The Last American Vagabond - The Israel Shaped Quantum Back Door & Trump's Iran Deal Predictably Spins Out

Starting point is 00:00:01 It starts with a simple question and ends an objective reality. Through our journey from there to hear, we find one another and ourselves. And as the next 24 hours breaks free from our last, we gaze onward in reflection of the day. Welcome to the Daily Wrapup. Monday, June 22nd, 2026. Thank you for joining me today. I apologize for the delay. Arnold's getting, I get tired of even having to bring stuff like this up,

Starting point is 00:00:50 but dealt with a lot of random things today. And weirdly enough, there's a lot I've been noticing on the back, you know, website changes, uh, terms of service updates, all kind of happening. You know, those things tend to kind of all weirdly develop in multiple sites, same time. I've seen a lot of that stuff and all at the same time today. over the last couple days, really, but today you had some website issues. I seriously have been ready to go live for probably the last hour. Been trying to like manage all these different issues.

Starting point is 00:01:17 But anyway, put it aside because you know what, it doesn't even matter. But as always, guys, you know, another Rumble bot trying to pretend to be us and steal your identity and all just every single level everywhere. It just shows you we're over the mark, guys. So too are a lot of people. I think a lot of people are seeing what's going on today. So thank you for tuning in today. We have a lot of important things to talk about.

Starting point is 00:01:35 following up, of course, on the Iran conversation. And really, just to start with the point, it's back where we were before. And we'll get to that. If you are interested in the day-to-day and information, I do think it's important. There's always a little bit of nuance in between. And I feel like there's a lot of different factors kind of trying to nudge their agenda forward. But we'll get into that. But the point is the same as it was before.

Starting point is 00:01:57 It's spun out again because the U.S. government is lying. I don't really see how anyone else can see any differently at this point. Or at least somebody's lying to them. but we'll get to that. But we're going to talk about a few other things today that I think are pretty important. I want to start with some election interference conversation. Even seeing the Columbia discussion going around, I'm sure if you haven't, we'll get into that. And I find it very relevant.

Starting point is 00:02:18 I mean, first you're going to see a lot of the people who usually take the typical stance, propagandist perspective, of saying, oh, my God, they're blaming Israel. I can't even believe it. You can't make this stuff up. You know, in one sense, you can argue that there's an overfocus, and there can be any way. or let's just even say there is just because it's so objectively obvious that Israel's involved with so many things going on that, yeah, you may get a little bit of an over, you know, that, well, maybe that too, and people will assume.

Starting point is 00:02:45 But what's crazy is of all the conversations, to talk about election interference and have Israel, their intelligence, whether spyware or straight up election manipulation, proudly telling you how well they do with that. And then having an issue where there is involvement that you can't deny of the U.S., is real plenty of different factors, but then getting into the end of the end of, actual, I mean, the former president himself, accusing them of manipulating the election, but that it would be pushed back on such a degree with a group that is, you know, it's like having a known murderer and being accused of murder and people going,

Starting point is 00:03:15 how dare you say that? What an outrageous claim? It's like, well, he is a murderer. You know, it's like that's, so it's interesting the response there. But we're going to go into that claim and just a general point about Columbia and why I think it's relevant and an overlap with USAID that I think is important to discuss and how this, you know, play. is a larger factor in this election manipulation conversation as it pertains to Colombia,

Starting point is 00:03:38 but also just a, you know, well, rather I said it backwards, a focal point, but also a larger connection to what I think is sort of an apparatus. It's not just Israel, but they play a major factor in that. But we're going to talk about that as it connects with a couple of other things as well, and that has to do with Trump's quantum conversation today. You might have seen his new executive order. This is not really a new conversation, but it's gotten a lot of attention today because of executive order. But I want to highlight why I think that's an important story. that relates to what Israel's doing in the world. Now, the way I framed it today is just sort of to give you an image.

Starting point is 00:04:08 The Israel-shaped quantum backdoor, not to necessarily suggest that we are backdoor in technology that's barely being developed, but the conversation of how Israel, I argue, is already setting itself up to be able to circumvent whatever may come next when it comes to quantum computing, quantum security, whatever we want to discuss. And I'm by far not an expert in the conversation. But I'll get into the National Defense Authorization Act and a few other points that already outline how the U.S. government is integrating Israel, whether it's 219 NDAA or not, or previous examples or the Senate, I forget the bill, the number, but all of which discussed

Starting point is 00:04:44 the integration of the Israeli military and intelligence with the U.S. But like I said, that's additional parts. That's already the case. And so if we already know that there is intertwining the integration of the two, and we'll get into the actual verbiage of the document where it's discussing this kind of quantum technology and showing that they're working on these things together. So if Israel is working in, like, behind the scenes with building the technology that they will then utilize and say they're going to make it so China can't invent.

Starting point is 00:05:16 Well, what about Israel? Which is going to be the premise of my point. And you will see that that's what's happening. I find that to be pretty damn alarming. And of course, we're going to talk about that with a couple points I want to get into around partisanship. I find a humorous. But of course, the larger point about Iran and,

Starting point is 00:05:31 where this goes. And actually, I will make a point about something, a few different things. Tim Dillon was one post that went out. Another thing from Tucker Carlson. Tim Dillon's post literally just says MAGA's debt. Maga is over is what he says. Well, interesting conversation seeing us how we've been talking about this, whatever it is, since January. I disagree with the point of what they're saying. And you know where I'm coming out already with this. But we'll get into that and we get down to it. I don't think MAGA. I think MAGA is what was caused the Republican version of it to be over. The reality that most Americans genuinely want the things they were promising, not the other way around.

Starting point is 00:06:05 And so what's dead, what's over is the illusory nature of the MAGA side of the political version of it and really just the larger government two-party illusion pressure. That's what I think. We'll get into that in a second. But let's start, of course, with the Israel election manipulation allegation. And one quick point about the Pfizer shots that we discussed in the last show that I wanted to highlight because RFK Jr. had a point about this. So this was the previous show, over $1 billion to Pfizer for new COVID shots.

Starting point is 00:06:31 Now, he commented on this. And I found this very interesting and also the people that responded to this. So he comes out and this was on the 18. And he says the claim that CDC has already spent $1.24 billion on COVID-19 vaccines are simply wrong. The contracts cited are indefinite delivery, indefinite quantity contracts put in place ahead of the season to ensure availability if needed. Okay. I mean, I guess that's a fair. correction. I mean, look, just to be clear, from what myself or any of the other people that are criticizing this are coming from is not that, you know, that buying them or not is the issue. It's not about money. It's about the idea that you're in any way even suggesting that you might

Starting point is 00:07:15 ultimately buy COVID-19 shots, let alone have a contract ready just in case you need them for the thing you told us you would stop. These are MRNA shots we're talking about, guys. I've already gone over a lot of these different things. And regardless of that in general, realize, and there are so many factors involved with the specifically COVID-19 shots, whether we're talking about the spike. I mean, to go into the entire conversation. If you're interested, there's a lot of work on this platform for you to check out. The point is that the issue is about the shot itself.

Starting point is 00:07:43 And so we came out this and said, this is insane to me, seeing as how they made an entire stand, you know, they built their entire Maha direction on the idea of this and built to other things, most of which they've, I think almost all of which they've double-crossed they're the real maha movement, not these fake people pretending to make America healthy again. But it says, HHS and CDC have not purchased COVID vaccines for the upcoming respiratory season and have made no decisions regarding future purchases. Okay, but you put the contracts out just in case you might need them. So let's just even take that at face value. Frankly, I do not agree with this. It's how I can already prove to you that they've invested

Starting point is 00:08:17 in Arctur. I mean, I've gone through these. Arcturis amplitude, multiple versions of COVID shot they're working on right now, both self-amplifying, which he himself. has admitted are happening. And of course, I should have just grabbed it first, but I'll grab that episode in case you want to look at it later, because that's the real point. It leaned into self-amplifying while claiming to end COVID-19 shots. But so he, now, what the point again is that him trying to kind of distance himself from the idea that they bought him. Well, we're concerned with the fact that you're even pretending like they're acceptable for children or anybody, for that matter. But he says, ID IQ contracts allowing for future orders are not the same as spending taxpayer dollars. Well,

Starting point is 00:08:53 okay, fair. But the issue was not about whether they were bought, but that it's still happening. On top of the fact that there's numerous examples of other shots we could discuss. Jicky leaks, though, rightly points out, yeah, I know you found the receipt for that secret hotel room I paid for next week, but I wasn't going to actually use it, honestly. You know, that's essentially, okay, well, we're not concerned. It's about the idea that you bought the dangerous thing or even protect, but got ready to buy it. When you get the point, guys. So, you know, this is the same thing we're getting from Trump and Iran right now. well you know everybody has a right to ballistic missiles so we can't just not let them yeah trump that's what we've all been saying well you were screaming that they can't be allowed because they're terrorists

Starting point is 00:09:31 and now you come at us with the same rational regard that okay well that and then we're supposed to go oh good then he agrees no no the reality would be that either you were you know there's no honesty in that right if you were trying to tell us they shouldn't have in the first place then you're telling them now they should means that you're lying then or you're lying now and nothing needs anything and so for RFK Jr. to make this deviate, I guess this nuanced point about it, it ultimately tries to hide the fact that they are in fact still leaning in to COVID-19 shots. And that's very frustrating. As well as Sasha Latapova says, so why did you sign the contract then, which he did? Can I have an ID IQ contract from you for $1.2 billion to deliver an anti-unicorn spray?

Starting point is 00:10:15 A pandemic of unicorns could be deadly. You know, we must be. The point they're calling is bluff, guys, and I agree. I think it's a silly argument, especially since we can see they are, in fact, doing that. They're just trying to cover themselves politically. Just in case you want to see that, guys, because I wasn't aware that he had commented on that. Now, getting into the Columbia conversation, and that was the other part of that shows title, the election interference from Israel, the allegation being that Israel interfered in this election. Drop site news posted, this is the post from the Columbia election. We recognize that a pre-count as data that is still not official or binding. We acknowledge its first result, but we must report that our group of witnesses

Starting point is 00:10:51 is proceeding to challenge 33,000 polling stations across the country. What I find so interesting about this is, you know who I see giving the most pushback? I lost my highlighting there. Are the very people who are otherwise standing out there telling you how you should challenge, still currently challenging 2020, not even to suggest there should not challenges be made. But what's crazy to me is how quick people are to make every, every election fraudulent when the guy you don't want wins. And then those same people then push back. And then on the allegation of fraud before we even find out because that's the team. I'm not talking about everybody, not even the majority.

Starting point is 00:11:23 The team sport players that are clearly pro is real, not pro America, and a little bit of an overlap in there. But they exist and there are a lot of them. And that's the kind of commentary class you see right now all over Twitter who aren't actually genuine, don't really care about the outcome or the facts. But they're getting millions of views and millions of shares. That's this platform and the illusory nature of it. The reality, though, is that it is something being, the accusation is being thrown,

Starting point is 00:11:47 and the people you'd expect to be the first to go, yeah, yeah, we're all about election, fraud, and uncovering it are the first to go, nope, not when Israel's accused or not when it's something Trump wants. And again, I don't even think that's the real MAGA movement. I think that's people that are siding with the government, not people that are siding with the country, if you may, if you understand my difference. Colombian president, Gustavo Petro has alleged that Israel interfered in Colombia's presidential election, citing alleged irregularities in the country's vote, counting process and calling for a full audit and recount. With prelaboration, with prelaboration, preliminary results showing 49.3 versus 49%. Petro noted that neither candidate can be declared president

Starting point is 00:12:23 until the official scrutiny process is completed, which under Columbia's electoral system determines the final result. He cited changes to the National Registry's server IP addresses, which he said indicate the electoral software may have been compromised. All these things are similar kind of claims we've heard in the past of other elections. The point is, if anybody cares about this stuff, we should damn well find out, shouldn't we? Mark my words, what you're going to get are people are on the side of whoever the people that want to defend Israel because they did this or even because they're being accused of it are going to be the ones that will ignore any of the evidence. And it'll be the people like Trump, for example. That's what I'm expecting. The same thing I did with Honduras and any number of other

Starting point is 00:12:59 examples where it's such like insultingly obvious fraud and corruption and they just yell some, you know, political manipulation and just force in the person they want and pardon the criminal and whatever else. Literally the most hypocritical things they could possibly do while talking about going after, you know, illegal immigration and drug trafficking and then just, all of that when it comes to your interests. I'm telling you guys, this is why Americans are seeing through these people right now. He cited changes to the National Registry's server IP addresses. And again, this is not my opinion.

Starting point is 00:13:28 If you look into the reality of spyware and this kind of stuff, whether it's about internal surveillance spyware or exactly this, election manipulation, Israel is the leading element in the world as far as I can tell. And I'll get into that again in the second, just briefly. Petro claimed that the only entity in the world capable of carrying out an alleged cyber interference is the state of Israel. Now, the way that's framed, I don't get the sense he's saying the only one anywhere capable of doing that is Israel, but rather that I agree with this. And I've made this same argument going back years because of Israel's own statements about their capabilities.

Starting point is 00:14:00 And that should be questioned, right? You can clearly see the IDF is not what they've been told with. Clearly, they're not the best military in the world that we're told, as they can barely tie their shoes without the help of the United States. but overall, that that is what they're arguing, and you've seen the real-world examples of that. So he's arguing that that's the one, the technological footprint seems to match. His remarks come just weeks after French authorities link the Israeli firm, as you know, Black Corps, to digital interference campaigns targeting elections all over France, Scotland, New York City.

Starting point is 00:14:31 And this is just the latest allegation. It's not even an allegation. These are at, Black Corps is a group that is caught manipulating elections. The argument is that it's directly tied back to Israel. and you can prove that. Same with, we'll get into the major story. I'll get you in a second that the Guardian covered. This goes back decade ago.

Starting point is 00:14:49 Petro alleged several additional irregularities in post on Twitter, including lawyers being blocked from entering the main vote counting center. Can you only imagine what the certain people in the room would be saying if it was something they were fighting for? Unsigned E-14 polling forums being uploaded by election authorities, called for an independent forensic audit, and all the stuff we're used to. So if you don't remember, this is actually in the show, we presiding right at the beginning, we talked about Black Corps, Israeli firm, this is Heretz,

Starting point is 00:15:16 the Israeli platform, suspected of meddling in New York City, Scotland, elections, French. I mean, every one of these locations are saying, that's what they happen, and they're accusing them of doing so. And this is an Israeli firm tied to Israeli intelligence. It's not a secret. This is not a new conversation. Anybody with any honesty and awareness of history is aware that Israel has done this over and over and over. And that's, by the way, we're going to get into in a minute, part of why this is happening in South America, and we'll get into the, we'll really, to be honest about this, if you look around the world, anywhere Israel or the United States are capable of doing so, they have tried to remove a leader and put someone in place that's amenable to their agenda.

Starting point is 00:15:50 Not America's agenda, not even Israel's agenda, but their agenda, whatever that is in the moment. Now, just interestingly, to consider the possibility before we get into the larger point. Now, I want to be clear, right now this is an allegation. This is something, I think it's very obvious that this is something they're capable of, and I would argue something they absolutely would be trying to accomplish, but whether or not it's provably Israel that did this or manipulated it, that's up in the air. Just to make sure that's clear because that's right now what you're going to get is a lot of allegations.

Starting point is 00:16:17 And there's a lot of evidence that suggests that. But it's still being kind of flushed out. We do not support genocides. Gustavo Petro says in January 2025, the Palestinian Solidarity Movement and political backlash in Colombia, an entire study done on how much pushback he's getting for citing with Palestinians. Colombia breaks diplomatic ties with Israel. President calls actions in Gaza a genocide. That was 2024.

Starting point is 00:16:39 It's actually before. Here is, but I brief, international. But I brief, international strongly condemns the continued anti-Jewish statements, which they weren't. They were simply calling out Israel's genocide. You can look for yourself by Colombian president, Gustavo Petro. So as usual, how dare you call out the genocide we're committing? You hate Jews.

Starting point is 00:16:58 And of course, this becomes a problem for people who are calling out the genocide. If you're in a position of influential power, especially with Columbia, who is before all this, are ostensibly a U.S. ally, are, you know, getting, shoved off the world stage. This one from 26, June this month. Five ways Colombia's president is spreading anti-Semitism and destroying his nation's ties

Starting point is 00:17:19 with the U.S. and Israel. Clearly they wanted to get this guy out of the way. So consider that. Here's an interesting post for Max Blumenthal about the election system itself and how this seems to be one part of a large system designed to manipulate this very election, but largely I would argue this is the kind of thing.

Starting point is 00:17:36 I'll show you really quickly. I put that right here. we've talked about this is what this looks like this kind of slow boil infiltration technological you know where you get you get the technical framework or and even starting with putting in somebody in power that you ultimately want not necessarily the president right somebody who can be on the inside to manipulate things that direction to the point to where you hire this company if you want to watch the show again it's called the israeli election interference and psychological operation industrial complex it's it's not just election these guys are paid to do psychological operations

Starting point is 00:18:06 this is insane guys and this has been this was covered this was 24 I think the research, and this was done over the year before that. This is an Israeli asset who literally bragged about manipulating presidential elections, some of which were in the United States. It's all huge. This was multiple, I think it was the guardian like LeMonday and like large, it was a huge investigation, taking with a grain of salt like anything. The point, though, is that this is what we're talking about,

Starting point is 00:18:28 is this kind of, you know, like the voting machine example would be one part of something like this, right? Then you would have the media apparatus. Like we're talking about building out something like that. Here is one aspect of this that Max is discussing. Here's what Gustavo Petro wrote. This was from June 21st, 2026. I wanted that, I warned that the software, the Bautista brothers, was vulnerable,

Starting point is 00:18:53 according to the 2018 Council of State ruling, and that it should be replaced with public software. So meaning he was calling this out in 2018 about this very software being the weak link, and this is always how this tends to go. And usually it's something where they'll have, like, not to say this is that, but you'll have an Israeli type company that works with the U.S. government, and that becomes the one that gets hacked? And it's like, well, was it hacked or is that just the cover? But either way, the timing is interesting and how far back it's going.

Starting point is 00:19:17 We have evidence of IP addresses of several servers of the National Registry. This means the software was compromised and others wrote data for polling stations and voting posts. The only entity in the world capable of doing that is the state of Israel. Now, I don't know if I agree with that. And this is a translation. So you could take that for what you will. I think that ultimately the argument is that the one capable of doing what they saw, but I'm not trying to interpret what he isn't suggesting.

Starting point is 00:19:41 Very well may argue that he thinks only one of the world, but see, that would mean the U.S. couldn't. I don't think he even believes that. So that's why I'm saying that. But either way, you could take it for what you will. Here's what Max added to it. The Batista brothers are convicted fraudsters who own the private offshore company that manages Colombia's voting software.

Starting point is 00:19:59 That sure seems on the up and up. Imagine if that was happening in this country, it was owned by some El Salvadorian company. clearly you would be concerned. Their company botched Colombian elections in 2014, 2022, when 400,000 votes by four Petro's party just went missing. Before any official tally, Trump and Israel-backed de la Esperia only leads by 250,000 votes. Now, already we've seen, I think it was Rubio

Starting point is 00:20:24 and somebody other like congratulating the adversarial element before we even have the final tally. So arguably suggesting that's something that they, are no ahead of time is the statement being made. Here's the clip. Camillo-Bautista Palacio is one of two brothers who own the firm in charge of the election software and counting tally in Colombia. As a young man, he was sentenced to nine years for bank fraud, but wound up serving less than three years in prison. He's presided over fictitious inventories, forged bills, loans totaling 130 million obtained through falsified documents and a $500,000

Starting point is 00:21:01 bribe in order to facilitate a loan. Today, he and his brother, the Batista brothers, manage Colombia's passport and electoral systems. Going into the election, the Colombian electoral system was tainted with bias and corruption. Hernan Panagos, the chair of the electoral authority, happens to have deep ties to the country's conservative forces and now stands accused of fabricating 800,000 votes out of thin air. Well, I find it very relevant and interesting, especially with what's going on in the world today. But as always, consider it. It's not always one thing. But I think what's fascinating is that the timing of this is very relevant with the larger conversation that we've been discussing.

Starting point is 00:21:43 And you'll see more of that in a second when the argument becomes how USAID somehow allowed them to take Republican, you know, I guess mindset to take over all of South America when the comparative point is, well, that's actually the lens to see pro Israel. And you'll see what I mean. But first here is an example. There's money even going around. Again, it's hard to know. what's genuine these days, especially, I mean, these are people, they are protesting. That's clear. But to know whether that represents the majority or not, you know, always be skeptical and just see it for what it is, one data point. But at this hour, this is from yesterday, thousands of people are marching in Bogota, in defense of life and against a possible electoral fraud, they want to

Starting point is 00:22:22 gut us and the people will not be silenced. So right now with the concern about what America's going through, watching and calling out the reality that Israel is unquestionably manipulating U.S. if not controlling it. The whole world sees this, and most of America's calling it out, despite all the shrill screams of the people that don't want to talk about it or call you races for considering the obvious nature of it, you got stuff like this happening in other parts of the world, and they're seeing it. Then you got Gustavo saying, this is Israel. I just find that to be undeniable, the relevance of it, but maybe he's saying that to get that attention. That would be a pretty wise political move, to be honest, even if it was dishonest.

