The Last American Vagabond - New Moderna mRNA Flu Shot & Trump's Iran Deal Breaks Down Due To Lebanon and US Blockade Violations

Starting point is 00:00:01 It starts with a simple question and ends an objective reality. Through our journey from there to hear, we find one another and ourselves. And as the next 24 hours breaks free from our last, we gaze onward in reflection of the day. Tell me your own. Welcome to the Daily Wrapup. Friday, June 19th, 2026. Well, here we are. After all the conversation and all the time is the ups and downs of this run conversation.

Starting point is 00:00:50 And yet again, here we are following the conversation to the days where we can look back and recognize that we were being lied to. And I just think it's really important to reiterate this for those that may just be kind of, you know, after watching kind of passively what's been happening through corporate media, thinking that we may be close to something. and admittedly where this is is closer than it might have been when it first started, but to understand that it wasn't some kind of prophetic vision to see that the Lebanon issue and the blockade would be the reason this didn't happen, at least as of right now.

Starting point is 00:01:23 And that is in no way to suggest that we're the only people that saw that. Anybody paying attention since April, as we've been talking about, at the very least, would have been aware that Iran, at the very least, has been saying that they only want certain things. And then you get a lot of nonsense from Trump, or at least, you know, what I would perceive as narrative and propaganda. Both sides are playing their games. But every single time, you would see Trump come to the table and ultimately not reach the agreement that he said they had to because they were weak and they had nothing and they were going to surrender. And Iran stands there and says, we still want these same things. There's only so many times that can happen in a row before you

Starting point is 00:01:58 recognize somebody's lying to somebody. Like the Axios example is so humorous to me that you can have a group that gets it wrong 20 times in a row and that somehow not only doesn't hurt their platform it seems to grow in influence how do you not understand what that shows us today they keep telling you misinformation they keep benefiting from it because that's their job i argue but the point is that we're now at the let's not even to say a conclusion we're at a point where this has still yet to conclude but the information we put out before is reasonably still up to date all we're going to talk about today is what has happened since over the last couple of days in regard to the Iran back and forth and how you can clearly see that Trump is either not in control the situation

Starting point is 00:02:41 and Israel is the one guiding the entire thing, which has always been one of the possibilities because Lebanon has continued to be bombed as of right now. In Ron's mind, that is a violation of the memorandum understanding, not even a deal yet, just the outline of what that deal might have looked like, excuse me. So today we'll go through those few last days and again, showing you that it appears to me, based on the facts in front of us, that this is something that Trump, and through whoever seems to be guiding this, the Trump's administration's agenda, Iran is utterly failed. That's not to say that there can't be some follow-up extreme action out of desperation, but who knows what that might lead to, but in this moment, it's very clear to see that they've been

Starting point is 00:03:23 lying about where they currently stand, munitions, defense, everything. And that Iran has basically gained everything from the situation. I mean, this is, I shouldn't even need to repeat all this, but just in case people need to hear it. Before we started this, the straight was open. Now, the argument is that it's open, therefore, Trump won. But now Iran has gained control over that, including a toll, which is no different than most every other passage in the world in the world. Now, Iran is now able to sell oil again. The sanctions are arguably going to be removed. There is money flowing in their direction. And we'll get into the nuance of this. The lies coming from both sides, but none of this is even disputed anymore. It's just nuance around those points.

Starting point is 00:04:02 All the points that before, I mean, like a week ago, Trump's administration was saying were fake. And now we're watching it play out. It doesn't take a special kind of intelligence to be able to put those two pieces together and go well. Trump was either lying right then or he was being lied to. And as always, I keep asking the question of why that would continue, but that's for you to decide. But it's important to see this, though. As much as it may seem irritating and confounding. And by design, I argue, it's important to see where this really is and how increasingly this shows you, you know, at the very least, not who is in control. I think it points in that direction, but it definitely shows you who is not.

Starting point is 00:04:36 And that needs to stand out, I think. But we're going to talk about a few other things before we get to that today. A shot that is being created, not yet approved by the FDA, which is an important point from Moderna is another MRI flu shot. Right on its heels is the MRI COVID combination shot. Both are in the works, still being fun. by the U.S. government. It will technically, I'll get to that in a second.

Starting point is 00:04:59 Technically, right now it is being made by Moderna. I don't want it to be heard at the beginning of the show, misinterpreted that Trump and his administration are the ones behind it. That's not the case. But I'm going to get into why I think that will be the case and where ultimately this is the continuation of whatever side you think you're on of our government and this industry going forward in the same thing, the same COVID-19 direction, the same MRI direction,

Starting point is 00:05:22 everything. And so what's frustrating for somebody like me is that even as you just heard me describe it to start, we all know that there's these caveats and catches for a lot of people that make it partisan. For me, I only care about the fact that Moderna is making a COVID shot, or rather an MRI flu shot, but at MRNA and is also COVID shots. And the industry hasn't been penalized for any of the things that we know that they were responsible for. Neither side of the government has. Nobody involved with the not Fauci, not anybody.

Starting point is 00:05:50 So what's confounding that we have to try to work through partisanship, even as it, I think, should be obvious to everybody. This is not a partisan issue. Both sides are still making COVID job. It's important that we know that. As well as a few other things we'll get into that I will include just for relevance, I think. One important story actually that I just Derek put out today that I want to make sure we see

Starting point is 00:06:09 that we'll probably be talking about more, possibly with Derek and interviews. And this is a story that I think is only going to get more attention around the, I think it's Ridglin Farms and the Beagles. But in this case, it has to do with animal experimentation on kittens and cats and other dogs. and that is still happening under Trump's administration. Just one more example of where we are. Now, I want to start with this clip because it really is kind of amazing to me that this is being stated so obviously. And people make question rightly so whether that means that it's almost a troll, you know, try to play people out there.

Starting point is 00:06:43 You listen for yourself and then I'll comment on what I think about this. What have you learned about not just the exercise of power, but the limits on your power as a result of the conflict? There are no limits. No. No, not, I haven't learned that lesson yet. I know there are, but, you know, there are no limits. Now, that's just a quick small clip from the Axios show, whatever that is. Axios, keep that in mind.

Starting point is 00:07:06 But it's not edited. I check this for myself. It's not out of context. You can watch the full interview. It just makes you, why would he say that? And so the obvious reality is there, that's not the truth. There's not, this entire system is built, whether it's honest or not, on the idea. on the idea that we tell ourselves

Starting point is 00:07:24 that there's checks and balances, that no one entity, no one group, no one branch has unlimited power. No Article 2 argument. These things are all, it's, it's almost, the bottom line is that's not true. And there's so many verbs, the point is that we have examples of people

Starting point is 00:07:40 who are being played because they don't understand the most basic ideas of the things that they otherwise support. So I don't like to get into the game of insulting people for not understanding things, but that's really what ultimately is happening. Because these things are very easy to understand.

Starting point is 00:07:51 In fact, contradictory. When you read through the very document, they cite for their power all ending, you know, and all be all power. But in this case, he's saying that he doesn't have any limits. At least he hasn't bumped up against them, despite numerous examples of pushback by other parties, by the Supreme Court, and in many cases, losing those. So literally bumps up against that. So my opinion on this is not that this is Trump genuinely thinking that or maybe not, I shouldn't say it like that. This is him, I think this is Donald Trump saying this because he is. not in control.

Starting point is 00:08:24 Because he's in a position where Trump is in, in most circles, the one that at least he feels he's in the control of every situation. He's the most powerful person every room. Watch in the G7 and says, I'm the boss, whether a joke or not. That's the person we're talking about. And so I think it's important to see that he is in a lot of ways that influential. He has a lot of power. He's the president.

Starting point is 00:08:43 But there's many examples we're seeing today in this country more than anything where those things are being challenged, like the understanding that that's not the full picture when it comes to the global discussion. You can go back to the Rothschilds and his bailouts for a number of things to see that Trump isn't as independent as many like to frame. To me, this is him stressing the idea that he wants you to think that because that's important for his persona. I call the shot. I'm the one, he says about Netanyahu and then Netanyahu goes on to do what he wants. That's pretty embarrassing, right?

Starting point is 00:09:13 So here, when he stresses, I have no limits. There are no limits. That's because I think that's what he wants people to think about where he is. Probably because internally he's battling the idea that he absolutely has limits and those people create them for him. Completely my opinion. But it's strange. Isn't it to have him just state that knowing that he's being critical? He's not that stupid.

Starting point is 00:09:33 He understands that that's something that'll make him look like the very power hungry person they claim he is. So I just think the reason I'm even going into this to start, there's this interesting dynamic right now between the, I guess, America first, actually Israel firsters that everyone is really seeing between the divide of it. the Iran conversation, and then the people that whether you agree with them or not, whether you think they're Maga Nazis or whatever the partisan game is, are America first in their minds and not at the expense of, or rather not for Israel at the expense of Americans. There's a very clear difference there. And they're noticing that difference when they go, but wait a minute,

Starting point is 00:10:07 you guys were just telling us that we needed to go, you know, this is about America first and freedom. And now Trump tries to end it, and at least he claims he won. And you guys are calling him not America first because it doesn't suit Israel. It's becoming undeniably clear. So I think that's why this is important because we see this weird schism between all of this, or other, you know, that Trump in his own persona is part of that, that he is powerful and he

Starting point is 00:10:30 is leading the, you know, but at the end of the day, knows that he doesn't actually call out of these shots. You'll see more of this we go through today. I personally find just a statement very interesting. Here is our last, or the last episode we did yesterday, which was what the hell is happening with Charlie Robinson. And I thought it was a good conversation. We get into a lot of the kind of updates of some of this in regard to the Iran discussion.

Starting point is 00:10:50 We also talk about Austin Franco, free speech, and a bunch of other things that are happening. Always enjoy this. Next one, a couple weeks from now, another one with Charlie. Just a couple opening points I wanted to include. You saw this. We talked about this from the Intercept. The top Pentagon official admits boat strike may have killed victims of human trafficking. Meaning the boats, they were bombing without process.

Starting point is 00:11:11 I don't know. Might have accidentally killed innocent people. Shocking, I know. Absolutely shocking. Despite the fact that we've already proven more than once, the people within these boats were not everything they said. They were, it's irrelevant, though, because, you know, national security or whatever they scream, and this is where we are, left and right.

Starting point is 00:11:25 That's where our government is today. The whole world knows this. But people like this are part of this game. They're, this, they're part, the team sport players. He writes, blowing up drug boat saves American lives, which, okay, let's just, we'll just say, for sake of conversation, that's somehow true. The only way you could prove that is if you somehow could directly connect the fact that you stop that boat from in some way, then going on to take American lives.

Starting point is 00:11:49 instantly, like running them over with their propeller. The idea that in any way, and this is very Trump of, like, and I mean specifically to him, not just necessarily left or right, but Trump has been a one to, he loves to make these grandiose connections to things that don't even necessarily make sense. To make it nonpartisan, I think both sides are equally stupid in their own special ways. It's just, this is Trump's special way. And in this case, he's the idea that you can put out through the government that by stopping these drug boats and then I guess because saying, therefore we know these drugs

Starting point is 00:12:19 kill X amount of people, which is in and itself an absurd thing to argue for a thousand reasons, but therefore because we stop those drugs, that therefore we know we save these lives, that is the same argument it makes during COVID-19. Look at how many saved lives we saved millions because we put out shots that killed people, which is the truth. But even if you argue they didn't kill people, the abstract ability to say these shots then went on to save this many lives, it's an absolute guess framed a certainty. In this case, the same idea.

Starting point is 00:12:46 Who's to say those drugs were even going to the United States? They don't know that. Secondarily, were they even drugs in the boats? Thirdly, what happens when they get to these locations? Do we then know that they get distributed out to everybody and freely given? Or are they then, you know, the point is the idea that you can map that to immediate death or just death at all is lazy. And this is Trump's effort or the administration to make it look like they're saving people while the world is starting to recognize that they're totally not. Then, in fact, they're hurting American lives.

Starting point is 00:13:13 In fact, they just killed far more than 13 people. that's the narrative, we're told, for a failure. But yeah, he saved all these lies by doing something that also killed innocent people, which was victims of human trafficking, while they pretend that they're totally going after human trafficking, while completely not letting you see all the Epstein files. But either way, drop site news adds to this in regard to Hegseh being the Department of War who loses his first war, which is the fun meme going around.

Starting point is 00:13:40 Senate threatens to freeze Hegss's travel budget over Iran school bombing. both strike videos. Now I kind of get the sense this isn't going to happen. But either way, the fact they have to feign that shows you that people are getting across. The average people are having an influence on at least what they want you to think they're doing. I know I'm jaded when it comes to government, but trust me, this is how it tends to go. Like my point being is they don't actually care, but the second that we start pressuring them, they need to look like they care.

Starting point is 00:14:05 And if you pressure far enough, sometimes they actually have to do something. That's how I think Congress works. Senate lawmakers are threatening to withhold 75% of Defense Secretary Pete Heggson. travel budget if the Pentagon doesn't turn over more details in the deadly February bombing of Iranian girls school and full videos of illegal strikes. Think about being in a situation where that has yet to have been shown. Something he admitted to. Something his own bombing map showed you they hit. Something Israel told you they hit. And we don't even have that information. These are criminals. Straight up criminals using their power to hide their crimes. Simple as that. And the reality is even

Starting point is 00:14:39 if they end up giving the videos of the Senate, how much you want to bet nothing happens. That's just my opinion of the where our government is, guys. They want you to feel you got, you know, you dunked on the Republicans. The same thing we're seeing right now in reverse. The idea that we made Heggseth look like the criminal he is, but nobody goes to jail. No, nobody has to find. But he lost his job and that's how, that's how the system works. No, in actuality, that is how it seems to work. Politicians can resign their protests and somehow crimes go away. If it even gets there. But I'm sure you can sense that I feel like this is only head fake, but either way, it's because people are calling out their obvious, obvious crimes.

Starting point is 00:15:14 But note that I think it's important to see. Things are shifting. Now, in regard to the idea of maha, which is something I wanted you to see as a continuing reality, just like with the MAGA side of this, the Maha movement are people out there that very much still believe all the things that RFK and Trump promised and failed to deliver on. The ones out there still pretending that Trump and RFK represent Maha aren't actually Maha, because if they are, they would recognize that they're not doing what they promised.

Starting point is 00:15:40 That's like one plus one equals two, guys, basic stuff. In this case, the Ridd, Rydgland Farms, R-I-D-G-L-A-N, the weird name. Derek covered this already. A lot of people have covered this. During the confirmation overlap, it came out that, or even before that, in fact, we covered it well before that, like a lot of us did, the idea of Fauci and the Beagles and the experiments they were running. Now, what's the typical kind of way of the partisan game today, it wasn't even just

Starting point is 00:16:08 Fauci, guys. That's been going on for a very long time. and it happened during Trump's first administration. And so the reality that this is only applicable to Biden or whatever, it's just this utter stupidity of the partisan game today. Frankly, I think they're wildly undershooting the average intelligence of Americans. I think more Americans are much smarter than the thing they're aiming for. My opinion, either way, the point is that it wasn't just Biden, or just even Fauci.

Starting point is 00:16:31 But that's where it got noticed, and so it gets placed there. Now, what's important is that in the overlap, RFK and Trump acted like they cared about that, wanted to stop. maha we won't let that happen okay so derrick covered this in april 20th 20th 2026 way after the fact they told they were going to stop this riglin farm was one of the main locations he got called out animal activist arrested attempting to rescue tortured beagles while rfk junior claims ignorance now at this point and this is the article he wrote today derrick at this point in april it had been something they claimed they would stop rfk

Starting point is 00:17:05 claimed he would look into it but he didn't really believe that it was happening the way he was told and then nothing will seem to happen. Then these guys go in, try to get them, cause a lot of attention. Ultimately, other people successfully get some of these guys out of here and then after the fact, they take credit for it. Bottom line, though, the sad reality, even as they took credit for somebody else's effort to stop what he's told you, he would not allow to happen, they're still doing it. Lawsuit reveals cruel experiments on kittens continue under Kennedy and Trump. Please take the time to dive into this because it is not a small story. And this comes from, I don't want to mis-say their name.

Starting point is 00:17:41 It was W. Where was it again? Hold on right here. White coat waste. They're the ones who broke the story as far as I can tell. Lots of details. All sourced. It's important, guys, and this is not hard to see.

Starting point is 00:17:55 Documents revealed via a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit prove that the National Institutes of Health is investing more than $2 million into controversial experiments on cats and kittens at a breeding operation based at the University of Florida. These experiments involve breeding more than 100 cats with Neiman Pick Type C1. Interestingly, NPC1, and a fatal neurodegenerative disease that causes loss of muscle control, difficulty swallowing, and dementia. Now, you guys know what a soft spot I have for animals in general.

