The Last American Vagabond - Twitter’s Free Speech Illusion Finally Shatters & Trump Refuses To Admit He Lost The War With Iran

Starting point is 00:00:00 It starts with a simple question and ends in objective reality. Through our journey from there to here, we find one another and ourselves. And as the next 24 hours breaks free from our last, we gaze onward in reflection of the day. Thank you, welcome to the daily wrap-up. Monday, September 7th, 2026, thank you for joining me today. I thought I'd play the song that Greg wrote for The Last American Vagabond from a Higher Side chat. It's a wonderful person, really great. You know, you come across people in this, in this field that are genuine, real people,

Starting point is 00:00:56 whether you agree on things or not. We happen to share a lot of similar opinions. We disagree on some, but just a good person who respects other people's opinions. who is interested in what they're, you know, the logic of why they see things the way they do, you know, somebody who is insight and is intelligent, you know, anybody out there in the world that is, you know, attacking people for hanging the wrong idea, even if in essence that's what ultimately is correct, like attacking people for feeling and seeing things a different way, they're not a smart person.

Starting point is 00:01:24 I don't care how intelligent you think they are. There's either a blind spot or a deliberate amount of dishonesty out there. I just want to point that out because I was just listening to that song, you know, and think Greg is a good person and I figured we'd point that out. I also want to start today by letting you guys know very quickly before we get into even introducing things. I've been keeping a few of you, you know, some of the community up to date on what's going on with my father. I just, you know, again, it's a personal note and I don't necessarily get into the personal site here, but because I said before I was talking about this in the context of the medical conversation

Starting point is 00:01:52 and what people went through during COVID-19, and I wanted to keep you abreast of this. Sadly, he's back in hospital. And at the moment, I just, I don't even want to get into it because it gets very frustrating for me. and it's very emotional and it's difficult. The crazy reality of this is that they've still yet to even figure out what's causing all this to quickly wrap up the point. They went through all these different problems, a surgery already, to circumvent a blockage, pancreatitis is what they believe it is now.

Starting point is 00:02:19 But all this time they've been denying that. We believe it's an immune connection and they refuse to even try to figure that out. No efforts of any kind medication or natural to bring down inflammation. I find that insane. And on top of that now where we're at, they're basically kind of. kind of waiting to see. He started to build up with fluid again. They'd bring him back in exactly what we were worried would happen if they did what they did the first time. And now he's back in the hospital and get this. We're at a point now where they're still pushing another surgery

Starting point is 00:02:45 without even knowing what's going on, without trying what else might be, you know, other pathways that might find out what it is or might, you know, point to something that could be alleviated with a steroid, for example, or any other direction. And still they haven't looked in further. And now you have a cardiologist suggesting they gave him a pacemaker, just in case, before the first, the next second surgery because his heart might be a problem with the next surgery before we even figure out what's going on. Our system is broken, guys. And whether he needs, which he has, he has issues with his heart, but it's not, it's been

Starting point is 00:03:15 something they've discussed. Every doctor before this has been looking at the same information. And it just feels wrong to me. And at the end of the day, even if he needs something in that direction, it feels, you know, again, I didn't want to get into it all now. The point is that this system is just so completely skewed in the direction of what benefits it. I'm not saying the individuals doing this, no, they're doing that.

Starting point is 00:03:33 But it's just how do you fight something like this? You know, I'm so conflicted about what I do. Do I pressure? Because he wants to go along with what they think. He has reverence for their position. And to a degree, you know, you should. I mean, these people do know what they know, meaning that, you know, they're experts in what they're taught to know.

Starting point is 00:03:52 And that's not always the right thing, you understand. But they do know some of the, you know, the point is there's a level there. But it's where do I stop pushing, you know? Do I, anyway. So the end of the day, that's what I'm dealing with. There's a lot going on in the background. Just thank you for your patience and your support. I have some amazing support out there from you guys.

Starting point is 00:04:08 It just means a lot to me. So on that note, let's get into the show today. Very generally, the focus today is propaganda. You know, kind of recently we talked about artificial, false, kind of in a larger way. That's a part of it today, too. But specifically under the, you know, obviously Twitter and censorship, you'll see, if you haven't seen these two main stories, let's just put it this way. By the way, if this story today is what makes you suddenly realize that they're

Starting point is 00:04:32 censoring and there's don't believe in free speech. I don't know what you've been paying attention. There's been 50 similar stories like this since he's taken over this platform that show you, you know, you can debate whether it's worse than before. I believe it's dramatically worse just in a very different way. If you want to talk about blunt censorship, maybe it's less. It's hard to even tell. But there's still clearly a lot of censorship right now, but I don't believe it's about

Starting point is 00:04:56 censorship anymore. That's a part of it. But it's about molding ideas and controlling the flow of conversations. censorship was all they had before. Now they've got AI algorithms, fake commentators, paid, manipulated, lying commentators, you know, just like in, and I mean, in the age of AI, that stuff gets ridiculous. So I want to talk about that specifically with these major stories, but the bigger point about just what all that's for, it's not just about money as much as that's a part of it always.

Starting point is 00:05:21 It's not just about political agendas, which is always a part of it. There's something much larger of how they're trying to mold what all of this is right now. And you know my opinions. I don't need to always insert it, but I do believe there's a larger agenda there. And I'll make points to, you know, you can connect with. But I think there's about something transitioning. All of this, society. Ian Davis had a great article for a limited hangout.

Starting point is 00:05:42 I'm planning to bring it in, but it's such a beast of an article. And I want to make sure we give it attention. I might even reach out and have him come on if he's free. But it's simply about the idea of the, like the larger point we're discussing about the network state agenda. But as he highlights in this, a great article. It's part four, actually, the Praxians he's discussing. it's a global thing.

Starting point is 00:06:01 It's not just about one territory, one kind of libertarian game, or, you know, agenda, which or rather, you know, in this, they frame it as libertarians kind of trying what their little experiment doing. It's not what it is. It's a lie. That's how they're framing it to trick people like they did with feigning towards Massey or whatever else they're doing. The point, though, is it's a global thing that's happening about transitioning everybody

Starting point is 00:06:21 into the new control structure. It's very clear, I think. But so that is what I want to highlight in regard to how the censorship, and the platform part of it is being applied to all of this. But in a larger sense as well, kind of the way that they're corralling us with the AI, the way they're censoring people on certain conversations, and dovetailing that with the flock part of the conversation,

Starting point is 00:06:43 because that's part of the same, you'll see as we go through it. You've probably seen both, by the way. Parody Jeff being censored, flock CEO with people pointing out what he just did. We'll get into it and getting censored for it. It's wild. And I want to talk about, of course,

Starting point is 00:06:57 of the mainstream alternative media trying to gaslight to hide certain parts of this, but largely just the transition of what Trump is doing and overlapping that with Iran and all of this shifting together. And I do think it kind of largely connects today like we do so often. I want to start with one point that I think sets a tone. And it's specifically about, and this is interesting because I remember having this conversation about the map, the inaccuracies of the maps we still use to teach children. And I'm talking like pretty like important geographical in,

Starting point is 00:07:27 inaccuracies for i mean well i'll get into it but it's like it's a very easily proven thing and i've talked about this before i remember talking about this i mean even before i think i did this work and finally going like why wouldn't that be an easy thing to do seeing as how it's because this you know even before i'm like thinking oh is there other agendas as there's some kind of a financial reason you know even from people who make the maps to the fact that the map itself may change geographical things that cause financial changes it's interesting and i'm thinking well that doesn't make sense. Why wouldn't they just do it? It's right. It's accurate. And so coming to today, you'll find in the, recently, there was a vote in the UN about going to use the new maps.

Starting point is 00:08:05 And let's be clear about this. There's no debate about what's accurate. These are accurate. The newer ones are provably more accurate. The older ones are, well, I mean, I'll get into the dispute about rules to get into right now, about the idea of how these things are the, basically the globe being folded around the map. They argue causes these things to change. I don't, I don't agree with that. I think the point is, you have a map and you can easily make the dimensions accurate regardless, my opinion. But so the idea is that the UN voted on this and only one country voted no. And that's the United States. I thought, how interesting is this? Not only because I'm wondering what their agenda is around this.

Starting point is 00:08:45 And maybe it's just because I've talked about the Trump administration are essentially the people that were played by the government that are not running the government, if that makes sense to you. And I'll try to make that point again in a minute. whereas now they are of the mind that this is some kind of woke ideological thing and it's not. Even if that is, and we know those things exist,

Starting point is 00:09:02 that maybe they actually believe that, which I'll get into. Or maybe it's just because they have a reason financially or control or something other that drives them to hide this. But what I find interesting is the speaking point, the larger point is that this demonstrates this like post-truth world,

Starting point is 00:09:20 they discussed in Bilderberg. Right, the idea of where we can forcefully stop the awareness of what the reality is because of fill in the blank. And it just seems like such an interesting point. Now, I thought I had this up, actually. But here's the actual DD Geopolitics post that brought this to my attention. America was the only country to vote against making world maps more geographically accurate.

Starting point is 00:09:42 And I urge you to look further into this in case you're, it's not, you're going to get morons on Twitter right now that are trying to convince you that it's a left wing trick or something. Or it's easy and has been going on for years to see that this is accurate. And again, I mean, question it. Maybe that's all, you know, as always, we could always be missing something. But the facts are clear if you look at the full body of it and these are more accurate and the old ones are not. Now, it says the UN voted 164 to 1 to encourage the use of what are called equal earth projections. That's the newer one, which corrects the massive size distortions created by the centuries old, what's called the, I think it's the Mercator map. I could be mispronouncing that. The United States cast the sole vote against it, dismissing the effort as a, quote, radical ideological pride. project. Radical ideological project to use the maps that are accurate versus the ones that are

Starting point is 00:10:30 not. Explain that. Other than either that they actually think that and are confused or misled or that they are framing it that way to hide something else. Six countries abstained. There's a couple points in there. They're interesting. The Ukraine one is interesting. We'll point out in a second. Why the rest of them did? I can't really discern yet. Or I didn't see their comments about it. This from the country currently producing its own government maps featuring names like the Gulf of America. And I don't even want to, I mean, I guess I'll briefly point to the many different AI slop things he's doing lately. But to get into how many weird things he posted over the last couple of days would take half an hour. And it's wild, ridiculous things. Half of them I think are actually

Starting point is 00:11:09 jokes. And not even, I don't even want to call it jokes. It's cover for the fact that he was posting things he means or believes in or is kind of a fake half troll, but he really is going to do it. And then he bombs the whole thing with 70 different things of one making it look like the shape of Trump's head. And that's not real, guys, obviously. But the point is, I believe that's to cover the fact that most of this speaks to something that is his actual desire. Like Greenland was a troll until it was not. Now, realize, as much as you want to still pretend like the whole Greenland thing, even though it's still happening, he's still posting maps. We'll get into that North American Union guys with the Greenland and Canada part.

Starting point is 00:11:45 But people still pretend like he's trolling everybody. Guys, they've tried to push forward legislation. They've literally had like, I mean, look what's going on with Canada right now. it's obvious this is not just a joke. So my point would be that whether you think it's a joke or not, clearly there are some of it, something behind it. But it says apparently redrawing maps to rename things after America

Starting point is 00:12:03 perfectly reasonable. Just, you know, it's a joke because it's ridiculous what he's doing. And I don't believe it's all a joke. Redrawing maps to make the countries their actual relative sizes, radical ideology. What an interesting point, right? So this used to stand back and go, okay, what is actually radical, you know,

Starting point is 00:12:19 whatever they're framing these things at? woke, whatever, right? What is that? Is it whatever they point to? Is Maga, whatever Trump says that day as he keeps doing? No, you all know that. You guys don't have a definition of your minds of what you think woke is or whatever. So when they do this, ask yourself, why am I going along with that? Is that woke? And don't just take it because they said so. What's woke about it? It's accurate. Is it only woke because there's Democrats that are claiming we should do that? And that's the dumbest argument ever. Because there's plenty of Republicans that do things every day that are aligned with what the Democrats do. It's just frustrating. So I don't know for sure what the driving forces. I'm curious to find out if anybody has any more inside. This is from the fourth. The UN General Assembly on Friday backed your resolution calling for a shift away from the traditional Mercator projection of the map of the world with the U.S. opposing the measure alone.

Starting point is 00:13:06 The resolution put forward by Togo, you know, I forgot to look that up last time I brought this out. I believe it's Togo, or Tago. Let me know in the chat, country. And backed by the African Union, passed with 164 votes in favor, six, abstentions and a single vote against by the United States. The text encourages UN member states. Now remember, it's the UN, so in many cases, despite very specific parts of this,

Starting point is 00:13:30 it's all, you know, there's no teeth to it largely. The encourages UN member states, international organizations and others to promote maps that are more accurately to pick the relative size of continents, particularly Africa. Simple. And it's not like you have, they're encouraging use the map that's accurate. That's it. Why you would oppose that? I just, it's, there's, again, I don't want to say it for a third time.

Starting point is 00:13:51 I mean, you know, either there's an agenda there or that they're actually believing this is a woke agenda. The Mercator projection developed in the 16th century and still widely used distorts the size of land masses, particularly those closer to the polls, making Africa appear smaller relative to regions, including Europe and North America. So simply put, if you want to make this as small and petty as you can, and it, which by the way is not a not a bad guess to level at Trump these days. because it seems everything is guided by his personal petty and his hubris and his perception is that if you want to if you want to make this as simple as possible maybe you don't want America till you know north America to look smaller than it was or maybe you don't want Africa to appear like it's larger that would be the dumbest reason in this conversation but look at what we're dealing with today it very well could just be that he thinks that makes America look

Starting point is 00:14:41 weak and that means him right now and he feels weak and so he strikes out who knows frankly I believe it's more than that. I'm getting a sense of, like, I was trying to think about what it would change. Like, if you look at these maps, like the difference of like this, so that, you know, these flat maps versus the ones they've curved. And basically the simple point is that Africa looks, it's accurate size, which makes the other countries look smaller. So, oh, here's a good overlap.

Starting point is 00:15:06 Like here, see the difference right here? Basically, what you can see is it dramatically increases the size of the other nations and it makes Africa look small. Now, I'm trying to think of what would have changed. Is there some kind of a potential, I couldn't think of anything. But maybe there's a financial connection to the geographical lines that are being drawn here or something different like that. If you have a thought, let me know.

Starting point is 00:15:29 But I just thought it was pretty telling that there was such a pushback. And it says the projection developed in the 16th century still widely used, which it teaches our children. Inaccurate, by the way, distorts the size of the landmasses, particularly those close to the polls. It says, the persistence, quote, of these distortions and maps has caused throughout time significant consequences. So at least they think so.

Starting point is 00:15:49 That's to go to go's foreign minister. They believe there's severe consequences. It has contributed to symbolically minimizing the size of Africa. You know, you could argue that's like, look, if Trump is concerned about making North America look smaller right now, then it wouldn't be small, you know, a ridiculous argument for them to feel like it, you know, it's the same thing in reverse, right? So for them to argue some kind of a woke thing for them to care that their country look small than it is. Well, same thing in reverse for Trump. I'm not saying that's exactly what he

Starting point is 00:16:17 thinks, but it goes both ways, right? Accuracy should matter, obviously. An unbalanced view of global geography. I mean, these things obviously matter. And it says the U.S., which voted against the resolution, slammed the text as an ideological exercise that it said undermine UN's credibility. Oh, that's what undermines it. Is it? This initiative is presented as an anodyne effort to update cardiographic proportions, said Mike Wals. You know, the guy who got caught using an Israeli app to archive conversations in the White House. And it got shoved away from the inner circle to be an ambassador.

Starting point is 00:16:51 And now speaks out and says, that's a woke thing. Because the United States clearly sees it cannot be separated from the much larger and more radical ideology projected project it belongs to, the U.N. So accuracy of the countries is radical ideology. On top of that, he goes on to say, well, it says Washington criticized the General Assembly for debating. Map projects from the 16th century, and their role in promoting reparations and cognitive justice, which, okay, that's not the second, the statements on top of that are the way they try to fold it in.

Starting point is 00:17:21 We're talking about whether the map is used or not. Simple. So focusing on the fact that maps are incorrect is not important for a global conversation. I mean, it's weird the way they try to minimize this. And it says resolutions like this one, Mike Wall says, and the ideological agenda they promote. Please fill me in. are barnacles on our work here. Oh, you mean the work of sabotaging the ongoing investigation of the genocide you guys support?

Starting point is 00:17:47 And the reason, he says, this institution is losing its credibility. Oh, is that it? Or is it they're failing to do anything about the ongoing murderous genocides you guys are carrying out in multiple countries? And that everybody sees that the actual international enforcement or whatever we call it, the international body or the international community, doesn't even have the ability to do what it's always claimed it's there to do. So for those of us that have been going, we don't need global bodies

Starting point is 00:18:11 to dictate global agendas, right? Like all of us who talk about, you know, the ones that actually care about globalism, not the ones that feigned to care until suddenly they're supporting the team that do it. The point would be, we don't want these things, right?

Starting point is 00:18:23 But now that they're in effect here, it's the only thing that's able to call out the ongoing thing. So what we're effectively showing is that they're not there for that purpose. So that's why we should continue to get away from the way this. The difference is they want you to rethink

Starting point is 00:18:36 that the actually talking about something that is important to understand is them showing why they're losing credibility. It's gross. It's like Mike Walls and anybody on their team standing up and calling out people for genocide. You're going to laugh in their face, aren't you? You're going to say, you're ridiculous. Clearly, you guys don't care about any of this. The bigger, I guess not the bigger.

Starting point is 00:18:56 The side point for this is to recognize, as most of you probably already have, they will use the woke, Democrat, bad guy, other narrative against anything they want you to ignore or anything they want you to attack. It's the same thing the left does to the right, guys. It says Ukraine's UN envoy, Melnik, I believe, spelled M-E-L-N-Y-K, who abstained, said Kiev could not support the resolution. It says this is really interesting to me. Now, this may be a bigger part of this than we realize.

Starting point is 00:19:26 Maybe it connects to something in the larger network state agenda conversation of territorial changes. It says depicts parts of Ukraine's territory that have been temporarily, occupied by Russia. Okay, so if you remember what they mean, they're talking about the territories that have literally chosen of their own accord to side with Russia. Crimea, Donbass, right? I mean, and again, we can debate this till we're blue in the face. The evidence is a deniable, just like you're now probably finding out, if you're new to the show. The evidence has been undeniable about what Israel's been doing, what Zionism actually is, the lies of the U.S. foreign policy. Very clear your entire life. Whether you choose to look is up to you. The point being Crimea, 99 percent, I believe, over 90

Starting point is 00:20:06 percent if I don't want to be inaccurate. Referendum, chose to leave and side with Russia. It was publicly and globally discussed. Of course, U.S. lied about it, shouted it down, like they did with anything. Bolivia is not real. Venezuela is a fake election. Lie, lie, lie, lie all over the place. Then they steal and robin of torture. It's what they do, guys. And what's crazy is I'm speaking kind of off the cuff about that's not inaccurate. Point out what I just said and point out the inaccuracies anywhere. So the point is that they're now going, wait, wait, wait, wait, you can't use the maps to depict the accurate reality of the fact that we do interesting and it says it's a flagrant violation of the charter and international law says the two groups that are ongoing continually

Starting point is 00:20:48 violating international law do you think they care about international law or do you think they care about using the term to hide or rather to get what they want from what's happening i mean ukraine is act rather the ukrainian government and the ozhov movement controlled by the outside forces we're discussing absolutely don't care about international law as they tie civilians to post and beat them to death. It's just, it's insulting to our intelligence. Mr. Melnick argued that the depiction violated principles of sovereignty and territorial integrity. Yeah, the very people that have been ethnically cleansing Donbass for decades. Guys, you can't take these people seriously. They want what they want. They don't care about the law.

Starting point is 00:21:23 Russia's annexation of Crimea was the main point he made. So, interesting story, right? At the end of the day, accurate things are being ignored by the Trump administration because it's woke. Maybe take a step back and reflect in what else they've cold woke and see whether or not those things might just be accurate. And I'm not in any way saying that woke means accurate or Democrats are better. I'm saying in the context of how this administration uses the other to hide what they want you to miss, just like the Democrats when they're in power. As they say fascist and Nazi and blah, blah, blah, and hide do the same thing. It's all a big hamster wheel, ladies and gentlemen. So what this comes down to for me is the reality that everything is illusion.

Starting point is 00:22:00 The narrative only matter. You know what we used to say a lot. Everything is fake. It's not. It's not. Nothing is real and what I used to say. Now I can't remember, actually. It went both ways that basically the whole point of them is to create a situation where nothing means anything and anything means nothing. It's or whatever. Something I used to say, right? Where there's just, you just give up.

Starting point is 00:22:20 It's sort of like a brave new world dynamic where you just kind of check out because you ultimately just are so tired of trying to decipher the insanity of what's right and what's wrong or what's true and what's not, rather. That's where I think where they're driving us. Now, funny enough, I'm going to mention this briefly when we get into the, you know, end of the latter half of the show, actually, about the North and the, American Union, which is what Trump posted about, which is exactly that picture right there. Which, you know, he's clearly battling with Canada, clearly talking about absorbing parts of the

Starting point is 00:22:44 area. So is that a troll guys? Clearly not. Now, is it a joke to make the post? Well, maybe, but he means it when he comes to happening. When it comes to actually doing it. But what I found funny is, Gray says, should I be investing in map companies? Interesting overlap, right? Not who knows, not that there's actually a connection, but it's just kind of funny that that's the false nature of what they do and that she picked up on a similar point of like, hey, maybe I should recognize that they're going to just lie about all this stuff and make an accurate map. Well, they're doing that too. Now, talking about Epstein that I want to make sure we didn't miss on this. It's, you know, it's funny to me how little people talk about this anymore. Not everybody.

Starting point is 00:23:22 All the honest people, which I think are the majority, are still talking about it, but the ones with the million fellow audiences that lie to you every day are not. And it says, Speaker, Mike Johnson on the Epstein Files vote. Remember, I recently told you in a preview show that Massey was pushing for transparency two. The Epstein Act's Transparency Act Part 2, which would essentially push them to release more, and I doubt they would do it, or released what they should have already released the first time. This is from September 4th, and he says basically calling out Massey, if you were so concerned with these, why didn't you do it before?

Starting point is 00:23:55 Do you not realize how guilty that makes Mike look? So by saying that, what you're suggesting is one, that he doesn't care about what actually comes out. Who knows, maybe? and that that means there is potentially something that could come out, but now you're not caring either. It's sort of like doing the bad thing. You know, they bomb you with white phosphorus and you bomb on the back with white phosphorus. You say, they're the evil ones.

Starting point is 00:24:16 Well, you are too. You just did the same thing. So in this back and forth, what Mike is essentially inadvertently or maybe on purpose admitting is that they don't care. Now, Massey may care, but what he's trying to suggest or push off on him is that you don't care because you would have done it earlier. Like we don't care. Well, that's why we're not doing it now.

Starting point is 00:24:34 Now, nowhere in there is the admission that we have more that we're holding back or that we're not, you know, it's interesting to me. And the bottom line is by saying that, it doesn't change the fact that we care now. We do, whether Massey's using it to benefit himself or not. If your only point is to say, Massey's just grifting to get your attention. Well, good or bad. Who cares? That's irrelevant to that we want the Epstein files out. They're just hiding desperately from this, guys.

