The Last American Vagabond - Trump's Blockade: Another Bluster Or The Real Agenda?

Starting point is 00:00:00 It starts with a simple question and ends in objective reality. Reality. Through our journey from there to here, we find one another and ourselves. And as the next 24 hours breaks free from our last, we gaze onward in reflection of the day. Tell your own. You're only, push on your own. Welcome to the daily wrap up. Monday, April 13th, 2026.

Starting point is 00:00:42 Thank you for joining me today. Definitely going to be a shorter show today. Well, you know, T-Lav short. I have the Corbett interview I'd planned that we had some miscommunication on. It will be taking place after this show. But I wanted to get on, and as I tend to do with these later interviews because of the time difference, I want to keep my mind sharp and I want to be engaged. So I kind of try to do a little bit before.

Starting point is 00:01:01 beforehand. But I decided I wanted to jump on today to discuss the blockade and updates around that that we were discussing yesterday and a few important points, one of which I'll tell you right in the beginning that it turns out according to U.S. information as well as pretty broad reporting at this point, which we should never take anything in face value, question at all, check for yourself, that it appears the ships that they alleged went through the straight during the 11th when they were supposedly, you know, when they were negotiating. If you understand what I mean, they were acting in bad fate that you haven't been falling along in front. from the U.S. side of it, it appears that didn't actually happen.

Starting point is 00:01:34 The ships that went through, or were about to, were threatened as we discussed, and the media reported that they went through and they controlled a straight. It turns out they turned back because they were threatened, or at least that's the broad reporting I can see and what the evidence backs up. But it just, the reason I'm starting with this is because it's, everything is dishonest about this. And as usual, our governments lie to us about pretty much everything. And it's not unique left or right, Trump Biden, to be lied to by our government.

Starting point is 00:02:00 But in this moment, it seems there's something else going on behind just more than just dishonesty. Right. And that's the point that gets into this potential larger agenda that I'm planning to talk a bit with Corbett tonight, which I'll make some points on today as well. And less, really just trying to go through as quick as possible today to make sure that we get this out there, but also that we, you know, keep this in our minds, questioning where this really goes and what's really driving this. And as always, even if it really is the agenda, even if this plan about the reorganization of the way the global, system works in regard to the Strait of Hormuz and, you know, guiding that through his actions, that may well have been the what that was ultimately planned and it might not even be Trump that's

Starting point is 00:02:39 aware of that. Maybe he's being played on top of the fact that if that even is the plan, that doesn't mean that's what people should be supporting because that's a chaotic reality. That's going to hurt American interests. That's going to hurt Americans. It'll sure as hell help the American oligarchy, but that's not the same as American interests. Now, today in large part is going to be the focal on the strait. I want to start with a point that I think relates to this that I keep mentioning, and some of it's the partisan stuff I was pointing out. But I really, I think it's relevant to see the kind of deflection aspects of the partisan game.

Starting point is 00:03:12 And it's really interesting in counterbalance to how big this story is. And we'll go through the evolution of that very quickly if I can. But I want to start with the actually start with the quick point to show you this shift that's already happened. Just in so many days we've been talking about this possible idea and we've seeing it bubble up, it's already been, it's been, as I wrote, and I'll show you in a minute, grabbed on to do like a life raft in the middle of the ocean by these people that are like, yes, that, I'll take that. That's the thing that Trump's doing because it all comes together

Starting point is 00:03:39 and it makes sense and he's them. It's a masterclass. Everyone seems to be calling it that in the partisan team, team support partisan game, at least on the one supporting it. But showing you that this is not really aligned with what they told you he was doing or what they were promised or, you know, it just, I think it's a, by the people, let's put it this way, the people who are partisans who, whether team sport or not, you know, believe in Trump and want this to happen, who are now supporting this, I have either decided that it doesn't matter what you get as long as Trump wins or somehow have converted, contorted everything from less government, no spending, all the end, to somehow everything of the opposite because of narrative they filled in afterward.

Starting point is 00:04:16 It's just, but this is my point about why I think most people, because I believe most are, you know, honest insofar as most people can be. And I mean that because everyone lies and has dishonesty in your lives, but generally on honest people are most of us out there who generally want the things they were promised, whether we disagree on that or not. And those people have not been given what they were promised, right? It's pretty obvious, even paying attention. And so at some point, you have to go, well, why would those people just keep standing with

Starting point is 00:04:42 the team? Some of them do. Most of them are not right now, as we were telling you way back in January, because I thought it was obvious then. And we're going to go over the evolution of the global shift, I guess, around the Strait of Vermusen his actions and where that leads to kind of of where it ends up. Where, you know, the main point is the title today?

Starting point is 00:05:00 Is this bluster? Is this yet another lie? And that's not, it's interesting, as always, the reporting comes out, whether it's the ships through the strait or the ceasefire deals going well or whatever the 30 million lies we've heard just in the last so many weeks, largely through baroquee, and axios that everyone parrots. You get this push of the narrative, the whole media apparatus. And the new media who all parrot the same thing.

Starting point is 00:05:24 Funny enough, even though they're fighting each other, but they're not really. And then the story comes out a couple days later and it turns out, oh, that wasn't even accurate. And it gets buried again by the new lie. And it's like this cycle. And so it's really interesting that now with this blockade element that's happening today, we should be wondering right now whether this is even happening. And there's heavy, clearly I'll go over the Straner Formoose tracker and so on and talk about what we can see. But it's weird how quickly the people, even people that can see that they keep getting caught lying,

Starting point is 00:05:51 just kind of go with the flow of the current momentum of the media. It's just weird to me. And I think right now, so the question should be, are there, is there even really a blockade in effect? There are ships there like there were before. They were U.S. tankers or rather, you know, wartime ships that were there before this. There's a couple more now today I'll point to specifically in the straight. But what's the actual blockade? China says, screw you, we're going to go through.

Starting point is 00:06:13 And I believe that's what's going to happen. India is getting passage from Iran. And Iran saying, if you do anything, we're going to fire on your ships. And so I believe it's all a bunch of narrative. And what do you get from the typical people? The straight, you know, the blockade is in effect and they're winning. shut down everything and Iran is screaming in terror. It's like that's not even close to what's actually happening.

Starting point is 00:06:31 So be skeptical, guys, because it's a ridiculous clown show out there today. Now, I want to start with some partisan stuff that I just generally want you to see. I find interesting, but also speaks to kind of the floundering two-party illusion. Now, please do not take this as about Trump only or about the Republicans only or about conservatives only. The moment right now, just like it was during COVID-19, is slanted more so towards the power structure that's actually in control and then you get more of the you know i guess in control of the narrative at the very least and then you get the more so momentum of the supporters from that side that

Starting point is 00:07:05 speak up louder right now you're not getting a lot of the democrat focused conversation because the republicans are the ones in the white house and so the point though is that when i criticize things like this it should be a condemnation of the entire two-party illusion partisans in the left team sport partisans on the right team sports the same idea i just want to stress that because what i'm trying to break down here is the fact that two-party illusion is broken. That's a good thing. It's not working. People are seeing through it and they don't know what to do. So shove us into a technocratic prison, I guess. Kind of joking, but, you know, a lot more between that. But so here's something I thought you might want to see if you think this is all still

Starting point is 00:07:38 hashtag winning. Trump administration agrees to return rainbow pride flag to the New York's Stonewall monument. Now, small thing, frankly, I could care less. It's a flag. Post what you want. As long as it's somebody, you know, idea being is ultimately somebody posting it there rather posting it, placing it there. look, just to cut to the chase, I'm very aware of what that is. I've talked about the history of it. I've talked about how it was used. And I've talked about how it was misrepresented as well. There's a lot around that.

Starting point is 00:08:03 It's still just a piece of fabric. It's the same idea as anything else. And the idea that people were so open arms. The idea is, if you care about it, then discuss it. Take the action where you think is, you know, you want to make a difference, try to get a ban if you think you should, you know, whatever you want to do. But the idea this ever became a government concept or the governments are stepping in and saying you can and can't do this.

Starting point is 00:08:20 You know, here's all these Israeli flags, but you're not allowed to have a Palestinian flag, it's, it's just stupid. And it's inconsistent, it's unconstitutional, the whole thing. But all that aside, it's not even about what you think or feel. It's about the fact that you were told one thing by this team and now this team is going, yeah, whatever, it's matter. Now that we're all focused elsewhere, go ahead and put it back because we're not worried about it. Now it's a small point, and there's much more to the story. But I understand that if there are people in the team that fought tooth and nail to make sure that you knew that this was a sign of, you know, just pedophilia. And like, you know, and there are connections to it. I'm not going to deny the interesting

Starting point is 00:08:52 overlap to these stories. That doesn't mean that everybody in LGBT in these groups are pedophiles. It's just that's the game of partisanship. They blend everything together. The point, though, is that these people that were promised that they were fighting these things and they thought they were really fighting those. And now it's like, whatever. My point overall is that the teams will tell you what they want you to hear to get you to think they're on your side, guys, left and right, Biden Trump. It were. I mean, how do we not see that with where we are right now? It's everywhere. So I just thought that was an interesting point to start with because it's just nothing means anything to these people. Now, in this.

Starting point is 00:09:22 regard to the thing I keep talking about, right now, guys, this is obvious what's happening. They're failing. However you want to think that means, it's clear that they're failing. They are not achieving what they said they were going to achieve. Whether you think they somehow obliterated Iran and just want to make a deal with the thing that doesn't exist, however that makes sense to you, it doesn't matter. They're still failing because they're not achieving their goals. And that is being very clearly discussed. They criticized by their own people.

