The Last American Vagabond - The Anarchism Solution, Trump's Gavi Lie, FBI Manufactures Another Plot & US Military Censorship

Starting point is 00:00:01 It starts with a simple question and ends an objective reality. Through our journey from there to here, we find one another and ourselves. And as the next 24 hours breaks free from our last, we gaze onward in reflection of the day. Tell me your own conclusions. Welcome to the Daily Wrapup. Friday, August 21st, 2026. Thank you for joining me today. One thing I have to remember because I'm trying to remember to do that in the beginning of the shows.

Starting point is 00:00:49 Usually because there is a little bit of a gap that I end up, you know, getting things going around. You know, for those that don't know, we stream to just about everything you could possibly imagine, including the ones that we were censored from using pirate channels. Sad that never really got traction because that would have been pretty cool. But we still do. The point is as I start the show, I have to sort of. organize and set up, not organized, but just get going all the other streams or all the different platforms. And since there's usually a little gap, I figured, you know, we can put that up and play a little

Starting point is 00:01:17 bit. And then I'd let it go a little longer so you can hear the song. So hopefully that's not irritating for you. I think you guys would enjoy that. But getting started today, a lot to talk about, obviously. There's a lot to kind of pack into this. I wanted to start with something a little bit different today. And, you know, it's about ideology and like anarchism and the conversation of not necessarily like what, you know, you know my opinions about, you know, I guess anarchism, libertarianism, just voluntary, you know, voluntarism or however the different variations how people pronounce it, but the point being, you know, our choice. And I don't like to put labels on it because of a thousand reasons where these things tend to kind of couch people in the way they think

Starting point is 00:01:56 they're supposed to act. But really just coming down to the idea that we have a right to choose our own path. Like it's, you know, wild, right? And that we don't have some kind of overarching power structure of any kind dictating how you can live that life. And this is not about no rulers. Or, you know, it's not about no rules. It's about no rulers. And that's the important part I'm going to make about in the start today. And the reason I'm saying all this is a video that I thought was interesting was going around.

Starting point is 00:02:19 And I kind of set it aside to make a point about. And it's not about trying to say this is what you should believe. It's about trying to understand that the idea of coming from the perspective that we should be deciding for ourselves, how we live our lives. Even if that choice offends somebody else, that goes to both sides of the paradigm. that that should be what we agree on, that that would be something that we collectively try to at least seek together. And I'm going to get into it now. I wanted to get to lay out the show today,

Starting point is 00:02:46 but it's such an important topic. And I've talked about this so many times in the past about this idea that it's, you know, I mean, look, there are people today that yell that they, you know, we're doing this for democracy and they're not even doing those things for democracy or even in a democracy. But they sure is how yell it. And so does that then mean that that represents anybody who is, a democracy? No, especially since those aren't even though the point would be that anybody can say

Starting point is 00:03:11 they're doing something under the guise of something else or under the banner of something. Doesn't mean that it represents that thing or it even is that thing. But let's just even say you have a diehard anarchist, you act in exactly the way that I think, you know, what would represent that. They could still take action that they believe in. It doesn't represent everybody who believes a certain thing. And this should go to any ideology. Just because a socialist does one thing, doesn't mean every socials thinks that or any number of things, you know, status. They're all in that category for people that understand what the government is. But it's interesting to think about that we're in this time where right now I think people

Starting point is 00:03:43 are kind of open to some of these ideas. Difference of thought, you know, different ways to look at the world. It's not just left and right and vote in four years. It's, you know, maybe we should think about a different path. And a lot of them end up kind of cycling through the usual, you know, third party, you know, and maybe that is the path. You know, maybe I jumped away from those things too quickly. The point is I think a lot of us have worked over this path a long time, and I'm somewhat new

Starting point is 00:04:05 to this side of it. And I think it's important to kind of go after this again for people to think about the other possibilities out there. As I always point out, you know, anarchism, whether you think this is, you know, which doesn't just mean chaos. I'll go through it today. It's the only ideology out there, self-governance, which is not government, but it is governance that exists without a place for leaders or for government, rather, you know, that it's

Starting point is 00:04:29 not rulers. You know, this idea is so interesting that why would people and power structures who want to control your lives so desperately try to stop a thing? that doesn't have a place for them to exist. Baffles the mind, doesn't it? But yeah, I think it's an important thing to think about whether it's that direction or others just to see that I feel like we're trapped in this basic kind of idea. You know, like if you look at the left and right paradigm, you know,

Starting point is 00:04:51 you can look at it the same way of like socialism, fascism and like the same kind of arcing dynamic. And there's different variations, but almost history has seemed to kind of react that way. And again, it's overly simplified, clearly. But I think we need to start thinking away from that. What is the common thread on all of these problems? Government. And again, it may be hard for people to think about what a world would look like

Starting point is 00:05:14 without some kind of overarching structure. But this is why I think it's worth considering. Not that I'm going to sell you on it today. I'm only going to talk about this to start and this video that I think is relevant to kind of spark the conversation because it's just so much of a thing out there. I've done deep talks and studies on over the last decade. But I'm hoping people today will take the time to look into these alternative ideas and realize that, you know,

Starting point is 00:05:35 we all exist in a world that is the way it is, whether or not government exists. It is simply a structure that's placed over the top of it that basically claims the right of authority over all that we're doing. Without the idea of government, we all still exist. The people that build the roads, the people that want to run, you know, any number of things you could think of outside of being a government representative are all still there. All these specialties, all the expertise. And this is why it's important to think about how all of those people.

Starting point is 00:06:04 and that maybe just simplify it to a smaller location, this county, this town, whatever, could get together and say, can't we do this without this thing? Maybe not. Maybe not. I think so. And I think a lot of intelligent, educated, you know, very politically invested people in my entire life have laid that out so clearly, myself included. I digress.

Starting point is 00:06:24 Obviously, you can tell that I think this is an important topic and something that I'm passionate about. But other things we're going to talk about today, I jokingly said when I started, I got right into it. there's plenty of things, but ultimately the quick breakdown. I'm going to start with that point today that I do think is very relevant for a lot of reason. We're going to talk about some different points around, I guess, tariffs and the meat conversation

Starting point is 00:06:45 that really kind of a springboard for larger points, but it's something going around that's worth pointing to. And the two-party illusion stuff from that and the idea, again, kind of back, dovetailing back into the point I'm going to start with about the new political movements and how I don't see this being any different, even with good intentions, if it's still pushed into the same system. And I'll actually start with a great interview ahead with Sam and make some points from that. But I also want to talk about some points about Gabby, which is not even new. I'm actually completely surprised that I didn't see this happen at the end of July. And I think it's because

Starting point is 00:07:13 there's so much going on and we're so, you know, just that ultimately Donald Trump double crossing everybody to deep to fund again Gabby just like the last time. In fact, it's a little different. We'll go over it. It's happening again. I mean, it's not like it should be surprising, but or other examples of MRNA connections, points about what Elon Musk just put out. I want to reiterate something about masks, since I do see that conversation bubbling back up. And clearly that was a hill that we died on. I shouldn't say died on, but we're willing to die on. And we're right about it.

Starting point is 00:07:45 And we're still, you know, it's important to think about how clear that was all the way back then. David Maren's connection to the COVID-19 conversation, which I think is another headvake, guys. It's a potent conversation. I mean, I hope he still gets held accountable, but it's going to be a slap on the wrist, as we're already seeing come forward. And these people should be in prison for the rest of their lives, guys. And so documentation, slap on the wrist is not what anybody should be fighting for.

Starting point is 00:08:07 We'll talk about the FBI, false flag, manufactured plot, you know, old school news for this platform. How many times we've talked about this. I'm just laughing about how dumb this is today. With the image you can see on the main image for today, I mean, it's not a joke. This lady literally went into a Home Depot in a burqa after pledging to ISIS. and then, you know, and the FBI gave her the thing she needed the money to buy it, the car to go to the store. I mean, it's just about, it's insane.

Starting point is 00:08:35 And we'll get into how they exploit people with low intelligence and exploit people who are mentally handicapped. And that's not to say that's who this person is. But that's what they aim for is people who are emotionally manipulatable, people that they can coerce and then go, well, they wouldn't have done it if we didn't give them the material, the money, the drive, you know, we'll go into it. And it's just incredible. And that's not to say that this person might not have.

Starting point is 00:08:57 been willing to do something like this. That's a separate conversation. This is where you get into the idea of pre-crime, and it matters, guys. We'll talk about, of course, the idea of, as in the title, pointed out, the censorship in the military, which is not new, but it's coming up in the context of stars and stripes and some conversations after that that'll hold off in case time is an issue today. But I do want to either today or tomorrow get into Derek's amazing article about Anderil, which is not new to those that watch this platform or any of us.

Starting point is 00:09:24 It's just important to see where it is going and how they've now. tripled the amount that they're going to be working with and some updates on Iran. Unfortunately, guys, right when I was getting ready to get started, I found out my father went back to the ER. Now, again, personal note, for those of you've been following along, I'm not going to get into it all again today, but the sad reality is that it doesn't appear to be getting better. And we've luckily found somebody who, in the mainstream side of it, who does seem, you know, at least able to acknowledge that it seems pretty clearly to be an autoimmune issue, that

Starting point is 00:09:54 they're now beginning to actually identify, even though they're pushing for more surgery and we've already had surgeries and all it really ultimately would have taken. If this pans out to be what we think it is, that's what it's pointing at, is steroids. You know, it's just, it's incredible, the system that we're in and how people, even with good intentions are forcing people in pathways that are killing them. I mean, I can't imagine what would have happened during COVID. Now, again, I'm not even saying I know for a fact. That's what my father's situation is. It's what I believe is. You're going to No, first, the moment, we find something out more definitive. But sadly enough, he's now dealing with the problem coming back up again and had to go in today because he's worried something is getting worse.

Starting point is 00:10:34 And so ultimately now, our aggressive focal point is to try to find a specialist, somebody local, if you know anybody, reach out. You know, I mean, don't expect me to respond, getting a lot of reach out, but about somebody in California, which is where he is and somebody who is, you know, sort of a GI immune vaccine injury specialist. You know, somebody who's aware of the mainstream practices and open-minded enough to consider the alternative, you know, a smart person and let them consider what this information looks like. My brother, of course, is putting this through AI and all kinds of different things. And the information is just like unequivocally, like very clearly one of these different possibilities, none of which these people have even checked the boxes off the list. Anyway, I told you I wasn't going to get into today, but bear that in mind, just in general,

Starting point is 00:11:18 that, you know, time wise and so on. But let's get started today. I think an important thing to start with really had a fantastic conversation with Samusani, I believe this is the fourth time we've had him on the show. We talked about his vote-packed idea from before and the idea of sort of like using the third party on either side of it to sort of make an agreement that we're not going to vote for anybody in the left-right paradigm. We're going to only vote for a third party.

Starting point is 00:11:41 But if we both do it together, it kind of boxes out the idea of, oh, you're just taking a vote away from the main, you know, that whole argument. It's an interesting idea. Now, I want to preface, you already know, I just shouldn't need to reiterate my opinions because my principled stances on these things have been the same. I mean, save for some variations that have become more aware of things, the same for a decade, guys, longer than that. So what's interesting, I guess I'm only kind of saying is because certain people read the title

Starting point is 00:12:07 and we're like, Ryan, really? Now you're believing in the system. And it's like, you know, come on. The title does not, you know, a title, anyway, the whole show you should watch before you jump to conclusions about what my opinions might. have radically changed about. The point is, no, I do not think that's possible, which Sam knows. And I talked to him about this. That's just why I respect him so much. And we don't agree on everything. I just believe he's a good person. I believe he does things for the right reasons as I see it.

Starting point is 00:12:32 That doesn't mean that he might not take a wrong path or decide to double cross as all. I don't believe that, but we'll see. And I love how it ends too, because Sam literally says to me, hold me accountable. Because it's exactly what I expect from people who want to be held accountable, people who actually mean what they say. And I'm hoping that is what Massey and somebody like that turns out to be. I have doubts, obviously. But the point, as I've always said, is it somebody like a Massey or Sam? They mean what they say.

Starting point is 00:12:56 They would be demanding, like Sam does, that we hold his feet to the fire. Because he means what he says and he wants to do it. That would be the point if that's the case, like with the Massey. So we had this great conversation about a couple things. One was in case you hadn't seen it. In fact, let me grab it real quick, since we're briefly pointing to it. I believe I still have it pulled up where basically Sam, yeah, here it is right here. Oh, this is actually perfect.

Starting point is 00:13:22 I'll just play this. Oh, here's actually a longer one right here. I'll let's speak for itself. It's enjoyable to watch. Trump sold his false promise to the American people that he would drain the swamp. The presidency is supposed to be a public trust. Trump has turned it into the single most profitable. Senator, you talk about.

Starting point is 00:13:41 corruption when you talk about corruption when you back genocide what could be more corrupt than backing genocide this is part of the same con with you and trump playing off of each other oh he's worse oh he's worse you were put on notice in in in november of 2023 by the center for constitutional rights and other legal and human rights organization notice on potential legal liability for aiding abetting and citing or conspiring to commit genocide through congressional acts and demand. You are put on notice and you backed it and you backed a genocide to the hill for years on end. How dare you talk about corruption? How dare you talk about corruption? Thank you for your diatribe. Oh, you get to make a speech every day. You

Starting point is 00:14:32 get to make a hypocritical speech every day and God forbid you should be questioned about your diabolical record. It's amazing that you can show your genocidal facing public. Mr. Senator, Mr. Senator, shame on public citizens for not allowing questions to this genocidal maniac.

Starting point is 00:14:55 Shame, yeah, corruption. What could be more corrupt than not allowing questions? Right. The whole point in when he got there, he found out he weren't allowed to ask questions. Great, great event for journalists to show up. The point is they invited a journalist and then said, you can't ask questions.

Starting point is 00:15:10 Just be here to basically, regurgitate what I say about how bad Trump is, combating corruption. How insulting, you know, and this is exactly why he got upset. He's passionate. He believes in this, you know, and it's just so it's incredible, at least as I understand, you know, again, I'm not going to tell you to believe what I think about anybody's opinions, but that's what my impression is of what he believes. And so the point is that he did this. And I was like, that's nice to see somebody getting called their face and that he says it about both sides. That's refreshing. So I invited him on to talk about it. And ultimately, in the process of that setting that up, he announced that he was running for Congress

Starting point is 00:15:44 in Maryland. And so we touched on that as well. And so what's interesting is you know my opinions about this. And Sam does, as I said, and we talked about it. And I even told him, I said, you know, don't expect me to vote for anybody because I don't believe it's translated the outcome. But I still do believe two things, or many things, but in this context of one, if anybody, including somebody like you out there who believes you can make a difference doing what he's doing, then try. I would never, I would never, it's the same thing I think about voting. If you believe that it might make a difference, go for it. Just don't think that it's the only thing you should be doing.

Starting point is 00:16:14 And so we talk about it in that context as well as the fact that I believe that doing it from like Derek Burroughs running for mayor simply to be able to expose the corruption or if he happens to win to bring it all down or, uh, John McPhee, I interviewed him when he was running in, I think 2020 before he, you know, a while before he passed away or got killed or whatever happened ultimately. And, and he was doing the same thing. I'm only running to be able to bring the whole system down. Adam Kokesh.

Starting point is 00:16:38 Same thing when I interviewed him about that. He said he was running to be able to bring the system down. So the point is, is he's saying he's running to bring awareness to this from an activism perspective. And obviously if he wins, he and we talked about what he will try to do. And he talks about data centers and Israel influence. We talked about Section 219. You know, and it's exactly what I want to hear.

Starting point is 00:16:55 But that's why I will be more aggressively accountable for somebody like that because I'm hoping that they're actually mean what they say, you know? I mean, my gut opinion is that the system will never allow somebody like that. to be in position, but I'll support his run for it for sure. And like I said, I don't believe the system actually translate. So I'm not going to be doing that because I believe that is the illusion itself is thinking that you can go there and vote. But as I've always pointed out, if there is a place where that would be, it would be the more local you get. So you can take that into consideration. And I really want to stress that. I don't want to, you know, drive people to think they shouldn't

Starting point is 00:17:28 try that. If you still, if you disagree with me in the slightest, take that action. But as I was talking about somebody online. In my experience, the no voting crowd are some of the most politically active people that I've ever met in my life. Like Derek, people that are avidly like, vote James Corbett, vote no one, 20, since the long as I've been doing this.

Starting point is 00:17:46 And 2020, you know, 2012, the point is that these people are recognized that the voting process has been bastardized and in an actual statist representative society, if that's what you want, then voting would be paramount, but that it's been taken from us, been manipulated. And so if you want to do it,

Starting point is 00:18:02 But go for it. But the point is there are a million more politically active things you can do than checking that box every two to four years. Okay, that's important, I think. And this is why I segued this with the point of the anarchism conversation. But please check it out because I do think it's a great interview. We talk about a lot of different points, his opinions on Iran and a lot of different things. And so what I want to translate, right to transition this into is the conversation of the anarchism video that was going around. Now, this is what I first saw. Now, I want to point out, by the way. Okay. Come on. I'm hoping I'm having a problems here. Okay, give me a second. Guys, so it won't let me bring up the screen share all of a sudden. This is what I've been dealing

Starting point is 00:18:45 with, guys. It says before presenting a screen, remove other media from the screen. There's nothing up there. Just before I got started, I was doing the same thing and it wasn't letting me put a video up because it said that the video had been deleted. I have no idea what's going on, guys. So I don't know how to go this all of a sudden. So let me see if I can open another window like I was doing before that didn't have to do last time and see if I can bring up something else. Damn it, this might derail the entire show. I'm going to take a screenshot just so I can show you guys what it was saying. So the videos can come up.

Starting point is 00:19:22 Let me delete the screen. Let me remove the screen share. Do it again. I shouldn't have to watch. I should just be playing a video so you guys have to walk. But I want you to know what's happening. I don't want you to think that I'm just, that's part of what I work. about it's people that are new.

Starting point is 00:19:37 We're like, man, this guy's all over the place, even though I can't be anyway. Okay. Screen share. Okay. Let's try this and see if it works. Let's work. Come on. There we go.

Starting point is 00:19:52 Okay. Sorry about that, guys. Here, actually, I'll show you real quick, since we're not, I'm not necessarily, well, I mean, I might end up being in a rush, but let's just do this real quick so you can see this. And again, I'm never, like I say every time, guys, I don't know what this stuff is. For all, you know, this is just streaming or having problems. but it's weird how often this happens to us. And that's what I always want to point out to people

Starting point is 00:20:12 is that I'm not, you know, I don't know what's causing this, but it's just a weird concentration for our platform all the time. And again, it's like it could be any number of things, but it's just before presenting a screen, remove other media, and I'd had to delete the screen share to bring it back up. Probably just a glitch.

Starting point is 00:20:28 Who knows? Still find that strange happens to us all the time. Okay, continuing. So, now watch you won't come back up. Okay, here we go. So this is a video that I saw going, This is the post I saw. Now, long story short, this person blocked me because of what I said, and that wasn't why I brought

Starting point is 00:20:44 it up, but I'll include that because I just think it's perfectly sort of an end cap on this whole thing. And so I don't want to refresh this because I don't want to, well, I think I have it over here just in case. Yeah, here's the main one. So this is the post. Of course, her name is, she thinks freely. I'll let that carry over as you can laugh at that and we're done.