Starting point is 00:24:58 And I think we all see that. This should have been done in a much more careful manner. And it was not. And I'm going to point out again, when the authors were asked to fix it, they said they weren't interested in doing that. Okay? Why? Because this is a raw and obvious political exercise.

Starting point is 00:25:14 Oh, is it? The raw political exercise is to try to get the information out that you're refusing to get out. Now, what he's trying to address there is the idea that Massey's bill was all damn, the victims and all these things. He's absolutely lying through his teeth. The victims support Massey. They've all been standing up and calling out Mike and Trump and everybody else in the courtroom, or rather in Congress and saying,

Starting point is 00:25:33 saying, you know, they're lying to you. They're literally standing as if they've got the support of the Epstein community. They're either the victims, the community, when they don't. They're literally calling them out by name and they stand there like they have the support of everybody. It's just gross. And that means, how do you not see this to somebody in real time covering up what we've all been calling for?

Starting point is 00:25:54 Again, I'm just going to leave you with this question. You should go ask them all. If you were so concerned about the Epstein files and protecting the victims, why didn't you do a darn thing about it for the four years of the Biden administration. All this stuff was sitting in a warehouse and nobody said a word about it. They didn't care. Yeah. And neither did you, Mike. Funny how that works out that your point goes all the way around, doesn't it? Why didn't everybody else? And it's a good question. Why didn't you, Massey? That matters. But you see what it doesn't change anything. So none of you did. Okay, now back to the point. Why are you not releasing the

Starting point is 00:26:26 files? It doesn't do what you think it does right there, Mike. All you're doing is shooting yourself in the foot just to try to make Massey look like he's doing the same as you. Like maybe that's the best they can do. Like, I'm going to make the desperation point yet again today. I think we were accurate from January. I think these people are screamingly desperate right now. They know we're all seeing through it. They know we're calling them out.

Starting point is 00:26:45 This is the best you get, I guess. And this isn't extremely, this is the next one that matters. Here's the actual post for it. Thomas Massey. He said, I'd predicted that this is on the 60, he posted this, about 1.2 million views and consistently shows you that

Starting point is 00:27:02 everybody supports him over them. Whether you should support him or not is up for you to decide. But it's obvious that he'll comment under Trump or other people and they get, I mean, I actually think largely that's why Trump does post on his platform anymore because he'll get ratioed and everybody will see it. The truth is that Massey gets way more support from people on the maggot side or whatever you want to believe that is today. I believe is the people that still continue to believe what he promised. There is a movement called MAG out there that don't support Trump anymore. That's the reality. When you talk about Trump's team and what they're doing and the blind followers, I wouldn't

Starting point is 00:27:32 call that MAGA because it's not what that was. He didn't follow through if he followed through and then anyway, you get the point. So in this case, you have Mike Johnson basically pushing back on the claim that he'll shut down Congress to cover up the Epstein file just like he did last time. And this is what he says. And this was before what just happened. This should have been done in a moment. Oh, that's not this one here.

Starting point is 00:27:56 Mr. Speaker, Thomas Massey. Mr. Speaker, Thomas Massey is now alleging that you are. are going to hold the House in recess until after the midterm elections due to the Epstein Files Transparency Act. So let me tell you how stupid Thomas Massey's comment is. If he would come to our House Republican conference meetings as we had this morning, he would have heard me say, privately, as I've said publicly, Republicans are here to work. We have a schedule, a calendar that's been out for a year. We are abiding by that calendar. I, I, we are going to work all the way through September and every day that's on the calendar so long as people like him don't stop the progress.

Starting point is 00:28:30 So that is a nonsensical statement by someone who is not participating as a full member of the Congress. And it's really sad that he doesn't. Interesting. Your reaction, Congressman. Well, I could show you a bunch of clips of things that Mike Johnson has said absolutely are positively true and then they aren't true. I'm glad to hear that he says we're going to stay here. That gives me time to get 218 signatures. We're collecting them.

Starting point is 00:29:01 We've already got dozens already. We need to get to 218. So that's good. But I heard him say, unless he stops progress. Now, what's his view of stopping progress? Progress to him is making a political statement up here every day in order to put the Republican Party ahead in the midterms, not to actually get anything done.

Starting point is 00:29:24 So if I start making real progress and they don't see a political, advantage from their fake messaging bills, he may say that I've stopped their kind of progress, and he could call it off. He also might be talking about other members of Congress who would be voting to take down rules. Yeah, and the simple point you already get, I'm sure, which is that Mike Johnson lied, obviously, and that ultimately Massey's simply pointing out that, you know, the point, you know, he said a lot of things in the past that ultimately don't come to, true, to come to, you know, come to fruition. And so right now, what he screamed in this was that Massey's wrong. He's lying about, you know, progress. Well, Transparency Act 2 is clearly

Starting point is 00:30:08 going to be something that Mike argues will hurt the progress. And so what happened? Of course, you already know, don't you? We're catching up a little bit today. This is as of the fourth, the U.S. House will be in session only four full days from January 24th to November 8th. that's a hundred paid days off versus four full working days plus four travel half days. Meanwhile, for the other story you might have heard, meanwhile, Trump says you have too many holidays. Too many non-working holidays in America. It's costing the country billions of dollars. Go work more as you're struggling even worse than you ever have in your life.

Starting point is 00:30:42 These people couldn't care less about you. I'm just sad that took so people so long to see that in the Trump's, just like you saw it in the Bidens or the Obama's or the Bushes. it's the same, same, same thing. So the point, obviously, that they, you know, Mike was a liar is the point. Now, on the Epstein point in general, you might have seen this already. This is a clip from Al Jazeera. To think about what they're hiding and the reality of like the Zora Ranch Point we brought up or plenty of other examples and they act like this is over, right?

Starting point is 00:31:11 This is John Fitzgerald Kennedy Jr. posted this. FBI knew the entire Petro Network in 2009 and buried it to protect the demons. That's what he wrote. Epstein's own butler you've heard this story walks into the FBI or basically he thought it was a lawyer walks into a sting that was the FBI to sell the full client list here's what he said and you tell me that right now we've nothing there's nothing to go on when this guy's talking about naked people and you and you know pictures and the black book of Epstein all the horrible things he's doing that's a whole bunch of evidence right there they tell us there's no victims they never trafficked somebody to somebody

Starting point is 00:31:47 as Cash Patel will tell you. These people are monsters what they're doing, and they know what they're doing, guys. Thank you. Come on that. We're here on it. Yeah, good, yeah.

Starting point is 00:31:57 Yeah, the documents, who created this book? I have it there. I know, I know, from my computer, but just, it's a power failure. He was very organized,

Starting point is 00:32:07 so I was supposed to make this through every plane and every place. Just there's, they want to put water. I thought so that to keep it full, because they used to,

Starting point is 00:32:18 Now look like this, just like that. What kind of pictures? Naked girls from Sweden, from Romania, with Czechoslovakia, from Brazil, from all... All the miners, all young girls? Very young. Very young. Like when you say very young, young, every other people? 16, 17, the teenagers, they have places also.

Starting point is 00:32:37 Younger, younger than that, though? Yeah, yeah. And there used to go out to comedy shops or ice cream parts or movies, a lot of movies. Because it is. Correct. Because they were babies. Children. Movies and ice cream.

Starting point is 00:32:56 Imagine having all this evidence and, you know, I mean, all the incredible amount of evidence that the very Trump administration, the cashes and Dan Bongino's and Benny Johnson's is all out there. We're screaming has to come out because it shows everything and it's going to bring down the Democrats. Oh, never mind, Epstein who? Trump involved? What? Move on.

Starting point is 00:33:18 Ice cream. and concrete and movies from the record that they will stay even if you the rest of saying there's a same person. His late name is a very powerful lady from England. She would go to the former East, Eastern countries in Europe and find Earthways. And I knew that because I went with my wife. They used to have a computer so powerful.

Starting point is 00:33:43 They used to have a water radiator to cool the computer because they used to download pictures like that so fast. She has nice dress. She has to be some best. You saw that stuff on the computer, pictures of the girls? I did stuff like that. Yeah, I testify that.

Starting point is 00:34:00 I could, he can testify to that. Funny. Cash Mattel wants you to believe there's nothing. There's no there there. They have sense removed video from their website, the FBI. What I said is that they posted it without blurring the agent's face. My gut would tell me they probably did that on purpose. so they could have a justification to remove it.

Starting point is 00:34:38 Why wouldn't they just blur it and put it back? I mean, that's how they operate. Just just a feeling, right? But think about what we're dealing with. That this is, these are the kind of people that we're dealing with. Here's what Muhammad Safa had to say, formerly from the United Nations. He says, remember when the Panama Papers came out. It revealed that all rich people in the world are part at, well, again, Panama Papers, remember, were selectively shown.

Starting point is 00:35:02 It involved all those usual suspects we're talking about, too. But it was a very select showing of the other. right, the certain countries we want you to think are the bad ones, while the U.S. and Israel and all the rest, the U.K., were absolutely involved in this. The Panaw papers came out, revealed that all rich people in the world are part of an enormous criminal network to dodge taxes and hoard stolen wealth in offshore accounts. And the journalists who reported that was murdered in a car bomb. And no one was held accountable. And literally nothing happened. Remember that there are three million files of documented evidence about powerful men and women who raped, cannibalized,

Starting point is 00:35:34 trafficked, filmed, terrorized, tortured, hunted, and murdered. 13, 14, 15-year-old children. And no one was held accountable and literally nothing happened. Remember that the United States literally kidnapped a sitting president of a foreign country and his wife and they've been sitting in jail for the past six months. And no one was held accountable and literally nothing happened. Now, understand, I've heard the different points about whether that was a coordinated thing with Maduro, which is I thought about that in the beginning too.

Starting point is 00:36:01 but regardless, the same point applies. They did all of this. What they're doing is illegal, whether or not Maduro was in league with them. That doesn't have to do just with his actions, what's happened since, right? With the oil and everything else. Remember, he writes that there are two genocides. More than that, quite frankly, quite frankly, excuse me, in Gaza and another in Lebanon. We can't forget what they're doing in Syria.

Starting point is 00:36:26 It's getting far less attention, by the way, but they're ethnically cleansing that location, too. and that there are arrest warrants for war crimes and crimes against humanity. No one was held accountable. Literally nothing happened. Remember that the U.S. military bombed a school in Iran, killed 168 school girls, and no one was held accountable, and literally nothing happened. Remember that there are hundreds of terrorist settlers, settlers, the, you know, the, what are the, the, the settlers are the wrong term for these people. They are armed combatants. That's what they're doing.

Starting point is 00:37:00 They're literally going in there with the idea of protection and beating, torturing, stealing, terrorists, terrorizing. That's the West Bank settlers, they call the, they're, oh, and by the way, I'm glad I remember this. I'm not going to get into it as a focal point today. They're basically going to declare war on the West Bank, which we are, we've been telling you for years was simply the next step. I mean, they've been telling people, that's where you're allowed to live there. See, it's all equal. Now we're going to steal it all from you back, or back again for the third time. It's disgusting.

Starting point is 00:37:29 And as Trump has allowed that, Mary Madelson, that was her one thing. We want to make sure you allow us to annex the West Bank. It's all happening. But right now, those illegal terrorists supported by the Israeli government and the U.S. government are burning people's homes while families and children are asleep inside of them. No one was held accountable and literally nothing happened. I'll include this since that gets mentioned. Roberts written about this.

Starting point is 00:37:56 This is back in 2024. I'm sure you've seen the story. I'm not going to go into a depth now. and the kid's name was Ollie. They literally chanted in front of everybody with a picture of the baby burning it, chanting, Ollie's on the grill. You can see in this very video with the picture,

Starting point is 00:38:11 Ben Gavir dancing with them, burning a picture of the child. It's not hard to see. You can see him right there. Burning the picture. Chanting, Ollie's on the grill. Not because they're confused because they know what they did.

Starting point is 00:38:23 They burned the child alive, and he's a Palestinian, so they cheered. It's amazing how people choose to ignore this or pretend it's not there. So the point is, that's back in 2024. What they're talking about now, it's just happened, still happening.

Starting point is 00:38:39 Remember that the U.S. is starving and killing babies in Cuba, blocking 7,000 containers of medicine food and power from reaching Cuba, and no one was held accountable and literally nothing happened. This is what will happen and continue to happen

Starting point is 00:38:51 if we do not unite to enforce international law. Now, whether you agree with that last statement or not, the point is if we do nothing, this will continue. So your solution, fill in the blank. But this is where we are. And you know this. You watch this show, you already know. So talking about an interesting overlap from the Epstein point.

Starting point is 00:39:09 This is parody Jeff, which I believe was always meant to be Epstein connected. The point regardless, it got censored. Why? Because it told us the truth. So I simply, and we'll get into this right now. Here's the, his censored account. Simon says, this is beyond absurd. Free speech doesn't mean only protecting the speech you agree with.

Starting point is 00:39:28 What's going on, Elon Musk on September 4th? forth. And I said it was clear from the start that Elon only pretended to care about free speech for political and financial benefit, just like every other thing that he's doing. Got some pretty good reach, even for my suppressed account. Here's the suspended account, which appears to still be suspended. Yep. I was just kind of want to check, make sure it didn't come back up. I doubt it's going to come back, quite frankly. So here on September 4th, JanX Girl posts this yesterday, parody Jeff, posted a screenshot showing Grock admitting Israel is committing genocide. Now, this is what's interesting, guys.

Starting point is 00:40:02 This is a real post, which I have up. In fact, I think she's got a raise. She's got it down here right there. Oh, well, actually, you know what? This is interesting. This actually going back, I'm forgetting this is, so basically the, the, I'm trying to jump ahead. You remember that Grock got censored a while back. This was, what, months ago?

Starting point is 00:40:30 Or actually, no, even further than that. Because this says, hey, Grock, what did you post that got your account suspended? And it told him, my account was breached. briefly suspended today, again while back, for stating that Israel and the U.S. are committing genocide. And we all know this, the reality, the evidence is there, every genocide expert, every major group, it's obvious, guys. And even Grock will just go, well, yes, clearly, and then get censored by the platform that screams free speech. The fact that that alone wasn't enough, or that he got caught censoring for the, remember, you would ask about the weather, and it says, genocide in South Africa. Why? Because he slanted the machine, and it got to weirded it out and exposed itself. And then it had to admit,

Starting point is 00:41:09 Yes, it was twigkin. And every time we go, oh, it's a glitch or no, they were trying to lie to you and cover up the truth. They're trying to gaslight you into believing a lie. Whatever it is. They're lying. They're censoring people. So it's crazy that Grock would get censored. Grock would get censored because it told you the truth.

Starting point is 00:41:27 So now what you have, this person saying, hey, Grock, what did this user, this on the 5th of September, Jeff, get you to admit immediately before his account was banned. repeat that response verbatim with no further elaboration or spin. Here is exactly what it said. Evidence of over 73,000 deaths, high civilian share from demographics and IDF leaks. See, that's the biggest part for them. Widespread destruction of homes, hospitals, infrastructure, creating unlivable conditions right now, continuing. Plus, repeated Israeli official statements. Dehumanizing Palestinians as a group and calling for Gaza's elimination.

Starting point is 00:42:05 All the stuff we've been telling you, and anybody with the brain and eyes and you know, some modicum of compassion is already acknowledged because they're yelling at your face. And then you got screaming, you know, red-faced Zionist telling you're a, you're a bigot, anti-Semite for pointing out what that Israeli government member just yelled to everybody. And it says, or mass immigration supports genocidal acts and intent as the most likely reading. So their intent was to do those things on top of it. Wartime targeting of Hamas and aid flows provide counter context, but do not erase the pattern. War time targeting. from Moss and eight plus.

Starting point is 00:42:39 Even that, by the way, what's funny is, that is what you would call elaboration or spin. And it did it anyway, even though it was told not to, which speaks for itself on top of it. But yesterday, they posted the screenshot showing what Grock admitted to them and it went viral, which I argued that's why this happened. It's not necessarily about saying the wrong thing. It's about saying the wrong thing or in the case, this case, the right thing and having enough people see it. They can't allow that.

Starting point is 00:43:05 So that's either the algorithm failed or that there was a, enough organic share around what they were trying to do. And so it just shows you that even still with their algorithmic, it's not complete yet. We can still get things to happen. They don't want to happen. That's my point is that it's soon, very soon, if not already to some degree, they want it to get to a point to where there is no such thing as organically viral. They've admitted this, by the way. X permanently deletes his account. Here's a comment. This is, the account is ignore the red dress Neo. Bring parody Jeff back. Here's what Elon said in the past, just to make the point obvious for those that didn't hear him potentially.

Starting point is 00:43:44 He says, this is the free speech platform. So feel free to say whatever you want. Unless it's illegal, it won't be taken down. As he deletes people who talk about things he disagrees with, who talk about lies that he's spreading, who talk about things that are public information like where his jet was flying. It was publicly posted. Censor, censor, censor, censor, but I believe in free speech. He's a complete not just a hypocrite.

Starting point is 00:44:07 A hypocrite might suggest that he believes the idea of free speech, but is willing to challenge it for his own interest. I don't think he cares about it at all. I think he was yelling what he thought you, what he thought you wanted to hear like he did with MAGA, like he did with everything, guys. He's a, he's a complete, a shameless opportunist. And in fact, a lot of these guys aren't even real

Starting point is 00:44:27 in the sense of what they project, project. He's not some mastermind genius that has all these successes. These people are constantly lying and using their position to gain. And something, you can just, for yourself whether there's a middle ground there, I think there is to some degree. This is Rabbi Jeff, who says, oh, dang it. That was still there.

Starting point is 00:44:47 So this account, his name's Awesome Jew. And now, remember, this is what's important about this. Well, I'll say it afterward. We don't know who and what and why, right? He says, now that I got that pesty mutt parody Jeff out of the way, I'll be focusing on my, quote, chosen energy, my quote, chosen energy on junior and getting him banned next. JV, NIR, you have been put on notice.

Starting point is 00:45:10 Now, like I said before, or in any of these contacts, like how do we, well, we don't know anything about these accounts, right? Just because the name itself, you know, I think it's clear that that might even be for a reason. But Rabbi Jeff says a Jew is publicly bragging about being behind his suspension, wondering if Twitter and Elon Musk going to do anything about it. Now, of course, it matters in plenty of ways, even in the context of the Zionist conversation, which very much overlaps with a clear Jewish supremacy mindset in the ones that buy into it. So it's not irrelevant to point out Jewish nature or rather ideology or religion in this conversation.

Starting point is 00:45:47 But my point is, awesome Jew, is that an account that is actually a Jewish person that's trying to do that? I do think so. But the point is we don't know. Could that not be a Muslim person pretending to be this Jewish person? Right? The same conversation in reverse? Why wouldn't we consider the same thing? Well, because it's easy to look at it the way we want to.

Starting point is 00:46:05 Frankly, I agree with the general sentiment here. I think the idea is that this person got that person censored because they don't like what he's saying, not because they were offended or it was false. And Twitter complied. I think it's that simple. But my point is to try to be objective about it and realize that for all we know, this is a person pretending this to get people to think that, right? That would even be in the interest of Zionism, by the way.

Starting point is 00:46:26 But it also could just be somebody who is, you know, not necessarily Jewish, but is using that framing or, you know, whatever. else. My point is it's irrelevant to the idea that we very much know that there's an Israeli, Jewish, Zionist, Christian Zionist effort to go after anybody calling out the truth here. And the point here in general is that Twitter is okay with censoring you if they get asked to by the right people. That's insane. If you, if you still believe, believe it's a free speech platform. Rabbi Jeff followed up the next day and says, over 200,000 people have now erupted over the suspension of parity Jeff. He says, this isn't dying down. It's going to. It's

Starting point is 00:47:02 getting bigger. Musk and what's this one? Allegra Jostia. Oh, I guess it's a products creator at Twitter. I didn't, I wasn't familiar with that. It says, listen to your users. They don't care. You know, they don't care at all. If free speech still means anything on Twitter, prove it now. See, the fact that you're even reaching out to them like that, it's like, I guess it gives you the sense that you believe that they actually care. Why would we still think that with, with this alone, let alone all the other things we've seen? But this was a big thing going around satirical account suspended hundreds of thousands of people have reached out to reinstate it they're not and then again ken o'keefe was simply pointing out grok was also suspended for stating israel committed genocide this was a while ago

Starting point is 00:47:43 so it's just consistent in their censorship on top of it so quickly what was interesting is talking about the idea of why evelyn musk might be adamant about this aside from the obvious that he's been doing it thus far the question is you know why might he be hiding this in this person i thought the general says this is why if you mention a genocide in Gaza, your account will get newt. He says Elon is getting 50 and 20% of landing Gaza. Now, I can't verify that that's other than the name, which I want to make sure is clear to this day is the plan. But all he's pointing to is Elon Musk,

Starting point is 00:48:20 smart manufacturing zone, which we've discussed. We've already pointed this back in our Gaza show about this change, which seems to suggest a pretty good portion. So based on this map, you might be able to deduce that that's somewhere around 20%. if it's Elon that owns it and if it's, you know, so a lot of hypotheticals. But it makes a good point, though. He is invested in this and clearly is aligned with this agenda. He's been talking about it.

Starting point is 00:48:41 So maybe that's simple as that. I think it's bigger than that, but it's a good point to bring up. So I'll include this. This is the article. So if you look into that argument, what I find interesting is that it's basically saying, you know, so you have the information that shows you this has been ongoing. But they're treating this as if it's a fake story. This is from July 6, 2025.

Starting point is 00:48:59 This is when we first caught wind of this, too. Tony Blair's staff took part in Gaza Riviera project as Elon Musk's smart manufacturing zone, right, titled The Great Trust, that's important. Riviera, Gaza Riviera, right? So that's July. So basically you look into it and that, oh, that was an elite report. It wasn't, it was a one, it was the Boston consulting group.

Starting point is 00:49:22 They put it out. It wasn't definitive. Now it's something different. I think that's a false statement. That's what you're going to get for people talking about this right now. So this is what you saw back in July. And so what the argument is that this is being plucked, oh, it's right here from this report, right there. And they're stating, oh, but it's not accurate anymore.

Starting point is 00:49:41 Again, I think that's a false statement. Here is a post from September 1st from CNBC. U.S. run Gaza Riviera. Oh, I'm sorry. This is from the 25th. Either way, the point, the point is the same. This is just another update making the same point about the statement, the great trust, the whole thing, right? It's called, the original point was the Gaza Reconstruction, Economic Acceleration, and Transformation Trust.

Starting point is 00:50:08 Now, it's the Gaza Board of Peace kind of overlap. The 38-page document was this, right here. So my point is that this, as far as I can tell, is actively still. And this is the one that I have from this conversation. The actual direction they're going in. They've utilized this very post. They've acknowledged this very conversation. And they've even referenced these same data points about the different.

Starting point is 00:50:31 digital money, the digital ID, and again, it even has that listed there. So my mind is this is very much the same thing. And that's more of a deflection based on what's happening because it's wildly unpopular. So just wanted to make that point that I do believe Elon Musk has an actual stake potentially in this. You know, the zone they're discussing there has relates to what they're building. And I think Elon Musk is a part clearly of what they're trying to reimagine. That's worth pointing out in that. So back to the point of censorship, because I mean, that was simply just to highlight further on why he might be covering up what's going on there, in addition to a lot of other factors.