Starting point is 00:09:47 Now, to be real, I do think they're failing. I think they're militarily failing in a lot of ways. they're lying about Iran everywhere you can look. So it's pretty clear that they have to lie about Iran, which suggests that it's not in the position they claim. That doesn't mean that it's Iran then is winning. I don't think anybody should be making those kind of assessments at this point because there's so much dishonesty and so much, you know, fog of war, if you will,

Starting point is 00:10:08 even though we shouldn't use that as an excuse. My point, though, is that with all of this, while they're on their back foot, while their own team is turning on them, even if it's based on lies, they're in a vulnerable position. Really, the government, but in this moment, the current administration, and what you get, just like with Biden and COVID, the whole damn thing, partisans circle the wagons, rather team sport partisans. And it's just crazy. One, based on the idea that Trump's administration built this entire narrative around, you know, lock her up and then

Starting point is 00:10:36 didn't do that and then built the same kind of momentum around just, you know, Koshwab and Bill Gates and whatever else, the Alex Jones got everybody ramped up about. But now he hate Trump, you know, doesn't really, though. We'll get to that in a second briefly. And what you get are these kind of major accounts. I was just pointing to. This one's 4,000 followers. And they just keep doing this. This is from April 7th. And it just says, just in. It's not just in. FBI director Casper ale reportedly gearing up to drop the hammer. Federal criminal charges against Barack Obama and dozens of co-conspirators. And Ed Grok says absolutely not true at all. It's not happening. It's a viral claim that people keep sharing, but it's not actually real. Surprise, surprise.

Starting point is 00:11:13 See, you knew that already, because I told you that already. But even Grock will tell you that. And it's funny how even they will still ignore it. The point. is this gets tons of reach. This is actually smaller, to be honest. Most of them are millions. Give it to the end of the day. I bet you, oh, I see it's the seventh. Anyway, the point is these things all get spread.

Starting point is 00:11:29 I mean, that's 130,000 views is not small things. But here's another one. Robert, Robert, Real Rob is his name. Real Robert. He says, newly hidden FBI documents released by Cash Patel, confirm the FBI stage January 6th, five months before. Okay. Now, just to be clear for those new to the show,

Starting point is 00:11:48 whether the claim before about Obama being criminal, he is a criminal. He should be in jail. Whether it's for something, maybe I disagree on what it is. Just making a point in regard to what they're claiming, Obama's a criminal. He should be in prison. Like I believe a lot of them, pretty much everyone you could point to in my opinion, because of the different war crimes they've committed every time I've, I mean, my entire lifetime, I've watched our presidents commit blatant war crimes.

Starting point is 00:12:09 It just doesn't get discussed as much as it has been today, which is a fair point to make by people frustrated why they didn't call it out about previous presidents. That's fair. Doesn't mean you should not care when Trump does it, which is not how that works. But my point is that this is obviously important. January 6th, there was a lot of crimes that took place. Pelosi, I argue, should be in jail. For those that see me do this, you already know where I'm going, but just for those that need to hear it. The idea is that this should be done. Okay, so what are they doing? Well, Robert comes out and goes, breaking news and tells you old things. This is not new information. The real question is,

Starting point is 00:12:46 will they do anything? Now watch as nothing happens as real Robert never calls them out for following, not following through. And also watches this very fake platform rewards him for doing that. Now, I'm not going to talk about it today, but everyone I'm sure has seen this going around on Twitter. This is, there's an interesting change happening. Honestly, I think it's being used against us. I think it's kind of a problem reaction solution to get them to sort of censor breaking information. Either way, they're now sort of allegedly turning on the red light, holy crap guys, as I called them, as somebody actually made a meme for me. And that's what they're doing.

Starting point is 00:13:17 They're saying, you're not allowed to do this kind of stuff where they put red light and lie, and they get millions of views and make millions of dollars, literally. And suddenly, apparently, they're going to crack down on that, which I think is a problem or action solution.

Starting point is 00:13:28 But either way, my point is, it is still reaching people, and it is still distracting people. Now, the reason that's important is not just because it could reach, it's because Elon shares it. Trump shares it. They are feeding this machine.

Starting point is 00:13:39 And that's the real point because it shows you that they need this, that there is a desperation, there's an effort to get you distracted. Now, Trump girl, MAGA Patriot, 200,000 followers. It's all just kind of like this same old thing, just regurgitated, puts this one out that says, breaking news channels never told you this. Now, just sum it up very quickly.

Starting point is 00:13:58 It argues that Donald Trump bought Ed McMahon's home and let him live there for the rest of his life because he's a very, very nice person. It's not true, by the way, but, you know, sounds like a nice story. And what this person says is, and they lied to you because they hate Trump and they'll never tell you all the great things he does. sure even if you think that's true how about we care about the facts which is it's not actually accurate and i believe it's right here if you want to ask rock to and it simply says no the story is not accurate the bottom line read it for yourself is that trump talked about this in fact i think oh here i just highlighted it right here simple point it's heavily romanticized and exaggerated versions of events

Starting point is 00:14:34 that mixes some truth the significant inaccuracies omissions and myth making don't trump publicly offered to help right when this started 2008 trump described that as an honor because he'd grown up watching McMahon when he talked about the idea of maybe helping him. The outcome, Trump didn't close the deal. Probably got distracted. May just said it because he wanted you to think he was a good person, you know, or you can fill in the gap how you see fit. McMahon sold the home to a private buyer, not Trump. So yeah, that didn't happen. Now, maybe they got confused. But the story becomes, then they let him live there for the rest of their live and event of all these added details, which are nowhere. So they're lying.

Starting point is 00:15:10 Quietly without any camera, without any press. Well, guess what? Trump, went public with the offer the moment he put it out there. He screamed about how he wanted to do this, then didn't even follow through. So the idea is that they did this secretly and didn't tell anybody because he's a good person. Why do they have to make these things up? Now, here's the kicker. Donald Trump shared that himself. I mean, isn't that just disgusting? Like, to really think about that for a second, this entire story that is literally made up. It goes on to say the whole world new and every channel covered, they never said he did it. They never told you he was doing. They lied. It literally goes on to make the story that he bought the house, let him live there his entire life,

Starting point is 00:15:42 and the media have refused to tell you that. Donald Trump shared this with no commentary. You don't understand. He knows that's not true. Why would he do that? No commentary so he can then go, oh, I was just making fun of it or whatever dumb thing.

Starting point is 00:15:56 Like, I thought I was a doctor in that picture, not the obvious thing I was making fun of the Pope for. You know, these ridiculous stories that nobody believes, but the team backs up. This is ridiculous to me and disgusting. I mean, this is a bad person. It's a manipulative, dishonest, small, petty person. And in case you're curious, I think the same thing about Biden.

Starting point is 00:16:18 Now, here is Tulsi Gabbard. Now, I found this one really interesting. This is today, ladies and gentlemen. Now, just because she posted it, I almost, I almost don't even want to say this because she's been putting herself into it, working into herself into a pressel to lie for Trump. And I was going to say, because she posted it today, maybe there's a reason to think it might actually be happening. I hope so. She says newly declassified records, but they're not newly declassified, seeing as how you guys have been saying that, you said this, they reported that right when Trump came into power you guys were going we're going to you know treason and you know all the things they were screaming and we're going to break this down about Obama we're

Starting point is 00:16:52 going to break this down about Pelosi and nothing happened but declassified records expose how deep state actors within the intelligence community concocted a false narrative correct that Congress never that used to usurp the will of the American people and impeached truly elected president Donald Trump funny how he pretends he wasn't impeached but so I simply said so do something about it Tulsi Gabbard another post stating that at this point only seems to imply further that nothing will be done to put those criminals in jail. Since this admin has been claiming that they have evidence for over a year with zero action, but,

Starting point is 00:17:23 and I doubt anything will change. But what you get is all the same people, this is millions of followers and this person says, treason, it's a big deal saying that word. I hope he goes to jail. You know what I think, though? It's not going to,

Starting point is 00:17:35 or excuse me, in this one, it would be specifically the overlap of a, well, in any of them, where it's Pelosi, Obama, Congress, Social Security fraud,

Starting point is 00:17:43 I mean, you name it. I mean, James Woods keeps screaming about Nick Shirley and all the fraud. It's weird how he never seems to get mad that nobody does anything about it. Isn't that funny? It's almost like they don't care. It's almost like they're the ones that they're the ones that don't care. But we do, but we're the ones that are supposed to be, you know, whatever.

Starting point is 00:17:58 It's just hilarious. Now here is the office of the DNI on top of that. Another bad day for the deep state. Why? Because Trump was acquitted. They show a picture of him being acquitted. So apparently the bad day for the deep state is when Trump doesn't go to jail when they try to hit, but then nothing happens and he's still in power.

Starting point is 00:18:13 What a bad day for the deep state. Why does that imply that he's going to do nothing about it? Why would it be a bad day for nothing to actually happen to them? That's a good day for the deep state because nothing happens to them. But let's keep pretending, like yelling that nothing happened to Trump is all that matters. Because we won, right? Because the deep state's defeated because Trump didn't go to jail? No, not really.

Starting point is 00:18:33 Holy smokes, Eric Dowdardt. He says, DNI, Tulsi Gabbard just declassified Bob shall report 2016. We hid from people. Blah, blah, blah. Tired. It's the same, same thing. Just the News. This so-called whistleblower apologized for accusing Trump and the misleading the probe

Starting point is 00:18:51 and vulgarine. It's just the same old stuff. Now, again, I genuinely, and now they're putting these weird little clips out side by side. It's like this new thing they're trying to do, I think, to circumvent the whole thing that Twitter says they're doing to the people that literally use a red light, holy smokes, holy crap, and then lie to you. I mean, it's like, it's literally what they're talking about right now. But that doesn't seem to stop them from helping these platforms.

Starting point is 00:19:12 but it just never stops. Here's the Don Keith. Bombshell, CIA director, John Ratcliffe, dropped the hammer. Former CIA director Brenner and former James Comey and Hillary Clinton are likely to be indicted for their central roles in the Russia Gate hoax. Cool.

Starting point is 00:19:25 Sounds exciting. Let me know when something happens. Because James Comey was already, so you mean you just didn't care to include this bombshell information when you already threw a case at James Comey? Or did you just ignore that or forget it was there? Or did this just get discovered?

Starting point is 00:19:39 But if that's the case, then what, you know, obviously, this is silly, guys? James Comey would be in prison if they had this information. It was actually a crime. I think they're all criminals, guys. After years of spying and trying, it just never stopped. Same point. Do something.

