The Last American Vagabond - The Flock Revolution, ICE Continues Violating The Rights Of Americans & Trump Lies About Iran, Again

Starting point is 00:00:00 It starts with a simple question and ends in objective reality. Through our journey from there to here, we find one another and ourselves. And as the next 24 hours breaks free from our last, we gaze onward in reflection of the day. Welcome to the daily wrap up to the daily wrap up. Friday, July 10th, 2026. Thank you for joining me today. I have a lot to talk about today. But we are going to focus on a couple of important things that revolve around privacy, constitutional rights, surveillance, largely. And we're going to talk about the updates around Iran.

Starting point is 00:00:55 Again, as I keep mentioning when we talk about this, it's really no different than what you've been hearing from me over I don't know the last few months. There's new things happening. This is not the same moment we were talking about a month ago, but you won't be surprised to find out it's the exact same circumstance for Trump just lied yet again about what they said, you know, and we'll go over the same conversation. And it be objective about it because as always today we could be,

Starting point is 00:01:19 this could be the time that he's telling the truth. The reality, though, is that it's pretty frustrating to see where this is gone and the kind of cycle of dishonesty around the whole conversation and where that leads the American people. we're going to finish with that part of the story because honestly it's you know it's a very serious and and honestly one of the largest events happening in the world it's not it's very newsworthy but at the moment it's almost as if it's taken a back seat only because it's i mean honestly it's hard to even describe because part of me feels like it's on the precipice that don't

Starting point is 00:01:50 trump or is real or even iran could do something that could shove this into you know much more of a serious event and what's even there and i guess i should put it this way particular, this is being reported from an American perspective in regard to American foreign policy in the lives of Americans. But as you know, when we do this show, this is not about one group or the other. We fight for people around the world that are being oppressed, that are being misrepresented, people that are being lied about. But to explain, that's why I think I would frame it that way, because let's not forget. There are people in Lebanon who are being killed right as we speak because of what Israel is doing. There are people in Iran that are suffering and dying and even starving because

Starting point is 00:02:24 of what the U.S. and Israel have been doing to that country. So it shouldn't be something we diminish. But all that being said, it'll be talked about at the end of the show, like the latter part of it, only because it's something we in-depth discussed. And it hasn't really evolved that much from last we talked about it. But we're going to talk about an important kind of evolution around surveillance that is being sort of focused on the flock cameras, which I also think is a very important story. But I too sense a little bit of suspicion, a caution around why that's getting so much attention on platforms that would otherwise, I argue, suppress it.

Starting point is 00:02:57 But we shouldn't assume that's always why. happens. But let's get into that conversation to start today after a couple opening points that I think it's like a lot of the things we're discussing. It's very widely discussed, very widely acknowledged. And it's, I mean, as far as I can tell from my perspective, pushed back on by almost everybody, regardless of what side you're on, I find that really empowering, impactful, but maybe that's why it's being allowed to be discussed. If you look at it that way in order to drive us into a controlled version of that conversation. That's kind of how those things go. When these kind of revolutionary moments happen, that's the new form of suppression.

Starting point is 00:03:34 But we're also going to talk about some other important parts around all of that. Ice still utilizing the same technology we're going to talk about today that's overlap with flock, overlap with Israeli intelligence and cell bright and all the clear view AI and all the things we've been discussing. All have the same common threads and the same connections and the same problem. And it's very important to see where this all goes. And we're going to talk about how that relates to the bigger conversation as well as to Iran. But I want to get into that in particular part of this as it pertains to Americans and that growing awareness of what Israeli intelligence has to do with all this and what flock is saying about that, where this all kind of goes back to. But a few other things

Starting point is 00:04:13 we will get into, I think, are very important, but largely around surveillance. But let's start with a couple of points I wanted you to make sure you didn't miss from our previous conversations, one of which is our last show, the ongoing engineer division of the United States, fake page, versus fake patriots. Now, why I find this to be so important is it's something that I think everyone is paying attention to. There's nuanced opinions around a lot of it, but at the end of the day, it's fake. And not that everybody in that, this is not actually a real shot, but in the events of people that are marching or protesting or whatever you want to talk about, there's plenty of people involved in these that are real, that believe in what they're doing.

Starting point is 00:04:51 And whatever, whatever, however grotesque you may think the ideology is, in many cases, I agree. but there are people the tops of these that are clearly historically and in these cases proven to be manipulated or controlled if you will and so we end up in this weird situation where you've got like these artificial movements that are being framed as what it's it's the left right paradigm in an extended version because people aren't falling for it anymore i'm absolutely convinced about that and i hope you check out this episode and of course i could be wrong i was even just reading comments about this and somebody saying that you know that they don't agree with me on that but at least that i make sure to say that it's, I believe this.

Starting point is 00:05:27 It's not that I just choose to believe it. I think the evidence backs up my opinion. But at the same time, I do say that because I can't prove that. But I find it confounding or frustrating that people don't see, you know, it's not just some kind of faith-based opinion. I think it's very clear. There are markers all across this conversation that the very least suggest that the vast majority of people are just not buying the general larger kind of agendas.

Starting point is 00:05:52 Now, they still may see themselves in the two-party illusion. they may still vote for one or the other. My point is about a larger growing awareness that will, and everybody has their own kind of part of that that they're lurching into more than the other or seeing more than everybody else. But we're all evolving is kind of the point. At least that's what I believe.

Starting point is 00:06:09 And I think that's based up on the facts. I also had a great conversation with Charlie Robinson. We do our dual five-monthly show called What the Hell is happening and discussed a lot of the different points. Steve Poikinan joined us at the end, which you can check out. It was a great conversation. And of course, we also have a show today that we put out.

Starting point is 00:06:30 How Trump and Israel are crafting a new world order. Robert's been doing his foreign policy with Robert In Lecest Show for the Last American Bagabon and does a great job, breaking down why the Board of Peace is one piece, one part of a larger sort of global change, which is exactly what I'm seeing as well. And it is obvious they're trying to deliberately kind of redesign the global order. And maybe it's even something that they were only a part of or maybe saw else happening. You know, however you go to look at it, it's clear that they've taken advantage of that thing now for their benefit as they're failing in this agenda, as it looks, that appears that way

Starting point is 00:07:01 to me. We also talked with Derek Brose on the ninth. David Levitt, I think is the way we've been announcing it. So it's not confusing. But I forget, it always mixes me up because, you know, Caroline Leavitt. Levitt, David Levitt's rebranding and how the January 6 pipe bomber suspect got flocked. Now, that is overlap with the flock technology, but I meant it more to be sort of a kind of pun, you know, like got screwed based on the license plate reader technology.

Starting point is 00:07:26 And this is important to see. And we talked about a lot of stuff in this interview. But of course, Massey was the one calling this out and showing you that the, I mean, we've got over this. The shoe size difference, the difference in gate, the technology, using their technology, the evidence points to somebody other than the person they currently have, Brian Cole. And of course, Cash Patel and Bongino is yelling about how to success it all is. And I thought at top of that, I found it relevant that the way they got this guy was using cell phone towers and flock cameras, or rather just license plate readers.

Starting point is 00:07:55 So you can talk about the check out that interview. We also put out a great article on the ninth from Jason Bassler's first for TLAV. Eight ways to take down flock without a sawzol. Now this is an important article because I mean, like, and I talked about this with Derek too. But I hope this needs to be clear to people because we got to stand on these lines. Whether or not you agree with what people are doing in regard to the actual sawing of these things down, it is not, regardless of what the government tries to do, a crime. It's not, it's constitutionally protected for you to say anything.

Starting point is 00:08:25 by the way. Again, national security, all these different caveats. You can argue that's the case and should be, but the reality is, it's obvious these things are unalienable, not something that can be altered based on X, Y, and Z, fill in the blank. So the point would be, hypothetically speaking, if I'm saying, I think people should cut those down, you know, in a hypothetical conversation as if I would say that, kind of joking. The point is, that's not a crime to say that I think somebody should do that. I think somebody should go out and run for office. I think somebody should go out and, but you know, do anything. The point is, it's not a crime to express and a sentiment, even if you find the action to be distasteful or illegal. The crime is when, you know, shocking, you actually

Starting point is 00:09:02 commit the act. So what I want people to think about in this is you don't have to support the actual vandalism of this, and that is the category it would fall under, but we're talking about things that are inherently undeniably unconstitutional. We're going to talk about that today. And so too where all the rest of the cameras, by the way, they're all surveilling you. This is not some new evolution or the technology is. But These things are unconstitutional. There's tons of that. And so to say, oh, well, it's everywhere.

Starting point is 00:09:26 Well, then you can give up if you'd like. I don't want to. Let's start taking the ones in front of us. We can deal and acknowledge and start doing something about it. But my point would be that there are people that argue that going out of their, you know, it's an unjust system with unjust laws. And so why would we follow unjust laws? This is your own decision to make out there because realize if you go out there and do something like that,

Starting point is 00:09:46 they have, they'll probably come to your door with a gun as the government, you know, because that's what they do. The point, though, is that this is something that is within each person's decision-making process to think if they decide something like this needs to be stopped. Now, I support people that are out there taking action they think is against an unjust system and taking town thought cameras that they believe are, that are in fact violating the riots. But to go out and do it is a different story. If I do that, that would be my decision. It might likely wouldn't be something I'd promote only because it would be something that they could come and arrest you for. All that being said, discussing this is not a crime.

Starting point is 00:10:21 and acknowledging that you agree or support somebody doing something like that's also not a crime. So make sure you understand that. But what's important is that there are eight ways and plenty more to do something about this that's not kinetic action or violence or vandalism or whatever you would call it. And I think it's an important article. And the reason I said all of that is because Jason, as you can look online, clearly supports the actions against unconstitutional surveillance. But he also wants you to know that there's plenty of other ways that you can engage with this

Starting point is 00:10:47 if you decide. And just to quickly break it down, ask your city to provide flock to prove that it works. So this is already coming out that you actually engage with them and their own data ultimately shows that they're not getting the results that were promised. They point to flock data about other circumstances that make that allegation. But it seems it's not even doing what they claim it does. But at the very least hold them accountable for that. If you're paying for it, then you damn well better be proving to us regularly that it's doing what you think it should. find the contract before renewal. This is kind of a larger point for a lot of things.

Starting point is 00:11:22 Don't wait for the contract to be in front of you. Don't wait for the event to be happening. Don't wait for the cameras to be installed around you. Let's stand up before we get there. So as again, plenty of points I could make today. Had we done something when we were screaming about this years ago, we might not even be in this position. But here we are.

Starting point is 00:11:38 So let's take that mindset and do something now. So we don't wake up in the middle of this problem tomorrow when the new media is yelling about the breaking, story when it's too late to do anything about it. So find the contract before the renewal and get planning. Get people around you. Get the local community. Get the local government if they support you. Ask for the privacy review. Getting into the details of the privacy because trust me, guys, that they don't care about your privacy. As one local group from the government already revealed, they just remove the line from the contract that said they wouldn't sell it after people signed the

Starting point is 00:12:09 contract. That's just criminal. Show up before the decision is made. Be engaged with this process. Right? Most surveillance systems don't appear overnight. I see right. They usually go through committee meetings and budget discussions. Get involved. If you feel this will make a difference, I do, at least in regard to things like this, get involved. Follow the money. Surveillance often expands because someone else offers to pay for it as the Department of Justice, for example. Because it's not like they have some larger nefarious agenda to install this all across the country. The point is they'll pay for it. Local communities or local governments will decide they think it's free, but it ultimately is still coming out of your pocket. ask who can search the database.

Starting point is 00:12:47 You'll quickly find out if they're honest, it's far more than you realize. And we'll get into that today, including with ICE and government contracts and government entities where they claim they can't look at the database except when you just barely look. It turns out they totally can because they just go, we don't allow that, but we allow groups to do that that they then allow ICE to look through. So it was a total plan, guys, and we'll get into that, like usual, by the way. So in case that was unclear, we will go through it again. They have databases that they claim ICE and other force,

Starting point is 00:13:15 are allowed to just peruse, except the problem is that they do have groups that are allowed to look at it, and those groups work with ICE and work with the police departments. Or let's just make it clear, work with the OS government. So the US government has access to all of that, and this is not even hard to find. Request the audit logs, compare crime before and after. And it includes a bunch of other links that you can look to to find out where the cameras are, how to stop them, how to, you know, any number of great database, great websites full of information, and some different things you can post.

Starting point is 00:13:47 He'll hopefully write some more. I think this is a good topic that shouldn't be ignored. Now, we will get to the point about, you know, the interesting concern about this topic in general right now, not about the surveillance, but why it's being allowed to be discussed and why it's seemingly being in some ways promoted, if you want to call it that,

Starting point is 00:14:03 hopefully I'll remember I'll get into that, by people that are clearly not really on the side of the agenda. The usual suspects out there spinning the wheels about whatever the establishment screams about, and that's Trump's administration right now, and are now certainly going, block cameras and quoting what the news said and not really saying good or bad.

Starting point is 00:14:21 It's weird. And I'll get into that in a second. Now, before we get into the deep part of the conversation, I wanted to highlight this. Jason was talking with me about this. I had this tweet that I saved, one, because I just wanted the mask. I wanted to look into the different things

Starting point is 00:14:34 you can use to block AI cameras and so on. He posted this on Twitter. They deleted the post. Now, for the podcast, here's what it says. Now, I get the sense it's because of deflock hunters. But again, how in the world do you even know what that means? What if it's people that are simply looking for flock cameras to protest? You see my point?

Starting point is 00:14:55 To assume you know what that means is what this, it's subjective censorship because Twitter has an agenda, just like it always has. Jack, Elon, same deal. Pro tip number one, Jason Wright, always leave your phone at home. Number two, never film yourself. And it goes also just wanted to point out that this mask is only, $24.97 on Timu. Happy hunting. They deleted that post. They said that it violated the Twitter rules. I mean, guys, just take a second and think about that. What in this is promoting violence? I mean, but what they want to say is that this means wink, wink, that he's promoting the idea of going out and vandalizing these things.

Starting point is 00:15:32 Okay. First of all, that's a very minor thing in the context of people out there screaming about progenocide tactics and literally going kill the children in Gaza. They're terrorists. They're just insane. All over the world. all over this platform, by the way. Muslims shouldn't be in any position anywhere. Laura will scream every day. The point is, they have a right to say those things, and I have right to call them disgusting. For them to tell you that this is supposed to be not there

Starting point is 00:15:54 because it's promoting anything, violence, it's such a hypocritical move. So you can decide what you think it's about. No matter what way you want to spin this, I mean, again, back to the point, let's say he is going, go cut those things down. How is that a crime? Is he cutting them down?

Starting point is 00:16:08 Is it a crime for you to yell into the wind, go do something that might be? I mean, guys, we need. to realize what a dangerous slope this is. People like Elon and the rest are absolutely playing their part. So, by the way, here, if you would like to buy that mask, it's right here. Please go and buy it and please post it all over Twitter. And please make sure you share that screenshot, which I'll have included of Jason hoisting that. And call out Twitter for censoring completely legal constitutional speech all over this platform. Now, before we get

Starting point is 00:16:35 into the flock part more particular and more specifically, again, the technocracy growing in this government can't be denied. I'll include the detachment to a one point, which you've probably seen, which is simply Palantir, meta, and Open AI being given positions of a level of a colonel in the military. Not some white lab coat,

Starting point is 00:16:54 but an actual military colonel, which can then direct anybody under them anywhere in the military. Look it up for yourself. It's insane. It's technocracy and uniform, as I called it. Well, we also recently highlighted that Mark Andresen,

Starting point is 00:17:05 British and Harowitz, one of the lead, like, technocratic drivers of the current conversation, and I don't mean that's facetious. These people are advocating publicly for what we're all fighting. June 29th, 2026, Department of War establishes a defense policy board, which includes Mark Andreessen. Great.

Starting point is 00:17:23 It's totally not some obvious technocratic transition, which simply means the technocrats, the technical leaders in AI and technology are the ones that are going to ultimately have leading positions. This is what they're, we're watching this transition happen. The new point is, of course, we barely even got into Kevin Warsh, by the way, which is an obvious, you know, an alarming pointy by Trump that got very little attention. It's just, it's one after another of like exactly what he told you he would not support. And he's lying to you.

Starting point is 00:17:50 Surprise, surprise. But as Catherine Austin Fitz writes, oh, and by the way, guys, don't forget, this is, there's an account going around that's got way too many followers that's not Catherine Austin Fitz. It's lying and it's just manipulating and people see. I see people share it all the time who think, who should know better. It's not Catherine. This is their only account.

Starting point is 00:18:09 Now, looks like Warsh is going full-on digital control grid, she writes. Kevin Warsh picks, can you guess? Well, first of all, ex-B-O-E chief Marvin King and, of course, technocracy boss Mark Andreessen. A totally different post, guys. So in two, I mean, in a process of a week and a half, he gets two major government positions. Now, look, the Federal Reserve is technically not the government, but understanding what it actually leads to, it is part of this control structure. And this is July 9th, Federal Reserve.

Starting point is 00:18:39 announces the leadership and objectives of the task force to advance the conduct of monetary policy. The five task forces will examine areas central to the board conduct of monetary policy, access the economic impact of new general purpose technologies, including AI, and to inform the Federal Reserve's policy judgment, Mark Endreson of Andreessen, Harrowitz. I just, it's far too much, guys, for this not to be acknowledged for what it is. Now I'm going to play a clip really quickly. I'll be right back. Nobody will be safe if not everybody is vaccinated. Are you vaccinated if I'm a yes, yeah, yeah.

Starting point is 00:19:17 Yeah, I mean, I'm very pro-vaccination. We've, the science is unequivocal. Can you imagine that in 10 years when we are sitting here, we have an implant in our brains and I can immediately feel because you all will have implants? Just think of sensors planted into our brains. basically implanted in your skull. But it would be flush with your skull. So you basically take out a chunk of skull,

Starting point is 00:19:49 replace, put the neuralic device in there. You put the electrode, you'd insert the electrode threads very carefully into the brain. It doesn't change what you are doing. It changes you if you take a genetic editing. It's a fusion of, the physical, the digital, and the biological world.

Starting point is 00:20:12 That's really the essence of the fourth industrial revolution. A merger with biological intelligence and machine intelligence. An effort for man to merge with machine in a healthy way. Yes. To beat machines, you basically have to merge with machines. Most likely, yes. As work is changing, is a universal basic income really a solution to this problem? I think ultimately we will have to have to have

Starting point is 00:20:37 some kind of universal basic income and I think some kind of a universal basic income is going to be necessary decarbonization of the economy where are they traveling how are they traveling what are they eating what are they consuming on the platform so individual carbon footprint tracker mm stay tuned we don't have it operational yet but this is something that we're working on I mean my top recommendation honestly would be just to have a carbon tax this global reset is necessary. So let's talk about flock cameras that are going to play a major role in building this control grid that are clearly building around us as we speak. So what's important to understand

Starting point is 00:21:20 here, guys, is, and we will come back to the idea of the flock cameras in general. The point, though, is that this is something like in the suspicion kind of concern for it, but what's important because there's far more than just flock cameras. Like, I think that's really important to understand. Like, this is one part of a much larger thing. So one of the concerns is ultimately that maybe this is being focused on as sort of a bait and switch, if you will, which just happened many times before, right? That ultimately we're talking about the, you know, a problem, which may even very well be actually part of the problem. But then ultimately gets too much attention. So it becomes sort of a cut and cut and cut bait and run kind of thing.