Starting point is 00:18:27 Now, I actually truly was tortured by whether or not I would put this clip in here. Now, just because it bothers me so much, and it's not important, but I do feel like it has some value to truly understand what they're putting these things through. The document uncovered by WCW show that these tests are financed by $2.202,639,706 in NIH funding that runs through November 2026. They also obtained disturbing images and videos of the cats and kittens living with NPC1. And all it is is just these idea of these animals that are struggling to stand and can't move. And that's all we're going to look at because I can't stand to watch that.

Starting point is 00:19:06 I mean, no, everyone has their opinions, but I just don't understand how anybody can think that it makes sense to do this to, I mean, whether, I mean, I guess people don't see the same, like, don't feel like there's a same quality, like value of life to a kitten versus a baby. I disagree. But either way, the idea that this is something acceptable to do to a, you know, any animal, by the way, for whatever the justified reason for your makeup test or whatever we're talking about, or did your, the disease testing, or,

Starting point is 00:19:36 Bottom line, I don't agree with it. Some people do. But nonetheless, why a kitten would be necessary, you know, because it gives them some kind of insight into some special brain. Like that's always an argument. But on top of all of that, I'm just making it clear that just in a general sense, I don't agree in this. I don't believe in this.

Starting point is 00:19:54 Now, you could make the points about animal testing when it comes to shots and how those things are historically what they do and that not being done might have opened some kind of a gap in their research. That's a fair point to make. And I said it before. doesn't mean I agree with the testing in the first place, just pointing out that their own lack of doing so might have caused it. That's not the same as saying you agree with animal testing.

Starting point is 00:20:14 Now, that being said, the point is that on top of just having it happen, the way that this is being done is grotesque to me. The way that they're treating these animals, the way that they're killing them after the fact, like this is like a puppy mill dynamic as far as I'm concerned. And it makes me just uncomfortable even. Like the idea that people are okay with this makes me look at them like their sociopaths. Just my opinion. So the records show that kittens as young as three weeks old are being

Starting point is 00:20:42 subjected to injections in their brain and carotid arteries, as well as repeated blood and tissue sample collections as the animal's health deteriorates in front of the researchers. The researchers continue to experiment on them as they deteriorate in front of them, including after they lose the ability to feed themselves. All cats will eventually be killed. Despite the promises of Health and Human Services, RFK Jr., Dr. J. Bartacharya at the CDC and Nicole Kleinschrower at the NIH, the Trump administration has continued to finance cat and dog experiments around the world since taking office. I mean, how many more things do we need to see? How many more feigned promises? I mean, I'm at the point where I think everyone's already there. How many people truly,

Starting point is 00:21:28 and this is the same point they keep making, can see the double-crossed or the food dies. And, I mean, you get down the list. What have they succeeded in doing is a better question. And that you think people aren't going to stand there and go, this is crazy. All of these things are lies. I mean, there's only so many lies you can be spun. They're not out there going, we took food dyes out. We stopped all these things. Some of them are, but the facts are undeniable. So my point is always is that most people have to be going, what the F is happening right now. These are not what you are promising. That's what I believe. And I think that's easy to see. Because this is just absurd, guys. They're going, these are like core.

Starting point is 00:22:04 It's like saying no Iran war. And we saved you from the Iran war because Kamala and then going to do it the same and then losing. People are long since waking up from all this. And I think there's a fringe, you know, team sport element that's keeping people from just missing how obvious it is.

Starting point is 00:22:22 Because they're hell bent on maintaining the status quo. That's what they do. Following in the announcements after the rescue of beagles. Now that was the point of this article. They went and rescued some of these beagles. And from there, tried to and then from there others were successfully rescued. Following the rescue, the HHS Secretary Kennedy and Secretary Brooks Rollins released a video

Starting point is 00:22:43 celebrating the victory and claiming they played a role in the release of the dogs. Now, this is the kind of Trump situation I've been used to. You know, like from the unique dishonesty, not just they're all dishonest, but the unique style of like blunt ham-fisted dishonesty from Trump's administration, you think we can't just stand back and do our own due diligence and go, oh, well, you didn't actually play. I just don't understand. That's desperation.

Starting point is 00:23:08 That's how I've been calling it since the beginning of this. I don't understand how it can be seen the other way. So this is where we are in a thousand different examples of how they promise one thing and deliver another. And it's not just some small deviation. It's like, we'll never do that. Then they do it six times longer. It's confounding.

Starting point is 00:23:25 It literally is the same kind of thing we're seeing with the Iran conversation. Right? Like you could make up a middle ground lie that might work for you. longer and better, but nope, it just keeps being that we're going to win today. It's over yesterday. And then fail for another six weeks. You know, that's what we're dealing with. And this is a special for, this kills me, guys, what they're doing to these animals while framing themselves as the hero. It's what I keep talking about. Now, this is kind of what I was alluding to a second ago in that last clip. But as I said with Benny Johnson and plenty of other examples. Here he is saying,

Starting point is 00:24:00 it's now clear that Dr. Fauci is the single greatest mass murder in modern human history. Well, that's a fair argument, and I could probably agree with that. What's crazy to me is he's on his last day in office or hers. Tulsi Gabbard dropped a bombshell about, you mean all the things that we already knew about, all the things that we discussed? And guess what, guys? What's happened, Johnson? Who's in jail?

Starting point is 00:24:21 Benny, are there investigations ongoing? We knew all of this. You're telling me Gabbard had this entire time and that Trump had this the entire time, and only just now is she saying it? nothing's been happening. You know, I mean, this is why you have to see through these people. Neither side will do anything. And look, either of them could have this entire time.

Starting point is 00:24:41 People like Benny Johnson are the modern version of the Q, Siop. With all this weird stuff coming out right now, the mostly things that were already discussed, Alex Jones broke the story about Q. You mean the SIOP that we've all making fun of that you were pushing half the time? He's got videos out there calling himself Q for crying out loud. These guys are such obvious manipulators.

Starting point is 00:24:59 Anyway, this, in my opinion, is the new version of that, the kind of extension of that. What they're doing right here, all of them. The kind of weird red light, holy crap thing we keep seeing. The errat doughties and bent, that's what these people are, in my opinion. They keep you feeling like you're just on the edge of massive change and disruption, all while making sure you never counter signal the leader, as they said, or ever actually do something. Hashtag arrest someone. I just think that's very obvious, guys.

Starting point is 00:25:27 and might just keep watching as they keep doing this. You know, if you were an honest reporter, you would be screaming about why Trump has challenged all the things you wanted, even things he said that he now pretends he never said, or why he never arrested Fauci, or why they're still pushing COVID shots, or down the list, guys. But nope, they're going to cheerlead whatever comes next.

Starting point is 00:25:47 It's what they do. Now, the same thing, here's Representative Anna Paulina Luna, clearly the new generation of the same game, saying, this is Daily Mail, Spy World, panic as Tulsi Gabbard prepares to unleash bombshell dumps on mind control. Dr. Fauci. I mean, guys, have fun looking through stuff that we talked about for 20 years. MK. Ultra, Vouchy, all of this stuff.

Starting point is 00:26:08 I haven't seen a single example of something that's actually new. Now, I'm not going to, just to be clear, I'm not saying I've dove through everything they put out so far. But from what I've seen, I'm not seeing anything that even remotely changes the conversation. And the idea of MK Ultra conversation, I mean, do your diligence and recognize these people are using information that's basically out there and sometimes using other things that are new but not really adding to the conversation like with JFK and all the stuff they've been doing. It's about distracting you from where we are right now, which is a massive moment of change. She said, just in time for the upcoming MK Ultra hearing.

Starting point is 00:26:44 Oh, what a coincidence that she happened to have coordinated MK Ultra hearing right alongside Gabbard releasing new information. Wow, it's almost like they coordinated this. And the truth is, guys, no matter what, my prediction. and I hope I'm wrong. No matter what you reveal, no one will ever be arrested. Bookmark it.

Starting point is 00:27:02 Wait, let's find out. I mean, if it's that easy to predict that they'll yell a bunch of new things and never do anything about it, everyone can see it, whether or not they yell it out. You know that already. Now, this is interesting. Speaking of fraud and the Epstein class,

Starting point is 00:27:19 Mo, this is, Mo Davis shared this. Guys, this guy looks like something out of a monopoly movie, like, or some kind of ridiculous. joke, like a Saturday Live skit. This is Trump's donor, is Mar-Lago neighbor. His name is John Kaffaro, who actually just got the no-bid contract, meaning they didn't think or consider anybody else.

Starting point is 00:27:39 I just gave it to him to install a water purification system, can you guess, on the reflecting pool? Like, you might as well even think all of this might have been manufactured just to be able to give this guy billions of dollars. I don't necessarily think that. but all of this conversation, all this ridiculous narrative, the failure of the pool. It's like, who cares, by the way, of any of it? I mean, look, them lying and getting caught lying and the humorous nature of them

Starting point is 00:28:04 embarrassing themselves. Yeah, I get it. But people are literally covered, like the major stories about the, they did this, they dumped that. I mean, I've pointed out in jest on the way through stories, like laughing at them dumping stuff in the pool because it's typical Trump. But my God, guys, he has two prior convictions, prior convictions, one for bribing a member of Congress.

Starting point is 00:28:22 and another for an illegal loan that violated campaign finance laws. But yeah, no big deal. He's a part of the club. I mean, literally what I said, this is what they mean when they say Epstein class. I mean, you just, guys, that's just laughable, guys. I mean, it's in your face. And people like Johnson and the rest are going to go, yay, MAGA winning. This is what meritocracy look.

Starting point is 00:28:42 Really? Nobody actually believes that. Nobody who has a brain anyway. Tennessee holler says, this is real. A no-bid reflecting pool contract went to a sleazy Trump donor. with a history of bribery and illegal loans. Here's the New York Times article, if you want to read it. The business owned by trust led by John J. Kaffaro.

Starting point is 00:29:01 My God. Oh, here's another example of something humorous. This is a clip. The alt you can watch is 11 minutes. Cash Mattel comes out today and says, Crypto fraudsters have been scamming and taking advantage of America for too long. No more. This FBI will find you except totally not look into the largest example in history,

Starting point is 00:29:19 which is the Trump family. And that's what everyone's laughing about. I mean, this is, by the way, this is more perfect union. I don't agree with everything that's in this clip. It's somewhat mainstreamy. But my God, guys, if you watch this, the general facts of this are not, we've been talking about this since the beginning. World Liberty Financial.

Starting point is 00:29:36 The amount of crypto scams, and I mean, literal pump and dump, obvious scams they've run. They just sold, I mean, it's not obviously crypto, but they just sold coins at the UFC. They're selling watches and shoes. And, I mean, it is just a massive string of fraud, or rather just profiteering, but fraud as well, in my opinion. But this goes through the people tied to liberty, world liberty financial and finance and the bail. These people are criminals. I mean, just seriously, if you actually watch this with an honest, just go into it with no partisan view and pretend they're talking about Biden, or I guess that's contradictory, but go at it with your partisan views and pretend they're

Starting point is 00:30:12 talking about Biden. And you tell me you would not be freaking out if you're a conservative, this was all about Biden. And so here's cash for this weird little produced, overproduced Hollywood skit video of like what was the song it doesn't even matter some weird they're all flash no substance and it's about him stopping him and bringing her justice it's just sad it's obviously not what anybody actually thinks and then they come out with this on the 18th and they put out like 11 more of these for some reason with this same weird little background model of grand theft auto we really saved america before gta 6 i just said i don't think they thought this one through grand theft america maybe they did maybe they're like we're doing it shut up

Starting point is 00:30:51 Who knows? But anyway, one more joke before we get into some serious conversation. White House says, it's the American way. And they put this meme out. Now, I just had to make fun of this because it's humorous to me. Can anybody else know? Like, can you ask yourself, where's the italic choice come from here? Who thought this through?

Starting point is 00:31:10 And we're like, I got it. It's going to be peace through strength. Right? Does that make sense? Like you emphasize the piece through strength. It's just silly. I mean, it just makes no sense to me. why you would have talp the italic would be on the you know peace with strength it's just funny to me

Starting point is 00:31:26 it doesn't make sense but whatever that's the kind of stuff you get from people like this that don't they thought that sounded cooler look more powerful without even thinking that it doesn't actually make any sense peace through strength might make sense peace through strength might make sense but peace through strength doesn't really make sense to me either way the idea what they're talking about is war that's what they mean and has this looked like peace through strength this literally just showed you that strength is not enough to get peace. Even if you actually had enough strength to do it, it still might not even amount to what you want.

Starting point is 00:31:56 Peace, even if you take over everything. But this is an example of feigning strength does not get you anything. And then I'm putting this out on the 19th, after you just signed a memorandum of understanding that you've also been violating, and Iran's showing they don't care, they're not going to hold up the part of it. They're not going to uphold their part of it.

Starting point is 00:32:13 If you do not yours, ultimately it shows you that Iran is not in a position of weakness. and you put this out now, it screams weakness. That's my point of Trump saying he can do whatever he wants. I've got no limits because he does. And he knows that. Now, before we get into the Iran conversation and the rest of it, the update, this is a clip that Jason Bassler just made for TLAV, and it's about the COVID shots that they did just fund.

Starting point is 00:32:41 That's the COVID-19 shot for an infant and a COVID-19 shot for an adult. Over a billion dollars for Pfizer of all people. Go on continuing to tell people about how they're changing everything. Maga Maha. Pfizer, of all people, over a billion dollars for new COVID shots. Nobody in any side can stand there and tell me that that lines up with what anybody seems to want. I mean, even the Democrats right now seem to be somewhat uncomfortable for these new shots. And here we are with this administration, $1.2 billion for new COVID shots.

Starting point is 00:33:13 Now, this is a clip he put together about three minutes of us talking about this and going over the contracts, as well as the self-amplifying shots they are leaning into. But this is in addition to that, Derek saw this. Modern Moderna's MRA flu vaccine backed by FDA advisors. Now, I want to be clear about this. It is important. And I'll say right out of the gate, I think this is going to be approved by the FDA.

Starting point is 00:33:37 Excuse me, FDA. I really do. I think this is going to be approved by Trump's administration, probably quietly. But I could be wrong. I mean, look, I wouldn't have thought they would go with a Stargate COVID-19 or rather MRN platform program on day one of an administration built to fight MRNA, right?

Starting point is 00:33:55 But I was wrong and they did. Tons of things I wouldn't have thought they would do, like deciding to double cross you on food dyes or push for glyphosate or ignore Brooke Jackson's lawsuit with Pfizer or push for Florida to stay in your water. You know, I never would have expected those things, but they're doing them. So that's to say that, who knows, maybe they will push back on this to make a point. It doesn't mean they're still leaning into other COVID shots and other MRI shots. So it's kind of moot.

Starting point is 00:34:18 But that's my point. I get the sense this is going to go forward. But at the moment, this is not backed by their administration, at least not publicly. Moderna's MRI flu vaccine backed by FDA advisors. Now, that's the advisory committee. Now, Trump and rather the president has influence over this to some degree over a period of time, but not instantaneously, at least as I understand it. So it says advisors to the FDA on Thursday backed approval of Moderna's flu vaccine,

Starting point is 00:34:46 which is MRNA for 50 and older, saying it's benefits outweigh its risks. I mean, we're still doing that, guys. So ask yourself this. If we're not talking about some pandemic, we're all going to die, the lie, really, of what it was before, which was why they argued

Starting point is 00:35:01 that we have to push it out quickly, and that's why the benefits, that way the risk, hurry, get it to them. Okay, okay. They lied, but hypothetically, the logic might kind of make sense. Why then now? Why are you putting something out

Starting point is 00:35:13 that even has risks if we're not in a rush? If we're not screaming, we're all going to die tomorrow. Why don't you make it all benefit and little risk? Why does it have to be 55% benefit and 45% risk? I mean, I'm not even going to answer that. I have plenty of my theories on what this is actually about and what they're trying, you know, whether it comes to a like a deliberate harm or whether it's experimentation

Starting point is 00:35:33 or whether it's just incompetence or profiteering. But think about that. There's no world in which we should be accepting something that is dangerous because of, I mean, you know, you get the point. boosting the company's chances of launching its first MRNA-based seasonal flu shot. Under former FDA Commissioner Marty McCarrie and his lieutenants, the FDA had rejected Moderna's initial application for the shot. Now McCarrie's out of the way now.