Starting point is 00:21:00 PSA to the Libertarians, anarchists, and all other, listen to this, anti-American subversives. guess, subversivis, or maybe that is how you pronounce that, right? It's subversive. That's not how you spell subversives, is it? Anyway, I don't care. Subversives was the point. So basically saying libertarians, which, by the way, the Trump administration, like aggressively tried to tap into. False, pretending to be with Massey and Ron Paul. But think about how insane it is. But just you don't, just, you know, for the podcast too. Her image is women for Trump. Die hard fake MAGA, which is what I would call it, not the ones that actually wanted what Trump. promise, but still pretend he gave them the things he never did. That's this person, as far as I could

Starting point is 00:21:42 tell from looking at their content. But that, you know, libertarians are anti-American. I mean, how do you even fact? How do you even make sense of that? And I want to be clear, this is not some weirdo one. This is not only to get a, you know, pretty good reach for the 11,000 followers, but this is a sentiment that I see throughout the fake MAGA, not the real ones who probably largely like the idea of libertarianism and, you know, voluntarism, because that's what they try. to emulate and now don't like Trump because they didn't get what they were promised, like a whatever you think of whether he is libertarian, like a Dave Smith type who wears that label and pointed out Trump was lying because he was. So continuing, by the way, in my mind,

Starting point is 00:22:23 so you know, and we'll get into it at the end of the segment here, is it anarchism, libertarianism are in the same category. Anarchism is not chaos. It does not mean you're just a maniac lighting things on fire. Guys, that is what the power. This is why I ultimately think we're getting content like this, that people like this from this, kind of fake political team sport magicide or team sport, you know, politics, is to conflate the idea of anything that gives you the idea of a freedom with less government with the idea of terrorism. This is not even new, but this is getting way more alarming today because of how much, I mean, look at what we've seen. Does anybody actually not notice the difference of what

Starting point is 00:22:57 we live through? Like, I don't want to compare by the Trump because people are so quick to see the partisan lens, but just go back to, you know, any administration. It's a, I mean, but it's true. over the last eight years, look at where we are compared to either one of those. Even Trump's last administration, it's absolutely insane where we are. So to think more freedom, less government, you're now an anti-American terrorist. And that happens. That's Trump's domestic terrorism post, executive order, just like Biden's. She says, we the people, of course, don't you love how they love to pretend to represent everybody

Starting point is 00:23:31 in this country, aka MAGA, which again is the, in her mind are the people that's still back Trump, no matter what he does wrong. We'll never unite with you, she screams. Okay, so I don't want to read that first part. We'll read through what she says next. Let's play this clip and you'll see what they're referencing. Oh, shoot. Oh, good, I still haven't.

Starting point is 00:23:50 Okay. Because she has me blocks. I don't want to lose the post somehow. I think she can see it right there. Okay, so here's the post. So what you're going to hear is, and again, I want to be clear, I'm not, it's not about the people necessarily,

Starting point is 00:24:05 you know, whether they really believe what they're saying, or they have ulterior motives, because I'm sure people do. But these are, these are, you know, Mises Institute, you know, as it says, Doug French, President Emeritus of the Mises Institute explicitly says, anarchy is the solution or anarchy is the point. So what she's trying to do is frame this as they want chaos. They're telling you they want to burn it all down. They want the country to collapse.

Starting point is 00:24:26 But anybody with a brain, or rather, I shouldn't say like that, because plenty of people don't know any better or misled, but people who care about the truth and have looked into it, understand that's not what anarchy means. So I think there's an entire point here of trying to sabotage what is a growing movement of some sort of non, like lesser government direction.

Starting point is 00:24:43 What we're always told we're supposed to be doing in this country, especially for Republicans, but not the opposite of what's always happening. So let's watch the clip and you'll see what they mean. And what basically it comes down to is somebody in the chat in the conversation or in the crowd asking about why, you know, thinking anarchism is bad.

Starting point is 00:25:00 And they're going, that's the point, guys. We want, like, I'll let's speak for itself. And then we'll talk about it. said after the Roman Empire collapsed, that anarchy broke out. Isn't that what you said? Didn't that what we're after? Now, that first statement alone, I think, is important. And this is why I want to say, who knows what their real intentions are?

Starting point is 00:25:22 Maybe they really do pretend that it means chaos, and that's what they're driving. And if you make that connection to the post-war dynamic, what they're really talking about, I argue, is the fear-mongering, which is largely, if you look it up, sort of a classic, you know, one of the earlier examples of some sort of a coordinated conspiracy lie, really. They wanted the hype. It's sort of like the socialist scare thing today. Do they exist? Yes.

Starting point is 00:25:43 Even the ways they frame them? Yes. But is it this big scourge? It's like the red scare kind of a thing. It is manipulated. And back in what? Like many times start history. There's a famous time around 1890-ish where ultimately there was this big scaremongering push

Starting point is 00:25:57 about the like international anarchistic, you know, and what they were doing is making it about terrorism. People that were burning things down. Now, like I said earlier. Are there people that believe in, you know, that they're acting in the reality of anarchism and they want to go burn government buildings down and so on? Yes. You could even make a fair argument for why that would exist within that idea. The point nonetheless is it's not specific to everybody who believes those things. Somebody who believes in democracy, who starts some court,

Starting point is 00:26:24 like an actual democracy over here and somebody does one over there might do different things because it's how they see it. And the bottom line is what most people that I understand who are trying to fight for some kind of anarchistic change in the direction, at least, of that are fighting for not some chaotic society, but the exact opposite. Because we live in a chaotic society. We live in a broken, burning down, dumpster fire of a government-created broken society. What we want, at the very least, is to try give it a shot in the direction of something where we don't have the centralized, institutional, hierarchical government structures.

Starting point is 00:26:59 I think it's very possible, and I think we know it's possible, in fact, throughout history, but it's never been given a chance because of the very things. And that's one of the points that they point out. They say, well, see, there's never an example where it's ever succeeded. Well, there's also never an example where you don't see the power structures in existence, putting their thumb on it to try to stop it from being a threat. That's how this always works, in my opinion. For anarchy to break out.

Starting point is 00:27:23 Well, an anarchy might break out again, and that would be a bad thing. Okay. So you are on record as opposed to the rest of this crowd that anarchy breaking out would be a bad thing. That's right. No, as I said, as I said, look, you have to, you have to also see what the... Now, this guy's laughing, so it's kind of hard to hear him. I think he's got an accent too, but let's see another for the podcast. What the American Army looks like in the meantime. It's like the American army, they are, they let the Ukrainians do the fighting for a reason

Starting point is 00:28:04 because the American army is just a laughing stock. They are, they have. Stefan Kinsella has brought libertarianism ahead quite, quite a bit. If you read my preface to his big book, I hail him as being the most important legal theorist of his of his generation. Stefan, can you say something about this? I have thought about this before, about what fields need to be developed.

Starting point is 00:28:37 Most of the ones I have in mind are fairly esoteric. Although, that's why they cut it. That's also something that is, you know, bad. How dare we think esoteric? You know, at the end of the day, guys. And by the way, as somebody points in the chat, that apparently is how you spell subversives. It just looked odd to me for some reason.

Starting point is 00:28:53 But so it's an interesting thing here, right? First of all, what they're saying is, is that anarchy is not the, it's, you know, it's perceived as chaos and negative, but ultimately that the people that are looking for more of a less government libertarian anarchistic direction, that's not, that's not how it's seen by them. And ultimately, what we would drive toward would be less hierarchical structures and less top down government control, if government at all, which is how I would look at it. but it's an interesting thing for them to push back on, right?

Starting point is 00:29:25 And the idea that, and as he points out, like the military, you know, and this is be relevant to her comment. Are we not seeing the same things in the world? I mean, you point out, I mean, Venezuela is not a military victory. They succeeded in what they were trying to accomplish, but that was an intelligent success, right? I mean, at the end of the day, the act like that's a war one. It's just, it's kind of embarrassing.

Starting point is 00:29:45 If you look at the reality of everything else we've seen going back a very long time, when's the last time they had a real military service? success. I mean, even the ones they've occupied, can you call Iraq a success? Can you call, I mean, even Syria was ultimately now taken by Israel, essentially. Same thing's happening in Venezuela, by the way. But he's not wrong to point out with what's going on Iran, what the world can see, that there's a lot of hype going on. Americans are coming to, you know, kind of having a come to Jesus meeting about this and going like, well, I guess we aren't as powerful and almighty, even militarily, as we've been told. And I had this conversation a long time ago, for example,

Starting point is 00:30:19 about aircraft carriers. You want to understand how we have what? I mean, I haven't looked in a long time. Last I checked, it was like 13 compared to their four, like at the next closest country of like Russia or whatever. And again, that might have changed a lot in the last time I looked. The point was at the time, that's already a dot. We're going beyond that with drones and where this is going.

Starting point is 00:30:37 And they stated that at the time. But yet they kept dumping money into it. Why? Because we have this broken system where we live on the blood of other nations and the merchants of death and Raytheon and Lockheed Martin. They just had to keep the cycle going. Well, now that's a shift. to Palantir and Open AI and all the rest.

Starting point is 00:30:51 The point, though, was that it needed that even though we didn't. And instead of investing in what with the, now you have Rubio's, wringing his, you know, clutching his pearls and wringing his hands about, you know, drones in Iran, well, you know, you could have made that pivot a long time ago, but you guys were stuck in the same old cycle. But I digress. The point here is that, you know, the military is clearly either been driven into the ground for other reasons or is just not what we were told because we've been sold out

Starting point is 00:31:18 underneath us by the very people that were supposed to be supporting us. Same things happen. Look at Israel's military. It's the same conversation. It's all about hype. Now, what the post or the actual statement was from the first part, PSA to libertarians and anarchists all over the, you're anti-American subversives, MAGA will never unite with you except for the fact that I think the actual majority of conservatives that saw themselves as MAGA are very much on that side of the conversation right now. That's why I don't trust people like this and wonder where they're coming from. Because if you look at the, if you're in this community, you know this right now, guys. It's obvious. It was obvious to me in January going forward back when nobody was talking about it. And she says, what you're advocating

Starting point is 00:31:58 for is not limited government. In fact, it quite literally is. I don't know why, you know, they're just trying to make it different because they pretend they want limited government. So when they say that's not it, they're trying to different, you know, put space between them. But clearly, you can live in a libertarian society where there's limited government. Anarchism wouldn't have government as far as I would my my understanding of it. So it's a dumb thing to say. But she says Doug Fringe, President Emeritus of Mises Institute explicitly says anarchy is the point. Right.

Starting point is 00:32:27 No rulers. Not no rules. No rulers. Discussing the collapse of Rome and anarchy breaking out, Fringe says that's what we're after. In fact, here, let's just go real quickly to this. So this is even what just brave, just asking, you know, the search engine, what the, what they argue it is. Now, I found this actually quite revealing. In my experience, going back a lot, I mean, pretty much until now, you ask anything.

Starting point is 00:32:51 You don't get the real definition. You get chaos, even from these things, right? Unless you're going to like, you know, the dictionary, which would even secondarily, or maybe even first for the secondary, would have the actual definition. But this is what they gave me. Anarchy is not a form of governance in the traditional sense. Now, I disagree. I mean, governance is a different word than government because the whole point of anarchy is

Starting point is 00:33:10 it's self-governance. That's the whole thing, right? So it's important. It's just not government. in the traditional sense it says it is defined by the absence of central governing authority state rulers while it's often classified as political theory philosophy explicitly rejects hierarchical structures and coercive government institutions isn't that literally what everybody in this country is screaming about right now yeah maybe we should consider that this is something that's viable

Starting point is 00:33:34 instead of governing through a state anarchy advocates for self-governance and voluntary cooperation now that doesn't mean there's going to be somebody that will take advantage we're just like happens all over the place today. And in fact, the government does it too. So in this case, you would just kind of box out the idea that government takes advantage of its own power against you. You'll still have the dishonest people to try to steal. And again, I don't want to get pulled in

Starting point is 00:33:57 because I've had like hour-long conversations about outlining exactly how this would work. If you want to look into it, you should. The point is that there are very clear ways that this ultimately works out. But it also could fail, just like tons of other experiments in governance and society, like other failed democracies or whatever else. Again, it's weird that we make this one unique in the sense of it will fail, like, or that you'll get bad things that happen as a result. Well, look at what we're living through, guys.

Starting point is 00:34:23 Maybe we should give it a shot, you know? Maybe it's like I'm kind of being facetious when I say that. I do believe that. But with that logic, it's like, why don't we try the one thing that we haven't given a shot yet as we're literally living through another failure? You know, it's, but not every American sees it that way. In this system, social organization is achieved through decentralized decision-making. conscious-based processes, mutual aid and community-based problem-solving,

Starting point is 00:34:46 horizontal networks of autonomous groups rather than top-down command. And again, it's up for you to decide. Maybe you want none of that and you start your own community. This is the idea of how this works. Now, overlapping that with the illusion, which I'm not going to get into as well today, but you know because I've talked about it, the network state agenda, that is a group in the government arena that we're talking about, the technocratic side of it, who are trying to take advantage of that idea.

Starting point is 00:35:09 because if you truly look into these things, Prosper, Prospera, any of them, Praxia, the sea-steading, it's all ties back to the same inner circle of people, right in Trump's inner circle, and clearly they do not believe the core point. It's a CEO-run country, so it's not about self-governance. You have to understand. They're using people. That's what Trump used when he said libertarians, except now she wants you to believe they're all terrorists. Now, I like this one.

Starting point is 00:35:33 Now, this is an Emma Goldman quote. Same kind of point. People always go, well, do you know what Emma Goldman was a part of it? Why is that, first of all, relevant? Second is just a statement, and that could mean things whether or not she said it. Secondarily, just because, again, she is an anarchist. It has, you know, kind of the founding element of this idea. Doesn't mean that's what everybody else has to believe, or rather the sense, do.

Starting point is 00:35:55 If she's out there did bad things in her life, that doesn't mean every anarchist will do them. It's weird that we ever have to go through those simple things, but so many people fall for these logic traps. Anarchism stands for the liberation of the human mind. from the dominion of religion and liberation of the human body from the coercion of property. Liberation from the shackles and restraint of government. It stands for the social, a social order based on the free grouping of individuals. Now, is that going to have problems? Yep, just like we have here.

Starting point is 00:36:25 But doesn't that sound like something that is possible? I argue yes. And I'd like to believe in most Americans, if you were really laid this out in a clear way, would go, yeah, man, that sounds like what they promised us, you know? And it's clearly. But even the point of religion, for example, some people push back. It's not about saying you don't get religion. It's about the idea that you're freed from the dominion of these structures, right?

Starting point is 00:36:47 The mainstream Catholicism that doesn't actually half the time believe the things they put out. Look at all these different pedophile priests, right? But it doesn't mean all of them. But simply understanding that you're freed from these dominion of these hierarchical structures. That's the main point. To me, screams obvious. continuing. It says when somebody argues anarchy would leave people defenseless, even though we just went through, that's the literal opposite. All the people still,

Starting point is 00:37:15 even the ones that were in government just before we stopped it, are still there. They still exist. The military still exists. Now, whether or not you want it to be an organized group or not is up for the community. The point we've seen, it's just complicated. People always go, oh, I'll just vote then. That seems stupid to me. Let's avoid the difficult and go for the easy. but the point being is that clearly there are still people that can defend themselves. There are still people with guns and still people that, you know, can gather and collect and defend the community. But it says, French makes the collective position even clearer.

Starting point is 00:37:45 He says, you're on the record, as you heard, opposing that the rest of this crowd, you know, that anarchy be a bad thing? Yes. The person saying they think that. In other words, thinking anarchy is bad, she says, puts you in the opposite of the rest of the libertarian crowd. Not necessarily. That's a really stupid all or nothing perspective.

Starting point is 00:38:01 He's simply saying that in this room, we agree that anarchy is something we're because he understands, I argue, what the real meaning is. But that still doesn't mean that everybody in another room over there feels the same. But this is how people in this false binary political team sport politics, it's just they're very limited in the way they see things. It's all or nothing, left or right, and they've been trained that way. Or it's all dishonest trying to make you ignore this. I don't know.

Starting point is 00:38:24 In other words, thinking anarchy is bad puts you in the opposite of the rest of the libertarian crowd. Hans Herman Hope, leading libertarian anarcho capitalist philosopher at the Mises Institute, founder of the property of Freedom Society called the American Army a laughing stock. Well, look around, ladies and gentlemen.

Starting point is 00:38:40 Stephen Kinsella, libertarian theory. Oh, and then here, the idea that that would then mean something other than he's just acknowledging what he can see is your opinion. Maybe he's derisit.

Starting point is 00:38:49 Maybe he hates it. Maybe he wants to see it fall down. Or maybe he just acknowledges that we can all see that. And that's relevant to the fact that we're not living under this control structure that they frame or that we don't have to anyway.

Starting point is 00:38:59 Now it says, they say they need to develop fair and esoteric, you know, the areas that he wants to develop are fairly esoterror. Excuse me. And he says, and hope tells the audience the general IQ is going down, while the few people who still have high IQ have a greater responsibility to preserve and spread these ideas.

Starting point is 00:39:16 Now, here's an interesting difference. Who knows if they mean these things either. That's always just like, who knows if the technocratic maniac believe what they say. Question it. But what's interesting is general IQ is going down defined. I mean, guys, it's verifiable. You look at the studies, look at the, you know, so it's, I guess this is an example of one of them, but ultimately,

Starting point is 00:39:36 the few people who have high IQ have a responsibility to control, to run the government? No, to spread ideas. I find that to be a very important difference on the way these people talk about things. Now, again, like I said, maybe they're lying, you know, whatever. But if you're talking about people who have, you know, the power, the wherewithal, the resources to spread ideas, that's never a bad thing in my opinion.

Starting point is 00:40:01 If we understand that you have a right to go, I don't want to hear it, I'm going to go over here. It's ideas or it's free speech, it's freedom of ideology. The fact that we've even gotten to a place in this country or pretend like that's somehow no longer allowed in this box or with this word, you're just being played, guys. Even if you think those things are bad, you either are of the mind that you have a right to think those things or not, whatever those things may be. And if you argue that you don't have a right to think or say those things, then you are lost if you still believe in what you pretend you do when it comes to the Constitution, founding ideas of this country. So having a greater responsibility to preserve and spread ideas is absolutely what I would agree with when it comes to people who believe they see something that others don't, right? Whether it doesn't mean you're smart or not, or smarter or not.

Starting point is 00:40:44 Some people see things that others don't. Very important. They truly believe they're smarter than the masses. Now, is that what they said? You can listen to it. You can argue, and I'm sure they do think they're very smart. But here's the thing, though, guys. You know, it's the same kind of point, right? Do you not think that Trump and his team think they're smarter than everybody else? Obviously they do. And if you ask her, she'd probably go because they are, you know. And it's just this, it's that one-sided view of the world where anybody against Trump is now a monster terrorist who wants to bring on the country. And it's just, this is alarming because these people are real. Whether this is real or not, they do exist. Anarchy is the objective. Again, yes, which means not rulers, not chaos, which is the only thing they can see.

Starting point is 00:41:26 And a military is a laughing stock, obviously real. And they are in light. And they, they, they, are the enlightened high IQ class entrusting with preserving esoteric knowledge. What? Think about that ridiculous framing after what they just said. I have some ideas that are fairly esoteric becomes we're entrusted with the esoteric knowledge. Like, my God. I mean, it shows you a lack of understanding, quite frankly.