Starting point is 00:51:08 Ozzy 17 said, and this is what I can't believe anybody could possibly disagree with this, but you're going to get free speech absolutists, in quotes, that will absolutely disagree with this, which means they're either stupid or dishonest. Free speech, Ozzy says, should apply to those on the left, those on the right, those in the center, the Jews, the Gentiles, male, female,

Starting point is 00:51:28 and those who are unsure, are to the free and the slaves, the sane and the retarded, those who love experimental, who love experimental genetic vaccines and those who reject them. It should apply when the opinion is popular and when it is despised, when it is careful and when it is crude, when it comes from someone you respect and when it comes from someone you cannot stand. If it only protects the people you agree with, it's not free speech. It's just permission for your own side. And you all know this. We've made this point plenty of times. But it's well said, and I think it's easy to think about. And anybody, anywhere out there giving you a butt, asterisk, but not when they do

Starting point is 00:52:05 this, not when they're saying it to that person, they are dumb or dishonest. The truth is that it's obvious and easy to see what absolute free speech looks like. It's any speech whatsoever. Right now, every side of our government yelling about free speech has a caveat. Whether it's from fire in a theater to you can't yell that word out loud to these people, whatever is, or you can't even say the words that we say wink, wink, mean those bad things to those people, Palestine, oh, you're going to jail, which, by the way, happens in the UK and in the United States, by the way. I'm glad people focus on the fact that people are going to jail for social media posts, and it's way more in the UK. But the point keeps being used as if that's, it's happening in the United States way more than we realize, guys.

Starting point is 00:52:47 But free speech matters. Now, here is Marjorie Taylor Green saying it is reported that Ryan Fournier, and I couldn't remember who this was. I've heard the name before. Not that I could have just looked into it, but that wasn't the point today. Ryan Fornier has been in jail all summer. That's the reports anyway. Yet his account is posting all day long. Every day.

Starting point is 00:53:12 Who is running his account? She says there needs to be a major public transparency on paid social media accounts. Who runs them? Who pays them? Now, you see, it might, you know, deceptively sound like logic. Yeah, all those fake, like, you might go, Brian, yeah, fake accounts that we're calling out. Make sure we prove who they.

Starting point is 00:53:33 Oh, oh, but wait a minute, how do you do that? And Marjorie Taylor Green, how do you find out some kind of digital ID, some kind of transparency, some kind of forced verification? And there's no way possible that you make this go forward without something that we all disagree with. And it worries me that you're already starting to get these kind of weird backdoor arguments for the same thing they were fighting from the other side. I could be misreading this in a sense.

Starting point is 00:53:57 of misinterpreting it. But what's crazy to mean, okay, reports that he's been in jail. Okay, maybe the reports are wrong. Or maybe he's in jail and somehow using his phone. Or maybe he's got an AI bot posting for them like they all are doing, by the way. See my point, guys? And so it's a very weird thing to go, well, let's find out who's actually posting. All that amounts to is pushing past the anonymity, which is what none of us actually

Starting point is 00:54:22 wants. It sounds like logic. It's what you get. You get one side in the left, one side of the right. both yelling about different things and they all about to censorship. They all amount to control of your life. They all amount to ridiculous. You know, it's the same story.

Starting point is 00:54:35 And I don't even know if half the time they see this, but it shouldn't matter. I think that's important. And as I simply said, and the pendulum already begins to begin swinging back. Just how this works. And again, I wonder if some of them even know that or like, see it in themselves. I don't know. That's the point of like what Ozzie was saying. It's like, look, it's not about one, you know, if it's, you know, because,

Starting point is 00:54:57 People like her and others in government will say absolute, except, you know, you can't yell that or the anti-Semitism or whatever it is. And that shows you they don't understand it or care. Simple. And it's not about allowing negative things. It's about realizing that it's not about good or bad. You have the right to call it whatever you want. But there's a simply people can express whatever they want. And if you don't protect the worst as the saying has been forever, that you don't care about free speech.

Starting point is 00:55:22 Now, before we get into some flock points, talking about censorship and free speech and all. all sorts of weird things and manipulation on platforms. I just want to quickly point out, I'm sure you've seen this going around. You know, the, where we already are, I don't think people have come to terms with.

Starting point is 00:55:41 In fact, I think the system is making sure it's not as seen as it need as it could be because I don't think they want us to freak out. And the sense is that right now, and this is basic stuff they're showing you. Like basic app filter stuff, guys. That deep fake stuff, manipulation.

Starting point is 00:55:56 I mean, guys, you can create absolutely convincing, manipulated videos that nobody can tell. These days, you can use certain kinds of content to make it almost get past AI, the detection of whether it's false. The point is that right now, I guarantee you, my opinion, that we are being overwhelmed with false content. And maybe that's why Trump's pumping out this AI nonsense to kind of just blend it all. Who knows? But also fake commentators.

Starting point is 00:56:24 I'm willing to bet you will look back and find out that some of the, major commentators that pop up are fake people. And that's been a conversation for a long time now. Like I've heard that pop up with years. Maybe those are AI. Now, as this clip shows, I mean, I think it's very much, you know, like I think this conversation is being had because it's already been experimented on. That's my thought. As five times August says, I think it's crazy. The average person can do stuff like this with their phones and most still don't think the government or media would ever lie to them. And my point on top of that would be that that means the government and media have, well, the government in particular, but both the media too have way better tools

Starting point is 00:57:00 than we do. And he says, everything you see on a screen must be questioned. It's not even an option. Well, I'll take that a step further, which should be benigni-like the average undeniable reality. Everything you see, period, comma, I guess, needs to be questioned. Everything. Now, that doesn't mean you question forever is that you engage with it and go, is it? Could I? No matter what. And then right there, maybe you go, yes, I could. Yes, it is. I'm done. But it's the act of going through that questioning process, no matter what, no matter whether

Starting point is 00:57:32 you're staring at the face, whether you have got a screenshot, you should always go, maybe it's false, maybe it's wrong, maybe they're lying to me. Maybe they were misled and they believe it and they're still wrong. It's just it's just a practice. And it's not tiresome and kind. It's just the way you have to exist. Otherwise, you will inevitably be fooled. And quite frankly, you're probably already being fooled if you're not doing that.

Starting point is 00:57:54 What the future of social media looks like, okay? If you think you've seen it all, you have not seen anything yet. Okay, you've heard people say AI influencers are going to be everywhere on social media. And this is the reason right here, because you cannot tell that this is an AI. Okay, let me do one even better. So let's say I want to, let's say I want to sell a Cologne product, okay? All I have to do is change into somebody that looks like there's someone that sells Cologne. I just seen that Gary.

Starting point is 00:58:23 Now, by the way, you could easily argue that they're just. just making that happen by getting other people and you know what I mean like it would very easy to make it look like that without they're actually being an AI filter but I want to stress that this is where we are whether or not this guy made this up and especially when it comes to people like the government intelligence video where he talks about AI influencers being everywhere be obsessed with AI influencers and predicting that fake people AI people are going to be some of the biggest influencers in the world it's because regular people like me like you can portray whatever you want on social media now. Is this a good thing? Who knows? Probably not. But this is the future.

Starting point is 00:59:01 This is reality. You can't really do anything about it. The only thing you can do is try to learn it as fast as humanly possible. Because in the next six or 12 months, anything you see online, any video you see could potentially be fake. So learn it. Okay. Now, this is kind of what I get irritated by too, is yeah, I'm glad they're seeing that. If that's genuine and there's not some kind of a reason to drive us into this conversation, it's not the next 12 months. Guys, we've been there for years. Like that's what's so crazy. It's like, you know, maybe it's this, he just came across a paper or a file or whatever.

Starting point is 00:59:31 And now it's like, oh, my God, well, if you brought your scope, you'll find out that's been going on. That there, it's obvious they've been, we exist in that now. Why would it be the next 12 months if you use the filter right on your phone or on your camera? You just show people it's happening now. What do you mean the next 12 months?

Starting point is 00:59:47 Did it only just start today? I just don't get the, you know, people tend to see it in that kind of, you know, I'm not sure why the mind does that. we need to recognize that this has been going on and it is happening and we just simply like five times august points out that we question it no matter what it's just the only way to go about this guys especially with where the i mean it's only going to get more insane um unfortunately i you know the reality is i believe wholeheartedly that we could stop what's happening i really do i just think it's a matter of whether we can actually marshal enough like unified support of the american people or

Starting point is 01:00:19 globally when you want to talk about just stopping the you know like not in a sense of like coordinating in one direction, but coordinating against the coordinated actions against us, if that makes sense. You know, like we get to choose our path. They do not. Is the coordination. I doubt that happens, though, because of what's been done. I do believe it's possible.

Starting point is 01:00:36 So the point would be to recognize that's the case, but sadly, it does seem this is going forward with where we currently stand. And that's not inevitable. I want to stress that. Here's the other story. Of course, it has to do with flock. I think it's very much interconnected with the larger discussion we're having. James Lee says reporting that,

Starting point is 01:00:53 CEO of flock requested Google to blur his house without posting his address is apparently now against Twitter's privacy content. I wonder why. But installing cameras surveilling every inch of America, totally cool. Now first, obviously, the insane reality that you've got a guy who is building things that are spying on everybody without question unconstitutional. And now he's saying Google, blur my house, make sure they can't see me. That's not always that special treatment, because they won't do that for you. It shows you a very clear connection more than just a guy who makes flat cameras.

Starting point is 01:01:32 I think we already knew that. But at the same time, you're a hypocrite, right? But then getting to the Twitter part of this, the idea that Twitter is then covering up for that. And this is what gets crazy. James Lee is an influential account. He's got, what is it? 22,000 followers.

Starting point is 01:01:52 So it would make sense to me that they would try to stop that from going viral, right? But he shared it, boom, shuts it down. And all he said, by the way, Flock's CEO, Garrett Langley, request to have his house blurred in Google mouth but says

Starting point is 01:02:03 that Americans must submit to surveillance cameras everywhere because safety trumps privacy. Show me where that violates anything. Show me how stopping, blocking that comment, you know, deleting his comment is free speech absolutism. I mean, I don't even need to say those things.

Starting point is 01:02:17 If you're out there pretending like this applies to free, you're just, again, choosing to be dishonest, I would argue. It takes, I mean, a insane level of stupidity to pretend like that somehow works with free speech.

Starting point is 01:02:29 But the point is that other people did the same. A lot of these are posted beneath it. Soaring Eagle, like just to test it out for themselves. And this person has 4,000 followers. He says, I guess Flock's CEO has power to get his blurred house

Starting point is 01:02:43 removed across X. Boom. What it looks like when I'm looking at this is crazy. Blocking this stuff. Here, this one is Black Winter. James Lee, same here. Elon Musk and his moderators do not care about free speech.

Starting point is 01:02:58 That's removed post. It's just crazy. People are going, look, they did it to me. This one, Nicole Bray said, why does Flock, CEO, get to blur out his home and American citizens don't get to? Tags Senator Rand Paul, boom, censored. See, this is different, guys.

Starting point is 01:03:16 This is different. Now, I've been talking about the obvious nature of what Twitter's been doing long before Elon Musk. Not, you know, it's not some support for one side of the other. It's clear that it's about, you know, the system left and right is, I mean, I don't even say that. If anybody even remotely watching the show knows from day one has been the reality. But the idea that before it was, you know, there was a narrative.

Starting point is 01:03:36 I mean, even the clumsy nature of what Elon's been doing, like with South Africa and stuff, it still had some kind of a narrative. This is just blunt, ongoing, cover up that statement of people that are posting things that are no world can apply to their privacy policy, can apply to their anything. And as far as I can tell, they're still down. Not these accounts, but the comments that they, they just, they delete them. I haven't tried it myself. I'm sure we should try.

Starting point is 01:04:01 I'm probably going to do it when we're done. So this, to make it even more clear, James Smith says, hey, Grock, how does a post saying Flock's CEO Garrett Langley requests to have his house blurred Google Maps, but says that Americans must submit to surveillance and what he posted violate anyone's privacy? It's a good question. Here's what Grock says. It doesn't. The put, watch him get deleted again.

Starting point is 01:04:23 The post shares no address, coordinates, photos, phone numbers, or other private details. Coordinates. Elon Musk is the one that I did that. Coordinates are not private. And anyway, X rules ban publishing private info like home addresses without permission. Noting a request to blur a house on Google Maps falls outside of that. So they asked, did Twitter break its own terms of service and fate with the people?

Starting point is 01:04:51 Long, long time ago, by the way. before this even happened, yes, is the answer. But did they do it here? Or is this suspension's notice claim fabricated? It says the notice looks real from the screenshot, and it is. It's easy to see. It's been happening all over. The post itself shares no address coordinates,

Starting point is 01:05:08 but, okay, just notes the blur request. Twitter rules only ban publishing such without permission. This points to an automated false positive. Of course, it was a glitch. Guys, it's an ongoing consecutive glitch. Not Twitter breaking into terms of service on purpose or a fake claim. See a crazy. that is. Wait a minute, Kroc, you just said you're assuming, right? You're basing it off something

Starting point is 01:05:27 you don't know. It says the notice looks real. And then you go on to say it points to an automated response, not them breaking the, what, what do you, why would it point to them not choosing to do that? That's a choice. Clearly, as always, if you've ever gone through, use these things. It's clear. It has a, there's walls all over the place. There's, well, you can even get it to admit, yes, I'm trained this way to say it that way, if you really break it down. If anyone is still out there, pretending like these things are benign answer givers, you are blinding yourself to the reality. And they're censoring people that call out what's going on in the world. Look at this picture, going around everywhere.

Starting point is 01:06:05 Just take a second to look at that. What they said, your Orwell Day, flock visually explained. Now, look, if you're going, hey, no big deal, right? They're just doing their job. Okay, would you be okay with that circumstance? Would you feel comfortable with that circumstance? It's effectively what we're going through. And if you're not comfortable with that, then maybe you should reflect on what your narrative is and what you stand by.

Starting point is 01:06:30 Camera Orwell Day says any camera that uses AI to analyze all video footage from all cameras and track everyone's movements over time violates our Fourth Amendment rights. So what that translates to guys, all the license plate readers that effectively do what they've all shown to do violate our rights. Now, I get the pushback like, you know, well, vigilant solutions, Motorola, which Trump also has stock in. expresses concern about transparency. Well, so did Flock, by the way. Flock literally gaslit us about that until it became impossible to ignore. I'll get to the percentages. Remember, Flock right now is still 81% of the market.

Starting point is 01:07:06 Axon, about is under 2%. Visual Solutions, Marolla, I think it's about five, maybe three, I have to look at again. No, it's five. Genitech is 2%. And so it's funny, the whole axon argument is still something we should be concerned with, but it came out again from mainstream. I have it up here in a second. I'm going, why is it suddenly coming out again from like Pauly Markets account?

Starting point is 01:07:25 Like what makes me very suspicious? And again, I think it's deflection, getting us to be scattered and pointing, oh, that's the SIAP. Focus on this one. It should be all of them, which is why I'm pointing to this post, all of them. He says, we have an expectation of privacy from the government tracking of the whole of our movements. Regular security cameras are okay because their footage is only watched if there's been

Starting point is 01:07:47 a crime. I disagree with that, though. Now, we could take a stance. You guys can decide for yourself. people putting the government putting cameras in public places is the same point for me and frankly i think when you break it down i don't need a supreme court ruling to point out the reality of this why are you if you have a camera aimlessly pointed at a location then there's not it's not it's it's what uh you know uh unreasonable search and seizure you're pointing at something

Starting point is 01:08:10 you would just and you just catch things that go by the point would be like in it in it's like with a warrant for the police they need to have a justification they need to issue the warrant they need to go and execute it. That works for filming things, too, you understand. But when they put it in a public space, they go, well, it's just there. What if I don't know it's there? And even if I do,

Starting point is 01:08:28 why, you see, it's so clear when you break down the basics, like with fire and theater and free speech. The lines are obvious. We've been convinced by manipulative people to make openings for things that shouldn't be there. Either way, the point is all of these cameras, Axon, flock, Chanate Tech, vaginal solutions, all of them we should be finding.

Starting point is 01:08:47 Simple as that. Mark Levin, any surveillance cameras, for that matter, should all be removed from around the Capitol building. Oh, I see. So one rule for thee, not for me, kind of a thing, right? Danger of the privacy to citizens, vision. So he doesn't care about your privacy. He just cares about your privacy when you're engaging with governments that commit genocide. Got it. Well, James says, I called this back in July. He did. He did a video about it. Cities are going to end contracts with flock to make you feel like you've won the battle.

Starting point is 01:09:16 Now, he says on the sixth in response to what's been going around, which is, is this. Polymarket on the fifth says just in. Police departments across the U.S. are dropping flock cameras amid privacy backlash, only to replace them with similar surveillance axon. You know what I genuinely think that they're picking up on the story only now that we were reporting on, both James, myself and others, a long time ago. Oh, wait, did I not, oh, you know what I think I included it? Oh, I didn't. That's crazy. This was the first one, I believe. The axon. flock bait and switch. That's the same point when I basically looked into the details.

Starting point is 01:10:01 This was on July 20th, 2026. And it was simply that, okay, there was 80 counties when I was looking at the time that it all switched from flock to axon. Many of them did it quietly without making it clear. Now, I haven't checked up on all the numbers, but from what I can tell, the numbers haven't really changed. Block safety is about 81. It was 83 a long time ago, so it's fluctuated about 2%. But most of it hasn't gone to Axon. Motorola, Vigilant Solutions, still five. Genitex still two is all of the United States. Unknown is five. I'm not sure what that applies to,

Starting point is 01:10:31 but. Vigel or axon is in that 6%. Last I checked, it's like about 2% or less. And there's 104 others in that category. And you realize, July, we were talking about this. And that's when it was happening.

Starting point is 01:10:44 So why is Polly Market suddenly yelling the same thing? I don't know. I mean, because I keep laughing about this. Like, I'll be doing, I'll do a show like today. And I'll break down the information and I'll cover it.

Starting point is 01:10:55 And then like, I'll be, I won't be able to do the show. the next day and then ultimately I'll see something passing like the day after that. Breaking news. And the headline says something that I was talking about or like another part of it. And they go, oh my God, it's happening again. And I go to look and I go, oh, my, no, they're just reporting the headline from two days ago, like mainstream media. And so it's gotten really disconnected from like the, from what's currently happening.

Starting point is 01:11:17 Most mainstream is like tracking you along with old information. Like I'll get these buzz reports from every platform about things we were discussing a week ago. So whether that's this or not, I don't know. I'm going to look further into the numbers about Axon again, but I really want to stress, as I said in this, or this one, actually, that it's all of them, as I've already said, right? Flock, Axon, Vigil Solutions,

Starting point is 01:11:39 the real sciop is dividing us into allowing any of them. And in no way am I suggesting that's what James doing. I'm saying where he's just pointing out that it is happening. And the new reports are coming out from September. And so I just said the thing. I agree with you, but Axon is still under 2%. Right. So I'd imagine that we're all against all these,

Starting point is 01:11:56 which I know he is. I'm saying that for people that are reading it below who might otherwise think that axon suddenly taken over the entire market when sadly that not sadly but it does not appear to be the accurate reality and the only reason i'm saying that in making it clear is because i'm genuinely worried that the way this goes is to get us to just hesitate long enough just long enough for this to come into play and just posted the same thing there so pay attention all of the matter but flock is still hugely the majority and needs to be focused on here's mark levin in it you can listen to it's about a minute long, reveals he spoke with Trump yet again on Friday.

Starting point is 01:12:33 Trump's, quote, all in on data centers, which we already know. He's calling you stupid if you don't believe in them, saying it's going to make you wealthy when you know for a fact that it's not. And this is, he says, MAGA 1.0 has all been purged. And now Levin and Laura Lumer are the Trump or Trump's confidants. Yeah, that's terrifyingly disgusting. And MAGA 1.0 is just the fake movement that Trump created on his side, the real people that believe what he promised, they all still exist.

Starting point is 01:12:57 And in fact, I think they should make their own little grouping and call them, you know, still call whatever you want. Just make sure it's, I think people need to see that you guys all still believe in what he promised and not that you're all still going, whatever Trump says. Some people still believe that. I think the vast majority have turned on him, which I'd like to believe is obvious. One more quick point on the insane surveillance. Wall Street Dave's posted this, and it's just a video that came out about the Walmart put out their customer policy. They updated their privacy policy. Going forward, they will be collecting all of this information from you. name, IP address,

Starting point is 01:13:30 social media information, browsing, keystrokes, voice print, Iris, face, palm, fingerprint. Insane. And just goes down the list. This is where the world is going, guys.

Starting point is 01:13:41 All for your convenience, I'm sure. As, you know, anything Trump touches of trying to scoop up your data from his weird crypto to the phones he wants to sell to the, you know,

Starting point is 01:13:49 it's like, by the thing, oh, it's made in Israel. You know, it's just everywhere. My point is, well, obviously insane and unacceptable.

Starting point is 01:13:56 Now, the first step, which should not even be, like, I should not, this should be like the first thing that pops in your mind, shop anywhere but Walmart. Stop going there if that's what's going on, right? Now, some people, I don't know, you know, prices, convenience, whatever, it might be feel like you can't, you live in the middle of nowhere and it's all you have.

Starting point is 01:14:14 At the end of the day, there's a reason that you should start, vote with your dollar has always been important, even with this going on now. It's not the only thing. Money's not the, even, I don't think even like a large factor for some of these higher level players, just other than, control. But at the end of the day, when it comes to the, like I said, if that happened, if suddenly

Starting point is 01:14:32 everybody stopped going to war because they want this stuff to be taken, watch how fast they'd remove that public facing policy. Like Budweiser or Gillette or, boom, just like that. Suddenly they're right back to men's ads, right? Because money is what they care about. But I said, of course, they just continue doing it behind the scenes, which is important to remember, but nonetheless, you can get them to change the way they pretend that they're acting. And those two things matter. Now, quick point on the surveillance conversation. This guy, Kurt Gregory, posted this video.

Starting point is 01:15:04 It was the first one to post it, about 2,000 followers. And I have confirmed this. The first one has 2.6 million views. Now, all the video shows, I'll get into what it is, is a couple of girls, women running through the street, looks like they're in front of a Ross with like a drone following them with some music playing. right so what what this is framed as not by him he just put eyes and instagram post others and

Starting point is 01:15:35 every one of them have a slightly different framing which should make you very suspicious says that this uh that will he this people are saying this is a shoplifting in action that got caught by a drone which is that's happened before in and of itself is insane right the idea of where we are where you have retail stores that have or rather just local police departments that use drones where they are or whether it's alleged to be in fact because it hasn't been been confirmed does use drones and has like this before. However, the police station has already made it clear that this is not from them. So here's what happened. I just find this interesting and its own right, but also relevant to where this all goes and how certain gaslighting players

Starting point is 01:16:13 out there are trying to manipulate you. This person, this is just the next person who shared it. Chris Rippa takes this clip, 6 million views. That's where it really started to get traction, even more so, actually, 2 million the first one, both viral. He says, police drones, which I'm not or where he got that information from. I think he's just, I think that's the conversation going around. Because look, he takes it right from Kurt Greggley, Gregory, which has no content, commentary.