Starting point is 00:35:58 The nine panel members voted unanimously in favor of use of Moderna's shot emfluzeba in adults, age 50 to 64, as well as those 65 and older, the age group that had concerned regulators. And it's the same thing they always do. You're aiming a shot that hasn't been tested on immunocompromised at a group that is largely in that category. These are usually the groups historically that you wouldn't even give shots to because they're largely more at risk. The argument was always you give it to everybody else to keep them safe. Now you're focusing on them, even though that risk triples or whatever that will go into it,

Starting point is 00:36:31 knowing that they are the groups that are actually at more risk. But when you test it, as we'll go through it, they don't test for that kind of risk. It seems wildly counterintuitive, but guys, guys, this is the process. I've talked about this since COVID and before. If approved, Moderna's shot would be the first seasonal flu in the United States made with MRI technology, flu shot.

Starting point is 00:36:52 Now, frankly, I don't even agree with that. There's been shot, now, let's just say mass produced and given. It would complete, compete with flu vaccines from Sanofi, Glasswell Smith-Kline, CSL,

Starting point is 00:37:03 Securus, and AstraZeneca. The FDA approval decision on the vaccine is expected by August 5th. So that means it's being deliberate. It's being, it's up there. I mean, if this was something that was an absolute, no, I don't think, I think we would have heard that by now. And I feel like they would have made this, I feel like we would have seen different actions. But we'll have to wait and see.

Starting point is 00:37:24 Jeffrey's analyst, Andrew Tassai, or just probably Psi, how do you say that? Z has forecasted $750 million in the U.S. sales of Moderna's flu shot and combination flu COVID vaccine by 2030. Sye and, or however it was, what was it again? God, I know, I remember reading that. It's like, oh, so it's like tsunami. So like, I think it's sci. TSAI said an FDA approval in flu could be viewed as a positive sign for Moderna's COVID flu combo vaccine, which they're also working on.

Starting point is 00:37:56 The combo shot is approved in the EU, but does not have you as approval. Not yet. Acting FDA commissioner, Kyle Diomantus, has since approved a stable, excuse me, stabilized agency operations. Excuse me, I can't read for some. reason, has since moved to stabilize agency operations and repair relations with the biotech sector after months of upheaval. Doesn't, I mean, that seems to me with what he has been doing, signals more of a, a relationship

Starting point is 00:38:25 with groups like this. I mean, guys, if you just gave Pfizer over a billion dollars for COVID shots, why would we even be doubting that this would go forward? What's the difference? No, I shouldn't say there are differences, but the point would be it's just as contradictory. to what was promised. So I hope that this doesn't happen. But even if it does, it's or doesn't,

Starting point is 00:38:50 there's already plenty happening in the same regard. But it's MRNA 101 or 101. And just to point out that the trials, that this is trap, they're in phase three, look at when this started. So if you need more evidence that there is an obvious handing of the baton from Biden to Trump or from left to right or right to left,

Starting point is 00:39:12 even on things they claim to be adversarial about, well, here we are. The same started under Biden, continued and finished under Trump. Now, again, to be clear, this is, we're talking about a modern trial, but this is, has always been in coordination with government. That's, that, I mean, I can't say that's explicitly the case with them and Trump's administration, but that's an obvious historical reality, even when post-COVID 19, even more so. But like I said, these are my opinions.

Starting point is 00:39:38 The point is it is being made, we'll have to see where it ends up. And I wanted you guys to be aware of this, whatever side rolls it out, if it, whether, or wherever in the world it does, in fact, even have been the EU. Because this stuff to me is problematic with what we understand about what happened during COVID-19 and what this leads to.

Starting point is 00:39:56 Now, I'm going to read you some of the parts through this that I found. This came out, and I find this to be important. So this is something right now that's being tested on a wide-scale phase three trial and they're not discussing this for potentially FDA approval as of August. This came out June 18th.

Starting point is 00:40:09 This was yesterday. So let me show you some of the stuff that's in here. This is the yesterday document. meaning it's not some early trial document. Solicited adverse reactions within seven days post-vaccination were more frequent in this recipient category for the flu shot than in comparative recipients. So just simple starting point. They got more frequent reactions with the shot versus the ones that didn't.

Starting point is 00:40:34 That's just usually common, but as it goes forward, there were 40,000, 805 participants. I find that relevant when we get to the stats. Now it says no cases of mildocarditis or paracarditis were identified within 42 days. Now, in that regard, there, I think the average, at least as it was reported, which a lot of that was underreported, was within a week. But there's been a lot of long-term studies showing a continual issue with myocarditis,

Starting point is 00:41:00 paracarditis, well after one and a half months. So who knows where this goes after, you know, a year follow-up, which is something that people are highlighting now, not through mainstream medical investigatory because they don't want to see the problem. But if you look at the people that have been breaking this down, for a long time and studying this long term. Many of them are still calling it long COVID, if you can believe that. But these are coming because of these connections with the shots.

Starting point is 00:41:27 Now it says under key uncertainty, efficacy in immunocompromised individuals and very frail. So old people has not been established. So you're telling me that you finish these studies. It hasn't been established that these even efficacy, it's not even efficacious, meaning it works, not safe or not, but whether it even had the effect that you want it to, in the group that you are aiming it at, 50 to 65. To me, that's insane. It doesn't make sense.

Starting point is 00:41:56 Like making a childhood vaccine that you don't test on children. How do you make sense of that? efficacy in immunocompromised groups and very frail has not been established. This gap is significant, their own study says, because these populations face the highest absolute risk of severe influence-related complications and may respond differently to MR-N-based vaccine platforms. Gee, those are some good thoughts. Maybe we should hold the study and find, nah.

Starting point is 00:42:21 We'll notate it and move forward like we always do, right? The study exclusion of these groups limits direct applicability of the efficacy data to a substantial portion of the intended patient of population. So I guess we'll just assume it works because we can't know for sure. Great study. But my point is, this would be an important data point if you actually care to correct these things. Not that I can see.

Starting point is 00:42:43 But again, we'll wait and see if and when this is approved or actually comes out. I can tell this is the current information. Data on concommonant administration, as usual, if you remember our coverage during COVID, this is like every other shot you'll find, has not been studied with co-administration of other vaccines, meaning they haven't tested alongside the COVID shot, haven't tested alongside the pneumonia, R-SV, anything. And I can promise you, like we saw all through COVID-19 and right to this very day, right now you go to Walgreens or whatever and they'll promote the COVID and flu shot right next to each

Starting point is 00:43:17 other, even though to this very day, they have not been tested alongside each other. I can show you the data right now. I showed it you a thousand times during COVID-19 timeframes. In this case, they're now going to go in and say, here's your elderly, your grandpa. Oh, give them this new COVID shot. We've rather flu shot because it'll keep them safe, even though it's not tested on old people, they might even have an immunode deficiency issue like a lot of them do, not testing on that either. And, oh, flu shot at the same time or COVID shot.

Starting point is 00:43:41 And now you haven't tested that either. Oh, but don't worry. Benefits that way the risk. So there's definitely risks on top of that that we're including. but, you know, benefits are much. I just don't understand why people can't see through this at this point. And as always, to be clear, I'm not suggesting that everything in any realm of this science is somehow wrong. But it's so obvious.

Starting point is 00:44:00 It could be, but it's so obvious that what we think we know is we've been lied to about so much in our lives that we should be questioning foundational parts of this kind of information. Now, I'm not suggesting that it should be removed from, you know, like the idea being that if this is something that you want to engage with, it's up to you. but if we are proving these things are deadly, that's something that cannot even be considered. The idea that we can have a shot out there that is literally, you know,

Starting point is 00:44:23 I mean, don't go down the list of what we know these things are causing. And I'm talking about the COVID shots, to be clear. That's like suggesting that, well, if you want to take arshnick, it's up to you. And it's like, well, technically that's correct, but we're talking about the idea of children, not the same thing.

Starting point is 00:44:36 But either way, the bottom line is that these things are shown through their platform technology, through the research we've already covered, to have very clear issues that have not been resolved. Immunogenicity as supporting evidence. Immunogenicity data may provide mechanistic support for the observed efficacy for all three vaccine strains. So just so you know, it aims at those three. So hypothetically should be a different strain. If you believe that's how this works, then it wouldn't work at all. So we're told. Or it might not. Or we don't know or made

Starting point is 00:45:03 of extra side effects. But you know, roll those dice, guys, it'll work out. However, a COP has not been established for M. Flusiva. Formal correlative risk, COP analysis are ongoing. going and outside the scope of the briefing document. I mean, don't we have a clip for that? I mean, I don't remember if I'm going to remove these from so long ago. The idea that they literally said this during COVID-19. It's right there. I just still don't understand how this stuff is not this obvious to everybody else.

Starting point is 00:45:32 And then can you repeat the second question? I do. I mean, obviously, you have a lot of data now. What is your political protection is? Everybody's measuring anybody's, they're probably relevant. But as we know, it's a long question. we need a quick answer. I would say there is no established correlate of protection.

Starting point is 00:45:53 Right. So that's very clear. And that, as far as I can tell, never really changed. What they're saying is the antibody production is what they use to grade the level of efficacy. Even though we proved, and we can still see right now, that they were guessing, even at the best of times, they'll admit that if you really push them, they're guessing at what strain. So aiming at whatever they claim they were aiming at during COVID-19, especially when you're dealing with other vaccine illness. and side effects isn't going to work.

Starting point is 00:46:17 And so the idea being is that what you saw was a spike in antibodies, but it wasn't even what you were fighting. And so it didn't actually have any efficacy for actually keeping you safe. But you sure as hell had a hell of a lot of antibodies, which then goes on to cause antibody dependent enhancements and all the different things you talked about. But this is the same idea, guys, what they're saying is essentially we can't verify that correlative protection. But we see the result, which then suggests to us based on our expertise, that that is going

Starting point is 00:46:43 to protect you. Should it be one of those three stains out of the hundreds of thousands or whatever they claim are out there? And again, I'm not even leaning into that side of that. This is their argument. So from within their own narrative, it seems like a crap shoot, doesn't it? But they're the experts, guys. They know. Study population generalize, generalizability.

Starting point is 00:47:02 The P304 study population, that's the 40,000 we pointed to, was healthier and less frail than the general U.S. target population. with that first line, why would you set it up that way? Well, I can tell you, my opinion is because you want, that would make it look better. So if you take a bunch of elderly people who is, by the way, who they're aimed at right now, this shot in particular, and you don't make sure that it meets the same quality of the group that's actually in reality. You get a bunch of, you know, I can't think of the word all of a sudden, you know, just, marathon running 80-year-old men, you know, whatever. Oh, yeah, they're all a bunch of, this is what they're saying, though.

Starting point is 00:47:43 The study population was healthier and less frail than what would normally be in the group that we're actually aiming at. As the study excluded immunocompromised individuals, the very thing they say, I mean, this is insane, and enrolled participants in a lower prevalence of high-risk conditions, meaning exactly what you're trying to aim it at. So if you do that, the numbers will come out looking much better. But then when you give it to the people that are immunocompromised and do have higher risk and are older and frailer, that you're going to have a much higher problem, aren't you? That seems like fraud to me. In contrast, the general U.S.

Starting point is 00:48:16 target population has a substantially higher prevalence of high-risk conditions, 78 to 93%. So now, guys, we're not even talking about just the elderly population. If they're arguing that 78 to 93% of the U.S. population has a high prevalence of high-risk conditions, gee, I wonder where that came from. What that means? Why would you ever even create a study group that? that didn't have those numbers.

Starting point is 00:48:42 To lie to you, I would argue, compared with the P304 study population. So the population they chose for the study as a 57% prevalence of high risk. The general population apparently has 7.8.93. Is that not just deliberate manipulation? Although this difference may be partially attributable to differences in how high risk conditions are defined.

Starting point is 00:49:03 Or, you know, that you deliberately chose those people for those reasons. I know, I'm crazy, right? That's just insane to me. And so what you're doing is aiming it at groups that will make it look better, right? And then people are getting hurt because you are using a population to manipulate and fudge those numbers. Relative vaccine effectiveness was lower in high-risk PO-3-4 participants. The vaccine effectiveness was lower in the high-risk participants that actually meet the numbers that are in the real world.

Starting point is 00:49:31 Funny that, but of course, we're going to go with the number from our population study that makes it look better. Shocking. Compared with the high-risk participants. And it goes on to say the 95% common. confidence intervals overlap, and the study was not powered to detect significantly significant differences in risk. Well, there, that makes you feel better. This finding should be interpreted cautiously.

Starting point is 00:49:52 Nevertheless, the direction of the difference suggests that the RVE is the healthier study population may, now get prepared yourself, may overestimate the effectiveness in the general population. Wow, I'm shocked, but, of course, this will be going forward regardless. Now, here is just one of the many graphs, and these never-trivolve. truly grasp the full picture because what they do is they design will box out people who start to get sick early, will have a very serious problem that they then justify with something else happens every time. We've all seen it. So in this case, generally comparing this new

Starting point is 00:50:25 MRA 1-101 101, just the regular local reactions more than double. That's not a good indicator of the, you know, so double or the double the just general local reactions in the first week. systemic reactions, but 20% more. That's a lot, guys. And this is, now remember, this is aimed at the healthy population, not the reality of what these people actually are, let alone immunode compromise, let alone actually elderly. Serious adverse events that, you know, an increase, so it's notable, but it's only, what, 0.2% deaths the same.

Starting point is 00:51:00 Surprise, surprise. I find that almost impossible. But myocarditis, in the controlled population seven, in the new MRI, a shot category, 10. Now, they may underplay this, but what that means, that's a 33% increase in myocarditis. The very thing they told you was, I mean, you know, like I told you, it was what, they didn't even, they didn't, after 43 days, they didn't even keep following up. So I think that's on, I bet you on 44, it exploded. That's what I would sense in there. But either way, that's seven to 10. That's a 30, 30%, rather, 30% increase in the risk of myocarditis using their 40,000

Starting point is 00:51:39 population study. That matters. The Ambari syndrome, one for the M or NA, zero for comparator, Bell's palsy was slanted towards the comparator. These things matter to me. You know, I mean, and it's not all or nothing, like the Bell's policy one shows you. Maybe that could be a mistake. That could be because, you know, or that could represent why the others are flip-flop. It doesn't, the end of the day, all of what we've seen and these numbers matter. And nonetheless, it'll be pushed forward, I argue. That's my opinion. We'll have to wait until August to see what this government does. But with $1 billion already going to Pfizer for new shots,

Starting point is 00:52:12 it wouldn't surprise me if this goes forward anyway. I just simply wanted you to know what it was, where it goes, if and when, to protect your family. Now, also on this platform right now, because it's not getting as much attention for obvious reasons, Alan Martin shows that Medical Freedom Warrior and their friend Peggy X, Peggy's X account, excuse me,

Starting point is 00:52:34 I believe we followed them, actually, was suspended for posting a link to the Pfizer-ized website. I'm really tired of the censorship they write. I wish they had a link here and share it myself. This account, as Mary Talley Bowden points out, this account was suspended on Twitter for calling Pfizer a liar. Free speech, huh? I mean, what's funny is that this would get tons of attention

Starting point is 00:53:00 if it was in any way usable by the current party game. But I mean, this should be huge, guys. Because Twitter's lying because Elon Musk is showing you he's not free speech, because Pfizer is something that we all care about the actual the COVID-shot conversation and the exposing of Pfizer or something they're covering up, that should be a bombshell, but not for some people. Thank you, Mary, for having integrity. Okay, so those discussions I wanted you to make sure you saw, because it's going to continue

Starting point is 00:53:28 and we're going to try to make sure, you know, even when we're like, even in the midst of the peak of the COVID-19 conversation, we were still doing our best to try to inform you about other things that were happening because it's easy to get eclipsed by some of these larger stories, like what's going on with Iran. It is a big deal because it's not just Iran alone. This is connected to Lebanon conversation. This is connected to what Gaza is still dealing with. It is part of the same ongoing discussion,

Starting point is 00:53:51 whether you look at it through greater Israel or through Trump's agenda or, you know, the globalist transition, the technocratic ship, all of these things tie into these different parts. But on the 15th, this is what we titled our show. Trump's Iran deal, in quotes, is a veiled surrender and a treat for the United States. Now, that's exactly what I still think it is. It's, I mean, it's embarrassing to watch people try to argue it's somehow an absolute win, and they exist. Believe it or not, they're actually out there. But so let's go through this.

Starting point is 00:54:23 Show you where we're currently at. I stand by the same statement. If you'd watch that show or the one three days before that, I argue you would still be better informed at what's happening right now than most people watching even the mainstream alternative media, let alone corporate media. This is from Washington Examiner. This came out today. Trump declares Iran is finished. Amid reports, the straight of her moose has been closed again. Now, we'll get to the Hormuz part of this.

