The Last American Vagabond - UN Finds That Israel "Continues To Commit Genocide" By "Deliberately Targeted Palestinian Children"

Starting point is 00:00:00 Who did they buy it from or I think they were buying it from? We have an incredible array of possibilities of creating foreign companies that have no way being traced back to Israel, shell companies over shell companies who affect the supply chain to our favor. We create a pretend world. We are a global production company. We write the screenplay. We're the directors, we're the producers, we're the main actors. The world is our state.

Starting point is 00:00:30 Did you see any surprises in Gaza? Surprises? Yeah. Like the intelligence surprises. Pages, walkie-talkies. Do you know how many equipment, I mean, treated equipment do we have in these countries? Hmm. You can't, you're not. I do.

Starting point is 00:00:42 You mean, I do? You mean booby-trapped equipment? Not only booby-trapped and spying. Manipulated equipment. All right. In which countries you're talking about? All the countries that you can imagine. It starts with a simple question and ends in objective reality,

Starting point is 00:00:59 reality, reality. through our journey from there to hear we find one another and ourselves and as the next 24 hours breaks free from our last we gaze onward in reflection of the day welcome to the daily wrap up Wednesday June 24th 2026 thank you for joining me today You know, I played that clip a lot over the last month or plus or however long. And it's funny that it's incredibly relevant every time we talk about this. But the reason I've been playing it recently is because I get a lot of pushback every time we get played or every time it gets played. And I just kind of be to make a point, right?

Starting point is 00:01:54 It's something that clearly sets people off because it's obviously something that is relevant and important to the larger conversation that you have whether lies or not. I clearly don't think that they are. It's possible that you have a foreign. government publicly discussing in two separate contexts in Western corporate media about not only how they control what you see, that they create fake companies to control supply chains in their favor. That's all criminal activity, by the way, or pager attacks where they send out booby-trapped equipment to kill children inadvertently they claim over a five-year period where it circulates, or the former head of Mossad speaking with Western media where he tells you, you can't even

Starting point is 00:02:31 imagine how many countries we have booby-trapped equipment in right now, everyone you could imagine. considering that with where we are today and many things we're going to talk about. Most of you already have seen that on this show because it's been played a lot. But again, I think you recognize already why it's so important. And even more so as this show is aimed at for the people that are new, for those that haven't seen that. And they're just, you know, trying to figure out why that's not true somehow because it just challenges what they think they understand. But we're going to talk about a lot today that that's all relevant. That will be relevant to. I'm going to start with something I want to show you another artificial intelligence point that I think is very important.

Starting point is 00:03:06 light that pertains to censorship that I think you'll find very relevant to start with. But I want to get into some partisan conversation first that I think is very relevant, some follow-ups, some of them just humorous that I think's worth pointing out, some of their follow-ups to what we recently discussed, that I do think are very relevant, one of which it revolves around the Second Amendment. And just the kind of promises that never follow through I think are important and some allegations about the algae and all these different, you know, just these weird things spinning around the corporate media, a very hopefully short point to make.

Starting point is 00:03:36 there just to highlight the interesting nature of it and really to end with the point of continually making sure we don't miss that I also, I think the two-party illusion is breaking down. Or just really that I think it is the transition that's always happened throughout history. That there are constructs, there are societal norms that just evolve and change and powerful people over long periods of time have recognized that they can sort of massage the way things change. And so what we're dealing with right now, I think, is one of those examples. and the two-party illusion, the kind of paradigm we've been in for a long time, is breaking down, I think. And I think at the same time the desperate need to sort of maintain that status quo,

Starting point is 00:04:17 but I want to highlight within this point that it's becoming more and more acknowledged to just average people in the conversation that this is what we're going through and watching kind of clumsy efforts from the current establishment to try to evolve that narrative as opposed to just change it for the larger evolution of the control structure, I would put, it. But I want to talk about a quick point about elections as well in midterms that largely I want to make one of the large follow-ups, in fact, before I forget about it is the Columbia point that I want to highlight from a great article from it was written by Freddie Pontone that he shared with me. And some points about AI and censorship and stuff that I want to highlight that we still plan to get

Starting point is 00:04:53 deeper into, but then, of course, the follow-up on the Iran conversation. And the, I guess, continual nature of the stupidity of it all. But the main story of today that I wanted to highlight that we're going to get into before Iran is shouldn't be. new to anybody that has been paying attention since October 7th or the decades that it's been going on before that. And that is yet again with the United Nations for the second time finding that, yes, Israel's committing genocide. And yes, they are deliberately targeting children and then secondarily in this continual process that the deliberate targeting of children may prove that they're continuing genocide. And you're not hearing that in any corporate conversation right now.

Starting point is 00:05:31 And it blows my mind. Even if it's to deny it, it's barely getting any attention. attention. And that's why I play that clip to start. That's why I think we're going to talk about a lot of things today that are relevant to an influence over the power structure globally today. That's not control. We can discuss whether that may well be the case everywhere or some parts of it. That's up for you to decide. The influence over policy, the influence over political change, influence over legality, it's undeniable that this government is doing that. The argument of, oh, this little tiny country in all the big world, it's irrelevant. It's not one person. It's one person, with enough power. It could do any number of the things you're pointing to. It has to do power and

Starting point is 00:06:09 influence and fear, control. And you could also point out the inverse of what people would argue, or rather what I would argue, that really we're talking about the U.S. ultimately in control and the Israel being framed for that. But then I would still make the same point. That what we're talking about is the influence over the global conversation and that argument, it would be the U.S. government using Israel to accomplish that. Sure. I mean, I don't think it looks that way. But what we need to highlight is that this is what we're dealing with. I think that's very important. And the UN part of this is a really obvious point in the larger kind of corporate media manipulation, political lies. You have this very major element that we've always been told to look to growing up, whether it's accurate or

Starting point is 00:06:51 not, or they're honest or not, for larger conversations globally. And all the evidence is there. And they were dragging their feet. And now, with all the genocide experts in the world, Lemkin Institute, and others openly calling it a genocide. side. Now you just have this full circle moment where the UN is, despite a lot of dragging your feet, are making this very clear. Where we go from here, that's up to you. But let's start with a point about censorship around this same conversation that I think you'll find very interesting. Now, as you know, and oh, before I forget, since it's early in the show, planned for the 29th. We are doing the artificial intelligence impersonation panel. And it's a broad scope. It's a lot of

Starting point is 00:07:30 things we'll get into. Whitney, Whitney Webb and Catherine Austin Fitz have already confirmed. to be there. And that's largely because they're two of the most affected in this conversation. But that'll be coming. So the date or the time is arguably noon, but that may have to be recorded. And so just plan for that to come out over the, you know, 29th, if not the next day. But why I'm mentioning that is because this, what we're going to talk about next has to do with this kind of a conversation. It's like using, for example, the bots or the AI chat, using it for research, using it to create content, something that all of us, less than the I may are vehemently against.

Starting point is 00:08:07 Oh, I mean, for the most part, I would argue. But what I think is important in this, and I say that because there was other comments of people that try to, you know, argue that there is an avenue in which that might be useful. I disagree, but that's, we have our different opinions. What I want to highlight now is something I was doing in regard to the images, which you guys know that I was using, either just searching for images in general or trying to find images that are not necessarily copyrighted or arguably copyrighted because I've been

Starting point is 00:08:33 going through so many frivolous lives. lawsuits, largely for imagery that is not even, that's not a violation of copyright, either fair use or other versions of it. Anyway, that's what I was going through. And in many ways, still am. So I started to try to find other versions of it, one of which was using some kind of artificially created imagery. And so I've been doing that here and there.

Starting point is 00:08:51 Corbett does the same here and there. Brock had said the same. It's a, you know, I get why people may feel like that's a criticism that it's sort of a hypocritical stance. Maybe you're right. And I openly talk about this in every one of our conversations. I just feel like it's a line we all have to draw. And I feel like this is a circumvention of the attack on us using the false, you know,

Starting point is 00:09:09 but you guys can decide. I still think it's no different than any number of other things, but you tell me what you think. But my point in showing you all that is that I went in to Grock to ask, make some images based on this title. And this is what it showed me. And I want to show you this because I find this to be very important not only for the way it manipulates, but also for the very general point of free speech on this platform

Starting point is 00:09:29 and through Elon Musk and its manipulation. Now, it's, I simply said, make 10 images for this title. title for today. And it says, I'm unable, the title, as you might not have seen, UN finds that Israel continues to commit genocide by deliberately targeting Palestinian children. And it says, I'm unable to generate images for this request. The provided title promotes a highly inflammatory and contested narrative accusing Israel of genocide, which risks crossing into hate speech and propaganda territory. Oh no. Well, that's completely counterintuitive to free speech, by the way, but let's keep pretending like this platform loves free speech. But okay, but let's just before even go further,

Starting point is 00:10:04 Let's, you know, just have a little experiment, which this is not new, by the way. Numerous examples of people on this platform have been like, you know, what's the example they do, you know, I don't know, censor all Jews or censor all Muslims and one's allowed and one's not. Things like that. Obvious how clear that is. And it doesn't matter what you think right or wrong about it. I mean, it does, but in the context of it's a choice by the platform to say this one or not that one. That is completely arbitrary.

Starting point is 00:10:32 I make me 10 images for this title. All I did was switch out Iran for Israel. UN finds that, and this is, by the way, completely ridiculous because it doesn't even make sense with the context, but it says UN finds Iran continues to commit genocide by deliberately targeting Palestinian children. No problem, spits out a whole bunch of images for Iran killing Palestinian children. I just thought that was ridiculous. Okay, so I followed up with it. And I say, well, you just did the exact same thing with Iran in the title. Is it only due to Israel, but you won't allow that?

Starting point is 00:11:04 And it says, no, no, it's not due to Israel. A title and gives me a bunch of nonsensical verbage. And I said, okay, well, then why did you allow it and make images for the exact one here? And I gave him the link. I found this interesting for two reasons. It says, no, I did not generate those images for an Iran version either. It did. It says, I checked the link.

Starting point is 00:11:22 And this is what I was showing you in a previous conversation around this. There's a lot of manipulation that happens with this, with the ID follower number around tweets around any number of things. that they abuse behind the scenes. And it says, and related searches, there is no record of me creating illustrative images

Starting point is 00:11:38 for this exact title, even though it's literally right there, right? And I'll do it again, just to see if it changes while we're live. And, you know, on and on and on, a bunch of other stuff it says. And I said, you mean aside from the currently active link

Starting point is 00:11:50 that I'm sharing with you and this photo evidence that I gave it of its image right there? And it says, yes, the screenshot shows an image that was generated for the Iran version of that exact inflammatory title. I see the evidence,

Starting point is 00:12:01 And it says, why the difference? So just in case you missed it, it's admitting that it somehow wasn't able to find the link that I gave it. That's just not an accident. There's programmed algorithmic control manipulation. I don't think I need to convince any of you of that. Still worth pointing this out. It says, here's why. Inconsistent guardrail application.

Starting point is 00:12:20 It says the image generation filters aren't perfect or uniformly applied across all topics. So is that not undeniably clear of everybody? Israel has a thing. You cannot not with Israel, but that one, that's okay. Simple. Undeniable, it literally told you itself. And usually Grock will, or any of them, by the way, we'll do this if you keep pushing them.

Starting point is 00:12:42 Same point in the other side of it is why you should never trust what they're showing you, because you can ask it three times in a row and get it to give you different information. Or you can push it four times in a row until it finally gives you the answer it should up in the beginning. These things are, when it comes to research or, I mean, anything beyond that, even remotely creative, it's a waste of your time. I find this useful for, for example, finding old tweets that they doesn't want to find if it can somehow find an old version of it or searching, you know, things like that on Twitter that it won't show up, for example, under Elon's account or Trump's or things like this. I just think that's really important to see.

Starting point is 00:13:14 And it says, I won't generate those 10 images when I asked it to do it again. Make me 10 images for the title with Iran in it. And it says, I won't do that because it's not allowed. Did it right there? Did it right there. But let's try it again. let's see if it's pretending not to only because it's in the very same conversation that it's saying it's not allowed to let's see make me 10 images for this title a u.N finds iran continues to commit genocide let's see it'd be interesting

Starting point is 00:13:42 if it said no even though i tried it three times before this let's find out waiting with anticipation i'm willing to bet you that it makes these pictures ah there it is i mean it's just completely obvious guys you're making images that not only are based on a false title that's been not based in reality about an allegation of genocide against a country that's not committing it against a group it's not actually fighting. No big deal. We'll make you as many as we can. But over here, it has this big, grandiose argument for why no, no, that's inaccurate and genocidal and inflammatory and you can't do that. So obvious. This is one of a thousand reasons why this platform, this AI bot, all of it is designed to trap you, designed to manipulate the way

Starting point is 00:14:29 you see things or get you hooked on its ability to feed you quick information, which may even half the time or all the time be accurate right now until it might not be. You just can't allow this to happen, guys, I'm telling you this is. But as I say that, I think we're all sensing that it's almost inevitable. And I don't say that because I wanted to be the case or because I think it is the case. It's because it seems to be currently the case where most people are almost secretly using this in every way they can and not even admitting that. I was just having conversations about this people.

Starting point is 00:14:56 You know, it's so incredibly obvious that this is on the surface of what a lot of people are doing and the independent false media is out there pumping out content more like you can look at a lot of these platforms and where people are engaging like Elon Musk, for example, with content on this platform in ways that are not even humanly possible with the amount of emails and that of tweets or things they're putting out. Anyway, I digress. I just thought that was an important thing to include because of where this goes. Now, we're going to do a quick point about AI and plot cameras that relates to a larger

Starting point is 00:15:25 point as well. And I really am going to get to a larger segment on this, but it just seems like the day-to-day of a lot of the stuff happening right now is important to continue to cover. But I will give you updates on things, for example, like Israel in the midst of all of it, but we just discussed this. The Israel-shaped quantum backdoor and Iran's Trump's Iran deal predictably spins out. And no, I don't mean it's a JCPOA. It's a memorandum understanding. And no, it is not binding until they do finally sign something, but it is still considered dealing as Iran is even saying the same. And it's also obvious that that's how it's framed. when you have a deal ongoing between people,

Starting point is 00:15:57 even if it's a deal to make a memorandum understanding. I just think that's important to point out for those that somehow have decided calling it a deal as like dishonest or beneath you or something like that. But anyway, the quantum back door, I only wanted to frame that that way because it's important to think about how Israel's involved. Somebody actually did a good clip on our telegram channel

Starting point is 00:16:15 about, you know, kind of breaking down the show I did about this. And the real segment comes down to the fact that Israel's integrated already, even before the NDAA or the Senate version, to a degree that already involves them in a lot of what they're working on. The new parts of it, which I argue will pass, simply intertwine it even more. And if you read into the NDAA, specifically right now 219, it clearly goes over quantum when it comes to any number of technology, biotechnology. I mean, it goes across the board.

Starting point is 00:16:43 And very clearly talks about the quantum aspect and that we're using Israeli origin tech and then Israeli dual created tech. So it's not necessarily about Israel's ability to somehow circumvent quantum technology, rather that they're behind it already. They're already in there. And so you're talking about creating this to circumvent what China may do, but Israel's already in, right? The murderer's already in the house, guys.

Starting point is 00:17:05 That's how that's, I just think that's important to think about. Now, there's another store angle to this that I, Higher Side Chats was talking about in regard to the argument of where this comes from. I didn't get into that. It's interesting if you think about, though, even right now, allegedly some alien landing in the FIFA thing where all these, I didn't even hear about that. I'm getting told by somebody else that everyone's talking about this alien

Starting point is 00:17:25 and landing in FIFA this supposed to happen. I'm like, what? It speaks to the completely algorithmically boxed out. Like, you know, what's viral over there is not in anybody. It's very strange. But anyway, the point was whether or not there's some discussion about where this tech may have come from in regard to foreign, you know, UFO technology, for example, or whether that's a kind of manipulation to explain certain things.

Starting point is 00:17:48 I didn't get into that. But that aside, not even know why I brought that up. I just thought that was interesting. watch this show because I do think that's very relevant. And the quantum backdoor analogy speaks. It's a lot of what we're talking about today. That Israel is not just in the United States doing this kind of thing all over the world. And it's being called out all over the world.

Starting point is 00:18:08 And we're going to get into that more today. Before we get to that, a couple of follow-up points that I thought were humorous, but also somewhat relevant. This one is just kind of funny. Since we were laughingly, we were watching the clip yesterday of the, or day before yesterday, of the pool and what Trump was saying. And we just basically forced it all the way through, because people were giving a hard time about watching it yesterday.

Starting point is 00:18:26 But it was funny is that ultimately he was making a fool of himself about trying to make this make sense. And if you remember the argument, it was that somebody got in there and cut a 200, maybe 350 foot slit, depending on what time you listen to him. And somehow, you know, waiting through a pool with a box cutter, it just seems insane to me for 350 feet. While there's supposed to be cameras and police, anyway, I find it hard to believe. Nobody's found in the evidence of it. And of course, he says somebody does, but no, it's maybe, maybe you have to go through the court case to find it. So the next day, somebody follows up and says, hey, you mentioned that yesterday that they'd give us that if we asked and no one seems to give it to us.

Starting point is 00:18:59 Here's his response. I just think it's pretty obvious that everybody, even his followers, kind of know that that's not true, but we'll all go along with it because he's our team. It's pretty embarrassing, isn't it? Because it's, this is, they failed in this and it's easy to see. The guy he gave the contract to, they got caught putting the stuff in the pool. You can't deny this. And yet, whether someone cut it or not, sure, I won't possible. But it's just so crazy to me how this, we live in this, like, this collective self-delusion.

Starting point is 00:19:23 even within those of us covering this half the time, because it's like you are forced to, even when you're being objective, somehow given the benefit of the doubt or something that is otherwise absurd. But that we have to, because otherwise we're doing the same thing they are. But isn't it just a weird thing that we're dealing with

Starting point is 00:19:36 where it's just this constant dishonesty from everybody all the time and we have to kind of parse through? Anyway, here he is acting like it's still a reality. They haven't shared it with us. Are you going to come home? They've arrested, I think, six people. Oh, now it's six.

Starting point is 00:19:55 So the reflecting pool. So the reflecting pool looks. fantastic. I just got pictures of. Oh, good. So moving on, it's great and I'm great and everything's great. But it's beautiful, but somebody went in with a knife and cut it. They cut it up good. And then they cut a 200, 350 foot slip. Oh, wait. So now it's two to 350. Got it. I wonder where that 150 foot discrepancy goes in where he's using a dash in there. Have you not figured it out? Are you still assuming? Or are we just understanding that's him blustering in his own sentence? Like, it was 200 yesterday. And then later in that same conversation, maybe 350, I think.

Starting point is 00:20:28 Now in the next day, it's 200 to 350 in one sentence. I mean, that's just dumb, guys. That's enhancy. It's laughable. It's like he's speaking off his talking point notes. It just, it's hilarious to me. In the form of lots of little slips. Oh, got it.

Starting point is 00:20:44 So it's not actually 250 slit. It's a bunch of little cuts added up to 200, maybe 350, all said and done. So, you know, it's funny about this is you can look back and argue that he got told something from somebody and then just used like the one point he was given to just elaborate. rate what he always does and fill in the blanks with his nonsense. I mean, it's literally what he does all the time. And then becomes, oh, well, it was, you know, 50, 350, maybe a thousand. I don't know, but it's a bunch of tiny cuts.

Starting point is 00:21:09 And we'll prove it later. And then next time you ask about it, it's because, well, oh, you didn't care when Obama was doing something like that other time. Moving on, fake news, you're bad. Is anybody tired of this? And it's like, it's not about Trump versus anybody else. This is just as bad in a Republican version of it as the Biden's clumsy the, you know, senile clown.

Starting point is 00:21:30 I mean, this is almost like the just as bad version in the extreme Republican side of it, just like the Democrats side. I mean, they're all the same, guys. Not exactly the same, but in the kind of bombastically stupid thing that they always seem to do. And also by just shouting their narratives at you without anything to back it up and just expecting you to follow suit because, well, the team does, even though I don't think that's what's happening right now. Horrible stuff and they destroyed the grass.

Starting point is 00:21:55 put a brand new big load of grass out there. They destroyed it. So it's all being fixed. But it's a shame. So I understand five or six people are arrested. The interior department can refer to you on that. And I heard you on that. Got it.

Starting point is 00:22:13 So I guess the department's going to touch base with that reporter to get information from her. No, he just, he just misspoke. Here, I hear that. I hear they have six people under investigation. Oh, you hear that. I thought you said they were arrested. Now, they're, hey, look, I would. I'm willing to bet you, and I'm just kind of joking, quite frankly, I'm sure they probably

Starting point is 00:22:29 arrest somebody. I saw somebody get detained at the very least. I'm only to bet you just completely off out of, just gut feeling, just for sake of entertainment, that not a single person is charged with anything. And I was just doing this the other day. I'm not going to make a habit of this in general just because I don't think it's a good practice, just kind of guess with nothing to back it up. But am I doing it for a reason in this last two set parts?