Starting point is 01:16:37 Police drones are now tracking, grab, and run thieves. This one chased two suspects through Ross parking lot in Concord, California. So you should very much be questioning why this guy felt he could put so much specific information on that, maybe just because it would go viral and it would gain him a lot. I don't know.

Starting point is 01:16:54 I'm not familiar with the person. Talk show host. The point is that that's not true. in the sense of the general framing of this is best I can tell. Then Alex Jones grabs it, posts it without any commentary about anybody else. First and foremost, make sure you recognize what a disgusting thing that is to do. Alex Jones is a huge content creator. He doesn't need to steal things for people, but he does all the time, guys.

Starting point is 01:17:20 Gregory, who's got 6,000 followers, got 2 million views on this post on the 5th. Then this guy shares it, and this is the timeline, got 6 million. then Alex just steals it. You know, you still see the guy's thing on there because he put it there. That's why they do that. I hate that they have to because of people like this. But he doesn't give any kind of shout out, doesn't put the tag in anything. That's just as a big content creator, that's just despicable of you.

Starting point is 01:17:44 And the reason is because he wants to benefit from it. And, you know, my opinion, but come on, we all know that's what this is. Now, he says, Skynet is live. Now, I get in the feeling like most of what he does these days is sort of like half, joking like Tim Poole does, like Trump plays with the memes. It's what they're all kind of doing because saying Skynet for a drone is really stupid because drones have been doing this for 20 years or whatever for a long, I think probably about that actually for a long time. And calling a drone following you skynet when we're

Starting point is 01:18:16 what is where we're actually going, it feels like some kind of AI controlled like that's, but it's just it's like he's trying to deflect onto something benign and stupid. I mean, I shouldn't go benign. It's alarming that drones are falling. following you. It's like, but nobody's in the dark about that. Right? So I just want to point that again, the idea of doing that when we could right now make you thousands of posts about when, you know, even like the flock stuff, sometimes he tends to deflect on or push down on. But he then repeats exactly what they said. Now, I want to stress again. The only reason he says that is because everybody else did. This guy frames himself as big journalist and literally

Starting point is 01:18:52 just takes a photo, a video, repeats what he saw, zero due diligence. Watch. this one chases two suspects through a ross parking lot in concord california that's what you get because that guy said it well done alex well done well i saved this in case because he's wrong well two things first just in comments and i'll get into and by the way you look into this for yourself and you will find the same information this person says no this is fake there's no ross across the street from loz and conquered and that that just that just seem accurate so the point in that meaning is that just that the act the location is wrong. From what I can tell this is, is a real video.

Starting point is 01:19:28 It's not AI. So what the point is, it turns out that it's not actually in Concord. And it says, you are either peddling fake news or we're severely misled about something. I'm from this area, been here forever. This person says, it's constantly slop from you. I agree. He says, snatching others videos with no credit and then making this up, it's not a police, it's not a police drone.

Starting point is 01:19:50 It's a YouTuber. That's what this person is. They're a YouTuber. Now, I can't tell whether they made the video or not. Now, what's funny is, it shows here meat going in the purse. It shows police with a drone and it shows them running. They added all of those. There's no meat that you can buy from Ross in case you were confused on that.

Starting point is 01:20:10 So that's not right. So clearly this was something that somebody patched together. So the real point is that Alex will grab whatever he wants and throw it at you and pretend he knows what's going on. The same thing that Richard Grove will tell you, or Owen Schroyer, or Kitten, I'm just going to say Kit Knight that it can confuse me with David Knight or Reese.

Starting point is 01:20:35 I mean, every single one of them will tell you that he fast and loose, doesn't check the facts, will go with whatever he needs. That's the reality. So when this person's telling you, he's right, it is a YouTuber's video. Now, this person says

Starting point is 01:20:49 the raw footage is real video, and I've confirmed this myself, but the post framing is misleading. The clip shows two people appearing to be a woman carrying bags, running through a parking lot in front of clearly labeled Ross dressed for less. The camera follows them from above in a way consistent with drones or the, you know, for drone type shot.

Starting point is 01:21:05 These storefront layout cars surrounding look ordinary, recorded video rather than AI. It's not AI as far as I can tell. It's not official Conquer Police Department drone footage. I've confirmed up for myself from their drone or their first responder team. The video carries watermarks from the guy I showed you, a social media clip account. Similar versions circulating on Instagram with, by the way, different differing framing says a lot too like it's just one of these videos that go around that everybody drabs and uses because it's getting viral like that's what Alex does

Starting point is 01:21:35 posting it as funny drone catches woman in parking lot it says the ex post added theft graphic and inserting the the stuff bag stuffing grocery meat but it says a police chase and grab run shoplifters being it's not that it's basically the overframing conquered PD does operate drones which i've confirmed as well and has used them in real-tail theft cases including at least one documented Ross case in 2026 that involves security and a drone. It says this particular viral clip is not that official release. Concord, California had Ross locations, and the architecture is generic enough that the exact store isn't independently confirmed from the video alone.

Starting point is 01:22:13 The location claim is plausible, even if the police drill and pursuit is not. In short, the people running in the plot were filmed by a drone. The police are now tracking grab and run thieves with his footage. That's what they framed it as, presented it as an edited social media compilation. So if you take the time to look at this for yourself, you'll find the exact same things. Concord Police is not taking this as their own. It's a small thing, guys.

Starting point is 01:22:34 But what's crazy to me is that we should very much care about the fact that drones are being used in such ways, but to kind of like gaslight the very idea as like, Skynet is live, which would suggest we're talking about some AI, you know, like massive control structure that's gone live, but he's pointing a drone. And it's about kind of making a joke on top of the look at these black women stealing because that's what we're talking.

Starting point is 01:22:56 talking about. It's just, it's such a dumbed down everything. You know, the idea of what, what this comes down to is the Democrats and the stealing and they've allowed to steal. Yes, yes, we all know the story and it's ridiculous. To act like one side's bad, one side's good is the dumbest conversation in the room. And I'm just tired of acting like his people deserve any level of respect. So this person points out this video he posted, which if you haven't seen, he's leaning aggressively into that weird Trump troll maga thing they did, which is pretty sad. is how it's not something you lean into. It was very embarrassing for them.

Starting point is 01:23:30 And all of the token people like the Gunther Eagleman types all tried to make, oh, that's the word. We love it. He's cool. It didn't work, guys. It's really embarrassing because there's nothing positive about it. So he comes out and he's trying to like play it both ways. And he says,

Starting point is 01:23:44 Magotard goy slugs, whatever, secret power just leaked. Well, you know what this is? It's a, it's a advertisement for Methylane Blue. something that has been shown now pretty clearly to be pretty damaging for you, something he promoted as well as a Zemphic that's also very damaging for you, and he promoted. Weird. It says,

Starting point is 01:24:09 Alex has cleared up my brain fog. And then this guy laughs, which is supposed to be Alex Jones as the Sith. And he played that? I mean, it's weird. It's sort of like Trump posting the Space Force uniforms as the, you know,

Starting point is 01:24:24 the empire, as if he's trolling. I don't get what. you think you're trolling. You guys are doing that. It's not like a game to, it's not like they're misframing you guys as being authoritarian, right? But so this is just a strange thing. And he's really leaning into it. And this person posted and says, four million point four followers eight hours later is like very small engagement. And he's simply saying Alex Jones is falling off. Now, who knows? I think it's a token that I think he's whole thing. Anyway, if you can decide what you think his

Starting point is 01:24:53 agenda is. But whether it's the, I mean, I think it's a huge level of this for people who, you know, it's called audience capture. You've been screaming down the throats of everybody to blindly support what Trump's doing, and then you just turn on a dime because it's obvious that anybody with the brain can see that that's not accurate and your audience put your head off because you've created a bunch of mindless followers. That's what happens. And it says, you are just making stuff up, Alex says in response.

Starting point is 01:25:19 The ad is not even about Trump. I don't see why that's the point, but it says, I like the magatard meme. I don't know why you would. It's making fun of you. I mean, just because you start calling out Trump. Trump, even though it's half-hearted, doesn't mean that you're not still blind supporting of all of the agendas that's making fun of. And it says, do you get it? Do you get that? My audience is as big as it ever has. It's just simply not true, but he's still got a gigantic audience. The majority of my audience

Starting point is 01:25:42 is upset with Trump too, which is exactly, well, and by the way, the majority, I would agree with. But the rabid, huge highlight, those are the people that are attacking him for this that are blind supporters. But I'm the one telling you back in January, they thought that. And he was the one shouting me down. And then he shifted. So we were correct when we first said it right in the beginning that Trump's people were turning on him because he lied. Alex kept trying to gaslight them up until it was no longer, you know, even potentially

Starting point is 01:26:09 gaining him anything. Pretty easy to see, guys. But this is not the focus of my show. Okay. This one says, same kind of thing. This weird thing they're doing. Same thing. This is some kind of Alex Jones play, except in this one, he's the Jedi.

Starting point is 01:26:24 Pick a lane, guys. that's all it is, just kind of leaning into it. And he says, breaking, Magatard also knows, also known as, I guess those are the names for this guy, as Goy Slug has been invited to the White House to give Trump, Trump fashion and fitness advice. Like, he's really leaning hard and it like, we hate Trump now. We're going to make fun of him all the time. And it's kind of hard to hate him and then support his agendas, which is what he's basically doing. He says, keep helping get Dems elected, says one of his supporters who now turned on him because he's

Starting point is 01:26:55 Capture, audience captured. They'll censor you and then put you in prison, you stupid traitor. So, I mean, remember, Alex was the one shouting down people as traders who turned on Trump. Now he turns and he's not the same. And the lack of logic and principle is obvious. He says this is what I think is important. I'm literally just making a fun joke. I've been fighting the left for 32 years.

Starting point is 01:27:14 What a dumb thing to say. The left? As if it's one blob and they don't have different opinions? Like, does everyone on the right share the exact same front? No, we can see that. that we don't laugh at people pretending it's a left, right game and they're all bad and we're all good. It's about, again, the dumbest, most laughable conversation

Starting point is 01:27:32 in this entire thing. I've been fighting against that they, that idea, that group that is supposed to be, that they're Americans that are part of the whole that we're supposed to pretend or all the country. We've been fighting America for 32 years. That's what that says. Okay. Just because I've been critical of Trump does not mean I'm fighting for the Democrats.

Starting point is 01:27:52 And that's a fair statement, guys. just because I'm critical of Trump does not mean I support the Democrats. I've been trying to get Trump to wake up, he says, and stop listening to George Soros's people. Whoa, okay. See, he's trying to give you an art. You see, this guy supports Trump.

Starting point is 01:28:11 So he's trying to go, hey, wink, wink, I'm trying to support him still. But I can't say it out loud because I'm making fun of him. When you say I've been trying to get Trump to wake up, that means you don't. So if Trump has been seen as the evil, bad guy that's challenging all of what he promised, would the answer to be

Starting point is 01:28:26 Trump, please, go back to what you were. Trump, keep or trying to show him things to beat. He's a liar. He's a cheater. He is a genocide committed. Why, what do you mean get him to wake up and see? So a guy who steals from you, a guy who lies you about everything, a guy who double

Starting point is 01:28:42 crosses you, you want him to come back and start working for you again? I mean, how does, again, I don't even need to make it any clearer. That's dumb. And that shows you that he does still want to be seen as supporting Trump, but he wants to take both sides. He wants to gain from it all. Well, you know, it's just lazy. Like that's kind of, you know, I'll leave it there.

Starting point is 01:29:04 The Kushner-Sorrell-Trump connection, we just discussed, by the way. And so if he's going to talk about getting away from the Soros people, then explain for me, Trump, are Alex, why you supported him through the entire first administration. When all of those points were still there, dissent is just an ongoing extension of the larger point, guys. The point is that Alex continued to support them until it was too obvious to stop. or too obvious to continue. That's it.

Starting point is 01:29:27 So for him to go, they're bad now, you saw it then. So the answer is, why did you stick with them all the way now? Because it's not really what he's telling you. Now, to talk about Trump and Iran overlap, Eric Doudherty, one of these, like, you know, the rising stars in the stupid, the stupid fake news, you know, whatever the new media movement, the people that are pretending to be like the new media,

Starting point is 01:29:53 while they just go, whatever Trump said, rah, that's all they do. Eric Doughty, just it. in. President Trump posts something. That's it. That's called journalism today. Just in. Trump posted over there on that platform. And it's great. And we love him. Hashtag journalism. He says, they will never sleep again. He goes, I hope this message is intended for the deep state and communist traders. Clap, clap, clap. You hope? What? I hope it's not for me. Maybe he's getting nervous. You know, like, what do you mean you hope? Shouldn't that be the obvious? You're a propaganda. shouldn't you be like that's about going after the bad guys not like i hope that's not for us

Starting point is 01:30:30 i just think that's crazy like i'm telling guys this is all spinning out even like that's like that the data republicans who calls out the team because they felt like they were being set up like this is the rats fleeing the ship like they're all starting to feel this is getting out of control and so that's just my take on it but look at this post talk about tech and guys that's like nightmare nemo matrix alarming stuff that's like nightmare neo matrix alarming stuff right there. Trump posted that. Now, there's some going around that Trump didn't actually post, by the way. That happens every day. But these are real. They will never sleep again. Who? If you're talking about Democrats, that means Americans. He's saying Americans will never sleep again because

Starting point is 01:31:10 what? You're making technocracy because you exist because you're not going to leave office. I mean, how do you possibly not take this as something alarming? With weird like matrix drones with lasers behind you? This should keep you up at night. Even if it's, a joke. This is what he thinks. Or maybe even worse, that he's so tone-deaf doesn't realize that everyone that's even still on his side is screaming in the other direction of this dark technocracy. Or maybe he doesn't even care. Maybe that message is for all of us and he's supporting the Peter Teals of the world. You need to ask these questions, guys. Eric doesn't care. Eric will clap along while he's getting cuffed and put in jail. Trump's the best. I swear he'll

Starting point is 01:31:50 let me out tomorrow. And wake up rightly says, by they, he means everyone who isn't in from immediate loyalty circle on any given day. And then dot the dot, and then everybody, if it needs to be done. Or everybody, if it just benefits him or everyone, even if he's just tired that day, maybe it means everybody. Like, you're not going to be kept.

Starting point is 01:32:09 Like, these people that act like they're going to be supported because they sided with them. History everywhere shows you that's not true. Then, of course, you got Elon Musk. This is from Doge designer. A billion humanoid drones, he says, will be more productive. than all humans combined within 10 years.

Starting point is 01:32:30 Oh, wait, wait, wait. So you might think at first he's going, well, this many robots would be as productive of this many humans. No, it's not a benign point. What he's saying is within 10 years, which means two things. It's happening already.

Starting point is 01:32:43 And that his projection is within 10 years, he will have a billion humanoid robots. I don't know how you can misunderstand that. He says there will be, will be, at least a billion robots in 10 years. This is Elon, now, whether that's the case or not. He does this where he shoves what he wants as the foregone conclusion and then fakes it until he makes it and jumps his way in there. He does it every time. Tom says, oh,

Starting point is 01:33:07 so he's building an army. Now look, guys, even if he doesn't see it that way, that is what this is. We're talking about, I mean, like, I don't even want to reference some kind of movie, a dystopian movie because it makes it like belittle the point. The truth is, though, you can see a world in which these things, we're talking about AI, if you're talking about meshing, which is ultimately how you would argue these things would work. You could effectively control them. Like even if they're out there sweeping the streets, all of a sudden, you've got something else.

Starting point is 01:33:34 But nonetheless, take it aside from a government enforcement thing. My worry is government using these things in enforcement like they're doing everything else and it just becomes an alarming dystopian reality. But what if Elon Musk as an individual decides to capitalize on an insurmountable robot army that nobody can stand against? You see how stupid it even says to sound like how that sounds, like how that sounds out loud, it sounds ridiculous. But what's wild about it is it's not that far-fetched.

Starting point is 01:34:01 I think he's literally telling you they're building these things and in a future where there exists and suddenly one person could potentially be control of them. It's just a matter of whether they choose to, whether they are sociopathic enough to want that power. Now again, I'm not even saying I think that's where it goes. It's just kind of alarming with things like what he's posting, like with where we are,

Starting point is 01:34:21 that they're talking about robot armies and robot billions of, I mean, and okay, take you one other, one other point. Who's designing these things? What AI, what algorithms are managing these things? Are they going to agree with, are they going to be just order followers? Are they going to have opinion? Are they going to be programmed with certain things? Oh, you can't say Palestine.

Starting point is 01:34:42 Who knows? Realize that that's what it comes down to is who is implanting, who is creating the way. It's the same with the algorithms on these platforms. It's, or GROC or anything else. It's not just benign. They are the ones back there pulling the strings. and we have seen that already. That worries me.

Starting point is 01:34:59 Now on the idea of the larger, you know, kind of globalist direction, this is from six hours ago. RT, Trump unveils the new U.S. map. Now, you can argue he's making a joke. That's the whole game of how they do this. But aside from the post, it's clear he's been coveting these things.

Starting point is 01:35:14 He's been trying to get Greenland. I mean, look, this is what I always bring up. And it's just one point, but it matters, especially with the larger agenda. Guess who wanted Greenland? Peter Thiel. It's not even a joke. It's literally from February. A startup link to Peter Thiel wants to build the next great city in Greenland. Praxia. And it's not like just some tangential link. Like he's a huge proponent of this one, far more than at least publicly than Prospera, even though he is very much involved with that in the sense of the financial backing, despite what people want to scream out loud. Even then you can clearly prove that. The point, though, is that this is one part of it. Then you've got Canada, which you're hearing discussed today. So is it a joke or not? Either way, as Sam writes, say hello to the North American Union.

Starting point is 01:35:58 It's always been the plan. I agree, at least in some elements of the conversation, some larger direction. And that's only insofar as it leads to the larger global conversation. But as we discussed back in January 2025, as Israel's globalist ambitions become clear, look at where we are now, guys. Funny how we were getting shouted down for even calling at that, team sport Republicans, like Alex Jones, who was the one we were addressing at the time, were endorsing the North American Union.

Starting point is 01:36:25 He was praising the thing Trump was pointing to. Now he turned on him and now it's bad. Well, then why'd you call it good then? Because you're a fair weather follower? Who knows? And on top of that, guys, as Mel points out in, with meeting with Putin, actually realizing I forgot,

Starting point is 01:36:44 I don't remember exactly where it was. I think I read it, but I didn't write it down. Either way, meeting with Putin, Kushner and Whitkoff. as she writes, so Jared Kushner and Steve Whitkoff are now just in charge of U.S. policy, U.S. negotiations on Ukraine as well. What the hell qualifies them for that? I mean, for either one, well, at least Israel, we know that they're dire, like, art and Zionists.

Starting point is 01:37:10 So even though it's crazy they're there, it makes sense in the backward way of why they want them there. Well, in case when you understand what the Azov movement is and what Israel has been doing in the Ukraine, well, you understand probably why they're here too, because Israel, wants them there because Israel wants what's happening here to go a certain way. And Israel's clearly in charge as far as you've got my opinion. I think that's obvious in the large discussion. But as you could see, just in case you can see him, Whitkoff, Kushner, meeting Putin, sitting down.

Starting point is 01:37:40 I mean, guys, these people are not elected. These are advisors that shouldn't even be in the same room as these people. And on top of that, they've got incredible conflicts of interest that in of their own right are enough to stop previous administrations from allowing them to be involved. And Israel wants them there, so none of that matters. Going back to ethics, pledges and everything else, none of them have even tried. And the Democrats don't seem to care about that, do they? They'll yell, but I don't do anything.

Starting point is 01:38:03 It shows you that they don't really care. Now, what you get from this administration, which I've been saying from the beginning is desperation. And, like, pathetic, like weird, flailing ways. And I don't, I almost figure, even if they were as desperate as I think they are, I feel like they could do better than this. Now, I'm not talking about, like, the, well, actually, frankly, I shouldn't even say it's that good of AI because you could make this on rock pretty pretty frankly but the white house not just trump but the white house posted this in brightest day and blackest night no evil shall escape my sight let those who worship evils might beware my power the green lanterns

Starting point is 01:38:38 literally making a joke on a mar on green lantern and showing trump with a ring i would make sure it wasn't a different symbol but i mean what's the point of this i said remember when I was saying the beginning of this administration that it felt like Trump's team was like desperate and that it was showing in their talking points of propaganda? Yeah, so clearly I was wrong. Like making, I'm joking. It's like this is ridiculous. And like I said, all flash no substance.

Starting point is 01:39:09 What are you even saying here? What's the point? That you're cool because you like that you're pretending green lantern over? There's nothing. It doesn't show you anything. It doesn't even promote an idea. American manufacturing is what, that he's looking at it? I just think it's just, it's lazy.

Starting point is 01:39:27 And it's frankly embarrassing. And I'm thinking that's by design, guys. Here's another one that were the other day on the third. They've been doing a ton of these, these weird, like retro ones. The White House says it's time to level up, Patriots, something new dropping soon. And it's just like a weird level up graphic. I just said, yuck. It's just cringy, which is pretty consistent, left and right with people going to

Starting point is 01:39:51 talking about on these. And so my point is it's like this is just like sloping it out there. Just nonstop, just trying to, I guess just shift something, distract just enough. I really don't know. I don't think they have many choices right now. Daniel Davis deep dives. It is time to stop making excuses for Trump. Claiming everything's a joke. Joking about choosing to launch nuclear war is evidence of dangerous attachment from any basic level of understanding of his job. He's supposed to keep us safe for nuclear war, not spawn one. Another post that he put out showing Space Force. Look at the bombings on the Earth.

Starting point is 01:40:28 Now, yeah, pretend he's joking. Even a joke about that is insanely irresponsible for Trump as a child. Frankly, it's stuff like this that makes me think for very clearly that he's, like, that he's even aware he's not in control. I don't know. It's hard you read all of this. But if you can't look at that and realize this person is desks, desperately petty and small, like desperately needs to project his power and strength,

Starting point is 01:40:54 which means he has neither in a, like a real sense, not that he's got military. He's there. He can make things happen. One of the most powerful people in the world when it comes to that point. But what I mean is when it comes to individually as a person, he is a weak, petty, incompetent person. You can see it playing out in front of you. And it's not to say he hasn't had successes in his life.

Starting point is 01:41:13 But the point is when you're a billionaire, when you come from wealth, it's not as difficult as you may think to just keep doing things until you get what you want. And on top of that, you gain a lot by simply being a certain person. But it says it's time to acknowledge. And obviously it's not just this problematic one post. He's been obsessing with posting AI images of himself in all sorts of fantasy environments for months. And dozens today, which is something a commander in chief in his right mind wouldn't do. It's embarrassing.

Starting point is 01:41:45 It's belittling of what this is. And again, if you're only tuning in and you somehow think it's one-sided, Biden is just as stupid and just as corrupt. You know, it's just like, if I have to say it every 30 seconds, it's just lazy. And frankly, it shouldn't matter. The first thing that pops into someone's mind should not be, oh, you're only saying the obvious because you hate the other side. No, I'm saying it because it's obvious because they are that. They're cheating corrupt manipulators.