Starting point is 00:41:47 But this exact framing is identical to what the technocratic, elitist, theocratic direction. That's what they believe. They think they are prophets of the new. society, read their books. Clearly they haven't. Notice any through line amongst these prominent political media voices tied to broader Mises Rothbard Hope ecosystem and enlist off all these people. You want to tell me Ron Paul wants to see things burn down? You want to tell me any of these people are out there going, burn it all down. They're not. I mean, I mean, Tom Woods, I mean, I don't think any of them are. I would just say that that's probably the person I'm

Starting point is 00:42:27 least familiar with. But I am familiar. But the point is all of them, in my experience, are out there active, avidly fighting for limited government, exactly, for less government intrusion into our lives. At least, I mean, some of them you could argue ostensibly, but either way, it's true. Which podcast do they frequent? Who is platforming them? Oh, good. So now we're getting into where they shouldn't be platformed anymore.

Starting point is 00:42:51 Talk about freedom again. And now, again, that's just my opinion, not what it actually says. I'm objective to point that out. They're very open about where they want to take. things, the youth. So, I mean, this is, again, if you're talking about a battleground of changing ideas, the youth is always the vocal point. Let me ask you something. If you're talking about educating the youth on understanding these ideas versus indoctrated them to think that only one way is the future, which one sounds alarming to you? Pretty simple. The Mesa Institute says TikTok and

Starting point is 00:43:18 Instagram are the most important arenas. It sounds, you know, just like everybody out there trying to propagandize people. I don't necessarily agree with the idea of like these campaigns to influence ideas, but people out the society the way things work today this is how people just think things operate it's i mean there's plenty of to criticize my i want to drive the opposite direction of this weird social media digital direction that we're going in nonetheless if you're in their position and you think you need to fight for these ideas that's probably what you would do criticize it like you should anybody the ron paul scholars program recruits college students for foreign policy and civil college students i mean this is a weird thing you're trying to make into something dark so

Starting point is 00:43:57 when this network targets young Americans through war, Israel, foreign policy, distrust of the government, endless grievance against the establishment. Yeah, like 90% of Americans, by the way, understand the ideology behind the sales pitch. What? What is exactly the ideology you're selling here? Some kind of dark, dystopian enda. They're literally saying you should be free and not have to deal with government, and you're fighting them. Think about that for a second. Here's the part they somehow don't understand. Let us let her wax intellectual here for a minute. You represent roughly one percent to the electorate for a reason. I mean, see, this is where it gets really embarrassing.

Starting point is 00:44:29 How in the world do we think we know any of this stuff? So the very structures that are lying to us are the ones that are going to rightly, going to accurately break down for us what the representation is of a group they don't want us to know exists? Yeah, good luck with that. I mean, guys, we can't take polls at face value.

Starting point is 00:44:45 We can't take the reason. Clinton's going to win, 99%. Yeah, but let's pretend like we know that there's only 1% of people that exist within multiple categories, libertarianism, anarchism, volunteerism. That's just stupid. In fact, I'm arguing that it's like a majority of the population has some overlap with these groups today,

Starting point is 00:45:03 especially, well, just ideology today, especially because of what's changing. You have never built a governing majority. Well, that's what I said earlier, because these things are, I mean, you can't even barely get a conversation about any third part. You know, long, those have been around,

Starting point is 00:45:16 green, whatever else. They've all been co-opted and manipulated. That's not the point, though, is that they make sure that these things never see the light of day. The system is built on making the status quo or maintaining. So that doesn't make a fair point to me. And historically speaking, there are plenty of examples where these things are clearly represented in society.

Starting point is 00:45:34 They just don't like to highlight it. And it says you are not going to co-op MAGA and turn it into an anarchist project built on, get this, hatred, grievance, and contempt. That's what she thinks this is. So, Ron Paul, Scott Horton, Thomas Massey, Andrew Napolitano, Dave, Daniel McAdams. Yeah, they're all about hatred, grievance, and contempt. Really? So this is what I really stress on this, guys. Not only is that the, like, attack on one of the most obvious directions that we should be taking,

Starting point is 00:46:00 not chaos and fighting and burning things down, but simply self-governance, less government control, if not zero. And they want you to think it's hatred, grievance, and contempt. What are you guys doing? You're literally attacking, hating, hating people that have different ideas. You're literally, I mean, everything you're outlining, you're basically pointing it yourself. The people on that stage were doing the opposite, in my opinion. But think about for a second, somebody who has in a picture,

Starting point is 00:46:23 woman for Trump. She thinks freely and what she's doing is attacking somebody for simply believing in a different ideology. Go ahead and walk me through, lady, how that's American.

Starting point is 00:46:35 Maga's not your vehicle. America's not of your experiment. Anyway, you get the point, guys. I mean, what's crazy is if she's the real person, she's pointing at people that are fighting for her while the very thing she's a part of

Starting point is 00:46:49 is exactly what she's outlining. Not the sense of fighting for quit. maybe even that, by the way. When we understand what they're doing in this country, which we'll get into financially in a second, what Israel is doing in this country, maybe not anarchy, but chaos maybe really is their objective.

Starting point is 00:47:04 But here she is advocating for why we should be attacking anybody that fights for her freedom. And of course, like I said, blocked me, and I'll include the things you can read it in case you didn't see that. But think about how lame that is, too, to be, you know, somebody challenges your idea. I didn't go, I didn't even underneath her post.

Starting point is 00:47:21 I just simply pointed out there and said, somebody want to tell her the real definition of anarchy and blocked me and wrote this. Bro, get the F out of here with that stupid S-H-I-T. Anarchy is anti-American. You traitorous piece of excrement. Well done. So having a different perspective on ideology, otherwise known as freedom of ideology, is anti-American. Maybe you should brush up on what's actually American.

Starting point is 00:47:46 But you see, this is the biggest problem, is that people like this believe they're fighting for something they don't even understand. that's like people advocating for, you know, censoring people on anti-Semitism or deporting people who have a legal right to be and acting like you understand the Constitution. It's just sad. The bigger point here, guys, is that this is important in a sense of how we can change what we're living through. Now, off that note, what you're getting of a lot of these people, whether that's one of or not, is a lot of fake, ridiculous, you know, divisive content. Now, again, I don't know whether that's what that was.

Starting point is 00:48:19 Maybe she believes those things. but I think it's important to see that there's an entire element of this. And right now it's very much focused on one side. And I think actually take a step back and think about what that shows you. Do you notice that you don't see like a massive coordinated like Democrat campaign? They're out there. But not the visible way that we're seeing all of these huge Republican commentators on Twitter and elsewhere. Why, in my opinion?

Starting point is 00:48:43 Because it's all one thing. And right now what they want you looking at is the Republican momentum or lack thereof. and then during COVID-19, what did we see? The exact opposite. You have all Republicans going, you're bad and you're doing bad things and we're the freedom ones. Now it's exactly the way around.

Starting point is 00:48:59 You've got all the Democrats going, you're terrible and you're destroying the country and none of them even care. All people that voted for the big, beautiful bill are out there going 40 trillion, the debt. How dare we let this happen? You did it. So my point is, guys,

Starting point is 00:49:12 there's a lot of fake stuff out there, clearly, but there are people that buy it, but just realize that there's an effort right now. now, which I know most of you know, to just aggressively gaslight you, in my opinion, to just get you to hesitate right now. But whether I'm right about that or not, it's about trying to distract you from what's really going on. As you all know, this is interesting.

Starting point is 00:49:30 Ashley St. Clair, which is Elon Musk's, you know, whatever they call it, you know, baby mama. That was just the headline that somebody put out. All of MAGA is paid and they coordinate their messaging in lockstep via group chats. Now, I don't think that's any different than the other side. I think that really, as my point goes, I think it's just the way our government. operates. And this is the way they keep us teeter tottering and balanced on so we don't focus on the fact that we never get what's promised. So we're always pointing at the other side. It's very simple. All of these people came to the conclusion that after what they saw,

Starting point is 00:50:02 and this was the, was it the world health, which, I forget the acronym, basically that their thought was that Trump needs his ballroom. The white, what is it? Oh, I'm thinking of the wrong one. Anyway, the point is the ballroom is what she's highlighting here. But there's plenty of examples in this. And what she's talking about is the fact that the, moment that they realize, they think that Trump needs this, he's in danger. They just coordinated and bulrushed the narrative. The first thought was Trump needs the ballroom. One of the main group chats in which they coordinate the messaging is literally called

Starting point is 00:50:28 fight, fight, fight, fight. Now, is that even unique? No, guys. Literally all of these people, and I would argue other, maybe out of the side of like a Jack Posobic who I clearly think is some kind of coordinator. Either way, these people in many cases believe that they're doing the right thing. Even lying to you is the right thing because we're fighting the evil Democrats. You see how broken that becomes and the Democrats do the same thing.

Starting point is 00:50:51 Now, at some higher level, I think people know that they're just being dishonest, but a lot of active people in this who are willing to lie and cheat and steal believe they're doing it all for some higher cause. That is the worst misdeception of all this because people are doing the worst things fighting against their own interest while thinking they're doing it for the same thing they're fighting for. Or rather, I said that wrong, that they're doing it against their own interest when they think they're fighting for those interests. And this is, of course, after Trump's attempt on Trump's life at Butler. Yeah, because we're still pretending that's what happened. I mean, utterly ridiculous. So keeping that in mind, even from Elon Musk's relation,

Starting point is 00:51:26 there's things like this going around. Now, this one has been denied by Nick Shirley. It's not, there's, there's nothing definitive. Let's put it that way. The title was, leak magafiles, spark claims Nick Shirley's viral rise to secretly engineered by the White House. Now, it's not definitive. To be clear on that, you can read through it, it's pretty clear that it's basically

Starting point is 00:51:43 a connection, sort of like the Biden's auto pen. Well, we know he's senile, therefore. we know he couldn't have. Well, that's not proof. That's your opinion, and you could be wrong, even though logical. The point in this is that they are, they, they claim that the timing of this in regard to when the White House literally used his first post about Somali fraud, Minnesota, and then bulrush this entire thing based on what we can now literally prove, in the moment we were proving, they were basically using a construct to manipulate how they conducted their operations. What did I tell you right at the beginning? Well, the program they're pointing to really much was

Starting point is 00:52:14 about fraud, except it was dealt with largely during Biden's administration, where many people actually went to jail. And there was not really much more they discovered post that in this situation. They just simply used that to act like they discover this whole big thing, but it was based on somewhat something real. So it was hard for people to decipher. And ultimately, they did walk up to random daycare is going, let me see your children. Like, what in the hell, guys? This guy, look, if anybody who was intelligent enough can see that this kid didn't have any ability to actually, you could listen to him talk, guys. I mean, it's like looking at like John Federman and pretending like you know he wrote some novel.

Starting point is 00:52:48 He did not. Okay, it's obvious, in my opinion, I could be wrong. The point here is that clearly the timing of it was very suspect and it was built off of what he did. And all of a sudden, he's popping up in Spain and all these same things. It's just very strange to me. But my either, whether it's not, it was coordinated by the White House, I believe a lot of this is wildly engineered and look at what happened in the Minnesota conversation. Look what happened in a ton of these conversations. I mean, just even a larger step back, which we're kind of generally pointing to here. I mean, think about where we are with Trump. Think about all. I mean, look what Alex Jones now calling him a globalist. Think about that for a second. And then ask yourself, what about someone like Roseanne Barr or Alex the entire time until he suddenly turned? What do you have? How can we stand back and go, oh, they're just honest or intelligent people? Okay, so they were either lying the whole time or it's too dumb to see it because it didn't

Starting point is 00:53:35 change, guys. It wasn't suddenly now. I'll make the point about Marjorie Taylor Green. Suddenly you saw through him. What about Stargate on day one? You didn't see through that? These people are all dishonest. The fraud, the, the, the, the, the, the, the, the, the, the, the, the, the, the, the, the, the, the,

Starting point is 00:53:48 the, fraud is the wrong word for it. It is fraud. It's fraudulent. But all of this fake political outrage about the debt or whatever else, it's just everything in this system is so obviously fraudulent. And it's standing out to people everywhere. My audience knows this. Guys, you've been talking about forever.

Starting point is 00:54:08 But it's becoming very clear. And the reason I think I'm trying to put momentum around this is because average people are beginning to see this. This is just an interesting overlap. Republican, Florida Republican could face death penalty after allegedly molesting grandson under new law he voted for. Now, again, this is up in the air, but it's pretty wild. The kid himself is the one who's admitting all this and admitting that they went to some theme park and he took him for ice cream and they molested him and then did it again on Thanksgiving.

Starting point is 00:54:38 And like, so the kid could be making it up. That's always possible. But it's pretty weird. And so it could also be some political attack. How do you get some young kid in his family to do that? It's hard to not, it's hard not to believe. But we should question it as much as that's uncomfortable, just like Israel and the rape allegations, right? It's important to do that.

Starting point is 00:54:56 But here's the interesting thing about this is one is that clearly you're not getting a lot of attention on this. Where are all the Republicans talking about pedophiles, you know, it's weird how you suddenly don't care about this. Same thing I would say about the left when they don't do it. But the point is that this guy is a Republican in Florida who passed a law about basically giving the death penalty to people that molest children under 12. And then goes on to molest to children under 12. I mean, if that's what happened, and it does seem that way to me based on it, you can read it all for yourself, is that ultimately you have a guy who is knowingly willing to molest people, if that's the truth, and goes on to pass a law to basically cover that that's who he is. This is politics, guys. The sociopaths gravitate towards this, if not psychopaths.

Starting point is 00:55:38 The point I've always made, if you look at the general prevalence in society of psychopathy, sociopathy, the percentage eerily lines up with the percent. eerily lines up with the percentage of people in politics. I've been saying that in my entire career. Look right now, it'll blow your, it's, it's, I think it's interesting. I think it, I think you just get created a job for sociopaths. They can run your lives. That's what they want to do anyway. Anyway, so that's, that's another example of just a, a two-faced fraudulent politician

Starting point is 00:56:05 that's literally everywhere. Now, excuse me, in the conversation of anarchy, there's nobody better to talk to or to look into to read the books of to discuss the illusion of authority and what anarchism actually means than someone like Lark and Rose. Here's an interview we did. The illusion of authority and the collapse of the two-party paradigm. He was seeing this as well in 2024, recognizing that people were seeing through it. Even he acknowledged a bigger interest in ideas that he's been fighting to get attention

Starting point is 00:56:36 on his entire career and sees more when I talked to him then than ever. It's not a secret, guys. which people could acknowledge it and stop, you know, being shouted down by people who act like you're just being hopeful or hopium. You know, I think if there is level of hope, hope, hopium is not hope. You should have hope. Have hope that things will go the way you want them to. Hopium is but letting that hope guide your decisions as if it's the reality.

Starting point is 00:57:00 But realize that it's there. I've been saying for a long time, there is a change happening right now and people are starting to see these things that they happen for a very long time. And if we, if we hesitate, we'll miss the opportunity. So in the idea of the fraudulent element, the first few things really do line up with that very same point. Trump temporarily waives, higher beef tariffs, and a bid to lower prices. Well, this is just funny. And everyone's making this point as if this somehow proved it to you.

Starting point is 00:57:27 What do we tell anybody with, anybody with the basic understanding of how these things always go told you what? You will pay the cost. And weird how that's ended up being the reality. And all these insiders and all these fake maggot people. screaming about how you don't understand it all. And yep, here we are. And that's not this point. That was when they clearly recognized that you were paying.

Starting point is 00:57:48 And then they gave them refunds and gave the company's refunds, even though they raised their prices to meet the demand and you still pay those prices today. So they all, I argue to some level there was a coordinated element there. But now Trump comes around after screaming that your tariffs don't make you pay more. You guys are fake news conspiracy theory. Then says, well, guess what? I'll lower those tariffs to lower the prices. Oh, okay.

Starting point is 00:58:10 so they literally directly correlate with the price. But you know this, guys. You didn't need them to tell you today. You already knew it because it's self-evident if you looked into how they operate. Or if you watch this show, right when this first started, at least with Trump's current iteration of this. And before. Oh, I forget, I don't think I had much highlighted in here. Bottom line was that it says Trump announced Friday that he will waive higher tariffs on ground beef

Starting point is 00:58:34 in a bid to lower prices for consumers who are facing historically high beef costs. Why? Because of him. or just, let's just say, the U.S. government, because there's plenty of actions from before with Biden that add to it as well. But right now, it's very much, it's largely because of what is currently happening

Starting point is 00:58:49 with the straight and other actions he's taken before this, specifically in regard to beef, guys. Yeah, there was something else, but I'll leave it there because it's just we go on from that. But here, I'm just laughing about this. Here's Peter Schiff, Chief economist, Global Strategy, comes out and says, that was this morning, Trump proudly announced the deal

Starting point is 00:59:07 to lower beef prices by reducing quotas and tariffs and imported beef, but that's also an admission that tariffs increased prices by America. for moving those tariffs, lower prices than imposing them must raise price. My mind is blown. You know, it's my point the same. August 21, you didn't need Adam, Peter Schiff, excuse me, to tell you that. You could have pieced that together with your basic due diligence on what tariffs

Starting point is 00:59:26 how they operate, what historical realities have been, and understand that or watch the show as we were telling you and walking through it. But bombshell, Peter Schiff broke down the inside, you know, this is what you get. It's just funny to me. But Mr. Sausid points out in regard to this very point, Foxxie, news says president trump announces his new push to lower ground beef he says today i concluded a deal to substantially lower the price of ground beef for working american families as everyone knows under president biden of course that's where it all starts beef prices sword at their well guys

Starting point is 00:59:56 everything did under the covid 19 time frame and so this is what this government is this administration is using aggressively and trump played into that just like anybody else but yeah it's still it's i'm not taking biden side bite is just as corrupt and accountable as trump the point is pointing to what happened during COVID that they were all part of as if that makes what you're doing now somehow a huge win is a lie. Because ultimately what you would aim at if you want to make it a win is what it was before COVID-19 spiked everything. And even then, I understand that he still has to come down from that, but realize that it's, you know, it's like the gas price is going up more than double and then going down a dollar. And he's like, oh my God, everything's amazing. Well,

Starting point is 01:00:34 it's still up from where it was before. It's just, it's anybody smart enough could have seen through that. So he says that they soared the fastest rate of the American beef herd felt, who, with smallest size in modern history. As we worked, and it goes back a long time for many different narratives of pandemics or, you know, any number of things where they're calling herds for different reasons. As we work to rebuild this herd and help our ranchers, by the way, most of them are calling Trump out right now, farmers, ranchers, most of them, as far as I can tell, for the next 90 days. The United States will allow up to 300,000 metric tons of product for ground beef. Oh, good, so 90 days, some cheap prices. Then we'll go right back to it. That'll work out. And it says,

Starting point is 01:01:08 we have a commitment that this beef will be sold at 25% below current market price. Oh, so now you're controlling the price? What's that called again? Do we talk about that? You know, it's just, it's just silly. On top of that, why would he have the ability to tell these companies what they can sell them for? They're probably going to not follow that lead anyway because they don't legally have to do what he tells them to when it comes to the price setting. He'll probably, he'll probably attack their companies like he does with everything else. But it says this deal will reduce prices for Americans while giving space for our grand American beef for her to grow again. Okay, so he's taking action that's led to this, like directly. And then 90 days of some lower tariffs that you also created and act like

Starting point is 01:01:44 that's going to bring some kind of change. It's a momentary blip. And that's even if it comes to pass. This is a truth social post. He's done tons of these things that don't even end up happening. But Mr. Sausage says, just in time for the midterms, where was this in the past year and a half? Isn't that the point? If this has been going up, why wouldn't you have done this at any other point? because his agenda was more important in that moment than you and your prices, as he's told you many times, as I'll show you right here. But as Mr. Sausage, sausage writes, and I agree, everything they do is artificial. Artificial is a good word for it.

