The Last American Vagabond - TDWU - 3/29/26: Trump Releases White House App With Dangerous Spyware & Israeli Spyware's Quiet Comeback Under Trump

Starting point is 00:00:00 It starts with a simple question and ends in objective reality. Reality. Through our journey from there to here, we find one another and ourselves. And as the next 24 hours breaks free from our last, we gaze onward in reflection of the day. Welcome to the daily wrap up. Sunday March 29th, 2026. Thank you for joining me today. Now, technically this is the end of my week.

Starting point is 00:00:48 That's so my plan was going to be something a little bit different. And I failed to get it ready today. But I wanted to run it by you guys because I think the way I'm going to, you know, like I've been kind of working my way into this new kind of schedule, planning to do more consecutive work, possibly take more days off in a row, but five a week, two days off, kind of a plan, all just keeping you guys informed. I'm going to do what works for me anyway. But at the end of the day, I wanted to do something today, which I thought would be interesting.

Starting point is 00:01:14 To be clear, I'm not going to do. But I wanted you guys to hear for next week and kind of get some feedback if you think this would be good. My problem is going to be whether I'm going to choose to do this these days, but to maybe do like an end of the week wrap up of the week and sort of outline all the different things that I thought, like the big story bullet points in case you don't have time to watch the longer shows or even just five shows in a week, which there's a lot of, a lot of people out there that don't have the same time opening. And so maybe there'll be a point where at the end of the

Starting point is 00:01:43 week, maybe I post on the substack as well. So there's sort of like a week wrap up, but just bullet points with the links to the shows. And I thought maybe the Sunday or whatever day it ends up being on will be sort of a few extra points with an overview of those things to make it a shorter day. I just thought it would be an interesting thing to get it sort of, you know, the weekly work wrapped up. But again, I'm not going to do that today because as I sat down to do that, there's some, this one story, which I know you guys have all seen, I obviously wanted to touch on. And as I was going through this, it was sort of, it ended up largely being something I want, I want to go into this about the White House app, which we're going to talk about today,

Starting point is 00:02:20 which it's spyware. That's not a hyperbole. That's not, it's my opinion. It's like the definition of spyware. it is spyware. And it's insane to me that that's even happening. And I'm wondering whether that's an accident or like, you know, they didn't know it was the case. And that means somebody else.

Starting point is 00:02:35 You know, all the thoughts, right? But then as I went through it, I'm, you know, there's a lot that we would want to, I guess, juxtapose with that that we've already talked about and a lot of some other new things I wanted to include. And I thought it would be good just to make that a focus today, which probably won't even be short. We'll see where we end up. But I thought I'm going to include some coverage about two things in addition to that. I want to make sure at the end, we keep up today on some points I wanted you to see about Iran.

Starting point is 00:03:01 Tomorrow we'll get more in depth on some of the deeper conversation of that developing illegal war. But I'm going to start as well with a point that I just thought was interesting for a lot of reasons that you'll see. That connect to a lot of what we discussed today, but just in general that I think is important for the sort of partisan, you know, the aggressive manipulation that is taking place in the partisan field today that is well beyond anything I've ever seen before, at least as I've been doing this. And the point within that is to discuss the No Kings Day point, which part of me felt like it was largely because of it's more just a propaganda story around a lot of this, but it's important to discuss for many reasons, including money in politics and how important

Starting point is 00:03:41 that is. And so that point to start today, the bulk of which will be Israeli spyware as a stone story, not even and not even to imply that this is Israeli spyware in the White House app. Because I'll make the case when we get there, just about the, obvious over connect the connection between all of this and what that may mean for where we are and then just a general point about where is really spyware is in the world and how trump's administration has basically given it a quiet comeback and we're going to go around all that and those are two separate stories but i'm sure you can connect the dots on where these things may

Starting point is 00:04:11 overlap now let me know as i said what you think about the wrap-up point of the weekly thing i do curious what you guys think and whether you'd rather just have another in-depth show but i'd like to hear from both the the die-hard long show watchers as well as everybody does casual washers as well. But, you know, really, this developing story is bigger than just one app, one technological manipulation. There's a change like, and I'm not even talking about the technocratic conversation that we're having a lot. That's clearly a part of this. But there's something about the way this is all transitioning that it speaks to something much, much more alarming to me and much more invasive, insidious. As we're looking at something else and this is sort of happening

Starting point is 00:04:52 behind the scenes. And so I just want people to think about that long-term play in all of this, including with the foreign policy taking place today. Now, I'm going to start out with one quick point just to kind of nod to, you know, the off-work point. And I really want to just stress this idea that this is one of the reasons why I'm trying to reorganize the schedule, so this just doesn't utterly consume every second of my life, which, by the way, I'm all up for that. Like that's my choice. I'm choosing to, you know, this matters to me. You matter to me.

Starting point is 00:05:24 And that's why it's important for me to get involved in all of this, to, you know, really put my head down no matter what the consequences are. That's how I look at it. But at the same time, to do my best to kind of organize it. So I have some semblance of a life on top of this work. And so part of that has to do with gardening and different things I want to do in the off time. So I just put this out on yesterday.

Starting point is 00:05:43 And I, you know, just want to show you guys that we are starting our gardening again this year. And that what you're seeing here are just the small. middle of the yard things we added in addition to the garden that we have to grow lettuce and other things and it's really nice to see it might it's it's really important i think that we do this and not only for the outlet to find reasons to get outside and as i said touch grass right remember what we're fighting for but on top of that just to you know find a reason you know the outlet to to lose yourself in it like so part of it is to just get involved and i mean i guess that's

Starting point is 00:06:17 I guess the two parts would be to do that and then to do it to prepare. Not for some, you know, 30 seconds away, we're all going to die kind of event, and all that too, but just to be smart, to be prepared, to be self-sustainable. These aren't necessarily, we're all going to die tomorrow kind of thing. They're just intelligent, you know, being prepared and making sure you can be sustainable should something happen, you know, something that has always ever happened. In every history, you know, I guess confusing way to say that, there will always be an event. every history, every currency,

Starting point is 00:06:49 there's never been a Fiat currency that has continued forever, right? There will always be a point at which something ends and collapses, and it's just being prepared for that. It's been a long time. Let me give me some feedback here real quickly. Let me know you guys can hear me. I won't let me double check, make sure this is playing. Some weird reason I'm just seeing, yeah, this is playing.

Starting point is 00:07:08 Good, good. Some of the other platforms seem to be acting funny. It's showing zero. So let's get into this then. But on that note, just again, you know, find that time, guys. Whatever job, what are you doing, whether it's this or something else, find the time to do your best to break away because we all need it. And it really is important.

Starting point is 00:07:25 Now, this is something we're going to get to after the opening point. But just want to throw it out there for those that have, you know, maybe just caught the beginning and you just wanted to, I want this in somebody's mind out there. Derek wrote this article, 2024, November 30th. Meet the spyware companies prepared to unleash their tech during Trump's second term. Now, this is important for whether the app came out or not. And I just wanted to one demonstrate our value yet again, that if had we been focused on these things, and I'll even make the point that had we been focused on the people who were covering this long before TLAV was ever talking about it, long before I was ever doing this. Same point applies that we had an opportunity to maybe stop some of these things that are happening.

Starting point is 00:08:04 And this is not necessarily the app point, but just the idea that this kind of stuff, spyware, Pegasus, Spyware, Paragon Solutions, NSO Group, all kind of the same point. it's exploding and literally has blended in to the background of a Virginia-based U.S.-based company. I'll show you. It's called Red Ladis. And it literally has blended between, like, so basically this is something that was being kicked aside because everyone in the world was calling it what it was. A fraudulent criminal.

Starting point is 00:08:33 I mean, like this was the one that's important right here. Oops, the wrong one. We'll come back to all these. But just for people to remember, they were literally caught. An Israeli spyware firm caught by other government. for hacking, for spying on journalists. This is quite literally the same stuff that is immersed with U.S. industry and government, literally.

Starting point is 00:08:54 So that point being there, I think is relevant for when we get into the app and whatever's behind it, which appears to be other companies we'll talk about. Just realizing that this is something for the point of stopping the stuff that we had an opportunity to stop to push back on. But so many screening partisans out there stop people from caring about what really mattered. always. So let's start with that point. The idea of partisanship and how insane this all is. Now, this is an important thing that we talked, we touched on this before. I mean, only important in my mind insofar as that we discuss the reality of protesting and constitutional rights

Starting point is 00:09:29 and the manipulation within all of that. And how governments will always try to manipulate gaslight, asperatured every single chance they get. And if we can just accept that basic reality, verifiable throughout my entire time doing this ever since I've started, then we can acknowledge that it's not one side or one group or one thing. Now, yes, so clearly whatever topic you pick, there's going to be a slant, maybe, or a 1% difference or 100%, that at some point it's going to either be, you know, it's always a mixed bag in my opinion and it's going to lean one way or the other. It doesn't always mean that it's one thing or the other only. And within that, in every topic we deal with, you get political partisans who are aggressively trying to misrepresent everything for,

Starting point is 00:10:10 their benefit for, you know, and their personal benefit and their political team benefit. So this topic is interesting because last time, what would we hear? Incessantly, not like for weeks, they're going to, you know, like basically fever pitch, the country is going to collapse. Burning things down, murder, you know, violence, dangerous. Even the, even the suggestion that it was somehow also overlapped with foreign entities. The same old, you know, just the, you pick. The same story.

Starting point is 00:10:40 any of those things you shouldn't deny either or rather disregard you should consider while looking for evidence. The point is you can clearly see as any other major event, whether organized from that starting point or not, was eventually influenced funded by plenty of big political organizations, PACs, whatever. But the point was, which that we'll get into why that matters in a second, because it should, and we should care, we should take note of what group seems to be influencing whatever we're dealing with because organic anything today seems to be part of the story if any right the point being is even an organic thing will start and things will get manipulated people can show up on their own accord and join it and always so we shouldn't assume one way or the other but

Starting point is 00:11:21 last time what happened nothing there was zero violence which that could have been the plan from the coordinated event which ultimately at that point what difference does it make you know we'll get into this the idea being that there was nothing that they hyped even to where it ended up some kind of, oh, well, that's, you know, I'm not to get into all the dumb stuff. The point is that it end up being not violent. The only real main events that happened were because of Maga protesters doing things to the people that were there. And that's not to say that that's the violent side. I see it goes both ways, guys. If you're not ridiculous and you pay attention just barely beyond one administration, you'll see that it goes both ways. Like anybody

Starting point is 00:11:56 I've ever talked to who does this nonpartisan perspective work will agree because it does. And I'll make this point, we get into this right now about what we saw from the Republican side of this. what's important to me is that we understand what this seems to be doing. Even if every claim they're making is correct, when a crime is committed and there's something that people, then go for it, go after it. Otherwise, if there's not a crime and you've got major political institutions, which are funding and gaslighting and astroturfing, then call it out.

Starting point is 00:12:26 The point is that every single side does this today. And the reality is if we start to say they can't do this or the point of just anybody, because that's what it comes down to, You think you're going to stop Elon Musk from dumping money into things, the Koch brothers, or George Soros isn't? No, you're not because that's going to continue to happen. I will agree with anybody that that is a problem in this situation. The answer is not to say stop that from happening because what happens then is we cannot coordinate. So hypothetically, if I'd gone out to this no king's protest myself personally in Nashville and walked out there, would I suddenly be a Democrat operative?

Starting point is 00:13:00 I don't mean the people who want to pretend that's the case. I mean, as an independent, nonpartisan person, I had half a mind to go out and just see what was going on, whether I supported or not. Would I then become a Democrat operative? Because that's the kind of game is being played. They're all shills and it's all paid for it. It's all X, Y, and Z. And that's just dumb. So let's go through this with an open mind and recognize that there's 100% political manipulation taking place.

Starting point is 00:13:23 And my mind, especially for those that are, you know, in addition to what I was going to say and see it as the full two-party illusion, reality, that there's a game being played. to get you to attack the other side. So my point on top of all of it is that even if everything they're saying is true, the game is only to get you to drive and take action against your neighbor, not the government who's playing both sides against each other. That's always the point. And I frankly think that most people see that today. That's why it's becoming harder and harder for these things to gain any momentum because immediately people like us are like, well, skeptical, question it. You know, don't blindly take any of it at face value. And so everyone's coming into it with a level of skepticism and we're watching for things. So let's start with this clip.

Starting point is 00:14:06 I mean, even to my point is I try to like kind of get a quick encapsulation to start, is that even that, you know, there's somebody that's going to be hearing that and think that I left out a certain part that causes X, Y, and Z, you know, probably from an honest place. I just want to really stress that whether I included everything or not, which will go through here, you know, you don't have to believe me, question me, but this is coming from a place that is not taking the side. This is not about one group first the other. This is not about left versus right. It's not about no kings. It's about any group left or right, Republican or liberal or Democrat, whatever, who want to stand up whether or not they know a thing is manipulated or whether

Starting point is 00:14:40 it is or not and simply express themselves. Go out there with a sign they made or one they bought or somebody gave them when they walked up and say, I don't think this is right. If we can't allow that, if we get to a point to where anybody even doing that, whether of their own volition or not, is somehow now suspect because of the partisan game, we have lost. it's over, at least in regard to whatever this experiment it is. And that's really important to think about because the ability for us to go out and speak our minds freely is so important in this situation. And I just think that me, think about what happened at January 6th. And think about how clearly anybody who's nice, and this is important for those that want to think this

Starting point is 00:15:19 is about me secretly being on one side or the other, you know how vocally we stood up for the people at January 6th, how continually to this very moment, even with recent people who I think were pretending to be more objective and more open-minded to things too partisan, government, whatever, who got immediately angry when the argument became, well, I don't think that represents most conservatives. Oh, the magomorons and all the, it's like, well, reality for me was that there was a core group of people that were very manipulative. That's very clear, very aggressive. And there was a lot within there that connected back to all sorts of government things, you know, go into the Capitol. But the vast majority that I could see were just conservatives

Starting point is 00:15:55 who genuinely, whether right or not, whether correct or not, believe that they were stolen from, believe that there was something they were doing, something they were standing up for that mattered. Anybody that committed violence? There's a crime. You could call them out.