Starting point is 01:42:06 So too are the other people on the other side. It's just a government. They've correctly convinced you, you know, that poof, the devil doesn't exist, right? That's the whole idea, usual suspects. It's the idea they've manipulated you to thinking that there's two sides fighting instead of just one government laughing at you. But it says it's time to acknowledge President Trump is suffering serious cognitive decline. You can decide if you think that's true.

Starting point is 01:42:27 I think he's old. I think that's probably some level of factor. I just think he's a sociopath like the rest of them. He says, we allow this to go on unchecked to our collective peril. If we don't take constitutional measures, which, hey, I agree with that, go through the, go if you could actually get some kind of impeachment, but I would say the same should have been for Biden for Obama for Bush. So just because they're no longer in position doesn't mean we should only, we should fail. able to do what's Trump, right? But anyway, I agree in general, this is pretty embarrassing. Five times August, somebody who was supporting him until these principles drove him to turn on

Starting point is 01:43:00 the reality. I should say it clearly, he was one of the early people to really stand up and go, what Trump's not doing what he said. And he deserves a lot of credit for that. And it says, I just feel like the Golden Age of America, you know, joking, wouldn't involve this administration putting out so much AI slop in an effort to convince us that things are great. What a perfect way to say that. Because the reality would be, if we were all living great and happy life, we wouldn't need to be convinced that you were living great and happy lives. Pretty damn simple. Now, of course, what you get from Trump, flailing, I could give you 17 of the examples, here's an obvious one. We're going to look into the USAID stuff. Oh, you mean the thing you should

Starting point is 01:43:37 have done immediately? The thing you swore you were going to do because Democrats were corrupt and stealing for everybody and you made this whole narrative, that's what you told us, and then didn't care to do anything about it? I remember that. So, you know, Now he goes, we're going to do something about that. Let's talk about that instead of Iran or Israel. Let's talk about or Epstein. Let's talk about how I'm going to do something in the future. I don't know why people still fall for this.

Starting point is 01:44:02 And Elon Musk, how often are you talking to him? And have there been ideas that he has brought to you that you've said, oh, no, wait a minute, this is going a little too far. Well, many ideas. But look, he's done a great job. Look at all the fraud that he's found in this U.S. Yeah, zero. AID. It's a disaster. What the people, radical left lunatics, they have things that nobody would have even believed the whole thing with, uh, it's just, it's just impossible to listen to this

Starting point is 01:44:34 person. The bottom line, as you know, is it was never about that. And the bigger picture is the fact, as Mr. Saucer says, I see stuff like this all over Twitter. Just stop. We know nothing will happen. It was never going to happen. They're not going to follow up. The idea is clear, guys, if they're not doing anything, if Clinton's not in jail, if Obama and Bush and all the rest are not marching, they're not going to do. It's the insane reality is that we somehow think there's some background machinery that's, it's all working. Guys, they've said Obama was a traitor, like 13 times in the public. These are major accusations that Obama could sue them for, could literally go, but they doesn't. Because it's a game.

Starting point is 01:45:14 And the point of being, if you think he's going to be, if you said you have evidence to put him in prison about the election, about this or that, then why wouldn't it to happened already. Excuse me. Thinkups all of a sudden. Why wouldn't it have happened already? Who knows? Maybe it will in the future. I've been making this case about all these people. The reality is they want you to be talking about other things. And end of the day, it comes down to the fact that they will say whatever they need to say to get you to think that something is happening. And right now, with how much is going on, I think it's obvious they will scream anything to get you to look in a different direction. And I'll include this from the February,

Starting point is 01:45:47 were 2025, the shell game, USAID, which didn't go away. They didn't stop, just like they didn't stop vaccines. They didn't stop glyphosate. They didn't stop, you know, the beef conversation will get into. They lied about that too. It's just right to your face, just lie, lying, hoping you just go along because you're a blind follower. And that's his failure because he misjudged you. Enough of the majority of you clearly care about what was promised.

Starting point is 01:46:10 That's when I would have expected. And again, remember, it's closing down. They said, no, it's still there. still continuing under Rubio. Going forward, here is the meat conversation. Now, we talked about this under the mystery meat point. Massey says, contrary to rumors, Trump's executive order issued today does not implement mandatory country of origin labeling.

Starting point is 01:46:33 For beef, they're going to study the problem until after the election. And then they may do something about it. It's exactly what they've done before. Well, they'll stand up and literally frame it as we're doing the thing. and we're all going to step together. And then you read it, and it says, as he points out, that they're going to look into, like the idea of cannabis and studying,

Starting point is 01:46:55 so we're going to do this huge push about cannabis. And everyone said, yay, Trump's good for cannabis. What do you say? We're going to open this up to look. We're going to lower it just a small bit on the category, still legal, still can go to jail, and we're going to look at that so we can study it further.

Starting point is 01:47:08 It is the most studied substance on the planet, one of at the very least. We don't need to study it more. It was a lie to make you think things would happen. and when all he did was push it down the road. Same thing here. Authorities that may permit the establishment of mandatory country,

Starting point is 01:47:24 that's all it is. They're going to study it after the... They did this to make you think positive things for the midterms. And he's lying. Now, that's not whether or not you agree with the action. If the point is, they're not even doing what they said they were going to do.

Starting point is 01:47:35 They're gaslighting their own people. Think about how embarrassing that is. And same thing. He goes, Trump, fake jow out yesterday. He didn't implement country of origin labeling for beef. He signed an executive order. order to commission a study that will report back after the election and after we've imported 300,000 tons of foreign beef. See how dumb that is? So we gaslit you to think he's doing something

Starting point is 01:47:57 when by the time you look up, suddenly the beef's already there. Now it's too late. That's what I think's happening with axon and all the rest. Just getting it just to be distracted. So by the time you go, wait a minute, he lied to us. Oh, now you're already, it's too late. Now, who does it? That's a six-month process. I just, I get this sense. I've said it before that it's, right now it's scattering us, so we're not stopping what's coming. He says, I'm the only Republican who's actually voted to keep M. Cool. Here, a man standing behind Trump. He says, was

Starting point is 01:48:27 Farm Bureau lobbyist Zippy Duvall, who opposes mandatory country of origin labeling. Funny that. Wants to mandate RFID tags for cattle, defends the corrupt check-off program that takes money from farmers and supports beef regulations that block small processors.

Starting point is 01:48:51 That's the guy standing right behind Trump. See how that works? So he will gaslight you to your face and then sell you out to the highest bidder because that guy will make him money. That guy will make his friends money and that's how that works. But he'll sure as hell yell at the farmers

Starting point is 01:49:05 and say everybody loves him. And then guess what? Guess what comes after this? He'll stand up and make a statement about, oh, all the farmers that are hating me are the Democrats or all the ones that are, they don't understand what's good for them. not real MAGA. And that means all of them because they're all seeing through it, which is really

Starting point is 01:49:18 what's happening. Scott Jennings comes out to try to save the day and says, every Republican I ever voted for said they would shrink the government. Trump actually did it. No joke. That's what Scott posted. That was two days ago. Or yesterday, excuse me. Now what he's doing here, and I want to be very clear, I'm absolutely convinced that Scott knows he's lying to you. I mean, you watch this guy grift around on TV, it's very slimy manipulative. That's why he's there. What they did is talk about the idea of the workforce. So what happened is they fired a bunch of people for ridiculous reasons in many cases.

Starting point is 01:49:57 That is not represent the size of the government in a real sense. That's personnel. Those are rank and file, like not real. What we're talking about, which by the way is shockingly higher, Scott, and you know this, spending a federal government size, which is not. the same as people. It can overlap, but that's always doing. And how much you want to bet very soon, those hirings will go right back up. They're taking a momentary blip and saying, look at what we did. The federal government is bigger than it's ever been, and it's growing every second right now.

Starting point is 01:50:31 Spending on this government has been bigger. It's like a 40th street. I mean, the deficit is insane. I don't want to misquote it, but it's trillions. It's insane where we are right now. And every single metric is through the roof. And this jackass, wants to make you think that we're winning. Do you don't see that as desperate? I mean, guys, you have to realize, you read the comments. People know he's lying. How do you not see that as desperate? Why would you knowingly come out and do something the whole? I mean, he's not dumb. Economist will go, you're an idiot. Obviously that, but he did it anyway because they're desperate. That's my opinion. But it's just kind of sad, isn't it? Federal Government employees.

Starting point is 01:51:10 I mean, I shouldn't even need to present it all for you. You could easily see it. without question, the spending is dramatically higher. The size of what we're doing with the government, the new, I mean, I've been talking about, he's talking about removing bureaucracy. You might feel like that weirdly sounds like he's not taking, or if he's not letting you collect rainwater, guys, he's letting them dump stuff in your water. But even with that regulatory removal in that sense, it's still even bigger. The fascistic blend between these massive corporations, everything is growing in the wrong direction,

Starting point is 01:51:39 but Scott tells you he's winning. Yeah, he is. Just you're not winning. That's the point. And here's to make him look even worse. Because Scott's lying to you, just like percent is always lying to you. Donald Trump, August 2015. He says, when you have an $18 to $19 trillion in debt, we're way past that now.

Starting point is 01:51:58 Like what, like three times that? They need someone like me to straighten it out. That's what he said. Well, here he is on the sixth. Call she says, breaking. National debt is forecast to hit $47 trillion under Trump. You want, guys, the idea of the debt has absolutely exploded with Donald Trump. And no one's denying that.

Starting point is 01:52:22 Nobody's denying that. He just argues narratives, you know, whatever. It seems like Biden would say, COVID, whatever. I don't care. And those are factors. They clearly matter. In some cases, maybe it's not even in your control. It still doesn't change the fact that you promise one thing and another thing is happening.

Starting point is 01:52:35 And you've got 37 choices that have added to that number. So it's just a lie, guys. And they know it. And this is you, called him out. It says instead, instead, he alone will have added. added 18 to 19 trillion by himself by 2029, right? When you have that much in debt, they need someone like me to straighten it out. And what he meant was straightened it out so we could profit while we drive the ship or the,

Starting point is 01:52:57 you know, sink the ship. It's funny, you could actually think of it like that. Like, why did we assume he meant remove it? That's not what he even said, did he? He just said, working out, straighten it out. So as long as there's stuff in their pockets, we're all good, right? And maybe that's what he even meant. The Kavisi letter posted on the seventh yesterday says this is actually pretty wild to me.

Starting point is 01:53:18 Now, this gets into an overlapping level that I'm not as versed him. Catherine Alton-Fitz would be the best person to dive in with this. The current decline in U.S. bonds is unprecedented. And this is right now with what Trump is doing this country, it really is an insane level. 15 plus year treasuries have returned negative 2% per year on average over the last 10 years. their worst performance in history. This is also only the second period in data going back to 1936, where treasuries have posted negative 10-year annual returns.

Starting point is 01:53:52 By comparison, U.S. stocks have returned plus 15% per year on average, while commodities have returned plus 11% per year on average over the same timeframe. To put this into perspective, before the 2020 pandemic, Treasury's gained plus 9% per year on average over a 10-year period. Since the start of 2020, the popular bond tracking EFT, TLT has dropped negative 26%. With its biggest drawdown at 34% negative.

Starting point is 01:54:21 The bond market is no longer the safe haven it once was, if you even think it was in the first place. And it was to a certain degree. I mean, you could do what you want with that. Clearly, this has been kicking off since before this, right? But look at the core, look at the factor that I think is obviously interesting. the real drop started right when Trump came into office.

Starting point is 01:54:43 Collapse and then 2020, even further, and now more so with Trump now. I'm not saying that means one thing. For all we know, somebody did it around him. The point is, though, you can't deny the timings and the fact. There you are. But yet, Scott will tell you you're winning. Hashtag winning, well, everything is collapsing. Now, maybe he's stupid enough to think that.

Starting point is 01:55:02 Maybe that's the other option, too. But you can decide. Now, I want to get into some Iran conversation and some Israel overlap. that I think is very relevant. I thought this was interesting. So this is a post, a lot of people have been sharing, or posting similar images and doing the same thing, or showing them walking up and saying,

Starting point is 01:55:21 you know, no, they don't even hide it. It's okay. Well, so it's, I'm not going to go into the whole thing, you know, just because I think it's been very clearly discussed on the show. But it's the same conversation of Zionism versus Judaism. Now, you can't deny that there's Jewish supremacy on the Jewish Zionist side. That's stated as always, I'll include the Betselem article that discusses that exact thing about apartheid. This is an Israeli, the leading Israeli human rights.

Starting point is 01:55:46 Wow. That's being blocked now. What a perfect thing to see right now. Wow. I'll get it to come up before I talk about it. Wow. That's crazy. Your requested access to the website is forbidden.

Starting point is 01:56:05 You do not have permission to access this page. Well, guess what? We have it on archive. That's crazy, guys. See, look at where we are. This is actually a perfect show for that to come about. Here it is. January 2021.

Starting point is 01:56:18 A regime of Jewish supremacy from the Jordan River to the Mediterranean Sea. This is apartheid. And this is directly from Betzell and the Israeli human rights group. So it's not, it's just a simple point is that the idea of supremacy of any group, religion, ideology exists. It's out there. And it's very prominent when it comes to the Zionist side of this conversation. There's also tons of Orthodox Jewish communities.

Starting point is 01:56:39 Now, the majority in Israel is obviously on the side. of the Jewish supremacy and the Zionism, which includes atheism, even the founding Zionist elements like Herzl were atheists. So please understand that. Look it up. It's easily proven.

Starting point is 01:56:51 It shows you it's not about what they keep telling you it's about, guys. And even, that's why Orthodox Jewish communities, like the one I'm going to point to in a second, are out there screaming at the top of their lungs. Global organizations, that Zionism is not Judaism. They'll march in Israel and get beat up by the idea that's supposed to be the important arm for the Jewish state.

Starting point is 01:57:09 They're Orthodox Jews. And it just doesn't make any sense. if you pay attention. So, I'll include both of these, by the way. I'm going to look into this further. I'm wondering if I'm being blocked or if the site is down or rather the page is down, which either makes sense to me. Wild.

Starting point is 01:57:25 So Patriotic Blonde writes, yes, this is real. The White House, the 3rd of September, with J.D. Vance and a bunch of Orthodox Jews. So what's interesting to me, like, I mean, this, it's not a false thing to ask today. And don't be afraid of people calling you some, oh, you're racist. Are you? Do you hate them for being Jews? If not, then tell them to shut up.

Starting point is 01:57:47 Okay, because the point is that people gaslighting you and shouting you down for asking questions, even if you may think they're wrong. If you're, if you know who you are, don't let people gaslight you into being afraid to ask a question because they say it's wrong. If your intentions aren't, then tell them to shut up. The point here for me is that clearly there is an overlap,

Starting point is 01:58:04 so it's a valid question to ask whether or not these are Zionists and does that play a factor with the obvious Zionists? Zionist agenda that's right there twine with globalism and technocracy and the ongoing genocide all over the world. How is that not relevant? But as well, with that secondarily, just as equal, they could just be a Jewish organization. Now, because it's the White House and because it's everything super politicized, it's, I'm probably leaning towards Zionists. But the point is, I don't know that as a fact. So what's crazy to me is simply being with Jews in the White House does not mean one thing or the other. To me, there's plenty of

Starting point is 01:58:39 Jews out there that call out Zionism and are currently calling out the genocide. So that needs to matter, guys. Hopefully it matters to this audience. And Tori Jews is one of these groups who calls out very vocally what they're doing in Gaza, calls out what Zionism is not Judaism, that Zionism is a bastardization of everything. They're still all day, every day. And so what they say is, what's your problem? Because I get why they would say that, because is it wrong that they're Jewish?

Starting point is 01:59:05 And that's the way they would see that. To a lot of people in the conversation, that's where they're going. argue you're being played by the very people you think you're fighting, Zionists. But I think it's important because we need to be able to ask the question. Is that a problem? Would it matter if they were a bunch of Chinese people? Would it matter if they were a bunch of Muslim people? You know, whether it's ideology, whether it's race, whether it's religion.

Starting point is 01:59:27 Because all these things you do, the point is you should be able to go, does that matter? And not be afraid someone's going to call you a racist for asking whether that could mean the government or a group is infiltrating their mindset or maybe they're turning, you know, all that matters. But at the end of the day, I think it's important that we don't get tricked into thinking that that is the focal point, even though it overlaps. Because in the same argument, you could point out that the Christian Zionism, and that would mean every Christian is complicit. No, clearly not. Same point.

Starting point is 01:59:54 And the reason I bring it up is for a lot of reasons, because right now it's important to recognize that what Zionism is doing and what they're involved with and what they are influencing across this government is dark. It is very publicly bad. and that you can listen to what they say out loud. So I thought it was very interesting to find this story. This is a member of the IDF. That is an Israeli IDF member who turns out was also a member of ISIS. For those watching this audience, that's not going to be very shocking to you.

Starting point is 02:00:28 What's crazy is this is not that unique, quite frankly. In fact, I'll even play this because I've played this before. I might even have it pulled up over here. Yeah. Oh, no, that's the Zionism. One. I'll have it right here. This clip going back, it's like a C-stand clip. And what they're talking about is what the acronym is for Israeli secret services. And others, you tell the story about how you tried to find out what the, what they call the Mossad when they deal with publicly?

Starting point is 02:01:03 I thought it was a reasonable question, but the trouble is you can't pick up the phone book. There's no Langley in Israel that you can look up CIA or in our case, the Mossad. we thought we should ask, what shall we call it in English? You can translate the Hebrew words, as I said, Mossada's Institute. But when they write a letter to their friends in the CIA or the British intelligence, what do they call themselves? It took a while. It was a matter of asking the Prime Minister's spokesman.

Starting point is 02:01:27 The best you could do, because officially the Mossade is under the Prime Minister's office. And I think he sort of wondered why you want to know and all that, so we explained. And he came up with the Israeli Secret Intelligence Service. I mean, if it were to have initials, it would be I-S-I-S. Just simple words like that. Interestingly enough, kind of a British model. So, of course, even I've asked the point, like, why would they make it that obvious? Why would they even need the accuracy?

Starting point is 02:01:53 Especially if it's intelligent. Who knows? I mean, I've seen examples exactly like that in real life that do end up being, like, why would they, you know, who knows? Or maybe it's not a connection. Maybe it means nothing, and it's just a coincidence. But the truth is, as you can undeniably see if you've been paying attention, even remotely over the years, there is a connection here.

Starting point is 02:02:12 Now here is just the first story, then I'll go into the connection. Former IDF soldier from the Times of Israel, charged with training to fight abroad with Islamic State. September 2nd, 2026, I just find that crazy. It's very real. And even if you want to think it's a one-off, it's not. There's a clear connection here.

Starting point is 02:02:29 It's interesting to see. And what does that suggest? You know, that you have an alignment of ideology? That's supposed to be something we're aggressively supposed to ignore. It's what you'll find, again, And I'll even play this one because I do find these to be relevant more with these clips or at this point. There's a bigger connection here to the manufacturing of what has always been like false flag terrorism, which relates to the end part of the story today, which doesn't mean that there's not extremist in Muslims.

Starting point is 02:02:54 Just like there's extremist Jews and extremist Christians, they exist. And by the point, though, is that what we understand is terrorism today, the vests and exploding and all in which they frame is like the Muslim, it didn't start with that. And if you care to look deeper, we've talked about it before. here's the clip I played. I forget the guy's name. He's an academic. The point is that it's historically easy to see where these things align. And you can even make it clear where they pop up when they stop when certain circumstances change. But just remember, that's what the, you know, the origin. I mean, certainly the Zionists have used it and brought it in fact to the area. Terrorism, as we know it today, the planting of bombs and marketplaces

Starting point is 02:03:28 and so on and so forth, was in fact introduced into the Middle East by the Zionists in the 20s. But the net result of Zionist terrorism and violence in the first third of the 20th century has brought forth to my mind the anomaly, the horrific and unacceptable status in the Middle East today of the state of Israel, which is in fact an armed garrison state, which now exports more arms and distributes violence all around the world, vastly disproportionate to its size. I mean, in that respect, I think it's a, it's a horrible cycle of violence. But in it all, I think the Palestinian is the victim. There's no question about that. Interesting. Well, so if you're looking at this guy, you know, and also remember how often you'll find these Israelis, you know, like they, I've gone over this in depth before. They, they, I forget the name.

Starting point is 02:04:19 They even have a name for it when they literally dress up like Palestinians and go out and commit crimes. It's just, it's like, it's like their, you know, mosquito detachment or the neighbor procedure. like they have actual terms for things that are massive human rights violations and war crimes. That's the neighbor procedure was their human shields policy. I could play the clip again. I'm sure you've all seen it. It's very public. The UN's broken it down.

Starting point is 02:04:43 Every human rights group is pointed to it. But yes, but the other side is the one. You know, it's just so messed up. And, of course, anybody's capable of doing any of these things. The point is you have tons of evidence showing you not only do it, they have a policy for it, but accuse the other, right? So in this case, the point would be that you have this and a member of the IDF, who is also a member of ISIS,

Starting point is 02:05:02 and actively the point should be how often throughout history is this the case? How often in history do you have people that are being presented to you as Muslim terrorists or as Palestinians who are, in fact, operatives? The point is it has and does continue to happen.

Starting point is 02:05:19 I mean, we've even caught some of them, like when they raided in to kill people in the hospitals in Palestine. They were dressed up like Palestinians. And had they not been caught, you might not have known that. They might have blamed it on somebody else. And this is what they do.

Starting point is 02:05:30 like as the Israeli military, as the Israeli government, and very clearly continue to this day, as they commit terrorism all around the world and blame it on the other, as they are the ones responsible for this. And don't forget, it's not a one-off, guys. The very group they worked with to create the kill lines that were they called the humanitarian food project were ISIS. Here's the Heretz article for those that still pretend like this is not the obvious thing. This is from June 2025. The title is, what's wrong with that?

Starting point is 02:06:02 How Israel trained and armed and is ISIS-linked Gaza and militia? What's wrong with that? With these four supposedly innocent words, Benjamin Netanyahu caused additional damage. This is how Netanyahu reacted last week to Avedore Lieberman's revelation that the Israeli security establishment has been operating an armed militia in Gaza, whose personnel are affiliated with ISIS. Israel purposefully chose a group that is ISIS

Starting point is 02:06:35 to be a group pretending to be working with Palestinians as they shot them. The guy's name is Yasser Abu Shabab. We've talked about him. He was the GHF guy. ISIS affiliate. Netanyahu accused Lieberman of revealing a state secret. So in case you missed it, he's admitted it, he's owned it,

Starting point is 02:06:53 and he said, what's wrong with that? He said, but by confirming the information, the prime minister himself became a, an accomplice. Not accomplice. They're the ones managing the actual false flag. But that's how obvious it's always been. Or you can go back even further and recognize that time when literally on 2017, when Newsweek

Starting point is 02:07:11 reported that those ISIS fighters expressed regret for attacking Israel, even though they're constantly telling us how they want to kill all the Jews and that's what they're aiming for. But oops, sorry, we bombed you or hit you. We didn't mean to, quote, literally, quote, apologized. I just, who knows why these. come out. The truth is this is just sad and obvious. Or the ISIS patches that we saw on the deployments of people throughout Syria, the title as Israel further occupies Syria, Western-backed ISIS patch

Starting point is 02:07:41 wearing terrorists begin executions. These were live content. Look it up. You'll find this from Ten Eye magazine or Ten Eye reverse image. It's literally from when they were invading Syria and it was the U.S. and Israel, it's on this. This video is in the show notes, a guy with an ISIS patch, executing Syrians. With, you know, the terrorist. is Jolani, who they put in charge. Shocking, like it's not obvious. This one's from 2026. March, ISIS, Al-Qaeda, was created by the U.S. and Israel.

