The Last American Vagabond - New NDAA (Further) Integrates US and Israeli Militaries & The Ongoing Axios/Iran War Deception

Starting point is 00:00:00 I'm proud to be the first president in decades who started no new wars. That's very good. No new wars. Instead, I brought our troops back home. No new wars. As Donald Trump campaigned for his second term, a promise. No new war. They said his personality will create wars.

Starting point is 00:00:25 They said, no, my personality is going to keep us out of wars. Look at him, listen to him. He's going to start a war. Listen to his rhetoric. They thought I was going to start a war. Let me tell you something. I'm going to stop World War III. And at his inauguration, he vowed to keep his promise.

Starting point is 00:00:44 We will measure our success not only by the battles we win, but also by the wars that we end, and perhaps most importantly, the wars we never get into. My proudest legacy will be that of a peacemaker and unifier. That's what I want to. to be a peacemaker and a unifier. Inside the White House, he formed a team of loyalists. They'd helped chart a different direction

Starting point is 00:01:15 than the one he'd promised. It starts with a simple question and ends an objective reality. Reality. Through our journey from there to here, we find one another and ourselves. And as the next 24 hours, breaks free from our last.

Starting point is 00:01:41 We gaze onward in reflection of the day. Welcome to the daily wrap up. Wednesday, June 3rd, 2026. Thank you for joining me today. Man, is it good to be back? Thank you all for all of your patience and your wonderful kind words of support over the last week plus.

Starting point is 00:02:11 I'm going to give a brief insight into what I was dealing with for those that have been, you know, very concerned about what's going on. But I really want to get back to focusing on what's going on today. You know, I, you know me, I do not like to make myself the focus of the coverage, but it's important that, you know, just that you guys know what's going on and also because it is relevant to a lot of other things that we've all been concerned about that we've all been living through. So for those that don't know, my father was in the hospital. The last show that you might have seen, if you were wondering where I was, even somebody who pointed out that they were

Starting point is 00:02:44 confused about what I was saying. I apologize for that. Bottom line was, you know, and he may be tuning in right now. My father here and there tunes into the show, and he was in the hospital when I was doing that last show. And what I was grappling with saying in that was that ultimately he took a COVID-19 shot in 2021. And I believe that's relevant. I don't, I'm not sure today where his opinion lies with all that, but I know he's been more and more open to it. He didn't take any after that. Bottom line was, that's relevant to me. I'm not going to jump to conclusions. But the reason I didn't want to get into it in there because I felt like I knew he was tuning in. I had asked him to, and then I realized it was complicated to make that case. I didn't want to make him feel bad about his choices.

Starting point is 00:03:21 I didn't want, it was in a point where his mental state was very important. It still is. Now, I flew out because it was in a midst of a very important point, but already going on for a week. Long story short of it, I just want to point on a few things. The hospital was wrong about every single choice they made the entire time. I'm sure that even happens with experts, but they were wrong about every single choice they made the entire time, wrong about what they assumed it was, treated it, wrong of what they assumed it was treated it. One of the things we were most concerned about and what the indicators were clearly demonstrating, even the doctors pointed out, was a potential autoimmune issue. And of course, we know where that connects to a larger point,

Starting point is 00:03:54 but we didn't get into any of that with the doctors. Just simply wanted to check that box off. To this very point, not a single thing has been done about that, not anything in the interest of removing inflammation, not anything to, you know, potentially see if that might have been the problem. And maybe they don't think it is. Our point is now with everything that's happened, it seems pretty clearly that's where this is leaning towards. Now, ultimately, what happened was they had to do a bypass around his duodenum from his, you know, bypasses, you know, his intestine. So bypassing the duodenum, it's, you know, making all the details because this was something

Starting point is 00:04:24 that was being blocked, the intestines right there. Originally, I thought it was something that was swelling into his intestines. They assumed it was pancreatic cancer and went forward with that, found out it wasn't, found out he didn't have cancer at all. Now, ultimately, we're ended up, despite all of our concerns and wishes to try something, to see if this might be the problem, they just decided to kind of force in the idea of a bypass surgery without even knowing what the problem was. I don't understand how that logically makes sense in any circumstance. Unless that was the only thing you thought you could do and no one had any

Starting point is 00:04:53 idea and he was about to drift away or he was going. He was stable at that point. They had put it and it intubated him. They were pumping out bile from his stomach and he, and because it was building up because of the blockage. And so that's where he was. Before the tube had gone in, they tried to pull it out and he almost died right in front of me. And it was a very scary situation. and, you know, I had brought stuff with me in hopes to work while I was there. I couldn't shave off 45 minutes to even consider these things. And it was so difficult for me. Do you guys know how hard it is for me?

Starting point is 00:05:19 Like, that's the longest I've ever been outside of this since I started doing this. And it's been hard for me to not, you know, just anyway. The bottom line was that he got the surgery. He is out of surgery. And he's in recovery, but there's been a few little blips since then. Liver spike's numbers and things that have gone up and down. We're kind of in the midst of it right now. Today we're seeing whether or not he,

Starting point is 00:05:39 and he took the tube out and seeing whether or not he goes back to normal. It'll be a big telling moment. But again, the point is they still don't even know how it all happened. They don't know what was blocking it. They don't know why it was being blocked. They just circumvented that point. That's directly what they were saying. Now, so many things I could get into that I'm sure a lot of the, our audience is interested in.

Starting point is 00:05:57 As I said on Steve's show. And by the way, Steve was somebody who came out of his way, drove hours to see me for like 30 minutes. Wonderful person, Steve. But the point was that so many things we can get into. because of what I told Steve on the show, which was ultimately like, none of this, what this all is and how horrible the system is, it's not news to you guys. Most of you lived through this. I luckily enough did not have anybody in the hospital during that time,

Starting point is 00:06:23 but you know, I covered all of this. I broke this down, you know, like day to day. And so I'm very concerned about the real things we know are happening in the system, even more so today in some cases than in the midst of COVID-19. So the point was that I decided today I'm not going to get into all of it because it'll probably take me an hour. But if somebody wants to reach out and have me on the show, and I'm sure these things will come up

Starting point is 00:06:43 as I talk about more medical things, maybe even today, the point was that there was an endless string of things that we, my brother, myself, my stepmom, who was there, caught incredible mistakes, hubris-driven decisions that were based on nothing but their opinion when you ultimately find out it's something that was a switch they forgot to turn on or insane levels of things

Starting point is 00:07:03 that could have been lethal if we weren't there. Now, all that aside, I there is a world in which these things come together where there can be people who are experts in this Western medical field who are not overwhelmed with their own hubris who can also consider what you may have to say consider what you may have looked up and bring this together in a reality of our medical system where it's not some medical tyranny dictating what you can do based on their liability but rather that you sign that saying it's our decision that's simple enough and say you give us your expertise and we'll tell you what we decide and then you can chime in and say but as my opinion is that's the wrong path. It's still our body, our decisions to choose about how we go forward. Now, the problem with all of it was my father, my late grandfather was a doctor. So he has a lot of reverence for the position and ultimately sided with whatever they decided to go toward, which the entire time was leaning towards cancer.

Starting point is 00:07:57 They were treating him as if he had cancer most of the time. And it turned out that was never the case. And it's just, he just kind of went forward with the decision to do the surgery. So at this point, we're very much hoping that he recovers. that it gets better so we can get him out of this facility. And then we can address, try to address what actually went wrong and hopes that it doesn't get worse in this period. But, you know, there's so many people out there who went through this during COVID. And I can't even imagine what this would have been like if we were in the midst of that. You know, with the not

Starting point is 00:08:24 allowed to be seen, just it's overwhelming. And it was probably one of the hardest things I've ever had to go through in this context. And so I can't even begin to understand what you guys went through if you were dealing with that during that time. And again, that's not news to you. You know. I'm just explaining that I saw a little bit more of a personal side of it than what we were covering throughout the entire situation. Now, this is going to be something that I'll probably touch on here and there, let you guys know what's happening. But I want to get back to what's going on in the world today and get back to catching up and what's happening. Now, we've been out of it for a week plus. I mean, for the most part, like even before that, I was still grappling with some of this stuff.

Starting point is 00:08:59 But doing the show, it's been pretty much about that time frame. So we're going to try to get back into this. And today, what we're going to largely focus on, I have a few things that I want to get on, get on the record rather, that are, you know, just up like, you know, this happened. And we talked about it before, kind of quick rapid fire points. And then largely focus on a few main things, which are obviously the ongoing illegal Iran war and the interesting National Defense Authorization Act 224 section that discusses something that's actually not new, but is wildly alarming and is being picked up, thank God, by a lot of people

Starting point is 00:09:31 that have never considered this situation before. And it's important to see, guys, because it shows you exactly what we've been trying to ring that bell for a long time now. We've been trying to call attention to this. A lot of people have. In fact, I'm going to reiterate today that I think it's very obviously what most people are recognizing. I mean, somebody in my family who I've referenced many times over the years, who was a hardcore Trump supporter,

Starting point is 00:09:53 somebody who was a, I mean, like blindly supporting this person. He may not be happy that I said that. But it was ultimately the thing that I saw was a support for somebody, regardless of things that were happening. You know, there must be an answer. He must have had something that guided that choice, that kind of a blind faith in somebody. He just told me today for the first time that he is,

Starting point is 00:10:12 I don't want to look it up. It was something like, you know, he's lost all of us. Everyone I know who sports Trump has lost, he's gone. Now, that doesn't mean they're no longer conservatives. It doesn't mean they're no longer MAGA, you see. They believe, he believes in making America great again. Whatever you think that means, he truly wanted what he was promised and did not get.

Starting point is 00:10:30 And that's what I'm trying to show people. Whether you think that's 1%, 10%, 50%, 80% of whatever you call MAGA, MAGA are the people who wanted those things and didn't get them. Not the government, not the Benny Johnson's, Hell Jones of the world, who try to capitalize on that illusion, but the people who truly got played. Just like, I mean, it applies anywhere. And so there is a true grouping of people in this country

Starting point is 00:10:53 who wanted to make this country what they thought it should be. Now, whether you could disagree with what they wanted, you're on the same side with people who, are trying to fight against a government that will never give you the things that you think you that you need to make this country what you think it should be it's just constantly important and I'm going to keep pointing it out like I was pointing out the two-party illusion collapsing and I think people are seeing that like we're pointing out that people were beginning to recognize the israel infiltration of the country which everybody's now talking about or the two-party illusion itself and the

Starting point is 00:11:21 awareness of maga like we're seeing constantly these things are all breaking down in front of us or the awareness of COVID-19 or any number of things that myself and Steve and the IMA were all write about not we knew but our opinions before the hand you know and there's a lot of that today just pay attention to that because it's important to be ahead of these stories before we get there and be aware of it be able to take action for them so this is the clip that we started with just to you know obviously not the peace president and it's insane that we ever he wasn't the peace president in the first administration right day one on the second administration he already wasn't the peace president guys it's so infuriating that we even have to shout these things down bob but the point

Starting point is 00:11:58 is maybe not, we don't have to. Maybe all we're doing is shouting down these points to people who don't care whether they're right or wrong anyway. And the majority actually already sees it. That's not what everybody thinks. I get that. Consider it. As I'll point out pretty much every show, I do think it's important.

Starting point is 00:12:13 Now, one thing I want to, a couple things I want to rattle off before we get into all this just so you see it. For example, Derek is going to be coming out with another article around the Amanda Ungaro story, which is interesting. Got very little attention, which I'm kind of, apparently a Daily Beast, just an article about it. Derek was covering this. This is May 1st. The Zambole, Melania Pact, Amanda Ungaro, Epstein Connections, and the League phone call.

Starting point is 00:12:35 We did a segment on the show about this. We interviewed Derek about it. It's a pretty big story. It's very little attention. I think we all know why. Not because there's no conservatives or people who see themselves as MAGA that actually care, but because the fake MAGA and the media and the fake teams on the political sphere don't want you talking about this because I think it affects all of them.

Starting point is 00:12:54 He says, why is former Epstein buddy and friend of Trump's worried about his ex-execs, Amanda Ungaro speaking out about Malini's connections to Epstein, more details to come. That's Paolo's M. Polly right there. Enough with the vicious lies, conspiracies. No, check out his article. Watch our show about it. This is a person trying to shout you away from things that are easily verifiable. And I think it's important. And I think we know what this leads to. Now, I'm not going to get into these stories today. These are points for you guys to go deeper on from what we've previously discussed. Here is Mike Johnson, Speaker of the House. Mike Johnson saying Democrats are attempting to block the reauthorization of the FISA

Starting point is 00:13:28 Section 702 for what he says are political reasons. Hold on. Let me take a step back here. So Johnson's angry that Democrats are trying to stop a thing that no Republicans wanted. It's just kind of crazy. Now, one thing I was going to joke about, probably more than once today, is how ridiculous it is where we are. You know, the Iran point, which we'll get to. If you had watched a show that I did about Iran a month ago, you'd be currently aware of what's happening. Not exactly with all the day-to-day details, but generally be aware that Trump was probably lying. Generally, be aware that Iran had very specific things they've been asking for since April and anything else is not going to be accepted. And we're still there, guys. You know, any number of

Starting point is 00:14:08 these things. It's just kind of this weird escalation. It's just the point is that while I was kind of pulled away from it, I'm seeing surface headlines and just going, how is this still where we are? Oh, Barack Ravid has another Axio story. What shocking. I guess, oh, he lied again. What a weird story. This is just one of these kind of weird cycles where you have people. who, again, actually don't like being spied on, you know, people who are Americans who believe to make this country great again, what Trump said he wanted to do. Stop FISA, right? And then he comes out and goes, damn, Democrats aren't, well, Johnson, but it's the same thing from all of them. The Democrats won't let us do the thing that you desperately don't want me to do. So hate Democrats

Starting point is 00:14:45 for it. It just doesn't make any sense. Well, it might get a little more obvious when we get into the section where it becomes clear that Israel is more so infiltrating this country. And who does want to spy on you, guys? People who aren't on your side. FISA Section 702 allows the government to conduct targeted surveillance of non-U.S. persons located abroad. Of course, what American news is trying to make the case for why somehow this is in your interest because they're on the team, right? But the idea is it's not just non-person. It's about the immigrants. No, it's not, guys.

Starting point is 00:15:13 It's largely about spying on you. And everyone knows that. And that's why his team and Republicans were calling this out before they took power and got control of the actual system. FISA extended. We talked about this in April 18th. You may have seen this story circulating. Megatron, breaking, Israeli citizen, Ori Solomon, who's been arrested for operating an illegal bio lab in Las Vegas and connections with the other one in California, by the way, which was contained all the different things they claim. By the way, you know, it's typical parsed media, by the way.

Starting point is 00:15:41 None of these things have been verified, by the way, because all of them have been claimed, but there's been no test that have been returned last time I checked, which I find insane, but it says has had all of the federal charges dismissed and he's free to go back to Israel. Weird. It's kind of crazy how that's not a major story. You know what was a major story? The biolab that might have been. connected to a Chinese person. And it's still maybe. Maybe it's China and Israel working together. Maybe it's a random Israeli and a random Chinese guy that have no connection to either of the governments. But I find it interesting that when it's a Chinese guy, we all want to talk about the partisan media. When it's an Israeli guy, it's like it doesn't matter. In fact, you're called racist for even considering that it matters, which is what we get. This fake American guy here, a Chinese national was caught in Las Vegas with an illicit bio lab. An Israeli citizen was the property

Starting point is 00:16:25 owner, but I don't knowledge of what happened. Okay, so he says, and I can prove that's not true. So this guy says, the Israeli guy had no idea it was even happening. Well, the facts dispute that, by the way, and you can watch our show if you want to get caught up on it. Israeli citizen charged in the Las Vegas Biolab case, as Fort DeStrick investigates sabotage. But it's just kind of insane, isn't it?

Starting point is 00:16:45 This is a guy out there lying to you daily. I can prove it to you. Every day, he comes out with their narrative about something in regard to Israel that's constantly shown to be a lie. But he goes, the podcaster class, which is kind of his thing lately, which by the way, when you're talking about the podcaster class, what that really is an indictment of are people like them, not him necessarily, but the people in their inner circle of manipulators, the people that are pretending to be podcasters but are actually assets for larger.

Starting point is 00:17:07 The point is exclusively posted about the Israeli who took no part. Not true. You want to watch my show? We talk about both. You see, he's not actually trying to inform you. He's trying to give you a narrative that so makes you think the Democrats or you only hate Israelis. Well, no, we covered it all, man, like most people did. But your effort is obvious.

Starting point is 00:17:25 today. Now, we talked about this one. Hondurasgate. I find this to be an interesting story, guys. And it's weird to me, I mean, more than all the rest combined, why this has gotten no attention. I shouldn't say it like that. It's very obvious to me why this has gotten no attention. It's weird to me that it's not being, it's not getting attention that it's getting no attention. European pal, I'm not familiar with, post this and Hondurasgate, the story that we covered back on May 13th, which was citing, it was called Hondurasgate. Let's see, we can actually get the link I should have grabbed it earlier. Here we go.

Starting point is 00:18:06 It's a really, I mean, I found this to be very well done. It's cited. I mean, this is something that is outside. I mean, you should question everything as always, right? A video can be a deep fake. Audio, audio, more than anything today, can be altered. But at the level of evidence that we can, like, if having recordings, the chain of custody, the evidence, the group involved being a high level, like, from what I can see,

Starting point is 00:18:32 this has all the things that would be needed to be reported on at any, especially mainstream level. And we know how flimsy they are with their sourcing. I find this to be pretty powerful. Now that, like I said, the reason I was starting with that point is that who knows? Maybe we'll find out that it was also government up. It doesn't mean, like my point would be to the evidence that backs this up is more than half the things that many people are talking about today. And I find that to be crazy. And if you don't remember the story, it's about, and I'll just read what he wrote,

Starting point is 00:18:58 Honduras Gate has revealed 37 audio recordings that direct, directly involved Trump and Netanyahu's plans to install a U.S. Israeli supremacist government with special economic zones, charter cities, as models of corporate political extraction. Now, think of this when we're talking about the infiltration of the Israeli government inside the United States. Honduras sued for $11 billion. We talked about all of this, by the way, under the ISDS corporate justice system. This was embedded within the zone contract. zone, and this is the ZD, the, you know, special economic zone discussion where, you know, what was it the, trying to think specifically, the Pernomus Capital Funding arm, but Mark Andreson,

Starting point is 00:19:38 Peter Thiel connected groups, and they're not the only ones, but they're the ones that everybody's aware of, and it's important because it makes a larger connection, but that doesn't mean that the only ones involved, but their involvement with this program is what, and citing back to the illegal Honduras regime changed, not the last one, but the one before that, both of which for the U.S. government was responsible for that they ultimately manipulated that process to be able to get this special economic zone. So it was based on an illegal

Starting point is 00:20:04 imperialist regime change. You know, you can't call it libertarian when how you got there was based on state violence. At the end of the day, they manipulated the courts, they manipulated everything. Now, I'm jumping through this quickly,

Starting point is 00:20:16 but the end of the day, you guys should read through all of these. Actually, I'll just do this one, which has links to the larger, prosperous, specific conversation, but the idea of the, network state agenda, which is very real, not secret. The point about this is it's an insight into specifically the recordings of the Israeli-U.S. government conversation about how they would

Starting point is 00:20:35 illegally set up this network state at the expense of, rather the, you know, not in the interest of Honduras to make it as simple as possible, if the government, not the people. And that's being clearly shown right now despite certain people who can still advocate for it with obvious connections to it. It says it is still, it is very much underway. That zone fever is, spreading around the globe, it comprises international neoliberal tech fascist colonialist mindset. It is very much underway in the U-47 special and economic zones, 12 free ports, and at least five AI growth zones immediately. Now tomorrow, we're likely, most likely, like 95% most likely going to get deep into the data center AI part of the story because I wanted

Starting point is 00:21:15 to do it all today, but it's just too much to talk about. And it is connected, guys, I'm telling you, these are overlapped. It's the digital world. It is the biotechnology, all the things are doing in these network state discussions are what the AI data centers are going to be a part of it. And so this is what he's talking about. And he says secretly backed by and now continued by the labor party in UK, United States, more than that too. But for those that are interested in specifically those two, you know, powerhouses of conversation, they're both very clearly, I would argue, infiltrated by whatever this is.

Starting point is 00:21:46 The reason, and it's not just this network state point, we're going to talk about the Israel infiltration and how it's happening in the UK too and already has. the reason next to no one has heard of this is down to secondary legislation. The free zone policy was not debated in Parliament. The public was not consulted and the press were not notified. Yeah, sure, libertarian, isn't it? And Orwell just said, we'd love to see you on TLAV. Now that I'm back, I'm probably going to reach out, but I've got like a thousand things in the list that we're probably going to try to set up.

Starting point is 00:22:14 Right now, my focus is just intently on the show for the next week. But I find that to be wild. I hope you check it out. Hondurasgate and the technocratic takeover of South America. America. It's connected to all the people we're talking about. And the guy, Hernandez, Juan Orlando Hernandez, that Trump just pardoned and is, watch, mark my words, going to be back in politics in the next election. He's probably going to be running the country next time. Watch. Either way, it's people that the U.S. government has maintained, I mean, rather I shouldn't say

Starting point is 00:22:41 maintained, but it's allowed to be put in power illegally. There was a point in which in between, you could argue that it wasn't necessarily, oh, see, now I'm getting into the, this was meant to be a passing point. The reality of what happened in Honduras, you can go back. and check, look at our work. You can look at it on Wikipedia. You can easily understand that they manipulated this process into reality. And there was a point at which there was some pushback from the government. And I argue that was just because they lost control of it. But you can decide what you think it looks like. At the end of the day, this is a real thing. And there's audio recordings to back it up. There's statements from them, the freedom cities, all the stuff

Starting point is 00:23:12 we've talked about. And it's just happening right in front of us. Hopefully, I will follow more up on this. Let me include these both for you. Make sure you check these out. And next we're going to get into, hopefully, very quickly, as a point about hemp that I talked about with Steve. This course, I wouldn't be doing you guys. I would be doing you an inservice or disservice, excuse me, if I didn't talk about cannabis and hemp, seeing as how where this platform comes from, for those don't know, it was largely what we focused on in the beginning of this a long time ago was like cannabis law reform and how it affected politics and everything else. And it's very, very important to understand how all it comes together. I'll include some articles if you want to go

Starting point is 00:23:46 deeper. But a quick little history, a little bit deeper on this segment slightly, with the passage of the 2018 Agricultural Improvement Act, Trump. Now, it's not unique to Trump or Biden or left and right, but it is important to see this for those that want to pretend he's somehow different. With the passage of the 2018 Agricultural Improvement Act or Farm Bill, Hemp defined as cannabis and cannabis-derived products, most of you already know this. We've talked about it when it happened, containing THC levels at 0.3% or less by dry weight was removed from the federal definition of marijuana, meaning that they simply said,

Starting point is 00:24:20 well, if it's got underneath this amount, it's okay, you can take it, you can use it. It's not illegal, right? With this change, which, by the way, we shouldn't need the government to say you can and cannot touch a plant or put it in your body. It's insane. With this change, hemp was also removed from Schedule 1 of controlled substances. Why? Because it's not psychoactive.

Starting point is 00:24:35 And it has a lot of very important benefits for this country that they know about and have always utilized behind the scenes and, you know, stole it from you, essentially. The result was a flood of hemp-derived CBD products. Some claiming health and medical benefits claiming, of course, because totally not verifiably peer science reviewed showing you it has lots of medical benefits. But my point was 2018 is when that already started. Now, it shouldn't be 0.3 or less or 0.4 or less. That's insane. You know why? Because THC is not arguable, it's not psychoactive underneath 2, 2.5 milligrams, meaning that you don't even notice a difference. And this is backed up in plenty of science.

Starting point is 00:25:11 Before we get there, Trump calls on Congress to fix law imposing forthcoming hemp product ban. So first, this sounded good, right? We hear this new thing he did with people go, good, he's declassifying. What he did, first of all, marijuana was pull it down to Schedule 3. It doesn't change anything other than they get to utilize it more for their taxation, for their control, for their way that they want to utilize it. It's still controlled by the government. And by the way, under 3, still claims that it has minimal medical benefits and

Starting point is 00:25:37 and still claims it's addictive. Neither of which are true. It has shockingly high medical benefits more than most plants you can point out, maybe all, not combined, but I don't know of any plans that have that many medicinal purposes. it's just not acknowledged and it is peer viewed. There's been science on it. It's like, I mean, it is one of the most studied plants on the planet.

Starting point is 00:25:56 It's easy to look up. They just lie about that. One of the things Trump said was, moving to schedule three will allow us to study it more. We don't need to study it more. We just need to admit the truth of it. And the reality on top of that, decriminalization, not legalization. That's the whole point.

Starting point is 00:26:10 That's what everyone always fought for. Legalization allows the government to pump what it wants into it and to sell it for what they want, tax it. And that's not the reality of it. Either way, it's still some, argued a positive step. The point comes down to that that was something he did that seemed positive to some. Now, in the midst of all that, this happened too. In the wake of the DOJ announcing its cannabis rescheduling agenda on April 23rd, Trump called attention to another matter that got

Starting point is 00:26:33 lot less attention in his executive order regulating hemp products. When Trump directed his administration to reclassify cannabis as a Schedule 3 substance in December, he also directed his White House staff to work with Congress to find a regulatory pathway that ensures Americans have safe access to non-intoxicating, see, full-spectrum CBD products derived from hemp. Oh, great. Everyone said, great. See, Trump cares and he thinks these things are good. He knows hemp is powerful and then did something different.

