they're apparently breaking case of emergency desperate. I figured as much, but I wasn't entirely sure.

Starting point is 02:25:05 Here is what Nick Sorter told you. It was all coming out, but even the way he says this is funny to me. So first of all, it says President Trump confirms. Confirms. His administration will be declassifying UFO files immediately. Eminently, excuse me. Okay, listen to what Trump says here, and you tell me if that translates to confirms, he'll declassify it eminently.

Starting point is 02:25:31 You already know it's not going to be that. These guys are such clown shows. First on the topic of space, do you have an update on the UFO files and what might be when we're going to be seeing this? Well, I think we're going to be releasing as much as we can in the near future for some reason. Before we get into whatever he does next,

Starting point is 02:25:49 which is hard to listen to. So we're going to look into releasing what we can at some point. Breaking news. Trump confirms. He's going to do it right now. That's what that turn. He's got the video. in his post. Like, okay, I'm convinced these people are not, they don't genuinely don't care about their own. They just are there either to make money off of this weird dynamic or their job is

Starting point is 02:26:12 literally to do whatever, like to distract, even if they look like absolute fools, like Cash Patel in his weird lawsuit just to get you to look away and maybe even make fun of cash so you don't make fun of Trump. I'm blown away. Listen to it again. topic of space do you have an update on the UFO files and what might be when we're going to be seeing well i think we're going to be releasing as much as we can in the near future for some reason much as we can which means they're probably not going to happen though it's usual government lingo right we'll see we'll sign this thing to look into the studies of maybe doing more on this in the room oh guess what you're never going to get room saying that what that means is we're going to

Starting point is 02:26:52 string you along and use joe rogan to make you think we're doing something we'll sign this that we'll look into the things we've already looked into a lot. I don't know why people fall for these things anymore. Okay. But so he goes, we'll look into it, maybe. Then he goes on to make this weird statement about what drove this into reality. And apparently, you listen, it's can't even, hard to even frame. For some reason, as much as we can in the near future, for some reason.

Starting point is 02:27:19 And I guess it's just a reason it's been in the minds of people for a long time. Okay. for some reason. You know, and I guess it's just a reason that's been in people's minds for a long time. And that is such, they want to find out about the UFOs? And that is such that they want to find out about UFOs. Wow, that's what you had to like theorize and contextualize.

Starting point is 02:27:39 You know, it's a grand thought that they've had for this long time they want to know about UFOs. Okay, so I'm pretty sure he had no idea what he's going to say right there. And he just kind of does what that's, that's what he does every single day every time he opens his mouth. I just had to make fun of that. It's just in plain possibly funny and stupid. But let's keep listening.

Starting point is 02:28:00 Reason for some reason, and I guess it's just a reason it's been in the minds of people for a long time. Yeah. And that is such, they want to find out about the UFOs. You could have just said people want to know about UFOs. The reason is grand old reason that is such that we should, but they want to know. Anything having to do with UFO or related material. I'm going to be releasing a lot of things from that we have. And I think so...

Starting point is 02:28:30 Okay. Anything. Anything. And such, they want to find those. And anything having to do with UFO or related... Anything having to do with UFO. And we're going to be releasing a lot of things. And we're going to be releasing a lot of things.

Starting point is 02:28:43 That we have. And I think some... That we haven't. Okay. Well, that's really clear. So you could pretend that means we're going to do everything. But it's very... Language and the meaning of words will probably show you that that means probably nothing.

Starting point is 02:28:56 interesting to people. I've interviewed people, my first term primarily, but I interviewed some pilots, very solid people, and they said they saw things that you wouldn't believe. So the stuff we already know, got it. Pilots said they saw things while flying. Bombshell. You're going to be reading about it, yes. I'm sure. I'm sure. Now, here's the thing, guys. I just want, that's just ridiculously stupid. and it's just a specially ridiculous thing he kind of does all the time. But who knows?

Starting point is 02:29:29 Maybe it will actually be something. Because my mind is that this is something that would be done to like I jokingly called it the break in a case of emergency deflection or desperation. Because there's been, in case you're new to the whatever you want to call the people, spiritual, the idea of what's called Project Blue Beam, it's a real thing. I mean, the idea to be able to project like very realistic looking graph, like laser presentations, like that look real. Like that you wouldn't be, I've already, I've seen some of these things.

Starting point is 02:29:58 Like in China, I've seen one that like, it's wild. It literally looks real. And so the point is wondering whether that will be like a level we've yet to see that projects, I don't know, the aliens coming. And then, oh, well, now we have to have the government is one to, you know, that's kind of the idea or the second coming. That's the two generally talked about theories around that. I mean, imagine if they did something that made it look realistically like

Starting point is 02:30:22 there was some kind of a second coming. You know as well as I, far too many people would just take it at face value. I mean, because how would you, I mean, a lot of people would feel like they had to. You know, it's a very manipulative. So the point would be wondering whether or not that's something that's done in a moment of desperation. If you think that's what they're at right now, I kind of do. I feel like there at a point where this is, things are collapsing. They're imploding.

Starting point is 02:30:45 It's becoming worse and worse. And I'm wondering whether or not there's going to be something like that. So all that aside, I'm not even saying, I'd say I put it at 50-50. Like I don't, I'm not saying I think. that's going to happen, but it's possible based on the circumstances. So that being said, me joking about all that may amount to the fact that they come out and give you something, but is that going to be the reality? Right. I mean, I doubt, I don't know why that would make sense to anybody. And why now, why in the midst of an ongoing genocide, a war,

Starting point is 02:31:12 they're embarrassed by a failing administration that's lowest point of admitted. That's why. I think that's quite obvious. But, you know, you could pretend that makes sense that they would do this at this point. It just doesn't. Or, okay, one final thought, maybe it is all real. And the same justification, right? Fine. Give them the data about the things we know. Get them off my back. You know, either way. Pretty interesting to see where this goes.

Starting point is 02:31:40 But I just, I hope you agree. It's like just watching that. It's like, you know, it makes you wonder who actually watches these things and goes, hmm, this guy's great. And he just perfect, just, he's honest and says what do you mean. It's like, it's just, it's like you can, it's inherent in the way. way he talks that he's being manipulative. You know what I mean? It kills me. And again, if you take that as some kind of a partisan point, you're just really not paying

Starting point is 02:32:01 attention. I mean, Biden is just as problematic for very different reasons, but and plenty of the same reasons. Now, and this was the same kind of point of the joking stuff or rather just the same kind of, and I didn't want to point out the things that Alex Jones was doing in regard to Trump because I think it's relevant to what we've talked about. I recently pointed this out. He, Alex Jones comes out and says, the wef and UN just confessed to

Starting point is 02:32:23 committing a massive biological weapons crime talking about the in the same video we played a thousand times and this is an older one it's from years ago and it's just a scientist not even necessarily at this web thing just talking about the idea of alpha gal syndrome and the tick right and this is all it's in we've talked about it so it's a lot of people it's been a common conversation the point is he came out on the 27th and just randomly said the weapon you n confirmed and confessed and admitted all this no not as far as i can tell here's grok in case that means more to you no not true now It's not because I asked Rock. I looked into it myself and checked everywhere I thought it would be

Starting point is 02:32:56 and did this to make the point to partisans who would not want to hear that because you listen to the UN? No, no, I just checked my facts. Did this happen? No, it's not true. There's no evidence. There's a recent confession. So why?

Starting point is 02:33:08 Question is why, right? I said, other than running cover for this obvious globalist administration, I can't figure out why you would so willingly embarrass yourself like this. And also, by the way, as I said before, I just find this hilarious that it's actually what this says. I said out, oh, it's down here. It's the second part of it. I said, in your opinion, Grock,

Starting point is 02:33:25 is Alex Jones a deliberately dishonest person? And it says, in my view, yes. Alex Jones is often deliberately dishonest, though not in a cartoonish, everything is fabricated way, whatever that means. Which, by the way, that changed. See, this is my point about Grock, man.