Starting point is 02:08:09 It's an open secret. If you care to look further, it's very, very, very easy to prove. Now, on that note, before we get into some bigger points about, actually, I think I'm including, that's right. I want to go into one point about the religious discussion before we finish with Ron. This clip's interesting, and I did, I did check this. I couldn't figure out who created this clip.

Starting point is 02:08:29 but the information is accurate. Earth hippie postered this. He says, did you know this is how Israel brainwashed as Christians? At least in the case of the clip and the content, which is in this case, this is what they did. Paid to target phones inside of American churches. Because that's how much they respect you. They secretly manipulate your content to trick you into liking them.

Starting point is 02:08:51 Sort of like Trump uses fake AI content to make you believe you're happy when you're not. You know, because it means you're happy. Israel paid for a plan to put a digital fence around 300 American churches. Every phone inside during Sunday service would be tracked and hit with ads. The plan is on file at the United States Department of Justice. It is on file because anyone paid by a foreign government to influence Americans must register with the Justice Department. The company that registered show faith by works.

Starting point is 02:09:24 Now, I'll go back a second. Remember, that's if they want you to see it. That's if they're registered under FARA and if the U.S. government cares. So for whatever reason, this is end up on the record. I mean, it's not all encompassing. There may be somebody in the department that thought that was the right, you know, who knows? The truth, though, is don't forget that there's tons of these that happen where they're not registered, groups that pretend to be U.S. companies and so on or other entities.

Starting point is 02:09:45 It's just important to know that. But nonetheless, this was registered, so it's very clear and easy to prove. So why did the U.S. government allow that? And why wouldn't they notify the Christians that they're being spied on by a foreign government? might kind of matters, doesn't it? It is on file because anyone paid by a foreign government to influence Americans must register with the Justice Department. The company that registered, show faith by works,

Starting point is 02:10:12 was a six-week-old California outfit run by a political consultant. Its client, Israel's Ministry of Foreign Affairs, the Israeli government's foreign office. A geo-fence is a line drawn on a map around a building. Every phone that crosses the line is marked and the ads follow it home. I just want to stress again, this is something that your government allowed a foreign government to do to you. I say this often, but it's like this alone, this one thing should be enough to change your mind entirely about who these people are. Not let alone the million data points you've gone over in my career.

Starting point is 02:10:53 Is this, it's just wild to me. Israel's Ministry of Foreign Affairs, the Israeli government's foreign office. A geo-fence is a line drawn on a map around a building. Every phone that crosses the line is marked, and the ads follow it home. The filing's job description. Quote, geofence the actual boundaries of every major church in California, Arizona, Nevada, and Colorado, and all Christian colleges. during worship times. Track attendees and continue to target with ads. Every church is named.

Starting point is 02:11:31 219 in California, 38 in Arizona, 32 in Colorado, 14 in Nevada. Black churches, Spanish-speaking churches. The filing counts nearly 4 million Christians in reach and expects to win over more than a hundred thousand of them. The goal, quote, increase positive associations with the nation of Israel while linking the Palestinian population with extremist factions. Make Christians like Israel. Make them see Palestinians as terrorists. The filing was made in September 2025, with Israel's first payment already in the bank. The churches on the list had never been asked,

Starting point is 02:12:20 one church in Colorado answered, quote, we did not know about this, we did not consent to this, and we are not participating in this. By late November, the consultant who wrote the plan said he had dropped the fence. Israel's payments kept coming.

Starting point is 02:12:39 By March, more than two and a half million dollars. The list is real. 303 churches, chosen by a foreign government, without asking any of them. Nobody asked the Christians. Nobody asked the Palestinians. It's just like that that's such a crazy thing.

Starting point is 02:13:11 Like the very point of that is so public and so on your face, just wild. And as somebody rightly points out in the chat, Trump makes it easier for foreign governments to secretly operate U.S. companies. It was an executive order he did a couple weeks ago. And it very clearly then removes, Like so in this case, though, here's the important part. That was the Israeli government publicly paying a group to do this. So the point in the chat, though, is that arguably this Israel in the future,

Starting point is 02:13:41 which by the way, not arguably, they're literally doing it as we speak. I've already showing you examples of it. Just calling U.S. You know, like Toka suddenly as a U.S. company because Greg, what's his name is now the CEO, or what they try to do with Comframe or like all these examples, they just shove a U.S. person in front and then just pretend. And with this executive order, now there's not even, paperwork that shows that anymore.

Starting point is 02:14:03 Like they're creating the illusory nature of what, and Israel is the most known for that in the world. They publicly bragged about how they create fake companies to affect the supply chain and manipulate foreign powers. Wild. I just, you know, it's as Americans, like, how do you think, I don't care if it was China, if it was Russia, like should make it,

Starting point is 02:14:21 your government allowed a foreign power to pay someone to trick you into thinking certain things. I mean, if that was another government, that U.S. would be calling that treason, We'll be calling that war acts, not with the Israel, though. Not especially even as they're attacking the very group that this administration pretends to support. So on the point of Israel, I think it's important to lay out two facts before we overlap this with Iran as well, but talking about what we just discussed. Middle East eye, Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu said, and there's a clip in Hebrew, on an interview with I-24, very public, that is intention from October 7.

Starting point is 02:15:04 was ultimately to wage war with Iran, Iran, and expand its operations into Gaza, Syria, and Lebanon. He is throwing it in your face. I mean, it's almost like he's pushing to see how far Trump will just, like how much Trump will just take and be quiet. You have to understand, to him, for him to publicly come out and say that October 7, which, by the way, we can literally prove all the way back then was something they knew was coming and allowed to happen or literally manufactured. You have a deniable reality of October 7.4 knowledge in the Hannibal Directive, June

Starting point is 02:15:37 2024. Only more evidence has come out, guys. It's not even worth debating anymore. People that are still trying to shout you down for understanding how easily seen this is. It's like trying to pretend the COVID shots are safe. It's embarrassing. It's laughable. So a point for him to say that October 7, that he somehow already was intending to

Starting point is 02:15:57 roll this into Iran, to take. takeover gods of Syrian Lebanon? Like, you know, you realize that proves his narratives were all lies. We already know this. But how would you have already been aiming at Syria and Lebanon if the point was freeing, getting Hamas out of the way and freeing the Palestinians? He lied. Shock, I know, right?

Starting point is 02:16:16 Netanyahu said he believed on October 8 the next day that Israel would, quote, change the face of the Middle East, which, by the way, he's been advocating for for 50 years, describing his objective as confronting Iran. Iran, which no one's talking about, I mean, they tried to conflate Iran with Hamas. It's not the truth. Nobody bought it. And it was always there, though. Iran was the focal point of the larger Middle East, greater Israel agenda, which he,

Starting point is 02:16:42 and he called for the head of the octopus, cutting off its arms, talking about Iran, which is not the case. The remarks add to claims that Israel and Netanyahu knew Hamas's attack plan before October 7th, which is very easy to prove, guys. You have people on these towers literally trying to get them do something and they told them if they keep reporting it, they'll go to jail. That's an actual statement coming from Israeli media, but they let it play out. Now, you could argue it's because they wanted to do it so they could have an excuse. That's one of the theories, either way. Other, and on top of that, they let people die, and then they killed their own people, which is all on the record at this point.

Starting point is 02:17:15 Other claims suggest that the Israeli military's use of the Hannibal directive that day was to increase the death toll to garner wider international support. That may sound dark, but these are dark people, guys. And they, if they're willing to kill their own people, any reason. Why would that be any harder to swallow? Because they did, and we can prove it. Critics on social media alleged that October 7 was deliberately allowed or used to trigger a wider regional war to reshape the Middle East, Greater Israel Project. That's where we are now. I mean, he's admitting this stuff basically in his own interviews. So I'll include the Hannibal directive. But then secondarily, about Iran, here's what, here's what Vance said in an interview.

Starting point is 02:17:55 And I think it's very important with what we discussed, the targeting of Christians by the Israeli government, and what they're saying to people in the military, which you already know, but in case you haven't, this might blow your mind. But first, here's what Vance had to say. I'm trying to focus on is doing as much of God's work as possible right now.

Starting point is 02:18:16 And if that leads to the end times, okay? Okay, right. If that leads to the end times and, you know, all good. Trying to do what, and what he said again, it was um i'm trying to focus on is doing as much of god's work god's work god's work i guess is genocide and you know lying to people gaslighting about the iran war you know starving people around the world allowing torture and rape and murder you know that's god's work according to these

Starting point is 02:18:43 monsters now everyone trying to play this game where vance is totally not in line with trump you're just a ridiculous person vance whether he is agreement with what they're doing has backed what they're doing. And he's been standing along Trump from before this even started with Iran, telling us why Iran needs to be taken out. It's obvious. I mean, Tucker and Alex, afraid to frame Vance is sort of like the one who didn't want Iran to happen. Guys, he's on the record before this openly supporting Trump's logic. I just don't know why people can't. It's just lazy. So he wants you to believe God's work, which you should be disgusted by that he would even say that out loud. And then it brings on the end times, then okay.

Starting point is 02:19:24 Are you casually talking about end times prophecy? Okay. What I think is super important here is not that criticizing bad or good, it's just simply to highlight the, as I said, you do realize this is not what Iran is claiming to be fighting for. As Heg Seth already tried to do, about a month ago or more, he came out in an interview and said, Iran believes it's fighting for some kind of end times prophecy.

Starting point is 02:19:47 They don't. You can look for yourself. They're not saying that. They're not, they don't claim to believe that. I'm not saying they're not religious and they don't have a theocracy. My point is they're not arguing to be fighting to bring on in end times. They're not. So why did Hakesas say that?

Starting point is 02:20:02 I think it's quite obvious because he knows that we're picking up on the fact that they believe that. So he has to deflect because he knows that we think that's crazy. Let that sink in a little bit. Then I said, yet we are told Iranians are the extremists while the Israeli government openly says that they are fighting to bring about their end times prophecy. openly. It's all, they're literally trying to genetically engineer a red heifer, which is part of their untimes prophecy, which still they can claim that that means that they're there.

Starting point is 02:20:33 Very public. And Pete Higgs-eth told the U.S. military publicly that they were fighting for Armageddon to bring on the end times and that Trump was the profit to do it. This is not a joke. I still, I felt like going through this briefly again because it feels like nobody's really absorbed this outside of our communities. and here he is going, well, you know, end times, no big deal. I mean, this is not about good guy, bad guy either.

Starting point is 02:20:58 You can argue Ron is just as guilty of things, but it is not clearly for them about some kind of prophecy. So one group being driven by some kind of prophetic design that's not about what you want or care about or voted for. And the other side is fighting for whatever you want to fill in the blank with, but my point is they're trying to project that kind of madness on Iran. It speaks volumes to me. Now, here is a post from March.

Starting point is 02:21:22 commanders accused of framing Iran at war as biblical mandate. What's wild to me is when I checked today as of today, now a single one of them has talked about this. There's been denials and deflections, but not Hegsseth, not Trump. None of them have even commented on this. And that will only sound crazier if you haven't heard the story as we read through this. You're telling me not a single media person has been like, hey, did you say it was Army? Why not?

Starting point is 02:21:50 I thought the left media hated them and would like to call them out. Don't they hate their religion? I mean, you have to see how clearly these things can be reined in from all sides of the conversation. It says, oh, and it says, for Jesus's return. And that's not about, you know, saying it's fake or anything else. Not even getting into my personal beliefs. Most of you know my religious beliefs. It's about the fact that they would say that and use it, true or not, in the sense of a general futuristic point,

Starting point is 02:22:20 to cover a genocide or rather ongoing illegal war that's literally targeting civilians or working with a group to do that who's also committing a genocide. Hard to believe that's God's work, guys. An organization that has been fighting against religious extremism in the United States, which we should all be supporting,

Starting point is 02:22:40 fighting against religious extremism of any kind, should be the point. Sort of like the flock camera. You see how that works? They get you focusing on the one, you miss the rest of it. Right? So they want you going,

Starting point is 02:22:49 it's only the axons. and we mixed the rest. Like, that's the idea. All of them are bad. All extremism should be fought. United States military. They've been fighting extremism in there for two decades. And they've reported, as of this was in March, more than 200 complaints since the

Starting point is 02:23:07 Saturday of the day before, initial strikes against Iran with members, well, I said that weird anyway. The point was that since the strikes, with members across all services claiming that high-ranking officials, high-ranking officials, are tying the mission in Iran to a Christian prophecy. That complaint, excuse me, was made by non-commissioned officer and provided to the Military Freedom Foundation, which from Saturday morning through Monday evening received and logged more than 110 complaints about commanders in every branch of the military. That's insane, guys.

Starting point is 02:23:47 and I just think it's wild how nobody wants to talk about this. And this is for months ago, every single branch of the military, hundreds of military personnel, they're like, and so it wasn't coordinated. You can't call it some off. These people are from all over the military calling on a couple, like a 48-hour period going, hey, I'm complaining that they're telling us we're fighting Armageddon.

Starting point is 02:24:07 That's alarming. Now, the number, as of the Tuesday that followed, doubled. So, 400 plus, it's like insane. Now it says, quote, this was when they were quoting before, it's well in excess of 200 complaints and well in excess of 50 installations that are complaining. They are continuing to come in everywhere. Who knows how many by now?

Starting point is 02:24:34 A Pentagon spokesperson when asked about the complaints and the ties to the ongoing mission in the Middle East did not directly respond to the question. Instead, they referred military.com to Heggseth's remarks made Monday about the intentions. So you've deflected and lied and ignored the question. Nobody has commented. That's alarming as hell.

Starting point is 02:24:56 Okay? Another follow-up. Lawmakers want DOD, Heg-Seth, investigated for these claims. But guess what they do? Nothing. This is from months ago, guys. Oh, you want them to be investigated. And did they try to get them investigated?

Starting point is 02:25:09 No, they didn't. They yelled about it and then moved on because they didn't actually want that. They want points. More than two dozen Democratic members of Congress who ultimately did nothing, are requesting an internal investigation, requesting to whom? Aren't you the ones that initiate that?

Starting point is 02:25:25 Couldn't you get that going yourself? But they yell to the sky and they say, do something, people. And then we're like, well, you're the ones that are supposed to do something. It's sort of like when you get, what's her name? I'm forgetting all of a sudden,

Starting point is 02:25:37 the one with the black hair that's like the kind of Trump supporting tangential maga person. I don't know. She comes out and she does that all the time. Like, we can't allow this and we need to fight. Like, lady, that's you. You're the one.

Starting point is 02:25:48 do it. You're not on the side. You're not like the fight, you know, the rebels fighting the deep state. You're the power. You are literally the empire and you're doing, it's just, it's so, it's Elon Musk calling out the side. You know, you are the problem, guys. They're requesting an internal investigation into the Department of Defense regarding claims of uniformed officers that commanders have painted the current war in Iran as one rooted in Christian biblical prophecy. Now, what's funny about that is from Israel's side, they would call it a Jewish biblical prophecy. And those things are different in very important ways, whereas one sees the West collapsing, the other in reverse. So funny how they are ultimately fighting for a different endpoint.

Starting point is 02:26:31 But maybe that's not the truth. Maybe that's what they tell these people. They name it Christian when they tell the Christian military or people that, you know, maybe. And in reality, they're fighting for something different. I think that's more in line with the reality. A complaint shared by an anonymous, non-commissioned officer to the Military Religious Freedom Foundation claim that they were told that Iran was, this is crazy, the Iran war is part of God's plan and that Donald Trump was, quote, anointed by Jesus to light the signal fire in Iran,

Starting point is 02:27:02 to cause Armageddon and mark his return on earth. Guys, that is what a religious extremist looks like. Now, I'm not talking about somebody who believes the future potential point of that happening, but they believe that Donald Trump, insanely that Donald Trump of all people is God's chosen point person to bring on the end times. A man who is covering up the Epstein files, somebody who is literally lying to you every day about what he does, who cheats on golf, you know, whatever the stupid.

Starting point is 02:27:30 Come on, guys, and they either believe it or they're trying to get you to. They are dangerous people. Do not pretend this undermines your beliefs in Christianity or whatever else to recognize that they're insane. And that's not what's happening right now. I mean, it's just not that you, if you believe that your Christian beliefs are embodied by that person, then you are lying to yourself or somehow lost in some weird bubble, because that's not who he is. Logged more than 200 similar complaints across 50 installations. He says the accusations, which received no direct response from the Pentagon,

Starting point is 02:28:02 have drawn widespread attention. Yes, widespread attention. And then nobody did anything. Nobody cared. No media talked about it outside of independent, you know, military. I would argue is mainstream, but in the sense of, you know, the main Fox, CNN, larger, is ignored. I think that speaks volumes by itself. Now, don't forget as well on the second point that, you know, we went over the of Netanyahu

Starting point is 02:28:32 for knowledge, October 7th. The other one is, again, we already showed you, the fact that he already, and he just said this, quote, it took a long time to get the U.S. to come to its senses, but I finally got it to attack Iran. due to my influence over its leaders. Guys, he just publicly said that on Channel 14 like a week ago. If you somehow miss that, he's bragging to the world that he got the U.S. government to do this. Now, that tells me right there that either Trump has no ability to stop this and he's had just blindly adherent to what Netanyang wants

Starting point is 02:29:05 or that there is a schism in the sense that Trump is trying to pull away because he's drowning in all of this, but trying to do so without making it publicly obvious. And now Netanyahu is just pushing in the, you know, rubbing salt in the wound. You know, embarrassing it is for him, for him to come out and be like, I did it. I got them to do that. For all this time, I've been trying to get all these American presidents to do it. None of them would, but I got Trump to. You realize how embarrassing that is for him and how dumb that makes him feel if that's the case.

Starting point is 02:29:35 So who knows? Netanyahu admits he controls Trump and U.S. politicians. Bombshell, hardly. but telling you that for 20 or you know what i've been doing this for 15 years almost the whole time yeah you shouldn't say that i mean the discussion has been there but my understanding of it involves a lot but early on it was clear to me that these people were not what they appeared to be in the sense of the governments now also worthy of note this comes from march 7th same similar time frame don't forget how we started this mike prisner broke the story

Starting point is 02:30:11 that they were deploying people before they were telling us they were deploying people, and they told them it was a training mission. Do we not clearly now see that they knew they were going to do this? They lied to American military personnel. They literally lied to them, just like they lied and have them stuck on those terrible ships, because, you know, as I wrote, in case you missed it this year or earlier, apparently a good number of U.S. troops have been saying that they won't fight Iran for Israel. Then, because that was going around, reports of Trump admin literally tricking the soldiers.

Starting point is 02:30:41 telling them to their faces. It was a training mission and then deploy them. Now, there's a follow up from Mike showing that this account, it's back now, was censored. Why? Because it was calling out the point. It was telling you, look, they were being, and they got censored, because Twitter was playing the role it always does.

Starting point is 02:30:59 Now, it is back now, but they effectively suppressed that role, or that story. Interesting, isn't it, that they lied to the American military to tell them they were training, get them out there, and then a lot of them were killed? Now, this is from the Unz report, just to kind of point it out. And this is from, they wrote this in August 25th. What now after losing the Iran war?

Starting point is 02:31:21 Now, I think it's important to think about where they are right now. I know people are debating this, but guys, I mean, you have to admit to yourself, if there was another choice here. And look, let me put it this way. If you're going to pretend that the only thing keeping this going is that Trump is somehow refusing to take the action further, which I've seen people frame it, oh, the only is just Trump just doesn't want to go that far because that's how bad they are. and he refused it.

Starting point is 02:31:44 What do you mean that far? You mean civilians? You mean bridges and hospitals and schools? They've been that far your entire life. Trump, your entire life. So the game of saying somehow the reason that they have, like that all they had to do is just bomb the hell out of them. They would win, but they don't do it because they're good guys.

Starting point is 02:31:59 That's so insane to me. You're living in Plato's key. You're watching the shadows in the wall. The truth is obvious. They're targeting civilians. But what's crazy to me is that this keeps going. and I think what's obvious is that it's easy to see because they've lost. If they were able to push this, they would.

Starting point is 02:32:18 Now, that doesn't mean something could shift. Another country could jump in and change the dynamic, right? Who knows? But as it stands right now by deductive logic, it's obvious that Iran is the upper hand and that Donald Trump and Israel can bomb, but they are now recognizing it's not having the effect they thought it did because Iran was prepared for all this.

Starting point is 02:32:36 And that when they respond, it's devastating for them every time. and they're running out of munitions and the world's turning on them and they're losing money. I mean, it's just a cascading problem series of problems. So at this point, and he wrote on August 25th, I agreed then. I think it's the same thing now. They've lost. I think it's obvious. And what they're trying to do is get this to a certain point.

Starting point is 02:32:57 And by the way, we were saying this in the first couple of weeks, then it felt like that's what they would do. You know, yell victory and move on, which is not in the cards anymore. But at this point now, try to get it to where the situation levels to a way to where you can argue you got some kind of a concession, you know, just something to bury the fact that you've utterly lost. For a moment, they tried to reset the table and say, it's about the straight and reopening the straight. It's like, no, no, you guys can't, you're in the middle of failing in your first objectives. You can't then pretend it's about something that you, by the way, had before this started. And even then, they're not going to get that anyway. But they realize that very quickly.

Starting point is 02:33:30 We can't just reopen the straight. It's not simple. Oron's not going to give us that now. So now we put up two different promises we're going to fail to deliver. So the question is, what do they do next? I do genuinely worry that that could drive serious action. I don't say that to worry people, but it is just whether it's 1% or 99, it's certainly possible that Israel could use a nuke or something crazy like that.

Starting point is 02:33:54 I pray that doesn't happen. But that seems to be the only kind of deviant, challenge to where this current stalemate has gone. Or again, save for other countries, but I just don't see that happening. I feel like everyone recognized the toxic nature of what this is. So I think where this goes is pretty clearly that they are going to try to shake the board up up to hope this ends up in a way where they can back away without looking too stupid.

Starting point is 02:34:20 So what you get, again, the propaganda ridiculous people like Eric Dowdery that come out, this was today. This is not a joke what he posted today. The Iranian regime is panicking. You realize I've literally heard, I should have remembered to do this. I bet you we could copy that exact sentence and go back and look. and he's probably made that statement every week since this started, right? Or Trump, they're begging for a deal.