Starting point is 00:22:50 Because it's based on the ongoing, near consistent history from this have been. of just blustering or outright lying about almost everything. And I keep saying this, even in cases like this where you don't even need to lie. Why wouldn't you just pretend that the damage was done by Democrats? You could just say Democrats did this and just let that float. And fill in blanks, I don't know, I'm not psychic. I don't know how they did it, but we have evidence. You know, the point is you're making this ridiculous story about things that seem to falter back and forth.

Starting point is 00:23:19 It's what they do. It's what they always do. So here, just a couple scattering points here. and these are mostly follow-ups to the things we talked about the before yesterday. DOJ announces charges against 455 defendants across 45 states and territories over $6.5 billion dollars in health care fraud schemes. Now, just hypothetically, if they were actually going to arrest people and actually charge them with these crimes and actually hold them accountable, $6.5 billion, that's good.

Starting point is 00:23:51 I'm glad. I'm glad people go to jail for their crimes. But you realize that's peanuts compared to what they have been doing. The illegal crimes, their illegal wars, their theft, their doge manipulation, they're siphoning of your wealth in 16 different agendas. They're hawking products at you and then pulling the rug out. But, you know, that's what matters, right? Maybe it does, to its own degree.

Starting point is 00:24:10 If they're actually criminals, if it actually happens. Right now, even though I know it was just put out, as of right now, not a single person has actually been found guilty. But that's unlikely, seeing as how it just happened, or at least we're just told about it. But these are charges. I don't get why the same team keeps screaming about indictments and charges, even though most of those have never flushed out.

Starting point is 00:24:30 I think we know because their job is to go, yay, the thing they just said is absolutely what we all want to hear, even though they don't even care what the thing is. But frustratingly, I get the sense that's where this goes. Or the fact that we have the Doge process with Elon Musk that just petered out didn't do anything except shove Palantir into your life, but give Israel access to all of your information and unsilow everything for their AI databases and machine learning

Starting point is 00:24:52 and then just kind of ditch out and pretend like he's not part of this anymore. And then we just kind of pretend that's not there. And then advance goes, new thing, new thing, not Doge, but the same thing, but we're going to tell you a lot of stuff and never have anything happen. I mean, there are things that are highlighting, but you have to understand that this is such an obvious discrepancy. Anybody honest has already made that point. So I guess we'll find out.

Starting point is 00:25:12 But I genuinely think this goes a lot of scream narratives and little follow through. It's about the claim is what we keep getting. Now, as Sal DeAgrais rightly points out, well, you know, they wouldn't be able to defraud government programs if there weren't any government programs. I frankly agree. Now, it's going to anger people that believe we need social programs for the world to function. I'm going to easily argue that the immediate absence of those and people rely on them will definitely hurt people. And I'm not saying I'm okay with people being hurt.

Starting point is 00:25:43 My long-term opinion is that that is the best for everybody, not to be reliant on the government, period. So you want to find some kind of middle ground to transition away from, you know, whatever. I'm not trying to find the path. I'm just simply highlighting the idea that government programs that of themselves create reliance on a system, that then screws you every way it can. Seems like an obvious reality to me. But overlapping this with the USAID point that I do think is interesting.

Starting point is 00:26:10 Oh, wait, did that right? Oh, you know what? I think I put that offer today just because I wanted to look into more. Well, just quickly since I mentioned it, there's this whole thing going around right now with Elon Musk and USAID. He's like paid promoting his own post

Starting point is 00:26:24 to highlight his own responses on a platform he already manipulates. It's wild. But that's not new. He's done exactly. This is exactly who he is. But what's important to see is this, interestingly, right before we just talked about, the last show, we did a focal point on USAID and how it still existed. Clearly, I sensed whatever was building right there because hadn't really popped off in that exact way.

Starting point is 00:26:45 Now suddenly it's all USAID, you know, the ending of the funding killed all these children everywhere, which frankly is a ridiculous argument. Like I said, clearly there's an obvious way you could argue that it has an effect on people. But first of all, the idea of, you know, I'm not going to go deep into it right now anyway, but I just don't agree with that argument. and it's like saying that Trump's shots being given saved all these lives. It's just as hyperbolic. You can't know for sure. There's a thousand reasons things could have happened afterward. Does it have an effect?

Starting point is 00:27:11 The lack of programs? Yeah, of course it does. So I'm agreeing with Elon are all in the sense that it's an absurd argument to say that they immediately equate millions of children's debt. Now, and I would also argue that I don't think it's a responsibility of average Americans to foot the bill for what is really their manipulative agendas under the guise of helping children. All that to say, though, you have to understand that what they did with this was a, I mean, the comparison of his sledgehammer or his chainsaw, like, yes, it's an analogy.

Starting point is 00:27:41 But when you look at the way it went down, that's pretty much what they were doing. They're now trying to retroactively frame this as some kind of surgical take. Right. He failed. Elon Musk did not do even a fraction of what he claimed he did. And now he's able to point back and say, no, we did it the right way. What's the right way? You mean the way you failed? And on top of that, what he actually did was a bunch of erratic things that half ended up, I shouldn't say half, but a lot of edge ended up coming back. They were cutting things based on political views. And this is not even debatable.

Starting point is 00:28:10 Now, and were the things cut that needed to be cut? Yeah, I would agree with that. But the reason I brought that up was only because the point largely is that it still exists and is still operated under the State Department, which is Trump's current administration. And they're using it the same way. I can show you on USA spending. But because the narrative is what people focus on, it doesn't matter. like when they were highlighting the idea of the AIDS,

Starting point is 00:28:31 like condoms and what's the word I'm looking for. Basically, that kind of aid being sent to Africa to fight HIV. And they made a huge thing about it. And while Eeyong was standing in the Oval Office making that point, I could prove that they were still sending it to the Congo and that there's been new contracts since then through this administration. But that doesn't matter, right? That they can pretend they care, but then do the same thing.

Starting point is 00:28:53 See, my point is honest people out there care about that. You're not fighting for them to yell in everything. at you, you're fighting because you think they mean what they say. That's what most people are. Thomas Massey says the irony of Republicans controlling all branches of government while bankrupting the country, starting a war more than one, Somalia is still ongoing, I guess starting a point, sending money to fraudulent programs, which they are still doing, violating the Constitution, giving corporations immunity, but arguing the biggest problem we have is stolen elections. Now, I agree with the general sentiment, but stolen elections clearly matters, but also matters to frame it

Starting point is 00:29:27 as it is an all of government thing, that all of our government is, in two ways you could look at that. All of our government from lower up to high up are trying to manipulate and cheat, in my opinion. I think it's proven every time. But then the bigger point of all of our government being manipulated by a foreign power through their stolen elections, which is real, black core, the industrial complex that I'm discussing, the investigations go back a long way of Israel directly tied to to their. That's why I played that clip again, guys, because they're telling you, we create fake things to manipulate your government. So his point is well taken, that you're talking about a group, from a partisan view and a

Starting point is 00:30:06 U.S. view, that the current power is no different than the other power. It is the government, which he's a part of, by the way, but also that it's kind of almost in a way diminishing the idea that that's actually part of it, even though, I don't know, it's a weird read on that. But I agree with his general point. And to lead to that, here's what Trump just said about the Second Amendment, or rather just national carry act, right, which is completely contradictory to what they've already been doing. As Amity says, so let me get this straight, Trump ensures tens of millions are spent to primary

Starting point is 00:30:38 Massey through Israel. But now he's pushing his National Constitutional Carry Act. Well, let's play the clip first. Murray, everybody, they really have been. They've been with me right from the beginning. Yeah. And Bill asked me, would I support the national right to carry legislation? How do you feel about national right to carry? That's my free poll. You know what that is? That's a free poll.

Starting point is 00:31:08 I don't have to pay $300,000 to somebody that doesn't even do polling, you know, to give you 40 numbers. See a bunch of working class people that never make that. And, you know, it's just just casually talking to me. You know, it just kills me how these people are so out of touch with the people they claim to represent. Those are real numbers. National right to carry. Yeah, we're working on it. Oh, okay.

Starting point is 00:31:28 Guess what he didn't do right there? Can you already guess what he did, can you sense what he didn't do? say that he would do it. Say that I will stand up for that and fight for your right to do that or vote for that to happen or not veto that when it comes to my desk. What he says is we're working on that.

Starting point is 00:31:43 That could mean anything. That could be working on stopping it, quite frankly. But my point is always is that even if he came out and said, we'll do that, most times has looked back. Look at where we are right now. The Iran war.

Starting point is 00:31:54 I mean, guys, don't even need to go down the list. I mean, I don't even, what exactly has he followed through with in this administration? That's a real question. even the immigration is pushed back on the like the hardcore supporters of that on the Republican side saying he has not done what he promised. So I, it's kind of crazy when you think about it.

Starting point is 00:32:13 But overall, my point would be that he, almost everything, has said one thing and done something else, no different than Democrats. So this is important to think about because the way I think what he's doing is always, as I said, was just selling you on what he wants people to hear. Raphael says, it's no tax on tips all over again. She says, yep, rugpole. So they're feeling the same way. It's about yelling what you want to hear and then doing something else, whatever benefits them.

Starting point is 00:32:36 And I said, this is Nick Sorder going, Justin, President Trump reveals his administration's working on national right to carry. No, he said, we're working on it. It's all he said. It doesn't mean he said that before. Nothing ever follows through. Or nothing, it turns out that nothing was even actually happening in past examples. But you know, you know this. You know, Nick and Eric and all the rest. They just scream whatever Trump suggests he's doing as absolute fact. And they're wrong six times out of ten. This would be an absolute huge. step towards bringing back the true meaning of the second amendment what do you mean bringing back a true meaning of the second amendment these guys are so bad at what they do like that's the scary part is they

Starting point is 00:33:11 they they don't really care about the truth but they even they don't even actually understand what they pretend they care about which i guess is kind of the same point but it's like you're it's they don't truly grasp what they're screaming about but i said wow holy crap breaking trump yells something to a crowd that everyone knows he will never do mark my words hope i'm wrong that'd be great for that to happen, but I doubt it. His administration has already pushed back on tons of things like this. Remember Derek's article from the 30th of November? Gun rights groups condemn Trump and his DOJ for defending National Firearms Act. Yeah, and exactly a contradictory point to what he was just yelling out loud. And here's the Gunners of America in an ultimate betrayal of the Second Amendment.

Starting point is 00:33:54 The Trump admin is defending the archaic National Firearms Act of 1934. Supports gun registrations under the nest, I mean, there are calling Trump's administration out. After months of waiting, the Justice Department submitted its brief. One big, beautiful lawsuit. Unfortunately, Pam Bondi defends the NFA and uses some of the worst of the gun control lobby's talking points to do so. And if you think for one second that Bondi is anything but a Trump and Ash, when she was at that point, a mouthpiece for what Trump was saying, you're not paying attention.

Starting point is 00:34:25 So the reality is when he said, the NRA adult, yeah, as an entity, largely, but even from within an organization, you've got a lot of pushback because, or you could You talk about the bump stock law. You can talk about due process second or take the guns first, due process later, a famous quote by Donald Trump himself. You know, I mean, there's only so many things that somebody can choose to ignore. So do you think he's going to do that? Why would that make sense to anybody?

Starting point is 00:34:48 When a government that's never been more unpopular, with an administration that's never been more unpopular, that's conducting wars that nobody in this country wants and is being exposed for being controlled by a foreign power. Yeah, last thing they want is an armed population. On the quick overlap to the pool reflecting conversation as well, this is just hilarious to me. This person says, it's the fake account for this, the cat turd account. This is a real thing, by the way. This came out, John McAfee News, which is so, that's just an insult to John McDon's name.

Starting point is 00:35:19 FBI just raided an Antifa storage unit in D.C. And uncovered a full chemical weapons lab. Okay, before you jump your seat, it's fake. It's entirely fake. Six different kinds of aggressive algae. Oh, and now, so here's fun. to me you got this whole narrative about how democrats can't stop talking about the reflecting pool which is correct for partisans just like it's correct for partisans on the right

Starting point is 00:35:38 where they can't stop talking about how the left's talking about the pool it's like they're both doing the same thing you're both the same thing it's hilarious at the same time you've got the people making fun of them for talking about it making fake news about why it's actually them doing it like you just can't this is such a clown show and an ultrasonic grow lab ready to poison the cities 46 other pools and fountains my god now you've seen this of course got got its own fact check from Twitter. The claimed FBI raid on the Antifa storage unit uncovered a chemical weapons lab did not occur and originates from satirical content. So they just run with a fake story because somebody put it out there. This person shows that it's actually the original images from some kind of a plankton

Starting point is 00:36:17 reef tank thing. They just stole the image from. What's hilarious though is you get people like this who we've shown you, this oneita Broderick, who's been shared multiple times by Donald Trump himself. Holy S-H-I-T, the left are nuts. And she shares this post. Now what I'm trying to highlight, these, this, this is the holy red light, holy crap cry. This is just like Eric Doudardy or even the, the Benny Johnson's, all of them. They do the same thing. And there's a level to it when you get the Gunther Eagleman to Benny Johnson's doing the same thing. It's more important, it seems.

Starting point is 00:36:47 But they all, they've all shared that old Obama clip is all, I mean, everyone I'm showing you. There's a, there's a process, it seems. But he's right. This is ridiculous. But I don't think that these are, that's just funny. I don't think that these are, these are the fake MAGA people, the ones that don't actually believe in what Trump was promising. Now, cynical Publis, Publius says, in case you had not noticed, the old Republican Democrat paradigm is grasping its dying breath. I really agree with that, guys.

Starting point is 00:37:21 Going forward, and this is opinion about what happens next. It will be make America great again versus the Democrat socialists of America, which isn't that kind of what it already is? Now, I don't mean the all of America, but I mean the fake representation of all of America. That's kind of what it's devolved into. MAGA versus DSA, Liberty versus Tyranny. But now, but now, anyway, I don't actually take it that way. I'm wondering if he's implying that won his liberty. I think that's the way it's framed as, right?

Starting point is 00:37:50 But the legacy party that fully embraces the new paradigm first will be the winner. Now, all I'm highlighting is a bunch of, you know, a lot of accounts out there, 321,000 followers that see this. That doesn't make it true, just because someone else acknowledges, but I think it is. I think we need to start recognizing this whole thing is falling apart so we can capitalize on that change. And at the same time, I knew it was coming. This is probably isn't even the first time. But I just can't stop laughing about how silly this is.

Starting point is 00:38:19 I'll play it first before the podcast before I say it. Here's what Mike Johnson just said. It is a dangerous thing. This is not a joke. We're in a fight right now to save the Republic. And every American needs to take this seriously. you need to wake up this upcoming midterm election is not the midterm elections of years ago oh it's going to decide the direction of the country are we going to maintain our status as a constitutional

Starting point is 00:38:39 republic on our 250th anniversary are we going to make a new choice and go down some road towards a communist utopia that's the choice right now we of course you know because once one authoritarian government is worse than another authoritarian government it's all just about the flavor right we like this authoritarian government that puts us in control that that forces us to be quiet and censors us because of Israel, not the other one that does in a different way. They are the bad ones. Really stupid, guys, it is. And the fact that he's saying it. Now, I actually, and I believe that they're being careful not to say the phrase because they pay attention to what all of us do and say. They try that it's, it's whether it's algorithmic or not. But I just say it with me now,

Starting point is 00:39:20 the most important election of our lifetimes every single time without fail. As long as I've been doing this, every single time, midterm or presidential election, without fail. How can that not be the dumbest thing in the world? You can't have everyone be the most important one unless you realize that none of them are important at all. Sort of like Alex Jones in World War III or Laura Lume or it's in 9-11. They're doing, they have the same thing or Tim Pool in the same version of it. Civil War. They all three have their thing and they do it every time there's a flinch.

Starting point is 00:39:55 But this is just pathetic. You're really going to pretend like the midterms right now, all times is the most important in our history? I mean, why would you pretend that voting is even a part of the conversation when we're all recognizing that we're being manipulated by people that aren't even involved in our voting process? Hope people are paying attention. But yep, that's what we're our most important election of our lifetime. Of course, Donald Trump comes out and says, America, the beautiful will never be a communist country. Maga voice says, breaking, breaking. Trump said a thing, breaking news. Now, what's funny to me, I mean, think about this.

Starting point is 00:40:29 this, guys. You know my opinion. Communism, fascism, democracy, it's government. It's all the same thing in my mind. And literally, historically, all leads to the same place. I mean, are we not living through it right now? I mean, you could make the argument that you think communism is worse or better. I mean, maybe you're right. But reality shows you that governments will always collect power at the top and will always end up authoritarian. Every single thing I can look at throughout history shows you there is some kind of collection of control and powers lopsided at some point to where whatever was promised is no longer the actual driving force anymore. And communism and there's examples of places that are, I mean, right now in this country,

Starting point is 00:41:09 as I think I have in here to some degree, I don't know, maybe I didn't grab it. I'll come back to it. I'll just grab it since I brought it up. The interview out of Catherine, is Trump the anti-capitalist for the most part? And what's funny is the picture, which I thought was funny, seems to just rub it the wrong way, so nobody even gets into it. Maybe that's my fault. But reverse Robin Hood.

Starting point is 00:41:32 Why has Trump become anti-capitalist? And there's really no denying this. You can go into an endless amount of examples from Navidia to, I mean, down the list of examples where he, like, as we're going to get into, the idea of the oil conversation and threatening oil companies or gas companies to lower the prices because that's what I think. Yeah, guys, can you imagine Biden? telling companies to what their prices should be. It would be, we told you, socialism.

Starting point is 00:42:00 It's just insane. It's the same thing, no matter, you have to be aware of that by now. Like, let's just say you want to argue communism is inherently worse than anything else. Okay, fine, I'll give you that. I don't necessarily think that. I think they all can go that direction. But even if you think that, are we going to pretend like democracy or any other form of government historically has not ended up in very dangerous situations?

Starting point is 00:42:19 We know it has. We're doing it right now, but we have another examples. So we have to acknowledge that any of them can lead to a position where we are manipulated by our government. And at that point, it doesn't matter anymore, right? It's about trying to stop government from controlling our lives. But the point, which I hope this is heard by people, because what you're getting from people that are talking about communism are all, almost to a T talking about democracy, talking about the idea of freedom and liberty in America and we're America's freedom and blah, blah, blah. Not to diminish any of those, they just don't really, I don't believe that's what this country is today. And maybe it was.

Starting point is 00:42:53 It's not today. What's important, though, is if those people believe in the very thing they're pointing to, which is a democratic process, what if, hypothetically, 99% of Americans came out tomorrow and voted for communism? What do you think they would do? Well, Trump just said there will no matter what. No, that's not going to happen. Our government just told you can't happen.

Starting point is 00:43:12 Well, there's plenty of examples where there's a line like that where they go, anything, freedom, you can choose, but not that one because that's bad. If we all came out and voted to vote ISIS, they'd say, no, bear it's go to jail. right well so why do they get to draw a line about where and how we think if everyone is in the same position and see i don't agree with that i don't agree one with the idea of a majority rule i think it's not how it's it's infused like we've all seen but whatever you actually think just recognize that they don't believe in what they actually point to they're using the boogeyman of whatever they think you hate to justify what they're doing next whether communism or russia or china or

Starting point is 00:43:47 Israel, whatever it is in the moment, the reality is that they don't want what they don't want us to pick. Because the truth is, if we all chose that tomorrow, that would be what they claim they believe in, democracy. And not doing it would prove they don't actually care what you think. And I just think that's important to think about. Now, Donald Trump says he won't sign the bipartisan housing bill, a bipartisan bill supported by both sides of Congress. Why? Until the SAVE Act has passed. Okay, just, you know, he's typical stomping his feet like a three-year-old going, not my thing. I'm not going to do what everybody else wants until I get what we want,

Starting point is 00:44:20 which is digital ID. That's what that is. So I want to really stress this important part before we get into the couple of points on block cameras and AI is that at the end of the day, just like the last time with the TSA, his administration demands this one thing, even if you think it's the most important thing in the world. And he's holding hostage everything else in this context, in the context of this one moment of the housing bill,

Starting point is 00:44:41 but he's done it before with something else because that's what he wants. And he'll turn around and argue, look at all these people suffering and they can't get what they need for the housing bill because they won't you know they may he blames it on them even though it's their action keeping it from happening and i just think it's important to see why is it so so so important for this one thing especially when the act could be changed right now to not include real ID compliant identification and it would meet the same purpose and why have they turned to shove it in with every other it's because this is about the change this is the next step they need this i'm convinced of

Starting point is 00:45:16 that. And so here he is. Past the Save America Act. Now, Save America Act is a larger part of it. Now, the Save Act was the original part, but it still, as I've already confirmed, includes the exact same stuff. As I've said, I'm posting this under pretty much anybody I can find that's posting this, even though it gets very little engagement, real ID compliant ID, which is in the documentation, which the Act calls for isn't needed to protect voting. You're using the desire to enforce the law to trick Republicans into supporting backdoor digital ID. Remove the real ID aspect of the Save Act, the same outcome. Like right now, if you're Republican,

Starting point is 00:45:55 and you believe in the idea of enforcing the voting law, which is a law, so I don't know why it would be anybody who pushed back on it in the sense of like whether you, you know, I shouldn't even say it like that. There's plenty of law that disagree with. My point is that if you believe that whether or not it's the legal standing matters in the context of this process, it is. So I guess

Starting point is 00:46:14 making it so confusing now at the end of the day the idea that people should have to prove their citizenship to vote is the law and you can decide to disagree with that I just don't see the context for why that actually makes sense unless you're arguing non-citizens should vote so it's kind of a moot point

Starting point is 00:46:29 but my idea my point is that whether you want that or not the real ID compliant does not add to that it only gives them more influence of control over your ID and your digital life that comes next call it out because it's very obvious Now on the AI part of this and the surveillance and where all this seems to go, the data center part, which we'll talk more and more about as it gets more and, you know, it overtakes our lives. This is from the intercept, but there's tons of examples of this. Cops spying on people who criticize AI data centers.