Starting point is 00:22:02 We dump that one and we lean into everything else. So it's never always, it's never one channel, one thing. you know, it's a multifaceted kind of adjustment when the agenda's like this are playing out. And this is not my opinion. You can look through history and not know everything they were thinking, but see examples of things that we can later prove that there was decisions that were made based on the way people responded where the agenda went a different direction. This is what they do, right?

Starting point is 00:22:25 So here we are with the flock camera discussion and where this is building out. So as we discuss this one, it is happening, and it does matter simply because it's constitutional violations. But at the same time, let's be skeptical of, of, of, what the focus may be, right? So, Jason, post this. And this is simply getting into the examples of people who are continuing to violate, whatever you would call it.

Starting point is 00:22:52 They're, you know, people, like police officers who have access to this stuff, who are using it inappropriately. And it's happening everywhere. And I mean, I've talked about many, every time I even discussed this, I've had a new example of one of them. And look, I don't even know why it's hard for some people to accept or, like, why there's pushback, every single example where there's been something to abuse in history of the U.S. government, it has been abused. Challenge me on that. So in this case, he says, well,

Starting point is 00:23:18 it happened again. Another officer caught up using flock systems, caught by an audit, which raises the real question, how often does this happen when nobody is looking? This pattern isn't an exception. It's a feature of surveillance architecture. Now, what you're going to get, and the reason I want to talk about this first, valid concern. And the point, first of all, that, well, it's a it's a audit. So people will go, well, does not mean that it's working? That's a fair point, but it depends on what we're talking about. We'll come back to that next.

Starting point is 00:23:47 But so this person says, Ryan, I'm a longtime fan, but the amount of times that you and Jason have tweeted the same warnings about flock in the last week has become suspicious. Now, who knows if that's good intentions or not? First of all, flaw in regard to me tweeting about flock, it's few and far between, frankly. It's been tweeting of other people, Jason, one of them, who are doing good work on that. Regardless, I don't know what's exactly suspicious about focusing

Starting point is 00:24:12 on a topic other than being worried that that might then mean that there's something very like manipulative about the topic. If you get what I'm saying. Because question my intentions, question is intentions, question everybody, question everything. Don't just say that for fun, guys. But what I'm saying is what is it suspicious about it other than the act of posting it many times, which is a fair concern, like maybe. But you see, the suspicion is only that you're worried that there may be something to be suspicious about, which is a secondary thing, because the reality is, the content is solid. He's pointing out real concerns. He's giving you real things you can do about it, and he's consistently highlighting the fact that it's being abused, and he's doing good

Starting point is 00:24:48 work on that. So I hope you get what I'm saying there, is that I get the sense of being worried about if we're being misguided down a path, even about a real topic. We should always be thinking about that today. But what is it that, you know, it's, unless, there's a reason to doubt it, keep that in your mind and be on guard. Question us every time we put something out. But unless there's an actual reason to question it or to think that there's dishonesty, it shouldn't become the assumption that it is manipulative just because he's saying that something this other guy says that you don't like or whatever the mindset is. Question at all, but have valid reason to actually call it out. This is something we do with all these people every day,

Starting point is 00:25:24 talking about the different new media manipulators out there who aren't just going, look, flock's bad, but using manipulative tactics to talk about something that undermines the larger point that people like Jason are actually making. Now it says, especially since one, so many bad actors are doing the same. See, that's kind of what's guiding it. Number two, it's not censored at all. Fair point. But see, this is what I'm getting to. Now, it's one of two ways to look at this. And I'm taking this as if this is a genuine thought from a person who actually cares about our content. Because I think it's a real concern. It could be anyway from other people out there, whether this is genuine or not, which is that ultimately, if something is censored on this platform, or rather,

Starting point is 00:26:01 anything can be. We've seen censorship constantly, but something being censored or not is not a defining factor of whether or not is real. I mean, this is what I want us to think about. Like, that's like saying because the mainstream media says it, therefore we know the opposite is true. Like, first of all, are we going to think that they as the establishment manipulators can't think beyond that point and go, oh, well, if they think that, then let's just tell them the truth. They'll assume it's false. Like, it's very simple secondary point. So, think about that, is that whether a censored or not doesn't then prove one or the other. It could. It's just a data point. And really, no matter what they do, it should be the individual

Starting point is 00:26:34 choice, whoever is doing this, to look for themselves. Okay, so someone's posting a lot of this content. Did you look at the content? Is there a wrong? Is there a problem with the content? Is there something that's being said that you find dishonest or manipulative? If the answer is no, then what are we talking about? Like, even if the point is the conversation's being used and you falling into that is you somehow inadvertently being used to promote a larger manipulative narrative, it still doesn't make him dishonest unless he's choosing to be dishonest if his content is accurate and well done. Now, this can be confusing for some people, but I find this to be very important because right now there's a lot of honest people who have fallen into sort of

Starting point is 00:27:10 their own false binary, which is that it's, you know, there's not nuance anymore. And in this case, there's fair question to ask whether we're supposed to be talking about flock, but that doesn't mean talking about flock is inherently dishonest or part of a problem. But ask these questions, as I will every day, especially since I sense the same thing, and I'll show you why with plenty of people out there who are leaning into this conversation in very weird ways. But my sense so far, if you want to hear it, and it's my opinion, is that these are people trying to sort of get on top of a conversation that has gotten out of control for the establishment. It could be wrong. That's how I feel this makes sense right now. And I'll adjust that as we go forward if new information

Starting point is 00:27:49 comes along. Max says nobody in the mainstream is talking about flock, so his emphasis is justified. So this other person is their perspective and they're right, is that we're not getting not in the kind of conversation like this. You're getting mainstream that largely goes vandals, and that's it. So it depends on whether we think Twitter is a new version of that versus mainstream media versus independent alternate in mainstream alternative media. Yeah, at the same point, just why it's so visible. These are fair concerns. So keeping that in your mind, let's make sure we're questioning whether or not this is we're supposed to talk about this and that's why i started with the point of even because we should be criticizing the unconstitutional nature of any of these things

Starting point is 00:28:27 but maybe they want us to overfocus on it because there's three other companies being built that we don't see something like that beyond guard for that and remember this is only one of a much much much much larger thing that today's show alone will make very clear but plenty more to get into the badged patriot says this reading many of the comments regarding regarding flock cameras is quite obvious. Many have no idea on the operations of it or safeguards installed, which is probably fair. I'll leave my point for when I comment here, but that's a fair statement. I mean, there's probably plenty of people, ourselves included, that probably don't have full, all, you know, information about everything they're doing on what they say they do to keep

Starting point is 00:29:09 everything safe. But is that really the relevant point? He says they post an article on an officer, which I just showed you, that abused it, which is one of a endless string of them, by the way, to prove their point. And this person says, and I smile because that proves the safeguards work. Well, it depends on whether you think the safeguard was constantly being enacted and they're constantly catching them if they're there or that this was a retroactive decision. You know, it's nuanced in and of itself. And you have to take their word for it. I don't know why anybody would do that. There's a reverence here for authority, clearly the bad Patriot. But I said, so because the safeguards worked, we just accept the overt violation of our

Starting point is 00:29:46 constitutional rights. You're starting on second base here, man. Like, we should be talking about debating whether these can be used properly, or rather we should not be debating about whether they should be used properly. We should be discussing the fact that however they are used, they violate our rights. Now, there even should be a conversation there. We have a collective conversation, if that's even possible today of American people and say, well, do we argue? that what we perceive to be our safety benefits from this outweigh our rights. And if we argue that, then we need to reimagine everything, right? Because you don't then just go, well, that one.

Starting point is 00:30:22 No, no, this is a whole conversation about unalienable rights, all of it. So one of them getting bastardized me, and we're long past that conversation, by the way, but people are starting to, you know, dive into it for the first time, which ultimately becomes the idea that these things, you know, if they're violating your rights, we need to have the conversation and decide whether you want to lean into that for whatever it gains you if you think it does versus standing true to the foundational elements of this country. That's this simple. And look, just if you don't know, more than once, these things have been ruled unconstitutional. And understand surveillance broadly not aimed

Starting point is 00:30:56 at anything in particular, that that is unconstitutional. We have a right to our privacy. Now you could argue that a private location, for example, has the right to film, like if I'm filming my front yard and you walk by that camera, that's not, that's my property. But the point is we're talking about the government who then applies that mindset to everywhere we don't have private location. And that is a violation. The government was never meant to do something like that. And how many times you have to cite the founding fathers as you act like, you know, as left and right of our government scream while they believe in the founding fathers, while they bastardize everything they ever thought up? And you can question what they meant to

Starting point is 00:31:29 themselves. But I said, I also don't think that the safeguards work, just in case that wasn't clear. As far too much evidence exists to demonstrate that. But let's start. with whether they're even constitutional. Spoiler alert, they're not. So Flock responds to somebody who I don't support, basically saying, basically saying five former Georgia police officers have been arrested for charged this. Yes, this person likes to make themselves the focal point. But Flock says this is exactly what our safeguards were designed to do. Wait, what? What? This is thousands of first responders use Flock to solve crime. Our permanent audit logs help identify and stop individuals, individual case of illegal use. Okay, well, you're talking about five people. So first,

Starting point is 00:32:09 First of all, why is this this deflection to, well, look, we caught them. Okay, well, why are we opening the door to this possible abuse in the first place? When you can prove they're not catching little really everybody abusing this stuff, especially when they're at, like, or how about the point is, I'm sure glad you caught them after they abused my rights, after he spied on his girlfriend while she was in the shower or whatever, which is a bad example, but whatever, as they were walking down the street. The point becomes, why are we allowing them in the first place?

Starting point is 00:32:34 If you really draw the line correctly, which is your rights first matter, not, is it, okay, well, it's a violation, but does it keep you safe? We've already lost the point. And secondarily, what you love, here's even Twitter. Well, the officer's misused was detected through an internal audit by the police department. So here you have flock lying to you. And this is the flock account that has very little support. It's 6,000 followers, which is crazy to me.

Starting point is 00:32:59 And yet it comments under anyone talking about it and blocks comments under everything of posts. By the way, you can come comment here, which keeps happening because everyone knows they block every comment. that's why everybody comes here and goes, nobody believes in you and you're a criminalized. And this guy blocks almost everybody. It's just he's the one calling you a terrorist for pushing back against things that are unconstitutional. But my point is that they're trying to frame this as,

Starting point is 00:33:22 and I guess he, because he's the one that manages the count, that they are the ones doing the due diligence. We caught them because that's how it works. Guess what? He lied. They caught it. And they then used that to claim flocks doing its job. That's one clear example.

Starting point is 00:33:37 But guys, they're inherently to, on if they're choosing to mislead you for their benefit. That's an alarming company. Here's another example. Three-month-old baby safely recovered after abduction in Marshall County. This is last night, a three-month-old that was kidnapped in Marshall County was located with a flock camera in totally different county. Crime solved. Missing people found every single day. Well, guess what? Not true. Local community members claim the police stated that flock was not even necessary, that it appears flock may have been paying news agencies for favorable coverage. You've got to love this. How continually this happens.

Starting point is 00:34:08 But whatever, right? Let's let's let the company that's legally spying on us continue to lie about how it's doing things in your benefit while they knowingly do the opposite. That's not just criminal, guys. That's nefarious. Orwell Day points out they are trying to bargain with us now. They're making the argument that flock is okay if we, quote, demand transparency and surveillance. See how they're moving the goalpost a little bit? And they write, no, we demand that the cameras don't exist at all.

Starting point is 00:34:36 We demand that the cameras come down. nothing less is acceptable. So knowing that most people, and I hope you can see that if they're doing this, that means that at the very least the establishment feels most people don't support this, they're pushing the goalpost to say, well, then fine, we give in, we'll demand,

Starting point is 00:34:52 why wouldn't that be the starting point? It answers the question for you, right? But it's about not violating our rights in the first place. Now, Texas in Seattle writes, hey, this guy is the CEO of flock. and says, hey, Greg, or is it Greg? I believe it's, uh, yeah, or Garrett Langley. Of course, interesting last name. I was the head of design for connected devices at Axon when we did the deal with Block. Texas and Seattle rights. What you may know, may not know, is that our CEO, Rick Smith,

Starting point is 00:35:22 had met with a vigilant, an automatic license plate reader at the time, a LPR. During the demo, their team pulled up a random Exxon, A-X-O-N for the podcast, Axon employees car. a random employee's car from the parking lot and showed the axon leadership everywhere that car had been. I mean, think about how dystopian that is. Like, you haven't even, you are being interviewed for the use of this,

Starting point is 00:35:51 and your cell is to go look, you can see where that person's car has been. I mean, we're being lied to about what this is all about. That's what people are finding out. It says, I wasn't in the meeting, but I'm told Rick immediately kicked them out out of the Scotthale office. You can make a good case,

Starting point is 00:36:07 for officers? Hell, even politicians wearing body cameras because it empowers citizens to watch the watchers, even though they so casually go, oops, they forgot it, oops, the battery died every time they need to. Flock offers no such benefit. Likely, you'll justify the surveillance state you're helping create with platitudes of safer society. But America, now the latter part of this is his opinion and I'll point out parts I disagree with, but America wasn't founded to be safe. America was found it to be free. Block is much more compatible with totalitarian countries like China, the UK. Well, let's be real. It's the same point, guys. The UK, the United States, China, despite their own deviation, or rather points of excelling, if you look at it that way,

Starting point is 00:36:48 more social credit, more surveillance. They're the same thing, guys. They're all aiming in the same direction. So even if this person has good intention, I guess the argument is to keep America free, even though it's really not at the moment. It's maybe more so than some or in other ways, more than other, you know, bottom line is, it's, if you think, I mean, I agree with what he's saying. Let's put it that way. That whether or not it is what he thinks it is, that's what we should be fighting for. Yes, go shuck it off onto other groups. But the point would be that ultimately they're all dealing with the same thing. And it's not about one country. It's about the people, society, all of us, fighting against power structures that want to keep us under their thumb.

Starting point is 00:37:23 And so my point is that any of these are dealing with the same thing. And we're no better off than the UK or China for that matter. But it says, as Benjamin Franklin famously summarized, America's ethos of rugged individualism. Quote, those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety. Now, kindly get the flock out of America. I agree, you know, I mean, I think it's an important thing to consider. Now, this is an article from 2025 in May.

Starting point is 00:37:53 License plate reader company flock is building a massive people lookup tool leak shows. 2025. And a lot of this goes way back into Trump's first administration. But in this case, we're talking about not just the flock camera, but in ICE and police and different groups using this to retroactively look people up on the database.

Starting point is 00:38:16 So it's not just reading your license plate and trying to find crimes. People are using this to find people, which we already know. But they're lying about this. ICE is using it to this day. And so too are plenty of other government-connected elements that are using it that are in ways that they argue is not allowed to be used.

Starting point is 00:38:33 But you've seen this go around. The images and the reality. I just want people to show it goes back a long way and that it's been being used as something other than what they promised from the very beginning. Secure Privacy here writes, the DHS signed, the Department of Homeland Security, signed a $1 billion contract merging passport data, IRS records, HHS files, FBI databases, license plate readers, commercial data brokers into a single targeting system.

Starting point is 00:39:01 ISIS surveillance budget alone, $28.7 billion, more than some country's GDPs. This is nothing if not surveillance infrastructure. I agree. I mean, think about how do you explain this other than a massive surveillance database? I mean, aimed at us. But look, you don't even need to sell people on that because Trump is literally telling you that's what it's about, but he's just only highlighting the group that you think is the problem. and that he changes that based on he's talking to, frankly.

Starting point is 00:39:28 But as long as he goes, it's where all the bad ones over there, immigrants, a friend of Araga, the Democrat. Well, the point is, whoever ends up having control of that, which guess what, it becomes just the government, who we love to pretend is one or the other, the side, the left, or the right? No, it's just the government. The government that loves to pit us against each other so it can take more power over our lives that will now have that power

Starting point is 00:39:48 and we'll be used on whoever they want to pretend the next person is. Or if you want to think Democrats will be used against you next. This is a surveillance infrastructure, a control grid, as Catherine calls it, it's not even debatable anymore. And this is the contract in case you want to read more into it from February, 2026. The DHS opens a billion dollar tab with, yep, Palantir, which you already know. We've covered this extensively. This is all just kind of weaving through all of this to show you how it all ties together, and this wasn't by accident.

Starting point is 00:40:15 But again, think about the unsililied information, right? The things that used to be separate that are now jammed into one database to better surveil you, who better control you, and of course, who has access to that. Israel. Foreign, for other, other tech companies, Palantir. And this is not even debatable. All of this is a problem. All of this is illegal.

Starting point is 00:40:33 All of this is unconstitutional. But guess what? They don't seem to care about that. John Rich, of course. And you might have seen this going around. Body cam footage. There's so many examples like this. Body cam footage of Minnesota in Minnesota reveals a man who reviews cars.

Starting point is 00:40:50 Was surrounded by police because a flock camera mistakenly said his vehicle was stolen. it was not. And this, they get violent. I mean, this is one of the examples where they're truly violent, but I'll show you some of the ice examples where that keeps happening. But as John Rich says, this is not right. Flock cameras are leading to what amounts to the swatting of people like this man. This could have ended very badly. It seems to me to be unconstitutional. Seems to be. Geez, I'm wondering why you're being so swish-washy. It's, yeah, it is unconstitutional, John, which you would say if it was Biden doing it.

Starting point is 00:41:21 The point is, you guess who this is going to, I mean, right now, this is rolling out under the purview of Donald Trump's administration. And these people seem to be, you know, bending over backwards to not be like, why are you doing that? Like, why aren't you calling out Donald Trump's administration? Why aren't you calling out any number of elements that lead right back to what they're all literally building, Palantir included? Just standing up and kind of just broadly into the air going, it's bad, and we see it. And then not, I mean, I'm glad he's at least saying that. But what it shows you is these people all know this is a problem and I guess are just too afraid now that he has

Starting point is 00:41:54 a position in Trump's government to call out who's actually pushing this. But it's not just Trump either. It's been rolling out long before it was also goes back in first administration of Trump. It's all of your government, guys. But just think about that. How you're not going to have the courage to call out what's actually driving this? More perfect union, which by the way put out a post, we're going to talk about the next show, highlighting exactly what we've been talking about with Prospera, Peter Thiel on the network state agenda. This has got like 700,000 views. Great. I'm really, really happy that's getting discussed. But I just find it crazy how we can bang our head against a wall with, you know, you know,

Starting point is 00:42:29 same old story. But more Perfect Union reports, Cleveland organized to get rid of flock and won. But instead of accepting the democratic process, the mayor and the city council president forced to re-vote. Do you know what party they ascribe to, ladies and gentlemen? So residents are coming out again to testify against the AI surveillance company and some are spitting fire. Yeah, so Republican led.

Starting point is 00:42:51 And of course, it's not a secret. and that's not about one side of the other. Both parties, all of our government, all of them benefit from this guys. But for those that somehow think it's not applicable to this current power structure, they are absolutely in this case ignoring what people want and doing it anyway. Shouldn't be hard to see. It's everywhere. And support clock and a whole.