Starting point is 00:27:03 Trump administration claims new legal authority to dismantle intoxicating hemp products. So you see, it's a narrative game. It's a word game. See, we're going to make sure we're going to bump it up the 0.4%. That way you can have access to it. Well, what that does is effectively block off the vast majority of actions. Hemp products that have between 0.7 and above. It's not, and so all they're doing is creating an illusion that makes it seem like they

Starting point is 00:27:25 allowed you to have these products, but what it does is actually removes the most important part in my mind, the THC, what not psychoactive under the limit, but actually creates what's called the entourage effect. It is something that literally improves your body's immune system. I've covered this my entire life. I've gone over these things. We just talked about the reclassification deception right here on April 23rd. I'll include these for you to read.

Starting point is 00:27:47 I posted these on substack not long ago as well. well, the war on drugs or war on freedom. One nation's perception, deception, deception of cannabis. Talked about this one. This is the one on substact. The cannabis deception. How your government stole your future. Understanding that what this comes down to is that your body is literally designed to operate with these cannabinoids.

Starting point is 00:28:05 Naturally, it has receptors. You don't have bought receptors in your body for everything in the world. You do have bought receptors in your body for cannabinoids. Your women's breast milk has cannabinoids, which is what initiates the suckling process. This is not because you, you smoked in the past. It's what your body naturally does whether you ever did. It's important to understand how profound that is, guys. And what it ultimately means is your body was designed to work with this stuff. And it being removed from your body is something that has hindered the general

Starting point is 00:28:34 reality of health in this world. That may sound crazy to some people. It's not about you having to do it. It's about having the choice and the opportunity. And it's not something that is psychoactive. So what are we even debating about? Why would they want to be so aggressive to stop this from being used if it wasn't something that kids could take to get them high. Ask that question, guys, because that's how they conflate these things. In this very story talks about how even the government went banned hemp right in the beginning by conflating marijuana and hemp, what they did was try to argue that was the same thing. And then suddenly there was a need for it.

Starting point is 00:29:04 I forget the exact year. The point was they then remove the illegality of it. So they could keep making rope and hemp for the things they needed it for and then quietly put it back. It's just this is such a dishonest thing. Ultimately, it goes back to the Hearst family in their timber industry and their newspaper industry and a lot of other type of business interest that drove this just like today and not about health, not about anything other than their own self-interest. I also include this article denying cannabis and its true nature and realizing the many

Starting point is 00:29:35 different things from textiles to food to medicines to essential oils to natural supplements to livestock bedding to livestock feed construction, body care products, molded plastics, textiles, paper products, and on and on and on the things that it can do better, last longer, not hurt the planet, but you know, I'm crazy, right? Or on top of the idea that in general, what they did instead was shove you towards very dangerous chemical products that they know hurt you. The orchestrated addiction of the masses. The sweeping epidemic affecting you and your children. I wrote this on March 2016. And I've said this for years. I need to do an in-depth follow-up on this. But guys, the numbers on this was mind-blowing. And this is, and this study is still

Starting point is 00:30:15 here. You can check this out for yourself. The numbers on this are absolutely insane. What it was showing people was that kids were being given things like psychiatric drugs, not even a year old. 274,000 children, zero to one, were getting like psychiatric drugs. Things like antidepressants, ADHD, zero to one. I mean, the whole point is you get to the full numbers and it is overwhelming, guys. We're talking about six, almost seven million people in 2016 on antipsychotics, four to five year old, 30,000 of them. And this all combined. The point was that we are being drugged into this direction when they have things that are better at healing the things they're trying to do with chemicals.

Starting point is 00:30:57 Now, back to the point. Alongside President's strategy to combat fentanyl crisis and drug addiction, the White House plans to target certain hemp-derived psychoactive products that pose a growing concern. You see how quickly that went from, Trump's going to fight for your hemp products or Trump's going to be the one to ban them because danger? Well, don't forget, he appointed sessions in the first place. who was the one that was aggressive about this in his first administration. His administration released the 26 National Drug Control Strategy, a biannial report prepared by the White House that provides a strategic roadmap to dismantling illicit drug supply in the United States.

Starting point is 00:31:33 Hemp, what we're talking about, in case you were confused. The strategy intends to disrupt the illicit drug supply chain at every stage. From attacking foreign terrorists, transnational criminal organizations, you know, murdering people in boats that we don't verify, abroad to fortifying communities at home through, prevention, education, and treatment. Enforcement will focus on substances falling outside regulatory frameworks and being sold illegally.

Starting point is 00:31:57 The administration has been granted new with legal authority to address certain psychoactive hemp-derived cannibal substances. Look up cannibalial if you want to get frustrated. Thanks to hemp loophole closure passed as part of the agriculture rule development based on previous legislation that actually treated Americans like they weren't morons and children. You know that you can go ahead and choose to use hemp if you want to and it's not dangerous. It doesn't hurt you and has no side effects. But yeah, because it's 0.3, psycho-th-c, let's pretend like that's a danger.

Starting point is 00:32:24 Not even to recognize that the fact that that 0.3 THC is actually helping your body. Now, this just, again, to make this reasonably quick, this was the 2025. Changed a federal definition of hemp and implications for the federal enforcement. It goes over this happening in 2018 and the different details up until now. Here is a study on cannabis from the, National Library of Medicine. There's two points that are in here important. Cannabidial was first isolated from hemp oil in 1940.

Starting point is 00:32:57 CBD, which is one of the cannabinoids that we're discussing, lacks the cannabis-like intoxicating properties of THC. And for this reason, has been traditionally considered, not considered, it is literally by definition non-psychoactive. That's standing logic. So what they're doing is under the, I mean, I mean, you could maybe argue that these people still somehow don't understand that they're wrong, and they're still stuck in Reefor Madness.

Starting point is 00:33:26 Who knows, that seems possible today, which is insane. But the understanding that I think most of them are just fully aware of what they're doing and they got special interest, tobacco, whatever else, that just don't want this to be fully allowed, guys. On top of the fact that there's more sinister argument that I hope you're paying attention to of health in general and what this actually does, circumvents your opioids and your medications and whatever else and actually helps you get back to a healthy perspective. God forbid in this country that you're not being pumped full of chemicals and have things

Starting point is 00:33:53 loped off your body. Yeah, this is about actual homeopathy, about actually treating your body so your body helps yourself. Down here, it says occasional user report feeling high after consuming only two to three milligrams of THC. Now, this study you can look into yourself. The point is it is consistently shown that 2.5 under, generally speaking, is what's called not psychoactive.

Starting point is 00:34:14 Now, understand, guys, we're talking about 0.3%, not 2.5, milligrams, but 0.3% of milligrams. So that is insanely low. Can 2.5 milligrams, 0.3% of milligrams? So the reality is, what we're talking about is something that's not even remotely close to being psychoactive that they want to stop you from being able to use. Under the guise, then it is psychoactive. So you can argue stupidity. I just find that hard to believe today.

Starting point is 00:34:40 I think there's more going on. And this is the government that's trying to help you and make America healthy again, right? On the same note, the legacy media is ignoring the biggest government scan. of my lifetime. Senator Ron Johnson says, I agree. The FDA knew that its legal, excuse me, knew that its system failed to flag safety signals from the COVID injection. Does anybody not know this? I even think people that were fighting you to take them today, know this. Rather than disclose that information, agency officials chose to hide it and lie to the public. Yes, let's keep pointing back to an administration over a year ago, instead of recognizing the current administration is also not doing something. Now, we should do both, by the way. And it says, this is a massive scandal and it's time the media starts covering. I agree. But ask yourself, a media that could be making this all about Trump is choosing not to. Why would you think that is? Aren't they supposed to be adversarial to Trump? Isn't that what we keep being told? Why is Ron Johnson not making the case about Trump and his team not arresting Biden and not going after anybody in the administrator? I think those are good questions.

Starting point is 00:35:39 It announced a big investigation into the Biden administration, knowingly covering up the risks associated with the COVID vaccines. I understand you're getting some documents. What are you learning? Well, first of all, I had thanks for talking about this. I cannot get any of the legacy media to even cover this. I had one interview with Major Garrett on CBS and their streaming service, but none of their news programs, none of the Sunday shows. I consider this the greatest government scandal of my lifetime because the FBI knew or the FDA knew on March 1st that the algorithm they're using to analyze the Vayers, the vaccine adverse event reporting system, was going to. to hide in mass safety signals. 26 days later, using a new algorithm, they were shown the safety signals.

Starting point is 00:36:26 In case we're confused, we're talking about the same Bayer system that Trump and his entire team, just like Biden, is and our team, gaslit you about, lied to you about. And still to this day, are not acknowledging the reality. Now, RFK plays this tap dance game where he acts like he cares and points to it, but then nothing happens. So to me, the outcome is what matters. I think obviously this should be applied to anybody who was in power. while they were doing this. That counts for the first Trump administration. That counts for the

Starting point is 00:36:52 Biden administration. That counts for the current Trump administration. In case you're missing the point, it applies to our entire U.S. government. That's not what's happening. Now, I'm going to say the same thing for the next administration that continues to not do anything about it. It's not left or right. I hope that's clear. And they ignored it. They continue to use the system that's going to mask them and continue to lie the American public. So what we've begun now, the interview process, we've got the documents, certainly not all the documents. I mean, the folks in government understand about Freedom of Information Act. As we see the prosecution for conspiracy and structure of federal records, Dr. David Morins,

Starting point is 00:37:30 that they know how to avoid FOIA. They know that they're smart now not to put things in writing, but we got enough things in writing that's pretty incriminating. Now we start to invest the interview process of the people that are involved in these communications. Try to get the bottom of it, but I'll just say based on the first interview, they're pretty impervious to, to get full answer. You just got to love how the entire time they're just like offsetting it with pictures of Biden and masks. You know, Trump wore them too, by the way.

Starting point is 00:37:57 Like, it's just so funny how clearly one-sided are ridiculous media is today all across the board. The fake independence too, you know, it's just painful. But I'm glad he's pointing it out, guys. I'm not going to in any way suggest that Ron Johnson is not genuinely trying to do this. I question him like all the rest of him. He is a politician. We shouldn't trust him either. The point, though, is that I'm glad he's talking about it, but it has to be applied to the entirety of the government, especially at a time when this current government is still giving COVID shots to children, guys.

Starting point is 00:38:26 I don't know why that's not a bigger story for the, I mean, I mean that because there's, in my opinion, most people out there left and right are aware of where this is and people are even, especially the people on the conservative side who are choosing not to call this out for whatever reason, like the lefts weren't during the COVID-19 time. It's the same kind of, you know, choosing to stay quiet logic or whatever you're. want to call it. Now, Tom Renz points out, the Trump administration literally just argued in the Supreme Court that they should not take a case related to employers discriminating against the firmly held religious beliefs of people that want a full vaccine exemption. They went so far as to argue that having a medical exemption is necessary, but that it was okay to put limitations on religious exemptions. This is a horrific betrayal of Maha, another one. Tom Rends has been somebody who's been calling him out. I'm glad to see.

Starting point is 00:39:18 He was very much on Trump's side. The point is it's just the opposite of what we were being told. They don't respect what they said they do. I'd like to believe that's verifiably obvious today. I'm just trying to reach the people that need to see it. It's important. Now, on the overlap of this, I want to get into a few things that are important

Starting point is 00:39:39 where it comes to Trump and Israel, and then let's talk about the important article that, by the way, I was very frustrated. Like, this is an important thing. This came out May 29. I saw this come out. Like, I think it was either the 9th, 29th or the 30th. And I thought to myself, damn it, like, there's so many things that need to be covered right now.

Starting point is 00:39:54 And I'm sure, this has clearly been, it's gone viral. People are talking about it. But it's, what is it, June 3rd? And I'm like, yeah, I wish I would have talked about this in the midst of it. Because that's, you know, it's still important. And to make sure we keep this in the conversation. But anyway, just frustrating to have these things happening or seeing the lies spun out that I can't get on there in address. But again, it's nice to be back.

Starting point is 00:40:13 So before we get to that, Shadow Vezer points this out. The man is mentioned to the Epstein files over. 900 times. Ron Louder, we talked about this. His son-in-law, Kevin Warsh, is the chairman of Federal Reserve, who was just a point. Who was also, by the way, connected to a lot. We went over Warsh. Actually, you know what? I take that back. That was one of the things that I had lined up that I think my last week plan that I had like this plan five days. That was one of the things I was going to get into. I don't think we actually got into it. Remind me in the chat. I know I had it. I did the research on it, but I ultimately didn't get to go into it, I think. Either way,

Starting point is 00:40:44 the point was, it's been very well covered. He's somebody who was connected to the Epstein, files can wash himself is a you know let's just put it this way to go into it quickly because that's what i want to trying to do in this opening part is somebody who is an insider guys they're connected to all the things the conservatives were calling out about the democrats and same idea here with ron louder in the i mean what he said he says 900 times i can't remember if that's exactly accurate but he's all over these files here he is as the world jewish congress president saying that israel must unleash their intelligence agencies to stop you from spreading lies about wrong about Israel. Even if you think that he is like even if the point is you believe that all of

Starting point is 00:41:23 it is lies about Israel, you shouldn't be okay with him saying, let's go to foreign intelligence to go around the world and stop people from saying things. I just don't know why this is not like shockingly obvious to literally everybody in the planet. Maybe it is. Maybe that's the point. Israel must create a new iron dome to not just fight this never-ending cascade of lies, but it also must go on the offensive. There should be a completely new and vitally important government operation with a new director, not just a political appointee, but someone who knows PR and news backwards and forwards.

Starting point is 00:42:04 It should be a separate building. It should have a billion dollar budget. Some of the billion dollars should come from Jews in the diaspora. The desperate Jews should partner with Israel in this PR fight because in the end, it won't be just protecting the Jewish state. It'll be protecting the Jewish people worldwide. And Israel should use this excellent intelligence services in this fight. The Mossadeans shouldn't bet are second to none, and they must know where these lives are coming

Starting point is 00:42:35 from. It just makes sense to use them in this fight, and it should be one day in, day out. when Israel is hit with lies, Israel should hit back twice as hard. Its response should be furious. It should counterattack every single hour of every single day. And no institution should be spared. And there should be a special investigative section

Starting point is 00:43:02 that investigates the old sacred cows like the UN. I mean, not even full, like, engagement from the audience with that. Because I think what's fun to me, I argue pretty much everybody there is in agreement with what he wants. I think the problem is that you're not supposed to say it that clearly. Like, I mean, think about how insane it is to think that it's okay and acceptable, to argue that you should have a foreign government, the most unpopular foreign government in the planet, it seems,

Starting point is 00:43:29 and say that they're malicious, wildly elite, like ones that just conducted the pager attacks and gloated about putting bombs and children's, are going to, yeah, well, bring them all in, come in and investigate and whether or not we're saying what they think the truth is. You know, the guys that have been caught lying more than anybody I've ever seen in my lifetime over the past couple of years. And it's just, it's over, and not even just get into the point about whether or not you have a right to say and think what you want.

Starting point is 00:43:52 It's just counter into it. It is the opposite. It is incongruent with what we tell ourselves the Republicans or the Democrats or anybody in this country actually wants. But guess what, guys, they don't seem to be the ones actually making these decisions. As five times August points out, if Biden administration telling you to shut up and trust the government, or they will silence you, bothers you between 2020 and 2024, the Trump administration telling you to shut up. and trust the government, or they will silence you, should bother you now. Seems pretty simple to me, because it's the same thing, but see the differences people have

Starting point is 00:44:23 this lens they put on and look at certain groups. Five times August is somebody with integrity and principles and recognizes that they are doing that even though he hoped they wouldn't. It's very simple. Now, what we're going to talk about in tomorrow's show briefly, talking about the surveillance and the spying and that's what that really comes down to and censoring you is this data, AI, data center surveillance overlap conversation. But just to quickly pointed out, this is an article from the Washington Post,

Starting point is 00:44:51 seven in ten Americans opposed data centers being built in their communities. We don't want this. We don't want Israel and for treading our country. We don't want more with Iran. We don't want most of what this government is doing, left or right. Time to be aware of that. And do with that what you will, but be aware of it that they don't care about you. We can change that.

Starting point is 00:45:10 The point is, you know, hopefully get away from them entirely and have a world with no government. But, you know, I digress. seven and ten Americans opposed data centers being built in their communities. This is more perfect union. Data centers are the leading cause of 76% of a 76% increase in the cost of electricity for America's largest power grid over the first three months of this year. According to Bloomberg, these things are going to absolutely decimate the world that we currently, basically look at it this way with what they're doing, 12 times the amount of

Starting point is 00:45:40 of data centers to China, 45% of the entirety of the market. at least a month ago was the U.S. data centers. And they want you to pretend they're at their odds with China. We'll get into it more tomorrow. This shadowy program they put out, funded by groups in Open AI and Ballantir, want you to believe that China's, we have to beat China,

Starting point is 00:45:58 even though they're that far ahead. This is a game to them. At the end of the day, if they build what they're trying to build, look at the choke points, look at the amount of resources. Trump promising you that they won't use your, he's lying to you guys, like everything else.

Starting point is 00:46:11 They are going to change the face, of the way we live our lives and it's happening right in front of us. I just think we need to be aware of that. We'll come back to this tomorrow. Our show recently about this. Americans do not want data centers. Now, this was a post from Donald Trump in the White House on May 26th. Peace through strength.

Starting point is 00:46:31 Simple, right? All flash, no substance. Well, I simply said, there, fixed it for you. War through weakness. Seems more accurate to me, which people seem to agree with. We also have this post from Donald Trump coming out, and I just think this is, I literally posted this saying WTF. Like, I mean, this is the kind of thing I keep grappling with.

Starting point is 00:46:50 Is this meant to be a joke? Is this meant to be sort of like making fun of what we are making fun of? Or is this, him being so tone deaf, he doesn't realize this is what people are laughing about. Or is this a group out there wanting to bring this thing down around its angles? I don't know. But think about being doing this. Right. For example, quick side step.

Starting point is 00:47:09 Think about being the Trump family. and all of the undeniable connection to the Epstein files that no matter what they want to say, everyone knows about, and then going and talking about buying an island. You guys know, it was one of the things that everyone talked about. We don't need to get into it. It's obviously weird. Steve and I talked about it. I just think that's like either tone deaf or in your face obvious.

Starting point is 00:47:31 And it seems wild to me. Whether or not they're going to do it's going to do anything like that or not, it's the point that it's really in your face or the idea that we're talking about a group who's been supporting a genocide. and clearly is at least morally ambiguous enough to be okay with what they're doing, and now they're going to go by Island where nobody can see what they're going to do. Sounds like good stuff to me. Now, back to this point, same kind of idea.

Starting point is 00:47:52 The White House comes out and says, trust in Trump. Quote, just sit back and relax. It'll all work out well in the end. It always does. President Trump. Okay, aside from that being literally never the case, I mean, I shouldn't, you know, let's just put, let's be very accurate. in most cases, the government doesn't deliver, guys.

Starting point is 00:48:13 We all know that, left or right. So this is just, this is like patronizing. It's paternalism. Just go back to sleep, you dumb, dumb. We'll take care of it. It'll work out because we'll tell you it worked out. Shut up. I mean, it's just insane.

Starting point is 00:48:26 Nobody is happy right now, guys. It's just wild. This is what you get. And I find that to be either desperate or just, I don't know, maybe even provocative. Maybe they're trying to go, you know, they're trying to antagonize it. I don't know, but I just could thought that was crazy. So getting into this point, guys, which is clearly something that people are talking about. This is where I saw it first, and I believe this is the one that went largely viral,

Starting point is 00:48:48 responsible statecraft. Congress quietly moves to integrate U.S. and Israeli militaries. Now, what's really important, right out of the gate in this conversation, this is not new. I think there are the addition of biotech, the addition of specifically some of the, like, named military thing, that I find to be alarming. The whole thing's alarming. Whether it's happened before or not, this is alarming and important. important and it needs to be discussed. But what I want to make sure is clear, and I'll show you,

Starting point is 00:49:13 this has already been happening. And most of you know this because you watch this show or you watch others that have been talking about it before it was something that was allowed to be talked about. For example, two different piece of legislation that literally tried to define the IDF as same as the U.S. military. Like, these things have been happening, guys, including an actual Israeli Defense Partnership Act, which was basically a smaller version of what we're seeing now and realize this hasn't even technically happened yet. So I just think that there's two ways to look at it. If it happens, We need to be up in arms about this and we need to make sure that we continue to fight it. And you have people like Massey and Rokana who are already calling it out, even Marjorie-Theller Green.

Starting point is 00:49:48 But one of the things that I considered was whether or not this was meant to be defeated. Because realistically, it doesn't change anything that they're doing. So this might be another effort to make you feel like this is like sort of like with the Massey point. One of the things I genuinely am asking, and I guess we'll find out as we go forward, was whether or not that was organized to make you feel like they didn't have full control. And I'm not even saying I think that they do. we have to be objective. I don't know.

Starting point is 00:50:11 Maybe they did, and they don't anymore. Maybe they never did. I mean, we need to always be objective about it. But that means considering the fringe points too, doesn't it? So my point here, and Massey was just wondering whether this is part of some kind of a coordinated thing to make you go,

Starting point is 00:50:23 oh, see, they really don't. And these guys are all crazy. Well, I don't think that's the case whether or not it's all entompassing. And this point, if this sort of just fails, the very people out there that want to act like you're crazy,

Starting point is 00:50:34 you're going to go see. It didn't happen. So there you go. though, like I'm going to show you, this is not inconsequential, but even if it doesn't happen, it doesn't change what we're currently watching. And you'll see what I mean when it comes to the coordination that already exists. But this is an important and large step. This was May 29th. At a time when the American public is expressing unprecedented levels of distrust in the Israeli government, Congress, which again, my point, that's insane to do it right then.

Starting point is 00:51:02 Congress just proposed tying the U.S. to the Israeli military more than ever before, which is why I appreciate the way they wrote this because that's important to add. Most others aren't making that case. That it's just like this is the new, the effort to do it. I argue it's been done already. Buried in the House version of the 2027 National Defense Authorization Act, released on Tuesday, is Section 224 and plenty of other things, by the way, that we might get into in the future, entitled United States Israel Defense Technology Cooperation Initiative.

Starting point is 00:51:33 The provision would arguably do more to intertwine the U.S. military with the Israeli military then the more than $200 billion inflation adjusted in military assistance, Israel has received from the U.S. since its founding in 1948. That's so much more. But overall, it's not even just about the money, right? It's about actually having on-record legislation, as I pointed out my entire career doing this,

Starting point is 00:51:57 that just gives things to Israel or makes agreements or the legislation they pass allows an opening for Israel to take advantage through companies or any number of things. And again, specifically deals that argue on. on the surface, a government partnership, right? Or AI, for example. Section 224 lays the groundwork for bilateral research and development. Co-production of weapons, joint ventures, licensing agreements, and seemingly every manner of U.S. Israeli military, industrial complex cooperation.

Starting point is 00:52:30 The U.S. and Israel already worked together heavily on missile defense, but this provision would greatly expand coordination to seemingly every area of defense tech. including AI, quantum, autonomous systems, directed energy, cyber biotech, and many more. We'll read the whole section for you. It also proposes network integration, because why not? And data fusion. In other words, the U.S. military's data could soon be the Israeli military's data. I kind of think we're already there, quite frankly.

Starting point is 00:52:58 If fully enacted this proposal, I mean, Hegseth is the head of this, guys. I think that speaks for itself. Or the other different obvious strategic partnerships that are at the high. highest level. To me, I think, or, or I mean, I'll just play it again because I think it's important that you have people who told you this more than once over the years that it was already the case, right? That is real, for example, controls the Pentagon. It's unquestionable that the Epstein business was heavily influenced. Let me put it that way, Obama-Sla. And so that's somehow emblematic on these huge geopolitical issues.

Starting point is 00:53:40 Yes, I watched Massad take over the Pentagon in 2002. The Pentagon was infiltrated by Mossad. They did not need any identification to get through the river entrance to the building. They went upstairs to Douglas Fife, the Undersecretary of Defense for Policy, the third most powerful man in the Defense Department. Occasionally, they went to the second most powerful man, Paul Wolfowitz, the Deputy Secretary of Defense. and they had run of the Pentagon.

Starting point is 00:54:11 Donald Rumsfeld, the Secretary of Defense, said to my boss one time, hell, I don't run my building. Mossade does. I still just find that insane how many things like that we have, or John Kirkow openly saying they control the U.S. government, or Douglas McGregor saying they control the military. These are people withstanding in the conversation, whether you think you could trust them or not.

