The Last American Vagabond - RFK Lies Again About Ending GoF Research & Returning Moroccan Migrants Violently Stopped At Border

Starting point is 00:00:00 It starts with a simple question and ends in objective reality. Reality. Through our journey from there to here, we find one another and ourselves. And as the next 24 hours breaks free from our last, we gaze onward in reflection of the day. Welcome to the daily Welcome to the daily wrap up. Monday, August 3rd, 2026. Thank you for joining me today.

Starting point is 00:00:45 I think we have a couple of things that are helping from the issues we've been having for those that have been watching our tech issues over the last couple of days. So we'll find out today. Be sure and let me know if you hear me okay and the videos are playing. I have a couple of things I want to point out

Starting point is 00:00:58 before we get started. I mentioned a, artificial intelligence sort of pledge that Derek and Whitney myself are working on. And we're running it through the IMA right now. Pretty much everybody in the IMA was interested in signing it. And what basically it'll amount to. And I'm going to be putting it out on, I think there might already be a joint post or a joint post about to go out that we were just working on.

Starting point is 00:01:23 And I'm going to be posting it to my website, which is kind of the way we designed it, not going to be something that's ultimately forced or even pressured on anybody. It's just something like a tool. So because we can tell, I think we all agree that people care about knowing not necessarily that it's all or nothing for everybody, but that people want to know, even those that accept some parts of it, they want to know to what degree content is involving artificial intelligence, whether that's, you know, like I said last time, I'm not even using to make images anymore, only because of this, not that I see a compromising issue with that in the context of what

Starting point is 00:01:54 we are going through, some people disagree, but that because I just think it's important to make that line, right? And so what it ultimately amounts to is a pledge that we and you'll read it when it comes out saying that we think it's important this is being discussed and that people who want to do this can sign on to this and what they what they're basically signing on to is and if they can they can post the pledge itself if they choose to signing on to basically being transparent about how much artificial intelligence is used in content you create articles anything for t-lav it'll be nothing right and this is the point like it'll be there's in any content creation even the ideas of images artificial intelligence won't be used

Starting point is 00:02:31 And the point is we're going to be making sure we post that and we're going to be starting, I think, some kind of an icon that we can put on things, videos, articles, like an AI with a slash through it or something that can be, you know, a signal that associates with the IMA and what we do, conscious resistance, Las American Bagabond, limited hangout, and basically post, so when you see that, you'll know, okay, that means there's no AI in here. And that's going forward going to be important. And it's just a principled stance I think we should be taking.

Starting point is 00:02:57 And like I said to everybody else, even those in the I may that are, you know, may not want to necessarily commit to it or have a different opinion. The point is that it's a personal line for everybody to draw. We all care about it. But it's important to realize that everybody has the different things they rationalize and not always with negative intention. And it's the same kind of point with anything as if we're going to be super purest about it. I mean, we shouldn't be driving cars and we shouldn't be using any technology.

Starting point is 00:03:21 That kind of perspective is out there. And I don't disagree in a super pure sense, but in a realistic sense with what we're doing, some of these things end up being necessary. And so if you disagree with that, talk about it, make that clear. Criticize people you think are doing something wrong. The point, though, is that it ends up being something that we choose for ourselves individually. And so that's why I'm choosing as for Ryan Christian, the Last American Vagabond, and through that Derek and everybody else associated with us and they're doing it for their individual sites,

Starting point is 00:03:46 that we will put it down as we don't use AI in the creation of content, period. I just think that's important. And I think everybody agrees, but it'll be being talked about more. And then what I already basically said is that ultimately, you know, so where I'm at, today with what we were dealing with, some kind of confusing memory issues and different things all over the place. I've got some really great comments from you guys out there. And like I said, I've never claimed I know what's happening. It very well could just be something I'm doing wrong, some kind of glitch, stream yard, I don't know. And that's just being objective about it.

Starting point is 00:04:15 I do feel like there's something going on. But overall, the point was what I've effectively done, which is either just working within the constraints of whatever's happening or something I should have been doing in the first place, is shrunk down what I'm doing, how much I have open, and so on. And ultimately, why I find it interesting is before this, and I mean like weeks ago, we've had our issues here and there. But what's interesting, and you may not know this, I have my window open for the show and you can see, you know, a lot of tabs. People get stressed out by it. But you may not have known that for the last year, I have like two, three other windows open with all kinds of tabs. And I know that that drains the computer, but that's why I went with what I have

Starting point is 00:04:55 in order to be able to do that. So something changed. over the last week, I don't know. And maybe that's something, I mean, I didn't do anything different here, but I'll leave it there for today. I just wanted to point that out to people. And so one more thing, if you've been following T-Lav, that I'm kind of juggling here with different things I've had to change, other browsers open because the stream-yards won't let me put, you know, blah, blah, blah.

Starting point is 00:05:15 But at the end of the day, I'm dealing with it today, which will amount to probably a much shorter show. But what, the reason I'm even saying this again today is because, you know what, whether it's just a glitch or something being done, what I find interesting is historically, this has always worked well for us that ultimately, what have I been talking about? Like, I need to make these shorter. I need to try to make content work. And here we are. You know, so we get kind of pressured into doing what will probably be a blessing in disguise. Put it that way. But we'll look at it that way either

Starting point is 00:05:42 way. Otherwise, we'll be frustrated about things like this. But today we're going to make it a pretty focus show. I've got three main points that I want to get into today that I think are important. One is about RFK Jr. and a new gain of function document that came out on the 28 that he was just doing the rounds about. And interestingly, we just did sort of a tangential slash follow-up to gain a function on the 23rd that had to do with their feigned bacteria system, which I argued was very similar. Another peer-reviewed science has argued the same. And I just talked about that, but pointed back to the gain of function. Interestingly, on the 28, they came out with a new document that said, basically what I was telling you guys, what I already knew by reading the original

Starting point is 00:06:21 document, basically that there are versions of gain of function that they are going to continue. And then he goes back on Fox and says we're ending gain of function and there's no gain of function. So I have to make that point. I mean, it's kind of crazy that he feels maybe he's, I can say and admit or be an objective that maybe he doesn't know that he's lying. But it's HHS's own document that says it and we'll go over it today. I'm going to make a point about the Board of Peace. Just a quick one, understanding where that's at with Gaza, where the ongoing genocide and

Starting point is 00:06:49 the constant violation of the alleged ceasefire that was never in place that everyone pretends is that Israel keeps violating and showing you that this alleged deal that Trump just made, that Israel is one, like I showed you, not along with it. And outright says what's in the thing is not even what Israel says they agree to. It's literally Iran 2.0 in that way. So who know, I guess this may be some tactic there. I don't know. We'll get into that. But we're also going to talk about what's going on with Spain, Morocco, and that conversation. Just a couple of updates because we did a pretty good follow up yesterday about the intelligence for the Moroccan Morocco intelligence services, just in case that's not how you say that properly,

Starting point is 00:07:27 that were found inside of these, the caravans or whatever you want to call them. And I just think that's very relevant along with New York Times relating that there are people that were told to go and what we covered yesterday. We're going to follow up with some pretty alarming stuff, especially from the image you can see showing Moroccan authorities violently threatening Moroccan's trying to come back to their territory. To me, I mean, that doesn't necessarily have to relate with the coordinated thing we're talking about. But what does that mean? I mean, I feel like it does show you there's something there, but we'll go through that today. And then finish with what's happening with Iran and some

Starting point is 00:07:59 updates. It will probably be quite a bit shorter than we're used to in the show. I want to start with one point that I just thought was interesting. Now, I haven't talked about YouTube in a long time. We're still doing our pirate channels, which I haven't changed in a long time because they're not really censoring. And ultimately, I just decided to kind of give it a long stretch and see what the differences were. Apparently at the moment, they're not. And I'll remember the channels we're using or 1,000 subscribers, whereas before we had 100,000 plus, I tend to think that the censorship really kicks in when they feel like you're getting too much reach on that platform. Regardless, I saw this when I accidentally, I was opening the window that I'm now closing every show back into the pirate channel that I was using.

Starting point is 00:08:40 And I accidentally used a different login, or I auto filled the login for the old TLAV channel and logged into it. And this is what it showed me. And I thought, oh, I'm just going to load out that I noticed. the message was different. Because we talked about this last time, right? Where ultimately YouTube hadn't, they kind of reoffered like Twitter had to all these different people. And some like David Ike, for example, got his channel back.

Starting point is 00:09:02 And I think Corbett got his channel back. I noticed that they apparently did reevaluate the channel, but very much said, well, your channel won't be put back. And it says, we've taken a careful look at your channel again. And confirmed, again, that it violates our community guidelines. Remember, guys, this literally cites back to COVID-19 misinformation. That's what the, that's what this, was when this was taken down,

Starting point is 00:09:24 it was with a video that was going over a hundred, under over a million views. We were truly starting to go truly viral over 100,000s, and they shut it down. And ever since, guys, ever since. But of course, they reevaluate and said, not you, not you. And I think we all know why.

Starting point is 00:09:41 So let's start with RFK Jr. And exactly why I think people like us in our work, I am a independent, objective, you know, actual, you know, people that actually care about the truth. They don't want that kind of content out there. Here's the clip. I'll play first.

Starting point is 00:09:56 This is what he posted. Now, before I even play the clip, I want to reiterate that we went through this back on May 9th. Literally the title in part was gain of function head fake. I literally read through the document they put out. This was May 5th, 2025, improving the safety and security of biological research. This is what they pointed to, arguing they were ending gain of function. But as I pointed out, as we went through in depth in that show and the follow up, what they were talking about was dangerous gain of function.

Starting point is 00:10:21 and they even have an acronym, which was DGOF. So they're saying specifically the dangerous versions. And as you read through this, it makes it clear that there are carve-outs for ones they want to continue. I made that clear then. I'm not going to go through the whole thing again because that would be too redundant. But please, if you want to watch the show, go through and we make it very clear that it was obvious. Just like with the COVID-19 shot they said was ending when it wasn't. They were just carving out a certain area of it for themselves.

Starting point is 00:10:48 So they're lying to you. It's simple as that. We also again followed up on this one, which was on the 23rd of July, where we talked about specifically what I said was the feinged bacteria system, which that's what this image is. Now, it's a weird thing where they take viruses and infect bacteria, which then used to cause things. It's very similar and it's a different thing, but they're doing it, which I showed. It's a lot, you know, it's like always there's just more of there's, we get overfocused on one thing and there's plenty of other variations. and my point would be that this is just, if not just, you know, can be dangerous in the same ways. And I showed plenty of peer-reviewed science that, you know, people making those exact arguments.

Starting point is 00:11:27 And this is not a, it's not an old thing, but it's not necessarily brand new, but it's something that's growing in that direction, especially now that they're trying to make it look like they're stopping gain of function. I get a feeling that this is in that category and it'll probably end up being shown as such in the future. But back to the clip, here's what he said. nothing good has ever come out of gain of function. Even that sentence alone, which he does say, well, then why are you continuing some versions of it? You didn't say nothing comes good ever of dangerous gain of function. You just said gain of function.

Starting point is 00:11:57 He really wants you to believe that they're not doing it anymore. So with the video, we seem to have no problem so far. Please let me know immediately if there's any issue. If you can't hear it, I'm just going to pull the video back and just talk about it. Okay, so let me know. Research is a kind of research where you take a pathogenesis, organism like a coronavirus and you try to make it more virulent. You try to get it so that it can spread faster and that it's more deadly. Okay. Seems good so far, guys. This is even dishonest and he knows this.

Starting point is 00:12:35 I mean, it's not dishonest. It's selective. It's selective omission, really. Gain a function, as I think I have something up today that will show you this, is not necessarily, it's most commonly more dangerous, but it's not necessarily just about more dangerous. I think the reason he's only focusing on specific variations that make it more dangerous is because they carved out the dangerous gain of function. The issue is not necessarily about just dangerous because a point would be that there are things that they would do. They didn't claim these things were dangerous the last 20 years. The point would be that maybe they're doing things now they genuinely don't think are. It could be because you're playing God, you're manipulating these things that have side effects.

Starting point is 00:13:10 They don't foresee. That's the whole point. So when he says that they about making it more virulent, more dangerous, yes, that's part of it. But really, as you know, because you're watch the show and other people who care about making sure we understand these things, it's about gaining a function, as it very clearly says. There's loss of function too, which is in the same wheelhouse, by the way. Loss of function, they don't talk about, only because the argument is about it amounts to taking away something it can do. But you have to understand, we're still talking about manipulation that could end up with something that they didn't plan for. So it's not necessarily about the one thing that makes this more, you know,

Starting point is 00:13:43 pathogenic or makes it spread faster. Yes, but everything else too. And this is why it's important and understand that the very category of gain of function is dangerous and not even just gain a function, but the category of that type of science in any direction. And this is the reason, more than once, by the way, and what they're pretending now, the U.S. government has acted like they've tried, they said we recognize, I think it was 2014. It's dangerous. We can't allow it and then carried on doing it, which we can prove. This is what they're doing again. It's just a different variation, in my opinion. So making sure that's clear. I think there's a reason I'll start it over that he wanted to make sure he carved out just those things.

Starting point is 00:14:18 He's trying to misdirect about what the definition of these things actually means, because eventually, in my opinion, when it comes out, clearly, even though that's what we're doing now, but what I mean comes out, you know, when Tucker and Alex Jones talk about it when it comes out, ultimately they'll be like, well, that's what we say. It's not the one that makes it more dangerous. It's not the one that makes it spread faster. Thank you, Benny Johnson. Like, that's what will happen when that comes to pass.

Starting point is 00:14:40 That's what I'm guessing. Let's watch this again. make a pathogenic organism like a coronavirus and you try to make it more virulent you try to get it so that it can spread faster and that it's more deadly or just gaining any kind of function my opinion or losing one it's the same category and why would you do such a thing well either because you want to weaponize it or because they say that we want to develop a vaccine against future mutations, which is nonsense. Nothing. No good thing has ever come from gain of function. Okay. So did he carve out a specific kind? No, he just said gain of function. And I

Starting point is 00:15:22 agree with everything you just said outside of the original half story. So if when I show you, which you know already, that they are kill still doing it, then how do you reconcile that? It's that he's being dishonest. I mean, I'm trying to constantly be as objective as possible, but sometimes like with Trump and

Starting point is 00:15:38 Iran, you just got to be honest, guys. He's lying to you. Everybody knows that. And that's where we're at with this. Research. We've now adopted a system that is going to end it in our country, and we believe we'll end it around the world. Okay, now you could argue in this way he's playing with the words that he means that this direction will eventually end up

Starting point is 00:15:57 in the ending of all of this, but not yet. Not until we get past the few things we have to do. And maybe he means like that. What a reason I'm even including this is because that's what you might get for people trying to make sense looking back when we find out they lied. This is, no, he didn't lie. This is what he meant. that eventually will get there.

Starting point is 00:16:13 I'm just, we all know this is how politics is going right now or always has worked, but getting ahead of it will help people see that. But I'm going to go through the actual documents that make a very clear statement that they will continue to work on medical countermeasures under the umbrella of specific gain of function. What do you think? I mean, that is literally what he just let, what he just pointed to. Because any scientist, we will no longer support science in other countries that support it.

Starting point is 00:16:38 Now, that does seem to be what the statement says, but that's not the same as ending it here or with your allies. So you're talking about countries you don't like without proper oversight, which is what the document says. Your allies, it seems to be a different story with you as well. Any scientist that does these experiments will be punished and they can be permanently banned from any kind of grants. And the universities also will that support this research will also suffer liability. We've had too many bad things happen. Selectively, I'm sure, right? where ultimately it becomes, oh, well, this group that said the wrong thing about Palestine or whatever is the one we decide to call up for the thing that we allow others to do, just my opinion.