Starting point is 00:16:08 Arrest them, including the government, who shot somebody, or the person who broke in. The point is so clear, guys, it's easy to see how this will go in the direction, which is anti-American, which is against the ability to do any of this. Now, what this is going to be

Starting point is 00:16:23 is a clip from somebody. it's a part of a clip. It's like seven-minute segment. I watch most of it, but it doesn't really add that much more except for the point that they're just, it's very petty. The politics you get from left and right today, CNN, Fox News, it's always very derisive and making fun of them. There's no real effort to be objective and make it sort of, which, hey, all fairness, I do that half the time too, because we're talking about people that I think are ridiculous. So maybe that's what they think. Maybe I should stop doing that. The point is that when you're watching this, I think it's very clear to see that instead of coming at this like, these people could be out there doing their own thing

Starting point is 00:16:54 or this could be paid, it comes out, well, they make fun of the age. Are they taking met a metamuseal? And like, you know, they're meant to completely laugh at what they're doing instead of recognize that what they're doing is a foundational part of this country. The journalism is supposed to be a part of. You get the point. So what he is saying, or what she's saying, rather, he's reporting on, is that this is something that is paid for billions and billions of dollars.

Starting point is 00:17:18 And she doesn't make it a lot of speak for itself. It's not some very manipulative thing other than the implication. that this then undermines the overall point. Let's watch it first. These 500 groups would get this a $3 billion budget collectively. And where does their political influence, their political contributions and their individual employee donations go, but mostly to the Democratic Party? And that's why we see the silence.

Starting point is 00:17:50 And unfortunately, they pull their punches on the issues that matter. you, for example, that you just cited because that would mean turning against the Democratic politicians that they're trying to keep in power. It's so great to have you with us today, Kevin Corp. So simply, you know, the things that you decide to care about, well, okay, let's take a step back and realize that people have different things they care about, right? So how dare they not stand up and scream about the things that you guys think they should scream about, which is essentially what they talked about?

Starting point is 00:18:20 And of course, you could argue because everybody would care about this thing. well, that's your opinion, right? That they must have done. If they don't, that means they're hiding for the Democrats. It's very subjective. Maybe they're right. I just think it's really stupid of us to listen to corporate media who wants to give you subjective ideas when you're supposed to be presenting this as a fact-based report.

Starting point is 00:18:38 Now, what you can discuss, which will go over, including what Grock's perspective is on it, only from a partisan view to understand that it's even what they're framing for you from people like Eric Dowderty is about to try, it's about trying to make this sound invalid. that's what this really comes down to. Holy smokes different than holy crap, but I guess there's a varying level of importance. It was just confirmed that no King's protests are fun to out confirmed.

Starting point is 00:19:03 Now, this is what I love. Now, first of all, she works for Fox News. The clip that he was playing is a woman that works for Fox News Digital. She comes on and makes this statement. And then it ripples through. Now, I'm going to take it at face value just to make the point today. And I do think there's, but it's subjective for a few reasons we'll get into. But realize that these people do not verify this stuff.

Starting point is 00:19:21 I've proven this 100 times over. It's now confirmed because Fox said it out loud. You mean the Fox News platform that gets just as much wrong as CNN? They don't care, guys. It's about the narrative control. It's about team sport politics. Fox investigated and found, Fox did, found it's George Soros and Neville Singh Hamlink groups and nonprofits.

Starting point is 00:19:41 Well, actually, that's not as accurate. Soros was a part of that. And then, of course, Marxist groups were involved, communism. They were there for a revolution. Well, okay. Well, what they're talking about. by the way, are groups that showed up and protested alongside them. You know what I mean?

Starting point is 00:19:55 And this is what's so frustrating about this is, yeah, it certainly could be something that they organized because they believed in that, and that still would be their right to protest that. Are we going to pretend like we didn't hear Democrats, Republicans screaming about revolution about overthrowing the government? Yeah, because they both did it. It's just silly that we act, oh, my, clutch my pearls about when they say the things that we were just screaming.

Starting point is 00:20:13 Because they're the bad ones, because we can all tell, right? The point, though, on top of that is that these groups are like anywhere else can show up. so people have a massive protest, a nationwide protest. You think that literally everybody that walked into this protest were just all apart. People walked from the streets and stood up there. Maybe they have their own personal things to call for. So people there that are protesting for anything, the assumption that everything said anywhere in this group is indicative of what the organization wants you to think,

Starting point is 00:20:39 is got to be the dumbest argument in the conversation today. It could, and I wouldn't deny that, but it also could be a group that showed up and brought their signs and said, here's what I think on top of that, that they just mash together because it's all policy. politics. It's even frustrating that we have to go through these very basic understandings of, you know, just objectivity, but that's what we have to do today. So the money is interesting. Here is what Grock had to say about this first in regard to the, oh, what I asked, this was,

Starting point is 00:21:12 I forgot about this one. So basically the first point was, you know, the difference between Republican election protests or whatever else and what they're doing. Not the money necessarily. and we're going to get into that second because what's one point that's like almost intentionally ignore it is dark money, which seems to be very, very prevalent on the Republican side of this conversation. It's everywhere, really. But when it comes to like, for example, what just happened with no kings, it's all pretty public, which I think speaks for itself. I don't mean that it's, that means it's not riddled with corruption, but it just means

Starting point is 00:21:41 that it's very different when you have a group who's like, it's all out there, but you're going to tell them it's some shadowy manipulative thing when it's all posted publicly and you can look at it. Then over here you have, for example, specifically in regard to the stop the steel stuff. Well, the majority of that was dark money. You can't really see what and how much. That matters. It could very well be 30 times that or not or half of it. You don't know.

Starting point is 00:22:03 That's the point. But this, and this was in regard to the comparison, claiming an ecosystem of roughly 500 organizations with a combined three billion annual revenue is what she was arguing. Now, this is from their investigation. So it should be taken with a grain of salt like anything should. In this case, though, we're talking about 500. different organizations that they claim as a combined $3 billion in annual revenue. That's quite a bit different than they put $3 billion into this, which is what everyone's

Starting point is 00:22:30 basically now saying. Isn't that different? It is different. On top of the fact that it's 500 organizations. So to me, I mean, okay, just for a mental exercise, hypothetically, let's say I stood up right now and said, hey, I have a problem with what our government is doing. not left or right, but the whole damn thing. And I want to coordinate a massive protest to stand up and say, look, because you know what I think?

Starting point is 00:22:56 I think we all see it. I think I genuinely mean this right now. Most of us, I think, are seeing even through the two-party paradigm to some degree. So I want to start something. I rather like, you know, next week or a year, month from now, I want to have a massive nationwide standup where we all stay. We see this and we're protesting. Okay. And then it just kind of spirals, it gets crazy.

Starting point is 00:23:15 And people start funding a different group step in. I can't control everything that happens around. that and all the but the sentiment was what started it and then suddenly or even just groups that i create or maybe i'm a part of 500 different organizations step in and go we agree with that we want to stand by these principles or whatever like you could even say that now it starts to get muddled with people manipulating it oh they want to do this but they want to bring in their partisanship i can't control somebody who's doing this in an organic way can't control all that hypothetically the point is let's say 500 groups got involved and that amount to a bunch of money and we stand up and have a

Starting point is 00:23:44 massive protest that we're calling out that we don't want the government to be doing these illegal no violence happens and it's all over. Now, I mean, and let's just say that's exactly what happened that it was me that started the whole damn thing. Now, you could easily pretend to frame that however you wanted. Well, let's just say we know for a fact that it was me. Now, would you call that some kind of gaslit astroturf situation? And how would that be any different?

Starting point is 00:24:04 Now, it may be unlikely that it would get as large, especially with censorship and suppression, but isn't that possible? Like, wouldn't we like to believe that in a world where people are genuinely starting to see it? Like, let's tack on one thing. Let's say we're at a point where, with not my opinion, Let's say we are at a point where we know for a fact, which I think we're there. Most Americans are seeing all of this, are seeing the problem.

Starting point is 00:24:27 And let's just say we can prove that. 80%, 90% of Americans are like, these are dictators. We're done. Then we go and we all march out in the streets. So shouldn't we hope that we get to that point? Shouldn't we be going, well, that means that we're all agreeing that we see the problem? Okay, so now we take a step back and compare that to what this is. I'm not saying that's what this was.

Starting point is 00:24:48 But you see, now we step into a world where how in the hell do we know anymore? When everything that's organized because they've got signs, it must be what Trump said, nothing means anything. It's all protest, gas lit. It's either Soros or it's Elon. It's either the Koch brothers or whatever, I'll go through the names in a second. And then all of a sudden, it all means nothing. Then we no longer have any real effort to show the world that we don't see.

Starting point is 00:25:09 And I'm the one that's often pointed to the diminished influence of protesting, but I've never said it was not important. I've never said it was not that it has a purpose, guys. Now, maybe I'm belaboring the point, but I'll tell you, this seems important to me. The general idea of what they're driving at and what they're trying to hide or, you know, it's like jury nullification or a number of things that people don't even know about anymore because they've driven us to a direction where we don't even talk about it. How long until we just suddenly stop, you know, well, any protest means politics has been money and they're cheating.

Starting point is 00:25:40 Telling you guys, I see where this is going. Like a lot of other things we've saw years before it actually started to happen and we try. to call attention to it and had a moment to stop it and people didn't listen and didn't happen. Not making it all about us. There's plenty of us that are doing that, independent media. I may. But back to this point. So 500 different organizations combined with combined annual revenue of $3 billion was involved in sponsoring and supporting them.

Starting point is 00:26:05 And it's very sporadic. It's tied to left-leading funders like George Soros. That was one of many, Neville Roy Singham. Right. So you have these specific groups that took. part that then you got people like Eric and the rest who are broadly brushing the entire thing as one group. Stop the Steel rallies featured groups like Turning Point USA, a very, very, very influential and very

Starting point is 00:26:28 wealthy organization, which pretty sure we can all see right now, maybe it was different before, is, you know, problematic. $300,000 described as the lion's share in some reports. Smaller amount, absolutely. But we'll get to a point about why this is different in all sides of it, even including right now, it could be way more than $3 billion. billionaires on both sides. So if it's really,

Starting point is 00:26:49 if it's not about necessarily the money, but the influence, which is what we're talking about, the money is just an example, right? The money is an identifier. Here's a mechanism they're using to influence the outcome. Money is one of them.

Starting point is 00:27:01 There's plenty of others we've talked about. But so the more money, the more it goes, wow, okay, they really put something into that, right? So what we're talking about is the influence. That's the issue, right? So when you've got billionaire influencers and financiers,

Starting point is 00:27:14 fake philanthropists, then it's the same conversation. Koch brothers, Teal, Adelson's, whatever this one is, Ulanese, or Ullilns,

Starting point is 00:27:28 how wait, am I reading that wrong? E. Helens? That's a weird last name. But then Soros, Singham, others, Tides Foundation. Yeah, man,

Starting point is 00:27:37 it's both sides if we're not lying to ourselves. What's also interesting is how little pushback you get from people on the other side. Why? Why? Because I think that's part of the game. Right now we're supposed to be focusing this way. Just like before, we were supposed to focus the other way. Coordination happens. This is interesting. Rallies don't materialize in a vacuum. Grock writes, social media, existing activist list, buses,

Starting point is 00:27:57 permits, shared. Like, they're simply saying this is what has always happened. We've just decided to sort of overfixate on the parts that are clearly being abused by wealthy people to act like it was never, you know, it's just, it's weird to me how much this has been going on. And it says, in short, it's not fundamentally different in the mechanisms of funding, left, or right. Coordination, billionaire, nonprofit involvement. American politics runs on this mix of genuine passion, professional organizing, and big money from allied donors. That's not how I would want it to be, but that's where we are. The hypocrisy is real. Outrage over AustroTurf usually depends on whose ox is gourd. And the point is that they're just saying it's both sides do it.

Starting point is 00:28:36 And even Grock will tell you that. Now let's get into the point of why it looks or can look different. I'll just include this. It explains very detailed what dark money is. Just understand it means money that is not able to be seen or traced back to the person. That's what a lot of these packs were originally kind of designed to do or rather disconnected from direct donations to the politician. Now it's got to the point to where you can find ways to do it where you can't even be seen doing it. All this is is a continual, you know, bloating of the problem. So here's what Fox News reported. 500 groups with 3 billion revenues. See, yet you're still hearing that they put $3 billion in this. It's not what that says

Starting point is 00:29:15 are behind the no king's protests. See, it's different. But the money is still being used some of the money. The point is 500 groups which have $3 billion in revenue annually were supporting this. I'm not getting, I'm not able to find specifics on this because everything's so mired in nonsense today. But I doubt it's $3 billion in total based on the statement being their 500 groups that were supporting this collectively make $3 billion in annual. annual revenue. So kind of find it unlikely, but, you know, certainly possible. And of course, it says protest and communist call for revolution. You mean like, like every day of their lives? Yeah. So the difference is that they showed up and said it here. Okay, big deal. I mean,

Starting point is 00:29:53 let's be real about this. The game is so ridiculous right now. Are we not talking about, I mean, are you, oh, you mean, while you're literally supporting your own government, just knocking governments around the world and overtog, you know, murdering and killing. But yes, you know, they're bad for wanting to stop. I don't agree with their politics. I don't want communism. I don't want any government, frankly. But it's funny for me that people can gripe and clutch their pearls about these people with their views calling for revolution while you're literally cheering on a genocide, you utter hypocrite. But a network of about 500 groups with an estimated 3 billion in combined annual ever-evenues. Oh, now estimated. Funny how more abstract that keeps getting,

Starting point is 00:30:29 the more you dig into the story is behind the coordinated nationwide no kings protest Saturday. A network. So let's be clear about what they're actually saying is a group of people who individually in some ways, part, we're influencing funding some elements of this thing that we call a network, which will be clear, I do think it's a network. I think we're talking about people who tend to come together when they want to organize these things and many ways for their benefit. It does not mean the individuals on the street don't care about what they're fighting for, but it is to be it's just like it is the other side. But you could argue that it may be that it's just a grouping of people that they then call a network. I'm just being objective, but I would

Starting point is 00:31:06 agree. I do think that they're interconnected behind it. And it says, calling for revolution, according to what she said, and already addressed the communism port. According to a copy of the permit for the flagship march, of course, big surprise out of all the different nationwide protest, she went to Minnesota. I wonder why. And the group is called Indivisible. A national, well-heeled, democratic, political advocacy organization funded by George Soros is, as the Fox News reports, the lead coordinator for the protest. So it seems the indivisible group is the one they're making the focal point. That's the group.

