The Late Braking F1 Podcast - Norris signs with McLaren until 2025 - a bad call?
Episode Date: February 11, 2022The LB boys discuss the biggest concerns for each team as they head into a new era of F1, discuss the signing of Lando Norris at McLaren until 2025, and play the first round of F1: Back and Forth in 2...022. JOIN our Discord: https://discord.gg/dQJdu2SbAm SUPPORT our Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/latebraking TWEET us @LBraking SUBSCRIBE to our podcast! Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices
Transcript
Discussion (0)
This podcast is part of the Sports Social Podcast Network.
Thank you for listening to the Late Breaking F1 podcast.
Make sure to tune in for new episodes every Wednesday and Grand Prix Sunday.
And a very warm welcome to the late breaking F1 podcast presented by Harry Ead, Sam's age and me, Ben Hopping.
We're going to kick off.
We're going to go right forward this week.
None of this preamble because it's big stuff.
Harry, usually it's pizza Wednesday for Sam
and we're going to turn things completely on its head
because you're the one eating pizza this week.
I know, and it's National Pizza Day and everything
and Sam hasn't had a pizza.
What is going on?
But I have.
Well, I've had a taste of the pizza Wednesday life
and I like it.
It's very enjoyable.
You know what?
It's like life through a 50-50 at me
and I didn't know the answer, of course.
It's like,
Sam,
you can have a pizza
Wednesday,
yes or no,
and I went,
you know what,
I've had a lot
of pizza Wednesdays,
I'll have a week off,
I'll be good to my body,
no,
and then the world went,
incorrect,
it's National Pizza Day.
Out of all the Wednesdays
you should have had a pizza
today,
wrong again.
And then you had a cream egg?
I had a caramel
cream egg, folks.
You know,
for those that,
America,
I have been to you,
I have been in you,
your chocolate is appalling.
So,
sample some English chocolate
Come on, come on. It'll just taste
it tastes like actual sick in your mouth.
What's that about?
Hershey's fight me, I'm calling you out.
Come up.
Right, well, to all the non-Americans
that are still listening along, we do have
plenty of F1 to chat about this evening
to any Americans that are still watching,
thank you for bearing through Sam insulting
you every week.
Sam, you'll be glad to know there's no 50-50s
coming up for you at the end of today's show,
but there is F-1 back and four.
which makes its first appearance in 2022.
We're going to be discussing the Wii Races 1 gesture being removed for 2022.
Big thank you to Lando Norris and McLaren because they've decided to give us some news ahead of the podcast rather than afterwards.
So they are our favourite team of the week.
And we're going to be discussing sprint races because apparently that's what you want us to talk about.
So we're going to fulfill the people's wishes on that.
But we're going to start with what we believe should be the main.
concern for each of the 10 teams coming into this season.
So we'll start at the top of the grid, the team that won the Constructors
Championship last year.
We'll start with Mercedes.
Sam, what do you believe is the thing that they should be most concerned about heading
into 2022?
Now, I actually did some thinking before we started the podcast.
Nah, not having that.
No way.
It's happened.
When I don't have pizza, my brain works.
And initially I thought, well, the obvious one is George Russell.
isn't it? That's going to be the immediate worry. George Russell is the unknown here.
But actually, I think I'm going to flip your baby and reverse it on you.
On to the other side of the garage, I think the big worry has to be Lewis Hamilton.
What is the mentality? What is the mindset? What is the long-term focus? The goal of Lewis Hamilton in this sport in the car.
I feel like, yes, he's one of the greatest of all time. Many people believe he is the greatest of all time.
he is obviously fully committed to
winning
but is he going to throw a curveball this season
is it not going to go his way
is he going to be too aggressive
is he going to be single-minded
about wanting to get his own back
and I think that
that combined with the unknown
of what George Russell could achieve
could create a very turbulent mindset
and culture within Mesaegas this season
of course there is every chance
that Hamilton rocks up on day one
is as quick as always
and just gets the job done
and loves his Mesaagia's team
as he always has done
and supports George.
It helps him nurture and grow George,
not physically.
George is already tall enough,
but, you know, as a racing driver,
which is possible.
But I do think there is a real chance
that we could be going into an unknown.
And I've seen a lot of people say
the last time that Hamilton lost a championship,
you're going to be scared
because he came back
and he absolutely demolished him
for the next, whatever it was, three years.
So could it happen again?
Will he be that aggressive?
Or will he just switch off
and not what would be interested?
We don't know.
So actually I think it's the driver pairing
and what they could achieve that Mercedes need to be most careful, aware of,
because that car, it's Mercedes in a car, they cannot make a good car, that's got the problem.
It's what those drivers are going to achieve.
Yeah, I think it's a fair point because you have to consider that since Mercedes returned to Formula One,
this is only the third time that they've had a new lineup.
You think back to 2013 when Hamilton joined in the first instance,
2017 when Bottas joined, and now this is the third third instance.
with Russell coming on board. So it's not something they have to deal with very frequently. That's
very much true. I'm going to go with Red Bull next. And I think their biggest fear, I was initially
going to go in the direction of Sergio Perez here because naturally Max Verstappen won the driver's
championship last year, but the team did not win the Constructors' Championship. So there is
somewhat of a fear you would expect that Perez doesn't actually make that step forward and they're
stuck in the same position again. But I'm going to go in a different direction with this.
And I'm going to say their biggest concern is that they put too much into beating Mercedes in
2021, which I think is a realistic concern if you're that team.
Mercedes, have they played them a bit?
We know that Mercedes absolutely nailed the beginning of the regulations in 2014.
There's every chance that they've been planning to do exactly the same thing for this year.
Is it actually going to come out?
But they were willing to have a closer last season of the hybrid era,
the long-term game in mind where they're going to say, okay, we might sacrifice the
championship this year, but if it means we can get the next three or four, maybe we should
go ahead and do it. So, you know, are Ferrari and McLaren a threat, or other teams are threat?
We don't currently know, even if we think the instinct is no, we're not sure at this
point. So I think that's what they're probably most going to be afraid of. Red Bull were
very much clavouring for a championship versus Mercedes. They hadn't won one in.
it would have been eight years last year
so there's definitely pressure
from the powers that be
to go out there and win a title
whether that is drivers or constructors
so maybe they bow to that pressure
put too much energy into last year
and they're going to face the consequences of it
I'd at least be slightly concerned if I was
red bum or Matt
apart from
everything going wrong
what would you say is Ferrari's
thing to be afraid of Harry
I think the biggest thing to be afraid of
is the placement of the shell logo on their new merch
because it's in a red box while the rest of it around is black
and that gives me nightmares already.
It only came out this morning and it's given me a lot of concern already.
So I'm going to go with that.
Oh, wow, what an answer.
If it was any other team, I'd let you have that,
but there's too much to be worried about if you're Ferrari
so you can start again.
Start again.
No, fine.
I'll be serious this time.