Starting point is 02:33:42 There's something weird as hell about this. You see the difference? I took a screenshot of this same link. Look, yes, based on the evidence. Oh, wait, no, this might be. might be a separate one. Oh yeah, yeah. So I'm sorry, I take that back. But either way, not that I need to make this point now, but I do want to do a deeper point about Grock and the way this stuff is being used. It's very weird. Some of this background stuff. I told you about the

Starting point is 02:34:06 different IDs for the posts and how these things seem to be swapped. It's very strange. But in any case, the real point was about the idea of people trying to deflect from what's going on with what just wholesale, whole cloth lies, just for no reason. I find that very, very obvious. And like I said, told you. Alex came out in 21st and said, for the first time, Trump just attacked the heart of the deep state. Oh,

Starting point is 02:34:29 you mean the deep state that you literally just insinuated he was a part of? The group that you just said was occupied by a foreign power, which, by the way, that tweet seems to have been deleted, and I literally can't find it anywhere. You guys all saw, I did it right on the show. I was literally talking about this,

Starting point is 02:34:44 and I said, oh my God, he's saying that Trump has changed and he's turned on everybody, whenever we talked about it. And I poned it in his post, and it said, occupied by a four. power. And he was talking about Israel. That's what he said in the clip. So I said, Alex, didn't you just tell us that he was occupied, sold out, blah, blah, blah. Now he's fighting the deep state again.

Starting point is 02:35:02 Okay. Well, that means, you can argue it's a little bit he's doing that, but he's still sold out. Well, here we are today. He brings on Mark Dice, of course, perfect. And it says, we cannot sit out during the midterms. And of course, he captioned this because that's embarrassing based on what he was just talking about. So the government occupied by a foreign power, but support their choices, because that lines up? This is sad. And he says, just because a lot of us are upset at bad things that Trump has been doing

Starting point is 02:35:28 doesn't mean we give up an abandoned political process to the deranged left. My position is based in logic. Thanks for, thou doth protest too much. My position's logical. You know, it's debatable. And I said, I knew it.

Starting point is 02:35:44 You are so predictable, it's embarrassing. But didn't you just tell us that this admin was occupied by a foreign power? I agree. but what this effectively says, Alex, is that you are more concerned with the left than you are with Israel. I really want that to register with the people

Starting point is 02:35:58 who may still be thinking this. Okay, with what he just has done by saying, well, you know, bad things, but the left is deranged. Okay, you just said it was occupied by Israel. So your point is, the left is crazy, but by the way, the left also supported by Israel, also they support Israel.

Starting point is 02:36:16 But who cares about that contradiction? The point is you're saying left crazy, so I'm momentarily less concerned with the occupied foreign power government. You just can't miss this right now. That is obscene. And it shows you that he's choosing. What he's really doing in my opinion is trying to deflect back the left because that's the bread and butter.

Starting point is 02:36:35 That's the lowest hanging fruit. And hopefully getting you to ignore that he just, I don't even know why he said that. But again, the tweet appears to be removed. I'd love for someone to send it to me so I could make the point. I look pretty damn hard. Apparently, anyway, you know. know it was there. I played it on the show myself. When I have time, I'm going to go back and try to find the show like I usually do and give you the actual image. But here's what he said on February

Starting point is 02:36:59 2025. Netanyahu's next move could spark global war. Is Trump being set up? The globalists want war. Watch this and share. But weirdly, it's not even there, which I'm not even sure why. See if it's gone. No, it's still there. So, and as I said here, oh, the same point. You'll frame it. However, Elon and Trump ultimately do. Mark my words, even though it's quite obvious that you know Israel's driving the U.S. to make war with Iran. 2025. Even Harats blatantly stating that. But again, you'll float the doubt, then double down on whatever Trump and Elon say. Watch. And I knew it. It's where we are, guys. Just think that's important. Now, if you, this is about the, if not the, one of the most influential, you know, mainstream alternative influences.

Starting point is 02:37:53 This guy has more audience than the corporate media. So this is like calling out Fox and CNN, guys. That's what this is important for because people listen to these guys, which still blows my mind, but I know. I know people. I have somebody personally close to me that up until very recently was like, this guy's always on point. And now he sees it.

Starting point is 02:38:14 Now he's just looking for the next person, frankly. You know, the next person in line, the next rush replacement. hopefully they'll catch on. Now here is the one of many examples I could show you. This is the conservative alternative. And it simply says this is on the 27th. And this is an AI image it looks like. Jady Vance, Marker Rubio, Pete Hegseth, Stephen Miller.

Starting point is 02:38:39 People destroying the country. The people, Israel only infiltrated. No, no, no. These, he says, are the four men that we need to rally around. They are the future of the MAGA movement. Right. The people that hated Trump, every one of them, before they got in this position, the people that said that he was a loser, you know,

Starting point is 02:38:55 oh, yeah, that makes sense, but also the fact that what they represent is the thing currently contradicting what MAGA wanted. So here's we have to understand. I actually think this is, I mean, let's just say for sake of conversation, this is a real person who believes this. Because I do think they exist. I don't think it's the majority. How do you make sense of this? So MAGA is what they're doing now, not what they promised what MAGA was going to be? How does that make sense. Or as you're somehow arguing that the only things are happening is because they're forced to to fight the left. I don't even know how you make sense of this. But that's what people are doing. For him, saving MAGA. And then if you read the comments, which is insane, he says half the comments are saying,

Starting point is 02:39:36 no, they're too extreme. And the other half are saying, no, they're not extreme enough. It's honestly exhausting. It's that response that makes me feel like this is real. And what's crazy to me is think about what that shows you. So you have this, you have half, you have the MAGA movement. And you have people that are like, no way, those guys are lunatics. They don't support what we're doing. I mean, it's all down there. You can read it.

Starting point is 02:39:59 Looks like we're just buffering a little bit. It looks like my end looks okay. It looks like it might be YouTube alone, but, oh well. But half of them saying these guys aren't on our side. Please look at the comments. It's crazy. And then most of the other ones going, no, no, they're not going far enough. I mean, what does that show you?

Starting point is 02:40:16 It shows you, in my opinion. This is just my take. You could argue it's basically just split the movement. That's obvious. First point. But my opinion, you have an example of people who actually are MAGA, who are in the chat going, no way, man. These guys lied. They actually hate Trump. They're not doing what they promised. They're crazy. They're extreme. They work for Israel. It's all down there. Look. Many of which you can look at their accounts and go, yeah, that guy's clearly, he voted for Trump.

Starting point is 02:40:42 But then you get the other half, which I believe aren't real. Either the Knicks order types, the bot types, the whatever else, the astroturfing on this platform that was designed. to do that. And even with that, you still get this, half and half. Not going to be wrong about that, but my God, I think it's pretty obvious, guys. I think it's clear that everyone who ever supported them is now seeing that they've lied to them, where even Alex Jones, for crying out loud, was going there occupied by Israel. They see it. And this is just the effort from this platform run by obvious elements like CHEQ and Authentics to get you to think you're wrong, to make you doubt what you see with your own eyes.

Starting point is 02:41:22 Now, one point about nuclear testing before we finish with Iran that I think is very relevant. I'm actually kind of blown away by the fact that this is happening simultaneously. It's almost too much. Darrell Kimball says today, defense secretary Heggseth testifies before House committee. This was on the 29. This is today. And his testimony reiterates Trump's threats to resume a nuclear explosive testing on an equal basis, whatever that means.

Starting point is 02:41:49 such talk is dangerous and illogical. A few thoughts on why, based on his column, and he lists them out. I'll just let you read those for yourselves. Here is what the Arms Control Association post. This was May of 2026. And this is the, this is his post. You can read this as well,

Starting point is 02:42:06 but it says although U.S. nuclear weapons labs have confirmed year after year that there is no technical or military reason for renewed U.S. nuclear test explosions, On October 30th, 2025, Trump threatened to resume nuclear testing on an equal basis. Since then, the White House and the NNSA have not been able or willing to clarify what kind of nuclear weapons test Trump is talking about. Tactical, I guarantee it. He's the one that spearheaded that entire change.

Starting point is 02:42:36 In fact, it says NNSA and U.S. Strategic Command have reaffirmed that there is no technical or military basis to restart nuclear explosive testing. That is from U.S. Strategic Command, meaning if they do this, there's no reason for it. There's no benefit for it. So why are they doing it? Why are they talking about doing it? Trump's, as he writes, impulsive directive to resume testing appears to be all about, surprise, surprise, political retribution. And his belief that some other nuclear armed state has conducted a nuclear test in violation

Starting point is 02:43:05 of the treaty that his administration does not support. I guess, meaning they did it so we get to do it? Or we have to show that we can to? I mean, that's the kind of childish mentality that I think he actually operates under. Renewed U.S. explosive testing at any yield would set off a chain reaction of nuclear testing worldwide that would improve the nuclear capabilities of U.S. adversaries and blow apart the global nonproliferation system, which, by the way, barely exists already. Like, as we can see.