Starting point is 00:31:44 The one that they claim. So if it's a network, the argument is that the group that is executing this from the head of the network. So I find that interesting, right? So indivisible, did it fund every protest that we happened yesterday, according to Grock? No, it did not fund every protest. Indivisible, a progressive grassroots network played a major corporate. coordinating an organizing role in many events. Not even the majority.

Starting point is 00:32:08 They hosted or promoted numerous local rallies on their site, provided tools for fighting protests. So, oh, just a website. Helped with permits, sound equipment, safety in some cities like San Francisco, and co-led the broader coalition effort. Not the same thing as making this about some, you know, very different, I would argue. And it says the protests formed a decentralized coalition

Starting point is 00:32:29 involving indivisible, publicly, by the way, the 5050 one movement, the 50 states, 50 protests, one movement, labor unions across the country, other groups like ACLU, Democratic Socials of America, Third Act move on, hundreds more, hundreds more. Now, whether you agree with their politics or not, whether you think that what they think they're fighting, like the idea that it's like, for example, the Democrat Socials of America, I could go through forever and point out people within that that I think are dishonest or people that are, but why is the inherent opinion that because they have that belief that they're evil? and want bad things. Can you not factor it as an adult that maybe they believe that's a good thing,

Starting point is 00:33:08 that they think this is the right thing for this country? And maybe they're even wrong. I would agree that. I would say they're wrong. But it's funny how we get into this childish game where it is there that evil socialist and they want to bring the country down to its knees. It's like, okay, why would they cheer? So they want to destroy their own life? That certainly doesn't make sense. The problem is that they preying this as all or nothing all the time. Hundreds of different groups were involved. That has to matter. You can still argue it's a completely organized government propaganda sciop. I would absolutely consider that. It has to matter, though, that the way they always do it is make it some one focal, ridiculous, cartoonish, hyperbolic point. Organizers

Starting point is 00:33:48 claimed over 8 million participants across 3,300 different events in all 50 states. Now, like I said before, this could very well be because this is something that they made happen, or it could be, and we should actually, this isn't the same as me saying, for example, even though I think I know what Trump is, that I hope, I genuinely hope I'm wrong. I genuinely hope that he does everything you want because most of what you're saying, I want to happen. Maha, stuff like that. Of course, anybody genuinely wanting the better for this country should want most of those things. I'll hope for that. You see the different, but so in this case, we should be hoping that this is a genuine event of people who genuinely want to make this country, you know, genuinely want to

Starting point is 00:34:30 stop what is obviously an authoritarian, complete dictatorial direction from this government. It's not, that's not a partisan opinion. It's textbook literal definitions. But the end of the point being is that if this was possible, then we should be hoping that that is actually happening instead of just assuming that it's all one thing because this Fox News person said out loud, making it one of the largest single day protest mobilizations in U.S. history. Now, you want to look around the world, look at what's going on in our country, and not,

Starting point is 00:35:00 And tell me that you don't see an inflection point right now, a point in our history that's different than just about any other time, or at least at the level of other major events throughout history, what we're dealing with, guys, if you haven't heard, is a massive transition of our society. A genuine manipulation, the great reset, build back better, all left and right. It's the same damn thing. And you can't, it's like, it's like identical with slightly different narratives with Trump. And I guess even in his own way, trying to enshrine himself with that new future. Well, literally people acting like that's not the most obvious global agenda we've ever seen.

Starting point is 00:35:35 I just think that would be a time to see a massive record-breaking protest of people who, and here's the last thing to add to this before I stop, because I think that it's important to hear this. But I'm of the mind based on what I've seen personally and just talk to other people about, that these protests, whether you want to call it no kings or other things are on ice, are not only Democrats. In fact, far as I can tell, it seems, mostly people who are seeing through all of it.

Starting point is 00:36:03 You could probably argue, I would agree, that it slans to the left, just like during COVID, it slanted to the right because of obvious reasons, just because of who's in power. But I'm telling you, guys, right now, I believe that this is mostly people who are, it's not about left and right. It's about people that are going, okay, this is a problem. And finding a reason to stand up for it, against it. Many events were driven by other partners, community groups, ad hoc local organizers. Not every protest listed in, listed indivisible as the primary sponsor.

Starting point is 00:36:30 That certainly matters to me, doesn't it? Broader funding details. Broader funding reports describe the network of roughly 500 groups with combined annual revenues. Three billion. I want to make sure you hear that because that is not the same thing that people are reporting. Grants, union dues, individual small donations, other progressive donors.

Starting point is 00:36:51 Now, look, I'm not taking all of this at face value. Remember, my point in doing this is this is what Grock is telling you. This is what Elon is literally manipulating to the point. where it freaks out every other day. And it still says this. So take that into account. Other progressive donors, including some tied to Neville Roy, the one they were referencing a certain left-line organizations, critics, Fox News, investigations, and so on, highlight this as evidence of astroturfing, which it could be of top-down funding. While organizers framed it as broad-based, bottom-up resistance, probably some more in the middle, guys, probably a little bit of both.

Starting point is 00:37:25 But if you're an honest person, you would demand evidence for a claim, like, like that, not just, well, because they're there and that's the thing we disagree with. They've obviously, that's the level of journalism you're getting from corporate media and mainstream alternative. No public evidence shows a single pot of money from indivisible covering every local event, which I'm not even, no one's actually technically, well, I shouldn't say that. There's plenty of the ridiculous mainstream alternative media saying that, but from the main reporting, that's, but that's the, that's the insinuation, which is how this tends to go.

Starting point is 00:37:55 And it says, yeah, covering every local cost or, you know, what the signs, transportation, Many were low budget, volunteer-driven gatherings in small towns or parks. In short, Indivisible was a key national player, coordinator, which is clear for the branded elements. But the day revolved wide coalition, as read already. They did not literally fund or control every part of the country's aspect. Here is the Tennessean. No Kings protest draws huge crowds in Nashville. Another No King's protest against President Trump and his administration drew huge crowds in Nashville on Saturday.

Starting point is 00:38:27 The protest was one of thousands happening across the nation, with 40 alone in Tennessee. 40 in different locations just in Tennessee. I mean, look, I'm not going to pretend like this couldn't easily be manipulated, but think about what you're saying. So now you're telling me that apparently it was like $7 million plus, $8 million, as it said, they're all paid? Is that really what you're trying to argue right now?

Starting point is 00:38:47 That seems a little bit insane. Certainly some. I think it happens every time. But stop falling for these hyperbolic partisans, guys. And look, my opinion at this point is, I think partisan is a dirty word. I mean, genuinely, and I don't mean people that just have. have a leaning, but people who are playing the team sport game, that line's been drawn. We need to move past that and just it's these are, these are not serious people, in my opinion.

Starting point is 00:39:10 Signs decrying the war in Iran, the Epstein files, the administration's heavy immigration enforcement and cuts to education funding dominated the demonstration. So think about this. You're going to tell me you think these people are being paid by Democrats and they're out there going release the Epstein files. Aren't you the ones telling us they're the ones hiding it? See, there's easy ways to see through. this. The point is it's a mixed bag. Quote, we're here to oppose the authoritarian posturing of this administration, which has very clearly at several instances signaled that they believe they have a right to do whatever they like to do. It's true. He said, and, he said, and, quote, we're here to

Starting point is 00:39:46 protest their series of constitutional abuses. Because if you can't acknowledge that they have violated the Constitution, then you're just in child in this conversation. Because even the leading people in the MAGA team sports side of this, I shouldn't call it MAGA anymore. are the ones that are telling you. It's, we need to ignore that part of the Constitution because we have to get past this problem because that was their actual argument. So if you're coming into this going, it's not a problem, then you're just not, you just step, sit down.

Starting point is 00:40:11 You're not a part of the conversation. And it says, like ICE in our streets, abducting people with no identification, no just cause, which I can show you 15 examples for off the top of my mind. I just showed, I just showed Reese who was a U.S. veteran after Bovino lied to Derek Brose on his interview. It says, and they're actively breaking the law at every moment that, they do not release the Epstein files related to elites, elitists in the pedophile ring. So there's your Democrats, ladies and gentlemen. George Soros funded, apparently, as we're hearing for Fox,

Starting point is 00:40:41 who are telling you, they are holding back the Elstein files and they're breaking the law by not putting it out. You know, it's leading that charge, Thomas Massey, because they are breaking the law by not putting it out. Matters to me, guys. Now it says it's not the first time I know King's protests taking place in Nashville. Thousands, excuse me, gathered for a protest. at the bicentennial mall on June 2025, right? The same day as Trump's birthday in a massive military parade in Washington, D.C.

Starting point is 00:41:07 There was also no King's protest that drew a large crowd, Tennessee Capitol in October. Guess what? None of them have been violent. Sort of matters, doesn't it? With all the hype that we've been getting, that's not to say that it can't be or wouldn't be, or, you know, they're not capable of it.

Starting point is 00:41:19 It just means that there wasn't. That's the only thing it meant, and that matters. Now, the Svetlana Lokova and a lot of other people, this is what she's putting out. As I explained earlier last year, as proven by this other text that I wrote, because that makes sense. So no Kings is not organic, but it's part of a Soros element of CIA, Jake Sullivan, color revolution against President Trump, certainly possible.

Starting point is 00:41:40 Anyone that would deny that that's not possible is not serious either, because absolutely we have psychological operations, you know, color evolution dynamics. Like what we're literally seeing them try to do in Iran, guys. That's the point. So you should consider this. Now, if there's no evidence to back that up, And it's more of a patched together elements of, well, we know this wouldn't happen if this wasn't

Starting point is 00:42:03 like, you know, well, we know since Biden was seen all that means they have to. That's not intelligence, guys. That's blind self-serving assumption. So in this case, whether or not it's not organic, it should, we should care about that. Soros is an element here, but so were the other 500 plus groups that funded it all over the country. And the idea of CIA Jake Sullivan, there's no evidence here. This is just her opinion based on this idea that they all high five about, which does, it's like everything else.

Starting point is 00:42:28 It's like Nick Shirley. It's the same, same thing. This is just someone saying you're lying every day. Here is a muse account that gets things wrong constantly, by the way. We're really just about sharing whatever the current thing is and they're wrong all the time like anybody in a partisan field that blindly repeats what the team says. No Kings. But and paid for it by China apparently.

Starting point is 00:42:48 Now's China. Well, and you know, you find interesting overlaps to China in regard to funding. But guess what, guys, you probably can find funding overlaps everywhere. If you put on, something like this happens, right? If you have a massive nationwide element, there will be people that try to get involved for a thousand reasons because it's very large, because there's advertising because there's people that want to be, because it's being discussed.

Starting point is 00:43:12 So it could very well be. The whole thing was put on by China. I would never dismiss something like that. But simply seeing this graph that they put out from Fox News that shows new people's war, how money flows from Shanghai, cash from Shanghai based, Neville Roy Singham moves to step by step. Oh, okay. So this guy who wants to see communism, who showed up in protested saying, we went revolution, got funding from China. Therefore, it's all China, guys. Because don't you just see how obvious that is? Just don't, you know,

Starting point is 00:43:40 don't worry about skipping those 17 steps in between that that would necessitate verification, documents. You know what I mean? Facts. Who cares? Just jump right to whatever makes sense for the team. Now, to be clear with my facetious comments, I'm not suggesting, like I said, that I think it's not possible. I'm simply saying that this is the kind of nonsense you get from partisans who are playing a team game. As if now it's brought to you paid bore by China, these are not serious people, guys. The lives of TikTok to demonstrate that point. Oh my God, this journalist says, OMG, man claims he was paid $50 to hold a sign or no Kings protest. Follow the money that this unidentifiable anonymized screenshot.

Starting point is 00:44:24 that who knows if they even, like, for all we know, somebody sent them this, which I'm almost willing to bet you that's what happened. Do you really think Libs have blackout their name? Somebody sent them an image, in my opinion, and they just posted it because, hey, it works for what I like. Like they get, I mean, I can't even count the times that I've physically laughed out loud on this show about things that lives of TikTok got fantastically wrong. But whatever.

Starting point is 00:44:48 It means, like Matt Agarist down here says, oh, it doesn't matter. That was a different one. Actually, I'm going to get to a point where he comments underneath the, the app point we're getting to next. But it says, how much are they paying for holding signs asking for a friend? This guy says, homeless guys were given 50 bucks, facts, because I'm one of them. Oh, so we can't consider whether that might be literally lives TikTok, right? Or a Republican who wants to say it or any number of things or a homeless guy that got paid to hold a sign.

Starting point is 00:45:15 And if it was the case, why would that then mean that every other person? Because these are not real people or serious people, I mean. They're not people you should take seriously if they're willing to just. jump over a thousand unknown possibilities to what they want to think. These are people you should make fun of, even if it turns out to be the case, because she didn't know that. Remember, this is one of those people that were holding the most transparent in history redacted binders, and now she suddenly doesn't care about the Epstein files that she told

Starting point is 00:45:42 you were the most important thing in the world because Trump said, hashtag journalism, right? So Carrie Wedler says, I'd feel a lot more solidarity with the no king's protesters if they weren't salivating to pick a new master for me and everyone else during the coming election season. Exactly. After which they will retreat back into ignorance and apathy while their team rules with impunity and authoritarianism. And it all starts over again. Right?