Starting point is 00:43:11 Cameras don't prevent a crime as our previous comment I made. We do need to invest in our youth and our cities. You know, there's a lot of complaints in the last week, right? It was really hot. We had power outages. the pools aren't all open. That's the stuff that your residents want, and that would help reduce crime,

Starting point is 00:43:28 because it gives people a place to go, and something to do, they're not frustrated. Why do people commit crime? Because they're desperate. They're not trying to cry because they're, you know, well-off and all of their needs are met. Their needs are not met, and that's why their community leaves cries. So we need to focus on helping our residents

Starting point is 00:43:45 live good lives in the city, and obviously we need to trip to police with resources, but those resources don't need to be for-profit companies' goals to increase shareholder value. That's how a for-profit tech company works. Their goal is to get as big as possible and then either go into public stock exchange or sell to someone else and make our investors money. We are not their investor. They're not in for us. We are their products. Our data is their products. And they're not going to always be honest. You cannot trust a big tech company not fly. We know this from many other big tech companies. It's never a

Starting point is 00:44:18 surprise. It's sort of how business works, unfortunately. And so we need to keep them out of our city and focus on nonprofit and government solutions that we control and have access to. And it's just sort of built for the people. By these people. There's not for people in the city that help us do them. I think that's all that's said. I know for a time, but I hope you can see you vote know. Again, we are going to meet this old two years ago. It's been at. See, the end of the Right. Yep. And then ignore it anyway, did what they wanted.

Starting point is 00:44:51 Not new. Right. I mean, I don't think there's anybody in government at this point that's on our side. I mean, I think it's a rapidly dwindling, you know, the sociopaths recognize the benefit. I mean, I don't know how it's just so continual that this seems to be the reality. And we'll show you a clip in a minute from a other local local government where they're being asked directly whether they have NDAs for data centers. They won't even answer the question. You know, these people are profiteerists, guys.

Starting point is 00:45:19 They're stuffing their pockets. And the people that are actually potentially doing it for the right reasons get pushed out. Because nobody, it's like a corrupt police department, right? You're the one that's going to do the job without stealing money. Well, you're going to get killed. You're going to get fired because you're going to, nobody trusts the one that doesn't take any money. You know, like that's, it's like this is where we are today. And I don't think that's even hard to see.

Starting point is 00:45:39 Just a story you might have seen going around. This is just an AI sort of the video somebody made about it. But this is being widely discussed where they're now, it's just Cape. Cape Corral, leaders are proposing AI cameras on trash, on garbage trucks to scan your homes and your yards for code violations. I'm sure the HOA is going to love that. High grass, unpermitted renovations. I mean, my God.

Starting point is 00:46:02 And it says we already have flock cameras on polls watching the streets. Now this, now to be clear, this is being proposed as far as I can tell and happened yet, but this is all, this is not one location. This is a person saying Dallas has hundreds of these. I mean, whether it's the trash case, it's. we are being inundated with massive on like once it becomes ubiquitous surveillance it's going to be well it's everywhere so who care that's what they're already trying to create all of this violates our rights oh and here's just an article case you want to read more on that cape kraal exploring AI cameras on track

Starting point is 00:46:32 trash trucks for trash truck garbage truck code enforcement really make sure you're grass a certain i mean so let's go ahead and violate your conscience of rights to make sure the grass is a certain level shows you how little they care orville day points out flock has been used to target journalists the press freedom of the press. This is the article that got this journal was tracked by police using flock cameras for weeks until the eventual police confrontation. Do you think he was targeted because of his anti-flock position? License plate cameras will soon track phones, wearables, infotainment, and even your pets.

Starting point is 00:47:03 I was just talking about this. This is not a joke. We just talked about this, guys. I want to play a clip of some next generation type surveillance to put in your mind like where this is. I mean, first of all, already is. Not to say that flock cameras do. this, but where the tech already is.

Starting point is 00:47:19 So we need to consider where this is going, but just realizing that the idea of what the Leonardo signal trace, additional things, which are very clearly part of this conversation, many argue are already happening. All they do is add it to the flock device. It's already there. You

Starting point is 00:47:35 wouldn't even know the difference. And it can absorb your text messages. And it can spy on people to a degree that is, you know, some people don't even think is real. And so I want you to think about where the tech already is and whether or not this is something your government capable of. The latest paper, the one that happened even after this, which is already better, uses stable

Starting point is 00:47:54 diffusion, uses the thing that you use to make art. Like what should a thing that you use to make art have anything to do with reading your brain? But of course it goes further. So in this one, they said, can they understand the inner monologue, the things you're saying to yourself in your own mind? By the way, when you dream, your dream, like your visual cortex runs in reverse. So your dreams are no longer safe.

Starting point is 00:48:16 But we'll try this. So they had people watch a video and just narrate what was going on in the video in their mind. So there's a woman, she gets hit in the back, she falls over. This is what the computer reconstructed the person thinking. See a girl looks just like me, get hit in the back, and then she is knocked off. So our thoughts are starting to be decoded. Yeah. Just think about what this means for authoritarian states, for instance.

Starting point is 00:48:47 Or if you want to generate images, is that maximally activate your pleasure sensor, anything else. Okay, but let's keep going, right? To really get the sense of the combinatorics of this. Real quick additional point, the images that, you know, the, whatever he said, the, the pleasure sensors, like, think about that in the context of how AI is creating things today, like in the sense of things that are not just made in, like, a song you enjoy, but actually, like, manipulates you into wanting it more, even though being like the actual

Starting point is 00:49:16 song. Like, it gets into weird stuff like that, which is not a, not hypothetical. You know, it's not just having a passion song that resonates with you, but having some kind of manipulated, you know, I mean, whether you're talking about music or video, videos are a very different thing when you get into like the neuroscience side of it. But these are not hypotheticals. Even though people will choose to act like it's crazy that you said that, you can show plenty of ongoing, decades old science talking about this kind of stuff. What I'm saying is today with the artificial intelligence created content that it goes to another level than just making things sound good or look good.

Starting point is 00:49:50 It's a manipulative side of this. And I think that's being employed. And so what he's saying on top of that is how this can be sort of a, you know, at least as I'm hearing it, I'm looking at it sort of like a back door for that very manipulation. But this is where it gets even crazier where we've talked about many times, using Wi-Fi to map what's around it. That's been available for a long time. And everyone's got one of those right in their living room, hopefully not, but in their house.

Starting point is 00:50:16 And think about that with the context of what's happening everywhere, guys. How about can we go from Wi-Fi radio signals, you know, sort of like the Wi-Fi routers in your house, they're bouncing off radio signals that work sort of like sonar. Can you go from that to where human beings are to images? So what they did is they had, you know, a camera looking at a space with people in it. That's sort of like coming in from one eye. The other eye is the radio signals, sonar from the Wi-Fi router. and they just learned to predict, like, this is where the human beings are.

Starting point is 00:50:48 Then they took away the camera. So all the AI had was the language of radio signals bouncing around a room, and this is what they're able to reconstruct. Real-time, 3D pose estimation, right? So suddenly, AI has turned every Wi-Fi router into a camera that can work in the dark, specially tuned for tracking living beings. Now, take that to a whole other level as well. Like when you get into audio, like reverberation.

Starting point is 00:51:17 Like these are, these are all, these things, the way they've built this setup is just a massive surveillance absorbing tool. Just absorbing data nonstop. Now, the problem before all this, like, you know, 9-11 discussion was that they weren't able to parse through it or whatever the correct word would be. Like they couldn't look at it fast enough to be able to get, you know, it was sort of retro, at least as we were told. You know, they look back and you could find, know what you're looking for. oh, it was in there, but ultimately weren't able to actually break it all down. Well, today with the AI dynamic, it's different, the argument anyway, that now these things are being real-time assessed and it's dystopian.

Starting point is 00:51:54 So thinking about that, using this to spy on all of us, let's talk about two actual main things, but in this case, we just discussed the next level tech, which we were just highlighting, and calling you a terrorist for calling out the problem, not just resisting data centers, which is a huge part of that, saying that flock shouldn't exist. As we've already seen, he's calling you a terrorist for caring about that. Despite, and let's see, remember, even flock has a guy tied directly to his early intelligence has been there for years. I find that to be a problem.

Starting point is 00:52:24 You may not. I think it matters with what they're publicly doing in the world and what the Israeli government says. We're talking about intelligence. That's the government, guys. But according to the CEO of flock safety, we are all terrorists. This isn't new. We've already covered this.

Starting point is 00:52:37 Labeling calls to reveal camera locations as terroristic. He called Deflock a terrorist organization. I mean, that's quite alarming, especially since it's not a crime and not unconstitutional. What they're doing is both of those things. The Antichrist chef says, or the anarchist chef, excuse me, says, open air and free range prisons for all. Now, this is more of a projection into the future as I read it. Sean says, effective immediately. Now, think about this as it uncomfortably connects with the COVID-19 time frame.

Starting point is 00:53:11 effective immediately. Stay at home. Order is in place, signed by executive order of the president. Any travel will be illegal for the next 15 days. Now, you fill in the blank, why? New pathogen, new Iran terror cells, you know, whatever. Democrats, you know, whatever the narrative becomes. Trendaerog will march into the streets.

Starting point is 00:53:30 Okay. Shut down. Any travel will be illegal for 15 days. Our partner flock safety will help us keep people safe by automatically reporting any violators to local law enforcement. This is what the future looks like under big data and flock. Let me think about that. Think about COVID-19 with these things on every door, every corner, every park, every beach, which is what they're doing. That's what they're building, guys.

Starting point is 00:53:53 And I don't know why some people choose not to see that. I believe most of them do. But here is a clip that shows you the evolution of this from 2024 to today. Rapidly for Biden's administration? You can't miss that, guys. This is how it always goes. Why people like us are, you know, sadly, I don't like being right about the insane collaboration of, you know, but it continues to be the case.

Starting point is 00:54:38 People who are arguing from a nonpartisan perspective are routinely shown to be correct. Now here's flock, flock safety. Why do critics claim otherwise? The question is, does flock share information data with ice? No, flock does not, okay? Well, it says why do they say otherwise? Well, flock does have established federal customers, including national parks, veterans affairs, hospitals, and military bases.

Starting point is 00:55:04 Well, that's not even the full list, by the way. But so the U.S. government is what you should take from that. These organizations can establish one-to-one sharing relationship with any other legal law enforcement. Got it. So you create a loophole, just like everything else you seem to be doing. The loophole is, well, the government works with us.

Starting point is 00:55:21 The government has access to that. We don't give access to ICE, but the government can give them access to the same thing. Cool. And it says, any other legal law enforcement agency on Flox 80 platform, where applicable laws allow it, yeah, because clearly they care about the laws, and only when communities explicitly allow federal data access.

Starting point is 00:55:39 Well, that's just flatly not true. We've seen endless examples of that. their own local government saying they don't even apply, or they don't abide by what they agree to, or they alter the contract act, you know, after the fact. This is from 2025 May. May. ICE taps into nationwide AI enabled camera network data shows.

Starting point is 00:56:01 Yeah, so they're lying, by the way, in case you didn't catch that already. And it was obvious, this is just a, not even a loophole. I mean, let's be real. ICE has been given access to this. I mean, like, look, this is how I would look at it. This administration, Trump in particular, is a kind of person who would go, yeah, like, let's make this agree, make it look like we're not involved. Like instead of just continuing to make it look like you're accessing it through somebody else, they just give ICE access.

Starting point is 00:56:24 And Flock has to maintain the lie. That's my opinion. But whatever it is, guys, they're accessing the information, which what we just showed you already makes that clear. Because it's obvious this government doesn't care about your rights. Any of them left or right. Here's an article from Electric Frontier Foundation. Are your local police using flock safety license plate readers to scan for immigrants? Or really just fill in the blank to scan for whatever they decide to scan for, which is the point.

Starting point is 00:56:53 Buried in the flock safety administrative interface. There is a drop-down menu where agencies select which NCIC topics to subscribe to, meaning different, you know, focal points of surveillance. And it says if immigration violator, which is one of those categories, is selected, the local agency will receive an alert that a vehicle ICE is looking for has been cited. According to Flok Safety, ICE itself does not get an alert. Although the local agency, you know, the group they're working with may contact ICE to let them know or literally be standing there with them and going, there it is right there go.

Starting point is 00:57:30 We're talking about police, guys. We're talking about local law enforcement. We're talking about any number of other groups that actively work alongside them. And it says many agencies also participate in collaboration or collaborate with immigration enforcement. You don't see what a lazy loophole that is. I mean, it's not even, you're just openly, it's one step removed.

Starting point is 00:57:48 I mean, that's like saying that, well, the vice president's not allowed, but Trump can access it. Well, gee, I wonder if Trump will let him look through, you know, it's just an obvious, obvious sidestep. This is how dumb they think we are and how dishonest they are. Now, here's an interesting, funny point.

Starting point is 00:58:02 So this is important to highlight. This is the kind of thing that I'm seeing more and more and more from any number of these, but in particular on this platform. So asking this, does ICE have access to flock cameras? And it says, no, ice does not have access. Again, the point is, I already know that they do, and I thought I was curious what Grock is going to say.

Starting point is 00:58:20 And I said, no. When you can read through it, and I simply said, well, so the, it basically says, though, when you go through it, the sidesteps, so there's no, ICE does not have direct access. And so basically direct, right? So I said, so the answer is yes. And this is not exactly. It's yes indirectly, but no to direct access.

Starting point is 00:58:37 I said, so show me where I wrote direct anywhere, right? So the point is, this is how this platform just inserts its own metrics to be able to answer a way that the system is programmed to answer. Nope, that's not what's happening. Well, I didn't write direct, did I? I just said access. And it says, you're right, you didn't write direct anywhere. I said, yet you inserted it in order to say no, even though the answer is clearly yes. Yes, correct. That's, I introduced the direct qualifier, and I shouldn't have framed it with the initial answer around when your question didn't specify that. Yes, ICE does have access to flock data. Now, think about how stupid that is. Think how it takes three, four prompts to get it to answer. This is why you cannot rely on these things in any sense

Starting point is 00:59:21 for accurate information. It's a tool if you choose to use it. Frankly, every day it seems to be more and more manipulative, so I just think that's important to highlight that we know this. And even it does. But it answers with no. And you know how many people take that and move on without even looking further. That's what they want from you guys. Wired, 2024. Ice signs $2 billion contract with spyware maker Paragon Solutions. The NSAO group, the Israeli intelligence criminal enterprise. And Donald Trump, actually grabbed that. I forgot that one. What was it? I think of this one. Yeah. Spyware maker NSO group is paving the path back at Trump's America. Donald Trump literally making having signed contracts

Starting point is 01:00:13 with a group that has been caught breaking the law all around the world through Israeli intelligence. It's not even a secret. It's one of the most widely acknowledged spyware makers, the companies that had been caught spying on presidents and journalists and Trump made a contract with them.

Starting point is 01:00:27 As if we don't need any more obviousness in all of this. But so the point in this, first of all, is ICE is working with groups like Palantir, like Israeli intelligence, like NSA group in Paragon Solutions and Sell Bright and Clearview AI and all the things we're talking about.

Starting point is 01:00:40 And so just making it, one more thing is the flock camera connection. It's all interconnected, is the point here. And this one as well, we just showed you, and this is wired. ICE is using Palantir's AI tools to sort through tips. As I just said, same point, just they're all interconnected. This was on the 2025 August. I used to use immigration OS by Palantir, new AI system to track immigrant movements or,

Starting point is 01:01:01 you know, whatever they use it for next. It's about justifying its use through people who don't understand how that works. Now, ICE, as I'm demonstrated, is absolutely using all of this. So what I want to highlight in this next part is just a few examples that this never stopped. I mean, I don't,

Starting point is 01:01:20 this is an article we put out, oh, wait, did I... Oh, it's on Twitter, it's right here. ICE has already been caught lying in court about claims of being run over, being shot at numerous times. And I mean, literally proven in court to be caught lying,

Starting point is 01:01:36 and so the U.S. government retracts its claims, pulls back to suit, and they just try to be quiet about it. over and over and over. And you know what happens? Maybe these people get slightly penalized. Usually they get quietly moved somewhere else, which has been happening forever.

Starting point is 01:01:48 Police, Catholic Church, you know, same deal. It's going to shuttle away somewhere else. This is what they do. My point, though, is that this administration is bet they're, they want this from them. They praise this from them. So they keep doing it. They keep lying.

Starting point is 01:02:02 They keep getting people who are unjustly arrested or whatever the circumstance is. And then because they embarrass them, because they get away, whatever it is, they make up a story. about how they shot at them. They hit me with a shovel. They shot, you know, and it's all lie. I mean, in the examples I'm showing you, they're lying.

Starting point is 01:02:18 Consistently lying about these things. And then we just keep moving forward. So the point is, this is what's coming to you next. This is the new enforcement arm. It's using the same kind of technology. It's using the same flock cameras. It's being tied in with Israeli intelligence. It's all the same conversation.

Starting point is 01:02:33 So in this case, another one, this is July 9th. The ice story around the man, it shot, is unraveling rapidly. Now, this is a local media from KHOU, 11. ICE claims that this person drove into one of their SUVs with the van and tried to run over an agent. There were no marks on their van. No surveillance footage shows them doing that. And as more of it comes out in this clip, as you can watch for yourself, it proves they lied. Over and over, the ice story around it unravels rapidly with no evidence that he rammed anyone with video showing ICE actually ramming his vehicle.

Starting point is 01:03:06 Making matters worse, ICE had no body cameras. Oops, despite having gotten $29.9 billion in 2025 that they could have used them. Guys, this is a choice because there's no accountability. It's rampant lawlessness. This administration wants that from them. And really, I think the government. But as I said, this goes back to pretty and good. They've been caught relentlessly being shown lying about horrible things.

Starting point is 01:03:30 And I mean like a group of five ICE members who were all there and they all lie to a man about the entire story. and then it turns out they all lied and barely anything happens, let alone in a large review of how this continues to be a problem. Now, here is Christy Noam, who no longer is in the position, who lied right to your face about a Minneapolis terrorist woman attack. They lied about all of these conversations, guys. Here's another example. I'll play this one for you.

Starting point is 01:03:57 ISIS's latest lie about these operations led this person to a case where agents profiled and arrested him, and guess what, guys, he's a U.S. citizen. Not new. I mean, it's happened more times than you. you'll probably even understand. Most people, like even our audience, would probably be shocked to find out how many U.S. citizens are consistently detained,

Starting point is 01:04:14 arrested, beat up by ICE because they have a certain look to them. And realize, as we've already proven, they get benefits whether or not there's a charge. Whether or not they have to cut them loose right after they arrest them, ICE members are still benefiting from that. And that's why they're driving the arrest number.

Starting point is 01:04:30 So Stephen Miller can scream about how many arrests they had that day, even though they're lying to you and he knows it. Hell on Hell Ponce says ICE agents approached him on his way to work. This happened on Wednesday. He says he told him his name, showed them a valid identification, and repeatedly explained that he was born right here in Texas with no criminal record. Nonetheless, ICE agents took Mr. Ponce into custody and questioned him for more than two hours. Now, what do you think?

Starting point is 01:05:00 I haven't been able to find out whether I'm sure this will flush out more. what we've already been seeing is stuff that AI has played a factor. He showed him his ID, guys. He literally said, I'm a U.S. citizen. Here's my driver's license. What are we talking about? And they arrested him anyway, saying he had a deportation order, guys. Do you think it was an AI flock camera or something else that said, we got the match?