Starting point is 00:54:33 Question everybody, right, always. But I just think that's wild. So, back to the point. If fully enacted, this proposal would provide a higher level of military industrial integration than the U.S. has with any other country in the world. Of course, because why wouldn't you want to coordinate publicly with the only government openly committing a genocide on the planet? To be sure, the U.S. has worked closely with the NATO partners on co-production and shared

Starting point is 00:55:00 supply chains, most notably via the Defense Production Action Plan. And as the number of one arms dealer in the world, which is important to understand, the U.S. provides weapons to militaries across the globe. And I've cited these reports many times over the years. There's groups that literally catalog who sells weapons to the worst people in the world. The U.S. government is the top of that list. These things are basically understood by most people with an education today. I shouldn't even say that, that are just, no, I take it back entirely. People who are intelligent, very different than getting an education, because you can simply look and understand that they're selling to the people that they claim they're fighting half the time,

Starting point is 00:55:35 or not even getting into the reality of al-Qaeda and ISIS and the verifiable reality of how they've worked with created fund armed these groups but my point is that you can look at you know a Saudi Arabia or the different countries in the world that are considered despotic or you know that are in just unstable and the u.s. government will happily sell them weapons. Israel for example is one of the obvious examples but what's so what's crazy is that you already have this reality as the number one arms dealer and it just and yet they call everyone terrorist but it says the u.s. provides weapons to militaries across the globe but that is mostly a one-way street with the U.S. providing weapons to foreign buyers who only occasionally make parts

Starting point is 00:56:13 for those weapons themselves, as in the case of the F-35's global supply chain. However, now you're going to have Israel creating more and more things that are taking part in our day-to-day lives, in our munitions, in our electronics. I'm sure you already recognize why that's concerning. Section 224 would be a different beast entirely. It would views the U.S. and Israeli defense sectors in multiple areas vital to the battlefields of the future, which, by the way, are now coming to your home. Like autonomous systems and cyber, it would also bring extraordinary Israeli influence to the U.S. beyond what it already has through the Israeli lobby and its robust network of

Starting point is 00:56:55 social media influencers. It would give the Israeli government the opportunity to greatly expand one of the most powerful levers of influence in U.S. politics. jobs in the United States by expanding or starting new co-production facilities like it already has, by the way, in Mississippi, Arkansas, the Israeli government could boast of providing jobs on U.S. soil, thereby securing allies among members of Congress who represent the districts where those jobs lie. So, in case you missed that, the reality of the U.S.-Sraeli government, having co-production facilities inside the United States, would you be okay if China had co-production

Starting point is 00:57:34 military facilities inside the Mississippi and Arkansas? Probably not. Shouldn't matter which one we're talking about. The result could well be a U.S. political system, even more susceptible to the whims of an Israeli government that seemingly has no qualms about drawing the U.S. into military conflicts in the Middle East.

Starting point is 00:57:49 This unprecedented level of U.S. Israeli military integration stands in stark contrast to the traditional aid model of defense cooperation in which Israel already stood out as the top recipient of U.S. military assistance. Sure, and which is the case, but just a very friendly way to write that. U.S. assistance.

Starting point is 00:58:07 As laid out in a recent Quincy Institute brief, authored by Stephen Simon, this shift, and this is super important, from an aid model to a military integration model has troubling implications. To the article from the Quincy Institute, namely the implications are that the shift will strip away

Starting point is 00:58:24 the political and diplomatic oversight mechanisms that make the relationship publicly accountable, which, by the way, already is not. What he means by making it public accountable, which it means that you can simply choose to look into it and find out they're breaking the law. The problem is the mechanisms that choose to do that don't have any teeth anymore.

Starting point is 00:58:42 Like Congress on the executive branch or the UN to the global dynamic. The point is they're already supposed to be publicly accountable. Nobody chooses to hold them accountable. Now what we're saying is we're moving away from even being able to be held accountable. Gotta love that. Moving it from a visible annual aid vote in Congress,

Starting point is 00:58:58 which they already blindly do anyway, into the opaque machinery of defense acquisition. where oversight is limited and political accountability is minimal, non-existent. The result would be a defense relationship that is simultaneously deeper and less transparent. Now, this is why they're out there screaming about why we need to shift into, you know, a relationship, not aid, and people, and what they're trying to frame it as is Netanyahu no longer wanting U.S. money. It's such an obvious scam. All they're going to do is continue to do these things behind the scenes.

Starting point is 00:59:29 And at the end of the day, it'll be far more than you could ever imagine. all comes at a time when the Israeli military has repeatedly used U.S. weapons in strikes that have violated international law in Gaza. And as Israel has repeatedly violated ceasefires, as has the U.S. itself in the Trump administration's unnecessary war with Iran. Now, clearly they have an opinion there. But guys, if you're actually pretending at this point that this wasn't an illegally started a war, that they haven't broke these ceasefires, like you're choosing to ignore basic and verifiable facts. Now, whether they have a site or not, those things are verifiable today. And it's like any other conversation we've held where you come to a point,

Starting point is 01:00:03 where it's proof, not evidence, but proof. And you can't deny these things. You can't just pretend bad guy, therefore these laws don't apply, which is what they're doing. It's not self-defense when you initiate the war. These are basic things, guys, and that's why most people that once supported them are no longer doing so, one of the many reasons. But overall, you're doing this, creating this illusory change into something where we're no longer a partner when all you're doing is making them you, essentially.

Starting point is 01:00:29 The enormous gulf between what most Americans want and what the president is doing when it comes to Israel and what Congress is proposing here should not be ignored. You know every poll should be taken with a grain of salt. Nonetheless, just 30% of respondents to a New York Times Sienna poll from mid-May believe Trump made the right decision to go to war with Iran, with 64% saying it was wrong. An Institute for Global Affairs poll released earlier this week dove even deeper into the American psyche when it comes to arming Israel, finding that, quote, just 16% say the United States should keep supplying Israel with weapons without new restrictions.

Starting point is 01:01:05 38% want to stop supplying weapons entirely. Another 24% weren't weapons conditioned on how they were used. So, I mean, and these are polls from high levels sort of like, I mean, you could argue there. Everything's got political influence. My point is, guys, like I said, with somebody close to me who was right up until like days ago was like we still got, you know, Trump's now going, nobody supports them anymore.

Starting point is 01:01:25 This is what people are starting to understand. And you ask your friends, it's, we're telling you guys, if we get out of the fake news media, fake old independent media, fake influencer, Twitter dynamic, it becomes very clear that everybody, even if on different sides, are aware that they're not supporting this right now. The vast majority. And if they are, then that means they were okay with not getting what Trump promised them. If there are people arguing that Trump has, I mean, funny how you're not hearing the promises made promises kept narrative anymore because you just can't make a straight face when you say that.

Starting point is 01:01:55 Yes, mainstream leadership in both parties remains largely pro-Israeli, right? and continues to shape the base legislative text before amendments and broader congressional debate open it to the full body, as is the case with this NDA provision. I mean, literally, guys, I was going to have it right here. Oh, he didn't cite it exactly.

Starting point is 01:02:18 I have the link right here for. Marjorie Tilly Green shared this, and so did a few others. This is directly from the U.S. government. It is a document coming from Benjamin Netanyahu. Here's what it says. I was glad to receive your proposed congressional resolution endorsing my plan to shift the framework for the U.S. Israel Defense cooperation from aid to partnership. And again, that doesn't mean they're not getting money.

Starting point is 01:02:43 It means you're not going to be able to see the money they're being given. As I said in our meeting, the bottom line is he goes, I'm heartened by our enthusiastic support for our plan to develop a new memorandum of understanding. My plan. So as we just read and as we're seeing, Israel is now dictating what our country. government is passing through legislation left and right in order to benefit Israel at your expense. Let's keep calling this America first, okay? This is obviously not. I just find that to be absolutely mind-blowing. Now here is the actual section 224. The Secretary of Defense shall designate an executive agent as such term is defined in Department of Defense Directive by 101.1.

Starting point is 01:03:21 Relating to the DOD executive agent issued February 7, 2022, responsible for synchronizing cooperative efforts between the United States and Israel to expand and accelerate bilateral defense technology research, development, testing, evaluation, integration, and industrial cooperation. Yeah, I'm sure those things are free, right? You're going to pretend like, you know, stop giving us aid. The point overall, guys, is that if they're going to now have integration with this

Starting point is 01:03:48 in defense, in all of these points, you can simply argue that they're going to be able to access, to access the money that is being allotted for the things they're jointly working on. I mean, I simply, my argument, and I'm not saying I know for a fact because maybe this doesn't even go forward. But when we get there, if this happens, my argument is it will be so much more than it was before, or really just all or nothing.

Starting point is 01:04:11 They will be able to access, almost, I mean, you'll see more as we go through this. I'm not just military, biotech, surveillance, cyber, I mean, all of these things. And that means they're going to be involved with these production points and integrated with their choices. And I think the funding is a huge part of that. And so what I'm saying is I think once this blends together, that it won't even be about how much they're getting because they're getting what the U.S. government is getting.

Starting point is 01:04:34 I could be wrong on that. But that's how I read this. And I think it's important to understand it's already been building, and this is sort of another huge step. By identifying jointly developed or Israeli origin technologies. So one of the integrated points for development, identifying jointly developed or Israeli origin technologies.

Starting point is 01:04:53 Let me ask you something. Why wouldn't it be American origin technologies? technologies or jointly or Israeli. Funny how you leave out the one that leaves out Israel. So we're not allowed to develop the joint discussion with anything made only in the United States. We're only allowed to use the things that are jointly developed or made alone in Israel. Because that totally makes sense, doesn't it? With operational utility for potential integration into United States systems and programs of record, ensuring collaborative research initiatives involving government, private sector, and academic institutions in the United States and Israel

Starting point is 01:05:24 is done in a manner that protects sensitive technology and information and the national security interests of the United States and Israel. To me, that simply means you don't get to see even remotely what they're doing with your tax dollars, facilitating the transition of technologies from research and development into procurement and acquisition pathways, establishing frameworks for joint ventures, licensing agreements, and United States-based co-production or manufacturing partnerships with Israeli industry. I mean, all this really is saying is in every possible. way, what we were once doing alone is now going to be involving Israel. That's not America first.

Starting point is 01:05:59 How is that America first? You're simply weaving in a foreign entity. Cooperate coordinating with relevant Department of Defense components, including the irregular warfare technology support directive. Sciops. Capability to development and innovation divisions. The undersecretary of Defense for Research and Engineering. These are all things that coordinating relevant departments of defense components.

Starting point is 01:06:22 This is things that are going to be interdictional. with the Israel side. Sciops. Under Secretary of Defense for Research and Engineering. The Defense Innovation Unit. The United States Israel Operations Technology Working Group. The Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency. That's DARPA, ladies and gentlemen.

Starting point is 01:06:41 The missile defense agency, the United States Space Command, the military departments and other Department of Defense entities as appropriate. So I guess that leaves it open for whatever they want to do later. To align efforts and avoid duplication. What? This is why everyone's pointing this out, which makes me a little bit wondering whether it's meant to be just put down, right? Like I said, but it's just in your face. Promoting joint training exercises and information sharing mechanisms to enhance operational readiness to deploy jointly developed technologies.

Starting point is 01:07:14 Jointly developed. The synchronized cooperative efforts under subsection A may be carried out through the following domains. counter unmanned systems, including aerial maritime and ground platforms. So just get ready for the drones enforcing your streets being driven by the IDF. Anti-tunneling and subterranean threats, missile and air defense technologies, artificial intelligence, quantum machine learning and autonomous systems, directed energy and advanced sensing, cyber defense, electronic warfare and digital resistance, biotechnology, biomanufacturing, and medical defense. Remember what they called Israel during COVID-19? Pfizer's lab. That's what they called it because they basically used Pfizer alone and forced it on the population. They were very much a player in the large thing we went through.

Starting point is 01:08:00 I find this to be alarming. Network integration, data fusion and contested logistics. Defense industrial base cooperation. Pretty simple. Manufacturing, co-production, other emerging technologies is jointly agreed. So whatever we decide to add as we go forward, I find that terrifying. I don't know about you guys. Now, Washington Post, a steadfast Israel ally is introducing a resolution to end the $3.8 billion in annual aid Israel receives from the United States. Instead, have a nation fund its own purchases. You see, if you only read that, you go, hey, that's great. That means they're trying to decouple themselves. But of course, if you understand what's really happening and you look at the bigger picture, you'll realize that all they're doing on the surface is going, hey, we're going to stop all

Starting point is 01:08:45 the funding. But quietly, we're going to allow them to access the bank. Right? I mean, that's what we're doing. You're pretending you're stopping the funding. Now they could basically work with you alongside you using your funding. Well, I guess we'll see how this goes. I'm willing to argue that if that doesn't go, this won't happen. And coming back to the point that this whole entire plan seems to have been written by Netanyahu, at the very least, that's what he wants you to hear.

Starting point is 01:09:11 But doesn't mean it's false, by the way. How often have I shown over the years how they will come out and yell the thing that makes the team in the United States look stupid? And they never do anything about it. to Trump, Biden, he comes out and goes, thanks for doing my plan. You think that's,

Starting point is 01:09:25 you think that's what Trump wanted him to say? And Marjorie Tilly Green says, the United States of America is a sovereign nation. Section 224 of the 2027 NDAA must be removed. Look, my point is well, guys, you go through that. There's tons of things that should be removed.

Starting point is 01:09:40 Tons of things that, for example, continue the illegal detention of Americans, things that continue, the Smith-Munt modernization. All the things we talked about over the years, they're not trying to stop those things, are they as they continue to justify

Starting point is 01:09:51 visa warrants. Our military should not be integrated with any capacity with the foreign country's military, nor should we be funding it. I happen to agree. Here's by the way, an ongoing thread I've always include, of Donald Trump on the campaign trail where he constantly told you he'd be doing

Starting point is 01:10:07 all of this, where he constantly told you he'd be fighting for Israel with the expense of Americans and nobody wanted to listen as he does his campaign trail with Israeli flags behind him. Gee, it's almost like we were trying to make this clear in 2024. I hope you can check it out because it's obvious if you understand where we are now, you can look back and see that he was telling you he was going to do this.

Starting point is 01:10:24 If you are honest with yourself, this is a joint statement of, and to get into some of the different points that show you these overlaps beyond the current 2027 NDAA, or rather before, but in general, joint statement of the United States and Israel on the launch of a strategic partnership on artificial intelligence,

Starting point is 01:10:41 research, critical technologies. My point is that's what they were saying in some parts over there. So this was already going on in many different ways. To me, that's more of an enshrining of it as something I think it's because of this transition from aid to partnership they're pushing. But to me, it just shows you that they already have access to all of your information. As I've continually demonstrated, I mean, it's not an opinion. This is not some gleaned hyperbolic point. It's exactly what they said is happening.

Starting point is 01:11:05 And I went through it with a fine-tooth comb. And my point here is that they have this overlap with the data. They remove the silos from and now they are accessing to train their models and their AI and Israel is a part of that, as well as research. and critical technologies. That was January right in the beginning of its administration. We also have the detachment 201, which we talked about, which was Palantir, meta, open AI, who are in the military. And this, I don't know why this still has not gotten much attention. It's insane to me. We're talking about people in the tech field who did not get inducted as civilian military, which they have, right, where you can, you're part of the military as a,

Starting point is 01:11:45 as a tech guy with a white lab code. No, they brought them in as, these people are uh what were they now forgetting the the their current um the colonel i believe it was colonel but i don't want to misquote it it was a very i think it was one of the highest rankings it's frustrating me i can't remember that right now the point was ultimately that they got put in as a mill these people are over militarily people under them in the military like actual people in in operations now we have to say they're going to go out there and start ordering people around but as brad miller pointed out they could and they do have the standing because that's what the U.S. government allowed. They've inducted people in Palantir and

Starting point is 01:12:22 and Open AI and Meta into the U.S. military as people who have actual military standing. Why is that not alarming? Why did that not ripple through the entire conversation? Because of the same points we're making. That's insane. Now, I'm bringing up today because I want you to see not just the Israel port, but how all of this is changing around us. We're watching the technocratic change. We're watching the control grid of build. We're watching Israel continue to infiltrate all of it. Funny how we were screaming about all of this in 2024 and so many other people well before that. Just my point again, we could do something about it if we care to do right now. Now, Palantir, as long with plenty of other examples, have their, they also have their

Starting point is 01:13:03 strategic partnership with Israel for battle tech. So Palantir also has access to basically all of the, I mean, list off the, what, 15 agencies that Palantir is immersed in this country and they have a strategic partnership with Israel to kill people with AI. That's not a hyperbolic statement, by the way. Lavender, Habsora, IDF members, 972 magazine have openly testified to how that's working. And yes, it is Palantir, despite all their efforts to ignore that in the beginning. I'll include this as well. This is just one of them, the mass assassination factory inside Israel's calculated bombing of Gaza.

Starting point is 01:13:40 The point isn't the data, but also the coordination and the infiltration. Right. Now, this is a piece of legislation from 2024, H.R. 8445, to amend Title 38, United States Code, and I've talked about this before, and the Service Member Civil Relief Act to provide for the eligibility of the United States citizens who serve in the IDF. Now, it says the bill provides eligibility to all, to U.S. citizens, excuse me, not all. The bill provides eligibility to U.S. citizens who are serving in the IDF. the Israeli defense, the occupation forces in Israel for benefits and protections available under the Uniform Service Employment and Re-Employment Rights Act. Now, that's not the most important part. It says specifically, the bill requires the service of such citizens who are in the IDF to be regarded in the same manner as service in the uniformed services under U.S. ERA or military service under SCRA,

Starting point is 01:14:43 including in matters of state and private employers. So what that means is you're treating IDF under these discussions as U.S. military. It's just one more example of this continued change. And it's right in front of you. This was 2024. And I find that to be alarming because we're not talking about people that are, you know, like somebody doing it because of what's going on in the world today. We're talking about people who are Israeli citizens who happen to also have American citizenship,

Starting point is 01:15:09 who are in the Israeli military, who are treated like they're in these U.S. military. Now, there's different circumstances, but that's one of them. And whether you think that's the point or not, it ultimately adds to this part of the conversation where you are creating a blurred line between Israel and the United States, especially when it comes to a military discussion. This is from 2025. Now, this is also, I think this is far more important

Starting point is 01:15:31 because this, guys, is an earlier version of the same conversation. The United States, Israel Defense, Partnership Act of 2025. Now, this is the same thing. This is from the Senate. the bill requires or authorizes certain actions to increase defense-related cooperation between the United States and Israel. So it's not left or right. It is your government that is actively doing this despite what most Americans clearly verifiably want.

Starting point is 01:15:55 Specifically, the bill requires the Department of Defense, too. It requires it to establish a cooperative program with the concurrence of the Israeli military defense to develop and deploy advanced technologies for unmanned. you know, the stuff we read earlier. Establish in Israel an office for the defense innovation unit. An organization that focuses on rapidly fielding and scaling commercial technologies across the U.S. military. Okay, so establishing in Israel, an office, a unit that's basically, its only focus is to deploy

Starting point is 01:16:33 military, to deploy technology in the U.S. military. What? I mean, again, you guys may think that doesn't matter. Oh, they're an ally. But guys, this is a group who is doing all the things in the world we're discussing, who has publicly admitted to doing things to the U.S. government, who is on the record of doing things, spying on Trump, spying on Biden, called out by plenty of former agents of what they do to them. I mean, and on top of all of it is bragging about a pager attack that in many cases killed innocent people. It's just insane to me. And what you're saying is establishing an office, by the way, they already do this, that basically, the focus is to put technology in the hands of the U.S. military, seek to engage Israel's MOD as an assertation of Israel into the national technology and industrial base. It says the bill authorizes the DOD upon request of Israel's Ministry of Defense to jointly conduct research, development, test, and evaluation of emerging technologies such as artificial intelligence and robotics to meet defense challenges. So if Israel asks, they do that, apparently. Additionally, the bill extends the authority of the DOD to carry out the research development

Starting point is 01:17:44 test and evaluation on a joint basis with Israel to establish anti-tunnel counter-unmaned aerial systems capable capabilities through 2028 and transfer defense articles intended for use as reserve stocks for Israel through January 1, 2029. Oh, wait, so you are going to be dumping them. Also, you're going to frame it as partnership, not aid, while you give them things the same way. Yes, exactly. Shocker. I know, you're shocked.

Starting point is 01:18:09 But the point is, guys, all of our government is okay with this, and they're all pushing it. And it goes back a long way. Now, here's Colin Wright. I'm not familiar. I just saw this going around. He says, this is Thomas Massey, put a poll out. What's the greatest threat to American liberty? 85% of people, only 5,600 votes said Israel.

Starting point is 01:18:27 Iran, Iran, China, Russia, those are the choices, right? He says, it's hard to convey how utterly delusional this is. I mean, think about how crazy it is to stand here with the way. all that we're looking at and argue that this, I mean, even if you agree, even if you think that's wrong, let's just say you think Iran is more of a threat. Are you going to pretend like Israel is not openly countering U.S. interest right now, that they're not doing things that are putting Americans at risk, that they're not literally driving people to be censored and suppressed and attack in this country for things they're saying about Israel? I mean, look, I argue that this guy

Starting point is 01:18:59 well, very much knows that he's hiding these things, very much knows that he's trying to gaslight you into not acknowledging him because he's on his real side. That's it. My opinion entirely. but what's crazy is that everybody sees this right now this is mark ruffalo there's plenty of them left or right by the way who are in the their normies if you will and he cites this article that we just read the room guys we don't want to be israel and we don't want israel to lead our militaries anymore our military we have done or we're done with this dynamic i just need to really take a second in stress that we're talking about people in the mainstream the people that were the they were the ones calling you racist 30 seconds ago for saying things just like that.

Starting point is 01:19:40 Now that the ones going, holy crap, Israel's controlling our military. So if we're still pretending for a second that we were, well, that it's not obvious, that what we were saying in January about people being aware of this is now suddenly still false. You're just ignoring the facts. I mean, I could go on forever. I mean, the high level people on the Republican side of this, who I still don't think are honest, who are now, I think, being forced to acknowledge it because they can't lose their

Starting point is 01:20:03 entire following. It still shows you that we were correct about it and saw it earlier than post people. But now you can see it. And everyone's aware of this and you still have the people that are out there trying to gaslight you to ignore it. Right? Like this clown. No, utterly delusional it is that the government that everyone can see committed genocide that is censoring Americans around the world is the one that we all feel as a threat. How crazy is that? Nobody believes it. You know what I mean? Like this is obvious, I think. Now, Washington Post, this is an additional story that you could see as separate, but I feel was relevant.

Starting point is 01:20:34 I feel like it's interconnected. It happened around the similar time. Pentagon Bans journalists from press office, designating it as a classified space. This is from yesterday. The simple point was the change in security status, which took effect in recent weeks, was confirmed by four people familiar with the matter.

Starting point is 01:20:49 They ultimately turned the what was an open, I think I'm just, I was just going to, yeah, skip it, generalize it. The point was, what was once a place where people, whether you think they're actual journalists or not is irrelevant. The point is that people could go in who are in the journalist field or whatever you think the mainstream is, could go in there and ask questions, right?

Starting point is 01:21:09 Could go in there and anywhere that's not classified was able to be in their reporting. Now, that wasn't, didn't go back a long way. I think it was Austin. The point was that ultimately that was created to give the illusion of accountability. That's my opinion anyway. But what I'm highlighting now is that that's being dashed

Starting point is 01:21:26 because these people are so shockingly unpopular and so incompetent. Hegsteth more than most right now. He's on the top list now that Bondi and the rest are getting pushed to the side. And so what I'm pointing out is that this is something I think about trying to hide even the small things because everyone sees what they're doing

Starting point is 01:21:46 and is calling it out. Not because I think they have an interest in being truthful, but because that, what's the expression? That ship has sailed, right? I think everyone is seeing what they're doing. People are largely aware of how clearly they're being manipulated. And now the in the media who would otherwise usually gaslight for that is now like we showed with plenty of the other opportunists are going, well, we're going to call

Starting point is 01:22:06 it out because our audience sees it and we have to. So now you get, well, you can't come in here anymore. Just done. From the group screaming about free speech, media access. Oh, it's the new media seat. Guess what? You can't come anymore. None of you. I find that to be very, very telling. Now, what I think is interesting, all of this is happening around the moment when everyone's suddenly starting to recognize the DoD is compromised. And just like that, he shuts down press in the Pentagon. Now, you can decide whether or not that's something else. I find it to be pretty, I find it to be, I find that it could be connected for obvious reason.

Starting point is 01:22:37 You can decide for yourself. Francesca Albanese says this. This was on June 1st. The Israelization, Israelization of our societies is already happening. Posturing democracies where human rights can be suspended for people that who, for though, excuse me, for people that those in power consider disturbance. Like this person who's simply protesting for to stop the Palestinian genocide. She says, wake up Brits, Italians, Germans, French, North Americans, Dutch.

Starting point is 01:23:11 Pro-Palestine prisoner, Umar Khalid, a 22-year-old with muscular dystrophy, has been dragging himself across his prison floor because he had been denied a wheelchair. He hasn't had access to a shower for over 20 weeks. He has been waiting for a neurology appointment for over 12 weeks while experiencing chest pain and breathlessness. This is happening in a British prison right now. I've written to David Lemmy to demand answers. Why? Because he supports Palestine.

