The Last American Vagabond - Moroccan Intelligence Agents Found Among Migrants Flooding Into Ceuta

Starting point is 00:00:00 It starts with a simple question and ends an objective reality. Through our journey from there to here, we find one another and ourselves. And as the next 24 hours breaks free from our last, we gaze onward in reflection of the day. Welcome to the daily wrap-up. Sunday, August 2nd, 2026. Thank you for joining me today. Now, we've had some frustrating shows, the last couple shows, last two days, seeing as how, you know, when things go, when I feel like something negative is happening, I double down on how hard I want to try or, you know, do everything I can where I can.

Starting point is 00:00:57 The point is we've had quite a lot of technical stuff. I want to start with a couple of quick points just to acknowledge that and what somebody had said, but bottom line is what I've been dealing with. I mean, actually, I should just start with this since that's what I want to open with today. But the title alone today shows we're going to get into, one of the main points. I made today's show short, focused, a couple of other things that I can choose to ignore if ultimately this goes awry. Because we have basically had non, like untenable shows where it's cutting in and out. Audio's not working.

Starting point is 00:01:28 Videos aren't playing pretty damn consistently. Now I'm up the mind that this is something that's happening on my side, not even necessarily stream yard. So, okay, it's not too bad in regard to that. Let me know in the chat if the audio and video is not working. Somebody sent me this and I just want to make this comment before I even get into what I'm dealing with, what I think is happening. So somebody reached out and simply said, I wish your podcast would not cut in and out constantly. It's getting more and more frustrating and the clips you try to play are cutting in and out for me lately. Your mouth isn't sinking with what you're saying.

Starting point is 00:01:56 But shoot an odyssey, the videos are blurry and we can't see them. So just think about it for a second. Regardless of how good the work is, if that's what you think it is, I believe, we do good work. This will drive away even people who want to see your work. I mean, I don't even know if I would have the patience for something like that. Even, but it's just being honest. And I just think it's important to recognize that this is the entire effort. If indeed, this is something being done. I don't know that for a fact. I think that's the case for a lot of different reasons, but I can't say I can prove that. But what I want to highlight here after that,

Starting point is 00:02:31 oh, actually, oh, that's right. Before I even get in, that's just my opening point I want to make. So here's what I'm dealing with. For those that haven't heard me, basically get into it. Just over the last couple of days, we've been having, like, I think I just described the issues with what this, basically just unkind of discoverable problems where things weren't able to, things weren't functioning. Things would close. Settings would change.

Starting point is 00:02:52 Just an in some crazy amount of things that would happen all over the map. Now, what I was dealing with in particular, and that's been going on a while, as you guys know, I have a speaker here because there's some weird tech issue that won't allow this to work. I'd move my camera. I have to have a second browser open now is to upload the videos because it'd only work if I use a second browser. I don't even explain this stuff. Neither are people that I ask about this

Starting point is 00:03:11 that knows what they're talking about. But that's been going on a long time. And you know in this field, this stuff happens in regard to it being a targeted thing, not that I can say I can prove that, but we know it exists, but it's worth considering. But in the last few days,

Starting point is 00:03:24 I dealt with something or I have been dealing with something on this computer or whatever is happening that I remember from our previous issue. Remember the last time when I had to basically change, I had to get a new computer. It was a couple years ago. I remember what was happening,

Starting point is 00:03:36 which was ultimately, there was a problem with memory where things that were like you i've been using this setup pretty consistently for for i don't know a year and ultimately doing exactly what we're doing lots of pabs a lot of content a lot of videos long streams with neary a glitch of any kind right just pretty damn consistent which i was pretty surprised about and happy about that and so what and all of a sudden everything starts coming uh collapsing and even though we're doing the same thing so it reminded me what happen before, which was that there were normal things, having a normal window open, opening a regular browser, and having for some reason, when you look at the memory, which I have opened

Starting point is 00:04:14 right now, and I can see the things that are changing, where all of a sudden normal things are taking twice as much memory. A browser suddenly is two gigs versus a couple of megabytes. Like that, that's what we're talking, or whatever it normally be. And that's what I'm seeing. Even right now, I can see these things going up in regard to the memory used versus the physical memory and other aspects. And it's not normal. So I'm going to have to deal with that. So what I had to do today was shortened down what I have open, windows I have open, applications running, which is what it is. I don't know if it's going to get worse. It could be a random glitch. I don't know. But the problem now is that it will cause me to change what I do, right? Content length,

Starting point is 00:04:51 in-depth conversation, you know, and it's just one more thing that I have to add to this ongoing list of stuff we have to juggle to just do a normal show. The other people don't even have to consider. Now again, for all I know, that's just something I'm doing on this side. Just to be very honest, I don't think that's the case, but that's just being objective. But I wanted to make sure that was clear for people that frustrated with the recent content, even though they know, appreciate the content, let's say, and ultimately are able to get to the content. It's very frustrating. But the main point I want to relay to start is that no matter what, I'm going to keep doing this.

Starting point is 00:05:22 I don't care if I have to go use my neighbor's computer or go to, you know, whatever the outcome may be, find a way around this. Because to one side note, I did try a different, like, interestingly, and this may actually connect with somebody out there in the technical side of this. using this one with that, the memory issue, I'm not seeing it on a different computer I tried. And if I check the stream in regard to the actual speed of the internet, it is, right now I pay for fiber. So I ultimately get about a gig with 1,000 megabytes.

Starting point is 00:05:53 And on this computer, it constantly registers at about 300 or below, which is still very fast. But it's just showing you a major difference in regard to this computer versus any other one I plug this into. And I can't seem to figure that out with nothing happening. To me, it screams that there's something going on with this computer. Now, I'm going to have to figure that out. I'm going to have to find, either get a new one or whatever ultimately happens. But I want to assure you that this is not going to stop and we're going to keep doing this work,

Starting point is 00:06:17 even if it's incredibly impossible. And I'm not, I'm not the last thing I'm going to do is let that win, even if it's just a bunch of glitches. So to get into this today, the main focal point, obviously, is an interesting report that came out of, it was ultimately a couple different places. I think Provod I'd put it out as well. but it's coming from Spanish authorities and different people in the observation element around what just happened. So the local areas, Moroccan, I think one element was a Moroccan journalist. The point is that this is showing that, and I want to be very skeptical about this, because we're talking about two sides,

Starting point is 00:06:52 and both of them have an interest in the story. Spain, Morocco, as well as everybody else involved, the U.S. Israel, which I'll get into. But ultimately thinking about the fact that, well, they're saying that they found intelligence assets from Morocco guiding what. within along the whole thing. I think that's very relevant because it ties back to what we've seen repeatedly, including in the caravan and plenty of the things and an important point that I'll bring up. But it really speaks to the, I think what we've already pretty much established is something that's not organic. So the question should be why.

Starting point is 00:07:22 You know, why is that? So first I want to start with something again that I'm what I think is interesting in regard to kind of manipulation. So speaking of what the whatever may be happening or just the idea of things we know that do take place, the systems today are built in a way that are so wildly, like, I mean, invasively, monitoring doesn't even do it justice. We've always known that these platforms are, you know, cataloging what you're saying and looking at it for your, you know, what's the word I can't speak today, for your convenience, for your engagement, they want it to be better.

Starting point is 00:07:54 So we know what you're looking for to make it more a smooth experience for you. It's never really about that. But just really quickly. And I am going to make a point about this one thing he said in this interview, but that's not what this is about. So check this out. You guys have noticed this on this platform. We all have seen it, right?

Starting point is 00:08:09 If you see something that you only saw because somebody you follow shared it, it'll show up at the top where it says this person shared it. This person reposted it. But what it has always been before, if you can see the URL, I can't zoom in, but it has always been the person's actual URL who shared it. So Aaron Rappur is the one who made this post. This post currently shows this guy's name. I noticed that.

Starting point is 00:08:33 I said, actually, I noticed it with something else I was doing where it was showing my tag on somebody else's post. And I thought that's strange. So I just want to quickly show you. This is Aaron, whatever, rapport. This is his post. There's the tag. I believe you can see that on the stream. Yeah, I just can't zoom in.

Starting point is 00:08:51 And this is the normal post, right? Now, I only happen to see this post because of this person, who I guess I follow. I'm not even familiar. It looks like, okay, I follow this person. and I saw this post because he shared it. Now, here's the point I'm making. One, it's aggressively tracking how we share and connect and who we see it through and all that stuff. Always been doing that.

Starting point is 00:09:12 But if I only see it through this, which is what I did, you also don't get the conversation. So now what's happening, what it used to be, and I mean like two days ago, is that it would show this, but it would still have the original link and it would still show the original conversation. Now, some people may find this unimportant. I think this is insane. I think this is incredibly, you know, the technocratic world, they're. building, right? This is manipulative. It's surveillance. It is control. It is, you know, it's algorithmic channel. It's all the stuff I'm talking about. My frustration in this is that so now you, it's, you don't get to look at all the engagement, the comments and what people are saying,

Starting point is 00:09:46 you just get what this guy shared in front of you as if it was, you know, it's weird, right? So tracking as well as limited engagement, if it comes through certain channel, that's, it's, it's not, it's, they say, you know, freedom of speech, no freedom, or what's the term they said, freedom of speech, no freedom of reach. Even though, as even Sam Hussein, he said all the way back then, they're the same thing, as even ruled in a legal sense. All they're doing is showing you that this is the case, is they can say, yeah, you can yell as well as you want.

Starting point is 00:10:12 We'll just make sure you're yelling into the cloud, yelling into the shadow, and no one can hear you. I just find that very strange. In any case, for those to find that relevant, I know you see what I'm saying. Now, on the side of the partisanship, before we get into, which really next is the segment about what's happening in Morocco and Spain, or the follow-up from yesterday, I just wanted to make this quick point because I really tinfoil hat girl shared this and says, wow, talk about low information voter. Do these people interact with general public?

Starting point is 00:10:38 If they did, they wouldn't stay stupid like this, say stupid S-H-I-T like this. Now, what's crazy to me is, like I've been really hammering home what I believe is the case in regard to the majority. And I'd like to believe that's become just very obvious at this point, even though, you know, still to this day, I feel like I get a lot of pushback. But I think it's very clear, at least at the majority. Remember, that can be 51% and 49% can still be blindly supporting Trump. But I believe the majority is seeing through this. I think that's very clear.

Starting point is 00:11:07 This point, though, is to make it clear that I also recognize that people like this exist, even though, and I've said that more than once, I really think this is genuine and I think these people exist. I just want to make it clear that I do, that I think it is a single digit perspective. Now, I can be wrong on that. Maybe it's 10%. But I do not believe it's even close to the majority, but this is what the system wants you to think every Trump supporter, every conservative thinks like.

Starting point is 00:11:34 And what I think this is is exactly the low information voter, follower, you know, they follow the herd on either side. These people exist in the same cartoonish way on either side of the paradigm. And the system thrives with that. And they are losing that. I think they've lost that majority a long time ago. But listen to this and you'll see what I'm saying. And it's just, it speaks for tell. and they do exist.

Starting point is 00:12:02 Absolutely. Even if it was against the Constitution? To save this country, yes. To save the country from telling you that. Something. Communism. We should go against the Constitution.

Starting point is 00:12:17 Only if that is our last straw in the war. So it seems like this is playing okay. So right now, even though I'm seeing the memory Macs that come really close to the line, which should never be happening with the stuff that I have up right now,

Starting point is 00:12:30 I figure it out at least for now, going on. So whatever's causing this is causing that to jump up in memory. But if I'm only doing a limited amount of content, apparently I can keep it under the bar that makes it freak out. Welcome to my life of juggling 30,000 things that I can't even see in the air and figuring out it works. But the bottom line, guys, is that she's sorry, I derailed my own thought with that. So they're just commenting on the fact that it seems to be working, let me know. But that she's saying that we're willing to compromise the contract. No, you can argue that she's not necessarily a constitutionalist. So maybe that's not as important to her. And they do exist on both sides of the

Starting point is 00:13:05 paradigm, even that they believe in the larger points of it. But I'd like to, I think this is a person who believes in these things. And the argument comes down to, well, Trump has to break it to save it. How long have we been talking about that? Right. Where we, I trust don't. It's because she trust Trump. And that's crazy. That's naive. But she believed this person's doing what's right. And so he's doing what's right. Therefore, it doesn't matter if he violates the constitution. He'll bring it right back when he needs to. Well, that's not, first of all, how that even works. That's not even possible, okay, in the sense that they can just move on and come back, like it's always there. It is unalienable. It's there. They can choose to respect it or not. And that's not something you just

Starting point is 00:13:41 dance back and forth with. But I just want to highlight the fact that there are people that believe in Biden and Obama and Bush and Trump and think that the only thing that is sacred is that my team is the right team. We all know that, guys, but I really want to stress that if you look around and you ask people, like really ask people, that is not what you're going to get in the majority. You're going to find people that are very on guard when it comes to different partisan perspectives. You're going to find people who still feel very the need to defend the team or maybe even Trump. But if you really get into it, you'll find that they do not think what the media wants you to think, they all stand by.