Starting point is 01:02:19 Here is what he said when asked about the Iran War back in May. You guys saw it at the time. I played it for you. The only thing that matters when I'm talking about Iran, they can't have a new clue. Not even a little bit. What, how, you know, to what degree are you thinking about a minute? American interest when dealing with this, meaning that we know that what you're doing affects our prices at home. As you told us, the straight, everything. Not even a little bit, he says.

Starting point is 01:02:56 Now, of course, as I said at the time, that's Trump just going, I'm tough and strong and I don't care at all. I trust what I'm doing. But then goes on to make statements about how we care. So it's, he wants to bolster in front of the press. But at the same time, he said it out loud. So it matters. He said, not even a little bit. I don't think, and frankly, I think that's more the truth than anything. He does not consider your needs at all. And this is a placation. Here's 90 days of some slightly lesser prices. They probably won't really develop because they'll keep the prices up and ultimately, I mean, I don't want to watch. It's a prediction. It's a thought. Watch. I believe it won't actually change that much. And even if it does,

Starting point is 01:03:32 it won't change enough to make a difference from where it was before we got here. I hope I'm wrong, as always. I mean, I don't want it. I don't want this to be a problem for Americans. But if it is, it's because of the government that has allowed this. Now, in a totally separate story that's completely unrelated. A heartbreaking investigation revealed that Trump's Bureau of Land Management is systematically, excuse me, I don't always do that, rounding up thousands of Americans wild horses and quietly selling them off to buyers who are shipping them to slaughterhouses. That seems completely unrelated. Before the U.S. government rarely sold wild horses, but since Trump took office, government sales have more than doubled. Slaughterhouses pay up to $750 for wild horse.

Starting point is 01:04:14 That's disgusting. The fact that it's even happening is disgusting. The fact that it says, the Bureau of Land Management is nominally in charge of protecting these 73,000. Yep, that's all that's left. 73,000 are so wild horses who roam America's public lands in the West. But yeah, let's round him up and kill him because why? Why not? Anyway, let's tear down the forest. Let's let's use all this public land. It's just, who cares? I mean, guys, that's not a joke. This current administration, more than I've ever seen is just, you know, signing executive orders to bring down rainforest or to get rid of endangered species or to, and you may not care about any of that. But the point is, these things have a very real effect on the way that the world operates, or specifically in this country when you come to ecosystems, but it really has a global

Starting point is 01:04:58 effect when you're talking about species extinction. But on top of that, though, the idea that you're just rounding them up and killing them for what? For money? But of course, I'm kind of joking. The Bureau of sending our wild horses to the slaughterhouse is the truth, according to the New York Times. I'm kind of being facetious when I try to not say but say that it's connected to the beef point. I'm kind of joking. But I mean, think about the weird overlap. I just thought that was disgusting. You're sending horses to the slaughterhouse and suddenly we've got cheap beef.

Starting point is 01:05:26 I doubt that's what's happening. But overall, it's just a gross reality of what these people are doing. I imagine Republicans, Democrats, anybody who just has a, you know, why is this what we're okay with? What is the, why do you get the right to just execute horses in the, in the, in the, in, the wild to make some money. Doesn't that show you how desperate they are? 73,000. Do the math. That's not even that much money, guys. Or they want the land for something, probably data centers. I mean, there's only a few ways this goes. Now, on Fox News, what are you doing to bring the beef prices down? Fox asks, because clearly we know that that's

Starting point is 01:06:06 part of what's happening. What are you doing to counteract that? Well, you won't be surprised about the answer. By asking you what the Department of Agriculture is doing to bring beef prices down for Americans. Well, first of all, Jackie, is so great to be on with you again. Thank you so much for having me. Listen, what we are facing in America today is the direct result of a war on cattle by the previous administration. Frankly, a war. Right. And that's exactly why when we started Trump's administration, that's where the prices, oh, no, no, that's not what was the case. They went up after what's been going on, but somehow it's only responsive what Biden did from before. Well, look, yes, that has an effect on where we are. But the prices when Trump took over to now is what we're discussing.

Starting point is 01:06:48 There was a guy in front of a bunch of working class people out there screaming about how the issue with water and everything else is because of what they shut down in the power plants. You know, and it's so willfully dishonest. And it's so, so too, as any, are any of the rest of them. Biden lied through his teeth when he was out there. They're all the same. That's the point. they're fraudulent, they're artificial. But the idea that you just kick the kid, it's Biden did it. A year and a half into your administration,

Starting point is 01:07:13 you're pretending like the price. It's just, it's, this is how stupid they believe we are. Or how desperate they are, you can decide. It just kills me. As she writes,

Starting point is 01:07:26 Patriotic wants zero accountability. Okay, here's Rick Scott. Our national debt just hit $40 trillion. That's true. That's, I mean, unprecedented when it comes to debt, when it comes to, I mean, Trump is breaking all the records in the wrong way, especially when it comes to what he promised you.

Starting point is 01:07:43 But it's all Biden's fault somehow. Or just as soon as we get done with the Iran war is all going to tow him back down. No, it won't, guys. This is bad, he writes. Congress needs to get spending under control and blanch this budget balance, excuse me. Americans deserve better. Oh, by the way, Vakjack, Rex Gott voted for the one big, beautiful bill, which raised the statutory debt limit by $5 trillion, and is projected by CBO to increase deficits by,

Starting point is 01:08:08 3.4 trillion over 10 years. But yeah, keep telling us why we need to do. If you cared, you wouldn't have voted for that. Or if you want to look at a different way, you could argue that he had no choice because the bill, because of the broken system, I argue it's more the last, the former, but that the broken system is done is like they only have one choice. Like for like the NDAA, like this is the idea that these people, you either pass the things that include some of the stuff that you want for your constituents or you don't at all. And so they do it. But that includes. and 219 and whatever else.

Starting point is 01:08:40 I mean, who knows what it is? The end of the day, whether the system is broken so they can't do it or not. That's my point. Either it's broken beyond repair because they can't change it if they wanted to,

Starting point is 01:08:48 or they're also corrupt. They don't care. You take your pick. I still argue the change is needed. And you get the same thing from all of them. And it's not unique to left or right, guys.

Starting point is 01:08:58 Here's Nancy Mace. And this is Dave Benner. He says, Republican Party in a nutshell, my entire life. Well, guess what? Exactly the same from the Democrats. Nancy May says,

Starting point is 01:09:08 just voted on the one big beautiful bill. It was yes. And she wrote yes, sorry. Nancy Mace. So that was July 3rd. And then July, this is last year, right? And then July 1st this year. We have nearly $40 trillion in debt.

Starting point is 01:09:21 Republicans and Democrats did that. Oh, you're so brave and you're so insightful. Right. She's trying to play into the thing like, I see it all. They're all corrupt. Well, you're one of them. Okay. And you're one of the most dishonest in this.

Starting point is 01:09:32 You're so obviously a blind supporter of the team, but try to play it as you're not. And they're all doing this. They're all out there doing their dance around this. And I mean, I think Massie even called them out. Like, look, if you're out there pretending to care about this and you voted for this, shut up. Paraphrasing.

Starting point is 01:09:47 Okay, here, as you might have seen going around, because it is also relevant. And this is an important part. I want to stress, I don't believe it's important that we need to expose Trump as a fraud or dishonest. Or I think everybody sees it. Even the one still choosing to support him because it's just that obvious. I say things like that a lot over the years. And my track record is very.

Starting point is 01:10:06 very, very good. And I said this in January about what he's doing now and I think I'm right. I think we can prove that. I think I'm right about this now. In any case, my point saying that, I don't think I need to continue to go, oh, here, he challenged this. I will as it's relevant. But I believe that ship is sailed. I think this person is, everyone sees him. Nonetheless, it's important to highlight this as a fraud, fraudulent artificial moment where Trump steps up. And I think actually says probably what he meant at the time. But now doesn't care, which is that if we pass 24, trillion in debt, the whole country's going down. Well, here we are at 40 trillion. So as truth, Sol Joss says, national debt will balloon further as the Pentagon Awards fat

Starting point is 01:10:47 contracts to war profiteers to restock supplies depleted by wars and Iran and Ukraine. You know, the ones that Ukraine and everything else, he said he would end, actually told you that it was ended and concluded it in his tally, and it's still going on like all the rest, and to develop and deploy new advanced weapon systems. With Israel, that was the main part about the AI autonomous drones and quantum. and all the different things are getting involved in. The Empire's global war machine has bankrupted America, but there's no end in sight. So here's the contrast.

Starting point is 01:11:14 Also take note of the way Trump speaks. You'll notice it. Listen to what you hear from him today. His kind of rambling, nonsensical, like, not just, you know, what's the word, where it's just kind of like thought pops in his head and he jumps to it. That's how it used to be too. But where today, it's like he can't even get back. I think it's because he's getting older, which that's just, that's everybody.

Starting point is 01:11:36 know anyone getting there, whether Biden or Trump, but there's an element of it that makes you question, like with Biden, whether there's something else. Because there's a very clear decline here in the way he speaks, the way his train of thought goes, and you'll see what I mean when you play this video. We really do have to get going. Because if we have another three or four years, you know, we're at 18 trillion now. We're soon going to be at 20 trillion. According to the economists, who I'm not big believers in, but nevertheless, this is what they're saying, that $24 trillion, we're very close. That's the point of no return.

Starting point is 01:12:17 $24 trillion. We will be there soon. That's when we become a country that's when we become a country that's unsalvageable. Well, Donald Trump, we seem to share an opinion there. And we're going to be there very soon. We're going to be there very soon. And he did that too. He did that too, just like all the rest.

Starting point is 01:12:39 And now we're at $40 trillion. Think about what he's saying. And we're at $40 trillion. So if this was such a big and important problem, why didn't he stop it at $30 trillion? You already know the answer. You can choose to blight to yourself if that makes you sleep better at night. The truth is, guys, these people don't care about us.

Starting point is 01:12:57 They really do not. And this is like the clip that Steve plays with Charlie, you know, hates me the bear of bad news, but your government hates you. You know, that's, we need to understand the reality of this power dynamic. Otherwise, we're never really going to change anything. As Patriotic Blonde also points out, the U.S. has added, get this. And the charts here for you to check out, $550 billion to the national debt since July 1st. That's over $13 billion a day.

Starting point is 01:13:25 Do the math on dividing up $13 billion just amongst, you know, like, well, I actually, I was going to say amongst Americans. I mean, do that. That would shock you. But take the reality that, you know, $40 trillion is just such an insane number. But realize how much money that is and what that could do to any number of locations. Or, I mean, you know, the end of the day, that's how much money a day is being added to the debt so they can go on doing things that Americans do not want. Just like COVID-19, like the Iran War, like Stargate, like everything else, either side, or rather all of your government is doing.

Starting point is 01:14:01 Ryan Grimm points out, or rather highlights the Cabici letter, which says on the 19th, it's official. On July 31st, we called for the U.S. government intervention as long-term borrowing costs hit 2008 levels. So for those new to that, that's the collapse, right? That's the subprime mortgage collapse that ultimately created a borderline economic global catastrophe. And then they bailed them out. said, fix it, and they gave themselves bonuses instead. And then what most people don't talk about is that right after that. And I mean, I almost cussed for some reason, right after that.

Starting point is 01:14:42 It was like immediately back to everything they were doing before. And I mean, this is so crazy. I made this point right afterward, or technically it would have been, I thought, was doing that. It was, no, it wouldn't have been then. Anyway, I remember making this point when it was kind of that was coming back around, maybe the anniversary or something. But the point was ultimately saying, look, you can list these things off.

Starting point is 01:15:01 and go down the list of what people argue. They caused this. And every one of them started up again and the same people. And they just named them differently. I mean, even watch the movie, they go ahead. The one, it's the big short. And right at the end, they break down how they simply just repackaged it and called to something else.

Starting point is 01:15:17 And here we are. You know, and it's just, and so it goes on to say today it happened. The U.S. Treasury is doubling buybacks to $4 billion per operation for liquidity support. What comes next? Let us explain. It says the same point they made. On July 31st, the note yield rose to 5.27%, the highest since 2007. This officially marks a plus 450 basis point rally since the low scene in the 2020 pandemic.

Starting point is 01:15:47 Even as the Fed kept interest rates paused at the July meeting, it did nothing. Yields keep climbing. By the way, as I'm reading through this, I reached out to Catherine to potentially come on. She's super busy, so it might not happen, but to come on to talk about, you know, like a larger, you know, where the, you know, just enlarger financial read on where the country is. Because there's a lot going on. And I've, I mean, we all sense there's pretty dark. But she goes on to say in regard to the yields keep climbing and says, why. First, we began speaking for the Khabisi letter that that year with market expectations for

Starting point is 01:16:20 three rate cuts in 2026. This quickly shifted to two height rates expected in 20206. Expectation shifted for rates to be 125 basis points higher in a matter of months. the 2025 global cut rate, excuse me, rate cut cycle came to a halt. It says, as the Iran War drove oil prices over 100. Now, that's important because at one point, people were adamantly arguing that over 100 would collapse the economy. Now, clearly, I think either that wasn't true or there's been measures in place because that happened a while ago.

Starting point is 01:16:48 And it was what? It was 120, 115 for a while in over the Iran War. But it says, as the Iran War drove prices to 100 plus, inflation expectations hit 5% by November. This left the Fed with no option. option but to halt rate cuts and begin considering rate rate hikes. Month over month inflation in March and April came in at plus 0.9% and plus 6% respectively. And as is today, oil prices were well below their recent highs, but remained at 55% above

Starting point is 01:17:16 pre-war levels. Furthermore, Fed expectations have shifted toward a continued pause through the end of 2026. Meanwhile, yields keep on pushing higher amid record deficit spending and inflation worries. Today's intervention by the U.S. Treasury is notable. Treasury buybacks work by repurchasing older, less liquid bonds, giving investors a steady buyer while new debt insurance continues. The goal is to improve liquidity and ease upside in yields. In other words, they blinked. This also marks the second most notable bond market intervention by the Trump administration.

Starting point is 01:17:53 In April 2025, President Trump said he was watching the bond market when he decided to announce his 90-day tariff pause. So this is now above the peak scene then. Take a look at the wording of the press release. The doubling of buybacks to $4 billion per operation is an effect from September 9th through November 4th. However, the Treasury says it will provide more information about future buybacks on November 4th. We expect more intervention. Now, just to cut to the chase and what Ryan's pointing out, are you guys seeing that?

Starting point is 01:18:25 It's literally not all there. There it goes. It wasn't let me click it. Trump is going to pump billions of dollars into the bond market to push down interest rates through the election. That's his opinion. Then let everything fall apart again. And his opinion. I agree.

Starting point is 01:18:41 Not sure I've seen a more nakedly electoral use of this amount of money before for such a targeted amount of time. Treasury announces increased sizes of nominal long end liquidity support buybacks beginning September 9th. I mean, overall, what we're looking at is these people, whether it's designed to collect, everything or simply that they're just so bad at this or so incompetent that it's happening. So it's doing that and then trying to profit here on the way down. That's what continues to seem like the most logical reality here, or as Charlie continued to put it, literally stealing the silverware for the White House. Like that's how cheap this is.

Starting point is 01:19:19 You know, how completely softmoric. But everyone sees this. And the question is why are people not, you know, at some level doing something about it? Why? Not even just this, but any number of things. The illegal war that's still going on. Why isn't Congress impeaching him? By the way, that's one thing that Sam was talking about is impeaching people who are actually breaking the law. Would not be nice.

Starting point is 01:19:40 Now, lastly, on the segment, the point about the illusion of the fraud, the artificial elements here, I think this is exactly the same thing. Now, by the way, I had an entire, a bunch of other stuff I may go into the next show about Alex Jones and the reality of his, because this is a clip from him right here with Marginle Green, And, you know, just same thing. Like, think about that. At the same point I made with Roseanne Barr. You know, they're out there right now still advocating for why Trump is the best.

Starting point is 01:20:05 You promised everything and delivered on everything. That's just, it's insane. They still have even a following when you can prove that's not true. It's a cult following like she's pointing out here. Well, then, but they were absolutely a part of this, both of them, way beyond the point when it was obvious. So are the opportunists? Are they just cowards?

Starting point is 01:20:22 You could decide. But I think it's really interesting to think about for him as well. So you didn't see Starry. that wasn't enough for you? Like you didn't see all the things up until then. And at top of that, guys, it's about right now this jumping ship moment and saying, oh, he's a globalist. Well, after the fact, even though he was caught in right now still talking like Democrats are

Starting point is 01:20:40 globalists. So it just, it's also scattered. And it seems so desperate. And I think what this leads to is both a combination of opportunism for people who are being misled by those above them, like an Alex, I argue, or people in politics who are just trying to grab on to whatever develops as the new movement that's still part of the same broken system. So let me play this clip first. Not in a cult. I am not in a cult. People that think they have to defend every single

Starting point is 01:21:08 letter or word or sentence of President Trump, if you think that's what you have to do, you are in a cult. And by the way, as much as Alex started to call him out on things throughout this, he was lockstep in the beginning of this administration. Like they all were, very hardcore Democrats trying to kill him. And we have to defend him. And we have to defend. defend him. And so that was what you were a part of. So just because you, you know, decided to break away earlier than the rest doesn't mean you weren't a part of that. But see, that has to be acknowledged. And the same goes from Argylleyer Green. You realize you, you broke with him like Iran was a huge one, right? But think about everything that happened

Starting point is 01:21:43 before that. All of the endless amounts of double crossings and lies and deceptions. I mean, again, Stargate was the first thing. An AI vaccine platform and everything else around it, that wasn't enough for you guys to realize it was the opposite direction. or the fact that he continued to support the Ukraine war, continue to support the ongoing genocide, right in the beginning, guys, right in the beginning. And then you didn't go, oh, right away, he lied. I'm broken.

Starting point is 01:22:08 I'm moving on. No, you doubled down. You backed him. You stood with him. And then only when it was in your benefit, in your interest, or when it was just way to, like, when ultimately it got to a point to where you were not gaining anymore, you suddenly broke.

Starting point is 01:22:23 That's what I see. You tell me where I'm wrong. Now, maybe at the end of the day, they now mean what they say i don't know but that's very very it speaks to their ability to see through things or when they will hide things that are countering you know they go against their interest right that at that time standing up and going trump lied would have been bad for their audience is bad for their career but now they read the writing on the wall oh well t lab's been cutting down all the weeds showing people that he's actually a fraud now that they're open to it a little bit more now i can

Starting point is 01:22:53 jump on and go that's the thing and i broke the news that's what tends to happen I am not an occult. I elected President Trump. I fought for him and put him in the White House. And again, I'll remind everybody, voted with him 98% of the time. Okay. Isn't that my point? Can we go down that 98% of the time and realize that 50% of that were things that

Starting point is 01:23:15 challenge what you claim you believe in? 50% is off top of my head. But guys, I mean, there's a ton we covered and called throughout for as well. So at the same point, recognize that you stood with him. well, you should have known better way past the point of seeing it, and then decided to call him out, which I'm still glad about, and I'll still hope that you're being true about it. But that matters to me. Put him in the White House because I believe in America first policies.