Starting point is 00:22:58 But we'll find it that, we'll watch it as it goes forward, see what happens. I think what statements get made will say a lot. If Trump stands up and sides with whoever the Israel side leans into or rather even not about Israel, just make it about the fact that if there's a political side that leans in with the larger agenda and they seem to just go with that regardless of the facts, that would say a lot.

Starting point is 00:23:18 So I guess we'll find out. Now, you know, Paulina Luna points this out yesterday, right on the same time frame, right? Remember, Columbia's right there. It says the Secretary of Rubio effect. So, this is because of Mark of Rubio, I guess. Once he cut off the corrupt USAID slush funds, look what happened. Now, do we really, actually, I should have grabbed my show on that, but do we really have to keep, you know, this is what's it's so exhausting with all of this.

Starting point is 00:23:45 This game of just, you know, lying over and over. Now, sometimes you wonder, do I need to do that? Do most people, are most people smart enough to already recognize USAID didn't actually close? The USAID shell game that it was actually just, you know, diminished at least on paper and move. done to the State Department, which is what it really always was. Who's to say that all the stuff they removed and diminished and just pop up on some unknown ledger we don't see? Like, it's just this blind trust for the government.

Starting point is 00:24:10 It's insane with people telling you you're fighting the government. It's baffling sometimes. But the reality is ultimately that USAID is still present. And I'll prove that to you like I have before. But so that's a secondary point. I think it's interesting. Really the point about USAID is to see that for what it is. an illusory thing about hiding it, saying it's gone. But what happened is it just got moved and the

Starting point is 00:24:35 agenda did not stop. Even the foreign assistance argument, I'll show you that as well. So why would they want to kind of couch that or hide it or, you know, remove your awareness of the fact that was still happening? Because this is what it's always been. USAID, National Delft Democracy. These are regime change engines, as Corbett has called them. So here we are, watching it do the same thing. But you see, they want you to think that's only Democrats and the slush fund and it's all about woke ideology. No, no, no, no, it was another narrative for doing the same regime change authoritarian tactics. They just love to play both sides with different narratives.

Starting point is 00:25:07 So here she is going, once he cut off the slush funds, which both sides have always used for the same purpose. So you can see why that's a dumb argument to make it about Democrats. And anyway, go down the rabiddle. Ask yourself, why? What's the interest of them only having those countries on the Democrat side and that country, on the Republican side? What does it even have anything to do with anything?

Starting point is 00:25:27 Why would that matter for U.S. politics? They're playing everybody. Got to wake past that. Now, what she's saying is June 2023, left wing, like that even relates the same way to U.S. politics. I'm so tired of this game. Right wing. Three, 10, okay, June 2026. And the point is, look at how much more right wing is there now.

Starting point is 00:25:44 That's what she's doing. Okay, sure. I guess. I mean, the argument then being that because you stopped funding them towards woke policies that suddenly a rush of like, I guess, of, the U.S. perspective, Republican-minded governments popped up. I guess that's sure just one casual, convenient way to frame that. Or you can consider that it's something else.

Starting point is 00:26:11 As Ryan Rosbiani points out, South America 2022 versus South America, 26. Same graph. Now, when you look, if you dive into it, what you're going to find, and he is correct. And you know what? Maybe it's just because there's an overlap. And the Republican-minded governments just happen to also be blindly pro-Isbris. Israel. You wouldn't, you wouldn't shock me. But what you're going to find is in each one of these locations, you're going to find the change becomes a mindlessly pro-Israel government that listens

Starting point is 00:26:36 to whatever they're told by US and Israel. I mean, it's always that way. So maybe they're overlapped, but what you can't deny is that the thing that Rubio did, if that's what she's pointing to, is push a bunch of pro-Israel governments in places in the locations that he changed, I guess, you know, whatever you want to argue he did. To me, I find that very hard to miss, especially with us being told that Rubio is going to be the next president, apparently, as he acts like he's angry with the Iran deal or whatever they're doing right now. So as Max Blument also points out, and the same thing that she pointed out here with the map, well, he says USAID, and this is important, guys, because this is the point about the nonpartisan version of how this actually plays out.

Starting point is 00:27:15 USAID under both Trump and Biden, or rather really, you know, going back on any administration it was used. in this case, USAID served as a slush fund for Juan Guido. The reason I said that is because his, whatever he was, goes back quite a while, not just when you saw him, but the slush fund for Juan Guido during Trump ain't Rubio's first coup attempt in Venezuela. Not just Democrat, but during Trump's term where they used it to fund what regime change? Finance Cuba and Rick Araugra's right-wing opposition and provided cover for CIA torturers running Operation Condor.

Starting point is 00:27:46 What the hell is this person talking about? to see that's my point is what they're trying to do is go look look what we did and u s the idea is a lie that didn't actually happen the way they framed it did what they want you to think is that we stop the democrats and all of a sudden republicans are winning everywhere like this is literally the tired hashtag winning narrative it's not even really connected with anything tangible and on top of that it's not even actually the reality and so what he's trying to show you here like we've been telling you is that this is something both sides use and trump used it just like anybody else did so to stop the slush fund all it really was is a recalibration of what they want you to see.

Starting point is 00:28:20 And they move funds in different directions. And let me prove that to you. I showed you this then, February 3rd, 2025. Secretary Marco Rubio appointed as acting administrator for USAID, the thing they allegedly closed down. Like, the only one that ever said it was closed down or shuttered or whatever the terms they were using were either blindly stupid people that followed other dumb people or people that were dishonest and then people followed them too.

Starting point is 00:28:46 Shouldn't even mean like that. The point is that it was, I get so frustrated with documents you can read that say the opposite of what people then point to when they go, that, look, they ended COVID shots. And I'm like, did you read the document? It's right there in paragraph four where it goes, except these COVID shots. But nobody wanted to read that. Apparently, I shouldn't say that. All you guys did.

Starting point is 00:29:03 But in the mainstream. But the idea is that he took over, right? Okay. Then you could say maybe it was only in the interim until they ended up finally shutting it down. That's what they really wanted you to think. But you can read through it and understand clearly that it simply didn't go away right then. okay let's keep going this is from september 4th 2025 rubio said u s a idea officially closeout mode oh wow it took a while for that to be officially in a closeout mode so let's just you know here is the

Starting point is 00:29:30 february okay now september okay guy just just took a long time to i guess start to shut the doors down well no the reality is the remaining programs read the whole thing if you want to do an article the remaining programs would be administered more effectively not go away but just effective whatever that means in a Republican mindset. Under the State Department, Rubio said. Right. So the remaining programs, which you can read for yourself, even though they did, they argue they cut 83% of programs. And I'm telling you right now, if you do your due diligence, you will find these programs

Starting point is 00:30:01 popping up in other things. Or just the idea that they don't necessarily need that arm anymore to effectively to do something they can now do through some technocratic arm. Either way, they did not officially get rid of, even in particular for foreign financing or foreign assistance, which is what they focus on, but it said more effectively. So that means Rubio is now, or whoever's in that position, using USDAID regime change engine for their purposes, which is the point. Here, June 2nd, 2026.

Starting point is 00:30:30 I'll just show you a couple standout parts of this. We have made it clear to every government, and this is Secretary of State Marker Rubio, statement before the Senate committee, and this is specifically on this conversation. We have made it clear to every government in this hemisphere that America can't and either be your greatest friend or most feared enemy. Sounds familiar, right? You are the... Wait, those are you against us.

Starting point is 00:30:51 The choice is yours. That's what it says. The choice is theirs. That's like mafia stuff, right? You're either our best friend or we're going to take you out. That's what they're doing, guys. That's not a good... That's not...

Starting point is 00:31:01 That is an evil tactic. That's a bad guy tactic. That's the kind of stuff that they would frame as bad. If anybody else did it to them. It's not about all or nothing. You take this or we go after you. It's about making compromise or conversation or agreements. at least as they would frame it for the way the world operates under government.

Starting point is 00:31:18 I'd like to find a world without it. Either way, what they're trying to do is say you have to choose sides all the time. And as they're out there committing genocide, raping and robbing and stealing, and they go either join us or we're going to bomb you. That's what they're doing right there. The whole world sees that at this point, guys. That's why this is collapsing. But cooperation with the United States on questions that concern our interest

Starting point is 00:31:39 is not optional, right? Cooperation with the United States on questions that concern our interest, optional, right? So I mean, you do what we want for us or you get out of here. Now, you can argue that's the way it works, but then that's isolation. That means we are only, only you act in our interests or you're not allowed to be at the table. And then they decide what the table is and who sits there. So at some point, you have to realize that the U.S. government is turning what they want into what everybody else has to do. That's pretty clear. We have used our trade relationships, our financial leverage, and our diplomatic standing to bring the nations of Central and South

Starting point is 00:32:10 America into alignment with our priorities. What do you think that means? We, we have have used our financial leverage. We've, we've sanctioned, we've manipulated using our financial power, our diplomatic standing. They're saying we have muscled these countries into doing what we want. And through them is Israel acting, as we all should be able to see by now. And now they are active partners in the work of intercepting illegal migration, dismantling cartel networks and accepting back their own nationals. And who is that exactly? The person you were legally kidnapped and installed the next person in line, even though it's not an election, that's not democracy, put somebody Delsey Rodriguez in power, many of the other countries do not align with what you're

Starting point is 00:32:49 saying. The overall point there's getting at here is that we force them into doing what we want for the area. And now they're, now they're allies. And most of the stuff they're doing is not supported by the peoples of those nations like a lot of the Middle East because of what they're doing with their normalization deals. But it goes, we also carried out the most ambitious, comprehensive, and successful reorganization in the history of the department. Reorganization. We consolidated offices, eliminated redundant, and cumbers, bureaucracy, and they really did not, by the way. This is one of the most cumbersome, bureaucratically controlled. I mean, it's just sad that people will take what they say and repeat

Starting point is 00:33:24 it like it's fact when you can look for yourself and realize it's not even close to what they're saying. That's what they're like this administration more than any in history seems to be known for that. You know, we won seven to zero and you look and it's like, well, you lost zero to seven. Miller, what are you doing? That was the first example stood out to me when he did that. So I always mention it. I'm like, am I wrong? Like, I just came back and go like, am I confused? Like, why would he just yell that when you know you could look? Well, here we are. 30,000 examples later.

Starting point is 00:33:49 We restore discipline and unity to the purpose of the department's voice and mission in the world. To the point, we transform the way we do foreign aid. Ah, you didn't stop it. We transform the way we do foreign aid. The whole point was no more of foreign aid. That's what they were screaming. Programs that failed to advance American interests were ended. Oh, I see.

Starting point is 00:34:08 So you're okay with foreign assistance as long as you get what you want from it. Well, yeah, guys, that's just U.S. foreign policy. That's always been the case. All they're trying to do now is make it framed as sort of the rational team is in charge. So now we're only going to do the thing that we said we were going to do when it's in our interest. That's exactly the Democrats did. It's exactly what the U.S. government always does. It's just a narrative change, guys.

Starting point is 00:34:27 USAID's old model was replaced. Not really. The foreign assistance that remains, and it does remain, is being brought under the strategic direction of the State Department, where it belongs. And by the way, if you're not blind, is pretty much where it's always been. And every dollar we spend today is 100 times more effective. efficient and align with the American interest, whatever that means to them, but apparently what Israel tells them it means.

Starting point is 00:34:48 And when Trump took office, foreign aid properly understood as a valuable tool, a key instrument of statecraft, all they're saying is foreign aid can be used to manipulate countries into our interests. That's what they're saying. And it doesn't mean foreign aid that we give them in hopes they do what we want. It means that you get them in a position where they then become dependent on it, and then you yank the rug out and they basically make them do what you want. And this is classically documented.

Starting point is 00:35:12 you take over a country, you force them to only produce what you want them to produce for you, then they become entirely dependent on exporting everything, rather importing everything they need for their own survival from you. And the moment that they need to do something that you don't want, well, you can yank that rug out and they have to do what they. This is as documented as anything can be. It is what they've always done. Left and right, it's what they do.

Starting point is 00:35:38 It's been books written about this. And so that's what he's saying. but every dollar of our assistance must make America safer, stronger, or more prosperous. This was the guiding principle of our reform. It must serve the American interest, none of which they're doing does, by the way. Or this should not be paid more by the American people. Well, first of all, interesting point you made. I don't disagree with the idea of having, you know,

Starting point is 00:35:57 it should be mindlessly just throwing money at things that aren't in the interests of Americans. However, depends on how you look at this. If you're looking at this like something as charity, which I don't think it should be in the context of a government, but that would mean that you wouldn't do it with some, expected return. That is how some people look at it, that we should be helping people. I mean, I agree with the general sentiment. I don't believe the government should be the one doling out fund because this is what happens. So it should be individual choice. We should be

Starting point is 00:36:23 deciding how we want to do things as individuals. But either way, the point would be made that this is something they're turning into a coercive measure, which kind of defeat the purpose of what they claim they're doing. But that's government for you, isn't it? Lastly, it says it contains billions of dollars in investments in a revolutionized approach to foreign assistance. Yeah, So just not stopping the exact same dynamic. Just telling you we're doing it so much better. We're going to do gain of function better than anybody. We're going to do glyphosate better than anybody.

Starting point is 00:36:51 No Democrat glyphosate. No gain of function Democrat stuff. We're going to do the good stuff. That's what they do. How lazy and stupid, guys, because yeah, we still have glyphosate. The leading in the world, apparently. We still have gain of function, just the safe versions of it, Trump will tell you. Everything.

Starting point is 00:37:05 COVID shots. Self-implifying. Don't worry. It's the good Republican side. I'm just tired of that. I'm hoping you're getting tired of it too. This is important show to understand the kind of depth and how long this has been happening. Oh, sorry, I bumped that, the play button there.

Starting point is 00:37:22 It's just, it's very, it goes on a long, it's around the world, guys. And I think what we're watching right now is Israel's effort to kind of force in the last leg of this, and they're failing because people see it. Hopefully, it's not pushed over the edge by the other countries they seem to dictate. But we talked about Honduras Gate. I'm actually kind of blown away how this has gotten so little attention. Not just the real, the conversation of what this is, but the idea that this very investigation, Hondurasgate,

Starting point is 00:37:48 look it up, watch the show itself, is audio recordings of Trump and Israel literally discussing how they'd get Wanda Hernandez in power, pardon him of his crimes that they knew he was great. It's very clear. It's documented. You don't even need these audio recordings to understand how criminal this was, but this just lays out what they do,

Starting point is 00:38:06 and it's completely forensic. nobody seems to talk about it. Blows me away. I'm sure we'll bring it up again at some point. And the plan about the network state, you know, it's all in there, guys. But it shows you Israel dictating elections and foreign policy. Do we need to talk about APEC and Thomas Massey? Doesn't get much more clear than that, guys.

Starting point is 00:38:25 It was on the surface funding this person over that one and pushing somebody who is pro-Israel versus somebody's not. You couldn't hide from that. Here we are. Now, whatever Massey does going forward will say a lot about whether that was part of something or not, but it doesn't change the fact that A-PAC can so blatantly in the middle of something, not fund the guys who you like their policy, but like in the middle of the fight going, this guy, this guy, fund that guy, here's $10, here's $100, like driving people into position.

Starting point is 00:38:52 That's not how lobbying is supposed to work, you understand. That's election interference is what they're doing. Trump releases White House app with dangerous spyware, Israeli spyware is quiet, comeback under Trump, 2026. All this stuff are, these are real public. of her mainstream covered conversations. It just never gets put together. This massive kaleidoscope of just Israel manipulation and murder and genocide and people

Starting point is 00:39:16 just look at it fragmented. Oh, that's one firm. Oh, that's one company. You know, maybe. But at the end of the day, the picture is undeniable, guys. Israel around the world is the leader in all of this. And it's pretty well documented. This is an app they put out that was just as compromised.

Starting point is 00:39:30 We have the conversation of the telemessage app that's an Israeli intelligence entity that literally was anyway and probably still is. archiving messages from Signal in the middle of the Oval Office because walls. He was doing that. And he got, now he's the ambassador, apparently. She's got quietly shoved aside. Signalgate got all the conversation, not the reality of what it really was. Meet the spyware companies preparing to unleash their tech in Trump's second term.

Starting point is 00:39:56 Derek told you this was coming. 2024. And this is NSO group, Pegasus, some of the most nefariously guilt. I mean, companies that have been caught for manipulating. U.S. politicians, journalists, hacking WhatsApp, I mean, any number of, like, on the surface, criminal acts. And yet Trump gives them a contract with the U.S. government, working with Talentere. No big deal.

Starting point is 00:40:20 Everything we've been warning about. This goes back to 2021. Whitney wrote this for TLAB. Another mega group spy scandal. What is it? Samanage, sabotage, and other solar winds hack and all this stuff continues. This is the larger point about something where Israel gets involved with a company, and that company gets hacked.

Starting point is 00:40:36 and it sort of becomes this, was that the problem? Or was that, you know, were they just demonstrating their weakness? Now, the military aspect you guys all know. The new NDAA further integrates the U.S. and Israeli militaries. And I think that's a very problematic reality for where we are. You probably saw this going around. Just showing you this kind of either shocking level of incompetence or deliberate incompetence to cover criminality.

Starting point is 00:41:02 Photo posted by the Prime Minister of Qatar. You're sitting right there. Mohammed bin, what is it, Abdul Raham, bin Jaseem al-Tunni, alongside U.S. Vice President J.D. Vance and President Trump's son-in-law, Jared Kushner, as fragile peace negotiations with Iran appear to be continuing. This was on the 21st. Now, what you'll notice is Vance, the Vice President of the United States, on his computer with clearance with the Qatari minister, overlooking shoulder with Jared Kushner watching what he's doing. Now, what's picked up by a lot of people is, which I'm pretty certain, that's not Laura Lumer, by the way, which is what people, somebody altered the picture, I think, to make it look more like her. Who knows? The end of the day, the idea of that Lomor would even have a security clearance card would be insane. The point is that whoever it is, it's not J.D. Vance.

Starting point is 00:41:50 So it says the person on that CAC doesn't actually look like Vance. Somebody clearly failed their annual cyber awareness training. Now, this is gone around, guys. and all they're showing is either this is them, Vance is just utter stupidity or incompetence, or this is the, I argue, the incompetence that is meant to cover the criminality. You're allowing access.

Starting point is 00:42:08 So if ultimately comes down to being caught like this, you can go, oh, well, I just, I made a mistake. They'd always be rather be seen as incompetent than criminal, in my opinion. But the bigger point, why, we, why, so they're accessing something with these clearance, why is J.D., why is Kushner, and on a non-governmental appointee sitting there staring over his shoulder? But either way, it just speaks to some larger kind of either by through incompetence,

Starting point is 00:42:35 some sort of backdoor manipulation of this government or that this is by, you know, deliberate action. I think it's a little bit of both, quite frankly, because that's insane to me. I'll include the recent discussion. The obvious Israeli infiltration of the U.S. government is now acceptable to acknowledge, which I'm sure we've all seen suddenly, ask why that is. But maybe it's genuinely because there is some kind of a split. one of my thoughts is that there is a line eventually where no matter how compromise people are in this government

Starting point is 00:43:01 that they recognize they're losing everything either way. So you take the ire of the Israeli government, you hope they don't expose your Epstein criminal activity and you double down with what the U.S. people want. I mean, at some point there has to be a line, right? I'm not sure whether that's the case or this is about some sort of trying, you know, allowing us to say it, release valves.

Starting point is 00:43:20 So we have to be questioning all that right now. but what is important is that everyone is talking about this. I mean, it's on the mainstream media, guys. It's not some secret. That's what's, but still you get people that act like you're somehow racist. This is one of the craziest things to me right now. There's plenty of people out there we could name, but I'm not going to. The point is there's tons of people who are still like tiptoeing around anything that even points to Israel.

Starting point is 00:43:46 And it's very conspicuous, guys, because there's no denying that Israel's involved. to just to claim that somehow I pointing to Israel's involvement in something, it's somehow means you're anti-Semitic. Are they not able or capable of being involved in governmental manipulations? It's just a baffling level of willful ignorance. And the whole, you know, you could talk about the, you know, the AI direction, right? You could talk about any number of, you know, the Trump and AI agendas and the different obvious examples of Israel being intertwined in that, the technocratic discussion.

Starting point is 00:44:19 I mean, you name it right now. Israel is playing a role. And yet you have people out there who are desperately trying to avoid that, you know, acting like right now because there's some kind of an argument being played out in front of us that everyone's saying Israel is in control on the U.S. government suddenly stupid. It's like that has got to be some of the weakest argument I've ever seen out there. First of all, because most people that are doing this right now are not just all or nothing about it, which is what they love to make you look like.

