The Last American Vagabond - Trump Rejects Peace (Again), Alleged "Terror Plot" On US Base In UK & MSM Admits Oct 7 Foreknowledge

Starting point is 00:00:01 It starts with a simple question and ends an objective reality. Through our journey from there to hear, we find one another and ourselves. And as the next 24 hours breaks free from our last, we gaze onward in reflection of the day. Help your own includes. Welcome to the Daily Wrapup. Sunday, September 27, 26. Thank you for joining me today. I want to get into some interesting recent events in regard to a possible false flag.

Starting point is 00:00:49 That's what my feeling is about it, at least something suspicious about what just happened in the UK around a U.S. base that's being sort of thrown towards Iran. But get caught up around some of the other events happening in regard to the Iran war and some important aspects of that, some bigger parts around the energy discussion. A lot of research I did today that I'm going to hopefully get to tomorrow is interestingly kind of wrapped back into this larger network state agenda, specifically through Honduras, but really kind of mapping further out this global transition that I believe is very clearly happening that the evidence I think clearly suggests. And to go through a recent argument about another caravan from Honduras and El Salvador being labeled connected to certain groups that I want to tell you now,

Starting point is 00:01:34 my research shows that it is not. It's a mistake between the two names. They're conflating a wrong name. And maybe just even with good intentions. We'll get to that hopefully tomorrow, but just know that there's another caravan conversation coming up around the immigration part of it. And it's being thrown at, you know, the typical conversation.

Starting point is 00:01:50 But I want to get into that and the deeper part of it. But I'm saying that today because it connects to what we're getting into. And one of the parts that stands out to me, which I'm going to go over in regard to the UN and Netanyahu and different statements, is the threats that were made, the arguments that are made within this, and the interesting point of people leaving the UN and having the Israeli government literally notate who wasn't there. And in case you're unfamiliar, this is not a secret. This is not something Israel even shies away from pointing out.

Starting point is 00:02:20 They will openly discuss repercussions, things they'll do politically in the world to make those people to penalize them for not being in the room when they spoke. And I just think all this is interesting in relation to numerous events that we're seeing. And also just to kind of paint that picture about what we've seen in the past. Now, I'm going to start really quickly with a couple of clips that I want you to see to set this tone for the conversation. And then we're going to talk about the UK discussion. We're going to talk about the deal that was ignored from Donald Trump. I'm going to talk about the Yemen involvement, the kind of, again, you know very well about the conversation of Yemen and the Bobham End of Strait and the,

Starting point is 00:02:58 and the ongoing blockade and starvation. But again, it's interesting how suddenly it's a new story, even within the corporate media, who has talked about it before, which just shows you that they have a way they're supposed to frame things, whether they're like conscious of that or not, which is how they frame it, whether or not they've already done exposés

Starting point is 00:03:16 about things they pretend they don't know in the new coverage today of Yemen and the Bible and end of straight. We'll talk about Pentagon quietly adding dozens of more troops to the casualty list that no one's talking about. and some updates around October 7th and what you know, Netanyahu said publicly and the floundering support for Israel in the world and why this relates to a lot of different things. But not that you need to know about the foreknowledge of October 7th or the ongoing genocide. But one point we'll make, again, is to just make sure you do see that. But about how, you know, why now? Why is it all of a

Starting point is 00:03:50 sudden acceptable for people to go on Hannity and talk about how we know? You know, it's a controlled release. They must know that because it's not like they just discovered it because the post said there's been plenty of corporate media reports talking about this up until now. It's just, you know, I could give you, it'd be my opinion about how this all works, but I don't think we can even debate this kind of thing. You know, the idea that there is an obvious wall between the flow of information and, you know, you could even just make it political and financial interests. I tend to think it's that and a lot more, but worth seeing that if you have not. So, first, a clip that you might have seen going around.

Starting point is 00:04:29 And it's important to see, almost, you know, prescient. Israel no longer belongs within the civilized community of nations. And its barbarism demands nothing less than decisive action to safeguard not just the Middle East, but the entire global order. This cumulative acts of violence against an entire nation leaves us with no choice, but to demand the swift and effective action of the international community, including embargo, suspension, and even expulsion. If the world turns away now, this violence will not remain contained.

Starting point is 00:05:10 It will ignite a fire that threatens to engulf the entire region and the rest of the world. That's the Malaysian Prime Minister. Now, he has not shied away from talking about Israel more than once. Now, what you might know, because we've actually played this before, is you might recognize that clip from being not about right this moment. But in fact, from actually closer to two, it was, I think, the end of, it lists as a year only because of the way they do this, but it's almost two years old, as far as I can tell.

Starting point is 00:05:41 And this is interesting because what he's saying is, you know, look, if we don't do something about what Israel is, what they're doing, and again, not that we have to go through everything, you understand, we're talking about the Israeli government. whatever you think that connects to, whatever you want to argue, that means it's about the government and their actions, period. There's no nuance there. We're talking about what Israel's government is doing in the world. Now, there are plenty of deeper conversations, as you will know, but just understand that he's pointing out that what the Israeli government is doing in the world, what they're, and let's add another point. You could even say there's other groups around them that are far worse and driving them.

Starting point is 00:06:17 Okay, that's not the point. You're wrong in the larger reality of what's driving all of them. the point, though, is that in regard to what he's saying is saying, look at what they're creating. If we don't do something as the community that we pretend we are, this is only going to lead to what we're watching right now is what he was pointing to. Or at least that it's going to get worse. It's going to cause more fallout. There's going to be more division. It's going to cause other countries that may want to line up with them. You're going to end up dealing with exactly what we're watching.

Starting point is 00:06:48 And nobody cared. At least nobody within the means to make something. actually happened to actually, you know, call out and expose what they're doing on the grand stage. Now, here's another clip. You recognize this one as well. Philip Duraldi, 2014. Here's what he had to say. You've all heard the expression that a friend does not let a friend drive drunk. Well, the United States has been driving drunk for quite some time, and that dangerous behavior has to some extent been encouraged by Israel and as many supporters in Washington. I also would not doubt that Israel, accustomed to behaving with impunity towards its alleged friend

Starting point is 00:07:28 and patron in Washington, might manufacture a pretext to draw the U.S. into a new conflict. If the United States goes to war with Iran in the near future, it will not be because Tehran actually threatens America. It will be because Israel and his powerful lobby in the U.S. have succeeded in creating an essentially false casus belly to manpower. date such action. Yeah, that's pretty simple, pretty clear. 2014, right? Somebody from the intelligence community. Not a unique opinion. Now, this is the craziest part about this. This is not secret. It's not new. It's not even unique. And yet, here we are. And all of the ridiculous, you know, stuffy, high-minded journalists out there who

Starting point is 00:08:13 aren't actually journalists who are out there screaming false information out, you are acting like we're debating about the validity of the world. It's frustrating because we know that. is there. And we know, and look, you could also go, maybe he's wrong. Maybe, of course you should, but he's not. The evidence has always been there. And you can see the evidence from day one of this war with Rubio blatantly telling you that this is. And yet we still debate this. And we still battle against the propagandists out there that pretend to be informers and the new media that pretend to be on your side. It's just always been there. And now, and again, it's not even about him saying this. It's him saying this after we already have the evidence that demonstrates that we

Starting point is 00:08:51 know that Trump was either trick. or willingly went along with something that was not just counter to U.S. interests, but counter to global interests, counter to American desires and voted, you know, what they wanted from Trump and what he promised them. Now, not, you know, not like the specific base that he told, you know, you know all this. He continues. While it is often observed that everyone spies on everyone else, particularly true if one is referring to our own NSA, espionage is a high-risk business that most countries are

Starting point is 00:09:21 extremely careful when they are spying on friends because of fear of blowback. Israel, which relies on Washington for billions of dollars in aid and also for political cover and international fora like the UN, does not spy discreetly, largely because it knows that few in Washington will seek to hold it to account. It's the same point. So is he anti-Semitic for pointing out an obvious data point that the intelligence community is well aware of? I mean, you could argue yes, in addition to that.

Starting point is 00:09:51 Who knows? I don't know his mind or his intent. The point is that statement is not any semantic. It's just a fact. Israel, where government and business work hand in hand, has obtained significant advantage by systematically stealing American technology with both military and civilian applications. The U.S. developed technology is then reversed engineered and used by the Israelis to support their own exports. The GAO concluded that Israel conducts, and this is a quote, conducts the most aggrieved. aggressive espionage operation against the United States of any U.S. ally. So the answer to the question is, and guys, just to be clear, if you understand the reality in general, worse than the enemies, and that's what people will tell you, you listen to

Starting point is 00:10:36 Wilkerson, listen to everybody else that tells you that, and he knows, he knows, he said as much. Israel and ally of the United States is most definitely no. Right. Is Israel an ally? The question, is Israel an ally of the United States is most definitely no? Or at the very least, if there are no allies for something like the Israeli government, right? The old statement that who needs enemies when you get friends like Israel?

Starting point is 00:11:02 Is it even a friend? Well, I suppose there are all kinds of friends in the world. But if you judge... Now, it goes on from there. But here's another clip. Add to this, I don't know if you've seen it. It might be new to some of you, but it's an important one. They buy it from, or I think they were buying it from.

Starting point is 00:11:18 We have an incredible array of possibilities of creating foreign companies that have no way being traced back to Israel, shell companies over shell companies who affect the supply chain to our favor. We create a pretend world. We are a global production company. We write the screenplay. We're the directors. We're the producers. We're the main actors. The world is our stage.

Starting point is 00:11:45 Did you see any surprises in Gaza? Surprises. Like the intelligence surprises. Pages, walkie to talkers. Do you know how many equipment, I mean, treated equipment do we have in these countries? You can't, you're not. I do. You mean, I do?

Starting point is 00:11:57 You mean booby-trapped equipment? Not only booby-trapped and spying. Manipulated equipment. All right. In which countries you're talking about? All the countries that you can imagine. Yeah, I'm going to continue to play that as many times I possibly can where it's relevant because it's insane to me that that's something that's not, you know,

Starting point is 00:12:13 I mean, Candace Owens can play it regularly on a show. And it still, it somehow doesn't break through to to certain conversations. Now, again, some of them don't want to see it and don't care, but I'm not talking about that. You think about just those clips together, the reality of that, you know, and with countless other elements, I mean, in this very thing, I believe there's a clip of Joe Kent, who I have my own, you know, mixed feelings about in general. I think we should for clear, you know, anyway, the point, though, is that he's in there talking to going underground, telling literally that Trump was fooled into doing this. Now, even that, though, I don't know

Starting point is 00:12:44 if we know that. I would argue that's one of the possibilities, but it's just as possible that Trump just knowingly went along with this or that he's blackmailed because of the Epstein files. So that's why I don't like this kind of, you know, Kent is making arguments that seem very easy to make at this point, but seem contentious if you don't know this background, right? But if you understand where we actually are, it feels like it's not accurate. It makes me wonder whether they're trying to, you know, usually how these things go. And I'm not saying I have any real reason other than skepticism and some statements that were made to doubt him. But overall, just historically, this is how it goes.

Starting point is 00:13:14 where once these things become aware of, you know, people become aware of them. Americans broadly start seeing things like the Epstein files. And you can't just continue to ignore it. I mean, Trump sure tried and that didn't work. But it evolves. The new and you try to couch older comments and new, you know, like this, where ultimately it becomes instead, like let's just say now we find out

Starting point is 00:13:34 that Trump was a willing participant in all of this. And the narrative then becomes that he was fooled. Well, that's in his interest to argue that. Because now he got, I was tricked. It wasn't my fault. Now, who does it say? I'm sure hopefully we'll find out more as we go forward in time, but just think about that. Now, again, the point was all these together. It's obvious that there's infiltration to a degree that it should be mind-blowing. This should be changing the

Starting point is 00:13:56 conversation that should have changed years ago. Keeping all that in mind. Let's talk about what just happened in the UK. Five men arrested near the UK air base used in the U.S. by U.S. in Iran war on suspicion of preparing a terrorist attack. There's like six different things in this story that stand out is strange. Now, I want to state right out of the gate, it could be something other than what I might lean towards. For example, I often have this thought that I think, you know, we know these platforms will lie, will manipulate,

Starting point is 00:14:27 and sometimes we'll tell themselves it's for some larger goods. Sometimes they don't realize it's happening. Still accountable. But my point is that knowing that we have examples of deliberate misrepresentation and lies, sometimes I think you get these platforms that perceive us as what they're, you know, were the crazy conspiracy theories that will misrepresent facts to sell our, which is what they do every single day. And yes, but there are plenty of people in this community that do that, unfortunately. The point, though, is that then you get this response almost byproduct, if you

Starting point is 00:14:56 will, where that very media apparatus then sort of like holds things close to the chest because they think will misrepresent it. And it doesn't necessarily represent what we might think it is. If that makes sense to you. But all that shouldn't even matter because we don't know what their intent is. so we should just care whether we're being withheld or misrepresented, right? But I'm only saying that insofar is that, like, I wonder what it is that drives these kind of statements. The lack of information, kind of opaque coverage that go,

Starting point is 00:15:22 why wouldn't you, you know, you'll see it as we go through this. But also that the idea that, you know, maybe there is something more to this. And there's an agenda about keeping a certain flow of the conversation. But the last part is just simply that, you know, we know that there are things that happen that are orchestrated. We also know that sometimes, especially in Trump's era, that he just lies about things to gain some kind of momentum, like I think happens here in some degree. Well, we'll go through it and you'll see what I mean about whether he's lying or it's something that's supposed to be discussed.

Starting point is 00:15:54 But ultimately Trump pretends to know something about this when my gut says he doesn't. Now, this is from today. UK police said Sunday that five men arrested in the middle of the night near the air base used by the United States during the war against Iran are being. held on suspicion of preparing a terrorist attack that appeared to involve three trucks. So right there, language is very clear. We don't know. We think they might have been preparing something. Okay.

Starting point is 00:16:23 Well, if you, if right now under arrest, it's suspicion of preparing, I think deductive logic would suggest they don't have a bomb, right? But we'll get into the Daily Mail reporting that a policeman told them that there was a bomb, even though every other platform seems to suggest that we don't know. I find that interesting. Daily Mail is not the best one to be trusting in that situation. Anybody shouldn't be trusted, but questioning, you know, but they have a bad track record. But so just in that simple opening part, it just seems like you're talking about, you know, somebody that was suspiciously doing something, but you don't really know.

Starting point is 00:16:57 And already, right in those kind of moments, like, oh, that feels like, why is this being blown in proportion if all you did was catch three guys who you, you know, have weird backgrounds that might have been doing something, but you can't be sure. it's because it's been reported around right now. Now also, note that this is a base in the UK that's being used by the United States to conduct an illegal war. That's been literally conducting war crimes, bombing schools and hospitals and girls, you know, that matters. Doesn't mean it's then legal to go out and do something as a civilian to anything, but it matters in what might drive somebody to do that, including something from a foreign country. So here's a question, hypothetically, if this was an operation by Iran, which I don't believe it was.

Starting point is 00:17:36 but if it was an operation by Iran to take out a U.S. base, would that be a crime? Would it be a terrorist attack? Or would it literally be a military operation to take out a military target? That doesn't, doesn't that seem to matter? So continuing, London's Metropolitan Police. And I want to be clear, by the way, advocating for any attack on anybody, because people always try to take things out of context. London's Metropolitan Police, which takes the lead on a potential terrorist activities,

Starting point is 00:18:02 said police received a call at 1245 a.m. So early this morning, related to the three suspicious vehicles that appear to be traveling towards the base or fort, I guess, is how Trump referred to it, which I still find sort of remedial. But I know we do call them that, but it's just funny. Fort is not usually what year. The UK-owned base that is operated by the U.S. under agreement back dating back to the Cold War. Now, the middle of the night call comes from a random person who just thought she saw something suspicious. So remember that because it becomes very difficult to pretend this was some kind of an operation, which Trump wants you to believe, when it all started because of a random person going, I don't know,

Starting point is 00:18:40 this looks weird. Now, Fairford, Fairford has been used by American bombers for strikes against Iran under the agreement with Keir Starmer, who originally pushed back, but then said, okay, only defensive, which is the stupidest. You're bombing things. It's not defensive, okay? And they're not just bombing, even if they're bombing missile sites, they're still an offensive. of attack, regardless of how they play this Orwellian game, but that's not only what they're doing. That's how he pretends he can rationalize this with his populace who also don't want this for

Starting point is 00:19:10 to happen, is that he's just only defending him. Nobody believes that. Either way, the point is it's something he pushed back on, but then allowed. Occasionally that matters to you in a larger sense from the UK. Iran has previously indicated that a base used to attack its territory is a legitimate target. Think about a statement like that from the AP. The Associated Press, like one of the one of the main, you know, one of the main, you know,

Starting point is 00:19:31 top of the pyramid of the propaganda multiplier, right above them would be the State Department and so on which just dumps down information, AP, French Press Agency and others who just are like considered Fox News and CNN or, you know, Washington Post. They're the ones that drip these things out. Now, largely that's where most those platforms, if you don't know this already, get this kind of information. There's no real investigative journalism. It takes place in most of the media today. It's places like this that still do it, they say. The point, though, is that this is supposed to be like the high level of Merton journalism today. Iran has previously indicated that a military base that no one's debating is being used for operations

Starting point is 00:20:08 against Iran is. Yeah, it is, though, AP. There's not a debate indicated. It literally is. De facto, period. We all know that. But the way that they write that is suggest that, well, Iran claims it's a base. It just seems disgusting and like blatant propaganda. Am I wrong? I mean, you know, someone like I saw Rod's been out there breaking this stuff down for since October 7th, probably before that, but I started seeing her do that. And it's just, it's embarrassing. Every day, she will break down deliberate word choices that you cannot ignore. Identical events that happen and one's attack, one's a, you know, a serious, you know,

Starting point is 00:20:46 a violent series, you know, whatever they use. It's just a deliberate way to frame one as terrorism, one as defense. You know, it's what they do. So yes, guys, in case you're confused, that base is a legitimate target. There's no question about that. authorities are investigating a link between the Fairfruit arrests and Iran as one possibility. So to be clear, no one has any indication Iran's connected to this. That's coming from people like Trump and people that want that connection.