Starting point is 01:05:23 That keeps happening right now. Or do they just not care? I mean, no matter how you spend this, we're talking about American citizens, not like it should matter anymore than anybody else's rights, guys. But at the end of the day, you have American citizens in the United States who are being accosted by law enforcement, militarized law enforcement in the middle of the day. There's nothing sacred to these people. There's no, he can prove he's a U.S. citizen, and they arrest him based on their arbitrary narratives anyway. And they detain him, and they hold him.

Starting point is 01:05:52 If you care about any of these things, if you care about anything Republicans pretend to care about, or just constitutional rights or anything, then you need to call this out and realize that you are not supporting, I mean, None of the government supports your rights. And it's time we really acknowledge that. I was born in College Station, Texas. Like, there's no way like there's what's going on. And they said, no, no, no, we're going to do our investigation. Pretty much felt kidnapped. You know, they just put me in there, said, I have a deportation order, put me in handcuffs,

Starting point is 01:06:23 and took me to another location. Now, a spokesperson for ICE tells us agents, we're looking for a wanted violent criminal. Always, as if that justifies. the illegal actions and unconstitutional detentions in the area but admit that mr ponsay was quote temporarily taken into custody by mistake god the agency adds that they apologized to mr ponsay and took him home but mr ponsay says none of that actually happened oh so they didn't apologize they didn't take him home oh they lied i'm shocked the the regardless of the all the lies would just show you they're a bunch of children with too much power we're talking about the

Starting point is 01:07:03 that you accosted a U.S. citizen who proved who he was with his identification and you arrested him anyway, probably just to say, you know what, we can do that because they think that, because clearly they can right now. Doesn't that bother anybody? It should. You could be next. They don't need justification anymore. This is just, we'll round you up because we decide to. This is everything Trump said he was fighting, everything Biden said he was fighting, everything this government and pretend that it's not. Aaron Melnick says, remember last week it came out in court

Starting point is 01:07:33 that ICE outright invented a fake murder attempt on one of their officers and tried to send a man to prison for decades on claims that he choked an agent even though they were the ones who actually put the guy in a chokehold

Starting point is 01:07:46 and that literally got proven in court? Oh yeah, that story. Well, here's another example. You know, I mean, it just doesn't stop. How is this even continuing? It's like every other conversation. How is the genocide still happening? Everyone can see it.

Starting point is 01:07:59 We all know this is unjustified. People are either honest or not. Jesus freaking Congress continues to cover these. Ice agents were caught on video entering a U.S. citizens' home without a warrant. This is covered by the local media. Warrantless arrest inside a Salt Lake home. This is not new, guys.

Starting point is 01:08:17 Do I have to reiterate how many times Donald Trump has said we might arrest U.S. citizens, we might deport U.S. citizens if they bop a grandma on the head or whatever nonsense he's spinning? there's no legal reality there, guys, but here we are arresting U.S. citizens, breaking into their homes and no warrant for no reason, under the guise that they're somehow deportable, tackling the father to the ground in their own home with no warrant, while pinning down his 15-year-old grandson. As a family, as the family repeatedly told agents they were U.S. citizens and demanded to see a warrant, the agents ignored them. The daughter, just have it the warrant point alone. At what point did we just stop caring about warrants? Well, they tried to make the argument. They didn't need it. them as ice. And so they just go forward as if that's the truth. It's not the truth, guys.

Starting point is 01:09:03 If that's the truth, then you don't have any rights in your home if the ice decides to go to your front door. It's not true. But Trump argues that and they just go forward. The daughter began recording and repeatedly asked to see a warrant, but they refused. Refused. She also told agents her daughter is diabetic and a teenager they were restraining was only 15 years old. The agents continued to arrest both U.S. citizens from their home without a warrant, eventually releasing the child but taking the father. The Fourth Amendment, I mean, even that, let's even say the father was the crime. What about the children?

Starting point is 01:09:32 What about anybody else's rights? There's not just this no-holds-barred ability for them to go after anybody they assume might be what they're looking for. The Fourth Amendment prohibits government agents from entering a home without a judicial warrant. They tried to do that different warrant, but that legally doesn't apply. Either way, they don't have the right to do this. Because even that one they were trying to use only applied to is if someone they were going for ended up going into somebody else's home, but even that doesn't apply. It has to be

Starting point is 01:10:00 their home. And they just, they just manipulate this. You have a right in your home, no matter who you have in that house, to have them, your constitutional rights are unalienable. They don't get to go into your house without having a judicial warrant from a judge. But they do and they don't care. The federal agents can force their way into U.S. home, ignore repeated demands to produce a warrant and use force without lawful authority. They aren't just violating one family's rights. they're undermining one of the core constitutional principles of American that America was founded on. A free country depends on the government being bound by the Constitution. If those limits can be ignored, what consequences?

Starting point is 01:10:36 Without consequences, we are no longer a free country. Well, that's long since been the reality, guys. But understand these people are only demonstrating very brazenly that they've never cared about these things. And she also points out, oh, here's another example of an ICE agent just randomly pushing a kid to the ground because he's filming, got in his face. That's a child. Move back. Like you're in a public location, you're not allowed to film them?

Starting point is 01:11:01 That's how they're pretending. That's how they're acting. These are criminals. These are the pirates out there, as they accuse everybody else of being what they are doing. They, oh, here's this. Actually, just for time in general,

Starting point is 01:11:14 but I'll play a little bit real quick. Oh, actually, no, I think I didn't get that one. I'm going to grab the wrong one. In any case, the point is the same. I mean, I really hope you will go check all of these out and realize how, broken this is. Carthick says they interviewed all three witnesses

Starting point is 01:11:32 separately, and they all said the same thing. Washington Post covered this. The only reason I'm including these guys just in passing is because these are, a dime a dozen. Happens every day. And these stories are verified through other videos, court documentation, where they get forced to dismiss the case. It's not hyperbolic.

Starting point is 01:11:48 It's not assumptive. They did not ram the car, ICE agents fired at them, and then mocked Mr. Salgado as he lay there dying. That's the person they shot and then just took off. But now we find out they lied about the whole thing and then murder a man in the street and just took off and nothing's probably going to happen like Renee Good, like Prady, like the rest of them, because these people hate you. I mean, how else do we describe this? These are the ones with America

Starting point is 01:12:13 first as they're murdering Americans in the street using Israeli intelligence spyware. Maybe we should reflect on this. Here's the example of the video just playing. And this is actually the same cop, by the way, in the same circumstance that one you just saw that she pinned below. And here's the same cops. So they're arresting somebody who, by the way, it's up in the air in regard to this person. As he's already being held, they slam his head into the rock. But the point is about the people who are filming.

Starting point is 01:12:39 I don't care what you want to call them. I don't care what kind of Republican childish nonsense you want to throw about anybody filming an ISIS somehow on Tifa stopping a child. It's certainly possible, but realize regardless of what you call them, they have a right to do it. They have a right as Americans to film whatever side they're on, whatever's happening. That's the legal right upheld by the courts.

Starting point is 01:12:58 roundly. So when they're filming these people who are routinely breaking the law, gee, I wonder why we should film them. They get violent. They get angry. Why? Because they're routinely breaking the law. It's not hard to understand. My point is, they're filming people, they're doing what they're supposed to be doing. No matter how irritating you may think that is, no matter what you think of their political opinions as you assume what they may be, these people have a right to do this. Sir, what is your name? By the way, he has a legal right to ask that. He has a legal responsibility to tell you his name, which they never do. What they need.

Starting point is 01:13:34 never provide information, which is a crime, has been for a long time, which is mask up because he knows he's being watched. Look what he does. Because they know. Because they feel threatened. You know why? Because they are a threat. because what they're doing is a threat to everybody.

Starting point is 01:14:09 Every American that watches this knows what they're doing is unjustified. What they're doing, of course, if you're watching what they're doing to people, hopefully you care about that and don't just go, oh, well, a brown person, we shouldn't care. The reality is they feel threatened because what they're doing is threatening. What they're doing is unjustified. What they're doing is unconstitutional. But how many times do we see people doing anything other than filming? I'm sure it's out there.

Starting point is 01:14:29 If they do something, well, you can arrest them for it. What they're doing is attacking you for filming because of whatever narrative they spin. And they have been going after people. They have been trailing people. They have been surveilling people. They have gone after people just for filming and arrested them on unjust causes. And they were released. This is all essentially tortures the wrong word.

Starting point is 01:14:48 But what's the better word? They're doing it to be punitive. They're violating your rights. They're breaking U.S. law because they can. It shouldn't be much more confusing than that, guys. I mean, or most more, it shouldn't be, it can't get any more clear. I put it that way. These people are not on the side of American rights.

Starting point is 01:15:05 I don't know how that could be America first. Now, play this a little bit ago. Jason Bassler, anyone ever see Elon Musk say a word about flock cameras? Pro against condemnation? Anything? Funny how he's out there screaming about any number of things in similar conversations elsewhere. The guy's a hypocrite, guys. No, Elon is helping build the person around us.

Starting point is 01:15:30 That's what he's doing. Here is a example of an American citizen. citizens speaking to their local government and asking direct questions about whether they have some kind of NDA or contract with a data center. You might not be surprised to hear how they respond. You personally signed any NDA, any agreement, or had any private communication, such as meetings, phone calls, text messages, or emails with any developer, company, landowner, or representative regarding any current or potential project that could affect Tyrone Township. Chris Robata

Starting point is 01:16:07 No Dean No Jennifer I'm not answering your question This is not the time of place I can ask you whatever I want Don't tell me what I can say

Starting point is 01:16:19 But we don't have to answer you But you're communicating with me Jennifer I didn't think you were supposed to do that Right so she's I mean Specifically I'm not answering that question So she can make up whatever excuse she wants

Starting point is 01:16:33 She's not the only one by the way How is that even possible like they're supposed to be accountable to you. Oh, that's right. That's the naive lie we still tell ourselves. The living embodiment of our will. Guys, are we really pretending that? These people don't care about what you think.

Starting point is 01:16:48 They use the illusion of the consent of the government to get power. And then they disregard whatever you asked for. It's been that way my entire life. Great Carnes. How about you? Yes or no. Not the place. We've already discussed this.

Starting point is 01:17:05 Who's always? already discussed it. I'm sorry. Who's already discussed it? Who has? Who's disgusted? I've not discussed this with you. What are you saying? Pan Moffler? Yes or no? Yep. I said you work for us. Herman Ferguson? Won't answer. Zach Tucker. Mike, stop. You see, you'll see you one more time. Look, guys, you have to understand how simple this is. I mean, I'm not going to pretend because they don't answer. that we know they do. But why is that complicated? I don't have any I don't have any obvious conflicts of interest with things that we're building. That should be an easy answer. But you can't argue because they don't that you know for sure. That's just

Starting point is 01:18:04 being objective. But I mean, it clearly opens a door why those first two immediately say no. I get the sense there's some kind of division happening here where they know these people have conflicts of interest with local data centers and she's calling them out for it. I mean, this is not unique. It's in every place this is happening. The local government governments are profiting from what's happening at the expense of their own people. You're up. Won't answer. Zach Tucker.

Starting point is 01:18:34 Mike, stop. You say guilty one more time. You're up. Oh, so now we can't speak? Guy in the audience is guilty. You can't, you better not. We're going to abuse our power even further. Power drunk on their own power, clearly.

Starting point is 01:18:50 I'm not coloring. Stop the clock, please. While Greg's talking, I'd like my time back. I don't need the comment in the background. I need my time back and quit interrupting me. Zach Tucker, but she answered at the planning commission. But you've decided not to answer now. Well, at least you're not looking as angry at me this time.

Starting point is 01:19:12 I guess you're checking yourself. You see, you know, it's funny. I mean, it's not even secret, guys. These people don't, like, if we're to believe the argument, that's supposed to be how this is supposed to work. They should be, like, reverent. We care what you think because we're doing what you want from us, right? That's not what happens.

Starting point is 01:19:32 These people hate her for that. And I guarantee, if there wasn't some, there wouldn't be animosity if she was just, if they were just complying because that's, I mean, it shouldn't be some kind of a weird issue. That's what they're supposed to be doing. Your job is to act in the,

Starting point is 01:19:46 without the will of the people of your county. That's just not the reality. So what she's highlighting is they have contracts and influence and conflicts of interest with groups that are building things, the people of that county do not want. And as we just showed you before, that people can stand up and vote against things, they can, don't happen anyway.

Starting point is 01:20:04 Like Cleveland, right? Float cameras. Well, no, we're just going to remove the vote because we don't. So everyone can vote against, including people in the government and they don't care. We are in a very dangerous time. As Max says, how the F is it even remotely legal for a politician to sign an NDA

Starting point is 01:20:19 with a corporation to hide information from the constituents because we don't live in the world we think we do. It's not legal. That's the point, though. So arrest them. Somebody. Get him. Arrest them.

Starting point is 01:20:30 Oh, no one cares? That's the problem right there, guys. The power, the enforcement arm doesn't care. Maybe we can change that. Deadly bacteria found in major U.S. city wastewater system tied to Mark Zuckerberg's data center. Just an interesting side note. You have an overlap.

Starting point is 01:20:46 It's just one of an endless amount of problems these things create for the local communities. Just one example. I mean, it's happening everywhere, whether it's resource abuse, pollution, bacteria, wake up. Now, a connected point to this

Starting point is 01:21:03 in the EU, you might have seen this going around, July 9th, Parliament, Green Lights, chat control, 101. Today, the European Parliament

Starting point is 01:21:11 allowed the suspicionless mass scanning of private communications to pass. Suspicion, you don't need a justification. We're just going to mass scan

Starting point is 01:21:23 everyone's communications. Like, they're not even, they're just taking the mask off, guys. Although a majority of voting members of the European Parliament actually opposed the regulation. Opposed it. 314 against 276 in favor. Despite that, the motion to reject it failed to secure the required absolute majority. So it passed anyway.

Starting point is 01:21:49 What? I mean, how does that even make sense? So who cares what they vote? This is why the EU is an illusion. I mean, they don't even in charge of their countries, guys. The EU, it's like over a bureaucratic overlord, even over people to get supposedly elected to these countries. The end of the day, this is insane.

Starting point is 01:22:08 This shows you there's a marching order that's larger than any country, any union that is moving forward regardless of what even the people in power are doing. I just hope we can start to reflect on what this is showing us. There's a much larger thing happening here. We are living through a greater. transition. This is the great reset. It never stopped. Left and right. Global discussion is happening right in front of us. And there are other people making these points. I just hope again, we can do something right now before it becomes too late.

Starting point is 01:22:36 And you get these fake patriots all over the place like Mike Lee here coming out and saying, I mean, even value taming. I can't laugh at that name enough. Posting this. Saying, just in, all new cars in the EU are now required to include infrared cameras that monitor the driver's eyes and face for distraction. Yeah, totally. It's terrible. It's insane. But guess what? It's been happening in the U.S. for a long time. So as they hype and scream and point somewhere else, there's a reason they're doing that. Mike Lee says, nope, not here, not in America. And either he's that stupid or he's that dishonest or both, you can decide. That's what we are. Just a bunch of fake patriots trying to gaslight you into the control grid while stuffing their pockets.

Starting point is 01:23:17 Call them out, guys. As the even Twitter fact check says, well, section 242. of the 2021 infrastructure investment and jobs act mandates, all new passenger vehicles in the U.S. be equipped with technology to monitor their performance and impairment. I just talked about this with the rental car I dealt with. But my point about this is these people are grifting and lying and fronting gaslighting. They want you to think they're the ones fighting it and calling other ones. It's like Elon Musk, screening about what EU is doing for the online child act.

Starting point is 01:23:46 It's the same stuff happening here. They just are deflecting. They don't want you to see what's happening. on just the connection to Israel, the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation, the group right now that is, rather the Board of Peace that Robert was just talking about, the larger kind of new world order transition point.

Starting point is 01:24:07 They, you, don't forget, actually I'll grab that article, see which everyone pops up. Yeah. Oh, no, this also grab this one. This is Heretz, writing about what Netanyahu said when speaking about the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation, which is a disgusting joke, of a term.

Starting point is 01:24:25 What's wrong with that? How Israel trained and armed ISIS-linked Gaza militia. So these are, and these weren't people, the groups from Gaza largely, the people that they were, you know, brought in from other locations. The point is that these are ISIS elements that the Israeli governments working with, and they were the foundation for the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation. And were used to feed the Gaza population? No, not at all what happened.

Starting point is 01:24:48 That was the illusion, as Mel highlights right here, the food drops were one of the most sadistic events in recent history. Now, we remember they were just executed people. That's what that Green Beret veteran came back and told everybody. Major story, barely got any attention, at least not in the right ways. Israel imposed a total blockade for almost two months last spring, trying to exhaust food storage, deliberately starving all these people, then set up these food distribution centers without enough food for everyone with the goal of luring Hamas, or what, I argue just Palestinians in groups, into the open since they would presumably be faster and more capable of securing food boxes.

Starting point is 01:25:23 Their narrative, anyway. Then they use facial recognition cameras on the cranes around the sites to identify potential matches and gun them down in the chaos. According to new reports. I mean, because this is the whole point. So so many parallels to this. What they're doing right now everywhere. There's AI surveillance kit.

Starting point is 01:25:44 We could talk about these 972 articles of Lavender and Hobsora. They're AI Palantir murder systems that are happening still in Gaza or how this is being set up. all across the United States or elsewhere in the world. They use this under the guides of feeding people to literally kill people that they got the right record. Of course, let's assume they even got the right AI data. It's not wrong, right?

Starting point is 01:26:05 Or that they even care. Or they're using as an excuse, just mow down Palestinians. It's all, we still, and it kills me when we can prove stuff like this and it seems to do nothing. I don't care whether you think they're Hamas or not, that you're using the starvation of the people you created and otherwise lied about to then go after people you claim her. Moss. It's just, it's so, there's no parallel, guys. These people are pure evil. And they're working

Starting point is 01:26:30 with the very people they claim they're trying to fight around the world because that's what's always going on. One quick other parallel to this. I didn't even, I didn't even heard much about this. There's a parallel kind of Google Maps dynamic that's been being used and being sort of sold to people as the, you know, the alternative to the surveillance Google dynamic. Well, guys, be on guard for this because it is everywhere right now. We're like, this is what I think the whole network state agenda is all about. Getting ahead of the people who are seeing the collapse. They're recognizing that we don't want what they're selling anymore. And so they're getting, what's the logical alternative? We want more freedom. We want a, you know, libertarian base or

Starting point is 01:27:08 whatever people would call for, right? Some kind of idea where the government's not what's ruling our lives. Well, they know we want that. We've wanted it for a long time. So I think the network state agendas, the perceived, you know, the solution they've created to roll us into. Even though it's not libertarian, even though it's not about freedom, it's a trap. My point, though, is that I see that in so many factors like this, where you have this new, you know, freedom-minded, not Google, well, guess what? Turns out it's controlled by Israel. And this is actually insane to me.

Starting point is 01:27:37 So this is directly from their own, this is from Google, the, Google.com, this is our terms of service, terms of use, ways. com. Down here, and this is what has caught everyone's attention. governing law and jurisdiction. Now, there's one, there's, this is somewhat normal

Starting point is 01:27:55 for places that operate, you know, where they have basically these are the laws that guide what we do. What's crazy about this is this is used anywhere. It's online, right?