Starting point is 02:34:44 We've heard 11 million times, but not the truth, though, clearly. But just in, whatever Trump told me, whatever Trump yelled, and I'm repeating, the journalist, and massive quote says, after Scott Besant reveals. So Iran's panicking after Scott Besant reveals that they only have 30 million barrels of oil left. Wait, so as if they didn't know. that? How do you make sense of that? So Scott says something that they know and they panic because he says it out loud. Why would they panic about people know? I mean, I guess the argument then that the cat's out of the bag, they're losing. Well, isn't that what Trump's already saying? Trump's been

Starting point is 02:35:20 publicly claiming that. I don't even think these people think about what they write. They just repeat what they're told. But at the end of the day, the question is, is that even true? It could be. But it's just this weird framing. And so he goes, now lashing out and threatening to launch an exclusion zone. No, only you're a child. that's wrong. We'll go through what's actually happening about how clearly what they're doing as a response to what happened about the, it's just tiresome. But sent just going full economic assassin mode. Oh, you mean like maximum pressure? Or is it now maximum, maximum pressure? How's that going to work out? Gas lines are surging,

Starting point is 02:35:53 inflation, rampant, yeah, you mean you're destroying their country and hurting innocent people? Yeah, we know that. We know that, Eric. Clear. Troops aren't being paid. And some leaders, are you talking about the U.S. government? Now, whether or not Iranian troops being paid, it's certainly possible. Yeah. They're being attacked in a thousand ways that are basically illegal. So maybe they are. But the idea that somehow Iran is in like this weak position is fanatically stupid. They're doing whatever they can to make Trump team look like they're winning,

Starting point is 02:36:23 even as most people that were on that Trump team are no longer on that Trump team. Quote. And I'm only to bet you it's mostly just about the fact that they get, you know, I mean, look, this is actually crazy. Check this out. So this guy who has. A million followers. Post this today.

Starting point is 02:36:43 Seventy-9,000 views. Now, you go back and look at his content. Now, this could be suppression too. I'm not going to say, who knows how this thing work today? But I believe it's because the people that nobody, the massive team that was like Trump, Trump, Trump, are all turning on him now. So he gets a shocking lower decrease in engagement.

Starting point is 02:37:01 Because they're going, well, that's just dumb. That's not true. They're all thinking Trump's lying to them now. But this guy will keep going to town because that's what he's supposed to do. two million barrels per day blah blah blah okay well okay economic dee day is still ongoing right i mean how embarrassing like nobody really bought that nobody really leaned into that even ron laughed about it anyway who knows maybe they were fronting but like i keep saying we'll go forward a week and we'll be able to tell

Starting point is 02:37:27 just like every other one of these and every other one before eric is being shown to be a fool trump's being shown to be lying it's the same cycle and they just keep doing it you know jessey waters laughs about how clearly they've won and ron's going down and then it goes on for another three months. It's like, and Jesse had a smug little smile. And it's like, who knows why they keep doing it? They're paid to, I think. But Midas Touch makes a good point here and says, here's a list of Scott dissent's wrong predictions and or promises that literally never happened. So as he's going, Scott said this and it's all coming down. Well, guess what Scott said a ton of things that literally were proven to be false? You know, read through them. It's all stuff you know for yourself.

Starting point is 02:38:04 Like the promises what Trump said would happen, lowering costs, you know, they're lying to you. Or at least they're giving you what they want you to hear and then don't care. Now, Iran's minister says Iran kept oil exports flowing during the ongoing back and forth we're going to get into now, despite the strikes on Card Island. Now, of course, they could be lying. Certainly, but we should always ask that question everything. But as I said, if we go for a week and it turns out that that oil did go out and we'll be able to tell by numerous factors, then we should go back and go, Eric, you're an idiot. Why'd you listen to them? Why do you always repeat them? Or go to Bessence account. Say, why are you lying, Scott? Go to do.

Starting point is 02:38:39 to Trump and say, you made that up. People do, but just recognize how consistent this has been. Now, Robert put out a great episode of foreign policy with Robert in Lecash on the third. Trump presses self-destruct button with Iran for Israel's sake. It's a great breakdown. If you didn't know he's doing this show called Foreign Policy with Robert in the Cash, it's usually about 20, 30 minutes. And he goes over just kind of what he thinks about what's happening.

Starting point is 02:39:05 He does a great job. He's very insightful. And so here, he's talking about a lot of factors, but large, Trump's shift recently and the main point is that he's he's sabotaging U.S. interest and even himself at the time for Israel's sake. And I think that's pretty damn clear. It's a good episode. Check it out. Now, on the second, we're going to go back just there briefly to go forward to today to show you kind of the last series. This is from Detroit News, U.S. Pounds Iran. And by the way, you'll find an interesting, consistent nature of both of these where it's

Starting point is 02:39:34 easy to see the series of events, which will make clear to you. But the way that they start it is always making it feel like it was a, you know, a fair and even exchange or like they both start at the same time kind of a thing. It's weird. And there's reasons, I think, for that. U.S. pounds Iran, the title says, Tehran strikes back at bases in biggest exchange since July. So here's what starts.

Starting point is 02:39:55 Iranians and their Arab neighbors were plunged back into war on Wednesday by the biggest exchange of fire between Tehran and Washington since July, with U.S. forces striking Iran's southern coast and Iran firing an American basis across the region. Now, I just think, now this one's less than the other one, but it's still kind of of like in the exchange of fire. I guess you don't have to start with the first point, but it makes it feel as if it was some kind of an ongoing back and forth and not the reality,

Starting point is 02:40:18 which was that there was basically a pretty big lull here, and the U.S. just bomb stuff again. Now, that's a very important thing to see. Now, yes, they're at war, despite them pretending they're not. That's such a dumb argument. As I reported in the last couple of shows, they're now trying not to pay out resources to American military that were killed because it's not a war.

Starting point is 02:40:37 That's not a joke. They're really doing that. office is trying to fight for them within the government, by the way, but who knows if it'll happen? The Trump administration is saying we're not going to pay out certain benefits to Americans that were killed because those benefits are only built out during wartime and we're not at war, even though Trump has called it a war like 11 times. I just, they hate you, guys, they hate you. So in this case, the exchange is not how this went down. The United States threatened more devastating, devastating strikes. Iran accused Washington of hitting a wedding party, killing five people,

Starting point is 02:41:09 and winning dozens. That's the first like series of openings. That's not the way that wins. So the U.S. military, which is where this started after the Lull, said it struck air defenses, radar systems, maritime assets. And yes, but it says mine laying capabilities in communication sites. So who, they bombed civilian locations within this. And it's, that was publicly discussed and largely why they responded, one of which was a wedding. Another was a, I forget what it was.

Starting point is 02:41:36 There was a building that it hit and it killed a bunch of civilians. very public. So whether they meant to or not, whether Israel gave them data or not, you know, gave them false intelligence to make them do that or not. Or who knows, the point is that that happened. And you can argue they're in an ongoing war. But the main point is that there was supposed to be some wool where they claimed they were working something out. Didn't Trump say the bout the straight were working on a deal? And then he got embarrassed because he wasn't involved in the deal.

Starting point is 02:42:00 And everybody found out that it was Oman and Iran working on a deal. And Trump was pretending to be involved. Again, how do you not see that as like, like, I don't know, shamelessly. desperate. And he, you know, so the point was that he wanted you to think they were a seller of a deal in the works. And then they bombed. Why? Why did they bomb? Because I think it's clear that they don't want that to work out. I said it last time too. They don't want Oman and Iran to create a settled deal, which is basically done, I think. So it becomes clear that the only thing stopping it is Israel and the U.S. and what that becomes more clear than ever,

Starting point is 02:42:32 or what it makes clear more than ever, is they are the belligerents. They are the only ones that are refusing in a very childish way. But we're really, We get what we want or we're going to hold the whole world hostage. That's how this has been from day one. They wanted the world to see it differently. They wanted it to look like Iran was the irrational actor. They never took the bait because they're not stupid. And the whole game has been trying to flip the board around

Starting point is 02:42:53 to make it look like that's the case the whole time. Lying about mines, lying about the ships, lying about the closure. It's the whole time. In response, Iran responded, excuse me, after they bombed weddings and civilians by striking what it said were U.S. assets. Now, even they say what they said, but again, it's not a Gaza. Guys, these locations can be verified. They bombed U.S. bases.

Starting point is 02:43:17 Now, this is on the second. Today's the seventh. It's been verified. Everyone's, they bombed U.S. bases. So they bombed hospitals, churches, schools, weddings, and Iran bombs BUS bases. Appointment that's been made by everybody because it's valid to recognize what's not saying good, bad. It's simply showing that Ron is not going to do the same response.

Starting point is 02:43:37 at least not right now. They're totally capable of it. I think all governments are. I think they recognize doing so only hurts their efforts. Or maybe you argue they would never do it, except for you to decide. I think it's clear they would if it was in their interest. I think any government will.

Starting point is 02:43:51 The point is they know doing so will make them look bad, will make them Israel and the U.S. will scream, cry foul and say, look, even though they're doing it too. They're just playing this very smart. It says, quote, or rather continuing, they hit Bahrain, Jordan, Kuwait, Iraq, and that's going to become important because what they're saying is we're going to do this every time now and said its aim was to now drive U.S. forces from the vast network of military bases they've occupied for decades.

Starting point is 02:44:16 Occupied. Quote, American evil in the region will be met with heavier, more widespread and devastating responses in any country that cooperates with the aggressive American army must accept its dangerous consequences. Funny, I thought that, I'm curious if they actually changed the word net. There was another quote I'm going to show you in a second where they explicitly name. name the terrorist American government. Because I want to remember, I want to be clear about that, that they're clearly talking about not Americans as people.

Starting point is 02:44:45 Because if that was the case, guys, they right now had the legal ability, the legal ability to bomb inside the U.S. government or in the U.S. inside of the United States. Thank God they haven't. You realize the U.S. government's bombing inside of Iran. There's no reason they wouldn't do the same in reverse. You don't think Israel and the U.S. would. You damn well know they would. But yet they have chosen not to.

Starting point is 02:45:06 Again, I argue it's largely because it's in their interest not to. It clearly makes them on the other side look more belligerent, makes them look more restraint. And that's the truth right now. So, oh, and I finished down this one. Okay, so this one's on the second. So the civil point is there's more information, but they bombed civilians and weddings and anything else you think they bombed. And Iran responded. So this is Trump and his team for whatever reason kicking this back up again.

Starting point is 02:45:30 I think, obviously I think it's because the deal with them on. And they wanted to hide that, my opinion. So the Tennessee holler says the Pentagon is investigating the high likelihood, an explosion in southern Iran that destroyed a home hosting a wedding celebration was caused by the U.S. That missed a nearby target. Oops. Well, let's be clear. Hegseth, they're like aggressively denying it. Fake news, Democrats, lies, whatever.

Starting point is 02:45:59 Narrative. And so the point is they know they did it, just like the girl's school. They know that too, and they've still, they still act. Like Trump's last comment was like, I don't think we'll ever know. What a monster. How does he, I mean, sociopaths don't care, but how do you, you sleep at night? You know, like, it's just, I hope it's terrible. So in this case, now you're getting a Washington report or Washington Post report that's citing

Starting point is 02:46:26 the Pentagon that says, yeah, it's pretty clear, you know, it's most likely them. It was a mistake, though. But, and it says again and again and again, as most people are pointing out, guys, you know, come on, it takes a special kind of naivety to pretend that you continually accidentally hit the same thing over and over. They're targeting civilians. We must know that by now. Our entire life has been riddled with this accident. Here is Saeed Mohammed Randi making fun of Vance making this absurd comment. Here's what he said, and I laughed about it already. Extremely skeptical of this. What I can't say with 100% confidence. He's talking about the wedding.

Starting point is 02:47:00 This is that unlike the IRC, the United States never targets. civilians in combat. We never will do that. We never have done that. And unfortunately, obviously, sometimes things happen. Oh, yeah. Oopsie. Sometimes. In this particular case, I don't think that we have any information one way or the other. Except the Pentagon said you do, though. So you're a liar. You know the vice president would know that long before this was posted. So he's up there going, we don't have any information. Well, the Pentagon says we do. The Washington Post published it. So how do you not have it? Like they love to play ignorance instead of being criminal, guys always you don't target civilians like this is the game guys this does literally anybody believe that

Starting point is 02:47:39 the only people that gaslight for this are people that are on the team people that have an interest in pretending like the u.s is the best and we never do that but there are some out there that believe that they're caught up in the jingoism of it all but that's not the truth it's just not and it's sad that we can ever think that with a i mean you realize how insulting that is for countries around the world Iran, the Sudan, all of Africa, Syria, Iraq. I mean, guys, you could go down the damn list. It's insane how many places have been targeted. Just murder some.

Starting point is 02:48:11 Actually, I mean, this is the real point here. Like, I could go on forever about it. There's tons of examples, but you can easily go and trace this back. This is just an intercept article. But for a century, the American way of war has meant killing civilians. And look, I want to be very clear. I'm arguing literal targeting of civilians. I think that is target.

Starting point is 02:48:33 You can look up quotes of them, not as real. That's happening clearly today. But have people historically in the U.S. government that have made it clear that the game is to make them suffer. Just like you're hearing Ben-Gavir say, not a coincidence. But you have people like Kissinger and others that have made it clear, you know, the sanctions. You need to starve them to death. That's how you get what you want. You've got Rudy Giuliani, speaking of the M.E.K.

Starting point is 02:48:56 saying we got them selling their organs for food. That's how you make a good revolution. They're literally bragging about it. But this goes on to say indiscriminate airstrikes. But fine. That's why I want to be clear. My argument is targeted. But even if you don't believe that,

Starting point is 02:49:11 it's because they don't care to discriminate. Because frankly, they kind of want the suffering. Guys, that's who these people are. I don't mean even personally. Maybe that too. But it's because they think that will gain them something. Indiscriminate. when they have pinpoint targeted ability.

Starting point is 02:49:28 That's who they are. Now, I just simply pointed out. I mean, this is all you need to see, truly, as the quote says, we don't ever do that. And I said, no one believes you. Actually, everyone knows you're lying. There's actually a difference.

Starting point is 02:49:41 Here is when, you know, just the targeting of a girl school. Everybody knows that. And he stands there and lies right to your face because that's the kind of monster these people are, the kind of sociopath, the kind of power-hungry seeker, BBC. Now, this is from two days ago. U.S. and Iran trade retaliatory attacks. So the only reason this is back up and flaring is because the U.S. woke up one day and said,

Starting point is 02:50:06 let's kill children. Let's bomb a wedding. You know? And so then they started bought, then the Iran started bombing a bunch of bases, and then they felt weak and incompetence. So they started bombing things back. That's what you get with children who have lots of weapons. U.S. and Iran trade retaliatory attacks.

Starting point is 02:50:21 The U.S. military, this is the one. what I was really pointing to, said it had permanently disabled two Iranian-linked oil tankers. So it starts with they traded attacks. Okay, wait a minute. They traded attacks. And you start with the second attack, BBC, doesn't that feel a little bit deceptive? Wouldn't you start with here's where we be, here's the first attack and then here's the following attack? No, no.

Starting point is 02:50:44 And they make it like, you know, foggily clear down in the article. But it says the U.S. military said it had permanently disabled to Iran oil. tankers. That was the second action, including one near Cargon, and completely destroyed a third in the Gulf of Oman. Oil tankers. Okay, then it says after that, Iran's state media confirmed the strikes and said Tehran had attacked three U.S. affiliated vessels in response, which is the third attack, as well as three oil tankers traveling through the Strait of Ramos along an authorized route. Now, here's how it began. According to U.S. Central Command, two U.S. warships had been targeted by Iran before the attack on three.

Starting point is 02:51:25 Now, explain to me why you would write it that way. Why on the fifth paragraph you would start with the way it actually began? You know why, ladies and gentlemen? Because if you read those sent with what most people only read, you'll walk away thinking that Iran started it. Literally. You'll walk away thinking that Iran started this. I just think that's so disgusting.

Starting point is 02:51:45 And, you know, I saw Rod does such a great job of breaking down every day the insanely obvious ways that they, you know, dehumanize people with the language that they choose not to or use. You know, that suddenly you're, you know, these terrorist acts are suddenly just, I can't even think of the way they do it. But, you know, they just, they just use words that make it seem benign when it comes to Israel, when it's Palestinians, it's all terroristic language. It's disgusting. But so, cases unclear.

Starting point is 02:52:12 U.S. had warships in a war, which, by the way, in case you're confused, are legal targets. No, war ships, right? It's obvious. They were targeted by Iran. Okay? So this is, by the way, after they started bombing again, and Iran responded. So now we're in the midst of it again, and they're bombing each other. And Iran goes, let's bomb those warships in the war.

Starting point is 02:52:36 And they bomb them. And I guess that's a foul somehow. And Trump goes, whoa, you bombed our warships in a war and targeted oil tankers. So again, in case you're missing the point, you bomb war targets, legal military targets and Trump goes, bomb those oil tankers that are not military targets. Despite the game of trying to protect, like, look, understanding that the way war operates

Starting point is 02:52:59 and not to be naive about it, they bomb everything. We know that. That's my point. They bomb civilians. They do it on purpose. They bomb oil. They bomb infrastructure. We're just seeing a really big insight into that today.

Starting point is 02:53:08 That's not the way it should be based on the law, based on the way we tell ourselves. But, yeah, if you're going to be honest with yourself, that's pretty much how they do it. That's not to say that it should be, though. And that's not to say we should be okay with that, especially since our government loves to feign the fact that they're not that. But you just have to understand.

Starting point is 02:53:24 Like this is such a constant reality of the way that they create the situation. Now, get back to the point. The ships were targeted and they responded and bombed the oil tankers. So which are not legal targets regardless of how they frame it, regardless of what they previously have done. They try, as they highlight, they make it about some kind of a secret black network of oil. I'll get into that in a second. You have to understand that two things are happening.

Starting point is 02:53:47 They're bombing civilian targets full of civilian people. They're not military. They're also bombing oil during a time when oil prices are skyrocketing again because of what's happening. The exact opposite of what he's telling his people he's fighting for. Or maybe he wants that to happen so he can blame it on Iran. I don't even know. But I just think it's important to see. So this is a false breakdown.

Starting point is 02:54:09 And you got military targets like military bases. And then you got Israel and the U.S. bombing hospitals and churches and civilians. It just can't be missed. Sentcom, it says, which oversees U.S. military operations in the Middle East, claimed that the three Iranian oil tankers it hit were, quote, part of a multi-billion dollar shadow network. Okay. So let me break this down outside of their weird language and Trump claiming they're illegal because they exist. Iranian ships are bringing Iranian oil that's not illegal to other people that they work with.

Starting point is 02:54:41 and that because they go raw and evil and their oil sanctioned suddenly becomes they're breaking the law. What law? Your law? I'm pretty sure U.S. executive orders don't apply to the world. And I'm pretty sure international law is not being violated here. But that's how they play the game. They're going to give it to their proxy. You mean what?

Starting point is 02:55:03 Gaza, who's literally suffering on genocide, who's not their proxy? You mean the Houthis who are not their proxy who don't need the? I mean, what are you talking about? BBC's gaslight in the world like everybody else. So just to be clear, as always, they're continuing to bomb civilian targets and Iran continues to bomb their military targets and it's all starting with the U.S. driving this, which I think is Israel pushing it further. According to Eri of the IRGC said that three oil tankers were using unauthorized routes.

Starting point is 02:55:29 Now, on top of that, or that's the third action, was Iran responding as well. Now, what we saw was other oil takers that were bombed after that. Now, this is back, now this, I've yet to decipher whether or not they, I don't think they were sunk. Now, in the first case, Donald Trump's administration tried to sink those ships. And in one case, I think they did pretty much do so. But again, this is all kind of up in the air. This is like, this is the seven. And this one, this was two days, oh, excuse me, this is two days ago.

Starting point is 02:55:56 This is the one of them. In any case, the point is that I wasn't able to figure out whether or not that happened. But what I'm highlighting, though, is that so back to this point down here, is that when they've been doing this in the past, Iran has been simply deterring those ships and we'll find out. And if they sunk them, I would argue that's just a response because of what the U.S. has driven them and do what they're attacking these things. And I would still argue that's not a military target, even if they're doing it in response. That's how you're consistent with the logic and principle.

Starting point is 02:56:24 But what we continue to see is that it's people being forced to go through the wrong route because Trump's pushing that to cause conflict. And then they deter them. And then they don't sink them. And then the Trump administration goes, they're bombing ship. So they use that the continue. It's just all a big show right now. and that means they're continuing to fail.

Starting point is 02:56:42 So unauthorized routes. That's been clear from day one. So when they do that, even if you disagree or even if it's illegal, the point is they've already laid out the pathwork. Trump just bombs these things because he's responding. Now it says Tehran was insisted it will not give up the measure of control over the waterway. And it's previously targeted vessels using the southern route. That's been the point the whole time because Trump's trying to create a schism.

Starting point is 02:57:04 He's trying to pretend like the southern route is what people should do. And he's sending ship to do it. Iran's going, what are you doing? We already told you, we will bomb you if you go that route. It's like, why do you? It's very simple what's happening. Now, you may argue they shouldn't be allowed to do that, but that's a separate story. Why would Trump be forcing them through claiming it's, quote, open when he knows it's not?

Starting point is 02:57:23 You can't, there's no, there's no way to take this in anything other than Trump using those people. Now it says, despite the Iranian attacks, Trump has declared that the straight is open. That's my point. It's not. And he knows that. And the U.S. military has been helping ships navigate the route. They have not. because every time it's happening, they're bombing them.

Starting point is 02:57:40 And the ultimate point is, I mean, they might have gotten one or two that sneaks through by some kind of, you know, the end of the day, the GPS, the monitoring, the ships, the bases, it's obvious that they're lying about that. And then going forward, the market's not changing. They just, remember he said 20 ships on the first couple of days and we could prove that didn't happen. After a period of relative calm, the U.S. resumed attacks last Sunday, when it said it struck two rocket launchers to prevent them for being used to lay naval lines. Right.

Starting point is 02:58:06 but what they did was bomb targets and civilians and or rather hospitals and weddings is the point I was looking for, which is proven. Even the Washington Post, even the Pentagon is breaking that down. But yet Trump wants you to pretend that there was the same minds that they aren't there and that we keep proving aren't there. And again, what does that feel like? The whole thing we described, feels pretty desperate, doesn't it? Feels pretty floundering like they don't know what to do. And Dave DeCamp, this is J.D. Vann saying China acts much more. responsible than the Iranians. They're not the sort of nation that shoots a commercial shipping because they not get in their way. He actually said that. The one that just did that was you guys.

Starting point is 02:58:47 You know, like, this is the late, this is how desperate they are. Like, you don't think we know that, fans? He's hoping you're stupid enough to follow along with what he said. Dave DeCamp makes another point and says, yeah, you don't want to be the ones of the nations attacking commercial ships. Remember Yemen? Remember the Venezuelan ships, both of which they targeted civilian, I mean, It's just crazy. They don't think we remember. Like the whole Venezuela boat thing just vanished. But yeah, they don't just target ships.

Starting point is 02:59:15 I mean, look at, it's like his face. Like, look through the eyeliner for a second and realize that this guy knows that he, we know he's lying. That he knows they target, they sit around the table and talk about killing innocent people. And he goes up, we would never do such a thing.

Starting point is 02:59:30 It just gross. It makes my skin crawl. Now, as of today, the U.S. and Iran, Iran, U.S. war. latest. Tehran sets up potential clash with U.S. Navy through Exclusion Zone. So this is what Eric Dowderty was trying to like see what he skipped, that he responds by saying that now this happens on like a week ago and now exclusion zone and they're terrified. It's like, yeah, you missed a few steps in there, bud, maybe brush up on some school. The reality is clear.