Starting point is 00:46:08 We're just like right now. The Republicans are hiding from the team sport. I'm always clear. I make sure I am because I'm talking about every Republican. I don't think that today. I don't think it's the majority. But the team sport Republicans are hiding behind mommy skirts right now. Now, we don't want to, we don't admit, you know, Glenn Beck and Alex John,

Starting point is 00:46:26 we're, oh, he's just trying to secretly work within, trust the plan to fight through the end because there's reals bad. You know, the very thing you said wasn't going to happen. They're all just so ridiculous right now. They're drowning in their BS. The point is, just like this in reverse, you'd get the same team players on the other side that would do the same thing and then hide from it when it came to pass because that's what keeps happening.

Starting point is 00:46:46 And I don't think it's the majority, but she's right. Because many of the people out there who are protesting are not saying we want no bad, We want this person instead. And I don't agree with that. Consistency and logic and principles, guys. And we will be here the next time it comes around too. Hopefully you'll be doing this and seeing this long enough to recognize that Carrie and myself and Derek and Whitney have been consistent in this exact feeling since we started. Doesn't matter what side you're on or what presence of power.

Starting point is 00:47:11 We criticize the power structure based on what we feel is right, based on constitutes of rights, based on, you know, free movement, human principles, like the idea of not government state this perspective, but the idea that we have the right to freely move to freely exchange with one another and act beyond all of this. But the point, it's not about a side. We really need to make sure we see that today. Now on that partisan point here, I just baffles me how this can keep happening. And I mean, not necessarily anymore that I think people still fall for it.

Starting point is 00:47:49 because like I keep saying, I think this is becoming more and more obvious. I'm baffled that they keep trying this. Now, look, maybe this is the time it actually happens. I hope so, because I think Obama is a criminal. But yet again, we just made a joke about this. This is real rubber saying, here it is. A decade in the making. The United States press secretary leave it, says, quote,

Starting point is 00:48:11 now nearly 10 years later, thanks to declassification of documents and Tulsi Gabbard, Barack Obama is a criminal, and we'll go after it, blah, blah, but that's what's happening. He committed treason. That's what I'm telling you. Obama is a criminal, and he tried to overthrow the government. Okay, great.

Starting point is 00:48:33 Put him in jail. Same old story, right? I also think he's a criminal, just like all the rest of them, maybe for different reasons than he's saying, or she's saying, I think they're criminals and should be arrested. Now, watch as nothing happens. I don't understand how many times this can happen, or they can get up and go, oh, the thing, and Obama is a close.

Starting point is 00:48:50 He's going down over and over and over and over before, and nothing happens before people like this, real Robert and the rest, start calling that out. How many times? I guess at least one more. Now, like I said, maybe this will change. In fact, part of me, I didn't even look because I bet you this is an old clip. I'm going to bet you this is like the other one I just showed you, which is from 2025. But even if it's not, it's almost worse because she stood up and she made the case yet again,

Starting point is 00:49:15 probably because they're drowning in their lives. If Obama had been found, this is evidence that Pulsie Gabbard put forward last year. Are you going to tell me they wouldn't have arrested him if it's the same information you're putting forward again? Why would they have waited? What's the point? I mean, if they wanted a distraction, good God, arrest Obama,

Starting point is 00:49:33 that would change the entire conversation. Watch as nothing happens. And I hope it does. So if it does, don't be coming. I told you. I hope it does. I'll high five you as well. I just don't believe it.

Starting point is 00:49:47 And this is just somebody, Healthish Haven, basically just in case you want to read it, said here's a breakdown of why they're lying. Yeah, it's just their opinion about what she said and why it's wrong. You can watch for yourself. Former Congressman Marketerlin-Chille Green says Thomas Massey is right. He completely ratioed the White House,

Starting point is 00:50:06 which is just them, I guess, thinking they're funny and making fun of, I don't even know what to try to do here. Curious how American farmers are benefiting right now. They don't, they're not. or exactly how much each state saved only farms delivering for farmer like they're making fun of only fans or rather making fun of farmers

Starting point is 00:50:24 and comparing it to a porn site. I mean like what happens if you click on that? I don't know. There's been some weird stuff coming from them. Right now my advice to you would be not to engage or click on anything they're doing. Their weird little glitchy videos with sound in the background.

Starting point is 00:50:38 They're who God only knows what they're trying to do. But Massey says, can you arrest Epstein's co-inspirators and co-conspirators instead of riffing on a porn site? Yeah, exactly. And look, this is the White House, guys, the White House. This is 4 million followers.

Starting point is 00:50:56 Donald Trump's influence. And he gets wildly ratioed. I mean, what's interesting, look at the views. That's 1.7. This is 4. Or 11 million views. Look at that. So with a fraction of the views,

Starting point is 00:51:13 he gets a tremendous, more engaged. engagement with, you know, knowing it's altered to manipulate on this platform. If you're taking a face value, it simply means that even their supporters agree with Massey more than him. But, you know, you can't really discern that today because of how broken this platform is. But interesting. And she says Thomas Massey is right, which is wise comment ratioed the White House gross post comparing farmers to porn stars. This administration was elected by conservatives who are opposed to porn, rapists, pedophiles, you get protect Epstein class, pedos and rapists. You know, I find it hard to believe that you could just broadly say.

Starting point is 00:51:45 say that everyone in Republicans are against poor rapist and pedophiles? Clearly not, by the way, but, you know, I agree with the general sentiment. Here's another quick point on partisanship that I just think is just, it just speaks to the dishonesty of all this. You tell me what you think. Here's what RFK Jr. just said.

Starting point is 00:52:03 He has an encyclopedic. He's talking about Trump. He has an encyclopedic molecular knowledge on these this wide range of very very eclectic interest music Broadway shows pro wrestling football in every sport golf and and you know and business in Wall Street he knows how everybody made their money and what deals they made and he tells stories all the time about it it's just one after the other and one time I was during the campaign I was

Starting point is 00:52:48 on the airplane with them and we were sitting across the table from each other eating McDonald's breaking diet coat and um yeah always he we started talking about Syria and he got a a place mad and he turned it on its back and then he took a sharpie and he drew a perfect map of the middies and then he put the troop strength of every country on every border on that map and it just it challenged a lot of the assumptions that I had been told about him he has you know he has this extraordinary depth of knowledge about what's happening in each one of the agencies my agency and the others and you know and then he has an instinct or making good choices well I have

Starting point is 00:53:47 Okay. Well, you can clearly, I mean, you know, the instinct for making good choices, well, that speaks for itself. I guess that depends on what you think he's driving his choices. You know, it's funny, a man can sit there who is now supporting many things that he has aggressively fought against and tell me he's making good choices, kind of feels hard to swallow. But simple point. And this is a small thing. Like this is not, this is just about, you know, about the kind of things they're willing to lie about. I simply said, you can call this Trump Drainism Syndrome, despite my criticism of both sides of this broken government, I simply do not believe this based on countless examples of ignorance and countless examples of dishonesty.

Starting point is 00:54:28 First of all, I just do not believe, period, that he could just flip over a map and draw the Middle East. I mean, guys, I know people that do this every day who can't do that. Trump has demonstrated countless times. It's my opinion entirely. It's not even worth, really, it's more for me getting into the idea of whether or not or not in a general sense, do you think they would float something like that? Hypothetically speaking, if it wasn't true and why you think they would do that.

Starting point is 00:54:55 It's kind of a thought experiment. You know, the idea being, you know, we're clearly at this interesting point where I think they're more exposed than ever. I think they're the people, they're losing support more than ever. And so I think we're in this like cartoonish propaganda phase where it's just, the idea is just to kind of just put out everything they can. I mean, look at what Tulsi Gabbard has said. Look what he has said.

Starting point is 00:55:18 Things that you know, at least at least their entire career before Trump, they aggressively disagreed with and suddenly now they support it. I just, we must know by now that these people are being dishonest in plenty of ways, whether this is one of them or not. I personally, I just don't believe that. I think there's evident that this person is not even remotely there. Now, Trump is savvy in plenty of ways. Okay, maybe, maybe you could argue he knows that troop locations or like maybe like numbers

Starting point is 00:55:44 or maybe I can see that. But him being able to draw out that map, I just don't believe it. He can barely recall these names half the time. I just think that's crazy. And it speaks to what they're willing to lie about. Now, one little quick thing on the interesting point of this at the end, I happen to see this. I won't even get into why.

Starting point is 00:55:59 It was kind of funny that this got shut, you know, anyway, it doesn't matter because it was basically something I was asking Grock and it randomly asked, it was one of those chats I was showing you. And I asked something without, I forgot to put the link in. And it responded with this. And I was, I was just like, show me the contradiction. in, you know, with something. And it responded with this saying, well, here, T-Lav is not as super biased.

Starting point is 00:56:19 I was like, okay, that's interesting. Why would that be where, you know, it's just weird. There's so, this, this platform is being aggressively gamed, guys. I just thought that means that this, that was literally thinking about how bias I, thinks I am while it was, I didn't even ask, I just think it's hilarious. But here's what I thought was interesting. For an inside joke for us with, especially with what we were just covering, right? I remember what looking at the same ridiculous means,

Starting point is 00:56:44 the EBIase fact check platform where it had me somewhere like right here a long time ago, not that I care. But what's funny is you know what we've done. You know how long, you know, the effort that we take to source things to make it factually provable and then opinions. And yet it literally in regard to the bias being extreme, right? And guess what side that says for the right? You got to love that, right?

Starting point is 00:57:09 So right now, apparently I'm extremely biased toward the right. You want to you want to you want to jive that with the real world for me and it's say guess what the reasoning for this discussion because apparently I only talk a propaganda conspiracy pseudoscience like directly from the peer viewed science apparently poor sourcing you got to love that one lack of transparency. Let me guys this is not even connected to what I'm doing. This is just a you know I mean I'm sure there are people out there who don't you know hate me for one reason or another who would try to disagree with that. But you can't be honest and tell me that I poor sourcing. You mean aside from sourcing literally everything that I point to? Look, you could argue that it's too much maybe. But that's not what poor sourcing means.

Starting point is 00:57:54 Lack of transparency. Guys, I've got as transparent as you can get on this platform. But you all know this, though. That's what's funny to me. And failed fact checks because what they say that, you know, I just think it's hilarious. The main point for me, though, is that I'm apparently, this should speak enough. Right now I'm being called a lefty by the right, just like I was called a righty during COVID by the left.

Starting point is 00:58:13 You know, but yet you're consistent calling out both sides. Just right. I just thought that was hilarious. But anyway, moving on to the main point of today. First, from a technocratic perspective, I just want to point this out. This person, I poke smart on the, on YouTube channel, said that the video, they were trying to access. And mine, I guess, in general, is being geo-blocked, which is seemingly becoming more and more prevalent today. They had to set up their VPN and suddenly it worked.

Starting point is 00:58:41 And this is on YouTube with a random video. Why wouldn't they just censor me? You know, I think we're getting into a different phase of this. That's what I've been talking about for a while. This has changed. But very interesting because it is definitely happening. And whether this is the case or not here, it is happening in a general sense. And I think we all see that.

Starting point is 00:58:57 Now, I wanted to put this in your mind again. Just, I mean, whether this is somewhat connected, but just I saw this and went, oh, my God, think about this with where we currently are. This was in June 19, 2025. This was when the U.S. government initiated Detachment 201. Actually, let me see if I can get that to come up. I believe I can. I'll just search for it.

Starting point is 00:59:25 I'm sure it'll come up. Here we go. Army launches Detachment 201. Executive Innovation Corps to Drive Tech Transformation. Now, remember what Hegset just did. He just removed the regalia from, I think it was, chaplains, right? From which I thought was interesting at the time.

Starting point is 00:59:45 I don't see how it makes sense. They're military like anybody else is, right? What's weird to me, and this just brought this to mind. Remember what this was. And this is an actual picture, guys. This is, this is Palantir, meta, and I believe it was open AI, remember correctly? And they got sworn to the military. Now what Brad Miller told me, these people were given

Starting point is 01:00:05 colonel status, I believe. And these are people were one step below the highest, level. They didn't go through any training. They didn't go through any military. These were these were the CTOs of meta and Palantir who were given that level of authority in the military. And what he said is realize you've got people in the military that are medical, for example, or other elements that are not, you know, they're military, but they don't actually wear the garb. They're actually get the regalia. It's a separate, it's a civilian role in the military. So ask yourself, why did they not give these people civilian roles? Why did they

Starting point is 01:00:38 give Palantir and Meta and other AI companies, why did they give them high level super influential military positions? And as Brad told me, that means they can quite literally command anybody underneath them, whether or not, whether or not they're in their tech side of this or, you know, their actual leaders in the military now. I don't know, this should have been a wildly influential story. It got little coverage, as I called it, technocracy in uniform. That's literally what this was. Now think about at the time, you know, people kind of brushed it off. Look at where we are. You know, as Jones will tell you, this little Democrat thing, the Democrats hate Palantir. It's a small thing. Yeah, that's a lie. It was a lie then. It's even more obviously of a lie now.