Starting point is 00:17:18 But at the end of the day, it seems to be working pretty well right now. This is good. And I think this is just, you know, the parameters we have to work with it now. But so, as I said before, though, to be very clear, I mean, this is a general point. Loss of function is not the same thing as gain of function, technically speaking. But as you understand it, you're manipulating this to change something. from its natural state to a different state. Right?

Starting point is 00:17:43 And so that's the point. And so there are unforeseen consequences, do your due diligence, whichever way you're talking about. And this is why the general category was, you know, what they put a moratorium, they say on it.

Starting point is 00:17:53 You know, and they lie, guys, the same thing we're dealing with now. So as I said, he's knowingly lying about this. And I referenced my two shows. Here they are again, if you want to watch them for yourself.

Starting point is 00:18:03 Now, this is from July 31st. This is just a regular and not like a calling it out kind of a thing, just a general overview of what we said, and then we'll go through the act, actual documents from HHS. This is White House issues sweeping new restrictions on high-risk life sciences research. So I saw this. I'm like, wait a minute, July 31st. Okay, this came out in May, right? Like, and this is what they're generally pointed. So this is where I came to find out,

Starting point is 00:18:26 oh, okay, they're actually talking about a different document that they just re-reissued on July 28th, called Trump administration releases new government-wide policy to end dangerous gain of function. Okay, so I'm thinking, like I was all, like when I was going through this, I'm like, well, then what was this supposed to be? This executive order talking about how they were going to end it. Okay, so what it amounts to is Trump signing executive order, which as we all should know by now, it's, it applies to the executive branch, which is a lot of what this pertains to. But it's not the way they like to make it sound like it's just now law. And everyone follows. So that's what people tend to pretend it's like.

Starting point is 00:19:00 Now this becomes HHS, health and human services, putting into policy, not just an executive order, the actual state. Now, what I find interesting about this is that what I was saying based on this document, which is less clear than what you're about to see from the new one, is exactly what they tell you now. And we got, as usual, so much pushback around the reality of this, just demonstrating our value as always that this is now what they're essentially admitting, and this is what we were telling you all the way back then. Now, this says on July 31st, referencing the new document.

Starting point is 00:19:30 On 28th of July, the White House, Department of State, and the Department of Health and Human services publicly released the one I just pointed to. Now it says under dangerous gain of function, the policy describes dangerous gain of function, specifically DGOF, not the same as, you know, the ones will point you in a second. It says, as research that, quote, enhances a property or properties of a biological agent in ways that make it more dangerous. That's how they describe it. But if you look up the definition, it simply is gaining a function. Doesn't have to necessarily by definition be a dangerous thing. They make the distinct. to make it about dangerous specific gain of function, which means if you're just a logical person

Starting point is 00:20:11 that there's a carve out for ones they deem not dangerous. But that's not the conversation isn't. That's not the clear part, by the way. The conversation is about ending it in general, which you just heard him gloat about. The policy also defines potential dangerous gain of function research specifically. And this goes back to the May document as well, as research with a biological agent that quote could potentially result in one or more of these outcomes. And it's all the stuff we know about increasing, you know, transmissibility, alter, you know, making it more dangerous, hurting more people. And so if it's under the definition of potentially dangerous that could lead to more

Starting point is 00:20:48 one of these outcomes, it says this research is permissible only after review and a recommendation to ensure it does not meet the definition of dangerous. You see, now what's crazy is I had so many people who I made even good intention that said, Brian, you're blowing out of proportion. They just meant the gain of function is dangerous. You know what? And you could have been right. But if you just look at it logically, it's clear that you don't need to add these extra

Starting point is 00:21:13 descriptors. It's about making a carve out. Always, at least in my experience is what I mean. Not that tomorrow will be that. But so far, in my work doing this, I mean, it's almost 10 for 10 or whatever. You know, it's consistent in my experience. So this is just their review of it, by the way. I'll go to their actual document.

Starting point is 00:21:30 But what they're saying simply is that they now have a. permissible version, which is the same on the May 5th document, where they will allow this if it's under review and a recommendation to ensure that it does not meet the dangerous definition that they've carved out for gain of function for a newly established independent third-party review body, the IT, PRB, which will consist of officials and subject matter experts across fields, including molecular biology, biosafety, biosafurity, cybersecurity, law enforcement, national security, ethics and public health policy, and which should complete standard reviews with 90-calder days of receiving material.

Starting point is 00:22:04 Oh, they have a whole streamlined setup, guys, which implies that there won't just be one occasional, but you're going to have people putting in reviews for gain of function that doesn't mean dangerous, which means gain of function research is not ending. Seems pretty simple to me, doesn't it? So why would he go on there saying, no more gain of function,

Starting point is 00:22:20 and we're going to end it around the world, except where you're allowed to send requests for us to, you know, again, I'm mixing the words up to be permissible and we're kept getting stuck on my mouth. but so continuing within 90 calendar days you'll receive the materials with the expedited review available within 30 days for the declared public health agricultural emergencies or matters of clinical national security oh great critical excuse me so now when you declare a pandemic you can go well now we can do it in 30 days cool i mean guys how do you not see how obvious this is and it's

Starting point is 00:22:52 exactly what people called out with bouchy i you know take the fifth but you know why because they're still doing the same things and ultimately trump is completely culpable for everything Fouc was involved in. Anybody without partisan blindness can tell that. It says the policy notes, policy is capitalized, it's the group, that the policy notes that the positive benefits of research that contributes to the development and approval of medical countermeasures. Those are vaccines, ladies and gentlemen,

Starting point is 00:23:21 and whatever new futuristic direction they have underneath that, should be weighed against the potential negative social consequences. Oh, so the benefits outweigh the risks. That sure came full, sir. didn't it? And the point, though, is that this is not some secondary category. This is right here under the category of specifically dangerous gain of function research. So what they're talking about is, and this is written in their documents, the policy note that the positive benefits of potentially dangerous gain of function, that they will then decide whether or not it falls

Starting point is 00:23:50 before or after and that we're still going to use that category for medical countermeasure using gain of function. Very, very, very obvious. I was going to go back to one thing here real quick. What was it? Yeah, I mean, I'm sure you guys got the point of that. So this is just their overview of it. Here is their document. Now, you can read through all of this, and it's exactly the same thing. I think one part stands out the most to reiterate the part that we were highlighting,

Starting point is 00:24:19 which is specifically the new policy prohibits federal support. By the way, I want to be clear about this. And this is, again, kind of like the car, this is my opinion, about the way they word these things. I've been right about these historically, but in many cases like the danger. part. It wasn't in my opinion. It was obvious what they were doing. In this case, though, this is my opinion, and I could be wrong about this, when they say the policy prohibits federal support, which by the way, lines up with all the documents. Doesn't that seem to carve out specifically? So what if it's Palantir? What if it's XAI? What if it's some other biological

Starting point is 00:24:52 extension from Elon Musk's cureback? That wouldn't be federal, would it? So they are, they're prohibiting federal funding. So you could even argue that means states could do it. You could argue that means that Elon Musk could fund them anyway or anybody else. You see how easy that is to sidestep. But anyway, support for, prohibits support for the dangerous gain of function research conducted within the United States and abroad. Establishes rigorous. This is even the same sentence. Establishes rigorous independent review for certain high-risk life sciences research. They just went out of their way to not say gain a function. But literally, the entire thing is focused on specifically, hell, oh, this was the wrong document.

Starting point is 00:25:32 It's right here. Yeah, the same thing. Dangerous, high-risk research. That's gained a function, right? So when they're talking about this same category and they simply blame it, call it as high-risk life science research, which is the same category.

Starting point is 00:25:47 They're just saying they have now rigorous, independent review for the certain ones that they decide are okay and restricts federal funding for research conducted in countries or institutions that lack appropriate bio safety, biosecurity and oversight. So not in general, like he said,

Starting point is 00:26:05 but only the ones they deem don't have proper gain of function systems. I mean, how does anybody not just running these people out of their positions? They're so blatantly honest, or excuse me, dishonest. This is from HHS. It's their very document. It's just like the COVID-19 shots.

Starting point is 00:26:22 All the screaming idiots on Twitter said, oh my God, they ended it. Even some that I don't think are stupid. They just fell for the going around, you know, the narrative. And in the document he posted on the third paragraph, it said some of these will continue. And I just, I don't get it. I mean, I do.

Starting point is 00:26:37 I think it's deliberate, but people fall for it. And then it goes at the same time, the policy preserves critical biomedical research, including the development of vaccines, therapeutics, diagnostics, and other medical countermeasures under strong safety and security safeguards. So it really breaks down to we'll stop people we don't think are good, which is whatever that means as you're the worst people in the world. and ultimately we are going to continue doing it with ones we think are okay, right? We don't do gain a function, but under our safety, security safeguards, and it'll all be okay. Well, that's exactly what you said for, Dietrich. It's exactly what you said every time we could point back.

Starting point is 00:27:14 Isn't that frustrating, guys? It is to me because of how freaking obvious it is. And again, you want to read through this from May 5th or just simply watch the show we get over? Because I read basically the whole thing. It's very clear that this was the point from the beginning. Now I'll also highlight John Fleetwood's substack from July 30th, says the new Trump admin policy permits gain a function experiment funding under new definition. Potential dangerous. So he saw it as well.

Starting point is 00:27:38 But I just want to pat our own back here and point out that we were breaking this down on May 5th, right? Or rather the May 9th and we did the show on it, which I think that was some foresight right there because they weren't making it as clear as they are now. Now it says the Trump administration, this is John's substack. Trump administration's newly released United States government policy for stopping high. risk life sciences research. That's the document we were just showing you, right? High risk life sciences research. Oh, that's the one I was going to point to it. I already have it open right here. Where was it right here? Yeah, that's the one I already have open. So the point was to show you that in this one, it seems they go out of their way. Getting mixed up here. This one. To say dangerous

Starting point is 00:28:16 high risk research, but don't make it life science research, right? And this one, they make it same point. Same general document. This one came out from the White House. You don't want to take your chest. This one was a couple days earlier, and it simply says stopping high-risk life sciences research. The reason that's important is because in the other document, they make it clear that certain life science research important to vaccines will continue. There you go. So they're just changing the terms, just like Fauci saying EPP research. We all knew he was lying. He was trying to sidestep the term because what do you think they're doing? It's just like everything else. The Trump administration sells you what you want to hear and then makes up a new narrative to keep doing what they've always been doing.

Starting point is 00:28:54 That's not unique to left or right or Trump or Biden, guys, it's just our government and they keep doing it. But guess what? The good note is, people are seeing it. I know you see it. People everywhere are paying attention. But he says, but the policy also creates a new category, potential dangerous candidate function that may still receive federal approval. Isn't that just the dumbest thing in the world? Like it's so blatantly dishonest and just a lazy side step.

Starting point is 00:29:21 And so I was going to highlight in this very document as well, the one that July 20th, 2026. It says right here, same thing. And there's more, all the stuff we just went over, but this is the standout about specifically allowing the type of work. It says the policy does not prohibit development of essential medical products, medical countermeasures, and protect against bioterrorism, biological weapons, nor does it prohibit international collaboration. I mean, this is literally talking about what do you think a medical countermeasure is

Starting point is 00:29:52 for a bioterrorism biological weapon? guys, that's a vaccine in their minds over and over. I mean, it's not like he's saying, here's our new countermeasure to a biological threat. He's claiming they do that and it's dangerous and we shouldn't do it anymore. But here in your own document from the White House, you cite that's exactly what you're going to keep doing. Now, you could argue that RFK, like I said, is somehow being misled.

Starting point is 00:30:11 I don't think, I think that's hard to reconcile with what we've been seeing. But you guys can decide for yourselves. Now, talking about Gaza for a minute and interestingly overlap, by the way, even, I mean, the medical field is more of a tangential step, even of the technocratic conversation. But we know how they're mixed. We see how these things lead to one another, right? And the way that, you know, internal biosurveillance, all of it is alarming medical pre-crime. Why I'm talking about it here is because we have to remember that Gaza is essentially, at least as it seems, to be the first sort of technocratic freedom city, whatever they're talking about. And they literally even listed in this

Starting point is 00:30:49 as being a technocratic city, which is not new. They've actually, she'd done that more than once. I just still find that pretty wild with what they know people are worried about. And in fact, I'll grab the Gaza article about that. One, really just because it shows the, in fact, this is more so about the people around it. Oh, no, we did talk about it, Gaza Freedom Cities and technocratic dystopia. It has the image behind it. You can see. This is their image for, I mean, I added the icons and stuff, but this is their, like, model for the Freedom City in Gaza. And don't forget, they're already telling you that no Palestinians are going to be allowed to stay. Everything.

Starting point is 00:31:27 People like us were telling you in the beginning is exactly where we are. And not because we were guessing, because we paid attention to what Israel's been doing our entire lives. And now everyone's starting to see it. Thank God. But the Board of Peace comes out and says this, as part of the process of decommissioning weapons in Gaza and enabling. And by the way, we just talked about this. And the point was before you didn't see the show was that Trump come out and said,

Starting point is 00:31:51 we made a deal and it's going to be peace in Gaza, even though he literally already said he made that piece, and that was one of the ten that he says he's already solved. This guy's such a clown. But ultimately, that now he put this deal out, and Israel came out and said, that's not what we agree to. And here, Trump's just going forward. Is that a boy?

Starting point is 00:32:07 Is Israel lying? Is this like Trump's new thing like Iran? I don't know. But it's really stupid. And it says, as part of the process of decommissioning weapons in Gaza, and enabling the transition to civilian governance, which ultimately means that even if they go in this direction, and it won't be that Palestinians have their own sovereignty.

Starting point is 00:32:24 It'll be a group that is given some authority, and then Israel dominates like they do right now, and it's not going to be any different. That's if they're allowed to stay, which I doubt is going to be the case. And creating a safer future in the region for both Israelis and Palestinians and Gaza. I mean, how embarrassing.

Starting point is 00:32:38 Same thing. How insulting. As you listen to what they're saying, the Board of Peace being stack of people like Tony Blair and Netanyahu. I mean, it's just a slap in the face, guys. And by the way, as this is happening, they're murdering people in Gaza, rape and torture and starvation.

Starting point is 00:32:53 It never stopped. And I'm not being hyperbolic, guys. Every day there's more stories coming out. A meeting was held earlier today, and this was on the third. It is today. Between high representatives, this is Nicolet, what is that, Maldonov, together with the Board of Peace. It's insulting.

Starting point is 00:33:13 They even have the nerve to call themselves the Board of Peace. And Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and his team, you know, like just a alone. It should just, they're laughing at you. And it says, the meeting was constructive and detailed. Israel and the Board of Peace share a common understanding of their ultimate objectives. I mean, it's just so unnerving. The fact that they just think, they know that nobody believes that. It's just crazy. The goal is clear and is not in question. The complete decommissioning of weapons in the strip and the transition away from the rule by the gun to the civilian governance as they rule by the gun and bombs, you know, but Israel doesn't agree to this. And so here is the Board of Peace and with Trump leading it,

Starting point is 00:33:48 claiming Israel's on board when they're going, we don't agree to this. In real time, it's insane. And it goes on to say, where was I lost my place? Where was it? Reaching it will be a process, it says, and that process will be set out in the next phase of the work. Contrary to inaccurate reports, it says, we note that the full withdrawal of the IDF beyond the yellow line, the L line itself being a violation of the ceasefire that the preemptus pretend hasn't been violated will take place only once decommissioning is complete.