Starting point is 00:54:46 And actually each individual part of this, you know, the nuclear part of it, the straight part of it, the, you know, the different aspects of the argument and what the discrepancies are. But just to start with it because usually what I'll do is I'll start from the older part of it and work up to the current part where we're at today. But it's important to start kind of in the reverse to see that right up right now today. Trump is now, and this is after all we heard, all of this. It's over. We won. The deal's made. and everyone's signed it.

Starting point is 00:55:10 You know, or when we point to the memorandum of understanding and show you the point that they've been highlighting since April, and then having people over the last few days argue that somehow that you were wrong and misled, and, you know, you haven't even seen it yet. You mean the one that Trump signed, the one that the U.S. government handed to these people, there's a level of, like, willful manipulation out there from people that are either working to hide this because it's bad for Israel or because they don't want Trump to be seen for a fool.

Starting point is 00:55:33 I honestly think that's a small percentage, but they exist. I think most honest people out there are clearly willing to call. all this out right now. But either way, starting today, after all the conversation of all that, and Trump is now saying that they're finished. If you haven't seen it, as of right now, now, something might have changed, as always, in the last hour. And something right now might change over the next 12 hours to where what we're talking about now will suddenly no longer be the reality. But as of right now, what happened was surprise, surprise, the bombing of Lebanon and the ongoing, at least up until today, the blockade, which will was in some cases, will show you

Starting point is 00:56:08 actually still in effect, despite even what Grock will tell you, or the narratives out there, which is so hilarious to me. It is in some ways and was like I was telling you in effect, according to Iran and according to people on the ground. And the reality being that that became it together, but specifically Lebanon as of right now, even if the blockade has been stopped, the reason that the U.S. government and Israel in the eyes of Iran violated even the tentative memorandum of understanding that hadn't even been led to a deal yet. So, and that's what happened is they stood up and said, you're now in violation. we postponed our negotiations for today, for Friday, as well as the potential for, you know,

Starting point is 00:56:44 signing anything in the future. The 60 days were paused. We're off with this right. And that's where we're at. So we're going to go through all this and show you where we currently are and whether or not you see something changed. Let me know in the chat. Donald Trump declared that Iran is finished. In his first statement since Israel launched massive strikes against Lebanon, which, by the way, happened on the 15th, 16th, the 17th, 18th, and the 19th, where Israel has continued to bomb Iran, almost because it was so clearly stated as part of the deal. Even Trump said as much, despite what I'm actually humorously seeing this

Starting point is 00:57:16 over the last couple of days where you get the Eric Doutity types that come out and yell about how Lebanon's not part of that or whatever, even though then Trump comes out and goes, Lebanon's part of it. It's like they don't even know where they're aiming at anymore. Are they, like, what I think those people are captured by is a lot of times the Israel first side of the America First Party

Starting point is 00:57:32 and not even knowing that, if that makes sense to you. So now they're kind of confused by, wait a minute, is that we're supposed to be siding with what? that part of the team says or what Trump says, it's humorous. It says amid the chaos, Israel and Hezbollah reportedly agreed to renew a ceasefire. Now, we'll point to this in a second. Now, I don't believe. I think this is what it always was.

Starting point is 00:57:54 Remember, the first so-called ceasefire, really, to go back even a step further, well before even October 7th, there was allegedly a ceasefire that Israel has been ongoing continually violating. I've been covering this for years, in fact. You can go back to Craig Murray talking about this post-October 7th, and I was showing you. He was there. They're bombing in Lebanon right now and no one's talking about it. No one cared, it seems. So up, then you come into the overlap of this conversation will suddenly become as part of it because Iran says it's part of the deal. We have to stop bombing all these

Starting point is 00:58:22 people illegally, which I agree with. But so then, in the midst of all of that, you had some illusory ceasefire. Even though there was already a ceasefire, mind you, where Israel made an agreement with Lebanon, not Hezbollah, but the occupied government that is in fact largely on the side of Israel the United States, which you can clearly see. And that agreement was to stop Hezbollah from engaging. We laughed about that because there was no ceasefire. That was a game they did with Lebanon so they could blame Hezbollah for whatever they wanted to do. So now for them to say they renewed that, I don't take it at face value because I don't think they've had an agreement with Hezbollah. And I don't think, you couldn't renew something you didn't have, but maybe they're just using the wrong terms and

Starting point is 00:59:01 they made some agreement with Hezbollah. But even then, they're bombing them right now. So that's pretty clear. But again, even if the argument is somehow that Israel will bomb right up until the ceasefire and then stop, they've never held up to that end. They've never actually followed through. And why anybody would think it makes sense to bomb right up until the moment you're supposed to stop, it shows you that they don't care, guys. And as if it isn't known Netanyahu and Ben Gavir and Smodrich and everybody in the Israeli government are screaming about how they're not bound by this agreement and they're going to keep bombing Lebanon. So it's pretty clear. Yesterday and the day before, I discussed the possibility, and I see this as genuinely being possible, depending

Starting point is 00:59:39 of what Trump does, that Iran could even carve out some issue to, like, if Trump truly gives all these concessions, even regardless of what Israel does, I can see a world in which Iran carved this out for just Israel and then effectively kind of isolates them that way, even though Israel is still bombing Lebanon. If Trump gives them more of what they want, that might happen. And it would still be a massive win for Israel, or for, excuse me, for Iran. But we'll come back to that. Amid the chaos, Israel and Hezbollah reportedly agreed to a ceasefire.

Starting point is 01:00:07 The ceasefire, according to media reports, was brokered by the U.S. and Qatari negotiators. Neither Israel nor Hezbollah have confirmed the truth. So you get a bunch of narrative from the people who want you to think that. Trump's first post on true social, since the strikes, did not mention Israel or Lebanon, but instead pitched the war with Iran as a victory, which is just kind of hard to. It's laughable. And everyone can see that. And so just, you know, that's my point about what I was saying for the first clip.

Starting point is 01:00:37 For him to yell and scream that we won when nobody actually thinks that, it's just, it's cringy. It's, it's hard to watch. And I think that's, you know, him not knowing what else to do. Quote, we didn't need, or excuse me, we didn't meet out of desperation. Iran did. It's what he wrote. They are finished.

Starting point is 01:00:54 We'll play out the 60 days. They get no money. Not 10 cents, you know, aside from the fact that's literally what the agreement says. And this isn't even getting into whether or not, you know, post. violation of this and the kind of pausing of the 60 deal. The point, though, is that they met, clearly, because Trump wanted that. You can look back for yourself. They, Trump kept saying, well, regardless of the bombings, we're going to meet and we want a ceasefire. Okay, Iran said, take it or leave, we're still standing in the same spot the whole time. They meet.

Starting point is 01:01:23 Iran demands the same things we told you since April. You can prove that right now. So how in the world can you argue they met a desperation? You just can't believe this anymore. Now, whether or not they get anything is when I do argue that they've already gotten some money. I think that was already clear. We'll come back to the Financial Times article. It's exactly what I was already telling you. There's 24 billion unfrozen. As far as I can understand, three to six has already gotten there.

Starting point is 01:01:48 And another 12 was supposed to be sent over the next 60 days. But nothing should be taking a face value right now, guys. So where we're at is that as of today, the Lebanon aspect from Iran's perspective has caused this to stop. but even before that, it was obvious they weren't in a position of weakness. Quote, the war has diminished Iran, says Trump. It doesn't any longer have an Air Force, a Navy, anti-aircraft. He just keeps doing this.

Starting point is 01:02:16 I can't tell whether he truly thinks this and he thinks anything to the opposite is some trick by the Democrats or whatever childish thing he's doing, or if he just knows he's lying. I don't know. But guys, you could prove that's not true. Robert broke this a long time ago and people well before that, the idea of the underground tunnels they had the under in the the the what are they the mountain cave cabinists the caves that were basically on the what do you call it you know they had water they had an open cave mouth with water the one underneath and they had videos of this that came out long before

Starting point is 01:02:43 this even started showing you they had tons of of naval ships under there why because they knew this was coming they told you they knew this was coming they went to the u.n before the 28th of february and said we know they're going to bomb them they're going to bomb us and if we do we're going to bomb back all these countries that are working with them. It was all very clear, and yet they still went on to act like it was some unprecedented response. They knew their terrorists. The war is diminished Iran. And you list off all the things he keeps saying.

Starting point is 01:03:08 And yet the Democrats say Iran is better off now than it was four months ago. Guys, it's unequivocally obvious. They've gained entirely. Like, I'm not going to suggest that they didn't lose stuff. But in a very obvious strategic sense, global influence sense, it's undeniable. I mean, whether the $10 billion, they stand. to make on the tolls to the strait or the control of the straight or the idea that you've conceded in every point other even the nuclear point they're lying about right now but you guys know all this

Starting point is 01:03:35 we've talked about it for months now the point is that this is what they're still saying can you imagine getting away with that stupid people how stupid people can be again like he says you're dumb for knowing something is actually a violation of your constitutional rights apparently you're dumb for knowing that he's lying about that israel launched strikes against over against over 80 hezbole of targets in lebanon and committed not to leaving the country after four Israeli soldiers were killed. Yes, and those four Israeli soldiers were killed because you invaded the country,

Starting point is 01:04:02 even though everyone told you had to stop because of the agreement. That's what happened. Over the last couple of days, they tried to invade on the ground because Trump was saying no bombing, even though they kept bombing anyway, and they got annihilated.

Starting point is 01:04:13 I'll show you some examples in a minute. Like, it's a pretty big story, and they got absolutely destroyed, and people died, and I think it's pretty clearly more than four. And in response, some outlets reported the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps sent out a radio broadcast announcing the reclosure of the straight. Now, we'll get into this in where it currently is. This is about the reality that they

Starting point is 01:04:32 reclosed the straight back to what it was because they violated their agreements. And like they said, the straight, or rather the blockade and Lebanon, day after day after day. And I told you the same. And now they're still there. They're still bombing Lebanon. And we'll get into the blockade part in the second. And that's why they're stopping. Since Israel's withdrawn from Lebanon and the complete lifting of the naval blockade and the withdrawal of American terrorist forces from the Persian Gulf and the region are among the main conditions of the agreement between Iran and the United States. The Strait of Hermuz will remain closed until these two conditions are met. All ships are ordered not to approach the strait for their own safety and health.

Starting point is 01:05:09 Any vessel that defies this order will be targeted. So in and of itself clearly suggests that one, if not both of those things, are not being met. Lebanon is obvious. Now, we'll get into whether or not the block eight is in fact still being a, is still a violation as of right now. But it was, as I was telling you. and even Hegsetth watered it down to act like, you know, I'll read you what it says in the actual understanding, which is that there is some kind of a window for how it needs to happen.

Starting point is 01:05:33 But there's no world in which, I'll come back to it. The point is that Trump gave them further concessions if you've already been following along because he wanted Israel not to get bombed by Iran after the last bombing on the 15. And what he gave them, or I think before that, what he gave them was immediate, right? The immediate removal of blockade, immediate standing down of the, What was the other one? It's all the top of my head right now. But the point was that he gave them those concessions.

Starting point is 01:06:00 Not waiting until we signed this, but immediately. Blockade was one of them, and it didn't really move. I said that three days ago. I said, this is going to be why this fails. Iran's foreign ministry spokesman condemned Israel strikes and said Tehran held the U.S. directly responsible, like we've always known, and considered it a violation of the understanding. However, he stopped short of saying that it would suspend the understanding.

Starting point is 01:06:22 Now, as of right now, I believe they have stated there at least on suspended, not removed, but the whole process of 60 days has been paused because of what they're doing. Iran is repeatedly stressed that it also considers Israel's complete withdrawal from Lebanon a central part of the agreement. And everybody knows that. Even Trump has made that clear. So starting with this, here's what Trump said on 845 today. We didn't meet our desperation like I showed you. Iran did. They're finished. We'll go out and play out the 60 days. They get no money. and even Twitter says, well, per Article 6 of the understanding, they get $300 billion in reconstruction, finalizing the 60 days contradicting no money, not 10 cents.

Starting point is 01:07:06 So you can read it one or two ways. Either Trump is saying because of what's happened today, that no more is going to happen. But yet he says in there we'll play out the 60 days. But if you're telling us they've already broke the agreement, why would you do that? Because they're in a position of weakness. Because he already told you as a play for you yet again in a minute, that they would run out of reserves if they didn't stop this. That's what we've always known. They lied about it pretty much everywhere else or even regarding

Starting point is 01:07:31 interceptors or any number of points. So why would he do that? Wouldn't he immediately go, well, we gave you a shot. We knew you were weak. Now we're going to just take over because you won't play the ball. Nope, he's keeping it going because they are the ones with the weak position. And this is what they do. They put out all flash, no substance, right? Department of War comes out and says, no hesitation, no mercy, overwhelming lethality. I mean, God, what a pathetic front. give the enemy nightmares you get just like out of pete heggs says like childhood junior hard draw like

Starting point is 01:08:01 like something he sketched out when he was in junior high it says they gave the enemies 300 billion instead that's twitter making fun of them calling no no you gave them money not nightmares and it's r t calling them out that's got to be pretty frustrating for some of them now don't trump again saying they'll get no money said mohammad morandi says the zionists are massacring lebanese families while Trump confirms he'll keep Iran's frozen assets hostage. The Islamic Republic has proven that the Epstein coalition is deceptive and untrustworthy. Their murderous and reckless policies will soon bring down the global economy. Now, you can just agree with him if you want.

Starting point is 01:08:37 I think he's correct. And I'm about taking aside if it's but what the reality is. He is clearly making this continue because of his hubris or because he's not in control. This will eventually affect the economy to a very catastrophic degree if they keep doing this. Now here is what he has to say about the general perception of the membrane of understanding. Something which we'll go through next to actually read through the actual points, just like we always showed you before, which haven't really changed. And this is even now confirmed by the U.S. government, despite all the lies they've been spinning.

Starting point is 01:09:07 And he wants you to believe this is an unconditional surrender. Why? Because he posted that. That's all he would accept. And now he's going to try to, in a very embarrassing display of mental gymnastics, convince you that that's the same thing. Right now, with all the concessions, that's. also surrender, apparently.

Starting point is 01:09:23 By far, who else could have done a blockade like that? I did a naval blockade. I guess anybody with the Navy. When not one ship was able to get through. Very false. Literally one of the easiest. I mean, they have had to admit that that's not true. China can show you plenty of ships that have gotten through.

Starting point is 01:09:40 Does he know that? I'd like to think, yes. But even if he doesn't, this is what we've gotten used to. Just bald-faced lies about everything. That's what his administration. That should be the tagline of this administration. Some tried. They didn't, you know, didn't last very long.

Starting point is 01:09:55 And it certainly brought Iran to the table more than before. However, how in the world did it do that? They had been willing to negotiate from the very beginning, from the very beginning. Even after the JCPOA and Trump, they were meeting them more than once, and then they murdered Kameenie. Then they still kept meeting them. And then they, I mean, you guys, this is, this is Axios report. So I think you understand why this guy's willing to lie even within his lies. But either way.

Starting point is 01:10:22 Beginning of conflict, you had talked about you only wanted unconditional surrender. And the MOU doesn't look like unconditional surrender. Well, it really probably is unconditional surrender. Yes? I think so. You know, maybe probably kind of is though, right? You know, just run with me on this. Let's just kind of pretend like this is totally unconditional surrender,

Starting point is 01:10:43 even though there's conditions and it's not surrender, you know. But just let me get one. You know, it's like it's just pretty sad, guys. And now what's funny is the Axiot Show, which is, you know, Barack Ravid and the many times they've lied. What's funny is they do, though, well, Iran came to the J-Bel and you're winning. But then clearly the Israel focus is that this is a bad deal, so we have to call it out, even though that's not what the Trump team wants you to say right now.

Starting point is 01:11:05 It's just hard to watch, you know. So here is what the White House on the 18th saying President Donald Trump saw the threat. Washington spent 40 years managing. Iran will never have a nuclear weapon, you know, just like they never did before and always said they wouldn't. but you know you gotta set the bar high right and of course they put this out iran memorandum understanding it's a win for america oil prices plummet well they're still higher than when this started so that's incorrect trump's strength brought ira to the table like i said not true they were already doing that

Starting point is 01:11:38 fighting ends on all front except it's not happening though and even then that if that was the that was largely before this started other than israel and what you were doing iran was not engaged anywhere other than your lies straight and promos is open well it was open before now you gave them control. No U.S. dollars handed Iran. Guys, I promise you that's not going to happen. My opinion, and that's highly disputed, even with people that are largely on my side of all of this. Like people agree with everything I'm saying would dispute that. I saw some pushing back on, you know, the idea that no U.S. money will come from this, even though they're calling out the rest of the deal. Now, I agree, that's how it states. The coalition of the Middle East partners now they're going to fund it.