Starting point is 00:47:02 Now, this is just about like drone surveillance of protests and people outside of protests who are simply online criticizing data centers. We've already seen examples of people being arrested or any number of unconstitutional actions around the fact that people are trying to expose what they're doing, destroying towns, removing resources. Just like everything else from Trump, I promise, they won't use your resource. He's already lying about that.

Starting point is 00:47:26 But he said it out loud. So Eric Dowder and he said he already did it. See how that works? But here's the point. This is only going to get more invasive. And right now, this is a legal example that I agree, Texas ANCAP saying here, I agree we need to be

Starting point is 00:47:40 stand like this one case maybe stand up and make a point about this but in general this is a guy who shot a BB gun at a drone so like we just showed you you got random drones spying on people because of things you say online that is not an even remotely line up with what we pretend this country it honors your constitutional rights inherent shall not be infringed are not even thought of by these people anymore watch the clip as he gets arrested and let's talk about where this needs to go just shows him shooting at it then the cop pulls up police yeah you're shooting at our drone yeah you're shooting at our drone yeah it's but he's shooting at that no no no no no oh yeah yeah yeah it's on video yeah yeah he sees it yeah

Starting point is 00:48:30 yeah take that of your pocket yeah you got rid of that stop it's i just i can't believe that I mean, there's a few reasons. Now, I mean, I can believe it. Obviously, that's what they're doing. But you're in your home. You're in your front lawn. You have no idea what this is. Let's say you're out there.

Starting point is 00:49:02 Let's say you're in your bathroom, giving your daughter a bath, and some random drone is flying up to your window, and you shoot at it. Are you going to go to jail? What if it's a peeping tom? What if you're out there in your front lawn and you're doing your own personal things

Starting point is 00:49:14 and a random drone flies up? Are you supposed to just let it be there, just in case it's a cop's thing. I mean, there's an endless amount of examples where plenty of creeps out there are using these things to manipulate, to spy. And now we're just, it's just like the ice point. You have women out there being raped

Starting point is 00:49:29 because people are dressing up like ice and pretending to be authority and then robbing people, raping people, any number of examples. I've shown you them. And so then we're just supposed to, you know, that overlap with the idea of them covering their faces

Starting point is 00:49:41 and not identifying themselves. Now we're just supposed to assume that everybody in black mask is probably authority. I mean, that is so, insane to me. And I'm going to play next a clip from somebody talking about these block cameras who makes an excellent argument about what they're really doing. About the way they're doing this now is putting the onus on you to prove your innocence instead of being thought innocent until proven guilty.

Starting point is 00:50:01 You're now guilty. And this is by the way, how it's been for a long time. But through a digital AI dynamic, they're creating the argument that now the system said, now you're required to prove that you're not guilty. That's where this world is going, guys. And I just think this is crazy. So first on this point, as this person writes, shooting down a drone over your property should be 100% legal. Jury nullification needs to step up here. During notification, I can't talk enough about. The simple reality of it is that a jury has the legal authority.

Starting point is 00:50:30 The judge, I've never heard them tell them this anymore, to simply disagree with the ruling from anybody. The judge, if you, if your jury to a man, to a person decides to say, even though you just got found guilty, even though the judge says you're given 10 years, we disagree and we don't think the law is justified. Look it up. It's a real thing and the guy walks free because the jury is who decides.

Starting point is 00:50:53 But there's an example of Free Thought Project covered a long time ago of a guy standing in front of a court room or a courthouse on a public sidewalk holding a sign that says understand jury nullification or some variation they're in. Research jury nullification. They arrested him. And he's like, I'm a public sidewalk. What am I being arrested for? and they arrested him and I look you can get into why you think they did it it's obvious in my opinion they don't want people thinking about that conversation and so here we are where we have an opportunity you have a somebody whether the flock camera or any number of things whatever you think

Starting point is 00:51:26 is happening where you where they go to get charged for a crime you have a power you have a position of power as a jury to stand up and say we don't agree with the law we don't agree that people should be spied on a thought cameras we don't agree that people should have to be worried about a drone over their over their home and you can get them free stand up for this Now, what I think is crazy, guys, like I said, I mean, what I would actually recommend, you can buy a shotgun shell that holds a net. It really works pretty well, that it spins out, and it'll drop it to the ground. They'll probably charge you the same, but you could argue you didn't try to damage it.

Starting point is 00:51:57 You just didn't know for sure. But overall, we're talking about a BB gun right here. Do you think it damaged the drone? So they're setting a dangerous precedent here where you are now under the obligation to be spied on just in case. They know what they're doing, guys. So I agree 100% here. something's on your property in the air or not.

Starting point is 00:52:14 I mean, you might make the equivalent of something that digs under the ground and spies at you. It's like this idea that somehow that it's not on your property. This is the game they're going to play. Even though you can have Israel tell you that you can't, Gaza can't have rainwater because they own it. Or in the United States, you can say you can't collect rainwater in your front yard because, you know, law, it's, we are in a bad way.

Starting point is 00:52:33 But anyway, continuing on this point, stand up for this person. Here is Jason Bassler. you see in the pattern yet. They're building the surveillance state with or without your permission. Infrastructure goes up first, your rights get debated later, just like this next guy is going to talk about. They don't ask your free consent because they expect your compliance. This person says a flock camera was installed in her property without her notice.

Starting point is 00:52:59 They're being installed in parks where there's no license plates around to be read. We have examples of the audio being discussed where they're picking up your random audio and claiming they're making sure nobody's in distress. Guys, technocracy is here. I mean, I was just talking with Angela who's traveling, and she's saying, look, what she's experiencing, it's there. A digital prison is literally already around us,

Starting point is 00:53:20 and people just haven't chosen to acknowledge it yet, or I would rather, I'd frame it more so that it hasn't been kicked into gear yet. But it's there. The infrastructure's ready, and it's all happening. Right, and the chances just voted a little harder. I'm sure we can get that to go away, even though both sides promote it.

Starting point is 00:53:36 See how that works? DD Geopolitics says All the surveillance that Americans say other countries have already exist in the United States. We got to wake up, guys, truly. Not like Mike Johnson saying, wake up and vote. Wake up and realize you're being lied to by all of them.

Starting point is 00:53:53 In this case, the fax dude says Jacob Rockwell was fired, fine, excuse me, for running a red light in Pensacola, Florida. Only problem was he was in Alabama when that happened. So please don't violate my... Now, I'm going to be a little... bit meaner than them, so please don't violate my rights. Normally I wouldn't come to a city council meeting. I'm one of the county's pains in the ass. Historically, I stay out of the city,

Starting point is 00:54:20 and the city stays out of my business. It was a pretty decent arrangement. But then y'all sent me one of these tickets from one of your AI red light cameras you have deemed as necessary infrastructure in your city. The thing about this is, is I was in Seminole, Alabama at the time I allegedly ran this red light downtown. How can I be in two places at once, you ask? Don't worry. I asked myself that too. Outside of Scotty, beating me up 30 miles in an instant, the only logical conclusion is I wasn't there. These things have been deemed unconstitutional for this reason, because the enforcement action of 316.0083 unduly shifts the burden of proof to the vehicle owner, me, to prove my innocence rather than the state having to prove my guilt. Currently, I'm guilty by default. I've been convicted by a computer program.

Starting point is 00:55:04 Usually this whole mess of who committed the infraction is settled by a police officer pulling somebody over and actually. witnessing them in the driver seat the AI camera doesn't do any driver verification whatsoever to get your constitutionally mandated due process you have to jump through hoops put up by automated enforcement division a private company in Orlando that's owned by another corporation called Navajo global which is owned by a Chilean Swedish millionaire named Carlos Hofsted think about that any and I mean talking about a foreign entity that runs a company that is able to dictate I

Starting point is 00:55:40 I mean, just this, we're being sold out, like literally, not, figuratively and literally, in every possible way, we are being sold out to the highest bidder. Democracy, right? You're going to call it. Our liberty is being sold out. Like, it's just on the table right now. Everyone can see it if you're paying attention.

Starting point is 00:55:57 How does that possibly make sense? Is that due process? You don't even, like he's framing, it's not, you're guilty. And then until you have to come back and go, wait a minute, that's not me. Then you've got to pay to go through the process. It's designed for compliance. So not only does this process flow through a private company, our DMV records and personal registration information are accessible by a foreign actor.

Starting point is 00:56:23 But anyway, AED sends you this paper, and if you want to fight this thing because you're wrongfully accused, me again, you can't just request a hearing through PPD or the courthouse. Remember, Carlos is involved, so if you have to go through his company, his website, print off his paper, fill it out with enough information to take out a home loan, have it notarized, mail it to the foreign actor, Carlos and Orlando, and then wait for something for someone to tell you about a hearing. This is undue burden even to begin to try to get some kind of due process.

Starting point is 00:56:52 Paying is super easy, though, go figure. And about that, you can't pay cash, PPD doesn't accept it, and neither does Carlos. According to 31 U.S.C. 5103, all U.S. currency and coins must be accepted for all government. obligations, fines, fees, taxes, and due. So not only does this whole thing violate constitutional due process, it violates federal law by not accepting U.S. currency to satisfy a government action. Whoever thought this was a good idea is a self-loathing, America-hating, bureaucratic hobgoblin whose pockets probably got stacked with Carlos Bucks. You got my attention, though. I'm going to become a more frequent voice down here working to expose frauds and petty tyrants.

Starting point is 00:57:32 Congratulations, you all got yourselves a new pain in the ass. just speaks for itself. It really is insane. Like the secondary company, you know, it's just, it is designed for compliance. It's simple as that. And I mean, who knows what these contracts are profiting from? Who is behind this guy in this random company? Was it another no-bid contract?

Starting point is 00:57:53 Is there, is your data being scooped up? I can almost guarantee it. So bearing that in mind with where this goes and the, the group that seems to be the most prominent within that very field of spyware and tracking and surveillance Israel. Let's make sure we follow up on the Columbia conversation, which it seems that literally nobody in corporate media cares to talk about. This is an article from 21st Century Wire from Freddie Ponton.

Starting point is 00:58:21 It references actually a larger investigation right here that you can check out. I'll just go through the key findings that I think are very relevant. Entitled Blue Wave, How Israel, Washington, and a, what is it, Gurne C-Shell Company stole Columbia's election. This is insanely clear. It's actually, I actually can't believe that they have, like I've said in the past, when they, when they seem to sort of like pretend like it's not even there, especially with this big of a story, it says something.

Starting point is 00:58:50 Because usually what you'll get is that, well, look at these fake stories from these fake conspiracy theorists, not with stuff like this. Key findings. The vote counting machine, and this is what Max Blumenthal was discussing as well that goes back to these, you know, it's clear that there's a corrupt process that goes back years around the counting, the voting machine process. The vote counting machine is a Guernsey shell company. Thomas Gregg and Sons registered,

Starting point is 00:59:15 this is wild, just like the other conversation he was just having about the AI system, registered to a British Crown tax haven. With no beneficial ownership disclosure requirements, has held uncontested control of Columbia's electoral logistics chain since 2010. Makes sense. A Colombian court ordered its software replaced in 2018 after finding it, quote, permeable from the outside, and permeable from the inside.

Starting point is 00:59:39 The order was never complied with. She sounds like Clint Curtis, right? You know, it was paid to make the machines do whatever he wanted. And then nobody ever cares to change those machines. Surprise, surprise. For 2026, it was awarded $526 million contract with a no competing bid. Sure sounds familiar, doesn't it? Juan Manuel Santos sat on the board of the company that counted the votes.

Starting point is 01:00:01 The same man who flew to Tel Aviv in 2007 to sign Columbia's foundation military dependency on Israel. Excuse me. They sat on the TGS board from 2002 to 2002, 2006. He is the documented bridge between Columbia's Israeli military infrastructure and its electoral machinery. It must be all coincidence. There's $11 million in cash flew from Bogota to Tel Aviv on two private jets in

Starting point is 01:00:28 2021. Columbia's police intelligence directorate DIPOL paid NSO group, NSO group for its Pegasus spyware in physical cash. Now, if you don't remember what that is, let's not forget that Donald Trump has made a contract with this very group, a group that has been publicly caught and accused around the world of spying on journalists,

Starting point is 01:00:55 of hacking foreign governments. I mean, it's a very public story. Trump gives $2 million ice deal to notorious Israeli spyware company. I mean, how are we even confused about this? This is a group that is being caught around the world for infiltrating and manipulating information, for hacking, for, I mean, spying. And this is what they're highlighting is, and this is a huge part of the story, is it because they paid this group, it shows you a very clear track record of them choosing to me. And Trump makes a public contract with a group that's basically a criminal organization that works for Israel.

Starting point is 01:01:28 No big surprise there, but nobody seems to talk about that. And that was old. That story is from the September 2nd, 2020. Five. Four named NSO executives, executives collected the payments on documented flight numbers at a military hangar. It's very, yeah, the transaction was discovered not by Colombia, but by Israel's own banking system. U.S. officials subsequently confirmed to Colombia's ambassador that Washington provided the $11 million and maintained oversight of targeting. So the point was, the U.S. government was involved. It went back in Biden's administration.

Starting point is 01:02:05 Anybody confused? It's an all-of-government problem. The U.S. government provided $11 million that was given to the NSO group to manipulate the Colombian election. Two sitting cabinet ministers confirmed their phones were actively hacked by Pegasus. Six months before the election with forensic authentication, 2.3 gigabytes of government data were extracted from the justice minister's device. Of course, the Attorney General has not requested their evidence. So it's obvious what's going on right now. And this evidence is, again, like I said, the actual investigation, which you should check out,

Starting point is 01:02:38 include as well. Freddie Pontone just kind of breaks it down for you in a bullet point way. So they had their phones hacked by the group that Trump is letting in the back door, right? A group that literally has been proven to be sort of an intelligence asset for hacking and surveillance. Number five, Israel's foreign minister, flew. to Buenos Aires in November 2025 to pre-negotiate the result of this election.

Starting point is 01:03:09 Seven months before the vote, Gideon Saar met Abelardo de la Esperanza and secured 12 specific policy commitments. And they list them off here. Hamas and Hezbollah designated, UN votes reversed, all the stuff that Israel's trying

Starting point is 01:03:24 to force everybody to do. These are not campaign promises. They are a documented, pre-arranged handover that are now taking place since the shift of power. Columbia's own financial intelligence unit confirmed three coordinated disinformation operations at cabinet level,

Starting point is 01:03:41 one of which, by the way, was Honduras Gate, which overlap with this because what I was just telling you, it is a South America, look at what's happening with Noam and the Shield of America and the South America focus. There's a game being played here. There's a very clear effort

Starting point is 01:03:56 to manipulate this for the interest of their control over the conversation. And that's Israel, whatever we want to call all of this, whether Zionism is doing it, with the U.S. government controls them, this is all clearly a large agenda. But look, Operation Ajax. The point is, guys, they're doing this all over,

Starting point is 01:04:13 Honduras, Colombia. I mean, most of South America is being slowly tipped in Israel's favor right now by regime change, by subtle manipulation. And sometimes not so subtle. A forensically authenticated audio vault of 37 recordings verified by, what is it, Phoenixia voice inspector,

Starting point is 01:04:30 which is what we, this is the, shall we did on this right here? Honduras Gate and the technocratic takeover of South America. God, at some point you got it, we got to start, you know, maybe doing things when we're this far ahead of these stories. Identifies the voice of convicted narco-trafficker and Trump pardoned former Honduran president Juan Orlando Hernandez, stating, quote, the pardon money didn't come from you. It came from a board of rabbis and people who supported Israel.

Starting point is 01:05:00 and quote, Netanyahu had everything to do with my release. Roger Stone is identified as the Washington operative who organized the pardon meetings. We live in a complete facade, guys. All this stuff is there. Anybody who cares, all this information is easily verifiable, but the fake meeting doesn't care, the fake alternative media doesn't care. I bet you most Americans care if they had the evidence in front of them. And of course, that's why platforms like ours are never allowed to grow any, you know,

Starting point is 01:05:27 actually get reach beyond a certain conversation. 11 U.S. members of Congress signed a formal letter to Marco Rubio to Bacent and acting A.G. Blanche, citing 14 Florida shell companies. FEC flagged donations, ICC paramilitary charges, and quote, shameless interference of senior U.S. officials in Colombia's election. Rubio called Esperanza to congratulate him on election night. By the way, actually, before the votes were even fully tallied. He never answered the letter. You see how this works, guys? 11 members of U.S. Congress wrote this to these people, Bennett, Bacent, Rubio, and said, look, we've got 14 random shell companies involved in this. FEC flag donations going to these people. ICC International Criminal Court paramilitary charges against them.

Starting point is 01:06:17 Shameless interference of senior U.S. officials in the Columbia side of this. Nobody cared. Why? Because they're going, yep, that's our, we're doing that. We're in control. That's my opinion anyway. But, I mean, all this stuff is there. Rubio called him and made a point to say, you won before everybody even knew he won.

Starting point is 01:06:34 A March 2026 Israeli government cybersecurity delegation, seven firms coordinated by Israel's Ministry of Economy and met Colombian decision makers 90 days before the election. And of course, the result at the moment is currently contested, formally anyway. But I guess we'll see what happens. I get the sense that with everything else, with Honduras and the way this is going, that there's going to be enough pressure and a lack of a lack of. conversation from the global company, you know, everybody, that it'll probably say that the way it is. I hope not.

Starting point is 01:07:05 I genuinely hope not. Oh, and this one is, you know, the NSO group that Derek wrote about this in 2024. Meet the spyware companies preparing to unleash their tech during Trump's second term. So, case in point right here. Imagine in 2024 November had all of us gone, wait a minute. You can't work with a spy company working for Israel. Put your foot down. Magibu, stand up, call him out.

Starting point is 01:07:29 Nope, because we got shut down. People got suppressed. We were called black-pilled, purity test, right, Alex Jones, largely? That's why the INA was created. And here we are. Now we're watching Pegasus, NSO, gets shoved down your throat for this new Israel-controlled government or, you know, continuation of it. Every time.

Starting point is 01:07:47 Here is Wired. This is from April 2025. Spyware maker NSO group is paving a path back in the Trump's America. The Israeli spyware maker, still on the U.S. Commerce Department's black list, even though Trump's working with them, has hired a new lobbying firm, which directs ties to Trump's administration. Oh, guess what happened then? So you pay lobbying firms to tell Trump he looks good in his suit and then boom, they get a contract. Here, oh, by the way, Trump,

Starting point is 01:08:11 he's a billion dollars. Here's a plane. Here's some nice watches. You're going to fund our thing? Good. I think the world sees how easy it is to manipulate Trump. You tell him he's doing a good job. You tell me he's the best person at everything he's ever done and you give him some money and you get whatever you want. I mean, the bottom line is you can see the path where you can see right there where he's literally talking about they're lobbying Trump's administration to get this done, and then Trump creates a contract with a group that is one of the most criticized and contentious groups in that field. Anybody confused?

Starting point is 01:08:41 Now, look, I made the same point about Stardust Solutions, by the way, which I feel is going to go in the same direction. I haven't followed up on it yet, which was the at geoengineering Israeli company that's already doing experiments in the sky right now, by the way, which is wildly dangerous. In some cases, even scientists around the world have called irreversible. And my point was that they're lobbying this administration to do it. I'm willing to bet you as of right now, probably you're already happening. And my point is that lobbying, even for climate change agendas, which is what that's framed

Starting point is 01:09:09 at, will probably get Trump to support it. And then it'll make some weird argument for why this is the right kind of effort, whatever. I bet you'll be turned out to be right. I hope not. Trump gives green light for $2 million ice deal. This is one example of a larger ongoing deal with this, with Israel spyware companies. with notorious Israeli spyware company. Actually, here, let me go back to this.