Starting point is 00:34:18 So the yellow line, which they've moved, and it's now represents more than 70% of the Gaza area they control, even though the whole thing they claimed it was for is dictating what area they've kept, they've secured. But all they've done is use it to encroach and encroach and kill people on any side of it. And they're now using these concrete yellow bar. They're slowly taking it. That itself, as I showed you, was a violation of what they agreed to, not that, but also letting people go back to the places in the other side. And they were not. And also on top of just continuing to murder people, as if that's not enough to say you violated the ceasefire if you're Israel. But what the point is is saying once we do this, then that will happen.

Starting point is 00:34:55 He's just giving him excuses anyway. And this is as Hamas committed to the mediators. This applies to light weapons, heavy weapons, tunnels alike. Okay. Implementation will be overseen by the international stabilization force and by the implementation verification committee. So this is your new process, right? As countries get turned into their technocratic slaves, on which both the United States and the board of peace sit. remember Donald Trump has made himself, and this is not a joke, like Emperor King for

Starting point is 00:35:19 life, you can make up the term, he will be the leader of that forever. He made that the case, and it's not a secret. He didn't deny it. And also, he's making his tangential union security councils. You know, it's funny on now Jones can finally call him a globalist, even though it's been clear forever, reflect on how stupid that is from these people. Continued progress toward implementation in full depends on each side fulfilling its obligations. One more point on that, by the way, do you realize how many people around them and him included, if you would shout us down for making that point, for saying you don't see how this is all globalistic of what they're doing,

Starting point is 00:35:52 and now they start saying that, even though we got made fun of by those people, you just have to laugh at how embarrassing these people can be. Now, here's what I find very relevant. What I noticed, and what's funny is, you know, you can see it right there. They changed the post, right? So they edited this.

Starting point is 00:36:11 You want to see what they changed? You can already tell what I have highlighted. Oh, here, let me get it back to the right spot so you can see it. Look at that. So this is very, very revealing to me. So what you know, what you have is the original post. So board a piece, whoever's guiding that Trump's influence, I guarantee it, posted this. Then somebody said, whoa, we didn't guarantee a full withdrawal.

Starting point is 00:36:36 Take that out of there. And so they take the word full out. That's all they did. The only word they take out is full. So it goes from saying, we note that the full withdrawal of the IDF behind the L line will take place once they discum, okay, then it goes to, we know that the withdrawal of the IDF behind the line. Okay, now you may not find that relevant, but why would you remove it if it's not, like it's the fact that it was removed means that it's relevant. Because full withdrawal will to draw technically shouldn't mean anything different, but it did to somebody. So somebody recognized, okay, we are going to withdraw, but not entirely because that's what Israel's been doing the entire time.

Starting point is 00:37:11 my entire life. And they're just, and that's what the yellow line represents. They're going to pull back for, you know, whatever, no, if maybe not at all, in fact, but the argument would be that if they did withdraw, that it wouldn't be forever, wouldn't be entirely because that's what they've always done. He's giving them an out or whoever's doing this. Now, Israel conveys concerns to the U.S. about Hamas disarm a deal. Now, this is your super corporate actually quietly, or, you know, like we're pretend to be adversarial

Starting point is 00:37:39 against the power of the right, but ultimately support the agenda with Israel, kind of media. where they go, hey, they can convey concerns. Well, if you actually want to read what they said, it's that we don't agree with what that says. But just funny, Mr. Sausage, even the general partisan account says, Israel defies President Trump's peace plan and escalates attacks in Gaza, like we told you two days ago, by the way, which was they were still bombing in Gaza.

Starting point is 00:38:01 In fact, they targeted Hamas on the following day where Trump said the deal was going forward, showing you that they were going, well, we don't care what you have to say. We're not going to stop. And the whole thing Haas said was, well, we agree Trump, but it's contingent on Israel agreeing as well. Then the next day, Israel bombs Hamas, and Trump ignores it. So it shows you this isn't real.

Starting point is 00:38:20 Like in none of it, Trump wants to pretend like he's winning. It's what it feels like. Here is what on today, NPR says. Israel says it has serious concerns with the White House's Hamas disarmament deal. Now, it says, Billman told the Associated Press that Israel's intelligence assessment is that Hamas remains committed to rebuilding its military rather than genuinely demilitarizing. So the simple point to begin with is Israel's like, we don't believe them. We don't believe they want to do this.

Starting point is 00:38:46 So there's no deal, guys. Israel does not agree. They don't think it's happening and they're still bombing him. So it says, continuing, he said the Israeli military would not withdraw from Gaza. That's pretty easy to understand where it controls more than 60 percent. It's close to 70 percent before Hamas disarms. Okay, but what they're saying is before they disarm. They don't believe they're going to.

Starting point is 00:39:05 And they're already rebuilding their arms is what they're saying. So even if it's not true, what have we learned so far? far, that Israel will always go but tunnels, rockets, human shields, and just do and kill everybody they want. Because the world, the ones that have the power to stop them are either compromise or don't care. We have to understand that by now. But we're all fighting to change that. But just understand that this is a, this is only going to amount to more death and suffering if we pretend that Trump is actually fighting for something to give them peace. He is not. He wants, he's fighting for whatever gives him a win in a 30 second window is what it feels like. Now, it says Trump's 20 point

Starting point is 00:39:39 ceasefire plan, 20 point, calls for on the militant group to surrender its weapons and destroy its vast network of tunnels, which at the end of the day, if it hasn't already been clear, will amount to them just officially going after everything they can, which they're already doing, but it'll just make it easier. It also envisions Israeli forces withdrawing from Gaza, which, again, is not even on the table, as Israel's repeatedly stated. I mean, you have Ben Gavir, Smotrich, openly saying, like, look, we're taking this. We're taking Gaza.

Starting point is 00:40:05 We're in here. We're not leaving. And so when you have Trump saying this stuff, you just know he's either. that far out of the loop, which is alarming, or he's lying to you. And it says the arrival, again, is, is, it also envisions Israeli forces withdrawing from Gaza, the arrival of a new technocratic Palestinian government. But you realize as Israel, and even Trump's people have made clear, the Palestinians aren't involved in this. I mean, didn't Israel just ask them to, Spain, take him into Spain, Kavir asked. The bottom line is, it's a technocratic Palestinian government, and they're

Starting point is 00:40:36 only Palestinian because they're in the area they're calling ex-Palestine or whatever they're going to say. Technocratic means them. The expert leadership. That's what the technical leadership. That's what they're going to claim they are. I mean, how much you want to bet it's going to be the Board of Peace that they'll just take leadership just for a period of time, whatever their narrative will be. And yes, that's Netanyahu. And Tony Blair, Donald Trump, a copy of the agreement obtained and verified by AP said that all weapons held by Hamasra and police will be to the U.S.-back Palestinian Technocratic Committee. Oh, wait, okay, so wait, you're taking, so the Palestinians will be disarmed,

Starting point is 00:41:13 but then you're giving guns to the Palestinian, so it's not Palestinian. It's just, it's a cutout. They're calling a Palestinian Technocratic Committee. And it says they process to decommission and store heavy weapons and to dismantle military production sites and tunnels will begin after the arrival of the Palestinian Committee. And the development deployment of international forces. Whoa, okay.

Starting point is 00:41:34 So now you're saying international forces, which who knows what that represents, will be deployed into this area, which never, I mean, in the beginning of this, that was, no, that's not going to happen. We're not going to disrupt these people. We're not going to displace them. We're not going to ethically cleanse them. We don't want their territory. We just want to help them and save them from us.

Starting point is 00:41:49 Every single thing we told you was happening, including the idea, where was I, that you're an international deployment force, which will only amount to them taking occupying, it's already illegally occupied. So this is only going to make it even more difficult to pull away from this. And it's going to be in conjunction with a palestine. Palestinian technocratic committee, which is them. This is a very thin veneer of just them fully occupying the area. And it says the process will be linked to a phased Israeli would draw.

Starting point is 00:42:17 Oh, so a phased, which means we're going to take a few steps back, allow you to stop, and then we're going to pretend that you did something and never do any more steps every single time. Every single time. Look back through history. Saudi Arabia, Yemen, Israel, Palestine. It's always the same ploy. And here, again, I'm being hyperbolic when I say always, but I just mean it's very, In my experience, it's very common that they play this and just go,

Starting point is 00:42:40 they fire a rocket. No, we have to stay forever, which is what they keep doing. And even then, realize they have people that can easily pop up rockets from other groups and people inside of Gaza, which has been talked about and proven and written about forever. I mean, these are they have groups, even like the suicide bomber types. And in many cases are them carrying these things out to justify another act. It doesn't mean it's always that way, but that is a proven reality. The areas Israel controls in Gaza have been mostly disres.

Starting point is 00:43:06 destroyed and depopulated. Just a casual sentence in NPR about open genocide. Think about how crazy that is. The areas Israel controls in Gaza have been mostly destroyed and depopulated. That's it. Move along. Let's just casually acknowledge something we've been denying our entire NPR and every one of them have always gassoled us about the reality of what's going on.

Starting point is 00:43:28 And now you just include a sentence that literally says they just depopulated the entire area? That's a crime. NPR. Why don't you include that next time? Most of the territories, two million Palestinians are in the other part. You mean so ethnically cleansed and displaced, right? Where hundreds of thousands live in squalid tent camps and destroyed neighborhoods.

Starting point is 00:43:49 Let that live in infamy for the mean. You're willing to state that so clearly, but then you're going to undermine people's conversation of whether this is a genocide. And not saying that alone would meet the definition of your arbitrary means of what, like the idea of the defined lines for what is genocide, which matters to a degree. but what i mean i've said this from the very beginning you if you're uncomfortable with acknowledging the reality of obvious of genocide then call it war crimes you know for your your baby ears if it's too tough for you call it war crimes but if you're going to pretend that it's not war crimes then you're

Starting point is 00:44:19 obviously being dishonest as people stand to go tell me how it's genocide okay fine are you are you are you ignoring that they're raping and torturing and killing children okay then shut up because you're not involved let the adults speak you know like that's that's where these people are or they know it and try to lie to you about it israel appears of likely to pull back significant forces or make concessions ahead of October elections. Oh, right. Okay, so also we're going to casually acknowledge that it's never going to happen because Israel lies. Cool. While Spielman said Israel greatly appreciates Trump's commitments to its security and to finding a durable resolution, the government's position on disarmment is based on

Starting point is 00:44:53 detailed intelligence, saying that Hamas continues to rearm, like I just told you. So if they're doing that now, then what that means is you're not going to do these things until they disarm. So the point is they could very well be disarming. And Israel just goes, but they're not, though. So we're not going to do that until they do this. And create the very concept, the point I'm making where they can be sitting there unarmed, ready to go on the line, Trump read to sign it. And Israel goes, no, no, they're still got arms.

Starting point is 00:45:18 We don't believe it. Bomb them again. And what will the world say? Well, they refuse to disarm, even if it's not true. U.S. officials who brief report, and again, that's not some kind of like pro anything. The reality is that any group we're talking about, the history shows Israel and the U.S. conduct these type of tactics, you know, like feigning a peace talk and then murdering a religious leader, you know, casual stuff for them. U.S. officials who brief reporters on the disarmament

Starting point is 00:45:43 agreement last week said that Israel had been consulted at every step of the negotiations. Yeah, and what, excuse me, I just lost my place, had been consulted at every step of the negotiations and was not being asked to do anything more than what it had committed to as part of the ceasefire hostage release agreement signed last October. U.S. officials. It's unclear that exactly what exactly Israel conveyed to the White House. Two people with knowledge of the deal told AP that Israel had communicated its issues with Tony Blair, who by the way is also, again, part of the Board of Peace, which should make you laugh out loud.

Starting point is 00:46:16 One of them said that among the points Israel wanted was freedom to conduct military operations in Gaza. Think about how ridiculous that is. So you're talking about a deal to give them their own territory, but the one thing you want that makes this is that you want to be able to militarily do things in their territory. so then nothing changes. You understand what's happening? They spoke anonymously because they were not authorized to speak to the media,

Starting point is 00:46:40 or mean they'll get attacked by the group like Israel or Trump for pointing out the absurdity of all this. Since the ceasefire was signed in the last October, the ceasefire, Israel has continued striking Gaza, saying it's targeting Hamas and its infrastructure. See how lazy that is? You know, easily you can prove that's not true. Like if you were a real journalist, you would say,

Starting point is 00:47:00 but verified evidence can demonstrate how they've been bombing children. how they've been executing people and start you know down the line guys but no no but humas they say it's humas so we'll leave it there local gaza hospitals said at least 17 were killed in the latest israeli strikes including children but go on mpr tell us how they told us it was amos a strike on a residential apartment in southern gaza killed three family members including their four-year-old child according to this year hospital where the body's arrived even that you know the idea that we don't know this happened you realize we can literally prove these things are happening especially today But, you know, they told us.

Starting point is 00:47:33 And I mean, even that's better than it was before. But realize it's always like that with this kind of media. The Israeli military said the strikes of targeted militant operatives. Okay, NPR, did they? Because you can prove that right now. You know that, right? And even more so with places like Lebanon where they do the same thing. Well, Israel said they were targeting Hezbollah.

Starting point is 00:47:51 Okay. Where's the next sentence? But here's all the evidence that proved that wasn't true. They'll never, ever do that. Or at least they haven't in my experience. And just Pakistan today, Israel tells U.S. public Gaza plan does not reflect its position. That's from today. Netanyahu's office said the public version simply does not reflect what they believe.

Starting point is 00:48:11 That's so stupid to me. And that's where we are right now. That's the end point of this conversation as of today. Now, drop site news, since the ceasefire, alleged in Gaza was announced last October. Israeli forces have killed 1,233 Palestinians. They're not even denying this, by the way. They just say they're bombing Hamas. But you realize, even bombing Hamas,

Starting point is 00:48:33 I mean, specifically bombing Hamas, is a violation of your ceasefire. So how can you simultaneously have a ceasefire in place, but bomb the group that you are literally in a ceasefire with? Apparently, unless you're Israel, only when you're Israel. That's when that works. I'm not joking, guys, that's insane.

Starting point is 00:48:50 And that's where we are, because they're literally saying, but those are Hamas, but you have a ceasefire with Hamas. And over here, you just said the ceasefire is maintaining, but we're bombing Hamas. including 266 children, 133, 131 women, and 37 elderly.

Starting point is 00:49:05 Wounded, 476, including 101,135 children, 694 women. See, injured, wounded could mean missing a leg, guys, missing an arm. That's which is most common. And 175 elderly, according to the latest report. And it goes down the different breakdowns of these killings and attacks, you know, mid-middle-the-night raids and people's tents and home. I mean, it's just, it's, it's so unnerving. Death toll.

Starting point is 00:49:30 Children, women, and elderly account for 35.1%. 49.1% of the wounded. Almost 50% of those wounded, missing arms, legs, eyes, children, and women. There's nothing to compare to this. As somebody was pointing out recently, you want to compare that to Ukraine, which is another war we should care about, which we've talked about a lot, is what I think it was in the single digits. And there are people right now acting like what this one shouldn't matter. Like in fact, I wasn't even going to play it today, but a very embarrassing clip going around for Patrick Beck David where he was like, go Ukraine.

Starting point is 00:50:06 What about Ukraine? It should be America first. And, and Pierce Morgan just says, well, what about Israel? Is that the same thing? And it just, it bothers me even to give Pierce Morgan a positive note. But he's right. And David, it was like he was like caught off guard. Well, how much do we send Israel?

Starting point is 00:50:22 Almost as if he didn't even know that we send billions to Israel because Pierce kept going, billions. And he goes, oh, what do you mean? A billion? How much? Maybe this, maybe that. It was very hard to watch. So he just completely has a carve out for hypocrisy when it comes to Israel. Why do you think that is? And also, guys, if you're just going to be real, the guy doesn't know what he's talking about. You can see it in the way he delivers what he says, but I'll leave it there. There's so many of them. I mean, I posted that. I said there's so many frauds in the so-called new media. But this clearly matters. And it should matter to anybody with a con with, you know, a human, you know, who is a human? Now, here is a point.