Starting point is 00:21:10 But at the point at the moment, I'm not convinced this is even what they say it is, let alone Iran's connected to it. The five men were initially arrested on suspicion of committing offense under the Explosives Act. So again, so you're so random call in the middle of the night and you guys go out there and arrest the guys and you don't. go, well, we think they had a bomb. You go, where we think they were committing offenses under the Explosives Act? What does that even mean? There's no way you would have an insight into that, like so you've investigated the information. The article starts by a suspicion, but now you're

Starting point is 00:21:42 telling them, somehow you have a suspicion that they're committing offenses under the Explosives Act. I don't buy this. There's either more to the story where maybe Trump then is right that they had some ongoing thing they're covering up, or this is a fake story. I mean, explain to me. I'm not even all the way through this. This is just my feeling. But think about how in the world you're going to say that you, how would you know they're committing an offense under the Explosives Act? What is that? So if it's just a bomb, is that under the Explosives Act?

Starting point is 00:22:08 Maybe. My point would be, why wouldn't you just say, we think they had a bomb? And if you think they had a bomb, you don't know they had a bomb. And so therefore you wouldn't even go to violation of the Explosives Act. It just seems weird. It stands out to me. Aerial footage from Sky News appeared to show a bomb disposal robot roaming between three white trucks.

Starting point is 00:22:24 The rear doors of the white vans were open and large black items could be seen scattered around. So at that point right there, you're telling me that we don't know, or it's either being withheld, which there's plenty of reasons it might be, but it's still weird. And there was evacuations too. Or it ultimately amounted to nothing. We don't know. And so now you're just running with suspicion, which kind of feels like what this is. It might have been blown in proportion and then just used to claim, as they do in this article,

Starting point is 00:22:50 this is why we're under so much threat. You know, we mean the idea that this might have happened is why we should be, that's what they're doing already. police gave no details as to the nationality of those arrested, which seems interesting, as usually they're very quick to point that out, which usually suggests to me that it's not what you might think, right? That it's, you know, three Israeli guys or, you know, whatever, something that they don't want you to know,

Starting point is 00:23:12 whereas if this was three Muslim guys, I would be willing to bet you anything, it would be pointed out. Even though you get the left, right game, whether you pretend one side kind of wants to do one doesn't. At the end of the day, that's not real, in my opinion. I think the agenda for the government is to use to create the other, The division. Suspects arrested under the Terrorism Act,

Starting point is 00:23:30 2000 can be detained, get this, for up to 14 days without charge. Freedom compared to the 14, 24-hour limit for standard arrests. The idea that you can be arrested without any charge in any context for any period of time is insane and not an indication of a free country. You know, the idea, we're just going to investigate you for 14 days

Starting point is 00:23:48 because we claim it was amounts to terrorism. Oh, we were wrong. Go home. Two weeks later. Quote, we are in the early stages of an investigation and five men remain in custody. Okay. If they had a bomb, we would know about it. Anybody disagree with that? So we don't know.

Starting point is 00:24:04 Or they have one. They don't want you to know that for some reason. That's where I'm at right now. Evan said a 400 meter yard cordon has been like a, you know, a barrier or a kind of protective, you know, police line, whatever it is, a cordon have been put in place around the three vehicles that raise suspicion while the Army conducts examinations. So Evan said,

Starting point is 00:24:25 that a 400 meter cordon had been put her in place around the three vehicles that raised suspicion while the army conducts examinations. I don't know what that means. The cordon raised suspicion, right? They've been placed around the three vehicles or that the vehicles raise suspicion, which would suggest that the vehicles are not necessarily known to be bombs at this point. As a precaution, around 85 households have been evacuated. Some have been taken to nearby recreation center. Yeah, you know, you might argue that would happen even just with the fear, but didn't happen with these Palestine and plenty of others that were living through actual problems. Well, now, you know, we're UK, US here, but quote, it was an amazing job.

Starting point is 00:25:02 We had them under investigation, Trump says. They were looking to do big damage to our fort. Sounds like a sixth grader. And working with the British worked out great. He told reporters, we had them under view for a long time and we got him. So, you know, like Cash Patel would lie about anything to make you sell, to make him look like he's doing well. far as I can tell, that's a bunch of nonsense. But that's really embarrassing, but typical for Trump right now.

Starting point is 00:25:30 We urge people not to speculate while the authorities establish the full facts. Now, you could argue that that's them trying to hold back on releasing things that Trump then blatant just, you know, just vomits out into the world stage and they're irritated about that or ongoing investigation. He just yells out all the facts. That's possible, too. I don't think that's what's happening. But that would be equally, maybe not equally, but it would be pretty stupid for Trump to do that,

Starting point is 00:25:51 just so he could look like he's in charge. but it says British security officials say proxies linked to Iran have been behind a string of arson and sabotage attempts in the UK and other countries, many of them targeting Jewish communities. Why does that even make sense to anybody? Why does anybody even think in any sense that Iranians are just like, we hate the Jews? It's not true. And you could go back to a historical point

Starting point is 00:26:12 and argue very clearly why they have an anti-Israel agenda because of what Israel's done to them for a very, very, very long time, including, you know, recently murdering their equivalent of the Pope, But yes, let's question why they would have angst against Israel. But this idea that are just out there as the Iranians in general, which is how they always frame this, just seeking to hurt Jews. It's the same stupid way they frame people like us, which there can always be an overlap. There's extremism in every category. People that want to hurt Jews, hurt Christians, yeah, they exist.

Starting point is 00:26:43 But the idea that because you are Iranian or support the Iranian government or call out the U.S. government or, you know, are a conspiracy theorist that you just hate the Jews, it's insane, guys. and it's been driving so much of this. So the point is this connected back to some, you know, proxies linked to Iran. What are we even talking about? Random things that have happened in the UK that aren't in any way connected to Iran. Now, of course, it's possible that Iran's been conducting these things. Sure.

Starting point is 00:27:08 What you want to prove that to me, then I'll happily report that. I just don't see that being in their interest. What's in their interest is to do things that people see right now and to claim it. Now, I've no doubt that Iran would do and has done and might already be doing surreptitious operations to carry out things that they may not want people to see. Maybe that are crimes. Maybe that are, you know, that's what governments do. My point, though, is that we don't see that.

Starting point is 00:27:32 We don't have evidence of it. And so this ends up being something they just scoop into being Iran, then labeling that, then, you know, lobbing that back to this whole story by saying, well, there, because of that, therefore we think this might be wrong, which is kind of where this is going. And we already know how this works. They're going to insinuate Iran either way and use that momentum to continue to try to change the story. Now it says the local, was it, Gloucestershire police force, said the situation appeared to be contained.

Starting point is 00:27:58 Julian Tudsbury, who has lived in Wellford for 30 years, said a resident had reported three suspicious fans early Sunday. They said you need to evacuate. There's been a major incident. Said he couldn't elaborate. Seems odd. A major incident? What's that? So we're going to, it gets more interesting in the Daily Mail article, but a major

Starting point is 00:28:21 incident is not what ultimately happened. It's a suspicion of something and the van's got investigated and as far as I can tell, that's where this resolved. Suspicion of a possible what, as the article literally starts. It's held on suspicion. So they've arrested them and now they're being held. The event has ended and they're under suspicion of preparing an attack. But a major event, see, things like that that make you go, okay, maybe there is something that happened and they're trying to cover something up. Who knows, guys? We know, we can be honest and open about these things. We always should be, not just trying to couch it into the one thing that makes sense for what we see the world as new media mainstream most people in this field recognize

Starting point is 00:28:55 that it's important to do that to be open to where they go regardless follow the facts now here's the daily mail highlighted here the heroic resident it's understood to have phoned the airbase to no avail before she dialed 999 meaning calling the actual airbase A military base over and over and over, and nobody answered. That's, I just, that's one note alone. You know, you could, maybe the person slept, right? But keep note of these things. That seems strange, too, with everything else together.

Starting point is 00:29:36 And it says at 12.45 a.m. to report men acting suspiciously around three white bands. Now, I'm not sure what that means. I would imagine we could see something where anybody might think something looks suspicious, middle of the night. But still, you know, it's, it just, you know, what, what is in, I wonder. what drives somebody to report something like that. People in a street with cars. You know what I mean? Like I get it. Like it's because she's on guard because as you'll hear in this, they're already have terrorist attacks. They're already on terrorist lockdown in this location, which seems a bit odd. Or maybe you think it lines up.

Starting point is 00:30:11 So either way, what drive you to go, that's weird. Go look at that. What if they're three military guys bringing to supplies? You know, it's just what, you know, again, I don't like the idea like you some people out there may argue. that that's, you know, you see something, say something. And then just in case you want, you may stop an event. But again, that's putting the, you know, you're leaning into the kind of people out there, the authority systems that we're talking about that don't aren't, in my experience, on your side. Those good people in any situation. I just wonder why somebody would go out of their way, you know, looking through their window going, I see a guy in my store, what's going on over there. You know, to me, it's like, mind your business. You know who that guy is,

Starting point is 00:30:46 what's going on, why you would call a tyrannical government to come check a random person out. And maybe they're committing to crime, but the idea that that makes sense to you, I don't know, I just find that to be wild. I think that's the nanny state that they've created, you know, the paternalism they drive. Anyway, back to the point. Footage showed the men being arrested and sitting on the road shirtless while handcuffed. And they write indicating officers may also have suspected they were wearing suicide vests. That's quite the leap by these kind of platforms and it always drives me crazy, you know,

Starting point is 00:31:14 or I mean, or any number of things. My point is the idea that you can just jump from their shirts were off to maybe they were wearing suicide vests, it's possible, you know, or any number of anything you could fit in there. That's just not journalism. You're tailoring it towards Muslim terrorists. That's what this platform does. But it says viable incendiary devices and chemicals were found inside one of the vans, police said. Now, this is the only platform anywhere that I can find saying that, others that, other than those that are kind of parenting what Daily Mayor says.

Starting point is 00:31:44 Everybody else in like the mainstream has argued that this was something that has, been confirmed. Interesting to me. But the idea that, you know, actually, we've seen stuff like this before, though, chemicals and incendiary devices, what if it ends up being firecrackers and bleach? Wouldn't them? And that would literally, that would apply. Those words would batch. I don't know, but I find that really strange. And as it goes forward, I guess we'll find out. And if it ends up being something that's a nothing burger, remember what Trump said and remember how they use this. The men are in custody on suspicion of preparation of a terrorist attack and offenses under the explosives act. How would you have explosive

Starting point is 00:32:22 act charges without any evidence of an actual bomb so far from their reports? Or how would it currently be suspicion of a bomb if you have a bomb? Now it says it was the subject, to be clear, any number of those things could be cast away by bad reporting. Remember that. It was the subject of a warning from Iran's, what it says is the Fairford location is the U.S. Air Force's command outpost for operations from Europe

Starting point is 00:32:51 and has been used for American strikes on Iran's side. So that alone makes it a clear target. And it says it was the subject, this base, of a warning from Iran's Revolutionary Guard in July. Now, technically what it was, it says with the regime warning Britain not to allow U.S. bombers, right? So it's simply saying, because it wasn't just that base we don't like, it was saying simply because it was one of the, like a first example where Kier-Starmor allowed the U.S. U.S. to continue to operations. The base has been used from before that, but that they could then use it to conduct operations at Iran. I argue they probably already were. But so that then triggered

Starting point is 00:33:27 Iran going, okay, well, you're not, you know, publicly part of this. If you do that, you are a legal military target. Now, that's like I could tell. They haven't actually bombed Britain, just like they haven't bombed the United States, even though they would have the legal military right to do so today. Hope they don't. So realize that that's what that amounts to, is them going, we're going to, you are now military target if we choose to bomb that location. So that opens the door for this being somewhat Iran connected, other than I don't see why they wouldn't just bomb them publicly. You see what I mean?

Starting point is 00:33:55 Because they have the legal right to. But it says today's arrests are not believed to be part of a pre-planned operation. Meaning, police were previously unaware of the plot. Embarrassing for Trump. It should be because this guy will just bleed out anything that he make, he, in, it has to show you both a small, like, petty, I guess really more so insecurity, because if you have to lie about these things, it must demonstrate that he knows we don't see those things in him right now, that we doubt him, that we see the failures

Starting point is 00:34:25 in what he's conducting. So he needs to bite off on anything. Well, I did that. We got the plan and finished and we won. Pat me on the back and pretend that I'm good again. I mean, that's what it feels like. The arrests were not part of a pre-planned operation, meaning they were previously unaware of the plot, according to the Daily Mail. Here it says roadblocks and police are an armed police have been in place near the base in recent days. An emergency vehicles parked nearby? Okay, wait a minute. Now we're starting to get the hallmarks of classic events here.

Starting point is 00:34:59 Now, I want to stress, this isn't proof, guys. This is just my opinion, but recognize the hallmarks that we've seen. Right? Like, okay, now, again, you know, they said that their base was on guard because now here, again, it extends back to Iran saying that you're a target. As far as I can tell, there's nothing more than that, and that was months ago. all of a sudden you have a lockdown for the base under the guise of a terrorist threat before this happens. Now, okay, to be objective, you could argue they got insight.

Starting point is 00:35:27 Maybe they had, you know, intelligence going, we see something coming. Maybe Mossad said, hey, we see an event coming. And then Mossad got caught, you know, who knows how it all went down. Roadblocks and armed police have been in place in recent days. And emergency vehicles parked and ready. Why? Why does that make sense, anybody, based on the idea that we think, you know, okay, so you're going to, Have you done that with every base in the country?

Starting point is 00:35:49 Probably not. That's the same threat. It's not unique to the one base. Interesting. Now, the U.S. overlap, yes, but there's other bases you could point to. And now it says, having lived in the village for three years, he said he found it pretty safe, but added some other residents had noticed increased police patrols recently. Again, based on what?

Starting point is 00:36:10 I guess you could argue the same point. More patrols, more security. They think something's coming. To me, it indicates four knowledge. Either they did have an indication something was coming, which would simply, but would make sense. And if you believe this all went down the way they said it did, or they were setting this up. Which to some people, you're so crazy. I don't know why that's crazy seeing us how historically it's happened many times, you know,

Starting point is 00:36:33 but some people just don't want to accept that kind of reality. Now, again, and to be clear, I'm not saying I believe or know as a fact this is happening. We're just objectively considering this is a possibility, seeing us how it's happened before. We are working closely with our partners and are enacting the well, rehearsed plans we have in place. I just thought that was an interesting statement. You know, we're living through a live action exercise, you know, those kind of statements that you go, well, you know, that ultimately, you know, it's just, why would you say we're enacting the, you could argue that they have well rehearsed plans for emergencies. I'm sure that's something,

Starting point is 00:37:09 maybe that's probably what he meant or something else. But I just think that's interesting. And we're enacting the well rehearsed plans that we have in place. And then, lastly, it's says that month was protective screens were mounted on the base's perimeter fences in March to stop filming after it became popular with plane spotters. Seems odd. But that month, March, U.S. military personnel at the base were pictured preparing explosives at the base as Washington intensified strikes in Iran. Now, again, I'm not trying to jump at everything here.

Starting point is 00:37:40 My point is, again, you could argue they're preparing explosives to go after Iran. But is that common that you prepare explosives? on a UK base that you're going to use, or do you have them made into basis, you know, Raytheon and, you know, just, you know, something about this just stood out to me that I thought you would find interesting. Now you've got to, in March,

Starting point is 00:38:00 you've got U.S. personnel preparing explosives, and now there's a potential buy, the whole thing just feels weird. And the overall point, guys, is that right now, this is the kind of clumsy kind of act if this was a false flag attempt that I expect from this administration. But you guys can decide for yourself.

Starting point is 00:38:17 I'm just keeping those kind of things in mind. Oh, that's right. I did forget about some additional point that I found. So this is the standard. The R.A.F. Fairfoot, that's the base, Fairford-based terror plot, looking to do big damage, Trump says. My point is on, there's like six other articles that are not so subtly saying Trump

Starting point is 00:38:37 was making it up. The police or operation near the village of Wilford in Gloucestershire was not intelligence-led, meaning investigators had not known about the potential. a plot in advance. The press association understands. That's two separate things coming. So they're basically just going this way. It wasn't until that's a statement specifically following what Trump said. The article's making a point to say Trump's not, he's making it up. That's my opinion about what they did right there. I think that's important because of the fact that that is the U.S. president right now. And his choices are at least ostensibly guiding what happens here.

Starting point is 00:39:10 And the man is a floundering. I mean, it's just, I don't even know how to, accurate. describe the just consistent dishonesty, just pettiness, you know what I mean, vindictive, like criminality,

Starting point is 00:39:27 just everywhere. You see it. I don't need to stress it. And it's crazy that that state, you know, the objective reality can be called anything other than pointing out what he's doing

Starting point is 00:39:36 as he brags about these things. But back to the point, Che Bose points out, CIA warns Spain, France, and Italy that Russia might launch what is it, Gerberra drones from containers in the Mediterranean. No evidence, no proof, of course, just another round of anti-Russian hysteria.