Starting point is 00:19:52 Let us know when somebody goes to jail. Liz Churchill. CIA director Ratcliffe. Adam Schiff covertly conspired with the fake whistleblower Eric's was it, Seer, Mella, in the attempt to overthrow the sitting president. Good. Put him in jail. Charge him the crime.

Starting point is 00:20:07 Do something about it. Over and over and over and over. And this is just a fraction of these things. things. Now, here's an interesting one you'll want to hear. Sort of this based on a fact. Luminati bot shared this today. You can watch the clip. It's about five minutes. Here's former CDC director, you know the one under Donald Trump, who confirmed by oath that they were hiding the side effects of the COVID-19 vaccines. Now, funny how this is sort of a different point, right? See, over here, we've got them lying or technically pointing to real crimes, or it depends on how

Starting point is 00:20:38 you look at which points they're talking about. But no, I'm pointing out nothing will happen. And then even more so that all those people that act like they care about it never seem to get mad when nothing happens. Here's an example of somebody who was under Donald Trump who's admitting that while they were in power, they lied about the side effects of COVID-19 vaccines and nothing has happened about it. But that's not going to be jumped on by the Republican, but nonetheless, it shows you that either way you look at it, guys, they don't do anything. This wouldn't happen, obviously, because it's going to make them look like criminals and

Starting point is 00:21:07 they are criminals, but either way you look at it, the evidence can be there. They can admit it in front of everybody, but nothing will have. happen. And this is about COVID-19 stuff. Bread and butter for the Republican Party, so we're told. Now, what you get, typically as well from the individuals, funny, I went back and forth to somebody about this today,

Starting point is 00:21:24 is that Elon Musk comes out and does this again. I mean, didn't we already go through this? This is the exact same video he played before, which, by the way, was also very misrepresented. It wasn't actually what he claimed it was. Now, point is, regardless of this, that to dive into this full story again, this says each cross represents a white farmer

Starting point is 00:21:40 who was murdered in South Africa. This is the same story. They're just regurgitating again. Now, to be clear, this is not an, there is, it should not be diminished the suffering that's happening to, to anybody in Africa, whether white farmers or black farmers, but let's be clear, there is racial violence that is being waged in one, in many places against white farmers or white people in Africa. The same thing exists in reverse.

Starting point is 00:22:03 Now, also remember the long-term apartheid that Elon seems to not care about, who seems to almost support in most places in the world, is what drove that into reality. say it's okay, but people are reacting to that in response. Violence in response to violence is not something I agree with, but it's a point to understand why it might be happening. But either way, the point here is that to come out and say, just each cross represents a family and point that this on the 12th, when we already know how this was misrepresented on purpose is not to say that there's not something we should be discussing in the story, that there aren't people who are suffering in the story, but Elon Musk is using a manipulated story yet again to deflect when everything's falling around

Starting point is 00:22:40 their ankles. That's what I think is the genuine point, which I said, enter Elon with another deflection campaign. A deflection does not mean the information below means nothing. It does not mean the story down there is untrue. It just means using this story to make you look over there when you should be looking over there. You'll see why I said that when you look at the conversation below. Because as I pointed out, the conversation in South Africa is complicated. There's very clearly crimes being, you know, it's not to make it fence sitting either. If we're going to be real, what they're covering is a lie. At the end of the day,

Starting point is 00:23:12 what he's trying to do, which is why he had to manipulate Grock into lying about it for him, literally saying, people, I remember the joke, well, the reality was people were going like,

Starting point is 00:23:20 hey, what's the score on the baseball game today? And Grock was like, there's no, there's a South, there's a white genocide in South Africa. And it would literally respond like that. So the point is note that there's not,

Starting point is 00:23:31 there's not an absence of crime against white people in Africa, and some of it is very clearly racially motivated and it should be called out. But if you're going to look at the big picture, that's not the reality of the story. And so what's important to understand is that he is coming in yet again to try to get you to jump at something else.

Starting point is 00:23:47 I mean, he might as well be coming on and talking about Venezuela stealing voting machines again. Oh, you mean those air conditioners from 20 years ago that you're pointing to on that video or everything else that he does like this at the right moment? Now, this is what I was laughing about a second ago. This is you posted this. This is just one of them, by the way. I mean, for the podcast, it's exactly what I laugh about.

Starting point is 00:24:08 Red light, massive. red light, it's official, red light, holy smokes, red light. And it's just most of that stuff's not even true, to be honest. And this one says, and this is Eric up here saying, after JD Vance led negotiations wrapped minutes ago, everything discussed has been kept very tight. We're going to get into this in a second. This just says Eric clearly started doing original content for monetization,

Starting point is 00:24:28 now where he takes someone else's video and puts it next to a still shot. I might get into more of this another show just because there is this kind of evolution as they're trying to evolve around the thing that seems to be calling out what they're doing. but these are the people are dealing with. Cat turd, only traders need a pre-pardon, he says, right? When we're hearing about Biden stuff, but then Trump comes out and you hear about him promising pardons, and he goes, you'll have to be, have to do it because, you know, Democrats.

Starting point is 00:24:52 These people have no principles, guys. They're just bad people. Oh, in case you missed it, here's gone through Eagleman's chat that people are showing where he is offering retweets for money because these people are grifters. And then here is Jason Rans talking about, this will get into the point of Iran where he says Clinton bombed Serbia's power plants for 78 days. Yeah, correct. And those crimes.

Starting point is 00:25:15 Obama destroyed ISIS oil infrastructure serving millions. Yeah, crime. Whether ISIS or not, we're talking about civilian infrastructure that was simply abused by that's a crime. That's a crime. Yes, correct. Okay. Now the same media calls Trump's possible Iran strikes a war crime. You know, why Jason?

Starting point is 00:25:28 Because it is. See how easy that is? See how consistent that can be? But no, he goes, no, because they didn't call a crime. Therefore, that not crime. But that's not, that's one. That's two plus two equals five, my friend. Now the same media calls Trump's possible strikes a crime.

Starting point is 00:25:42 The legal standard tells us different story. Well, no, it doesn't. The legal standard is the reality. They've never upheld that standard, which is funny, isn't it? But see, he comes down here with his article and says, Trump's Iran strikes isn't a war crime. Isn't a war crime. It's a Democrat double standard.

Starting point is 00:25:56 But wait a minute. Okay, so what are you trying to say here? Let's just very quickly make this case. You're saying that Democrats did these bad things, right? It's a bad thing, but then, but it's okay when they do it, so therefore it's okay when Trump does it. But that doesn't mean it's not a war crime. Based on your argument itself, you're implying that it is a war crime, but he shouldn't be

Starting point is 00:26:15 accountable because you didn't do it then, like a kindergarten argument, right? This is not, these are not serious people. If you're genuinely arguing that it shouldn't matter because they did it first, this is kindergarten stuff. The truth is, it was a crime then. It's a crime now. And I can understand why it would be frustrating, especially from a partisan view, which I can't take that seriously anyway, is to think that it's, you know, it's not fair.

Starting point is 00:26:37 I understand, I guess, but it's still crimes. Charge him to the crime. You want to retroactively try to charge them? I agree. We'll do it together. But this is not serious. And also by this logic, then the next time Democrats commit the crime, well, you shouldn't charge them either, right, Jason?

Starting point is 00:26:50 Because you didn't charge Trump, right? That's the same logic. He'd probably disagree. Now, this is funny to me. This person says, I'm in London marching with 30K brave Iranian patriots in the U.S. embassy. Iran must be liberated to save the Iranian people. And I said, wait, wait, wait, wait, wait. wait a minute. I thought it was an invasion. Didn't we just talk about this? Isn't it an invasion

Starting point is 00:27:12 to have that many foreign flags flown in the streets of London or the U.S.? Right? Right. Elon Musk? Isn't that what we were told? Or is there not consistent logic here? Are we being hypocritical? Well, you guys know the answer to that. Or does this only apply to groups that you want to lie about? Funny. Now, Father, I'm realizing right now, by the way, I was asked if I could increase the size of my window. I'm not even sure how I do that, but I'll try to do that for upcoming shows. I don't know how to make that work. I'll have to figure it out later. But yeah, in case you guys want my screen to be bigger for the show, I'm happy to do that.

Starting point is 00:27:46 I just need to figure it out. But that would minimize the size of the screen, which that's why I was airing on. I figure you guys cared more about the, I mean, I'm sure you do. But, you know, in the general sense that it's easier to see the content than me, but just bear that in mind. Somebody let me know, to tell oral in the chat how to figure that out and I'll do it next time. But I think this is an important point as much as it's just kind of propaganda stuff. You know, like this is this is the kind of point that reaches the people that,

Starting point is 00:28:09 have yet to really see the lie, but aren't dishonest. You know what I mean? Where they go, oh, you know, that is, that's just logically consistent. Why would that Palestinian flags or even Mexican flags be an invasion where all these Iranian Shah flags, by the way, which basically exist nowhere except some imagination of oligarchs is somehow not the same thing. It's all freedom and democracy. It's just these are dishonest, hypocritical people.

Starting point is 00:28:34 Lastly, on propaganda guys, Neil Stone says this image of the regime washing blood off the streets number they told you all Ronnie and killed all these protesters and they kept wanting you to think that but this is the kind of stuff they put forward now realize they did kill people and some of them are probably innocent people i can acknowledge that i can't prove that neither can they but reality is that the people that were shot were the ones that were armed that the unions admitted that osad admitted that pompeo admitted that trump's administration admitted that they armed and motivated to overtake their government that's called a crime so it doesn't either way you look at it but the numbers they put forward were just lies and that's been retroactive

Starting point is 00:29:09 actively showing a lot of different ways. In this case, he says, look at them washing the blood out of the streets after they massacred protesters in January. It's intensely, intensely symbolic. The international community is whitewashing the regime all over again. Well, not true. Now, and again, as always, for those are new to the show, I'm not, I never will ever take Grockett face value.