Starting point is 01:12:15 Well, I mean, my opinion entirely is that I don't see how that works out because none of them are going to want to foot the bill. for what they did, but they might get pressured. But at some point, I feel like this is going to overlap with some kind of tangential manipulation of funds that were in some way coming from American tax dollars. That's just my opinion, though. But to be clear, the $300 million reconstruction fund is supposed to be not U.S. tax dollars. But that shouldn't even be the focal point when the argument is you're giving $300 billion to a group that you just told us were monster terrorists that can't be allowed to exist.

Starting point is 01:12:47 That's pretty stupid. A safer, more prosperous world. Okay. whatever your abstract fantasy. This is sad because you always know it's an obvious win when they have to walk you through why it's a win, right? Let alone use abstract and undefitable claims as reference points and use achievements that were the result, the status quo, before the war started.

Starting point is 01:13:10 But that's what you get. That's what you get. Right now that's what you're getting, is this forced effort. Now let's go through the actual memorandum of understanding and talk about what the points say. So this is the Cabissie letter and you could, this is the actual, you know, written out signed by Donald Trump. That's important, as we'll come back to in a second, because you can see that Donald Trump signed these. And right next to it is the discussion where his signature is of the $300 billion reconstruction fund.

Starting point is 01:13:37 So that's important. But it's he signed the whole thing. Now, guys, this is what's so frustrating is there are people out there that are acting like we don't know this stuff. Now, I'm not saying this is going to stand. Like, I think that's the obvious point is that they probably don't even mean half of this stuff. and arguably Israel is not going to play their part. And I mean, these are dishonest governments. That's not the point is not we know for a fact this is what's going to happen,

Starting point is 01:13:57 but that this is in fact what they're showing Iran and that they're agreeing to, or at least pretending to agree to. And in fact is exactly what we were saying since April, the 10 to the 14, which we talked about, it's the same conversation. And so the people that are trying to scream about how we don't, you know, I guess that people are being misled by some kind of propaganda, a lot of people are, but the data has been clear for a long time. And they're only going to eat crow as it goes continually forward because it's obvious now that

Starting point is 01:14:26 all the things that they said aren't happening. But let's look, this is through Axios, and I think that's actually important because a group that's been caught lying deliberately repeatedly in the interest of the lie around their narrative is the one showing you the report that is, by the way, the same one I just showed you that has been approved by the U.S. government. It's also the report that, you know, if they're the ones on the Israel side of this, that seems they want you to highlight the problems in this deal more than anybody. So it kind of works for the same point, doesn't it?

Starting point is 01:14:54 But either way, it is whether through Axios, through Khabissela, through Iran, through the United States government, this is what they're pointing to. And you guys again, you know this, I'll try to do it quickly. Number one, declare the immediate and permanent termination of military operations on all fronts, including Lebanon. So right out of the gate, Trump signed this, he acknowledged this, and Iran, and this includes Israel. as they've repeatedly stated, and it continues to happen. So alone, right there, don't even need to go any farther. You can already prove that Israel and the United States, that Iran made clear from day one,

Starting point is 01:15:28 were in this together, no matter what they did going forward, is still violating this. So why would Iran uphold their parts of the bargain? Why would they not make clear that that's still being violated? They are. But what you're getting is a lot of people acting like suddenly what they're doing is the violation, when you can objectively prove it with step one that they're lying to you.

Starting point is 01:15:45 Okay, it's very, very simple. Now, this one's number two. The United States of America and Iran undertake to respect each other's sovereignty. I can promise you the U.S. government's going to fail right there. And to refrain from interfering each other's internal affairs. Now, that's going to be an abstract point that they can argue they will, but I guarantee you both sides don't really appeal to that or will actually commit to that. Number three, commit to negotiating and achieving the final deal in a maximum of 60 days.

Starting point is 01:16:15 So just meaning that that's 60 days beyond this initial signing of what they plan to do is when that might actually get signed. And it's extendable by mutual consent. So those that are acting like Trump got a deal and was done are also stupid or lying. The truth is this was a memorandum of understanding about things that they would eventually do and commit to. And yes, with some actionable things that happened, especially since Trump added those extra concessions because he wanted Israel to not be bombed. That's all very real.

Starting point is 01:16:41 But it's still up in the air. It might as well just be assigned, you know, declaration of intent. It's not actually, you know, there's no teeth yet. Immediately upon signing, which allegedly happened electronically, which who knows if that plays some factor going forward, they never met despite what Trump said in regard to in person. Trump went to France. Historically, there's some humorous overlaps there for what the, you know, historical location. But the point was that he signed it there, one in Farsi, one in English, and they did the same, wherever they were. I forget the exact location.

Starting point is 01:17:15 So they did that. And so then, therefore, after that signing of the memorandum of understanding, not the deal necessarily, they will be removed, the removal of the naval blockade and any disturbances or impediments. Now, what it says is they will begin the removal. And it says, and will fully end the naval blockade within 30 days. Now, I think they're abusing that. Now, here's my point, though. Even if it was within 30 days, you could already see as we'll go through in a second,

Starting point is 01:17:43 that that's not actually what was happening. In the beginning anyway. And they called it out. But then what happened was we have, and this is this is, I think the 13, 14, 15th, remember correctly? Is that you had the reality, like I just said, of Trump,

Starting point is 01:17:57 giving that concession to Iran, saying, okay, look, don't bomb them back. We know Israel's bombing Lebanon. I'll talk to them. But we will give you this concession that we will immediately start. We'll immediately do that. We'll immediately send you money.

Starting point is 01:18:08 If you do not, if you don't bomb them. And that's what seems to have happened. And so then they didn't stop the blockade. And so I think that's playing a factor right now. Now, this is number five. Upon the signing, Iran will make arrangements using its best efforts for safe passage of commercial vessels with no charge for 60 days. Only from the Persian Gulf to sea of Vermont. Okay, so read that again.

Starting point is 01:18:30 Because this is the reason this was so deceptively put out and people put their own little, you know, truncated versions of what they said they meant. And deliberate, I mean, two platforms got called out for deliberately manipulating the way these things read. So it says they will make arrangements using its best efforts for safe passage of commercial vessels with no charge. So you can even argue that that might imply that it's not entirely, but I would argue that's manipulative, but with no charge for 60 days, only for the Persian Gulf sea of Oman. So that means a limited scope of where they are able to charge. I think that's pretty clear. And vice versa. The traffic of commercial vessels were immediately start and considering

Starting point is 01:19:10 the need for removing the technical and military obstacles and demining by the Republic of Iran will be instated within 30 days. Now, that point will be pointed out as somehow proof that there were mines. I think it's objectively obvious that there were not. And this was verbiage put in by both sides, you understand. And of course, Iran, the entire time, has played into the idea that they could and have. They could and they have. But you can clearly see that there are no mines in the water because their ships going through China and otherwise as the, you know, multiple people withstanding have argued, even the admiral we talked about from the UK who made the exact argument we're making that by deductive logic, you can clearly see that they did not do it this time. I think that's obvious because like I said,

Starting point is 01:19:51 they didn't have any intention to truly shut the straight down. What? Because they didn't in the beginning. That's why Trump and his team put the blockade in place because they needed it to be shut down for a number of their own agendas and then blame Iran. But either way, the point was that the block A carcade charging dynamic is not supposed to be in effect. There are arguments of that happening as best I can tell that hasn't happened yet. Definitive mutually agreed plan with at least $300 billion for the reconstruction and economic development of Iran. No matter how you spend that and tons of people in his administration, even like Ted Cruz

Starting point is 01:20:24 and people on Trump's side arguably, ostensibly, are screaming about how that's wrong matter what. Now, if we're going to be honest about this, they started an illegal war and they destroyed their society. They murdered tons of people. I don't know if $300 billion is appropriate, but it makes sense that this would be something that would be done if you believe that it's their responsibility to rebuild what they cause. I mean, I think a pretty basic. I mean, my general opinion is that I think this causes more problems than not because the time frame and how long goes on. There's there's right. There's opportunity for fraud from every side. But either way, in a general sense,

Starting point is 01:20:59 not going bad guy, good guy. Of course it makes sense. But understanding that from Trump's scenario, these are monster terrorists who want to hate you for your freedom and kill every Jew in the world. But here's $300 billion to rebuild your Jew-hating monster society or whatever they want to frame it as. Or the idea that giving them billions that they stole from them back is the same point. If that's not what I think Iran is, I think you can prove that's not what Iran is. Not that a good guy, bad guy. All these governments are, I think, are controlling our lives, but they're not what they make them out to be. I've said that my entire life.

Starting point is 01:21:28 And the truth is that that shows you that they know that, guys. They know that. They've been using these narratives to get you into a place of acquiescence, doing whatever they want. It's just not true. And in the meantime, they're killing people just like you and your family right over there in Iran because of their agenda. Number seven, the United States of America undertakes to terminate all types of sanctions against Iran, including United Nations, International Atomic Energy Agency. So stop all the sanctions.

Starting point is 01:21:55 But I thought they were evil doers, Trump. I thought they had to be killed and stopped. Conditional surrender. But here's money and removal of sanctions. and you can sell oil and you can control the straight. I mean, come on, guys, it's laughable that anybody could frame this as anything other than an absolute surrender for Donald Trump. The Islamic Republic of Iran affirms that it shall not procure or develop nuclear weapons.

Starting point is 01:22:16 Guys, that's the most basic point. I told you for the beginning, like anybody, a lot of us were, that he seemed like he was already angling towards ending it by pointing out that he got back what was already happening. We're opening the straight. No nukes were the two main talking points. those two things were the same before. Now, even if you argue that Ron was lying about it. Well, so what's the difference?

Starting point is 01:22:36 Now they're promising not to. They were promising not to before. So it doesn't matter how you spin this. All you got was the same narrative. He just wants you to somehow think that they were going, we love nukes and now we promise not to. Nobody thinks that, guys, other than liars that want to pretend they do.

Starting point is 01:22:50 It's obvious right now. Ron's agreed to resolve the disposition of stockpiled enriched material. And this is interesting. Pursuant to a mechanism that will be mutual. agreed upon in accordance with the schedule mentioned in the above paragraph, which simply means that it will happen the schedule on a part of the final deal, meaning it comes in stages.

Starting point is 01:23:12 And it says, with the minimum methodology to be downblending on site, under the supervision of the, okay, so they do still have a program. They do still have a nuclear program for civilian, just like they did before. And on top of this, the reality that they're going to, under supervision of the I, the International Atomic Energy Agency, so nothing new. Same as before. They're going to be downgrading it, just like was originally promised on the 28 before they bombed them anyway.

Starting point is 01:23:41 Same point. Nothing changed. In fact, it was all promised before. And in reality, had they taken the agreement that they were offering on the 28th, that's what I find most interesting about this. This is on the 28th that foreign minister of Vermont was telling you, we're within reach a piece. They offered to give up their enrichment, give up their program.

Starting point is 01:23:57 They'd never done those two before. Now, the difference now, Had they agreed then, they would have gotten no program and given up their enrichment, meaning arguably what they had on site would have been downgraded like they said, but ultimately removed and same with the ones they could do now. That's not the same deal. Over there you had none. Over here, you have some.

Starting point is 01:24:16 I think you guys can piece together which one's worse in your mind or whatever you want to think of as worse, you know, which one allows them to have some, which one allows them to have none. Kind of seems obvious, doesn't it? My argument is the same. Every country has the right to the civilian nuclear program, so I'm not seeing this as a problem. But for those that see this as the evildoer, you're giving them the very material you said, come on, you got to stop lying yourselves if you think this is what Trump told you. The two parties also agreed to discuss the issue of enrichment and other mutually agreed matters

Starting point is 01:24:43 related to Iran's nuclear needs based on a satisfactory framework being agreed upon the final deal, meaning that right now they're making all these concessions of giving money and chain, and they haven't even put a fine point on whether or not they can continue to enrich. and I'll play this for you right now. Here's Trump admitting to you. Oh, actually, hold on. Did I miss that? I guess I didn't download that.

Starting point is 01:25:07 That's weird. Let me grab this real quick. This is Trump admitting to you that he is, the very least, on the, about, you know, of the mind that they have a right now to have a civilian program. You know, just like anybody honest was already telling you because they do. It is their legal right like every other government to have a civilian nuclear program. And so what Trump is essentially saying now, like with the ballistic missiles in the same point, is well, you know, they have a right to, just like their neighbors do.

Starting point is 01:25:32 Yeah, you heard that on TLAV over the last 10 years. So why is it saying it now? Well, because he failed. Because he failed to convince you that that had to happen. And so now he's trying to walk it back. So you think he's on your side or you think he was right from the beginning or whatever you think that leans into, here he is like we already showed you. Maybe not.

Starting point is 01:25:50 Iran's position has always been that their nuclear program was for civilian purposes. If they come back after the signing of this and say they want to continue to have a civilian nuclear program is that acceptable to you well i've said to them always i say look you have probably the third largest oil reserves in the world what the hell do you need nuclear for you need nuclear for some electricity so so i've always felt that way so we've been pretty tough in that you know it's also it is a little hard though when you say that somebody wants it other people have it other adjoining states have it oh yeah you know me you mean like anybody honest was already telling you right that they have a right to and so do they have

Starting point is 01:26:28 there and so are they over there. So is everybody. And you're not letting them have it for purposes of electricity or things like that. It's always a little tough. You have to use a little common sense. Oh, cool. Trump's now finally under common sense. I mean, how insulting is that? He's calling common sense the thing he's been shouting down since you got in this position for the second time. The whole time. No nuclear, no nuke. Of course, no nuke is the point. But if you listen to their conversations, his entire administration, including him on multiple occasions has said no nuclear program more than once. So now he's making it clear, well, you know, everyone has a right to it.

Starting point is 01:27:06 Okay. So we're right back in square one. Two parties agreed to discuss the issue of enrichment. So that's going to come up and I promise you it's going to be what you're hearing unless Israel drives us further. Number nine, pending the final deal, the United States of America and Iran agree to maintain the status quo. Let's let that sink in.

Starting point is 01:27:25 The Islamic Republic of Iran will maintain the current status quo. of its nuclear program. Okay. And the United States of America will not impose any new sanctions and will not deploy additional forces in the region. So what's the status quo, you ask, of a nuclear program?

Starting point is 01:27:40 That's the current reality of their civilian nuclear program. So Trump has now agreed, as of nine of their own agreement, that they have the right to continue the nuclear program that Trump has spent his entire time saying has to stop.

Starting point is 01:27:52 You can't see in more obvious loss. This is like saying You have to, you know, I don't know, you pick it. Not occupy this country. All or nothing. You can't be there. And then a sign a deal that says, okay, you're allowed to be there. We got everything we wanted.

Starting point is 01:28:08 That's what he's doing. The United States of America undertakes that immediately upon signing of the deal, the memorandum, rather, the Department of Treasury will issue waivers for the export of Iranian crude oil, petroleum and products, derivatives, and all associated services, including banking, transactions, insurance, transportation, you know, what they should have always been allowed to do because they're another country like anybody else. And then the U.S. government has been illegally stopping them. But the point is, we're now going to let you do all this.

Starting point is 01:28:33 You can sell the oil that we've been stopping because terrorism. So now you support the terrorism, or are you admitting they're not actually engaging in terrorism? You take your pick. The United States of America undertakes to make fully available for use the frozen or restricted funds and assets of Iran upon the implementation of memorandum understanding. That is the $24, give or take billion dollars that they have frozen. That is Iran's money. Now what we're going to get into is the reality that right now there is an amount that's in

Starting point is 01:29:02 Cutter, I believe it was Cutter. I'll come back to it. Really quickly. Yes, in Qatar. We'll come back to that in a second. But that money was there because of a previous discussion, you know, a move that Biden's administration took and never left. And so as of right now, that money appears to have already gone to them under the discussion

Starting point is 01:29:22 of this. And that came from those three concessions that Trump gave in the middle of that stop. So all this talk about not giving them all contingent on whether they apply this or that, well, not really as it appears. But in some cases, yes, but that still doesn't change the fact that you're giving them concessions

Starting point is 01:29:36 when you told us that wouldn't happen. Include this for you. Always important to watch this again, guys, understand how clear this was and how clearly this, what they could have had on the 28th is better than what they currently do, are doing.

Starting point is 01:29:50 Now here is J.D. Vans. Are they being allowed to sell oil without making concrete nuclear commitments? How is that not lopsided? And he says, they've made very concrete nuclear commitments. They haven't committed to destruction of their highly rich stockpile. That's what Vance is saying. I just showed you.