I genuinely, I know we make jokes about Ferrari strategy,
but I think if they have got a car this year
that's capable of winning races,
dare we say, winning a championship,
I think the thing they've got to be worried about
is the pit wall, is the execution of a race on the pit wall,
because realistically, if you think the last time,
well, last time Ferrari were winning,
they were still making a few howlers in terms of strategy.
I think the last time you remember them
being that competent on a pit wall.
I don't know, late naughties,
maybe very early teenies, like 12, 2010.
It's a long time ago.
So if I was Charlotte Claire and Carla Science
and I get in that car and start testing,
and it's really good,
the first thing I start worrying about is,
oh, but how the pit wall gonna mess this up for us?
So, yeah, I think that's probably the thing
they need to be sharpest on.
I mean, that is assuming
that everything is going well elsewhere.
within the team with the car, etc.
But, you know, there's a realistic chance
for Ferrari could be back on the pace this year.
So, yeah, for me, I think it is the strategy,
the pit rule, the execution of a race
that should be Fezzar's big concern for 2022.
I mean, we actually decided before the podcast
who is going to take each team.
And I'd just like it noted how well I've done
to give up the responsibility of Ferrari
and put it onto someone else.
because as I'm sure you're aware, I could very easily have spoken a lot about Ferrari.
In fact, we probably wouldn't move on to the next team before we were 45 minutes into this episode.
So maybe it was a good thing I didn't take on Ferrari myself.
I mean, I wouldn't disagree with you whatsoever on that.
I would add potentially, I know the budget cap isn't new,
but with the amount that they have spent traditionally,
whether that's going to have a negative impact on them.
If you were going to pick one, Sam, what would you go for?
What for Ferrari?
Yeah.
Of course, a plethora of choices, isn't there?
I would probably agree literally with the two points that you gave, both of you, are exactly the points that I will pick out.
I think the one weakness they definitely don't have is their driver line-up.
As we said in the last week's episode, if you haven't gone and listen to that, go and listen to it.
We discuss who are best driver-line-up star of the season, who we think the strongest are.
A couple of us said Ferrari, and there's a reason for that.
That's where they are not struggling and they need to deliver on the car side of things.
They need to make sure they've got a consistent, reliable, well-performing car that meets the budget cap requirements.
No silly cheating allegations.
And they just get strategies to a normal level of success.
That's all you're aiming for, Ferrari, a normal level of success.
Oh, and knowing, of course, if you get overtaken, you won't win the race.
Oh, very good point. Very good point. Well made.
I guess we should also add another one on there, which is there is a fear.
possibly that COVID strikes again
and all the races have to take place at
Austria, in which case, Charles LeClaire
will be last in the championship.
It does not understand
physics when it comes to Austria.
There's only one race in Austria this year,
Charles, so you're better off.
Exactly. That's why they're
going to succeed this year.
We'll stick with you, Harry, on the next
one. Macca.
Daniel Ricardo,
I think, is their biggest concern for this year.
and I have a lot of faith in Ricky Bobby
and I think he will
as he did at Renault
I think he will come on strong
in his second year in McLaren
there are definitely glimpses of it
towards the end of the last year
but it's got to be
weighing on the back of their minds
you know we've probably spent a fair amount of money
getting this driver
and if he doesn't perform this year
then Maclare can maybe start weighing up their options again
so I think that's probably their biggest concern
because everything else at McLaren you'd argue
is going the right way.
They've got Orlando, who's shown a lot of promise already.
The team, the car, has been going upwards
ever since 2019, basically.
I know they didn't get third in the championship,
but they weren't far off it last year again.
So, yeah, I think the biggest one for them is going to be,
Daniel Ricardo.
I think it's going to become an unfounded worry,
but I think that's probably the thing they're thinking about the most.
Yeah, I'd say it's the logical one.
I don't think they have too much else to worry.
Obviously, Lando Norris is even less of a concern now
because he is very much committed to the team
with the news that came out today that he signed on for even longer.
So I think I would agree with you on that.
Just to, I don't know, play a few hypotheticals here.
If McLaren are in a good spot and Ricardo is much improved this year,
Sam, the relationship between Norris and Ricardo,
do you think that is of any concern whatsoever?
We could see, well, Norris came out, didn't he?
He said, you know, I like Danny Rick.
It seems like a really nice guy,
but I'm not going to have the same relationship with Daniel
that I had with Carlos and Carlos Seinfest said.
They were very much a jovial, bromance,
fiercest rivalry on the grid, thanking Netflix.
You know, there is already a difference in relationship between the two.
I think they're sensibly holding each other at arm's length.
But I also think that Daniel Rekano has history with drivers that are arguably tough to get along with on the grid.
You know, we've seen how we got along with Nax for staffing, someone that a lot of people, along the paddock have said,
he's blunt, he's for the point, and he gets his head down and gets racing, and that's what he cares about.
And actually, those two, for the most, but I've got a very positive relationship.
And I do think that McLaren are very loyal to Norris, so I don't think Norris were having anxiety issues there.
Daniel Ricago is coming up to the end of his career
In the autumn of his career
I would say last few years now to go
I think that the dynamic is so different
With those two drivers
That even if they were both in a championship fight
Long term
I do not think that relationship would become too afraid
I think they'll be able to keep it mature
And keep it together
They're both quite level-headed
I think they know what they're doing
So actually I think they could get quite heating
On the track if they want to
And I think at the end of the day
They'll be able to keep it together
I'll take on Alpine next
which again this is one way you could just pick out the team generally
that have had quite lofty ambitions for the last sort of five or six years
and they've never materialised and if they don't materialise now
are they ever going to so that's definitely a concern in its own right
but I do want to pick out specifically the power unit
because they are in a slightly more high risk, high reward scenario
where most other teams have at least one other teams
that use the same power unit as them.
Alpina are in a position where if their power unit delivers the goods,
they are the only ones that benefit from it, which is great,
but it works the other way as well,
in which if it doesn't work very well,
they're the ones that lose out.
And at least in recent time,
it's been more of the latter, not a lot of the primary.
So I don't think that there's going to be too much difference
between the power units.
They seem to be somewhat set now,
very balanced versus the beginning of the high,
hybrid era. But those power units are essentially stuck for the next five years. So if you're not in a
good spot now, you're probably not going to be in a good spot for quite a few years. And traditionally,
the Renault power unit has been a bit suspect. So I would at least be until a few races have gone this
year and you can actually see the results. I'd be a little bit on the edge of my seat about that.
Anything else you would offer up, Sam? I completely agree. The power unit is when I saw, I'm
the list that we were doing for each team of you had Alpine, my first thought for Alpin
was the power unit. We remember to the start of the hybrid era, the turbo hybrid era, just
how well Mercedes nailed the power unit. The fact that the front three or four running teams,
essentially, they were only there because they ran the Mercedes power unit. The advantage
that a strong power unit can give you is meteoric. So if Alpina, they only seem to run that
Renault power unit, of course they are a Renault brand, and they absolutely nail it for the final
development for the next four or five years, they can have a 10, 15% advantage over the grid
for the next half a decade. It is absolutely crucial that they can step up because I would say
that they are the weakest of the power units on the grid currently, not by a long shot,
not by, you know, by a couple of miles an hour, but it is enough to make a difference over several
seasons when you've got other developments going on. So I completely agree. They need to
nail the power unit. We'll move on to Al-Fatari next, Sam. What we've got for them?