Starting point is 00:44:43 So does Israel control everything? Like, who's saying that outside of people who are making an abstract argument like you're doing in reverse, by saying that they don't do anything. It's obviously somewhere in between. And there's so many of them out there, guys. And the problem is that they just, it's either showing a willful desire, like you just to ignore facts

Starting point is 00:45:01 because you might be called something, which is just weak. It's cowardice. Or because you're bad at your job and you don't really see how obvious it is that Israel is doing what it's obviously doing. I think that's super important to see, guys, because it's certain people that may not even realize

Starting point is 00:45:14 they're doing it, but it still speaks to something deficient in their effort, their journalism, their research. because this guys is just damn obvious right now. Now this is the discussion of the infiltration attack. I'll include that as well and play the clip, of course, because it's perfect timing for it. But the idea that after Lebanon, the pager attack,

Starting point is 00:45:33 which is one of the most obvious terrorist attacks I've ever seen in my life, planned out to ultimately hurt indiscriminately, whoever those things ended up in front of. They said five years they circulated. I mean, even if you want to argue, like this is like saying because you put pagers in the hands of ISIS and let him circulate the world for five years that somehow if a child dies,

Starting point is 00:45:53 it's not your fault because ISIS had them. And I started talking about to try to even come close to comparing Hezbole and ISIS is insane, seeing as how one is a group created by the U.S. government and Israel to create terrorism and manipulate people, funded, armed, supported, flown around the world.

Starting point is 00:46:08 If you think that's crazy, you're so far behind it's insane. They've admitted to this actually many times, but the point is, Hezbollah is a resistance group fighting against an occupier, whatever you think about them. But the idea, clearly, you're going to say, you know, putting pagers with explosives or whatever we want to call this in the hands of people, anyone, and letting that circulate for years is deliberate.

Starting point is 00:46:29 That's indiscriminate. That is the definition of terrorism. So think about that mindset for what we're talking about. And as this government worms its way into everything this country is doing and then recognize that this is something they do by design. Did they buy it from? Or I think they were buying it from. We have an incredible array of possibilities of creation.

Starting point is 00:46:49 foreign companies that have no way being traced back to Israel, shell companies over shell companies who affect the supply chain to our favor. We create a pretend world. We are a global production company. We write the screenplay. We're the directors, we're the producers, we're the main actors, the world is our stage. Did you see any surprises in Gaza?

Starting point is 00:47:13 Surprises? Yeah. Like the intelligence surprises. Pages, walkie-talkies. Do you know how many equipment, I mean, treated equipment do we have in these countries? have in these countries? You can't, you're not. I do.

Starting point is 00:47:22 You mean, I do. You mean, you mean booby-trapped equipment? Not only booby-trapped and spying. Manipulated equipment. All right. In which countries you're talking about? All the countries that you can imagine. All the countries you can imagine.

Starting point is 00:47:37 Of course, you could be lying, never claimed otherwise. But that's an interview set up by Israel with the IDF and Mossade, rather, to discuss the idea of what they do, building fake shell companies and other countries to manipulate supply chain in their favor. That's just economic terrorism. Guys, you're talking about manipulation through subversion through illicit means. And they're proud about that. And that's somehow not a problem.

Starting point is 00:47:59 You know what I mean? It's just you can't deny how clear that is. Even saying that, even if it's false, and then having not nobody care about the fact that you allege that is just the same point. Just becomes clear, doesn't it? Now, overlapping this with a part to what Trump was discussing about quantum today. A new policy wrote this, while Congress seeks to expand. Israel's access, and we'll read this for you, to U.S. Quantum Technologies. White House is issuing a new

Starting point is 00:48:25 order identifying quantum as a top target of foreign espionage operations. Now, of course, one way to look at this, and maybe as how they're framing it, would be to say that this is being done by the White House because they're worried about the access Israel might have. But I don't see that represented in anything, anywhere. I hope so. That would be good. That'd be a good sign that our government, for whatever reason, profiteering or not, or opportunism or not, is trying to, to lean into your thoughts versus the foreign power. But this one is an article, a pending executive order, would task the FBI and intelligence community

Starting point is 00:48:58 with boosting U.S. quantum research protections against foreign spying. So here is the article, which has a listing of the National Defense Authorization Act, points I think are important here. Now, we read this, almost all of this, I remember the other part, We read through this in regard to the, I think it was 2-29, now it's 219, that specific part of it, not the entirety of the National Defense Authorization Act, which is large.

Starting point is 00:49:29 But these points you already knew. Now, I find it very relevant that suddenly for two reasons that this becomes a conversation today. You might have seen this weird Q thing going around lately. I don't mean this is the larger point, but weirdly the White House suddenly leaning into it and then kind of using Q to go, oh, but we meant quantum. interestingly timed, isn't it? Especially with the weird Alex Jones push

Starting point is 00:49:51 and all the stuff about the new breakdown of the Q information, which has been talked about forever long before he broke that story. And the lie about it that we've been calling out from the entire time about how they created that.

Starting point is 00:50:01 It's just, it's very interesting to me. And now that does tie in with the Israel agenda. And the idea that what we're talking about is ultimately creating an intertwining of the Israeli military, technological, you know,

Starting point is 00:50:14 everything about them, really, but the largely military intelligence intertwining, integrating with the U.S. And so if that's the case, with what we're going to show you is specifically quantum everything, and then you start this direction to create the quantum technological direction in order to get ahead of people being able to manipulate or, you know, like kind of like a cryptography being able to decipher what you were meaning behind it, you know, without like, what's the best word for it? Meaning like you can have intelligence that they can't access. They're worried about

Starting point is 00:50:45 that being, you know, through some kind of quantum, what's the word they were using? Again, I'm not the expert on this, but simply put something that could be behind a, you know, I don't want to use the wrong terminology, like not a firewall, but something that can be like through, if you're deciphering, God, what's the word I'm looking for? Bottom line, something that can be hidden through technological means that can then through quantum computing be accessed because they can hack that or whatever the right word would be. The point is that they're building in this direction to get ahead of that, as we'll read for you. and the idea being that if you're intertwining Israel behind the scenes

Starting point is 00:51:16 with the development of that technology, does that not open a weird door for them to be able to circum... That's what I think it is. You can decide for yourself. But give me the turn of trying to think of there. Now, backdoor is kind of what I was thinking in a larger sense. But what I meant by that was more just not that they have like a technological backdoor, but really just that they've opened this to be able to access

Starting point is 00:51:37 through their coordination and all this, rather circumvent the technology. But my point would be that, let me just read through it and I'll show you what I'm saying, is this is what the U.S. government is trying to say. I'm just trying to say it off the top of my head. But they're trying to say that this is being done like a lot of countries are to get, you know, think of it like the AI race in a specific way. They're trying to get ahead of this technology so that you can, one,

Starting point is 00:51:59 be able to use it against other adversaries, but also be able to get ahead of them being able to access what you might be having hidden. And I think the problem is that if Israel's involved in that process, with what we know they're doing, one, I would argue the U.S. government, if completely compromised by Israel, won't even look at them as an adversary, won't even block them out of this kind of stuff. But first before we get further into it all,

Starting point is 00:52:20 the Section 219 part of this that you'll want to hear again, that this is establishing in the National Defense Authorization Act, a new U.S.-Israel Defense Technology Cooperation Initiative aimed at accelerating joint research, so researching the direction, development of the technology, and integration of Israeli origin, and jointly developed defense technologies into U.S. military systems and programs of record.

Starting point is 00:52:46 Now, what it goes into is these specific types, which we'll say next. But so my point is, in the quantum side of this, if Israel is creating it of Israeli origin in their country or jointly developing that very technology, why wouldn't we be worried that that would be a problem for a group that is world-renowned for their technological manipulation. Now, what I'm focusing on is more than this, is we talk about, for drone systems and plenty of stuff, but one of the aspects that's leaned into in this entire document,

Starting point is 00:53:16 quantum computing, AI and autonomous systems, cyber electric warfare, directed energy weapons, and specifically, artificial intelligence, quantum machine learning, autonomous systems. And it says among the most concerning of the potential extensions of collaboration is artificial intelligence and quantum and biotechnology.

Starting point is 00:53:37 AI and quantum are and will be tremendously impactful on current and future U.S. military capabilities. And so just in a general sense, we're talking about something that is opening that door for the adversary, which clearly is, even to Americans in particular, that is known for this. So again, the idea being that you're building this to get ahead of that kind of backdoor manipulation or just, you know, a level of security above what we have now, and you're letting the wolf in the back door or however you want to, however you want to, you know, whatever analogy you want to use. Now under this article, and it says the White House expected direct intelligence agencies to protect quantum research from foreign threats.

Starting point is 00:54:15 Well, not if that one of those foreign threats is building it with you, right? To better protecting the nation's quantum research from foreign spying, right? A pending executive order, which he signed today, expected this week will task the FBI intelligence community with better protecting the nation's quantum research from foreign spying. Now it says the directive also places quantum research security security. inside the broader race against Q-Day. I hadn't even heard that yet. So apparently there's, you know,

Starting point is 00:54:48 because this has to do with the same kind of AI technological. There's a lot of factors that come down to this quantum, you know, as if it hasn't happened. I mean, one of my things about this is wondering whether or not a lot of this, sort of even like the AI point is even exactly what's going on. Maybe it's something they've already accomplished. Maybe it's something it doesn't even necessarily exist the way they claim. And that it's all about getting you in a certain position.

Starting point is 00:55:08 The very least, always ask those questions. I don't believe that. I do believe this is something. This has been talking about for a very long time. But just question how they apply it. Like, as Whitney's talked about in long time, whether we think AI is even effectively possible, which I do, it comes down to the idea that they may lie about that to get you in a certain position before it's even effectively there. Like that of the moon race argument. Either way, it says when the idea of Q-Day, when powerful quantum computers could break today's widely used encryption standards, encryption. That's what I was looking for, that protect governments to see, financial transactions and other sensitive data around the world. There is no firm Q-day deadline, but many experts placed the risk in the 2030s. Weirdo, everything seems to line up right there.

Starting point is 00:55:50 But so the end-up point is that you're talking about the current security where this potential quantum computing could then circumvent. For some reason, I couldn't think of the word encryption is the word I was looking for is the idea that you can then get around that. And so Israel, if building this stuff for you, like you're building a wall around your house, and Israel's building a door in it. I mean, that's certainly something they're capable of, or at the very least something that could circumvent that ability to stop you.

Starting point is 00:56:13 But says quantum is exactly the kind of target foreign intelligence services prioritized. It is a small field, but the talent is concentrated in a handful of universities and companies, and the work sits at the seam between fundamental research and national and economic security. Now, again, quantum computing is something that, I mean, I'm not an expert. It's about the general argument of what it's capable of and what people see it leading to. The really only point that I'm trying to make here is that if you have this entity without access to the creation of what appears to be a next level security idea, then it seems like a obvious no-brainer to not allow the biggest threat in the world

Starting point is 00:56:50 when it comes to that to help you build it. Just my thought. So here's Trump signing this today. We're going to be investing in American quantum leadership like never before to stay ahead of the pack. We're way ahead right now. We'll keep it that way. the second order I'm signing directs federal agency to transition to what is called quantum cryptography.

Starting point is 00:57:15 Do anybody know what that? Cryptography. As everyone's making fun of it, clearly he has no idea what this is. That is. You're going to hear very soon. So you're going to find it interesting cryptography for their computer. So it was an embarrassing thing. Like a lot of the things he's been doing lately, it just shows that he's, you know,

Starting point is 00:57:34 he used to be a pretty good BS artist. These days, it seems like he can't. I think he's used to falling back on his ability to just bluster and just nonsense. These days, he can't, it's clearly it's just, it's not some attack on his mental ability. It's just clearly he is struggling in that regard. It's obvious. As he says here, does anybody know what that is? No, at the end of the day, this is being signed, right?

Starting point is 00:57:57 Let's look at that. This is the executive order. Now, I'm not going to read the entire thing. The simple point is, in light of these threats, the United States must take steps to strengthen cryptographic protections for the nation-sensitive data, critical infrastructure, and digital economy, right? The digital aspect of a lot of this is where that's going to play a larger factor. But overall, this creates the direction securing the nation against advanced cryptographic attacks where, I guess, technically speaking, this could be something they could

Starting point is 00:58:27 accomplish if Trump is accurate, that it's something that's close. I mean, I don't even know why we take anything they claim at face value at this point. This could just be about trying to get other people in certain positions. But again, my main point is to worry about whether Israel is effectively joint creation of the very thing they used to stop Israel's actions within this kind of, you know, cyber attack dynamic. Feels like a really stupid setup to me. But again, my point is that I think there's something being done by design. That if that's correct, this is something being allowed so that there is no issue there

Starting point is 00:58:57 because Israel controls this country. I think a lot of people are becoming very aware of that. It's not about anything other than an Israeli government. action to gain power over their adversaries. And that is definitely as they see seemingly everybody else in the world. Now, Trump signs executive orders to drive development of commercially relevant quantum computing by 2028. So that's the first part of it is basically just to create commercially relevant, so something that could be marketed by 2028. Of course, using U.S. tax dollars. Next one was largely about the idea of, what did they read it as,

Starting point is 00:59:30 the protection aspect by 2030. So one of them is 2028 to build like a marketed version of it. And this says the second order seeks to protect government computers against quantum computer-fueled cyber attacks by setting a goal of migrating key government computing systems to post-quantum cryptography by 2030, 2031. And Israel's helping them do that. So I'm sure it'll all work out.

Starting point is 00:59:59 So Trump, interestingly, as I see this connecting, puts out this post, or rather the White House. Very weird. It's, it was almost like it was a glitch because that's how the site looks when you scroll down. But it says,

Starting point is 01:00:11 the White House will be Q posting today. I mean, they know very well what that means. They're doing it on a purpose. They'll even make an exact point to make it clear. But you scroll down enough and it says,

Starting point is 01:00:20 and by Q, we mean quantum. Stay tuned. How's today? Very weird. They post this later. Always trust. And they use it. They literally use a Q and on

Starting point is 01:00:33 dynamic. America will be the world's leader in quantum technologies, make America great again. Like so, remember when Trump so many times act like he doesn't even know what that is? They very well know what they're manipulating, guys. And that is obvious. Now, with what we're being told about the larger game, this is something else they're abusing. Here he writes, though, technically this is a post by Q, the Storm, so that this is the Q, like one of the main Q, you know, Twitter accounts. Major update. President Donald Trump just released this presidential message. We have it all. Enjoy the show. Whatever that means, of course, they're all going to tribunals. It's all going to go down. I'm sure. That's what they're screaming about.

Starting point is 01:01:14 But here's from the Department of War. Enjoy the show. Refill your popcorn. You'll love this next part. American quantum dominance. Q. Very interesting. Now, just my point is, here's what I see this as. You have a clear Israeli-led kind of technological field and the obvious infiltration and manipulation around the world. And this is something that I think they're leaning into. And this becomes the argument about what we need to do next. And Trump becomes the salesman for the empire. That's what I see him as, right?

Starting point is 01:01:49 Suddenly it becomes, we want to do this next. So Trump puts out his weird little cue dynamic to get people who are mindless followers to go, that thing is the thing I support today. Quantum is the next thing forever. And that's what you're going to get. And here's another cue post going, oh my God, They told us it's all coming down. It was all going to happen from the Q thing and the time.

Starting point is 01:02:06 And, you know, it's just sad. Now, I'm not going to say there's not things that I, there's points that have been made in the past. But at the end of the day, which was designed, by the way, to do that. That has become so nonsensical and so obviously manipulated. The end of the day, this is Trump salesman for the empire. Q, quantum. That's coming next.

Starting point is 01:02:25 And Israel's playing a role. I think that's quite obvious. So the digital ID aspect of that, as Catherine pointed out, this is one aspect, the quantum, this is part of the control grid they're building around you. And just in case you forgot that was still happening, as Derek writes, the digital ID agenda isn't going away. When you combine it with facial recognition and AI, you end up with the technocratic surveillance state that he's been warning about for years. Exit and build is the answer. Tony Blair touts the incredible benefits of merging digital ID with facial recognition and AI.

Starting point is 01:02:55 This is new. It's all being pushed around the world. And what you're going to get in this country, by the way, is the same thing you're getting there in the UK. or elsewhere, but Elon Musk's not going to screw about it. Why is that? Here's Matthew Green. I'm watching how quickly age verification is becoming a part of every policy proposal. We've already read this, in fact.

Starting point is 01:03:13 None of it is about age. It's about ultimately your identity. This is what we've read, the artificial intelligence framework policy. And it talks about exactly that. Implementation, it doesn't say digital IDs, but it's exactly what they're talking about. For everyone under the guise of protecting the children, just like in the UK.

Starting point is 01:03:28 It is the exact same thing they're doing, but you're not going to get it called out by the ones who are screeching about, and I think rightly so, about why it's a problem when it comes to the UK. Does he not, does the America First Elon Musk, part of the, technically still part of the administration, not care about the same problem being done here? Obviously, you know what I'm being facetious. Clearly, it only cares, you know, only matters when it's about the thing you can use for your agenda. They don't care about anything, it seems.

Starting point is 01:03:53 These people are sociopaths. The end of the day, this matters no matter where it's happening to me. And it's happening here. And again, the SAVE Act is a part of that, guys. and they're still pushing it. And it is about, as I've been posting repeatedly under anybody posting about the SAVE Act, you don't need real ID compliant identification to solve the problem they're pointing at. Take away the real ID aspect of it and everything works in the way they say it does right now.

Starting point is 01:04:18 You'll solve the problem. You don't need the digital ID part of it to solve the issue of the voting fraud or any of the things they argue the SAVE Act will solve. Real ID is the superfluous part. They're adding it because it leads to digital ID. you use the mobile driver's license aspect of it or the different parts that are rolling out together as Derek and I both talked about and eventually it becomes exactly what we're calling it. And I just hear that again. If you think this is about voting IDs or anything else, you can remove the real ID compliant

Starting point is 01:04:45 aspect of it and in fact it works even better. That's not what they're doing it for. Hopefully you know that by now. One last point on this. Just before we get into the administration and the reality of what some people would argue as MAGA being over or being dead. This is one of the reasons that's happening, guys, because you have people who are in what would arguably be the MAGA movement

Starting point is 01:05:06 or whatever you want to consider, you know, the conservative movement of today, which is very nebulous, same just like the liberal side, it really is, is that you have people like this who are standing up, this is young Americans for Liberty, and are calling out this, in this example, the flock cameras. Now, I don't, you know, his, it's not as, bottom line as I agree with what he's saying,

Starting point is 01:05:27 regardless of whether it's tactfully done. And the idea that this is, what I would argue, is a Republican calling out what the Republican administration is doing. And that is very clear with all of this, whether it's flock cameras or digital IDs or the surveillance that's happening, it is currently Trump's administration, which, by the way, is no different than what Biden was doing because it's not about partisanship.

Starting point is 01:05:47 And this is what people are starting to see. You get people who consider the cells conservative or liberal, and that does exist. People have values they believe in. And they just look to what's supposed to represent that in political and they don't see themselves. You know, and this is what we're getting, guys, because if you look at Jason Bassler for excellent coverage

Starting point is 01:06:04 on what's happening with these flock cameras. But here's what he had to say in front of the, what was it, in Florida. Daddy, Big Mama Nanny State, who wants to put flock cameras everywhere. That's the other thing I think y'all should do is ban flock cameras in this county. You know, if they want to put them on private buildings and spy on us like some little peep and tombs that's one thing but to use our own property that we have to maintain meaning personal commercial but like individuals or even on bike trails i've been seeing that lately as well so how's it only about license plates if it's in a bike trail where there's no cars around at all

Starting point is 01:06:52 because it's about surveillance it's about control grid that's what it's about it's about using these things to keep you in control for the government's purposes and that's not even what that's that if you look hard enough or bear it's barely beneath the surface. That's what they'll tell you. Get gathered data on us? I mean, this is 1984 animal farm, and they even calling us animals. Flock. It's a flock of sheep.

Starting point is 01:07:16 It's a flock of shit is what it is. Adios. And they go on to do what they want to do anyway. And I'm not even making it. I mean, this is what we do. They don't care, guys. We don't, I mean, look, I'm never going to diminish the importance of doing, even for other people to hear it, protesting or going there and speaking to your representatives, calling them on the phone. But you need to see by now, and I will never tell you

Starting point is 01:07:42 not to do that. But just make sure you realize that that is not going to be the only thing you should do. And I argue probably not the most relevant or important, because these people don't care what we think. You can have a line down the street of people at 99, 100% of the community, says we don't want these, and they'll do it anyway. I dealt with this with vaccine pushback in California a long time ago. Senator Pan, I believe, where people, you know, we were fighting this thing. People lined up out, I mean, hundreds, hundreds of people. saying we don't want this. And I think it was something like 30 people

Starting point is 01:08:10 who stood up and said yes. It voted for it anyway. It doesn't matter what we think. And that's the point of where we are is that they're going to do what they're going to do. Stand up, call it out, get people to see it. So we can share the clip. We can talk about it.

Starting point is 01:08:21 So we can make the point that government doesn't represent us anymore. And what we need to do from there is individual. You can choose. I have my ideas if you want to listen, but people need to recognize that change needs to come because they are not acting in our interest. And that, first segue, is exactly why some people would frame this as MAGA is over.

Starting point is 01:08:40 Because you're seeing this kind of disillusionment that we've rarely gotten from partisanship. It's a good thing, guys. I'm trying to show people it is a positive change. It's just, you know, people like what we're doing in this field will never truly get acknowledged for the kind of influence and work that we're doing. Because it's dangerous for the system.