Starting point is 00:39:55 Now, of course, could they do that obviously? Do they have the tech? Yes, would they do it? I have no doubt if they saw it was in their interest. What's interesting, though, is that doing that right now seems to be very much not in their interest. Why would they? You see, and this is the argument of like the self-interest point. Now, maybe, as always, maybe there's something that I don't see that makes it make sense. but think about the timing of all of this. There's multiple examples of this happening. Now, like I said, briefly mentioned,

Starting point is 00:40:22 it's just too much to get into today. What I'm hopefully going to get into to more tomorrow is the idea of the connection to what's happening in South America, which we've been covering extensively. Like, it's incredible. I mean, you already see the simple points that I'll go into in general, like Argentina is falling apart. Now, it's not just in South America either, by the way.

Starting point is 00:40:38 I see this is a global point. But, you know, El Salvador, for example, or Honduras we've talked about. And these places are strange. struggling guys. Like, Mala is a good example in Argentina because, you know, the Musk and everyone's like,

Starting point is 00:40:51 get ready for success and freedom. And it's just, you know, people, it's every which way you want to look at it. The economic side of it, the people, like Honduras and El Salvador,

Starting point is 00:41:00 people are being, people are currently some of those groups that are in those care of people, are fleeing because they have no jobs, because they have no, they're being attacked by the government to the streets. There's no civil rights,

Starting point is 00:41:11 guys. I mean, that's the literal, and I'll go through that in the next show. My point is that all this, I feel, next to a larger transition. Some of them are false flag efforts. Some of them are regime changes and coups. It's happening all over the place. Not new in the sense of how foreign policy is conducted,

Starting point is 00:41:25 but it's just happening a lot right now. So in this point, this is just what Colonel Towner Watkins points out. So in his opinion, in regard to the statement, the CIA's warning Russia might do X, Y, and Z. So NATO is going to launch drone attacks on their own countries and pretend Russia did it. Got it. That's his opinion. But realize that historically this is, if I, if I, to bet, that is more likely the way this would go. Not in any way because I think Russia isn't capable of doing it, but because it's historically more accurate that that's the kind of action you would get in these moments. And in addition, because it's, I argue, not in Russia's interest to do that, even secretly. My opinion. Here's another example. I thought this one was

Starting point is 00:42:06 especially interesting because this was a thought that we shared on the show, just my gut. Iran's president, I can't speak right now, Poschekian says Israel may have carried out a false flag on Saudi pipelines. Now, guys, this makes a lot of sense to me. Not because it's taking sides as much as people will always try to frame it that way, but just logically, if you think about what's been going on with Yemen, and I'm going to make a point about this today that's important to remember,

Starting point is 00:42:37 it's right now what you can see, Yemen is not, position for a lot of reasons to take on some of these places, despite how they've been successfully thwarting their efforts for a long time. It's my opinion based on, you know, it's an impoverished country. They have a lot of ability within that for plenty of reasons. But I don't think it would have been in their interest to do this at that moment only because it would then potentially bring a lot of negative attention on a country. And I don't know if they felt secure that, let's just say Iran or other countries would come to their defense. But I could totally be wrong in that sense because I also see how wildly beneficial that was.

Starting point is 00:43:16 I think that might have even won them the war. I just don't know if that logic was there before they decided to do that. If you get what I'm saying, it's just a thought. So my point would be, if this is the case, it makes sense because Israel, I could see rationalizing the attack on Saudi Arabia because they would yet again think it would bring the world together against Iran. Right? But I think things have changed far too much.

Starting point is 00:43:40 All that aside, though, here's what he is saying, that Israel may have carried out a false flag on the Saudi pipelines. He said, we in Yemen had no involvement in the attack on Saudi Arabia's pipeline. It's not unlikely that Israel carried out this action in order to inflame tensions and fuel disputes. The idea of the oil price and everything is clearly very important. So considering that in the larger picture, it's not unlikely that we're going to continue to see more of those kind of attacks. that drive the idea of what they want you to think Iran is doing, as well as the fact that keeps the world in a precarious position,

Starting point is 00:44:15 so they, I argue, are more willing to go along with what these people will push. But either way, it's an interesting time where I believe this is going to be happening more and more, and historically has been happening quite a bit. In regard to Iran that's driving, you know, most of what we're discussing right now, the idea, rather the situation itself, not Iran is the country, you might have seen that Iran yet again offered a deal. Now, you could argue they have bad intentions. It doesn't change the undeniable reality here,

Starting point is 00:44:43 that there was an offer to open the straight, which is what they claim they want. Even though it was open to start, that's just how they've fallen back on. They failed, guys, they've lost. And what we're going to end on this segment, I guess not end, but talk about in a minute, wherever that was,

Starting point is 00:44:59 by nearly every metric foreign policy, even, a very mainstream platform, by every metric, the U.S. is losing the Iran war. You know this because you're not ridiculous. But just even, you know, seeing even platforms like this break down the reality, it's important to understand because it's, as I've said before, there's plenty of thing, like, belligerent actions that could shift something. That's what a lot of us are worried about, hoping, you know, there's not some major thing that happens because, you know, nuclear attack or some kind of major event that drives people into chaos.

Starting point is 00:45:35 Because if you're failing dramatically, that's what you expect from belligerent entities like this. I hope that doesn't happen. But Iran offered the deal, as they've offered more than once. And as I said, you may argue that they're not good intention, but there's no way around this. The world is clearly perceiving this as Trump and Netanyahu being the ones keeping this going, especially since they only have in this point right now the same things that Trump already agreed to. So there's only one of two ways to look at it. He never intended to fall through, which is clearly the point. Or he's suddenly pretending like what he already agreed to is never allowed.

Starting point is 00:46:10 Either way you look at it, guys, the world, it can't go along with this long. I argue most of these other countries are well aware of all that we're saying, but it's politics. So they're playing along. But there's only so far you can go because their people start to get upset. Their supply chains are affected. that's where we are, I think. Iran offers deal to U.S. to reopen the straight. Trump rejects.

Starting point is 00:46:31 Iran has proposed a deal to the United States that would see the straight opened within a week, according to Argoschi, the foreign minister. Mr. Argochi said the plan was developed or delivered, excuse me, to the U.S. via Qatar, and revisited parts of the memorandum of understanding. Remember, the memorandum that they signed, that everybody signed Trump's signatures on there,

Starting point is 00:46:50 that even then on the record, people in that room admitted that Trump agreed to, it. And Trump agreed to the points of Lebanon, the whole thing. Then they went on to violate every single part of it. Literally on the record, well before Iran had any effort to do anything. They never even stopped bombing Lebanon. So that's obvious. They continue to threaten attacks. They did the forced efforts through the strait itself, as we'll make a point about today. It was admitted that now the thing we've been talking about, that Trump has been basically forcing or at least pressuring or working with ships to circumvent the route. So when Iran then responds,

Starting point is 00:47:22 they can go, oh, they cry foul, even though they've already agreed that they're supposed to be setting up the control, right? Well, now you're getting admits, they're admitting from the Gulf, the Gulf state countries. They're admitting that they're being pressured to do that. I mean, it's falling apart for them, guys, and that's really important because it shows you that this Trump and Netanyahu are driving what is the instability for their benefit. I mean, I would, I mean, they may think is for their benefit. It's not, but that's what they think they're doing, but it's at the extreme detriment to American interest. The choice now rests with the United States, he said,

Starting point is 00:47:58 adding that it could be done if the necessary conditions are met. Now, it says earlier the Wall Street General reported that the 80-year-old president was skeptical that Tehran would meet his demands. And added, he saw a renewed bombing campaign as likely. So his demands? This is what's so insane about this. His demands, as will continue to point out,

Starting point is 00:48:18 no nuclear weapon, and they refuse to say, No, he's lying, which, you have to understand that he has no interest in actually ending this if he keeps pretending that Iran refuses to end their program. Because every single opportunity, Iran is saying we don't want a nuclear weapon and we're not seeking one. So what you could pretend he's saying is they're lying, but he's not saying that. He's pretending that they're blatantly saying the opposite. And they're not. It goes back as long as you want to go.

Starting point is 00:48:44 You can still argue they're lying. But what it shows you is that Trump is creating a false back and forth to pretend something that's not happening so he can look like. like he is on the side of what's right. So when they don't meet his demands, that's one of them. The other is the straight, which they already offered to open. It's also the idea of what was the other one? Because I'm trying to think of what Trump.

Starting point is 00:49:05 Trump's things have fluctuated. Iran's have been consistent since April like I've been telling you. But see, my point in general is whatever's demands are. I don't think he even has demands that he needs met. I think he just continues to pretend like they refuse. So it makes them look like they're not agreeing. And then he goes on pretending, like they need to come to the table.

Starting point is 00:49:22 And the only thing happening right now is them refusing to accept what they've even already agreed to as Trump and Netanyahu. Mr. Trump also posted an image to his true social showing a map of the straight. Another one. Now it's the Trump's straight. That's just feeble and pathetic, guys. It's embarrassing. What do you think that's accomplishing other than you pretending like you're in

Starting point is 00:49:41 the strength position? It's sad, guys. And what's worse is you must know that he knows that. Like, you must know that he sees all of this. It's hard to watch that he knows that he's not, he's lost his people. Now, I guess there's a world in which he's being gaslit by the screaming morons around him, but who knows? We will not cease punishing the U.S. until Iran's seven conditions are met.

Starting point is 00:50:08 Sure sounds like somebody begging for a deal. I mean, you know, again, it's like we shouldn't even pretend. Like the idea that it's not a war, right? Are we just given up on that? They're now calling it a war. Like, how many lies do we need to pretend? So in this point, the idea, what was it? The, oh, I just lost the thought.

Starting point is 00:50:25 We will not cease punishing the U.S. until around seven conditions are met. Oh, whether they're weak and begging for a deal. Like, you can only look so many times back to recognize as I've shown you the entire time that they're absolutely not weak and begging for a deal. You could argue they're weak and just holding out. Maybe I disagree, but they're not begging for a deal. So when he keeps saying that, the evidence continues to prove to you that's not the case. And so at some point, this is the reality of all the people around him.

Starting point is 00:50:50 Like, you must realize that anybody not stating the reality of this is not on your side. Or at the very least, is willing to continue to pretend so they can gain something from Trump's benefit or his influence. Left and right, guys. If they're not out there saying that, then we, because it's obvious. Iran's plan calls for a secession of all hostilities. What a monster for seven days, including Lebanon, which they're not going to do because Israel will refuse to do it. The point was, after seven days, then they would. initiate the actual opening in the ceasefire. And the point was because never, never in my history

Starting point is 00:51:23 watching this as the U.S. upheld its part of the bargain entirely. Now, really hear what I just said, and that's not something I say lightly, never once in my entire time watching this in this situation, whether it was Yemen in the past, whether it was Syria, they've never upheld their part of the bargain. Guys, they're not an honest player. The whole world knows that at this point. They're just dishonest, sociopathic type people that will double cross their mother, for a nickel. So in this case, they knew they wouldn't. So they're saying, look, unless you agree to, you know, we can agree all day, right, but we're going to have a seven-day period where we wait for those things to be upheld. And until that point,

Starting point is 00:52:00 there's not going to be an opening. And they're just setting them up to be to fail. They know they will double cross them. They know Israel will keep bombing Lebanon. So they're creating a situation where either they reviews, which they did, which makes them look bad, or they agree and then fail to follow through. It goes the same thing either way. So it continues saying on the seventh day of the truth, Iran would reopen the straight. And Trump has said no. It's pretty simple, isn't it? I mean, you could argue before that it was things that Iran's going, give us the U.S. country.

Starting point is 00:52:31 Well, yeah, that's crazy, right? But these are all things that Trump has already signed to. And the only reason they didn't happen the first time is because they never intended to. But it makes them look pretty stupid to continue to pretend like anybody other than them are the ones maintaining this. but then of course he shows any plans to resume bombing after the election. Didn't you just say that the war was going to stop after the election? Like you can't make fun of this person enough. This guy will say anything in the moment that he feels needs to be said to achieve his goal,

Starting point is 00:53:00 even though you can prove he's lying. Even though on the outside of the building, he just said something different. I don't know why he thinks he can get away with that. It's pretty pathetic. Just again, case you missed it, he just told people that the war was likely going to come to an end after the election. The Democrats win. It's going to keep going. Or rather, he said both, by the way.

Starting point is 00:53:20 Don't forget the most recent one we covered. He then insinuated that the Democrats would win that they would stop the war. And I laughed about that too because I said, well, isn't that the war you said wouldn't happen? It just doesn't make any sense anymore other than this person's floundering. But yeah, we're going to continue bombing for the war you don't like after the election if you vote for us. Almost like he wants that.

Starting point is 00:53:40 But remember, as Saeed Mohamed Marendi points out that after he says he refuses the ceasefire. Remember this, he says, when the global and U.S. economies crash. Now, we hope that doesn't happen, right? All of us. Anybody, really, because that'll have cascading effects throughout the world, I argue. But overall, it's very likely with what's happening. And they are almost guaranteeing that. So in the world in which this is being engineered for the collapse of the West is something I worry about that Israel's been talking about for centuries, or for decades, well, it's starting to look more and more likely. Now, Walls, the guy who got sent to be a diplomat before being in the inner circle, because not they, I think they already knew, the world caught him using an Israeli intelligence app.

Starting point is 00:54:29 Of course, the mainstream media framed at a signal gate, as we've talked about, but it was telemessage. It was an Israeli intelligence app that archives signal, and it was sending it back right from the inner circle. And they quietly shoved him over to the U.S. that's how this works, or rather, as an ambassador. Department revealed to be using intelligence linked chat app. Anyway, that's the guy we're talking about. Another diehard Zionist. And that's not an opinion, by the way, very clear. Wall says Iran wanted sanctions relief up front.

Starting point is 00:54:57 Rejects a deal. Okay, so what they ask for is for you to stop sanctioning them, which, by the way, was in fact, a literal violation of the memorandum. Yes, I know, it's crazy, right? So they simply go, look, we want you to stop the illegal, you know, they're sanctions in their own right. I argue from an unilateral country, not from the global, the international community, I argue are illegal anyway.

Starting point is 00:55:18 The idea that one country can, you know, literally, the sanction is not supposed to be something, I mean, that's economic terrorism is what you're doing. You don't have the legal authority to level out sanctions to countries based on their actions in the globe. Either way, the point is that those are sanctions, illegal or not, that are one, originally a violation of them random that they already agreed to, and that was one of the things they continue doing, but also that it was something that was done because of the ongoing war and before. You're now saying you're doing it because they refused to end the war. So they're saying end that and will end the war. See how stupid that is? You were asking for this. You want that to happen,

Starting point is 00:55:53 but they don't, though. You see, that's how it feels. So by demanding the thing that you said they would get, nope, that's not going to happen. Well, it's pretty obvious that they don't even know what they want or they definitely don't want this to stop. Mike Walls, U.S. Ambassador of the UN, said on Sunday that President Trump rejected Iran's latest proposal because Tehran wanted sanctions relief and access to billions of frozen assets. Yeah, their money, right? So they want you to stop sanctioning them, which you already asked, said you would do and want the end of the war you claim and giving them their money you stole back. Crazy, right, before negotiating it ended the nuclear program, which by the way, he's not even on the table. They're not even talking about that. So this is

Starting point is 00:56:31 the same kind of games that Trump pretends like that's all he wants, but you already told us you ended that. You said they've obliterated that. You can't laugh about this enough. He says they were asking for everything up front with a promise that they would talk, then talk. That's not true. That's Mike Wals saying that. And this is what they said in response. I'm surprised, Aragachi said, that the ambassador is even talking about the seven-day plan is he's not even read it. Maybe he's not even gotten a copy.

Starting point is 00:56:55 They're just making fun of these people, guys. The reality is that he has no idea what he's talking about. Everything up front is not even remotely what they're even asking for. It was about a seven-day phase plan. You know, guys, it's obvious. The memorandum was also the same way. We'll set these things out. we'll meet these requirements and then we'll move forward.

Starting point is 00:57:11 You know, sort of also like the deal from before that with Gaza, where they said, okay, we'll have the deal and we'll set these tones out. And they never followed through with that. How about Lebanon, the ceasefire there? They never fell through with that. It's amazing we even have to pretend these people are honest actors. So when Mike Walls pretends that they wanted everything up front, what they wanted was what you already promised and already reneged on.

Starting point is 00:57:28 And then they would have an agree, you know, I'll go about it again. The bottom line, it's not about good and bad, right or wrong, who's the correct, it's about recognizing what they've seen, said and what they followed through with. Even, you know, dishonest actors can follow through what they say for their own interest. But what's clear is you have a consistent actor over here who's continue to do what they said and one that is not. If you can't see that by now, you're choosing to not see it.

Starting point is 00:57:54 Ultimately, it says the request that were included in the memorandum have now been broken down into stages. That's it. That's all they've done. So we can proceed accordingly to those stages. The very thing you already agreed to, and now you're balking at, they want to make a deal where they open the straight immediately because they're losing badly, Trump says. That's what he actually says.

Starting point is 00:58:12 We're winning tremendously. We have total control of the straight. You see how stupid that is? They don't. Everybody knows that. Everybody, because they're not controlling the straight because Iran is still clearly there in dictating what, but he just says it anyway. Maybe he is going senile.

Starting point is 00:58:28 Who knows? I mean, I don't even know how even he could rationalize saying it repeatedly. When you know, we know that's not true. We can prove it's not true. I guess one of the options is that he actually doesn't know that. somehow and that's pretty crazy. Here's what he said about this exact conversation. Look at it.