Starting point is 01:23:43 Not allowed to say from the river to the sea, apparently. You're not allowed free speech. And as Elon Musk once was really calling that out, a funny help these ones don't get acknowledged. because he's a complete hypocrite and only calls out things that are in their agenda. Has no principles because this would apply if he was upset about censorship. The bottom line is it's about what they can use to sell you on certain narratives. I swear free speech.

Starting point is 01:24:04 I don't care if it's about Muslims or Jews or anything else. You have a right to say what you want. That's the important thing, guys. And anybody who's not consistently saying that is not honest. And so the point is what she's showing. I think it's important to realize that as a UN special rapporteur who has been standing up against this and has been constantly attacked by Israel for saying what we all. know is true is standing up and telling you that this is happening. Israel is manipulating societies

Starting point is 01:24:27 in the world, even at the very least from a societal standpoint in allowing genocide. But I think it's more than that. And I think she's acknowledged that it's more than that. Matt Kinnard points out the former Tory, the former Tory foreign minister admitted in his diaries that Israel controls the UK foreign office. Of course, he could be making it up. But with what we're seeing today, I think it's worth considering. It wasn't reported in a single U.S., in a single UK newspaper. The Israel lobby has captured the British political, judicial, and media systems. We are underconcerted and wide-ranging attack. Wake up. Now, of course, what's the immediate response? You hate Jewish people. Well, that's not what he's saying, guys. And if we haven't yet to come to that, you know,

Starting point is 01:25:07 I mean, I'm still bumping up against people that argue they are regular followers that somehow still argue. Now, not from a sense of, like, I just disagree with you. I welcome the disagreement. If you still argue that I'm wrong about Zionism, not being Judaism, aside from the fact that it's easily verifiable, that's okay, we can disagree. But if it's coming from a point where the argument is all Jews are bad and you still pretend like you agree with what we're doing, that's not true. I have outright called people like that disgusting. And I find it hard to believe that people would be tuning in thinking. So my point is there's a lot of people who are coming at it trying to convince others that we're somehow misguided, gatekeeping. Well, you can quite literally prove that they're not.

Starting point is 01:25:44 I mean, for crying out loud, it's not. It's called Zionism. One's called Judaism. So just at a basic word, understanding of definitions level, they're not the same thing. Then secondarily, you can realize that it was a group that was created who were atheists and, you know, non-s. The people that are claiming to be given land by God are people that on the record were either atheist or simply not religious by the document you can prove. If you don't believe me, go ask Grock right now. Doesn't mean that's true because Grock can lie all the time.

Starting point is 01:26:12 But then ask for the documentation and continue to look at it. You'll find that it's obviously document. documented that Herschel himself, the original, the idea, the founder behind Zionism on the record was an atheist and that had written terrible things about Jews in his diary. The point was that it was something that was manipulated. It was taken. It was used. And the world is seeing that today.

Starting point is 01:26:34 I shouldn't even need to manipulate. There shouldn't even need to explain that manipulation, right? Because I think it's very obvious and everyone's coming to terms with it. But there are still those out there trying to convince you that you're wrong. Like the ones out there that were saying you were a bad person for even suggesting the COVID shot was dangerous. They are always there, guys, and I think most of them are dishonest today. But what I'm highlighting is the reality of the Israeli government and the Zionist elements

Starting point is 01:26:56 within it. And yes, there's a Jewish overlap to that, but there's also an atheist overlap. There's also a Christian overlap. So you can choose to focus on one. That's about you. The bottom line is they are influencing, infiltrating governments. And people are starting to understand that. And we can see it if we're paying attention.

Starting point is 01:27:11 Here is Rokana telling you what him and Massey are going to be doing about the 224 discussion. Thomas Massey and I are teaming up again to remove Section 224 from our defense bill. Section 224 is a first step in integrating our military with Israel's military. I'm a senior member of the Armed Services Committee, and I will be introducing an amendment to remove Section 224. Basically, the establishment has figured out that direct aid to Israel is unpopular. So they want to do an end run around the foreign sales process. The foreign sales at least requires a commitment to upholding human rights. Under this section, you would have a fusion of the United States and Israel military.

Starting point is 01:27:55 So there's no human rights test and no vote on aid. We need to strip Section 224. So isn't it interesting that you now even have Rokana openly saying what some people in the government are calling conspiracy theory, openly saying that this merges the U.S. military? It's just we need to get past this, this game of pretending like you, you know, the facts are what matter, guys. And you can look for yourself and read the things for yourself and understand, call it whatever you want. I'm not okay with whatever this is saying, right? And oh, you think there's Jews taking over the country.

Starting point is 01:28:30 Stop with this game. The words in the legislation that say that that's happening are not what Americans want. It's very simple. And he's coming out and saying that, now whether he agrees it or not, whether him and Massey are playing, a role to try to get you. I mean, you could, we should question that. It doesn't matter in my mind at the moment. It matters that they're saying what we agree with and that we believe, you know, that ultimately it's worth pointing to, let's put it that way. I don't trust any of them. I don't, I don't believe our voting system translates to the outcome. But anyone, whether Marjorie

Starting point is 01:28:59 or anybody saying something that I think is appropriate and accurate, I'll point to. And so what he's doing there is saying they're going to try to stop it, which is good, I argue. But my point back to the beginning was I worried that this is ultimately aiming at one thing and acting like that's going to stop the problem when the problem is already there. It exists whether or not this happens or whether or not this passes. Think about that. So even if they stop it, we still need to make sure we're not going to lose side of the problem, which is ultimately what I think this might be used for. Now, Massey posted this on the third. Still on the conversation of Israel, Israel has used American supplied munitions to kill tens of thousands of innocent civilians. Easily

Starting point is 01:29:39 verifiable, America is morally obligated to end support of Israel. devastation of Gaza and its people, or Syria, or Lebanon, or any number of other locations, or, you know, literally go on. I'm corresponding, co-sponsoring, excuse me, he says, the block, the bombs act to limit the transfer of offensive weapons to Israel. I can almost guarantee you that won't pass. Because most everybody in our government doesn't want that to happen, even though most Americans want it to stop.

Starting point is 01:30:06 See you easy to see, guys, that means their government doesn't represent you, or most Americans, for that matter. Not hard to understand that. at least under a guise of democracy, right? The idea that they represent, they're the living embodiment of our will. That's not true. You may argue that they, you know,

Starting point is 01:30:20 you'll vote someone in later that might finally do what you want and you can call that democracy. It's not, but at least some form of representative government, but at the end of the day, it's not representation when they're continually being lobbied to do things that are not in your interest. The system's broken, guys,

Starting point is 01:30:35 and voting people in is not going to change that. Now, this list that goes on, for quite a while many, many, many doctors that highlights them telling you verbatim what they saw, what they were, what they witnessed, what they treated, what, you know, they're telling you, we watched them kill children, we watch Israel assassinate doctors, we watched them bury them in mass graves, on and on and on, women and grown men, grizzled hardcore people that have been to many war zones, breaking down crying because they saw the things they did. I mean, it's just, you can't be overstated. It goes on, guys, on and on and on. It's incredible. I'll include this

Starting point is 01:31:12 because I want you to remember, I want you to remember all the different examples we have that you can prove of people that firsthand witnessed them killing children or killing innocent people. Excuse me, sorry. And that is the Israeli government, supported by the U.K. government, supported by the U.S. government, supported by any number of Western governments and around the world. So on the same vein of conversation, May 15th, Pentagon quietly shut legally required program to prevent citizen deaths by military. Now think about this.

Starting point is 01:31:44 Now, I argue this is something they were doing anyway. Not caring, lying about it. But as we continue to get this drive and what Trump is clearly pushing, it's in line with what Israel is doing and how their government operates, they suddenly just quietly remove the mechanism which they even pretend they monitor civilian deaths? Yes. The Pentagon has quietly dismantled a program. It is legally required to operate to prevent and respond to civilian deaths.

Starting point is 01:32:09 deaths in the U.S. operations that we can all see are creating civilian deaths. A report released by the department's inspector general concluded the U.S. military no longer has the people, tools, or infrastructure needed to comply with the two federal statutes, requiring it to maintain a functioning civilian casualty policy. Oh, we're just not capable. So is that how that works? Can I just go, sorry, guys, the law isn't apply because I'm just tired today, right? I'm not able to.

Starting point is 01:32:36 I strain my ankle, so I'm not allowed to, you know, I'm just going to break the law. It's stupid. I mean, the idea that it's a law. The reality is you're legally required to and on top of that, it's obviously a moral obligation. They don't care about any of that. Donald Trump's administration has been accused of making deep cuts to the Pentagon's civilian harm mitigation and response program and whatever you think of it. It's not the point. My point is the public appearance of this. Designed to handle training and procedures critical and limiting civilian harm in theaters of war. Well, Hanks said told you right at the gate we're maximizing punishment or maximizing.

Starting point is 01:33:09 We are going to hurt people. We're going to kill civilians. He told you this. While the program has not been officially canceled, the Inspector General's report said that funding had ended for a data management platform. Funny how they fund every other data management platform. Committee meetings had halted and many dedicated personnel had been lost or reassigned. So it's there, but not.

Starting point is 01:33:30 Perfect. The program was created by Lloyd Austin, then defense secretary in January 2022 under Joe Biden, following years of deadly U.S. bombing campaigns in years. Yemen, Iraq, Syria, Afghanistan, after which they didn't slow down at all. So let's not pretend that Biden's any better. Air Wars, a civilian harm monitor, estimated that U.S. drone and air strikes killed at least 22,000 civilians, and perhaps as many as 48,000.

Starting point is 01:33:56 In the 20 years after the 9-11 terrorist attacks in 2001, it's way more than that. Limiting casualties has not been a top priority during Hexas tenure at the Department of War. Reparited last September for the Department of Defense, which was previously rebranded the Department of Defense all the years before for the same reason now they're going back to the direction when pressed on civilian casualties in iran higseth had pivoted to blame the iranian regime for placing rocket launchers which we've never seen verifiably in the place he's pointing to in civilian areas and also claimed no no no nation in history had taken more precautions than the u.s to avoid civilian deaths i mean he is quite literally using the identical argument from

Starting point is 01:34:34 israel that's exactly what is wrong there's human shields and tunnels and and there we have no government government in the world has taken more. That's exactly what Israel did. Guess what? They're lying to you, seeing as how their very first bombing campaign killed almost 200 people, civilians, children, women, girls, and continued sense, guys. I mean, and then no government's taking more precaution. That's simply not true. My point, though, overall, is your bombing civilian locations on the record, guys. There's tons of evidence. There's CCTV cameras. You have to understand. You can put, this is not Gaza. And they're bombing Beirut. They're bombing Tehran. They're bombing the densely packed civilian locations. It's like bombing the middle of New York City guys and acting like

Starting point is 01:35:17 you're bombing a Samas Tunnel. It's an ISIS tunnel. Bomb New York City. Does that make sense to you? Does it? Think about it for a second. If they argued that ISIS had tunnels or some other weird Orthodox group had tunnels under New York City. Oh, they bombed them because they're terrorists. Okay, well, is that okay to bomb the building full of civilians? Does anybody in America agree with that? not, then why would you agree with it happening anywhere else? In Lebanon, in Gaza, anywhere. Think about it. It says, quote, my assessment is that they've left a semblance of the department because Hegset was taking heat for illegal operations, right? And apparently this clown does know what to do other than just to say, shut up, go away. Right? That's what it looks like

Starting point is 01:35:59 when you're not a politician, right? When you get shoved into this position because you like what Trump says. He described a stream of forced resignations and halted investigations since Hegsetth assumed the post, saying there were only seven people left reporting to the program, and they are, quote, locked out of all operations, and have been relegated to a closet office in Virginia. So let's be clear, it's a deliberate choice to pretend it's still there, but by shoving them in a corner and giving them nothing to do.

Starting point is 01:36:26 So if this was about resources, you wouldn't be wasting people doing nothing, would you, Hegseth? You would simply use them somewhere else and say you've had no resources. You're literally wasting resources and pretending that you don't have enough to stop people from holding you accountable. It's not going to work, I argue, at least not publicly, in the sense of, like, I doubt there's accountability, but we see it. And you might have seen this.

Starting point is 01:36:48 I'll play it again later or just pointed out anyway. Here we are talking about civilian casualties. You've got Ben Gavir that comes out and says, the suburbs of Beirut need to be flattened. That's how you really hurt them. You flatten the suburbs. He said it repeats it three times in the statement down here. All verified. You can look it up for yourself.

Starting point is 01:37:05 It's exactly what he did say. Now, what's crazy about this is that people are on. now acting like Pierce Morgan. Oh, they're the bad ones. No, they're really, they are, but Netanyahu is just as bad. And I said to Pierce Morgan, who made the argument about them, I'll say, what, are they bad apples, peers? Like Netanyahu is not exactly the same. Like the reality that I could show you videos of most of the Knesset openly calling for the death of Palestinians, they are people trying to gaslight you into accepting that if you get rid of that guy, it's still okay. They're bad people, guys. They know what they're doing.

Starting point is 01:37:34 Israeli officials flatten the suburbs of Beirut, Western media, Israel expanding incursion against Tesbola, exactly. Now, on Gaza, again, important to highlight that this is one of the most obvious genocides we've ever seen. It's documented. It's, it's live streamed. You can't pretend this is not exactly what it looks like. Now, by the way, there are images going around showing the, a peer in Gaza from 2025 to

Starting point is 01:37:59 2003, comparing the old version, and everyone's claiming it's AI. I look for myself. In fact, let me see if I grabbed it, it was, I didn't include it today. I think I'll do another point. I think I include it with the AI thing. We'll touch on tomorrow. What's crazy about it is you can look at it. I can show you other satellite images of that port and showing you it is absolutely demolished.

Starting point is 01:38:20 But if you put that image in AI or whatever, AI or whatever those ones, the checkers are, it'll say it's a deep fake. But what I found out was like I keep trying to show you guys. Somebody altered something on that image. And now it goes, oh, that was altered. That's a big fake. It's not, though. The image is real and you can prove it.

Starting point is 01:38:37 but because somebody brushed out something somewhere, they argue the whole thing's fake. That's not the point. Or rather, that's not the reality. It is simply altered in some way and didn't change the material reality of the picture, which was that the peer was completely genocided just like this. Now, this is a picture of Rafa.

Starting point is 01:38:53 And you've been seeing it as I've been talking, guys. You can't pretend that is not an absolute decimation of an entire society. That is what the Amalek argument is. Not a stone on a stone. Destroy the entire thing. Flatten it. They've been telling you this.

Starting point is 01:39:04 As he says, flattened the suburbs. Well, you're looking at that, guys. Now again, I don't think I need to convince all of you. Frankly, I think everyone watching this probably already is on the same, you know, aware of this. And people that need to hear it probably never even realized we exist, but still we need to try. Disgusting. Here is an interesting one that looks like Twitter deleted, by the way. Now, correct me if I'm wrong.

Starting point is 01:39:28 Well, first, this is Scott Horton says, bear witness. They did this with the money they took right out of your paycheck. May 25th. He's really strike on a tent and con Yunus today. remember the safe location, remember that, served the foot, severed the foot of a one-month-old infant. The infant's mother and a six-year-old girl

Starting point is 01:39:46 were also killed in the same attack. Now, correct me if I'm wrong, guys. I don't know, I don't believe that as a poster on this platform that you can delete just the video, can you? And I'm asking, because I don't think so. You tell me, what I argue is this is a video that was removed by Twitter.

Starting point is 01:40:01 The DropSight News still has the post, but the video is gone. I mean, these are graphic. If you want to watch them, why would they delete one and not the others? I think I have an opinion, but you can decide for yourself. The point is, guys,

Starting point is 01:40:13 six-year-old girl, woman killed and Israeli attack on a tent in communists. Tents, literal tents where people are trying to survive and their families are dying in front of them and they're still bombing them. That's her right there. She's a terrorist?

Starting point is 01:40:28 You can verify all this, guys. This is undeniable and it's obvious. Israel is owning this stuff. They're still telling you they're fighting Hamas. They initiated the new Hamas, I mean, it's just all blending into the background for some people. This is what's still happening as Twitter tries to hide it from you. Drop site news.

Starting point is 01:40:47 We just briefly pointed this out on the show with Steve. New York Times called every major Gaza city a Hamas stronghold a new book documents. Now, this is very simple math here, guys. They simply used Hamas stronghold 154 times about different locations. So what they're highlighting in this, which you can go into yourself, is that if you simply, basically what they're showing you is that the vast majority of all of Gaza were Hamas strongholds and you can prove that's not true. But what New York Times did was gaslights you into supporting a genocide.

Starting point is 01:41:20 And just to make this point even more clear about the dishonesty of the media and what our governments do, the Atlantic post this, Benjamin Netanyahu's long career was built on conflict avoidance. Seriously. Then October 7th transformed and radicalized him. Yeir Rosenberg argues. Oh, by the way, incorrect. Netanyahu, by his own admission, has been trying to pull the U.S. into war with Iran for decades. You know, it's funny, I should have waited before I did that,

Starting point is 01:41:46 because what it said a second ago was a different one. It was even citing a Snopes thing, I think, arguing that Israel has, I forget what exactly said. Damn it, I wish I remembered it. Same point, though. Point is, that's incorrect. Netanyahu has been arguable, on the record, has been trying to create the circumstance forever,

Starting point is 01:42:02 but has been trying to manipulate through war through the United States our entire lives. I can play you the videos over and over. In fact, I might as well. Because the reality, guys, it's always been this clear. It's like, it's not, it's like not admitting that Netanyahu was openly saying this about, you know, funding Hamas or any number of other examples. He's been trying to get the U.S. government to war with Iran and plenty of others, long as I've been doing this. If you take away the Soviet Union and its chief proxy, the PLO, international terrorism would collapse. If you take out Saddam, Saddam's regime, I guarantee you that it will have enormous positive reverberations on the region.

Starting point is 01:42:44 Obviously we'd like to see a regime change, at least I would, in Iran, just as I would like to see in Iraq. The question now is a practical question. What is the best place to proceed? It's not a question of whether Iraq's regime should be taken out, but when should it be taken out? It's not a question of whether you'd like to see a regime change in Iran, but how do it change? Are there any other nations that you would recommend that the United States launch preemptive attacks upon at this point? The answer is categorically yes. The two nations that are vying competing with each other, who will be the first to achieve nuclear weapons, is Iraq and Iran.

Starting point is 01:43:18 A third nation, by the way, is Libya as well. Libya is trying very rapidly to build an atomic bomb capability. So you have here now three nations. All stand together to stop Iran's march of conquest, subjugation, and terror. I know that no matter on which side of the aisle you sit, you stand with Israel. Constant. It's crazy.

Starting point is 01:44:16 But he's been doing that our entire lives. He's been trying to convince this country to go to war for different reasons our entire lives. Now, what's interesting is you can stand back and recognize that each one of those locations had pretty predominant Christian populations until that they destroyed them. Iraq, Syria, as much as they lie about that. And also, we're very important biblical locations until they utterly destroy. their entire civilizations. No big deal.

Starting point is 01:44:39 So on this point, this is, before we get into Iran, and we're going to finish with the updates of what's going on. And frankly, honestly, I don't, I think most of you are probably already aware of where we are. I want to highlight a couple important things that I have been talking about, that I want to be considered now, like looking back from the beginning of this, this part of the Iran war and understanding the lies they've been spinning about the mines, for example, or the blockage of the straight, or these different,

Starting point is 01:45:07 different points. Now, this came out. This is from Navy Lookout. Sorry, my throat's bothered me. Independent Royal Navy News and analysis. This is from May 11, 2026. Now, this is something that I've been saying just based on deductive logic from the very beginning. In fact, plenty of other than just deductive logic, playing more. But this is based on somebody who has military experience, based on the understanding of how these things operate, okay? And it says, have sea mines been laid in the Strait of Ramos? Despite repeated reports that Iran has mined the Strait of Ramos, there is still no conclusive evidence that any minds have actually been laid. That doesn't mean they're not, by the way. To be clear, yes, they've got the capability. Yes, they've threatened it in the past.

Starting point is 01:45:44 Yes, they'd even flow to the idea now that they might do. Point is that I argue, and I think you can prove this for a lot of different reasons that they never did this time. For strategic reasons. Because in the beginning, it was quite obvious to me that Netanyahu, I think convinced Trump that when he initiated the attack, that Iran would instantly shut the straight down, as many people thought was going to happen. They did not. They restricted it specifically to the U.S. and Israel and those involved in the war. Now, the threat of the minds was added to make anybody else worry about going through, even though Iran was saying, no, you're okay. You're allowed to, not them. As they said numerous times in the beginning, they said, it's only shut to these people, to the Zionists alone.

Starting point is 01:46:23 That's what they were saying. And, you know, when they were referring to Israel, they're referring to the United States. They said the same thing. Only the ones involved in the war. I think that's super important. Now, what happened was they didn't choose to do that. And so what happened to the U.S. Israel, well, they basically had their plot flipped on them. Then they started to struggle with the situation. Now, yes, Iran is struggling with plenty of things too. But what happened is then you started to have a situation where if you simply waited, that I argue it was going to eventually hurt the U.S. and Israel more than Iran in the context of how the global thing played out, not just the financial effects against Iran. I think they've insulated themselves very well because they know

Starting point is 01:46:59 this is what the U.S. and Israel are going to do. Don't forget, before the 28th, Iran had already gone to the United Nations and said, if they attack us, we're going to bomb the countries their co-belligerents with. On the record, they said that. And so for them to turn around and bomb the country, even Kuwait and the rest of them, whether you think it's illegal or not, and we'll get to that in a minute. They said they were going to do it because they saw them as co-belligerents, and they are in a war against Iran. So back to the point, I think it's in their interest to not have done that. They still can. They still might have. But as we go through this, you'll see the other arguments, which are that you have seen ships going through,

Starting point is 01:47:33 both commercial, civilian, as well as other tankers that they let go through. You've had China tankers going through. These mines are not specific. They don't know, these aren't like high-tech things that seek out who they're just there in the water. So the point is, as this other admiral argues, and I've been arguing at the beginning,

Starting point is 01:47:50 it doesn't make any sense. And also the evidence thus far pretty much shows that they don't have them in the water. It says the admiral points out that the straight up for moose is not physically closed. like I've been saying. And there is no conclusive evidence that a sea mines have been laid.

Starting point is 01:48:04 Now, the U.S. initiated their own blockade, which, by the way, is ridiculously stupid, seeing as how their argument was to stop the blockade. But you understand there wasn't a blockade. The U.S. created it because they needed it to be blocked for their agenda. But they started Iran's doing it. We're blocking it because they make us block it.

Starting point is 01:48:21 So it's Iran's fault. It's not working. But it's clearly what the game was to kind of flip the onus onto Iran. Now, the admiral is saying it's not closed, which you should know because you watch this show, but also that there's no minds that we can prove. It says unverified on March 10

Starting point is 01:48:36 suggests the U.S. intelligence believed a few dozen have been laid. Trump's the one that floated that out. Remember what I told you right at the beginning. If they lay any minds, they better not. That day, the reports come out. Mines have been released. And I showed you ships going through the straight.

Starting point is 01:48:52 It didn't make any sense to me. And I said, okay, but maybe they have the capability. You know, who knows? I just didn't think it made any sense. And here we are. And so now we can see that that started with them. There's been no evidence beyond that. Now it says whether any of the destroyed craft were actually laying mines is questionable,

Starting point is 01:49:07 even if they had the capability. There's a couple of different ships that they attacked, small ships, that they said were doing that. So we happened more than once where the U.S. bombed a couple of ships, they were trying to lay mines. There was also examples of the U.S. government saying they were trying to scoop up mines. But guess what? Never once have we gotten an example of any of that. There were further reports in April that that the Iranian Navy,

Starting point is 01:49:28 had laid more mines in the strait for the second time, prompting Trump to order the U.S. Navy to shoot and kill any Iranian boats laying mines. U.S. officials confirmed the Navy was operating uncrewd mine hunting systems in the street. However, there have been no announcement of them finding any mines. Why would that be? Why wouldn't they even lie about it? We found 20 of them and then just not show you. They didn't do that either.

Starting point is 01:49:52 So the point is, even though all this is happening, not one example is yet to come out. I think it's because you can prove like the rest of this that they're making these things up, like ships going through the street that are not. Despite the Iran's reputation for fanaticism, specifically they cite the RGC, they think strategically and mostly make logical decisions. Now, yes, there is fanaticism, just like there is in this government, just like there is in Israel. But to understand, and by the way, extremism is something that's a problem wherever it resides, whatever your religion, whatever your skin color, which is funny how most people seem to disagree with that. That's crazy to me. The point, though, is that this is about him telling you,

Starting point is 01:50:27 even though he sees Iran as bad guy, that he still thinks they act strategically and logical. They do. And you can clearly prove that by looking back. There are three main reasons he writes to believe that no sea mines have been laid in the strait. Firstly, although much reduced in number, no ship passing through the straits been struck.

Starting point is 01:50:45 Find that to be very important to understand. Because, see, that's how you folded in with a lie that it's blocked. Because Iran and no ships have gone through. You can prove that's not true. So there have been ships going through, and none has been struck. If this had occurred, it would have been impossible to conceal and would have been widely reported.