Starting point is 01:08:59 Even a dying system. Make sure that people like we never, you know, it's not what we're doing this. It's about the change that we're watching, the change that we're influencing and you know it. So here's what Tim Dillon has to say. I just want to hear opening a quick part about it. And then we can discuss this briefly,

Starting point is 01:09:14 but just see that like we were saying in January, and in February, and in March, in April, that this was happening. Whether you want to see it as MAGA was a failure or what I would see it as what it really was, that is most MAGA people are calling out the team. And so MAGA is not failing in essence of what it really is. But we'll get to that more.

Starting point is 01:09:33 But just what he's saying is that this is something that is now beyond people are moving past whatever this construct was. That's a powerful thing, guys. I think my thing with this is that, you know, we're talking about a group that clearly wanted what they were promised, right? Self-interest. And I think at first, I mean, think about it this way. You know, easy it would have been for me to just,

Starting point is 01:09:54 because right at the beginning, what we're looking at what the maga momentum and Maha and people like myself and Whitney and Derek and we were going, okay, I doubt that's what's going to happen. And a lot of these people are all gung-ho about Trump. and I think it's pretty naive. And so I, calling out the MAGA movement right in the beginning. You know, easy it would have been to just continue to say the MAGA failed and MAGA is terrible and everyone's too.

Starting point is 01:10:15 And I would have gotten tons of support. But right in the early parts of it, I saw, I just didn't think that was the full picture. Even though I knew it would be contentious from any side, but it was the truth to me. And I still believe it's the truth to see that it was not all like that. But in fact, what I was starting to see early was that, wait a minute. most these people actually still stand there they believe they were fighting for america and they believe that trump is either doing what he said he was going to do when he's not or that they believe you might do better if you give him a chance but they see that he's failing them one by one day by day

Starting point is 01:10:50 agenda by agenda became more and more clear and more of them started to stand up and say you're failing us you got the tucker's the dave smith these large elements of it that showed you that change and that's not why i think that though those are just large i argue that's opportunism just the recognition of the fact that more interest is in that direction. And so we can continue to see that they're like, you know, I could be wrong. Maybe it's 49%, 51% maybe 51% of the movement still loves Trump. I still argue is enough of a huge movement of people that wanted to stop the vaccines, who wanted to actually save this country from what was happening, whatever you think that may look like. And I just think we have to acknowledge that by now because what you're going to get

Starting point is 01:11:29 if you fall into, and I don't, I don't want to say this is disingenuous because I agree with his general sentiment. But if you fall into the two-party trap by arguing that MAGA and the dumb Republicans with their red hats all failed, when that represents the mainstream of the larger conservative movement to people that want this country to be better, then you're going to fall for you. You're going to fall into the left-right paradigm. You're going to see the left of what they say and the right is what they say when I don't think that represents even a not even close to the majority of what these people truly are like today. Let alone the I think majority, which I really do think is the majority of people that see through it entirely.

Starting point is 01:12:06 So here's what Tim Dillon had to say. Vance knows that MAGA is ending. The MAGA movement, the party that Donald Trump threw when he walked and walked down the escalator is ending. And I think it ended with that UFC fight. I think that was the last party MAGA was going to throw. So the same way you could frame this as ended in the sense that Trump's momentum through it failed.

Starting point is 01:12:37 That's clear, I think. But I don't believe he's saying that every person who was MAGA is somehow like scattered to the wind or now doesn't or now all acts against what they originally wanted. I don't even think that's what he thinks. I think that's very obvious. So it's just about framing. But I really think that's important. And like any of the things like this that I could discuss, whether it was in the midst of COVID-19

Starting point is 01:13:01 and making sure people saw that a lot of. lot of Democrats, if not the majority, we're not falling for it. I still think that's provable. I'm going to stand by it, even though half my own audience sometimes thinks of, but that's what you come here for because I'm not going to be audience captured. I'm going to tell you what I think is the reality, even if it's unpopular. And sometimes I can be wrong. But look at my track record. I know, I don't try to do it. I think it's worth pointing that out often because it's not opinion. You can look for yourself. You can go back and look at how many times we were reporting on things that were months ahead of when it became the major conversation over and over and over.

Starting point is 01:13:37 And I'm proud of that. Same with Derek. Same with Whitney. Same with half the – I mean, that's the truth, guys. Anyway, I digress. To the point here, what he's saying is that this is over, and I believe it's because – what he means, in my opinion, is the momentum from the Trump team around their illusory, the fact that they promised what they knew the MAGA movement wanted

Starting point is 01:13:53 and then failed to deliver it. So the political version of what Trump needed from MAGA has failed. had motocross you had UFC fights that was a fun party but it's the final i think it's the final party i think in the same way that that imagined video during covid hollywood didn't know it then but that was the end of them like that was the finale of holly of holly they didn't know they thought they were making a video trying to i don't know what the hell they were trying to get people to do stay in their house or shut their mouths or whatever or feel you know some sort of way, you know, or, you know, they wanted to do this, you know, thing to calm people

Starting point is 01:14:35 down or I inspire them, whatever was in their mind. That imagined video was the end of Hollywood. It was the finale. It was the series finale of whatever Hollywood was from its inception in the early 1900s to that imagined video in 2020, I think. That was the end. And in the same, in the same, way that I think the MAGA movement's final party was the octagon on the White House lawn. That seems to be a fitting symbol of the finale of the MAGA movement. As a cultural force, that was the most fun. It's not going to get more fun than that. See, as a cultural force.

Starting point is 01:15:27 you know, maybe I'm just hearing what I want, but I think that that's, that's where I get the sense that it's not, you know, the people that actually still believe these things, but the political momentum around what they were utilizing through all of your genuine support. Take a look at that. Take a look. You know, what are you going to do? You can't top UFC on the White House lawn.

Starting point is 01:15:51 And then one guy comes out and goes, Michelle Obama's a man. Could it get better than that for these people? This is, this was the finale. This is the penultimate conclusion of MAGA. It's a UFC fight on a White House lawn with motocross, and then one of the fighters goes, by the way, do you want to say anything? And he goes, Michelle Obama's a man.

Starting point is 01:16:15 And that is the finale. But they don't know it yet. Here's the thing. They don't know it yet. In the same way that when Hollywood did that Imagine video, they had no idea that they were on their way to being like irrelevant and hated. And it's about J.D. Vance being selected by an omniscient god, hair them down.

Starting point is 01:16:43 We like to shred them. You know, that's part of the, part of the deal. And the beginning of people turning on Hollywood was that video. and this will be the finale of the MAGA movement, and they don't know it yet. So J.D. Vance, our vice president, is out on the podcast circuit with a new book called God Chose Me,

Starting point is 01:17:14 and it's about J.D. Vance being selected by an omniscient God. Crazy. To lead our country. I think from what I understand in the book, and I haven't read it, I have not read it. From what I understand in the book, God appears to J.D. Vance in the White House and tells J.D. Vance, you got to go along with the Iran stuff up until they have some kind of deal, and then you could kind of start distancing yourself from Trump before the midterms. and you have to at that point, you know, release a book about finding your way back to faith,

Starting point is 01:18:04 its own country. After we have attacked them, that's one of the craziest things I've ever heard. People like me were saying that before the war. We were going, yeah, well, these people want some defensive capabilities. And J.D. Vance, if you could pull that up, Jady Vance is now saying that now. It's, I mean, all we're getting into, we'll get into Ron more in a minute is exactly what we've been pointing out from the very beginning, which is that, yeah, that Trump comes out and goes, well, like I was saying earlier, they deserve to have some weapons and they deserve to have a civilly nuclear program. It's like, you can't just turn like that. You can't say no, no matter what, ultimate surrender and then use our argument back at us when you fail.

Starting point is 01:18:43 That just makes it spectacularly more weak. You know what I mean? Like just owning, well, we didn't succeed. That's what a leader would do, right? not somebody who will blame the New York Times and the military and you and anybody else, just shuck responsibility every single possible way. That's pathetic. But this is my point, guys, is this is being stated by people everywhere.

Starting point is 01:19:04 And this was clear from the beginning, from Stargate forward is my opinion. You begin to see people going, whoa, hold on, an AI-powered vaccine program. Hold on a minute. That's not what we put. And here's funny. That's not what we voted for. You're getting that from a lot of people to turn and go, yes, you did. Well, maybe we saw that that's what was coming because we did as we as anybody.

Starting point is 01:19:27 But they did not because you can't tell me, not everyone, you can't tell me that a conservative Republican, whatever you want to call it, who was fighting the fucks, the vaccines and all this stuff, then would just completely on a dime turn around and go, yay, the thing I didn't want because that's just not self-interest. That's what I'm trying to highlight. I don't think that's the reality. So clearly, it started very early where people recognized this was against what they actually wanted. And they didn't vote for an AI-powered Stargate AI vaccine program.

Starting point is 01:19:57 Nobody did. See my point? So I think what you're getting is this kind of weaponized game to make anybody on one side the caricature and, you know, verse the other caricature. And if they do that, they force us back into our sides. That's what I think this becomes. Now, here is Tucker Carlson. Tells Republican Party, I'm out. June 22nd, 2026.

Starting point is 01:20:19 Carlson remains a major figure in conservative media, this is Newsweek, and his rejection of the party signals a deeper fracture inside the right as the Iran War and U.S. Israel policy dominate internal debate. I mean, this is mainstream, guys. We're still pretending like everyone's not concerned about Israel influence and U.S. policy? Carlson made the announcement during a June 18th appearance on Can't Be Censored podcast saying a GOP has betrayed Americans by prioritizing the interest of a foreign government over its own citizens. quote, I would not support the Republican Party.

Starting point is 01:20:49 There's no chance I would support the Republican Party. I'm out, he says. Now, I actually don't think this is indicative of like, I'm going to support Democrat Party. If he does, I'll just make fun of him even more than I've ever had because that's just pathetic and stupid because it's just the same problem. But so that's, you know, again, I would hope this goes in a positive, you know, if he comes out and starts arguing that we shouldn't have a government.

Starting point is 01:21:09 I'll support that. Either way, it's a demonstration whether through opportunism or whatever you read it as, to demonstrating that there's a shift happening. What we were telling you, long before we got here, Carlson argued that Republican leaders have placed loyalty to Israel above U.S. interests. You know, what a lot of us were highlighting long before Tucker Carlson made a statement, which now becomes we're parenting the Tucker Carlson conversation.

Starting point is 01:21:32 It's not what's happening. It's obvious that Israel has been infiltrating politics around the world. It's that they'll brag about it. And you can clearly see that they're influencing policy, even if it's just through lobbying, but it's a lot more than that, as we all can see. He said in the podcast appearance, how could I or any American voter support a political party that's not loyal to the United States? A good question. Stephen Miller.

Starting point is 01:21:54 Brian asked. That puts the interest of a foreign country above those of its own citizens, Pete Hankseth. Everyone in Trump's administration. It's not possible to vote for people like that. And I'm not going to, he says. So there's no indication of what he's going to do or not, right? But we'll see. What he does next, we'll be telling.

Starting point is 01:22:12 But, you know, one of the worries is the America. party with Elon Musk or some new extension of the same two-party illusion. Even with good intentions, if it's like a Massey candidate who he believes in, and maybe he does think it's going to, I still argue that the system is broken. I mean, Massey makes the argument half the time. The system is broken to the degree that it cannot be fixed through the system. It's by design, if you want my honest opinion, which I always give, because the truth is that this is something that has been set. The status quo must be maintained for the system, for the agenda around it. So leading into another part, of the system is not going to change the system by design. But the point I'm making is that people

Starting point is 01:22:51 everywhere are seeing through this. Trump, Donald Trump commentary, you know, like reposting what he does from True Social, says, what's the most dangerous threat to liberty in America? Oh, actually, hold on. I thought I had the results on this. That's weird. I swear I saw the results on this already. Huh. Well, either way, what was interesting is he got ratio just on the proposal, the question. Because look, this is what. This is what. Donald Trump puts out. Biggest threat to liberty. Russia, China, other.

Starting point is 01:23:24 Very clear. Russia and Thomas Massey goes, what's the biggest threat to America? Russia, China, Israel, U.S. government. I'm willing to bet you anything that under their post, plus Massey's audience, because he's commenting, you're going to get predominantly Israel, U.S. government as the response.

Starting point is 01:23:39 Because ladies and gentlemen, that is what Americans think. Got to stop listening to partisan media, mainstream alternative media, mainstream media. It's an illusion keeping you trapped in their system. So here, to make a couple points before we get into, I think next, yeah, getting into the Iran part to finish is, there's three points I'm making here. One is the reason that people are falling away from the illusory two-party illusion, specifically the fake version of the MAGA movement, which is Trump's side of it. Because it is cartoonishly stupid, because it is anti-American.

Starting point is 01:24:17 And it's, and it's, if you don't think I'm making a partisan, it's not. Look, Biden was in the same position. The point here right now is that what you're going, this is just a new red light, holy crap guy I'll show you, who apparently is running for Congress. It's just wild to me what's happening, but showing you what the fake MAGA movement actually looks like. And then comparing those cartoons to what people out in the world actually are like and believe in conservatism or whatever you want to call the side of the conversation. This is a cartoon. Now here's what's crazy. Michael Cabo Carbona, who by the way, I only just saw this first time today, posted this.

Starting point is 01:24:50 if you go through his feed, and here's what's crazy, family man, entrepreneur, Republican for Congress. Right? So you're going to see, this is either a fake account for all I can tell or a real person who recognizes what the red light, holy crap, gaming of this platform does. Because he goes, red light, wow! And says, Cash Patel confirms felony convictions for James Comey

Starting point is 01:25:12 and plays a video from April. Now, maybe if you got one, maybe this guy running for Congress just doesn't realize that he got tricked by some other fake, account, right? And shared an old video of Cash Patel and got it wrong, by the way, shares an old video and then claims he confirms felony convictions. No, he did not. What he confirmed was the indictments. And how often do I point that out? That they either don't know the indictments are not criminal, not criminal, you know, they're not conclusive. It's an investigation. It's an accusation. But so my point is twofold on this one point right here. So he posts an old

Starting point is 01:25:46 video. So he's either bad at that or lying and then lies about what the video is. And then lies about what the video even says. So I think it's quite obvious. This guy is either not real or is somebody who is recognizing how easy it is to profit and benefit, maybe even for his political agenda by simply playing the online holy crap red light game, which is just to follow the leader and do the same things over and over. By the way, here's his post from the FBI from April 28th, just in case you didn't know that that was an old video. And you can play them, check it for yourself. And I just simply showed this and said every time the guy's going, they can firm convictions when it was really an indictment.

Starting point is 01:26:26 But then I realized, wait a minute, check this out. This new red light, holy crap guy has only one subscriber. Do you know who that is? Elon Musk. Do you think that's an accident? One subscription and it's Elon Musk. Well, look at that, guys. It must just be coincidence that the guy who is gaining the system with fake content

Starting point is 01:26:48 just happens to be subscribed by Elon Musk subscribes to him. Now let me make it even more clear, guys. Okay, here is the same guy doing the same video. that I keep showing you is sort of some kind of thing they all do. This is an old video from 2025 of Jesse Waters sharing the clip of Tulsi Gabbard of Russiagate Obama. It's all coming down. He posts this today and says, expose it all. Barack Speedy or CD and, wait, Barack Obama's Cee pass continues to get worse and worse. He cannot get away. You mean this video from 2025? So he knows what he's doing, guys. Either it's a fake account or this guy.

Starting point is 01:27:27 is going, I see. I see. So I want to get elected through faking stuff on this platform. Watch him actually get elected. It wouldn't surprise me. This is where the world is going. You get people, like, this is what I see happening in this country right now. The people don't seem to be leaning into it, but the power is, and the problem is that they are gaming everything. Like the analogy that Charlie Robinson pointed out in our last discussion, next one's coming up next week, what the hell is happening? Where he said the analogy is they're fraudsters and criminals, But it's just like a sophomoric amateur version of it. Essentially like they're stealing the silverware from the White House,

Starting point is 01:28:03 as opposed to stealing from everybody else. They're robbing the silverware as they've run out the door, stuff in their pockets. That's what it feels like. And so you get people that are going, I see, I'm going to play into that. Right. So you get this fake element of people end up being like finding themselves into literal positions of power by straight up lying on this platform or whatever else you want to see in the real world version of it.

Starting point is 01:28:23 Now, all I really want to highlight is this is a big, this guy has 73,000 followers. Now watch as he ends up with a million followers because he leans into the same dynamic. And if you really do look at the account, I mean, it's all the same stuff. Look, if these fake weird half clips with old content or resharing like this one here, like I just showed you, these are both old videos, you go down the list and it's the same thing. Red light, wow, red light, exposed it all. Holy crap. Oh, look, here he is again sharing the same video. Look, 14 hours ago.

Starting point is 01:28:54 Oh, look at this one. 14 hours ago. He reposted it. So you just continue to reshare the same false information? Yes, same thing there. All I'm really highlighting is these are people that are gaming the system to a degree to manipulate you into a certain position. And he's running for Congress with Elon Musk as a subscriber,

Starting point is 01:29:12 as he knowingly lies to you and shares all information that gets 100,000 views or a million views or games it to where he makes money from it. Now, in the same larger point, that's what I'm highlighting is this fake MAGA movement and why people are starting to see through it or always have. because of ridiculous people like this. Here is lives of TikTok. Remember the one that had that binder, most transparent history for the Epstein files

Starting point is 01:29:34 and now shouts you down for even talking about it? Because they're gross, disgusting, dishonest people. She says, meet Roy, Rory Arnold. He's a teacher. He appeared to threaten Trump supporters and Stephen Miller in unhinged posts. Okay. These are people teaching your kids.

Starting point is 01:29:52 Any comment, and they've gone on a campaign of trying to docks and get them fired. because this is what the woke right looks like, ladies and gentlemen, because here's what he posted. It says, Trump is such a great commander-in-chief that he went to the UFC fight while the country is at war with Iran. Hopefully, you maggots get what's coming to you,

Starting point is 01:30:09 and it's extremely painful. Yeah, guys, that is milk toast compared to the kind of stuff that's being stayed on this platform by, let alone the Hebrew-Israeli counts, but the people just like them. So now you're going to tell me that you're going to say that you hope you have a painful day is enough to put people in prison. That is exactly what you're going to.

Starting point is 01:30:25 tried to call out in the left, guys. You're a hypocrite. Miller needs to be shot out of a cannon into the sun. Oh, because what, so you're going to mean, literally? So you're going to, I mean, the idea that you can't recognize the hyperbolic statement that is get this guy out of here. But I mean, even if you want to pretend, fine, then be consistent. And go down the list of people like James Woods and Laura Lumer and all the rest of them who are openly, openly using hateful terms and actual threats, or any number of examples of people doing exactly that on left and right. These people are disgusting hypocrites,

Starting point is 01:30:57 and they don't even care. That's the sad part, the woke ride. But it's people like her that are making people see through the fake MAGA team, guys. Laurel Lumer. Lumer posted yesterday. Remember, there was a minute

Starting point is 01:31:14 where she was, you know, and I think she just slipped up where she's only using the word Islam because she tries to make a distinction between Islam versus Muslims, even though it really just means Muslim cult. Here, she says, The Muslims are always the aggressor in all conflicts.

Starting point is 01:31:28 Remember that. She posted that. Not only is that just shockingly stupid and factually incorrect, 400,000 views. It's insane, guys. My opinion is always she has every right to say that. She can say and think what you wants. It's about the hypocrisy of this platform,

Starting point is 01:31:46 allowing that while censoring others. I don't want any of them to be censored. I want all of it to be seen and said. If you want to, it's you're right. but just recognizing the disgusting nature of what these people are. That's the fake MAGA movement and people see right through her. So on this interesting note, Trump himself is a reason. I think this is obvious, okay?

Starting point is 01:32:09 Now, I haven't talked about this stupid discussion because I think it's kind of ridiculous how much is the reflecting pool. It's hilarious to me. How you what you get is a bunch of Republicans going, they've talked about this reflecting pool more than all. stories combined and then you look at their Republican media and all they're all talking about how they're all talking about their flas so you're doing the same thing but your story is they're all talking about it and you can't stop talking about how they're all talking about it.

Starting point is 01:32:37 This is my point. Left and right of the same thing in their weird different versions, they're the same stupid thing. And I think it's so sad because the reality is yes, there's obvious criminality. I'll point that out next with the guy he gave the contract to, which I already covered. But the idea of what, you know, this game, what I'm sharing this for is to demonstrate why Trump himself is the reason that not stupid people are seeing through this. I don't mean all smart people, but just not dumb. You see through this because it's obvious is my point.

Starting point is 01:33:05 And what he's doing, and I just shared it with the MS-13 clip because it's humorous, he's doing kind of the same thing in this clip where a guy holds him to account about this, about the pool and the allegation that somebody went in there and cut this thing. I mean, guys, you could see this step by step if you cared to follow this dumb story about what they did and how they failed in this and how they got caught. dumping that stuff in the pool. And guys, it's like a one, two, three kind of idea. You can see how this went.