Starting point is 00:50:56 a report that simply shows you what the not every Israeli or even every Jewish person, or I'd rather every Jew and even as every Israeli, which is actually the way to say that because there's less Israelis. The point, though, is that this is a real thing. And this is specifically highlighting Jewish supremacy within the Zionist, the Jewish Zionist conversation in Israel. And the point is that this is an undeniable out, like in my opinion, this is one of the most obvious examples of what we all see as supremacy.

Starting point is 00:51:22 Now, people love to make frames about other groups. It exists everywhere. Extremism, supremacy is you can find it in any category, guys. And quite frankly, every religion at some level is ultimately supremacist by saying that you go to heaven through this and nothing else. Right. So the point, though, is that some people take that too far. And some people believe that they're better than everybody else. And this is what's important to understand.

Starting point is 00:51:48 And it's not only about one thing or the other. In this case, we're talking about what's happening in. Israel and the Zionist supremacy that is bleeding and has bled into and almost completely taken over this current administration, it matters to see what they believe and what people will cover up for. Now, as always, for those that somehow don't understand that this is not some kind of a racial, I mean, we're talking about Heretz, by the way. But here is the Israeli human rights group, the leading Israeli human rights group in the world in 2021 that said, and this is what the title of the article is, the podcast, a regime of Jewish

Starting point is 00:52:21 supremacy from Jordan River to the Mediterranean Sea. Now, Zionism overlaps with Christianity. It overlaps with atheism. It overlaps with atheism. It overlaps with anything that's useful for it, quite frankly, if you understand the point. But what's important to understand is that it also overlaps with Judaism, which means Jewish supremacy, Christian supremacy, rather just simply understanding it Zionism supremacy, but through Judaism, through Christianity, whatever it is. And so in this case, and I know people disagree with that, but I wanted to highlight that for this context, because these are the so-called hilltop settlers, which are some of the most, like,

Starting point is 00:52:53 I don't even, like, you know, you could call them any number of names. Evil, sinister, vile, you know, malicious. It just doesn't do justice, guys. These people are, there's something just wrong here. And this is what we've covered a long time. Now, Ben-Gabir, largely, Smothertrij is well. I mean, these are, they, they stoke this.

Starting point is 00:53:10 And this is what they've used to kind of, you know, bottom line, this is what represents the most radical elements of what is the kind of prophetic religious, Zionism perspective. Now, Herat says it's no wonder Israelis want war, violence has become a source

Starting point is 00:53:24 of joy. This was published on August 1st, 2026. Just the main part that I think is important. It says, probably the clearest

Starting point is 00:53:34 manifestation of the ostensible joy of violent attacks or violence takes the form of what's referred to as happy Jews. And again, to be clear, the people saying this

Starting point is 00:53:47 are talking about their Judaism so it can't be taken as anything else. That's why it's important to realize that whatever we're talking about, including Zionism, supremacy within Judaism is a real part of that, which I've always said. The point here is that understanding that what we're seeing are people that call themselves happy Jews when what they're talking about is using that supremacy to attack people who they believe deserve it. It says in 2015, journalist Avica Novick and Chaim Levinson explained in their report, quote, the complete hilltop lexicon. And the main thing to understand is that the government of Israel absolutely supports this.

Starting point is 00:54:23 The IDF come out in force and support them with their own military force regularly. In their report, they hilltop lexicon that happy Jews are those, quote, who are not bound to the archaic conventions and rules of morality and carry out the price tag for talatory operations against Palestinians with a smile on their face. Tell me that doesn't ring true with what Miller is pushing. This idea that it might make's right, and it's not about laws and niceties. It's about who could take it from you.

Starting point is 00:54:52 That's what they believe. More recently, the term has come into wide use on settler sites, the Jewish voice in Hebrews, what the name is, Hacol Haida, which even styles itself is providing news for happy Jews, which means there are outlets like here in this country that lean in to that radical sentiment because it'll benefit them. And because it's clearly a growing, as Abby Martin's showing you over,

Starting point is 00:55:15 the years, unfortunately, the reality is the majority of the population supports this general direction, not maybe as all as extreme, but that is the truth, guys, supports the killing of Palestinians, supports the, you know, all the things we've seen. Now, that you could argue that's, you know, a majority can be 51%, it can be 90%, but it is clearly a majority. And that's been shown many times over the years. But I also stress that there's a lot of people, not the majority, clearly, but a lot of people in Israel who do not support this. Groups of Orthodox Jews that have huge followings that come out in protest of Zionism, in protest of what they're doing in Gaza. That has to matter.

Starting point is 00:55:49 Continuing, this group frames itself as news for happy Jews in WhatsApp and Telegram channels such as Hilltop News or the Struggle Channel. These groups have thousands of members who freely publish their content under their full name with their phone numbers and exude happiness. In some cases, the reports are firsthand. Quote, Happy Jews gave this car the full treatment. It was reminiscent to what's happening in this country.

Starting point is 00:56:14 as well. Hebrew labor, Hebrew labor you won't find anywhere else, in quotes, as was written with unabashed pride in reference to a violent assault, get this, against four women and a toddler from the Bedouin city of Rot.

Starting point is 00:56:29 That's what they're praising and laughing about. Who accidentally strayed into the settler outpost last year, and in some cases, indirectly, Arabs report that happy Jews burn the homes of Bedouin villages, we've seen all this. Invitations to carry out programs

Starting point is 00:56:47 are circulated on colorful, cheerful posters that look more like flyers for an open-air rave than calls to violence. It says, violence is transformed in the army. You know, other ones out there conducting all of the genocide in Lebanon,

Starting point is 00:57:03 Gaza, Syria, in the army from being viewed with ambivalence, ambivalence, excuse me, violence is transformed in the army from being viewed with ambivalence as indisputable, but also something to be ashamed of, but to something that is not only a tool or a goal in military activity,

Starting point is 00:57:20 but an organic aspect of the soldier's identity, hating and murdering Palestinians. This is done to them, guys. That's why, you know, that's why it's important to think about this. When you have new kids that are out there becoming IDF soldiers, realize that, you know, they're accountable for their actions. So too as anybody else, even if they're in a cult, but realize that there's a different way to understand that, you know,

Starting point is 00:57:41 these people may wake up in years looking back going, oh my God, like they were raised their entire lives being told these things. Now it's different today where you have people like us, internet, you know, there's ways to see that there are different paths. And I would argue at some level it is innate. That's my opinion. Like there are certain parts of us, but at the end of the day, you know, it's important to see that. There are people that you may not know what they're doing is as bad, you know, it's just, it's not that I would even, like my point is, if I see that, I'm going to criticize them. And I'm not going to go, oh, it's okay, you didn't know any better. That's not what I'm saying. But just as you, as a person,

Starting point is 00:58:11 person realize that there is another battle than just calling out the person doing it, realizing the institutional manipulation of the education of the children. Same in this country, guys. It's important just to help flavor the how and why of it all, right? But as I've always said, right, people are accountable for their actions, period. Now, I find this very relevant because this is the kind of thing that they're supporting. And it's very obvious in the world and the people like Pete Hegseth that they don't care, guys. And in fact, They support it too. Has to be understood.

Starting point is 00:58:45 Now, just one last point before we finish with Iran. Shadow Vezra shared this clip, and it's just, it's, you know, how, this, like everything else, it's just right in your face, guys. Here is an IDF general saying openly that they want to take control the battlefield using artificial intelligence so they can target or kill anyone on the planet instantly. He says what they did in Iran and Lebanon was just the beginning. And what they should watch out to what expect from Israel next. guys, I'm telling you, seeing it's not enough.

Starting point is 00:59:15 Everyone in the world seems to be coming to terms with what this is. But if we still just stand back and watch it, if we blink, if we give them that moment, I don't think it'll be another chance to stop this. And I'm never advocating for violence. My point is to try to take action to stop what is clearly developing around us. And it's not even just a technocratic control grid. It's the people who are out there part of it as well. So, you know, and it's not, again, it's bigger than even.

Starting point is 00:59:39 there's plenty of other things we can get into that go even beyond some kind of surveillance network. But realize what they're salivating about. And then realize the groups that are working with them like Palantir and Elon Musk and all of the leaders in artificial intelligence. Economy. Other than that, what do you think would be the next breakthrough that would fundamentally change Israel's battlefield advantage when it comes to defense tech, whether it be from the big primes or from the Israeli startups? it's all in there because if you will know how to connect the great intelligence that you have today that trace thousands of targets and by using an AI methods adjust those targets to an attacking cheap fast and rapid elements and manage to

Starting point is 01:00:41 control the battlefield in a way that you can operate it in in seconds we saw what israel managed to do in iran and in lebanon but that's something that we prepared more than decade the simultaneously attack that demolished the hezbollah years of preparation of missiles and rockets at launchers so i believe that this is the next phase and hopefully we'll see it sooner than leto I'll include, of course, the two different articles that are very relevant to this from 972 magazine, and there's plenty more than that, guys, especially those that relate to other places than Palestine and, I mean, anywhere Israel is currently killing people. You have to realize this is what's being built here too, and that's where the flock element

Starting point is 01:01:30 comes into play and everything else around it. But again, the articles, you know, this is called a mass assassination factory. And this is Palantir, working with Israel to commit genocide. Very clearly. This one was a secondary one, a follow-up. lavender the AI machine directing Israel's bombing spree in Gaza. One was more about like buildings and infrastructure. One was targeted to individual people.

Starting point is 01:01:50 The same stuff ice is using, by the way. Now, possibly tomorrow, most likely. That's my plan anyway. I want to get into the conversation of some. I saw a great video going around of a great speech of a guy I believe was in Minnesota speaking specifically about flock cameras. And I thought to myself, this is interesting. What a perfect intersection right here where you have this guy who just my feeling is he's a

Starting point is 01:02:10 Democrat because he's talking about how ICE came in and kidnapped their neighbors. And it's in Minnesota. And so I kind of feel like that's likely. I could be wrong. But my point is he's eloquently screaming about how flock cameras are bad. And I'm thinking, okay, for Republicans, most of them seem to be very adamant about flot cameras being wrong and bad, and we should stop them. But the question is, will you support him as you're both fighting the same problem if you

Starting point is 01:02:32 suddenly think he's a Democrat? Think it's worth reflecting on. And we'll get into that more. But the point was that we'll also realize that you're both fighting the same thing. Now, you may have convinced yourself that ICE isn't a problem, but you do seem to have an issue with them using flock to track people. If you suddenly don't have that issue when it happens to be a Democrat, well, then you're just a hypocrite.

Starting point is 01:02:50 But I think most of them are starting to see that there's a common thread here, guys, where whatever you, they're aiming, it's still an illegal surveillance network, a system that's being built around you. It's worth thinking about. And so that's where this relates to is this massive thing they're building. And it's happening to all of us, not just one side of the paradigm, guys.

Starting point is 01:03:09 Make sure I got those for you. All right. Read those if you haven't. It's important. Now, let's start with this. I've just one, well, two, but one specific mainstream. So again, show you kind of what they're reporting of this was, following up after the first main one,

Starting point is 01:03:22 and overlapping this with a few additional points. Now, I really will point back, this one, and both these, actually, this was the first one on August 1st, where we just discussed what, you know, most had seen going around about the points that stood out as, you know, questioning whether or not this was sort of engineered. This one, I thought, was even more specifically clear about when the evidence came out that Moroccan

Starting point is 01:03:42 intelligence agents were found among the migrants. You have New York Times telling you that there were people that were being told to go. I mean, guys, my main thing, aside from all that, which is enough, in my opinion, to show that it wasn't organic, not necessarily entirely one thing. But the main thing for me is you don't just get a massive surge all at once for no reason. Like there's been immigration. Like this specific point is very relevant for that because it's a close choke point. And people in historically have used this to try to go to Europe. The point, though, is that it's never, I'm going to get into the numbers in a second and show you that this surge is insane.

Starting point is 01:04:14 So it's not, it isn't just, it's not like everyone just decided one day. Now, you could argue it could be some kind of a social media thing. Maybe somebody started something and let's go, but we would have wind of that by now. In a mountain, they want to believe, it was just an organic thing. They just rushed in. So how do they all do it at the same time? Like, you know, it just, it's not, they're taking something that is generally happening and using it.

Starting point is 01:04:36 That is how this tends to work. That's my opinion. But the evidence is always one clue for you to go through. You know, this is Time Magazine report in 31st about this. Why thousands of Moroccan migrants crossed into the Spanish enclave, Suta. Spanish territory in northern Africa was left experiencing a humanitarian crisis on Friday after thousands of migrants swam across the border from Morocco, leaving 67 people dead. Spain's interior ministry on Friday said close to 50,000 migrants had rushed into Suta since Thursday morning.

Starting point is 01:05:06 More than 48,300 migrants had already returned. That's crazy. That's why I'm 50,000 people. We're talking, I mean, that's a very, that's a large increase for what had been generally happening. And on top of that, that 48,300 all just went right back. That's something clearly happened. That's why everybody picked, you know, pointed it out.

Starting point is 01:05:25 And why you get this kind of blanket response by all the media corporate that's like, that's false and fake and, you know, seemingly both sides in a lot of ways. But it says the Moroccan ambassador to Spain, Kremah bignac, said at an embassy event, that the situation in Suta was, quote, not wanted by the kingdom of Morocco, adding it would prefer legal, orderly, and safe migration. Of course, if they were involved, they wouldn't be like, yep, you got us, you know, as usual. But you could argue that it wasn't done directly from the highest, but I would argue my gut would tell me that this, as Morocco as I showed you in the previous show, which that was the title there.

Starting point is 01:06:03 Or really, there was Moroccan intelligence agents, but I guess not the title, but the point I went into was the decades long Israel connections to their intelligence. And I went over like seven different things going over a decade where Morocco and Israel had basically merged with their intelligence, with their military. Same thing happening in this country. And here's just one of them. Morocco and Israel will collaborate on military intelligence systems. And that was after multiple different collaborations and infiltrations.

Starting point is 01:06:27 But this point, or wait, what was I? Oh, yeah, yeah. So the point being about the Moroccan leadership, you should question whether or not that they have any agency at all, like we're seeing in the United States, quite frankly, but other places we know exist like that, where they've been regime changed, you know, like Syria now and other places like that, where they're not organic. They do not have agency. And so in this case, when they're saying we don't want that, you know, you have to question the different parts involved in that and whether they were told to, whether they didn't know what was happening around them. Either way, I think it's

Starting point is 01:06:58 pretty clear that there was something weird going on. It says, quote, to give you an idea of the scale, and this is in regard to Spain, it says, for the rest of Spain, This is equivalent to 2% of Suta's entire population. That's in regard to Spain. Now, it says it's like a million people entering Spain irregularly. You know, this like a per capita kind of thing. That doesn't, there's no way that just randomly popped off with nothing guiding it. Now, not necessarily meaning that proves that we know that somebody specifically did.

Starting point is 01:07:25 That's what I think. What it shows you is that even, like I said, some kind of viral social media post, you could argue might lead to something like this. But again, then that will be something that we would be seeing. Now, it says for Suta, there were 2,582 land arrivals, compared with 978 during the same period in 2025. That's an 164% increase. Again, same point. Now, it says Spain's Interior Ministry argued an earlier court ruling, I do think this plays a factor, is behind the latest influx,

Starting point is 01:07:56 stating, quote, it believes that human trafficking networks, but we know who's involved with that, are exploiting a court ruling to encourage the flow of. of undocumented migrants, mostly young people. Okay, so easily you could make the argument. This is some, you know, let's just pretend that that's exactly what it is. And you have a human trafficking network that took advantage of an opening. That would line up. I don't think that's what is the simple.