Starting point is 01:01:20 It's gigantic. It's over UK elements, military. They just adopted volunteers AI for the core military use in this country. And we're going to get into the overlap of the spyware from the from the ice elements and everything else. But just think about how alarming that is that these people, are at the highest levels. I mean, this is a coup in sorts. And I don't know why we can't acknowledge that, guys. I mean, I think I know why it's not being allowed to be acknowledged. It's taking place right now. But keep this in mind that it'll only become more relevant as more and more of these kind of things become positions of influential power. Now, let's start. Oh, yeah, this is, well, realize that Palantir has a strategic partnership with Israel, which is just

Starting point is 01:02:02 important to include. You'll see why. Now, the phone element, of this, I thought were very interesting. Now, remember, remember what we were getting these kind of floated out? And this is, I think, very relevant to where this is. Blackwater, Eric Prince, and here's a new freedom phone, or what did he call it, the unplugged phone. The article here says, Blackwater's founder would like you to sell you a privacy phone made the U.S. The updated up phone, which was an unplugged phone, will eventually be made in the U.S., but it isn't yet. Oh, that's interesting. I wonder why. Phones are currently made in Indonesia. Okay, so we got, I lied to, right? that was the earliest part of this,

Starting point is 01:02:39 and it was very clearly shown to have some alarming surveillance elements. And the lie was this was sort of like the phone marketed to MAGA, right? And myself and plenty of others were like, okay, well, there's very, very unnerving connections to multiple things. Eric Prince wants to sell you a secure smartphone

Starting point is 01:02:57 that's too good to be true. Well, they tried to tell you it was Indonesia, right? Well, here was the reality when you dig beyond the surface level. Corporate framing. Unplugs day-to-day technology operations are run by Iran Kaepern, a former employee of Communitake, the Israeli startup that gave rise to the now infamous hacker group, the NSO Group. Weird.

Starting point is 01:03:20 He's also a veteran of Israel's unit 8200, an agency that conducts cyber espionage and is the country's equivalent of the NSA. So, yeah, maybe Iran Indonesia, but it's an Israeli company that was literally gave rise to the infamous NSO group. Pegas's software, Paragon, so that's what we're talking about. And so this is an important thing to think about, that it goes back to even the first phone that Eric Prince was trying to huck at people. And this was coming from Israel's connection. That's important.

Starting point is 01:03:52 Then, when that very clearly got pushed to the side, because that wasn't what people wanted to hear, Magaphone, right? We got Trump's new special phone. But what happened to that? Oh, that's right. It also fell down because they also lied to you. Weird how we can't learn our lessons here.

Starting point is 01:04:06 Maga's World Freedom Phone. actually budget Chinese phone. And I could get into it like I did before. There's clear connections that you could tie back to plenty of things, including Israel. But the point for me is not necessarily one of the other, but just that they're lying to you. They're selling you something that will sell you. They will sell your data. They will spy on you.

Starting point is 01:04:25 It's been the same point every single time. I called it out then. So keeping that in mind that they were already trying to kind of huck these things at you. And both of them had connections to their alarming spyware elements that went. right back to the NSO group? Well, welcome to the White House app. Launch the White House app. Live streams, real-time updates,

Starting point is 01:04:46 straight from the source, no filter, except absolutely lots of filters. Even Twitter called this out. The promoted White House app tracks users' precise location every 4.5 minutes via third party one signal, sinking coordinates to external servers despite no filter claims.

Starting point is 01:05:06 They're lying, guys. or I guess the question is either they're lying to you or the question is, did somebody lie to them? And if somebody lied to them, that means that somebody, a lot of people, as one of these articles point out, didn't do their due diligence or didn't care. It's certainly possible that Trump has no idea that this has been manipulated and somebody else is spying on American citizens.

Starting point is 01:05:26 Or it could just be that our tri-national security state is spying on us and it's Israel, the United States, the UK, and everybody else, or whatever you want to look at it as. The point is, this is spyware. There's really no way around it. And if we can't turn around and acknowledge this, we're, I mean, I think about if this goes forward and nothing, if this doesn't become a general conversation on the highest level of the media, then we are completely overtaken.

Starting point is 01:05:51 Whatever you think that means, you can take China if you want. My point is just that at some level, we have to acknowledge that something like this, not getting discussed at the highest levels of left, right media outside of the independent, there's no denying what that shows you, because this is incredibly important. So even the Libertarian Party, Tennessee, called this out, and they simply said, the new White House app is literally spyware. So this is not being missed on anybody, guys. This has been broadly acknowledged. It's important to make sure that we discuss.

Starting point is 01:06:20 This is just what you could look up for yourself on, you know, the app permissions. And it just goes over the stuff we're going to talk about in a second. Precise location, modify, delete the contents of your shared storage. Like, absorb that for a second. Nobody does this, guys. they're giving themselves access to remove content from your storage. I'm sure you can piece together why that would be needed or wanted. And I'm not even making this about one group.

Starting point is 01:06:47 Your government has every needed reason to remove content they don't want you seeing. Run foreground service. This app can appear on top of other apps, run its startup. Like so it starts up when your phone starts up, right? Google App Play. I mean, we'll go through this in more in depth. Biometric hardware. this person just made this, you know, your White House app, all your photos,

Starting point is 01:07:09 livesrooms events shared with Israel. Now that's the joke, really, the people are kind of, because it's funny, how obvious that connection is. And so people are now making a joke about it. But it's not much of a joke because really there is a connection. But it's not as simple as saying this is Israel's connection, right? But here's my thing, or rather Israel's app, which I'm not saying. I mean, I'm going to show you where I think all of this overlaps.

Starting point is 01:07:31 So hypothetically speaking, whoever made this app that the governments have access to what it shows there so Israel does too. I'm going to show you what this means, but you could very well argue that the actual entire thing is run by kind of the coordination of all of them. But realize how alarming this truly is and what this means that they're willing to put this out and not care, like, and lie to you about it and then just not care that you see it. Now, I'm going to include a couple of really good articles here that I think are tech, some of our little tech focused, which is, you know, like it gets super tech heavy.

Starting point is 01:08:11 it can be more, you know, a lot of it's even above my head. But this is, or just not even. I'm not that I'm not that worst, well versed on it. Security analysts analysis, excuse me, of the official White House iOS app. This was from March 27th. Now, this is, you read through this. It's just good because it gives you a lot of the technical information. Like if you're more on that side of things, this will give you more of the out,

Starting point is 01:08:32 like the written out code and dynamics of how this is actually working. I'll include all these so you can go through it. I'm going to go to just the main two, the one, this one listed off, and this one will go through it in a much more easily digestible point. But same kind of thing. This one is a lot more in depth. And this is I decompiled the White House's new app. Here's just some of the overview points they make.

Starting point is 01:08:54 One, injects JavaScript into every website you open. Though it's in-app browser or through its in-app browser to hide cookie consent dialogues. Like that's a decision, guys. J-DPR, banners, log. log-in walls, sign-up walls, up-sell prompts, and paywalls, has a full GPS tracking pipeline. Why would they even need that? Compiled in that pulls every 4.5 minutes in the foreground and 9.5 minutes in the background, sinking latitude, longitude, accuracy, timestamp to one-signal servers.

Starting point is 01:09:34 And there's a reason that's super alarming as well, seeing us how those servers can ultimately open a, it opens you to vulnerability. Loads JavaScript from the random person's GitHub page sites. For YouTube embeds, if that account is compromised, arbitrary code runs in the app's web view. Load third party JavaScript from Elf site for social media widgets with no sandboxing. Sends email addresses to MailChimp.

Starting point is 01:09:58 Images are reserved from upload care and a true social embed is hardcoreed with static CDN URLs. None of this is governed government infrastructure. So that alone, some of this even right here might be above someone said. We'll get into the easy understanding part next. The idea that it's not run a government infrastructure, guys, this is exactly what I'm talking about. This is getting way outside. Like, you could talk about this in the overlap of like the network state direction. You could talk about this in some sort of a coup foreign power thing.

Starting point is 01:10:29 Or you can just realize that we're talking about some kind of public-private partnership blending where this becomes something that, one, puts, makes you less secure, but too also allows you where you have no access to any of you can see what they have this is this is bad everyone people there's plenty of experts that are in the field of this very you know of this exact field and are saying i mean i'll get jumping ahead a bit or read are telling you this is like no one does this people do parts of this in certain lobe you know and and then get called out for it for them to come out and basically just dump this whole thing this is like this is a spyware app it's what it is and they just didn't think you'd see it or didn't care

Starting point is 01:11:06 PINning, standard Android trust management, ships with dev artifacts in production, a local host URL, the Expo Dev client, and an exported compost preview activity, profile users extensively through one signal. So here is breakdown of this. The White House app is spyware with a Gov badge. So it says every cybersecurity class I've ever sat through hammered the same thing into our heads. Ethics. Now, whether that's what the industry demonstrates, I do.

Starting point is 01:11:36 agree this is something that we you know they love to even in the industry right they they all like government comes out we'll never take your data and they always do like clockwork we won't sell it and then they get sell it like with COVID information they all did it guys but they speak they claim ethics right difference with this administration they just don't care anymore no ethics pledges don't forget that that matters there was a point at which it was monumentally important there's no one seemed to care now that had to do with the israel influence i might as well grab it since we're bringing it up. All this matters. I mean, I was actually blown away why this didn't become a bigger topic. Trump admins missing ethics pledges. As somebody involved with it literally said,

Starting point is 01:12:15 that means foreign element, foreign governments could literally influence this and we wouldn't know. I said, well, that's exactly the point, isn't it? And weird how nobody seemed to care outside of you guys. Responsible disclosure. Ethics. Don't touch what you don't have permission to touch. Don't intercept traffic. Don't inject code into systems. You don't own don't collect data without consent. Now what's the difference with Trump and they they believe, as they clearly tell you, they could do whatever they want. Right. You can just, you know, you know, the hubris is clear, but the idea like, what was the example? Oh, like Ecuador, for example, or you know, they just went and used their location anyway, even though they said no.

Starting point is 01:12:58 Trump just clearly thinks he can do whatever he wants. It's very clear. He's made a statement. So this case, collecting data or dumping code. It says, well, they did it and they are doing it. I guarantee there's going to be platforms out there that have a real problem with this and probably blacklist the app. But I doubt that stops it for being on the app store. And then the White House ships an app that does all of that. So he's saying every class I ever took stress that these things can never happen. And then the White House releases an app that does every one of them. The Trump White House launched an official mobile app on March 28.

Starting point is 01:13:31 They called it unparalleled access to the Trump administration. A security researcher who goes by their LO pulled the APK, threw it into JADX, and decompiled the entire thing. Both those first two were showing you most of that. What they found would get any cybersecurity student expelled, any pen tester fired, and any company sued. But it's stamped with dot-gov badge, so apparently it's fine. This is not a political article. This is a technical audit of a government application that violates every principle the cybersecurity industry teaches. Every standard the federal government is supposed to uphold.

Starting point is 01:14:13 Every ethical boundary we are told never to cross. I'm calling out everyone responsible. You see, I hope you can see why this has parallels to well beyond this one talking point. That they would just do this, right? The idea that they, not just one, but literally just choose to break every possible. and it's not about rules. It's about the idea that you're invasively manipulating these people. Half these people that jumped right into that didn't even check because they think they can trust you.

Starting point is 01:14:40 And you're now spying on them. You're absorbing their information. And so too are every other group they're working with, whether the companies or foreign governments involved with them too. Who built this? And it goes on to point out the, well, first of all, says the app was built by an entity called 44 press or 45 press, according to Expo configuration. Now, what's interesting to me on top of that, is, apparently this is a group that didn't exist before this. Brings very similar to Nome's company that they just funded for something that,

Starting point is 01:15:09 you know, there's no building, there's no place. Same kind of idea we'll get to in a second, which I think speaks volumes. Finding one GPS tracking pipeline, your location every 4.5 minutes. Speaks for itself, guys.

Starting point is 01:15:23 Why in the world they would need that to give updates about what's going on the White House? They don't, guys. This is surveillance, tracking, data mining, right? Trump learned that from Cambridge Analytica, the reality of what he gained from using that on social media to manipulate the audiences. That's what our government does. Every 4.5 minutes, they're watching you. And a point is it goes on. And, you know, of course, uses Google's location API because Google's the good guy, right, Republicans?

Starting point is 01:15:50 Isn't Google totally not the globalist deep state point that we were making before Trump was in power? Oh, maybe I'm getting confused. Maybe I mixed those up. You know, Google and BlackRock and Gates, right? They're the good guys now, or am I missing the boat here? And, you know, plenty of other, they're spying on you guys, and they're tracking your location. Can you imagine if that was a Biden app? A White House app when Biden was in power.

Starting point is 01:16:13 It would be a biggest deal in the century to certain one-sided players. It does matter, and it is a big deal, no matter who does it. Number two, JavaScript, injection into every website you visit. Now, I'm not even sure if I grasp what the bigger point of what that may mean. every time you open a link inside of an app, every time it opens in a built-in web viewer browser. Before you, you know, look, you understand, guys, this is everything.

Starting point is 01:16:41 So you download this app. Every time you open a link inside this app, inside the White House app, it opens in a built-in web view browser. Now what I'm going to get into, I've jumped slightly ahead there, is that what this is about your phone as well and what's going on in your phone.

Starting point is 01:16:57 This part specifically is with, in that. My point, though, is it still. So you're in this app. You hit a link. It then opens a built-in web view browser outside of the app, okay? Or in it, but it's in now extension beyond it. You're now, you're online, right? Before you see anything, the app injects a JavaScript payload into the page. Now, again, that's what we were saying earlier. You're talking about a page that's not owned by this app. This is, you're injecting code into whatever you then view through that browser. It hides. Anywhere you then go from that, guys, it hides. Cookie consent banners, GDPR consent dialogues, one trust pop-ups, privacy banners, login walls, sign-up walls,

Starting point is 01:17:41 upsell prompts, paywall elements, consent management platforms. Then it deploys a mutation observer, a persistent DOM watcher that continuously monitor. the page and re-hides any consent elements that get dynamically added after initial load. The injector doesn't just fire once. It fights back against the sites that try to re-display their consent dialogues. So now, hypothetically, if this browser wants to bump you into some other thing, you know, or promotes another website that I don't know is completely designed to steal everything from your phone, well, you wouldn't even notice that it was saying consent here.

Starting point is 01:18:20 It would jump right past that. That seems very organized to me. and I'm sure you could think of other ways that could be abused, or ways that are probably just alarming whether or not it's abused. This runs on every single page load in the web view, every link you tap. Now, I'm willing to bet you that people will probably start, and this is almost designed to get you to start using this in general. Let me be explicit about what this means, the person writes.