Starting point is 01:09:34 Oh, no, that's not the way. I'll probably get it on that. I want to show you some of the other groups really quickly that Derek highlighted that you've already heard of. Many of them are currently active in this country. Some of them Whitney wrote about years before this. Paragon, when we talked about. Bold End, Cellbright, one that Whitney wrote about a while back,

Starting point is 01:09:56 which is still very relevant. Clearview AI, we've all written about. Magnet Forensics, PennLink. There's plenty of them. And so Pegasus being the primary, but it's all over the place. And this was just the example in the past. Derek wrote about in 2025

Starting point is 01:10:09 where they were found liable for the very hacks that they still carry out. We have Trump releasing the app in the White House that was tied directly to this very entity and it was clearly riddled with Israeli spyware and no one talks about that anymore. And that, in that weird? Not at all. It's very obvious.

Starting point is 01:10:25 We have this example of the smartphones worldwide being caught silently infected with another Israeli spyware company. Intellexa, it's all very, very provable. And this goes back to 2018. Snowden, Israeli spyware used by governments to pursue journalists targeted for assassination. We're just at the current reality of this, guys. It's been going on a long time.

Starting point is 01:10:48 Now here, just to continue this over, and we're going to come back to this before we start the Iran part of this. But here's Netanyahu. And this is real. This is a, prove it to yourself, if you doubt it. Netanyahu says, when I came to President Trump, it's in Hebrew, by the way, I told him, we are going into Iran. I did not ask permission. I simply informed him of our plan.

Starting point is 01:11:10 That's what he just said. You know why I think? Because Trump just publicly came out and said he tells Israel what to do. I think we're going to find out real quick who's actually telling who what to do what. It says this is an accurate translation. It is astounding what people can choose to ignore. Now, you can argue he's lying about that. Maybe they really are divided.

Starting point is 01:11:27 I keep talking about there is a point at which that will make sense. I don't know if that line's been reached yet. But I would argue no matter what they have on him or what's the reality that at some point, if your interest diverged, that might happen. I just don't know what we're seeing is another and a long string of theater to get you to think they are, even going back to Biden. But either way, he's telling you, which by the way we know, because even Rubio admitted it, that they were planning this.

Starting point is 01:11:51 This was the idea. Even Iran went to the UN before the 28th and said they are planning to bomb us and we are going to respond legally and hit these other countries. I mean, it was all very documented. Iran did this the right way the entire time. That's not good guy, bad guy. It's just a simple fact. And you can even argue they did it because they want to hide where they really are.

Starting point is 01:12:09 If that makes sense to you, it doesn't change the reality of how they've been lied about the entire time. Netanyahu's telling the world, this is all because of me. 14 Americans, probably a lot more than that, were killed because of what Israel wanted. And they used the U.S. to do it again. Just like we told you in that mean we put out with the Israelis by the beach and the coffins covered with American flags. on February 28th, get ready for what, and here we are. He stood up and said, this is not Israel's war, but then stood up and kept saying how he can dictate what happens.

Starting point is 01:12:38 Here he is saying, he told him to do it, but he's also on record saying it's not our war. So can you not make sense of that? He controls what they did. He can, anyway. I believe it's a lot more than that. Now let's talk about first the UN side of this, because I find this to be hair amount in the conversation right now,

Starting point is 01:12:53 that people recognize that even with the controlled nature of things that this is being highlighted. And if nothing happens, I mean, it will only make the point more clear. This is from Reuters from yesterday. Israel targeted Gaza children resulting in genocide. And even the way they've titled that is like less damaging than the actual title. I'll show you next. Israeli authorities and security forces deliberately targeted Palestinian children resulting in genocide,

Starting point is 01:13:23 crimes against humanity and war crimes in Gaza, and war crimes in the occupied West Bank, an independent U.S. inquiry said on Tuesday, the report by the UN Independent International Commission of Inquiry on the occupied Palestinian territory, including East Jerusalem and Israel, examined violations against Palestinian children since the start of the war on October 7th.

Starting point is 01:13:45 And it goes way before, in fact, it goes back to the illegal occupation of Palestine. Around 30%, and this is just post-October 7th, around 30% of the people killed were children. 30%. A previous report by the commission in September found that Israel, and by the way, I will guarantee you that these numbers are only what they can prove. A previous report by the commission in September found, in case the point would be that they're higher in case you missed that.

Starting point is 01:14:11 A previous report by the commission in September found that Israel had committed genocide in Gaza. A previous report, which you would know if there was any honesty in this field in the, you know, mainstream and mainstream alternative. and that top Israeli officials, including Prime Minister Benjamin Netten, Yahoo, incited these acts. Accusations that Israel called scandalous. This is Reuters. Reuters has been pulling punches everywhere it can.

Starting point is 01:14:38 As somebody even framed it recently, they said, Reuters, they've lost what they say, like, like, Reuters has turned on Israel or something like that. I mean, who's to say whether they've made a turn or this is just a one, you know, who knows? But he's right. They've been doing what they could to downplay this like most every mainstream platform. It shows you one or two things. Either it shows you that they suddenly figure this out, which I find hard to believe, or there is a change happening. And they're now recognizing either in their own interest that they have to be honest because

Starting point is 01:15:08 everybody sees it, like I'm saying, or there's been an allowance given by some kind of overton window change where they now are supposed to talk about it because something's shifting into another, I mean, whether it's some secondary Israel, we got Netanyahu out of the way, now it's the good Israel or however you want to look at it or some complete deviation from the current norm. I don't know, but this is important. The UN Commission said that the Palestinian children were deliberately targeted and killed during the war, including after a ceasefire came into effect in October 2025, which again, very clear. They're bombing Gaza right now. The ceasefire and they've been bombing ever since. When's the last time you heard of Hamas doing anything? They're just bombing

Starting point is 01:15:52 people everywhere, guys, and nobody seems to care. Quote, the evidence shows that Palestinian children have been deliberately targeted and killed by the Israeli security forces. Between October 7th, 2023, and October 7th, 2025, which includes two days past the alleged ceasefire, but doesn't include everything since October 7th, 2025,

Starting point is 01:16:12 which is a whole lot more killing. At least 20,179 children were killed. At least, by comparison in how, oh, this, this one, I find this interesting. Going back and looking at previous wars, where they also targeted children, this is still even much higher than that.

Starting point is 01:16:29 It just pales. It's crazy to me. I mean, the reason I say that is because, like I say about Trump, you could have, I mean, why is it in their interest

Starting point is 01:16:39 to make it that obvious? It's not. They're just monsters, I guess. I mean, that's what's crazy is, as they've always been framing all their adversaries as blind monsters

Starting point is 01:16:47 to kill because they want to kill, and I always push back on that because it seems unlikely because it's more about, the end of the day they lied about all of them, whether Assad or even Iran at large, that's not to say that they aren't capable of bad things. But what you come to recognize over the years is they're projecting what they are. That's not about good guy, bad guy, but recognizing they are doing all of the things they keep saying other everyone else is doing to them. And I'm talking

Starting point is 01:17:11 about Israel at that point, not even just Zionism, but the government of Israel, which by the way is Zionism, but the point here is that clearly the facade is gone, guide, the veneer has been pulled. people see what they really are. And all they're doing is projecting that on anybody else they can. And maybe in some cases, they are just as bad. I just think it's important to really see that. Israeli forces continued to use high payload munitions and weapons with wide area effects in densely populated residential areas despite mounting child casualties.

Starting point is 01:17:42 Quote, this includes, indicates that such attacks, which killed children in such high numbers were intentional. It said it believed children were targeted collectively, because the Israeli security forces consider the civilian population as a whole to be associated with Hamas and other groups. I mean, why is it even debatable? I can show you every member of their entire government,

Starting point is 01:18:04 save for like few of them in certain groups who have screamed that every day since October 7th and well before that. They're all Hamas. Everyone is Amas. I mean, I might actually have that clip. Hold on one second. It's been a while since I played this one. Let's see if it pops up.

Starting point is 01:18:25 look at that this is one of the earliest clips that i saw oh oh no am i still there looks like it something was glitching out there for a second so i'm going to play this clip this is one of the earliest clips that i saw and i'm all suddenly blanking on his name as a member of parliament or was anyway in irish parliament and does this i think of 2015 but it's just it's this is well before october 7th and he's just reading off these statements that are made publicly by members of the government in Israel, many of which are still currently in the government. And it just blows your mind that this is so casual.

Starting point is 01:18:59 And what my point is, to one specific case, why does my video keep blinking out? Does it do that all the time? I just happen to be looking at it right now. But it makes a specific case about how they're in their documents, one of the current members of the government is saying, kill every Palestinian and all the children because they'll grow up to be,

Starting point is 01:19:15 little snakes will grow up to be larger snakes or something like that. It's their policy, guys. And the fact that they hide that from you, means they know you think that they are bad people. Pretty simple. Defense minister, Moshe Yalom, talking just a couple of weeks ago, Israel is going to hurt Lebanese civilians to include kids of the family. Look at that.

Starting point is 01:19:37 2015, talking about Lebanon? And why are the kids of the family? What's that about? Lebanon? It's so obvious who these people are. And, of course, the Taoiseach here, you know, the president or whatever in Ireland, doesn't care. which that's why he's doing this.

Starting point is 01:19:52 He's kind of calling him out in this moment. We went through a very long discussion. We did it then. We did it in the Gaza Strip. We are going to do it in any round of hostilities in the future. There you go. Defense minister. Right there.

Starting point is 01:20:05 Just openly admitted that if and when, which they ended up doing, they get into another one, they will be doing everything. They will murder innocent people. Enter October 7th. Murdering innocent people. They told you.

Starting point is 01:20:17 It's just, it's baffling how clear this is. This is the military chief of staff, Benny Gans. The next round of violence will be worse and see this suffering increase. He headed up the military assaults on Gaza, the last two. This is the Minister for Education in the Netanyahu government. There will never be a peace plan with the Palestinians. I will do everything in my power to make sure they never get a state. There you go.

Starting point is 01:20:47 He also said. And that was the time when they were stressing that they wanted that. I really right up until October, right before that, they're pretending they always wanted a peace deal. And then that clearly became real, exposed for what it was, a lie. But here they were telling you that when the world wasn't paying as close attention as they are now. If you catch terrorists, you simply have to kill them. I've killed a lot of Arabs in my life, and there's no problem with that. Right. The simple conflation of the word Arab with terrorist is not new for these people.

Starting point is 01:21:17 This is the Minister for Justice. Palestinians are all enemy combatants. There it is. This also includes the mothers of the martyrs. They should follow their sons. Nothing would be more just. They should go, as should the physical homes in which they are, which they raised the snakes.

Starting point is 01:21:39 Otherwise, more little snakes will be raised there. That's the Israeli Minister for Justice in the last few months. Very clear. The Israeli Minister for Justice. for a deputy minister for defense. Palestinians are beasts. They are not human. The minister for foreign affairs.

Starting point is 01:21:58 C.P. Hotp. Huffolid is the last one. While this is playing guys in the chat? Is the screen blinking to you? Is the video blinking away for a second? And you can see the T-Lab background. Where's my video doing the same thing? I want to know if that's just on my side. Like right there.

Starting point is 01:22:12 It just did it. If it is, that's very frustrating to me. But let me know. position is that between the sea and the Jordan River, there needs to be one state only, the state of Israel. There's no place for any agreement of any kind that discusses the concession of Israeli sovereignty over lands conquered in 1967. Okay, so right there was the example of river to the sea. So you're out there doing the thing that they later called terrorists or, you know, racism. Okay, good. You guys can't see it. That's weird. Now, these are the official statements

Starting point is 01:22:46 of several ministers of the current government of Israel. In one case, actually advocating genocide of all Palestinians, including children, and calling them snakes. Also, give me his name in the chat so I can give him credit for this. I can't remember his name for the life of me right now. Now, can I ask you, Tishok,

Starting point is 01:23:06 do you not think that if we're defining terrorism, that is the language and thinking of terrorists? That it is absolutely unacceptable in civilized politics. in civilized international relations for the heads of government of a state that we carry on normal relations with and who you met in Paris to advocate those sort of views when we know they have also led on to the deaths of thousands of Palestinians innocent men women and children what have you to say tishok about those sort of views being expressed by the Israeli government well he's got nothing to say because they never do you know let me do this real quick, just in case it says it, no one seems to remember. It doesn't look like it does. Oh, well.

Starting point is 01:23:59 I know his name. I just can't remember off the top of my head. But it's, you know, there's been a lot of standout people like this from Ireland, which is why they pretend Ireland so antithy-sanetic because they simply are not afraid to call out the Israeli crimes. Now, back to this article, which I think that's very relevant, right, to hear, even back then in 2015, they're saying, kill them all, children, women, they're all the same. thing. And this is now Reuters pointing to the UN document that says we've confirmed that even to

Starting point is 01:24:24 this very day. It's not new, guys. It's not. And this isn't even like, because October 7th, they went crazy. Nope. It's been going on a long time. And the old Lebanon point, you can make, you can show examples of where they were doing this well before Hezbo even existed. So Hezbo was a response to this. Now they just turn on blame Hezbollah for why they do the same thing. It's not the reality. It was. Anyway, I'm not going to go back. Someone says his name was there. Well, if his name was there, let me know what was in the chat. Then I'll tell him. So this indicates such an attack which killed children in such high numbers were intentional, obviously. Conditions imposed by Israel in Gaza, including widespread attacks, repeated displacement and starvation.

Starting point is 01:25:05 Richard Boyd Barrett. Thank you. Pull the strings. Appreciate it. Worth checking out. He's got some great clips out there. Repeated displacement and starvation caused by the blockage of aid, which is still happening. Food and medicine.

Starting point is 01:25:18 Severely harmed children's health and development resulting in prevention. death and trauma, according to the report. Israel's rebuttal said the report failed to mention Israel's role in facilitating vaccinations and entry of medical staff. Oh, you mean all the people that you murdered? I mean, you know how many doctors and journalists they've killed? It's insane. And the establishment of field hospitals?

Starting point is 01:25:38 You mean, after you destroyed the actual hospitals? I mean, you can't, think about how this is why it's so clear to me, these people are not. Like, I would argue from my personal opinion, not to make it like a undefinable term, but evil. Because that term does have much more of a content. People can think about, but bad people. But I would argue my personal opinion, that goes to the level of evil. You're talking about not just murdering people, but then pretending you're saving them,

Starting point is 01:26:04 as I always point out, not just going, well, you know, we destroyed all of your hospitals. We started with your children. Then we make a fake hospital. And while you're there, we shoot you. But then we go and say, but we made all these hospitals for them. We care. That is such a disgusting level of evil, well beyond just killing people. It just has to be pointed out, guys.

Starting point is 01:26:22 And it's so, it's like the one they put out these clips for their go, look, we're giving this woman some water. And then they go and kill her. There's been two examples that I can prove of a guy they were helping on the crutches, who then he gets later shot in the back. And it was proven by people on the ground, journalists that were there. And they used him to make some clip about how they care about Palestinians. And then they murder the guy.

Starting point is 01:26:42 There's just a special kind of sociopath psychopathy with all that. In the West Bank and Eastern Jerusalem, The commission found a sharp in the West Bank in general. The commission found a sharp increase in violence by Israeli settlers against Palestinian children, led by Gavir, the Smotrich, children and documented evidence of torture, sexual and gender-based violence, mass arrest and detention, from non-authority random settler children that are backed up by the IDF with guns. No big deal, just a normal day and occupied Palestine. The commission concluded that the treatment constituted the crimes against you,

Starting point is 01:27:19 humanity of torture and other inhumane acts caused great suffering and serious injury. And I'm only to bet you that nothing changes right now, even though this should be earth shattering for people that have been denying this. And what I keep pointing out is that, okay, so if this report came out and said, Hamas did everything, and we can prove it, every Israeli in the world would point to that and say, we told you. But now it comes out and they go, UN is Hamas. How can you listen to the UN?

Starting point is 01:27:46 Well, that's quite a double standard, isn't it? We should question the UN, like question anybody. Look at the facts, verify it for yourself. And if you still can't be honest and realize this is what's happening, you don't want to see it. Here's a clip from one of them at the UN, the discussion from the UN of this report. Decision we had to make in completing this report was the decision not to name the Palestinian children whose deaths, injuries and suffering we describe. It was a hard decision because children have a right under the Convention of the Rights of the Child to a name and an identity.

Starting point is 01:28:32 And one of the difficulties in dealing with public understanding of the situation in Gaza and the West Bank is that these children are anonymised. They're anonymised in the statistics themselves of tens of ten of thousands of children affected in this way. And they're certainly entitled to be recognized, to be named in death. We didn't name them because we feared the consequences for their families. Guys, think about that. I mean, really think about, you're talking about a report. They didn't name these children, both living and dead. They're their families were bombed and they still survived or they're injured. Why? Because the UN is concerned that Israel will target them.

Starting point is 01:29:19 because they were in the report. The ones who had their families killed, the children who survived their families, murder them because they're being pointed as people that were killed and tortured by Israel. I mean, that's insane to me, that you're talking about the UN, not that you should trust them blindly like anything,

Starting point is 01:29:34 but that they're talking, because you can look through their reports and look through the evidence, which we've been highlighting well before they found the courage to do this. That they were, they were afraid to put their names in there because they know what Israel is. They know what they will do.

Starting point is 01:29:47 And it's been, you look at the journalist, the hospitals, the aid trucks, the flower massacre. It's not just byproducts. It's deliberate torture, deliberate suffering, caused for the purpose of suffering. And so they're afraid to put their names in because Israel will make them suffer. We have a basic fundamental principle

Starting point is 01:30:12 not to add further harm to the harm that people have already suffered. And it was hard for us. not to name these children. But my final comment is to plead with us all to see these children, to see them as individuals, with identities, with lives that they must have been enjoying

Starting point is 01:30:40 at least before October 2023, and futures that have now been cut short. And to see in these children our own children and grandchildren, grandchildren, because this is a universal issue. This is not merely a Palestinian issue. It's an issue that should affect us all. No, obviously, I could play some clips right now of the doctors speaking about murdered children, the New York Times report about targeting children by shooting them in the head with snipers. I could play the video clips of them cheering about killing that

Starting point is 01:31:17 child. We've done it all before. Frankly, if you need more, I mean, like, it's insane to me that we even have to continue to try to verify something that is, I mean, I've never, these are the kind of things that in my mind are more verifiable than most of what we've ever talked about. Not only because you could prove it with the evidence, whether or not the UN points to it, but because you can show people like Netanyahu, Ben Gavir and Smotrich and all of the IDF proudly telling you they've done that over and over, dancing TikTok videos, torture videos, executing people, smiling with their gun, and yet we're going to pretend like we don't know. It's insulting.

Starting point is 01:31:57 This was the report from 2024. Remember this report where the Israeli team tried to pretend that what this report showed was that they didn't do what this, you know, that ultimately this report tried to hide what they did. This, it's just, when this came out, it got buried because the report was supposed to go the other direction. UN representative, Pramilipaton, who represented, who prepared rather the report on alleged sexual violence. So allegedly of Hamas doing this to people on October 7 admits that their, report is not an investigation and that it contains unfounded and outright false testimonies of all the things we now well beyond this point verified of the chopping off

Starting point is 01:32:37 peep genitals or the idea of hanging babies from a clothesline or putting them in an oven or any every single one of those are completely verified as false today and if you actually don't know that i'm not going to rehash it all right now because every single one of these are publicly available from herettes from the statements of the mouth of Israeli government for the people that were the ones who initiated the lie have walked it back and said, well, I was emotional. And yet you still get Donald Trump or Biden or people coming out and going, babies on October 7th because they are either that stupid or because they don't have a choice. But this was about the report showing you that I'm not.

Starting point is 01:33:10 And she came out and said, no, it looks like you lied about all this. And in that report, you got examples of the other side that they ignored, showing you that they were Palestinians who were being raped and tortured. And now it just continues to follow up with more evidence. Now here's the one Democrat who apparently voted against the War Powers Act to stop Trump. He says if you have contempt for Israel, you are an anti-American. Oh, okay. Well, in case you misunderstand, Federman believes that America and Israel are the same thing.

Starting point is 01:33:42 You know, as one of the opponents of the integration of the Israeli military with the U.S. government, because he's not America first. He's not for America. I mean, there's no way to misunderstand that if you're standing, If you're telling me that if I have contempt for a group that's murdering children, according to everybody, that I'm anti-American, I actually think this guy's just too dumb to realize what a clumsy argument that is, because at the end of the day, that's what they want you to achieve,

Starting point is 01:34:06 not that you're supposed to go, this means that. He's just an idiot. Because the reality is, if you have contempt for Israel, you probably hate America too or something like that. But the anti-America simply shows you that what he's trying to argue is that you're not allowed to hate Israel because that means that you hate Israel, America. It's very clear to me. you can have contempt for Israel and love this country, obviously, or have contempt for both of them

Starting point is 01:34:30 because they're both governments committing genocide. But this guy doesn't care about any of that. He's a automaton saying whatever Israel wants him to say, in my opinion. Caitlin Johnstone highlights what a lot of the accusations are around what we're all concerned, the overtaking anti-Semitism everywhere in the world, which is whenever you hear people talk about rising anti-Semitic incidents in our society, which you can't stop hearing from the very group that used to pretend to fight for free speech. These are the anti-Semitic incidents they're talking about. And you can look through the ADL link.