Starting point is 01:08:19 I don't think that is exactly the case, but just my opinion, my opinion, but you can argue that might make sense. But why I think it's relevant, one is you have the very clear Israel and, you know, infiltration into the depths of the Moroccan power structure. And then you also have the Epstein connections and different points. So my point, this could be just a way to argue that this is some, like the networks in place that they know exist were abused, not necessarily that it was some, you know, so what that would mean to me is that the people who usually abuse those trafficking networks like the people

Starting point is 01:08:52 were talking about ultimately use that network to facilitate this action. Just another way to look at it. Again, just an opinion. And so what that means to me, though, if you look at it that way, is that we're talking about the groups that are most, which I would be U.S. government, Israel, UK, you know, stand out. Now, that's just their regular coverage. Oh, and then BBC simply leaned in a little bit more to that. Just a few points to stand out to me.

Starting point is 01:09:17 Spain's prime minister blames traffickers after 60,000 migrants reached Suta from Morocco. Now, just a couple added points that says it's not good. This is what one of the Moroccan said going back. It's not good at all, and it's not fun either. I mean, people are dying here. He says, I beg you, please, if you haven't come yet, don't come, don't do it. Then why is a weird response?

Starting point is 01:09:35 That's multiple people that have done that. Why would that be the response? It's almost as if you were tricked into going and now you're trying to stop you from going, right? It says during the summer months, there is often a big push into Suta, typically organized over social media, right? But that's the point is this is unprecedented with the level with the time frame. So they're taking advantage, in my opinion, of something that has happened to a less degree in the past.

Starting point is 01:09:56 Sort of like we saw with Venezuela, the caravan, all the different things, guys. These are being manipulated. Not necessarily that everyone involved is part of something, but that just they're being, you know, manipulated. And it says, suit this president, one, Jesus, Vivas said the arrivals amounted to around 70% of the city's population, which sits at around 83,600, according to the latest local figures. That's just crazy, like thinking about per capita, you know, Spain's interior ministry told the BBC that its estimates were slightly lower, about 50,000. speaking on Friday during a visit to Suta, Sanchez said the surge was caused by criminal networks purposefully misinterpreting the recent Supreme Court ruling. What has emerged, quote, quote, from our talks with Moroccan authorities is that trafficking

Starting point is 01:10:44 mafias took a self-serving interpretation of a Supreme Court ruling which spread like wildfire. So simply, it ends up to get into the depths of it because I don't even sure that's exactly what happened, but openly, but essentially the point is that this ruling opened. in the door for them to argue that once people went and were like, let's say they were caught, like, in the water that they're not then a require, that they're, then they weren't legally allowed to send them back to Morocco, essentially. So the bottom line is that if they get them halfway there, that the people then have to stay there, whatever. And that's not ultimately happens. But they're arguing they misinterpreted it, thinking that they could then send them and get them over there,

Starting point is 01:11:20 but some kind of trafficking thing. It just doesn't ring true for me, guys. I mean, to me, it sounds like this is the cover for groups that utilize these networks. So, again, including these, this was the show from the first, just to give you a couple of the things that, well, this was actually Marjor Tilla Green's follow-up. Remember that Thomas Massey came out, and this is one of the documents we looked over in the first show. Two weeks before migrants from Morocco invaded Suta, the GOP passed a bill with $40 million for Morocco and a committee report advising Spanish administered cities. Specifically, Suta and Malia, the two that were, you know, people went into, are. are located in Moroccan territory and remain the subject of Morocco's longstanding claim. I mean, how do we, how is that?

Starting point is 01:12:07 It's just so, this is the kind of stuff they just want you to ignore because that's what conspiracy theory. No, that's just what a logical person would go, wow, that's pretty obvious. That doesn't, you wouldn't argue that proves they did it. But with everything put together, it seems very likely, Occam's Razor, that this is what's happening. And then he called it out. Now, here's what Marjorie Chilogne has to it. Republicans paid $40 million of your tax dollars to Morocco to invade Spain. So the fact that she's coming out so, like, you know, I don't believe that's what this proves,

Starting point is 01:12:36 but maybe she's got insight. I technically I get the feeling she's just doing what they do and kind of, you know, that's what we all think. And so they jump out with the statement of it. Or maybe she just thinks it. You know, I'm skeptical. You should be. And it goes, and they and then they all pretended like borders matter and clutch their pearls like invasions are offensive.

Starting point is 01:12:53 Right. I mean, that's the one thing to think about. Right. So we're over here going, we know the border. we mean, and they seems like to care about that, at least insofar as they can use it for their technocratic agenda, but then they violate the borders, everybody else. Well, you don't need this point to understand that. They do it in Iran. They do it in Syria. They do it literally everywhere. They're involved, guys. They don't care about anything they hold sacred for themselves.

Starting point is 01:13:13 Because frankly, I don't think they even hold it sacred for themselves. I think it's all about the immediate interest and the end point, you know, and just by the means that Trump would tell you. Republicans, Democrats are the same and the Unip Party has put us in $40 trillion debt, and America is last. Americans are last. Now, I agree. I'm going to probably talk more tomorrow or possibly tomorrow about the, you know, America party and what they're putting forward. Again, I did already talk about it, but I have some concerns. Also, as Dave DeCamp points out, you know, why oh, why is the GOP so pro-Moraco? Personally, I have a lot of respect for Dave, and I think it matters that he sees the same thing, it is to me, you know, that he sees the Israel-Moraco agreed, normalized relations,

Starting point is 01:13:54 you know, that U.S. is brokering the deal. And so clearly then, what Israel has an interest in would be this. And you already see that. Actually, I have a couple additional points to show. Go through this if you want to see the very clear connections of Israel over the years through Morocco. And this was just one of them. Here is another example to add to what we've already shown you of an Israeli rabbi saying that this will happen, saying this is coming.

Starting point is 01:14:23 Now, you could argue, of course, he just, you know, some of them will say he just predicted, predicted that Muslims will do what Muslims do. That's the kind of disgusting thing you get from people. The reality to me is that this is something that if you understand their prophetic view of the world, if you understand what they're, I mean, what Israelis as a government, as Israeli government has done around the world, whether it's fake. I mean, you know the infiltration, the manipulation of companies, supply chain. This is what they do, guys.

Starting point is 01:14:48 And so my argument would be that this is something they want to accomplish. And so they engineer what they want to achieve, especially if they have a reason to, which is Spain supports Palestine or whatever else you want to include. These are just thoughts. Who knows what the real outcome is? Maybe it's about energy and supply chain. But at the end of the day, he seems to know that. This is coming.

Starting point is 01:15:07 And you'll get what you deserve. I just find that relevant. The Spain won the soccer games now. They became world champion in soccer. And it's, of course, when they, you know, won and then danced on the Israeli flag. How dare they, right? So let's invade their country. He celebrated in Spain yesterday.

Starting point is 01:15:29 And today, how do they celebrate by walking over the Israeli flag? That's how anti-Semite they are. Yeah, yeah, right. So what's the equivalent of you guys doing that to American flags? Oh, it doesn't matter. Okay, got it. But I have news for all these anti-Semite Spanish Nazis. Very, very soon, the Arab woman of you in Spain.

Starting point is 01:15:56 Just a matter of time, 10 years, 20 years, 30 the most. not one Spanish will be able to stay in Spain. Look at that. As soon as they get the power, you're going to see Spain, what you see in Paris, stores are burning, riots on the street.

Starting point is 01:16:12 Yeah, yeah. And what you need to understand, at least in my opinion, is that is in part being driven by these people, not necessarily this rabbi, but the Israeli Zionist agenda. And these, the U.S.

Starting point is 01:16:23 Zionist agenda. I mean, they have to understand this, guys. And what's interesting about this is you can literally prove that Israel has been doing this and stoking.

Starting point is 01:16:30 I've talked about, weaponized migration for a long time. Well, what's interesting is you have Republicans who want to only see it through sort of a Soros open society lens. Well, yeah, that is part of this. But what's crazy is if you actually care to look, you'll find that that connects to Israel or both sides of the paradigm, not just George Soros, but the actual agenda. And there's different group like an Elon Musk type or the coax or anybody else.

Starting point is 01:16:53 And it's just wild how selective view people can choose to ignore such important factors. But, see, that's what the half part. That's what the paradigm does, is we can talk about certain things that are real, but then it gets overused or misplaced or just simply half the story. You know, again, as I keep telling you, I think people are seeing through it all. What's going to happen to every European country, England, Greece, Ireland, France, Holland, Germany, Spain, every one of them. Maybe somebody in the chat can educate the person who just jumped into, by the way,

Starting point is 01:17:29 who pretends that we don't say the word Jews, even though I think I've said it like six times today. It's just so funny how people, uneducated people, or just dishonest people, will try to over-focus. And this is what happens, guys. And who's to say whether that person knows that he's wrong or not? It was what I believe anyway. But they will try to make you think it's just the Jews,

Starting point is 01:17:46 which, by the way, is exactly what Zionists want from you. So might as well be a Zionist himself, and he doesn't even realize that. That's what's so sad about it, right? But, I mean, literally just went through the point about Jewish supremacy. But you know, it's just funny. But see, this is also what I keep laughing about is people that will jump into the chat,

Starting point is 01:18:01 the comments, and try to screen people away from the content by, for example, I laughingly pointed this out the other day. Somebody's like, do you really think you could vote your way out of this? I used to like your show. You're just gone now. I'm laughing. I'm like, my God, like at least if you want to try to shout people away from our content, at least understand the content.

Starting point is 01:18:20 Like, for anybody that's walked this show from the very first time, I have always been vote nobody. It just kills me. But that's what you get. You get people like that. Who, yeah, I agree, chat. Clown, right? People who don't know what they're talking about or try to think.

Starting point is 01:18:35 But at the end of the day, for all we know, he believes that. Maybe he's misguided. Hope he'll stick around. Maybe he'll learn something. But let's continue. This is, oh, and this was the other one as well. This is interesting. Now, this goes back.

Starting point is 01:18:48 It's not brand new. But then it also got a little check on it that this is from July 8th, which we should know. But this, of course, is funny to me since this account, which is trust in Trump, which is this is framed as like a positive thing. Trump is doing because obviously Spain is bad because that, you know, that's what this is. And so ultimately, they lie and pretend this is a just came out. It didn't. It was July 8, which is just how the partisan media, like many of the people we laugh about, continue to do this. Now, what's important, though, just as a tangential point is that Trump very much did state

Starting point is 01:19:17 that he was going to cut off trade with Spain, which appears to not happen the way he said it would, but doesn't that seem relevant? About a month ago exactly, he comes out and says that about something like this, you know, who knows? Maybe it's not going to be. connected, but I find it relevant, so let's play it. Mark, he's been a great Secretary General of NATO. I'm not happy with NATO because of what they did with Greenland, and I'm not happy with NATO because of the fact that they didn't want to help us with the number one state sponsor of terror, that's Iran.

Starting point is 01:19:49 They were unwilling to help us. Now, in all fairness, they didn't speak to Mark about it. I think if I did, it might have been different, but we didn't need help, but I was really testing. I wanted to see whether or not they'd be there. And the answer is, they were. I spoke to Germany. I spoke to France, spoke to UK, spoke to Italy. I spoke to, I didn't speak to Spain. Spain is a wasted

Starting point is 01:20:09 cause. We don't want to do any trade business with Spain anymore, by the way. I'd like you to cut it up. Spain is a terrible partner in NATO. They don't participate, they don't pay. I don't want anything to do with Spain. Cut off all trade with Spain, please, including visits. Okay, we don't want to do. Watch them come running back. Oh, they'll come running back. They treat this man terribly, and this man's a good man, too, great man. They're lucky they have them. But Spain doesn't agree to anything, and you shouldn't carry them. I mean, you sort of automatically carry it because you're protecting an area, so they're there. So they probably figured they have to protect us, right? But we don't have to. We don't have to trade with them. I don't want to do any more trade with them.

Starting point is 01:20:57 All right? Take it immediately. Don't even talk to them. they're hopeless. Yeah, which again, didn't happen, it seems. So it's all this, what does that mean to you? Does that mean that he ultimately is not really in control the policy? I mean, that's a very real thing we should consider right now. But who knows? Right.

Starting point is 01:21:14 I mean, I don't think, if it doesn't matter what we're talking about, Biden, Trump, it's the same point. We need to understand today that these people are not ultimately calling the shots, even if they believe that. And we can see that. I mean, that's my opinion, but we can see that in, I mean, take Iran for a focus, example, which we're going to continue to get into here. It's very clear that you can prove to yourself looking back. It's very clear. He is either being lied to or lying to you. And if the fact

Starting point is 01:21:41 that he continues doing it tells me that he's trapped. And who knows? Maybe he's starting to see it. Maybe he's realized he's being played. I don't know. But it's very clear, you know. And so the ultimate point here is this is all about blustering against Spain. The question is why? Well, if you time it and you look at what happened since, it's clearly, it's largely relevant to Israel. bad people because you know they they have everybody else going and paying and working in particular spain there are a couple of others but in particular spain they're open about it they're hostile about it and uh let's see a hustle they remain when they call up and they please please we want to trade with you sir we want to trade with you sir they make so much money with us and we're

Starting point is 01:22:28 going to see that they make a lot less i want no business heady person. Like it's just hard to digest. Like it's not, I just don't get why anybody who supports him is not, like, you can still be like, I like his policy. But come on, man, be a grown up. Like, don't be a child in the conversation. It's just, it makes us all embarrassed. And again, it's just as embarrassing as Biden not being able to tie his own shoes. You know, it's like this is, this is being done to us. And I really believe that. So I think the point is that there's clear precursors of Spain that make, you know, around it that are very important. Trump orders halt the U.S. trade to Spain over NATO, spending and run, but it didn't really

Starting point is 01:23:07 amount to that as it looks like. But this is what I wanted to add to it today, which again, is actually not even necessarily more to like who's responsible. But I just felt this, it just stood out to me as, I mean, it just brings true with the kind of other situations we're seeing in Israel with their own people, in fact. I mean, ask, for example, like I just said, ask the Orthodox Jews that are protesting Zionism how they're treated by the Jewish state, beat up in the streets because they protest Zionism as Orthodox Jews. That speaks for itself. But my point is in any of these locations, you know,

Starting point is 01:23:40 pretending you're fighting, you know, killing Christian populations anywhere that you're going in acting like you're fighting the evil Muslims in the world. You know, the end of the day, you have the Moroccan authorities who are supposed to be representing those people who are violently repressing them from coming back into Morocco. Not in every case, but in many that I've seen. This is weird.

Starting point is 01:23:58 Stone for those who return to Morocco. those who tried to go ashore were threatened with stones and expelled. That was one of the different articles. Here's a video of it, by the way, which you can literally see him doing. I don't understand this. Like, what is that? What's happening? You know what I mean?

Starting point is 01:24:13 Like, it's a very weird thing. And it's getting a lot of attention, but not, as far as I can tell, none in the West. Weird. Morocco migrants trying to repatriate from Suta, Spain's territory, North Africa, faced harsh intervention from the Morocco soldiers of the border. They threw stones and, rocks at the immigrants withdrew great reaction. I guess just not in the West. So shout out to pro macos, this is where I found it. Why isn't this image in every cover? He's right.

Starting point is 01:24:41 The act of Moroccan security forces throwing stones at people trying to return. Now, does that suggest, I mean, to me it simply suggests that they weren't supposed to come back or that they weren't allowed to come back. How do you make sense of that? I think it adds very much to the conversation we're having. Now lastly, again, just to show you that this is still going around. And this is a guy who's got 225,000 followers. Luke Radowski shared it, then deleted it. I just think it's interesting that this is what happens in this conversation on this platform, the promotion of the false information.