Starting point is 00:58:47 I mean, even just the way he looks, he looks haggard. He looks like he's having a hard time. I want to make a deal where they open the straight immediately because they're losing so badly. You know, you don't read that. But you are the one that continues to say that the street needs to be reopened, right?

Starting point is 00:59:07 So how is it that when they want the same thing that that's because they're losing when it's an acquies? I mean, ultimately, The whole point from the day one, the beginning has been that they have been blocking you guys from access. Even though you're blocking things to their ports, which clearly do have an effect, at the end of the day, you are the one continuing this. And Iran has found ways around this like they've been doing for decades. And so he can just keep pretending like that's somehow in their interest, but all he's doing is keeping the problems going for you. That's it.

Starting point is 00:59:33 So he can pretend he hasn't lost because he's a petulant child. That's what it feels like. So badly, the fake news, but we're winning tremendously. We have total control of the Harmo Strait. Massive amounts of oil are coming out of the Harmo Strait. Last night we had 29 ships come out. They want to make a deal. And I think that's fine.

Starting point is 01:00:02 I like making a deal too. Oh, he does want to make a deal. But that deal would not be acceptable. Right. Deal that you already signed, that we already agreed to. Same things. But now is not acceptable. Because what?

Starting point is 01:00:21 The same thing you said already? They're dying. You know why they're done because they have no money coming in? Because they get their money from the harm on straight. I mean, it's not even worth going into what a ridiculously simplified argument that is. He's just trying to relay what he thinks will work for the people that blindly follow him. Or maybe he's just that stupid. You guys, I mean, it's not an anti-Trump anything.

Starting point is 01:00:45 Biden is just as work. They're all the same thing to me. You just have to acknowledge what a floundering person this is. I mean, again, I'm not even getting into the fact that his entire. higher base is turned on him, you know, like we were telling you from January, I guess more than February, March, but it's clear and how far ahead of that, it's obvious, as we're probably going to get into more tomorrow. Now you've got people like Candace and Tucker talking about how they are recognizing the two-party illusion. I swear to God, I hope they're sure. I hope they

Starting point is 01:01:13 mean it. But part of me is going like, really? You know, I'm never voting again. I'm like, well, welcome the party. But what's interesting is they kind of are, though. They're kind of driving people that way. I don't want to get into it now. It's interesting, though, having, talk around a podcast talking about how, you know, maybe I was, I was tricked and I don't, I don't, I don't, my entire history of voting left and right has been all a scam. It's like, man, why would it be now that you see that because of what's been happening? You've had 70,000 example before this. Anyway, hey, I seriously wonder whether it's real. Not because I trust Dr. Carlson, but you watch it for yourself. And, you know, he does have a way about giving sincerity and

Starting point is 01:01:51 often when he's not, by the way, that's worth noting. But it's interesting, though. I might, my gut tells me it's because they're just trying to kind of co-op on what we're doing. Just independent media that have been telling you James Corbett forever about the two-party illusion, you know, and it's this kind of thing that is causing this to fly, you know, it's falling apart in front of people. So you get this kind of rapid, you know, my gut is it's going to be the system's broken, don't vote, it's all a big scam. And then, oh, except now we got a real group. So let's use them to fix the problem. Watch. That's my gut. But as I said, there's just, no question which nations are the ones perpetuating this madness, guys.

Starting point is 01:02:25 That Trump still pretends he controls the straight is not only a lie, it's pathetic, and suggests he's not the one controlling the situation at all. You could make up a better lie than that. Now, of course, the Iranian president slams the U.S. attacks and proclaims, we have no trust in the American side. Now, that's important because what they're saying is, like from April and well before that, is just letting you know, guys, we don't believe them. We don't ever take them at face value.

Starting point is 01:02:49 But what it shows you is a willingness to try to find a, find peace even with a belligerent, which is why they got, you know, commini got bombed and killed. I'm not saying, I argue it was in the right thing to try to find a level piece, you know, ground for peace. The point is that when you deal with these kind of monsters, that's what they do. Oh, you want peace? We'll kill your family.

Starting point is 01:03:09 Well, we'll pretend to have peace. We'll go right there with you. You'll shake your hand. We'll stay. And then we'll kill your family. That's what they do. It's what they've been doing my entire life, guys. Do I think Iran would do that in their interest?

Starting point is 01:03:19 I do. I think their government would do that if they were, in a position where that was in their interest. You may disagree with that. My point is right now, what we're looking at, you have to understand that they're simply going, we don't take what they say at face value. What they do is lie. But we're going to do our best to bring it there. And that has to show you which side is trying to achieve that. Of course, it could all work out where that turns out to be false. I think the evidence hand is pretty damn clear about which side is driving for that. And I do think it's because it's in their interest. Iran is going to gain wildly from this.

Starting point is 01:03:47 They already have. Look at their position on the world stage. We'll make this point right now in a second. pointing this out, Iranian letter says a member of Iran's assembly of experts claims that this is interesting. Mojitaba, Kamini survived multiple U.S. strikes after being injured. Now, this is an argument being stated, but it's interesting, and I'll go into the point that I want to share, but basically the point is, and I don't think we could bought, we should talk it all about the fact that they would do this, alleges that Kamini's son was transferred to a Tehran hospital.

Starting point is 01:04:20 and this is after they were bombing and almost got him, I guess. Three hospitals were targeted. Three hospitals were targeted in an attempt to get him. With, I think, what is it, Motaba reportedly rescued from the rubble following a third strike. You know, along with all of the innocent mothers and children and families and they were killed in the hospital because they were just trying to get him just in case. The official described his survival as divine and said it ultimately led to him becoming supreme leader. So yet again, them with their belligerent actions, causing the exact opposite of what they want,

Starting point is 01:04:52 unless maybe this is what is really ultimately wanted to drive this ongoing thing. But either way, the point is that they bombed multiple hospitals to hope they got this guy. Doesn't that sort of sound like when they bombed that entire... I mean, I can't remember the exact location off top of my head for some reason, but it was with Wolf Blitzer. And the IDF was on.

Starting point is 01:05:11 It was an Israeli government member, and they said they bombed that location, killed 400 innocent people because they thought the guy was there. Turned out he wasn't. And even Wolf Flitzer just couldn't absorb that because that's insane. But that was one of the moments when they changed,

Starting point is 01:05:23 moved the goalpost. I mean, bombing three hospitals and the hopes you get him is utterly sociopathic. It's psychopathic. And that's what they continue to do. And in case you weren't sure about,

Starting point is 01:05:36 I mean, and this goes back to March. You know how many they bombed since then? I can't even, it's more than we can count at this point. WHO confirms 18 attacks of health care facilities in Iran in March 11th.

Starting point is 01:05:49 That's just, this is Asia. Just, you know, tagging those two things together. Thank you for doing that. But how is that even possible? Are they all secret military? They're not, guys, they're not. You can literally prove that right now. They're not even claiming that, by the way.

Starting point is 01:06:06 Now, you have Mint Press News reporting, and this is on the 25th. An Emirati ship struck by Iran in the Strait of Fremus. The vessel attempted to pass through the area with U.S. supervision. Right. So the wrong location, first of all, and with U.S. ships that are being told you're not allowed to go through. What do you think is going to happen? And we'll say with a cruise missile.

Starting point is 01:06:25 At least one fatality was reported. I haven't confirmed that. I think this was, oh, you know what? I did forget to follow. This is on 25th. I should have followed up on that. I forgot to have come back. So if everybody knows in the chat, let me know the result of that.

Starting point is 01:06:36 I'm not going to do it real quick since we're in the midst here. But why I want to report this is the first part, is that you could, and this is not new. You've had multiple videos where Iran's on the radio going turn around. This is the wrong route. We are going to deter you. if you continue this route. Same thing here, as I can tell, as far as I can tell,

Starting point is 01:06:54 they didn't sink the ship. It's about deterring them and they know the threat because of what they're doing is deliberate, right? So remember, US is forcing this, causing these casualties, and this is,

Starting point is 01:07:06 the memorandum of understanding is what they signed, which gave Iran the ability to dictate that next step. Now, of course, they've reneged on that, but nonetheless, Iran is still in the control like they were before that

Starting point is 01:07:16 in regard to the straight, and they're saying, you can't take this route. So that then dovetails with this. Ships in the Strait of Fremuz are emailing Iran apologizing for transiting through the unauthorized route and blames the charterer for forcing them to take the route. You are watching a coordinated effort to make this conflict happen. The emails have some white redacted parts containing names, et cetera.

Starting point is 01:07:43 Persian Gulf Strait of authority, the Persian Gulf Strait Authority issued a statement in light of new activity in the Strait of Ramos. Reports have been submitted to the PGSA indicating that some charters are forcing vessels to travel through unauthorized routes. Why would you do that if your interest was getting your delivery? Your shipment? You're doing that for politics. You're doing that so it makes Iran look like they're belligerent. And so Donald Trump can pretend that they're the ones violating what's happening.

Starting point is 01:08:10 You just can't get any more blatantly dishonest. In addition to creating a risk of financial losses and casualties, its owner, captain and crew, such actions could also result. in serious restrictions of that vessel's future passage. Ship owners are advised to exercise due caution regarding such illegal actions. Furthermore, if violations of charterers are confirmed, those companies will be added to the noncompliance list, and then you'll be not able to pass anyway. You have to understand, Trump's already been responsible for multiple examples that you can prove, where he's, and this has been reported by ships, by others, where they're driving this. In this case, you now have them apologizing going, we don't want to do this. They're forcing us

Starting point is 01:08:47 in hopes they don't get bombed. It's just, this is manufactured. That's what you can understand right now. It's a manufactured conflict. It was an illegal attack to start with. They used false information to justify what they did. I mean, Israel drove this, guys, that mean with Trump in the classroom, where Netanyahu's going, who won't do attack Iran for me?

Starting point is 01:09:06 And you got Obama and Clinton and Trump's going, me, you know, it's like, it's obvious that this is the person that was played. Or, alternatively, the only one that was compromised enough to allow this to happen at your expense. Brett Erickson also points out in regard to financial times, medicines run short for Iran under U.S. sanctions. How long have we been telling you this? You know, they go, we don't, sanctions don't block medicine and food.

Starting point is 01:09:30 Yeah, they do. They're literally aimed at those things, just like they were in Yemen, just like they were in Gaza. As Erickson says, I've said it for over and over and over again. One of the primary goals of the U.S. blockade and sanctions is to cause food and medical supplies short shortages. It's guys, if you, Kissinger wrote papers about this. The sanctions are designed to make people suffer.

Starting point is 01:09:53 I can show you the clip of Giuliani, praising how Iranians are selling their organs for food. And this is how you create good revolution. That's because of sanctions. You can have a percent bragging about how they collapsed the entire economy and drove the entire thing today. It's all there. So, yep, they're hurting innocent children, women, people suffering in hospitals because they're monsters. Now, the Yemen part of this is, again, kind of laughable, seeing as how this is not a new story, Los Angeles Times, a new flashpoint, laughable, new flashpoint.

Starting point is 01:10:28 The Baba Mandib straight, the reality of this whole point, I mean, they've even called it a flashpoint before, but it says the narrow straight called the Ghost, the Gate of Tears. Today, report. The village shares its name with the Bob El Mandib Street, the narrow passage. such way connecting the Red Sea and the Arabian Sea. That's become another flashpoint in the U.S. Israeli war on Iran. It says, quote, you hear so much about Bob El Mandeb, you'd think it would be like New York with skyscrapers and money.

Starting point is 01:10:57 Well, you know why it's not? Because it's been under a starvation campaign for a decade plus because the Israeli government, the U.S. government, the Saudi government don't want them to suffer, to exist without their foot on their neck. And that is literally the provable reality as I'll point out. I'll prove to you in a second. But what bothers me. me is that because of this new evolution of the story, you've got groups like this who know well

Starting point is 01:11:19 about the history, they know well about the ongoing blockade starvation blockade that went on well past 2022. And yet they reported as if this is not even close to what's happening. It says so many ships passed near here. If the Yemeni government knew how to invest in it, we would be rich. Yeah, it's like too bad Yemenis don't understand money. Stupid cave dwelling Muslims. Like what? This is so crazy to me. If the government, and by the way, the Yemeni government is the Ansarala movement at this point. The Yemeni government they're pointing to is the guy ran by Hadi in Riyadh. The government backed by the U.S. and Saudi Arabia that lives in Saudi Arabia that doesn't

Starting point is 01:11:57 exist in this conversation. And the only reason they don't have money is because you guys have been robbing them blind forever, because you've been stealing from them because you've been manipulating their government. If the Yemani government knew how to work with money, we would be rich. It's just, it's like saying Gaza would be the Riviera if they knew how to a management. You mean if they were being stolen from and genocide it? Yeah, it might work out.

Starting point is 01:12:19 It's the exact same story here. We should be bringing in billions of dollars. He says, instead, you look around. Pausing, it says, pausing his gaze to look in the sorry-looking boats haphazardly laid on the beach. He says, we have nothing. And why do you have nothing? Because you have been systematically starved and threatened and bombed and stolen from. My entire life doing this.

Starting point is 01:12:43 I documented, too. And yet, you know, I don't see them including that in the next paragraph. That's funny. I'll show you next. But this month, control of the Balbo-Mandab Strait switched once more. When the Houthis, Yemeni rebels, backed by Iran, or rather the Yemeni people backed by Iran that actually want their sovereignty back in their country, ousted government forces from the waterway in a blitzkrieg, which they seized all of Yemen's Red Sea coast. About 7% of the global energy supplies and around 12 to 15% of all global shipping go through that straight. It's almost being wildly underplayed

Starting point is 01:13:19 how important that was. And it says, and in taking Parham Island, which is kind of in the center right there, it says at the narrowest point, a mere 12 and a half miles where they can harass ships with ease, which they've said. All they had to do was place a few artillery units

Starting point is 01:13:33 on the coast of Perim Island and they would be able to strike any ship crossing the strait. And people know that. Now, remember, as I reported recently, they're saying, look, we're at war with Saudi Arabia. Now look, they know. they know very well that they're also war with the U.S. government and with Israel and all the groups that are, they know that. They're not stupid. Trust me. This you can, in fact, you can look into

Starting point is 01:13:52 their own conversations and they're very, very much talking about it. The point is right now, they're playing this game, I think. And they're going, look, fine. We have a ceasefire, right, Trump, even though they know they don't care about those agreements. Trump, it's in his interest right now to pretend like he's not getting involved because he doesn't want another quagmire. That's what I think. But what's interesting is they're going fine. We're going to keep battling Saudi Arabia and you guys can leave us alone, right? mark my words, the moment that it's in their interest, that won't be what happens anymore. And it might be very soon. It might have already been happening. And it might just amount to the

Starting point is 01:14:22 U.S. government taking action before that even comes around. Because Saudi Arabia has been asking Trump to help, and that was their agreement even. And they said no. Trump said no, as it says right here. With the Israeli-U.S. war on Iran prompting Tehran to seal the Strait of Pramuz, cutting off the world's most important energy passageway, Persian Gulf oil powerhouses have been forced to divert crude exports to alternatives like the Babamandib Strait. It's almost like you're watching my show from 2015. The Houthis have a long-running animus against the Saudis. Yeah, because they starve them to death, murdered their families, raped and tortured them.

Starting point is 01:14:55 Yeah, all on the record, by the way, which began in 2015. Well before that, months after the Houthis overran the Yemeni capital of Sanaa in 2014. Right. You mean, when they took back the capital, you guys, hopefully you don't forget that. I'm not going to keep repeating myself, but it's just gross how these people misrepresent such obvious history. Saudi Arabia spooked about the notion. of an Iranian ally on its border, okay, led a coalition

Starting point is 01:15:18 with the U.S. backing to dislodge them. As I've always said over the years, it was a U.S. agenda with Saudi Arabian help, but the report was the Saudi-led U.S.-backed effort. It started a blockade and a devastating air campaign that persisted until 2022 truce. Oh, did it?

Starting point is 01:15:35 You mean other than the blockade that the Yemenis were screaming about ending in May 2026? Other than that, it's pathetic, guys. You think they can't look this stuff up? You think they don't know that you could literally prove the blockade? You know how I know that? Because the L.A. Times reported about the ongoing starvation in Yemen well after 2022.

Starting point is 01:15:54 These people should be embarrassed with themselves. But you see, that's not the world we live in today. Their job is not to tell the truth when it really matters. That's my opinion. It says, but in July, the ceasefire broke after Dahutis accused the Saudis of striking Sanaz Airport in what appeared to be an attempt to stop Iranian flights from landing there. Are you seriously going to kick? gaslight us about a bombing of an airport?

Starting point is 01:16:19 Yes, they are. What happened, as you can clearly see, Saudi Arabia bombed their airport and killed civilians, which might have been an effort to stop Iran. So what? That's still a war crime, right? Los Angeles Times? Crickets.

Starting point is 01:16:32 You know what I mean? Like, just gross. I wish people like this, I wish you could shove it in their face. I wish they'd be standing right here and be like, you know better and you're disgusting. Not that it matters, but it just kills me. So, yeah, so they bomb the airport.

Starting point is 01:16:46 And that's okay when they do it because maybe Iran, right? The Houthis began attacking Saudi Arabian oil infrastructure and declared a naval blockade against the kingdom. Oh, so the only mention of a blockade comes from when you want to, when you want to say that the Houtis started a blockade, which, yes, good. And the same thing they were doing, it's Israel before this. But the ongoing starvation, which are effectively has been somewhat thwarted now because they took control of that location. But right up until recently when they did that, they had still had the blockade. that was still starving them, which was illegal. No question.