Starting point is 00:29:29 My own research showed that this was altered. I looked at my AI or not. I looked at a few different things. And then my point is to show these things rarely has an effect on the partisans. A platform built by another partisan who alters the platform in their interest might just reach them. And that's this Grock plat, that's AIXAI. It says this specific image is AI generated or fabricated. Most obviously because there's the wrong language on the signs in the background.

Starting point is 00:29:56 But you see, this stuff doesn't matter to people who just want to go with what they see or, you know, or I shouldn't say that. I'm not even familiar with him. Maybe he just believes this is the reality and didn't do his due diligence. That's just the same problem, guys. everywhere. Now, I'm not going to get into this just for time because it's, I just, but I think it's, I, I almost feel like I want to go through it in some sense for this, but maybe, you know, maybe another point. But just understand this that, if you listen to this

Starting point is 00:30:20 clip, he literally, it's, it's almost as if he just has been watching our shows over the last couple of months and it's just now parroting what we've been saying the entire time, or even years, quite frankly. And remember, these are the same people he called, we are the same people he called Blackpilled. He said it was trying to, you know, I, or, or whatever the other terms were fighting for Iran or fighting for a foreign country or, you know, whatever it is. At the time in 2024, the IMA was built, was literally decided to be created by Derek Whitney and myself because of the things they're now pointing to, the things we called out

Starting point is 00:30:53 in 2024. That's not meant to be some kind of look at us. One, it's demonstrating our value. It matters that we were that clear about this way back then. And so were a lot of people, by the way. And people like this, so that's a purity test and you're black pilled. then no, we just called what we thought. We could have been wrong,

Starting point is 00:31:09 but we also weren't making some kind of an all-or-nothing argument either. But he says now, yesterday, Trump says U.S. will block aides, trade of Ramos, if Iran peace fails, talks fail, which they designed to fail. Israel prepares troops for war after purposely setting up the United States for economic collapse. Oh, yeah, yeah, you know, like we were trying to warn you about that you shouted us down for, and Black Rock is running the show. Yeah, you know what's funny about that?

Starting point is 00:31:30 Here is Larry, just an article. And I bring this up because it's easy to bring it. bring up my browser. But I did an entire segment on this. This is from 2025 April. And I mean, look, how about even this one? This is actually much better. This goes back to his first administration.

Starting point is 00:31:51 Donald Trump's first administration. You know, this whole argument that he's changed? Nope, the COVID coup. The BlackRock takeover of American interest was 2020. And before. This is when BlackRock and Larry Fink were essentially headed the keys to the financial reality of this country. He didn't seem to recognize it then.

Starting point is 00:32:05 No, the reality is he didn't care. it was, that's my opinion. It was, the interest was not there for him. My point is he did see it and chose not to do anything about it. That's what I would argue. Today, everyone sees it like I've been telling you since January, and now he's turning because people see it. And that's what they do.

Starting point is 00:32:25 They're fair weather, guys. But BlackRock is running the show. Yeah, that's been going on since the first administration and before even. And the world economy is the real target. So here we go. Now it's spinning back around into exactly what we were talking about in regard to the long, term great reset engineering the change of society that I have been screaming and jumping up and

Starting point is 00:32:42 down about since a year now. And like for example, Ian Davis, so I'm going to interview in a very near future. He's, he wrote a book about this. He's been talking about this longer than most people I know. It's there. It's been there. He's in the IMA. And he says, this is COVID 2.0. Oh, really? So like another engineered transition, great reset. Yeah, but exactly. Now, if he sees this and genuinely wants to change that, then good. I'm still going to criticize him for not acknowledging that he dragged half the conversation into supporting Trump, even the ones that didn't like him because they thought, well, Kamala was worse. It's the same conversation. That's what people are starting to recognize. Not that, oh, well, Kamala should have been the answer. No,

Starting point is 00:33:19 none of them should have been the answer. Or at the very least, anybody other than the ones they were presenting for you could have been the answer. The reality here is that this person dragged you into that and is now basically falling back into our arguments and people are going, yay, he's breaking it down. And far too many people, even the ones who were listening to us while he was spinning out are now gravitating back to the people like this.

Starting point is 00:33:40 I don't think it's the majority at all. But my point is to, it's not about trying to gain, you know, anything. It's about people seeing the truth. And if you're gravitating back to him, you're not. My opinion, anyway. Larry Fink abruptly becomes

Starting point is 00:33:54 part of Trump's inner circle, 2025. Surprise, surprise. Now, this person says, thanks for being completely wrong on Trump, you big, dumb moron. It was the other way around the whole time. So here is what audience capture looks like. And this is people that are supporting him who are now going, no, you're heading on Trump.

Starting point is 00:34:15 That's not the what you're supposed to do because that's how he's trained his audience this whole time. Support him no matter what. And he says, you don't seem to understand he was good on policy before. Now he's back. Guys, please take a second and look at his policy. What are we talking about Alex Jones? What's different? He talked about Iran war in his first administration.

Starting point is 00:34:34 He did the same exact things. He also yelled peace president and yelled then the Fed and the IRS and lower government, lower cost, lower everything, didn't do any of that. He yells a lot of things. He does the same things. He's been the same person he was then, that he is now. He was the same personality is then the same point. He's the same exact person he was then with the same exact policy. As anyone not desperately trying to side step responsibility for their actions can admit, that's the truth.

Starting point is 00:35:03 I mean, I'm not saying that as a respect. Look for yourself, guys. Look at what he did then. Look at what he said he was going to do and look at what he's doing. Like there's a contradiction that you can't deny. Guys, the same thing he did the first time. He promised all these things about even that end the Fed. And he tapped into all the conspiracy theories and to lock her up and all this.

Starting point is 00:35:20 None of that happened. The game of he just got it all done is the same. Why they tried to push this time. It just didn't work. Here's Tim Poole. Now, see, he did this weird little thing where he tries to post something where he acts like he's not really, it's like an edd lord thing where it's like he post a thing that he thinks people think he should say and he's kind of making fun of it. But it's, but he does this often in the

Starting point is 00:35:41 past where it really is kind of his way of getting past it. Or he posts it, he does a clip on his show where he goes, I'm going to say this and it's not true. And then put this thing out. And then people share and he go, I told you, they're all lying about me. Well, whatever. All that aside, you're still doing the same thing. You are still the same person. You're still following the same traps and you're just being more of a coward about it by not actually taking it head on. I mean, look, to give it some level of credit, at least I like, I like, Jones is going, I made a mistake and I was wrong, even though I don't feel as genuine, you're not getting that from this clown.

Starting point is 00:36:07 He says, the things that I've learned about AI recently have left me shocked. Gee, again, one of the people who literally called us blackpilled for talking about where this was going to go. Suffice you to say, there's an agenda in which you will own nothing and you will be happy. Oh, okay. You mean literally the transition of society that we've been talking about that you guys all laughed about and told us we were blatant on Trump or whatever. A tsunami is coming.

Starting point is 00:36:30 Like, this is what kills me is these people will stop. step into this and there are honest people that will fall for this and think that they see it. Many technocrats view this is a good thing. Technology shift to free the minds of humans. However, the shift will leave millions without meaningful ways to engage with the economy and the short-term political. I mean, talk about burying the lead or not even mentioning the lead. Oh, yeah, it's going to be a struggle to get some economic transition. Yeah, or it'll completely control your life in some kind of slave technocratic society that they're literally salivating about or the idea that this, I mean, I could go off forever.

Starting point is 00:37:01 The point is he's now going, AI tech's already here. I see it. And this person says the people think the globalists have given up. They haven't. It shows Liz and Wef. Yeah, you mean literally the Donald Trump administration? That's not what Tim is going to do. That's not what these people are.

Starting point is 00:37:16 You can hear all of this stuff. Okay, wait a minute. The AI transition. And who exactly is running that through? Oh, that's the Donald Trump administration. Packed with every AI people. The entire AI industry is in his administration. But yet AI is the problem.

Starting point is 00:37:29 And that's because of the weft. and Trump's fighting the globalist, because Alex said, I mean, he's actually still basically saying that. If you looked at that last video, he basically says at the end that we're still fighting the globalists and we almost got it. Who are you talking about? Now, clearly he's saying he's mad and fighting with Trump,

Starting point is 00:37:44 but when you listen to his argument, he's on the same side as Trump. And yet still aiming as if we're fighting the globalist when every other point you're making is about how this is all about globalism, but you fail to still make the point that Trump is that. Even with what's been changed, it's just sad.

Starting point is 00:38:01 This is globalism. This is technocracy. It's happening right in front of you with this dangerous Zionism disease that's woven its way through all of it. And this is, are people unwilling to see that, in my opinion, the reality of it. And here's Alex pointing to Candace Jones saying, Candace was ahead of the curve and I officially apologized to her. He's just doing his rounds, but he's not really getting to the meat of the conversation. Candice Owens plays a compilation of former Trump allies disavowing, criticizing him, right?

Starting point is 00:38:28 Because a lot of people are now doing that. and he says he's even getting slammed on true social, his own platform. And he quotes himself, I guess, and says, I'm really glad he's differentiating and saying, you're not with me. I don't want to be at your cool kid party. Oh, cool. Well, glad you're now finally so strong to take your stance. But you see, now that everyone is turning on him, now that true social is turning on him,

Starting point is 00:38:48 now that everyone's standing up, well, now Alex feels comfortable to come out and be like, okay, now I can make the case. That's what's happening, guys, whether this was right after or not. This is why they're shifting. and it's worth calling out, okay? It's kind of sad. These people need that background. They have no strength of their own argument

Starting point is 00:39:05 to stand up and go, here's what I think, even though nobody says this, happens on T-Lab every single day. Here he is going happening now. Top American broadcaster, Candice Owens to Trump. This is on the 11th. You will die absolutely a slave to Israel.

Starting point is 00:39:19 You are in the chains right now and the whole world sees it. You'll absolutely die a slave to Israel. Okay. And fair enough, she has been calling it out longer than most of the rest of them. And you should question whether it's sincere, like with all of them. But this is what most of us were saying long before we got here.