Starting point is 01:18:44 A United States government application is injecting code into third-party websites to, one, strip your right to consent, to tracking. Very clear. That's very manipulative. And you're talking about people who are, you know, the Bitcoin community who are very, they matters to them. And it should about anonymity, about consent to tracking what you're doing. And they're literally tricking you into hiding that, into consenting without knowing it. Two, to bypass authentication barriers, login walls, which I mean, the way I'm reading this is this can work in other ways, I would argue, through you. And it says circumvent paid content gates, paywall, bypass, potential CFAA

Starting point is 01:19:28 and DMCA implications, enable silent third party track it. Every tracker on every site fires without restriction because the consent gate was removed. See the point? So things that would otherwise say consent here to track on your phone wouldn't show and it would just instantly start happening. I mean, that's just vil. That's vicious. That's, that's, that's, that's, And that's deliberately manipulative for their benefit at your expense. If you can't come to terms with this, you don't care what's going on. These people are using you or somebody's using you through them. I mean, ask yourself why they would need to silently turn off your own consent.

Starting point is 01:20:10 Think about that in any other context. You know, wear a mask. You don't get to time in. You do it anyway. Take this thing. No consent allowed. You know, it's obviously a different circumstance. But it's the point about consent.

Starting point is 01:20:20 It's your choice to consent or not. They don't get to bypass that because you signed on to something they did without telling you. It's the same point. This is not a library default, he writes. This is not a leftover. Someone hand wrote a 12 pattern CSS injector with a mutation observer, meaning in case you missed that. This was very deliberately hands written into the code to ensure the things they just listed off.

Starting point is 01:20:47 That's why it's very, I mean, whether it was deliberate, it's spyware. But the point is that they literally, made sure they wrote in the spyware elements so they could spy on you. The irony, the app that profiles one through, profiles you through one signal, is also stripping consent dialogues that would let you opt out of tracking on other sites. That's why I want to focus on this. This is insane. Loading code from random persons GitHub pages.

Starting point is 01:21:16 That's a personal GitHub page site. I'm curious who's, by the way, belonging to an individual. individual developer. If that GitHub account gets compromised, which is certainly possible, whoever controls it can serve arbitrary HTML and JavaScript to every single user of the White House app, which I'm sure is already millions. Crazily enough. Executing inside, yes, you guessed it, the WebView context.

Starting point is 01:21:42 So they could, if it just creates a very ridiculous security potential, you know, like a vulnerability. But it says, but a dot-gov application. should have caught this in the security review. The fact that they didn't catch it tells you there wasn't one, or they don't care, I would add. Number four, more third-party code execution. The app also loads JavaScript from Elth site. Now, I also want to go back.

Starting point is 01:22:07 I mean, who knows if it ends up happening because, you know, new things happen every day, but I did make a note. I want to go back and go through these individual companies and their own different things. I did briefly look at each one, but, you know, sometimes you can look at these things for hours and only, you know, eventually stumble across something

Starting point is 01:22:21 because of how manipulative things are today. A commercial S-A-AS widget company, ElfSite, and it says this code runs inside the web view with no sandboxing. Whatever tracking ElfSight does, it does inside this government app, their code can change at any time without the app being updated. I mean, that alone should be enough for you to stop using this. That means they could literally do whatever they want. They could add anything tomorrow,

Starting point is 01:22:49 and you wouldn't even know, and you've already at least consented. I mean, who knows if there's even a consent when you open this thing, or at least no longer going forward. But what it means is whether you consent it or not, once you begin to use this tomorrow, they can suddenly say, we're going to steal your banking information. You may think that's not possible, but they could do.

Starting point is 01:23:05 Well, let me go ahead and say that whether that might not be possible technologically, because I'm not going to say on the expert on this, but nonetheless, they could change their code at any time without you being noticed of that or you noticing that. So you could, whatever the experts are tell you, change your code to do this malicious thing and you wouldn't know i would argue that could effectively be something that could siphon information for your phone why couldn't that be making information but i'm not the expert the end of the day how is that something anybody would be okay with guys would you

Starting point is 01:23:35 be okay if that was biden or anybody other than it's just wild your data goes everywhere it says except the government this is finding number five here's where your data actually goes when you use this official U.S. government app. One signal, MailChimp, upload care, elf site, truth, social, Facebook, lonely, none of these are government-controlled infrastructure. Not one. So now you're vulnerable because of these.

Starting point is 01:24:09 But many, the most of these companies are, you know, big companies. But it's just this, this is wild to me how this is sort of being pushed off. And I'm willing to bet you it overlaps with these in their own way, too. I mean, Facebook. Does that not matter? I mean, meta is part of this whole thing. And meta was one of the people that censored you for talking about COVID shots. Does it not matter that Facebook is now part of this?

Starting point is 01:24:31 It should. You guys are the ones telling us, and I agree that he should be somebody going to jail. Now he's Trump's right-hand man when it comes to technology, apparently. He's in the new science advisory group, guys. Number six, one signal user profiling way beyond push notifications. One signal isn't just sending push notifications. The full profiling toolkit is compiled in everything, really. I mean, it's just the ones that'll stand out.

Starting point is 01:25:00 Notification lifecycle tracking. Every notification received, opened or dismissed is logged. Every single one. Track user actions and conversations. Cross-device user identification. Associate phone numbers with user profiles. permission changes, subscription changes, user state changes, all of this. You know, I just honestly, I run over this earlier.

Starting point is 01:25:27 I'm just like, I can't believe this is so clear. No certificate pinning. Now, this one's wild to me coming from somebody running the website, running a website, understanding how important this is. The app uses standard Android trust manager for SSL with no custom certificate. If you're on a corporate network, public Wi-Fi, or any network with a compromise, CA, all traffic between the app and its backends can be intercepted and read. For a government app that handles citizen data, no penny.

Starting point is 01:25:58 Meaning it's just, I honestly think this is set up in order to be taken. Like you keep an opening for that to be the reality. It's important. Now, I very well, I'm sure this person isn't referring to me, but it's worth pointing out, like somebody mentions the word paranoid in the chat. you certainly i mean you could argue this is unnecessarily concerned but realize most everything that worries me are things that are not hypothetical are things that are literally doing things that you can quite literally see that in and of themselves are enough i mean are frankly

Starting point is 01:26:34 criminal guys if it was done by anybody in the government it would be criminal it should be anyway now i i get out but i think they're probably talking to someone else in the chat but it's worth considering that somebody rightly would look at all this and go oh you guys are conspiracy there. Oh, you're crazy. Remember, this is not even like a political, this is a technical overview of what they're doing. Number eight, development, artifacts in production. Number nine, entire external storage exposed. It says the file provider configuration exposes the entire external storage route. The web view, the same web view running the consent bypass injector and loading unvetted third-party JavaScript from random GitHub accounts has access to

Starting point is 01:27:15 your entire external storage through this file provider. Now, this is so much more to me, guys. If they have access to your storage, your external storage, meaning not in the app, they have access to everything as far as I'm concerned. Everything on your phone, which then, are you argue, sort of retroactively means that earlier things we discussed would be able to somewhat access anything and siphon anything. But it says, who failed here?

Starting point is 01:27:44 I mean, just before we get past that. And we briefly read this on another one as well, but the idea of being able to remove, delete, add, like, okay, now what if we're talking about being able to have things added to your external storage on your phone, your computer, then suddenly you're raided and you have child pornography, you know, whatever.

Starting point is 01:28:03 We talk about this often, about people being set up in this way. This is why it's important to be as secure as you can, but realize that this is the world we're waiting into, guys. and if we know what Israel's been capable of or what the U.S. government or the U.K. have been, how they have done before, we should worry if this is being set up.

Starting point is 01:28:22 That's where you should run screaming. Don't even get close to this app. Who failed here? He says, let me name names. 45 press. The developer entity that built the app, you shipped a government application with GPS tracking,

Starting point is 01:28:38 code injection, no certificate pinning, dev artifacts in production, and third-party code loaded from a personal GitHub. This is amateur hour, they wrote. A first year computer science student would know better. CESA, cybersecurity, infrastructure security agencies, CESA, of all groups. You are the federal agency responsible for cybersecurity.

Starting point is 01:28:59 You manage the dot-gov domain. The DMARC records on aliens.gov route to dmARC.C. Cyber.ddddddd-DHS.gov. You're actively managing federal domain security, but you let this slip. or you let this app ship, excuse me. It says, where was the security review? Where was the code audit? Where was the FedRamp authorization?

Starting point is 01:29:22 An official government app is injecting JavaScript in a third-party websites, loading code from random GitHub accounts, and routing citizen data through five private companies. And CESA had nothing to say about it? I don't buy it, guys. I don't buy it. Cisa, we've talked about this

Starting point is 01:29:38 in the manipulative elements of the whole way it's used. But the point is, if this was genuine, in it was about protecting our cybersecurity. This is like the, I guess the gold standard of the bad things you should do. If there was something that CISA would ever stop, it would be exactly what we just talked about. If they cared about this and if it was about something, you know, not if it was a, let's put it this way, not a government plan or a government agenda.

Starting point is 01:30:04 That's how I see this. I don't understand. I mean, I don't even know why I should even need to qualify that. They put the app out. How else would you read this? The White House Digital Team. You commissioned this app and called it unparalleled access to Trump administration. What you delivered is unparalleled access to your user's location.

Starting point is 01:30:20 Browsers behavior, notification interactions, the device identifiers, all flowing to private companies, meaning the other companies have access to this stuff too. You knew about the location issue. You wrote a plug in called no location. It didn't work. Did anyone check?

Starting point is 01:30:36 One signal. Your SDK ships with a full location tracking. module that survives Expo plugins designed to strip it. When government apps include your SDK for push notifications, they get GPS tracking as a bonus. Your documentation should make this crystal clear, but they either didn't know it was there or they lied to you, probably a little bit of both. The combined picture, an app that tracks your GPS every 4.5 minutes, that strips your ability to consent to tracking on other websites, that loads and executes code from unbedded

Starting point is 01:31:10 third-party sources that routes all of your data through private companies that exposes your entire storage on your phone and other external devices depending on what you're on to webview. Your entire storage that has no certificate pinning at SSL. That ships with dev artifacts still in the binary. That's not a news app. That's a spyware wearing a dot-gov badge. Whether this is intentional surveillance or catastrophic negligence, the outcome for users is the same. The code is in the binary. The pipeline is built. The data flows to private servers.

Starting point is 01:31:49 You see what that is, guys? The White House has not publicly responded to these technical findings. This came out two days ago. Are you serious? I mean, just that last part of this, with everything you just said, that ultimately this is a pipeline. And the data is flowing to five private servers we can't verify. on top of all of that, just to put the absurdity on top of everything,

Starting point is 01:32:12 Huawei tracking infrastructure. Now, I have to say, my gut, which could just be, you know, in my opinion, is that this was almost done in order to like a red, like a red herring. Like, in order to get you to look away

Starting point is 01:32:25 from what all of this points to, it says independent analysis by sambent.com confirmed the app ships with three embedded trackers including Huawei Mobile Services Corps? And it says, yes, the same Chinese company that the U.S. government sanctioned and banned from federal networks is shipping, tracking infrastructure inside the sitting president's official app.

Starting point is 01:32:51 You can't make this up. That's insane. And so what's even weirder unless I've missed it is why haven't the Democrats called this out? Telling you guys, I mean, maybe they will. because honestly, I think that's the plan. I think that's meant to sort of be the red herring to the bigger picture here. But what are we doing?

Starting point is 01:33:09 How in the world can this not be the biggest story right now? At least in this country, right, with what's happening. And of course, here's lives at TikTok. Apple is hiding the new app store, White House App Store. Look how long you have the scroll to find it when searching for it. Look at this. Audiences for what, new apps at the Apple store could take up to 72 hours to correctly appear. Well, guess what?

Starting point is 01:33:31 Right? when they posted this, I looked and it was literally number one. Literally the number one app. On my opinion, because I think we all know what these ridiculous partisan platforms do, they're trying to go, oh yeah, I'm going to look and then probably they're driving you to go look at the app because that's what these absurd platforms do. Because she just scrolled way down and shows it down there. I don't believe it.

Starting point is 01:33:52 But either way, it says up there that it's, you know, take, should take a second, but they want people to go look at it. Now, don't you think these platforms would be? be the first to scream or these accounts if this was in any way Democrat associated. But they wouldn't even need evidence, guys. They would need Trump insinuating and they would all scream it as fact for the next year. That's who these people are, just the same on the other side of the paradigm. So before we get into some other points about this connection, and what I want to make sure

Starting point is 01:34:23 is clear, even though I know I'm going to make a connection, that these are two separate stories. Okay. That concludes the first part of that conversation. the obvious and undeniable concern of what we just highlighted. Now, let's talk about the bigger picture of spyware. And Israel's overlap with that as it pertains to the U.S. government and specifically Trump. Now, going back to 2017, I want to show you the long-term discussion we've been having

Starting point is 01:34:47 specifically about, in this case, NSO group, but largely just Israeli spyware. This is written by Zero Edge back in 2017. meet the Israeli cyber weapons dealer paid millions by governments to hack our phones. Just to show you how this goes well before 2017, by the way. The NSO group owned by U.S.-based Francisco Partners. That's what was being reported, of course, by Zero Edge. Back at a time when this was something, you know, I was posting this before, this was just before we started doing mostly our original content.

Starting point is 01:35:20 And so what's funny to me is back then, it was, we got them. So it's a, it's a U.S. bank company. No, it's not. I mean, this is Israeli spyware. This is the reality of it. It goes back to the same kind of point. But either way, the point is, the reality is we've always known what this was. We've always known that this is vicious.

Starting point is 01:35:37 It's weaponized. Now here is one for 2018 for Whitney Webb. Snowden is Israeli spyware used by governments to pursue journalists targeted for assassination. 2018. Same conversation. This is NSO group. Pegasus Software. And read through these.