Starting point is 01:17:20 International law, been there for a long time. They all know that. Saudi leaders reportedly reached out to Trump, of course, to stop them, and he declined. Which is my point. Saudi Arabia is furious about that. Their entire agreement is about that military defense when they need it. Still, it says on Wednesday, Marco Rubio said, quote, we have a very strong defense agreement with Saudi Arabia, and we will live up to our commitments.

Starting point is 01:17:44 See, so who knows if that's, you know, placation or that's, you know, that they're going to feel like that maybe Trump just said no and Rubio's going to be like, stop, you know, we have to do something. Who knows? We'll see. For their part, the Houthis insist, the real name is their Ansarola movement. They have no plans to attack shipping on the Red Sea and that their blockade applies only to Saudi Arabia. But that's huge. And they know that. You see, they're playing this very tactfully, you guys, Saudi Arabia and their interest in regarding the oil is huge. It's very relevant what the U.S. and Israel are doing in regard to Iran.

Starting point is 01:18:18 So if they just do that, they can present themselves as not, we're just going against the guy that's been attacking us, but it will eventually drive action that U.S. has to take and will make them look even, so they're playing this very well. And it's not going to end up, you know, in a global visual sense looking good for Trump.

Starting point is 01:18:36 I argue. But leaders in the internationally recognized humanity government say to Houthis are not to be trusted. You mean the government living in Riyadh? That's what they're talking about. internationally recognized by what, the U.S. and the UK and Israel. That's what that means. It's not internationally recognized by the majority of countries.

Starting point is 01:18:54 It's pathetic, guys. It's the same thing they did with all of this. When they go, the internationally recognized government in Gaza or whatever, it's when you look around, you've got like seven countries they're pointing to when they do that. It's not true. And at this point, guys, you can easily prove that the people of Yemen support the Ansarala movement. You can easily prove that what we're actually pointing to is an illegal coup and regime change that took place.

Starting point is 01:19:16 I mean, it's on the, it's pathetic that these groups have to continue to lie about it. Now, like I said, in a letter to the UN, Yemen calls for an end of the blockade. Yemen, not the Yemeni fake government. They pretend that lives in Riyadh, the actual Yemen people, the Ansarol movement, wrote the UN going, hey, we are under attack. We are being starved to death in 2026. That's been going on for a decade. I mean, you can look up, I mean, here, check this out.

Starting point is 01:19:46 I haven't looked this up in a while. Let me just type this in. Yemen, leaf paste. Watch. Isolated and unseen. Yemenis eat leaves to stave off famine. That's 2025. That's three years after the so-called truce they just pointed to in 2022. That's funny. LA Times. It's almost like you don't know the AP exists.

Starting point is 01:20:05 Isolated and unseen. Yemenis eat leaves to stave off famine. In a remote pocket of northern Yemen, many families are starving with starving children, have nothing to eat but leaves. Now, that doesn't mean that's the only place they're starving. It means in this one location, they're choosing to go with these leaves. they have there that they can they boil and ground up and eat because it's all they had but it's it the amount of coverage of this goes back a long way and you know this because you've watched this show

Starting point is 01:20:29 because we've talked about this for a very long time oh man I put this on the wrong oh shoot okay I'm going to stop closing tabs it looks like I forgot to save my tabs today shoot I've done that before but I believe I can reopen enough of them when I'm done to get most of them for you guys So for those hearing me, you don't know what I'm talking about. I always include all my tabs underneath the show when I'm done. Sometimes I forget to save them. I forget why. I send you, who knows why.

Starting point is 01:20:57 But I think I'll be good because I can reopen the tabs and get them back. So we'll leave it there. Remind me. Tell me those more tabs. So anyway, the point is May 26. Calling for an end to the over 10 years of blockade of the country. Urging secession of aggression measures taken by the nation by the U.S. and its allies. But yeah, L.A. Times.

Starting point is 01:21:19 tell us about how there's been a truce and the Yemeni, the Ansarala of the Houthis are the ones that caused this to start again. Oh, shoot, right there. See you. There I go. Close my tab. Son of a gun. So the reason I want to keep them open is because you can only reopen so many. All right. Leave it there. Don't close anymore. So here is the Reuters. 2017. In blocking arms to Yemen, Saudi Arabia squeezes a starving population blocking arms. It's gross. Even then, what we're really talking about is the same game they're playing in Gaza and still are. That they were just pretending like they were stopping bad things.

Starting point is 01:21:59 And what they were doing was literally starving children to death. And they know they were doing that, guys. Now, foreign policy, this is last week. By nearly every metric, the U.S. is losing the Iran War. In early March, U.S. President Donald Trump said that the United States had already won the war against Iran. Now, most of this, you know, I mean, all of this, you know. But I think it's just worth noting just to quickly go through this, that this is even what the mainstream is reporting now about, and you could argue that there's different sizes,

Starting point is 01:22:30 and there are in some cases. But what they report in this is not debatable. He said this, and this is what happened. He promised this one, and this is where we are. Guys, you just, and people that pretend like, all we wanted was the straight back open. You're just, you're either a liar or you, I can't even fathom how you can be so stupid, because if you care about the story, you can go back in day one and hear him saying the opposite, saying that all the things they were going to do and all the proxy, all things we're going to go through in this article.

Starting point is 01:22:57 Not allow their influence in the area, not allow them to control the straight, not all of which they bailed. Again, said they won the war in March. And it says, but he's still to finish the job, whatever that means. But the job, as they write, remains unfinished with no end in sight to this day.

Starting point is 01:23:17 That alone, It's enough. He lied. Or he just doesn't want to admit that he's not doing what he said he did. Trump on Wednesday said that hopefully we are toward the end of the war. Yeah, you know, the one that he won in March. He's now saying, but it's not a war, though. In hope we can end that in the near future, the war, that's not a war that we said we won. It's just very, very embarrassing. There's little evidence that Tehran is eager for an agreement that everybody can see that even foreign policy can outline. Trump's saying they're begging. Well, they're not. We all know that. How pathetic. Overall, the conflict has been a strategic disaster for Washington. The fighting has exposed

Starting point is 01:23:52 serious vulnerabilities for the U.S. military and left its forces spread thin. Get this, guys. Cost the United States and I'm willing to bet you it's a lot more than this, an estimated $38 billion so far and caused a global energy crisis. But yeah, you're winning, though, right?

Starting point is 01:24:10 Nobody believes that anymore, if they ever did to begin with. The war is extremely unpopular with American voters and a growing number of Republicans in Congress are voting in favor of ending the Constitution. conflict. Yeah, too late, though. I don't care what you guys do now. You're all culpable. You're all complicit. Every one of you failed to do your only job by allowing us to continue. One GOP congressman, Massey, has even moved to impeach defense secretary Pete Hegseth over the war, which I'm glad because he's a

Starting point is 01:24:36 criminal, but he's only doing what Trump tells him to do. Like, to just not go after Trump. I mean, the argument was if you want to look at it like it's honest, it could be. Maybe he just thought that was impossible that going after Trump, he just felt wouldn't be politically possible in the current climate. Who knows? Still think it should happen. But either way, they both deserve to be held accountable. So too does Biden and Blinken and everybody else. But for all of those costs, the United States has achieved very little in Iran. And in some cases, things have even gotten worse. By nearly every metric from Iran's ability to project power in the region, there we go, by nearly every metric from Iran's ability to project power in the region, to its military capabilities, to the strength

Starting point is 01:25:25 of its regime, to the status of its nuclear program, the United States is losing the war. What's more, Tehran has now proved that it can shut down the strait of Phrmoo's long, long term, an ability it long boasted of having, but had never actually demonstrated. Yeah, I know, again, the thing that we've known for decades, that they acted like it was a new story when this happened because they played on the ignorance of American people. The truth is that they've always known this, And they knew, and that's why before Netanyahu, I believe, convinced Trump that that's what would happen. And that's why they didn't do it. I mean, think about being, you know, both the U.S. and Israel, this projected ideas of how great their intelligence is.

Starting point is 01:26:00 Now, you know, they're the world leaders on the world. Everything is the best in what they do. And they're, you know, whatever. They frame themselves as being so far ahead of everybody. And yet you can't take a step back and go, maybe, maybe Iran has worked around what we've been screening to the world for 10 years. maybe, maybe they put some ships under the mountains and the clouds, maybe because we've been yelling about how, you know, come on. Like, think about the lack of foresight.

Starting point is 01:26:24 I mean, they are just not as good as they pretend to be. Or at the very least, that over the last so many administrations, we've gotten people in these positions that just are so incompetent, they can't even function. I don't know. You can decide. But just realize, you know, there's so many directions taken. The point of just the straight again is that it's so obvious,

Starting point is 01:26:45 clearly that they've had that ability that they know they could have and instead of going, well, maybe they might go a different path. Maybe they've thought beyond just the reaction that we all yell they're going to do. Instead, just go through the motions. And Iran goes, well, we're not going to do what you expect us to do. And then they just fell headfirst into their own problem. Clearly, that's what happened, guys. I mean, there's more to it, I'm sure.

Starting point is 01:27:08 But at the end of the day, it was clear that they convinced Trump that this would end. The world would be on your side because Iran would go after everybody. And even then, they tried to frame their response. to the countries involved in their attack as them attacking their neighbors, they still are to this day. It's just weakness, guys. You have to see that. If you have to lie about such basic things, you are in a weak position. Quote, if you wind the clock back to February and take a look at what the U.S. stated it was trying to do, according to foreign policy, and I agree, it's irrefutable that the U.S. has failed in its main strategic goals. I shouldn't even have to blabber this point,

Starting point is 01:27:43 but some, I guess, need to hear it, because it's obvious, I think. When this is from a Iran, an expert, whatever that means in the United States today. The United States was aiming to dismantle Iran's ability to project power outside of its borders, both today and in the future, was their exact statement. But there's no evidence to suggest that the United States has accomplished this. The fact that the conflict has for months been centered on a fight to control the strait, a waterway that was open when the war began, is indicative of Tehran's enduring capacity to influence the course of events both in the Middle East and the wider world.

Starting point is 01:28:16 Obviously. Now, think about the kind of people lying on the world stage about this right now, right? The dissents, the Scott Jennings, you know, their job is to gaslight you about what Trump wants. That's what they do. Every day they yell things out like Jesse Waters and the rest. Different point, media versus political, but same thing. Every day they're shown to be lying. Every day, Jesse will get up there with his smug, well, looks like he won the war today.

Starting point is 01:28:41 And just, nope, and does it again tomorrow. You got a laugh. You know, they know their job. Tehran and the Houtis for months warned that the Bob Elmandam Strait could be closed if the United States continued the war. And they are now in a position to make good on that threat. Yep. We've been telling you for a long time. They are now growing, there are now growing concerns that Yemen is on the verge of returning to a full-blown civil war.

Starting point is 01:29:06 See my point, though, how can anybody with honesty? Like, you can still argue that they're in the right side fighting against terrorists, but to pretend the civil war is just you going with the narrative, know the team wants. It's not a civil war, guys. Neither was, you know, any of these situations we're talking about. Syria was not a civil war. Now, there are elements that drove, you know, like we can talk about Iran and the protest.

Starting point is 01:29:31 There's very clearly elements in Iran that were protesting their government. And you could argue that could be driven to a point of civil war. If at the end of the day, though, that's not where they were. It's not what happened. But the idea of pretending that that was, you know, what ultimately happened, which was driven by Mossad and intelligence and murdering, burning policemen in the streets was not a civil war, but that's what they would call it. Here in Yemen, we're talking about an invasion and occupation, a regime change, and an effort to

Starting point is 01:29:58 remove them from power. You can't, you know, calling Hezbollah fighting against the occupied government in Lebanon a civil war is not a civil war. Just because they are in Yemen or in Lebanon and pretending to be the government, I mean, that's the only reason they call it a civil war, because in effect, you're talking about groups within fighting for control of that one location. but they're outside forces. It's like it'd be the equivalent of the U.S. taking over Lebanon

Starting point is 01:30:22 and then having them fight the U.S. out and calling that a civil war. Just because the U.S. is in control doesn't make them Lebanon. So it's frustrating. And they know that, guys. They know that. It's obvious. The history is there. I've read articles on foreign policy that gets into the nuance of that.

Starting point is 01:30:36 But that's the game, guys. The Trump administration also launched the war with the objective of destroying Iran's ballistic missiles. Remember that whole big push? That was the main thing to be. the drones and the missiles and Rubio's that's the only thing. Well, in April, Hegzath said Iran's missile program was functionally destroyed. You know, and then we continue to see missiles fly and hit very important locations and they pretend like it's destroyed again the next day.

Starting point is 01:31:00 And it says that the country could quote, no longer build missiles. Trump has also claimed that Iran's military has been totally destroyed. Yeah, like every other day since the beginning and then goes on to attack another element or gets attacked themselves and we pretend like that's truth, I guess. Tehran's continued ability to launch attacks on targets across the region with both missiles and drones shows that this goal remains elusive. Now, even that's a false statement because they've even proven that they've been able to increase their output. They've shown that they're able to increase and use new weapons that they haven't shown yet.

Starting point is 01:31:31 They've done that more than once. But it goes, and that Trump administration has greatly embellished its military successes. Again, a very generous way to say that. Intelligence assessments also contradict the Trump administration's public claims. Iran has reportedly resumed ballistic missile production in underground facilities, even after thousands of U.S. strikes targeted those very missile facilities and launched sites the early days of the war. Yeah, maybe, just maybe they planned ahead.

Starting point is 01:31:57 Maybe, just maybe they thought, well, they're going to bomb these locations, so maybe we should move them somewhere else. I mean, it's just, I don't know, that's what Iran very clearly indicated before this is that they were planning for this for a long time. And that's why they went to the U.S. before February 28th and said we know they're going to attack us. And if they do, we're going to bomb the people that bomb us just so you know. And they did. Good luck trying to make that a terrorist attack when they told the UN they were going to respond within the law, which is what happened. It's crazy,

Starting point is 01:32:26 isn't it? But so that's obvious, right? Their ballistic missiles are continuing. And it says regime change. When the war began, it was clear that toppling Iran's leadership was among the White House's key goals. And really what ultimately happened was Trump just pretended he got a regime change because there was a new guy there, even though that's not even remotely what that actually amounts to and what it means. And that's remember he tried to pretend like, we've gone through multiple regimes, like three different layer. Guys, very clearly not true. Kamani's son stepped in afterward and that's what it's been sense. And they just keep lying about it. The regime remains very much intact and in many ways has only calcified. Yeah, they're stronger

Starting point is 01:33:03 because of what they did to them is what it appears to be. Insofar as regime change was a goal, U.S. action has been almost entirely counterproductive. The regime is now more entrenched. It is more confident of its position inside of Iran, says one of the experts. Now, on the nuclear program, it says more than any other issue, Trump has repeatedly returned to Iran's nuclear program

Starting point is 01:33:24 as the primary objective of the war. The president has also misleadingly claimed that the United States obliterated Iran's program, which wasn't the truth in the reality, right? We're talking about the attacks on some of them. In regard to the enrichment facility, best I can tell, they did destroy that, which is interesting seeing as how that then makes it clear that there's no way

Starting point is 01:33:47 they could be debilting, you know, but at least from what we can prove. But even as he justifies continuing the war, after he's obliterated, he says, even as he justifies continuing the war for the sake of preventing Tehran from obtaining a nuclear weapon. Like, these are obvious contradictions that we could laugh about. Like, you could argue that they might be building back in that direction, but that's, you know, if you claim you obliterated it, you know, long that would take. And so the idea that they're, you know, we need to step in and stop them now. It doesn't line up, guys. And he's playing it both ways.

Starting point is 01:34:16 That's what they do. That's very Israeli propaganda of him. Despite such rhetoric, the Trump administration's actions increasingly indicate that Iran's nuclear program has been bumped down the White House's list of priorities. Now, they use the idea of them agreeing not to do it as this kind of hanging point in the agreement, but that's my point is they are saying that. They've already said they don't want to. And so what they're doing is using the claim as a false point.

Starting point is 01:34:41 point. Iran's made clear they don't have one, they don't want one. So by him claiming they refused to announce that, he's pretending that's happening so he can keep this from moving, which to me shows you either that he doesn't want it to happen or that he's not able to do it, that he's somebody else is guiding this whole show. Amid the lack of progress on the nuclear issue and the failure to achieve its initial goals in the war more broadly, the Trump administration has shifted its attention to other objectives. The administration has moved to strangle Iran's economically via both naval blockade and financial campaign, which, by the way, again, well, you know, blockade, these things are very clearly designed to hurt people.

Starting point is 01:35:17 But Iran's leadership has withstood economic pressure from United States for decades. I mean, Trump pretended it was, what was the other one? This one's economic fury, economic outcast, was the other one, economic fury? I don't know. It was something like that. And it was, as Trump said, the biggest worst ever of all time. Okay. Well, it didn't work.

Starting point is 01:35:38 maximum pressure, whatever there. He's all these different names. At the end of the day, it didn't work. Now, yes, it had very clear effects. And yes, it hurt the people in that country, which they turned around then and blamed Iran for, which makes no sense. And it's obvious.

Starting point is 01:35:50 But at the end of the day, it's obvious that this is a desperate move and they don't know what else to do because it's not going to work to do the same thing over again. The process involves, under Hormuz, the straight. The process involves the U.S. Navy and air assets

Starting point is 01:36:04 providing defense for tankers moving through the straight and small convoys. It really, it's talking about them. This is interesting as hell to me, that we're talking about this game of them moving oil through the straight. I think I put it right here somewhere. There. Is that they're claiming this.