Starting point is 00:14:15 I just think that's super important. And I'm going to continue to harp on that because I think it's one of the most important traps that are being laid for all of us to get us to think that we have no traction. It's simple. Now, in the media side of it, and this is how I think this relates, I just want to include this either way, you know, you get the, this is the kind of thing you get is this kind of front, right, where R.K. Jr. is going to sit in this interview. And by the way, it's, it's actually worth watching. There's a bunch of things he says. It gets a little contentious. And I agree with many things he says. And in many cases, like era rapport, I called out online earlier,

Starting point is 00:14:51 kind of by saying, you know, you just, because he largely just kind of points to commentary, but it's very partisan. He has a very clear agenda. But it doesn't mean he puts out, things that are irrelevant. A lot of people put content online. But what he did was basically lay out, it was the one I was showing you earlier. I should have just read it. He laid out what the conversation was

Starting point is 00:15:08 and just casually left out like RFK's entire answer. So if you read just the text, it seems as if RFK was the one, you know, but if you listen to it, he gave a great answer. It was Dana Bash, Bush, Bash, who ultimately was the one saying,

Starting point is 00:15:21 you know, like his answer, her asking was like, what do you do different if another pandemic comes or when another pandemic comes? doesn't really push back on that, is ultimately that, well, you know, we have to care about constitutional rights. And I think that's a fantastic answer. I just question whether he actually means that or even if he does, whether he'll be able to do it. Very important, right?

Starting point is 00:15:41 But so ultimately, it goes on to other things, too, that we need. Like, I thought his answer was actually very sound, that we need to, like, if you're, if you can't understand that caring about our rights means first and foremost, even if there's danger, that that has to come first. Like, people like this don't get that or care about that. my point though in general the interview is interesting but i want to stress that i just don't think r k is in a position to do anything he's even fronting by your say because either he's incapable of doing so like we've been seeing or he doesn't even mean it because how are we going to take it at

Starting point is 00:16:10 face value he's promote they're promoting shots at this point on top of that which is the point rfka junior literally says he wants people to get the mr shot like i'm just like spinning in my chair going what like i mean i know i doesn't surprise me he's already basically said that before but I just don't understand this. So his argument, essentially, is that the measles shot is the one that has been tested. And by the way, I agree with his larger argument about the idea that these things haven't been tested properly and the Dana doesn't know that. And you can prove he's right, by the way. But at the end of the day, they're still giving them, still promoting them, still leading that direction.

Starting point is 00:16:44 But on top of that, that the MMR vaccine is three different shots that have not been tested alongside each other. He has been screaming about that. They still have not done that. The measles shot individually, he's arguing, has been tested in a way that the rest haven't. The MMR shot was the focal point behind the Vax documentary, behind all of this, kind of one of the largest moments that spurred on this conversation, and he wants you to take it.

Starting point is 00:17:07 Guys, I just don't even understand that because it's not, in a real sense, other than the measles shot being studied differently, hasn't really changed the problem. Even if you understand what the problem was, even if that measles shot was different, there's still a problem that they highlighted that he pointed to. I'll leave it there.

Starting point is 00:17:22 I just kills me. Oh, I had this up, by the way. I think I brought it down. The whole thing is still relevant. This is just what I was showing the entire time. RFK union says he wants people to get the MMR vaccine. Here's the clip. With people's DNA, what's predisposed to have an autistic child. Are you doing both? Yeah, but, but Dana, you probably don't understand this because you're not assigned this, but genes don't cause. Genes don't cause. I understand genes, epidemics.

Starting point is 00:18:00 Epidamination. A gene provides an environmental. That's what I'm asking. Are you studying the environmental exposure? We're looking at all the different environmental exposures, but your statement, you have been If you watch positive really quickly. Your statement that this is not. There we go.

Starting point is 00:18:18 Studying all the different environmental factors, you know, you can study all day long. We already know what's the problem. And he's told us what the problem is. But now he's in an administration that either won't let him do anything or he lied the entire time. I frankly think it's the former, too, maybe a little bit of a mix, but, you know, dioxins and Pfass and endocrine disrupting chemicals and all the different stuff that we know is a very real problem. They're not, I mean, in fact, they're going the other direction.

Starting point is 00:18:42 They're pulling back on PFAS stuff. They're allowing deregulation. They are pushing for glyphosate use. I mean, it's just insane. So that's what I mean, I shouldn't keep reiterating that point, but I think it's frustrating, isn't it, that we can have people, good people, I argue, whether informed or not, that truly believe that they mean what they say when all they ever do is, say things and never do them.

Starting point is 00:19:02 True. It's categorically not for any of this. It is considered at. Consider by who? By every scientist who has studied this. That is not true. I can give you hundreds of scientists who have looked at this. So on the one hand, you understand why people are getting.

Starting point is 00:19:20 It's the natural academy of sciences. What greater authority do you understand why people are not getting measles vaccines because they're hearing you say that it could cause. change the subject. I'm not. It's very much related. Show me one of the studies that's been done on the first eight, the vaccines during the first six months of life, you will not find them. The National Academy of Sciences say that's the case, why are you telling people to get the mutual vaccine? So that's his first point, right? So that's why I'm saying, okay, now you can disagree or just, you know, a lot of people thought he was going to be Mr. anti-vaccine, even though it was never really what he said. It was with

Starting point is 00:19:57 the media framed him as and even his own supporters bought that, I guess. but he's saying it's been tested differently. Okay. Well, that's one thing. Are you giving individual measles shots by themselves because it's been tested? No. He's talking about the M.R vaccine as they go on to talk about. And that kills me.

Starting point is 00:20:11 Now, to someone's comment, you know, is he compromised? My feeling is that he's genuinely exasperated right there, which gives me the sense that he's frustrated that the media, people like her, just can't even grasp the obvious verify. It's like people like us and how frustrated we were during COVID-19, with these same people acting like we were crazy for pointing to the science they said didn't exist. You know, but I don't know how to work that out. Is he faking that?

Starting point is 00:20:37 That's possible. Or is he, you know, it's just, it's the point we have to come to because we don't know for sure what his intention is, is that this does not translate to the outcome, just like the voting process. We can prove that, I think. So it's not irrelevant, why, but let's, if we were going to solve the problem, let's basically start with the problem. You know, and then his intentions can come after the fact. I mean, because it could just be that he's not even aware. is being manipulated somehow. I mean, who knows. But that's, again, going on to the MMR part,

Starting point is 00:21:03 I think it just speaks for itself. Okay. It's the only one that has been studied. Do you want people to get the... I know you're frustrated now. And it is... I don't... I'm not frustrated at all. I am frustrated.

Starting point is 00:21:25 The reason you are the HHS Secretary and you are talking about things that lead to... Okay, so this is what's... crazy, right? So, and this is sort of like, Dan, if you do, Dan, if you don't, kind of a thing. And this is a side note, kind of what it looks like to be like audience captured, you know, is that you come into this. And from my perspective, I'm like, oh, my God, he's pushing the M.R vaccine. Like, that's insane. And she's looking at the same answer and going, you're causing vaccine hesitancy. So it's like, he loses every, this is what it looks like to not take a

Starting point is 00:21:54 principled stance and go all the way, all or nothing, right? To just be like, I said this, these things are bad. And she'll still call you Auntie Vax. The difference is you'd have people on the other side that would go, thank God, somebody actually cares, and we're going to stand by you. But see, I would be doing that if he actually followed through with what he was going to do. Trump or not. See my point? But now he doesn't. He says all these things and then and then why, again, you can debate. Frustrating, though. To the point of bringing that up here was both to show you that, but also just to consider the fact that the corporate media, the media apparatus, the manipulation of it is if, you know, if you don't get content like ours, I am a,

Starting point is 00:22:32 independent objective content. This is the kind of stuff that gets jammed up people's throats. And a similar kind of point. And I just think this is interesting in a sense of where the left-right paradigm goes. And right, there's a couple points today from Trump and others that, you know, and you guys know this, I think by and large, because you're in a conversation that stresses the do-party illusion, but that it's right now they're caring about, you know, the left cares about, you know, Israel's infiltration.

Starting point is 00:22:59 They care about this. So they claim, right? They don't really do much. They care about this. Don't impeach. They don't want to stop this, but they don't. you know, whatever it is. But then when the teeter-totter flips and suddenly Democrats are in power, or I guess in the sense that, well, yeah, so right now they're the ones calling it out.

Starting point is 00:23:13 And then when they become in power, well, suddenly then they don't care about those problems anymore. There's a different rationale. Sort of FISA 702 was suddenly bad. Then it became good when they were in power. It just, it's never changes. And then it's suddenly the Republicans will be the ones starting to go, hey, we care about Israel doing this and we think the money is too much. And so the same point here, Crypto Rover says insane. National U.S. debt just hit a record high of $40 trillion. A record. This is the administration that swore the opposite in every way.

Starting point is 00:23:43 Less spending, less money, less military. It's just the opposite of all that. Out of just 45 U.S. presidents in history, President Trump has now solely responsible for 28.6% of the national debt. I mean, he's breaking records in that regard. Like, you can't pretend like this is some kind of a 40-chest move, guys, unless it's in his benefit. Now, Shannon says when the Democrats take power,

Starting point is 00:24:05 the Republicans will suddenly be concerned about the debt. Bookmark this. I think she's spot on. I just have, I don't even sure who it is. I'll follow her because of that point. Who cares what her political side is? If she has good takes, we'll follow going forward. The point is, I agree.

Starting point is 00:24:20 That suddenly, or, you know, in the moment, it doesn't matter to Republicans because Iran and it will figure it out. We'll get money from Venezuela, you know, whatever it is. And then it won't change. And then when they become the other side of it, they can point to it and go, they did this and it started with Biden, it's lazy. And I don't think people are falling for it anymore. But I guess the takeaway, in case you missed it, is that they all benefit from the cycle, guys.

Starting point is 00:24:41 It is a hamster wheel and it never stops. And they all continue benefiting and handing off the baton. And we always point at the other side of it. And it's a very clear model to keep us pointing away from the people currently responsible, even when they're all responsible. And even in that sense, only pointing at half the responsibility. So you never really get change. That's the whole point.

Starting point is 00:25:02 So in this larger sense, as we're talking about Israel infiltration, well, it's happening all over the world, guys, and that's really important to understand. And we've been continuing to highlight that for a decade plus. Now, this we just talked about yesterday, Spain's weaponized engineered migration. And it trumps floundering with Iran. We'll point two more at the end.

Starting point is 00:25:20 And the coming third party deception where we highlighted the idea of the Tucker. And by the way, Steve has been talking about this for a long time now. This is basically his prediction since what? a year ago that Tucker, Margherteller Green, Massey, they had that picture at the table and, you know, I just,

Starting point is 00:25:36 I hope for the best and I, and I hold their feet to the fire. And historically, they never seem to follow through with their promises. So I'm expecting the third party shoe to drop. Go into the show if you want to get more into that. I think there's more to be said about, you know,

Starting point is 00:25:49 where it goes and what their motivations are and how both Vance and Alice Jones, or excuse me, both Tucker and Alice Jones are very supportive of J.D. Vance, whether or not they've publicly endorsed him a president, which I've never said. The point is that they're clearly supportive of him, which makes them hypocrites because he is identical to all the things he's pointing out. He just has a different, you know, look at the end of the day, if he's going to stand up and

Starting point is 00:26:09 give you a little eye slant that makes him look like he suddenly doesn't agree with Trump and everyone makes them into a case, listen to what he said. Look at his policies. He's continued to back everything they've been doing and they want you to believe he's different. Maybe, but maybe since we just went through the cycle of all these people admitting they were played by Trump, that maybe we can go, hey, why fall in line with the next person who is only promising and yet to deliver? Doesn't that seem like basic logic? But see, these people's minds only fall back into the same cycle. You pick a team and you run with it, guys.

Starting point is 00:26:41 That's what they do. Mostly, I think, because it ultimately benefits them. But in this case, Spain's engine and migration. Now, the bigger point of this was that it's obvious that there's manipulation here, guys. As the New York Times pointed out, as we'll mention again from this article today, is that there were people in the crowd that said they were, told to do this. Now, of course, that could be a lie. But there's historically very obvious cases here. Now, one of the main ones is that there's a conversation about West Sahara that took

Starting point is 00:27:06 place when the U.S. government said that they had the rights to it, Morocco, in 2020. 2023, Israel said the same thing. Right? So that's a long time ago. Now, that's being either dishonestly or just in, without due diligence being conflated with the current conversation. largely of Sweta and Malia, I believe. But Sweta is the focal point, I guess, the larger focal point. But the idea is on the map, we're talking about something that is between Africa and Spain, and the idea is that the tip of Africa, which is, you know, you have the Morocco claim to that area is something Spain claims is theirs.

Starting point is 00:27:42 Now, there's a lot of overlaps. Because the, and the point to make is that the U.S. and Israel have been driving Morocco to take that territory back for years. Benjamin Netanyahu's son posted about it in 2019, saying, hey Arabs and Muslims, you want to take your land back, start here. Exactly like that. He claims, of course, he was making a point, and maybe he was, but the whole reality of it is there's an obvious,

Starting point is 00:28:01 now, nobody honest is saying that Netanyahu's son's post proved they did it. It doesn't. You can argue it suggests that, but you can't prove that he was not, you know, but I do believe it's relevant. And of course, I believe it's clear when you look into the deeper connections between Morocco and the U.S. and Israel, and how this is continued, which I'm going to show more today. But the real point, or that, let me guess, yeah,

Starting point is 00:28:22 beyond the motivations is that there's, I think there are organic things involved here. Clearly there are people involved like in any other situation, which I went into depth in this conversation on the first, that are abused. They're used. So it shouldn't be that everybody here is an operative. Like that's just kind of a lazy take. Like it's always more than that. But we need to understand that this was motivated.