Starting point is 01:36:01 My point today is not to go through each of these articles, but just simply to show you the 2018, the conversation of them. I mean, very, very publicly acknowledging what NSO group in particular represented. Criminals. Israeli government-connected criminals. They're spying and killing innocent journalists, activists. 2021, Robert In The Clash for Last American Vagabon. Israel is aiding Saudi Arabia and others to spy on human rights. rights activists,

Starting point is 01:36:30 NSAO group. This is all leading somewhere. 2025, as it shows you, Israeli spyware firm NSA group found libel for hacks. So they literally got found guilty, or at least liable for what they were doing through WhatsApp and plenty of other apps, guys, plenty of them. We also let's not forget.

Starting point is 01:36:49 Let's also not forget in 2025, Mike Walls, who is now an ambassador, still in the government, was caught using a telem, it's called telemine. message. It is an app that is used by Israeli intelligence to archive signal. He was literally using the Israeli intelligence app on his phone in the inner circle of the Trump White House. Of course, the media, because I'm telling you, there's more going on than just left, first right,

Starting point is 01:37:14 only called at a signal gate. They didn't talk about the most. Why would that be important? It's important because what was important was telemessage was an archive app used by Israeli intelligence, and this was clearly relaying information outside of the inner circle. And right after this, he got pushed to the side. It's called telemessage, is connected to the same conversation. It is in earlier, these are the same points. This is what you now have in your phone, in my opinion, some level of this invasive technology that's all interconnected.

Starting point is 01:37:43 Next, we have this one from 2025 December. This is a larger conversation about smartphones that were worldwide, silently infected with Israeli spyware. Intellexa. All of this is interconnected to the same elements, guys. Anyway, so the point. point in all of this is to show you that right up until the end of, you know, 2026, this is a conversation we've been covering for years that connects back to Israel and in regard to spyware, which they're

Starting point is 01:38:08 sort of a leader of, okay? So here's where this gets even more important. Derek, as I said, wrote this in 2024, already telling you about NSO, but a lot of them. Some you've heard, Sellbright, Clearview AI, saying, meet the tech spyware companies that are preparing to unleash in their, in Trump's second term, which that's not what anybody should want. that's because he opened this door. Okay. 2024, Biden, ICE signs $2 million contract with spyware maker Paragon Solutions. So that's the same overlapping point.

Starting point is 01:38:45 2024, October, end of October, ICE's $2 million contract with spyware vendor is under White House review. Now, I'm of the mind that I don't think this is really Biden concerned about this. They've been allowing this invasiveness for a long time. but I just think that the way that before the Trump time frame, these people at least tried to make it look like they weren't doing it. But I think they were just as much involved with this. But whatever you think about it, Biden publicly acted like he was going to pull this under review. Okay.

Starting point is 01:39:13 Then before we get to the point where Trump steps him, December 20th, 20204. So at this point, it's in limbo, right? Where Biden is essentially, you know, I'm going to review this because these spyware things are problematic. Israeli spyware maker bought in U.S. private equity in rare move, December 20th, 2024. The U.S. private equity firm, A.E. Industrial Partners, or just sometimes called A.E.I. Has acquired one of Israel's leading spyware companies in a move that's injected enthusiasm into the Middle Eastern country's scandal-plagued surveillance technology.

Starting point is 01:39:50 They're not a Middle Eastern country for crying out loud. Well, I mean, technically they are, but in the sense of what we're talking about in the world. But, I mean, what's funny is it's like one point when they want to, they want to claim they're part of Europe, right? And if they're not, they're technically very much part of the Middle East. My point is that what they are and what they demonstrate, it's, you know, the Palestinians were part of the Middle East. Anyway, the point is the U.S. private equity firm, A.E. industrial partners acquired Israeli spyware company. As it says, the scandal-plagued surveillance technology industry. scandal plagued by largely Israel, A.E. A.E. Industrial Partners plans to merge Paragon with red lattice.

Starting point is 01:40:36 A U.S. cybersecurity firm that it owns, said the person. But Paragon will continue to operate out of Israel. And as plans to expand its footprint, the person added, Paragon spyware is designed to hack into phones and convertly gather messages that are sent using encrypted messages. Oh, so basically to be able to see what you're sending on encrypted apps like Signal. Got it. And WhatsApp. Okay, so in case you missed the point. The Israeli spyware maker was bought by a U.S. private equity firm called AE industrial partners who

Starting point is 01:41:19 merged that is rarely spyware company with red lattice, which is a Virginia-based U.S. company. Okay. I'm sure you can see where this is going. So that went forward as a U.S.-based company, even though Israel operates, Paragon operates out of Israel. See how that works?

Starting point is 01:41:41 This shell game cover, in my opinion. Now, this is, you can argue it's still not connected to the White House app. Certainly. What I'm trying to show you is a deeper connection of Israeli spyware that is basically melded, mashed together with the U.S. industry here. Then in September of the next year, 2025, Trump gives green light for a $2 million ice deal with notorious Israeli spyware company. So now the one that Biden had on hold was now greenlit, right? but after they have basically made it look as if it's more of a U.S. leaning entity. Probably their only way to get beyond the, you know, framing of the legal situation.

Starting point is 01:42:33 The Times of Israel, Trump administration reinstates contract with Israeli founded spyware maker Paragon. Graphite, this is later in the month, the Israeli spyware acquired by ice. Right. So you can see how this keeps going, right? And so at this point, though, it's still really spyware, but they've blended with red lattice and are now a Virginia-based element, even though it still works out of Israel. Here, Gov tribe, red lattice incorporated. Now, just take a step back. Now that we just, I mean, made it clear that the Israeli spyware company blended with red lattice,

Starting point is 01:43:10 which is funny how you wouldn't then go, they both become Israeli companies, you still go, they both become U.S. companies, even though they work out of Israel. It seems like a choice. but in this case, let's look at what other things Red Ladis is tied to. So what I'm trying to highlight here is that Red Ladis, that is blended with Paragon, which is an invasively dangerous Israeli spyware company, also happens to have tons of overlap with the U.S. government. Red Ladis Incorporated.

Starting point is 01:43:36 Doing business as Red Latus, Inc. is a leading provider of advanced cyber capabilities for government and Fortune 500 markets. Worldwide, by the way, but U.S. predominantly. The company specializes in cybersecurity service. services and solutions for complex operational challenges, offering expertise in vulnerability assessment, fantastic, malware analysis, reverse engineering, software development, and operating system security. As a federal contractor, Red Ladis provides a range of information technology and cybersecurity

Starting point is 01:44:04 products and services to U.S. government agencies, particularly the Department of Air Force and Air Education and Training Command. The company's offerings are designed to address evolving cyber defense needs across the federal government. Interesting. The company's subcontracting work includes providing qualified personnel for cyber mission force capability development, as well as supplying various cyber-related products and software solutions, including the Vail infrastructure. Well, to be clear, that sentence ended for the podcast and software solutions period, new paragraph halfway down, including the Vail infrastructure platform, Tahoe Testing Framework, Vulnerability Assessments,

Starting point is 01:44:47 via phantom and engineering services for securing IT systems. My concern, there's no little like this, one of these is a $92 million project. There's a bunch of different contracts. We're talking about a massive company that is embedded with tons of different cyber and military elements. And in case you missed the point, that is Israeli spyware. That is literally Paragon Solutions. I don't know why that shouldn't matter to people.

Starting point is 01:45:11 So back to the point, if what we're talking about is, the White House app that is built by our government, or at least with, you know, coordinated through the White House, and we can quite literally see that a few years ago, whatever, what was the, in 2024, a couple of years, two years ago, three years ago, blended with the U.S. company, and that company is now involved with tons of government stuff.

Starting point is 01:45:36 You can easily argue that a lot of these things are interconnected as well. I'm even trying to make that case. You can, you know, decide, I'm not trying to be subjective and just say, that makes everything is really connected. I'm not. but it's undeniable that that's the reality and that these companies are embedded, immersed with U.S. government infrastructure, military, everything,

Starting point is 01:45:56 and that they're rolling out an app now that is shamelessly spyware, I'm sure you can consider the overlapping concerns. And we'll continue with this. Oh, I'm glad I remembered that, by the way. Also, on this, back to this article about the Red Lattice Incorporated government interconnectivity, take a look at when it all started. And I'm sure you'll be able to find the year correlation, right? So the explosion of this pretty much started once they started to work their way in.

Starting point is 01:46:25 This, to me, you've seen both. I just shared it again just to put it in one place. But as always, listen to these in light of what we just talked about. And this is about not just technology, this is about companies. It's about invasive action. as Israel has proudly bragged about doing this. And here they are. In fact, let me do this.

Starting point is 01:46:53 I have them both upload, but I cut together one just to do it as one clip. Who did they buy it from? Or I think they were buying it from. We have an incredible array of possibilities of creating foreign companies that have no way being traced back to Israel, shell companies over shell companies who affect the supply chain. to our favor. We create a pretend world. We are a global production company. We write the screenplay. We're the directors. We're the producers. We're the main actors. The world is our stage. Did you see any surprises in Gaza? Surprises? Yeah. Like the intelligence surprises. Pages,

Starting point is 01:47:31 walkie-talkies. Do you know how many equipment, I mean treated equipment do we have in these countries? You can't, you're not? I do. You mean, you mean booby-trapped equipment? not only will be trapped and spying. Manipulated equipment. In which countries you're talking about? All the countries that you can imagine. You know, amazing what people can choose to ignore. It's right there in front of you.

Starting point is 01:47:56 It's right there. And you can argue it's all lies, but we just went through provable information that shows you an undeniable connection and overlap a merging of these two things. I just really hope people can put this together and see the reality of where we actually. actually are. Now, here's a couple of other points that add to that invasiveness that I just came

Starting point is 01:48:18 across that I think are alarming. This is from S2 Underground. It says this is also, we'll start with this one actually. Start from SOAR Atlas. It says many people have asked why satellite imagery showing damage in Israel. This is becoming kind of a big talking point for people, and I'm glad it is, asking why damage in Israel isn't available on our platform. This is like a GPS sort of satellite imagery. And it says this is primarily due to limitations in the available satellite data, along with current restrictions in place during this conflict. So two different things. The current restrictions is the important part. The restrictions placed on during this conflict is the same problem, but more specifically pointed, targeted. I'll make that clear in a second. Large scale

Starting point is 01:49:02 damage in Iran is often visible in freely available satellite imagery due to its scale, for example, impacts on air bases, industrial facilities, extensive smoke plumes. In contrast, impacts in Israel have been reported to be typically smaller and more localized, often affecting individual buildings and streets, which usually fall below the resolution of free satellites. That's the excuse really, but as you see, I'm not, I shouldn't even say that. They're just kind of saying that's possible, which is true. But it says, open source satellites imagery collected by the likes of the European Space Agency and NASA have a course of resolution compared to them. This means the damage can be difficult to detect unless it occurs large scale. Now it says in saying this, that's this is the point.

Starting point is 01:49:41 We highly encourage anyone to explore and investigate areas of interest using the free tools available on SOAR Atlas. We're also always open to communicate community suggestions. Oh, wait, hold on. Yeah, it says this means that damage can be difficult to detect. Detecting this level requires high resolution imagery. Oh, no, I'm sorry. So I'm just mixing them together. So he adds the law that explains why this is happening.

Starting point is 01:50:09 So just sorry to the bottom line, go back to this, is what they're saying here is simply that, you know, there's issues with this and there's certain locations where this is hard to see. And it's saying this, we hardly encourage anyone to explore the investigate this. We don't have to take sides. And so what this person is pointing out, it's also pertinent to remind people of basically why this is happening, that in some locations is blurred out, which people are starting to see and some not. Remind that the United States has a special law that only applies to it. Israel, which restricts the resolution of imagery that can be offered by American companies.

Starting point is 01:50:45 The Kyle Bingman Amendment in 1997 NDAA, which is always slipped in, prohibits high-resolution imagery, specifically of Israel. This law stipulates that American companies have to reduce their resolution to deliberately censor their imagery to be in line with the lowest common denominator resolution scale. Of note, this restriction does not apply to the Homeland United States. States. Companies like Max on our planet and Ventor can offer extremely high-resolution satellite imagery. Israel is the only place on Earth that is censored by law by the U.S. government. You can look at you. You can look all over the United States, but this America

Starting point is 01:51:27 First administration, well, it's not just them, but the government here are blocking viewing of Israel. The only reason we have any imagery of Israel at all is due to European companies and so on. Okay, so you get the point, guys. So for anyone who's curious as to why it's always a challenge to find out what locations have been struck in Israel, this is a contributing factor. They're censoring your view of that. Now, somebody even asked Grock down here, Grock, please explain asymmetric accommodation. And it says asymmetric accommodation describes the United States unique one-way policy favoring Israel. And it points out the amendment where it shows basically licensed firms from stop firms from selling imagery of Israel,

Starting point is 01:52:07 sharper than non-U.S. commercial sources. Applied? Nowhere else. I mean, how do you miss that? How would that? Why wouldn't you wouldn't do for the UK? Right? Only Israel. I just don't know how you miss that. Now, if you want to just suddenly make it only about one religion, that's you doing that. Nobody else is doing this. This is about Israel and what and the reality of what our government allows for their government actions, for their ongoing genocide, for their set, for what they do to Jewish people in Israel, by the way. The Orthodox Jews, they get beat up by IDF, every single day in that country because they speak out against Zionism. The point is very clear.