Alpha Tauri
I mean it's got to be
Resident Hall of Fame
a little Yuki Sankoda isn't it?
Pierre Gazley is
he's gonna deliver I think
I think Pierre Gassley is now a safe pair of hands
The man is Rapido
The Gasman
I think the only concern of Gassley is
Does he stay at the end of this year
Or does a seat open up for him that he can go elsewhere
That's the big concern there
But you know for this season at least
Gassie's gonna do the job
The issue he here is
Yuki Sanoda
Now the cars and the tyres
As I said previously
are way more similar to the F2 cars.
You've got the 18-inch tyres now.
The cars are more aerophocused on the bottom
and the body of the car
rather than the sidepox
and pushing the air at the top,
which is very F2 related.
And I think that benefits the likes of Guan Yu-Zhao,
Mick Schumacher, Mazapin, and Yuki-Sanoda.
Now, if Yuki-Sanoda can feel confident,
if he can carry the end-of-season confidence
that he had from the 2021 season into 2022,
he could deliver.
If not, and Al-Avateri have a competitive car,
I think this could be the end of his Formula One career
if he does not get it together this season.
It could be game over,
and Alfa Tari can find themselves with points
only in one half of the garage,
meaning that they're not scoring a lot of points,
they're not high up the table,
that money coming in is minimal,
and they are struggling for the season.
So it could be a tough year,
but I'm hoping the little Yuki,
he is a Hall of Famer,
so you've got to have a little love for him.
I hope that he gets it together.
Hall of Famer, Yuki Sonoda, what a guy.
I wouldn't disagree with what you've said there.
I'm going to add one more possible concern
into the mix, which is, we know that Alpine have been directed towards these new regulations for a long
time. We know Aston Martin are very much doing the same thing. We know that McLaren are doing the same thing.
Williams and Hass basically gave up on the last era in favour of the new one coming in.
Harry, do you think there's a concern that all of those teams looking to 2022, they might just jump
ahead of Alvatari? Yeah, I mean, I think there's always a genuine concern.
for any of these teams to be honest
because they may be working on it for a while
but they might have got it wrong
and then you really look at BMW
I think it was back at the 09 regs
they worked on that car for ages
and then it was terrible
so yeah look for Alvatari
that's a definite
definite risk and something they
they're right to be concerned about
in the same way that I think Red Bull should be
concerned about like you said Ben
so um
Yeah, it's going to be interesting.
We'll have to see.
But I hope a little Yukiah Hall of Famer steps up.
Otherwise, we'll boot him out.
Forget him a school.
Wait, he's the only Hall of Fame representation we have on the grid,
so he's got to perform.
There's no question, he's got to do it.
Has my fire alarm not made the cut?
Yeah.
Has he got a drive this year?
Didn't get a drive.
Him and Piastri, the biggest snubs of 2022.
Yeah, I agree.
Aston Martin, Sam.
I've been going a bit of a different direction
to what we've been speaking about
to some of the other teams
and that is the topic of leadership
with Ashton Martin.
Obviously they've removed Ottmar
who I think skedied the helm
he's been there a long time
he's been a stalwart of that team
throughout all its guises
that it's occupying over the last few years
and then, you know,
Papa Stroll, Father Christmas Stroll
has come in and shaken the money tree around
a little bit and then we wants to turn Ashton Martin
around, you know, both their actual
car production has been
not perfect over the last few years
and their sporting production in terms of Formula One
hasn't got off to the best start
so by removing Ombar it was an interesting choice
and then they had the likes of Martin Whitmarsh
they bought Mike Crackin
I try and got to laugh at how are you
thought it got me to bring this up
I really tried to be serious
yeah they brought Mike Crackin
and then you've also got the leadership
on track of Sebastian Vettel
who there's no guarantee that he sticks around for years to come.
So I feel like if they haven't nailed the winter break,
they haven't nailed preseason,
the development hasn't gone the right direction
due to this lack of understanding.
Obviously, Mike Crack hasn't got the Formula One history either, right?
He was obviously BMW Motorsports leader at that point.
He's not a veteran of Formula One.
That could be difficult for him.
I just feel like they need to have come together and sorging it out.
Otherwise, it could be a very, very troublesome.
some start to the season. If Sebastian Bettsen isn't fully focused, Martin Whitmarsh is only
working on one area, and that hasn't necessarily on to plan. Mike is still finding his feet,
and Lawrence is all about the big business. So I do feel like if they haven't got a proper
focus on this, they could really miss out for the next season or so. I think, sort of related
to your point, I think I would say just they can't lose their identity of what's got them to
where they are. Like they can't, obviously this is going back pre-asked the mind, but
They were so efficient as a team.
They were able to make the most out of nothing.
They can't lose that even as they expand,
but remains to be seen.
I'll go with Williams, and very simply put,
I'll say it's the driver lineup that is a bit of a concern
because Nicholas Latifie is one of the weaker drivers on the grid.
I don't think there's any doubt about that.
And George Russell's a massive loss,
and the question is,
how much of George Russell's talent is going to be replaced by Alex Albin. All of it? No,
absolutely not. Part of it, maybe. It's a bit of a question as to whether Albin goes down the
Danny Caviat route or whether he goes down the Pierre Gazley route in that they were all dropped
from the Red Bull program. Pierre Gasly goes back to Toro Rosso and then Alfatari and he's
flourished ever since and he's done a great job. He could do that and he could be great for Williams.
Alternatively, he might have lost all his confidence like Viat did
and it might not work out whatsoever,
in which case an Albin and Latifi lineup
doesn't inspire a great deal of confidence.
So I think it remains to be seen whether...
It's probably more on Albon than it is on Latifi
because we kind of know what Latifi is at this point
and I don't think you can expect more from him than what we've seen.
But with Albin, I think it's more of a question mark
given that one year out that he's had.
I think Latifi's got...
nothing to lose. I think it's a wing-wing situation. Latifi either delivers what he did last
season and people go, that's what you expect from Latifi. And what Latifi delivered last season
wasn't bad. It was just, I think he was outshone by George Rosser as you'd expect. But Latifi
just needs to deliver Latifi. You're right, Albon, this could be career defining in terms of
whether he's able to progress up the grid or he just becomes a back of the market, Williams
driver that people go, will drop him when the next available thing comes along. That'll be a shame.
Alpha Romeo, Harry.
I think their business concern is an out-of-form Vouchy Botas.
I don't think it's going to happen.
I think this is going to be a really good thing for Botas too.
Finally, not have to be Lewis Hamilton's teammate anymore.