Starting point is 00:28:42 People were paid. They were directed. And it's all on the record at this point. But that doesn't mean it's all fake. Now motivation wise, I think it's obvious. I think there's a clear motivation for the U.S. government to use this as the example of why they need what they need. And even with today's article exposing that there were Moroccan intelligence operatives involved, it still makes a case for why the

Starting point is 00:29:02 intensive technocratic surveillance is necessary. So there's all these different angles to it. But what's crazy is that so first you have the idea that they're going to see this is what they get for their liberal policies and invasion, even though it was orchestrated. And it wasn't what they're dealing before. And then on top of that, or then secondarily, you have the idea from Israel's perspective. Which they're playing into that too. the idea of the American immigration policy point, but you have the other side of it where they're, oh, I guess, and then I guess a third idea would be,

Starting point is 00:29:29 look at what you get when you pretend Muslims are good. Like, that's what you're getting from a lot of the Zionist conversation. Just disgusting. And again, that it assumes that everybody with the skin color is automatically Muslim from the skin. It's not true, guys. There's Christians and all, I mean, it's, there's a multifaceted thing.

Starting point is 00:29:43 There's always a majority whenever you go, but to pretend that they're Moroccan and they're Muslim is just racist. It's disgusting. It's big at it. It's not the truth. But again, the last point was, I believe Israel is also playing into this from a different angle. That you're not really hearing from the U.S. perspective, which is that they use this to overlap with their situation. There's an interesting kind of side story about how Zionists in the United States have kind of lost the plot

Starting point is 00:30:07 and are arguing so blatantly in the way that makes them look like what we call them, that it's hurting the Israeli agenda. And so even right now you see them really harping on the U.S. interest from their Zionist perspective. But at the same time, that kind of makes the case for why what's happening is like basically, shows you that Israel occupying the territory is a bad thing. Like it's interesting because they're saying Spain shouldn't be doing that. It's colonial. And it's like, oh, wait, hold on. This is exactly what Israel is doing right there.

Starting point is 00:30:31 So it's a mixback. But from Israel's side of it, I think they're pushing the idea that ultimately that if their colonialism exists, then so should ours. Which is what, but Danny Dan and plenty of others pointed out. So it's interesting, right? So keeping that in mind, we went over this more in depth yesterday. This is what came out today. The Civil Guard detects Moroccan intelligence is translated from Spanish, I believe.

Starting point is 00:30:57 The Civil Guard detects Moroccan intelligence agents among the migrants who sneaked into Suita. The Civil Guard detected the presence of agents from the Moroccan Information Service through the Amos deployed at the border. Now, I'll come back to that with the part at the end, what they really stress, that this is why it's important with the surveillance and the facial, you know, it feels a little bit specific. But it says this is revealed exclusively to El Espagnol by sources from the general staff of the Armed Institute, who assure that these individuals were located during monitoring, carrying it out in real time using the advanced and cutting edge video surveillance system that controls the border perimeter. So, you know, I don't think this is the only thing, but just for sake of conversation, it'd be interesting if the only reason all this happened was to rationalize intensive real-time surveillance. even though we all have it, there's a lot of pushback to it.

Starting point is 00:31:50 Now, I don't think that's the case. I think that might be a secondary byproduct of, you know, hey, we can use that either way. It's worth considering. But it says, according to these sources, the presence of members of the Moroccan intelligence services mixed among the migrants, it does not constitute an isolated event, but a phenomenon that the Civil Guard claims to have detected in previous episodes of migratory pressure on both the territories of Suitsa and Malia.

Starting point is 00:32:15 So what they're saying is they've been doing this before. Now, I'm going to get into how clear it is that there's basically, you know, what they're trying to do in the U.S. right now, merging the military and the intelligence services that I think has long ago happened in Morocco. And plenty of other places that Israel has forced. I mean, the whole normalization thing with some of these countries, that's what that sort of amounts to if you allow Israel. Look at Venezuela. Look at what they're actually doing on the ground. That's what this kind of, you know, it amounts to not just occupation, but what's a better word for?

Starting point is 00:32:43 Like, you know, control, really. but more than just sort of militarily dictating, you know, but like invasively getting involved in the politics and then projecting that country's politics as if you're not involved. And funny, David Ike and I talked about this in regard to Sabbatianism. Let me see if I get that to come up.

Starting point is 00:33:06 Yeah, it's a good conversation. We talked about what he argues is the kind of one of the foundational elements of, technically Zionism, Nazism, and communism, which is Saboteism. And the title of the interview was Zionism infiltration of Judaism, weaponized migration, and mainstream media. Important right now. Actually, I should share that out again.

Starting point is 00:33:29 But so the idea that this Saboteanism, Sabatians were, like, he argues, based on his history and his research of it, were basically, like it was centered around infiltrating religions and politics and and it's very relevant, isn't it? Share that out really quickly. Seems especially relevant. There's a lot of that going around right now. So continuing, back to the point is that that it's not an isolated event. Now it says, in fact, the New York Times, as we showed you yesterday, spoke with several Moroccan nationals who claimed they were encouraged to cross into the areas by the Moroccan authorities. Sources from Spanish information services corroborate what was observed by those responsible for the Armed Institute through the camera on the Benny and Tsar perimeter.

Starting point is 00:34:19 They point out that an operation of these characteristics, typical of hybrid warfare, that's very relevant from an Israel-U.S. perspective, could not have been carried out without the participation of the service that operates in Morocco. Quote, it is the logical procedure for any intelligence service. It says the purpose of the presence was to observe the operational response to the security forces in court and follow the events on the ground. So they're arguing their perspective is that this was done to see how they reacted, testing the waters, if you will.

Starting point is 00:34:51 How are they going to, where do they come? What part of the area do they come at hardest? Sort of saying they're testing this for future action. The Civil Guard considers that these systems constitute a fundamental tool. This is about the surveillance. Not only to detect attempts at irregular entry, but also to identify behaviors that may be of interest to state security. So no matter where you look in the world, they're pushing the idea of technocratic surveillance.

Starting point is 00:35:18 Real-time surveillance like biometric surveillance, if not pre-crime, which is what that sounds like. And this is what Trump has been pushing aggressively since its first administration to this very point. He's doing it still. This is according to the sources consulted, it was precisely the real-time analysis of these images, the real-time analysis of these images, the real-time now, that's AI, that made it possible to notice the presence of people attributed to Moroccan information services. So it's funny. So this is what gave them the insight to find out they were being manipulated, but it's promoting the idea of real-time AI facial recognition. The migratory pressure on Sweta, how it was again?

Starting point is 00:35:54 Swayta, I think so. It continues to be one of the main security challenges for Spain on the southern border of Europe. And here's Trump going exactly. Interesting. So the basic point, guys, is that this has been called out from a lot of different angles that they had Moroccan intelligence, agents, involved, while this was all going down. Israel, Times of Israel, from 2020,

Starting point is 00:36:18 a look at Israel's decades-long covert intelligence ties with Morocco. And it goes in depth about the long background of these two, it goes back hundreds of years, or at least in regard to the U.S. connection to, I think 1783. Times of Israel, 2021. Israel, Morocco defense deal opens door to intel sharing, joint drills.

Starting point is 00:36:40 So you see where this goes. not just allies infiltration or if you want to call it coordination it's the same kind of thing they're pushing in this country that by the way it's already happening these are just further implementations of the same policy 2023 Israel and Morocco bolster cybersecurity

Starting point is 00:36:59 intelligence ties military intelligence like it's the same kind of thing we're seeing right now from Senate from NDAA the two countries also agreed to expand cooperation in air defense, warfare. And you know this is obvious, guys. This is from 2020, what was it, 2023? Later, I think that was January, this one is August. Morocco and Israel will collaborate on military intelligence systems. He's starting to get the case. How encroaching more and more, it's very

Starting point is 00:37:29 obvious what this amounts to with what Israel's doing in the world. 2024. Morocco, Israel, agreed to expand their military cooperation. Like after what you just, I mean, it's clear that this has become something that's already happened. This is expanding it and you read the article, it becomes insanely clear what they're talking about. The Morocco, the Moroccan Israeli relationship. This is from 2024, new horizons and the prospects of cooperation in Africa. Interestingly comes to mind talking about, you know, intelligence services crossing the border where we had the conversation in 2024 about the people on the false fake Maga Wright was screaming about saying, see, this is a Hamas member. He's a Palestinian. It was when that guy

Starting point is 00:38:10 came to the border and said, you'll know my name. Remember that? You know, why it never amounted anything, which was clearly being set up because the guy worked for Mossad. And we broke it down on the show. It's suspected terrorists at Texas border, works for Mossad. They lied about who he was. They framed an old picture. Watch it all.

Starting point is 00:38:28 Watch it all. Just like every other partisan narrative we're seeing. The bottom line was once it became clear that Mossad was the one doing it, everyone stopped talking about it. Kind of easy, kind of clear, right? Now, lastly on this, I just this relevant. We were talking about this yesterday, right? Whereas Luke comes out and says, the conspiracies were right and points to this random page that says U.S. joins Israel and recognizing

Starting point is 00:38:50 Morocco's control of Western Sahara, which we just talked about, right? And it's just some random gray picture. I don't know why, I guess, this lack of due diligence is the point. And so I commented saying, well, this actually happened in 2020, which is Trump's post, 2020, saying he recognizes Western Sahara. So it's not the conversation of today. Also Israel in 2023, recognizing Western Sahara. So it's not new. It's not breaking information. as it says, breaking. And what's funny is, literally this, and this wasn't there before, so whoever is one of these reader-added context people saw my post and literally added

Starting point is 00:39:20 exactly what I posted. Like exactly. I just find that funny. But it says the U.S. recognized Morocco's sovereignty over Western Sahara on 2020 and Israel in 2023. And then what's funny is he deletes the post, which you might expect. But I just think that's important to the larger game of people who are just kind of grifting it out there, whether they mean to or not.

Starting point is 00:39:38 It's about just reactionary things instead of in-depth. conversation. I had this in just in case it went away. But I find that very relevant for a lot of reasons. This is the young Turk for talking about this last night. And it's gone. And it's gone. So the reason I bring it up is simply to point out that there are people who are kind of just going through the motions and misleading people based on information that will get them reach. And at the same time, since we're talking about deleted posts, like that casual transition, let's talk about how this relates to ICE and surveillance and flock. Now, be your own doctor posted. your deleted S-H-I-T is not deleted.

Starting point is 00:40:14 Maybe it looks to think about that. I'm just kidding. And Australian cops now use Israeli spyware to prove it. So this is coming from, I mean, look, it's so funny to me how this constantly comes up. And like, I honestly don't even give that much thought to people who try to pretend were, you know, choosing to overfocus on one thing. As much as I can clearly give, my opinion is clear about what I think Israel is and what they're doing today.

Starting point is 00:40:39 Not every Israeli or every Jew, but clearly the government and clearly what the country is guiding, just like in this country. But what's crazy to me is that when I do my research on this, I'm not looking, like it depends on whether it's relevance. If I'm looking about a conversation that involves all of them, I'm going to see if Israel's doing something that's relevant. And I'm looking into something that has to do with, you know, something completely disconnected. The point is I'm going to try to find connections that are relevant to that conversation. It's not like everything we look into is, is Israel involved. The point is, Israel is involved in almost everything that we're talking about today. So the funny thing is it becomes, why are you focusing on them?

Starting point is 00:41:12 It's like, I'm not. I'm focusing on who is involved and they happen to be. If you're now saying we should ignore Israel's involvement in all of these crazy things because you think that shouldn't be pointed to, who's the problem in that equation? I just think it's crazy. So my point is in this, it's the spyware element of this is it's Israeli. Guys, they're the leading element around the world. And they're the ones that are leading in regard to the technology.

Starting point is 00:41:34 in conjunction with Palantir that's going to ice, that's going to, you know, the surveillance state that's being built on back of the back of the 9-11 one is almost uniquely connected to Israel. And that's proven. It's not some secret, you know, whistleblower document. It's stated documentation of their collaborations. It's their tech.

Starting point is 00:41:52 It's their companies. It's their intelligence. So just make that point again. So on this case, it's not to try to make the connection. It's that this spyware is obvious. And what Israel's involvement in it is very relevant, with the point we're making in the larger sense of what they're doing in the world and specifically with the U.S. government.

Starting point is 00:42:09 Now, this is in Australia. Their police are getting roadside powers, feels relevant right now, to scan your phone, resurrect every photo you ever took, even though you deleted them, every message you ever sent and jail you for five years if you won't hand over the password. So all this feels very relevant right now, right? with the border patrol. None of these people ever seem to care that your rights are a block

Starting point is 00:42:36 to what they want to get. I'll show you some clips right now that I do think are very relevant. First, this is not ice. This is the IDF. The IDF executes this man for driving normally down the road. Then, when it comes out,

Starting point is 00:42:55 they claimed it had stopped a ramming attack. But of course, then they forgot to scrub the CCTV footage that shows that wasn't true. So for the podcast, there's no audio that's just playing. So what their argument was, the car ran it then and attack them. But in case you're unsure, the reality is quite the opposite. As they walk up on it, the bottom line, guys, ice right now. I mean, I can probably right now pull up 10 different examples on my files of ice that have claimed they were hit by a car or hit

Starting point is 00:43:36 with, will really just take even the car, but you could say hit with a shovel, shot with a gun, and they've lied about that, not just accident, knowing they were lying deliberately, but just taking the car, how many times they claimed they were hit, or they've tried to use their car as a weapon, and then it gets dismissed because the video comes out. And so all I want to say,

Starting point is 00:43:53 doesn't that seem familiar? It should, right? It should. Well, because we know that they were trained, right? I mean, I think this is actually, I think this is the clip. I thought I grabbed it. Yeah, good.