Starting point is 01:36:22 And of course, Axios, and of course, Barack Ravid, because we know we can trust them, right, are arguing that they've sent 60 million barrels through the straight in the last 72 hours. Well, sure possible, isn't it? Even though the evidence says it's not the case, even though GPS trackers say it's on the case, even though all the different reporters say it's not the case,

Starting point is 01:36:38 even though the Hormuz report trackers is not the case. And even though, I mean, on and on. Or, you know, the other 13 times he's made this claim. It's turned out to be a lie. But maybe this time, Brett Erickson is just simply saying that, you know, I'll wait at a second, actually. Wait.

Starting point is 01:36:55 Oh, that's right. Confusing myself. I forgot I wasn't closing these. Here we are. What it's saying is we got four, you know, basically this is crazy to me. They're actually making this argument, saying that while around four to five million of barrels

Starting point is 01:37:08 were flowing through the straight daily in August. That number is now approaching about 10 million. We're claiming that they're getting more oil through than that. I think that's flatly false. And I think the evidence shows that's false. Always possible there's some secret mechanism. But that's the thing. What they're saying is the process they're pointing to involves the U.S. Navy and

Starting point is 01:37:27 air assets providing defense for tankers moving through the street. Okay, wait a minute. Listen to what we were just talking about. You are then forcing things to go through avenues that are going to cause and draw attacks. And the reality is that that's something that you already agreed to give them through the memorandum is the control over manufacturing or rather managing that new direction. And arguably, these groups wouldn't need defense if you just let them go through the route that Iran requested.

Starting point is 01:37:54 So it's like so arbitrarily manufactured, like they're just organizing this. The fact that you're sent, again, realize, I don't even think this is happening. I think they're lying about the oil to get, because realize that oil price only keeps going up. If you were sending through millions of, that would change the price without question. What they do is then pretend like they're keeping the price high because they were going to, they do that too. But it's obviously not the oil price.

Starting point is 01:38:21 That would be the price at the, you know, anyway, there's, I just think they're lying. A lot of that's my opinion. The system has steadily increased the flow of oil through the straight over the last month. It hasn't, though. And while it's helping to delay a general crisis in energy markets, Bruce said it's not removing the risk. the price of Brent crude sat around $104 just recently. So it doesn't make any sense.

Starting point is 01:38:43 Just before the war began in February, it was $72 a barrel. So Trump keeps telling you, it's all Biden or it's going to go down afterward. And there's no indication of that. In fact, it's near impossible that we're going to see this even come close to getting back to where it was after the election in general, let alone if it even changes. Even then, it's going to take a long time to re what's the word? you know, to get back to kind of, but basically the supply chain issue is not something you just reestablish. You have long-term supply chain issues that are being created over this

Starting point is 01:39:14 and oil being one of them. But it's just, this is obvious that they're lying about this to try to change the price, but also that they're pretending they're gaining something. A White House official on background told foreign policy that Ron is calling constantly and is desperate for a deal. So anybody willing to say something so utterly laughable that we all know isn't true, why would you believe them about oil or barrels or anything believe them about what the shirt they wore

Starting point is 01:39:40 that day? I mean, they're just liars, guys. And it says, but the president is, quote, only open to making a good deal with Iran, whereby they permanently renounce their desire for a nuclear weapon. Right, despite continually doing that. The official said also that they, while Trump is open to talks under the right circumstances, he has no need to negotiate. I keep laughing about this. How can you simultaneously tell us that you want a deal and that you're trying to make a deal, I'm not going to negotiate with them. So are you then saying, here's what I want? No, that's not what's happening.

Starting point is 01:40:11 Iran offered, he infused. It's like, it's almost through his own incompetence and stupidity. He keeps admitting that he's keeping it this way. So here, Brett Erickson reads, well, this is just for a squawk point in this, but there was an article, Axios, of course, citing U.S. officials. Well, well, that's fantastic. Roundabout solid. Approximately 60 million barrels of oil have passed through this.

Starting point is 01:40:40 straight. So the U.S. government who has a clear interest in lying about this goes to Axios, who continually lies for Israel and the United States about this very topic and has been caught doing it near consistently since the beginning and yells it out. Now, Brett, just being objective as he is, says, Axioteing anonymous officials claiming this, he goes, I can't even begin to tell you how skeptical I am. I agree with him. So he's just simply saying it just, he goes through how it just, it's not possible, right? 20 million barrels on a single day, maybe 60 million, 70, 72 hours? Get out of here. There's literally not enough vessels to conduct. the ship, I agree.

Starting point is 01:41:11 Like, I think it's crazy. They're just making these lies up. I simply just said, it's a lie. Cut and dry. You know, that's my opinion. That's what he said he laughed. He said concise. I like it.

Starting point is 01:41:22 Now, Will Schrever also point something out. Here's the actual article from Washington Post. Pentagon quietly adds dozens of tally of troops wounded amid Iran war. The fact that that's happening, I mean, in my mind, proves to us they're hiding casualties. What do you mean, quietly adds? Based on what? There hasn't been any recent massive. events. So that means you, at the very least, it was weeks ago and you waited and didn't even

Starting point is 01:41:46 wait. You didn't even tell anybody. You just quietly put numbers on a tally. Is that what they mean to you? Yes, guys, that is how little they mean to them. They are a number they try to hide. That is the life it means to you. The mothers and fathers and sons and daughters out there who believe in this agenda, they don't care about your life and family. You are a number they can ignore. That's what you are. And as he writes, for first it was Barry with Ned says, The Pentagon quietly adds this. He's the one that pointed this out. The tally increases.

Starting point is 01:42:19 And then Will simply says, sailors and Marines are typically found in warships. That's the type they're referencing. Somehow, 37 of them became casualties in recent weeks and have now been added to a butcher's bill. This strongly suggests that something rather serious occurred on one or more of the U.S. Navy warships, which does make sense, and they would hide this.

Starting point is 01:42:40 but we don't know because the U.S. government is lying to us about everything. Now, what you'll see interesting in the shift in the conversation, you might have seen this. Bratani simply is highlighting that it's interesting the way they're engaging with Arragachi here. Now, I thought this was pretty interesting. Oh, I'm remembering something right now that I think I'm... I'm not going to get it now. I think I was remembering somebody different in regard to Iran in a previous conversation. I'm confused the issue.

Starting point is 01:43:07 Anyway, back to this point, that he... is in front of the UN and the way that they are at the UN rather at like a post conference and the way they're clamoring to get him to answer questions and you can see by the way he's smiling this is not normal guys and now historically i've been pointed this out recently in the past there were examples where people were Iran was like withheld for being like they're a founding member of a UN and they weren't even allowed to come in and it was during the time when the US was lying about them and they weren't allowed to come in and give their side of the story which I laughed about at the time.

Starting point is 01:43:41 I said, that's insane. I believe that was under Trump's administration. So this time, I've thought that might happen again. They didn't. But what's interesting is what you normally get, not just to the U.N., but just anywhere, right, is you get them going to the U.S. interest, the U.K. interest, and you give us your side of the story.

Starting point is 01:43:56 They relay that side. What is Israel say? And they rarely even care what the Iranian side says. They may give it lip service, and they frame it in the side of the, you know, what he says is terrorism or whatever. I'm being kind of largely facetious, but that is generally what they do. They slant it in words and wait.

Starting point is 01:44:12 Okay, here is what you recently saw. Now, I don't, I'm not, don't have an equivalent clip of Trump, let's say not getting asked questions, right? But what you'll recognize is you're not getting the same interest. Because let's be real, guys, everybody knows that they're lying. So right now what you're getting is an interest in trying to find out what he has to say. And guys, that's new. This and the way it's done, it shifted. It's too close.

Starting point is 01:44:45 This is not what you normally get. Well, sorry, I can't hear you like this. Did the seven-day timeline start, sir? The seven-day timeline will start as soon as the United States accept this plan. Now, that all didn't happen because Trump refused it. What he was saying is that the seven-day timeline towards the eventual reopening of the straight would begin the moment they accepted it, which they did not. But it's just interesting.

Starting point is 01:45:13 I'm not suggesting there weren't moments in the past where they're being asked questions. But if you just have followed this, you'll recognize a kind of passive engagement with what they're doing and saying, sort of like it's not the relevant story, Iran claims versus, you know, the narrative of what the U.S. says or Israel, right? You've seen it. It's just, in my experience, that demonstrates quite a difference of interest in what he has to say. Now, that doesn't necessarily mean that they believe him or care about, but it shows you a shifting of the power dynamic. I believe that's what he was smiling about. And she's saying the similar thing.

Starting point is 01:45:46 It's fascinating. Now, on top of that, before we finish with the point of what the UN was doing and what they did at the UN's and finishing points, on the point of foreign policy, let's not forget. In addition to all this, as this country's struggling, as people are suffering, as prices are through the roof, you know, as we continue to watch how many wars Trump ends that don't ever end. You know, as yet again is, you know, the Ukraine war, all these different points where he says he's ended them, but now they're starting or even other ones that are kicking back up. He claimed he's ended. The point is long song, there's more coming. At least according to what they're suggesting,

Starting point is 01:46:20 Trump could be doing this to, you know, kind of put a stick in the spokes of the conversation. But according to CBS News, Trump is preparing to invade Cuba. Honestly, I kind of see how this would work for him. Not, I should say work for him, but might take the pressure off what's going on over here. That may sound crazy in the sense that it's another war,

Starting point is 01:46:38 but ultimately, this is something that both sides have been aiming at for a long time, you may get a weird surge from even with the inner circle by doing this, especially if you get some kind of a win. Either way, guys, they're floundering and this is insane because Americans don't want more war, do they? But it's not about us. It's never been about us. That's the important thing to remember.

Starting point is 01:46:59 It's about something much larger, which we'll get into more tomorrow. Now, talking about Netanyahu, and which I think is very important, will end with the point of October 7th being allowed to be discussed with where we're at in the world and what's happening with Iran, just as the focal point, Iran, but so many other examples, it still blows me away, and this was the shot I took for the screen for the show today, it still blows me away that this can be so undeniably documented, proven by their own statements, by endless facts, UN, human rights groups, people in their government, IDF members that have spoken out, I mean, about what they're doing and how real and obvious it is and how many times they've loved.

Starting point is 01:47:41 lied to us. And yet so this man can be an actual war criminal and just gets welcome to the United Nations to speak about his war crimes and to gaslight people everywhere. How do you not see a broken scenario with that being allowed? Now, if there was a war criminal that was a Palestinian, do you believe that would be allowed? What if it was in a number of other countries that weren't Israel? Do you think that would they probably be arrested on the spot? There's only one way to look at that. Now, you can read anything you want into that. I'm only saying one clear thing that Israel clearly is treated differently. You want to make it about Jewish people alone?

Starting point is 01:48:15 You'd be incorrect in what I'm saying. Either way, the point is obvious. Israel, on the record, is engaged with differently on a thousand different scales. And in this case, is one of them. So let's get into some of the lies. Many, many, many, many obvious lies. And here's one again.

Starting point is 01:48:29 It's only four seconds. But the fact that he even says this again, one of the most provable lies in the entire, I mean, it might, it really honestly in my entire time doing this, because of how much it's been, and debunked very early post October 7. Hmm.

Starting point is 01:48:48 That's interesting. Sitting here. That one works. I burned babies alive in front of their parents. See, I can't even go back. I don't know what's up with this platform. Well, you heard it, though. That was it.

Starting point is 01:49:05 I just tried to go back and let it replay and just didn't do it. Weird. Whatever. So the fact that he's actually still saying that. Now, just let's just just. quickly go through it since it's important for people that, you know, how dare you suggest that, well, the facts that we know didn't happen? For the zillionth time, David says, Netanyahu claims Palestinians burn babies alive in front of their parents. For the zillionth time, all Israeli media outlets

Starting point is 01:49:33 and fact-checking NGOs like the ones he lists silently support the blood libel that manufacturer consent for genocide or any number of other platforms. How many platforms did you see come out and break, you know, headline. Netanyahu lies, bombastic. at the UN. None. None. Guys, there's literally a Wikipedia page. It's not some knockoff it's with actual Wikipedia. Hamas baby beheading hoax. Think about how crazy it is that that would be called blood libel anti-Semitism like 30 seconds ago. And, you know, historically remember that you, in many cases, politically means they want to obfuscate something important and true. Similar reports accused Hamas of hanging or slitting the throats of babies and burning

Starting point is 01:50:18 others alive, including by stuffing at least one young child into a hot almond. It's false, guys. It's literally under the hope. We'll go even further than that because it's important to. You guys know all of this. This is the article that we were screaming about in the midst of this. This thing literally came out December 4th, 2023 on Horat's, the leading Israeli newspaper. The headline Hamas committed documented atrocities, but a few false stories feed the deniers.

Starting point is 01:50:43 Maybe that title is ridiculous, by the way. I could also argue that Hamas lied about plenty of stuff. point is that it's not a fair statement with what actually happened. That's not to suggest that Hamas is not capable of any number of things. It's just not what actually happened. Almost every major thing that we could point to happened because it was done either in response, that Israel bombed people that were leaving or they bombed houses where they were or any number of things. And this is, again, the fact that we have to even go over this, it's insane. It was, it was clear in the beginning and only got more clear by the evidence of the very people that they brought back,

Starting point is 01:51:15 assuming they didn't kill them in the process. Now, case you don't remember. Here is, this is the actual post from the Israeli government. It's still public. Tober 26, 2023,

Starting point is 01:51:27 eight burned babies and one beheaded baby. That's what they're claiming. So here's Heretz. The reports above was later quoted on social media often referenced as dozens of beheaded babies, though sometimes it was burnt babies,

Starting point is 01:51:41 hang babies, you know, because we can mix it up. Now, it says, last week is Shea Cohen, a journalist for the ultra-Orthodox website, Kakir Hashibat, interviewed the colonel above of the Israeli defense forces, Gaza Division.

Starting point is 01:51:57 Buskila talked about babies who had been hung on clothes lines, his remarks were cited by a host of Twitter personalities. That was this guy. You remember, we saw it, clearly was put to saying this. Cohen wrote that he was later informed that the story was inaccurate and deleted the post. Why would an army officer invent

Starting point is 01:52:15 such a horrifying story? I was wrong, he added. This story was false. Now, like, do we need to let that sink in any further? I don't know how much more. There are still people that will argue there's somehow a nuance here. There's not. They lied.

Starting point is 01:52:31 And literally lied, guys. And there's so many more examples in this. This guy was a central point of the lie. It wasn't an emotional mistake as they tried to reframe it after it was exposed. He lied to you. He knowingly made up these stories. He knowingly cried about false stories to convince you to accept a genocide. that's where we are and they still have that post up so he lied for everybody and he knows he's

Starting point is 01:52:59 lying that's what's so despicable and biden and trump have both repeated that lie like well past saying it after october seventh guys trump just said it again recently so in addition to that netanyahu got up and held a pager in this in the air because that's not crazy right to hold up an obvious terrorist attack let's see here's what we did and we bombed children and women for for our own agenda war criminal Benjamin Netanyahu holds up a pager during his UN speech highlighting one of the most sinister terrorist attacks in modern history. 42 men, women and children killed and over 4,000 injured over the course of two days in a Mossad orchestrated terror attack in Lebanon.

Starting point is 01:53:35 That's the one we played for you, where they go, we orchestrate things, we make fake companies, we affect the supply chain to our favor. They made these, they faked it. They went on for a decade. So they say. I make this point every time, but I shouldn't even need to. the idea that we can't as an honest individual individuals out there

Starting point is 01:53:53 acknowledge the fact that I don't care how what you think you were doing if you make a bomb and you put it into circulation for a year for a week and then pretend like you know where it's going to be you're lying and everybody knows you're lying guys this was a deliberate what's the term you know not targeted

Starting point is 01:54:13 this was a attack that was meant to hurt as many broad it was a broad overly They want to hurt innocent women and children. There's no way around it. They put it out there. They let it circulate and then they exploded these things well after the fact. Netanyahu is proud of it. This was on VK.

Starting point is 01:54:33 I saw it where we were posting the show. This is randomly posted today. Here's Netanyahu holding up a pager. And here are at least three examples. And there's more of innocent children who were permanently deformed for their life, for the rest of their life because of those pager attacks. Now, even if you want to try to pretend that somehow that that was a, Hesbola members' family.

Starting point is 01:54:54 So is Hesbola now automatically a terrorist? You know, I don't even want to go into. You shouldn't even give these people creedons and pretend like those arguments are justified. It's the equivalent of saying you can let bombs circulate throughout the United States. And if as long as it kills a CIA member's family, then it's a legal attack. Good luck trying to rationalize that. I don't even think we need to say that. The reality is anybody with a heart, with a soul, with brain cells, with computer,

Starting point is 01:55:19 with compassion, with integrity, already knows that nobody would accept this, unless it was that monster holding his pager in the air. Now, we'll include our show where we talk about Israel's infiltration of specifically U.S. tech in light of the Lebanon pager attack, which is terrifying. And it's only gotten more and more obvious as we've done follow-ups. This was 2024. Okay, here is Benjamin Netanyahu, casually threatening the explosion of the compound they're in. Now, of course, you could argue he just means that bad guys will attack.

Starting point is 01:55:50 Well, he's also on the record historically saying that they'll randomly attack the Twin Towers without any indication for why that would be the case, or listing off the statements of what later happened almost every time throughout history we can discuss in these conversations, that they'll target specific things with certain devices or, and every time. Here he is again. Sitting here in the General Assembly Hall of the UN, you know what one, one ton, just one, one ton, one ton ballistic missile would do? If it hit this place, it would obliterate the entire compound. Oh, you know. In fact, two such missiles would obliterate the UN. So you can imagine, so you can imagine. Does that look?

Starting point is 01:56:39 Obliterate the UN. Right there. That's who he is. Historically, it's very accurate. And we could talk about the 50 states one Israel, where he, I just went over this again. he's talking about their defense and then just casually sidesteps in. Do you have a cell phone? Well, you got a piece of Israel in your pocket.