I think it's going to be not the making of,
but it is going to do him the world of good.
but I think that I would be concerned still heading into the year
that after several years of being the number two to Lewis Hamilton
is Bottas's motivation still there?
And if it isn't, then they're in a not great position
because they've got a rookie and then they've got an out-of-form finish driver,
which isn't a great lineup in that sense.
So yeah, I think that's the thing that I'd be worried about the most.
Like I say, I don't think it's going to happen.
similar story with the McLean Ricardo concerned to be honest but it's a possibility.
I agree with you. I'd go slightly more specific on it and I'd say Bottas is overtaking.
It's got to come back to where it was in the Williams days because we saw it constantly.
I didn't see it constantly. That's almost the problem in itself. We saw it whenever he needed to
in Mercedes when he started lower down the grid or in any of that sort of format. He wasn't able to
get through the field as quickly as say
at Hamilton or Vastappen was able to. It wasn't
clinical enough with those moves.
He could kind of get away with it at Mercedes
because he only needed to do it once every 10
races. He's going to need to do it almost
every race you'd imagine at Alpha Romeo.
So it's a bit of a
question about whether we can get back to that.
I think I'll go in a slightly different direction
actually and I'm a little bit disappointed
that they haven't released
Alpha and May and A's yet.
That's a concern.
For you?
That's a different direction.
Is it a concern for the team that they're not going to launch it?
Think of the revenue that they could bring in with Alpha Romeo games.
Are you saying that they're sitting around like, oh my goodness me,
the shareholders are going to be so annoyed because we haven't launched it this year.
Yes.
Yes, think of it next to Himes.
Alpha Romeo have been a sponsor of, let's call it Salba, since 2018.
And you've only now made the Alpha Rao.
a mayonnaise joke.
I'll be saving it, you know.
What are you doing?
Don't take any glasses off, he's swimming.
All I'll say is,
I don't think Helmonds
are quaking in their boots.
Hey, they can be the fastest mayo
in the West.
Why is that a tough?
What are you want?
The fastest Mayangays.
On the shelf.
Come on.
All right.
Last team.
Which is half?
Apart from the concern that they turn up this season after not doing anything last year and they're slower
What are the concern with you have if your has?
For variation, I'm going to avoid the generally slow and obvious point.
I'm going to go down the route of public relations with Haas
Haas are obviously in a controversial position.
They are being sponsored by a clearly Russian-focused
sponsor. Obviously Russia
are going through some interesting times in the
political world
and one of their drivers
also hasn't fallen under the best
flight. I'm getting a Mazepin there because I
don't want she-macca to come under any speculation.
I wasn't sure you meant, so thank you for clarifying.
I'm glad I'm glad I cleared it up.
And I think that
those two situations combined with
possibly being stuck at the back of the grid
again and you know it is
definitely possible. I think
that lack, that combination
of negatives can cause a real ripple of negative public relations,
which causes fans to turn, fans to lose interest,
and then because of that, I feel like your sponsorship slowly slips away.
And if you're only left with one sponsor, Earl Carly,
which is obviously related to Mazurping,
and Mazurik doesn't want to be there anymore maybe because of how poor the team is,
Haas could find themselves in an incredibly difficult position financially,
which we already saw that Gene Haast wasn't swimming in cash
when it came to Formula One investment
previously to this season.
So I feel like they need to make some advances on the grid
and they need to make sure that their public relations
to Formula One fans and relative sponsors
and possible sponsors is as positive as it can be.
I think otherwise in the long term, financially,
they could find themselves in trouble.
With that, we'll move on to our next topic,
which is join the Discord server
because you get some sort of choice here.
We offer up every week a couple of different choices as to what a topic should be.
And whatever the winner of the poll is, we go ahead with it.
And this week, one of the options was to discuss sprint races and how it doesn't look like
we're going to get six anymore.
And instead, we might well be stuck with three, which is the same amount we had last year.
And that was the one that won.
So clearly people don't care about my blood pressure and they don't care about my health.
And they want me to talk about sprint races.
so I appreciate it, people in the Discord.
Sam, are you surprised that it seems likely,
it's not confirmed, seems likely we're only going to get three
when the plan was going to be six?
Harry, I was going out of the start of this segment.
Should we just turn our mics off and let Ben go at it?
I thought, I was going to say, same to you honest,
thought it was only fair.
I mean, Ben, I know you've asked a good question,
but do you want to just get it out?
Let the people have it?
All right.
Good, I'll mute up.
I'm going to go and get a coffee.
All right.
See, man.
Yeah, yeah, cheers.
Shockingly, I'm not actually going to go massively after sprint races here because I've done it so many times before.
And as I've said, my blood pressure cannot take it.
I will die recording, which is not okay.
So am I answering my own question here?
Am I surprised about this?
It looks as if, from my perspective, and this almost relates back to,
some comments that Zach Brown made in January.
It very much seems like the top teams here are trying to force the hand of F1.
Because what they are essentially trying to...
I think the analogy I used when we first discussed this was that you're essentially
walking into a bar.
You're either 18 in the UK or you're 21 in the US.
You've just turned that age where you can drink.
But all your friends aren't old enough yet.
So you go up to the bar.
This is sprint races walking up to the bar, asking for six.
six beers and the bartender looking in like well are they all for you you're not going to share
them with your friends and you've got aerodynamics and engine in the back going oh yeah we're going
our drinks essentially all of that analogy is to say that the big teams want more money in all for the
budget cap they want more of a budget cap in order to pay for these additional three sprint races
when in fact they don't need that money and instead they'll pour it into other resources
And it's like, are you sure you're going to pour it into sprint races?
No, they won't.
I understand that with six races rather than three,
there is a slight increase in the chance that you might come into some damage.
We didn't actually have much of it in the three races last year,
but there is more of a chance of that.
The big teams are essentially saying,
we need more money in order to do this,
but are just doing so that they can actually outspend some of the others,
which is what we want to avoid.
And I can't, I believe that's happening because I can't understand any other reason why they wouldn't want six sprint races.
Now, my opinion is that sprint races are goddamn awful.
If you haven't been paying attention, that's my opinion.
I've been sheltering it pretty well to this point.
But, and this is mad, this is truly crazy.
F1 don't really care what I think.
So my opinion doesn't mean much to them.
And they think sprint races are great.
And that's all that matters to them.
They think sprint races are great.
Fans generally aren't quite as opposed as I am to them.
And in terms of pure financials, it's a success.
More time on track, more competitive action on track versus practice time is good for ratings, good for sponsors.
So basically what I'm trying to say is there is no reason that F1,
going to do, are going to try and get rid of these three sprint races other than the potential that
these three teams are trying to leverage them. So do I agree with what those big teams are trying to
do here? Absolutely not. I think it's a ridiculous rationale. Do I care that that's the way that
we would get less sprint race action this year? I don't care whatsoever any means necessary as my
approach to less sprint race action.
And now Sam, I will let you answer the initial question I post.
God, there's Bernie Hocking over there.
Any means necessary?