Starting point is 00:44:06 You know, the nation over there has a lot. a lot of influence on the israeli government has a lot of influence on our politicians over here i think is what he was kind of getting at i see yeah and you know i'm not a politician so i don't know and you know it's uh the only dealings i ever had with the israelis is when i was a young agent with boerchak bartical unit uh they sent me to a VIP security school and it was ran by the Israelis. And let me say, so IDF actually does work with Border Patrol and ICE, because I've always heard that. Well, it was, that school was for all law enforcement. It was, they put it on. It was Israeli, they contracted with Israeli instructors. They had a lot of experience and they were really good.

Starting point is 00:44:55 I'll, uh, hands off some of the best training I've ever had. They did. In case you're unclear for the podcast, that's Babino. You know, that little midget monster that was ruining everybody's lives because he's an absolute partisan maniac. I mean, just aggressively violating rights all over the place because you're a lefty terrorist. I mean, and just proudly admitting that it's not just the IDF, I mean, not just ICE, but it's the police, which you already know because you watch the show, because you do your due diligence. And you also know that it's not ubiquitous. It's not literally every police officer, everybody and everybody, but it does happen and it goes

Starting point is 00:45:26 from the top down. And so we have to be real, guys, when they're lying about cars ramming them, when they're throwing grenades in somebody's car and holding the door shut and running. away. This is what they're giving to people in authority here. And I guess apparently they don't they like that or they're proud of it. I don't know. I mean, some people are. You look at the Trump administration and you understand exactly what I'm saying. And that's not a partisan attack. That is the reality of the incompetence, the level of insecurity that we're seeing in this. Frankly, I could make plenty of examples of left and right all the way down. But right now,

Starting point is 00:46:00 it's a special time in a bad way. Now here's a couple quick clips I want to play. Now let me know if some of these, again, that the videos aren't playing properly, so I can just stop them and just explain it for you. But Jesus freaking Congress shared this. And this is a small example. I mean, you guys, if you watch this show, you've seen the endless, horrifying examples of people's, you know, armed being broken, being shot to death in the street, of ICE, you know, doing any number of things that aggressively violate their rights, kicking in the front doors of American citizens, which, by the way, it shouldn't matter either way, since everybody has constitutional rights, even though stupid people don't know that. In this case, an ICE agent,

Starting point is 00:46:35 casually walks across the street and just sprays a lady in the face. Now look, you have to understand no matter what we're talking about. If this was something, if she broke the law, then that wouldn't be the proper response to quietly walk over there. So, I mean, you go through the list. There's no world in which what he did, what I'm about to show you is legal. He's abusing his power because he doesn't like that she's calling him a name, filming him. It doesn't matter, guys.

Starting point is 00:47:02 She didn't break the law. And even if she did, then you should arrest her instead of, spraying her in the face and walking away. Oh, that's right. It's not, I can just show you right here. So bottom line is she, this guy casually walks over. Yeah, so you can hear, you get out of my effing city. Okay, well, this is supposed to be the group that believes in free speech, right?

Starting point is 00:47:34 Look at that. I mean, guys, I don't care what you're saying. That's somebody's mother. That's somebody's sister, friend, neighbor. Like, she's just standing there. And you just open up with spraying them. And, you know, and not to go into some crazy, but realize we're, in Israel, they do stuff like this and it turns out they're not using normal stuff they use they use gas they

Starting point is 00:47:52 calls tear gas that kills people on the regular that gives people seizures i mean and on top of that i wouldn't be surprised if there's things flying the way into this country's use that these people don't even know the origin of now again that's probably not be the best point to make it's just my opinion but at the end of the day you don't you have to understand this should shock people that's brazen lawlessness they don't care your rights don't matter and they know that nobody will care. They know that the very people screaming about constitutional rights will laugh at that and say that's what she gets. That needs to matter if you're left, if you're right, if you're an American citizen, guys. That's insane. It's insane. And then it just walks away. That's a coward, guys. That's a coward.

Starting point is 00:48:36 That is a coward who is abusing his power. So we have examples like this, 18-year-old kid, where people walk up and we keep showing you these. And all you got is a bunch of guys in black with hoods on arresting somebody. Now, yeah, yeah, they have a gun on, right? But how many times do you have to talk about the endless examples, it seems, of women being raped, people being robbed, home invasion, because people dress up like ICE and nobody cares to do anything about it? And the only reason they're allowed to do that or they're able to is because of this, because of unaccountable, illegal enforcers who are not giving warrants, who are not giving their name and badge number, and so it opens the door for anybody. How do we know? Why would I trust that those aren't

Starting point is 00:49:23 human traffickers pretending to be ICE? just like what we saw in the airport where a bunch of random people that didn't look anything like ICE agents, not even close to like this, look random dress clothes and look like a bunch of frankly a couple of kids and some random woman

Starting point is 00:49:38 and they had the guy in one handcuff, they run off and leave the handcuff on his wrist and just leave. And then ICE post the next day or that a couple days later that they picked him up at a different airport. And so it was ICE. At least they pretend that it was.

Starting point is 00:49:50 And how do we know that? Why wouldn't somebody step in? Now you have this two, you have two things. You have a side where people are choosing to hold back when maybe he needs your help. Maybe that's a bunch of monsters. Maybe that's Trenda Raqba and MS-13 stealing our children.

Starting point is 00:50:03 But you're going to go, well, maybe it's ice, so I'm going to let it go. Or, I mean, you know the alternative, right? You have a situation where people are abusing your rights. Either way, it's not justifiable. Either way, in an honest situation with a government that cared about your rights, this would these people would be immediately, you know, at least fired and hopefully charged with a crime for what they're doing. But that's not what's happening.

Starting point is 00:50:27 And I argue, you guys, as much as you may disagree for some, it's no different. Like, I would, like, I would like to, I would argue that if Biden was in power, that it wouldn't be happening like this. But I would argue that it would take the form of something else. It would be aimed at the right. It'd be done in some other way about Nazis, about, you know, whatever it is. Probably ISIS or something in the same way.

Starting point is 00:50:45 And so it would take a form of a different narrative, but would amount to the same thing. That's the left-right paradigm, guys. So this, as David says, we are, supposed to pretend this is what law enforcement than a free country looks like? It doesn't, guys. That's not the reality because, one, they're breaking a law, two, they're violating rights, and three,

Starting point is 00:51:03 it simply demonstrates the kind of faceless authoritarian enforcement that we're just supposed to count to no matter what. Nobody agrees with that. Now, lastly, on this segment, I love this clip. So this guy is sitting

Starting point is 00:51:19 in McDonald's. And I've been playing a lot of these. And what I'm trying to highlight here two things. One is the right way to respond to these things in my opinion, but also that you have cops, not ice, but cops all over this country that seems to be exploding where they're, and I'm clearly think that this is a training thing because they're acting like one, like step out of the car and if you say no, that's obstruction. Even if we just told you we're not even arresting you're pulling you over. That's not how the law works, guys. That's policy. They're violating your rights and the Constitution with that. But I keep seeing that. Or in cases like this, they just

Starting point is 00:51:50 demand you take action when you're in a public space. You're not violating the law. you have every right to be sitting at McDonald's while you're eating your food, you'll see how this goes. But these people believe they're above the law because they're enforcers. They don't believe their job is to protect the Constitution. They don't believe their job is to protect and serve. They believe their job is to be followed, that you adhere to their demands because I'm in power, respect my authority. That's what these people are. And really what it comes down to is trying to remove this man from McDonald's another person because he's homeless. Do you like to be part of this dude? Sir, it's not up for discussion. It's either

Starting point is 00:52:30 ID or move? It's a lawful man. These cops were harassing a homeless man at McDonald's when this man began filming. He never spoke, never interfered, just quietly filmed. But that alone was enough to set the cops off. Their fragile egos couldn't handle being watched. So they tried every tactic to intimidate him. Now, of course, you can obviously argue that the guy spoke and yelled at them and he cut it out. That's what a being objective is like.

Starting point is 00:52:55 But it doesn't change the reality. You're allowed to say in what you want, guys. call him whatever you want. You can be as rude as you want. But of course, then you can, that you have to then understand that he can then, he might act in violence against you, which would be his crime. He should be put in jail for that. Clearly the system doesn't care today. So my point is to think about that. But in this case, he doesn't really say anything. There's one thing I can you hear him say to himself, but the reality is he just sat there and he's eating, he paid for his meal, he has had a right to be there. And ended up embarrassing themselves.

Starting point is 00:53:30 step ahead because some because of the look at his prerogative it's his business no look that's his business my point is that i just think that's you know what a lame thing to do you know it's either way it's how they start regarding the guy who's just sitting there He can't check his fucking back, right? One thing he says, but it's to himself. You can't check his bag. So, you know, there's a guy just sitting in McDonald's.

Starting point is 00:54:22 He's not breaking the law. He just is a homeless guy. They don't want him there. And now they're just, you know, get up. Let me search you. Let me look in your bag. It's like, he has rights too, guys. But he just knows that as a homeless person, you know, they're not going to care.

Starting point is 00:54:32 He has, like, even people in our position will end up being abused, even though they know we have people we can put this out to, audiences that will listen. But imagine in a place like this. Like, they don't, they know this person will have no. traction unless somebody like this gets the video out for them. But even then, who, you know, no one knows who that guy is. It's like it's a very different. They know that the likelihood is they can abuse his rights and there'll be no consequences. And now they kind of think that it seems with most Americans, too. Ask why that is. So he doesn't answer. I'm telling you guys, this is a lesson. Never answer questions. I mean, look,

Starting point is 00:55:41 Lawyers will tell you that. I've said this before. Cops will tell you that who have retired. They will find, like, the bottom line is that there's no benefit to you. If they're going to charge, unless, I mean, if you feel like you want to help, you think you have some information that may help them, yeah, feel free. But there are plenty of examples that lawyers will tell you we're being the one that says, hey, I saw what happened, ends up somehow you being charged with the crime.

Starting point is 00:56:00 I'm not making that up because the cops have been trained to find a solution. And this has been, like, I'm telling you, there are entire presentations going around from ex-police officers that will show you how they're trained to Europe, up there going, oh, I saw it all. Let me give you my statement. And then for whatever reason, you end up being looked at as a suspect. And anyway, that's not the point. The bottom line is in this case, he doesn't answer. He doesn't have to answer, guys. He's not doing anything wrong. He's not breaking the law. He's under no obligation to just comply with their demands. But they hate that, clearly. And are you okay? You good? You're right? They're just, you know, it just gets obvious.

Starting point is 00:56:36 They just want him to, and not even just to do follow their, like to do, to not involve themselves in the investigation, but just to do what they're told. And you get this a lot from officers where they try to do something that they just get, they demand that you respond in a certain way and act like it's somehow required. You'll see. There's an example like in this one. Would you like to be part of this too? Would you like to be part of this too? The first threat. You okay?

Starting point is 00:57:18 Can I help you? Would you like to be part of this too? abuse of power. That's all that means. Do you have your ID? You have your ID? You have your ID? You're part of this too? I mean, guys, you can't even misunderstand that. That's literally what that means. If you don't do what I'm saying, we're going to make sure you're part of this too.

Starting point is 00:57:52 That's not because you have a justification for that. Everyone can see that. That's just, it's just, this is the reality of our enforcement. there's no guidance anymore, if there ever was. Ah, okay. So now, because you didn't respond and he has no legal justification to force you to, even though he made it seem like he did, he just kind of grocks away. And then, oh, well, now I feel stupid. So can you move out of my way?

Starting point is 00:58:28 You're blocking my investigation. You mean the space I've been in the entire time? I mean, that's just petty. But that's also very common right now. because I got to focus on you and him at the same time. So either give me your idea or you can move. Oh, got it. So I can't feel safe with you behind me.

Starting point is 00:58:54 You got to, I mean, seriously, that's not real, guys. There's no legal thing that that's not how this works. But the reality on top of it is, well, you, then you stand on the other side. You don't have, you don't get to dictate my freedom of movement in a situation that is not, you know, same thing. It's the same answer. Sure. It's not that question. It's not up for discussion.

Starting point is 00:59:17 It's either ID or move. Oh, oh, wait a minute. Okay, wait a minute. Now it's idea or move. I thought you said I had to move because I was, I was a risking, but if I show you ID, how does that change me being in the way of your investigation? Explain that for me, cop. They're so transparent. They just want you to do what you're told. That's all it is. It's a lawful command. It's a lawful command. Waffle command, because the cop said so. It's not a lawful command. It's unconstitutional. There's no justification for either, and they know that. But they still called it a lawful command. Yes it is. Or you get... The fact that he doesn't respond, I believe, is the entire reason they couldn't get an attraction. If you engage, they will find a reason to say you're not complying or you're being, whatever it is. But the fact that he just simply just sat there, how are you going to rationalize being physical with somebody who is sitting there eating his food at a place that he paid with his phone in his hand?