Starting point is 00:39:35 Candace and Alex and all the rest, they got you to support Trump. Remember those of us that were saying the Israel infiltration, saying the technocratic issue, saying the great, all of this in 2024. That's the IMA. Easy big, right there. There's your look. Plenty more, I would argue, but that's an easy one to look at. Now here's what he puts out saying Iran's diplomatic corps are saying Netanyahu and Kushner sabotage the peace deal in the 11th hour.

Starting point is 00:40:00 No, that's just what happened. But he says, pay close attention to the expression on Kushner's face. He's happy. This is the kind of nonsense fake journalism you get from people like this. So this has 4, 2.4 million views. And all it is is a weird video with rapidly cut with weird music that just shows Kushner with what seems like a out of focus, maybe smile. Big time journalism right here.

Starting point is 00:40:31 Right? powerful. That's it. Great. So all he's doing, you want my opinion, all he's doing here is glomming on the idea

Starting point is 00:40:40 that we've all been talking about. These two are not on your side. They're not fighting for American interests. In fact, in the past, he praised these two. The point is that they're now working against us. They're working for other agendas.

Starting point is 00:40:50 And now to just basically take that argument and go, but look, here he is smiling in a video. Bombshell! Why is the, you get it, stupid. But it's just slop. It's just, not it's it's it's to get the movement going to act like he's on top of all this in my opinion and this

Starting point is 00:41:07 one says we're in a new world war there it is there it is guess he left out the world war three you just had to go with the we're in a new world war but funny funny how it took him all this time to point out when there's the most obvious example of what he's been screaming has been happening our entire lives isn't that funny every 20 seconds in the past 20 years world war three war three and then we finally have something it takes him this long to even say it i find that very interesting but he says Trump warns any Iranian ships coming close to the block aid, we'll be eliminated. Okay, let's talk about that. He says here...

Starting point is 00:41:34 It's Monday, April 13, 26, and we are now in a new world war anyway. You slice it. America has... And he brings up the Strader for Moose map. Now, look, that's a very public thing, but I just want to point out, I haven't seen seen it news before, and I find it very revealing that this person seems to be basically just repeating most of everything that this platform talks about, and plenty of others in this group.

Starting point is 00:41:57 And I'm telling you guys, it's pretty clear he's... a different path than he was before. I don't see many others on this general discussion point. And like, I've already proven in the past that these groups basically take the stuff. We like a band dot video, for example, where I had a account on there and he censored me from that platform. I've proven this. Look it up in my platform. I had the video live proof. They just booted me off the uncensoredable platform. My point was that I can see when that was happening that the content points that I would make were then randomly posted on their website without credit to me. And in fact, one time I reached up to Jason Burmiss and I said, hey man,

Starting point is 00:42:28 like they're literally using my content, my videos, and cropping out my information, my local, can you please ask him to at least put a link for me? And he reached out to him because Jason knows them from the past. You know what they did? They just deleted the post. Not even joking. Like the information was important. So they posted it, but then because they had to give me credit, they just deleted the whole thing. And this is my point. They know about this platform. They just don't want you to know they know about it. And that matters to me. A point is, I think that's what we're dealing with here. So let's talk about the grand, great reset shift element here, which I think is very important.

Starting point is 00:43:00 Benny Johnson comes out yesterday. By the way, absolute masterclass, I'm telling you. They're all this. They just parrot each other. It's hilarious to me. Now, this video is funny to me. First of all, with this Uno card, childish nonsense, this guy just lowest common denominator.

Starting point is 00:43:16 He's saying that this is the biggest economic move and what is you pointing to? The same thing we just discussed yesterday. This idea, this is not some bumbling classic failure of Trump or the U.S. government. Rather, it's been some grand play, maybe even going back to all the failures of his last administration, wouldn't that be convenient, to open this door to say, well, it's all this grand plan.

Starting point is 00:43:36 And maybe I'll play the video real quickly to just reorganize the global economy. But you guys realize, why is that something any MAGA is praising? It challenges everything you're promised. It hurts the current American reality. And maybe in lieu or in interest of a, I don't know, a month's long, long term shift in the interest of the U.S. power structure controlling the global. economy or the global dynamic. That's not, you think, what you think Americans are running?

Starting point is 00:44:02 Do you think you're going to be on the helm of that ship? We're talking about the oligarchy. We're talking about the technocracy. We're talking about whatever they then claim is the American structure after whatever that looks like. That's going to be the Palantiers and that's not going to be us. So anyway, let me just do that since let's do it real quick. I'll play this clip.

Starting point is 00:44:19 I believe I still have it in there. Great. This is not working for some reason. Well, screw it. What's funny is I had zero videos. today. Like zero. I always have plenty. I was going to rush. And now for some reason, as I try to bring in a video, it just won't let me. You just got to love it. Let's see if I can grab this one. Now it's going to be too big for that. Let's see. That's so frustrating. Let me see if this

Starting point is 00:44:49 works. Let me see if I can drop out and come back back and play this video. Tell me when I come back if this video keeps playing when I leave. I frankly think that crisis initiation is really tough. And it's very hard for me to see how the United States, uh, president, can get us to war with Iran, which leads me to conclude that if, in fact, compromise is not company, that the traditional way of America gets to war is what would be best for us interests. Some people might think that Mr. Roosevelt won't get us to the World War II. Oh, man.

Starting point is 00:45:23 You may recall we had to wait for Pearl Harbor. Some people might think Mr. Wilson wanted to get us into World War I. You may recall you have to wait for the Lusatia. I shouldn't have done that. some people now this whole thing is freaking out it clearly kept playing okay good sorry guys whatever's top of the stream yard everything's working every button's freaking out i can't even get my screen to come up right now oh thank god i'm not even going to touch anything after this okay so at least i got this to come up okay good well whatever welcome to the welcome to t laf guys

Starting point is 00:46:01 that's how our life that's how this platform operates on different rules that everybody else Well, that's frustrating. So I can get the videos on the side to play, but I can't bring up that video. Basically, it's the video discussing the transition, basically saying the shutting of the Strait of Hormuz with some kind of engineered long-term play to drive the flow of oil to, you know, the United States, which, by the way, will cause gas prices to explode, will cause issues with supply and shape of demand. It's everything we were calling out during COVID-19, even if it's just regarding Iran ports and blocking that area. Because even right then, you have people who are choosing not to go through there for many reasons.

Starting point is 00:46:33 And I'm telling you, that's the U.S. and Israel driving that mindset, even as of right now, floating the idea that maybe there's still mines in there, there appears to have never been minds in this iteration of the conversation. So for him to come out and say, Trump just pulled off the biggest move in global economic history. First of all, realize that's him just guessing. Because this is a theory. But here's Betty Johnson just saying he did it based on your theory about what you think he's trying to accomplish. And this is my point about these ridiculous people. Iran played their last card. They didn't.

Starting point is 00:47:06 Again, just pathetic. You post this on the 12th. You could see today, that's not true. But, you know, this doesn't matter. Then Trump hit him with an Uno Reverse. Now the deck is getting reshuffled entirely, I guess. I mean, that's not even a good analogy, because I'm not even sure what that would exactly mean.

Starting point is 00:47:22 An Uno Reverse. And this analogy would essentially mean that then you didn't have the last card. It just doesn't make any sense. But the point is, we reshuffle the deck. energy will never flow the same way again. With Venezuela, vast oil reserves under U.S. control, which is kind of a stretch, to be honest. Yes, they've muscled their way into influencing Rodriguez,

Starting point is 00:47:41 if not controlling her, to then exploit that country. But didn't you just tell us that was for Venezuelans? So you're just basically saying, we're just taking control of the royal? Yes, guys, yes, that was always on the cards. It was always what he was planning to do. It's a crime. There's no way around it. As long as he just pretends it for the people,

Starting point is 00:47:56 but then you get his ridiculous commentators to come out and go, we took the oil and we can use it for this plan. And it says, and now the blockade of Hermuse, America now oversees the global oils apply. Is it by, is that by, is that legal? Is that, is it justified? Is it in line with international law? Who cares? We're going to muscle our way in because we can.

Starting point is 00:48:15 That's not even true, by the way. They can't, they're not this strongly to think they are. But the point is, they're still going to, it seems, if this is the reality, it, they would, you could argue that's what they're trying to do. But blockade the trade of Hermose, this also, a debate on whether that's even happening. Countries that want oil must buy from America, as they're arguing might be the reality in the future.

Starting point is 00:48:35 This is the Gulf of America, which is not what it's called, packed with super tankers racing to load up oil to the U.S. Hardest hit China, who just lost their number one and two oil exporters a matter of weeks. Absolute masterclass. Okay, let's just say for sake of conversation,

Starting point is 00:48:47 this is exactly what happened. What is what is about, what about this is America first? Now, the game is not, you know, conquering all of our energy. enemies, achieving every neocon dream, because that will lead to a point where then we're strong in America first. That's just stupid. That's not what it ever meant. It meant no instantaneously.

Starting point is 00:49:09 Actions we're taking, our policy directions are with America in mind first. So not go fight them for that. No, that's not America first. That's Iran, Israel first, maybe with the benefit of the United States, and I guarantee that it's not where we'll go. America first would be to put your resources and your effort, your focus into interest in this country. Everyone who's not a moron is already making that this is not America first. These people, you can see where that sentence can finish. It's obvious what these people are doing. So here's what I said.

Starting point is 00:49:36 Exactly as I was discussing last night, these guys are jumping on this narrative, like a life raft in the middle of the ocean. I think because it paints a picture in which this was the plan, right? Because who cares if all his promises were lies and that it's essentially globalism that you're supporting because hashtag winning, right? Trump did it.

Starting point is 00:49:55 He's tricking everybody else. He's dunking on the Democrats. Really? that's what you care about? Guys, that's just pretty pathetic. I mean, at the end of the day, this is, again, based on an idea, not the fact, based on a theory.