Starting point is 01:33:30 And now they're blaming somebody else who cut the thing. Do you realize there's cameras around this whole thing? And even if, let's even say it was somebody, then do something, put him in jail, arrest him and charge it with vandalism. This story is insanely stupid and wasting everybody's time. What I'm highlighting this for is simply to show you that this person is so law, this was the BS point. He can't even lie to you appropriately anymore because he, I guess he can't call on his

Starting point is 01:33:54 same kind of cognitive responses. But either way, this is obvious to anybody who's not a blind sycophant. And I don't believe that's most people, or at least not the majority. I guess I missed that somehow. As I grab this, what he's basically going to do is talk about the pool and how they claim somebody vandalized it. And simple question of just, you know, how with the evidence and the way he responds, I think it speaks volumes.

Starting point is 01:34:26 It's embarrassing the way he responds because it shows you that. He doesn't, he lies very transparently these days. Let's put it that way. Are the contractors who did the initial work with a reflecting pool? Are they to blame for the current condition? Or is it the band. In case you didn't hear, he just simply said, are they the blame the contractors for the current conditions,

Starting point is 01:34:50 which is what most people I'm seeing, technically speaking, or arguing? You know, even the idea that somebody cut something on the bottom of this thing doesn't explain all the repercussions. that we have seen. And all he does here is float out unprovable allegations about, you know, say they said somebody could have dumped fertilizer and oh, no, well, no, you can walk right through how this seems to have happened. But again, that's not even the relevant part of this conversation. You know, we have a, I think, 290, 300 foot slit right through it, probably a box cutter or a knife of some kind. Yeah, right, because it makes sense that somebody literally got inside the pool

Starting point is 01:35:25 when nobody could see them apparently, no cameras, no cops that are always there, and then walked 300 yards with a knife cut with a box cutter because that just seems totally logical right i mean did they even think this through the number changes three times while he's talking about this my point again is not about the pool but the fact that honest people whatever there's can see that this is you're you're going this is even if it's the truth you can tell that he's blustering adding to it to make it seem and that's just people don't buy this anymore that's my opinion Well, we had people lifting up the basic, some of the, but it's not a lot of damage, but it's, we'll probably have to let the water out and refix it.

Starting point is 01:36:05 They went in there with the knife. I was just told by the people over at parks, they have five people are arrested and five people are under investigation, right? Which seems like absolute BS to me, frankly, because what you're saying is if it was one person who cut it with a box cutter, then why would five people be arrested? And just so you understand, if you can look for yourself, they were all random people. They were like leaning into it and somebody walks up and goes, hey, you can't do that. And they take them in for questioning.

Starting point is 01:36:33 Then why would that be connected to this? And why would five of them be separately connected to one cut? It doesn't make any sense. What you're getting is a ton of people because they've made this some ridiculous story, taking pictures and reaching it and grabbing some of the blue stuff. Everyone's been doing that. All they're doing is grabbing people while they're there and make, oh, we arrested five people. Well, let's wait and see what happens.

Starting point is 01:36:52 I'm only to bet you anything that it becomes nothing. or that they try to arbitrarily charge someone with some kind of vandalism charged because they were reaching in the pool and act like that's the proof that they did everything. Watch. And it's a sad thing. In addition to that, they, you know, we put brand new beautiful grass all around. They put these massive letters on the grass. You probably know about that, right?

Starting point is 01:37:16 And they said 86, 47. Oh, no. They probably got that from the dirty cop. Come me. You know he's a dirty cop, don't you? Good thing you arrested in for his crimes, right, Trump? Oh, yeah, it hasn't happened yet. I'm sure it will. He's a crooked guy.

Starting point is 01:37:33 They destroyed the grass. So that's a big thing. Right, because Comey's a crooked cop. That's why they destroyed the grass. Lines up. But we're going to get it back very soon. National Guard and police have been all over the mall. How would these vandals have gotten so close to do something like that?

Starting point is 01:37:49 Yeah, good question. I mean, we didn't have, we didn't have a lot of them then. Who would think that somebody would go into? to a pool and take it. Oh, so avoid the question entirely. Who would think somebody would do the thing that seems completely logical that we can't prove? Seems crazy. Yes, we agree, Trump.

Starting point is 01:38:03 ...and start cutting it. Did you have proof of that? Yeah, yeah, we have proof. Well, let's put it this way. When you have a 350, I think it's 350, not... Oh, now it's 350. Long cut. 250, a 350 foot slit from one end to the other?

Starting point is 01:38:20 You think that's proof? Oh, is it proof? So the alleged cut that we can't see. because it's not there, not like that, is proof that he knows somebody did that, even though what you're saying is not actually visible the way you're saying it. But the allegation that it's there isn't that proof that what I'm saying is true? This guy deserves to be laughed at. That's dumb.

Starting point is 01:38:39 And he just, I don't even understand why, well, again, I take it bad. I think he has clearly degraded and his ability to do this and doesn't realize that. And the reports have been down there today looking for that slip that you mentioned. And there's no evidence. And there's no evidence. That's the point. the parks department they'll show it to you or see oh yeah just go ask those guys over there who work for me and they'll tell you it's there even though we can look and it's not there totally see uh

Starting point is 01:39:04 the secretary but i saw it they cut it they cut it very violently now see for the team support players who only care about whatever trump says that day i support the current thing version of the republicans who i don't think is the majority and aren't the real mega movement will all go we know it because trump saw it proof the same thing with the floor they cut it and then they they lifted it, they pulled it, and that's what it is. And, you know, we've done over for 50 monuments. Number one, we start with this is now a safe city. It's the safest as safe.

Starting point is 01:39:36 Oh, okay. So number one, different topic. I did good things in the city and it's great. That's number one for a question that has nothing to do with, you know, he's just deviating. Let me tell you why Washington C is the best ever. And by the way, as I keep showing you, it's not valid. It's not reality.

Starting point is 01:39:51 Because it's not, especially seeing us how you still have to, deployed National Guard and Marine station points and deploying ice and all these different things that have people scared. And rightly so, because it's insane. But even then, guys, you have this kind of an effect. It's not reality. You simply have military marching through the streets and then people will react differently. But on top of that, you can look at the numbers for yourself and recognize, as we showed you

Starting point is 01:40:13 last time for the second time, it was already a 30-year low before this even started. And it's sort of like, interesting enough, the same numbers that Buckele is putting out. Look at how many, look at this graph that shows that when I put you on prison, all the crime stock. Well, the reality was the graph was already massively dipping down for people for crime and murder going down. And then they instantly started arresting everybody. And we know how this actually went.

Starting point is 01:40:36 We've talked about that story, not to deviate too much. They suspended civil liberties. Is that what you support Republicans? Yeah, he suspend our freedom and our rights because the Bucaly did it and it worked. I mean, you just can't make up the stupidity that comes from some of these partisans. The truth is that he put people in prison. No justifiable cause. You guys, we went down the list of the horrible, that is a dictator.

Starting point is 01:40:56 And he happily calls himself that. Trump called him the coolest dictator. So it's okay. They're trying to normalize the idea of the network state discussion. It's okay. You don't have to have rights as long as we make everything the way you wanted. Okay. Well, who then gets to hold them to account 10 years down the line that we're not getting

Starting point is 01:41:11 what we wanted? Well, nobody, because everyone's happy. Says who? Like, in what world do you not think about that down the future? That's you'll own nothing and ever been happier because we told you. Because they get to say you're happy and you don't get to fight back because there's no mechanism to do that. It's a company. The city is you're going to get in the country.

Starting point is 01:41:29 And when I came here, it was a very dangerous city. And number two, put 30 year low when he came here. What we did is the beautification with the parks and the grass and everything, removal of all the tents. And this is like a different place. One of the things we did is over 50 fountains and statues. That's what Americans care about, right? Most of which were in horrible shape. them were bad, but somewhere was just absolutely horrible.

Starting point is 01:41:55 Now, look, I want to be clear, you know, if these are in your community, and it's not, see, this is what, this was frustrating. The government doing what it's expected to do should not be something they take credit for. That's your job. That's how that's, you know, fixing cracks in the street. That's how that's what you argue our tax dollars go to, but they don't, though. It goes to war, goes to foreign influence. It goes to all kinds of black op.

Starting point is 01:42:17 That's what it goes towards. So that's why they're catching up with things they should have already been doing. But either way, let's just see, you know, you have. find yourself in a moment right now where we have all these things we want, all these things we want to change, and he goes to fix fountains. Even though we can acknowledge, yes, it probably should have happened. And it's good that it's fixed. Why is that? Because they're symbols, they're illusory. It's imagery. Look at how great it all is. I can take pictures of the fountains and make sure you how great America is. Well, that's not America, Trump. That's an illusion.

Starting point is 01:42:44 What we wanted was, you know, things that, I mean, you go down the list. I mean, going back to to old statements like, you know, foreign funding, well, kids don't have pencils in schools, you know, things like that matter. But let's fix up some fountains and pretend that we're saving everybody while you're committing genocide and starting wars that nobody wanted. Feeder, you couldn't even see the stone. They've all been fixed. We also fixed the reflecting pool.

Starting point is 01:43:06 In fact, if you go over there right now, it looks very. Oh, whoops. Okay, here's what's funny. It's not. I'm telling you this is what just happened. He got into his mode of going like, look at how great, we did this. We did the fountains and we did the reflecting pool. Oh, wait.

Starting point is 01:43:19 But I was just talking about how it's not fixed, but it's fixed. kind of now, but let's get back to how it's not fixed. That is the dumbest thing in the world. This is what he does. I'm telling you. And he just gets in a roll and he goes, oh, and he catches himself. Watch.

Starting point is 01:43:34 Bad, but somewhere just absolutely horrible. Graffiti, you couldn't even see the stone. They've all been fixed. We also fixed the reflecting pool. In fact, if you go over there right now, it looks very good. It's up. They put somebody said fertilizer in the water. Okay, hold on.

Starting point is 01:43:52 So it looks good. What's his point? Right? Absolutely horrible. Graffiti, you couldn't even see the stone. They've all been fixed. We also fixed the reflecting pool. In fact, if you go over there right now, it looks very good. Looks very good. It's up. It's up. They put something. Oh, okay, so by logic, you would argue what he's doing and saying they fixed it. It looks great. They put what, Trump, hydrogen peroxide in the pool like we all saw to fix the bat? Yes, that's what he was going to say. then realized, oops, wait a minute, that I'm not supposed to say that

Starting point is 01:44:24 because everyone's acknowledging that that is why this whole thing spun out because you were trying to cover up something that was already happening and it all cascaded and yes, that's where you are. That's what he does. Anybody can see that if you're not looking through a partisan lens because you caught them.

Starting point is 01:44:39 They were on video doing that. And so listen all straight through and you'll be able to hear it. It's clear. And then what he does is goes, I heard that fertilizer could have caused that. And I think that's what Democrats did. you just can't that's you just pivoted into a whole different thought it's pretty clear

Starting point is 01:44:54 even see the stone they've all been fixed we also fixed the uh reflecting pool in fact if you go over there right now it looks very good it's uh up uh they put somebody said fertilizer in the water if you put fertilizer in the water you get algae but somebody said they might have put fertilizer Did they just something to create? Somebody said might have. Yeah, somebody could have done something, sure. But that doesn't matter because that's been purified.

Starting point is 01:45:24 Oh, okay. So it's bad. It was good. It was bad. But then we fixed it. So it's kind of good. You go, look, it's good right now. But now it's still bad again because it's not fixed.

Starting point is 01:45:32 It's dead. Laying at the bottom, they're taking it out. They vacuum it out. They vacuum it very carefully out. And it'll be back to health pretty soon. Oh, pretty soon. So not yet. Got it.

Starting point is 01:45:43 Now we're back to bat again. We're going to have to let the water out to fix the one little, there's two little areas, very little areas where they were cut, and we'll fix that, but it's not leaking or anything. It's got a base underneath. Part of what's curious about this situation is we stood here with you in April when you first revealed the plans. I said what?

Starting point is 01:46:01 In April, you showed us pictures of what you were going to do at the pool one. You said you had a guy who was going to do it in a week for about a million dollars. Well, it's been two months, 16 and a half million dollars. Yeah, okay, ready? Barack Hussein Obama, have you ever? He's ever heard of him? Yeah. He spent two years and over $100 million.

Starting point is 01:46:18 Right. So he pivists on saying, Obama did all this stuff. You failed at what you promised. You went over the price. And so your argument is, but Obama did a lot worse. Yep.

Starting point is 01:46:28 Typical partisanship. Yeah. And so somebody's laughing in the chat saying, Ryan, this changes everything. Yes, obviously, as my point was, this is not some bombshell. It's about realizing this is why people who are not mindless followers on partisan sides,

Starting point is 01:46:41 we'll see through this. it's obvious because this is something anybody who's following along would go yes he's clearly being dishonest that's why it matters in the context of the larger conversation this kind of stuff is why people are seeing beyond it truly the reason i'm even highlighting this is to reach you people in the chat who don't think this is actually what people are seeing of course i could be wrong but i i know there's a lot of people that somehow think that like every maga person blindly follows trump i don't think that's objectively not the case my opinion and i think stuff like this is just obvious example of why that is the case. I guess it depends on whether you think most people

Starting point is 01:47:16 are, you know, the intelligence scale. I don't think people are as dumb on average that the system wants you to think. When trying to fix it, you know what happened to it? Never even opened. He took the water for the river. You know about that, right? It turned out to be putrid, and it destroyed the whole thing. Spent over 100 million. Him and Biden together spent $147 million. You know what happened? Never opened. And you don't mention that, right? I spent, we spent about 10, many of the, much of the money we speak are park workers. They're there whether they do this or not, as you know.

Starting point is 01:47:52 They work in the park and they're very good workers. They did a great job. So they were going to spend three to four hundred million dollars. You know that. Oh, we're definitely going to finish it now. Definitely. But see, the point here is also the fact that he'd be willing to lie about something this stupid. Right?

Starting point is 01:48:11 That shows you that he's weak. that he's a insecure type person that is willing to lie about something so insignificant because he just doesn't want to be seen as the failure, as the wrong one. To me, that's not somebody in charge. That's not somebody calling the shots. It was going to take four years.

Starting point is 01:48:26 I spent about six, seven weeks, and I spent probably in terms of outside, probably $10 million, around $10 million. They say 16, but a lot of those workers that work for the same thing. So they were going to spend $400 million. I spent 10. They were going to spend four years.

Starting point is 01:48:49 I spent two months, maybe, less. And I have a better product. Now, I can't help it if somebody goes in where the knife and starts hacking it up. And we also have pictures of it. Oh, yeah. Can we see those pictures down from? Yeah, at the right time you'll see it.

Starting point is 01:49:06 You'll see it in court. Oh, in court. Got it, which probably won't come out. We'll see it in court. you have to do as cool. Like if he wanted to prove it to you, it'd be easy. Here, it's right there, man. Look at the guy cutting it right there. Nobody actually believes that. The Parks Department called the Department of Interior and I don't know if their lawyers will allow you to speak to. Oh, you know, it might be tough. Maybe you can't even get through. But go ahead and try

Starting point is 01:49:29 though. It'll prove everything. I mean, guys, this is like the lowest. It just speaks for itself. I truly think this is a good complicate. People are going to look at that and just like, you know, share it to some point it's not like politically active they're going to laugh at this person you know like somebody that's never even heard Donald Trump it's like this guy's a moron you write fake news but uh call you know you're right fake news but uh called the interior department and i understand they've arrested five people and they have another five people that are under investigation uh here's the bottom line we made so much progress in this city people don't even recognize it.

Starting point is 01:50:11 Bottom line, back to the thing we weren't even talking about. Right. So, Flucky Pool, and then bottom line is, I did things really great in over here in the city. Me, I'm the one. That's just Trump should have that tattooed on his forehead. My God. So that's why I compared it to the MS-13 point because it's just, you know, it's just like forceful stupidity that you just can't miss.

Starting point is 01:50:34 But, you know, this is I do think is relevant, guys. This is a bigger point that is kind of almost eclipsed by the stupidity of this conversation. that's probably by design, rather incompetent than criminal, right? This is Trump, donor, and Mar-Lago neighbor John Kaffara. We talked about this on the 19th of June. I simply said, this is what they mean when they say the Epstein class. This guy's like a monopoly cartoon. This is insane.

Starting point is 01:50:55 This guy is a neighbor to Trump, Mar-a-Lago neighbor, who got a no-bid 10, what was it was? I remember I reported this last time. I had the other post-up as well. But I think it was a $10 million, no-bid contracted to do the reflecting pool. And here we are. And this is what happens when you work with fraudsters. You know, it just kills me.

Starting point is 01:51:16 And this guy is guilty of previous crimes. It just becomes a stupid kind of cycle. I mean, why would you do that if you know you're being seen? Again, stealing the silverware, what it feels like. So Richard says, when the illusion finally shatters, what remains isn't disappointment. It's humiliation. The man you poured your fate. Now, this, I believe, is aimed at people who are, in fact, in this middle ground.

Starting point is 01:51:40 I believe it's a smaller group, that's a minority, not the team sport blind followers, not the people that are seeing through it entirely, but there's a group that's still kind of in the middle. There's always that. The man you poured your faith into was never a visionary, never a savior, never even remotely exceptional. It was a hollow fraud, wrapped an ego, fueled by noise,

Starting point is 01:51:57 and sustained by endless self-promotion. Guys, this could rely to any partisan left-right president going back as far as you want to look, in my opinion. Every boast, every grand promise, every display of swagger crumbles, the instant reality enters the room. Now, a special sort of slant towards Trump's arrogance, but I still agree with the first point. What looks like confidence was arrogance.

Starting point is 01:52:16 What looks like strength was insecurity. What looks like leadership was more than a carefully marketed illusion. Scratch beneath the surface and there's no hidden brilliance, no master strategist, no misunderstood genius, just an impulsive, self-absorbed figure, stumbling from one failure to the next, desperately trying to drown incompetence in a torrent of bluster and speculet and spectacle. Now, I wouldn't have even argued that this is what I thought Trump was in the beginning. I mean, even now, I believe that there's some cases where he gets kind of, there's, you know, there is a sort of sinister savviness to him in some cases.

Starting point is 01:52:47 I've said that for a long time. But I do feel this way at this point. Like today, looking back, he's, his track, it's a track record speaks for itself. This guy is a master bluster who has now lost the ability to bluster. In the end, the strong man image collapsed into exactly what it always was. Cheap theater. A gaudy performance. A character masquerading his leadership, a salesman pedaling an image he could never

Starting point is 01:53:09 live up to. And the hardest part isn't watching the act fall apart. It's realizing how long you applauded it, defended it. And this took obvious BS for substance. Nobody can do it like me. Nobody can do it like me. Honestly. Nobody's stronger than me. Nobody has better toys than I do. There's nobody bigger or better at the military than I am. Nobody loves the Bible more than I do. Nobody builds walls better than me. Nobody's better to people with disabilities than me. Nobody's fighting for the veterans like I'm fighting for the veterans. There's nobody that's done so much for equality as I have. There's nobody more pro-Israel than I am.

Starting point is 01:53:47 There's nobody more conservative than me. There is nobody that respects women more than I do. Nobody would be tougher on ISIS than Donald Trump. There's nobody's ever had crowds like Trump's had. There's nobody that understands the horror of nuclear better than me. And nobody even understands it but me. It's called devaluation. The sale of the uranium that nobody knows what it means.

Starting point is 01:54:11 I know what it means. Nobody knows what it means. Nobody knows more about trade than me. Nobody knows the game better than I do. Nobody's in the history of this country has ever known so much about infrastructure as Donald Trump. I know the H-1B. I know the H-2B. Nobody knows it better than me. Nobody knows politicians better than I do.

Starting point is 01:54:28 Nobody knows more about taxes than I do. Nobody knows more about debt than I do. Nobody knows the system better than me, which is why I alone can fix it. Hmm. Well, it worked for some people, certainly, especially before. he got into a position where he showed you that he was failing. But, you know, people will look over a lot of stuff. Like I talk about people close to me, you know, that I saw go through this.

Starting point is 01:54:51 And Iran was the line. Why Stargate wasn't for somebody who fought tooth and nail to stop those COVID shots? I don't know. But it wasn't. Iran was enough. And like I told you, he recently told me that everyone he knows sports Trump has given up on him. From some people that have drive their trucks with Trump flags. Like major Trump supporters, guys, that's the person I'm talking about.

Starting point is 01:55:11 And I've seen through it. I just, I really will continue to hit that. I think that's important that we see. I think that we're already seeing the next manipulation on the heels of the awareness of this. As always, guys, not always, it's not just one done, one and done, right? We won, it's over.

Starting point is 01:55:25 When Trump won that first election, that's so many people that I saw as like, almost anarchists or libertarians were suddenly like, we did it. Trump won. It's over. And became like backdoor authoritarian status. It's weird, but people want to feel like they succeeded in some massive, we all do.

Starting point is 01:55:42 Don't we? We all want to feel that we've succeeded in our agendas. Got to question everything. But Chebebos points out, not one of them served their full term. A collection of half-wits, frauds, and clowns in the UK. I simply said something the U.S. and the UK share. Who benefits from having these incompetent buffoons and positions of power? Fill in the blank. I think it's the reason I frame it like that, whatever you think the answer is, I think this is being done.