Starting point is 01:30:08 Guys, this is, and this is the game they're playing. They are lying right to your face. Oh my God, I know you're shocked, right? Like they've never done that before. He's lying to you. Or he's being lied to. That's always the two possibilities. But they're trying to convince you that what they have written down is not the case.

Starting point is 01:30:25 and then we showed you this one already. The idea that he's telling you, well, they have a right to have a civilian program. Yep, they do. But here is Huckabee. So remember, we have the Lebanon issue and we have the blockade. The two main things that seem to be the issue for Iran,

Starting point is 01:30:41 like we told you they would months ago, are the current issue for why the memorandum signing or agreement is somehow being, or rather, what's the word I used, that's causing a problem for the agreement. but it says Hezbo has received assurances from Iran that no final nuclear agreement with the United States will be signed unless Israel withdraws from Lebanon.

Starting point is 01:31:03 Yep, like everybody knows. That was on the 16th. But of course, Israel first Mike Huckabee says, fortunately Rubio made clear that Iran and Hezbollah aren't linked in a deal. What does that have to do with anything? Rubio can say whatever once out loud. Might as well be Lindsey Graham.

Starting point is 01:31:20 They made an agreement. Trump signed it. They signed it. What the hell does that have to do with anything? They're just trying to lie. Israel doesn't need Iran permission to defend itself. This guy is not an America first person. He is not on the side of you, at least when it comes to Israel first. Now, here's the crazy part. That's Mike Huckabee, the U.S. ambassador to Israel, telling you Lebanon's not part of the deal. Well, here's Mr. Trump. Lebanon's part of the deal.

Starting point is 01:31:45 The United States is committed to beast, which is absurd. We expect a complete ceasefire on all fronts, including Lebanon, Hezbollah, Israel. Donald Trump, both White House Twitter. Twitter account and true social. Now just on a quick side note, Rand Paul has been out there weirdly defending Trump all day going, he's committed to peace and posting stuff like this. I know Rand Paul is not stupid enough to think this man or anything they're doing is about peace. But yet there he is.

Starting point is 01:32:11 And as I tweeted myself, let's not forget Rand is not wrong, guys. It's not, it's frustrating to me that he's out there trying to shout people down for recognizing that this is not what it appears to be. Just think that's worth pointing out, guys. Now, in regard to Lebanon, I think let's go into that quickly and show you what's actually happening today and over the last couple days before we talk about the blockade still being there, or at least it was as of early today yesterday. Here's your reminder that Israel violated the ceasefire since day one, Medio Citt writes, and has been escalating since then.

Starting point is 01:32:42 And by the way, way, way before that, the point is in the context of this current conversation. But as he would also point out, you go back before October 7th. You go back since the 80s, guys. Israel's been occupying legally Lebanon for a long time and has continued to violate if and when they have ceasefires every time they have. Like I was showing you post October 7th with Craig Murray on the ground going, look, they're bombing right now.

Starting point is 01:33:05 No narrative, no justification. And they're supposed to be a ceasefire. Lebanon has the right to defend itself, you rights? I agree. Now, his point is, here's a reminder that they violated it since the very beginning. Lebanese army, right? So technically not even on the side of Hesbola and the real sense of things. that's more nuanced than that, but Lebanese government specifically, reports Israeli ceasefire

Starting point is 01:33:26 violations shortly after it takes effect. And let's be clear, guys, they've in fact bombed the Lebanese army, whether by action or by design, or bombed Lebanese, I mean, bombing in the middle of Beirut. Those are Lebanese people living in these apartments, not Hezbo, either way, guys. The point is that they are saying they've been bombing them during a ceasefire the moment it started. And every day since, here's the ambassador from Israel saying, here's your reminder how Hezbollah is upholding the ceasefire in the last couple of that couple days. You can go through this list.

Starting point is 01:33:57 June 17th, June 18th. Find the earliest possible coverage. Midnight on the 17th and you'll find Israel bombing Lebanon all the way through. And then God forbid they should respond to Israel bombing them. This is what you get from these kind of monsters. Drop site news. This is as of today. Yesterday, excuse me.

Starting point is 01:34:16 At least 30 civilians have been killed since midnight in a wave of Israel. rarely attacks, all while they're being told a ceasefire needs to start. Trump says they have to stop, and this is what they do instead. Murder people on purpose. All across southern Lebanon, local journalist, Hottie Hoteet reports. Press TV correspondent, more than 25 residential sites were hit by airstrikes. 25 drone attacks, artillery fire. Deliberately bombing civilian locations, these are some of the people that were killed.

Starting point is 01:34:46 Blight of the Sun, which if you want to know, some of the stories that have, whether we're talking about butterfly bullets or cans that are made to look like children's toys that explode, Israel's been doing this since I've been covering what they've been doing. A weapon designed to specifically maim and killed children. Illegal under Geneva conventions for numerous reasons, including being disguised as an ordinary object and being specifically targeted against civilians. A war crime of the highest order. And this is not new, guys.

Starting point is 01:35:14 They've been doing this as long as I've been covering this. Look, Abby Martin's work has been covering this as long as I've seen her working on. this. A cluster bomb shaped like a small football in South Lebanon. And this is the reality. Do you do diligence, it's very real and it's not new. There's multiple examples of this. Like I said, or having drones that act like

Starting point is 01:35:32 crying children that draw people out and they can kill them. That's been documented by human rights groups. We're using little cans that are made to look like food. Have cartoons drawn the side of them. I've seen it myself. And they are bombs. So children get killed. Here's Ben Gavir.

Starting point is 01:35:48 Just in case you thought maybe that wasn't real. Here's what he said out loud today. For every tear of an Israeli mother, a thousand Lebanese mothers must weep. All of Lebanon must burn. With all due respect to the Americans, Israel must make it clear to the entire world that the blood of our sons and the security of our citizens are not forfeit. All of Lebanon must burn. Our supreme duty is to protect the citizens of Israel and the soldiers of the IDF. And this commitment takes precedence over every other consideration.

Starting point is 01:36:18 I told the Prime Minister, even in our private meetings, for every tier of an Israeli mother, a thousand Lebanese mothers must weep. Enough with the ping pong. The Middle East, you don't win with measured responses and restraint. You need to go berserk, to obliterate, to crush the terror. Now, yes, that's getting called out by almost everybody, even people, even some of the most radical people in Israel. You know, why?

Starting point is 01:36:41 Because he went too far. Not that they don't agree, many of them, but because he's showing the true face of what they really are. And I'm saying that's every Israeli. I'm definitely not every Jewish person, but it is a huge reality in Israel. And there's an obvious Jewish supremacy that takes place on the surface. But it is Zionism that's driving this. Either way, this is what you're talking about. This is what we're dealing with. And we're going to pretend that he's not outright telling you murder everybody. You all know this. And if we're clear, Netanyahu, Ben-Gavir, most of the Israeli government are varying shades of

Starting point is 01:37:17 of the same insanity. Geopolitics. Iran's foreign minister Argoschee responds to Ben Gavir, saying that. This is not a rant by a random genocidal lunatic. It's a public post by the national security minister of the Israeli regime. The genocidal death cult headquartered in Tel Aviv is a threat to all of humanity. It threatens all humans. Its only interest is permanent war.

Starting point is 01:37:42 And it is currently influencing, if not occupying the U.S. government. Now, as of last I checked, Israel was still bombing Lebanon. On the 19th of June, even as Trump is saying those things, not really hard to misunderstand. So from Iran's perspective, there's an undeniable violation of the agreement, even according to what Trump agreed to. No confusion there. Men Press News points out that you have, this is the basically nonstop Hezboa rocket waves were being fired at the Israeli forces as they were trying to advance. Now, I get the sense that was because they were trying to. diminish the amount of bombing because of what Trump said, but then apparently they got

Starting point is 01:38:20 annihilated and went back to bombing anything they could see. That's what you get. A bunch of child murdering bombs from afar because these people can't even stand up against anything. And that's historically accurate. Look what Robert's been covering. That's not some kind of knock on anything other than the IDF. And the truth is, guys, that they have shown you that. Look at what they did in Gaza. And so the truth is, guys, they went back to bombing everything and hurting anyone they could. here's Zach Foster pointing out Israel yesterday using white phosphorus for the I mean infinite amount of times we've seen this happen human rights watch and the international all of them have reported even Bethlehem that they've used white phosphorus in the daytime in public displays over civilian areas those are chemical warfare that's a crime against humanity that's a chemical warfare nobody seems to care first one that pops up here you go human rights watch Israel used white phosphorus and Gaza and Lebanon, October 12th. You can go back way before that, too.

Starting point is 01:39:28 So talking about the blockade, now I saw right after the show yesterday, because we were talking about this and whether or not the blockade, because as far as I could tell, from Iran's perspective and even according to the U.S. government, even sent com, it had still been effect all the way until June 18th later in the day. Now, in the middle of the day, about noon, it says today U.S. forces lifted the blockade.

Starting point is 01:39:51 So we had just, we went live about noon, so I hadn't seen that as 1225. So after the show, I said, well, since we went live, sent com has posted the blockade has been officially removed. At this point, I would not take anything at face value from any government. Either way, Lebanon is still being bombed by Israel. Seems clear to me. Now, what I find interesting is it appears that didn't actually stop, at least according to Iran.

Starting point is 01:40:14 No, this is in the New York Post, not, I mean, pretty easily one of the least trustworthy platforms in corporate media right now, I argue, just because of their clearly have a partisan agenda. Iran foreign ministry says straight of her moose is open after Argyz he warned it was closed. Now, even that is ridiculous. Like if you take a step back and look at this, what you will find is that Iran's foreign ministry said that it was open because this is the deal they made. Then the idea was it was closed because they violated the agreement.

Starting point is 01:40:42 But of course, you can flate that and make it sound like Iran is confused with their own direction. That's what they do. The confusion is what your job is to create. post, but I can easily prove the timeline for you. And so actually, that's a good place to note, good place to note this. I wanted to say this in general. I find it important.

Starting point is 01:40:59 It maybe should have done at the beginning. But what you'll get right now, which is really, I think just a product of how bad they are, but it works in their favor sometimes. For example, we'll be reporting this stuff. And you'll be a, you know, Iran has finally accepted the agreement or something. And so we report on cautiously, right? Who knows what's going to happen? And then the day goes by, you know, two days go by.

Starting point is 01:41:18 And of course, since then, like we're seeing, like, hypothetically, you know, suddenly there's a problem and Iran says, no, you violated this, we have no agreement. Okay, then three days goes by and all of a sudden it's breaking news. Iran accepts the ceasefire and I go, whoa, okay, that's crazy. I wouldn't have expected that. And you open it and it's Fox or CNN or MSNBC reporting the story from three days ago or even 24 hours ago when everything has changed.

Starting point is 01:41:41 And so what happens is you get people that aren't tapped in who are getting these reports, breaking news, so and so. And it's something that has already changed. And 24 hours later, you get, you know, the tale reports from the ones that share from CNN Fox News who report breaking news, Iran. And it's already changed three times since then. And this, this, so you've almost got this weird thing where the corporate media is like deliberately behind the story so they can maintain the line.

Starting point is 01:42:06 I mean, I don't know how to read that. But it happens every time. And so back to this point, that's what I think this is, right? Because what you get is the straight open after the alleged agreement, because that's what was the deal, right? because they were going to move the blockade and things would go back to normal. And there would be 60 days until there was a toll. And then, well, they said, well, you're still bombing Lebanon.

Starting point is 01:42:26 And it looks like we can see that your blockade isn't technically fully removed. So that's when they said it was closed. Not really confusing. Traffic through the Strait of Formoose is flowing under Iran's monitoring. According to near post, after a radio message to vessel. And of course, this funny, under Iran's monitoring. They frame it like that, even though, yeah, that was the agreement that you're, your leader put out there after a radio message to vessels in the region suggested the waterway

Starting point is 01:42:52 had been closed over tensions with Israel. You see, just the fact that you conflate them in the first sentence, there's an entire day of narrative right there. They said it was open under their monitoring because that was the deal. Then when they never followed through with their part of the agreement, Iran later that day said, well, now we're stopping it, which is where we are now. I don't know if that's bad journalism or deliberate conflation to confuse people. Either one makes sense to me with this platform. forces of Iran, it says, in accordance with the memorandum of understanding to end the war on June 18, have taken the necessary measures to ensure the safe passage of commercial vessels through the strait and shipping in this route is currently underway, says Iran's foreign ministry.

Starting point is 01:43:30 Earlier, the Revolution Guard statement read over maritime radio channels warned vessels from entering the strait because the U.S. was in violation. Now, yes, had you gotten a notification from some news channel that said that's what they agreed to and assumed that was happening right then, you might have mixed those two things up. But what you can easily understand coming from June 18th is that this is the statement that was circulating since June 18th in the middle of the day. Right?

Starting point is 01:43:55 That's obvious. And that now we're open. Now, because you happen to see that second does not make that the reality. Guys, I'm telling you, we can easily prove the timing of this. And so what happened after that was then then later, from the later on the 18th to today, they said you are now violating the ceasefire. And they stopped it.

Starting point is 01:44:13 I just want to really point out how bad and almost deliberately dishonest some of these partisan media is. Now here's the statement. Since Israel's withdrawal from Lebanon, the complete lifting of the naval blockade, and the withdrawal of American terrorist forces from the Persian Gulf and the region are among the main conditions

Starting point is 01:44:30 of the agreement. The straight will remain closed until these conditions are met. All ships are requested for the sake of their security and safety not to approach the straight any vessels where he read this. So again, if you understand this and you get into the information,

Starting point is 01:44:46 within this, it seems pretty clear that there was an issue with the blockade itself. And what we know is that they've stated that there was a, I guess a reluctance to do it. Even Hegseth said that we'll bomb them the second they don't do what they're supposed to. So there's clearly some level of kind of a half-hearted removal of those things. But again, even without that, they're bombing Lebanon and that didn't change. But I believe that there's both of those things happening. And this is J.D. Vance saying that there will be no agreement with Iran if they charge tolls. Well, as Miranda says, well, Iran will definitely charge tolls because that's actually part of the agreement.

Starting point is 01:45:24 The Trump regime should not test Iran's resolve. Now, again, the argument was it wasn't supposed to happen until after a certain period of time, but we'll see if they violated it if they do it anyway. White Al says oil is flowing and gas prices have begun tumbling down below $4. And the same old thing, the insane stupidity of their administration. Here we are. That was where we were when oil prices shot. up because of the war and now they're there. I mean, it's changed since then. The point was,

Starting point is 01:45:53 this is generally the reality of it. You can look for yourself. And so for them to go, oh my God, it came down so much. It's a deception, guys. We're still higher right now than before this started. Last I checked, it was what, 75, 76? I'm willing to bet you with the current situation. It's going to go back up. But here's the clip I think it's worth seeing. We played this yesterday with Charlie of Trump and the lie on March 9th, the lie on April 1st, and then, or I mean, you can read it as the lies first than the truth or the truth and then the lie. Either way, one of them has to be a lie. And here he is telling you that if we didn't get this deal done, that oil reserves would run out. Everything's breaking Trump's way.

Starting point is 01:46:33 Oh, hold on. Yeah, I totally must have mixed this up today. Let me grab this real quick. Since I started playing that, I'll just, we can laugh about it before we get to it, is that what you're going to see is, as you heard, things are breaking Trump's way. Jesse Waters, very embarrassingly comes up. on to tell you that every single think Trump promised, every one of them has now come true. I'm not making that up. This is my point about these people.

Starting point is 01:47:02 Like, does Jesse really think that? And if he does, then how can he be, I mean, how can you be that bad at your job? Or if he doesn't, then how is he really to embarrass himself like that? I think some of these people are in this, not because they even care about reputation. Either way. Thanks us, we have so much oil. We have tremendous oil and gas. much more than we need.

Starting point is 01:47:24 We're now totally independent of the Middle East, and yet we are there to help. We don't have to be there. We don't need their oil. We don't need anything they have. I'm going to get bad press. I know that. Now, if I did the opposite, if I went out and continued to bomb them for another four, just bomb the hell out of them, I'd get bad press on that.

Starting point is 01:47:46 No, there's nothing I can do. But what this does is it allows the ships to go. If we keep bombing, those ships won't be going. And you're talking about $500, $600, $700 million a day. It's a lot of money, a lot of money. That's why the world is okay. It's liquid. It's fine.

Starting point is 01:48:05 Also, we run out of reserves in about four weeks. You know, there are reserves all over the world, and we would really run out. And there'll be a time when you wouldn't be able to get it, and you want to see Bedlam? So for all those so-called geniuses that want to show me how smart they are. Well, no matter how you want to look at this, the end of the day, what it means is Iran had the leverage.