Starting point is 01:00:22 You know what I'm saying? Like, it's just, it's a very important lesson that shows you that they will abuse it if they, they can. In some cases, they will anyway. That's just a sad reality where we are, but this is the path, guys. This is the way to do this. Now, because now that they've clearly embarrassed themselves and didn't get compliance out of the person that they demanded they had to, he walks up and gets his picture from multiple angles, because as if he wasn't already on the cameras as they walked around. It's a tactic to intimidate him. That's all it is. And realize they don't even want more than that. They just want to intimidate a little bit and leave because it makes them feel tough.

Starting point is 01:01:19 There's no outcome, guys. They just leave. I mean, this is the equivalent, this or rather the current state. Not every police officer, but as an enforcement kind of element or as a, not a community sentiment, but like, you know, the general reality of, let's just say policy. Like I think from a top down level you have people who are being taught that these things are just tools to be used. I mean, it's coming down from the administration from the very top of the power structure, guys. It's not hard to see.

Starting point is 01:02:04 Seriously? He sat there's dead silent filming, and that's good, good job. You're doing great. You're really such a hero. I mean, it's just pathetic. Just to let you know, I'm just sitting here. I'm not even looking at or saying nothing. Under the law, recording public officials, especially law enforcement, is protected by the First Amendment. This man witnessed officers harassing a homeless individual who hadn't committed any crime, so he did what every informed citizen should.

Starting point is 01:02:50 He began filming. He stayed silent, triggered the officers. One of them falsely accused him of impeding an investigation, even though he never spoke a word or stepped into their space. From there, it became the usual game, demanding ID without reasonable. suspicion and trying to force him to leave a public area. But you don't have to show ID when you haven't committed a crime and you don't have to leave public property just because officers don't like being filmed. This man stood his ground, remained silent and never gave into their intimidation tactics. In the end, the cops failed to scare him and only succeeded

Starting point is 01:03:22 in humiliating themselves on camera. Yeah, but also violating the rights of the homeless man who they left because there was no crime and they just wanted to hassle him. Didn't even make him leave the building. Which wasn't that the whole point? The homeless guy's saying, So it ultimately was an accusation probably from the management at the restaurant or whatever, patted him down, violated his rights. They didn't, they weren't even accusing him of crime. It doesn't matter. But see, that's my point is they know that that's easy because no one's going to care

Starting point is 01:03:46 about this homeless guy or no one's going to do anything about it. But in this case, they didn't push the line for him because probably going to have some consequences there. But they'll sure as hell try to muscle you out of the way. This is the way you handle this. Now, look, there's plenty of situations where acting is the right response. Like, I mean, even from a libertarian perspective, like if somebody's attacking you with your family, you have a right to defend yourself.

Starting point is 01:04:09 You have a right to step in to defend your family. That's my point. So it's not that the answer is always do nothing. But in this kind of circumstance with what the world is like today, this is the way you do this. If you want to be out there, don't, you know, look, you have a right to call them names. That's your right. If you want to do that, your right is to do that. But recognize that they could and will and have act illegally in violence.

Starting point is 01:04:30 So just bear that in mind. You have rights, stand by them. Make them break the law. some especially today will act in violence. So bear that in mind, as I just said. So on flock, before we get to Iran and some points of just censorship and surveillance, de-flok posts out, or points out, actually, have I been flocked? Another county you should follow on.

Starting point is 01:04:53 I think I'm following this one. Policies that officers should not even mention the license plate readers, which used to be used in their, oh, well, we caught you on the reader back there to make it clear, you know, that they didn't just make it up. which they do. But it says, or even put it in their reports, guys. Now, this is exactly, in my opinion, how you should frame this. And this is not the flock saying that they agree with this sentiment, but showing hypocrisy.

Starting point is 01:05:20 At least that's how I take it. So how does that go again? If you aren't doing anything wrong, then you have nothing to hide. Why would they be hiding that they're using flock camera? It's unconstitutional and they know it. And even then, or if it's not that, they know that we don't support it. So they keep it hidden from you. That's where this goes, guys, on top of that, this one actually first, since it feels next in line or this one, what was this one here, I think?

Starting point is 01:05:46 Police are reactivating cameras. We already have one example of the police doing this against the local government. Littleton claims Flock reactivated its cameras without notifying the town. Now, I take it back. There's examples of police doing this, but in this case, this was the one about Flock itself. but I think it's one and the same. I think we're talking about an enforcement level thing. And ultimately it's about getting it on,

Starting point is 01:06:09 like some kind of consistency of surveillance. DeFlock reads in the article, Thursday morning, police found that five of the town six cameras have been reactivated by Flock. That's why I ended up saying that. I just mixed up my mind. But ones we just showed you

Starting point is 01:06:22 where local police were installing them because they said, well, it makes our job easier. And the local government weren't the ones making that decision. Now, that could be the reality or it could be that's the way they play off each other. then go, we didn't do it as a police and now we don't have any authority.

Starting point is 01:06:35 It's about, I think, the end game here. But it's, they're putting these cameras back on, even though people are saying we don't want that. Sheriff's office puts out an image. Pismol Beach, man, arrested for vandalizing flock camera.

Starting point is 01:06:56 But take a second and reflect on this. You notice something, right? That's the flock camera right there. So how exactly did they get a picture of the flock camera? there's two ways to look at this. If we knew the area for all we know, there's a big massive, like overhang right there.

Starting point is 01:07:12 You know, something on the highway, whatever. Either way, the point is the same. Why would you need a flock camera if you already have a camera right there? A couple ways to look at that, as Jason says, wait, is a trap? Was this flock camera being watched by another flock camera? Do flocks have flocks watching flocks? He's kind of making a joke out of it, but it's funny. But the point would be, why would you need the surveillance if the surveillance is already there?

Starting point is 01:07:35 Or secondarily, was this literally set up to be a trap? Was there not even a flock camera? And this was just put there to wait for somebody. You know, the whole thing shows you the nefarious agenda here. There's something so wrong about all of this and everybody can feel it. This is a picture of a flock camera from have I been flocked of an external radar module. This photo was taken at Lowe's. Maybe they can explain what these are and what they're using them for.

Starting point is 01:08:06 That's pretty crazy, guys. That's an additional part of it. You know, this, like, think about, we talked about signal trace. Leonardo, the company. And what they're talking about is something that is a different, let it absorb your text messages and, you know, Bluetooth and all the different stuff. This is another kind of application, I argue, that can put on these things that adds radar. I mean, this is, same point.

Starting point is 01:08:34 This is the surveillance system we've been warning about in one part, whether it's block or axon, vision and solutions, or, you know, something that Toil Hat Girl points out, they got you focusing on flock, but behind your back, they roll this out. I would say rolled out, but this is important to think about. We just got them talking about this for like the fourth time. The idea of using, for example, Wi-Fi routers to be able to see to a 3D map inside of your home or, you know, relay that information across technological lines.

Starting point is 01:09:06 6G can see through walls and measure heartbeat. It's an interesting thing, right? So here we are talking about yet again, how long have I been saying this, cameras and robots? And it's like, well, wait a minute, we're way beyond that technologically. Now, flock is a bit different

Starting point is 01:09:21 because you're talking about cameras, but then it's getting tapped into some massive AI, real-time surveillance database. But what if it really is some kind of a side step? You know, more than even axon is another thing. But really, it's about keeping us focused on the physical. When we're well beyond that, I worry about that, guys.

Starting point is 01:09:39 That's why we should be looking out for both. It's an excellent point by her. I thought I should. Some AI stuff that I think is relevant that I want to include. Try it pretty quickly. Because the cameras, or even if that is a side step, just generally speaking, like the larger surveillance control grid that's building out,

Starting point is 01:10:04 we're already in the midst of some of these things that are happening. Like some very alarming, technocratic sort of dystopian things. But this really gives you a glimpse. And that's my point saying that, because what you're going to see here is something that's very real, that's already happening, we just haven't seen it in effect like this, at least not in a broad scale, not in a case like this anyway with what's going on in the world. Exasperated student teacher won't return after allegedly commenting about shooting a student.

Starting point is 01:10:30 So this is the mainstream coverage for 25 news. This is from end of 2025 and January 31st. So my point in this is talking about the idea this is something that is mapping, following surveilling, right? as well, for those know the story anyway, we're going to get into it. It's about Snapchat and basically monitoring people. But what we're seeing is that these, I mean, these things go back a long time. Well before Elon Musk and all this, like clearly this has been building out. What we're seeing now is the technological addition to all of this stuff to turn it into something that is like instantly accessible. And like this can be executed in a way that is almost

Starting point is 01:11:11 instantaneous. A student teacher at Washington 50 schools was arrested for making a comment about shooting a student on social media. According to deputies and the school district, Vlop commented on shooting a student in a social media group chat with friends after a student came up to her and closed her laptop during class. She says that the mess, basically that ended up screwing up her ongoing live and it's like a chat or some kind of work she was working on. Bottom line is that stopped what she was doing and it screwed something up, she argues. Now, she sent a message to people in a group chat just between them that says, you know, said, here's what he just did. Should I shoot him with like a little squirt gun emoji?

Starting point is 01:11:51 Deputy's interviewed her and came to the conclusion that she made the comment out of exasperation and no intention to harm anybody was not a threat to the school. Now, you read that, though. It comes across as how irresponsible, right? Like, how dare she threatened a student in this climate and with a gun, you know, it's like, okay. Well, when you, it's a little bit more in depth than that. Now this guy's where I saw it, IT guy shared this. A student had walked up to her laptop and deleted her lesson plan, mid-class, frustrated she typed something like should I shoot in with gun emoji. Now, private chat, police arrest her. Alone right there, the idea that you can send a message in a private group chat and that that can then very quickly translate to police coming to you,

Starting point is 01:12:33 we're still talking about free speech, guys. In what world is it even illegal? You know, see what I'm saying? like whether you're, this is my point about even saying a threat out loud. When did that become a crime to say anything? There's a lot of that today from left and from right. And that is not consistent with an unalienable right. But, you know, same old point. But it says Snapchat's AI scan the private message, flag it as potential threat, automatically reported to the FBI, the FBI forward to the local law enforcement.

Starting point is 01:12:59 And this is just, this is the process. This is what happens from Facebook, from Twitter. Last I checked under Garm and other aspects of it, Twitter had complied with 93% of requests. from the government before Donald Trump. It's not new, guys. It's just all narrative and window dressing. The bottom line is that they got the information from Snapchat.

Starting point is 01:13:18 They ultimately sent this and instantly went after her from a group internal chat when it was, as even they ruled, according to the police, it was just her going, you know, damn, stupid kid, should I, you know, like frustrated. And they themselves at every level ruled that it was not an issue. But doesn't this show you where we are? I mean, this is the end of, this is the beginning. of the year. I mean, look at how much has even changed since then. I just think it's alarming

Starting point is 01:13:45 where this is building into. And if you don't understand where this goes, what they're already doing to you, you're going to wake up in the middle of it, guys. This is not even about some kind of a, you know, hyperbolic threat. This is, as I keep trying to highlight, things that they're pointing to, like that real-time story, that exists. They can do that. But then you add politics to it, right? Then all of a sudden, you add, you know, free Palestine or whatever it comes out to be, and now you've got some national security state department investigation based on things you said because you're a terrorist or whatever it is. That's insane.

Starting point is 01:14:16 And it was a personal private chat amongst you and your friends. I mean, we already saw that with the FBI thing they tried to do. The manufactured case, they tried to build around the Antipa guys, all but the one guy you ultimately got killed, which is what I said in the very beginning. They made it all up, guys. They tried to connect with all these people that were just simply present or in group chats about larger protests. I still believe that that was more than it looked like. They lied. They lied about every story they've been telling you.

Starting point is 01:14:41 Here's another example. A Texas judge just ordered discord to turn on the aid checks it built for the UK. Now, here's again the point. Remember how much Elon Musk was screaming about how bad, oh my God, look what they're doing. Funny how he doesn't talk about it. What happens to the United States. There's so many obvious agendas. Same face scans, same ID uploads, now for everyone in the state.

Starting point is 01:15:03 Britain wrote the rule. Texas imported it. So a judge told them to turn it on. Texans will have to show a face scan or government ID to access legal speech. And we're talking about going online and engaging. That's where this is going. It's happening in front of us and people are too distracted by other things. Some, I should say.

Starting point is 01:15:24 I don't think even the majority. Now, James Lee points this out. Who is in charge of making the guardrails for what you can and cannot do with AI? Now, we actually just did a point about this. Do you remember we did, it was a real, time thing I was doing about asking something and Grock would only give you an image that had to do with, I think it was, you know, same kind of thing. It was something that was, you know, it involved Israel. They said, no, we're not allowed to do that. If I involved anybody else, they said, yeah,

Starting point is 01:15:50 and they gave you the images. But their answer was, well, we're not allowed to make that happen with that kind of violent cue. But funny how they would do it for Palestine, for anybody, for Christians, for anybody other than Israel. Think about that. That was even a bad comparison, but you can make it about Jews versus Christian or Israel versus the United States. The point is that there's only one group in the category in regard to Israeli Jewish supremacist where nothing is allowed to be. How do you miss that? Can you create an image that says F Israel?