Starting point is 02:43:38 China, allegedly conducting a nuclear test, that's what the evidence seems to show. Russia, none of them seem to. be actually rolling back their dad because as Trump has been doing his entire time and probably Biden without saying it out loud have been increasing have been leaning into tactical nukes and so they do too. And so now we come back to the point of them going around you can't do the thing that we're wildly experimenting with with no real guidelines and no real concern for human life. But you're a bad guy because you're not doing that and we want to pretend you are. I mean, think about doing this the same time. So we're at a point now where I argue this comes about

Starting point is 02:44:13 and maybe because of some secret, some other tangential plan this is meant to cover. I really don't know, but I just don't think it makes sense. And then Trump posts this. Iran can't get their act together. Yes, we're going to finish with laughing about how ridiculous this all is because this is embarrassing, guys. I mean, to another level, cringy, embarrassing,

Starting point is 02:44:36 not just this post, the whole thing they've been doing. He says they don't know how to sign a non-nuclear deal. Oh, was that what it is? you mean aside from the one they signed and the one they offered that you turned down and bombed them afterward and then you kept trying to get them to take the thing that they already took that you bombed them afterward and they said no and you feel stupid because I don't even know what your logic is but you just keep pretending they're begging for it all the way until this point and now you're just going you better do the thing they already offered I mean this can't get any more embarrassing for them

Starting point is 02:45:05 they better get smart soon oh you mean the group that you just told us have no cards the group that you told us don't know who's in charge. The group that you just literally told us called you and said, hey, we're in a state of collapse. Seriously? But yeah, you better or else will extend the ceasefire or else will not do the thing I promised to do. And I'm not even advocating for him to do that because that would mean death, destruction, and even more illegal war.

Starting point is 02:45:36 But you just have to acknowledge that he's not in a position of strength. or he's not in charge. And that's what you get, all substance, or all flash, no substance, right? I mean, that's what this is. This is the meme administration. Now, as I wrote in the last one part of the sentence, which by the way, I'm still mad about the way that comes out on there,

Starting point is 02:45:58 that's supposed to be a strike through, which it looks like everywhere else. So it looks like Trump's new ballroom crossed out, White House correspondent thinner shooting. Trump has lost in Iran. Today, it was that Iran called his bluff. And I think that's very clear that's happening right now. But I think this is the case, too.

Starting point is 02:46:13 Now, that's not to say that that was the, maybe you could argue that's not representative of the reality of our military power. You know, you could take it's however you want. The reality is for whatever justification, whatever agenda or lack thereof, they are not in a position of strength right now. That's how I read it anyway. You can come to your conclusions based on the evidence, which is why I always include everything we discuss down below after we're done. White House. Iran has just informed us that they are in. in a state of collapse.

Starting point is 02:46:43 Everybody made fun of this because it makes no sense whatsoever, especially the fact that they would call you and say that. Why? Why would they do that and then refuse to make a deal? Because they're not unsure who's in control. Well, that's why he says that to make you go. Okay, somebody else wants to make a deal. Okay, well, then why wouldn't you do?

Starting point is 02:46:59 I mean, anyway, I don't even, I'm not even going to give it any kind of credence today because it's objectively obvious these people are either being lied to or lying to you. us. They want us to open the Hormu straight as soon as possible as they try to figure out their leadership situation. He says, which I believe they'll be able to do, meaning that you act like you're still somehow in the process of some kind of endpoint. Now, whatever they end up getting to, whether Trump gives them everything, he'll end up claiming he won. Mark my words. There's even studies going on right now that decide what will, what Trump will do if, rather what Iran will do, excuse me, if Trump just goes, I won and backs away.

Starting point is 02:47:37 I'll show you in a second. But of course, here's what you get. This cartoon steps up and goes, Justin, red light. Trump says Iran is informed him that they're in a state of collapse. I just laughed at that. This person says,

Starting point is 02:47:49 I was under the impression. We already won, though. Didn't we obliterate their resources and destroy their civilization? Their gay leader was kidnapped and we completely destroyed their Navy? Huh? Here, two, four, unseed levels of gas lighting.

Starting point is 02:47:59 What a perfect way to frame that. God, it's just, it's embarrassing. And Jeremy Schaill says they aren't even trying to make the lies believe more. I don't think they ever were. And that, oops, that's the, oh look, the Dave Smith says, they swore before God, the nation to uphold the Constitution, and then they wiped their

Starting point is 02:48:18 ASS with it in front of all of us. I happen to agree. Look, look at you're going to build the ballroom. That, they're making fun of you guys. They're making fun of all of us. But that's what, that's Trump's post about state of collapse. Jeremy's laughing at him because it's stupid. It didn't happen. Simple as that. And State Department puts it out. Just the caption of his truth.

Starting point is 02:48:37 social. Glenn Greenwald says Iran spent nine weeks on its knees begging Trump to accept full surrender because they have no weapons, no ability to communicate, and are on the verge of collapse and apparently have no leaders. Somehow, they simultaneously have also, also have the straight-off moves closed and refused to give Trump what he demands. You just can't not laugh at that. It's stupid. Now, Germany's murder says Iran is humiliating U.S., which really upset Donald Trump. He did. He called him out publicly. And Trump just, he, you know, did his usual thing of calling him silly names and acting like a child. And, you know, doing whatever he does about, I think what he said was he wants them to have a nuclear bomb or whatever dump that. Why would you say that? Or the idea that Iran, he doesn't understand that Iran can't have it. Well, they offered to give it up and you bomb them anyway. And they aren't seeking it anyway. The same old tired lies. U.S. War and Iran has cost $25 billion just so far. You know, the three-day war that's turned into two months that's Thomas would be nothing with smaller government, less spending, you know, the same old rigamarole. Frankly, guys, whether this was the plan or absolute shocking levels of incompetence,

Starting point is 02:49:50 it's either way, your government's playing you or another government is playing you, I guess, but this is going to keep going up. They're asking for more money. It's the same thing as everywhere else. Trump is dissatisfied with Iran's plan to reopen the straight-up for moves. This came out today, or actually late yesterday. So this is after the point, right? So now we have the reality where Iran is standing its ground.

Starting point is 02:50:14 Trump wants you to believe that they said we're in a state of collapse. Now this is what Iran is basically, here they make this as simple as possible here because it gets so muddled with all the lies from the Trump administration. The reality of this appears to me to be that Iran is, like I said, still maintaining the stance they had. We demand those 10 points. and unless you want to talk about that, we don't care.

Starting point is 02:50:38 We will last this out forever, which is at least what they're saying, and even the U.S. experts are beginning to understand that's the reality. So when he says, we're unhappy with your plan, that's not, that he's trying to make it sound like there's a back and forth going on. As far as I understand it, you have Pakistan, who is still relaying messages, but Iran is standing with that one point. And the only reason they met last time is because they were promising to give them that and then lied about it.

Starting point is 02:51:02 Now, this last time we had some kind of alleged meeting, and it'll say it right here in the article, well, essentially what happened was Donald Trump's administration went. They were there, and they told Pakistan that they have no intention of meeting Whitkoff and Kushter, and they left. And then Trump pretended like he never went, because that's how spectacularly embarrassing that is for them, and how childish it is that they can't just, I mean, if you're in a position, why wouldn't you go, they chose not to meet, which shows they don't want peace. That's what I would have said if I was a propagandist, but instead, you're so insecure that you have to go,

Starting point is 02:51:37 we're not even going to go, quickly, fly back. You know, it's like, just, it's painful. President Trump has told advisors he's not satisfied with Iran's latest proposal. See, there's no later, it's the same. Now, what you understand within this is you could argue there's a, like a, I'm, my, it's, based on my, it's my opinion regardless. But what I was going to say there is that ultimately, you could see this in a way where Iran would be saying, like step by step.

Starting point is 02:52:03 Like let's get this part done first to open the straight. But I think what we can clearly tell, and again, based off reporting from people like Jeremy Scahill and people, even from Miranda, you know, tied directly to the government.

Starting point is 02:52:14 And of course, we could be lied to. It appears to me that they still have maintained that 10 point reality. And so when he says they're not satisfied with the latest proposal, it's just a way to act

Starting point is 02:52:24 like there's some kind of ongoing negotiation. Like I said, though, you could argue, it's just Ron actually going. Look, let's do the straight part. And then I'm going, no, no, no, that could be real. But either way, it's the same outcome.

Starting point is 02:52:38 Not satisfied with their latest proposal to reopen the strait and end the war, which is what Trump said he was trying to accomplish, according to multiple people brief in discussions with the White House. But when it says to reopen the straight, what does that show you? Right? It's funny how it's completely turned around, which is what it always really was, to the U.S. government keeping the straight closed. But yet your whole point is about reopening the street.