Starting point is 01:25:13 This has, what is it, 100, let's see what it is now. 150,000 views. The other one was a million something, right? Which, if you remember, the point is, this is an image that somebody just made. It's not even accurate because this didn't happen now. This happened back in 2020, where Donald Trump says that he recognizes a Moroccan sovereign over the Western Sahara, which is not Malia and Suta. It's more sort of north to the northwest.

Starting point is 01:25:39 So why does come out? Well, because somebody wanted to use it. They tricked somebody else. Maybe somebody tricked Luke for all we know. I don't know. I don't know where it started. But it's shared and not accurate because this actual statement is from 2020. Here's Donald Trump's recognition of that very place in 2020.

Starting point is 01:25:55 And then Israel did the same in 2023. Just to reiterate that. So this point is only about recognizing how many people are constantly trying to bog you down with fake and not even like fake, but like tangentially unimportant that's represented as current. Like, why do you think that is? It's either for clicks and reach, just a gain from lying on the platform that allows you, that promotes lying, or to lead you astray from the main point.

Starting point is 01:26:21 I think it's the latter, quite frankly. And I'm not saying this person's choosing to do that, but this just ends up happening people share it without doing their due diligence, which is also the point that has to matter. But I think that it's, you know, it's looking. up it's going around still. Now, this is one of those other posts, Sertavich is trying to gaslight around this. He goes, the Israelis are being stupid. Optics make it look like they're planning the invasion of Spain. I get the joke, but never make propagandist against yourself. Now, he posts it's more than once. He posted underneath somebody else, like literally calling out the invasion of Spain.

Starting point is 01:26:51 It's kind of like a Patrick Beck David, Patrick Bet David moment, really. But Ania says, decades of Israelis lying are crumbling in real time, or Israeli lies. For years, we've been told Israel is fighting them over there, right? Muslims over there so that we don't have to fight them over here. That's the foundation of the Israeli security relationship with the West. Now, at least in one example and plenty of others, we could see if we choose to look, we see that Israel will in fact gladly coordinate with the Muslim allies, the Moroccan Kingdom, to flood the West with migrants just to prove a point and settle a centuries-long rivalry with Spain. It's important, guys, because this is the reality of this. As even somebody mentions in the chat, what is it called,

Starting point is 01:27:30 the clergy plan or really the replacement theory concept. It's something that is very real in a general sense about people trying to do this, largely from a Zionist perspective about the prophecy of the West collapsing before the brings on the end times. So what's interesting is that becomes something that is used against the Democrats, against Muslims, when in reality it ties back to something very different. But what's interesting to me is that what we're seeing here is the example of ISIS. Like not the same Morocco. My point is that Israel, will work with the very people that they claim their fighting. And in many cases, lead the groups.

Starting point is 01:28:06 That's what Ohamma bin Solomon admitted about the different groups around them. The ISIS, Al-Qaeda, Hauteu, Sharm, that ultimately they were one, led by people who didn't really believe the ideology, but led people to believe they did, but then ultimately that they lost control of the leading elements. Those are statements he's made more than once. Or another one he's made, by the way, is that I hope that Yemeni people, the Yemeni children were shivered when they hear the name, O'Havim and Solomon. So he can continue killing children so he hopes they can shiver when they hear his name.

Starting point is 01:28:34 That's a real quote, by the way. Anyway, the point being that this all leads back to a very real manipulated situation where we have people who have a literal prophetic end times view of exactly the situation and necessitating the fall of the West in this exact way. In fact, yeah, so this is perfect. I didn't even start Iran yet. Let me play this clip really quickly. I believe I still have it.

Starting point is 01:29:06 Let me see if I could find it really quickly. Let's see. It was, oh, man, that's frustrating. It was a clip that Adam Green put together, a compilation simply showing, and it doesn't necessarily, not necessarily people in the government, but prominent rabbis who were just outlining exactly that. I don't remember what I had it under, though.

Starting point is 01:29:35 Oh, well, damn it. Hmm. Oh, well, well, it's important, because I think the point is that there's a very real belief from a religious perspective or just argue both, but also Zionists, which I don't think is the same thing, that this is what needs to happen, but realize that you have people like Pete Hegesat, who told the U.S. military, repeatedly admitted by others that this was Armageddon, fighting the religious war, and he believes the same thing,

Starting point is 01:30:00 or maybe a different Christian version where it's the reverse. But either way, guys, realize that they know that these Israeli Zionists believe that the West has to collapse to bring, and they're fighting for that agenda? How in the world is that America first? Insane. but I agree. So if I find that, I'll try to play it, but let's finish or let's end with an update on Iran, which I do think is very important, not necessarily important in the sense of everything

Starting point is 01:30:25 else, but just what this continues to reveal. And I mean, you can come, whatever you think, even at the end of the point, I guess the point is you don't know what this shows us. That's what's so confusing about it is. Is he lying? Is he being lied to? Does he even know what's going on? Is he senile?

Starting point is 01:30:41 Is Israel? It's just crazy. This weird cycle. In fact, I'll even start with this. I'll read it again because it's just hilarious to me. Where was that? Godfrey. Godfroy says, Trump's waffling on Iran has to be a glitch in the matrix.

Starting point is 01:30:58 It's so absurd, it doesn't feel real. Like the worst version of Groundhog Day on loop. It's just hilarious. Redundantly perfectly hilarious. Like, it's exactly the point, right? It's like Groundhog Day on Loop is perfect. And it just, it's, it does make sense. I've been saying it the entire time.

Starting point is 01:31:13 I mean, it ultimately might. at the end of the day, like if he just doesn't have any other options, and so that's the best he can do, that makes sense. But with limited information, it just doesn't line up. And it's so absurd. Most people don't even realize this is actually happening every couple of days, that they're standing back thinking it's just that same conversation being recycled.

Starting point is 01:31:31 No, he's literally doing this same weird dance over and over. And you can prove that he was lying when you go through it. It's just crazy to me. So, yet again. And so to start with this, it's just hilarious to me. So if you watch yesterday's show where we went through this from yesterday and the day before, it was very clear that what was happening, as usual, was that Trump lied about what was going on and Iran was like, we're not even dealing with you right now.

Starting point is 01:31:56 We're talking to Amman. You're not included in this. We're not negotiating with you right now. And then this is what Jesse Waters put out. That is with all the information we proved, Jesse Waters comes out with this. And that's what I said, for those who watched the show last night, you'll get a kick out of this. The leader of the red light, holy crap guys. comes called off strikes in iran at the last second and has announced all parties have agreed to final

Starting point is 01:32:21 points of a deal okay okay just so you know as up today everyone knows that's not true it's just like every time and jesse waters just shamelessly repeats what the team says and very smugly always like turns out we won again you know it's like it's like what over and over and over he'll do it again tomorrow it And they somehow grow in reach in a false AI controlled world that we live in. But that's embarrassing. We just made a great settlement of the war with Iran. They want again. We're going to be subject to finalization of documents.

Starting point is 01:32:59 We should get done over the next few days. We probably have a signing maybe in Europe. Trump told the post a deal is pretty much wrapped up. And top brass in Iran have approved a draft agreement. Oh, yeah. all the MOU. They signed it already. Anything else? Not true. Terms extend the ceasefire, immediately reopen the straight, and in 60 days, Iran has to downgrade their uranium to zero. Okay, so what's funny about this? That's what they want,

Starting point is 01:33:26 very clearly, just an extension, essentially, at least the first part of it. Extrity, extend the ceasefire. Now, it's very possible that that may end up being somewhat of what happens within Iran and Oman. What I believe he's doing is very desperately trying to just yell out things around what they're doing and that part of it happens, they can just see it'll make Trump look like he's right. But realize Iran, I don't believe it's even in the cars that they're going to go in the direction of the nuclear talks anymore because they don't have to. And the same thing with the straight, they're in control as everyone can see. And even though Trump keeps lying around it all, I'm in control and we can do this. Well, nope, it's very clear that Iran is control.

Starting point is 01:34:02 Guys, if you haven't looked, look, it's very clear. And then on top of that, that they are arguably going to dictate some kind of toll dynamic. And that is what they're currently discussing with Oman, on the record. But Jesse Waters, we'll break it down for you. We don't lift the blockade until the uranium's vaporized. And we don't unfreeze any of their money until they behave. For weeks, we haven't heard of. Oh, you got, though, their money. Funny how that became the reality once Trump needed to be the reality. Or before it was, they paid Obama paid them all this money and Biden gave the money. Well, it's, Same thing. It was money they seized as I've been telling you my entire life.

Starting point is 01:34:43 So, but funny that Trump just gives them the go ahead. Oh, no, now we'll tell you it's money that's ours or that's theirs, even though that contradicts what we've been saying the entire time without blinking. Corporate media. Keep from the gay Ayatollah, but the gay now he's coming out. You realize that's for all we know, who knows, it's possible. But do you realize where dumb points like that come from? Something that they push out there from the State Department propaganda from what Trump said. Some narrative they used, they thought was going to influence the conversation. There's nothing to that.

Starting point is 01:35:14 And who knows? Maybe. Like I said, I don't know. And neither do they. The bottom line is, this is what you get from Fox News. Tucker Cotarlson and the idiots out there who act like that is what you should be doing, calling him the Democrats like we're in kindergarten. Has the Supreme Leader approved this deal, sir?

Starting point is 01:35:32 I understand the answer is yes. The last student. I understand the answer is yes. So you know what he does that for? So he can always blame somebody else. Well, I was told that somebody was relayed to me. If I was there, we would have gotten it done. Knights have really gotten the Iranians' attention.

Starting point is 01:35:50 The USS Michael Murphy launched dozens of Tomahawk missiles, hitting Iranian surveillance, communication systems, and air defenses along the southern coastline. Yeah, I can't verify what they actually hit and neither can they. And the bottom line is, well, I mean, in regard to probably Jesse Waters, the point is that the U.S. right now seems to be spinning out. bombing. If you understand what Iran did before all of this, which you can go back and look at our coverage, look at Robert was saying, well before we got here, including putting all of their

Starting point is 01:36:17 ships, a lot of their naval ships in canals under the mountain so they wouldn't be bombed, which is now why they still have a Navy, which you can prove, by the way, since they're still in control of the straight, the point is they prepared for all of this. That's why they out, they decentralized, what they did was planning for all of this. So what they get is the U.S. bombing, what they think they know where they, and they're not successful. over and over, which is being relayed by people who know what they're talking about, and people that are actually inside the conversation and leaked information. Then you get Iran almost, and it's getting worse every day,

Starting point is 01:36:50 where you're seeing them respond and bombing and not having any deterrence, having drones flying freely over U.S. basis. Guys, it's pretty damn clear that they're either letting all this happen for some unknown outcome or they have completely, you know, they're out of what they need. They are completely depleted, was the word I'm looking for. But I'm not going to pretend to know for sure. But the evidence speaks for itself. But Jesse Waters will just read off what the State Department wrote.

Starting point is 01:37:16 You know, he's the guy, he's fighting the deep state while reading what the deep state tells him to say about how the D state operates in the deep state. These were the most ferocious and devastating airstrikes since we ended major combat operations in April. Tonight was going to be even worse. It was. We were hitting them very hard for the last three days. We're going to hit them even harder tonight. They knew that we told them.

Starting point is 01:37:36 What end? What are we talking about here? Didn't you say you won 40 times already? What are you hitting him for? If you won, take it. If you have to bomb them, then you didn't win. I mean, this, but I don't need to tell you this. But this is how, like, objectively stupid this is,

Starting point is 01:37:50 that a child can see that his narrative here and his narrative there don't reconcile. And yet he just keeps going. You realize his own people laugh at him for this. They have to. Or at least they're embarrassed because they don't want to laugh about it. Everybody can see that. Exactly what we were going to do. We explained it exactly because they have.

Starting point is 01:38:09 They had no Navy. They had no Air Force. They had no. I mean, how can you even say that? When you can clearly see that if you want to pretend they're not control on the straight, you can see that they're acting in the straight. And they're not speedboats and drones. Guys, they are clearly capable.

Starting point is 01:38:24 Otherwise, this wouldn't be happening. And yet they just keep lying. I mean, there is no better word than desperate. I've been saying that since the beginning because it's been pretty clear to me. Any weapons of detection, they had nothing. And so we could tell them exactly what there wasn't a thing. Okay, so nothing is what hit those bases, right? Nothing is what hit Kuwait.

Starting point is 01:38:41 Nothing is what's been flying over your bases without being stopped. I think they could have done about it. It wasn't just these airstrikes to put the pressure on. The president warned Iran, he would just keep bombing them every night until they side. Yeah, because that's just normal. We're going to keep killing people, no big deal. It's the case like in junior high. I just can't even take it anymore.

Starting point is 01:38:58 The point is it goes on like that forever and just repeats what Trump said is absolute smug certainty. I don't even, I genuinely don't understand why even people that support Trump, somebody like that. Well, I do because it just gives you shameless high-fiving some media coverage about, well, we're so great and Trump's the best, and we're going to win. It's all going your way, even though none of it's true. And you can see that in real time. But I guess people like being lied to, you know, that is the reality where we are. Now, what's funny is, oh, well, the Patriotic Blonde simply says, who used to support Trump. Meanwhile, the Trump announces the war has been won,

Starting point is 01:39:31 again for the 234th time. Because he does. We basically says, you know, we won. Not we won, but sort of we had the major success and now it's kind of, I forget the exact verbiage. You just heard it. It was that, you know, we basically now are beyond, you know, the way he framed it was, this was essentially the hill that they've gone over. Now, as Patrick says, Trump has no cards. I agree. Now, this is Hormuz report saying a source close to Iran's top negotiator on the second,

Starting point is 01:39:58 says Tehran viewed the latest U.S. threats as simply pressure tactics to force Iran to negotiate. They didn't cave. But there are no rough to talk. believing time is on its side and that Donald Trump has no strategic cards left to play. I agree. Now, they outline the vulnerabilities. It's their opinion, but it's all the stuff we talk about.

Starting point is 01:40:17 The petroleum reserve, missile defense, political pressure, it's all the stuff that we can see. And they're floundering. Hormuz's letter also reports, and this isn't confirmed, but this is, this was going around as reports. And even the U.S. states arguably that they were bombed. But when you look at it, it turns out that the reports largely are that they were deterring a U.S. ship. and then it landed in the water. But it was that Iran has launched an anti-ship cruise missile toward basically in the strait,

Starting point is 01:40:44 and the reports were a U.S. back tanker, essentially. And so this is what we see in the past, where that becomes they're bombing ships when the reality is you're taking the route that is not allowed. Even if you didn't give them the authority, it is what it is right now. And so you're choosing to go a route where you know they're going to do that

Starting point is 01:41:01 when you could just take the route, so you're choosing to make it an issue so you can argue their bombing ships, when in reality, they weren't bombing ships. They were bombing the water to threaten you back from doing it. That's what happened last time as well, by the way. Not there was, anyway, specifically in the general sense, there's been examples of them bombing ships, yes.

Starting point is 01:41:18 And that's always been in a context where there is not an ongoing agreement and that they're continually being, like when they're bombing them in Iran while claiming you're violating their memorandum. Now, here's what Trump had to say. And this is where it gets really silly, guys. This is at the end of yesterday. So you already know this since we reported it. and we already basically predicted exactly where this was going to go.

Starting point is 01:41:38 But here's what he said, telling you that today, afternoon, which right now, it's past that point that they're going to negotiate. We're going to begin negotiating again tomorrow. As far as I can tell, that's not happening. Let me know if you're getting a note about that happening immediately today right now. Last I checked an hour ago or half ago, Iran was publicly going, this is crazy. We're not speaking to them. There is no negotiations right now with the United States. there is with Oman, not really in negotiation, but working out a deal of control of the strait.