Starting point is 01:52:41 We just have to start being honest about it, guys. Now, in regard to the larger picture, this guy came out and pointed this out. I think the map is, I mean, I think there are different versions of it, but it's the same general point. He says, Turkish journalist came out and made this point, and he said, this is Israel's

Starting point is 01:52:57 alleged game plan, prolong the war so that all countries in the region become exhausted, drag Gulf countries into the conflict and fuel sectarian tensions between Sunnis and Shias, yep, long term, turn a Saudi Iran war into a wider conflict by involving Pakistan and stirring unrest among Shias and Pakistan, push Kurds into Iran and provide conflict between Iranian Turks and Kurds, yep, in Iraq, which we keep telling you, pit Kurdish groups

Starting point is 01:53:24 against the popular mobilization forces, exactly like we talked about, to ignite Arab Kurd tensions, draw Syria into conflict with Shia groups in Iraq, same point, occupy half-Webeneas parts of Syria, all of the West Bank, half of Lebanon, parts of Syria, West Bank, annexed Gaza, displaced Palestinians, weaken Turkey through waves of migration, drive entire region into chaos, ultimately established greater Israel. Now, there's floated points about Turkey,

Starting point is 01:53:49 now maybe joining Iran's side. I'm a little bit skeptical of all of that, but I believe that is floating around right now. But as I said, long have many of us warned this was driving U.S. foreign policy, right? Hard to deny that now, if you're not being completely blind. But some are sure trying.

Starting point is 01:54:08 But think about this. And this is the one that's at least, like this is almost identical to the patch they use. This is the one that I think is the most accurate to what they're really doing. But look, my opinion is they would take as much as they could. That's who these people are. But I'll play this clip too.

Starting point is 01:54:22 So that's important to hear that plan and where that leads. And I think what, you know, the important part here is just this is always guided the policy of the U.S. government, whether they even know it or not. This has been the planet. This starts, and it's really fascinating to go back. It starts in 1996 with Netanyahu,

Starting point is 01:54:42 who wrote a book called Fighting Terrorism. And the thesis of the book is quite straightforward and very dangerous. He says, you know, there's Hamas, there's Hezbollah, they oppose Israel. It's not good for us to fight them directly. That won't work. What we need to do is topple the governments that back them. So what we need is regime change throughout the Middle East. And he actually gave a long list of seven countries that included Syria, Libya, Iraq, Iran, Somalia, Sudan, and Lebanon.

Starting point is 01:55:26 And systematically, the United States has done Netanyahu's bidding. for almost 30 years now going to war with every one of them, except for the big one that Netanyahu so much longs for, which is the war directly between the United States and Iran. And now it's happening, right? Like legitimately happening. Not just the kind of back and forth, which is always leading there. And that statement was made or many I've made in the past, hadn't happened yet. And here we are. It's kind of hard to ignore, right? I mean, It's just like, it's just like clockwork, guys. And here is Netanyahu, for whatever reason, because this is a new clip telling you the point.

Starting point is 01:56:11 Netanyahu goes, as they write, fully psychotic and tells the world that he will single-handedly change the entire face of the Middle East. Yep. And that Israel will attack any country at any time. Exactly. He says, we will surprise them instead of them surprising us. We are the attacking side. We are the initiating side. We take the initiative.

Starting point is 01:56:27 Yeah. Kind of view, Netanyahu, to make that very clear. We always knew that if we weren't blindly partisan. you guys started this. We know that. This is just them telling you where this really goes. I almost think it's because he needs to gain support with his people to say, look, I've been promising you. I told you I could get them to do this. Here we are.

Starting point is 01:56:45 Now we're in charge. Just, you know, back me. And I think he's gaining support because of it. And what is he doing? He's letting Trump take the ball. And it seems like that's okay for him. I don't understand that. Now, I'm actually going to pretty much wrap right there, but I'm going to quickly go over the things I want to show you.

Starting point is 01:57:00 Just keep it in your mind. We'll talk about more of this next show. Joe, but on top of that, in the same conversation, Mohammed Safa from the UN has resigned in protest. And he says, after much reflection and after it became clear to me that some UN seniors are serving a powerful lobby, I'm sure you know what he's talking about and not the UN. I have decided to suspend all my duties as the PVA main representative at the UN and form

Starting point is 01:57:24 all UN committees and from all UN committees groups of which I am a member. I cannot in good conscience be part of or witness to what is. happening at the time when the UN is preparing for possible nuclear weapon use. That's something that they're not, that's he's saying. So consider he's not, you know, consider he's wrong, consider he's lying. But he has been consistently calling this out from the beginning to his, to his detriment, about Gaza. And the point is, he's telling you the UN is considering possible nuclear weapon use in the

Starting point is 01:57:54 sense that they, planning for it being done in the world. What do you think that's coming from? It's very obvious, especially since the U.N. has many times made clear that they don't believe UN has a nuclear weapon. So pretty clear we all know what Israel might do. And even U.S. and even Rubio made that statement. And so it's been an honor cooperating with the U.N. for nearly 12 years under different secretary generals, human rights council presidents.

Starting point is 01:58:18 May God bless this world. He also adds, punishing me by closing my wife's bank account. So can you just, you feel the familiar tactics, guys? What does she have to do with all this? She's an EU ordinary citizen. but they closed her bank account because he quit the UN. I'm sure you know where this is coming from. I'm not even making it one group.

Starting point is 01:58:39 This is what we deal with. Convo 19, trucker convoy. You do the wrong thing. The power structure step on your neck. And this is, what is he doing? He quit. It's because he's making it his life's mission to call all this out. It's what it is.

Starting point is 01:58:55 And he says, as far as I know, people are betting on my head on Twitter right now in the other platforms. He says, I'm making it publicly known. I'm not suicidal. But he points out all these different threats he's getting from, you know, random accounts that are saying your time will come soon. He's just saying, look, they're threatening me. And he quit. And they're still doing it.

Starting point is 01:59:13 Here, on top of that, Saeed Mohamed Marendi, you might have seen this. For over four days, he posted this back on 24th. Twitter and Elon Musk have allowed a Zionist Ukrainian group to use Twitter to literally raise millions of dollars to try to kidnap him. And I'm not saying joking. They're literally crowdfunding to find him. and keep him alive.

Starting point is 01:59:32 That's what they're, and this is not a joke, by the way. Crowdfunding this. And not only that, it's allowed to be paid partnership on Twitter. Oh, but don't worry. They added some context. I mean,

Starting point is 01:59:45 and he's been screaming about this. And he goes, it, of course, clearly implies torture and murder. Yet not a single Western official journalist or media level condemn it, let alone investigate.

Starting point is 01:59:54 Can you wonder why? Can you factor that in? Of course, Patrick Hannan said a great interview with him. You can watch it talking about this. One million dollar bounty. The day, it's just, it's beyond pale, guys. Lastly, we just briefly quit, you know, to wrap up, we talked about the lies of his, of Trump negotiation with Iran.

Starting point is 02:00:12 I'm pretty sure we can all just establish that that was a big lie since we're here and Iran's turned down his point plan and maybe something changes in a couple days by the sixth, I doubt it. But that's the reality. He pretended to have some defector he was talking with. That didn't happen. He put forward a 15 point plan to Iran's leadership that moments ago, he says were irrelevant and probably hiding in caves.

Starting point is 02:00:31 And then they turned it down. and it just absurd where we are. So as of right now, they turned down his offer ceasefire for the second time. As Israel continued to bomb, which is the point. So not only get Israel bomb, the U.S. alongside them in cases did, and they literally bombed a nuclear power plant, which, by the way, explicitly was included with Trump's idea of infrastructure. So Trump puts on a pause for 10 days and says,

Starting point is 02:00:54 we won't bomb, and then they bomb anyway. And not only do they bomb, they bomb the very infrastructure that he claimed they wouldn't target. We'll go over this tomorrow. Iran says Israeli strikes violated Trump's deadline. Of course they did. But also because you can show that Israel is coordinating in some cases with U.S. elements, which shows you there either way, though.

Starting point is 02:01:13 They told us this was a joint war. They're both claiming they're fighting Iran. But yes, somehow Trump can make a thing and Israel can just keep going and no one calls that out. How does nobody see how clear that is? Not even the corporate media in many cases outside of things like this where Iran says the thing. Oh, you mean aside from us having eyes the hill? Can you not acknowledge that happen? Of course it did. Israel told you they've publicly claimed that they bombed that nuclear facility.

Starting point is 02:01:38 It's a civilian nuclear power plants, what it is. And even if it's not, it doesn't not, then suddenly doesn't become, he said he would not not bomb anything in that area. That's what he said. So whether or not you think it's weapons, despite all the evidence showing you it's not, still counts. My point is they just do it anyway. Yemen is now saying they're going to join the war.

Starting point is 02:02:01 And what they said is interesting, saying they're still adhering to a ceasefire they did with the U.S. government from 2025 because they seemingly have principles and honor. And the point is they said, we're going to go at this in Israel. But if you bomb us, Trump, you're now, you violate ceasefire. How much you want to bet he does anyway. We have Russia having drone strikes second largest refineries. Who's to say, if it's Ukraine or Israel or that you could realize both of the same thing at this point, the point to me, or maybe Russia did it to himself.

Starting point is 02:02:31 that's possible. The reality is it is increasing the dramatic problem with the oil infrastructure, which you can see that from a global coordinated manipulation if you want, or you can recognize Israel's trying to do it to put people in certain positions or think about the different possibilities. Either way, it is continuing. And someone's pulling on these strings, guys. And reality of what they've been doing in Iran in case you haven't paying attention is disgusting. As the foreign minister reports, take up the gram of salt, but you can easily verify most of these things, demolish 22 schools a day. 40 kids per day in Iran. Here's even the BBC.

Starting point is 02:03:04 Iranian schools, hospitals, landmarks among civilian sites hit. They can't hide from this, guys. It's being very well documented, regardless of what they say. Here is, like just as in Gaza, Trita points out, the U.S. is lifting the constraints on how Israel can use American bombs. 2,000 pound bombs in the core of Tehran. And by the way, you know when you start a Twitter post, you refresh it and the video starts playing? Guess what? not when it's this guy of content.

Starting point is 02:03:31 Mark, check for yourself. I did this with every other post I've had. Every other one starts playing, but not this one. Gee, I wonder why. Well, because it's showing you Iranian children suffering, because they're bombing into Iran. That's why. That's my opinion.

Starting point is 02:03:45 I guess it's just a glitch, you know. It's funny how that works on this Elon broken platform. Well, Patrick Henderson points out is this is Iran, at an Iran University that they're bombing. And Patrick says this is what they do. Israel and the U.S. now targeting their universities. It's really what they do every single time. The Iranian government says more than 93,233 civilians have civilian facilities and 600 schools have been damaged since the start of the war.

Starting point is 02:04:11 That's what they were giving those numbers for. Channel 12, of course, says that in case of a U.S. ground invasion in Iran, I hope you're listening, America first, MAGA people, Israeli soldiers will not participate on the ground. Gee, it's almost like we literally called that. I'm sure the people did too, but I mean, explicitly made this case. They will not be on the ground. Now, that's Channel 12. Channel 12 could be wrong.

Starting point is 02:04:37 Channel 12 could just be saying what they think. I believe this is what will happen. God forbid this ridiculous government drives Americans into this country for no justifiable reason and commits another war crime. Israel will stand by and let it happen. And maybe, maybe that'll reach a few more people to recognize what's really going on. God forbid that has to happen to get it there. Let's hope we can stop it.

Starting point is 02:05:00 I'll end today with the great Kerry Wedler. Leave it there for the day. We'll see you tomorrow. Thank you for tuning in. I love you all. As always, question everything. Come to your own conclusions. Stay vigilant.

Starting point is 02:05:15 There are a lot of huge lies about the war in Iran. That the Iranian government post an imminent threat to the United States. The chronic omission of the fact that the CIA played a direct role in the rise of the Iranian regime. that Trump isn't Israel's bitch, or that the U.S. ruling establishment cares at all about innocent Iranians. But the biggest lie of all is that we are at war with Iran. We, is in hundreds of millions of American people, are not attacking Iran. We are not bombing Iran, killing civilians, or doing Israel's bidding. The soldiers in the U.S. military and the ruling class masters barking commands at them are.

Starting point is 02:05:44 You are quite literally not the military, and you are not the authoritarians who hallucinate that they have a right to commit violence in your name. You've simply been indoctrinated to believe that... We, the people, are the government. government. We are the government. We are the government. We are the government. According to this delusional logic, we have lied repeatedly to justify wars.

Starting point is 02:06:03 We slaughtered children during the occupation of the Philippines. We poisoned Vietnamese people with chemical weapons. We bombed civilians in World War II. We imported Nazi scientists to work for the U.S. government. We experimented with mind control. We infiltrated the media with propaganda, and we probably still do those things. And today, apparently, we have racked up $38 trillion of debt with reckless spending on war and big government. We spy on ourselves.

Starting point is 02:06:25 We cook up terraplots to boil, we promote and defend the use of toxic pesticides, we protect predators, and we prop up human rights abusing regimes. Except we didn't and don't do any of those things. People claiming to possess the right to wield violent authority didn't do. Believing otherwise is conditioned collective as fiction. In reality, there are people in positions of power who claim extra special rights to compel their order followers, many of whom have good intentions but are also indoctrinated to commit acts of violence on one hand. And on the other hand, there are the rest of us, most of whom would never assert that we as individuals have such a right.

Starting point is 02:06:54 And yet through special rituals, incantations, uniform, sacred scrolls, and a barrage of propaganda from our youngest years, we outsource our identity and agency to these people, believing their extensions of ourselves who represent, serve, and protect us. Even though we don't have a right to commit violence, government agents who allegedly derive their authority and right to rule from we the people somehow do. In addition to the conflation of people with the governments that rule over them, nations are often conflated with governments. America did this. Iran did that. Israel did other things. False. Ruling authoritarian exploiting national identities and soldiers do. If you ever want to see solutions to the many problems governments create, a necessary start is to stop believing we are the government. Disabusing yourself from the

Starting point is 02:07:33 belief that these sociopaths have any legitimate right to rule over you, let alone argue. This delusion enables all the other lies they tell and atrocities they commit. But if you still believe you are the government, why don't you go fight?

The Last American Vagabond - TDWU - 3/29/26: Trump Releases White House App With Dangerous Spyware & Israeli Spyware's Quiet Comeback Under Trump

There aren't comments yet for this episode. Click on any sentence in the transcript to leave a comment.