Starting point is 01:23:42 I don't believe in fighting every foreign war. I do not believe in... Then why do you support the war on, you know, I mean, at the same point. There's plenty of hypocrisy here. Calling affordability crisis. I don't believe that's a hopes. I don't believe raping 14 and 16 year olds as a hoax. Yeah, Epstein, right?

Starting point is 01:24:02 Like that wasn't a huge one. You know, realize people like Alex Jones continue to support Donald Trump through the Epstein line? How do you not call that out? So here's the point that I wanted to make off of this, right? They're talking about you're in a cult if you still support Trump. Now, that's not the MAGA movement because that's the people they're talking about believe, if they're actually honest, I don't believe they are. But the point is the people out there that still want what he pretend that he was doing.

Starting point is 01:24:28 The movement is not necessarily defined by the one who's leading it. It's a movement, guys. If the leader suddenly does the wrong thing or doesn't go with what they want, people can replace the leader. The movement is there. Now, you still may think it's illusion or dishonest or whatever. It's trapped in the partisanship, so I argue it's not going to see it through,

Starting point is 01:24:43 but it's still people that wanted parts of the things that we're talking about. And why he promised him those things is because he and they all know that we want what I'm talking about, or at least what they asked for. But that's part of what I'm talking about. So as it's Tucker and all the rest, which I'm guarantee Alex is going to glom onto, just as the next spun-off political party, or the point is, at this point,

Starting point is 01:25:04 if you still defend Trump, you're in a cult. And I said, just as the next spun-off political party or politician will be in this utterly unsalvageable corrupted system, only when we learn this long documented reality and consciously choose to get off the fraudulent uniparty hamster wheel, will we possibly move beyond this dark time.

Starting point is 01:25:24 As usual, it'll get very, very little reached because of how challenging, these things are for some, and because these platforms, in my opinion, very much suppressed. But, you know, taking this to another step, but not just Trump, but specifically the falsehood of our government, whether RFK or Trump or whoever's currently there, in this case, it's Trump and RFK Jr. This is what I said before. I can't believe that we didn't see this. This is something that Derek put out in 2020. And that interesting overlap, by the way, when this came out, we were the first people to put this out, at least as far as I can remember,

Starting point is 01:25:56 I don't know, we put it this way. I hadn't seen anybody else cover it. And we were doing it of our own volition. So whether somebody else was at the same time doing it or before, it wasn't based on somebody else's coverage. And ultimately, R.K. Jr. and Defender picked it up, published it. Then they got pushback acting like we were wrong or lying and they pulled the article. We were vindicated.

Starting point is 01:26:16 This was reality. This was proven to be the case. And I just thought it was so interesting to show that, especially with him now a part of this administration. Frankly, I just think they got enough pressure from people in the community that, you know, didn't agree. And they pulled it, but they were wrong. Vaccine bait and switch,

Starting point is 01:26:31 2020, as millions pulled from WHO back. Trump gives billions to Gates founded Gavi. And that's the simple point. They pretend everyone, everyone, all the fake mag of people out there, the ones still supporting Trump today,

Starting point is 01:26:42 the Benny Johnson types were like, yay, he did it, right? He did it, he pulled, you know, whoever was the time. I don't think that was even the case at the time. Whoever the person was, all the fake supporters were just saying,

Starting point is 01:26:51 he did it, he ended it. He ended the WHO. Well, all we showed you was he gave the money. to Gabi, which then gave the money to WHO, which is very easy to see. In fact, they gave them way more. So it amounted to an increase in amount for the WHO. Simple, right? Now, you could argue Trump didn't know that, but it was obvious that it was going in the same direction. Now with his still alignment with Davos and WHO and the Weft, he's still tap into all these things. But it happened again the next time. The beginning of this administration, what happened was they said, well, there was

Starting point is 01:27:23 a funding poll, and we were arguing that there was another way, you know, basically another kind of lie to put it as simple as possible, not to get into it all again, because there's a, there's a whole breakdown of how it went. The point was we didn't believe they were going to, and the proof is in the pudding, is that right here, as of the July 31st, I think, is when this article's from, Trump administration unfreezes $600 million for Gavi. Because in the beginning of the administration, they froze it. And everyone said, see, we told you. and we didn't believe it. Here we are. For global vaccine effort. That's very real. And Derek says, why is the Trump administration, once again, giving nearly a billion dollars to Gavi?

Starting point is 01:28:06 Bill Gates funded Gavi. It wasn't, that would have been one of the things I was going to play. I thought Alice Jones told us that now Bill Gates was going to prison. Oh, that's right. He now, he turned on Trump. So Trump's the bad guy now. Okay. Trump administration unfreezes $600 billion for Gavi. and then he adds to his article and everybody points it out. By the way, he reported on this 2020. Trump ended support for WHO while continuing the support here. Some people called it fake news. And he was right.

Starting point is 01:28:34 So here is, oh, actually, before we're going to get into the actual breakdown of it. I mean, it's really just, you know, some basic information, but I think it's important. But here, let's not forget, here is what Senator Kennedy, Secretary Kennedy, excuse me, said, Arkey Jr., about Gabby in 2025. So let this sink in. I'm going to probably play the beginning of it. And I'll read this actually about what he says, the problem with Gavi. Then we'll read the article about what they say allowed this to happen.

Starting point is 01:29:02 And you'll see that they're lying and are fraudulent and artificial yet again. In it zeal to promote universal vaccination. That is one of the main goals. Gavi, the vaccine alliance, which they've just given $600 million or $600 million, yeah, has neglected the key issue. of vaccine safety. Oh, good. Let's give them money.

Starting point is 01:29:24 When vaccine safety issues have come before Gavi, it treated them not as a patient health problem, but as a public relations problem. So that sounds like a systemic corruption problem, right? This is not even a year ago. During the COVID-19 pandemic, Gavi partnered with the WHO

Starting point is 01:29:42 to recommend best practices for social media companies to silence dissenting views and a stifle-free speech and legitimate questions during that period. Gavi should consider the best practice, best science available. Oh, you mean like gold standard using another vaccine to compare it to the vaccine

Starting point is 01:29:59 like you just did? The so-called gold standard which you're lying about. Even when that science contradicts established paradigms. Yeah, that would be great if you actually did those things. It should define success, not just in terms of the number of vaccines delivered, but on their rigorously measured overall impacts.

Starting point is 01:30:14 None of which is actually happening with Gavi. I call on Gavi to re-earn the public trust. Okay, where did that happen, RFK? where do they re-earn our trust? It didn't happen in case you're confused. And he says, and justify the $8 billion that America has provided in since 2001.

Starting point is 01:30:29 Until that happens. Until that happens, the United States won't contribute to Gavi. And then they just did, though. So we lied. Or, you know, or he doesn't, I mean, look, whether we lied or not, you think Trump cares or the system cares

Starting point is 01:30:44 what RFK Jr. has to say. He's being used. He's a face to make you think he cares about your health. even though they've challenged almost every single thing R.K ever fought for and have gone the literal opposite direction. Even the minor wins, even the food diet was ultimately rolled back to a small degree. They're really not caring guys. But the point is until that happens, we won't continue. Well, that didn't happen, RFK Jr. So an honest person would be speaking about this right now. On Twitter going, now I told you this wasn't going to happen. I don't agree with this move.

Starting point is 01:31:13 We shouldn't be doing it, but that's happening. Yeah, but you know what? Trump will then probably fire him, sue him, you know, whatever else. They're not being honest with you. Whatever the hindrance is, these people are not telling you the truth. I'm pleased to have this opportunity to address the Gavi community. We're living now in a time of upheaval, a time of popular revolt against established institutions that have lost the public trust. Yeah, you see, you see how they're tapping into what we actually feel, this kind of disillusionment of the broken system, and don't actually care about it. They love to use your momentum to drive you into their agenda.

Starting point is 01:31:49 And that includes medicine. President Trump and I are committed to earning it back. Are they? We will do that by preserving what is honest, what serves our country in the world, and we will sweep away that which is not. Okay, honest. Does that describe what you're seeing in this administration right now? Or at large, the U.S. government?

Starting point is 01:32:09 I don't care whether he meant this or not. It's just not what they're doing. A major concern that I share with the president is how the World Health Organization and Gavi partnered together during the COVID-19 pandemic to recommend best practices for social media companies to silence dissenting views, to stifle. And that never changed. There's no acknowledgement or admission or statement of why they won't do it again. Still there.

Starting point is 01:32:36 Now they're finding them again. Free speech and legitimate questions during that period. In addition, Gavi has continued to make questionable recommendations encouraging pregnant women to receive COVID-19 vaccines. Yep, which still happens. Having said that, there's much that I admire about Gavi, especially its commitment to making medicine affordable to all the world's people. Yeah, yeah, especially the commitment. People can misspeak. I do it all the time, but especially drives me crazy, especially when people say especially. Gavi has done that part of its job very well. unfortunately, in its deal to promote universal vaccination, it has neglected the key issue

Starting point is 01:33:19 of vaccine safety. When vaccines... You get the point. It goes on for four more minutes. The simple reality, guys, everything he's pointing out is a problem from what I can tell is Gavi 101 and hasn't changed. It's the same agenda with Bill Gates driving, you know, the institutional direction is the same. So how do you explain that?

Starting point is 01:33:41 here is july 29th rogers trump administration unfreezes 600 million dollars for gavie for global vaccine effort global vaccine effort i mean does that even i mean even in a slight way does that align with their agenda you ask for conservatives republicans anybody is trump leading a global vaccine effort it's just i just don't know why this it's just so ridiculous why don't they try not to be that obvious. I don't know. I think there's an agenda there somewhere. U.S. Secretary of State, Marco Rubio, has said in June that it was time to re-engage with the Geneva-based global alliance of Gabi. Right, because why? Did something change? No, it's the same thing that you guys all called the problem, and now re-engage, just like every other thing they do.

Starting point is 01:34:30 They give you six months and pretend like they never said it. The previous month, Gavi's chief executive, Sonja Nishtar, has said Gavi was moving away from vaccines that included a mercury-based, paste preservative. Like, we're still pretending. Like, think about how crazy that is. How obviously dangerous the aluminum mercury these things are. And there's still conversations about like, like, that's what we're still fighting for. That's like saying, make sure there's no arsenic in your cereal. And they go, well, we don't know for sure. It's just insane to me. We're so far, Pat, that should have been removed decades ago. It still matters, by the way. It should still happen. But what I'm highlighting is that what he did over there in that video

Starting point is 01:35:07 was not, as soon as they were, they talk about, that's what they're saying. They have said Gavi is moving away, not stopping moving away, which is a slow, gradual, probably 45-year process to move away from mercury-based preservatives. So it's not even stopping them, but he didn't say once they move away from mercury-based vaccines that will suddenly work with them again. He named vaccine issues. He named corruption, censorship, working with global agendas to, I mean, and now, and so this title, the Reuters article wants you to believe that that one move was what changed everything.

Starting point is 01:35:41 The U.S. State Department said a statement on Wednesday the decision to release funds was taken right after they committed to removing, the quote is this, right after Gavi committed to, quote, work towards transitioning mercury containing vaccines and expanding access to newer mercury-free alternatives. To work towards transitioning. So not even transitioning. We'll work towards beginning that transition at some point. Language matters, guys, and that's insane to me. Even though we know it wasn't really about that, that was one part of a larger conversation,

Starting point is 01:36:13 and the idea that we're still fighting to get mercury out of these things, it's just, it shows you how broken this is. And here we are. They're now giving up $6 million to the same group that we all know was a problem right again through the Trump administration. It's not, it shouldn't surprise you. Elon Musk, here he is on August 19th, underneath this post about the golden age of intelligence

Starting point is 01:36:34 and problem solving, cancer vaccines, coming. Yay, that's what we all want, isn't it? Cancer vaccines? Well, guess what? We just talked about one that it's very dangerous. That's something that actually one of our communities is dealing with and suffering from because it's actually very damaging. We've talked about it on this show. We'll come do it a second. Ketruda, what's called. Elon Musk says synthetic RNA will cure many diseases. Yeah, that's August 19th, guys, 2026. How many times have we played? I mean, in fact, I opened this on the, you know, the kind of recycling video that plays on, I think, Rumble and what's the other one?

Starting point is 01:37:08 Locals, I think. It just kind of plays a video before we start, like on a cycle. And I today use the one with Elon Musk. Checks all the boxes. Maybe I'll play on the way out. And one of them is MRI vaccines, 100%. And on top of that, as you know, we talked about this during COVID-19. Elon Musk partners with Gates-funded biotech company to produce MRNA micro factories.

Starting point is 01:37:29 It's called Kirovac. One of plenty he's involved with, by the way. And so it's just wanting to point out that today he's still pushing this very direction. And as much as he wants to talk about how, yes, it was misused, we all know that. The idea that we're still screaming in the direction of using this experimentally, they never even slowed it down, guys. They're still giving the COVID shot.

Starting point is 01:37:51 It's literally community. They're giving them Moderna money for new MRI shots. They just funded Pfizer for two new COVID shots on top of the ones they're already giving. They're working on multiple self-amplifying COVID-19 shots right now. and well as flu, as well as universal flu, M RNA, it's all openly in the pipeworks. And yet, people are still going, yay, Trump.

Starting point is 01:38:14 Yeah, know what they are. Either too stupid to see that they're not getting what they asked for or don't care. RNA will cure many diseases. By the way, it looks like she's claiming anyway that she posted a comment underneath that very post, which is then when he turned it to subscribers only. Exactly, guys, because people who are afraid of challenging,

Starting point is 01:38:33 having their ideas challenged are not real, they're not honest. Or they very much don't even believe in their own ideas, which is kind of, you know, or understand that they're hollow statements. She says, look at what happened after I replied to a couple of hours ago. Because they replied to his post with a screenshot of, you know, the cure back conversation.

Starting point is 01:38:51 They know what they're trying to hide, guys. They know whether people don't support them. Like in an honest sense, right? Like Mary Tally Bowden, by the way, who is champion of Maha until she realized it was, you know, a lie. At the very least, again, like the Magap. point that Trump and RFK Jr. were lying about believing in it. They're still part of a movement to make America healthy again. It's just not them being a part of it, as in Trump and Marfk Jr.

Starting point is 01:39:15 But she says, in response to that, synthetic RNA has created many diseases. Exactly. She says, I've never seen anything like it with any other product on the market. Look at that. What is going on with this platform? It's weird. Anyway, so created them. Now, isn't that a perfect market for the way that we know this industry works, keeping it going. Now, Sayer G, I believe, I forget the founder of GreenMed info, says Elon Musk, five hours after the data free pharma press release, MRA makes curing disease a software problem. A software problem. Isn't that exactly what MR and of Moderna was, exactly.

Starting point is 01:39:58 Moderna laid it out as the plug and play computer system in your body and then deleted all that because it was alarming to people and I still have it on the archive. In fact, the very video that outlines that has been deleted by YouTube. It's almost like they coordinated to hide that for everybody. It's crazy, right? But it says, Moderna stock, 174% of Merck 12%. Medina. 174, Paderna.

Starting point is 01:40:18 Did we just all forget that we were fighting this? I mean, or that Elon Musk is a champion of all these things? Who knows, guys? Who knows? Actually here. It just feels like the right moment. I'll just play the one-minute version, I think. The body will be safe.

Starting point is 01:40:42 if not everybody is vaccinated. Are you vaccinated? Yes, yeah, yeah. Yeah, I mean, I'm very pro-vaccination. We've, the science is unequivocal. Can you imagine that in 10 years when we are sitting here, we have an implant in our brains, and I can immediately feel, because you all will have implants?

Starting point is 01:41:04 Just think of sensors planted into our brains. Basically, implanted in your skull. So, but it would be flush with your skull. So you basically take out a chunk of skull, replace, put the neuralink device in there. You know, when he's doing this, it's so weird. Why is he like almost laughing about it? It's either because it's so crazy,

Starting point is 01:41:28 he knows it sounds crazy or because it's not even actually what he believes he's doing. But what I told you about this, guys, I'm of the mind that they know, that he knows the technology is way beyond that. you don't have to understand the idea of this and i'm not this it's not a crazy thing if you look into this you will clearly see that the level of technology is way beyond a physical implant in the sense of the way he's describing it now i'm not an expert i'm sure could be missing

Starting point is 01:41:54 something well i think it's interesting that he i remember looking at this going why is he laughing about that why is it make him look uh who knows but understand though that when we talk about the reality of the you know the like i'll even bring it up the new darpa optogenetics platform under trump it's what we're talking about. It is something that does not need or require some kind of constant connection or implant. It's about something that can be put into you via, I don't know, injection or aerosol, which is a real thing, and then used and activated from outside using, in this case, light pulsing or any different light sources. There's magnetogenetics that use magnetic sources.

Starting point is 01:42:29 There's radiogenetics. All those are very real and do not require, and I've talked about this for so long. You put the electrode, you'd insert the electrode threads very carefully into the brain. It doesn't change what you are doing. It changes you if you take a genetic editing. It's a fusion of the physical, so digital and so biological. Isn't it crazy that we're still, like this was during, this was 2020, 2020, 2021. We were seeing them sell you on what we're living through. It's the great reset.

Starting point is 01:43:02 Democrat side. We're watching the Great Reset Republican version. It's all the same thing. Your transhumanism, technocracy, like they're literally selling you on the future direction of what they're building. And pretend if you're so lost in the partisan lie, you think we're now in a different thing, a new vehicle in a different direction. And people fail to see how obviously it all just kept going. That's really the essence of the force in this revolution. A merger with biological intelligence and machine intelligence. An effort for man to merge with machine in a healthy way. Yes.

Starting point is 01:43:37 To beat machines, you basically have to merge with machines. Most likely, yes. As work is changing, is a universal basic income really a solution to this problem? I think ultimately we will have to have some kind of universal basic income. And I think some kind of a universal basic income is going to be necessary. Decarbonization of sea economy. Where are they traveling? How are they traveling?

Starting point is 01:44:00 What are they eating? What are they consuming on the platform? So individual carbon footprint tracker. Maybe these people believe that's what they're doing. Maybe that's what he believes he's fighting for, right? But what is that obviously overlap with that we're currently seeing, argued for from a different angle? Monitoring you, tracking your use and statements and your footprint. It's all the same.

Starting point is 01:44:29 It's just a different lens because Democrats were looking at that from that. Well, that was the power. Now Republicans are selling to the Republicans. Republican side. I just, it's wild to me how people can't see how fundamentally obvious all this is. And clearly, they're both fighting for the same thing. Maybe at some level, they don't even know that. Who knows? But you can, look, it's not even about what they, you can see where the path goes. They're talking about tracking you for saving the environment. They're talking about tracking you to fighting immigrants or whatever the current narrative is. Both things use the same technology. Both things amount to the same endpoint. That's what all this amounts to.

Starting point is 01:45:00 And Elon Musk has been pipe-fering you along the entire time if you've been falling for that. Stay tuned. We don't have it operational yet, but this is something that we're working on. I mean, my top recommendation, honestly, would be just to have a carbon tax. Cisclosure recent is necessary. Okay, back to the point. I'll include this, by the way. This was the video. Just Elon checks all the boxes. I always find that.

Starting point is 01:45:24 By the way, really quickly, I notice something all the time. I have these videos that I tend to reshare. I'll bring up in a quick example. The doctor's thread, which on a, by the way, on a separate side note, I'm not even able to make threads on this platform anymore. I used to be able to do this where you could add a three, like basically, you know, do videos and click on the last one, add thread. It won't let me do it anymore.