Starting point is 01:57:02 And it goes back to talking about bombs. Now, you walk me through how that makes sense without understanding that he's literally threatening politicians that you will be attacked if you don't do what we want. Of course, you can decide. That's my opinion. But you tell me how that makes sense when they're openly discussing the idea of pagers and booby-trapped equipment in every pace in every country you can imagine. So you can imagine.

Starting point is 01:57:24 think about 1,000 gigantic missiles falling from the skies on your cities. Yeah, ask any of the civilians in Lebanon, any of the civilians in Gaza, any civilians in Syria, ask any civilians in any location where they've continually illegally bombed people to death. Yeah, they know. On your homes, I salute the courage of the people of Israel. I salute the courage of our brave soldiers. Okay, so Israel's great. That's what you came to the UN and said,

Starting point is 01:57:57 I support Israel's agenda. I mean, they, yeah, there's nothing but doubling down from these people, guys. And obviously, what are you going to do? Fine, you caught us. We're genociders. That's not going to happen. What matters is that somebody does something about this, holds them accountable, right? But the people in power at the UN, in the United States, in the UK are not those people.

Starting point is 01:58:21 Now, of course, what you'll see is him calling them moral cowards for the many, many, many people that got up and left. Now, here's an interesting point, though. So here I'm saying that as the UN, not every individual in every country in there, which is kind of a similar point, but the UN is an entity that is clearly not doing anything or even a lot, you know, it's obvious. I mean, I'm talking about allowing this criminal in the area. But what you can see is that, I mean, the majority will get up and leave. Well, I think this wouldn't count close to the majority.

Starting point is 01:58:53 And it shows you then that there's at least a willingness to display that you don't agree with what's happening. But why doesn't that translate into the actual outcome here? Because of the main elements, because of the U.S. and Israel, both having veto power over the things that might hold them accountable. That's why. Same goes for China and Russia. The idea that you have these five elements that can just always be there, no matter what they do, they never lose their influence. This is not a real entity. It's not real because of that. And arguably, I don't think we should want something like this in the long run. away from this in general. But here he is calling the moral cowards for leaving. I just want to

Starting point is 01:59:31 point out the thing is, you know, what interesting that you see all these countries getting up and leaving. I would argue it's largely the countries that are aware of what they're doing and also aren't influential enough at the UN to have a seat enough. Like, remember, we have 193. They, in a general assembly, there's influence there. But at the security council at the, I'm forgetting the other, shoot. Anyway, the other ones, there are, there. They're not all included in those votes. And I find that to be very relevant. My point is all them leaving might very well be people that would actually do something

Starting point is 02:00:04 about this. Should they be able to? It's hard to say. Or maybe they're taking a moment to gain something by making themselves look like they want to stop it and ultimately won't. Question it all. But your way, the world is turning. It has already, guys. It long since has.

Starting point is 02:00:17 The people to these countries, they all despise Israel. Because it's easy to despise a genocidal monster of a country, a government, that is choosing to murder innocent people and then telling you, that they're right in doing so. Not hard to see. Before I begin, just a quick announcement. If there are any other moral cowards who haven't yet left this hall, please do so now.

Starting point is 02:00:43 Thank you very much. You're not going to act like it doesn't care. I think it obviously bothers him. Now, here's what I thought was relevant to include with that, is which you're weirdly not getting a lot of reporting from the corporate media, which is shocking, right? Well, basically they went around and took a list. Got on the black list.

Starting point is 02:01:09 The Israeli move after abandoning the speech at the U.N. They went around and they wrote down every single group that got up. And then they wrote that it reported Israel accounts 77 countries absent from his speech. Full list inside. You'd think that they might have an issue with lists. You know what I mean? Like the idea of the way they would frame that. Like listing out a group of people.

Starting point is 02:01:29 people that you're going to call out. Like, isn't that something in the same way in reverse that's been framed as so insensitive or it's just such a constant hypocrisy? The idea being that you're going to do something. Now, like I said at the beginning, clearly, obviously, historically, this is what Israel has done. And I look into it for yourself. They will go at whether you could make it about political if you want, fine.

Starting point is 02:01:50 I think it's much more than that, but they have made it clear. They will do what they can to penalize these countries. They'll Trump will now all of a sudden have different trade, you know, tariffs. or, you know, financial attacks or sanctions or suddenly you're on the terrorist watch list because of this. Or in reverse, you can be the Sudan. And you can be whatever you want to.

Starting point is 02:02:09 Basically, as I've said before, you don't do anything different. They just go, we'll take you off the terrorist list if you normalize with Israel. So either you weren't terrorists or they don't care if you are. I mean, it's simple, guys. It's just weird. On top of that, laughably, delegations from the U.S. and Israel left the room

Starting point is 02:02:28 when Ronnie, delegation spoke. So you're also a hypocrite, which is not surprising, right? Moral cowards, well, you did the same thing. So you're a child, right? It's just clear what, you know, the 77 countries, probably more than that, God have been left when he was speaking, because the world sees them. Now, these petty U.S. and Israeli ones get up and stomp out. Nobody else did because they are in the minority here. Needs to be seen. They all, you also have this example of an Israeli ambassador. or, you know, what's his name? That guy's just a Mongol, you know,

Starting point is 02:03:00 I forget what his name is. You'll see him here. Point, he goes around and starts, multiple things. It's only one example, but goes around harassing people. He goes around trying to manipulate, you know, holding,

Starting point is 02:03:11 tries to bring a Starlink device to Iranian delegates. Like he's doing like propaganda moments in the UN. It's just, there's no decorum from these people. They don't care. And in this case, he got kicked out after he tried to stage a protest. Here's what he did.

Starting point is 02:03:26 Shame on you guys a only group of sticks in a ticket. Shame on you. Shame on you. Great. What is your ID? Good. The number is walking out. Shame on you.

Starting point is 02:03:51 You and me. It's on the table then. It's on the table. It's brilliant table. You'll get it in a second. What did you say? You know how in time they raise flags against Russia and Korea in here? So we'll need a tagging on.

Starting point is 02:04:22 Shame off your terrorists. Shame off your turrets. He literally got escorted out of the building. Now, of course, you could argue it's just because of a decorum, you know, violation because he was doing that. He was harassing people. It was like a third time. Either way, guys, I mean, how would you, I mean, I would have never expected that very recently. So I'm glad to see it.

Starting point is 02:04:52 I think they does, I think as an individual he deserves that. I think he's been constantly harassing people. He's, you know, goes up there and shreds. I mean, it's everything he does. It's bombastic. He's lying. He's constantly. yelling about what they're doing is justified. Well, everybody knows they're murdering innocent people.

Starting point is 02:05:06 You know, it's wrong, guys. They are, they, this deserves to happen. Now, let's show you why, case you were confused. Israel exposed. Shame on Western journalism for forcing us to do the work they are too afraid to do. I mean, this kind of stuff just can't be ignored, guys. One location, just Rafa itself, just looking at this. Look at this. And this is not, this is tell all Sultan Rafa, 26. Here's 2022. Look at the buildings. Look at the civilization.

Starting point is 02:05:38 And even that, guys, is within an area that is being suppressed and controlled. And it's an open-air prison. That's what Gaza is. Look at that. It's flat. That's what they meant by Amalek. This is what they did on purpose. Guys, they went around with bulldozers and took these things down.

Starting point is 02:05:55 They literally flattened the area. For those trying to pretend like it's not a genocide, you couldn't find a more obvious genocide. They literally tried to just erase them from existence. Here's another one. Rafa 2020, Rafa 2026. Multiple.

Starting point is 02:06:13 There's another location in Rafa 2020. Now it's literally gone. It's just, it's deliberate, targeted, focused genocide. It's disgusting. And it's just everywhere you look. Here,

Starting point is 02:06:33 Ali Abunamah, electronic intifada, Google Maps, Google Maps. has now updated to show Zionist Holocaust Gaza. Now ask yourself, why? Weren't they the ones that we're trying to hide it? Wasn't it fuzzed out so we couldn't see? Well, guess what, guys?

Starting point is 02:06:51 Things are shifting. Now, I'm not saying that means Google's on your side. Far from it. What it means is that they're all recognizing that they can't keep doing this forever. The world is turned. We see what the Zionists are, and there's no going back.

Starting point is 02:07:03 Now, I argue it's going to change into something different where they try to, you know, Zionism itself tries to prolong itself by changing what it is, what it looks like, what it calls itself, whatever. That's probably where it goes. You know,

Starting point is 02:07:15 al-Qaeda becomes high-trial sham. You know, same thing. But just, there's no denying what you're looking at. This is another one. Mosab Abu Toa points out an Israeli telegram channel is posting a new image because they get access to it because they're there laughing about it,

Starting point is 02:07:29 stealing from places on the ground. Here's Kahn Yunus, you know, the safe location in the beginning. Remember that? Just gone. It's bombed out. Here is a rabbi, an Israeli rabbi, openly, and I check this myself, this is exactly what he's saying, calling for the extermination of every Palestinian Gaza. He literally said directly quoting, do not spare any soul.

Starting point is 02:07:53 This was 2024. March 9, 2024, do not spare any soul. That, ladies and gentlemen, is not a man of God. I don't care if you're a Christian, a Jew, a Muslim, a man of God does not go kill everybody. children, women killed them all. Praise God. That's not what you do. Guys, I don't care.

Starting point is 02:08:11 If that is the God you pray to, then that is not the God that the rest of us pray to. And I mean that in a general sense. Like, you know, I don't get into the religious side of it, but, you know, the larger point of this. You know, it's funny. I remember thinking about this when I was a kid, even like very, very young, wondering, it's like, it's interesting. And like, isn't it possible that all these different interpretations of what God is or just different locations, interpretation of the same event that they experienced?

Starting point is 02:08:33 It's like, as a kid, I thought about that. It's just funny. It's weird the way people are so tribal and, you know, dogmatic. Either way, my point is, I don't care if this was a Christian pastor. Nobody. I don't care. Anybody that claims they're a religion of peace, any of them. And then goes on to do that, any of them, a pastor, a Christian, they are not something,

Starting point is 02:08:55 they're not a person of God, they're not. And I've seen that from any of them. I'm Muslim out there saying it's okay to murder people. You can compare that to the majority of Muslims in the, this country, anywhere in the world, and you can recognize the lie, despite what people might tell you. You can be gaslit by people all over the play. Same with Judaism. Same with Christianity. Again, all three, despite what people might lie to you about. Disgusting. BBC, Israel admits mistakes over medic killings and Gaza. Not a joke. That was April 6,

Starting point is 02:09:25 2025. We've talked about this. Admits mistakes. Daniel Lambert, mistakes. Equal. They lied to the world until video evidence was found. which is what happened. The video, medics being executed from eight meters away and then buried with their ambulances. That's the truth. It's literally documented. Mistakes. Oops.

Starting point is 02:09:49 We accidentally murdered you. Here's another example of how this is happening and just a gross, like all-encompassing. I don't even know what you would call this. Like how you could even do something like this. The Atlantic, or excuse me, the athletic. Houston Texans line. backer, Aziz al-Shir, was told by an NFL official to remove the name of Wafa Akila, an eight-year-old Palestinian girl killed in Gaza.

Starting point is 02:10:16 It was on his, what are they called? It says right here, eye black, whatever, the stuff underneath your eyes. He simply wrote the girl's name on there. He was told he had to take it off or he would not be able to play. I don't even understand how you rationalize that. So because you care about a girl being murdered in Gaza, you support terrorism or what? are we talking about? You know, this is a political wall.

Starting point is 02:10:43 As Mel says, in the NFL, you can protest America all day long, but if you pay the slightest homage to one of thousands of little girls murdered by Israel, they'll fine you $10,000. And if you say you don't care, I'll pay the fine and bring attention to another little girl killed by Israel, they'll stop you from playing altogether, which is what he did. How in the world do you, I mean, that's a systematic, a systemic problem. on top of that israel central elections committee you know because they keep telling us how it's free there's freedom for muslims and is this not by the way they lie and it's easy to prove well on top of that because they have their their their parts of the government where they give some like a token element of influence but then just completely ignore well at this point israel central elections committee has voted to bar the country's two main arab political majority political lists from next month's election potentially leaving Palestinian citizens of israel without represent yeah right like they've already being represented they're literally just proved to you that it was a farce to begin with. We're just going to go, you guys can't be involved in the election.

Starting point is 02:11:44 As Dennis Girl points, the only democracy in the Middle East has banned the two main Arab political parties. How much you want to bet you don't hear a peep from the Western democracies as if that's what they actually are. On top of that, Lebanon, yeah, they're still doing that. This is from the 25th white phosphorus. I want, in case you're confused, note that it's clearly in the middle of the day, or at least in the daytime.

Starting point is 02:12:07 It's not dark, which is the only logical, it's not logical, but the only reason they're able to pretend it's not a war crime. It's signaling. Nope, they're using it in the day. And it's on civilian locations. These are objective war crimes. And like I need to bring it up every time, but I'll just grab one of them. Israel used white phosphorus in Gaza and Lebanon, October 12th, days after October 7th. Yep, openly using white phosphorus over civilians right in the beginning.

Starting point is 02:12:38 No surprise. Assal Rob, if you only follow Western media, you'd likely have no idea this is happening. This is from the 25th. They tend to ignore the fact that Israel is destroying southern Lebanon, piece by piece. Israeli air strikes happening now across southern Lebanon right up until this day. Civilian locations. Orchards. Boy, you know, that's just what they're doing.

Starting point is 02:13:03 It's targeted ethnic cleansing. Now, of course, if you protest any of those things, well, you'll be arrested. Jewish actress Hannah Einbinder arrested at a pro-Palestine protest. I mean, I think it was her name. I forget her name. Very famous. Red hair. She got arrested to.

Starting point is 02:13:24 I mean, it's not about supporting, you know, the Democrat actress or whatever the dumb thing partisans think do to people to, you know, what it does to people's minds. It's about recognizing that somebody's out there protesting, whatever you think their intentions are saying Israel's genocide has to stop. and you get arrested in a country that claims you have free speech and the genocide committer who's on the world stage as a war criminal, according to the international community, is totally okay to speak.

Starting point is 02:13:52 There's no confusing how clear that is. She has faced more consequences for protesting a genocide than Benjamin has for committing one, he says. Well, you remember this guy from Princess Bride? I forget his name, actually. It's Wallace Sean. You might be surprised about what he says. says here. He has something to say about Israel as a Jewish actor. The Israelis invaded somebody else's territory. They took people's homes and they did many of the things that

Starting point is 02:14:30 the Nazis did to the Jews and they're doing now they're really doing. You can't be more evil than than what they're doing. They are doing evil that is just as great as what the Nazis did. And in some ways, it's worse because I don't have boasts about it. Right. Hitler had the decency to try to keep it secret. Now they're really doing. You can't be more evil than what they're doing. They are doing evil.

Starting point is 02:15:07 that is just as great as what the Nazis did. And in some ways, it's worse because I don't have boasts about it. Right. Hitler had the decency to try to keep it secret. Right. For some reason, for some reason, Hitler didn't want people to know he was doing these things to the Jews. It was a secret. The Israelis are almost surprised.

Starting point is 02:15:37 out of it and don't keep it a secret and it's demonically evil. That would be inconceivable. Inconceivable. Inconceivable. Inconceivable. You keep his in the heart. I don't think of me as what you think of me. Just had to play that.

Starting point is 02:15:57 But think about how important that is, you know, what he's doing. He's, I guarantee, I guarantee you he's being attacked for that. You know, and they're going to go after him, you know, he's going to go after him. you know, Hitler had the, the, whatever the word he used, you know, as if he's clearly trying to make a point by saying that. And by the way, not that I should, you know, look, not that it matters to do it now, but I've shown you at least two videos of Israeli Jewish women, telling, walking by Orthodox Jews who are protesting Zionism and saying Hitler made a mistake, or rather, Hitler made only one mistake, he should have taken you out or something like that. I've played the

Starting point is 02:16:31 clothes for you. I mean, how do you even make sense of that from what we're told about this history? These are real Zionists to go back to the origin point, in my opinion, that understand very well on the record that there was an allegiance between the two. But again, not even to go into this stuff, like the historical evidence from Horat's, written about the agreement made. Since you bring it up, for crying out loud, hold on. It was, oh, now I'm going to forget. Oh, I think it was his tweet that I grab it from.

Starting point is 02:17:02 Yeah, right here. Here's the actual Horat's article. Zionist, Bolisha's efforts to recruit Nazis and the, fight against British are revealed. Now, it outlines this very clearly, as his tweet points out, that the Lehi continued to seek ally with Nazi Germany even after the final solution began. That's Dan's post. And this is the Lehiye, that's the founding elements of Zionism, one of them. I just, I continue to find that insane. So pointing out the reality that what Israel's doing today, it mean, comparatively look at what we're talking about. I mean, it's hard to know.

Starting point is 02:17:41 in regard to the different, because right now, because of the internet, because of all the different tools, the insight on this is insane. That's why it's so impossible to ignore. Who is to say, you know, what, how much more would have been seen or whatever else, or maybe how much more we would have found out wasn't entirely what happened. At the end of the day, you can't deny what we're watching. It is the worst live stream genocide in history. Here, Orson Otrowski back in 2024, the Keefe has become today's version of the KKK hood. How stupid that is. And I simply wanted to point this out.