Starting point is 01:56:07 I think we're watching this sort of like degradation. And I don't, I mean, part of me is like good. Just bring down the government apparatus. Show us the stupidity of what they are. But what I see on the heels of it or in the shadows is somebody waiting to take advantage of that. More government, more control in a worse direction. But by point, nonetheless, I think somebody is clearly kind of bringing this down.

Starting point is 01:56:30 That's my opinion. Now let's talk about Iran. I'll include this from the 15th. Trump's Iran deal is a veiled surrender and retreat for the United States. I still stand by that being obvious based on the memorandum understanding alone. Never to say that that was going to be the absolute. I never said that.

Starting point is 01:56:46 I think it's obvious. It was just a temporary thing stated with their direction as I reported every time we talked about it. I say that because there's plenty out there that act like simply acknowledging that they've failed within that is somehow buying into the narrative or believing Iran or trusting mainstream media. It's just the typical sort of spinning out of the partisans and team sport players online. The truth is, anyone paying attention has long since recognized that Trump is spinning out trying to avoid the obviousness of what this is.

Starting point is 01:57:11 at least right now. Because look, if we want to be honest about this, I think that's objectively where they are, but let's say Israel carries out some massive attack and they capitalize on that, that could spin things in a different direction. Doesn't mean that they weren't still in a position where Trump was desperately capitulated to Iran.

Starting point is 01:57:29 You could then look back and argue that he did that to get him in that position. That'd be a fair point. But now we're getting hypothetical and hypothetical. As of right now, the stance they're in is clear. What comes next? well, can always change something. Trump's Iran deal breaks down due to Lebanon and U.S. blockade violations. So this was on the 19th, the last show.

Starting point is 01:57:49 And what we've been telling you since April, well after that, and the very last moment before this part came was that guess what, it's going to be blockade in Lebanon. Anybody else paying attention was saying the same, because it was obvious that it was the number one in the deal, includes Lebanon, Trump signed it, the whole thing, and then Israel didn't do it. So obviously, the blockade was the first aspect of it.

Starting point is 01:58:08 Now, that has changed since then, but that was, they dragged their heels on that and Iran called it out. And so those were both trip-ups in this recent situation. Now, the 19th, 20, 21st, and today, we're right back where we ultimately started in this last little segment, where now they've split and Iran is calling them out for Lebanon. Now, see, the point is that somebody not watching this every day, we'll say, isn't that where we already work? Well, the lot has happened in between.

Starting point is 01:58:32 So if you care, let's get into that. Because it does matter to me. This is an ongoing process. And what they keep, you know, Trump's saying we won and it's over and the deal's there. and then it keeps cycling around, people just sort of tune out. Maybe that's by design. So on the 21st, this I couldn't believe, because realize we were seeing this where Trump even spoke up from the White House account on true social and said, Israel needs to stop bombing Lebanon.

Starting point is 01:58:56 They didn't care. They're publicly saying they don't care. They're going to do it anyway. They're actually bombing even harder. But what happened next kind of surprised me, even for Trump. Because at that point, you've already put your name out there as going, stop doing that, right? And so then you're expecting what? The next step was either to, I guess, fully line up with what Israel wants or to step

Starting point is 01:59:16 further and say Israel, we're going to stop funding you. We're going to stop giving you bombs for your genocide if you don't do what we want because they can't. And they would have that ability because the U.S. gives them damn everything. But he didn't do that. Here's what he posted instead. Iran must immediately stop. Their highly paid proxies, what he means is Hezbollah, not a proxy in Lebanon, from causing

Starting point is 01:59:38 trouble. If they don't, we'll hit Iran very hard again. Bomb them is what he means, just like we did last week, only harder. Okay. In the midst of an alleged ceasefire negotiation, rather a memorandum of understanding, which will lead to a potential ceasefire, he said, I'll bomb you, which, by the way, was, I think, number two, a violation of the agreement. You can't make this up. In the memorandum of understanding, one of them was you cannot level threats of violence when they're in, and if you do, then this alleviate, and here we are. he doesn't care but even then irons still seems to be somewhat engaging even as of right now but the real point stands out is the obvious point of lebanon and and and the proxies so you've been

Starting point is 02:00:19 going israel stop bombing everyone paying attention can see that hesbollah was not responding until they were being bombed that's not a secret guys this again this is not gaza they stood up and said we acknowledge the ceasefire rather the you know temporary ceasefire whatever the term you want to use appropriately and hopes that this memorandum goes forward. And then Israel said, we don't care and kept bombing. And so right then he goes,

Starting point is 02:00:46 Iran, stop Hezbollah from bombing. That's weak. That shows you beyond a shadow of a doubt in my mind that he chose to just shift narratives from Israel stop bombing to Hezbollah stop responding and defending yourselves because Iran bad guy, he fell in hard, guys.

Starting point is 02:01:02 He's showing you what side he's on. Israel all the way. I think that never changed. I think the rest is narrative. Iran's embassy from Turkey says, first, learn never to use the word must when addressing Iran. Second, the United States must immediately restrain its rabid dog in the region, the terrorist Israel regime. If you don't, you'll add yet another defeat to your growing record of failures against Iran. So it's so obvious what side at least believes they hold the cards.

Starting point is 02:01:29 And it's the one that just never backs down seemingly once. So I think that's super important because what he did was shown the world that we're going to shift back into saying no matter what happens, it's Iran's fault. Israel clearly saw that, as if they even needed to. I believe there was already aware of whatever game they were playing. So back to the point earlier, of those that were going, where'd all the Israel shills, now, you know, where all people out there claiming Israel controls everything now? Look at how Trump was angry. Oh yeah, that we were. Hook, line and sinker, ladies and gentlemen, just like Alex Jones, I told you they were going to split. I told you. And they didn't. And then they didn't

Starting point is 02:02:03 again, as he did it again second time. Now, I've always argued that it's possible, like I keep saying, that there is a breaking point, I don't think that's where we are, and I wouldn't assume that's where we are until I could verify that, but ton of them out there used the opportunity to say, see, you all hate Jews, and that's why you're doing that. Not the case. It was the obvious reality that Israel was doing these things, and clearly is not actually split like you pretend, at least not as it seems emotionally or dividing. I don't think they like each other. But when it comes to the agenda, I do believe they're very much on the same side. So Trump appears to be threatening to kill Iran's negotiators while they're in Switzerland. So 11 a.m. on the 21st. And Trump says you,

Starting point is 02:02:44 you close it and you won't have a country after they threatened to close the straight because of their violations because they're bombing Lebanon, right? Which would be justified based on their perception of this because they argue that it was open aloud because they were agreeing based on the memorandum, which was number one, stop Lebanon bombing. And so they said, we'll threaten that. And then Trump says, you close it and you won't have a country. You want to even be able to make it back to your country is what he said. Excuse me. Hickups all of a sudden.

Starting point is 02:03:13 To me, I agree with Dave. That's obvious that you're threatening the negotiators in the room. And so this is my, so right here is where it turns into Iran going, how dare you threaten us in the middle of this process? We're going to walk. So, well, first, J.D. Van says what we were told, but the Iranian yesterday is that you guys engage in us in what millennials might call trash talk. You can't expect the president of the United States not to respond and not to correct the record.

Starting point is 02:03:41 So what he's trying to do is pretend that Trump going, I'll kill you all if you don't do what I tell you, is responding to trash. What was the trash talk, Vance? Funny how he doesn't mention that. What was the trash talk? We'll close the straight because you're violating the agreement. That's trash talk, apparently. Now, what he's doing is trying to make it sound like Iran was talking dirty to Trump and telling trash talk.

Starting point is 02:04:00 And Trump just responded and that's what men do. That's how pathetic this is. That's not what happened. he's trying to cover for Trump. Simple as that. As Aaron writes, Trump threatened to assassinate their negotiators. That's what happened.

Starting point is 02:04:14 And this is him trying to act like, well, you know, no big deal. They were just kind of talking back and forth. Well, Iran on the 21st reported at 2 p.m. Iran says, and I'll go through what actually happened, they didn't technically fully leave, and I'll show you what happened. Iran says its negotiating delegation will not return to Switzerland talks

Starting point is 02:04:32 until Trump personally apologizes for his threats. today and Israel fully withdraws from southern Lebanon. With Iran's delegation plane already repositioned to Zurich ready to fly back to Tehran. This comes after Trump told Fox shortly before True Social Post that if Iran closes the street, you won't have a country and threatens their negotiators. Now, I believe what happened here is that ultimately something was said. A concession was given because ultimately they didn't leave. They did leave.

Starting point is 02:05:01 And you can prove this. It was about an hour and a half where they didn't come back to the main. meeting room, but eventually did. Now, it's certainly possible that Iran just decided to anyway. They've shown them that that much restraint many times over this process, but I think, personally, my opinion, is that something was given, like it was given every time before this. The last time, Trump gave him three concessions to stop them from bombing Israel in response to

Starting point is 02:05:24 Israel bombing Iran, right? And that one of them was about the straight. One of them was money. So in this case, I believe what happened was they walked out and demanded something and they gave them something. And so they came back. an hour and a half later. My point was first with that even being done,

Starting point is 02:05:42 clearly Trump holds all the cards, right? If Iran is just willing to walk out and willing to gain things, I mean, the whole process continues to show you that they, at the very least, believe that they have all the cards to use Trump's analogy. Now, they were,

Starting point is 02:05:54 Khabisi later post this, first, this one, the same report. The Iranian negotiator delegation has left the negotiation venue. Now, they did leave the main room. That was publicly reported. Iran calls the threats of violation of the memorandum. They were. Because it stated verbatim in it that you can't do that exact thing. And Trump signed it. So whenever you think about that state, the point, he did sign it. And so that was a

Starting point is 02:06:17 violation. Now, they follow up later and says new footage actually captured the moment when Iranian delegation supposedly left the negotiation in protest. J.D. Vance proceeds to speak with Pakistani prime minister following the Iranians exit. Now, because of my point, it's clear that they did leave. hour and a half later they come back. We can decide what happened within all of that. But what I find interesting is the way that J.D. Vans tries to frame this. Saying, I kind of kind of funny that the social media firestorm, everybody said the Iranians are going to leave. Then we proceeded to talk for the next nine hours.

Starting point is 02:06:49 Well, it's funny how you leave out the part where they literally did leave for an hour and a half until you somehow convince them to come back to the room. But see, this is what you get from politicians, guys. It's about the lie. And just to be clear, this is not their word versus his. There are plenty of other people in the room. they just can't stop lying to make themselves look like they're somehow in control. That's got to be the weakest thing I've ever seen. Iran walks out of peace talks at the Trump outburst.

Starting point is 02:07:14 It says, Mr. Trump threatened to restart the bombing campaign on Iran in, you know, the post we showed you, threatening to bomb them, might not even make it home. Iran immediately lodged a formal complaint with Pakistani and Qatari mediators and left the talks. The chief negotiator, Ghalibov, said the U.S. should be careful with its statements and that our armed forces are ready to respond. It says here, if it is understood that the talks never even reach the stage of discussing Iran's nuclear program. Instead, Iran insisted on ensuring the memorandum of understanding was implemented properly. So this is supposed to be the stage at which they begin to talk about those secondary things. Iran is saying, no.

Starting point is 02:07:50 So they're in control. That's what everybody else is responding with. That's what happened. They say, we're not going to discuss that yet. We need to make sure that this is still even going on. That's where they are right now. Because they're still bombing Lebanon. on Israel still doing so, and there's multiple smaller versions of things that they are flirting

Starting point is 02:08:05 with violating this agreement, one of them being Trump threatening them. On Sunday night, which was yesterday, there was paralysis in the strait of Hormuz once again. Funny way to frame that, it means that Iran put its foot down and they stop people coming through because of what Trump was doing. Now, in the meantime, over the 20th, the 21st, the 22nd, the U.S. government was going, we're great, everything's flowing. There's no hindrances, and you could prove that was not true. I don't know how that's not desperate.

Starting point is 02:08:32 Only a single small tanker crossed the waterway with its location signaling transponders on after Iran's announcement. Compared with dozens of ships in recent days when traffic had become returning to pre-war levels. Begone returning. When you look at it, it didn't get close enough. It wasn't more than ever, even though Trump said that. They began

Starting point is 02:08:48 to start picking up again, but then they violated their agreement. Iran's Farras news agency cited a military source is saying on Sunday that no new permits were being issued. That was yesterday, for ships to cross to further notice. Throughout the war, shipping firms have said it is too dangerous to traverse without Iran's permission. Iran said there could be no start to the next phase of talks, including its nuclear program,

Starting point is 02:09:10 until, can you guess, they stop bombing Lebanon, just like people who have been paying attention have been telling you since April because it has not changed. So this is from today, shipping stalls in Strait of Ramos after Iran declares Keywaterway closed again. Now, that's as if I went live, that seems to be in the reality. I'm sure things, it's a fluid situation. genuinely can change based on decisions being made in the moment. But as up right now, last I checked, it is still being at least strongly restricted,

Starting point is 02:09:37 if not close entirely to anybody they're fighting with. And I think at this moment entirely, based on the fact that they're doing almost in reverse what Trump and Netanyahu are trying to do. Saying you did this, we're shutting it down, but it's now your fault because you broke the deal. And it's kind of working because the people are seeing that Trump and the U.S. Israeli agenda

Starting point is 02:09:56 are the reason this thing is deliberately failing. But again, on the 21st, So literally on the very moment you could prove this was not happening, this guy goes out and says from the White House account, ships are going through the strain of Hormuz in terms of oil and products. It's equal to where we were before the conflict. That's the narrative anyway. Wasn't true.

Starting point is 02:10:13 Trump went on and said it's more than ever before, as he always does. And it wasn't true. As I said, just to outright lie about this when we can all see their lying is simply desperate. I don't know what else to call it. Eric Doughty says in a massive win, President Trump reveals he just got through more oil. in the street than ever recorded, you know, because Trump said it, right? So Eric says, the thing that Trump said is fact, no matter how often that turns out not to be. Fact, Trump says, I love making fun of these clowns because it's just the same old circular

Starting point is 02:10:44 nonsense. It never stops. So you can, if you can look it up for yourself, you can look at pre-war numbers, compare it to what you can prove went through. You can do whatever you want. It's obvious that this is not the reality, but they yell it out anyway. On top of that, we have a oil gusher. The straits totally open. Trump says. It's not, though. And it wasn't before this. You know, it's just sad. Here is Dropsite News, and this is Professor Marsheimer talking about this discussion and the Strait of Hormuz and the nonsense that they're spewing, he says. What do you make of Trump's warning today? He said this on the Fox News program, that the United States could become, quote, the guardian angel of the Strait of Hormuz, even suggesting that America might one day assume, responsibility for securing the waterway and collect tolls on the oil and the gas passing through

Starting point is 02:11:37 it. Can you, I mean, think about how insane it is for that to be his pivot. Just like the idea of saying Hezbollah has to stop bombing as you just were telling us that Israel is. It's at least both of them, but what you can prove is that Israel was the one and openly saying that. And Hezbollah was openly saying we're willing to go along with the ceasefire, right? In this case, that you sign a document that says that you're going to allow that very dynamic and then just turn around and go, maybe we'll charge a toll. He's a petulant child. I don't understand how even doesn't laugh about that.

Starting point is 02:12:10 Of course, he could just do it. But then what's the point of making any agreements? Well, there lies the issue, guys, they don't care about anything. They will just do whatever they want, whatever they want. This is a pretense to get you in a position. That's what this is what this government has always done. So now, case you didn't see it, he's now simply arguing, maybe we'll charge a toll. Maybe we'll, if you don't open it like we want, then we're going.

Starting point is 02:12:29 going to do X, Y, and Z, even though there's a document they signed that walks this in a very clear direction. And they're still bombing Lebanon. He's openly threatening them, violating it in two public, very clear ways. You know, you just can't miss this. I'm of the mind that people are not stupid and they can see this. Most of the authority around the world seems to be either choosing to ignore it or a part of the lie. You do with that what you will. I think that's pretty clear. John, he's just bloviating. This is this is nonsense. We just bought a war. and we couldn't take control of the straight. How is he now going to take control the straight?

Starting point is 02:13:06 This is just not going to happen. Well, I do want to point out, though, and I agree with him, to be very clear. I agree. I think it's just bluster to get a better position. But if we're going to be very honest about this, I mean, the U.S. and Israel could, let's just hypothetically say, nuke the country.

Starting point is 02:13:22 Hope to God, that doesn't happen. But that's not as crazy it may sound with the people we're dealing with, especially Israel and the Samson option and the, you know, Dahara, knowing the lawn and the Hannibal directive, means what they do, guys. So what I mean, though, is that it shouldn't be so casually dismissed that they could just decide to take this to another level, seeing that they might go to prison if they fail.

Starting point is 02:13:43 You see what I mean? That it ultimately then could pivot in a different direction, even if they were failing because they decided to just go full evil about it, which is what Israel does. So I think that's worth pointing out. But I do agree with them, though. I think if they don't decide to go that far, I do believe it's bluster. And furthermore, if he tries to take control of the strait, the war will escalate in ways that will expedite how fast we're moving toward the precipice.

Starting point is 02:14:10 He would be insane to try to take the strength. So he's just blowing a lot of hot air today. And this is, you know, vintage Trump. He's frustrated. He's getting hammered by the lobby and by Israel, as I said. and he doesn't like to admit the fact that this is really a case of unconditional surrender. You remember, he called early on for unconditional surrender, but what he didn't understand in the beginning was that it was be us,

Starting point is 02:14:40 the United States, that surrendered unconditionally, not the Iranians. And he's frustrated by that. You can understand it. And in typical Trump fashion, he's lashing out. But the question you have to ask yourself again is, What alternative does he have to settling this conflict? Yep. Well said.

Starting point is 02:15:03 I completely agree. I just hope it doesn't get pushed to a dangerous degree. You know, I think this is, you know, I'm going to call it unconditional surrender. There's clearly conditions, but they're just giving them. I mean, every, I mean, we don't need to go through all this. I think anybody who's not dishonest or shockingly uninformed is already aware that, you know, can't say no missiles and then say, but they get some missiles. So say no program, but now they give a civilian program. Those are concessions.

Starting point is 02:15:28 You are doubling, you are turning 180 degrees on what you said you were going to do. So those are giving into things that you said would never happen because you clearly are not in a winning position. It's just basic deductive logic. So here is a, this is just a, comer, just typical ridiculous partisan politics and just saying the thing we know isn't true. And he says if, if, you know, basically if we end up in a position where we are exactly where this was before the war, then the U.S. wins. That's their stance. It couldn't be a more embarrassing failure of a stance than that.

Starting point is 02:16:01 And if we have inspectors going in there, and if that straight is open for business and get, all is flowing, then I think it's very clear the United States will have won this conflict. Yeah, that the street, that's kind of one of the big ifs there. Hmm. Great insightful journalism from them. But, of course, well, there were inspectors before this. That's a fact.

Starting point is 02:16:26 I'll go to that next. And they only stopped because they started bombing them. That's a fact. And the straight was open before this. Anybody honest? And there's tons of people making those points out there. It's not some, you know, hot take. Everyone's, I mean, I can't stop seeing those takes.

Starting point is 02:16:39 I'm glad to see that. People see this. This is what it was like before. Not even getting into the nuclear conversation because Trump seems to be okay. Just kicking it down the road now. No big deal, even though it was no, no, no, no, we'll do that later. It's just how embarrassing. The overall reality, this is the overall reality.

Starting point is 02:16:55 though is clearly this is the pre-war reality that you're framing as the win. That's pathetic. Now, let's talk about this in regard to the straight itself. Now, Brandon Whitechart here points out that this is just important to realize. This just comes to the idea of the strategic reserve that ultimately, as marginally green highlights, our strategic petroleum reserves are historically low sitting at approximately 340 million barrels. The SPR hasn't been this low since 1983. the U.S. uses between 20 and 23 million barrels a day. Their SPR is extremely low because Trump released 172 million barrels during Iran War and Biden released 180 million during the Russia, Ukraine War, both of which are still going on.

Starting point is 02:17:38 If America has so much oil, why are Americans paying this price for wars that we don't support? Good question. Now, this person, just simply how that's a story with the link down here you can read for yourself, that makes at least the argument. And I do agree with this, that basically based on the way these are still, stored, that there's going to be a level of like degradation. And so their argument is 340 million of the oil barrels ultimately pan out to being about 100 million barrels based on the way that's the way they're stored and so on. So just based on that, that would mean if you're doing 20 million

Starting point is 02:18:06 a day, I mean, guys, you have a very small window where you might run out. And that becomes just the market. That's what you have. And that's been done because of what the U.S. government has been doing to achieve Israel's agendas. It's insane. Now, Trump says, the U.S. will begin charging tools and spread it for Moose if final deal not reached. I just should have had it one step over, but that's simply arguing right there that will take control, which is a violation of the agreement that they had. And Lindsey Graham says, Obloiterate Iran if there's straight of Hormuz resistance.