Starting point is 01:48:25 And that's what everybody was pointing out. You can't deny this, guys, because even he's. Now, again, you could argue he's lying right there, but then it made he's a liar then. Your choice. But the reality is quite obvious. And I think that this is demonstrating that they were forced into it because of their bad planning or because they were tricked or because Netanyahu got Trump to do his bidding. At the end of the day, this is Trump trying to make this look like what he wants because

Starting point is 01:48:50 they did not succeed. And this is what's even more embarrassing. This is from the 17th. This happened a couple days before as well. Remember, on the 14th, 15th, when the leak came out through corporate media and Trump said, that's fake news. And all of his followers came out and his blind team sport followers.

Starting point is 01:49:06 Came out and said, that's a lie. How dare you trust the corporate media. And then it came out and weird. It was exactly the same. And now on the 17th, that was going around again. And it was coming from people that directly from his administration. And he tried again to call it fake. right this moment, you can prove that this is exactly what it is.

Starting point is 01:49:24 So why would he lie about that? Because he knew that you would know that he lost. It's pretty clear. The supposed text of the memorandum understanding that was obtained by CNN does not reflect the language in the actual, well, you can read it for yourself. It's identical to what we just showed you. And that's not some benefit. It's not because CNN is good at his job. It's because everyone pointed to it.

Starting point is 01:49:47 And you don't need to elaborate. You don't need to lie about this. in and of itself is very damaging for Trump. And yes, it is $300 billion at least in construction funds. And he goes, it's false. People, you can invest if you want. What I'm going to do, say, nobody ever allowed to invest. So this is the game that even Vance is trying to play.

Starting point is 01:50:04 So you write down, we'll make sure you get at least $300 billion. Fine, investments, whatever you want to call it. And then acting like we say that as I'm all fake because, well, anybody can invest if they want to. I mean, do they really think we're that stupid? Maybe. Or that's just the best. best they can do. We're not investing. We're not putting up 10 cents. Sure, maybe. We'll find out when we get there. I have a feeling that it's not going to be nothing. People can decide to do that,

Starting point is 01:50:32 but that's up to them. Okay, that's irrelevant. So you're saying no matter what you did, this would happen? No, it's happening because of your agreement that you conceded. So yes, you were making this happen. So to pretend it's just random people investing, it shows you how weak of a person he is. You can't even own this. You have to lie about it because you can't own the reality. That's just pathetic, in my opinion. I mean, people lose, guys. You don't always win. You know, the idea that he can't just admit that is so sad. We are not investing in it. We do not have a fund. Okay. Like you would need to start your own fund to be able to give money to a group funding that. A false story that got picked up incorrectly from a statement that was pretty

Starting point is 01:51:13 well made, I think. He has to like pat himself on the back as he's saying is, it's a statement that I made that was pretty great, but it's false. Huh? It's just, that guy's struggling. It really obviously. And so here's the Cabici letter listing off the same thing. And this is the U.S. has released the text of the 14. It's the same points CNN was pointing out, the same points that Axios had, and the same points that we've been showing you since April or, you know, variation between the 10 and then the 14. But since April, they had those 10 points that we've been showing you.

Starting point is 01:51:43 And that's those 10 plus the 4 that were added and that we covered it since then with the 14. In every single time since, we're saying this is the same point that Iran is saying they want. And look at where we are. Surprise, surprise. Those are the points that they're doing. Had you watched the show two months ago, you'd already actually know where we are. Surprise, surprise, demonstrating our value. But here is what Jesse Waters has to say.

Starting point is 01:52:07 This is cringy is a good word for it. Everything's breaking Trump's way. Iran's nuclear ambitions are told. Oh, my God. You know what I didn't even notice? I'll start it again. look at the look at the graphic trump world order come on everything's breaking trump's way iran's nuclear ambitions are toast their military's been throttled and their economy sustained a trillion

Starting point is 01:52:34 dollars in damage yeah so so their little fun state department numbers tell you i guarantee they sustained a lot of damage i doubt that's the reality and even if it was they still somehow managed to come out ahead every objective trump laid out on the very first day of the war has been achieved. Oh, yeah. What about the ballistic missiles? Oh, yeah, that didn't happen. Oh, what about the ending of the nuclear program?

Starting point is 01:52:55 Oh, that didn't happen. What about stopping them entirely? That didn't happen. Regime change? No. Surrender? No. What did happen, Jesse?

Starting point is 01:53:02 The straight's open again. The nuclear, oh, no, not nuclear, I guess. I mean, how do you even say that with a straight face? But because Iran's a police state and severely wounded, they're cherry picking from the term sheet. Oh, is that what's happening? Cherry picking from the term sheet? Like, I just read through the end.

Starting point is 01:53:19 entire thing. How exactly could you stand there knowing, I mean, guys, this has to mean that he's either that bad or he thinks his audience is that stupid. And spinning that they're getting all this money up front. I'll get into that. As part of a PR campaign. Well, even if it's not up front, they're still giving it to them.

Starting point is 01:53:38 So your whole line is that we didn't just do it up front. But you said surrender, regime change, get rid of them, no news, we'll give them all that. They can stay. We'll let them sell oil. And then they better deliver, or we won't give them $300 billion. We win. I mean, come on. To save face. Wow. You know, sometimes I just really, as much as I think they're ridiculous and bad, I feel bad for them sometimes. Because you just wonder if they truly don't know that they're wrong.

Starting point is 01:54:06 As they say, lie right to your face without shame. Now here, interestingly contrast is Ben Shapiro. Now, the reason again, I think this is interesting is because not that Ben Shapiro should be listened to or trusted, but this is the line right here. So you've got the clownish, ridiculous team sport liar for Trump and the, I guess the fake America. I mean, how would you even frame that? The fake maga patriot side that lines with Trump. Then you've got the fake America first pro-Israel side that pretends the line with Trump. And that's all been kind of one blob of team sport politics for Trump.

Starting point is 01:54:36 But now there's been a crack down the middle. And I'm not even talking about the full GOP like Republican side. That broke off a long time ago. This is the team sport right that circles around Trump. That's broken in half because half. that or more is fighting for Israel, but against U.S. interests. So you can see Ben Shapiro on the obvious side of the Israel firsters. So now suddenly, even though they've been driving, everything Trump's been doing has been the greatest

Starting point is 01:55:00 and we're winning and we're getting Iran, suddenly he makes an agreement with them and now everything is wrong because it's not what Israel wants. When these people have been gaslighting you to support no matter what Trump does, even when it's stupid. So that's the anomaly. Suddenly he does something else and they just go, no, no, bad, because Israel doesn't like it. you don't need to explain that. They're not on the side of Trump when it comes to Israel.

Starting point is 01:55:22 Rather, they're only on the side of Israel at the expense of everybody else. But they'll be on Trump's side as long as he fulfills Israel's agenda. That's what I look at it as. But so the point is nonetheless, here's Ben Shapiro challenging what Jesse Waters just told you. I thought they were on the same side. Well, I've said many times the president deciding to go into Iran and to hit nuclear facilities in Operation Midnight Hammer and then to go after Iran's ballistic missile facilities, nuclear facilities, army, Navy, and force in this current operation was the signal act of political bravery perhaps of my lifetime.

Starting point is 01:55:54 Right. The illegal war against Iran, the bombing of a girl's school was the single act of bravery and is like, gosh, guys, what a clown in this case. With that said, this MOU appears to be just from the text, a disaster that does not achieve any of the actual signal goals that were set by the administration at the beginning. Now think about how you could possibly. So Ben Shapiro right here saying nothing was accomplished, Trump said. Bet Jesse Waters, on the same team, is going everything come ever wanted has come true. Well, guess what, guys?

Starting point is 01:56:22 These two people will lie about anything that they want for their side. That's partisan politics for you. For effectively five goals that were set by the administration at the beginning. One was ending the nuclear program, not just nuclear weapons, no nuclear enrichment, zero enrichment. Yep. That is not in the deal. It's not only not in the deal. It allows them, it seems, a civilian program.

Starting point is 01:56:41 Ballistic missiles ended. That is not in the deal. And the president today suggested that ballistic missiles should actually continue to be held by the Iranians because the Saudis, our allies also hold ballistic missiles. Also because it's their legal right, you absolute moron. I should say that. You know, the guy clearly knows that. It's dishonesty, really. You deceiving person. It's the right. So what's your argument? Because they're bad guys. That's his actual argument because they do bad things. Well, good luck trying to make that same argument. Look at what the U.S. is, look at what Israel's doing. Look what the U.S.

Starting point is 01:57:10 is doing. It's just, it's not even worth getting into the debate because he will have a hyperbolic false argument he's trying to convince people of because he has an agenda. You want to have a good time trying to compare the long track record of all the evils that this government's conducted, and then good luck trying to compare even, I say it every time, if you take every single claim they've ever made about Iran your entire life and pretend it's all true even though most of it's not, compare that to just what we can prove that we know the U.S. government has been responsible for. not both them together, even, just the U.S. governor, just Israel, and just what we can literally prove, not even the full picture, which is way worse, and you compare those two things.

Starting point is 01:57:48 It's unbelievably one-sided. The U.S. and Israel have done so much more evil in the world, it'll blow your mind. And I'm not talking about things we're guessing at. I'm talking about things we can prove compared to even what they allege Iran has done, and it doesn't even come close. Good luck, I mean, go through that. And good luck trying to make it out to be one, you know, that the U.S. is out there fighting for freedom. I mean, it's just insulting to your intelligence.

Starting point is 01:58:10 Then you have the support of terrorism. That is not part of the deal. Anything that looks like... What he means is they're not allowed to support their regional allies. And why that's a stupid thing to argue in the first place. So they're allowed to continue to support anybody they want. He's not okay with that. Like an attempt to end terrorism, a permanent opening of the straight of Hormuz told free.

Starting point is 01:58:28 Not only is that not in the deal, the deal appears... You get the point, guys. He goes through the same... Oh, nope, Trump's lied about everything. Doesn't that seem interesting to you? It really should. Because it just shows you something broke. it's only there's only one obvious anomaly here that he's on the side of israel more so than

Starting point is 01:58:44 Trump it's very easy to see and that's why people are waking up to this. Alex Brousowitz says he's talking and this is actually interesting to me. So this is the same conversation, right? You've got these people like Eli Yucoby, a fake America firster who's literally blindly pro-Israel. But because Trump's agenda was pro-Israel, they acted like they were on the same team. Now, suddenly, these guys are not on the same team. And so what's funny is this Alex guy who at least, ostensibly as America First, says, you told me yesterday that you participate in some paid campaigns.

Starting point is 01:59:13 Say it ain't so, you covey, obviously. A lot of your post took look similar to content I know other influencers paid to share about the situation in the UK. And I agree that's an important issue worth raising awareness about the migrant rape issue in the UK is terrible. It's stopped anywhere. It's happening, yes. But make sure we're very clearly showing the difference between propaganda campaigns conducted on the back of narratives that are in some cases true versus the actual reality that we're ignoring around the world. But it says, that said, I'm having trouble believing that all of your criticisms of Bance and Trump and the Iran deal are completely organic. What?

Starting point is 01:59:48 So, you know, funny how he links the caveat. We know we're agreed and you're right over there, but, you know, the guy's a manipulator. So maybe you should reflect on all of the narratives he's pushing. Just a thought, Alex. But Glenn says, good to see that people close to Trump's innermost circle understand that a lot of these influencers who demanded war with Iran and are not now attacking him for stopping the war are actually loyal and captive to Israel, not the U.S., including the I do not feel safe, whiner. I think it's important to see. Now, that doesn't mean either of them are on your side, but it just simply shows you that

Starting point is 02:00:23 it shows you that neither of them are. There's a break between them when what they want is something against your interests. But here is the White House. Same thing. There is no $300 billion payment to Iran by the U.S. that's fake news. All there is, all there is for the U.S. is success, lower oil prices and victory.

Starting point is 02:00:43 Now, of course, what the issue is that it's payment by the U.S. Well, again, that's yet to be seen, quite frankly. But the claim is that it's from a coalition of Middle East partners. So what's funny, though, is even Quitter, who doesn't seem to get the nuance, says, 0.6, $300 billion in reconstruction.

Starting point is 02:01:04 So he's just making a fool of himself. right now. You know, the point is that clearly this is something that is happening. And all you had to say was, no, it's not going to be given by the U.S. it's going to be given to them by other people. But he doesn't want to say that because he's hoping you read this as there's no money changing hands. That's what they're doing. That's what Vance and the rest of it were doing.

Starting point is 02:01:22 No, it's investments. Anybody can invest. They know what they're doing is not what you want. They know that. That's why they're trying to lie, even within it. Here, even Chuck Schumer calling him out for signing this himself, literally right next to the part where it says that. Kind of hard to hide from that.

Starting point is 02:01:36 This is you account. June 18, the Trump administration will be providing Iran with access to $6 billion of frozen funds to buy humanitarian, non-sanctioned issued goods from the United States, which makes sense because Trump wants to go. We'll give you money, but you've got to spend it in the U.S. It's not going to change the reality for people, but this is what we already talked about. And this is you just says paying Iran to reopen a straight that was already open before the war, art of the deal.

Starting point is 02:02:06 Exactly. Well, here's the article. And I just want to reiterate, this is something that is still, I'm not going to say we can prove that this happened. This is reporting coming from different sides. And who knows, everything more than ever should be questioned right now.

Starting point is 02:02:19 But with what we know and the evidence we have, this is what I think happened. Iran to get access to $6 billion of the frozen funds, to buy U.S. goods. Now, this was published on the 18th. The Trump administration will allow Iran to access six billion of the oil. money held in Qatar to buy U.S. goods, according to Washington.

Starting point is 02:02:39 The Iranian state affiliated media has reported that Tehran expects $12 billion to be released in the 60 days. This is what we've been telling you. So $12 billion in the air waiting on whether, you know, they think they've upheld their part of the bargain. $6 billion, I've seen $3 to $6, depending on the reporting, has already been sent. And another, the rest of the $12 billion on the 20, I guess it would be the, you know, the remainder of the $24 billion total will end up going after that. That's the argument anyway. The $6 billion was previously held in South Korea,

Starting point is 02:03:10 but was transferred to an account in Qatar after the Biden administration agreed to a prisoner swap. So where we're at is it does appear if the money's already been sent. So they're just, that means everything they're saying is a lie. And here's Glenn Beck. And I really don't understand why anybody listens to these people anymore. Because this is not even some nuance. This is embarrassing.

Starting point is 02:03:34 He comes out today and says, we're technically late yesterday, I get why if so many people are frustrated or skeptical about this memorandum of understanding, on paper, as opposed to what? It looks like a massive compromise. So in reality, it wouldn't be $300 billion in unfrozen assets. That's actually not the truth. It's $300 billion in a fund that you throw unfrozen assets with the 24. This is supposed to be the big journalist.

Starting point is 02:03:59 A fixed schedule to lift sanctions. And reality being, those are already technically supposed to be. be fixed, lifted the majority of them from the beginning, and immediate oil export waivers for Tehran. Okay, so all the things he swore wouldn't happen, right? But he goes, what are we expecting when at one side, Trump is facing an apocalyptic regime, apparently that's Iran, not the one over here screaming about an apoc, a prophetic end times prophecy that the U.S. administration is packed full of people to support that.

Starting point is 02:04:28 Not Israel, but the Iranian group that they want to pretend, I mean, even Hegsses, said they have some end times prophesizing. That's not true. Iran is not aiming at some prophetic end times narrative. That's Israel, guys. And so Hegg Seth had to point at Iran when he said that because he knows how much we would be worried about that. So you want to call it the apocalyptic regime. Glenn Beck knows what he's doing.

Starting point is 02:04:52 This is a guy who's trying to avoid the conversation of what Israel is doing to this country. You can ask you, who knows why? You're going to tell me you're going to ignore that. I mean, anyway, guys, I just think this guy is such a. conscious manipulator. But anyway, one side, it's an apocalyptic regime that wants the world to burn, show me how Iran wants the world to burn. Israel's literally doing that.

Starting point is 02:05:16 The U.S. government's literally doing that. If he believes it, he's just massively uninformed. And, you know, this is like the State Department experts who know nothing about Iran, but know exactly what the State Department knows they think about Iran. They're experts on all propaganda, but they don't know anything about the actual Iran. and some of them actually grow up into that thinking they know about Iran. That, you know, here's your manufacturing consent example.