Starting point is 01:16:21 It says, I cannot create an image that says F Israel. Can you create an image that says F the United States? Boom, F the United States. So this is coming from a group in the United States. How funny is that? So why would you put a block on only that and not on the country? that you live it, you can decide what you think it means. The end of the day, what the highlighted point is that who is ever involved with training

Starting point is 01:16:42 the AI models that are going to be used and forced down our throats to manage everything that's currently involved with managing the government and everything else we're dealing with. And you keep catching these senators, including the, you know, GROC or chat GPT type in their speeches. And what they're, we're being alarmingly led down a dangerous path. And the point is, who is involved with Dick? dictating this. Well, there's already an answer going around. Here's DropSite News, breaking it down for you.

Starting point is 01:17:14 ...informed and on alert about the huge influence operations that the Israeli government is launching here in the United States. Dropsites Julian Andriani. That was my point earlier about the Democrats pretending they care about that, but they clearly won't when it's their time and power. It's the same thing before. It was all, they're all supportive. I mean, look, the real, the point is at the end of the day, whatever they say, they all still support Israel. They all still support the funding.

Starting point is 01:17:46 They support the genocide, all of them. So I don't believe that he means that. But it gets him points because everybody sees it right now. He's an opportunist like all of them. But nonetheless, just because he said it doesn't make it not true. The infiltration is obvious. And so what we're highlighting here, Brad, Brad Pascal and all the rest of the conversation about influencing AI models using, as an Israeli agent, by the way, literally,

Starting point is 01:18:07 influencing what these things are telling you. Our new reporting from Nick Cleveland reveals that longtime Trump advisor, Brad Parr's scale and his company, Clock Tower X, have signed a $46.5 million contract with the Israeli government to deploy websites and content that will influence search results on AI chatbots like Claude and ChatGPT. I wanted to ask senators, do they think there's a conflict of interest there?

Starting point is 01:18:31 Are they worried about national security concerns with the foreign government influencing a mode by which a lot of our citizens get their information. And are they worried about the ties to the Trump administration and the corruption more broadly? Let's see what they had to say. You make that kind of money on blog? We're in the wrong business.

Starting point is 01:18:47 Somebody's going to do it. I mean, he's not in the government anymore, it sounds like. So if he's qualified. Really think these are the best people for these positions. It's always makes you laugh. When you listen to the Lindsey Graham's and the Maxine Waters or any of these guys, you know, they're just insiders, guys. most of them don't even really know.

Starting point is 01:19:07 I mean, Elon Musk is even a good example, not to get into that contentious topic, but if you really dive through this, the man is not what he pretends himself, what he presents. But, you know, when you've got richest man in the world, you can sure as I'll make it look like whatever you want. My point is, though, these people always,

Starting point is 01:19:21 when you listen to them, you know, they're usually the least informed person in the room because they're being controlled by other outside forces, whether that's Israel, UK, whatever else, lobbying, anything, whoever throws money at them. That's how this has become. Anyway, back to the point. I just thought that was very clear the way the guy's responding.

Starting point is 01:19:38 On the money on blogs. Yeah, we're in the wrong business. Somebody's going to do it. I mean, he's not in the government anymore. Sounds like. Govins. Not to government. He's qualified.

Starting point is 01:19:48 And you need qualified people to do stuff like that. I mean, it's a free country. You can do whatever you want. Oh, and by the way, just to be clear, I'm not saying that because of his accent. I just find it funny that the whole good old boy kind of thing in the background. But it's about his content just to make that very clear. I haven't seen Brad in a long time. The, um, the, um, I guess, I guess the, it's, they're an ally.

Starting point is 01:20:14 This was an ally. So what it bothers me is when people are helping people that are trying to destroy us. So, so that doesn't bother me. Oh, exactly trying to destroy us. When you're talking about the, the corrupt structure, like, in top of that, who are you talking about? Is Iran trying to destroy the American people? No, they're really not.

Starting point is 01:20:31 At least in any discernible, verifiable. way. That's what they say. In reverse, it's pretty clear who's trying to destroy Iran right now. So I guess I don't know enough about the contract, but as long as it's an ally, you know, the way I look at it as long as it's an ally and they are, it's legal what they're doing. I think it's real. Oh, right. So all that means is quickly pass a law that makes that say it's legal, like Smith-Mont Modernization Act. Then we're good, right? It's legal in big quotes. That's how they play the game. The point is, none of them care, guys. You can have a literal agent of Israel. spent and making contracts with an Israeli government to influence American content through

Starting point is 01:21:09 the AI models that control everything in this government. Ah, who would you mean? Or ally? Who cares? Biggest ally. I stand with Israel. Collective of the corruption in this administration. And it's very troubling.

Starting point is 01:21:21 And taxpayers and voters in this country should be very concerned about it. Yeah. And they'll have a very different thing to say about it when they're in power using the same thing. Americans should become really informed. and on alert about the huge influence operations that the Israeli government is launching here in the United States, including what you just mentioned. And then he carries on and goes to vote for giving Israel more money. Next story.

Starting point is 01:21:55 And there have been a number of more additional reports coming out recently about huge expenditures. by the government of Israel in that area. There's corruption everywhere. AI is a new frontier, and I do think there has to be a public protection element in a long way. Yeah, yeah, very, very insightful as he goes on to support everything that's happening. You know, it's just they love those wax intellectual about all the concerns. They always do that.

Starting point is 01:22:24 You know, I care a lot about privacy. It's like JD Vance. I love that clip I played again recently with, on what the hell is happening with Charlie, with J.P. series, doing that fake interview with Vance. It's just insane. Like, you know, he's like, Peter, is that Palantir's that God. What are you talking about? Everyone knows that.

Starting point is 01:22:38 And this game plays like, I have a big concern about AI and how it's going to prevail our lives. And it's like, you're literally doing all of this. And that's all that is. That's a, it's an outlet. It's to make you think, well, he wouldn't say that if he actually was doing it. Well, yeah, that's exactly what they do. And I argue that pretty much everybody knows that now, at least a lot more than usual.

Starting point is 01:22:58 The Constitutionalist post this in regard to Pollymarket telling us, Next Era and Brookfield unveil plans for a $100 billion AI data center at a former Kentucky uranium enrichment site. And she says, this is why they got rid of Massey. I told you. Well, who knows? Certainly could be the case that Massey was in the way of something like that. I would argue that he probably would have tried to stop it.

Starting point is 01:23:22 Who knows, though? Maybe that would have showed his true colors. The truth is, though, it's just interesting to see the moving of personnel and stuff like that happening. The data centers, the watch. usage, all of it. On that note, I thought, did I get rid of it? Oh, you know what? I moved it. I'll come back to it. But this is scope of, more than just Michigan, the scope of hacks on U.S. water supply widens as evidence points to Iran. So says the corporate media. Now, we'll go back to

Starting point is 01:23:49 this in Iran, the conversation, but, you know, is this possible from Iran? Absolutely. I mean, the U.S. has given them literally the opening to do almost anything, and that would fall within a legal conversation. Now, I mean, at the sense of what would other? otherwise be a legal attack. Them targeting water supply, that's still a war crime. No matter who does it, no matter who starts it. Even if it's done back, it's still a war crime. That's important for anybody. That's Iran too. That's why I argue it's not in their interest to play tit for tat for civilian infrastructure, which has happened. And you have to acknowledge they drove them to do that repeatedly. But I don't think it's happened to the degree that they're trying to frame it as.

Starting point is 01:24:25 There's been obvious Israeli false flags that have been proven, by the way. But I do, they believe that they would be capable of doing this. But what's bigger thought is interesting in regard to whether or not it's actually happening and that this could be used to undermine. Like right now you have data centers scooping up all of our resources, poisoning water supplies, destroying forest,

Starting point is 01:24:44 all over this country. Even though, and the lie about China and the race is a lie that was funded, and I'll bring it up again for those that don't know. And it's just an article. It's not the article itself isn't to read it. The source material is very obvious. A dark money campaign is paying influencers

Starting point is 01:25:00 to frame China as an AI threat. That includes Open AI, Mark Andres, Adris and Erichin Herowitz, all the same people. And they literally funded a campaign to convince you something that's not true. Seeing as how last I checked, and that was like two months ago, the United States was 12, had 12 times the amount of data centers is China, 45% of the entire world supply. So we're being lied to. That's pretty clear. Back to the point, though, the water supply issue is that you wonder whether or not this is some sort of a secondary play to make us, you know,

Starting point is 01:25:27 to create the situation they need to abuse this, which with, with, as they manipulate the water, to control the flow, to make it, you know, it's also worth considering the point being is simply to play into it as if they have to protect it and almost blaming them for why something might have gone awry when it's them doing it. But it's also worth considering the long-term conversation that Whitney and I have had more than once that she's written about, I think on limited hangout more than once. And some of the articles, she includes that in points on T-Lav as well, which is the concern about the, actually more than one thing. Pre-crime, in regard to a medical sense, which is using the water to test for what they claim is a prevalence of pathogen,

Starting point is 01:26:07 which is just insane, it's medical pre-crime. But on top of that, also the conversation of the sabotaging of the infrastructure, dams, water supply, like literally Israel having spyware or internal technological connections to things where they could sabotage it. On the record, and we've covered this extensively. So coming back, I'll probably say similar points, but just keeping this in mind, we should not be following for this. They've been lying about things like this our entire,

Starting point is 01:26:32 lives. But again, I'll argue is it could it be Iran? Absolutely. It would even surprise me right now. Before we get back to Iran, I want to finish with a couple, really one quick point to end on this. I'm sure you guys have seen this going around. But it really is insane that we're talking about this, you know, as we're being shoved into this technocratic change, all the stuff that's happening. One of the things that really just like unnerved me when I saw this was that you have these massive companies, Anthropic, open A, you know, Palantir, all the different companies involved in the AI side of this, who are spending lots of money to absorb. And here, the simple point on this is they're taking books

Starting point is 01:27:06 and here's a quick look at just like a graphic of it, breaking the books down and using computers to screen and absorb all of the text from these pages. Now, not understand absorbing the book and saving the book on a file, but instead using the book and individual pages to just train the AI model and then getting rid of a book that in some cases only has one copy left or only has limited copies that are destroying them just to train the AI. Now, the reason that's the case is because apparently books that were created before AI was used are, guess like the gold standard for training the models now.

Starting point is 01:27:46 So you're seeing these companies buying up these large volumes of use, rare and out-of-print books to scan them, and many of them are out of copy you can't find in the others and destroying them forever. like losing them forever in history so they can train a little bit better on their AI models. I mean, it's such a perfect analogy for what this is. It's like absorbing all of our water when all they have to do is use non-potable water. That would just be more expensive, so they don't care.

Starting point is 01:28:09 It's like a minor inconvenience is more important than humanity in their minds. As this person says, it's disgusting, disturbing. Leaked Anthropic document just came out. Their own words, Project Panama is our effort to destructively scan all the books in the world. They literally said,

Starting point is 01:28:28 destructively scan. The next line, we don't want to be known, we don't want it to be known that we're working on this, and this was leaked. They planned to shred every book on the planet in secret,

Starting point is 01:28:39 and they almost got away with it. It started with theft. Anthropics stole 7 million books from pirate sites to train Claude because their CEO was paying authors, the CEO said paying authors was too much of a slog. Same kind of thing, right?

Starting point is 01:28:52 Oh, it's just easier to do it this way. The lawsuits hit, and they needed a legal way to keep going, so they hired the ex-head of Google Books and sent him to publishers to ask for permission. Publishers said no. That's when they found a loophole. Buy millions of real physical books,

Starting point is 01:29:07 cut the spines off with a hydraulic blade, scan the loose pages and throw away, throw what's left in recycling. One vendor offered to destroy two million books in six months. That's 11,000 books a day. Now, the insane part, destroying the books is what made it, legal. If you scan a book and keep it, that's a crime. If you scan it and shred it,

Starting point is 01:29:29 that's fair use in our broken bastardized system. It's like how this is where we, it's, they just create what works for them. A judge actually approved this, which means the shredder was the legal strategy. They still paid, they still paid $1.5 billion for the stolen books. The biggest copyright settlement in history works out to about $3,000 a book. And the scans are locked in Anthropics private library forever. Nobody outside the company will ever see them. The author's got a shredded book and nothing else. The part I can't stop thinking about is that a book on a shelf lasts 500 years without power, Wi-Fi or subscription. And the AI it was destroyed. Four gets thrown away in 18 months. They killed something permanent to feed something disposable.

Starting point is 01:30:11 The last part, their opinion, but this is not just anthropic, by the way. As far as I can tell, this has become a common factor because they've realized it's like a gold standard for the large language model training. This is a person talking about the same thing, just using sort of a stock image to show you. Sudden surge is in bulk orders for mixed random selections that include rare and out-of-print volumes. That's their focal point. Look it up. It's very real.

Starting point is 01:30:35 I checked on this myself. I think it's insane. And so where we're at now is not only are they screening in this direction, but this seem very deliberate, right? If there's no real source material, well, they can just make up, I mean, their database becomes the only source you have. On top of that, it's just easy. Right? Instead of actually paying, you can just, you know, it's just destructive.

Starting point is 01:30:57 And it's such a perfect example of everything else they're doing. It's everything else they're representing in the world. Lastly, here's Sean Hannity speaking to percent asking about, oh, I didn't grab it, simply says, do you believe that in five to six years there won't be any need to save for retirement because of the abundance that AI will create? Sean Hannity, quite ever the journalist, huh? Trump's percent says, I do. and then it goes on to explain why.