The thing is for sprint races is they're a complete gimmick.
And I think you're right, Ben, that they allow for increased exposure.
When you're at the track, it is more interesting to watch an extra third of a race than it is to watch a practice session.
And there are positives.
I'm not going to sit here and act like every single check in the box as a negative.
There are some positives.
You see, you know, Brazil, for example,
we saw Hamilton have an absolute delta.
It was a really fun thing to watch.
It was a great weekend.
I'm not going to lie, there are some positives.
But it frustrates me that certain racetracks seem to be given extra priority over others.
Why, what decides whether you get a sprint race or not?
If we're going to have sprint races,
then the format of Formula One should be changed.
And every race should just have a sprint race.
and that should be the weekend that we now accept and go with.
And in that case, I don't mind if every single team has a budget allotment
to encounter the much larger amount of miles that they are going to have to endure.
And their engines would endure and they will end up struggling with wear
and damage and reliability issues.
That will be fine because that will be part of an every single weekend package
that Gagos becomes Formula One.
The issue is six races is clearly a gimmick to ensure,
a bit more TV time to bring some people in,
and I think to sell a few more tickets at a race weekend.
Three sprint races in the first season as a trial,
I guess it makes sense, okay, as a trial,
but just to have three every single season,
it just feels irrelevant, it feels pointless,
it feels unnecessary, it feels like we're chucking stuff in
because we can't really admit that it's failing
and take it all the way,
but also we don't want to give in to those Formula One teams
that are desperately asking for a little bit more money and look weak.
So I feel like Formula One, as a management,
group have caught themselves between a rock and a hard place.
We either give it to the peer pressure of the F1 teams and give them what they want,
which they're trying not to do anymore,
or we give it to the peer pressure of the fans and take everything away and concede that we've lost.
So three just feels like a really awkward middle ground that doesn't achieve anything.
Am I surprised that they're at three?
No, this is the kind of decision that I think we've come to expect from the Formula One management group.
this weird compromise
it doesn't make a lot of sense
it's okay to trial something
for it to not work
and I agree with being in the sense of
if teams
asking for more money is the reason that we
lose all sprint races
they don't for it I roll they stick to that budget cap
and we go back to a Formula 1
way of doing things
that works normal qualifying is a spectacle
I love qualifying
I get as excited for qualifying as I do for the race
and theoretically with the new downforce
rules the racing should be very
exciting and I would just like to see 20 races with the new rules and it'd be exciting but if it
can go out sprint races I should all have sprint races and I feel like it's got to be awning or not at all so
I'm not surprised at the realist position I think it's a little bit cowardly a formula management to not
make it just a concrete one way or the other it's a little bit sad and I fully agree with what
Zach Brown is saying that seems we're trying to once again leverage their position politically to
go more out of it that's my stake on it go more sprint races amen sir
not that I'm one way or the other of what you said.
Harry, what do you think?
Is this a surprise that it looks like it will be three rather than the six that was initially pitched?
No, and I don't really have much more to add than what Sam just said.
It's just a result of the steaming part of monkey doo-doo that formal and one of the management have got themselves into.
And being lobbied by teams again, we said this the other week.
so yeah no I'm not surprised
and like Samson is it's like
a halfway house of
while we still
you know it was still a success in their book
even though it wasn't because they sucked
but it's to success success in F1's book
the sprint races last year
so we've got to at least keep three of them
but we can't have all the ones we wanted
because F1 teams are asking for more money for it
which we can't do because we've got a cost cap so
yeah just rubbish
To be honest, and obviously we don't want people to be hurting crashes,
but I wish a few more cars had crashed out of the sprint races last year,
because I think we would be down to zero by now,
because I think they'd have a turnaround and gone,
we can't keep doing this every weekend, our cars keep crashing out,
and then the F1 team sort of lobbied,
even though I hate that,
they were lobbied the F1 management to have none
because they kept crashing out last year.
But unfortunately, it was only like Pierre Gansley,
who lost his front wing,
and that was by it in the sprint races last.
year so never mind but um yeah in short not surprised disappointed but we're halfway halfway there to none
i guess down from six so it's an improvement and it's not going to be at the first race which it was
planned to so also an improvement i mean i it does very much seem like we are almost asking the
fia to make a decision that benefits the show um but doesn't benefit their pockets their pockets
which based on experience i'm a bit doubtful um overall the you're asking the fia or f1
management because well people also have all right very true all of them no it's um yeah it does feel like
because they have been a financial success it's just that hasn't exactly replicated in terms of the
in terms of the action so they're they're almost competing with one another at the moment the finances the financial
of it versus the show's side of it and I think I know which one will win if it's left to
to F of him it was the it's the same with the with the races Saudi I think as members of what we said
this after after that one it's yeah you get Muppets like us talking about it and and it was
chaotic and but that's now kind of the measure of of a thing that's good
which isn't the case we are the problem we are we are I mean this is a news god damn it this
It really isn't news.
So we've basically started on sprint races and concluded with we're at full.
Great.
That is so late breaking.
So late.
Great conclusion.
Let's leave that there.
Then let's move on.
Again, a massive thank you to both Landon Norris and to McLaren, who are our favorite driver
and week, a favorite driver and team respectively this week because, you know, they gave us news prior
to podcast recording.
because with our British buyers that's not why they're favourites as much as we tried to hide it
it is because Brexit back again it's because they gave us news like yes to dober in a timely fashion
yeah you know me he's extended his deal until 2025 do you think this was a good move from both
the team and from Landon Norris's perspective harry um I was a bit confused when I saw this news
before this morning because I swear last year he signed a multi-year contract
then but anyway i think he was doing until 2024 and i think he's extended by a year
extended again basically so he's added a year to what it was so i think he's put a conservatory on it
yeah he's basically put a conservatory on his f1d or fancy
good stuff um yeah so i think we've we covered this when he extended the first time
um and it and it was it's a good move from mcclaren and
And, you know, if it's rumors are to be believed,
I think Red Bull, well, Mercedes and more specifically Red Bull,
were really sniffing around Lando Norris, like a persistent dog,
trying to get him to sign for either when Lewis Hilton leaves
or as a replacement for Sergio Perez, I'm assuming.
So from McLaren's point of view, this is another win-win
because they've signed their arguably Star Man,
for even longer than they had him already signed for already.
So, yeah, good move for McLaren.
From Landers' point of view, again, I think we said this at the time.
I think it's a risky move.
And who's to say McLaren won't come good in this new era, Formula One?
They may turn up this year with an absolute rocket ship.
But to sign again, he signed once, and now he signed again,
before actually turning a wheel in these new cars.
It's a bold call, to be honest,
because it might not leave his options open.
I mean, we don't know specifics of exit clauses,
and if his management are sensible, then he's got some.
But, yeah, it's definitely bold.
And I guess that's kind of also the counterpoint.
That's the point of it.
It's a sign of intent from both parties.
But who wins out of this and the most?
I'd say it definitely McLaren.