Starting point is 02:53:01 So if you're the only one keeping it blocked, what's the conversation here? Well, you see, it's because they can't back away allowing Iran to look like they won. And on top of that, Iran has now positioned itself in a very secure, both legally sound and strategically sound position to run tolls through the straight and to manage passage through it. And anybody who doesn't go along the routes they've dictated and acknowledge the toll like every other straight in the world, then they, and the framing of this is them just attacking every shift. It's not what's happening as far as I can tell. If anybody tries to force past, then yes.

Starting point is 02:53:40 But what I can see is there are people who are simply being taken in a dock because they're not listening. Now, my point in saying all that is the idea of the street being closed seems to be the U.S.'s decision to make it stay that way until they get what they want, which was the point from day one, guys. They did not shut the straight down. There weren't mines in the straight as far as I can tell. They simply said, you guys can't come through.

Starting point is 02:53:59 and then because of insurance manipulation, threats from the Israel government, U.S. they literally created the illusion that this was shut down. And that was because they wanted the world to turn against Iran and they're failing. Many parts of that is my opinion. I've made that clear over the weeks covering this so far. The proposal also called on the United States to end its naval blockade but would have set aside questions about what to do with the nuclear program. According to the U.S. and Iranian officials familiar with the details. Now, my point there is still completely aligned with the,

Starting point is 02:54:29 the 10-point plan because that's not on the table. But so what happens is the U.S. is going, well, no, you need to get rid of your nuclear program. Well, guess what? As I'll show you again, we play the clip this time, they already offered that and they bombed them on the night of the 28th because they offered that. And before that, under the JCPOA, they already met that too, or rather at least keeping it under, you know, down under 4%. This latest deal before before they bombed them on the 28th was to give up the enrichment and to give up the program. They'd never offered that before. So for him to say that now, either means he's out of the loop or knows they'll not agree.

Starting point is 02:55:03 But it was Israel that didn't want that to happen, in my opinion, because that's their justification to take over Iran, the lie, that is, about them having a nuclear weapon. Which none of the evidence backs up, not from Tulsi Gabbard's DNI position, not from the previous administration, not from the international atomic energy agency, not from anybody else other than Israel and the United States continuing to say that without the evidence matters. Iran has repeatedly rejected American proposals to suspend its nuclear program and hand over a stockpile of highly. See, this is one of my points from earlier. This is the New York Times, who I guarantee you has the ability to do their due diligence on the basic realities of why that's not true. Iran is repeatedly rejected. Now, you could argue that's since the 28th, but you see how deceptive that is? Historically is how you would read that. Iran has repeatedly told you, one, they're not doing illegal nuclear weapons. weapons programs, or rather just nuclear weapons programs, and two, that they already have offered to suspend it or give it up entirely on the 28th and hand, and even then also hand over their stockpile. So to say it like that, knowing they did that on the 28th, which was upheld by the foreign minister of Amman who was in the meeting, and then publicly discussed this on face the nation, I'll play for you, and they were bombed that night. My point is, they know what they're doing

Starting point is 02:56:25 right there. They're trying to make it sound like Iran refused to give up their nuclear program because that helps the agenda. Trump's agenda, guys, this is New York Times because that's the point. When it comes to war in Israel, it's always in the same position. It is not clear precisely why Mr. Trump is not satisfied with the proposal, especially since I'll add his point was about reopening the straight. But he has repeatedly insisted that Iran cannot have nuclear weapons. Okay, they still don't. They still don't seem to want them. And so you're literally using this straw man false narrative to keep the straight closed. Now, whether Trump knows they don't have it or not,

Starting point is 02:57:02 the point is at some level they do know they don't have it, and they're keeping it closed anyway. A U.S. official also said that accepting it could appear to deny Trump a victory. I actually think it's a huge part of this, at least in Trump's calculus. Mr. Trump reviewed the proposal with advisors on Monday after Iran's foreign minister, Aragachi, delivered it to Pakistan on Sunday. So if we understand it, it's the same 10-point plans, and I argue what he probably delivered was simply like, let's open the straight.

Starting point is 02:57:28 That's part of our 10-point demands. We can do that if you agree to our demands about the straight. Like, see how that makes sense? Now it says, Mr. Trump rejected another proposal from Iran last week, and they write and called off around a peace talks over the weekend. See my point? Like, this is New York Times literally citing with what Trump said happened, even though we can prove that's not what actually happened.

Starting point is 02:57:52 The New York Times. the one that Trump and is they're calling out because they hate us and the New York Times lies about everything and then they gaslight for the agenda that helps Israel and the war. Or I guess they could just be that bad at this, but my point is they've got resources. They've got, they could find that out. And it says we were here. Yeah, and the point was, remember rejecting another proposal from Iran, all that happened right there was they've refused to meet them.

Starting point is 02:58:22 That's what happened. U.S. officials say Iran's leadership has not authorized its negotiators to make concessions on the nuclear deal. And you see, the way that's supposed to be framed is somehow like they don't have the power to do it. The point is that they've told you we will not make that concession anymore. That's the reason. And they frame it dishonestly. Manipulatively, rather. It says frustrating in attempts to forge a compromise or peace agreement, making it sound like Iran is refusing to budge.

Starting point is 02:58:49 And this is not taking aside. This is just simply not correct. And it says, quote, Iran is having a very hard time, Trump writes, figuring out who their leader is. Not true. Very clearly, Comini, the son, like it was right after this happened. They just keep pretending that's not true, I guess. They just don't know, Mr. Trump wrote. The infighting is between the hardliners who have been losing badly on the battlefield.

Starting point is 02:59:14 And like moderates who are not very moderate at all, I don't even know what that means. Right. So it's the infighting between the hardliners and the moderates who aren't moderates who aren't moderate. So then hardliners. So their hardliners fighting. The guy just can't even make his own point without undermining. He's like, well, we want to make sure they all think they're still crazy, right? So I have to undermine my own point to make sure you think they're all terrorists, but then that undermines the point you're making with the post. Seems pretty stupid. But overall, you're lying about pretty much every part of this. The U.S. Blockade has sought to cut off Iran's ability to export

Starting point is 02:59:45 its oil. But Iran, they write, threatens to attack ships that fail to pay a toll, have drastically reduce the traffic. That's not what happened in any sense. Traffic has been reduced because they're lying about what's happening and threatening. Oh, sorry about that. Oh, man. Okay, I did do this too. Good. I bumped that with my hands somehow.

Starting point is 03:00:08 That was wild. And I can't, you know, it won't even straighten out. That's weird. Oh, well, well, here we are. Why do this? There we go. They say Iran's leadership is unauthorized, frustrating in attempts to make a compromise.

Starting point is 03:00:26 Here we are. The blockade is sought to cut off their ability to export oil, but Iran threats to attack the ships to fail to pay, now back to the point. again, the reality being that they are simply saying you have to pay this toll. It'd be like a ship trying to pass through the Suez Canal and not doing what you're supposed to do. Well, they would stop them. They would maybe whatever the process is, crime, I don't know, ticket or pull them to the side and demand they do.

Starting point is 03:00:49 And so when Iran does it, terrorism, because that's the way this game is played. And on top of that, threatening to attack them, it's not, oh, the second point was reducing oil traffic. Well, guys, that's not what's doing that. As they said from the very beginning, no, we're not stopping anybody other than those attacking us, which would have an effect to some degree, but it was the weird pressure and the lies that stopped almost all of it from going through. Not the fact that they're saying, come through, you just to pay a toll like everywhere else. Iranian officials have insisted that any deal to open the straits should allow them to

Starting point is 03:01:22 continue to impose attacks or fee on ships that transit it. Normal. Historically, the United States has opposed any such restrictions on freedom of navigation. international waterways or straits. But the Trump administration has sent mixed message. This is the New York Times. Right. Just in case you don't know,

Starting point is 03:01:42 here's Robert Barnes, a lawyer. It's also just obviously provable. This person says, isn't the Strait of Form moves international waters? And he goes, no, it's territorial waters shared by Oman and Iran. And I guess I can show you again. It's not hard to demonstrate.

Starting point is 03:01:58 Oh, here, I can just do this, actually. Use the map here. And why this is important, guys, is because it completely changes their argument. So let's go to, I think it was just one of the ships and then it shows up. Okay. So as always, I mean, look at all those tankers, by the way. That changes every day. It's not like, I mean, they're on one side right now, but that's because there's a controlled passage.

Starting point is 03:02:26 But here we go, watch. And the reality is, depending on who they are, most of these are allowed to go through. As Ron's been telling you, and as you can prove are happening. Right here. you see that line okay so what's happening here is everything on this side of that line is considered Iranian territorial waters like it is with any country on the other side of that line is Omanian territorial waters okay anything of between is considered international waters it's all based on a certain mileage around every territory okay so what you notice here is those lines touch there is no international waters through that straight in that choke point that's the whole point and yet But nonetheless, Iran has not until they were illegally bombed with this for whatever, the million time. But in this engagement, they were illegally attacked.