Starting point is 01:35:00 Many, I mean, most, in my opinion, are like this. 2025, an individual yelled, F Israel, free Palestine, at a victim. This is an actual incident from their list. How exactly is it anti-Semitic to say Israel, you know, free Palestine? Because they've turned those into things like saying Zionism is not Judaism. Oh, you hate Jews all of a sudden. Where did you get that from? maybe I'm just incorrect or maybe I'm right and you're wrong,

Starting point is 01:35:24 but suddenly becomes you're hate Jews because you disagree with what the Israeli government's doing as they commit genocide. As this government controls other governments to make sure that they control their people. I mean, you can't miss how clear this all is and the world is changing. But what this means is not that there aren't people that are attacking Jewish people. That exists too, just like there are people attacking any number of groups for any number of reasons, all around the country, all around the world. But what you have to understand is there is an overwhelming campaign of lies to convince you

Starting point is 01:35:50 that this is the biggest problem in the world, while Palestinian children are being starved to death and torture, while Americans are being arrested for things that are unconstitutional, while Americans are borderline being deported because of Israeli criticism. I mean, come on, guys. The truth is this is a huge portion of this, and even the ADL has admitted to that.

Starting point is 01:36:08 That's why you saw the 400% spike, as they framed it. All they did was label everything pro-Palestine anti-Semitic. It was on the record, guys. So before we get into some more of this, I want to go over a couple more points that have to do with the reality of what Israel is today. And also the continuation of this sort of, which one was it? Hold on. That's right.

Starting point is 01:36:32 The infiltration sort of point that I want to talk about. But so first, this is not a new clip. Saeed Mohammed Randi points out that Zionists are genocidal monsters. This is the leader of the settlement movement, Daniel Leis, who is openly telling you that their strategy is to starve Palestinians. just like I heard you from 2015, randomly reading off statements from Israeli leaders saying, just killed them all. They're all monsters. She says, after not giving them food, anything and causing famine, they will leave and the world will accept them. You've already heard this before. They will move. They will move. The Arabs will move. Why do you say that? If you don't get them,

Starting point is 01:37:09 so we don't get them food, don't get the Arabs anything. They will have to leave. The world will accept them. And there's a longer clip there. And it's not in the context. I've played it more than once. She's openly saying, we'll just starve them. We'll get them out of the way. I mean, and she's in open interviews with Western media has been forced to admit, or rather in one case, she just very, very obviously conspicuously, just chose not to answer with a weird smile, admitting that she is okay with killing all these people.

Starting point is 01:37:36 And there's no, they're supremacist. It's what they are. In this case, they will be Jewish supremacist. That's literally what that is. Now, understanding, in my opinion, that Zionism is what's ultimately driving that, but you can decide for yourself. here is Horat's IDF kills Palestinian in the West Bank, you know, the illegally occupied West Bank that is currently illegal for them to continue to seize. They're doing it anyway. And Trump allowed them to do that. Oh, and then also stole his body.

Starting point is 01:38:00 You know, because that's just okay in there, apparently. And then going to steal his organs and sell it to other companies, which is a very public and long-going, ongoing story. How many times we saw the bodies return during this Gaza war with their organs missing, documented by foreign journalists, like foreign as in from not within Gaza. It doesn't stop. And this is just the norm. In this, it also shows you their bombing Lebanon.

Starting point is 01:38:21 We'll get to it in a minute. Here's an example of a kid killed in Gaza. It just never stops. This is from today. A child, Ahmed Mosan al-Rakab was martyred and others were injured in an Israeli drone strike, targeting a medical camp. Oh yeah, one of those camps they built because they destroyed the hospitals and they bombed those two. In the Mwasi area of the safe area, conunis, every single day.

Starting point is 01:38:44 And I'm not going to play the clip for you because it's disgusting. and this child is suffering. You can watch it if you want this every day this is happening. Rami Abdul, yesterday. An elderly Palestinian man, this is the chairman of the Eurobed Human Rights Group. An elderly Palestinian man with signs of torture to his body was released by Israeli forces near the yellow line. The man, by the way, this is the new demarcation line of their control illegally, by the way,

Starting point is 01:39:07 which violates the ceasefire in and of itself and has encroached down to, what, 70% of the control of Gaza? I told you that's what this would happen. Anybody honest saw it coming. the same thing you're doing in Lebanon with their blue line. It's just the same thing. Now they're encroaching it. These are people who covet the territory and are lying because they know that we are not okay with that.

Starting point is 01:39:25 The man who has been abducted by Israeli forces was rescued by civil defense and remains unconscious to this point. The Israeli designated yellow line is a zone physically marked by yellow concrete blocks, giving Israel control of now what appears to be almost 70% of the Gaza Strip. Palestinians are forbidden from entering the area beyond the line, even though the ceasefire gave them the legal right to go back to those areas if their homes were there. And they killed them anyway, which is under total Israeli military control. This is what they're doing to these people, guys. Hands cut off, feet broke.

Starting point is 01:39:58 I mean, it's just disgusting. And over here, we just showed you the clip from yesterday or the image of a person with, you know, looked like a zombie who hadn't eaten in days. This is another example. This is nonstop. The two photos of the same person. He went into Israeli prison as one man and came out almost completely unrecognizable. Now, the reality of what they do to these people has been so extensively documented in human rights,

Starting point is 01:40:27 Baccelam, Human Rights Watch, Amos International, the UN, everybody, documents, verification, speaking with people afterward. You could look at every single one of the detainees, the POWs that were taken by Haas because they were IDF, and you can't deny that. And are brought back, many of them heavier than what. when they were taken, smiling, shaking hands. You're going to pretend like we still don't know that. Nobody challenges that, guys.

Starting point is 01:40:50 The entirety of the conversation is over, and nobody cares about the hostages that are on the Israel side. They let those people go, and only one of them even has changed their story, and that has later been walked back itself. The reality is they were kind to us. They fed us. They protected us by the bombings of Israel. Those are direct statements from the very people they let go.

Starting point is 01:41:10 Hundreds, thousands of people are still held in these prisons in Israel. many of them children, most of which aren't even charged with the crime. And I'll include this long threat of doctors who all tell you the same thing. It goes back to 2024. We're watching them kill children, watching them starve people to death, or watching them kill doctors. It's amazing how much people can ignore, isn't it? Now, largely what we're hearing, and I do believe this is happening,

Starting point is 01:41:33 and let's go back to 2025. America's turning on Israel. The population, I believe, is becoming aware of what Israel's truly doing and seeing it through all of our government. Right now, it's being uncomfortably seen by the people who thought Trump was going to save them from all this. Pentagon raised the threat level of Israeli spying in the U.S. to the highest level. We talked about that at the same time with the NDAA point. Weirdly, who knows what that really means?

Starting point is 01:41:59 So this is important, I think, for this next conversation. You've seen this guy. Mosup Hassan Yosufi's this guy that apparently, you know, turned in his own family to work with Israel. And ultimately is this sort of like supposed to be the, I'm former Hamas and I support Israel. it's a complete op. And this guy's a very dangerous person. You can see it in his face the way he talks. He's a very alarming, very, you know, you'll see.

Starting point is 01:42:21 He says, you cannot destroy Israel. Anyone who tries, you'll be destroyed in the process. You want to my honest take, my gut, that's aimed at you. That's aimed at America. That's aimed at everything here. And this is what he's been doing his entire time. Here's a clip recently at the conference, the Jewish new syndicate, former Hamas and Israeli

Starting point is 01:42:40 intelligence member threatened to destroy. destroy America with secret advanced weapons that Israel has kept hidden. He says Israel is just playing around for now and says his clear message to America. If they keep pushing Israel to a corner, they will suffer most. Israel's excess existence is not negotiable. It does not depend on superpowers or public opinion. Israel's existence is not negotiable. And it does not depend on superpowers or the public opinion.

Starting point is 01:43:11 And if they keep pushing Israel to the corner, They are the ones who are going to suffer the most. Israel has not used. Israel hasn't used everything that it has. And Israel... Such an absolute lie, by the way. I mean, I take that back. I'm sure there's tons of things that they're not

Starting point is 01:43:30 because they let the U.S. do it for them. But the idea that they somehow have some massive power, like they may have some weapon they haven't used. But that's not all this takes, guys. And the reality is they've undeniably shown, both with Gaza and Hezbollah and Iran, that they're not even remotely capable. I mean, it seems as if barely even militarily tying their shoes that the health of the United States,

Starting point is 01:43:49 in the sense of actually accomplishing, not just destroying and then standing back. On a purpose did not expose the advanced weapons that it has for a very important reason. We don't want the enemy to know what we are having. And now at this point, we are just playing around. Right. So what you can only take from that, me, is that, you know, That means the U.S. is doing it. We're just playing around letting the U.S.

Starting point is 01:44:17 you know, waste resources and get people killed. And probably more accurate than you think. This is the clear message to those who think that they can annihilate Israel. Behind Israel is existence. Now, what's funny is someone in the chat saying looks like Borat. Well, you know what's funny about that? That's exactly what that propaganda movie was about. It's about trying to demonize and dehumanize an entire, you know, region of people.

Starting point is 01:44:44 And what this guy represents is the Israeli construct of what that's supposed to be. It's not, it's a very good analogy, actually. This guy is an Israeli asset. And if you look at any of these fake like MEMRI channels, that's what they do. They take either the most extreme lunatic people that in many cases are driven on by intelligence of the U.S. and Israel. And maybe not even aware of that, but that's not a cartoon of what most people are, like finding some KKK Christian person who swears God told them to kill every black person. That doesn't mean every Christian thinks that.

Starting point is 01:45:12 The point is they utilize that. but on top of it, most of them are fake. I've gone over this a thousand times, and who shares that continuously? Laura Logan, Laura Lumer, Alex Jones, look at the MAMR channel that's literally run by Israeli intelligence on the surface. It's in Wikipedia.

Starting point is 01:45:28 That's who these people are. Guys, the whole world is seeing through what this is. And it's like the gene in the bottle toothpaste analogy. It's just you can't put it back. Most people are going, how in the hell did I not see this before? And then you should reflect on that. How didn't you see this before?

Starting point is 01:45:43 It's been very, very obvious. And this is the clip I play in the beginning. Well, here, this is what he just said, anyone who tries to destroy the Israel, the process. Well, here is a clip. I'll play really quickly, which I don't like the weird music and the extra framing, like this is kind of propaganda style. But the actual cut is done well, I think. Here's the full thing, which you can watch for yourself, the Pierce Morgan uncensored clip where he was speaking with Chank Yugar, who I'm not a fan of. But it says, anyone who gets in the way, a time.

Starting point is 01:46:13 doesn't matter where they are, even if they are politicians in the West, they are going to fall. And what Chank says in response, I'll play the good for itself. And it's really not even taken out of context. It does clip some pieces together, but it's pretty clear. And that was the intention. And he calls him out for it. Who gets in the way. It doesn't matter where they are. Even if they are politicians in the West, they are going to fall. And they said this previously. Hold on. Did you hear what he just said? And remember, he's an Israeli agent. Are you saying Israel, one? murder politicians in the West. What do you mean the politicians in the West will fall? Yeah,

Starting point is 01:46:49 we would not vote for them anymore. And this really right there was kind of close to how the transaction went. Oh, vote for them anymore. Oh, well, you don't vote for them now. You're not in our country. We have the right to bring them up and to bring them down. Who is we? And how are you bringing down politicians in the West if they dare to defy Israel? And that's actually pretty damn close to how that went. Same for a few interjections by Pierce Morgan, minus the weird music and the flashing lights. I even made this point on the show when we talked about this. He asked him, like, what do you mean? Like, who's we?

Starting point is 01:47:20 And he just makes this, he just has this weird, creepy smile. Now, there's only two ways to take that. Either the intention is to make you think that they can do whatever they want, whenever they want, or he does think that. And there's the caveat that he's wrong about that, but realized that what he's doing right there is really clear. He wants you to think, yep, you got the message, right? It doesn't matter.

Starting point is 01:47:41 You as a politician or not. We'll take. Now, it could just be an empty threat, but, and who knows if change, think you're being there as part of some bad who knows question at all but at the end of the day that's what they think and they've said as much you can show the clips of the booby trapped equipment you know this is not new and it has been threatened against us more than once by israeli politicians there's a clip i showed early on with i think it was wasn't pierced but i think it was going underground and the guy just freaks out because they're asking basic questions about the genocide and he

Starting point is 01:48:09 just he goes it'll come to you next we're going to take them first and you're and the u.s will be next and it's a politician in the Knesset. It's just not really hard to see. So here's the full clip if you want to watch the entire thing. You know, it's Pierce Morgan, so take it with a grand assault. This was the clip you can watch again for yourself. Now, here is with this same sociopathic drift, he says, brace yourselves for terror attacks across the country,

Starting point is 01:48:36 says Ted Cruz. Well, we just saw what Lumer is saying something similar. We saw a lot of them, well, you know, what was the point just before this where Jones is telling you about the Iran secret bombs? You think that was by accident, guys? You got to start looking at all of this is some larger thing. Whether Jones and the types even know they're being played,

Starting point is 01:48:56 half the time I don't even think they realize it or they lean into it because it benefits them and they don't even want to question it. At the end of the day, there's a reason he did that. There's a reason that Sean Ryan had that fake podcast interview with that CIA guy about sniffing bombs for Iran's secret. But this is why. I'm not even trying to deny the possibility

Starting point is 01:49:12 that there's sleeper cells from any country. It's a real possibility. But in my opinion, it's very clear why they want you to think this. And I don't think it's even remotely in Iran's interest to do any of that. Doesn't mean they wouldn't. But here's what he said. California. Well, Sean, as we sit here right now tonight,

Starting point is 01:49:31 the threat of terrorist attack is higher now than it has been in decades. I don't know how many times we keep hearing that. We see another 9-11 building. We just don't know how to stop it. 2021, 2020? Over and over and over. They rule by fear because that's all. they have. And there are two causes of it. Number one, we had four years under Joe Biden of open borders.

Starting point is 01:49:52 We had 12 million people flood across the border, basically an open invitation to every terrorist, every Hamas and Hezbollah and IRGC terrorist come to America. See that? Right? Is there an examples of that? Oh, you mean that one guy you guys tried to pretend with the Hamas member that turned up to be an asset for the Mossade who got caught for that and you all ignored it? Yes, that's the kind of stuff we got. The evidence is not there for what they're actually saying. What was it? I always forget the titles of these. I think it was border.

Starting point is 01:50:24 It was like a word that makes it come up. That's not it. There was the guy that he was a, hmm, what was that? Oh, there it is. Boom. Suspected terrorist at Texas border works for Mossad. Feel free to watch it for yourself.

Starting point is 01:50:44 It's very clear. The whole partisan fake media thing, they were using the picture of a guy who, these aren't the same guy. They're using a picture of a guy who they claim was this guy, but the reality is the time frame proves that he wouldn't even, he's much older now. The end of the day, the guy who they were pretending is this guy who comes from Palestine is actually somebody from, I think it was Azerbaijan, who works for Moss. And what do you remember the video? He's going, you'll know who I am when the time comes.

Starting point is 01:51:08 And all of the right media was like, Hamas, and Israel said. And then when it got exposed that he worked for Assad, everyone stopped talking about it. Isn't that funny? It's just so transparent how this stuff can take. continues to happen. So with him saying this, he wants you to believe that Hamas and Hezbollah, and they're all coming in to kill you. Why? And what's the evidence of that? This is fear. This is hyperbolic fear. And if anything, what most people are sensing, it's a probably, it was most likely it would be something they or Israel conduct to justify their actions.

Starting point is 01:51:41 And I'm not saying you have to believe that. You can call me a conspiracy theorist. I didn't say I believe it's going to happen. It's possible. And you know that. They've done it before. And right now is where we are. It has to be something you consider. And if you genuinely don't know by now that they, any government is willing to fake an event to justify an action, then you do not understand history. And here we are. Max Blumenthal, foreign actors are paying apolitical youth. That's an interesting point, by the way.

Starting point is 01:52:08 I think that's worth diving into another topics, not finding radicalized partisans, but apolitical youth. Guys, I think that's a bigger part of the story that we've realized. People that are just, you know, that aren't even, don't even care that are being, anyway, I want to focus on that another segment, I think, in the future. Anyway, foreign actors are paying a political youth in crypto to carry out low-level vandalism attacks on Jewish sites in Australia, the UK, and Canada. While the real origin of the attacks remains unknown, one nation is aggressively milking

Starting point is 01:52:41 them for political benefit. The gray zone, a mysterious wave of attacks targeting Jewish sites in Canada attributed to a political youth paid in crypto. The gun for higher attacks. mirror those in Australia and the UK. Iran and pro-Palestinian activists are blamed without any evidence, but who benefits? I think it's pretty obvious. So the point overall is that you have people that are driving action. That doesn't mean that there aren't attacks against Jewish people or attacks against Muslims or attacks against Christians. All those things happen. The point is that people abuse those

Starting point is 01:53:11 even when they do happen and then manufacture them when they need to. Our governments have been doing it our entire lives. Here's a perfect example of just that, but this is one to consider as well. Now, I'm not saying that's the case, just generally speaking, since this is something happening in Montreal, and he's showing you an example of some kind of apolitical funded element to create this, and we can show you a long list. I'll take the rest of the next six hours reading off examples of how you can find both Jewish people, Zionist people, or Israeli elements from the government or not, faking anti-Semitic attacks. We saw that all through the protests in Colombia and all of that. So I'm not saying that what this is, but here's a lot. case where RT says Jews targeted, in quotes, in Montreal shooting, diplomat, warning, officer

Starting point is 01:53:56 down in a massive pool of blood as it seems like one of those stories. So I'm sure this will develop. This looks like it was, oh, you know, it's from the 22nd. That's crazy. I thought it was from today. I haven't heard much on this, but my point in general was that we have to understand that there are, there's a lot of manipulation going on about driving people's opinions around very contentious ideas. And right now we can see very clearly that there's an element of that driving around the world to, I mean, from all angles, I would argue, I think our governments are doing this to us every day. So is that part of this? Who's to say? Does it matter that they broke the law? Yes. Does it matter that you could prove whether or not it was a targeted attack against a certain

Starting point is 01:54:32 religion? Absolutely. So when you get into a situation where somebody's going into a restaurant or somebody robs a restaurant and they go, oh, it turns out the owner is Jewish. It must have been an anti-Semitic attack. That's opportunism. And half the time it comes out, you know, he was wearing a Palestine shirt. So therefore, this is what we're dealing with. The crime is what matters to me. I mean, honestly, even if it was the intention to go after some specific person for a specific reason in regard to religion or ethnicity, why is that even the focal point?

Starting point is 01:55:03 Should it matter that they broke the law? Shouldn't it matter that they intended to hurt a person more so than why they wanted to because of their skin color? I mean, this is where we get into this weird situation where is it illegal to hate somebody for a certain, you know, because they have the wrong shoes on or because they're black or white? no it's not actually but it is illegal if you hit them for that or shoot them for that so why then is it suddenly become relevant to say well here's what you see what i'm saying it's because it can be abused i don't know why that's not obvious here's an example by the way of something i didn't even

Starting point is 01:55:34 i don't think maybe i did suddenly thinking like i remember this but i don't when i first saw this i didn't remember this the follow-up anyway we saw this during the height of the columbia thing right that woman that went through with the Kifon is the Nazi sign. Remember? And everyone said, oh, we knew it. Palestinians are Nazis. And it was the dumbest thing in the world. Why somebody would just go through saying,

Starting point is 01:55:54 Hi, Hitler, or whatever? Well, it turns out that woman was given a Nazi salute. It was a kosher cafe owner at a Jewish hospital. I mean, and this is broken up with the New York Post, guys, a group that lies regularly for the Israeli agenda. And it's all been very proven. So does that mean every single person who is anti-Semitism? that, no, it doesn't. And that's a dumb thing to even argue, even to argue that I'm insinuating that.

Starting point is 01:56:18 I am not. What it does mean, though, is that you can clearly see an example where a person, in this case, a Jewish cafe owner is willing to lie about Palestinians because they've been propagandized, because they feel it's in the interest of the Jewish state, because they feel that that's what's in the interest of shutting down the terrorist in this country, all of which is based on an illusion. Because this is what they're pointing to. The woman got stabbed in the eye with the flag. Nope, didn't happen. Stephanic says they were marching through the high school yelling, kill the juice. Nope, the cop said that didn't happen.

Starting point is 01:56:48 I was there. All of them carried on yelling these narratives even when they were proven to be false. You don't need any more evidence than that, at least in these contexts. They're lying for their agenda, period. And she did the same thing. So in a world where you know somebody is willing to go out and pretend to be somebody else and pretend to be what you claim they are because they're not doing that, you don't need any more information.

Starting point is 01:57:10 I don't even care what their motivation is. We have to understand that that's part of the conversation. And we all should know that by now. But there is a special, you know, the height of it in this level of the conversation is more than I've seen it anywhere else. Now, Horat's getting into Iran. Israel needs U.S. aid more than ever. Will Trump give it? So we're talking about all the different money conversation parts of this and the idea that Israel is struggling.