Starting point is 01:28:05 And so usually things like that that are not, it's, it's a map system that applies everywhere. It shouldn't be unique. The bottom line, it says governing law,

Starting point is 01:28:13 it says these terms will be governed solely by the laws of the state of Israel without giving effect to any conflicts of law principles. Now, we've talked about this so many times the idea of what they openly discuss as the Israeli government in numerous contexts. This has to, has to do with the West Bank, where they've openly and routinely argued that they can do whatever they want. The title is

Starting point is 01:28:38 justifying land grab, Israel says it's allowed to ignore international law anywhere it wants. And as it says, although the Knesset, this is direct, and this comes directly from their own legislation that you can read for yourself. Although the Knesset can legislate any place in the world. That's the starting part of that. Oh, they can, can they? The Israeli government can legislate anywhere at once? Yes, they routinely stress that.

Starting point is 01:29:04 Although it is entitled, it says, entitled to violate the sovereignty of foreign countries through legislation. They believe that, guys. You know why? Because your government lets them do that. That would be applied to, to, applied to events occurring in their territories. Although it is within the authority of the government of Israel to annex any territory. any territory. Well, what actions have told them they can't do that? Look around. Lebanon, Syria, Gaza. That's what the U.S. government allows. Although the Knesset may ignore directives of international

Starting point is 01:29:33 law in any area it pleases, the word this goes is, so why can't we take West Bank if we can do all those things? And they all continue to push this. So going back to the idea, I find this to be alarming. They're basically just saying, look, we supersede everything. And that's not a secret. That is the supremacist mindset of the Zionist's Israeli government that very much overlaps with the Jewish supremacist mindset of many of the Zionists. There is a very clear overlap, but it is not only Judaism that is a part of this. And there's plenty of Zionists who aren't Jews. There's plenty of Zionists who are Christians. There's plenty of people in the Israeli government or rather Israeli country who are Orthodox Jews and otherwise who don't believe in Zionism. Always going

Starting point is 01:30:14 to point that out. But the point is that this is a clear connection to that extremist ideology. But overall, you're talking about something else that connects back to an Israeli intelligence technology. You know, in my opinion, anything right now that's tapped into by these groups is spying on you. And we wish, it's just an even only about Israel. I would say the same thing about the U.S. government, by the way. And historically, I would be right. But what Israel is doing is far more alarming to me right now in a larger sense. So that's worth considering in the surveillance tech side of things that this is being discovered.

Starting point is 01:30:46 Here's a clip if you wanted to watch more about it. Also, just to casually include this article from 19, 2010, entitled Netanyahu, America is a thing you can move very easily. How many times we've covered this or the clips of Netanyahu being speaking with his family going, oh, we can easily manipulate the left and right, you know, against each other and control the United States. Who cares though, right? Because it's not like everyone knows that, and our government doesn't care that we know it.

Starting point is 01:31:11 So let's just pretend it's not there. The truth is, guys, this is relevant today. The what the Israeli government is doing shows you they truly believe that. very easy to manipulate the U.S. government. They believe that. So speaking of that, this is something I want to think about. This is just a note for myself that I want to get into the conversation about Charlie Kirk really quickly, not in depth for many reasons because of what I wrote here.

Starting point is 01:31:33 And so this is just my thought on this. Just a general thing. And what I truly think is what's the best way to put this? I guess the current, I think right now we're dealing with a kind of new form of obfuscation. is probably the best way to put it. No, I mean, who's to say even new, but ultimately something that I think is repetitively happening. You tell me what you think.

Starting point is 01:31:57 What I think we're dealing with right now, and it ties into what I think, is that ultimately people are, for whatever reason, waking up to some kind of, the larger manipulations that we are bound by, two-party illusion, government, are challenging these classic ideas. And so I think that's why we're being sort of guided

Starting point is 01:32:15 into some new form of governance and new world order, whatever we're talking about. But so my point is that as we awaken to these things, we're more skeptical and we're calling stuff out. And so what I keep seeing is an interesting deviation from what I've always been used to, which is essentially that we get, like, let's take Charlie Kirk, Hal Robinson, or any number of examples that we've seen, Butler, or any number of things. They lie right to our faces.

Starting point is 01:32:38 That's step one, right? They come out and they just bombastically lie, give you conflicting information. And this is all hypothetical. Who's to say if it's by design? Maybe they're just incompetent. But in this thread I'm laying out, it's kind of just a high, hypothetical as if this is by design. Or they lie to you in ways that are meant to be seen.

Starting point is 01:32:54 Like clumsy, inconsistent, cash says one thing, Trump says another, you know, whatever it is. Just lie, lie, lie, but they stand by it. And then in the midst of that moment, there's just screaming partisan back and forth and confusing. And most people just kind of let it go. Now, they know that we see it. Right? That's the point. They know that we see that it's a lie.

Starting point is 01:33:14 They see the conversation. We're questioning this. We're calling out, why was this left here? the extra bullet over here. Why did nobody clean this up? Just insane stuff that everyone can see. They want us to do that. That's what I believe. They want us to get pulled into this conversation, to get invested in it, and then go, why is nothing happening? Like, in a way, it makes you feel in a way you are helpless, ineffectual, because nobody's doing anything. They don't care what you think, and we're screaming about it. Nothing changes. Then after, like, the artificial debate that

Starting point is 01:33:44 carries on, mired in just like nonstop, partisan screaming and non-stop. Partisan screaming and non- nonsense. So it becomes just kind of like overwhelmingly stupid for many, like because you have to weed through all of that to get to what might be the truth. Right. So they lie to us. They want us to get engaged with it. They see it. They want us to have this debate, right? Then after a gap, they start to feed you the truth. Right. So now we go, oh, well, look, like, you know, whether it's just in like the Charlie Kirk point of it, whether it's Candace Owens or anybody else going, look at this and look at this information or the case or the trial going on. Well, wait a minute. And that he didn't even actually confess?

Starting point is 01:34:21 Like, all of these things which are confirming our concerns are being dripped out. Now, here's where we're kind of in the flux of this point, but historically take any one of these previous events. They drip out the information, Lahaina, East Palestine, whatever. And nothing happens, right? Then in that moment, it gets buried in more partisan screaming. And nothing ever happens. So my point in saying all that is that we keep going through this,

Starting point is 01:34:49 cycle. And it's almost as if what they've created is this moment where if we feel vindicated after that weird kind of cycle of screaming by drip the truth, the truth, truth dripping out, we go, well, we were right. We knew it. They lied and they're corrupt. And it's over somehow. And they walk away, Scott Free. No one gets held accountable. No one gets arrested. And it may, maybe, maybe there's a fine or somebody gets thrown in jail briefly, but nothing really changes. And I feel like there's a cycle to this. So keeping that in mind. this possible idea. And I'll include the show we did, one of the few we did around the Charlie Kirk

Starting point is 01:35:25 conversation. This was right when it happened on September 12th. Just was there as real involved with the Charlie Kirk death? And I absolutely believe that. Let's look at the facts. Also include Carrie's article, which I think is more relevant now where this goes, the Charlie Kirk hysteria is a blueprint for future political chaos. I think we're seeing that come up right now kind of in the same point that was just making.

Starting point is 01:35:47 But keeping what I said in mind, this is from the ninth, accused Charlie Kirk assassin allegedly confessed in texts, apologize and describe motive, agents testify. It's a weird title and it's almost like it's trying to like make sense of things people are questioning. But just to quickly go through this, because what I really want to stress on this is that I think we knew this from the very beginning that we were being lied to. I think it was clear with the evidence suggested, but it's difficult to get beyond that without honest engagement from authorities that have the resources. just to do it. And so ultimately, I think we kind of already know what's happening here. I have my opinion. They're not saying it's proof, but at the end of the day, I don't find it fruitful to dive through the rabbit hole that's being created that deviates from the current conversation, especially since I feel like we've already generally accepted what I think the evidence points to.

Starting point is 01:36:38 But that's not to say that nobody should care about it because clearly I think we all have to care about what the actual truth is and that we can prove that. But they've created this weird situation where that's almost like we don't expect it anymore other than the narrative. Like it's by design, I think. And it's all kind of abstract. I'm sure you can see that. But it's just the opinion here. And I think what reason I'm saying all this is that as we go through this, I feel like

Starting point is 01:37:01 it's partly a trap to kind of fall into what will become a never-ending kind of nigher screaming partisan debate. But I'm going to point to some things I think are relevant. And I think it's important that if you find this relevant to keep researching it, just be cautious. That's what I'm saying about how this is. just like the earlier conversation. So first, as Candace rightly points out,

Starting point is 01:37:21 which I find insane, you can honestly, she writes, you honestly can't make this up. Footage of Tyler Robinson turning himself into police does not exist. The footage simply does not exist anymore. Or maybe it never exists

Starting point is 01:37:33 in the first place you decide. And it's a local, two KUTV, two news, investigates, discovers possible missing evidence in Charlie Kirk murder case. Okay, so this is a core point to this,

Starting point is 01:37:45 as we were arguing from the very beginning. as, like I kept saying, you got the morons in the conversation screaming about how it was a Democrat or we know it was, you know, and that was meant to lose you. I mean, it matters to a degree, but at that point we didn't even know. And of course, we're assuming the person they claim is guilty. It's the official narrative. Anyway, the point is that it was, I was skeptical of this. Because at the end of the day, there was no evidence. You couldn't prove that was the case. And then it became that he confessed to the person he lived with and then ultimately that his father turned him in. that he admitted to them.

Starting point is 01:38:19 And there's so many weird secondary points, and it came out kind of early that maybe wasn't even true. But none of this was even really verified. Now that it comes back around, that we don't even have it on video that he even confessed. Guys, there is so much to question about this.

Starting point is 01:38:34 I mean, I just think we have to acknowledge that this is a manipulative conversation with the evidence we already know with the weird actions. I just recently covered yet again about how they acted immediately after the shooting. Nobody with a brain is, going to look at the way that went and go, yeah, that all lines up. Now, that doesn't necessarily

Starting point is 01:38:51 mean they're involved. There may be always something else that ends up being the case later that we look back and go, oh, okay, now that explains itself. But you can't look at it and go, yeah, that's exactly what should have happened. Neither with Butler or any of these conversations. You just got to stop lying to yourself for partisan reasons. The fact that we don't have the actual confession at this point screams there's something larger going on to me. Now, of course, what you get from the typical plebe of Glenn Beck and Jack Posobic, just listening to the evidence that has come out, I don't know how Tyler Robinson isn't already pleading guilty. Oh, gee, I'm shocked. They both absolutely trust the official story inside with the

Starting point is 01:39:26 government narrative, but we're fighting the deep state, children. Okay. So here is Cernovich doing something similar. And again, my point of this is not to go through all the evidence. If you want to, it's out there. I think the reality of this is already clear that we're being lied to. And I find it impossible this point to really parse most of this out. It will clear out, I'm sure, at least what we can see. but here's the point on this. This weird narrative about his iron bone structure. I mean, we aren't this stupid. Of course, Cernovich points to this.

Starting point is 01:39:56 I mean, what looks like, what, Wikipedia? Smart. But it's, oh, no, actually, it might be a study. But in a case, it's irrelevant. The claim of what happened with Martin Luther King, Jr. You know, that the reality that the government killed him, that was actually proven in a civil court case that Corbett's covered relentlessly in a good way,

Starting point is 01:40:13 like many times over the years pointed this out. and we just don't act like we don't know that as they praise him every year. The U.S. government killed this person or was involved with his death. Martin Luther King Jr., Sernovich, writes, shot with a 30-odd-six, bullet lodged inside. No exit won't. Oh, okay. So, see, guys, the current government narrative is totally legit, as evidenced by this other totally legitimate narrative.

Starting point is 01:40:38 You just cat a laugh at these people. Now, who's maybe he's right. My point, though, is that first of all, or I guess many other points, I don't think I included it. Like, if you want to look around, there is tons. Like, even with the Butler thing and the shooting, you know, the ear, like, guys, there's so much evidence from actual experts in ballistics who will every which way tell you that's not even possible what you saw. He would have bruising or anything else.

Starting point is 01:41:01 But in this case, the same thing, that the idea of that bullet not going through, I mean, you could see, like I'm saying, there's examples of people who are ballistic expert doing shooting displays and showing you what it looks like with that bullet shooting through a body. It blows it up. End of the day, it's willfully ignorant for people to pretend like this makes sense. Now, I'll admit anything is possible for any number of reasons. Because let's just say there's another data point we didn't know.

Starting point is 01:41:24 Maybe something else, Jane, we're wrong with the bullet. I mean, who knows? But with what we have in front of us, that's just lazy and basically saying, here's another narrative we know the government lied about, and that's why this lines up. These people are not on your side. Now, this gets into where I think is mostly important for today. Shadow Vesra post-Agent Brian Davis confirming what company was used to verify the text exchanges. You won't find this to be very surprising and should very much question whether those text exchanges are even real.

Starting point is 01:41:56 As part of the investigation was a Cellbrite extraction performed on Mr. Twig's phone. Yes, it was. Did you personally review that extraction? Yes, I have. And according to that extraction, did Mr. Rutgers? Robinson and Mr. Twiggs exchanged text messages on September 10th through 11th, 2025? Yes, they did. What time was that first text sent according to the Selbright extraction?

Starting point is 01:42:27 The first text was September 10th at 11 p.m. Well, Selbright is a obvious Israeli intelligence-connected app. We've talked about this a lot. And what I find very interesting about this to come back to this point really quickly, is this is what the Fox News article is saying. That's what they're referring to. Accused Charlie Kirk assassin allegedly confessed in texts. So wait, but I thought we said it was a video and that he did on video and the father.

Starting point is 01:43:04 And wait a minute. Like all this is getting all spun out. Surprise, surprise. And the end of the day, the point is that is the core. And that's what they're using to rationalize that he confessed. So again, who knows? Maybe. But as Mel writes, and you should very much be considering,

Starting point is 01:43:19 why would the Utah special beer investigation hire a private Israeli company to conduct digital forensics on this text exchange when Utah is home to the largest computer forensics lab in all of the western United States? Sure, you can think of some logical answers there. And when the state has a contract with the digital forensics crime lab in Utah Tech University, well, maybe because the Israeli company had an interest in making this go a certain direction. That's the logical. That's what she's suggesting.

Starting point is 01:43:51 That there is an Israeli connection to this, which many people are discussing. And I don't even need to go through it all again. The obvious nature of why Charlie Kirk became a major threat to the Israeli government narrative and the Zionist narrative in this country in the control of the U.S. government. And he started to see that Zionist problem and challenged the Iran conversation. Now he's not here anymore. I mean, his audience, Turning Point USA, which has basically been forced into some kind of pro-Israel Republican platform, despite most of them calling it out before that.

Starting point is 01:44:19 On stage, Glenn Beck, the rest, bringing up U.S. Liberty, like they got a lot of pushback. The point, though, is that clearly he got moved out of the way, and this whole thing marched in line around the agenda that he was calling out. There's not hard to see, guys. So let's talk about Sell Bright. And we've covered this. This goes back to 2020.

Starting point is 01:44:38 This is a show I did a long time ago. July 6th. Stanford says COVID death rate almost zero for those under 40. Israeli pre-crime used on Americans. That's Selebright. Now, we covered this in multiple cases. The main point here was about the Israeli Selbright. Oh, actually, I think I forgot I grabbed it.

Starting point is 01:44:59 Yeah, this is just somebody I used to follow on, I think it was a hive, I think. Any case, Verva VAPid, June 6th, 2020. Selbright can hack any device with UFED extraction technology, WikiLeaks Archive, which is what he's highlighting. the bottom line, you guys, is this is used to spy on Americans and set up cases for why people were about to commit crimes. And this is exactly what we're seeing today. Now, that's assuming it's even legitimate not being used to actually insert information or cover up information. Either way, it's a directly tied to Israeli intelligence company. This is from 2016, goes back

Starting point is 01:45:36 even further to Trump's administration, or technically I think we just before it. FBI's outside party, the point, first of all, I guess secondarily, is that it goes through all of these. people. It goes from, I mean, it goes back a long way. Most certainly between Bush, or excuse me, between Biden and Trump, but it's not unique to left and right. It's not unique to either of them. I just want to make it clear this has been used consistently through all of them. FBI's outside party, and we remember this conversation, revealed as Bureau angles to keep new hacks secret. So remember that whole thing about the FBI and the Apple phone, San Bernardino? Probably set up just to cause all this. Guess what group it was, which looking back, we, I don't

Starting point is 01:46:13 think I recognize what it was the time. It was so bright, guys. It was so bright. The FBI wants to classify its new alternate method of unlocking the suspect San Bernardino Shooter's phone, which in and of itself was a very clearly psychological operation

Starting point is 01:46:28 dynamic. Oh, look, his passports right there on the table. Keeping it secret even from Apple itself. Actually, I can grab this one for you real quick. Come on. That's crazy. Oh, it's one word. What was it again? I'm just going to copy it. I think it's important to

Starting point is 01:46:56 show this because this is one that we talked about in particular around sort of like the false flag conversation but it was also around the FBI kind of manufacturing events was it this one shoot maybe this one

Starting point is 01:47:14 but if I can't find that I'll try to include it afterward but it was a it's an important conversation around kind of setting these things up yeah I'm not sure which one it was in any case continuing on this so to get into his phone. They needed to get past

Starting point is 01:47:33 the technology. And the Guardian confirmed with government officials on Wednesday back in 2016 that the technique does enable the FBI to get into his phone. And they wanted this to be secret. However, the government has now has to be very cautious

Starting point is 01:47:49 about when to use this method. Oh, right. They want you to pretend they're being cautious, which was provided by an outside party. They didn't want you to know. And it says, and that's what that was their quote. And according to the guardians, Danny Yadron writes, and according to additional reporting by Reuters on Wednesday, the outside party is Israeli software company called Selbright, which creates,

Starting point is 01:48:15 among other things, a forensics system used by law enforcement, military, and intelligence that retrieves data hidden, hidden inside of mobile devices, not just locked by an advice, but hidden. As the verge notes, Sellbrite's involvement in the case is not a. total surprise. The company has a sole source contract with the FBI that it's signed in 2013. See? Specifically to help the mobile forensics and data extraction exactly the task presented by the San Bernardino case. Who cares about your constitutional rights, right? Guys, they don't care. So I just think it's very interesting. It goes back to that case we all talked about, and now it seems very relevant. So these were the building stepping stones for this control grid that

Starting point is 01:48:58 was already being put together. Here's the article from, was this the verge and his rarely company is reportedly helping the FBI crack the San Brina phone Vietnam buying Israeli spyware to repress opposition sell bright that's what this is this is from 2021 because rarely intelligent software sellbride is supplying Vietnam digital surveillance tools which it has used to quash opposition according to herettes you know so like illegally guys like literally using this to quash the opposition that like this is what are this is what corrupt governments do. The very things they claim they fight over the, you know, for free elections as they are

Starting point is 01:49:38 the ones actually doing this. U.S. is real. Now here is Derek's article from 2024, as we pointed to too many times, meet the spyware companies preparing to unleash their tech during Trump's second term. Too bad we didn't do anything about it. We could have. Too late now, it looks like. It's Albright, along with the others we discussed, bold end, NSO group, Pegasusus, Clearview,

Starting point is 01:49:58 AI. The point is, SELbright is another Israeli firm which signed a contract with ICE worth 9.6 million for forensic equipment and services. Subbright is known for its ability to exploit vulnerabilities and cell phones,

Starting point is 01:50:12 both iOS and Android. The company has worked with the FBI, the London Metropolitan Police Service, and the Russian government. Selbright told Forbes, the company's new contract was with Homeland Security investigations, a law enforcement agency with the HHS.