Starting point is 01:45:45 I just, I tried multiple times of the day. This platform is absolute ridiculous. So anyway, here's my point. I like and share these every single time. And every single time I come back, it's not liked. And all that means is being removed from my list of likes, which is something that should be constant, right? But on top of that, every time I repost it and share it, it never changes.

Starting point is 01:46:08 This has been stuck on this amount forever. I'll just include that in case you want to look at it. It's the one about Gaza Doctors. This guy's in a new documentary, by the way, just came out showing you all the same stuff we were talking about, killing children and all. But same thing here. Same thing here. Watch, I'll probably bring this up in the future and you'll see the same thing.

Starting point is 01:46:27 A small point. We all know these platforms are manipulating. Hopefully we all know that today. But it's just so grossly manipulated. They know what they're doing. and it's so obvious. Now, this is the point. Back to this, Sayers Post.

Starting point is 01:46:40 So he's saying synthetic RNA will cure many diseases. Modernus stock price soars. He says, what happened? Merck and Moderna's press release set a phase three trial of an experimental MRI vaccine. Ketruda met its primary endpoint versus Ketruda alone. I mean, these are set up to look like, just like the one RK Jr. and the rest just gave you.

Starting point is 01:47:04 the RNA flu shot literally caused myocarditis it literally they compared it to an old shot i mean they're just absolutely gaslighting you and they know it you can't think rfk junior is aware of that after he just yelled about placebo based gold standard science either he never intended to or he's not the one allowing that and trump's doing it over him and he's saying you better not say a word i who knows the truth is exactly what we talked about on this and and here is when we discussed this This exact conversation, yet again, demonstrating our value of how far ahead we were of this exact point. May 7, 2023, the new modified RNA. That's what this one is. It's mod RNA, just like the COVID shot, cancer jab. Now, we also recently pointed into it in a new show when we talked about John Fleetwood's

Starting point is 01:47:53 coverage of it, which is MRNA 24200. Or this was the one we were discussing, where he talks about the study as well. It's not moving for me, right? They receive injections alone or a combination with this marked as Ketrudeau. Just want to, you know, cite that back because this is a good, a good breakdown. Also, we have the Moderna information from the show that we covered. Not a joke, by the way. Literally, we covered this from Moderna on their website when this was happening and broke it down as,

Starting point is 01:48:28 what did I say? this jab, Ketruta, will destroy your immune system and how Maud RNA is created. And it's important to understand that. And what do you know? Sadly, by the way, somebody, Marshall, who's a longtime friend of us or in the chat, somebody's like literally, I think maybe, I forget whether Orwell or Huma first, but one of the very first people who ever ended up in my chat as a mod, or even just in the chat, by the way, he goes back way to the beginning of when I was doing this.

Starting point is 01:48:54 And sadly, he's struggling right now through cancer and everything else and, you know, main people who were recommending mainstream directions to him as family and so on have got on keytruda and it it i mean look at what orville is saying in the jap it literally destroyed it and it's just it's so so disgusting that we can see what these things are and so the point was it will destroy your moon system in 2023 breaking down what we saw based on their own science now of course one of them we have this is the kind of like the msd s sheet for it and right through it we go through it in depth in two different shows in fact that's one i'll include right there breaking down how it's just obviously dangerous,

Starting point is 01:49:31 then there is the Madonna page, which now doesn't exist anymore. Doesn't that make you feel good? That was one of the main things we went through showing you how dangerous this was. Now it's no longer there. Now, I'm sure they've got some other version of it somewhere, but it just shows you how manipulative this is.

Starting point is 01:49:44 Moderna, a platform that has never had a successful product to market without emergency authorization. And we're talking about things right now. They're arguably based on that because they've never truly removed the EUA underneath at all, not the main part of it, but as we talked about, there was two different sides to it, and that one of them became constant. We covered that a long time ago.

Starting point is 01:50:04 Most of them probably don't even know that. And he continues, set the irony aside for a moment. Merck and Moderna, pardon me, something is allergies, I guess. Merck and Moderna are the same two companies behind the COVID-era MRI shots, as well as obviously Pfizer and Johnson and so on. Many believe are fueling today's rise in cancer, even ignoring that the specific announcement has red flags worth examining one that the entire announcement no hazard ratio no confidence interval no p-value no safety nothing we met our end point

Starting point is 01:50:39 it just shows you what they're aiming for are people in power they make to say they don't even care that you think it's safe or not it's going to be put out there and people that follow directions will take them and he goes on to break down all the red flags there's everything missing from the release we went over most of this it's an interim analysis not a final one many points out the you know where was it read through it it's it's many the point is that this stuff if you read through it it shows you an obvious problem and it's just like the one from the the mrna flu shot which was that clearly based on the statistics they gave you like we were during during COVID when we showed you the UK stats and should prove to you in real time that

Starting point is 01:51:17 they were lying to you about what was beneficial or not it's the same thing what they're showing you in this information as I showed you this why I'm not going into depth now in this very conversation with less information that it was going to do exactly what we're now seeing, exactly what Sayers is pointing out. Sad. Now, also, we pointed, this is showing you that overlaps with left and right, if you're still in that game. This is from 2023.

Starting point is 01:51:45 Biden's America is facing a cancer drug crisis. Over 90% of U.S. cancer centers are reporting shortages. And I simply said, we'll get ready for the solution being this COVID shot, or this, excuse me, M-Mod RNA shot. Now, it didn't necessarily take the fruition, the action during Biden's administration, but they were the ones driving this direction. So if you want to see an obvious connection, realize that you saw it began under Biden, you saw it finished under Trump. It's like everything else we're highlighting. And on top of that, talking about the kind of part of the MRNA COVID timeframe discussion, I am seeing this come back up.

Starting point is 01:52:20 Not, I've seen people here and they're wearing them, but the conversation of it, I have seen bubble up a little bit more lately, which is the idea of masks. I just want to reiterate this. I shouldn't need to because I'd like to believe this is very clear, and we've seen people more skeptical than ever, just look into it. Ian Miller puts us out, says, absolutely incredible. This is one of the emails, you know, conversations that's going around. We don't need their exchanges to, other than proving that we know that they know,

Starting point is 01:52:47 but we already knew that. We already knew that they were aware of this because we watched them cover it up, right? But he says, incredible. All of the top COVID experts like Fauci and Rochelle Walenski knew that cloth mass didn't work. Well, guess what? None of them work in regards to statistically significant, stopping, being statistically significant in reducing transmission. That is the scientific way to say that. It does have some minor effect. The point is it does not actually make a, the only thing it matters, a statistically significant difference. Then you get into the fact that it actually has negative

Starting point is 01:53:16 effects on your health, bacterial ammonia and all the stuff we've gone over, especially since none of them are consistent. There's no, the mass are made by different companies that have no standard. There's different particles and fibers and some have metals. I mean, it's insane, guys. We've been over this so in-depth for years. But he says that knew that cloth mask didn't work and were already failing to stop or even slow transmission and they kept demanding more mass mandates and four schools and toddlers mask anyway. Okay, this is August 19. And he does say that by the way, we, you know, we talked about this at the time. Well, okay, good. I don't, I don't know the work. Then, anyway, probably. It's irrelevant, though. My point is saying,

Starting point is 01:53:55 in this now is not, I mean, all we're highlighting is, look, they said they knew. We knew that because they covered it up. We knew they didn't stop it because the science showed us that. And real world example showed us that. But it was, what was the other point? It was, oh, yeah, let me look for this really quickly. I forgot to look for specifically. Oh, that's actually funny.

Starting point is 01:54:20 This is one of the main studies that I was showing you, like literally in 2019, 2020 timeframe. 2015, a cluster randomized cloth. This is so crazy. You guys remember me harping on this for like of the first year? A literal randomized trial of cloth mask studies compared to medical masks. And it showed you, I mean, I can't even count how many times I went through this. Poor filtration may result increased risk infection.

Starting point is 01:54:46 We've screamed about this. Anyway, I'm glad I found this real quick because it'll be a good one for those that think were wrong. So I'll read it for yourself. It's peer reviewed. but I wanted to look for this actually. And I'm going to finish on this segment. We did a main point about kind of what they're highlighting here.

Starting point is 01:55:03 Because what was the thing we talked about, about specifically cloth masks. When this first started, one of the main things we said was that cloth masks are like the worst in the conversation and that they literally increased the risk. But then, and then they lied about it, right? But then what the, it almost exactly, literally within the same 24 hours, you had Lena Wynn and Gottlieb on Fox and CNN respectively, who came out and said, oh, guess what? Cloth masks don't work. We know that now.

Starting point is 01:55:30 Very coordinated. And I came out and said, that's pretty wild. Say, Sage advisor. Well, this is Sage advisor. Where was it? Anyway. Oh, that's a good one to include, too. Anyway, there's plenty, many different. I mean, so many of these things we've went over. PCR illusion, masks are back for everyone. So the point was in that one I just pulled up. Oh, I actually come back to that. The reality was that we know the cloth masks weren't working based on that one I just showed you in the sense of being not statistically significant in stopping transmission and more than anything, cloth mass increased the risk of infection and

Starting point is 01:56:08 tons of stuff is that we said that in 2020 and how important it was. And then went on to break that down and scream about it. Remember how long I was including the mass studies underneath every show I did even well past COVID? So people knew that. And then they came and just turned direction. Now, this is important to highlight even now, but realized that we didn't need them doing it to know with that, right? T-Lab was dying on this hill in the middle of 2020 because the science showing the risks of wearing masks and how they're not statistically significant, stopping transmission was extremely clear long before 2020. And of course, a mix of dogma and stupidity wins won the day. And I'll include some of them, which this one I actually thought was funny.

Starting point is 01:56:47 Who knows it back then people that even watched me. I don't know why I did that so small at the time, thought that I was somehow advocating for masks. And I'll even bet you guys that there is dishonest out there who used like a picture of this to show people and pretend that I believe in masks so that I changed my mind. And that never happened, not once. From the very beginning of this, I still know this the entire time and I still argue that. My point was I used a picture, both of the masks. And the title was, the mask science is clear. If you are doubting the science behind wearing a mask, watch this video. I did it for a reason to catch the people who thought, oh, good, this will prove that they work. You watch the video, you'll make it, it's obvious,

Starting point is 01:57:24 exactly what I'm saying. But that was July 2020. And we break it down. Simple. Exactly what they're saying today. We go over this in 2020. Well, this was a later one, but I grabbed it just now. Yeah, have ever reason to question everything you're told about variants, vaccines, mass, and PCR tests. This was kind of an overview. The great mask deception was a big one. That was 2020 as well. This one's 2021. Masks lead to bacterial pneumonia, oral thrush, systemic inflammation. And maybe the because of long haul COVID, which later became long COVID. I believe that's a huge part of it, as well as the vaccines, obviously, the injections. The face mask lie exposed, 2020, July. 2020, here's Trump and his mask because he always did that too. NBC caught faking COVID case. Immunity passports are here, and Trump now says he's all four masks, which he did say.

Starting point is 01:58:23 Just seems relevant to bring up again. Now, on to another overlap of the timeframe here. I think this is super important because I don't believe it's going to amount to what people wanted to be, which is David Marenz, Dr. Fauci's, you know, partner in crime, if you will. That's how it's being framed. Just like John Bolton, I believe this is being set up. So it's a pretend accountability. I don't believe Fauci, if not even this person, will go to jail.

Starting point is 01:58:52 Here's what Cash Patel said before we get into his other fake plot in regard to the, you know, ISIS thing. another one he just did. Remember the one before with the FBI shooting, how they tried to make it about some ISIS connection? Guys, that fell on its face. The one person who was let you killed himself is the only person, they did not ultimately get what they claimed about those people or any number of other lies cash screamed about in his first six months. Just crazy. After an FBI investigation, our DOJ partners, Dr. Fauci's associate, David Moran just pleaded guilty to conspiracy in the scheme to avoid FOIA requests. That's what it's about. And you know why you pled guilty? Just like with

Starting point is 01:59:28 Bolton, because I'm willing to bet you, my opinion, is that he's going to get a slap on the wrist. That was probably part of the agreement. My opinion. Kennedy says, thank you, Cash Patel. Think about how dumb that is. Is anybody confused about what a clown Cash Patel is, wildly incompetent he is? His own people say that. But they love how they do this, like fake high five and go, we're so smart and we work together.

Starting point is 01:59:49 Good job, Cash, you did all the good work. Probably not. He probably had nothing to do with any of that. But it says, for bringing a leading member of this dangerous cabal to justice. Oh, yeah, a leading. guys, they have gone out of their way to make sure Fouchi does not be. They could have put him in jail so long ago. The beginning of the administration.

Starting point is 02:00:07 But they waited. They waited until the statute of limitations ran out. They pardoned him. They gave him a commendation. It's so obvious there. Johnson's out there with, you know, Ron Johnson's on Benny Johnson's show talking about how we're going to use this and that to bring him down. I hope so. I just think we all can kind of sense that that's all a bunch of BS to keep you led along, leading you by the nose.

Starting point is 02:00:26 Accountability is not an option is not optional. seriously, you may decide from the 47 examples at random choice number, but just, you know, endless amount of people that they've pardoned, but they haven't chosen to go after. Ask Tom Bravovich, you got sent back to Israel after he tried to rape American children. But is his accountability optional? Apparently so. The American people have a right to know, he says, what their government did. You're damn right.

Starting point is 02:00:47 Then why do you keep lying to us about Epstein, about everything? He says, why it did it? And whether public officials deliberately hid it from the truth, what do you mean? Why it did it? You are the government, guys. you, why you did it. Why our government, like it's a weird, they frame it as if they're, some other side of it, they're fighting.

Starting point is 02:01:03 That's how they keep this going. We will restore transparency at HHS. They did not. Protect our integrity of public records. They did not. They've been hiding and covering and deleting things and build public trust through action. No one's above the law. Yeah, we, you know, pause for laughter.

Starting point is 02:01:21 So, to highlight this yet again, I did this the last time we talked about it, Fauci advisor, David Merenz, pleads, to avoiding records requests. Good, put him in jail. But that's really what we're going after? We just went through like a medical genocide. And these people hid and covered up and gaslit and then literally, like this sounds like they just hid the information.

Starting point is 02:01:40 They were part of the things they were hiding. And you're going to charge him with avoiding records request. Guys, this is insulting. The evidence we have is insane. It's like the Epstein thing. It's like Tyler Robinson in the reverse. It's obvious that we see that this is, if they wanted to, my God, guys, they could put this. The point is, if they put him in prison,

Starting point is 02:02:02 they charged him with the real crimes, it would cite back everything that they're involved in. Trump is completely complicit in all of this. As you know, he still takes praise for the shot, guys. August 18, David Marenz pleaded guilty charges related to concealing records, Freedom of Information Act, like our government does all the time. The initial indictment, which, by the way, was just an accusation, like we said, but this now amount. Now, I'm only to bet you had he not pled guilty, it probably still would have gone nowhere, like most of them. Not because they aren't able to, but because they choose not to. But I think this is to make a point.

Starting point is 02:02:37 My gut tells me this is about some kind of organized, frame, you know, facade of accountability. The initial indictment and plea documents do not name the two other individuals or the company, though one matches the description of Equal Health Alliance, alliance, eGolf alliances, then president Peter Dazzack. We all know that's interconnected. And my point, I bet you they never go after that. You know, somebody very much involved with the creation at a core point of all of this. But nope, probably won't even come up.

Starting point is 02:03:09 Because he's important to the establishment who's still doing those things in scientific and gain to function research, EPP, or whatever the new feign system gave, whatever the thing they're doing today. Morenza's offense could carry a sentence. of up to five years, sort of like Bolton State. It's literally exactly like Bolton's. It could be five years. Or it could be a slap on the wrist

Starting point is 02:03:31 in some community service, which is what I'm willing to bet you it will be. It says could be up to five years in prison and a fine of up to $250,000. He's scheduled to be sentenced on November 12th. Weird out Bolton's not going to be scheduled until like a year from now, or next year sometime.

Starting point is 02:03:46 Isn't that strange? So this one all of a sudden right away, this is set up so it feels like there's accountability. I'm telling you. by my opinion quote by pleading guilty today dr moran's has taken responsibility for what he did and will continue to do so so okay that that's for somebody representing it might i'm promising you this is the same thing the judge said about bolton because he took responsibility we'll factor that into our ruling and ultimately what you're going to get is somebody who took responsibility who did something

Starting point is 02:04:18 that they arguably feel i guarantee it is pretty damn minor and we're talking about i mean every one of them from Clinton to Trump and his family have all broken these rules. So that would hold accountable, good, but it's still a minor thing. And because he said, I did it, I'm sorry. Watch. I hope I'm wrong. I truly hope I'm wrong because he deserves to be in jail like the rest of them do. It's going to be a slap on the wrist. So they pretend somebody was held accountable and they'll scream out Fauci until you stop caring about it.

Starting point is 02:04:46 My unfortunate opinion. As Doom writes the same, this is your Nuremberg 2.0. that's what the claim, right? They're going to, military tribunals. This is all you get. Another low-level mook who got thrown under the bus by the person you want most to be punished. And I told you this would happen. But no, I'm the stupid person.

Starting point is 02:05:04 I'll fill that in. Who remembers how the first trials went. Now, look, I still argue that Fauci is an easy scapegoat, but it would go the same way. Not a real accountability, but some kind of a, you know, you get to stand over there in a corner for five minutes. And then, you know, you're upset. As even Tucker told you. He, you know, look, you know, his life's been really. ruined and trust me, it's going to come. No, screw that. They deserve to be in prison for killing people.

Starting point is 02:05:26 Making them sad as they take their garbage out is not enough for me. And it shouldn't be for you either, Tucker, even though I'm speaking off a clip, so who knows what he said in the full thing. And that's just to be fair. Now, talking about the deception, the falsehood, the artificial nature of damn near everything, this has just got to be one of the most ridiculous things I've ever seen. Now, that doesn't mean that it's fake. I mean, this lady could literally believe what she's saying, just it speaks for itself. Everything we know about the FBI, it's basically Cash Patel doing it in a very stupid sophomoric dumbed down way since the beginning of this start, it's the beginning of this administration. This is not a fake picture. This is literally the woman who signed herself to ISIS

Starting point is 02:06:09 going out in her ISIS burq and shopping for the things that they gave her money for, drove her to the store for to go blow something up. And in a store with cameras, and like biometrics on the screen. I mean, are you serious? So it's either somebody that's just so, I mean, the intelligence level is something that they always take advantage of. But let's go through this briefly. Here's Todd Blanche going,

Starting point is 02:06:33 we're so great. Thanks to the FBI for its amazing work. According to the complaint, the defendant swore allegiance to ISIS, which, who knows that's even true, guys? Maybe that, you know, maybe they said wear this so you can cover your face. Who knows?

Starting point is 02:06:44 Look, I'm going to be very clear. I'm saying that because I'm almost being facetious, but you need to understand historically, as we'll go through some examples, examples, this is, that's, that's a, almost a likely thing for the FBI to do. The fact that they feel that they can lie and trick and manipulate you into committing a terrorist attack and then say because you followed, half the time they don't even follow through, but because you just went along to some point that you're now charged with a crime, it's just, it's straight up crime on their own

Starting point is 02:07:12 part, guys. You have to understand, whether it's pre-crime or not. Examples of a guy, we talked about the past who they were kind of driving to take these little toy cars and drive them through a parade. At the end of the point, the guy said, no, I'm not going to do it. And they rest in right there and charge him with a crime anyway. Okay, well, what if he was just gaslighting you guys and wanted you to think he wanted to do it because he wanted some friends, like you do with people, for example, like this kid. I literally mentally handicapped person. This is from Matt Agarist, Free Thought Project 2018.