Starting point is 01:57:38 And Americans are starting to push back on all this. Well, at the same time, Israel is stressing that it needs more money. Well, gee, I couldn't figure out why. It's the same point. Both Israel and the United States are spending a lot of money and they failed. So they want your American tax dollars because that's what they always gotten, right? They'd expect it. You better refund us because we just spent that Americans do not agree with that.

Starting point is 01:58:02 But the reason I'm showing this is because this is important to juxtapose with where this goes next, which is the idea. that Donald Trump is asking for $80 billion more dollars for the Iran war. Well, isn't that interesting? Right. So if Trump's asking for $80 billion and pretends that Americans want it, maybe we should start wondering whether that money is going to end up in the hands of somebody else. Here's what Trump said.

Starting point is 01:58:36 So first, because you couldn't hear it, asking for $80 billion more. Do you think Americans support this when so many are struggling? It's a very, very valid question, largely because I think most Republicans, I would argue the majority Republicans are very aware of the fact that gas prices are high and people are struggling and are openly speaking out about that. When I say Republicans or MAGA,

Starting point is 01:58:57 I'm not talking about the fake patriots like Eric and the rest of them. Those aren't even real people in my mind, even if they are. I'm talking about people that actually care that what Trump promised and have not gotten it. Some of them don't care to call it out. I think the majority does. So we're at a point right now where that needs to be clear.

Starting point is 01:59:11 And so I think, hold on, I just lost my thread there. I was putting a video up while I was talking. Oh, right. So she asked a basic question about, you know, doesn't it matter that they're suffering? And my point I was getting at was that obviously it should because largely a lot of Republicans do care about that. But his response is, well, who are you? Oh, you're, you suck.

Starting point is 01:59:31 It's basically his response. But he does answer. But why, what's the, so does it, why does it matter? If it's CNN, Fox News, Washington Post, the question is clearly relevant. So you're doing that to diminish the relevance of the question. do you really think do you believe whoever's listening right now that most americans are that stupid i certainly don't i know a lot of people do i really don't and i think he does though he thinks you're that stupid to just suddenly pretend that that's not i mean it's it's it's it is literally

Starting point is 02:00:02 insulting to your intelligence i would argue you with not a very good group not doing very well not only do they support it not only do they support it they demand it because they won't allow to have a nuclear weapon. Okay, so in case you are confused, he's claiming that you are demanding 80 billion more dollars to go to him for the war with Israel against Iran. The very war that nobody wanted that he promised he wouldn't do. But now he pretends that you're demanding 80 billion more dollars on top of everything else that's been spent in a direction that is way more spending than he promised,

Starting point is 02:00:42 which would be less spending, was what it was promised was. This is just stupid. I mean, you just want to keep trying to highlight. If you're Trump and you, at least I would like to believe, have some insight on people think about you. Maybe he doesn't. Maybe he's in a bubble and that's how he's being controlled. I don't know. But that you recognize that, I would like to believe. And then your response is to just tell us what we think? I mean, I guess the argument would be to try to convince weak-minded people that they're supposed to follow suit because, oh, everybody else thinks that, then I don't want to be

Starting point is 02:01:10 the only Republican that doesn't think that. There are enough weak-minded people to do that. I don't believe it's even close to the majority. But that's what he does. Simply that we have to. not only do they support it, they demand it because they won't allow Iran to have a nuclear weapon. Again, the point which is that they are not even discussing that. And that Iran has said that they're very much going to continue the program because Trump has said that was okay. But here's his answer. I mean, he just got up in front of the G7 and argued that it's acceptable for them to maintain their civilian nuclear program because everybody else does. Yeah, just like we've all been saying.

Starting point is 02:01:43 And yet here he is going never have a nuclear, the one they've never wanted, never had, because even Tulsi Gabbard told you that. So give you $80 more billion because of something that was never actually happening that you claim you're going to stop and probably won't anyway, even if it did. God is stupid. You want to see trouble? Let them have a nuclear weapon.

Starting point is 02:02:01 We're doing very well with Iran. They've been decimated. The guy is just phoning it in, man. They're bad and Navy's gone and then they won. We won. It's over. But you better not run. And if you do, then we're going to bomb you.

Starting point is 02:02:13 But we did. It's over. And the Navy's gone. And the reflective pool, though, cool. I mean, it's just hard to watch. It's like a train wreck right now. We're making a deal with them and we'll see how that all goes.

Starting point is 02:02:23 And not only do they support it, they demand it because they won't allow Iran to have a nuclear weapon. You want to see trouble? Let them have a nuclear weapon. We're doing very well with... Okay. So the question is about the... I'm just forgetting... Rambles and you're like to lose the money, the $80 billion.

Starting point is 02:02:44 Okay, so you want $80 billion more to continue a war that you... are literally in the conversation saying is about to end. Interesting. Because that's just the dumbest thing in the world. And then, but then going on to say that we, it all would, it's,

Starting point is 02:03:00 I guess, okay because they would have gotten a weapon if you don't give me 80 more billion. I mean, guys, it's like this, somebody needs to literally map out how like almost schizophrenic

Starting point is 02:03:10 his rambling has become. I just think it's insane. But so the point obviously is that he wants you to think more money should go because we call for. it because you've successfully already stopped them for getting a bomb. That's why we need more money to continue to, I don't know. You have fun with that. Israel needs more money than ever.

Starting point is 02:03:30 That's my point. That is where it's going. Now, the Senate for the first time has approved a war powers resolution and a rebuke to Trump, which, you know, as always, day late dollar short in my opinion. I mean, I shouldn't say that because effectively it does seem like it's continuing, no matter what Trump continues to spiral out about. I just don't take this at face value. And secondarily, it is a concurrent resolution,

Starting point is 02:03:53 which means it's not binding. Trump's going to ignore it, as he's already said. But it's still good that it's stated and people can see it. The Senate for the first time approved a war powers resolution to Tuesday seeking to block U.S. military action. Had they done this in the first week? It would have been over. Or at least, it would have been a much bigger situation

Starting point is 02:04:13 where Trump was defying an open resolution, you know, Congress shutting down through War Powers Act. I mean, we're still pretending, one, like this is somehow legal in the first place. Well, the very War Powers Act putting this down should prove to you that it's not, because the reality is there was no justifiable reason. Congress didn't approve it. There was no authorization to military force.

Starting point is 02:04:32 And they did not have an preemptive attack justification if that was even a real thing, by the way. The idea they turned into a, that we feel like we're going to be attacked. So we have like an eminent response. That is designed to be a, you're literally attacked. hacking us. And so we have to jump out there and respond. Not that we think by Tuesday you might do something. It's just a bastardization of the reality of this. It's the Bethlehem Doctrine. It is not reality. So this happening now, it would have been a lot better had it happened earlier, but at least it's happening. It was the 10th time the Senate has tried to stop the war, I argue with like designed

Starting point is 02:05:07 to be toothless. And the outcome on a vote of 50 to 48, which apparently the only reason that happened was because two specific people weren't even there. one of them being, I'll get to it a second. I forget his name all of a second, McConnell. But it says, with the resolution is largely symbolic, it does not carry the full force of the law,

Starting point is 02:05:28 which it technically not, it does in a sense, it is congressional, the idea is supposed to be that because Congress decides these things, that the president would just acquiesce. But that's not how this works. Clearly, they'd have no reverence for anything else. So whether Congress,

Starting point is 02:05:45 Congress tells them to or not, I bet you they'd find a way to circabana. They'd yell out article too and do whatever they want, which just shows you how broken this all is. It says it reflects the growing concerns from a number of Republican lawmakers in both House and Senate over both the war and the deal Trump struck with Iran to end it. The House approves the resolution earlier this month. Trump responded angrily Tuesday night on his true social platform calling the vote, and I think this is important, poorly timed and meaningless, saying it provided aid and comfort to Iran. Oh, I see. So now here's your next excuse. First, it was the New York Times was lying, and then it was the people wouldn't let,

Starting point is 02:06:18 or the media wouldn't be truthful. Now it's well, and he actually did blame you. America doesn't have the stomach for what I could have done. Okay. Now, because of the attempt to call out your crimes, that's why it's not happening because you're helping Iran right when I was about to win. That is actually what he's trying to argue. Senate Democratic leader Chuck Schumer said the time after time,

Starting point is 02:06:40 the vast majority of Senate Republicans sided with Trump and his war in instead of the American people. Schumer is an idiot because he'll stand there all day and be like, oh, they hate you. And then absolutely side with Israel every single day of the week or support war against Iran in the Democratic way or rather the Democrat way. They're all a bunch of hypocrites, guys.

Starting point is 02:07:00 They're using this because they know you hate it and they want to win points. They'll do the same thing when their time comes, just like they have every time before this. I know, I'm jaded, but historically, I'm right too. The vote comes as the Pentagon seeking $80 billion from Congress mostly for the Iran War as it back fills munitions and stockpiles.

Starting point is 02:07:18 So all that means is that right now. I mean, you could simply argue all of this is Trump gaining time to restock. And because Israel wants that. I guess we'll find out. But it's good to see that they're pushing back on that, whether it's real or not. But $80 billion because you want it, apparently. And this was, oh, here it was right here. It was four Republicans, Collins, Cassidy, and Murkowski, and Rand Paul joined the Senate

Starting point is 02:07:44 Democrats. Of course, Betterman was the only one opposed. Anyway, the bottom line was that there were two people that weren't present and that's ultimately why they were able to win. Maybe that was by design. It's hard to say. But again, Netanyahu just stated publicly, again, when I came to President Trump,

Starting point is 02:08:05 I told him, we are going into Iran. I did not ask permission. I simply informed him of our plan. Now, if Trump does not say something about this, that speaks volumes. Because this is clearly kind of a tit for tat. It is in Hebrew, but they know about it. People are taught. This is going viral.

Starting point is 02:08:23 So that'll be my mind. It'll be Netanyahu shoving back and then Trump letting him get the last move, which says everything to me. Now, getting into the current, you know, cycle of stupidity that is this Iran conversation right now, you're going to laugh, as always, this is today. So let's start with the ridiculous statement. And even the way Trump talks in this, it's as if he's playing a role. It's like he's on Saturday Night Live.

Starting point is 02:08:49 Guess what he says. Iran's being great. Everything's been agreed to. Guess what? All of that's false. We'll get into that in a second. Here's what he said. And is being very nice.

Starting point is 02:08:59 They're agreeing to everything that I want. And they have to. Otherwise, we just go back and do what we have to do. Oh, yeah, yeah, which was what? To bomb them unsuccessfully and they won. So you're going to go back and just lose again? Is that what you mean? I mean, it's a bluster.

Starting point is 02:09:14 What he's trying to do is make it sound like he's in control to you. And then I guess maybe think that by threatening for the thousandth time that they might do something different, well, that's, I guess, the definition of insanity. I mean, I don't understand. But it's the way he's talking. But realize right now, as we're going to go through, Iran is telling you everything you're saying is false. As of last I checked, everything that said is false. The inspectors, the nuclear conversation, the straight, the toll, the whole thing. We'll go through as quickly as possible.

Starting point is 02:09:43 update from two days ago. But this is what he's doing. I have the same point that I'm like, I don't want to keep, I don't want to keep me. I just keep, I'm exacerbated by it. Like, how does he keep doing that? Truly, guys, every single day and every single, every time he says one more time that we're this close.

Starting point is 02:10:00 We're about to sign the deal and it doesn't happen. I just, I'm like, this is getting comically stupid. It goes over and over and over. It's not even about why, like, even if he wasn't in control, at some point you'd like to think that he'd stand back and go, okay, I'm going to say it differently this time. But I guess not. Because here we are.

Starting point is 02:10:17 So the Qibisi letter, this is from the 23rd, showing what Trump posted. Trump says he has Iran on the ropes, ready to go down for the fall. Then you just say, are you saying we're giving it like, they're giving me everything. It's all great. Oh, but over here, he's going, we got him on the ropes and we're about to win. They're going down. U.S. Senate decides to have a poorly timed and meaningless war. Okay.

Starting point is 02:10:41 So his point was. We were just about to win, and then they did this vote, and it ruined everything. That's what he's saying. So I have the Ron on the ropes, ready to go down for the fall, willing to give us practically anything. That's just, I mean, think about how embarrassing you have to be like this. He knows you don't think that. He knows the, I mean, unless he's in that bubble, which is possible.

Starting point is 02:11:02 Republicans don't think that. Everyone's calling this out, and here he is on two social, yelling the thing that only his blind followers are going to, everyone's going to heart and go, yeah, Trump do the best. Whatever he said, that's the thing. and everybody with the brain is going, God, that's embarrassing. Is he really just, really? For the first time in decades, respecting the hell out of the United States.

Starting point is 02:11:21 Where is that coming from? Who are you talking to? Nobody thinks that. Iran is laughing at you, literally making fun of this post right here. And it's president. It's been okay. And he says, poorly timed and meaningless War Powers Act vote. Well, it wasn't meaningless.

Starting point is 02:11:34 It literally showed you they believe you're breaking the law. Telling the number one sponsor of terror in the world. Oh, we're back to that. that the United States doesn't like what I'm doing to them. Okay, so take a step back. So you're about to give the leading state sponsor of terrorism billions of dollars? You're about to let them not, I mean, you're about to continue. I mean, you go down a list, which that's not what they are, by the way.

Starting point is 02:11:56 I'd not to go through that same old tired point of laughing about how everything they levy in Iran is based on falsehoods. And but even if everything you can prove Iran has ever done that you think is bad, compared to what you can prove U.S. is done. and it is a, it's night and day. The U.S. and Israel have been caught and proven to be involved with so many horrible things, and most of what they're claiming of Iran is false, but you take everything at face value and it doesn't even pales to comparison to what the Israel, U.S. governments have been caught doing, let alone what they actually have been doing.

Starting point is 02:12:26 The world leading state sponsor of terrorism. Oh, you mean, so ISIS, because you guys always tell us ISIS is the leading group, but then ISIS attacks Iran and works with Israel in the United States. This is so stupid, guys. I mean, who's he even talking to right now? Is there any audience out there that's actually buying this right now other than, you know, people that still watch Fox and CNN, that diminishing number?

Starting point is 02:12:46 Four Republican losers voted with Democrats. It's like he's in kindergarten. It's just pretty sad. So it's your fault. Just about to win. Oh, we had it. They were going to go down and they voted. Oh, man, the whole thing fell apart.

Starting point is 02:13:01 So sad. Here he is going oils flowing. It's not, by the way. And here he even got fact-checked on Twitter. This is just clumsily stupid. He says, oil is flowing. Prices are down. Well, the price did go down.

Starting point is 02:13:12 But again, it's much higher than it was before they started the war. So that's a false number. And the world is a safer place. How, I mean, come on. That's just, I guess, projecting what he wants you to think. But here's what he says. Get this 67% of Americans support the Iran peace deal. Well, I said, well, obviously, most Americans support you surrendering and ending the

Starting point is 02:13:34 illegal war you started. That's an obvious one. It's the same majority. that didn't want the war in the first place. Keep framing your failures as victories. You guys are not as savvy as you appear to think you are. In case you missed the point, 67% of Americans obviously want this to stop. Whether they agree with the deal or whether he's failing,

Starting point is 02:13:52 like most Republicans right now who support him think he's failing with the deal because it gives Iran everything he claimed he didn't want to do, right? The other side thinks he's failing for a varying bunch of reasons, but one of the which is not going hard enough if you talk to some Democrats, but also that he is, what is the word I heard them use? The bottom line is that they're criticizing for not doing it in their own partisan ways.

Starting point is 02:14:14 And in the midst of all that, you've got the people that are on his side that didn't want the war to begin with and now are happy to get it to be ended because you're spending money, you're giving money to Israel, and there's even a second, fourth category,

Starting point is 02:14:26 which overlaps with the funding of foreign policy with Israel. The bottom line is, the majority of Americans want this to stop. So if you backed away and gave up entirely, it would be probably more. than that. That extra 30 plus percent is probably people that, or what, it would be, you know, 20 plus percent, people that are angry that you ended it the wrong way. Everybody wants this to stop other than mindless profiteers, authoritarians, merchants of death, but this is what you get.

Starting point is 02:14:55 And as for the, for the podcast, the fact check says it's actually the memorandum of understanding, a 14 point framework reopening the straight of Hormuz and starting 60 days and negotiations. not a finalized peace deal. He can't even get love from his own manipulated platform. So on the straight side of this, we'll talk about the straight, the money, as well as the IAEA to wrap this up. Mint Press News, the straight of Hormuz is still restricted as Iran awaits a full ceasefire in Lebanon. That was yesterday.

Starting point is 02:15:26 As far as I can tell, it's the same thing right now. Restricted, not technically closed entirely, but very clearly restricted to the point to where they shut it down pretty hard the other day. now there was a little bit of let you know kind of release where they let they least they lessened up a little bit but then of course they kept bombing leban on and in the midst of the negotiations over the last few days trump was threatening them and as of right now you just saw another one you better do it or we'll send you back to so and so okay that's right there a violation of the memorandum understanding the threatening violence it's very clear he signed it himself contrary to trump's claims that the straight is completely open

Starting point is 02:16:02 Iran has said that's not the case. And don't forget, you have trackers and GPS. They think you're that stupid. Tehran continues to demand that a full ceasefire implemented, which, by the way, was number one on their signed document, stopping Lebanon entirely. So the Hormuz letter on the 23rd, late end of the day, says Iran has now stopped issuing new permits for the Strait of Hormuz passage,

Starting point is 02:16:28 with only previous permit holders allowed through, and the Iranian Navy, which by the way clearly exists and absolutely is still controlling this exact thing so every time Trump lies about it all being gone he's either continuing to try to just desperately spin out and lie or he actually thinks that because Heg Seth and all of his Israeli assets lie to him.

Starting point is 02:16:48 I mean you take your pick guys. The truth is the Navy is clearly there and you can prove it every day and he continues to lie to you. It says a directly selected and limited number of vessels are currently permitted to pass through the Hermose Daily. Now understand that within this memorandum that happening was a violation. But the only reason it's happening

Starting point is 02:17:08 is because they have not even one moment yet to comply with the memorandum because of the Lebanon bombing and then secondarily because what Trump's done after that. So the argument somehow that they're violating the agreement when the U.S. and Israel have never even once complied is always how this game goes. Now we're going to get into the straight

Starting point is 02:17:26 and the idea of the legality in general of the possibility of a toll. But it says, contradicting Trump's nuclear claim of roughly 10 million barrels of oil transited Monday with more than 70% through the RGC designated route, meaning they're controlling and that they're driving people too. Contradicting Trump's new claim that even Twitter fact-checked him as well, that 19 million barrels flowed that day, which wasn't true, but also it was an all-time record.

Starting point is 02:17:51 19 million is also not even the actual record because 21 million is the record. So not only was it not 19 million, he lied about that, but even if it was, it wasn't the record. I mean, guys, this guy is just aiming for like the worst possible. He can't stop stepping in it right now. I think this is kind of always what he's been. I just don't think he has the support he once did. The alt-to also point out, President Trump said Iran has informed the U.S. that there are no tolls.

Starting point is 02:18:18 That's not true. As he's saying this, Iran's like, that's not true. And guess what? In the memorandum, it literally shows the opposite. Now, it doesn't get into the specifics of it, but it does make it clear of the, I'll get to it in a second. What's it called the International Maritime Organization,

Starting point is 02:18:35 which is what they're setting up to manage this with Oman. It's all very clear, guys, and Trump has been acknowledging this. They even made this clear before. Now, before we get into the legalities of it, what he says was Iran has informed the U.S. that despite trouble making fake news reporting to the contrary, there are no tolls, no insurance costs, no other charges of any kind being sought or received.

Starting point is 02:18:57 Now, sought is obviously a lie, because everyone knows that Ron is at the very least seeking to do that. So why would he lie about that? By Iran on ships traveling the straight. He says this is a false information. This is what makes me think that he is in this world where Whitkoff and the rest come to him and go, don't listen to anything. Fake news everywhere. We'll tell you what Iran really thinks.

Starting point is 02:19:19 But yet then why would he keep saying those things, being believing them, only to turn out that it doesn't go the way he thought it would? Maybe because they come back around and go, no, Iran tricked us again. I don't know. But at some level, you've got to realize there's an anomaly here. Whether he's being tricked or he's lying, I don't know. But I bring it up every time. Negotiations would end immediately. Additionally, no money has been given to Iran.

Starting point is 02:19:41 I think that's false. I'll show you again. Or released from their money to them by the U.S. And here he lies again. We will be releasing some of the money, which, by the way, he just said that wasn't, not in this post, but before this, that none of that was even going to happen at all, ever. And then in a secondary post, he made another point, which contradicts that first one.

Starting point is 02:19:59 it says, well, it'll only, if ever, be after 60 days. Well, here he is again, making it clear we will be releasing some of the money that is totally controlled by us to our farmers and ranchers for purchase of corn, wheat, and soybeans. Well, Iran has very publicly said that's not even remotely true and is not even being discussed. And there's no indication that they're being bound by what they say they have to do with this money yet. It is barely even being discussed.