Starting point is 02:18:43 I just, I had these poorly organized. We're going to get into next is the argument about the inspections and the idea of the International Atomic Energy Agency and how that actually stopped. Before that, Lindsay Graham, he says, asked if he agrees with Cruz and Corny, Corny, as well as Louisiana, Cassidy, all wary about sending U.S. funds to Iran about their public comments. Bottom line was, where did I have that highlighted?

Starting point is 02:19:10 Damn, and it went away. The simple point is that he's saying that, you know, we need to step in there and take control if they do anything to stop us. The money Iran gets is not going to change the future of Iran. It's not enough to reconstruct its country. Rest of now, it's okay to say money can go, but it's not enough to really change anything. So anyway, the point was just simply about Lindsey Graham threatening them if they don't get what they want on the back of a deal that's supposed to be giving them that.

Starting point is 02:19:34 Now, back to the point, a little disjointed about the International Atomic Energy Agency and the idea of the straight itself. Or excuse me, in regard to the, excuse me, the nuclear civilian program and the inspection of it and the deal itself, the straight being one part of it. Under President Donald Trump's and vice president, Vance's leadership, I guess he's saying there, we continue to make the world's, safer and more prosperous, says Besant. Hardly. I don't think anybody actually believes that. In line, I mean, even people support them are not arguing that right now. In line with the ongoing productive talks in Switzerland, not even remotely productive, as right now they're stalled and they're not talking, Iran has committed to free and open transit the Strait of Pramuse. Guys, this is as it's closed. It's not a joke.

Starting point is 02:20:18 And to permit the International Atomic Energy Agency inspectors to their country. So both everyone in their administration is now framing inspectors going in and the street being open as the win that we promised, both of which were happening beforehand. It's obvious. As part of the framework, Treasury has issued a temporary 60-day general license of authorizing the production, delivery, and sale of oil. So understand this. As they know that they've closed the straight and as they know that they're violating

Starting point is 02:20:45 the deal from the U.S. side, they still give them the 60-day window to sell oil right now. And that's what Graham was talking about. Either the money side or the rest of it, it's okay, it's not going to be used for enough to hurt us. You guys went on telling us they were terrorists and monsters and this money was going to be used for terrorism. And then you just give them more and let them sell oil.

Starting point is 02:21:06 It shows you that they were lying one side of the other, guys. You take your pick. It makes my point. The truth is they've always been lying about these people. So Iran has committed to doing exactly what it was doing before the war. And Trump gives them concessions for it. It's obviously who holds the cards here. Trump says everybody is fully aware that Ron will agree to have major.

Starting point is 02:21:27 weapons inspections in order to ensure nuclear honesty, right, like they were doing before. Yeah, see, JCPOA laughing in the corner. Okay, well, Eric Dowderty says J.D. Vance has successfully gotten Iran to agree to nuclear inspectors. They're all doing this. Donald Trump, Jr. A lot of people who were pushing lies and propaganda about the talks failing yesterday look really stupid right now. Why? Because you got Iran to agree to something. they've always said they would agree to. They've never stopped saying they would agree to that.

Starting point is 02:22:00 I mean, this is just, this is absolute desperation. Or I guess you could argue that they're all so too stupid to know that was not the case, but realized from a government's level, like from what their agenda is, they have utterly failed and they know that. So now they're just trying to frame what they were doing in the first place as the reality, as the win. And here, Jady Van says, we made a lot of good progress. Nobody thinks that.

Starting point is 02:22:23 They've said the opposite. the Iranians agreed to invite the inspectors back into their country. This is a major milestone for the American people. Well, let's prove you that they're lying to you. First, just to state the reality, the last International Atomic Energy Agency inspection of Iran's facilities was in February 26, which we talked about. Why did those inspections stop?

Starting point is 02:22:44 Because the U.S. and Israel started attacking in Iran. 12-day war. So this is the return to what Iran was freely doing before they were illegally attacked. another fake win for Trump. Aha, except for the fact that not even that is now being agreed to by Iran because of all this. This is just almost humorous in a macabre sort of way. I'll show you what I mean by that.

Starting point is 02:23:04 So right now, even if this was the reality, that's not a win for Trump. You've gotten back what you already had. And so what happening right now is as they're framing that as the win, Iran is saying, we're not going to do that. We're not even discussing nuclear until 60 days from now. We haven't agreed to that, which isn't the same as saying they won't, but they have all the cards. They could literally decide not to do that right now. And there's no reason they should have to. There's no legal standing to say that one country versus the other has no right to invest in

Starting point is 02:23:31 nuclear technology. No matter what you think about it, even if you have a valid argument, that's not the law. Simple. Here is the post from the International Atomic Energy Agency, February 27th, 26. You could read it all for yourself. This is the exact report documenting what we've been telling you, which is the UN nuclear watchdog says it's unable to verify whether Iran is suspended all uranium enrichment. Sounds terrible, doesn't it? Until you read the article, and what you find out is they bombed them on the 28th, and then we've been yet to go, we haven't been able to go back. That's all it means. And what they've done is taking advantage of people that don't understand this. And again, AP, even the International Atomic Energy Agency as an institution, are clearly

Starting point is 02:24:14 slanted and manipulated towards Israel's agenda as we keep highlighting. But here's what it says. 27th of February, Iran has not allowed the United Nations nuclear agency access to its nuclear facilities bombed by Israel and the United States during a 12-day war in June. According to a confidential report by the watchdog circulated two member states and seen Friday by the Associated Press. Remember, this is one day before they were bombed again. So at this point, what they're saying is ever since they bombed us or ever since Iran was bombed, they, we have not been able to inspect it. The report from the IAEA stressed that it, quote, cannot verify whether Iran has suspended

Starting point is 02:24:57 all enrichment related activity or the size of Iran's uranium stockpile with the affected nuclear facilities. Now, what that means, it sounds all big and scary. It can't verify because it hasn't been able to go there. Not because that's a big, earth-shattering development. They're just simply saying stressed AP ads. All they simply said was, as we've been routinely doing, going and, and, you know, confirming that they haven't done what they, you know, what they've agreed not to do.

Starting point is 02:25:21 Right now, we can't verify that because we haven't been allowed back in because they're at war. So you could say stressed, but or, you know, can't bear this is turned into people like by Whitkoff and other idiots that make it sound like Iran is skirting the reality and hiding from the truth. It's not what's happening. Or the size of it. Why? Because we don't know how, really what it means is that it might have been diminished or they bombed these locations.

Starting point is 02:25:45 But it says because of the lack of access. why? Because they're at war, and even the International Atomic Energy Agency has acknowledged that. The report stressed that they'll quote, loss of continuity of knowledge needs to be addressed with the utmost urgency, simply meaning that since we haven't been there since June, we need to get back there to verify it. This is the report that I was showing you repeatedly. That's what they say in June 20th, 2025, which is right after, right, they're simply saying, well, we haven't been able to inspect it since they've been in the midst of this war. But we can confirm, as I've shown you a thousand times, that what they're doing is, at last they checked,

Starting point is 02:26:21 which was still 60% at 400 kilograms or 1,000 pounds, is and remains under safeguards in accordance with their agreement. No matter which angle you look at it, this has always been within their agreement and in accordance with their safeguards. The only point being made is that they need to get back in there to continue to confirm it like they always have. That's what this is. Now it says the International Atomic Energy Agency reported that Iran had informed the agency.

Starting point is 02:26:51 Iran reached out to them and said on February 2nd that normal safeguards were, quote, legally untenable and materially impractable as a result of the threats of active aggression. We're in the midst of a war. That's not going to happen right now. That's what they're saying. The confidential report also said Friday that Iran did provide access to the International Atomic Energy Agency inspectors, quote, to each of the unaffected nuclear facilities at least once since June 2025, with the expectation of a power plant at Quran that is under construction, meaning that the locations that were bombed by US and Israel were not accessed. We're not given access to. Now, right there, you could argue if they're hiding something, but these are sites that were being investigated and checked and investigated up until they bombed them.

Starting point is 02:27:39 So the ultimate reality is we're talking about things that Trump said were obliterated, things that we know like the enrichment facility were in fact destroyed and buried. So the way you frame this can make it sound like it's some kind of secret or you could realize that it's a buried facility that nobody can access. The confidential report also said Friday that Iran did provide access to the one they could. Iran is legally obliged to cooperate with the IEA under the treaty on the nonproliferation of nuclear weapons. The one that Israel does not take a part in. The one that the U.S. does and ignores. but suspended all cooperation after the war with Israel.

Starting point is 02:28:14 See how that's framed, the way they make that sound. They're still in cooperation, the idea that this is somehow a breakaway dynamic. It is, we're at war, we're not dealing with us right now. And we're not dealing with a dynamic that was created by the people at war with us. Because like the idea simply is that Iran is engaged with this in the checks and balances of it all, even though they don't want nuclear weapon because they want this to be something that goes away. That's my opinion, but I think that's historically pretty easy to see. So the discussion is you don't need their mechanisms to do something you don't want to do anyway.

Starting point is 02:28:44 So you're at war with us. F off. We don't want you around. This is them showing you they were willing to cooperate until you bomb them. It becomes so in painfully clear. And it's not good guy, bad guy. It's just acknowledging the reality of the circumstances. So again, as I've shown you in this one, this is what they did.

Starting point is 02:29:03 They lied. They came out and said they were hiding the 60% of a thousand minutes. They were just trying to hype the idea of something that was on the record and within their safeguard and as some kind of secret dynamic because of the way they set this up. And it worked for a lot of people, but not enough. Oh, and this was in case you needed it, right? Because these are source documents that we can show you directly to these locations. But for some who want to doubt, like this is why I always found funny.

Starting point is 02:29:29 I went to this last time where I say, look at what the IAEA was saying. And somebody who was pointing to what Whitkoff said were said, you believe them, so you end without even realizing that the 60% number and 1,000 pounds that Whitkoff cited came from the International Atomic Energy Agency. So they were citing the same group and then calling me out for citing that group. You just can't make up the stupidity of partisans. But my point is that some of them may decide to listen to Elon's bot more than anybody else and says right here, when was the last time the International Atomic Energy Agency

Starting point is 02:30:02 inspected Iran's facilities, which we've been posting for a long time now, but in case you want to see it specifically right before. 14, 15th February. And now that was the ones that they were looking. There was the ones that were bombed in the 12th day war discussion that were access to. But the reality is simply that they had been doing this. And it was because they were willing participants in this engagement.

Starting point is 02:30:24 Even after Trump pulled away from the JCPOA, they still maintained an agreement with this group. Why would they do that? You can answer your own question. That's obvious. And I said, why did they stop? Primarily due to the war from Israel and the United States. Very simple. Now, back to the point is even if Trump said, even what Trump was saying was the case,

Starting point is 02:30:47 that would still be a loss for him because it goes back to square one. But on top of that, as of today, Iran at least is claiming that that's not true. Iran rejects Fancy's claim that it approved the return of the inspectors. Now, you see again, that could be weaponized. And like I said, very well may be the reality. They may say, we never want that again. And they're well within the rights, both internationally and every other possible way. But the reality being is that I kind of get the sense that that's more of a right now moment. But I guess we'll find out.

Starting point is 02:31:15 But the law applies equally, doesn't it? And so the idea that they're somehow bound by this and nobody else is makes no sense whatsoever. And they are in a position leverage-wise to make that call. But I think what's interesting is that ultimately it comes down to this is a right now situation, my opinion, is that we're not going to do it

Starting point is 02:31:31 because you continually push us, you continue to threaten us. So why are we going to give you something that you claim you just gain? I mean, it could even be them saying no just to spin out the Trump administration when they have every intention of actually doing it when the conversation comes 60 days from now. See my point? But it says Iran on Monday disputed that Vance's assertion that they had allowed that.

Starting point is 02:31:51 And Ron's media reporting that no such approval has been granted. Same point comes to the other conversation. Bance says he pushes back on misreporting about Iran's assets potentially being unfrozen and says that if any of them are freed up, which some of them already have been, by the way, it'll be making U.S. farmers rich. We wanted to make sure that we set up a process where if we ever unfreeze them, which you can act like it's somehow a distant thing that may not happen, it's absolutely part of the deal.

Starting point is 02:32:19 We can assure that that money will not go to funding terrorism, which, as far as I can tell, it never did. If it gets unfrozen, it will go to American wheat and corn. Okay. Well, there is an overlap in this where there's a discussion of where they could channel it towards American goods. But first of all, you're still giving them billions of dollars, wherever it comes from.

Starting point is 02:32:37 So that's a failure from what Trump said he was doing. Giving money to the group that you call terrorists is not a win. But on top of that, this is ultimately money that's there anyway.

Starting point is 02:32:46 And we're talking about the not the $300 billion from the Middle East elements or wherever it comes from, but the money that's already theirs. The $26 billion that's frozen that is theirs, some in Qatar,

Starting point is 02:32:56 some other locations, right? And so what he's saying is that we get to dictate that. That's not how that works. The unfrozen funds are not there to dictate. What he's doing is conflating the $300 billion,

Starting point is 02:33:05 which they then would, get to dictate on how that goes in some cases. They're playing you either. Either Vance is actually unaware of this or he is playing you because people don't understand how this works. But he's also wrong entirely. As Saeed Mohammed Morandi points out, Iran is not planning to purchase U.S. agricultural goods. And there was no discussions yesterday regarding the inspectors to Iran.

Starting point is 02:33:27 Ignore Western propaganda. Question him too, though, right? All I simply said was at least considered that what he just said is true. Why? Because he's been right about every other thing he's posted. it. That doesn't mean you should trust the next thing he says. Question everybody. But if you go back and look at what he's been saying, I've only seen about two times where what he said didn't turn out to be the reality. And I would even argue that was because of some different deviation of where the

Starting point is 02:33:50 discussion went. But his track record, he's been right. He's been telling you and they stood by what they said and Trump spins out. It's the same old thing round and round. But even on top of that, you have Tehran themselves denying that frozen funds will happen or rather that they will be earmarked for grain purchases. So who's to say, guys, if you want to look at who's consistently been lying, well, that's the U.S. government so far. So there you can consider that. But overall, I think it's more of a deviation meant to embarrass the Trump administration

Starting point is 02:34:15 because they don't hold the cards. As Ryan Rosbionni points out, in general, Tehran is making this clear. They've said they've rejected reports that are wrong about the inspectors and the food. They're simply saying this is not the reality. Now, I'll bring this up again. Now, this article is not the best example because what it really highlights is the kind of discrepancy between when. But as we already showed,

Starting point is 02:34:38 this is financial times on the 18th. Iran gets access to $6 billion of frozen funds. And it says two by U.S. goods. So this is my point. Same kind of thing, guys. What we're talking about is frozen funds that was floated as some kind of idea what it comes down to is that money that I can see,

Starting point is 02:34:57 I think $3 billion was already sent. Was already sent quietly behind the scenes. And I reported on this the last time. I don't believe they're being transparent about how this is going with damn here anything. And so I think we should be wondering whether or not a lot of this is happening behind the scenes. Money's already been given. Concessions are already being given. And a lot more of this is about trying to kind of frame this in some way that makes Trump not feel like he lost.

Starting point is 02:35:18 And in some ways how Iran might give him that just to make this end. But I think it's important to see how the money is actually going. And this is the 21st, Hormuz letter says Iran's foreign minister, Argochi, announces the U.S. has now launched the $300 billion reconstruction plan, waived all oil petrochemical exports. We did hear that part of it, lifted the naval blockade and released some frozen Iranian assets. So they're claiming this is already happening.

Starting point is 02:35:42 Extracting all of these items shortly before the delegation, walk out over Trump's assassination threat. And there you have it. So the argument being that Trump, they were about to walk out and they gave them concessions, which is they do this stuff right now. And then Trump and them came out and said, we did it.

Starting point is 02:35:56 We made the great. And that makes sense now, doesn't it? Even though ultimately Iran said, that's not even true. What we did is push you in a position to give us what we demand and you came and acted like you want everything else. Who's to say what's true? Iran could just as easily be lying.

Starting point is 02:36:10 Historically, you can see it's most likely the Trump administration at this moment. All parties also agreed to the roadmap to reach the final deal in 60 days. This roadmap won't start and Iran refuses to implement any commitments if Israel doesn't fully withdraw from Lebanon. Pretty simple. The first real test of the deal. Now on that point, by the way, this is actually a important point. This is a state, Argoschi is the one that made that point.

Starting point is 02:36:34 Say that. I got the weirdest pushback from somebody who was a follower on our, on the substack, who said it was way beneath me to use the word deal. I thought that was such an interesting thing to say. Because look, we talked about this on this show, that this, it's a memorandum of understanding. It's not, it's not binding. It's simply a statement of what will happen that might lead to an eventual ceasefire.

Starting point is 02:36:56 But using the Trump's Iran deal, like in the title, for example, it's weird how people in this field get like protective of like or like almost like word you know like you're not allowed to say these terminologies you can't frame it like this you can't use the word trumped it and just it's so it's just weird to me because first of all the deal itself like in the conversation it's about making a deal you're dealing with somebody the term absolutely applies to the general concept of what's happening do i think this is the jCPO deal no but in using the context just like aragachi you just did right there, even though he knows and just stated above that it was a memorandum and not the deal. But it's a deal that's being worked on. I just want to point that out.

Starting point is 02:37:36 I think it was Patrick Kenningson. I saw make that argument first, which I agreed with. The word deal is not really anywhere in a vocabulary sense when it comes to international law. I agree with that. And I think the way Trump is using that term around the memorandum understanding is meant to be manipulative. So I even get the point of why that might be somewhat confusing. But the words have meaning. And so to try to like bend over backwards to avoid the term because Trump used it is almost exactly giving in to their control over language. I'd think it's worth pointing out. Really, guys, it is a deal that's happening.

Starting point is 02:38:08 Whether or not it's a memorandum, they're dealing around the memorandum. Like, that's what the word means. So let's just kind of pump the brakes on the kind of controlling of language around what team says what. I don't care about partisan teams. And I also made the point to say that to him in the comment. I said, look, I'm very, very deliberate with what I use, like in the titles. In the show, I can speak off the cuff.

Starting point is 02:38:28 I can say things more like without thinking them through. I mean, you look, my track we're going to doing that. I don't think I stand by almost everything I've done. But overall, my titles I'm very deliberate with. And you guys have noticed that. I'm very deliberate with how I use things. Even punctuation sometimes will make a point that I don't even comment on. Anyway, that being said, as he as, as Origachi says, the first real test of the deal.

Starting point is 02:38:49 And what he means is the memorandum understanding that might lead to a ceasefire. And the test is whether or not they stop bombing Lebanon. they have not. As of right now, they're not. Menjo Sitt points out, and this is in regard to sort of like the deflection and blaming of other people, he says Trump basically blames the New York Times for his defeat in Iran. And guys, we've been highlighting this since the beginning. How early on did Trump go, no matter what happens, I could be winning and then fake news would say I lost? And I was like, that's a weird thing to say.

Starting point is 02:39:22 And now I think we know why. I think he caught on just as early as we did that he was not winning in this conversation. And that's when he tried to sort of like change the dynamic. We saw that. So in this case, he says, as Vance or the article in New York Times, as Vance offers Iran outstretched hand in talks, Trump threatens bombing. And Trump says, the way the corrupt and failing New York Times is covering stories on a very battered and beat up Iran through fake and made up facts. It's funny. Fake and made up fat, you wouldn't need to put it in quotes.

Starting point is 02:39:53 If it's fake and made up facts, you don't need to put in quotes. Anyway, in my opinion, treasonous, in quotes. That's odd. So implying they're not treasonous. I will be adding all of their false and ridiculous reporting to my multi-billionaire lawsuit. So the president of the United States, the free speech administration is suing a news platform because they're reporting on things he doesn't like the way he doesn't like them. Now, I'm the first.

Starting point is 02:40:14 I'll tell you, Newark Times is completely not trustworthy. No mainstream platform is. It doesn't matter, though. They have a right to be wrong. They have a right to lie. That's free speech. Now look, you can sue them, right, for liable for, that's the dynamic, right?

Starting point is 02:40:27 F around and find out and all that. What we're talking about here is Donald Trump, not suing them for something you can prove, like he's not going after them for claims that we know are false. He's going after them, for example, saying that he lost the war or things that in other ways, I mean, anyway, I don't want to get pulled into this right now, but it's just insulting how they basically use things like that

Starting point is 02:40:46 to cover their own criminality. Like, I don't think the New York Times is trustworthy, but by claiming that somehow they're the reason they're not they're faking your loss you lost it's obvious you know that the world knows that this is just pathetic own it move forward glen highlighting what ericsson has to say the state department said last week that iran uses its oil revenue to fund terror today the united states is waiting restrictions on oil to sell oil they will fund terror and re-repanize i don't agree with that but the point is the same didn't trump just tell us they use oil to fund he did so now he's given them

Starting point is 02:41:22 oil. Okay. Well, there's only two ways to look at that. Or rather giving them the ability to sell their oil, which he shouldn't have had the ability to stop in the first place. There's only two ways to look at that. He either doesn't care that they're terrorists as long as he gets what he wants, in this case, the pretend that he didn't lose, or they were always lying about the fact that they were committing terrorism. I mean, there's only two ways to look at it like every the time we do this, right? Because if he's giving it to him, then he either doesn't care or he lied. I mean, you take your pick, guys. It's always the same game. It appears the goal of the Vance plan, again, the Vance plan, is to force the U.S. into isolation by funding Iran's

Starting point is 02:41:56 rearmament so we cannot attack them due to the missile shield they will build. Wow. Interesting. Well, Glenn rightly points out, how did all these neocons jointly decide that Trump's deal was with Iran should be, oh, it's deal, careful, should be called the Vance deal. That's an interesting point, right? So they can pretend that Trump somehow isn't involved in it and that criticizing the deal, therefore doesn't require criticism of Trump. Ah, see what you're getting into the team sport game? That's largely the Israel first fake America firsters. Does it mean J.D. Vance duped or hypnotized Trump or Trump is unaware of what Vance is doing?