Starting point is 02:07:44 Right parents catch FBI in plot to force mentally ill son to be a right-wing terrorist. it's not some hyperbolic story. You can read it. It's mainstream media, guys. The parents caught them in the, and literally like lost their minds. Like, this kid, basically the story shortened is that this kid wanted friends. He didn't have any friends.

Starting point is 02:08:00 And they basically pretended to be people around his community and, like, hey, he wants to be friends. And then slowly worked him in to wanting to be part of some kind of plot. And by all the evidence, he never actually even wanted to do it. He just said he did so he could have friends. And ultimately, they used that to pretend he was a terrorist. Now, whether it's about right wing or not, it's what both sides of the paradigm do, guys.

Starting point is 02:08:19 And the reality is they do this all the time. And here is the intercept. Why does the FBI have to manufacture its own plots if terrorism and ISIS are such grave threats? I think it's very important to consider all this, guys, very important. I frankly think that crisis initiation is really tough. And it's very hard for me to see how the United States president can get us to war with Iran. which leads me to conclude that if, in fact, compromise is not coming, that the traditional way of America gets to war is what would be best for U.S. interests. Some people might think that Mr. Roosevelt wanted to get us into World War II, as David mentioned.

Starting point is 02:09:03 You may recall we had to wait for Pearl Harbor. Some people might think Mr. Wilson wanted to get us into World War I. You may recall he had to wait for the Lusitania episode. Some people might think that Mr. Johnson wanted to send troops to Vietnam. You may recall we had to wait for the Gulf of Tonkin episode. Just had to do something very quickly. Somewhat relevant. All right.

Starting point is 02:09:23 So back to the point, saying that this person had swore leading into ISIS. The question is whether that was even the reality or something that was just manufactured along with all the rest of the stuff they manufactured and plan to carry out a future deadly attack with explosives in New York Capitol building while senators were meeting. Thankfully, this scheme was disrupted, potentially saving many lives. This is just the latest example of federal law enforcing enforcement. stopping a terrorist attack at its tracks. And just what a ridiculous way to frame this.

Starting point is 02:09:55 Now, look, it's possible that there's a, you know, bad people exist that do terrible things. But ask yourself this, when's the last time you have seen something like this that didn't end up being, oh, well, they did it all to get them there? Really ask yourself that. Now, if it was such a prevalent threat, wouldn't they be popping off all over the place? They would stopping them everywhere? Wouldn't they be, and I'm not to say there's not some kind of a risk, guys.

Starting point is 02:10:16 That's why the, if in a stated society we have the system we do, the idea of the law. You know, people break the law. They can be held accountable for it. But what they're trying to get us to is a place to where we go, you need to stop it before it happens. That is this whole premise they've been building. Medical pre-crime and pre-crime in general,

Starting point is 02:10:32 starting with Bill Barr and Trump's first administration, as Whitney is covered. That's what this comes down to. So we need to ask ourselves whether some of this stuff is designed to justify that direction. Even if it's people that are actually crazy. It doesn't change the fact that they're not committing a crime until they commit a crime. it's as simple as that guys and if you think they're crazy well then you know the idea is not forced them into a terrorist attack it's just it's it's absolutely mind-blowing that people go along

Starting point is 02:10:57 with this and then you get ridiculous people like blanche they go oh it's so great and we stopped all the criminals and don't mention anywhere that you literally funded the entire thing as thomas massy said the FBI gave her to bomb the gun the funds to spend at a home depot i'll show it to you next the government literally encouraged and enabled this terrorist plot and then in order to foil it And one day, they'll have to admit this how the J6, J5, pipe bomb happened as well.

Starting point is 02:11:23 And he's right. They literally framed somebody else and he pointed out to the gate tracking and the person they think, it's the same thing. And you think they're fighting for you? You know, it's like this is not a left, right dynamic. This is about a government

Starting point is 02:11:36 gaslighting Americans to control us. So here, oh, and by the way, this is what I think is hilarious, not alarming too. What stood out to me when I first saw this was the fact that Todd Blanche's post had a fact check on it, which now it does not. So think about how wild that is.

Starting point is 02:11:55 And this is Twitter clearly with an agenda. Elon and Twitter clearly with an agenda to support the team completely just jump in and delete these things. And this is what it said. And it wasn't just still gathering. This was posted. And it said the criminal complaint states that FBI paid confidential human sources to do it.

Starting point is 02:12:14 And provided $200 and pre-recorded government funds for the, the purchases shown in the attached images, literally gave her the money, the ride, and the direction to do all of it. And guess what? The free speech platform removed what is the truth. Look for yourself. That's what's happening. So here is BBC and literally every other platform, because this is verifiably obvious. FBI arrest woman over alleged plot to bomb New York Capitol building. The FBI arrested the New York woman who was allegedly planning to bomb the state capital because guess what? It hadn't happened, so we don't know for sure, in Albany to kill lawmakers. Prosecutors allege that Jessica Bowie, 35 years old, had previously pledged allegiance to

Starting point is 02:12:52 ISIS. So what's interesting is that's not what she's saying best I can tell. We'll get more as this develops what she says in court and so on, if that's even where this ends up. But realize that all we have right now, sort of like with, oh, you know, Tyler admitted this with his, you know, roommate. And, you know, is that what happened? We're still basing this off things that you reprinted because you claim you threw the note away. Right. So here we are where you're telling us that she claimed allegiance to ISIS and using that to justify why this is all making sense. And it says she's charged by providing material support or resources to a designated forest terrorist terrorist organization.

Starting point is 02:13:26 Now, this is still, this is a harder sell for some people. But realize the core point in this, and this comes down to the principle of it all, what crime is it by supporting anything? Right. I mean, it's right now, by the way, even Miller was just making a statement about registering people that are Democrats. Like, you need to see how alarming this is. So you could say, you know, ISIS are terrorists.

Starting point is 02:13:46 They're danger or crazy. Okay, maybe you're probably right. But isn't that still just the perception of a group that you support? So what if they start saying, I don't know, Democrats are crazy terrorist monsters. And we have to make sure that if you even support Democrats, well, now you're going to jail because you're a terrorist. Well, in a material sense, like a real sense, not remove the names. What's the difference? Framing.

Starting point is 02:14:07 That's all it is. And it gets even more crazy when you step back and realize that ISIS itself is a group that's been funded and organized armed, supported, and flown around the world by the very people that pretend to fight it. The U.S., Israel, and the rest. But if you still have not gotten there, guys, it is easily identifiable. As always, I will include James Corbett's Al-Qaeda documentaries. Because it's, I mean, probably if you watch this truly, you will not walk away from that. And like you choose to, pretending like this is not the truth.

Starting point is 02:14:37 It's nailed to the wall, guys. And it's the obvious reality. And it's been there your whole life. So the point would be that charging her with material support for the group would mean that you have to prove that she actually did something for them, sent them something, as opposed to just dressing in a burqa and using government money to buy things at Home Depot

Starting point is 02:14:58 that was maybe going to be used for that purpose. And even then, would that be a support of the group? Are you part of the group? Or are you just ideologically in that direction? Like this is a dangerous, you know, they create this un-this, like a kind of nebue, like undefined air of just like, well, if you are anywhere in the category, right, you got a black t-shirt on.

Starting point is 02:15:18 Suddenly it's like, well, you're in that. I mean, that's a stretch, right? But my point is that's the kind of thing they do. Now you wear a burqa. Suddenly you're a terrorist. Wait a minute. That's not the reality, right? That's what they've been doing for so long.

Starting point is 02:15:29 By the way, I just saw some absurd video from Alex Jones hyping the idea of women getting raped by going to the Middle East as he's talking about India because he's that ridiculous. And on top of that, making fun, like laughing about how they're basically being raped. if that's even the real story. Some one video he shares, this is these, like they're, you know, anti-Trump,

Starting point is 02:15:47 but they're still avidly fighting for the left-right paradigm. Democrats are the worst children, in my opinion. Bowie had repeatedly surveilled the building in advance, they say, and was carrying a fake bomb and a defective gun, which had been supplied to her by the agents. Okay, well, then because it wasn't a real gun or a bomb, then what's the crime here? Oh, she thought they were.

Starting point is 02:16:09 How in the hell do you prove that? So now what if she knew they were fake and was laughing at you guys? Now suddenly because you lied to her that now she's on the hook for a crime that wasn't even there because they weren't real in the first place, this deserves to be laughed about. If it wasn't so serious, that is, but it deserves to be ridiculed, rather. And people should be calling this out. I'm willing to bet you her lawyer will have a field day if this is even actually allowed to get there. Which probably won't, guys.

Starting point is 02:16:35 That's the whole point. These things rarely get to that case because they make a deal because they know what will come out. spent weeks with agents posing as ISIS members. So now that's why it's material support because they were, she was supporting ISIS. No, she was supporting feds dressed as ISIS. Like they dress as everything else, by the way, currently as Nazis or whatever else. Not the Democrats, but your government, ladies and gentlemen, right now too. Quote, I want to have it in, have an effect on the American system, she said.

Starting point is 02:17:03 Okay, well, now you start to see where this is being framed. Now you've got people who are politically active who want some different direction. did talk about anarchy. Well, now you're a terrorist. That's literally why I started that way today, guys, because the truth is what they're trying to create is this fake alignment of people that want to change this country in ways that they don't want as somehow radically dangerous. What they're doing is radically dangerous.

Starting point is 02:17:26 The world they're creating is radically dangerous. The things they're putting us in today are radically dangerous. The idea of trying to radically change this back to what it could have been, if not something better, is just being aware of where we are. And on top of that, even if you disagree, let's go back to the same point from the start. The square one point I made today, do we not have a right to think and believe in what we want? Isn't it when you do crimes when you're actually breaking the law? Well, no, they've really clearly nudged this into ideological crime as they scream about other countries to do that.

Starting point is 02:18:01 As part of her plot, she planned to use food delivery bags to hide her bomb. And if you back, one more point on that. You know, because what you could highlight is that whether it's ICEs or not, you didn't do anything, right? That's the same point before. But what I'm saying is, you know, what if you just arguing like, I believe in anarchy, which I do is a genuine possible future step? Not that I'm going, burn it all down because chaos. That's just the dumbest representation. And it's not what that means.

Starting point is 02:18:25 But so now my point is that you're saying, me believing that makes me a terrorist. When we're in a country that pretends we have ideological freedom, that's like saying believing in document. democracy, socialism, or fascism are a crime. And also where they're really getting close to, isn't it? Because they find both sides who hate both. Democrats hate fascism, Republicans, hate socialism. So socialism, so you're going to create a world which both of them call for what? Censorship of ideas.

Starting point is 02:18:52 Shutting down of ideological freedom. Too late, we've been there for a long time, guys. Agents allegedly also gave Bowie $200 to buy bomb-making material from a local hardware store. They drove her to the Home Depot store. And when she emerged from the store, in her burqa, stupidly enough, she allegedly said she hoped these were the right kind of nails. She was arrested on Wednesday and was found carrying knives and a written oath of allegiance to ISIS.

Starting point is 02:19:19 Now, does that not just sound like the stupidest thing in and of itself? Why would you be carrying around a written allegiance to ISIS? And pretty sure knives aren't crimes. And pretty sure written statements on paper, whatever they say, are not crimes as well. It's absurd what this is. thing that ties us all together, even if it is about ISIS, is the fact that the FBI stepped in and drove her to do it. Would she have done it otherwise? That is the question of the day. And that's why it matters, because whether you know the answer or not, the crime starts when

Starting point is 02:19:48 she breaks the law, not when they suggest that she might because they drove her to do it. She is a frequent social media user. Same point. That they're trying to, this is the thing that's going to be used against people like me. Frequent social media user who has used the platforms to espouse anti-American messages also while we started with that tweet. According to a charging document, that's literally the charging document by the FBI they put forward on Thursday. Frequent social media user espousing anti-American messages. What was the other part?

Starting point is 02:20:19 Anyway, just, you know, the simple idea is that you're framing this, that overlaps with, not honestly, but with anybody that's doing what we do on either side of the paradigm, that they want to call a threat to what they claim is American interest, which really means government Israeli interests. And I mean that in the U.S. government too, but the government, you know, not American, civilian average agenda or interests. And that's pretty clear, guys. I mean, conservatives are going through that right now.

Starting point is 02:20:46 The document says she has been banned from several platforms. Interesting overlap for violating the terms of service. They're creating a profile here, guys. Adding that she had also used social media to praise the September 11th attacks. Okay. there's your difference. If that's even the truth, there's a bit difference here.

Starting point is 02:21:06 Because somebody like me, and literally me, whether it's not just the same as any anarchist out there because of different opinions, individuals. I believe that it matters to me whether I agree with the agenda or not. Like the idea of what happened in Gaza, the idea that killing people for your political agenda,

Starting point is 02:21:23 I do not agree with. And I argue that that is something that is counterintuitive to the idea of what the core movement around this is today, especially libertarianism. Anarchism just becomes more difficult to define because that's the whole point of it. But the idea is that if you're going to say libertarians don't care that you're murdering people for your agenda, that's literally the opposite. You're using political violence to achieve your ends is what we're all talking.

Starting point is 02:21:43 All of us are calling out. So what you're highlighting is the fact that she's praising September 11th and trying to conflate that with media user, violation of terms of service, hates America. And that's, it's just, it's a manipulated connection. because I'm sure there are Americans that praise that. And you know what, guys, it's the right to do. They can praise anything they want. They can say, oh, guess what? People that currently praise the Israeli genocide.

Starting point is 02:22:08 Same thing. People that go look back and say the Bosnia genocide was good for us all. I go, you're disgusting. But they have a right to say it, don't they? Why would that be a crime? Because you connect the dots and argue it's a profile. And here we go. And even if you're right, it's the same point.

Starting point is 02:22:23 And we need to stand on this line. There's no crime until she breaks the law. And look, what they're going to say is, oh, you would have let her blow things up? That's not what I said. There's no evidence that was going to happen without your involvement. And guess what? You guys do it all the time all around the world, not saying that makes it okay, but it's hypocritical for you to say that. And secondarily, people do these things around the world in this country, whether or not they're dressed as ISIS.

Starting point is 02:22:47 It's danger is always there. Do your best to stop it with our rights being the primary guide. And yes, that allows some danger. That's life, guys. rights are the final point. If it bumps up against that, your answer is don't even... Like the same thing with the Donald Trump immigration point.

Starting point is 02:23:05 They literally convinced people that were screaming about the Constitution that it's important to break the Constitution to save the Constitution. Now, maybe that's just a lack of intelligence or people that believed in enough in Trump, but the point was they tricked you, guys. Please make sure you watch this.

Starting point is 02:23:22 False flags, the secret history of al-Qaeda. Oh, and then, interestingly enough, I meant to do this while this was up. So here is the picture of this person in a burqa, right? just for, you know, clear, I guess more perspective, this weird picture of her and Burka. And then went outside as taking a picture of them, I guess, or however that worked, taking photos during the trip. It's the Capitol building. They're literally looking right at them.

Starting point is 02:23:53 Like, I don't even believe that makes sense. Anyway, the point is that this, if you remember, is Tommy Robinson, who posted this pretending it was about Muslims. I don't want to hello this for a reason. Tommy, who was just ridiculous, post of this, saying, this has no place in the 21st century. And it shows a woman with Burka, with their children, and Burkhas as well. Right?

Starting point is 02:24:18 So what he's saying is Muslims who do this have no place in today, right? Only problem was it was a Jewish family, as we've covered many times. And it's amazing how people still just like don't want to absorb this. And it's the same as pretending that it's wrong for people to, like in Iran and the idea of the hijab. and the idea are specifically, anyway, many different points you could make. And the point being that there's elements of that that are forced and it's largely not really enforced in many places in the country

Starting point is 02:24:45 and women can dress largely on many ways like Americans do. It's easy to prove, by the way. But there is some enforcement on it. And many of them wear it simply because they see it as a challenge to Western enforcement, you know, encroachment on their lives. But then you take a glance over and look at the Orthodox Jews in Israel, how they force women to wear head coverings. And it's just, we just not talked about.

Starting point is 02:25:04 It's just a mip, and it's a deliberate manipulation and misrepresentation. So in this case, as this Jewish family from here's the article itself from the Jewish platform, Jewish independence nonprofit, called Forward. Oh my God. Guys, this is so crazy. This is not an accident. Oh, no, I can't get it to refresh. There we go. Look at this.

Starting point is 02:25:29 They remove the image. This is so crazy. Here's the original head right here. That's the original post. And it says, introducing the Frumqua, Jewish women under the Burka. Because at the same point,

Starting point is 02:25:42 they cover their heads in, you know, whatever it is, homage to God, or, you know, whatever the term is, and the same point applies in extreme orthodoxy to people in Judaism.

Starting point is 02:25:51 And I think it's insane that this platform removed the image because of what it shows. Because it's from 2015. This is happening all over the internet. Guys, it's so easy to see that there are people

Starting point is 02:26:02 trying to cover in high directions and it all connects to the same larger point, in my opinion. But what did I said? Oh, and here's the actual article, which, I mean, read that too as you can see it. No, this isn't a dementer or a modern art installation. This isn't even, as you more likely expect, a Muslim woman wearing a burqa. Nope. It says, jump to kind of the chase.

Starting point is 02:26:24 Where is it right here? A Jewish woman and her two daughters. A dark black cloth covering them head to toe. Well, there you go. Ask yourself why they remove the image, guys. I still find that insane. So Tommy Robinson is the one sharing this saying, pretending or being stupid enough not to realize that it wasn't Muslims.

Starting point is 02:26:42 But it's okay. He's allowed to say that because if he came out here and said, these Jewish people have no place 21st century, he would have been banned the moment he posted it. Not this one, though. Well, I said, well, you still call this out as having no place in the 21st century once you realize it's actually a picture of a Jewish woman in Israel? Probably not.

Starting point is 02:26:59 So now think about that. Why is it important that she's in a burqa if that's not unique to ISIS. Even in reality being is that burqas are warmer people all over the world that aren't ISIS. It's just sad how blatantly obvious these kind of agendas are. You took advantage of a person who doesn't understand. You took advantage of somebody who is either mentally unwell or being propagandized by the wrong thing. You used this person.

Starting point is 02:27:23 And then it didn't even happen and you still try to charge her. This is so common. It makes me sick. As I said, parents catch FBI in a plot to force their mentally ill son to be a tick. terrorist. I mean, Intercept has been like four articles about this over the years. This is Glenn from 2015. Why does the FBI have to manufacture its own plots if it's such a great threat? It's a good question. It's good article. Read it. Now, talking about the censorship, which clearly plays a factor on this exact point, is that people like us who are talking about this, and more specifically

Starting point is 02:27:55 in the context of the war, people that are talking about military things, that the supposed free speech absolutists in our government want censored. And this is Occupy Democrats even, saying Pete Heggseth forces the editor of military newspaper, stars and stripes to resign and replaces him with a loyal minion for breaking the story of sailors throwing themselves off the USS Abraham Lincoln. Now, I haven't talked about this in a minute. When I first talked about this like a couple of week ago or more, I hadn't been able to confirm whether that actually happened.