Starting point is 01:50:26 It just keeps getting worse and worse with a different justification every day. doesn't it? This is from 2019. Ice notice of intent to award contract the SELBright for smartphone hacking technology. Now, June 24th, 2026, recently, public records show FBI secretly extracted data from ICE protesters' phones. Can you guess what that technology was? Yes, it was SELBride. So now we're talking about another example where all the way to today, ICE and the FBI are all using this to illegally take information from your phones, violating your constitutional rights, and in many cases, people who were not breaking

Starting point is 01:51:01 the law, protesters, people who were there legally, and because they wanted to find a reason to go after them. That's what they were doing, guys. They're abusing their power to abuse American rights. It's just, and using Israeli intelligence technology that's spying on you all the time anyway. This is what I'm trying to highlight people. This is what we're dealing with. This is not new. Your government's doing all of this. Now, at the same time, Libertarian Party, this, me realizing nearly everyone on the Epstein list is free, but I have to go to court for a traffic ticket. Yeah, Americans are getting frustrated, guys. People in the world are getting frustrated. Because as it gets more authoritarian and more dystopian, it becomes easier and easier to be able

Starting point is 01:51:44 to acknowledge it. But the point is, yeah, the Epstein files that's not, there's not going away, but this administration desperately wants you to pretend it doesn't matter, even though most of their own people, absolutely believe it matters. Now, on top of that, these are just a couple more examples of things showing you this administration in particular is not on your side. No more or less than the last one, but the point is people somehow think this one's fighting for them. Tony writes, ObamaCare premium is projected to rise 14% in 2027. Thomas Massey writes, might as well call it Trump care now. Our party, the Republican Party, has made no serious effort to repeal Obamacare and legalize affordable health insurance after taking control.

Starting point is 01:52:24 of the House, Senate, and White House. Why? Because, and now, whatever you think about what should happen, the point is, he disagrees with this, and they've all argued they want to fight Obamacare, right? Well, now they don't really. Why? Because the current system enriches insurance and hospital companies. So as always, whether it's FISA, whether it's, I mean, you go down the list, guys. They'll go bad vaccine, bad food dies, bad glyphosate, oh, bad, yeah, we don't want to,

Starting point is 01:52:51 and then do all of it, and then support all of it. and then literally argue why FISA saves lives and Democrats are trying to stop it. Like, that's how dumb they think we are, guys. The reality is they don't care about anything they try to sell you on. They didn't want Ron Paul to be part of their administration. They didn't want Thomas Massey to be part of the administration. They wanted to let you think they wanted that to make you think you cared about their ideas. In this case, Obamacare was just a talking point, guys.

Starting point is 01:53:15 Now they're using it or they're not stopping it because it benefits them. That's government for you. Here's John Rich. it's funny and don't forget by the way he's like some kind of land appointee dealing with like a land bureau

Starting point is 01:53:29 I don't even I forget the name of the group but he's an official advisor to the U.S. government at this point or he's about to be which is not a meritocracy I said it last time

Starting point is 01:53:38 it's just it's just some weird form of like a nepotism even though not family there's probably got a word for it but that's what we're dealing with it's like political nepotism it's like just any you agree with me

Starting point is 01:53:48 then we're going to give you power but it says and it's not unique to left and right It's funny, he writes, once the globalists realized, we weren't afraid of hantavirus, it just disappeared. And I said, so you're saying Trump and RFK are globalists? I happen to agree, but surprised to see you say that. It's not what he means.

Starting point is 01:54:05 The point was, guys, do you know who was starting this and who got called out by a lot of us? RFQ Jr., Donald Trump faced backlash after Hantavirus Prep Act declaration or pushing vaccines or pushing flu vaccine mandates or, you know, everything they claimed they're finding. but John Rich is either too much of a coward or too blind to actually call it out. But I agree. They are global. It's hilarious to me. It's like not calling out the flock point.

Starting point is 01:54:29 So if you're going to call out that the antivirus stop because, well, then, and global, then why aren't you acknowledging the people who were pushing the fear and using the prep act to actually, I mean, it's exactly what happened under Biden and the point about, like, somebody was just telling me, I forget that was, that he's the new Fauci, or Fage, the new vouchie. He's already doing plenty of things that are in line with exactly the kind of direction. that we were seeing before. They're not, and whether he's being forced to or not is irrelevant to me at this point.

Starting point is 01:54:55 He's not calling it out is the point right now. They'll passively point to it and then try to hide from it. But here's the point on top of that, as we showed you before, military reserves course and reverses course, excuse me, and again, mandates flu shots for most military and civilian personnel. So they lie, they want you to think they weren't going to do it, then they put it back. I said, can this please be the last draw for those remaining few who, are still hoping or pretending this administration is anything different from all those before it?

Starting point is 01:55:26 You mean, is John Rich not know that or is he not care or anybody else? Like how you can die on this hill and have them reverse course and people will still blindly support them. Not anybody honest, in my opinion. Here's another example. House Republicans account comes out and goes, the right to keep and bear arms is not up for negotiation. Oh, you're so brave. Free speech we care about. No, you can't say that.

Starting point is 01:55:48 You know, it's like you guys don't care. You're just yelling out what you think people want to hear. These are token talking points. Like you guys are pathetic. And of course, even Twitter goes this account, the House Republicans account, previously posted strong Second Amendment support similar to this post, yet HR 645 remains stalled in committee, which is something they wanted while they lean into legislation that's not in the interest of Second Amendment. Not a secret, guys.

Starting point is 01:56:14 Twitter can call it out. People can see it. And Steve says, why haven't you passed Massey's national constitution? Carriac then because they don't care about these things. They feign caring about things they know we care about. Now, we should question Massey too, but he has been consistently doing things that I think are in line with what he says he believes in. But this is not a new talking point.

Starting point is 01:56:35 Derek wrote this in 2025. Gun rights groups condemn Trump's DOJ for defending National Firearms Act. Many of them. Like directly gun owners of America came out and aggressively called out the Donald Trump Justice Department supporting gun registration under the necessary. proper and commerce clauses. So, oops. This is the main one.

Starting point is 01:56:54 After months of waiting, the U.S. Justice Department submitted its brief. Unfortunately, Bondi defends the, thing it, the NFA and uses some of the worst of the gun control lobby's talking points. So it's not new. They don't care about what you think they do if you believe in these people, guys. So moving this into some Iran conversation to finish this up. Because think about this in the context,

Starting point is 01:57:18 even though it's not explicitly related to, you know, the larger surveillance conversation and what these new things, the new kind of shifts in the global discussion are doing. Trump says, and this is to start, first of all, we'll get into some of the debate, you know, what was said and what wasn't said. Trump says, on the eighth, and this is link sharing, do you think he actually believes his own lies? He says, the Iran war has been a tremendous military success.

Starting point is 01:57:43 The oil prices are lower than when I started and Twitter goes, nope, not correct. So how many times can this happen, you know, on any number of things, where Trump or by or any of them, any side of anything. But, you know, right now, Heg Seth, Cash Patel, where they'll come out and sells you big narrative and then even Twitter, for whatever reason, simply goes not true. Crude was treating a 67 before the war began in February. It's currently, I think, 71 right now. So, see, he's lying to you. Or he's being misled by the clowns around him. It doesn't really matter to me at this point.

Starting point is 01:58:16 so he lied to you on the 8th. I just think it's important. So we're still in the midst of this deceptive, like, childishly, I mean, I don't know what you would call it, whether it's lying or that he's being deceived. Again, it kind of doesn't matter for the real point, but overall, it's just become a cartoon, guys. It is really embarrassing. Like, even for people like us that call this out, it's embarrassing.

Starting point is 01:58:41 So let's get into this a little bit deeper, but I want to start with that and a few other points. Trump says, the U.S. Space Force has cameras in orbit capable of reading the badges of Iranian officials as they enter nuclear sites, which is right. At least as I understand it, which of course we could always be a lie, but that's what we discussed this in 2024 about the statement that the NRO made, which was literally that now you can't hide because you're constantly being looked at using Elon Musk satellite set up everywhere. even saying you have, you know, camouflage. I just played it deeper the other day, saying that look, even beyond camouflage, like we are finding ways around anything no matter where you are.

Starting point is 01:59:19 Okay. Take that for what you will. It could be a lie, but it seems to be what the technology is building towards. So the point is he's pointing to that. Trump's saying, we know. Like, he's trying to use that to make the argument,

Starting point is 01:59:30 or make you assume that he knows for sure that he's correct in what he's saying because of this, right? Well, this is typical stupidity by this administration because, as Middle East Observer rightly points out, well, well, apparently this is how they directly targeted 160 schoolgirls in Iran. Okay, yeah, with precision.

Starting point is 01:59:47 So if you're going to tell us that you have the ability to look at the name tags on the people in these facilities, then you sure as hell knew that you were bombing that children's school. And they did, guys, whether Israel made it happen or they did it, Heg Seth got caught using the bombing map that showed you it was right inside one of the bombing areas. They just hide from it. Isn't that just like the most grotesque thing in all of this? that they're either two, they monsters enough to target girl schools, or they know they did it and are too much of a coward to own up to it.

Starting point is 02:00:17 Either way, they're still working with the U.S. or the Israeli government that allows all this to happen or plays, is playing a part in what they're jointly doing. Now, kind of starting with this for the larger conversation, I want to reiterate this, June 25th, but this has been happening repeatedly. And it's so irritatingly obvious to prove, as Mint Press News highlights, A vessel near the Strait of Formuz was struck following the warnings on audio you could listen to from the Iranian government.

Starting point is 02:00:47 Now, best I can tell, as of right now, they've had numerous examples, and this is from the 25th, let's just say to today, where you've had ships, despite as we're going to get into early, the actual memorandum, what it literally says, where they know they're supposed to be going along the route that Iran has been allowed to do as according to the memorandum, and yet they don't. maybe that's because they don't care and they're stupid and they're, you know, I don't know, or maybe I think Israel or Trump's administration, excuse me, all hiccups all of a sudden are telling them to challenge those routes, whether because they want the spin out or because they wanted to try to make it look like they're winning. I mean, who knows? The bottom line is best I can tell.

Starting point is 02:01:29 These ships have gone up against and deliberately violating the memorandum of the Trump signed and going against the route they've agreed to. and then they get fired on, not bomb an attack, fired on as a deterrent, and they leave. No one is killed, the ships aren't sunk,

Starting point is 02:01:45 nothing is stolen. Now, unless I'm missing something, that seems to be all, every time. So how are we framing this as anything other than an obvious act of restraint to push them back

Starting point is 02:01:56 from an illegal route they're not supposed to be taking, even according to what Trump signed of the memorandum? That's very obviously what keeps happening. Now, to get into this, It's important to understand that this happened a series of times on, I think, the seventh and the eighth,

Starting point is 02:02:10 and then Trump used that to attack them. That's how this started again. I mean, there's no debating that, guys. The argument is, well, you bomb those ships, so we had to respond. Well, let's get into that because it's easy to prove. The U.S. hits dozens of Iranian targets in retaliatory strikes after ship attacks and trade of removes. Even CBS and Mainstream media says in earlier, the earlier Iranian strikes were on tanker strikes. not strikes.

Starting point is 02:02:38 The deterrent, I guess, I mean, well, I guess strikes will be appropriate, but the way they're framing it there is to make it sound like their bombing strikes in response. Like they struck first in the U.S. responded. That's the U.S. narrative. This is even the adversarial media. Understand that. They're not really. But the point is that they shot at those ships to turn them around.

Starting point is 02:02:56 They didn't sink the ships as far as I can tell. They were on tankers trying to transit the straight via a route. Iran has warned ships against. against using. Okay. So let's just even say it's not the valid way. You publicly know that Iran said, don't use that route or we're going to shoot.

Starting point is 02:03:14 And you do anyway? It's so obviously deliberate, guys, that's being made to happen. So the Treasury Department on Tuesday revoked the waiver allowing Iran to sell oil. Okay, so that's a violation of the memorandum. But they're saying it's in response to their violation. Okay, so let's be intelligent about this and look through the evidence.

Starting point is 02:03:32 Oh, and then this is, the Khabisi letter says that Iran has suspended talks on a final settlement with the United States. Let's come back to that. Because what's funny about that is that's on the 8th in the morning. And then what do you get? You get Trump going, we're done with the ceasefire after they said it first. Like you just such,

Starting point is 02:03:46 I mean, you have to laugh at the insecurity of this man. He has to be the one. I'm the one that says it's over. No more deal, even though Ron just said, we're done. And then,

Starting point is 02:03:56 and you keep, you can consistently prove this looking back. That's what I keep laughing about. But here's the memorandum. Now look, this is a very obvious, this document has been upheld by Trump's administration. Trump literally signed it and you can see the signed documentation.

Starting point is 02:04:15 I've shared it myself. Like, one of the reasons it's been shared is because you literally can see his signature right next to the one that discusses the money. But here's the point, guys. The number one part of the memorandum. Now, again, to understand this, if you don't know the conversation, this was simply a memorandum. They're not bound by law.

Starting point is 02:04:35 This is a statement of acknowledgement for what will maybe lead to an agreement. So there's not like some legal consequence, but either way, they made an agreement that they wouldn't do these things in the hope that they would get to some kind of larger ceasefire. So in the midst of this, what did we have? The U.S. continually creating justification to claim Iran violated it. Let's go through it. Number one, declare the immediate and permanent termination of military operations on all fronts, including Lebanon.

Starting point is 02:05:02 Never happened. Not once. Not even Trump denies that. And on top of that, Israeli media continues to report that Trump told Netanyahu he didn't have to follow that right up until recently. Now, of course, they could be lying. Netanyahu could be lying to them. But either way, that's what they're claiming. So my point is that if Israel never stopped, they never did.

Starting point is 02:05:20 They, in fact, proudly said they're not bound by this and they will keep going. Even though Iran said in this meeting and the U.S. agreed that Israel's absolutely a part of this. And as it says, all fronts. So never once has the U.S. been in compliance or Israel with this memorandum. So that's the first point. You can't deny that. So which means in anybody's minds, the thing was never actually met. But even though that happened, Iran continued to maintain it.

Starting point is 02:05:47 Why? Because they still benefit from it. So it says to, and also in number one, to refrain from the threat or use of force. Well, Trump has been threatening them every other day since this started. So he's also violating that. Still doesn't matter. Iran still complied with what it was doing. Number two, refrain from interfering in each other's interturnal affairs.

Starting point is 02:06:04 Well, come on. It's obviously not happening. There's no examples of Iran doing that as much as they love to freak out and claim that. You can't, I don't see any evidence of that. It wouldn't surprise me. But what you can clearly continue to show is the U.S. actively doing things to manipulate this country. Number five, upon signing the memorandum,

Starting point is 02:06:22 the Islamic Republic of Iran, will make arrangements, that's the important one, using its best efforts for the safe pass of commercial vessels. The Islamic Republic of Iran will conduct dialogue with the Sultan, the Sultanate of Oman to define the future administration and maritime services in the street. Trump signed this document. So the two things that shows you, and you can always debate whether it's absolutely, the point is that you allow Iran to make their arrangements to create safe passage.

Starting point is 02:06:53 So then if you're telling ships to not follow that route, then you're creating the context for the violation of the memorandum. and for them to stop them is in line with what anybody else would do and a waterway controlled by any other dynamic. And so the point on top of that is you're then in the memorandum, allow them to make agreements with Armandum to set up the future administration of the strait. And now you're, I mean, you have to see how willfully dishonest the whole thing is.

Starting point is 02:07:18 As far as they can tell Iran is not once violated this outside of them pointing to something they did in response to what they drove into reality. Or violating the memorandum by Trump going through a wrong direction and they fire on them. The only argument I would make is about whether or not tolls were effectively taken in a larger context. The debate is whether there was some kind of agreement, let's say, with a Chinese ship. And whether that's a massive toll applied to everybody or their personal agreements with groups they're allied with. It's a fair point. But you can argue that they had some, again, the point of the toll was about no tolls in the street.

Starting point is 02:07:51 As far as I could tell, there's not some deliberate toll for everyone going through. So you can decide on that point. But as I said, either way, they never once complied with this from the start because of Lebanon because of threats. Number six, at least USD, at least $300 billion for reconstruction, despite Trump continually lying about that or trying to sidestep what it means. Also, it says the US United States government, the United States of America undertakes to terminate all types of sanctions while they reinitiated sanctions. So that's also a violation. Number 11, the United States of America undertakes to make fully available for. use the frozen or restricted funds for Iran upon the implementation of the memorandum.

Starting point is 02:08:32 Now, I, from my, what I can see, I think it's proven that they've sent at least three billion, which is insane when you think about it. Trump was just again and what he called the JCPO, whatever he said. The fact that he doesn't even know what it's called and that he's clumsily talking about Obama's deal, even though it's what he's dealing with is way where it's embarrassing. I think he called it the J-C OPA or something stupid like that or P-O-C. That's embarrassing, guys. He's the president of the United States and he barely knows what he's talking about.

Starting point is 02:09:02 But the bottom line is that they've already did this. And that's why he's trying to kind of talk about the money and the plane. It was a beautiful plane. And all this money came pouring out, not even close to what actually happened. And it was their money, as everyone with the brain knows that they stole just like's happening right here. Frozen or unrestricted funds that they took from them. and yet he still lies about it. Probably because he doesn't even know he's wrong at this point.

Starting point is 02:09:25 I'm starting to get the sense that he's just that embarrassing. But keeping this in mind, Ron, your colleague, says the U.S. bombed 90 targets on the 8th to the 9th. 90 targets. Iran is reporting 14 killed with 78 injured since the U.S. strikes restarted on Wednesday. We'll get into what they bar. I mean, actually, I don't want to get into in depth because even now these things are hard to prove and define.

Starting point is 02:09:49 They murdered people. They bombed civilian. locations, they bombed civilian infrastructure in Trump even publicly threatened. But I believe it was Israel that carried it out. Trump seems to think that he can bully Iran into relinquishing control of the straight, that he, by the way, signed them allowing to have a control over with the same failed in criminal strategy as three months ago. If it didn't work then, it's not going to work now. The only thing this will accomplish is dragging out pain to the global economy while spreading further death and destruction across the region. I agree. Ten bucks says Israel did this. I believe

Starting point is 02:10:21 he's right. That's Dan McAdam saying that. The Hormuz letter says breaking the United States has begun striking bridges, hitting Octokan Bridge and the Goldstein province of northern Iran and the Gorgon Railway Line per farce. This is the deepest U.S. strike in Iran since March. And yet again, ladies and gentlemen, I say this every time. I mean, think about how insane it is that we're talking about U.S. government striking directly in the heart of Iran and now even striking civilian infrastructure. And you're telling us the monster terrorist maniac governor Ron has not once bombed back inside of the United States. Thank God. I mean, think about that,

Starting point is 02:10:58 guys. Like there's no, from a legal perspective, they have the right to bomb the person bombing them, but they haven't. I mean, not only does it show restraint, it shows you the, the aware, like, I mean, I could put my own thoughts on what I think their mindset is, but that's restraint, guys. That's choosing not to take it to another level because you know that. that will cause this to spin out to a degree that will bet. And of course, you could argue that's because they're afraid. They're winning this. They're literally winning in this entire dynamic.