Starting point is 01:42:08 That is going on right now. But here's what Trump had to say yesterday. Case you didn't hear it, we played that earlier, but it's the second part that I want to get to. But he says, and this is what I think is actually accurate. We were asked by Saudi Arabia, Qatar. So basically, Iran and Oman are working on figuring this out for their control of the straight. And everyone seems to be okay with that except people that are afraid to look like they lost. And I shouldn't say okay with it, but willing to accept it because we want to be done with this.

Starting point is 01:42:45 And so Saudi Arabia reaches out to the maniacs and says, just stop. Just hold on for a minute. Let this work itself out. Right. That's what I think happened. And that's because this is hurting. This is immediately, not just the bombs, but I mean, the straits hurting a lot of different people.

Starting point is 01:43:00 But that is having a serious effect on Saudi Arabia. They've got an oil infrastructure, a ramco bomb. They're not able to, I mean, it's in addition to that in general. It's just hurting their economy, but same with a lot of these countries. And so the point is that I think. in my opinion, they simply said, just stay out of it. And so then Trump says Iran asked two. And I think he knows that's not true.

Starting point is 01:43:24 But it's possible that Saudi Arabia said, hey, Iran asked us and played Trump to get him to back down. Any of those make sense to me, frankly, because I think that they're literally being laughed at. But my gut would tell me if I depict that it was simply Trump, just like he's done 70 times already, saying Iran reached out and said they want to make a deal. And that's not what happened. We're all set to go at this time right now, and it would have been a massive attack. We're all set to go.

Starting point is 01:43:54 But when the allies ask to fall it off, you got to sort of say, well. So right there, he seems to admit by accident that it was the allies, but not Iran. Because he didn't say allies and Iran right there. He said when the allies asked. And if you listen to the first part again, it feels like he chooses to include Iran after a second of thinking about it. And by Iran. We were all set to go. Just about at this time right now.

Starting point is 01:44:22 And it would have been a massive attack. We're all set to go. But when the allies ask to call it off, you got to sort of say, well, let's see. And the reason they ask is that. You got to sort of say, well, let's see. It's like he can't even commit to his own stance. It's just so strange.

Starting point is 01:44:45 there's a deal there's a deal on hormos and then it will be a deal on the nuclear or you deal on hormos in case you're paying it the denuclearization of Iran what was that what was the name you made up for it Trumpization of Iran and it will be a deal on the nuclear or you might call it the denuclearization of Iran I call it the denuclearization of Iran you call it what it's called very cool very smart of you you know I also call with a table That's magic. I'm the one that made up that's a table. I work on a table.

Starting point is 01:45:18 That's what I invented. You know what I mean? Like, what is wrong with this guy? The denuclearization of Ron is literally what you would call a group being denuclearized because it's the, it's your only one word for it. I call it that. I'm the one. It's like a tick. It's like an impulse for this person.

Starting point is 01:45:33 And it's worth calling out because it speaks. I mean, think about how alarming it is that that's the kind of nature this person has. And he's that leader ostensibly of this country. What you say? Can do it? time we want but uh right right so i can bomb whenever so let's make a deal but i could bomb whenever i want you know it's it this is it's the same that's why iran doesn't take this seriously because even when they actually go no no we're making a deal they murder their religious leader they bomb their negotiation

Starting point is 01:46:04 team so even when they really do have statements that make it seem like they want to they're planning to kill people so now when he goes well maybe maybe not well never mind you know it's not even worth getting into, you know, this is everyone that's dealt, excuse me, with, I mean, the U.S. government in my experience, in my living memory, but especially last few administrations, like especially 9-11 forward to be more clear. But again, it's really just the history of this government, guys. We're asked by the three primary groups. We're also asked by Iran, very strongly, actually. They said very strongly. They really, really, really asked. They begged me. He doesn't

Starting point is 01:46:45 every time. like to make a deal now. You know, I don't know what they say because a lot of times they'll say that to me and then they'll go out and say, we don't know what he's talking. Ah, okay. Now, I brought this up before.

Starting point is 01:46:54 I mean, that's one of the possibilities, isn't it? But my question is always, if that is the case, why does he keep believing them? You see, like, I mean, maybe one, two, three, four, five, six, maybe seven times.

Starting point is 01:47:06 15, 20, you're going to just keep going around, and said, we're going to make a deal. And then yell it out loud for them to go, look at this clown. He bought it again. That could be. I mean, look at what they've gone through. Like, they don't see them as an honest partner.

Starting point is 01:47:19 Guys, they're not an honest actor in this. They've proven that. So why would they treat them as an honest actor? That just seems logical to me. But again, who knows? He could be making that up too, guys. But just think about the possibilities. And either way, he's either being lied to or lying to you and just weirdly continuing

Starting point is 01:47:36 the cycle. Obviously, they don't want to be attacked. And they knew the extent of the attack because they saw it for me. So you could argue that his own hubris and this weird, like really incorrect belief of the supremacy of this power allows him to, well, that we know they don't want to be attacked. Well, guess what, guys? I mean, nobody wants to be attacked, but they've prepared for this. They're not where they've proven more than anything since April, February that they are not afraid of these attacks. They don't want them to happen because it's going to damn.

Starting point is 01:48:08 It's going to kill civilians. It's going to kill their infrastructure. They're going to lose money. But they prepared for this. They've been telling the world that prepared for this. They've been telling the world that prepared for this. Like I said before, before February 28, they went to the UN and said they're going to bomb us. And if they do, this is what we're going to do.

Starting point is 01:48:21 They knew it. So they're not afraid to be bombed. Pretty simple. They don't want it, clearly. I don't think anybody would. But ultimately, it's clear that they're prepared for this. So if he believes that that's all it takes, a threat of our power. And that's really how he sees himself.

Starting point is 01:48:36 Maybe he is in his own weird hamster wheel of, you know, he's lying to himself, if you will. I can't tell. We're talking to them in the form of a negotiation. It begins tomorrow afternoon. Suppose to what? And we'll see you, but sure. I'd love to do that and save a lot of lives. Oh, yeah.

Starting point is 01:48:57 Right. It'll stop me from killing children tomorrow. It'll be great. Unnecessary power, to be honest with you. It'll take many, many years to ever build it back. If it could them in the form of a negotiation, it begins tomorrow afternoon. And we'll see you, but sure. I'd love to do that, save a lot of lives, save a lot of,

Starting point is 01:49:16 A lot of unnecessary power, to be honest with you. You'll save a lot of unnecessary power. That's what he said. I'm just trying to piece that together. It would take many, many years to ever build it back. I don't think it would be even buildable back. Maybe he meant that by stopping you won't lose that power. I think that's kind of what that meant, I think.

Starting point is 01:49:36 So we had an attack that would be the biggest attack since World War II. That's what everybody jumps on. It's okay, but it didn't happen. So what are you saying? Trump was said, it would have been the worst. This guy's been blustering his entire life. Like, it's such a weird thing people to focus on. And really, who focused on it were the ones who wanted to go, we're the best.

Starting point is 01:49:55 It would have been so bad. And Iran was so scared. The Nick Sorders and Benny Johnson's and, and Jesse Waters, literally what you got from these people. And then 20 seconds after that, frankly, before it, you already knew he was lying, but they still went with it. Disasters were never. And they didn't want us to do it.

Starting point is 01:50:17 Well, I mean, ask yourself this. How would it have been in? disastrous for them. Another bombing campaign. You've done plenty of them. Why would this one be different? Are you saying that you've chosen not to bomb places that would have made a disaster until now? You see my point, guys? Deductive logic is their worst enemy because they just ramble and don't think people can smart piece together the obvious inconsistencies. Had a recognition. It's obvious. And frankly, Saudi Arabia didn't want it either. They thought that idealists. 10 minutes.

Starting point is 01:50:50 Yeah, Saudi Arabia knows they're suffering. All of these countries are suffering because of you and Israel, and you're not even protecting them. That's the whole point of all this. And so that's why they're not going along with it. They're slowly making their own things happen, guys, because you're not going to sit back and just be a battering ram to defend what, you know, that's what's happening.

Starting point is 01:51:09 Because every time, as I've been pointing out, even though they have a legal justification to return bombing in the United States because the United States is bombing in Iran, thank God they haven't fallen. that level, they're just turning around and bombing bases elsewhere. I just always think that's relevant. The group that they want you to believe is frothing at the mouth to murder you for your beliefs chooses not to bomb when they have the legal opening to. It just speaks for itself, guys.

Starting point is 01:51:35 And the deal is eminent having to do with the hormones straight and also the ultimately the de-nuclearization of the man. So when I hear that, I say, well, do we want to go and be this? And there's a group of people that would like me to just do it. Who's that exactly? Yeah, all the people that we know, all the maniacs, the Lindsey Graham types, just bomb them out the face of the earth. Like these are supposed to be the leaders. They're just maniacal sociopaths, guys. I mean, it's just very clear.

Starting point is 01:52:07 That's, I mean, that's Israel, clearly. There's another group of people that does not want me to do it. Jesus, a child, there's a group that wants me to do it. I don't know. I'm confused. That's just something about the way he does that. It does not give you confidence, guys. At least not me.

Starting point is 01:52:26 But it's like he tries to play into like this like bumbling kind of like, I'm just doing the best I can. I mean, I'm just an observer. You know, they're going to tell me and I'm going to tell, well, they should listen to bombing or hurt him. I don't know why they don't want that. I just, I'm like, it's kind of, it's just, I mean, I'm starting to think more and more these days.

Starting point is 01:52:41 That just is, it's not some ploy. He's just there. He's just lost in it. Either way, continuing. on the oil part of this, I think is relevant too. This is from the third, or excuse me, the second. Trump, well, first of all, the real fly point this out, a post from Trump saying the Secretary of Energy will issue an order today that results immediate production of 50,000 barrels

Starting point is 01:53:03 of oil per day, increasing offshore oil production in California by 550%. Goodbye, Santa Barbara beaches, is what they framed it as. But the point is Trump put this out saying that's going to happen. Now, what this person, Carolina Lion, frames it as, is Trump is belatedly realizing having besent just artificially pushed down oil prices doesn't actually fix the underlying supply problem now who knows if they're accurate in that framing i just wanted to point out that we need to understand it's beyond question that they're like it's not even like they're hiding it they're manipulating the oil markets for their own benefit in like for example dumping oil that they

Starting point is 01:53:37 onto the market that would otherwise be from reserves that won't be replenished in the same way taking venezuelan oil and doing the same and it doesn't in that doesn't actually put us back on a right path it's an I've been saying that from the beginning. But on top of that, what she's pointing out, or I think it's she basically saying, you know, the percent coming out an artificial, which we all pointed out, wait, did a Ramco gets bombed and the price goes down? Okay, we're being played. And so the point was just by playing the number just actually doesn't reach the people

Starting point is 01:54:05 that need oil. So now they're rapidly trying to get it out. Maybe that was already happening. So who knows if that's, you know, just them choosing to frame it in a way that makes them look stupid. I just want you to remember, guys, that they are playing people with the markets right now, literally publicly manipulating these things for their own benefit at your expense. But on top of that, Trump comes out today and says, yeah, this was 9.50 this morning.

Starting point is 01:54:30 I'll just read it. It says, Mike Worth, chairman of CEO of Chevron, just gave an interview with the fabulous Maria Bartoloma or Barteroma all of the reasons that his company is doing so well. He says, the only thing he conveniently forgot to mention is that without the genius, foresight, strength, and stability of the Trump administration. But you love how he talks about himself that way. It's disgusting. The oil industry and the country itself would be dead. You can decide to laugh at that for yourself if you want.

Starting point is 01:54:56 But at the point is, as an example, they threw Mike and Chevron out of Venezuela, but now they're back. Yeah, remember that, by the way, when they threw out the corporations that were sucking it dry and selling them out to foreign countries, and then they used that oil to benefit other countries in the South. That's all gone now because they kidnapped Maduro. And they went right back to corporate capitalism destruction. Like, not that those are inherently bad, all government does to me, but that it is, what it represents is their exploitation of Venezuela, not the benefit of the Venezuelan people, which is what they promised they were going to do. If you fell for that for the umpte time, maybe you should reflect on that going forward. But it says that goes for other oil companies as well. Get your consumer retail oil prices down now.

Starting point is 01:55:42 that's like a third time he's done that. Anybody hearing the same old criticism? Imagine if Biden was like, get your prices down. Communism, socialism, right? It just only matters when you frame it one way. It's just the same manipulation, guys, and why does you want it down? Because he wants it to look better.

Starting point is 01:55:58 Well, if it doesn't represent the reality, why would they do that? They're going to take it on the chin for the team? That sure seems familiar. Here's Randy Fine, though, telling you why it's important to just tough it out, guys. Right? Because as usual, you get the kind of argument

Starting point is 01:56:12 that is, do you want your family to die? Or do you want the oil prices up for a week or two? It's like, well, whoa, hold on. Those are my only two choices. Extra high oil prices that you promised weren't going to be the case or killing my family. Well, then I take the oil, I guess. It's like that's the kind of stupid thing you get from people like this, the hardcore Zionists like Brandy Funt, Randy Fine,

Starting point is 01:56:32 who openly advocates for the death of children in Gaza, which is that, like he says, you know, you want to wait for Iran to bomb our country, or are you just going to tough it out with some oil prices. It's like that's not the full picture there, guys, but you know that. I mean, that's what's sad is that I think this only works for people that are on the team or blindly supporting of the Zionist agenda. Average people with two brain cells are going to go, well, that's stupid.

Starting point is 01:56:54 How about we just don't, you know, how about we find a middle ground and don't realize, it's not nuclear holocaust or $5 gas? That's not the way this works out. But that's what they want you to think. Americans, though, who have watched this back and forth, who have watched the president say, there are strikes on the horizon and then pull that back. And we've done this dance several times, sir.

Starting point is 01:57:18 So what do you say to Americans who are concerned watching that and who are watching the impact here at home? They are facing the burden of higher cost and watching this drag out. His answer is, we don't care about American suffering, fight for Israel. You can interpret this next answer how you want. That's exactly what it comes across to me.

Starting point is 01:57:37 I don't care if you want to pretend that it's because Iran's so bad. what you are saying is that we need to do this even when it is at your expense. That's not what you promised. That's not even what you're currently framing it as. That's what's happening. Yeah, look, I would say that we've been dealing with us not for a few months, but for 47 years. Yep, yep, same old thing. And remember that in 53 is when they illegally overthrew Iran.

Starting point is 01:58:04 And then in 70 or, you know, 47 years ago is when they took it back. So if you want to pretend it started then, you're just ignoring the fact that they started it with an illegal regime change. These people are children. They know what they're doing. They know what they're lying about it. And 47 years also ends up admitting that it wasn't an imminent threat. So let's cycle back through all the lies. And it's worth, you know, you could write 40,000 books about the lies they've sold in the last six months. We've been dealing with these issues with Iran. And what people need to understand is this. Iran was spending huge amounts of money to build an intercontinental ballistic missile. Yeah, a missile system as defense, like the U.S. government does all the time. These arguments they make about how these oligarchs spend their money on the military and don't help their people. And then Trump goes, we can't have daycare and Medicare and services military. It's like they don't even listen to themselves.

Starting point is 01:58:54 Or they're just too desperate to know what to say right. Intercontinental ballistic missile only had one purpose. It was to deliver a nuclear weapon to the United States. Or, you know, just missiles like the rest of them have. that could deliver any payload like the rest of them have. I mean, come on, guys. Like, this is lazy. You know, because they're evil bad guy.