Starting point is 00:50:07 To me, that is the most desperate thing I've seen from people like this so far. Cuck turd, not cat turd, but the one making fun of him, comes out and says, MAGA is bragging about Trump, forcing the world to buy our oil, while gas is at $5 in our strategics

Starting point is 00:50:20 of reserve is nearly empty. Like, think about that for a second. And it says, punching ourselves in the face is now 12D chess. You see, this is the one of the main reasons why I don't think this was truly what the plan was. But, you know, it's possible that they're just fumbling it like they do everything else. Kat is out.

Starting point is 00:50:40 This is just another platform supporting this thing. Cat is out of the bag, finally. Trump does not want the straits of her moose opened. Rather, he wants the world to buy American oil. I guess more, I guess criticizing it, but saying this is diabolical. So another person arguing this is sort of his plan. And it's easy to see it that way. But I want to be clear, it very well could just be him seeing this narrative passed around and going perfect.

Starting point is 00:51:01 Yes, that. I want that. That's what I'm doing. Make it all seem like I've got a master plan here. And I'm not just completely failing and spinning out and trying to hide that. Or in between it all that it is the plan and he's failing at it. There's a lot of different ways to look at it. Or just make sure you take, consider that it's not a simple, you know, grand master idea.

Starting point is 00:51:21 Because I honestly don't even think Trump's capable of making himself look this bad for anything. But here is Spitfire, pretty large, what is it, 360,000 followers, says Trump just changed how the world operates. Not really. You know, it's funny as all of a sudden now they've discovered this. Do you realize what they're showing right there? Those are not tankers, ladies and gentlemen. Those are just random ships. And this is what's so funny about the ignorance of people in this movement.

Starting point is 00:51:45 And I don't mean real MAGA or real MAHA. I mean the team sport players on any side. Okay, here's the map. We'll come back to this. This is an important view I want you to see. Here, I'll just do this. So it'll be simple. that's that's where their tankers are

Starting point is 00:51:56 where their war ships are. But here, remember I showed this before? Here's all ships. Now, this is the straight. Look at that blockade, right? No, it's not. My first, I'm kind of half joking, because the point is those are not tankers.

Starting point is 00:52:09 Those are just ships that's always there. That's my point from day one. It has always been like this from the moment they started until right now. Now, the difference is that that's, that's not the same as oil tankers. So here's oil tankers, which don't seem to be anywhere in the strait,

Starting point is 00:52:24 but only on the out like up here and down here. Now also we'll come back to that too. I don't see what they keep pointing to. I see a few of them over here, but there's not this massive train that they keep pointing to. What they're really showing is like the long term, all of them as if it's one image. They just, it's what they do, guys, partisans manipulate.

Starting point is 00:52:43 It's what they do. But no, but there are plenty of them going around. But so my point would be that if you then show this location over here and make it look like, stupid thing it's not sorry it's hard to move this thing with a small screen right here so we're talking about the Gulf of Mexico and then you can go to the traffic change

Starting point is 00:53:10 and make it all ships right or rather first tankers or excuse me oh yeah I mean that's what they're trying to show tankers so right there so you know three of them right now in the Gulf of Mexico go to all ships and it suddenly looks like there's tons I forgot this is on the street of Fremuz right here.

Starting point is 00:53:32 You already know. But I mean, so that's what she's showing. So when she shows this, what she's really trying to relate to you is that that's all tankers. Trump's changed the world. You realize that even when they were supposedly closing the street, all of that was the same. These are random ships and personal ships.

Starting point is 00:53:47 So they're just deceiving you. Or rather, she doesn't know that, by the way. But I simply said, see how it works? Many of us outlined where this was going weeks ago. Like this bubbling up narrative that this was half, this idea that he was, you know, reorganizing the way this all worked. We're not psychic, right? It's just easy to see how these partisan narratives trends flow.

Starting point is 00:54:07 I saw the video. I started to get pointed to. And my mind was, that's why I brought it up. I said, watch this kind of filters through the conversation. If this is the reality, though, Trump broke his promises to you for a globalist plan. Or maybe you just want to pretend he didn't lose. And Clint Russell makes a good point. Don't forget that he very much also supported this and also very much called us blackpilled

Starting point is 00:54:27 from pointing all of this. out when it was able to be stopped. But he says the U.S. is a net importer of crude oil. The only value in this is that you can sell in U.S.D. But here's the thing. And he's right. Two months ago, nearly all oil going through remorse was sold in U.S.D. So this is the same kind of idea. He's just said, so we've gained nothing and risked the global economy. So the truth is that really the easiest point here is that Trump is trying to reframe the goal to make it look like ending up where he started is somehow him winning, which speaks to the fact that he lost. And so arguing you're getting USD, but you have higher prices is a lose.

Starting point is 00:55:04 It's a loss, guys, because it was already there. It was also already open before this. It was that they were already offering to give up their enrichment. They were already offering no nuclear weapons. All of that was already the reality before this. And that goes back to the same post that the former minister of Oman was saying in February 28th. They agreed to all of the things they're currently screaming about. But that's no longer on the table because of what they did. And then acting like because they don't agree to it a second time after they murdered them during the fact they were agreeing to, that somehow they're the ones being complicated. It's just insane.

Starting point is 00:55:33 So remember, Glenn Greenwald points out, and it's important to go back. So I'm going to try to wrap this up in the next 20 minutes if I can. Trump told the Washington Post on the first day of the war that his main concern is freedom for the Iranian people as the U.S. launched military strikes in the country. Yet, hordes of Trump followers will insist this was never the war aim and he never said this. Because right now, where are we guys? Freedom for the Iranian people? Is that even where they're aiming?

Starting point is 00:55:55 No, Trump is that, that wasn't even, that was never the plan. But now he's shifted into open the straight is what we always wanted. Nope, that was, it was open when you started this. But realize how much the mission creep is always there. It's sad. And won't forget, as Patrick Henderson pointed out, even the other mediators and are on themselves. We're like, they literally, Vance was calling Netanyahu throughout the conversation. Now Trump, mind you, I guess the argument was he calling Trump as well.

Starting point is 00:56:22 But what everyone's pointed out is that he called Netanyahu constantly. And here is Netanyahu admitting that. The tag, as Patrick writes, the tail waggs the dog. Vance works directly under the shadow president, Benjamin Netanyahu. And he says, Vance personally relayed the details of the peace talks to him from Islamabad in detail as it was happening. It's like, okay, why does that make sense to anybody? China backs Iran. China, their foreign minister, says, we want peace and stability in the world. We are not happy how the U.S. delegation tried to hijack talks with unreasonable demands. Because everybody sees this other than people blindly following the lying Vance, Rubio,

Starting point is 00:56:58 Trump administration dynamic. This is partisanship, guys. It's obvious that these people were being misled, and everyone around them is going, yeah, the U.S. is being unacceptable. And yet we just can't be honest about that in this country. Trying to act as a key facilitator. Now, Fricon also points out that Al Jazeera is discussing what the Gulf states are pointing out, which is that there's no military solution, that they failed.

Starting point is 00:57:20 And it's saying that they're desperately pushing for diplomacy because they're terrified that Israel will intentionally sabotage the peace deal, which everyone knows that's what's going on. Now, Glenn Greenwald also points out that Vance is lying like usual about both of these, really, but this is about the National Proliferation Treaty. And then he gave, basically, that gives the signatory the right to enrich uranium, any of them. And it has been the position of every administration, including Trump in 2025, that Iran has the right to enrich to 3.67 percent, which was, by the way, what they maintained under the JCPOA that Donald Trump removed from Trump.

Starting point is 00:57:58 was it Trump did just change Israel's view to zero enrichment. They're just changing it now. But remember, that's why it's important that this was always where it was before. And they have that legal right. But they did agree, according to everybody, to get rid of their stockpile, get and actually go in the direction of no program. And they bombed them the night that they agreed to this. There's a reason for that because they, that would then put the position of Israel,

Starting point is 00:58:22 the United States as, okay, Iran agreed. So it's over. And they don't want it to be over. because it's not about the lie of a nuclear bomb, it's about taking the country. And so here's Van saying, how can you negotiate with them? Oh, basically what he says,

Starting point is 00:58:35 oh, no, I didn't grab it. Anyway, I couldn't bring it up anyway if I did. I'm not even sure I'll try it again. Yep, still not working. Thanks, Dreamyard. So it says, how can you negotiate with them when this is the smartest one of their team? Now, basically what he says,

Starting point is 00:58:49 he goes, the second thing with Goli Boff is it was fascinating. He said, we refuse to give up the right to enrichment. Now, remember, all documented, It was documented that they were willing to do so when they were actually in the negotiating table when they thought there was a possible deal to be reached. Then they bombed them and killed the people negotiating. That would change anybody's mind.

Starting point is 00:59:07 So now they're a point where they're like, look, we're not going to give you any concessions. And that's what Iran said the last time. We're not negotiating anymore. Trump's just lying about that. We have our demands and otherwise this stays the same. One of them is, again, that we have the right to reach uranium, so we're going to hold that.

Starting point is 00:59:19 And we're still not seeking a nuclear weapon. As they've said, every single time they've met, and they get up and say they refuse to not seek nuclear weapons. they're not saying that. But what he says is they won't give up the right to enrich uranium. He goes,

Starting point is 00:59:31 and I thought to myself, you know what, my wife has the right to skydive. He literally said this. But she doesn't jump out of an airplane because she and I have an agreement. What I mean, I can't believe he actually said that.

Starting point is 00:59:43 That's got to be the dumbest thing I've ever heard in, like there's not even a valid argument you made there. I don't know what he thought he was doing there. Everyone's laughing about it for that. But the point, guys, is they do have that right.

Starting point is 00:59:53 It's the idea that for them to initiate, to acknowledge their right to do so somehow makes them a criminal is just mind-blowing. But it shows you the weakness of their position. And they're dishonest, guys. Vance has been caught lying countless times already just in the last couple days. Maybe Tucker Carlson should reflect on that. Argosy, former minister, says in intensive talks with the highest level, this is all from the 12th still, by the way.