Starting point is 01:51:01 Secondly, mines in the Iranian inventory are not intelligent weapons capable of discriminating between vessels and regime wishes to stop and vessels it wishes to pass. They are triggered by a combination of vessel size, magnetic signature, and acoustic noise, none of which can reliably distinguish a warship from an oil tanker, never mind specific vessels. China is Iran's most significant trading partner and alongside India, and other Asian importers, represents precisely the category of neutral shipping Iran has the strongest incentive to keep moving. Mining the straight indiscriminately would damage Iranian oil exports and those of its most important

Starting point is 01:51:38 customers, as readily as it would impede American or European vessels. Iran has no mine clearance capability of its own. See how obvious this becomes? Now, it's also take one quick step back and recognize the Trump administration under Bolton lied about this before. Remember the whole limpid mind thing that was a lie that they spun and it blew, it just basically spun out

Starting point is 01:52:01 to nothing. It turned out to be boats in their harbors moving and Bolton use it to argue the Bethlehem Doctrine. It's a, you know, preemptive self-defense. We don't know what they're doing. We have to bomb them. He was so desperate to make it happen. For whatever reason, it didn't ultimately happen. But what we can see is that Iran was not

Starting point is 01:52:17 putting things in the water of the U.S. was pretending they were. Let's keep that in our minds today as they continue to pretend they're doing. that. It says thirdly, Iran already possesses more precise, controllable, and deniable means of achieving the same deterrent effect. This is always what matters to me, like the claim of gassing children in Syria. Sure, it's possible. What's the interest? What's the interest? You know, they're belligerent maniacs. Well, they're not. And you can easily prove that. Doesn't mean they're good guy, but it's clear that they're not what you're claiming they are.

Starting point is 01:52:46 So the point is, what is their interest in doing so? Why would they do the one thing that you say is the red giving them the excuse, it's always the same game, right? So Iran has the ability to do these things without you even knowing it was them that did it. Why wouldn't they do that if this is their objective? I mean, this is all very basic and deductive logic kind of stuff, guys. It's critical thinking. Iranian commandos are no longer boarding merchant vessels, mainly because their conventional Navy capability has largely been eliminated. Now, this is what the narrative is. I'm not going to say I know that it's been largely eliminated or part of it or half of it. But what is the is undeniably clear, as we'll go more in a second,

Starting point is 01:53:23 is that it's not entirely gone. Even though Rubio came out yet again and said their Navy is entirely gone. Funny enough, I was speaking with somebody who, you know, there's, anyway, there's somebody who is somebody who is, somebody who is, somebody who is somebody who is about this topic. This story comes up and you go, but Iran has nothing left to fire. It's like, well, they do, though. And this is what's crazy to me is that the reality of the conversation is that it's obvious

Starting point is 01:53:48 if you just look, that they still have naval ships, that they still have plenty of munitions, that they're still, in fact, engaging. I mean, you can't bomb Kuwait and Bahrain if they don't have any more. So the game is this R, you know, they don't have anything left, and they're defeated, and that we already won, and nobody wants to admit it,

Starting point is 01:54:03 other than the fact that you can easily prove those things aren't accurate. Now, again, maybe they're closer to what Trump is saying that we realize, but it's not what they're claiming. This is, however, fast boats equipped with limpid mines, one-way attack UAVs or USVs and ballistic missiles, can all be directed at specific vessels while leaving friendly traffic undisturbed, which hasn't happened.

Starting point is 01:54:24 That's what he said at the beginning part is if we had a boat that was blown up and was connected to this, it would have already been discussed. Every one of the ships that have had some kind of conflict in here has been because of either Iran or the U.S. or Israel engaging with them. And most of the ones Iran have engaged with have been simply the turrent and turned them back and they have sailed away with no actual casualties. However, fast boats equipped, oh, I read that, continues, there are the weapons of Ron has actually deployed throughout the conflict.

Starting point is 01:54:50 These are the weapons. They've deployed. They argue. The declaration of a minefield, by contrast, achieves a near identical psychological effect on ship owners and insurers at zero cost and zero military risk. Announcing that a minefield exists in an area that conveniently overlaps the traditional traffic separation scheme in Omani Waters costs Iran nothing.

Starting point is 01:55:10 Now, I'll address that the second. It's a good point and stops traffic just as effectively as an actual laying of one. The balance of evidence suggests the declaration is. the weapon, not the mines. Now, I agree. It's a good point. However, there's only ever been two, as far as I can remember, examples of Iran saying they could mine the straight. I have not yet seen them going, we have thrown mines in front of your boats. I can be wrong on that. There's plenty of stuff going around that I'm not seeing. But my point is that what he's simply arguing is that Iran, the threat that they laid out is the weapon. I look at the exact opposite, that Trump is the one

Starting point is 01:55:45 who floated the idea because they're the ones that wanted to use the weapon. The psychological threat of mines were used by U.S. and Israel to stop people from wanting to go through the straight because they still could. You get what I'm saying? I mean, I find that to be very important. But either way, even if it was the way he's framing it, it's still important to realize the evidence suggests that there never were mines in the water. And that Trump and the rest have still used that to their benefit.

Starting point is 01:56:08 As a cheap and effective option for completely halting commercial shipping, the mine threat remains and there can be no room for complacency, simply meaning insurance, right? That was a big part of this. They're groups that are not able, financially or whatever else, able to go through because of the simple threat that it could be. And who's pushing that? Rubio, Trump, Netanyahu.

Starting point is 01:56:31 That's very important, I think. Now, on the nuclear side of this, because all these things are spinning around right now because of what they're trying to do, this is really important because it's another thing we've talked about extensively. Right now, another thing Rubio said, that I don't need to play them all for you. He's just repeating Trump's talking points

Starting point is 01:56:47 are that they refuse to denounce a nuclear weapon. They keep saying that. And it's one of the most infuriating arguments because guess what, guys, they've repeatedly, incessantly denounced that they want one. Now, they could be lying, right? The point as always is Trump, Rubio, they're not saying Iran lied to us.

Starting point is 01:57:08 They're saying Iran refuses to give up their weapons. their fuse is to denounce nuclear weapons, other than the 35 times they've openly denounced nuclear weapons, right? I mean, it's a lie, guys, it's a flat lie, which shows you that they are, they're just simply creating the illusion that Iran is a nuclear terror. When Iran is openly saying that's not true, is outlining what, I mean, we've got over all of this.

Starting point is 01:57:31 The JCPOA, the adherence, I mean, guys, you want to, you want to laugh. Go watch Dave Rubin get utterly crushed by a bunch of millennials when he has no idea what's going on in the conversation, or he chose to go up there and make a fool of himself to lie for Trump? I don't know. The guy is apparently thinking that he thinks Gaza war is over. Apparently every narrative Trump has said he's still backing up. It's just mind-blowing to me.

Starting point is 01:57:52 By the way, he has me blocked on Twitter. Perfectly makes sense. So what I'm going to show you, even from Wikipedia, which doesn't even get, this is a fraction of the examples, Iran has incessantly continued to say that we are not seeking nuclear weapons. I'm not saying it's, I mean, even right now we'll get into a point of maybe tomorrow. which, by the way, they would have a legal right to do like every other country. But the point is, they're not based on the evidence and claim they never will.

Starting point is 01:58:18 But because of what's happening, I could see a world of which they rationalize it. It doesn't suddenly justify their illegal actions, guys. It's this insane, broken, you know, math, matter of the logic there. But Iran stands under Wikipedia's kind of like overview of the years. Iran states that these purpose of its nuclear program is the generation of power and that any other use would be a violation of the nuclear non-proliferation treaty of which it's a signatory, which, yes, was signed under the Shah, but understand, and the entire creation of this dynamic, by the way, the IAA and all of it, but the point was that Iran has maintained it.

Starting point is 01:58:55 So even though it was signed under the illegal occupation of the U.S. and Israel, Iran has maintained their adherence to the treaty publicly, on the record, and you can argue they're secretly doing something. You could always argue that, but the evidence doesn't back it up. So what they're saying, which is true, Israel is not a signatory of the non-proliferation treaty. Very telling. But Iran is saying we've signed this, right?

Starting point is 01:59:17 So we've agreed. We will not continue to proliferate and create nuclear weapons or even try. But because we sign this, it gives us the right to nuclear energy. It does, you understand. So how crazy it is that they can say you're not allowed to have any of it when that's illegal. You've agreed, we're part of this. Israel won't even sign the document. And you're telling us we can't have nuclear.

Starting point is 01:59:36 energy. Just understand that just because you go bad guy, you can't, you know, this is what our government has always done. There's no, there's nothing that is sacred. There's no law that is followed as long as they go, we don't want them to do that. And half the time they're lying about it. It continues to say, of which is a signatory as well as being against Islamic religious principles. So they're saying having a nuclear weapon in general is at currently what they call Fokwa. Iran claims that nuclear weapon is necessary for a booming population and rapidly industrializing nation. Now, you could disagree with that. The point is they have a legal right to do it and are part of the treaty, which allows them that in any way they should be allowed to have what anybody other

Starting point is 02:00:13 country is allowed to do. Iran states it has a legal right to enrich uranium for peaceful purposes under the NPT. It does. And further says that it, quote, has consistently complied with its obligations under the non-proliferation treaty and the statute of the International Atomic Energy Agency. Guess what? They have. That's not a personal statement. You can easily verify that they have met these. The point is they've been argued against by Israel in the United States. They're lying. They're hiding this. Their secret. And every time they continue to be shown to be lying. How many times Netanyahu stood up with his graphs and his CD-ROMs and says, this is all proof. And how many times it has been shown to be a lie? And I mean, like from the international

Starting point is 02:00:54 community level, the last one with that wall of CD-ROMs he did, it turned out that was all old information from a previous argument. You got, I mean, are we surprised? Look at how many times they've been caught flimsy, like the most embarrassing propaganda during their ongoing genocide. So the point, they have the right to do it. And of course, they've complied with the, I mean, whether it was the first discussion or even the JCPUA they forced them into. Twelve other countries are known to operate uranium enrichment facilities. Iran states that the failure of certain nuclear weapons states to fulfill their international

Starting point is 02:01:27 obligations continues to be a source of threat for the international community. Why are they wrong? You have groups that are claiming that they have to abide by a treaty that the U.S. and Israel are not abiding by. I believe nor is Russia. The point is that that's what they're saying. What they're doing by not stopping their production of nuclear weapons is a threat to everybody. Why are they focusing on us? It's a good question, guys.

Starting point is 02:01:48 Even if you think Iran's a problem. Why is that not an issue? The tactical nukes that they're all leading into? That Trump is the one that seems to have spearheaded. It says Iran has called for the development of a follow-up committee to ensure compliance with global nuclear disarmament. funny? Since they are a signatory to the and they have the right to initiate, no one cares because the U.S. and Israel, the ones that seem to control and dictate most of this stuff today. Iran and many other nations without nuclear weapons have said that

Starting point is 02:02:14 the present situation whereby nuclear weapons states non-monopalize the right to possess nuclear weapons is highly discriminatory. Of course it is. And they have pushed for steps to accelerate the process of nuclear disarmament. Now, this is the point. When you start to say all this, people go, they just want to justify their own weapons. Well, guess what guys? What they're actually arguing when you actually understand history is for nobody to have them. And they've tried to do that numerous times. I've reported on this before. Iran has called on the state of Israel to sign the national, the non-excuse me, proliferation

Starting point is 02:02:44 treaty, except inspection of its nuclear facilities, you know, like JFK tried to do before he was killed, and place its nuclear facilities under the IAEA safeguards. Why wouldn't they want that? Iran has proposed that the Middle East, numerous times, by the way, be established as a proposed nuclear weapon free zone. Every time this gets brought up, look it up for yourself. I've covered it before.

Starting point is 02:03:09 Every time, Israel says no. I mean, this is easy to document, guys. Numerous times in the past, Iran has put this forward with basically everybody in the Middle East going, we agree, and Israel says no, and it doesn't happen. And yet they turn around and say they're the problem because they have nuclear weapons, well, they don't, and Israel continues to make them.

Starting point is 02:03:31 It's the truth. and you can easy look it up, guys. On December 3rd, 2002, 2004, Iran's former president and an Islamic cleric alluded to Iran's position on nuclear energy. He said, God willing, we expect to soon join the club of the countries that have a nuclear industry. And this is one of the statements people tend to misrepresent as meaning weapons. He says, with all its branches, except the military one, they leave that part out, in which

Starting point is 02:03:55 we are not interested. We want to get what we're entitled to. He says, I say unequivocally that for no point. price, will we be willing to relinquish our legal and international right? I also say unequivocally to those who make false claims. Iran is not pursuing nuclear weapons. My point, by the way, was to cite all the times they've openly and publicly said we don't want the thing that Rubio just said they refused to say, right up until recently, by the way. And it says Iran's not pursuing weapons. It will not give up its rights, but it will not give up its rights and they mean to the nuclear energy

Starting point is 02:04:28 direction, as he already stated. Your provocation will not make us pursue. nuclear weapons. See, that's what they are. That's what they're trying to do, I argue, in many views. By doing this, you're going to force them into that direction by then justifying that you're right all along, which there's, I, this is why I've argued, even if they wanted to right now, it is not in their interest to do so. I argue that they're in a strategic political way winning this exchange. We hope that you come to your senses soon and do not get the world involved in disputes and crises. Now, Iran's president, Mahmoud Amad Dinajee,

Starting point is 02:05:03 how I was mispronounced these, Ahmad Dinajad has publicly stated Iran is not developing nuclear weapons. On August 9th, 2005, Iran's supreme leader, Ayatollah al-Kamini, issued a fatwa, that of that the production, stockpiling, and use of nuclear weapons are forbidden under Islam, and that Iran should never require those weapons. Now, of course, what they argue is these people are religious fanatics,

Starting point is 02:05:26 And they treat this like its absolute doctrine, but then pretend they ignore that. You can't have it both ways, guys. The point is that clearly this means a lot to them. Now, not everybody is bound by these things. Not everyone agrees or believes in these ideas. But the point is it is a very, very relevant and influential part of the way their government operates, whenever you think about it, just like it is real, by the way, with their religious, not even just influence, but religious guidance at the top of their religious infrastructure.

Starting point is 02:05:54 the point is that clearly they have a Fadwa. You can look it up. So you can either argue that they believe in all this stuff and it means everything or not. You know, it's like at end of the day, the evidence is what matters, not your opinions because the evidence shows that they do not have one and are not seeking one. As I've always said, of course, it could be secret somewhere. But isn't the evidence what matters? And doesn't matter the people that have always been telling you that it's secret somewhere.

Starting point is 02:06:17 I've been caught lying over and over and over and over. It really should. Now it says in an interview in October 2011, again, President Ahmad Dinajad of Iran said, quote, we have already expressed our views, again, when put to them that you refused to announce nuclear weapons. It's been going on our entire lives. He says, we've already expressed our views about nuclear bombs.

Starting point is 02:06:39 We said those who are seeking to build nuclear bombs or those who stockpile, they are politically and mentally retarded. That's what he said. Now, meaning the real meaning of the word, like the actual definition of the word, which means like held back. You're stuck in an old time, right? It says, we think they are stupid because the era of nuclear bombs is over.

Starting point is 02:07:00 This is 2011. He says, why, for example, should Iran continue its efforts to tolerate all international treasures only to build a nuclear bomb or a few nuclear bombs that are useless that can never be used?

Starting point is 02:07:14 I mean, think about the logic of what he's saying. Like, realistically, there is no necessary other than to go in the tactical direction. In 2011, he's saying, we don't want these. You've already stated this. And this is why it doesn't even make sense for us to do so. You guys are all just holding these. It's not doing anything. It's a, it's a, you know, mutually insurer destruction kind of a game, which ultimately means nothing. And if everyone has them,

Starting point is 02:07:34 there's no point in them having them either. It's kind of the logic anyway, whether you agree with it or not. And so what he's again saying is we have already laid this out. And what happens usually when they say that is it doesn't get shown. The Wall Street Journal and the Washington Post, New York Times, just don't point to it. You know, sort of like the thousands of times, or I guess, let's see, I don't know, let's just go ahead and say 20 plus so far where Trump has gone, there's a deal. And Axios goes, there's a deal, we can tell. And then it doesn't happen.

Starting point is 02:08:00 Well, you know what never happens in that two-day process? Nobody wants to ask or even look at what Iran is saying. Because had they, had the New York Times gone and been like, what is the Ron leadership saying, they would have immediately found like I did that they go, that's not what happened. Instead, they just go, Trump says deal. And they all push it up and everyone makes money and they lie again. It swings around 45 times. So here we are where they're saying, we don't want them, and everyone ignores it.

Starting point is 02:08:24 On February 22nd, 2012, in a meeting in Tehran with the director and officials of the atomic energy organization of Iran and nuclear scientists, many of which have been killed by Israel illegally, by the way, Al-Aqqqqa mean, he said, the Iranian nation has never pursued and will never pursue nuclear weapons. There is no doubt that the decision makers in the country is opposing us know well that Iran is not after nuclear weapons because the Islamic Republic, logically, religiously, theoretically, considers the possession of nuclear weapons a grave sin and believes the proliferation of such weapons is senseless, destructive, and dangerous. So, my point again was not to say that you have to believe them, but simply acknowledge that, as Rubio yet again says they refuse to announce it, no, he's lying. No, he's lying, or either one of the dumbest, least informed people in the conversation. It's clearly both, I think, but at the end of the day, he knows, guys, he knows.

Starting point is 02:09:20 knows they've said this. He knows they've denounced it. He's just lying to you. So is Trump. So is everybody. And this is on Wikipedia, guys. And I wouldn't trust Wikipedia if I can throw it. It's about understanding that even they are acknowledging the mass adoption of these points. Now, again, I'll include this because it's insane to me that this is where we are. I'll play this really quickly to reset this table in case you forgot. Is it still, and this is for, I couldn't believe this. You've seen this. I showed up before. This is from the rapid response. This is the White House rapid response account. either that they thought this was an intelligent take and you were too dumb to know they were wrong or they didn't even know that they were wrong.

Starting point is 02:09:57 I honestly don't know where I put this. That's alarming to me. But if you remember, they lied about this. This is what Whitkoff put forward 60%. I'll explain it when I'm done if you haven't seen it. Here's what the White House put out, claiming that they're about to make all these bombs. They're wrong. They're lying.

Starting point is 02:10:13 In inspectors believe Iran has close to 1,000 pounds of uranium enriched to 60%. They don't believe it's a fact and they know it because it's documented it as Ron's admitted it and the IAEA have been there and acknowledged it. So even their 60-minute report is just repeating what Trump's administration is saying when you can literally prove according to the documented IAEA research that they knew this, they documented that they have it on the record and they put it out. And yet they're going to say that they think based on, they're trying to make it sound like it's some kind of secret thing. Nearly ready to be used in a nuclear weapon. believe Iran has close to 1,000 pounds of uranium enriched to 60%,

Starting point is 02:10:54 nearly ready to be used in a nuclear weapon. 970 pounds of 60% highly enriched uranium. What can you do with that? So that is enough material for if you enrich it just a little bit more for 10 to 11. You know, yeah, over 90% to make the material needed to make the bomb and then make the bomb and then actually find a way to move. No, that's not close, guys. You know, you could argue halfway there if not,

Starting point is 02:11:25 halfway there to being able to make the material needed to make the bomb. That is not making the bomb. He is, and this is, again, stupidity or shocking dishonesty. I kind of think it's the first one, to be honest. Nuclear bombs. Iran, that is enough material for, if you enrich it just a little bit more for 10 to 11 nuclear bombs. Iran has been lying about its nuclear weapons effort for over 20 years now.

Starting point is 02:11:54 Okay, so the 60% and the 1,000 pounds was what Iran openly acknowledged to the IAA. But they'll keep telling us they're being lied, they're lying about it somehow. Yeah. They have always claimed our program was 100% peaceful. We were never pursuing nuclear. Which all the evidence shows. Who happens? That's a lie.

Starting point is 02:12:11 Why? We have new evidence? And then once the international... See how easy it is? it's a lie. Move on. Uncontested narratives based on people from people that have been lying this entire experience. Like, it's just mind-blowing. 60 minutes? Great job. The actual inspectors got in and started finding some things out. Oh, yeah. The Iranians kept lying to them. Nope. Guys, that's not true. Understand that the JCPOA was adhered to until Trump

Starting point is 02:12:37 broke it. Since then, they've been engaging with the International Atomic Energy Agency. And as I'll show you now, for what, the fifth time? The reality, as I made clear, before this even became a talking point was that they were telling you on June 20th, 2025, the director of the International Atomic Energy Agency was openly saying very clearly that as he stated in his recent report based on the inspections that they conducted at their facilities. But yeah, keep telling us that they're being lied to. They're in there looking at this stuff. Iran's uranium stockpiles remain under safeguards in accordance with Iran's comprehensive safeguard agreement. That's literally the 400 kilograms, 1,000 pounds, give or take, of 60%.

Starting point is 02:13:24 So what I'm trying to show you is in June, as you guys probably already saw before in this show, of 2025, they were saying the amount that they just alluded to as some kind of secret thing was documented and acknowledged and was literally within their agreement. It's crazy how we can be in a position where there could be such shocking levels of dishonesty. And most of you know this probably because you saw it on the show before or some other show. but people that need to see this, like actually people that care that still are misinformed that go out and misinformed their million followers, somehow still think this isn't true. And what's important to understand is I went back and forth with somebody actually today, I think.

Starting point is 02:14:02 So I cite this and I say, well, that's ridiculous because this is what they said. And they respond going, oh, you trust the IAEA, do you? And I laugh because I'm thinking, do you know where he gets this information? Do you know where this guy gets 60% from the International Atomic Energy Agency? So what's hilarious to me is that me pointing out that that information is actually within their safeguards gets dismissed. But when he points to the same information that he didn't look up, he was told by the same group that they're saying is dismissive or that they should dismiss because of. He's simply pointing to the information that they relayed to him. And they go, oh, that means bad guy stuff.

Starting point is 02:14:39 But then I point to the same group and say, but they told you it wasn't bad. They go, oh, you trust them. You're stupid. Okay. So did you, I guess. But I don't. But it's confounding, as I'm sure you've. understood in how this works today in partisanship.

Starting point is 02:14:53 And this is the White House deliberately misinforming you, but no surprise there. I'll include this one too. Here is the Khabisi letter as of June 3rd. The International Atomic Energy Agency believes Iran's nuclear risks are now higher than before. And of course, it's going, oh, we told you they're crazy nuclear monsters. Or you could just not be a moron and recognize that that's an essential. statement by a group that goes, well, they're under attack, which argues that it's more likely that they might do the thing they've never done before. That's what they're actually saying,

Starting point is 02:15:30 but it gets convert. And look at the comments, most people are in the same opinion. But, I mean, this is not saying they are, whether there's any evidence of it. They're simply going with the circumstances, we argue the risk is higher because they're being motivated by their own survival to maybe do that. It's what they're saying. And yet, this is how desperate the people are to argue that they're all monsters and they pick that up and argue. And here is, percent. And this is an important one before we finish with this simple reality of where the Iran war is because, yes, we know this already. They destroyed the currency. They destroyed Iran's government. Just like with Venezuela, just like with Syria, just like with Bolivia, just like anywhere,

Starting point is 02:16:12 they destroyed the country and then blamed the government for why it went awry. And I can prove these to you because he said it publicly. But so he comes out on the second and says, while Iran's economy is in free fall, again, because he publicly owned to, we already know that, but I'll show you in a second where he owned to doing it himself. We destroyed their rile. We destroyed their economy. So because they destroyed their economy, the regime has chosen to co-op digital asset technologies for its own corrupt agenda. Okay. So what you're saying is because we illegally destroyed their economy, they're trying to find ways around our illegal attack on their economy. Monsters terrorists, okay, including evading sanctions, sanctions that are applied by a

Starting point is 02:16:49 corrupt organization and stopping them from doing things that aren't actually illegal. They're only illegal because you sanction normal things they're doing. It's very simple, guys. And transferring wealth out of the country, you mean trying to avoid you stealing all of their assets? I mean, you could argue any number of these things represent criminal activity. But you have to understand that you could take a completely innocent entity that has all of these functions, have a group like the U.S. government go, you're terrorists and sanction

Starting point is 02:17:14 and attack and destroy their economy and throw fake protests at them and undermine their government and then have that entity go, well, geez, we're going to try to survive. We're going to remove it. I'm not saying that you have to think that's what Iran is. I'm saying from a simple objective perspective, you can realize that all they're doing is saying that what we're doing to them means they're bad guy. And anything they do in response demonstrates they are that bad guy. It's just kind of a self-fulfilling prophecy, guys.

Starting point is 02:17:40 Iran's current economic chaos is proof that Podus's maximum pressure campaign has been a success. Yeah, because you guys destroyed their economy. So you're saying, we aim to destroy their economy. and we did. So congratulations. Well, they're still there. As promised, Treasury will continue to follow the money in support of economic fury, whether it's through the banking system or through digital assets. Why? Because they just stole a bunch of cryptocurrency from average Iranian people. I'll play that in a second. To prevent the regime from developing a nuclear weapon, right? Says this Muppet from, you know, literally how he talks. I just am blown away by this, guys.