Starting point is 03:03:15 And because of that, this is when they finally did this. That's it. So right there, you are legally allowed to do so. These are territorial waters. And they are talking with Oman. They are talking with their neighbors. They are talking with the United Nations. But yeah, make it out to be some terrorist move because you're failing in your war.

Starting point is 03:03:34 So back to the point about the. New York Times somehow not being able to understand that or doing its job when it needs to and lying for the agenda. You could decide it's ridiculous. They wouldn't be able to figure that out, right? Make fun of them for that. Comment. Be like, you guys ridiculous. It's obvious.

Starting point is 03:03:52 I can prove here's the picture. They don't care. Read again. Historically, the United States opposed any set restrictions on freedom of navigation, international waterways. Well, yes, they have, even though they don't care about that, even though they do that when they want to. you can argue that just means in a general sense anywhere else, not meaning that's happening here, even though that's what the whole point implies,

Starting point is 03:04:10 but the Trump administration has sent mixed messages. It says some administration officials believe that continuing the blockade for two more months would cause significant long-term damage to Tehran's energy industry. You know, aside for the fact that you can quite literally prove that they're absolutely getting tankers through. I guess we just don't talk about that. I mean, this is from the 22nd,

Starting point is 03:04:33 but guys, it's not a secret. I mean, you could look at tanker trackers, you could look at oil trackers.com. They're showing you that Iran, whether through their own manipulation or because Trump is lying for some reason, in this case, it was 34 Iran tankers slip past the U. for a billion dollars in oil. So this whole game they're playing where they're said, oh, they're drowning in their own failures. I do not see that. But others in the administration have said the assessment is flawed, probably based on the

Starting point is 03:05:01 experts from the State Department that don't know anything about Iran, and says, noting that Iran's positions have hardened and that the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps has only solidified its hold in power. See, same thing. What are you talking about? You mean the military that's already part of the, so the same people in power have solidified their control over their own power? It's just a way to make it sound like somehow the Revolutionary Guard have like taken control of the government and it's now they can't. They're trying to make it sound like because of what they're doing that they've made the bad terrorist more powerful. This is what they do. And it just doesn't.

Starting point is 03:05:34 need you to understand it. This is what even the adversarial media will do when they need to and supporting Trump's agenda. Without a resumption of military action, there is little reason to think the Iranian position will shift. Yes. Why would they? Even if bombing resumed, there is little evidence that would alter Iran's decision-making process. I agree. Some administration officials have been skeptical that Iran is ready to make concessions and say making a deal is open to open the straight is the best way forward. Well, yeah, except. that seems that that's what the U.S. government and Israel do not want to happen because then, well, for different reasons, I argue, then they would lose their momentum, Israel. Trump would look

Starting point is 03:06:14 like he lost because he did. And he apparently is not capable of allowing that. 34 tankers. Okay, let's watch this clip again. I think this is important because this is something that needs to be reiterated and heard because it's so obvious that this, so, and you can go back to the JCPOA, you can go back to the points before this, where the Iran upheld this part of the deal, but below 4% in Richmond until Trump pulled out and then what they did was legally allowed. It's very easy to prove. But on the 28th before this all started that night, they agreed to give up their stockpile entirely and their entire program, which they've never done before.

Starting point is 03:06:53 That's why Israel bombed them. And whether Trump knows it or not, he was tricked or dragged into this or not able to say no. Here's what he said on Face the Nation. And joining me now is the foreign minister of Oman, Father Al-Aul-A. Bousaidi, who is the mediator, negotiating a nuclear deal between the United States and Iran. Welcome to Face the Nation. Thank you. So President Trump said Friday he's not happy with the way talks are going and not happy

Starting point is 03:07:24 that they're not willing to give us what we have to have. From your point of view, is diplomacy failing? I am confident and in my assessment of the way the talks are going, I think there is really, I can see that the peace deal is within our reach. Now, so funny, he didn't respond to that right away, right? So what she just said was Trump's going, they won't give us what we want, which he's arguing is giving up nuclear program. But that's literally what they offered.

Starting point is 03:07:58 So even as it was on the table that they were offering what Trump demands, he was saying they won't give us that. Right? And so right there, either Trump was being lied to by Israel or Whitcomb. often Kushner combined or he was lying to you because we know this was the case. It's verified many times over at this point. And so I think it's worth considering. Was he lying or was he being lied to?

Starting point is 03:08:24 A peace deal. Yes, it is within our reach. If we just allow diplomacy the space it needs to get there. Because I don't think any alternative to diplomacy is going to solve this problem. When you say space, does that mean you are asking for more time to continue negotiations? I'm asking to continue this process because we have already achieved quite a substantial progress in the direction of a deal. And the heart of this deal is very important, and I think we have captured that heart. When you say the heart of the deal, Iran has said this has to be nuclear.

Starting point is 03:09:08 only. What have you actually agreed upon? Can you give us any sense of why there should be more time? Because if the ultimate objective is to ensure forever that Iran cannot have a nuclear bomb, I think we have cracked that problem through these negotiations by agreeing a very important breakthrough that has never been achieved any time before. And I think if we can capture that and build on it, I think a deal is within our reach. Right. That's what he's saying is on the 28th, right? They had, Iran had put forward, we will give up.

Starting point is 03:09:58 And I honestly think they were probably calling their bluff, which we've, like we saw, Hamas do with Israel numerous times. They said, we'll give up our nuclear program. That's what he'll say. And we can just read the article as well and our enrichment. And that's what he's saying. If we can just go further with this, Trump's out there going, they won't do the thing and we're going to bomb them if they don't, even as they do this.

Starting point is 03:10:23 Then we can see this. We can see it through. They bombed them that night. What has Iran agreed to you that they have never done before? Can you give us any sense? The single most important. achievement, I believe, is the agreement that Iran will never ever have a nuclear material that will create a womb. This is, I think, a big achievement.

Starting point is 03:10:59 This is something that is not in the old deal that was negotiated during. President Obama's time. This is something completely new. It really makes the enrichment argument less relevant because now we are talking about zero stockpiling. And that is very, very important. Because if you cannot stockpile material that is enriched, then there is no way you can actually create a bomb.

Starting point is 03:11:32 Whether you are rich. For those in the chat, this is the Foreign Minister of Oman, who was inside the negotiations with Iran, and the U.S. and Israel and is testifying to what they said on the 28th, which is that they would give up. They would give them everything that they asked for, and they bombed them that night instead of taking it. Or don't der Ridge.

Starting point is 03:11:50 And I think this is really something that has been missed a lot by the media, and I want to clarify that from the standpoint of a mediator. Right. And this is where I made fun of her. And it gets, I can't even deal. Like, he talks slow and this is, you know, it's just, It kills me to watch this because what she goes on to do like a thousand times in a row is like, you know, he's basically saying they agreed to give it all up. And she's like, so they'll make small bombs. He's like, no, they agreed to give it up entirely. So they'll make them in another country. You know, like, I'm making it up. But that's basically what she keeps doing and it's infuriating. And also pretty clearly because Iran bad guy, right? And we know that. But the point is obvious. Explain that. So the enriched material, the things that could be used as nuclear fuel for a bomb. You're saying Iran would not keep on their own soil?

Starting point is 03:12:43 They would give it up. Like right there. Like, you know, he said give it up. You said it very clearly. Well, they'd keep it somewhere else. No, man. Like, it just, you know, it just gets enthiresome. But anyway, the point is clear, I think.

Starting point is 03:12:54 And this is all included and you could, it's undeniable, guys. I mean, this is, this was the point that this, you know, again, you could always argue that Ron's lying, but that's my point. That's not what they were saying. They weren't coming out saying, well, they agreed, but I don't believe them. They came out and said, they came out and. said, Rubio Trump, they refused to give up a nuclear bomb. It's just not what happened. I think that's so incredibly important that they chose to do this right after they finally

Starting point is 03:13:17 agreed to it when peace was actually within reach because it shows you they don't really want this, guys. Now, again, I'll include this. It's just important to understand the reality of how even the thing they claim, the information when Whitkoff came out and lied about 60% in Richmond that was within their safeguard agreement. And even then White House put out this guy speaking with 60 minutes. You made the same claim about instead of 465 kilograms, nearly a thousand pounds. Same point. That's what it amounts to of 60% of Richmond. Nope. He's just simply pointing to what the director general of the International Atomic Energy Agency already clearly stated was within safeguards. 60%. I've shown you that many times. I'll include this for those that need to see it because the

Starting point is 03:13:59 reality is this is important. Here's they're lying to you. And it just shows you they know they're lying to you, guys. So on that point, here's Hegg Seth. As they're over there still trying to stress its nuclear, who admits yet again that there was no eminent threat of a nuclear breakout, which we know based on the evidence. But here they're getting trapped by their own lies. Here he is in front of Congress. Well, bent on getting a nuclear weapon and get them to a point where they're at the table giving it up in a way that. So they haven't ever have it. So they haven't broken yet.