Starting point is 02:28:27 I'm going to point this out to you today. It very much did happen. and that they're trying to pretend like they lied about it, even though it was real, which means they don't care about these people. And now that it's been proven, they call it a mental health issue and the guy was problematic.

Starting point is 02:28:39 Okay, it's still the same point. I have the father telling you that they aren't worried about them on the ship. As I understand it, I guess they're not bringing it back, even though he just told you that needs to go longer, as his usual bluster, the Trump can't just admit it was wrong.

Starting point is 02:28:51 He goes, screw you, I'm right, it's going to go longer and then it takes back. Has to have that moment of I'm strong, which shows you that he's weak. It's what it always shows you when somebody pounds their chest and ultimately caves. The publisher of Stars and Stripes is walking away after more than 30 years.

Starting point is 02:29:06 As at the story of military newspaper at Pete Higgs-S Pentagon, moves to exert more control over a publication, generations of American service members have trusted for independent news. Now, take or leave that part if you want. Max led, it has done great work over the years, but I just, same thing, I've seen things on there that I don't believe. I think you're, you know, at certain moments, it leads in the direction. It's pro-status, pro-military.

Starting point is 02:29:27 Max Lederner, who has served as publisher for nearly two decades, announced his retirement after the Pentagon installed an active duty Navy public affairs officer as his deputy without even consulting him. He made clear this was no ordinary retirement. He says, quote, it has become clear that my philosophy of leadership and my understanding of the value and mission of stars and stripes differ in fundamental ways from the direction and the leadership of the Department of Defense has for the organization. that direction has been increasingly obvious since Hegset took over the Pentagon. His defense department has derided Stars and Stripes as woke, announced plans to overhaul the publication, and fired its independent Ombudsman, who is now suing the Pentagon and alleges she was retaliated against for criticizing its attempts to control the paper's editorial content, which I argue this proves, by the way. You'll see as we go through it. Now active duty captain

Starting point is 02:30:26 William Urban has been placed directly in the newspaper's senior leadership, which members of the Stars and Stripes Advisory Board says threatens the separation that has allowed the government-funded newspaper to report independently. But we know that's never been the full picture because they pressure, they lean. But what they're saying is they literally, it used to be a paper that was, you know, people that were veterans, you know, but not funded by the government, but not bound by what they want. Well, now they moved him out of the way and put an active duty person at the head, who's now literally under the control of the executive branch.

Starting point is 02:30:58 I mean, it's just so hard, it's insultingly obvious. And they want to pretend they believe in free speech and, you know, everything they care, they scream about, guys, that's just insulting. And they'll scream about Iran and North Korea and whoever else doing the exact same thing. How does someone with zero experience in a global news organization walk into a senior level role at Stars and Stripes? Asked the board, we should all worry about the future of this platform. Three Democratic senators are worried enough that they've demanded Hakeseth explain his role.

Starting point is 02:31:29 Now, as usual, I argue they probably wouldn't care if it was something that benefited them or they were the ones in power. It's about using it to look like their adversarial and calling out the power. My opinion, Sam, Jaded, I probably am, but look historically, I'm right, and I bet you that's how it pans out. It says, and here's why this matters right now. Stars and Stripes has continued doing exactly the kind of journalism, and an independent military newspaper is supposed to do.

Starting point is 02:31:52 The exact opposite, and you damn will know it than what Trump and Hanks us want. They want somebody who's going to recite that we're winning and everything's great. And Trump is so strong. And his hair looks great that day. Literally, I'm joking, but kind of not. Like, they're like, do whatever we say, make us look great. And it's, guys, it's like kindergarten level obvious. The way that they attack papers who literally break stories like the Lincoln story that

Starting point is 02:32:16 turn out to be right. everybody sees that it has reported critically on the mental health crisis and risk of self-harm of people on the lincoln excuse me even as haggseth attacked people reporting on it and said they were fake news well he's lied we know that we can prove it it's real i mean like i'm like you didn't know that on this platform but realize all the things they're lying about today and willing to lie while they know they're i mean these are the people they say that the military that they claim they're fighting for and they didn't even care that they were suffering and lied about it. I mean, what you could have said is, well, yeah, it's tough. They're suffering, but we're at war.

Starting point is 02:32:57 You know how many Republicans would have died on that hill, but they're bad at this. And so they go, fake news, Democrats, whoa, you're a liar. And they've failed because that's how weak that is. Hegg Seth has shown little interest in leading the Pentagon through the institutional restraints, professional expertise, and hard-won consensus. That traditionally govern and organize, organization of nearly three million people. He wants to impose his will on it and an independent newspaper capable of telling those people things their bosses don't want them to hear plainly doesn't fit that model. So just quickly, here's the AP report on it. After this, so that was on the 20th, this is on the 21st. So the day later, it gets even worse. Stars and Stripes editor says

Starting point is 02:33:37 he has been fired for insubordination after doing an interview. Now it says the Pentagon on Friday fire the editor-in-chief Stars and Stripes as well as its publisher and a reporter. So that's in addition to him from the, you know, apparently they're clearing house of anybody that won't do what they're told. You know, hashtag journalism. And it says as well as their publisher and a reporter, the editor said, he said he was dismissed for insubordination. After an interview he gave that objected, get this, to censorship by the military. So he goes on an interview and says, well, we can't allow them to censor us for the military because, you know, journalism. And they fire you for insubordination.

Starting point is 02:34:17 Is anybody confused? I mean, there's no way you look around this. Eric Slavin, editor-in chief of the military newspaper that is partly funded by the Pentagon, but has a long legacy of editorial independence, you know, so we're told, told the Associated Press that he and the others had received notices of separation. Slavin said he was being fired for, quote, stating in a CBS interview, that hypothetical censorship, not even real, but just saying in the future, hypothetically, should that happen, hypothetical censorship for news of news for service members would constitute a red line for him.

Starting point is 02:34:52 Right? So they said, oh, we'll get him out of here then. So a red line for him is allowing them to censor. So get him out of the way. It's very, very clear that stars and stripes must remain editorial independent. And they said, no way. We can't allow independence and sent free speech. That's crazy.

Starting point is 02:35:10 Hashtag free speech, Elon Musk. Now, Lederner made his announcement. a few weeks after the Pentagon installed a new deputy publisher. An active duty service member, which is important. So they put him in underneath him and then coordinated getting him out of the way and then bumped this guy up. And that's the only reason I did that. Guy had no experience there.

Starting point is 02:35:30 He's an active duty person. He was put underneath him. So when he got kicked out of the way, he bumped up to the position. That's what I think anyway. Heg says Pentagon moves to exert an editorial control and eliminate what it asserts our woke distractions. In April, Pentagon fired. Jacqueline Smith,

Starting point is 02:35:46 I'm Budsman for the newspaper, whose job had been to safeguard editorial independence. So it's clear the timeline as they were getting ahead of this. Get rid of the woman who's literally her job as a safeguard, but we're attacking, and then force them to do it if they don't, we'll get rid of new people. That is the state of where we are,

Starting point is 02:36:02 where we've been for a long time, but where it's just, I guess, either obvious to a certain degree or worse than ever. So the cradle highlighted this video. What I find really weird, by the way, apparently this was posted on Instagram. That's what everyone argues.

Starting point is 02:36:19 This guy, Andrew Brown, as far as I can tell, was the very first person to talk about this thing, which I think is super important, guys, that instead of even just like the cradle link or whatever else, like finding the original, where was the first person who made this argument?

Starting point is 02:36:34 Do you shouldn't they, don't they deserve credit? And I believe that's Andrew Brown. But what I find so strange is that I literally am unable to find the original post on his Instagram account or wherever it was. I look for a while, too.

Starting point is 02:36:46 Nonetheless, the cradle, good for them for posting it and giving him some reach. Put this out here. He says six people have tried to jump off the U.S. is Lincoln. Now, when this first came out, that was the point. Hegg Seth called it fake news, that you're a bunch of woke Democrats. Well, he's right. Proven to be right.

Starting point is 02:37:04 Next, I'll play a clip of a father talking about his son on the ship, dealing with all the same stuff. You know, the pictures of food. Like, these guys just lied through their teeth at you. Same with the reflecting pool. Same with everything about Iran. You know, save with everything. As there is a mental health crisis happening aboard the USS Lincoln in the Middle East that no one is talking about.

Starting point is 02:37:27 And mainly because the Navy is pretty much quashing it. You will read online about food shortages, supply shortages, poor morale among crew members. That's because they've been at sea continuously for 250 days. They've been deployed a total of 271 days. 250 without a port of call. That's unheard of. Normally they would go to port every three to six weeks. They have not been to port.

Starting point is 02:37:55 And their families are largely worse. Like that's, for them, they're alarmed, right? Like, this has been months. They haven't seen them when they usually see them pretty, you know, intermittently. That's one of the reasons this started to come out because the families were speaking out, and it's not hard to hide. 38 weeks. Keep in mind, there are 52 weeks in a year.

Starting point is 02:38:11 And 50 without a port of call. That's unheard of. Normally they would go to port. every three to six weeks. They have not been to port in 38 weeks. Keep in mind there are 52 weeks in a year. And yes, the showers are moldy. They're eating basically like a gruel kind of slop at this point. There's no deodorant. There is no toothpaste. My nephew has a friend on board there, and I was basically hearing updates last week when I was in the stage in real time. They're not talking about the mental health crisis. Six people have tried to jump off that ship. The most

Starting point is 02:38:42 recent was last Monday. You know, when you have not touched land in 38 weeks in over 200 days, things start to happen to you mentally. You know, combine that with exhaustion and deadly mistakes start to happen. So, you know, this is how the Department of War, this is how Donald Trump treats our service men and women, whose lives are already being put in harm's way for a bullshit war of aggression that was supposed to be over in a matter of weeks. We are further putting their lives at risk out of sheer ineptitude and neglect. It defies logic. It defies reason. And it defies basic fucking humanity. Sorry for the curse. I forgot that was at the end. But I agree with them. Right. I mean, it's absolutely crazy to me that this is something that it just speaks, it speaks for

Starting point is 02:39:34 itself. What they're doing in all this showing you that they don't care about any of these people, if they're willing to abuse them. Like the same point you just made a second ago, it wouldn't have been difficult for you to sell this as something that was just, I mean, it would have been unpopular to say that it's just what it is what it is. We're in the middle of the war. Like it's important for the cause. Like this is something that will get a lot of status. Like, okay, we get it. And they have done some degree of that. But they just lie because they're weak. Heggsath is so clearly out of his depth. He just lies because he's doing what he's been told about everything. Anything goes wrong. Blame the Democrats. That's what they did. And so good on Andrew Brown for calling

Starting point is 02:40:10 this out way before people were talking about it. He got shouted down by the fake, you know, the actual fake news, all of our government. And here is a father talking about how this is happening. And it's talking, I forget what, a mainstream, I think CNN, and simply asked about people jumping off and so on.

Starting point is 02:40:27 And in case you haven't seen, this isn't real, that was very real. Like, in regard to specific examples of people that put a life best on, jumped off, and they called it like a mental health thing. But apparently it's far more than that. And far more people are struggling. And it's not just about the fact that they're being kept out, but it shows you they're trying to hide the reality of what's going on, guys, at the expense of the people that they claim they're fighting for. I want them to come home. And all of us as parents have some questions about

Starting point is 02:40:58 the length of time that it's taken and the distribution of military assets. I'm wondering, you know, a U.S. official tells me that last month, the sailor on the USS Abraham Lincoln went overboard. Actually, it was earlier this month. And that sailor was wearing a life vest. It was seen as a mental health incident, kind of a cry for help. I wonder what your reaction is. As a father, when you heard that, and also these attempted man overboard events that has been reported by the military times. Well, it's obviously terrifying. And because they're in a combat zone, communication is not regular. So you always wonder, every one of those sailors, and I didn't realize this, they kind of become like your own child. You think of them as a group.

Starting point is 02:41:45 They survive as a group. They work as a group. And you're concerned about every one of them, and we care about them. And so that is grieving to hear that people are pushed that limit mentally. And I think it makes us want to take a hard look at how this generation of sailors is being. prepared as as time goes on generations change and perhaps we need to reanalyze how we're training or preparing them or the timeline for deploying them. Has your child expressed any feelings of mental health strain and do you know if your

Starting point is 02:42:22 child feels that there are adequate resources to address that? I'm wondering if you could give any more of an insight into that. I've had very positive communications but I do know the boredom, the heat that's been out there, and I can't imagine the humidity, is taking its toll. I question about the supplies at the beginning, and we're hearing these reports, and this is the first time we're ever hearing these reports. And then it's hard to know what's true, what's exaggerated, and it's very worrisome. I will say on the parents' end, because you hear these things, even if you know they're not true,

Starting point is 02:43:01 or they might be grossly exaggerated. It is an extra amount of stress when your loved ones are at sea and you worry about them because, yes, they're in a combat zone. But as far as my particular child, rations got a little rough for a while, and I know conditions can be a little rough. I've never been on a carrier, and they have, so I can't speak to that, but I got to say they're keeping their chin up on this one.

Starting point is 02:43:31 And he clearly supports the agenda, it seems. Either way, the point is, you know, that they're struggling. Rations, people jumping off the ship. That's the only point to make. Not that it's necessarily as bad as what some may make it out to be. The point was that those were the only things they were arguing. The guy who was Andrew breaking it down was making the case of the things that we already knew about, and he got called a liar. I think that's pretty disgusting.

Starting point is 02:43:51 You know, what they're willing to do and what they actually care about. I mean, and let's realize what this is really about. This is not about Americans. I think most people have come to terms with that. I mean, really, just to, in fact, just to end, I'm going to plan on getting into the rest of this tomorrow. But really like the end with the point of pointing out Israel actually, but just really quickly we're going to talk about is the idea of more censorship. It builds to what we're talking about today and the idea of what's building around the, you know, the border. The biometric wall that they're building everywhere for you, not for immigrants, for you to keep, you know, it's, it is the control grid that we've been talking about and it's only building out.

Starting point is 02:44:27 This is a military contractor doing this domestically on the border, but, also domestically. And it's so clear what this amounts to. And we're going to get into that in the future show, talking about where it goes, flock cameras and what that amounts to, now suddenly showing up as traffic cones, no joke, literally hiding them as traffic cones. That's where this goes. Women being arrested for seven months. I actually recently talked about this because they identified the wrong car. Welcome to the future of where this goes, right? But all the towns where they put multiple, you know, hundreds of cameras and they literally verifiably have not only not improved the crime rate, in many cases, it's gotten worse.

Starting point is 02:45:08 You just can't, we told you this right in the beginning. Iran dismissing that there's any back channel calling them lies, yet again, the same stupid story as Trump pretends he's in control. And Iran says, you're a liar. We don't need that. You know, it's pretty obvious to see where this is. Trump on, what is it the, this was on the 17th. Iran wants to make a deal.

Starting point is 02:45:29 And then literally the next day he says there's no talks. I mean, does he not realize that he just said there was a deal? I mean, who knows? It's just embarrassing. Vance saying that they, you know, won't be charging previously, which we know is actually happening, but Trump ultimately threatening Oman, which I think is part of that, saying threatens to bomb Oman if it gets in the way.

Starting point is 02:45:51 What he's saying is Oman, don't work with Iran to give them control the strait. Oh, there will bomb you based on what? What legal grounds? oh, that's right, they bomb whoever they want, like Iran without any legal justification, and nobody does anything about it. But you still confuse about who the problem is here? He'll bomb anybody that gets in the way. I mean, come on, that's what criminals do.

Starting point is 02:46:11 Iran's president saying that they should end while they hold power, which I think is more about an effort to try to show the world like we want to resolve this. And we're in control, but we want to wrap this up. But who knows how that goes? The idea of Trump saying Iran's economy is about to collapse. but you even have central bank advisors saying that's not true. We can see that that's not the reality. Like, I think we all know this.

Starting point is 02:46:36 Trump's saying he'll launch the most crushing economic operation ever in Iran. And then Trump's or other Iran's officials saying U.S. focus on their economic warfare simply shows they failed militarily. Check, you know, chess here. And they're, you know, Trump's playing checkers is the whole joke. You know, it's obvious that they're behind and they're flailing. I mean, every day you could ask, is it, you know, is there something I'm missing? day one, we were asking that.

Starting point is 02:47:00 Like, is this Iran could be lying. Iran could be completely floundering, and this is them putting on a brave face. But at some point, you have to acknowledge that this is not what Trump is claiming. And it's just obvious that they have the upper hand here. Marjorie Telle Green literally suggesting that they're talking about using nukes in their conversations. Who knows if she's part of some scam? I don't know. Her saying that seems relevant to me.

Starting point is 02:47:21 Trump's simply saying, I'll just read what he said, by the way. We had no choice. I would have done it 100 times over. We can't have a nuclear weapon. as Mr. Sasha's frames it as, I'm owned by Israel. The American people don't want to hear, don't want this war,

Starting point is 02:47:32 but F them, I work for Israel. That's pretty much what he says in this. If you break every between the lines. Meanwhile, Israel is literally holding a U.S. hostage, U.S. citizen hostage, not the one that was let go before, but another one named Sama Safi. She's currently being held for months

Starting point is 02:47:48 as a U.S. citizen. Your government doesn't care. Normal stuff from the Israeli government, best ally in the world. You've got Netanyahu publicly stating, that they are, where was it right here? Netanyahu full, and this is something he said before, tells the world that he will single-handedly change the entire face of the Middle East,

Starting point is 02:48:08 oh, through the U.S. government, clearly, and that Israel will attack any country at any time. I've told you this, guys, they don't hide this when they're speaking in Hebrew in Israeli media. They say, we will do whatever. There's no law that will bind us. We're not legislate, but international law does not slow us down. They say this things constantly. As Patrick says, Israel's out of control.

Starting point is 02:48:27 They are by far the biggest. the peace in the region. In the world, guys, it's not even debatable, along with the United States. Francis Albanese, the most moral army, the most moral army strikes again. And again, and again, in the West Bank, soldiers and settlers cut water pipes, while Kursa's siege continues in the Gaza, the pulveration continues, and so the massacres. sends the ceasefire, Israel's killed a 12-100 people plus, including over 300 children. That's where we are. But, you know, another normal day for the Empire. Worth knowing what we're actually, what they're actually doing in the world today. But we'll leave it there for the day, guys. Important to break all this stuff down and see where

Starting point is 02:49:08 it goes and to think about alternatives, right? Think outside the box. Don't follow these paths they're laying out. Think about mother, you know, take your own trail. Find something new. Think of a different path forward because my God, we need it today. Leave it for there or leave it there for the day. Thank you for tuning in today. I love you all. Appreciate your support. If you want to continue supporting this platform, there's plenty of ways. to do it. We need your help. Thank you for tuning in. I love you all. As always, question everything. Come to your own conclusions. Stay vigilant. Number eight, we will finally complete the biometric entry exit visa tracking system,

Starting point is 02:49:45 which we need desperately. For years, Congress has required biometric entry exit visa tracking systems, but it has never been completed. The politicians are all talk, no action, never happens, never happens. Hillary Clinton all talks. Unfortunately, when there is action, it's always the wrong decision. Do you ever notice? In my administration, we will ensure

Starting point is 02:50:14 that this system is in place. And I will tell you, it will be on land, it will be on sea, it will be in air, we will have a proper tracking system.

The Last American Vagabond - The Anarchism Solution, Trump's Gavi Lie, FBI Manufactures Another Plot & US Military Censorship

There aren't comments yet for this episode. Click on any sentence in the transcript to leave a comment.