Starting point is 01:59:17 They have butter knives. We can't allow that because they could use that. You know, it ends up being whatever the rationale, it's because they're bad. Okay, what's the law say, right? If you're going to allow Saudi Arabia and North Korea and everybody else, what are we talking about here? It's only because they know they don't have it.

Starting point is 01:59:33 And they know they're not seeking it. At least they haven't, which you can prove. which the U.S. intelligence showed, which the IAEA admitted over and over and recently right before this and Whitkoff lied about. I've covered all of it. Too bad people like Tucker and Alex don't cover the same because then people would actually know about it. They had all the missiles they needed to hit anywhere they wanted in Israel and the Middle East. That is a risk that the president has said we cannot face. The risk, the legal reality of what they're allowed to have is a risk they can't allow.

Starting point is 02:00:02 Okay, well, then that same logic Iran could say, well, your legal allowance to missiles is something I can't allow. So we're going to wipe you off the map. Isn't that the same logic? Yes, it is. The only difference is they believe they can do whatever they want and they believe nobody else can do the same. That's Zionist supremacist mindset, guys. That's what it is. And as much as it stinks to pay an extra dollar, a gallon of gas, which I think will come down fairly shortly. Nope, they've been saying that for five months. And it's not because it's still happening. So it won't come down. But the point is it's more than that too. And they promised this wouldn't be happening. Not just the not the war or more spending or more government or every other Maha promise,

Starting point is 02:00:42 but they promised that prices would be down, not just back to normal like the Strait of Hermosa-Ran conversation, where they're fighting to bring you back to where they started and acting like they won. They promised from day one, lower grocery prices, lower gas. They lied, guys. It's not even like they made a mistake. They didn't have any intention to follow through with almost any of it. Think about the damage of a nuclear bomb going off in Washington.

Starting point is 02:01:06 or New York or Miami. That is the risk that we simply cannot face. Great. So by that same point, you can do that with everything, right? Well, Russia could nuclear everything. So this logic, this policy has to go through. Sorry that your prices are 65 times higher. Russia could kill everybody.

Starting point is 02:01:24 Okay. Is that not the same play? I mean, it doesn't change that it's not where we, even if it's possible. That's not. So the argument is, as long as we have enemies, then your interest come second. Is that America first, Randy Fine?

Starting point is 02:01:37 No, it's the exact opposite. But secondarily, you're the one causing those threats. Maybe if you weren't bombing countries and invading people's territory and have bases every country in the world, maybe they wouldn't have that. You know, the point is obvious. They create what they use to ignore you. Pretty simple. And that is the risk that the president is dealing with right now. But how much longer can Americans continue to carry that burden?

Starting point is 02:02:02 Until we win. I mean, look, that's right? So shut up and take. it until we get what we want. You can take it. This is a guy who does not care about voters, guys. He does not care about you. If he cared about people not liking him and voting him out of his position, he wouldn't be going shut up and take it. That's not what people wanting your vote do. So you can take that as either he doesn't care about being reelected or that he doesn't worry about being reelected. What does winning look like then? Winning looks like no nuclear weapons

Starting point is 02:02:32 program in an open straight to four moves. Oh, okay. So exactly what was the case? before. And if she was a real journalist, she would say that. And the president continues to degrade Iran. One of the things the media doesn't cover is the state of play inside Iran. Iran isn't an economic collapse. There are military has collapsed. And they are the, it's just, it's so hard to listen to these clowns. Yeah, that might have gotten people in the first few weeks. You just can't keep saying that. If you, that was exactly what Trump said three days into this. Right. How is it still happening? Randy Fine. How are they still bombing things? How are they still to vending this grade. Nobody buys this. That's it. Guys, if you believe it, you're, I mean,

Starting point is 02:03:12 truly, completely uninformed about basic realities that even though the U.S. government elements in the Pentagon will tell you, or you just don't care, there's really no way around it. And that's how clear this is. It's like the sky being blue. You can sit there and call it black or whatever, you know, whatever it's a bad example. You know, something that you can call it whatever you want. But everyone's going to look and go, but it's not, though. But you'll get the occasional person that's going to agree with you. without looking. You're going to get the occasional person that will agree with you because they want something from you, but most people are going to go, but it's blue, man. I can see it.

Starting point is 02:03:44 And that's where I think we are. I think it's very clear. Now, Patriotic Blonde on the third, 8.59 a.m. Remember what she said a second ago? He won for the 247 time. Well, today Trump says the deal with Iran is close. She goes, I'm sorry. Didn't he just declare victory over the war yesterday? That's what's so stupid about this if you're paying attention. Now, I think these clips actually overlap. Let me see. Planned strikes against Iran, as he says a deal is close. According to the president talks will resume today. Nope, they didn't. He aimed at finalizing an agreement on the straight of Hormuz. Okay, but wait a minute. Didn't he just say yesterday that that was already happening? Yeah, he did.

Starting point is 02:04:26 Trump says he was asked by Qatar, the UAE and Saudi Arabia to hold off as. Oh, wait, Iran was left out. I guess Trump just inserted that when he wanted people to think Iran was actually asking him things. like I said, you could feel that he was like, and Qatar and Ron, like, that'll work. It didn't even report it to them. Diplomatic efforts play out. And then you said, this is what you saw. That's good enough anyway.

Starting point is 02:04:54 There's general points are already very clear. But this is the report of the next day, right? So that was, he said that yesterday. But the third is Trey, I believe, from Fox News reporting that. And it's laughable guys. because it's just, it's incongruent. Okay. So here he is today, later in the day, saying that Iran called and begged him.

Starting point is 02:05:17 So remember, this is already now. We've gone through the day. Iran is very publicly laughed at this and said, that's not true. We're not talking to you. And there's been numerous things from their points on Twitter going, you know, making fun of him. It's what happens because it's really hard not to at this point. So he sees that after, and you just heard, maybe they're lying to me.

Starting point is 02:05:34 Why would they? They don't want to be bombed. Okay. So all this is taken past now. So now it's today. And he's heard them deny what he told everybody was about to happen. And this is what he says again. He doubles down and says it goes from they asked me to make a deal to the truth is they begged me.

Starting point is 02:05:48 So you can look at this one or two ways. Either he now knows they lied to him and then lies over it to try to push in that they begged him to and I guess insult them. But all it does is make him look stupid really because it won't happen. Or again, there's the opaque other side of this where. You know, why would he continue to do it knowing that they said not? Either Israel's making him or he's got some other agenda in there that we're not seeing. But this is truly what he just said today after everything. So they called me and they said, please don't attack.

Starting point is 02:06:23 We'll make a deal. That's the real. Went from Saudi Arabia and Qatar saying that to now Iran called him directly and said, please don't, please. I'm begging you. Truth. And everyone knows it. And who wouldn't call?

Starting point is 02:06:38 And they found out through leaks and sleaze bags, you know, a lot of sleighers. Now he deviates into leakers are terrible, you know, because you get running from the obvious point that nobody believe. Everybody believes that. Please bags, leak, leakers. Leakers should be put in jail. They should have to strengthen up the laws for leakers. But in this case, well, some cases they're called whistleblowers Trump, and it means they're exposing a crime. But you guys don't care about that.

Starting point is 02:07:04 It's leakers helped because they said the severity of the attack. And you realize that the claim that it was going to be worse in World War II largely came out after it already been clear that it wasn't going to happen. You know what I mean? It's just, I mean, you can prove that, guys. You can look at the timeline. I think truly Trump sits there and just kind of pieces things in his mind and just kind of puts it out there. And we see it.

Starting point is 02:07:28 And then often enough, you get the Pentagon that comes or Carolyn Levin's like, well, what Trump actually meant was so and so. And it's laughably, obviously not what he meant. You know, it's they do it every day. And you'd think they would eventually get around this, but maybe Trump just doesn't want to hear it. Iran knew it. They knew what was coming. It was going to come last night.

Starting point is 02:07:47 And it would have got on for a long time. Why wouldn't you have done that already? Why wouldn't you just be doing that? If you keep telling us that you've already won and you want this to end and they're monster maniac, Muslim rapist terrorists, they're going to kill us for our family. You know, it's how do you piece it together? You don't. They know they're lying about them and they know that they are in a bad position. It has to be seen by now.

Starting point is 02:08:06 there'd be essentially very little left there'd be nothing left which implied death of all civilians but they're way past hiding that if i'm given a chance to let a lot of people live piecing it together i want to give that chance so what if i give a chance for to let people live i want to get that chance wow like it's just that this is what i'm talking of you can't deny that He was like, let me line this together. And he's just trying to find something to say. You want to just move on.

Starting point is 02:08:42 Be like next. You know, it's like you're in control. Why do you have to ramble through this? Let a lot of people. If I'm given a chance to let a lot of people live, I want to give that. So to let a lot of people live? Like, what a weird way to say that. Like, that's just because he stumbled into it.

Starting point is 02:09:02 He didn't know what he was saying when he started opening his mouth. How do we not see that? I'm under no time contract. You know, I don't happen to be running, but a lot of very good Republicans are running. You know what he means by that? And this is so transparent to what they all think. And we know this. He's not running for another administration.

Starting point is 02:09:20 Now again, people are all talking about how he put the hat on. And who knows, it wouldn't surprise me. But it could also be a troll. The point, though, is that what he's really saying is that he's not, he doesn't have to vie for the political game. Because we all know, guys, that never stops. You get elected, day one, you're looking at the next election. And we know that.

Starting point is 02:09:36 It's not just two years in forward, which become the next two years, we're all about the next election, which in and of itself should be insane since you have two years to do things. But always admitting is that, well, I don't know, I've got nothing to worry about. I'm not running for life. So every other time, it's always only been about what you need. That's politics. And you really have to know that by now, guys. They don't really care.

Starting point is 02:09:54 It's all about means to an end for politicians. The sick ideology taken place right now that, you know, hopefully they'll be defeated because they'll destroy the country if they ever takeover. But this desk is like a blocking desk. Right, so Democrats will destroy everything if they take over power. It's the same thing the Republicans said, the Democrats say, and they cycle around, they point at each other, and they stop us for realizing they're all one thing, taking control of our lives. Guys, you just have to see that.

Starting point is 02:10:19 They will, I mean, did you not just call it the Unity Party when you started? The same people you already knew, and half of them were at the front row of your inauguration? You just can't pretend like he means all this stuff. The truth is, he wants you to hate the other side, so you're not focusing on them. No matter who gets in. If it's bad, I block. And I'm good at blocking. If it's bad, if it's stupid things, like the things they want to do.

Starting point is 02:10:46 It's just hard to even take him seriously at this point. And it's not about a left-right thing. It's that he, as it is whoever, left-right, Trump, Biden, what he's doing deserves to be called out. It's very, very hard to watch. Now, as I said before, it is. Groundhog Day on Loop, as Godfrey pointed out. That's how it's very hard to miss how weirdly cyclical this is. Now, Golden Phoenix just laughingly points out the cycle.

Starting point is 02:11:10 Trump's Iran war summarized every single week. Monday, no negotiations. Tuesday. They are liars. Wednesday. We will hit them hard. Thursday. Bridges, power plants will go.

Starting point is 02:11:20 Friday. Their civilization will end. Saturday. They are calling and begging. Sunday. Deal is close. Begin cycle again. Monday.

Starting point is 02:11:28 No negotiations. I mean, it's actually not that far off. Maybe there is a pattern here or like a tactic we're missing. But CBS. Iran said Monday it had no plans to hold direct talks with Washington, despite Trump claiming otherwise. Here's a direct pose. Iran says currently, this is middle of the day today. Negotiations with the U.S. Not happening. Now, again, it could be lying, as I say every time. But of course, when we look back two days from now, tomorrow, you'll usually be able to tell for yourself since it didn't happen, right? Simple, very simple. Now, here's what Trump said today. Or rather just the, you know, the point is in the midst of it all. This is what coming out today.

Starting point is 02:12:06 Updates. Trump, Iran has last chance to sign deal before decapitation. I'm pretty sure this was a statement from today. So you have this weird cycle where it's like, we're going to make a deal and it's all going to work out. And then all of a sudden, Iran goes, that's not happening. It goes, they're begging me, which was a follow-up after they said that wasn't happening. Then it becomes, you better make the deal that you just said, you just told us they begged you for or it'll be a decapitation strike, which why didn't you do that the last 17 times?

Starting point is 02:12:31 Because he's losing. If you can't really understand this by now, you truly. don't want to see it. That doesn't mean that they can't take some stain action, but we need to realize where this is. Drop site news, there's not going to be, this was, what was this again? Oh, that's right, the straight. I put this in as I was getting ready to go live, about the Strait of Hermuz. So basically about the tolls. And this is what he's saying right now. This is as up today about whether there's tolls or there's going to be tolls. And really, I mean, I already, I already talked about it. All he says is there, if there's not going to be tools, it

Starting point is 02:13:08 There's not going to be charges. He goes, it has to be, if anyone will charge, we'll charge. He keeps doing that. But he goes, we have total control. It's just, it's verifiably not true. That's how hard that is to, it's cringy. You can even look at the faces of people around him when it's like, they know that's not what's happening.

Starting point is 02:13:24 This is we have a thing called a blockade with this Navy. They call it the United States wall of steel. It's not going to be any charging. No, no. Okay. Well, it's already happened more than once. So he's wrong. But it's just, this is that bombastic, hubris.

Starting point is 02:13:38 that's unfounded, it does not represent it in the real world that is, I see as desperate. Even Zero Hedge, who's been largely supportive of him, says, less than five days until Trump announces the next massive Iran strike at 401 on Friday. Everybody's calling him out, guys. They're making fun of the cycle and making fun of the fact that it's going to do it on Friday and then pull back on Monday. And they're coming, zero hedge is largely from the financial perspective, because that's what that means, the manipulation of the cycle.

Starting point is 02:14:06 Now, there's funny, there was a big report coming out from corporate media about breaking down how Axios and Trump have inorganic breakdown. We're like, welcome to the party, guys. Everybody's been calling that out the entire time, but everyone sees it. Lastly, Ron Yackella Kali points this out in regard to CNN's report. She's just dragging the world into hell because they can't accept they lost. Now, we should question this. It is corporate media, especially CNN, but the bottom line is they'll deny this even if it's true. We know that.

Starting point is 02:14:34 Feels accurate to me. The request from a senior officer at the U.S. military command, carrying out Donald Trump's war with Iran, came in an email. We need ideas. Quote, we are looking for new, creative, and unconventional ways to pressure and punish Iran, said an officer in the U.S. Central Command Intelligence Branch, wrote this message on Wednesday to a broad group of military analysts. I don't know how you get away from it, you know, they have the source material. And of course, they could argue it's a lie or probably just just leak and use that way to ignore it. But the truth is, guys, what does this show you? If they're going, please give us new ideas, they're floundering.

Starting point is 02:15:16 We must see that by now. And that goes in line with the report that just came out of Trump screaming and cussing at the people in the room. You know, you have no way out of this and you tricked me into this. Like, who knows if it's accurate? He denied it. Feels accurate. But if they're going to give us ideas, what to do next, it's pretty damn clear that they are not in a winning position. So we'll leave it there for today. I think it's pretty clear all the way through.

Starting point is 02:15:41 Take the time to look through the source material. Don't just listen to what I have to say. Educate yourselves in this stuff because it's important to not just be able to relay headlines, but to be able to intelligently discuss the details of these conversations. And if you believe in this platform, if you like the work that we put out, we run completely on, you know, we put out our product, which is the show. And we say, you know, if you find value in it, let us know what it's worth to you. right so that's the only way this platform exists through your support for it so if you think it's valuable let us know i love you all as always question everything come to your own conclusions stay vigilant

The Last American Vagabond - RFK Lies Again About Ending GoF Research & Returning Moroccan Migrants Violently Stopped At Border

There aren't comments yet for this episode. Click on any sentence in the transcript to leave a comment.