Starting point is 03:14:32 Okay, we haven't gotten there yet for all of the legal. Well, their nuclear facilities have been obliterated. ground, they're buried and we're watching them 24-7. So we know where any nuclear material would be. Reclaiming my time for a quick second here. We had to start this war, you just said, 60 days ago, because the nuclear weapon was an imminent threat. Right. Now you're saying that it was completely obliterated. They had not given up their nuclear ambitions and they had a con- So it wasn't eminent by every definition of the word and on top of that he's also lying about the nuclear ambitions. That's how pathetic this is.

Starting point is 03:15:07 shield of thousands of operation midnight hammered nothing of substance it left us in exactly the same place we were before so much so their facilities are bombed and obliterated their their ambitions continued and guess what you can prove their enrichment facility was bombed which means which is the most hilarious part of all this is that even if they did have those ambitions they could literally they would not be able to do it let alone should they even make the thing they claim, have time and resources and material would make to actually turn it into a bomb. And if they were even able to do that, which would take a lot longer than they pretend it would. Now, I'm talking about going from 60 to 90, which would take its own time, but going from

Starting point is 03:15:49 taking 90% of rich material, turning it into what it needs to make the bomb, then making that into the bomb with materials and research and energy and time it takes, then having that gigantic thing, which is what it would be, and somehow finding a way to make use of that. Scott Horton blew them out of the water on Pierce Morgan with that. And it's unbelievably obvious. and yet we're lied and gassed by all of these people pretending to be experts who or or who are and are knowingly lying to you. This guy doesn't, he's none of those things.

Starting point is 03:16:15 This is a guy who's repeating what he's told in my opinion, you know, who is not even very popular on Fox News. That's what his, his testament to authority is at this point. Trump said so. At the weakest moment, nothing of substance. It left us at exactly the same place we were before. So much so. Their facilities were bombed and obliterated.

Starting point is 03:16:34 their ambitions continued and they're building a conventional shield let me try again it's the north korea strategy you know this very well the north korea strategy was use conventional missiles to prevent anybody from challenging them so they could yeah yeah so have a defense to stop belligerent people from doing bad things to you because you have a defense or i guess you can invert that and say terrorists that have missiles and stop us from stopping them from doing the things they want to do i'm sure you could piece out which one is possible here or you know i guess either are possible with the idea rather you I'm sure you could piece out that both of those things to be the case and if you're talking about a government who's doing all of those things or all of their

Starting point is 03:17:10 allies are doing all of those things and ask yourself why is it bad for every it's not it's not illegal it's not a crime it's simply what everybody else does and it's only bad because they bad guy even though you can literally go through all the evidence they used to claim their bad guy and realize they make up almost all of it because it's and you have to realize at one point this wasn't as as cartoonish as it is today it was always dishonest But the people at one point were at least competent. They had, you know, they could speak without looking like morons. They could actually hold multiple thoughts at one time.

Starting point is 03:17:40 And they lied to you more effectively. Today, because of whatever reason, we've been diminishing, they have been diminishing to this embarrassing display. And they can't even hold two lies together at once. And that's what's actually happening, I think. Slow walk their way to a weapon. President Trump saw Iran at its weakest moment, took an action to ensure in a way that only the United States of America could do.

Starting point is 03:18:01 Nope, not even close. What they did, most other countries could do. And I mean, that's realistically. If you're talking about some kind of next generation weaponry, well, that's something different. But being able to bomb a country the way you did is pretty much what every country can do. But whatever, you know, U.S. is the best. At its weakest moment, took an action to ensure in a way that only the United States of America could do with our Israeli partners.

Starting point is 03:18:25 And yet to ensure their actual shield was brought to the deal with we've done. If I could get to do it. So on you. Like as he was saying, it's like, oh, wait. they're going to get mad if I don't think. They need to make sure they know that I know they were actually control. They're Israel too. They can do like no other than the U.S.

Starting point is 03:18:41 Oh, and Israel. Well, wait a minute. That changes the point, though, doesn't it? Overall, you can't argue it's eminent. Well, by the way, the real point over everything, because there's many points we made about how ridiculous it all is. But guys, you can't have the justification. You can't have the justification for this,

Starting point is 03:18:57 be that it's an eminent threat, which is what they argued. And then by your own testimony, make it clear that by every, every definition of the word, it was not eminent. But just go, but come on, you get it. We knew they were bad. We had an opportunity. So just go along with it. That's what he's doing.

Starting point is 03:19:11 And probably it's going to work. That's the real point, because our government are on the same side. They'll give you these grandstanding moments. And hey, Seth, and you're wrong. Whoa, whoa, whoa, what you just say? And then everybody walks out and goes home and gets a beer. And they laugh at how you think something's going to happen. I hate to be so pessimistic guys, but are every moment in this government,

Starting point is 03:19:31 in this life controlled by this government, demonstrates that that's what they do. And look, my whole point of doing this is not to just go, man, this is bad, but to fight to change it. That's the whole point. As he simply says, he admits the same thing. Thus, there was no justification for this war under any circumstances. The very weak attempt the secretary makes to try and explain away his admission is not

Starting point is 03:19:55 credible because one cannot simultaneously argue there was an imminent threat and also hold that all nuclear material is still buried under a mountain somewhere. stupid. Now, after that, this is, because of the time, the time difference in the world, it was posted April 30th, but it was basically just later in the day, April 29th for us. U.S. preparing for short and powerful wave of strikes. I guess that's where we are now. As Iran, peace talk stall, right? So how many times can the threat of possible action keeps, you know, we're going to do the, like you've never seen if you don't do the one thing I'm asking and then they don't do it. They don't know who's in charge. We'll give them a few more days.

Starting point is 03:20:33 better do the thing and we're going to do the thing and then okay well they don't even they're a state of collapse okay so why wouldn't you just take advantage i sure i don't even need to waste time on this like really don't even understand how anybody anywhere other than people who choose to for other reasons can pretend that we don't know what's happening now i shouldn't say it like that because pretend that we don't know they're lying to us u.s president don't trump has reportedly revealed that he will keep iran under a naval blockade great so trump is a said we're keeping the blockade until they agree to a peace deal now i doubt that happens. I think they're going to fold at some point if what appears to be the case is the case. But this is him going, you better, or we're going to go on forever. I guess in hopes that they go,

Starting point is 03:21:11 oh, well, then we better stop because we can't do this forever, even though they already think clearly they can. And even though you just said you were going to bomb them in war and everything else, but now it's like, well, we're just going to keep the blockade going. Trump is rejecting an Iranian proposal to open the straight where the U.S. is maintained a blockade. Funny how things have flipped around, right? Iran's going, let's open this. Let's get it going. Trump's like, no, not until you give us what we want. So now you're extorting the global energy process. Trump is the one holding the world hostage because of Iran. He wants something from Iran. Doesn't that sound familiar to every other thing? They won't let the TSA open. Well, wait a minute. When you stand back and look, you're the one

Starting point is 03:21:48 keeping that stop because they won't give you the same act. Seems to be what he does. And at what point, do adults step in and go, yeah, come on, Trump, that's stupid. We know you're the one doing it. You're the one holding it down. Stop pretending like everybody else is doing that. is familiar with the matter told Axios that U.S. Central Command has prepared a plan for a short and powerful wave of strikes on Iran to break the deadlock. Why would that break the deadlock? So some more illegal bombings and some more civilian deaths are going to break the deadlock that they are clearly committed to maintaining. That's illusory. Guys, there's no way anybody actually thinks that's going to change anything. And they also said they'd strike infrastructure. Yeah, so we're publicly telling you we're going to violate the law. We're going to murder civilians and you better stop, but we're going to, you better stop being a terrorist or we're going to do all the things that you do as terrorists that you actually don't do? On Tuesday, Trump posted an image on true social featuring himself holding a gun with the word, no more Mr. Nice Guy, right, after 40 times of making the same threat. On the other side, and Iranian security source reportedly said that the U.S. Navy blockade will

Starting point is 03:22:51 will be met with practical and unprecedented action. The source said that the Iranian forces have shown restraint, which they clearly have, to give a chance to diplomacy, but warned the punishing response if the block. Lockgate continues. And they would have a legal right to respond to these things. Guys, this is an act of war. It's just so, you know, I guess I don't understand where from a strategic perspective that why they, I mean, this is why they keep doing it. And this is why I go to the point of where I think Israel is dictating every move here. Because this is so obviously counter to even Trump's personal agenda. I mean, like I keep saying, you could, if you're going to lie about it all, which they're doing,

Starting point is 03:23:30 you could absolutely fabricate a much more effective lie. But the lie seems to be in the interest of what they originally wanted to be the case. The blockade, the maintenance of the energy manipulation, and that's clearly what's driving this bus. Now, U.S. spy agencies examine how Iran would react to Trump declaring victory. Now, for time in general, I think I'll just, we won't read this all, but the simple point was what we were talking about. I mean, it's actually pretty funny that they make this whole article, and it's very simple. it basically says if Trump were declared victory in the U.S. would drew down his forces, Iran would likely be with it as a win.