Yeah, I think McLaren have pulled a blinder here,
and they should be patting themselves on the back,
because it really is a no-brainer. Norris is super talented, as we know. We know that Lando Norris
has had interest from other teams, even though he can't be poached for, well, maybe he could be
poached, but his contract isn't up for a few years. So he's had interest from other teams.
And we know that it's easier to pay a guy that's never won a race versus someone who's won quite a few or won a
championship. The fact that they are paying for that 2025 year now is going to help them out in the
long run financially. Even though we know Norris is talented, he hasn't got the accolades to back
that up yet. And I think it will come if McLaren give him a good car. So essentially you're asking
McLaren, do you either pay for 2025 now when you are paying for a guy that's never won a race,
or do you pay for him in a few years time where he might have already won a championship, he might have
won multiple races. He's not going to come as cheap. So I think from McLaren's perspective,
yeah, they've absolutely nailed this and they don't even need to prove their car. They don't
need to prove their worth this year in order to get that deal done. So from Lando's perspective,
it shows how committed he is to the team. It shows how much faith he has got. And I understand
that in most instances, you know, there are only 20 drivers on the grid and it's very difficult to get
any seat in F1, let alone a seat that is, we believe, pretty good. So you don't want to,
you know, if you're given the opportunity to extend that, you in most instances want to grab
hold of that opportunity as quick as you can. I think Wulando Norris's perspective, though,
he's actually talented enough that he didn't need to do so. So I'm a bit surprised from his
perspective, but McLaren have nailed this. What do you think, Sam? I completely agree with you
on the McLaren front. It's an absolute genius move. Zach Brown is an absolute master marketing.
tier and you know I will see it from the response as they brought on the side of that car
is such an appealing brand and I think Landau has quite rightly been drawn into it they've created
a culture that fits around him very well it's suiting all of his characteristics we know that
behind the camera he is quite a reserved person he's a little bit camera shy he's quite introverted
he cares a lot about his mental health which is you know a fantastic thing to see from a modern
day driver and I think McClaher understand that and my lovely mum always did say
it matters more about the people you work with
rather than what it is that you're doing in work.
And so if Landon Norris is the option to go to St.
McLaren with a group of people that he adores working with
and he feels comfortable with
and that gets the best result out of him
and he commits to that for an extra year
or he goes to Red Bull, which is, you know,
there are a lot of people talking
and saying that it's a toxic place
and second drivers don't do well
and you'll always play second field to Verstappen.
Does he want that atmosphere?
Does he want to go through that?
Maybe he's spoken to Daniel Ricardo,
and he's gone,
mate, if you don't want to go into that very competitive team internally,
it's not for you.
So he might just be more comfortable,
McLaren.
You know what?
If that's what he's basically decision on,
brilliant for him.
Great decision.
But, you know, Harry said it,
and I completely agree.
I hope that his management have been clever.
I hope they've entered a lot of clauses into it.
I'm sure they have.
For example, race swings or championships
increase a big pay boost.
And finishing below a certain level,
allows him to go and look for another deal should get a rise he is a one of those generational
talents on the grid there are only a couple of them and i think if a big team move came available
he would be an immediate target for them and they kept the money i imagine to buy him out so it's
risky i think from lando gorse's point of view in terms of championship slash race wings points of
view but culture and having a drive and being competitive my car is one of the biggest games
in motorsport not just formula one he's going to be comfortable he's going to be comfortable he's
going to be there for a while.
I think in terms of securing yourself a future
and a place to build from,
it's sensible.
It's sensible.
But yeah, it's risky
when you haven't turned your bloody wheel
in the car,
but genius move from McLaren.
Shout out to Mrs. Sage, by the way.
Yeah.
Go on, Jackie.
Go on, Jackie.
Yeah.
Wise words.
We'll move on to the We Race as One gesture
and the evolution of that
as we go into 2022.
So as we understand it right now,
the Wii race as one video package that we get at the beginning of before every race that will remain that will remain in place however when the drivers have the opportunity to show their gesture which is essentially those who kneel and don't kneel it looks as if that is going to disappear this year so Sam what are your thoughts on this?
Firstly the gesture itself the initial gesture
was, I think, a good idea.
It was nice to see all the drivers do something in unison
to stand up for a cause that's very important.
Of course, Formula One themselves have signed on
with the Lewis Hamilton Foundation
to become a direct partner with,
as of Sky Sports, to become a direct partner with that foundation
to try and help children from a minority,
a group of minority, you know,
whether it be people of colour,
or whether it be female drivers
or those are the LGBTQ Plus.
community to be able to come into the sport and have a successful career in the sport.
I think that's brilliant.
And I think the Wii Races won was meant to be a public showing from the 20 most influential
people in motorsport, basically to show that they're also committed to that.
Unfortunately, I think it became very much about race and media-driven allowed it to be
Lewis Hamilton and Shums against those who necessarily didn't want to go the extra hog and
take a meal.
Because of that, it divided the grid.
and also it made it look like an absolute fast.
It was a joke.
You know, we have this little speech at the start in black and white for even more drama,
and the likes of Kimmy Reichen and Mazepin and Carlos Sites would have literally one word
when they put together the Wii Racers One area out of a whole two-minute VT,
and then you cut to the grid, and only some of them will be standing,
and some of them will be kneeling, and it just looks so ironic that it's so far from Wii Races 1,
It's clearly we race as individuals and we stand up entirely for what we want,
and that is, you know, a bit hit and miss.
So the fact it's gone, I think, removes a controversial talking point from Formula One,
and I think that's positive.
The fact that it is gone, on the other hand, is a real shame.
It's a real, real shame, and it's a real miss from Formula One,
because they are the pinnacle of motorsport, whether you agree with that thought process or not.
They are what most drivers want to achieve.
and the fact that they're no longer having a public display,
there elevates people of colour, women, LGBTQ plus members,
you know, is atrocious.
It's a shame because it is very conflicting with the message
that they are trying to then send off for others to join in the sport
and to be aware of other societies.
So once again, Formula One management are making a farce of something,
they're not committing to something,
and those other drivers that are trying to represent certain areas of it
have made it very difficult to show that the drivers are all a part of unison.
So, yeah, the only positive out of this is we go longer get to laugh at those people who clearly aren't conforming to the message that is trying to be sent out by Formula 1.
Other than that, it's a real shame.
Yeah, I don't think it's a great look.
In 2020, we had very anti-racism shows of gesture.
That evolved into we race as one last year and now it's completely disappeared this year.
It does feel like the message was, you know,
we'll give our two years' worth of messages to show unity.
Because obviously this came about largely because of what happened to George Floyd.
And it does feel like, at least from F1's perspective,
enough time has lapsed now that we don't need to do anything anymore,
which I think is a ridiculous notion.
Because ultimately those, you know, the values,
the words, what it means, it shouldn't change, regardless of whether it's one day after such
an horrific event or if it's one day before the next one, you should still stand by your values
regardless. So I don't think it's a great look for them. I kind of agree with you, Sam, in that
on the one hand, I'm not gutted that it's going because I think the words are so meaningless
from F1's perspective, that actually the gesture becomes meaningless.