Starting point is 02:18:14 So listen to him, tell you right here, why he was the one responsible of the Trump, and the Biden one before that and any other government who has always been doing Israel's bidding against Iran have been trying to destroy this country. And so understand while it's in free fall. So let's start there. Why is it in free fall? And if it's anybody other than Iran's fault, do you feel all this is justified? I'd like to ask you, what more can we be doing as we see us place pressure on the Ayatollah, who is no friend of the United States of America? And as we see what he is doing to the citizens of his own country and the streets. What more can we be doing to make sure that we are placing the pressure that we need to?

Starting point is 02:18:54 You got to love that great. You know, this isn't a journalist, right? But the question is so obviously leading. What else can we do to stop this evil monster terrorist regime seeking nuclear weapon go? You can do at Treasury. And what we have do is have done is created a dollar shortage in the country at a speech at the Economic Club of New York. Which directly hurts innocent civilian Iranians. On the record. In March, I outlined the strategy. It came to a swift and, I would say, grand culmination in December when one of the largest banks in Iran went under the Okay, so they did it, right? That was their campaign. It caused the banks to go under. And do you remember what people were protesting about? Oh, that's right. The issue with the banks and

Starting point is 02:19:40 the finance, the currency, yes. Many of them were very upset by. simply the fact that they were allowing the U.S. to do this, not because they wanted it, because they were unable to stop it, let's say. And they did not want the U.S. and Israel to come in and manipulate. And the second, that it was clear that outside forces were involved, everybody that backed the protest in Iran were done. The unions, everybody, they said there are foreign assets with masks, beating up police officers. That was the unions. The people that the U.S. government were pointing to saying, see, Iranian support the protest. It's just obvious that what they did created the very thing they're turning around and pointing to to justify their actions.

Starting point is 02:20:18 That's U.S. Government 101, guys. There's a run on the bank, the central bank had to print money. The Iranian currency went into free fall. Inflation exploded. As they did, he just explained. Hence, we've seen the Iranian people out on the street. I mean, he even just said, hence, we saw them the streets. So he, I don't even understand why they don't think this is admitting a crime.

Starting point is 02:20:38 You're literally saying, we created the circumstance which drove the people into the streets to protest. And then you act like that's an organic protest in support against the Iranian government. I just, I mean, they guys are either out of their depth or this is all for some grand plan that we don't see yet. We will continue monitoring all the partners, all the Iranian partners. The good news, Senator, is that we have seen, and we can see it with our fence. We have seen the Iranian leadership wiring money out of the country like crazy. I wonder why. geez why would they try to avoid you stealing their money that seems crazy that's what terrorists do so the rats are

Starting point is 02:21:18 leaving the ship my god and that is a good sign that they know the end may be near oh that's what's saying might be done today thank you john stewart so or jimmy stewart excuse me i mean come on this is just in your face like it's almost as if they want you to feel stupid i think that's part of it now as jimmy door highlights once again for the people in the back and i don't think we i hate that he still does that i know we're trying to make a point They are the terrorists, the U.S. government, which is not us, but that's what he means. We are the terrorists. I mean the U.S. government.

Starting point is 02:21:48 But I don't think it's we, guys. That's not how we should frame that. But I agree with Jimmy's point. We need to understand those in the back who aren't paying attention yet. That's what these people are, guys. Can you imagine any government they claim they're fighting doing even a fraction of this stuff? We don't even imagine. We've seen it.

Starting point is 02:22:03 In many cases, they accuse them of these things when you can later prove they didn't even do them. But that was enough to overthrow their government. Here is percent telling you they've literally. seized a billion dollars in cryptocurrencies from wallets in Iran that are Iranian people's money. I mean, this is just straight up criminal activity. Oh, here, they believe that we have seized about a billion dollars of their crypto. And just outright seized it. Just outright.

Starting point is 02:22:35 In case that was not confusing, that was confusing, by the way, I was clearly saying she was not a journalist. unless I said I misspoke. My point was that was a Congress person speaking, not a journalist. The point was that it was a leading question. Just in case that was confusing for someone in the chat. There was a member of Congress for the podcast, by the way, who was speaking and asking questions to percent.

Starting point is 02:22:56 I believe I said that, but just in case I misspoke, somebody in the chat was saying, just to clarify that, because that is important. Because my point was in Congress, it's clear that they're trying to lead these things into the idea that, you know, we're doing the right thing, as always. Back to his point. grab the wallets some of about a billion dollars of their crypto and just outright seized it just

Starting point is 02:23:18 outright grab the wallets how i mean look at that guys how can you even argue you know that that's first of all they wouldn't be able to know that that's iranian government but even if it is what makes that legal in what world is that some kind of legal act for anybody anywhere just seized it no process just took it they this is trump going take it that's what i believe why not because it's a bad guy and we're in the middle of war. That's how it happens in war. Like these people don't have anything guiding them. There's no values, there's no principles, there's no integrity. It is do what we want because we can. Very luciferian of you. Some of them may be like typing in right now and they might not realize that their wallet

Starting point is 02:23:58 had been grabbed. He's literally talking about average Iranians laughing about it. We are working with our allies all over Europe to grab villas and houses and prices and properties. And this is money that's stolen from the Iranian people. Not even remotely, guys. I mean, so what are you suggesting? I mean, anyway, you can go into this for yourself and understand what they're actually talking about. This is not new. It's what they've been doing in many locations in the past. Take Venezuela. They stole gold. They stole plenty of money. That was not the U.S. Venezuelan government slush fund. A huge portion of this, by the way, and who is the other country too?

Starting point is 02:24:36 where I believe they would have they had the I think it was in London they had been allowed oh it was wrong actually that's right that's where you go back to the Obama point and plenty of others where they were holding their gold and their resources for them until they were you know taken from them but the point is in Venezuela there was a huge part of this money that was being used to give other countries in south America like like it was like no interest or low interest loans based on their oil revenue and of course can't have that can't have other groups helping others out of poverty you know it's the US government steps on these foreign countries acting like they're helping while all they're doing is keeping them in these low positions.

Starting point is 02:25:09 You go, feel free to look back in history and understand how obvious that is. Here he is just saying, yep, we just stole it. And even if you want to pretend, it's only the Iranian government, which again, we're talking about cryptocurrency. They don't know that. The point is it would still be a crime. Now, this is just a point to laugh at some partisan takes on all this from Trump girl. She's literally saying, Trump isn't to blame for high gas prices.

Starting point is 02:25:31 Biden is. Just like, I simply said, it's just such a card. guys, both sides of this infuriatingly infantilizing two-party illusion are identical in their logic, in quotes, and willful ignorance. If you stand back, it's the same kind of blind adherence to the opinion, boxing out certain facts so you could look at it a certain way. And I said, yes, yes, Biden gutted the country, obviously, just as Trump did before him. And now Trump is putting on the final touches. But for anybody right now to pretend like the obvious in the straight of promos, the war on Iran, like somehow the only reason those prices

Starting point is 02:26:08 and gas are up or because something Biden did years ago, yes, it had a factor, guys, but that's just blind ignorant. That's willful ignorance. But really the point is it's all of them. If you can't see that by now, I'm telling you, you're lost and you will continue to be lost until you see through the two-party illusion. Now, getting into finishing on the Iran point and where we are in all this. The person, I find all that to be important. But so Mel, this out in regard to the 24th. Now remember, this has been a while in regard to how I'll have been gone. So I'm just kind of try to encapsulate kind of the series of these choices, but there's plenty of stuff in between all of this. Four o'clock yesterday, which would have been

Starting point is 02:26:47 the 23rd of March. Or, yeah, excuse me, just making sure, May, excuse me, 4 p.m. Yes, and this was Trump announced that they've made a deal. But again, it's not, honestly, I could put this at any day in the last, too, last however long it's been going on before the 28th. about two hours later, after Trump goes, it's a deal, and all the media goes, deals almost there. I was laughing while I was going to be seriously, the CNN, everybody, oh, deals close. Two hours later, a man with a long history,

Starting point is 02:27:15 actually I think this is the one before it, anyway, two hours later, a man with a long history of mental illness, who was literally involuntarily committed by the Secret Service last July, somehow gets access to a gun, shows up at an opens fire on the White House. As you guys all saw, 11 hours after that, Netanyahu decides to make a public post specifically about this shooting that is very reminiscent of his weird posts following Charlie's murder, Charlie Kirk. He made this one before ever even publicly acknowledging the very unpopular Iran deal. And within hours, it looks like the whole deal is off again.

Starting point is 02:27:50 Well, I argue it wasn't ever on the table. Now, I'm going to show you as we go through this next section here that I believe it's clear that, like I said, a long time ago, Iran is not what they, they've always shown themselves to be. strategic, right? They act with the interest of, like, it basically measured and restraint and acting with, you know, strategy in mind, not belligerence. That's not good, guy, bad guy. It's just obviously you can see the way that they played this all. The point is that since, let's just say April, which we'll get into that, when the blockade never got removed and the bombing of Lebanon continued. It's been the same ever since. Now, my point was, Iran was like, we're done, we're not talking anymore. But what it became clear was, yeah, they're still going to be

Starting point is 02:28:28 open to messages because they're not ridiculous and that they do ultimately want this to stop. And I think that's pretty clear. So Pakistan was still relaying messages. But their point was we're not negotiating anymore. We have our things we want. We want the money. We claim you now owe us because of all this. We want the straight to be in our control. We want the toll access. They've made this very clear. And we basically said that once we get these things, a month later, we can maybe start to discuss the nuclear issue. It's been the same thing ever since. So my argument was there was a moment where Trump lied. And they said, we'll give you everything.

Starting point is 02:29:01 It caused them to go fine. We'll meet Islamabad. That was the way we talked about that. And they showed up and they didn't do it. And it failed. And what I said before it, well, this is obviously going to fail if they're not going to do all those things. So since then, we got a lot of these moments like this.

Starting point is 02:29:14 And my argument why I explained that was because it's clear to me that Iran is willing to come to some kind of a table if the Trump and the rest are willing to concede these points. And so that's why they pretend that. So now it's not about whether there's a negotiation going on or a deal being made. And I guarantee they're still trying to send notes that are arguing something, but Iran continues, if you look at what they've been saying every day going back weeks, that we only will accept this and nothing else is on the table. So when they keep going, we're negotiating and the deal is almost done.

Starting point is 02:29:41 That's just them making stories up. I argue to get you to think that they're doing something different and ultimately they might, you know, and also manipulating the markets, which we covered already. It's not a small point, but it's constant. When they do this, the markets fluctuate. and I think tomorrow will go and do it more in depth. I forget what platform it was. I don't think it was. I think Reuters, I can't remember. Outlined how within what like 92% accuracy,

Starting point is 02:30:05 the people close to Trump are wildly profiting off of these choices. That's not an accident, guys. That's corruption. So anyway, back to the point, within hours, the deal fell apart. But I think it was already not happening. It was the U.S. and Trump lying about it. Now, I had one more point to that.

Starting point is 02:30:21 I think at some point, maybe right here, maybe after this. And I put this forward maybe a couple of weeks before this too, just as a thought, I feel like Trump might suddenly, if he's becoming aware of how bad this is and how he is being played to some degree, maybe he wasn't aware of that. These are all just thoughts, is that ultimately I do see a world in which Trump would start to try to make this end. But see, at the same time, I don't think he's even capable of allowing it to end in a way that doesn't make him look like he won. But my point is I do think he's deviated to some degree from what Israel wants. and that's there's a point of tension there. It may be that Trump is not even able to make these decisions.

Starting point is 02:30:58 He's not even in control. But I still sense that's what he's trying to kind of guide his, you know, he's still in front of media. He still makes statements when he's not in conversation with Netanyahu. And those things seem to suggest that he's trying to drive it away. So you can decide what that means. Some point is whether the deal was off again, I think represents nothing more than Trump trying to maneuver this away to end it.

Starting point is 02:31:18 Well, Netanyahu desperately does not want that. Now she says, call me crazy again. back to the 24th of May, she says, this is not coincidence. I don't know how they're doing it, probably some kind of mind control with noses. Now you can decide what she, what do you think about all that? The point was simply that there's an event that took place and you could discuss whether or not you think it was driven into reality that was ultimately a precursor to this thing no longer happening.

Starting point is 02:31:42 Her suggestion is that ultimately it was done to maybe scare Trump away from doing it. That depends on whether you think Trump wanted to end at that point. now Dave DeKamp anti-war.com 25th of May. Trump says it's mandatory for Muslim nations to join Abraham Accordes as part of the Iran deal. Okay.

Starting point is 02:31:59 What this shows me, and this is why I put these back to back, we can consider that Trump is trying to, you know, work this away and is not in line with Netanyahu. We will get to the, yet again, the statement from Axios pretending that Trump and Netanyahu are angry. It's a lie, guys. It's not even what actually happened.

Starting point is 02:32:16 Are you shocked? You can't be. shocked with this many times from Barack or Vee lying for Israel through Axios. It's the, it's been what? I don't even know. 15 times. My point is that you can have this conversation over here about maybe there being some kind of schism.

Starting point is 02:32:31 But the same time then, you have to acknowledge that Trump continues on his own accord to insert things that seem to sabotage the deal. In this case, why would you do, if you're this close to a deal, why would you publicly come out and go, oh, by the way, every Muslim country has to join with Israel, otherwise not going to happen. Well, guess what? that's not going to happen. President Trump said in a long post on truth social on Monday,

Starting point is 02:32:53 that it should be mandatory for Arab and Muslim states to join the Abraham Accords, to normalize relations with Israel as part of any Iran deal. That's a poison pill, guys. That's guaranteed to make it not happen. And threatened that if conditions isn't met, that the condition is not met, full-scale war would resume, quote, bigger and stronger than ever before you. Like every other time he does that.

Starting point is 02:33:13 How embarrassing. Insisting on more Muslim countries joining the Arab Accords as, a condition for an Iran deal would likely ensure that the agreement wouldn't be reached. I agree. As the Gulf Arab states that haven't normalized relations with Israel, including even though they're currently in line with this agenda, other than Oman, I argue to a degree, Qatar, Saudi Arabia have long maintained that they would not do this unless Palestinian territories were resolved.

Starting point is 02:33:41 Now, lots changed since then, but it says after Trump's post, a Saudi official told CNN that Riyadh would not normalize with Israel until an irreversible pathway toward a Palestinian state is established. I think that's simply to appease their people, quite frankly. I don't think the Saudi family cares. But it says the president said in his post that a potential agreement with Iran will only be a great deal for all or no deal at all. Back to the battlefront and shooting, but bigger and stronger than ever before. And nobody wants that, he says, you know, it's just sad how many times you can pretend like it's all happening in the not. The point here is for him to to insert this in the 25th shows me he tried to sabotage this. Now, that could be because he was

Starting point is 02:34:22 told to. You can decide. To me, that shows a different opinion, though, of him trying to make this stop while Netanyahu bombs and keeps it going, right? That shows me at least by his own actions, something trying to stop this from happening. Now, here is Ben Gavir on May 26th. Comes out and says the quiet part out loud. He says he will not allow Trump to make a deal with Iran. So that, but that's what Netanyahu feels too, you understand. But see, This is the guy who's loud and clumsy and stupid, it seems, and yells up a thing that they're trying to be tactful about. That's what Israel government seems to be, in my opinion, seen over the years, that's what keeps happening. Only recently is it something people actually notice.

Starting point is 02:35:01 But either way, he says verbatim, I won't allow Trump to make a deal with Iran. Daniel McAdams says, and this is when this first came out on the 25th, the leaked report. Leaked reports of tense phone calls. Oh, yeah, where did it come from? over Iran weren't real. They were part of a calculated strategy to mislead Tehran according to a senior Israeli security analyst.

Starting point is 02:35:26 And as Daniel McAdam says, surprise, surprise, not how many times have they pulled this before? No one believes the word they say. So at this point, it's already come out from Israel strategists that they're saying this isn't even real. They're trying to convince,

Starting point is 02:35:38 I don't think it's about Tehran. I think it's about convincing Americans that Trump is somehow adversarial with Netanyahu to give him some breathing room. Of course, this says self-defense bombs. US says it launched self-defense strikes in Iran as peace, negotiation drag on, which is what they're actually claiming.

Starting point is 02:35:54 Breaking, U.S. forces on Monday launched what U.S. Central Command described as self-defense strikes in southern Iran. Monday. So we're talking about the 2050 bomb in the midst of this supposed ongoing negotiation. Well, in any world, that would end the negotiation. But Iran continues to maintain the point that if you come to the table with our agreements, will meet it, despite what you continue to do. I don't know how you don't see that as anything other than strength in their position.

Starting point is 02:36:22 And I mean, I love this picture. U.S. Iran, defense, self-defense. Crazy. So what I'm pointing out there is that on the 25th, we're talking about them bombing them in the middle of what they claim as a deal that they're about to make. Doesn't that feel like somebody who doesn't want to make a deal? Now, U.S. military says it bombs southern Iran. This is the same report, same point anyway, on May 25th, 2026. This is from Dave DeCamp, anti-war.com.

Starting point is 02:36:46 U.S. Central Command on Monday took credit for attacks. Doesn't necessarily mean they did them, though, but it says they took credit for attacks on Iran. After Iranian media reported explosions in the southern port city of Bandar Abbas on the Strait of Ramos. In a statement to CNN, which, by the way, is it, I mean, the war is an illegal war. They started this illegally. They've got no justification. There's no congressional approval.

Starting point is 02:37:07 So continuing to bond them anywhere is, I argue, a crime. But either way, the reality is that every time Iran does something, they call it a crime, a belligerent act, a terrorist act, or a violence. of ceasefire, then what is this? Is there a world in which Israel or the U.S. can ever do something that constitutes a violation of a ceasefire? Apparently not. It literally is, by the way.

Starting point is 02:37:26 There's not even, it's a joke to pretend that an ongoing act of war like a blockade is not. The bombing of Lebanon is not. Or the acts of actually bombing Iran somehow doesn't violate the ceasefire. That's embarrassing. But they know that no one's doing anything about it, so they just keep the narratives going. They hope that people doubt themselves. That's what I think. and said in a statement to CNN sent com frame the attack on Iran as self-defense,

Starting point is 02:37:49 even though the strikes come as the U.S. is enforcing a blockade on the country. That's part of the same war of aggression, the U.S. and Israel launched against Iran in the February of 28th. Now, realized even though they've got the blockade, I continue to have shown that, and I haven't checked today, but Chinese tankers and others have gotten through. Now, I'm not sure whether that's weakness and competence or it's an illusion, like that they don't really want to block it, they just want to make it say their block, I don't know. Either way, the point is to be made

Starting point is 02:38:16 that there are some getting through. I honestly think China is more obvious because they just don't want to have that confrontation. But either way, there is a real blockade, but I just want to make clear that they're not stopping everything. And the blockade is being done by the U.S. in case you missed that. U.S. forces conducted self-defense strikes,

Starting point is 02:38:31 they say in southern Iran today. They actually called a self-defense strikes. In the middle of a ceasefire when they weren't being attacked. It's just the deserity of these people. It says to protect our troops from threats posed by Iranian forces. They said adding that the U.S. targeted missile launch sites and Iranian boats, they claim we're attempting to lay mine. We just went over this. There is no evidence to back this up.

Starting point is 02:38:54 They just randomly decided the bomb Iranian boats. I argue probably to appease Israel. U.S. Central Command continues to defend our forces while using restraint. Now, if you, look, during an ongoing ceasefire, if you believe their argument, right, if you believe they did that. then you can't say it's a ceasefire, right? If you're going to bomb them, then there is no ceasefire. If they're laying mine, there is no ceasefire. The very point that they keep stressing the ongoing ceasefire should show you that they're lying,

Starting point is 02:39:21 guys. Continuing, Adam Cochran points out what is the ongoing timeline. And this is important because Iran, just like this, that's why I showed you the statements of their nuclear intentions, because they say they refuse to say those things. No, they said them many times right up until recently. So as they keep pretending, Iran won't do this or Iran's doing that, it has since April it's been the same Iran has said the timeline is this US makes payments and unfreezes sanctions money and's blockade day one 30 days later

Starting point is 02:39:53 Iran opens the straight of Vermus now this and this is debatable in the conversation based on I would argue Iran would easily say that this could go back as long as they have control over the straight allowed to do what they're going to do whatever you think about that I'm not choosing one good or bad thing a point would be a strategic control is obvious it's what other straits have done. If you have an issue with Iran doing it, I think that speaks for itself. At the end of the day,

Starting point is 02:40:18 there's no illegality to this that's any other than what the U.S. has framed it as. They're not blocking the strait. They're not illegally seizing anything. At the end of the day, this all came about because of the U.S. is illegal war. Even the beginning of this,

Starting point is 02:40:30 they tried to make a deal where this stopped happening. Right in the beginning. The only time it became the actual control and the push for the toll was after numerous engagements, after they killed Kameini. So anyway, the point was,

Starting point is 02:40:42 after 30 days, they would then begin to discuss more things. And other 30 days, they would then begin to discuss the nuclear program. And this has been the statement for a long time. And now, within that, within that first deal, was the discussion about the toll, the money, and ultimately allowing things to go back to the way they were with that dynamic. I just, I don't agree. And money coming from Trump's administration to Iran. Good luck trying to frame that as anything other than what you've been accusing Obama of doing.

Starting point is 02:41:10 Now, this is just a quick breakdown of ABC news from the 26 forward. Negotiations plot on despite U.S. strikes on Iran. How silly is that? I think that was make sure I'd miss them. Here we go. Despite the latest U.S. strikes on Iran, again, 26th, talks toward an initial agreement to end the war continued on Tuesday. Well, again, that's not what I argue is even remotely happening.

Starting point is 02:41:34 And this is supposed to be an adversarial media agency against Trump. The point is Iran is present. and able to take mediated messages through Pakistan, and they continue to go, no, well, that's not on the table. Nope, not the table, nope, not the table. There's nothing else happening with a high-level Iranian delegation and Qatari mediators meeting in the city with the Trump administration negotiators participating from afar,

Starting point is 02:41:57 what it says. And okay, so my point, as every time I've made it clear, right now, I can't say what they're saying. Maybe Iran's changed their mind today. But we can look back. if every time they go, we're making, you know, like they say, the initial agreements to end the war continued, right? That we're basically in the midst of negotiating is what Trump keeps trying to make the case for. And then you look back two days later, or you, two days go by and you can see that Iran goes, nope, unless you give us this, we're not making a deal.

Starting point is 02:42:26 And then another thing comes around. Another week goes by, Trump goes, we're this close and we're about to make a deal. And so I point you can look back at that first time and say, well, clearly Iran wasn't close because they never changed what they really wanted. and said you never gave us that. Happened over and over and over and over. And you can keep looking back and recognizing, well, if Iran was interested, why wouldn't they've just taken this or changed what they say?

Starting point is 02:42:47 They've maintained the same stance the entire time. So you can logically deduce that the U.S. and Israel are lying about this. It's not hard. And so when they keep saying they're negotiating, I'm arguing they're not based on these obvious continual points. Maybe it changes today, just to be objective about it, right? Although the memo would allow for nuclear negotiations to take place over at least 60 days,

Starting point is 02:43:07 which again was what Adam was pointing out, the Trump administration still wants to see Iran agree to some big picture commitments before signing onto the framework. Right. And Iran says we're not going to do that. And it goes round and round and round. I mean, the only thing changing is how Trump frames him continuing to come to the table. That's what's happening.

Starting point is 02:43:24 Trump's administration keeps coming to the table and Iran keeps going, this is all we're going to ask for. That's all we want. Anything else we're not going to agree to? Over and over and over. Imagine framing that of strength. The next on the 26th, continuing, he says, the U.S. official on what led to Monday strikes in Iran.

Starting point is 02:43:43 Targets included missile launch sites in Iranian boats attempting to lay mines, which we just went through, which I argue is functionally. It's obviously not what was happening. Vance is extremely hopeful Iran will disavow nuclear weapons. Say my point? Vance told NBC News in an interview he published on Tuesday, he feels extremely hopeful the country will agree to a deal that includes commitment to, well, they did this already, guys.

Starting point is 02:44:03 They did it before, JCPOA. They agreed to this on the 28 and you bombed them. again talking about resetting the table for though i was making this point every day before we started to make sure people are new seeing this February 28th this is before they were bombed before this actually kicked off oman and the foreign minister was saying very clearly iran had agreed to everything they now say they want to give up their program to give up their stockpile they have never agreed to that before and omans foreign minister said they agreed to it and said all when you do is let peace have a chance.

Starting point is 02:44:38 It's within reach. And they bombed them that day. To stop the deal, guys, you must understand that. Because they know they don't have one. They know the narrative would get completely destroyed. You could even argue Iran called their bluff, right? Sort of like we've continued to see by Hamas, where they call their bluff.

Starting point is 02:44:54 And Israel goes, bombs them anyway. Pretty clear. So, also, we know that they have this about nuclear weapons over and over and over. We're dealing with very dishonest people, guys. Israel strikes, kill 31 people in that. Well, you go back to April. What do you hear? Iran says Lebanon is part of the ceasefire.

Starting point is 02:45:12 And if you bomb Lebanon, there is no ceasefire. Well, they've never stopped. And we'll get to the current iteration where Trump, just a few days ago, says, they're going to stop bombing Lebanon. And then that continues to not happen. Right? Very productive call with the BBNet and Yahoo of Israel. There will be no troops going to Beirut.