Starting point is 03:24:05 Well, yeah, duh. You know what I mean? Like, yeah, because they clearly are in the strength. I mean, that's just a funny, like it's like some see breakdown from the experts. And it says if Trump instead said the U.S. had won but maintained troop presence, Iran would see this as negotiating tactic and keep going. Like they've done every other time he's lied about it. Great breakdown, Reuters, but if there's more to it,

Starting point is 03:24:25 but the simple point is the U.S. spy agencies are the ones doing this. they're looking at well what because this is where it seems to be going. Trump's going to go, we did it, which he's already kind of floated. It's not going to work. But at least it gets it out of this momentary issue, even though nobody believes him. And it's still embarrassing. He can at least pretend that everybody believes him. And all the same talking heads on Twitter will be like, we all love you and we all agree.

Starting point is 03:24:46 And he might even think that's the truth. Okay. So to finish, a couple points about the Hort Strait of Hormuz, as we said, obviously it is not international waters. All the lies they keep spinning and all the fake pseudo intellectuals out there who may even think they're right telling you otherwise. In general, this account's pointing out U.S. farm bankruptcy surge. Talked about the farm bill earlier. There's all these different, you know, kind of larger ties to the supply chain issue

Starting point is 03:25:15 that went right back to the COVID point. As fertilizer costs, squeeze farmers, everybody's talking about this coming. The American Farm Bureau reported that 315 Chapter 12 bankruptcy files from 2025 up from 216 in 2024 and the third consecutive annual increase. The Midwest got hit hardest with 121 filings, a 70% jump. Basically, farmers are going bankrupt. But guess what? That works perfect for the big industries, just like it worked perfect during COVID

Starting point is 03:25:43 to push out all the small businesses and dump it all to the hands of the big guys. You think this is different? It's not. This is still the great reset. Iran mission to UN, New York. Iran is not partied to the 1982 UN Convention on the Law of the Sea. I didn't know that, which is interesting. Therefore, it is not bound by the treaty-based provisions.

Starting point is 03:26:00 Now, that's interesting to think about. Because you can't argue that they're bound by what you've agreed to somewhere else. But it's different. That's a specific point because they are still engaged with the UN. But what's interesting, though, is that just there's, you know, think about that in the context of other things the U.S. and others aren't signed to. It's interesting thought. As the main coastal state within those territorial sea at the Strait of Ramoose lies, Iran has the legitimate and legal right to take necessary and proportionate measures to address emerging security threats. Very terroristic of them, right?

Starting point is 03:26:29 It's exactly what any government would say with what's dealing with, if they, if they, they're being attacked illegally in their own waters, ensure safety navigation and prevent the misuse of the Strait of Hormuzes for hostile or military purposes. Any disruption to maritime transport in the Strait of Hormuz and its consequences lie with the U.S. whose unlawful actions and danger in national navigation. Lasting stability and security in Persian Gulf

Starting point is 03:26:50 and the wider region can only be achieved through a durable and permanent secession of aggression against Iran, supplemented by credible guarantees of non-recurrence. It's just funny. And they're talking about through the United States. I just imagine. What does the other side do with you? They're Hamas.

Starting point is 03:27:07 They don't, we don't believe in that. We'll threaten their families. Pretty clear who is playing the role here. Treasury Department. So this is how they're framing the strength, saying they, the Treasury's office of Ford Assets Control has designated 35 entities and individuals that oversee Iran's shadow banking architecture, you know, like BlackRock, which is a massive shadow bank,

Starting point is 03:27:30 tied directly to Donald Trump. And by the way, what they're really just talking about is their economy, their oil industry. And it says to facilitate the movement of equivalent of tens of billions of dollars, you know, the only reason this is being done around what you can see is because you guys are sanctioning them, because you're blocking everything they do in the surface. You're making it, you're forcing things to go behind the scenes and acting like that proves they're doing something wrong. It could, but it's also very clearly because you're trying to stop it if they do it publicly, which is why.

Starting point is 03:28:00 I mean, obviously because you're trying to control the flow. their oil sales are not criminals, or not criminal acts. These networks allow Iran's armed forces, including the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, to access the international financial system to receive payment for illicit oil sales. So what you're saying is this is their economic system that allows their military to be paid by their sale of oil. Funny how normal that sounds when you cut out all the terrorist, illicit and crazy stuff, that you're creating based on your illegal actions. Purchase sensitive components for missiles and weapons.

Starting point is 03:28:31 so defense and transfer money to its terrorist proxies, so have money to use for their military purposes. And if you want to argue they're funding Hamas or Hezbollah or the Houthis, that they then support their allies like you do everywhere else. It's very easy to understand how simple that is and the way that they turn this into. I mean, anyway, it's just, it's people will make it out to be whatever they want to make it out to be. If you don't understand how basic this is, your loss of the two-party illusion. You're choosing to side with the government, a government who has lied to you,

Starting point is 03:29:01 manipulated you and stole from you and poisoned you your entire life. But sure, I'm the one that it's missing, losing sight. China authorizes asset seizures after U.S. blocks Iranian oil. Now, this is interesting. I'll follow up on this. I'm yet to see this take effect. Maybe it's happening right now. But China is essentially saying, just simply put, this just quickly put,

Starting point is 03:29:28 it says a source close to Ghalibov and Iran says the direct response to the U.S. seizing Iranian oil shipments bound for China, the Chinese government has issued new regulations, allowing confiscation of assets belonging to any foreign government or company that disrupts their chain. It's a big deal, right? So what China is saying is that if you seize an Iranian ship, even like, I guess in this case that has Chinese oil,

Starting point is 03:29:51 we are authorizing the seizing of your ships everywhere. It's a big, it's a really big deal. And this is where this is going to keep going, if Trump does not stop this whole thing. And they're not, I mean, whether China has the legal right to do that, I would argue they don't, it's stemming from what they're doing, which is illegal. Call out both if they're both illegal. The point would be, as the same I would say in the other context,

Starting point is 03:30:13 it doesn't make it right to do the same wrong thing back, right? So China would be just as illegal in doing that. This is what the Trump administration is creating. Iran's rile currency hits record low. This is Associated Press. as shaky ceasefire with the U.S. and Israel holds. This is how, like, it's, you need, just like the lockstep part of the COVID situation, you need to recognize where this all, the way that they pulled together.

Starting point is 03:30:43 New York Times, Associated Press, like the ceasefire, are you actually pretending that while they bomb Lebanon, while they bomb Tehran, while they seize ships and maintaining legal blockade, all of which individually, respectively, are violations of the ceasefire? that have not just been a one-off and they pulled it away, but have maintained it. The blockade never stopped. They're still seizing ships. They're still bombing Lebanon.

Starting point is 03:31:05 They're not a holding of the ceasefire does not exist. It didn't exist the moment the blockade maintained. That's what Iran said. That's why they haven't been meeting. You kept the blockade, which was an explicit violation. And I said that in the show before the next day. I said, that looks like that's going to violate it. They said, we're done.

Starting point is 03:31:25 There's no ceasefire. It exists. You don't have a deal if you're, violating the ceasefire. And yet it holds. It's like it's like the reports you get about the, you know, after 700 deaths in Lebanon, the ceasefire maintains. It's like, what are you talking about? And I said even as cities are bombed, ships are seized, illegal ceasefire, violating blockades remain, there's something else. It's just incredible. And as Rand Grimm points out, Trump on the 23rd of April, we've extended the ceasefire between Israel and Lebanon by three weeks,

Starting point is 03:31:55 Israeli Air Force, in the 27th. We've begun. to attack infrastructure and the terrorist organization Hezbollah. Oh, so we're bombing civilian infrastructure in the Lebanese territories that we want to fight. Just like they do everywhere else. Yep. Now, even if you disagree with my framing of the second part, aren't they on a ceasefire? Didn't Trump say he'd reign in Israel? Come on.