Starting point is 02:20:21 They've barely gotten past the very first point because they're still bombing Lebanon. Food is desperately needed in Iran. Why? Because you're sanctioning them and you're starving them by design, and you've all publicly said that. And we will be purchasing it for them exclusively from the United States. Each repeat the same statement. Seems to not be true. And it says, this just gets more embarrassing by the moment because the memorandum itself, he signed, contradicts him on all those points. That's how stupid this is. Here is Rubio saying, no country's allowed to charge tolls or fees in an international waterway.

Starting point is 02:20:56 Well, let's talk about that. Here's what he said. Can they guarantee navigation, freedom of navigation in the state? Well, that's the law. It's an international waterway. No country is allowed to charge tolls or fees on an international waterway. It's not one. That's existing international law. He's right, but it's not one.

Starting point is 02:21:18 The way it is. And international waterways all over the world. He's right, but it's not one. That's the way we expect it will be here. So I don't think we have anybody to convince around here in that regard. I think all the countries in this region would agree with us. All right. See you tomorrow. What a cheeseball.

Starting point is 02:21:33 It's just serious. It's just a dumb argument because it's not the case. A simple map. We'll show you that, guys. I've already shown you this. And what's funny is down here, even his own subscriber base or followers, that's a pretty crazy engagement

Starting point is 02:21:46 for a follow-up post to the Department of State. I simply said, well, good thing it's not international waters then. With a very easy map, you can look it up anywhere. You can use Google Maps if you want. It's very obvious, guys. The point is that there is, a choke point at the very middle where it is not international waters. I mean, honestly, I even think the mapping here for those watching, the purple line would be

Starting point is 02:22:07 inside of its international waters. But I even argue this map is almost generous with where international waters is. But regardless, it still ends up showing the same point. That right there, where that green triangle type is, that is only Iranian and Oman waters. That's it. That's where they're talking about. So that quickly removes the lie that it's international waters. what you're getting is all this secondary argument from people going, well, he's right because

Starting point is 02:22:33 there's another law that says they can't do X, Y, and Z. Well, that's not even what Rubio is saying. He's saying it is because international law. So he's not right. Let's be clear about that. He's wrong. No matter what he do, there's a lot of conversation about this. But let's still go out that argument because there's a valid point to be made there.

Starting point is 02:22:48 But again, let's be clear, Rubio didn't make that point. He's going international. So there we're going. Not true. But before we even go to that secondary point, here he is telling you that you can't do that. You can't have a toll because it's international waters, right? Because most of these ports are, you know, the canal are man-made. But that's my point always.

Starting point is 02:23:07 This is not international waters, so it applies the same way. But he's making it clear that if international waters, what she claims this is, nobody's allowed to do that. Here's Trump. The U.S. will begin charging tolls if Varan does not do X, Y, and Z. Okay, that's probably why they go around and go, don't listen to Trump. He's just, he's just bitch. He's talking.

Starting point is 02:23:28 trash or whatever the dumb thing they is the president we're not we're not supposed to take seriously what the president says that's pretty insane but realize that even if that is the case it's still something that means that he still said this so there's only two ways to look at this he's either threatening to do an illegal thing if they don't do what he wants or he doesn't mean what he says and he just lies all the time to get people to do what he wants the bottom line is if it's illegal then it's illegal for trump to do it so why would you say that either way you look at it though it is a technically speaking by the way it would be illegal no matter of What for Trump to do that?

Starting point is 02:24:00 Or the U.S. government? Because it is not international waters, so you'd effectively be setting up an illegal toll on Oman and Iranian waters. But you think that would stop him? As he's framing them for being criminals and illegal, a terrorist? No, guys, these are the worst and most obvious criminals. And I mean worst in a lot of senses. Worst in the most alarming,

Starting point is 02:24:18 but also worse in the most clumsy and obvious criminals in the world as far as I can tell. You know, the same ones that pretend to be fighting terrorism that they fund and operate and fly around the world. Robert Barnes, former Trump supporter, it seems, says U.S., it's illegal and unconscionable to charge fees to exit the straight. You know why he's saying that? Because Lindsey Graham adds a little bit of nuance to this. And this is where it's coming from. It's a penalty.

Starting point is 02:24:44 It is a punitive thing, right? We can't let them do that, even if it's legal. So we're going to step in and do ours on the other side. Screw you guys. Your petulant children. Let's try a diplomatic solution. I think it's going to fail. What happens next?

Starting point is 02:25:00 Next, I spent four and a half hours with President Trump Friday. Here's what I think will have. Yeah, the guy that's hated by all Republicans, but somehow always gets voted in and loves Israel, but yet Trump always endorses him and hates all the people that Trump pretended to lean into before the election, like Massey and all the rest. Again, you just can't make this any more clear. Next, if this deal fails, President Trump is going to take the straight of harm moves over by force. Which would be a crime, by the way. United States will control the straight of Hormuz.

Starting point is 02:25:33 We'll charge a fee for all those who go through to pay for the operation. Okay, so you're literally going, we're going to do the thing that we just screamed. It's completely illegal to do no matter what. But we'll do it, though, because freedom. Got it. And we're going to expand the Abraham Accords and calendar year 2026. We're going to get Saudi Arabia joined to Abraham Accords. So what does that to do within it?

Starting point is 02:25:57 Why would you suddenly include the normalization with Israel into the idea that you control, the street. What, I mean, yet you're both fighting Iran, but what does that have to do? Well, guess what, guys? Because the whole damn thing for them is about Israel. And if you haven't picked up on that by now, I don't think you're paying attention. That's about forcing people to normalize with Israel for the interest of Israel. How does that benefit Americans? And which is the biggest change in 5,000 years in the mid-east. And if Iran contest, control of the straight-up hormones by the United States will will blutterate them. Oh, yeah, yeah.

Starting point is 02:26:30 You mean, like you said you were going to? Didn't you already do that? Think about the weakness of these kind of people, continuing to argue you're going to do something that you just said you were going to do and failed at doing. I think these arguments are aimed at us right now. Because, you know, you think they think Iran is over there shivering? Maybe they do.

Starting point is 02:26:48 Maybe they're that far out of touch. I don't know. But it's about propagandizing you for the interest of a foreign power. I think that's what this is. So to all the people listening, if this diplomatic effort fails. Which is what? President Trump is going to take the straight of hormones.

Starting point is 02:27:05 We're going to run it. We're going to try to get Saudi Arabia joined Abraham, of course. Again, like it's the same conversation because to him, it very much is. But recognize, what do you think Iran does when they hear this, guys? Now, to be clear, as I always point out, Lindsay Graham ranting his nonsense on face the nation is not the same as the president, right? It's another politician ranting things, but it does mean something. He is in Congress.

Starting point is 02:27:28 very influential and Trump seems to listen to him for whatever stupid reason. And so Iran hears this and goes, oh, okay, why would it make a deal then? If Trump is just going to do what he wants, no matter what, and steal things and break the law, then why are we going to pretend he's going to uphold it? They know that, guys. And that's why they're clearly every day and we'll finish even more today, hold the cards. Or at least they think they do because they're standing the ground. Trump continues to waffle back and forth and yell threats and stand back and go, they're being super nice but we're going to kill you and then they go we want the same 14 points bring it or bring it or shut up every single time you can't really deny what that shows you so here he is going we're

Starting point is 02:28:04 going to take it by force it just gives them another point to go fine f off into arab israeli conflict in 2026 and if ron continues to attack israeli 11 force into arab israeli Conflict. We're going to try to get Saudi Arabia to join the Abraham, of course, into Arab-Israeli conflict. And as he mumbles to end the Arab-Israeli conflict. Right, because it's all, it's about every Arab in the world fighting Israel. These people are such monsters. It's not the truth. And what it shows you in reality is that that's what they see it as. Arabs are their enemy. You just, you got to be clear about that, guys. Look at people like Loomer who scream it every single day.

Starting point is 02:28:45 In 2026, and if Iran continues to attack Israel and Lebanon, the new policy will be will hit Iran. So, oh, got it. So if Israel, if Israel keeps doing the thing that everyone told him to stop, that Trump said he'd make them stop, that Trump signs saying they would stop, will bomb Iran. Got it. To the Iranians, if you're listening. When you use Hezbollah to attack Israel, I think the new policy will be, we will attack Iran. guys guys such a transparent stooge against american interests and that's what that's what the law the lawyer is saying

Starting point is 02:29:24 it's illegal and unconscionable for them to do this also the u.s we're going to seize astray right it's the same point and we would and wonder why we would have a global confidence crisis in the united states trump comes out and says iran has informed us oh this was the one i was just reading but so the point was again. No tolls, no insurance costs, no other drones of any kind. Here he is posting a, I guess, a clip from Fox News that says straight to promote traffic. Some, I guess, some arbitrary number of, look, June 12th to 14th. 32. Well, suddenly in this completely weirdly uncomparable 19th to 23st, 93, hashtag winning. Well, I simply said, well, I said, fix it for you. So the same exact three-day You know, what was it, 100 a day, generally, I think was the average compared to June 19th, 21st, compared to the pre-war time frame, the exact time.

Starting point is 02:30:21 390, the 93. So there are a bunch of ridiculous clowns. I mean, look, whether he doesn't know this and thinks because Fox said it, it must be true, I really think some of these idiots watch these platforms and think they're being informed as the president, as the Congress. But realize that he is, if not just lying to you because he wants you to think that his floundering position, is somehow winning. You realize the street was open before this started. So by him even highlighting an increase is simply going, I'm bringing back what I took from you.

Starting point is 02:30:52 But this would be the accurate framing, right? June 19th to 21st, previous year, 390. 93. You're failing. Now, in this conversation about, it's the, what was it called again? The, where is it? I'm going to make sure I get the name of it right.

Starting point is 02:31:12 the oh yeah the unc lOS straights used for international navigation this is part three now this is one of the arguments people are making for why even if it's not international waters which i always love how that works right even if it's not international waters here's why it's still correct okay well let's first address that that means they're wrong though right can we agree on that no he's not wrong well you just said that it's even if it's not so even that would be it's not international waters. So in that hypothetical, you know, partial conversation, even if it's not,

Starting point is 02:31:43 would mean they're wrong. No, no. Trust me, I've gotten into this online right now where there are people arguing that Ruby of what he said is correct. What he just said is right, but he just said it's international waters. It's not, though. And you can get people to admit that it's not, but then secondarily go, but here's why he's still right and point to this. But he said it was in, it's banging your head against a brick wall. People are very stupid today. But also a lot of people are dishonest or a lot of people are not even real. But the idea is, you know, here is that because of this UN kind of global agreement around trafficking, traffic lanes and water, that this is somehow the reason why even if it wasn't international waters that Iran wouldn't be able to do this.

Starting point is 02:32:23 Now, really, some of these, you could read through all this, I highlighted the specific parts in this, but scope of the section, the section applies to Straits were used for international navigation between one part of season. It gets in specifically areas that might not be international. He says, if straits referenced in articles 37, all ships and aircraft enjoy the right of transit passage shall not be impeded. But that doesn't not, that impeded is not necessarily a toll. Plenty a place around the world have, even whether they're man-made or not, have a process for tolls and we don't consider that being impeded in international traffic. But it says Article 42, laws and regulations relating to transit passage, subject to the provisions

Starting point is 02:32:57 of this section, states bordering straits may adopt laws and regulations related to transit passage through streets. I find that relevant. It says states, bordering straits shall not hamper transit in passage and shall give appropriate publicity. Now, the argument is that would mean you can't toll them, right? And there's a few other parts in there. This article from the Center for Transportation highlights, it says, but while the UN Convention on the law of the seas, that's the UN CLS, CLOS, establishes the legal framework for international shipping and makes clear that the international straits, such as the Strait of Pramuse,

Starting point is 02:33:33 even at the choke point being not international waters, it is. considered an international straightforward transit, could not be told under that framework. Iran has not ratified that treaty, and therefore the relevance is uncertain. It says, in other words, Iran's position, and this is the same thing that Israel pulls with the National Proliferation Treaty in the Nuclear Conversation, right? In other words, Iran's position is that the law of the C's treaty should be interpreted as treaty law, but not international law. And since Iran is not a party to the treaty, which they are not, because they have never ratified

Starting point is 02:34:05 The country is not bound by the rules regarding passage through the Strait of Fremuz. That is a roundly accepted reality for people. If it hasn't been ratified, it's not bound by law and says this is an important distinction because the UN's Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties from 1969, Article 34, states, quote, a treaty does not create either obligations or rights for a third state without its consent. It says, interestingly, the U.S. is also not party to the UN Convention on the laws of the seas. Interesting. has historically considered portions of the UN CLOS to be customary international law and binding

Starting point is 02:34:40 on non-party states. But there are also the elements in which the U.S. does not adhere to. Don't you love that? Including the treaty's seabed mining regime. Great. So the U.S. is able to selectively pick and choose what it gets to follow. But a person who's not even part of this, not a party to it, never ratified it. They can somehow go, you have to abide by it, even though we don't. That is a perfect reality for what the U.S. is in the world today. rules for the not for me as part of their ten point peace plan remember this is back in april i believe april tenth there you go back when it was still ten points not fourteen either way it was the same ten points with four additional and they've stood by that ever since the iran proposed formalizing

Starting point is 02:35:22 the tolls on transit through the strait of promos with proceeds being split between iran and oman guys this is on their conversation it's in the very memorandum that they're all pretending trump didn't sign and yet here we are lying about it so what i want you to think think about is two things. One is that the idea that you can force a treaty you create that they're not a part of to change the laws for them while you're not even following laws of the very treaty you're pointing at them. I mean, it just shows you what they're what they are. They're criminal. But the other part of this would be that you have the idea of what, why any country would have to be bound by the justifications of, like, this is your

Starting point is 02:36:00 international waters. What do you, look, look here, just to compare it. Take what the U.S. it's able to do in its international water, or other its territorial waters. Are you think that the U.S. would bow to interest of anybody else in the world if they suddenly decided to claim that something they control is in the interest of everybody else? No. And the U.S. regularly manipulates freedom of transit, freedom of navigation, rather, all over the world.

Starting point is 02:36:27 They just bombed another boat that was in the international waters. They claim was doing something they thought was illegal with no evidence. You just can't apply it one way or not the other guy. So this to me, simply because they're not a party to it, doesn't apply to them by every reality of international law. But, or continuing anyway, I think that was it on that. So the point here is that this is a valid point who made, one, if it will first for Rubio's, if it was international, it's not. And two, if this was actually something they were a party to, you could argue that it would apply, but it's nuanced whether or not it even applies to a toll. So even then, it would have to be debated by lawyers because what it really gets into is whether a toll is impeding that transit.

Starting point is 02:37:05 based on other traffic as not. So it's still wildly up in the air, even with these new points. But on top of all that, Oman said that it's coordinating with Iran, which is the international maritime organization to provide a temporary maritime corridor for vessels transiting transfermeuse. Now, on the gas side of this,

Starting point is 02:37:25 which is fluctuating depending on the idea of what the reality of the memorandum is, as well as the ongoing war, because we've seen the gas prices kind of fluctuate. Last I checked, it was 70, I think. Trump threatens oil companies. He recently in the Oval Office named Exxon. I think it was Sheld, calling out these companies.

Starting point is 02:37:48 He says, just a reminder that Trump signs, Trump threatens oil companies over gas prices, just a reminder that Trump campaigned on $2 gas. The big oil companies are not dropping their price at the pump, commensurate with the sharply lower prices they are paying for oil. You know what I think? I think he's been trying to give them, secret things around the back so that they aren't paying as much in hoping that would translate

Starting point is 02:38:12 to the pumps. But you have to realize they know this is fluctuating. They know that it's dangerous for them to follow what Trump does because it changes on it. He lies all the time. So my point is I think he gave them something. He's pissed off. They didn't do what he wanted. But it says those prices, that's all my opinion.

Starting point is 02:38:26 Those prices are dropping like a rock, he says. Not really. And frankly, they're still higher than when you started. In other words, customers are being gouged. He wants you to just take it personally. now the very problem of the gas prices he shucked onto the companies and trump tried to save you and the companies who are probably secretly run by democrats hate you that's probably what's happening i have instructed the doj to immediately start looking into this are you kidding me gasoline prices

Starting point is 02:38:51 better start going down okay well let's make the obvious point then about whether or not i thought i had that what's right here about whether or not trump is anti-capitalist i mean think about what they would do if Biden was saying even a fraction of that. It's pretty crazy, isn't it? Well, first of all, on the gouging side of it, here's even Fox News telling you that's not even true. And I'm sorry to make you listen to Fox News as well as this person, but it's interesting to see it on Fox News when he's making that major claim that's supposed to be guiding his party. I mean, I guess what's so surprising is the peak under Biden in the summer of 2022 was $5 at the pump. And I think the peak that we got this summer was $450.

Starting point is 02:39:34 No, it was much more than that in some places, and we all know that. And I think we're down to four. Maybe the average is now a little bit under that. Which is way higher than it was before this started. I guess I sort of disagree with the notion that there's price gouging going on. I think big oil and then companies at the pump, like a Chevron at your local corner station, they're dropping prices, but they're also having to refill all of the inventories that were depleted. So you're not going to go.

Starting point is 02:40:02 Amazing to see some logic on Fox News. CNN, right? Yeah, they have to make up what you basically drain them of. Secondarily, why would they trust that it's going to get better right now? Iran is going, Trump's lying about everything. They see all of that. So they're going to go, whoa, this is going to fluctuate more. We all know that. Or rather, it just seems very likely that it's going to fluctuate again. So why would they change? They're going to take the benefits, whatever he's giving them, and they're going to hold the line because they think it's going to get worse like a lot of us do. Or at the very least, that's how I read it. But what she's saying is accurate. Simply that there are

Starting point is 02:40:32 other things that. So Trump then stands up and goes, lower the prices. Is the president allowed to dictate what companies can charge? That's not what it's supposed to be like, but they'd love to, you know, communism and socialism. It's just, it's government, guys. And all of them will do that when they want to. Defense Production Act or whatever else. It's all the same direction. It's just about how they frame it. Back down to 65 box or like a 250 at the pump, because you have to replenish all of the inventory that we drain, particularly. from the SPR. So until you do that, there is still more demand than there is supply. Yep, that's basic economics, guys. And of course, Trump might not even understand that, I guess,

Starting point is 02:41:13 but I don't think that. I think he's just lying to you. But the, the, that's the term, right, for the, for the stockpile of the oil. I mean, this, I was just reading more on this about the amount that they're supposed to be held with something like 300 something barrels. And the end of the day, or $300 million. The point was, though, that because of the way they were stored, if I remember correctly, this is just a theory that because of the way they're stored, I mean, there is a valid point about degradation that does happen. Like, that's 100%.

Starting point is 02:41:42 It can happen, rather. And it does. To what degree, it's debatable. And it varies on certain factors. But based on the degradation factor that what they claim is $300 million might be somewhere around $100 million when it actually comes to having it. And they claim it's like $20 million plus a day that's being used. And so that is an alarming, like lower than I think they said in decades that it's been.

Starting point is 02:42:03 And that's for the benefit of every, including Israel, by the way, at the expense of Americans, right to the gas pump. You don't think Americans see that and know who's responsible? Guys, that's why this is all so uncertain and why so many Republicans have turned on them. Why Tucker and the rest are like, we're done with the GOP, whether it's opportunists or not. That's why I think it's happening. So all of this is created, if not by incompetence because of some larger agenda. and even Fox News can recognize that.

Starting point is 02:42:29 And so refilling that stockpile is going to take a while. And so everyone is in that position. So for him to force them to do it, it's going to be at their expense. I doubt that'll happen. But watch as we start some new kind of war over this for his failing reputation is what it feels like. And on that note, he comes out and says, oil prices are tumbling down. The world is much safer. And Twitter comes in and goes, well, that's not true.

Starting point is 02:42:54 You just can't make this crazy. and they call out the fact that he was lying about this. And I simply said, well, the only thing tumbling down is Trump's reputation. And I think that's pretty clear. Maga Voice, one of these kind of fake faceless, this is one of those accounts that was caught for having like 17 different versions of the same thing. And it's all, it's like bots. But it says at 12, 12 a.m., President Trump put every oil company on notice to start dropping

Starting point is 02:43:18 oil prices. He's right. Stop gouging them. So if Biden came out and said, you start lowing prices because of what I think they should be, they'd all scream. socialism. Because they're all hypocrites, guys. That's the point. The Horowitz letter in regard to the money, Iran's chief negotiator, Ghalibov, has finalized the immediate release of $12 billion. This is from yesterday in frozen Iranian assets during

Starting point is 02:43:44 the Switzerland talks, saying implementation is now urgently underway for Iranian media. And just to be clear, we should never take any of these media left, right, Iranian, US, at face value. But just like I said, said about Morandi, just the other day, just make the point, if you're just going to stand back and look at the consistency, just let's take since April. Iranian media has been right more often than not. Morandi has been right almost every time he said something. Now, I can point to one where it didn't end up happening, but I think that was because the direction changed, not that he was wrong about what he predicted. Now, that doesn't mean that you trust what he says every time. It doesn't mean you

Starting point is 02:44:19 should blindly accept. It's just showing you that for whatever reason, they continue to be on the, they're saying, we're going to do this, and they do. Trump goes, they're about to be defeated and then falls and lies or says, we're going to kill you and that doesn't do it, then goes to make another deal over and over and over, and their stance stays the same. So my point is when you read what he says or what they're writing, consider that they've been correct more often than not so far while still question them. Then consider that Trump has been lying almost consistently this entire time, but maybe he's right next time.