And I don't mean that on the part of the drivers even.
I just think from F1's point of view,
that there was the words meant nothing.
And I don't think the gesture means anything as a result of that.
So that's very specifically talking about the opportunity to kneel or do whatever,
not anyone did anything different other than Neil or not Neil,
but the opportunity was there.
You know, that's gone and that's very specifically looking at that.
In terms of like the video, which we think is going to stay,
I'm going to pitch something here because I thought last year's message was awful.
I just thought it was massively diluted to the point where it didn't mean anything.
It was almost became a game of how many buzzwords can you get into 90 seconds of VT,
which I don't think is useful for anything.
at least in 2020 when it was very much more directed towards racism like there was there was one issue
one core issue that they were focused in on last year it just felt like what can we race as one
and the words that came out as a as a result of that vt i just i just didn't feel anything from them
i'll pitch this what i think should happen with that video spot i think every driver should have
the opportunity to have one race in the year where they get ownership of that space and they can
essentially do what they like with it they can focus on racism if they want to they can focus on
under-representation of women in motorsport or sexual orientation it doesn't matter what it is
but they get their block in sort of one race of the year they can do it as whatever they want
really they can do a talking head they can get other members of their team involved if they feel like
is going to generate their message.
And I think at that point, because they can focus in on what's important to them,
the words start to mean something a bit more and it is very personal.
And I think it would do a better job of getting it across than what we've got at the moment.
I think it is the prerogative of the driver.
If they don't want to do it, that's fine.
And I think if they don't do it, they should be judged accordingly.
But they are at least afforded the opportunity to do that in that spot that exists.
at the moment.
I feel like those words would carry more meaning
and they'd be able to do something a bit more personal to them.
Harry, first of all,
what your thoughts on that idea is,
but also more generally speaking,
what's your thoughts on what's going on in?
Yeah, I mean,
hadn't even considered that sort of idea
of doing one driver per race,
but I think it makes complete sense.
And like you say,
it stops the scripted, meaningless buzzword
bingo that we have or we had last year.
From the wider question,
yeah, I'm largely aligned with what you have both said, basically.
It's a real shame that it's going,
but at the same time, I'd rather it not be there anymore anyway
because, like you say, it's not contributing anything anymore.
And I think when they started it,
at least there was you know
the intention was there
but I think as it's gone on
like we've said it's just
trying to make the gesture for the sake
in making the gesture and I'd rather they
didn't have it and did something
practical and meaningful with
their time I know it's right before
a race and they don't want to do it then but I'd rather
they did actual practical things and spoke about that
and whether that's put through the VT
or whether it's done through other means
through social media through whatever
I'd rather they did that than the half the grid, not united with the other half of the grid by not kneeling.
And it's just always been a mess.
Even since when it started back in 2020, it's just not been, it was never dealt with properly.
So, yeah, I think the fact that it's going is as much a shame as it is a good thing in my book,
because yeah I'd rather they did something with it something meaningful with it
than have half the grid kneading down.
Okay.
With that, we're going to move on because Sam,
you are in need of a first quiz win of the year.
And the question is, will F1 back and forth give you that win or not?
It's F1 back and forth's first appearance of 2022.
It's time to see if Sam can win.
Oh dear.
F1.
Back and forth, it's F1.
Back and forth, it goes backwards.
Then goes forth, it's F1.
Back and forth.
F1.
Can the questions just be whether it goes backwards or fourth, please?
No, because that's a 50-50,
and you absolutely won't get them right.
It's so true
Who knows
Maybe this is your week
F1 back and forth
Obviously one we've done plenty of times before
But we've got new listeners coming in all the time
And thank you very much for listening to us
And getting this far in the episode of course
F1 back and forth is a game we play
Where Harry versus Sam
I will give them a category
And there are a number of correct answers
Within that category
They'll go back and forth
with answers until one of them can't think of anything or gives an incorrect answer.
So today's category, we're going to go all the way back to 2004.
2004 was the first year that the Bahrain Grand Prix existed.
And we know that obviously it's the first race of the season coming up in about a month,
about two months time.
2004 Bahrain Grand Prix starters.
There are 20 correct answers.
answers. Sam, I'll let you go first on this one.
Okay.
First pick. First pick. Well, all right. Harry, you'll like this. We'll start the top.
What? What's the category?
2004 barangre Grand Prix starters.
Oh, right. Sorry, oh, four. Right, go. Sorry, Sam. Yes.
Right. I'll do you a favor, Harry. We'll do it in all the like you like it. I'll try my best to keep you all if possible.
start at the top
Michael Schumacher
Michael Schumacher
was there
at the 2004
and it's over
folks
Oh it's over
already
ever
you'd be surprised
to know you're right
Sam
Michael Schumacher did race
Yeah
come on
Harry
are you going for
Rubens Barichello
if Michael Schumacher
was there
you know Rubens was there
as well
they're one of them
They've got to go together
so yeah
Barrow
was there. Sam.
Now, Harry, unfortunately, this is where my knowledge of the
finishing order ends, so I'm now just going to say names
like I think were there. Fernando Alonso.
Fernando Alonzo was there. You are correct in that you have abandoned
that approach, but you're right, so it doesn't matter.
Harry, Senor Chunky.
Senor Chunky.
one Pablo Montoya, as most would call him, is a correct answer.
Sam.
Jensen, don't we in my seat button?
It was a good year for Jensen Button 2004.
And he's a correct answer here.
Harry.
Choochoo is Yarno Trilly.
Yarno Trilly was there.
as per usual he was outshadowing his teammate Fernando Alonzo
good job Yarno
have you got it in qualifying order there
I've got it in race finish order
alright fine did he beat him
did Yano beat Alonzo
yeah I think Alonzo might retired
from that Grand Prix possibly
absolutely washed
but yeah
so Yano Trin is correct
Sam
Um
The Crimson
chin
David Cautard
Wow
What a name
DC is correct though
He was there
Harry
Still going folks
Um
Ralphie Malfi
Ralph Schumacher
Ralphie the Malfi
Of course
Ralph Schumacher was there
Yes that's a correct
answer
Sam back to you
Takuma tomato Sato
Takuma tomato Sato
is technically
incorrect answer but I'll take
Takuma Sato as your answer there
which is a correct answer
Yay thanks
Good stuff
Going back to you Harry
Kimmy
Kimmy
was there
I think that also ended in retirement for him
That's 10
So you're halfway there, guys.
Well, that.
I'd like to say you've probably got the easier half out of the way of, but what up?
Good.
What no?
Back to you, Sam.
I've got a couple games in mind, so that's good.
Man who sits under a tree, Nick Heidefeld.
It was a race.
It was in the 2000s.
Nick Heidefeld was there.
Come on, Nick.