Starting point is 03:32:14 And as anybody with a brain told you, like I said at the time, that's not going to happen. Israel's going to do what it wants. And Trump is not going to do anything about it. And here we are. Ryan McCullick, Dropside News points out, Secretary of State Marco Rubio stated on 27th, the U.S. is working to establish vetted units within the Lebanese armed forces to disarm and dismantle Hezbollah. They're occupying and invading and infiltrating foreign powers, which they've already done. This is just more manipulation. The strategy aims to empower these

Starting point is 03:32:44 Lebanese military. Rubio claim Israel does not want to remain in Lebanon indefinitely and prefers local security, but that's not what they're doing. As she writes, the U.S. wants to create units inside the Lebanese army trained to attack Lebanese civilians who dare to defend spend themselves from Israeli aggression. Maybe that's a longer and nicer way of saying U.S.-backed death squads in Lebanon to do Israel's dirty work. You and it's trained by the U.S. around the world have a history of

Starting point is 03:33:07 becoming death squads. Yeah, right? Not a history of. It's like the practice. But my point here is that this is not, you got the league, the general who said that he wouldn't, he would side with Hezbollah if he was forced to attack them.

Starting point is 03:33:22 This is not going to work in my opinion. This is floundering. It's very clear that the people of Lebanon are, have been and are leaning in the direction of Hezbole, especially when it comes to Israel. That's my opinion. And I think the reality is that what you're seeing with that general saying that or what this will do is simply cause more average people who may not even be paying attention to simply go, okay, this group's murdering us.

Starting point is 03:33:43 And then we're being told our own government and foreign elements are fighting us to stop that or from us from stopping that. I mean, it becomes self-interest at that point. They don't want to die. So they're going to fight the people who are fighting the people trying to stop. it. And as Sarah Abdullah points out, every day they continue to bomb Lebanon and blow up entire villages. As Glenn points out here, this was a Christian village, by the way, of southern Lebanon before and after. I mean, where's the Christian right? Doesn't it matter that Israel's literally

Starting point is 03:34:14 exploding entire Christian villages all at once with massive explosives, which there's no legal justification for? He says it continues to be a bizarre aspect of U.S. politics that so many American Christians defend Israel, even when it attacks Christian villages and churches and kills Americans and or Christians, as Israel often does, and even seem grateful to pay for it. The Mike Huckabee Complex. And finally, an Israeli soldier released a video, this is Ahmed Nashuan pointing this out, of his city, Fetanun, in Palestine, completely destroyed, not a single house in the city left standing, not a single tree survived, or you could say not a stone upon a stone.

Starting point is 03:34:56 Have you ever seen an army film the genocide it's committing in 360 before? Well, here you go, guys. All the way around. Like, they're bragging about this. They're proud about this. We utterly destroyed this civilization. You don't need, there's nothing to understand. That's clear.

Starting point is 03:35:16 You either choose to do something. You choose to care or you choose to ignore it. I mean, if you're of the mind, even though that's the opposite of what everyone told us, including the ones doing it, that everyone there was a terrorist, that every single home was a tunnel, that everyone everywhere can prove was not the case, then you're just gaslighting yourself into ignoring what you fought to stop. And I mean that to the real people who actually keep following for this, the ones who thought no more wars, the ones who thought that we, I mean, everything,

Starting point is 03:35:46 this is what you got. You got the same thing Kamala and Biden were doing. You got the same thing that our government's always been doing. It's just time to own that. These people, the ones that used to live here are still fighting every second for their future. The larger point that you could make that's, you know, you can argue as hyperbolic, but I do think it rings true is that this

Starting point is 03:36:08 is the future, right? Like the whole we are all Gaza idea. Who's to say if it's going to be entirely Amalek, no stone upon a stone? I doubt that. The point is it's their prerogative at this point. And if we allow this to be the norm, if we allow the new,

Starting point is 03:36:24 that did Lebanon to go the same way, already is and Syria and everywhere else, who's to say it's not going to come for you next? You want to point out what Iran has done. You show me one example where that's happened from Iran anywhere in the world. You can't. Even if you want to claim there, everything they claim, you can't ignore what this is here and that they have utterly and gleefully destroyed an entire civilization, women, children, men, and the reality being that they did so by publicly executing people, raping people,

Starting point is 03:36:55 raping people, torturing people, using people's human shields, literally every single thing that they told you was happening on the other side, all of which you were unable to prove, all of which you could prove in spades from the group claiming they were fighting for you. Sad.

Starting point is 03:37:11 But I know you see it, and I know people are waking up to it, and I know that it is changing. I know people are seeing it. And that is why you get these floundering idiots out there who are just desperately embarrassing themselves just to get you for a moment to not look at it.

Starting point is 03:37:26 Just a flicker. Half a second, oh, well they, and then you can go one more thing done. If we can just keep getting him to look over there, maybe we can stop losing this. I doubt it. The point is that that's what their job seems to be. You see through it.

Starting point is 03:37:40 I know you do. It's why you're here. Help me. Help us all keep this going, guys, because my big concern, I mean, I think people see it. I think that paddle has been won. And now first,

Starting point is 03:37:52 secondarily, it's about marshalling that awareness. And it's like during COVID, everybody thought they were alone when you all saw it. That was my fight at that point more than anything. You're not alone. We all see it. Same thing's happening right now. The same thing. Get those bracelets back out.

Starting point is 03:38:05 You're not alone, right? The point is that we see it and we need to start making sure everybody else recognizes we see it. Because there is a possibility for change. So when that battles won for awareness, well, what's the next step? Actually trying to change things for the better, right? Not voting in some new person to tell you what they'll do and then fail, but actually doing things for yourself. start in your own life. Go out there and do things in your own world

Starting point is 03:38:26 that you can affect change around, make a difference in your world, and spread it out. The point is that we are watching this happen and you can make a change. I believe it. I wouldn't do this if I didn't believe that. It's not some lofty thing.

Starting point is 03:38:38 It's about the reality of what we're actually fighting for. And the fact that we can see the endpoint and they also can see their endpoint. And it's about which one we can get to first. It's up to you. So thank you for tuning in, guys. If you want to support this platform,

Starting point is 03:38:52 plenty of ways to do so. links in the chat down below. We do this for free because we believe in it. We believe in you. So if you find value in it, let us know what it's worth to you. I love you all. As always, question everything. Come to your own conclusions. Stay vigilant. When were you in Gaza? End of April for the first couple weeks. And then there's sniper bullets. I have children that were shot twice. Wait, you're saying that children in Gaza are being shot by snipers. Definitively. I have two children that I have photographs of that were shot so perfectly in the chest that I couldn't put my stethoscope over their heart more accurately and directly on the side of the head in the same child.

Starting point is 03:39:33 No toddler get shot twice by mistake by the world's best sniper. And they're dead center shots. In fact, more than 20 doctors recently in Gaza also told Sunday morning about gunshot wounds to children. American doctor told us he even reviewed CT scans to confirm what he saw because he, quote, didn't believe that this many children could be admitted to a single hospital with gunshot wounds to the head. Some shootings have been captured on video. So of all the disaster zones you've seen, how does Gaza compare? All of the disasters I've seen combined, combined, 40-minute. trips 30 years, ground zero, earthquakes, all of that combined doesn't equal the level of carnage that I saw against civilians in just my first week in Gaza.

Starting point is 03:40:35 And when you say civilians, is it mostly children? Almost exclusively children. I've never seen that before. Never seen that. I've seen more incinerated children than I've ever seen in my entire life combined. I've seen more shredded children in just the first week. Shredded? Shredded. What do you mean?

Starting point is 03:40:57 Missing body parts, being crushed by buildings, the greatest majority. Or bomb explosions, the next greatest majority. We've taken shrapnel as big as my thumb out of eight-year-olds. The UN reports that to date more than 80% of Gaza's population has been displaced, and the majority of its buildings destroyed. a reality which has taken its own toll on the well-being of children. What about the emotional wounds? How can you measure that? I can't measure my own.

Starting point is 03:41:34 How do you be an orphan watching your family, you know, melted in front of you, and shredded in front of you? How do you fix that, ever fix that? In fact, so many Palestinian children have had family members killed that doctors created a shorthand term. WCNSF. Wounded child, no surviving family.

The Last American Vagabond - More Indictments Designed To Fail, Palantir Further Consolidates Control & Iran Calls Trump’s Bluff

There aren't comments yet for this episode. Click on any sentence in the transcript to leave a comment.