Starting point is 02:11:25 They've gained the entire time. And it's obvious that the U.S. and Israel are lying about what they're accomplishing. So why in the world? I think it's obvious. You could decide for yourself. But the point is not even about whether they're like, okay, if you're going to argue that they're making decisions based on rational interest, then wait a minute. I thought you were telling me they were a rational monster terrorist.

Starting point is 02:11:43 They can't even think outside of their evil agenda and their willingness to kill Jews. So you pick one, guys. Clearly, they're being rational and showing restraint. So what I'm highlighting is if they're the evil terrorist monsters, then why wouldn't they have taken the excuse? Because they don't care about their people, right, guys, right Trump? They just kill everybody. Then why wouldn't they be attacking everywhere? It's obvious to see that they're not who they say they are.

Starting point is 02:12:05 Doesn't mean good versus bad, but it easily means they're lying about what Iran's government is. And then they strike civilian infrastructure in a flagrant war crime. I believe it was Israel. Kabesi later, Iran has suspended talks on a final settlement with the United States. Now, this is what happened. So in the midst of these ongoing Iran said, we're done talking to them. And that's when you got Trump following up acting like he was the one canceling everything. Iran warns Israel will face retaliation for attacks on Iranian infrastructure.

Starting point is 02:12:37 So Iran believes it was Israel. And they're calling out Israel for the targeting of those things. But Trump publicly said, like two days ago, that we may have to bomb. I think I've got it in here. civilian infrastructure again. I don't know why that doesn't hurt him. There's no world in which that's justified, guys. That's an illegal act in everybody's minds and just people let it go.

Starting point is 02:12:58 Oh, well, it's a bargaining tactic. Clearly not. They just bombed them, guys. Here are a bunch of fishing boats that they bombed claiming they were IRGC speed boats. Well, nope, just a bunch of fishing boats. They bombed in the harbor because they are just belligerent, it seems. Goli Bough on the 8th came out and said, America still hasn't learned that bullying and breaking promises are no longer cost-free.

Starting point is 02:13:27 Let me put that plainly. If you strike, you'll get hit. And guess what? It's my point, guys. You can time this out. Then you get Trump coming out going, you hit, we'll hit twice as hard. He's in a game of social media, and he's like, he's on the moon. I'd say, as if he doesn't even know what's happening.

Starting point is 02:13:42 Like, it's embarrassing. This is not some narrative tit for tat. losing in every real sense you can monitor or you can put it metrics for right now. Don't flail around pointlessly or you'll sink even deeper. The Strait of Hermuz will only open with Iranian arrangements, not American threats. By the way, the arrangements that Trump already agreed to. So the point you say, my point there is that this comes out and then he responds as if he's the one making the threat and it just shows weakness.

Starting point is 02:14:10 At the very least an insecurity that he's the one not in control. Iranian parliament speaker Ghalibov warned Washington after two days. of renewed strikes that America hasn't learned its lesson. And it says, Gullaboff, one of Iran's two lead negotiators, spoke as the memorandum neared collapse after Iran strikes on three tankers that defied its designated routes. The U.S. hit more than 80 targets, revoked oil sanctions, waivers, and more and moved Iran calls a blatant violation of the deal, which it obviously is, and struck again Wednesday and Iran targeted U.S. bases in Buran and Kuwait, two groups that have continually given support and refueling and base it to the U.S.

Starting point is 02:14:45 in Israel. It's not some kind of crime to attack the belligerents that are engaged in attacking them in an illegal war, just not started on illegal aggression. Now, this is about, oh, this was about the locations, Qatar, Bahrain, Kuwait. Glenn says from the start of the U.S. Israeli attack Iran, Gulf state tyrannies, the U.S. calls our allies, have been pummeled hard by Iran, including U.S. assets there, many major bases, billions of dollars. But because these dictatorships punish anyone reporting it, most Americans never hear of it. Unless Trump screams that they just committed war crimes by attacking people bombing them, because that's not stupid at all.

Starting point is 02:15:27 But Marwa Osman points out, the U.S. has 800 military bases across 80 countries. Do you know how many the next country, the next highest country has? 145 across 42 countries. And you know what that is? The U.K. 880 bases compared to 1.45 is the second amount. Highest amount. So no.

Starting point is 02:15:52 These military bases right here. U.S. bases on high alert for attack by Iran. Always the threat. Oh, my God, the Iran will terrorists attack us. These military bases are not to protect Americans. They are there to dominate the world through military power. Nobody. Does anybody not know that at this point?

Starting point is 02:16:08 If a military base on a territory of one of 80 countries hosting U.S. forces is used to launch attacks against the sovereign state, it is entirely foreseeable that the targeted state will view that base as legitimate, as a legitimate military target. That's not even debatable. It literally is by every metric, every point of international law.

Starting point is 02:16:27 You bomb them, they can respond. The people of countries hosting such bases should be asking why their governments allowed that territory to be used, right? So then they get bombed. It's what Israel does to the United States. Accountability begins with those who initiated and facilitated the attacks,

Starting point is 02:16:42 not with those who retaliated. watching some Arab governments and citizens condemn Iran for striking multiple installations that were clearly used to launch attacks against, it's remarkable. It is. It's embarrassing, but it's an agenda. Okay. So on the night, this is how embarrassing this gets, guys. I mean, it really is this stupid.

Starting point is 02:17:00 Here's what Trump said. After all that we just went through, and after all the screaming claims he made about how we were going to, you know, wiped them off the map again, bomb civilian infrastructure again. I'm right and they bomb back and forth. Iran responds and the U.S. kills innocent people like they do every single time. Israel bombs civilian infrastructure.

Starting point is 02:17:21 And this is what he says the next day. Many ways we can win. But we've already won militarily. They have very little left. And they want to make a deal so badly. They called a little while ago they want to make a deal so badly. I just don't know if they're worthy of making the deal. I don't know that they're going to honor the deal.

Starting point is 02:17:39 Oh, right. If they want to make a deal, why do you think they attacked commercial vessels? Because... You're stupid the corporate media is. Is that what happened? Or can you verifiably point to the fact that you, on the record, Ron, is going turn around. This is not the appropriate route. Even CBS News can write because they went the wrong route.

Starting point is 02:17:59 It's just stupid. It's stupid. Who knows if that's some kind of Fox News reporter giving him a lob? He wants. Sad. It's not a crazy. To be honest, great. They're a little bit out of control.

Starting point is 02:18:11 But they want to make it deal. God, I don't even know how to describe how embarrassing, how, like, revolting it is almost. Who respects this person? You know, and the worst this gets, the more people want to pretend it's about you just hate him because you're deranged me wherever. It's like, come on.

Starting point is 02:18:28 This is a special kind of, like, dictatorial stupidity. But Biden was a senile stupidity dictatorial. You know, it's a different flavor, but equally alarming because it's just government. It's authoritarian control over your lives. But this man, I just don't understand why anybody takes him seriously at this point with what he continues to say. Listen to this again. But we've already won militarily.

Starting point is 02:18:51 More militarily. Let's explain that. I don't even need to debate this because I don't even think even his supporters pretend that's even real. Oh, it's a tactic to get them in position. But we all know it's a lie, though, right? We know it's a lie because it's not true because we keep seeing their ships control the straight. We keep seeing them. What are we lying about?

Starting point is 02:19:08 I mean, the reality is, as Robert showed you way back when they made these tunnels in the, in the mountains for underwater canals where they put their ships knowing this was coming and now continue to show you that for any number of examples. But if you want military, then why are you still bombing them? Why you just take over? So you're telling me you're wasting billions in munitions because you won already? I mean, you know, you have to laugh at anybody that takes us face value. And that is most of the corporate media. that's sad. Have very little,

Starting point is 02:19:40 ever little left and they want to make a deal. Jaw thing, he's never little, you know, it's like, it's weird. It's like his weird, like tick when he's making things up.

Starting point is 02:19:48 He's so badly they called. Oh, they called. They won't please, Trump, who would make a deal. How does that make sense with anything you've seen?

Starting point is 02:19:56 Anything. But okay, so you bomb them, and now they're scared to make a deal. Why didn't they do it the last time? Or it's not before. Or the time before.

Starting point is 02:20:02 13 times before that. As we'll get into next, Iran laughed when he said this. They laughed. say that's ridiculous. You were such a clown. You know, it's like, let's make out of the Lego video about how dumb these people are. That's what's happening right now.

Starting point is 02:20:13 A little while ago, they want to make a deal so badly. Oh, my God. I just don't know if they're worthy of making it. Yeah, maybe they're not even worth it. Then what are we doing? So explain that point to me with anything else that's happening. Maybe it's not even worth it. I'm just going to not even make a deal.

Starting point is 02:20:27 Then what are you going to do? You're going to stop? You're going to give up? Are you going to just bomb and fight and invade? At what point does this align with what Americans even want or care about, Donald Trump. Oh, he's just saying that to make Iran, whatever. It doesn't even matter anymore. It's just nonsensical spin. He is lying to you. Or, you know, narrative, you know, whatever I just say, you know, using it as a tactic, fight lies. I'm still lying to you. He's making things up,

Starting point is 02:20:52 whether it's to trick Iran. It's about you, guys. He's lying to you. Iran doesn't believe him. They literally say it every single time. He thinks you are that stupid. That's what's happening. That shouldn't assault you. No, they're going to honor the deal. That's a problem. Aside from honoring it the entire time until you break it over and over and over. Again, it's not an opinion. That's not debatable.

Starting point is 02:21:17 You can literally prove back to the beginning of this every time Trump has made a lie and every time Iran has followed through and every time that it's round and round and round. In the moment, like right now, it's certainly possible that Trump is saying that and is true and that Iran just finally changes mind. I say that every time. Tomorrow, the next day, we'll be able to look back and we'll be able to find out. and you know he's been lying to you.

Starting point is 02:21:37 You can choose to look if you want. If they want to make a deal, why do you think they attacked commercial vessels? A couple vessels were violating the agreement that Trump signed, you moron. But here we are, you know? And it's like, I don't even be that dismissive,

Starting point is 02:21:49 but it's just, it's not even worth, there's no, it's not worthy of respect. These people are ridiculous. They're not worthy of, I mean, of engaging with honesty.

Starting point is 02:21:58 So can we all just admit out loud? I wrote that literally everyone knows that Trump is lying here and has, been nearly every time before this when he used the exact same claim that was later proven to be false? I hope so because the whole collective

Starting point is 02:22:13 mass delusion thing is getting tiresome. Here is Saeed, Mamad, Brandi. Reuters comes out and says, Iran, and this is what kills me. At least they write Trump says, but that's like Israel says. They won't report whatever Hamas says, do they?

Starting point is 02:22:28 Or whatever Iran says, do they? So they just go, Iran has asked to continue talks. And U.S. agreed. Trump says. Like, that's, it's embarrassing, right? So at a time when Trump has been near consistently shown to be lying, you cite what he says, that's pretty stupid. But we know why. As Sid Montmoreandhi says, fake news, not true. We did not do that. Here's another fake news. Jennifer Jacobs, Iranian officials privately told Trump advisors that they made a mistake in shooting at commercial

Starting point is 02:22:57 they did not do that, that the attack stem from an errant sect of hardliners who are trying to undermine negotiation. My God, this is literally what Trump wants people to think. We're winning in the debate. The hard bad guys are winning out and it's not what's happening. I mean, again, certainly possible. But if you look at the facts that we have it in front of us, it's obviously not that. What seems to be the case is that that's completely made up to make it look like Trump didn't just spin out yet again. They shot those ships at them. And look, here's the thing. As we just showed you, if you have the office, of them, which other people do too, because it's maritime.

Starting point is 02:23:36 They can have the reality of them going turn around. You're going the wrong route over and over. We have the document where Trump sign says that their ability to do so. And then you're going to say the Iranian government comes out and goes, oops, we made a mistake. Why would they do that? That would then make the case that what they signed is not real. This is a deductive logic, guys.

Starting point is 02:23:57 And so she's lying or she's lying for them. It's pretty damn obvious. Of course, Mario Nob. you know, the real big-time journalist comes out and says the nuclear talks never stopped. A U.S. official confirms the negotiations continued straight through the strikes. Mario is a clown. And it says a U.S. official is what is Perci at N. And as Daniel writes, a U.S. official.

Starting point is 02:24:19 This Zionist monster, Stephen Miller, he's kind of joking. But the point is, so one of these idiots speaks up and says the lie that we want you to know. And Mario goes, the lie that he told me. U.S. official says, that's the same thing. They have been lying to your face nonstop, and you just cite what they say out loud in a topic that they've lied about more than I've ever seen. The reality is that this is so obviously not true. The reality is that they stopped based on the evidence we have in front of us.

Starting point is 02:24:51 I just think it's sad that people continue to fall for this, and Mario either willfully lies to you or is just too bad his job to care. This is from the 10th. Trump comes out and says the Islamic Republic of Iran has asked us to continue talk. in quotes, okay? We have agreed to do so, but the United States has stated to them in no uncertain terms,

Starting point is 02:25:09 the ceasefire is over. There wasn't ever a ceasefire, guys. They've bombed them multiple times throughout this process, and they never complied with the memorandum. This is my point the entire time? It's always been a game of whether or not the U.S. would just eventually cave.

Starting point is 02:25:24 Iran has been doing what they said they've been doing the entire time. Khabisi letter. Trump says Iran has asked to get in talks and has agreed to do so, but the U.S. has stated to them in no uncertain terms, fire is over. So we're done, I guess, firing during the ceasefire. How do you even read that?

Starting point is 02:25:40 So if the ceasefire is over, does that mean you're now going to not fire since you've been firing through the ceasefire? Good luck working that out. The point is they want you to pretend that Trump is tough. They want you to pretend that Trump just put his foot down. And we're done with the thing that we were not doing in the first place because we beat them. Didn't you hear? We won 37 times already. Drop site news reports. Tehran, Tehran. Iran. has not asked the U.S. to resume peace talks. A senior Iranian official says, and of course they could be lying.

Starting point is 02:26:09 Trump, they say that Trump lied about what he just said. The official said any diplomatic engagement has come only from the mediator's insistence about the U.S. expressing a desire to create a path for Trump to withdraw from the war. They're just admitting that Trump's team is going, we please give us an out.

Starting point is 02:26:27 We'll give you this, we'll give you that, please. And Trump keeps going back to the table over and over. And you can prove. this. And on top of that, by the way, DropSight News, Jeremy, who has inside sources on this, which we should question, but has been consistently correct. As you can look back and see for yourself, go through their account and look at the things they've been saying about Iran. They've been near consistently correct. Why? Because they're just listening to what Iran is saying. And Trump keeps lying. It says Iran also warned it will not tolerate US attempts to bypass the agreed monitoring mechanism

Starting point is 02:26:57 the straight. So the point is, they have been lying. Iran has been doing what it said it's going to do. the U.S. government has been lying and trying to look strong while trying to get what they want from it. And now they're saying, we did not ask to resume talks. Trump is lying. I'm shocked. Okay. So that's where we are at this point. That's today.

Starting point is 02:27:17 Trump's screaming, we're going to talk. She's fires over. And I guess we're back to square. Well, guess what? The war is continuing. Because that's what Israel wants. J.D. Vance comes out and says, if you try to close the strait, the American military will spawn. It's that simple.

Starting point is 02:27:32 That's what they're doing. I already went through this. You already know, even Robert Barnes calls them out. Vance's future just ended for at least the next half decade. I doubt that. But the point is they didn't shut the straight. In fact, the ships were going through the straight. And near to a high level had been sent, I mean, almost to a normal level, I argue,

Starting point is 02:27:50 according to information that I can't truly verify. My point, though, is that they were and the ships that they sent deliberately, I think, to try to circumvent the route or just who did it because they're stupid is the only deviation. And then you bombed them because they did what they were supposed to do based on your signed agreement and you say they closed the straight and that you acted because they closed the street. You're just making up an entire story here. Bance is just the talking head they put out to make look stupid apparently. I just think it's insane. We know that's not true.

Starting point is 02:28:22 On the 8th, this is the point. Menjo sit right. Look at how the Iran designated corridor is busy and safe. Wait a minute. Didn't he just say they shut down the straight? Yeah, because he's an idiot. He's a liar, guys. I'm, you're shocked, I know.

Starting point is 02:28:36 The straight was, they were functioning pretty highly. And it was their corridor. And then, boom, when they did this on the 10th, well, now it's shut down. At least shut down to the degree that Iran wants it to be because the U.S. is not, is not adhering to the agreement. Now we're back, I argue, to the point to which they're letting through people that are not fighting them and stopping those that are, which makes sense to me. Traceable vessel transits through the U.S. corridor, coordinated Omani Lane,

Starting point is 02:29:01 have effectively ground to a halt. There you are. So Trump did this. There's no which way around this, guys. We were at a point where this was going back to normal, and now they've driven us right back into a state of war that will affect gas prices and crude oil and everything else. Fertilizer and the whole thing.

Starting point is 02:29:19 Who knows, maybe it very much is by design. We should be asking that. Of course, here's sent com lying to you. Fact check. Iranian state media claims the transit through Strait of Hormuz permitted is only, permitted through routes designated by Iran. You realize how stupid this is?

Starting point is 02:29:35 Their statement that Trump signed allows them to dictate this. But it goes truth. Iran does not control the straight since early May. Okay. You've helped facilitate successful transit of more than 800. Well, Dropside News says Centcon claims that they have helped facilitate the transit of 800 vessels carrying 380 million barrels of crude oil. Well, if that was accurate, true, that would be more than a low.

Starting point is 02:30:01 11 commercial vessels at about 5.4 million barrels of oil every day. Does anybody believe that? You're telling me, so at the times when we could prove via GPS, you absolute clowns, that nothing was happening, that you're going to tell us you've been doing 11 vessels a day the entire time? They're not. Guys are lying. They're literally, just like Trump told you with 20 vessels they gifted us of oil.

Starting point is 02:30:24 Galdiboff was the gut. Nope, they lied about that right in the beginning. Lied about a lot of stuff, didn't they? Either way, the point is, this is about. them trying to pretend that they're in control and that no, we're the ones. This post is literally saying, we did the thing that we told them we did, we agreed to something and then we did what we wanted anyway. But then it turns out they didn't even actually do that. Talk about weakness. Like, why wouldn't you just agree? So you basically challenge the agreement, but then fail to do what

Starting point is 02:30:50 you said. They're just ineffectual clowns. On top of that, the oil overlap, as Massey writes, the strategic petroleum reserve was created to help our country during emergencies. But presidents use it to stabilize fuel prices globally. Not just for Americans, but globally. Trump has been doing it the entire time. I was saying that right in the beginning because oil is a global market, he says. If we use much more of it to mask the cost of war, which is what they're doing, he's using it to keep the prices down by manipulation, wasting your reserves.