Harry, back to you.
um
Felipe Masa
Felipe baby
he was there indeed
not quite in that Ferrari yet
but he was getting ready for it
Sam next one
man who defends this thinger
Jean-Carlo Fisichella
come on Fizzy
yeah he was there
this is good stuff
Um, seven to go, Harry.
Everyone's favourite Australian, Mark Weber.
Mark Weber was there. Well done.
I think at this point, this is where we start to get a little bit trickier.
Six left. It's all to play for, Sam.
The man with a mildly gnaughty name, Olivier Pannis.
Was he about? I believe he was.
That's not mildly naughty.
that is absolutely not in any way
Olivier Pannis though is a correct answer
in his Toyota days
We're still going
Hurry
5 left
Who was Panis's teammate
I can't remember what team he was driving for
I just remember his game
Was it Toy Boathe?
Oh it wasn't even Ralphie at that point
Ralph's in a Williams
I haven't fired him yet
Demata
Cristiano de Matta was indeed
Panis's teammate
What's de Maga with you
Right
That's 16 out of 20 names
All done
And there's four more to go
Sam
Are they all in two teams
They are not
That's a shame
So how many drivers have we got left?
Four
Oh
poop
there's only one
that I can
confidently think of
it's gonna be wrong
now I've said that
was Christian
Clean kicking him out
Clean was still kicking him out
yeah I say he was still kicking about
he was still kicking about
he was young at that point
but yes he was there
so that does just leave
three names
Harry can you pluck any of them out of thin air
is one
Mr Bumgardner
it was in this
well
Again, no, but close enough.
Yeah, Hungary's greatest ever driver,
Jean-Baumbgartner.
Is that because he's the only?
That is correct.
Oh, bless him.
Two left.
Can you name either of them, sir?
I have, angrily, and I think I know the team.
I think they drove for Jordan.
And I'm trying to have bloody think of their name, and I think it leaves a P.
Panis.
Yeah.
What's that Italian dessert? It's like a bread, but it's got like...
This is a very weird way to remember F1 drivers. I'll put it out there.
What's that called?
Panatoni. That's what it's called, didn't it? A panatoni.
His name sounds like panatoni.
I'm not giving you that.
No, I know, I'm just getting there.
This is my thought process.
I'm not there yet.
That's got my answer.
It sounds like Panetoni.
Mr. Panetoni.
Mr. Panthano.
Pantano.
It's Pantano.
It's Giorgio Pantano.
Was he there?
Giorgio Pantano, yeah.
He was indeed there.
Pantan.
Panthano.
I bet it's never been compared to a Pagotoni before.
I bet he has.
I mean, that does mean, Sam,
that you cannot lose.
because there's only one name left.
But
Harry's been so great to...
There is a chance that you don't win.
There is a chance you don't win
if Harry can somehow get a draw out of this
by naming the last person.
I'm glad I went first
because if we've done this order the other way round
and Harry had gone first,
I've not got a clue.
This is the only one I definitely have zero clue on.
It's a Menardi, right?
That's the last one.
I can't confirm nor deny.
Right, so it is.
This is a trick in it's Burned Myelander.
Who was in?
It's not a trick.
I'll go for, oh, I almost said Christian Alba's then.
That's a bit later.
Let's go for...
I'll record go for it.
Let's go for...
Oh, my God.
Oh, the tension is unreal.
Helpable.
I'm going to go for the...
My cold career is on the last.
Kinds of Chief's song
Brunny Brunny Bruny Bruny
Oh, it's Albers
It's Albers, Ben, please tell me it's Albers
I just want to be right for once in my life
Sam, there's a lot riding on
whether he's got this right or not
You could have your first win
Of the year
Is the Kingdom of Brunei in this car?
Unfortunately, Harry knows his stuff
Jean-Mria Bruny
is the last
answer, which means you have
I'm never visiting the Kingdom of Brunei
You have collectively run the board.
Well done.
I thought Panthano was
a fair play to Sam because I wouldn't have got
Panthano to be honest.
I thought Bloch drove that year.
Am I making that up?
Do you get replaced?
Maybe he was the
You're right.
He did either race that year or the year before.
O5 was his first full season,
was it?
he did a he did part of a season then he didn't race for like
three years yeah
I'm old I'm I'm googling it
oh it might have been that year
I don't know play the jingle what son's googling Sam
uh Ben yeah I'll do that
all right mate
F one
back and forth it's F1
back and forth it goes backwards
then goes forth it's F1
back and forth it's F1
back and forth
F1
He wasn't there in 2005 even
Was he there in 2004 ever?
I'm not going through the old season
I said different Google search
Tim O'Glock
Everyone's favourite Irish racing driver
Just hold with us everyone
We will close this out in a bit
We just need to find the answer to this
When you Google Tim O'Glock
The first question under what do people ask is
What did Timo Glock do?
Why did Glock go slow?
It's probably just people seeing
it's glott and wondering
what did he do? What did he do?
Racing record 2004
Formula One
I need to find the actual
He did racing in 2004 then
Yeah he did
What does TD mean? I don't want TD
Test driver I imagined
Oh thank you
That'll make sense
He raced in Canada
He raced in Canada
And then he raced in
China Japan
and Brazil.
That is sporadic.
And then he did not come back to Formula One until 2008.
Yeah, well, what a history lesson that is.
Well, I'm glad that we've managed to get the career of Timo Glock as a last topic in this podcast.
But I think that probably should be the last one for today.
Good news is we've got a lot of incredible episodes coming up.
Like ones we are really excited for preseason.
We've got Pimp My F1, which is going to.
come later on once alpha-rameo decide to actually release their car after it does the first test
at the end of 232 exactly so we will get on that one we've got drivers and constructors predictions
to go can't wait for us all to be wrong about that teammate wars is coming up in a couple of weeks
time so we have got a lot of good episodes coming up before the season starts at the end of
march until then sam if you wouldn't mind getting us out of here yeah so many good episodes
up and I'm here so you know those two can talk about F1 and I'll try and contribute
folks if you have managed to get an hour and ten minutes into our podcast thing
congratulations that is a real feat our parents can get this far into our lives
we appreciate it if you do want to stick around for more Formula One content more chat
more fun as we were mentioned earlier join the Discord the link is in the description I
believe I counted earlier there are about 360 members in the Discord now
is ridiculous
considering that we
once had a conversation
that said
we shouldn't bother
because no one
will ever turn up
also
if for some
strange reason
you do really like
the podcast
and the three of us
you think
I've got some
fair change of thing
in a month
no one does
it's an expensive
world
we have a Patreon
feel free to have a look
there are some benefits
such as old race
watchalongs
and merch
is obviously on the horizon
so you know
have a little look
to see what you think
under that
please join us
next week
we are massively
appreciated
we will talk more things Formula One.
In the meantime, I've been Sanguelsome.
I've been Ben Hocking.
I've been Georgio Pannoni.
And remember, keep breaking late.
Our theme song is an absolute banger, isn't it?
Find more great shows or join the team at sport-social.com.
The podcast is part of the Sports Social Podcast Network.