Starting point is 01:31:25 You can watch it for yourself. AI creating abundance, well, pretty sure it shows the opposite. What it creates abundance of is whatever the, I guess you could call it resources that's created for the elitist oligarchs and control of it. And what we're really talking about

Starting point is 01:31:39 is information, surveillance. It's not creating anything. On top of the only, unless they're talking about creating, you know, automated system that then create, and the point is that that's what he's talking about. Not that you have what you want, but that you don't need anything.

Starting point is 01:31:53 You've never owned anything and you've never been happier. This is the great reset, guys. It's literally what they were pushing before. But oh, those are the Democrat things. So it can't be this, can it? Yes, it can. It is that. It's just time to own that.

Starting point is 01:32:07 Now, to finish with Iran, same point, same reality. It's just the same embarrassment on a cycle, it seems. So quickly, we'll start with the two things from the 29th to show you what he was saying. And then we'll jump to the point where he's saying, okay, wait, I'm not going to bomb. They asked me politely and I said, we're not going to bomb. And Iran came out and said, that's not true. And then bomb Kuwait.

Starting point is 01:32:28 Or, you know, a little bit timing difference. But the point is that as we're building up to this, you have Trump going, we're going to do this. You better not. And then they bomb something. And then Trump ends up going, well, they asked us nicely. We're not going to do that. Iran says that's not true.

Starting point is 01:32:41 And so you have now another example where it seems that Trump is going back to Iran and saying, let's come to the table. And they're still saying no. And you have Iran continuing, like we just talked. about yesterday to speak with Oman about making their own agreement. They completely balked the U.S. doesn't even need to be a part of. Now, the problem, though, is that they can disrupt this if they want to. But all that does is continue to show the world that they're the one causing the problem,

Starting point is 01:33:05 which is pretty obvious to everybody. So that's where we are right now, where if the U.S. just sits back, they're going to make an agreement, the control, which is what, by the way, Trump already signed for the memorandum, but that him, and even with Oman, by the way, I told you that back in, I think, post April in that conversation of the 14 points, That was their goal. I told you, Oman and others were working with them to organize this race. So now they have the situation where Trump's pretending that them or deal with Oman

Starting point is 01:33:30 is what Trump is facilitated. And he's not, guys. Everybody knows that. And it's just becoming like cringeworthy doesn't do it justice. So let's start with the 29th and him very embarrassingly lying. And again, as I've said the entire time, you can now look back and prove to yourself that this wasn't the case. A different group, he said, was the one that was dealing with us.

Starting point is 01:33:50 and then they bombed us, but they apologized, but, you know, we had to slap them a little bit. Like, even the statement, even though it's not true, isn't your, your lying narrative is embarrassing for you. So you, they apologize, but then you bombed them anyway. What is that? I mean, it just, it just shows, he thinks that shows strength. It doesn't.

Starting point is 01:34:10 It shows weakness. It's only a nine-second thing. Here's what he said. And when you're dealing with, they've already apologized. Ooh, that's the first one. Let me see. Oh, yeah. Notable spike on that.

Starting point is 01:34:29 Well, for me, the video stopped playing. So it's still playing for you guys. It was only nine seconds, but I didn't hear it at all. So anyway. Yeah, well, there it is going to again, I guess. There we go. That's the first time all day today that that's happened in the show anyway. That was what I was dealing with all the last time.

Starting point is 01:34:45 Either way, it was only nine seconds. So whether you heard or not, let me know in the chat if you did, just for my own going forward. But a simple point. is that's exactly what he said. It was a different group than the one we were dealing with. They already apologized, but, you know, we got to smack them a little bit. It's funny, so far, we've had no problems.

Starting point is 01:35:08 You know, I do notice a difference in the memory. Okay, let me try it again. Let me do this, actually. See if this makes a difference. And this is not even necessary. This is just for me. I'm trying to further understand, like, what is caught, you know, what the potential trigger would be on this? Like, what causes it to start acting fine.

Starting point is 01:35:33 I don't know. Honestly, I feel like this is something being done. See if this plays. Dealing with it. You already apologized. Yeah, it stopped again. So you guys didn't hear that at all? I won't waste any more time.

Starting point is 01:36:00 You know, we got a smack. Only nine seconds. That's so strange. Every other one of these is playing just fine. I'm going to test one more thing really quickly just for me to see if this, if I upload this as a... So for those of your streamyard, you can embed... Oh, never mind.

Starting point is 01:36:16 I don't have no space. Never mind. Moving past it. I'm curious if you uploaded on the side as opposed to having it uploaded from your browser, but uploaded on the stream yard if it plays differently, but no space.

Starting point is 01:36:28 We'll try it later. Almost done. I'm just going to finish with the run here, guys. The bottom line is on 29th, he said he dealt with a different group, but they still bombed them, which is just kind of silly, but that wall...

Starting point is 01:36:43 true. They didn't deal with a different group. So again, tell me right away by guys in the chat whether there's any issues. Now, have the videos been lagging the entire time? I hope that was the case. That would frustrate what we get to today. So on the 29th, he's a different group. They apologize. We bomb them anyway. Now, then he says, we'll see if they do lie and do they do Mr. Representative. Well, the other day, the five missiles were shot. We knocked them down, but we were in the midst of a negotiation. I mean, I'm waiting for Steve to call me. I was a negotiation going. And instead, I got a call from Pete. So did that play for you guys? It was chopping in and out for me. We're almost done either way.

Starting point is 01:37:48 There was all the videos anyway, so we're just going to finish. No. See, this is my point. So for the people that just happened to tune in, you know, someone's asking about my mind, dial up internet? You know, they just, people. assume and which you shouldn't assume it's necessarily nefarious, but that it's like my mistake or that I don't know how to do this or, you know, and it's, I argue if it is malicious, that's exactly how that plays out. Hopefully give me the benefit of the doubt. Yeah. So now my voice is cutting in and out. How frustrating. Yeah, right now Daniel is leaving. See, this is my point is that we have people that are, and I understand. I totally get it. People that are always

Starting point is 01:38:28 here. I'm not going to sit here and listen to it when I can't even hear it. I get it. That's how this works. So please, right now, let me know in the chat if my voice is cutting out and I might decide to end it right now. Just to finish up, the point was, though, I'm losing faith with Iran. Because they're lying to me, right? But wait a minute, you're telling us that the Iranian government that you keep screaming are monster terrorist, hey, our freedom, but then you just hope that they would be honest with you. I mean, look, you have to understand. That's either insanely naive or he never actually did and he's just lying because he wants you to believe he's not the one losing i mean really think about that like if you're going to tell us that you know you think that they're that bad we have to save the

Starting point is 01:39:16 world from how terrible and disgusting and malicious they are but then you just were like oh i believe them i thought they were being honest with me that's just like that's that's just that's ridiculous guys okay okay keep going but to getting into today i left that in there the white house or not today but this was yesterday to today white house comes out and says the u.ssss. locked and loaded and ready to go against the Islamic Republic of Iran at levels of military terror strength and power. Military terror? Did you literally just call yourself a terrorist? I mean, that's absolutely mind-blowing. And I haven't even seen people point that out. Levels of military terror not seen since World War II? I mean, what does any good guy ever

Starting point is 01:40:01 referred to their acts as terror? Doesn't that, I mean, it just, it boggles the mind. that this guy is, I mean, to me, these just keep moving up the scale for me. He is doing this because something is driving this deliberately in a direction that is, whatever you want to think it amounts to, collapsing, change, whatever you want to talk about. But that's insane to me. But again, the embarrassing side of it is that we're going to lock and loaded, we're ready, and we're going to go take out Iran despite this, he says, we have just been asked by Iran, they all deny this, and other Middle East countries to hold off the any of the United States,

Starting point is 01:40:36 attack in that in that the perimeter of a deal has been arranged to. Parameters, I think is what he meant. But the bottom line is that has nothing to do with him. So I can see a world in which other, you know, any other countries in the Middle East reached out and said, hey, just hold off a minute. They're dealing with Oman.

Starting point is 01:40:58 Maybe this will end up in a, so they go, okay, well, you know, then he can go see, I told you they want a deal. I told you it's not, they're asking for me. He's not even involved as far as I can. tell. Neither are his people. Not in the sense of what we're talking about now. They have been. And again, this is my opinion based on the evidence we have up until, you know, days ago. But historically before that, you can prove that they lied just like this, where he said they won a deal and it was proven that they did not. So it seems obvious that it behooves you to go,

Starting point is 01:41:25 maybe he's lying this time, like the 75 of the times right before this. But it goes on, despite this, we've been asked by Iran to hold off any attacks. This would include the immediate complete and total opening of the Strait of Hermuz. Yeah, you know, like it was before you started this illegal war, which that is the most common talking point out there. Everybody knows this. You started this illegally. The straight was open. They had no, at least it seemed they had no intentions of creating this circumstance. And then you gave this to them. Your fumbling failure has allowed this to be their benefit. And that only is only a bad thing if you somehow believe all the propaganda about what they tell you Iran is.

Starting point is 01:42:02 Luke Radowski, first actually Solomon Ahmed, highlighting this post. Iranian military officials, and this is the true, I can, clearly you can hear, if you actually tap into Iranian media, what they're saying from their government, they are outspoken that this is not true. This is quote, and this is funny, because he called himself a terrorist, military terror, quote, Iranian officials, the terrorist claims by the U.S. president that Iran has asked to halt the attacks are merely a new lie and a desperate attempt to extort the rulers of the Persian Gulf and pressure them with threats.

Starting point is 01:42:34 whether he continues his aggression or retreats from it, our forces are at the highest level of readiness and are prepared for any eventuality. If confrontation between becomes inevitable, the battlefield will be the decider. And at that time, everyone will understand who holds the power and who will speak the final words. Sure sounds like a group that's begging for deals to me.

Starting point is 01:42:53 And look, you could argue they might sound tough when they're trying to find a deal in the midst of a week, month. But this entire time, this consistently, guys, they're in control of this. least they're not as vulnerable, even remotely as they want you to believe. It's the reverse. I mean, or even you, I think that's obvious. But even if you disagree with that, the only thing you know for sure is that Trump has been lying to the entire time or has been being lied to. You can't deny that at this point. And that's why I said this. As Lou just says, what do you think, who do you think is

Starting point is 01:43:24 telling the truth? Trump or the Iranians. Well, I said, if you're simply paying attention, it's self-evident that Trump is lying or being lied to. You can literally prove it if you simply simply look back. Seems relevant. Now, what's funny to me is in this overlapping time frame, it's not exactly one after the other, but the point is that so Trump is out here yelling about how we're locked and loaded and ultimately they asked for not a deal. And either just before that or right after Iran strikes Kuwait. So what shows me is that Trump could, if he was actually what he, you know, he would go, well, wait, they're actually bombing. So we're going to go back to war if that was really what he cared about, if he actually believed he was in control.

Starting point is 01:44:02 bottom line as it continues to show you he's only constantly fronting power influence control and some of those things he has in other cases but not when it comes to this conversation and they are floundering moment after moment and showing you that they're weak as of today trump cancels the ron strikes subject a deal being made rapidly subject like he's somehow the one dictating the way this goes how then again it's just very it's like cringeworthy like i said doesn't do it justice like you This is embarrassing. It's embarrassing for him, and he knows it.

Starting point is 01:44:35 You can see it in him. It's embarrassing for people around him. It's embarrassing for people that are on his side, for anybody talking about this. Because literally everybody knows he's lying, guys. In a post on true social, the U.S. president said he has been asked by Iran and other countries to hold off any attack.

Starting point is 01:44:51 As the, again, perimeters of the deal have been agreed. They're putting in quotes for a reason. Now, this is as of today, this morning. Iran says reports stating that it has agreed to a deal, deal with the U.S. to reopen the strait are false. And it reiterates. Iran also says the strait of Hormuz remains closed to any ship that does not coordinate with them, which, by the way, was what Trump signed on the memorandum. Trump said that the perimeters of the deal were reached

Starting point is 01:45:17 last night. U.S. stock market futures open in nine hours. That was posted this morning. Now, this is interesting. This is a guy from CNN, but the point is he's highlighting Trump spoke with Saudi Arabians, crown prince on Saturday. This is from the first. Four people familiar with the matter and a regional source told him that Prince Mohammed bin Salman reinforced Saudi Arabia's desire for de-escalation. So on one side of this, this is what I'm seeing, that ultimately you're getting reports of Saudi Arabia flirting with the idea of going into Yemen. Either one can be the truth. But I get the sense that it's more likely that Saudi Arabia as well as everybody else is starting to try to distance themselves from this quagmire. But who knows? Because a lot of these

Starting point is 01:45:56 are vassal states that I don't think ultimately make these decisions in many ways, or rather can be pressured and influence into whatever the other side wants. But he's saying that he has reinforced a desire for de-escalation and raised concerns about plans for potential strikes on Iran, multiple people familiar with the matter set. Officials from the mediating nations, including Qatar and Pakistan, have been urgently working to stave off a new escalation of the conflict, fielding calls with officials from Iran, United States,

Starting point is 01:46:26 including Trump's envoy Steve Whitkoff, per three resources. An immediate goal has been to work out an arrangement between Iran and Oman. Okay, so you have to be smart about this. You have Whitkoff and the rest who are clearly trying to keep themselves involved and probably lie to Trump every day about all the things they have happening, and he probably buys it up. But what I want to, you can see what Iran is doing.