Starting point is 01:00:16 I didn't say that. 13th is coming up next. In intensive talks with the highest level of 47 years, Iran engaged with the U.S. in good faith to end the war. I believe that. whether they're good people or not. I believe that they wanted this to end. It says,

Starting point is 01:00:28 Butwin just inches away from the actual memorandum of understanding. And it's all bad. As we all know, they encountered maximalism, shifting goalposts, blockade, right? Because they wanted it to fail. Zero lessons earned. Learned, I think he meant.

Starting point is 01:00:42 Good will beget goodwill. M&T begets M.D. Now the point is, guys, they came to the table, and then at the last minute, they started arguing things they knew they would ignore. And they came back and said, they agreed everything.

Starting point is 01:00:53 Remember Trump said that, except the nuclear? Well, according to Iran, that's not true. So it's obvious who's being misled here. Now, speaking of being misled and the partisan game, you get ridiculous people like this. This man is in our government who says, this is the Hill saying, U.S. failed to gain the trust of Iranian officials and cease talks. That's what ceasefire talks. That's what Iran said.

Starting point is 01:01:13 And this guy says Iran in the last 47 years has never negotiated in good faith. This is the best they can do. Whether you agree that they wanted to do this or not, Guys, it's on the record, as Amir points out. He goes, yes, we all remember how Iran violated the JCPOA. They did not. And then bombed the U.S. twice during negotiations. They did not.

Starting point is 01:01:33 We were all brain-dead lunatics living in an alternate universe. But this is what they do. Now, here's the question. This is a member of our government, guys. Do you think that he knows he's wrong? Because that's the scary part. Because I believe these people lie like they breathe. But I also think there's part of this that maybe he doesn't even know he's wrong.

Starting point is 01:01:50 Because this is not the let the, the, the, the, the, the, you know, the senior high level, like these are the sophomoric end of the dying empire politicians that are just regurgitated. I don't even think you know where these things come from. They're buying their own BS. They're selling the State Department narratives as if they think that's the fact. Maybe. My point is that is part of it, some of them. But funny enough of the overlap, Glenn was going at kind of like what I do with the, you know, partisans using Grock. And he says, when you turn to Grock as the arbiter of truth and it severely disappoints you by explaining to you that the truth that you denied, they called a lie, were

Starting point is 01:02:23 not what you wanted to hear. So he says, under the Iran deal, your leader withdrew from. And, you know, basically Trump broke the JCPOA. That's the reality. And he goes, this is false. Scrock, how many times did Iran violate the JCPOA and how? The joint comprehensive plan of action, the Iran deal. And it says Iran complied with the deal.

Starting point is 01:02:41 After the U.S. withdrew, that's when it increased. Because that's the fact, guys. I've said that every single time. And it was legal. And in fact, what did it give them to 60%? From literally the 3.67, up to 60%. which they reached and maintained ever since. It's insane that we can't be honest about that,

Starting point is 01:02:59 but it shows you how broken and dishonest these people are. Now, here is Eric Houdardy saying, Iran is panicking. Trump's blockade of the street. The street basically says the straight, basically, I'm sorry, I'm trying to go quick. The president ordered a naval blockade of the street of Hormuz. IRC claimed the straight is open for harmless passage of civilian vessels.

Starting point is 01:03:21 Trump is flipping the script. So you see where this is going to. Well, like you should already know because you watch this show, it was never closed. So when you're pointing to harmless passage of civilian vessels, they said that from day one. Trump and Netanyahu and the corporate media pretty much made an effort to keep that from everybody. I showed you the videos. If you watched the show, you already knew that. He repeatedly, they all said, look, we're fighting with them.

Starting point is 01:03:46 Anybody not fighting us is welcome to go through the strait. The mines, the bombing of ships, even the attacking of other ships were in the context of military, not random ships coming through the street. And these people just lie or don't know any better. The point is to frame it as the thing was already happening is somehow Trump getting a win. If you have to do that, you're not winning. That seems pretty simple.

Starting point is 01:04:08 And then Trump says 34 ships went through the straight yesterday, which would have been the 12th. By far the highest number since this foolish closure began. Yeah, the closure that wasn't in reality until you started the illegal war. And now you're pointing to 34 ships that were already able to go through the entire time. See my point?

Starting point is 01:04:25 And also realized that what was supposed to happen was that it was stuck at 15 because the U.S. demanded that. And it clearly Iran doesn't care about that. So now he's pragging about the fact that it went over the thing that Trump said was supposed to maintain. I just think this is hilarious.

Starting point is 01:04:38 This guy is spinning out. Robert Barnes, who was once very supportive of Trump, is saying, and this is Jack Posobic, they went kind of back and forth. He says there is no ceasefire violation. The U.S. Navy is sailing peacefully through the international waterway. Well, we went over this already, guys.

Starting point is 01:04:52 No, it's not. The reality is obvious. There is clearly, as we'll show you, international waters and regional waters. Look at those two lines, how they connect. See that? What that means is everything on this side's Omanian territory waters. Everything on that side is Iranian territory waters.

Starting point is 01:05:09 So there is no way to get through this straight without going into one of those territorial waters. That's the reality. So for them to claim that them blocking this off, whether with Oman or with not or in their own location or not, ultimately is somehow, a crime, it is not. Now here, he says, FYI, and this is Robert Barnes, the lawyer, the straight is territorial waters, not international.

Starting point is 01:05:33 That is the fact. It's very easy to prove, but people like Jack are just dishonest, guys. They lie for the team. And he says, this is Jack following up with him, saying, Grock, explain to Barnes, what international transit passage is. Now, here's what's funny. Oh, I shouldn't see it. That's so funny. So just be clear. I didn't read what the response was. He didn't say, is this the case? He just said, Grock, explain what that thing is. And then Grock goes, this is what that thing is. And he goes, oh, I told you. Okay, but that's not what, it's not what we're talking about. And it's just funny. He says, does Jack realize he's condemning Trump's blockades in Venezuela, Cuba, and now threatened to Iran is illegal? Like, so the point is

Starting point is 01:06:11 consistency of logic here or the law. If you're claiming that this is a problem, which is not international waters, well, then that, then that should call into an issue what Trump is doing over here in Venezuela or all the other locations where they do the same thing in territorial It's just, it's painful. Or international, by the way. They don't follow the law anywhere. And here is Robert Barnes also saying, sorry, he says,

Starting point is 01:06:34 imagine people saying a country should be destroyed if they interfere with global shipping and not realizing the country that does that more than anyone is the United States. I'm glad to see him calling these things out. Now, the next order comes out and makes a point about the lines that were put down. And I think this is important to think about,

Starting point is 01:06:52 because we just talked about this and when they were saying, they agreed to all of them except the nuclear, right? Is that what Trump kept saying? Well, let's look at that. It's just, you guys, it's so easy to see that he's lying to you. And by the way, Nick's order is constantly wrong, like more often than not. And I've used this because I want to point to the fact that he's pointing to this as if it's reasonable.

Starting point is 01:07:11 That's the point and then the response. But I check this myself. These are the actual demands. I would never use Nick's order as a source of information. The point is he says the, now whether or not he's accurate, the point is just that he is, you know, not a good source of information. But he goes, just in, the red lines J.D. Vance offered before leaving. Very reasonable, he says. Permanently halt uranium enrichment. Oh, guess what? They agreed to that before you started the war. Okay. Now they're not, though. You see, that's the different. Number two,

Starting point is 01:07:38 fully dismantle the major nuclear enrichment facilities. Okay, they agreed to that before you started bombing them. All in this article, yet again, watch for yourself, and this is roundly upheld by everybody else in the room. Okay. Remove all highly enriched uranium stockpiles. Same point. They agreed to that. Number four, accept a comprehensive regional peace, security, and de-escalation agreement that includes guarantees involving neighboring allies. That's what Iran was asking for. So you may even argue they agree to that in this last discussion. Immediately, number five, immediately cease all financial military and material support for terrorist proxy groups, Hamas, Hasbullahouthis. That's not going to happen. One, because they're not doing that, but they're allies with these elements. And for crying out loud,

Starting point is 01:08:18 Israel has been proven to have been funding Amas. This is just such a broken reality. This is them trying to stop them from having allies to support their agenda. Houthis, Hezbollah, Hamas, almost every one of these, in, you know, at least, I mean, each three of them particularly are resistance movements against apartheid occupation, authoritarianism. Number six, fully open the straight of Ramos. Yeah, it already was. So out of the last, what, four out of six, we're already in the reality before it started. So even if they end up with this, that means they just got what they started with.

Starting point is 01:08:50 But Nick goes, yay! And even Health Ranger says, reasonable to whom? certainly not Iran. Why should the U.S. have the right to determine which countries to develop nuclear weapons self-defense?

Starting point is 01:08:59 Exactly. Whether or not you think bad guy, it's the law that matters, guys. Now, I'll finish with this for time. The Hormuz letter put this out, and it says, watch. The Iran has released the footage of yesterday's naval ship

Starting point is 01:09:13 confronting the U.S. ships in the Strait of Ramos. Now, we pointed to this, right? They basically said, you have 30 minutes to turn back, but I hadn't been able to see whether or not they actually went through. But what we heard

Starting point is 01:09:23 was they went through and they did it. But here's what this was funny. Technically, I didn't even think about this. So this is clear. This has been reported. There's very footage of it, right? There are Iranian ships out there, right? So wait a minute.

Starting point is 01:09:34 Didn't Trump keep, they tell us that they destroyed every ship like 75 times? Well, there's an Iranian ship. So I guess that's the lie. Well, you already knew if you're not ridiculous. But here's the thing. Trump's masterclass. I'm telling you, it's everywhere.

Starting point is 01:09:47 Trump just surged two destroyers through the straight to prove international carriers. The path is clear. It didn't happen, guys. But that's what you get from these ridiculous partisans that scream what Trump says. But see, this is what Trump posted. Iran's Navy is laying at the bottom of the sea, completely obliterated, 158 ships come right back to the straight, the ships going through. Wow, now it's 158 completely obliterated on the 13th, but there's ships out there today. So that's pretty confounding.