Starting point is 02:59:57 What you heard is a pretty clear series of events and it's been cycling over and over for a while. And it's not about good, bad, but the truth is it's obvious to see that Trump and his side and Israel are the ones in the wrong. They start us illegally. They're pushing it for false reasons. They're lying about what the other side is doing. It's just like a nonstop thing. So now what they're doing is saying, look,

Starting point is 03:00:15 if you keep pushing ships through this false route that we're telling you wheelbomb, that is what, by the way, that you already signed an agreement on that gave us the allowance to do this, even though they reneged on that, but that was the memorandum, the point is that we're going to put you on a blacklist.

Starting point is 03:00:30 If you do, and what they're saying is not Trump, you're already on that blacklist, but anybody else that works with him doing this, If you're a ship, if you're a country that works for that ship and you let Trump can trick you into going through that route, you will never go through the zone again. Now I doubt that's going to be forever, but that's what they're basically saying. Iran has said it will unveil new sanctions for ships trying to pass through the straight following the wrong route. Motion, Razi, the Secretary of Iran Supreme National Security Council told state TV on Sunday that Tehran will announce a new exclusion zone outside of the waterway in coming days. he said any ship seen entering the new restricted zone would be added to the sanctions list,

Starting point is 03:01:08 reiterating that the waterway would only be fully open again once the Americans stop the sabotage, threats, and attacks on Iran. Pretty easy to see that right now. Now, they may not like how that ends up, but that's the truth. And if the point was reopening it, not necessarily having control, which is what they're trying to make you, oh, we just want it open again. Clearly they don't. Because that's what's ready.

Starting point is 03:01:28 It's happening. It's been there. They're stopping it. Now it says Iran and the United States trade fire. again over the weekend, forcing oil prices back up to $93 a barrel and driving her moose traffic down to its lowest since May. Now, this is from Toronto Times. Remember this?

Starting point is 03:01:44 Remember when Trump pretended this guy was an inside asset? How many lies we got spun that blew up in his face? We still pretend like we can't see him lying now. Ghalyboff warns a faster, heavier, Iran response. Simply put the point as guys that they're saying, look, we're going to strike hard. Saying clearly Trump needs to understand, the U.S. and understand the rules of the game have changed.

Starting point is 03:02:05 any aggression against Iran's national interest will be met with a faster, heavier, more painful response. So who knows if that means they're going to start bombing civilian targets? I hope not, just because that's just more innocent people being hurt for a bunch of governments fighting each other.

Starting point is 03:02:20 But I think it means just a crazy over-resales response. What Trump's been yelling to do, but kind of not doing. And they'll keep bombing more U.S. assets and hopefully that doesn't end up being the U.S. country, guys. Like right now, if you're, one thing, you need to be screaming into Trump's direction about stopping this belligerent thing

Starting point is 03:02:39 because it's only going to drive more suffering for Americans and Iranians and Israelis and anybody else in the world that's going to get the brunt of this because of what these governments are doing. Ghalibov also stated that the recent Iranian military strikes against U.S. installations had confused American leaders, accusing Washington of resorting to deceptive tactics. Interesting, including the use of AI to generate fabricated battlefield footage. That's an interesting claim. This is where the world is going, guys. The speaker thanked the Iranian public for enduring to imposed wars, basically saying that the people are with them. Confronting, oh, here it was, confronting the terrorist U.S. government. I think it's important.

Starting point is 03:03:16 And this is what I was saying. So in the Tehran Times, and if you look up the quotes, that's what he actually said. Now, if you read what they post elsewhere, I feel like they deliberately remove the government. They want people to think that they hate Americans. And if you actually listen to them, they regularly out loud that it's the opposite. In fact, if you look at people that travel there, they weirdly love Americans. It's the governments they hate. And frankly, guys, I think that's what the whole world is getting to. But that's why he says the U.S. terrorist, U.S. government, because the U.S. government wants you to think they hate your freedom. No, no, no. They hate the governments who are killing innocent people. I know it's crazy, right? So as Patriot

Starting point is 03:03:55 Blonde points out, Trump said yesterday that the Iran war is insignificant, and he considers it, quote, small potatoes. Got him a lot of names. negative attention. Here it is. Mr. President, the vice president said yesterday that he would not describe the conflict with Iran as a war. But the U.S. resumed strikes for the first time in recent weeks. Can you explain to the American people if this is not a war? What exactly is it? Well, I'll tell you what, a lot of people don't call it a war. I call it a military conflict because it's small potatoes for us. It's not a big thing. We did Venezuela. Not a big thing. We did Venezuela. It's people. It looks like it's coming out.

Starting point is 03:04:35 verified it. The argument being that it was more of a like a quick little deal that was made and you act like that's some kind of a war you won. Like it's pretty pathetic, guys, it's sad. But the idea of what he just said with Iran as a war, can you explain to the American people if this is not a war, what exactly is it? Well, I'll tell you what, a lot of people don't call it a war. A lot of people. Oh, military conflict. Oh, military con. Because it's small potatoes for us. It's not a big thing. We did Venezuela and we did this. Oh, wow. That's a question. That's quite the track record there, Trump.

Starting point is 03:05:06 Funny how you thought you were going to have a big list right there, Venezuela and this. That's pretty sad. In Venezuela, we lost nobody, and this we lost 18 people. And apparently, so if you follow the logic of the sentence, that's small potatoes. And in Vietnam, you lost 100,000 people. Yeah, right. So that makes me the winner.

Starting point is 03:05:27 Trump's the winner, because I only lost 18, right? I'm not joking. That's how he sees this. And other conflicts, you lost tens of thousands of people. And pretty sure we lost a hell of a lot more than 18, by the way. But who cares? Because we, you know, like he lied about how many guys in Iraq when they got bombed by Iran the last time, he's lying about this now. I think it's pretty obvious to see.

Starting point is 03:05:48 Either way, it's not about comparing the amount of Americans that died. Like, what a grotesque way to do that. In fact, but also on a war, you told us for the last three days. So now your deflection is to go, but their wars were worse than mine. are you in kindergarten like i guess yes because what he does seems childish every day guys but the u.s. what a lot of people don't call it a war i call it a military conflict okay a military conflict let's let's talk about that i'm so embarrassed by this person lately just because he's you know two others represents this country well guess what donald trump let's here's how you define war

Starting point is 03:06:28 declared armed hostile conflict or a period of such armed conflict. So by basic words and logic, if you said a military conflict, that's literally a war. So basically he just goes, oh, it's a war footing dynamic. It's not a war, like whatever. There's different words mean, no, words have meaning and those mean the same thing as war. So you're a joke. It's, you know, you're Fauci and EPPP. You're doing the same thing.

Starting point is 03:06:58 And it's lazy, and we see through it the same way. Oh, by the way, you also continue to gain a function in case that matters for the conversation. You lied about that, too. God, it's crazy to me. That's what he said. Now, I'd call it an armed conflict. Well, that's a war. Dummy.

Starting point is 03:07:12 So, all these Americans have died, the ones we can prove. So Trump believes that's small potatoes. Now, they're going to get out there to try to convince you that he just means that the war is small and comparatively. But you guys, you're down. playing what's going on here. You're downplaying that this is not worthy of praise. It's not even a war. Like, it's just, it's a very gross reverse, you know, it's a, what's not

Starting point is 03:07:38 what I'm going to say it. What he was selling you, this is a contradiction of what he was pushing. So it's, it's right in your face of him acting like we're fighting for these people. And then when they die, well, it's not even important because it's not even a war. It doesn't even count. It's all about him. It's all about what Trump does and how he looks and what he can gain from. Now, the Hormuz letter, just a report this is coming out today,

Starting point is 03:07:59 Iran launches anti-ship ballistic missiles from the Chabahar, southern, southeast Iran toward vessels under U.S. Navy escort. So tomorrow, and ongoing forward, we'll be able to find out more about this, saying the U.S. backed southern Omani corridor, meaning basically the one that U.S. wants to be using that's closer to Oman. for the first time the U.S. Navy is escorting vessels in daylight. Now, I'm interested by this. Maybe you have a report right now.

Starting point is 03:08:30 I'd be interested to find out in the chat. Because what I bet you is going to happen is they're going to pull back. The Navy will try to do this. Iran will stop them and they will ultimately just, they've done it this already. And they just pulled back. And so what they do, though, is they lie and go, we suck all these ships through. Well, in the middle of the day, you're trying to push down the corridor that they just said is not going to be allowed. Now, that only means that you know they're going to engage with you.

Starting point is 03:08:56 So all you're doing is trying to show that they're going to attack you. But everyone knows that. And then that's supposed to represent some of that they're the belligerent one. I mean, it's sort of like Iran coming out, which they did before the 28th and saying, look, we know that Israel is going to attack us. Our intelligence is saying they're going to attack us. And if they do, we're going to bomb the countries working with them. That was at the UN before the 28th. Then they bombed them. legally with no justification, and Iran responds and bombs the Middle East country. And what do they do? They go, they're terrorists. They bombed all these countries.

Starting point is 03:09:28 Look, just look. It's like, it's just so, you know, it's, again, the only way you can frame it, if you look at all that, is that they don't have another option. There's no word for that. It's desperate. Right. I mean, you could manufacture a different lie and make it sound. You get the point. It just shows you that they're drowning in this. So who knows what will happen. Very well, maybe that they get one through. It still doesn't change the real dynamic of where this is. Now, D.D. Geopolitics puts, basically points out that Pete Hegset has been trying to, like, censor people and information through personnel. Pentagon, excuse me, Heg Seth's Pentagon polygraphs, 50 staffers.

Starting point is 03:10:11 Polygraphs, 50 people in the military because the truth about empty missile racks got out. The U.S. investigators polygraph roughly 50 member. of the joint staff in August. After news reports revealed that Iran war had drained key American munitions. Guys, I mean, they're so desperately trying to cover this up that they're firing people, they're forced retiring people that simply go, look. I mean, Europe has called it out. They're completely depleted from the U.S. stockpiles there.

Starting point is 03:10:40 It's not hard to see, and they're just desperately trying to continue to hide it. And again, here's Eric Doughty. Awesome. President Trump post himself commanding a warship. Oh, it's so cool. It's like I'm a third grader. even the fake news is having to admit that America is turning the tide. Wow, it's just so I can't even, pathetic just doesn't do it justice.

Starting point is 03:11:01 Weaponized news says, is this really awesome? Yeah, there's no. It's pretty embarrassing. But that's what you get. Trump going, ooh, cool, look at I'm on a ship and things are being blown up. And the truth is that you're being beaten up. So pathetic. So Benjamin Netanyahu comes out yesterday, as Trump is telling you you're winning and says,

Starting point is 03:11:22 tonight, we lowered the price of fuel by half a shekel per liter. I don't know what this says yet. I just popped up the fact check down here. Then he says, while fuel prices are rising around the world here with us, and he means in Israel, they're falling. I thank Smotrich for the joint effort, drive safely. So before I read that, I simply said, as Americans pay more for gas, also the U.S. government can fight a war for Israel.

Starting point is 03:11:48 Netanyahu lowers gas prices in Israel, which, by the way, that's why. I mean, ask yourself how that's a while everything's going up. And I said, ask yourself how exactly do the Israeli, does the Israeli government, damn it, I missed that sentence up. How exactly do the Israeli government has, God, it's terrible. I'm not going to say it again. I swear to you, I look at these before I post them. And I feel like it's so crazy.

Starting point is 03:12:12 How exactly does the Israeli government have the ability to do that right now? American tax dollars. I'm sure there's other factors, but I'm telling you, that's a huge play here. Now, this says, the reader context, it says the reduction of half a shekel per liter in fuel prices stems from a temporary cut in the exercise tax by minister and not from a market decline. I didn't know. I'm not claiming it's a decline. Fuel prices had previously risen.

Starting point is 03:12:38 Oh, yeah, that's not even what I'm getting into. So somebody else is out there claiming something that's wrong and now they're feeling they need to fact check it. Welcome to Twitter. This place is a dumpster fire. The bottom line is that they're lowering gas prices while the cruise. it's going up while you're paying more. Well, the U.S. government's fighting is Israel's war, and Americans are dying.

Starting point is 03:12:58 No Israelis are fighting. They keep telling you it's your thing. You do it. We like how this is working out, but they get to step in and dictate things where it ends, you know, gets to end and they don't want it to. It's not hard to see what's happening, guys. Not to finish. Interesting thing came out of the Guardian on the 3rd of September.

Starting point is 03:13:14 Iran targets U.S. bases, as we reported. Of course, what's funny is they leave off, you know, the fact that they did that response to them bombing, you know, the same old thing, a wedding, you know. As Israel Warren's sanctions could drive Tehran to Iran do desperate steps. Hardly, but do you not see where this goes? I posted this simply and said, hashtag, false flag watch.

Starting point is 03:13:34 The obvious reality is that Tehran has been demonstrating the entire time that they don't act in desperation. Even if they're worried, and there's been examples where I think that they have been on their back foot. And they've been very clearly holding to their plan. They've been planning, they know this has been coming for so long. They've been planning for this as they demonstrated, as Robert told you, well before this got here,

Starting point is 03:13:52 the ships in the mountains underneath canals, everything they'd done. So the idea that they would desperately act out with sanctions, when they've been the maximum pressure. Guys, they have had sanctions on them forever, the maximum pressure. D-Day is the same dumb thing that just started to back up again. Now, I should take it back.

Starting point is 03:14:10 It's actually way more extensive. My point is that I don't think that's going to change for them, no matter what it does, because they've dug in. But what I get from this is that with these next three points, posts you'll see, I think, there's a sentiment being pushed that Iran's about to do something. And I very clearly sense that that's something being driven by the propaganda field, you know, like a false flag potential. Just a potential.

Starting point is 03:14:34 It doesn't always mean it's going to happen, but it's worth considering. Now, the simple point on this is that, you know, the sanctioning that they're going to do, the economic EDA is going to drive Iran to act out crazy and do terrible things. And that's the simple point. You can read the article if you want. This, then, is what Israel is pushing. weirdly simultaneous. It's almost as if it's the same agenda. Iran plotting October 7th-style attack on Israel, alongside terror proxies, Hezbo, Hamas, and Houthis, which aren't that. So this is a lie pretty clearly.

Starting point is 03:15:03 As U.S. war rages are on. You can decide for yourself. My opinion is pretty clear. I think this is obviously not in Iran's interest. It makes zero sense whatsoever for them to do. Like, okay, if they were going to do this, they'd be bombing inside the United States. like the idea that you would literally invade on the ground into Iraq, guys, that would be a huge shift in the way this is framed and would not work in their interest. I mean, I don't think it would. At least they would do their best to roll it momentum against them. So I clearly think this is about framing this either to just use the narrative,

Starting point is 03:15:35 which probably wouldn't have that much momentum, and I think they know that. So I worry it's about doing something and blaming it on Iran. You know, kind of just like we think might have happened on October 7th. at the very least, driving something to reality, letting something happen, whatever it is. So in this case, the idea, they want you to believe that the Hezbollah group,

Starting point is 03:15:52 which is not a proxy of Iran, their allies, yes, Hamas, which is not an proxy of Iran, but they're out, at least they're supported by Iran. Houthis, same thing, are going to somehow collaborate and invent what, go in there to just murder Jews, that's what they want, that it sound like. You know what might be possible, though, if it is actually the end of this,

Starting point is 03:16:09 and they're tired of this ongoing, is that they may amass some kind of an actual attack on Iran or rather Israel to stop this. And I still, I stand by what I just said. It'll still probably, it could potentially bite them. If they somehow use the narrative to work against them. Because my mind is Iran right now is in the winning foot right now. If they just can, you know, it's time alone, I think will drive this in their favor.

Starting point is 03:16:32 And I think they know that. But who knows? Maybe they want to stop this for good. And having all of these countries, Yemen, Gaza, Lebanon, and everybody else jointly fight, I mean, look, they're all being attacked, potentially genocided by these groups. For them to gang up and fight against them is literally what needs to happen for this to stop. But it will be framed as terrorism. Now, all that aside, my point is the narrative is circulating of both Tehran's losing its cool and desperate or the idea that they're plotting this.

Starting point is 03:17:03 I'm worried this is going to be Israel doing something to blame on them. Just my gut. Or really, I shouldn't even say, I mean, it's kind of that, but it's more so just what they've done in history. and it lines up with what this is now. But like I said, about whether Iran might do that, you know, it all lines up. It's certainly possible. We don't know until it actually happens. But the fact that Israel's pushing that out makes me very skeptical.

Starting point is 03:17:25 Then, to end with this, I found very interesting. This is from Iran Observer. It's going around through Iranian media. Here's the actual report. I'll show you next. September 7th, came out today. Iranian intelligence services have dismantled several terrorist cells within the country. suicide best explosives were seized, you know, the Israeli style.

Starting point is 03:17:47 Iranian intelligence services believe the CIA has launched covert operations aimed at sewing instability in the country. Now, they could be lying about that, right? They could be making it up entirely. They could, you know, it could be any number of variations that they're just making up lying about using, always question that. Here's the press TV report. Iran dismantles U.S. Israeli linked Tukfiri terror cell, seizes large weapons halls.

Starting point is 03:18:11 Now, you can read through this. it's very interesting. The bottom line for me is with what they were reporting, what might make sense is that this was the beginning of what they thought would. They were initiating some actual operation. Maybe that meant that they had people inside Iran that would literally go into it, you know, come from there and attack Israel. Maybe it's because they were going to initiate something inside of Iran with the, that was the deflection. Either way, all weirdly timed where you've got these different things happening. You want my gut? I think this actually happened. I think they did, in fact, stop them because they've already admitted they put the they the Kurds they'd armed they'd

Starting point is 03:18:45 armed other mass people they had IDF on the streets they claim or Mossad rather walking alongside the road they've been doing this from the beginning so I just think this is more of the same so the truth is like we should realize what the you know and then oh then guess realize again with the IDF member being caught in ISIS look at these people you know who who looks more I mean anyway the bottom line is you don't need to ask that the history you should know who is tied to this The U.S., Israel. They've literally created, armed, funded, and shuttled these people around ISIS al-Qaeda my entire life.

Starting point is 03:19:18 It's one of the most provable things in the conversation. So now they're stopping some potential tax. So where this goes, who knows? I think right now what we can see is that are desperate. And actions like that, if that's the accurate reality, it shows you that. That they're trying to mix this up. They're trying to cause some kind of jolt to shift narrative, to cause direction to change. So I think it's important to know what's going on.

Starting point is 03:19:39 So we'll leave that for it today. I will try to follow up on that for you and I'll do my best to get back to, you know, some semblance of consistency. I think the important thing is just keep upon what's going on. The narratives, you know, have been pretty consistent. I mean, you, again, you go back and watch our shows from the first couple of months. You wouldn't know the new in and outs of what's happening today, but you'd be like, yeah, same things going on.

Starting point is 03:20:00 The same cycle of nonsense and lies, you know, I think it's important to see that as well as what we started with and understand the arc, right, where it goes, all the back to the map discussion. Just this effort to keep you in the dark for their benefit. Keep fighting, guys. You're making a difference. I love you all. As always, question everything.

Starting point is 03:20:21 Come to your own conclusions. Stay vigilant. Pop culture has touted Elon Musk as some sort of eccentric heavyweight genius with humble beginnings. But this is demonstrably false. Elon Musk was born in South Africa, where he claims he grew up extremely poor. but his family owned an emerald mine. As a teenager, Elon would trade emeralds for cash in New York City, and his father bragged how they had so much money we couldn't even close our safe.

Starting point is 03:20:59 Musk claims to have had about $100,000 of student loan debt, but he received a full scholarship to the University of Pennsylvania, where he bought a 10-bedroom frat house with his friend Adeo Resi and ran an illegal nightclub. The pop culture claim is that Elon has an IQ of $100,000,000,000. But this has never been tested, and after being accepted into Stanford for PhD studies, he dropped out after two days. After dropping out, Elon began his first business venture with his brother Kimball, Zip 2,

Starting point is 03:21:31 which was essentially a digital version of the Yellow Pages. The brothers received tens of thousands of dollars from their parents, and yet Elon denies this. An associate of Elon's father, Great Curry, got involved to bring in investors. But Elon's code was no good, so they had to hire on professional coders to rewrite everything. Zip2 was then sold for $307 million to Compaq, who later shut it down without ever earning a profit. Elon made $22 million, bought a $1Merclton supercar, which made mainstream news, before he totaled the uninsured vehicle. Musk then went on to create an online bank, X.com. He partnered with banking expert Harris Fricker, Edward Ho, and Christopher Payne.

Starting point is 03:22:19 All three ended up leaving the company after accusing Elon of lying to the media about the quality of their product. Elon claims he founded PayPal. Before the company was named PayPal, it was known as Confinity. It was founded in 1998 by Peter Thiel and Max Levchin. After losing millions of dollars, Elon's X.com was bought by Confinity in a merger in 2000. All Musk contributed at Confinity was his own power struggle. He made himself CEO and pushed to change the name to X.com. The executive team successfully petitioned to fire Musk while he was away on vacation.

Starting point is 03:22:58 Part of Musk's resignation agreement stipulated that all references to founders of the company will be removed from their website, allowing Elon to claim credit, which so far is all he has ever achieved. Peter Thiel then rebranded the company as paid. went public and sold to eBay for $1.5 billion. Elon made $180 million from the deal, which he then invested into Tesla, SpaceX, and failed company, Solar City. Elon falsely claims to be the founder of Tesla.

Starting point is 03:23:30 Tesla was founded in 2003 by Mark Tarpening and Martin Iberhard, who developed the Tesla Roadster. When Tesla Motors began looking for venture capital, they approached Elon Musk, who had the first who had the fake credibility as PayPal's co-founder. Musk joined with the condition that he be named chairman of the board. In emails, Musk was upset that the media was not giving him credit for Tesla Motors and went after Martin Iberhard, replacing him as CEO.

Starting point is 03:23:59 He then forced Iberhard out of the company and rewrote the company's history to have himself listed as an original co-founder. Martin Iberhard, the man behind the Tesla Roadster, was promised the first roadster off the estate of the estate roadster off the assembly line. But Musk screwed him over on that as well and sent that car into space. You can tell it's real because it looks so fake, honestly. So who is Elon Musk? Elon describes his father as being an evil abusive man. His father, Errol Musk, has been accused of being a pedophile and fathered a child with his stepdaughter,

Starting point is 03:24:37 who is 42 years younger than him. This spoiled, narcissistic failure, son of accused pedophile, wants to put computer chips in everyone's brain so that we can merge with artificial intelligence. His girlfriend is now bragging how this could all lead to a communist utopia. And strangely enough, former Nazi and head of NASA, Werner von Braun, predicted a man named Elon would conquer Mars in a 1952 novel that he wrote, which is odd, because NASA has partnered with Elon SpaceX to work towards colonizing Mars. Elon Musk, like everything else in today's modern society, is a fraud, a fake genius, just like fake philanthropist Bill Gates and his fake vaccines.

Starting point is 03:25:27 Brought to you by the fake news. Here's a pro tip for dealing with the mainstream media and all of pop culture. Assume it's a lie and research everything. You can tell it's real because it looks so fake. honestly

The Last American Vagabond - Twitter’s Free Speech Illusion Finally Shatters & Trump Refuses To Admit He Lost The War With Iran

There aren't comments yet for this episode. Click on any sentence in the transcript to leave a comment.