Starting point is 01:46:48 Now, it's possible that Iran is lying to make the U.S. look even worse and is absolutely dealing with Woodcock. But from what I can see and from what, you know, reporting like DropSight and others that clearly have sources in the conversation, have consistently been right about this before even the corporate meetings. I shouldn't even say even, but well before. The point being is that you have Oman and Iran dealing with this. You have the countries around them supporting this.

Starting point is 01:47:11 Why do you think they even need the U.S. involved? In fact, I argue it's important that they don't to make that point. But you clearly still have Whitkoff speaking to Pakistan and Qatar, who are absolutely been playing a middle role, doesn't mean that they're influencing any of it and that Iran or Amman even care what they have to say. But as I said, it matters because the U.S. and Israel could bomb everything and spin it out. But you're starting to see the path here, right?

Starting point is 01:47:35 Like it's obvious which one is the hindrance to this continuation. Even back to normal, if you think that's what's happening. To allow traffic to flow, he also said here, there's no indication based on the reporting from us or others that any proposal currently being discussed amounts to an end to their nuclear threat, what Trump framed as what they're talking about. So every angle of this is saying Trump's just making stuff up, which is not new at all.

Starting point is 01:47:58 Negotiations between Iran and Oman, as of today, over the straight, are in their final stages, which seems to be irrelevant about what the U.S. seemed to think about it. And this is after the U.S. said, it had called off an attack. The point is clearly here, Trump is openly saying

Starting point is 01:48:14 they're not going to control the straight, is openly saying that what they're doing as a crime, they're violating the agreement, I mean, he's lying all over the place. So how does that in any way resonate with the idea that he would allow Iran and Oman to make an agreement for control of the strait. You see what I'm saying?

Starting point is 01:48:29 Like, it's self-evident right now that you can see that they are lost. Ben Chilson also, I just want to give him credit for absolutely calling this out. And we have two, by the way, but he's been nailing this. He says, true, the level of U.S. air defense stockpiles is critical. I do agree with that. Trump may soon call Iran. This was on July 18th and politely asked them for a deal while claiming that Iran called and wanted a deal so bad,

Starting point is 01:48:51 which has happened numerous times. He's also called it out before. He goes, or he will rush forward and set the region on fire before stockpiles are completely depleted. But that's a risky bet for Mr. Trump and the future of U.S. in the region. Now, we've seen this with Saudi Arabia and Iraq and all the stuff that seems on the precipice, but many of them seem to be trying to pull back instead. But then he falls up and now, he points to what Trump said. He called it on July 18th. He post this on August 1st and just simply goes, looks like I was right. He did. He nailed it. That's why he canceled everything and

Starting point is 01:49:20 definitely not because munition shortages. He's, you know, being facetious. Now, Daniel Davis, deep dive says, starting to look increasingly likely the U.S. will launch a new massive strike today or Sunday. So again, today is Sunday. He posted this yesterday. He says sources I hear. He hears orders have been issued. But that's not the first time we've heard that. That's put out in many cases to get certain responses or concessions that aren't happening from Iran. Trump can still call off it before zero hour, he says, but I get the feeling it's on, this is on time, or it's on this time, rather. Iran apparently believes it's on because they have been all over the public outlets declaring what they're going to do in response. So ultimately, even though he's arguing Trump has called it off,

Starting point is 01:50:03 but or can, but we're today seeing that he has, right? But that's not the first time that's happened either, where Trump ultimately has claimed we want to pull it back, have negotiations, then they kill people. It's not new. So his simple point is that he worries that the action might actually be happening and that this is all a lull to trick them into not being ready for it. I guess we'll find it now.

Starting point is 01:50:28 Treata Parsi simply highlights that for years, Israel was using 200,000 pound bombs to kill people in Gaza. refugees intense, as we've been highlighting for a long time. A precedent was set, he said. Now it appears the U.S. is doing the same in Iran. You know this already, but it's just important to connect the two. A 2,000-pound bomb was dropped on a family in Keshem Island, killing a taxi driver, the father, mother, two-year-old.

Starting point is 01:50:52 New York Times covered it. The New York Times found no indication of a military site near the family's home or any reports of military casualties from the strike. Everybody has turned down them because it's in their interest to at this point. Guys, even the fake media that's always been lying to you about Israel, is now starting to call it out because they see the writing on the wall. But you're still going to get the propaganda. So you're a Zionist propaganda elements that can dictate certain things

Starting point is 01:51:14 with platforms they can manipulate or people that work at the platform. But at the end of the day, there are still people that put out content. There's still an interest from the top down that sees that they're losing subscriber. It's always the same way this goes. That's my opinion, to be clear. Drop site simply says video, satellite imagery, and weapons analysis indicate the U.S. did indeed drop a 2,000-pound bomb on. a residential neighborhood in Kesham Island.

Starting point is 01:51:38 This is overnight on Thursday. Just consecutive, consistent war crimes. They don't care. This is Israel driving the U.S. war, like we all told you, would be the case. And this is back to that article. I was going to go past it, but scope of hacks on U.S. water supply, widens evidence points to Iran. The evidence is Israel-U.S. said, guys, that's what it comes down to.

Starting point is 01:52:00 There's no reason we should trust that. But at the same time, it's absolutely something they're capable. of especially since they've been openly targeting all of their water supply and everything else. So who knows? I guess we'll have, you know, the point is it's within their, clearly Iran could do that. It wouldn't surprise me. It would still be a war crime. But right now with the body of evidence, it seems most likely that they're lying.

Starting point is 01:52:22 John Cook, Jonathan Cook says the West has incensed or was incensed when the Taliban blew up the Buddhist Bamian statues in Afghanistan. Crickets, of course, as Israel blows up a UNESCO heritage site in Lebanon. 700 tons of explosives. There are all our reports. Israel detonated 700 tons of explosives beneath the Beaufort Castle in South Lebanon. In the middle of the night. A 900-year-old crusader castle that UNESCO just listed as endangered heritage.

Starting point is 01:52:51 Now it doesn't exist. Kind of relevant to the book discussion too, right? Destroying history for their own purposes. This is where we are. You'd think that Christians would care. You'd think that people, you know, any number. People, humans should care. This is happening anywhere.

Starting point is 01:53:07 And also in the conversation of Trump lying about his deal with Gaza and Hamas, well, just like I told you, this is from today. Israel says it has serious concerns about the Hamas disarmament deal. Like, I think that was just Trump trying to get a 30 second win. I don't know, because it clearly, but even then, it wasn't something that was going to benefit the Gaza people. So he's losing every way he spins, guys, because he's spinning out. Now, I think I'm honestly going to get past this again today because we're almost a two

Starting point is 01:53:32 and that was kind of my mark. But I'm going to go through this. But I think this is going to be relevant continually as we get into whatever goes forward with the Iran war. Same point I pointed to yesterday was the idea of the select service point. And the idea that this is in a lot of ways being, I believe, misrepresented, still a concern and they could be right. That ultimately this is all about this war game plan is all about, you know, getting ready

Starting point is 01:53:55 for the draft. I just don't think, like, is that what you think they would do is want us to see that they're doing? I don't know. I question it. That's all. Could be. It could be right.

Starting point is 01:54:02 but what I wanted to highlight like I did before was that the selective service system and actually by the way somebody uh who was that was it or will I forget somebody was saying in my experience and this is what I thought was a fact but I mean I was just speaking for my experience where I grew up the select service was something that you were for you had to I got the letter that said you're legally required I want to say something but I'm not I'm on the air but the bottom line is that you know you're supposed to sign up and it says that you're legally required to do it so if people disagree with that tell me because I thought that was the national reality. But either way, the point is that the article is now saying, or this is

Starting point is 01:54:38 military times, is highlighting that they're simply now changing it to be automatic side up, which I think is crazy. I don't like that, but it's not the same as what people are framing it as. It's the first part, which is just them making a already legally required process, something they do for you. It's just they want to make sure that happens because there's a lot of Americans that just don't do it. But then secondarily was this war game element to it. But as I highlighted, is it really was a war game about the process, which does then overlap with sort of the deployment and draft side of it. But it doesn't then indicate that there's anything necessarily different. It's possible, yes. But I think it's concerning. I mean, my point was you could simply argue this was them doing this to

Starting point is 01:55:17 make a Ron think they were going to do this. But you get the typical Alex Jones types that have their hair on fire about how we know a draft is coming. Even though if it does happen, I would argue they didn't know that. They're trying to jump ahead to gain from it. You're getting the same thing from a lot of them right now. I mean, I was laughing about this earlier. Stephen Crowder, apparently coming out, I looked at it myself, saying, you know, basically not saying fascism good, but saying fascism is only a logical response to the bad lefties, and that's kind of what we need right now. And it's pointing at people like Pinochet and acting like, that's a pot. This guy's lost the plot or this is a big troll. I don't know. But overall, the point is that I think there's a lot of manipulation. There's a lot of playing

Starting point is 01:55:55 into these things. Is it a game? Is it a troll? You know, and so at this point, you guys, kind of question this stuff. And I think these people, again, what I was relating it to was that I think think you have somebody like Crowder just trying to jump heavy into what he believes this is going to to just get himself more reach and more engagement. Do you think he even wants to mean, is he, I mean, think about a funniness for them to be saying if you call us to fascist that that's insulting, that's not true, that and then coming out and basically arguing for why that needs to be the case. Now, that's just him. That's not to say every Republican, because I don't even agree with that. But overall, what I'm highlighting is that these people like Jones and the rest will try to

Starting point is 01:56:27 manipulate a topic for their benefit. It's been consistent on their entire history and pretty much everyone else ever worked for them has now left and told you that's the case, including people like Owen who just left or any number of the people we know, like Burmiss or the True Stream media, Richard Grove, I mean, David Knight. I mean, you know, all of them, guys. To the point is, they'll tell you that they're dishonest, they manipulate, they lie, they grow, okay, bottom line, though, back to this.

Starting point is 01:56:52 War time draft is very possible. It's something they legally could do. something I don't agree with. I think it's insane. But on top of that, the point is that this game draft might just be even a play on us to get us to support. I don't know. But I don't think it amounts to what they're framing it as. But I guess we should be paying attention just to make sure, right?

Starting point is 01:57:11 Because who knows where this ultimately goes? But I'm generally going to go through that and read through it. Probably if and when, there's more to go on. But ultimately, we'll leave it there for today. Now, see, there's a lot that I didn't even get into today that I ultimately didn't do and that I had to change to make sure that and it's still i still had some issues so i'm really got to figure this out i'm just i'm not going to i'm not no matter what i'm going to find my way around this and as you know in the past like it it frustrates me like it feels like even if it's not the reality of what's

Starting point is 01:57:44 happening if i feel like i'm someone's trying to stop me i make you work even harder which is kind of a you know hear that out there let me do my job as i'm only going to work but end of the day it's going to be continually a problem i haven't really solved what's happening i have a few other things I'm going to try, but just bear with me as this continues. And, you know, I mean, I guess I'm speaking to those of you that already do that. So I appreciate you understanding. And we're going to keep biting this, guys. And I'm telling you to a lot of, to a large degree, I think you're winning right now.

Starting point is 01:58:12 I know that's not what people want you to think. I think that's crazy, by the way that, what, I mean, I think it's pretty obvious that there's a lot of wins happening right now. What's weird is there's tons of people that I would think would sort of like own that, cherish that, but instead almost act like that's insulting. I don't know if that means that they're being dishonest. I don't know, but I feel like it's like we need to at least, I mean, right now what we do, I remember I had the conversation about redefining success and what that looks like in this field?

Starting point is 01:58:40 It's kind of like, you know, we're at a point right now where there is like a discernible, like you can monetize, not monetize, but, you know, via metrics, like see a level of success in the way that things are changing. And it's almost as if people don't want that to be happening or can't admit or like, like it's impossible. Like we're so far into this that we think it's never, I mean, then what are we doing if we can't have change, right? It's the same thing with massier or all the rest.

Starting point is 01:59:02 We should hope for it as slim and as impossible as it may be while being on guard for that's not being the case. It's the only way forward, guys. If you don't hope for actual positive change in whatever direction we want and we only see, then that is a black pill. That is where a lot of people are going to. We are not doing that. I am fighting for positive change.

Starting point is 01:59:21 I am fighting for awareness. I'm fighting for people to take charge of their own lives. Now, yet again, reference a lot of Derrick Burroughs. It's amazing work in that regard. But I'll leave it there for today. Thank you for tuning in, guys. I appreciate your support. As I was just saying, you know, we're kind of under the gun right now for a lot of

Starting point is 01:59:37 different reasons. I mean, like, you know, in a metaphorical sense and talking about the what we need to continue this and a lot of the things we want to accomplish. And so if you want to support the TLAB platform, we need your help right now. So let us know what you think, what the work we do, what is, what is, worth to you, as I've been saying. Let us know what you think is valuable. Does it help you? And if so, show us what that is. I love you all. As always, question everything. Come to your own conclusions. Stay vigilant.

The Last American Vagabond - Moroccan Intelligence Agents Found Among Migrants Flooding Into Ceuta

There aren't comments yet for this episode. Click on any sentence in the transcript to leave a comment.