Starting point is 02:45:28 And they will stop bombing. They bombed them that day and have continued two cents. I mean, you can't be more embarrassing than that. You can't stand up like your, big and tough and in control, and then they just do it anyway, and then you don't even comment on it? That's pretty embarrassing. So it shows you he's not in control. They killed 31 people in 27th and Lebanon. The blockade continues, so there is no ceasefire. And clearly that's what is the U.S. is bombing things. White House says negotiations are proceeding nicely. That's my point. Nope.

Starting point is 02:46:00 You can prove that's not true because that was the 27th. Here we are, right? 27th again, Trump says Iran wants to make a deal, but he isn't satisfied. That is his, I mean, this is what I always want to frame this as, in my opinion. Since we can look back and see that that wasn't the case, right? And that Iran was the one saying, we only want these things. Nothing else is on the table. So Trump goes, give us these things. Nope, we only want these things.

Starting point is 02:46:22 Nothing else is on the table over and over and over. So he then gets refused again, or at least his team does. And so he goes, I'm close, but I'm not satisfied yet. Because he's such a weak, small person. He has to pretend like he's the one that said no. How else do you read that? that's embarrassing because again if you don't understand you can prove that's not what happened today looking back 27th continuing the u.s conducts air strikes in southern iran as we just reported

Starting point is 02:46:49 as we went over the reality purely defensive intended to maintain the ceasefire that's what they said we bombed them in the middle of a ceasefire when they weren't doing anything because we wanted to maintain the ceasefire sure who out there is actually not i mean that's that's that's I don't even know how to frame that as stupid as that is. This response is a serious warning to the enemy that any act of aggression will not go unanswered. This is Iran said they targeted, after they were targeted in these locations, the Bandar Abbas air strikes on the 28th, the 27th, rather, Iran responded saying, these acts of aggression will not go unanswered. And if you continue to do this, our response will be decisive.

Starting point is 02:47:34 the aggressor bears full responsibility for the consequences. Keep this in mind, we talk about Iran and Kuwait. It's not to say that they're justified. If it turns out they did in fact bomb that the airport, which I'm just saying that as being objective, just like we would say in any other circumstance, it appears they did. I argue that's a crime.

Starting point is 02:47:53 No questions. There's rather no question. It is a crime to bomb a civilian airport, no matter what. Even if you want to argue they're using the airport for military purposes. Same thing I said about Israel doing it. The end of the day, though, is I think it's important that we flush these things out because they keep getting caught lying about a lot of this stuff. I can prove to you that there were bombings that took place.

Starting point is 02:48:11 They said we're Iran, that we're in fact Israel trying to hit bombing of oil locations. I've already covered all this. At the end of the day, I can show you acts that Iran have already taken that I argue are crimes. Pretty one-sided, though, when you look at the big picture, overall, they said, if you do these, we will respond. So all I'm highlighting is that it was expected that they were going to respond to their attacks on Iran. And they did and they go ceasefire violation. How stupid. Kuwait air defense response to hostile missile drone threat, 28th.

Starting point is 02:48:44 Israel strikes in Lebanon didn't stop, never stopped, despite what Trump was saying. Sentcom says Iran launched missile toward Kuwait in what they called an egregious ceasefire violation. It just bombed southern Iran and they're calling this insane. And arguably it would be if there was a ceasefire, right? there is no ceasefire. My point is that there is no ceasefire. Therefore, what is the U.S. did was not a ceasefire violation, but it was a crime because this is an illegal war. Big difference. In what is called an egregious ceasefire violation, all drones were successfully intercepted, which appears to be a lie. No big deal there. They lie about everything. I'll show you in a second. Israel confirms new strikes in

Starting point is 02:49:23 Beirut, you know, just like New York City kind of a thing, right bombing in the most packed civilian location in these obviously civilian homes where rescue workers are pulling out dead children. You know, it's the same thing Israel does. IDF on the 28th claim strikes on 135 alleged Hezbole targets in 24 hours. Feel free to look closely at all of this. We've covered it extensively. I'll show you more if we finish. We're talking about civilian densely populated areas. Besant says U.S. Treasury continues to target Iranian regime. Yep. They're continuing to attack the Iranian people. 28, ceasefire still in place despite sent comm's claim of violations. So let me get this straight. you bomb Iran and you say ceasefire is okay.

Starting point is 02:50:05 Iran bombs Kuwait and you call it a ceasefire violation, but then you go, well, we're still ceasefire. It's still okay. Does that make sense to anybody? Why wouldn't they just use that to justify more action? Clearly because I think at the end of the day, we're seeing the divide between one group wanting this to go all the way and one group recognizing they've lost already.

Starting point is 02:50:25 That's what I think it shows. And that doesn't mean that one, I still argue that in my opinion, it seems only one is really in control. Netanyahu says Israel aims to control 70% of Gaza Strip. Oh yeah, we're just ignoring that now, that they're publicly telling you that we're openly violating what we told you would not, you know, the ceasefire, the yellow line. How many times we talk about it?

Starting point is 02:50:45 70% was 40%, then 50, then 60. Now it's 70. Why? Because it was designed to be this encroaching measure where they pushed the millions of people that are let, if that's even what's left, into one smaller and smaller area. You mean exactly what all of us said was ultimately going to happen? Yes, Ryan, exactly that. Exactly what we always told you Israel was wanting to do.

Starting point is 02:51:04 Exactly what we always showed you Israel and, you know, Netanyahu, Ben-Gavir, Smokra. The Israeli government has always publicly said they want to do. The statements made by the settler community that said they wanted this. And what do we get called? You're a racist. You hate Jewish people. Oh, well, here they are doing it. So I guess we just ignore it still, right?

Starting point is 02:51:26 28, 29th. Iran says talks are focused on ending war, nuclear issues not being discussed, right? Because that's where they've always been. Funny how this gets reported like new information when that's what they've been saying for months. What, and this is under 29th, negotiations still ongoing, but agreement text has not been finalized to the wrong foreign minister. Right. So what we're hearing is that it says what the Americans refer to as a maritime blockade was an illegal action from the very beginning. Correct. Both the violation of the ceasefire and an obstruction of international freedom of navigation. Yep, all the things they claim Iran is doing. We need to see in practice,

Starting point is 02:52:02 whether they will actually follow through on this statement or if it is merely propaganda. Regarding an agreement, as I said, this is Iran speaking. I speak to you now. Message exchanges are continuing, but no final agreement has been reached. Is that a point when Trump is claiming a deal has been reached? And I understand what he's, all he's saying is we're still exchanging back and forth through our mediators. Not that we're negotiating points because yet again, as you can see from May 29th forward,

Starting point is 02:52:30 because it is June 3rd, that what did they say? these are what we're demanding and we won't accept anything else. But what you get is the titles that make you feel, oh, well, there's a negotiation going on. It's not, at least up until yesterday. Today, who knows what they're discussing where I can't see it. So, end of the day, self-defense strikes. That brings us up largely to the current point. This is on June 1st.

Starting point is 02:52:56 Saeed Muhammad Montrendi points out, it's fake news yet again, where the U.S. military is quietly guiding ships through the Strait of Pram-A. Are you kidding me? The New York Times, like, I mean, think about this. As they lied about this twice now. Trump first said it was 10 ships that they gifted us. Apparently it was this secret negotiator, Ghalyboff, whatever they club. Nope, all lies.

Starting point is 02:53:18 All of it lies. And it never even got developed further. They just dropped it and moved forward, guys. And he lied about it. You could prove a GPS. That didn't happen. So either he was lied to by his team or he lied to you. So yet again, the New York Times just repeats what they were told.

Starting point is 02:53:32 The military has quietly got it. As far as I can tell, didn't even happen. 70 ships. 70 ships is what it says. As Miranda points out, fake news. Name the 70 ships. Show the ships.

Starting point is 02:53:44 It doesn't exist. I tried to find that. I don't find any evidence of any of this. Oh, what about the mines, though, guys? Didn't you tell us it was all packed with mines? But 70 ships flew through there. No problem. Yeah, no big deal.

Starting point is 02:53:56 See how stupid that is? Now, on June 1st, remember that we got the leaked reports that were showing that they lied about this. Of course, because they have to maintain the narrative, Barack Ravid gets pushed out to lie to you further. You're effing crazy. Trump fumes at Netanyahu and call on Lebanon. So this is a story yet again put out by Axios by Barack Ravid that turns out to be a lie.

Starting point is 02:54:20 How many times can we do this, guys? Because the reality is, it turns out it was about the disagreement of the social media posts and how it was framing the wrong thing. They are not at odds as far as I can tell when it comes to the adjudy. agenda on the surface. Now, I still argue that I think Trump is very uncomfortable with how this is going, but like I've said, I don't think he is in control. I don't think he has the, I think he may try to make statements that guide a different direction, make political movements that kind of force the direction where he wants, but when it comes down to it, he's not the one

Starting point is 02:54:52 choosing, which I think we can keep seeing, my opinion, but this is designed to make you think Trump's at odds with Netanyahu, therefore he's on your side as the narrative continues in the interest of Israel. a lazy last-ditch effort, I argue. Mark Caputo from Axios comes out and says, whatever the F you were doing, Trump lit in Netanyahu and shares it. And I said, only morons and propagandists are still taking it face value of Baroque or V's reporting.

Starting point is 02:55:22 Now, that doesn't mean we should disregard that it's there. Maybe, like I said with Iran, maybe this time it actually happened. But at this point, if you were blindly accepting what he reported without due diligence, you are either a moron or a propagandist. He has been verifiably wrong repeatedly on this one topic alone. It is pretty easy to see. It's a deliberate manipulation, guys. Now, what's interesting, as O.O points out,

Starting point is 02:55:47 this is somebody posting what appears to be, that's from Israeli news, by the way, which is interestingly always how this seems to go, where you get the Israeli media that breaks the thing that ever with the Western media all unanimously ignores exclusive. According to a very senior official on the prime minister's team,

Starting point is 02:56:03 on the late night Netanyahu Trump call, the Axios report is inaccurate. I would argue deliberately misrepresented. Trump did not make personal remarks about jail or claim Netanyahu is hated globally. Instead, the tense call focused on conflicting social media posts. Trump felt Netanyahu implied the war was continuing at full intensity, while Netanyahu felt Trump implied a total ceasebar.

Starting point is 02:56:25 See, what they're actually angry about is that they're the narrative that makes them look like they're lying. Not that they're actually in disagreement, but you're playing a narrative, but this is what I'm always highlighting, is that now because people are looking, they used to be where the Israeli media and what said in Hebrew wasn't pay attention to,

Starting point is 02:56:43 but now what you're getting is the contrast between him over here going, war is never going to stop, and Trump going, we're in agreement, we're ending the war. So he looks stupid. So he's not about looking stupid. Very different than saying there are odds of each other.

Starting point is 02:56:55 Trump did note that defending Israel's global position is difficult and breeds hatred. Ultimately, the call ended with an understanding, Israel will hold off on striking Beirut. They did not, as long as it is not attacked within its own borders, and then they pretended they were and continued bombing Lebanon. As always, by the way, all they will set up an argument. That's it.

Starting point is 02:57:15 If they do bad things, then we have to respond. Okay, oh, they do bad things. Now responding. 20 seconds later, that's what always happens. And so at the end of the day, they just simply set this narrative to make it look like there was a difference and then used Axios to argue that somehow they were at odds to give themselves some breathing room. But speaking of morons of propagandists, guess who took it hook, line, and sinker.

Starting point is 02:57:36 Alex Jones, 47 now publicly breaking with Netanyahu on Iran war and confirms he told his really leader, you're effing crazy. Oh, did he confirm that now? No, he did not. In fact, what he said was quite the opposite. I'll play it for you next. My God, this guy is spinning down. But guess what, guys?

Starting point is 02:57:52 Trump signs number slashing vaccines over 90. They are just trying to get you to look at it. Oh, yeah, but ball still giving you terrible things and walking back every promise. Kiving COVID-justed children. But yeah, keep telling us that they're going to split like he did over here in May 9, 2025, and was also wrong. Where he said, Alex Jones prediction that President Trump would completely cut ties with Netanyahu comes true.

Starting point is 02:58:14 And then not at all even happened. And then they've created the war and invade of the country. I mean, you just got to laugh at the stupidity, guys, because he so quickly wants to go, I did it. I was right. I called it. And you were wrong. And then never addressed that.

Starting point is 02:58:27 Like over and over and over keeps happening. Here's another example, by the way. he says, and this was posted on June 3rd, we're in a lot of danger here. This is a big boy pants world. Alex Jones rallies humanity against the globalists. And what are the globalists today? The chikoms, what are we talking about, Alex?

Starting point is 02:58:46 Are we not talking about the obvious global agenda playing out at the hands of your best friend? Or, you know, even though you pretend you hate him sometimes, but still support his midterm choices? What are we talking about? Who are you pointing to, Jones? Are we talking about the new WHO dynamic or the new U.N. Gaza Freedom City. Are we talking about Trump's tangential U.N. Security Council? Are we talking about the global overtaking of the greater Israel project or the greater North America project or technocracy? What are we talking about when you point away from Trump and talk about

Starting point is 02:59:14 globalists? The overall point is this is this game they played all the time where the real men, the big boys and the adults in the room pretend that we're blackpilled. The adults in the room recognize that you have to make a lesser of evil's choice. Oh, do they? Same game. If you follow the so-called adults in the room, well, you're going to follow them right into your technocratic prison. Understanding that we should have been screaming about this in 2024, that Kamala and Trump are the same thing. It's going in the same direction. And don't read that as voting some other direction. It's not even about you, you can still vote for them. If you think that's what you want to do, it's about acknowledging that the choice was irrelevant, that they were grifting you into a

Starting point is 02:59:53 position to justify where this was always going to go. And people like this were either too dumb or too bought off or too willfully ignorant to recognize that it was already happening. And they called us blackpilled. They called us, and this is why the IMA was literally created, guys. Whitney and Derek and myself created the Independent Media Alliance on the heels of this discussion because we were being called blackpilled and we were simply going, look at what Israel's doing. Look at what the connections are to both sides of the paradigm, the two-party illusion, and they hated us for it. Here we are.

Starting point is 03:00:24 Nobody's coming to save us. We have the keys to victory in our hands and we all have to do. Oh, do what does that mean? Voting? Supporting Trump? Supporting Massey? What is it? Another political...

Starting point is 03:00:33 I mean, this is never ending with these people. How about we try something different? Well, back to the point. Caitlin Johnstone says, here's what Barack Reveed does. He has made his whole career out of these articles telling Americans, they don't need to worry about the latest horrifying war because the president's taken care of it. Didn't Trump just say, just trust it? It all works out every time, doesn't it?

Starting point is 03:00:55 It's the same argument. Some revied headlines. from the Biden administration. Biden running out of patience with BB as Gaza hits 100 days. Scoop. Biden is frustrating call with BB to solve Palestinian revenue. Biden ultimatum to BB. Change God's a policy, or we will.

Starting point is 03:01:12 Guess what? Didn't happen any of these things. Biden, just like Trump, continued to support Israel, continued to fund their genocide, continue to turn a blind eye to anything they did. But Barack Reveed sure as hell made you think that Biden was bitten, fed up. and then supported him anyway.

Starting point is 03:01:29 It goes on and on, guys. White House temperature is very high ahead of BB call. We don't support you inside Biden's ultimate BB and then supported him. You understand what's happening here? Look at all these headlines, guys. This is the same thing we're doing now. And the same thing Alex Jones is doing. They're about to be it all.

Starting point is 03:01:46 They're crazy. Trump fumes and Netanyahu and then supports Netanyahu's choices. That's the game. Now, of course, what happened was after the supposed, you know, what do you call it? You know, the alleged issue between Trump and Netanyahu, Trump's ceasefire collapses.

Starting point is 03:02:05 As Iran ends, peace talks over, Netanyahu's bombing campaign. Yeah, so what you should read that as is nothing changed. Iran said, Lebanon's a problem, the blockade's a problem, and it was in April, and there is no ceasefire.

Starting point is 03:02:18 And so Trump is throwing things to the wall and acting like there's negotiations going on. And then they bring the thing and go, how about this? They go, no, that's still not what we asked for. And it all falls apart. But in the middle, meantime, they made billions of dollars in the market by fluctuating the numbers.

Starting point is 03:02:32 I mean, it's just constant, guys. At the end of the day, this was always going to go this direction if you were paying attention even remotely what Iran was saying. And so then you get Iran saying on the first, we're stopping messaging. So this is what I was trying to highlight. They've always allowed the mediators to exchange messages. That does not mean the same as in the midst of a negotiation. And so now they're going, look, you guys are so ridiculous, we're not even going to allow

Starting point is 03:02:55 these exchanges anymore, which I understand. believe that actually happened. I mean, it's hard to say. I would argue that it's obviously in their interest to maintain that, to understand what they are at least trying to get them to believe or do. But overall, they claim we're going to stop met the exchanges, or at least that's what their news agency claimed, and that they may block the straight if this goes forth. That's my point. I feel like all that is bluster, or at least asserting their control over the situation. Because as I think right now it's the end that there are still some back and forth through the mediators. But overall, it's just simply showing you what I've been saying from what, the 25th to

Starting point is 03:03:30 now in this conversation, that it was always going to go here because Iran has always been saying the same thing. It's just, and yet Trump spins this over and over and over. Now, on the second, Trump says the reports claiming the U.S. and Iran have stopped speaking our fake news. Well, guess what? They haven't been speaking since April. There's been mediator negotiations, but as we just read, even from the mainstream media, they're not even meeting in the same room. They're relaying information, and Iran's ultimately denying what they put forward. But Trump says, fake news reports that they've stopped speaking a few days ago are false and erroneous. The conversation between us have been going on continuously.

Starting point is 03:04:06 Guys, I can prove that's not true. This guy is so desperately trying to play the dumbest people in the room. Good. Hope it works for you. Dave Smith pointing out the absurdity of all this. Here's Jack Basobic. Trump confirms talks are continuing. See, this guy is playing the same game.

Starting point is 03:04:23 They want, oh, it's ongoing. we're almost there. Just keep pretending we're doing well. Because these people put everything on the we're winning train and they're losing. It's got to be terrible. They deserve it. But Dave Smith comes out and says, I was reliably told by you and all the rest of these fake MAGA people way back four days

Starting point is 03:04:41 ago that a deal was done. And then it was a massive win for Trump. That's what I was saying earlier. It was on Fox News. It was on CNN. I saw it when I was traveling. I think maybe it is happening, I thought. And then inevitably I saw the report where it didn't happen.

Starting point is 03:04:54 And I said, well, there you go. It was another bluster and another lie. And they all did it, though. No, it's about to happen. Maybe they fell for it. But he goes, now the best you have is he's still in the talk. He says the talks are happening while Iran says the same thing they've been saying the entire time. It's unbelievable how the supporters of Trump's idiot war continue to get everything wrong.

Starting point is 03:05:13 It really is. That's because they're being played by their own team and don't even realize it. Now, first of all, Trump came out and true social on the first and said, if Iran surrenders, admits their Navy is gone. realizing, despite the fact they just literally told you they used their Navy to bomb something, how dumb this is. But it says, and their air force is no longer with us. And if their entire military walks out of Tehran, bottom line, read it all through.

Starting point is 03:05:36 He basically says, even if we get everything we wanted, the fake news media will claim that we still lost. Do you know what that is, guys? I mean, in my opinion, he's losing. And the argument is to try to set the tone that even if we lose, that's just because the media is misrepresenting it. I find that to be kind of weak. the day, what you're continually doing is showing you that, that, I mean, look, based on what he's

Starting point is 03:05:59 doing, my assessment is probably the most accurate, because what he keeps showing you is that he's either being lied to or lying to you. There's no way around it. Simple time. We'll show you that. Iran and India, the account posts, this is the official account to the embassy, Iran and India, if you recognize our nuclear rights, which in this case applies to specifically the nuclear energy program, but would also apply to the right to be able to seek nuclear weapons, if that was what was being allowed, they're on the signing of the new, the non-proliferation treaty.

Starting point is 03:06:30 So therefore the argument, we don't want to, but either way, it's still rights, but just to be clear, the argument is about their energy program, end the wars on every front and get out of our region,

Starting point is 03:06:40 lift the naval blockade, terminate all brutal sanctions against the great people of Iran and pay for the massive destruction caused by this war. Then we will gladly tell the world that you achieved a great historic victory. See how that works?

Starting point is 03:06:51 That's exactly what I'm saying. That's all that's been happening back and forth. And it says the fake news media will say it was impossible, but everyone will know the truth. They're literally going, we'll let you win, Trump. We will let you pretend that you did it all. Do these things and we will say you did it all. You're a victory. You win.

Starting point is 03:07:08 He may, I mean, it's honestly where I think this ends up going to some degree unless it goes in a dangerous, belliger direction for Israel. But the point is it's like they just read this so obviously. They don't care about being called the winner. They care about getting what they get out of this, at least as this accounts writing. Now, Dave DeCamp on the second says the least surprising news of the day is that there is no ceasefire in Lebanon, despite Trump announcing twice on the first that there was a ceasefire in Lebanon. As we hope of highlighted, he comes out and goes, don't worry, I had a call and it's over. And then they bombed him relentlessly all day right up until now.

Starting point is 03:07:45 How do you not make fun of how stupid that is? So right now you've got all these people, and this is why I argue that most conservatives are seeing right through this because they're not dumb and they care, right? They may not care about the same things you do, but they wanted this to stop like Trump pretended he was going to, and they did not. So they look at it and go, dang it. He just said they did, and Netanyahu was doing it anyway. And then he doesn't even acknowledge that. Like, it makes you lose respect for anybody. And so for the umpteenth time, he did not do what they said was going to happen.

Starting point is 03:08:13 Netanyahu did what he wanted. Now, here is this ridiculously named Pod Force One platform saying, and this is Barack Ravid posting it. Trump confirms our story about his tough call with Netanyahu, Barack Ravid claims. Well, David Camp frames this as Trump confirms Axios publishes what the White House wants it to. You can decide. Today. Now, Axios reported that you had a phone call with BB Netanyahu, the Prime Minister of Israel, in which you were angry with him.

Starting point is 03:08:44 You said, you effing crazy. What are you effing doing? I helped you stay out of jail. Is that true? Did you speak to him in those times? I did. I always say angry. I was a little bit perturbed at his. Oh, oh, wait, wait, wait.

Starting point is 03:08:59 Okay, so I did, but I know he wasn't angry. So F you, you're fucking lunatic. That's not angry? Yeah, I think you get the point, guys. It's not even remotely what actually happened. And let's understand that we have the insight to understand that's not what happened from multiple sources outside of the baroquee who's been caught lying relentlessly.

Starting point is 03:09:16 As he continues, you'll hear it's not what he, it's not what was framed. Is that true? Did you speak to him in those terms? I did. I always say angry. I was a little bit perturbed at his, constantly fighting with Lebanon. You know, at some point I said,

Starting point is 03:09:35 Bibi, we got to stop this. Oh, you think he said that? Yeah, I'm sure. You know, B, B, B, B, we've got to stop the wars that we all wanted. Does anybody believe this guy anymore? Anybody? Like, it's just lazy what he's doing. It's just, that's, that's,

Starting point is 03:09:48 maybe, we've got to stop. we've got to stop very convincing man but the end of the day what the what the real idea was in this all on was to make make sure i didn't miss them but if is that true did you speak to him in those times i did i always say angry i was a little bit perturbed at his uh constantly fighting with lebanon yeah i'm sure i thought there's a point that i was going to forget but the lebanon point is the real thing so the end of the day you know we're talking about the ongoing war with lebanon that was on the table that if we already know that Trump allowed in fact well to it there's many points to include that we know that Trump included that in the ceasefire was on the record being

Starting point is 03:10:30 involved like with the group to put it together and Islamabad omit all the groups involved and then they went forward I think it was the Amani foreign minister or somebody from Amman that said on the record here's the deal they agreed and then then no comes out and goes no and then Trump goes out and goes, no, Lebanon's not a part of the deal. Everyone in the room is acknowledging that Trump's team and Trump himself said that was part of the deal. So Netanyahu says no, and suddenly Trump's, you know, whatever the saying is, but Trump does what he's told is what it appears to be.

Starting point is 03:11:02 So in this case, he's saying, let's not fight with Lebanon. Well, as Dave DeCamp highlights doing the excellent work he's doing, and you should be following him. As everyone is sharing the latest Axios report, it's worth noting that an Israeli official told why Net News earlier today. that Israel's threat to attack Beirut was done in coordination with the United States. I mean, these are always there if you look at all of it and not just the corporate fake news media that we're talking about, of the left and right of the government in this country.