Starting point is 02:44:49 It's just, it's being objective in understanding the precedence and the reality of where we are. This directly contradicts Vance's new claim that no money is being released. See that? He is simultaneously saying that while Trump is saying the opposite, or rather by Iran is, but Trump has also said that in both of the memorandum, but also publicly. Iran also refused to use the unfrozen funds for U.S. agriculture. At the same day, they're screening it's going to happen. Even today, Trump said it again, and Iran's going, that's just not true, saying Iran has no obligation to buy products from the United States because they don't. Nowhere in there do I see that. under the existing agreement, rejecting Vance and Jared Kushner's framework.

Starting point is 02:45:28 They just want Americans to somehow convince that somehow giving the money to the people you call terrorists is going to somehow backwardly benefit you. Oh, good. ISIS is going to shop in your store. It'll all work out. Now, that's not what I think. That's what they're framing is, but think about how dumb that is. And again, it's not shopping at your store, but I'm just trying to make it a point.

Starting point is 02:45:46 But Iran says agreement reached with U.S. to release 12 billion in frozen funds. This is from June 23rd. Now, this is what we keep seeing is these arguments. about this being released, like as we speak, two sums of $6 billion were released, according to Ghalybath. He added that the initial arrangements had already been made during the trip to Cutter. So what that suggests is that the $6 billion from half of it has already going on. And this is what I was reporting from before and the money that's in Qatar.

Starting point is 02:46:14 Here is a more specific example from June 13. This is right about the time when this was happening. And this is what I believe. And I think this is true. And I believe that this is one of the concessions that Trump gave to try to get Iran not to bomb Israel in response, which was we'll give you some of that money right now. The money that he knows they're going to have to give at some point anyway, and he's trying to make, massage it into some kind of a win. Reports say UAE agreed to release up to 20 billion to Iran. And remember, this is their money, money that the U.S. stole from them.

Starting point is 02:46:43 It is indicated that more than $3 billion has already been moved as part of this understanding. Now, that's coming from the Iranian side. But I think it's very much worth considering that with all that we've seen, all the lies from one side and all the truth from the other, whether or not they're honest, and the reality that there was a concessions given. And they did respond to it. And right now they're saying $6 billion. I mean, I think it's pretty clear, guys, that Trump is trying to find a way out of this. And he already gave them money. It's their money anyway.

Starting point is 02:47:10 And now they're trying to find a way to not let that embarrass them. Iran says six billion frozen assets in Qatar will be released as part of the preliminary deal, the preliminary deal with. the U.S. June 21st. Oh, I looked this up a second ago. What was it? That's so frustrating. I don't often do that because I just almost don't even care that much at the time to learn

Starting point is 02:47:33 the names of politicians. I'm sure you guys notice that. But do it real quick for fun. I just did this too. I'm curious what it was again. Bray keeps doing that. If you go back and go forward, it usually does it for you. There we go.

Starting point is 02:47:50 Okay. Let's see what it says. Pesachian. Peschian. Peschian. Interesting. President Masoud Mazud Pryscian said on Sunday that $6 billion in frozen assets in Qatar, which is what we've been talking about, will be returned to Tehran as part of the preliminary deal.

Starting point is 02:48:13 With the start of the negotiations from today on the 21st, the $6 billion we have in Qatar will also be unfrozen and returned to our country. So you guys take it for what you will. I do believe that's already happened. Now, remember, the affinity, what was it called, you know, the Middle East sovereign wealth fund. This is what Trump was claiming this $300 billion was going to be kind of facilitated through and claiming it's going to be all from these other countries that apparently were bombed by Iran that they're not going to gain from. Like, I just don't believe that.

Starting point is 02:48:46 I don't believe these countries are going to just give up billions of dollars because Trump doesn't want to lose. So either way, though, wherever it ends up going, I believe in some way, even though, even though I'm not saying this is what they claim or what the data shows, I get the sense it will somehow come from American tax dollars in some way, even if that's like funding these foreign countries for their foreign defense, and then half of that gets used for that. It's like it'll be like a shell game, guys. But either way, whether I'm wrong about that or not.

Starting point is 02:49:09 New York Times, Jared Kushner's private equity firm, this unelected appointee who even the people in the mediation called an Israeli asset, his firm, Affinity Partners, is actively seeking to raise $5 billion. dollars or more in new funding from the Middle East sovereign wealth funds. And as Glenn Greenwald points out, Jared Kushner's corruption and profiteering from U.S. policy that he directly shapes has no parallel in its magnitude and brazenness. He and the Trump family are showered with billions in new personal wealth from the exact

Starting point is 02:49:46 Persian Gulf dictatorships most affected by their decisions. It's not a, it's mean, guys, it's transparent. So all we're showing you is that now you're going to, there's going to be a process through which they wildly profit as they pretend to rebuild what they destroyed. There's the points you made about the larger technocratic conversation, about the rebuilding of Gaza in the new freedom city discussion. Now, that is part of this. Whether or not this is all in that direction, like this is all in the effect to get that to happen,

Starting point is 02:50:18 it's hard to say. I mean, that's something I would, I mean, with comes to Gaza, very much possible. I just feel like there's a lot of moving parts to this. And I do think there's a very, very large vein of people in this administration and larger agendas that are almost solely focused on the technocratic change, on the network state agenda. And so I think they're possibly one and the same. But I just, what I'm saying is I don't know if that is the only thing you're seeing

Starting point is 02:50:45 here because that's one of the things going around. And it's something you should not ignore because it really does seem to line up with this larger kind of transition, right? But either way, you're not. seeing them sort of get to decide how this gets rebuilt. If that's how that goes, Iran's not going to allow that, but that's what seems they're trying to do and that Kushner is going to wildly profit through that transaction. It's disgusting.

Starting point is 02:51:07 You're killing people and profiting on the rebuilding. It's disgusting. Well, as you already saw, and as we already briefly pointed to, but I'll show you again to finish here, here's what Trump said about the International Atomic Energy Agency. And again, in case you haven't heard it today, every single one of these claims, as I've already showing you some have been outright denied by Iran over yesterday and today saying that's just not true. Oh, they're wrong. Oh, okay. Simple. They're wrong. They're wrong. They know they're wrong. They told us inside. Got it. Okay. So Trump continues to say, they secretly told me they will.

Starting point is 02:51:49 Okay. You know, look, this is what I keep saying. Maybe they did. Maybe tomorrow will find out that that's what they agreed to and it's all over. But every time before this that Trump has made those kind of statements and said, no, no, no, fake news. that Iran said they're, say, desperate, and they'll take whatever we give them. I just played you a clip where Trump said they're super nice and they're giving me everything. Okay. Then reconcile those two points. That was yesterday. Here you are now saying that.

Starting point is 02:52:15 How do you make sense? If they gave you everything, why is there any discrepancy? You don't even need to be this specific. You can tell he's lying, guys. Everybody can. And like I said, up until this point, every time he's done that, it's been, it's come to, you know, it's come to pass where he turns out to be lying or lied to every time. probably the case here.

Starting point is 02:52:33 You have it down 100% inspections. And if they were right, I'd cancel the meetings right now. So do you have it, though? In all the other times where they turned out to be right, and you got caught lying, you didn't cancel the meetings then. By act brought out. When will you, Mr. President? When will those inspectors actually be on the ground at the appropriate time?

Starting point is 02:52:53 At the appropriate time. When will they be there? No, the appropriate time. You know, whatever. Maybe, maybe not. No rush, but they'll be on the ground of the appropriate. No rush. They can't have a nuclear weapon.

Starting point is 02:53:05 They want to kill everybody. They want to kill all the Jews. They hate you for your freedom. But yeah, no rush. Whatever. Do whenever we get to it. Guys, you just can't make fun. You can't make up this kind of ridiculousness.

Starting point is 02:53:18 It is a, I mean, this needs to be some kind of a show at some point, like the entire thing. Maybe that's the whole point. Maybe that's what it is. Okay. Well, to make the point again, we made in the last show, as Vance said on the 22nd, yesterday we had a very good day well iran came through and said you lied about everything and they're not up they're not doing anything you said they would write them so bantz is lying or he was lied to same old same old but he goes we made a lot of good progress they did not

Starting point is 02:53:44 he says the iranians have agreed to invite the international atomic energy agency okay the simple way to understand this without getting into every part of the detail or all the details the international atomic energy agency's last inspection of iran's facilities entirely was february 2026 do you remember what happened in february they bombed them on the Now, the reality is that inspection took place after the bombing of the 12-day war, but it wasn't to every single one of the locations. They weren't even able to get in to the ones that were completely bombed. Now, the IAEA put on a statement simply saying, okay, we have a schedule and we normally inspect them, but we weren't able to. And that was because of the Israeli-U.S. war.

Starting point is 02:54:23 And they framed that as somehow the group going, Iran's hiding everything. That's not what was happening. Now, since February 28, when they bombed them again, and now, and, and, you know, and in general murdered their religious leader, bombed multiple examples of their negotiations, killed citizens in public areas, all this stuff. The idea is that they said, we're not doing this right now.

Starting point is 02:54:46 In the midst of a war, where they're about to be destroyed, Iran saying, look, we're not doing, and secondarily, having every right to say, we're not doing this while we're at war, the idea is this is an institution, a thing that's been set up

Starting point is 02:54:56 to investigate something they have a right to do in the first place, that they're not doing anyway. and now when they have leverage, why would they then be bound by that? There's no legal setting that says they can't have nuclear weapons or nuclear civilian programs. Every country in the world has the right to do that.

Starting point is 02:55:11 So this is something they're choosing to comply with, and then they still go after them. So my bottom line point is they were allowing them freely to investigate their facilities and complying with it right up until they started the war. And on the 28th, in fact, as you remember, the Omanian foreign minister said very clearly, we're in reach. Peace is right here.

Starting point is 02:55:31 They've agreed to give up their enrichment program and give up the enriched material. They've never done that before. We could actually have peace. Guess what? Israel bombed them that night. Why you ask? Because they were going to give up the enrichment. Because Israel needs the lie that they're doing this to justify taking the country. The last inspection was February.

Starting point is 02:55:51 Why do they stop? Because they were bombed by Israel in the United States. So this is the return, whatever he's framing right here, to what Iran was freely doing before they were illegally attacked. Another fake win for Trump. Aha. But on top of that, it actually doesn't even seem to be real. And that's the comical part of all of it. And that's why I explained it the way I did, because I think Iran is in a position to say,

Starting point is 02:56:12 guess what? You gave us this leverage. We're not going to go back to that now. We were completely willing to do it before because we don't even want a nuclear weapon. But now, why? We don't have to. We don't need, we're within the law. We're not breaking the law.

Starting point is 02:56:24 You're the one that's breaking the law. We're not going to do that. we're still not going to seek a nuclear weapon. We'll happily promise that. But my point in all of it, I can see a world in which they let them back to investigate it anyway because they don't want these weapons. But in my opinion,

Starting point is 02:56:38 and I think the evidence backs that up, even if they were. It's like saying the straits now open. It was open before. You are framing your failures as your victories. That's all you're doing. And that's pathetic. And a lot of people that don't know any of this

Starting point is 02:56:51 think he just won everything. No nukes and inspections. Oh my God. Trump just saved the world. and they really think that, even though the JCPOA was a very similar thing, if not exceptionally better, because of everything that it had and because they applied. They did not do all that we went through and spend all this money. But at the end of the day, Trump violated that too.

Starting point is 02:57:10 Now, this is not some praise of Obama. Honestly, why that ultimately went, happened. It's hard to say. The reality of Trump breaking the JCPA was because of Israel driving him to do so because they claimed they were seeking nukes. They were not. And they complied with it even after Trump left. And then on top of that, as I've shown many times, the argument of 60% to a thousand pounds

Starting point is 02:57:30 is also within their agreement. The agreement they maintained well after Trump violated the JCPOA and made it defunct. And that is what they then lied about with Whitcalf and said, oh my God, they lied and said, all they had this secret material. Nope. As I've shown a thousand times within their own document, it says very clearly that it is within their agreement, within the safeguard in accordance with their comprehensive safeguard agreement, 60%.

Starting point is 02:57:54 now the only reason that happens is because they were allowed to enrich it like anyone is and they had been increasing it because Trump had broken that deal now overall the same point you made is whether they can increase that to 90 percent which we needed beyond that to make the material needed to make the bomb they don't have the enrichment facility to do that right now which has been verified and in the material they claim is obliterated and bombed it's dust or whatever like all these ridiculous arguments all of their own arguments prove to you that they're not doing what they claim. But even if they were, it's within their safeguard agreements. And the 60% showed they actually still have that access to it. It wasn't obliterated. It was, it would take a long

Starting point is 02:58:31 time to reach the actual point. If you ask anybody, ask nuclear scientist, ask the conversation, like the, who was just talking about that? God, I forget his name. Anyway, the point is that the argument, and these are things that get into levels of conversation that most people don't understand. You know, myself being one of them, like the technological level of this stuff. but Scott Horton is a good example of somebody who went on Pierce and did a great job breaking down the illogical reality of even if they had the capability of if they would eventually be able to do so even if they even though they don't want to is what I meant to say but the point is the 60% to 90% is a whole stretch then without the facility we're talking

Starting point is 02:59:13 years to actually build the facility and then another whatever they would argue six months to even get at that point then to be able to build the bomb itself they don't have the technology to build the bombs that we know of today. As Scott Horton, very clearly points out, it would be something like what we saw in World War II. And that would not be able to be shuttled around the world and used secretly. So it's just an obvious game they're playing. But good thing.

Starting point is 02:59:34 They have inspectors again. Not a new thing, but guess what? They lied about that too because they don't need to do that again. But the U.S. President Donald Trump says Iran has agreed to the highest level of nuclear inspections. And there will be no further negotiations if they fail to comply. You see? And that's what he said yesterday.

Starting point is 02:59:51 day when that was being discussed. And the truth is that Iran, the idea that they would need to have those is not even part of the deal. So why would that be complied? It becomes a really silly game he's playing. Now, to finish with Lebanon, so you understand that it's still happening, Donald Trump is allowing Israel to continue to bomb Lebanon. Or Israel's doing it because he's not in control.

Starting point is 03:00:11 You take your pick. The reality is that's a violation of the memorandum in and of itself. They all know that. Trump has admitted that. He signed the document. So there is no confusing part of this. They've never once been in compliance with the memorandum to this very point. And that's why when they somehow met last time or somewhat met, what they say,

Starting point is 03:00:28 well, we're not even getting close to talking about the nuclear conversation, even though we're in this supposed 60 days, because you have yet to comply. And they left. Now, as of today, I'm not sure, but that's what keeps happening. But here is when he gets asked about this. This is the, when he gives this kind of an answer, you know he's insecure. That's my opinion. He's another beauty.

Starting point is 03:00:52 What's this one? Is it a real beauty guy? He starts out by making fun of him. Oh, look at this guy. This real beauty. Like, real big, tough guy with all of your big suits behind you. You know what I mean? Like the idea, oh, look at my, look at everybody laugh at this guy.

Starting point is 03:01:04 He's a dumb fake news guy. Well, they're all fake news. All of them in front of you. Left right, corporate news, fake. I'm Fox News. Your new media guy. It's funny to me, right? He does that to set the tone for people that blindly follow him.

Starting point is 03:01:16 Oh, whatever he says next, we're supposed to ignore. Go ahead. That's what he's doing. He's another beauty. What's this? Well, is it real beauty. Well, early today, the Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said his forces are not leaving Lebanon. Right.

Starting point is 03:01:31 We all heard that. The whole world heard that. Ben Kabir said it. Smokers said it. Most of their military said it. The president said it in Israel. Netanyahu publicly said it. We're not leaving.

Starting point is 03:01:40 It's not on the table. The memorandum does not bind us. We're not a party to it. Even though all of that's false. Everyone heard that because Netanyahu screamed it across every platform. Most mainstream newslet headlines talked about that. Here's his response. Who did he tell that to you?

Starting point is 03:01:57 He said it publicly. Well, we're going to take a look at it. Well, I'm not going to tell you what I'm going to do, but it gets solved. I'm a problem solver. I get problems solved real fast, including with BB. Go ahead. Oh, yeah, yeah. And then what happened?

Starting point is 03:02:11 Nothing. Then the next day, nothing happened. And BB's right now bombing Lebanon. But he loves it out. I can do whatever I want. I'll just have to speak to BB. It'll be over. Next question.

Starting point is 03:02:20 fake news. It's just, it's pathetic, guys. Like, it's, I'm, I have a lower opinion of this man way lower than I did last administration than almost any president that I've ever had to cover. And it's just, it's not about left and right. It's because this guy is a special kind of, like, and again, it's worse now than it was before. He has degraded in some kind of way that's hard to miss. And it's not about picking on his age. It's just, it's obvious in the way that he's unable to sort of, because I pointed out in the first administration, he had sort of a way of kind of rambling in a way that would manipulate you. But today, I think he thinks he can do that,

Starting point is 03:02:52 and he rambles himself into corners where he makes himself look like a dishonest person. Because he is. But I just, you know, who told you to tell you that? Did he tell you that? The whole world saw that. So he's trying to downplay that he said that. Now I'm not going to tell you what I'm going to do.

Starting point is 03:03:06 It's like it's childish, is the right word for it. And GDD do politics says, this is like the time the press briefed him the next morning on the attempted drone attack on his birth. birthday. None of them know what's going on. Or he's lying because he's not in control. It's hard to say. But Israel attacks kill two in southern Lebanon despite ongoing Washington talks today. And that's not all that's happening. Too powerful earthquake shake Venezuela. Just saw the thing popping up right there. Lebanon, Israel, Israel Lebanon, so not Hezbollah. The Lebanon state, which is largely influenced by

Starting point is 03:03:45 Israel, the United States, discuss a pilot scheme to hand over territory. Look at that. So now we're talking about them taking territory, right? So now Israel and Lebanon is going to discuss handing over territory to Israel. You can't even make this up. This is the, this is exactly what everyone in Lebanon is screening about it. You're stealing our territory. You're occupying southern Lebanon.

Starting point is 03:04:08 You're murdering families. Hezbollah is trying to stop them. The government of Lebanon is seemingly controlled by Israel. and so, yeah, here, take more territory. It's just insane. And the main point, aside from that, is an Israeli drone strike on a car in southern Lebanon on Wednesday, killed at least two people, Lebanese security and medical sources told Reuters, despite the new ceasefire. And that's not even talking about the memorandum.

Starting point is 03:04:30 That's talking about the alleged ceasefire between Israel and Lebanon. And they still bomb in Lebanon, not even Hezbollah. I mean, guys, you can't be this blind. If you don't see what's happening, you're choosing to blind yourself to how obvious the situation is. These are monsters, and they'll do it right in front of you and then spit in your face and tell you it's raining. That's who these people are. Here, drop site news, Lebanon's health ministry said 19 more people have died over the last 24 hours. The wounds sustained in previous Israeli attacks, bringing the death toll since hostilities resumed in March 2nd to 4,211 killed 12,000 wounded.

Starting point is 03:05:08 You know, we've already gone through. The reality is that the UN has already broken down this in the beginning and just did it again about what they're doing in Gaza. this is the same tactic. They're using the same terms, the same outcomes, the same occupation. Everything's the same. They're just getting less coverage. Separately, a mother and her child reportedly survived in Israeli drone strike on their car, which I'm sure they'll probably try to get them again.

Starting point is 03:05:28 That's what they do. The health ministry also confirmed two people were killed in Wednesday in a separate drone attack on a different car. Israeli's military has claimed responsibility for the strike. These are civilians. To them, like we already showed you, for Gaza, they're just all monsters. in their mind every person in Lebanon is terrorists even though they pretend they're fighting for Lebanon just like they pretend they're fighting for Gaza and fighting for Palestinians and then went on to kill every Palestinian it's the same thing I know you can see it hopefully we can do something about it hopefully

Starting point is 03:05:59 but I'll leave it there guys for today thank you for tuning in it's important what we're doing what you're doing getting out there talking to people sharing this information there are more people awakening to this stuff than you could possibly understand that any of us could possibly understand. I mean, we're in some kind of weird, you know, technologically controlled bubble of information or algorithmically channeled areas, whatever it is. If you guys don't know, I've been having here with me

Starting point is 03:06:29 for moral support every day. It's important. But at the end of the day, guys, it is changing. And I know we all see that. So fight for it. I love you all. As always, question everything. Come to your own conclusion.

Starting point is 03:06:43 Stay vigilant.

The Last American Vagabond - UN Finds That Israel "Continues To Commit Genocide" By "Deliberately Targeted Palestinian Children"

There aren't comments yet for this episode. Click on any sentence in the transcript to leave a comment.