Starting point is 02:42:34 Like Joe Biden, 2023, both theories seem to be far worse indictments of Trump than the fact that it's obviously Trump's decision and his deal and this should be called the Trump deal. But he's right, though. You have this weird Israel first side of it. It's like the Vance deal and a lot of this weird mainstream alternative media carve out. I mean, it's just pathetically obvious. You're just trying to pivot advance so you don't be seen to call up Trump. Why?

Starting point is 02:42:55 Because you'll be eaten alive by the don't counter signal the leader team, which will do whatever they can to destroy you because you're making Trump look bad. That's what happens. This is whatever you want to call it, audience capture, control. I mean, these people will, it's like the Kyle Rittenhouse example, where he said something that was true, but they didn't like it. So they attacked him and he pulled it back. That's what they do.

Starting point is 02:43:18 So this is just an interesting point where basically what you can see, is the Qatari minister walk up and completely snub J.D. Vance. And he even kind of starts to reach out for him and he just ignores him. And he just talks at him, see? And he just kind of looks at him, ignores him. And by the way, that's been pretty roundly acknowledged

Starting point is 02:43:44 by even people supporting Trump, that that was a pretty obvious snub. And it says, look at how they treat him. The Qatar dude totally dissed him. So dumb with these people. They will never be peace with these Islamo terrorists. You mean the group that you got, that your administration is working with,

Starting point is 02:43:59 The will, like self-delusion and all this is insane. And this guy said, this is exactly the point. There is no negotiating with Islamists. It shows kids with guns. Like, that's not, you couldn't show that in like every society ever. But here's the crazy part. Okay. No negotiating with Lamas.

Starting point is 02:44:15 Okay. Well, here I just was interested and looked. That guy, see, Steve Iry right here, this is that guy. He, on his timeline, reposted this. And what is this? People just don't get it. They don't understand what a memorandum of understanding. actually is. It says an MOU is merely an initial framework for deal negotiations. Oh, okay. So you said

Starting point is 02:44:38 there's no negotiating with this type of people and then you cheer that Trump is negotiating with those people. Got it. So you're calling out Trump then? No, we all know that's not what he's doing. He's just being a hypocrite. These are people that will go bad, bad, bad, but then what Trump does good, because Trump's good and he's a dealmaker, there are people that are dishonest. And a lot of them are genuine, they just are willing to lie to themselves about their own opinions because they want to be on a team. I don't think that's the majority though. Now, in general here, here is an example of the both the combination of the Israel-America-ferty types, the Zionism types, the Jewish supremacy element, that all of this is interconnected around the kind of Zionism infiltration,

Starting point is 02:45:23 who are right now pushing the idea that America, even though Netanyahuahuas, even though Netanyahu who came out and said, this is not our war, even though he's the one keeping it going. And I told you from the very beginning, it would be Americans that would die for Israel's war. That's what happened. And so the case is that they're saying, we need to go in ground if necessary

Starting point is 02:45:41 and take out Iran no matter what. Well, okay, does that mean Israelis? Of course not. They mean Americans. Well, I don't know how you can misunderstand that. This is not about America first. It's about the interest in Israel wants and they're willing to kill Americans to get it.

Starting point is 02:45:55 As Mel says, Zionist Jews will gladly send every American son to die for their god-persaken country and then call you a united semite if you dare to say no. Iran is not strong, but America's many powerful weapons count for absolutely nothing if it won't use them. If America won't commit itself to take the pain involved in fighting for its way of life, then Iran wins. And America won't defend itself properly because it does not understand that when it has an enemy as in the Iranian regime that believes God is instructing it to destroy America and the Jews.

Starting point is 02:46:39 I mean, guys, think about that. That's not actually what they're arguing, right? They're arguing that because your aggression towards them is why you are an evil element trying to destroy them. Israel is the one who has a prophetic vision for how they have to kill these people. I mean, I just can't get past how they must know that about themselves. when Hegeseth in an interview tries to argue that Iran has some future prophetic vision of taking over the world. Point to it.

Starting point is 02:47:05 Show me where that's being stated. It's what Israel is proudly saying, and Hegsth has a tattoo for it. They know what they're doing, guys. They're trying to pivot their own agenda onto the group they want to destroy for their agenda. I just find that insane. Any negotiation is viewed by them as weakness and a way to manipulate America into surrender. To defeat Iran, America needs to end all negotiation and fight through blockades or kinetic war or boots on the ground wherever necessary. Of course, right? Just go into one of the most objectively acknowledged catastrophic wars that has ever been.

Starting point is 02:47:45 Like going in on the ground against Iran will be an absolute bloodbath, chaotic World War III situation. But do it because Israel wants that. And that's what we demand. Just it's insane, isn't it? Max Blumenthal. Open source intel says U.S. Home on Security Secretary, Mullen. Iran tried to smuggle IRGC members into the U.S. as part of their World Cup team. Does anybody actually buy that? I mean, it's obviously possible, but with all we've seen and how many,

Starting point is 02:48:18 I mean, this guy can barely spell his own name and we're going to pretend like, this is obviously why he's there. Yell this narrative out without facts. There'll never be any evidence to back it up because I don't believe it. Prove me wrong. I'm rarely doing this. This is completely off the cuff, just my gut. And I'm only saying it to make a point, you understand,

Starting point is 02:48:37 because I'm willing to bet you anything because of what we know about this group, that what you're going to get from them is either absolutely nothing or some kind of tangential, this guy connects to this group who says they support Hesble or something like that, and they're going to make this argument. But my opinion is this is nothing other than selling you the fear narrative

Starting point is 02:48:54 that something may happen, or even worse, because they're planning to do something and they want to blame it on the phantom. say is in your country. As Max Blumenthal says, the same U.S. Homeland Security Secretary who faked his own military service record. Yeah, that's the guy. Mark Wayne Mullen. I still so wish I had gotten that segment out that I had back then. I just, too much was happening. I had this long segment about what a absolute fool this guy is. The hundred different things he said that'll make you cringe and laugh out loud.

Starting point is 02:49:23 This guy is literally in one of the most powerful positions in this government. Same point we were making earlier, guys. You just can't make. this up. This is being done to us. And now he wants you to believe that, you know, he wants you to think that there's secret Iranian cells. Look, obviously that's something we should always consider. Because it happens. China, whatever else, I think governments do this. We know our government does it. We know Israel does it. But historically speaking, and even what's in their best interest, does that make sense that they at a time when they're trying to show that they're not the one who's fighting them, that they would send a group in to do what, to hurt American

Starting point is 02:49:56 citizens who they obviously outwardly tell us is not their enemy, they want you to think that, guys, stop falling for it. Now, to finish with both Lebanon and then just generally where Israel is at today, here is the Israeli, uh, was it again, the foreign minister? Yeah, minister of defense, excuse me. Cats. Israel has, this is, uh, middle day yesterday. Israel has no intention of withdrawing from, therefore, well, from it from Lebanon, which is an

Starting point is 02:50:28 integral part of the security zone of Lebanon and essential for the defense of Galilee. Yeah, other places you're illegally occupying. Got it. As Prime Minister of Netanyahu and I have clarified, Israel will not withdraw from the security zone. What that means is land we've illegally stolen from innocent people. That they now declare has to be because if we leave that, they'll attack us. Oh, probably because you murder their families. Crazy, right?

Starting point is 02:50:53 But his point regardless of all of that is we're not leaving Lebanon, no matter what. that is a violation and Trump and now Trump is yelling at Hezbollah to stop bombing them. We'll get to understand. Hezbollah whether or not they're bombing does not change the fact that Israel is occupying Lebanon. Iran is demanding that they stop occupying Lebanon. That's it. So all Trump did was exposed that he does not have any power and is willing to embarrass himself further to yell what Israel wants him to say. Here is Ben Gavir. After everything we were seeing him say, after the post he put out, he goes on TV and says Lebanon, all of Lebanon should become our playground. That's his statement. All of Lebanon should be our target. And they tell me,

Starting point is 02:51:32 wait a second, there's Lebanon and then there's Hezbollah. Here's what he says. I do not accept this artificial approach. Neither does any of the Israeli government, just like they don't think Gaza or rather Palestinians and Haas are different. And they stated that if you listened to anybody. Same thing here. You think Netanyahu and the rest guys, you listen to them outside of what Fox News shares. That's what they'll tell you. They're the same. That's why they bomb Lebanese Bay routes, you know, downtown areas. They're full of civilians. That's the very Lebanon they tell you they're fighting for.

Starting point is 02:52:03 Just like they told you they're fighting for Gaza. Have you looked at Gaza lately? Have you looked at the parking lot they've turned it into like they told you they would? How's that fighting for Gaza? The Palestinians that are being bombed in their tents today. Then he adds, let a thousand Lebanese mothers weep and not one Israeli mother weep. Saeed Muhammad Morandi says,

Starting point is 02:52:24 this is mainstream Zionism thought, mainstream Zionism thought without a filter. Sarah Abdullah points out Israel killed Daniela today in Conorrent, South Lebanon, not a fighter, just a young Christian woman. But she won't hear any

Starting point is 02:52:40 fake Christian patriots out there caring about that. You could go down a list of the people who would not care about that. They pretend to be fighting for a Christian America First Agenda. Mencho Sint points out what this fake, I mean, this guy was getting called out by other people in the MAGA movement recently for being dishonest Israel firster.

Starting point is 02:53:02 I'm trying to show you this, guys, it's being seen. They're not really America first. And he's been pretending to be. He says the most dishonest post of the day, Israel's attacking Christians in Lebanon, as they do frequently, by the way. Christians are in southern Lebanon because the Islamic Republic ethically cleanse them. This is the same argument they made in Gaza when that ridiculous person from Israeli government came on and said, there's no churches. And the guy goes, I just talk to the pastor.

Starting point is 02:53:27 Well, they don't believe. There's no Christians. Well, I just talked to their person. They're, you know, and she goes, well, I don't know. Iran or Hamas, bad guy. She got caught lying. And then it continued to bomb the churches that are still in Gaza. They know what they're doing.

Starting point is 02:53:40 This guy knows what he's doing. He says the use of Christianity to lie on behalf of Iran. Well, the reality is you can literally watch the idea of sledge hammering a Christ on the cross or beating, I mean, guys, spitting on Christians or whatever else we've talked about. over the years. This is what they posted. And he wants you to believe that they're pretending that. Is that a fake Christian church inside of a fake Lebanese town? Guys, this is a very, there's a huge Christian population, just like there was in Syria before they destroyed it. Like there wasn't

Starting point is 02:54:11 gods before they kicked them out. It's what they do. And they want to turn around and blame the group that they want to pretend every Muslim hates them. Well, they're the ones creating the circumstance. Well, yeah, some of them definitely do now. Despite continuous and blatant fake news lies. Iran's military complex has been destroyed. That's what Trump says now. This is just the dumbest thing I've ever had to report on. We just told you what's going on. Guys, you can easily check this for yourself right now. Right now. The street that's closed right now with what? No Navy? Explain that for me, Donald Trump. Here's what he just said. Navy is gone. Their Air Force is God. Their leaders are all dead. Their leaders are all dead. Okay. How does that make sense? You mean,

Starting point is 02:54:55 the ones you were just talking to? Their whole country's a mess. Their economy is shot. The percent bragged about doing that, by the way. Oh, the Times, the fake New York Times said, oh, it's about the same as it was four months ago. No, four months ago, they had a Navy, 159 ships, to be exact.

Starting point is 02:55:15 What was that now? Is it 59 now? I guess he's up that again. The number changes every time brings it up. The whole Navy's gone. There are 250 airplanes, all gone. their anti-aircraft is gone. Their radar is gone.

Starting point is 02:55:29 These guys love radar. Their radar is gone. Oh, yeah. You like radar. Radar. Yeah, radar's cool. This is just pathetic. I mean, okay, then take it.

Starting point is 02:55:40 I mean, what are you doing? Are you, you're waiting for more people to be killed? I mean, you want the, what's the job? What's the possible logic for not taking it? I mean, if you're saying they have nothing to defend it, then just take it. I mean, and this is what he says. I mean, guys, nobody believes it. I don't even need to pretend like that makes sense.

Starting point is 02:55:59 It's just sad. Everything's gone. Their leaders are gone. Their whole country is gone. I thought he said there was a regime change, though, even though there wasn't, though. It was the son that went into place right afterward. And then he said, well, we bombed the third one. Not after the third one, there was a new regime.

Starting point is 02:56:14 So it was a regime change. Didn't you say that like a month ago? Apparently they're all dead, though, because whatever. And the time said, oh, they're about the same as they were for. months ago. I just, it's just, I guess, don't even know how to frame this. I just, I mean, I think at some point we're going to hopefully be able to look back and there'll be some anomaly that makes, whether it's just literally Israel puppeteering Trump,

Starting point is 02:56:35 I just, this is just astounding. Stounding. Of course, Rubio without travel to the UAE, Kuwait and Bahrain from Tuesday amid negotiations with Iran and the war. Oh, so you're going to travel around the Middle East because Iran's not dealing with you and you're going to frame that as negotiations are continuing? Yes, because they're desperate. Well, to finish, in case you didn't know, on top of everything else going on, well, that war that says he solved that he puts in that list, he keeps telling you, well, five killed a Ukrainian missile

Starting point is 02:57:08 attack on Russian city. Because that's still happening, right? The Azov Nazis that the U.S. and Israel are openly funding still to this very day. Yeah, that's still happening. We should get into the same narrative all again to understand the reality of the started. Regardless what you think about it, guys, the point is not even. about that now for this segment today. It's simply understanding that they have continued to embellish and fund and push and benefit and manipulate every one of the things they're claiming, you know, go down the list of everything Trump said he was going to do.

Starting point is 02:57:37 All the wars he was going to stop. All the not new wars he was going to continue. All the funding he was going to stop. All the governments he was going to shrink. You have to laugh. And how silly this all is. One of them being the end of the Ukraine war. And then he went on to fund it the same way.

Starting point is 02:57:50 Or Somalia. U.S. announces a series of airstrikes in Somalia. As Dave DeKamp writes, the war that you don't even know is happening is still happening. Oh, there was also another ship they murdered, apparently. The Pentagon just sank a boat and killed two people in the Caribbean. No trial, no charges, just a strike on a narco terrorist that they quote, narco terrorist, they claim.

Starting point is 02:58:11 They just reported that there were potentially human trafficking survivors in one of these boats or the idea that we're talking about people that were famous fishermen that weren't even trafficking drugs. It doesn't matter what you think is happening. There's no world in which the U.S. government has legal authorities just unilaterally murder somebody in the middle of international waters with no anything. It's obvious. All of what they're doing is obvious. Here are people in the West Bank.

Starting point is 02:58:40 Israeli settlers boast about stealing land for Palestinians. Quote, we take house by house, neighborhood by neighborhood, until everything is Jewish. As Giorge Galloway says, doesn't leave much to room for doubt. does it. Abir points out they're removing the footage, but it's already been archived. Demons. Israel is using bombs that appear to be toys in both Gaza and Lebanon. How many times can we possibly report that? Cans that look like cartoons, things look like toys that blow up in children's hands, or drones that put out children crying sounds so people come to help them and they bomb them. That's what villains do, guys. These are the bad guys that sell them.

Starting point is 02:59:24 Dehumanization of Palestinians has become completely normal in Israeli public and political discourse. This is the director of Betzel, the Israeli human rights group, telling you that people in Israel predominantly dehumanized Palestinians. We know that. Here's a real picture. No, that's not a zombie movie or a horror movie. No, that's real, guys. That's a Palestinian that was let go from Israel.

Starting point is 02:59:49 Palestinian lawyer Khalid Mahatian, what is it, Mahajan, recounting. at a brief conversation he had with Palestinian prisoner during a court hearing after noticing clear signs of exhaustion and fatigue on him. In an ex post, he wrote, today while listening to the testimony of Palestinian prisoner in court, I asked him whether he had eaten breakfast. He replied, my last meal was yesterday afternoon.

Starting point is 03:00:09 Are you hungry? Yes. The hearing was halted, and the prison guards were forced to bring him food. That single yes summarizes the harsh reality that Palestinian prisoners are enduring inside their Israeli cells. Palestinian doctor, Abu Safaya, the director of the Kamal-Odwin Hospital has been held in Israel for more than 500 days.

Starting point is 03:00:30 No formal charges have been filed against him and no trials have been held. Anybody confused? It's not that we're not in the midst of something right now. They just kidnapped him. Yeah, because that's what they do. That's called a hostage, as she writes. A doctor abducted from a hospital tortured and held without charge for 500 days. It's called a hostage.

Starting point is 03:00:50 There's no confusing what's happening here, guys. If he was a terrorist, then charge him for such, even though they do that when there's no evidence anyway, but they're not even doing that. They just want to punish this guy because he's helping people they want to kill. Today is 998, or excuse me, day 989 of Israel's genocide of the Palestinians. 989 days. And they're as of right now still bombing in Gaza, still bombing in Lebanon, ethnically cleansing in Syria, all over the world.

Starting point is 03:01:22 And the reality is they kill children every single day. every day, according to the stats, according to their information. So I want to end with this clip. But I want to show you something I think is important to think about. Also speaks to the Zionism, kind of Judaism, overlap manipulation. But so this person posts this and says, he's a kid who just lost his father. He blames the Jews because that's what he was taught and sees. It's the adult's fault.

Starting point is 03:01:54 same because of what he says here in the translation oh well just showed up here says i will kill all the jews now there's two points to be made before i even read what she says first is that in the translation because of the way israel has controlled the conversation within gaza there's only one word in that's the word that's been used because israel calls zionism it is the same thing right zionism is judism it's not but that's my point every day they argue that and then so for you for any of them to go kill his family and for you to go then I'm going to kill those guys and there's only the one word you're given for what that means that then becomes confusing for people. Now secondarily, let's just even say he meant the Jews and not Zionism.

Starting point is 03:02:39 As Mel writes, that's what happens when the Jewish state, which they call themselves, it's not, which claims to be the homeland of the Jewish people that they say commits a genocide, which they're doing, under a flag stamped with what they claim as a Jewish star. Starved David, it's a Zionism symbol. It's not the sign. The menorah is a sign of the Judaism symbol, but regardless, the victim blames the Jews because Israel taught him that. Now, I made that first point for a reason,

Starting point is 03:03:07 because there is an obvious conflation that happens with translation where what they're saying is, you know, when in me cases when you translate it, they're talking about Zionism and don't make that clear. But the point overall is that how you're telling them that that's what this is and then go on to kill his family in front of him with that symbol. and he's not supposed to turn around.

Starting point is 03:03:26 That's what you're reframing it as. But this is why I think it's so important to highlight the distinction and how it's being used and why, I mean, a wildly growing number of people in the world Jewish or otherwise are starting to call out the discrepancy between Judaism and Zionism. But I think that's super important, guys, because this is how the game is played, and they're driving people into that position. And it will be your failure. If you allow them to get you in the two-party illusion or this,

Starting point is 03:03:55 caveat to pretend like that's all or nothing. It's just never the case. Regardless, they kill children every day, and that has to matter. So I'll leave you with this clip. Thank you for tuning in today. I love you all. As always, question everything. Come to your own conclusions. Stay vigilant. Many, many months, the world has been told there is a ceasefire in Gaza. Yet for Palestinian children, and this so-called ceasefire has become a cruel and a deadly illusion. Since the ceasefire was announced in October last year, 265 Palestinian children have been killed across Gaza. So during a period supposedly defined by restraint and protection,

Starting point is 03:04:41 a child is killed on average every single day for more than eight months. These children were not killed in a war zone. They were killed in their homes. They were killed in their schools. They were killed playing football. They were shot. They were bombed. They were struck by quadcopters.

Starting point is 03:04:58 This week, a two-year-old boy was shot and killed by Israeli forces. A 13-year-old boy was shot and killed in his tent. A five-year-old boy and his father were killed by an Israeli strike. And on and on it goes. We must stop accepting levels of child deaths that would provoke international outrage anywhere else. We must stop normalising the abnormal. The killing of children, it's not the consequence of a lack of options. It is the consequence of a lack of political will.

Starting point is 03:05:30 Every day that passes without responsibility sends the same message. Palestinian children's lives can be taken without accountability. This is no longer a failure of the system. It has become the system.

The Last American Vagabond - The Israel Shaped Quantum Back Door & Trump's Iran Deal Predictably Spins Out

There aren't comments yet for this episode. Click on any sentence in the transcript to leave a comment.