Starting point is 01:10:13 Well, let's go through this really quickly. I tried to look for the compilation. I couldn't find it. Here he is on this clip saying, their army is gone. Their Navy is gone. They have 32 ships and they're at the bottom of the ocean. Oh, well, okay. well, that went to 158?

Starting point is 01:10:25 That's crazy. Okay, here he is on March 20th. We're doing extremely well. They had a Navy two weeks ago. All over the bottom of the sea. 58 ships. Guys, you just have to laugh at how stupid this is. This guy's ridiculous.

Starting point is 01:10:40 And back to the naval ship. As I said, it looks like we're correct. They lied again. Here's what, well, first of all, realize that the argument that claims they went through the ships, or, excuse me, went through the straight, comes from, you guessed it, Barack Ravid, And Axios.

Starting point is 01:10:55 It's like a joke. It's like they're laughing at you. And that's the only source, guys. It's right here. Axios reporter Ravid disputed Iran who claimed they turned around. The point, it says up here that basically the only source Wall Street Journal, I'm trying to go quick. Axios, citing a U.S. official reported that they did strut across the street. Everybody else said no.

Starting point is 01:11:19 And Barack Ravid has been caught lying about the ceasefire stuff countless times already. So, Bloomberg. word and it says the two Navy destroyers transited the straight on Saturday laying the ground laying the ground for the start of a mine clearing operation said the U.S. government. There are no mines out there. There's been traffic flooding through this like I keep showing you every time. They're lying about that.

Starting point is 01:11:41 Now they could and they have, but as far as I could tell, they lied about this. And Trump said they, remember they turned into we're passing through to we were collecting all the mines, then it turned into Iran can't find them all. Iran denied all this. And it didn't happen based on every. piece of evidence we have. But it says the USS Frank E. Peterson and USS Michael Murphy transited the Strait of Hermuz and operated the Arabian Gulf Sentcom said in a post

Starting point is 01:12:04 to Twitter. And it says today we begin the process of establishing the new passage and we share the same thing. We're all hyping what didn't happen. The country has sporadically attacked ships in around the Persian Gulf, but that's not true. The sporadic tax they're talking about are the attacks on military ships in two locations I can find. Every other tanker that was bombed was the U.S. and Israel. And then it says, and may, may have laid minds

Starting point is 01:12:25 and a tourist shipowner. Way to keep the narrative going to scare people from passing through the strait. Now it says several U.S. Navy ships crossed her moose on Saturday in an operation that wasn't coordinated with Iran. Axios reporter said, just to reiterate it there. And then it says, citing the U.S. official

Starting point is 01:12:39 that it didn't identify. Great news. However, it says, a regional intelligence official said that two U.S. Navy class destroyers, Burt, Burt class, or Arla, Burt class destroyers that attempted to transit the strait the strait of or moose on Saturday were forced to turn back after encountering threats from the Iran's Islamic

Starting point is 01:12:56 Revolutionary Guard, which also launched UAVs in the direction of the vessel. Iran's semi-official forest news agency also reported earlier in the nation's armed forces monitored a U.S. destroyer seen moving from the strait and conveyed this to the U.S. Pakistani mediators. The U.S. vessel returned from the strait after Tehran warned that it would be targeted. Now, usually we have to understand, guys, these things can be tracked. This is why Trump and his eight to 20 tankers of oil that they can. gave them. I mean, did we notice a difference in the oil markets? Was there any kind of a sale? They lied to you. I don't know you guys already know that, but this is a lot or somebody lied to

Starting point is 01:13:30 Trump. I'm not sure which one thing makes more sense. But there's also, they claim is an unverified, which is fair video that contradicts the fact that they went through the straight. But it's just, it's so obvious. But here is the U.S. government just telling you they went to the straight and cleared minds, apparently, even though the later story was that we couldn't find it or that Iran couldn't find it. But to finish up in general, and this is pretty quick and really, I'll go into this more in the next show in general, but here's Trump saying as of today, if any of these ships come anywhere close to our blockade, they'll be eliminated immediately. And his point that he reiterated more than once early was that all or nothing, right?

Starting point is 01:14:08 And that was what worried me is it was basically a complete shutdown. But here's what they said in the post from the CENTCOM. The blockade will be enforced impartially against vessels of all nations entering and departing Iranian ports. So quite a bit different than whether or not it was an entire shutdown, but it's still. feels like it's effectively causing the same outcome, whether the narrative changed or not. Now, as she jokes, somehow not The Onion, the title is, why Trump is threatening to block a straight that Iran is already blockading, which they're kind of not, really. It was more of just a narrative control and the U.S. and Israel threatening, you know,

Starting point is 01:14:39 but under the day, it's just to go to the point, I think, in effect, you are creating the very closure of the strait that you claimed you were fighting to stop, even though it was not closed to anyone but those fighting Iran. And this is despite the fact that it was open before you initiated this bumbling illegal war. Or wait, is it not a war still? So stupid. Well, here is J.D. Vance, Tuesday, saying that Iran's blockade in the straight, even though they weren't doing that was economic terrorism. But it's okay now that Trump does it.

Starting point is 01:15:13 Just insane. Sad, guys. Sad. Now, I'll probably just wrap there for the most part. The gist of what I wanted to get into. China is saying. Don't stop us through the straight or there'll be problems. And I'm of the mind that they're not going to, right?

Starting point is 01:15:27 Or the idea that he's saying, if China gives weapons to Iran, there'll be problems. Yeah, I doubt that. This is bluster, in my opinion. On top of that, Iran's ambassadors saying India and him had good talks in regard to the straight. And so it seems like people are generally, you know, more than just Iranian allies. I think over that two days, we're going to see where this really goes. Iran denies charging toll for Indian tankers. Again, guys, they're lying about what's going on.

Starting point is 01:15:51 What they're saying is, no, they've been going through. We can let them go through with no tolls. Now, they could be lying, too, by the way. But what I think generally is it about trying to create the idea that everything's restricted and we have to do what Trump wants or, you know, and it's just never been the case. Effectively, Trump is the one creating that restriction or Trump and Israel. But again, Stephen points out, under the rules-based order, the Iran toll is bad because it's international waters, but the U.S. toll is good because, well, because.

Starting point is 01:16:15 Right. This one, I can't play for you because I don't know, I can't bring it up, but he basically just makes a fool of himself as usual. And then guess what? Breaking six hours ago. Oh, wait. This is a new update on this. Oh, okay.

Starting point is 01:16:32 Well, so this looks like it's contradicting that. But see, this is where it's really hard to know today. Because this keeps happening where he'll say one thing or you'll get a report about one thing. They don't lie about something else. So let's just, we'll give you both of these and we can consider going forward tomorrow and will probably flesh out as usual. It said that Trump was from the overall. All right.

Starting point is 01:16:50 Yeah. Trump said that he's setting a two. a new two-week deadline for Iran to make a deal, which is what he's done like 15 times already. But it won't be pleasant if Iran doesn't agree by the 27th. So this is simply saying, I'll leave that link for you, saying that basically that he didn't set the date,

Starting point is 01:17:06 but he did speak about the ceasefire, but did not set a new date to 27th. Okay, but either way, the idea that this went from, you better not or you're all going to die, to like, well, okay, let's do it one more time. Well, I said, just kind of joking. Seriously, though, guys.

Starting point is 01:17:21 This is the last final, all or nothing, two-week deadline, and if you do not let Trump claim, he somehow won this war, more than any war has ever been won in the history of war being won, he will not hesitate to give you another two-week deadline. But then, but then, you know, it's just the same game over and over and over and it just keeps happening. But of course, you get the Axios article, the door is not closed, mediators rush to revive the U.S. talks. I just don't get it. And of course, Ron points out, you know, right before the market's open for the weekend, like clockwork. He's right. Now, we know that Barack Ravid, I'll skip that. Israel is bombing Lebanon.

Starting point is 01:17:56 37,000 homes, 2,000 people killed. It doesn't matter in anybody, it seems, who has an ability to do anything about it. Unifil, literally being bombed by Israel, the United States, constantly, Mohammed Safa's pointing out that they're highlighting this, a place to size of New York City or New York State, that they're going to seize from Lebanon, openly telling you they're doing this. The world doesn't seem to care. Lastly, I find this, I just can't believe this. And she's right, this is the case.

Starting point is 01:18:27 Apple has literally ethnically cleansed the map of Lebanon, at least in the location, by the way, that just so happens to be exactly what Israel wants to take. Guys, if you've ever seen a better piece of evidence of what's really going on, it's right in front of you. Okay, because what Apple is now doing is quite literally wiping the map clean for what Israel's about to change to their own settlements. And of course, what we point out, as White Reed points out, that they discussed this already, that Apple acquired a $2 billion startup funded by Israeli spies that analyzes your biometrics. And this is one example of more overlap.

Starting point is 01:19:04 Oh, and by the way, they're still bombing Somalia in case that matters to anybody. That happens constantly, too, because, you know, peace president. And every single, you know, this is just the Lebanon village that was completely destroyed. You know, but it's okay because Israel's fighting for freedom, apparently. But anyway, guys, you know, all the jokes aside and facetiousness, you know, You know, it's just, it's very clear what's happening. I just hope we can remain skeptical, right? Critical, question everything.

Starting point is 01:19:26 Consider what's happening because we're being lied to. I think that's very obvious. We'll follow up. I'm sure there's more to get to, guys, but I think it's pretty clear that they're failing in this. And that this is either an effort to kind of just use a narrative that makes it feel like they didn't lose, or maybe this genuinely is the plan. And even then, I would argue they're sort of failing and accomplishing that plan.

Starting point is 01:19:46 So, as usual, do your own research. Come to your own conclusions about it, guys. that's what this is all about. Thank you for tuning in. I love you all. As always, question everything. Come to your own conclusions. Stay vigilant.

The Last American Vagabond - Trump's Blockade: Another Bluster Or The Real Agenda?

There aren't comments yet for this episode. Click on any sentence in the transcript to leave a comment.