Starting point is 02:31:22 We risk collapsing the salt caverns that hold it. Look at this. And look at where we are right now. that's insane. Based on what I understand, we're very close to complete. I mean, this is what people were screaming about under Biden's administration. Now Republicans don't seem to want to talk about it. The reality here, guys, is that this is being done so Trump can pretend that what he's doing is lowering crew prices,

Starting point is 02:31:47 yelling at gas companies to lower their prices as if that's not manipulating, you know, total, total free market. The end of the day, that is what he's been doing from the business. beginning, sacrificing your safety for his appearance of winning as he loses. Weak, exactly as we were discussing from the beginning. It's all a game to them, guys. They don't care about you. To these people, the ends absolutely justify the means. That is, of course, if we even see those ends, right?

Starting point is 02:32:19 But that's the whole Machiavellian idea, you know, the Napoleon quote, the ends never justify the means. The means are what matter, guys. How you get there always matters unless you're a dictator, like dictator, unless you're an autograph, unless you're an oligar, unless you're somebody who doesn't care about the rights of other people. Danny McAdams cites what Brett Erickson says. And first he adds, for decades of everybody gets a trophy mentality drilled into American

Starting point is 02:32:46 since preschool, when suddenly faced with the hard consequences of terrible decisions, and there is no one to back them up or extend the deadline for their homework, they throw a screaming tantrum and say, this isn't fair and stomp out of the room, sadly. As Brett writes, it's quite remarkable to watch seemingly intelligent people be angry about the Iranians using the strait as a defensive weapon and striking vessels transiting. Now, remember, even as he makes a good point, that's not what was happening, guys. They weren't just striking vessels. They were doing it to ships that were violating the transit route that they agreed to with Trump, that Trump signed. Regardless, though, he says, just a quick question, even if they were just attacking ships that were coming through because Trump was illegally bombing their country, which isn't actually attacking.

Starting point is 02:33:29 happening from Iran's side, but it says, just a quick question, why did Iran do those things? Well, I can answer that. It's because the ship's violated the transit route. But if they did bomb randomly, why would they have done that? He says, if you answer, because the United States launched an unprovoked war of aggression, congratulations, you'd be right. This isn't siding with the regime. It's not really a regime. It's just another government, like all of them, that we should be fighting, in my opinion. It's understanding the very obvious order of events that led to the street being shut down. This is a guy who clearly doesn't side with the Iranian government. but he's just using logic here,

Starting point is 02:34:00 which is that, well, they illegally bomb them for no reason, so maybe we shouldn't call them terrorists for defending themselves. Funny how that works out in the time where you're calling genocide defending yourself, huh? Now, to finish out in general, Iran hatched fresh plot to kill Trump. Israel told the U.S. Yeah, I can't even say that without laughing out loud. I mean, how insane this is. In the midst of all of this,

Starting point is 02:34:23 when you've never seen more attention called out to what Israel's doing in the world, especially in the United States, government speaks up and goes Iran wants to kill it. I mean, really? I mean, everyone kind of seemed to call this out. Israel recently shared new intelligence. I mean, think about what happened during the ongoing, you know, Gaza genocide. All the times they came out with these absurd stories that were outright fabrications. But here, Israeli intelligence says that with the U.S. that it was showed Iran was considering a new plan to assassinate Trump. Why new plan? Because they actually argue the ones before it were because of Iran wanted to kill Trump. Which makes no sense when you

Starting point is 02:34:58 actually look at what was going on before. It does for other things, though. It certainly does. But either way, who knows, certainly possible that Iran was doing this, seeing us how they murdered their families, like literally the families of people that run that country and literally murdered scientists and children and girls' schools and bridges and water infrastructure, but, you know, God forbid they should want to fight back. Now, I'm not saying that it's justified to murder and assassinate a leader. What I'm pointing out is that it's, you can understand why somebody might be driven there with what they've done. What I am pointing out, though, is Iran, has not done that. Demonstrate where Iran has tried to murder the Pope. Demonstrate where Iran

Starting point is 02:35:33 has tried to murder even sitting members of Congress or people in power. Not that I can see. They haven't even bombed inside the United States, thank God, which shows you obvious restraint. So what you do find, though, is Israel and the United States literally bombing anybody in his they can find, it seems. Bombing bridges and schools and hospitals and churches everywhere you look. I mean, just reflect on that for a second. I don't even explain anymore. So point being, certainly could be. But what many people argued was, what does that mean Israel is going to kill him? I mean, that's what seems to be the talking point. But of course, here's what the Trump administration wants you to think. While battling against the ridiculous CNN platform, that's good, the talking Iran,

Starting point is 02:36:13 bad guy, and nuclear weapons, they're all just the cartoons of the size that all want to go against Iran for Israel for a different reason, though. Either way, the point is, Scott Jennings wants you to believe that because Israel just saved our president, we know we can trust them. Watch. You seem to know exactly who Donald Trump is talking to. How do you know that? Well, just as an American watching it play out, it certainly feels as though your weapon because they keep the great military victory, a wild assertion. I just wonder what evidence of that. As a taxpaying American, I sit there and I watch this stuff play out within minutes after the markets close.

Starting point is 02:36:47 I watch before markets open. So no evidence. What he was saying was that Trump doesn't talk to generals. He only was, you know, I mean, what's funny is, yes, fair point to say that he doesn't know that as a fact. but are you claiming otherwise? I mean, really, the point becomes you're saying that without knowing that for sure. But I think we can all acknowledge that Donald Trump is not on the inside to a lot of this stuff when it comes to his actions. Or you're actually going to tell us that he knows what's going on and he says those stupid things anyway.

Starting point is 02:37:13 That's pretty embarrassing. So either way you want to look at that. It's not a point today. The point is what he says next. So here's what I think. I think we achieved a great military victory. Oh, yeah, clearly. Starting off with a good note.

Starting point is 02:37:26 The Iranian military is devastated. As they keep fighting and you're losing. I disagree with Max. I don't think they're currently on the brink of building a nuclear weapon because they can't be because of the military victory that we had achieved. I didn't say they were on the brink of building a nuclear weapons. You said we have not eradicated their nuclear program. Like Trump said they have a thousand pounds of high-enriched.

Starting point is 02:37:45 Fake debate. No, I didn't say that. They have all the things that we keep pointing to that aren't even actually valid. This is the same point. They've got a thousand pounds of the... You mean the amount that the UA, the International Atomic Energy Agency already acknowledged was completely within their safeguard and their agreement. Yep, that same amount. The CNN's either too dumb or too dishonest to even acknowledge is the reality.

Starting point is 02:38:05 The point, though, is that what was going on right there is a fake debate about how you're the right one. No, you're the right one. You're both claiming Iran as a villain. You're both doing the same thing for Israel, whether you even realized or not. So I think it's important to highlight that fake back and forth where the partisan team wants to pretend the other partisan team hates them when they all fight. for the same things and I guess are too blind to see it. And I'm not talking about the majority. Guys, I'm talking about the partisan team sport game.

Starting point is 02:38:32 Back to the clip. They still have it. Yeah, and it's buried beneath a significant amount of rubble. And then they can take it out of there when they want to. Thanks to the United States military. So that's number one. So people were killed to accomplish that. Did Americans want that?

Starting point is 02:38:45 What I mean? Thanks to the U.S. military for something that nobody wanted that Trump said wouldn't happen that you swore you wouldn't do? Well done, Scott. Two. Don't mischaracterize what I said. After the, after the military. victory, they gave diplomacy a chance. And as the president said repeatedly, he always said,

Starting point is 02:39:01 I would like to have a deal. I'm prepared for them to not behave, in which case they get nothing. And we have to go back to a military option, which is where. Is that even even like a fraction of what we can even see happening? And you don't get pushed back from CNN. Like, you know how much you could rip apart. If I was in this room, it would rip him down, like lay out the information. Like how insane you could even say that. Here's 37 example. You know, go down. It's, that's pathetic. Again, same point. But the point I want to get to is right here. Where we are today, where it ends, I don't know. There hasn't been as much volatility in the oil market the last couple of days as some people might have projected, which is a good thing.

Starting point is 02:39:38 But I do think it's true that they are not interested in rational outcomes here. And this whole Iran is what we're talking about, despite them literally showing the most restraint that of anybody in the conversation, consistently standing and as not fighting or citing with Iran, guys, it's an objective fact, and you can literally prove it for yourself if you're not blinded by partisan objectives. And he just lies to you. I mean, Scott is a very dishonest. The whole threat to assassinate our president to say one of the proof that they are not interested in rational outcomes here. And this whole threat to assassinate our president.

Starting point is 02:40:12 Which is not even real, as far as I can tell. To say one other thing for all the people out there who've been crapping on our relationship with Israel and what we do with Israel and our alliance with Israel, they gave us intelligence to help us keep our president from being assassinated. That's a good thing. Oh, yeah, totally, totally, just because we're just going to blindly accept at face value that Israel was accurate or not making it up entirely or not the one threatening Trump in the same way. I mean, just, you know, however you read that, the idea that Israel said something, therefore we, that we could prove it right there. Israel said that, therefore they saved us and therefore they're a good ally. What a lazy argument. I mean, even if it's the accurate point, you know,

Starting point is 02:40:52 I'm just, if that's the best you can do, you've lost, guys. That's the point. They have lost. People see through that. I think you know that already. To everyone constantly criticizing our alliance with Israel, their intelligence just helped keep our president from being assassinated. I'd love to see even a shred of evidence about how that was even close to happening,

Starting point is 02:41:10 let alone the past examples you've already lied about. Embarrassing. Now, Trump tells the New York Post after this claim that Iran, if Iran assassinations him, this is like the third time he said this, by the way, in previous. iterations of the past. He says, I've left instructions to just literally bomb them at levels they've never seen him before. The past one, he said, what, was to destroy their civilization? Or what was it? Basically, the point is, all that can mean is killing innocent people, guys. So you've left instructions to murder innocent people should you be killed? Yeah,

Starting point is 02:41:41 no matter what you think about, if it actually happens or not, it makes you a bad person. It makes you a child. Murder everybody if you take me out. That's what dictators do. guys, that's the Samson option. That's Trump's Samson option right there. I've been on their list for a long time. That's what they're dealing with. Their only thing is they've left instructions, if anything happens.

Starting point is 02:42:01 I guess that's, I don't know, who knows if he believes it or not? It's just exhaustingly stupid, the whole thing. And of course, as Douglass O'Granger says, White House preparing for a prolonged flight conflict with Iran. Oh yeah, remember that whole thing about three days, or Charlie two weeks to flatten the curve? Iran will be in and out.

Starting point is 02:42:20 They welcome us like heroes. Iraq war lies over and over again. Are we still pretending like this is just an extension? Or did Democrats make this happen? Or what's the narrative in the partisanship? The reality is you got tricked into another war by the same government, left and right that always does this. And you guys bought it if you're a team's more player.

Starting point is 02:42:38 And we believe that he'll be in and out. And now he couldn't because they ham start, whatever. Whatever you fill in the blank with for why it didn't go the way he promised, it's always something. What do we say in the beginning? It won't be like that. It'll end up being a forever war that you promise wouldn't happen. No, because he's not the same.

Starting point is 02:42:53 People will just lie themselves into anything. I don't believe that's even close to the majority right now, but it's worth pointing out. Marjorie Taylor Green. Iran bombed ships going through the straits. By the way, they did it, as we said, for restraint or rather in deterrence for ships that were violating the agreement they made. Not even she can be honest about that, which matters to me. But it goes, so Trump bombs Iran, and oil prices start rising again, the stock market

Starting point is 02:43:19 goes down making buying opportunities ripe again. She's pointing out that there's a design to this, which we all see. Then Trump goes back to saying he bombed Iran because Iran cannot have a nuclear weapon, as if that's even tight. It repeats it at least 60 times the press today. She goes, I didn't realize Iran's nuclear program was in the Strait of Fremuz controlling oil. She makes a good point. Like, if all of it's centered around in Strait of Famos, what does it have to do with

Starting point is 02:43:41 the nuclear conversation? But it feels more like a post-9-11 Bush-era Middle East war lies and war economy politics than any real concern about Iran having a nuclear weapon, much like Iraq having new weapons of mass destruction, literally what we voted to end from the Republican Party. I just don't feel like I can take her seriously. I hope she falls through and I hope she consistently stands by these things, but I feel like she's just playing the role. But here are the people that support Trump, the one that he supports, the ones that he, she's

Starting point is 02:44:11 had Lumer on his plane like three or four times. Literally, she's been cited with giving insight. Things that she said came out of Trump's mouth. Here's what she posted, guys. Just don't get kicky she didn't see the people, the kind of filth that are on the side of this agenda. She goes, finish the job, Trump. And this is, of course, when this post comes out. Oh, wow, Iran bombing Iran.

Starting point is 02:44:32 And that's infrastructure. They're showing you right there. Literally civilian infrastructure. And as Trump says, this is the in repribution for yesterday's bombings of ships. Oh, again, the ships that were being pushed back because they were violating the straight, the agreement that you signed Trump so the question is is he too stupid to know that is he being lied to by Hegset or whatever else

Starting point is 02:44:51 or is he know what he's doing does he know he signed it and know he's lying and murder people anyway you can decide Lumer of course goes finish the job Trump purge your admin of the isolationist who tell you that Islam

Starting point is 02:45:06 Islam can be negotiated with as if that's just Iran we're talking about you can't negotiate with these animals gosh you don't disgusting. Now, you know what's crazy? This, I'm almost certain this says you can't negotiate with Muslims. And I believe she changed that. I could be wrong. That's why I pulled aside, quite frankly, but for some, I didn't take a screenshot, so I'll pretend like I could be wrong. But I'm telling you guys, on this platform, Pete, if you have inside connection, I've seen

Starting point is 02:45:36 on must change this stuff with no notation. Anyway, the bottom line is, these people are disgusting. And here is Mark Levin. Take down this. building, he writes. It's an apartment building. You can easily look it up. And it has a banner that says, we will kill Trump. So I said, no matter the justification, if you are calling for the bombing of a civilian hotel, which is what this is, full of Iranians, because of opinions they've expressed,

Starting point is 02:46:03 however insulting or threatening, you are an evil person. This may come as a shock, but when you murder their families, people get angry. I know it's crazy, right? Now, I'm not saying it to agree with the sentiment or that anyone should express the killing of an... Because your government is screaming about killing people. The bottom line is these are random people that Mullen or Levin wants you to just murder because they don't... They say, you know, it shows you that just like with Gaza or Lebanon, they're fighting the peoples. They're fighting Palestinians.

Starting point is 02:46:36 They're fighting Lebanese culture. They are fighting Iranians. Not the governments. They hate these people. And it's undeniably clear at this point. you know, as evidenced by their ethnic cleansing and genocide, but plenty of other things, too. Of course, Donald Trump comes out now and says, they're liars, they're cheats, they're sick people. They've hurt their people.

Starting point is 02:46:56 They've killed 54,000. And now it's 54,000. The lies. We went through that as it was happening and proved to you they were making this up. Proved to you who was being shot in the mass being flooded in as they admitted, they funded people with arms and created the, you know, even the Kurds, guys. They admitted to doing all this, but you know what this is you watch this show. The point is these made-up number, but what I'm highlighting is this now, now they're sick people need to be hurt. Didn't you just? Yeah, he did just say on the 16th.

Starting point is 02:47:25 He's never cared about Iran regime change claims new leaders are not radicalized. Literally discusses, no, they're good people. These people are good. They're not that bad. Very rare. He says leadership is very rational, not radicalized. Wait a minute. The same people you said, why?

Starting point is 02:47:42 Maybe because he thought he, maybe he thought he was going to get a job. Who knows? So the people that were not radicalized because we killed the bad ones are now evil monsters. And Pete, we killed the first ones and now they're just as bad. Well, wait a minute. I thought in the beginning you said you killed three different groups. You killed three different people. And now the new people, we don't even know who's in charge.

Starting point is 02:48:01 They're lying about literally everything. The same person's in charge that was right at the beginning. The son, the same one, the same leadership, the same government. This guy is just so desperate for a win. He wants you to think we already did regime change, right? As it, but I thought you said regime change wasn't what the goal was. Now you're using that as a metric to say you won? That's pretty pathetic.

Starting point is 02:48:23 More perfect union. The Defense Department from NBC News was funded with a budget of nearly a trillion dollars. But it's already running out of cash, according to three U.S. officials. Sure sounds like it's working out well, guys. Hashtag winning. Here's this is a Wall Street Journal article. To save money, maybe you should skip breakfast. Thanks, Empire. I mean, it's just beyond the pale, guys. Now, in case you didn't know, as of today,

Starting point is 02:48:52 Israel's still attacking Lebanon. It matters because that's a violation of the agreement. So there's never been a moment where they didn't violate this. And as of right now, the alleged ceasefire, which is separate from this, even before this conversation, there was supposed to be an alleged ceasefire, Israel's been bombing the entire time. Never stop. As Craig Murray's been highlighting and anybody on the ground, as of today, they are continuing to target innocent people on motorcycles, bombing certain locations, burning fields down. It's what they do every time. This is the ongoing genocide.

Starting point is 02:49:20 As Sarah Abdullah points out, Israel's burning forest and civilian homes in Lebanon, not military targets, houses, entire ecosystems, every time. Like by design, guys, this is what they do. We'll talk more about this in the next show, more about what's going on with Israel and Gaza. Israel wiping out entire families is so normalized that Amnesty International can publish this article on July 9th without any media coverage at all.

Starting point is 02:49:46 Here's the title. Israeli attacks killing children. Wiping out families must be investigated as war crimes. Lebanon. Crickets. Remember when that used to be a major story? Not anymore. Finally, the Ukraine war.

Starting point is 02:50:05 That's one of the ones Trump's ended, right? It's just like all the other lies. Didn't stop. It never really did. But he still uses that as a tally on his 30,000 wars he stopped or whatever he'll say tomorrow. And the point is, Trump says he supports Ukraine's long-range attacks inside of Russia.

Starting point is 02:50:20 Oh, that war he ended? Yeah. Continuing and escalating the proxy war in Ukraine, by the way, as Dave and myself and everybody with a brain told you what happened, escalating the Ukraine war is probably Trump's biggest betrayal of what he campaigned on. Yet you don't hear a peep about it.

Starting point is 02:50:36 He didn't end the war. He did successfully end Republican opposition to it, though. Wake up, guys. But yeah, don't you know, we're so back. That's what you get. A cartoon, guys. I mean, like, literally like a joke, like they're making fun of you. Like Israel is making fun of you.

Starting point is 02:50:58 We're so back, America. We're so back. We're so hot right now. You know things Trump actually says. This is the White House account. Do you feel like America is back? You guys can decide. Do you feel like we're where we should be in this country?

Starting point is 02:51:14 I don't believe anybody does. but we're back. I mean, we have never been more lost. At the same time, though, we've never had more of an opportunity for actual change. I say it every time. I really genuinely believe

Starting point is 02:51:30 we are in a moment where we have the potential if we choose to capitalize on it and overlook our partisan division and truly change this for the better. And if we don't do it now, they will capitalize on this opportunity and roll us into the new thing they're building. I'd like to believe we can make an opportunity,

Starting point is 02:51:45 in all this. Thank you for tuning in. I'll see you in the next show. I love you all. As always, question everything. Come to your own conclusions. Stay vigilant.

The Last American Vagabond - The Flock Revolution, ICE Continues Violating The Rights Of Americans & Trump Lies About Iran, Again

There aren't comments yet for this episode. Click on any sentence in the transcript to leave a comment.