Starting point is 03:11:29 But look at everywhere, look at Israeli media, look at independent media, look at all the information. Just like last time, Trump was aware they were bombing Lebanon, and he plays the people willing to believe him with nothing but his name. He knows they're doing this. That means he knows that civilians in Lebanon are being murdered. and he pretends like he's trying to stop it, that's evil on evil, guys. Not just murdering people and being okay with that,

Starting point is 03:11:50 but murdering them and pretending like you're saving them. That's a special kind of disgusting, and that's what Netanyahu and the United States government and all the people were talking about. That's what they do every single day. As Said Abbas Araagachi from the foreign minister of Iran says on the first for immediate attention. After all we just talked about,

Starting point is 03:12:09 all the different things of Trump saying we're dealing and talking and negotiating, here he is on the first. the ceasefire between Iran and the U.S. is unequivocally a ceasefire on all fronts. Lebanon, including Lebanon. It's a violation on one front as a violation of the ceasefire on all fronts. The U.S. and Israel are responsible for the consequences of any violation. Now, you can read this as claiming of a ceasefire.

Starting point is 03:12:32 And it's my opinion, by the way. You can argue that there's currently a ceasefire. But ask yourself why it would make sense that both sides can constantly be breaking it and they act like a ceasefire. If you listen to what they said in April, they said that this doesn't exist. The blockades of violation and it never stops, therefore there is no ceasefire. I think the point they're making is that if you're is one, you're currently violating it because you're bombing in Lebanon, that it's part of this, as they said then.

Starting point is 03:12:58 So let's talk about that. Well, actually first, let's point out the bombings, Kuwait and Bahrain. And a point in this all is just simply that this is, I mean, we already really addressed it. If you understand the reality of international law, bombing any civilian location is a crime. And I will always stand by that. And if that's exactly what they did, then I think it's a crime. But what you have to understand is that this has been driven into reality by constant, incessant, illegal actions by the people they're at war with. So by the very nature of what Israel and the U.S. were arguing they were allowed to do in Gaza, it opens the door for Iran to do all the same things. Well, we're not fighting us, an entity acting within the law. So we have to act the way we do.

Starting point is 03:13:35 Well, that's exactly the argument that Israel and the U.S. made. So why is it different for Iran? Well, because they can do what they want, apparently, the U.S. and Israel. I'm not advocating for that. I think anyone doing that is breaking the law. But just under a logical stance, you have to understand that that's what they were claiming is justified if in that position, and here is Iran being forced in that position. And even on top of that, you can argue that the U.S. and Israel are lying about that

Starting point is 03:13:57 when it comes to Gaza in regard to them being in that position. Now, Max simply says Iran is targeting U.S. bases in Kuwait, which, again, is easy to prove Iran and Iraq following U.S. attacks on Keshem Island, which are, if you're going to argue as a ceasefire, that would be a violation. If you understand the illegal war from the beginning, it's an illegal attack. Iran seems to have recognized that deterrence can only be established by forcing the U.S. regime, the mafia co-opted by Greater Israel, to recognize every terrorist action has a cost. I mean, you could argue that's him supporting it. I would argue, I don't know. It's simply just the rationalization like I was doing of why they might do it.

Starting point is 03:14:35 not to say whether it's good or bad or support or not. And so at the end of the day, there were these attacks. Now, they're arguing that they bombed these bases. Now, whether or not the hospital or the airport was part of that, it's still open the air for me. This is on the second. It's only the third today. As far as I mean, we get very little related information from what Iran is ever saying.

Starting point is 03:14:54 And so at the end of the day, if they come out and say that that wasn't part of their bombing, we should consider that. Just like you would consider if Israel or the United States said it. But then you would also consider their previous actions. You would consider their constant show of the straight or not. You would consider what is in their interest. All those things matter. At this point, I would argue that this is not in their interest,

Starting point is 03:15:13 but it doesn't mean they're not capable of doing that. Menjel said points out the Kuwait International Airport is also a U.S. military logistics base called Al-Mabarq, Air Base, or Cargo City. Well, there you go. It all comes together when you realize that regardless of the points that are necessary to include, at the end of the day, they are using it as a military base. Therefore, it legally makes it a military target. But I wanted to make sure we made those points, guys, because the truth is, it matters that we're real about this and understand that any one of these groups are capable of committing crimes.

Starting point is 03:15:45 But every time it comes down to this. And historically, it's pretty consistent. Doesn't mean we should assume ever. But follow Mitchell sin. It's important. Daniel Davis deep dive points out, I pointed out last night, he says that we would have to wait for a confirmation on the ground when the sun comes up to see if sent com was in fact telling the truth. surprise, surprise, they were not about knocking down every Iranian missile in Kuwait. This is why nobody can take anything they say at face value.

Starting point is 03:16:12 Proof of damage to Kuwait International Airport after being hit by Iranian drones. Now, this is, again, the claim of the circulating narrative. I'm not disputing it. In fact, because of what we just showed you, it actually makes sense, but we should still ask whether or not it's something they may dispute and consider that. But, I mean, if we're taking evidence at face value right now, including that it is also used as a U.S.-based dynamic, it makes sense to me. And I would argue that's the most likely reality. All this is showing is damage. And so what's interesting is if they're saying they stopped all the attacks, well, then what happened?

Starting point is 03:16:44 It just, they just, it seems like they just, why would you even deny it? Why wouldn't you just go, look what they did. We weren't expecting it. They're monsters instead of trying to pretend like you were able to stop it all. Like it's a level of hubris and narcissism that goes beyond even what makes, it's not even necessary. But that's where we are today, isn't it? Fox News comes out and says middle, and this is what I find interesting, even Fox News, Middle East tensions are on the rise after U.S. forces disabled an Iranian vessel near Carg Island, which I thought they were in a ceasefire, oops, but it says, and struck a military communication site on Kashim Island, again, same point. If you're in a ceasefire, why does that make sense?

Starting point is 03:17:21 They didn't do anything to precipitate that. It says, prompting Iran, as even Fox News rights, to launch a retaliatory attack on Kuwait and Bahrain while missiles and drones were intercepted. So if it's a retaliatory attack, then how exactly would that, you know, you get it, guys. Even Fox News is admitting it's obviously a response to their attacks on Iran. And it says, describes what happened and, you know, along the, you can watch the clip. It's only a minute and a half. You want more on what they have to say.

Starting point is 03:17:48 Now here is, now this is important. I haven't verified this. This is a, this is the official broad, Islamic Republic of Iran broadcasting account, but it's technically not the Iranian government connected account. So I, this came, I saw this right before one line. I haven't seen if there's any updates on it, but I want to include it in case it seems, because it's not some fringe account. It's in fact, they're broadcasting, but it could still be propaganda, like Fox or CNN, like

Starting point is 03:18:11 anything else. It says targeting the command center of a U.S. destroyer following violations of the regulations of the Strait of Hermous and hostile actions against Iranian vessels in the Gulf of Oman by the U.S. all of which we know happened, Iranian Navy, which they allege are gone and we know is not, targeted their command center located on a U.S. destroyer in the Gulf of Oman. that's what they're claiming. Now, this image looks to be somewhat of a stock shot fired, which is not uncommon for media to use, but we'll have to see what happens. If this was an attack, it would be a legal attack in regard to the ongoing war against Iran and literally on a military target,

Starting point is 03:18:50 but I still argue they argue it's a ceasefire violation and probably some kind of terrorist attack, but we'll have to wait and see. I mean, again, I will, I still want to argue how important it is to realize that this entire time, based on the laws of war, they could have been bombing the United States. Thank God they're not. And ask yourself why that makes sense with a group that they're telling you are a bunch of belligerent, maniac, Muslims

Starting point is 03:19:10 that want to kill everybody because they're Jews and Christians or whatever they're saying. And yet you give them the excuse. You give them the legal opening to do what you claim they've always wanted to do and they don't. Maybe it's because they don't actually do that

Starting point is 03:19:23 or want that or think that. Maybe, right? Think about that for a second. Maybe the U.S. and Israel have been lying to you your entire lives about someone they want to destroy. Maybe, right? It's amazing how we can't be.

Starting point is 03:19:34 It's quite obviously something, at least part of the conversation. But we'll have to wait and see you on these attacks and what happens next. Now, in regard to Lebanon to finish, I just want to make sure you guys recognize how constant this is. And it goes well before October 7th.

Starting point is 03:19:48 This is the June 1st point of Trump saying, he spoke to Netanyahu. No troops are going into, by the way, troops are already in Lebanon. He says, Beirut. So it's like, no troops are going to New York. but they're in Florida, right? It's like troops are occupying Lebanon.

Starting point is 03:20:02 That's the truth. U.S. or rather Israeli troops have been occupying southern Lebanon for a long time, what, 79 or whatever, but now have taken more and more territory. So the point is on top of that, he says, and any troops that are on their way have already been turned back. That's not true, by the way. Likewise, through highly placed representatives, I have very good call with Hezbollah. He did not.

Starting point is 03:20:24 And they agreed that all shooting will stop and that Israel will not attack them and that they will. So you're telling me you had a call. with Hezbollah. And Hezbollah agreed that Israel will not attack them. You could read it that way. Or you're simply arguing that Israel will not attack them because he decided that. None of that happened.

Starting point is 03:20:43 And I said, just like the last time, he told them to stop bombing, right? Like that when they didn't. And then Israel bombed even harder. And Trump reneged on the ceasefire agreement pointing, the reneged on the ceasefire agreement regarding Lebanon because Israel said, even though it was clear Trump accepted it before. What a joke? So the point here is they continued.

Starting point is 03:21:04 Here it is on the first, understand. The day that Trump says that's done, Netanyahu told the American president to go to hell this afternoon. Mel Wright says he ordered the murder of this beautiful young woman, using American bombs paid for by American taxpayers under the full military and diplomatic cover of the American government. Here is Zachary Foster, June 1st. This is on May 31st, in fact,

Starting point is 03:21:27 but it's continued ever since then. At least 41 people were killed and 140 wounded in Israeli strikes across Lebanon. He says, if Hezboa killed 41 Israelis, today or any day, the anti-Semitism industry would describe it as a barbaric and savage massacre when Israel kills 41 Lebanese people, not Hezbollah, mind you. Lebanese people, the ones they claim they're fighting for, like they pretend they're fighting for Palestinians. If they did that, if Israel kill, but rather when Israel kills 40,

Starting point is 03:21:57 Palaise, or any other group, they call it a ceasefire. Literally pretend it still maintains the ceasefire. Al Jazeera confirms Israel on the second, bombed the Lebanese hospital for the third time. The ICU is completely destroyed. A mother desperately rushing to find her premature baby alive amidst the rebel Washington is fully complicit in these war crimes. This is all timed.

Starting point is 03:22:20 You could check it for yourself. Tier Lebanon has been utterly destroyed. Like, I don't mean, I shouldn't say it like that, but they've been relentlessly bombed, rather. Israel is explicitly warning Christian. residents in southern Lebanon not to welcome Muslim residents among them. If they do, they'll bomb them. The Christian neighborhoods, they'll bomb the Christian neighbor just like they were doing in other locations. They've already done this in Lebanon, by the way. They did this in Syria.

Starting point is 03:22:43 If you dare to house the people we want to kill, we'll kill you too. Israel is now searching for Muslims hiding in addicts of Christians. It's not, it's not in 1944. Read that again. White read, Israel carried out a massacre in tear completely demolishing three buildings, where many remain trapped inside as of right now and wrecking the Jabal Amel Hospital. It's like we've seen this before. This is on the day Trump said it was stopping. Exact causally figures unknown but thought to be very serious. This one's on the second.

Starting point is 03:23:15 Israel's the Army has been bombing all over the South today, so much so I can't keep up. Here's the latest bombing in Burj, M. Esh M. Esh Mare, the Tier District. Here again is Ben Kabir. openly telling you on the day that Trump said the deal was in place and Lebanon was going to stop being bombed to flatten the suburbs of Beirut. You only don't see this if you're choosing to ignore it, guys. This is Ahmetzapah. Now, this is going back before this. 27th.

Starting point is 03:23:50 Israel committed massacres across Lebanon with 150 airstrikes in 24 hours on the first day of Id al-Ada. And the point here is that this was during a time when this was supposed to be. be a ceasefire. Didn't matter. Sky News. You guys have all seen this one. The paramedics helping the guy in the ground. They even got a still shot with the rocket in the air. It's all going around. Sky News covered it. The Israeli strike captured on camera has killed three paramedics, excuse me, in Lebanon. Just 12 hours earlier, four other medics were killed. They're not even, everyone's reporting on this now. How is this still happening? Daniel Lambert, a father and his young, or lied dying, having been hit with a precision missile U.S. made by Israel.

Starting point is 03:24:35 The ambulance crews arrived, tried to help. Israel then hits them with a missile. I already showed you the video in a previous show. All on camera, proven war crimes, yet our leaders still arm and support them. Why? It's undeniable. They're not even denying this stuff anymore. Israel is not denying it anymore.

Starting point is 03:24:52 Momon Zofa, formerly of the U.N., says Israel's wiping out entire villages in Lebanon, violating U.S. Security Council Resolution CSR 1701. the ceasefire agreement and international law with absolutely no consequences you understand that's not the same as the discussion with iran there is already an ongoing alleged ceasefire in lebanon that israel supposed to be adhering to and they do not this is insane there's another war crime international criminal court remains silent i said truly the gaza model sarah adala may 20th i urge you to check this for yourself Israel killed every single child in this first photo in southern Lebanon within less than 30 days. They were not combatants. They were children.

Starting point is 03:25:36 This is the same thing that happened in Gaza. I mean, any one of these kids could live anywhere in the world, guys. The idea that we pretend like somehow the other is a fringe, extreme part of this country. It is not what I believe the majority of people think in this country. You can disagree with me. I think it's obvious. I think we're dealing with the fringe lunatics that are supporting Zionism that act like everyone in the Republican Party supports what we're doing right now. They do not. Same thing in regard, I mean, any other category, guys, it's just obvious that this, whether or not it's the majority of believes in it or thinks that's okay is wrong.

Starting point is 03:26:11 It's disgusting. It's terrorism. Is everything we've always pretended we're fighting. No, here's Israel sitting in front of the UN complaining that Lebanon defends itself. It's unequivocal. He's saying, listen to drones they use. Look at these drones. They come up.

Starting point is 03:26:29 We can't even hear them. They shoot us. Terrorism. Think about that. While you're illegally invading a country during two separate ceasefires you're violating, occupying multiple other countries, getting exposed for infiltrating others, and you sit there with a straight face and argue that a drone, it's like claiming they got knives in their drawers at home.

Starting point is 03:26:51 Oh my God, they're terrorists. They could stab you with those knives. It's a drone. It's not some illegal drone. It's not some secret tech drone. It's a drone that shoots you when you're invading their country. and you're going to claim that the simple act of having the drone justifies your illegal actions, I mean, this is what desperation looks like to me.

Starting point is 03:27:10 This is an example of a drone used by Hizbalah. This is what we are dealing with. Now, Hizballa are using different kinds of drones. Few of them with fiber optic. These drones weigh less than two kilograms. It flies low. it is very difficult to detect and by the time you hear it above your head it's too late it can fly undetected for tens of miles and all of a sudden you you see it above your head a thin cable is what makes this

Starting point is 03:27:51 drone different it does not rely on a radio signal it cannot be easily jammed unfortunately it gives the operator, alive video feed, and direct control until impact. This is a modern waffle, cheap, precise, deadly. Yeah. And remember, as Rubio told you straightforward is exactly why we have to bomb them, because, you know, they're going to build weapons and drones that we can't stop. Right. So they're going to be able to stop your belliger at some point. So we've got to get ahead of that. Again, whatever you think about Iran, we're not talking about some nuclear missile. We're not talking about some illegal munition. We're talking about basic weaponry that everybody uses. And what they're saying is they just build better drones than we do that we can't stop.

Starting point is 03:28:34 So we can't allow them to exist, you know, because freedom and democracy and liberty. What a bunch of criminal. I mean, they're just, these are clowns. The fact they can stand there and pretend that they believe in any of the stuff that they've ever argued while doing the opposite of all of it is an insult. We're spitting in your eye, guys, and we can all see it. And as this person says, Israel who is invading Lebanon, nobody denies them. that, complained to the UN that Israel cannot invade Lebanon peacefully. It's just honorably. It's incredible.

Starting point is 03:29:03 Now, last few points to finish, just to show you where this is going. Here's the Department of State. Rubio says, Venezuela's oil, this is, he's, by the way, in front of Congress and has a ton of ridiculous things we can point to. Venezuela's oil wealth is no longer being stolen, he writes. It's going directly to pay government workers by medical equipment and is being audited. That's a significant advance. And rightly this guy says, Native American nationalist says, how long until we find out this isn't

Starting point is 03:29:31 remotely true? Guess what? It's too late. We already do. In fact, you can go back and look at plenty of other documentation. This is just from New York Times. This is from May 5th. Trump promised transparency in Venezuela, but oil secrets linger. The easily verifiable reality is that this hasn't even remotely, at best, it's something that they proposed. Check it for yourself. It is something, this is him at best highlighting what he wants to evade me do you really believe they're going to do that guys you can prove that they've been stealing that oil already what he's now saying do we have now we we know we saw us doing bad things but we're going to we're now turning it into the good stuff that we always told you would do and guess what you look into it not happening you have to realize how many things they can

Starting point is 03:30:12 stand there these people have realized they just get to lie like it's always been there but this is the whole deny deny deny sue sue that kind of mentality they are just i mean we've seen it with even the talking heads in the podcast world, where they just come out and just lie right to your face and gets backed up by the community. And we can prove they're lying. And it just doesn't matter, at least to dumb people that follow them or the people that follow the political. I think most people aren't that stupid. He's lying to you. We will follow up on this. I can, I can guarantee right now that is not actually happening. Top of that. We'll have to blow them up. Trump says, threatening an ally. Donald Trump threatened to bomb a key U.S. ally.

Starting point is 03:30:53 in the Middle East if they don't behave while responding to a question about who will control the Strait of Ramos. A reporter asked Trump at a cabinet meeting on Tuesday whether he was comfortable with Oman, who I've been telling you for months now is working with Iran to develop some Strait of Ramos Stoult, you know that. I've been telling you that. A longtime U.S. ally helping broker an end of the Iran war, jointly controlling the oil passageway with Tehran. The straight will be open to everybody, Trump says, before being asked who would control it. And he says, nobody's going to control it. We'll watch over it. What an idiot. Yeah, so nobody's, but we will. We'll control it.

Starting point is 03:31:27 It's almost as if they don't recognize how stupid this is. We all see what you're doing. You want to be in control. You want to dictate the world government. The idea that no one will control it, but we will watch over it is the dumbest thing in the you will make sure it goes the way you want it to. That's what we'll watch over it means. We'll watch over it as the steward. So you can also argue that you're in control of it.

Starting point is 03:31:52 What an idiot. And so at the end of the day, it's not open to everybody right now. It's open to everybody but you guys, right? And what you want is to be able to do that to them or anybody else you dictate. And the truth of it all, as he was where was that, you know, so Oman being involved with this, it's not, there's not a crime taking place here. Oman is, if you look into it as we've covered, it's a passive role. If this goes the direction where it's allowed to happen, Oman is saying we'll take part in it.

Starting point is 03:32:21 Now, maybe I bet you there's more behind the scenes conversations, but that's what I can prove at the very least. So Trump, I guess gets told that. Oman will behave just like everybody else or we'll have to blow them up. They understand that. They'll be fine. That's what Trump actually said. I mean, again, you have to realize that this is, it's not a parody because that's what you might feel like it is like he's trolling somebody. Because it's, if Biden had said that, do you realize what?

Starting point is 03:32:51 Trump would have said about it. He would have called him a belligerent. He would have said they, you know, we'll end all the wars and you're going, we'll just bomb them. So it's not a new war, Trump. It's just he's not whatever, what anybody pretended he was like we were telling you in 2024, by the way. The reality is just that he's a belligerent, just like all the rest. And he's willing to bomb somebody because they disagree with him or because they don't like his agenda or because they call them a mean name. It's embarrassing. That's where we are in this country, though, guys. And as George Galloway points out, it's not you. United States, here's France. France just decides to intercept a Russian tanker because I guess

Starting point is 03:33:27 that's where we are today. Our determination is steadfast and wavering. It was international sanctions. Oh, I get it. So you just are, you know, rush a bad guy. Therefore, normal things you do are now crimes. So we could just steal your oil. Yep, that's what they're doing. They're the terrorists. They're the pirates. They're the ones doing all the things that others probably do too, but that they pretend they're fighting. It's just basic, guys. It's very, very basic. But the point is to be aware of what's happening, to understand where we are, to be able to call it out correctly and have the tools with which to discuss it. Now, just repeat talking points or yell the thing that we're supposed to say, I support the current thing, but to simply understand these things

Starting point is 03:34:07 and to educate yourself on them. That's what I try to do as best I can. I'm doing that myself, guys. That's what I'm doing every day. I'm doing that for me and sharing what I'm doing with my, you know, sharing what I am learning with all of you. That's literally what this process is because, you know, I'm not first on everything out there. I go through these products with the COVID-19 discussion. I would, I've had, I mean, enough to get into detail, but I have plenty of reasons in the past to, for whatever reason, look into studies. Like, it doesn't matter.

Starting point is 03:34:35 There's examples I'm trying to think of why, but there's points I remember, like going into, you're like, you know, how does you, like understanding how they operate? But that doesn't mean I was an expert even remotely on any of these things, and still I'm not. but when it took place, I started to find more reason to dive through the studies, and then I realized, okay, it's like it behooves me to be able to understand these things. And that's very different than like being able to pronounce the words or be able to it's just understanding the way that these things function. And I also should understand how to pronounce the words, but plenty of examples of where

Starting point is 03:35:03 that's difficult throughout the medical legal, I guess you call legalese. Overall, the point is that it was important to try to grasp the way that it's used, how it can be manipulated, what they're not. saying and what that may mean, you know, like any number of things. And then basically understand the terminology, understand the processes. I did that. I took time to understand these things because it was important to me. And then very clearly became important to everybody because we recognized where the world was going. That's what I'm doing now with all of this. Don't blindly trust me. I'm not an expert, but take the time to look into this stuff. I care about this. And I do,

Starting point is 03:35:37 I mean, this is what I do for a living now. So you could take that for what it's worth. And I do care about this enough to make sure that I do my best and seek, you know, do my due diligence, seek the source material, verify my claims, question myself. And I mean, that's all we can do today. You know, I think truly if you do any of that, you are already, you know, light years ahead of the average people out there. So hopefully we'll continue to, you know, see a positive kind of, you know, grow, sorry word, inclination, but, you know, a positive continuation of the awareness of what this all is. I've been saying it since January and before. I really do think it's happening.

Starting point is 03:36:14 I think people see it and it's worth considering that. But at the end of the day, guys, take the information, get it out there, share people, talk about it, make clips, tag me, whole thing. As always, we do this because we believe in it. Now, one thing I'm going to change on this, and I think this is important for many reasons, even including how they try to box us out of like platforms like Stripe and so on. This is how you should look at this. This is not donations, right?

Starting point is 03:36:39 we put out a product this i don't like the term product but for the for the sake of this discussion point i'm making it's how you want to frame that you know we put out something we produce if you will the product is this show right you can decide whether you know and we put this out for sale or rather uh what you know like a garage sale or like a car wash where it says pay what you you know what you feel or whatever that's what we're doing we're putting this out for sale if you find value in this, show us what you think it's worth. Right? If you think it's worth zero, then pay zero.

Starting point is 03:37:14 But it is something that we're putting out for you to exchange. And whether that's just for you going out and saying things to people, learning the information, that's my price, learning the stuff we're talking about. Or you can argue it's worth $100 and you could do that too. The point, though, is that I do think it's important to exchange to frame it that way because it does change the sort of legalities of the way the system frames it. Because we are putting out something that we do. think is valuable and you can decide to pay us what it's worth. But either way, guys, we will continue

Starting point is 03:37:41 to do this because it's important. And I hope you'll continue to support us. Now, my plan is to continue to, you know, go, what's the gangbusters? I'm going to continue to do as much content as weak as I can, but I want to keep the caveat that that what's going on is still happening. And so like, like we just went through, and I hope it's not, well, I doubt it's going to be another weak kind of thing, because honestly, I don't have the money to be able to go anywhere else right now. The point, though is that it's still up there and it could take me away for a day or so but my plan is to be put in the pedal of the metal right now frankly i was kind of losing my mind not being able to talk about a lot of this stuff because it's actually getting really intense even more than what we were discussing

Starting point is 03:38:20 like the awareness of it which is a good thing guys it's a good thing but thank you for tuning in appreciate you all i love you all as always question everything come to your own conclusions stay vigilant who did they buy it from or i think they were buying it from we have We have an incredible array of possibilities of creating foreign companies that have no way being traced back to Israel, shell companies over shell companies who affect the supply chain to our favor. We create a pretend world. We are a global production company.

Starting point is 03:38:56 We write the screenplay. We're the directors. We're the producers. We're the main actors. The world is our stage. Did you see any surprises in Gaza? Surprises? Yeah.

Starting point is 03:39:06 Like the intelligence surprises. Pages, walkie to talkers. Do you know how many equipment, I mean, treated equipment do we have in these countries? You can't, you know, I do. You mean, I do? You mean booby-trapped equipment? Not only booby-trapped and spying. Manipulated equipment.

Starting point is 03:39:22 All right. In which countries you're talking about? All the countries that you can imagine.

The Last American Vagabond - New NDAA (Further) Integrates US and Israeli Militaries & The Ongoing Axios/Iran War Deception

There aren't comments yet for this episode. Click on any sentence in the transcript to leave a comment.