Starting point is 02:18:13 Here is a Holocaust survivor specifically pointing to the protests at Columbia and saying, you're doing what's right. So realize if this Holocaust survivor, who is what they pretend they're fighting for, is telling you the people of Columbia were fighting for the right thing, then explain, you know, then think about what would be the wrong thing, you know, what the Israeli government is doing, pretending to fight for Jews in the world. A Holocaust survivor, my message to the brave student, protesters in America is just keep doing it, don't give up, we are doing exactly the same,

Starting point is 02:18:46 and in the long term we are going to prevail. I'm out from the beginning at every March. A small group of survivors and descendants of survivors demonstrate disagreement with the use of the Holocaust experience as a cover by the Zionists and the state of Israel. I mean, just that alone. You know, his acknowledgement that he's talking about Zionist and the idea, it's just, it's obvious. Because somebody who actually understands that can see the same things. Now, you can watch the rest of it. It's important just to see that that, as you guys know, we've covered that before.

Starting point is 02:19:23 He actually followed up with a post in Horat's. I've been engaged in researching the Holocaust for about 40 years. I never imagine my worst nightmare is that the Jewish state would bomb starving children to death. And here's another post of him saying the same thing. He says, the genocide, we are with. witnessing today is something that I recognize from my own experience as a Holocaust survivor. What is happening today in Gaza is an extreme form of repeat genocide. A Holocaust in our own time in front of our eyes, Stephen Capos. That's the Holocaust survivor. Oh, and I'll include these.

Starting point is 02:19:57 Maybe I'll play that on the way out. I haven't played a long time. But just the ongoing, I had to re-like this yet again, by the way. I point that at every time. It removes all the likes from these things so people can't find them. But the ongoing long, long, long thread of all the doctors you've spoken up telling you, you know, many, many, many of them. How many, many of them? How many doctors returning from Gaza telling you that Israel's deliberately targeting children? Do we need to see? Apparently one more. It's all there. Now, in case you didn't see this, I simply wrote this as I sometimes do to make a point for people. An American walking down a U.S. Street was surrounded and harassed by a mob waving Palestinian flags, chanting allegiance to a foreign

Starting point is 02:20:34 country. How can we allow this, right? How often we hear this? And usually you just have people on like a public march, not breaking any laws, as in many cases, Americans who are either supporting Palestinian or have health and heritage or walking down the street going, we, you know, have every right to do that like you were with any other flag or any other agenda, because, you know, freedom we tell ourselves, right? But of course, when it's Palestinians and I'll say, oh, my God, we've had overtaken. Okay, well, then I simply, I read that out. Oh, wait, I'm sorry, it's actually Israelis with Israeli flags, harassing an American so we can pretend it never happened, which is what we get. you're not going to see the Elon Musk's and the rest out there going,

Starting point is 02:21:09 oh my God, they're waving power foreign flags. So at the end of the day, what you're going to get from this is an American woman who has a shirt on that says Israel killed's children. And they all just mob around her, wading their flags, chanting Israel, chai and whatever else they're saying. And just, you know, it's not like a big violent thing. But at the end of the day, if this was a white woman with a bunch of people, Palestinian flags, what do you think all the usual suspects would be doing?

Starting point is 02:21:34 And you know, you know. Now, it should matter one way or the other. Do we have an issue with foreigners where we're rather just people supporting a foreign country and waving that flag? Or do we acknowledge that's a free right they have to do what they want? You know, the latter should be the obvious

Starting point is 02:21:49 for people pretending they believe in freedom and the riots and so on. My point is clearly one group out there does not believe that. Only when it pertains to, or rather they only believe it when it pertains to one group. It's not an American group. On top of that, for all we're discussing,

Starting point is 02:22:04 I think it's worth pointing this out because even this is now being pointed out by Twitter this is Johnny Gass pointing out multiple examples of this, but I'll just show you the actual post that's still there. This person says, to the loser schmuck at Solomon Friedman, I'm not familiar, to the loser schmuck who yelled F Jews at me while driving past my synagogue, I got your license plate.

Starting point is 02:22:24 And yes, I'll be getting your name. It's almost as if it's meant to align with like the flock thing. I don't know. We aren't taking crap laying down anymore. Well, guess what? This exact same tweet was posted word for word by countless people on this platform. this is an engagement paid. And as he points out, yep, you can see it all over.

Starting point is 02:22:42 Many of them prominent accounts, guys. Oh, this one even says paid partnership. And look, they all see the exact same thing, different accounts. None of them pretending to be sharing somebody's story. Now that I want to stress as always. That does not in any way mean that there's no such event as possible, or that in the past that Jewish people haven't been attacked. You could Jewish, Christian, Muslim, anybody.

Starting point is 02:23:04 You could show examples across the board of any of them being attacked or targeted. The idea is pretending there's some kind of an overwhelming focus. Now, what's interesting is because of what Zionism is doing, I argue that's what they're literally driving into existence. I don't think it's working, but that's how it used to work where, I mean, it is to some degree, is people then take the bait and think the Jews are creating all this when what you're seeing is Zionism creating it. So you blame it on that. But either way, take it for whatever you will. The bottom line is faking this.

Starting point is 02:23:34 pretending that there's some kind of an ongoing attack when there's not. Now, again, that doesn't mean there's not attacks that happen. It means that these people are choosing to fake it, which will mean two things, either they don't have examples to point to or want to make it so prevalent with fake information that you believe there's something that there's not. Here's an example, Zachary points to that I've, I mean, look up articles like this. You will find an endless string of articles that use different examples that demonstrate the prevalence of this happening specifically to support Israel's agenda.

Starting point is 02:24:04 This is Sean Samet, a former employee at the Temple Cole Ami Synagogue, 2020 claimed man shouted anti-Semitic comments and stabbed him in the synagogue. Turns out he lied. Yeah, surprising, right? Here's the Fox article. Man's Apple Watch proves he lied about the stabbing. He literally stabbed himself. It's not, it's a very public story.

Starting point is 02:24:25 Basically what happened was they analyzed his watch. They found that his heart rate was actually high before the event and not during the event. by the way, a totally obvious example, even for dishonest people, why these things are not in your interest. But it says investigators say it was basically led to police to the synagogue where they found bloody tissues and the knife where he stabbed himself. Now, does that mean that every Jewish person?

Starting point is 02:24:48 No. Does that mean every Zionist even? No. Does that mean every event you hear of is fake? No. Should you assume that? No. But what it means is there's an obvious agenda being driven by the Israeli propaganda to create this sentiment. And even from some people who believe that it's real, and they have to lie to bring attention to it. Either way, guys, it's dishonest and it's manipulative.

Starting point is 02:25:08 And Alan McLeod says a reminder that leaked Israeli studies found because they studied you that pushing pro-Israel propaganda to you in the West didn't work. We know because we see through it. Instead, they advised spending millions blasting the West with racist Islamophobic content, demonizing Muslims, Laura Lumer, and all the rest. look at this post, which is real. A woman reading the Quran with a baby with an AK in her stomach.

Starting point is 02:25:41 Do you agree or not, it says? Rob Christian. Insane, guys. And so what they realized is, well, we can't convince them that we're not monsters. So what we're going to do is convince them that Muslims are worse. And it didn't really work, I think, for people that are aware of Israel and what they're doing. But what it did is aggressively, like, just twist the mind. of people who already were worried about because of, you know,

Starting point is 02:26:06 war on terror and Muslim invaders and the whole game, by the way, which is quite literally created by the people we're talking about. The origin of propaganda, the origin of a Muslim terrorism or the suicide best, plenty of them. Certainly the Zionists have used it and brought it, in fact, to the area. Terrorism, as we know it today, the planting of bombs and marketplaces and so on and so forth, was in fact introduced into the Middle East by the Zionists in the 20s.

Starting point is 02:26:29 But the net result of Zionist terrorism and violence in the in the first third of the 20th century has brought forth to my mind the anomaly the horrific and unacceptable status in the Middle East today of the state of Israel which is in fact an armed garrison state which now exports more arms and distributes violence all around the world vastly disproportionate to its size I mean in that in that in that in that the reality I always It's weird how that does that. Only for me, apparently. You know, the undeniable reality of the history of what drives this

Starting point is 02:27:07 and how they've created, like literally open studies, or the funding you can see, or Brad Pascal and the, or, you know, arming the AI bots to lie to you about, it's all on the surface. We can literally see what they're doing. That's how desperate they are. They're losing. And in this case, guys, they have enough people that are convinced somehow that the only villain are the ones that are being oppressed by Israel.

Starting point is 02:27:28 The world is insane. Now, that doesn't mean that there aren't Muslims that are extreme or that people that can commit violence who are Muslims. It's obvious in any category. It just, you have to understand that what they do is create the other, the other, to dehumanize of the group they want you to go after. So if you think there's one group, that's the problem, you're being played. Now, I mean that in a general sense.

Starting point is 02:27:49 In any circumstance, you might find a single culprit. But the idea that like all the woes of our world go back to the, it's just, you're falling for the most obvious trap in the world. be more objective because you'll find the villain the problem it'll be scattered amongst everything you'll find people in every category that are working against you or and you'll find plenty of good people in every category that might align with your values whether they have the same religion or political side it's the game they play to keep you thinking that you're all you know that because you voted for one person that you're the same person or that you because you believe that system's

Starting point is 02:28:22 on your side somehow whatever it is but overall it's changing and even they have to evolve to this. So what you have now, even on the Atlantic, Egypt's top spy flew to Israel before October 7th with a dire warning. Oh, bombshell! You mean what we all literally knew,

Starting point is 02:28:42 like right after October 7th? And Shiae O'Ben Ephraim says, at this point, it would be easier to list the people who didn't warn Netanyahu. I mean, it's actually, so it's like the alleged, uh, was it the, uh, origin, point for COVID. Like, come on. Like, we went through this stuff right in the beginning. And it pretty clearly discerned early on that that wasn't the full story. And then they come back

Starting point is 02:29:05 around way after the fact and go, oh, looks like it's clearly this was a coordinated flow or the mass conversation that they died on the hill until suddenly at the exact same day on two different channels. Gottlieb and we, Lena Wend, admit to you they don't work. I mean, guys, these things are clearly coordinated. Why they're suddenly going, oh, yep, he knew. It's because they've lost. Israel has lost. And so these people are hedging their bets or whatever you want to call it. Or maybe there's a bigger narrative this is working towards. Maybe there's a part of Zion that they want to save and they're going to make Netanyahu the fall guy.

Starting point is 02:29:38 I don't know. But just recognize that you knew this, not because, I mean, we want, you know, if you watch this show because you reported, if you looked into it yourself, but you knew this because the evidence was there right then. And they've been gaslighting you about it this entire time. The same woman that sits there and goes, we have this breaking story was the same one that was willing to lie to. to you 30 seconds ago. Ask yourself why. Daniel Lambert. This is Trip Gabriel saying New York Times confirms Horat's report that Netanyahu was secretly warned. Good thing New York Times decided to finally say the thing we all knew. Who cares what New York Times is to say? If all they're doing is going, the thing you said. Therefore, now now it's real because we said, F off. You don't deserve

Starting point is 02:30:20 to be. If you're only following around admitting the thing, like it's a controlled flow. It just bothers me that this is how that works, right? That now it matters for the inner circle because New York Times said it. The evidence was already there. And even then, they're simply going, Herretz was right. Well, we knew that already. What did you do to confirm that? Did you do any more investigation?

Starting point is 02:30:39 I bet you if you read all the way through this, you'll find nothing more than we asked certain people in the U.S. said and Israel and Israel and the evidence was there. And it's not just because the Emirati president said so. That's the most basic flimsy part of the story. He said so because the evidence. was ridiculous before that, the days after that, the right before evidence of people in their own military going, we see it, do something. And they were threatened with jail time if they continue to speak up. All in the record. The warning was not shared with Israeli security chiefs. Lies. They're lying, guys. So this is a carefully coordinated effort to try to shift the narrative.

Starting point is 02:31:21 But you see, what you do is you accept the one thing that we know we can see. Well, he was war. We knew they knew. And that's out, right? So they take that point. They admit it, but then they bury it in other BS. Yes, they told them. We already know they knew. It's been discussed. There's multiple elements within their military that have spoken out. IDF members, people in the government. There's a panel where IDF members were screaming about how angry they were that they knew. Yeah, but yes, New York Times will tell you that we found out. It's just, it's just painful. And then you got Blasio going on Sean Hannity. And saying 3,000 or more.

Starting point is 02:31:58 DeBosio says Netanyahu was responsible for the protection of those people and he failed. He was warned and he ignored it. Why? Because New York Times said. Now these, what do you would call? I mean, it's almost like maybe they really are just this childish and stupid. They just go, well, the thing said, now I'm going to say because that's what it said. Do you know?

Starting point is 02:32:17 Did you care? Did you do your due diligence? Did you research this? Did you know it's been clear since, you know, nope, probably not. Nablasio just repeated what New York Times said because they're all a bunch of following jackals. And Hannity goes, that's propaganda. Nope, it's not. It's very easily proven. It's just kind of sad, isn't it? These are the people who are supposed to respect. Tinfoil hat girl says this was known weeks after October 7. Why is it okay to talk about now?

Starting point is 02:32:41 I think, I think my opinion is probably accurate that it's, they've lost, they're failing. We all see through it. And so this is an effort to try to stave that off. It's a release valve. But as tinfoil hat girl would consider like we all, like this community would, maybe there's more of the story. But guys, it's just kind of, it's embarrassing, right? Like, as we talk about with the foreign policy experts that are just experts on the lies, we tell ourselves about foreign policy, you know, it's, you wonder, do they even know that? Are we living through this, like dying part of the empire where the people that are, like,

Starting point is 02:33:13 people that have been lied to by the narrative are now the ones running the narrative and they don't realize that they're continuing the lies that they bought from the people that set the lies to begin? You know, it's what it feels like. You wonder if these are all like the autopilot sophomores that you don't even realize that what they're doing is just going through the motions? I don't know. But what I can tell you for sure is that Blasio and Hannity and all the rest, Glenn Bet, these people are not to be respected. They don't are kind of laughable in what they do.

Starting point is 02:33:41 They're all a bunch of subjective and partisan manipulators. Now, I'm not saying they know that. And I'm saying that's my opinion. But will you watch their, they will pull punches and they will lie and they'll blindly repeat the new thing that's improve because they're all part of it. And I just mean of the system, right? And that doesn't mean everybody's dishonest. It just means that people will go along to get along with the way this system works. You knew this a long time ago because a lot of us were reporting this in 2024. The undeniable reality of October 7th, foreknowledge, and the Hannibal directive, which they're not

Starting point is 02:34:14 talking about. Did you notice that? Clear. Now, you go through this and all the source material that we always include. These are not my opinions. They're not some secret document that we found than a 4chan post. These are provable evidence or data points, evidence points of the Israeli government admitting this, of people inside, admitting they were warned, of people in the IDF saying they warned their commanders,

Starting point is 02:34:36 of people, I mean, all of it. It's all there. And this was back in 2024. It's only gotten more since then. So, as always, I think this is undeniable. I think what you can see through this

Starting point is 02:34:46 is a very coordinated, like, I mean dishonesty, but it coordinated sort of transition through all of that using this. Now, what's interesting is while that's happening, what I think Trump and Israel are doing on the side of it is almost kind of sabotaging this, unless the plan is to collapse all this for that change.

Starting point is 02:35:05 You can see how both might make sense. The reason I'm saying that it might be sabotaging it is just because it seems to be, maybe it's just that they're being seen for doing it. But you get what I'm saying. It doesn't feel like us acknowledging this and the system fluctuating around that doesn't seem like it's supposed to happen that way.

Starting point is 02:35:20 But as always, we'll follow up on this. we'll tell you what we see in it. And hopefully you guys can use the information we're discussing to help others see the bigger picture. But I'll leave it for today, guys. And I'll be giving you some more updates soon. I don't want to get into it today, but it's, you know, I'm probably going back to California pretty soon.

Starting point is 02:35:39 And it's not going well. I'm not going to get into it today in general, probably even. But I mean, I have a lot of doubts about a lot of what they're doing and what they're trying to drive this into. But I'm just pretty worried about where, that goes and my belief in what they're trying to suggest is the answer. And I'm only saying all of this guys because, you know, I know this is, again, thank you for your patience with everything. Thank you for believing in what we do and supporting this platform because, I mean,

Starting point is 02:36:04 honestly, I need it more than ever, but it's, it's, I shouldn't, it should be about the work, you know, and we will get back at some point to some level of consistency. It's just very difficult. I'm sure, you know, to manage this with everything that's going on. But, you know, like I've been doing my best to make sure we get something going continually and that's that's you know it's just difficult with everything going on with how that goes forward and it's you know i know you guys know a lot of you live through certain things that i can't even imagine you know so i just appreciate you all and continue to supporting anybody out there that's bringing you objective nonpartisan information i love you all as always question everything come to your own conclusions stay vigilant did they buy it from or i think

Starting point is 02:36:48 they were buying it from. We have an incredible array of possibilities of creating foreign companies that have no way being traced back to Israel, shell companies over shell companies who affect the supply chain to our favor. We create a pretend world. We are a global production company. We write the screenplay. We're the directors.

Starting point is 02:37:12 We're the producers. We're the main actors. The world is our stage. Did you see any surprises in Gaza? Surprises. Yeah. Like the intelligence surprises. Pages, walkie talkers. Do you know how many equipment, I mean treated equipment do we have in these countries? You can't, you know, I do. You mean, you mean booby trapped equipment? Not only booby trapped and spying. Manipulated equipment. All right. In which countries you're talking about? All the countries that you can imagine.

The Last American Vagabond - Trump Rejects Peace (Again), Alleged "Terror Plot" On US Base In UK & MSM Admits Oct 7 Foreknowledge

There aren't comments yet for this episode. Click on any sentence in the transcript to leave a comment.