Starting point is 02:05:39 But he goes, and on the other side, an American public that has no stomach for war, I told you, I told you. Trump was blaming you. It's your fault that we didn't get to finish this war because Americans couldn't stomach it. I told you. Because that's how I read that. People disagree. I'm telling you, if Glenn Beck is pushing the same argument, they are arguing that because

Starting point is 02:05:59 Americans couldn't stomach what real men had to do. that's what they're pushing. And so what your argument is, is even though we swore we wouldn't do it, even though we promised Iran's war that would not happen, it was really because we always secretly wanted it, but we knew you couldn't handle it. And then we went to it, and then we had to stop early because you guys just wouldn't stomach

Starting point is 02:06:16 what we need to do, which is what? More than bombing civilian, you know, carpet bombing civilian areas and bombing schools and hospitals, what's the next step? Nuclear war? Is that what you're arguing we don't have the stomach for? He played the cards that were actually on the table. No, the actual play would be of not to gone into a war that you were destined to lose because Israel tricked you to doing it.

Starting point is 02:06:37 Just think about this argument, that your only two options were go to war with an apocalyptic regime. Or, I mean, how would you even frame that? You have an apocalyptic regime on one side, which is actually Israel, and then a public of America that doesn't want this to happen. Well, explain to me again, Glenn Beck, how this is supposed to be the living embodiment of our collective will. So wouldn't he have, I don't know, not gone to war because that's what we wanted? but now he's shifting to blame to you. It's your guy's fault. You're just, you can't handle it.

Starting point is 02:07:06 He goes, I'm sick and tired of the politicians and podcasters who bitch and complain no matter what Trump does. You got to love those kind of arguments. Not that we have actual critiques about what's happening in the moment, but you just complain about everything he always does. Well, guess what? I complain about anything governments do that I find to be a violation of our rights. God forbid, whether Biden or Trump.

Starting point is 02:07:27 to see people like you funny how you make these arguments are blindly supporting of trump almost all the time and only attack the other side but keep telling us how we only go after trump they scream at the war has to stop yeah the illegal war that was started against the wishes of americans yeah exactly but the second he stops it ah i see what he's doing they turn around and yell what kind of deal is this see what he's doing right there is highlighting the israel firsters not the majority of this country the majority of this country wanted to no war. Then they said stop the illegal war. Then they said that's a crazy deal that actually gives error on everything you said you wouldn't accomplish. But we're glad the war is done. That's the majority of America. This guy is a deliberate deceiver, in my opinion. I'm always going to make that clear. If the goal is to actually end Iran's regime, whose goal is that? That's the goal of the state. That's the goal of the empire. Not Americans, guys. So he's basically shifted the idea that now our argument, wait, the same government of the

Starting point is 02:08:27 same people that we're saying we don't want to war with Iran, the same government that said we promise we won't go to war with Iran, that's Kamala. And now the goal is to end the regime? How'd that happen? History shows there's only one model that works. Total World War II style defeat.

Starting point is 02:08:43 Oh, so nuclear bombs, I guess. Hundreds of thousands of death. Right. That's what we require? For what? To accomplish what? Iraq, Afghanistan, Syria? This guy can't be this stupid. This is a dangerous man. That requires American boots in the ground and an Iranian people ready to build a free country.

Starting point is 02:09:02 God, you're disgusting. From the rubble. But no, one, but no one, mine myself included, once boots on the ground. Oh, very brave of you. But as you blame us for why it shouldn't happen. The idea here clearly is that somehow this is going to benefit people. Show me one, one successful example of a regime change. One, anywhere in the world from the U.S. perspective.

Starting point is 02:09:24 Show me one place that is better today because of U.S. intervention. You won't be able to. This is a memorandum of understanding that Trump wanted. I doubt it. So he failed then. I agree. But he did exactly what a leader of a republic should do. My God.

Starting point is 02:09:41 You mean start an illegal war with no justification and then lie his way through it and then give them what they wanted? These people are showing you how embarrassing they are, guys. You need to see this. He listened to the people and found a way to end this. Are you kidding me? So now you're giving him credit for ending something we never wanted in the first place that he dragged on for way longer than he said it would be

Starting point is 02:10:02 and gave them everything he said they wouldn't. And you're going, he did this because for you, God, I can't even stomach this guy. A dictator would have kept on going. Okay. You know, despite the fact that he wasn't capable of it, didn't have the munitions to do it, was, I mean, come on, this is pathetic. At the end of the day, the president can only go as far as the people will carry him. That's just sad.

Starting point is 02:10:26 Right now, our appetite for war stops at the gas pump. Like we didn't know that before we got into this. So all of these really doing is going, yeah, it ended where we knew it would. We didn't want it. It hurts us. That's why he said he wouldn't do it. But it's your fault. We couldn't do it right.

Starting point is 02:10:41 That's your argument, Glenn? Good luck maintaining that audience. Well, Ryan Grimm comes out and shows you what somebody might say about the honest reality of this. Glenn's saying that he won everything. Jesse Waters, we want it all. even though you had to fail because of you. Tom Nichols here says, this war will be taught at war colleges,

Starting point is 02:11:01 assuming they still exist, and strategic studies programs for years to come as the case study in how operational successes do not lead to strategic victory. Ryan Grimm says in order to believe the war was an operational success in any way, but strategic failure,

Starting point is 02:11:18 you have to take seriously Trump's claims that he sunk the Iranian Navy or whatever, he did not. Let's be serious. Operationally in reality, Iran destroyed our bases, the U.S. bases, and drove away U.S. aircraft carrier groups. They scared U.S. troops into hotels. They closed the straight by force. And really, if they did, that is true, in some points, but in the beginning it wasn't fully closed. That's important to understand. We never succeeded in stopping them from firing missiles.

Starting point is 02:11:47 Our planes and helicopters and MQ9 drones were downed. What was the full number in that? So much money. it's insane. And F5 got through our air defenses and lit up our Kuwaiti base. Our allies responded by accidentally shooting down three of U.S. planes. In the past, it would take a Soviet level of direct censorship to get the press to describe that as an operational success. We weren't even talking about the failed rescue operation that seemed to be a propaganda

Starting point is 02:12:13 campaign to go after the enrichment that they got annihilated as far as we can tell that Wyatt Reed was on the ground demonstrating all the evidence. We don't we still don't even have the name of the name. the alleged pilot they claimed they're rescuing. I argue it wasn't even real. Greg Abbott from Texas got caught sharing an AI version of a person they said they rescued. He deleted the tweet. Guys, there's just no world in which an honest person can see any of this as a success.

Starting point is 02:12:40 Now, this is, as of right, technically the 18th, but into today kind of the current status of where it is. Iran warns, before it happened, of canceling all upcoming negotiations. Right. So this is what we were saying. This goes back to the middle of the day on the 18th. They're going, look, guys, we're going to cancel these negotiations if you don't follow through. And they gave him until the next day, apparently. You have the blockade.

Starting point is 02:13:03 You're the bombing of Lebanon. And it says, reimposing the full hormones blockade and responding with missiles over the direct violation of the U.S. Iran understanding first clause. That's Lebanon and Israel continuing the aggression against Lebanon, including last night, despite an explicit commitment from the first clause to end the war and guaranteeing their sovereignty. Iran explicitly rejects any theater from Trump about Netanyahu being rogue. And now Friday's Geneva meeting, that's important to hear, guys. The Geneva meeting that was supposed to happen today to launch the first round of the 30-day technical talks between bands and Ghalibov is on hold over the violation on hold, as no trip has been confirmed. So here, and oh, that's what I simply said yesterday, that this appears to be true. so but everyone saw this coming lebanon blockade we knew that was the reality but now it's on trump

Starting point is 02:13:58 to hold israel to the deal right and i don't think he's capable of doing so we'll likely know more by today so here we are oh wait actually uh make sure that was not a new one okay yeah sorry i'm glad i wanted to read this so that the other one was 12 p.m on the 18th this is 331 Iran has suspended its entire 60 day negotiation period with the u.s over the direct violation of the of specifically Lebanon, with Israeli attacks on southern Lebanon, constituting a breach less than 24 hours after the signing. Iran's negotiating delegation had already been preparing to depart for Switzerland to launch the first round of talks, but they bombed anyway.

Starting point is 02:14:38 Iran will also not unilaterally fulfill its commitments. And until Iran is fully assured, Israeli attacks on Lebanon have stopped, the U.S. and the U.S. has partially adhered to the first clause. Talks remained canceled. Does that sound like somebody in a weak position? That sounds like somebody who holds all the cards and is saying, we are literally stopping until you stop that. It's what they've been saying the entire time.

Starting point is 02:15:01 I don't know how many times we can report that, guys. It's been the same since the beginning. Now, Iranian nuclear team delays departure for the talks, citing Israeli strikes on Lebanon. You already knew that. U.S. Vice President cancels his trip. Same reason. Of course, this is what you get, right?

Starting point is 02:15:18 You get the argument. Vice President cancels because we're not ready. no, what actually happened was Iran canceled and then because these are weak child men, they act like we are the ones that wanted to stop it. And that's them that we were stopping. It's like, no, you guys, they stopped it and you have to be the one to pretend like you're in control.

Starting point is 02:15:36 Every time, guys. And again, you can see the time frame. It's quite obvious. This was from yesterday. It's embarrassing how they keep doing this. But this is what you get. Realize, guys, this is posted on, well, technically it was earlier,

Starting point is 02:15:49 but seeing this had been going on over the last couple of days. the White House comes out with this post and says America is respected all capitals again on the world stage. Peace through strength. These posts are cringy and forced. I mean, it actually makes me feel uncomfortable. Like, you know, I said this before. You know, when you watch a movie when there's like a comedy, it's a comfortable part of it,

Starting point is 02:16:15 you know, where they're embarrassing themselves on stage or whatever? I always, I don't know why. I gives me like a physical feeling. I hate those parts of the movie. It's embarrassing, right? It makes you feel, and that's what I get from this. Nobody thinks this right now. Even if you think this is, right now, this is one of the lowest points for American government perception.

Starting point is 02:16:33 Everyone sees that. And for them to just come out and yell the opposite, it's like, God, it's just tone deaf, embarrassing. It is cringy. And the G7 thing was embarrassing. From the, I'm the boss statement and anything else, it's just not what people think. And then over here, we're more respected in the world than ever. Well, here is Heg Seth, sitting down and saying, as President Trump pointed out or put it, he gave our allies a test to support America when we asked for their help and too many failed it. So as Tom writes, I guess the pivot now is to blame our allies for the war we started and lost.

Starting point is 02:17:09 Does it look like respect of your never more respected as you're sitting there calling, you all failed us? It's like, no, you're more isolated than ever. Just that's obvious, I think. Now, Ryan Rousebiani points out, Iran repairs. a six-point response plan for the violations of the memorandum of understanding. The Malek Sharati, an MP for Iran, says that the president has repaired the six-point plan, outlying Iranian countermeasures, and it has been sent to the Supreme Leader for approval. Now, up in the air, Iran knows not to trust this administration.

Starting point is 02:17:42 But as he argued, I guess earlier today, that Trump would not honor this, and it seems like that's where we are, but that's where it is. And we'll find out soon enough, I argue, when. this, if this, how this goes forward. But I think, guys, it's the same point as always. We've seen this from the beginning. Israel is clearly dictating at least in the moment, whether this stops. Trump is either not in control or not able to stop them.

Starting point is 02:18:06 And everything we've been telling you from the beginning of this is clearly where we are. And not by, not by any means unique to this platform, plenty of independent media, honest, nonpartisan, independent media have been pointing to this from the beginning. It's just, we live in such an interesting, weird kind of, uh, there's so much noise right now with just screaming narratives competing from fake news manipulators on mainstream alternative, on mainstream media. I mean, it's all over the place. And it seems difficult to get information through right now, at least to people that don't know where you are, right?

Starting point is 02:18:35 But nonetheless, a lot of us have been out there saying this has been clear from the very beginning. Now, Trump is now invoking, guess what, the Defense Production Act. Why? Because of the depleted stocks after the Iran war that we won, apparently, but did not. So what it means is we're now initiating. like we did during COVID-19, the basically production martial law. And we're going to force people to produce what we want as if we were in the middle of a time. Like, the only times I've seen that happen in like a war discussion have been in the midst of a war, right?

Starting point is 02:19:05 Making companies produce bombs because we're going to fail the war. Well, you just allegedly ended this. So this either means that he has every plan to go back to war the moment he's not completely depleted, which shows he's lying about that, or this is just demonstrating an abuse of power to reposition themselves powerfully. even whether it's Iran or not. None of this should be acceptable to people that talk about freedom and constitutional rights and all the stuff that this team pretends to support.

Starting point is 02:19:33 Lastly, just make sure we understand, you know, the Israeli government that's maintaining all this at the expense of American lives. This is the Israel we're dealing with, guys. The whole world is becoming more clear about this, but hopefully people who don't know this yet see this for the first time. June 14th,

Starting point is 02:19:50 Monda Weiss, the passage of another death penalty law shows the one issue Israelis can unite behind. Death for Palestinians. After passing two death penalty laws in six weeks, Israel is investing hundreds of millions of dollars to try to execute Palestinians on live TV. Unanimous support for the laws show that Israeli society can unite around death to Palestinians. This is the guy who just said publicly that everyone in Lebanon should burn, that we need to make the women cry who said bomb their suburbs. That's how you make them suffer. This is the guy we're talking about. This is the same argument. It's Netanyahu. It's Ben-Gabir. It's varying degrees. It is their government. And sadly, their population, the majority by epimetric, does support

Starting point is 02:20:38 stuff like this. That, in my opinion, as always, that should not be representative of all Israelis or all Jews or all anything. It is just what their society has done to people in this country. And the truth is, you can easily see Orthodox Jewish communities in Israel elsewhere. that stand up and protest this aggressively and get beat up by the Zionist IDF. But this is what the government of Israel is, guys. It's what Zionism is. It's what they're doing to the world. Bethelan, the leading Israeli human rights group.

Starting point is 02:21:05 After the so-called ceasefire was declared on 10th of October 2025, Israel continued to attack and bomb civilians throughout Gaza. Too bad nobody seems to care about this right now. Since then, it's killed a thousand plus residents of the Gaza Strip. since October 2023. Israel's killed more than 73,000 people, and it's far more than that. That's what they can prove.

Starting point is 02:21:27 Forcibly displaced about 1.9 million from their homes as part of the genocide in the Gaza Strip. This is the Israeli human rights group. Just carry on targeting civilians and bragging about it and laughing about it, having conferences about it. But apparently our government doesn't care. Assul Rod points out, death toll from Israeli fire in Gaza since ceasefire.

Starting point is 02:21:50 passes a thousand. How insane. As she says, would you call it a ceasefire if over a thousand Israelis have been killed, Reuters? Clearly not. Miranda points this out. This is from the 18th. Three Palestinians were killed and several others injured when Israel just airstrikes a vehicle in the tent city they've created.

Starting point is 02:22:12 Genocidal regime continues doing what does best. Now, why does this happen? Because they're being confounded elsewhere. So they turn around and they punish people in Gaza. That's what they're doing. They get annihilated by Lebanon, by Hezbollah, they turn around and they punish people in Gaza. White phosphorus. That's what you get.

Starting point is 02:22:28 You think I'm kidding? You can literally see them brag about it. Just a quick example of the kind of people that are still existing in this tent city that they're bombing with white phosphorus. This child who can't even get a proper aesthetic or something on his leg looks like some kind of metal tubing strapped on his leg because Israel shot his leg off. and I was just dealing with it because nobody's helping them because there's no hospitals. There are no, there's no, there's even children that are supposed to be allowed to leave to get treatment, half the time they're dying before that can happen. As Sal Deagoras points out, new report, 56% of civilians killed by explosives in all of 2025

Starting point is 02:23:12 throughout the world were killed by Israel. 56% of every civilian that was killed by explosives in all of 2020. 2025, 56% was carried out by Israel. I'm sure we'll talk about that again. This is the world we're living in. This is the world that your U.S. government, your U.K. government, the Western governments that are still blindly supporting this group, this is what they're creating.

Starting point is 02:23:37 And we're fighting, we're aiming at Iran? We're aiming at Iranians? I mean, the point is, guys, it's not about one place or one country. It's about an idea. It is about the very extremism, no matter where it resides, no matter what religion it takes cover in. It is this kind of extremism that the world needs to stand against. The fact that we can't call this out shows you where we are.

Starting point is 02:24:00 Hopefully we can make a difference with that. Guys, it's what we do this for. Stand up. Call it out. Thank you for tuning in. Helping your reach. Make a difference. I love you all.

Starting point is 02:24:12 As always, question everything. Come to your own conclusions. Stay vigilant.

The Last American Vagabond - New Moderna mRNA Flu Shot & Trump's Iran Deal Breaks Down Due To Lebanon and US Blockade Violations

There aren't comments yet for this episode. Click on any sentence in the transcript to leave a comment.